e10vq
Table of Contents

 
 
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D. C. 20549
 
FORM 10-Q
(Mark One)
     
þ   QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2008
OR
     
o   TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the transition period from                      to                     
Commission file number 1-11953
Willbros Group, Inc.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
     
Republic of Panama
(Jurisdiction of incorporation)
  98-0160660
(I.R.S. Employer Identification Number)
Plaza 2000 Building
50th Street, 8th Floor
P.O. Box 0816-01098
Panama, Republic of Panama
Telephone No.: +50-7-213-0947

(Address, including zip code, and telephone number, including
area code, of principal executive offices of registrant)
NOT APPLICABLE
 
(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ     Noo
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in
Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
             
Large accelerated filer þ   Accelerated filer o   Non-accelerated filer o   Smaller reporting company o
        (Do not check if a smaller reporting company)    
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes o     Noþ
The number of shares of the registrant’s Common Stock, $.05 par value, outstanding as of October 31, 2008 was 39,199,222.
 
 

 


 

WILLBROS GROUP, INC.
FORM 10-Q
FOR QUARTER ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2008
         
    Page
       
 
       
 
    3  
 
    4  
 
    5  
 
    6  
 
    8  
 
    25  
 
    38  
 
    38  
 
       
 
    39  
 
    39  
 
    41  
 
    41  
 
    41  
 
    41  
 
    41  
 
    42  
 
    43  
 EX-31.1
 EX-31.2
 EX-32.1
 EX-32.2

2


Table of Contents

WILLBROS GROUP, INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(In thousands, except share and per share amounts)
(Unaudited)
PART I — FINANCIAL INFORMATION
ITEM 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
                 
    September 30,     December 31,  
    2008     2007  
ASSETS
Current assets:
               
Cash and cash equivalents
  $ 127,552     $ 92,886  
Accounts receivable, net of allowance of $1,217 and $1,108
    266,985       251,746  
Contract cost and recognized income not yet billed
    81,815       49,233  
Prepaid expenses
    14,683       7,555  
Parts and supplies inventories
    3,381       2,902  
Assets held for sale
    13,607        
Assets of discontinued operations
    2,673       3,211  
 
           
Total current assets
    510,696       407,533  
 
Property, plant and equipment, net of accumulated depreciation of $118,032 and $97,268
    159,186       159,766  
Goodwill
    143,653       143,241  
Other intangible assets
    42,378       50,206  
Deferred tax assets
    7,227       7,769  
Other assets
    7,882       10,898  
 
           
Total assets
  $ 871,022     $ 779,413  
 
           
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Current liabilities:
               
Current portion of capital lease obligations
  $ 12,880     $ 12,132  
Notes payable and current portion of other long-term debt
    4,275       1,040  
Current portion of government obligations
    6,575       8,075  
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities
    200,200       156,342  
Contract billings in excess of cost and recognized income
    21,943       22,868  
Accrued income taxes
    1,131       4,750  
Liabilities of discontinued operations
    637       978  
 
           
Total current liabilities
    247,641       206,185  
 
2.75% convertible senior notes
    59,357       68,000  
6.5% senior convertible notes
    32,050       32,050  
Capital lease obligations
    36,683       39,090  
Long-term portion of government obligations
    13,150       24,225  
Other long-term debt
          34  
Deferred tax liabilities
    9,345       6,879  
Long-term liability for unrecognized tax benefits
    6,154       6,612  
Other liabilities
    237       237  
 
           
Total liabilities
    404,617       383,312  
 
Contingencies and commitments (Note 12)
               
 
Stockholders’ equity:
               
Class A preferred stock, par value $.01 per share, 1,000,000 shares authorized, none issued
           
Common stock, par value $.05 per share, 70,000,000 shares authorized; 39,570,886 shares issued (38,276,545 at December 31, 2007)
    1,978       1,913  
Capital in excess of par value
    575,591       556,223  
Accumulated deficit
    (114,664 )     (175,936 )
Treasury stock at cost, 372,803 shares (222,839 at December 31, 2007)
    (8,084 )     (3,298 )
Accumulated other comprehensive income
    11,584       17,199  
 
           
Total stockholders’ equity
    466,405       396,101  
 
           
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity
  $ 871,022     $ 779,413  
 
           
See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

3


Table of Contents

WILLBROS GROUP, INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(In thousands, except share and per share amounts)
(Unaudited)
                                 
    Three Months     Nine Months  
    Ended September 30,     Ended September 30,  
    2008     2007     2008     2007  
Contract revenue
  $ 490,651     $ 246,716     $ 1,450,002     $ 610,168  
 
Operating expenses:
                               
Contract
    430,192       212,237       1,256,680       550,995  
Amortization of intangibles
    2,586             7,828        
General and administrative
    29,138       17,757       85,939       43,313  
Government fines
          (2,000 )           22,000  
 
                       
 
    461,916       227,994       1,350,447       616,308  
 
                       
Operating income (loss)
    28,735       18,722       99,555       (6,140 )
 
                               
Other income (expense):
                               
Interest income
    799       1,029       2,592       4,433  
Interest expense
    (2,484 )     (2,071 )     (7,671 )     (6,552 )
Other, net
    58       (1,327 )     204       (2,019 )
Loss on early extinguishment of debt
                      (15,375 )
 
                       
 
    (1,627 )     (2,369 )     (4,875 )     (19,513 )
 
                       
Income (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes
    27,108       16,353       94,680       (25,653 )
 
                               
Provision for income taxes
    8,057       6,081       36,450       7,793  
 
                       
Net income (loss) from continuing operations
    19,051       10,272       58,230       (33,446 )
Income (loss) from discontinued operations net of provision for income taxes
    1,219       (9,126 )     3,042       (21,494 )
 
                       
Net income (loss)
  $ 20,270     $ 1,146     $ 61,272     $ (54,940 )
 
                       
 
Basic income (loss) per common share:
                               
Income (loss) from continuing operations
  $ 0.50     $ 0.36     $ 1.52     $ (1.22 )
Income (loss) from discontinued operations
    0.03       (0.32 )     0.08       (0.78 )
 
                       
Net income (loss)
  $ 0.53     $ 0.04     $ 1.60     $ (2.00 )
 
                       
 
                               
Diluted income (loss) per common share:
                               
Income (loss) from continuing operations
  $ 0.46     $ 0.32     $ 1.41     $ (1.22 )
Income (loss) from discontinued operations
    0.03       (0.26 )     0.07       (0.78 )
 
                       
Net income (loss)
  $ 0.49     $ 0.06     $ 1.48     $ (2.00 )
 
                       
 
Weighted average number of common shares outstanding:
                               
Basic
    38,313,997       28,804,907       38,236,508       27,421,927  
 
                       
Diluted
    43,803,235       34,844,482       43,864,307       27,421,927  
 
                       
See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

4


Table of Contents

WILLBROS GROUP, INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
AND COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)
(In thousands, except share and per share amounts)
(Unaudited)
                                                         
                                            Accumulated        
                                            Other        
                    Capital in                     Comprehen-     Total  
    Common Stock     Excess of     Accumulated     Treasury     sive Income     Stockholders’  
    Shares     Par Value     Par Value     Deficit     Stock     (Loss)     Equity  
Balance, December 31, 2007
    38,276,545     $ 1,913     $ 556,223     $ (175,936 )   $ (3,298 )   $ 17,199     $ 396,101  
Comprehensive income:
                                                       
Net income
                      61,272                   61,272  
Foreign currency translation adjustment
                                  (5,615 )     (5,615 )
 
                                                     
Total comprehensive income
                                                    55,657  
Deferred compensation expense
                7,080                         7,080  
Deferred compensation tax benefit
                3,277                         3,277  
Deferred restricted stock rights issuance
    225,000       11       (11 )                        
Restricted stock grants
    552,159       28       (28 )                        
Vesting of restricted stock rights
    20,269       1       (1 )                        
Additions to treasury stock, vesting and forfeitures of restricted stock
                            (4,786 )           (4,786 )
Exercise of stock options
    53,000       3       681                         684  
Additional costs of public offering
                (251 )                       (251 )
Stock issued on conversion of 2.75% convertible senior notes
    443,913       22       8,621                         8,643  
 
                                         
Balance, September 30, 2008
    39,570,886     $ 1,978     $ 575,591     $ (114,664 )   $ (8,084 )   $ 11,584     $ 466,405  
 
                                         
See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

5


Table of Contents

WILLBROS GROUP, INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(In thousands, except share and per share amounts)
(Unaudited)
                 
    Nine Months  
    Ended September 30,  
    2008     2007  
Cash flows from operating activities:
               
Net income (loss)
  $ 61,272     $ (54,940 )
Reconciliation of net income (loss) to net cash provided by operating activities:
               
(Income) loss from discontinued operations
    (3,042 )     21,494  
Depreciation and amortization
    33,988       13,223  
Amortization of deferred compensation, net
    7,080       3,010  
Amortization of debt issuance costs
    1,189       1,557  
Deferred compensation tax benefit
    (3,277 )      
Deferred income tax provision
    6,885       1,063  
Loss (gain) on sales of property, plant and equipment
    206       (716 )
Provision for bad debts
    1,215       181  
Equity in joint ventures
    (123 )      
Government fines
          22,000  
Loss on early extinguishment of debt
          15,375  
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
               
Accounts receivable, net
    (19,931 )     (36,923 )
Contract cost and recognized income not yet billed
    (35,405 )     (15,226 )
Prepaid expenses
    5,706       11,239  
Parts and supplies inventories
    (512 )     (704 )
Other assets
    758       (879 )
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities
    45,188       3,466  
Contract billings in excess of cost and recognized income
    (783 )     (6,772 )
Accrued income taxes
    (3,590 )     608  
Long-term liability for unrecognized tax benefits
    (330 )     315  
 
           
Cash provided by (used in) operating activities of continuing operations
    96,494       (22,629 )
Cash provided by operating activities of discontinued operations
    3,531       2,980  
 
           
Cash provided by (used in) operating activities
    100,025       (19,649 )
Cash flows from investing activities:
               
Purchases of property, plant and equipment
    (28,122 )     (15,890 )
Rebates from purchases of property, plant and equipment
    1,915        
Proceeds from sales of property, plant and equipment
    1,418       1,428  
Acquisition of subsidiaries
    846       (24,154 )
Proceeds from the sale of discontinued operations, net
          105,568  
 
           
Cash provided by (used in) investing activities of continuing operations
    (23,943 )     66,952  
Cash used in investing activities of discontinued operations
           
 
           
Cash provided by (used in) investing activities
    (23,943 )     66,952  
Cash flows from financing activities:
               
Payments on capital leases
    (17,550 )     (7,507 )
Payments of government fines
    (12,575 )      
Repayment of notes payable
    (9,550 )     (8,665 )
Acquisition of treasury stock
    (4,786 )     (513 )
Deferred compensation tax benefit
    3,277        
Proceeds from exercise of stock options
    684       1,519  
Additional costs of public offering of common stock
    (251 )      
Costs of debt issues
    (166 )     (286 )
Loss on early extinguishment of debt
          (12,993 )
 
           
Cash used in financing activities of continuing operations
    (40,917 )     (28,445 )
Cash used in financing activities of discontinued operations
           
 
           
Cash used in financing activities
    (40,917 )     (28,445 )
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents
    (499 )     2,208  
 
           
Cash provided by all activities
    34,666       21,066  
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period
    92,886       37,643  
 
           
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period
  $ 127,552     $ 58,709  
 
           

6


Table of Contents

WILLBROS GROUP, INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(In thousands, except share and per share amounts)
(Unaudited)
                 
    Nine Months
    Ended September 30,
    2008   2007
Supplemental disclosures of cash flow information:
               
Cash paid for interest (including discontinued operations)
  $ 6,287     $ 5,659  
Cash paid for income taxes (including discontinued operations)
  $ 34,651     $ 8,438  
 
               
Supplemental non-cash investing and financing transactions:
               
Equipment and property obtained by capital leases
  $ 17,863     $ 29,780  
Prepaid insurance obtained by note payable
  $ 12,754     $ 10,051  
Common stock issued for conversion of 2.75% convertible senior notes
  $ 8,643     $  
Deposit applied to capital lease obligation
  $ 1,432     $  
Deferred government obligation payments
  $     $ 32,300  
See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

7


Table of Contents

WILLBROS GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(In thousands, except share and per share amounts)
(Unaudited)
1. The Company and Basis of Presentation
     Willbros Group, Inc., a Republic of Panama corporation, and all of its majority-owned subsidiaries (the “Company,” “Willbros” or “WGI”) is an independent international contractor serving the oil, gas and power industries; government entities; and the refinery and petrochemical industries. The Company’s principal markets for continuing operations are the United States, Canada and Oman. The Company obtains its work through competitive bidding and through negotiations with prospective clients. Contract values may range from several thousand dollars to several hundred million dollars and contract durations range from a few weeks to more than two years.
     The accompanying Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet as of December 31, 2007, which has been derived from audited consolidated financial statements, and the unaudited interim Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements as of September 30, 2008, have been prepared pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”). Accordingly, certain information and note disclosures normally included in annual financial statements prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles have been condensed or omitted pursuant to those rules and regulations. The Company believes the presentations and disclosures herein are adequate to make the information not misleading. Certain prior period amounts have been reclassified to be consistent with current presentation. These unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements should be read in conjunction with the Company’s December 31, 2007 audited Consolidated Financial Statements and notes thereto contained in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007.
     In the opinion of management, the unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements reflect all adjustments necessary to present fairly the financial position as of September 30, 2008, the results of operations and cash flows of the Company for all interim periods presented, and stockholders’ equity for the nine months ended September 30, 2008.
     The Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements include certain estimates and assumptions by management. These estimates and assumptions relate to the reported amounts of assets and liabilities at the date of the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements and the reported amounts of revenue and expense during the periods. Significant items subject to such estimates and assumptions include the carrying amount of property, plant and equipment, goodwill and parts and supplies inventories; quantification of amounts recorded for contingencies, tax accruals and certain other accrued liabilities; valuation allowances for accounts receivable and deferred income tax assets; and revenue recognition under the percentage-of-completion method of accounting, including estimates of progress toward completion and estimates of gross profit or loss accrual on contracts in progress. The Company bases its estimates on historical experience and other assumptions that it believes relevant under the circumstances. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
     As discussed in Note 13 – Discontinuance of Operations, Asset Disposals, and Transition Services Agreement, the Company has disposed of certain assets and operations that are together classified as discontinued operations (collectively the “Discontinued Operations”). Accordingly, these Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements reflect these operations as discontinued operations in all periods presented. The disclosures in the Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements relate to continuing operations except as otherwise indicated.
     As of September 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007, respectively, the Company had $9,492 and $2,686 of cash and cash equivalents committed to specific project uses.
2. New Accounting Pronouncements
     SFAS No. 157
     In September 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Statements of Financial Accounting Standards No. 157, “Fair Value Measurements” (“SFAS No. 157”). SFAS No. 157 applies to other accounting pronouncements that require or permit fair value measurements and is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007 and interim periods within those fiscal years. On January 1, 2008, the Company adopted the provisions of SFAS No. 157 related to financial assets and liabilities and to nonfinancial assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis. The adoption of this accounting pronouncement did not result in a material impact to the consolidated financial statements. 
     In February 2008, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position (“FSP”) Financial Accounting Standard 157-1, “Application of FASB Statement No. 157 to FASB Statement No. 13 and Other Accounting Pronouncements That Address Fair Value Measurements for Purposes of Lease Classification or Measurement under Statement 13”, which removes certain leasing transactions from the scope of SFAS No. 157, and FSP Financial Accounting Standard 157-2, “Effective Date of FASB Statement No. 157”, which defers the effective date of SFAS No. 157 for one year for certain nonfinancial assets and nonfinancial liabilities, except those that are recognized or disclosed at fair value in the financial statements on a recurring basis. In October 2008, the FASB also issued FSP SFAS 157-3, “Determining the Fair Value of a Financial Asset When the Market for That Asset is Not Actvie, ” which clarifies the application of SFAS No. 157 in an inactive market and illustrates how an entity would determine fair value when the market for a financial asset is not active. Beginning January 1, 2009, the Company will adopt the provisions for nonfinancial assets and nonfinancial liabilities that are not required or permitted to be measured at fair value on a recurring basis, which include those measured at fair value in goodwill impairment testing, indefinite-lived intangible assets measured at fair value for impairment assessment, nonfinancial long-lived assets measured at fair value for impairment assessment, asset retirement obligations initially measured at fair value, and those initially measured at fair value in a business

8


Table of Contents

WILLBROS GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(In thousands, except share and per share amounts)
(Unaudited)
2. New Accounting Pronouncements (continued)
combination. The Company is currently assessing the impact the adoption of this pronouncement will have on its financial statements. The Company does not expect the provisions of SFAS No. 157 related to these items to have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements.
     SFAS No. 159
     In February 2007, the FASB released Statements of Financial Accounting Standards No. 159, “The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities” (“SFAS No. 159”), which is effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007. SFAS No. 159 permits entities to choose to measure many financial instruments and certain other items at fair value. SFAS No. 159 is effective for the Company’s fiscal year ending December 31, 2008. The Company does not expect to use the fair value option for any financial assets and financial liabilities that are not currently recorded at fair value.
     SFAS No. 141-R
     In December 2007, the FASB released Statements of Financial Accounting Standards No. 141-R, “Business Combinations” (“SFAS No. 141R”). SFAS No. 141R applies prospectively to business combinations for which the acquisition date is on or after the beginning of the first annual reporting period beginning on or after December 15, 2008, which are business combinations in the year ending December 31, 2009 for the Company. Early adoption is prohibited. SFAS No. 141R establishes principles and requirements for how an acquirer recognizes and measures in its financial statements the identifiable assets acquired, the liabilities assumed, any non-controlling interest and the goodwill acquired. Additionally, transaction costs that are currently capitalized under current accounting guidance will be required to be expensed as incurred under SFAS No. 141R. SFAS No. 141R also establishes disclosure requirements which will enable users to evaluate the nature and financial effects of the business combination.
       SFAS No. 160
     In December 2007, the FASB released Statements of Financial Accounting Standards No. 160, “Non-controlling Interests in Consolidated Financial Statements — an amendment of ARB No. 51” (“SFAS No. 160”). SFAS No. 160 is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning on or after December 15, 2008. Early adoption is prohibited. SFAS No. 160 establishes reporting requirements that provide sufficient disclosure that clearly identify and distinguish between the interests of non-controlling owners and the interest of the parent. The Company is currently assessing the impact the adoption of this pronouncement will have on its financial statements.
     FSP No. APB 14-1
     In May 2008, the FASB issued FSP No. APB 14-1, “Accounting for Convertible Debt Instruments That May Be Settled in Cash upon Conversion (Including Partial Cash Settlement)”. This FSP clarifies that convertible debt instruments that may be settled in cash upon conversion (including partial cash settlement) are not addressed by APB Opinion No. 14. Additionally, this FSP specifies that issuers of such instruments should separately account for the liability and equity components in a manner that will reflect the entity’s nonconvertible debt borrowing rate when interest cost is recognized in subsequent periods. This statement is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008, and interim periods within those fiscal years. Early adoption is prohibited. The Company is currently assessing the impact the adoption of this pronouncement will have on its financial statements.
     FSP No. FAS 142-3
     In April 2008, the FASB issued FSP No. FAS 142-3, “Determination of the Useful Life of Intangible Assets.” This FSP amends the factors that should be considered in developing renewal or extension assumptions used to determine the useful life of a recognized intangible asset under FASB Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 142 (“SFAS No. 142”). The intent of this FSP is to improve the consistency between the useful life of a recognized intangible asset under SFAS No. 142, the period of expected cash flows used to measure the fair value of the asset under SFAS No. 141R and other U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. This statement is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008 and interim periods within those fiscal years. Early adoption is prohibited. The Company is currently assessing the impact the adoption of this pronouncement will have on its financial statements.
3. Contracts in Progress
     Contract cost and recognized income not yet billed on uncompleted contracts arise when recorded revenues for a contract exceed the amounts billed under the terms of the contracts. Contract billings in excess of cost and recognized income arise when billed amounts exceed revenues recorded. Amounts are billable to customers upon various measures of performance, including achievement of certain milestones, completion of specified units or completion of the contract. Also included in contract cost and recognized income not yet billed on uncompleted contracts are amounts the Company seeks to collect from customers for change orders approved in scope but not for price associated with that scope change (unapproved change orders). Revenue for these amounts is recorded equal to the lesser of the expected revenue or cost incurred when realization of price approval is probable. Estimating revenues from unapproved change

9


Table of Contents

WILLBROS GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(In thousands, except share and per share amounts)
(Unaudited)
3. Contracts in Progress (continued)
orders involve the use of estimates, and it is reasonably possible that revisions to the estimated recoverable amounts of recorded unapproved change orders may be made in the near-term. If the Company does not successfully resolve these matters, a reduction in revenues may be required to amounts that have been previously recorded.
     Contract cost and recognized income not yet billed and related amounts billed as of September 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007 was as follows:
                 
    September 30,     December 31,  
    2008     2007  
Cost incurred on contracts in progress
  $ 1,088,970     $ 720,799  
Recognized income
    140,789       74,228  
 
           
 
    1,229,759       795,027  
Progress billings and advance payments
    (1,169,887 )     (768,662 )
 
           
 
  $ 59,872     $ 26,365  
 
           
 
               
Contract cost and recognized income not yet billed
  $ 81,815     $ 49,233  
Contract billings in excess of cost and recognized income
    (21,943 )     (22,868 )
 
           
 
  $ 59,872     $ 26,365  
 
           
     Contract cost and recognized income not yet billed includes $340 and $86 at September 30, 2008, and December 31, 2007, respectively, on completed contracts.
4. Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets
     The changes in the carrying amount of goodwill for the nine months ended September 30, 2008, by business segment, are detailed below:
                         
    Upstream     Downstream        
    O&G     O&G     Consolidated  
Balance as of December 31, 2007
  $ 12,818     $ 130,423     $ 143,241  
Purchase price adjustments
    (581 )     1,095       514  
Translation adjustments and other
    (102 )           (102 )
 
                 
Balance as of September 30, 2008
  $ 12,135     $ 131,518     $ 143,653  
 
                 
     The purchase price adjustments in the table above are due to changes in the estimated fair value assigned to the assets and liabilities acquired and contractual working capital adjustments made during the one year estimation period following the consummation of the transaction.
The Company’s intangible assets as of September 30, 2008 were as follows:
                         
    Customer              
    Relationships     Backlog     Total  
Gross carrying amount
  $ 40,500     $ 10,500     $ 51,000  
Less: accumulated amortization
    (2,791     (5,831     (8,622
 
                 
Total amortizable intangible assets, net
  $ 37,709     $ 4,669     $ 42,378  
 
                 
 
Weighted average remaining amortization period
  11.3 yrs     0.7 yrs          
     These amortizable intangible assets are included in the assets of the Company’s Downstream O&G segment. Intangible assets are amortized on a straight-line basis over their estimated useful lives, which range from 1.5 to 12.1 years.

10


Table of Contents

WILLBROS GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(In thousands, except share and per share amounts)
(Unaudited)
4. Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets (continued)
     Amortization expense included in net income for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2008 was $2,586 and $7,828, respectively. Estimated amortization expense for the remainder of 2008 and each of the subsequent five years and thereafter is as follows:
         
Fiscal year:        
2008
  $ 2,588  
2009
    6,268  
2010
    3,352  
2011
    3,352  
2012
    3,352  
2013
    3,352  
Thereafter
    20,114  
 
     
Total amortization
  $ 42,378  
 
     
5. Government Obligations
     Government obligations represent amounts due to government entities, specifically the United States Department of Justice (“DOJ”) and the SEC, in final settlement of the investigations involving violations of the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (the “FCPA”) and violations of the Securities Act of 1933 and the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. These investigations stem primarily from the Company’s former operations in Bolivia, Ecuador and Nigeria. In May 2008, the Company reached final agreements with the DOJ and the SEC to settle their investigations. As previously disclosed the agreements provided for an aggregate payment of $32,300. The Company will pay $22,000 in fines to the DOJ related to the FCPA violations, consisting of $10,000 paid on signing and $4,000 annually for three years thereafter, with no interest due on unpaid amounts. The Company will pay $10,300 to the SEC, consisting of $8,900 of profit disgorgement and $1,400 of pre-judgment interest, payable in four equal installments of $2,575 with the first installment paid on signing and annually for three years thereafter. Post-judgment interest will be payable on the outstanding $7,725.
     During the nine months ended September 30, 2008, $12,575 of the aggregate obligation was relieved, which consisted of the initial $10,000 payment to the DOJ and the first installment of $2,575 to the SEC, inclusive of all pre-judgment interest.
     The remaining aggregate obligation of $19,725 has been classified on the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets as $6,575 in “Current portion of government obligations” and $13,150 in “Long-term portion of government obligations.” This division is based on payment terms that provide for three remaining equal installments of $2,575 and $4,000 to the SEC and DOJ, respectively.
6. Long-term Debt
     Long-term debt as of September 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007 was as follows:
                 
    September 30,     December 31,  
    2008     2007  
Capital lease obligations
  $ 49,563     $ 51,222  
2.75% convertible senior notes
    59,357       68,000  
6.5% senior convertible notes
    32,050       32,050  
Other long-term debt
    49       99  
2007 Credit Facility
           
 
           
Total long-term debt
    141,019       151,371  
Less: current portion
    (12,929 )     (12,197 )
 
           
Long-term debt, net
  $ 128,090     $ 139,174  
 
           
2007 Credit Facility
On November 20, 2007, the Company entered into a new credit agreement (the “Credit Agreement”), among Willbros USA, Inc., a subsidiary of the Company (“WUSA”), as borrower, the Company and certain of its subsidiaries as guarantors (collectively, the “Loan Parties”), and a group of lenders (the “Lenders”) led by Calyon New York Branch (“Calyon”). The Credit Agreement provides for a new three-year senior secured $150,000 revolving credit facility due 2010 (the “2007 Credit Facility”). The Company has the option, subject to obtaining commitment from one or more lenders and Calyon’s consent, to increase the size of the 2007 Credit Facility to $200,000 within the first two years of the closing date of the 2007 Credit Facility. The Company is able to utilize 100 percent of the 2007 Credit Facility to obtain performance letters of credit and 33.3 percent of the facility for cash advances for general corporate purposes

11


Table of Contents

WILLBROS GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(In thousands, except share and per share amounts)
(Unaudited)
6. Long-term Debt (continued)
and financial letters of credit. The 2007 Credit Facility is secured by substantially all of the assets of the Company, including those of the Loan Parties, as well as a pledge of 100 percent of the equity interests of WUSA and each of the Company’s other subsidiaries that are Loan Parties. The 2007 Credit Facility replaced the Company’s existing three-year $100,000 senior secured synthetic credit facility, which was scheduled to expire in October 2009.
     Unamortized debt issuance costs associated with the 2007 Credit Facility total $1,088 and $1,302 and are included in other assets at September 30, 2008, and December 31, 2007, respectively. These costs are being amortized to interest expense over the three-year term of the Credit Facility ending October 2010.
     The 2007 Credit Facility also requires compliance with the following financial covenants:
    A minimum net worth in an amount of not less than the sum of $223,819 plus 50 percent of consolidated net income earned in each fiscal quarter ended after September 30, 2008 plus adjustments for certain equity transactions;
 
    A maximum leverage ratio of 2.25 to 1.00 for the fiscal quarter ending September 30, 2008 and one fiscal quarter thereafter and a maximum leverage ratio of 2.00 to 1.00 for each fiscal quarter ending after December 31, 2008;
 
    A minimum fixed charge coverage ratio of not less than 3.25 to 1.00 for the fiscal quarter ending September 30, 2008 and one fiscal quarter thereafter and a fixed charge ratio of not less than 3.50 to 1.00 for each fiscal quarter ending after December 31, 2008; and
 
    If the Company’s liquidity during any fiscal quarter falls below $35,000, a maximum capital expenditure ratio of 1.50 to 1.00 (cost of assets added through purchase or capital lease) for such fiscal quarter and for each of the three quarters thereafter.
     If these covenants are violated, it would be considered an event of default entitling the lenders to terminate the remaining commitment, call all outstanding letters of credit, and accelerate payment of any principal and interest outstanding. At September 30, 2008, the Company was in compliance with all of these covenants.
     As of September 30, 2008, there were no borrowings outstanding under the 2007 Credit Facility and there were $34,010 in outstanding performance letters of credit consisting of $33,887 issued for projects in continuing operations and $123 issued for projects related to Discontinued Operations.
6.5% Senior Convertible Notes
     On December 22, 2005, the Company entered into a purchase agreement (the “Purchase Agreement”) for a private placement of $65,000 aggregate principal amount of its 6.5% Senior Convertible Notes due 2012 (the “6.5% Notes”). The private placement closed on December 23, 2005. During the first quarter of 2006, the initial purchasers of the 6.5% Notes exercised their options to purchase an additional $19,500 aggregate principal amount of the 6.5% Notes. Collectively, the primary offering and the purchase option of the 6.5% Notes totaled $84,500. The net proceeds of the offering were used to retire existing indebtedness and provide additional liquidity to support working capital needs.
     The 6.5% Notes are governed by an indenture, dated December 23, 2005, that was entered into by and among the Company, as issuer, WUSA, as guarantor and The Bank of New York Mellon Corporation, as Trustee (the “Indenture”), and were issued under the Purchase Agreement by and among the Company and the initial purchasers of the 6.5% Notes (the “Purchasers”), in a transaction exempt from the registration requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”). The 6.5% Notes are convertible into shares of the Company’s stock and these underlying shares have been registered with the SEC. The resale of the 6.5% Notes, however, has not been registered with the SEC.
     The 6.5% Notes are convertible into shares of the Company’s common stock at a conversion rate of 56.9606 shares of common stock per $1,000 principal amount of notes (representing a conversion price of approximately $17.56 per share resulting in 1,825,587 shares at September 30, 2008), subject to adjustment in certain circumstances. The 6.5% Notes are general senior unsecured obligations. Interest is due semi-annually on June 15 and December 15.
     As of September 30, 2008, $32,050 of aggregate principal amount of the 6.5% Notes remains outstanding. Unamortized debt issuance costs of $1,546 and $1,819 associated with the 6.5% Notes are included in other assets at September 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007, respectively, and are being amortized over the seven-year period ending December 2012.
     A covenant in the indenture for the 6.5% Notes prohibits the Company from incurring any additional indebtedness if its consolidated leverage ratio exceeds 4.00 to 1.00. As of September 30, 2008, this covenant would not have precluded the Company from borrowing under the 2007 Credit Facility.

12


Table of Contents

WILLBROS GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(In thousands, except share and per share amounts)
(Unaudited)
6. Long-term Debt (continued)
2.75% Convertible Senior Notes
     On March 12, 2004, the Company completed a primary offering of $60,000 of 2.75% Convertible Senior Notes (the “2.75% Notes”). On April 13, 2004, the initial purchasers of the 2.75% Notes exercised their option to purchase an additional $10,000 aggregate principal amount of the notes. Collectively, the primary offering and purchase option of the 2.75% Notes totaled $70,000. The 2.75% Notes are general senior unsecured obligations. Interest is paid semi-annually on March 15 and September 15 and payments began on September 15, 2004.
     The holders of the 2.75% Notes may, under certain circumstances, convert the notes into shares of the Company’s common stock at an initial conversion ratio of 51.3611 shares of common stock per $1,000 principal amount of notes (representing a conversion price of approximately $19.47 per share resulting in 3,048,641 shares at September 30, 2008 subject to adjustment in certain circumstances).
     On March 20, 2008, a holder exercised its right to convert, converting $8,643 in aggregate principal amount of the 2.75% Notes into 443,913 shares of the Company’s common stock. In connection with the conversion, the Company expensed a proportionate amount of its debt issuance costs resulting in additional period interest of $187.
     Unamortized debt issuance costs of $1,074 and $1,610 associated with the 2.75% Notes are included in other assets at September 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007, respectively, and are being amortized over the seven-year period ending March 2011.
Capital Leases
     The Company has entered into multiple capital lease agreements to acquire construction equipment and automobiles. In aggregate, these leases have interest rates ranging from 4.30% to 8.26% and have typical terms of at least 30 months.
     Assets held under capital leases at September 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007 are summarized below:
                 
    September 30,     December 31,  
    2008     2007  
Construction equipment
  $ 60,413     $ 56,171  
Autos, trucks and trailers
    4,458       4,282  
Furniture and office equipment
          535  
 
           
Total assets held under capital lease
    64,871       60,988  
Less: accumulated depreciation
    (14,968 )     (9,251 )
 
           
Net assets under capital lease
  $ 49,903     $ 51,737  
 
           
7. Income (Loss) Per Share
     Basic income (loss) per share is computed by dividing net income (loss) by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding for the period. Diluted income (loss) per share is based on the weighted average number of shares outstanding during each period plus the assumed exercise of potentially dilutive stock options and warrants, conversion of convertible debt, and vesting of restricted stock and restricted stock rights less the number of treasury shares assumed to be purchased using the average market price of the Company’s stock for each of the periods presented. The Company’s convertible notes, except when anti-dilutive, are included in the calculation of diluted income per share under the “if-converted” method. Additionally, diluted income per share for continuing operations is calculated excluding interest expense and amortization of debt issuance costs associated with the convertible notes since these notes are treated as if converted into common stock.

13


Table of Contents

WILLBROS GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(In thousands, except share and per share amounts)
(Unaudited)
7. Income (Loss) Per Share (continued)
     Basic and diluted income (loss) from continuing operations per common share for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2008 and 2007 are computed as follows:
                                 
    Three Months     Nine Months  
    Ended September 30,     Ended September 30,  
    2008     2007     2008     2007  
Net income (loss) from continuing operations (numerator for basic calculation)
  $ 19,051     $ 10,272     $ 58,230     $ (33,446 )
Add: Interest and debt issuance costs amortization associated with convertible notes
    1,129       780       3,642        
 
                       
Net income (loss) from continuing operations applicable to common shares (numerator for diluted calculation)
  $ 20,180     $ 11,052     $ 61,872     $ (33,446 )
 
                       
 
                               
Weighted average number of common shares outstanding for basic income (loss) per share
    38,313,997       28,804,907       38,236,508       27,421,927  
Weighted average number of potentially dilutive common shares outstanding
    5,489,238       6,039,575       5,627,799        
 
                       
Weighted average number of common shares outstanding for diluted income (loss) per share
    43,803,235       34,844,482       43,864,307       27,421,927  
 
                       
Income (loss) per common share from continuing operations:
                               
Basic
  $ 0.50     $ 0.36     $ 1.52     $ (1.22 )
 
                       
Diluted
  $ 0.46     $ 0.32     $ 1.41     $ (1.22 )
 
                       
     The Company incurred net losses for the nine months ended September 30, 2007, and has therefore excluded the securities listed below from the computation of diluted loss per share, as the effect would be anti-dilutive:
                 
    Nine Months  
    Ended September 30,  
    2008     2007  
2.75% Convertible senior notes
          3,595,277  
6.5% Senior convertible notes
          1,825,589  
Stock options
          686,750  
Warrants to purchase common stock
          558,354  
Restricted stock and restricted stock rights
          612,637  
 
           
 
          7,278,607  
 
           
     In accordance with Emerging Issues Task Force Issue 04-8, “The Effect of Contingently Convertible Instruments on Diluted Earnings per Share”, the 5,420,866 shares issuable upon conversion of both the 6.5% Notes and the 2.75% Notes would have been included in diluted earnings per share if those securities are dilutive, regardless of whether the conversion prices of $17.56 and $19.47, respectively, have been met.
8. Segment Information
     The Company’s segments are strategic business units that are managed separately as each has different operational requirements and strategies. With the acquisition of InServ on November 20, 2007, the Company redefined its operating segments based on industry segments served. The operating segments the Company now manages by and reports on are: Upstream O&G, Downstream O&G and Engineering. These segments operate primarily in the United States, Canada and Oman. Management evaluates the performance of each operating segment based on operating income. The Company’s corporate operations include the general, administrative and financing functions of the organization. The costs of these functions are allocated between the three operating segments. There were no material inter-segment revenues in the periods presented.

14


Table of Contents

WILLBROS GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(In thousands, except share and per share amounts)
(Unaudited)
8. Segment Information (continued)
     The following tables reflect the Company’s reconciliation of segment operating results to net income (loss) in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2008 and 2007:
     For the three months ended September 30, 2008:
                                 
    Upstream     Downstream              
    O&G     O&G     Engineering     Consolidated  
Revenue
  $ 342,064     $ 86,249     $ 62,338     $ 490,651  
Operating expenses
    325,036       81,526       55,354       461,916  
 
                       
Operating income
  $ 17,028     $ 4,723     $ 6,984       28,735  
 
                         
Other expense, net
                            (1,627 )
Provision for income taxes
                            8,057  
 
                             
Net income from continuing operations
                            19,051  
Income from discontinued operations net of provision for income taxes
                            1,219  
 
                             
Net income
                          $ 20,270  
 
                             
     For the three months ended September 30, 2007:
                                 
    Upstream     Downstream              
    O&G     O&G     Engineering     Consolidated  
Revenue
  $ 196,554     $     $ 50,162     $ 246,716  
Operating expenses
    183,121             46,873       229,994  
Government fines
                      (2,000 )
 
                       
Operating income
  $ 13,433     $     $ 3,289       18,722  
 
                         
Other expense, net
                            (2,369 )
Provision for income taxes
                            6,081  
 
                             
Net income from continuing operations
                            10,272  
Loss from discontinued operations net of provision for income taxes
                            (9,126 )
 
                             
Net income
                          $ 1,146  
 
                             
     For the nine months ended September 30, 2008:
                                 
    Upstream                    
    O&G     Downstream O&G     Engineering     Consolidated  
Revenue
  $ 982,836     $ 278,995     $ 188,171     $ 1,450,002  
Operating expenses
    925,044       260,223       165,180       1,350,447  
 
                       
Operating income
  $ 57,792     $ 18,772     $ 22,991       99,555  
 
                         
Other expense, net
                            (4,875 )
Provision for income taxes
                            36,450  
 
                             
Net income from continuing operations
                            58,230  
Income from discontinued operations net of provision for income taxes
                            3,042  
 
                             
Net income
                          $ 61,272  
 
                             

15


Table of Contents

WILLBROS GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(In thousands, except share and per share amounts)
(Unaudited)
8. Segment Information (continued)
     For the nine months ended September 30, 2007:
                                 
    Upstream     Downstream              
    O&G     O&G     Engineering     Consolidated  
Revenue
  $ 482,104     $     $ 128,064     $ 610,168  
Operating expenses
    475,743             118,565       594,308  
Government fines
                      22,000  
 
                       
Operating income (loss)
  $ 6,361     $     $ 9,499       (6,140 )
 
                         
Other expense, net
                            (19,513 )
Provision for income taxes
                            7,793  
 
                             
Net loss from continuing operations
                            (33,446 )
Loss from discontinued operations net of provision for income taxes
                            (21,494 )
 
                             
Net loss
                          $ (54,940 )
 
                             
     Total assets by segment as of September 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007 are presented below:
                 
    September     December 31,  
    30, 2008     2007  
Upstream O&G
  $ 423,661     $ 369,255  
Downstream O&G
    138,914       123,707  
Engineering
    51,352       50,286  
Corporate
    254,422       232,954  
Discontinued operations
    2,673       3,211  
 
           
Total segment assets
  $ 871,022     $ 779,413  
 
           
9. Stockholders’ Equity
     The information contained in this note pertains to continuing and discontinued operations.
Stockholder Rights Plan
     On April 1, 1999, the Company adopted a Stockholder Rights Plan and declared a distribution of one Preferred Share Purchase Right (“Right”) on each outstanding share of the Company’s common stock. The distribution was made on April 15, 1999 to stockholders of record on that date. The Rights expire on April 14, 2009.
     The Rights are exercisable only if a person or group acquires 15 percent or more of the Company’s common stock or announces a tender offer the consummation of which would result in ownership by a person or group of 15 percent or more of the common stock. Each Right entitles stockholders to buy one one-thousandth of a share of a series of junior participating preferred stock at an exercise price of $30.00 per share.
     If the Company is acquired in a merger or other business combination transaction after a person or group has acquired 15 percent or more of the Company’s outstanding common stock, each Right entitles its holder to purchase, at the Right’s then-current exercise price, a number of acquiring company’s common shares having a market value of twice such price. In addition, if a person or group acquires 15 percent or more of the Company’s outstanding common stock, each Right entitles its holder (other than such person or members of such group) to purchase, at the Right’s then-current exercise price, a number of the Company’s common shares having a market value of twice such price.
     Prior to the acquisition by a person or group of beneficial ownership of 15 percent or more of the Company’s common stock, the Rights are redeemable for one-half cent per Right at the option of the Company’s Board of Directors.
Stock Ownership Plans
     During May 1996, the Company established the Willbros Group, Inc. 1996 Stock Plan (the “1996 Plan”) with 1,125,000 shares of common stock authorized for issuance to provide for awards to key employees of the Company, and the Willbros Group, Inc. Director Stock Plan (the “Director Plan”) with 125,000 shares of common stock authorized for issuance to provide for the grant of stock options to non-employee directors. The number of shares authorized for issuance under the 1996 Plan and the Director Plan was increased to 4,825,000 and 225,000, respectively, by stockholder approval. The Director Plan expired August 16, 2006. In August 2006, the Company established the 2006 Director Restricted Stock Plan (the “2006 Director Plan”) with 50,000 shares authorized for issuance to grant shares of restricted stock and restricted stock rights to non-employee directors. The number of shares authorized for issuance under the 2006 Director Plan was increased to 250,000 by stockholder approval.

16


Table of Contents

WILLBROS GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(In thousands, except share and per share amounts)
(Unaudited)
9. Stockholders’ Equity (continued)
     Restricted stock and restricted stock rights, also described collectively as restricted stock units (“RSU’s”), and options granted under the 1996 Plan vest generally over a three to four year period. Options granted under the Director Plan are fully vested. Restricted stock and restricted stock rights granted under the 2006 Director Plan vest one year after the date of grant. At September 30, 2008, the 1996 Plan had 783,447 shares and the 2006 Director Plan had 217,875 shares available for grant. Of the shares available at September 30, 2008, 150,000 shares in the 1996 Stock Plan are reserved for future grants required under employment agreements. Certain provisions allow for accelerated vesting based on increases of share prices and on eligible retirement. Compensation expense of $0 and $35, respectively, for the nine months ended September 30, 2008 and 2007 and $0 and $19 for each of the three months ended September 30, 2008 and 2007 was recognized due to accelerated vesting of RSU’s due to retirements and separation from the Company.
     The Company follows the fair value recognition provisions of FASB Statements of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123R, “Share Based Payment” (“SFAS No. 123R”) using the modified prospective application method. Under this method, compensation cost recognized in the three and nine months ended September 30, 2008 and 2007 includes the applicable amounts of: (a) compensation expense of all share-based payments granted prior to, but not yet vested as of, January 1, 2006 (based on the grant-date fair value estimated in accordance with the original provisions of SFAS No. 123, “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation”), and (b) compensation cost for all share-based payments granted subsequent to January 1, 2006 (based on the grant-date fair value estimated in accordance with the provisions of SFAS No. 123R). The Company determines the fair value of stock options as of its grant date using the Black-Scholes valuation method.
     Share-based compensation related to RSU’s is recorded based on the Company’s stock price as of the grant date. Expense from both stock options and RSU’s totaled $2,596 and $1,088, respectively, for the three months ended September 30, 2008 and 2007 and $7,080 and $3,010, respectively, for the nine months ended September 30, 2008 and 2007.
     No options were granted during the three or nine months ended September 30, 2008 and 2007. Stock option activity for the nine months ended September 30, 2008 consists of:
                 
            Weighted  
    Number of     Average  
    Options     Exercise Price  
Outstanding at January 1, 2008
    418,750     $ 14.96  
Granted
           
Exercised
    53,000       12.90  
Forfeited or expired
    31,000       13.36  
 
           
Outstanding at September 30, 2008
    334,750     $ 15.44  
 
           
Exercisable at September 30, 2008
    228,916     $ 14.07  
 
           
     As of September 30, 2008, the aggregate intrinsic value of stock options outstanding and stock options exercisable was $3,715 and $2,849, respectively. The weighted average remaining contractual term of outstanding options is 5.97 years and the weighted average remaining contractual term of the exercisable options is 5.19 years at September 30, 2008. The total intrinsic value of options exercised during the nine months ended September 30, 2008 and 2007 was $1,284 and $1,491, respectively.
     The total fair value of options vested during the nine months ended September 30, 2008 and 2007 was $112 and $229, respectively, and $112 and $88 for each of the three months ended September 30, 2008 and 2007.
     The Company’s non-vested options at September 30, 2008 and the changes in non-vested options during the nine months ended September 30, 2008 are as follows:
                 
            Weighted  
            Average Grant-  
    Shares     Date Fair Value  
Nonvested, January 1, 2008
    130,834     $ 6.86  
Granted
           
Vested
    15,000       7.44  
Forfeited or expired
    10,000       5.65  
 
           
Nonvested, September 30, 2008
    105,834     $ 6.89  
 
           

17


Table of Contents

WILLBROS GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(In thousands, except share and per share amounts)
(Unaudited)
9. Stockholders’ Equity (continued)
     The Company’s RSU activity and related information for the nine months ended September 30, 2008 consist of:
                 
            Weighted  
    Number of     Average Grant-  
    RSU’s     Date Fair Value  
Outstanding at January 1, 2008
    548,688     $ 20.89  
Granted
    635,314       38.24  
Vested
    145,489       20.30  
Forfeited
    81,879       27.84  
 
           
Outstanding September 30, 2008
    956,634     $ 31.91  
 
           
     The total fair value of RSU’s vested during the nine months ended September 30, 2008 and 2007 was $2,953 and $1,855, respectively.
     As of September 30, 2008, there was a total of $24,717 of unrecognized compensation cost, net of estimated forfeitures, related to all non-vested share-based compensation arrangements granted under the Company’s stock ownership plans. That cost is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of 2.29 years.
Warrants to Purchase Common Stock
     On October 27, 2006, the Company completed a private placement of equity to certain accredited investors pursuant to which the Company issued and sold 3,722,360 shares of the Company’s common stock resulting in net proceeds of $48,748. In conjunction with the private placement, the Company also issued warrants to purchase an additional 558,354 shares of the Company’s common stock. Each warrant is exercisable, in whole or in part, until 60 months from the date of issuance. A warrant holder may elect to exercise the warrant by delivery of payment to the Company at the exercise price of $19.03 per share, or pursuant to a cashless exercise as provided in the warrant agreement. The fair value of the warrants was $3,423 on the date of the grant, as calculated using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model. There were 536,925 and 558,354 warrants outstanding at September 30, 2008 and 2007, respectively.
10. Income Taxes
     For interim financial reporting, the Company records the tax provision based on its estimate of the effective tax rate for the year. The Company has revised its annual estimated effective income tax rate from 42.0 percent to 38.5 percent during the three months ended September 30, 2008. The reduction in the effective income tax rate is primarily attributed to tax positions taken in connection with the deductibility of costs associated with certain contracts. The Company continues to refine its corporate structure and its overall tax strategy to increase tax efficiency.
11. Foreign Exchange Risk
     The Company attempts to negotiate contracts that provide for payment in U.S. dollars, but it may be required to take all or a portion of payment under a contract in another currency. To mitigate non-U.S. currency exchange risk, the Company seeks to match anticipated non-U.S. currency revenue with expenses in the same currency whenever possible. To the extent it is unable to match non-U.S. currency revenue with expenses in the same currency, the Company may use forward contracts, options or other common hedging techniques in the same non-U.S. currencies. The Company had no derivative financial instruments to hedge currency risk at September 30, 2008 or December 31, 2007.
12. Contingencies, Commitments and Other Circumstances
Commitments
     Resolution of criminal and regulatory matters
     In May 2008, the previously disclosed agreement in principle with the United States Department of Justice (the “DOJ”) and Willbros Group, Inc. (“WGI”), and its subsidiary, Willbros International, Inc. (“WII”), to settle the DOJ’s investigation into violations of the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act of 1977, as amended (the “FCPA”), reached final approval by the DOJ. The terms of the final agreement are included in a Deferred Prosecution Agreement (the “DPA”), more fully described below, which along with a six count criminal Information (the “Information”), was filed in the United States District Court, Southern District of Texas, Houston Division (the “Court”). When the requirements of the DPA are satisfied, the DOJ will dismiss the Information. Also in May 2008, a final agreement was reached by the Company with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) to resolve the SEC’s investigation into violations of the FCPA, the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”), and the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the

18


Table of Contents

WILLBROS GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(In thousands, except share and per share amounts)
(Unaudited)
12. Contingencies, Commitments and Other Circumstances (continued)
“Exchange Act”). The final settlement with the SEC has been entered and approved by the Court. These investigations stemmed primarily from the Company’s former operations in Bolivia, Ecuador and Nigeria.
     As described more fully below, the settlements together will require the Company to pay, over approximately three years, a total of $32,300 in penalties and disgorgement of profits, plus post-judgment interest on $7,725 of that amount. In addition, WGI and WII will, for a period of approximately three years, each be subject to the DPA with the DOJ. Finally, the Company will be subject to a permanent injunction barring future violations of certain provisions of the federal securities laws.
     More specifically, the terms of the final settlement agreement concluded by WGI and WII on May 14, 2008 with the DOJ include the following:
    The six counts include conspiracy to violate the FCPA, violations of the FCPA’s anti-bribery provisions and violations of the FCPA’s books-and-records provisions. WGI and WII face prosecution by the DOJ for the charges contained in the Information, and possibly other charges as well, if they fail to comply with the DPA.
 
    The DPA requires, for the three-year term of the DPA, continued full cooperation with the DOJ in its investigation; continued implementation of a compliance and ethics program to prevent and detect violations of the FCPA and other anti-corruption laws; and continued review of existing internal controls, policies and procedures in order to ensure that WGI and WII maintain adequate controls and a rigorous anti-corruption compliance code.
 
    The DPA also requires WGI and WII, at their expense, to engage an independent monitor for three years to assess and make recommendations about their compliance with the DPA. The independent monitor selection process is now underway with the DOJ having taken under consideration the candidate proposed by the Company.
 
    Provided that WGI and WII comply with the DPA, the DOJ has agreed not to prosecute WGI or WII based on the conduct described in the DPA and to move to dismiss the Information after three years.
 
    As part of the DPA, the Company will pay $22,000 in fines in four installments, consisting of the $10,000 payment made at signing on May 14, 2008, and $4,000 annually for three years thereafter, with no interest due on the unpaid amounts.
     With respect to the final settlement agreement concluded by the Company on May 14, 2008 with the SEC:
    The SEC filed in the Court a Complaint (the “SEC Complaint”) and a proposed Agreed Final Judgment against the Company (the “Judgment”). Without admitting or denying the allegations in the SEC Complaint, the Company consented to the filing of the SEC Complaint and entry of the Judgment to resolve the SEC’s investigation. The SEC Complaint alleges civil violations of the FCPA’s anti-bribery provisions, the FCPA’s books-and-records and internal control provisions and various antifraud provisions of the Securities Act and the Exchange Act. Since approved by the Court, the Judgment now permanently enjoins the Company from violating the FCPA’s anti-bribery, books-and-records, and internal control provisions and certain antifraud provisions of the Securities Act and the Exchange Act.
 
    The Judgment requires the Company to pay $8,900 for disgorgement of profits and $1,400 of pre-judgment interest. The disgorgement and pre-judgment interest are payable in four equal installments of $2,575, first on signing, and annually for three years thereafter. The first payment was made at signing on May 14, 2008. Post-judgment interest will be payable on the outstanding balance of $7,725. In January 2008, the Company deposited the first installment payment of $2,575 into an escrow account, as required by the SEC.
     Failure by the Company to comply with the terms and conditions of either the DOJ or the SEC settlement could result in resumed prosecution and other regulatory sanctions.
     In addition, the Company previously disclosed that the Office of Foreign Assets Control (“OFAC”) was investigating allegations of violations of the Sudanese Sanctions Regulations occurring during October 2003. The Company voluntarily reported this matter to OFAC and also has reported to OFAC corrective measures and improvements to the Company’s OFAC compliance program. OFAC and Willbros USA, Inc. have agreed in principle to settle the allegations pursuant to which the Company will pay a total civil penalty not to exceed $30.
     Other
     In addition to the matters discussed above, the Company is party to a number of other legal proceedings. Management believes that the nature and number of these proceedings are typical for a firm of similar size engaged in a similar type of business and that none of these proceedings is material to the Company’s financial position. See Note 13 — Discontinuance of Operations, Asset Disposals and Transition Services Agreement for discussion of commitments and contingencies associated with Discontinued Operations.

19


Table of Contents

WILLBROS GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(In thousands, except share and per share amounts)
(Unaudited)
12. Contingencies, Commitments and Other Circumstances (continued)
     From time to time, the Company enters into commercial commitments, usually in the form of commercial and standby letters of credit, surety bonds and financial guarantees. Contracts with the Company’s customers may require the Company to secure letters of credit or surety bonds with regard to the Company’s performance of contracted services. In such cases, the commitments can be called upon in the event of failure to perform contracted services. Likewise, contracts may allow the Company to issue letters of credit or surety bonds in lieu of contract retention provisions, where the client withholds a percentage of the contract value until project completion or expiration of a warranty period. Retention commitments can be called upon in the event of warranty or project completion issues, as prescribed in the contracts. At September 30, 2008, the Company had approximately $33,974 of letters of credit related to continuing operations and $123 of letters of credit related to Discontinued Operations in Nigeria. These amounts represent the maximum amount of payments the Company could be required to make if these letters of credit are drawn upon. Additionally, the Company issues surety bonds customarily required by commercial terms on construction projects. At September 30, 2008, the Company had bonds outstanding, primarily performance bonds, valued at $463,228 related to continuing operations. These amounts represent the bond penalty amount of future payments the Company could be required to make if the Company fails to perform its obligations under such contracts. The performance bonds do not have a stated expiration date; rather, each is released when the contract is accepted by the owner. The Company’s maximum exposure as it relates to the value of the bonds outstanding is lowered on each bonded project as the cost to complete is reduced. As of September 30, 2008, no liability has been recognized for letters of credit or surety bonds, other than $13 recorded as the fair value of the letters of credit outstanding for the Nigeria operations. See Note 13 – Discontinuance of Operations, Asset Disposals, and Transition Services Agreement for further discussion of these letters of credit.
Other Circumstances
     Operations outside the United States may be subject to certain risks, which ordinarily would not be expected to exist in the United States, including foreign currency restrictions, extreme exchange rate fluctuations, expropriation of assets, civil uprisings and riots, war, unanticipated taxes including income taxes, excise duties, import taxes, export taxes, sales taxes or other governmental assessments, availability of suitable personnel and equipment, termination of existing contracts and leases, government instability and legal systems of decrees, laws, regulations, interpretations and court decisions which are not always fully developed and which may be retroactively applied. Management is not presently aware of any events of the type described in the countries in which it operates that would have a material effect on the financial statements, and have not been provided for in the accompanying Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
     Based upon the advice of local advisors in the various work countries concerning the interpretation of the laws, practices and customs of the countries in which it operates, management believes the Company follows the current practices in those countries and as applicable under the FCPA. However, because of the nature of these potential risks, there can be no assurance that the Company may not be adversely affected by them in the future.
     The Company insures substantially all of its equipment in countries outside the United States against certain political risks and terrorism through political risk insurance coverage that contains a 20 percent co-insurance provision. The Company has the usual liability of contractors for the completion of contracts and the warranty of its work. Where work is performed through a joint venture, the Company also has possible liability for the contract completion and warranty responsibilities of its joint venture partners. In addition, the Company acts as prime contractor on a majority of the projects it undertakes and is normally responsible for the performance of the entire project, including subcontract work. Management is not aware of any material exposure related thereto which has not been provided for in the accompanying Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
     Certain post-contract completion audits and reviews are periodically conducted by clients and/or government entities. While there can be no assurance that claims will not be received as a result of such audits and reviews, management does not believe a legitimate basis exists for any material claims. At present, it is not possible for management to estimate the likelihood of such claims being asserted or, if asserted, the amount or nature or ultimate disposition thereof.
13. Discontinuance of Operations, Asset Disposals, and Transition Services Agreement
Strategic Decisions
     In 2006, the Company announced that it intended to sell its assets and operations in Nigeria and classified these operations as Discontinued Operations. The net assets and net liabilities related to the Discontinued Operations are shown on the Consolidated Balance Sheets as “Assets of discontinued operations” and “Liabilities of discontinued operations”, respectively. The results of the Discontinued Operations are shown on the Consolidated Statements of Operations as “Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of provision for income taxes” for all periods presented.

20


Table of Contents

WILLBROS GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(In thousands, except share and per share amounts)
(Unaudited)
13. Discontinuance of Operations, Asset Disposals, and Transition Services Agreement (continued)
Nigeria Assets and Nigeria-Based Operations
     Share Purchase Agreement
     On February 7, 2007, the Company sold its Nigeria assets and Nigeria-based operations in West Africa to Ascot Offshore Nigeria Limited (“Ascot”), a Nigerian oilfield services company, for total consideration of $155,250 (the “Purchase Price”). The sale was pursuant to a Share Purchase Agreement by and between the Company and Ascot dated as of February 7, 2007 (the “Agreement”), providing for the purchase by Ascot of all of the share capital of WG Nigeria Holdings Limited (“WGNHL”), the holding company for Willbros West Africa, Inc. (“WWAI”), Willbros (Nigeria) Limited, Willbros (Offshore) Nigeria Limited and WG Nigeria Equipment Limited.
     In connection with the sale of its Nigeria assets and operations, the Company and its subsidiary WII entered into an indemnity agreement with Ascot and Berkeley Group plc (“Berkeley”), the parent company of Ascot (the “Indemnity Agreement”), pursuant to which Ascot and Berkeley will indemnify the Company and WII for any obligations incurred by the Company or WII in connection with the parent company guarantees (the “Guarantees”) that the Company and WII previously issued and maintained on behalf of certain former subsidiaries now owned by Ascot under certain working contracts between the subsidiaries and their customers. Either the Company, WII or both may be contractually obligated, in varying degrees, under the Guarantees to perform or cause to be performed work related to several ongoing projects. Among the Guarantees covered by the Indemnity Agreement are five contracts under which the Company estimates that, at February 7, 2007, there was aggregate remaining contract revenue, excluding any additional claim revenue, of $352,107 and aggregate estimated cost to complete of $293,562. At the February 7, 2007 sale date, one of the contracts covered by the Guarantees was estimated to be in a loss position with an accrual for such loss of $33,157. The associated liability was included in the liabilities acquired by Ascot and Berkeley.
     In early 2008, the Company received its first notification asserting various rights under one of the outstanding parent guarantees. On February 1, 2008, WWAI, the Ascot company performing the West African Gas Pipeline (“WAGP”) contract, received a letter from West African Gas Pipeline Company Limited (“WAPCo”), the owner of WAGP, wherein WAPCo gave written notice alleging that WWAI was in default under the WAGP contract, as amended, and giving WWAI a brief cure period to remedy the alleged default. We understand that WWAI responded by denying being in breach of its WAGP contract obligations, and apparently also advised WAPCo that WWAI “...requires a further $55 million, without which it will not be able to complete the work which it had previously undertaken to perform.” The Company understands that, on February 27, 2008, WAPCo terminated the WAGP contract for the alleged continuing non-performance of WWAI.
     Also, on February 1, 2008, the Company received a letter from WAPCo reminding the Company of its parent guarantee on the WAGP contract and requesting that we remedy WWAI’s default under that contract, as amended. On previous occasions, the Company has advised WAPCo that, for a variety of legal, contractual, and other reasons, it did not consider the prior WAGP contract parent guarantee to have continued application, and the Company reiterated that position to WAPCo in the Company’s response to its February 1, 2008 letter. WAPCo disputes the Company’s position that it is no longer bound by the terms of the Company’s prior parent guarantee of the WAGP contract and has reserved all its rights in that regard. Currently, the WAGP project is at a stand still for a variety of technical and commercial issues unrelated to WAPCo’s termination of the WAGP contract.
     The Company anticipates that this potential dispute with WAPCo may result in a lengthy arbitration proceeding between WAPCo and WWAI in the London Court of International Arbitration to determine the validity of the alleged default notice issued by WAPCo to WWAI, including any resulting damage award, in combination with a lawsuit between WAPCo and the Company in the English Courts under English law to determine the enforceability, in whole or in part, of the Company’s parent guarantee, which the Company expects to be a lengthy process.
     The Company currently has no employees working in Nigeria and we have no intention of returning to Nigeria. If ultimately it is determined by an English Court that the Company is liable, in whole or in part, for damages that WAPCo may establish against WWAI for WWAI’s alleged non-performance of the WAGP contract, or if WAPCo is able to establish liability against the Company directly under parent company guarantee, and, in either case, are unable to enforce rights under the indemnity agreement entered into with Ascot in connection with the WAGP contract, the Company may experience substantial losses. However, at this time, the Company cannot predict the outcome of any arbitration or litigation which may ensue in this developing WAGP contract dispute, or be certain of the degree to which the indemnity agreement given in our favor by Ascot will protect the Company. Based upon current knowledge of the relevant facts and circumstances, the Company does not expect that the outcome of the potential dispute will have a material adverse effect on our financial condition or results of operations.

21


Table of Contents

WILLBROS GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(In thousands, except share and per share amounts)
(Unaudited)
13. Discontinuance of Operations, Asset Disposals, and Transition Services Agreement (continued)
     Letters of Credit
     At the time of the February 7, 2007 sale of its Nigeria assets and operations, the Company had four letters of credit outstanding totaling $20,322 associated with Discontinued Operations (the “Discontinued LC’s”). In accordance with FASB Interpretation No. 45, “Guarantors Accounting and Disclosure Requirements for Guarantees, Including Guarantees of Indebtedness of Others” (“FIN 45”), a liability was recognized for $1,575 related to the letters of credit. This liability is released as each of the Discontinued LC’s is released or expires and the Company is relieved of its risk related to the Discontinued LC’s. As of September 30, 2008 only one of the Discontinued LCs remains issued and outstanding. This Discontinued LC in the amount of $123 is scheduled to expire on February 28, 2009. During the three months ended September 30, 2008, two Discontinued LC’s in the aggregate amount of $19,759 expired resulting in the release of the associated liability and recognition of $1,543 of additional cumulative gain on the sale of Nigeria assets and operations. The fair value of the remaining Discontinued LC is $13 and will also result in positive impact to the cumulative gain on sale when and if it is released.
     Transition Services Agreement
     Concurrent with the Nigeria sale, the Company entered into a two-year Transition Services Agreement (“TSA”) with Ascot. Under the agreement, the Company was primarily providing labor in the form of seconded employees to work under the direction of Ascot along with specifically defined work orders for services generally covered in the TSA. Ascot agreed to reimburse the Company for these services. For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2008, these reimbursable contract costs totaled approximately $664 and $3,227, respectively. Both the Company and Ascot have been working to shift the transition services provided by the Company to services directly secured by Ascot. That effort is substantially complete in that the Company has no employees still seconded to Ascot working in West Africa generally, or Nigeria specifically; however, the Company continues to provide minimal transition services from the U.S.
     Residual Equipment in Nigeria
     In conjunction with the TSA, the Company has made available certain equipment to Ascot for use in Nigeria and at times, in Benin, Togo, and Ghana. This equipment was not sold to Ascot under the Agreement. The Company has not resolved with Ascot the rental rates for this equipment. Therefore, we have not recorded a receivable related to the use of the equipment, but have incurred and recorded all necessary depreciation and holding costs. Due to business and legal conditions in Nigeria, the Company recorded an impairment charge of $1,542 related to this equipment located in Nigeria in the fourth quarter of 2007. The Company’s net book value for the equipment in West Africa at September 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007 was $641 and $1,205, respectively. This equipment is comprised primarily of construction equipment, rolling stock, and generator sets. The Company is in the process of redeploying this equipment for use in Oman.
     Insurance Recovery
     During the nine months ended September 30, 2008, income from Discontinued Operations consisted of two pre-Nigeria sale insurance claim recoveries of $850 and $2,154 for events of loss the Company suffered prior to the sale of its Nigeria operations.

22


Table of Contents

WILLBROS GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(In thousands, except share and per share amounts)
(Unaudited)
13. Discontinuance of Operations, Asset Disposals, and Transition Services Agreement (continued)
Results of Discontinued Operations
     Condensed Statements of Operations of the Discontinued Operations for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2008 and 2007 are as follows:
                         
    Three Months Ended September 30, 2008  
                    Discontinued  
    Nigeria     Nigeria TSA     Operations  
Contract revenue
  $     $ 418     $ 418  
 
                       
Operating expenses:
                       
Contract
          665       665  
General and administrative
    13       (1 )     12  
 
                 
Operating loss
    (13 )     (246 )     (259 )
Other income (expense)
    1,486       (3 )     1,483  
 
                 
Income (loss) before income taxes
    1,473       (249 )     1,224  
Provision for income taxes
          5       5  
 
                 
Net income (loss)
  $ 1,473     $ (254 )   $ 1,219  
 
                 
                         
    Three Months Ended September 30, 2007  
                    Discontinued  
    Nigeria     Nigeria TSA     Operations  
Contract revenue
  $     $ 4,825     $ 4,825  
 
                       
Operating expenses:
                       
Contract
            4,868       4,868  
General and administrative
          124       124  
Profit disgorgement
    10,300             10,300  
 
                 
Operating loss
    (10,300 )     (167 )     (10,467 )
Other income
    1,441       54       1,495  
 
                 
Loss before income taxes
    (8,859 )     (113 )     (8,972 )
Provision for income taxes
          154       154  
 
                 
Net loss
  $ (8,859 )   $ (267 )   $ (9,126 )
 
                 
                         
    Nine Months Ended September 30, 2008  
                    Discontinued  
    Nigeria     Nigeria TSA     Operations  
Contract revenue
  $     $ 2,087     $ 2,087  
 
                       
Operating expenses:
                       
Contract
          3,195       3,195  
General and administrative
    13       32       45  
 
                 
Operating loss
    (13 )     (1,140 )     (1,153 )
Other income (expense)
    4,393       (178 )     4,215  
 
                 
Income (loss) before income taxes
    4,380       (1,318 )     3,062  
Provision for income taxes
          20       20  
 
                 
Net income (loss)
  $ 4,380     $ (1,338 )   $ 3,042  
 
                 

23


Table of Contents

WILLBROS GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(In thousands, except share and per share amounts)
(Unaudited)
13. Discontinuance of Operations, Asset Disposals, and Transition Services Agreement (continued)
                         
    Nine Months Ended September 30, 2007  
                    Discontinued  
    Nigeria(1)     Nigeria TSA     Operations  
Contract revenue
  $ 30,046     $ 21,906     $ 51,952  
 
                       
Operating expenses:
                       
Contract
    34,360       21,016       55,376  
General and administrative
    3,472       566       4,038  
Profit disgorgement
    10,300             10,300  
 
                 
Operating income (loss)
    (18,086 )     324       (17,762 )
Other income (expense)
    (1,946 )     55       (1,891 )
 
                 
Income (loss) before income taxes
    (20,032 )     379       (19,653 )
Provision for income taxes
    1,092       749       1,841  
 
                 
Net loss
  $ (21,124 )   $ (370 )   $ (21,494 )
 
                 
 
(1)   Reflects operations through February 7, 2007.
Financial Position of Discontinued Operations
     Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets of the Discontinued Operations are as follows:
                 
    September 30,     December 31,  
    2008     2007  
Current assets:
               
Cash and cash equivalents
  $ 309     $ 211  
Accounts receivable, net
    960       296  
Prepaid expenses
    130       879  
 
           
Total current assets
    1,399       1,386  
Property, plant and equipment, net
    641       1,205  
Other assets
    633       620  
 
           
Total assets
    2,673       3,211  
Current liabilities:
    637       978  
 
           
Total current liabilities
    637       978  
 
           
Net assets of discontinued operations
  $ 2,036     $ 2,233  
 
           

24


Table of Contents

ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (In thousands, except share and per share amounts or unless otherwise noted)
OVERVIEW
     The following discussion should be read in conjunction with the unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2008 and 2007, included in Item 1 of this Form 10-Q, and the Consolidated Financial Statements and Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, including Critical Accounting Policies, included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007.
Business
     We are a provider of energy services to global end markets serving the oil and gas, refinery, petrochemical and power industries. Our services, which include engineering, procurement and construction (which when performed together we refer to as “EPC”) turnaround, maintenance and other specialty services, are critical to the ongoing expansion and operation of energy infrastructure. Within the global energy market, we specialize in designing, constructing, upgrading and repairing midstream infrastructure such as pipelines, compressor stations and related facilities for onshore and coastal locations as well as downstream facilities, such as refineries. We also provide specialty turnaround services, tank services, heater services, construction services and safety services and fabricate specialty items for hydrocarbon processing units. We provide, from time to time, asset development and participate in the ownership and operations as an extension of our portfolio of industry services. We place particular emphasis on achieving the best risk-adjusted returns. Depending upon market conditions, we may work in developing countries and we believe our experience gives us a competitive advantage in frontier areas where experience in dealing with project logistics is an important consideration for project award and execution. We also believe our engineering, planning and project management expertise, as it relates to optimizing the structure and execution of a project, provides us with competitive advantages in the markets we serve.
     We are a top tier, global pipeline contractor to the hydrocarbon pipeline market, having performed work in 59 countries and constructed over 200,000 kilometers of pipelines in our history. We complement our pipeline market expertise with our service offerings to the downstream hydrocarbon processing market providing integrated solutions for turnaround, maintenance and capital projects for the refining and petrochemical industries. We have performed these downstream services for 60 of 149 refineries in the United States. We offer our clients full asset lifecycle services and in some cases we provide the entire scope of services for a project, from front-end engineering and design to procurement, construction, commissioning and ongoing facility operations and maintenance. With over 100 years of expertise in the global energy infrastructure market, our full asset lifecycle services are utilized by major pipeline transportation companies, exploration, production and refining companies and government entities worldwide.
Segments
     Our business is organized into three segments: Upstream oil and gas (“O&G”), Downstream O&G and Engineering. We can support our clients’ needs related to EPC projects or ongoing operations and maintenance services through any of our segments.
     Upstream O&G
     We provide our expertise, including systems, personnel and equipment, to construct and replace large-diameter cross-country pipelines; fabricate engineered structures, process modules and facilities; and construct oil and gas production facilities, pump stations, flow stations, gas compressor stations, gas processing facilities, gathering lines and related facilities. We also provide certain specialty services to increase our equipment and personnel utilization. We currently provide these services in the United States, Canada, and Oman, and with our international experience can enter (or re-enter) individual country markets if and as conditions there are attractive to us and present an attractive risk-adjusted return.
     Downstream O&G
     We provide integrated, full-service specialty construction, turnaround, repair and maintenance services to the downstream energy infrastructure market, which consists primarily of refineries and petrochemical facilities. We are one of four major contractors in the United States that provides services for the overhaul of high-utilization fluid catalytic cracking units, the primary gasoline-producing unit in refineries. These catalytic cracking units, which operate continuously for long periods of time, are typically overhauled on a three to five-year cycle. We also provide similar turnaround services for other refinery process units, as well as specialty services. We design, manufacture and install process heaters for the refining industry. We also provide maintenance and construction services for the American Petroleum Institute storage tank market. We provide these services primarily in the United States, but our experience includes international projects and we are exploring opportunities to expand this offering to other locations with attractive risk-adjusted returns.

25


Table of Contents

     Engineering
     We specialize in providing a broad array of engineering, project management, pipeline integrity and field services. Our engineering services cover from front-end engineering design and feasibility analysis to detailed design to assist our clients in conceptualizing, evaluating, designing, routing, permitting and managing the construction or expansion of pipelines, compressor stations, pump stations, fuel storage facilities, field gathering facilities and production facilities. In addition, we provide a full range of pipeline management and maintenance services, program engineering services including managing and performing our clients annual engineering programs, project management and field services including acquiring and administering right-of-way acquisition for projects, environmental services, site surveying and mapping.
Changing Business Environment
     Tightening credit markets have resulted in a worldwide credit crisis that has triggered substantial uncertainty with respect to the funding of capital expenditures by our customers. Prices for oil and natural gas have fallen approximately 50 percent from their highs in mid-summer 2008. These changes have impacted general business conditions and reduced visibility for certain aspects of our business. However, our backlog is over $1 billion as of September 30, 2008 and provides visibility into the third quarter of 2009 for our mainline U.S. pipeline construction unit. While we have evidence that certain prospects may be delayed, we believe none of our contracts in backlog are at risk.
     We continue to shift our business from being primarily a construction company to a company that provides more diversified services. Our model benefits from recurring maintenance expenditures and life cycle improvements necessary to maintain and operate complex hydrocarbon transportation and refining facilities.
     Although we are not immune to the current financial and economic events, we are well positioned with our service offerings and geographic locations to take advantage of our markets as further detailed below:
    Our U. S. mainline pipeline and facilities construction businesses are well positioned to take advantage of the development of new sources of natural gas supply which require new infrastructure to monetize these investments. These new sources of supply include the new shale plays such as Haynesville, Fayetteville, Marcellus and others.
 
    We are positioned to build the take away pipelines from the significant development and investments made in the Canadian oil sands.
 
    In the Canadian oil sands, our maintenance and fabrication businesses are service offerings that are required to operate the facilities even in the current financial environment.
 
    Our diversified Downstream O&G service offering is focused on asset life extension and maintenance projects for the process industries, which can be robust even in the current business environment.
 
    Our EPC offering is unique to our space and allows us to earn more revenue per engineer and to qualify for larger projects, leveraging our revenue and increasing earnings opportunities.
 
    Our past experience and brand name provides us access to international markets.
 
    And finally, we have strengthened our financial position. Our strong balance sheet and operating cash flow should allow us to effectively operate our business and to take advantage of the potential opportunities that may occur during a period of change like we are currently experiencing.
     During the nine months ended September 30, 2008, our continuing operations provided $96,494 of cash. Our September 30, 2008 cash and cash equivalents balance was $127,552 and we have increased our working capital $61,904 to $261,019 from $199,115 at December 31, 2007. Our operations are not dependent on external short-term funding and we have not utilized the cash borrowing base available under our revolving credit facility during 2008. We believe that our strong balance sheet will provide us opportunities to pursue our strategy as discussed in the following section.
Strategy
     We work diligently to increase stockholder value by leveraging our competitive strengths to focus on profitability and risk mitigation in the changing global energy infrastructure market and to position ourselves for sustained long-term earnings growth.
     Focus on Managing Risk.  
     We have implemented a core set of business practices and policies which have fundamentally improved our risk profile. We have implemented our risk management policy by exiting higher risk countries, focusing our activity on higher margin opportunities in lower risk countries, diversifying our service offerings and end markets, practicing rigorous financial management and managing contract execution risk. Risk management is emphasized throughout all levels of the organization and covers all aspects of a project from strategic planning and bidding to contract management and financial reporting.
    Safety first culture. Our core values emphasize safety as the foremost value in our culture and safety is the driver for all other values. Our focus is on 100 percent involvement by all employees in providing a safe accident-free workplace. This core value demands that 100 percent of our employees, from executive management to field labor, be trained in our safety first culture and safety-first performance at every level in the organization. Every action must meet our safety criteria.

26


Table of Contents

    Focus resources in markets with the highest risk-adjusted return. We believe North America currently offers us the highest risk-adjusted returns and the majority of our resources are focused on this region. For the third quarter of 2008, we earned 94.8 percent of our revenue in North America. However, we continue to seek international opportunities which can provide superior risk-adjusted returns and believe our extensive international experience is a competitive advantage. We believe that markets in North Africa and the Middle East, where we also have substantial experience, may offer attractive opportunities for us in the future given mid and long-term industry trends.
 
    Maintain a conservative contract portfolio. Our current contract portfolio is composed of 88.4 percent cost-reimbursable work which provides for a more equitable allocation of risk between us and our customers. We intend to maintain a balanced risk-to-reward portfolio.
 
    Ethical business practices. We demand that all of our employees and representatives conduct our business in accordance with the highest ethical standards—in compliance with applicable laws, rules and regulations, with honesty and integrity, and in a manner which demonstrates respect for others.
     Leverage Industry Position and Reputation into a Broader Service Offering.
     We believe the global energy infrastructure market will continue to provide opportunities; however, the current business environment will require increased focus on projects with a high probability of moving forward in the near term. We believe our core capabilities can be expanded beyond the global energy infrastructure market and we are selectively evaluating these prospects. Our established platform and track record positions us to capitalize on these opportunities by leveraging our expertise into a broader range of related service offerings. We intend to leverage our project management, engineering and construction skills to establish additional service offerings, such as instrumentation and electrical services, turbo-machinery services, environmental services and pipeline system integrity services.
     Additionally, we intend to pursue selective strategic acquisitions to complement our organic expansion strategies and to minimize our cyclical dependence on the large-diameter cross-country pipeline construction market. For example, in 2007, we completed two acquisitions that expanded our service offerings as well as the regions where we effectively deliver those services. Our November 2007 acquisition of Integrated Service Company LLC (“InServ”), complemented our service offerings in the midstream market while our July 2007 acquisition of Midwest significantly enhanced our presence in Western Canada, including the growing oil sands regions.
     Maintain Financial Flexibility.
     As we continue to grow and diversify our service offerings we must possess the financial flexibility to meet material, equipment and personnel needs to support our project commitments. We view financial strength and flexibility as a fundamental requirement to fulfilling our strategy. As of September 30, 2008, we had cash and cash equivalents of $127,552 and $50,000 of unutilized cash borrowing capacity under our revolving credit facility to address our current capital requirements with no short-term borrowings or commercial paper outstanding. For the nine months ended September 30, 2008, we increased our working capital position, for continuing operations, by $61,904 (31.1 percent) to $261,019 from $199,115 at December 31, 2007. We continue to focus on surety bonds in lieu of letters of credit as performance security for the completion of our projects thereby replacing the relatively high-cost letters of credit with lower cost surety bonding. In addition, our $150,000 senior secured revolving credit facility (the “2007 Credit Facility”) provides us additional financial flexibility to pursue our growth strategy. The combination of our strong cash position, the availability of our 2007 Credit Facility, and our working capital position will allow us to focus on the highest return projects available during uncertain economic times as well as pursue our strategy of diversification as opportunities present themselves. The limited availability of credit in the market has not affected our credit facility; nor do we believe that it will impact our ability to access surety bonding in the future.
     Leverage Core Service Expertise into Additional Full EPC Contracts.
     Our core expertise and service offerings allow us to provide our customers with a single source EPC solution which creates greater efficiencies to the benefit of both our customers and our company. In performing integrated EPC contracts, we establish ourselves as overall project managers from the earliest stages of project inception and are therefore better able to efficiently determine the design, permitting, procurement and construction sequence for a project in connection with making engineering decisions. Our customers benefit from a more seamless execution; while for us, these contracts often yield higher profit margins on the engineering and construction components of the contract compared to stand-alone contracts for similar services. Additionally, this contract structure allows us to deploy our resources more efficiently and capture the engineering, procurement and construction components of these projects.
Financial Summary
     Third Quarter Results and Financial Position
     For the three months ended September 30, 2008, we achieved net income from continuing operations of $19,051 or $0.50 per basic share and $0.46 per diluted share on revenue of $490,651. This compares to net income from continuing operations of $10,272 or $0.36 per basic and $0.32 per diluted share on revenue of $246,716 for the three months ended September 30, 2007.

27


Table of Contents

     Revenue for the three months ended September 30, 2008 increased $243,935 (98.9 percent) to $490,651 from $246,716 during the same period in 2007. Following are the key components of the increase in revenue:
    Revenue earned on pipeline construction and EPC projects in the United States; and
 
    Revenue of $86,249 in 2008 from the Downstream O&G segment derived from our acquisition of InServ in November 2007.
     Operating income for the three months ended September 30, 2008 increased $10,013 (53.5 percent) to $28,735 from $18,722 during the same period in 2007. The favorable operating income results were driven primarily by increased revenue. Operating margin decreased 1.7 percent to 5.9 percent in 2008 from 7.6 percent in 2007. The operating margin decrease was driven by lower contract margin, the inclusion of intangible amortization resulting from the InServ acquisition, and partially offset by lower general and administrative (“G&A”) expense as a percent of revenue.
     Other non-operating, net expense for the three months ended September 30, 2008 decreased $742 (31.3 percent) to $1,627 from $2,369 during the same period in 2007. The decrease in net expense is primarily a result of a $1,071 charge recorded in third quarter of 2007 related to a non-recurring legal settlement offset by an increase in interest expense of $413.
     The provision for income taxes for the three months ended September 30, 2008 increased $1,976 to $8,057 on income from continuing operations before income taxes of $27,108 (an effective tax rate of 29.7 percent) as compared to a provision for income taxes of $6,081 on income from continuing operations before income taxes of $16,353 (an effective tax rate of 37.2 percent) during the same period in 2007. The increase in the provision for income taxes is due to improved operating results in the U.S., thereby generating more taxable income in third quarter of 2008 as compared to the third quarter of 2007. The increase was partially mitigated by a downward revision and related third quarter catch-up adjustment of the estimated 2008 effective tax rate for the year from 42.0 percent to 38.5 percent. The reduction in the 2008 estimated effective tax rate is primarily attributed to tax positions taken in connection with costs associated with certain contracts and the deductibility of these costs. We continue to refine our corporate structure and its overall tax strategy to increase tax efficiency.
     Working capital as of September 30, 2008, for continuing operations, increased $61,904 (31.1 percent) to $261,019 from $199,115 at December 31, 2007. The increase in working capital was primarily driven by positive cash flow of $31,135 generated from continuing operations during the nine months ended September 30, 2008. Working capital increased $13,607 due to the reclassification of property, plant and equipment to assets held for sale. This is related to a facility in Canada that was formerly classified as property, plant and equipment and is currently being held for sale with an expected closing date by year-end. Additionally, working capital accounts that generally trend with the increase of project activity increased $5,367, net. These accounts include accounts receivable, contract costs and income not yet billed, inventory, accounts payable and accrued liabilities and contract billings in excess of cost and recognized income. We also had an increase of $7,128 in prepaid expenses primarily due to the timing of our umbrella and general liability insurance policy renewal.
     Our debt to equity ratio as of September 30, 2008, decreased to 0.31:1 from 0.38:1 at December 31, 2007. Our aggregate outstanding debt has decreased $7,101 to $145,245 at September 30, 2008 from $152,346 at December 31, 2007, while we have significantly increased our stockholders’ equity $70,304 to $466,405 at September 30, 2008 from $396,101 at December 31, 2007.
Other Financial Measures
     Backlog
     In our industry, backlog is considered an indicator of potential future performance because it represents a portion of the future revenue stream. Our strategy is focused on backlog additions and capturing quality backlog with margins commensurate with the risks associated with a given project.
     Backlog consists of anticipated revenue from the uncompleted portions of existing contracts and contracts whose award is reasonably assured. At September 30, 2008, total backlog from continuing operations decreased $266,997 (20.5 percent) to $1,038,444 from $1,305,441 at December 31, 2007. There was no backlog for discontinued operations at September 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007, respectively. We consider the composition of our backlog between fixed-price and cost reimbursable contracts just as important as the overall growth of backlog. Cost reimbursable contracts comprised 88.4 percent of backlog at September 30, 2008 versus 74.9 percent of backlog at December 31, 2007. We expect that approximately $441,688 or approximately 43.0 percent, of our existing total backlog at September 30, 2008 will be recognized in revenue during the remainder of 2008.
     We believe the backlog figures are firm, subject only to the cancellation and modification provisions contained in various contracts. Historically, a substantial amount of our revenue in a given year has not been in our backlog at the beginning of that year. Additionally, due to the short duration of many jobs, revenue associated with jobs performed within a reporting period will not be reflected in quarterly backlog reports. We generate revenue from numerous sources, including contracts of long or short duration entered into during a year as well as from various contractual processes, including change orders, extra work, variations in the scope of work and the effect of escalation or currency fluctuation formulas. These revenue sources are not added to backlog until realization is assured.

28


Table of Contents

     The following tables show our backlog by operating segment and geographic location as of September 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007:
                                 
    September 30, 2008     December 31, 2007  
    Amount     Percent     Amount     Percent  
Operating Segment
                               
Upstream O&G
  $ 795,103       76.5 %   $ 941,301       72.1 %
Downstream O&G
    178,249       17.2 %     199,646       15.3 %
Engineering
    65,092       6.3 %     164,494       12.6 %
 
                       
Total, continuing operations
    1,038,444       100.0 %     1,305,441       100.0 %
 
                           
Discontinued operations
                           
 
                           
Total backlog
  $ 1,038,444             $ 1,305,441          
 
                           
                                 
    September 30, 2008     December 31, 2007  
    Amount     Percent     Amount     Percent  
Geographic Region
                               
United States
  $ 778,153       74.9 %   $ 1,014,351       77.7 %
Canada
    206,411       19.9 %     215,527       16.5 %
Oman
    53,880       5.2 %     75,563       5.8 %
 
                       
Total backlog
  $ 1,038,444       100.0 %   $ 1,305,441       100.0 %
 
                       
     EBITDA from Continuing Operations
     Earnings before net interest, income taxes, depreciation and amortization (“EBITDA”) is a non-GAAP measure that we use as a part of our overall assessment of financial performance between accounting periods. We believe that EBITDA is used by the financial community as a method of measuring our performance and of evaluating the market value of companies considered to be in businesses similar to ours.
A reconciliation of EBITDA from continuing operations to GAAP financial information follows:
                                 
    Three Months Ended     Nine Months Ended  
    September 30,     September 30,  
    2008     2007     2008     2007  
Net income (loss) from continuing operations
  $ 19,051     $ 10,272     $ 58,230     $ (33,446 )
Interest, net
    1,685       1,042       5,079       2,119  
Provision for income taxes
    8,057       6,081       36,450       7,793  
Depreciation and amortization
    11,201       5,457       33,988       13,223  
 
                       
EBITDA
  $ 39,994     $ 22,852     $ 133,747     $ (10,311 )
 
                       
     EBITDA from continuing operations for the three months ended September 30, 2008 increased $17,142 (75.0 percent) to $39,994 from $22,852 during the same period in 2007. The increase in EBITDA during the three months ended September 30, 2008, is primarily a result of increased net income and depreciation and amortization. The primary cause of the increased net income is increased contract income of $28,859 (excluding depreciation) resulting from the growth of our project activity level and the execution of those projects. The increase in contract income (excluding depreciation) is partially offset by a decrease in contract margin of 2.0 percentage points to 13.8 percent during the three months ended September 30, 2008, from 15.8 percent during the same period in 2007. The increase in depreciation and amortization is primarily a result of our increased capital additions and capital expenditures incurred to support the growth of our business and project activity levels. Additionally, the three months ended 2008 include $2,586 of amortization of intangible assets related to our acquisition of InServ in the fourth quarter of 2007. These increases in contract income and depreciation/amortization expense are partially offset by an increase in G&A of $11,102 (excluding depreciation).
     EBITDA from continuing operations for the nine months ended September 30, 2008 increased $144,058 (1,397.1 percent) to $133,747 from $(10,311) during the same period in 2007. The increase in EBITDA during the nine months ended September 30, 2008, is primarily a result of increased net income, provision for income taxes and depreciation and amortization. The primary factor driving increased net income is increased contract income of $145,526 (excluding depreciation) resulting from the growth of our project activity level and the execution of those projects. The increase in contract income (excluding depreciation) reflects an increase in contract margin of 3.5 percentage points to 14.8 percent during the nine months ended September 30, 2008, from 11.4 percent during the same period in 2007. The $28,657 increase in the provision for income taxes is primarily due to our improved operating results in the U.S. thereby resulting in more taxable income in the nine months ended 2008. The increase in depreciation and amortization is primarily a result of capital additions and capital expenditures in late 2007 and through the nine months ended 2008 to support the growth of our business and project activity levels. Additionally, the nine months ended September 30, 2008, include $7,828 of amortization of intangible assets related to our acquisition of InServ in the fourth quarter of 2007.

29


Table of Contents

These increases are partially offset by an increase in G&A of $41,066 (excluding depreciation). Also affecting EBITDA during the nine months ended September 30, 2008 were two significant non-recurring charges of $22,000 for government fines and $15,375 for the loss on early extinguishment of debt.
Discontinued Operations
     In 2006, we announced our intention to sell our assets and operations in Nigeria, which led to its classification as discontinued operations (“Discontinued Operations”). Furthermore, we sold our Nigeria assets and operations on February 7, 2007 to Ascot Offshore Nigeria Limited (“Ascot”) pursuant to a Share Purchase Agreement by and between us and Ascot (the “Agreement”).
     For the three months ended September 30, 2008, the income from Discontinued Operations was $1,219 or $0.03 per basic and diluted share. This compares to a loss from Discontinued Operations of $9,126 or $0.32 per basic and $0.26 per diluted share for the three months ended September 30, 2007. For the nine months ended September 30, 2008, income from Discontinued Operations was $3,042 or $0.08 per basic share and $0.07 per diluted share compared to a loss of $21,494 or $0.78 per basic and diluted share for the nine months ended September 30, 2007.
     Transition Services Agreement
     Concurrent with the sale of our Nigeria assets and Nigeria-based operations, we entered into a two-year Transition Services Agreement (“TSA”) with Ascot. Under the TSA, we were primarily providing equipment and labor in the form of seconded employees to work under the direction of Ascot. Ascot agreed to reimburse the Company for the seconded employee transition services costs. We have been working with Ascot to shift the transition services provided by the Company to direct services secured by Ascot. That effort is substantially complete in that we currently have no employees seconded to Ascot working in West Africa generally, or Nigeria specifically; however, the Company has one employee that continues to provide minimal services from the U.S.
     As previously discussed, we have made available certain equipment to Ascot for its use. This equipment was not sold to Ascot under the Agreement. Due to business and legal conditions in Nigeria, we recorded an impairment charge of $1,542 related to this equipment in the fourth quarter of 2007. Our remaining net book value for this equipment at September 30, 2008 was $641. This equipment is comprised primarily of construction equipment, rolling stock, and generator sets. The Company is in the process of redeploying this equipment for use in Oman.
     Ascot’s continued willingness and ability to perform our former projects in West Africa continue to be important factors to further reducing our risk profile in Nigeria and elsewhere in West Africa. There can be no assurance that we will be successful, if the need arises, in enforcing our indemnity rights against Ascot and Berkeley Group, plc (“Berkeley”), the parent company of Ascot.
     We are aware of one potential dispute related to our former projects in West Africa, specifically the West African Gas Pipeline (“WAGP”) contract. It is our understanding that Ascot and the West African Gas Pipeline Company Limited (“WAPCo”) are currently involved in a potential dispute. This dispute may result in a lengthy arbitration proceeding between WAPCo and the Ascot owned entity Willbros West Africa, Inc. (“WWAI”) in the London Court of International Arbitration to determine the validity of the alleged default notice issued by WAPCo to WWAI, including any resulting damage award, in combination with a lawsuit between WAPCo and us in the English Courts under English law to determine the enforceability, in whole or in part, of our parent guarantee, which we expect to be a lengthy process.
     If ultimately it is determined by an English Court that we are liable, in whole or in part, for damages that WAPCo may establish against WWAI for WWAI’s alleged non-performance of the WAGP contract, or if WAPCo is able to establish liability against the Company directly under our parent company guarantee, and, in either case, we are unable to enforce our rights under the indemnity agreement entered into with Ascot in connection with the WAGP contract, we may experience substantial losses. However, management cannot, at this time, predict the outcome of any arbitration or litigation which may ensue in this developing WAGP contract dispute, or be certain of the degree to which the indemnity agreement given in our favor by Ascot will protect the Company. Based upon our current knowledge of the relevant facts and circumstances, we do not expect that the outcome of the dispute will have a material adverse effect on our financial condition or results of operations.
     Additional financial disclosures on Discontinued Operations are provided in Note 13 - Discontinuance of Operations, Asset Disposals, and Transition Services Agreement.
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
     Our contract revenue and contract costs are significantly impacted by the capital budgets of our clients and the timing and location of development projects in the oil, gas and power industries worldwide. Contract revenue and cost vary by country from year-to-year as the result of: (a) entering and exiting work countries; (b) the execution of new contract awards; (c) the completion of contracts; and (d) the overall level of demand for our services.
     Our ability to be successful in obtaining and executing contracts can be affected by the relative strength or weakness of the U.S. dollar compared to the currencies of our competitors, our clients and our work locations.

30


Table of Contents

Three Months Ended September 30, 2008 Compared to Three Months Ended September 30, 2007
     Contract Revenue
     For the three months ended September 30, 2008, contract revenue increased $243,935 (98.9 percent) to $490,651 from $246,716 during the same period in 2007. The increase is primarily due to revenue growth across all segments as well as the acquisition of InServ in November of 2007. A quarter-to-quarter comparison of revenue is as follows:
                                 
    Three months ended September 30,  
                            Percent  
    2008     2007     Increase     Change  
Upstream O&G
  $ 342,064     $ 196,554     $ 145,510       74.0 %
Downstream O&G
    86,249       N/A       86,249       100.0 %
Engineering
    62,338       50,162       12,176       24.3 %
 
                         
Total
  $ 490,651     $ 246,716     $ 243,935       98.9 %
 
                         
     Upstream O&G revenue increased $145,510 (74.0 percent) to $342,064 from $196,554 in 2007. This favorable result consisted of increases in the U.S. of $137,307 (129.0 percent), Canada of $6,820 (10.1 percent) and Oman of $1,383 (6.1 percent). In the U.S., revenue increased primarily due to $62,231 of revenue earned on two new major pipeline projects which began in the latter part of 2007, $70,855 of revenue earned on a large EPC project in 2008, along with revenue from several new smaller projects in 2008. In Canada, the increase was primarily due to approximately $20,883 of work related to a new pipeline project in 2008, partially offset by a decrease related to 2007 projects now completed.
     Downstream O&G revenue was $86,249 for the three months ended September 30, 2008. There is no revenue in the 2007 comparable period as this revenue is the product of our acquisition of InServ in November 2007. Downstream O&G revenue consists of $30,650 from construction services, $14,080 from construction and turnaround work, $23,368 from field services, $10,676 from tank services, and $7,475 from fabrication work.
     Engineering revenue increased $12,176 (24.3 percent) to $62,338 from $50,162 in 2007. The increase in revenue is a result of increased demand for our pipeline and facility engineering services. The volume and size of projects performed in 2008 were significantly greater than in 2007. This increased activity level is reflected in the Engineering September 30, 2008 headcount of 657, up 14.5 percent over the same period in 2007, while maintaining very high utilization. In addition, the increased demand has resulted in significantly higher field service activity relating to right-of-way, environmental, and surveying.
     Operating Income
     For the three months ended September 30, 2008, operating income increased $12,013 to $28,735 from $16,722 during the same period in 2007. A quarter-to-quarter comparison of operating income is as follows:
                                                 
    Three months ended September 30,  
            Operating             Operating             Percent  
    2008     Margin %     2007(1)     Margin %     Increase     Change  
Upstream O&G
  $ 17,028       5.0 %   $ 13,433       6.8 %   $ 3,595       26.8 %
Downstream O&G
    4,723       5.5 %     N/A       N/A       4,723       100.0 %
Engineering
    6,984       11.2 %     3,289       6.6 %     3,695       112.3 %
 
                                         
Total
  $ 28,735       5.9 %   $ 16,722       6.8 %   $ 12,013       71.8 %
 
                                         
 
(1)   This table does not reflect a reduction in government fines of $2,000 in 2007 which is included in consolidated operating results. Government fines were characterized as a Corporate expense and are not allocated to the reporting segments.
     Upstream O&G operating income increased $3,595 to $17,028 from $13,433 in 2007. The increase in operating income was a result of previously discussed revenue increases, which resulted in a 26.2 percent increase in contract income. Overall, contract margins for Upstream O&G decreased, driven by a decrease in the U.S. where two major pipeline projects were at a lower margin percentage than projects during the same period in 2007. Contributing to our operating income was a net gain of approximately $3,000 resulting from discrete construction material procurement and disposition activities that we entered into in the third quarter. Offsetting the contract income increase was an increase in G&A expense of $3,355 as a result of increases in manpower and other costs required to support the 74.0 percent increase in revenue.
     Downstream O&G operating income was $4,723 for the three months ended September 30, 2008. There is no operating income in the 2007 comparable period as the Downstream O&G operating results are the product of our acquisition of InServ in November 2007. Operating income was negatively impacted $2,586 (3.0 percent) by the amortization of other intangible assets.
     Engineering operating income increased $3,695 (112.3 percent) to $6,984 from $3,289 in 2007. The increase in operating income was primarily a result of strong demand for engineering services enabling high utilization and increased headcount while maintaining solid margins and leveraging G&A expenses.

31


Table of Contents

     Non-Operating Items
     Provision for income taxes increased $1,976 to $8,057 from $6,081 in 2007. During the three months ended September 30, 2008, we recognized $8,057 of income tax expense on income from continuing operations before income taxes of $27,108 (an effective tax rate of 29.7 percent) as compared to income tax expense of $6,081 on income from continuing operations before income taxes of $16,353 (an effective tax rate of 37.2 percent) during the same period in 2007. The increase in the provision for income taxes is due to improved operating results, thereby generating more taxable income in the three months ended 2008 as compared to 2007. The circumstances that gave rise to the higher effective tax rate on lower income in 2007 was primarily due to expenses in Panama that received no tax benefit and the tax position taken on certain contract costs in 2008.
     For interim financial reporting, we record the tax provision based on an estimate of the effective tax rate for the year. During the three months ended September 30, 2008, we revised our annual estimated effective income tax rate from 42.0 percent to 38.5 percent. The reduction in the effective income tax rate is primarily attributed to tax positions taken in connection with costs associated with certain contracts and the deductibility of those costs. We continue to refine our corporate structure and overall tax strategy to increase tax efficiency.
     Discontinued Operations
     Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of taxes increased $10,345 (113.4 percent) to $1,219 of income from a loss of $9,126 during the same period in 2007. During the three months ended September 30, 2008, income from Discontinued Operations was primarily a result of $1,543 of additional cumulative gain on the sale of Nigeria assets and operations. The recognition of this gain in the current period is due to a reserve taken at the date of the sale for the fair value of issued letters of credit for Nigeria projects. As those letters of credit expire or are released, the liability or reserve is relieved resulting in additional income. Two letters of credit totaling $19,759 expired in August 2008. The loss incurred during the same period in 2007 was due to a $10,300 government fine related to profit disgorgement assessed in the third quarter of 2007.
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2008 Compared to Nine Months Ended September 30, 2007
     Contract Revenue
     For the nine months ended September 30, 2008, contract revenue increased $839,834 (137.6 percent) to $1,450,002 from $610,168 during the same period in 2007. The increase is primarily due to revenue growth across all segments as well as the acquisition of InServ in November of 2007. A period-to-period comparison of revenue is as follows:
                                 
    Nine months ended September 30,  
                            Percent  
    2008     2007     Increase     Change  
Upstream O&G
  $ 982,836     $ 482,104     $ 500,732       103.9 %
Downstream O&G
    278,995       N/A       278,995       100.0 %
Engineering
    188,171       128,064       60,107       46.9 %
 
                         
Total
  $ 1,450,002     $ 610,168     $ 839,834       137.6 %
 
                         
     Upstream O&G revenue increased $500,732 (103.9 percent) to $982,836 from $482,104 in 2007. This favorable result consisted of increases in the U.S. of $408,757 (162.2 percent), Canada of $88,298 (53.0 percent) and Oman of $3,679 (5.8 percent). In the U.S., revenue increased primarily because of $341,102 earned on two new major pipeline projects which began in the latter part of 2007 along with revenue from several new smaller projects. In Canada, the increase was primarily due to approximately $95,015 of work related to our new pipeline division. In Oman, the increase was primarily from a contract for oilfield construction services.
     Downstream O&G revenue was $278,995 for the nine months ended September 30, 2008. There is no revenue in the 2007 comparable period as this revenue is the product of our acquisition on InServ in November 2007. Downstream O&G revenue consists of $93,217 from construction services, $63,735 from field services, $48,845 from construction and turnaround work, $48,675 from tank services, and $24,523 from fabrication work.
     Engineering revenue increased $60,107 (46.9 percent) to $188,171 from $128,064 in 2007. The increase in revenue is a result of increased demand for pipeline and facility engineering services. The volume and size of projects performed in 2008 were significantly greater than in 2007. This increased activity level is reflected in the Engineering September 30, 2008 headcount of 657, up 14.5 percent over the same period in 2007, while maintaining very high utilization. In addition, the increased demand has resulted in significantly higher field service activity relating to right-of-way, environmental, and surveying.

32


Table of Contents

     Operating Income
     For the nine months ended September 30, 2008, operating income increased $83,695 (527.7 percent) to $99,555 from $15,860 during the same period in 2007. A period-to-period comparison of operating income is as follows:
                                                 
    Nine months ended September 30,  
            Operating             Operating             Percent  
    2008     Margin %     2007(1)     Margin %     Increase     Change  
Upstream O&G
  $ 57,792       5.9 %   $ 6,361       1.3 %   $ 51,431       808.5 %
Downstream O&G
    18,772       6.7 %     N/A       N/A       18,772       100.0 %
Engineering
    22,991       12.2 %     9,499       7.4 %     13,492       142.0 %
 
                                         
Total
  $ 99,555       6.9 %   $ 15,860       2.6 %   $ 83,695       527.7 %
 
                                         
 
(1)   This table does not reflect government fines of $22,000 in 2007 which is included in consolidated operating results. Government fines were characterized as a Corporate expense and are not allocated to the reporting segments.
     Upstream O&G operating income increased $51,431 (808.5 percent) to $57,792 from $6,361 in 2007. The increase in operating income was a result of previously discussed revenue increases, which resulted in a 167.2 percent increase in contract income. Overall, contract margins for Upstream O&G increased, with the most significant increase occurring in the U.S. where in 2007 severe weather impacted several lump sum projects. Contributing to our operating income was a net gain of approximately $3,000 resulting from discrete construction material procurement and disposition activities that we entered into in the third quarter. Offsetting the contract income increase was an increase in G&A expense of $14,990 as a result of increases in manpower and other costs required to support the 103.9 percent increase in revenue.
     Downstream O&G operating income was $18,772 for the nine months ended September 30, 2008. There is no operating income in the 2007 comparable period as the Downstream O&G operating results are the product of our acquisition of InServ in November 2007. Operating income was negatively impacted $7,828 (2.8 percent) by the amortization of other intangible assets.
     Engineering operating income increased $13,492 (142.0 percent) to $22,991 from $9,499 in 2007. The increase in operating income was primarily a result of strong demand for engineering services enabling high utilization and increased headcount while maintaining solid margins and leveraging G&A expenses.
     Non-Operating Items
     Interest, net expense increased $2,960 (139.7 percent) to $5,079 from $2,119 in 2007. The increase in net expense is primarily a result of $1,841 of decreased interest income earned on cash and cash equivalents. Additionally, interest expense increased $1,119 primarily due to increased capital lease obligations due to significant additions of capital equipment obtained through capital leases throughout late 2007 and 2008, partially offset by reduced interest expense as a result of the conversion of $63,093 in aggregate principal amount of the 2.75% and 6.5% senior convertible notes in 2007 and 2008.
     Loss on early extinguishment of debt decreased $15,375 (100.0 percent) to $0 in 2008. The loss on early extinguishment of debt recorded in 2007 is directly attributable to the induced conversion of approximately $52,450 of aggregate principal amount of our 6.5% Notes in which the entire loss was recognized during the second quarter of 2007.
     Provision for income taxes increased $28,657 to $36,450 from $7,793 in 2007. During the nine months ended September 30, 2008, we recognized $36,450 of income tax expense on income from continuing operations before income taxes of $94,680 (an effective tax rate of 38.5 percent) as compared to income tax expense of $7,793 on a loss from continuing operations before income taxes of $25,653 during the same period in 2007. The increase in the provision for income taxes is due to improved operating results; thereby generating more taxable income in the nine months ended 2008 as compared to 2007. The circumstances that resulted in recording a tax provision on losses during the nine months ended 2007 were primarily due to expenses in Panama that received no tax benefit. These charges include the $22,000 government fine and $15,375 loss on early extinguishment of debt.
     Discontinued Operations
     Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of taxes increased $24,536 (114.2 percent) to income of $3,042 from a loss of $21,494 during the same period in 2007. Income during the nine months ended September 30, 2008, consists of two pre-Nigeria sale insurance claim recoveries of $850 and $2,154 for events of loss the Company suffered prior to the sale of its Nigeria operations. Additionally, we have recognized $1,543 of additional cumulative gain on the sale of Nigeria assets and operations in 2008. The additional gain is the result of an aggregate amount of $19,759 of letters of credit expiring, for which the fair value of $1,543 of the letters of credit was reserved against the gain at the sale date. The income from the insurance recovery and additional gain on sale are partially offset by the net expenses of the TSA. The loss incurred during the same period in 2007 was primarily from 38 days of Nigeria operations prior to its sale on February 7, 2007 and the government fine of $10,300 related to profit disgorgement recognized in the third quarter of 2007. During the nine months ended September 30, 2008, cash provided by operating activities of Discontinued Operations increased $551 (18.5 percent) to cash provided of $3,531 from $2,980 during the same period in 2007.

33


Table of Contents

LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
     Our objective in financing our business is to maintain adequate financial resources and access to additional liquidity. During the nine months ended September 30, 2008, the results of our operations were our principal sources of funding. We anticipate that cash on hand, future cash flows from operations and the availability of our revolving credit facility will be sufficient to fund our working capital and capital expenditure requirement in the near term. However, we are reviewing all opportunities, including accessing the public markets to the extent that market conditions and other factors permit, to pursue business expansion opportunities including potential acquisitions. Our capital planning process is focused on utilizing cash in ways that enhance the value of our company. During the nine months ended September 30, 2008, we used cash from operations to fund working capital needs and certain capital expenditures.
Cash Flows
     Cash flows provided by (used in) continuing operations by type of activity were as follows for the nine months ended September 30, 2008 and 2007:
                 
    2008   2007
Operating activities
  $ 96,494     $ (22,629 )
Investing activities
    (23,943 )     66,952  
Financing activities
    (40,917 )     (28,445 )
     Statements of cash flows for entities with international operations that use the local currency as the functional currency exclude the effects of the changes in foreign currency exchange rates that occur during any given period, as these are non-cash charges. As a result, changes reflected in certain accounts on the consolidated condensed statements of cash flows may not reflect the changes in corresponding accounts on the consolidated condensed balance sheets.
     Operating Activities
     Operating activities of continuing operations provided $96,494 of cash in the nine months ended September 30, 2008, as compared to cash used of $22,629 in same period in 2007. Cash provided in operating activities increased $119,123 primarily due to:
    an increase in net income from continuing operations of $91,676 to $58,230 of income during the nine months ended September 30, 2008, as compared to a loss from continuing operations of $33,446 in the same period in 2007;
 
    an increase in cash flow from the change in working capital accounts of $35,977. The increase in cash flow from working capital accounts is primarily attributable the change in working capital accounts that generally trend with project activity levels. These include accounts receivable, contract cost and recognized income not yet billed, inventory, accounts payable and accrued liabilities and contract billings in excess of cost and recognized income. The increase associated with these working capital accounts are partially offset by the cash flow associated with prepaid expenses and accrued income taxes; and
 
    a decrease in non-cash charges of $8,530. This decrease is primarily attributable to the non-recurring $22,000 government fine and $15,375 loss on early extinguishment of debt recognized during the nine months ended 2008. This decrease is partially offset by increased depreciation and amortization of $20,765 and increased deferred compensation expense of $4,070. The increase in depreciation is reflective of the significant amount of capital additions to support the growth of our business and project activity level. Additionally, $7,828 of amortization of intangible assets is included in the nine months ended 2008 which were acquired in the acquisition on InServ in the fourth quarter of 2007. The increase in deferred compensation amortization is primarily a result of significant restricted stock awards granted in 2008.
     Investing Activities
     Investing activities of continuing operations used $23,943 of cash in the nine months ended September 30, 2008, compared to providing $66,952 during the same period in 2007. Cash flows from investing activities decreased $90,895 primarily due to:
    disposition of discontinued operations in the nine months ended September 30, 2007, which provided $105,568 of cash as compared to no dispositions in the same period in 2008;
 
    acquisition of a subsidiary in the nine months ended September 30, 2007, which used cash of $24,154 as compared to $846 of cash provided (working capital adjustment net of additional acquisition costs) during the same period in 2008; and
    purchases of property, plant, and equipment during the nine months ended September 30, 2008 used $28,122 of cash compared to $15,890 during the same period in 2007, an increase of $12,232. These purchases consisted primarily of construction equipment to support our increased project activity.

34


Table of Contents

     Financing Activities
     Financing activities of continuing operations used $40,917 of cash in the nine months ended September 30, 2008 compared to $28,445 in the same period in 2007. Cash flows from financing activities decreased $12,472 primarily due to:
    repayments of capital lease obligations during the nine months ended September 30, 2008 of $17,550 as compared to $7,507. We have accelerated repayment and retired certain capital lease obligations early as a part of our financial flexibility and financial management strategy;
 
    repayments of $12,575 of government fines during the nine months ended September 30, 2008 as compared to no repayments during the same period in 2007; and
 
    the two previous increased cash outflows in 2008 are partially offset by a non-recurring cash use in 2007 of $12,993. This amount relates to the cash used in inducing the conversion of part of our 6.5% senior convertible notes in 2007. No similar inducement has occurred in 2008.
Additional Sources of Capital
     Assets Held for Sale
     In July 2008, we decided to sell one of our fabrication facilities in Edmonton, Alberta, Canada. We will use the proceeds from this sale to support our fabrication and cross-country pipeline businesses in Canada as well as fund the acquisition of assets to support our operations growth in North America. We anticipate the sale of the facility in Canada will close before year-end.
     2007 Credit Facility
     Concurrent with our public offering and the InServ acquisition on November 20, 2007, we replaced our synthetic credit facility with a $150,000 senior secured revolving credit facility that can be increased to $200,000 with approval of the administrative agent. The entire facility is available for performance letters of credit and 33 percent of the facility is available for cash borrowings and financial letters of credit.
Capital Requirements
     During the nine months ended September 30, 2008, continuing operations provided cash of $31,135. We believe that our improved financial results, combined with our financial flexibility and financial management will ensure sufficient cash to meet our capital requirements. We will continue to evaluate capital leases as a means to acquire equipment such that we maintain financial flexibility and whenever favorable rates are available. As such, we are focused on the following significant capital requirements:
    providing working capital for projects in process and those scheduled to begin;
 
    procuring construction equipment;
 
    pursuing additional acquisitions that will allow us to expand our service offering; and
 
    making installment payments to the government related to fines and profit disgorgement.
     We believe that we will be able to support our ongoing working capital needs through our cash on hand, our operating cash flows and the availability of the cash borrowings under the 2007 Credit Facility, although we may be required to access the capital markets in the event we complete any significant acquisitions.
Contractual Obligations
     As of September 30, 2008, we have $91,407 of outstanding debt related to the convertible notes. In addition, we have entered into various capital leases of construction equipment and property resulting in aggregate capital lease obligations of $49,563 at September 30, 2008. We have acquired a note to finance insurance premiums in the amount of $12,754 which had a balance of $4,227 at September 30, 2008. We have an aggregate amount of $19,725 of government obligations. These obligations are due in three equal annual installments beginning in 2009.
     Other contractual obligations and commercial commitments, as detailed in our annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007, did not materially change except for payments made in the normal course of business.
NEW ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS
     See Note 2 — New Accounting Pronouncements in the Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements included in this Form 10-Q for a summary of recently issued accounting standards.

35


Table of Contents

FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
     This Form 10-Q includes “forward-looking statements”. All statements, other than statements of historical facts, included or incorporated by reference in this Form 10-Q that address activities, events or developments which we expect or anticipate will or may occur in the future, including such things as future capital expenditures (including the amount and nature thereof), oil, gas, gas liquids and power prices, demand for our services, the amount and nature of future investments by governments, expansion and other development trends of the energy industry, business strategy, expansion and growth of our business and operations, the outcome of government investigations and legal proceedings and other such matters are forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements are based on assumptions and analyses we made in light of our experience and our perception of historical trends, current conditions and expected future developments as well as other factors we believe are appropriate under the circumstances. However, whether actual results and developments will conform to our expectations and predictions is subject to a number of risks and uncertainties. As a result, actual results could differ materially from our expectations. Factors that could cause actual results to differ from those contemplated by our forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to, the following:
    curtailment of capital expenditures in the oil, gas, power, refining and petrochemical industries;
 
    cancellation of projects, in whole or in part;
 
    the consequences we may encounter if the terms and conditions of our final settlements with the DOJ and the SEC are not complied with, including the imposition of civil or criminal fines, penalties, enhanced monitoring arrangements, or other sanctions that might be imposed by the DOJ and SEC;
 
    the occurrence during the course of our operations of accidents and injuries to our personnel, as well as to third parties, that negatively affect our safety record, which is a factor used by many clients to pre-qualify and otherwise award work to contractors in our industry;
 
    the commencement by foreign governmental authorities of investigations into the actions of our current and former employees, and the determination that such actions constituted violations of foreign law;
 
    difficulties we may encounter in connection with the previous sale and disposition of our Nigeria assets and Nigeria based operations, including without limitation, obtaining indemnification for any losses we may experience if, due to the non-performance of Ascot, claims are made against any parent company guarantees we provided and which remained in place, in varying degrees, subsequent to the closing;
 
    the dishonesty of employees and/or other representatives or their refusal to abide by applicable laws and our established policies and rules;
 
    adverse weather conditions not anticipated in bids and estimates;
 
    project cost overruns, unforeseen schedule delays, and the application of liquidated damages;
 
    failing to realize cost recoveries from projects completed or in progress within a reasonable period after completion of the relevant project;
 
    inability to hire and retain sufficient skilled labor to execute our current work, our work in backlog and future work we have not yet been awarded;
 
    inability to execute cost-reimbursable projects within the target cost, thus eroding contract margin but not contract income on the project;
 
    political or social circumstances impeding the progress of our work and increasing the cost of performance;
 
    failure to obtain the timely award of one or more projects;
 
    inability to identify and acquire suitable acquisition targets on reasonable terms;
 
    inability to obtain adequate financing;
 
    inability to obtain sufficient surety bonds or letters of credit;
 
    loss of the services of key management personnel;
 
    the demand for energy moderating or diminishing;

36


Table of Contents

    downturns in general economic, market or business conditions in our target markets;
 
    changes in the effective tax rate in countries where our work will be performed;
 
    changes in applicable laws or regulations, or changed interpretations thereof;
 
    changes in the scope of our expected insurance coverage;
 
    inability to manage insurable risk at an affordable cost;
 
    the occurrence of the risk factors included elsewhere in this Form 10-Q or in our other reports and filings with the SEC; and
 
    other factors, most of which are beyond our control.
     Consequently, all of the forward-looking statements made in the this Form 10-Q are qualified by these cautionary statements and there can be no assurance that the actual results or developments we anticipate will be realized or, even if substantially realized, that they will have the consequences for, or effects on, our business or operations that we anticipate today. We assume no obligation to update publicly any such forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise. For a more complete description of the circumstances surrounding the actions of our current and former employees, see the Risk Factors included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007.
     Unless the context otherwise requires, all references in this Form 10-Q to “Willbros,” the “Company,” “we,” “us” and “our” refer to Willbros Group, Inc., its consolidated subsidiaries and their predecessors.

37


Table of Contents

ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
     Our primary market risk is our exposure to changes in non-U.S. currency exchange rates. We attempt to negotiate contracts which provide for payment in U.S. dollars, but we may be required to take all or a portion of payment under a contract in another currency. To mitigate non-U.S. currency exchange risk, we seek to match anticipated non-U.S. currency revenue with expenses in the same currency whenever possible. To the extent we are unable to match non-U.S. currency revenue with expenses in the same currency, we may use forward contracts, options or other common hedging techniques in the same non-U.S. currencies. We had no forward contracts or options at September 30, 2008 and 2007 or during the nine months then ended.
     The carrying amounts for cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable, notes payable and accounts payable, and accrued liabilities shown in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets approximate fair value at September 30, 2008, due to the generally short maturities of these items. At September 30, 2008, our investments were primarily in short-term dollar denominated bank deposits with maturities of a few days, or in longer-term deposits where funds can be withdrawn on demand without penalty. We have the ability and expect to hold our investments to maturity.
     Our exposure to market risk for changes in interest rates relates primarily to our long-term debt. At September 30, 2008, our only indebtedness subject to variable interest rates is certain capital lease obligations.
ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
(a) Disclosure Controls and Procedures
     Disclosure controls and procedures are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in reports filed or submitted under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms. Disclosure controls and procedures include, without limitation, controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to management, including the principal executive and financial officers, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. There are inherent limitations to the effectiveness of any system of disclosure controls and procedures, including the possibility of human error and the circumvention or overriding of the controls and procedures. Accordingly, even effective disclosure controls and procedures can only provide reasonable assurance of achieving their control objectives.
     Our management, with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) under the Exchange Act) as of September 30, 2008. Based on this evaluation, our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, concluded that, as of September 30, 2008 the disclosure controls and procedures are effective in alerting them on a timely basis to material information required to be included in our filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
(b) Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
     During the quarter ended September 30, 2008, there were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting that materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

38


Table of Contents

PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. Legal Proceedings
     For information regarding legal proceedings, see “Item 3. Legal Proceedings” of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007, and Note 12 — Contingencies, Commitments and Other Circumstances of our “Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements” in Item 1 of Part I of this Form 10-Q, which information from Note 12 as to legal proceedings is incorporated by reference herein.
Item 1A. Risk Factors
     Except as set forth below, there have been no material changes in risk factors involving us from those previously disclosed in Item 1A of Part I in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007 and in Item 1A of Part II of our Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2008.
Our business is highly dependent upon the level of capital expenditures by oil, gas and power companies on infrastructure.
     Our revenue and cash flow are primarily dependent upon major engineering and construction projects. The availability of these types of projects is dependent upon the economic condition of the oil, gas and power industries, specifically, the level of capital expenditures of oil, gas and power companies on infrastructure. The current credit crisis and related turmoil in the global financial system, including the capital markets, as well as a general economic downturn or recession in North America and/or globally, may have an adverse impact on the level of capital expenditures of oil, gas and power companies and/or their ability to finance these expenditures. Our failure to obtain major projects, the delay in awards of major projects, the cancellation of major projects or delays in completion of contracts are factors that could result in the under-utilization of our resources, which would have an adverse impact on our revenue and cash flow. There are numerous factors beyond our control that influence the level of capital expenditures of oil, gas and power companies, including:
    current and projected oil, gas and power prices as well as refining margins;
 
    the demand for electricity;
 
    the abilities of oil, gas and power companies to generate, access and deploy capital;
 
    exploration, production and transportation costs;
 
    the discovery rate of new oil and gas reserves;
 
    the sale and expiration dates of oil and gas leases and concessions;
 
    regulatory restraints on the rates that power companies may charge their customers;
 
    local and international political and economic conditions;
 
    the ability or willingness of host country government entities to fund their budgetary commitments; and
 
    technological advances.
We may continue to experience losses associated with our prior Nigeria based operations.
     In February 2007, we completed the sale of our Nigerian operations. In August 2007, we and our subsidiary, Willbros International Services (Nigeria) Limited, entered into a Global Settlement Agreement with Ascot Offshore Nigeria Limited (“Ascot”), the purchaser of our Nigerian operations and Berkeley Group Plc, the purchaser’s parent company. Among the other matters, the Global Settlement Agreement provided for the payment of an amount in full and final settlement of all disputes between Ascot and Willbros (“the Company”) related to the working capital adjustment to the closing purchase price under the February 2007 share purchase agreement. In connection with the sale of our Nigerian operations, we also entered into a Transition Services Agreement, and Ascot delivered a promissory note in favor of the Company.
     The Global Settlement Agreement provided for a settlement in the amount of $25.0 million, the amount by which we and Ascot agreed to adjust the closing purchase price downward (the “Settlement Amount”). Under the Global Settlement Agreement, we retained approximately $13.9 million of the Settlement Amount and credited this amount to the account of Ascot for amounts which were due to the Company under the Transition Services Agreement and promissory note. Our payment of the balance of the Settlement Amount settled (a) any and all obligations and disputes between Ascot and the Company in relation to the adjustment to the closing purchase price under the share purchase agreement and (b) all of the parties’ respective rights and obligations under the indemnification provisions of the share purchase agreement, except as provided in the Global Settlement Agreement.

39


Table of Contents

     As part consideration for the parties’ agreement on the Settlement Amount, Ascot obtained from a non-Nigerian bank supplemental backstop letters of credit totaling approximately $20.3 million, which backstopped corresponding letter of credit obligations that we had under various contracts taken over by Ascot. During the three months ended September 30, 2008, substantially all of our letters of credit related to our former operations in Nigeria expired, with only one $123,000 letter of credit still outstanding.
     We may, however, continue to experience losses or incur expenses subsequent to the sale and disposition of our operations and the Global Settlement Agreement. In particular:
    The same difficulties which led to our leaving Nigeria continue to exist for Ascot, as well as additional challenges, including various financial difficulties that we understand Ascot may from time to time be experiencing. Accordingly, Ascot’s continued willingness and ability to perform our former projects in West Africa continue to be important factors to further reducing our risk profile in Nigeria and elsewhere in West Africa.
 
    We issued parent company guarantees to our former clients in connection with the performance of some of our contracts in Nigeria and nearby West Africa locations. Although Ascot is now responsible for completing these projects, our parent company guarantees may remain in force in varying degrees until the projects are completed. Indemnities are in place pursuant to which Ascot and its parent company are obligated to indemnify the Company for any losses we incur on these parent company guarantees. However, we can provide no assurance that we will be successful in enforcing our indemnity rights. The guarantees include five projects under which we estimated that, at February 7, 2007, there was aggregate remaining contract revenue of approximately $352.1 million and aggregate cost to complete of approximately $293.6 million.
 
    In early 2008, we received our first notification asserting various rights under one of our outstanding parent guarantees. On February 1, 2008, WWAI, the Ascot company performing the West African Gas Pipeline (“WAGP”) contract, received a letter from West African Gas Pipeline Company Limited (“WAPCo”), the owner of WAGP, wherein WAPCo gave written notice alleging that WWAI was in default under the WAGP contract, as amended, and giving WWAI a brief cure period to remedy the alleged default. We understand that WWAI responded by denying being in breach of its WAGP contract obligations, and apparently also advised WAPCo that WWAI “...requires a further $55 million, without which it will not be able to complete the work which it had previously undertaken to perform.” We understand that, on February 27, 2008, WAPCo terminated the WAGP contract for the alleged continuing non-performance of WWAI.
 
      Also, on February 1, 2008, we received a letter from WAPCo reminding us of our parent guarantee on the WAGP contract and requesting that we remedy WWAI’s default under that contract, as amended. On previous occasions, we have advised WAPCo that, for a variety of legal, contractual, and other reasons, we did not consider our prior WAGP contract parent guarantee to have continued application, and we reiterated that position to WAPCo in our response to its February 1, 2008 letter. WAPCo disputes our position that we are no longer bound by the terms of our prior parent guarantee of the WAGP contract and has reserved all its rights in that regard. Currently, the WAGP project is at a stand still for a variety of technical and commercial issues unrelated to WAPCo’s termination of the WAGP contract.
 
      We anticipate that this potential dispute with WAPCo may result in a lengthy arbitration proceeding between WAPCo and WWAI in the London Court of International Arbitration to determine the validity of the alleged default notice issued by WAPCo to WWAI, including any resulting damage award, in combination with a lawsuit between WAPCo and us in the English Courts under English law to determine the enforceability, in whole or in part, of our parent guarantee, which we expect to be a lengthy process.
 
      We currently have no employees working in Nigeria and we have no intention of returning to Nigeria. If ultimately it is determined by an English Court that we are liable, in whole or in part, for damages that WAPCo may establish against WWAI for WWAI’s alleged non-performance of the WAGP contract, or if WAPCo is able to establish liability against the Company directly under our parent company guarantee, and, in either case, we are unable to enforce our rights under the indemnity agreement entered into with Ascot in connection with the WAGP contract, we may experience substantial losses. However, management cannot, at this time, predict the outcome of any arbitration or litigation which may ensue in this developing WAGP contract dispute, or be certain of the degree to which the indemnity agreement given in our favor by Ascot will protect the Company. Based upon our current knowledge of the relevant facts and circumstances, we do not expect that the outcome of the potential dispute will have a material adverse effect on our financial condition or results of operations.
Our common stock, which is listed on the New York Stock Exchange, has from time to time experienced significant price and volume fluctuations. These fluctuations are likely to continue in the future, and you may not be able to resell your shares of common stock at or above the purchase price paid by you.

40


Table of Contents

     The market price of our common stock may change significantly in response to various factors and events beyond our control, including the following:
    the risk factors described in this Form 10-Q and in our other reports and filings with the SEC;
 
    a shortfall in operating revenue or net income from that expected by securities analysts and investors;
 
    changes in securities analysts’ estimates of our financial performance or the financial performance of our competitors or companies in our industry generally;
 
    general conditions in our customers’ industries; and
 
    general conditions in the securities markets.
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
     The following table provides information about purchases of our common stock by us during the quarter ended September 30, 2008:
                                 
                    Total Number     Maximum  
                    of Shares     Number (or  
                    Purchased as     Approximate  
                Part of     Dollar Value) of  
    Total             Publicly     Shares That May  
    Number of     Average Price     Announced     Yet Be Purchased  
    Shares     Paid Per     Plans or     Under the Plans  
    Purchased (1)     Share (2)     Programs     or Programs  
July 1, 2008 – July 31, 2008
    78,750     $ 43.54              
August 1, 2008 – August 31, 2008
    3,246       42.38              
September 1, 2008 – September 30, 2008
    237       30.25              
 
                       
Total
    82,233     $ 43.46              
 
                       
 
(1)   Shares of common stock acquired from certain of our officers and key employees under the share withholding provisions of our 1996 Stock Plan for the payment of taxes associated with the vesting of shares of restricted stock or delivery of shares underlying vested restricted stock rights granted under such plan.
 
(2)   The price paid per common share represents the closing sales price of a share of our common stock, as reported in the New York Stock Exchange composite transactions, on the day that the stock was acquired by us.
Item 3. Defaults upon Senior Securities
     Not applicable.
Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
     Not applicable.
Item 5. Other Information
     Not applicable.
Item 6. Exhibits
     The following documents are included as exhibits to this Form 10-Q. Those exhibits below incorporated by reference herein are indicated as such by the information supplied in the parenthetical thereafter. If no parenthetical appears after an exhibit, such exhibit is filed herewith.
  31.1   Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
 
  31.2   Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
 
  32.1   Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
 
  32.2   Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

41


Table of Contents

SIGNATURE
     Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
         
  WILLBROS GROUP, INC.
 
 
Date: November 5, 2008  By:   /s/ Van A. Welch    
    Van A. Welch   
    Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer and Principal
Accounting Officer) 
 
 

42


Table of Contents

EXHIBIT INDEX
     The following documents are included as exhibits to this Form 10-Q. Those exhibits below incorporated by reference herein are indicated as such by the information supplied in the parenthetical thereafter. If no parenthetical appears after an exhibit, such exhibit is filed herewith.
     
Exhibit    
Number   Description
 
31.1
  Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
 
   
31.2
  Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
 
   
32.1
  Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
 
   
32.2
  Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

43