e10vq
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
(mark one)
|
|
|
þ |
|
Quarterly Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 |
for the Quarterly Period Ended June 30, 2010
|
|
|
o |
|
Transition Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 |
|
|
|
|
|
for the transition period from to . |
Commission File Number: 001-31950
MONEYGRAM INTERNATIONAL, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
|
|
Delaware
(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization)
|
|
16-1690064
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.) |
|
|
|
1550 Utica Avenue South, Suite 100,
Minneapolis, Minnesota
(Address of principal executive offices)
|
|
55416
(Zip Code) |
(952) 591-3000
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
Not applicable
(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by
Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for
such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its
corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted
pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months
(or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).
Yes o No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a
non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of large accelerated
filer, accelerated filer, and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
(Check one):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Large accelerated filer o
|
|
Accelerated filer þ
|
|
Non-accelerated filer o
|
|
Smaller reporting company o |
|
|
|
|
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company) |
|
|
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).
Yes o No þ
Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuers classes of common stock, as of
the latest practicable date.
As of August 2, 2010, 83,335,522 shares of Common Stock, $0.01 par value, were outstanding.
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
MONEYGRAM INTERNATIONAL, INC.
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
UNAUDITED
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
December 31, |
(Amounts in thousands, except share data) |
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents (substantially restricted) |
|
|
3,492,147 |
|
|
|
3,776,824 |
|
Receivables, net (substantially restricted) |
|
|
1,047,768 |
|
|
|
1,054,381 |
|
Trading investments and related put options (substantially restricted) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
26,951 |
|
Available-for-sale investments (substantially restricted) |
|
|
216,894 |
|
|
|
298,633 |
|
Property and equipment |
|
|
121,069 |
|
|
|
127,972 |
|
Intangible assets |
|
|
7,318 |
|
|
|
7,680 |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
428,691 |
|
|
|
425,630 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
147,316 |
|
|
|
211,592 |
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
5,461,203 |
|
|
$ |
5,929,663 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payment service obligations |
|
$ |
4,472,692 |
|
|
$ |
4,843,454 |
|
Debt |
|
|
740,584 |
|
|
|
796,791 |
|
Pension and other postretirement benefits |
|
|
116,337 |
|
|
|
118,444 |
|
Accounts payable and other liabilities |
|
|
120,394 |
|
|
|
189,659 |
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
|
5,450,007 |
|
|
|
5,948,348 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES (NOTE 14) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
MEZZANINE EQUITY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Participating Convertible Preferred Stock-Series B, $0.01 par value, 800,000 shares authorized,
495,000 shares issued and outstanding |
|
|
581,923 |
|
|
|
539,084 |
|
Participating Convertible Preferred Stock-Series B-1, $0.01 par value, 500,000 shares authorized,
272,500 shares issued and outstanding |
|
|
347,265 |
|
|
|
325,244 |
|
|
Total mezzanine equity |
|
|
929,188 |
|
|
|
864,328 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
STOCKHOLDERS DEFICIT |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred shares, $0.01 par value, none issued |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common shares, $0.01 par value, 1,300,000,000 shares authorized, 88,556,077 shares issued |
|
|
886 |
|
|
|
886 |
|
Additional paid-in capital |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Retained loss |
|
|
(735,328 |
) |
|
|
(694,914 |
) |
Unearned employee benefits |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(8 |
) |
Accumulated other comprehensive loss |
|
|
(37,577 |
) |
|
|
(35,671 |
) |
Treasury stock: 5,228,055 and 6,040,958 shares at June 30, 2010 and |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2009, respectively |
|
|
(145,973 |
) |
|
|
(153,306 |
) |
|
Total stockholders deficit |
|
|
(917,992 |
) |
|
|
(883,013 |
) |
|
Total liabilities, mezzanine equity and stockholders deficit |
|
$ |
5,461,203 |
|
|
$ |
5,929,663 |
|
|
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
3
MONEYGRAM INTERNATIONAL, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME (LOSS)
UNAUDITED
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30, |
|
Six Months Ended June 30, |
(Amounts in thousands, except per share data) |
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
REVENUE |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fee and other revenue |
|
$ |
277,644 |
|
|
$ |
278,493 |
|
|
$ |
558,510 |
|
|
$ |
546,637 |
|
Investment revenue |
|
|
6,253 |
|
|
|
8,455 |
|
|
|
11,891 |
|
|
|
20,146 |
|
Net securities (losses) gains |
|
|
(277 |
) |
|
|
4,233 |
|
|
|
2,115 |
|
|
|
4,289 |
|
|
Total revenue |
|
|
283,620 |
|
|
|
291,181 |
|
|
|
572,516 |
|
|
|
571,072 |
|
|
Fee and other commissions expense |
|
|
120,248 |
|
|
|
121,764 |
|
|
|
242,658 |
|
|
|
240,308 |
|
Investment commissions expense |
|
|
216 |
|
|
|
354 |
|
|
|
420 |
|
|
|
753 |
|
|
Total commissions expense |
|
|
120,464 |
|
|
|
122,118 |
|
|
|
243,078 |
|
|
|
241,061 |
|
|
Net revenue |
|
|
163,156 |
|
|
|
169,063 |
|
|
|
329,438 |
|
|
|
330,011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EXPENSES |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Compensation and benefits |
|
|
55,225 |
|
|
|
47,639 |
|
|
|
112,787 |
|
|
|
99,271 |
|
Transaction and operations support |
|
|
48,579 |
|
|
|
71,166 |
|
|
|
96,165 |
|
|
|
115,650 |
|
Occupancy, equipment and supplies |
|
|
10,975 |
|
|
|
12,237 |
|
|
|
22,144 |
|
|
|
23,263 |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
27,440 |
|
|
|
26,649 |
|
|
|
51,847 |
|
|
|
53,689 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
11,876 |
|
|
|
14,962 |
|
|
|
24,387 |
|
|
|
29,324 |
|
|
Total expenses |
|
|
154,095 |
|
|
|
172,653 |
|
|
|
307,330 |
|
|
|
321,197 |
|
|
Income (loss) before income taxes |
|
|
9,061 |
|
|
|
(3,590 |
) |
|
|
22,108 |
|
|
|
8,814 |
|
Income tax expense (benefit) |
|
|
2,213 |
|
|
|
(273 |
) |
|
|
4,448 |
|
|
|
290 |
|
|
NET INCOME (LOSS) |
|
$ |
6,848 |
|
|
$ |
(3,317 |
) |
|
$ |
17,660 |
|
|
$ |
8,524 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BASIC AND DILUTED LOSS PER COMMON SHARE |
|
$ |
(0.31 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.40 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.57 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.60 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss available to common stockholders: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) as reported |
|
$ |
6,848 |
|
|
$ |
(3,317 |
) |
|
$ |
17,660 |
|
|
$ |
8,524 |
|
Accrued preferred stock dividends |
|
|
(30,667 |
) |
|
|
(27,116 |
) |
|
|
(60,036 |
) |
|
|
(52,834 |
) |
Accretion recognized on preferred stock |
|
|
(1,979 |
) |
|
|
(2,540 |
) |
|
|
(4,824 |
) |
|
|
(5,041 |
) |
|
Net loss available to common stockholders |
|
$ |
(25,798 |
) |
|
$ |
(32,973 |
) |
|
$ |
(47,200 |
) |
|
$ |
(49,351 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-average outstanding common shares |
|
|
83,266 |
|
|
|
82,504 |
|
|
|
82,951 |
|
|
|
82,493 |
|
|
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
4
MONEYGRAM INTERNATIONAL, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
UNAUDITED
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30, |
|
Six Months Ended June 30, |
(Amounts in thousands) |
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
NET INCOME (LOSS) |
|
$ |
6,848 |
|
|
$ |
(3,317 |
) |
|
$ |
17,660 |
|
|
$ |
8,524 |
|
OTHER COMPREHENSIVE (LOSS) INCOME |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net unrealized (losses) gains on available-for-sale securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net holding (losses) gains arising during the period |
|
|
(2,509 |
) |
|
|
1,641 |
|
|
|
331 |
|
|
|
3,094 |
|
Reclassification adjustment for net realized losses included
in net income (loss) |
|
|
277 |
|
|
|
850 |
|
|
|
334 |
|
|
|
2,931 |
|
|
|
|
|
(2,232 |
) |
|
|
2,491 |
|
|
|
665 |
|
|
|
6,025 |
|
|
Net unrealized losses on derivative financial instruments: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net holding losses arising during the period, net of tax benefit of
$304 and $478 for the three and six months ended June 30, 2009,
respectively |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(496 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(780 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(496 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(780 |
) |
|
Pension and postretirement benefit plans: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reclassification of prior service costs (credit) recorded to net
income (loss), net of tax benefit of $8 and $0 for the three months
ended June 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively, and $16 and $0 for
the six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively |
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
26 |
|
|
|
(2 |
) |
Reclassification of net actuarial loss recorded to net income (loss),
net of tax benefit of $456 and $359, for the three months ended
June 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively, and $1,002 and $717 for the
six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively |
|
|
744 |
|
|
|
585 |
|
|
|
1,635 |
|
|
|
1,171 |
|
Unrealized foreign currency translation (losses) gains, net of tax
(benefit) expense of $(1,688) and $816 for the three months ended
June 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively, and $(2,594) and $(169) for the
six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively |
|
|
(2,755 |
) |
|
|
1,331 |
|
|
|
(4,232 |
) |
|
|
(276 |
) |
|
Other comprehensive (loss) income |
|
|
(4,230 |
) |
|
|
3,910 |
|
|
|
(1,906 |
) |
|
|
6,138 |
|
|
COMPREHENSIVE INCOME |
|
$ |
2,618 |
|
|
$ |
593 |
|
|
$ |
15,754 |
|
|
$ |
14,662 |
|
|
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
5
MONEYGRAM INTERNATIONAL, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
UNAUDITED
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30, |
|
Six Months Ended June 30, |
(Amounts in thousands) |
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) |
|
$ |
6,848 |
|
|
$ |
(3,317 |
) |
|
$ |
17,660 |
|
|
$ |
8,524 |
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
provided by (used in) operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
11,876 |
|
|
|
14,962 |
|
|
|
24,387 |
|
|
|
29,324 |
|
Investment impairment charges |
|
|
277 |
|
|
|
848 |
|
|
|
334 |
|
|
|
2,929 |
|
Net realized gain on investments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,073 |
) |
|
|
(2,449 |
) |
|
|
(3,073 |
) |
Unrealized losses on trading investments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,790 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,435 |
|
Valuation gains on put options related to trading investments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6,798 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(10,580 |
) |
Provision for deferred income taxes |
|
|
102 |
|
|
|
610 |
|
|
|
102 |
|
|
|
305 |
|
Net amortization of investment premiums and discounts |
|
|
55 |
|
|
|
216 |
|
|
|
149 |
|
|
|
428 |
|
Impairment of goodwill |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,758 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,758 |
|
Signing bonus amortization |
|
|
7,042 |
|
|
|
8,554 |
|
|
|
14,372 |
|
|
|
17,083 |
|
Amortization of debt discount and deferred financing costs |
|
|
5,854 |
|
|
|
2,496 |
|
|
|
8,296 |
|
|
|
4,946 |
|
Provision for uncollectible receivables |
|
|
1,432 |
|
|
|
11,530 |
|
|
|
3,897 |
|
|
|
15,207 |
|
Non-cash compensation and pension expense |
|
|
8,675 |
|
|
|
3,893 |
|
|
|
17,876 |
|
|
|
6,454 |
|
Other non-cash items, net |
|
|
1,120 |
|
|
|
(213 |
) |
|
|
1,223 |
|
|
|
3,019 |
|
Changes in foreign currency translation adjustments |
|
|
(2,754 |
) |
|
|
1,331 |
|
|
|
(4,232 |
) |
|
|
(276 |
) |
Change in other assets |
|
|
(6,766 |
) |
|
|
(10,764 |
) |
|
|
(19,670 |
) |
|
|
(14,303 |
) |
Change in accounts payable and other liabilities |
|
|
(1,650 |
) |
|
|
23,236 |
|
|
|
(13,575 |
) |
|
|
24,233 |
|
|
Total adjustments |
|
|
25,263 |
|
|
|
55,376 |
|
|
|
30,710 |
|
|
|
85,889 |
|
Change in cash and cash equivalents (substantially restricted) |
|
|
186,352 |
|
|
|
(68,903 |
) |
|
|
284,677 |
|
|
|
103,696 |
|
Change in trading investments and related put options
(substantially restricted) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
17,900 |
|
|
|
29,400 |
|
|
|
17,900 |
|
Change in receivables, net (substantially restricted) |
|
|
(88,859 |
) |
|
|
7,265 |
|
|
|
95 |
|
|
|
151,290 |
|
Change in payment service obligations |
|
|
(100,154 |
) |
|
|
12,774 |
|
|
|
(370,826 |
) |
|
|
(358,058 |
) |
|
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities |
|
|
29,450 |
|
|
|
21,095 |
|
|
|
(8,284 |
) |
|
|
9,241 |
|
|
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from maturities of investments classified as available-for-sale |
|
|
39,249 |
|
|
|
58,678 |
|
|
|
82,572 |
|
|
|
81,538 |
|
Purchases of property and equipment |
|
|
(9,152 |
) |
|
|
(9,148 |
) |
|
|
(15,476 |
) |
|
|
(16,319 |
) |
Cash paid for acquisitions, net of cash acquired |
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(330 |
) |
|
|
(3,210 |
) |
|
Net cash provided by investing activities |
|
|
30,108 |
|
|
|
49,530 |
|
|
|
66,766 |
|
|
|
62,009 |
|
|
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from exercise of stock options |
|
|
442 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,518 |
|
|
|
|
|
Payments on debt |
|
|
(60,000 |
) |
|
|
(625 |
) |
|
|
(60,000 |
) |
|
|
(1,250 |
) |
Payments on revolving credit facility |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(70,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(70,000 |
) |
|
Net cash used in financing activities |
|
|
(59,558 |
) |
|
|
(70,625 |
) |
|
|
(58,482 |
) |
|
|
(71,250 |
) |
|
NET CHANGE IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS Beginning of period |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS End of period |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
6
MONEYGRAM INTERNATIONAL, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF STOCKHOLDERS DEFICIT
UNAUDITED
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional |
|
|
|
|
|
Unearned |
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common |
|
Paid-In |
|
Retained |
|
Employee |
|
Comprehensive |
|
Treasury |
|
|
(Amounts in thousands) |
|
Stock |
|
Capital |
|
Loss |
|
Benefits |
|
Loss |
|
Stock |
|
Total |
|
December 31, 2009 |
|
$ |
886 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(694,914 |
) |
|
$ |
(8 |
) |
|
$ |
(35,671 |
) |
|
$ |
(153,306 |
) |
|
$ |
(883,013 |
) |
Net income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17,660 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17,660 |
|
Accrued dividends on preferred stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6,680 |
) |
|
|
(53,356 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(60,036 |
) |
Accretion on preferred stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,824 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,824 |
) |
Employee benefit plans |
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,504 |
|
|
|
(4,718 |
) |
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,333 |
|
|
|
14,127 |
|
Net unrealized gain on available-for-sale securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
665 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
665 |
|
Amortization of prior service cost for pension and
postretirement benefits, net of tax |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26 |
|
Amortization of unrealized losses on pension and
postretirement benefits, net of tax |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,635 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,635 |
|
Unrealized foreign currency translation adjustment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,232 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,232 |
) |
|
June 30, 2010 |
|
$ |
886 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(735,328 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(37,577 |
) |
|
$ |
(145,973 |
) |
|
$ |
(917,992 |
) |
|
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
7
MONEYGRAM INTERNATIONAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
Note 1 Basis of Presentation
The accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements of MoneyGram International, Inc.
(MoneyGram or the Company) have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles
generally accepted in the United States of America and the instructions to Form 10-Q and Rule 10-01
of Regulation S-X. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and notes required for
complete financial statements. In the opinion of management, all adjustments considered necessary
for a fair presentation have been included and are of a normal recurring nature. Operating results
for the three and six months ended June 30, 2010, are not necessarily indicative of the results
that may be expected for future periods. For further information, refer to the Consolidated
Financial Statements and Notes thereto included in the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the
year ended December 31, 2009.
Note 2 Assets in Excess of Payment Service Obligations
The following table shows the amount of assets in excess of payment service obligations at June 30,
2010 and December 31, 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
December 31, |
(Amounts in thousands) |
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents (substantially restricted) |
|
$ |
3,492,147 |
|
|
$ |
3,776,824 |
|
Receivables, net (substantially restricted) |
|
|
1,047,768 |
|
|
|
1,054,381 |
|
Trading investments and related put options (substantially restricted) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
26,951 |
|
Available-for-sale investments (substantially restricted) |
|
|
216,894 |
|
|
|
298,633 |
|
|
|
|
|
4,756,809 |
|
|
|
5,156,789 |
|
Payment service obligations |
|
|
(4,472,692 |
) |
|
|
(4,843,454 |
) |
|
Assets in excess of payment service obligations |
|
$ |
284,117 |
|
|
$ |
313,335 |
|
|
The Company was in compliance with its contractual and financial regulatory requirements as of
June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009.
Note 3 Acquisitions and Disposals
Blue Dolphin Financial Services N.V. On February 5, 2010, the Company acquired Blue Dolphin
Financial Services N.V. (Blue Dolphin), a former super-agent in the Netherlands, for a purchase
price of $1.4 million, including cash acquired of $1.1 million, and an earn-out potential of up to
$1.4 million. The acquisition of Blue Dolphin provides the Company with the opportunity for further
network expansion in the Netherlands and Belgium under the European Union Payment Services
Directive, as well as additional control over sales and marketing activities.
The preliminary purchase price allocation includes $3.1 million of goodwill assigned to the
Companys Global Funds Transfer segment, and the forgiveness of $2.7 million of liabilities. The
purchase price allocation is preliminary pending the completion of the valuation of deferred taxes
and certain other liabilities. The Company incurred $0.1 million of transaction costs related to
this acquisition in the six months ended June 30, 2010, which are included in the Transaction and
operations support line in the Consolidated Statements of Income (Loss). The operating results of
Blue Dolphin subsequent to the acquisition date are included in the Companys Consolidated
Statements of Income (Loss). The financial impact of the acquisition is not material to the
Consolidated Balance Sheets or Consolidated Statements of Income (Loss).
Other Disposals During the second quarter of 2010, the Company recognized a $1.5 million
impairment on the Companys corporate airplane in the Transaction and operations support line in
the Consolidated Statements of Income (Loss). This impairment is based on approximately $7.5
million of net proceeds from the sale of the corporate airplane in July 2010.
Note 4 Fair Value Measurement
Following is a description of the Companys valuation methodologies for financial assets measured
at fair value:
Investments For United States government agencies and residential mortgage-backed securities
collateralized by United States government agency securities, fair value measures are generally
obtained from independent sources, including a pricing service. Because market quotes are generally
not readily available or accessible for these specific securities, the pricing service generally
measures fair value through the use of pricing models and observable inputs for similar assets and
market data. Accordingly, these securities are classified as Level 2 financial instruments. The
Company periodically corroborates the valuations provided by the pricing service through internal
valuations utilizing externally developed cash flow models, comparison to actual transaction prices
for any sold securities and any broker quotes received on the same security.
8
For other asset-backed securities, investments in limited partnerships and trading investments,
market quotes are generally not available. If available, the Company will utilize a fair value
measurement from a pricing service. The pricing service utilizes a pricing model based on market
observable data and indices, such as quotes for comparable securities, yield curves, default
indices, interest rates and historical prepayment speeds. If a fair value measurement is not
available from the pricing service, the Company will utilize a broker quote if available. Due to a
general lack of transparency in the process that the brokers use to develop prices, most valuations
that are based on brokers quotes are classified as Level 3. If no broker quote is available, or if
such quote cannot be corroborated by market data or internal valuations, the Company will perform
internal valuations utilizing externally developed cash flow models. These pricing models are based
on market observable spreads and, when available, observable market indices. The pricing models
also use inputs such as the rate of future prepayments and expected default rates on the principal,
which are derived by the Company based on the characteristics of the underlying structure and
historical prepayment speeds experienced at the interest rate levels projected for the underlying
collateral. The pricing models for certain asset-backed securities also include significant
non-observable inputs such as internally assessed credit ratings for non-rated securities, combined
with externally provided credit spreads. Observability of market inputs to the valuation models
used for pricing certain of the Companys investments deteriorated with the disruption to the
credit markets as overall liquidity and trading activity in these sectors has been substantially
reduced. Accordingly, securities valued using a pricing model are classified as Level 3 financial
instruments.
Derivatives Derivatives consist of forward contracts to hedge income statement exposure to
foreign currency exchange risk arising from the Companys assets and liabilities denominated in
foreign currencies. The Companys derivative agreements are well-established products, allowing the
use of standardized models that use market based inputs. These models do not contain a high level
of subjectivity and the inputs are readily observable. Accordingly, the Company has classified its
forward contracts as Level 2 financial instruments.
Other Financial Instruments Other financial instruments consisted of put options related to
trading investments. The fair value of the put options related to trading investments was estimated
using the expected cash flows from the instruments assuming their exercise in June 2010. These cash
flows were discounted at a rate corroborated by market data for a financial institution comparable
to the put option counter-party, as well as the Companys interest rate on its debt. The discounted
cash flows of the put options were then reduced by the estimated fair value of the trading
investments. Given the subjectivity of the discount rate and the estimated fair value of the
trading investments, the Company had classified its put options related to trading investments as
Level 3 financial instruments. The fair value of the put options was remeasured each period, with
the change in fair value recognized in earnings.
Debt Debt is carried at amortized cost; however, the Company estimates the fair value of debt for
disclosure purposes. The fair value of debt is estimated using market quotations, where available,
credit ratings, observable market indices and other market data. As of June 30, 2010, the fair
value of Tranche A and Tranche B under the Companys senior facility is estimated at $95.2 million
and $141.9 million, respectively. As of June 30, 2010, the fair value of the Companys second lien
notes is estimated at $490.0 million. See Note 8 Debt for more information on the Companys debt.
The Company had no financial liabilities recorded at fair value as of June 30, 2010 and December
31, 2009. Following are the Companys financial assets recorded at fair value by hierarchy level as
of June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2010 |
(Amounts in thousands) |
|
Level 1 |
|
Level 2 |
|
Level 3 |
|
Total |
|
Available-for-sale investments (substantially restricted): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
United States government agencies |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
8,490 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
8,490 |
|
Residential mortgage-backed securities agencies |
|
|
|
|
|
|
187,650 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
187,650 |
|
Other asset-backed securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20,754 |
|
|
|
20,754 |
|
Forward contracts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
349 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
349 |
|
|
Total financial assets |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
196,489 |
|
|
$ |
20,754 |
|
|
$ |
217,243 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2009 |
(Amounts in thousands) |
|
Level 1 |
|
Level 2 |
|
Level 3 |
|
Total |
|
Trading investments and related put options
(substantially restricted) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
26,951 |
|
|
$ |
26,951 |
|
Available-for-sale investments (substantially restricted): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
United States government agencies |
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,715 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,715 |
|
Residential mortgage-backed securities agencies |
|
|
|
|
|
|
268,830 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
268,830 |
|
Other asset-backed securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22,088 |
|
|
|
22,088 |
|
Forward contracts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,332 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,332 |
|
|
Total financial assets |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
281,877 |
|
|
$ |
49,039 |
|
|
$ |
330,916 |
|
|
9
The tables below provide a roll-forward for the three and six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009
of the financial assets classified in Level 3, which are measured at fair value on a recurring
basis.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
June 30, 2010 |
|
June 30, 2010 |
|
|
Trading |
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
Trading |
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
Investments |
|
Other |
|
Level 3 |
|
Investments |
|
Other |
|
Level 3 |
|
|
and Related |
|
Asset-Backed |
|
Financial |
|
and Related |
|
Asset-Backed |
|
Financial |
(Amounts in thousands) |
|
Put Options |
|
Securities |
|
Assets |
|
Put Options |
|
Securities |
|
Assets |
|
Beginning balance |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
23,833 |
|
|
$ |
23,833 |
|
|
$ |
26,951 |
|
|
$ |
22,088 |
|
|
$ |
49,039 |
|
Realized gains |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,449 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,449 |
|
Realized losses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Principal paydowns |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,204 |
) |
|
|
(2,204 |
) |
|
|
(29,400 |
) |
|
|
(3,113 |
) |
|
|
(32,513 |
) |
Other-than-temporary impairments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(277 |
) |
|
|
(277 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(334 |
) |
|
|
(334 |
) |
Unrealized gains instruments still
held at the reporting date |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,263 |
|
|
|
1,263 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,314 |
|
|
|
4,314 |
|
Unrealized losses instruments still
held at the reporting date |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,861 |
) |
|
|
(1,861 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,201 |
) |
|
|
(2,201 |
) |
|
Ending balance |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
20,754 |
|
|
$ |
20,754 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
20,754 |
|
|
$ |
20,754 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
June 30, 2009 |
|
June 30, 2009 |
|
|
Trading |
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
Trading |
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
Investments |
|
Other |
|
Level 3 |
|
Investments |
|
Other |
|
Level 3 |
|
|
and Related |
|
Asset-Backed |
|
Financial |
|
and Related |
|
Asset-Backed |
|
Financial |
(Amounts in thousands) |
|
Put Options |
|
Securities |
|
Assets |
|
Put Options |
|
Securities |
|
Assets |
|
Beginning balance |
|
$ |
50,127 |
|
|
$ |
25,254 |
|
|
$ |
75,381 |
|
|
$ |
47,990 |
|
|
$ |
29,528 |
|
|
$ |
77,518 |
|
Principal paydowns |
|
|
(14,826 |
) |
|
|
(161 |
) |
|
|
(14,987 |
) |
|
|
(14,826 |
) |
|
|
(297 |
) |
|
|
(15,123 |
) |
Other-than-temporary impairments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(848 |
) |
|
|
(848 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,929 |
) |
|
|
(2,929 |
) |
Unrealized gains instruments still
held at the reporting date |
|
|
6,798 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,798 |
|
|
|
10,580 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,580 |
|
Unrealized losses instruments still
held at the reporting date |
|
|
(4,790 |
) |
|
|
(1,540 |
) |
|
|
(6,330 |
) |
|
|
(6,435 |
) |
|
|
(3,597 |
) |
|
|
(10,032 |
) |
|
Ending balance |
|
$ |
37,309 |
|
|
$ |
22,705 |
|
|
$ |
60,014 |
|
|
$ |
37,309 |
|
|
$ |
22,705 |
|
|
$ |
60,014 |
|
|
Note 5 Investment Portfolio
Components of the Companys investment portfolio are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
December 31, |
(Amounts in thousands) |
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
Cash |
|
$ |
996,368 |
|
|
$ |
1,243,060 |
|
Money markets |
|
|
1,494,858 |
|
|
|
1,933,764 |
|
Deposits |
|
|
1,000,921 |
|
|
|
600,000 |
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents (substantially restricted) |
|
|
3,492,147 |
|
|
|
3,776,824 |
|
Trading investments and related put options (substantially restricted) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
26,951 |
|
Available-for-sale investments (substantially restricted) |
|
|
216,894 |
|
|
|
298,633 |
|
|
Total investment portfolio |
|
$ |
3,709,041 |
|
|
$ |
4,102,408 |
|
|
Cash and Cash Equivalents (substantially restricted) Cash and cash equivalents consist of cash,
money-market securities, time deposits and certificates of deposit. Cash primarily consists of
interest-bearing deposit accounts and non-interest bearing transaction accounts. The Companys
money-market securities are invested in six funds, all of which are AAA rated and consist of United
States
Treasury bills, notes or other obligations issued or guaranteed by the United States government and
its agencies, as well as repurchase agreements secured by such instruments. Deposits consist of
time deposits and certificates of deposits with maturities of less than one year or open-ended
maturity dates, and are issued from financial institutions that are rated AA as of the date of this
filing.
10
Trading Investments and Related Put Options (substantially restricted) At December 31, 2009, the
Company had one trading investment with a fair value of $11.8 million on a par value of
$29.4 million, and a related put option with a fair value of $15.2 million. The trading investment
was called at par in February 2010, resulting in a $2.4 million gain recorded in Net securities
(losses) gains, net of the reversal of the related put option.
Available-for-sale Investments (substantially restricted) Available-for-sale investments consist
of mortgage-backed securities, asset-backed securities and agency debenture securities. After
other-than-temporary impairment charges, the amortized cost and fair value of available-for-sale
investments are as follows at June 30, 2010:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross |
|
Gross |
|
|
|
|
|
Net |
|
|
Amortized |
|
Unrealized |
|
Unrealized |
|
Fair |
|
Average |
(Amounts in thousands, except net average price) |
|
Cost |
|
Gains |
|
Losses |
|
Value |
|
Price |
|
Residential mortgage-backed securities-agencies |
|
$ |
179,750 |
|
|
$ |
7,989 |
|
|
$ |
(89 |
) |
|
$ |
187,650 |
|
|
$ |
105.01 |
|
Other asset-backed securities |
|
|
12,909 |
|
|
|
7,845 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20,754 |
|
|
|
3.70 |
|
United States government agencies |
|
|
7,060 |
|
|
|
1,430 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,490 |
|
|
|
94.34 |
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
199,719 |
|
|
$ |
17,264 |
|
|
$ |
(89 |
) |
|
$ |
216,894 |
|
|
$ |
29.00 |
|
|
After other-than-temporary impairment charges, the amortized cost and fair value of
available-for-sale investments were as follows at December 31, 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross |
|
Gross |
|
|
|
|
|
Net |
|
|
Amortized |
|
Unrealized |
|
Unrealized |
|
Fair |
|
Average |
(Amounts in thousands, except net average price) |
|
Cost |
|
Gains |
|
Losses |
|
Value |
|
Price |
|
Residential mortgage-backed securities agencies |
|
$ |
259,563 |
|
|
$ |
9,296 |
|
|
$ |
(29 |
) |
|
$ |
268,830 |
|
|
$ |
104.13 |
|
Other asset-backed securities |
|
|
15,706 |
|
|
|
6,382 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22,088 |
|
|
|
3.74 |
|
United States government agencies |
|
|
6,854 |
|
|
|
861 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,715 |
|
|
|
85.72 |
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
282,123 |
|
|
$ |
16,539 |
|
|
$ |
(29 |
) |
|
$ |
298,633 |
|
|
$ |
34.84 |
|
|
At June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, approximately 90 percent and 93 percent, respectively, of
the available-for-sale portfolio is invested in debentures of United States government agencies or
securities collateralized by United States government agency debentures. These securities have the
implicit backing of the United States government and the Company expects to receive full par value
upon maturity or pay-down, as well as all interest payments. The Other asset-backed securities
continue to have market exposure. The Company has factored this risk into its fair value estimates,
with the average price of an asset-backed security at $0.04 per dollar of par at June 30, 2010.
Gains and Losses and Other-Than-Temporary Impairments At June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, net
unrealized gains of $17.2 million and $16.5 million, respectively, are included in the Consolidated
Balance Sheets in Accumulated other comprehensive loss. During each of the three and six month
periods ended June 30, 2010, losses of $0.3 million, and during the three and six months ended June
30, 2009, losses of $0.9 million and $2.9 million, respectively, were reclassified from
Accumulated other comprehensive loss to net income (loss) in connection with other-than-temporary
impairments and realized losses recognized during the period. Net securities (losses) gains were as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
June 30, |
|
June 30, |
(Amounts in thousands) |
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
Gross realized losses from available-for-sale investments |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(2 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(2 |
) |
Other-than-temporary impairments from available-for-sale
investments |
|
|
(277 |
) |
|
|
(848 |
) |
|
|
(334 |
) |
|
|
(2,929 |
) |
Net unrealized gains from trading investments and related put
options |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,145 |
|
Realized gains from trading investments and related put options |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,075 |
|
|
|
2,449 |
|
|
|
3,075 |
|
|
Net securities (losses) gains |
|
$ |
(277 |
) |
|
$ |
4,233 |
|
|
$ |
2,115 |
|
|
$ |
4,289 |
|
|
Investment Ratings In rating the securities in its investment portfolio, the Company uses ratings
from Moodys Investor Service (Moodys), Standard & Poors (S&P) and Fitch Ratings (Fitch). If
the rating agencies have split ratings, the Company uses the highest rating from either Moodys or
S&P for disclosure purposes. Securities issued or backed by United States government agencies are
included in the AAA rating category. Investment grade is defined as a security having a Moodys
equivalent rating of Aaa, Aa, A or Baa or an S&P or Fitch equivalent rating of AAA, AA, A or BBB.
The Companys investments at June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009 consisted of the following
ratings:
11
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2010 |
|
December 31, 2009 |
|
|
Number of |
|
Fair |
|
Percent of |
|
Number of |
|
Fair |
|
Percent of |
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Securities |
|
Value |
|
Investments |
|
Securities |
|
Value |
|
Investments |
|
AAA, including United States agencies |
|
|
31 |
|
|
$ |
195,793 |
|
|
|
90 |
% |
|
|
34 |
|
|
$ |
276,215 |
|
|
|
92 |
% |
A |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
% |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
415 |
|
|
|
0 |
% |
BBB |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
1,406 |
|
|
|
1 |
% |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
1,842 |
|
|
|
1 |
% |
Below investment grade |
|
|
67 |
|
|
|
19,695 |
|
|
|
9 |
% |
|
|
69 |
|
|
|
20,161 |
|
|
|
7 |
% |
|
Total |
|
|
99 |
|
|
$ |
216,894 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
105 |
|
|
$ |
298,633 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
Had the Company used the lowest rating from either Moodys or S&P in the information presented
above, there would be no change to investments rated A or better.
Contractual Maturities The amortized cost and fair value of available-for-sale securities at June
30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, by contractual maturity, are shown below. Actual maturities may
differ from contractual maturities as borrowers may have the right to call or prepay obligations,
sometimes without call or prepayment penalties. Maturities of mortgage-backed and other
asset-backed securities depend on the repayment characteristics and experience of the underlying
obligations.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2010 |
|
December 31, 2009 |
|
|
Amortized |
|
Fair |
|
Amortized |
|
Fair |
(Amounts in thousands) |
|
Cost |
|
Value |
|
Cost |
|
Value |
|
After one year through five years |
|
$ |
7,060 |
|
|
$ |
8,490 |
|
|
$ |
6,854 |
|
|
$ |
7,715 |
|
Mortgage-backed and other asset-backed securities |
|
|
192,659 |
|
|
|
208,404 |
|
|
|
275,269 |
|
|
|
290,918 |
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
199,719 |
|
|
$ |
216,894 |
|
|
$ |
282,123 |
|
|
$ |
298,633 |
|
|
Note 6 Goodwill
Following is a roll forward of the Companys goodwill, which is all related to the Global Funds
Transfer segment:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
(Amounts in thousands) |
|
Goodwill |
|
Balance as of December 31, 2009 |
|
$ |
425,630 |
|
Goodwill acquired |
|
|
3,061 |
|
|
Balance as of June 30, 2010 |
|
$ |
428,691 |
|
|
The addition of goodwill relates to the acquisition of Blue Dolphin in the first quarter of 2010.
See Note 3 Acquisitions for further information on the acquisition.
Note 7 Derivative Financial Instruments
The Company uses forward contracts to hedge income statement exposure to foreign currency exchange
risk arising from its assets and liabilities denominated in foreign currencies. While these
contracts economically hedge foreign currency risk, they are not designated as hedges for
accounting purposes. The Transaction and operations support line in the Consolidated Statements
of Income (Loss) reflects losses of $2.1 million and $4.4 million for the three and six months
ended June 30, 2010, respectively, and losses of $1.1 million and $4.7 million for the three and
six months ended June 30, 2009, respectively. These losses reflect changes in foreign exchange
rates on foreign-denominated receivables and payables, and are net of gains of $5.9 million and
$10.1 million from the related forward contracts for the three and six months ended June 30, 2010,
respectively, and losses of $8.2 million and $2.4 million for the three and six months ended June
30, 2009, respectively. As of June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, the Company had $71.3 million
and $59.4 million, respectively, of outstanding notional amounts relating to its forward contracts.
At June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, the Company reflects the following fair values of
derivative forward contract instruments in
its Consolidated Balance Sheets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivative Assets |
|
Derivative Liabilities |
|
|
Balance Sheet |
|
June 30, |
|
December 31, |
|
June 30, |
|
December 31, |
(Amounts in thousands) |
|
Location |
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
Forward contracts |
|
Other assets |
|
$ |
361 |
|
|
$ |
5,361 |
|
|
$ |
12 |
|
|
$ |
29 |
|
|
Historically, the Company entered into foreign currency forward contracts with 12 month durations
to hedge forecasted foreign currency money transfer transactions. The Company designated these
forward contracts as cash flow hedges. All cash flow hedges matured in 2009. The Company recognized
a gain of $0.7 million and $2.4 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2009 in the
Fee and other revenue line of the Consolidated Statements of Income (Loss) upon the final
settlement of these cash flow hedges.
12
The Companys Series B Stock contains a change of control redemption option which, upon exercise,
requires the Company to cash settle the par value of the Series B Stock and any accumulated unpaid
dividends at a 1 percent premium. As the cash settlement is made at a premium, the change of
control redemption option meets the definition of an embedded derivative requiring bifurcation and
liability accounting treatment. The fair value of the change of control redemption option was de
minimus as of June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009.
Note 8 Debt
Following is a summary of the Companys outstanding debt as of June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2010 |
|
December 31, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted- |
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
(Amounts in thousands) |
|
Amount |
|
Interest Rate |
|
Amount |
|
Interest Rate |
|
Senior Tranche A Loan, due 2013 |
|
$ |
100,000 |
|
|
|
5.75 |
% |
|
$ |
100,000 |
|
|
|
5.75 |
% |
Senior Tranche B Loan, net of unamortized discount, due 2013 |
|
|
140,584 |
|
|
|
7.25 |
% |
|
|
196,791 |
|
|
|
7.25 |
% |
Senior revolving credit facility, due 2013 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Second lien notes, due 2018 |
|
|
500,000 |
|
|
|
13.25 |
% |
|
|
500,000 |
|
|
|
13.25 |
% |
|
Total debt |
|
$ |
740,584 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
796,791 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior Facility The Company may elect an interest rate for the senior facility at each reset
period based on the United States prime bank rate or the Eurodollar rate. During 2010 and 2009, the
Company elected the United States prime bank rate as its interest basis. During the second quarter
of 2010, the Company made two optional repayments totaling $60.0 million of its Tranche B loan. As
of June 30, 2010, the Company has $235.0 million of availability under the revolving credit
facility, net of $15.0 million of outstanding letters of credit. Amortization of the debt discount
on Tranche B of $3.1 million and $3.8 million during the three and six months ended June 30, 2010,
respectively, and $0.7 million and $1.4 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2009,
respectively, is recorded in Interest expense in the Consolidated Statements of Income (Loss).
Amortization of the debt discount for the three and six months ended June 30, 2010 includes a
pro-rata write-off of $2.4 million as a result of the Tranche B prepayment. At June 30, 2010 the
outstanding debt principal balance and unamortized discount balance are $746.3 million and $5.7
million, respectively.
Second Lien Notes Prior to March 25, 2011, the Company has the option to capitalize interest at a
rate of 15.25 percent for the second lien notes. If interest is capitalized, 0.50 percent of the
interest is payable in cash and 14.75 percent is capitalized into the outstanding principal
balance. The Company paid the interest through June 30, 2010, and anticipates that it will continue
to pay the interest on the Notes for the foreseeable future.
Debt Covenants At June 30, 2010, the Company is in compliance with its financial covenants.
Deferred Financing Costs Amortization of deferred financing costs of $2.8 million and $4.5
million during the three and six months ended June 30, 2010, respectively, and $1.8 million and
$3.5 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2009, respectively, is recorded in
Interest expense in the Consolidated Statements of Income (Loss). Amortization of the deferred
financing costs for the three and six months ended June 30, 2010 includes a pro-rata write-off of
$1.1 million as a result of the Tranche B prepayment.
Interest Paid in Cash The Company paid $21.3 million and $43.0 million of interest for the three
and six months ended June 30, 2010, respectively, and $24.0 million and $48.5 million for the three
and six months ended June 30, 2009, respectively.
Maturities At June 30, 2010, debt totaling $246.3 million will mature in 2013.
Note 9 Pensions and Other Benefits
Net periodic benefit expense for the Companys defined benefit pension plan and combined
supplemental executive retirement plans (SERPs) includes the following components:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
June 30, |
|
June 30, |
(Amounts in thousands) |
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
Service cost |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
223 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
446 |
|
Interest cost |
|
|
2,969 |
|
|
|
3,165 |
|
|
|
5,938 |
|
|
|
6,330 |
|
Expected return on plan assets |
|
|
(2,166 |
) |
|
|
(2,351 |
) |
|
|
(4,332 |
) |
|
|
(4,702 |
) |
Amortization of prior service cost |
|
|
21 |
|
|
|
87 |
|
|
|
42 |
|
|
|
174 |
|
Recognized net actuarial loss |
|
|
1,196 |
|
|
|
944 |
|
|
|
2,391 |
|
|
|
1,888 |
|
|
Net periodic benefit expense |
|
$ |
2,020 |
|
|
$ |
2,068 |
|
|
$ |
4,039 |
|
|
$ |
4,136 |
|
|
13
Benefits paid through the defined benefit pension plan were $3.1 million and $6.2 million for the
three and six months ended June 30, 2010, respectively, and $3.1 million and $6.3 million for the
three and six months ended June 30, 2009, respectively. No contributions were made to the defined
benefit pension plan during the six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009. Benefits paid through, and
contributions made to, the combined SERPs were $1.3 million and $2.4 million for the three and six
months ended June 30, 2010, respectively, and $1.0 million and $2.0 million for the three and six
months ended June 30, 2009, respectively.
The net loss for the defined benefit pension plan and combined SERPs that the Company amortized
from Accumulated other comprehensive loss into Net periodic benefit expense was $1.2 million
($0.7 million, net of tax) and $2.4 million ($1.5 million, net of tax) for the three and six months
ended June 30, 2010, respectively, and $0.9 million ($0.6 million, net of tax) and $1.9 million
($1.2 million, net of tax) for the three and six months ended June 30, 2009, respectively. The
prior service costs amortized from Accumulated other comprehensive loss into Net periodic
benefit expense was nominal for the defined benefit pension plan and combined SERPs for the three
and six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009.
Net periodic expense for the Companys defined benefit postretirement plans includes the following
components:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
June 30, |
|
June 30, |
(Amounts in thousands) |
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
Service cost |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
143 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
286 |
|
Interest cost |
|
|
63 |
|
|
|
209 |
|
|
|
127 |
|
|
|
418 |
|
Amortization of prior service credits |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(88 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(176 |
) |
Recognized net actuarial loss |
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net periodic benefit expense |
|
$ |
67 |
|
|
$ |
264 |
|
|
$ |
134 |
|
|
$ |
528 |
|
|
Benefits paid through, and contributions made to, the defined benefit postretirement plans were
$0.1 million and $0.5 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2010, respectively, and
$0.1 million for each of the three and six months ended June 30, 2009.
The net loss and prior service credit for the postretirement benefit plans that the Company
amortized from Accumulated other comprehensive loss into Net periodic benefit expense were
nominal for the three and six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009.
Contribution expense for the 401(k) defined contribution plan was $0.8 million and $1.6 million for
the three and six months ended June 30, 2010, respectively, compared to $0.8 million and $1.8
million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2009, respectively. The Company made a
discretionary profit sharing contribution of $2.0 million to the 401(k) defined contribution plan
in the six months ended June 30, 2009; no such contribution was made in 2010.
Deferred Compensation Plans During the second quarter of 2010, the Companys Board of Directors
approved changes to the Companys deferred compensation plans for management and non-employee
directors. Deferrals under the deferred compensation plan for management are frozen effective
April 1, 2010. The deferred compensation plan for directors was terminated and all account balances
will be fully distributed as soon as practicable following May 1, 2011.
Note 10 Mezzanine Equity
Following is a summary of mezzanine equity activity related to the Companys Participating
Convertible Preferred Stock during the six months ended June 30, 2010:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Amounts in thousands) |
|
B Stock |
|
B-1 Stock |
|
Series
B Stock |
|
Balance at December 31, 2009 |
|
$ |
539,084 |
|
|
$ |
325,244 |
|
|
$ |
864,328 |
|
Dividends accrued |
|
|
38,720 |
|
|
|
21,316 |
|
|
|
60,036 |
|
Accretion |
|
|
4,119 |
|
|
|
705 |
|
|
|
4,824 |
|
|
Balance at June 30, 2010 |
|
$ |
581,923 |
|
|
$ |
347,265 |
|
|
$ |
929,188 |
|
|
14
Note 11 Stockholders Deficit
Common Stock Following is a summary of common stock issued and outstanding:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
December 31, |
(Amounts in thousands) |
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
Common shares issued |
|
|
88,556 |
|
|
|
88,556 |
|
Treasury stock |
|
|
(5,228 |
) |
|
|
(6,041 |
) |
|
Common shares outstanding |
|
|
83,328 |
|
|
|
82,515 |
|
|
Treasury Stock Following is a summary of treasury stock share activity during the six months
ended June 30, 2010:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Treasury Stock |
(Amounts in thousands) |
|
Shares |
|
Balance at December 31, 2009 |
|
|
6,041 |
|
Exercise of stock options and release of restricted
stock, net of shares surrendered for withholding taxes |
|
|
(813 |
) |
|
Balance at June 30, 2010 |
|
|
5,228 |
|
|
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss The components of Accumulated other comprehensive loss are
as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
December 31, |
(Amounts in thousands) |
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
Net unrealized gains on securities classified as available-for-sale |
|
$ |
17,175 |
|
|
$ |
16,510 |
|
Cumulative foreign currency translation adjustments |
|
|
730 |
|
|
|
4,962 |
|
Prior service cost for pension and postretirement benefits, net of tax |
|
|
(197 |
) |
|
|
(223 |
) |
Unrealized losses on pension and postretirement benefits, net of tax |
|
|
(55,285 |
) |
|
|
(56,920 |
) |
|
Accumulated other comprehensive loss |
|
$ |
(37,577 |
) |
|
$ |
(35,671 |
) |
|
Note 12 Stock-Based Compensation
The Companys 2005 Omnibus Incentive Plan allows for the issuance under all awards of 47,000,000
shares of common stock. As of June 30, 2010, the Company has remaining authorization to issue
awards of up to 10,472,540 shares of common stock.
Stock Options Pursuant to the terms of options granted in 2010, 50 percent of the options become
exercisable through the passage of time (the Time-based Tranche) and 50 percent of the options
become exercisable upon the achievement of certain conditions (the Performance-based Tranche).
The Time-based Tranche generally becomes exercisable over a five-year period in either (a) an equal
number of shares each year or (b) a tranched vesting schedule whereby 15 percent of the Time-based
Tranche vests immediately and then at rates of 10 to 20 percent each year. The Performance-based
Tranche becomes exercisable upon the achievement within five years of grant of the earlier of (a) a
pre-defined common stock price for any period of 20 consecutive trading days, (b) a change in
control of the Company resulting in a pre-defined per share consideration or (c) in the event the
Companys common stock does not trade on a United States exchange or trading market, a public
offering resulting in the Companys common stock meeting pre-defined equity values. All options
granted in 2010 have a term of 10 years. These terms are consistent with options granted in 2009.
For purposes of determining the fair value of stock option awards, the Company uses the
Black-Scholes single option pricing model for the Time-based Tranches and a combination of
Monte-Carlo simulation and the Black-Scholes single option pricing model for the Performance-based
Tranches. Expected volatility is based on the historical volatility of the price of the Companys
common stock since the spin-off on June 30, 2004. Given the minimal stock option exercise activity
by grantees and volatility of the Companys stock price, the Company used the simplified method to
estimate the expected term of the awards, which represents the period of time that options are
expected to be outstanding, The Company used historical information to estimate the forfeiture
rate, which represents the number of options that will be forfeited by grantees due to termination
of employment. In addition, the Company considers any expectations regarding future activity which
could impact the expected term and forfeiture rate. The risk-free rate for the Black-Scholes model
is based on the United States Treasury yield curve in effect at the time of grant for periods
within the expected term of the option, while the risk-free rate for the Monte-Carlo simulation is
based on the five-year United States Treasury yield in effect at the time of grant. Compensation
cost, net of expected forfeitures, is recognized using a straight-line method over the vesting or
service period. The following table provides weighted-average grant-date fair value and assumptions
utilized to estimate the grant-date fair value of the 2010 options.
15
|
|
|
|
|
Expected dividend yield |
|
|
0.0 |
% |
Expected volatility |
|
|
73.6% - 74.8 |
% |
Risk-free interest rate |
|
|
2.4% - 3.3 |
% |
Expected life |
|
5.3-6.5 years |
Weighted-average grant-date fair value per option |
|
$ |
2.20 |
|
Following is a summary of stock option activity for 2010:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted- |
|
Average |
|
Aggregate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
Remaining |
|
Intrinsic |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercise |
|
Contractual |
|
Value |
|
|
Shares |
|
Price |
|
Term |
|
($000) |
|
Options outstanding at December 31, 2009 |
|
|
38,145,414 |
|
|
$ |
3.35 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Granted |
|
|
9,000,000 |
|
|
|
3.07 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercised |
|
|
(806,250 |
) |
|
|
1.88 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forfeited/Expired |
|
|
(9,358,267 |
) |
|
|
2.78 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options outstanding at June 30, 2010 |
|
|
36,980,897 |
|
|
$ |
3.46 |
|
|
8.85 years |
|
$ |
7,148 |
|
|
Vested or expected to vest at June 30, 2010 |
|
|
36,627,397 |
|
|
$ |
3.47 |
|
|
8.86 years |
|
$ |
7,119 |
|
|
Options exercisable at June 30, 2010 |
|
|
10,110,899 |
|
|
$ |
5.85 |
|
|
7.70 years |
|
$ |
2,576 |
|
|
As of June 30, 2010, the Companys outstanding stock options had unrecognized compensation expense
of $41.9 million and a remaining weighted-average vesting period of 1.48 years. The Company
recorded compensation expense related to stock options of $6.0 million and $12.8 million for the
three and six months ended June 30, 2010, respectively, and $1.7 million and $1.6 million for the
three and six months ended June 30, 2009, respectively.
Restricted Stock Units In May 2010, the Company granted an aggregate 223,888 of restricted stock
units to the Board of Directors, excluding the Chairman of the Board, as compensation for services
to be provided. The restricted stock units vest on the first anniversary of their issuance and may
only be settled in the Companys common stock. The restricted stock units were valued at the quoted
market price of the Companys common stock on the date of grant and are being expensed to the
Compensation and benefits line in the Consolidated Statements of Income (Loss) using the
straight-line method over the vesting period. Compensation expense related to restricted stock
units was $0.1 million in each of the three and six months ended June 30, 2010.
Note 13 Income Taxes
For the three months ended June 30, 2010, the Company had $2.2 million of income tax expense on
pre-tax income of $9.1 million, resulting in an effective income tax rate of 24.4 percent. For the
six months ended June 30, 2010, the Company had $4.4 million of income tax expense on pre-tax
income of $22.1 million, resulting in an effective income tax rate of 20.1 percent. The effective
income tax rate for the three and six months ended June 30, 2010 primarily reflects the reversal of
book-to-tax differences, including a litigation accrual. The Company paid $0.5 million and $0.8
million, of federal and state income taxes for the three and six months ended June 30, 2010,
respectively.
For the three months ended June 30, 2009, the Company had $0.3 million of tax benefit on a pre-tax
loss of $3.6 million, resulting in an effective income tax rate of 7.6 percent. For the six months
ended June 30, 2009, the Company had $0.3 million of tax expense on pre-tax income of $8.8 million,
resulting in an effective income tax rate of 3.3 percent. The effective income tax rate for the
three and six months ended June 30, 2009 reflects benefits recognized on tax positions with respect
to part of the net securities losses from 2008 and 2007. The Company received a federal income tax
refund of $43.5 million during the six months ended June 30, 2009. The Company paid $0.2 million of
federal and state income taxes for both the three and six months ended June 30, 2009.
For the three and six months ended June 30, 2010, the Company recognized $0.1 million and $0.2
million, respectively, in interest and penalties for unrecognized tax benefits, compared to $0.2
million for both the three and six months ended June 30, 2009. The Company records interest and
penalties for unrecognized tax benefits in Income tax expense (benefit) in the Consolidated
Statements of Income (Loss). As of June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, the Company had a liability
of $1.8 million and $1.7 million, respectively, for interest and penalties within Accounts payable
and other liabilities in the Consolidated Balance
Sheets.
During the quarter ended
June 30, 2010, the IRS completed its examination of our consolidated
income tax returns for 2005 to 2007, and issued its Revenue Agent
Report (RAR) challenging the Companys tax position
relating to net securities losses
and disallowing $687.0 million of deductions taken in the 2007 tax
return.
The Company disagrees with the RAR regarding the net securities
losses, and has filed a protest
letter and requested a conference with the IRS Appeals Office.
As of June 30, 2010, the Company has recognized a benefit of
approximately $95.0 million relating to its net securities losses.
16
Note 14 Commitments and Contingencies
Legal Proceedings The Company is involved in various claims, litigations and government inquiries
that arise from time to time in the ordinary course of the Companys business. All of these matters
are subject to uncertainties and outcomes that are not predictable with certainty. The Company
accrues for these matters as any resulting losses become probable and can be reasonably estimated.
Further, the Company maintains insurance coverage for many claims and litigations alleged.
Management does not believe that after final disposition any of these matters is likely to have a
material adverse impact on the Companys financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.
Federal Securities Class Actions As previously disclosed, on March 9, 2010, the Company and
certain of its present and former officers and directors entered into a Settlement Agreement,
subject to final approval of the court, to settle a consolidated class action case in the United
States District Court for the District of Minnesota captioned In re MoneyGram International, Inc.
Securities Litigation. The settlement provides for a cash payment of $80.0 million, all but $20.0
million of which would be paid by the Companys insurance carriers. At a hearing on June 18, 2010,
the Court issued a final order and judgment approving the settlement. The settlement became
effective on July 26, 2010, when the time to appeal the Courts final order and judgment expired
without any appeal having been filed. The Company paid $20.0 million into an escrow account in
March 2010 and the insurance carrier paid $60.0 million in April 2010, resulting in full settlement
of the Companys liability in this matter.
Minnesota Stockholder Derivative Claims Certain of the Companys present and former officers and
directors are defendants in a consolidated stockholder derivative action in the United States
District Court for the District of Minnesota captioned In re MoneyGram International, Inc.
Derivative Litigation. The Consolidated Complaint in this action, which was filed on November 18,
2009 and arises out of the same matters at issue in the securities class action, alleges claims on
behalf of the Company for, among other things, breach of fiduciary duties, unjust enrichment, abuse
of control, and gross mismanagement. On February 24, 2010, the parties entered into a non-binding
Memorandum of Understanding pursuant to which they agreed, subject to final approval of the parties
and the court, to settle this action. On March 31, 2010, the parties entered into a Stipulation of
Settlement agreeing to settle the case on terms largely consistent with the Memorandum of
Understanding. On April 1, 2010, the Court issued an Order that preliminarily approved the
settlement, providing for notice to stockholders and scheduled a hearing on the settlement for June
18, 2010. The Stipulation of Settlement provides for changes to the Companys business, corporate
governance and internal controls, some of which have already been implemented in whole or in part.
The Company also agreed to pay attorney fees and expenses to the plaintiffs counsel in the amount
of $1.3 million, with $1.0 million to be paid by the Companys insurance carriers. On June 21,
2010, the Court denied an objection to the settlement filed by a MoneyGram shareholder, Russel L.
Berney, and issued a final order and judgment approving the settlement. On July 20, 2010, Mr.
Berney filed a notice of appeal of the final order and judgment in the United States Court of
Appeals for the Eighth Circuit. The settlement was paid subsequent to the end of the second quarter
of 2010 and thus, the Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2009 and June 30, 2010 reflect
a $1.3 million liability in the Accounts payable and other liabilities line, with a $1.0 million
corresponding receivable from the insurance carriers in the Other assets line.
ERISA Class Action On April 22, 2008, Delilah Morrison, on behalf of herself and all other
MoneyGram 401(k) Plan participants, brought an action in the United States District Court for the
District of Minnesota. The complaint alleges claims under the Employee Retirement Income Security
Act of 1974, as amended (ERISA), including claims that the defendants breached fiduciary duties
by failing to manage the plans investment in Company stock, and by continuing to offer Company
stock as an investment option when the stock was no longer a prudent investment. The complaint also
alleges that defendants failed to provide complete and accurate information regarding Company stock
sufficient to advise plan participants of the risks involved with investing in Company stock and
breached fiduciary duties by failing to avoid conflicts of interests and to properly monitor the
performance of plan fiduciaries and fiduciary appointees. Finally, the complaint alleges that to
the extent that the Company is not a fiduciary, it is liable for knowingly participating in the
fiduciary breaches as alleged. On August 7, 2008, plaintiff amended the complaint to add an
additional plaintiff, name additional defendants and additional allegations. For relief, the
complaint seeks damages based on what the most profitable alternatives to Company stock would have
yielded, unspecified equitable relief, costs and attorneys fees. On March 25, 2009, the Court
granted in part and denied in part defendants motion to dismiss. On April 30, 2010, plaintiffs
filed a motion for class certification, which defendants opposed in a brief filed May 28, 2010. On
June 8, 2010, defendants filed a motion for partial summary judgment. Both motions are scheduled
for hearing before the Court on October 22, 2010.
17
California Action On January 22, 2008, Russell L. Berney filed a complaint in Los Angeles
Superior Court against the Company and its officers and directors, Thomas H. Lee Partners, L.P.,
and PropertyBridge, Inc. and two of its officers, alleging false and negligent misrepresentation,
violations of California securities laws and unfair business practices with regard to disclosure of
the Companys investments. The complaint also alleges derivative claims against the Companys Board
of Directors relating to the Boards oversight of disclosure of the Companys investments and with
regard to the Companys negotiations with Thomas H. Lee Partners, L.P. and Euronet Worldwide, Inc.
The complaint seeks monetary damages, disgorgement, restitution or rescission of stock purchases,
rescission of agreements with third parties, constructive trust and declaratory and injunctive
relief, as well as attorneys fees and costs. In July 2008, an amended complaint was filed
asserting an additional claim for declaratory relief. In September 2009, an amended complaint was
filed alleging additional facts and naming additional defendants. The settlement in the Minnesota
Stockholder Derivative Litigation and the Minnesota District Courts April 1, 2010 Order
preliminarily approving the settlement in the Minnesota Stockholder Derivative Litigation contain
provisions enjoining MoneyGram stockholders from commencing or continuing to prosecute any
litigation involving the claims to be settled in that case. On April 5, 2010, the California court
stayed proceedings in this action pending the settlement hearing in the Minnesota Stockholder
Derivative Litigation. The final order and judgment issued in connection with the Minnesota
Stockholder Derivative Litigation on June 21, 2010 enjoined Mr. Berney from prosecuting the
derivative claims alleged in the California Action that were settled in the Minnesota Stockholder
Action.
Minimum Commission Guarantees In limited circumstances, as an incentive to new or renewing
agents, the Company may grant minimum commission guarantees for a specified period of time at a
contractually specified amount. Under the guarantees, the Company will pay to the agent the
difference between the contractually specified minimum commission and actual commissions earned by
the agent. As of June 30, 2010, the liability for minimum commission guarantees was $1.8 million,
and the maximum amount that could be paid under the minimum commission guarantees was $4.0 million
over a weighted-average remaining term of
1.7 years.
Note 15 Earnings per Common Share
Following are the weighted-average potential common shares excluded from diluted earnings per
common share as their effect would be anti-dilutive:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
June 30, |
|
June 30, |
(Amounts in thousands) |
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
Shares related to stock options |
|
|
35,814 |
|
|
|
13,015 |
|
|
|
35,506 |
|
|
|
9,835 |
|
Shares related to restricted stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
21 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
42 |
|
Shares related to preferred stock |
|
|
405,763 |
|
|
|
358,771 |
|
|
|
405,763 |
|
|
|
358,771 |
|
Note 16 Recent Accounting Pronouncements
In June 2009, the FASB issued guidance that amends previously issued derecognition guidance for
financial transfers of assets, eliminates the exemption from consolidation for qualifying SPEs and
amends the consolidation guidance applicable to variable interest entities. This guidance is
effective for any financial transfers completed by the Company after January 1, 2010, and for
consolidated financial statements prepared subsequent to December 31, 2009. The Company adopted the
guidance effective January 1, 2010 with no material impact to its Consolidated Financial
Statements.
In March 2010, the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act and the Healthcare and Education
Reconciliation Act of 2010 (collectively, the Act) was signed into law. The Company has evaluated
the impact of the Act and has made the appropriate adjustments with no material impact to its
Consolidated Financial Statements.
18
Note 17 Segment Information
The Company conducts its business through two reportable segments, Global Funds Transfer and
Financial Paper Products. Businesses that are not operated within these segments are categorized as
Other, and primarily relate to discontinued products and businesses. One of the Companys agents
of both the Global Funds Transfer segment and the Financial Paper Products segment accounted for
29.7 percent and 28.8 percent of the Companys total revenue for the three months ended June 30,
2010 and 2009, respectively. The following tables set forth operating results, depreciation and
amortization and capital expenditures by segment:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
June 30, |
|
June 30, |
(Amounts in thousands) |
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
Revenue |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Global Funds Transfer: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Money transfer |
|
$ |
222,617 |
|
|
$ |
219,348 |
|
|
$ |
445,448 |
|
|
$ |
427,528 |
|
Bill payment |
|
|
31,039 |
|
|
|
32,124 |
|
|
|
64,902 |
|
|
|
68,371 |
|
|
Total Global Funds Transfer |
|
|
253,656 |
|
|
|
251,472 |
|
|
|
510,350 |
|
|
|
495,899 |
|
Financial Paper Products: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Money order |
|
|
17,666 |
|
|
|
20,148 |
|
|
|
35,570 |
|
|
|
37,905 |
|
Official check |
|
|
11,487 |
|
|
|
11,256 |
|
|
|
21,986 |
|
|
|
24,110 |
|
|
Total Financial Paper Products |
|
|
29,153 |
|
|
|
31,404 |
|
|
|
57,556 |
|
|
|
62,015 |
|
Other |
|
|
811 |
|
|
|
8,305 |
|
|
|
4,610 |
|
|
|
13,158 |
|
|
Total revenue |
|
$ |
283,620 |
|
|
$ |
291,181 |
|
|
$ |
572,516 |
|
|
$ |
571,072 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Segment operating income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Global Funds Transfer |
|
$ |
30,882 |
|
|
$ |
7,545 |
|
|
$ |
58,663 |
|
|
$ |
44,437 |
|
Financial Paper Products |
|
|
11,573 |
|
|
|
10,126 |
|
|
|
20,477 |
|
|
|
17,406 |
|
Other |
|
|
(555 |
) |
|
|
(1,149 |
) |
|
|
(1,074 |
) |
|
|
(1,399 |
) |
|
Total segment operating income |
|
|
41,900 |
|
|
|
16,522 |
|
|
|
78,066 |
|
|
|
60,444 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net securities (losses) gains |
|
|
(277 |
) |
|
|
4,233 |
|
|
|
2,115 |
|
|
|
4,289 |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
(27,440 |
) |
|
|
(26,649 |
) |
|
|
(51,847 |
) |
|
|
(53,689 |
) |
Other unallocated expenses |
|
|
(5,122 |
) |
|
|
2,304 |
|
|
|
(6,226 |
) |
|
|
(2,230 |
) |
|
Income (loss) before income taxes |
|
$ |
9,061 |
|
|
$ |
(3,590 |
) |
|
$ |
22,108 |
|
|
$ |
8,814 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Global Funds Transfer |
|
$ |
9,132 |
|
|
$ |
9,159 |
|
|
$ |
18,944 |
|
|
$ |
20,549 |
|
Financial Paper Products |
|
|
2,744 |
|
|
|
5,490 |
|
|
|
5,434 |
|
|
|
8,112 |
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
313 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
663 |
|
|
Total depreciation and amortization |
|
$ |
11,876 |
|
|
$ |
14,962 |
|
|
$ |
24,387 |
|
|
$ |
29,324 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital expenditures: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Global Funds Transfer |
|
$ |
8,618 |
|
|
$ |
5,211 |
|
|
$ |
14,425 |
|
|
$ |
11,334 |
|
Financial Paper Products |
|
|
2,621 |
|
|
|
3,614 |
|
|
|
3,731 |
|
|
|
4,170 |
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total capital expenditures |
|
$ |
11,239 |
|
|
$ |
8,825 |
|
|
$ |
18,156 |
|
|
$ |
15,504 |
|
|
The following table presents revenue by major geographic area:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
June 30, |
|
June 30, |
(Amounts in thousands) |
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
United States |
|
$ |
194,857 |
|
|
$ |
201,649 |
|
|
$ |
397,494 |
|
|
$ |
401,100 |
|
International |
|
|
88,763 |
|
|
|
89,532 |
|
|
|
175,022 |
|
|
|
169,972 |
|
|
Total revenue |
|
$ |
283,620 |
|
|
$ |
291,181 |
|
|
$ |
572,516 |
|
|
$ |
571,072 |
|
|
19
ITEM 2. MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
The following discussion should be read in conjunction with the Consolidated Financial Statements
and related Notes of MoneyGram International, Inc. (MoneyGram, the Company, we, us and
our). This discussion contains forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties.
MoneyGrams actual results could differ materially from those anticipated due to various factors
discussed under Forward-Looking Statements and elsewhere in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.
Executive Management Changes In April 2010, the Company named Nigel Lee as Executive Vice
President of the Companys Europe, Middle East, Africa and Asia Pacific region. In July 2010, the
Company named James E. Shields as Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer.
Table 1 Results of Operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
% |
|
June 30, |
|
% |
(Amounts in thousands) |
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
Change |
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
Change |
|
|
(unaudited) |
|
(unaudited) |
|
|
|
|
|
(unaudited) |
|
(unaudited) |
|
|
|
|
Revenue: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fee and other revenue |
|
$ |
277,644 |
|
|
$ |
278,493 |
|
|
|
(0 |
)% |
|
$ |
558,510 |
|
|
$ |
546,637 |
|
|
|
2 |
% |
Investment revenue |
|
|
6,253 |
|
|
|
8,455 |
|
|
|
(26 |
)% |
|
|
11,891 |
|
|
|
20,146 |
|
|
|
(41 |
)% |
Net securities (losses) gains |
|
|
(277 |
) |
|
|
4,233 |
|
|
NM |
|
|
2,115 |
|
|
|
4,289 |
|
|
NM |
|
Total revenue |
|
|
283,620 |
|
|
|
291,181 |
|
|
|
(3 |
)% |
|
|
572,516 |
|
|
|
571,072 |
|
|
|
0 |
% |
|
Fee and other commissions
expense |
|
|
120,248 |
|
|
|
121,764 |
|
|
|
(1 |
)% |
|
|
242,658 |
|
|
|
240,308 |
|
|
|
1 |
% |
Investment commissions expense |
|
|
216 |
|
|
|
354 |
|
|
|
(39 |
)% |
|
|
420 |
|
|
|
753 |
|
|
|
(44 |
)% |
|
Total commissions expense |
|
|
120,464 |
|
|
|
122,118 |
|
|
|
(1 |
)% |
|
|
243,078 |
|
|
|
241,061 |
|
|
|
1 |
% |
|
Net revenue |
|
|
163,156 |
|
|
|
169,063 |
|
|
|
(3 |
)% |
|
|
329,438 |
|
|
|
330,011 |
|
|
|
(0 |
)% |
|
Expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Compensation and benefits |
|
|
55,225 |
|
|
|
47,639 |
|
|
|
16 |
% |
|
|
112,787 |
|
|
|
99,271 |
|
|
|
14 |
% |
Transaction and operations
support |
|
|
48,579 |
|
|
|
71,166 |
|
|
|
(32 |
)% |
|
|
96,165 |
|
|
|
115,650 |
|
|
|
(17 |
)% |
Occupancy, equipment and
supplies |
|
|
10,975 |
|
|
|
12,237 |
|
|
|
(10 |
)% |
|
|
22,144 |
|
|
|
23,263 |
|
|
|
(5 |
)% |
Interest expense |
|
|
27,440 |
|
|
|
26,649 |
|
|
|
3 |
% |
|
|
51,847 |
|
|
|
53,689 |
|
|
|
(3 |
)% |
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
11,876 |
|
|
|
14,962 |
|
|
|
(21 |
)% |
|
|
24,387 |
|
|
|
29,324 |
|
|
|
(17 |
)% |
|
Total expenses |
|
|
154,095 |
|
|
|
172,653 |
|
|
|
(11 |
)% |
|
|
307,330 |
|
|
|
321,197 |
|
|
|
(4 |
)% |
|
Income (loss) before income taxes |
|
|
9,061 |
|
|
|
(3,590 |
) |
|
|
352 |
% |
|
|
22,108 |
|
|
|
8,814 |
|
|
|
151 |
% |
Income tax expense (benefit) |
|
|
2,213 |
|
|
|
(273 |
) |
|
NM |
|
|
4,448 |
|
|
|
290 |
|
|
NM |
|
Net income (loss) |
|
$ |
6,848 |
|
|
$ |
(3,317 |
) |
|
|
306 |
% |
|
$ |
17,660 |
|
|
$ |
8,524 |
|
|
|
107 |
% |
|
NM = Not meaningful
Following is a summary of our operating results in the second quarter of 2010:
|
|
|
Total fee and other revenue decreased $0.8 million to $277.6 million in the second
quarter of 2010, reflecting lower average money transfer fees per transaction from the
introduction of a $50 price band in the United States and a lower euro exchange rate,
significantly offset by money transfer transaction volume growth of 7 percent and corridor mix. See
further discussion of fee and other revenue under Table 2 Fee and Other Revenue and
Commissions Expense. |
|
|
|
|
Investment revenue decreased $2.2 million, or 26 percent, in the second quarter of 2010
due to lower yields earned on our investment portfolio and a decline in average investable
balances. |
|
|
|
|
We recorded net securities losses of $0.3 million in the second quarter of 2010 from
other-than-temporary impairments on asset-backed securities. This is compared to $4.2
million of net securities gains in the second quarter of 2009 from a realized gain from the
call of a trading investment and a $2.0 million net unrealized gain from trading securities
and related put option partially offset by other-than-temporary impairments on asset-backed
securities. |
|
|
|
|
Total commissions expense decreased $1.7 million, or 1 percent, in the second quarter of
2010, primarily due to a decline in the euro exchange rate and lower signing bonus
amortization and average commission rates, partially offset by higher money
transfer volume. |
20
|
|
|
Interest expense increased 3 percent to $27.4 million in the second quarter of 2010 from
$26.6 million in 2009, reflecting a pro rata write-off of deferred debt financing costs and
debt discount in connection with the $60.0 million of debt prepayments in the second
quarter of 2010, significantly offset by lower outstanding debt balances. |
|
|
|
|
Total expenses decreased $18.6 million, or 11 percent, in the second quarter of 2010
compared to 2009. Expenses in 2009 include a $12.0 million accrual related to a settlement
with the Federal Trade Commission, a $9.0 million provision for loss from the closure of an
agent and a $3.8 million goodwill impairment charge. Depreciation and amortization expense
decreased $3.1 million, while stock-based compensation increased $4.2 million. Expenses in
2010 include a $1.5 million impairment charge related to the July 2010 sale of a corporate
aircraft and $1.9 million of costs associated with restructuring initiatives implemented in
the second quarter of 2010. |
|
|
|
|
In the second quarter of 2010, we had $2.2 million of income tax expense on pre-tax
income of $9.1 million, primarily reflecting the reversal of book-to-tax differences. |
|
|
|
|
The decline in the euro exchange rate (net of hedging activities) decreased total
revenue by $6.1 million, commissions expense by $2.5 million and operating expenses by $2.1
million, for a net decrease to our income before income taxes of $1.5 million. |
Table 2 Fee and Other Revenue and Commissions Expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
% |
|
June 30, |
|
% |
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
Change |
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
Change |
|
Fee and other revenue |
|
$ |
277,644 |
|
|
$ |
278,493 |
|
|
|
(0 |
)% |
|
$ |
558,510 |
|
|
$ |
546,637 |
|
|
|
2 |
% |
Fee and other commissions
expense |
|
|
120,248 |
|
|
|
121,764 |
|
|
|
(1 |
)% |
|
|
242,658 |
|
|
|
240,308 |
|
|
|
1 |
% |
Fee and other commissions
expense as a % of
fee and other revenue |
|
|
43.3 |
% |
|
|
43.7 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
43.4 |
% |
|
|
44.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
Fee and other revenue consists of fees on money transfer, bill payment, money order and official
check transactions. For the three months ended June 30, 2010, fee and other revenue decreased $0.8
million from 2009 due primarily to a $1.1 million decline in bill payment from lower average fee
per transaction due to industry mix, a $0.5 million decline in the Financial Paper Products segment
from lower volumes and $2.6 million of incremental fee and other revenue in 2009 related to
discontinued businesses and products, substantially offset by a net $3.4 million, or 2 percent,
increase in money transfer revenue. Money transfer volume growth of 7 percent drove $15.3 million
of incremental revenue, while changes in corridor mix generated $0.9 million of incremental
revenue. Lower average money transfer fees decreased fee and other revenue by $6.8 million from the
introduction of the $50 price band in the United States, while the lower euro exchange rate, net of
hedging activities, decreased fee and other revenue by $6.1 million. The $50 price band introduced
in late March and April allows consumers to send $50 of principal for a $5 fee at most locations,
or for $4.75 at a Walmart location. See Table 6 Global Funds Transfer Segment and Table 7
Financial Paper Products Segment for further information regarding fee and other revenue.
For the six months ended June 30, 2010, fee and other revenue increased $11.9 million, or 2
percent, from 2009 due primarily to a net $17.9 million increase in money transfer and a $2.7
million increase in the Financial Paper Products segment from our repricing initiatives, partially
offset by a $3.5 million decline in bill payment from lower average fee per transaction due to
industry mix and $5.3 million of incremental fee and other revenue in 2009 related to discontinued
businesses and products. Money transfer volume growth of 7 percent drove $27.8 million of
incremental revenue. Lower average money transfer fees decreased fee and other revenue by $6.8
million from the introduction of the $50 price band in the United States, while the lower euro
exchange rate, net of hedging activities, decreased fee and other revenue by $3.7 million. See
Table 6 Global Funds Transfer Segment and Table 7 Financial Paper Products Segment for further
information regarding fee and other revenue.
Fee and other commissions expense consists primarily of fees paid to our third-party agents for the
money transfer and bill payment services. Fee and other commissions expense for the three months
ended June 30, 2010 decreased $1.5 million, or 1 percent, compared to 2009 from the decline in the
lower euro exchange rate, lower signing bonus amortization and average commission rates,
significantly offset by $4.1 million of incremental fee commissions from money transfer transaction
volume growth. The lower euro exchange rate reduced fee commissions expense by $2.2 million. Agent
signing bonus amortization decreased $1.5 million as certain historical signing bonuses were fully
amortized or written off in the prior year. Lower average commission rates for money transfer
reduced fee commissions expense $0.9 million. In addition, other commissions expense for money
order products and other products
declined $0.8 million, while bill payment fee commissions were flat compared to the prior year.
Fee and other commissions expense for the six months ended June 30, 2010 increased $2.4 million, or
1 percent, compared to 2009 from $10.0 million of incremental fee commissions from money transfer
transaction volume growth, partially offset by lower signing bonus amortization and average
commissions rates and the decline in the euro exchange rate. Agent signing bonus amortization
decreased $2.7 million as certain historical signing bonuses were fully amortized or written off in
the prior year. Lower average commission rates for money transfer reduced fee commissions expense
by $2.0 million, while the lower euro exchange rate reduced fee commissions expense by $0.6
million. In addition, other commissions expense for money order products and other products
declined $1.9 million, while bill payment fee commissions decreased $0.8 million compared to the
prior year.
21
Table 3 Net Investment Revenue Analysis
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
% |
|
June 30, |
|
% |
(Amounts in thousands) |
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
Change |
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
Change |
|
Investment revenue |
|
$ |
6,253 |
|
|
$ |
8,455 |
|
|
|
(26 |
)% |
|
$ |
11,891 |
|
|
$ |
20,146 |
|
|
|
(41 |
)% |
Investment commissions expense |
|
|
(216 |
) |
|
|
(354 |
) |
|
|
39 |
% |
|
|
(420 |
) |
|
|
(753 |
) |
|
|
44 |
% |
|
Net investment revenue |
|
$ |
6,037 |
|
|
$ |
8,101 |
|
|
|
(25 |
)% |
|
$ |
11,471 |
|
|
$ |
19,393 |
|
|
|
(41 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average balances: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash equivalents and investments |
|
$ |
3,786,255 |
|
|
$ |
4,251,978 |
|
|
|
(11 |
)% |
|
$ |
3,854,371 |
|
|
$ |
4,322,589 |
|
|
|
(11 |
)% |
Payment service obligations (1) |
|
$ |
2,733,840 |
|
|
$ |
3,061,485 |
|
|
|
(11 |
)% |
|
$ |
2,759,624 |
|
|
$ |
3,089,243 |
|
|
|
(11 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average yields earned and rates paid
(2): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment yield |
|
|
0.66 |
% |
|
|
0.80 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.62 |
% |
|
|
0.94 |
% |
|
|
|
|
Investment commission rate |
|
|
0.03 |
% |
|
|
0.05 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.03 |
% |
|
|
0.05 |
% |
|
|
|
|
Net investment margin |
|
|
0.64 |
% |
|
|
0.76 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.60 |
% |
|
|
0.90 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Commissions are paid to financial institution customers based on amounts generated by the sale of official checks only. |
|
(2) |
|
Average yields/rates are calculated by dividing the applicable amount of Net investment revenue by the applicable
amount shown in the Average balances section, divided by the number of days in the period presented and multiplied
by the number of days in the year. The Net investment margin is calculated by dividing Net investment revenue by
the Cash equivalents and investments average balance, divided by the number of days in the period presented and
multiplied by the number of days in the year. |
Investment revenue consists of interest and dividends generated through the investment of cash
balances received from the sale of official checks, money orders and other payment instruments.
Investment revenue decreased $2.2 million, or 26 percent, and $8.3 million, or 41 percent, in the
three and six months ended June 30, 2010, respectively, compared to 2009 due to lower yields earned
on our investment portfolio and a decline in average investable balances from the run-off of
certain official check financial institution customers terminated in prior periods. For the three
and six months ended June 30, 2010, lower yields decreased revenue $1.2 million and $6.1 million,
respectively, while lower average investable balances decreased revenue $1.0 million and $2.2
million, respectively.
Investment commissions expense includes payments made to financial institution customers based on
amounts generated by the sale of official checks times short-term interest rate indices. Investment
commissions expense decreased $0.1 million, or 39 percent, and $0.3 million, or 44 percent, in the
three and six months ended June 30, 2010, respectively, compared to 2009 reflecting the lower
federal funds rate and lower average investable balances. Consistent with 2009, the federal funds
rate was so low during the six months ended June 30, 2010 that most of our financial institution
customers continue to be in a negative commission position, meaning we do not owe any commissions
to our customers. While the majority of our contracts require that the financial institution
customers pay us for the negative commission amounts, we have opted at this time to impose certain
per-item and other fees rather than require payment of the negative commission amount.
As a result of the factors discussed above, net investment revenue decreased $2.1 million, or 25
percent, and $7.9 million, or 41 percent, for the three and six months ended June 30, 2010,
respectively, while the net investment margin decreased 0.12 percentage points and 0.30 percentage points for the three
and six months ended June 30, 2010, respectively.
Table 4 Net Securities (Losses) Gains
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
June 30, |
|
June 30, |
(Amounts in thousands) |
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
Gross realized losses from available-for-sale investments |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(2 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(2 |
) |
Other-than-temporary impairments from available-for-sale
investments |
|
|
(277 |
) |
|
|
(848 |
) |
|
|
(334 |
) |
|
|
(2,929 |
) |
Net unrealized gains from trading investments and related put
options |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,145 |
|
Realized gains from trading investments and related put options |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,075 |
|
|
|
2,449 |
|
|
|
3,075 |
|
|
Net securities (losses) gains |
|
$ |
(277 |
) |
|
$ |
4,233 |
|
|
$ |
2,115 |
|
|
$ |
4,289 |
|
|
22
We recorded other-than-temporary impairments on our asset-backed securities of $0.3 million in the
three and six months ended June 30, 2010. The six months ended June 30, 2010 also reflects a $2.4
million realized gain from the call of a trading investment, net of the reversal of the related put
option. Net securities gains for the three and six months ended June 30, 2009 reflect a net
unrealized gain from trading investments and related put options of $2.0 million and $4.1 million,
respectively. In addition, the call of a trading investment resulted in a $3.1 million realized
gain in the three and six months ended June 30, 2009. Other-than-temporary impairments on our other
asset-backed securities were $0.8 million and $2.9 million for the three and six months ended June
30, 2009, respectively.
Expenses
The following discussion relates to operating expenses, excluding commissions expense, as presented
in Table 1 Results of Operations.
Compensation and benefits Compensation and benefits includes salaries and benefits, management
incentive programs and other employee related costs. For the three months ended June 30, 2010,
compensation and benefits increased $7.6 million, or 16 percent, from 2009, primarily due to higher
stock-based compensation expense, severance expense and costs associated with restructuring
initiatives implemented in the second quarter of 2010. Stock-based compensation expense increased
$4.2 million, net of forfeitures, during the three months ended June 30, 2010 primarily due to
grants awarded during 2010 and the second half of 2009. Restructuring initiatives implemented in
the second quarter of 2010 generated $1.6 million of severance expense during the three months
ended June 30, 2010. In addition, compensation and benefits increased by $2.2 million as 2009
included a benefit from the reversal of a severance accrual that the Company was no longer
obligated to pay. As reflected in each of the amounts discussed above, the decrease in the euro
exchange rate, net of hedging activities, decreased compensation and benefits expense by $0.9
million for the three months ended June 30, 2010.
For the six months ended June 30, 2010, compensation and benefits increased $13.5 million, or 14
percent, from 2009, primarily from higher stock-based and incentive compensation expense.
Stock-based compensation expense increased $10.9 million, net of forfeitures, during the six months
ended June 30, 2010 primarily due to grants awarded in 2010 and the second half of 2009. Incentive
compensation increased $2.2 million from the anticipated achievement of a higher performance level,
partially offset by lower sales incentives accruals. As reflected in each of the amounts discussed
above, the decrease in the euro exchange rate, net of hedging activities, decreased compensation
and benefits expense by $0.2 million for the six months ended June 30, 2010.
Transaction and operations support Transaction and operations support includes marketing,
professional fees and other outside service costs, telecommunications and agent forms related to
our products. Transaction and operations support for the three months ended June 30, 2010 decreased
$22.6 million, or 32 percent, from 2009. Expenses in 2009 included a $12.0 million accrual related
to a settlement with the Federal Trade Commission, a $9.0 million provision for loss from the
closure of an agent and a $3.8 million goodwill impairment charge. During the three months ended
June 30, 2010, the Company recognized a $1.5 million impairment charge related to the July 2010
sale of a corporate aircraft. In addition, the impact of foreign exchange rate movements on our
foreign denominated assets and liabilities, net of hedging activities, generated $1.1 million of
incremental expense in 2010, while agent location growth generated $0.7 million of incremental
marketing costs. Restructuring initiatives implemented in the second quarter of 2010 generated $0.3
million of relocation expense for the three months ended June 30, 2010. The timing of legal matters
decreased expenses in 2010 by $1.3 million. In addition, cost savings initiatives resulted in a
$0.9 million decrease in our telecommunication costs and agent forms and supplies. As reflected in
each of the amounts discussed above, the decrease in the euro exchange rate, net of hedging
activities, decreased transactions and operations support by $0.9 million for the three months
ended June 30, 2010.
Transaction and operations support for the six months ended June 30, 2010 decreased $19.5 million,
or 17 percent, from 2009, primarily reflecting the items discussed above. The impact of foreign
exchange rate movements on our foreign denominated assets and liabilities, net of hedging
activities, reduced expense by $0.3 million, while agent location growth generated $2.4 million of
incremental marketing costs. The timing of legal matters drove
incremental expense of $1.3 million,
while additional licensing fees, primarily in the United Kingdom, resulted in incremental expense
of $1.9 million. As reflected in each of the amounts discussed above, the decrease in the euro
exchange rate, net of hedging activities, decreased transactions and operations support by $0.4
million for the six months ended June 30, 2010.
Occupancy, equipment and supplies Occupancy, equipment and supplies includes facilities rent and
maintenance costs, software and equipment maintenance costs, freight and delivery costs and
supplies. Occupancy, equipment and supplies decreased $1.3 million, or 10 percent, and $1.1
million, or 5 percent, for the three and six months ended June 30, 2010, due to controlled spending
and the
timing of the roll-out of new agents and locations, partially offset by costs incurred to support
the growth of the business. As reflected in the amount discussed above, the decrease in the euro
exchange rate, net of hedging activities, decreased occupancy, equipment and supplies $0.2 million
for the three months ended June 30, 2010, with no impact to the six months ended June 30, 2010.
Interest expense Interest expense increased 3 percent to $27.4 million in the three months ended
June 30, 2010 from $26.6 million in the three months ended June 30, 2009, reflecting a pro rata
write-off of deferred debt financing costs and debt discount in connection with $60 million of debt
prepayments in the second quarter of 2010, significantly offset by lower outstanding debt balances.
For the six months ended June 30, 2010, interest expense decreased $1.8 million, or 3 percent, from
2009 due to lower outstanding debt balances, partially offset by the write-off of deferred
financing costs and debt discount discussed above.
23
Depreciation and amortization Depreciation and amortization includes depreciation on point of
sale equipment, agent signage, computer hardware and software, office furniture and equipment,
along with amortization of leasehold improvements, capitalized software development costs and
intangible assets. Depreciation and amortization decreased $3.1 million, or 21 percent, and $4.9
million, or 17 percent, for the three and six months ended June 30, 2010, respectively, from 2009,
primarily from lower depreciation expense on point of sale equipment, signs, computer hardware and
other equipment, as well as amortization of capitalized software. As reflected in the amount
discussed above, the decrease in the euro exchange rate, net of hedging activities, decreased
depreciation and amortization $0.2 million for the three months ended June 30, 2010, with no impact
to the six months ended June 30, 2010.
We are undergoing a system transformation to re-engineer select core business processes, which we
expect to implement in the third quarter of 2010. Future depreciation and amortization will
increase as a result of the investment in our infrastructure.
Income taxes For the three months ended June 30, 2010, the Company had $2.2 million of income tax
expense on pre-tax income of $9.1 million, resulting in an effective income tax rate of 24.4
percent. For the six months ended June 30, 2010, the Company had $4.4 million of income tax expense
on pre-tax income of $22.1 million, resulting in an effective income tax rate of 20.1 percent. The
effective income tax rate for the three and six months ended June 30, 2010, primarily reflects the
reversal of book-to-tax differences, including a litigation accrual.
For the three months ended June 30, 2009, the Company had $0.3 million of tax benefit on a pre-tax
loss of $3.6 million, resulting in an effective income tax rate of 7.6 percent. For the six months
ended June 30, 2009, the Company had $0.3 million of tax expense on pre-tax income of $8.8 million,
resulting in an effective income tax rate of 3.3 percent. The effective income tax rate for the
three and six months ended June 30, 2009 reflects benefits recognized on tax positions with respect
to part of the net securities losses from 2008 and 2007.
Acquisitions
Acquisition activity is set forth in Note 3 Acquisitions and Disposals of the Notes to the
Consolidated Financial Statements.
Segment Performance
We measure financial performance by our two reporting segments Global Funds Transfer and
Financial Paper Products. Our reporting segments are primarily organized based on the nature of
products and services offered and the type of consumer served. The Global Funds Transfer segment
provides global money transfers and bill payment services to consumers through a network of agents
and, in select markets, company-operated locations. The Financial Paper Products segment provides
money orders to consumers through our retail and financial institution locations in the United
States and Puerto Rico, and provides official check services to financial institutions in the
United States. Businesses that are not operated within these segments are categorized as Other,
and primarily relate to discontinued products and businesses. Segment pre-tax operating income and
segment operating margin are used to review operating performance and allocate resources.
We manage our investment portfolio on a consolidated level, with no specific investment security
assigned to a particular segment. However, investment revenue is allocated to each segment based on
the average investable balances generated by that segments sale of payment instruments during the
period. Net securities (losses) gains are not allocated to the segments as the investment portfolio
is managed at a consolidated level. Forward foreign exchange contracts are identified with the
money transfer product in the Global Funds Transfer segment.
Also excluded from operating income for Global Funds Transfer and Financial Paper Products are
interest and other expenses related to our credit agreements, items related to our preferred stock,
operating income from businesses categorized as Other, certain pension and benefit obligation
expenses, director deferred compensation plan expenses, executive severance and related costs,
certain legal and corporate costs not related to the performance of the segments and restructuring
and reorganization costs.
24
Table 5 Segment Information
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
(Amounts in thousands) |
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
Change |
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
Change |
|
|
|
Operating income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Global Funds Transfer |
|
$ |
30,882 |
|
|
$ |
7,545 |
|
|
$ |
23,337 |
|
|
$ |
58,663 |
|
|
$ |
44,437 |
|
|
$ |
14,226 |
|
Financial Paper Products |
|
|
11,573 |
|
|
|
10,126 |
|
|
|
1,447 |
|
|
|
20,477 |
|
|
|
17,406 |
|
|
|
3,071 |
|
Other |
|
|
(555 |
) |
|
|
(1,149 |
) |
|
|
594 |
|
|
|
(1,074 |
) |
|
|
(1,399 |
) |
|
|
325 |
|
|
Total segment operating
income |
|
|
41,900 |
|
|
|
16,522 |
|
|
|
25,378 |
|
|
|
78,066 |
|
|
|
60,444 |
|
|
|
17,622 |
|
Net securities (losses) gains |
|
|
(277 |
) |
|
|
4,233 |
|
|
|
(4,510 |
) |
|
|
2,115 |
|
|
|
4,289 |
|
|
|
(2,174 |
) |
Interest expense |
|
|
(27,440 |
) |
|
|
(26,649 |
) |
|
|
(791 |
) |
|
|
(51,847 |
) |
|
|
(53,689 |
) |
|
|
1,842 |
|
Other unallocated expenses |
|
|
(5,122 |
) |
|
|
2,304 |
|
|
|
(7,426 |
) |
|
|
(6,226 |
) |
|
|
(2,230 |
) |
|
|
(3,996 |
) |
|
Income (loss) before income taxes |
|
$ |
9,061 |
|
|
$ |
(3,590 |
) |
|
$ |
12,651 |
|
|
$ |
22,108 |
|
|
$ |
8,814 |
|
|
$ |
13,294 |
|
|
Table 6 Global Funds Transfer Segment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
% |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
% |
|
(Amounts in thousands) |
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
Change |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
Change |
|
|
Money transfer revenue: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fee and other revenue |
|
$ |
222,598 |
|
|
$ |
219,241 |
|
|
|
2 |
% |
|
$ |
445,330 |
|
|
$ |
427,419 |
|
|
|
4 |
% |
Investment revenue |
|
|
19 |
|
|
|
107 |
|
|
NM |
|
|
118 |
|
|
|
109 |
|
|
NM |
|
Total money transfer revenue |
|
|
222,617 |
|
|
|
219,348 |
|
|
|
1 |
% |
|
|
445,448 |
|
|
|
427,528 |
|
|
|
4 |
% |
|
Bill payment revenue: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fee and other revenue |
|
|
31,018 |
|
|
|
32,121 |
|
|
|
(3 |
)% |
|
|
64,857 |
|
|
|
68,364 |
|
|
|
(5 |
)% |
Investment revenue |
|
|
21 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
NM |
|
|
45 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
NM |
|
Total bill payment revenue |
|
|
31,039 |
|
|
|
32,124 |
|
|
|
(3 |
)% |
|
|
64,902 |
|
|
|
68,371 |
|
|
|
(5 |
)% |
|
Total Global Funds Transfer revenue: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fee and other revenue |
|
|
253,616 |
|
|
|
251,362 |
|
|
|
1 |
% |
|
|
510,187 |
|
|
|
495,783 |
|
|
|
3 |
% |
Investment revenue |
|
|
40 |
|
|
|
110 |
|
|
NM |
|
|
163 |
|
|
|
116 |
|
|
NM |
|
Total Global Funds Transfer
revenue |
|
|
253,656 |
|
|
|
251,472 |
|
|
|
1 |
% |
|
|
510,350 |
|
|
|
495,899 |
|
|
|
3 |
% |
|
Commissions expense |
|
|
119,138 |
|
|
|
119,834 |
|
|
|
(1 |
)% |
|
|
240,295 |
|
|
|
236,075 |
|
|
|
2 |
% |
|
Net revenue |
|
$ |
134,518 |
|
|
$ |
131,638 |
|
|
|
2 |
% |
|
$ |
270,055 |
|
|
$ |
259,824 |
|
|
|
4 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income |
|
$ |
30,882 |
|
|
$ |
7,545 |
|
|
|
309 |
% |
|
$ |
58,663 |
|
|
$ |
44,437 |
|
|
|
32 |
% |
Operating margin |
|
|
12.2 |
% |
|
|
3.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
11.5 |
% |
|
|
9.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
Total revenue in the Global Funds Transfer segment consists primarily of fees on money transfers
and bill payment transactions. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2010, total Global Funds
Transfer segment revenue increased $2.2 million, or 1 percent, and $14.5 million, or 3 percent,
respectively, driven by money transfer volume growth, partially offset by a decline in total bill
payment revenue. The following discussion reflects activity for the three and six months ended June
30, 2010 as compared to the same periods in 2009.
Money transfer fee and other revenue increased $3.4 million, or 2 percent, and $17.9 million, or 4
percent, for the three and six months ended June 30, 2010, respectively. Money transfer transaction
volume growth of 7 percent generated incremental revenue of $15.3 million and $27.8 million for the
three and six months ended June 30, 2010, respectively. Changes in corridor mix resulted in $0.9
million of incremental revenue from higher average fees for the three months ended June 30, 2010.
The introduction of a $50
price band in the United States resulted in a $6.8 million decrease in fee and other revenue for
both periods from lower average fees. The $50 price band introduced in late March and April 2010
allows consumers to send $50 within the United States for $5 at most locations, or for $4.75 at
Walmart locations.
25
We anticipate revenue growth to be lower than transaction growth through the
first quarter of 2011 due to lower average fees resulting from the $50 price band category. We
continue to evaluate the price-volume dynamic and will continue to make further changes in our
pricing as appropriate as we expect the competitive environment to remain high. The lower euro
exchange rate, net of hedging activities, decreased fee and other revenue by $6.1 million and $3.7 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2010, respectively.
Transactions and the related fee revenue are viewed as originating from the send side of a
transaction. Accordingly, discussion of transactions by geographic location refers to the region
originating a transaction. The following discussion reflects activity for the three and six months
ended June 30, 2010, compared to 2009. Money transfer transactions originating outside of the
United States increased 12 percent from the prior year for both periods. Excluding Spain,
transactions originating outside of the United States increased 16 percent from the prior year for
both periods. Transactions originating in the United States, excluding transactions sent to Mexico,
increased 7 percent and 6 percent for each period, respectively, due primarily to intra-United
States remittances. Transactions sent to Mexico declined 4 percent and 8 percent for each period,
respectively, reflecting the impact of the United States recession on our consumers. Mexico
represented approximately 9 percent of our total transactions for both periods in 2010, compared to
10 percent for both periods in 2009.
The money transfer agent base expanded 13 percent to approximately 203,000 locations in 2010,
primarily due to expansion in international markets. At June 30, 2010, the Americas (defined as the
United States, Canada, Mexico and Latin America (including the Caribbean)) had 68,000 locations,
with 39,500 locations in North America and 28,500 locations in Latin America (including 12,900
locations in Mexico). At June 30, 2010, EMEAAP (defined as Europe, Middle East, Africa and the Asia
Pacific region) had 135,000 locations, with 40,000 locations in Western Europe, 30,400 locations in
the Indian subcontinent, 28,300 locations in Eastern Europe, 22,200 locations in Asia Pacific,
10,500 locations in Africa and 3,600 locations in the Middle East.
Bill payment revenue for the three and six months ended June 30, 2010 decreased $1.1 million, or 3
percent, and $3.5 million, or 5 percent, respectively. A change in industry mix resulted in lower
average fees, for a $1.3 million and $3.5 million decrease in revenue for the three and six months
ended June 30, 2010, respectively. A slight increase in volume in the three months ended June 30,
2010 generated incremental revenue of $0.2 million.
Commissions expense in the Global Funds Transfer segment consists primarily of fees paid to our
third-party agents for money transfer and bill payment services, including the amortization of
capitalized agent signing bonuses. Commissions expense in the Global Funds Transfer segment
decreased $0.7 million, or 1 percent, for the three months ended June 30, 2010, and increased $4.2
million, or 2 percent, for the six months ended June 30, 2010. Money transfer volume growth
generated incremental fee commissions of $4.1 million and $10.0 million for the three and six
months ended June 30, 2010, respectively. The decline in the euro exchange rate reduced fee
commissions expense by $2.2 million and $0.6 million for the three and six months ended June 30,
2010, respectively. Agent signing bonus amortization decreased $1.2 million and $2.0 million for
the three and six months ended June 30, 2010, respectively, as certain historical signing bonuses
were fully amortized or written off in the prior year. Lower average money transfer commission
rates reduced fee commissions expense by $0.9 million and $2.0 million for the three and six months
ended June 30, 2010, respectively. While bill payment fee commissions were flat for the three
months ended June 30, 2010, they decreased $0.8 million for the six months ended June 30, 2010.
Operating margin in the Global Funds Transfer segment increased to 12.2 percent and
11.5 percent for the three and six months ended June 30, 2010, respectively, from 3.0
percent and 9.0 percent for the same periods in 2009. The lower margins in 2009 reflect a $12.0 million accrual related to a settlement with the Federal Trade Commission and a
$9.0 million provision for loss from the closure of an agent.
26
Table 7 Financial Paper Products Segment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
% |
|
June 30, |
|
% |
(Amounts in thousands) |
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
Change |
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
Change |
|
Money order revenue: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fee and other revenue |
|
$ |
16,501 |
|
|
$ |
18,763 |
|
|
|
(12 |
)% |
|
$ |
33,348 |
|
|
$ |
34,612 |
|
|
|
(4 |
)% |
Investment revenue |
|
|
1,165 |
|
|
|
1,385 |
|
|
|
(16 |
)% |
|
|
2,222 |
|
|
|
3,293 |
|
|
|
(33 |
)% |
|
Total money order revenue |
|
|
17,666 |
|
|
|
20,148 |
|
|
|
(12 |
)% |
|
|
35,570 |
|
|
|
37,905 |
|
|
|
(6 |
)% |
|
Official check revenue: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fee and other revenue |
|
|
6,871 |
|
|
|
5,095 |
|
|
|
35 |
% |
|
|
13,362 |
|
|
|
9,394 |
|
|
|
42 |
% |
Investment revenue |
|
|
4,616 |
|
|
|
6,161 |
|
|
|
(25 |
)% |
|
|
8,624 |
|
|
|
14,716 |
|
|
|
(41 |
)% |
|
Total official check revenue |
|
|
11,487 |
|
|
|
11,256 |
|
|
|
2 |
% |
|
|
21,986 |
|
|
|
24,110 |
|
|
|
(9 |
)% |
|
Total Financial Paper Products revenue: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fee and other revenue |
|
|
23,372 |
|
|
|
23,858 |
|
|
|
(2 |
)% |
|
|
46,710 |
|
|
|
44,006 |
|
|
|
6 |
% |
Investment revenue |
|
|
5,781 |
|
|
|
7,546 |
|
|
|
(23 |
)% |
|
|
10,846 |
|
|
|
18,009 |
|
|
|
(40 |
)% |
|
Total Financial Paper Products revenue |
|
|
29,153 |
|
|
|
31,404 |
|
|
|
(7 |
)% |
|
|
57,556 |
|
|
|
62,015 |
|
|
|
(7 |
)% |
|
Commissions expense |
|
|
1,032 |
|
|
|
1,840 |
|
|
|
(44 |
)% |
|
|
2,138 |
|
|
|
3,930 |
|
|
|
(46 |
)% |
|
Net revenue |
|
$ |
28,121 |
|
|
$ |
29,564 |
|
|
|
(5 |
)% |
|
$ |
55,418 |
|
|
$ |
58,085 |
|
|
|
(5 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income |
|
$ |
11,573 |
|
|
$ |
10,126 |
|
|
|
14 |
% |
|
$ |
20,477 |
|
|
$ |
17,406 |
|
|
|
18 |
% |
Operating margin |
|
|
39.7 |
% |
|
|
32.2 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
35.6 |
% |
|
|
28.1 |
% |
|
|
|
|
Revenue in the Financial Paper Products segment consists of per-item fees charged to our financial
institution customers and retail agents and investment revenue. For the three and six months ended
June 30, 2010, total Financial Paper Products segment revenue decreased $2.3 million, or 7 percent,
and $4.5 million, or 7 percent, respectively. Lower yields earned on our investment portfolio and a
decline in average investable balances from the run-off of certain official check financial
institution customers terminated in prior periods resulted in a $1.8 million and $7.2 million
decrease in allocated investment revenue for the three and six months ended June 30, 2010,
respectively. See Table 3 Net Investment Revenue Analysis for further information. Our repricing
initiatives in our official check business generated incremental revenue of $1.8 million and $4.0
million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2010, respectively, from the prior year.
During the three and six months ended June 30, 2010, money order fee and other revenue declined
$2.3 million and $1.3 million, respectively, as volumes declined 15 percent and 18 percent,
respectively. Money order volume declines are consistent with 2009 and are attributed to the
anticipated attrition of agents from repricing initiatives, consumer pricing increases as agents
pass along fee increases, the continued migration to other payment methods and the general economic
environment.
Commissions expense in the Financial Paper Products segment includes payments made to financial
institution customers based on amounts generated by the sale of official checks times short-term
interest rate indices, payments on money order transactions and amortization of capitalized signing
bonuses. Commissions expense decreased $0.8 million, or 44 percent, and $1.8 million, or 46
percent, for the three and six months ended June 30, 2010, respectively, as compared to 2009. See
Table 3 Net Investment Revenue Analysis for further discussion of investment commissions expense.
Lower agent rebates from our repricing initiatives and lower signing bonus amortization resulted in
a $0.7 million and $1.4 million decrease in money order commissions expense for the three and six
months ended June 30, 2010, respectively. Agent signing bonus amortization decreased $0.3 million
and $0.7 million in the three and six months ended June 30, 2010, respectively, as certain
historical signing bonuses were fully amortized or written off in the prior year.
The operating margin for the three and six months ended June 30, 2010 increased to 39.7 percent and
35.6 percent, respectively, from 32.2 percent and 28.1 percent, respectively, for the same periods
in 2009, reflecting lower commissions and operating expenses.
27
Liquidity and Capital Resources
We have various resources available to us for purposes of managing liquidity and capital needs,
including our investment portfolio, credit facilities and letters of credit. We refer to our cash
and cash equivalents, trading investments and related put options and available-for-sale
investments collectively as our investment portfolio. We utilize the assets in excess of payment
service obligations measure shown below in various liquidity and capital assessments. While assets
in excess of payment service obligations, as defined, is a capital measure, it also serves as the
foundation for various liquidity analyses.
Our primary sources of liquidity include cash flows generated by the sale of our payment
instruments, our cash and cash equivalent balances, credit capacity under our credit facilities and
proceeds from our investment portfolio. Our primary operating liquidity needs relate to the
settlement of payment service obligations to our agents and financial institution customers, as
well as general operating expenses.
Table 8 Assets in Excess of Payment Service Obligations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
December 31, |
(Amounts in thousands) |
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents (substantially restricted) |
|
$ |
3,492,147 |
|
|
$ |
3,776,824 |
|
Receivables, net (substantially restricted) |
|
|
1,047,768 |
|
|
|
1,054,381 |
|
Trading investments and related put options (substantially restricted) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
26,951 |
|
Available-for-sale investments (substantially restricted) |
|
|
216,894 |
|
|
|
298,633 |
|
|
|
|
|
4,756,809 |
|
|
|
5,156,789 |
|
Payment service obligations |
|
|
(4,472,692 |
) |
|
|
(4,843,454 |
) |
|
Assets in excess of payment service obligations |
|
$ |
284,117 |
|
|
$ |
313,335 |
|
|
Cash and Cash Equivalents To ensure we maintain adequate liquidity to meet our operating needs at
all times, we keep a significant portion of our investment portfolio in cash and cash equivalents
at financial institutions rated Aa3 or better by Moodys and AA- or better by S&P and in United
States government money market funds rated Aaa by Moodys and AAA by S&P. As of June 30, 2010, cash
and cash equivalents totaled $3.5 billion, representing 94 percent of our total investment
portfolio. Cash equivalents consist of money market funds that invest in United States government
and government agency securities, time deposits and certificates of deposit.
Credit Facilities Our credit facilities consist of a senior facility that includes senior notes
and a revolving credit facility and second lien notes. See Note 8 Debt of the Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements for further information. In the second quarter of 2010, we repaid
a total of $60.0 million on our senior facility. Combined with the debt repayments we made in 2009,
we have repaid $246.9 million of our outstanding debt since January 1, 2009, and continue to
evaluate further reductions of our outstanding debt ahead of scheduled maturities. Our revolving
credit facility has $235.0 million of borrowing capacity as of June 30, 2010, net of $15.0 million
of outstanding letters of credit.
Our credit facilities contain various financial and non-financial covenants. A violation of these
covenants could negatively impact our liquidity by restricting our ability to borrow under the
revolving credit facility and/or causing acceleration of amounts due under the credit facilities.
We are in compliance with all financial covenants as of June 30, 2010.
The terms of our credit facilities also place restrictions on certain types of payments we may
make, including dividends, acquisitions, and the funding of foreign subsidiaries, among others. We
do not anticipate these restrictions to limit our ability to grow the business either domestically
or internationally. In addition, we may only make dividend payments to common stockholders, subject
to an incremental build-up based on our consolidated net income in future periods. No dividends
were paid on our common stock in the three and six months ended June 30, 2010 and we do not
anticipate declaring any dividends on our common stock during 2010.
Credit Ratings As of June 30, 2010, our credit ratings from Moodys, Standard & Poors and Fitch
were B1, B+ and B+, respectively, with a stable outlook assigned by Moodys and Fitch and a
negative outlook assigned by Standard & Poors. Our credit facilities, regulatory capital
requirements and other obligations are not impacted by the level of our credit ratings. However,
higher credit ratings could increase our ability to attract capital, minimize our weighted average
cost of capital and obtain more favorable terms with our lenders, agents and clearing and cash
management banks.
Regulatory Capital Requirements We were in compliance with all financial regulatory requirements
as of June 30, 2010. We believe that our liquidity and capital resources will remain sufficient to
ensure on-going compliance with all financial regulatory requirements.
Investment Portfolio Our investment portfolio includes $216.9 million of available-for-sale
investments as of June 30, 2010. United States government agency residential mortgage-backed
securities and United States government agency debentures compose $196.1 million of our
available-for-sale investments, while other asset-backed securities compose the remaining
$20.8 million. In completing
our recapitalization in 2008, we contemplated that our other asset-backed securities might decline
further in value. Accordingly, the capital raised assumed a zero value for these securities. As a
result, further unrealized losses and impairments on these securities are already funded and would
not cause us to seek additional capital or financing.
28
Other Funding Sources and Requirements
Contractual Obligations The following table includes aggregated information about the Companys
contractual obligations that impact its liquidity and capital needs. The table includes information
about payments due under specified contractual obligations, aggregated by type of contractual
obligation.
Table 9 Contractual Obligations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payments due by period |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less than |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
More than |
(Amounts in thousands) |
|
Total |
|
1 year |
|
1-3 years |
|
4-5 years |
|
5 years |
|
Debt, including interest payments |
|
$ |
1,314,121 |
|
|
$ |
84,668 |
|
|
$ |
410,165 |
|
|
$ |
132,500 |
|
|
$ |
686,788 |
|
Operating leases |
|
|
43,538 |
|
|
|
12,139 |
|
|
|
22,846 |
|
|
|
8,154 |
|
|
|
399 |
|
Other obligations |
|
|
384 |
|
|
|
384 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total contractual cash
obligations |
|
$ |
1,358,043 |
|
|
$ |
97,191 |
|
|
$ |
433,011 |
|
|
$ |
140,654 |
|
|
$ |
687,187 |
|
|
Debt consists of amounts outstanding under our senior facility and the second lien notes at June
30, 2010, as disclosed in Note 8 Debt , as well as related interest payments, facility fees and
annual commitment fees. Included in our Consolidated Balance Sheet at June 30, 2010 is $740.6
million of debt, net of unamortized discounts of $5.7 million, and $0.3 million of accrued interest
on the debt. The above table reflects the principal and interest that will be paid through the
maturity of the debt using the rates in effect on June 30, 2010, and assuming no prepayments of
principal and the continued payment of interest on the second lien notes. In the second quarter of
2010, we repaid a total of $60.0 million on our senior facility. Operating leases consist of
various leases for buildings and equipment used in our business. Other obligations are unfunded
capital commitments related to our limited partnership interests included in Other asset-backed
securities in our investment portfolio. We have other commitments as described further below that
are not included in Table 9, as the timing and/or amount of payments are difficult to estimate.
The Companys Series B Stock has a cash dividend rate of 10 percent. At the Companys option,
dividends may be accrued through March 25, 2013 at a rate of 12.5 percent in lieu of paying a cash
dividend. Due to restrictions in our debt agreements, we elected to accrue the dividends and expect
that dividends will be accrued for at least the next 12 months. While no dividends have been
declared as of June 30, 2010, we have accrued dividends of $246.9 million in our Consolidated
Balance Sheets, as accumulated and unpaid dividends are included in the redemption price of the
Series B Stock regardless of whether dividends have been declared.
We have a funded, noncontributory pension plan that is frozen to both future benefit accruals and
new participants. Our funding policy has historically been to contribute the minimum contribution
required by applicable regulations. We were not required to, and did not make, a contribution to
the funded pension plan during 2009. We anticipate a minimum contribution of $3.0 million to the
pension plan trust in 2010. We also have certain unfunded pension and postretirement plans that
require benefit payments over extended periods of time. During the three and six months ended June
30, 2010, we paid benefits totaling $1.4 million and $2.9 million, respectively, related to these
unfunded plans. Benefit payments under these unfunded plans are expected to be $1.5 million for the
remainder of 2010. Expected contributions and benefit payments under these plans are not included
in the above table as it is difficult to estimate the timing and amount of benefit payments and
required contributions beyond the next 12 months.
As of June 30, 2010, the liability for unrecognized tax benefits was $12.3 million. As there is a
high degree of uncertainty regarding the timing of potential future cash outflows associated with
these liabilities, we are unable to make a reasonably reliable estimate of the amount and period in
which these liabilities might be paid.
In limited circumstances, we may grant minimum commission guarantees as an incentive to new or
renewing agents for a specified period of time at a contractually specified amount. Under the
guarantees, we will pay to the agent the difference between the contractually specified minimum
commission and the actual commissions earned by the agent. As of June 30, 2010, the minimum
commission guarantees had a maximum payment of $4.0 million over a weighted-average remaining term
of 1.7 years. The maximum payment is calculated as the contractually guaranteed minimum commission
times the remaining term of the contract and, therefore, assumes that the agent generates no money
transfer transactions during the remainder of its contract. As of June 30, 2010, the liability for
minimum commission guarantees was $1.8 million. Minimum commission guarantees are not reflected in
the table above.
29
Analysis of Cash Flows
Table 10 Cash Flows From Operating Activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
(Amounts in thousands) |
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
Net income (loss) |
|
$ |
6,848 |
|
|
$ |
(3,317 |
) |
|
$ |
17,660 |
|
|
$ |
8,524 |
|
Total adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) |
|
|
25,263 |
|
|
|
55,376 |
|
|
|
30,710 |
|
|
|
85,889 |
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities before
changes in payment service assets and obligations |
|
|
32,111 |
|
|
|
52,059 |
|
|
|
48,370 |
|
|
|
94,413 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in cash and cash equivalents (substantially restricted) |
|
|
186,352 |
|
|
|
(68,903 |
) |
|
|
284,677 |
|
|
|
103,696 |
|
Change in trading investments and related put
options, net (substantially restricted) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
17,900 |
|
|
|
29,400 |
|
|
|
17,900 |
|
Change in receivables, net (substantially restricted) |
|
|
(88,859 |
) |
|
|
7,265 |
|
|
|
95 |
|
|
|
151,290 |
|
Change in payment service obligations |
|
|
(100,154 |
) |
|
|
12,774 |
|
|
|
(370,826 |
) |
|
|
(358,058 |
) |
|
Net change in payment service assets and obligations |
|
|
(2,661 |
) |
|
|
(30,964 |
) |
|
|
(56,654 |
) |
|
|
(85,172 |
) |
|
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities |
|
$ |
29,450 |
|
|
$ |
21,095 |
|
|
$ |
(8,284 |
) |
|
$ |
9,241 |
|
|
Operating activities provided net cash of $29.5 million during the three months ended June 30,
2010. Cash generated from our operations was primarily used to pay $21.3 million of interest and
$60.0 million of principal on our debt, $1.4 million of signing bonuses, $9.2 million of capital
expenditures and normal operating expenditures. These expenditures were offset by proceeds of
$39.2 million from the maturity of available-for-sale investments, which was reinvested in cash
equivalents. Operating activities provided net cash of $21.1 million during the three months ended
June 30, 2009. Cash generated from our operations was primarily used to pay $24.0 million of
interest and $70.6 million of principal on our debt. These expenditures were offset by proceeds of
$58.7 million from the maturity of available-for-sale investments and $17.9 million from a trading
security that was called, all of which were reinvested in cash equivalents.
Operating activities used net cash of $8.3 million during the six months ended June 30, 2010. Cash
generated from our operations was primarily used to pay $43.0 million of interest and $60.0 million
of principal on our debt, $12.9 million of signing bonuses, $15.5 million of capital expenditures
and normal operating expenditures. These expenditures were offset by proceeds of $82.6 million from
the maturity of available-for-sale investments and $29.4 million from a trading security that was
called, all of which was reinvested in cash equivalents. Operating activities provided net cash of
$9.2 million during the six months ended June 30, 2009. Cash generated from our operations was
primarily used to pay $48.5 million of interest and $71.3 million of principal on our debt, $11.9
million in signing bonuses to agents and normal operating expenditures. These expenditures were
offset by proceeds of $81.5 million from the maturity of available-for-sale investments and $17.9
million from a trading security that was called, all of which was reinvested in cash and cash
equivalents. We received a $43.5 million federal income tax refund during the first quarter of
2009.
Table 11 Cash Flows From Investing Activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
June 30, |
|
June 30, |
(Amounts in thousands) |
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
Net investment activity |
|
$ |
39,249 |
|
|
$ |
58,678 |
|
|
$ |
82,572 |
|
|
$ |
81,538 |
|
Purchases of property and equipment |
|
|
(9,152 |
) |
|
|
(9,148 |
) |
|
|
(15,476 |
) |
|
|
(16,319 |
) |
Cash paid for acquisitions, net of cash acquired |
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(330 |
) |
|
|
(3,210 |
) |
|
Net cash provided by investing activities |
|
$ |
30,108 |
|
|
$ |
49,530 |
|
|
$ |
66,766 |
|
|
$ |
62,009 |
|
|
Investing activities provided cash of $30.1 million and $66.8 million during the three and six
months ended June 30, 2010, respectively, primarily from proceeds of $39.2 million and $82.6
million, respectively, from the maturity of available-for-sale investments, partially offset by
$9.2 million and $15.5 million, respectively, of capital expenditures. In February 2010, we paid
$0.3 million for the acquisition of Blue Dolphin. Investing activities provided cash of
$49.5 million and $62.0 million during the three and six months ended June 30, 2009, respectively,
primarily from proceeds from the normal maturity of available-for-sale investments of $58.7 million
and $81.5 million, respectively, partially offset by $9.1 million and $16.3 million, respectively,
of capital expenditures. We paid $3.2 million in February 2009 in connection with the acquisition
of Raphaels Bank.
30
Table 12 Cash Flows From Financing Activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
June 30, |
|
June 30, |
(Amounts in thousands) |
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
Proceeds from exercise of stock options |
|
$ |
442 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
1,518 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
Payments on debt |
|
|
(60,000 |
) |
|
|
(625 |
) |
|
|
(60,000 |
) |
|
|
(1,250 |
) |
Payments on revolving credit facility |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(70,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(70,000 |
) |
|
Net cash used in financing activities |
|
$ |
(59,558 |
) |
|
$ |
(70,625 |
) |
|
$ |
(58,482 |
) |
|
$ |
(71,250 |
) |
|
For the three and six months ended June 30, 2010, financing activities provided $0.4 million and
$1.5 million, respectively, of cash from the exercise of stock options, and used $60.0 million of
cash for the prepayments of Tranche B of our senior facility. For the three and six months ended
June 30, 2009, financing activities used cash of $70.6 million and $71.3 million, respectively, for
payments made on our senior facility.
Regulatory
One of our largest investors is The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. through various affiliates (Goldman
Sachs), which became a bank holding company and a financial holding company under the federal
Bank Holding Company Act of 1956 (the BHC Act) after investing in MoneyGram. We understand that
the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System or its delegees (the Federal Reserve) deems
the Company to be a controlled subsidiary of Goldman Sachs for purposes of the BHC Act as a result
of Goldman Sachs investment. Companies that are deemed to be subsidiaries of companies subject to
the BHC Act are subject to reporting to, and supervision and regular examination by, the Federal
Reserve.
Bank holding companies may engage in the business of banking, as well as activities that are so
closely related to banking, or managing or controlling banks, as to be a proper incident thereto.
A bank holding company that is, and all of whose depository institution subsidiaries are,
well-capitalized, well-managed and meet certain other conditions may elect to become a
financial holding company. Financial holding companies may engage, directly or indirectly, in
activities that are financial in nature or incidental to financial activities, or that are
complementary to a financial activity and do not pose a substantial risk to the safety or soundness
of depository institutions or the financial system generally. Goldman Sachs is a financial holding
company.
We believe our current businesses are permissible activities for subsidiaries of bank holding
companies and financial holding companies. We do not expect the limitations on the nonbank
activities of bank or financial holding companies to limit our current business activities. It is
possible, however, that these restrictions might limit our ability to enter other businesses that
we may wish to engage in in the future. In addition, the new Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and
Consumer Protection Act (the Dodd-Frank Act), the regulations required to be enacted to implement
that Act, and other laws or regulations that may be adopted in the future, could adversely affect
us and the scope of our activities, whether or not we are a subsidiary of a bank holding company or
a financial holding company. These new laws and regulations could also affect the way various of
our counterparties are generally required to do business with their customers, which may affect us.
We continue to discuss alternatives with Goldman Sachs and our respective advisers in an effort to
address being deemed a holding company subsidiary under the BHC Act. We believe that the ultimate
result will depend upon a number of factors, including the Federal Reserves consideration of the
requirements for us to be deemed no longer controlled by Goldman Sachs for BHC Act purposes,
market conditions, Goldman Sachs investment considerations, and the potential regulatory effects
of the BHC Act and the Dodd-Frank Act. These considerations may change from time to time, and we
can provide no assurance as to the timing or terms of any potential resolution of these control
issues under the BHC Act.
Critical Accounting Policies
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted
in the United States of America (GAAP) requires estimates and assumptions that affect the
reported amounts of assets and liabilities, revenues and expenses, and related disclosures in the
Consolidated Financial Statements. Actual results could differ from those estimates. On a regular
basis, management reviews the accounting policies, assumptions and estimates to ensure that our
financial statements are presented fairly and in accordance with GAAP.
Critical accounting policies are those policies that management believes are most important to the
portrayal of our financial position and results of operations, and that require management to make
estimates that are difficult, subjective or complex. There were no changes to our critical
accounting policies during the quarter ended June 30, 2010. For further information regarding our
critical accounting policies, refer to Part II, Item 7, Managements Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations Critical Accounting Policies in the Companys
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
See Note 16 Recent Accounting Pronouncements of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial
Statements for a description of recent accounting pronouncements.
31
Forward Looking Statements
This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q may contain forward-looking statements with respect to the
financial condition, results of operation, plans, objectives, future performance and business of
MoneyGram International, Inc. and its subsidiaries. Statements preceded by, followed by or that
include words such as may, will, expect, anticipate, continue, estimate, project,
believes or similar expressions are intended to identify some of the forward-looking statements
within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 and are included, along
with this statement, for purposes of complying with the safe harbor provisions of that Act. These
forward-looking statements involve risks and uncertainties. Actual results may differ materially
from those contemplated by the forward-looking statements due to, among others, the risks and
uncertainties described in Part I, Item 1A under the caption Risk Factors of our Annual Report on
Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009, as well as the various factors described below.
These forward-looking statements speak only as of the date on which such statements are made. We
undertake no obligation to update publicly or revise any forward-looking statements for any reason,
whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise, except as required by federal
securities law.
|
|
|
Substantial Debt Service and Dividend Obligations. Our substantial debt service and our
covenant requirements may adversely impact our ability to obtain additional financing and to
operate and grow our business and may make us more vulnerable to negative economic
conditions. |
|
|
|
|
Significant Dilution to Stockholders and Control of New Investors. The Series B Stock
issued to the investors at the closing of our recapitalization in 2008, dividends accrued on
the Series B Stock post-closing and potential special voting rights provided to the
Investors designees on the Companys Board of Directors significantly dilute the interests
of our existing stockholders and give the Investors control of the Company. |
|
|
|
|
Sustained Financial Market Disruptions. Disruption in global capital and credit markets
may adversely affect our liquidity, our
agents liquidity, our access to credit and capital, our agents access to credit and capital
and our earnings on our investment portfolio. |
|
|
|
Sustained Negative Economic Conditions. Negative economic conditions generally and in
geographic areas or industries that are important to our business may cause a decline in our
transaction volume, and we may be unable to timely and effectively reduce our operating
costs or take other actions in response to a significant decline in transaction volume. |
|
|
|
|
International Migration Patterns. A material slow down or complete disruption of
international migration patterns could adversely affect our money transfer volume and growth
rate. |
|
|
|
|
Retention of Global Funds Transfer Agents and Billers. We may be unable to maintain
retail agent or biller relationships or we may experience a reduction in transaction volume
from these relationships. |
|
|
|
|
Stockholder Litigation and Related Risks. Stockholder lawsuits and other litigation or
government investigations of the Company or its agents could result in material settlements,
fines, penalties or legal fees. |
|
|
|
|
Credit Risks. If we are unable to manage credit risks from our retail agents and
official check financial institution customers, which risks may increase during negative
economic conditions, our business could be harmed. |
|
|
|
|
Fraud Risks. If we are unable to manage fraud risks from consumers or certain agents,
which risks may increase during negative economic conditions, our business could be harmed. |
|
|
|
|
Maintenance of Banking Relationships. We may be unable to maintain existing or establish
new banking relationships, including the Companys domestic and international clearing bank
relationships, which could adversely affect our business, results of operation and our
financial condition. |
|
|
|
|
Interest Rate Fluctuations. Fluctuations in interest rates may negatively affect the net
investment margin of our Official Check and Money Order businesses. |
|
|
|
|
Repricing of our Official Check and Money Order Businesses. We may be unable to operate
our official check and money order businesses profitably as a result of our revised pricing
strategies. |
|
|
|
|
Failure to Maintain Sufficient Capital. We may be unable to maintain sufficient capital
to pursue our growth strategy, fund key strategic initiatives, and meet evolving regulatory
requirements. |
|
|
|
|
Failure to Attract and Retain Key Employees. We may be unable to attract and retain key
employees. |
|
|
|
|
Development of New and Enhanced Products and Related Investment. We may be unable to
successfully and timely implement new or enhanced technology and infrastructure, delivery
methods and product and service offerings and to invest in new products or services and
infrastructure. |
|
|
|
|
Intellectual Property. If we are unable to adequately protect our brand and other
intellectual property rights and avoid infringing on third-party intellectual property
rights, our business could be harmed. |
|
|
|
|
Competition. We may be unable to compete against our large competitors, niche
competitors or new competitors that may enter the markets in which we operate. |
|
|
|
|
United States and International Regulation. Failure by us or our agents to comply with
the laws and regulatory requirements in the United States and abroad, including the recently
enacted Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform Act and Consumer Protection Act and the regulations to
be developed thereunder, or changes in laws, regulations or other industry practices and
standards, could have an adverse effect on our results of operations, or change our
relationships with our customers, investors and other stakeholders. |
32
|
|
|
Operation in Politically Volatile Areas. Offering money transfer services through agents
in regions that are politically volatile or, in a limited number of cases, are subject to
certain Office of Foreign Assets Control restrictions could cause contravention of United
States law or regulations by us or our agents, subject us to fines and penalties and cause
us reputational harm. |
|
|
|
|
Network and Data Security. A significant security or privacy breach in our facilities,
networks or databases could harm our business. |
|
|
|
|
Systems Interruption. A breakdown, catastrophic event, security breach, improper
operation or other event impacting our
systems or processes or the systems or processes of our vendors, agents and financial
institution customers could result in financial loss, loss of customers, regulatory sanctions
and damage to our brand and reputation. |
|
|
|
|
Technology Scalability. We may be unable to scale our technology to match our business
and transactional growth. |
|
|
|
|
Company Retail Locations and Acquisitions. If we are unable to manage risks associated
with running Company-owned retail locations and acquiring businesses, our business could be
harmed. |
|
|
|
|
International Risks. Our business and results of operation may be adversely affected by
political, economic or other instability in countries that are important to our business. |
|
|
|
|
Tax Matters. An unfavorable outcome with respect to the audit of our tax returns or tax
positions, or a failure by us to establish adequate reserves for tax events, could adversely
affect our results of operations. |
|
|
|
|
Status as a Bank Holding Company Subsidiary. If we are deemed to be a subsidiary of a
bank holding company, our ability to engage in other businesses may be limited to those
permissible for a bank holding company. |
|
|
|
|
Internal Controls. Our inability to maintain compliance with the internal control
provisions of Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 could have a material adverse
effect on our business. |
|
|
|
|
Overhang of Convertible Preferred Stock to Float. Sales of a substantial number of
shares of our common stock or the perception that significant sales could occur, may depress
the trading price of our common stock. |
|
|
|
|
Anti-Takeover Provisions. Our capital structure, our charter documents or specific
provisions of Delaware law may have the effect of delaying, deterring or preventing a merger
or change of control of our Company. |
|
|
|
|
NYSE Delisting. We may be unable to continue to satisfy the criteria for listing on the
New York Stock Exchange. |
|
|
|
|
Other Factors. Additional risk factors as may be described in our other filings with the
SEC from time to time. |
Actual results may differ materially from historical and anticipated results. These forward-looking
statements speak only as of the date on which such statements are made, and we undertake no
obligation to update such statements to reflect events or circumstances arising after such date.
ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
There have been no material changes in our market risk since December 31, 2009. For further
information on market risk, refer to Part II, Item 7, Managements Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations Enterprise Risk Management in the Companys Annual
Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009.
ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
Disclosure Controls and Procedures As of the end of the period covered by this report (the
Evaluation Date), the Company carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the
participation of management, including the Companys Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of the Companys disclosure controls and
procedures, as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the
Exchange Act). Based upon that evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
Officer concluded that, as of the Evaluation Date, the Companys disclosure controls and procedures
were effective.
Disclosure controls and procedures are controls and procedures designed to ensure that information
required to be disclosed by the Company in its reports filed or submitted under the Exchange Act is
recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SECs rules
and forms and include controls and procedures designed to ensure that information that the Company
is required to disclose in such reports is accumulated and communicated to management, including
the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions
regarding required disclosures.
Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting There were no changes in the Companys
internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) of the Exchange Act) for
the quarter ended June 30, 2010 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to
materially affect, the Companys internal control over financial reporting.
Upcoming Changes in Systems The Company is undergoing a large system transformation which will
re-engineer select core business processes, particularly those related to our partner set-up,
settlement and servicing. This transformation will provide the Company with a platform to leverage
its infrastructure to enable and drive profitable and sustainable growth, increase operational
efficiency and automate controls and compliance. The transformation will benefit the money
transfer, bill payment and money order
products. The Company expects to implement this new system in the third quarter of 2010.
33
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
ITEM 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
The Company is involved in various claims, litigations and government inquiries that arise from
time to time in the ordinary course of our business. All of these matters are subject to
uncertainties and outcomes that are not predictable with certainty. The Company accrues for these
matters as any resulting losses become probable and can be reasonably estimated. Further, the
Company maintains insurance coverage for many claims and litigations alleged. Management does not
believe that after final disposition any of these matters is likely to have a material adverse
impact on the Companys financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.
Federal Securities Class Actions As previously disclosed, on March 9, 2010, the Company and
certain of its present and former officers and directors entered into a Settlement Agreement,
subject to final approval of the court, to settle a consolidated class action case in the United
States District Court for the District of Minnesota captioned In re MoneyGram International, Inc.
Securities Litigation. The settlement provides for a cash payment of $80.0 million, all but
$20.0 million of which would be paid by the Companys insurance carriers. At a hearing on June 18,
2010, the Court issued a final order and judgment approving the settlement. The settlement became
effective on July 26, 2010, when the time to appeal the Courts final order and judgment expired
without any appeal having been filed. The Company paid $20.0 million into an escrow account in
March 2010 and the insurance carrier paid $60.0 million in April 2010, resulting in full settlement
of the Companys liability in this matter.
Minnesota Stockholder Derivative Claims Certain of the Companys present and former officers and
directors are defendants in a consolidated stockholder derivative action in the United States
District Court for the District of Minnesota captioned In re MoneyGram International, Inc.
Derivative Litigation. The Consolidated Complaint in this action, which was filed on November 18,
2009 and arises out of the same matters at issue in the securities class action, alleges claims on
behalf of the Company for, among other things, breach of fiduciary duties, unjust enrichment, abuse
of control, and gross mismanagement. On February 24, 2010, the parties entered into a non-binding
Memorandum of Understanding pursuant to which they agreed, subject to final approval of the parties
and the court, to settle this action. On March 31, 2010, the parties entered into a Stipulation of
Settlement agreeing to settle the case on terms largely consistent with the Memorandum of
Understanding. On April 1, 2010, the Court issued an Order that preliminarily approved the
settlement, providing for notice to stockholders and scheduled a hearing on the settlement for June
18, 2010. The Stipulation of Settlement provides for changes to the Companys business, corporate
governance and internal controls, some of which have already been implemented in whole or in part.
The Company also agreed to pay attorney fees and expenses to the plaintiffs counsel in the amount
of $1.3 million, with $1.0 million to be paid by the Companys insurance carriers. On June 21,
2010, the Court denied an objection to the settlement filed by a MoneyGram shareholder, Russel L.
Berney, and issued a final order and judgment approving the settlement. On July 20, 2010, Mr.
Berney filed a notice of appeal of the final order and judgment in the United States Court of
Appeals for the Eighth Circuit.
ERISA Class Action On April 22, 2008, Delilah Morrison, on behalf of herself and all other
MoneyGram 401(k) Plan participants, brought an action in the United States District Court for the
District of Minnesota. The complaint alleges claims under the Employee Retirement Income Security
Act of 1974, as amended (ERISA), including claims that the defendants breached fiduciary duties
by failing to manage the plans investment in Company stock, and by continuing to offer Company
stock as an investment option when the stock was no longer a prudent investment. The complaint also
alleges that defendants failed to provide complete and accurate information regarding Company stock
sufficient to advise plan participants of the risks involved with investing in Company stock and
breached fiduciary duties by failing to avoid conflicts of interests and to properly monitor the
performance of plan fiduciaries and fiduciary appointees. Finally, the complaint alleges that to
the extent that the Company is not a fiduciary, it is liable for knowingly participating in the
fiduciary breaches as alleged. On August 7, 2008, plaintiff amended the complaint to add an
additional plaintiff, name additional defendants and additional allegations. For relief, the
complaint seeks damages based on what the most profitable alternatives to Company stock would have
yielded, unspecified equitable relief, costs and attorneys fees. On March 25, 2009, the Court
granted in part and denied in part defendants motion to dismiss. On April 30, 2010, plaintiffs
filed a motion for class certification, which defendants opposed in a brief filed May 28, 2010. On
June 8, 2010, defendants filed a motion for partial summary judgment. Both motions are scheduled
for hearing before the Court on October 22, 2010.
California Action On January 22, 2008, Russell L. Berney filed a complaint in Los Angeles
Superior Court against the Company and its officers and directors, Thomas H. Lee Partners, L.P.,
and PropertyBridge, Inc. and two of its officers, alleging false and negligent misrepresentation,
violations of California securities laws and unfair business practices with regard to disclosure of
the Companys investments. The complaint also alleges derivative claims against the Companys Board
of Directors relating to the Boards oversight of disclosure of the Companys investments and with
regard to the Companys negotiations with Thomas H. Lee Partners, L.P. and Euronet Worldwide, Inc.
The complaint seeks monetary damages, disgorgement, restitution or rescission of stock purchases,
rescission of agreements with third parties, constructive trust and declaratory and injunctive
relief, as well as attorneys fees and costs. In July 2008, an amended complaint was filed
asserting an additional claim for declaratory relief. In September 2009, an amended complaint was
filed alleging additional facts and naming additional defendants. The settlement in the Minnesota
Stockholder Derivative Litigation and the Minnesota District Courts April 1, 2010 Order
preliminarily approving the settlement in the Minnesota Stockholder Derivative Litigation contain
provisions enjoining MoneyGram stockholders from commencing or continuing to prosecute any
litigation involving the claims to be settled in that case. On April 5, 2010, the California court
stayed proceedings in this action pending the settlement hearing in the Minnesota Stockholder
Derivative Litigation. The final order and judgment issued in connection with the Minnesota
Stockholder Derivative Litigation on June 21, 2010 enjoined Mr. Berney from prosecuting the
derivative claims alleged in the California Action that were settled in the Minnesota Stockholder
Action.
34
ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS
Except as set forth below, there have been no changes in the risk factors set forth in the
Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009. For further information,
refer to Part I, Item IA, Risk Factors, in the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year
ended December 31, 2009.
The following risk factor replaces and supersedes, in its entirety, the risk factor regarding the
BHC Act in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009.
As a deemed subsidiary of a holding company regulated under the BHC Act, we are subject to
supervision, regulation and regular examination by the Federal Reserve.
The Federal Reserve supervises and regulates all bank holding companies and financial holding
companies, along with their subsidiaries. The new Dodd-Frank Act requires regular examinations of subsidiaries of bank and
financial holding companies and their subsidiaries in the same manner as if they were depository
institutions. As a subsidiary of a holding company regulated under the BHC Act, we are required to
provide information and reports for use by the Federal Reserve under the BHC Act. The Dodd-Frank
Act also increases the regulation and supervision of large bank and financial holding companies,
such as Goldman Sachs, and their subsidiaries, which may adversely affect us as a deemed subsidiary
of Goldman Sachs.
The following are new risk factors in addition to those disclosed in our Annual Report on Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2009.
Changes in laws and regulations could adversely affect us.
The Dodd-Frank Act, as well as the regulations required by that Act, and other laws or regulations
that may be adopted in the future, could adversely affect us and the scope of our activities, and
could adversely affect our operations, results of operations and financial condition, whether or
not we are a subsidiary of a bank holding company or a financial holding company.
The recent Dodd-Frank Act increases the regulation of financial services companies generally,
including non-bank financial companies supervised by the Federal Reserve.
The
Dodd-Frank Act increases the regulation and oversight of the financial services industry. The
Dodd-Frank Act addresses, among other things, systemic risk, capital adequacy, deposit insurance assessments,
consumer financial protection, interchange fees, derivatives, lending limits, thrift charters,
changes among the bank regulatory agencies, and the ability to conduct business with holding
company affiliates. Many of the provisions of the Dodd-Frank Act require studies and regulations.
The Dodd-Frank Act requires enforcement by various governmental agencies, including the new Bureau of Consumer
Protection (the Bureau). The new legislation and implementing regulations may increase our costs of
compliance, and may require changes in the way we conduct business. We cannot predict the effects
of this broad legislation or the regulations to be adopted pursuant
to the Dodd-Frank Act.
We expect to be subject to various provisions of the Consumer Financial Protection Act of 2010
adopted as part of the Dodd-Frank Act, which will result in a new regulator with new and expanded
compliance requirements, which is likely to increase our costs.
The Dodd-Frank Act establishes the Bureau, which will affect our business, even if we are not
deemed a subsidiary of a bank or financial holding company. Money transmitters such as the Company
will be required to provide additional consumer information and disclosures. The Bureau is charged
with studying and drafting standards to address existing prices and fees at locations where our
services are offered and adopt error resolution standards. The Bureau and the regulations it will
adopt are likely to necessitate operational changes and additional costs, but we cannot predict its
effects upon us or our business at this time.
ITEM 2. UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS
The Companys Board of Directors has authorized the repurchase of a total of 12,000,000 common
shares. The repurchase authorization is effective until such time as the Company has repurchased
12,000,000 common shares. Common stock tendered to the Company in connection with the exercise of
stock options or vesting of restricted stock are not considered repurchased shares under the terms
of the repurchase authorization. As of June 30, 2010, the Company has repurchased 6,795,000 common
shares under this authorization and has remaining authorization to repurchase up to 5,205,000
shares. The Company has not repurchased any shares since July 2007. However, the Company may
consider repurchasing shares from time-to-time, subject to limitations in its debt agreements.
ITEM 6. EXHIBITS
Exhibits are filed with this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q as listed in the accompanying Exhibit
Index.
35
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Company has duly caused
this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
|
|
|
|
|
|
MoneyGram International, Inc.
(Registrant)
|
|
August 9, 2010 |
By: |
/s/ JAMES E. SHIELDS
|
|
|
James E. Shields |
|
|
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer) |
|
|
36
EXHIBIT INDEX
|
|
|
Exhibit |
|
|
Number |
|
Description |
3.1
|
|
Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of MoneyGram International, Inc., as amended (Incorporated by
reference from Exhibit 3.1 to Registrants Annual Report on Form 10-K filed on March 15, 2010). |
|
|
|
3.2
|
|
Bylaws of MoneyGram International, Inc., as amended and restated September 10, 2009 (Incorporated by reference
from Exhibit 3.01 to Registrants Current Report on Form 8-K filed on September 16, 2009). |
|
|
|
3.3
|
|
Certificate of Designations, Preferences and Rights of Series A Junior Participating Preferred Stock of MoneyGram
International, Inc. (Incorporated by reference from Exhibit 4.3 to Registrants Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q
filed on August 13, 2004). |
|
|
|
3.4
|
|
Certificate of Designations, Preferences and Rights of the Series B Participating Convertible Preferred Stock of
MoneyGram International, Inc. (Incorporated by reference from Exhibit 4.2 to Registrants Current Report on Form
8-K filed on March 28, 2008). |
|
|
|
3.5
|
|
Certificate of Designations, Preferences and Rights of the Series B-1 Participating Convertible Preferred Stock of
MoneyGram International, Inc. (Incorporated by reference from Exhibit 4.3 to Registrants Current Report on Form
8-K filed on March 28, 2008). |
|
|
|
3.6
|
|
Certificate of Designations, Preferences and Rights of the Series D Participating Convertible Preferred Stock of
MoneyGram International, Inc. (Incorporated by reference from Exhibit 4.4 to Registrants Current Report on Form
8-K filed on March 28, 2008). |
|
|
|
10.1
|
|
MoneyGram International, Inc. Deferred Compensation Plan, as amended and restated April 12, 2010 (Incorporated by
reference from Exhibit 10.1 to Registrants Current Report on Form 8-K filed on April 14, 2010). |
|
|
|
10.2
|
|
2005 Deferred Compensation Plan for Directors of MoneyGram International, Inc., as amended and restated April 12,
2010 (Incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.2 to Registrants Current Report on Form 8-K filed on April 14,
2010). |
|
|
|
10.3
|
|
Deferred Compensation Plan for Directors of MoneyGram International, Inc., as amended and restated April 12, 2010
(Incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.3 to Registrants Current Report on Form 8-K filed on April 14, 2010). |
|
|
|
10.4
|
|
Compromise Agreement, dated April 21, 2010, between MoneyGram International Ltd. and John Hempsey (Incorporated by
reference from Exhibit 10.01 to Registrants Current Report on Form 8-K filed on April 26, 2010). |
|
|
|
10.5
|
|
MoneyGram International, Inc. 2005 Omnibus Incentive Plan, as amended (Incorporated by reference from Exhibit
10.01 to Registrants Current Report on Form 8-K filed on February 22, 2010). |
|
|
|
10.6
|
|
Letter Agreement, by and between the Company and Jean C. Benson, dated June 3, 2010 (Incorporated by reference
from Exhibit 10.01 to Registrants Current Report on Form 8-K filed on June 9, 2010). |
|
|
|
*10.7
|
|
Letter Agreement, by and between MoneyGram International, Inc. and James E. Shields, effective as of July 13, 2010. |
|
|
|
*10.8
|
|
Severance Agreement, by and between MoneyGram International, Inc. and James E. Shields, dated July 13, 2010. |
|
|
|
*10.9
|
|
Employee Trade Secret, Confidential Information and Post-Employment Restriction Agreement,
by and between MoneyGram International, Inc. and James E. Shields,
dated July 21, 2010. |
|
|
|
*10.10
|
|
Summary of Non-Employee Director
Compensation Arrangements, effective May 26, 2010. |
|
|
|
*10.11
|
|
Form of MoneyGram International, Inc. Restricted Stock Unit Award Agreement |
|
|
|
*31.1
|
|
Section 302 Certification of Chief Executive Officer. |
|
|
|
*31.2
|
|
Section 302 Certification of Chief Financial Officer. |
37
|
|
|
Exhibit |
|
|
Number |
|
Description |
*32.1
|
|
Section 906 Certification of Chief Executive Officer. |
|
|
|
*32.2
|
|
Section 906 Certification of Chief Financial Officer. |
38