QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
Delaware | 38-1794485 | |
(State or Other Jurisdiction of Incorporation) |
(IRS Employer Identification No.) |
|
21001 Van Born Road, Taylor, Michigan | 48180 | |
(Address of Principal Executive Offices) | (Zip Code) |
Large accelerated filer þ | Accelerated filer o | Non-accelerated filer o | Smaller reporting company o | |||
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company) |
Class | Shares Outstanding at October 26, 2010 | |
Common stock, par value $1.00 per share | 358,500,000 |
Page No. | ||||||||
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION |
||||||||
Item 1. Financial Statements: |
||||||||
1 | ||||||||
2 | ||||||||
3 | ||||||||
4-24 | ||||||||
25-31 | ||||||||
32 | ||||||||
33-35 | ||||||||
EX-10 | ||||||||
EX-12 | ||||||||
EX-31.A | ||||||||
EX-31.B | ||||||||
EX-32 | ||||||||
EX-101 INSTANCE DOCUMENT | ||||||||
EX-101 SCHEMA DOCUMENT | ||||||||
EX-101 CALCULATION LINKBASE DOCUMENT | ||||||||
EX-101 LABELS LINKBASE DOCUMENT | ||||||||
EX-101 PRESENTATION LINKBASE DOCUMENT | ||||||||
EX-101 DEFINITION LINKBASE DOCUMENT |
September 30, | December 31, | |||||||
2010 | 2009 | |||||||
ASSETS |
||||||||
Current assets: |
||||||||
Cash and cash investments |
$ | 1,537 | $ | 1,413 | ||||
Receivables |
1,106 | 983 | ||||||
Prepaid expenses and other |
288 | 312 | ||||||
Inventories: |
||||||||
Finished goods |
431 | 405 | ||||||
Raw material |
268 | 247 | ||||||
Work in process |
103 | 91 | ||||||
802 | 743 | |||||||
Total current assets |
3,733 | 3,451 | ||||||
Property and equipment, net |
1,838 | 1,981 | ||||||
Goodwill |
3,098 | 3,108 | ||||||
Other intangible assets, net |
282 | 290 | ||||||
Other assets |
302 | 345 | ||||||
Total assets |
$ | 9,253 | $ | 9,175 | ||||
LIABILITIES |
||||||||
Current liabilities: |
||||||||
Notes payable |
$ | 66 | $ | 364 | ||||
Accounts payable |
650 | 578 | ||||||
Accrued liabilities |
842 | 839 | ||||||
Total current liabilities |
1,558 | 1,781 | ||||||
Long-term debt |
4,036 | 3,604 | ||||||
Deferred income taxes and other |
959 | 973 | ||||||
Total liabilities |
6,553 | 6,358 | ||||||
Commitments and contingencies |
||||||||
EQUITY |
||||||||
Masco Corporations shareholders equity: |
||||||||
Common shares, par value $1 per share
Authorized shares: 1,400,000,000; issued
and outstanding: 2010 348,400,000; 2009
350,400,000 |
348 | 350 | ||||||
Preferred shares authorized: 1,000,000; issued
and outstanding: 2010 None; 2009 None |
| | ||||||
Paid-in capital |
36 | 42 | ||||||
Retained earnings |
1,782 | 1,871 | ||||||
Accumulated other comprehensive income |
339 | 366 | ||||||
Total Masco Corporations shareholders
equity |
2,505 | 2,629 | ||||||
Noncontrolling interest |
195 | 188 | ||||||
Total equity |
2,700 | 2,817 | ||||||
Total liabilities and equity |
$ | 9,253 | $ | 9,175 | ||||
1
Three Months Ended | Nine Months Ended | |||||||||||||||
September 30, | September 30, | |||||||||||||||
2010 | 2009 | 2010 | 2009 | |||||||||||||
Net sales |
$ | 1,957 | $ | 2,084 | $ | 5,857 | $ | 5,894 | ||||||||
Cost of sales |
1,463 | 1,517 | 4,325 | 4,371 | ||||||||||||
Gross profit |
494 | 567 | 1,532 | 1,523 | ||||||||||||
Selling, general and administrative expenses |
392 | 429 | 1,233 | 1,263 | ||||||||||||
Charge for defined-benefit plan curtailment |
| | | 8 | ||||||||||||
Operating profit |
102 | 138 | 299 | 252 | ||||||||||||
Other income (expense), net: |
||||||||||||||||
Interest expense |
(63 | ) | (56 | ) | (188 | ) | (169 | ) | ||||||||
Impairment charge for financial investments |
| | (33 | ) | (10 | ) | ||||||||||
Other, net |
(1 | ) | 7 | (2 | ) | 22 | ||||||||||
(64 | ) | (49 | ) | (223 | ) | (157 | ) | |||||||||
Income from continuing operations
before income taxes |
38 | 89 | 76 | 95 | ||||||||||||
Income tax expense |
31 | 26 | 53 | 35 | ||||||||||||
Income from continuing operations |
7 | 63 | 23 | 60 | ||||||||||||
Loss from discontinued operations, net |
| (23 | ) | | (31 | ) | ||||||||||
Net income |
7 | 40 | 23 | 29 | ||||||||||||
Less: Net income attributable to
noncontrolling interest |
12 | 12 | 32 | 27 | ||||||||||||
Net (loss) income attributable to Masco
Corporation |
$ | (5 | ) | $ | 28 | $ | (9 | ) | $ | 2 | ||||||
Earnings (loss) per common share attributable
to Masco Corporation: |
||||||||||||||||
Basic: |
||||||||||||||||
(Loss) income from continuing operations |
$ | (.02 | ) | $ | .14 | $ | (.03 | ) | $ | .09 | ||||||
Loss from discontinued operations, net |
| (.06 | ) | | (.09 | ) | ||||||||||
Net (loss) income |
$ | (.02 | ) | $ | .08 | $ | (.03 | ) | $ | .00 | ||||||
Diluted: |
||||||||||||||||
(Loss) income from continuing operations |
$ | (.02 | ) | $ | .14 | $ | (.03 | ) | $ | .09 | ||||||
Loss from discontinued operations, net |
| (.06 | ) | | (.09 | ) | ||||||||||
Net (loss) income |
$ | (.02 | ) | $ | .08 | $ | (.03 | ) | $ | .00 | ||||||
Amounts attributable to Masco Corporation: |
||||||||||||||||
(Loss) income from continuing operations |
$ | (5 | ) | $ | 51 | $ | (9 | ) | $ | 33 | ||||||
Loss from discontinued operations, net |
| (23 | ) | | (31 | ) | ||||||||||
Net (loss) income |
$ | (5 | ) | $ | 28 | $ | (9 | ) | $ | 2 | ||||||
2
Nine Months Ended | ||||||||
September 30, | ||||||||
2010 | 2009 | |||||||
CASH FLOWS FROM (FOR) OPERATING ACTIVITIES: |
||||||||
Cash provided by operations |
$ | 333 | $ | 384 | ||||
Increase in receivables |
(136 | ) | (187 | ) | ||||
(Increase) decrease in inventories |
(64 | ) | 149 | |||||
Increase in accounts payable and accrued
liabilities, net |
103 | 69 | ||||||
Net cash from operating activities |
236 | 415 | ||||||
CASH FLOWS FROM (FOR) FINANCING ACTIVITIES: |
||||||||
Increase in debt |
2 | 4 | ||||||
Payment of debt |
(3 | ) | (12 | ) | ||||
Issuance of Notes, net of issuance costs |
494 | | ||||||
Retirement of Notes |
(359 | ) | | |||||
Purchase of Company common stock |
(45 | ) | (11 | ) | ||||
Cash dividends paid |
(81 | ) | (139 | ) | ||||
Dividend payment to noncontrolling interest |
(15 | ) | (16 | ) | ||||
Credit Agreement costs |
(9 | ) | | |||||
Net cash for financing activities |
(16 | ) | (174 | ) | ||||
CASH FLOWS FROM (FOR) INVESTING ACTIVITIES: |
||||||||
Capital expenditures |
(88 | ) | (70 | ) | ||||
Proceeds from disposition of: |
||||||||
Marketable securities |
5 | 4 | ||||||
Other financial investments, net |
6 | 2 | ||||||
Businesses, net of cash disposed |
| 3 | ||||||
Property and equipment |
16 | 20 | ||||||
Acquisition of businesses, net of cash acquired |
| (8 | ) | |||||
Other, net |
(26 | ) | (25 | ) | ||||
Net cash for investing activities |
(87 | ) | (74 | ) | ||||
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash
investments |
(9 | ) | 4 | |||||
CASH AND CASH INVESTMENTS: |
||||||||
Increase for the period |
124 | 171 | ||||||
At January 1 |
1,413 | 1,028 | ||||||
At September 30 |
$ | 1,537 | $ | 1,199 | ||||
3
A. | In the opinion of the Company, the accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements contain all adjustments, of a normal recurring nature, necessary to present fairly its financial position as at September 30, 2010 and the results of operations for the three months and nine months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009 and cash flows for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009. The condensed consolidated balance sheet at December 31, 2009 was derived from audited financial statements. |
Certain prior-year amounts have been reclassified to conform to the 2010 presentation in the condensed consolidated financial statements. The results of operations related to 2009 discontinued operations have been separately stated in the accompanying condensed consolidated statements of income for the three months and nine months ended September 30, 2009. In the Companys condensed consolidated statements of cash flows for the nine months ended September 30, 2009, cash flows of discontinued operations are not separately classified. |
Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements |
Effective January 1, 2010, the Company adopted new FASB guidance regarding how a company determines when an entity is insufficiently capitalized or is not controlled through voting and should be consolidated. The adoption of this guidance did not have any impact on the Companys consolidated financial condition and results of operations. |
B. | The Company has accounted for 2009 dispositions as discontinued operations. | |
Selected financial information for these discontinued operations was as follows, in millions: |
Three Months Ended | Nine Months Ended | |||||||
September 30, 2009 | September 30, 2009 | |||||||
Net sales |
$ | 13 | $ | 57 | ||||
Loss from discontinued
operations |
$ | (2 | ) | $ | (11 | ) | ||
Loss on disposal of
discontinued operations |
(22 | ) | (21 | ) | ||||
Loss before income tax |
(24 | ) | (32 | ) | ||||
Income tax benefit |
1 | 1 | ||||||
Loss from discontinued
operations, net |
$ | (23 | ) | $ | (31 | ) | ||
4
C. | The changes in the carrying amount of goodwill for the nine months ended September 30, 2010, by segment, were as follows, in millions: |
Gross Goodwill | Accumulated | Net Goodwill | ||||||||||
At | Impairment | At | ||||||||||
Sep. 30, 2010 | Losses | Sep. 30, 2010 | ||||||||||
Cabinets and Related
Products |
$ | 588 | $ | (364 | ) | $ | 224 | |||||
Plumbing Products |
539 | (340 | ) | 199 | ||||||||
Installation and Other
Services |
1,819 | (51 | ) | 1,768 | ||||||||
Decorative Architectural
Products |
294 | | 294 | |||||||||
Other Specialty Products |
980 | (367 | ) | 613 | ||||||||
Total |
$ | 4,220 | $ | (1,122 | ) | $ | 3,098 | |||||
Gross Goodwill | Accumulated | Net Goodwill | ||||||||||||||||||
At | Impairment | At | At | |||||||||||||||||
Dec. 31, 2009 | Losses | Dec. 31, 2009 | Other(A) | Sep. 30, 2010 | ||||||||||||||||
Cabinets and Related
Products |
$ | 590 | $ | (364 | ) | $ | 226 | $ | (2 | ) | $ | 224 | ||||||||
Plumbing Products |
547 | (340 | ) | 207 | (8 | ) | 199 | |||||||||||||
Installation and Other
Services |
1,819 | (51 | ) | 1,768 | | 1,768 | ||||||||||||||
Decorative Architectural
Products |
294 | | 294 | | 294 | |||||||||||||||
Other Specialty Products |
980 | (367 | ) | 613 | | 613 | ||||||||||||||
Total |
$ | 4,230 | $ | (1,122 | ) | $ | 3,108 | $ | (10 | ) | $ | 3,098 | ||||||||
(A) | Other principally includes the effect of foreign currency translation. |
Other indefinite-lived intangible assets were $195 million and $196 million at September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively, and principally included registered trademarks. The carrying value of the Companys definite-lived intangible assets was $87 million (net of accumulated amortization of $73 million) at September 30, 2010 and $94 million (net of accumulated amortization of $67 million) at December 31, 2009, and principally included customer relationships and non-compete agreements. |
5
D. | Depreciation and amortization expense was $209 million and $190 million, respectively, for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009. | |
E. | The Company has maintained investments in available-for-sale securities and a number of private equity funds, principally as part of its tax planning strategies, as any gains enhance the utilization of any current and future tax capital losses. Financial investments included in other assets were as follows, in millions: |
September 30, | December 31, | |||||||
2010 | 2009 | |||||||
Asahi Tec Corporation preferred stock |
$ | 10 | $ | 71 | ||||
Auction rate securities |
22 | 22 | ||||||
TriMas Corporation common stock |
36 | 17 | ||||||
Total recurring investments |
68 | 110 | ||||||
Private equity funds |
115 | 123 | ||||||
Other investments |
9 | 9 | ||||||
Total non-recurring investments |
124 | 132 | ||||||
Total |
$ | 192 | $ | 242 | ||||
The Companys investments in available-for-sale securities at September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009 were as follows, in millions: |
Pre-tax | ||||||||||||||||
Unrealized | Unrealized | Recorded | ||||||||||||||
Cost Basis | Gains | Losses | Basis | |||||||||||||
September 30, 2010 |
$ | 35 | $ | 35 | $ | 2 | $ | 68 | ||||||||
December 31, 2009 |
$ | 71 | $ | 39 | $ | | $ | 110 |
6
Recurring Fair Value Measurements. Financial assets and (liabilities) measured at fair value on a recurring basis at each reporting period and the amounts for each level within the fair value hierarchy were as follows, in millions: |
Fair Value Measurements Using | ||||||||||||||||
Significant | ||||||||||||||||
Quoted | Other | Significant | ||||||||||||||
Market | Observable | Unobservable | ||||||||||||||
Sep. 30, | Prices | Inputs | Inputs | |||||||||||||
2010 | (Level 1) | (Level 2) | (Level 3) | |||||||||||||
Asahi Tec Corporation: |
||||||||||||||||
Preferred stock |
$ | 10 | $ | | $ | 10 | $ | | ||||||||
Auction rate securities |
22 | | | 22 | ||||||||||||
TriMas Corporation |
36 | 36 | | | ||||||||||||
Total |
$ | 68 | $ | 36 | $ | 10 | $ | 22 | ||||||||
Fair Value Measurements Using | ||||||||||||||||
Significant | ||||||||||||||||
Quoted | Other | Significant | ||||||||||||||
Market | Observable | Unobservable | ||||||||||||||
Dec. 31, | Prices | Inputs | Inputs | |||||||||||||
2009 | (Level 1) | (Level 2) | (Level 3) | |||||||||||||
Asahi Tec Corporation: |
||||||||||||||||
Preferred stock |
$ | 71 | $ | | $ | | $ | 71 | ||||||||
Auction rate securities |
22 | | | 22 | ||||||||||||
TriMas Corporation |
17 | 17 | | | ||||||||||||
Total |
$ | 110 | $ | 17 | $ | | $ | 93 | ||||||||
The Company did not have any transfers between Level 1 and Level 2 financial assets in the first nine months of 2010 or in the full-year 2009. |
The fair value of the auction rate securities held by the Company have been estimated, on a recurring basis, using a discounted cash flow model (Level 3 input). The significant inputs in the discounted cash flow model used to value the auction rate securities include: expected maturity of auction rate securities, discount rate used to determine the present value of expected cash flows (approximately four percent and six percent at September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively) and the assumptions for credit defaults, since the auction rate securities are backed by credit default swap agreements. |
7
During the second quarter of 2010, Asahi Tec approached the Company with an offer to amend the terms of the preferred stock held by the Company. The request was made by Asahi Tec in order to facilitate early negotiations with their bank group for debt that matures in early 2011. The Company and Asahi Tec agreed to amend the preferred stock to include a more favorable conversion feature into common stock and to include a mandatory conversion date of February 28, 2011. The Company agreed to this amendment based on favorable tax benefits related to the Asahi Tec investment. Prior to this amendment, the Company could have settled in cash or common stock in 2017. As a result of the amendment, the Company recognized a $28 million impairment loss based on the current fair value of the preferred stock on an if-converted basis at June 30, 2010. Also, as a result of the amendment, the Company reversed an unrealized gain of $23 million that was previously included in accumulated other comprehensive income. On a quarterly basis, the Asahi Tec Preferred Stock will now be valued based on the trading price of the Asahi Tec common stock (Level 2 input). During the third quarter of 2010, the Company converted and sold $8 million of its investment in Asahi Tec and recognized a loss on the sale of $3 million for the three months ended September 30, 2010. |
In the past, the preferred stock of Asahi Tec was valued primarily using a discounted cash flow model, because there were previously no observable prices in an active market for the same or similar securities. The significant inputs in the discounted cash flow model previously used to value the Asahi Tec preferred stock included: the present value of future dividends, present value of redemption rights, fair value of conversion rights and the discount rate based on credit spreads for Japanese-issued preferred securities (approximately 600 basis points at December 31, 2009) and other market factors. |
The following table summarizes the changes in Level 3 financial assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 and the year ended December 31, 2009, in millions: |
Asahi Tec | Auction Rate | |||||||||||
Preferred Stock | Securities | Total | ||||||||||
Fair value January 1, 2010 |
$ | 71 | $ | 22 | $ | 93 | ||||||
Total losses included in earnings |
(28 | ) | | (28 | ) | |||||||
Unrealized (losses) |
(23 | ) | | (23 | ) | |||||||
Purchases |
| | | |||||||||
Settlements |
| | | |||||||||
Transfer from Level 3 to Level 2 |
(20 | ) | | (20 | ) | |||||||
Fair value at September 30, 2010 |
$ | | $ | 22 | $ | 22 | ||||||
Asahi Tec | Auction Rate | |||||||||||
Preferred Stock | Securities | Total | ||||||||||
Fair value January 1, 2009 |
$ | 72 | $ | 22 | $ | 94 | ||||||
Total losses included in earnings |
| | | |||||||||
Unrealized (losses) |
(1 | ) | | (1 | ) | |||||||
Purchases, issuances, settlements |
| | | |||||||||
Fair value at December 31, 2009 |
$ | 71 | $ | 22 | $ | 93 | ||||||
8
Non-Recurring Fair Value Measurements. Financial investments measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis during the period and the amounts for each level within the fair value hierarchy were as follows, in millions: |
Fair Value Measurements Using | ||||||||||||||||||||
Significant | ||||||||||||||||||||
Quoted | Other | Significant | ||||||||||||||||||
Market | Observable | Unobservable | Total | |||||||||||||||||
Sep. 30, | Prices | Inputs | Inputs | Gains | ||||||||||||||||
2010 | (Level 1) | (Level 2) | (Level 3) | (Losses) | ||||||||||||||||
Private equity funds |
$ | 2 | $ | | $ | | $ | 2 | $ | (3 | ) | |||||||||
Other private
investments |
| | | | (2 | ) | ||||||||||||||
$ | 2 | $ | | $ | | $ | 2 | $ | (5 | ) | ||||||||||
Fair Value Measurements Using | ||||||||||||||||||||
Significant | ||||||||||||||||||||
Quoted | Other | Significant | ||||||||||||||||||
Market | Observable | Unobservable | Total | |||||||||||||||||
Dec. 31, | Prices | Inputs | Inputs | Gains | ||||||||||||||||
2009 | (Level 1) | (Level 2) | (Level 3) | (Losses) | ||||||||||||||||
Private equity funds |
$ | 31 | $ | | $ | | $ | 31 | $ | (10 | ) | |||||||||
Other private
investments |
3 | | | 3 | | |||||||||||||||
$ | 34 | $ | | $ | | $ | 34 | $ | (10 | ) | ||||||||||
During the second quarter of 2010, based on information from the fund manager, the Company determined that the decline in the estimated value of two private equity funds (with an aggregate carrying value of $5 million prior to impairment) was other-than-temporary and, accordingly, recognized non-cash, pre-tax impairment charges of $3 million. The remaining private equity investments, with an aggregate carrying value of $113 million at September 30, 2010, were not evaluated for impairment, as there were no indicators of impairment or identified events or changes in circumstances that would have a significant adverse effect on the fair value of the investments. During the second quarter of 2010, the Company also determined that the decline in the estimated value of one private investment was other-than-temporary and, accordingly, recognized a non-cash, pre-tax impairment charge of $2 million. The Company did not have any transfers between Level 1 and Level 2 financial assets in the first nine months of 2010 or in the full-year 2009. | ||
During 2009, the Company determined that the decline in the estimated value of certain private equity funds (with an aggregate carrying value of $41 million prior to impairment) was other-than-temporary and, accordingly, recognized non-cash, pre-tax impairment charges of $10 million for the year ended December 31, 2009. The remaining private equity investments, with an aggregate carrying value of $92 million at December 31, 2009, were not evaluated for impairment, as there were no indicators of impairment or identified events or changes in circumstances that would have a significant adverse effect on the fair value of the investments. |
9
Loss from financial investments, net, was $3 million and $2 million, respectively, for the three months and nine months ended September 30, 2010. | ||
Impairment charges for financial investments were as follows, in millions: |
Three Months Ended | Nine Months Ended | |||||||||||||||
September 30, | September 30, | |||||||||||||||
2010 | 2009 | 2010 | 2009 | |||||||||||||
Impairment charges: |
||||||||||||||||
Asahi Tec Preferred
Stock | $ | | $ | | $ | (28 | ) | $ | | |||||||
Private equity funds |
| | (3 | ) | (10 | ) | ||||||||||
Other private investments |
| | (2 | ) | | |||||||||||
Total impairment charges |
$ | | $ | | $ | (33 | ) | $ | (10 | ) | ||||||
The fair value of the Companys short-term and long-term fixed-rate debt instruments is based principally upon quoted market prices for the same or similar issues or the current rates available to the Company for debt with similar terms and remaining maturities. The aggregate estimated market value of short-term and long-term debt at September 30, 2010 was approximately $4.1 billion, compared with the aggregate carrying value of $4.1 billion. The aggregate estimated market value of short-term and long-term debt at December 31, 2009 was approximately $3.9 billion, compared with the aggregate carrying value of $4.0 billion. | ||
F. | During 2010 and 2009, the Company entered into foreign currency exchange contracts to hedge currency fluctuations related to intercompany loans denominated in non-functional currencies. At September 30, 2010, the Company had recorded losses of $5 million on the foreign currency exchange contracts, which is partially offset by gains related to the translation of loans and accounts denominated in non-functional currencies. At December 31, 2009, the Company had no recorded asset or liability related to foreign currency exchange contracts. Gains (losses) related to these contracts are recorded in the Companys consolidated statements of income in other income (expense), net. For the nine months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009, the Company had recorded losses of $5 million and $1 million, respectively, related to these foreign currency exchange contracts. For the three months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009, the Company had recorded gains (losses) of $(10) million and $2 million, respectively, related to these foreign currency exchange contracts. | |
During 2010 and 2009, the Company, including certain European operations, also entered into foreign currency forward contracts to manage a portion of its exposure to currency fluctuations in the European euro and the U.S. dollar. Based upon period-end market prices, the Company had recorded liabilities of $(2) million and $(1) million to reflect contract prices at September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively. Gains (losses) related to these contracts are recorded in the Companys consolidated statements of income in other income (expense), net. For the nine months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009, the Company had recorded (losses) of $(1) million and $(2) million, respectively, related to these foreign currency exchange contracts. For the three months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009, the Company had recorded gains (losses) of $1 million and $(1) million, respectively, related to these foreign currency exchange contracts. | ||
In the event that the counterparties fail to meet the terms of the foreign currency forward contracts, the Companys exposure is limited to the aggregate foreign currency rate differential with such institutions. |
10
During 2010, the Company entered into several contracts to manage its exposure to increases in the price of copper and zinc. Based upon period-end market prices, the Company had recorded assets of $3 million to reflect contract prices at September 30, 2010. Gains (losses) related to these contracts are recorded in the Companys consolidated statements of income in cost of goods sold. For the three months and nine months ended September 30, 2010, the Company had recorded gains of $4 million and $3 million, respectively, related to these contracts. | ||
The fair value of these derivative contracts is estimated on a recurring basis, quarterly, using Level 2 inputs (significant other observable inputs). | ||
G. | Changes in the Companys warranty liability were as follows, in millions: |
Nine Months Ended | Twelve Months Ended | |||||||
September 30, 2010 | December 31, 2009 | |||||||
Balance at January 1 |
$ | 109 | $ | 119 | ||||
Accruals for warranties
issued during the period |
30 | 32 | ||||||
Accruals related to
pre-existing warranties |
(2 | ) | 5 | |||||
Settlements made (in cash or
kind) during the period |
(28 | ) | (44 | ) | ||||
Other, net |
(2 | ) | (3 | ) | ||||
Balance at end of period |
$ | 107 | $ | 109 | ||||
H. | At September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, there were outstanding $108 million principal amount at maturity of Zero Coupon Convertible Senior Notes due 2031, with an accreted value of $57 million and $55 million, respectively. | |
The Company retired $300 million of floating rate notes on March 12, 2010, the scheduled maturity date. | ||
On March 10, 2010, the Company issued $500 million of 7.125% Notes (Notes) due March 15, 2020. The Notes are senior indebtedness and are redeemable at the Companys option. | ||
During the second quarter of 2010, the Company repurchased $59 million of 5.875% Notes due July 2012, in open-market transactions. The Company paid a premium of $2 million over par value on the purchase of the notes; such expense was included in interest expense. | ||
On June 21, 2010, the Company entered into a Credit Agreement (the New Credit Agreement) dated as of June 21, 2010, with a bank group, with an aggregate commitment of $1.25 billion with a maturity date of January 10, 2014. The Companys 5-Year Revolving Credit Agreement dated as of November 5, 2004, as amended, with an aggregate commitment of $1.25 billion, was terminated. |
11
The New Credit Agreement provides for an unsecured revolving credit facility available to the Company and one of its foreign subsidiaries, in U.S. dollars, European euros and certain other currencies. Borrowings under the revolver denominated in euros are limited to $500 million, equivalent. The Company can also borrow swingline loans up to $150 million and obtain letters of credit of up to $250 million; any outstanding Letters of Credit reduce the Companys borrowing capacity. At September 30, 2010, the Company had $100 million of unused Letters of Credit, reducing the Companys borrowing capacity by such amount. | ||
Revolving credit loans bear interest under the New Credit Agreement, at the Companys option: at (A) a rate per annum equal to the greatest of (i) prime rate, (ii) the Federal Funds effective rate plus 0.50% and (iii) LIBOR plus 1.0% (the Alternative Base Rate); plus an applicable margin based upon the then applicable corporate credit ratings of the Company; or (B) LIBOR plus an applicable margin based upon the then applicable corporate credit ratings of the Company. The foreign currency revolving credit loans bear interest at a rate equal to LIBOR plus an applicable margin based upon the then applicable corporate credit ratings of the Company. | ||
The New Credit Agreement contains financial covenants requiring the Company to maintain (A) a maximum debt to total capitalization ratio of 65 percent, and (B) a minimum interest coverage ratio equal to or greater than (i) 2.25 to 1.0 through the quarter ending on September 30, 2011 and (ii) 2.50 to 1.0 thereafter. The debt to total capitalization ratio allows the add-back, if incurred, of up to the first $500 million of certain non-cash charges, including goodwill and other intangible asset impairment charges, occurring from and after April 1, 2010, that would negatively impact shareholders equity. | ||
Based on the limitations of the debt to total capitalization covenant, at September 30, 2010, the Company had additional borrowing capacity, subject to availability, of up to $1.2 billion. Alternatively, at September 30, 2010, the Company could absorb a reduction to shareholders equity of approximately $700 million, and remain in compliance with the debt to total capitalization covenant. | ||
In order to borrow under the New Credit Agreement, there must not be any default in the Companys covenants in the credit agreement (i.e., in addition to the two financial covenants, principally limitations on subsidiary debt, negative pledge restrictions, legal compliance requirements and maintenance of properties and insurance) and the Companys representations and warranties in the credit agreement must be true in all material respects on the date of borrowing (i.e., principally no material adverse change or litigation likely to result in a material adverse change, since December 31, 2009, in each case, no material ERISA or environmental non-compliance and no material tax deficiency). The Company was in compliance with all covenants and no borrowings have been made at September 30, 2010. |
12
I. | The Companys 2005 Long Term Stock Incentive Plan (the 2005 Plan) provides for the issuance of stock-based incentives in various forms to employees and non-employee Directors of the Company. At September 30, 2010, outstanding stock-based incentives were in the form of long-term stock awards, stock options, phantom stock awards and stock appreciation rights. Pre-tax compensation expense and the related income tax benefit, for these stock-based incentives, were as follows, in millions: |
Three Months Ended | Nine Months Ended | |||||||||||||||
September 30, | September 30, | |||||||||||||||
2010 | 2009 | 2010 | 2009 | |||||||||||||
Long-term stock awards |
$ | 9 | $ | 7 | $ | 28 | $ | 28 | ||||||||
Stock options |
6 | 6 | 17 | 21 | ||||||||||||
Phantom stock awards and stock
appreciation rights |
1 | 3 | | 5 | ||||||||||||
Total |
$ | 16 | $ | 16 | $ | 45 | $ | 54 | ||||||||
Income tax benefit |
$ | 6 | $ | 6 | $ | 17 | $ | 20 | ||||||||
In June 2009, the Company recognized $6 million of accelerated stock compensation expense (for previously granted stock awards and options) related to the retirement from full-time employment of the Companys Executive Chairman of the Board of Directors; he continues to serve as a non-executive, non-employee Chairman of the Board of Directors. | ||
Long-Term Stock Awards | ||
Long-term stock awards are granted to key employees and non-employee Directors of the Company and do not cause net share dilution inasmuch as the Company continues the practice of repurchasing and retiring an equal number of shares on the open market. Stock awards granted prior to January 1, 2010 have a typical vesting period of 10 years. Stock awards granted subsequent to January 1, 2010 have a vesting period of 5 years. | ||
The Companys long-term stock award activity was as follows, shares in millions: |
Nine Months Ended | ||||||||
September 30, | ||||||||
2010 | 2009 | |||||||
Unvested stock award
shares at January 1 | 9 | 8 | ||||||
Weighted average grant
date fair value | $ | 21 | $ | 26 | ||||
Stock award shares
granted | 3 | 2 | ||||||
Weighted average grant
date fair value | $ | 14 | $ | 8 | ||||
Stock award shares
vested | 2 | 1 | ||||||
Weighted average grant
date fair value | $ | 23 | $ | 26 | ||||
Stock award shares
forfeited | | | ||||||
Weighted average grant
date fair value | $ | 19 | $ | 25 | ||||
Unvested stock award
shares at September 30 | 10 | 9 | ||||||
Weighted average grant
date fair value | $ | 19 | $ | 22 |
13
At September 30, 2010 and 2009, there was $136 million and $135 million, respectively, of total unrecognized compensation expense related to unvested stock awards; such awards had a weighted average remaining vesting period of five years and seven years, respectively. | ||
The total market value (at the vesting date) of stock award shares which vested during the nine months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009 was $22 million and $16 million, respectively. | ||
Stock Options | ||
Stock options are granted to key employees and, prior to 2010, to non-employee Directors of the Company. The exercise price equals the market price of the Companys common stock at the grant date. These options generally become exercisable (vest ratably) over five years beginning on the first anniversary from the date of grant and expire no later than 10 years after the grant date. | ||
The Company granted 5,205,100 of stock option shares in the nine months ended September 30, 2010 with a grant date exercise price approximating $14 per share. In the first nine months of 2010, 3,552,100 stock option shares were forfeited (including options that expired unexercised). |
14
The Companys stock option activity was as follows, shares in millions: |
Nine Months Ended | ||||||||
September 30, | ||||||||
2010 | 2009 | |||||||
Option shares
outstanding, January 1 | 36 | 31 | ||||||
Weighted average
exercise price | $ | 23 | $ | 25 | ||||
Option shares granted, including restoration
options |
5 | 6 | ||||||
Weighted average
exercise price | $ | 14 | $ | 8 | ||||
Option shares exercised |
| | ||||||
Aggregate intrinsic value on date of
exercise (A) |
$1 | million | $ | | ||||
Weighted average
exercise price | $ | 8 | $ | | ||||
Option shares forfeited |
4 | 1 | ||||||
Weighted average
exercise price | $ | 23 | $ | 23 | ||||
Option shares
outstanding, September 30 | 37 | 36 | ||||||
Weighted average
exercise price | $ | 21 | $ | 23 | ||||
Weighted average remaining option term
(in years) |
6 | 6 | ||||||
Option shares vested and expected to vest,
September 30 |
37 | 36 | ||||||
Weighted average
exercise price | $ | 22 | $ | 23 | ||||
Aggregate intrinsic
value (A) | $15 | million | $26 | million | ||||
Weighted average remaining option term
(in years) |
6 | 6 | ||||||
Option shares exercisable (vested),
September 30 |
22 | 21 | ||||||
Weighted average
exercise price | $ | 25 | $ | 26 | ||||
Aggregate intrinsic
value (A) | $3 | million | $ | | ||||
Weighted average remaining option term
(in years) |
4 | 4 |
(A) | Aggregate intrinsic value is calculated using the Companys stock price at each respective date, less the exercise price (grant date price) multiplied by the number of shares. |
At September 30, 2010 and 2009, there was $50 million and $47 million, respectively, of unrecognized compensation expense (using the Black-Scholes option pricing model) related to unvested stock options; such options had a weighted average vesting period of three years in 2010 and 2009. |
15
The weighted average grant date fair value of option shares granted and the assumptions used to estimate those values using a Black-Scholes option pricing model, were as follows: |
Nine Months Ended | ||||||||
September 30, | ||||||||
2010 | 2009 | |||||||
Weighted average grant
date fair value | $ | 5.30 | $ | 2.23 | ||||
Risk-free interest rate |
2.77 | % | 2.59 | % | ||||
Dividend yield |
2.17 | % | 3.73 | % | ||||
Volatility factor |
46.01 | % | 39.07 | % | ||||
Expected option life |
6 years | 6 years |
J. | The Company sponsors qualified defined-benefit or defined-contribution retirement plans for most of its employees. In addition to the Companys qualified defined-benefit pension plans, the Company has unfunded non-qualified defined-benefit pension plans covering certain employees, which provide for benefits in addition to those provided by the qualified pension plans. Substantially all salaried employees participate in non-contributory defined-contribution retirement plans, to which payments are determined annually by the Organization and Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors. | |
Effective January 1, 2010, the Company froze all future benefit accruals under substantially all of the Companys domestic qualified and non-qualified defined-benefit pension plans. | ||
Net periodic pension cost for the Companys defined-benefit pension plans was as follows, in millions: |
Three Months ended September 30, | ||||||||||||||||
2010 | 2009 | |||||||||||||||
Qualified | Non-Qualified | Qualified | Non-Qualified | |||||||||||||
Service cost |
$ | 2 | $ | | $ | 3 | $ | | ||||||||
Interest cost |
11 | 3 | 7 | 2 | ||||||||||||
Expected return on plan
assets | (9 | ) | | (5 | ) | | ||||||||||
Amortization of prior
service cost | | | | | ||||||||||||
Recognized curtailment loss |
| | | | ||||||||||||
Amortization of net loss |
3 | | 3 | | ||||||||||||
Net periodic pension
cost | $ | 7 | $ | 3 | 8 | 2 | ||||||||||
Nine Months ended September 30, | ||||||||||||||||
2010 | 2009 | |||||||||||||||
Qualified | Non-Qualified | Qualified | Non-Qualified | |||||||||||||
Service cost |
$ | 4 | $ | | $ | 9 | $ | 1 | ||||||||
Interest cost |
34 | 7 | 26 | 5 | ||||||||||||
Expected return on plan
assets | (27 | ) | | (18 | ) | | ||||||||||
Amortization of prior
service cost | | | | 1 | ||||||||||||
Recognized curtailment loss |
| | 3 | 5 | ||||||||||||
Amortization of net loss |
8 | | 10 | | ||||||||||||
Net periodic pension
cost | $ | 19 | $ | 7 | $ | 30 | $ | 12 | ||||||||
16
Assumptions | ||
Major assumptions used in accounting for the Companys defined-benefit pension plans were as follows: |
December 31, | ||||||||
2009 | 2008 | |||||||
Discount rate for obligations |
5.8 | % | 6.1 | % | ||||
Expected return on plan
assets | 8.0 | % | 8.0 | % | ||||
Discount rate for net
periodic pension cost | 6.1 | % | 6.25 | % |
The discount rate for obligations was based upon the expected duration of each defined-benefit pension plans liabilities matched to the widely used Citigroup Pension Discount Curve and Liability Index for December 31, 2009. Such rates for the Companys defined benefit pension plans ranged from 2.60 percent to 6.25 percent, with the most significant portion of the liabilities having a discount rate for obligations of 5.60 percent or higher at December 31, 2009. The decline in the weighted average discount rate to 5.8 percent in 2009 from 6.1 percent in 2008 was principally the result of the variation in long-term rates which were highly volatile at the end of 2008 compared to 2009, for the Citigroup Pension Discount Curve, and the freezing of all future benefit accruals under substantially all of the Companys domestic qualified and non-qualified defined-benefit plans, which shortened the period of future pension payments. The decrease in the discount rate increased our projected benefit obligation by approximately $29 million. | ||
The Company determined the expected long-term rate of return on plan assets of 8 percent based upon an analysis of expected and historical rates of return of various asset classes utilizing the current and long-term target asset allocation of the plan assets. The projected asset return at December 31, 2009 also considered near term returns, including current market conditions and also that pension assets are long-term in nature. The actual annual rate of return on the Companys pension plan assets was 3.3 percent and .5 percent for the 10-year periods ended December 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively. Although these rates of return are less than the Companys current expected long-term rate of return on plan assets, the Company notes that these 10-year periods include two significant declines in the equity markets. Accordingly, the Company believes an 8 percent expected long-term rate of return is reasonable. |
17
The investment objectives seek to minimize the volatility of the value of the Companys plan assets relative to pension liabilities and to ensure plan assets are sufficient to pay plan benefits. The Company, based upon discussions with its pension investment advisor, reduced its equity allocation to 70 percent from 80 percent; increased its fixed-income allocation to 25 percent from 10 percent and allocated 5 percent to alternative investments. The revised asset allocation of the investment portfolio was developed with the objective of achieving the Companys expected rate of return and reducing volatility of asset returns, and considered the freezing of future benefits. The equity portfolios are invested in individual securities or funds that are expected to mirror broad market returns for equity securities. The fixed-income portfolio is invested in corporate bonds, bond index funds or U.S. Treasury securities. The increased allocation to fixed-income securities partially matches the bond-like and long-term nature of the pension liabilities. In 2010, the pension investment advisor recommended that, longer term, the Company should achieve the following targeted asset portfolio: 45 percent equities, 25 percent fixed-income, 15 percent global assets (combination of equity and fixed-income) and 15 percent alternative investments (such as private equity, commodities and hedge funds). The Company expects to achieve this allocation by December 31, 2011. This targeted portfolio is expected to yield a long-term rate of return of 8 percent. | ||
The fair value of the Companys plan assets is subject to risk including significant concentrations of risk in the Companys plan assets related to equity, interest rate and operating risk. In order to ensure plan assets are sufficient to pay benefits, a portion of plan assets is allocated to equity investments that are expected over time, to earn higher returns with more volatility than fixed-income investments which more closely match pension liabilities. Within equity, risk is mitigated by targeting a portfolio that is broadly diversified by geography, market capitalization, manager mandate size, investment style and process. | ||
In order to minimize asset volatility relative to the liabilities, a portion of plan assets are allocated to fixed-income investments that are exposed to interest rate risk. Rate increases generally will result in a decline in fixed-income assets, while reducing the present value of the liabilities. Conversely, rate decreases will increase fixed income assets, partially offsetting the related increase in the liabilities. | ||
The Company has targeted alternative investments such as hedge funds, private equity funds and commodities that are expected to comprise 15 percent of the pension assets. It is expected that the alternative investments would have a higher rate of return than the targeted overall long-term return of 8 percent. However, these investments are subject to greater volatility, due to their nature, than a portfolio of equities and fixed-income investments, and would be less liquid than financial instruments that trade on public markets. | ||
Potential events or circumstances that could have a negative effect on estimated fair value include the risks of inadequate diversification and other operating risks. To mitigate these risks, investments are diversified across and within asset classes in support of investment objectives. Policies and practices to address operating risks include ongoing manager oversight, plan and asset class investment guidelines and instructions that are communicated to managers, and periodic compliance and audit reviews to ensure adherence to these policies. In addition, the Company periodically seeks the input of its independent advisor to ensure the investment policy is appropriate. |
18
K. | The components of accumulated other comprehensive income attributable to Masco Corporation were as follows, in millions: |
September 30, 2010 | December 31, 2009 | |||||||
Cumulative translation adjustments |
$ | 518 | $ | 546 | ||||
Unrealized gain on marketable
securities, net |
21 | 25 | ||||||
Unrecognized prior service cost and
net loss, net |
(200 | ) | (205 | ) | ||||
Accumulated other comprehensive
income |
$ | 339 | $ | 366 | ||||
The components of accumulated other comprehensive attributable to noncontrolling interest were as follows, in millions: |
September 30, 2010 | December 31, 2009 | |||||||
Cumulative translation adjustments |
$ | 22 | $ | 31 | ||||
Unrealized gain on marketable
securities, net |
| | ||||||
Unrecognized prior service cost and
net loss, net |
| | ||||||
Accumulated other comprehensive
income |
$ | 22 | $ | 31 | ||||
19
The Companys total comprehensive income was as follows, in millions: |
Three Months Ended | Three Months Ended | |||||||||||||||
September 30, 2010 | September 30, 2009 | |||||||||||||||
Attributable to | Noncontrolling | Attributable to | Noncontrolling | |||||||||||||
Masco Corporation | Interest | Masco Corporation | Interest | |||||||||||||
Net (loss) income |
$ | (5 | ) | $ | 12 | $ | 28 | $ | 12 | |||||||
Other comprehensive income: |
||||||||||||||||
Cumulative translation
adjustments, net |
72 | 22 | 18 | 6 | ||||||||||||
Unrealized gain on marketable
securities, net |
4 | | 16 | | ||||||||||||
Prior service cost and
net loss, net |
1 | | | | ||||||||||||
Total comprehensive income |
$ | 72 | $ | 34 | $ | 62 | $ | 18 | ||||||||
Nine Months Ended | Nine Months Ended | |||||||||||||||
September 30, 2010 | September 30, 2009 | |||||||||||||||
Attributable to | Noncontrolling | Attributable to | Noncontrolling | |||||||||||||
Masco Corporation | Interest | Masco Corporation | Interest | |||||||||||||
Net (loss) income |
$ | (9 | ) | $ | 32 | $ | 2 | $ | 27 | |||||||
Other comprehensive income: |
||||||||||||||||
Cumulative translation
adjustments, net |
(28 | ) | (9 | ) | 30 | 10 | ||||||||||
Unrealized (loss) gain on
marketable securities, net |
(4 | ) | | 21 | | |||||||||||
Prior service cost and
net loss, net |
5 | | 62 | | ||||||||||||
Total comprehensive (loss) income |
$ | (36 | ) | $ | 23 | $ | 115 | $ | 37 | |||||||
The unrealized gain (loss) on marketable securities, net, is net of income tax expense (benefit) of $3 million and $(1) million, respectively, for the three months and nine months ended September 30, 2010. The unrealized gain on marketable securities, net, is net of income tax of $8 million and $11 million, respectively, for the three months and nine months ended September 30, 2009. The prior service cost and net loss, net, is net of income tax of $1 million and $3 million for the three months and nine months ended September 30, 2010, respectively. The prior service cost and net loss, net, is net of income tax of $36 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2009. | ||
On the basis of amounts paid (declared), cash dividends per common share were $.075 ($.075) and $.225 ($.225) for the three months and nine months ended September 30, 2010, respectively. On the basis of amounts paid (declared), cash dividends per common share were $.075 ($.075) and $.385 ($.225) for the three months and nine months ended September 30, 2009, respectively. |
20
L. | Information about the Company by segment and geographic area was as follows, in millions: |
Three Months Ended September 30, | Nine Months Ended September 30, | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2010 | 2009 | 2010 | 2009 | 2010 | 2009 | 2010 | 2009 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net Sales(A) | Operating Profit (Loss) | Net Sales(A) | Operating Profit (Loss) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
The Companys operations by
segment were: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cabinets and Related Products |
$ | 357 | $ | 434 | $ | (61 | ) | $ | (16 | ) | $ | 1,160 | $ | 1,248 | $ | (113 | ) | $ | (56 | ) | ||||||||||||
Plumbing Products |
686 | 678 | 97 | 93 | 2,031 | 1,893 | 267 | 202 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Installation and Other Services |
292 | 332 | (22 | ) | (34 | ) | 874 | 961 | (87 | ) | (104 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Decorative Architectural Products |
463 | 474 | 104 | 122 | 1,357 | 1,365 | 300 | 313 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other Specialty Products |
159 | 166 | 11 | 16 | 435 | 427 | 16 | 16 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total |
$ | 1,957 | $ | 2,084 | $ | 129 | $ | 181 | $ | 5,857 | $ | 5,894 | $ | 383 | $ | 371 | ||||||||||||||||
The Companys operations by
geographic area were: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
North America |
$ | 1,528 | $ | 1,630 | $ | 79 | $ | 123 | $ | 4,617 | $ | 4,694 | $ | 257 | $ | 261 | ||||||||||||||||
International, principally Europe |
429 | 454 | 50 | 58 | 1,240 | 1,200 | 126 | 110 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total |
$ | 1,957 | $ | 2,084 | 129 | 181 | $ | 5,857 | $ | 5,894 | 383 | 371 | ||||||||||||||||||||
General corporate
expense, net | (27 | ) | (36 | ) | (84 | ) | (96 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Charge for litigation
settlement (B) | | (7 | ) | | (7 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Accelerated stock
compensation expense (C) | | | | (6 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(Loss) on corporate
fixed assets, net | | | | (2 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Charge for defined-benefit plan
curtailment (D) |
| | | (8 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Operating profit |
102 | 138 | 299 | 252 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other income (expense),
net | (64 | ) | (49 | ) | (223 | ) | (157 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Income from continuing operations
before income taxes |
$ | 38 | $ | 89 | $ | 76 | $ | 95 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
(A) | Inter-segment sales were not material. | |
(B) | The charge for litigation settlement in 2009 relates to a business unit in the Cabinets and Related Products segment. | |
(C) | See Note I to the condensed consolidated financial statements. | |
(D) | In March 2009, the Company recognized a curtailment loss related to the plan to freeze all future benefit accruals beginning January 1, 2010 under substantially all of the Companys domestic qualified and non-qualified defined-benefit pension plans. |
21
M. | Other, net, which is included in other income (expense), net, was as follows, in millions: |
Three Months Ended | Nine Months Ended | |||||||||||||||
September 30, | September 30, | |||||||||||||||
2010 | 2009 | 2010 | 2009 | |||||||||||||
Income from cash and
cash investments |
$ | 2 | $ | 2 | $ | 4 | $ | 6 | ||||||||
Other interest income |
| 1 | 1 | 1 | ||||||||||||
Loss from financial
investments (Note E) |
(3 | ) | | (2 | ) | | ||||||||||
Other items, net |
| 4 | (5 | ) | 15 | |||||||||||
Total |
$ | (1 | ) | $ | 7 | $ | (2 | ) | $ | 22 | ||||||
Other items, net, included $4 million and $(2) million of currency gains (losses) for the three months and nine months ended September 30, 2010, respectively. Other items, net, included $5 million and $14 million of currency gains for the three months and nine months ended September 30, 2009, respectively. | ||
N. | Reconciliations of the numerators and denominators used in the computations of basic and diluted earnings per common share were as follows, in millions: |
Three Months Ended | Nine Months Ended | |||||||||||||||
September 30, | September 30, | |||||||||||||||
2010 | 2009 | 2010 | 2009 | |||||||||||||
Numerator (basic and diluted): |
||||||||||||||||
(Loss) income from continuing
operations |
$ | (5 | ) | $ | 51 | $ | (9 | ) | $ | 33 | ||||||
Allocation to unvested
restricted stock awards |
(1 | ) | (1 | ) | (2 | ) | (2 | ) | ||||||||
(Loss) income from continuing
operations attributable to
common shareholders |
(6 | ) | 50 | (11 | ) | 31 | ||||||||||
Loss from discontinued
operations, net |
| (23 | ) | | (31 | ) | ||||||||||
Net (loss) income available to
common shareholders |
$ | (6 | ) | $ | 27 | $ | (11 | ) | $ | | ||||||
Denominator: |
||||||||||||||||
Basic common shares (based
upon weighted average) |
349 | 350 | 349 | 351 | ||||||||||||
Add: |
||||||||||||||||
Contingent common shares |
| | | | ||||||||||||
Stock option dilution |
| 1 | | | ||||||||||||
Diluted common shares |
349 | 351 | 349 | 351 | ||||||||||||
For the three months and nine months ended September 30, 2010 and the nine months ended September 30, 2009, the Company allocated dividends to the unvested restricted stock awards (participating securities). For the three months ended September 30, 2009, the Company allocated dividends and income to the unvested restricted stock awards (participating securities). | ||
At September 30, 2010 and 2009, the Company did not include any common shares related to the Zero Coupon Convertible Senior Notes (Notes) in the calculation of diluted earnings per common share, as the price of the Companys common stock at September 30, 2010 and 2009 did not exceed the equivalent accreted value of the Notes. |
22
Additionally, 37 million common shares for both the three months and nine months ended September 30, 2010 and 35 million and 36 million common shares for the three months and nine months ended September 30, 2009, respectively, related to stock options were excluded from the computation of diluted earnings per common share due to their antidilutive effect. | ||
In the first nine months of 2010, the Company granted three million shares of long-term stock awards. In the first nine months of 2010, the Company also repurchased and retired approximately three million shares of Company common stock, for cash aggregating $45 million to offset the dilutive impact of these long-term stock awards. At September 30, 2010, the Company had 27 million shares of its common stock remaining under the July 2007 Board of Directors repurchase authorization. | ||
O. | The Company is subject to lawsuits and pending or asserted claims with respect to matters generally arising in the ordinary course of business. | |
As previously disclosed, a lawsuit has been brought against the Company and a number of its insulation installation companies in the federal court in Atlanta, Georgia alleging that certain practices violate provisions of the federal antitrust laws. In February 2009, the federal court in Atlanta certified a class of 377 insulation contractors. Two additional lawsuits, seeking class action status and alleging anticompetitive conduct, were filed against the Company and a number of its insulation suppliers. One of these lawsuits has been dismissed with prejudice and, with respect to the second lawsuit, which was originally filed in northern California and was subsequently transferred to Atlanta, Georgia, the Court has recently administratively stayed the case. The Company is vigorously defending the pending cases. Based upon the advice of its outside counsel, the Company believes that the conduct of the Company and its insulation installation companies, which has been the subject of the above-described lawsuits, has not violated any antitrust laws. The Company is unable at this time to reliably estimate any potential liability which might occur from an adverse judgment. There cannot be any assurance that the Company will ultimately prevail in the remaining lawsuits, or, if unsuccessful, that the ultimate liability would not be material and would not have a material adverse effect on its businesses or the methods used by its insulation installation companies in doing business. | ||
P. | The increased tax rate for the first nine months of 2010 includes the impact of certain plant closure costs and other losses not providing tax benefits in certain jurisdictions combined with a decrease in 2010 pre-tax income. | |
During the first nine months of 2010, the liability on uncertain tax positions including interest and penalties, net of U.S. Federal income tax benefit, increased by $8 million primarily due to changes in the tax environment related to certain activities performed in various jurisdictions that caused a re-measurement of this liability. As a result of tax audit closings, settlements and expiration of applicable statutes of limitations in various jurisdictions within the next 12 months, the Company anticipates that it is reasonably possible that the liability on uncertain tax positions could be reduced by approximately $11 million. | ||
Due to the difficulty in estimating the annual effective tax rate in 2009, a discrete calculation was used to report tax expense rather than an estimated annual effective tax rate. |
23
Q. | As announced in February 2010, the Company is combining its Builder Cabinet Group and Retail Cabinet Group to form Masco Cabinetry. In April 2010, Masco Cabinetry decided to discontinue the manufacture of ready-to-assemble and other non-core in-stock assembled cabinet product lines as they are not consistent with Masco Cabinetrys strategy of growth through brand building and innovation. These product lines had aggregate annual sales of approximately $200 million in 2009. The Company anticipates it will close two manufacturing facilities associated with these products in the first half of 2011. The Company expects to incur approximately $119 million (principally recognized ratably over 15 months beginning April 2010) of pre-tax charges related to the anticipated plant closures including approximately $99 million related to non-cash charges principally associated with property, plant and equipment and approximately $20 million of other cash charges. At September 30, 2010, the Company had incurred $33 million related to accelerated depreciation costs and $15 million related to inventory reserves. |
24
Item 2. | MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF | |||
FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS |
Three Months Ended | Percent | |||||||||||
September 30, | (Decrease) Increase | |||||||||||
2010 | 2009 | 2010 vs. 2009 | ||||||||||
Net Sales: |
||||||||||||
Cabinets and Related Products |
$ | 357 | $ | 434 | (18%) | |||||||
Plumbing Products |
686 | 678 | 1% | |||||||||
Installation and Other Services |
292 | 332 | (12%) | |||||||||
Decorative Architectural Products |
463 | 474 | (2%) | |||||||||
Other Specialty Products |
159 | 166 | (4%) | |||||||||
Total |
$ | 1,957 | $ | 2,084 | (6%) | |||||||
North America |
$ | 1,528 | $ | 1,630 | (6%) | |||||||
International, principally Europe |
429 | 454 | (6%) | |||||||||
Total |
$ | 1,957 | $ | 2,084 | (6%) | |||||||
Nine Months Ended | ||||||||||||
September 30, | ||||||||||||
2010 | 2009 | |||||||||||
Net Sales: |
||||||||||||
Cabinets and Related Products |
$ | 1,160 | $ | 1,248 | (7%) | |||||||
Plumbing Products |
2,031 | 1,893 | 7% | |||||||||
Installation and Other Services |
874 | 961 | (9%) | |||||||||
Decorative Architectural Products |
1,357 | 1,365 | (1%) | |||||||||
Other Specialty Products |
435 | 427 | 2% | |||||||||
Total |
$ | 5,857 | $ | 5,894 | (1%) | |||||||
North America |
$ | 4,617 | $ | 4,694 | (2%) | |||||||
International, principally Europe |
1,240 | 1,200 | 3% | |||||||||
Total |
$ | 5,857 | $ | 5,894 | (1%) | |||||||
Three Months Ended | Nine Months Ended | |||||||||||||||
September 30, | September 30, | |||||||||||||||
2010 | 2009 | 2010 | 2009 | |||||||||||||
Operating Profit (Loss) Margins: (A) |
||||||||||||||||
Cabinets and Related Products |
(17.1 | %) | (3.7 | %) | (9.7 | %) | (4.5 | %) | ||||||||
Plumbing Products |
14.1 | % | 13.7 | % | 13.1 | % | 10.7 | % | ||||||||
Installation and Other Services |
(7.5 | %) | (10.2 | %) | (10.0 | %) | (10.8 | %) | ||||||||
Decorative Architectural Products |
22.5 | % | 25.7 | % | 22.1 | % | 22.9 | % | ||||||||
Other Specialty Products |
6.9 | % | 9.6 | % | 3.7 | % | 3.7 | % | ||||||||
North America |
5.2 | % | 7.5 | % | 5.6 | % | 5.6 | % | ||||||||
International, principally Europe |
11.7 | % | 12.8 | % | 10.2 | % | 9.2 | % | ||||||||
Total |
6.6 | % | 8.7 | % | 6.5 | % | 6.3 | % | ||||||||
Total operating profit margin,
as reported |
5.2 | % | 6.6 | % | 5.1 | % | 4.3 | % |
(A) | Before general corporate expense, net, the charge for litigation settlement, the accelerated stock compensation expense, the (loss) on corporate fixed assets, net and the charge for the defined-benefit plan curtailment; see Note L to the condensed consolidated financial statements. |
25
Item 2. | MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF | |||
FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS |
Three Months Ended | Nine Months Ended | |||||||||||||||
September 30, | September 30, | |||||||||||||||
2010 | 2009 | 2010 | 2009 | |||||||||||||
Net sales, as reported |
$ | 1,957 | $ | 2,084 | $ | 5,857 | $ | 5,894 | ||||||||
Acquisitions (none) |
| | | | ||||||||||||
Net sales, excluding
acquisitions |
1,957 | 2,084 | 5,857 | 5,894 | ||||||||||||
Currency translation |
39 | | 18 | | ||||||||||||
Net sales, excluding
acquisitions and the
effect of currency
translation |
$ | 1,996 | $ | 2,084 | $ | 5,875 | $ | 5,894 | ||||||||
26
Item 2. | MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF | |||
FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS |
27
Item 2. | MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF | |||
FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS |
28
Item 2. | MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF | |||
FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS |
29
Item 2. | MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF | |||
FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS |
30
Item 2. | MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF | |||
FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS |
31
Item 4. | CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES |
a. | Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures. | ||
The Companys principal executive officer and principal financial officer have concluded, based on an evaluation of the Companys disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 Rules 13a-15(e) or 15d-15(e)), as required by paragraph (b) of Exchange Act Rules 13a-15 or 15d-15, that, as of September 30, 2010, the Companys disclosure controls and procedures were effective. | |||
b. | Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting. | ||
During the third quarter of 2010, the Company continued a phased deployment of a new Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) system at Masco Contractor Services and substantially completed the ERP implementation at Masco Builder Cabinet Group, two of the Companys larger business units. These new systems represent process improvement initiatives and are not in response to any identified deficiency or weakness in the Companys internal control over financial reporting. | |||
In February 2010, the Company announced plans to combine Masco Builder Cabinet Group and Masco Retail Cabinet Group to form Masco Cabinetry. During the third quarter of 2010, the Company began the process of integrating those business units in order to realize planned efficiency gains. | |||
The system implementations and business integration are designed, in part, to enhance the overall system of internal control over financial reporting through further automation and integration of various business processes. However, these business process initiatives are significant in scale and complexity and have resulted in modifications to certain internal controls during the third quarter. |
32
33
10 | | Non-Employee Directors Equity Program under Mascos 2005 Long Term Stock Incentive Plan (Amended October 2010) | ||||||
12 | | Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Combined Fixed Charges and Preferred Stock Dividends | ||||||
31a | | Certification by Chief Executive Officer Required by Rule 13a-14(a) or 15d-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 | ||||||
31b | | Certification by Chief Financial Officer Required by Rule 13a-14(a) or 15d-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 | ||||||
32 | | Certification Required by Rule 13a-14(b) or 15d-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code | ||||||
101 | | Interactive Data File |
34
MASCO CORPORATION | ||||||
By: | /s/ John G. Sznewajs | |||||
Name: | ||||||
Title: | Vice President, Treasurer and | |||||
Chief Financial Officer |
35
Exhibit | ||
Exhibit 10
|
Non-Employee Directors Equity Program under Mascos 2005 Long Term Stock Incentive Plan (Amended October 2010) | |
Exhibit 12
|
Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Combined Fixed Charges and Preferred Stock Dividends | |
Exhibit 31a
|
Certification by Chief Executive Officer Required by Rule 13a-14(a) or 15d-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 | |
Exhibit 31b
|
Certification by Chief Financial Officer Required by Rule 13a-14(a) or 15d-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 | |
Exhibit 32
|
Certification Required by Rule 13a-14(b) or 15d-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code | |
Exhibit 101
|
Interactive Data File |