o
|
Preliminary Proxy Statement | o | Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2)) | |||
þ
|
Definitive Proxy Statement | |||||
o
|
Definitive Additional Materials | |||||
o
|
Soliciting Material Pursuant to Section 240.14a-12 |
Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box): | ||
þ
|
No fee required. | |
o
|
Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and 0-11. | |
(1) Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies: | ||
(2 | ) | Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies: | ||||
(3 | ) | Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined): | ||||
(4 | ) | Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction: | ||||
(5 | ) | Total fee paid: | ||||
o
|
Fee paid previously with preliminary materials. | |
o
|
Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement number, or the Form or Schedule and the date of its filing. |
(1 | ) | Amount Previously Paid: | ||||
(2 | ) | Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.: | ||||
(3 | ) | Filing Party: | ||||
(4 | ) | Date Filed: | ||||
Date:
|
Thursday, April 30, 2009 | |
Time:
|
9:00 a.m., local time | |
Place:
|
Crowne Plaza Cabana Hotel 4290 El Camino Real Palo Alto, California 94306 |
Thomas R. Lavelle |
Page | ||||
1 | ||||
1 | ||||
5 | ||||
6 | ||||
6 | ||||
6 | ||||
10 | ||||
10 | ||||
11 | ||||
11 | ||||
11 | ||||
11 | ||||
11 | ||||
11 | ||||
12 | ||||
13 | ||||
13 | ||||
13 | ||||
14 | ||||
14 | ||||
14 | ||||
15 | ||||
15 | ||||
15 | ||||
16 | ||||
16 | ||||
16 | ||||
17 | ||||
17 | ||||
18 | ||||
18 | ||||
18 | ||||
19 | ||||
19 | ||||
20 | ||||
20 | ||||
20 | ||||
20 | ||||
20 | ||||
21 | ||||
23 | ||||
23 |
i
Page | ||||
23 | ||||
24 | ||||
24 | ||||
24 | ||||
25 | ||||
25 | ||||
27 | ||||
29 | ||||
29 | ||||
30 | ||||
32 | ||||
36 | ||||
36 | ||||
36 | ||||
38 | ||||
39 | ||||
42 | ||||
42 | ||||
43 | ||||
46 | ||||
46 | ||||
46 | ||||
46 | ||||
46 | ||||
47 | ||||
48 |
ii
Who May Attend | You may attend the Annual Meeting if you owned your shares, either as a stockholder of record or as a beneficial owner (as described below), as of the close of business on February 27, 2009 (the Record Date). | |
Stockholders of Record | ||
If your shares are registered directly in your name, then you are considered to be the stockholder of record with respect to those shares, and we are sending these proxy materials directly to you. To attend the meeting as a stockholder of record, please bring with you proper identification. | ||
Beneficial Owners | ||
If your shares are held in a stock brokerage account or by a bank or other nominee, you are considered the beneficial owner of shares held in street name, and your broker or nominee is forwarding these proxy materials to you. Your broker or nominee is considered to be the stockholder of record with respect to those shares. To attend the meeting as a beneficial owner, please bring with you proper identification and a statement from the broker, bank or other nominee holding your shares that confirms your beneficial ownership of the shares as of the Record Date. | ||
Who May Vote | You may vote at the Annual Meeting if you owned your shares, either as a stockholder of record or as a beneficial owner, as of the close of business on the Record Date. As of that date, we had a total of 104,448,165 shares of common stock outstanding, which were held of record by approximately 763 stockholders. As of the Record Date, we had no shares of preferred stock outstanding. You are entitled to one vote for each share of our common stock that you own. | |
Voting Your Proxy | Stockholders of Record |
If you hold your shares in your own name as a holder of record, you may instruct the proxy holders how to vote your common stock by: | ||
voting via the internet at www.proxyvote.com,
|
||
voting by telephone at
1-800-690-6903,
or
|
||
signing, dating and mailing the proxy card in the
postage-paid envelope that we have provided.
|
||
Even if you vote your shares by proxy, you may also choose to attend the meeting and vote your shares in person. If you provide instructions in your completed proxy card, the proxy holders will vote your shares in accordance with those instructions. If you sign and return a proxy card without giving specific voting instructions, your shares will be voted FOR the three proposals to be voted on at the Annual Meeting. | ||
Beneficial Owners | ||
If you are the beneficial owner of shares held in street name, you have the right to direct your broker how to vote. Your broker or nominee has enclosed with these materials or provided voting instructions for you to use in directing the broker or nominee how to vote your shares. | ||
You are invited to attend the meeting and vote your shares in person at the meeting. However, since you are not the stockholder of record, you must obtain and bring with you to the meeting a legal proxy from the broker, bank or other nominee holding your shares that confirms your beneficial ownership of the shares and gives you the right to vote your shares at the meeting. | ||
Discretionary Voting Power;
Matters to be Presented |
We are not aware of any matters to be presented at the Annual Meeting other than those described in this Proxy Statement. If any matters not described in this Proxy Statement are properly presented at the meeting, the proxy holders will use their own judgment to determine how to vote your shares. If the meeting is adjourned or postponed, the proxy holders can vote your shares on the new meeting date as well, unless you have subsequently revoked your proxy. | |
Changing Your Vote | Stockholders of Record | |
If you would like to change your vote you can do so in the following ways: | ||
deliver written notice of your revocation to our
corporate Secretary prior to the Annual Meeting;
|
||
deliver a properly executed, later dated proxy prior
to the Annual Meeting; or
|
||
attend the Annual Meeting and vote in person.
|
||
Please note that your attendance at the meeting in and of itself is not enough to revoke your proxy. |
2
Beneficial Owners | ||
If you instructed a broker or nominee to vote your shares following the directions originally included with these materials or provided to you, you can change your vote only by following your broker or nominees directions for doing so. You can only change your vote at the Annual Meeting if you have obtained a legal proxy from the broker, bank or other nominee holding your shares that confirms your beneficial ownership of the shares and gives you the right to vote your shares at the meeting. | ||
Cost of this Proxy Solicitation | We will bear the cost of this proxy solicitation. In addition to soliciting proxies by mail, we expect that our directors, officers and employees may solicit proxies in person or by telephone or facsimile. None of these individuals will receive any additional or special compensation for doing this, but they may be reimbursed for reasonable out-of-pocket expenses. We have also hired Morrow & Co., LLC to help us solicit proxies from brokers, bank nominees and other institutional owners. We expect to pay Morrow & Co., LLC a fee of up to approximately $8,000 for its services, and we will reimburse certain out-of-pocket expenses. | |
Meeting Quorum | The Annual Meeting will be held if a majority of our outstanding shares of common stock entitled to vote at the meeting are represented in person or by proxy. | |
Our Voting Recommendations | When proxies are properly dated, executed and returned, the shares represented by such proxies will be voted at the Annual Meeting in accordance with the directions of the stockholder. However, if no specific instructions are given, the shares will be voted in accordance with the following recommendations of our Board of Directors: | |
FOR the election of J. Thomas Bentley,
P. Michael Farmwald, Ph.D., Penelope A. Herscher, David
Shrigley and Eric Stang as Class II directors;
|
||
FOR the amendment to our 2006 Equity
Incentive Plan to increase the number of shares of common stock
of the Company reserved for issuance under such plan by
6,500,000 shares; and
|
||
FOR the ratification of
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as our independent registered public
accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December 31,
2009.
|
||
Abstentions, Withheld, and Broker Non-Votes
|
We treat shares that are voted WITHHELD or ABSTAIN in person or by proxy as being: | |
present for purposes of determining whether or not a
quorum is present at the Annual Meeting; and
|
||
entitled to vote on a particular subject matter at
the Annual Meeting; therefore a WITHHELD or
ABSTAIN vote is the same as voting against a
proposal that has a required, affirmative voting threshold, such
as Proposal Two or Three, but will have no effect on
Proposal One, the election of our Class II directors,
who are elected by a plurality of votes.
|
||
If you hold your common stock through a broker, the broker may be prevented from voting shares held in your brokerage account on some |
3
proposals (a broker non-vote) unless you have given the broker voting instructions. Shares that are subject to a broker non-vote are counted for purposes of determining whether a quorum exists but do not count for or against any particular proposal. | ||
Deadline for Receipt of Stockholder Proposals
|
Stockholders may present proposals for action at a future annual meeting only if they comply with the requirements of the proxy rules established by the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). Stockholder proposals, including nominations for the election of directors, which are intended to be presented by such stockholders at our 2010 Annual Meeting of Stockholders must be received by us no later than November 16, 2009 to be considered for inclusion in the proxy statement and proxy card relating to that meeting. | |
In addition to the SEC rules and regulations, our bylaws establish an advance notice procedure for proposals that a stockholder does not want to have included in our proxy statement relating to a meeting. Generally for these proposals, including the nomination of a person for director, a stockholder must provide written notice to our corporate secretary at least 90 days in advance of the meeting; provided that in the event that less than 100 days notice or prior public disclosure of the date of the meeting is given or made to stockholders, notice by the stockholder to be timely must be received not later than the close of business on the tenth day following the day on which such notice of the date of the meeting was mailed or such public disclosure was made. | ||
Moreover, your notice must contain specific information concerning the matters to be brought before the meeting. We urge you to read our bylaws in full in order to fully understand the requirements of bringing a proposal or nomination. | ||
A copy of the full text of the bylaw provision relating to our advance notice procedure may be obtained by writing to our corporate Secretary or by accessing a copy of our bylaws, which are publicly available at http://www.sec.gov. All notices of proposals by stockholders, whether or not included in proxy materials, should be sent to Rambus Inc., 4440 El Camino Real, Los Altos, CA 94022, Attention: Secretary. | ||
Communication With the Board of Directors
|
Our Board of Directors may be contacted by writing to them via regular mail at Board of Directors, Rambus Inc., 4440 El Camino Real, Los Altos, CA 94022. If you wish to contact our Board of Directors or any member of the Audit Committee to report questionable accounting or auditing matters you may do so anonymously by using this mailing address and designating the communication as confidential. | |
Our process for handling communications to our Board of Directors is as follows: | ||
Any stockholder communications that our Board of Directors receives will first go to our Secretary/General Counsel, who will log the date of receipt of the communication as well as (for non-confidential communications) the identity of the correspondent in our stockholder communications log. | ||
Unless the communication is marked confidential, our Secretary/General Counsel will review, summarize and, if appropriate, draft a |
4
response to the communication in a timely manner. The summary and response will be in the form of a memo, which will become part of the stockholder communications log that our Secretary/General Counsel maintains with respect to all stockholder communications. | ||
Our Secretary/General Counsel will then forward the original stockholder communication along with the memo to the member(s) of our Board of Directors (or committee chair if the communication is addressed to a committee) for review. | ||
Any stockholder communication marked confidential will be logged by our Secretary/General Counsel as received but will not be reviewed, opened or otherwise held by our Secretary/General Counsel. Such confidential correspondence will be immediately forwarded to the addressee(s) without a memo or any other comment by our Secretary/General Counsel. | ||
Annual Meeting Attendance | Members of our Board of Directors are invited but not required to attend the Annual Meeting of Stockholders. The 2008 Annual Meeting of Stockholders was attended by the following members of our Board of Directors: Messrs. Bentley, Chou, Dunlevie, Hughes, Shrigley and Sofaer, and Ms. Herscher. | |
Householding of Proxy Materials | The SEC has adopted rules that permit companies and intermediaries such as brokers to satisfy delivery requirements for proxy statements with respect to two or more stockholders sharing the same address by delivering a single proxy statement addressed to those stockholders. This process, which is commonly referred to as householding, potentially provides extra convenience for stockholders and cost savings for companies. The Company and some brokers household proxy materials, delivering a single proxy. If your proxy statement is being householded and you would like to receive separate copies, or if you are receiving multiple copies and would like to receive a single copy, please contact Investor Relations at Rambus Inc., 4440 El Camino Real, Los Altos, California 94022, Attention: Secretary, or ir@rambus.com, or place a collect call to the Company, at (650) 947-5000, and direct the call to the Investor Relations Department. | |
Delivery of Proxy Materials | To receive current and future proxy materials, such as annual reports, proxy statements and proxy cards, in either paper or electronic form, please contact Investor Relations at ir@rambus.com or http:// investor.rambus.com, or place a collect call to the Company, at (650) 947-5000, and direct the call to the Investor Relations Department. |
5
Nominees | Five Class II directors are to be elected at the Annual Meeting for a two-year term ending in 2011. Based upon the recommendation of our Corporate Governance/Nominating Committee, our Board has nominated: J. Thomas Bentley, P. Michael Farmwald, Ph.D., Penelope A. Herscher, David Shrigley and Eric Stang for election as Class II directors. | |
If any of J. Thomas Bentley, P. Michael Farmwald, Ph.D., Penelope A. Herscher, David Shrigley and Eric Stang is unable or declines to serve as a director at the time of the Annual Meeting, proxies will be voted for a substitute nominee or nominees designated by the Board of Directors. | ||
Vote Required | Directors are elected by a plurality of the shares present in person or represented by proxy at the meeting and entitled to vote on the election of directors. This means that the five nominees who receive the greatest number of votes will be elected. There are no cumulative voting rights in the election of directors. Stockholders as of the record date may vote their shares for some, all or none of the Class II nominees. | |
The following table contains information regarding the Class II nominees and other directors as of February 27, 2009. |
Name
|
Age | Principal Occupation and Business Experience | ||||
J. Thomas Bentley
|
59 | Mr. Bentley has served as a director since March 2005. He served as a managing director at SVB Alliant (formerly Alliant Partners), a mergers and acquisitions firm, since he co-founded the firm in 1990 until October 2005. Mr. Bentley holds a B.A. in Economics from Vanderbilt University and an M.S. in Management from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Mr. Bentley currently serves on the board of Nanometrics, Inc. | ||||
P. Michael Farmwald, Ph.D.
|
54 | Dr. Farmwald has served as a director since our founding in March 1990 and has served as senior technical advisor since October 2006. In addition, he served as vice president and chief scientist from March 1990 to November 1993. Dr. Farmwald founded Skymoon Ventures, a venture capital firm, in 2000. In addition, Dr. Farmwald has co-founded other semiconductor companies, including Matrix Semiconductor, Inc. in 1997. Dr. Farmwald holds a B.S. in Mathematics from Purdue University and a Ph.D. in Computer Science from Stanford University. |
6
Name
|
Age | Principal Occupation and Business Experience | ||||
Penelope A. Herscher
|
48 | Ms. Herscher has served as a director since July 2006. She currently holds the position of president and chief executive officer of firstRain, Inc., a custom-configured, on-demand intelligence services firm, which she joined in 2005. Ms. Herscher previously held the position of executive vice president and chief marketing officer at Cadence Design Systems from 2002 to 2003, and executive vice president and general manager, Design and Verification Business during the second half of 2003. From 1996 to 2002, Ms. Herscher was president and chief executive officer of Simplex Solutions, which was acquired by Cadence in 2002. Before Simplex, she was an executive at Synopsys for eight years and started her career as an R&D engineer with Texas Instruments. She holds a B.A. with honors in Mathematics from Cambridge University in England. Ms. Herscher serves on the boards of firstRain, JDS Uniphase, Inc. and several non-profit institutions. | ||||
David Shrigley
|
60 | Mr. Shrigley has served as a director since October 2006. Until the end of 2008, Mr. Shrigley was a member of the board of Wolfson Microelectronics plc, a supplier of mixed-signal chips for the digital market from November 2006, and was its chief executive officer from March 2007. He served as a general partner at Sevin Rosen Funds, a venture capital firm, from 1999 to 2005. Prior to that, Mr. Shrigley held the position of executive vice president, Marketing, Sales and Service at Bay Networks. Mr. Shrigley served in various executive positions at Intel, including vice president and general manager of Asia Pacific sales and marketing operations based in Hong Kong, and vice president and general manager, corporate marketing. Mr. Shrigley holds a B.S. from Franklin University. Mr. Shrigley serves on the board of SPI Lasers plc. |
7
Name
|
Age | Principal Occupation and Business Experience | ||||
Eric Stang
|
49 | Mr. Stang has served as a director since July 2008. Mr. Stang currently serves as a director and president and chief executive officer of ooma, Inc., a provider of broadband telephony products, a position he has held since January 2009. Prior to joining ooma, Mr. Stang served as chief executive officer and president of Reliant Technologies, Inc., a developer of medical technology solutions for aesthetic applications, from 2006 to 2008. Mr. Stang previously served as CEO and President of Lexar Media, Inc., a provider of solid state memory products from 2001 to 2006 and Chairman from 2004 to 2006. Mr. Stang received his A.B. from Stanford University and MBA from the Harvard Business School. Mr. Stang also serves on the boards of Solta Medical and several private companies. |
Name
|
Age | Principal Occupation and Business Experience | ||||
Sunlin Chou, Ph.D.
|
62 | Dr. Chou was appointed to the Board of Directors in March 2006. Dr. Chou served for 34 years at Intel Corporation, before retiring in 2005 as a senior vice president. He was co-general manager of the Technology and Manufacturing Group from 1998 to 2005. Dr. Chou holds a B.S., M.S. and E.E. in Electrical Engineering from Massachusetts Institute of Technology and received a Ph.D. in Electrical Engineering from Stanford University. Dr. Chou serves on the board of several non-profit institutions. | ||||
Bruce Dunlevie
|
52 | Mr. Dunlevie has served as a director since our founding in March 1990. He has been a general partner of the venture capital firm Benchmark Capital since May 1995, and was a general partner of the venture capital firm Merrill, Pickard, Anderson & Eyre between 1989 and 2000. He holds a B.A. in History and English from Rice University and an M.B.A. from Stanford University. Mr. Dunlevie serves on the boards of various private companies. |
8
Name
|
Age | Principal Occupation and Business Experience | ||||
Mark Horowitz, Ph.D.
|
51 | Dr. Horowitz has served as a director since our founding in March 1990 and has served as chief scientist since May 2005. Dr. Horowitz also served as a vice president from March 1990 to May 1994. Dr. Horowitz has taught at Stanford University since 1984 where he is currently a professor of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science. He holds B.S. and M.S. degrees in Electrical Engineering from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology and received his Ph.D. in Electrical Engineering from Stanford University. | ||||
Harold Hughes
|
63 | Mr. Hughes has served as our chief executive officer and president since January 2005 and as a director since June 2003. He served as a United States Army Officer from 1969 to 1972 before starting his private sector career at Intel Corporation. Mr. Hughes held a variety of positions within Intel Corporation from 1974 to 1997, including treasurer, vice president of Intel Capital, chief financial officer, and vice president of Planning and Logistics. Following his tenure at Intel, Mr. Hughes was the chairman and chief executive officer of Pandesic, LLC. He holds a B.A. from the University of Wisconsin and an M.B.A. from the University of Michigan. He also serves as a director of Berkeley Technology, Ltd. and a private company. |
9
Name
|
Age | Principal Occupation and Business Experience | ||||
Abraham D. Sofaer
|
70 | Mr. Sofaer has served as a director since May 2005. He has been the George P. Shultz Distinguished Scholar and Senior Fellow at the Hoover Institution at Stanford University since 1994. Mr. Sofaer has a long and distinguished career in the legal profession. Prior to assuming his current roles, he served in private practice as a partner at Hughes, Hubbard & Reed in Washington, DC and as the chief legal adviser to the U.S. Department of State. From 1979 to 1985, Mr. Sofaer served as a U.S. District Judge for the Southern District of New York. He was a professor at the Columbia University School of Law from 1969 to 1979, and from 1967 to 1969 was an Assistant U.S. Attorney in the Southern District of New York. Mr. Sofaer graduated magna cum laude with a B.A. in History from Yeshiva College and received his law degree from the New York University School of Law where he was editor-in-chief of the NYU Law Review. He clerked for Hon. J. Skelly Wright on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit, and for Justice William J. Brennan, Jr. on the U.S. Supreme Court. Mr. Sofaer currently serves as a director of NTI, Inc. and Gen-Probe, Inc., several private companies and non-profit institutions. |
Our Board of Directors held a total of ten meetings during 2008. During 2008, each member of our Board of Directors attended 75% or more of the meetings of the Board of Directors and of the committees, if any, of which she or he was a member. | ||
Director Independence |
Our Board of Directors has determined that each of the following
directors, constituting a majority of our Board of Directors,
has no material relationship with us (either directly as a
partner, stockholder or officer of an organization that has a
relationship with us) and is independent as defined
under NASD Rule 4200 and the applicable rules promulgated
by the SEC: J. Thomas Bentley, Eric Stang, Sunlin Chou, David
Shrigley, Bruce Dunlevie, Abraham D. Sofaer and Penelope A.
Herscher. Each of the committees of our Board of Directors is composed of independent directors as follows: |
|
Audit
Committee: J.
Thomas Bentley (Chair)
|
||
Sunlin Chou | ||
Abraham D. Sofaer | ||
Compensation Committee: Penelope A. Herscher (Chair) | ||
David Shrigley | ||
Eric Stang | ||
Corporate Governance/ | ||
Nominating Committee: Sunlin Chou (Chair) | ||
Penelope A. Herscher | ||
David Shrigley |
10
Director Qualifications | Except as may be required by rules promulgated by the NASD or the SEC, there are currently no specific, minimum qualifications that must be met by each candidate for our Board of Directors, nor are there any specific qualities or skills that are necessary for one or more of the members of our Board of Directors to possess. | |
Corporate Governance Principles | We are committed to maintaining the highest standards of business conduct and corporate governance, which we believe are essential to running our business efficiently, serving our stockholders well and maintaining our integrity in the marketplace. We have adopted a code of business conduct and ethics for directors, officers, and employees known as the Code of Business Conduct and Ethics, which is available on our website at http://investor.rambus.com/governance/governance.cfm. | |
Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act requires our executive officers, directors and ten percent stockholders to file reports of ownership and changes in ownership with the SEC. The same persons are required to furnish us with copies of all Section 16(a) forms they file. Based solely on our review of these forms, we believe that during fiscal 2008 all of our executive officers, directors and ten percent stockholders complied with the applicable filing requirements, except for a late Form 4 filed on behalf of Dr. Scott reporting the vesting of restricted stock units on October 28, 2008 that was inadvertently reported late by us on his behalf on December 23, 2008. | ||
During 2008, there were three sessions of the independent directors. | ||
During 2008, our Board of Directors had four standing committees: | ||
|
an Audit Committee,
|
|
|
a Compensation Committee,
|
|
|
a Corporate Governance/Nominating Committee and
|
|
|
a Legal Affairs Committee.
|
|
|
The following describes each committee, its function, its membership, and the number of meetings held during 2008. In February 2009, our Board of Directors disbanded the Legal Affairs Committee. | |
|
Each of the committees operates under a written charter adopted
by our Board of Directors. All of the current committee charters
are available on our website at http://investor.rambus.com/governance/governance.cfm. |
|
Currently, the Audit Committee is composed of J. Thomas Bentley, Abraham D. Sofaer and Sunlin Chou, Ph.D., with Mr. Bentley serving as Chair. The Audit Committee oversees our corporate accounting and financial reporting processes and internal control over financial reporting, as well as our internal and external audits. The Audit Committee held 10 meetings during 2008. Its duties include: | ||
|
Reviewing our accounting and financial reporting
processes and internal control over financial reporting;
|
|
|
Providing oversight and review at least annually of
our risk management policies, including our investment policies;
|
11
|
Retaining the independent auditors, approving their
fees, and providing oversight of communication with them;
|
|
|
Reviewing the plans, findings and performance of our
internal auditors;
|
|
|
Reviewing our annual and quarterly financial
statements and related disclosure documents; and
|
|
|
Overseeing special investigations into financial and
other matters, as necessary, such as the independent
investigation into historical stock option grants.
|
|
|
Our Board of Directors has determined that Mr. Bentley is the Audit Committee financial expert and that Mr. Bentley, together with each of Mr. Sofaer and Dr. Chou, has no material relationship with us (either directly as a partner, stockholder or officer of an organization that has a relationship with us) and is independent as defined under NASD Rule 4200 and the applicable rules promulgated by the SEC. | |
|
The Audit Committees role is detailed in the Audit
Committee Charter and is available on our website at http://investor.rambus.com/governance/audit.cfm. |
|
Currently, the Compensation Committee is composed of Penelope A. Herscher, David Shrigley and Eric Stang, with Ms. Herscher serving as Chair. All members of the Compensation Committee are non-employee, outside directors. The Compensation Committee reviews and determines all forms of compensation to be provided to our executive officers and directors of Rambus, including base compensation, bonuses, and stock compensation. The Compensation Committee held 11 meetings during 2008. Its duties include: | ||
|
Annually review and approve the CEO and other
executive officers compensation in the context of their
performance, which includes reviewing and approving their annual
base salary, annual incentive bonus, including the specific
goals, targets, and amounts, equity compensation, employment
agreements, severance arrangements, and change in control
agreements/provisions, and any other benefits, compensation or
arrangements;
|
|
|
Administer our stock option and equity incentive
plans pursuant to the terms of such plans and the authority
delegated by our Board of Directors. In its administration of
the plans, the Compensation Committee may grant stock options,
stock appreciation rights, restricted stock, restricted stock
units or other equity compensation to individuals eligible for
such grants and amend such awards following their grant;
|
|
|
Adopt, amend and oversee the administration of our
significant employee benefits programs;
|
|
|
Review external surveys to establish appropriate
ranges of compensation; and
|
|
|
Retain and terminate any compensation consultant to
assist in the evaluation of CEO or executive officer or director
compensation, and approve the consultants fees and other
terms of service, as well
|
12
as obtain advice and assistance from internal or external legal, accounting or other advisors. | ||
|
A detailed description of the processes and procedures of the Compensation Committee for considering and determining executive and director compensation is provided in the Executive Compensation section of this proxy statement. | |
|
The Compensation Committees role is detailed in the
Compensation Committee Charter, which is available on our
website at http://investor.rambus.com/governance/compensation.cfm. |
|
During fiscal year 2008, no interlocking relationship existed between any member of our Compensation Committee and any member of any other companys board of directors or compensation committee, nor has any such interlocking relationship existed in the past. During fiscal year 2008, no member of the Compensation Committee was, or was formerly, an officer or an employee of our Company. | ||
Currently, the Corporate Governance/Nominating Committee is composed of Sunlin Chou, Penelope A. Herscher and David Shrigley, with Dr. Chou serving as Chair of the Corporate Governance/Nominating Committee. The Corporate Governance/Nominating Committee held four meetings during 2008. | ||
|
The Corporate Governance/Nominating Committee recommends and approves Rambus Corporate Governance Guidelines. Its duties include: | |
|
Evaluating and making recommendations to the Board
of Directors concerning the appointment of directors to
committees of the Board of Directors and the selection of
committee chairs;
|
|
|
Identifying best practices and recommending
corporate governance principles;
|
|
|
Overseeing the evaluation of the Board of Directors;
and
|
|
|
Proposing the slate of nominees for election to the
Board of Directors.
|
|
|
The Corporate Governance/Nominating Committees role is
detailed in the Corporate Governance/Nominating Committee
Charter which is available on our website at http://investor.rambus.com/governance/nominating.cfm. |
|
The Corporate Governance/Nominating Committee utilizes a variety of methods for identifying and evaluating nominees for director. In the event that vacancies on the Board of Directors are anticipated, or otherwise arise, the committee will consider various potential candidates for director. Candidates may come to the attention of the committee through current members of the Board of Directors, professional search firms, stockholders or other persons. The Corporate Governance/Nominating Committee has from time to time retained third parties to whom a fee is paid to assist it in identifying or evaluating potential nominees. In 2008, the Corporate Governance/Nominating Committee retained the firm of Spencer Stuart in connection with the recruitment of Eric Stang to the Board. |
13
Consideration of Stockholder Nominees to the Board
|
It is the policy of the Corporate Governance/Nominating Committee to consider nominees recommended by stockholders for election to our Board of Directors. Stockholder recommendations for candidates to our Board of Directors must be directed in writing to Rambus Inc., 4440 El Camino Real, Los Altos, CA 94022 Attention: Secretary, and must include: the candidates name, age, business address and residence address; the candidates principal occupation or employment; the number of shares of the company which are beneficially owned by such candidate; a description of all arrangements or understandings between the stockholder making such nomination and any other person or persons (naming such person or persons) pursuant to which the nominations are to be made by the stockholder; detailed biographical data and qualifications; information regarding any relationships between the candidate and the Company within the last three years; any other information relating to such nominee that is required to be disclosed in solicitations of proxies for elections of directors, or is otherwise required, in each case pursuant to Regulation 14A under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. A stockholders recommendation to the Secretary must also set forth: the name and address, as they appear on the Companys books, of the stockholder making such recommendation; the class and number of shares of the Company which are beneficially owned by the stockholder and the date such shares were acquired by the stockholder; any material interest of the stockholder in such nomination; any other information that is required to be provided by the stockholder pursuant to Regulation 14A under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, in his capacity as a proponent to a stockholder proposal; and a statement from the recommending stockholder in support of the candidate, references for the candidate, and an indication of the candidates willingness to serve, if elected. | |
In 2006, our Board of Directors established a Legal Affairs Committee as a standing committee of the Board. In February 2009, our Board of Directors disbanded the Legal Affairs Committee. The Legal Affairs Committee was composed of the following independent directors: Abraham D. Sofaer and J. Thomas Bentley, and Mr. Sofaer served as Chair of the Legal Affairs Committee. The purpose of the Legal Affairs Committee was to provide us and our stockholders with an independent committee of directors who could assist the Board of Directors and management in dealing with law-related issues on an ongoing basis. | ||
On October 18, 2006, the Audit Committee recommended, and the Board of Directors approved, the formation of a Special Litigation Committee (the SLC) to evaluate potential claims or other actions arising from the findings of the Audit Committees investigation of the timing of past stock option grants and other related accounting issues. In February 2009, our Board of Directors disbanded the Special Litigation Committee given that its work was completed. The SLC was composed of the following independent directors: J. Thomas Bentley and Abraham Sofaer. Messrs. Bentley and Sofaer were disinterested directors for the purpose of the SLC and they were not believed to have past or present business dealings with any potential subjects of the |
14
investigation that would impair their ability to act independently and in good faith. | ||
None. | ||
Our directors and executive officers are subject to our Code of Business Conduct and Ethics and our directors are guided in their duties by our Corporate Governance Guidelines. Our Code of Business Conduct and Ethics requires that our directors and executive officers avoid situations where a conflict of interest might occur or appear to occur. In general, our directors and executive officers should not have a pecuniary interest in transactions involving us or a customer, licensee, or supplier of us, unless such interest is solely a result of routine investments made by the individual in publicly traded companies. | ||
|
In the event that a director or executive officer is going to enter into a related party transaction with a relative or significant other, or with a business in which a relative or significant other is associated in any significant role, the director or executive officer must fully disclose the nature of the related party transaction to our chief financial officer. For directors and executive officers, such related party transaction then must be reviewed and approved in writing in advance by the Audit Committee. For other conflicts of interest that may arise, the Code of Business Conduct and Ethics advises our directors and executive officers to consult with our General Counsel. | |
|
In addition, on an annual basis and upon any new appointment of a director and executive officer, each is required to complete a Director and Officer Questionnaire, which requires disclosure of any related-party transactions pertaining to the director or executive officer. Our Board of Directors will consider such information in its determinations of independence with respect to our directors under NASD Rule 4200 and the applicable rules promulgated by the SEC. | |
|
Our Board recommends that you vote FOR the election to the Board of Directors of each of the nominees proposed above. |
15
Vote Required; Recommendation of the Board of
Directors
|
Approval of the Amendment to the Incentive Plan requires the affirmative vote of a majority of the shares of our Common Stock that are present in person or proxy and entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting. | |
|
Our Board of Directors recommends that you vote FOR the Amendment to the 2006 Equity Incentive Plan and the increase to the number of shares reserved for issuance thereunder. | |
The following is a summary of the principal features of the Incentive Plan and its operation. The summary is qualified in its entirety by reference to the Incentive Plan, as amended giving effect to this Proposal Two, set forth in Appendix A. | ||
|
The Incentive Plan provides for the grant of the following types of incentive awards: | |
|
stock options
|
|
|
stock appreciation rights
|
|
|
restricted stock
|
|
|
restricted stock units
|
|
|
performance shares and performance units
|
|
|
other stock or cash awards
|
|
|
Each of these is referred to individually as an Award. Those who are eligible for Awards under the Incentive Plan include employees, directors and consultants who provide services to the Company and its affiliates. As of February 27, 2009, approximately 332 employees, directors and consultants would be eligible to participate in the Incentive Plan. | |
If stockholders approve Proposal 2, an additional 6,500,000 shares of the Companys Common Stock will be reserved for issuance under the Incentive Plan. As of February 27, 2009, 6,907,904 shares were subject to outstanding Awards granted under the Incentive Plan, with a weighted average exercise price of $13.51 per share and weighted average remaining term of 7.38 years, and 1,723,224 shares remained available for any new Awards to be granted in the future. Shares subject to Awards granted with an exercise price less than the fair market value on the date of grant count against the share reserve as 1.5 shares for every one share subject to such an Award. To the extent that a share that was subject to an Award that counted as 1.5 shares against the Incentive Plan reserve pursuant to the preceding sentence is returned to the Incentive Plan, the Incentive Plan reserve will be |
16
credited with 1.5 shares that will thereafter be available for issuance under the Incentive Plan. | ||
|
If we declare a stock dividend or engage in a reorganization or other change in our capital structure, including a merger, our Board of Directors will have the discretion to adjust the number of shares: | |
|
available for issuance under the Incentive Plan
|
|
|
subject to outstanding Awards
|
|
|
specified as per-person limits on Awards, as
appropriate to reflect the change
|
|
Our Board of Directors, or a committee of directors or of other individuals satisfying applicable laws and appointed by our Board of Directors, the Compensation Committee, administers the Incentive Plan. To make grants to certain of our officers and key employees, the members of the committee must qualify as non-employee directors under Rule 16b-3 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and as outside directors under Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the Code) so that we can receive a federal tax deduction for certain compensation paid under the Incentive Plan. Subject to the terms of the Incentive Plan, our Board of Directors or its committee has the sole discretion to select the employees, consultants, and directors who will receive Awards, determine the terms and conditions of Awards, and to interpret the provisions of the Incentive Plan and outstanding Awards. Notwithstanding the foregoing, our Board of Directors or committee may not modify or amend an option or stock appreciation right to reduce the exercise price of that Award after it has been granted or to cancel any outstanding option or stock appreciation right and replace it with a new option or stock appreciation right with a lower exercise price. Our Board of Directors or other committee administering the Incentive Plan is referred to below as the Administrator. | ||
The Administrator is able to grant nonstatutory stock options and incentive stock options under the Incentive Plan. The Administrator determines the number of shares subject to each option, although the Incentive Plan provides that a participant may not receive options for more than 1,000,000 shares in any fiscal year, except in connection with his or her initial service as an employee with us, in which case he or she may be granted an option to purchase up to an additional 1,000,000 shares. | ||
|
The Administrator determines the exercise price of options granted under the Incentive Plan, provided the exercise price must be at least equal to the fair market value of our Common Stock on the date of grant. In addition, the exercise price of an incentive stock option granted to any participant who owns more than 10% of the total voting power of all classes of our outstanding stock must be at least 110% of the fair market value of our Common Stock on the grant date. | |
|
The term of an option may not exceed ten years, except that, with respect to any participant who owns 10% of the voting power of all classes of our outstanding capital stock, the term of an incentive stock option may not exceed five years. |
17
|
After a termination of service with us, a participant will be able to exercise the vested portion of his or her option for the period of time stated in the Award agreement. If no such period of time is stated in the participants Award agreement, the participant will generally be able to exercise his or her option for (i) three months following his or her termination for reasons other than death or disability, and (ii) twelve months following his or her termination due to death or disability. In no event may an option be exercised later than the expiration of its term. | |
The Administrator is able to grant stock appreciation rights, which are the rights to receive the appreciation in fair market value of common stock between the exercise date and the date of grant. We can pay the appreciation in either cash or shares of common stock. Stock appreciation rights become exercisable at the times and on the terms established by the Administrator, subject to the terms of the Incentive Plan. The Administrator, subject to the terms of the Incentive Plan, has complete discretion to determine the terms and conditions of stock appreciation rights granted under the Incentive Plan, provided, however, that the exercise price may not be less than 100% of the fair market value of a share on the date of grant. The term of a stock appreciation right may not exceed ten years. No participant will be granted stock appreciation rights covering more than 1,000,000 shares during any fiscal year, except that a participant may be granted stock appreciation rights covering up to an additional 1,000,000 shares in connection with his or her initial service as an employee with us. | ||
|
After termination of service with us, a participant will be able to exercise the vested portion of his or her stock appreciation right for the period of time stated in the Award agreement. If no such period of time is stated in a participants Award agreement, a participant will generally be able to exercise his or her stock appreciation right for (i) three months following his or her termination for reasons other than death or disability, and (ii) twelve months following his or her termination due to death or disability. In no event will a stock appreciation right be exercised later than the expiration of its term. | |
Awards of restricted stock are rights to acquire or purchase shares of our Common Stock, which vest in accordance with the terms and conditions established by the Administrator in its sole discretion. For example, the Administrator may set restrictions based on the achievement of specific performance goals. The Award agreement will generally grant us a right to repurchase or reacquire the shares upon the termination of the participants service with us for any reason (including death or disability). The Administrator will determine the number of shares granted pursuant to an Award of restricted stock, but no participant will be granted a right to purchase or acquire more than 200,000 shares of restricted stock during any fiscal year, except that a participant may be granted up to an additional 300,000 shares of restricted stock in connection with his or her initial employment with us. | ||
Awards of restricted stock units result in a payment to a participant only if the vesting criteria the Administrator establishes is satisfied. For example, the Administrator may set restrictions based on the |
18
achievement of specific performance goals. Upon satisfying the applicable vesting criteria, the participant will be entitled to the payout specified in the Award agreement. Notwithstanding the foregoing, at any time after the grant of restricted stock units, the Administrator may reduce or waive any vesting criteria that must be met to receive a payout. The Administrator, in its sole discretion, may pay earned restricted stock units in cash, shares, or a combination thereof. Restricted stock units that are fully paid in cash will not reduce the number of shares available for grant under the Incentive Plan. On the date set forth in the Award agreement, all unearned restricted stock units will be forfeited to us. The Administrator determines the number of restricted stock units granted to any participant, but during any fiscal year, no participant may be granted more than 200,000 restricted stock units, except that the participant may be granted up to an additional 300,000 restricted stock units in connection with his or her initial employment with us. | ||
The Administrator is able to grant performance units and performance shares, which are Awards that result in a payment to a participant only if the performance goals or other vesting criteria the Administrator establishes are achieved or the Awards otherwise vest. The Administrator establishes performance or other vesting criteria in its discretion, which, depending on the extent to which they are met, will determine the number and/or the value of performance units and performance shares to be paid out to participants. Notwithstanding the foregoing, after the grant of performance units or shares, the Administrator, in its sole discretion, may reduce or waive any performance objectives or other vesting provisions for such performance units or shares. During any fiscal year, no participant will receive more than 200,000 performance shares and no participant will receive performance units having an initial value greater than $2,000,000, except that a participant may be granted performance shares covering up to an additional 300,000 shares in connection with his or her initial employment with us. Performance units will have an initial dollar value established by the Administrator on or before the date of grant. Performance shares will have an initial value equal to the fair market value of a share of our Common Stock on the grant date. | ||
Awards of restricted stock, restricted stock units, performance shares, performance units and other incentives under the Incentive Plan may be made subject to the attainment of performance goals relating to one or more business criteria within the meaning of Section 162(m) of the Code and may provide for a targeted level or levels of achievement including: cash flow; cash position; earnings before interest and taxes; earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization; earnings per share; economic profit; economic value added; equity or stockholders equity; market share; net income; net profit; net sales; operating earnings; operating income; profit before tax; ratio of debt to debt plus equity; ratio of operating earnings to capital spending; sales growth; return on net assets; or total return to stockholders. The performance goals may differ from participant to participant and from Award to Award and may be used to measure the performance of our business as a whole or one of our business units and may be measured relative to a peer group or index. |
19
Grants to Non-Employee Directors
|
The Incentive Plan provides for automatic, nondiscretionary awards to non-employee directors. | |
Initial Equity Grant
|
Each non-employee director will be automatically granted a nonstatutory stock option to purchase 40,000 shares when he or she first becomes a member of our Board of Directors. The term of such options shall not exceed ten years. The option grants vest over a four-year period, with one-eighth of shares subject to the option vesting six months after the date of grant and the remaining shares vesting ratably each month thereafter, subject to the non-employee director continuing to serve through each applicable vesting date. | |
Annual Equity Grant
|
Each non-employee director shall automatically receive an annual award of restricted stock units on October 1 of each year. The number of restricted stock units subject to the award will be determined in the sole discretion of our Board of Directors on or prior to the award becoming effective on the applicable October 1 grant date. For a description of the current non-employee director annual equity grants, see Executive Compensation Compensation of Directors. The restricted stock unit grants vest in full at the end of a one-year period, subject to the non-employee director continuing to serve through each applicable vesting date. If the non-employee discontinues service prior to the vesting of any restricted stock unit grant, the Administrator may, in its discretion, permit such grant to vest pro rata for the portion of the year during which such director served. | |
|
The automatic grants do not limit the ability of the Administrator to grant other discretionary awards to non-employee directors under the Incentive Plan and the Administrator has the discretion to change the terms of the automatic grants prospectively. | |
Awards granted under the Incentive Plan are generally not transferable, and all rights with respect to an Award granted to a participant generally will be available during a participants lifetime only to the participant. | ||
The terms of the Incentive Plan provide that all outstanding equity awards may vest upon a double-trigger termination in the event of a change of control, as described under the Executive Compensation Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal 2008 Year-End table. | ||
The Administrator will have the authority to amend, alter, suspend or terminate the Incentive Plan, except that stockholder approval will be required for any amendment to the Incentive Plan to the extent required by any applicable laws. No amendment, alteration, suspension or termination of the Incentive Plan will impair the rights of any participant, unless mutually agreed otherwise between the participant and the Administrator and which agreement must be in writing and signed by the participant and us. The Incentive Plan will terminate in March 2016, unless our Board of Directors terminates it earlier. | ||
The number of Awards that an employee, director or consultant may receive under the Incentive Plan is in the discretion of the Administrator and therefore cannot be determined in advance. | ||
|
The following table sets forth (i) the aggregate number of shares of common stock subject to options granted under the Incentive Plan |
20
during the last fiscal year, (ii) the average per share exercise price of such options, (iii) the aggregate number of shares issued pursuant to awards of restricted stock granted under the Incentive Plan during the last fiscal year, and (iv) the dollar value of such shares based on the closing price per share on the grant dates. |
Number of |
Dollar Value |
|||||||||||||||
Average |
Shares of |
of Shares of |
||||||||||||||
Number of |
Per Share |
Restricted |
Restricted |
|||||||||||||
Name of Individual or Group
|
Options Granted | Exercise Price | Stock | Stock | ||||||||||||
Named Executive Officers:
|
||||||||||||||||
Harold Hughes
|
32,000 | $ | 19.86 | 72,000 | (1) | $ | 1,429,920 | |||||||||
Satish Rishi
|
40,000 | $ | 19.86 | 12,000 | $ | 238,320 | ||||||||||
Thomas R. Lavelle
|
40,000 | $ | 19.86 | 32,000 | $ | 599,320 | ||||||||||
Sharon E Holt
|
40,000 | $ | 19.86 | 32,000 | $ | 599,320 | ||||||||||
Martin Scott
|
30,000 | $ | 19.86 | 30,000 | $ | 559,600 | ||||||||||
All executive officers, as a group
|
232,000 | $ | 19.86 | 232,000 | $ | 4,430,140 | ||||||||||
All directors who are not executive officers, as a group
|
40,000 | $ | 15.95 | 111,064 | $ | 1,518,227 | ||||||||||
All employees who are not executive officers, as a group
|
1,612,490 | $ | 19.77 | 361,000 | $ | 6,666,440 |
(1) | 48,000 restricted stock units cancelled on December 31, 2008 as performance criteria was not met. |
Federal Tax Aspects
|
The following paragraphs are a summary of the general federal income tax consequences to U.S. taxpayers and Awards granted under the Incentive Plan by us. Tax consequences for any particular individual may be different. The Incentive Plan does not purport to be complete, and does not discuss the tax consequences of a participants death or the income tax laws of any state or foreign country in which the participant may reside. | |
Nonstatutory Stock Options
|
No taxable income is reportable when a nonstatutory stock option with an exercise price equal to the fair market value of the underlying stock on the date of grant is granted to a participant. Upon exercise, the participant will recognize ordinary income in an amount equal to the excess of the fair market value (on the exercise date) of the shares purchased over the exercise price of the option. Any taxable income recognized in connection with an option exercise by an employee is subject to tax withholding by us. Any additional gain or loss recognized upon any later disposition of the shares would be capital gain or loss. | |
Incentive Stock Options
|
No taxable income is reportable when an incentive stock option is granted or exercised (except for purposes of the alternative minimum tax, in which case taxation is the same as for nonstatutory stock options). If the participant exercises the option and then later sells or otherwise disposes of the shares more than two years after the grant date and more than one year after the exercise date, the difference between the sale price and the exercise price will be taxed as capital gain or loss. If the participant exercises the option and then later sells or otherwise disposes of the shares before the end of the two- or one-year holding periods described above, he or she generally will have ordinary income at the time of the sale equal to the fair market value of |
21
the shares on the exercise date (or the sale price, if less) minus the exercise price of the option. | ||
Stock Appreciation Rights
|
No taxable income is reportable when a stock appreciation right with an exercise price equal to the fair market value of the underlying stock on the date of grant is granted to a participant. Upon exercise, the participant will recognize ordinary income in an amount equal to the amount of cash received and the fair market value of any shares received. Any additional gain or loss recognized upon any later disposition of the shares would be capital gain or loss. | |
Restricted Stock, Restricted Stock Units, Performance Units
and Performance Shares
|
A participant generally will not have taxable income at the time an Award of restricted stock, restricted stock units, performance shares or performance units are granted. Instead, he or she will recognize ordinary income in the first taxable year in which his or her interest in the shares underlying the Award becomes either (i) freely transferable or (ii) no longer subject to substantial risk of forfeiture. However, the recipient of a restricted stock Award may elect to recognize income at the time he or she receives the Award in an amount equal to the fair market value of the shares underlying the Award (less any cash paid for the shares) on the date the Award is granted. | |
Tax Effect for Rambus
|
We generally will be entitled to a tax deduction in connection with an Award under the Incentive Plan in an amount equal to the ordinary income realized by a participant and at the time the participant recognizes such income (for example, the exercise of a nonstatutory stock option). Special rules limit the deductibility of certain compensation paid to our Chief Executive Officer and to each of its four highest compensated officers. Under Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code, no deduction is allowed for certain compensation with respect to any of these specified executives only to the extent that the amount for the taxable year for such executive exceeds $1,000,000. However, the deductibility of such compensation in excess of $1,000,000 may not be limited under Section 162(m) and the applicable treasury regulations if such compensation qualifies as performance based. | |
Section 409A
|
Section 409A of the Code provides certain new requirements on non-qualified deferred compensation arrangements. These include new requirements with respect to an individuals election to defer compensation and the individuals selection of the timing and form of distribution of the deferred compensation. Section 409A also generally provides that distributions must be made on or following the occurrence of certain events (e.g., the individuals separation from service, a predetermined date, or the individuals death). Section 409A imposes restrictions on an individuals ability to change his or her distribution timing or form after the compensation has been deferred. For certain individuals who are officers, Section 409A requires that such individuals distribution commence no earlier than six months after such officers separation from service. | |
|
Awards granted under the Incentive Plan with a deferral feature will be subject to the requirements of Section 409A. If an Award is subject to and fails to satisfy the requirements of Section 409A, the recipient of |
22
that award may recognize ordinary income on the amounts deferred under the Award, to the extent vested, which may be prior to when the compensation is actually or constructively received. Also, if an Award that is subject to Section 409A fails to comply with Section 409As provisions, Section 409A imposes an additional 20% federal income tax on compensation recognized as ordinary income, as well as interest on such deferred compensation. In addition, certain states such as California have adopted similar provisions. | ||
|
The foregoing is only a summary of the effect of federal income taxation upon participants and us with respect to the grant and exercise of awards under the Incentive Plan. It does not purport to be complete, and does not discuss the tax consequences of a participants death or the provisions of the income tax laws of any municipality, state or foreign country in which the participant may reside. |
Our History with PricewaterhouseCoopers
|
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP (or its predecessor, Coopers & Lybrand L.L.P.) has audited our financial statements since 1991. Representatives of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP may be present at the Annual Meeting to respond to appropriate questions and to make a statement if they so desire. | |
The aggregate fees billed for professional accounting services by PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2008, and December 31, 2007 are as follows: |
Fiscal |
Fiscal |
|||||||||||
Year Ended |
Year Ended |
|||||||||||
December 31, |
December 31, |
|||||||||||
2008 | 2007 | |||||||||||
Audit Fees(1) | $ | 1,821,607 | $ | 9,378,555 | ||||||||
Audit-Related Fees | $ | | $ | | ||||||||
Tax Fees(2) | $ | 4,767 | $ | 6,415 | ||||||||
All Other Fees(3) | $ | 9,750 | $ | 3,000 | ||||||||
Total Fees | $ | 1,836,124 | $ | 9,387,970 | ||||||||
(1) | Audit Fees consist of fees for PricewaterhouseCoopers LLPs professional services rendered for the audit of the Companys consolidated annual financial statements and review of the interim consolidated financial statements included in quarterly |
23
reports. Fees relating to professional services rendered for the audits of managements assessment of the effectiveness of internal controls over financial reporting in fiscal 2007 and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting in fiscal 2008 and 2007 are included under Audit Fees. The fiscal 2007 Audit Fees include fees of approximately $6.7 million relating to professional services rendered for the restated financial statements as a result of the investigation into historical stock option grants. | ||
(2) | Tax Fees primarily relate to statutory tax compliance and technical tax advice in both years presented. | |
(3) | All Other Fees consist of fees for products and services other than the services described above. During fiscal 2008 and fiscal 2007, these fees related to a license to PricewaterhouseCoopers LLPs online accounting and auditing research tool and disclosure checklist. |
The Audit Committees policy is to pre-approve 100% of all audit and permissible non-audit services provided by the independent registered public accounting firm. These services may include audit services, audit-related services, tax services and other services. Pre-approval is generally provided for up to one year and any pre-approval is detailed as to the particular service or category of services and is generally subject to a specific budget. The independent registered public accounting firm and management are required to periodically report to the Audit Committee regarding the extent of services provided by the independent registered public accounting firm in accordance with this pre-approval, and the fees for the services performed to date. The Audit Committee may also pre-approve particular services on a case-by-case basis. | ||
The Audit Committee has determined that the accounting advice and tax services provided by PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP are compatible with maintaining PricewaterhouseCoopers LLPs independence. | ||
The affirmative vote of a majority of the shares present and entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting will be required to ratify the appointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm. | ||
|
The Board recommends that you vote FOR the ratification of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2009. |
24
A | B | C | ||||||||||
Number of |
||||||||||||
Securities |
||||||||||||
Remaining |
||||||||||||
Available for |
||||||||||||
Future |
||||||||||||
Number of |
Issuance under |
|||||||||||
Securities to be |
Weighted- |
Equity |
||||||||||
Issued upon |
Average |
Compensation |
||||||||||
Exercise of |
Exercise Price of |
Plans |
||||||||||
Outstanding Awards, |
Outstanding Awards, |
(Excluding |
||||||||||
Options, |
Options, |
Securities |
||||||||||
Warrants and |
Warrants and |
Reflected in |
||||||||||
Plan Category
|
Rights | Rights | Column A) | |||||||||
Equity Compensation Plans Approved by Security Holders(1)
|
8,376,234 | $ | 18.66 | 3,822,055 | ||||||||
Equity Compensation Plans Not Approved by Security Holders(2)
|
3,441,237 | $ | 26.48 | | ||||||||
Total
|
11,817,471 | $ | 20.94 | 3,822,055 |
(1) | Data reflects our 1990 Stock Plan (the 1990 Plan), 1997 Stock Plan (the 1997 Plan), 2006 Equity Incentive Plan (the 2006 Plan), and 2006 Employee Stock Purchase Plan (the 2006 Purchase Plan). | |
Our 2006 Plan was approved by our stockholders at our 2006 annual meeting. Under the 2006 Plan as approved, a total of 8,400,000 shares of our Common Stock were reserved for issuance. The 2006 Purchase Plan was approved by our stockholders at our 2006 annual meeting. Under the 2006 Purchase Plan as approved, a total of 1,600,000 shares of our Common Stock were reserved for purchase. | ||
Our 1990 Plan was terminated in May 1997 with the adoption of the 1997 Plan. Although no further awards may be made thereunder, the plan continues to govern outstanding awards granted under that plan. | ||
As a result of the stockholder approval of our 2006 Plan, we terminated the 1997 Plan so that, as of the date of termination, no further awards have been or will be made thereunder, but the plan will continue to govern outstanding awards granted under that plan. | ||
(2) | Data reflects our 1999 Nonstatutory Stock Option Plan described below. |
25
Number of |
Percentage of |
|||||||||||
Shares |
Options |
Shares |
||||||||||
Beneficially |
Exercisable |
Beneficially |
||||||||||
Name or Group of Beneficial Owners
|
Owned | in 60 Days | Owned(1) | |||||||||
PRIMECAP Management Company(2)
|
12,015,114 | 11.5 | % | |||||||||
255 South Lake Ave., #400
Pasadena, CA 91101 |
||||||||||||
FMR LLC(3)
|
10,533,600 | 10.1 | % | |||||||||
82 Devonshire Street
Boston, MA 02109 |
||||||||||||
Hedreen Joint Venture(4)
|
5,980,000 | 5.7 | % | |||||||||
P.O. Box 9006
Seattle, WA 98109 |
||||||||||||
Vanguard Horizon Funds(5)
|
5,235,000 | 5.0 | % | |||||||||
100 Vanguard Blvd.
Malvern, PA 19355 |
||||||||||||
Harold E. Hughes
|
681,842 | 595,842 | * | |||||||||
Satish Rishi(6)
|
258,102 | 184,666 | * | |||||||||
Thomas Lavelle(7)
|
113,425 | 99,333 | * | |||||||||
Sharon Holt
|
291,148 | 287,415 | * | |||||||||
Martin Scott
|
104,500 | 97,000 | * | |||||||||
* | ||||||||||||
J. Thomas Bentley
|
77,500 | 70,417 | * | |||||||||
Sunlin Chou
|
50,833 | 50,833 | * | |||||||||
Bruce Dunlevie
|
682,992 | 157,500 | * | |||||||||
P. Michael Farmwald(8)
|
2,405,736 | 77,500 | 2.3 | % | ||||||||
Penelope A. Herscher
|
35,000 | 35,000 | * | |||||||||
Mark A. Horowitz(9)
|
1,276,618 | 79,933 | 1.2 | % | ||||||||
David Shrigley
|
32,500 | 32,500 | * | |||||||||
Abraham Sofaer
|
64,343 | 59,166 | * | |||||||||
Eric Stang
|
7,500 | 7,500 | * | |||||||||
All current directors and executive officers as a group
(17 persons)
|
7,456,549 | 3,133,353 | 7.1 | % | ||||||||
Shares Outstanding as of February 27, 2009
|
104,448,165 |
* | (Less than 1%) | |
(1) | Percentage of shares beneficially owned is based on 104,448,165 shares outstanding as of February 27, 2009. | |
(2) | As reported on Schedule 13G/A on February 5, 2009. | |
(3) | As reported on Schedule 13G/A on February 17, 2009. The Schedule 13G/A was filed jointly on behalf of FMR LLC, Edward C. Johnson 3d, Fidelity Management & Research Company and Fidelity Growth Company Fund in connection with the beneficial ownership of the Common Stock of Rambus Inc. | |
(4) | As reported from a paper copy of Schedule 13D dated December 5, 2008 provided to the Company. | |
(5) | As reported on Schedule 13G/A on February 13, 2009. | |
(6) | Includes 1,400 shares held in custodial accounts for minor children for which Mr. Rishi serves as custodian. | |
(7) | Includes 6,425 shares held in trust for which Mr. Lavelle serves as trustee. | |
(8) | Includes 1,672,592 shares pledged as collateral on a margin account with a brokerage firm. | |
(9) | Includes 207,239 shares held in trust for which Dr. Horowitz serves as trustee. |
26
Kevin S. Donnelly
|
47 | Senior Vice President, IP Strategy. Mr. Donnelly joined us in 1993. Mr. Donnelly has served in his current position since November 2008. From March 2006 to November 2008, Mr. Donnelly served as our Senior Vice President, Engineering. From February 2005 to March 2006, Mr. Donnelly served as co-vice president of Engineering. From October 2002 to February 2005 he served as vice president, Logic Interface Division. Mr. Donnelly held various engineering and management positions before becoming vice president, Logic Interface Division in October 2002. Before joining us, Mr. Donnelly held engineering positions at National Semiconductor, Sipex, and Memorex, over an eight year period. He holds a B.S. in Electrical Engineering and Computer Sciences from the University of California, Berkeley, and an M.S. in Electrical Engineering from San Jose State University. | ||||
Sharon E. Holt
|
44 | Senior Vice President, Licensing and Marketing. Ms. Holt has served as our senior vice president, Licensing and Marketing (formerly titled Senior Vice President, Worldwide Sales, Licensing and Marketing) since joining us in August 2004. From November 1999 to July 2004, Ms. Holt held various positions at Agilent Technologies, Inc., an electronics instruments and controls company, most recently as vice president and general manager, Americas Field Operations, Semiconductor Products Group. Prior to Agilent Technologies, Inc., Ms. Holt held various engineering, marketing, and sales management positions at Hewlett-Packard Company, a hardware manufacturer. Ms. Holt holds a B.S. in Electrical Engineering, with a minor in Mathematics, from the Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University. | ||||
Harold Hughes
|
63 | Chief Executive Officer and President. Mr. Hughes has served as our chief executive officer and president since January 2005 and as a director since June 2003. He served as a United States Army Officer from 1969 to 1972 before starting his private sector career with Intel Corporation. Mr. Hughes held a variety of positions within Intel Corporation from 1974 to 1997, including treasurer, vice president of Intel Capital, chief financial officer, and vice president of Planning and Logistics. Following his tenure at Intel, Mr. Hughes was the chairman and chief executive officer of Pandesic, LLC. He holds a B.A. from the University of Wisconsin and an M.B.A. from the University of Michigan. He also serves as a director of Berkeley Technology, Ltd. | ||||
Thomas Lavelle
|
58 | Senior Vice President and General Counsel. Mr. Lavelle has served in his current position since December 2006. Previous to that, Mr. Lavelle served as vice president and general counsel at Xilinx, one of the worlds leading suppliers of programmable chips. Mr. Lavelle joined Xilinx in 1999 after spending more than 15 years at Intel Corporation where he held various positions in the legal department. Mr. Lavelle earned a J.D. from Santa Clara University School of Law and a B.A. from the University of California at Los Angeles. |
27
Satish Rishi
|
49 | Senior Vice President, Finance and Chief Financial Officer. Mr. Rishi joined us in his current position in April 2006. Prior to joining us, Mr. Rishi held the position of executive vice president of Finance and chief financial officer of Toppan Photomasks, Inc., (formerly DuPont Photomasks, Inc.) one of the worlds leading photomask providers, from November 2001 to April 2006. During his 20-year career, Mr. Rishi has held senior financial management positions at semiconductor and electronic manufacturing companies. He served as vice president and assistant treasurer at Dell Inc. Prior to Dell, Mr. Rishi spent 13 years at Intel Corporation, where he held financial management positions both in the United States and overseas, including assistant treasurer. Mr. Rishi holds a B.S. with honors in Mechanical Engineering from Delhi University in Delhi, India and an M.B.A. from the University of California at Berkeleys Haas School of Business. He also serves as a director of Measurement Specialties, Inc. | ||||
Michael Schroeder
|
49 | Vice President, Human Resources. Mr. Schroeder has served as our vice president, Human Resources since joining us in June 2004. From April 2003 to May 2004, Mr. Schroeder was vice president, Human Resources at DigitalThink, Inc., an online service company. From August 2000 to August 2002, Mr. Schroeder served as vice president, Human Resources at Alphablox Corporation, a software company. From August 1992 to August 2000, Mr. Schroeder held various positions at Synopsys, Inc., a software and programming company, including vice president, California Site Human Resources, group director Human Resources, director Human Resources and employment manager. Mr. Schroeder attended the University of Wisconsin, Milwaukee and studied Russian. | ||||
Martin Scott, Ph.D.
|
53 | Senior Vice President, Research and Technology Development. Dr. Scott has served in his current position (formerly titled Senior Vice President, Engineering) since December 2006. Dr. Scott joined us from PMC-Sierra, Inc., a provider of broadband communications and storage integrated circuits, where he was most recently vice president and general manager of its Microprocessor Products Division from March 2006. Dr. Scott was the vice president and general manager for the I/O Solutions Division (which was purchased by PMC-Sierra) of Avago Technologies Limited, an analog and mixed signal semiconductor components and subsystem company, from October 2005 to March 2006. Dr. Scott held various positions at Agilent Technologies, including as vice president and general manager for the I/O Solutions division from October 2004 to October 2005, when the division was purchased by Avago Technologies, vice president and general manager of the ASSP Division from March 2002 until October 2004, and, before that, Network Products operation manager. Dr. Scott started his career in 1981 as a member of the technical staff at Hewlett Packard Laboratories and held various management positions at Hewlett Packard and was appointed ASIC business unit manager in 1998. He earned a B.S. from Rice University and holds both an M.S. and Ph.D. from Stanford University. |
28
Laura S. Stark
|
40 | Senior Vice President, Corporate Development. Ms. Stark joined us in 1996. Ms. Stark has served in her current position since May 2008. From February 2005 to May 2008, Ms. Stark headed up our Platform Solutions Group. From October 2002 to February 2005, Ms. Stark served as our vice president, Memory Interface Division. Ms. Stark has served as strategic accounts manager, and held the positions of strategic accounts director and vice president, Alliances and Infrastructure, before assuming the position of vice president, Memory Interface Division in October 2002. Prior to joining Rambus, Ms. Stark held various positions in the semiconductor products division of Motorola, a communications equipment company, during a six year tenure, including technical sales engineer for the Apple sales team and field application engineer for the Sun and SGI sales teams. Ms. Stark holds a B.S. in Electrical Engineering from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. |
29
30
31
| Annual Base Salary; | |
| Annual Variable Compensation; | |
| Equity Based Compensation; and | |
| All Other Compensation, which includes 401(k) match, health/welfare and other standard benefits. |
32
Percentage |
||||||||||||
Name and Title
|
Year | Salary | Increase | |||||||||
Harold Hughes
|
2009 | $ | 480,000 | 9.1 | % | |||||||
Chief Executive Officer
|
2008 | $ | 440,000 | |||||||||
Satish Rishi
|
2009 | $ | 325,000 | 2.1 | % | |||||||
Senior Vice President,
Finance and Chief Financial Officer |
2008 | $ | 318,240 | |||||||||
Thomas R. Lavelle
|
2009 | $ | 325,000 | 4.2 | % | |||||||
Senior Vice President
and General Counsel |
2008 | $ | 312,000 | |||||||||
Sharon E. Holt
|
2009 | $ | 320,000 | 2.6 | % | |||||||
Senior Vice President, Licensing and Marketing
|
2008 | $ | 312,000 | |||||||||
Martin Scott
|
2009 | $ | 320,000 | 6.1 | % | |||||||
Senior Vice President, Research and
|
2008 | $ | 301,600 | |||||||||
Technology Development
|
33
Name
|
2009 Bonus Target Amount | Percentage of 2009 Base Salary | ||||||
Harold Hughes
|
$ | 480,000 | 100.0 | % | ||||
Satish Rishi
|
$ | 240,000 | 73.8 | % | ||||
Thomas R. Lavelle
|
$ | 275,000 | 84.6 | % | ||||
Sharon E. Holt
|
$ | 275,000 | 85.9 | % | ||||
Martin Scott
|
$ | 240,000 | 75.0 | % |
34
35
Change in |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Pension |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Value and |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Nonqualified |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Non-Equity |
Deferred |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stock |
Option |
Incentive Plan |
Compensation |
All Other |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Salary |
Bonus |
Awards |
Awards |
Compensation |
Earnings |
Compensation |
Total |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Name and Title
|
Year | ($) | ($) | (1)($) | (2)($) | (3)(4)($) | ($) | (5)($) | ($) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Harold Hughes
|
2008 | 440,000 | | 108,965 | 66,127 | 242,000 | | 25,593 | 882,685 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Chief Executive Officer and President
|
2007 | 416,250 | 168,000 | | 568,717 | | | 16,643 | 1,169,610 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2006 | 375,000 | | | 1,857,443 | 662,282 | | 9,388 | 2,904,113 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Satish Rishi
|
2008 | 318,240 | | 54,482 | 82,659 | 132,000 | | 25,301 | 612,682 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Senior Vice President,
|
2007 | 305,500 | 90,000 | 428,109 | 227,487 | | | 17,091 | 1,068,187 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Finance and Chief Financial Officer
|
2006 | 208,077 | | 305,995 | 868,169 | 256,445 | | 451,886 | 2,090,572 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Thomas R. Lavelle
|
2008 | 312,000 | | 85,369 | 82,659 | 132,000 | | 20,218 | 632,246 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Senior Vice President
|
2007 | 300,000 | 90,000 | 48,961 | 487,709 | | | 8,328 | 934,998 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
and General Counsel
|
2006 | 24,038 | | | | | | 151,525 | 175,563 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Sharon E. Holt
|
2008 | 312,000 | | 85,369 | 82,659 | 151,250 | | 28,418 | 659,696 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Senior Vice President,
|
2007 | 297,917 | 100,000 | | 181,989 | | | 12,348 | 592,254 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Licensing and Marketing
|
2006 | 275,000 | | | 211,167 | 346,153 | | 12,090 | 844,410 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Martin Scott
|
2008 | 301,600 | | 76,288 | 61,994 | 112,750 | | 25,890 | 578,522 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Senior Vice President,
|
2007 | 294,462 | 76,000 | 19,671 | 487,709 | | | 13,278 | 891,120 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Research and Technology Development
|
2006 | | | | | | | | |
36
(1) | Amounts shown do not reflect compensation actually received by the named executive officer. Instead, the amounts shown are the dollar amounts recognized for financial statement reporting purposes by us in fiscal year 2008 and previous years for stock awards in accordance with the provisions of SFAS 123(R). The assumptions used to calculate the value of stock awards are set forth under Note 7 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008. | |
(2) | Amounts shown do not reflect compensation actually received by the named executive officers. Instead, the amounts shown are the dollar amounts, disregarding the estimate of forfeitures related to service-based vesting conditions, recognized for financial statement reporting purposes by us for stock option awards in accordance with the provisions of SFAS 123(R). Stock compensation expense calculations for financial statement purposes spread the grant date cost of those awards over the service period. Therefore, amounts in this column include the expense for awards granted in fiscal year 2008 and previous years. The assumptions used to calculate the value of stock option awards are set forth under Note 7 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008. | |
(3) | Amounts for fiscal year 2008 consist of bonuses earned for services rendered in fiscal year 2008 and are based upon the Companys achievement of the 2008 Corporate Incentive Plan target. The Companys achievement was 55% of the previously approved target of $82.8 million dollars of adjusted pre-tax income. The target and achievement results were reviewed and approved by the Compensation Committee. The plan is further described under Compensation Discussion & Analysis Executive Compensation Components Performance-based Incentive Plan. | |
(4) | Amounts for fiscal year 2006 consist of bonuses earned for services rendered under our performance-based incentive plan, which is generally described under Compensation Discussion & Analysis Executive Compensation Components Performance-based Incentive Plan. | |
(5) | In addition to any specific other compensation disclosed with respect to individual named executive officers, amounts reported in the All Other Compensation column for 2008 and previous years consist of matching contributions to the named executive officers 401(k) accounts and premiums paid for health and welfare insurance policies. |
37
All Other |
All Other |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stock |
Option |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Awards |
Awards: |
Exercise |
Grant Date |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Estimated Future Payouts |
Number of |
Number of |
or Base |
Fair Value |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Under Equity |
Shares or |
Securities |
Price of |
of Stock & |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Estimated Future Payouts Under Non-Equity Incentive Plan Awards(1) | Incentive Plan Awards |
Stock |
Underlying |
Option |
Options |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Grant |
Approval |
Threshold |
Target |
Maximum |
Threshold |
Target |
Maximum |
Units |
Options |
Awards |
Awards |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Name
|
Date | Date | ($) | ($) | ($) | (#) | (#) | (#) | (2) (#) | (3) (#) | ($/Sh) | ($)(4) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Harold E. Hughes
|
02/01/2008 | 01/09/2008 | | | | | | | 24,000 | | 0.00 | 476,640 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
02/01/2008 | 01/09/2008 | | | | | | | 24,000 | | 0.00 | 476,640 | (5) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
02/01/2008 | 01/09/2008 | | | | | | | 24,000 | | 0.00 | 476,640 | (6) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
02/01/2008 | 01/09/2008 | | | | | | | | 40,000 | 19.86 | 361,718 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 01/08/2009 | 220,000 | 440,000 | 1,320,000 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Satish Rishi
|
02/01/2008 | 01/09/2008 | | | | | | | 12,000 | | 0.00 | 238,320 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
02/01/2008 | 01/09/2008 | | | | | | | | 40,000 | 19.86 | 452,148 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
02/01/2008 | 01/09/2008 | | | | | | | | | | | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 01/08/2009 | 120,000 | 240,000 | 720,000 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Thomas R. Lavelle
|
08/28/2008 | 01/09/2008 | | | | | | | 20,000 | | 0.00 | 361,000 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
02/01/2008 | 01/09/2008 | | | | | | | 12,000 | | 0.00 | 238,320 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
02/01/2008 | 01/09/2008 | | | | | | | | 40,000 | 19.86 | 452,148 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 01/08/2009 | 120,000 | 240,000 | 720,000 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Sharon Holt
|
08/28/2008 | 01/09/2008 | | | | | | | 20,000 | | 0.00 | 361,000 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
02/01/2008 | 01/09/2008 | | | | | | | 12,000 | | 0.00 | 238,320 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
02/01/2008 | 01/09/2008 | | | | | | | | 40,000 | 19.86 | 452,148 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 01/08/2009 | 137,500 | 275,000 | 825,000 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Martin Scott
|
08/28/2008 | 01/09/2008 | | | | | | | 20,000 | | 0.00 | 361,000 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
02/01/2008 | 01/09/2008 | | | | | | | 10,000 | | 0.00 | 198,600 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
02/01/2008 | 01/09/2008 | | | | | | | | 30,000 | 19.86 | 339,111 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 01/08/2009 | 102,500 | 205,000 | 615,000 |
(1) | Amounts shown are estimated payouts for fiscal year 2008 to the named executive officers based on the 2008 bonus targets under the plan discussed under Compensation Discussion & Analysis Executive Compensation Components Performance-based Incentive Plan. Actual bonuses received by these named executive officers for fiscal 2008 are reported in the Summary Compensation for Fiscal Year 2008 table under the column entitled Bonus and described under Compensation Discussion & Analysis Executive Compensation Components Performance-based Incentive Plan. | |
(2) | Stock units granted on August 28, 2008 represent one-time retention grants of 20,000 restricted stock units respectively to Mr. Lavelle, Ms. Holt and Dr. Scott. Restricted stock units granted to all named executives on February 1, 2008 represent performance based awards in fiscal year 2008. | |
(3) | The stock options were granted as part of the Companys regular performance review process and vest based on the executive continuing to provide services to the company through the applicable vesting dates. See the Compensation Discussion and Analysis and Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year-End for additional information with respect to these option grants. | |
(4) | The value of a stock award or option award is based on the fair market value as of the grant date of such award determined pursuant to SFAS 123(R), disregarding the estimate of forfeitures related to service-based vesting conditions. Stock awards consist of restricted stock unit awards. The exercise price for all options granted to the named executive officers is 100% of the fair market value of the shares on the grant date. The option exercise price has not been deducted from the amounts indicated above. Regardless of the value placed on a stock option on the grant date, the actual value of the option will depend on the amount the market value of our Common Stock at such date in the future when the option is exercised exceeds the exercise price. | |
(5) | The restricted stock unit was granted on February 1, 2008 according to 2008 performance criteria that was not met. The restricted stock units cancelled on December 31, 2008. | |
(6) | The restricted stock unit was granted on February 1, 2008 according to 2008 performance criteria that was not met. The restricted stock units cancelled on December 31, 2008. |
38
Option Awards | Stock Awards | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Equity |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Incentive |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Plan |
Equity |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Equity |
Awards: # |
Incentive |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Incentive |
of |
Plan Awards: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Plan |
Unearned |
Mkt or |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Awards: |
Shares, |
Payout Value |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
# of |
# of |
# of |
Units or |
of Unearned |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Securities |
Securities |
Securities |
Mkt Value of |
Other |
Shares, Units |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Underlying |
Underlying |
Underlying |
# of Shares or |
Shares or |
Rights |
or Other |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Unexercised |
Unexercised |
Unexercised |
Option |
Option |
Units of Stock |
Units of Stock |
That Have |
Rights That |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Option (#) |
Option (#) |
Unearned |
Exercise |
Expiration |
That Have |
That Have |
Not |
Have Not |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Name
|
Exercisable | Unexercisable | Options (#) | Price ($) | Date | Not Vested (#) | Not Vested ($)(1) | Vested (#) | Vested ($) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Harold Hughes
|
5,333 | (2) | 26,667 | | 19.86 | 2/1/2018 | | | | | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| | | | | 24,000 | (3) | 382,080 | | | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
91,666 | (4) | 158,334 | | 18.69 | 2/1/2017 | | | | | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
157,500 | (5) | 112,500 | | 22.94 | 1/6/2016 | | | | | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
244,791 | (6) | 5,209 | | 21.51 | 1/10/2015 | | | | | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
14,543 | (7) | | | 16.07 | 10/1/2014 | | | | | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
40,000 | (8) | | | 17.51 | 6/2/2013 | | | | | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Satish Rishi
|
6,666 | (9) | 33,334 | | 19.86 | 2/1/2018 | | | | | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| | | | | 12,000 | (10) | 191,040 | | | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| | | | | 75,000 | (11) | 1,194,000 | | | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
36,666 | (12) | 63,334 | | 18.69 | 2/1/2017 | | | | | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
117,333 | (13) | 102,667 | | 40.80 | 4/11/2016 | | | | | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| | | | | 20,000 | (14) | 318,400 | | | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Thomas R. Lavelle
|
| | | | | 20,000 | (15) | 318,400 | | | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
6,666 | (16) | 33,334 | | 19.86 | 2/1/2018 | | | | | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| | | | | 12,000 | (17) | 191,040 | | | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| | | | | 30,000 | (18) | 477,600 | | | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
76,666 | (19) | 123,334 | | 19.16 | 1/3/2017 | | | | | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Sharon E. Holt
|
| | | | | 20,000 | (20) | 318,400 | | | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
6,666 | (21) | 33,334 | | 19.86 | 2/1/2018 | | | | | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| | | | | 12,000 | (22) | 191,040 | | | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
29,333 | (23) | 50,667 | | 18.69 | 2/1/2017 | | | | | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
43,750 | (24) | 31,250 | | 22.94 | 1/6/2016 | | | | | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 32,000 | (25) | | 24.04 | 12/3/2014 | | | | | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
173,333 | (26) | 26,667 | | 16.76 | 8/2/2014 | | | | | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Martin Scott
|
| | | | | 20,000 | (27) | 318,400 | | | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
5,000 | (28) | 25,000 | | 19.86 | 2/1/2018 | | | | | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| | | | | 10,000 | (29) | 159,200 | | | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| | | | | 15,000 | (30) | 238,800 | | | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
76,666 | (31) | 123,334 | | 19.16 | 1/3/2017 | | | | |
(1) | The market value is calculated using the closing price of our Common Stock of $15.92 on December 31, 2008 (the last trading day of 2008), as reported on The Nasdaq Global Select Market, multiplied by the unvested stock amount. | |
(2) | The option was granted on February 1, 2008. Options representing 10% of the shares vested six months from the grant date, and the remaining shares vest in equal monthly installments until it is fully vested on February 1, 2013. | |
(3) | The restricted stock unit was granted on February 1, 2008. The grant shall vest in equal installments of 6,000 shares on each anniversary grant date until one-hundred percent vested. | |
(4) | The option was granted on February 1, 2007. Options representing 10% of the shares vested six months from the grant date, and the remaining shares vest in equal monthly installments until it is fully vested on February 1, 2012. | |
(5) | The option was granted on January 6, 2006. Options representing 10% of the shares vested six months from the grant date, and the remaining shares vest in equal monthly installments until it is fully vested on January 6, 2011. |
39
(6) | The option was granted on January 10, 2005. Options representing 1/48th of the shares vest monthly during the four year period following the grant date. | |
(7) | The option was granted on October 1, 2004. Options representing 1/48th of the shares vest monthly over the four year period following the grant date. | |
(8) | The option was granted on June 2, 2003. Options representing 5,000 shares vested on December 2, 2003, and the remaining options vested in equal monthly installments until it was fully vested on June 2, 2007. | |
(9) | The option was granted on February 1, 2008. Options representing 10% of the shares vested six months from the grant date, and the remaining shares vest in equal monthly installments until it is fully vested on February 1, 2013. | |
(10) | The restricted stock unit was granted on February 1, 2008. The grant shall vest in equal installments of 3,000 shares on each anniversary grant date until one-hundred percent vested. | |
(11) | The restricted stock unit was granted on October 18, 2007. 25,000 units vested on February 1, 2008. Thereafter, the remaining shares shall vest in equal installments of 25,000 shares on or about each one-year anniversary on the first available trading day. | |
(12) | The option was granted on February 1, 2007. Options representing 10% shares vested six months from the grant date, and the remaining shares vest in equal monthly installments until it is fully vested on February 1, 2012. | |
(13) | The option was granted on April 11, 2006. Options representing 10% shares vested six months from the grant date, and the remaining shares vest in equal monthly installments until it is fully vested on April 11, 2011. | |
(14) | The restricted stock award was granted on April 11, 2006. A portion of the restricted stock award representing 5,000 units each vested respectively on October 23, 2006 and April 24, 2007, and the restricted stock representing 10,000 units will vest on the first available trading day under our insider trading policy in April 2008, 2009, and 2010. | |
(15) | The restricted stock unit was granted on August 28, 2008. The grant shall vest in equal installments of 5,000 shares on each anniversary grant date until one-hundred percent vested. | |
(16) | The option was granted on February 1, 2008. Options representing 10% of the shares vested six months from the grant date, and the remaining shares vest in equal monthly installments until it is fully vested on February 1, 2013. | |
(17) | The restricted stock unit was granted on February 1, 2008. The grant shall vest in equal installments of 3,000 shares on each anniversary grant date until one-hundred percent vested. | |
(18) | The restricted stock unit was granted on October 17, 2007. The grant shall vest in equal installments of 10,000 units on each anniversary date of hire date or the next open window until it is fully vested. | |
(19) | The option was granted on January 3, 2007. Options representing 10% shares vested six months from the grant date, and the remaining shares vest in equal monthly installments until it is fully vested on January 3, 2012. | |
(20) | The restricted stock unit was granted on August 28, 2008. The grant shall vest in equal installments of 5,000 shares on each anniversary grant date until one-hundred percent vested. | |
(21) | The option was granted on February 1, 2008. Options representing 10% of the shares vested six months from the grant date, and the remaining shares vest in equal monthly installments until it is fully vested on February 1, 2013. | |
(22) | The restricted stock unit was granted on February 1, 2008. The grant shall vest in equal installments of 3,000 shares on each anniversary grant date until one-hundred percent vested. | |
(23) | The option was granted on February 1, 2007. Options representing 10% shares vested six months from the grant date, and the remaining shares vest in equal monthly installments until it is fully vested on February 1, 2012. | |
(24) | The option was granted on January 6, 2006. Options representing 10% of the shares vested six months from the grant date, and the remaining shares vest in equal monthly installments until it is fully vested on January 6, 2011. |
40
(25) | The option was granted on December 3, 2004. Options representing 1/12th of the total grant will begin vesting in monthly installments on January 31, 2009 and will be fully vested on December 31, 2009. | |
(26) | The option was granted on August 2, 2004. Options representing 10% of the shares vested six months from the grant date and the remaining shares vest in equal monthly installments until it is fully vested on August 2, 2009. | |
(27) | The restricted stock unit was granted on August 28, 2008. The grant shall vest in equal installments of 5,000 shares on each anniversary grant date until one-hundred percent vested. | |
(28) | The option was granted on February 1, 2008. Options representing 10% of the shares vested six months from the grant date, and the remaining shares vest in equal monthly installments until it is fully vested on February 1, 2013. | |
(29) | The restricted stock unit was granted on February 1, 2008. The grant shall vest in equal installments of 2,500 shares on each anniversary grant date until one-hundred percent vested. | |
(30) | The restricted stock unit was granted on October 17, 2007. The grant shall vest in equal installments of 5,000 units on each anniversary date of hire date or the next open window until it is fully vested. | |
(31) | The option was granted on January 3, 2007. Options representing 10% shares vested six months from the grant date, and the remaining shares vest in equal monthly installments until it is fully vested on January 3, 2012. |
41
Option Awards | Stock Awards | |||||||||||||||||||
Number of Shares |
Value |
Number of |
Value |
|||||||||||||||||
Acquired on |
Realized on |
Shares Acquired on |
Realized on |
|||||||||||||||||
Name
|
Exercise (#) | Exercise ($) | Vesting (#) | Vesting (1)($) | ||||||||||||||||
Harold Hughes
|
| | | | ||||||||||||||||
Satish Rishi
|
| | 35,000 | 728,900 | ||||||||||||||||
Thomas R. Lavelle
|
| | 10,000 | 175,000 | ||||||||||||||||
Sharon E. Holt
|
| | | | ||||||||||||||||
Martin Scott
|
| | 5,000 | 36,500 |
(1) | The value realized equals the market value of our Common Stock on the vesting date, multiplied by the number of shares that vested. |
42
Total Value of |
||||||||||||
Value of |
Value of |
Accelerated |
||||||||||
Accelerated |
Accelerated |
Options and |
||||||||||
Name
|
Stock Options ($) | Stock Awards ($) | Stock Awards ($) | |||||||||
Harold Hughes
|
| 382,080 | 382,080 | |||||||||
Satish Rishi
|
| 1,703,440 | 1,703,440 | |||||||||
Thomas R. Lavelle
|
| 987,040 | 987,040 | |||||||||
Sharon E. Holt
|
| 509,440 | 509,440 | |||||||||
Martin Scott
|
| 716,400 | 716,400 |
Change in |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Pension and |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Value and |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Fees |
Non-Qualified |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Earned |
Non-Equity |
Deferred |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
or Paid |
Stock |
Option |
Incentive Plan |
Compensation |
All Other |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
in Cash |
Awards(1) |
Awards |
Compensation |
Earnings |
Compensation |
Total |
||||||||||||||||||||||
Name
|
($) | ($) | ($) | ($) | ($) | ($) | ($) | |||||||||||||||||||||
J. Thomas Bentley
|
65,000 | 39,888(2 | ) | | | | | 104,888 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Sunlin Chou
|
44,375 | 39,888(3 | ) | | | | | 84,263 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Bruce Dunlevie
|
56,039 | 39,888(4 | ) | | | | | 95,927 | ||||||||||||||||||||
P. Michael Farmwald
|
40,000 | 39,888(5 | ) | | | | | 79,888 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Penelope A. Herscher
|
58,750 | 39,888(6 | ) | | | | | 98,638 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Kevin Kennedy
|
32,500(7 | ) | | | | | 244,027(7 | ) | 276,527 | |||||||||||||||||||
David Shrigley
|
40,000 | 39,888(8 | ) | | | | | 79,888 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Abraham Sofaer
|
62,489 | (9) | 39,888(10 | ) | | | | | 102,377 | |||||||||||||||||||
Eric Stang
|
17,640 | 39,888(11 | ) | 43,807(1 | )(11) | 101,335 |
(1) | Amounts shown do not reflect compensation actually received by the non-employee directors. Instead, the amounts shown are the dollar amounts, disregarding the estimate of forfeitures related to service-based vesting conditions, recognized for financial statement reporting purposes by us in fiscal year 2008 for stock option awards in accordance with the provisions of SFAS 123(R). Stock compensation expense calculations for financial statement purposes spread the grant date cost of those awards over the vesting period. Therefore, amounts in this column include the unadjusted period expense for awards granted in fiscal year 2008. The assumptions used to calculate the value of stock option awards are set forth under Note 7 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008. | |
(2) | Reflects the compensation costs recognized in 2008 associated with a restricted stock unit award of 12,383 shares of Common stock made on October 1, 2008 with a fair value as of the grant date of $12.92 per share disregarding forfeiture assumptions. Mr. Bentley also had options to purchase an aggregate of 92,917 shares outstanding as of December 31, 2008. | |
(3) | Reflects the compensation costs recognized in 2008 associated with a restricted stock unit award of 12,383 shares of Common stock made on October 1, 2008 with a fair value as of the grant date of $12.92 per share disregarding forfeiture assumptions. Dr. Chou also had options to purchase an aggregate of 80,000 shares outstanding as of December 31, 2008. |
43
(4) | Reflects the compensation costs recognized in 2008 associated with a restricted stock unit award of 12,383 shares of Common stock made on October 1, 2008 with a fair value as of the grant date of $12.92 per share disregarding forfeiture assumptions. Mr. Dunlevie also had options to purchase an aggregate of 180,000 shares outstanding as of December 31, 2008. | |
(5) | Reflects the compensation costs recognized in 2008 associated with a restricted stock unit award of 12,383 shares of Common stock made on October 1, 2008 with a fair value as of the grant date of $12.92 per share disregarding forfeiture assumptions. Dr. Farmwald also had options to purchase an aggregate of 100,000 shares outstanding as of December 31, 2008. | |
(6) | Reflects the compensation costs recognized in 2008 associated with a restricted stock unit award of 12,383 shares of Common stock made on October 1, 2008 with a fair value as of the grant date of $12.92 per share disregarding forfeiture assumptions. Ms. Herscher also had options to purchase an aggregate of 60,000 shares outstanding as of December 31, 2008. | |
(7) | Reflects the fees paid to Dr. Kennedy until his resignation from the Board on July 1, 2008. Dr. Kennedy had options to purchase an aggregate of 104,166 shares outstanding and exercisable as of July 1, 2008. Other compensation reported in fiscal year 2008 relates to the exercise of his options. | |
(8) | Reflects the compensation costs recognized in 2008 associated with a restricted stock unit award of 12,383 shares of Common stock made on October 1, 2008 with a fair value as of the grant date of $12.92 per share disregarding forfeiture assumptions. Mr. Shrigley also had options to purchase an aggregate of 60,000 shares outstanding as of December 31, 2008. | |
(9) | Mr. Sofaer elected to receive 2,950 shares of Common Stock in lieu of board fees for fiscal year 2008. The respective closing values to determine the amount of shares issued was $23.31 on March 31, 2008; $19.07 on June 30, 2008; $12.85 on September 30, 2008; and $15.92 on December 31, 2008. | |
(10) | Reflects the compensation costs recognized in 2008 associated with a restricted stock unit award of 12,383 shares of Common stock made on October 1, 2008 with a fair value as of the grant date of $12.92 per share disregarding forfeiture assumptions. Mr. Sofaer also had options to purchase an aggregate of 80,000 shares outstanding as of December 31, 2008. | |
(11) | Reflects the compensation costs recognized in 2008 associated with a restricted stock unit award of 12,383 shares of Common stock made on October 1, 2008 with a fair value as of the grant date of $12.92 per share disregarding forfeiture assumptions. Mr. Stang also had options to purchase an aggregate of 40,000 shares outstanding as of December 31, 2008 that were granted on July 22, 2008 upon joining the Board. |
44
45
The following is the report of the Audit Committee of our Board of Directors with respect to our audited financial statements for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008, which include our consolidated balance sheets as of December 31, 2008 and 2007 and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders equity and comprehensive income, and cash flows for each of the fiscal years ended December 31, 2008, December 31, 2007 and December 31, 2006, and the notes thereto. | ||
The Audit Committee has reviewed and discussed our audited financial statements and managements report on internal control over financial reporting with management. | ||
Review and Discussions with the Independent
Registered Public Accounting Firm
|
The Audit Committee has discussed with PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, our independent registered public accounting firm, the matters required to be discussed by SAS 61 (Codification of Statements on Auditing Standards), as may be modified or supplemented, which includes, among other items, matters related to the conduct of the audit of our financial statements. The Audit Committee has also received written disclosures and the letter from PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP required by Independence Standards Board Standard No. 1 (Independence Discussions with Audit Committees) (which relates to the auditors independence from us and our related entities), as may be modified or supplemented, and has discussed with PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP its independence from us. | |
Based on the review and discussions referred to above, the Audit Committee recommended to the Board of Directors that our audited financial statements be included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008 for filing with the SEC. | ||
Respectfully submitted by:
|
THE AUDIT COMMITTEE OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS |
|
|
J. Thomas Bentley, Chairman Sunlin Chou Abraham D. Sofaer |
46
* |
$100 invested on 12/31/03 in stock & index-including
reinvestment of dividends. Fiscal year ending December 31. |
12/03 | 12/04 | 12/05 | 12/06 | 12/07 | 12/08 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Rambus Inc.
|
100.00 | 74.92 | 52.74 | 61.66 | 68.21 | 51.86 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
NASDAQ Composite
|
100.00 | 110.08 | 112.88 | 126.51 | 138.13 | 80.47 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
RDG Semiconductor Composite
|
100.00 | 79.86 | 89.16 | 84.15 | 94.72 | 47.83 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
47
48
| to attract and retain the best available personnel for positions of substantial responsibility, | |
| to provide incentives to individuals who perform services to the Company, and | |
| to promote the success of the Companys business. |
A-1
A-2
A-3
A-4
A-5
A-6
A-7
10. | Performance Units and Performance Shares. |
A-8
A-9
A-10
A-11
A-12
A-13
ATTN: SECRETARY
4440 EL CAMINO REAL
LOS ALTOS, CA 94022
VOTE BY INTERNET www.proxyvote.com Use the Internet to transmit your voting instructions and for electronic delivery of information up until 11:59 P.M. Eastern Time on April 29, 2009. Have your proxy card in hand when you access the web site and follow the instructions to obtain your records and to create an electronic voting instruction form. ELECTRONIC DELIVERY OF FUTURE PROXY MATERIALS If you would like to reduce the costs incurred by our company in mailing proxy materials, you can consent to receiving all future proxy statements, proxy cards and annual reports electronically via e-mail or the Internet. To sign up for electronic delivery, please follow the instructions above to vote using the Internet and, when prompted, indicate that you agree to receive or access proxy materials electronically in future years. VOTE BY PHONE 1-800-690-6903 Use any touch-tone telephone to transmit your voting instructions up until 11:59 P.M. Eastern Time on April 29, 2009. Have your proxy card in hand when you call and then follow the instructions. VOTE BY MAIL Mark, sign and date your proxy card and return it in the postage-paid envelope we have provided or return it to Vote Processing, c/o Broadridge, 51 Mercedes Way, Edgewood, NY 11717. TO VOTE, MARK BLOCKS BELOW IN BLUE OR BLACK INK AS FOLLOWS: M11279 KEEP THIS PORTION FOR YOUR RECORDS DETACH AND RETURN THIS PORTION ONLY THIS PROXY CARD IS VALID ONLY WHEN SIGNED AND DATED. RAMBUS INC. For Withhold For All All All Except nominee(s), mark For All Except and write the number(s) of the nominee(s) on the line below. 1. Election of Class II Directors Nominees: 01) J. Thomas Bentley 02) P. Michael Farmwald 03) Penelope A. Herscher 04) David Shrigley 05) Eric Stang For Against Abstain 2. Approval of an amendment to the 2006 Equity Incentive Plan to increase the number of shares of common stock of the Company reserved for issuance thereunder by 6,500,000 shares. 3. Ratification of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as independent registered accounting firm of the Company for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2009. Please sign exactly as your name appears above. When shares are registered in the names of two or more persons, whether as joint tenants, as community property or otherwise, both or all of such persons should sign. When signing as attorney, executor, administrator, trustee, guardian or in another fiduciary capacity, please give full title as such. If a corporation, please sign in full corporate name by President or other authorized person. If a partnership, please sign in partnerships name by authorized person. Signature [PLEASE SIGN WITHIN BOX] Date Signature (Joint Owners) Date ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS APRIL 30, 2009 |
9:00 a.m., local time Crowne Plaza Cabana Hotel 4290 El Camino Real Palo Alto, California 94306
Directions to the Crowne Plaza Cabana Hotel:
From San Francisco Airport (~20 miles) or 101 North: Head South on 101 for about 15 miles. Take the San Antonio Road South exit. Go approximately 3 miles to El Camino Real. Turn right onto El Camino Real and proceed 3 blocks. The hotel is on your left side. From San Jose Airport (~12 miles) or 101 South: Head North on 101 for about 8 miles. Take the San Antonio Road South exit. Go approximately 3 miles to El Camino Real. Turn right onto El Camino Real and proceed 3 blocks. The hotel is on your left side. From 280 North or South: Take the El Monte exit to Foothill Expressway and turn left onto Foothill Expressway. At the next light, San Antonio Road, turn right. Go approximately 3 miles, then turn left onto El Camino Real. Proceed 3 blocks. The hotel is on your left side. Important Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials for the Annual Meeting: The Notice and Proxy Statement, Annual Report to Shareholders and 10-K Combo document are available at www.proxyvote.com. M11280 Rambus Inc. PROXY FOR THE ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS TO BE HELD APRIL 30, 2009. THIS PROXY IS SOLICITED ON BEHALF OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF RAMBUS INC. The undersigned stockholder of Rambus Inc., a Delaware corporation (the Company), hereby acknowledges receipt of the Notice of Annual Meeting of Stockholders and accompanying Proxy Statement, each dated March 16, 2009, and hereby appoints Harold Hughes and Thomas R. Lavelle, and each of them as proxies and attorneys-in-fact, each with full power of substitution to represent the undersigned at the Annual Meeting of Stockholders of Rambus Inc. to be held on April 30, 2009 at 9:00 a.m. local time, at the Crowne Plaza Cabana Hotel, 4290 El Camino Real, Palo Alto, California 94306, and at any adjournment or postponement thereof, and to vote all shares of common stock of the Company held of record by the undersigned as hereinafter specified upon the proposals listed on the reverse side. THIS PROXY, WHEN PROPERLY EXECUTED, WILL BE VOTED IN THE MANNER DIRECTED HEREIN. IF NO SPECIFICATION IS MADE, THIS PROXY WILL BE VOTED FOR THE PROPOSALS ON THE REVERSE SIDE AND, AS THE PROXIES DEEM ADVISABLE, ON SUCH OTHER MATTERS AS MAY PROPERLY COME BEFORE THE MEETING OR MAY OTHERWISE BE ALLOWED TO BE CONSIDERED AT THE MEETING. THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS A VOTE FOR EACH OF THE PROPOSALS OUTLINED ON THE REVERSE SIDE. IN ORDER TO ASSURE YOUR REPRESENTATION AT THE ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS, PLEASE MARK, SIGN, DATE AND RETURN THIS PROXY CARD PROMPTLY IN THE ENCLOSED ENVELOPE. SEE REVERSE SEE REVERSE SIDE SIDE CONTINUED AND TO BE SIGNED ON REVERSE SIDE |