e10vk
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
Form 10-K
Annual
Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
For the fiscal year ended January 31, 2007 Commission File Number 000-50421
CONNS, INC.
(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in its Charter)
|
|
|
A Delaware Corporation
|
|
06-1672840 |
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)
|
|
(I.R.S. Employer Identification Number) |
3295 College Street
Beaumont, Texas 77701
(Address of Principal Executive Offices)
(409) 832-1696
(Registrants Telephone Number, Including Area Code)
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
|
|
|
Title of Each Class
|
|
Name of Exchange on Which Registered |
|
|
|
Common Stock, par value $0.01 per share
|
|
The NASDAQ Global Select Market, Inc |
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:
NONE
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in
Rule 405 of the Securities Act.
Yes o No þ
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section
13 or Section 15(d) of the Act.
Yes o No þ
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (l) has filed all reports required to be filed
by Section l3 or l5(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of l934 during the preceding l2 months (or
for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation
S-K (§229.405 of this chapter) is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of
registrants knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in
Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated
filer, or a non-accelerated filer. See definition of accelerated filer and large accelerated
filer in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check One):
Large accelerated filer o Accelerated filer þ Non-accelerated filer o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of
the Act). Yes o No þ
The aggregate market value of the voting and non-voting common equity held by non-affiliates
as of July 31, 2006 was approximately $175.1 million based on the closing price of the
registrants common stock as reported on the NASDAQ Global
Select Market, Inc.
There were 23,809,522 shares of common stock, $0.01 par value per share, outstanding on March
26, 2007.
DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE:
Portions of the Definitive Proxy Statement for the Annual Meeting of Stockholders
to be held May 30, 2007 (incorporated herein by reference in Part III).
PART I
ITEM 1. BUSINESS.
Unless the context indicates otherwise, references to we, us, and our refer to the
consolidated business operations of Conns, Inc. and all of its direct and indirect subsidiaries,
limited liability companies and limited partnerships.
Overview
We are a specialty retailer of home appliances and consumer electronics. We sell major home
appliances including refrigerators, freezers, washers, dryers and ranges, and a variety of consumer
electronics including micro-display projection, and plasma and LCD flat panel televisions,
camcorders, digital cameras, DVD players and home theater products. We also sell home office
equipment, lawn and garden equipment, mattresses and furniture and we continue to introduce
additional product categories for the home and for consumer entertainment, such as MP3 players, to
help increase same store sales and to respond to our customers product needs. We offer over 2,500
product items, or SKUs, at good-better-best price points representing such national brands as
General Electric, Whirlpool, Frigidaire, Maytag, LG, Mitsubishi, Samsung, Sony, Toshiba, Hitachi,
Apple, Serta, Ashley, Lane, Hewlett Packard, Compaq, Poulan, Husqvarna and Toro. Based on revenue
in 2005, we were the 9th largest retailer of home appliances and the 37th
largest retailer of consumer electronics in the United States. Additionally, historically we are
the second or third leading retailer of home appliances in terms of market share in the majority of
our established markets. Likewise, in the home entertainment product categories in which we
compete, we rank third or fourth in market share in the majority of our established markets.
We began as a small plumbing and heating business in 1890. We began selling home appliances
to the retail market in 1937 through one store located in Beaumont, Texas. We opened our second
store in 1959 and have since grown to 62 stores.
We have been known for providing excellent customer service for over 115
years. We believe that our customer-focused business strategies make us an attractive alternative
to appliance and electronics superstores, department stores and other national, regional and local
retailers. We strive to provide our customers with:
|
|
|
a high level of customer service; |
|
|
|
|
highly trained and knowledgeable sales personnel; |
|
|
|
|
a broad range of competitively priced, customer-driven, brand name products; |
|
|
|
|
flexible financing alternatives through our proprietary credit programs; |
|
|
|
|
next day delivery capabilities; and |
|
|
|
|
outstanding product repair service. |
We believe that these strategies drive repeat purchases and enable us to generate
substantial brand name recognition and customer loyalty. During fiscal 2007, approximately 61% of
our credit customers, based on the number of invoices written, were repeat customers.
In 1994, we realigned and added to our management team, enhanced our infrastructure and
refined our operating strategy to position ourselves for future growth. From fiscal 1994 to fiscal
1999, we selectively grew our store base from 21 to 26 stores while improving operating margins
from 5.2% to 8.7%. Since fiscal 1999, we have generated significant growth in our number of stores,
revenue and profitability. Specifically:
|
|
|
we have grown from 26 stores to 62 stores, an increase of over 138%, with several more
stores currently under development; |
|
|
|
|
total revenues have grown 224%, at a compounded annual rate of 15.8%, from $234.5
million in fiscal 1999, to $760.6 million in fiscal 2007; |
3
|
|
|
net income from continuing operations
has grown 358%, at a compounded annual
rate of 20.9%, from $8.8 million in fiscal
1999 to $40.3 million in fiscal 2007; and |
|
|
|
|
our same store sales growth from
fiscal 1999 through fiscal 2007 has
averaged 8.6%; it was 3.6% for fiscal
2007. See additional discussion about
same store sales under Managements
Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations. |
Our principal executives offices are located at 3295 College Street, Beaumont, Texas 77701.
Our telephone number is (409) 832-1696, and our corporate website is www.conns.com. We do not
intend for information contained on our website to be part of this Form 10-K.
Corporate Reorganization
We were formed as a Delaware corporation in January 2003 with an initial capitalization of
$1,000 to become the holding company of Conn Appliances, Inc., a Texas corporation. Prior to the
completion of our initial public offering (the IPO) in November 2003, we had no operations. As a
result of the IPO, Conn Appliances, Inc. became our wholly-owned subsidiary and the common and
preferred stockholders of Conn Appliances, Inc. exchanged their common and preferred stock on a
one-for-one basis for the common and preferred stock of Conns, Inc. Immediately after the IPO,
all preferred stock and accumulated dividends were redeemed, either through the payment of cash or
through the conversion of preferred stock to common stock.
Industry Overview
The home appliance and consumer electronics industry includes major home appliances,
small appliances, home office equipment and software, micro-display projection and plasma and LCD
flat panel televisions, and audio, video and portable electronics. Sellers of home appliances and
consumer electronics include large appliance and electronics superstores, national chains, small
regional chains, single-store operators, appliance and consumer electronics departments of selected
department and discount stores and home improvement centers.
Based on data published in Twice, This Week in Consumer Electronics, a weekly magazine
dedicated to the home appliances and consumer electronics industry in the United States, the top
100 major appliance retailers reported sales of approximately $22.8 billion in 2005, up
approximately 3.2% from reported sales in 2004 of approximately $22.1 billion. The retail appliance
market is large and concentrated among a few major dealers. Sears has been the leader in the retail
appliance market, with a market share of the top 100 retailers of approximately 39% in both 2004
and 2005. Lowes and Home Depot held the second and third place positions, respectively, in
national market share in 2005.
As measured by Twice, the top 100 consumer electronics retailers in the United States
reported equipment and software sales of $108.2 billion in 2005, a 11.9% increase from the $96.7
billion reported in 2004. According to the Consumer Electronics Association, or CEA, total industry
manufacturer sales of consumer electronics products in the United States, are projected to exceed
$155 billion in 2007, up from $145 billion in 2006. The consumer electronics market is highly
fragmented. We estimate, based on data provided in Twice, that the two largest consumer electronics
superstore chains together accounted for approximately 32% of the total electronics sales
attributable to the 100 largest retailers in 2005. New entrants in both the home appliances and
consumer electronics industries have been successful in gaining market share by offering similar
product selections at lower prices.
In the home appliance market, many factors drive growth, including consumer confidence,
household formations and new product introductions. Product design and innovation is rapidly
becoming a key driver of growth in this market. Products either recently introduced or scheduled to
be offered include high efficiency, front-loading laundry appliances, three door refrigerators,
double ovens, free-standing ranges, cabinet style dishwashers, and dual fuel cooking appliances.
Technological advancements and the introduction of new products have largely driven
growth in the consumer electronics market. Recently, industry growth has been fueled primarily by
the introduction of products that incorporate digital technology, such as portable and traditional DVD players,
digital cameras and camcorders, digital stereo receivers, satellite technology, MP3 products and
high definition flat panel
4
and projection televisions. Digital products offer significant
advantages over their analog counterparts, including better clarity and quality of video and audio,
durability of recording and compatibility with computers. Due to these advantages, we believe that
digital technology will continue to drive industry growth as consumers replace their analog
products with digital products. We believe the following product advancements will continue to fuel
growth in the consumer electronics industry and that they offer us the potential for significant
sales growth:
|
|
|
Digital Television (DTV and High Definition TV).
The Federal Communications Commission has set a hard
date of February 17, 2009 for all commercial television
stations to transition from broadcasting analog signals
to digital signals. The Yankee Group, a communications
and networking research and consulting firm, estimates
that by the year 2010, HDTV signals will be in nearly
80 million homes in the United States. To view a
digital transmission, consumers will need either a
digital television or a set-top box converter capable
of converting the digital broadcast for viewing on an
analog set. We believe the high clarity digital flat
panel televisions in both liquid crystal display (LCD),
and plasma formats has increased the quality and
sophistication of these entertainment products and will
be a key driver of digital television growth as more
digital and high definition content is made available
either through traditional distribution methods or
through emerging content delivery systems. As prices
continue to drop on such products, they become
increasingly attractive to larger and more diverse
group of consumers. |
|
|
|
|
Digital Versatile Disc (DVD). According to the
CEA, the DVD player has been the fastest growing
consumer electronics product in history. First
introduced in March 1997, DVD players are currently in
80% of U.S. homes. We believe newer technology based
on the DVD delivery system, such as high definition
DVD, blu-ray, and portable players will continue to
drive consumer interest in this entertainment category. |
|
|
|
|
Portable electronics. Compressed-music portables,
represented most notably by the Apple iPod, enjoy
significant growth, and accounted for over 85% of total
dollar sales of portable audio products in 2006
according to the CEA as reported in TWICE magazine. |
Business Strategy
Our objective is to be the leading specialty retailer of home appliances and consumer
electronics in each of our markets. We strive to achieve this objective through a continuing focus
on superior execution in five key areas: merchandising, consumer credit, distribution, product
service and training. Successful execution in each area relies on the following strategies:
|
|
|
Providing a high level of customer service. We
endeavor to maintain a very high level of customer
service as a key component of our culture, which has
resulted in average customer satisfaction levels of
approximately 91% over the past three years. We measure
customer satisfaction on the sales floor, in our
delivery operation and in our service department by
sending survey cards to all customers to whom we have
delivered or installed a product or made a service
call. Our customer service resolution department
attempts to address all customer complaints within 48
hours of receipt. |
|
|
|
|
Developing and retaining highly trained and
knowledgeable sales personnel. We require all sales
personnel to specialize in home appliances, consumer
electronics or track products. Some of our sales
associates qualify in more than one specialty. Track
products include small appliances, computers,
camcorders, DVD players, cameras, MP3 players and
telephones that are sold within the interior of a large
colorful track that circles the interior floor of our
stores. This specialized approach allows the sales
person to focus on specific product categories and
become an expert in selling and using products in those
categories. New sales personnel must complete an
intensive two-week classroom training program conducted
at our corporate office and an additional week of
on-the-job training riding in a delivery and a service
truck to observe how we serve our customers after the
sale is made. |
|
|
|
|
Offering a broad range of customer-driven, brand
name products. We offer a comprehensive selection of
high-quality, brand name merchandise to our customers
at guaranteed low prices. Consistent with our
good-better-best merchandising strategy, we offer a
wide range of product selections from entry-level
models through high-end models. We maintain strong
relationships with |
5
|
|
|
the approximately 40 manufacturers
and distributors that enable us to offer over 2,500
SKUs to our customers. Our principal suppliers include
General Electric, Whirlpool, Frigidaire, Maytag, LG,
Mitsubishi, Samsung, Sony, Toshiba, Hitachi, Apple,
Serta, Ashley, Lane, Hewlett Packard, Compaq, Poulan,
Husqvarna and Toro. To facilitate our responsiveness to
customer demand, we test the sales process of all new
products and obtain customers reactions to new display
formats before introducing these products and display
formats to all of our stores. |
|
|
|
Offering flexible financing alternatives through
our proprietary credit programs. In the last three
years, we financed, on average, approximately 58% of
our retail sales through our internal credit programs.
We believe our credit programs expand our potential
customer base, increase our sales revenue and enhance
customer loyalty by providing our customers immediate
access to financing alternatives that our competitors
typically do not offer. Our credit department makes all
credit decisions internally, entirely independent of
our sales personnel. We provide special consideration
to the customers credit history with us. Before
extending credit, we match our loss experience by
product category with the customers credit worthiness
to determine down payment amounts and other credit
terms. This facilitates product sales while keeping our
credit risk within an acceptable range. We provide a
full range of credit products, including interest-free
programs for the highest credit quality customers and
our secondary portfolio for our credit challenged
customers. The secondary portfolio, which has
generally lower average credit scores than our primary
portfolio, undergoes more intense internal underwriting
scrutiny to mitigate the inherently greater risk.
Approximately 56% of customers who have active credit
accounts with us take advantage of our in-store payment
option and come to our stores each month to make their
payments, which we believe results in additional sales
to these customers. Through our predictive dialing
program, we contact customers with past due accounts
daily and attempt to work with them to collect payments
in times of financial difficulty or periods of economic
downturn. Our credit decisions and collections process
enabled us to achieve an average net loss ratio of 2.8%
over the past three years on the credit portfolio that
we service for a Qualifying Special Purpose Entity or
QSPE. |
|
|
|
|
Maintaining next day distribution capabilities.
We maintain five regional distribution centers and two
other related facilities that cover all of the major
markets in which we operate. These facilities are part
of a sophisticated inventory management system that
also includes a fleet of approximately 120 transfer and
delivery vehicles that service all of our markets. Our
distribution operations enable us to deliver products
on the day after the sale for approximately 94% of our
customers who scheduled delivery during that timeframe. |
|
|
|
|
Providing outstanding product repair service.
We service every product that we sell, and we service
only the products that we sell. In this way, we can
assure our customers that they will receive our service
technicians exclusive attention to their product
repair needs. All of our service centers are authorized
factory service facilities that provide trained
technicians to offer in-home diagnostic and repair
service as well as on-site service and repairs for
products that cannot be repaired in the customers
home. |
Store Development and Growth Strategy
In addition to executing our business strategy, we intend to continue to achieve profitable,
controlled growth by increasing same store sales, opening new stores and updating, expanding or
relocating our existing stores.
|
|
|
Increasing same store sales. We plan to continue to increase our same store sales by: |
|
|
|
continuing to offer quality products at competitive prices; |
|
|
|
|
re-merchandising our product offerings in response to changes in consumer demand; |
|
|
|
|
adding new merchandise to our existing product lines; |
|
|
|
|
training our sales personnel to increase sales closing rates; |
|
|
|
|
updating our stores as needed; |
6
|
|
|
continuing to promote sales of computers and
smaller electronics, including the expansion of high
margin accessory items; |
|
|
|
|
continuing to provide a high level of customer
service in sales, delivery and servicing of our
products; and |
|
|
|
|
increasing sales of our merchandise, finance
products, service maintenance agreements and credit
insurance through direct mail and in-store credit
promotion programs. |
|
|
|
Opening new stores. We intend to
take advantage of our reliable
infrastructure and proven store model to
continue the pace of our new store openings
by opening six to eight new stores in
fiscal 2008. This infrastructure includes
our proprietary management information
systems, training processes, distribution
network, merchandising capabilities,
supplier relationships, product service
capabilities and centralized credit
approval and collection processes. We
intend to expand our store base in
existing, adjacent and new markets, as
follows: |
|
|
|
Existing and adjacent markets. We intend to
increase our market presence by opening new stores in
our existing markets and in adjacent markets as we
identify the need and opportunity. New store openings
in these locations will allow us to maximize
opportunity in those markets and leverage our existing
distribution network, advertising presence, brand name
recognition and reputation. In fiscal 2007 we opened
new stores in Houston, Dallas and San Antonio. |
|
|
|
|
New markets. We have identified several new
markets that meet our criteria for site selection,
including South Texas, East Texas, central Louisiana
around Shreveport, Monroe and Alexandria, southern
Oklahoma and southwest Arkansas. We intend to consider
these new markets, as well as others, over the next
several fiscal years. We intend to first address
markets in states in which we currently operate. We
expect that this new store growth will include major
metropolitan markets in both Texas and Louisiana. We
have also identified a number of smaller markets within
Texas and Louisiana in which we expect to explore new
store opportunities. Our long-term growth plans include
markets in other areas of significant population
density in neighboring states. |
|
|
|
Updating, expanding or relocating existing stores.
Over the last three years, we have updated, expanded
or relocated most of our stores. We have implemented
our larger prototype store model at all locations in
which the market demands support such store size, and
where available physical space would accommodate the
required design changes. As we continue to add new
stores or replace existing stores, we intend to modify
our floor plan to include elements of this new model.
We continuously evaluate our existing and potential
sites to ensure our stores are in the best possible
locations and relocate stores that are not properly
positioned. We typically lease rather than purchase our
stores to retain the flexibility of managing our
financial commitment to a location if we later decide
that the store is performing below our standards or the
market would be better served by a relocation. After
updating, expanding or relocating a store, we expect to
increase same store sales at those stores. |
The addition of new stores has played, and we believe will continue to play, a significant
role in our continued growth and success. We currently operate 62 retail stores located in Texas
and Louisiana. We opened six stores in each of fiscal 2005, 2006 and 2007. We also closed one
clearance store in one of our markets in fiscal 2005. We plan to continue our store development
program by opening an additional six to eight new stores, or an approximately 10% increase in total
retail floor space, per year and continue to update a portion of our existing stores each year. We
believe that continuing our strategies of updating existing stores,
growing our store base and locating our stores in desirable geographic markets are essential
for our future success.
Customers
We do not have a significant concentration of sales with any individual customer and,
therefore, the loss of any one customer would not have a material impact on our business. No
single customer accounts
for more than 10% of our total revenues; in fact, no single customer
accounted for more than $500,000 (less than 0.1%) of our total revenue of $760.6 million during the
year ended January 31, 2007.
7
Products and Merchandising
Product Categories. Each of our stores sells five major categories of products: major
home appliances, consumer electronics, computers and peripheral equipment, delivery and
installation services and other household products, including furniture, lawn and garden equipment
and mattresses. The following table, which has been adjusted from previous filings to ensure
comparability, presents a summary of net sales by major product category, service maintenance
agreement commissions and service revenues, for the years ended January 31, 2005, 2006, and 2007:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended January 31, |
|
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
Amount |
|
|
% |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
% |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
% |
|
Major home appliances |
|
$ |
168,544 |
|
|
|
34.1 |
% |
|
$ |
223,294 |
|
|
|
36.0 |
% |
|
$ |
230,963 |
|
|
|
34.1 |
% |
Consumer electronics |
|
|
154,873 |
|
|
|
31.3 |
|
|
|
186,663 |
|
|
|
30.1 |
|
|
|
214,271 |
|
|
|
31.7 |
|
Track |
|
|
84,803 |
|
|
|
17.2 |
|
|
|
99,184 |
|
|
|
16.0 |
|
|
|
94,395 |
|
|
|
13.9 |
|
Delivery |
|
|
7,605 |
|
|
|
1.5 |
|
|
|
9,931 |
|
|
|
1.6 |
|
|
|
11,380 |
|
|
|
1.7 |
|
Lawn and garden |
|
|
14,272 |
|
|
|
2.9 |
|
|
|
17,567 |
|
|
|
2.8 |
|
|
|
16,741 |
|
|
|
2.5 |
|
Bedding |
|
|
10,240 |
|
|
|
2.1 |
|
|
|
13,120 |
|
|
|
2.1 |
|
|
|
17,721 |
|
|
|
2.6 |
|
Furniture |
|
|
7,207 |
|
|
|
1.5 |
|
|
|
15,320 |
|
|
|
2.5 |
|
|
|
33,357 |
|
|
|
4.9 |
|
Other |
|
|
4,016 |
|
|
|
0.8 |
|
|
|
4,798 |
|
|
|
0.8 |
|
|
|
5,131 |
|
|
|
0.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total product sales |
|
|
451,560 |
|
|
|
91.4 |
|
|
|
569,877 |
|
|
|
91.8 |
|
|
|
623,959 |
|
|
|
92.2 |
|
Service maintenance agreement
commissions |
|
|
23,950 |
|
|
|
4.8 |
|
|
|
30,583 |
|
|
|
4.9 |
|
|
|
30,567 |
|
|
|
4.5 |
|
Service revenues |
|
|
18,725 |
|
|
|
3.8 |
|
|
|
20,278 |
|
|
|
3.3 |
|
|
|
22,411 |
|
|
|
3.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total net sales |
|
$ |
494,235 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
$ |
620,738 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
$ |
676,937 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Within these major product categories (excluding service maintenance agreements, service
revenues and delivery and installation), we offer our customers over 2,500 SKUs in a wide range of
price points. Most of these products are manufactured by brand name companies, including General
Electric, Whirlpool, Frigidaire, Maytag, LG, Mitsubishi, Samsung, Sony, Toshiba, Hitachi, Apple,
Serta, Ashley, Lane, Hewlett Packard, Compaq, Poulan, Husqvarna and Toro. As part of our
good-better-best merchandising strategy, our customers are able to choose from products ranging
from low-end to mid- to high-end models in each of our key product categories, as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Category |
|
Products |
|
Selected Brands |
|
|
|
|
|
Major appliances
|
|
Refrigerators,
freezers, washers,
dryers, ranges,
dishwashers, air
conditioners and
vacuum cleaners
|
|
General
Electric,
Frigidaire,
Whirlpool, Maytag,
LG, KitchenAid,
Sharp, Friedrich,
Roper, Hoover and
Eureka |
|
|
|
|
|
Consumer electronics
|
|
Projection,
plasma, LCD and DLP
televisions, and
home theater
systems
|
|
Sony, Samsung,
Mitsubishi, LG,
Toshiba, Hitachi,
Yamaha and Bose |
|
|
|
|
|
Track
|
|
Computers,
computer
peripherals,
camcorders, digital
cameras, DVD
players, audio
components, compact
disc players,
speakers and
portable
electronics (e.g.
iPods)
|
|
Hewlett
Packard, Compaq,
Sony, Apple and
Yamaha |
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
Lawn and
garden, furniture
and mattresses
|
|
Poulan,
Husqvarna, Toro,
Rally, Weedeater,
Ashley, Lane,
Franklin and Serta |
8
Purchasing. We purchase products from over 100 manufacturers and distributors. Our
agreements with these manufacturers and distributors typically cover a one or two year time period,
are renewable at the option of the parties and are terminable upon 30 days written notice by either
party. Similar to other specialty retailers, we purchase a significant portion of our total
inventory from a limited number of vendors. During fiscal 2007, 57.2% of our total inventory
purchases were from six vendors, including 12.9%, 12.7% and 12.1% of our total inventory from
Frigidaire, Samsung and Whirlpool, respectively. The loss of any one or more of these key vendors
or our failure to establish and maintain relationships with these and other vendors could have a
material adverse effect on our results of operations and financial condition. We have no
indication that any of our suppliers will discontinue selling us merchandise. We have not
experienced significant difficulty in maintaining adequate sources of merchandise, and we generally
expect that adequate sources of merchandise will continue to exist for the types of products we
sell.
Merchandising Strategy. We focus on providing a comprehensive selection of
high-quality merchandise to appeal to a broad range of potential customers. Consistent with our
good-better-best merchandising strategy, we offer a wide range of product selections from
entry-level models through high-end models. We primarily sell brand name warranted merchandise. Our
established relationships with major appliance and electronic vendors and our affiliation with
NATM, a major buying group, give us purchasing power that allows us to offer custom-featured
appliances and electronics and provides us a competitive selling advantage over other independent
retailers. We test the sale of all new products and obtain customers reactions to new display
formats before introducing these products and display formats to all of our stores. As part of our
merchandising strategy, we operate clearance centers, either as stand-alone units or incorporated
within one of our retail stores, in our Houston, San Antonio and Dallas markets to help sell
damaged, used or discontinued merchandise.
Pricing. We emphasize competitive pricing on all of our products and maintain a low
price guarantee that is valid in all markets for 10 to 30 days after the sale, depending on the
product. At most of our stores, to print an invoice that contains pricing other than the price
maintained within our computer system, sales personnel must call a special hotline number at the
corporate office for approval. Personnel staffing this hotline number are familiar with competitor
pricing and are authorized to make price adjustments to fulfill our low price guarantee when a
customer presents acceptable proof of the competitors lower price. This centralized function also
allows us to maintain control of pricing and to store and retrieve pricing data of our competitors.
Customer Service
We focus on customer service as a key component of our strategy. We believe our next day
delivery option, which is not offered by most of our competitors, is one of the keys to our
success. Additionally, we attempt to answer and resolve all customer complaints within 48 hours of
receipt. We track customer complaints by individual salesperson, delivery person and service
technician. We send out over 38,000 customer satisfaction survey cards each month covering all
deliveries and service calls. Based upon a response rate from our customers of approximately 15%,
we consistently report an average customer satisfaction level of approximately 91%.
9
Store Operations
Stores. At the end of fiscal 2007 we operated 62 retail and clearance stores located
in Texas and Louisiana. The following table illustrates our markets, the number of freestanding and
strip mall stores in each market and the calendar year in which we opened our first store in each
market:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of Stores |
|
First |
|
|
Stand |
|
Strip |
|
Store |
Market |
|
Alone |
|
Mall |
|
Opened |
Houston |
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
1983 |
|
San Antonio/Austin |
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
1994 |
|
Golden Triangle (Beaumont, Port Arthur and Orange, Texas
and Lake Charles, Louisiana) |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
1937 |
|
Baton rougel/Lafayette |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
1975 |
|
Corpus Christi |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
2002 |
|
Dallas/Fort Worth |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
2003 |
|
South Texas |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
2004 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
46 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Our stores have an average selling space of approximately 21,700 square feet, plus a rear
storage area averaging approximately 5,500 square feet for fast-moving or smaller products that
customers prefer to carry out rather than wait for in-home delivery. Three of our stores are
clearance centers for discontinued product models and damaged merchandise, returns and repossessed
product located in our Houston and Dallas markets and contain 48,800 square feet of combined
selling space. All stores are open from 10:00 a.m. to 9:30 p.m. Monday through Friday, from 9:00
a.m. to 9:30 p.m. on Saturday, and from 11:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m. on Sunday. We also offer extended
store hours during the holiday selling season.
Approximately 74% of our stores are located in strip shopping centers and regional malls,
with the balance being stand-alone buildings in power centers of big box consumer retail stores.
All of our locations have parking available immediately adjacent to the stores front entrance. Our
storefronts have a distinctive front that guides the customer to the entrance of the store. Inside
the store, a large colorful tile track circles the interior floor of the store. One side of the
track leads the customer to major appliances, while the other side of the track leads the customer
to a large display of television and projection television products. The inside of the track
contains various home office and consumer electronic products such as computers, printers, DVD
players, camcorders, digital cameras and MP3 players. Mattresses, furniture and lawn and garden
equipment displays occupy the rear of the sales floor. To reach the cashiers desk at the center of
the track area, our customers must walk past our products. We believe this increases sales to
customers who have purchased products from us on credit in the past and who return to our stores to
make their monthly credit payments.
We have updated most of our stores in the last three years. We expect to continue to
update our stores as needed to address each stores specific needs. All of our updated stores, as
well as our new stores, include modern interior selling spaces featuring attractive signage and
display areas specifically designed for each major product type. Our prototype store for future
expansion has from 25,000 to 30,000 square feet of retail selling space, which is approximately 20%
more than the average size of our existing stores and a rear storage area of between 5,000 and
7,000 square feet. Our investment to update our stores has averaged approximately $170,000 per
store over the past three years, and as a result of the updating, we expect to increase same store
sales at those stores. Over the last three years, we have invested approximately $7.7 million
updating, refurbishing or relocating our existing stores.
Site Selection. Our stores are typically located adjacent to freeways or major travel
arteries and in the vicinity of major retail shopping areas. We prefer to locate our stores in
areas where our prominent storefront will be the anchor of the shopping center or readily visible
from major thoroughfares. We also attempt to locate our stores in the vicinity of major home
appliance and electronics superstores. We have typically entered major metropolitan markets where
we can potentially support at least 10 to 12 stores. We believe this number of stores allows us to
optimize advertising and distribution costs. We have and may continue to elect to experiment with
opening lower numbers of new stores in smaller communities where customer demand for products and
services outweighs any extra cost. Other factors we consider when
10
evaluating potential markets
include the distance from our distribution centers, our existing store locations and store
locations of our competitors and population, demographics and growth potential of the market.
Store Economics. We lease 55 of our 62 current store locations, with an average
monthly rent of $19,400. Our average per store investment for the 9 new leased stores we have
opened in the last two years was approximately $1.6 million, including leasehold improvements,
fixtures and equipment and inventory (net of accounts payable). Our total investment for the three
locations that were purchased or built in the last two years averaged approximately $4.4 million,
including land, buildings, fixtures and equipment and inventory (net of accounts payable). For
these new stores, excluding the clearance center, the net sales per store have averaged $0.7
million per month.
Our new stores have typically been profitable on an operating basis within their first
three to six months of operation and, on average have returned our net cash investment in 20 months
or less. We consider a new store to be successful if it achieves $8 million to $9 million in sales
volume and 2% to 5% in operating margins before other ancillary revenues and allocations of
overhead and advertising in the first full year of operation. We expect successful stores that have
matured, which generally occurs after two to three years of operations, to generate annual sales of
approximately $12 million to $15 million and 5% to 9% in operating margins before other ancillary
revenues and overhead and allocations. However, depending on the credit and insurance penetration
of an individual store, we believe that a store that does not achieve these levels of sales can
still contribute significantly to our pretax margin.
Personnel and Compensation. We staff a typical store with a store manager, an
assistant manager, an average of 20 sales personnel and other support staff including cashiers
and/or porters based on store size and location. Managers have an average tenure with us of
approximately seven years and typically have prior sales floor experience. In addition to store
managers, we have seven district managers that generally oversee from seven to ten stores in each
market. Our district managers generally have five to fifteen years of sales experience and report
to our senior vice president of sales, who has over twenty years of sales experience.
We compensate our sales associates on a straight commission arrangement, while we
generally compensate store managers on a salary basis plus incentives and cashiers at an hourly
rate. In some instances, store managers receive earned commissions plus base salary. We believe
that because our store compensation plans are tied to sales, they generally provide us an advantage
in attracting and retaining highly motivated employees.
Training. New sales personnel must complete an intensive two week classroom training
program conducted at our corporate office. We then require them to spend an additional week riding
in delivery and service trucks to gain an understanding of how we serve our customers after the
sale is made. Installation and delivery staff and service personnel receive training through an
on-the-job program in which individuals are assigned to an experienced installation and delivery or
service employee as helpers prior to working alone. In addition, our employees benefit from on-site
training conducted by many of our vendors.
We attempt to identify store manager candidates early in their careers with us and place
them in a defined program of training. They generally first attend our in-house training program,
which provides guidance and direction for the development of managerial and supervisory skills.
They then attend a Dale Carnegie certified management course that helps solidify their management
knowledge and builds upon their internal training. After completion of these training programs,
manager candidates work as assistant managers for six
to twelve months and are then allowed to manage one of our smaller stores, where they are
supervised closely by the stores district manager. We give new managers an opportunity to operate
larger stores as they become more proficient in their management skills. Each store manager attends
mandatory training sessions on a monthly basis and also attends bi-weekly sales training meetings
where participants receive and discuss new product information.
Marketing
We design our marketing and advertising programs to increase our brand name recognition,
educate consumers about our products and services and generate customer traffic in order to
increase sales. Our programs include periodic promotions such as three, six, twelve, eighteen,
twenty-four or thirty-six months of no interest financing. We conduct our advertising programs
primarily through local newspapers, local radio and television stations and direct marketing
through direct mail, telephone and our website.
11
Direct marketing has become an effective way for us to present our products and services
to our existing customers and potential new customers. We use direct mail to target promotional
mailings to credit worthy individuals, including new residents in our market areas from time to
time. In addition, we use direct mail to market increased credit lines to existing customers, to
encourage customers using third party credit to convert to our credit programs and for customer
appreciation mailings. We also conduct a mail program to reestablish contact with customers who
applied for credit recently at one of our stores but did not purchase a product. Additionally, we
call customers who recently applied for credit at one of our retail locations but did not purchase
a product; this often redirects potential purchasers back into the original store location.
Our website, www.conns.com, provides customers the ability to purchase our products
on-line, offers information about our selection of products and provides useful information to the
consumer on pricing, features and benefits for each product, in addition to required corporate
governance information. Our website also allows the customers residing in the markets in which we
operate retail locations to apply and be considered for credit and see our special on-line
promotional items. The website currently averages approximately 6,670 visits per day from potential
and existing customers and during fiscal 2007, was the source of approximately 120,920 credit
applications. The website is linked to a call center, allowing us to better assist customers with
their credit and product needs.
Distribution and Inventory Management
We typically locate our stores in close proximity of our five regional distribution
centers located in Houston, San Antonio, Dallas and Beaumont, Texas and Lafayette, Louisiana and
smaller cross-dock facilities in Austin and Harlingen, Texas. This enables us to deliver products
to our customers quickly, reduces inventory requirements at the individual stores and facilitates
regionalized inventory and accounting controls.
In our retail stores, we maintain an inventory of fast-moving items and products that the
customer is likely to carry out of the store. Our sophisticated Distribution Inventory Sales
computer system and the use of scanning technology in our distribution centers allow us to
determine, on a real-time basis, the exact location of any product we sell. If we do not have a
product at the desired retail store at the time of sale, we can provide it through our distribution
system on a next day basis.
We maintain a fleet of tractors and trailers that allow us to move products from market
to market and from distribution centers to stores. Our fleet of home delivery vehicles enables our
highly-trained delivery and installation specialists to quickly complete the sales process,
enhancing customer service. We receive a delivery fee based on their choice of delivery.
Additionally, we are able to complete deliveries to our customers on the day after the sale for
approximately 94% of our customers who have scheduled delivery during that timeframe.
Finance Operations
General. We sell our products for cash or for payment through major credit cards,
which we treat as cash sales. We also offer our customers several financing alternatives through
our proprietary credit programs. In the last three fiscal years, we financed, on average,
approximately 58% of our retail sales through one of our two credit programs. We offer our
customers a choice of installment payment plans and revolving credit plans
through our primary credit portfolio. We also offer an installment program through our
secondary credit portfolio to a limited number of customers who do not qualify for credit under our
primary credit portfolio. The following table shows our product and service maintenance agreements
sales, net of returns and allowances, by method of payment for the periods indicated.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended January 31, |
|
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
Amount |
|
|
% |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
% |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
% |
|
Cash and other credit cards |
|
$ |
193,753 |
|
|
|
40.8 |
% |
|
$ |
254,047 |
|
|
|
42.3 |
% |
|
$ |
274,533 |
|
|
|
42.0 |
% |
Primary credit portfolio: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Installment |
|
|
225,369 |
|
|
|
47.4 |
|
|
|
263,667 |
|
|
|
43.9 |
|
|
|
262,653 |
|
|
|
40.1 |
|
Revolving |
|
|
20,663 |
|
|
|
4.3 |
|
|
|
30,697 |
|
|
|
5.1 |
|
|
|
43,225 |
|
|
|
6.6 |
|
Secondary credit portfolio |
|
|
35,725 |
|
|
|
7.5 |
|
|
|
52,049 |
|
|
|
8.7 |
|
|
|
74,115 |
|
|
|
11.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
475,510 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
$ |
600,460 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
$ |
654,526 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12
Credit Approval. Our credit programs are operated by our centralized credit department
staff, independent of sales personnel. As part of our centralized credit approval process, we have
developed a proprietary standardized scoring model that provides preliminary credit decisions,
including down payment amounts and credit terms, based on both customer and product risk. We
developed this model with data analysis by Equifax® to correlate the product
category of a customer purchase with the default probability. We reported, in connection with the
bond offering completed by our QSPE in August 2006, that the weighted average credit score of the
receivables included in the sold portfolio was 604, excluding accounts that had no credit score.
Although we rely on this program to approve automatically some credit applications from customers,
approximately 91% of our credit decisions are based on evaluation of the customers
creditworthiness by a qualified credit grader. As of January 31, 2007, we employed approximately
500 full-time and part-time employees who focus on credit approval, collections and credit customer
service. These employees are trained to follow our strict methodology in approving credit,
collecting our accounts, and charging off any uncollectible accounts based on pre-determined aging
criteria.
A significant part of our ability to control delinquency and net charge-off is based on
the level of down payments that we require and the purchase money security interest that we obtain
in the product financed, which reduce our credit risk and increase our customers ability and
willingness to meet their future obligations. We require the customer to purchase or provide proof
of credit property insurance coverage to offset potential losses relating to theft or damage of the
product financed.
Installment accounts are paid over a specified period of time with set monthly payments.
Revolving accounts provide customers with a specified amount which the customer may borrow, repay
and re-borrow so long as the credit limit is not exceeded. Most of our installment accounts provide
for payment over 12 to 36 months, and for those accounts paid in full during fiscal 2007, the
average account was outstanding for approximately 12 to 14 months. Our revolving accounts were
outstanding approximately 13 to 15 months for those accounts paid in full during fiscal 2007.
During fiscal 2007, approximately 18% of the applications approved under the primary program were
handled automatically through our computer system based on the customers credit history. The
remaining applications, of both new and repeat customers, are sent to an experienced in-house
credit grader.
We created our secondary credit portfolio program to meet the needs of those customers
who do not qualify for credit under our primary program, typically due to past credit problems or
lack of credit history. If we cannot approve a customers application for credit under our primary
portfolio, we automatically send the application to the credit staff of our secondary portfolio for
further consideration, using stricter underwriting criteria. The additional requirements include
verification of employment and recent work history, reference checks and higher required down
payment levels. We offer only the installment program to those customers that qualify under these
stricter underwriting criteria. An experienced, in-house credit grader administers the credit
approval process for all applications received under our secondary portfolio program. Most of the
installment accounts approved under this program provide for repayment over 12 to 36 months, and
for those
accounts paid in full during fiscal 2007, the average account was outstanding for
approximately 18 to 20 months.
13
The following two tables present, for comparison purposes, information regarding our two
credit portfolios.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Primary Portfolio (1) |
|
|
Years Ended January 31, |
|
|
2005 |
|
2006 |
|
2007 |
|
|
(total outstanding balance in thousands) |
Total outstanding balance (period end) |
|
$ |
358,252 |
|
|
$ |
421,649 |
|
|
$ |
435,607 |
|
Average outstanding customer balance |
|
$ |
1,268 |
|
|
$ |
1,284 |
|
|
$ |
1,250 |
|
Number of active accounts (period end) |
|
|
282,533 |
|
|
|
328,402 |
|
|
|
348,593 |
|
Total applications processed (2) |
|
|
567,352 |
|
|
|
684,674 |
|
|
|
778,784 |
|
Percent of retail sales financed |
|
|
51.7 |
% |
|
|
49.0 |
% |
|
|
46.7 |
% |
Total applications approved |
|
|
56.4 |
% |
|
|
52.8 |
% |
|
|
45.8 |
% |
Average down payment |
|
|
7.4 |
% |
|
|
7.6 |
% |
|
|
10.6 |
% |
Average interest spread (3) |
|
|
12.7 |
% |
|
|
12.0 |
% |
|
|
11.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Secondary Portfolio |
|
|
Years Ended January 31, |
|
|
2005 |
|
2006 |
|
2007 |
|
|
(total outstanding balance in thousands) |
Total outstanding balance (period end) |
|
$ |
70,448 |
|
|
$ |
98,072 |
|
|
$ |
133,944 |
|
Average outstanding customer balance |
|
$ |
1,040 |
|
|
$ |
1,128 |
|
|
$ |
1,212 |
|
Number of active accounts (period end) |
|
|
67,718 |
|
|
|
86,936 |
|
|
|
110,472 |
|
Total applications processed (2) |
|
|
238,605 |
|
|
|
314,698 |
|
|
|
404,543 |
|
Percent of retail sales financed |
|
|
7.5 |
% |
|
|
8.7 |
% |
|
|
11.3 |
% |
Total applications approved |
|
|
33.3 |
% |
|
|
34.1 |
% |
|
|
32.1 |
% |
Average down payment |
|
|
27.2 |
% |
|
|
26.4 |
% |
|
|
25.1 |
% |
Average interest spread (3) |
|
|
14.0 |
% |
|
|
14.1 |
% |
|
|
13.5 |
% |
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The Primary Portfolio consists of owned and sold receivables. |
|
(2) |
|
Unapproved credit applications in the primary portfolio are automatically referred to the secondary portfolio. |
|
(3) |
|
Difference between the average interest rate yield on the portfolio and the average cost of funds under the
securitization program plus the allocated interest related to funds required to finance the credit
enhancement portion of the portfolio. Also reflects the loss of interest income resulting from interest free
promotional programs. |
Credit Quality. We enter into securitization transactions to sell our retail
receivables to a qualifying special purpose entity or QSPE, which we formed for this purpose. After
the sale, we continue to service these receivables under a contract with the QSPE. We closely
monitor these credit portfolios to identify delinquent accounts early and dedicate resources to
contacting customers concerning past due accounts. We believe that our local presence, ability to
work with customers and flexible financing alternatives contribute to the historically low net
charge-off rates on these portfolios. In addition, our customers have the opportunity to make their
monthly payments in our stores, and approximately 56% of our active credit accounts did so at some
time during the last 12 months. We believe that these factors help us maintain a relationship with
the customer that keeps losses low while encouraging repeat purchases.
Our follow-up collection activities involve a combination of efforts that take place in
our corporate office and two smaller collection centers located in Dallas and San Antonio, and
outside collection efforts that involve a visit by one of our credit counselors to the customers
home. We maintain a predictive dialer system and letter campaign that helps us contact between
25,000 and 30,000 delinquent customers daily. We also maintain an experienced skip-trace department
that utilizes current technology to locate customers who have moved and left no forwarding address.
Our outside collectors provide an on-site contact with the customer to assist in the collection
process or, if needed, to actually repossess the product in the event of non-payment. Repossessions
are made when it is clear that the customer is unwilling to establish a reasonable payment process.
Our legal department represents us in bankruptcy proceedings and filing of delinquency judgment
claims and helps handle any legal issues associated with the collection process.
Generally, we deem an account to be uncollectible and charge it off if the account is 120
days or more past due and we have not received a payment in the last seven months. Over the last 36
months, we have
14
recovered approximately 15% of charged-off amounts through our collection
activities. The income that we realize from our interest in securitized receivables depends on a
number of factors, including expected credit losses. Therefore, it is to our advantage to maintain
a low delinquency rate and loss ratio on these credit portfolios.
Our accounting and credit staff consistently monitor trends in charge-offs by examining
the various characteristics of the charge-offs, including store of origination, product type,
customer credit information, down payment amounts and other identifying information. We track our
charge-offs both gross, before recoveries, and net, after recoveries. We periodically adjust our
credit granting, collection and charge-off policies based on this information.
The following table reflects the performance of our two credit portfolios, net of
unearned interest.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Primary Portfolio (1) |
|
Secondary Portfolio |
|
|
Years Ended January 31, |
|
Years Ended January 31, |
|
|
2005 |
|
2006 |
|
2007 |
|
2005 |
|
2006 |
|
2007 |
|
|
(dollars in thousands) |
|
(dollars in thousands) |
Total outstanding balance (period end) |
|
$ |
358,252 |
|
|
$ |
421,649 |
|
|
$ |
435,607 |
|
|
$ |
70,448 |
|
|
$ |
98,072 |
|
|
$ |
133,944 |
|
Average total outstanding balance |
|
$ |
323,108 |
|
|
$ |
387,464 |
|
|
$ |
417,747 |
|
|
$ |
64,484 |
|
|
$ |
86,461 |
|
|
$ |
116,749 |
|
Account balances over 60 days old (period end) |
|
$ |
17,503 |
|
|
$ |
26,029 |
|
|
$ |
26,024 |
|
|
$ |
5,640 |
|
|
$ |
9,508 |
|
|
$ |
11,638 |
|
Percent of balances over 60 days old to total
outstanding (period end) (2) |
|
|
4.9 |
% |
|
|
6.2 |
% |
|
|
6.0 |
% |
|
|
8.0 |
% |
|
|
9.7 |
% |
|
|
8.7 |
% |
Bad debt write-offs (net of recoveries) |
|
$ |
7,601 |
|
|
$ |
9,852 |
|
|
$ |
13,507 |
|
|
$ |
1,604 |
|
|
$ |
1,915 |
|
|
$ |
3,896 |
|
Percent of write-offs (net) to average outstanding (3) |
|
|
2.4 |
% |
|
|
2.5 |
% |
|
|
3.2 |
% |
|
|
2.5 |
% |
|
|
2.2 |
% |
|
|
3.3 |
% |
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The Primary Portfolio consists of owned and sold receivables. |
|
(2) |
|
At January 31, 2006, the percent of balances over 60 days old was elevated due to the
impact of Hurricanes Katrina and Rita. See additional discussion in Managements Discussion
and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations. |
|
(3) |
|
The fiscal year ended January 31, 2005, includes the benefit of new information
received during the year, which impacted the realization of sales tax credits on prior year
write-offs. The fiscal year ended January 31, 2007, was impacted by the disruption to our
credit collection operations caused by Hurricane Rita. |
The following table presents information regarding the growth of our combined credit
portfolios, including unearned interest.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended January 31, |
|
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
(dollars in thousands) |
|
Beginning balance |
|
$ |
418,702 |
|
|
$ |
514,204 |
|
|
$ |
620,736 |
|
New receivables financed |
|
|
423,935 |
|
|
|
495,553 |
|
|
|
511,158 |
|
Revolving finance charges |
|
|
3,926 |
|
|
|
3,858 |
|
|
|
3,892 |
|
Returns on account |
|
|
(10,670 |
) |
|
|
(5,397 |
) |
|
|
(5,465 |
) |
Collections
on account |
|
|
(312,484 |
) |
|
|
(375,342 |
) |
|
|
(437,665 |
) |
Accounts charged off |
|
|
(11,825 |
) |
|
|
(14,392 |
) |
|
|
(19,538 |
) |
Recoveries of charge-offs |
|
|
2,620 |
|
|
|
2,252 |
|
|
|
2,135 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ending balance |
|
|
514,204 |
|
|
|
620,736 |
|
|
|
675,253 |
|
Less unearned interest at end of period |
|
|
(85,504 |
) |
|
|
(101,015 |
) |
|
|
(105,703 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total portfolio, net |
|
$ |
428,700 |
|
|
$ |
519,721 |
|
|
$ |
569,550 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Product Support Services
Credit Insurance. Acting as agents for unaffiliated insurance companies, we sell credit
life, credit disability, credit involuntary unemployment and credit property insurance at all of
our stores. These products cover payment of the customers credit account in the event of the
customers death, disability or involuntary unemployment or if the financed property is lost or
damaged. We receive sales commissions from the unaffiliated insurance company at the time we sell
the coverage, and we recognize retrospective commissions, which are additional commissions paid by
the insurance carrier if insurance claims are less than earned premiums, as such commissions are
actually earned.
15
We require proof of property insurance on all installment credit purchases, although we do not
require that customers purchase this insurance from us. During fiscal 2007, approximately 83.0% of
our credit customers purchased one or more of the credit insurance products we offer, and
approximately 22.9% purchased all of the insurance products we offer. Commission revenues from the
sale of credit insurance contracts represented approximately 2.8%, 2.4% and 2.4% of total revenues
for fiscal years 2005, 2006 and 2007, respectively.
Warranty Service. We provide warranty service for all of the products we sell and only
for the products we sell. Customers purchased service maintenance agreements on products
representing approximately 47.4% of our total retail sales for fiscal 2007. These agreements
broaden and extend the period of covered manufacturer warranty service for up to five years from
the date of purchase, depending on the product, and cover certain items during the manufacturers
warranty period. These agreements are sold at the time the product is purchased. Customers may
finance the cost of the agreements along with the purchase price of the associated product. We
contact the customer prior to the expiration of the service maintenance period to provide them the
opportunity to renew the period of warranty coverage.
We have contracts with unaffiliated third party insurers that issue the service
maintenance agreements to cover the costs of repairs performed by our service department under
these agreements. The initial service contract is between the customer and the independent
insurance company, but we are the insurance companys first choice to provide service when it is
needed. We receive a commission on the sale of the contract, and we bill the insurance company for
the cost of the service work that we perform. Commissions on these third party contracts are
recognized in revenues, net of the payment to the third party obligor. Renewal contracts are
between the customer and our in-house service department. Under renewal contracts we recognize
revenues received, and direct selling expenses incurred, over the life of the contracts, and
expense the cost of the service work performed as products are repaired.
Of the 16,000 to 22,000 repairs that we perform each month, approximately 27.3% are
covered under these service maintenance agreements, approximately 47.7% are covered by manufacturer
warranties and the remainder are walk-in repairs from our customers. Revenues from the sale of
service contracts represented approximately 4.8%, 4.9%, and 4.5% of net sales during fiscal years
2005, 2006 and 2007, respectively.
Management Information Systems
We have a fully integrated management information system that tracks, on a real-time
basis, point-of-sale information, inventory receipt and distribution, merchandise movement and
financial information. The management information system also includes a local area network that
connects all corporate users to e-mail, scheduling and various servers. All of our facilities are
linked by a wide-area network that provides communication for in-house credit authorization and
real-time capture of sales and merchandise movement at the store level. In our distribution
centers, we use wireless terminals to assist in receiving, stock put-away, stock movement, order
filling, cycle counting and inventory management. At our stores, we currently use desktop terminals
to assist in receiving, transferring and maintaining perpetual inventories.
Our integrated management information system also includes extensive functionality for
management of the complete credit portfolio life cycle as well as functionality for the management
of product service. The credit system continues from our in-house credit authorization through
account set up and tracking, credit portfolio condition, collections, credit employee productivity
metrics, skip-tracing, and bankruptcy, fraud and legal account management. The service system
provides for service order processing, warranty claims processing, parts inventory management,
technician scheduling and dispatch, technician performance metrics and customer satisfaction
measurement. All of these systems share a common customer and product sold database.
Our point of sale system uses an IBM Series i5 hardware system that runs on the i5OS
operating system. This system enables us to use a variety of readily available applications in
conjunction with software that supports the system. All of our current business application
software, except our accounting, human resources and credit legal systems, has been developed
in-house by our management information system
employees. We believe our management information systems efficiently support our current
operations and provide a foundation for future growth.
16
We employ a Nortel telephone switch and state of the art Avaya (formerly Mosaix)
predictive dialer, as well as a redundant data network and cable plant, to improve the efficiency
of our collection and overall corporate communication efforts.
As part of our ongoing system availability protection and disaster recovery planning, we
have implemented a secondary IBM Series i5 system. We installed and implemented a back-up IBM
Series i5 system in our corporate offices to provide the ability to switch production processing
from the primary system to the secondary system within thirty minutes should the primary system
become disabled or unreachable. The two machines are kept synchronized utilizing third party
software. This backup system provides high availability of the production processing environment.
The primary IBM Series i5 system is geographically removed from our corporate office for purposes
of disaster recovery and security. These systems worked as designed during our evacuation from our
corporate headquarters in Beaumont, Texas, due to Hurricane Rita in September 2005. While we were
displaced, our store, distribution and service operations that were not impacted by the hurricane
continued to have normal system availability and functionality.
Competition
According to Twice, total industry manufacturer sales of home appliances and consumer
electronics products in the United States, including imports, to the top 100 dealers were estimated
to be $22.8 billion and $108.2 billion, respectively, in 2005. The retail home appliance market is
large and concentrated among a few major suppliers. Sears has historically been the leader in the
retail home appliance market, with a market share among the top 100 retailers of approximately 39%
in both 2004 and 2005. The consumer electronics market is highly fragmented. We estimate that the
two largest consumer electronics superstore chains accounted for approximately 32% of the total
electronics sales attributable to the 100 largest retailers in 2005. However, new entrants in both
industries have been successful in gaining market share by offering similar product selections at
lower prices.
As reported by Twice, based upon revenue in 2005, we were the 9th largest retailer of
home appliances and the 37th largest retailer of consumer electronics. Our competitors
include national mass merchants such as Sears and Wal-Mart, specialized national retailers such as
Circuit City and Best Buy, home improvement stores such as Lowes and Home Depot, and locally-owned
regional or independent retail specialty stores. The availability and convenience of the Internet
is increasing as a competitive factor in our industry.
We compete primarily based on enhanced customer service through our unique sales force
training and product knowledge, next day delivery capabilities, proprietary in-house credit
program, guaranteed low prices and product repair service.
Regulation
The extension of credit to consumers is a highly regulated area of our business. Numerous
federal and state laws impose disclosure and other requirements on the origination, servicing and
enforcement of credit accounts. These laws include, but are not limited to, the Federal Truth in
Lending Act, Equal Credit Opportunity Act and Federal Trade Commission Act. State laws impose
limitations on the maximum amount of finance charges that we can charge and also impose other
restrictions on consumer creditors, such as us, including restrictions on collection and
enforcement. We routinely review our contracts and procedures to ensure compliance with applicable
consumer credit laws. Failure on our part to comply with applicable laws could expose us to
substantial penalties and claims for damages and, in certain circumstances, may require us to
refund finance charges already paid and to forego finance charges not yet paid under non-complying
contracts. We believe that we are in substantial compliance with all applicable federal and state
consumer credit and collection laws.
Our sale of credit life, credit disability, credit involuntary unemployment and credit
property insurance products is also highly regulated. State laws currently impose disclosure
obligations with respect to our sales of credit and other insurance products similar to those
required by the Federal Truth in Lending Act, impose restrictions on the amount of premiums that we
may charge and require licensing of certain of our employees
and operating entities. We believe we are in substantial compliance with all applicable laws
and regulations relating to our credit insurance business.
17
Employees
As of January 31, 2007, we had approximately 2,850 full-time employees and 100 part-time
employees, of which approximately 1,400 were sales personnel. We provide a comprehensive benefits
package including health, life, long term disability, and dental insurance coverage as well as a
401(k) plan, employee stock purchase plan, paid vacation, sick pay and holiday pay. None of our
employees are covered by collective bargaining agreements and we believe our employee relations are
good. Conns has formal dispute resolution plan that requires mandatory arbitration for employment
related issues. The plan covers all applicants, employees and former employees who left Conns on
or after March 1, 2006.
Tradenames and Trademarks
We have registered the trademarks Conns and our logos.
Available Information
We are subject to reporting requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, or the
Exchange Act, and its rules and regulations. The Exchange Act requires us to file reports, proxy
and other information statements and other information with the Securities and Exchange Commission
(SEC). Copies of these reports, proxy statements and other information can be inspected and copied
at the SEC Public Reference Room, 450 Fifth Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20549. You may obtain
information on the operation of the Public Reference Room by calling the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330.
You may also obtain these materials electronically by accessing the SECs home page on the internet
at www.sec.gov.
Our board has adopted a code of business conduct and ethics for our employees, a code of
ethics for our chief executive officer and senior financial professionals and a code of business
conduct and ethics for our board of directors. A copy of these codes are published on our website
at www.conns.com under Investor Relations. We intend to make all required disclosures concerning
any amendments to, waivers from, these codes on our website. In addition, we make available, free
of charge on our internet website, our Annual Report on Form 10-K, Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q,
Current Reports on Form 8-K, and amendments to these reports filed or furnished pursuant to Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act as soon as reasonably practicable after we electronically file
this material with, or furnish it to, the SEC. You may review these documents, under the heading
Conns Investor Relations, by accessing our website at www.conns.com. Also, reports and other
information concerning us are available for inspection and copying at NASDAQ Capital Markets.
ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS.
An investment in our common stock involves risks and uncertainties. You should consider
carefully the following information about these risks and uncertainties before buying shares of our
common stock. The occurrence of any of the risks described below could adversely affect our
business, financial condition or results of operations. In that case, the trading price of our
stock could decline, and you could lose all or part of the value of your investment.
Our success depends substantially on our ability to open and operate profitably new stores in
existing, adjacent and new geographic markets.
We plan to continue our expansion by opening an additional six to eight new stores in fiscal
2008. We anticipate these new stores to include additional stores in the Dallas/Fort Worth
Metroplex, San Antonio, South Texas, where we currently have two stores, and possibly others in
areas where we have not operated previously. We have not yet selected sites for all of the stores
that we plan to open within the next fiscal year. We may not be able to open all of these stores,
and any new stores that we open may not be profitable or meet our goals. Any of these
circumstances could have a material adverse effect on our financial results.
18
There are a number of factors that could affect our ability to open and operate new stores
consistent with our business plan, including:
|
|
|
competition in existing, adjacent and new markets; |
|
|
|
|
competitive conditions, consumer tastes and discretionary spending patterns in
adjacent and new markets that are different from those in our existing markets; |
|
|
|
|
a lack of consumer demand for our products at levels that can support new store
growth; |
|
|
|
|
inability to make customer financing programs available that allow consumer to
purchase products at levels that can support new store growth; |
|
|
|
|
limitations created by covenants and conditions under our credit facilities and our
asset-backed securitization program; |
|
|
|
|
the availability of additional financial resources; |
|
|
|
|
the substantial outlay of financial resources required to open new stores and the
possibility that we may recognize little or no related benefit; |
|
|
|
|
an inability or unwillingness of vendors to supply product on a timely basis at competitive prices; |
|
|
|
|
the failure to open enough stores in new markets to achieve a sufficient market presence; |
|
|
|
|
the inability to identify suitable sites and to negotiate acceptable leases for these sites; |
|
|
|
|
unfamiliarity with local real estate markets and demographics in adjacent and new markets; |
|
|
|
|
problems in adapting our distribution and other operational and management systems
to an expanded network of stores; |
|
|
|
|
difficulties associated with the hiring, training and retention of additional
skilled personnel, including store managers; and |
|
|
|
|
higher costs for print, radio and television advertising. |
These factors may also affect the ability of any newly opened stores to achieve sales and
profitability levels comparable with our existing stores or to become profitable at all.
If we are unable to manage our growing business, our revenues may not increase as anticipated, our
cost of operations may rise and our profitability may decline.
We face many business risks associated with growing companies, including the risk that our
management, financial controls and information systems will be inadequate to support our planned
expansion. Our growth plans will require management to expend significant time and effort and
additional resources to ensure the continuing adequacy of our financial controls, operating
procedures, information systems, product purchasing, warehousing and distribution systems and
employee training programs. We cannot predict whether we will be able to manage effectively these
increased demands or respond on a timely basis to the changing demands that our planned expansion
will impose on our management, financial controls and information systems. If we fail to manage
successfully the challenges our growth poses, do not continue to improve these systems and controls
or encounter unexpected difficulties during our expansion, our business, financial condition,
operating results or cash flows could be materially adversely affected.
19
The inability to obtain funding for our credit operations through securitization facilities or
other sources may adversely affect our business and expansion plans.
We finance most of our customer receivables through asset-backed securitization facilities.
The trust arrangement governing these facilities currently provides for three separate series of
asset-backed notes that allowed us, as of January 31, 2007, to borrow up to $610 million to finance
customer receivables. Under each note series, we transfer customer receivables to a qualifying
special purpose entity we formed for this purpose, in exchange for cash, subordinated securities
and the right to receive cash flows equal to the interest rate spread between the transferred
receivables and the notes issued to third parties (interest-only strip). This qualifying special
purpose entity, in turn, issues notes collateralized by these receivables that entitle the holders
of the notes to participate in certain cash flows from these receivables. The 2002 Series A
program is a $300 million variable funding note held by Three Pillars Funding Corporation, of which
$128.0 million was drawn as of January 31, 2007. The 2002 Series A program consists of a $100
million 364-day tranche and a $200 million tranche that matures in August 2011. The 2002 Series B
program consists of $160 million in private bond placements that began scheduled principal payments
in October 2006. The 2006 Series A program consists of $150 million in private bond placements that
will require scheduled principal payments beginning in September 2010.
Our ability to raise additional capital through further securitization transactions, and to do
so on economically favorable terms, depends in large part on factors that are beyond our control.
These factors include:
|
|
|
conditions in the securities and finance markets generally; |
|
|
|
|
conditions in the markets for securitized instruments; |
|
|
|
|
the credit quality and performance of our customer receivables; |
|
|
|
|
our ability to obtain financial support for required credit enhancement; |
|
|
|
|
our ability to adequately service our financial instruments; |
|
|
|
|
the absence of any material downgrading or withdrawal of ratings given to our
securities previously issued in securitizations; and |
|
|
|
|
prevailing interest rates. |
Our ability to finance customer receivables under our current asset-backed securitization
facilities depends on our compliance with covenants relating to our business and our customer
receivables. If these programs reach their capacity or otherwise become unavailable, and we are
unable to arrange substitute securitization facilities or other sources of financing, we may have
to limit the amount of credit that we make available through our customer finance programs. This
may adversely affect revenues and results of operations. Further, our inability to obtain funding
through securitization facilities or other sources may adversely affect the profitability of
outstanding accounts under our credit programs if existing customers fail to repay outstanding
credit due to our refusal to grant additional credit. Since our cost of funds under our bank
credit facility is expected to be greater in future years than our cost of funds under our current
securitization facility, increased reliance on our bank credit facility may adversely affect our
net income.
An increase in interest rates may adversely affect our profitability.
The interest rates on our bank credit facility and the 2002 Series A program under our
asset-backed securitization facility fluctuate up or down based upon the LIBO/LIBOR rate, the prime
rate of our administrative agent or the federal funds rate in the case of the bank credit facility
and the commercial paper rate in the case of the 2002 Series A program. To the extent that such
rates increase, the fair value of the interest-only strip will decline and our interest expense
could increase which may result in a decrease in our profitability.
20
We have significant future capital needs which we may be unable to fund, and we may need additional
funding sooner than currently anticipated.
We will need substantial capital to finance our expansion plans, including funds for capital
expenditures, pre-opening costs and initial operating losses related to new store openings. We may
not be able to obtain additional financing on acceptable terms. If adequate funds are not
available, we will have to curtail projected growth, which could materially adversely affect our
business, financial condition, operating results or cash flows.
We estimate that capital expenditures during fiscal 2008 will be approximately $20 million to
$25 million and that capital expenditures during future years may exceed this amount. We expect
that cash provided by operating activities, available borrowings under our credit facility, and
access to the unfunded portion of our asset-backed securitization program will be sufficient to
fund our operations, store expansion and updating activities and capital expenditure programs
through at least January 31, 2008. However, this may not be the case. We may be required to seek
additional capital earlier than anticipated if future cash flows from operations fail to meet our
expectations and costs or capital expenditures related to new store openings exceed anticipated
amounts.
A decrease in our credit sales or a decline in credit quality could lead to a decrease in our
product sales and profitability.
In the last three years, we financed, on average, approximately 58% of our retail sales
through our internal credit programs. Our ability to provide credit as a financing alternative for
our customers depends on many factors, including the quality of our accounts receivable portfolio.
Payments on some of our credit accounts become delinquent from time to time, and some accounts end
up in default, due to several factors, including general and local economic conditions. As we
expand into new markets, we will obtain new credit accounts that may present a higher risk than our
existing credit accounts since new credit customers do not have an established credit history with
us. A general decline in the quality of our accounts receivable portfolio could lead to a
reduction of available credit provided through our finance operations. As a result, we might sell
fewer products, which could adversely affect our earnings. Further, because approximately 56% of
our credit customers make their credit account payments in our stores, any decrease in credit sales
could reduce traffic in our stores and lower our revenues. A decline in the credit quality of our
credit accounts could also cause an increase in our credit losses, which could result in a decrease
in our securitization income or increase the provision for bad debts on our statement of operations
and result in an adverse effect on our earnings. A decline in credit quality could also lead to
stricter underwriting criteria which might have a negative impact on sales.
A downturn in the economy may affect consumer purchases of discretionary items, which could reduce
our net sales.
A large portion of our sales represent discretionary spending by our customers. Many factors
affect discretionary spending, including regional or world events, war, conditions in financial
markets, general business conditions, interest rates, inflation, energy and gasoline prices,
consumer debt levels, the availability of consumer credit, taxation, unemployment trends and other
matters that influence consumer confidence and spending. Our customers purchases of discretionary
items, including our products, could decline during periods when disposable income is lower or
periods of actual or perceived unfavorable economic conditions. If this occurs, our net sales and
profitability could decline.
We face significant competition from national, regional and local retailers of major home
appliances and consumer electronics.
The retail market for major home appliances and consumer electronics is highly fragmented and
intensely competitive. We currently compete against a diverse group of retailers, including
national mass merchants such as Sears, Wal-Mart, Target, Sams Club and Costco, specialized
national retailers such as Circuit City and Best Buy, home improvement stores such as Lowes and
Home Depot, and locally-owned regional or independent retail specialty stores that sell major home
appliances and consumer electronics similar, and often identical, to those we sell. We also
compete with retailers that market products through
21
store catalogs and the
Internet. In addition, there are few barriers to entry into our current and contemplated
markets, and new competitors may enter our current or future markets at any time.
We may not be able to compete successfully against existing and future competitors. Some of
our competitors have financial resources that are substantially greater than ours and may be able
to purchase inventory at lower costs and better sustain economic downturns. Our competitors may
respond more quickly to new or emerging technologies and may have greater resources to devote to
promotion and sale of products and services. If two or more competitors consolidate their
businesses or enter into strategic partnerships, they may be able to compete more effectively
against us.
Our existing competitors or new entrants into our industry may use a number of different
strategies to compete against us, including:
|
|
|
expansion by our existing competitors or entry by new competitors into markets where
we currently operate; |
|
|
|
|
lower pricing; |
|
|
|
|
aggressive advertising and marketing; |
|
|
|
|
extension of credit to customers on terms more favorable than we offer; |
|
|
|
|
larger store size, which may result in greater operational efficiencies, or
innovative store formats; and |
|
|
|
|
adoption of improved retail sales methods. |
Competition from any of these sources could cause us to lose market share, revenues and
customers, increase expenditures or reduce prices, any of which could have a material adverse
effect on our results of operations.
If new products are not introduced or consumers do not accept new products, our sales may decline.
Our ability to maintain and increase revenues depends to a large extent on the periodic
introduction and availability of new products and technologies. We believe that the introduction
and continued growth in consumer acceptance of new products, such as digital video recorders and
digital, high-definition televisions, will have a significant impact on our ability to increase
revenues. These products are subject to significant technological changes and pricing limitations
and are subject to the actions and cooperation of third parties, such as movie distributors and
television and radio broadcasters, all of which could affect the success of these and other new
consumer electronics technologies. It is possible that new products will never achieve widespread
consumer acceptance.
If we fail to anticipate changes in consumer preferences, our sales may decline.
Our products must appeal to a broad range of consumers whose preferences cannot be predicted
with certainty and are subject to change. Our success depends upon our ability to anticipate and
respond in a timely manner to trends in consumer preferences relating to major household appliances
and consumer electronics. If we fail to identify and respond to these changes, our sales of these
products may decline. In addition, we often make commitments to purchase products from our vendors
up to six months in advance of proposed delivery dates. Significant deviation from the projected
demand for products that we sell may have a material adverse effect on our results of operations
and financial condition, either from lost sales or lower margins due to the need to reduce prices
to dispose of excess inventory.
A disruption in our relationships with, or in the operations of, any of our key suppliers could
cause our sales to decline.
The success of our business and growth strategies depends to a significant degree on our
relationships with our suppliers, particularly our brand name suppliers such as General Electric,
Whirlpool, Frigidaire,
Maytag, LG, Mitsubishi, Samsung, Sony, Toshiba, Hitachi, Apple, Serta, Ashley, Lane, Hewlett
Packard, Compaq, Poulan, Husqvarna and Toro. We do not have long term supply agreements or
exclusive
22
arrangements with the majority of our vendors. We typically order our inventory through
the issuance of individual purchase orders to vendors. We also rely on our suppliers for
cooperative advertising support. We may be subject to rationing by suppliers with respect to a
number of limited distribution items. In addition, we rely heavily on a relatively small number of
suppliers. Our top six suppliers represented 57.2% of our purchases for fiscal 2007, and the top
two suppliers represented approximately 25.6% of our total purchases. The loss of any one or more
of these key vendors or our failure to establish and maintain relationships with these and other
vendors could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations and financial condition.
Our ability to enter new markets successfully depends, to a significant extent, on the
willingness and ability of our vendors to supply merchandise to additional warehouses or stores. If
vendors are unwilling or unable to supply some or all of their products to us at acceptable prices
in one or more markets, our results of operations and financial condition could be materially
adversely affected.
Furthermore, we rely on credit from vendors to purchase our products. As of January 31, 2007,
we had $54.0 million in accounts payable and $87.1 million in merchandise inventories. A
substantial change in credit terms from vendors or vendors willingness to extend credit to us
would reduce our ability to obtain the merchandise that we sell, which could have a material
adverse effect on our sales and results of operations.
You should not rely on our comparable store sales as an indication of our future results of
operations because they fluctuate significantly.
Our historical same store sales growth figures have fluctuated significantly from quarter to
quarter. For example, same store sales growth for each of the quarters of fiscal 2007 were 16.1%,
7.2%, -3.7%, and
-2.0%, respectively. A number of factors have historically affected, and will continue to
affect, our comparable store sales results, including:
|
|
|
changes in competition; |
|
|
|
|
general economic conditions; |
|
|
|
|
new product introductions; |
|
|
|
|
consumer trends; |
|
|
|
|
changes in our merchandise mix; |
|
|
|
|
changes in the relative sales price points of our major product categories; |
|
|
|
|
ability to offer credit programs attractive to our customers; |
|
|
|
|
the impact of our new stores on our existing stores, including potential decreases
in existing stores sales as a result of opening new stores; |
|
|
|
|
weather conditions in our markets; |
|
|
|
|
timing of promotional events; |
|
|
|
|
timing and location of major sporting events; and |
|
|
|
|
our ability to execute our business strategy effectively. |
Changes in our quarterly and annual comparable store sales results could cause the price of
our common stock to fluctuate significantly.
23
Because we experience seasonal fluctuations in our sales, our quarterly results will fluctuate,
which could adversely affect our common stock price.
We experience seasonal fluctuations in our net sales and operating results. In fiscal 2007, we
generated 28.0% of our net sales and 31.4% of our net income in the fiscal quarter ended January 31
(which included the holiday selling season). We also incur significant additional expenses during
this fiscal quarter due to higher purchase volumes and increased staffing. If we miscalculate the
demand for our products generally or for our product mix during the fiscal quarter ending January
31, our net sales could decline, resulting in excess inventory or increased sales discounts to sell
excess inventory, which could harm our financial performance. A shortfall in expected net sales,
combined with our significant additional expenses during this fiscal quarter, could cause a
significant decline in our operating results. This could adversely affect our common stock price.
Our business could be adversely affected by changes in consumer protection laws and regulations.
Federal and state consumer protection laws and regulations, such as the Fair Credit Reporting
Act, limit the manner in which we may offer and extend credit. Since we finance a substantial
portion of our sales, any adverse change in the regulation of consumer credit could adversely
affect our total revenues and gross margins. For example, new laws or regulations could limit the
amount of interest or fees that may be charged on consumer credit accounts or restrict our ability
to collect on account balances, which would have a material adverse effect on our earnings. During
2005, new bankruptcy laws went into effect that impacted our customers ability to file for
bankruptcy. Historically, we had been relatively effective in pursuing our position as a secured
creditor of bankrupt borrowers and obtaining payments on the related accounts and contracts.
However, at this time we cannot be certain what long term impact these changes will have on our
delinquency or loss experience. Compliance with existing and future laws or regulations could
require us to make material expenditures, in particular personnel training costs, or otherwise
adversely affect our business or financial results. Failure to comply with these laws or
regulations, even if inadvertent, could result in negative publicity, fines or additional licensing
expenses, any of which could have an adverse effect on our results of operations and stock price.
Pending litigation relating to the sale of credit insurance and the sale of service maintenance
agreements in the retail industry could adversely affect our business.
We understand that states attorneys general and private plaintiffs have filed lawsuits
against other retailers relating to improper practices conducted in connection with the sale of
credit insurance in several jurisdictions around the country. We offer credit insurance in all of
our stores and require the purchase of property credit insurance products from us or from third
party providers in connection with sales of merchandise on installment credit; therefore, similar
litigation could be brought against us. We were previously named as a defendant in a purported
class action lawsuit alleging breach of contract and violations of state and federal consumer
protection laws arising from the terms of our service maintenance agreements. A final judgment was
entered dismissing that lawsuit. While we believe we are in full compliance with applicable laws
and regulations, if we are found liable in any future lawsuit regarding credit insurance or service
maintenance agreements, we could be required to pay substantial damages or incur substantial costs
as part of an out-of-court settlement, either of which could have a material adverse effect on our
results of operations and stock price. An adverse judgment or any negative publicity associated
with our service maintenance agreements or any potential credit insurance litigation could also
affect our reputation, which could have a negative impact on sales.
If we lose key management or are unable to attract and retain the qualified sales and credit
granting and collection personnel required for our business, our operating results could suffer.
Our future success depends to a significant degree on the skills, experience and continued
service of Thomas J. Frank, Sr., age 67, our Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer,
William C. Nylin, Jr., 64, our Executive Vice Chairman and Chief Operating Officer, Timothy L.
Frank, 39, our President, David L. Rogers, 58, our Chief Financial Officer and David R. Atnip, 59,
our Senior Vice President and Treasurer, and other key personnel or the identification of suitable
successors for them. If we lose the services of any of these individuals, or if one or more of
them or other key personnel decide to join a competitor or otherwise compete
directly or indirectly with us, and we are unable to identify a suitable successor, our
business and
24
operations could be harmed, and we could have difficulty in implementing our strategy.
In addition, as our business grows, we will need to locate, hire and retain additional qualified
sales personnel in a timely manner and develop, train and manage an increasing number of management
level sales associates and other employees. Additionally, if we are unable to attract and retain
qualified credit granting and collection personnel, our ability to perform quality underwriting of
new credit transactions or maintain workloads for our collections personnel at a manageable level,
our operations could be adversely impacted and result in higher delinquency and net charge-offs on
our credit portfolio. Competition for qualified employees could require us to pay higher wages to
attract a sufficient number of employees, and increases in the federal minimum wage or other
employee benefits costs could increase our operating expenses. If we are unable to attract and
retain personnel as needed in the future, our net sales growth and operating results could suffer.
Because our stores are located in Texas and Louisiana, we are subject to regional risks.
Our 62 stores are located exclusively in Texas and Louisiana. This subjects us to regional
risks, such as the economy, weather conditions, hurricanes and other natural disasters. If the
region suffered an economic downturn or other adverse regional event, there could be an adverse
impact on our net sales and profitability and our ability to implement our planned expansion
program. Several of our competitors operate stores across the United States and thus are not as
vulnerable to the risks of operating in one region.
Our information technology infrastructure is vulnerable to damage that could harm our business.
Our ability to operate our business from day to day, in particular our ability to manage our
credit operations and inventory levels, largely depends on the efficient operation of our computer
hardware and software systems. We use management information systems to track inventory
information at the store level, communicate customer information, aggregate daily sales information
and manage our credit portfolio. These systems and our operations are vulnerable to damage or
interruption from:
|
|
|
power loss, computer systems failures and Internet, telecommunications or data
network failures; |
|
|
|
|
operator negligence or improper operation by, or supervision of, employees; |
|
|
|
|
physical and electronic loss of data or security breaches, misappropriation and similar events; |
|
|
|
|
computer viruses; |
|
|
|
|
intentional acts of vandalism and similar events; and |
|
|
|
|
hurricanes, fires, floods and other natural disasters. |
The software that we have developed to use in granting credit may contain undetected errors
that could cause our network to fail or our expenses to increase. Any failure due to any of these
causes, if it is not supported by our disaster recovery plan, could cause an interruption in our
operations and result in reduced net sales and profitability.
If we are unable to maintain our current insurance coverage for our service maintenance agreements,
our customers could incur additional costs and our repair expenses could increase, which could
adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations.
There are a limited number of insurance carriers that provide coverage for our service
maintenance agreements. If insurance becomes unavailable from our current carriers for any reason,
we may be unable to provide replacement coverage on the same terms, if at all. Even if we are able
to obtain replacement coverage, higher premiums could have an adverse impact on our profitability
if we are unable to pass along the increased cost of such coverage to our customers. Inability to
obtain insurance coverage for our service maintenance agreements could cause fluctuations in our
repair expenses and greater volatility of earnings.
25
If we are unable to maintain group credit insurance policies from insurance carriers, which allow
us to offer their credit insurance products to our customers purchasing on credit, our revenues
could be reduced and bad debts might increase.
There are a limited number of insurance carriers that provide credit insurance coverage for
sale to our customers. If credit insurance becomes unavailable for any reason we may be unable to
offer replacement coverage on the same terms, if at all. Even if we are able to obtain replacement
coverage, it may be at higher rates or reduced coverage, which could affect the customer acceptance
of these products, reduce our revenues or increase our credit losses.
Changes in trade regulations, currency fluctuations and other factors beyond our control could
affect our business.
A significant portion of our inventory is manufactured overseas and in Mexico. Changes in
trade regulations, currency fluctuations or other factors beyond our control may increase the cost
of items we purchase or create shortages of these items, which in turn could have a material
adverse effect on our results of operations and financial condition. Conversely, significant
reductions in the cost of these items in U.S. dollars may cause a significant reduction in the
retail prices of those products, resulting in a material adverse effect on our sales, margins or
competitive position. In addition, commissions earned on both our credit insurance and service
maintenance agreement products could be adversely affected by changes in statutory premium rates,
commission rates, adverse claims experience and other factors.
We may be unable to protect our intellectual property rights, which could impair our name and
reputation.
We believe that our success and ability to compete depends in part on consumer identification
of the name Conns. We have registered the trademarks Conns and our logo. We intend to
protect vigorously our trademark against infringement or misappropriation by others. A third
party, however, could attempt to misappropriate our intellectual property in the future. The
enforcement of our proprietary rights through litigation could result in substantial costs to us
that could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition or results of operations.
Any changes in the tax laws of the states of Texas and Louisiana could affect our state tax
liabilities.
As we experienced in fiscal year 2007 with the change in the Texas tax law, legislation could
be introduced at any time that changes our state tax liabilities in a way that has an adverse
impact on our results of operations. The new Texas margin tax was in effect for only eight months
during fiscal year 2007 and resulted in increased provision for income taxes of $0.5 million.
A further rise in oil and gasoline prices could affect our customers determination to drive to our
stores, and cause us to raise our delivery charges.
A further significant increase in oil and gasoline prices could adversely affect our
customers shopping decisions and patterns. We rely heavily on our internal distribution system
and our next day delivery policy to satisfy our customers needs and desires, and any such
significant increases could result in increased distribution charges. Such increases may not
significantly affect our competitors.
ITEM 1B. UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS.
None.
26
ITEM 2. PROPERTIES.
The following summarizes the geographic location of our stores, warehouse and distribution
centers and corporate facilities by major market area:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Leases |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
With |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expiring |
|
|
No. of |
|
Leased |
|
Total |
|
Storage |
|
Beyond |
Geographic Location |
|
Locations |
|
Facilities |
|
Square Feet |
|
Square Feet |
|
10 Years |
Golden Triangle District (1) |
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
157,129 |
|
|
|
30,456 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
Louisiana District |
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
148,628 |
|
|
|
38,394 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
Houston District |
|
|
21 |
|
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
508,477 |
|
|
|
84,370 |
|
|
|
14 |
|
San Antonio/Austin District |
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
418,637 |
|
|
|
82,849 |
|
|
|
13 |
|
Corpus Christi |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
61,864 |
|
|
|
18,960 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
South Texas |
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
61,247 |
|
|
|
10,034 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
Dallas District |
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
413,829 |
|
|
|
73,445 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Store Totals |
|
|
62 |
|
|
|
55 |
|
|
|
1,769,811 |
|
|
|
338,508 |
|
|
|
52 |
|
Warehouse/Distribution Centers |
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
703,453 |
|
|
|
703,453 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
Service Centers |
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
191,932 |
|
|
|
133,636 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
Corporate Offices |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
106,783 |
|
|
|
25,000 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
74 |
|
|
|
62 |
|
|
|
2,771,979 |
|
|
|
1,200,597 |
|
|
|
55 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Includes one store in Lake Charles, Louisiana. |
ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS.
We are involved in routine litigation incidental to our business from time to time. We do not
expect the outcome of any of this routine litigation to have a material effect on our financial
condition or results of operation. However, the results of their proceedings cannot be predicted
with certainty, and changes in facts and circumstances could impact our estimate of reserves for
litigation.
ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS.
There were no matters submitted to a vote of security holders during the fourth quarter of
fiscal 2007.
27
PART II
ITEM 5. MARKET FOR REGISTRANTS COMMON EQUITY, AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES
OF EQUITY SECURITIES.
What is the principal market for our common stock?
The principal market for our common stock is the NASDAQ Global Select Market. Our common
stock is listed on the NASDAQ Global Select Market under the symbol CONN. Information regarding
the high and low sales prices for our common stock for each quarterly period within the two most
recent fiscal years as reported on NASDAQ is summarized as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
High |
|
Low |
Quarter ended April 30, 2005 |
|
$ |
19.70 |
|
|
$ |
15.29 |
|
Quarter ended July 31, 2005 |
|
$ |
27.51 |
|
|
$ |
16.69 |
|
Quarter ended October 31, 2005 |
|
$ |
29.80 |
|
|
$ |
23.20 |
|
Quarter ended January 31, 2006 |
|
$ |
44.93 |
|
|
$ |
28.68 |
|
Quarter ended April 30, 2006 |
|
$ |
44.99 |
|
|
$ |
31.81 |
|
Quarter ended July 31, 2006 |
|
$ |
35.52 |
|
|
$ |
24.02 |
|
Quarter ended October 31, 2006 |
|
$ |
26.75 |
|
|
$ |
17.61 |
|
Quarter ended January 31, 2007 |
|
$ |
25.33 |
|
|
$ |
21.00 |
|
How many common stockholders do we have?
As of March 15, 2007, we had approximately 57 common stockholders of record and an estimated
8,700 beneficial owners of our common stock.
Did we declare any cash dividends in fiscal 2006 or fiscal 2007?
No cash dividends were paid in fiscal 2006 or 2007. We do not anticipate paying dividends in
the foreseeable future. Any future payment of dividends will be at the discretion of the Board of
Directors and will depend upon our results of operations, financial condition, cash requirements
and other factors deemed relevant by the Board of Directors, including the terms of our
indebtedness. Provisions in agreements governing our long-term indebtedness restrict the amount of
dividends that we may pay to our stockholders. See Item 7. Managements Discussion and Analysis
of Financial Condition and Results of Operations Liquidity and Capital Resources.
Has the Company had any sales of unregistered securities during the last year?
The Company has had no sales of unregistered securities during fiscal 2007.
28
Has the Company purchased any of its securities during the past quarter?
On August 25, 2006, we announced that our Board of Directors had authorized a common stock
repurchase program, permitting us to purchase, from time to time, in the open market and in
privately negotiated transactions, up to an aggregate of $50.0 million of our common stock,
dependent on market conditions and the price of the stock. During the quarter ended January 31,
2007, we effected the following repurchases of our common stock:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total # of Shares |
|
|
Approximate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchased as |
|
|
Dollar Value of |
|
|
|
Total # of |
|
|
Average |
|
|
Part of Publicly |
|
|
Shares That May |
|
|
|
shares |
|
|
Price Paid |
|
|
Announced |
|
|
Yet Be Purchased |
|
Period |
|
purchased |
|
|
per share |
|
|
Programs |
|
|
Under the Programs |
|
November 1 - November 30, 2006 |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
49,316,778 |
|
December 1 - December 31, 2006 |
|
|
69,000 |
|
|
$ |
23.14 |
|
|
|
69,000 |
|
|
$ |
47,720,033 |
|
January 1 - January 31, 2007 |
|
|
65,200 |
|
|
$ |
23.13 |
|
|
|
65,200 |
|
|
$ |
46,212,130 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
134,200 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
134,200 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
29
ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended January 31, |
|
|
|
2003 |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Statement of Operations: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues |
|
$ |
445,267 |
|
|
$ |
498,378 |
|
|
$ |
565,821 |
|
|
$ |
701,148 |
|
|
$ |
760,657 |
|
Operating expense: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of goods sold, including warehousing and
occupancy cost |
|
|
276,956 |
|
|
|
317,712 |
|
|
|
359,710 |
|
|
|
453,374 |
|
|
|
502,135 |
|
Selling, general and administrative expense |
|
|
125,717 |
|
|
|
135,457 |
|
|
|
153,526 |
|
|
|
182,728 |
|
|
|
195,908 |
|
Provision for bad debts |
|
|
1,779 |
|
|
|
2,504 |
|
|
|
2,589 |
|
|
|
1,133 |
|
|
|
1,476 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expense |
|
|
404,452 |
|
|
|
455,673 |
|
|
|
515,825 |
|
|
|
637,235 |
|
|
|
699,519 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income |
|
|
40,815 |
|
|
|
42,705 |
|
|
|
49,996 |
|
|
|
63,913 |
|
|
|
61,138 |
|
Interest (income) expense, net and minority interest |
|
|
7,237 |
|
|
|
4,577 |
|
|
|
2,477 |
|
|
|
400 |
|
|
|
(676 |
) |
Other (income) expense |
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
|
(175 |
) |
|
|
126 |
|
|
|
69 |
|
|
|
(772 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings before income taxes |
|
|
33,583 |
|
|
|
38,303 |
|
|
|
47,393 |
|
|
|
63,444 |
|
|
|
62,586 |
|
Provision for income taxes |
|
|
11,919 |
|
|
|
13,260 |
|
|
|
16,706 |
|
|
|
22,341 |
|
|
|
22,275 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
|
21,664 |
|
|
|
25,043 |
|
|
|
30,687 |
|
|
|
41,103 |
|
|
|
40,311 |
|
Less preferred stock dividends (1) |
|
|
(2,133 |
) |
|
|
(1,954 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income available for
common stockholders |
|
$ |
19,531 |
|
|
$ |
23,089 |
|
|
$ |
30,687 |
|
|
$ |
41,103 |
|
|
$ |
40,311 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings per common share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
$ |
1.17 |
|
|
$ |
1.30 |
|
|
$ |
1.32 |
|
|
$ |
1.76 |
|
|
$ |
1.70 |
|
Diluted |
|
$ |
1.17 |
|
|
$ |
1.26 |
|
|
$ |
1.30 |
|
|
$ |
1.71 |
|
|
$ |
1.66 |
|
Average common shares outstanding: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
|
16,724 |
|
|
|
17,726 |
|
|
|
23,192 |
|
|
|
23,412 |
|
|
|
23,663 |
|
Diluted |
|
|
16,724 |
|
|
|
18,257 |
|
|
|
23,646 |
|
|
|
24,088 |
|
|
|
24,289 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other Financial Data: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stores open at end of period |
|
|
42 |
|
|
|
45 |
|
|
|
50 |
|
|
|
56 |
|
|
|
62 |
|
Same store sales growth (2) |
|
|
1.3 |
% |
|
|
2.6 |
% |
|
|
3.6 |
% |
|
|
16.9 |
% |
|
|
3.6 |
% |
Inventory turns (3) |
|
|
6.6 |
|
|
|
6.5 |
|
|
|
6.0 |
|
|
|
6.6 |
|
|
|
6.1 |
|
Gross margin percentage (4) |
|
|
37.8 |
% |
|
|
36.3 |
% |
|
|
36.4 |
% |
|
|
35.3 |
% |
|
|
34.0 |
% |
Operating margin (5) |
|
|
9.2 |
% |
|
|
8.6 |
% |
|
|
8.8 |
% |
|
|
9.1 |
% |
|
|
8.0 |
% |
Return on average equity (6) |
|
|
28.1 |
% |
|
|
19.4 |
% |
|
|
16.1 |
% |
|
|
17.7 |
% |
|
|
14.7 |
% |
Capital expenditures |
|
$ |
15,070 |
|
|
$ |
9,401 |
|
|
$ |
19,619 |
|
|
$ |
18,490 |
|
|
$ |
18,425 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance Sheet Data: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Working capital |
|
$ |
74,139 |
|
|
$ |
121,154 |
|
|
$ |
156,006 |
|
|
$ |
190,073 |
|
|
$ |
220,740 |
|
Total assets |
|
|
185,663 |
|
|
|
240,081 |
|
|
|
276,716 |
|
|
|
355,617 |
|
|
|
389,947 |
|
Total debt |
|
|
51,992 |
|
|
|
14,512 |
|
|
|
10,532 |
|
|
|
136 |
|
|
|
198 |
|
Preferred stock |
|
|
15,226 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity |
|
|
86,824 |
|
|
|
171,911 |
|
|
|
208,734 |
|
|
|
255,861 |
|
|
|
292,528 |
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Dividends were not actually declared or paid until 2004, but are presented for purposes
of earnings per share calculations. |
|
(2) |
|
Same store sales growth is calculated by comparing the reported sales by store for all
stores that were open throughout a period to reported sales by store for all stores that
were open throughout the prior period. Sales from closed stores have been removed from
each period. Sales from relocated stores have been included in each period because each
such store was relocated within the same general geographic market. Sales from expanded
stores have been included in each period. |
|
(3) |
|
Inventory turns are defined as the cost of goods sold, excluding warehousing and
occupancy cost, divided by the average of the beginning and ending product inventory,
excluding consigned goods. |
|
(4) |
|
Gross margin percentage is defined as total revenues less cost of goods and parts sold,
including warehousing and occupancy cost, divided by total revenues. |
|
(5) |
|
Operating margin is defined as operating income divided by total revenues. |
|
(6) |
|
Return on average equity is calculated as current period net income divided by the
average of the beginning and ending equity. |
30
ITEM 7. MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS.
(Restated)
Forward-Looking Statements
This report contains forward-looking statements. We sometimes use words such as believe,
may, will, estimate, continue, anticipate, intend, expect, project and similar
expressions, as they relate to us, our management and our industry, to identify forward-looking
statements. Forward-looking statements relate to our expectations, beliefs, plans, strategies,
prospects, future performance, anticipated trends and other future events. We have based our
forward-looking statements largely on our current expectations and projections about future events
and financial trends affecting our business. Actual results may differ materially. Some of the
risks, uncertainties and assumptions about us that may cause actual results to differ from these
forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to:
|
|
|
the success of our growth strategy and plans regarding opening new stores and
entering adjacent and new markets, including our plans to continue expanding into the
Dallas/Fort Worth Metroplex, and South Texas; |
|
|
|
|
our intention to update or expand existing stores; |
|
|
|
|
our ability to obtain capital for required capital expenditures and costs related to
the opening of new stores or to update or expand existing stores; |
|
|
|
|
our cash flows from operations, borrowings from our revolving line of credit and
proceeds from securitizations to fund our operations, debt repayment and expansion; |
|
|
|
|
the ability of the QSPE to obtain additional funding for the purpose of purchasing
our receivables; |
|
|
|
|
the effect of rising interest rates that could increase our cost of borrowing or
reduce securitization income; |
|
|
|
|
the potential for deterioration in the delinquency status of the sold or owned
credit portfolios or higher than historical net charge-offs in the portfolios could
adversely impact earnings; |
|
|
|
|
the long-term effect of the change in bankruptcy laws could effect net charge-offs
in the credit portfolio which could adversely impact earnings; |
|
|
|
|
technological and market developments, growth trends and projected sales in the home
appliance and consumer electronics industry, including with respect to digital products
like DVD players, HDTV, digital radio, home networking devices and other new products,
and our ability to capitalize on such growth; |
|
|
|
|
the potential for price erosion or lower unit sales points that could result in
declines in revenues; |
|
|
|
|
higher oil and gas prices could adversely affect our customers shopping decisions
and patterns, as well as the cost of our delivery and service operations and our cost
of products, if vendors pass on their additional fuel costs through increased pricing
for products; |
|
|
|
|
the ability to attract and retain qualified personnel; |
|
|
|
|
both short-term and long-term impact of adverse weather conditions (e.g. hurricanes)
that could result in volatility in our revenues and increased expenses and casualty
losses; |
|
|
|
|
changes in laws and regulations and/or interest, premium and commission rates
allowed by regulators on our credit, credit insurance and service maintenance
agreements as allowed by those laws and regulations; |
31
|
|
|
our relationships with key suppliers; |
|
|
|
|
the adequacy of our distribution and information systems and management experience
to support our expansion plans; |
|
|
|
|
the accuracy of our expectations regarding competition and our competitive advantages; |
|
|
|
|
the potential for market share erosion that could result in reduced revenues; |
|
|
|
|
the accuracy of our expectations regarding the similarity or dissimilarity of our
existing markets as compared to new markets we enter; and |
|
|
|
|
the outcome of litigation affecting our business. |
Additional important factors that could cause our actual results to differ materially from our
expectations are discussed under Risk Factors in this Form 10-K. In light of these risks,
uncertainties and assumptions, the forward-looking events and circumstances discussed in this
report might not happen.
The forward-looking statements in this report reflect our views and assumptions only as of the
date of this report. We undertake no obligation to update publicly or revise any forward-looking
statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise, except as required
by law.
All forward-looking statements attributable to us, or to persons acting on our behalf, are
expressly qualified in their entirety by these cautionary statements.
General
We intend the following discussion and analysis to provide you with a better
understanding of our financial condition and performance in the indicated periods, including an
analysis of those key factors that contributed to our financial condition and performance and that
are, or are expected to be, the key drivers of our business.
Through our 62 retail stores, we provide products and services to our customers in six primary
market areas, including Houston, San Antonio/Austin, Dallas/Fort Worth, southern Louisiana,
Southeast Texas, and South Texas. Products and services offered through retail sales outlets
include major home appliances, consumer electronics, home office equipment, lawn and garden
products, mattresses, furniture, service maintenance agreements, customer credit programs,
including installment and revolving credit account services, and various credit insurance products.
These activities are supported through our extensive service, warehouse and distribution system.
Our stores bear the Conns name, after our founders family, and deliver the same products and
services to our customers. All of our stores follow the same procedures and methods in managing
their operations. The Companys management evaluates performance and allocates resources based on
the operating results of the retail stores and considers the credit programs, service contracts and
distribution system to be an integral part of the Companys retail operations.
32
Presented below is a diagram setting forth our five cornerstones which represent, in our view,
the five components of our sales goal strong merchandising systems, state of the art credit
options for our customers, an extensive warehousing and distribution system, a service system to
support our customers needs during and beyond the product warranty periods, and our uniquely,
well-trained employees in each area. Each of these systems combine to create a nuts and bolts
support system for our customers needs and desires. Each of these systems is discussed at length
in the Business section of this report.
We, of course, derive a large part of our revenue from our product sales. However, unlike many of
our competitors, we provide in-house credit options for our customers product purchases. In the
last three years, we have financed, on average, approximately 58% of our retail sales through these
programs. In turn, we finance (convert to cash) substantially all of our customer receivables from
these credit options through an asset-backed securitization facility. See Business Finance
Operations for a detailed discussion of our in-house credit programs. As part of our asset-backed
securitization facility, we have created a qualifying special purpose entity, which we refer to as
the QSPE or the issuer, to purchase customer receivables from us and to issue asset-backed and
variable funding notes to third parties to fund such purchases. We transfer our receivables,
consisting of retail installment contracts and revolving accounts extended to our customers, to the
issuer in exchange for cash and subordinated securities.
While our warehouse and distribution system does not directly generate revenues, other
than the fees paid by our customers for delivery and installation of the products to their homes,
it is our extra, value-added program that our existing customers have come to rely on, and our
new customers are hopefully sufficiently impressed with to become repeat customers. We derive
revenues from our repair services on the products we sell. Additionally, acting as an agent for
unaffiliated companies, we sell credit insurance to protect our customers from credit losses due to
death, disability, involuntary unemployment and damage to the products they have purchased; to the
extent they do not already have it.
Executive Overview
This overview is intended to provide an executive level overview of our operations for our
fiscal year ended January 31, 2007. A detailed explanation of the changes in our operations for
the fiscal year ended January 31, 2007 as compared to the prior year is included beginning under
Results of Operations. Following are significant financial items in managements view:
|
|
|
Our revenues for the fiscal year ended January 31, 2007, increased by 8.5 percent, or
$59.5 million, from fiscal year 2006 to $760.6 million due to sales growth primarily from
product sales and service maintenance agreement commissions. Our same store sales growth
rate for the fiscal year ended January 31, 2007 was 3.6%, versus 16.9% for fiscal 2006. The
lower same store sales growth rate was due primarily to the positive impact on fiscal 2006
sales due to Hurricanes Katrina and Rita. (Also see Operational Changes and Outlook.) |
33
|
|
|
During the last half of fiscal year 2006, two hurricanes, Katrina and Rita, hit the Gulf
Coast. These storms significantly impacted our operations by: |
|
§ |
|
temporary closing of our Louisiana, Southeast Texas, Corpus Christi and
Houston stores and related distribution operations for limited periods of
time, |
|
|
§ |
|
positively impacting Net sales as customers in the affected
areas replaced appliances and other household products damaged as a result of the
storms, |
|
|
§ |
|
disrupting credit collection efforts while we were displaced from our
corporate headquarters as a result of Hurricane Rita, causing a temporary
increase in the credit portfolios delinquency and net charge-off statistics
and resulting in a reduction of Finance charges and other and an increase in
Bad debt expense, and |
|
|
§ |
|
causing us to incur expenses related to the relocation of our corporate
office functions and losses related to damaged merchandise and facilities,
net of insurance proceeds. |
|
|
|
Same store sales in fiscal year 2006 benefited from the effects of the hurricanes.
Appliance sales accounted for the majority of the increase in total same stores sales
during the period due in part to our customers need to replace items damaged by the
storms. We believe same store sales, adjusted for our estimate of the impact of the
hurricanes, grew approximately 12% for the year ended January 31, 2006. As a result, same
store sales in fiscal year 2007 were negatively impacted because of the comparison to the
very strong prior year sales. |
|
|
|
|
Our entry into the Dallas/Fort Worth and the South Texas markets and the addition of
stores in our existing Houston and San Antonio markets had a positive impact on our
revenues. We achieved approximately $35.2 million of increases in product sales and
service maintenance agreement (SMA) commissions for the year ended January 31, 2007 from
the opening of twelve new stores in these markets since February 2005. Our plans provide
for the opening of six to eight additional stores, primarily in existing markets, during
the balance of fiscal 2008 as we focus on opportunities in markets in which we have
existing infrastructure . |
|
|
|
|
While deferred interest and same as cash plans continue to be an important part
of our sales promotion plans, our improved execution and effective use of a variety of
sales promotions, enabled us to reduce the level of deferred interest and same as cash
plans, relative to product and SMA sales volume, from 26.6% in fiscal year 2006 to 25.1% in
fiscal year 2007. We offer promotional credit with terms ranging from three months to 36
months. Any promotional credit with terms in excess of 12 months is considered extended
term. While the use of promotional credit as a percentage of product and SMA sales
declined in total, sales financed by extended term deferred interest and same as cash
plans increased from $33.9 million, or 5.6% of product and SMA sales, for the year ended
January 31, 2006, to $59.0 million, or 9.0%, for the year ended January 31, 2007. We expect
to continue to offer extended term promotional credit in the future. |
|
|
|
|
During the year ended January 31, 2006, pretax income was reduced by $1.0 million to
reflect our estimate of expected losses due to the impact of Hurricane Rita on our credit
collection operations and a temporary increase in bankruptcy filings. The increase in
bankruptcy filings is as a result of the new bankruptcy law that took effect October 17,
2005, prompting consumers to file for bankruptcy protection before the new law went into
effect. The $1.0 million charge to earnings consisted of an $895,000 impairment charge
recorded related to Interests in securitized assets and increased Bad debt expense of
$105,000. During the year ended January 31, 2007, we recorded a $1.5 million impairment
charge related to our Interests in securitized assets to reflect our estimate of
anticipated higher credit losses as a result of the continued impact of Hurricane Rita on
our credit collection operations. |
|
|
|
|
Our gross margin was 34.0% for fiscal year 2007, a decrease from 35.3% in fiscal 2006,
primarily as a result of reduced gross margin realized on product sales from 21.4% in the
year ended January |
34
|
|
|
31, 2006, to 20.6% in fiscal year 2007, reduced securitization income,
because of higher net charge-offs in the credit portfolio, and reduced retrospective SMA
commissions. |
|
|
|
|
Our operating margin decreased to 8.0% from 9.1% in fiscal 2006 as a result of the lower
gross margin achieved. In fiscal year 2007, we decreased SG&A expense as a percent of
revenues to 25.8% from 26.1% when compared to the prior year, primarily from decreases in
payroll and payroll related expenses and net advertising expense as a percent of revenues. |
|
|
|
|
Operating cash flows were $28.7 million for fiscal 2007. Our operating cash flows
decreased as a result of the timing of payments that had been deferred in the prior fiscal
year due to Hurricanes Katrina and Rita. |
|
|
|
|
Our pretax income for fiscal 2007 decreased by 1.4% or approximately $0.9 million, from
fiscal 2006 to $62.6 million. The decrease was driven largely by decreased operating
margins due to lower gross margin. |
|
|
|
|
We adopted SFAS No. 123R, Share-Based Payment, during the year ended January 31, 2007,
using the modified retrospective application transition method, which results in the
retrospective adjustment of all prior periods. The adoption resulted in expenses totaling
$1.7 million being
recorded to SG&A during the year ended January 31, 2007 as compared to $1.2 million being
recorded in the year ended January 31, 2006. |
|
|
|
|
During the year ended January 31, 2007, the Company completed the sale of a building and
the related land, resulting in the recognition of a gain of $0.7 million, which is
reflected in Other (income) expense. |
Operational Changes and Outlook
We have implemented, continued increased focus on, or modified several initiatives in
fiscal 2007 that we believe will positively impact our future operating results, including:
|
|
|
Increased emphasis on the sales of furniture, and additional product lines added to
this category; and |
|
|
|
|
Increased promotion of flat panel technology in our stores as the price point becomes
more affordable for our customers. |
Our sales during the last five months of fiscal 2006 and first five months of fiscal 2007
benefited from the impact of Hurricanes Katrina and Rita. This impact could affect future same
store sales due to:
|
|
|
The acceleration of the sale of essential appliances in the affected markets disrupting
the normal replacement cycle for these items; and |
|
|
|
|
The same store sales reported for the impacted markets being elevated to a level that
might not be duplicated. |
The credit portfolio delinquency and charge-off statistics were negatively impacted by the
effects of Hurricane Rita that hit the Gulf Coast during September of 2005. The hurricane impacted
our customers ability to pay on their accounts and hampered our credit collection operations,
including payment processing delays caused by disruption in the mail service. The credit collection
operations were negatively affected by the loss of personnel, as some employees did not return to
work, and by the increase in the number of delinquent accounts, resulting in increased workloads
for the personnel that returned to work. To address the staffing issues, we intensified our
recruiting efforts to attract individuals to our Beaumont, Texas collection center and opened a
second collection center in Dallas, Texas. Non-storm factors that may have negatively affected
delinquencies and charge-offs include the impact of the bankruptcy law change in October 2005 and
other economic factors on our customers. The delinquency performance of the credit portfolio has
improved since January 31, 2006, and the loss rates have returned to historical levels.
35
On May 18, 2006, the Governor of Texas signed a tax bill that modifies the existing franchise
tax, with the most significant change being the replacement of the existing base with a tax based
on margin. Taxable margin is generally defined as total federal tax revenues minus the greater of
(a) cost of goods sold or (b) compensation. The tax rate to be paid by retailers and wholesalers is
0.5% on taxable margin. This will result in an increase in taxes paid by us, as franchise taxes
paid have totaled less than $50,000 per year for the last several years. The tax changes impacted
earnings beginning in the quarter ended July 31, 2006. For the year ended January 31, 2007, we
accrued, net of federal tax benefit, approximately $0.5 million in additional tax liability and
initially recorded approximately $29,000 in net deferred tax assets as a result of the new margin
tax. Going forward, we expect our effective tax rate on Income before income taxes to increase to
between 36% and 37%, from the 35.1% we experienced prior to the initiation of the new tax.
During the year, we opened three new stores in the Houston market, two in the Dallas/Fort
Worth market, and one in San Antonio, Texas. The Dallas/Fort Worth market continues to perform at
the mid-point of our range of expectations and we believe we have significant upside potential in
that market through growth in the existing stores and our intention to continue to expand the
number of stores in that market. We have several other locations in Texas and Louisiana that we
believe are promising and, along with new stores in existing markets, are in various stages of
development for opening in fiscal year 2008. We also continue to look at other markets, including
neighboring states for opportunities.
The consumer electronics industry depends on new products to drive same store sales increases.
Typically, these new products, such as digital televisions, DVD players, digital cameras and MP3
players are introduced at relatively high price points that are then gradually reduced as the
product becomes more mainstream. To sustain positive same store sales growth, unit sales must
increase at a rate greater than the decline in product prices. The affordability of the product
helps drive the unit sales growth. However, as a result of relatively short product life cycles in
the consumer electronics industry, which limit the amount of time available for sales volume to
increase, combined with rapid price erosion in the industry, retailers are challenged to maintain
overall gross margin levels and positive same store sales. This has historically been our
experience, and we continue to adjust our marketing strategies to address this challenge through
the introduction of new product categories and new products within our existing categories.
Application of Critical Accounting Policies
In applying the accounting policies that we use to prepare our consolidated financial
statements, we necessarily make accounting estimates that affect our reported amounts of assets,
liabilities, revenues and expenses. Some of these accounting estimates require us to make
assumptions about matters that are highly uncertain at the time we make the accounting estimates.
We base these assumptions and the resulting estimates on authoritative pronouncements, historical
information and other factors that we believe to be reasonable under the circumstances, and we
evaluate these assumptions and estimates on an ongoing basis. We could reasonably use different
accounting estimates, and changes in our accounting estimates could occur from period to period,
with the result in each case being a material change in the financial statement presentation of our
financial condition or results of operations. We refer to accounting estimates of this type as
critical accounting estimates. We believe that the critical accounting estimates discussed below
are among those most important to an understanding of our consolidated financial statements as of
January 31, 2007.
Transfers of Financial Assets. We transfer customer receivables to the QSPE that
issues asset-backed securities to third party lenders using these accounts as collateral, and we
continue to service these accounts after the transfer. We recognize the sale of these accounts when
we relinquish control of the transferred financial asset in accordance with Statement of Financial
Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 140, Accounting for Transfers and Servicing of Financial Assets and
Extinguishment of Liabilities. As we transfer the accounts, we record an asset representing the
interest-only strip, which is cash flows resulting entirely from the interest on the security. The
gain or loss recognized on these transactions is based on our best estimates of key assumptions,
including forecasted credit losses, payment rates, forward yield curves, costs of servicing the
accounts and appropriate discount rates. The use of different estimates or assumptions could
produce different financial results. For example, if we had assumed a 10.0% reduction in net
interest spread (which might be caused by rising interest rates), our interest in securitized
assets would have been reduced by $5.8 million as of January 31, 2007, which may have an adverse
effect on earnings. We recognize income from our interest in these transferred accounts based on
the difference between the interest earned on customer accounts and the costs associated with
financing and servicing the transferred
36
accounts, less a provision for bad debts associated with
the transferred assets. This income is recorded as Finance charges and other in our consolidated
statement of operations. If the assumption used for estimating credit losses was increased 10%,
the impact to recorded Finance charges and other would have been a reduction in revenues and pretax
income of $1.3 million.
In February 2006, SFAS No. 155, Accounting for Certain Hybrid Financial Instruments, was
issued. This statement is an amendment of SFAS No. 133, Accounting for Derivative Instruments and
Hedging Activities, and SFAS No. 140, Accounting for Transfers and Servicing of Financial Assets
and Extinguishments of Liabilities-a replacement of FASB Statement No. 125. This statement permits
fair value remeasurement for any hybrid financial instrument that contains an embedded derivative
that would otherwise require bifurcation, clarifies which interest-only strips and principal-only
strips are not subject to the requirements of SFAS No. 133, establishes a requirement to evaluate
interests in securitized financial assets to identify interests that are freestanding derivatives
or that are hybrid financial instruments that contain an embedded derivative requiring bifurcation,
clarifies that concentrations of credit risk in the form of subordination are not embedded
derivatives and amends SFAS No. 140 to eliminate the prohibition on a qualifying special-purpose
entity from holding a derivative financial instrument that pertains to a beneficial interest other
than another derivative financial instrument. This statement is effective for all financial
instruments acquired or issued after the beginning of an entitys first fiscal year that begins
after September
15, 2006. We are currently analyzing the impact this statement will have on our financial
condition and results of operations.
Deferred Tax Assets. We have net deferred tax assets of approximately $3.5 million as of
January 31, 2007, which are subject to periodic recoverability assessments. Realization of our net
deferred tax assets may be dependent upon whether we achieve projected future taxable income. Our
estimates regarding future profitability may change due to future market conditions, our ability to
continue to execute at historical levels and our ability to continue our growth plans. These
changes, if any, may require material adjustments to these deferred tax asset balances. If we had
assumed that the future tax rate at which these deferred items would reverse was 50 basis points
higher than currently anticipated, we would have increased the net deferred tax asset and increased
net income by approximately $49,000.
In July 2006, FASB Interpretation (FIN) No. 48, Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes, an
interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109, Accounting for Income Taxes, was issued. This
interpretation clarifies the accounting for income taxes by prescribing the minimum recognition
threshold a tax position is required to meet before being recognized in the financial statements.
The interpretation is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2006. We are
currently analyzing the impact this statement will have on our financial condition and results of
operations.
Intangible Assets. We have significant intangible assets related primarily to goodwill. The
determination of related estimated useful lives and whether or not these assets are impaired
involves significant judgments. Effective with the implementation of SFAS No. 142, we ceased
amortizing goodwill and began testing potential impairment of this asset annually based on
judgments regarding ongoing profitability and cash flow of the underlying assets. Changes in
strategy or market conditions could significantly impact these judgments and require adjustments to
recorded asset balances. For example, if we had reason to believe that our recorded goodwill had
become impaired due to decreases in the fair market value of the underlying business, we would have
to take a charge to income for that portion of goodwill that we believe is impaired. Our goodwill
balance at January 31, 2006 and 2007 was $9.6 million.
Property, Plant and Equipment. Our accounting policies regarding land, buildings, and
equipment include judgments regarding the estimated useful lives of such assets, the estimated
residual values to which the assets are depreciated, and the determination as to what constitutes
increasing the life of existing assets. These judgments and estimates may produce materially
different amounts of depreciation and amortization expense than would be reported if different
assumptions were used. These judgments may also impact the need to recognize an impairment charge
on the carrying amount of these assets if the anticipated cash flows associated with the assets are
not realized. In addition, the actual life of the asset and residual value may be different from
the estimates used to prepare financial statements in prior periods.
Revenue Recognition. Revenues from the sale of retail products are recognized at the
time the product is delivered to the customer. Such revenues are recognized net of any adjustments
for sales incentive offers such as discounts, coupons, rebates, or other free products or services.
We sell service
37
maintenance agreements and credit insurance contracts on behalf of unrelated third
parties. For contracts where the third parties are the obligor on the contract, commissions are
recognized in revenues at the time of sale, and in the case of retrospective commissions, based on
claims experience, at the time that they are earned. When we sell service maintenance agreements in
which we are deemed to be the obligor on the contract at the time of sale, revenue is recognized
ratably, on a straight-line basis, over the term of the service maintenance agreement. These direct
obligor service maintenance agreements are renewal contracts that provide our customers protection
against product repair costs arising after the expiration of the manufacturers warranty and the
third party obligor contracts and typically range from 12 months to 36 months. These agreements are
separate units of accounting under Emerging Issues Task Force No. 00-21, Revenue Arrangements with
Multiple Deliverables. The amounts of service maintenance agreement revenue deferred at January 31,
2006 and 2007 were $3.6 million and $3.6 million, respectively, and are included in Deferred
revenue in the accompanying balance sheets. The amounts of service maintenance agreement revenue
recognized for the fiscal years ended January 31, 2005, 2006 and 2007 were $5.0 million, $5.0
million and $4.7 million, respectively.
Vendor Allowances. We receive funds from vendors for price protection, product
rebates, marketing and training and promotion programs which are recorded on the accrual basis as a
reduction to the related product cost or advertising expense according to the nature of the
program. We accrue rebates based on
the satisfaction of terms of the program and sales of qualifying products even though funds
may not be received until the end of a quarter or year. If the programs are related to product
purchases, the allowances, credits or payments are recorded as a reduction of product cost; if the
programs are related to promotion or marketing of the product, the allowances, credits, or payments
are recorded as a reduction of advertising expense in the period in which the expense is incurred.
Share-Based Compensation. In December 2004, SFAS No. 123R, Share-Based Payment, was
issued. Under the requirements of this statement we measure the cost of employee services received
in exchange for an award of equity instruments, typically stock options, based on the grant-date
fair value of the award, and record that cost over the period during which the employee is required
to provide service in exchange for the award. The grant-date fair value is based on our best
estimate of key assumptions, including expected time period over which the options will remain
outstanding and expected stock price volatility at the date of grant. Additionally, we must
estimate expected forfeitures for each stock option grant and adjust the recorded compensation
expense accordingly. The use of different estimates could produce different financial results. See
Note 1 to our financial statements for additional information.
Accounting for Leases. The accounting for leases is governed primarily by SFAS No. 13,
Accounting for Leases. As required by the standard, we analyze each lease, at its inception, to
determine whether it should be accounted for as an operating lease or a capital lease.
Additionally, monthly lease expense for each operating lease is calculated as the average of all
payments required under the minimum lease term, including rent escalations. The minimum lease term
begins with the date we take possession of the property and ends on the last day of the minimum
lease term, and includes all rent holidays, but excludes renewal terms that are at our option. Any
tenant improvement allowances received are deferred and amortized into income as a reduction of
lease expense on a straight line basis over the minimum lease term. The amortization of leasehold
improvements is computed on a straight line basis over the shorter of the remaining lease term or
the estimated useful life of the improvements.
38
Results of Operations
The following table sets forth certain statement of operations information as a
percentage of total revenues for the periods indicated.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years ended January 31, |
|
|
2005 |
|
2006 |
|
2007 |
Revenues: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Product sales |
|
|
79.8 |
% |
|
|
81.3 |
% |
|
|
82.0 |
% |
Service maintenance agreement commissions (net) |
|
|
4.2 |
|
|
|
4.3 |
|
|
|
4.0 |
|
Service revenues |
|
|
3.3 |
|
|
|
2.9 |
|
|
|
3.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total net sales |
|
|
87.3 |
|
|
|
88.5 |
|
|
|
89.0 |
|
Finance charges and other |
|
|
12.7 |
|
|
|
11.5 |
|
|
|
11.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues |
|
|
100.0 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
Cost and expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of goods sold, including warehousing and occupancy costs |
|
|
62.8 |
|
|
|
63.9 |
|
|
|
65.1 |
|
Cost of parts sold, including warehousing and occupancy costs |
|
|
0.8 |
|
|
|
0.7 |
|
|
|
0.9 |
|
Selling, general and administrative expense. |
|
|
27.1 |
|
|
|
26.1 |
|
|
|
25.8 |
|
Provision for bad debts |
|
|
0.5 |
|
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total costs and expenses |
|
|
91.2 |
|
|
|
90.9 |
|
|
|
92.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income |
|
|
8.8 |
|
|
|
9.1 |
|
|
|
8.0 |
|
Interest (income) expense (including minority interest) |
|
|
0.4 |
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
Other (income) expense |
|
|
0.0 |
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings before income taxes |
|
|
8.4 |
|
|
|
9.0 |
|
|
|
8.2 |
|
Provision for income taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current |
|
|
3.0 |
|
|
|
3.2 |
|
|
|
3.0 |
|
Deferred |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total provision for income taxes |
|
|
3.0 |
|
|
|
3.1 |
|
|
|
2.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
|
5.4 |
% |
|
|
5.9 |
% |
|
|
5.3 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In reviewing the percentages reflected in the above table, we noted that the following
trends in our operations developed within the last twelve months.
|
|
|
The increase in cost of goods sold as a percentage of total revenues reflects the
shift in revenue mix as product sales grew faster than service revenues and finance
charges and other. Cost of products sold was 78.6% of net product sales in the 2006
period and 79.4% in the 2007 period. |
|
|
|
|
The decline in selling, general and administrative expense as a percentage of total
revenues resulted primarily from decreased payroll and payroll related expenses and
net advertising expense, as a percent of revenues. |
|
|
|
|
The declining trend in interest expense as a percentage of total revenues is a
function of our continuing to generate positive cash flow. |
The presentation of our gross margins may not be comparable to other retailers since we include the
cost of our in-home delivery service as part of selling, general and administrative expense.
Similarly, we include the cost of merchandising our products, including amounts related to
purchasing the product and a portion of our advertising cost, in selling, general and
administrative expense. It is our understanding that other retailers may include such costs as part
of cost of goods sold.
39
The following table presents certain operations information in dollars and percentage changes
from year to year:
Analysis of Consolidated Statements of Operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006 vs. 2005 |
|
|
2007 vs. 2006 |
|
|
|
Years Ended January 31, |
|
|
Incr/(Decr) |
|
|
Incr/(Decr) |
|
(in thousands except percentages) |
|
2005 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Pct |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Pct |
|
Revenues |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Product sales |
|
$ |
451,560 |
|
|
$ |
569,877 |
|
|
$ |
623,959 |
|
|
$ |
118,317 |
|
|
|
26.2 |
% |
|
$ |
54,082 |
|
|
|
9.5 |
% |
Service maintenance agreement
commissions (net) |
|
|
23,950 |
|
|
|
30,583 |
|
|
|
30,567 |
|
|
|
6,633 |
|
|
|
27.7 |
|
|
|
(16 |
) |
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
Service revenues |
|
|
18,725 |
|
|
|
20,278 |
|
|
|
22,411 |
|
|
|
1,553 |
|
|
|
8.3 |
|
|
|
2,133 |
|
|
|
10.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total net sales |
|
|
494,235 |
|
|
|
620,738 |
|
|
|
676,937 |
|
|
|
126,503 |
|
|
|
25.6 |
|
|
|
56,199 |
|
|
|
9.1 |
|
Finance charges and other |
|
|
71,586 |
|
|
|
80,410 |
|
|
|
83,720 |
|
|
|
8,824 |
|
|
|
12.3 |
|
|
|
3,310 |
|
|
|
4.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues |
|
|
565,821 |
|
|
|
701,148 |
|
|
|
760,657 |
|
|
|
135,327 |
|
|
|
23.9 |
|
|
|
59,509 |
|
|
|
8.5 |
|
Cost of goods and parts sold |
|
|
359,710 |
|
|
|
453,374 |
|
|
|
502,135 |
|
|
|
93,664 |
|
|
|
26.0 |
|
|
|
48,761 |
|
|
|
10.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross Profit |
|
|
206,111 |
|
|
|
247,774 |
|
|
|
258,522 |
|
|
|
41,663 |
|
|
|
20.2 |
|
|
|
10,748 |
|
|
|
4.3 |
|
Gross Margin |
|
|
36.4 |
% |
|
|
35.3 |
% |
|
|
34.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling, general and administrative expense |
|
|
153,534 |
|
|
|
182,728 |
|
|
|
195,908 |
|
|
|
29,194 |
|
|
|
19.0 |
|
|
|
13,180 |
|
|
|
7.2 |
|
Provision for bad debts |
|
|
2,589 |
|
|
|
1,133 |
|
|
|
1,476 |
|
|
|
(1,456 |
) |
|
|
(56.2 |
) |
|
|
343 |
|
|
|
30.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income |
|
|
49,988 |
|
|
|
63,913 |
|
|
|
61,138 |
|
|
|
13,925 |
|
|
|
27.9 |
|
|
|
(2,775 |
) |
|
|
(4.3 |
) |
Operating Margin |
|
|
8.8 |
% |
|
|
9.1 |
% |
|
|
8.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest (income) expense |
|
|
2,359 |
|
|
|
400 |
|
|
|
(676 |
) |
|
|
(1,959 |
) |
|
|
(83.0 |
) |
|
|
(1,076 |
) |
|
|
(269.0 |
) |
Other (income) expense |
|
|
118 |
|
|
|
69 |
|
|
|
(772 |
) |
|
|
(49 |
) |
|
|
(41.5 |
) |
|
|
(841 |
) |
|
|
(1218.8 |
) |
Minority interest in limited partnership |
|
|
118 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(118 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pretax Income |
|
|
47,393 |
|
|
|
63,444 |
|
|
|
62,586 |
|
|
|
16,051 |
|
|
|
33.9 |
|
|
|
(858 |
) |
|
|
(1.4 |
) |
Income taxes |
|
|
16,706 |
|
|
|
22,341 |
|
|
|
22,275 |
|
|
|
5,635 |
|
|
|
33.7 |
|
|
|
(66 |
) |
|
|
(0.3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income available
for common stockholders |
|
$ |
30,687 |
|
|
$ |
41,103 |
|
|
$ |
40,311 |
|
|
$ |
10,416 |
|
|
|
33.9 |
% |
|
$ |
(792 |
) |
|
|
(1.9 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Refer to the above Analysis of Consolidated Statements of Operations in condensed form
while reading the operations review on a year by year basis.
Year Ended January 31, 2006 Compared to the Year Ended January 31, 2007
Revenues. Total revenues increased by $59.5 million, or 8.5%, from $701.1
million for the year ended January 31, 2006 to $760.6 million for the year ended January 31, 2007.
The increase was attributable to increases in net sales of $56.2 million, or 9.1%, and $3.3
million, or 4.1%, in finance charges and other revenue.
The $56.2 million increase in net sales was made up of the following:
|
|
|
a $21.1 million increase resulted from a same store sales increase of 3.6%. The fiscal
2007 growth rate was impacted as a result of being compared to the very strong,
hurricane-impacted prior year sales, which resulted in a same store sales growth rate of
16.9% achieved in the year ended January 31, 2006. |
|
|
|
|
a $35.2 million increase generated by twelve retail locations that were not open for
twelve consecutive months in each period, |
|
|
|
|
a $2.2 million decrease resulted from an increase in discounts on promotional credit sales, and |
|
|
|
|
a $2.1 million increase resulted from an increase in service revenues. |
40
The components of the $56.2 million increase in net sales were a $54.1 million increase in
product sales and an $2.1 million net increase in service maintenance agreement commissions and
service revenues. The $54.1 million increase in product sales resulted from the following:
|
|
|
approximately $34.1 million was attributable to increases in unit sales, due primarily
to increased appliances, consumer electronics (especially micro-display projection and
plasma and LCD flat panel televisions) and furniture sales, partially offset by a decline
in track sales, and |
|
|
|
|
approximately $20.0 million was attributable to increases in unit price points. The
price point impact was driven primarily by consumers selecting higher priced appliance
products, including high-efficiency washers and dryers and stainless steel kitchen
appliances and increased delivery fees, partially offset by a decline in consumer
electronics as prices for new technology erode and the $2.2 million increase in discounts
on extended-term promotional credit sales. |
The following table presents the makeup of net sales by product category in each period,
including service maintenance agreement commissions and service revenues, expressed both in dollar
amounts and as a percent of total net sales. Classification of sales has been adjusted from
previous filings to ensure comparability between the categories.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended January 31, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
Percent |
|
|
|
|
|
Category |
|
Amount |
|
|
Percent |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Percent |
|
|
Increase |
|
|
|
|
|
Major home appliances |
|
$ |
223,294 |
|
|
|
36.0 |
% |
|
$ |
230,963 |
|
|
|
34.1 |
% |
|
|
3.4 |
% |
|
|
(1 |
) |
Consumer electronics |
|
|
186,663 |
|
|
|
30.1 |
|
|
|
214,271 |
|
|
|
31.7 |
|
|
|
14.8 |
|
|
|
(2 |
) |
Track |
|
|
99,184 |
|
|
|
16.0 |
|
|
|
94,395 |
|
|
|
13.9 |
|
|
|
(4.8 |
) |
|
|
(3 |
) |
Delivery |
|
|
9,931 |
|
|
|
1.6 |
|
|
|
11,380 |
|
|
|
1.7 |
|
|
|
14.6 |
|
|
|
(2 |
) |
Lawn and garden |
|
|
17,567 |
|
|
|
2.8 |
|
|
|
16,741 |
|
|
|
2.5 |
|
|
|
(4.7 |
) |
|
|
(4 |
) |
Bedding |
|
|
13,120 |
|
|
|
2.1 |
|
|
|
17,721 |
|
|
|
2.6 |
|
|
|
35.1 |
|
|
|
(5 |
) |
Furniture |
|
|
15,320 |
|
|
|
2.4 |
|
|
|
33,357 |
|
|
|
4.9 |
|
|
|
117.7 |
|
|
|
(5 |
) |
Other |
|
|
4,798 |
|
|
|
0.8 |
|
|
|
5,131 |
|
|
|
0.8 |
|
|
|
6.9 |
|
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total product sales |
|
|
569,877 |
|
|
|
91.8 |
|
|
|
623,959 |
|
|
|
92.2 |
|
|
|
9.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
Service maintenance agreement
commissions |
|
|
30,583 |
|
|
|
4.9 |
|
|
|
30,567 |
|
|
|
4.5 |
|
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
|
|
(6 |
) |
Service revenues |
|
|
20,278 |
|
|
|
3.3 |
|
|
|
22,411 |
|
|
|
3.3 |
|
|
|
10.5 |
|
|
|
(7 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total net sales |
|
$ |
620,738 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
$ |
676,937 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
9.1 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Fiscal year 2006 appliance sales were benefited by strong customer demand after
Hurricanes Katrina and Rita in that year. |
|
(2) |
|
These increases are consistent with overall increase in product sales and
improved unit prices. |
|
(3) |
|
The decline in track sales (consisting largely of computers, computer
peripherals, portable electronics and small appliances) is due primarily to reduced
sales of computers and portable CRT televisions. |
|
(4) |
|
A slower late-summer selling season due to dry weather impacted this category. |
|
(5) |
|
This increase is due to the increased emphasis on the sales of mattresses and
furniture, primarily sofas, recliners and entertainment centers, and new product lines
added to the furniture category. |
|
(6) |
|
This decrease is due to increased SMA cancellations driven by higher credit
charge-offs and reduced sales penetration as we introduced products (furniture and
mattresses) that are not SMA-eligible. |
|
(7) |
|
This increase is driven by increased units in operation as we continue to grow
product sales and an increase in the prices of parts used to repair higher-priced
technology (flat-panel and micro-display television, etc.). |
Revenue from Finance charges and other increased by approximately $3.3 million, or 4.1%,
from $80.4 million for the year ended January 31, 2006, to $83.7 million for the year ended January
31, 2007. This increase in revenue resulted primarily from increases in securitization income of
$3.4 million, a $2.0 million decrease in service maintenance agreement retrospective commissions
and a net increase in insurance commissions and other revenues of $1.9 million. Securitization
income grew at a slower pace than net sales because of higher credit losses experienced during the
year ended January 31, 2007, as a result of the disruption to our credit operations caused by
Hurricane Rita. As a result of the higher loss rate experienced, we recorded an impairment charge
of $1.5 million during the quarter ended July 31, 2006, reducing the value of our interest in
securitized assets. The credit net charge-off rate has returned to historical levels and is
expected to approximate 3.0% during fiscal 2008. We recorded an impairment charge of $0.9 million
during the quarter ended October 31, 2005, for anticipated credit losses due to the impact of
Hurricane Rita on our credit operations and an increase in bankruptcy filings due to the new
bankruptcy law that took effect in
41
October 2005. Securitization income growth is attributable to
higher product sales and increases in our retained interest in assets transferred to the QSPE, due
primarily to increases in the transferred balances. Insurance commissions and other revenue growth
was driven by the increase in product sales The decline in service maintenance agreement
retrospective commissions was due to a change in the commission structure that became effective
during fiscal 2006. The change resulted in us receiving a greater portion of the income at the time
of the sale of the service maintenance agreement, which is included in Total net sales, with a
corresponding decrease in the retrospective commissions received.
Cost of Goods Sold. Cost of goods sold, including warehousing and occupancy cost, increased
by $47.3 million, or 10.6%, from $448.1 million for the year ended January 31, 2006 to $495.4
million for the year ended January 31, 2007. This increase was slightly higher than the 9.5%
increase in net product sales during the year ended January 31, 2007. Cost of products sold
increased from 78.6% of net product sales in the 2006 period to 79.4% in the 2007 period due to
pricing pressures on flat-panel TVs and the fact that the strong fiscal 2006 sales, after the
hurricanes, were achieved with very little discounting.
Cost of Service Parts Sold. Cost of service parts sold, including warehousing and occupancy
cost, increased approximately $1.5 million, or 27.8%, for the year ended January 31, 2007 as
compared to the year ended January 31, 2006, due to a 34.8% increase in parts sales.
Selling, General and Administrative Expense. While Selling, general and administrative
expense increased by $13.2 million, or 7.2%, from $182.7 million for the year ended January 31,
2006 to $195.9 million for the year ended January 31, 2007, it decreased as a percentage of total
revenue from 26.1% to 25.8%. The decrease in expense as a percentage of total revenues resulted
primarily from decreased payroll and payroll related expenses and net advertising expense, as a
percent of revenues. Additionally, $0.9 million of expenses, net of insurance proceeds, were
incurred in the year ended January 31, 2006, due to Hurricane Rita.
Provision for Bad Debts. The provision for bad debts on non-credit portfolio receivables and
credit portfolio receivables retained by the Company and not transferred to the QSPE increased by
$0.3 million, or 30.3%, during the year ended January 31, 2007 as compared to the year ended
January 31, 2006, primarily as a result of provision adjustments due to increased credit losses.
Interest (Income) Expense, net. Net interest (income) expense improved by $1.1 million, from
net interest expense of $400,000 for the year ended January 31, 2006 to net interest income of
approximately $700,000 for the year ended January 31, 2007. The net improvement in interest
(income) expense was attributable to the following factors:
|
|
|
expiration in April 2005 of $20.0 million in our interest rate hedges and the
discontinuation of hedge accounting for derivatives resulted in a net decrease in interest
expense of approximately $244,000; and |
|
|
|
|
increased interest income from invested funds of approximately $539,000. |
The remaining change of $317,000 resulted from lower average outstanding debt balances and
capitalization of interest on construction in progress.
Other (Income) Expense, net. Other (income) expense improved by $0.9 million, from net
expense of $0.1 million for the year ended January 31, 2006, to net income of $0.8 million for the
year ended January 31, 2007. This change was primarily the result of a $0.7 million gain recognized
on the sale of a building and the related land.
Provision for Income Taxes. The provision for income taxes decreased by $66,000, or 0.3%,
from $22.4 million for the year ended January 31, 2006, to $22.3 million for the year ended January
31, 2007. The decrease in the Provision for income taxes is attributable to lower Income before
income taxes, state tax refunds received during the period and adjustments to reconcile final tax
returns to previous estimates, partially offset by additional tax expense from the new Texas margin
tax. The impact of the new Texas margin tax was partially offset by the one-time benefit of
deferred tax assets recorded as a result of the new tax. Our effective rate for the year ended
January 31, 2007 was 35.6%, as compared to 35.2% for the year
42
ended January 31, 2006, as impact of
the Texas margin tax was partially offset by the refunds and return adjustments.
Net Income. As a result of the above factors, Net income decreased $0.8 million, or 1.9%,
from $41.1 million for the year ended January 31, 2006 to $40.3 million for the year ended January
31, 2007.
Year Ended January 31, 2005 Compared to the Year Ended January 31, 2006
Revenues. Total revenues increased by $135.3 million, or 23.9%, from $565.8 million for the
year ended January 31, 2005 to $701.1 million for the year ended January 31, 2006. The increase
was attributable to increases in net sales of $126.5 million, or 25.6%, and $8.8 million, or 12.3%,
in finance charges and other revenue.
The $126.5 million increase in net sales was made up of the following:
|
|
|
a $75.8 million increase resulted from a same store sales increase of 16.9%. Appliance
sales accounted for the majority of the increase and were significantly impacted by our
customers need to replace items damaged as a result of Hurricanes Katrina and Rita. After
adjusting for our estimate of the impact of the storms, we believe same store sales
increased approximately 12%, with appliance, electronics, track and furniture sales being
the biggest contributors. As a result of changes in the commission structure on our
third-party service maintenance agreement (SMA) contracts, beginning July 2005, we began
realizing the benefit of increased front-end commissions on SMA sales, which increased net
sales $1.4 million, (offsetting this increase is a decrease in retrospective commissions
which is reflected in Finance charges and other), |
|
|
|
|
a $49.8 million increase generated by twelve retail locations that were not open for
twelve consecutive months in each period, net of reductions related to the closing of one
location, |
|
|
|
|
a $644,000 decrease resulted from an increase in discounts on promotional credit sales, and |
|
|
|
|
a $1.6 million increase resulted from an increase in service revenues. |
The components of the $126.5 million increase in net sales were a $118.3 million increase in
product sales and an $8.2 million net increase in service maintenance agreement commissions and
service revenues. The $118.3 million increase in product sales resulted from the following:
|
|
|
approximately $82.6 million was attributable to increases in unit sales, due to
increased appliances, track, furniture, and consumer electronics sales, and |
|
|
|
|
approximately $35.7 million was attributable to increases in unit price points. The
price point impact was driven primarily by: |
|
o |
|
consumers selecting higher priced consumer electronics products, as the
new technology becomes more affordable; |
|
|
o |
|
consumers selecting higher priced appliance products, including
high-efficiency washers and dryers and stainless kitchen appliances, and |
|
|
o |
|
higher prices on appliances in general. |
43
The following table presents the makeup of net sales by product category in each period,
including service maintenance agreement commissions and service revenues, expressed both in dollar
amounts and as a percent of total net sales. Classification of sales has been adjusted from
previous filings to ensure comparability between the categories.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended January 31, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
Percent |
|
|
|
|
|
Category |
|
Amount |
|
|
Percent |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Percent |
|
|
Increase |
|
|
|
|
|
Major home appliances |
|
$ |
168,544 |
|
|
|
34.1 |
% |
|
$ |
223,294 |
|
|
|
36.0 |
% |
|
|
32.5 |
% |
|
|
(1 |
) |
Consumer electronics |
|
|
154,873 |
|
|
|
31.3 |
|
|
|
186,663 |
|
|
|
30.1 |
|
|
|
20.5 |
|
|
|
(2 |
) |
Track |
|
|
84,803 |
|
|
|
17.2 |
|
|
|
99,184 |
|
|
|
16.0 |
|
|
|
17.0 |
|
|
|
(2 |
) |
Delivery |
|
|
7,605 |
|
|
|
1.5 |
|
|
|
9,931 |
|
|
|
1.6 |
|
|
|
30.6 |
|
|
|
(2 |
) |
Lawn and garden |
|
|
14,272 |
|
|
|
2.9 |
|
|
|
17,567 |
|
|
|
2.8 |
|
|
|
23.1 |
|
|
|
(2 |
) |
Bedding |
|
|
10,240 |
|
|
|
2.1 |
|
|
|
13,120 |
|
|
|
2.1 |
|
|
|
28.1 |
|
|
|
(2 |
) |
Furniture |
|
|
7,207 |
|
|
|
1.5 |
|
|
|
15,320 |
|
|
|
2.4 |
|
|
|
112.6 |
|
|
|
(3 |
) |
Other |
|
|
4,016 |
|
|
|
0.8 |
|
|
|
4,798 |
|
|
|
0.8 |
|
|
|
19.5 |
|
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total product sales |
|
|
451,560 |
|
|
|
91.4 |
|
|
|
569,877 |
|
|
|
91.8 |
|
|
|
26.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
Service maintenance agreement
commissions |
|
|
23,950 |
|
|
|
4.8 |
|
|
|
30,583 |
|
|
|
4.9 |
|
|
|
27.7 |
|
|
|
(2 |
) |
Service revenues |
|
|
18,725 |
|
|
|
3.8 |
|
|
|
20,278 |
|
|
|
3.3 |
|
|
|
8.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total net sales |
|
$ |
494,235 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
$ |
620,738 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
25.6 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
In addition to strong overall sales growth, appliance sales benefited from our
customers needs after the hurricanes. |
|
(2) |
|
These increases are consistent with overall increase in product sales and
improved unit prices. |
|
(3) |
|
This increase is due to the increased emphasis on the sales of furniture,
primarily sofas, recliners and entertainment centers, and new product lines added to
this category. |
Revenue from Finance charges and other increased by approximately $8.8 million, or 12.3%,
from $71.6 million for the year ended January 31. 2005 to $80.4 million for the year ended January
31, 2006. This increase in revenue resulted primarily from increases in securitization income of
$9.4 million, a $1.0 million decrease in service maintenance agreement retrospective commissions
and a net increase in insurance commissions and other revenues of $445,000. The increase in
securitization income is attributable to higher product sales and increases in our retained
interest in assets transferred to the QSPE, due primarily to increases in the transferred balances.
Partially offsetting the securitization income increases was an impairment charge of $895,000 for
estimated losses resulting from increased bankruptcy filings by our customers prior to October 17,
2005, the effective date of the new bankruptcy law and our estimate of expected additional credit
losses due to the impact of Hurricane Rita.
Cost of Goods Sold. Cost of goods sold, including warehousing and occupancy cost, increased
by $92.9 million, or 26.2%, from $355.2 million for the year ended January 31, 2005 to $448.1
million for the year ended January 31, 2006. This increase was consistent with the 26.2% increase
in net product sales during the year ended January 31, 2006. Cost of products sold was 78.7% of
net product sales in the 2005 period and 78.6% in the 2006 period.
Cost of Service Parts Sold. Cost of service parts sold, including warehousing and occupancy
cost, increased approximately $759,000, or 16.7%, for the year ended January 31, 2006 as compared
to the year ended January 31, 2005, due to increases in parts sales.
Selling, General and Administrative Expense. While Selling, general and administrative
expense increased by $29.2 million, or 19.0%, from $153.5 million for the year ended January 31,
2005 to $182.7 million for the year ended January 31, 2006, it decreased as a percentage of total
revenue from 27.1% to 26.1%. The decrease in expense as a percentage of total revenues resulted
primarily from decreased payroll and payroll related expenses and net advertising expense, as a
percent of revenues, that were
partially offset by increased general liability insurance expense and higher expenses incurred
due to Hurricane Rita of approximately $907,000, net of estimated insurance proceeds, including
expenses related to relocation of the corporate office functions and losses related to damaged
merchandise and facility damage.
44
Provision for Bad Debts. The provision for bad debts on receivables retained by the Company
and not transferred to the QSPE and other non-credit portfolio receivables decreased by $1.5
million, or 56.2%, during the year ended January 31, 2006 as compared to the year ended January 31,
2005, primarily as a result of changes in the loss history and provision adjustments based on
favorable loss experience during the last twelve months, and revised loss allocations between
receivables retained by us and those transferred to the QSPE, which were offset in Finance charges
and other. Partially offsetting the bad debt expense decrease was a charge of $105,000 for
estimated losses resulting from increased bankruptcy filings by our customers prior to October 17,
2005, the effective date of the new bankruptcy law and expected additional credit losses due to the
impact of Hurricane Rita on our customers. See Note 2 to the financial statements for information
regarding the performance of the credit portfolio.
Interest Expense, net. Net interest expense decreased by $2.0 million, or 83.0%, from $2.4
million for the year ended January 31, 2005 to $400,000 for the year ended January 31, 2006. The
net decrease in interest expense was attributable to the following factors:
|
|
|
expiration of $20.0 million in our interest rate hedges and the discontinuation of hedge
accounting for derivatives resulted in a net decrease in interest expense of approximately
$856,000; and |
|
|
|
|
the deconsolidation of SRDS (previously consolidated as a VIE according to FIN 46)
resulted in a decrease of interest expense of $759,000, |
The remaining decrease in interest expense of $385,000 resulted from lower average outstanding
debt balances and higher interest income from invested funds.
Minority Interest. As a result of FIN 46, for the year ended January 31, 2005, we eliminated
the pretax operating profit contributed from the consolidation of SRDS through the minority
interest line item in our consolidated statement of operations (see Note 1 of Notes to the
Financial Statements).
Provision for Income Taxes. The provision for income taxes increased by $5.6 million, or
33.7%, from $16.7 million for the year ended January 31, 2005 to $22.3 million for the year ended
January 31, 2006, consistent with the increase in pretax income of 33.9%.
Net Income. As a result of the above factors, Net income increased $10.4 million, or 33.9%,
from $30.7 million for the year ended January 31, 2005 to $41.1 million for the year ended January
31, 2006.
Impact of Inflation
We do not believe that inflation has a material effect on our net sales or results of
operations. However, a continuing significant increase in oil and gasoline prices could adversely
affect our customers shopping decisions and patterns. We rely heavily on our internal distribution
system and our next day delivery policy to satisfy our customers needs and desires, and any such
significant increases could result in increased distribution charges. Such increases may not affect
our competitors in the same manner as it affects us.
Seasonality and Quarterly Results of Operations
Our business is somewhat seasonal, with a higher portion of sales and operating profit
realized during the quarter that ends January 31, due primarily to the holiday selling season. Over
the four quarters of fiscal 2007, gross margins were 33.8%, 33.5%, 35.3% and 33.6%. During the same
period, operating margins were 9.5%, 6.7%, 6.3% and 9.3%. A portion of the fluctuation in gross
margins and operating margins is due to planned infrastructure cost additions, such as increased
warehouse space and larger stores, additional personnel and systems required to absorb the
significant increase in revenues that we have experienced over the last several years.
Additionally, quarterly results may fluctuate materially depending on factors such as the
following:
|
|
o |
timing of new product introductions, new store openings and store relocations; |
|
|
|
o |
sales contributed by new stores; |
45
|
|
o |
increases or decreases in comparable store sales; |
|
|
|
o |
adverse weather conditions; |
|
|
|
o |
shifts in the timing of certain holidays or promotions; and |
|
|
|
o |
changes in our merchandise mix. |
Results for any quarter are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be achieved for
a full year.
The following tables sets forth certain unaudited quarterly statement of operations
information for the eight quarters ended January 31, 2007. The unaudited quarterly information has
been prepared on a consistent basis and includes all normal recurring adjustments that management
considers necessary for a fair presentation of the information shown.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
|
Quarter Ended |
|
|
|
Apr. 30 |
|
|
Jul. 31 |
|
|
Oct. 31 |
|
|
Jan. 31 |
|
|
|
(dollars and shares in thousands, except per share amounts) |
|
Revenues |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Product sales |
|
$ |
127,275 |
|
|
$ |
130,867 |
|
|
$ |
140,405 |
|
|
$ |
171,330 |
|
Service maintenance agreement commissions (net) |
|
|
6,884 |
|
|
|
7,848 |
|
|
|
7,506 |
|
|
|
8,345 |
|
Service revenues |
|
|
4,775 |
|
|
|
5,134 |
|
|
|
5,157 |
|
|
|
5,212 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total net sales |
|
|
138,934 |
|
|
|
143,849 |
|
|
|
153,068 |
|
|
|
184,887 |
|
Finance charges and other |
|
|
18,985 |
|
|
|
20,711 |
|
|
|
19,521 |
|
|
|
21,193 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues |
|
|
157,919 |
|
|
|
164,560 |
|
|
|
172,589 |
|
|
|
206,080 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percent of annual revenues |
|
|
22.5 |
% |
|
|
23.5 |
% |
|
|
24.6 |
% |
|
|
29.4 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost and expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of goods sold, including warehousing and occupancy costs |
|
|
100,917 |
|
|
|
103,579 |
|
|
|
110,024 |
|
|
|
133,544 |
|
Cost of service parts sold, including warehousing and occupancy costs |
|
|
1,225 |
|
|
|
1,236 |
|
|
|
1,334 |
|
|
|
1,515 |
|
Selling, general and administrative expense |
|
|
39,739 |
|
|
|
44,950 |
|
|
|
47,152 |
|
|
|
50,887 |
|
Provision for bad debts |
|
|
468 |
|
|
|
(137 |
) |
|
|
331 |
|
|
|
471 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total cost and expenses |
|
|
142,349 |
|
|
|
149,628 |
|
|
|
158,841 |
|
|
|
186,417 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating Income |
|
|
15,570 |
|
|
|
14,932 |
|
|
|
13,748 |
|
|
|
19,663 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating Profit as a % total revenues |
|
|
9.9 |
% |
|
|
9.1 |
% |
|
|
8.0 |
% |
|
|
9.5 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest (income) expense |
|
|
355 |
|
|
|
59 |
|
|
|
74 |
|
|
|
(88 |
) |
Other (income) expense |
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
28 |
|
|
|
(27 |
) |
|
|
62 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes |
|
|
15,209 |
|
|
|
14,845 |
|
|
|
13,701 |
|
|
|
19,689 |
|
Total provision for income taxes |
|
|
5,341 |
|
|
|
5,252 |
|
|
|
4,846 |
|
|
|
6,902 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
9,868 |
|
|
$ |
9,593 |
|
|
$ |
8,855 |
|
|
$ |
12,787 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income as a % of revenue |
|
|
6.2 |
% |
|
|
5.8 |
% |
|
|
5.1 |
% |
|
|
6.2 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding shares: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
|
23,307 |
|
|
|
23,366 |
|
|
|
23,458 |
|
|
|
23,523 |
|
Diluted |
|
|
23,775 |
|
|
|
24,012 |
|
|
|
24,265 |
|
|
|
24,532 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings per share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
$ |
0.42 |
|
|
$ |
0.41 |
|
|
$ |
0.38 |
|
|
$ |
0.54 |
|
Diluted |
|
$ |
0.42 |
|
|
$ |
0.40 |
|
|
$ |
0.36 |
|
|
$ |
0.52 |
|
46
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
Quarter Ended |
|
|
|
Apr. 30 |
|
|
Jul. 31 |
|
|
Oct. 31 |
|
|
Jan. 31 |
|
|
|
(dollars and shares in thousands, except per share amounts) |
|
Revenues |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Product sales |
|
$ |
158,509 |
|
|
$ |
150,647 |
|
|
$ |
139,594 |
|
|
$ |
175,209 |
|
Service maintenance agreement commissions (net) |
|
|
7,967 |
|
|
|
7,063 |
|
|
|
6,845 |
|
|
|
8,692 |
|
Service revenues |
|
|
5,229 |
|
|
|
5,927 |
|
|
|
5,951 |
|
|
|
5,304 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total net sales |
|
|
171,705 |
|
|
|
163,637 |
|
|
|
152,390 |
|
|
|
189,205 |
|
Finance charges and other |
|
|
20,483 |
|
|
|
18,567 |
|
|
|
21,303 |
|
|
|
23,367 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues |
|
|
192,188 |
|
|
|
182,204 |
|
|
|
173,693 |
|
|
|
212,572 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percent of annual revenues |
|
|
25.3 |
% |
|
|
24.0 |
% |
|
|
22.8 |
% |
|
|
27.9 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost and expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of goods sold, including warehousing and occupancy costs |
|
|
125,729 |
|
|
|
119,756 |
|
|
|
110,627 |
|
|
|
139,238 |
|
Cost of service parts sold, including warehousing and occupancy costs |
|
|
1,565 |
|
|
|
1,389 |
|
|
|
1,834 |
|
|
|
1,997 |
|
Selling, general and administrative expense |
|
|
46,664 |
|
|
|
48,425 |
|
|
|
49,701 |
|
|
|
51,118 |
|
Provision for bad debts |
|
|
43 |
|
|
|
390 |
|
|
|
526 |
|
|
|
517 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total cost and expenses |
|
|
174,001 |
|
|
|
169,960 |
|
|
|
162,688 |
|
|
|
192,870 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating Income |
|
|
18,187 |
|
|
|
12,244 |
|
|
|
11,005 |
|
|
|
19,702 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating Profit as a % total revenues |
|
|
9.5 |
% |
|
|
6.7 |
% |
|
|
6.3 |
% |
|
|
9.3 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest (income) expense |
|
|
(184 |
) |
|
|
(187 |
) |
|
|
(141 |
) |
|
|
(164 |
) |
Other (income) expense |
|
|
(33 |
) |
|
|
(721 |
) |
|
|
(19 |
) |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes |
|
|
18,404 |
|
|
|
13,152 |
|
|
|
11,165 |
|
|
|
19,865 |
|
Total provision for income taxes |
|
|
6,455 |
|
|
|
4,608 |
|
|
|
4,011 |
|
|
|
7,201 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
11,949 |
|
|
$ |
8,544 |
|
|
$ |
7,154 |
|
|
$ |
12,664 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income as a % of revenue |
|
|
6.2 |
% |
|
|
4.7 |
% |
|
|
4.1 |
% |
|
|
6.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding shares: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
|
23,596 |
|
|
|
23,676 |
|
|
|
23,698 |
|
|
|
23,680 |
|
Diluted |
|
|
24,448 |
|
|
|
24,344 |
|
|
|
24,165 |
|
|
|
24,204 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings per share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
$ |
0.51 |
|
|
$ |
0.36 |
|
|
$ |
0.30 |
|
|
$ |
0.53 |
|
Diluted |
|
$ |
0.49 |
|
|
$ |
0.35 |
|
|
$ |
0.30 |
|
|
$ |
0.52 |
|
Liquidity and Capital Resources
We require capital to finance our growth as we add new stores and markets to our
operations, which in turn requires additional working capital for increased receivables and
inventory. We have historically financed our operations through a combination of cash flow
generated from operations and external borrowings, including primarily bank debt, extended terms
provided by our vendors for inventory purchases, acquisition of inventory under consignment
arrangements and transfers of receivables to our asset-backed securitization facilities. At January
31, 2007, we had a revolving line of credit facility with a group of lenders in the amount of $50
million, under which we had no borrowings outstanding, but utilized $1.9 million of availability to
issue letters of credit. We expect that our cash requirements for the foreseeable future, including
those for our capital expenditure requirements, will be met with our available line of credit and
our $51.3 million of excess cash and cash equivalents, which were invested in short-term, tax-free
instruments, at January 31, 2007, together with cash generated from operations. Our current plans
are to grow our store base by approximately 10% a year. We expect we will invest in inventory, real
estate and customer receivables to support the additional stores and same store sales growth.
Depending on market conditions we may, at times, enter into sale-leaseback transactions to finance
our real estate or seek alternative financing sources for new store expansions and customer
receivables growth.
In its regularly scheduled meeting on August 24, 2006, our Board of Directors authorized the
repurchase of up to $50 million of our common stock, dependent on market conditions and the price
of the stock. We expect to fund these purchases with a combination of excess cash, cash flow from
operations, borrowings under our revolving credit facilities and proceeds from the sale of owned
properties. Through January 31, 2007, we had spent $3.8 million under this authorization to
acquire shares of our common stock.
47
The following is a comparison of our statement of cash flows for our fiscal years 2006 and
2007:
The decrease in cash flow from operating activities for fiscal year 2007 from fiscal year
2006 of $35.5 million, resulted primarily due to the timing of payments of amounts payable for
federal income and employment taxes. Operating cash flows in each year were impacted by
approximately $18.9 million of federal income and employment tax payments due in the year ended
January 31, 2006, that were deferred until February 28, 2006 because of Hurricane Rita.
As noted above, we offer promotional credit programs to certain customers that provide
for same as cash or deferred interest interest-free periods of varying terms, generally three,
six, or 12 months; in fiscal year 2005 we increased these terms to include 18, 24 and 36 months.
The various same as cash promotional accounts and deferred interest program accounts are eligible
for securitization up to the limits provided for in our securitization agreements. This limit is
currently 30.0% of eligible securitized receivables. If we exceed this 30.0% limit, we would be
required to use some of our other capital resources to carry the unfunded balances of the
receivables for the promotional period. The percentage of eligible securitized receivables
represented by promotional receivables was 19.4% as of January 31, 2006, and at January 31, 2007,
the percentage was 20.0%. The weighted average promotional period was 11.8 months and 13.1 months
for promotional receivables outstanding as of January 31, 2006 and 2007, respectively. The
weighted average remaining term on those same promotional receivables was 7.3 months and 9.8 months
as of January 31, 2006 and 2007, respectively. While overall these promotional receivables have a
much shorter weighted average term than non-promotional receivables for the customers that take
advantage of the promotional terms, we receive less income on these receivables, resulting in a
reduction of the net interest margin used in the calculation of the gain on the sale of
receivables.
Net cash used in investing activities was $18.5 million and $16.2 million in fiscal year
2006 and fiscal year 2007, respectively. Cash used for purchases of property and equipment was
approximately $18.5 million in both fiscal year 2006 and fiscal year 2007. The decline in net cash
used in investing activities was due primarily to the proceeds from the sale of one store location
for $2.1 million in fiscal year 2007. The cash expended for property and equipment was used
primarily for construction of new stores and the reformatting of existing stores to better support
our current product mix. We estimate that capital expenditures for the 2007 fiscal year will
approximate $25 million to $30 million.
We lease 55 of our 62 stores, and our plans for future store locations include primarily
leases, but does not exclude store ownership. Our capital expenditures for future store projects
should primarily be for our tenant improvements to the property leased (including any new
distribution centers and warehouses), the cost of which is approximately $1.5 million per store,
and for our existing store remodels, in the range of $170,000 per store remodel, depending on store
size. In the event we purchase existing properties, our capital expenditures will depend on the
particular property and whether it is improved when purchased. We are continuously reviewing new
relationship and funding sources and alternatives for new stores, which may include
sale-leaseback or direct purchase-lease programs, as well as other funding sources for our
purchase and construction of those projects. If we are successful in these relationship
developments, our direct cash needs should include only our capital expenditures for tenant
improvements to leased properties and our remodel programs for existing stores, but could include
full ownership if it meets our cash investment strategy.
Net cash used in financing activities decreased $6.5 million from $7.6 million for the
year ended January 31, 2006, to $1.1 million for the year ended January 31, 2007. This change
resulted primarily from net payments on various debt instruments of $10.7 million in the year ended
January 31, 2006, as opposed to net payments of $0.1 million in the year ended January 31, 2007.
Partially offsetting the decline in the use of cash for payments on debt instruments was the use of
$3.8 million for the purchase of our common stock in fiscal year 2007. We do not expect to incur
significant net borrowing or repayments under our bank credit facilities in fiscal 2008.
We entered into our existing bank credit facility on October 31, 2005. The agreement
provides a line of credit to $50 million, with an accordion feature to allow further expansion of
the facility to $90 million, under certain conditions. The credit facility has a maturity date to
November 1, 2010. Additionally, the facility provides sublimits of $8 million for a swingline line
of credit for faster advances on borrowing requests, and $5 million for standby letters of
credit. Loans under our revolving credit facility may, at our option, bear interest at
either the alternate base rate, which is the greater of the administrative agents prime rate or
the
48
federal funds rate, or the adjusted LIBO/LIBOR rate for the applicable interest period, in each
case plus an applicable interest margin. The interest margin is between 0.00% and 0.50% for base
rate loans and between 0.75% and 1.75% for LIBO/LIBOR alternative rate loans. The interest margin
will vary depending on our debt coverage ratio. We additionally pay commitment fees for the undrawn
portion of our revolving credit facility. At January 31, 2007, based on the LIBO/LIBOR alternative
rate, the interest rate on the revolving facility was 6.32%.
Effective August 28, 2006, we entered into an amendment to our $50 million revolving credit
facility with the existing lenders. The amendment increases our restricted payment capacity, which
includes payments for repurchases of capital stock, from $25 million to $50 million. There were no
other modifications of the Credit Agreement.
A summary of the significant financial covenants that govern our bank credit facility compared
to our actual compliance status at January 31, 2007, is presented below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Required |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Minimum/ |
|
|
Actual |
|
Maximum |
Debt service coverage ratio must exceed required minimum |
|
|
4.28 to 1.00 |
|
|
|
2.00 to 1.00 |
|
Total adjusted leverage ratio must be lower than required maximum |
|
|
1.63 to 1.00 |
|
|
|
3.00 to 1.00 |
|
Adjusted consolidated net worth must exceed required minimum |
|
$286.2 million |
|
$178.9 million |
Charge-off ratio must be lower than required maximum |
|
|
0.02 to 1.00 |
|
|
|
0.06 to 1.00 |
|
Extension ratio must be lower than required maximum |
|
|
0.03 to 1.00 |
|
|
|
0.05 to 1.00 |
|
30-day delinquency ratio must be lower than required maximum |
|
|
0.09 to 1.00 |
|
|
|
0.13 to 1.00 |
|
Note: All terms in the above table are defined by the bank credit facility and may or may not
agree directly to the financial statement captions in this document.
Events of default under the credit facility include, subject to grace periods and notice
provisions in certain circumstances, non-payment of principal, interest or fees; violation of
covenants; material inaccuracy of any representation or warranty; default under or acceleration of
certain other indebtedness; bankruptcy and insolvency events; certain judgments and other
liabilities; certain environmental claims; and a change of control. If an event of default occurs,
the lenders under the credit facility are entitled to take various actions, including accelerating
amounts due under the credit facility and requiring that all such amounts be immediately paid in
full. Our obligations under the credit facility are secured by all of our and our subsidiaries
assets, excluding customer receivables owned by the QSPE and certain inventory subject to vendor
floor plan arrangements.
The following table reflects outstanding commitments for borrowings and letters of credit, and
the amounts utilized under those commitments, as of January 31, 2007:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at |
|
Available at |
|
|
Commitment Expires in Fiscal Year Ending January 31, |
|
January 31, |
|
January 31, |
|
|
2008 |
|
2009 |
|
2010 |
|
2011 |
|
2012 |
|
Thereafter |
|
Total |
|
2007 |
|
2007 |
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revolving Bank Facility (1) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
50,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
50,000 |
|
|
$ |
1,942 |
|
|
$ |
48,058 |
|
Unsecured Line of Credit |
|
|
8,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,000 |
|
Inventory Financing (2) |
|
|
40,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
40,000 |
|
|
|
14,766 |
|
|
|
25,234 |
|
Letters of Credit |
|
|
10,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,000 |
|
|
|
847 |
|
|
|
9,153 |
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
58,000 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
50,000 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
108,000 |
|
|
$ |
17,555 |
|
|
$ |
90,445 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Includes letter of credit sublimit. There was $1.9 million of letters
of credit issued at January 31, 2007. |
|
(2) |
|
Included in accounts payable on the consolidated balance sheet as of
January 31, 2007. |
Since we extend credit in connection with a large portion of our retail, service
maintenance and credit insurance sales, we created a QSPE in 2002 to purchase customer receivables
from us and to issue asset-backed and variable funding notes to third parties to finance its
purchase of these receivables. We transfer receivables, consisting of retail installment contracts
and revolving accounts extended to our customers, to
49
the issuer in exchange for cash, subordinated
securities and the right to receive the interest spread between the assets held by the QSPE and the
notes issued to third parties and our servicing fees. The subordinated securities issued to us
accrue interest based on prime rates and are subordinate to these third party notes.
Both the bank credit facility and the asset-backed securitization program are significant
factors relative to our ongoing liquidity and our ability to meet the cash needs associated with
the growth of our business. Our inability to use either of these programs because of a failure to
comply with their covenants would adversely affect our continued growth. Funding of current and
future receivables under the asset-backed securitization program can be adversely affected if we
exceed certain predetermined levels of re-aging receivables, write-offs, bankruptcies or other
ineligible receivable amounts. If the funding under the asset-backed securitization program were
reduced or terminated, we would have to draw down our bank credit facility more quickly than we
have estimated.
A summary of the total receivables managed under the credit portfolio, including
quantitative information about delinquencies, net credit losses and components of securitized
assets, is presented in Note 2 to our consolidated financial statements.
Based on current operating plans, we believe that cash provided by operating activities,
available borrowings under our credit facility, access to the unfunded portion of the variable
funding portion of our asset- backed securitization program and our current cash and cash
equivalents will be sufficient to fund our operations, store expansion and updating activities and
capital expenditure programs through at least January 31, 2008. However, there are several factors
that could decrease cash provided by operating activities, including:
|
|
|
reduced demand for our products; |
|
|
|
|
more stringent vendor terms on our inventory purchases; |
|
|
|
|
loss of ability to acquire inventory on consignment; |
|
|
|
|
increases in product cost that we may not be able to pass on to our customers; |
|
|
|
|
reductions in product pricing due to competitor promotional activities; |
|
|
|
|
changes in inventory requirements based on longer delivery times of the manufacturers
or other requirements which would negatively impact our delivery and distribution
capabilities; |
|
|
|
|
increases in the retained portion of our receivables portfolio under our current
QSPEs asset-backed securitization program as a result of changes in performance or types
of receivables transferred (promotional versus non-promotional); |
|
|
|
|
inability to expand our capacity for financing our receivables portfolio under new or
replacement QSPE asset-backed securitization programs or a requirement that we retain a
higher percentage of the credit portfolio under such programs; |
|
|
|
|
increases in the program costs (interest and administrative fees relative to our
receivables portfolio) associated with the funding of our receivables; |
|
|
|
|
increases in personnel costs required for us to stay competitive in our markets; and |
|
|
|
|
our inability to obtain a relationship to provide the purchase of and financing of our
capital expenditures for our new stores. |
If cash provided by operating activities during this period is less than we expect or if we
need additional financing for future growth, we may need to increase our revolving credit facility
or undertake additional equity or debt offerings. We may not be able to obtain such financing on
favorable terms, if at all.
Off-Balance Sheet Financing Arrangements
Since we extend credit in connection with a large portion of our retail, service
maintenance and credit insurance sales, we have created a qualified special purpose entity, which
we refer to as the QSPE or the issuer, to purchase customer receivables from us and to issue
asset-backed and variable funding notes to
50
third parties to obtain cash for these purchases. We
transfer receivables, consisting of retail installment contracts and revolving accounts extended to
our customers, to the issuer in exchange for cash and subordinated, unsecured promissory notes. To
finance its acquisition of these receivables, the issuer has issued the notes and bonds described
below to third parties. The unsecured promissory notes issued to us are subordinate to these third
party notes and bonds.
In August 2006, the issuer entered into an amendment of the Series A note to increase the
total available funding to $300 million from $250 million, divided into a $100 million 364-day
tranche, and a $200 million tranche that expires in August 2011. The Companys QSPE closed and
consummated an offering, pursuant to Rule 144A and Regulation S under the Securities Act of 1933,
of $150 million of asset-backed fixed-rate notes (Series 2006 A bonds), the net proceeds of which
were used primarily to provide the QSPE with additional capacity, fund a required $6.0 million cash
reserve account and to reduce the amount outstanding under the existing 2002 Series A variable
funding note. The proceeds of the new issuance provide the issuer additional capacity for the
purchase of our receivables and to make the $10 million monthly principal payments due on the 2002
Series B bonds, which began in October 2006.
At January 31, 2007, the issuer has issued three series of notes: the 2002 Series A variable
funding note with a total availability of $300.0 million purchased by Three Pillars Funding
Corporation, three classes of 2002 Series B notes in the aggregate amount outstanding of $160.0
million, of which $8.0 million was required to be placed in a restricted cash account for the
benefit of the bondholders, and three classes of 2006 Series A bonds with an aggregate amount
outstanding of $150.0 million, of which $6.0 million was required to be placed in a restricted cash
account for the benefit of the bondholders. The commercial paper underlying the 2002 Series A
variable funding note is rated A1/P1 by Standard and Poors and Moodys, respectively. These ratings
represent the highest rating (highest quality) of each rating agencys three short-term investment
grade ratings, except that Standard and Poors could add a + which would convert the highest
quality rating to an extremely strong rating. The 2002 Series B notes consist of: Class A notes in
the amount $96.0 million, rated Aaa by Moodys representing the highest rating (highest quality) of
the four long term investment grade ratings provided by this organization; Class B notes in the
amount $46.2 million, rated A2 by Moodys representing the middle of the third rating (upper medium
quality) of the four long term investment grade ratings provided by this organization; and Class C
notes in the amount of $17.8 million, rated Baa2/BBB by Moodys and Fitch, respectively. The 2006
Series A notes consist of: Class A notes in the amount $90.0 million, rated Aaa by Moodys
representing the highest rating (highest quality) of the four long term investment grade ratings
provided by this organization; Class B notes in the amount $43.3 million, rated A2 by Moodys
representing the middle of the third rating (upper medium quality) of the four long term investment
grade ratings provided by this organization; and Class C notes in the amount of $16.7 million,
rated Baa2 by Moodys. These ratings represent the lowest of the four investment grades (medium
quality) provided by these organizations. The ratings disclosed are not recommendations to buy,
sell or hold securities. These ratings may be changed or withdrawn at any time without notice, and
each of the ratings should be evaluated independently of any other rating. We are not aware of a
rating by any other rating organization and are not aware of any changes in these ratings. Private
institutional investors, primarily insurance companies, purchased the 2002 Series B notes and 2006
Series A notes. The issuer used the proceeds of these issuances to purchase eligible accounts
receivable from us and to fund the required $8.0 million restricted cash account for credit
enhancement of the 2002 Series B notes and the required $6.0 million restricted cash account for
credit enhancement of the 2006 Series A notes.
In August 2006, certain of the existing transaction documents related to the activities
of the QSPE were amended. The following is a summary of the key amendments:
|
|
|
increase our consolidated net worth requirement from $30 million to $150 million; |
|
|
|
|
add certain return mail procedures to the internal accounting control procedures and
processing functions report delivered by independent accountants pursuant to the servicing
agreement; |
|
|
|
|
change the definition of Eligible Installment Contract Receivable under the base
indenture to allow up to 27.5% of all receivables by outstanding principal balance to
consist of installment contract receivables of the secondary portfolio (formerly 25% of
such receivables were permitted, was 23.9% at January 31, 2007); |
51
|
|
|
change the definition of Eligible Installment Contract Receivable and Eligible
Revolving Charge Receivable under the base indenture to allow up to 5.0% of the amount or
number of installment contract and revolving charge receivables, whichever occurs first, to
have a maximum repayment period and cash option period exceeding thirty-six months but no
more than forty-eight months (secondary portfolio maximum term remains thirty-six months); |
|
|
|
|
change certain definitions under the series supplements for the Series A notes and the
Series B bonds, including changes to the series supplements for the Series A notes that
have the effect of increasing the current level of funding available to the issuer; and |
|
|
|
|
provide for the issuers issuance of additional asset-backed notes and obtain additional
commitments under the 2002 Series A notes upon the occurrence of certain events related to
the expiration of any commitment under the 2002 Series A notes or the amount of the
commitment used under the 2002 Series A notes. |
We are entitled to a monthly servicing fee, so long as we act as servicer, in an amount equal
to .25% multiplied by the average aggregate principal amount of receivables plus the amount of
average aggregate defaulted receivables. The issuer records revenues equal to the interest charged
to the customer on the receivables less losses, the cost of funds, the program administration fees
paid to either Three Pillars Funding Corporation or the 2002 Series B note holders or Series 2006 A
note holders, and the servicing fee. SunTrust Capital Markets, Inc. serves as an administrative
agent for Three Pillars Funding Corporation in connection with the Series A variable funding note.
After the August, 2006 amendment, the 2002 Series A variable funding note now permits the
issuer to borrow funds up to $300 million to purchase receivables from us, thereby functioning as a
basket to accumulate receivables. As issuer borrowings under the 2002 Series A variable funding
note approach $300 million, the issuer is required to request an increase in the 2002 Series A
amount or issue a new series of bonds and use the proceeds to pay down the then outstanding balance
of the 2002 Series A variable funding note, so that the basket will once again become available to
accumulate new receivables or meet other obligations required under the transaction documents. As
of January 31, 2007, borrowings under the 2002 Series A variable funding note were $128.0 million.
The Series A variable funding note bears interest at the commercial paper rate plus an
applicable margin, in most instances of 0.8%. The 2002 Series B notes have fixed rates of 4.469%,
5.769% and 8.180% for the Class A, B and C notes, respectively. The 2006 Series A notes have fixed
rates of 5.507%, 5.854% and 6.814% for the Class A, B and C notes, respectively. In addition, there
is an annual administrative fee and a non-use fee associated with the unused portion of the
committed facility.
We are not directly liable to the lenders under the asset-backed securitization facility. If
the issuer is unable to repay the 2002 Series A note, 2002 Series B bonds and Series 2006 A bonds
due to its inability to collect the transferred customer accounts, the issuer could not pay the
subordinated notes it has issued to us in partial payment for transferred customer accounts, the
2002 Series B and Series 2006 A bond holders could claim the balance in its $14.0 million
restricted cash account. We are also contingently liable under a $20.0 million letter of credit
that secures our performance of our obligations or services under the servicing agreement as it
relates to the transferred assets that are part of the asset-backed securitization
facility.
The issuer is subject to certain affirmative and negative covenants contained in the
transaction documents governing the 2002 Series A variable funding note and the 2002 Series B and
Series 2006 A
bonds, including covenants that restrict, subject to specified exceptions: the incurrence of
additional indebtedness and other obligations and the granting of additional liens; mergers,
acquisitions, investments and disposition of assets; and the use of proceeds of the program. The
issuer also makes covenants relating to compliance with certain laws, payment of taxes, maintenance
of its separate legal entity, preservation of its existence, protection of collateral and financial
reporting. In addition, the program requires the issuer to maintain a minimum net worth.
52
A summary of the significant financial covenants that govern the 2002 Series A variable
funding note compared to actual compliance status at January 31, 2007, is presented below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Required |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Minimum/ |
|
|
As reported |
|
Maximum |
Issuer interest must exceed required minimum |
|
$49.8 million |
|
$52.0 million |
Gross loss rate must be lower than required maximum |
|
|
3.5 |
% |
|
|
10.0 |
% |
Net portfolio yield must exceed required minimum |
|
|
8.1 |
% |
|
|
2.0 |
% |
Payment rate must exceed required minimum |
|
|
7.1 |
% |
|
|
3.0 |
% |
Note: All terms in the above table are defined by the asset backed credit facility and may or may
not agree directly to the financial statement captions in this document.
As indicated in the table above, the minimum issuer interest requirement was not satisfied as
of January 31, 2007. The minimum issuer interest requirement is calculated based on information
that is not available until after the end of the month. Upon determining the new minimum issuer
interest requirement, the Issuer deposited the collateral necessary to satisfy the required
minimum. This deficiency was cured within the time periods provided and does not limit the Issuers
ability to meet its obligations, including funding the transfer of future receivables created by
us. As a result, the occurrence of this deficiency did not result in any unscheduled amortization
requirements for the 2002 Series A, 2002 Series B or 2006 Series A Notes.
Events of default under the 2002 Series A variable funding note and the 2002 Series B and
Series 2006 A bonds, subject to grace periods and notice provisions in some circumstances, include,
among others: failure of the issuer to pay principal, interest or fees; violation by the issuer of
any of its covenants or agreements; inaccuracy of any representation or warranty made by the
issuer; certain servicer defaults; failure of the trustee to have a valid and perfected first
priority security interest in the collateral; default under or acceleration of certain other
indebtedness; bankruptcy and insolvency events; failure to maintain certain loss ratios and
portfolio yield; change of control provisions and certain events pertaining to us. The issuers
obligations under the program are secured by the receivables and proceeds.
Securitization Facilities
We finance most of our customer receivables through asset-backed
securitization facilities
53
Certain Transactions
Since 1996, we have leased a retail store location of approximately 19,150 square feet in
Houston, Texas from Thomas J. Frank, Sr., our Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer.
The lease provides for base monthly rental payments of $17,235 plus escrows for taxes, insurance
and common area maintenance expenses of increasing monthly amounts based on expenditures by the
management company operating the shopping center of which this store is a part through January 31,
2011. We also have an option to renew the lease for two additional five-year terms. Mr. Frank
received total payments under this lease of $281,000 in fiscal 2005, 2006 and 2007, respectively.
Based on market lease rates for comparable retail space in the area, we believe that the terms of
this lease are no less favorable to us than we could have obtained in an arms length transaction
at the date of the lease commencement.
We leased six store locations from Specialized Realty Development Services, LP (SRDS), a real
estate development company that was created prior to our becoming publicly held and was owned by
various members of management and individual investors of Stephens Group, Inc., a significant
shareholder of the company. Based on independent appraisals that were performed on each project
that was completed, we believe that the terms of the leases were at least comparable to those that
could be obtained in an arms length transaction. As part of the ongoing operation of SRDS, we
received management fees associated with the administrative functions that were provided to SRDS of
$100,000 and $6,500 for the years ended January 31, 2005 and 2006, respectively. As of January 31,
2005, we no longer leased any properties from SRDS since it divested itself of the leased
properties. As part of the divestiture, SRDS reimbursed us $75,000 for costs related to lease
modifications.
We engage the services of Direct Marketing Solutions, Inc., or DMS, for a substantial portion
of our direct mail advertising. Direct Marketing Solutions, Inc. is partially owned (less than
50%) by SF Holding Corp., members of the Stephens family,
Jon E. M. Jacoby, and Douglas H. Martin. SF Holding Corp. and the members of the Stephens family are significant shareholders of the
Company, and Messrs. Jacoby and Martin are members of our Board of Directors. The fees we paid to
DMS during fiscal years ended 2005, 2006 and 2007 amounted to approximately $1.8 million, $4.3
million and $5.8 million, respectively. Thomas J. Frank, the Chief Executive Officer and Chairman
of the Board of Directors owned a small percentage (0.7%) at the end of fiscal year 2005, but
divested his interest during the first half of fiscal year 2006.
We engage the services of Stephens Inc. to act as our broker under our stock repurchase
program. Stephens Inc. is a shareholder of the Company, and Doug Martin, an Executive Vice
President of Stephens Inc., is a member of our Board of Directors. During the year ended January
31, 2007, we incurred fees payable to Stephens Inc. of $5,040 related to the purchase of 168,000
shares of our common stock. Based on a review of competitive bids received from various broker
candidates, we believe the terms of this arrangement are no less favorable than we could have
obtained in an arms length transaction.
54
Contractual Obligations
The following table presents a summary of our known contractual obligations as of January
31, 2007, with respect to the specified categories, classified by payments due per period.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payments due by period |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
More |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Than |
|
|
1-3 |
|
|
3-5 |
|
|
Than 5 |
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
1 Year |
|
|
Years |
|
|
Years |
|
|
Years |
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
Long term debt |
|
$ |
198 |
|
|
$ |
110 |
|
|
$ |
88 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Operating leases: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Real estate |
|
|
113,831 |
|
|
|
16,042 |
|
|
|
29,283 |
|
|
|
24,377 |
|
|
|
44,129 |
|
Equipment |
|
|
5,116 |
|
|
|
1,689 |
|
|
|
2,538 |
|
|
|
844 |
|
|
|
45 |
|
Purchase obligations (1) |
|
|
1,944 |
|
|
|
1,632 |
|
|
|
312 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total contractual cash obligations |
|
$ |
121,089 |
|
|
$ |
19,473 |
|
|
$ |
32,221 |
|
|
$ |
25,221 |
|
|
$ |
44,174 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Includes contracts for long-term communication services. Does not include
outstanding purchase orders for merchandise, services or supplies which are ordered in
the normal course of operations and which generally are received and recorded within 30
days. |
ITEM 7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK.
Interest rates under our bank credit facility are variable and are determined, at our option,
as the base rate, which is the greater of prime rate or federal funds rate plus 0.50% plus the base
rate margin, which ranges from 0.00% to 0.50%, or LIBO/LIBOR plus the LIBO/LIBOR margin, which
ranges from 0.75% to 1.75%. Accordingly, changes in the prime rate, the federal funds rate or
LIBO/LIBOR, which are affected by changes in interest rates generally, will affect the interest
rate on, and therefore our costs under, our bank credit facility. We are also exposed to interest
rate risk associated with our interest-only strip and the subordinated securities we receive from
our sales of receivables to the QSPE. See Note 2 to the audited financial statements for
disclosures related to the sensitivity of the current fair value of the interest-only strip and the
subordinated securities to 10% and 20% adverse changes in the factors that affect these assets,
including interest rates.
We held interest rate swaps and collars with notional amounts totaling $20.0 million with
terms extending through April 2005. Those instruments were held for the purpose of hedging variable
interest rate risk, primarily related to cash flows from our interest-only strip as well as our
variable rate debt. In fiscal 2004, hedge accounting was discontinued for the remaining $20.0
million. At the time the cash flow hedge designation was discontinued, we began to recognize
changes in the fair value of the swaps as interest expense and to amortize the accumulated other
comprehensive loss related to those derivatives as interest expense over the period that the
forecasted transactions effected the statement of operations. During fiscal 2005, we reclassified
$1.1 million of losses previously recorded in accumulated other comprehensive losses into the
statement of operations and recorded $1.1 million of income into the statement of operations
because of the change in fair value of the swaps. During fiscal 2006, we reclassified $0.2 million
of losses previously recorded in accumulated other comprehensive losses into the statement of
operations and
recorded $0.2 million of income into the statement of operations because of the change in fair
value of the swaps.
55
ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA.
INDEX TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page |
|
|
|
|
57 |
|
|
|
|
|
58 |
|
|
|
|
|
59 |
|
|
|
|
|
60 |
|
|
|
|
|
61 |
|
|
|
|
|
62 |
|
|
|
|
|
63 |
|
|
|
|
|
64 |
|
56
Managements Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over
financial reporting as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) or Rule 15(d)-15(f) under the Exchange Act. Our
internal control over financial reporting is designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the
reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external
purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or
detect misstatements. Therefore, even those systems determined to be effective can provide only
reasonable assurance with respect to financial statement preparation and presentation.
Our management (with the participation of our principal executive officer and our principal
financial officer) assessed the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as
of January 31, 2007. In making this assessment, management used the criteria set forth by the
Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO) in Internal Control
Integrated Framework. Based on our assessment and those criteria, management believes that, as of
January 31, 2007, our internal control over financial reporting is effective.
Managements assessment of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of
January 31, 2007 has been audited by Ernst & Young LLP, an independent registered public accounting
firm, as stated in their report which is included elsewhere herein.
Conns, Inc.
Beaumont, Texas
March 28, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
David L. Rogers |
|
|
Chief Financial Officer |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Thomas J. Frank |
|
|
Chief Executive Officer |
|
|
57
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
The Board of Directors and Shareholders of Conns, Inc.
We have audited managements assessment, included in the accompanying Managements Report on
Internal Control Over Financial Reporting, that Conns, Inc. maintained effective internal control
over financial reporting as of January 31, 2007, based on criteria established in Internal
ControlIntegrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway
Commission (the COSO criteria). Conns, Inc.s management is responsible for maintaining effective
internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal
control over financial reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on managements
assessment and an opinion on the effectiveness of the companys internal control over financial
reporting based on our audit.
We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight
Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was
maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal
control over financial reporting, evaluating managements assessment, testing and evaluating the
design and operating effectiveness of internal control, and performing such other procedures as we
considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis
for our opinion.
A companys internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable
assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial
statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A
companys internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1)
pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the
transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that
transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance
with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company
are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company;
and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized
acquisition, use, or disposition of the companys assets that could have a material effect on the
financial statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or
detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are
subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that
the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
In our opinion, managements assessment that Conns, Inc. maintained effective internal control
over financial reporting as of January 31, 2007, is fairly stated, in all material respects, based
on the COSO criteria. Also, in our opinion, Conns, Inc. maintained, in all material respects,
effective internal control over financial reporting as of January 31, 2007, based on the COSO
criteria.
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight
Board (United States), the consolidated balance sheets of Conns, Inc. as of January 31, 2007 and
2006, and the related consolidated statements of operations, shareholders equity, and cash flows
for each of the three years in the period ended January 31, 2007 of Conns, Inc. and our report
dated March 28, 2007 expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.
Ernst & Young LLP
Houston, Texas
March 28, 2007
58
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
The Board of Directors and Shareholders of Conns, Inc.
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Conns, Inc. as of January 31, 2007
and 2006, and the related consolidated statements of operations, shareholders equity, and cash
flows for each of the three years in the period ended January 31, 2007. Our audits also included
the financial statement schedule listed in the Index at Item 15(a). These financial statements and
schedule are the responsibility of the Companys management. Our responsibility is to express an
opinion on these financial statements and schedule based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight
Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An
audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the
financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and
significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement
presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material
respects, the consolidated financial position of Conns, Inc. at January 31, 2007 and 2006, and the
consolidated results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the period
ended January 31, 2007, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. Also,
in our opinion, the related financial statement schedule, when considered in relation to the basic
financial statements taken as a whole, presents fairly in all material respects the information set
forth therein.
As discussed in Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements, on February 1, 2006, the Company
changed its method of accounting for share-based compensation.
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight
Board (United States), the effectiveness of Conns, Inc.s internal control over financial
reporting as of January 31, 2007, based on criteria established in Internal Control Integrated
Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission and our
report dated March 28, 2007, expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.
Ernst & Young LLP
Houston,
Texas
March 28, 2007
59
Conns,
Inc.
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(in thousands, except share data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
January 31, |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
45,176 |
|
|
$ |
56,570 |
|
Accounts receivable, net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $914 and $821, respectively |
|
|
26,904 |
|
|
|
31,448 |
|
Interest in securitized assets |
|
|
139,282 |
|
|
|
136,848 |
|
Inventories |
|
|
73,987 |
|
|
|
87,098 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
551 |
|
Prepaid expenses and other assets |
|
|
4,004 |
|
|
|
5,247 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets |
|
|
289,353 |
|
|
|
317,762 |
|
Non current deferred income tax asset |
|
|
1,561 |
|
|
|
2,920 |
|
Property and equipment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Land |
|
|
6,671 |
|
|
|
9,102 |
|
Buildings |
|
|
7,084 |
|
|
|
13,896 |
|
Equipment and fixtures |
|
|
9,612 |
|
|
|
13,650 |
|
Transportation equipment |
|
|
3,284 |
|
|
|
3,022 |
|
Leasehold improvements |
|
|
65,507 |
|
|
|
66,761 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subtotal |
|
|
92,158 |
|
|
|
106,431 |
|
Less accumulated depreciation |
|
|
(37,332 |
) |
|
|
(46,991 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total property and equipment, net |
|
|
54,826 |
|
|
|
59,440 |
|
Goodwill, net |
|
|
9,617 |
|
|
|
9,617 |
|
Other assets, net |
|
|
260 |
|
|
|
208 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
355,617 |
|
|
$ |
389,947 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities and Stockholders Equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current Liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current portion of long term debt |
|
$ |
136 |
|
|
$ |
110 |
|
Accounts payable |
|
|
44,282 |
|
|
|
54,045 |
|
Accrued compensation and related expenses |
|
|
18,847 |
|
|
|
9,234 |
|
Accrued expenses |
|
|
17,380 |
|
|
|
20,424 |
|
Income taxes payable |
|
|
8,794 |
|
|
|
3,693 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
1,343 |
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred revenues and allowances |
|
|
8,498 |
|
|
|
9,516 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities |
|
|
99,280 |
|
|
|
97,022 |
|
Long term debt |
|
|
|
|
|
|
88 |
|
Deferred gain on sale of property |
|
|
476 |
|
|
|
309 |
|
Stockholders equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock ($0.01 par value, 1,000,000 shares authorized; none issued or outstanding) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock ($0.01 par value, 40,000,000 shares authorized; 23,571,564 and 23,809,522
shares issued and outstanding at January 31, 2006 and 2007, respectively) |
|
|
236 |
|
|
|
238 |
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income |
|
|
10,492 |
|
|
|
6,305 |
|
Additional paid in capital |
|
|
89,027 |
|
|
|
93,365 |
|
Retained earnings |
|
|
156,106 |
|
|
|
196,417 |
|
Treasury stock at cost (168,000 shares at January 31, 2007) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,797 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity |
|
|
255,861 |
|
|
|
292,528 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders equity |
|
$ |
355,617 |
|
|
$ |
389,947 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
60
Conns,
Inc.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(in thousands, except earnings per share)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended January 31, |
|
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Revenues |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Product sales |
|
$ |
451,560 |
|
|
$ |
569,877 |
|
|
$ |
623,959 |
|
Service maintenance agreement commissions (net) |
|
|
23,950 |
|
|
|
30,583 |
|
|
|
30,567 |
|
Service revenues |
|
|
18,725 |
|
|
|
20,278 |
|
|
|
22,411 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total net sales |
|
|
494,235 |
|
|
|
620,738 |
|
|
|
676,937 |
|
Finance charges and other |
|
|
71,586 |
|
|
|
80,410 |
|
|
|
83,720 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues |
|
|
565,821 |
|
|
|
701,148 |
|
|
|
760,657 |
|
Cost and expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of goods sold, including warehousing and occupancy costs |
|
|
355,159 |
|
|
|
448,064 |
|
|
|
495,350 |
|
Cost of service parts sold, including warehousing and occupancy cost |
|
|
4,551 |
|
|
|
5,310 |
|
|
|
6,785 |
|
Selling, general and administrative expense |
|
|
153,526 |
|
|
|
182,728 |
|
|
|
195,908 |
|
Provision for bad debts |
|
|
2,589 |
|
|
|
1,133 |
|
|
|
1,476 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total cost and expenses |
|
|
515,825 |
|
|
|
637,235 |
|
|
|
699,519 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income |
|
|
49,996 |
|
|
|
63,913 |
|
|
|
61,138 |
|
Interest (income) expense |
|
|
2,359 |
|
|
|
400 |
|
|
|
(676 |
) |
Other (income) expense |
|
|
126 |
|
|
|
69 |
|
|
|
(772 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before minority interest and income taxes |
|
|
47,511 |
|
|
|
63,444 |
|
|
|
62,586 |
|
Minority interest in limited partnership |
|
|
118 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes |
|
|
47,393 |
|
|
|
63,444 |
|
|
|
62,586 |
|
Provision for income taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current |
|
|
16,147 |
|
|
|
23,048 |
|
|
|
23,355 |
|
Deferred |
|
|
559 |
|
|
|
(707 |
) |
|
|
(1,080 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total provision for income taxes |
|
|
16,706 |
|
|
|
22,341 |
|
|
|
22,275 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Income |
|
$ |
30,687 |
|
|
$ |
41,103 |
|
|
$ |
40,311 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings per share |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
$ |
1.32 |
|
|
$ |
1.76 |
|
|
$ |
1.70 |
|
Diluted |
|
$ |
1.30 |
|
|
$ |
1.71 |
|
|
$ |
1.66 |
|
Average common shares outstanding |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
|
23,192 |
|
|
|
23,412 |
|
|
|
23,663 |
|
Diluted |
|
|
23,646 |
|
|
|
24,088 |
|
|
|
24,289 |
|
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
61
Conns,
Inc.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY
(in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accum. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Compre- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred Stock |
|
|
Common Stock |
|
|
hensive |
|
|
Paid in |
|
|
Retained |
|
|
Treasury Stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Income |
|
|
Capital |
|
|
Earnings |
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Total |
|
Balance January 31, 2004 |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
23,102 |
|
|
$ |
231 |
|
|
$ |
4,600 |
|
|
$ |
82,764 |
|
|
$ |
84,316 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
171,911 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercise of options |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
including tax benefit |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
162 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,465 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,467 |
|
Issuance of common stock under
Employee Stock Purchase Plan |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
109 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
109 |
|
Forfeiture of restricted shares |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock-based compensation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
752 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
752 |
|
Comprehensive Income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30,687 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30,687 |
|
Reclassification adjustments
on derivative instruments
(net of tax of $399) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
732 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
732 |
|
Adjustment of fair value of
securitized assets (net of
tax of $1,674), net of
reclassification adjustments of
$10,943 (net of tax of $5,919) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,076 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,076 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
34,495 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance January 31, 2005 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23,268 |
|
|
|
233 |
|
|
|
8,408 |
|
|
|
85,090 |
|
|
|
115,003 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
208,734 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercise of options,
including tax benefit |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
293 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,579 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,582 |
|
Issuance of common stock under
Employee Stock Purchase Plan |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
192 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
192 |
|
Stock-based compensation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,166 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,166 |
|
Comprehensive Income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
41,103 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
41,103 |
|
Reclassification adjustments
on derivative instruments
(net of tax of $86) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
160 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
160 |
|
Adjustment of fair value of
securitized assets (net of
tax of $1038), net of
reclassification adjustments of
$12,626 (net of tax of $6,828) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,924 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,924 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
43,187 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance January 31, 2006 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23,572 |
|
|
|
236 |
|
|
|
10,492 |
|
|
|
89,027 |
|
|
|
156,106 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
255,861 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercise of options,
including tax benefit |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
226 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,370 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,372 |
|
Issuance of common stock under
Employee Stock Purchase Plan |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
245 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
245 |
|
Stock-based compensation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,723 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,723 |
|
Purchase of treasury stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(168 |
) |
|
|
(3,797 |
) |
|
|
(3,797 |
) |
Comprehensive Income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
40,311 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
40,311 |
|
Adjustment of fair value of
securitized assets (net of
tax of $2,154), net of reclassification adjustments of
$12,732 (net of tax of $7,100) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,187 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,187 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
36,124 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance January 31, 2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
23,810 |
|
|
$ |
238 |
|
|
$ |
6,305 |
|
|
$ |
93,365 |
|
|
$ |
196,417 |
|
|
|
(168 |
) |
|
$ |
(3,797 |
) |
|
$ |
292,528 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
62
Conns,
Inc.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended January 31, |
|
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Cash flows from operating activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
30,687 |
|
|
$ |
41,103 |
|
|
$ |
40,311 |
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation |
|
|
8,777 |
|
|
|
11,271 |
|
|
|
12,520 |
|
Amortization |
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
(318 |
) |
|
|
(461 |
) |
Provision for bad debts |
|
|
2,589 |
|
|
|
1,133 |
|
|
|
1,476 |
|
Stock-based compensation |
|
|
752 |
|
|
|
1,166 |
|
|
|
1,723 |
|
Excess tax benefits from stock-based compensation |
|
|
(59 |
) |
|
|
(134 |
) |
|
|
(210 |
) |
Accretion from interests in securitized assets |
|
|
(16,862 |
) |
|
|
(19,454 |
) |
|
|
(19,832 |
) |
Provision for deferred income taxes |
|
|
559 |
|
|
|
(707 |
) |
|
|
(1,080 |
) |
Loss (gain) from sale of property and equipment |
|
|
126 |
|
|
|
69 |
|
|
|
(772 |
) |
Discounts on promotional credit, net |
|
|
1,571 |
|
|
|
691 |
|
|
|
1,913 |
|
Losses (gains) from derivatives |
|
|
(15 |
) |
|
|
69 |
|
|
|
|
|
Change in operating assets and liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable |
|
|
(26,098 |
) |
|
|
1,701 |
|
|
|
4,631 |
|
Inventory |
|
|
(8,604 |
) |
|
|
(11,641 |
) |
|
|
(13,111 |
) |
Prepaid expenses and other assets |
|
|
(515 |
) |
|
|
(452 |
) |
|
|
(1,243 |
) |
Accounts payable |
|
|
696 |
|
|
|
13,812 |
|
|
|
13,125 |
|
Accrued expenses |
|
|
7,697 |
|
|
|
15,751 |
|
|
|
(6,569 |
) |
Income taxes payable |
|
|
(2,430 |
) |
|
|
8,794 |
|
|
|
(5,120 |
) |
Deferred revenues and allowances |
|
|
1,222 |
|
|
|
1,330 |
|
|
|
1,363 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities |
|
|
111 |
|
|
|
64,184 |
|
|
|
28,664 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from investing activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase of property and equipment |
|
|
(19,619 |
) |
|
|
(18,490 |
) |
|
|
(18,425 |
) |
Proceeds from sales of property |
|
|
1,131 |
|
|
|
34 |
|
|
|
2,278 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities |
|
|
(18,488 |
) |
|
|
(18,456 |
) |
|
|
(16,147 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from financing activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net proceeds from stock issued under employee benefit plans,
including tax benefit |
|
|
1,603 |
|
|
|
2,813 |
|
|
|
2,617 |
|
Excess tax benefits from stock-based compensation |
|
|
59 |
|
|
|
134 |
|
|
|
210 |
|
Purchase of treasury stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,797 |
) |
Borrowings under lines of credit |
|
|
183,930 |
|
|
|
77,150 |
|
|
|
25,200 |
|
Payments on lines of credit |
|
|
(173,430 |
) |
|
|
(87,650 |
) |
|
|
(25,200 |
) |
Increase in debt issuance costs |
|
|
(118 |
) |
|
|
(130 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Borrowings on promissory notes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
136 |
|
|
|
|
|
Payment of promissory notes |
|
|
(60 |
) |
|
|
(32 |
) |
|
|
(153 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities |
|
|
11,984 |
|
|
|
(7,579 |
) |
|
|
(1,123 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impact on cash of consolidation of SRDS |
|
|
478 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net change in cash |
|
|
(5,915 |
) |
|
|
38,149 |
|
|
|
11,394 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beginning of the year |
|
|
12,942 |
|
|
|
7,027 |
|
|
|
45,176 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
End of the year |
|
$ |
7,027 |
|
|
$ |
45,176 |
|
|
$ |
56,570 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash interest paid |
|
$ |
2,387 |
|
|
$ |
635 |
|
|
$ |
366 |
|
Cash income taxes paid, net of refunds |
|
|
19,372 |
|
|
|
13,179 |
|
|
|
28,262 |
|
Cash interest received from interests in securitized assets |
|
|
9,389 |
|
|
|
14,633 |
|
|
|
19,055 |
|
Cash proceeds from new securitizations |
|
|
256,139 |
|
|
|
285,529 |
|
|
|
338,222 |
|
Cash flows from servicing fees |
|
|
15,529 |
|
|
|
18,572 |
|
|
|
20,997 |
|
Supplemental disclosure of non-cash activity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Customer receivables exchanged for interests in securitized assets |
|
|
58,342 |
|
|
|
58,835 |
|
|
|
63,067 |
|
Amounts reinvested in interests in securitized assets |
|
|
(81,652 |
) |
|
|
(76,133 |
) |
|
|
(61,880 |
) |
Purchases of property and equipment with debt financing |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
215 |
|
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
63
CONNS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
January 31, 2007
1. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
Principles of Consolidation. The consolidated financial statements include the
accounts of Conns, Inc. and its subsidiaries, limited liability companies and limited
partnerships, all of which are wholly-owned (the Company). All material intercompany
transactions and balances have been eliminated in consolidation.
The Company enters into securitization transactions to sell its retail installment and
revolving customer receivables. These securitization transactions are accounted for as sales in
accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 140, Accounting for
Transfers and Servicing of Financial Assets and Extinguishment of Liabilities because the Company
has relinquished control of the receivables. Additionally, the Company has transferred such
receivables to a qualifying special purpose entity (QSPE). Accordingly, neither the transferred
receivables nor the accounts of the QSPE are included in the consolidated financial statements of
the Company. The Companys retained interest in the transferred receivables is valued on a
revolving pool basis. See Note 2 for further discussion.
Business Activities. The Company, through its retail stores, provides products and
services to its customer base in six primary market areas, including southern Louisiana, southeast
Texas, Houston, South Texas, San Antonio/Austin, and Dallas, Texas. Products and services offered
through retail sales outlets include major home appliances, consumer electronics, home office
equipment, lawn and garden products, mattresses, furniture, service maintenance agreements,
installment and revolving credit account services, and various credit insurance products. These
activities are supported through an extensive service, warehouse and distribution system. For the
reasons discussed below, the aggregation of operating companies represent one reportable segment
under SFAS No. 131, Disclosures About Segments of an Enterprise and Related Information.
Accordingly, the accompanying consolidated financial statements reflect the operating results of
the Companys single reportable segment. The Companys retail stores bear the Conns name, and
deliver the same products and services to a common customer group. The Companys customers
generally are individuals rather than commercial accounts. All of the retail stores follow the same
procedures and methods in managing their operations. The Companys management evaluates performance
and allocates resources based on the operating results of the retail stores and considers the
credit programs, service contracts and distribution system to be an integral part of the Companys
retail operations.
Use of Estimates. The preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally
accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect
the amounts reported in the financial statements and accompanying notes. Actual results could
differ from those estimates.
Vendor Programs. The Company receives funds from vendors for price protection, product
and volume rebates, marketing, training and promotional programs which are recorded as the amounts
are earned, as a reduction of the related product cost or advertising expense, according to the
nature of the program. The Company accrues rebates based on the satisfaction of terms of the
program even though funds may not be received until the end of a quarter or year. If the programs
are related to product purchases, which would include price protection, and sales and volume
rebates, the allowances, credits, or payments are recorded as a reduction of product cost and are
reflected in cost of goods sold when the related product is sold. If the programs relate to
marketing, training and promotions that are not for reimbursement of specific incremental costs,
the allowances, credits or payments are reflected as a reduction of cost of goods sold. If the
programs are related to promotion or marketing of the product, the allowances, credits, or payments
for reimbursement of specific, incremental, identifiable, advertising-related costs incurred in
selling the vendors products are recorded as a reduction of advertising expense and are reflected
in selling, general and administrative expenses in the period in which the expense is incurred.
64
Earnings Per Share. In accordance with SFAS No. 128, Earnings per Share, the Company
calculates basic earnings per share by dividing net income by the weighted average number of common
shares outstanding. Diluted earnings per share include the dilutive effects of any stock options
granted, which is calculated using the treasury-stock method. The following table sets forth the
shares outstanding for the earnings per share calculations (shares in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended January 31, |
|
|
2005 |
|
2006 |
|
2007 |
Common stock outstanding, beginning of period |
|
|
23,102 |
|
|
|
23,268 |
|
|
|
23,571 |
|
Weighted average common stock issued in stock
option exercises |
|
|
89 |
|
|
|
142 |
|
|
|
111 |
|
Weighted average common stock issued to employee
stock purchase plan
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
Weighted average number of restricted shares forfeited |
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less: Weighted average treasury shares purchased |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(24 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares used in computing basic earnings per share |
|
|
23,192 |
|
|
|
23,412 |
|
|
|
23,663 |
|
Dilutive effect of stock options, net of assumed repurchase
of treasury stock |
|
|
454 |
|
|
|
676 |
|
|
|
626 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares used in computing diluted earnings per share |
|
|
23,646 |
|
|
|
24,088 |
|
|
|
24,289 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
During the periods presented, options with an exercise price in excess of the average market
price of the Companys common stock are excluded from the calculation of the dilutive effect of
stock options for diluted earnings per share calculations. The weighted average number of options
not included in the calculation of the dilutive effect of stock options was 0.1 million, 0.1
million, and 0.2 million for each of the years ended January 31, 2005, 2006, and 2007 respectively.
Cash and Cash Equivalents. The Company considers all highly liquid debt instruments
purchased with a maturity of three months or less to be cash equivalents.
Inventories. Inventories consist of finished goods or parts and are valued at the
lower of cost (moving weighted average method) or market.
Property and Equipment. Property and equipment are recorded at cost. Costs associated
with major additions and betterments that increase the value or extend the lives of assets are
capitalized and depreciated. Normal repairs and maintenance that do not materially improve or
extend the lives of the respective assets are charged to operating expenses as incurred.
Depreciation, which includes amortization of capitalized leases, is computed on the straight-line
method over the estimated useful lives of the assets, or in the case of leasehold improvements,
over the shorter of the estimated useful lives or the remaining terms of the respective leases. The
estimated lives used to compute depreciation expense are summarized as follows:
|
|
|
Buildings
|
|
30 years |
|
Equipment and fixtures
|
|
3 5 years |
|
Transportation equipment
|
|
3 years |
|
Leasehold improvements
|
|
5 10 years |
Property and equipment are evaluated for impairment at the retail store level. The
Company performs a periodic assessment of assets for impairment in the absence of such information
or indicators. Additionally,
an impairment evaluation is performed whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate
that the carrying amount of the assets might not be recoverable. The most likely condition that
would necessitate an assessment would be an adverse change in historical and estimated future
results of a retail stores performance. For property and equipment to be held and used, the
Company recognizes an impairment loss if its carrying amount is not recoverable through its
undiscounted cash flows and measures the impairment loss based on the difference between the
carrying amount and fair value.
65
All gains and losses on sale of assets are included in Other (income) expense in the
consolidated statements of operations.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended January 31, |
(in thousands of dollars) |
|
2005 |
|
2006 |
|
2007 |
Gain (loss) on sale of assets |
|
|
(126 |
) |
|
|
(69 |
) |
|
|
772 |
|
During the year ended January 31, 2007, the Company completed a nonmonetary transaction in an
exchange of real estate assets. As required under Accounting Principles Board No. 29, Accounting
for Nonmonetary Transactions, a gain of $0.7 million was recorded in Other (income) expense.
Receivable Sales and Interests in Securitized Receivables. The Company enters into
securitization transactions to sell customer retail installment and revolving receivable accounts.
In these transactions, the Company retains interest-only strips and subordinated securities, all of
which are retained interests in the securitized receivables. Gain or loss on the sales of the
receivables depends in part on the previous carrying amount of the financial assets involved in the
transfer, allocated between the assets sold and the retained interests, based on their relative
fair value at the date of transfer. Retained interests are carried at fair value on the Companys
balance sheet as available-for-sale securities in accordance with SFAS No. 115, Accounting for
Certain Investments in Debt and Equity Securities. Impairment and interest income are recognized in
accordance with Emerging Issues Task Force (EITF) No. 99-20, Recognition of Interest Income and
Impairment on Purchased and Retained Beneficial Interests in Securitized Financial Assets.
Servicing fees are recognized monthly as they are earned. Gains on sales of receivables, impairment
on retained interests, interest income from retained interests and servicing fees are included in
Finance charges and other in the consolidated statement of operations.
The Company estimates fair value of its retained interest in both the initial
securitization and thereafter based on the present value of future expected cash flows using
managements best estimates of the key assumptionscredit losses, prepayment rates, forward yield
curves, and discount rates commensurate with the risks involved. The Companys retained interest in
the transferred receivables are valued on a revolving pool basis.
Receivables Not Sold. Certain receivables are not eligible for inclusion in the
securitization transactions and are therefore carried on the Companys balance sheet in Accounts
receivable. Such receivables are recorded net of an allowance for doubtful accounts, which is
calculated based on historical losses. Typically, a receivable is considered delinquent if a
payment has not been received on the scheduled due date. Generally, an account that is delinquent
more than 120 days and for which no payment has been received in the past seven months will be
charged-off against the allowance and interest accrued subsequent to the last payment will be
reversed. Interest income is accrued using the Rule of 78s method for installment contracts and
the simple interest method for revolving charge accounts. Typically, interest income is accrued
until the contract or accounts is paid off or charged-off. The Company has a secured interest in
the merchandise financed by these receivables and therefore has the opportunity to recover a
portion of the charged-off value. (See also Note 2.)
Goodwill. Goodwill represents the excess of purchase price over the fair market value
of net assets acquired. The Company assesses the potential future impairment of goodwill on an
annual basis, or at any other time when impairment indicators exist. In fiscal 2005, 2006 and
2007, the Company concluded that goodwill was not impaired based on its annual impairment testing.
Income Taxes. The Company follows the liability method of accounting for income taxes.
Under this method, deferred tax assets and liabilities are determined based on differences between
financial reporting
and tax bases of assets and liabilities and are measured using the tax rates and laws that are
expected be in effect when the differences are expected to reverse.
Revenue Recognition. Revenues from the sale of retail products are recognized at the
time the product is delivered to the customer. Such revenues are recognized net of any adjustments
for sales incentive offers such as discounts, coupons, rebates or other free products or services.
The Company sells service maintenance agreements and credit insurance contracts on behalf of
unrelated third parties. For contracts where third parties are the obligor on the contract,
commissions are recognized in revenues at the time of sale, and in the case of retrospective
commissions, at the time that they are earned. The Company
66
records a receivable for earned but
unremitted retrospective commissions and reserves for future cancellations of service maintenance
agreements and credit insurance contracts estimated based on historical experience. Where the
Company sells service maintenance agreements in which it is deemed to be the obligor on the
contract at the time of sale, revenue is recognized ratably, on a straight-line basis, over the
term of the service maintenance agreement. These Company-obligor service maintenance agreements are
renewal contracts which provide our customers protection against product repair costs arising after
the expiration of the manufacturers warranty and the third-party obligor contracts. These
agreements typically have terms ranging from 12 months to 36 months. These agreements are separate
units of accounting under EITF No. 00-21, Revenue Arrangements with Multiple Deliverables and are
valued based on the agreed upon retail selling price. The amounts of service maintenance agreement
revenue deferred at January 31, 2006 and 2007 were $3.6 million and $3.6 million, respectively, and
are included in Deferred revenue and allowances in the accompanying balance sheets. Under the
renewal contracts, the Company defers and amortizes its direct selling expenses over the contract
term and records the cost of the service work performed as products are repaired.
The classification of the amounts included as Finance charges and other is summarized as
follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended January 31, |
|
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Securitization income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Servicing fees received |
|
$ |
15,529 |
|
|
$ |
18,572 |
|
|
$ |
20,997 |
|
Accretion of gains on sale of receivables |
|
|
24,719 |
|
|
|
26,724 |
|
|
|
23,874 |
|
Impairment recorded on retained interests (1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(895 |
) |
|
|
(1,495 |
) |
Interest earned on retained interests |
|
|
9,389 |
|
|
|
14,633 |
|
|
|
19,055 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total securitization income |
|
|
49,637 |
|
|
|
59,034 |
|
|
|
62,431 |
|
Interest Income from receivables not sold |
|
|
1,224 |
|
|
|
1,181 |
|
|
|
1,274 |
|
Insurance commissions |
|
|
16,101 |
|
|
|
16,672 |
|
|
|
18,394 |
|
Other |
|
|
4,624 |
|
|
|
3,523 |
|
|
|
1,621 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Finance charges and other |
|
$ |
71,586 |
|
|
$ |
80,410 |
|
|
$ |
83,720 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gains on sales of receivables (2) |
|
$ |
29,468 |
|
|
$ |
29,687 |
|
|
$ |
11,997 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The impairment charge in the year ended January 31, 2006, was due to higher
expected credit losses as a result of changes in the bankruptcy-filing laws and the
disruption to our credit operations as a result of Hurricane Rita, which hit the Gulf
Coast in September 2005. The impairment charge in the year ended January 31, 2007, was
due to higher expected credit losses as a result of the continued impact of the
disruption to our credit operations as a result of Hurricane Rita. |
|
(2) |
|
Gains on sales of receivables are recognized as securitization income as
accretion over the lives of the related receivables. The Gains on sales of receivables
for the year ended January 31, 2007, were impacted by the discount recorded on the
Companys investment in the QSPE, as a result of the completion of the new bond
issuance by the QSPE, which resulted in a longer term to maturity. |
Securitization income includes accretion of gains on sales of receivables, impairment of
retained interests, interest income from retained interests and servicing fees. See Receivable
Sales and Interest in Securitized Receivables for revenue recognition policies related to these
components.
The Company offers interest free promotional programs for three- to 24-month contracts
and has recorded interest income only on those contracts that are not expected to make payments
within the time period specified to satisfy the promotional requirements. The Company also offers
24- and 36-month no-interest contracts on which no interest is owed for the term of the contract,
unless the terms of the contract related to periodic payments are not met, in which case interest
accrues at the normal contract rate from that point forward. Other than these promotional programs,
the Company does not extend credit at interest rates other than market rates.
67
The following table sets forth the sales made under the interest free programs (in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended January 31, |
|
|
2005 |
|
2006 |
2007 |
Sales under interest-free programs |
|
$ |
126,575 |
|
|
$ |
159,767 |
|
|
$ |
164,528 |
|
These sales are recognized at the time the product is delivered to the customer, which is
consistent with the above stated policy. Considering the short-term nature of interest free
programs for terms less than one year, sales are recorded at full value and are not discounted.
Sales financed by longer-term (18-, 24- and 36-month) interest free programs are recorded at their
net present value (see Application of APB 21 to Cash Option Programs that Exceed One Year in
Duration below). Receivables arising out of the Companys interest-free programs are securitized
with other qualifying customer receivables.
The Company classifies amounts billed to customers relating to shipping and handling as
revenues. Costs of $16.7 million, $21.0 million and $21.4 million associated with shipping and
handling revenues are included in Selling, general and administrative expense for the years ended
January 31, 2005, 2006 and 2007, respectively.
Fair Value of Financial Instruments. The fair value of cash and cash
equivalents, receivables, and notes and accounts payable approximate their carrying amounts because
of the short maturity of these instruments. The fair value of the Companys interests in
securitized receivables is determined by estimating the present value of future expected cash flows
using managements best estimates of the key assumptions, including credit losses, prepayment
rates, forward yield curves and discount rates commensurate with the risks involved. See Note 2.
The carrying value of the Companys long-term debt approximates fair value due to either the time
to maturity or the existence of variable interest rates that approximate current market rate.
The Company held interest rate swaps and collars with notional amounts totaling
$20 million with terms that extended through April 2005. Those instruments were held for the
purpose of hedging a portion of the variable interest rate risk, primarily related to cash flows
from the Companys interest-only strip as well as its variable rate debt. Hedge accounting was
discontinued for the rate swaps in fiscal 2004. At the time the cash flow hedge designation was
discontinued, the Company began to recognize changes in the fair value of the swaps as interest
expense and amortize the accumulated other comprehensive loss related to those derivatives as
interest expense over the period that the forecasted transactions effected the statement of
operations. During fiscal 2005, the Company reclassified $1.1 million of losses previously recorded
in accumulated other comprehensive losses into the statement of operations and recorded $1.1
million of income into the statement of operations because of the change in fair value of the
swaps. During fiscal 2006, the Company reclassified $0.2 million of losses previously recorded in
accumulated other comprehensive losses into the statement of operations and recorded $0.2 million
of income into the statement of operations because of the change in fair value of the swaps.
Share-Based Compensation. On February 1, 2006, the Company adopted SFAS No. 123R,
Share-Based Payment, using the modified retrospective application transition method. Under the
modified retrospective application transition method, all prior period financial statements have
been adjusted to give effect to the fair-value-based method of accounting for share-based
compensation. The adoption of the statement impacted the financial statements presented as follows:
|
|
|
For the years ended January 31, 2005, 2006 and 2007, Income before income taxes was
reduced by $0.8 million, $1.2 million and $1.7 million, respectively. |
|
|
|
|
For the years ended January 31, 2005, 2006 and 2007, Net income was reduced by $0.6
million, $1.0 million and $1.4 million, respectively. |
|
|
|
|
For the years ended January 31, 2005, 2006, and 2007, Basic earnings per share was
reduced by $.03, $.04, and $.06, respectively. |
|
|
|
|
For the years ended January 31, 2005, 2006, and 2007, Diluted earnings per share was
reduced by $.03, $.04, and $.06, respectively. |
|
|
|
|
For the years ended January 31, 2005, 2006 and 2007, Cash flows from operating
activities were reduced by, and Cash flows from financing activities were increased by,
$0.1, $0.1 and $0.2 million, respectively. |
68
|
|
|
As of January 31, 2006, the Current deferred income tax asset increased $0.3 million,
Additional paid-in capital increased $2.0 million and Retained earnings decreased $1.7
million. |
For stock option grants after our IPO in November 2003, the Company has used the Black-Scholes
model to determine fair value. Share-based compensation expense is recorded, net of estimated
forfeitures, on a straight-line basis over the vesting period of the applicable grant. Prior to the
IPO, the value of the options issued was estimated using the minimum valuation option-pricing
model. Since the minimum valuation option-pricing model does not qualify as a fair value pricing
model under FAS 123R, the Company follows the intrinsic value method of accounting for share-based
compensation to employees for these grants, as prescribed by Accounting Principles Board (APB)
Opinion No. 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees, and related interpretations. The
following table presents the impact to earnings per share as if the Company had adopted the fair
value recognition provisions of SFAS No. 123 (dollars in thousands except per share data):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended January 31, |
|
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Net income available for common stockholders as reported |
|
$ |
30,687 |
|
|
$ |
41,103 |
|
|
$ |
40,311 |
|
Add: Stock-based compensation recorded, net of tax |
|
|
609 |
|
|
|
963 |
|
|
|
1,408 |
|
Less: Stock-based compensation, net of tax,
for all awards |
|
|
(1,017 |
) |
|
|
(1,313 |
) |
|
|
(1,546 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro forma net income |
|
$ |
30,279 |
|
|
$ |
40,753 |
|
|
$ |
40,173 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings per share-as reported: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
$ |
1.32 |
|
|
$ |
1.76 |
|
|
$ |
1.70 |
|
Diluted |
|
$ |
1.30 |
|
|
$ |
1.71 |
|
|
$ |
1.66 |
|
Pro forma earnings per share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
$ |
1.31 |
|
|
$ |
1.74 |
|
|
$ |
1.70 |
|
Diluted |
|
$ |
1.28 |
|
|
$ |
1.69 |
|
|
$ |
1.65 |
|
Percent change: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
|
(1.3 |
)% |
|
|
(0.9 |
)% |
|
|
(0.3 |
)% |
Assumptions used in pricing model: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average risk free interest rates |
|
|
1.8 |
% |
|
|
3.9 |
% |
|
|
4.4 |
% |
Weighted average expected lives in years |
|
|
4.4 |
|
|
|
4.6 |
|
|
|
6.4 |
|
Weighted average volatility |
|
|
30.0 |
% |
|
|
32.0 |
% |
|
|
50.0 |
% |
Expected dividends |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As provided by Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 107, which provides guidance relating to
share-based compensation accounting, the Company has used a shortcut method to compute the weighted
average expected life for the stock options granted in the year ended January 31, 2007. The
shortcut method is an average based on the vesting period and the contractual term. The weighted
average volatility for the year ended January 31, 2007, was calculated using the average historical
volatility of the Companys peer group. As of January 31, 2007, the total compensation cost related
to non-vested awards not yet recognized totaled $8.5 million and is expected to be recognized over
a weighted average period of 3.8 years.
Self-insurance. The Company is self-insured for certain losses relating to group health,
workers compensation, automobile, general and product liability claims. The Company has stop loss
coverage to limit the exposure arising from these claims. Self-insurance losses for claims filed
and claims incurred, but not reported, are accrued based upon the Companys estimates of the
aggregate liability for claims incurred using development factors based on historical experience.
69
Expense Classifications. The Company records Cost of goods sold as the direct cost of
products sold, any related in-bound freight costs, and receiving costs, inspection costs, internal
transfer costs, and other costs associated with the operations of its distribution system. Also
included in Cost of goods sold is an allocation of advertising expense computed at approximately 6%
of the product direct cost. The offset for this allocation is in Selling, general and
administrative expense and is netted with advertising costs along with vendor rebates (see Vendor
Programs above). Advertising costs are expensed as incurred. Advertising expense included in
Selling, general and administrative expense for the years ended January 31, 2005, 2006 and 2007,
was:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended January 31, |
|
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
Gross advertising expense |
|
$ |
27,752 |
|
|
$ |
31,017 |
|
|
$ |
33,680 |
|
Less: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vendor rebates |
|
|
(4,752 |
) |
|
|
(5,793 |
) |
|
|
(7,188 |
) |
Allocation to Cost of goods sold |
|
|
(19,823 |
) |
|
|
(25,531 |
) |
|
|
(29,071 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net advertising expense in
Selling, general and adminstrative expense |
|
$ |
3,177 |
|
|
$ |
(307 |
) |
|
$ |
(2,579 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In addition, the Company records as Cost of service parts sold the direct cost of parts used
in its service operation and the related inbound freight costs, purchasing and receiving costs,
inspection costs, internal transfer costs, and other costs associated with the parts distribution
operation.
The costs associated with the Companys merchandising function, including product
purchasing, advertising, sales commissions, and all store occupancy costs are included in Selling,
general and administrative expense.
Application of APB 21 to Cash Option Programs that Exceed One Year in Duration. In
February 2004, the Company began offering promotional credit payment plans on certain products that
extend beyond one year. In accordance with APB 21, Interest on Receivables and Payables, such
sales are discounted to their fair value resulting in a reduction in sales and receivables, and the
amortization of the discount amount over the term of the promotional credit payment plan. The
difference between the gross sale and the discounted amount is reflected as a reduction of Product
sales in the consolidated statements of operations and the amount of the discount being amortized
in the current period is recorded in Finance charges and other. For the years ended January 31,
2005, 2006 and 2007, Product sales were reduced by $2.4 million, $3.1 million, and $5.3 million,
respectively, and Finance charges and other was increased by $0.9 million, $2.4 million, and $3.4
million, respectively, to effect the adjustment to fair value and to reflect the appropriate
amortization of the discount.
Reclassifications. Certain reclassifications have been made in the prior years financial
statements to conform to the current years presentation. Specifically, Other (income) expense,
which consists of (gain) loss on sales of property and equipment, is now separately detailed.
Previously, these amounts were included in Selling, general and administrative expense.
Restatement. On September 15, 2006, the Company restated its financial statements for
the years ended January 31, 2005 and 2006, to correct for errors in recording interests in
securitized assets, securitization income and related income tax impacts.
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income. The balance of accumulated other comprehensive
income (net of tax) was comprised of $10.5 million and $6.3 million of unrealized gains on
interests in securitized assets at January 31, 2006 and 2007, respectively.
Application of FIN 46. In January 2003, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued
Interpretation No. 46, Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities, An Interpretation of Accounting
Research Bulletin No. 51, or FIN 46. FIN 46 requires entities, generally, to be consolidated by a
company when it has a controlling financial interest through ownership, direct or indirect, of a
majority voting interest in an entity with which it conducts business. The Company evaluated the
effects of the issuance of FIN 46 on the accounting for its leases with Specialized Realty
Development Services, LP (SRDS) and determined that it was
70
appropriate to consolidate the balance
sheet of SRDS with the Company as of January 31, 2004. As of
January 31, 2005, the Company no longer leased any of its facilities from SRDS and therefore
FIN 46 no longer applies and the Company no longer consolidates SRDSs balance sheet or statement
of operations. However, the operations of SRDS are consolidated with those of the Company
commencing on February 1, 2004 through the last effective date of the Companys leases with SRDS of
January 30, 2005. The effect of such consolidation on the Companys Statement of Operations for
the year ended January 31, 2005 was to reduce Selling, general and administrative expense by $0.9
million, increase Interest expense by $0.8 million and reduce Income before income taxes by $0.1
million for Minority interest in limited partnership. The Company had no exposure to losses
incurred by SRDS.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements. In October 2005, FASB Staff Position (FSP) No. 13-1,
Accounting for Rental Costs Incurred during a Construction Period, was issued. This FSP addresses
the accounting for rental costs associated with operating leases that are incurred during a
construction period. It requires that those costs be recognized as rental expense and included in
income from continuing operations. The guidance in this FSP is to be applied to the first reporting
period beginning after December 15, 2005 and states that a lessee shall cease capitalizing rental
costs as of the effective date of the FSP for operating lease arrangements entered into prior to
the effective date of the FSP. The Company implemented the guidance in this FSP as of February 1,
2006, and it did not have a material impact on its financial condition or results of operations.
In February 2006, SFAS No. 155, Accounting for Certain Hybrid Financial Instruments, was
issued. This statement is an amendment of SFAS No. 133, Accounting for Derivative Instruments and
Hedging Activities, and SFAS No. 140, Accounting for Transfers and Servicing of Financial Assets
and Extinguishments of Liabilities-a replacement of FASB Statement No. 125. This statement permits
fair value remeasurement for any hybrid financial instrument that contains an embedded derivative
that would otherwise require bifurcation, clarifies which interest-only strips and principal-only
strips are not subject to the requirements of SFAS No. 133, establishes a requirement to evaluate
interests in securitized financial assets to identify interests that are freestanding derivatives
or that are hybrid financial instruments that contain an embedded derivative requiring bifurcation,
clarifies that concentrations of credit risk in the form of subordination are not embedded
derivatives and amends SFAS No. 140 to eliminate the prohibition on a qualifying special-purpose
entity from holding a derivative financial instrument that pertains to a beneficial interest other
than another derivative financial instrument. This statement is effective for all financial
instruments acquired or issued after the beginning of an entitys first fiscal year that begins
after September 15, 2006. The Company is currently analyzing the impact this statement will have on
its financial condition and results of operations.
In March 2006, SFAS No. 156, Accounting for Servicing of Financial Assets an amendment of FASB
Statement No. 140, was issued. This statement requires an entity to recognize a servicing asset or
liability each time it undertakes an obligation to service a financial asset by entering into a
servicing contract, requires all separately recognized servicing assets and servicing liabilities
to be initially measured at fair value, permits an entity to choose either the amortization method
or fair value measurement method for subsequent measurement of each class of separately recognized
servicing assets, permits, at its initial adoption, a one-time reclassification of
available-for-sale securities to trading securities by entities with recognized servicing rights
and, requires separate presentation of and additional disclosures for servicing assets and
servicing liabilities subsequently measured at fair value. This statement is effective for all
financial instruments acquired or issued after the beginning of an entitys first fiscal year that
begins after September 15, 2006. The Company is currently analyzing the impact this statement will
have on its consolidated results of operations and its financial position.
In February 2006, the FASB Emerging Issues Task Force issued EITF No. 06-3, How Sales Taxes
Collected from Customers and Remitted to Governmental Authorities Should Be Presented in the Income
Statement (That Is, Gross Versus Net Presentation). The Task Force reached a consensus that a
company should disclose its accounting policy (i.e., gross or net presentation) regarding
presentation of taxes within the scope of this Issue. If taxes included in gross revenues are
significant, a company should disclose the amount of such taxes for each period for which an income
statement is presented. The consensus is effective for the first annual or interim reporting
period beginning after December 15, 2006. The disclosures are required for annual and interim
financial statements for each period for which an income statement is
71
presented. The Company has
evaluated the EITF and will disclose its accounting policy regarding the presentation of sales
taxes beginning with the first quarter of fiscal 2008.
In July 2006, FASB Interpretation (FIN) No. 48, Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes, an
interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109, Accounting for Income Taxes, was issued. This
interpretation clarifies the accounting for income taxes by prescribing the minimum recognition
threshold a tax position is required to meet before being recognized in the financial statements.
The interpretation is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2006. The Company is
currently analyzing the impact this statement will have on its financial condition and results of
operations.
In September 2006, SFAS No. 157, Fair Value Measurements, was issued. This statement
clarifies the principle that fair value should be based on the assumptions market participants
would use when pricing an asset or liability. This statement is effective for financial statements
issued for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007, and interim periods within those fiscal
years. The Company is currently analyzing the impact this statement will have on its financial
condition and results of operations.
In September 2006, Staff Accounting Bulletin (SAB) No. 108, Considering the Effects of Prior
Year Misstatements when Quantifying Misstatements in Current Year Financial Statements, was issued.
This bulletin addresses how the effects of prior year uncorrected errors must be considered in
quantifying misstatements in the current year financial statements. This bulletin is effective for
fiscal years ending after November 15, 2006.
In February 2007, SFAS No. 159, The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial
Liabilities, was issued. This statement establishes a fair value option, permitting all entities
the ability to choose to measure eligible items at fair value at specified election dates. The
entity shall report unrealized gains and losses on items for which the fair value option has been
elected in earnings at each subsequent reporting date. This statement is effective for financial
statements issued for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007, and interim periods within
those fiscal years. The Company is currently analyzing the impact this statement will have on its
financial condition and results of operations.
2. Interests in Securitized Receivables
The Company has an agreement to sell customer receivables. As part of this agreement, the
Company sells eligible retail installment contracts and revolving receivable accounts to a QSPE
that pledges the transferred accounts to a trustee for the benefit of investors. The following
table summarizes the availability of funding under the Companys securitization program at January
31, 2007 (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capacity |
|
|
Utilized |
|
|
Available |
|
2002 Series A |
|
$ |
300,000 |
|
|
$ |
128,000 |
|
|
$ |
172,000 |
|
2002 Series B Class A |
|
|
96,000 |
|
|
|
96,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
2002 Series B Class B |
|
|
46,222 |
|
|
|
46,222 |
|
|
|
|
|
2002 Series B Class C |
|
|
17,778 |
|
|
|
17,778 |
|
|
|
|
|
2006 Series A Class A |
|
|
90,000 |
|
|
|
90,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
2006 Series A Class B |
|
|
43,333 |
|
|
|
43,333 |
|
|
|
|
|
2006 Series A Class C |
|
|
16,667 |
|
|
|
16,667 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
610,000 |
|
|
$ |
438,000 |
|
|
$ |
172,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The 2002 Series A program functions as a credit facility to fund the initial transfer of
eligible receivables. When the facility approaches a predetermined amount, the QSPE (Issuer) is
required to seek financing to pay down the outstanding balance in the 2002 Series A variable
funding note. The amount paid down on the facility then becomes available to fund the transfer of
new receivables or to meet required principal payments on other series as they become due. The new
financing could be in the form of additional notes, bonds or other instruments as the market and
transaction documents might allow. The 2002 Series A program, which was increased from $250 million
to $300 million during the year ended January 31, 2007, is divided into two tranches; a $100
million 364-day tranche and a $200 million tranche that matures in August 2011. The 2002 Series B
program (which was non-amortizing for the first four years) matures officially on September 1,
2010, although it is expected that the principal payments, which began in October 2006, will
72
retire
the bonds prior to that date. The 2006 Series A program, which was consummated
in August 2006, is non-amortizing for the first four years and officially matures in April
2017. However, it is expected that the principal payments, which begin in September 2010, will
retire the bonds prior to that date.
The agreement contains certain covenants requiring the maintenance of various financial
ratios and receivables performance standards. Except for a deficiency in the minimum issuer
interest requirement at January 31, 2007, the Issuer was in compliance with the requirements of the
agreement as of January 31, 2007. The minimum issuer interest requirement is calculated based on
information that is not available until after the end of the month. Upon determining the new
minimum issuer interest requirement, the Issuer deposited the collateral necessary to satisfy the
required minimum. This deficiency was cured within the time periods provided and does not limit the
Issuers ability to meet its obligations, including funding the transfer of future receivables
created by the Company. As a result, the occurrence of this deficiency did not result in any
unscheduled amortization requirements for the 2002 Series A, 2002 Series B or 2006 Series A Notes.
As part of the new securitization program, the Company and Issuer arranged for the issuance of a
stand-by letter of credit in the amount of $20.0 million to provide assurance to the trustee on
behalf of the bondholders that funds collected monthly by the Company, as servicer, will be
remitted as required under the base indenture and other related documents. The letter of credit has
a term of one year, and the maximum potential amount of future payments is the face amount of the
letter of credit. The letter of credit is callable, at the option of the trustee, if the Company,
as servicer, fails to make the required monthly payments of the cash collected to the trustee.
Through its retail sales activities, the Company generates customer retail installment
contracts and revolving receivable accounts. The Company enters into securitization transactions to
sell these accounts to the QSPE. In these securitizations, the Company retains servicing
responsibilities and subordinated interests. The Company receives annual servicing fees and other
benefits approximating 4.1% of the outstanding balance and rights to future cash flows arising
after the investors in the securities issued by or on behalf of the QSPE have received from the
trustee all contractually required principal and interest amounts. The Company does not record an
asset or liability related to any servicing obligations because the servicing benefits received are
determined to be just adequate to compensate the Company for its servicing responsibilities. The
investors and the securitization trustee have no recourse to the Companys other assets for failure
of the individual customers of the Company and the QSPE to pay when due. The Companys retained
interests are subordinate to the investors interests. Their value is subject to credit,
prepayment, and interest rate risks on the transferred financial assets.
The fair values of the Companys interest in securitized assets were as follows (in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
January 31, |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Interest-only strip |
|
$ |
25,238 |
|
|
$ |
26,358 |
|
Subordinated securities |
|
|
114,044 |
|
|
|
110,490 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total fair value of interests in securitized assets |
|
$ |
139,282 |
|
|
$ |
136,848 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
73
The table below summarizes valuation assumptions used for each period presented:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended January 31, |
|
|
2005 |
|
2006 |
|
2007 |
Prepayment rates
Primary installment |
|
|
1.5 |
% |
|
|
1.5 |
% |
|
|
1.5 |
% |
Primary revolving |
|
|
3.0 |
% |
|
|
3.0 |
% |
|
|
3.0 |
% |
Secondary installment |
|
|
1.5 |
% |
|
|
1.5 |
% |
|
|
1.5 |
% |
Net interest spread
Primary installment |
|
|
13.3 |
% |
|
|
12.8 |
% |
|
|
12.6 |
% |
Primary revolving |
|
|
13.3 |
% |
|
|
12.8 |
% |
|
|
12.6 |
% |
Secondary installment |
|
|
15.0 |
% |
|
|
14.7 |
% |
|
|
14.2 |
% |
Expected losses
Primary installment |
|
|
3.4 |
% |
|
|
3.0 |
% |
|
|
3.0 |
% |
Primary revolving |
|
|
3.4 |
% |
|
|
3.0 |
% |
|
|
3.0 |
% |
Secondary installment |
|
|
3.4 |
% |
|
|
3.0 |
% |
|
|
3.0 |
% |
Projected expense
Primary installment |
|
|
4.1 |
% |
|
|
4.1 |
% |
|
|
4.1 |
% |
Primary revolving |
|
|
4.1 |
% |
|
|
4.1 |
% |
|
|
4.1 |
% |
Secondary installment |
|
|
4.1 |
% |
|
|
4.1 |
% |
|
|
4.1 |
% |
Discount rates
Primary installment |
|
|
10.0 |
% |
|
|
13.0 |
% |
|
|
13.6 |
% |
Primary revolving |
|
|
10.0 |
% |
|
|
13.0 |
% |
|
|
13.6 |
% |
Secondary installment |
|
|
14.0 |
% |
|
|
17.0 |
% |
|
|
17.6 |
% |
Delinquency and deferral rates
Primary installment |
|
|
10.1 |
% |
|
|
9.3 |
% |
|
|
9.3 |
% |
Primary revolving |
|
|
8.9 |
% |
|
|
7.3 |
% |
|
|
5.5 |
% |
Secondary installment |
|
|
15.3 |
% |
|
|
14.0 |
% |
|
|
14.0 |
% |
74
At January 31, 2007, key economic assumptions and the sensitivity of the current fair
value of the interests in securitized assets to immediate 10% and 20% adverse changes in those
assumptions are as follows (dollars in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Primary |
|
Primary |
|
Secondary |
|
|
Portfolio |
|
Portfolio |
|
Portfolio |
|
|
Installment |
|
Revolving |
|
Installment |
Fair value of interest in securitized assets |
|
$ |
88,490 |
|
|
$ |
12,618 |
|
|
$ |
35,738 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expected weighted average life |
|
1.1 years |
|
1.2 years |
|
1.6 years |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Annual prepayment rate assumption |
|
|
1.5 |
% |
|
|
3.0 |
% |
|
|
1.5 |
% |
Impact on fair value of 10% adverse change |
|
$ |
159 |
|
|
$ |
23 |
|
|
$ |
184 |
|
Impact on fair value of 20% adverse change |
|
$ |
308 |
|
|
$ |
44 |
|
|
$ |
366 |
|
Net interest spread assumption |
|
|
12.6 |
% |
|
|
12.6 |
% |
|
|
14.2 |
% |
Impact on fair value of 10% adverse change |
|
$ |
2,992 |
|
|
$ |
427 |
|
|
$ |
2,385 |
|
Impact on fair value of 20% adverse change |
|
$ |
5,919 |
|
|
$ |
844 |
|
|
$ |
4,656 |
|
Expected losses assumptions |
|
|
3.0 |
% |
|
|
3.0 |
% |
|
|
3.0 |
% |
Impact on fair value of 10% adverse change |
|
$ |
722 |
|
|
$ |
103 |
|
|
$ |
515 |
|
Impact on fair value of 20% adverse change |
|
$ |
1,440 |
|
|
$ |
205 |
|
|
$ |
1,024 |
|
Projected expense assumption |
|
|
4.1 |
% |
|
|
4.1 |
% |
|
|
4.1 |
% |
Impact on fair value of 10% adverse change |
|
$ |
942 |
|
|
$ |
134 |
|
|
$ |
636 |
|
Impact on fair value of 20% adverse change |
|
$ |
1,883 |
|
|
$ |
269 |
|
|
$ |
1,272 |
|
Discount rate assumption |
|
|
13.6 |
% |
|
|
13.6 |
% |
|
|
17.6 |
% |
Impact on fair value of 10% adverse change |
|
$ |
1,180 |
|
|
$ |
168 |
|
|
$ |
808 |
|
Impact on fair value of 20% adverse change |
|
$ |
2,321 |
|
|
$ |
331 |
|
|
$ |
1,584 |
|
Delinquency and deferral |
|
|
9.3 |
% |
|
|
5.5 |
% |
|
|
14.0 |
% |
Impact on fair value of 10% adverse change (1) |
|
$ |
102 |
|
|
$ |
15 |
|
|
$ |
159 |
|
Impact on fair value of 20% adverse change (1) |
|
$ |
193 |
|
|
$ |
28 |
|
|
$ |
313 |
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
For purposes of this analysis, an adverse change is assumed to be a decrease in the
delinquency and deferral rate. A decrease results in a faster repayment of the receivables, which
reduces the fair value of the interest-only strip a greater amount than the resulting increase in
the fair value of the subordinated securities. Since it is assumed that none of the other
assumptions would change, an increase in the delinquency and deferral rate results in an increase
in the fair value, (i.e. losses are not assumed to increase as a result). |
These sensitivities are hypothetical and should be used with caution. As the figures
indicate, changes in fair value based on a 10% variation in assumptions generally cannot be
extrapolated because the relationship of the change in assumption to the change in fair value may
not be linear. Also, the effect of the variation in a particular assumption on the fair value of
the interest-only strip is calculated without changing any other assumption; in reality, changes in
one factor may result in changes in another (i.e. increases in market interest rates may result in
lower prepayments and increased credit losses), which might magnify or counteract the
sensitivities.
75
The following illustration presents quantitative information about the receivables
portfolios managed by the Company (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Principal Amount of |
|
|
Principal Amount Over |
|
|
|
Receivables |
|
|
60 Days Past Due (1) |
|
|
|
January 31, |
|
|
January 31, |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Primary portfolio: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Installment |
|
$ |
380,603 |
|
|
$ |
382,482 |
|
|
$ |
24,934 |
|
|
$ |
24,853 |
|
Revolving |
|
|
41,046 |
|
|
|
53,125 |
|
|
|
1,095 |
|
|
|
1,171 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subtotal |
|
|
421,649 |
|
|
|
435,607 |
|
|
|
26,029 |
|
|
|
26,024 |
|
Secondary portfolio: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Installment |
|
|
98,072 |
|
|
|
133,944 |
|
|
|
9,508 |
|
|
|
11,638 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total receivables managed |
|
|
519,721 |
|
|
|
569,551 |
|
|
|
35,537 |
|
|
|
37,662 |
|
Less receivables sold |
|
|
509,681 |
|
|
|
559,619 |
|
|
|
33,483 |
|
|
|
35,677 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Receivables not sold |
|
|
10,040 |
|
|
|
9,932 |
|
|
$ |
2,054 |
|
|
$ |
1,985 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-customer receivables |
|
|
16,864 |
|
|
|
21,516 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total accounts receivable, net |
|
$ |
26,904 |
|
|
$ |
31,448 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average Balances |
|
|
Credit Charge-offs |
|
|
|
January 31, |
|
|
January 31, (2) |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Primary portfolio: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Installment |
|
$ |
352,315 |
|
|
$ |
371,240 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revolving |
|
|
35,149 |
|
|
|
46,507 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subtotal |
|
|
387,464 |
|
|
|
417,747 |
|
|
$ |
9,852 |
|
|
$ |
13,507 |
|
Secondary portfolio: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Installment |
|
|
83,461 |
|
|
|
116,749 |
|
|
|
1,915 |
|
|
|
3,896 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total receivables managed |
|
|
470,925 |
|
|
|
534,496 |
|
|
|
11,767 |
|
|
|
17,403 |
|
Less receivables sold |
|
|
461,215 |
|
|
|
524,256 |
|
|
|
10,894 |
|
|
|
16,575 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Receivables not sold |
|
$ |
9,710 |
|
|
$ |
10,240 |
|
|
$ |
873 |
|
|
$ |
828 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Amounts are based on end of period balances. |
|
(2) |
|
Amounts represent total credit charge-offs, net of recoveries, on
total receivables. The increased level of credit losses is
primarily a result of the impact on our credit operations of
Hurricane Rita that hit the Gulf Coast during September 2005. |
76
3. Notes Payable and Long-Term Debt
At January 31, 2007, the Company had $48.1 million of its $50 million revolving credit
facility available for borrowings. The amounts utilized under the revolving credit facility
reflected $1.9 million related to letters of credit issued. The letters of credit were issued under
a $5.0 million sublimit provided under the facility for standby letters of credit. Additionally,
there were no amounts outstanding under a short-term revolving bank agreement that provides up to
$8.0 million of availability on an unsecured basis. This unsecured facility matures in June 2007
and has a floating rate of interest, based on Prime, which equaled 8.25% at January 31, 2007.
Long-term debt consists of the following (in thousands, except repayment explanations):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
January 31, |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Revolving credit facility with interest at
variable rates (6.32% at January 31, 2007) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Promissory notes, due in monthly installments |
|
|
136 |
|
|
|
198 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total long-term debt |
|
|
136 |
|
|
|
198 |
|
Less amounts due within one year |
|
|
(136 |
) |
|
|
(110 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amounts classified as long-term |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
88 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The revolving facility is subject to the Company maintaining various financial and
non-financial covenants. In addition, the provisions of the bank credit facility include a $50.0
million limit on the payment of dividends on the Companys common stock and purchase of treasury
stock. As of January 31, 2006 and January 31, 2007, the Company was in compliance with all
financial and non-financial covenants.
The current agreement provides for a revolving facility capacity of $50 million,
with a $5 million letter of credit sublimit and an $8.0 million sublimit for a swingline of credit.
Interest rates are variable and are determined, at the option of the Company, at the Base Rate (the
greater of Agents prime rate or federal funds rate plus 0.50%) plus the Base Rate Margin (which
ranges from 0.00% to 0.50%) or LIBO/LIBOR Rate plus the LIBO/LIBOR Margin (which ranges from 0.75%
to 1.75%). Both the Base Rate Margin and the LIBO/LIBOR Margin are determined quarterly based on a
debt coverage ratio equal to the rolling four-quarter relationship of total debt (including lease
obligations) to earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, amortization and rent. The Company
is obligated to pay a non-use fee on a quarterly basis on the non-utilized portion of the revolving
facility at rates ranging from .20% to .375%. The revolving facility is secured by the assets of
the Company not otherwise encumbered and a pledge of substantially all of the stock of the
Companys present and future subsidiaries and matures in November 2010.
Interest expense incurred on notes payable and long-term debt totaled $1.1, $0.2 and $0.4
million for the years ended January 31, 2005, 2006 and 2007, respectively. The Company capitalized
borrowing costs of $0.3 million during the year ended January 31, 2007. Interest expense included
interest related to SRDS debt, which totaled $0.8 million for the year ended January 31, 2005.
Aggregate maturities of long-term debt as of January 31 in the year indicated are as follows (in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
2008 |
|
$ |
110 |
|
2009 |
|
|
88 |
|
2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
198 |
|
|
|
|
|
77
4. Letters of Credit
The Company utilizes unsecured letters of credit to secure payments due to the QSPE related to
its asset-backed securitization program, deductibles under the Companys insurance programs and
international product purchases. At January 31, 2006 and January 31, 2007, the Company had
outstanding unsecured letters of credit of $13.0 million and $22.7 million, respectively. These
letters of credit were issued under the three following facilities:
|
|
|
The Company has a $5.0 million sublimit provided under its revolving line of credit for
stand-by and import letters of credit. At January 31, 2007, $1.9 million of letters of
credit were outstanding and callable at the option of the Companys insurance carrier if
the Company does not honor its requirement to fund deductible amounts as billed under its
insurance program. |
|
|
|
|
The Company has arranged for a $20.0 million stand-by letter of credit to provide
assurance to the trustee of the asset-backed securitization program that funds collected
by the Company, as the servicer, would be remitted as required under the base indenture
and other related documents. The letter of credit has a term of one year and expires in
August 2007. |
|
|
|
|
The Company obtained a $10.0 million commitment for trade letters of credit to secure
product purchases under an international arrangement. At January 31, 2007, there were
$0.8 million of letters of credit outstanding under this commitment. The letter of credit
commitment has a term of one year and expires in May 2007. |
The maximum potential amount of future payments under these letter of credit facilities is
considered to be the aggregate face amount of each letter of credit commitment, which total $35.0
million as of January 31, 2007.
5. Income Taxes
Deferred income taxes reflect the net effects of temporary timing differences between the
carrying amounts of assets and liabilities for financial reporting purposes and the amounts used
for income tax purposes. Significant components of the Companys net deferred tax assets result
primarily from differences between financial and tax methods of accounting for income recognition
on service contracts and residual interests, capitalization of costs in inventory, and deductions
for depreciation and doubtful accounts, and the fair value of derivatives. The deferred tax assets
and liabilities are summarized as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
January 31, |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Deferred Tax Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for doubtful accounts and warranty and
insurance cancellations |
|
$ |
2,158 |
|
|
$ |
431 |
|
Deferred revenue |
|
|
597 |
|
|
|
590 |
|
Stock-based compensation |
|
|
301 |
|
|
|
606 |
|
Property and equipment |
|
|
2,297 |
|
|
|
3,952 |
|
Inventories |
|
|
772 |
|
|
|
1,177 |
|
Accrued vacation and other |
|
|
1,268 |
|
|
|
1,459 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total deferred tax assets |
|
|
7,393 |
|
|
|
8,215 |
|
Deferred Tax Liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales tax receivable |
|
|
(768 |
) |
|
|
(1,002 |
) |
Interest in securitized assets |
|
|
(4,889 |
) |
|
|
(1,993 |
) |
Goodwill |
|
|
(903 |
) |
|
|
(1,141 |
) |
Other |
|
|
(615 |
) |
|
|
(608 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total deferred tax liabilities. |
|
|
(7,175 |
) |
|
|
(4,744 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Deferred Tax Asset |
|
$ |
218 |
|
|
$ |
3,471 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
78
Income taxes were impacted during the year ended January 31, 2007, by the replacement of the
existing franchise tax in Texas with a taxed based on margin. Taxable margin is generally defined
as total federal tax revenues minus the greater of (a) cost of goods sold or (b) compensation. The
tax rate to be paid by retailer and wholesalers is 0.5% on taxable margin. This change impacted
income tax expense beginning June 1, 2006 and will result in an increase in taxes paid by the
Company, as can be seen in the tables below. Additionally, the acceleration of certain allowance
for doubtful accounts deductions resulted in a decrease in current tax expense and an increase in
deferred tax expense of $1.9 million. The significant components of income taxes were as follows
(in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended January 31, |
|
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Current: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal |
|
$ |
16,100 |
|
|
$ |
23,023 |
|
|
$ |
22,439 |
|
State |
|
|
47 |
|
|
|
25 |
|
|
|
916 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current |
|
|
16,147 |
|
|
|
23,048 |
|
|
|
23,355 |
|
Deferred: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal |
|
|
557 |
|
|
|
(701 |
) |
|
|
(1,013 |
) |
State |
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
(6 |
) |
|
|
(67 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total deferred |
|
|
559 |
|
|
|
(707 |
) |
|
|
(1,080 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total tax provision |
|
$ |
16,706 |
|
|
$ |
22,341 |
|
|
$ |
22,275 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A reconciliation of the statutory tax rate and the effective tax rate for each of the
periods presented in the statements of operations is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended January 31, |
|
|
2005 |
|
2006 |
|
2007 |
U.S. Federal statutory rate |
|
|
35.0 |
% |
|
|
35.0 |
% |
|
|
35.0 |
% |
State and local income taxes, net of federal benefit |
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
1.0 |
|
Non-deductible entertainment, tax-free interest income
and other |
|
|
0.7 |
|
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effective tax rate attributable to continuing operations |
|
|
35.8 |
% |
|
|
35.3 |
% |
|
|
36.1 |
% |
Other |
|
|
(0.5 |
) |
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
|
|
(0.5 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effective tax rate |
|
|
35.3 |
% |
|
|
35.2 |
% |
|
|
35.6 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6. Leases
The Company leases certain of its facilities and operating equipment from outside parties and
from a stockholder/officer. The real estate leases generally have initial lease periods of from 5
to 15 years with renewal options at the discretion of the Company; the equipment leases generally
provide for initial lease terms of three to seven years and provide for a purchase right by the
Company at the end of the lease term at the fair market value of the equipment.
The following is a schedule of future minimum base rental payments required under the
operating leases that have initial non-cancelable lease terms in excess of one year (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Third |
|
|
Related |
|
|
|
|
Years Ended January 31, |
|
Party |
|
|
Party |
|
|
Total |
|
2008 |
|
$ |
17,524 |
|
|
$ |
207 |
|
|
$ |
17,731 |
|
2009 |
|
|
16,083 |
|
|
|
207 |
|
|
|
16,290 |
|
2010 |
|
|
15,324 |
|
|
|
207 |
|
|
|
15,531 |
|
2011 |
|
|
13,896 |
|
|
|
207 |
|
|
|
14,103 |
|
2012 |
|
|
11,118 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,118 |
|
Thereafter |
|
|
44,174 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
44,174 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
118,119 |
|
|
$ |
828 |
|
|
$ |
118,947 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
79
Total lease expense was approximately $15.0 million, $15.7 million and $17.3 million for the
years ended January 31, 2005, 2006 and 2007, respectively, including approximately $0.2 million,
$0.2 million and $0.2 million paid to related parties, respectively. During the year ended January
31, 2005, the Company paid $1.4 million under leases with SRDS. As SRDS was consolidated in the
statement of operations for the year ended January 31, 2005, these payments were characterized as
selling, general and administrative expenses, depreciation expense, interest expense and minority
interest in limited partnership. See Note 1.
Certain of our leases are subject to scheduled minimum rent increases or escalation
provisions, the cost of which is recognized on a straight-line basis over the minimum lease term.
Tenant improvement allowances, when granted by the lessor, are deferred and amortized as
contra-lease expense over the term of the lease.
7. Share-Based Compensation
The Company originally approved an Incentive Stock Option Plan that provided a pool of up
to 3.5 million options to purchase shares of the Companys common stock. Such options are to be
granted to various officers and employees at prices equal to the market value on the date of the
grant. The options vest over three or five year periods (depending on the grant) and expire ten
years after the date of grant. As part of the completion of the IPO in November 2003, the Company
amended the Incentive Stock Option Plan to provide for a total available pool of 2,559,767 options,
adopted a Non-Employee Director Stock Option Plan that included 300,000 options, and adopted an
Employee Stock Purchase Plan that reserved up to 1,267,085 shares of the Companys common stock to
be issued. At the Companys annual meeting on May 31, 2006, amendments to the stock option plans
were approved, which increased the shares available under the Incentive Stock Option Plan to
3,859,767 and increased the shares available under the Non-Employee Director Stock Option Plan to
600,000. On November 24, 2003, the Company issued six non-employee directors 240,000 total options
to acquire the Companys stock at $14.00 per share. On June 3, 2004, the Company issued 40,000
options to acquire the Companys stock at $17.34 per share to a seventh non-employee director. At
January 31, 2007, the Company had 320,000 options available for grant under the Non-Employee
Director Stock Option Plan.
The Employee Stock Purchase Plan is available to a majority of the employees of the Company
and its subsidiaries, subject to minimum employment conditions and maximum compensation
limitations. At the end of each calendar quarter, employee contributions are used to acquire shares
of common stock at 85% of the lower of the fair market value of the common stock on the first or
last day of the calendar quarter. During the year ended January 31, 2005, 2006 and 2007, the
Company issued 8,664, 10,496 and 11,720 shares of common stock, respectively, to employees
participating in the plan, leaving 1,236,205 shares remaining reserved for future issuance under
the plan as of January 31, 2007.
80
A summary of the status of the Companys Incentive Stock Option Plan and the activity during
the years ended January 31, 2005, 2006 and 2007 is presented below (shares in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended January 31, |
|
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercise |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercise |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercise |
|
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Price |
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Price |
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Price |
|
Outstanding, beginning of year |
|
|
1,531 |
|
|
$ |
9.68 |
|
|
|
1,666 |
|
|
$ |
11.50 |
|
|
|
1,626 |
|
|
$ |
16.31 |
|
Granted |
|
|
387 |
|
|
|
17.43 |
|
|
|
343 |
|
|
|
33.88 |
|
|
|
394 |
|
|
|
22.68 |
|
Exercised |
|
|
(162 |
) |
|
|
(8.72 |
) |
|
|
(271 |
) |
|
|
(8.34 |
) |
|
|
(220 |
) |
|
|
(9.43 |
) |
Forfeited |
|
|
(90 |
) |
|
|
(11.07 |
) |
|
|
(112 |
) |
|
|
(17.78 |
) |
|
|
(45 |
) |
|
|
(25.66 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding, end of year |
|
|
1,666 |
|
|
$ |
11.50 |
|
|
|
1,626 |
|
|
$ |
16.31 |
|
|
|
1,755 |
|
|
$ |
18.36 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average grant date fair
value of options granted during the period |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
4.97 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
11.09 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
12.39 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average fair value of options
vested during the period (1) |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
4.77 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
4.82 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
6.88 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options exercisable at end of year |
|
|
712 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
743 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
837 |
|
|
|
|
|
Options available for grant |
|
|
684 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
453 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,404 |
|
|
|
|
|
Intrinsic value of options exercised during the period |
|
$1.2 million |
|
|
|
|
|
$4.8 million |
|
|
|
|
|
$3.9 million |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options Outstanding |
|
Options Exercisable |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
Shares |
|
Average |
|
Weighted |
|
Shares |
|
Average |
|
Weighted |
|
|
Outstanding |
|
Remaining |
|
Average |
|
Exercisable |
|
Remaining |
|
Average |
|
|
January 31, |
|
Contractual |
|
Exercise |
|
January 31, |
|
Contractual |
|
Exercise |
Range of Exercise Prices |
|
2007 |
|
Life in Years |
|
Price |
|
2007 |
|
Life in Years |
|
Price |
$8.21-$10.83 |
|
|
520 |
|
|
|
4.3 |
|
|
$ |
8.55 |
|
|
|
498 |
|
|
|
4.2 |
|
|
$ |
8.44 |
|
$14.00 -$16.49 |
|
|
275 |
|
|
|
6.9 |
|
|
|
14.27 |
|
|
|
149 |
|
|
|
6.9 |
|
|
|
14.15 |
|
$17.73-$17.73 |
|
|
266 |
|
|
|
7.8 |
|
|
|
17.73 |
|
|
|
117 |
|
|
|
7.8 |
|
|
|
17.73 |
|
$22.68-$22.97 |
|
|
389 |
|
|
|
9.8 |
|
|
|
22.68 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
$33.88-$33.88 |
|
|
305 |
|
|
|
8.8 |
|
|
|
33.88 |
|
|
|
73 |
|
|
|
8.8 |
|
|
|
33.88 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
1,755 |
|
|
|
7.3 |
|
|
$ |
18.36 |
|
|
|
837 |
|
|
|
5.6 |
|
|
$ |
12.97 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Aggregate intrinsic value of exercisable options at January 31, 2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
8.8 million |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Aggregate intrinsic value of outstanding options at January 31, 2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
12.1 million |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Does not include pre-IPO options that were valued using the minimum value option-pricing method. |
81
8. Significant Vendors
As shown in the table below, a significant portion of the Companys merchandise purchases
for years ended January 31, 2005, 2006 and 2007 were made from six vendors:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended January 31, |
Vendor |
|
2005 |
|
2006 |
|
2007 |
A |
|
|
14.2 |
% |
|
|
17.0 |
% |
|
|
12.9 |
% |
B |
|
|
3.6 |
|
|
|
7.8 |
|
|
|
12.7 |
|
C |
|
|
13.2 |
|
|
|
12.2 |
|
|
|
12.1 |
|
D |
|
|
13.8 |
|
|
|
11.4 |
|
|
|
7.1 |
|
E |
|
|
8.0 |
|
|
|
7.7 |
|
|
|
7.1 |
|
F |
|
|
5.8 |
|
|
|
6.8 |
|
|
|
5.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Totals |
|
|
58.6 |
% |
|
|
62.9 |
% |
|
|
57.2 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As part of a program to purchase product inventory from vendors overseas, the Company had $0.8
million in obligations under stand-by letters of credit at January 31, 2007.
9. Related Party Transactions
The Company leases one of its stores from its Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the
Board, under the terms of a lease it entered prior to becoming a publicly held company. It also
leased six store locations from Specialized Realty Development Services, LP (SRDS), a real estate
development company that was created prior to the Companys becoming publicly held and was owned by
various members of management and individual investors of Stephens Group, Inc. The Stephens Group,
Inc. is a significant shareholder of the Company. Based on independent appraisals that were
performed on each project that was completed, the Company believes that the terms of the leases
were at least comparable to those that could be obtained in an arms length transaction. As part of
the ongoing operation of SRDS, the Company received a management fee associated with the
administrative functions that were provided to SRDS of $100,000 and $6,500 for the years ended
January 31, 2005 and 2006, respectively. As of January 31, 2005, the Company no longer leased any
properties from SRDS since it divested itself of the leased properties. As part of the divestiture,
SRDS reimbursed the Company $75,000 for costs related to lease modifications. As a result of the
divestiture, the Companys consolidated balance sheet at January 31, 2005 does not include the
accounts of SRDS that were previously consolidated with our financial statements at January 31,
2004. However, the consolidated statements of operations and cash flows for fiscal 2005 include the
operations and cash flows of SRDS through the dates the sales were completed.
The Company engaged the services of Direct Marketing Solutions, Inc. (DMS), for a
substantial portion of its direct mail advertising. DMS, Inc. is partially owned (less than 50%)
by SF Holding Corp., members of the Stephens family,
Jon E. M. Jacoby, and Douglas H. Martin. SF Holding Corp. and the members of the Stephens family are significant shareholders of the
Company, and Messrs. Jacoby and Martin are members of the Companys Board of Directors. The fees
the Company paid to DMS during the fiscal years ended 2005, 2006 and 2007 amounted to approximately
$1.8 million, $4.3 million and $5.8 million, respectively. Thomas J. Frank, the Chief Executive
Officer and Chairman of the Board of Directors owned a small percentage (0.7%) at the end of fiscal
year 2005, but divested his interest during the first half of fiscal year 2006.
The Company engaged the services of Stephens Inc. to act as its broker under its stock
repurchase program. Stephens Inc. is a shareholder of the Company, and Doug Martin, an Executive
Vice President of Stephens Inc., is a member of the Companys Board of Directors. During the year
ended January 31, 2007, the Company incurred fees payable to Stephens Inc. of $5,040 related to the
purchase of 168,000 shares of its common stock. Based on a review of competitive bids received from
various broker candidates, the Company believes the terms of this arrangement are no less favorable
than it could have obtained in an arms length transaction.
82
10. Benefit Plans
The Company has established a defined contribution 401(k) plan for eligible employees who
are at least 21 years old and have completed at least one-year of service. Employees may
contribute up to 20% of their eligible pretax compensation to the plan. The Company will match
100% of the first 3% of the employees contributions and 50% of the next 2% of the employees
contributions. At its option, the Company may make supplemental contributions to the Plan, but has
not made such contributions in the past three years. The matching contributions made by the company
totaled $1.4, $1.6 and $1.8 million during the years ended January 31, 2005, 2006 and 2007,
respectively.
11. Contingencies
Legal Proceedings. The Company is involved in routine litigation incidental to our
business from time to time. Currently, the Company does not expect the outcome of any of this
routine litigation to have a material effect on its financial condition or results of operations.
However, the results of these proceedings cannot be predicted with certainty, and changes in facts
and circumstances could impact the Companys estimate of reserves for litigation.
Insurance. Because of its inventory, vehicle fleet and general operations, the Company has
purchased insurance covering a broad variety of potential risks. The Company purchases insurance
polices covering general liability, workers compensation, real property, inventory and employment
practices liability, among others. Additionally, the Company has umbrella policies with an
aggregate limit of $50.0 million. The Company has retained a portion of the risk under these
policies and its group health insurance program. See additional discussion under Note 1. The
Company has a $1.9 million letter of credit outstanding supporting its obligations under the
property and casualty portion of its insurance program.
Service Maintenance Agreement Obligations. The Company sells service maintenance agreements
under which it is the obligor for payment of qualifying claims. The Company is responsible for
administering the program, including setting the pricing of the agreements sold and paying the
claims. The pricing is set based on historical claims experience and expectations about future
claims. While the Company is unable to estimate maximum potential claim exposure, it has a history
of overall profitability upon the ultimate resolution of agreements sold. The revenues related to
the agreements sold are deferred at the time of sales and recorded in revenues in the statement of
operations over the life of the agreements. The amounts deferred are reflected on the face of the
balance sheet in Deferred revenues and allowances, see also Note 1 for additional discussion.
83
ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE.
None
ITEM 9A. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
In accordance with Rules 13a-15 and 15d-15 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, we have
evaluated, under the supervision and with the participation of management, including our Chief
Executive Officer and our Chief Financial Officer, the effectiveness of the design and operation of
our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the
Exchange Act) as of the end of the period covered by this annual report. Based on that evaluation,
our Chief Executive Officer and our Chief Financial Officer concluded that, as of the end of the
period covered by this annual report, our disclosure controls and procedures were effective in
timely alerting them to material information relating to our business (including our consolidated
subsidiaries) required to be included in our Exchange Act filings.
During the preparation of our consolidated financial statements for the quarter ended July 31,
2006, we identified an issue related to the recording of securitization income. Our internal
review of the issue revealed that we had incorrectly reduced securitization income and the value of
our interests in securitized assets by the amount of future expected credit losses recorded on the
books of the qualifying special purpose entity that owns the receivables. As a result of the error
discussed above and the resulting restatement, management has concluded that a material weakness in
its internal controls over financial reporting existed as of January 31, 2006. Specifically,
controls were not operating effectively to ensure that the proper accounting and corresponding
consolidated financial statement presentation of securitization income and the fair value of
interests in securitized assets was consistent with SFAS No. 140. As a result of this material
weakness, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that our disclosure
controls and procedures were not effective at January 31, 2006. As of the date of this filing, we
have taken the following actions to remediate the material weakness in our internal control over
financial reporting with respect to accounting for securitization transactions:
|
o |
|
improved education and enhanced accounting analysis and reviews designed to ensure that
all relevant personnel involved in the securitization accounting understand and account for
securitization transactions in compliance with SFAS No. 140; and |
|
|
o |
|
a review of our internal financial controls with respect to accounting for
securitization transactions to ensure compliance with SFAS No. 140. |
As a result of the remediation actions taken and the subsequent testing of those actions, we
have concluded that our processes, procedures and controls relating to our accounting under SFAS
No. 140 were effective as of January 31, 2007.
Managements Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting
Please
refer to Managements Report on Internal Control over Financial
Reporting on page 57 of
this report.
Changes in Internal Controls Over Financial Reporting
There have been no changes in our internal controls over financial reporting that occurred in
the quarter ended January 31, 2007, which have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to
materially affect our internal controls over financial reporting.
84
ITEM 9B. OTHER INFORMATION
Retirement of Chief Financial Officer
On March 27, 2007, David L. Rogers announced his retirement as our Chief Financial Officer
effective January 31, 2008, the end of the term of his executive employment agreement. Mr. Rogers
executive employment agreement was amended to provide that it terminates January 31, 2008, without
any termination or severance package as a result of its non-renewal at that time.
Appointment of Chief Financial Officer
Michael J. Poppe (39), currently our Controller and Assistant Chief Financial Officer and
Assistant Treasurer, was appointed to be our Chief Financial Officer effective February 1, 2008.
Mr. Poppe joined us in September 2004 and has served as our Controller and Assistant CFO/Treasurer
since that date. In the 14 years prior to his joining us, Mr. Poppe served in various accounting
and finance positions in public accounting and retail companies, most recently as Vice President
and Corporate Controller of Group 1 Automotive, Inc.. Mr. Poppe spent from January 1997 until May
2004 at Group 1, a New York Stock Exchange listed, Fortune 500 retail company, and was a
member of the founding management team. Mr. Poppe is a certified public accountant and obtained his
BBA in accounting and finance from Texas A&M University in December, 1989. We do not have an
employment agreement with Mr. Poppe. Mr. Poppe will be eligible for bonuses under the terms
approved by the compensation committee of the board and other benefits provided to our executive
officers.
Adoption of Bonus Program
On March 27, 2006, the Compensation Committee of our Board of Directors adopted a cash bonus
program for our 2008 fiscal year. Our named executive officers, as well as certain other executive
officers and certain employees, are eligible to participate in the 2008 bonus program. Below is a
description of the 2008 bonus program, as adopted by our Compensation Committee.
The purpose of the 2008 bonus program is to promote the interests of the Company and its
stockholders by providing key employees with financial rewards upon achievement of specified
business objectives, as well as help us attract and retain key employees by providing attractive
compensation opportunities linked to performance results.
The
Compensation Committee established four bonus levels for its 2008 bonus program: Level 1, Level 2, Level 3 and Level 4. Each of the levels represent the attainment by us of certain
operating pre-tax profit targets established by the Compensation Committee (each, a Profit Goal).
If we do not achieve the Level 1 Profit Goal, each named executive officer, other executive officer
or employee awarded a bonus pursuant to the 2008 bonus program will receive a prorata portion of
the Level 1 Profit Goal, determined by the actual pre tax profit as a percentage of the Level 1
Profit Level.
The bonuses that may become distributable based upon our achievement of the Level 1 through
Level 4 Profit Goals will be distributed by our Chief Executive Officer with approval from the
Compensation Committee.
Our Chief Executive Officer will receive a bonus under the 2008 bonus program that varies
based upon our achievement of the Level 1 through Level 4 Profit Goals. The Level 1 bonus amount
for the Chief Executive Officer was established based upon the Compensation Committees independent
evaluation of his compensation relative effect on the Companys performance. The Level 2 bonus is
16.6% greater than the Level 1 bonus, the Level 3 bonus is 33.33% greater than the Level 1 bonus.
The Level 4 bonus is 50% greater than the Level 1 bonus.
Our named executive officers, excluding our Chief Executive Officer, certain other executive
officers and certain employees will receive a bonus under the 2008 bonus program that varies based
upon our achievement of the Level 1 through Level 4 Profit Goals. The Level 1 bonus amount for each
Participant was established based upon the Compensation Committees independent evaluation of his
or her relative effect on the Companys performance. The Level 2 bonus is generally 31% greater
than the Level 1 bonus, the
85
Level 3 bonus is 64% greater than the Level 1 bonus, and the Level 4 bonus is 100% greater than
the Level 1 bonus.
In addition, we established a contingency bonus pool under the 2008 bonus program that varies
based upon our achievement of the Level 1 through Level 4 Profit Goals and additional funds which
may accrue for exceptional performance beyond the Level 4 Profit Goal. The contingency bonus pool
will be distributed at the discretion of our Chairman and Chief Executive Officer with prior
approval from the Compensation Committee.
Payment of bonuses (if any) is normally made in February after the end of the performance
period during which the bonuses were earned. Except for certain executive officers who have
executive employment agreements, in order to be eligible for a bonus under the 2008 bonus program,
eligible participants must be employed through the end of fiscal year ending January 31, 2008.
Those executive officers who have executive employment agreements with us are entitled to, under
certain situations, a prorata bonus if they resign or are terminated prior to the completion of the
fiscal year ended January 31, 2008.
Bonuses normally will be paid in cash in a single lump sum, subject to payroll taxes and tax
withholdings.
PART III
The information required by Items 10 through 14 is included in our definitive Proxy Statement
relating to our 2007 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, and is incorporated herein by reference.
CROSS REFERENCE TO ITEMS 10-14 LOCATED IN THE PROXY STATEMENT
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Caption in the Conns, Inc. |
|
|
Item |
|
2007 Proxy Statement |
|
|
DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE
OFFICERS AND CORPORATE
GOVERNANCE
|
|
BOARD OF DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE
OFFICERS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
|
|
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF
CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS
AND MANAGEMENT
|
|
STOCK OWNERSHIP OF DIRECTORS,
EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND PRINCIPAL
STOCKHOLDERS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND
RELATED TRANSACTIONS AND
DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE
|
|
CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED
TRANSACTIONS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES
AND SERVICES
|
|
INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS |
86
PART IV
ITEM 15. EXHIBITS AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES.
|
(a) |
|
The following documents are filed as a part of this report: |
|
(1) |
|
The financial statements listed in response to Item 8 of this report are as
follows: |
|
|
|
|
Consolidated Balance Sheets as of January 31, 2006 and 2007 |
|
|
|
|
Consolidated Statements of Operations for the Years Ended January 31, 2005, 2006 and
2007 |
|
|
|
|
Consolidated Statements of Stockholders Equity for the Years Ended January 31, 2005,
2006 and 2007 |
|
|
|
|
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Years Ended January 31, 2006 and 2007 |
|
|
(2) |
|
Financial Statement Schedule: Report of Independent Auditors on Financial
Statement Schedule for the three years in the period ended January 31, 2007; Schedule
II Valuation and Qualifying Accounts. The financial statement schedule should be
read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements in our 2007 Annual
Report to Stockholders. Financial statement schedules not included in this report have
been omitted because they are not applicable or the required information is shown in
the consolidated financial statements or notes thereto. |
|
|
(3) |
|
Exhibits: A list of the exhibits filed as part of this report is set forth in
the Index to Exhibits, which immediately precedes such exhibits and is incorporated
herein by reference. |
87
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
l934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned,
thereunto duly authorized.
|
|
|
|
|
|
CONNS, INC.
(Registrant)
|
|
Date: March 29, 2007 |
/s/ Thomas J. Frank, Sr.,
|
|
|
Thomas J. Frank, Sr. |
|
|
Chairman of the Board and Chief
Executive Officer |
|
|
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been
signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the
dates indicated.
|
|
|
|
|
Signature |
|
Title |
|
Date |
|
|
|
Chairman of the Board and
Chief Executive Officer |
|
|
Thomas J. Frank, Sr.
|
|
(Principal Executive Officer)
|
|
March 29, 2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial and |
|
|
David L. Rogers
|
|
Accounting Officer)
|
|
March 29, 2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Marvin D. Brailsford
|
|
Director
|
|
March 29, 2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jon E. M. Jacoby
|
|
Director
|
|
March 29, 2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bob L. Martin
|
|
Director
|
|
March 29, 2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Douglas H. Martin
|
|
Director
|
|
March 29, 2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Dr. William C. Nylin, Jr.
|
|
Executive Vice Chairman and |
|
|
Dr. William C. Nylin, Jr.
|
|
Chief Operating Officer
|
|
March 29, 2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Scott L. Thompson
|
|
Director
|
|
March 29, 2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
William T. Trawick
|
|
Director
|
|
March 29, 2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Theodore M. Wright
|
|
Director
|
|
March 29, 2007 |
88
EXHIBIT INDEX
|
|
|
Exhibit |
|
|
Number |
|
Description |
|
2
|
|
Agreement and Plan of Merger dated January 15, 2003, by and
among Conns, Inc., Conn Appliances, Inc. and Conns Merger
Sub, Inc. (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 2 to
Conns, Inc. registration statement on Form S-1 (file no.
333-109046) as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on September 23, 2003). |
|
|
|
3.1
|
|
Certificate of Incorporation of Conns, Inc. (incorporated
herein by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to Conns, Inc.
registration statement on Form S-1 (file no. 333-109046) as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
September 23, 2003). |
|
|
|
3.1.1
|
|
Certificate of Amendment to the Certificate of Incorporation
of Conns, Inc. dated June 3, 2004 (incorporated herein by
reference to Exhibit 3.1.1 to Conns, Inc. Form 10-Q for the
quarterly period ended April 30, 2004 (File No. 000-50421) as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on June 7,
2004). |
|
|
|
3.2
|
|
Bylaws of Conns, Inc. (incorporated herein by reference to
Exhibit 3.2 to Conns, Inc. registration statement on Form
S-1 (file no. 333-109046) as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on September 23, 2003). |
|
|
|
3.2.1
|
|
Amendment to the Bylaws of Conns, Inc. (incorporated herein
by reference to Exhibit 3.2.1 to Conns Form 10-Q for the
quarterly period ended April 30, 2004 (File No. 000-50421) as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on June 7,
2004). |
|
|
|
4.1
|
|
Specimen of certificate for shares of Conns, Inc.s common
stock (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to
Conns, Inc. registration statement on Form S-1 (file no.
333-109046) as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on October 29, 2003). |
|
|
|
10.1
|
|
Amended and Restated 2003 Incentive Stock Option Plan
(incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Conns,
Inc. registration statement on Form S-1 (file no. 333-109046)
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
September 23, 2003).t |
|
|
|
10.1.1
|
|
Amendment to the Conns, Inc. Amended and Restated 2003
Incentive Stock Option Plan (incorporated herein by reference
to Exhibit 10.1.1 to Conns Form 10-Q for the quarterly
period ended April 30, 2004 (File No. 000-50421) as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on June 7,
2004).t |
|
|
|
10.1.2
|
|
Form of Stock Option Agreement (incorporated herein by
reference to Exhibit 10.1.2 to Conns, Inc. Form 10-K for
the annual period ended January 31, 2005 (File No. 000-50421)
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on April
5, 2005).t |
|
|
|
10.2
|
|
2003 Non-Employee Director Stock Option Plan (incorporated
herein by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to Conns, Inc.
registration statement on Form S-1 (file no. 333-109046)as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
September 23, 2003).t |
|
|
|
10.2.1
|
|
Form of Stock Option Agreement (incorporated herein by
reference to Exhibit 10.2.1 to Conns, Inc. Form 10-K for
the annual period ended January 31, 2005 (File No. 000-50421)
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on April
5, 2005).t |
|
|
|
10.3
|
|
Employee Stock Purchase Plan (incorporated herein by
reference to Exhibit 10.3 to Conns, Inc. registration
statement on Form S-1 (file no. 333-109046) as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on September 23,
2003).t |
89
|
|
|
Exhibit |
|
|
Number |
|
Description |
|
10.4
|
|
Conns 401(k) Retirement Savings Plan (incorporated herein by
reference to Exhibit 10.4 to Conns, Inc. registration
statement on Form S-1 (file no. 333-109046) as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on September 23,
2003).t |
|
|
|
10.5
|
|
Shopping Center Lease Agreement dated May 3, 2000, by and
between Beaumont Development Group, L.P., f/k/a Fiesta Mart,
Inc., as Lessor, and CAI, L.P., as Lessee, for the property
located at 3295 College Street, Suite A, Beaumont, Texas
(incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.5 to Conns,
Inc. registration statement on Form S-1 (file no. 333-109046)
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
September 23, 2003). |
|
|
|
10.5.1
|
|
First Amendment to Shopping Center Lease Agreement dated
September 11, 2001, by and among Beaumont Development Group,
L.P., f/k/a Fiesta Mart, Inc., as Lessor, and CAI, L.P., as
Lessee, for the property located at 3295 College Street, Suite
A, Beaumont, Texas (incorporated herein by reference to
Exhibit 10.5.1 to Conns, Inc. registration statement on Form
S-1 (file no. 333-109046) as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on September 23, 2003). |
|
|
|
10.6
|
|
Industrial Real Estate Lease dated June 16, 2000, by and
between American National Insurance Company, as Lessor, and
CAI, L.P., as Lessee, for the property located at 8550-A
Market Street, Houston, Texas (incorporated herein by
reference to Exhibit 10.6 to Conns, Inc. registration
statement on Form S-1 (file no. 333-109046) as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on September 23, 2003). |
|
|
|
10.6.1
|
|
First Renewal of Lease dated November 24, 2004, by and between
American National Insurance Company, as Lessor, and CAI, L.P.,
as Lessee, for the property located at 8550-A Market Street,
Houston, Texas (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit
10.6.1 to Conns, Inc. Form 10-K for the annual period ended
January 31, 2005 (File No. 000-50421) as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on April 5, 2005). |
|
|
|
10.7
|
|
Lease Agreement dated December 5, 2000, by and between
Prologis Development Services, Inc., f/k/a The Northwestern
Mutual Life Insurance Company, as Lessor, and CAI, L.P., as
Lessee, for the property located at 4810 Eisenhauer Road,
Suite 240, San Antonio, Texas (incorporated herein by
reference to Exhibit 10.7 to Conns, Inc. registration
statement on Form S-1 (file no. 333-109046) as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on September 23, 2003). |
|
|
|
10.7.1
|
|
Lease Amendment No. 1 dated November 2, 2001, by and between
Prologis Development Services, Inc., f/k/a The Northwestern
Mutual Life Insurance Company, as Lessor, and CAI, L.P., as
Lessee, for the property located at 4810 Eisenhauer Road,
Suite 240, San Antonio, Texas (incorporated herein by
reference to Exhibit 10.7.1 to Conns, Inc. registration
statement on Form S-1 (file no. 333-109046) as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on September 23, 2003). |
|
|
|
10.8
|
|
Lease Agreement dated June 24, 2005, by and between Cabot
Properties, Inc. as Lessor, and CAI, L.P., as Lessee, for the
property located at 1132 Valwood Parkway, Carrollton, Texas
(incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 99.1 to Conns,
Inc. Current Report on Form 8-K (file no. 000-50421) as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on June 29, 2005). |
|
|
|
10.9
|
|
Credit Agreement dated October 31, 2005, by and among
Conn Appliances, Inc. and the Borrowers thereunder, the
Lenders party thereto, JPMorgan Chase Bank, National
Association, as Administrative Agent, Bank of America, N.A.,
as Syndication Agent, and SunTrust Bank, as Documentation
Agent (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.9 to
Conns, Inc. Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (file no.
000-50421) as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on December 1, 2005). |
|
|
|
10.9.1
|
|
Letter of Credit Agreement dated November 12, 2004 by and
between Conn Appliances, Inc. and CAI Credit Insurance Agency,
Inc., the financial institutions listed on the signature pages
thereto, and JPMorgan Chase Bank, as Administrative Agent
(incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 99.2 to Conns
Inc. Current Report on Form 8-K (File No. 000-50421) as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on November 17,
2004). |
90
|
|
|
Exhibit |
|
|
Number |
|
Description |
|
10.9.2
|
|
First Amendment to Credit Agreement dated August 28, 2006 by
and between Conn Appliances, Inc. and CAI Credit Insurance
Agency, Inc., the financial institutions listed on the
signature pages thereto, and JPMorgan Chase Bank, as
Administrative Agent (incorporated herein by reference to
Exhibit 10.1 to Conns Inc. Current Report on Form 8-K (File
No. 000-50421) as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on August 28, 2006). |
|
|
|
10.10
|
|
Receivables Purchase Agreement dated September 1, 2002, by and
among Conn Funding II, L.P., as Purchaser, Conn Appliances,
Inc. and CAI, L.P., collectively as Originator and Seller, and
Conn Funding I, L.P., as Initial Seller (incorporated herein
by reference to Exhibit 10.10 to Conns, Inc. registration
statement on Form S-1 (file no. 333-109046) as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on September 23, 2003). |
|
|
|
10.10.1
|
|
First Amendment to Receivables Purchase Agreement dated August
1, 2006, by and among Conn Funding II, L.P., as Purchaser,
Conn Appliances, Inc. and CAI, L.P., collectively as
Originator and Seller (incorporated herein by reference to
Exhibit 10.10.1 to Conns, Inc. Form 10-Q for the quarterly
period ended July 31, 2006 (File No. 000-50421) as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on September 15, 2006). |
|
|
|
10.11
|
|
Base Indenture dated September 1, 2002, by and between Conn
Funding II, L.P., as Issuer, and Wells Fargo Bank Minnesota,
National Association, as Trustee (incorporated herein by
reference to Exhibit 10.11 to Conns, Inc. registration
statement on Form S-1 (file no. 333-109046) as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on September 23, 2003). |
|
|
|
10.11.1
|
|
First Supplemental Indenture dated October 29, 2004 by and
between Conn Funding II, L.P., as Issuer, and Wells Fargo
Bank, National Association, as Trustee (incorporated herein by
reference to Exhibit 99.1 to Conns, Inc. Current Report on
Form 8-K (File No. 000-50421) as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on November 4, 2004). |
|
|
|
10.11.2
|
|
Second Supplemental Indenture dated August 1, 2006 by and
between Conn Funding II, L.P., as Issuer, and Wells Fargo
Bank, National Association, as Trustee (incorporated herein by
reference to Exhibit 99.1 to Conns, Inc. Current Report on
Form 8-K (File No. 000-50421) as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on August 23, 2006). |
|
|
|
10.12
|
|
Series 2002-A Supplement to Base Indenture dated September 1,
2002, by and between Conn Funding II, L.P., as Issuer, and
Wells Fargo Bank Minnesota, National Association, as Trustee
(incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.12 to Conns,
Inc. registration statement on Form S-1 (file no. 333-109046)
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
September 23, 2003). |
|
|
|
10.12.1
|
|
Amendment to Series 2002-A Supplement dated March 28, 2003, by
and between Conn Funding II, L.P. as Issuer, and Wells Fargo
Bank Minnesota, National Association, as Trustee (incorporated
herein by reference to Exhibit 10.12.1 to Conns, Inc. Form
10-K for the annual period ended January 31, 2005 (File No.
000-50421) as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on April 5, 2005). |
|
|
|
10.12.2
|
|
Amendment No. 2 to Series 2002-A Supplement dated July 1,
2004, by and between Conn Funding II, L.P., as Issuer, and
Wells Fargo Bank Minnesota, National Association, as Trustee
(incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.12.2 to
Conns, Inc. Form 10-K for the annual period ended January
31, 2005 (File No. 000-50421) as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on April 5, 2005). |
|
|
|
10.12.3
|
|
Amendment No. 3 to Series 2002-A Supplement. dated August 1,
2006, by and between Conn Funding II, L.P., as Issuer, and
Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Trustee
(incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.12.3 to
Conns, Inc. Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended July
31, 2006 (File No. 000-50421) as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on September 15, 2006). |
91
|
|
|
Exhibit |
|
|
Number |
|
Description |
|
10.13
|
|
Series 2002-B Supplement to Base Indenture dated September 1,
2002, by and between Conn Funding II, L.P., as Issuer, and
Wells Fargo Bank Minnesota, National Association, as Trustee
(incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.13 to Conns,
Inc. registration statement on Form S-1 (file no. 333-109046)
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
September 23, 2003). |
|
|
|
10.13.1
|
|
Amendment to Series 2002-B Supplement dated March 28, 2003, by
and between Conn Funding II, L.P., as Issuer, and Wells Fargo
Bank Minnesota, National Association, as Trustee (incorporated
herein by reference to Exhibit 10.13.1 to Conns, Inc. Form
10-K for the annual period ended January 31, 2005 (File No.
000-50421) as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on April 5, 2005). |
|
|
|
10.14
|
|
Servicing Agreement dated September 1, 2002, by and among Conn
Funding II, L.P., as Issuer, CAI, L.P., as Servicer, and Wells
Fargo Bank Minnesota, National Association, as Trustee
(incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.14 to Conns,
Inc. registration statement on Form S-1 (file no. 333-109046)
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
September 23, 2003). |
|
|
|
10.14.1
|
|
First Amendment to Servicing Agreement dated June 24, 2005, by
and among Conn Funding II, L.P., as Issuer, CAI, L.P., as
Servicer, and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as
Trustee (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.14.1
to Conns, Inc. Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended July
31, 2005 (File No. 000-50421) as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on August 30, 2005). |
|
|
|
10.14.2
|
|
Second Amendment to Servicing Agreement dated November 28,
2005, by and among Conn Funding II, L.P., as 10.14.2 Issuer,
CAI, L.P., as Servicer, and Wells Fargo Bank, National
Association, as Trustee (incorporated herein by reference to
Exhibit 10.14.2 to Conns, Inc. Form 10-Q for the quarterly
period ended July 31, 2005 (File No. 000-50421) as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on August 30, 2005). |
|
|
|
10.14.3
|
|
Third Amendment to Servicing Agreement dated May 16, 2006, by
and among Conn Funding II, L.P., as Issuer, CAI, L.P., as
Servicer, and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as
Trustee (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.14.3
to Conns, Inc. Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended July
31, 2006 (File No. 000-50421) as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on September 15, 2006). |
|
|
|
10.14.4
|
|
Fourth Amendment to Servicing Agreement dated August 1, 2006,
by and among Conn Funding II, L.P., as Issuer, CAI, L.P., as
Servicer, and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as
Trustee (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.14.4
to Conns, Inc. Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended July
31, 2006 (File No. 000-50421) as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on September 15, 2006). |
|
|
|
10.15.1
|
|
First Amendment to Executive Employment Agreement between
Conns, Inc. and Thomas J. Frank, Sr., Approved by the
stockholders May 26, 2005 (incorporated herein by reference to
Exhibit 10.15.1 to Conns, Inc. Form 10-Q for the quarterly
period ended July 31, 2005 (file No. 000-50421) as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on August 30,
2005).t |
|
|
|
10.16
|
|
Form of Indemnification Agreement (incorporated herein by
reference to Exhibit 10.16 to Conns, Inc. registration
statement on Form S-1 (file no. 333-109046) as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on September 23,
2003).t |
|
|
|
10.17
|
|
Description of Compensation Payable to Non-Employee Directors
(incorporated herein by reference to Form 8-K (file no.
000-50421) filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
on June 2, 2005).t |
92
|
|
|
Exhibit |
|
|
Number |
|
Description |
|
10.18
|
|
Dealer Agreement between Conn Appliances, Inc. and Voyager
Service Programs, Inc. effective as of January 1, 1998
(incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.19 to Conns,
Inc. Form 10-K for the annual period ended January 31, 2006
(File No. 000-50421) as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on March 30, 2006). |
|
|
|
10.18.1
|
|
Amendment #1 to Dealer Agreement by and among Conn Appliances,
Inc., CAI, L.P., Federal Warranty Service Corporation and
Voyager Service Programs, Inc. effective as of July 1, 2005
(incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.19.1 to
Conns, Inc. Form 10-K for the annual period ended January
31, 2006 (File No. 000-50421) as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on March 30, 2006). |
|
|
|
10.18.2
|
|
Amendment #2 to Dealer Agreement by and among Conn Appliances,
Inc., CAI, L.P., Federal Warranty Service Corporation and
Voyager Service Programs, Inc. effective as of July 1, 2005
(incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.19.2 to
Conns, Inc. Form 10-K for the annual period ended January
31, 2006 (File No. 000-50421) as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on March 30, 2006). |
|
|
|
10.18.3
|
|
Amendment #3 to Dealer Agreement by and among Conn Appliances,
Inc., CAI, L.P., Federal Warranty Service Corporation and
Voyager Service Programs, Inc. effective as of July 1, 2005
(incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.19.3 to
Conns, Inc. Form 10-K for the annual period ended January
31, 2006 (File No. 000-50421) as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on March 30, 2006). |
|
|
|
10.18.4
|
|
Amendment #4 to Dealer Agreement by and among Conn Appliances,
Inc., CAI, L.P., Federal Warranty Service Corporation and
Voyager Service Programs, Inc. effective as of July 1, 2005
(incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.19.4 to
Conns, Inc. Form 10-K for the annual period ended January
31, 2006 (File No. 000-50421) as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on March 30, 2006). |
|
|
|
10.19
|
|
Service Expense Reimbursement Agreement between Affiliates
Insurance Agency, Inc. and American Bankers Life Assurance
Company of Florida, American Bankers Insurance Company
Ranchers & Farmers County Mutual Insurance Company, Voyager
Life Insurance Company and Voyager Property and Casualty
Insurance Company effective July 1, 1998 (incorporated herein
by reference to Exhibit 10.20 to Conns, Inc. Form 10-K for
the annual period ended January 31, 2006 (File No. 000-50421)
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March
30, 2006). |
|
|
|
10.19.1
|
|
First Amendment to Service Expense Reimbursement Agreement by
and among CAI, L.P., Affiliates Insurance Agency, Inc.,
American Bankers Life Assurance Company of Florida, Voyager
Property & Casualty Insurance Company, American Bankers Life
Assurance Company of Florida, American Bankers Insurance
Company of Florida and American Bankers General Agency, Inc.
effective July 1, 2005 (incorporated herein by reference to
Exhibit 10.20.1 to Conns, Inc. Form 10-K for the annual
period ended January 31, 2006 (File No. 000-50421) as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 30,
2006). |
|
|
|
10.20
|
|
Service Expense Reimbursement Agreement between CAI Credit Insurance Agency, Inc. and American
Bankers Life Assurance Company of Florida, American Bankers Insurance Company Ranchers & Farmers
County Mutual Insurance Company, Voyager Life Insurance Company and Voyager Property and Casualty
Insurance Company effective July 1, 1998 (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.21 to
Conns, Inc. Form 10-K for the annual period ended January 31, 2006 (File No. 000-50421) as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 30, 2006). |
|
|
|
10.20.1
|
|
First Amendment to Service Expense Reimbursement Agreement by and among CAI Credit Insurance Agency,
Inc., American Bankers Life Assurance Company of Florida, Voyager Property & Casualty Insurance
Company, American Bankers Life Assurance Company of Florida, American Bankers Insurance Company of
Florida, American Reliable Insurance Company, and American Bankers General Agency, Inc. effective
July 1, 2005 (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.21.1 to Conns, Inc. Form 10-K for the
annual period ended January 31, 2006 (File No. 000-50421) as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on March 30, 2006). |
93
|
|
|
Exhibit |
|
|
Number |
|
Description |
|
10.21
|
|
Consolidated Addendum and Amendment to Service Expense Reimbursement Agreements by and among Certain
Member Companies of Assurant Solutions, CAI Credit Insurance Agency, Inc. and Affiliates Insurance
Agency, Inc. effective April 1, 2004 (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.22 to Conns,
Inc. Form 10-K for the annual period ended January 31, 2006 (File No. 000-50421) as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on March 30, 2006). |
|
|
|
10.22
|
|
Series 2006-A Supplement to Base Indenture, dated August 1, 2006, by and between Conn Funding II,
L.P., as Issuer, and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Trustee (incorporated herein by
reference to Exhibit 10.23 to Conns, Inc. Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended July 31, 2006
(File No. 000-50421) as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on September 15, 2006). |
|
|
|
10.23
|
|
Fourth Amended and Restated Subordination and Priority Agreement, dated August 31, 2006, by and among
Bank of America, N.A. and JPMorgan Chase Bank, as Agent, and Conn Appliances, Inc. and/or its
subsidiary CAI, L.P (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.24 to Conns, Inc. Form 10-Q for
the quarterly period ended October 31, 2006 (File No. 000-50421) as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on November 30, 2006). |
|
|
|
10.23.1
|
|
Fourth Amended and Restated Security Agreement, dated August 31, 2006, by and among Conn Appliances,
Inc. and CAI, L.P. and Bank of America, N.A (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.24.1 to
Conns, Inc. Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended October 31, 2006 (File No. 000-50421) as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on November 30, 2006). |
|
|
|
10.24
|
|
Letter of Credit and Reimbursement Agreement, dated September 1, 2002, by and among CAI, L.P., Conn
Funding II, L.P. and SunTrust Bank (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.25 to Conns, Inc.
Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended October 31, 2006 (File No. 000-50421) as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on November 30, 2006). |
|
|
|
10.24.1
|
|
Amendment to Standby Letter of Credit dated August 23, 2006, by and among CAI, L.P., Conn Funding II,
L.P. and SunTrust Bank (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.25.1 to Conns, Inc. Form 10-Q
for the quarterly period ended October 31, 2006 (File No. 000-50421) as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on November 30, 2006). |
|
|
|
10.24.2
|
|
Amendment to Standby Letter of Credit dated September 20, 2006, by and among CAI, L.P., Conn Funding
II, L.P. and SunTrust Bank (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.25.2 to Conns, Inc. Form
10-Q for the quarterly period ended October 31, 2006 (File No. 000-50421) as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on November 30, 2006). |
|
|
|
11.1
|
|
Statement re: computation of earnings per share is included under Note 1 to the financial statements. |
|
|
|
21
|
|
Subsidiaries of Conns, Inc. (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 21 to Conns, Inc.
registration statement on Form S-1 (file no. 333-109046) as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on September 23, 2003). |
|
|
|
23.1
|
|
Consent of Ernst & Young LLP (filed herewith). |
|
|
|
31.1
|
|
Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification (Chief Executive Officer) (filed herewith). |
|
|
|
31.2
|
|
Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification (Chief Financial Officer) (filed herewith). |
|
|
|
32.1
|
|
Section 1350 Certification (Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer) (furnished herewith). |
|
|
|
99.1
|
|
Subcertification by Chief Operating Officer in support of Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification
(Chief Executive Officer) (filed herewith). |
|
|
|
99.2
|
|
Subcertification by Treasurer in support of Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification (Chief Financial
Officer) (filed herewith). |
|
|
|
99.3
|
|
Subcertification by Secretary in support of Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification (Chief Financial
Officer) (filed herewith). |
|
|
|
99.4
|
|
Subcertification of Chief Operating Officer, Treasurer and Secretary in support of Section 1350
Certifications (Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer) (furnished herewith). |
|
|
|
t |
|
Management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement. |
94
Schedule II-Valuation and Qualifying Accounts
Conns, Inc.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Col A |
|
Col B |
|
Col C |
|
Col D |
|
Col E |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Charged to |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at |
|
Charged to |
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at |
|
|
Beginning of |
|
Costs and |
|
Accounts- |
|
Deductions- |
|
End of |
Description |
|
Period |
|
Expenses |
|
Describe |
|
Describe1 |
|
Period |
Year ended January 31, 2005 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reserves and allowances from asset accounts: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for doubtful accounts |
|
|
1,919 |
|
|
|
2,589 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,297 |
) |
|
|
2,211 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended January 31, 2006 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reserves and allowances from asset accounts: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for doubtful accounts |
|
|
2,211 |
|
|
|
1,133 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,430 |
) |
|
|
914 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended January 31, 2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reserves and allowances from asset accounts: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for doubtful accounts |
|
|
914 |
|
|
|
1,476 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,569 |
) |
|
|
821 |
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
Uncollectible accounts written off, net of recoveries |