6-K
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
Form 6-K
REPORT OF FOREIGN PRIVATE ISSUER PURSUANT TO RULE 13A-16 OR 15D-16
UNDER THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the Quarter Ended June 30, 2008
Commission File Number 1-15182
DR. REDDYS LABORATORIES LIMITED
(Translation of registrants name into English)
7-1-27, Ameerpet
Hyderabad, Andhra Pradesh 500 016, India
+91-40-23731946
(Address of principal executive office)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant files or will file annual reports under cover of Form
20-F or Form 40-F.
Form 20-F
þ Form 40-F
o
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is submitting the Form 6-K in paper as permitted by
Regulation S-T Rule 101(b)(1):
Note: Regulation S-T Rule 101(b)(1) only permits the submission in paper of a Form 6-K if
submitted solely to provide an attached annual report to security holders.
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is submitting the Form 6-K in paper as permitted by
Regulation S-T Rule 101(b)(7):
Note: Regulation S-T Rule 101(b)(7) only permits the submission in paper of a Form 6-K if
submitted to furnish a report or other document that the registrant foreign private issuer must
furnish and make public under the laws of the jurisdiction in which the registrant is
incorporated, domiciled or legally organized (the registrants home country), or under the rules
of the home country exchange on which the registrants securities are traded, as long as the
report or other document is not a press release, is not required to be and has not been
distributed to the registrants security holders, and, if discussing a material event, has already
been the subject of a Form 6-K submission or other Commission filing on EDGAR.
Indicate by check mark whether by furnishing the information contained in this Form, the
registrant is also thereby furnishing the information to the Commission pursuant to Rule 12g3-2(b)
under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
Yes o No þ
If Yes is marked, indicate below the file number assigned to registrant in connection with Rule
12g3-2(b): 82- .
QUARTERLY REPORT
Quarter Ended June 30, 2008
Currency of Presentation and Certain Defined Terms
In this Quarterly Report, references to $ or dollars or U.S.$ or U.S. dollars are to
the legal currency of the United States and references to Rs. or rupees or Indian rupees
are to the legal currency of India. Our financial statements are presented in Indian rupees and
are prepared in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards. Convenience
translation into U.S. dollars with respect to the unaudited condensed consolidated
interim financial statements is also presented. References to a particular fiscal year are to our
fiscal year ended March 31 of such year. References to ADS are to our American Depositary
Shares, to the FASB are to the Financial Accounting Standards Board, to SFAS are to the
Statements of Financial Accounting Standards, to SAB are to Staff Accounting Bulletin and to
the EITF are to the Emerging Issues Task Force. All references to IAS are to the
International Accounting Standards, to IASB are to the International Accounting Standards
Board, to IFRS are to International Financial Reporting Standards, to SIC are to Standing
Interpretations Committee and to IFRIC are to the International Financial Reporting
Interpretations Committee.
References to U.S. FDA are to the United States Food and Drug Administration, to NDAs
are to New Drug Applications, and to ANDAs are to Abbreviated New Drug Applications.
References to U.S. or United States are to the United States of America, its territories
and its possessions. References to India are to the Republic of India. All references to we,
us, our, DRL, Dr. Reddys or the Company shall mean Dr. Reddys Laboratories Limited
and its subsidiaries. Dr. Reddys is a registered trademark of Dr. Reddys Laboratories Limited
in India. Other trademarks or trade names used in this Quarterly Report are trademarks registered
in the name of Dr. Reddys Laboratories Limited or are pending before the respective trademark
registries.
Except as otherwise stated in this report, all translations from Indian rupees to U.S. dollars
are based on the noon buying rate in the City of New York on June 30, 2008 for cable transfers in
Indian rupees as certified for customs purposes by the Federal Reserve Bank of New York, which was
Rs.42.93 per U.S.$1.00. No representation is made that the Indian rupee amounts have been, could
have been or could be converted into U.S. dollars at such a rate or any other rate. Any
discrepancies in any table between totals and sums of the amounts listed are due to rounding.
Information contained in our website, www.drreddys.com, is not part of this Quarterly Report
and no portion of such information is incorporated herein.
Forward-Looking and Cautionary Statement
IN ADDITION TO HISTORICAL INFORMATION, THIS QUARTERLY REPORT CONTAINS CERTAIN FORWARD-LOOKING
STATEMENTS WITHIN THE MEANING OF SECTION 27A OF THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1933, AS AMENDED AND SECTION
21E OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934, AS AMENDED. THE FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS CONTAINED
HEREIN ARE SUBJECT TO CERTAIN RISKS AND UNCERTAINTIES THAT COULD CAUSE ACTUAL RESULTS TO DIFFER
MATERIALLY FROM THOSE REFLECTED IN THE FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS. FACTORS THAT MIGHT CAUSE SUCH A
DIFFERENCE INCLUDE, BUT ARE NOT LIMITED TO, THOSE DISCUSSED IN THE SECTION ENTITLED OPERATING AND
FINANCIAL REVIEW AND ELSEWHERE IN THIS REPORT. READERS ARE CAUTIONED NOT TO PLACE UNDUE RELIANCE
ON THESE FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS, WHICH REFLECT OUR ANALYSIS ONLY AS OF THE DATE HEREOF. IN
ADDITION, READERS SHOULD CAREFULLY REVIEW THE INFORMATION IN OUR PERIODIC REPORTS AND OTHER
DOCUMENTS FILED AND/OR FURNISHED WITH THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION (SEC) FROM TIME TO
TIME.
2
TABLE OF CONTENTS
|
|
|
|
|
ITEM 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS |
|
|
4 |
|
ITEM 2. OPERATING AND FINANCIAL REVIEW |
|
|
45 |
|
ITEM 3. LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES |
|
|
51 |
|
ITEM 4. RECENT DEVELOPMENTS |
|
|
53 |
|
ITEM 5. TREND INFORMATION |
|
|
54 |
|
ITEM 6. EXHIBITS |
|
|
56 |
|
SIGNATURES |
|
|
57 |
|
EX 99.1: INDEPENDENT AUDITORS REPORT ON REVIEW OF UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED
INTERIM
FINANCIAL INFORMATION |
|
|
|
|
3
ITEM 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
DR. REDDYS LABORATORIES LIMITED AND SUBSIDIARIES
UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED INTERIM BALANCE SHEETS
(in thousands, except share and per share data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
As of |
|
Particulars |
|
Note |
|
June 30, 2008 |
|
|
June 30, 2008 |
|
|
March 31, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
Convenience translation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
into U.S.$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property, plant and equipment |
|
9 |
|
U.S.$ |
449,480 |
|
|
Rs. |
19,296,169 |
|
|
Rs. |
16,765,432 |
|
Goodwill |
|
10 |
|
|
429,571 |
|
|
|
18,441,471 |
|
|
|
16,997,288 |
|
Other intangible assets |
|
11 |
|
|
444,794 |
|
|
|
19,094,986 |
|
|
|
16,755,508 |
|
Investment in equity accounted investees |
|
|
|
|
5,558 |
|
|
|
238,587 |
|
|
|
237,054 |
|
Other investments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,728 |
|
Other non-current assets |
|
|
|
|
3,244 |
|
|
|
139,246 |
|
|
|
80,153 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total non-current assets |
|
|
|
|
1,332,645 |
|
|
|
57,210,459 |
|
|
|
50,838,163 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inventories |
|
12 |
|
|
303,817 |
|
|
|
13,042,846 |
|
|
|
11,132,830 |
|
Trade receivables, net of allowances |
|
|
|
|
206,284 |
|
|
|
8,855,793 |
|
|
|
6,823,448 |
|
Other current assets |
|
|
|
|
114,011 |
|
|
|
4,894,471 |
|
|
|
3,858,155 |
|
Other investments |
|
|
|
|
76,125 |
|
|
|
3,268,062 |
|
|
|
4,753,580 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
13 |
|
|
86,744 |
|
|
|
3,723,929 |
|
|
|
7,421,441 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets |
|
|
|
|
786,981 |
|
|
|
33,785,101 |
|
|
|
33,989,454 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
|
|
U.S.$ |
2,119,626 |
|
|
Rs. |
90,995,560 |
|
|
Rs. |
84,827,617 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Share capital |
|
|
|
U.S.$ |
19,601 |
|
|
Rs. |
841,487 |
|
|
Rs. |
840,864 |
|
Share premium |
|
|
|
|
468,397 |
|
|
|
20,108,278 |
|
|
|
20,036,473 |
|
Unrealized gain/(loss) on investments |
|
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
633 |
|
|
|
(1,757 |
) |
Foreign currency translation reserve |
|
|
|
|
66,088 |
|
|
|
2,837,167 |
|
|
|
1,566,499 |
|
Share based payment reserve |
|
|
|
|
15,723 |
|
|
|
674,999 |
|
|
|
709,006 |
|
Hedging reserve |
|
|
|
|
(11,304 |
) |
|
|
(485,299 |
) |
|
|
(6,642 |
) |
Equity shares held by controlled trust |
|
|
|
|
(114 |
) |
|
|
(4,882 |
) |
|
|
(4,882 |
) |
Retained earnings |
|
|
|
|
589,857 |
|
|
|
25,322,546 |
|
|
|
24,211,253 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total equity |
|
|
|
U.S.$ |
1,148,263 |
|
|
Rs. |
49,294,929 |
|
|
Rs. |
47,350,814 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long term loans and borrowings, excluding current portion |
|
19 |
|
U.S.$ |
298,961 |
|
|
Rs. |
12,834,397 |
|
|
Rs. |
12,697,550 |
|
Provisions |
|
|
|
|
4,016 |
|
|
|
172,390 |
|
|
|
122,901 |
|
Other non-current liabilities |
|
|
|
|
10,007 |
|
|
|
429,598 |
|
|
|
323,378 |
|
Deferred tax liabilities |
|
|
|
|
116,256 |
|
|
|
4,990,879 |
|
|
|
4,856,381 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total non-current liabilities |
|
|
|
|
429,240 |
|
|
|
18,427,264 |
|
|
|
18,000,210 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bank overdraft |
|
13 |
|
|
20,867 |
|
|
|
895,802 |
|
|
|
434,928 |
|
Short term loans and borrowings |
|
19 |
|
|
67,099 |
|
|
|
2,880,570 |
|
|
|
4,427,781 |
|
Long term loans and borrowings, current portion |
|
19 |
|
|
52,194 |
|
|
|
2,240,699 |
|
|
|
1,791,004 |
|
Trade payables |
|
|
|
|
180,971 |
|
|
|
7,769,106 |
|
|
|
5,426,546 |
|
Provisions |
|
|
|
|
27,804 |
|
|
|
1,193,611 |
|
|
|
626,999 |
|
Other current liabilities |
|
|
|
|
193,188 |
|
|
|
8,293,579 |
|
|
|
6,769,335 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities |
|
|
|
|
542,124 |
|
|
|
23,273,367 |
|
|
|
19,476,593 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
|
|
U.S.$ |
971,363 |
|
|
Rs. |
41,700,631 |
|
|
Rs. |
37,476,803 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total equity and liabilities |
|
|
|
U.S.$ |
2,119,626 |
|
|
Rs. |
90,995,560 |
|
|
Rs. |
84,827,617 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The
accompanying notes form an integral part of these unaudited condensed consolidated interim financial
statements.
4
DR. REDDYS LABORATORIES LIMITED AND SUBSIDIARIES
UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED INTERIM INCOME STATEMENTS
(in thousands, except share and per share data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended |
|
Particulars |
|
Note |
|
|
June 30, 2008 |
|
|
June 30, 2008 * |
|
|
June 30, 2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Convenience |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
translation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
into U.S.$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues |
|
|
|
|
|
U.S.$ |
350,287 |
|
|
Rs. |
15,037,803 |
|
|
Rs. |
11,983,058 |
|
Cost of revenues |
|
|
|
|
|
|
175,715 |
|
|
|
7,543,466 |
|
|
|
5,914,180 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit |
|
|
|
|
|
U.S.$ |
174,571 |
|
|
Rs. |
7,494,337 |
|
|
Rs. |
6,068,878 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling, general and
administrative expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
118,457 |
|
|
|
5,085,351 |
|
|
|
3,581,305 |
|
Research and development expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
24,460 |
|
|
|
1,050,070 |
|
|
|
806,278 |
|
Other expense/(income), net |
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
5,616 |
|
|
|
241,104 |
|
|
|
(82,681 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses, net |
|
|
|
|
|
U.S.$ |
148,533 |
|
|
Rs. |
6,376,525 |
|
|
Rs. |
4,304,902 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Results from operating activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
26,038 |
|
|
|
1,117,812 |
|
|
|
1,763,976 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Finance income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,454 |
|
|
|
320,013 |
|
|
|
576,672 |
|
Finance expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5,660 |
) |
|
|
(242,983 |
) |
|
|
(418,263 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Finance income, net |
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
1,794 |
|
|
|
77,030 |
|
|
|
158,409 |
|
Share of profit/(loss) of equity
accounted investees, net of
income tax |
|
|
|
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
297 |
|
|
|
(4,028 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Profit before income tax |
|
|
|
|
|
|
27,839 |
|
|
|
1,195,139 |
|
|
|
1,918,357 |
|
Income tax expense |
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
(1,953 |
) |
|
|
(83,846 |
) |
|
|
(321,715 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Profit for the period |
|
|
|
|
|
U.S.$ |
25,886 |
|
|
Rs. |
1,111,293 |
|
|
Rs. |
1,596,642 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Attributable to: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity holders of the Company |
|
|
|
|
|
|
25,886 |
|
|
|
1,111,293 |
|
|
|
1,599,665 |
|
Minority interest |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,023 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Profit for the period |
|
|
|
|
|
U.S.$ |
25,886 |
|
|
Rs. |
1,111,293 |
|
|
Rs. |
1,596,642 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings per share |
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic earnings per share of
Rs.5/- each |
|
|
|
|
|
U.S.$ |
0.15 |
|
|
Rs. |
6.61 |
|
|
Rs. |
9.53 |
|
Diluted earnings per share of
Rs.5/- each |
|
|
|
|
|
U.S.$ |
0.15 |
|
|
Rs. |
6.58 |
|
|
Rs. |
9.48 |
|
The accompanying notes form an integral part of these unaudited condensed consolidated interim financial
statements.
5
DR. REDDYS LABORATORIES LIMITED AND SUBSIDIARIES
UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED INTERIM STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN EQUITY
(in thousands, except share and per share data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
gain/(loss) on other |
|
Foreign currency |
|
Share based |
Particulars |
|
Share capital |
|
Share premium |
|
investments |
|
translation reserve |
|
payment reserve |
|
|
Shares |
|
Amount |
|
Amount |
|
Amount |
|
Amount |
|
Amount |
Balance as of April 1, 2008 |
|
|
168,172,746 |
|
|
Rs. |
840,864 |
|
|
Rs. |
20,036,473 |
|
|
Rs. |
(1,757 |
) |
|
Rs. |
1,566,499 |
|
|
Rs. |
709,006 |
|
Issue of equity shares on exercise of
options |
|
|
124,637 |
|
|
|
623 |
|
|
|
71,805 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(68,029 |
) |
Share based payment expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
34,022 |
|
Profit for the period |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Changes in fair value of investments,
net of tax expense of Rs.2,474 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,390 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign exchange translation
adjustments, net of tax expense of
Rs.127,319 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,270,668 |
|
|
|
|
|
Effective portion of changes in fair
value of cash flow hedges, net of tax
benefit of Rs.246,471 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of June 30, 2008 |
|
|
168,297,383 |
|
|
Rs. |
841,487 |
|
|
Rs. |
20,108,278 |
|
|
Rs. |
633 |
|
|
Rs. |
2,837,167 |
|
|
Rs. |
674,999 |
|
|
|
|
Convenience
translation into U.S. $ |
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. $ |
19,601 |
|
|
U.S. $ |
468,397 |
|
|
U.S. $ |
15 |
|
|
U.S. $ |
66,088 |
|
|
U.S. $ |
15,723 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of April 1, 2007 |
|
|
167,912,180 |
|
|
Rs. |
839,561 |
|
|
Rs. |
19,908,837 |
|
|
Rs. |
(125,182 |
) |
|
Rs. |
342,858 |
|
|
Rs. |
564,937 |
|
Issue of equity share on exercise of
options |
|
|
137,672 |
|
|
|
688 |
|
|
|
70,246 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(65,835 |
) |
Share based payment expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
44,074 |
|
Profit for the period |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Changes in fair value of investments,
net of tax expense of Rs.9,122 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
40,175 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign exchange translation adjustments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(416,858 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Minority interest |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of June 30, 2007 |
|
|
168,049,852 |
|
|
Rs. |
840,249 |
|
|
Rs. |
19,979,083 |
|
|
Rs. |
(85,007 |
) |
|
Rs. |
(74,000 |
) |
|
Rs. |
543,176 |
|
|
|
|
[Continued
on next page]
6
[Continued
from table on page 6, first column(s) repeated]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity shares held |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
by a controlled |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Particulars |
|
Hedging reserve |
|
trust* |
|
Retained earnings |
|
Minority interest |
|
Total equity |
|
|
Amount |
|
Amount |
|
Amount |
|
Amount |
|
Amount |
Balance as of April 1, 2008 |
|
Rs. |
(6,642 |
) |
|
Rs. |
(4,882 |
) |
|
Rs. |
24,211,253 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rs. |
47,350,814 |
|
Issue of equity shares on exercise of options |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,399 |
|
Share based payment expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
34,022 |
|
Profit for the period |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,111,293 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,111,293 |
|
Changes in fair value of investments, net of
tax expense of Rs.2,474 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,390 |
|
Foreign exchange translation adjustments,
net of tax expense of Rs.127,319 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,270,668 |
|
Effective portion of changes in fair value
of cash flow hedges, net of tax benefit of
Rs.246,471 |
|
|
(478,657 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(478,657 |
) |
|
|
|
Balance as of June 30, 2008 |
|
Rs. |
(485,299 |
) |
|
Rs. |
(4,882 |
) |
|
Rs. |
25,322,546 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rs. |
49,294,929 |
|
|
|
|
Convenience translation into U.S. $ |
|
U.S. $ |
(11,304 |
) |
|
U.S. $ |
(114 |
) |
|
U.S. $ |
589,857 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. $ |
1,148,263 |
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of April 1, 2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
Rs. |
(4,882 |
) |
|
Rs. |
21,101,794 |
|
|
Rs. |
10,473 |
|
|
Rs. |
42,638,396 |
|
Issue of equity share on exercise of options |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,099 |
|
Share based payment expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
44,074 |
|
Profit for the period |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,599,665 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,599,665 |
|
Changes in fair value of investments, net of
tax expense of Rs.9,122 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
40,175 |
|
Foreign exchange translation adjustments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(416,858 |
) |
Minority interest |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,023 |
) |
|
|
(3,023 |
) |
|
|
|
Balance as of June 30, 2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
Rs. |
(4,882 |
) |
|
Rs. |
22,701,459 |
|
|
Rs. |
7,450 |
|
|
Rs. |
43,907,528 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
|
The number of equity shares held by a controlled trust as of April 1, 2007, June 30, 2007,
April 1, 2008 and June 30, 2008 was 82,800. |
The
accompanying notes form an integral part of these unaudited condensed consolidated interim financial statements.
7
DR. REDDYS LABORATORIES LIMITED AND SUBSIDIARIES
UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED INTERIM CASH FLOW STATEMENTS
(in thousands, except share and per share data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the three months ended June 30, |
Particulars |
|
2008 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
Convenience |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
translation into U.S.$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Profit for the period |
|
U.S.$ |
25,886 |
|
|
Rs. |
1,111,293 |
|
|
Rs. |
1,596,642 |
|
Adjustments for: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income tax expense |
|
|
1,953 |
|
|
|
83,846 |
|
|
|
321,715 |
|
Profit on sale of investments |
|
|
(1,742 |
) |
|
|
(74,796 |
) |
|
|
(15,951 |
) |
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
21,730 |
|
|
|
932,889 |
|
|
|
739,792 |
|
Allowance for doubtful trade receivable |
|
|
838 |
|
|
|
35,987 |
|
|
|
20,306 |
|
Inventory write-downs |
|
|
865 |
|
|
|
37,120 |
|
|
|
97,610 |
|
(Profit)/loss on sale of property, plant and equipment, net |
|
|
(66 |
) |
|
|
(2,847 |
) |
|
|
807 |
|
Equity in (gain)/loss of equity accounted investees |
|
|
(7 |
) |
|
|
(297 |
) |
|
|
4,028 |
|
Unrealized exchange (gain)/loss, net |
|
|
(6,719 |
) |
|
|
(288,446 |
) |
|
|
11,133 |
|
Interest expense, net |
|
|
4,043 |
|
|
|
173,558 |
|
|
|
156,906 |
|
Share based payment expense |
|
|
792 |
|
|
|
34,022 |
|
|
|
44,074 |
|
Negative goodwill on acquisition of business |
|
|
(3,503 |
) |
|
|
(150,403 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Changes in operating assets and liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trade receivables |
|
|
(38,527 |
) |
|
|
(1,653,958 |
) |
|
|
121,525 |
|
Inventories |
|
|
(25,044 |
) |
|
|
(1,075,149 |
) |
|
|
(1,194,813 |
) |
Other assets |
|
|
868 |
|
|
|
37,251 |
|
|
|
(1,352,952 |
) |
Trade payables |
|
|
40,808 |
|
|
|
1,751,906 |
|
|
|
1,015,114 |
|
Other liabilities and provisions |
|
|
3,719 |
|
|
|
159,677 |
|
|
|
1,124,353 |
|
Income tax paid |
|
|
(4,475 |
) |
|
|
(192,098 |
) |
|
|
(415,554 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash from operating activities |
|
U.S.$ |
21,420 |
|
|
Rs. |
919,555 |
|
|
Rs. |
2,274,735 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows used in investing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expenditures on property, plant and equipment |
|
|
(30,286 |
) |
|
|
(1,300,174 |
) |
|
|
(975,791 |
) |
Proceeds from sale of property, plant and equipment |
|
|
179 |
|
|
|
7,697 |
|
|
|
3,768 |
|
Purchase of investments |
|
|
(136,665 |
) |
|
|
(5,867,019 |
) |
|
|
(198,054 |
) |
Proceeds from sale of investments |
|
|
173,187 |
|
|
|
7,434,925 |
|
|
|
210,591 |
|
Expenditures on intangible assets |
|
|
(2,362 |
) |
|
|
(101,420 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Payment of contingent consideration |
|
|
(605 |
) |
|
|
(25,964 |
) |
|
|
(48,671 |
) |
Cash paid for acquisition of business |
|
|
(71,956 |
) |
|
|
(3,089,062 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Interest received |
|
|
1,295 |
|
|
|
55,610 |
|
|
|
263,591 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities |
|
U.S.$ |
(67,212 |
) |
|
Rs. |
(2,885,407 |
) |
|
Rs. |
(744,566 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows used in financing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest paid |
|
|
(5,536 |
) |
|
|
(237,655 |
) |
|
|
(363,254 |
) |
Proceeds from issuance of equity shares |
|
|
102 |
|
|
|
4,399 |
|
|
|
5,099 |
|
Repayment of short term loans and borrowings, net |
|
|
(39,071 |
) |
|
|
(1,677,334 |
) |
|
|
(1,651,318 |
) |
Repayment of long term loans and borrowings, net |
|
|
(11,134 |
) |
|
|
(477,984 |
) |
|
|
(6,248,407 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in financing activities |
|
U.S.$ |
(55,639 |
) |
|
Rs. |
(2,388,574 |
) |
|
Rs. |
(8,257,880 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
(101,431 |
) |
|
|
(4,354,426 |
) |
|
|
(6,727,711 |
) |
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
4,567 |
|
|
|
196,040 |
|
|
|
(221,443 |
) |
Cash and cash equivalents at the beginning of the period |
|
|
162,742 |
|
|
|
6,986,513 |
|
|
|
18,061,576 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at the end of the period |
|
U.S.$ |
65,878 |
|
|
Rs. |
2,828,127 |
|
|
Rs. |
11,112,422 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes form an integral part of these unaudited condensed consolidated
interim financial statements.
8
DR. REDDYS LABORATORIES LIMITED AND SUBSIDIARIES
UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED INTERIM FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(in thousands, except share and per share data)
1. |
|
Reporting Entity |
|
|
|
Dr. Reddys Laboratories Limited (DRL or the parent company), together with its subsidiaries
(collectively, the Company), is a leading India-based pharmaceutical company headquartered in
Hyderabad, India. The Companys principal areas of operation are in pharmaceutical services and
active ingredients, global generics, and proprietary products. The Companys principal research
and development facilities are located in Andhra Pradesh, India and in the United States; its
principal manufacturing facilities are located in Andhra Pradesh, India, Himachal Pradesh, India
and Cuernavaca-Cuautla, Mexico; and its principal marketing facilities are located in India,
Russia, the United States, the United Kingdom, Brazil and Germany. The Companys shares trade on
the Bombay Stock Exchange and the National Stock Exchange in India and, since April 11, 2001,
also on the New York Stock Exchange in the United States.
These unaudited condensed consolidated interim financial statements were authorized for issuance by the Companys Board of Directors on March 4, 2009. |
|
2. |
|
Basis of preparation of financial statements |
|
a. |
|
Statement of compliance |
|
|
|
These condensed consolidated interim financial statements as at and for the three months ended
June 30, 2008 have been prepared in accordance with IFRS and its interpretations issued by IASB.
These are the Companys first IFRS condensed consolidated interim financial statements forming
part of the period covered by the first IFRS annual financial statements for the year ending
March 31, 2009 and IFRS 1, First-time adoption of International Financial Reporting Standards,
has been applied. These condensed consolidated interim financial statements do not include all
the information required for full annual consolidated financial statements and are prepared in
accordance with IAS 34, Interim Financial Reporting. |
|
|
|
An explanation of how the transition to IFRS has affected the reported financial position and
financial performance of the Company is provided in Note 4. This Note includes reconciliations
of equity and profit or loss for comparative periods under U.S. GAAP (sometimes referred to
herein as Previous GAAP) to those reported for those periods under IFRS. |
|
b. |
|
Basis of preparation |
|
|
|
These condensed consolidated interim financial statements have been prepared on the basis of
relevant IFRS that are effective or available for early adoption at the Companys first IFRS
annual reporting date, March 31, 2009. Based on these IFRS, the Board of Directors has made
assumptions about the accounting policies expected to be adopted (accounting policies) when
the first IFRS annual financial statements are prepared for the year-ending March 31, 2009. |
|
|
|
The IFRS that will be effective or available for voluntary early adoption in the annual
financial statements for the period ending March 31, 2009 are still subject to change and to the
issue of additional interpretation(s) and therefore cannot be determined with certainty.
Accordingly, the accounting policies for such annual period that are relevant to this interim
financial information will be determined only when the first IFRS financial statements are
prepared at March 31, 2009. |
|
|
|
The preparation of the condensed consolidated interim financial statements in accordance with
IAS 34 resulted in changes to the accounting policies as compared with the most recent annual
financial statements prepared under Previous GAAP. The accounting policies set out below have
been applied consistently to all periods presented in these condensed consolidated interim
financial statements. They also have been applied in preparing an opening IFRS balance sheet at
April 1, 2007 for the purposes of the transition to IFRS, as required by IFRS 1. The impact of
the transition from Previous GAAP to IFRS is explained in Note 4. |
|
c. |
|
Basis of measurement/accounting convention |
|
|
|
These condensed consolidated interim financial statements have been prepared on the historical
cost basis and on an accrual basis, except for the following: |
|
|
|
derivative financial instruments are measured at fair value;
and |
|
|
|
|
available-for-sale financial assets are measured at fair value. |
9
DR. REDDYS LABORATORIES LIMITED AND SUBSIDIARIES
UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED INTERIM FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(in thousands, except share and per share data)
2. |
|
Basis of preparation of financial statements (continued) |
|
d. |
|
Functional and presentation currency |
|
|
|
The condensed consolidated interim financial statements are presented in Indian rupees, which is
the functional currency of DRL. Functional currency of an entity is the currency of the primary
economic environment in which the entity operates. |
|
|
|
In respect of all non-Indian subsidiaries that operate as marketing arms of the parent company
in their respective countries/regions, the functional currency has been determined to be the
functional currency of the parent company (i.e., the Indian rupee). Accordingly, the operations
of these entities are largely restricted to import of finished goods from the parent company in
India, sale of these products in the foreign country and remittance of the sale proceeds to the
parent company. The cash flows realized from sale of goods are readily available for remittance
to the parent company and cash is remitted to the parent company on a regular basis. The costs
incurred by these entities are primarily the cost of goods imported from the parent company. The
financing of these subsidiaries is done directly or indirectly by the parent company. |
|
|
|
In respect of subsidiaries whose operations are self contained and integrated within their
respective countries/regions, the functional currency has been determined to be the local
currency of those countries/regions. The assets and liabilities of such subsidiaries are
translated into Indian rupees at the rate of exchange prevailing as at the reporting date.
Revenues and expenses are translated into Indian rupees at average exchange rates prevailing
during the year. Resulting translation adjustments are included in foreign currency translation
reserve. |
|
|
|
All financial information presented in Indian Rupees has been rounded to the nearest thousand. |
|
e. |
|
Convenience translation |
|
|
|
The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated interim financial statements have been
prepared in Indian rupees. Solely for the convenience of the reader, the unaudited condensed
consolidated interim financial statements as of June 30, 2008 have been translated into United
States dollars at the noon buying rate in New York City on June 30, 2008 for cable transfers in
Indian rupees, as certified for customs purposes by the Federal Reserve Bank of New York of
U.S.$1.00 = Rs.42.93. No representation is made that the Indian rupee amounts have been, could
have been or could be converted into U.S. dollars at such a rate or any other rate. |
|
f. |
|
Use of estimates and judgments |
|
|
|
The preparation of condensed consolidated interim financial statements in conformity with IFRS
requires management to make judgments, estimates and assumptions that affect the application of
accounting policies and the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, income and expenses. Actual
results may differ from these estimates. |
|
|
|
Estimates and underlying assumptions are reviewed on an ongoing basis. Revisions to accounting
estimates are recognized in the period in which the estimates are revised and in any future
periods affected. In particular, information about significant areas of estimation uncertainty
and critical judgments in applying accounting policies that have the most significant effect on
the amounts recognized in the financial statements is included in the following Notes: |
|
|
|
Note 3(b) Assessment of functional currency for foreign operations |
|
|
|
|
Note 3(c) and 7 Financial instruments |
|
|
|
|
Note 3(h) Measurement of recoverable amounts of cash-generating units |
|
|
|
|
Note 3(j) Provisions |
|
|
|
|
Note 3(k) Sales returns, rebates and charge back provisions |
|
|
|
|
Note 3(m) Determination of annual effective tax rate in interim periods and
recoverability of deferred tax assets |
|
|
|
|
Note 6 Business combinations |
|
|
|
|
Note 21 Contingencies |
3. |
|
Significant accounting policies |
|
a. |
|
Basis of consolidation |
Subsidiaries
Subsidiaries are entities controlled by the Company. Control exists when the Company has the
power to govern the financial and operating policies of an entity so as to obtain benefits
from its activities. In assessing control, potential voting rights that currently are
exercisable are taken into account. The financial statements of subsidiaries are included in
the condensed consolidated interim financial statements from the date that control commences
until the
10
DR. REDDYS LABORATORIES LIMITED AND SUBSIDIARIES
UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED INTERIM FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(in thousands, except share and per share data)
3. |
|
Significant accounting policies (continued) |
|
a. |
|
Basis of consolidation (continued) |
date that control ceases. The accounting policies of subsidiaries have been changed when
necessary to align them with the policies adopted by the Company.
Special purpose entities
The Company has established certain special purpose entities (SPEs) for business purposes.
The Company does not have any direct or indirect shareholdings in these entities. A SPE is
consolidated if, based on an evaluation of the substance of its relationship with the Company
and the SPEs risks and rewards, the Company concludes that it controls the SPE. SPEs
controlled by the Company were established under terms that impose strict limitations on the
decision-making powers of the SPEs management and that result in the Company receiving the
majority of the benefits related to the SPEs operations and net assets, being exposed to
risks incident to the SPEs activities, and retaining the majority of the residual or
ownership risks related to the SPE or its assets.
Associates and jointly controlled entities (equity accounted investees)
Associates are those entities in which the Company has significant influence, but not
control, over the financial and operating policies. Significant influence is presumed to
exist when the Company holds between 20 and 50 percent of the voting power of another entity.
Joint ventures are those entities over whose activities the Company has joint control,
established by contractual agreement and requiring unanimous consent for strategic financial
and operating decisions. Associates and jointly controlled entities are accounted for using
the equity method (equity accounted investees) and are initially recognized at cost. The
condensed consolidated interim financial statements include the Companys share of the income
and expenses and equity movements of equity accounted investees, after adjustments to align
the accounting policies with those of the Company, from the date that significant influence
or joint control commences until the date that significant influence or joint control ceases.
When the Companys share of losses exceeds its interest in an equity accounted investee, the
carrying amount of that interest (including any long term investments) is reduced to zero and
the recognition of further losses is discontinued except to the extent that the Company has
an obligation or has made payments on behalf of the investee.
The Company does not consolidate entities where the minority shareholders have certain
significant participating rights that provide for effective involvement in significant
decisions in the ordinary course of business of such entities. Investments in such entities
are accounted by the equity method of accounting.
Transactions eliminated on consolidation
Intra-group balances and transactions, and any unrealized income and expenses arising from
intra-group transactions, are eliminated in preparing the condensed consolidated interim
financial statements. Unrealized gains arising from transactions with equity accounted
investees are eliminated against the investment to the extent of the Companys interest in
the investee. Unrealized losses are eliminated in the same way as unrealized gains, but only
to the extent that there is no evidence of impairment.
Foreign currency transactions
Transactions in
foreign currencies are translated to the respective functional currencies of
group entities at exchange rates at the dates of the transactions. Monetary assets and
liabilities denominated in foreign currencies at the reporting date are retranslated to the
functional currency at the exchange rate at that date. The foreign currency gain or loss on
monetary items is the difference between amortized cost in the functional currency at the
beginning of the period, adjusted for effective interest and payments during the period, and
the amortized cost in foreign currency translated at the exchange rate at the end of the
period. Non-monetary assets and liabilities denominated in foreign currencies that are
measured at fair value are retranslated to the functional currency at the exchange rate at
the date that the fair value was determined. Foreign currency differences arising upon
retranslation are recognized in profit or loss, except for differences arising upon
qualifying cash flow hedges, which are recognized directly in equity.
Foreign operations
The assets and liabilities of foreign operations, including goodwill and fair value
adjustments arising upon acquisition, are translated to reporting currency at exchange rates
at the reporting date. The income and expenses of
11
DR. REDDYS LABORATORIES LIMITED AND SUBSIDIARIES
UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED INTERIM FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(in thousands, except share and per share data)
3. |
|
Significant accounting policies (continued) |
|
b. |
|
Foreign currency (continued) |
foreign operations are translated to reporting currency at average rates prevailing during
the year.
Foreign currency differences are recognized directly in equity. Such differences have been
recognized in the foreign currency translation reserve (FCTR). When a foreign operation is
disposed of, in part or in full, the relevant amount in the FCTR is transferred to profit or
loss.
Foreign exchange gains and losses arising from a monetary item receivable from or payable to
a foreign operation, the settlement of which is neither planned nor likely in the foreseeable
future, are considered to form part of a net investment in a foreign operation and are
recognized directly in equity in the FCTR.
Non-derivative financial instruments
Non-derivative financial instruments is comprised of investments in equity and debt
securities, trade receivables, certain other assets, cash and cash equivalents, loans and
borrowings, and trade payables and certain other liabilities.
Non-derivative financial instruments are recognized initially at fair value plus, for
instruments not at fair value through profit or loss, any directly attributable transaction
costs. Subsequent to initial recognition non-derivative financial instruments are measured as
described below.
Cash and cash equivalents
Cash and cash equivalents is comprised of cash balances, current and time deposits with
banks. Bank overdrafts that are repayable on demand and form an integral part of the
Companys cash management are included as a component of cash and cash equivalents for the
purpose of the statement of cash flows.
Held-to-maturity investments
If the Company has the positive intent and ability to hold debt securities to maturity, then
they are classified as held-to-maturity. Held-to-maturity investments are measured at
amortized cost using the effective interest method, less any impairment losses.
Available-for-sale financial assets
The Companys investments in equity securities and certain debt securities are classified as
available-for-sale financial assets. Subsequent to initial recognition, they are measured at
fair value and changes therein, other than impairment losses and foreign exchange gains and
losses on available-for-sale monetary items, are recognized directly in equity. When an
investment is derecognized, the cumulative gain or loss in equity is transferred to profit or
loss.
Financial assets at fair value through profit or loss
An instrument is classified at fair value through profit or loss if it is held for trading or
is designated as such upon initial recognition. Financial instruments are designated at fair
value through profit or loss if the Company manages such investments and makes purchase and
sale decisions based on their fair value in accordance with the Companys documented risk
management or investment strategy. Upon initial recognition, attributable transaction costs
are recognized in profit or loss when incurred. Financial instruments at fair value through
profit or loss are measured at fair value, and changes therein are recognized in profit or
loss.
Other
Other non-derivative financial instruments are measured at amortized cost using the effective
interest method, less any impairment losses.
Derivative financial instruments
The Company holds derivative financial instruments to hedge its
foreign currency exposure. Derivatives
are recognized initially at fair value; attributable transaction costs are recognized in
profit or loss when incurred. Subsequent to
12
DR. REDDYS LABORATORIES LIMITED AND SUBSIDIARIES
UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED INTERIM FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(in thousands, except share and per share data)
3. |
|
Significant accounting policies (continued) |
|
c. |
|
Financial instruments (continued) |
initial recognition, derivatives are measured at fair value, and changes therein are
accounted for as described below.
Cash flow hedges
Changes in the fair value of the derivative hedging instrument designated as a cash flow
hedge are recognized directly in equity to the extent that the hedge is effective. To the
extent that the hedge is ineffective, changes in fair value are recognized in profit or loss.
If the hedging instrument no longer meets the criteria for hedge accounting, expires or is
sold, terminated or exercised, then hedge accounting is discontinued prospectively. The
cumulative gain or loss previously recognized in equity remains there until the forecast
transaction occurs. When the hedged item is a non-financial asset, the amount recognized in
equity is transferred to the carrying amount of the asset when it is recognized. In other
cases the amount recognized in equity is transferred to profit or loss in the same period
that the hedged item affects profit or loss.
Economic hedges
Hedge accounting is not applied to derivative instruments that economically hedge monetary
assets and liabilities denominated in foreign currencies. Changes in the fair value of such
derivatives are recognized in profit or loss as part of foreign currency gains and losses.
Share capital
Ordinary shares
Ordinary shares are classified as equity. Incremental costs directly attributable to the
issue of ordinary shares and share options are recognized as a deduction from equity, net of
any tax effects.
d. |
|
Property, plant and equipment |
Recognition and measurement
Items of property, plant and equipment including assets acquired under a finance lease are
measured at cost less accumulated depreciation and accumulated impairment losses. Cost
includes expenditures that are directly attributable to the acquisition of the asset. The
cost of self-constructed assets includes the cost of materials and direct labor, any other
costs directly attributable to bringing the asset to a working condition for its intended
use, and the costs of dismantling and removing the items and restoring the site on which they
are located. Purchased software that is integral to the functionality of the related
equipment is capitalized as part of that equipment. Borrowing costs that are directly
attributable to the acquisition, construction or production of a qualifying asset are
capitalized as part of the cost of that asset.
When parts of an item of property, plant and equipment have different useful lives, they are
accounted for as separate items (major components) of property, plant and equipment.
Gains and losses upon disposal of an item of property, plant and equipment are determined by
comparing the proceeds from disposal with the carrying amount of property, plant and
equipment and are recognized net within other income/expense, net in profit or loss.
Subsequent costs
The cost of replacing part of an item of property, plant and equipment is recognized in the
carrying amount of the item if it is probable that the future economic benefits embodied
within the part will flow to the Company and its cost can be measured reliably. The carrying
amount of the replaced part is derecognized. The costs of the day-to-day servicing of
property, plant and equipment are recognized in profit or loss as incurred.
Depreciation
Depreciation is recognized in profit or loss on a straight-line basis over the estimated
useful lives of each part of an item of property, plant and equipment. Leased assets are
depreciated over the shorter of the lease term and their useful lives, unless it is
reasonably certain that the Company will obtain ownership by the end of the lease term. Land
is not depreciated.
13
DR. REDDYS LABORATORIES LIMITED AND SUBSIDIARIES
UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED INTERIM FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(in thousands, except share and per share data)
3. |
|
Significant accounting policies (continued) |
|
d. |
|
Property, plant and equipment (continued) |
The estimated useful lives for the current and comparative periods are as follows:
|
|
|
Buildings |
|
|
- Factory and administrative buildings
|
|
25 - 50 years |
- Ancillary structures
|
|
3 - 15 years |
Plant and equipment
|
|
3 - 15 years |
Furniture, fixtures and office equipment
|
|
4 - 10 years |
Vehicles
|
|
4 - 5 years |
Computer equipment
|
|
3 - 5 years |
Depreciation methods, useful lives and residual values are reviewed at each reporting date.
Goodwill
Goodwill (negative goodwill) arises upon the acquisition of subsidiaries, associates and
joint ventures.
Acquisitions prior to April 1, 2007
As part of its transition to IFRS, the Company elected to restate only those business
combinations that occurred on or after April 1, 2007. In respect of acquisitions prior to
April 1, 2007, goodwill represents the amount recognized under Previous GAAP.
Acquisitions on or after April 1, 2007
For acquisitions on or after April 1, 2007, goodwill represents the excess of the cost of the
acquisition over the Companys interest in the net fair value of the identifiable assets,
liabilities and contingent liabilities of the acquiree. When the excess is negative
(negative goodwill), it is recognized immediately in profit or loss.
Acquisitions of minority interests
Goodwill arising upon the acquisition of a minority interest in a subsidiary represents the
excess of the cost of the additional investment over the carrying amount of the net assets
acquired at the date of exchange.
Subsequent measurement
Goodwill is measured at cost less accumulated impairment losses. In respect of equity
accounted investees, the carrying amount of goodwill is included in the carrying amount of
the investment.
Research and development
Expenditures on research activities, undertaken with the prospect of gaining new scientific
or technical knowledge and understanding, are recognized in profit or loss when incurred.
Development activities involve a plan or design for the production of new or substantially
improved products and processes. Development expenditures are capitalized only if development
costs can be measured reliably, the product or process is technically and commercially
feasible, future economic benefits are probable, and the Company intends to and has
sufficient resources to complete development and to use or sell the asset. The expenditures
capitalized include the cost of materials, direct labor and overhead costs that are directly
attributable to preparing the asset for its intended use. Borrowing
costs related to the development of qualifying assets are capitalized
as a part of the cost of that asset. Other
development expenditures are recognized in profit or loss as incurred.
Internal product development expenditures are capitalized only if they meet the recognition
criteria as mentioned above. Where regulatory and other uncertainties are such that the
criteria are not met, the expenditures are recognized in the
Companys income statement. This is almost
invariably the case prior to approval of the drug by the relevant
14
DR. REDDYS LABORATORIES LIMITED AND SUBSIDIARIES
UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED INTERIM FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(in thousands, except share and per share data)
3. |
|
Significant accounting policies (continued) |
|
e. |
|
Intangible assets (continued) |
regulatory authority. Where, however, the recognition criteria are met, intangible assets are
capitalized and amortized on a straight-line basis over their useful economic lives from
product launch. Payments to in-license products and compounds from external third parties
for new research and development projects (in-process research and development), generally
taking the form of up-front payments and milestones, are capitalized and amortized, generally
on a straight-line basis, over their useful economic lives from product launch.
Intangible assets relating to products in development (both internally generated and
externally acquired), other intangible assets not available for use and intangible assets
having indefinite useful life are subject to impairment testing at each balance sheet date.
All other intangible assets are tested for impairment when there are indications that the
carrying value may not be recoverable. Any impairment losses are recognized immediately in
the income statement. Trademarks with indefinite useful lives are tested for impairment
annually.
Capitalized development expenditures are measured at cost less accumulated amortization and
accumulated impairment losses.
Advances
paid for research and development activities are shown as other
receivables in the
balance sheet until the time that actual cost is incurred for such research and development
activities. Such amounts are capitalized or recognized as an expense, as the case may be, as
the related goods are delivered or the related services are performed.
Other intangible assets
Other intangible assets that are acquired by the Company, which have finite useful lives, are
measured at cost less accumulated amortization and accumulated impairment losses.
Subsequent expenditures
Subsequent expenditures are capitalized only when they increase the future economic benefits
embodied in the specific asset to which they relate. All other expenditures, including
expenditures on internally generated goodwill and brands, are recognized in profit or loss as
incurred.
Amortization
Amortization is recognized in profit or loss on a straight-line basis over the estimated
useful lives of intangible assets, other than for goodwill, intangible assets not available
for use and intangible assets having indefinite life, from the date that they are available
for use. The estimated useful lives for the current and comparative periods are as follows:
|
|
|
Trademarks with finite useful life
|
|
3 - 10 years |
Product related intangibles
|
|
6 - 15 years |
Beneficial toll manufacturing contract
|
|
24 months |
Non-competition arrangements
|
|
1.5 - 10 years |
Marketing rights
|
|
3 - 16 years |
Customer-related intangibles
|
|
2 - 11 years |
Other intangibles
|
|
5 - 15 years |
At the inception of a lease, the lease arrangement is classified as either a finance lease or
an operating lease, based on the substance of the lease arrangement.
Finance leases
A finance lease is recognized as an asset and a liability at the commencement of the lease,
at the lower of the fair value of the asset and the present value of the minimum lease
payments. Initial direct costs, if any, are also capitalized and,
15
DR. REDDYS LABORATORIES LIMITED AND SUBSIDIARIES
UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED INTERIM FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(in thousands, except share and per share data)
3. |
|
Significant accounting policies (continued) |
|
f. |
|
Leases (continued) |
subsequent to initial recognition, the asset is accounted for in accordance with the
accounting policy applicable to that asset. Minimum lease payments made under finance leases
are apportioned between the finance expense and the reduction of the outstanding liability.
The finance expense is allocated to each period during the lease term so as to produce a
constant periodic rate of interest on the remaining balance of the liability.
Operating leases
Other leases are operating leases and the leased assets are not recognized on the Companys
balance sheet. Payments made under operating leases are recognized in profit or loss on a
straight-line basis over the term of the lease.
Inventories consist of raw materials, stores and spares, work in progress and finished goods
and are measured at the lower of cost and net realizable value. The cost of all categories of
inventories, except stores and spares, is based on the first-in first-out principle. Stores
and spares is comprised of packing materials, engineering spares (such as machinery spare
parts) and consumables (such as lubricants, cotton waste and oils), which are used in
operating machines or consumed as indirect materials in the manufacturing process, where cost
is based on a weighted average method. Cost includes expenditures incurred in acquiring the
inventories, production or conversion costs and other costs incurred in bringing them to
their existing location and condition. In the case of finished goods and work in progress,
cost includes an appropriate share of overheads based on normal operating capacity. Net
realizable value is the estimated selling price in the ordinary course of business, less the
estimated costs of completion and selling expenses.
Financial assets
A financial asset is assessed at each reporting date to determine whether there is any
objective evidence that it is impaired. A financial asset is considered to be impaired if
objective evidence indicates that one or more events have had a negative effect on the
estimated future cash flows of that asset.
An impairment loss in respect of a financial asset measured at amortized cost is calculated
as the difference between its carrying amount, and the present value of the estimated future
cash flows discounted at the original effective interest rate. An impairment loss in respect
of an available-for-sale financial asset is calculated by reference to its fair value.
Individually significant financial assets are tested for impairment on an individual basis.
The remaining financial assets are assessed collectively in groups that share similar credit
risk characteristics.
All impairment losses are recognized in profit or loss. Any cumulative loss in respect of an
available-for-sale financial asset recognized previously in equity is transferred to profit
or loss. An impairment loss is reversed if the reversal can be related objectively to an
event occurring after the impairment loss was recognized. For financial assets measured at
amortized cost and available-for-sale financial assets that are debt securities, the reversal
is recognized in profit or loss. For available-for-sale financial assets that are equity
securities, the reversal is recognized directly in equity.
Non-financial assets
The carrying amounts of the Companys non-financial assets, other than inventories and
deferred tax assets are reviewed at each reporting date to determine whether there is any
indication of impairment. If any such indication exists, then the assets recoverable amount
is estimated. For goodwill and intangible assets that have indefinite lives or that are not
yet available for use, the recoverable amount is estimated each year at the same time.
The recoverable amount of an asset or cash-generating unit is the greater of its value in use
and its fair value less costs to sell. In assessing value in use, the estimated future cash
flows are discounted to their present value using a pre-tax discount rate that reflects
current market assessments of the time value of money and the risks specific to the
16
DR. REDDYS LABORATORIES LIMITED AND SUBSIDIARIES
UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED INTERIM FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(in thousands, except share and per share data)
3. |
|
Significant accounting policies (continued) |
|
h. |
|
Impairment (continued) |
asset. For the purpose of impairment testing, assets are grouped together into the smallest
group of assets that generates cash inflows from continuing use that are largely independent
of the cash inflows of other assets or groups of assets (the cash-generating unit). The
goodwill acquired in a business combination, for the purpose of impairment testing, is
allocated to cash-generating units that are expected to benefit from the synergies of the
combination.
An impairment loss is recognized if the carrying amount of an asset or its cash-generating
unit exceeds its estimated recoverable amount. Impairment losses are recognized in profit or
loss. Impairment losses recognized in respect of cash-generating units are allocated first to
reduce the carrying amount of any goodwill allocated to the units and then to reduce the
carrying amount of the other assets in the unit (group of units) on a pro rata basis.
An impairment loss in respect of goodwill is not reversed. In respect of other assets,
impairment losses recognized in prior periods are assessed at each reporting date for any
indications that the loss has decreased or no longer exists. An impairment loss is reversed
if there has been a change in the estimates used to determine the recoverable amount. An
impairment loss is reversed only to the extent that the assets carrying amount does not
exceed the carrying amount that would have been determined, net of depreciation or
amortization, if no impairment loss had been recognized.
Defined contribution plan
A defined contribution plan is a post-employment benefit plan under which an entity pays
fixed contributions into a separate entity and will have no legal or constructive obligation
to pay further amounts. Obligations for contributions to recognized
provident funds and approved superannuation schemes which are defined contribution plans are recognized
as an employee benefit expense in profit or loss when they are due.
Prepaid contributions are recognized as an asset to the extent that a cash refund or a
reduction in future payments is available.
Defined benefit plans
A defined benefit plan is a post-employment benefit plan other than a defined contribution
plan. The Companys net obligation in respect of an approved
gratuity plan, which is a
defined benefit plan, and certain other defined benefit plans is calculated separately for
each plan by estimating the amount of future benefit that employees have earned in return for
their service in the current and prior periods; that benefit is discounted to determine its
present value. Any unrecognized past service costs and the fair value of any plan assets are
deducted. The discount rate is the yield at the reporting date on risk free government bonds
that have maturity dates approximating the terms of the Companys obligations and that are
denominated in the same currency in which the benefits are expected to be paid. The
calculation is performed annually by a qualified actuary using the projected unit credit
method. When the calculation results in a benefit to the Company, the recognized asset is
limited to the net total of any unrecognized past service costs and the present value of any
future refunds from the plan or reductions in future contributions to the plan.
When the benefits of a plan are improved, the portion of the increased benefit relating to
past service by employees is recognized in profit or loss on a straight-line basis over the
average period until the benefits become vested. To the extent that the benefits vest
immediately, the expense is recognized immediately in profit or loss.
The Company recognizes actuarial gains and losses using the corridor method. Under this
method, to the extent that any cumulative unrecognized actuarial gain or loss exceeds 10% of
the greater of the present value of the defined benefit obligation and the fair value of plan
assets, that portion is recognized in income over the expected average remaining working
lives of the employees participating in the plan. Otherwise, the actuarial gain or loss is
not recognized.
17
DR. REDDYS LABORATORIES LIMITED AND SUBSIDIARIES
UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED INTERIM FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(in thousands, except share and per share data)
3. |
|
Significant accounting policies (continued) |
|
i. |
|
Employee benefits (continued) |
Termination benefits
Termination benefits are recognized as an expense when the Company is demonstrably committed,
without realistic possibility of withdrawal, to a formal detailed plan to either terminate
employment before the normal retirement date, or to provide termination benefits as a result
of an offer made to encourage voluntary redundancy. Termination benefits for voluntary
redundancies are recognized as an expense if the Company has made an offer encouraging
voluntary redundancy, it is probable that the offer will be accepted, and the number of
acceptances can be estimated reliably.
Short-term benefits
Short-term employee benefit obligations are measured on an undiscounted basis and are
expensed as the related service is provided.
A liability is recognized for the amount expected to be paid under short-term cash bonus or
profit-sharing plans if the Company has a present legal or constructive obligation to pay
this amount as a result of past service provided by the employee and the obligation can be
estimated reliably.
Compensated leave of absence
Eligible employees are entitled to accumulate compensated absences up to prescribed limits in
accordance with the Companys policy and receive cash in lieu thereof. The Company measures
the expected cost of accumulating compensated absences as the additional amount that the
Company entities expect to pay as a result of the unused entitlement that has accumulated at
the balance sheet date. Such measurement is based on actuarial valuation as at the balance
sheet date carried out by a qualified actuary.
Share-based payment transactions
The grant date fair value of options granted to employees, calculated using the Black-Scholes
model, is recognized as an employee expense, with a corresponding increase in equity, over
the period that the employees become unconditionally entitled to the options. The increase in
equity recognized in connection with a share based payment transaction is presented as a
separate component in equity. The amount recognized as an expense is adjusted to reflect the
actual number of share options that vest.
A provision is recognized if, as a result of a past event, the Company has a present legal or
constructive obligation that can be estimated reliably, and it is probable that an outflow of
economic benefits will be required to settle the obligation. If the effect of the time value
of money is material, provisions are determined by discounting the expected future cash flows
at a pre-tax rate that reflects current market assessments of the time value of money and the
risks specific to the liability. Where discounting is used, the increase in the provision due
to the passage of time is recognized as a finance cost.
Restructuring
A provision for restructuring is recognized when the Company has approved a detailed and
formal restructuring plan, and the restructuring either has commenced or has been announced
publicly. Future operating costs are not provided for.
Onerous contracts
A provision for onerous contracts is recognized when the expected benefits to be derived by
the Company from a contract are lower than the unavoidable cost of meeting its obligations
under the contract. The provision is measured at the present value of the lower of the
expected cost of terminating the contract and the expected net cost of continuing with the
contract. Before a provision is established, the Company recognizes any impairment loss on
the assets associated with that contract.
18
DR. REDDYS LABORATORIES LIMITED AND SUBSIDIARIES
UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED INTERIM FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(in thousands, except share and per share data)
3. |
|
Significant accounting policies (continued) |
|
k. |
|
Revenue |
Sale of goods
Revenue is recognized when the significant risks and rewards of ownership have been
transferred to the buyer, recovery of the consideration is probable, the associated costs and
possible return of goods can be estimated reliably, there is no continuing management
involvement with the goods and the amount of revenue can be measured reliably. Revenue from
the sale of goods includes excise duty and is measured at the fair value of the consideration
received or receivable, net of returns, sales tax and applicable trade discounts and
allowances.
Revenue from domestic sales of generic products is recognized upon delivery of products to
stockists by clearing and forwarding agents of the Company. Revenue from domestic sales of
active pharmaceutical ingredients and intermediates is recognized on delivery of products to
customers, from the factories of the Company. Revenue from export sales is recognized when
the significant risks and rewards of ownership of products are transferred to the customers,
which is based upon the terms of the applicable contract.
Sales of generics in India are made through clearing and forwarding agents to stockists.
Significant risks and rewards in respect of ownership of generic products are transferred by
the Company when the goods are delivered to stockists from clearing and forwarding agents.
Clearing and forwarding agents are generally compensated on a commission basis as a
percentage of sales made by them.
Sales of active pharmaceutical ingredients and intermediates in India are made directly to
the end customers generally, formulation manufacturers, from the factories of the Company.
Significant risks and rewards in respect of ownership of active pharmaceuticals ingredients
are transferred by the company on delivery of the products to the customers. Sales of active
pharmaceutical ingredients and intermediates outside India are made directly to the end
customers, generally stockists or formulations manufacturers, from the parent company or its
consolidated subsidiaries.
The Company has entered into marketing arrangements with certain marketing partners for sale
of goods in certain overseas territories. Under such arrangements, the Company sells generic
products to the marketing partners at a price agreed in the arrangement. Revenue is
recognized on these transactions upon delivery of products to the marketing partners. An
additional amount, representing profit share, is recognized as revenue, on the basis of
ultimate net sale proceeds, only when realization is certain.
Provisions for chargeback, rebates, discounts and medicaid payments are estimated and
provided for in the year of sales and recorded as reduction of revenue. A chargeback claim is
a claim made by the wholesaler for the difference between the price at which the product is
initially invoiced to the wholesaler and the net price at which it is agreed to be procured
from the Company. Provision for such chargebacks are accrued and estimated based on
historical average chargeback rate actually claimed over a period of time, current contract
prices with wholesalers/other customers and average inventory holding by the wholesaler. Such
provisions are disclosed as a reduction of trade receivable.
The Company accounts for sales returns by recording an accrual based on the Companys
estimate of expected sales returns. The Company deals in various products and operates in
various markets. Accordingly, the Companys estimate of sales returns is determined primarily
by its experience in these markets. In respect of established products, the Company
determines an estimate of sales returns accrual primarily based on historical experience of
such sales returns. Additionally, other factors that the Company considers in determining the
estimate include levels of inventory in the distribution channel, estimated shelf life,
product discontinuances, price changes of competitive products, and introduction of
competitive new products, to the extent each of these factors impact the Companys
19
DR. REDDYS LABORATORIES LIMITED AND SUBSIDIARIES
UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED INTERIM FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(in thousands, except share and per share data)
3. |
|
Significant accounting policies (continued) |
|
k. |
|
Revenue (continued) |
business and markets. The Company considers all these factors and adjusts the sales return
accrual to reflect its actual experience. With respect to new products introduced by the
Company, those are either extensions of an existing line of product or in a general
therapeutic category where the Company has historical experience. The Companys new product
launches have historically been in therapeutic categories where established products exist
and are sold either by the Company or its competitors. The Company has not yet introduced
products in a new therapeutic category where the sales returns experience of such products is
not known. The amount of sales returns for the Companys newly launched products do not
significantly differ from sales returns experience of current products marketed by the
Company or its competitors (as the Company understands based on industry publications).
Accordingly, the Company does not expect sales returns for new products to be significantly
different from expected sales returns of current products. The Company evaluates sales
returns of all its products at the end of each reporting period and records necessary
adjustments, if any.
Services
Revenue from services rendered, which primarily relate to contract research, is recognized in
profit or loss in proportion to the stage of completion of the transaction at the reporting
date. The stage of completion is assessed by reference to cost incurred as a percentage of
total expected cost.
License fees
Non-refundable milestone payments are recognized in the consolidated statement of operations
as and when related services are rendered or agreed milestones are achieved in accordance
with the terms of the license agreement, and when the Company has no future obligations or
continuing involvement pursuant to such milestone payments. Non-refundable up-front license
fees are deferred and recognized when the milestones are earned, in proportion to the amount
of each milestone earned bears to the total milestone payments agreed in the license
agreement. Where the upfront license fees are a composite amount and cannot be attributed to
a specific molecule, they are amortized over the development period. The milestone payments
increase during the development period as the risk involved decreases. The agreed milestone
payments reflect the progress of the development of the molecule and may not be spread evenly
over the development period. Accordingly, the milestone payments are a fair representation of
the extent of progress made in the development of these underlying molecules. In the event
the development of a molecule is discontinued, the corresponding amount of deferred revenue
is recognized in the consolidated statement of operations in the period in which the project
is terminated.
The
Company has entered into certain dossier sales, licensing
arrangements and supply arrangements that
include certain performance obligations. Based on an evaluation of whether or not these
obligations are inconsequential or perfunctory, the Company defers the upfront payments
received under these arrangements. Such deferred revenue is recognized in the consolidated
statement of operations in the period in which the Company completes remaining performance
obligations.
Export entitlements
Export entitlements are recognized as income when the right to receive credit as per the
terms of the scheme is established in respect of the exports made and where there is no
significant uncertainty regarding the ultimate collection of the relevant export proceeds.
l. |
|
Finance income and expenses |
Finance income is comprised of interest income on funds invested (including
available-for-sale financial assets), dividend income, gains on the disposal of
available-for-sale financial assets, changes in the fair value of financial assets at fair
value through profit or loss, and gains on hedging instruments that are recognized in profit
or loss. Interest income is recognized as it accrues in profit or loss, using the effective
interest method. Dividend income is recognized in profit or loss on the date that the
Companys right to receive payment is established.
Finance expenses is comprised of interest expense on loans and borrowings, unwinding of the
discount on provisions, changes in the fair value of financial assets at fair value through
profit or loss, impairment losses recognized on
20
DR. REDDYS LABORATORIES LIMITED AND SUBSIDIARIES
UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED INTERIM FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(in thousands, except share and per share data)
3. |
|
Significant accounting policies (continued) |
|
l. |
|
Finance income and expenses (continued) |
financial assets, and losses on hedging instruments that are recognized in profit or loss.
All borrowing costs are recognized in profit or loss using the effective interest method.
Foreign currency gains and losses are reported on a net basis.
Income tax expense is comprised of current and deferred tax. Income tax expense is recognized
in profit or loss except to the extent that it relates to items recognized directly in
equity, in which case it is recognized in equity.
Current tax is the expected tax payable on the taxable income for the year, using tax rates
enacted or substantively enacted at the reporting date, and any adjustment to tax payable in
respect of previous years.
Deferred tax is recognized using the balance sheet method, providing for temporary
differences between the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities for financial reporting
purposes and the amounts used for taxation purposes. Deferred tax is not recognized for the
following temporary differences: the initial recognition of assets or liabilities in a
transaction that is not a business combination and that affects neither accounting nor
taxable profit, and differences relating to investments in subsidiaries and jointly
controlled entities to the extent that it is probable that they will not reverse in the
foreseeable future. In addition, deferred tax is not recognized for taxable temporary
differences arising upon the initial recognition of goodwill. Deferred tax is measured at the
tax rates that are expected to be applied to the temporary differences when they reverse,
based on the laws that have been enacted or substantively enacted by the reporting date.
Deferred tax assets and liabilities are offset if there is a legally enforceable right to
offset current tax liabilities and assets, and they relate to income taxes levied by the same
tax authority on the same taxable entity, or on different tax entities, but they intend to
settle current tax liabilities and assets on a net basis or their tax assets and liabilities
will be realized simultaneously.
A deferred tax asset is recognized to the extent that it is probable that future taxable
profits will be available against which the temporary difference can be utilized. Deferred
tax assets are reviewed at each reporting date and are reduced to the extent that it is no
longer probable that the related tax benefit will be realized.
Additional income taxes that arise from the distribution of dividends are recognized at the
same time as the liability to pay the related dividend is recognized.
The
Company presents basic and diluted earnings per share
(EPS) data for its ordinary shares. Basic EPS is calculated by dividing
the profit or loss attributable to ordinary shareholders of the Company by the weighted average number of
ordinary shares outstanding during the period. Diluted EPS is determined by adjusting the profit or loss attributable to
ordinary shareholders and the weighted average number of ordinary shares outstanding for the
effects of all dilutive potential ordinary shares, which is comprised of share options
granted to employees.
o. |
|
New standards and interpretations not yet adopted |
A
number of new standards, and interpretations and amendments to
standards and interpretations,
are not yet effective for the year ending March 31, 2009, and have not been applied in
preparing these condensed consolidated interim financial statements:
|
|
|
Revised IAS 1, Presentation of Financial Statements (2007) becomes mandatory for
the Companys consolidated financial statements for the year ending March 31, 2010 and
is not expected to have any material impact on the presentation of the consolidated
financial statements. |
|
|
|
|
Revised IFRS 3, Business Combinations (2008) becomes mandatory for the Companys
consolidated financial statements for the year ending March 31, 2011, and will be
applied prospectively. |
21
DR. REDDYS LABORATORIES LIMITED AND SUBSIDIARIES
UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED INTERIM FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(in thousands, except share and per share data)
3. |
|
Significant accounting policies (continued) |
|
o. |
|
New standards and interpretations not yet adopted
(continued)
|
|
|
|
Amended IAS 27, Consolidated and Separate Financial Statements (2008) becomes
mandatory for the Companys consolidated financial statements for the year ending
March 31, 2011, and will be applied prospectively. |
|
|
|
|
Amendment to IFRS 2, Share-based Payment Vesting Conditions and Cancellations
becomes mandatory for the Companys consolidated financial statements for the year
ending March 31, 2010, with retrospective application. The Company is currently in the
process of evaluating the potential impact of the revised standard on its consolidated
financial statements. |
|
|
|
|
Amendments to IAS 32, Financial Instruments: Presentation and IAS 1 Presentation of
Financial Statements Puttable Financial Instruments and Obligations Arising on
Liquidation becomes mandatory for the Companys consolidated financial statements for
the year ending March 31, 2010 and retrospective application is permitted. The adoption
of this standard is not expected to have any material impact on the consolidated
financial statements. |
|
|
|
|
Revised IAS 23, Borrowing Costs becomes mandatory for the Companys consolidated
financial statements for the year ending March 31, 2010. As the Company currently
follows a policy of capitalizing borrowing costs, this new standard will have no impact
on the Companys consolidated financial statements. |
|
|
|
|
IFRIC 13, Customer Loyalty Programmes becomes mandatory for the Companys
consolidated financial statements for the year ending March 31, 2010 and is not expected
to have any impact on the consolidated financial statements. |
|
|
|
|
IFRIC 14, IAS 19 The Limit on a Defined Benefit Asset, Minimum Funding
Requirements and their Interaction becomes mandatory for the Companys consolidated
financial statements for the year ending March 31, 2010 and is not expected to have any
material impact on its consolidated financial statements. |
p. |
|
Standards early adopted |
|
|
|
IFRS 8, Operating Segments, introduces the management approach to segment
reporting. IFRS 8 is mandatory for the Companys consolidated financial statements for
the year ending March 31, 2010. IFRS 8 requires presentation and disclosure of segment
information based on the internal reports regularly reviewed by the Companys Chief
Operating Decision Maker in order to assess each segments performance and to allocate
resources to them. The Company has early adopted IFRS 8 and presented segment
information in respect of its operating segments in its unaudited condensed consolidated
interim financial statements following the management approach, based on the internal
reports regularly reviewed by the Companys Chief Operating Decision Maker. |
4. |
|
Explanation of transition to IFRS |
As stated in Note 2(a), these are the Companys first condensed consolidated interim
financial statements which are part of the period covered by the first annual
consolidated financial statements prepared in accordance with IFRS.
In
preparing these condensed consolidated interim financial statements, the Company has availed itself of certain exemptions and
exceptions in accordance with IFRS 1.
a. |
|
Exemptions from retrospective application |
|
Following are the exemptions which the Company has opted to apply or not to apply: |
|
i. |
|
Business combinations exemption: The Company has applied the exemption as
provided in IFRS 1 on non-application of IFRS 3, Business Combinations to business
combinations consummated prior to April 1, 2007 (the Transition Date), pursuant to
which goodwill arising from business combination has been stated at the carrying
amount prior to the date of transition under Previous GAAP. The Company has also
applied the |
22
DR. REDDYS LABORATORIES LIMITED AND SUBSIDIARIES
UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED INTERIM FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(in thousands, except share and per share data)
4. |
|
Explanation of transition to IFRS (continued) |
a. |
|
Exemptions from retrospective application (continued) |
|
|
|
exemption for past business combinations to acquisitions of investments in associates
consummated prior to the Transition Date. |
|
|
ii. |
|
Fair value as deemed cost exemption: The Company has not elected to
measure any item of property, plant and equipment at its fair value at the
Transition Date; property, plant and equipment have been measured at cost in
accordance with IFRS. |
|
|
iii. |
|
Employee benefits exemption: The Company has elected to apply the
exemption as provided in IFRS 1 and recognized cumulative actuarial gains and losses
as of the Transition Date as an adjustment to the opening retained earnings. The
Company will continue to apply the corridor approach in subsequent periods. |
|
|
iv. |
|
Cumulative translation differences exemption: The Company had accumulated
the translation differences in a separate component of equity under Previous GAAP.
Upon transition to IFRS, the treatment of recording translation differences in
equity did not undergo any change and consequently the optional exemption of setting
cumulative differences as zero and reclassifying the amount recognized in accordance
with Previous GAAP as retained earnings as at the Transition Date was not required
to be applied. |
|
|
v. |
|
Compound financial instruments: The Company did not have any compound
financial instrument as of the Transition Date. Consequently, upon adoption of IFRS
the optional exemption allowed of non-segregation of the liability component if such
component was no longer outstanding on the Transition Date is not applicable to the
Company. |
|
|
vi. |
|
Assets and liabilities of subsidiaries, associates and joint ventures
exemption: All entities of the Company are transitioning to IFRS on the same date.
Consequently, this exemption is not applicable to the Company. |
|
|
vii. |
|
Share-based payment transaction exemption: Under Previous GAAP, the
Company had applied the fair value recognition and measurement
principles similar to those prescribed
under IFRS 2 for all options granted before the Transition Date. Consequently, upon
transition to IFRS, the optional exemption is not applicable to the Company. |
|
|
viii. |
|
Fair value measurement of financial assets or liabilities at initial
recognition: The Company has not applied the amendment offered by the revision of
IAS 39, Financial Instruments: Recognition and Measurement, upon the initial
recognition of the financial instruments measured at fair value through the income
statement where there is no active market. |
|
|
ix. |
|
Designation of financial assets and financial liabilities exemption: The
Company did not have any financial assets or liabilities as of the Transition Date
which were required to be designated and which met the required criteria given in
IFRS 1 as a financial asset or financial liability at fair value through profit or
loss. |
|
|
x. |
|
Changes in decommissioning liabilities included in the cost of property,
plant and equipment exemption: The Company does not have any material
decommissioning liabilities in the cost of property, plant and equipment.
Consequently, this exception is not applicable to the Company. |
|
|
xi. |
|
Leases exemption: The Company has no arrangements containing a lease as
defined under IFRIC 4, Determining whether an arrangement contains a lease.
Consequently, this exemption is not applicable to the Company. |
|
|
xii. |
|
Financial asset or an intangible asset accounted for in accordance with
IFRIC 12, Service Concession Arrangements exemption: The Company has no arrangements
which would be classified under Service Concession Arrangements. Consequently, this
exemption is not applicable to the Company. |
|
|
xiii. |
|
Insurance contracts: The Company does not issue any insurance contracts.
Consequently, this exemption is not applicable to the Company. |
23
DR. REDDYS LABORATORIES LIMITED AND SUBSIDIARIES
UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED INTERIM FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(in thousands, except share and per share data)
4. |
|
Explanation of transition to IFRS (continued) |
b. |
|
Exceptions from full retrospective application |
|
i. |
|
Derecognition of financial assets and liabilities exception: Financial
assets and liabilities derecognized before January 1, 2004 are not re-recognized
under IFRS. No arrangements were identified that had to be assessed under this
exception. |
|
|
ii. |
|
Hedge accounting exception: The Company has not
identified any hedging relationships existing as of the Transition
Date. Consequently, this exception of not reflecting in its opening
IFRS statement of financial position a hedging relationship of a type
that does not qualify for hedge accounting under IAS 39 is not
applicable to the Company. |
|
|
iii. |
|
Estimates exception: Upon an assessment of the estimates made under
Previous GAAP, the Company has concluded that there was no necessity to revise such
estimates under IFRS except as a part of transition where estimates were required by
IFRS and not required by Previous GAAP or where estimates made under Previous GAAP
were to be revised to comply with IFRS, but such estimates reflected the conditions
as at the Transition Date. |
|
|
iv. |
|
Assets classified as held for sale and discontinued operations: The
Company has not classified any asset as held for sale and therefore this exception is
not applicable. |
The accounting policies as stated above have been applied in preparing the condensed
consolidated interim financial statements for the three months ended June 30, 2008, the
comparative information for the three months ended June 30, 2007, the consolidated financial
statements for the year ended March 31, 2008 and the preparation of an opening IFRS balance
sheet at April 1, 2007. In preparing its opening IFRS balance sheet, comparative information
for the three months ended June 30, 2007 and financial statements for the year ended
March 31, 2008, the Company has adjusted amounts reported previously in financial statements
prepared in accordance with Previous GAAP.
An explanation of how the transition from Previous GAAP to IFRS has affected the Companys
financial position, financial performance and cash flows is set out in the following tables
and the Notes that accompany the tables.
i. Reconciliation
of equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As at |
|
|
|
Notes |
|
|
April 1, 2007 |
|
|
June 30, 2007 |
|
|
March 31, 2008 |
|
Total equity under Previous GAAP |
|
|
|
|
|
Rs. |
41,578,228 |
|
|
Rs. |
43,095,139 |
|
|
Rs. |
47,066,584 |
|
Impairment impact on intangibles |
|
|
A |
|
|
|
621,311 |
|
|
|
621,311 |
|
|
|
99,315 |
|
Amortization reversal on intangibles impaired |
|
|
A |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,070 |
|
|
|
26,472 |
|
Employee benefits |
|
|
B |
|
|
|
(25,573 |
) |
|
|
(67,985 |
) |
|
|
16,413 |
|
Fringe benefit tax on employee stock options |
|
|
D |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(61,147 |
) |
|
|
(52,946 |
) |
Tax adjustments |
|
|
E |
|
|
|
453,957 |
|
|
|
313,711 |
|
|
|
169,508 |
|
Foreign
exchange rate impact on above adjustments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5,021 |
) |
|
|
25,468 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity
under IFRS before reclassification of minority interest |
|
|
|
|
|
|
42,627,923 |
|
|
|
43,900,078 |
|
|
|
47,350,814 |
|
Minority interest |
|
|
F |
|
|
|
10,473 |
|
|
|
7,450 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total equity under IFRS |
|
|
|
|
|
Rs. |
42,638,396 |
|
|
Rs. |
43,907,528 |
|
|
Rs. |
47,350,814 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ii. Reconciliation of profit for the period
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For three months ended |
|
|
For the Year ended |
|
|
|
Notes |
|
June 30, 2007 |
|
|
March 31, 2008 |
|
Profit under Previous GAAP |
|
|
|
|
|
Rs. |
1,825,068 |
|
|
Rs. |
4,678,042 |
|
Impairment impact on intangibles |
|
|
A |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(521,996 |
) |
Amortization reversed on intangibles impaired |
|
|
A |
|
|
|
4,070 |
|
|
|
26,472 |
|
Employee benefits |
|
|
B |
|
|
|
(42,412 |
) |
|
|
(18,693 |
) |
Cash flow hedge related adjustments |
|
|
C |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(25,490 |
) |
Fringe benefit tax on employee stock options |
|
|
D |
|
|
|
(61,147 |
) |
|
|
(52,946 |
) |
Tax adjustments |
|
|
E |
|
|
|
(140,246 |
) |
|
|
(257,015 |
) |
Minority Interest |
|
|
F |
|
|
|
(3,023 |
) |
|
|
(10,473 |
) |
Foreign exchange rate impact on above adjustments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,332 |
|
|
|
18,372 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Profit under IFRS |
|
|
|
|
|
Rs. |
1,596,642 |
|
|
Rs. |
3,836,273 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24
DR. REDDYS LABORATORIES LIMITED AND SUBSIDIARIES
UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED INTERIM FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(in thousands, except share and per share data)
4. |
|
Explanation of transition to IFRS (continued) |
c. |
|
Reconciliations (continued) |
iii. Notes to reconciliation
A. Impairment
Under Previous GAAP, impairment testing for an amortizable asset is a two step process.
First, it is tested for impairment by comparing the undiscounted future cash flow projections
with the carrying value of the asset. If upon comparison the carrying value exceeds the
undiscounted cash flows then, under the second step, an impairment charge is recognized for
the difference between carrying amount of the asset and the fair value thereof computed using
a discounted cash flow approach. Under IFRS, there is only a one step process, wherein
impairment is tested and recognized if upon comparison, the carrying value of the asset
exceeds the discounted cash flows. The differential approach resulted in additional
impairment being recorded.
Furthermore, under Previous GAAP a non-amortizable asset was tested for impairment at the
asset level, whereas under IFRS the impairment testing was done at higher cash generating
unit level, as it did not generate identifiable cash inflows independent from other assets.
Impairment testing at such higher cash generating unit level under IFRS did not indicate any
impairment and, accordingly, there was a reversal of impairment charge with respect to such
non-amortizable assets.
The aforesaid differences have resulted in an increase in equity under IFRS by Rs.621,311,
Rs.621,311 and Rs.99,315 as at April 1, 2007, June 30, 2007 and March 31, 2008, respectively,
and a decrease in profit under IFRS by Rs.521,996 for the year ended March 31, 2008.
Furthermore, the consequential amortization impact of subsequent periods has been reversed.
The impact of reversal of amortization resulted in an increase in equity under IFRS by
Rs.4,070 and Rs.26,472 as at June 30, 2007 and March 31,
2008, respectively, and an increase
in profit by Rs.4,070 and Rs.26,472 for the three months ended June 30, 2007 and the year
ended March 31, 2008, respectively.
B. Employee benefits
Under Previous GAAP, in determining the liability in respect of employment benefits, the
Company used discounting rates which were based on high-quality fixed-income investments
prevalent at the reporting date. Under IFRS, the Company is required to use high quality
corporate bond rates or, in the absence of a deep market for such bonds, the government bond
rate is required to be used. The Company has used the government bond rates for actuarially
valuing its defined benefit obligations, which resulted in an increase in the liability and,
consequently, the net period benefit cost in each of the reporting periods.
Furthermore, until April 1, 2007, the Company used the corridor approach to record actuarial
gains and losses under Previous GAAP. Upon adoption of IFRS, the Company elected to recognize
all cumulative actuarial gains and losses in respect of defined benefit plans at April 1,
2007 (the date of transition) as an adjustment to opening retained earnings and has set the
corridor to zero. Also, under Previous GAAP, the Company had recorded actuarial gains and
losses as part of equity, which is not required under IFRS, thereby resulting in a reduced
liability in the books with a corresponding positive impact on equity.
The aforesaid differences have resulted in a decrease in equity under IFRS by Rs.25,573 and
Rs.67,985 as at April 1, 2007 and June 30, 2007,
respectively, and increase in equity by
Rs.16,413 as at March 31, 2008. Consequently, it also resulted in a decrease of profit under
IFRS by Rs.42,412 and Rs.18,693 for the three months ended June 30, 2007 and year ended
March 31, 2008, respectively.
C. Hedge accounting
Under Previous GAAP, for certain hedge relationships where the hedging instrument is an
option, a terminal value approach to the assessment of effectiveness and measurement of
ineffectiveness was adopted as permitted by Derivatives Implementation Group (DIG) Issue
G20. Under IFRS, in the absence of any specific guidance that permits entities to adopt a
terminal value approach for such relationships, hedge effectiveness is measured on the basis
of intrinsic value and time value changes are excluded from these qualifying hedge
relationships. Accordingly, for certain hedging relationships which were accounted as a cash
flow hedge under Previous GAAP, the requirement of hedge accounting for the risk previously
designated as the hedged risk are no longer met. Accordingly, under IFRS the fair value
changes on certain options contracts are recognized in the income
statement as compared to being recognized in
equity under Previous GAAP.
25
DR. REDDYS LABORATORIES LIMITED AND SUBSIDIARIES
UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED INTERIM FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(in thousands, except share and per share data)
4. |
|
Explanation of transition to IFRS (continued) |
c. |
|
Reconciliations (continued) |
The aforesaid differences have resulted in a decrease of profit under IFRS by Rs.25,490 for
the year ended March 31, 2008.
D. Fringe benefit tax on employee share based payments
Indian tax regulations require the Company to pay a Fringe Benefit Tax upon the exercise of
employee stock options. Under Previous GAAP, Fringe Benefit Tax is accrued upon the exercise
of stock options. Under IFRS such Fringe Benefit Tax, if not recovered from employees, are
accrued over the vesting period of the stock options. In the event, the Company decides to
recover the related Fringe Benefit Tax from the employees exercising such options a
reimbursement asset is recognized in the same period which offsets the accrual for the Fringe
Benefit Tax.
The aforesaid differences have resulted in a decrease in equity under IFRS by Rs.61,147 and
Rs.52,946 as of June 30, 2008 and March 31, 2008,
respectively, and a decrease of profit under
IFRS by Rs.61,147 and Rs.52,946 for the three months ended
June 30, 2007 and the year ended
March 31, 2008, respectively.
E. Tax adjustments
Intra-group transactions are eliminated upon consolidation. Under Previous GAAP, income taxes
paid by the seller on intra-group profits in respect of assets that remain within the
consolidated group, including the tax effect of any reversing temporary differences in the
sellers tax jurisdiction, are deferred. The amount is recognized in other assets or
liabilities in the balance sheet until such time as the asset leaves the consolidated group,
at which point the amount is reclassified to income tax expense. Under IFRS, any related
deferred tax effects are measured based upon the tax rate of the purchaser. However, the tax
effects are not eliminated unless the transacting entities are subject to the same tax rate.
Furthermore, the income tax expense recognized in each interim period under Previous GAAP is
based on the best estimate of the weighted average effective income tax rate expected for the
annual reporting period applied to the pre-tax income of the interim period. Under Previous
GAAP, a consolidated Annual Effective Tax Rate is arrived at based upon projected tax expense
and profit before taxes for each of the tax jurisdictions and then such consolidated Annual
Effective Tax Rate is applied to consolidated profits for the quarter. Under IFRS, if
different income tax rates apply to different tax jurisdictions, income tax expense is
computed by applying the projected Annual Effective Tax Rate for each of the jurisdictions on
the pre-tax income of the interim period for each of such jurisdictions, respectively.
The above differences in IFRS as compared to Previous GAAP, along with the tax impact of the
adjustments as discussed above, have resulted in an increase in equity by Rs.453,957,
Rs.313,711 and Rs.169,508 as of April 1, 2007, June 30, 2007 and March 31, 2008,
respectively, and a decrease in profit by Rs.140,246 and Rs.257,015 for the three months
ended June 30, 2007 and the year ended March 31, 2008, respectively.
F. Change in presentation of minority interest
Under IFRS, minority interest is reported as a separate item within equity. Previous GAAP
requires minority interest to be presented separately from equity. Under IFRS, the
minoritys share of net income is presented as an allocation of net income, whereas, under
Previous GAAP, the minoritys share of net income is considered in determining net income.
The aforesaid differences have resulted in an increase of equity under IFRS by Rs.10,473 and
Rs.7,450 as of April 1, 2007 and June 30, 2007, respectively, and a decrease of profit under
IFRS by Rs.3,023 and Rs.10,473 for the three months ended June 30, 2007 and the year ended
March 31, 2008, respectively.
iv. Explanation of material adjustments to the cash flow statement
Unlike Previous GAAP, under IFRS while bank overdrafts are disclosed as part of borrowings in
the balance sheet, the same are reduced from cash and cash equivalents in preparation of the
cash flows if they are repayable on demand and form an integral part of the Companys cash
management. There were bank overdrafts of Rs.526,030 as at April 1, 2007 and Rs.434,928 as at
March 31, 2008 that were repayable on demand, and which formed
an integral part of the
Companys cash management and were not considered as a reduction in cash and cash
equivalents. Accordingly,
26
DR. REDDYS LABORATORIES LIMITED AND SUBSIDIARIES
UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED INTERIM FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(in thousands, except share and per share data)
4. |
|
Explanation of transition to IFRS (continued) |
c. |
|
Reconciliations (continued) |
|
|
|
the movement in such balances was classified as financing cash
flows under Previous GAAP. These have now been reclassified under cash and cash equivalents
under IFRS for the preparation of cash flow statements. |
|
|
|
|
In addition, restricted cash of Rs.606,159 as at April 1, 2007, Rs.20,223 as at June 30, 2007
and Rs.23,156 as at March 31, 2008 was not considered as cash and cash equivalents for the
preparation of cash flow statements. Accordingly, movement in such balances was classified
as investing cash flows under Previous GAAP. These have now been reclassified as cash and
cash equivalents under IFRS. |
|
|
|
|
Furthermore, interest paid of Rs.363,254 and interest received of Rs.263,591 for the three
months ended June 30, 2007 was classified as operating cash flows under Previous GAAP and
have been reclassified as financing and investing cash flows,
respectively, under IFRS. There
were no other material differences between the cash flow statement presented under IFRS and
the cash flow statement presented under Previous GAAP. |
|
|
|
The Chief Operating Decision Maker (CODM) evaluates the Companys performance and allocates
resources based on an analysis of various performance indicators by operating segments. The
operating segments reviewed by the CODM are as follows: |
|
|
|
Pharmaceutical Services and Active Ingredients (PSAI); |
|
|
|
|
Global Generics; and |
|
|
|
|
Proprietary Products |
|
|
|
Pharmaceutical Services and Active Ingredients. This segment includes active pharmaceutical
ingredients and intermediaries, also known as active pharmaceutical products or bulk drugs,
which are the principal ingredients for finished pharmaceutical products. Active
pharmaceutical ingredients and intermediaries become finished pharmaceutical products when
the dosages are fixed in a form ready for human consumption such as a tablet, capsule or
liquid using additional inactive ingredients. This segment also includes contract research
services and the manufacture and sale of active pharmaceutical ingredients and steroids in
accordance with the specific customer requirements. Thus, this
segment was formed by aggregating our former active pharmaceutical
ingredients and intermediates segment and custom pharmaceutical
services segment. |
|
|
|
|
Global Generics. This segment consists of finished pharmaceutical products ready for
consumption by the patient, marketed under a brand name (branded formulations) or as generic
finished dosages with therapeutic equivalence to branded formulations (generics). The Company
is transitioning to a new organization structure for this segment. While the resource
allocation is done by the CODM at the global generics level, certain additional information
(revenue and gross profit) with respect to the Companys formulations and generics business
continues to be reviewed by the CODM. Accordingly such further detailed information has also
been included in this segments disclosure. |
|
|
|
|
Proprietary Products. This segment involves the discovery of new chemical entities for
subsequent commercialization and out-licensing. It also involves the Companys specialty
pharmaceuticals business which is positioning to launch sales and marketing operations for
in-licensed and co-developed dermatology products. |
|
|
|
|
The CODM reviews gross profit as the performance indicator for all three of the above
segments. The Company does not review the total assets and liabilities for each segment. The
property, plant and equipment used in the Companys business, and the related depreciation
and amortization expenses, are not fully identifiable with or allocable to individual
reportable segments, as certain assets are used interchangeably between segments. The other
assets are not
specifically allocable to the segments. Consequently, management believes that it is not
practicable to provide segment disclosures relating to total assets and liabilities since
allocation among the various segments is not possible. |
27
DR. REDDYS LABORATORIES LIMITED AND SUBSIDIARIES
UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED INTERIM FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(in thousands, except share and per share data)
5. |
|
Segment reporting (continued) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Information about segments:
|
|
For the three months ended June 30, |
Segments |
|
PSAI |
|
Global Generics * |
|
Proprietary Products |
|
Others |
|
Total |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Segment revenue (Note 1) |
|
Rs. |
4,613,286 |
|
|
Rs. |
3,634,318 |
|
|
Rs. |
10,286,939 |
|
|
Rs. |
8,228,196 |
|
|
Rs. |
38,483 |
|
|
Rs. |
52,454 |
|
|
Rs. |
99,095 |
|
|
Rs. |
68,090 |
|
|
Rs. |
15,037,803 |
|
|
Rs. |
11,983,058 |
|
|
|
|
Gross profit |
|
Rs. |
1,499,218 |
|
|
Rs. |
1,244,335 |
|
|
Rs. |
5,941,815 |
|
|
Rs. |
4,878,313 |
|
|
Rs. |
30,833 |
|
|
Rs. |
33,161 |
|
|
Rs. |
22,471 |
|
|
Rs. |
(86,931 |
) |
|
Rs. |
7,494,337 |
|
|
Rs. |
6,068,878 |
|
Selling, general and
administrative expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,085,351 |
|
|
|
3,581,305 |
|
Research and development expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,050,070 |
|
|
|
806,278 |
|
Other expense/(income), net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
241,104 |
|
|
|
(82,681 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Results from operating activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,117,812 |
|
|
|
1,763,976 |
|
Finance income, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
77,030 |
|
|
|
158,409 |
|
Share of profit/(loss) of equity
accounted investees |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
297 |
|
|
|
(4,028 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Profit before income tax |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,195,139 |
|
|
|
1,918,357 |
|
Income tax expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(83,846 |
) |
|
|
(321,715 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Profit for the period |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rs. |
1,111,293 |
|
|
Rs. |
1,596,642 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note 1:
Segment revenue for the three months ended June 30, 2008 does
not include inter-segment revenues from PSAI to Global Generics which
is accounted for at cost of Rs.584,550 (as compared to Rs.460,157 for
the three months ended
June 30, 2007) and inter-segment revenues from Global Generics
to PSAI which is accounted for at cost of Rs.4,437 (as compared to
Rs.0 for the three months ended June 30, 2007).
* Global Generics consists of:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Segments |
|
Formulations |
|
Generics |
|
Global generics |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
Segment revenue (Note 2) |
|
Rs. |
4,489,215 |
|
|
Rs. |
4,051,195 |
|
|
Rs. |
5,797,724 |
|
|
Rs. |
4,177,001 |
|
|
Rs. |
10,286,939 |
|
|
Rs. |
8,228,196 |
|
Gross profit |
|
Rs. |
3,294,121 |
|
|
Rs. |
2,906,054 |
|
|
Rs. |
2,647,694 |
|
|
Rs. |
1,972,259 |
|
|
Rs. |
5,941,815 |
|
|
Rs. |
4,878,313 |
|
Note 2: Segment revenue for the three months ended June 30, 2008 does not include inter segment revenues from Formulations to PSAI which
is accounted for at cost of Rs.4,437 (as compared to
Rs.0 for the three months ended June 30, 2007).
28
DR. REDDYS LABORATORIES LIMITED AND SUBSIDIARIES
UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED INTERIM FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(in thousands, except share and per share data)
a. Acquisition of a unit of The Dow Chemical Company
On April 28, 2008, the Company, through its wholly owned subsidiary Dr. Reddys Laboratories
(EU) Limited (DRL EU), acquired a unit of The Dow Chemical Company associated with its United
Kingdom sites in Mirfield and Cambridge for a total cash consideration of Rs.1,301,899
(U.S.$32,137). The acquisition includes customer contracts, associated products, process
technology, intellectual property, trademarks and the Dowpharma Small Molecules facilities located
in Mirfield and Cambridge, United Kingdom. The Company also took over the existing work force as a
part of the acquisition. The acquisition complements technology and experience synergies to the
Companys existing custom pharmaceutical business and gives access to a research and development team.
The Company has accounted for the acquisition under the purchase method in accordance with IFRS No.
3, Business Combinations. Accordingly, the financial results of the aforesaid acquired business
for the period from April 29, 2008 to June 30, 2008 have been included in the unaudited condensed
consolidated interim financial statements of the Company.
The following table summarizes the estimated fair values of the assets acquired and liabilities
assumed at the date of acquisition:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recognized values on |
|
Particulars |
|
acquisition |
|
|
Property, plant and equipment |
|
Rs. |
740,704 |
|
Intangible assets |
|
|
800,883 |
|
Inventories |
|
|
230,707 |
|
Non-current assets |
|
|
45,923 |
|
Non-current liabilities |
|
|
(115,565 |
) |
Deferred tax liabilities, net |
|
|
(250,350 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Net identifiable assets and liabilities |
|
Rs. |
1,452,302 |
|
Negative goodwill on acquisition recognized
in income statement |
|
|
(150,403 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Consideration paid in cash* |
|
Rs. |
1,301,899 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
|
Total consideration paid includes direct attributable costs of Rs.12,537 (U.S.$309). |
As the acquisition involved a combination of a purchase of a unit of an existing entity and a
purchase of certain identifiable assets, the carrying value of assets and liabilities before
acquisition could not be determined in accordance with IFRS.
The estimated useful lives of intangibles acquired are as follows:
|
|
|
Customer related intangibles
|
|
4-11 years |
Product related intangibles
|
|
6-13 years |
The negative goodwill on acquisition is attributable mainly to lower amounts paid towards inventories
and intangible assets in the acquired business. The acquired business contributed revenues of
Rs.157,531 and, including negative goodwill, a profit of Rs.58,706 for the period
from April 29, 2008 to June 30, 2008.
29
DR. REDDYS LABORATORIES LIMITED AND SUBSIDIARIES
UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED INTERIM FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(in thousands, except share and per share data)
6. |
|
Business combinations (continued) |
b. Acquisition of BASF Corporations manufacturing facility in Shreveport, Louisiana, USA and
related pharmaceutical contract manufacturing business.
On April 30, 2008, the Company acquired BASF Corporations pharmaceutical contract manufacturing
business and its manufacturing facility in Shreveport, Louisiana, U.S.A. for a total cash
consideration of Rs.1,639,276 (U.S.$40,466). The business involves contract manufacturing of
generic prescription and over the counter products for branded and generic companies in the United
States. This acquired business includes customer contracts, related ANDAs and NDAs, and trademarks,
as well as the Shreveport manufacturing facility. The Company also took over the existing work
force as a part of the acquisition.
The Company has accounted for the acquisition under the purchase method in accordance with IFRS No.
3, Business Combinations. Accordingly, the financial results of the aforesaid acquired business
for the period from May 1, 2008 through June 30, 2008 have been included in the unaudited condensed
consolidated interim financial statements of the Company.
The following table summarizes the estimated fair values of the assets acquired and liabilities
assumed at the date of acquisition.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recognized values |
|
Particulars |
|
on acquisition |
|
|
Property, plant and equipment |
|
Rs. |
755,607 |
|
Intangible assets |
|
|
482,068 |
|
Inventories |
|
|
248,198 |
|
|
|
|
|
Net identifiable assets and liabilities |
|
Rs. |
1,485,873 |
|
Goodwill on acquisition |
|
|
153,403 |
|
|
|
|
|
Consideration paid, satisfied in cash* |
|
Rs. |
1,639,276 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
|
Total consideration paid includes direct attributable costs of Rs.30, 858 (U.S.$762). |
As the acquisition involved purchase of a unit of an existing entity with certain identifiable
assets and liabilities, the carrying value of assets and liabilities before acquisition could not
be determined in accordance with IFRS.
The estimated useful lives of intangibles acquired are as follows:
|
|
|
Customer related intangibles
|
|
4 - 9 years |
Product related intangibles
|
|
9-10 years |
Goodwill amounts to Rs.153,403 and is attributable mainly to the employee workforce acquired and
the estimated values to be derived from the synergies for the Company due to cost savings. The
acquired business contributed revenues of Rs.313,641 and net profit of Rs.2,434 for the period from
May 1, 2008 to June 30, 2008.
c. Acquisition of Jet Generici SRL
On April 30, 2008, the Company acquired Jet Generici Srl, a company engaged in the sale of generic
finished dosages in Italy for a total cash consideration of Rs.147,887 (Euro 2.34 million). The
transaction was accounted as an acquisition of business under the purchase method in accordance
with IFRS 3. The transaction resulted in the Company gaining an entry in the Italian market and
resulted in goodwill of
Rs.162,356.
d. Pro-forma information
If the
above acquisitions had taken effect at the beginning of the reporting
period (i.e., April 1, 2007), the revenue, profit before tax and profit after tax of the Company for the
applicable periods on a pro-forma basis would have been as below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended |
|
|
June 30, 2008 |
|
June 30, 2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue |
|
Rs. |
15,182,309 |
|
|
Rs. |
12,712,666 |
|
Profit before tax |
|
|
1,127,154 |
|
|
|
1,998,117 |
|
Profit after tax |
|
|
1,072,964 |
|
|
|
1,644,951 |
|
|
30
DR. REDDYS LABORATORIES LIMITED AND SUBSIDIARIES
UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED INTERIM FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(in thousands, except share and per share data)
7. Financial instruments
Hedging of fluctuations in foreign currency
The
Company is exposed to exchange rate risk which arises from its foreign exchange revenues,
primarily in U.S. dollars, British Pounds and Euros, and foreign currency debt in U.S. dollars and
Euros.
The Company uses forward exchange contracts and option contracts(derivatives) to mitigate its risk
of changes in foreign currency exchange rates. Most of the forward exchange contracts and option
contracts have maturities of less than one year after the balance sheet date. Where necessary, the
forward exchange contracts are rolled over at maturity.
Forecasted transactions
The Company classifies its option contracts hedging forecasted transactions as cash flow hedges and
measures them at fair value. The fair value of option contracts used as hedges of forecasted
transactions at June 30, 2008 was a liability of Rs.738,834 (as compared to a liability of
Rs.10,064 at March 31, 2008), that were recognized as derivatives measured at fair value.
Recognized assets and liabilities
Changes in the fair value of forward exchange contracts that economically hedge monetary assets and
liabilities in foreign currencies and for which no hedge accounting is applied are recognized in
profit or loss. Both the changes in fair value of the forward contracts and the foreign exchange
gains and losses relating to the monetary items are recognized as part of net financing costs.
The fair value of forward exchange contracts and option contracts used as economic hedges of
monetary assets and liabilities in foreign currencies recognized in fair value derivatives was an
asset of Rs.38,884 at June 30, 2008 (as compared to a liability of Rs.85,982 at March 31, 2008).
Fair values
The carrying amount and fair value of financial instruments as at June 30, 2008 is a net liability
of Rs.16,436,830 (as compared to a net liability of Rs.10,647,534 at March 31, 2008).
Current tax
Current tax expense for the interim periods is calculated based on the estimated average annual
income tax applied on the pre tax income of the interim period.
Current tax for current and prior periods is classified as current liability to the extent that it
is unpaid. Amounts paid in excess of amounts owed are classified as a current asset.
Deferred tax
The amount of deferred tax provided is based on the expected movements of realization or settlement
of the carrying amount of assets and liabilities, using the effective tax rate of the interim
periods presented.
The
primary components of the Companys recognized deferred tax asset includes temporary differences
related to expenses deferred for the tax purposes, operating and capital losses carried forward,
provisions, impairment loss on receivables, impairment loss on investment and minimum alternate tax
carry forward. The primary components of the Companys deferred tax liabilities include temporary
differences related to property, plant, equipment and intangible assets. Deferred tax expenses or
benefits arise from the origination and reversal of temporary differences, the effect of change in
tax rates and the benefit of tax losses recognized.
Current tax expense and deferred tax benefit recognized in the income statement for the three
months ended June 30, 2008 is Rs.408,935 and Rs.325,089, respectively. For the three months ended
June 30, 2007, there is a current tax expense of Rs.27,252 and a deferred tax expense of
Rs.294,463, respectively. Total deferred tax benefit recognized directly in the equity was
Rs.116,678 for the three months ended June 30, 2008. For the three months ended June 30, 2007 there
was a deferred tax expense of Rs.9,122.
31
DR. REDDYS LABORATORIES LIMITED AND SUBSIDIARIES
UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED INTERIM FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(in thousands, except share and per share data)
8. Income taxes (continued)
Reconciliation of effective tax rate
The reported income tax expense for the three months ended June 30, 2008 was calculated based
on an estimated average annual income tax rate of 7.02%. For the three months ended June 30, 2007,
the reported income tax expense was calculated based on an estimated average annual income tax
rate of 16.77%. The difference between the estimated average annual effective income tax rate and
the enacted tax rate is accounted for by a number of factors, including the effect of differences
between Indian and foreign tax rates, expenses not deductible for tax purposes, income exempted
from income taxes, effects of changes in tax laws and rates, and the effects of minimum
alternate taxes.
9. |
|
Property, plant and equipment |
Acquisitions and disposals
During the three months ended June 30, 2008,
the Company acquired assets at an aggregate cost of
Rs.2,838,655 (as compared to a cost of Rs.6,231,125 for the year ended March 31, 2008), including
assets acquired through business combinations of Rs.1,496,374 (no assets were acquired through
business combinations for the year ended March 31, 2008).
Assets with a net book value of Rs.4,850 were
disposed of during the three months ended June 30, 2008 (as compared to Rs.62,661 in assets
disposed of for the year ended March 31, 2008), resulting in a gain on disposal of Rs.2,847 (as
compared to a loss of Rs.7,629 for the year ended March 31, 2008). Depreciation expense for the
three months ended June 30, 2008 was Rs.556,256 (as compared to Rs.393,154 for the three months
ended June 30, 2007).
Capital Commitments
As of March 31, 2008 and June 30, 2008, the Company was committed to spend approximately
Rs.1,552,426 and Rs.1,069,525, respectively, under agreements to purchase property, plant and
equipment. This amount is net of capital advances paid in respect of such purchases.
10. Goodwill
Goodwill arising upon acquisitions is not amortized but tested for impairment annually or more
frequently if there are certain internal or external indicators.
The following table presents the changes in goodwill during the three months ended June 30, 2008
and the year ended March 31, 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended |
|
|
Year ended |
|
|
|
June 30, 2008 |
|
|
March 31, 2008 |
|
|
Opening balance (1) |
|
Rs. |
17,179,231 |
|
|
Rs. |
15,947,898 |
|
Goodwill arising upon purchase business combination |
|
|
315,759 |
|
|
|
|
|
Impairment of goodwill (2) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(90,437 |
) |
Effect of translation adjustments |
|
|
1,128,424 |
|
|
|
1,321,770 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Closing balance (1) |
|
Rs. |
18,623,414 |
|
|
Rs. |
17,179,231 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Includes goodwill arising upon investment in affiliate of Rs.181,943. |
|
(2) |
|
The impairment of goodwill of Rs.90,437 relates to the Companys proprietary products segment. |
32
DR. REDDYS LABORATORIES LIMITED AND SUBSIDIARIES
UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED INTERIM FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(in thousands, except share and per share data)
11. Other intangible assets
Acquisitions and write-down of intangibles
During the three months
ended June 30, 2008, the Company acquired other intangible assets at an
aggregate cost of Rs.1,413,723 (as compared to a cost of Rs.211,377 for the year ended March 31,
2008), including assets acquired through business combinations of Rs.1,312,303 (no assets were
acquired through business combinations for the year ended March 31, 2008). Amortization
expenses for the three months ended June 30, 2008 was Rs.376,633 (as compared to amortization
expenses of Rs.346,638 for the three months ended June 30, 2007).
During the year ended March 31, 2008, the Company tested the carrying value of betapharm related
intangibles for impairment. This testing was triggered by certain adverse market conditions, such
as decreases in market prices and an increasing trend in certain new type of rebates being
negotiated with State Healthcare Insurance Fund (SHI) companies, and certain supply constraints.
As a result of this review, the Company recorded a write-down of intangible assets of Rs.2,883,005
and adjusted the net carrying value of certain product related intangibles as of March 31, 2008.
Furthermore, during the year ended March 31, 2008, the Company also tested the carrying value of
Litaphar related intangibles for impairment. This testing was triggered by certain adverse market
conditions, such as decreases in sales and increases in costs of procurement. The fair values of
these intangibles were determined based on discounted cash flow approach. As a result of this
review, the Company recorded a write-down of intangible assets of Rs.127,506 and adjusted the
net carrying value of product related intangibles as of March 31, 2008.
12. Inventories
Inventories consist of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of |
|
|
|
June 30, 2008 |
|
|
March 31, 2008 |
|
|
Raw materials |
|
Rs. |
3,995,671 |
|
|
Rs. |
3,226,016 |
|
Packing material, stores and spares |
|
|
899,508 |
|
|
|
773,433 |
|
Work-in-process |
|
|
2,545,983 |
|
|
|
2,345,849 |
|
Finished goods |
|
|
5,601,684 |
|
|
|
4,787,532 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rs. |
13,042,846 |
|
|
Rs. |
11,132,830 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
During the three months ended
June 30, 2008 and June 30, 2007, the Company
recorded an inventory write-down of Rs.37,120, and Rs.97,610 respectively, resulting from a decline
in the net realizable value of certain finished goods and write down of certain raw materials. These
amounts are included in the cost of revenues.
13. Cash and cash equivalents
Cash and cash equivalents consist of:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of |
|
|
|
June 30, 2008 |
|
|
March 31, 2008 |
|
|
Cash balances |
|
Rs. |
159,088 |
|
|
Rs. |
162,771 |
|
Balances with banks |
|
|
3,564,841 |
|
|
|
7,258,670 |
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents on the balance sheet |
|
|
3,723,929 |
|
|
|
7,421,441 |
|
Bank overdrafts used for cash management purposes |
|
|
(895,802 |
) |
|
|
(434,928 |
) |
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents on the cash flow statement |
|
Rs. |
2,828,127 |
|
|
Rs. |
6,986,513 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
33
DR. REDDYS LABORATORIES LIMITED AND SUBSIDIARIES
UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED INTERIM FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(in thousands, except share and per share data)
14. Other expense/(income), net
Other expense/(income), net consists of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended |
|
|
June 30, 2008 |
|
|
June 30, 2007 |
|
|
Profit on sale of property, plant and equipment |
|
Rs. |
(2,847 |
) |
|
Rs. |
807 |
|
Sale of spent chemical |
|
|
(60,389 |
) |
|
|
(27,936 |
) |
Negative goodwill on acquisitions of business |
|
|
(150,403 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Miscellaneous income |
|
|
(60,684 |
) |
|
|
(57,927 |
) |
Provision
for expected claim from innovator (see Note 21) |
|
|
514,873 |
|
|
|
|
|
Other expenses |
|
|
554 |
|
|
|
2,375 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rs. |
241,104 |
|
|
Rs. |
(82,681 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15. Finance income, net
Finance income, net consists of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended |
|
|
June 30, 2008 |
|
|
June 30, 2007 |
|
Interest income |
|
Rs. |
69,425 |
|
|
Rs. |
261,357 |
|
Foreign exchange gain |
|
|
175,792 |
|
|
|
299,364 |
|
Profit on sale of investments |
|
|
74,796 |
|
|
|
15,951 |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
(242,983 |
) |
|
|
(418,263 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rs. |
77,030 |
|
|
Rs. |
158,409 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16. Earnings per share
Basic earnings per share
The calculation of basic earnings per share for the three month period ended June 30, 2008 was
based on the profit attributable to equity shareholders of Rs.1,111,293 (as compared to a profit of
Rs.1,599,665 for the three months ended June 30, 2007) and a weighted average number of equity
shares outstanding during the three months ended June 30, 2008 and three months ended June 30, 2007
calculated as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended June 30, |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
Issued
equity shares as of April 1 |
|
|
168,172,746 |
|
|
|
167,912,180 |
|
Effect of shares issued on exercise of stock options |
|
|
36,105 |
|
|
|
15,129 |
|
Weighted average number of equity shares at June 30 |
|
|
168,208,851 |
|
|
|
167,927,309 |
|
|
Diluted earnings per share
The calculations of diluted earnings per share for the three months ended June 30, 2008 was based
on the profit attributable for equity shareholders of Rs.1,111,293 (as compared to a profit of
Rs.1,599,665 for the three months ended June 30, 2007) and weighted average number of equity shares
outstanding during three months ended June 30, 2008 and three months ended June 30, 2007 calculated
as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended June 30, |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average number of equity shares at June 30 (Basic) |
|
|
168,208,851 |
|
|
|
167,927,309 |
|
Effect of stock options outstanding |
|
|
679,355 |
|
|
|
800,332 |
|
Weighted average number of equity shares at June 30 (Diluted) |
|
|
168,888,206 |
|
|
|
168,727,641 |
|
|
34
DR. REDDYS LABORATORIES LIMITED AND SUBSIDIARIES
UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED INTERIM FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(in thousands, except share and per share data)
17. Employee stock incentive plans
Dr. Reddys Employees Stock Option Plan-2002 (the DRL 2002 Plan):
The Company instituted the DRL 2002 Plan for all eligible employees pursuant to the special
resolution approved by the shareholders in the Annual General Meeting held on September 24, 2001.
The DRL 2002 Plan covers all employees of DRL and its subsidiaries and directors (excluding
promoter directors) of DRL and its subsidiaries (collectively, eligible employees). The
compensation committee of the Board of DRL (the Compensation Committee) administers the DRL 2002 Plan
and grants stock options to eligible employees. The Compensation Committee determines which
eligible employees will receive options, the number of options to be granted, the exercise price,
the vesting period and the exercise period. The vesting period is determined for all options
issued on the date of grant. The options issued under the DRL 2002 Plan vest in periods ranging
between one and four years, and generally have a maximum contractual term of five years.
The DRL 2002 Plan was amended on July 28, 2004 at the annual general meeting of shareholders to
provide for stock option grants in two categories:
Category A: 1,721,700 stock options out of the total of 2,295,478 options reserved for
grant having an exercise price equal to the fair market value of the underlying equity shares on
the date of grant; and
Category B: 573,778 stock options out of the total of 2,295,478 options reserved for grant
having an exercise price equal to the par value of the underlying equity shares (i.e., Rs.5 per
option).
The DRL 2002 Plan was further amended on July 27, 2005 at the annual general meeting of
shareholders to provide for stock option grants in two categories:
Category A: 300,000 stock options out of the total of 2,295,478 options reserved for grant
having an exercise price equal to the fair market value of the underlying equity shares on the date
of grant; and
Category B: 1,995,478 stock options out of the total of 2,295,478 options reserved for
grant having an exercise price equal to the par value of the underlying equity shares (i.e., Rs.5
per option).
Under the DRL 2002 Plan, the exercise price of the fair market value options granted under Category
A above is determined based on the average closing price for 30 days prior to the grant in the
stock exchange where there is highest trading volume during that period. Notwithstanding the
foregoing, the Compensation Committee may, after obtaining the approval of the shareholders in the
annual general meeting, grant options with a per share exercise price other than fair market value
and par value of the equity shares.
After the stock split effected in the form of stock dividend issued by the Company in August 2006,
the DRL 2002 Plan provides for stock options granted in the above two categories as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of |
|
Number of |
|
|
|
|
Options granted |
|
Options granted |
|
|
Particulars |
|
Under category
A |
|
Under category
B |
|
Total |
Options reserved under original Plan |
|
|
300,000 |
|
|
|
1,995,478 |
|
|
|
2,295,478 |
|
Options exercised prior to stock dividend date (A) |
|
|
94,061 |
|
|
|
147,793 |
|
|
|
241,854 |
|
Balance of shares that can be allotted exercise
of options (B) |
|
|
205,939 |
|
|
|
1,847,685 |
|
|
|
2,053,624 |
|
Options arising from stock dividend (C) |
|
|
205,939 |
|
|
|
1,847,685 |
|
|
|
2,053,624 |
|
Options reserved after stock dividend (A+B+C) |
|
|
505,939 |
|
|
|
3,843,163 |
|
|
|
4,349,102 |
|
In April 2007, certain employees surrendered their category B par value options under the DRL 2002
Plan in exchange for new category B par value options under the DRL 2007 Plan (discussed below).
The incremental cost due to such modifications was insignificant.
The Compensation Committee at its meeting held in October 2007, proposed that the Company should
absorb the full liability of the Fringe Benefit Tax upon exercise of all stock options granted on
or prior to the date of its resolution. In respect of new grants to be made by the Company
subsequent to the date of such resolution, the Fringe Benefit Tax will be recovered from employees
upon the exercise of their stock options. The above amendment was approved by the shareholders at
the Annual General Meeting held in July 2008.
35
DR. REDDYS LABORATORIES LIMITED AND SUBSIDIARIES
UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED INTERIM FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(in thousands, except share and per share data)
17.
Employee stock incentive plans (continued)
Dr. Reddys Employees ADR Stock Option Plan-2007 (the DRL 2007 Plan):
The Company instituted the DRL 2007 Plan for all eligible employees in pursuance of the special
resolution approved by the shareholders in the Annual General Meeting held on July 27, 2005. The
DRL 2007 Plan became effective upon its approval by
the Board of Directors on January 22, 2007. The DRL 2007 Plan covers all employees of DRL and its
subsidiaries and directors (excluding promoter directors) of DRL and its subsidiaries
(collectively, eligible employees). The Compensation Committee administers the DRL 2007 Plan and
grants stock options to eligible employees. The Compensation Committee determines which eligible
employees will receive options, the number of options to be granted, the exercise price, the
vesting period and the exercise period. The vesting period is determined for all options issued on
the date of grant. The options issued under DRL 2007 plan vest in periods ranging between one and
four years, and generally have a maximum contractual term of five years.
The DRL 2007 Plan provides for stock option grants in two categories:
Category A: 382,695 stock options out of the total of 1,530,779 stock options reserved for grant
having an exercise price equal to the fair market value of the underlying equity shares on the date
of grant; and
Category B: 1,148,084 stock options out of the total of 1,530,779 stock options reserved for grant
having an exercise price equal to the par value of the underlying equity shares (i.e., Rs.5 per
option).
The Compensation Committee at its meeting held in October 2007, proposed that the Company should
absorb the full liability of the Fringe Benefit Tax upon exercise of all stock options granted on
or prior to the date of its resolution. In respect of new grants to be made by the Company
subsequent to the date of its resolution, the Fringe Benefit Tax will be recovered from employees
upon the exercise of their stock options. The above amendment was approved by the shareholders at
the Annual General Meeting held in July 2008.
Aurigene Discovery Technologies Ltd. Employee Stock Option Plan 2003 (the Aurigene ESOP Plan):
Aurigene Discovery Technologies Limited (Aurigene), a consolidated subsidiary, adopted the
Aurigene ESOP Plan to provide for issuance of stock options to employees of Aurigene and its
subsidiary, Aurigene Discovery Technologies Inc., who have completed one full year of service with
Aurigene and its subsidiary. Aurigene has reserved 4,550,000 of its ordinary shares for issuance
under this plan. Under the Aurigene ESOP Plan, stock options may be granted at an exercise price as
determined by Aurigenes compensation committee. The options issued under Aurigene ESOP Plan vest
in periods ranging from one to three years, including certain options which vest immediately on
grant, and generally have a maximum contractual term of three years.
During the year ended March 31, 2008, the Aurigene ESOP Plan was amended to increase the total
number of options reserved for issuance to 7,500,000 and to provide for Aurigenes recovery of
Fringe Benefit Taxes from employees upon the exercise of their stock options.
Aurigene Discovery Technologies Ltd. Management Group Stock Grant Plan (the Aurigene Management
Plan):
In the year ended March 31, 2004, Aurigene adopted the Aurigene Management Plan to provide for
issuance of stock options to management employees of Aurigene and its subsidiary Aurigene Discovery
Technologies Inc. Aurigene has reserved 2,950,000 of its ordinary shares for issuance under this
plan. Under the Aurigene Management Plan, stock options may be granted at an exercise price as
determined by Aurigenes compensation committee. As of June 30, 2008, there were no stock options
outstanding under the Aurigene Management Plan. The plan was closed by a resolution of the
shareholders in January 2008.
Stock options granted during the period:
The terms and conditions of the grants made during the three months ended June 30, 2008 under the
above plans are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of |
|
Exercise |
|
Vesting |
|
Contractual |
|
|
instruments |
|
price |
|
period |
|
life |
|
DRL
2002 Plan: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- Category A |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- Category B |
|
|
350,820 |
|
|
Rs. |
5.00 |
|
|
|
1 to 4 |
years |
|
5 |
years |
DRL
2007 Plan: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- Category A |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- Category B |
|
|
74,400 |
|
|
Rs. |
5.00 |
|
|
|
1 to 4 |
years |
|
5 |
years |
Aurigene ESOP
Plan |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
36
DR. REDDYS LABORATORIES LIMITED AND SUBSIDIARIES
UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED INTERIM FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(in thousands, except share and per share data)
17.
Employee stock incentive plans (continued)
The terms and conditions of the grants made during the three months ended June 30, 2007 under the
above plans are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of |
|
Exercise |
|
Vesting |
|
Contractual |
|
|
instruments |
|
price |
|
Period |
|
life |
|
DRL
2002 Plan: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- Category A |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- Category B |
|
|
386,060 |
|
|
Rs. |
5.00 |
|
|
|
1 to 4 |
years |
|
5 |
years |
DRL
2007 Plan: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- Category A |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- Category B |
|
|
206,818 |
|
|
Rs. |
5.00 |
|
|
|
1 to 4 |
years |
|
5 |
years |
Aurigene
ESOP Plan |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Black-Scholes model inputs used in computing the fair value of the grants made during the three months ended June 30, 2008 and June 30, 2007
are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2008 |
|
|
June 30, 2007 |
|
|
Volatility |
|
|
28.79% - 30.07 |
% |
|
|
28.40% - 32.70 |
% |
Exercise price |
|
|
Rs. 5.00 |
|
|
|
Rs. 5.00 |
|
Expected term |
|
|
1 to 4 |
years |
|
|
1 to 4 |
years |
Discount rate Bond equivalent yield rate |
|
|
7.76%- 7.94 |
% |
|
|
7.80% - 8.20 |
% |
Dividend yield rate |
|
|
0.59 |
% |
|
|
0.75 |
% |
|
The fair values of services received in return for share options granted to employees are measured
by reference to the fair value of share options granted. The estimate of the fair value of the
services received is measured based on the Black-Scholes model.
For the three months ended June 30, 2008 and June 30, 2007 Rs.34,022 and Rs.44,074, respectively,
has been recorded as total employee share based expense under all the employee stock incentive
plans. As of June 30, 2008, there is approximately Rs.418,634 of total unrecognized compensation
cost related to unvested stock options. This cost is expected to be recognized over a
weighted-average period of 3.36 years.
18. Employee benefit plans
Gratuity benefits
In accordance with applicable Indian laws, the Company provides for gratuity, a defined benefit
retirement plan (the Gratuity Plan) covering certain categories of employees. The Gratuity Plan
provides a lump sum payment to vested employees at retirement or termination of employment. The
amount of payment is based on the respective employees last drawn salary and the years of
employment with the Company. Effective September 1, 1999, the Company established the Dr. Reddys
Laboratories Gratuity Fund (the Gratuity Fund). Liabilities in respect of the Gratuity Plan are
determined by an actuarial valuation, based upon which the Company makes contributions to the
Gratuity Fund. Trustees administer the contributions made to the Gratuity Fund. Amounts
contributed to the Gratuity Fund are invested in specific securities as mandated by law and
generally consist of federal and state government bonds and debt instruments of government-owned
corporations.
The components of net periodic benefit cost for the three months ended June 30, 2007 and
June 30, 2008 are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended June 30, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
Service cost |
|
Rs. |
10,662 |
|
|
Rs. |
8,695 |
|
Interest cost |
|
|
6,708 |
|
|
|
5,551 |
|
Expected return on plan assets |
|
|
(5,309 |
) |
|
|
(4,223 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net amount recognized |
|
Rs. |
12,061 |
|
|
Rs. |
10,023 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
37
DR. REDDYS LABORATORIES LIMITED AND SUBSIDIARIES
UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED INTERIM FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(in thousands, except share and per share data)
18.
Employee benefit plans (continued)
Details of total employee benefits obligation outstanding are provided below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As at |
|
|
June 30, 2008 |
|
|
March 31, 2008 |
|
|
Present value of unfunded obligations |
|
Rs. |
3,479 |
|
|
Rs. |
3,074 |
|
Present value of funded obligations |
|
|
329,826 |
|
|
|
319,267 |
|
Fair value of plan assets |
|
|
(288,699 |
) |
|
|
(289,076 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Present value of net obligations |
|
|
44,606 |
|
|
|
33,265 |
|
Unrecognized actuarial gains and losses |
|
|
(22,061 |
) |
|
|
(22,781 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total employee benefits obligation outstanding |
|
Rs. |
22,545 |
|
|
Rs. |
10,484 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pension plan
All
employees of Industrias Quimicas Falcon de Mexico S.A. de C.V. (Falcon) are entitled to a pension plan in
the form of a Defined Benefit Plan. The pension plan provides a payment to vested employees at
retirement or termination of employment. This payment is based upon the employees integrated salary
and is paid in the form of a monthly pension over a period of 20 years computed based upon a
predefined formula. Liabilities in respect of the pension plan are determined by an actuarial
valuation, based upon which the Company makes contributions to the pension plan fund. This fund is
administered by a third party who is provided guidance by a technical committee formed by senior
employees of Falcon.
The components of net periodic benefit cost for the three months ended June 30, 2007 and
June 30, 2008 are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended June 30, |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
Service cost |
|
Rs. |
3,700 |
|
|
Rs. |
3,794 |
|
Interest cost |
|
|
5,316 |
|
|
|
5,108 |
|
Expected return on plan assets |
|
|
(4,339 |
) |
|
|
(5,332 |
) |
Amortization of net transition obligation/(asset) |
|
|
895 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net amount recognized |
|
Rs. |
5,572 |
|
|
Rs. |
3,570 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Details
of the total employee benefits assets outstanding are provided below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As at |
|
|
June 30, 2008 |
|
|
March 31, 2008 |
|
|
Present value of unfunded obligations |
|
Rs. |
55,648 |
|
|
Rs. |
50,099 |
|
Present value of funded obligations |
|
|
225,940 |
|
|
|
202,597 |
|
Fair value of plan assets |
|
|
(233,303 |
) |
|
|
(212,838 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Present value of net obligations |
|
|
48,285 |
|
|
|
39,858 |
|
Unrecognized actuarial gains and losses |
|
|
(66,211 |
) |
|
|
(61,040 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
employee benefits assets outstanding |
|
Rs. |
(17,926 |
) |
|
Rs. |
(21,182 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19. Loans and borrowings
Short term loans and borrowings
The Company had lines of credit of Rs.17,659,000 as of June 30, 2008 and March 31, 2008 from its
bankers for working capital requirements. These lines of credit are renewable annually. The
Company has the right to draw upon these lines of credit based on its requirements.
38
DR. REDDYS LABORATORIES LIMITED AND SUBSIDIARIES
UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED INTERIM FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(in thousands, except share and per share data)
19.
Loans and borrowings (continued)
An interest rate profile of borrowings from banks is given below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As at |
|
|
June 30, 2008 |
|
|
March 31, 2008 |
|
Rupee borrowings |
|
|
9 |
% |
|
|
9 |
% |
Foreign currency borrowings |
|
Libor + 110 |
bps |
|
Libor + 50-100 |
bps |
|
Long term loans and borrowings
Long term loans and borrowings consist of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As at |
|
|
June 30, 2008 |
|
|
March 31, 2008 |
|
Rupee term loan |
|
Rs. |
11,825 |
|
|
Rs. |
13,305 |
|
Foreign currency loan |
|
|
14,753,710 |
|
|
|
14,183,927 |
|
Obligation under capital lease |
|
|
309,561 |
|
|
|
291,322 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,075,096 |
|
|
|
14,488,554 |
|
Less: Current portion
Rupee term loan |
|
|
5,920 |
|
|
|
5,920 |
|
Foreign currency loan |
|
|
2,220,989 |
|
|
|
1,772,990 |
|
Obligation under capital lease |
|
|
13,790 |
|
|
|
12,094 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,240,699 |
|
|
|
1,791,004 |
|
|
|
|
Non current portion |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rupee term loan |
|
|
5,905 |
|
|
|
7,385 |
|
Foreign currency loan |
|
|
12,532,721 |
|
|
|
12,410,937 |
|
Foreign currency loan |
|
|
295,771 |
|
|
|
279,228 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rs. |
12,834,397 |
|
|
Rs. |
12,697,550 |
|
|
|
|
During the three month period ended June 30, 2008, the Company repaid Rs.475,122 of foreign
currency loans (consisting of Euro 6.84 million and U.S.$0.38 million), Rs.1,480 of rupee term
loans and Rs.1,382 of obligations under capital leases. During the year ended March 31, 2008, the
Company repaid Rs.7,733,301 of foreign currency loans (consisting of Euro 139.49 million and
U.S.$0.51 million) and Rs.5,920 of rupee term loans, and assumed net obligations of Rs.20,715 under
capital leases.
An interest rate profile of long-term debt is given below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As
at |
|
|
June 30, 2008 |
|
March 31, 2008 |
|
Rupee borrowings
|
|
|
|
2.0% |
|
|
|
2.0% |
Foreign currency borrowings
|
|
EURIBOR +
70 bps and
LIBOR + 70 bps
|
|
EURIBOR +
70 - 200bps
and
LIBOR + 70 bps
|
The fair value of the foreign currency loans and the capital lease obligations approximate their
carrying values as of June 30, 2008 and March 31, 2008, respectively.
20. Related parties
The Company has entered into transactions with the following related parties:
|
|
Diana Hotels Limited for availing hotel services; |
|
|
|
A.R. Life Sciences Private Limited for availing processing services of raw materials and
intermediates; |
39
DR. REDDYS LABORATORIES LIMITED AND SUBSIDIARIES
UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED INTERIM FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(in thousands, except share and per share data)
20.
Related parties (continued)
|
|
Dr. Reddys Holdings Private Limited for the purchase and sale of active pharmaceutical
ingredients; |
|
|
|
Institute of Life Science towards contributions for social development; |
|
|
|
Dr. Reddys Foundation for Human and Social Development towards contributions for social
development; |
|
|
|
K.K. Enterprises for availing packaging services for formulation products; and |
|
|
|
SR Enterprises for transportation services. |
These are
enterprises over which principal shareholders or key managerial personnel have
control or significant influence (significant interest entities).
The
Company has also entered into transactions with its associate Perlecan Pharma Private Limited
and its joint venture Kunshan Rotam Reddy Pharmaceuticals Co. Limited (KRRP). These transactions
are in the nature of reimbursement of research and development expenses incurred by the Company on
behalf of Perlecan Pharma Private Limited, revenue from research services performed by the Company
for Perlecan Pharma Private Limited and purchase of active pharmaceutical ingredients by the
Company from KRRP.
The Company has also entered into cancellable operating lease transactions with directors and their
relatives
The following is a summary of significant related party transactions:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended June 30, |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
Purchases from significant interest entities |
|
|
48,472 |
|
|
|
62,024 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales to significant interest entities |
|
|
31,039 |
|
|
|
11,967 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contribution to a significant interest entity towards social development |
|
|
25,000 |
|
|
|
6,300 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue from associates |
|
|
|
|
|
|
19,699 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reimbursement of research and development expenses from associates |
|
|
|
|
|
|
30,731 |
|
Lease rental paid under cancellable operating leases to key managerial
personnel and their relatives |
|
|
4,634 |
|
|
|
3,658 |
|
Hotel expenses paid |
|
|
2,072 |
|
|
|
2,409 |
|
The following table describes the components of managerial remuneration:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the period ended June 30, |
|
Particulars |
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Salaries |
|
Rs. |
3,150 |
|
|
Rs. |
3,050 |
|
Commission * |
|
|
65,280 |
|
|
|
41,472 |
|
Other Perquisites |
|
|
470 |
|
|
|
435 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
Rs. |
68,900 |
|
|
Rs. |
44,957 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
|
Accrued based on profit as of June 30, 2008 and June 30, 2007 in accordance with the terms of
employment. |
The Company has the following amounts due from related parties:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As at |
|
|
June 30, 2008 |
|
|
March 31, 2008 |
|
Significant interest entities |
|
Rs. |
34,355 |
|
|
Rs. |
26,396 |
|
Associates |
|
|
26,964 |
|
|
|
26,964 |
|
Directors and relatives |
|
|
4,280 |
|
|
|
4,280 |
|
|
40
DR. REDDYS LABORATORIES LIMITED AND SUBSIDIARIES
UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED INTERIM FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(in thousands, except share and per share data)
20.
Related parties (continued)
The Company has the following amounts due to related parties:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As at |
|
|
June 30, 2008 |
|
|
March 31, 2008 |
|
Significant interest entities |
|
Rs. |
29,483 |
|
|
Rs. |
16,750 |
|
|
The above table as at June 30, 2008 and March 31, 2008 does not include an amount of Rs.680,000
paid as advance towards purchase of land from a significant interest entity, which has been
disclosed under capital work-in-progress.
21. Contingencies
Guarantees
The Companys equity accounted investee, KRRP, secured a credit facility of Rs.27 million from
Agricultural Bank of China (Agricultural Bank). During the year ended March 31, 2008, the Company
had issued a corporate guarantee of Rs.27 million in favor of Agricultural Bank to enhance the
credit standing of KRRP. The guarantee is required to be renewed every year and the Companys
liability may arise in the event of non-payment by KRRP of the amount withdrawn under its credit
facility.
Litigations, etc.
The Company is involved in disputes, lawsuits, claims, governmental and/or regulatory inspections,
inquiries, investigations and proceedings, including patent and commercial matters that arise from
time to time in the ordinary course of business. The more significant matters are discussed below.
Most of the claims involve complex issues. Often, these issues are subject to uncertainties and
therefore the probability of a loss, if any, being sustained and an estimate of the amount of any
loss are difficult to ascertain. Consequently, for a majority of these claims, it is not possible
to make a reasonable estimate of the expected financial effect, if any, that will result from
ultimate resolution of the proceedings. In these cases, the Company discloses information with
respect to the nature and facts of the case.
With respect to each of the legal proceedings described below, other than those which have been
disposed of, we are unable to make estimates of the possible loss or range of possible losses at
this stage, other than those where we have provided for the liability. We also do not believe that
disclosure of the amount sought by plaintiffs, if that is known, would be meaningful with respect
to those legal proceedings. This is due to a number of factors including: the stage of the
proceedings (in many cases trial dates have not been set) and the overall length and extent of
pre-trial discovery; the entitlement of the parties to an action to appeal a decision; clarity as
to theories of liability; damages and governing law; uncertainties in timing of litigation; and the
possible need for further legal proceedings to establish the appropriate amount of damages, if any.
However, although there can be no assurance regarding the outcome of any of the legal proceedings
or investigations referred to in this Note 21 to the unaudited condensed consolidated interim
financial statements, the Company does not expect them to have a materially adverse effect on its
financial position. However, if one or more of such proceedings were to result in judgments
against the Company, such judgments could be material to its results of operations in a given
period.
Norfloxacin case
The Company manufactures and distributes Norfloxacin, a formulations product. Under the Drugs
Prices Control Order (the DPCO), the Government of India has the authority to designate a
pharmaceutical product as a specified product and fix the maximum selling price for such product.
In 1995, the Government of India notified Norfloxacin as a specified product and fixed the
maximum selling price. In 1996, the Company filed a statutory Form III before the Government of
India for the upward revision of the price and a legal suit in the Andhra Pradesh High Court (the
High Court) challenging the validity of the notification on the grounds that the applicable rules
of the DPCO were not complied with while fixing the ceiling price. The High Court had previously
granted an interim order in favor of the Company; however it subsequently dismissed the case in
April 2004. The Company filed a review petition in the High Court in April 2004 which was also
dismissed by the High Court in October 2004. Subsequently, the Company appealed to the Supreme
Court of India by filing a Special Leave Petition, which is currently pending.
41
DR. REDDYS LABORATORIES LIMITED AND SUBSIDIARIES
UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED INTERIM FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(in thousands, except share and per share data)
21.
Contingencies (continued)
During the year ended March 31, 2006, the Company received a notice from the Government of India
demanding the recovery of the price charged by the Company for sales of Norfloxacin in excess of
the maximum selling price fixed by the Government of India, amounting to Rs.284,984, including
interest thereon. The Company filed a writ petition in the High Court challenging this demand
order. The High Court admitted the writ petition and granted an interim order, directing the
Company to deposit 50% of the principal amount claimed by the Government of India, which amounted
to Rs.77,149. The Company deposited this amount with the Government of India in November 2005 and
is awaiting the outcome of its appeal with the Supreme Court. In February 2008, the High Court
directed the Company to deposit an additional amount of Rs.30,000, which was deposited by the
Company in March 2008.
The Company has fully provided for the potential liability related to the principal amount demanded
by the Government of India and believes that the liability due to interest and penalty is remote.
In the event the Company is unsuccessful in its litigation in
the Supreme Court, it will be required to remit the sale proceeds in excess of the maximum selling
price to the Government of India including penalties or interest, if any, which amounts are not
readily ascertainable.
Excise demand in relation to a subcontracting arrangement
During the fiscal year ended March 31, 2003, the Central Excise Authorities of India (the
Authorities) issued a demand notice to a vendor of the Company regarding the assessable value of
products supplied by this vendor to the Company. The Company has been named as a co-defendant in
this demand notice. The Authorities demanded payment of Rs.175,718 from the vendor, including
penalties of Rs.90,359. Through the same notice, the Authorities issued a penalty claim of
Rs.70,000 against the Company. During the year ended March 31, 2005, the Authorities issued an
additional notice to this vendor demanding Rs.225,999 from the vendor, including penalty of
Rs.51,152. Through the same notice, the Authorities issued a penalty claim of Rs.6,500 to the
Company. Furthermore, during the year ended March 31, 2006, the Authorities issued an additional
notice to this vendor demanding Rs.33,549. The Company has filed appeals against these notices.
In August and September 2006, the Company attended the hearings conducted by the Customs, Excise
and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (the CESTAT) on this matter. In October 2006, the CESTAT
passed an order in favor of the Company setting aside all of the above demand notices. In
July 2007, the Authorities appealed against CESTATs order in the Supreme Court.
Patent related matters
In April 2006, the Company launched its fexofenadine hydrochloride 30 mg, 60 mg and 180 mg tablet
products, which are generic versions of Sanofi-Aventis (Aventis) Allegra® tablets. The Company
is presently defending patent infringement actions brought by Aventis in the United States District
Court for the District of New Jersey. There are three formulation patents, three use patents, and
two active pharmaceutical ingredients (API) patents which are at issue in the litigation. The
Company has obtained summary judgment in respect of each of the formulation patents. Teva
Pharmaceuticals Industries Limited (Teva) and Barr Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (Barr) have been
defending a similar action in the same court. In September 2005, pursuant to an agreement with
Barr, Teva launched its fexofenadine hydrochloride 30 mg, 60 mg and 180 mg tablet products, which
are AB-rated (bioequivalent) to Aventis Allegra® tablets. Aventis has brought patent infringement
actions against Teva and its API supplier in the United States District Court for the District of
New Jersey. There are three formulation patents, three use patents, and two API patents at issue
in the litigation. Teva has obtained summary judgment in respect of each of the formulation
patents. On January 27, 2006, the District Court denied Aventis motion for a preliminary
injunction against Teva and its API supplier on the three use patents, finding those patents likely
to be invalid, and one of the API patents, finding that patent likely to be not infringed. The
issues presented during Tevas hearing are likely to be substantially similar to those which will
be presented with respect to Companys tablet products. Subsequent to the preliminary injunction
hearing, Aventis sued Teva and Barr for infringement of a new patent claiming polymorphic forms of
fexofenadine. The Company utilizes an internally developed polymorph and has not been sued for
infringement of the new patent. On November 18, 2008, Teva and Barr announced settlement of their
litigation with Aventis. Litigation between the Company and Aventis continues. No trial has been
scheduled at this time. If Aventis is ultimately successful in its allegation of patent
infringement, the Company could be required to pay damages related to fexofenadine hydrochloride
tablet sales made by the Company, and could also be prohibited from selling these products in the
future.
In February 2006, Merck & Co. (Merck) initiated proceedings against betapharm before the German
Civil Court of Mannheim alleging infringement of the basic patent for Fosamax (Mercks brand name
for alendronate sodium). Betapharm and some other companies are selling generic versions of this
product in Germany. Mercks patent, which expired in April 2008, was nullified in June 2006 by the
German Federal Patent Court. However, Merck filed an appeal against this decision at the German
Federal Supreme Court. The German Civil Court of Mannheim decided to stay the proceedings against
betapharm until the German Federal Supreme Court has decided upon the validity of the patent. In
March 2007, the European Patent Office granted Merck another patent for Fosamax which is relevant
to the composition of betapharms alendronate sodium product. Betapharm filed
42
DR. REDDYS LABORATORIES LIMITED AND SUBSIDIARIES
UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED INTERIM FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(in thousands, except share and per share data)
21.
Contingencies (continued)
protective writs to
prevent a preliminary injunction without a hearing. Betapharm has also filed an opposition against
this new patent at the European Patent Office, which has scheduled a hearing on the matter in March
2009. In August 2007, Merck initiated patent infringement proceedings against betapharm before a
German civil court. The German court decided to stay these proceedings until the European Patent
Office has rendered a decision on the validity of the patent. As of June 30, 2008, no injunction
had been granted to Merck. There are other jurisdictions within Europe where the patent at issue
has already been revoked. Based on a legal evaluation, the Company continues selling its generic
version of Fosamax. If Merck is ultimately successful in its allegations of patent infringement,
the Company could be required to pay damages related to the above product sales made by the
Company, and could also be prohibited from selling these products in the future.
The Company is aware of litigation with respect to one of its suppliers for oxycodon, which is sold
by the Company and other generics companies in Germany. In April 2007, a German trial court
rejected an application for an interim order by the innovator company against the Companys
supplier. The innovator has filed an infringement suit of formulation patents against
the Companys supplier in the German Civil Court of Mannheim as well as Switzerland (where the
product is manufactured). The Companys supplier and all licensees have filed a nullity petition at
the German Federal Patent Court, and have also filed a Declaration of Intervention Against at the
European Patent Office. The German court in Mannheim decided that the Companys suppliers product
is non-infringing, but the innovator appealed the decision. The appeal is pending. As of June 30,
2008, based on a legal evaluation, the Company continues to sell this product and believes that the
patent infringement case does not affect its ability to sell the product.
In October 2008, the United Kingdom Royal Court of Justice upheld the validity of Eli Lillys U.K.
patent covering Zyprexa®, its brand name for olanzapine. The Company is appealing the decision.
In view of this, the Company will not be able to launch its generic olanzapine product in the
United Kingdom unless it is successful in its appeal or until the expiration of the basic patent.
Due to the Companys loss of the case, it is required to compensate Eli Lilly for a portion of its
litigation costs. In November 2008, the Royal Court of Justice ordered that the legal costs
payable to Eli Lilly by the Company, after taking into account certain discounts and reductions,
would be between 0.77 million and 0.91 million pounds sterling. In November 2008, the Company paid
0.75 million pounds sterling as an interim payment. The Company has successfully obtained leave to
appeal against this decision. The legal costs recoverable by Lilly have been provided for in the
unaudited condensed consolidated interim financial statements.
During fiscal 2008, Eli Lillys German patent covering olanzapine was invalidated by the German
Patent Court. Eli Lilly, the innovator, appealed this decision before the German Federal Court of
Justice. Betapharm and certain other competitors have launched olanzapine products in Germany
pending the decision from the German Federal Court of Justice. Eli Lilly filed an application for
an interim order against betapharm claiming patent infringement at the court in Düsseldorf,
Germany, but in August 2008 the court decided not to grant the interim order due to lack of
urgency. In December 2008, the Federal Court of Justice overruled the German Patent Court and
decided to maintain the olanzapine patent in favor of Eli Lilly, the innovator. The Company has
subsequently stopped marketing this product in the German market. Eli Lilly, as part of the
litigation, is expected to claim damages. Pending finalization of the discussions between the
Company and Eli Lily, the Company in accordance with IAS 10 Events After the Reporting Date, has
recorded an amount of Rs.514.9 million as of June 30, 2008 representing its estimate of the
probable loss arising out of the innovators expected damage claims.
Environmental matter
The Indian Council for Environmental Legal Action filed a writ in 1989 under Article 32 of the
Constitution of India against the Union of India and others in the Supreme Court of India for the
safety of people living in the Patancheru and Bollarum areas of Medak district of Andhra Pradesh.
The Company has been named in the list of polluting industries. In 1996, the Andhra Pradesh
District Judge proposed that the polluting industries compensate farmers in the Patancheru,
Bollarum and Jeedimetla areas for discharging effluents which damaged the farmers agricultural
land. The compensation was fixed at Rs.1.30 per acre for dry land and Rs.1.70 per acre for wet
land. Accordingly, the Company has paid a total compensation of Rs.2,013. The matter is pending in
the courts and the possibility of additional liability is remote. The Company would not be able to
recover the compensation paid, even if the decision of the court is in favor of the Company.
Regulatory matters
In April 2008, the Company received a Civil Investigative Demand (CID) from the United States
Federal Trade Commission (FTC). A CID is a request for information in the course of a civil
investigation and does not constitute the commencement of legal proceedings. The Company has been
informed that the focus of this civil antitrust investigation relates to the settlement arrangement
entered into between the Company and UCB Pharma Inc. (UCB) resolving patent litigation concerning
levetiracetam. The Company believes that the terms of its settlement arrangement with UCB are
consistent with all applicable antitrust laws. The Company is cooperating fully with the FTC
regarding this investigation. The request in April 2008 from the
43
DR. REDDYS LABORATORIES LIMITED AND SUBSIDIARIES
UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED INTERIM FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(in thousands, except share and per share data)
21.
Contingencies (continued)
FTC sought information to
supplement the voluntary production the Company had completed on February 1, 2008. The Company
completed its response to the CID on June 23, 2008. Since the production of this information, the
FTC has not requested any further information from the Company nor expressed concerns regarding the
Companys agreement with UCB. The FTC did later request additional information from other parties
involved in this investigation. The Company understands that those productions have been completed
and that the FTC has indicated that it has no further information requests. The FTC has indicated,
however, that it is not formally closing its investigation at this time. While the Company does
not expect further requests for information or other action by the FTC with regard to the Companys
agreement with UCB, since the investigation remains open, the FTC maintains the ability to renew
its requests at a later date.
22.
Subsequent events
In July 2008, the Company purchased the entire equity holdings of Citigroup Venture Capital
International Mauritius Limited and ICICI Venture Funds Management Company Limited in Perlecan
Pharma Private Limited for an aggregate consideration of
Rs.757,802. As a result of this purchase, Perlecan Pharma Private Limited has became a consolidated
subsidiary of the Company.
In November 2008, the Companys German subsidiary betapharm participated in a competitive bidding
(or tender) process for 64 pharmaceutical products announced by Allgemeinen Ortskrankenkassen
(AOK), a large public health insurance company in Germany. In this tender, betapharm has been
offered 8 products translating to 33 contracts. The results of this tender, which were announced
in December 2008, have been put on hold, as these are being litigated by the drug manufacturers and
are subject to process reviews.
There exists significant uncertainity regarding
the ultimate outcome of this matter which is not under the direct control
of the Company and, therefore, consequent impairment and adjustments, if any, that may be necessary to be made to
the carrying value of the Companys intangible assets and goodwill pertaining to the Groups German
operations cannot be reasonably determined at present.
In December 2008, the Federal Court of Justice in Germany overruled a German Patent Court decision
and upheld the validity of Eli Lillys patent covering olanzapine. Betapharm, the Companys German
subsidiary, and certain other competitors had earlier launched olanzapine products in Germany
pending the outcome of such appellate court decision. The Company has subsequently stopped
marketing this product in the German market. Eli Lilly, as part of
the litigation, is expected to claim damages. Pending finalization of the discussions between the
Company and Eli Lilly, the Company in accordance with IAS 10, is
expected to claim. Events After the Reporting Date, has
recorded an amount of Rs.514.9 million, Rs.229.6 million
and Rs.224.4 million for the three month periods
ended June 30, 2008, September 30, 2008 and December 31, 2008, respectively, representing its
estimate of the probable loss arising from the innovators
expected damage claims.
44
ITEM 2. OPERATING AND FINANCIAL REVIEW
Three months ended June 30, 2008 compared to the three months ended June 30, 2007
The following discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial
statements, the related cash flow statements and notes, and the Operating and Financial Review and
Prospects included in our Annual Report on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2008, on
file with the SEC (our Form 20-F) and the unaudited condensed consolidated interim financial
statements contained in this Report on Form 6-K and the related cash flow statement and notes
(collectively, the Financial Statements).
During this year we have decided to adopt IFRS and its interpretations issued by the IASB as the
accounting principles for our filings with the SEC. An explanation of how the transition to IFRS
has affected the reported financial position and financial performance of the Company is provided
in Note 4 of the Financial Statements. This Note includes
reconciliations of equity, profit or
loss and cash flows for comparative periods under Previous GAAP to those reported for those periods
under IFRS.
This discussion contains forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties. When used
in this discussion, the words anticipate, believe, estimate, intend, will and expect
and other similar expressions as they relate to us or our business are intended to identify such
forward-looking statements. We undertake no obligation to publicly update or revise the
forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events, or otherwise.
Actual results, performances or achievements could differ materially from those expressed or
implied in such forward-looking statements. Factors that could cause or contribute to such
differences include those described under the heading Risk Factors in our Form 20-F. Readers are
cautioned not to place reliance on these forward-looking statements that speak only as of their
dates.
The Chief
Operating Decision Maker (CODM) evaluates our performance and allocates
resources based on an analysis of various performance indicators by operating segments. The
operating segments reviewed by the CODM with effect from April 1, 2008 are as follows:
|
|
|
Pharmaceutical Services and Active Ingredients (PSAI); |
|
|
|
|
Global Generics; and |
|
|
|
|
Proprietary Products. |
Pharmaceutical Services and Active Ingredients. This segment includes active pharmaceutical
ingredients and intermediaries, also known as active pharmaceutical products or bulk drugs, which
are the principal ingredients for finished pharmaceutical products. Active pharmaceutical
ingredients and intermediaries become finished pharmaceutical products when the dosages are fixed
in a form ready for human consumption, such as a tablet, capsule or liquid, using additional
inactive ingredients. This segment also includes contract research services and the manufacture and
sale of active pharmaceutical ingredients and steroids in accordance with the specific customer
requirements.
Global Generics. This segment consists of finished pharmaceutical products ready for consumption by
the patient, marketed under a brand name or as generic finished dosages with therapeutic
equivalence to branded formulations.
Proprietary Products. This segment involves the discovery of new chemical entities for subsequent
commercialization and out-licensing. It also involves our specialty pharmaceuticals business, which
is positioning to launch its sales and marketing operations for in-licensed and co-developed
dermatology products.
Accordingly, disclosures relating to the previous period have been reclassified/regrouped to
conform to the current period presentation. The explanations below have been suitably modified in
line with such changes.
45
The following table sets forth, for the periods indicated, our consolidated revenues and gross
profits by segment:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Rs. in millions) |
|
|
Three months ended June 30, 2008 |
|
|
Three months ended June 30, 2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues |
|
|
Gross |
|
|
profit % to |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues |
|
|
Gross |
|
|
profit % to |
|
|
|
Revenues |
|
|
% to total |
|
|
profit |
|
|
revenues |
|
|
Revenues |
|
|
% to total |
|
|
profit |
|
|
revenues |
|
Pharmaceutical
Services and Active
Ingredients |
|
Rs. |
4,613.3 |
|
|
|
30.7 |
% |
|
Rs. |
1,499.2 |
|
|
|
32.5 |
% |
|
Rs. |
3,634.3 |
|
|
|
30.3 |
% |
|
Rs. |
1,244.3 |
|
|
|
34.2 |
% |
Global Generics |
|
|
10,286.9 |
|
|
|
68.4 |
% |
|
|
5,941.8 |
|
|
|
57.8 |
% |
|
|
8,228.2 |
|
|
|
68.7 |
% |
|
|
4,878.3 |
|
|
|
59.3 |
% |
Proprietary Products |
|
|
38.5 |
|
|
|
0.2 |
% |
|
|
30.8 |
|
|
|
80.0 |
% |
|
|
52.5 |
|
|
|
0.4 |
% |
|
|
33.1 |
|
|
|
63.1 |
% |
Others |
|
|
99.1 |
|
|
|
0.7 |
% |
|
|
22.5 |
|
|
|
22.7 |
% |
|
|
68.1 |
|
|
|
0.6 |
% |
|
|
(86.9 |
) |
|
|
(127.8 |
%) |
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
Rs. |
15,037.8 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
Rs. |
7,494.3 |
|
|
|
49.8 |
% |
|
Rs. |
11,983.1 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
Rs. |
6,068.8 |
|
|
|
50.6 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following table sets forth, for the periods indicated, financial data as percentages of total
revenues and the increase (or decrease) by item as a percentage of the amount over the comparable
period in the previous year.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percentage of Sales |
|
Percentage |
|
|
Three months ended June 30, |
|
Increase/(Decrease) |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
25.5 |
% |
Gross profit |
|
|
49.8 |
% |
|
|
50.6 |
% |
|
|
23.5 |
% |
Selling, general and administrative expenses |
|
|
33.8 |
% |
|
|
29.9 |
% |
|
|
42.0 |
% |
Research and development expenses |
|
|
7.0 |
% |
|
|
6.7 |
% |
|
|
30.2 |
% |
Other expense/(income), net |
|
|
1.6 |
% |
|
|
(0.7 |
)% |
|
|
391.6 |
% |
Results from operating activities |
|
|
7.4 |
% |
|
|
14.7 |
% |
|
|
(36.6) |
% |
Finance income,
net |
|
|
0.5 |
% |
|
|
1.3 |
% |
|
|
(51.4 |
)% |
Profit before income taxes |
|
|
7.9 |
% |
|
|
16.0 |
% |
|
|
(37.7) |
% |
Income tax expense |
|
|
(0.6 |
)% |
|
|
(2.7 |
)% |
|
|
(73.9 |
)% |
Profit for the period |
|
|
7.4 |
% |
|
|
13.3 |
% |
|
|
(30.4) |
% |
|
46
Statement on Changes in Profit Figures Subsequent to Earnings Releases
On July 21, 2008, we issued an earnings release
for the three month period ended June 30, 2008
which discussed our unaudited condensed consolidated financial results as determined pursuant to
Previous GAAP. Subsequently, we elected to present our financial statements pursuant to IFRS and, on
October 23, 2008, we issued earnings releases for the three month periods ending June 30, 2008 and
September 30, 2008, which discussed our financial results under IFRS. In this October 23, 2008
earnings release, we reported a net profit of Rs.1,476,972 for the three month period ended
June 30, 2008. Subsequently, in December 2008, we noted an adverse judgment with respect to our
olanzapine litigation in Germany.
As a result of this development and in accordance with IAS 10, Events After the Reporting Period,
we have recorded a probable loss (net of related tax benefits) of Rs.365,679 arising out of this
dispute in our June 30, 2008 unaudited condensed consolidated interim financial statements as an
adjusting subsequent event. We had included the entire loss arising out of this litigation as part
of our earnings release for the three month period ended December 31, 2008. The loss has now been allocated
among the three month periods ended June 30, September 30, and December 31, 2008, respectively,
based on underlying sales of the product in the respective periods.
As a result of the allocation of the probable loss reported for the three month period ended
December 31, 2008 among the three month periods ended June 30, September 30, and December 31, 2008,
the profitability and related figures in the above referenced earnings releases will vary from the
figures contained in our unaudited condensed consolidated interim financial statements included in
Form 6-K for such periods. Accordingly, the cumulative profitability and related figures reported
for the nine months ended December 31, 2008 will be consistent with the earnings releases.
Revenues
|
|
Our overall revenues increased by 25.5% to Rs.15,037.8 million for the three months ended
June 30, 2008, from Rs.11,983.1 million for the three months ended June 30, 2007. Excluding
revenues from a unit of Dow Chemical Company associated with its United Kingdom sites in
Mirfield and Cambridge (hereinafter referred to as the Dow Pharma Unit), BASFs
Manufacturing facility in Shreveport, Louisiana, USA and related pharmaceutical contract
manufacturing (hereinafter referred to as the Shreveport facility) and Jet Generici SRL
(hereinafter referred to as Jet Generici), each of which was acquired in April 2008,
revenues grew by 21.4% to Rs.14,544.0 million for the three months ended June 30, 2008 from
Rs.11,983.1 million for the three months ended June 30, 2007. |
|
|
|
Revenues from our Pharmaceutical Services and Active Ingredients segment increased by 26.9%
compared to the three months ended June 30, 2007. This increase was primarily the result of
growth in revenues from North America (the United States and Canada), India and other rest of
the world markets (i.e., all markets other than North America, Europe, Russia and other
countries of the former Soviet Union and India). Excluding revenues of Rs.157.5 million from
the Dow Pharma Unit acquired in April 2008, revenues from this segment grew by 22.6% compared
to the three months ended June 30, 2007. |
|
|
|
Revenues from our Global Generics segment increased by 25.0% compared to the three months
ended June 30, 2007. This increase was primarily the result of growth in revenues from North
America (the United States and Canada), Europe, Russia and India.
Excluding revenues of Rs.313.6 million from the Shreveport facility as well as revenues of
Rs.22.7 million from Jet Generici, each of which was acquired in April 2008, revenues from this
segment grew by 20.9% compared to the three months ended June 30, 2007. |
|
|
|
For the three months ended June 30, 2008, we received 26.1% of our revenues from North
America (the United States and Canada), 26.2% of our revenues from Europe, 12.9% of our
revenues from Russia and other countries of the former Soviet Union, 19.4% of our revenues
from India and 15.4% of our revenues from other countries. |
Segment analysis
Pharmaceutical
Services and Active Ingredients.
For the three months ended June 30, 2008, this
segment contributed 30.7% of our total revenues, as compared to 30.3% for the three months ended
June 30, 2007. Revenues in this segment increased by 26.9% to Rs.4,613.3 million for the three
months ended June 30, 2008, as compared to Rs.3,634.3 million for the three months ended
June 30, 2007. Excluding revenues from the Dow Pharma Unit acquired in April 2008, revenues from
this
47
segment grew by 22.6% to Rs.4,455.8 for the three months ended June 30, 2008 from Rs.3,634.3 for
the three months ended June 30, 2007.
During the three months ended June 30, 2008, revenues in India accounted for 15.7% of our revenues
from this segment as compared to 14.7% for the three months ended June 30, 2007. Revenues in India
increased by 35.0% to Rs.722.4 million for the three months ended June 30, 2008, as compared to
Rs.535.2 million for the three months ended June 30, 2007. This increase was primarily due to an
increase in sales of ciprofloxacin hydrochloride and enrofloxacin, which increase was partially
offset by a decrease in sales of losartan potassium and ranitidine hydrochloride.
Revenues from outside India increased by 25.5% to Rs.3,890.9 million for the three months ended
June 30, 2008 from Rs.3,099.1 million for the three months ended June 30, 2007. Revenues in North
America (the United States and Canada) increased by 32.8% to Rs.1,084.8 million for the three
months ended June 30, 2008, as compared to Rs.816.5 million for the three months ended
June 30, 2007. The increase was primarily due to an increase in sales of naproxen, rabeprazole
sodium, sertraline hydrochloride, finasteride, clopidogrel and ramipril, which increase was
partially offset by a decrease in sales of naproxen sodium and amlodipine besylate.
Revenues from Europe decreased by 2.5% to Rs.1,079.8 for the three months ended June 30, 2008 from
Rs.1,107.2 million for the three months ended June 30, 2007. This decrease was primarily due to a
decrease in sales of montelukast, cetrizine hydrochloride, which decrease was partially offset by
an increase in sales of clopidogrel, olanzapine and ramipril.
Revenues from Rest of world markets (i.e., all markets other than North America, Europe, Russia
and India) increased by 46.9% to Rs.1,726.2 for the three months ended June 30, 2008 from
Rs.1,175.4 million for the three months ended June 30, 2007, primarily the result of an increase in
revenues from sales in Brazil and Mexico.
Global Generics.
For the three months ended June 30, 2008, this segment contributed 68.4% of
our total revenues, as compared to 68.7% for the three months ended June 30, 2007. Revenues in this
segment increased by 25.0% to Rs.10,286.9 million for the three months ended June 30, 2008, as
compared to Rs.8,228.2 million for the three months ended June 30, 2007. Excluding revenues from
the Shreveport facility and Jet Generici, each of which was acquired in April 2008, revenues from
this segment grew by 20.9% to Rs.9,950.6 million for the three months ended June 30, 2008.
Revenues from India constituted 21.4% of the revenues from this segment for the three months ended
June 30, 2008, as compared to 24.6% for the three months ended June 30, 2007. Revenues from India
increased by 8.9% to Rs.2,201.9 million for the three months ended June 30, 2008 from Rs.2,022.1
million for the three months ended June 30, 2007. This increase in revenues was due to an increase
in sales volumes of our key brands such as Atocor, our brand of atorvastatin, Razo, our brand of
rabeprazole, Omez DSR, our brand of omeprazole and domperidine, and Reditux, our brand of
rituximab. New products launched in India contributed Rs.77.6 million for the three months ended
June 30, 2008, which was partially offset by a decrease in sales volumes of Omez, our brand of
omeprazole, and Nise, our brand of nimesulide.
Revenues from outside India constituted 78.6% of the revenues from this segment for the three
months ended June 30, 2008 compared to 75.4% for the three months ended June 30, 2007. Revenues
from outside India increased by 30.3% to Rs.8,085.0 million for the three months ended
June 30, 2008 from Rs.6,206.1 million for the three months ended June 30, 2007.
Revenues from North America (the United States and Canada) increased by 62.9% to Rs.2,807.9 million
for the three months ended June 30, 2008 from Rs.1,724.0 million for the three months ended
June 30, 2007. This increase was due to sales of omeprazole launched in November 2007 and
meprobamate launched in March 2008 and also due to higher revenues from sales of fexofenadine,
citalopram, pravastatin and simvastatin, as well as revenues from sales of over the counter
products launched in September 2007.
Revenues from Europe increased by 12.0% to Rs.2,862.3 million for the three months ended
June 30, 2008 from Rs.2,556.6 million for the three months ended June 30, 2007. The increase was
primarily the result of an increase of revenues from betapharm by 20.0% to Rs.2,520.9 million for
the three months ended June 30, 2008 from Rs.2,100.8 million for the three months ended June 30,
2007. The increase in revenues from betapharm was primarily due to sales of Olanzapine beta, our
brand of olanzapine launched in September 2007, and higher revenues from sales of Oxycodon hcl
beta, our brand of oxycodone, Omebeta, our brand of omeprazole, and Alendronate beta, our brand of
alendronate. These increases were partially offset by higher State Healthcare Insurance (SHI)
fund rebates for the three months ended June 30, 2008. Revenues from sales of products in United
Kingdom decreased by 9.8% to Rs.294.9 million for the three months ended June 30, 2008 from
Rs.327.0 million for the three months ended June 30, 2007, primarily due to a decrease in sales of
amlodipine and omeprazole, which
48
decrease was partially offset by an increase in sales of
finasteride and terbinafine.
Revenues from Russia increased by 20.5% to Rs.1,498.3 million for the three months ended
June 30, 2008 from Rs.1,243.2 million for the three months ended June 30, 2007. This increase was
due to higher sales volumes of our key brands such as Nise, our brand of nimesulide, Ketorol, our
brand of ketorolac, and Cetrine, our brand of cetrizine. Revenues from other countries of the
former Soviet Union remained approximately the same at Rs.429.3 million for the three months ended
June 30, 2008 compared to Rs.423.5 million for the three months ended June 30, 2007, primarily
because of increases in revenues from Ukraine and Kazakhstan, which were completely offset by
decreases in revenues from Belarus and Uzbekistan.
Revenue
from other markets grew by 88.2% to Rs.487.3 million for the three months ended June 30, 2008, as
compared to Rs.259.0 million for the three months ended June 30, 2007, the result of growth of
revenues from Venezuela, Jamaica and the United Arab Emirates.
Gross Margin
Total gross margin as a percentage of total revenues was 49.8% for the three months ended
June 30, 2008, as compared to 50.6% for the three months ended June 30, 2007. Total gross margin
increased to Rs.7,494.3 million for the three months ended June 30, 2008 from Rs.6,068.8 million
for the three months ended June 30, 2007.
Pharmaceutical Services and Active Ingredients.
Gross margin of this segment was 32.5% of this
segments revenues for the three months ended June 30, 2008, as compared to 34.2% of this segments
revenues for the three months ended June 30, 2007. The decrease in gross margin is due to a change
in product mix (i.e., an increase in the proportion of lower gross margin products, such as
Ramipril and Montelukast, and a decrease in the proportion of higher gross margin products, such as
amlodipine besylate) for the three months ended June 30, 2008.
Global Generics.
Gross margin of this segment was 57.8% of this segment revenues for the three
months ended June 30, 2008, as compared to 59.3% of this segments revenues for the three months
ended June 30, 2007. The decrease was primarily due to a decrease in the proportion of our revenues
derived from high margin territories outside North America (the United States and Canada) and
Europe, such as India, Russia and other countries of the former Soviet Union, from 49.2% for the
three months ended June 30, 2007 to 43.6% for the three months ended June 30, 2008. In addition,
pricing pressures in Europe during the three months ended June 30, 2008 impacted gross margins of
this segment.
Selling, general and administrative expenses
Selling, general and administrative expenses as a percentage of total revenues were 33.8% for the
three months ended June 30, 2008, as compared to 29.9% for the three months ended June 30, 2007.
Selling, general and administrative expenses increased by 42.0% to Rs.5,085.3 million for the three
months ended June 30, 2008 from Rs.3,581.3 million for the three months ended June 30, 2007. This
increase was largely attributable to an increase in general expenses by 94.5%, primarily as a
result of an increase in legal and professional expenses due to higher consultancy activities
undertaken and higher product legal expenses during the three months ended June 30, 2008. Employee
costs increased by 33.1% for the three months ended June 30, 2008 as compared to the three months
ended June 30, 2007, due to an increase in head count and annual raises. Marketing expenses
increased by 33.1% for the three months ended June 30, 2008 as compared to the three months ended
June 30, 2007, primarily due to an increase in selling expenses and advertisement expenses. Selling
expenses increased primarily due to increases in the field sales force and promotional expenses for
the three months ended June 30, 2008 as compared to the three months ended June 30, 2007.
Advertisement expenses increased for the three months ended June 30, 2008 as compared to the three
months ended June 30, 2007, primarily as a result of higher advertisement expenses at betapharm due
to higher mailing advertisement costs, and in Russia due to a promotional campaign for Cetrine over
the counter products. Furthermore, amortization expenses increased by 8.7% to Rs.376.6 million for
the three months ended June 30, 2008 from Rs.346.6 million for the three months ended
June 30, 2007. This increase was primarily due to expenses from amortization of intangibles added
in the acquisition of the Dow Pharma Unit, the Shreveport facility and Jet Generici of Rs.27.6
million for the three months ended June 30, 2008.
49
Research and development expenses
Research and development costs increased by 30.2% to Rs.1,050.1 million for the three months ended
June 30, 2008 from Rs.806.3 million for the three months ended June 30, 2007. As a percentage of
revenues, research and development
expenditures accounted for 7.0% of our total revenue for the three months ended June 30, 2008 as
compared to 6.7% for the three months ended June 30, 2007. This increase was largely attributable
to an increase in manpower expenses due to an increase in the number of employees and annual
raises. Also, bio-study costs increased due to higher research and development activity undertaken
during the three months ended June 30, 2008.
Other expense/(income), net
Other expense was Rs.241.1 million for the three months ended June 30, 2008 as compared to income
of Rs.82.7 million for the three months ended June 30, 2007. This was primarily due to recording of
provision of Rs.514.9 million towards probable losses on account of recent developments of the Eli
Lilly damage claim on its olanzapine patent in Germany. This decrease was partially offset by
recognition of negative goodwill in respect of the Dow Pharma Unit, recognized in the profit and
loss account, of Rs.150.4 million, and also an increase in income from spent chemicals for the
three months ended June 30, 2008.
Results from operating activities
As a result of the foregoing, our results from operating activities decreased to Rs.1,117.8 million
for the three months ended June 30, 2008, as compared to Rs.1,764.0 million for the three months
ended June 30, 2007.
Finance income, net
For the three months ended June 30, 2008, our finance income decreased by 51.4% to Rs.77.0 million,
from Rs.158.4 million for the three months ended June 30, 2007, primarily as a result of the
reasons described below.
|
|
Our interest income decreased to Rs.69.4 million for the three months ended June 30, 2008
from Rs.261.4 million for the three months ended June 30, 2007, primarily due to a reduction
in our fixed deposit base which was primarily utilized for acquisitions and other operating
activities. |
|
|
|
Foreign exchange gain was Rs.175.8 million for the three months ended June 30, 2008 as
compared to Rs.299.4 million for the three months ended June 30, 2007. For the three months
ended June 30, 2008, there was a mark to market gain partially offset by losses on short
U.S.$/INR forward contracts and options taken to hedge foreign currency receivables and
deposits, and further offset by translation and realization losses on packing credit loans in
foreign currencies, all due to depreciation of the rupee by Rs.2.915 per U.S.$. For the three
months ended June 30, 2007, the rupee appreciated by Rs.2.765 per U.S.$, resulting in a gain
on short U.S.$/INR forward contracts and translation gains on packing credit loans in foreign
currencies, thereby offsetting the loss on translation of U.S.$ deposits. |
|
|
|
For the three months ended June 30, 2008, our interest expenses decreased by 41.9% to
Rs.243.0 million from Rs.418.3 million for the three months ended June 30, 2007. This was
primarily due to a decrease in the interest expenditures on short term loans and borrowings
for the three months ended June 30, 2008 as a result of our repayment of a short term packing
credit loan facility. Also, interest expense on long term debt decreased for the three months
ended June 30, 2008 as compared to the three months ended June 30, 2007 due to repayment of a
EURO 16.5 million loan during the intervening period as per the repayment schedule. |
Profit before income tax
As a result of the foregoing, profit before income taxes and minority interest decreased to
Rs.1,195.1 million for the three months ended June 30, 2008, as compared to Rs.1,918.4 million for
the three months ended June 30, 2007.
50
Income tax expense
Income tax expense for the three months ended June 30, 2008 was Rs.83.8 million, as compared to
Rs.321.7 million for the three months ended June 30, 2007. As a percentage of profit before income
tax, income tax expense was 7.02% for the three months ended June 30, 2008, as compared to 16.8%
for the three months ended June 30, 2007. The reduction in the effective tax rate during the three
months ended June 30, 2008 was primarily on account of tax benefits arising out of the losses in
our German operations, which were largely on account of provision for damages in the olanzapine
litigation.
Profit for the period
As a
result of the foregoing, our net income decreased to Rs.1,111.3 million for the three months ended
June 30, 2008, as compared to Rs.1,596.6 million for the three months ended June 30, 2007.
ITEM 3. LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
We have primarily financed our operations through cash flows generated from operations and short
term loans and borrowings for working capital. Our principal liquidity and capital needs are for
making investments, the purchase of property, plant and equipment, regular business operations and
drug discovery.
As part of our growth strategy, we continue to review opportunities to acquire companies,
complementary technologies or product rights. To the extent that any such acquisitions involve cash
payments, rather than the issuance of shares, we may need to borrow from banks or raise additional
funds from the debt or equity markets.
The following table summarizes our statements of cash flows for the periods presented:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended June 30, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
(Rs. in millions, U.S.$ in thousands) |
|
Net cash from/(used in): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating activities |
|
|
U.S.$21,420 |
|
|
Rs. |
919.6 |
|
|
Rs. |
2,274.7 |
|
Investing activities |
|
|
(67,212 |
) |
|
|
(2,885.4 |
) |
|
|
(744.6 |
) |
Financing activities |
|
|
(55,639 |
) |
|
|
(2,388.6 |
) |
|
|
(8,257.9 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase/(decrease) in cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
U.S.$(101,431 |
) |
|
Rs. |
(4,354.4 |
) |
|
Rs. |
(6,727.7 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash Flow from Operating Activities
The net cash provided by operating activities decreased to Rs.919.6 million for the three months
ended June 30, 2008 as compared to Rs.2,274.7 million for the three months ended June 30, 2007. The
net cash provided by operating activities decreased significantly
during the three months ended June 30, 2008 primarily due to:
|
|
A decrease in profits for the period by
Rs.488,372 million primarily attributable to higher
selling, general and administrative and research development costs; |
|
|
|
An increase in cash outflow primarily attributable to higher working
capital levels. This increase in
working capital levels was primarily due to increased inventory levels as needed to meet the anticipated
future requirements, as well as and an increase in
receivables resulting from increases in sales and operations. |
51
Cash Flow used in Investing Activities
Our investing activities provided a net cash outflow of Rs.2,885.4 million for the three months
ended June 30, 2008, as compared to a cash outflow of Rs.744.6 million for the three months ended
June 30, 2007. This increased cash outflow under investing
activities was due to:
|
|
Cash paid for the acquisition of the Dow Pharma Unit, the Shreveport facility and Jet
Generici during the three months ended June 30, 2008 amounting to Rs.3,089.1 million. |
|
|
|
Higher expenditures on property, plant and equipment during
the three months ended June 30, 2008
as compared to the three months ended June 30, 2007. |
The above outflows were partially offset by inflows from sale of investments, which were liquidated
to fund the acquisitions of the Dow Pharma Unit, the Shreveport facility and Jet Generici.
Cash Flows used in Financing Activities
Our financing activities provided a net cash outflow of Rs.2,388.6 million for the three months
ended June 30, 2008, as compared to net cash outflow of Rs.8,257.9 million for the three months
ended June 30, 2007. The decrease in net cash outflows from financing activities was primarily due
to significant repayment of long term debt in the three month period ended June 30, 2007, which
debt relates to our acquisition of betapharm.
The following table provides a list of our principal debts outstanding as of June 30, 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Debt |
|
Principal Amount |
|
Interest Rate |
|
|
(Rs. in millions, U.S.$/EURO in thousands) |
Short term loans and borrowings |
|
Rs. 3,776.4 |
U.S.$ |
50,200 |
|
Rupee borrowings - 9 % |
(for working capital) |
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign currency |
|
|
|
|
|
|
borrowings - |
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIBOR+ 110 bps |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign currency |
|
|
|
U.S.$ |
11,811 |
|
Borrowings - |
Long-term loans and borrowings |
|
Rs.15,075.1 |
EURO |
212,040 |
|
LIBOR + 70 bps or |
|
|
|
|
|
|
EURIBOR + 70 bps |
52
ITEM 4. RECENT DEVELOPMENTS
In July 2008, we purchased the entire equity holdings of Citigroup Venture Capital International
Mauritius Limited (Citigroup Venture) and ICICI Venture Funds Management Company Limited (ICICI
Venture) in Perlecan Pharma Private Limited (Perlecan Pharma) for Rs.757,802. Consequently,
Perlecan Pharma has become a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company. Perlecan Pharma was formed in
September 2005 as joint venture among the Company, Citigroup Venture and ICICI Venture. We, as a
part of this joint venture, had out-licensed four NCE assets to Perlecan Pharma. Perlecan Pharma
had been engaged in the clinical development and out-licensing of these four NCE assets.
In July 2008, we entered into a global distribution agreement for Ibuprofen API with Albemarle
Corporation (NYSE: ALB), a U.S.-based specialty chemicals company. Under the agreement, Albemarle
will supply Ibuprofen API from its Orangeburg Plant in South Carolina, U.S. to us for distribution
to our global client base.
In September 2008, we launched Combihale, a combination of a steroid and a long acting
bronchodilator, in India. It is used in the treatment of asthma and is available in two
combinations, Combihale FF (Formoterol + Fluticasone) and Combihale FB (Formoterol + Budesonide).
Combihale would be available along with Redihaler, a dry powder inhalation device designed
in-house, which will initially be given free of cost with Combihale.
In September 2008, we formally launched our U.S. Specialty Business through Promius Pharma, LLC, a
wholly-owned subsidiary located in Bridgewater, New Jersey. The launch marks a milestone in
building a sustainable and profitable branded business in the United States. Promius Pharma, which
will initially focus on the branded dermatology market, is based on a platform of strategic
licensing initiatives and internal product development activities undertaken over the last several
years. Promius Pharmas current portfolio contains innovative topical products for the treatment
of psoriasis, atopic dermatitis and seborrheic dermatitis. In October 2008, Promius Pharma launched
its first product, EPICERAM® skin barrier emulsion. EpiCeram® Skin Barrier Emulsion is a novel
prescription therapy for the treatment of atopic dermatitis, a skin disease.
In September 2008, we entered into a licensing and distribution agreement with Cosmederm
Technologies, a U.S. based specialty pharmaceutical company focused on dermatology and aesthetic
medicine. Under this agreement, we have exclusive rights to distribute Cosmederm Technologies
unique skin care products throughout India. The partnership is for two product lines: REFINITY peel
kits (glycolic acid 70%) and COSMEDERM peel kits (glycolic acid 50%). Through this partnership, we
are entering the aesthetic dermatology segment in India and consolidating our position in
cosmeceuticals.
In November 2008, we launched the authorized generic version of GlaxoSmithKlines Imitrex®
(sumatriptan succinate) tablets 25mg, 50mg, and 100mg in the United States. We are the first
company to launch an authorized generic version of Imitrex® tablets in the U.S. market.
GlaxoSmithKline Imitrex® tablets, which are indicated for the acute treatment of migraine attacks
in adults, had U.S. sales of $1.29 billion for the 12 month period ending December, 2007 according
to IMS Health, a company which provides information on the
pharmaceutical industry, in its Moving Annual
Total (MAT) report for the year ended December 2007.
In November 2008, our German subsidiary betapharm participated in a competitive bidding (or
tender) process for 64 pharmaceutical products announced by Allgemeinen Ortskrankenkassen
(AOK), a large public health insurance company in Germany. In this tender, betapharm has been
offered 8 products translating to 33 contracts. The results of this tender, which were announced
in December 2008, have been put on hold, as these are being litigated by the drug manufacturers and
are subject to process reviews.
In December 2008, the Federal Court of Justice in Germany overruled a German Patent Court decision
and upheld the validity of Eli Lillys patent covering olanzapine. Betapharm, our German
subsidiary, and certain other competitors had earlier launched olanzapine products in Germany
pending the outcome of such appellate court decision. We subsequently stopped
marketing this product in the German market. Eli Lilly, as part of
the litigation, is expected to
claim damages.
In December 2008, we announced the settlement with Schering-Plough Corporation and Sepracor Inc. of
patent challenge litigation for desloratidine, the generic version of Clarinex(R). The
settlement agreements allow us to manufacture and market desloratidine in various strengths, with
six months marketing exclusivity/co-exclusivity, starting in 2012. The agreements resolve all
pending patent infringement actions filed by Schering-Plough Corporation and Sepracor Inc. against
us in the U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey.
53
ITEM 5. TREND INFORMATION
Global Generics
The United States of America, Germany, India and Russia are the four key strategic markets for our
Global Generics business, contributing roughly 87% of the revenues of this segment for the nine
months ending December 31, 2008. In all of these markets, we continue to grow our revenues
consistently year after year as a result of our product franchise and customer and distributor
relationships built over the years.
In the United States, our revenues for the nine months ending December 31, 2008 represented an
increase of 128% as compared to our revenues for the nine months ended December 31, 2008, led by
impressive growth of our existing and new products, the successful launch of sumatriptan (our
authorized generic version of Imitrex®), as well as the revenues from the acquisition of the
Shreveport facility. We are also looking at new channels of growth in the coming years through our
over-the-counter business and government business to further increase the scale of our generics
business in the United States. The acquisition of the Shreveport facility in the United States was
a strategic move in building manufacturing and packaging capability in the United States.
In December 2008, we announced the settlement with Schering-Plough Corporation and Sepracor Inc. of
patent challenge litigation for desloratidine, the generic version of Clarinex(R). The
settlement agreements allow us to manufacture and market desloratidine in various strengths, with
six months marketing exclusivity/co-exclusivity, starting in 2012. The agreements resolve all
pending patent infringement actions filed by Schering-Plough Corporation and Sepracor Inc. against
us in the U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey. This settlement is in line with our
approach of exploring all opportunities to best monetize our Paragraph IV pipeline to create
visibility and certainty of launches.
Continuing with our stated strategy, we intend to expand our portfolio over the next few years by
adding solid dosage forms, as well as alternate dosage forms, and by complementing our internal
product development effort through business alliances. We intend to broaden not only our customer
base but also our products by focusing more on difficult-to-make and low competition products.
In November 2008, we launched the authorized generic version of GlaxoSmithKlines Imitrex®
(sumatriptan succinate) tablets 25mg, 50mg, and 100mg in the United States. This is a result of the
settlement of patent litigation in October 2006 with GlaxoSmithKline relating to sumatriptan
succinate tablets. We are the first company to launch an authorized generic version of Imitrex®
tablets in the United States market. Imitrex® tablets had U.S. sales of U.S.$1.29 billion for the
12 month period ending December, 2007 according to IMS Health in its MAT report for the 12 month
period ending December, 2007.
As of December 31, 2008, we had filed a total of 133 ANDAs with the U.S. FDA. We had 69 ANDAs
pending approval with the U.S. FDA as of December 31, 2008, which included 13 tentative approvals.
In Germany, the pharmaceutical industry continues to go through health care reforms which have put
pressure on prices. As of April 1, 2007, the Statutory Health Insurance Competition Strengthening
Act (also known as the GKV-WSG Act) took effect in Germany with the purpose of strengthening
competition in public health insurance to regulate the German health care system. The law has
significantly increased the power of the insurance companies and statutory health insurance (SHI)
funds by allowing them to enter into direct rebate contracts with suppliers of pharmaceuticals. It
further incentivizes doctors to prescribe generic drugs covered by such rebate contracts. The
pharmacist is also required, when dispensing drugs, to give a preference to such drugs as are
covered by rebate contracts. Thus, successfully concluding rebate contracts with insurance
companies is a factor critical to succeeding in the competition for market share in the generic
prescription drug market. betapharm has signed for rebate contracts with a large number of SHI
funds covering a major part of the insured population in the aggregate.
In January 2008, new reference prices became effective under the GKV-WSG Act. Subsequently, new
co-payment release prices were announced and which were effective June 1, 2008.
During fiscal 2009, we significantly reduced our dependence upon products from our single largest
supplier in Germany by shifting the sourcing to our own internal supply network in Europe and
India. During fiscal 2009, we successfully completed the transfer of the manufacturing processes
for a large part of our active pharmaceutical ingredient requirements to our manufacturing facility
in India. The benefits of this transfer include reduced product manufacturing costs and supply
assurance. We have begun to realize the benefits from the easing of supply pressures, and the
market share of betapharm in Germany has recovered to 2.6% in December 2008 as compared to a low of
1.74% in April 2007, according to Insight Health, a company
which provides information on the German pharmaceutical industry, in
its NVI market report for December 2008.
54
In August 2008, Allgemeinen Ortskrankenkassen (AOK), a large German health insurance company,
announced a
competitive bidding (or tender) process for pharmaceutical companies for 64 products for 2009 and
2010. In this tender, betapharm has been offered 8 products translating to 33 contracts. The
results of this tender, which were announced in December 2008, have been put on hold, as these are
being litigated by the drug manufacturers and are subject to process reviews. We believe that
ongoing health care reforms and changing market dynamics, in terms of a move to a commoditized
environment, will continue to cause pressure on price realization of our product portfolio in
Germany. We are monitoring the developments closely to take suitable actions to ensure that we
remain competitive.
In India,
Operation Research Group International Medical Statistics
(ORG IMS) in its December 2008 MAT report has noted that the Indian pharmaceutical market
continues to be highly fragmented and dominated by Indian companies. The industry recorded retail
sales of approximately U.S.$7 billion (Rs.341 billion), representing a growth in value of 9.8% over
the previous year on a MAT basis. According to such ORG IMS report, the Indian pharmaceutical
market is projected to grow at 12-14% per annum between 2008 and 2020, achieving a terminal market
value of U.S.$30 billion. The major growth influencers will be population dynamics, high disease
prevalence, increased health care access, changing health care models and greater capacity to
spend.
According to ORG IMS in its December MAT 2008 report, the market share of the No. 1 ranked Indian
retail sales pharmaceutical company was approximately 5%. In this competitive scenario, we are the
13th ranked Indian pharmaceutical company, with a market share of 2.2%. However our
growth during the nine months ending December 31, 2008 was below the industry growth rate, largely
due to a change in our supply chain model to a replenishment based model.
In Russia, we continue to match the industry growth rate in the retail segment. According to
Pharmexpert, a market research firm, in its April-November 2008 report, we grew by 25% as compared
to a market growth rate of 27% in Russia. We were the fastest growing international branded generic
company by sales volumes in Russia for such period, and we grew by
16% as compared to the industry decrease of 1%. In
the Pharmexpert MAT report for the quarter ending December 31, 2008, we are ranked No. 15 in sales in Russia,
with a market share of 1.4% for the quarter ending December 31, 2008. We also consolidated our new
hospitals and over the counter product businesses, which account for slightly more than 25% of our
Russian revenues and which are supplementing the growth led by our prescription business.
We continue to experience high growth from the countries in the former Soviet Union, Venezuela,
Jamaica and Sri Lanka through existing products and new product launches.
Pharmaceutical Services and Active Ingredients
In this segment, we are focused on acquiring new customers and increasing our level of engagement
with existing customers in global key markets by marketing additional products from our product
portfolio. We are also focused on identifying unique product opportunities in key markets and
protecting them through patenting strategies.
In this segment, we also market process development and manufacturing services to customers
primarily consisting of innovator pharmaceutical and biotechnology companies with an objective to
become their preferred partner of choice. The focus is to leverage our skills in process
development, analytical development, formulation development and Current Good Manufacturing
Practice (cGMP) manufacturing to serve the customers needs.
As of December 31, 2008, we had a pipeline of 335 drug master filings (DMFs), of which 138 were
in the United States. With patent expirations in several markets in the next few years, we intend
to promote growth in fiscal 2010 and beyond by leveraging our strong intellectual property
expertise and DMF pipeline. The success of our products in our key markets is contingent upon the
extent of competition in the generics market, and we anticipate that such competition will continue
to be significant.
For this segment, our revenues for the nine months ending December 31, 2008 grew by approximately
13% and the growth was mainly led by the active pharmaceutical ingredients division as well as the
acquisition of the Dow Pharma Unit. However, the business catering to the innovator pharmaceutical
and biotechnology companies did not register any growth due to the slowdown of orders from
biotechnology customers and the current global macro-economic factors.
Proprietary Products
Our investments in research and development of new chemical entities (NCEs) have been
consistently focused towards developing promising therapeutics. Strategically, we continue to seek
licensing and development arrangements with third parties to further develop our pipeline products.
As part of our research program, we also pursue collaborations with leading institutions
55
and
laboratories all over the world.
Currently, we have a pipeline of 2 NCEs in clinical development and 1 in pre-clinical development.
These compounds are being developed in partnership with Nordic Bioscience, ClinTec International
and Argenta Discovery. As we make progress in advancing our pipeline through various stages of
clinical development we are also building capabilities in drug
development. We believe this will help to enhance the value of our NCE assets. We expect to further complement
our internal research and development efforts by pursuing strategic partnerships and alliances in
our key focus areas.
Building a specialty branded business in the United States was one of the important aspects of our
innovation strategy. The specialty business has launched its own sales and marketing operations for
in-licensed products in the dermatology therapeutic area in the United States while continuing to
work on development of new in-house products. This is the result of our continued efforts over the
last few years to establish this business through a combination of in-licensing initiatives as well
as internal pipeline development programs. Consequently, through our subsidiary Promius Pharma, we
launched Epiceram, our first dermatology prescription product in the United States, in October
2008. In the month of January 2009, Promius Pharma launched our second dermatology prescription
product Scytera. While initially we do not anticipate this to be a very significant business in
terms of financial parameters, it is an important step in our journey of building a business based
on proprietary products.
ITEM 6 EXHIBITS
|
|
|
Exhibit Number |
|
Description of Exhibits |
|
|
|
99.1
|
|
Independent Auditors Report on Review of Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Interim Financial
Information |
56
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused
this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
|
|
|
|
|
|
DR. REDDYS LABORATORIES LIMITED
(Registrant)
|
|
Date: March 6, 2009 |
By: |
/s/ V.S. Suresh
|
|
|
|
Name: |
V.S. Suresh |
|
|
|
Title: |
Company Secretary |
|
|
57