10-Q
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
Form 10-Q
(Mark One)
|
|
|
þ |
|
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended: September 30, 2008
OR
|
|
|
o |
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from to
Commission file number: 001-32938
ALLIED WORLD ASSURANCE COMPANY HOLDINGS, LTD
(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)
|
|
|
Bermuda
|
|
98-0481737 |
(State or Other Jurisdiction of
|
|
(I.R.S. Employer |
Incorporation or Organization)
|
|
Identification No.) |
27 Richmond Road, Pembroke HM 08, Bermuda
(Address of Principal Executive Offices and Zip Code)
(441) 278-5400
(Registrants Telephone Number, Including Area Code)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed
by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or
for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated
filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of large
accelerated filer, accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act. (Check one):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Large accelerated filer þ |
|
Accelerated filer o |
|
Non-accelerated filer o |
|
Smaller Reporting Company o |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Do not
check if a smaller reporting company)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of
the Exchange Act). Yes o No þ
The number of outstanding common shares, par value $0.03 per share, of Allied World Assurance
Company Holdings, Ltd as of November 3, 2008 was 49,022,495.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
PART I
FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1. Financial Statements.
ALLIED WORLD ASSURANCE COMPANY HOLDINGS, LTD
UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
as of September 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007
(Expressed in thousands of United States dollars, except share and per share amounts)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of |
|
|
As of |
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
ASSETS: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed maturity investments available for sale, at fair value (amortized
cost: 2008: $5,440,019; 2007: $5,595,943) |
|
$ |
5,433,260 |
|
|
$ |
5,707,143 |
|
Other invested assets available for sale, at fair value (cost: 2008: $81,262; 2007: $291,458) |
|
|
71,528 |
|
|
|
322,144 |
|
Other invested assets, at fair value |
|
|
167,674 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total investments |
|
|
5,672,462 |
|
|
|
6,029,287 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
744,245 |
|
|
|
202,582 |
|
Restricted cash |
|
|
47,689 |
|
|
|
67,886 |
|
Securities lending collateral |
|
|
48,815 |
|
|
|
147,241 |
|
Insurance balances receivable |
|
|
359,921 |
|
|
|
304,499 |
|
Prepaid reinsurance |
|
|
166,161 |
|
|
|
163,836 |
|
Reinsurance recoverable |
|
|
777,283 |
|
|
|
682,765 |
|
Accrued investment income |
|
|
49,641 |
|
|
|
55,763 |
|
Deferred acquisition costs |
|
|
117,348 |
|
|
|
108,295 |
|
Goodwill and other intangible assets |
|
|
19,837 |
|
|
|
3,920 |
|
Balances receivable on sale of investments |
|
|
36,264 |
|
|
|
84,998 |
|
Net deferred tax assets |
|
|
10,198 |
|
|
|
4,881 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
52,387 |
|
|
|
43,155 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
8,102,251 |
|
|
$ |
7,899,108 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reserve for losses and loss expenses |
|
$ |
4,198,761 |
|
|
$ |
3,919,772 |
|
Unearned premiums |
|
|
880,211 |
|
|
|
811,083 |
|
Unearned ceding commissions |
|
|
28,172 |
|
|
|
28,831 |
|
Reinsurance balances payable |
|
|
79,592 |
|
|
|
67,175 |
|
Securities lending payable |
|
|
48,815 |
|
|
|
147,241 |
|
Balances due on purchase of investments |
|
|
68,681 |
|
|
|
141,462 |
|
Senior notes |
|
|
498,767 |
|
|
|
498,682 |
|
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities |
|
|
26,424 |
|
|
|
45,020 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
$ |
5,829,423 |
|
|
$ |
5,659,266 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common shares, par value $0.03 per share, issued and outstanding 2008: 49,022,495 shares and
2007: 48,741,927 shares |
|
|
1,471 |
|
|
|
1,462 |
|
Additional paid-in capital |
|
|
1,307,185 |
|
|
|
1,281,832 |
|
Retained earnings |
|
|
983,947 |
|
|
|
820,334 |
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income: net
unrealized (losses) gains on investments, net of tax |
|
|
(19,775 |
) |
|
|
136,214 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total shareholders equity |
|
|
2,272,828 |
|
|
|
2,239,842 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and shareholders equity |
|
$ |
8,102,251 |
|
|
$ |
7,899,108 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.
-1-
ALLIED WORLD ASSURANCE COMPANY HOLDINGS, LTD
UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
AND COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2008 and 2007
(Expressed in thousands of United States dollars, except share and per share amounts)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
REVENUES: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross premiums written |
|
$ |
290,981 |
|
|
$ |
276,253 |
|
|
$ |
1,134,638 |
|
|
$ |
1,245,208 |
|
Premiums ceded |
|
|
(57,078 |
) |
|
|
(56,956 |
) |
|
|
(253,913 |
) |
|
|
(281,480 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net premiums written |
|
|
233,903 |
|
|
|
219,297 |
|
|
|
880,725 |
|
|
|
963,728 |
|
Change in unearned premiums |
|
|
38,070 |
|
|
|
64,362 |
|
|
|
(66,804 |
) |
|
|
(90,384 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net premiums earned |
|
|
271,973 |
|
|
|
283,659 |
|
|
|
813,921 |
|
|
|
873,344 |
|
Net investment income |
|
|
76,916 |
|
|
|
76,133 |
|
|
|
226,192 |
|
|
|
222,718 |
|
Net realized investment losses |
|
|
(151,876 |
) |
|
|
(4,196 |
) |
|
|
(152,804 |
) |
|
|
(12,161 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
197,013 |
|
|
|
355,596 |
|
|
|
887,309 |
|
|
|
1,083,901 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EXPENSES: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net losses and loss expenses |
|
|
176,010 |
|
|
|
173,246 |
|
|
|
497,591 |
|
|
|
515,466 |
|
Acquisition costs |
|
|
28,615 |
|
|
|
29,198 |
|
|
|
81,720 |
|
|
|
90,266 |
|
General and administrative expenses |
|
|
40,794 |
|
|
|
36,050 |
|
|
|
130,445 |
|
|
|
103,685 |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
9,515 |
|
|
|
9,481 |
|
|
|
28,538 |
|
|
|
28,337 |
|
Foreign exchange gain |
|
|
(2,728 |
) |
|
|
(976 |
) |
|
|
(2,651 |
) |
|
|
(412 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
252,206 |
|
|
|
246,999 |
|
|
|
735,643 |
|
|
|
737,342 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Loss) income before income taxes |
|
|
(55,193 |
) |
|
|
108,597 |
|
|
|
151,666 |
|
|
|
346,559 |
|
Income tax (recovery) expense |
|
|
(8,826 |
) |
|
|
(362 |
) |
|
|
(12,117 |
) |
|
|
392 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NET (LOSS) INCOME |
|
|
(46,367 |
) |
|
|
108,959 |
|
|
|
163,783 |
|
|
|
346,167 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other comprehensive (loss) gain
Unrealized (losses) gains on
investments arising during the
period net of applicable deferred
income tax recovery (expense) for
three months 2008: $2,359;
2007: ($2,637); and nine months
2008: $2,601; 2007: ($4,929) |
|
|
(183,081 |
) |
|
|
84,384 |
|
|
|
(243,047 |
) |
|
|
44,292 |
|
Reclassification adjustment for
net realized losses included in
net (loss) income |
|
|
124,258 |
|
|
|
4,196 |
|
|
|
113,320 |
|
|
|
12,161 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other comprehensive (loss) gain |
|
|
(58,823 |
) |
|
|
88,580 |
|
|
|
(129,727 |
) |
|
|
56,453 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
COMPREHENSIVE (LOSS) INCOME |
|
$ |
(105,190 |
) |
|
$ |
197,539 |
|
|
$ |
34,056 |
|
|
$ |
402,620 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PER SHARE DATA |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic (loss) earnings per share |
|
$ |
(0.95 |
) |
|
$ |
1.80 |
|
|
$ |
3.37 |
|
|
$ |
5.73 |
|
Diluted (loss) earnings per share |
|
$ |
(0.95 |
) |
|
$ |
1.72 |
|
|
$ |
3.22 |
|
|
$ |
5.51 |
|
Weighted average common shares outstanding |
|
|
49,007,389 |
|
|
|
60,413,019 |
|
|
|
48,547,839 |
|
|
|
60,381,867 |
|
Weighted average common shares and common
share equivalents outstanding |
|
|
49,007,389 |
|
|
|
63,250,024 |
|
|
|
50,869,098 |
|
|
|
62,808,186 |
|
Dividends declared per share |
|
$ |
0.18 |
|
|
$ |
0.15 |
|
|
$ |
0.54 |
|
|
$ |
0.45 |
|
See accompanying notes to the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.
-2-
ALLIED WORLD ASSURANCE COMPANY HOLDINGS, LTD
UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY
for the nine months ended September 30, 2008 and 2007
(Expressed in thousands of United States dollars)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional |
|
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Paid-in |
|
|
Comprehensive |
|
|
Retained |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Share Capital |
|
|
Capital |
|
|
Income (Loss) |
|
|
Earnings |
|
|
Total |
|
December 31, 2007 |
|
$ |
1,462 |
|
|
$ |
1,281,832 |
|
|
$ |
136,214 |
|
|
$ |
820,334 |
|
|
$ |
2,239,842 |
|
Cumulative effect adjustment upon adoption of FAS 159 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(26,262 |
) |
|
|
26,262 |
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
163,783 |
|
|
|
163,783 |
|
Dividends |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(26,432 |
) |
|
|
(26,432 |
) |
Other comprehensive loss |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(129,727 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(129,727 |
) |
Stock compensation |
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
25,353 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25,362 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2008 |
|
$ |
1,471 |
|
|
$ |
1,307,185 |
|
|
$ |
(19,775 |
) |
|
$ |
983,947 |
|
|
$ |
2,272,828 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional |
|
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Paid-in |
|
|
Comprehensive |
|
|
Retained |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Share Capital |
|
|
Capital |
|
|
Income |
|
|
Earnings |
|
|
Total |
|
December 31, 2006 |
|
$ |
1,809 |
|
|
$ |
1,822,607 |
|
|
$ |
6,464 |
|
|
$ |
389,204 |
|
|
$ |
2,220,084 |
|
Net income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
346,167 |
|
|
|
346,167 |
|
Dividends |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(27,174 |
) |
|
|
(27,174 |
) |
Other comprehensive income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
56,453 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
56,453 |
|
Stock compensation |
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
17,242 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17,245 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2007 |
|
$ |
1,812 |
|
|
$ |
1,839,849 |
|
|
$ |
62,917 |
|
|
$ |
708,197 |
|
|
$ |
2,612,775 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.
-3-
ALLIED WORLD ASSURANCE COMPANY HOLDINGS, LTD
UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
for the nine months ended September 30, 2008 and 2007
(Expressed in thousands of United States dollars)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
CASH FLOWS PROVIDED BY OPERATING ACTIVITIES: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
163,783 |
|
|
$ |
346,167 |
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income to cash provided by operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net realized losses (gains) on sales of investments |
|
|
1,016 |
|
|
|
(25,544 |
) |
Impairment charges for other-than-temporary impairments on investments |
|
|
112,304 |
|
|
|
37,705 |
|
Change in fair value of hedge fund investments |
|
|
39,484 |
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization of premiums net of accrual of discounts on fixed maturities |
|
|
(9,917 |
) |
|
|
(3,072 |
) |
Amortization and depreciation of fixed assets |
|
|
6,957 |
|
|
|
6,335 |
|
Amortization of discount and expenses on senior notes |
|
|
341 |
|
|
|
316 |
|
Stock compensation expense |
|
|
20,980 |
|
|
|
17,333 |
|
Insurance balances receivable |
|
|
(55,422 |
) |
|
|
(15,809 |
) |
Prepaid reinsurance |
|
|
(2,325 |
) |
|
|
(19,232 |
) |
Reinsurance recoverable |
|
|
(94,518 |
) |
|
|
14,707 |
|
Accrued investment income |
|
|
6,122 |
|
|
|
6,889 |
|
Deferred acquisition costs |
|
|
(9,053 |
) |
|
|
(23,606 |
) |
Net deferred tax assets |
|
|
(2,716 |
) |
|
|
1,433 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
(8,442 |
) |
|
|
(1,965 |
) |
Reserve for losses and loss expenses |
|
|
278,989 |
|
|
|
194,965 |
|
Unearned premiums |
|
|
69,128 |
|
|
|
109,616 |
|
Unearned ceding commissions |
|
|
(659 |
) |
|
|
6,908 |
|
Reinsurance balances payable |
|
|
12,417 |
|
|
|
(24,218 |
) |
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities |
|
|
(18,595 |
) |
|
|
(10,117 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities |
|
|
509,874 |
|
|
|
618,811 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CASH FLOWS PROVIDED BY (USED IN) INVESTING ACTIVITIES: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases of fixed maturity investments |
|
|
(3,544,183 |
) |
|
|
(3,244,366 |
) |
Purchases of other invested assets |
|
|
(39,855 |
) |
|
|
(124,828 |
) |
Sales of fixed maturity investments |
|
|
3,593,861 |
|
|
|
2,584,697 |
|
Sales of other invested assets |
|
|
76,574 |
|
|
|
69,836 |
|
Net cash used for acquisition |
|
|
(44,052 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Changes in securities lending collateral received |
|
|
98,426 |
|
|
|
(490,744 |
) |
Purchase of fixed assets |
|
|
(6,333 |
) |
|
|
(7,066 |
) |
Change in restricted cash |
|
|
20,197 |
|
|
|
91,320 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities |
|
|
154,635 |
|
|
|
(1,120,611 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CASH FLOWS (USED IN) PROVIDED BY FINANCING ACTIVITIES: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends paid |
|
|
(26,432 |
) |
|
|
(27,174 |
) |
Proceeds from the exercise of stock options |
|
|
3,765 |
|
|
|
580 |
|
Changes in securities lending collateral |
|
|
(98,426 |
) |
|
|
490,744 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities |
|
|
(121,093 |
) |
|
|
464,150 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effect of exchange rate changes on foreign currency cash |
|
|
(1,753 |
) |
|
|
695 |
|
NET INCREASE (DECREASE) IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS |
|
|
541,663 |
|
|
|
(36,955 |
) |
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, BEGINNING OF PERIOD |
|
|
202,582 |
|
|
|
366,817 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, END OF PERIOD |
|
$ |
744,245 |
|
|
$ |
329,862 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash paid for income taxes |
|
$ |
6,162 |
|
|
$ |
2,824 |
|
Cash paid for interest expense |
|
|
37,500 |
|
|
|
38,021 |
|
Supplemental disclosure of non-cash flow information: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in balance receivable on sale of investments |
|
|
48,734 |
|
|
|
8,594 |
|
Change in balance payable on purchase of investments |
|
|
(72,781 |
) |
|
|
123,482 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.
-4-
1. GENERAL
Allied World Assurance Company Holdings, Ltd (Holdings) was incorporated in Bermuda on
November 13, 2001. Holdings, through its wholly-owned subsidiaries (collectively, the Company),
provides property and casualty insurance and reinsurance on a worldwide basis through operations in
Bermuda, the United States, Ireland, Switzerland and the United Kingdom.
2. BASIS OF PREPARATION AND CONSOLIDATION
These unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Holdings
and its subsidiaries and have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally
accepted in the United States of America (U.S. GAAP) for interim financial information and with
Article 10 of Regulation S-X as promulgated by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC).
Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and footnotes required by U.S. GAAP for
complete financial statements. In the opinion of management, these unaudited condensed consolidated
financial statements reflect all adjustments that are normal and recurring in nature and necessary
for a fair presentation of financial position and results of operations as of the end of and for
the periods presented. The results of operations for any interim period are not necessarily
indicative of the results for a full year.
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP requires management to
make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and
disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the
reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ
from those estimates. The significant estimates reflected in the Companys financial statements
include, but are not limited to:
|
|
|
The premium estimates for certain reinsurance agreements, |
|
|
|
|
Recoverability of deferred acquisition costs, |
|
|
|
|
The reserve for losses and loss expenses, |
|
|
|
|
Valuation of ceded reinsurance recoverables, |
|
|
|
|
Valuation of financial instruments, and |
|
|
|
|
Determination of other-than-temporary impairment of investments. |
Intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated on consolidation, and all entities
meeting consolidation requirements have been included in the consolidation. Certain immaterial
reclassifications in the unaudited condensed consolidated statements of cash flows have been made
to the prior periods amounts to conform to the current periods presentation.
These unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements, including these notes, should be
read in conjunction with the Companys audited consolidated financials statements, and related
notes thereto, included in the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2007.
3. NEW ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS
In February 2007, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Statement of
Financial Accounting Standards (FAS) No. 159 The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and
Financial Liabilities Including an amendment of FASB Statement No. 115 (FAS 159). FAS 159
permits entities to choose to measure many financial instruments and certain other items at fair
value. The objective is to improve financial reporting by providing entities with the opportunity
to mitigate volatility in reported earnings caused by measuring related assets and liabilities
differently without having to apply complex hedge accounting provisions. This statement is expected
to expand the use of fair value measurement, which is consistent with the FASBs long-term
measurement objectives for accounting for financial instruments. The fair value option permits all
entities to choose to measure eligible items at fair value at specified election dates. An entity
shall record unrealized gains and losses on items for which the fair value option has been elected
through net income in the statement of operations at each subsequent reporting date. The Company
adopted FAS 159 as of January 1, 2008. See Note 7 Fair Value of Financial Instruments regarding
the Companys adoption of FAS 159.
In September 2006, the FASB issued FAS No. 157 Fair Value Measurements (FAS 157). This
statement defines fair value,
-5-
establishes a framework for measuring fair value under U.S. GAAP and expands disclosures about
fair value measurements. FAS 157 applies under other accounting pronouncements that require or
permit fair value measurements. FAS 157 is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal
years beginning after November 15, 2007, and interim periods within those fiscal years. In October
2008, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position 157-3 Determining the Fair Value of a Financial Asset
When the Market for That Asset Is Not Active (FSP 157-3). FSP 157-3 clarifies the application
of FAS 157 in a market that is not active. The determination of whether a market is not active
requires significant judgment including whether individual transactions are forced liquidations or
distressed sales, whether observable inputs require significant adjustment based on unobservable
data and whether broker or pricing service quotes are determinative of fair value. FSP 157-3 was
effective upon issuance and is applicable to the unaudited condensed consolidated balance sheet as
of September 30, 2008. The Company adopted FAS 157 as of January 1, 2008. See Note 7 Fair Value
of Financial Instruments regarding the Companys adoption of FAS 157.
In December 2007, the FASB issued FAS No. 141(R) Business Combinations (FAS 141(R)). FAS
141(R) replaces FAS No. 141 Business Combinations (FAS 141), but retains the fundamental
requirements in FAS 141 that the acquisition method of accounting be used for all business
combinations and for an acquirer to be identified for each business combination. FAS 141(R)
requires an acquirer to recognize the assets acquired, the liabilities assumed, and any
noncontrolling interest in the acquiree at the acquisition date, measured at their fair values as
of that date. FAS 141(R) also requires acquisition-related costs to be recognized separately from
the acquisition, requires assets acquired and liabilities assumed arising from contractual
contingencies to be recognized at their acquisition-date fair values and requires goodwill to be
recognized as the excess of the consideration transferred plus the fair value of any noncontrolling
interest in the acquiree at the acquisition date over the fair values of the identifiable net
assets acquired. FAS 141(R) applies prospectively to business combinations for which the
acquisition date is on or after the beginning of the first annual reporting period beginning on or
after December 15, 2008 (January 1, 2009 for calendar year-end companies).
In December 2007, the FASB issued FAS No. 160 Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated
Financial Statements an amendment of ARB No. 51 (FAS 160). FAS 160 amends ARB No. 51 to
establish accounting and reporting standards for the noncontrolling interest in a subsidiary and
for the deconsolidation of a subsidiary. FAS 160 clarifies that a noncontrolling interest in a
subsidiary is an ownership interest in the consolidated entity that should be reported as equity in
the consolidated financial statements. FAS 160 requires consolidated net income to be reported at
the amounts that include the amounts attributable to both the parent
and the noncontrolling interest. This statement also establishes a method of accounting for changes in
a parents ownership interest in a subsidiary that do not result in deconsolidation and for changes
in a parents ownership interest in a subsidiary that does result in deconsolidation. FAS 160 is
effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning on or after
December 15, 2008 (January 1, 2009 for calendar year-end companies). The presentation and
disclosure requirements of FAS 160 shall be applied retrospectively for all periods presented.
In March 2008, the FASB issued FAS No. 161 Disclosures about Derivative Instruments and
Hedging Activities an amendment of FASB Statement No. 133 (FAS 161). FAS 161 requires
enhanced interim and annual disclosures about an entitys derivative and hedging activities
including how and why the entity uses derivative instruments, how the entity accounts for its
derivatives under FAS Statement No. 133 (Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging
Activities), and how derivative instruments and related hedged items affect the entitys financial
position, financial performance and cash flows. FAS 161 is effective for fiscal years and interim
periods beginning after November 15, 2008 (January 1, 2009 for calendar year-end companies). The
Company is currently evaluating the provisions of FAS 161 and its potential impact on future
financial statements.
In May 2008, the FASB issued FAS No. 162 The Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting
Principles (FAS 162). FAS 162 identifies the sources of accounting principles and the framework
for selecting principles to be used in the preparation of financial statements of entities that are
presented in conformity with U.S. GAAP. The current U.S. GAAP hierarchy is found in auditing
literature and is focused on the auditor rather than the entity. FAS 162 shall be effective 60
days after the SECs approval of the Public Accounting Oversight Board amendments to AU Section 411
The Meaning of Present Fairly in Conformity with Generally Accepted Accounting Principles. The
Company does not anticipate any impact on future financial statements due to the adoption of FAS
162.
In May 2008, the FASB issued FAS No. 163 Accounting for Financial Guarantee Insurance
Contracts an Interpretation of FASB Statement No. 60 (FAS 163). FAS 163 clarifies how FAS 60
Accounting and Reporting by Insurance Enterprises applies to financial guarantee insurance
contracts, including the recognition and measurement of premium revenue and claim liabilities. FAS
163 also requires expanded disclosures about financial guarantee insurance contracts. FAS 163 is
effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008 (January 1, 2009 for calendar year-end
companies), and interim periods within those fiscal years. The Company currently does not provide
financial guarantee insurance, and as such does not anticipate any impact on future financial
statements due to the adoption of FAS 163.
-6-
4. ACQUISITIONS
In November 2007, Allied World Assurance Holdings (U.S.) Inc. entered into an agreement to
purchase all of the outstanding stock of Finial Insurance Company (formerly known as Converium
Insurance (North America) Inc.) from Finial Reinsurance Company, an affiliate of Berkshire Hathaway
Inc. Finial Insurance Company was renamed Allied World Reinsurance Company, is currently licensed
to write insurance and reinsurance in 50 states and the District of Columbia and has been used to
launch the Companys reinsurance operations in the United States. This transaction closed on
February 29, 2008 for a purchase price of $12,000, the Finial Insurance Companys policyholders
surplus of $47,082, an adjustment for the difference between the fair values of investments
acquired under U.S. GAAP and statutory reporting of $300 and direct expenses of $387. The total
purchase price of $59,769 was paid in cash with available capital. As a part of the acquisition,
the Company recorded $12,000 of intangible assets with indefinite lives for the value of the
insurance and reinsurance licenses acquired. The remaining assets and liabilities acquired were
principally comprised of bonds, at fair value, of $31,690, cash of $15,330, other assets of $1,176,
deferred tax liabilities of $4,344 and a reserve for losses and loss expenses of $104,914, of which
100% were recorded as reinsurance recoverable as the entire reserve for losses and loss expenses
is ceded to National Indemnity Company, an affiliate of Berkshire Hathaway Inc. The Company also
recognized goodwill of $3,917 related to this acquisition, which is included in goodwill and other
intangible assets in the unaudited condensed consolidated balance sheets.
For
additional acquisition information, please refer to Note 13 regarding the acquisition of Darwin Professional Underwriters,
Inc.
5. INVESTMENTS
The amortized cost, gross unrealized gains, gross unrealized losses and fair value of total
investments by category as of September 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007 are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross |
|
|
Gross |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost |
|
|
Gains |
|
|
Losses |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
September 30, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. government and government agencies |
|
$ |
1,778,853 |
|
|
$ |
44,029 |
|
|
$ |
(366 |
) |
|
$ |
1,822,516 |
|
Non-U.S. government and government agencies |
|
|
121,001 |
|
|
|
7,389 |
|
|
|
(9 |
) |
|
|
128,381 |
|
Corporate |
|
|
1,260,158 |
|
|
|
4,712 |
|
|
|
(16,146 |
) |
|
|
1,248,724 |
|
States, municipalities and political subdivisions |
|
|
56,903 |
|
|
|
61 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
56,964 |
|
Mortgage backed |
|
|
2,115,265 |
|
|
|
12,601 |
|
|
|
(58,793 |
) |
|
|
2,069,073 |
|
Asset backed |
|
|
107,839 |
|
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
(255 |
) |
|
|
107,602 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total fixed maturity investments, available for sale |
|
|
5,440,019 |
|
|
|
68,810 |
|
|
|
(75,569 |
) |
|
|
5,433,260 |
|
Hedge funds |
|
|
167,674 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
167,674 |
|
Global high-yield bond fund |
|
|
81,262 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(9,734 |
) |
|
|
71,528 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
5,688,955 |
|
|
$ |
68,810 |
|
|
$ |
(85,303 |
) |
|
$ |
5,672,462 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. government and government agencies |
|
$ |
1,987,577 |
|
|
$ |
65,653 |
|
|
$ |
(6 |
) |
|
$ |
2,053,224 |
|
Non-U.S. government and government agencies |
|
|
100,440 |
|
|
|
18,694 |
|
|
|
(291 |
) |
|
|
118,843 |
|
Corporate |
|
|
1,248,338 |
|
|
|
10,114 |
|
|
|
(5,835 |
) |
|
|
1,252,617 |
|
Mortgage backed |
|
|
2,095,561 |
|
|
|
22,880 |
|
|
|
(902 |
) |
|
|
2,117,539 |
|
Asset backed |
|
|
164,027 |
|
|
|
897 |
|
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
164,920 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total fixed maturity investments, available for sale |
|
|
5,595,943 |
|
|
|
118,238 |
|
|
|
(7,038 |
) |
|
|
5,707,143 |
|
Hedge funds |
|
|
215,173 |
|
|
|
27,250 |
|
|
|
(988 |
) |
|
|
241,435 |
|
Global high-yield bond fund |
|
|
75,125 |
|
|
|
4,424 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
79,549 |
|
Other invested asset |
|
|
1,160 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,160 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
5,887,401 |
|
|
$ |
149,912 |
|
|
$ |
(8,026 |
) |
|
$ |
6,029,287 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Due to the adoption of FAS 159 as of January 1, 2008, the Companys investment in hedge funds
is included in other invested assets, at fair value on the unaudited condensed consolidated
balance sheet. As of September 30, 2008, the Companys investment in the global high-yield bond
fund is included in other invested assets available for sale, at fair value on the unaudited
condensed consolidated balance sheet. As of December 31, 2007, the Companys investment in hedge
funds, the global high-yield bond fund and other invested assets were included in other invested
assets available for sale, at fair value on the unaudited condensed consolidated balance sheet.
-7-
On a quarterly basis, the Company reviews the carrying value of its investments to determine
if a decline in value is considered to be other than temporary. This review involves consideration
of several factors including: (i) the significance of the decline in value and the resulting
unrealized loss position; (ii) the time period for which there has been a significant decline in
value; (iii) an analysis of the issuer of the investment, including its liquidity, business
prospects and overall financial position; and (iv) the Companys intent and ability to hold the
investment for a sufficient period of time for the value to recover. For certain investments, the
Companys investment advisers have the discretion to sell those investments at any time. As such,
the Company recognizes an other-than-temporary charge for those securities in an unrealized loss
position each quarter as the Company cannot assert it has the intent to hold those investments
until anticipated recovery. The identification of potentially impaired investments involves
significant management judgment that includes the determination of their fair value and the
assessment of whether any decline in value is other than temporary. If the decline in value is
determined to be other than temporary, then the Company records a realized loss in the consolidated
statements of operations and comprehensive income in the period that it is determined.
The following table summarizes the market value of those investments in an unrealized loss
position for periods less than or greater than 12 months:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2008 |
|
|
December 31, 2007 |
|
|
|
Gross |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Gross |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
Losses |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
Losses |
|
Less than 12 months |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Government and Government agencies |
|
$ |
7,071 |
|
|
$ |
(366 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Non U.S. Government and Government agencies |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate |
|
|
354,019 |
|
|
|
(14,724 |
) |
|
|
359,880 |
|
|
|
(5,734 |
) |
States, municipalities and political subdivisions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage backed |
|
|
658,245 |
|
|
|
(58,567 |
) |
|
|
172,673 |
|
|
|
(835 |
) |
Asset backed |
|
|
15,955 |
|
|
|
(254 |
) |
|
|
11,536 |
|
|
|
(4 |
) |
Hedge funds |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
51,512 |
|
|
|
(988 |
) |
Global high-yield bond fund |
|
|
71,528 |
|
|
|
(9,734 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1,106,818 |
|
|
$ |
(83,645 |
) |
|
$ |
595,601 |
|
|
$ |
(7,561 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
More than 12 months |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Government and Government agencies |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
71,404 |
|
|
$ |
(6 |
) |
Non U.S. Government and Government agencies |
|
|
2,752 |
|
|
|
(9 |
) |
|
|
33,227 |
|
|
|
(291 |
) |
Corporate |
|
|
9,100 |
|
|
|
(1,423 |
) |
|
|
22,544 |
|
|
|
(101 |
) |
States, municipalities and political subdivisions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage backed |
|
|
2,429 |
|
|
|
(226 |
) |
|
|
13,805 |
|
|
|
(67 |
) |
Asset backed |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
14,281 |
|
|
$ |
(1,658 |
) |
|
$ |
140,980 |
|
|
$ |
(465 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1,121,099 |
|
|
$ |
(85,303 |
) |
|
$ |
736,581 |
|
|
$ |
(8,026 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of September 30, 2008, the Companys investment portfolio had gross unrealized losses of
$85,303, that were primarily the result of increases in market interest rates during 2008 that
caused the market price of our fixed maturity investments to decrease, as well as widening credit
spreads related to increases in market risk premium and reduced market liquidity. Following the
Companys review of the securities in its investment portfolio, 181 and 388 securities were
considered to be other-than-temporarily impaired for the three and nine months ended September 30,
2008, respectively. Consequently, the Company recorded an
other-than-temporary-impairment charge of
$75,028 and $112,304 within net realized investment losses on the unaudited condensed
consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income for the three and nine months ended
September 30, 2008, respectively. An other-than-temporary charge was
recognized for those securities in an unrealized
loss position that the Companys investment advisers had the
discretion to sell. The following shows the other-than-temporary charges for fixed
maturity investments by category for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2008:
-8-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other-than-temporary- |
|
|
|
impairment charges |
|
|
|
For the three |
|
|
For the nine |
|
|
|
months ended |
|
|
months ended |
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2008 |
|
U.S. government and government agencies |
|
$ |
10,293 |
|
|
$ |
15,493 |
|
Non-U.S. government and government agencies |
|
|
233 |
|
|
|
684 |
|
Corporate |
|
|
44,293 |
|
|
|
51,761 |
|
States, municipalities and political subdivisions |
|
|
260 |
|
|
|
813 |
|
Mortgage backed |
|
|
18,213 |
|
|
|
39,818 |
|
Asset backed |
|
|
1,736 |
|
|
|
3,735 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other-than-temporary charges |
|
$ |
75,028 |
|
|
$ |
112,304 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Company recorded other-than-temporary-impairment charges, within net realized investment
losses on the unaudited condensed consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income,
of $25,382 and $37,705 for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2007, respectively.
Included in the other-than-temporary-impairment charges for the three and nine months ended
September 30, 2007 was a charge of $23,915 for the Companys investment in the Goldman Sachs Global
Alpha Hedge Fund PLC. As of September 30, 2007, the Companys basis in the fund was $57,495 and the
fair value was $33,580, resulting in a loss of $23,915. The Company reviewed its carrying value of
this investment in light of the significant changes in economic conditions that occurred during the
third quarter of 2007, which included subprime mortgage exposure, tightening of credit spreads and
overall market volatility. These economic conditions caused the fair value of this investment to
decline. On December 31, 2007, the Company sold its investment in this fund. The remaining
other-than-temporary-impairment charges were solely due to changes in interest rates.
During 2007, the Company submitted a redemption notice to sell its shares in the Goldman Sachs
Global Equity Opportunities Fund, plc. The Company sold its shares on February 29, 2008 and
recognized a loss on the sale of $278, which is included in net realized investment losses in the
unaudited condensed consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income for the nine
months ended September 30, 2008.
On June 30, 2007, the Company sold its shares in the Goldman Sachs Liquid Trading
Opportunities Fund Offshore, Ltd. The gain on the sale amounted to $484, which has been included
in net realized investment losses in the unaudited condensed consolidated statements of
operations and comprehensive income for the nine months ended September 30, 2007.
6. DEBT AND FINANCING ARRANGEMENTS
On July 21, 2006, the Company issued $500,000 aggregate principal amount of 7.50% Senior Notes
due August 1, 2016 (Senior Notes), with interest on the Senior Notes payable on August 1 and
February 1 of each year, commencing on February 1, 2007. The Senior Notes were offered by the
underwriters at a price of 99.71% of their principal amount, providing an effective yield to
investors of 7.54%. The Company used a portion of the proceeds from the Senior Notes to repay the
outstanding amount of its then existing credit agreement as well as to provide additional capital
to its subsidiaries and for other general corporate purposes.
The Senior Notes can be redeemed by the Company prior to maturity subject to payment of a
make-whole premium. The Company has no current expectations of calling the Senior Notes prior to
maturity. The Senior Notes contain certain covenants that include: (i) limitations on liens on
stock of designated subsidiaries; (ii) limitation as to the disposition of stock of designated
subsidiaries; and (iii) limitations on mergers, amalgamations, consolidations or sale of assets.
The Company was in compliance with all covenants related to its Senior Notes as of September 30,
2008 and December 31, 2007.
Events of default include: (i) the default in the payment of any interest or principal on any
outstanding notes, and the continuance of such default for a period of 30 days; (ii) the default in
the performance, or breach, of any of the covenants in the indenture (other than a covenant added
solely for the benefit of another series of debt securities) and continuance of such default or
breach for a period of 60 days after the Company has received written notice specifying such
default or breach; and (iii) certain events of bankruptcy, insolvency or reorganization. Where an
event of default occurs and is continuing, either the trustee of the Senior Notes or the holders of
not less than 25% in principal amount of the Senior Notes may have the right to declare that all
unpaid principal amounts and accrued interest then outstanding be due and payable immediately.
-9-
In March 2007, the Company entered into a collateralized $750,000 amended letter of credit
facility (the Credit Facility) with Citibank Europe plc. The Credit Facility will be used to
issue standby letters of credit.
In November 2007, the Company entered into a $800,000 five-year senior credit facility
(the Facility) with a syndication of lenders. The Facility consists of a $400,000 secured letter
of credit facility for the issuance of standby letters of credit (the Secured Facility) and a
$400,000 unsecured facility for the making of revolving loans and for the issuance of standby
letters of credit (the Unsecured Facility). Both the Secured Facility and the Unsecured Facility
have options to increase the aggregate commitments by up to $200,000, subject to approval of the
lenders. The Facility will be used for general corporate purposes and to issue standby letters of
credit. The Facility contains representations, warranties and covenants customary for similar bank
loan facilities, including a covenant to maintain a ratio of consolidated indebtedness to total
capitalization as of the last day of each fiscal quarter or fiscal year of not greater than 0.35 to
1.0 and a covenant under the Unsecured Facility to maintain a certain consolidated net worth. In
addition, each material insurance subsidiary must maintain a financial strength rating from A.M.
Best Company of at least A- under the Unsecured Facility and of at least B++ under the Secured
Facility. The Company is in compliance with all covenants under the Facility as of September 30,
2008 and December 31, 2007.
There are a total of 13 lenders who make up the Facility syndication and have varying
commitments ranging from $20,000 to $87,500. Of the 13 lenders, four have commitments of $87,500
each, four have commitments of $62,500 each, four have commitments of $45,000 each and one has a
commitment of $20,000. One of the lenders in the Facility with a $20,000 commitment has declared
bankruptcy under Chapter 11 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code. The Company does not expect this lender
to be able to meet its commitment under the Facility.
The Company currently has access to up to $1,550,000 in letters of credit under the two
letter of credit facilities described above. These facilities are used to provide security to
reinsureds and are collateralized by the Company, at least to the extent of letters of credit
outstanding at any given time. As of September 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007, there were
outstanding letters of credit totaling $908,033 and $922,206, respectively, under the two
facilities. Collateral committed to support the letter of credit facilities was $1,090,982 as of
September 30, 2008, compared to $1,170,731 as of December 31, 2007.
At this time, the Company uses trust accounts primarily to meet security requirements for
inter-company and certain related-party reinsurance transactions. The Company also has cash and
cash equivalents and investments on deposit with various state or government insurance departments
or pledged in favor of ceding companies in order to comply with relevant insurance regulations. As
of September 30, 2008, total trust account deposits were $698,354 compared to $802,737 as of
December 31, 2007.
7. FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS
The Company adopted FAS 159 as of January 1, 2008, and has elected the fair value option for
its hedge fund investments, which are classified as other invested assets, at fair value in the
unaudited condensed consolidated balance sheets. At the time of adoption, the fair value and
carrying value of the hedge fund investments were $241,435 and the net unrealized gain was $26,262.
The Company has elected the fair value option for its hedge fund investments as the Company
believes that recognizing changes in the fair value of the hedge funds in the consolidated
statements of operations and comprehensive income each period better reflects the results of the
Companys investment in the hedge funds rather than recognizing changes in fair value in
accumulated other comprehensive income.
Upon adoption of FAS 159, the Company reclassified the net unrealized gain related to the
hedge funds of $26,262 from accumulated other comprehensive income and recorded a
cumulative-effect adjustment in retained earnings. There was no net deferred tax liability
associated with the net unrealized gain as the hedge fund investments are held by a Bermuda
insurance subsidiary that pays no income tax. Any subsequent change in unrealized gain or loss of
other invested assets, at fair value will be recognized in the consolidated statements of
operations and comprehensive income and included in net realized investment gains or losses. Prior
to the adoption of FAS 159 any change in unrealized gain or loss was included in accumulated other
comprehensive income in the unaudited condensed consolidated balance sheet. The net loss
recognized for the change in fair value of the hedge fund investments in the unaudited condensed
consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income during the three and nine months
ended September 30, 2008 was $27,617 and $39,484, respectively.
The Company adopted FAS 157 as of January 1, 2008. This statement defines fair value and
establishes a framework for measuring fair value under U.S. GAAP. FAS 157 defines fair value as
the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly
transaction between market participants at the measurement date. FAS 157 also established a
three-level valuation hierarchy for disclosure of fair value measurements. The valuation hierarchy
is based upon whether the inputs to the
-10-
valuation of an asset or liability are observable or unobservable in the market at the
measurement date, with quoted market prices being the highest level (Level 1) and unobservable
inputs being the lowest level (Level 3). A fair value measurement will fall within the level of
the hierarchy based on the input that is significant to determining such measurement. The three
levels are defined as follows:
|
|
|
Level 1: Observable inputs to the valuation methodology that are quoted prices
(unadjusted) for identical assets or liabilities in active markets. |
|
|
|
|
Level 2: Observable inputs to the valuation methodology other than quoted market prices
(unadjusted) for identical assets or liabilities in active markets. Level 2 inputs include
quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets, quoted prices for
identical assets in markets that are not active and inputs other than quoted prices that
are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly, for substantially
the full term of the asset or liability. |
|
|
|
|
Level 3: Inputs to the valuation methodology that are unobservable for the asset or
liability. |
The following table shows the fair value of the Companys financial instruments and where in
the FAS 157 fair value hierarchy the fair value measurements are included as of September 30, 2008.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value measurement using: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quoted prices |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
in active |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Significant |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
markets for |
|
|
Significant other |
|
|
unobservable |
|
|
|
Carrying |
|
|
Total fair |
|
|
identical assets |
|
|
observable inputs |
|
|
inputs |
|
|
|
amount |
|
|
value |
|
|
(Level 1) |
|
|
(Level 2) |
|
|
(Level 3) |
|
U.S. government and government agencies |
|
$ |
1,822,516 |
|
|
$ |
1,822,516 |
|
|
$ |
922,117 |
|
|
$ |
900,399 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
Non-U.S. government and government agencies |
|
|
128,381 |
|
|
|
128,381 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
128,381 |
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate |
|
|
1,248,724 |
|
|
|
1,248,724 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,248,724 |
|
|
|
|
|
States, municipalities and political
subdivisions |
|
|
56,964 |
|
|
|
56,964 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
56,964 |
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage backed |
|
|
2,069,073 |
|
|
|
2,069,073 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,069,073 |
|
|
|
|
|
Asset backed |
|
|
107,602 |
|
|
|
107,602 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
107,602 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total fixed maturity investments, available
for sale |
|
|
5,433,260 |
|
|
|
5,433,260 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other invested assets, fair value |
|
|
167,674 |
|
|
|
167,674 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
167,674 |
|
Total other invested assets, available for sale |
|
|
71,528 |
|
|
|
71,528 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
71,528 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total investments |
|
|
5,672,462 |
|
|
|
5,672,462 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior notes |
|
|
498,767 |
|
|
|
442,300 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
442,300 |
|
|
|
|
|
The following describes the valuation techniques used by the Company to determine the fair
value of financial instruments held as of September 30, 2008.
U.S. government and U.S. government agencies: Comprised primarily of bonds issued by the U.S.
Treasury, the Federal Home Loan Bank, the Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation and the Federal
National Mortgage Association. The fair values of the Companys U.S. government securities are
based on quoted market prices in active markets, and are included in the Level 1 fair value
hierarchy. The Company believes the market for U.S. Treasury securities is an actively traded
market given the high level of daily trading volume. The fair values of U.S. government agency
securities are priced using the spread above the risk-free yield curve. As the yields for the
risk-free yield curve are observable market inputs, the fair values of U.S. government agency
securities are included in the Level 2 fair value hierarchy.
Non-U.S. government and government agencies: Comprised of fixed income obligations of
non-U.S. governmental entities. The fair values of these securities are based on prices obtained
from broker/dealers and international indices, and are included in the Level 2 fair value
hierarchy.
Corporate: Comprised of bonds issued by corporations that on acquisition are rated BBB-/Baa3
or higher provided that, in aggregate, corporate bonds with ratings of BBB-/Baa3 do not constitute
more than 5% of the market value of the Companys fixed income securities and are diversified
across a wide range of issuers and industries. The fair values of corporate bonds that are short-
-11-
term are priced using spread above the London Interbank Offering Rate yield curve, and the
fair value of corporate bonds that are long-term are priced using the spread above the risk-free
yield curve. The spreads are sourced from broker/dealers, trade prices and the new issue market.
As the significant inputs used to price corporate bonds are observable market inputs, the fair values of
corporate bonds are included in the Level 2 fair value hierarchy.
States, municipalities and political subdivisions: Comprised of fixed income obligations of
U.S. domiciled state and municipality entities. The fair values of
these securities are based on prices obtained from broker/dealers and the new issue market, and are included in the Level 2 fair value hierarchy.
Mortgage-backed: Principally comprised of AAA-rated pools of residential and commercial
mortgages originated by both agency (such as the Federal National Mortgage Association) and
non-agency originators. The fair values of mortgage-backed securities originated by U.S.
government agencies and non-U.S. government agencies are based on a pricing model that incorporates
prepayment speeds and spreads to determine appropriate average life of mortgage-backed securities.
The spreads are sourced from broker/dealers, trade prices and the new issue market. As the
significant inputs used to price the mortgage-backed securities are observable market inputs, the
fair values of these securities are included in the Level 2 fair value hierarchy.
Asset-backed: Comprised of primarily AAA-rated bonds backed by pools of automobile loan
receivables, home equity loans and credit card receivables originated by a variety of financial
institutions. The fair values of asset-backed securities are priced using prepayment speed and
spread inputs that are sourced from the new issue market. As the significant inputs used to price
the asset-backed securities are observable market inputs, the fair values of these securities are
included in the Level 2 fair value hierarchy.
Other invested assets, at fair value: Comprised of four hedge funds invested in a range of
diversified strategies. The fair values of the hedge funds are based on the net asset value of the
funds as reported by the fund manager less a liquidity discount where hedge fund investments
contain lock-up provisions that prevent immediate dissolution. The Company considers these lock-up
provisions to be obligations that market participants would assign a value to in determining the
price of these hedge funds, and as such have considered these obligations in determining the fair
value measurement of the related hedge funds. The liquidity discount was estimated by calculating
the value of a protective put over the lock-up period. The protective put measures the risk of
holding a restricted asset over a certain time period. The Company used the Black-Scholes
option-pricing model to estimate the value of the protective put for each hedge fund. The
aggregate liquidity discount recognized during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2008
was $(33) and $237, respectively. The net asset value and the liquidity discount are significant
unobservable inputs, and as such the fair values of the Companys hedge funds are included in the
Level 3 fair value hierarchy.
Other invested assets available for sale: Comprised of an open-end global high-yield bond
fund that invests in non-investment grade bonds issued by various issuers and industries. The fair
value of the global high-yield bond fund is based on the net asset value as reported by the fund
manager. The net asset value is an observable input as it is quoted on a market exchange on a
daily basis. The fair value of the global high-yield bond fund is included in the Level 2 fair
value hierarchy.
Senior notes: The fair value of the senior notes is based on the price as published by
Bloomberg, which was 88.46% of their principal amount, providing an effective yield of 9.63% as of
September 30, 2008. The fair value of the senior notes is included in the Level 2 fair value
hierarchy.
-12-
The following is a reconciliation of the beginning and ending balance of financial instruments
using significant unobservable inputs (Level 3) for the three and nine months ended September 30,
2008.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value measurement
using significant |
|
|
|
unobservable inputs
(Level 3): |
|
|
|
hedge funds |
|
|
|
Three months ended |
|
|
Nine months ended |
|
|
|
September 30, 2008 |
|
|
September 30, 2008 |
|
Opening balance |
|
$ |
192,661 |
|
|
$ |
241,435 |
|
Total gains or losses included in earnings: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Realized gains |
|
|
2,449 |
|
|
|
8,562 |
|
Change in fair value of hedge fund investments |
|
|
(27,617 |
) |
|
|
(39,484 |
) |
Purchases or sales |
|
|
181 |
|
|
|
(42,839 |
) |
Transfers in and/or out of Level 3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ending balance, September 30, 2008 |
|
$ |
167,674 |
|
|
$ |
167,674 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8. INCOME TAXES
Certain subsidiaries of Holdings file U.S. federal income tax returns and various U.S. state
income tax returns, as well as income tax returns in the U.K. and Ireland. The tax years open to
examination by the U.S. Internal Revenue Service for the U.S. subsidiaries are the fiscal years
from 2004 to the present. The tax years open to examination by the Inland Revenue for the U.K.
branches are fiscal years from 2004 to the present. The tax years open to examination by Irish
Revenue Commissioners for the Irish subsidiaries are the
fiscal years from 2003 to the present. To the best of the Companys knowledge, there are no
examinations pending by the U.S. Internal Revenue Service, the Inland Revenue or the Irish Revenue
Commissioners.
Management has deemed all material tax positions to have a greater than 50% likelihood of
being sustained based on technical merits if challenged. The Company has not recorded any interest
or penalties during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2008 and 2007 and has not accrued
any payment of interest or penalties as of September 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007.
The Company does not expect any material unrecognized tax benefits within 12 months of January
1, 2008.
9. SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY
a) Authorized shares
The authorized share capital of Holdings as of September 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007 was
$10,000.
The issued share capital consists of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2008 |
|
|
December 31, 2007 |
|
Common shares issued and fully paid, par value $0.03 per share |
|
|
49,022,495 |
|
|
|
48,741,927 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Share capital at end of period |
|
$ |
1,471 |
|
|
$ |
1,462 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of September 30, 2008, there were outstanding 35,412,797 voting common shares and
13,609,698 non-voting common shares.
b) Dividends
In 2008, the Company has paid quarterly dividends of $0.18 per common share on April 3, 2008,
June 12, 2008 and September 11, 2008, payable to shareholders of record on March 18, 2008, May 27,
2008 and August 26, 2008, respectively. The total dividends paid amounted to $26,432.
For the nine months ended September 30, 2007, the Company paid quarterly dividends of $0.15
per common share on April 5, 2007, June 14, 2007 and September 13, 2007, payable to shareholders of
record on March 20, 2007, May 29, 2007 and August 28,
2007, respectively. The total dividends paid amounted to $27,174.
-13-
10. EMPLOYEE BENEFIT PLANS
a) Employee option plan
In 2001, the Company implemented the Allied World Assurance Company Holdings, Ltd Second
Amended and Restated 2001 Employee Stock Option Plan (the Plan). Under the Plan, up to 4,000,000
common shares of Holdings may be issued. Holdings has filed a registration statement on Form S-8
under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, to register common shares issued or reserved for
issuance under the Plan. These options are exercisable in certain limited conditions, expire after
10 years, and generally vest pro-rata over four years from the date of grant. The exercise price of
options issued are determined by the compensation committee of the Board of Directors but shall not
be less than 100% of the fair market value of the common shares of Holdings on the date the option
award is granted.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine months ended September 30, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted Average |
|
|
Options |
|
Exercise Price |
Outstanding at beginning of period |
|
|
1,223,875 |
|
|
$ |
31.03 |
|
Granted |
|
|
294,300 |
|
|
|
42.75 |
|
Exercised |
|
|
(138,615 |
) |
|
|
27.31 |
|
Forfeited |
|
|
(14,209 |
) |
|
|
37.26 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at end of period |
|
|
1,365,351 |
|
|
$ |
33.87 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assumptions used in the option-pricing model for the options granted during the nine months
ended September 30, 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
Options granted during |
|
|
the nine months ended |
|
|
September 30, 2008 |
Expected term of option |
|
6.25 years |
Weighted average risk-free interest rate |
|
2.58% |
Expected volatility |
|
23.57% |
Dividend yield |
|
1.66% |
Weighted average fair value on grant date |
|
$9.77 |
|
|
|
There is limited historical data available for the Company to base the expected term of the
options. As these options are considered to have standard characteristics, the Company has used
the simplified method to determine the expected life as set forth in the SECs Staff Accounting
Bulletins 107 and 110. Likewise, as the Company became a public company in July 2006, there is
limited historical data available on which to base the volatility of its common shares. As such,
the Company used the average of five volatility statistics from comparable companies, as well as
the Companys volatility, in order to derive the volatility value above. The Company has assumed a
forfeiture rate of 4.91% in determining the compensation expense over the service period.
Compensation expense of $614 and $620 relating to the options has been recognized in general
and administrative expenses in the Companys unaudited condensed consolidated statements of
operations and comprehensive income for the three months ended September 30, 2008 and 2007,
respectively. Compensation expense of $1,794 and $1,936 relating to the options has been recognized
in general and administrative expenses in the Companys unaudited condensed consolidated
statements of operations and comprehensive income for the nine months ended September 30, 2008 and
2007, respectively. As of September 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007, the Company recorded in
additional paid-in capital on the unaudited condensed consolidated balance sheets amounts of
$17,438 and $11,840, respectively, in connection with all options granted.
-14-
b) Stock incentive plan
In 2004, the Company implemented the Allied World Assurance Company Holdings, Ltd Second
Amended and Restated 2004 Stock Incentive Plan (the Stock Incentive Plan). The Stock Incentive
Plan provides for grants of restricted stock, restricted stock units (RSUs), dividend equivalent
rights and other equity-based awards. A total of 2,000,000 common shares may be issued under the
Stock Incentive Plan. To date only RSUs have been granted. These RSUs generally vest pro-rata over
four years from the date of grant or in the fourth or fifth year from the original grant date.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine months ended September 30, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Grant Date Fair |
|
|
RSUs |
|
Value |
Outstanding RSUs at beginning of period |
|
|
820,890 |
|
|
$ |
36.09 |
|
RSUs granted |
|
|
262,061 |
|
|
|
42.87 |
|
RSUs fully vested |
|
|
(140,620 |
) |
|
|
37.25 |
|
RSUs forfeited |
|
|
(36,710 |
) |
|
|
36.29 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding RSUs at end of period |
|
|
905,621 |
|
|
$ |
37.86 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Compensation expense of $2,178 and $1,990 relating to the issuance of the RSUs has been
recognized in general and administrative expenses in the Companys unaudited condensed
consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income for the three months ended September
30, 2008 and 2007, respectively. Compensation expense of $5,930 and $5,836 relating to the
issuance of the RSUs has been recognized in general and administrative expenses in the Companys
unaudited condensed consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income for the nine
months ended September 30, 2008 and 2007, respectively. The compensation expense for the RSUs is
based on the fair market value of Holdings common shares at the time of grant. The Company has
assumed a forfeiture rate of 4.30% in determining the compensation expense over the service period.
As of September 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007, the Company has recorded $18,189 and $12,337,
respectively, in additional paid-in capital on the unaudited condensed consolidated balance
sheets in connection with the RSUs awarded.
c) Long-term incentive plan
In 2006, the Company implemented the Allied World Assurance Company Holdings, Ltd Long-Term
Incentive Plan (LTIP), which provides for performance based equity awards to key employees in
order to promote the long-term growth and profitability of the Company. Each award represents the
right to receive a number of common shares in the future, based upon the achievement of established
performance criteria during the applicable performance period. A total of 2,000,000 common shares
may be issued under the LTIP. The awards granted in 2008 will generally vest after the fiscal year
ending December 31, 2010, or in the fourth or fifth year from the original grant date, subject to
the achievement of the performance conditions and terms of the LTIP.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine months ended September 30, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Grant Date Fair |
|
|
LTIP |
|
Value |
Outstanding LTIP awards at beginning of period |
|
|
590,834 |
|
|
$ |
40.09 |
|
LTIP awards granted |
|
|
507,152 |
|
|
|
43.27 |
|
LTIP awards subjected to accelerated vesting |
|
|
(11,667 |
) |
|
|
34.00 |
|
LTIP awards forfeited |
|
|
(20,000 |
) |
|
|
43.40 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding LTIP awards at end of period |
|
|
1,066,319 |
|
|
$ |
41.61 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Compensation expense of $4,563 and $2,960 relating to the LTIP has been recognized in
general and administrative expenses in the Companys unaudited condensed consolidated statements
of operations and comprehensive income for the three months ended September 30, 2008 and 2007,
respectively. Compensation expense of $13,256 and $9,561 relating to the LTIP has been recognized
in general and administrative expenses in the Companys unaudited condensed consolidated
statements of operations and comprehensive income for the nine months ended September 30, 2008 and
2007, respectively. The compensation expense for the LTIP is based on the fair market value of
Holdings common shares at the time of grant. As of September 30, 2008 and December 31,
-15-
2007, the Company has recorded $29,643 and $16,403, respectively, in additional paid-in
capital on the unaudited condensed consolidated balance sheets in connection with the LTIP awards.
In calculating the compensation expense, and in the determination of share equivalents for the
purpose of calculating diluted earnings per share, it is estimated for the LTIP awards granted in
2006 and 2007 that the maximum performance goals as set by the LTIP are likely to be achieved over
the performance period. For the LTIP awards granted in 2008 it is estimated that the target
performance goals as set by the LTIP are likely to be achieved over the performance period. Based
on the target performance goals, the LTIP awards granted in 2008 are expensed at 100% of the fair
market value of Holdings common shares on the date of grant. The expense is recognized over the
performance period.
The following table shows the stock compensation expense relating to the stock options, RSUs
and LTIP awards for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2008 and 2007.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Stock options |
|
$ |
614 |
|
|
$ |
620 |
|
|
$ |
1,794 |
|
|
$ |
1,936 |
|
RSUs |
|
|
2,178 |
|
|
|
1,990 |
|
|
|
5,930 |
|
|
|
5,836 |
|
LTIP |
|
|
4,563 |
|
|
|
2,960 |
|
|
|
13,256 |
|
|
|
9,561 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stock compensation expense |
|
$ |
7,355 |
|
|
$ |
5,570 |
|
|
$ |
20,980 |
|
|
$ |
17,333 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11. EARNINGS PER SHARE
The following table sets forth the comparison of basic and diluted earnings per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Basic earnings per share |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (loss) income |
|
$ |
(46,367 |
) |
|
$ |
108,959 |
|
|
$ |
163,783 |
|
|
$ |
346,167 |
|
Weighted average common shares outstanding |
|
|
49,007,389 |
|
|
|
60,413,019 |
|
|
|
48,547,839 |
|
|
|
60,381,867 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic (loss) earnings per share |
|
$ |
(0.95 |
) |
|
$ |
1.80 |
|
|
$ |
3.37 |
|
|
$ |
5.73 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Diluted earnings per share |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (loss) income |
|
$ |
(46,367 |
) |
|
$ |
108,959 |
|
|
$ |
163,783 |
|
|
$ |
346,167 |
|
Weighted average common shares outstanding |
|
|
49,007,389 |
|
|
|
60,413,019 |
|
|
|
48,547,839 |
|
|
|
60,381,867 |
|
Share equivalents: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Warrants and options |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,053,905 |
|
|
|
1,233,430 |
|
|
|
1,776,360 |
|
Restricted stock units |
|
|
|
|
|
|
391,907 |
|
|
|
405,064 |
|
|
|
370,878 |
|
LTIP awards |
|
|
|
|
|
|
391,193 |
|
|
|
682,765 |
|
|
|
279,081 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average common shares and common
share equivalents outstanding diluted |
|
|
49,007,389 |
|
|
|
63,250,024 |
|
|
|
50,869,098 |
|
|
|
62,808,186 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted (loss) earnings per share |
|
$ |
(0.95 |
) |
|
$ |
1.72 |
|
|
$ |
3.22 |
|
|
$ |
5.51 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the three-month period ended September 30, 2008, no common share equivalents were included
in calculating diluted earnings per share as there was a net loss, and any additional shares would
be antidilutive. As a result, a total of 5,500,000 warrants, 1,365,351 employee stock options,
905,621 RSUs and 1,066,319 LTIP awards have been excluded from this calculation. For the
nine-month period ended September 30, 2008, a weighted average of 419,439 employee stock options
were antidilutive and were therefore excluded from the calculation of the diluted earnings per
share.
For the three-month period ended September 30, 2007, all common share equivalents were
considered dilutive and have been included in the calculation of the diluted earnings per share.
For the nine-month period ended September 30, 2007, a weighted average of 7,778 employee stock
options were antidilutive and were therefore excluded from the calculation of the diluted earnings
per share.
-16-
12. SEGMENT INFORMATION
The determination of reportable segments is based on how senior management monitors the
Companys underwriting operations. The Company measures the results of its underwriting operations
under three major business categories, namely property insurance, casualty insurance and
reinsurance. All product lines fall within these classifications.
The property segment provides direct coverage of physical property and energy-related risks.
These risks generally relate to tangible assets and are considered short-tail in that the time
from a claim being advised to the date when the claim is settled is relatively short. The casualty
segment provides direct coverage of general liability risks, professional liability risks and
healthcare risks. Such risks are long-tail in nature since the emergence and settlement of a
claim can take place many years after the policy period has expired. The reinsurance segment
includes any reinsurance of other companies in the insurance and reinsurance industries. The
Company writes reinsurance on both a treaty and facultative basis.
Responsibility and accountability for the results of underwriting operations are assigned by
major line of business on a worldwide basis. Because the Company does not manage its assets by
segment, investment income, interest expense and total assets are not allocated to individual
reportable segments.
Management measures results for each segment on the basis of the loss and loss expense
ratio, acquisition cost ratio, general and administrative expense ratio and the combined
ratio. The loss and loss expense ratio is derived by dividing net losses and loss expenses by
net premiums earned. The acquisition cost ratio is derived by dividing acquisition costs by net
premiums earned. The general and administrative expense ratio is derived by dividing general and
administrative expenses by net premiums earned. The combined ratio is the sum of the loss and
loss expense ratio, the acquisition cost ratio and the general and administrative expense ratio.
The following table provides a summary of the segment results for the three and nine months
ended September 30, 2008 and 2007.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended September 30, 2008 |
|
Property |
|
|
Casualty |
|
|
Reinsurance |
|
|
Total |
|
Gross premiums written |
|
$ |
57,437 |
|
|
$ |
140,003 |
|
|
$ |
93,541 |
|
|
$ |
290,981 |
|
Net premiums written |
|
|
35,460 |
|
|
|
106,157 |
|
|
|
92,286 |
|
|
|
233,903 |
|
Net premiums earned |
|
|
42,919 |
|
|
|
105,492 |
|
|
|
123,562 |
|
|
|
271,973 |
|
Net losses and loss expenses |
|
|
(71,243 |
) |
|
|
(46,813 |
) |
|
|
(57,954 |
) |
|
|
(176,010 |
) |
Acquisition costs |
|
|
(2,434 |
) |
|
|
(2,212 |
) |
|
|
(23,969 |
) |
|
|
(28,615 |
) |
General and administrative expenses |
|
|
(9,240 |
) |
|
|
(19,852 |
) |
|
|
(11,702 |
) |
|
|
(40,794 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Underwriting (loss) income |
|
|
(39,998 |
) |
|
|
36,615 |
|
|
|
29,937 |
|
|
|
26,554 |
|
Net investment income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
76,916 |
|
Net realized investment losses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(151,876 |
) |
Interest expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(9,515 |
) |
Foreign exchange gain |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,728 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss before income taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(55,193 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss and loss expense ratio |
|
|
166.0 |
% |
|
|
44.4 |
% |
|
|
46.9 |
% |
|
|
64.7 |
% |
Acquisition cost ratio |
|
|
5.7 |
% |
|
|
2.1 |
% |
|
|
19.4 |
% |
|
|
10.5 |
% |
General and administrative expense ratio |
|
|
21.5 |
% |
|
|
18.8 |
% |
|
|
9.5 |
% |
|
|
15.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Combined ratio |
|
|
193.2 |
% |
|
|
65.3 |
% |
|
|
75.8 |
% |
|
|
90.2 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended September 30, 2007 |
|
Property |
|
|
Casualty |
|
|
Reinsurance |
|
|
Total |
|
Gross premiums written |
|
$ |
60,192 |
|
|
$ |
122,212 |
|
|
$ |
93,849 |
|
|
$ |
276,253 |
|
Net premiums written |
|
|
32,400 |
|
|
|
92,917 |
|
|
|
93,980 |
|
|
|
219,297 |
|
Net premiums earned |
|
|
44,246 |
|
|
|
114,977 |
|
|
|
124,436 |
|
|
|
283,659 |
|
Net losses and loss expenses |
|
|
(29,271 |
) |
|
|
(71,369 |
) |
|
|
(72,606 |
) |
|
|
(173,246 |
) |
Acquisition costs |
|
|
811 |
|
|
|
(2,927 |
) |
|
|
(27,082 |
) |
|
|
(29,198 |
) |
General and administrative expenses |
|
|
(8,421 |
) |
|
|
(17,876 |
) |
|
|
(9,753 |
) |
|
|
(36,050 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Underwriting income |
|
|
7,365 |
|
|
|
22,805 |
|
|
|
14,995 |
|
|
|
45,165 |
|
Net investment income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
76,133 |
|
Net realized investment losses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,196 |
) |
Interest expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(9,481 |
) |
Foreign exchange gain |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
976 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
108,597 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss and loss expense ratio |
|
|
66.2 |
% |
|
|
62.1 |
% |
|
|
58.4 |
% |
|
|
61.1 |
% |
Acquisition cost ratio |
|
|
(1.8 |
)% |
|
|
2.5 |
% |
|
|
21.8 |
% |
|
|
10.3 |
% |
General and administrative expense ratio |
|
|
19.0 |
% |
|
|
15.6 |
% |
|
|
7.8 |
% |
|
|
12.7 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Combined ratio |
|
|
83.4 |
% |
|
|
80.2 |
% |
|
|
88.0 |
% |
|
|
84.1 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-17-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2008 |
|
Property |
|
|
Casualty |
|
|
Reinsurance |
|
|
Total |
|
Gross premiums written |
|
$ |
275,470 |
|
|
$ |
439,277 |
|
|
$ |
419,891 |
|
|
$ |
1,134,638 |
|
Net premiums written |
|
|
136,346 |
|
|
|
326,127 |
|
|
|
418,252 |
|
|
|
880,725 |
|
Net premiums earned |
|
|
130,664 |
|
|
|
320,210 |
|
|
|
363,047 |
|
|
|
813,921 |
|
Net losses and loss expenses |
|
|
(148,583 |
) |
|
|
(161,692 |
) |
|
|
(187,316 |
) |
|
|
(497,591 |
) |
Acquisition costs |
|
|
(7 |
) |
|
|
(10,711 |
) |
|
|
(71,002 |
) |
|
|
(81,720 |
) |
General and administrative expenses |
|
|
(30,697 |
) |
|
|
(67,846 |
) |
|
|
(31,902 |
) |
|
|
(130,445 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Underwriting (loss) income |
|
|
(48,623 |
) |
|
|
79,961 |
|
|
|
72,827 |
|
|
|
104,165 |
|
Net investment income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
226,192 |
|
Net realized investment losses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(152,804 |
) |
Interest expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(28,538 |
) |
Foreign exchange gain |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,651 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
151,666 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss and loss expense ratio |
|
|
113.7 |
% |
|
|
50.5 |
% |
|
|
51.6 |
% |
|
|
61.1 |
% |
Acquisition cost ratio |
|
|
0.0 |
% |
|
|
3.3 |
% |
|
|
19.6 |
% |
|
|
10.0 |
% |
General and administrative expense ratio |
|
|
23.5 |
% |
|
|
21.2 |
% |
|
|
8.8 |
% |
|
|
16.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Combined ratio |
|
|
137.2 |
% |
|
|
75.0 |
% |
|
|
80.0 |
% |
|
|
87.1 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2007 |
|
Property |
|
|
Casualty |
|
|
Reinsurance |
|
|
Total |
|
Gross premiums written |
|
$ |
318,520 |
|
|
$ |
435,492 |
|
|
$ |
491,196 |
|
|
$ |
1,245,208 |
|
Net premiums written |
|
|
137,479 |
|
|
|
335,182 |
|
|
|
491,067 |
|
|
|
963,728 |
|
Net premiums earned |
|
|
137,055 |
|
|
|
363,101 |
|
|
|
373,188 |
|
|
|
873,344 |
|
Net losses and loss expenses |
|
|
(70,285 |
) |
|
|
(222,644 |
) |
|
|
(222,537 |
) |
|
|
(515,466 |
) |
Acquisition costs |
|
|
374 |
|
|
|
(13,998 |
) |
|
|
(76,642 |
) |
|
|
(90,266 |
) |
General and administrative expenses |
|
|
(24,341 |
) |
|
|
(49,894 |
) |
|
|
(29,450 |
) |
|
|
(103,685 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Underwriting income |
|
|
42,803 |
|
|
|
76,565 |
|
|
|
44,559 |
|
|
|
163,927 |
|
Net investment income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
222,718 |
|
Net realized investment losses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(12,161 |
) |
Interest expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(28,337 |
) |
Foreign exchange gain |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
412 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
346,559 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss and loss expense ratio |
|
|
51.3 |
% |
|
|
61.3 |
% |
|
|
59.6 |
% |
|
|
59.0 |
% |
Acquisition cost ratio |
|
|
(0.3 |
)% |
|
|
3.9 |
% |
|
|
20.5 |
% |
|
|
10.3 |
% |
General and administrative expense ratio |
|
|
17.8 |
% |
|
|
13.7 |
% |
|
|
7.9 |
% |
|
|
11.9 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Combined ratio |
|
|
68.8 |
% |
|
|
78.9 |
% |
|
|
88.0 |
% |
|
|
81.2 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-18-
The following table shows an analysis of the Companys net premiums written by geographic
location of the Companys subsidiaries for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2008 and
2007.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Bermuda |
|
$ |
113,301 |
|
|
$ |
156,166 |
|
|
$ |
567,865 |
|
|
$ |
749,248 |
|
United States |
|
|
87,432 |
|
|
|
34,529 |
|
|
|
189,790 |
|
|
|
91,642 |
|
Europe |
|
|
33,170 |
|
|
|
28,602 |
|
|
|
123,070 |
|
|
|
122,838 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total net premiums written |
|
$ |
233,903 |
|
|
$ |
219,297 |
|
|
$ |
880,725 |
|
|
$ |
963,728 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13. COMMITMENTS AND SUBSEQUENT EVENTS
On November 6, 2008, the Company declared a quarterly dividend of $0.18 per common share,
payable on December 11, 2008 to shareholders of record on November 25, 2008.
Holdings entered into a definitive agreement and plan of merger (the Merger Agreement) on
June 27, 2008 with Allied World Merger Company, a newly formed Delaware corporation and an indirect
wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company (Merger Sub), and Darwin Professional Underwriters, Inc.,
a Delaware corporation (Darwin). The Merger Agreement provided for the merger of Merger Sub with
and into Darwin, with Darwin continuing as the surviving corporation and an indirect wholly-owned
subsidiary of Holdings. Darwin is a holding company whose subsidiaries are engaged in the
executive and professional liability insurance business with an
emphasis on coverage for the
healthcare industry. The transaction was completed on October 20, 2008 and has been accounted for
as a purchase. Under the purchase method of accounting for a business combination, the assets and
liabilities of Darwin will be recorded at their fair values on the acquisition date.
Pursuant to the terms of the Merger Agreement, stockholders of Darwin received $32.00 in cash
for each share of Darwin common stock in exchange for 100% of their interests in Darwin. Also,
each outstanding Darwin stock option became fully vested and was converted into an amount in cash
equal to (i) the excess, if any, of $32.00 over the exercise price per share of the stock option,
multiplied by (ii) the total number of shares of Darwin common stock subject to the stock option.
In addition, each outstanding Darwin restricted share became fully vested and was converted into
the right to receive $32.00 in cash per restricted share, and each outstanding director share unit
was converted into the right to receive $32.00 in cash per share unit. The total cash
consideration paid by the Company was $550,122, excluding direct costs of the acquisition, and was
paid with available capital.
The following table shows Darwins unaudited selected financial data for the three and nine
months ended September 30, 2008.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months |
|
Nine months |
|
|
ended |
|
ended |
|
|
September 30, |
|
September 30, |
|
|
2008 |
|
2008 |
Gross premiums written |
|
$ |
71,453 |
|
|
$ |
215,489 |
|
Net premiums written |
|
|
56,383 |
|
|
|
165,510 |
|
Net premiums earned |
|
|
54,454 |
|
|
|
161,365 |
|
Net investment income |
|
|
6,272 |
|
|
|
18,271 |
|
Net realized investment losses |
|
|
2,714 |
|
|
|
3,329 |
|
Net losses and loss expenses |
|
|
23,535 |
|
|
|
64,152 |
|
Acquisition costs and general and administrative expenses(1) |
|
|
24,240 |
|
|
|
54,516 |
|
Net income(1) |
|
|
5,532 |
|
|
|
33,855 |
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Included in Darwins acquisition costs and general and administrative expenses for
the three and nine months September 30, 2008 was $8,470 and $9,663, respectively, of costs incurred
by Darwin for external advisory and other fees directly related to the acquisition. |
During September 2008, the Company submitted redemption requests for its hedge fund
investments in Goldman Sachs Multi-Strategy VI, Ltd (the Portfolio VI Fund) and AIG Select Hedge
Ltd. (the AIG Select Fund). The Company is the sole investor in the Portfolio VI Fund and the
market value of this fund was $65,501 as of September 30, 2008. The market value of the AIG Select
Fund was $62,595 as of September 30, 2008.
-19-
Item 2. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.
The following discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations
should be read in conjunction with our condensed consolidated financial statements and related
notes included elsewhere in this Form 10-Q. References in this Form 10-Q to the terms we, us,
our, the company or other similar terms mean the consolidated operations of Allied World
Assurance Company Holdings, Ltd and its subsidiaries, unless the context requires otherwise.
References in this Form 10-Q to the term Holdings means Allied World Assurance Company Holdings,
Ltd only.
Note on Forward-Looking Statement
This Form 10-Q and other publicly available documents may include, and our officers and
representatives may from time to time make, projections concerning financial information and
statements concerning future economic performance and events, plans and objectives relating to
management, operations, products and services, and assumptions underlying these projections and
statements. These projections and statements are forward-looking statements within the meaning of
The Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 and are not historical facts but instead
represent only our belief regarding future events, many of which, by their nature, are inherently
uncertain and outside our control. These projections and statements may address, among other
things, our strategy for growth, product development, financial results and reserves. Actual
results and financial condition may differ, possibly materially, from these projections and
statements and therefore you should not place undue reliance on them. Factors that could cause our
actual results to differ, possibly materially, from those in the specific projections and
statements are discussed throughout this Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations and in Risk Factors in Item 1A of Part I of our 2007 Annual
Report on Form 10-K filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) on February 29,
2008. We are under no obligation (and expressly disclaim any such obligation) to update or revise
any forward-looking statement that may be made from time to time, whether as a result of new
information, future developments or otherwise.
Overview
Our Business
We write a diversified portfolio of property and casualty insurance and reinsurance lines of
business internationally through our subsidiaries or branches based in Bermuda, the United States,
Ireland, Switzerland and the United Kingdom. We manage our business through three operating
segments: property, casualty and reinsurance. As of September 30, 2008, we had $8.1 billion of
total assets, $2.3 billion of shareholders equity and $2.8 billion of total capital, which
includes shareholders equity and senior notes.
During the year ended December 31, 2007, we experienced rate declines from increased
competition across all of our operating segments. This trend of increased competition and
decreasing rates has continued during the nine months ended September 30, 2008, and we expect this
trend to continue during the remainder of 2008. Given this trend, we continue to be selective in
the policies and reinsurance contracts we underwrite. Our consolidated gross premiums written
increased $14.7 million, or 5.3%, for the three months ended September 30, 2008 compared to the
three months ended September 30, 2007. Our consolidated gross premiums decreased $110.6 million,
or 8.9%, for the nine months ended September 30, 2008 compared to the nine months ended September
30, 2007. Our net income for the three months ended September 30, 2008 decreased $155.4 million,
or 142.6%, to a net loss of $46.4 million compared to net income of $109.0 million for the three
months ended September 30, 2007. During the three months ended September 30, 2008, we were
negatively impacted by net losses and loss expenses recognized of $71.6 million related to
Hurricanes Ike and Gustav, as well as realized investment losses, including other-than-temporary
charges, of $151.9 million. Our net income for the nine months ended September 30, 2008 decreased
$182.4 million, or 52.7%, to $163.8 million compared to $346.2 million for the nine months ended
September 30, 2007.
Recent Developments
On June 27, 2008, we entered into a definitive merger agreement to acquire Darwin Professional
Underwriters, Inc. (Darwin). Darwin is a holding company
whose subsidiaries are engaged in the executive and professional
liability insurance business with an emphasis on coverage for the
healthcare industry. The transaction was completed on October 20, 2008 and has been accounted for as a
purchase. Under the purchase method of accounting for a business combination, the assets and
liabilities of Darwin were recorded at their fair values on the acquisition date. Under the terms
of the merger agreement, stockholders of Darwin received $32.00 per share in cash for each share of
Darwin common stock in exchange for 100% of their interests in Darwin. Also, each outstanding
Darwin stock option became fully vested and was
-20-
converted into an amount in cash equal to (i) the excess, if any, of $32.00 over the exercise
price per share of the stock option, multiplied by (ii) the total number of shares of Darwin common
stock subject to the stock option. In addition, each outstanding Darwin restricted share became
fully vested and was converted into the right to receive $32.00 in cash per restricted share, and
each outstanding director share unit was converted to receive $32.00 in cash per share unit. The
total cash consideration paid was $550.1 million, excluding direct costs of the acquisition, and
was paid with available capital.
During the past several months, there has been significant turmoil in the U.S. and
international financial markets. The ability to borrow funds has become limited as there has been
a general lock-up of liquidity. The recent events have impacted us in two significant ways. The
first is the lack of liquidity, which has reduced the fair value of our overall investment
portfolio since June 30, 2008. The market for certain securities has become inactive, which has
made pricing certain securities difficult and which has had the effect of lowering the fair value
of our investment portfolio. Approximately 99% of our fixed income investments (which included
individually held securities and securities held in a global high-yield bond fund) consisted of
investment grade securities, whose average credit rating is AA+ as rated by Standard & Poors. Our
investment portfolio does not include any real estate, collateralized debt obligations,
collateralized loan obligations, direct investment in common equities or other complex financial
structures. Our investment portfolio has no transactions that require the posting of collateral.
While we have taken significant net realized losses of $151.9 million from the sale of fixed income
securities, mark-to-market adjustments on our hedge fund investments and other-than-temporary
impairment charges during the three months ended September 30, 2008, we believe that our investment
portfolio remains well diversified, conservative and of high quality. The second significant
impact that the recent events have had on us, as well as others in the industry, is the ability to
raise additional capital if necessary given the current market
conditions. However, we have a credit
facility with a syndication of 13 lenders that is comprised of a secured credit facility and an
unsecured credit facility. We currently have the ability to draw up to $400 million from our
unsecured credit facility. For more information on our credit facility, please see Liquidity
and Capital Resources Restrictions and Specific Requirements.
Relevant Factors
Revenues
We derive our revenues primarily from premiums on our insurance policies and reinsurance
contracts, net of any reinsurance or retrocessional coverage purchased. Insurance and reinsurance
premiums are a function of the amounts and types of policies and contracts we write, as well as
prevailing market prices. Our prices are determined before our ultimate costs, which may extend far
into the future, are known. In addition, our revenues include income generated from our investment
portfolio, consisting of net investment income and net realized gains or losses. Investment income
is principally derived from interest and dividends earned on investments, partially offset by
investment management fees and fees paid to our custodian bank. Net realized gains or losses
include (1) net realized investment gains or losses from the sale of investments, (2) write-downs
related to declines in the market value of securities on our available for sale portfolio that were
considered to be other than temporary and (3) the change in the fair value of investments that we
mark-to-market in the consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income.
Expenses
Our
expenses consist largely of net losses and loss expenses, acquisition
costs and general and administrative expenses. Net losses and loss
expenses incurred are comprised of three main components:
|
|
|
losses paid, which are actual cash payments to insureds or losses payable to insureds,
net of recoveries from reinsurers; |
|
|
|
|
outstanding loss or case reserves, which represent managements best estimate of the
likely settlement amount for known claims, less the portion that can be recovered from
reinsurers; and |
|
|
|
|
reserves for losses incurred but not reported, or IBNR, which are reserves established
by us for claims that are not yet reported but can reasonably be expected to have occurred
based on industry information, managements experience and/or actuarial evaluation. The
portion recoverable from reinsurers is deducted from the gross estimated loss. |
Acquisition costs are comprised of commissions, brokerage fees and insurance taxes.
Commissions and brokerage fees are usually calculated as a percentage of premiums and depend on the
market and line of business. Acquisition costs are reported after (1) deducting commissions
received on ceded reinsurance, (2) deducting the part of acquisition costs relating to unearned
premiums and (3) including the amortization of previously deferred acquisition costs.
-21-
General and administrative expenses include personnel expenses including stock-based
compensation charges, rent expense, professional fees, information technology costs and other
general operating expenses. We are experiencing increases in general and administrative expenses
resulting from additional staff, increased stock-based compensation expense, increased rent expense
for our U.S. offices, increased professional fees and additional amortization expense for
building-related and infrastructure expenditures. We believe this trend will continue during the
remainder of 2008 as we continue to hire additional staff and build our infrastructure.
Ratios
Management measures results for each segment on the basis of the loss and loss expense
ratio, acquisition cost ratio, general and administrative expense ratio, expense ratio and
the combined ratio. Because we do not manage our assets by segment, investment income, interest
expense and total assets are not allocated to individual reportable segments. General and
administrative expenses are allocated to segments based on various factors, including staff count
and each segments proportional share of gross premiums written. The loss and loss expense ratio
is derived by dividing net losses and loss expenses by net premiums earned. The acquisition cost
ratio is derived by dividing acquisition costs by net premiums earned. The general and
administrative expense ratio is derived by dividing general and administrative expenses by net
premiums earned. The expense ratio is the sum of the acquisition cost ratio and the general and
administrative expense ratio. The combined ratio is the sum of the loss and loss expense ratio,
the acquisition cost ratio and the general and administrative expense ratio.
Critical Accounting Policies
It is important to understand our accounting policies in order to understand our financial
position and results of operations. Our unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements
reflect determinations that are inherently subjective in nature and require management to make
assumptions and best estimates to determine the reported values. If events or other factors cause
actual results to differ materially from managements underlying assumptions or estimates, there
could be a material adverse effect on our financial condition or results of operations. We believe
that some of the more critical judgments in the areas of accounting estimates and assumptions that
affect our financial condition and results of operations are related to reserves for losses and
loss expenses, reinsurance recoverables, premiums and acquisition costs, valuation of financial
instruments and other-than-temporary impairment of investments. For a detailed discussion of our
critical accounting policies please refer to our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2007 filed with the SEC. There were no material changes in the application of our
critical accounting estimates subsequent to that report, except as discussed below related to the
valuation of financial instruments.
Fair Value of Financial Instruments
Under existing accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (U.S. GAAP), we
are required to recognize certain assets at their fair value in our condensed consolidated balance
sheets. This includes our fixed maturity investments, global high-yield bond fund and hedge funds.
Fair value, as defined in Financial Accounting Standard No. 157 Fair Value Measurements (FAS
157), is the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an
orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. FAS 157 also established
a three-level valuation hierarchy for disclosure of fair value measurements. The valuation
hierarchy is based upon whether the inputs to the valuation of an asset or liability are observable
or unobservable in the market at the measurement date, with quoted market prices being the highest
level (Level 1) and unobservable inputs being the lowest level (Level 3). A fair value measurement
will fall within the level of the hierarchy based on the input that is significant to determining
such measurement. The three levels are defined as follows:
|
|
|
Level 1: Observable inputs to the valuation methodology that are quoted prices
(unadjusted) for identical assets or liabilities in active markets. |
|
|
|
|
Level 2: Observable inputs to the valuation methodology other than quoted market prices
(unadjusted) for identical assets or liabilities in active markets. Level 2 inputs include
quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets, quoted prices for
identical assets in markets that are not active and inputs other than quoted prices that
are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly, for substantially
the full term of the asset or liability. |
|
|
|
|
Level 3: Inputs to the valuation methodology that are unobservable for the asset or
liability. |
At each measurement date, we estimate the fair value of the financial instruments using
various valuation techniques. We utilize, to the extent available, quoted market prices in active
markets or observable market inputs in estimating the fair value of our financial instruments.
When quoted market prices or observable market inputs are not available, we utilize valuation
techniques that rely on unobservable inputs to estimate the fair value of financial instruments.
The following describes the valuation techniques we used to
-22-
determine the fair value of financial instruments held as of September 30, 2008 and what level
within the FAS 157 fair value hierarchy the valuation technique resides.
U.S. government and U.S. government agencies: Comprised primarily of bonds issued by the U.S.
Treasury, the Federal Home Loan Bank, the Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation and the Federal
National Mortgage Association. The fair values of U.S. government securities are based on quoted
market prices in active markets, and are included in the Level 1 fair value hierarchy. We believe
the market for U.S. Treasury securities is an actively traded market given the high level of daily
trading volume. The fair values of U.S. government agency securities are priced using the spread
above the risk-free yield curve. As the yields for the risk-free yield curve are observable market
inputs, the fair values of U.S. government agency securities are included in the Level 2 fair value
hierarchy.
Non-U.S. government and government agencies: Comprised of fixed income obligations of
non-U.S. governmental entities. The fair values of these securities are based on prices obtained
from broker/dealers and international indices, and are included in the Level 2 fair value
hierarchy.
Corporate: Comprised of bonds issued by corporations that on acquisition are rated BBB-/Baa3
or higher provided that, in aggregate, corporate bonds with ratings of BBB-/Baa3 do not constitute
more than 5% of the market value of our fixed income securities, and are diversified across a wide
range of issuers and industries. The fair values of corporate bonds that are short-term are priced
using the spread above the London Interbank Offering Rate yield curve, and the fair value of
corporate bonds that are long-term are priced using the spread above the risk-free yield curve.
The spreads are sourced from broker/dealers, trade prices and the new
issue market. As the significant inputs
used to price corporate bonds are observable market inputs, the fair values of corporate bonds are
included in the Level 2 fair value hierarchy.
States, municipalities and political subdivisions: Comprised of fixed income obligations of
U.S. domiciled state and municipality entities. The fair values of
these securities are based on prices obtained from broker/dealers and the new issue market, and are included in the Level 2 fair value hierarchy.
Mortgage-backed: Principally comprised of AAA-rated pools of residential and commercial
mortgages originated by both agency (such as the Federal National Mortgage Association) and
non-agency originators. The fair values of mortgage-backed securities originated by U.S.
government agencies and non-U.S. government agencies are based on a pricing model that incorporates
prepayment speeds and spreads to determine appropriate average life of mortgage-backed securities.
The spreads are sourced from broker/dealers trade prices and the new issue market. As the
significant inputs used to price the mortgage-backed securities are observable market inputs, the
fair values of these securities are included in the Level 2 fair value hierarchy.
Asset-backed: Comprised of primarily AAA-rated bonds backed by pools of automobile loan
receivables, home equity loans and credit card receivables originated by a variety of financial
institutions. The fair values of asset-backed securities are priced using prepayment speed and
spread inputs that are sourced from the new issue market. As the significant inputs used to price
the asset-backed securities are observable market inputs, the fair values of these securities are
included in the Level 2 fair value hierarchy.
Other invested assets available for sale: Comprised of an open-end global high-yield bond
fund that invests in non-investment grade bonds issued by various issuers and industries. The fair
value of the global high-yield bond fund is based on the net asset value as reported by the fund
manager. The net asset value is an observable input as it is quoted on a market exchange on a
daily basis. The fair value of the global high-yield bond fund is included in the Level 2 fair
value hierarchy.
Other invested assets, at fair value: Comprised of four hedge funds invested in a range of
diversified strategies. The fair values of the hedge funds are based on the net asset value of the
funds as reported by the fund manager less a liquidity discount where hedge fund investments
contain lock-up provisions that prevent immediate dissolution. We consider these lock-up
provisions to be obligations that market participants would assign a value to in determining the
price of these hedge funds, and as such have considered these obligations in determining the fair
value measurement of the related hedge funds. The liquidity discount was estimated by calculating
the value of a protective put over the lock-up period. The protective put measures the risk of
holding a restricted asset over a certain time period. We used the Black-Scholes option-pricing
model to estimate the value of the protective put for each hedge fund. The aggregate liquidity
discount recorded during the three months ended September 30, 2008 was not significant and $0.2
million for the nine months ended September 30, 2008. The net asset value and the liquidity
discount are significant unobservable inputs, and as such the fair values of the hedge funds are
included in the Level 3 fair value hierarchy. Our hedge funds are the only assets that have
significant Level 3 inputs in determining fair value and represent 3.0% of our total investments.
-23-
The following table shows the pricing sources of our fixed maturity investments held as of
September 30, 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed Maturity |
|
|
Percentage of |
|
|
SFAS 157 Fair |
|
|
|
Investments as of |
|
|
Total Fixed |
|
|
Value |
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
Maturity |
|
|
Hierarchy |
|
Pricing Sources |
|
2008 |
|
|
Investments |
|
|
Level |
|
Lehman Brothers Index |
|
$ |
3,869.3 |
|
|
|
71.2 |
% |
|
1 and 2 |
|
Interactive Data Pricing |
|
|
665.0 |
|
|
|
12.2 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
Reuters pricing service |
|
|
552.0 |
|
|
|
10.2 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
International indices |
|
|
84.8 |
|
|
|
1.6 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
Other (including broker/dealers) |
|
|
262.2 |
|
|
|
4.8 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
5,433.3 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
Lehman Brothers Index: We use the Lehman Brothers Index to price our U.S. government, U.S.
government agencies, corporate, agency and non-agency mortgage-backed and asset-backed securities.
There are several observable inputs that the Lehman Brothers Index uses in determining its prices,
which include among others, treasury yields, new issuance and secondary trades, information
provided by broker/dealers, security cash flows and structures, sector and issuer level spreads,
credit rating, underlying collateral and prepayment speeds. For U.S. government securities,
traders that act as market makers are the primary source of pricing. As such, for U.S. government
securities we believe the Lehman Brothers Index reflects quoted prices (unadjusted) for identical
securities in active markets.
Interactive Data Pricing: We use Interactive Data Pricing to price our U.S. government
agencies, municipalities, non-agency mortgage-backed and asset-backed securities. There are several
observable inputs that Interactive Data Pricing uses in determining its prices, which include among
others, benchmark yields, reported trades and issuer spreads.
Reuters pricing service: We use the Reuters pricing service to price our U.S. government
agencies, corporate, agency and non-agency mortgage-backed and asset-backed securities. There are
several observable inputs that the Reuters pricing service uses in determining its prices, which
include among others, option-adjusted spreads, treasury yields, new issuance and secondary trades,
sector and issuer level spreads, underlying collateral and prepayment speeds.
International indices: We use international indices, which include the FTSE, Deutche Teleborse
and the Scotia Index, to price our non-U.S. government and government agencies securities. The
observable inputs used by international indices to determine its prices are based on new issuance
and secondary trades and information provided by broker/dealers.
Other (including broker/dealers): We also utilize, to a lesser extent, other pricing services
including broker/dealers to price our U.S. government agencies, corporate, municipalities, agency
and non-agency mortgage-backed and asset-backed securities. The pricing sources include JP Morgan
Securities Inc., Merrill Lynch & Co. and other broker/dealers and Standards & Poors.
To validate the prices obtained from the above pricing sources, which are our primary sources
of prices, we also obtain prices from our investment portfolio
managers, and compare the prices
obtained from the above pricing sources to those obtained from our investment portfolio managers.
We investigate any differences between the two sources and determine which price best reflects the
fair value of the individual security. There were no material differences between the prices from
the above sources and the prices obtained from our investment
portfolio managers as of September 30,
2008. In addition, all the pricing sources that we utilize have their own due-diligence procedures
to ensure the price used for a particular security is based on observable inputs and reflects the
best available information.
There have been no material changes to any of our valuation techniques from those used as of
December 31, 2007. We have still been able to obtain observable market inputs for our investments,
despite the market conditions that existed as of September 30, 2008. Based on all reasonably
available information received, we believe the prices that were obtained from inactive markets were
orderly transactions, and therefore, reflected the current price a market participant would pay for
the asset. We based our determination of whether a market is active or inactive based on the
spread between what a seller is asking for a security and what a buyer is bidding for that
security. Spreads that are significantly above historical spreads are considered inactive markets.
We also consider the volume of trading activity in our determination of whether a market is active
or inactive. Since fair valuing a financial instrument is an estimate of what a willing buyer
would pay for our asset if we sold it, we will not know the ultimate value of our financial
instruments
-24-
until they are sold. We believe the valuation techniques utilized provide us with the best
estimate of the price that would be received to sell our assets in an orderly transaction between
participants at the measurement date.
Results of Operations
The following table sets forth our selected consolidated statement of operations data for each
of the periods indicated.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
($ in millions) |
|
Gross premiums written |
|
$ |
291.0 |
|
|
$ |
276.3 |
|
|
$ |
1,134.6 |
|
|
$ |
1,245.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net premiums written |
|
$ |
233.9 |
|
|
$ |
219.3 |
|
|
$ |
880.7 |
|
|
$ |
963.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net premiums earned |
|
|
272.0 |
|
|
|
283.7 |
|
|
|
813.9 |
|
|
|
873.3 |
|
Net investment income |
|
|
76.9 |
|
|
|
76.1 |
|
|
|
226.2 |
|
|
|
222.7 |
|
Net realized investment losses |
|
|
(151.9 |
) |
|
|
(4.2 |
) |
|
|
(152.8 |
) |
|
|
(12.1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
197.0 |
|
|
$ |
355.6 |
|
|
$ |
887.3 |
|
|
$ |
1,083.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net losses and loss expenses |
|
$ |
176.0 |
|
|
$ |
173.2 |
|
|
$ |
497.6 |
|
|
$ |
515.5 |
|
Acquisition costs |
|
|
28.6 |
|
|
|
29.2 |
|
|
|
81.7 |
|
|
|
90.2 |
|
General and administrative expenses |
|
|
40.8 |
|
|
|
36.1 |
|
|
|
130.5 |
|
|
|
103.7 |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
9.5 |
|
|
|
9.5 |
|
|
|
28.5 |
|
|
|
28.3 |
|
Foreign exchange gain |
|
|
(2.7 |
) |
|
|
(1.0 |
) |
|
|
(2.7 |
) |
|
|
(0.4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
252.2 |
|
|
$ |
247.0 |
|
|
$ |
735.6 |
|
|
$ |
737.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Loss) income before income taxes |
|
$ |
(55.2 |
) |
|
$ |
108.6 |
|
|
$ |
151.7 |
|
|
$ |
346.6 |
|
Income tax (recovery) expense |
|
|
(8.8 |
) |
|
|
(0.4 |
) |
|
|
(12.1 |
) |
|
|
0.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (loss) income |
|
$ |
(46.4 |
) |
|
$ |
109.0 |
|
|
$ |
163.8 |
|
|
$ |
346.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ratios |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss and loss expense ratio |
|
|
64.7 |
% |
|
|
61.1 |
% |
|
|
61.1 |
% |
|
|
59.0 |
% |
Acquisition cost ratio |
|
|
10.5 |
|
|
|
10.3 |
|
|
|
10.0 |
|
|
|
10.3 |
|
General and administrative expense ratio |
|
|
15.0 |
|
|
|
12.7 |
|
|
|
16.0 |
|
|
|
11.9 |
|
Expense ratio |
|
|
25.5 |
|
|
|
23.0 |
|
|
|
26.0 |
|
|
|
22.2 |
|
Combined ratio |
|
|
90.2 |
|
|
|
84.1 |
|
|
|
87.1 |
|
|
|
81.2 |
|
Comparison of Three Months Ended September 30, 2008 and 2007
Premiums
Gross premiums written increased by $14.7 million, or 5.3%, for the three months ended
September 30, 2008 compared to the three months ended September 30, 2007. The increase in gross
premiums written was primarily the result of the following:
|
|
|
In our casualty segment, our gross premiums written increased by $17.8 million,
primarily due to increased gross premiums written by our U.S. offices. Gross premiums
written by our U.S. offices increased by $12.4 million, or 32.1%, for the three months
ended September 30, 2008 compared to the three months ended September 30, 2007. |
|
|
|
|
In our reinsurance segment, adjustments on estimated premiums were higher by $1.7
million during the three months ended September 30, 2008 compared to the three months
ended September 30, 2007. We recognized net upward adjustments of $2.8 million during
the three months ended September 30, 2008 compared to net upward adjustments of $1.1
million during the three months ended September 30, 2007. We also recognized $2.7
million in reinstatement premiums related to Hurricane Ike during the three months ended
September 30, 2008. |
|
|
|
|
Offsetting the increased gross premiums written in our casualty segment was the
continued trend of the non-renewal of business that did not meet our underwriting
requirements (which included inadequate pricing and/or policy or contract terms and
conditions), increased competition and inadequate pricing for new business in each of our
operating segments. This included our reducing the amount of gross premiums written in
our energy line of business within our property segment by $8.0 million, or 44.4%, and
reducing the amount of gross premiums written for certain energy classes of business
within our casualty segment by $1.6 million in response to deteriorating market
conditions. |
-25-
The table below illustrates our gross premiums written by geographic locations for the three
months ended September 30, 2008 and 2007.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
Dollar |
|
|
Percentage |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
Change |
|
|
Change |
|
|
|
($ in millions) |
|
Bermuda |
|
$ |
137.6 |
|
|
$ |
181.2 |
|
|
$ |
(43.6 |
) |
|
|
(24.1 |
)% |
United States |
|
|
106.6 |
|
|
|
51.9 |
|
|
|
54.7 |
|
|
|
105.4 |
|
Europe |
|
|
46.8 |
|
|
|
43.2 |
|
|
|
3.6 |
|
|
|
8.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
291.0 |
|
|
$ |
276.3 |
|
|
$ |
14.7 |
|
|
|
5.3 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The decrease in gross premiums written for our Bermuda operations, in addition to the
continued trend of the non-renewal of business that did not meet our underwriting requirements
(which included inadequate pricing and/or policy or contract terms and conditions), increased
competition and inadequate pricing for new business was due to the fact that certain policies and
treaties that were previously written in Bermuda during the three months ended September 30, 2007
were renewed in one of our U.S. companies during the three months ended September 30, 2008. Our
U.S. reinsurance company commenced operations in April 2008 and renewed treaties previously written
in Bermuda of $17.6 million during the three months ended September 30, 2008.
Net premiums written increased by $14.6 million, or 6.7%, for the three months ended September
30, 2008 compared to the three months ended September 30, 2007. The difference between gross and
net premiums written is the cost to us of purchasing reinsurance, both on a proportional and a
non-proportional basis, including the cost of property catastrophe reinsurance coverage. We ceded
19.6% of gross premiums written for the three months ended September 30, 2008 compared to 20.6% for
the same period in 2007. The decrease in the percentage of premiums ceded was caused by a
reduction in the cession percentage on our general property quota share reinsurance treaty from 55%
to 40%, partially offset by the purchase of an additional property catastrophe excess-of-loss
reinsurance treaty for our general property business with a limit of $75 million excess of $50
million, of which 25% was placed with external reinsurers and the remainder was retained by us.
This excess-of-loss reinsurance treaty covers property damage within the United States and Canada
caused by a named windstorm and has a term from July 1, 2008 to November 30, 2008. The total ceded
premiums written for this excess-of-loss treaty were $2.5 million. There was no such additional
property catastrophe excess-of-loss treaty in place during the three months ended September 30,
2007.
Net premiums earned decreased by $11.7 million, or 4.1%, for the three months ended September
30, 2008 compared to the three months ended September 30, 2007 due to the continued earning of
lower net premiums that were written prior to the three months ended September 30, 2008.
-26-
We evaluate our business by segment, distinguishing between property insurance, casualty
insurance and reinsurance. The following chart illustrates the mix of our business on both a gross
premiums written and net premiums earned basis.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross |
|
Net |
|
|
Premiums |
|
Premiums |
|
|
Written |
|
Earned |
|
|
Three Months Ended September 30, |
|
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
Property |
|
|
19.7 |
% |
|
|
21.8 |
% |
|
|
15.8 |
% |
|
|
15.6 |
% |
Casualty |
|
|
48.1 |
|
|
|
44.2 |
|
|
|
38.8 |
|
|
|
40.5 |
|
Reinsurance |
|
|
32.2 |
|
|
|
34.0 |
|
|
|
45.4 |
|
|
|
43.9 |
|
The increase in the percentage of casualty gross premiums written reflects the continued
growth of our U.S. operations discussed above.
Net Investment Income and Realized Investment Losses
Net investment income increased by $0.8 million, or 1.1%, for the three months ended September
30, 2008 compared to the three months ended September 30, 2007. The increase was primarily the
result of a dividend received from one of our hedge funds. The annualized period book yield of the
investment portfolio for both the three months ended September 30, 2008 and 2007 was 4.7%.
Investment management fees of $1.8 million and $1.6 million were incurred during the three months
ended September 30, 2008 and 2007, respectively.
As of September 30, 2008, approximately 99% of our fixed income investments (which included
individually held securities and securities held in a global high-yield bond fund) consisted of
investment grade securities. The average credit rating of our fixed income portfolio was AA+ as
rated by Standard & Poors and Aa1 as rated by Moodys Investors Service, with an average duration
of approximately 3.4 years as of September 30, 2008.
Net realized investment losses increased by $147.7 million for the three months ended
September 30, 2008 compared to the three months ended September 30, 2007. Net realized investment
losses of $151.9 million for the three months ended September 30, 2008 were comprised of the
following:
|
|
|
A write-down of approximately $75.0 million related to declines in the market value
of securities in our available for sale portfolio that were considered to be other than
temporary. The declines in the market value of these securities were primarily due to
the write-down of residential and commercial mortgage-backed securities and corporate
bonds due to the widening of credit spreads caused by the continued decline in the U.S.
housing market and the current turmoil in the financial markets. An
other-than-temporary charge was recognized for those securities in an
unrealized loss position that our investment advisers had the
discretion to sell. The following shows the other-than-temporary charge for our fixed maturity
investments by category: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other-than-temporary charges |
|
|
|
for the three months ended |
|
|
|
September 30, 2008 |
|
|
|
($ in millions) |
|
U.S. government and government agencies |
|
$ |
10.3 |
|
Non-U.S. government and government agencies |
|
|
0.2 |
|
Corporate |
|
|
44.3 |
|
States, municipalities and political subdivisions |
|
|
0.3 |
|
Mortgage backed |
|
|
18.2 |
|
Asset backed |
|
|
1.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total
other-than-temporary-impairment charges |
|
$ |
75.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net realized investment losses of $27.6 million related to the mark-to-market of our
hedge fund investments. The net realized losses were due to the overall volatility of
the financial markets. On January 1, 2008, we adopted Statement of |
-27-
|
|
|
Financial Accounting Standards No. 159 The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and
Financial Liabilities Including an amendment of FASB Statement No. 115 (FAS 159) and
elected to fair value our hedge fund investments. As a result, any change in the fair
value of our hedge fund investments is recognized as realized investment gains or losses
in the condensed consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income at each
reporting period. As we adopted FAS 159 in 2008, there were no realized investment gains
or losses recognized from our hedge fund investments in the unaudited condensed
consolidated statement of operations and comprehensive income during the three months
ended September 30, 2007 as the change in fair value was included in accumulated other
comprehensive income in the unaudited condensed consolidated balance sheet. |
|
|
|
|
Net realized investment losses of $49.2 million from the sale of securities. These
investment losses included realized losses from the sale of our investments in Lehman
Brothers Holding Ltd bonds of $45.0 million, Morgan Stanley bonds of $15.0 million and
Washington Mutual, Inc. bonds of $1.7 million, in addition to realized gains from the
sale of other securities. |
During the three months ended September 30, 2007, we recognized $4.2 million in net realized
losses on investments, which included (i) a write-down of approximately $25.4 million related to
declines in the market value of securities in our available for sale portfolio that were considered
to be other than temporary and (ii) net realized gains from the sale of securities of $21.2
million. Included in the other-than-temporary-impairment charge for the three months ended
September 30, 2007 was a charge of $23.9 million for our investment in the Goldman Sachs Global
Alpha Hedge Fund PLC. As of September 30, 2007, our basis in the fund was $57.5 million and the
fair value was $33.6 million, resulting in a loss of $23.9 million. We reviewed our carrying value
of the investment in light of the significant changes in economic conditions that occurred during
the third quarter of 2007, which included subprime mortgage exposure, tightening of credit spreads
and overall market volatility. These economic conditions caused the fair value of our investment to
decline. The remaining write-downs of $1.5 million were solely due to changes in interest rates.
Net Losses and Loss Expenses
Net losses and loss expenses increased by $2.8 million, or 1.6%, for the three months ended
September 30, 2008 compared to the three months ended September 30, 2007. The increase in net
losses and loss expenses was due to higher than expected loss activity in the current period, which
included net losses and loss expenses incurred from Hurricanes Ike and Gustav of $62.0 million and
$9.6 million, respectively. Of the total net losses and loss expenses incurred for Hurricanes Ike
and Gustav, $49.3 million was recognized in our property segment and $22.3 million was recognized
in our reinsurance segment. Our loss estimate is derived from preliminary claims information
obtained from clients and brokers, a review of the terms of in-force policies and contracts and
catastrophe modeling analysis. Our actual losses from these events may vary materially from the
current estimate due to inherent uncertainties resulting from several factors, including the
preliminary nature of available information, potential inaccuracies and inadequacies in the data
provided by clients and brokers, potential catastrophe modeling inaccuracies, the contingent nature
of business interruption exposures, the effects of any resultant demand surge on claims activity
and attendant coverage issues. The increased loss activity in the current period was partially
offset by net favorable prior year loss development during the three months ended September 30,
2008 compared to the three months ended September 30, 2007.
We recorded net favorable reserve development related to prior years of approximately $96.9
million and $28.5 million during the three months ended September 30, 2008 and 2007, respectively.
The following is a breakdown of the major factors contributing to the net favorable reserve
development for the three months ended September 30, 2008:
|
|
|
Net favorable reserve development of $24.7 million was recognized by our property
segment, which consisted of $6.7 million of net favorable reserve development for the 2004
and 2005 windstorms and $18.0 million of net favorable reserve development due to actual
loss emergence being lower than the initial expected loss emergence for the 2003 through
2005 and 2007 loss years for our general property line of business. |
|
|
|
|
Net favorable reserve development of $32.8 million was recognized by our casualty
segment primarily as a result of general casualty, professional liability and healthcare
lines of business actual loss emergence being lower than the initial expected loss
emergence for the 2002 through 2004 loss years. During the three months ended September
30, 2008, we adjusted our weighting on actuarial methods utilized for these lines of
business and loss years by increasing the weight given to the Bornhuetter-Ferguson reported
loss method than the previous blend of the Bornhuetter-Ferguson reported loss method and
the expected loss ratio method. Placing greater reliance on more responsive actuarial
methods for certain lines of business and loss years within our casualty segment is a
natural progression as we mature as a company and gain sufficient historical experience of
our own that allows us to further refine our estimate of the reserve for losses and loss
expenses. |
-28-
|
|
|
Net favorable reserve development of $39.4 million was recognized by our reinsurance
segment, which consisted of net favorable reserve development of $14.7 million for our
professional liability reinsurance, general casualty reinsurance,
accident and health
reinsurance and facultative reinsurance lines of business and $24.7 million of net
favorable reserve development for our property reinsurance and international reinsurance
lines of business. The net favorable reserve development for our professional liability
reinsurance, general casualty reinsurance, accident and health reinsurance and facultative
reinsurance lines of business was primarily the result of actual loss emergence being lower
than the initial expected loss emergence for the 2003 through 2005 loss years. During the
three months ended September 30, 2008, we began to adjust our weighting on actuarial
methods utilized for the professional liability reinsurance, general casualty reinsurance
and facultative reinsurance lines of business and loss years from using the expected loss
ratio method to a blend of the Bornhuetter-Ferguson reported loss method and the expected
loss ratio method. The net favorable reserve development for our property reinsurance and
international reinsurance lines of business was primarily the result of actual loss
emergence being lower than the initial expected loss emergence for the 2002 through 2007
loss years. The net favorable reserve development for the property reinsurance and
international reinsurance lines of business included $6.5 million of unfavorable reserve
development related to the 2004 and 2005 windstorms due to recent loss activity. |
The following is a breakdown of the major factors contributing to the net favorable reserve
development for the three months ended September 30, 2007:
|
|
|
We recognized net favorable reserve development of $22.5 million related to the 2005
windstorms and net favorable reserve development of $1.3 million related to the 2004
windstorms due to lower than anticipated reported loss activity over the past 12 months. |
|
|
|
|
Net favorable reserve development of $12.4 million in our casualty segment, which
primarily related to our general casualty line of business for the 2004 and 2005 loss
years as a result of lower than anticipated reported loss activity. |
|
|
|
|
Net unfavorable reserve development of $7.7 million, excluding the 2004 and 2005
windstorms, in our property segment, which was primarily the result of higher than
anticipated reported loss activity in our general property line of business for loss years
2004 and 2005. |
The loss and loss expense ratio for the three months ended September 30, 2008 was 64.7%,
compared to 61.1% for the three months ended September 30, 2007. Net favorable reserve development
recognized in the three months ended September 30, 2008 reduced the loss and loss expense ratio by
35.6 percentage points. Thus, the loss and loss expense ratio related to the current periods
business was 100.3%. Net favorable reserve development recognized in the three months ended
September 30, 2007 reduced the loss and loss expense ratio by 10.1 percentage points. Thus, the
loss and loss expense ratio related to that periods business was 71.2%. The increase in the
current years loss and loss expense ratio for the current period was primarily due to net incurred
losses and loss expenses related to Hurricanes Ike and Gustav of $71.6 million, as well as $19.2
million due to increased loss activity in our general property and energy lines of business for the
2008 loss year.
We continue to review the impact of the subprime and credit related downturn on professional
liability insurance policies and reinsurance contracts we write. We have high attachment points
for our professional liability policies and contracts, which makes estimating whether losses will
exceed our attachment point more difficult. An attachment
point is the loss point at which an
insurance policy or reinsurance contract becomes operative and below which any losses are retained
by either the insured or other insurers of reinsurers. Based on claims information received to
date and our analysis, the average attachment point for our professional liability policies with
potential subprime and credit related exposure is approximately $144 million with an average
limit of $14 million (gross of reinsurance). The limit is the maximum amount
we will insure or reinsure for a specified risk or portfolio of risks. Our direct insurance
policies with subprime and credit related loss notices may have the benefit of facultative
reinsurance, treaty reinsurance or a combination of both. For our professional liability
reinsurance contracts with potential subprime and credit related exposure, the average attachment
point is approximately $101 million with an average limit of $1.7 million. At
this time we believe, based on the claims information received to date, that our current IBNR is
adequate to meet any potential subprime and credit related losses. We will continue to monitor our
reserve for losses and loss expenses for any new claims information and adjust our reserve for
losses and loss expenses accordingly.
The following table shows the components of the increase in net losses and loss expenses of
$2.8 million for the three months ended September 30, 2008 compared to the three months ended
September 30, 2007.
-29-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
Dollar |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
Change |
|
|
|
($ in millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
Net losses paid |
|
$ |
132.6 |
|
|
$ |
82.7 |
|
|
$ |
49.9 |
|
Net change in reported case reserves |
|
|
(8.8 |
) |
|
|
57.2 |
|
|
|
(66.0 |
) |
Net change in IBNR |
|
|
52.2 |
|
|
|
33.3 |
|
|
|
18.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net losses and loss expenses |
|
$ |
176.0 |
|
|
$ |
173.2 |
|
|
$ |
2.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net losses paid have increased $49.9 million for the three months ended September 30, 2008
primarily due to higher paid losses in our casualty segment partially offset by lower claim
payments relating to the 2004 and 2005 windstorms than the amount paid during the three months
ended September 30, 2007. During the three months ended September 30, 2008, $11.6 million of net
losses were paid in relation to the 2004 and 2005 windstorms compared to $15.5 million during the
three months ended September 30, 2007. During the three months ended September 30, 2008, we
recovered $1.1 million on our property catastrophe reinsurance protection in relation to losses
paid as a result of the 2004 and 2005 windstorms compared to $7.2 million for the three months
ended September 30, 2007. The decrease in reported case reserves was due to lower case reserves
for our casualty segment. The increase in IBNR was primarily due to increased reserves for losses
and loss expenses for our current periods business partially offset by higher net favorable loss
reserve development.
The table below is a reconciliation of the beginning and ending reserves for losses and loss
expenses for the three months ended September 30, 2008 and 2007. Losses incurred and paid are
reflected net of reinsurance recoverables.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
($ in millions) |
|
Net reserves for losses and loss expenses, July 1 |
|
$ |
3,385.6 |
|
|
$ |
3,064.5 |
|
Incurred related to: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current period non-catastrophe |
|
|
201.5 |
|
|
|
201.7 |
|
Current period property catastrophe |
|
|
71.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
Prior period non-catastrophe |
|
|
(96.9 |
) |
|
|
(4.7 |
) |
Prior period property catastrophe |
|
|
(0.2 |
) |
|
|
(23.8 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total incurred |
|
$ |
176.0 |
|
|
$ |
173.2 |
|
Paid related to: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current period non-catastrophe |
|
|
11.5 |
|
|
|
7.7 |
|
Current period property catastrophe |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prior period non-catastrophe |
|
|
109.5 |
|
|
|
59.5 |
|
Prior period property catastrophe |
|
|
11.6 |
|
|
|
15.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total paid |
|
$ |
132.6 |
|
|
$ |
82.7 |
|
Foreign exchange revaluation |
|
|
(7.5 |
) |
|
|
2.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net reserve for losses and loss expenses, September 30 |
|
|
3,421.5 |
|
|
|
3,157.6 |
|
Losses and loss expenses recoverable |
|
|
777.3 |
|
|
|
674.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reserve for losses and loss expenses, September 30 |
|
$ |
4,198.8 |
|
|
$ |
3,832.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acquisition Costs
Acquisition costs decreased by $0.6 million, or 2.1%, for the three months ended September 30,
2008 compared to the three months ended September 30, 2007. Acquisition costs as a percentage of
net premiums earned were 10.5% for the three months ended September 30, 2008 compared to 10.3% for
the same period in 2007.
General and Administrative Expenses
General and administrative expenses increased by $4.7 million, or 13.0%, for the three months
ended September 30, 2008 compared to the same period in 2007. The increase in general and
administrative expenses is primarily due to increased salary and employee welfare costs, including
stock-based compensation costs of $1.8 million, as well as increased rent and related costs of
approximately $1.1 million primarily due to additional office space in New York and Chicago and
increased amortization of furniture and fixtures. The increase in salary and employee welfare
costs was due to our staff count increasing to 351 as of September 30, 2008
-30-
from 284
as of September 30, 2007 as a result of the significant expansion of our U.S. operations
as part of our ongoing U.S. strategic initiatives.
Our general and administrative expense ratio was 15.0% for the three months ended September
30, 2008, which was higher than the 12.7% for the three months ended September 30, 2007. The
increase was primarily due to the factors discussed above, while net premiums earned declined.
Our expense ratio was 25.5% for the three months ended September 30, 2008 compared to 23.0%
for the three months ended September 30, 2007.
Interest Expense
During both the three months ended September 30, 2008 and 2007, interest expense incurred of
$9.5 million represented one quarter of the annual interest expense on the senior notes, which bear
interest at an annual rate of 7.50%.
Net Income
Net loss for the three months ended September 30, 2008 was $46.4 million compared to net
income of $109.0 million for the three months ended September 30, 2007. The decrease was primarily
the result of higher net realized investment losses, net losses and loss expenses for Hurricanes
Ike and Gustav, lower net premiums earned and increased general and administrative expenses. Net
loss for the three months ended September 30, 2008 included a net foreign exchange gain of $2.7
million and an income tax recovery $8.8 million. Net income for the three months ended September
30, 2007 included a net foreign exchange gain of $1.0 million and an income tax recovery of
$0.4 million.
Comparison of Nine Months Ended September 30, 2008 and 2007
Premiums
Gross premiums written decreased by $110.6 million, or 8.9%, for the nine months ended
September 30, 2008 compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2007. The decrease in gross
premiums written was primarily the result of the following:
|
|
|
The non-renewal of business that did not meet our underwriting requirements (which
included inadequate pricing and/or policy or contract terms and conditions), increased
competition and inadequate pricing for new business in each of our operating segments.
This included reducing the amount of gross premiums written in our energy line of
business within our property segment by $25.5 million, or 35.8%, and reducing the amount
of gross premiums written for certain energy classes of business within our casualty
segment by $8.2 million in response to deteriorating market conditions. |
|
|
|
|
In our reinsurance segment, adjustments on estimated premiums were lower by $16.3
million during the nine months ended September 30, 2008 compared to the nine months
ended September 30, 2007. We recognized net downward adjustments of $5.2 million during
the nine months ended September 30, 2008 compared to net upward adjustments of $11.1
million during the nine months ended September 30, 2007. Gross premiums written also
decreased in our reinsurance segment by approximately $12.0 million because some cedents
purchased less reinsurance. |
-31-
The table below illustrates our gross premiums written by geographic locations for the nine
months ended September 30, 2008 and 2007.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
Dollar |
|
|
Percentage |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
Change |
|
|
Change |
|
|
|
($ in millions) |
|
Bermuda |
|
$ |
693.6 |
|
|
$ |
907.7 |
|
|
$ |
(214.1 |
) |
|
|
(23.6 |
)% |
United States |
|
|
251.7 |
|
|
|
141.0 |
|
|
|
110.7 |
|
|
|
78.5 |
|
Europe |
|
|
189.3 |
|
|
|
196.5 |
|
|
|
(7.2 |
) |
|
|
(3.7 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1,134.6 |
|
|
$ |
1,245.2 |
|
|
$ |
(110.6 |
) |
|
|
(8.9 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The decrease in gross premiums written for our Bermuda operations, in addition to the factors
discussed above, was due to the fact that certain policies and treaties that were previously
written in Bermuda during the nine months ended September 30, 2007 were renewed in our U.S.
companies during the nine months ended September 30, 2008. Our new U.S. reinsurance company
commenced operations in April 2008 and renewed treaties previously written in Bermuda of $52.5
million during the nine months ended September 30, 2008.
Net premiums written decreased by $83.0 million, or 8.6%, for the nine months ended September
30, 2008 compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2007. We ceded 22.4% of gross premiums
written for the nine months ended September 30, 2008 compared to 22.6% for the same period in 2007.
Net premiums earned decreased by $59.4 million, or 6.8%, for the nine months ended September
30, 2008 compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2007 as a result of lower net premiums
written.
We evaluate our business by segment, distinguishing between property insurance, casualty
insurance and reinsurance. The following chart illustrates the mix of our business on both a gross
premiums written and net premiums earned basis.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross |
|
Net |
|
|
Premiums |
|
Premiums |
|
|
Written |
|
Earned |
|
|
Nine Months Ended September 30, |
|
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
Property |
|
|
24.3 |
% |
|
|
25.6 |
% |
|
|
16.1 |
% |
|
|
15.7 |
% |
Casualty |
|
|
38.7 |
|
|
|
35.0 |
|
|
|
39.3 |
|
|
|
41.6 |
|
Reinsurance |
|
|
37.0 |
|
|
|
39.4 |
|
|
|
44.6 |
|
|
|
42.7 |
|
The increase in the percentage of casualty gross premiums written reflects the continued
growth of our U.S. operations, where casualty gross premiums written increased by $27.7 million, or
30.1%, for the nine months ended September 30, 2008 compared to the nine months ended September 30,
2007.
Net Investment Income and Realized Investment Losses
Net investment income increased by $3.5 million, or 1.6%, for the nine months ended September
30, 2008 compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2007. The increase was primarily the
result of an increase in the dividend received from our global high-yield bond fund of $4.0
million. The dividend from the global high-yield bond fund increased from $2.1 million for the
nine months ended September 30, 2007 to $6.1 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2008.
Investment management fees of $4.8 million and $4.6 million were incurred during the nine months
ended September 30, 2008 and 2007, respectively.
For the nine months ended September 30, 2008 and 2007, the annualized period book yield of the
investment portfolio was 4.8% and 4.7%, respectively. As of September 30, 2008, approximately 99%
of our fixed income investments (which included individually held securities and securities held in
a global high-yield bond fund) consisted of investment grade securities. The average credit rating
of our fixed income portfolio was AA+ as rated by Standard & Poors and Aa1 as rated by Moodys
Investors Service, with an average duration of approximately 3.4 years as of September 30, 2008.
Net realized investment losses increased by $140.7 million for the nine months ended September
30, 2008 compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2007. Net realized investment losses of
$152.8 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2008
were comprised of the following:
-32-
|
|
|
A write-down of approximately $112.3 million related to declines in the market value
of securities in our available for sale portfolio that were considered to be other than
temporary. The declines in the market value of these securities were primarily due to
the write-down of residential and commercial mortgage-backed securities and corporate
bonds due to the widening of credit spreads caused by the continued decline in the U.S.
housing market and the current turmoil in the financial markets. An
other-than-temporary charge was recognized for those securities in an
unrealized loss position that our investment advisers had the
discretion to sell. The following shows the other-than-temporary charge for our fixed maturity
investments by category: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other-than- |
|
|
|
temporary charges |
|
|
|
For the nine months |
|
|
|
ended September 30, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
($ in millions) |
|
U.S. government and government agencies |
|
$ |
15.5 |
|
Non-U.S. government and government agencies |
|
|
0.7 |
|
Corporate |
|
|
51.8 |
|
States, municipalities and political subdivisions |
|
|
0.8 |
|
Mortgage backed |
|
|
39.8 |
|
Asset backed |
|
|
3.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total
other-than-temporary-impairment charges |
|
$ |
112.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net realized investment losses of $39.5 million related to the mark-to-market of our
hedge fund investments. The net realized losses were due to the overall volatility of
the capital markets. There were no realized investment gains or losses recognized from
our hedge fund investments during the nine months ended September 30, 2007. |
|
|
|
|
Net realized investment losses of $1.0 million from the sale of securities. We sold
a number of securities during the first half of 2008 to capitalize the operations of our
U.S. reinsurance platform and to fund the increased capitalization of our direct U.S.
operations and our European operations. We recognized a net gain on the sale of those
securities of $48.2 million, which was later offset by $49.2 million in net realized
investment losses during the three months ended September 30, 2008. |
During the nine months ended September 30, 2007, we recognized $12.1 million in net realized
losses on investments, which included (i) a write-down of approximately $37.7 million related to
declines in market value of securities in our available for sale portfolio that were considered to
be other than temporary and (ii) net realized gains from the sale of securities of $25.6 million.
Included in the $37.7 million in write-downs was an other-than-temporary impairment of $23.9
million related to our investment in the Goldman Sachs Global Alpha Hedge Fund PLC. The remaining
write-downs of $13.8 million were solely due to changes in interest rates.
Net Losses and Loss Expenses
Net losses and loss expenses decreased by $17.9 million, or 3.5%, for the nine months ended
September 30, 2008 compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2007. The primary reason for
the reduction in these expenses was net favorable prior year reserve development during the nine
months ended September 30, 2008 compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2007, partially
offset by higher than expected loss activity for the current periods business, including net
losses and loss expenses of $71.6 million related to Hurricanes Ike and Gustav.
We recorded net favorable reserve development related to prior years of approximately $189.8
million and $87.1 million during the nine months ended September 30, 2008 and 2007, respectively.
The following is a breakdown of the major factors contributing to the net favorable reserve
development for the nine months ended September 30, 2008:
-33-
|
|
|
We recognized net favorable reserve development of $33.4 million related to the 2005
windstorms, of which $17.2 million was recognized by our property segment and $16.2 million
was recognized by our reinsurance segment. We recognized the net favorable reserve
development for the 2005 windstorms due to less than anticipated reported loss activity
over the past several quarters. Accordingly, as of September 30, 2008, we estimated our
net losses related to Hurricanes Katrina, Rita and Wilma to be $387.1 million, which was a
reduction from our original estimate of $456.0 million. |
|
|
|
|
Net favorable reserve development of $80.0 million was recognized by our casualty
segment primarily as a result of general casualty, professional liability and healthcare
lines of business actual loss emergence being lower than the initial expected loss
emergence for the 2002 through 2004 loss years. |
|
|
|
|
Net favorable reserve development of $28.4 million, excluding the 2005 windstorms, was
recognized by our property segment primarily as a result of general property line of
business actual loss emergence being lower than the initial expected loss emergence for the
2003 through 2007 loss years. |
|
|
|
|
Net favorable reserve development of $48.0 million, excluding the 2005 windstorms, was
recognized by our reinsurance segment which consisted of net favorable reserve development
of $14.7 million for our professional liability reinsurance, general casualty reinsurance,
accident and health reinsurance and facultative reinsurance lines of business, and $33.3
million of net favorable reserve development for our property reinsurance and international
reinsurance lines of business. The net favorable reserve development for our professional
liability reinsurance, general casualty reinsurance, accident and health reinsurance and
facultative reinsurance lines of business was primarily as a result of actual loss
emergence being lower than the initial expected loss emergence for the 2003 through 2005
loss years. The net favorable reserve development for our property reinsurance and
international reinsurance lines of business was primarily the result of actual loss
emergence being lower than the initial expected loss emergence for the 2002 through 2007
loss years. |
The following is a breakdown of the major factors contributing to the net favorable reserve
development for the nine months ended September 30, 2007:
|
|
|
Net favorable reserve development of $42.2 million for our casualty segment, which
consisted of $126.5 million of favorable reserve development primarily related to low
loss emergence in our professional liability and healthcare lines of business for the
2003, 2004 and 2006 loss years and low loss emergence in our general casualty business
for the 2004 loss year. These favorable reserve developments were partially offset by
$84.3 million of unfavorable reserve development due to higher than anticipated loss
emergence in our general casualty line of business for the 2003 and 2005 loss years and
our professional liability line of business for the 2002 loss year. |
|
|
|
|
We recognized net favorable reserve development of $35.0 million related to the 2005
windstorms and net favorable reserve development of $4.0 million related to the 2004
windstorms. We recognized the net favorable reserve development for the 2004 and 2005
windstorms due to less than anticipated reported loss activity. |
|
|
|
|
Net favorable reserve development of $2.6 million, excluding the 2004 and 2005
windstorms, for our property segment which consisted of $28.4 million in favorable
reserve development that was primarily the result of general property business actual
loss emergence being lower than the initial expected loss emergence for the 2003 and
2006 loss years, partially offset by unfavorable reserve development of $25.8 million
that was primarily the result of increased loss activity for our general property
business for the 2004 and 2005 loss years and our energy business for the 2006 loss
year. |
|
|
|
|
Net favorable reserve development of $3.3 million, excluding the 2004 and 2005
windstorms, for our reinsurance segment related to low loss emergence in our property
reinsurance lines of business for the 2004 and 2005 loss years and low loss emergence in
our accident and health reinsurance line of business for the 2004 and 2005 loss years. |
The loss and loss expense ratio for the nine months ended September 30, 2008 was 61.1%,
compared to 59.0% for the nine months ended September 30, 2007. Net favorable reserve development
recognized in the nine months ended September 30, 2008 reduced the loss and loss expense ratio by
23.3 percentage points. Thus, the loss and loss expense ratio related to the current periods
business was 84.4%. Net favorable reserve development recognized in the nine months ended September
30, 2007 reduced the loss and loss expense ratio by 10.0 percentage points. Thus, the loss and loss
expense ratio related to that periods business was 69.0%. The increase in the current years loss
and loss expense ratio for the current period was due to higher than normal reported loss
-34-
activity and lower rates on new and renewal business for each of our operating segments.
During the nine months ended September 30, 2008, we had exposure to a number of property losses,
which included fires, tornadoes, hail storms and floods in various regions of the United States and
in other parts of the world, a gas pipeline explosion in Australia and Hurricanes Ike and Gustav.
The following table shows the components of the decrease in net losses and loss expenses of
$17.9 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2008 compared to the nine months ended
September 30, 2007.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30 |
|
|
Dollar |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
Change |
|
|
|
($ in millions) |
|
Net losses paid |
|
$ |
308.0 |
|
|
$ |
309.8 |
|
|
$ |
(1.8 |
) |
Net change in reported case reserves |
|
|
28.1 |
|
|
|
54.8 |
|
|
|
(26.7 |
) |
Net change in IBNR |
|
|
161.5 |
|
|
|
150.9 |
|
|
|
10.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net losses and loss expenses |
|
$ |
497.6 |
|
|
$ |
515.5 |
|
|
$ |
(17.9 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net losses paid have decreased $1.8 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2008
primarily due to lower claim payments relating to the 2004 and 2005 windstorms than the amount paid
during the nine months ended September 30, 2007 partially offset by higher claim payments for our
casualty segment. During the nine months ended September 30, 2008, $37.9 million of net losses
were paid in relation to the 2004 and 2005 windstorms compared to $74.5 million during the nine
months ended September 30, 2007. During the nine months ended September 30, 2008, we recovered
$9.4 million on our property catastrophe reinsurance protection in relation to losses paid as a
result of the 2004 and 2005 windstorms compared to $25.6 million for the nine months ended
September 30, 2007. The decrease in reported case reserves is due to lower case reserves in our
casualty segment partially offset by increased case reserves for our property and reinsurance
segments due to the increased loss activity during the current period. The increase in IBNR was
primarily due to increased reserves for losses and loss expenses for our current periods business
partially offset by higher net favorable loss reserve development.
The table below is a reconciliation of the beginning and ending reserves for losses and loss
expenses for the nine months ended September 30, 2008 and 2007. Losses incurred and paid are
reflected net of reinsurance recoverables.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
($ in millions) |
|
Net reserves for losses and loss expenses, January 1 |
|
$ |
3,237.0 |
|
|
$ |
2,947.9 |
|
Incurred related to: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current period non-catastrophe |
|
|
574.8 |
|
|
|
602.6 |
|
Current period property catastrophe |
|
|
112.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
Prior period non-catastrophe |
|
|
(156.4 |
) |
|
|
(48.1 |
) |
Prior period property catastrophe |
|
|
(33.4 |
) |
|
|
(39.0 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total incurred |
|
$ |
497.6 |
|
|
$ |
515.5 |
|
Paid related to: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current period non-catastrophe |
|
|
21.7 |
|
|
|
11.0 |
|
Current period property catastrophe |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prior period non-catastrophe |
|
|
248.4 |
|
|
|
224.3 |
|
Prior period property catastrophe |
|
|
37.9 |
|
|
|
74.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total paid |
|
$ |
308.0 |
|
|
$ |
309.8 |
|
Foreign exchange revaluation |
|
|
(5.1 |
) |
|
|
4.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net reserve for losses and loss expenses, September 30 |
|
|
3,421.5 |
|
|
|
3,157.6 |
|
Losses and loss expenses recoverable |
|
|
777.3 |
|
|
|
674.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reserve for losses and loss expenses, September 30 |
|
$ |
4,198.8 |
|
|
$ |
3,832.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acquisition Costs
Acquisition costs decreased by $8.5 million, or 9.4%, for the nine months ended September 30,
2008 compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2007. Acquisition costs as a percentage of
net premiums earned were 10.0% for the nine months ended September 30, 2008 compared to 10.3% for
the same period in 2007.
-35-
General and Administrative Expenses
General and administrative expenses increased by $26.8 million, or 25.8%, for the nine months
ended September 30, 2008 compared to the same period in 2007. The following is a breakdown of the
major factors contributing to the increase:
|
|
|
Salary and employee welfare costs increased by $18.1 million due to our staff count
increasing to 351 as of September 30, 2008 from 284 as of September 30, 2007. This also included
a one-time expense of $4.0 million for the reimbursement of forfeited stock compensation
and signing bonuses for new executives hired as a result of the continued expansion of our
U.S. operations and increased stock-based compensation costs of $3.6 million. |
|
|
|
|
Information technology costs increased by approximately $3.7 million due to consulting
costs required as part of the development of our technological infrastructure as well as an
increase in the cost of hardware and software. |
|
|
|
|
Rent and related costs increased by approximately $2.9 million due to additional office
space in New York and Chicago and increased amortization of furniture and fixtures. There
was a gain of $0.6 million on the sale of fixed assets from our previous office space in
Bermuda during the nine months ended September 30, 2007. No such gain on fixed assets
occurred during the nine months ended September 30, 2008. |
|
|
|
|
Professional fees increased by approximately $1.2 million. |
Our general and administrative expense ratio was 16.0% for the nine months ended September 30,
2008, which was higher than the 11.9% for the nine months ended September 30, 2007. The increase
was primarily due to the factors discussed above, while net premiums earned declined.
Our expense ratio was 26.0% for the nine months ended September 30, 2008 compared to 22.2% for
the nine months ended September 30, 2007. The increase resulted from increased general and
administrative expenses.
Interest Expense
Interest expense increased by $0.2 million, or 0.7%, for the nine months ended September 30,
2008 compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2007. Interest expense incurred during both
the nine months ended September 30, 2008 and 2007 represented three-quarters of the annual interest
expense on the senior notes, which bear interest at an annual rate of 7.50%.
Net Income
Net income for the nine months ended September 30, 2008 was $163.8 million compared to net
income of $346.2 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2007. The decrease was primarily
the result of higher net realized investment losses, net losses and loss expenses for Hurricanes
Ike and Gustav, lower net premiums earned and increased general and administrative expenses. Net
income for the nine months ended September 30, 2008 included a net foreign exchange gain of $2.7
million and an income tax recovery of $12.1 million. Net income for the nine months ended
September 30, 2007 included a net foreign exchange gain of $0.4 million and an income tax expense
of $0.4 million.
Underwriting Results by Operating Segments
Our company is organized into three operating segments:
Property Segment. Our property segment provides direct coverage of physical property and
business interruption coverage for commercial property and energy-related risks. We write solely
commercial coverages and focus on the insurance of primary risk layers. This means that we are
typically part of the first group of insurers that cover a loss up to a specified limit.
Casualty Segment. Our casualty segment provides direct coverage for general and product
liability, professional liability and healthcare liability risks. We focus primarily on insurance
of excess layers, where we insure the second and/or subsequent layers of a policy above the primary
layer. Our direct casualty underwriters provide a variety of specialty insurance casualty products
to large and complex organizations around the world.
-36-
Reinsurance Segment. Our reinsurance segment includes the reinsurance of property, general
casualty, professional liability, specialty lines and property catastrophe coverages written by
other insurance companies. We presently write reinsurance on both a treaty and a facultative
basis, targeting several niche reinsurance markets including professional liability lines,
specialty casualty, property for U.S. regional insurers, accident and health and to a lesser extent
marine and aviation lines.
Property Segment
The following table summarizes the underwriting results and associated ratios for the property
segment for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2008 and 2007.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
September 30, |
|
September 30, |
|
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
|
($ in millions) |
Revenues |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross premiums written |
|
$ |
57.4 |
|
|
$ |
60.2 |
|
|
$ |
275.5 |
|
|
$ |
318.5 |
|
Net premiums written |
|
|
35.5 |
|
|
|
32.4 |
|
|
|
136.3 |
|
|
|
137.5 |
|
Net premiums earned |
|
|
42.9 |
|
|
|
44.2 |
|
|
|
130.7 |
|
|
|
137.0 |
|
Expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net losses and loss expenses |
|
$ |
71.2 |
|
|
$ |
29.3 |
|
|
$ |
148.6 |
|
|
$ |
70.3 |
|
Acquisition costs |
|
|
2.4 |
|
|
|
(0.8 |
) |
|
|
0.0 |
|
|
|
(0.4 |
) |
General and administrative expenses |
|
|
9.3 |
|
|
|
8.4 |
|
|
|
30.7 |
|
|
|
24.3 |
|
Underwriting (loss) income |
|
|
(40.0 |
) |
|
|
7.3 |
|
|
|
(48.6 |
) |
|
|
42.8 |
|
Ratios |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss and loss expense ratio |
|
|
166.0 |
% |
|
|
66.2 |
% |
|
|
113.7 |
% |
|
|
51.3 |
% |
Acquisition cost ratio |
|
|
5.7 |
|
|
|
(1.8 |
) |
|
|
0.0 |
|
|
|
(0.3 |
) |
General and administrative expense ratio |
|
|
21.5 |
|
|
|
19.0 |
|
|
|
23.5 |
|
|
|
17.8 |
|
Expense ratio |
|
|
27.2 |
|
|
|
17.2 |
|
|
|
23.5 |
|
|
|
17.5 |
|
Combined ratio |
|
|
193.2 |
|
|
|
83.4 |
|
|
|
137.2 |
|
|
|
68.8 |
|
Comparison of Three Months Ended September 30, 2008 and 2007
Premiums. Gross premiums written decreased $2.8 million, or 4.7%, for the three months ended
September 30, 2008 compared to the same period in 2007. This decrease was primarily due to the
non-renewal of business that did not meet our underwriting requirements (which included inadequate
pricing and/or policy terms and conditions), increased competition
and inadequate pricing for new
business. In addition, we continued to reduce the amount of gross premiums written in our energy
line of business by $8.0 million, or 44.4%, in response to deteriorating market conditions. We
expect the trend of reducing our energy line of business to continue during the remainder of the
year.
-37-
The table below illustrates our gross premiums written by line of business for the three
months ended September 30, 2008 and 2007.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
Dollar |
|
|
Percentage |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
Change |
|
|
Change |
|
|
|
($ in millions) |
|
General property |
|
$ |
47.4 |
|
|
$ |
41.7 |
|
|
$ |
5.7 |
|
|
|
13.7 |
% |
Energy |
|
|
10.0 |
|
|
|
18.0 |
|
|
|
(8.0 |
) |
|
|
(44.4 |
) |
Other |
|
|
0.0 |
|
|
|
0.5 |
|
|
|
(0.5 |
) |
|
|
(100.0 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
57.4 |
|
|
$ |
60.2 |
|
|
$ |
(2.8 |
) |
|
|
(4.7 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net premiums written increased by $3.1 million, or 9.6%, for the three months ended September
30, 2008 compared to the three months ended September 30, 2007. Overall, we ceded 38.3% of gross
premiums written for the three months ended September 30, 2008 compared to 46.2% for the three
months ended September 30, 2007. The decrease in the percentage of premiums ceded was caused by a
reduction in the cession percentage on our general property quota share reinsurance treaty from 55%
to 40% partially offset by the purchase of a property catastrophe excess-of-loss reinsurance treaty
for our general property business with a limit of $75 million excess of $50 million, of which 25%
was placed with external reinsurers and the remainder of which was retained by us. This
excess-of-loss reinsurance treaty covers property damage within the U.S. and Canada caused by a
named windstorm. The excess-of-loss reinsurance treaty has a term
from July 1, 2008 to November 30, 2008. There was no property catastrophe excess-of-loss treaty in place during the three months
ended September 30, 2007.
Net premiums earned decreased $1.3 million, or 2.9%, primarily due to the continued earning of
lower net premiums that were written prior to the three months ended September 30, 2008.
Net losses and loss expenses. Net losses and loss expenses increased by $41.9 million, or
143.0%, for the three months ended September 30, 2008 compared to the three months ended September
30, 2007. During the three months ended September 30, 2008 our property segment recognized losses
and loss expenses of $42.2 million and $7.1 million related to Hurricanes Ike and Gustav,
respectively. We were not impacted by any significant catastrophes during the three months ended
September 30, 2007.
Overall, our property segment recorded net favorable reserve development of $24.7 million
during the three months ended September 30, 2008 compared to net favorable reserve development of
$12.9 million for the three months ended September 30, 2007.
The $24.7 million of net favorable reserve development during the three months ended September
30, 2008 included the following:
|
|
|
Net favorable reserve development of $18.0 million, excluding the 2004 and 2005
windstorms, was primarily due to actual loss emergence being lower than the initial
expected loss emergence for the 2003 through 2005 and 2007 loss years for our general
property line of business. |
|
|
|
|
We recognized net favorable reserve development of $5.9 million related to the 2005
windstorms and net favorable reserve development of $0.8 million related to the 2004
windstorms. We recognized net favorable reserve development for the 2004 and 2005
windstorms due to lower than anticipated loss activity over the past several months. |
The $12.9 million of net favorable reserve development during the three months ended September
30, 2007 included the following:
|
|
|
We recognized net favorable reserve development of $21.7 million related to the 2005
windstorms and net unfavorable reserve development of $1.1 million related to the 2004
windstorms. We recognized the net favorable reserve development for the 2005 windstorms
due to less than anticipated reported loss activity. The unfavorable reserve
development recognized related to the 2004 windstorms was due to changes to our
reinsurance recoverables as more losses were fully retained by us than originally
estimated. |
|
|
|
|
Net unfavorable reserve development of $7.7 million, excluding the 2004 and 2005
windstorms, was primarily related to higher than anticipated loss activity in our
general property line of business for the 2004 and 2005 loss years. |
-38-
The loss and loss expense ratio for the three months ended September 30, 2008 was 166.0%
compared to 66.2% for the three months ended September 30, 2007. Net favorable reserve development
recognized in the three months ended September 30, 2008 decreased the loss and loss expense ratio
by 57.6 percentage points. Thus, the loss and loss expense ratio for this periods business was
223.6%. In comparison, net favorable reserve development recognized in the three months ended
September 30, 2007 decreased the loss and loss expense ratio by 29.2 percentage points. Thus, the
loss and loss expense ratio for that periods business was 95.4%. The increase in the loss and
loss expense ratio for the current periods business was due to net losses and loss expenses
recognized of $49.3 million related to Hurricanes Ike and Gustav, as well as $19.2 million due to
increased loss activity in our general property and energy lines of business for the 2008 loss
year.
Net paid losses for the three months ended September 30, 2008 and 2007 were $31.6 million and
$32.5 million, respectively. The decrease in paid losses was due to lower net paid losses related
to the 2004 and 2005 windstorms. During the three months ended September 30, 2008, approximately
$4.5 million of net losses were paid in relation to the 2004 and 2005 windstorms compared to
approximately $11.4 million during the three months ended September 30, 2007.
The table below is a reconciliation of the beginning and ending reserves for losses and loss
expenses for the three months ended September 30, 2008 and 2007. Losses incurred and paid are
reflected net of reinsurance recoverables.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
($ in millions) |
|
Net reserves for losses and loss expenses, July 1 |
|
$ |
358.1 |
|
|
$ |
375.9 |
|
Incurred related to: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current period non-catastrophe |
|
|
46.6 |
|
|
|
42.2 |
|
Current period property catastrophe |
|
|
49.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
Prior period non-catastrophe |
|
|
(18.0 |
) |
|
|
7.7 |
|
Prior period property catastrophe |
|
|
(6.7 |
) |
|
|
(20.6 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total incurred |
|
$ |
71.2 |
|
|
$ |
29.3 |
|
Paid related to: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current period non-catastrophe |
|
|
8.4 |
|
|
|
6.0 |
|
Current period property catastrophe |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prior period non-catastrophe |
|
|
18.7 |
|
|
|
15.1 |
|
Prior period property catastrophe |
|
|
4.5 |
|
|
|
11.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total paid |
|
$ |
31.6 |
|
|
$ |
32.5 |
|
Foreign exchange revaluation |
|
|
(7.5 |
) |
|
|
2.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net reserve for losses and loss expenses, September 30 |
|
|
390.2 |
|
|
|
375.3 |
|
Losses and loss expenses recoverable |
|
|
346.9 |
|
|
|
416.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reserve for losses and loss expenses, September 30 |
|
$ |
737.1 |
|
|
$ |
792.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acquisition costs. Acquisition costs increased by $3.2 million for the three months ended
September 30, 2008 compared to the three months ended September 30, 2007. The increase was
primarily caused by less ceding commission income as a result of our lowering the cession
percentage on our general property quota share treaty. The acquisition cost ratio increased to
5.7% for the three months ended September 30, 2008 from negative 1.8% for the same period in 2007.
The factors that will determine the amount of acquisition costs going forward are the amount of
brokerage fees and commissions incurred on policies we write less ceding commissions earned on
reinsurance we purchase. We normally negotiate our reinsurance treaties on an annual basis, so the
ceding commission rates and amounts ceded will vary from renewal period to renewal period.
General and administrative expenses. General and administrative expenses increased by $0.9
million, or 10.7%, for the three months ended September 30, 2008 compared to the three months ended
September 30, 2007. The increase in general and administrative expenses was attributable to
increased salary and employee welfare costs, increased building-related costs, increased
professional fees and higher costs associated with information technology. The increase in the
general and administrative expense ratio from 19.0% for the three months ended September 30, 2007
to 21.5% for the same period in 2008 was the result of the factors discussed above, while net
premiums earned declined.
-39-
Comparison of Nine Months Ended September 30, 2008 and 2007
Premiums. Gross premiums written decreased by $43.0 million, or 13.5%, for the nine months
ended September 30, 2008 compared to the same period in 2007. This decrease was primarily due to
the non-renewal of business that did not meet our underwriting requirements (which included
inadequate pricing and/or policy terms and conditions), increased
competition and inadequate pricing for new business. In addition, we reduced the amount of gross premiums written in our
energy line of business by $25.5 million, or 35.8%, in response to deteriorating market conditions.
We expect the trend of reducing our energy line of business to continue during the remainder of
the year.
The table below illustrates our gross premiums written by line of business for the nine months
ended September 30, 2008 and 2007.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
Dollar |
|
|
Percentage |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
Change |
|
|
Change |
|
|
|
($ in millions) |
|
General property |
|
$ |
229.5 |
|
|
$ |
246.1 |
|
|
$ |
(16.6 |
) |
|
|
(6.7 |
)% |
Energy |
|
|
45.7 |
|
|
|
71.2 |
|
|
|
(25.5 |
) |
|
|
(35.8 |
) |
Other |
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
|
1.2 |
|
|
|
(0.9 |
) |
|
|
(75.0 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
275.5 |
|
|
$ |
318.5 |
|
|
$ |
(43.0 |
) |
|
|
(13.5 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net premiums written decreased by $1.2 million, or 0.9%, for the nine months ended September
30, 2008 compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2007. Overall, we ceded 50.5% of gross
premiums written for the nine months ended September 30, 2008 compared to 56.8% for the nine months
ended September 30, 2007. The following were changes made to our reinsurance program during the
nine months ended September 30, 2008:
|
|
|
Reduction in the cession percentage on our general property quota share reinsurance
treaty from 55% to 40%. |
|
|
|
|
Renewed our property catastrophe reinsurance treaty, which resulted in ceded written
premiums of $26.1 million. The cost of the property catastrophe reinsurance treaty was
higher than the expiring treaty by approximately $7.0 million. The increased cost of
the property catastrophe reinsurance treaty is principally due to the new treaty
expanding earthquake coverage in the United States and increased exposure due to
changes in our general property quota share reinsurance treaty. |
|
|
|
|
Our international property catastrophe treaty was cancelled and rewritten effective
May 1, 2008. This treaty covers worldwide losses, excluding the United States and
Canada. The total ceded premiums written for the international property catastrophe
treaty was $2.0 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2008 compared to $1.6
million for the nine months ended September 30, 2007. |
|
|
|
|
Purchased an excess-of-loss reinsurance treaty for our general property treaty with
a limit of $15 million excess of $10 million or 10 million excess of 10 million. The
total ceded premiums written for the excess-of-loss treaty was $3.4 million. There was
no excess-of-loss treaty in place during the nine months ended September 30, 2007. |
Net premiums earned decreased $6.3 million, or 4.6%, primarily due the continued earning of
lower net premiums that were written prior to the nine months ended September 30, 2008.
Net losses and loss expenses. Net losses and loss expenses increased by $78.3 million, or
111.4%, for the nine months ended September 30, 2008 compared to the nine months ended September
30, 2007. The increase in net losses and loss expenses was primarily the result of higher than
expected loss activity for the current periods business partially offset by higher net favorable
reserve development. Loss activity in the current periods business included losses and loss
expenses of $6.0 million for flooding in the U.S. Midwest, $30.0 million for the gas pipeline
explosion in Australia, $42.2 million for Hurricane Ike and $7.1 million for Hurricane Gustav.
Overall, our property segment recorded net favorable reserve development of $45.6 million
during the nine months ended September 30, 2008 compared to net favorable reserve development of
$37.3 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2007.
The $45.6 million of net favorable reserve development during the nine months ended September
30, 2008 included the following:
-40-
|
|
|
Net favorable reserve development of $28.4 million, excluding the 2005 windstorms,
was recognized primarily as a result of general property line of business actual loss
emergence being lower than the initial expected loss emergence for the 2003 through 2007
loss years. |
|
|
|
|
We recognized net favorable reserve development of $16.4 million related to the 2005
windstorms and net favorable reserve development of $0.8 million related to the 2004
windstorms. We recognized net favorable reserve development for the 2004 and 2005
windstorms due to lower than anticipated loss activity over the past
several quarters. |
The $37.3 million of net favorable reserve development during the nine months ended September
30, 2007 included the following:
|
|
|
We recognized net favorable reserve development of $30.4 million related to the 2005
windstorms and net favorable reserve development of $4.3 million related to the 2004
windstorms. We recognized the net favorable reserve development for the 2004 and 2005
windstorms due to less than anticipated reported loss activity. |
|
|
|
|
Net favorable reserve development of $2.6 million, excluding the 2004 and 2005
windstorms, which consisted of $28.4 million in favorable reserve development that was
primarily the result of general property business actual loss emergence being lower than
the initial expected loss emergence for the 2003 and 2006 loss years, partially offset
by unfavorable reserve development of $25.8 million that was primarily the result of
increased loss activity for our general property business for the 2004 and 2005 loss
years and our energy business for the 2006 loss year. |
The loss and loss expense ratio for the nine months ended September 30, 2008 was 113.7%
compared to 51.3% for the nine months ended September 30, 2007. Net favorable reserve development
recognized in the nine months ended September 30, 2008 reduced the loss and loss expense ratio by
34.9 percentage points. Thus, the loss and loss expense ratio related to the current periods
business was 148.6%. In comparison, net favorable reserve development recognized in the nine
months ended September 30, 2007 decreased the loss and loss expense ratio by 27.2 percentage
points. Thus, the loss and loss expense ratio for that periods business was 78.5%. The increase
in the loss and loss expense ratio for the current periods business was due to higher than
expected reported loss activity in the current period as well as lower rates on new and renewal
business. During the nine months ended September 30, 2008, we had exposure to a number of
property losses, which included fires, tornadoes, hail storms and floods in various regions of the
United States and in other parts of the world, the gas pipeline explosion in Australia, Hurricanes
Ike and Gustav as well as increased loss activity in our general property and energy lines of
business for the 2008 loss year.
Net paid losses for the nine months ended September 30, 2008 and 2007 were $113.9 million and
$122.9 million, respectively. The decrease in paid losses was due to lower net paid losses related
to the 2004 and 2005 windstorms. During the nine months ended September 30, 2008, approximately
$15.7 million of net losses were paid in relation to the 2004 and 2005 windstorms compared to
approximately $49.9 million during the nine months ended September 30, 2007.
-41-
The table below is a reconciliation of the beginning and ending reserves for losses and loss
expenses for the nine months ended September 30, 2008 and 2007. Losses incurred and paid are
reflected net of reinsurance recoverables.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months |
|
|
|
Ended September 30, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
($ in millions) |
|
Net reserves for losses and loss expenses, January 1 |
|
$ |
360.6 |
|
|
$ |
423.9 |
|
Incurred related to: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current period non-catastrophe |
|
|
108.9 |
|
|
|
107.6 |
|
Current period property catastrophe |
|
|
85.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
Prior period non-catastrophe |
|
|
(28.4 |
) |
|
|
(2.6 |
) |
Prior period property catastrophe |
|
|
(17.2 |
) |
|
|
(34.7 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total incurred |
|
$ |
148.6 |
|
|
$ |
70.3 |
|
Paid related to: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current period non-catastrophe |
|
|
12.9 |
|
|
|
9.1 |
|
Current period property catastrophe |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prior period non-catastrophe |
|
|
85.3 |
|
|
|
63.9 |
|
Prior period property catastrophe |
|
|
15.7 |
|
|
|
49.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total paid |
|
$ |
113.9 |
|
|
$ |
122.9 |
|
Foreign exchange revaluation |
|
|
(5.1 |
) |
|
|
4.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net reserve for losses and loss expenses, September 30 |
|
|
390.2 |
|
|
|
375.3 |
|
Losses and loss expenses recoverable |
|
|
346.9 |
|
|
|
416.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reserve for losses and loss expenses, September 30 |
|
$ |
737.1 |
|
|
$ |
792.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acquisition costs. Acquisition costs increased by $0.4 million for the nine months ended
September 30, 2008 compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2007. The increase was primarily
caused by less ceding commission income as a result of lowering the cession percentage on our
general property quota share treaty. The acquisition cost ratio increased to 0.0% for the nine
months ended September 30, 2008 from negative 0.3% for the same period in 2007.
General and administrative expenses. General and administrative expenses increased by
$6.4 million, or 26.3%, for the nine months ended September 30, 2008 compared to the nine months
ended September 30, 2007. The increase in general and administrative expenses was attributable to
increased salary and employee welfare costs including a one-time expense of $0.5 million for the
reimbursement of forfeited stock compensation and signing bonuses for new executives hired as a
result of the continued expansion of our U.S. operations, increased building-related costs,
increased professional fees and higher costs associated with information technology. The increase
in the general and administrative expense ratio from 17.8% for the nine months ended September 30,
2007 to 23.5% for the same period in 2008 was the result of the factors discussed above, while net
premiums earned declined.
-42-
Casualty Segment
The following table summarizes the underwriting results and associated ratios for the casualty
segment for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2008 and 2007.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months |
|
Nine Months |
|
|
Ended September 30, |
|
Ended September 30, |
|
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
|
($ in millions) |
Revenues |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross premiums written |
|
$ |
140.0 |
|
|
$ |
122.2 |
|
|
$ |
439.3 |
|
|
$ |
435.5 |
|
Net premiums written |
|
|
106.2 |
|
|
|
92.9 |
|
|
|
326.1 |
|
|
|
335.2 |
|
Net premiums earned |
|
|
105.5 |
|
|
|
115.0 |
|
|
|
320.2 |
|
|
|
363.1 |
|
Expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net losses and loss expenses |
|
$ |
46.8 |
|
|
$ |
71.4 |
|
|
$ |
161.7 |
|
|
$ |
222.6 |
|
Acquisition costs |
|
|
2.2 |
|
|
|
2.9 |
|
|
|
10.7 |
|
|
|
14.0 |
|
General and administrative expenses |
|
|
19.9 |
|
|
|
17.9 |
|
|
|
67.8 |
|
|
|
49.9 |
|
Underwriting income |
|
|
36.6 |
|
|
|
22.8 |
|
|
|
80.0 |
|
|
|
76.6 |
|
Ratios |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss and loss expense ratio |
|
|
44.4 |
% |
|
|
62.1 |
% |
|
|
50.5 |
% |
|
|
61.3 |
% |
Acquisition cost ratio |
|
|
2.1 |
|
|
|
2.5 |
|
|
|
3.3 |
|
|
|
3.9 |
|
General and administrative expense ratio |
|
|
18.8 |
|
|
|
15.6 |
|
|
|
21.2 |
|
|
|
13.7 |
|
Expense ratio |
|
|
20.9 |
|
|
|
18.1 |
|
|
|
24.5 |
|
|
|
17.6 |
|
Combined ratio |
|
|
65.3 |
|
|
|
80.2 |
|
|
|
75.0 |
|
|
|
78.9 |
|
Comparison of Three Months Ended September 30, 2008 and 2007
Premiums. Gross premiums written increased $17.8 million, or 14.6%, for the three months
ended September 30, 2008 compared to the same period in 2007. This increase was primarily due to
increased gross premiums written by our U.S. offices, which had increased gross premiums written of
$12.4 million, or 32.1%. Despite the continued growth of our U.S. platform, we still experienced
the non-renewal of business that did not meet our underwriting requirements (which included
inadequate pricing and/or policy terms and conditions), increased
competition and inadequate pricing for new business. We also reduced the amount of gross premiums written for certain
energy classes of business by $1.6 million in response to deteriorating market conditions.
The table below illustrates our gross premiums written by line of business for the three
months ended September 30, 2008 and 2007.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ended September 30, |
|
|
Dollar |
|
|
Percentage |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
Change |
|
|
Change |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
($ in millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
Professional liability |
|
$ |
64.6 |
|
|
$ |
53.3 |
|
|
$ |
11.3 |
|
|
|
21.2 |
% |
General casualty |
|
|
49.9 |
|
|
|
48.0 |
|
|
|
1.9 |
|
|
|
4.0 |
|
Healthcare |
|
|
17.4 |
|
|
|
14.5 |
|
|
|
2.9 |
|
|
|
20.0 |
|
Other |
|
|
8.1 |
|
|
|
6.4 |
|
|
|
1.7 |
|
|
|
26.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
140.0 |
|
|
$ |
122.2 |
|
|
$ |
17.8 |
|
|
|
14.6 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net premiums written increased $13.3 million, or 14.3%, for the three months ended September
30, 2008 compared to the three months ended September 30, 2007. The increase in net premiums
written was due to the increase in gross premiums written. We ceded 24.2% of gross premiums
written for the three months ended September 30, 2008 compared to 24.0% for the three months ended
September 30, 2007. Net premiums earned decreased $9.5 million, or 8.3%, due to the continued
earning of lower net premiums that were written prior to the three months ended September 30, 2008.
Net losses and loss expenses. Net losses and loss expenses decreased by $24.6 million, or
34.5%, for the three months ended September 30, 2008 compared to the three months ended September
30, 2007. The decrease in net losses and loss expenses was primarily due to higher net favorable
reserve development. Overall, our casualty segment recorded net favorable reserve development of
$32.8 million during the three months ended September 30, 2008 compared to net favorable reserve
development of $12.4 million
for the three months ended September 30, 2007.
-43-
Net favorable reserve development of $32.8 million recognized during the three months ended
September 30, 2008 was primarily as a result of general casualty, professional liability and
healthcare lines of business actual loss emergence being lower than the initial expected loss
emergence for the 2002 through 2004 loss years. During the three months ended September 30, 2008,
we adjusted our weighting on actuarial methods utilized for these lines of business and loss years
by increasing the weight given to the Bornhuetter-Ferguson reported loss method than in the
previous blend of the Bornhuetter-Ferguson reported loss method and the expected loss ratio method.
Placing greater reliance on more responsive actuarial methods for certain lines of business and
loss years within our casualty segment is a natural progression as we mature as a company and gain
sufficient historical experience of our own that allows us to further refine our estimate of the
reserve for losses and loss expenses.
The net favorable reserve development of $12.4 million for the three months ended September
30, 2007 included the following:
|
|
|
Favorable reserve development of $8.8 million in our general casualty line of business
primarily for the 2004 and 2005 loss years due to lower than anticipated loss activity. |
|
|
|
|
Favorable reserve development of $2.8 million in our professional liability line of
business for the 2003 loss year due to lower than anticipated loss activity. |
|
|
|
|
Favorable reserve development of $0.8 million in our healthcare line of business for
the 2002 and 2003 loss years. |
The loss and loss expense ratio for the three months ended September 30, 2008 was 44.4%,
compared to 62.1% for the three months ended September 30, 2007. The net favorable reserve
development recognized during the three months ended September 30, 2008 decreased the loss and loss
expense ratio by 31.1 percentage points. Thus, the loss and loss expense ratio related to the
current periods business was 75.5%. Comparatively, the net favorable reserve development
recognized during the three months ended September 30, 2007 decreased the loss and loss expense
ratio by 10.8 percentage points. Thus, the loss and loss expense ratio related to that periods
business was 72.9%. The increase in the loss and loss expense ratio for the current periods
business was due to lower rates on new and renewal policies.
We continue to review the impact of the subprime and credit related downturn on professional
liability insurance policies we write. We have high attachment points for our professional
liability policies, which makes estimating whether losses will exceed our attachment point more
difficult. Based on claims information received to date and our analysis, the average attachment
point for our professional liability policies with potential subprime and credit related exposure
is approximately $144 million with an average limit of $14 million (gross of
reinsurance). Our direct insurance polices with subprime and credit related loss notices may have
the benefit of facultative reinsurance, treaty reinsurance or a combination of both. At this time
we believe, based on the claims information received to date, that our current IBNR is adequate to
meet any potential subprime and credit related losses. We will continue to monitor our reserve for
losses and loss expenses for any new claims information and adjust our reserve for losses and loss
expenses accordingly.
Net paid losses were $56.6 million for the three months ended September 30, 2008 compared to
$21.7 million for the three months ended September 30, 2007.
-44-
The table below is a reconciliation of the beginning and ending reserves for losses and loss
expenses for the three months ended September 30, 2008 and 2007. Losses incurred and paid are
reflected net of reinsurance recoverables.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months |
|
|
|
Ended September 30, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
($ in millions) |
|
Net reserves for losses and loss expenses, July 1 |
|
$ |
1,959.6 |
|
|
$ |
1,782.2 |
|
Incurred related to: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current period non-catastrophe |
|
|
79.6 |
|
|
|
83.8 |
|
Current period catastrophe |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prior period non-catastrophe |
|
|
(32.8 |
) |
|
|
(12.4 |
) |
Prior period catastrophe |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total incurred |
|
$ |
46.8 |
|
|
$ |
71.4 |
|
Paid related to: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current period non-catastrophe |
|
|
0.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
Current period catastrophe |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prior period non-catastrophe |
|
|
55.7 |
|
|
|
21.7 |
|
Prior period catastrophe |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total paid |
|
$ |
56.6 |
|
|
$ |
21.7 |
|
Foreign exchange revaluation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net reserve for losses and loss expenses, September 30 |
|
|
1,949.8 |
|
|
|
1,831.9 |
|
Losses and loss expenses recoverable |
|
|
425.4 |
|
|
|
235.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reserve for losses and loss expenses, September 30 |
|
$ |
2,375.2 |
|
|
$ |
2,067.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acquisition costs. Acquisition costs decreased $0.7 million, or 24.1%, for the three months
ended September 30, 2008 compared to the three months ended September 30, 2007. The decrease was
primarily related to an increase in ceding commission income partially offset by increased premium
taxes and broker commissions. The decrease in the acquisition cost ratio from 2.5% for the three
months ended September 30, 2007 to 2.1% for the three months ended September 30, 2008 was due to
the factors discussed above.
General and administrative expenses. General and administrative expenses increased $2.0
million, or 11.2%, for the three months ended September 30, 2008 compared to the three months ended
September 30, 2007. The increase in general and administrative expenses was attributable to
increased salary and related costs, primarily due to the continue build out of our U.S. operations,
increased building-related costs, increased professional fees and higher costs associated with
information technology. The 3.2 percentage point increase in the general and administrative
expense ratio from 15.6% for the three months ended September 30, 2007 to 18.8% for the same period
in 2008 was primarily a result of the factors discussed above, while net premiums earned declined.
Comparison of Nine Months Ended September 30, 2008 and 2007
Premiums. Gross premiums written increased $3.8 million, or 0.9%, for the nine months ended
September 30, 2008 compared to the same period in 2007. This increase was primarily due to
increased gross premiums written by our U.S. offices, which had increased gross premiums written of
$27.7 million, or 30.1%. This was partially offset by the non-renewal of business that did not
meet our underwriting requirements (which included inadequate pricing and/or policy terms and
conditions), increased competition and inadequate pricing for new business. This was most
noticeable for our Bermuda operations where gross premiums written decreased $23.3 million, or
9.0%. We also reduced the amount of gross premiums written for certain energy classes of business
by $8.2 million in response to deteriorating market conditions.
-45-
The table below illustrates our gross premiums written by line of business for the nine months
ended September 30, 2008 and 2007.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
Dollar |
|
|
Percentage |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
Change |
|
|
Change |
|
|
|
($ in millions) |
|
Professional liability |
|
$ |
205.1 |
|
|
$ |
198.6 |
|
|
$ |
6.5 |
|
|
|
3.3 |
% |
General casualty |
|
|
157.8 |
|
|
|
182.2 |
|
|
|
(24.4 |
) |
|
|
(13.4 |
) |
Healthcare |
|
|
57.4 |
|
|
|
44.8 |
|
|
|
12.6 |
|
|
|
28.1 |
|
Other |
|
|
19.0 |
|
|
|
9.9 |
|
|
|
9.1 |
|
|
|
91.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
439.3 |
|
|
$ |
435.5 |
|
|
$ |
3.8 |
|
|
|
0.9 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net premiums written decreased $9.1 million, or 2.7%, for the nine months ended September 30,
2008 compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2007. We ceded 25.8% of gross premiums
written for the nine months ended September 30, 2008 compared to 23.0% for the nine months ended
September 30, 2007. The percentage of premiums ceded were higher for each of our lines of business
during the nine months ended September 30, 2008 compared to the nine months ended September 30,
2007. Net premiums earned decreased $42.9 million, or 11.8%, due to the continued earning of lower
net premiums that were written prior to the nine months ended September 30, 2008.
Net losses and loss expenses. Net losses and loss expenses decreased by $60.9 million, or
27.4%, for the nine months ended September 30, 2008 compared to the nine months ended September 30,
2007. The decrease in net losses and loss expenses was primarily due to higher net favorable
reserve development. Overall, our casualty segment recorded net favorable reserve development of
$80.0 million during the nine months ended September 30, 2008 compared to net favorable reserve
development of $42.2 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2007.
The net favorable reserve development of $80.0 million for the nine months ended September 30,
2008 included the following:
|
|
|
Favorable reserve development of $87.1 million related to low loss emergence primarily
in our general casualty and healthcare lines of business for the 2002 through 2004 loss
years and our professional liability line of business for the 2003 and 2004 loss years. |
|
|
|
|
Unfavorable reserve development of $7.1 million due to higher than anticipated loss
emergence in our professional liability line of business for the 2002 loss year and our
general casualty line of business for the 2006 and 2007 loss years. |
The net favorable reserve development of $42.2 million for the nine months ended September 30,
2007 included the following:
|
|
|
Favorable reserve development of $126.5 million related to low loss emergence primarily
in our professional liability and healthcare lines of business for the 2003, 2004 and 2006
loss years and general casualty line of business for the 2004 loss year. |
|
|
|
|
Unfavorable reserve development of $84.3 million due to higher than anticipated loss
emergence in our general casualty line of business for the 2003 and 2005 loss years and in
our professional liability line for the 2002 loss year. |
The loss and loss expense ratio for the nine months ended September 30, 2008 was 50.5%,
compared to 61.3% for the nine months ended September 30, 2007. The net favorable reserve
development recognized during the nine months ended September 30, 2008 decreased the loss and loss
expense ratio by 25.0 percentage points. Thus, the loss and loss expense ratio related to the
current periods business was 75.5%. Comparatively, the net favorable reserve development
recognized during the nine months ended September 30, 2007 decreased the loss and loss expense
ratio by 11.6 percentage points. Thus, the loss and loss expense ratio related to that periods
business was 72.9%. The increase in the loss and loss expense ratio for the current periods
business was due to lower rates on new and renewal policies.
-46-
Net paid losses were $90.1 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2008 compared to
$81.9 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2007.
The table below is a reconciliation of the beginning and ending reserves for losses and loss
expenses for the nine months ended September 30, 2008 and 2007. Losses incurred and paid are
reflected net of reinsurance recoverables.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months |
|
|
|
Ended September 30, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
($ in millions) |
|
Net reserves for losses and loss expenses, January 1 |
|
$ |
1,878.2 |
|
|
$ |
1,691.2 |
|
Incurred related to: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current period non-catastrophe |
|
|
241.7 |
|
|
|
264.8 |
|
Current period catastrophe |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prior period non-catastrophe |
|
|
(80.0 |
) |
|
|
(42.2 |
) |
Prior period catastrophe |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total incurred |
|
$ |
161.7 |
|
|
$ |
222.6 |
|
Paid related to: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current period non-catastrophe |
|
|
0.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
Current period catastrophe |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prior period non-catastrophe |
|
|
89.2 |
|
|
|
81.9 |
|
Prior period catastrophe |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total paid |
|
$ |
90.1 |
|
|
$ |
81.9 |
|
Foreign exchange revaluation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net reserve for losses and loss expenses, September 30 |
|
|
1,949.8 |
|
|
|
1,831.9 |
|
Losses and loss expenses recoverable |
|
|
425.4 |
|
|
|
235.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reserve for losses and loss expenses, September 30 |
|
$ |
2,375.2 |
|
|
$ |
2,067.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acquisition costs. Acquisition costs decreased $3.3 million, or 23.6%, for the nine months
ended September 30, 2008 compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2007. The decrease was
primarily related to an increase in ceding commission income with the increase in reinsurance we
purchased. The decrease in the acquisition cost ratio from 3.9% for the nine months ended
September 30, 2007 to 3.3% for the nine months ended September 30, 2008 was due to the increase in
ceding commission received partially offset by increased premium taxes and broker commissions.
General and administrative expenses. General and administrative expenses increased $17.9
million, or 35.9%, for the nine months ended September 30, 2008 compared to the nine months ended
September 30, 2007. The increase in general and administrative expenses was attributable to
increased salary and related costs including a one-time expense of $2.3 million for the
reimbursement of forfeited stock compensation and signing bonuses for new executives hired as a
result of the continued expansion of our U.S. operations, increased building-related costs,
increased professional fees and higher costs associated with information technology. The 7.5
percentage point increase in the general and administrative expense ratio from 13.7% for the nine
months ended September 30, 2007 to 21.2% for the same period in 2008 was primarily a result of the
factors discussed above, while net premiums earned declined.
-47-
Reinsurance Segment
The following table summarizes the underwriting results and associated ratios for the
reinsurance segment for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2008 and 2007.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months |
|
Nine Months |
|
|
Ended September 30, |
|
Ended September 30, |
|
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
|
($ in millions) |
Revenues |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross premiums written |
|
$ |
93.5 |
|
|
$ |
93.8 |
|
|
$ |
419.9 |
|
|
$ |
491.2 |
|
Net premiums written |
|
|
92.3 |
|
|
|
94.0 |
|
|
|
418.3 |
|
|
|
491.1 |
|
Net premiums earned |
|
|
123.6 |
|
|
|
124.4 |
|
|
|
363.0 |
|
|
|
373.2 |
|
Expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net losses and loss expenses |
|
$ |
58.0 |
|
|
$ |
72.6 |
|
|
$ |
187.3 |
|
|
$ |
222.5 |
|
Acquisition costs |
|
|
24.0 |
|
|
|
27.1 |
|
|
|
71.0 |
|
|
|
76.6 |
|
General and administrative expenses |
|
|
11.7 |
|
|
|
9.7 |
|
|
|
31.9 |
|
|
|
29.5 |
|
Underwriting income |
|
|
29.9 |
|
|
|
15.0 |
|
|
|
72.8 |
|
|
|
44.6 |
|
Ratios |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss and loss expense ratio |
|
|
46.9 |
% |
|
|
58.4 |
% |
|
|
51.6 |
% |
|
|
59.6 |
% |
Acquisition cost ratio |
|
|
19.4 |
|
|
|
21.8 |
|
|
|
19.6 |
|
|
|
20.5 |
|
General and administrative expense ratio |
|
|
9.5 |
|
|
|
7.8 |
|
|
|
8.8 |
|
|
|
7.9 |
|
Expense ratio |
|
|
28.9 |
|
|
|
29.6 |
|
|
|
28.4 |
|
|
|
28.4 |
|
Combined ratio |
|
|
75.8 |
|
|
|
88.0 |
|
|
|
80.0 |
|
|
|
88.0 |
|
Comparison of Three Months Ended September 30, 2008 and 2007
Premiums. Gross premiums written decreased $0.3 million, or 0.3%, for the three months ended
September 30, 2008 compared to the same period in 2007. The decrease in gross premiums written was
primarily the result of the non-renewal of business, particularly in the professional liability
reinsurance line of business, that did not meet our underwriting requirements (which included
inadequate pricing and/or contract terms and conditions), increased
competition and inadequate pricing for new business. This was partially offset by higher adjustments on estimated
premiums of $1.7 million during the three months ended September 30, 2008 compared to the three
months ended September 30, 2007, and $2.7 million in reinstatement premiums related to Hurricane
Ike. We recognized net upward adjustments of $2.8 million during the three months ended September
30, 2008 compared to net upward adjustments of $1.1 million during the three months ended September
30, 2007.
During the three months ended September 30, 2008, our Bermuda and U.S. reinsurance operations
wrote gross premiums written of $51.8 million and $41.7 million, respectively. The gross premiums
written by our U.S. reinsurance operations, which commenced business in April 2008, included the
renewal of certain treaties previously written in Bermuda of $17.6 million as well as new business,
particularly in the general casualty line of business.
The table below illustrates our gross premiums written by line of business for the three
months ended September 30, 2008 and 2007.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
Dollar |
|
|
Percentage |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
Change |
|
|
Change |
|
|
|
($ in millions) |
|
General casualty reinsurance |
|
$ |
33.5 |
|
|
$ |
16.0 |
|
|
$ |
17.5 |
|
|
|
109.4 |
% |
Property reinsurance |
|
|
22.5 |
|
|
|
18.9 |
|
|
|
3.6 |
|
|
|
19.0 |
|
Professional liability reinsurance |
|
|
21.6 |
|
|
|
45.3 |
|
|
|
(23.7 |
) |
|
|
(52.3 |
) |
Facultative reinsurance |
|
|
9.7 |
|
|
|
9.8 |
|
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
|
|
(1.0 |
) |
International reinsurance |
|
|
5.0 |
|
|
|
3.5 |
|
|
|
1.5 |
|
|
|
42.9 |
|
Other |
|
|
1.2 |
|
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
|
0.9 |
|
|
|
300.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
93.5 |
|
|
$ |
93.8 |
|
|
$ |
(0.3 |
) |
|
|
(0.3 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net premiums written decreased by $1.7 million, or 1.8%, which is consistent with the decrease
in gross premiums written. Net
-48-
premiums earned decreased $0.8 million, or 0.6%, primarily as a result of lower net premiums
written. Premiums related to our reinsurance business earn at a slower rate than those related to
our direct insurance business. Direct insurance premiums typically earn ratably over the term of a
policy. Reinsurance premiums under a proportional contract are typically earned over the same
period as the underlying policies, or risks, covered by the contract. As a result, the earning
pattern of a proportional contract may extend up to 24 months, reflecting the inception dates of
the underlying policies. Property catastrophe premiums and premiums for other treaties written on
a losses occurring basis earn ratably over the term of the reinsurance contract.
Net losses and loss expenses. Net losses and loss expenses decreased by $14.6 million, or
20.1%, for the three months ended September 30, 2008 compared to the three months ended September
30, 2007. The decrease in net losses and loss expenses was primarily due to higher net favorable
reserve development recognized during the three months ended September 30, 2008 compared to the
three months ended September 30, 2007, partially offset by losses and loss expenses of $19.8
million and $2.5 million related to Hurricanes Ike and Gustav, respectively. We were not impacted
by any significant catastrophes during the three months ended September 30, 2007. Overall, our
reinsurance segment recorded net favorable reserve development of $39.4 million during the three
months ended September 30, 2008 compared to net favorable reserve development of $3.2 million for
the three months ended September 30, 2007.
The net favorable reserve development of $39.4 million for the three months ended
September 30, 2008 included the following:
|
|
|
Net favorable reserve development of $14.7 million for our professional liability
reinsurance, general casualty reinsurance, accident and health reinsurance and facultative
reinsurance lines of business. The net favorable reserve development for these lines of
business was primarily the result of actual loss emergence being lower than the initial
expected loss emergence for the 2003 through 2005 loss years. During the three months
ended September 30, 2008, we began to adjust our weighting on actuarial methods utilized
for the professional liability reinsurance, general casualty reinsurance and facultative
reinsurance lines of business and loss years from using the expected loss ratio method to a
blend of the Bornhuetter-Ferguson reported loss method and the expected loss ratio method. |
|
|
|
|
Net favorable reserve development of $24.7 million for our property reinsurance and
international reinsurance lines of business was primarily the result of actual loss
emergence being lower than the initial expected loss emergence for the 2002 through 2007
loss years. The net favorable reserve development for the property reinsurance and
international reinsurance lines of business included $6.5 million of unfavorable reserve
development related to the 2004 and 2005 windstorms due to recent loss activity. |
The net favorable reserve development of $3.2 million during the three months ended
September 30, 2007 was related to the 2004 and 2005 windstorms. We recognized favorable reserve
development of $2.4 million related to the 2004 windstorms and favorable reserve development of
$0.8 million related to the 2005 windstorms.
The loss and loss expense ratio for the three months ended September 30, 2008 was 46.9%,
compared to 58.4% for the three months ended September 30, 2007.
Net favorable reserve development
recognized during the three months ended September 30, 2008 reduced the loss and loss expense ratio
by 31.9 percentage points. Thus, the loss and loss expense ratio related to the current periods
business was 78.8%. In comparison, net favorable reserve development recognized in the three months
ended September 30, 2007 reduced the loss and loss expense ratio by 2.6 percentage points. Thus,
the loss and loss expense ratio related to that periods business was 61.0%. Included in the
current periods business were net incurred losses and loss expenses of $22.3 million related to
Hurricanes Ike and Gustav.
We continue to review the impact of the subprime and credit related downturn on professional
liability reinsurance contracts we write. We have high attachment points for our professional
liability contracts, which makes estimating whether losses will exceed our attachment point more
difficult. Based on claims information received to date and our analysis, the average attachment
point for our professional liability reinsurance contracts with potential subprime and credit
related exposure is approximately $101 million with an average limit of $1.7 million. At this time we believe, based on the claims information received to date, that our
current IBNR is adequate to meet any potential subprime and credit related losses. We will
continue to monitor our reserve for losses and loss expenses for any new claims information and
adjust our reserve for losses and loss expenses accordingly.
Net paid losses were $44.4 million for the three months ended September 30, 2008 compared to
$28.6 million for the three months ended September 30, 2007. The increase in paid losses was due
to higher net paid losses related to the 2004 and 2005 windstorms and higher paid losses in our
professional liability reinsurance line of business. During the three months ended September 30,
2008, approximately $7.1 million of net losses were paid in relation to the 2004 and 2005
windstorms compared to approximately
$4.1 million during the three months ended September 30, 2007.
-49-
The table below is a reconciliation of the beginning and ending reserves for losses and loss
expenses for the three months ended September 30, 2008 and 2007. Losses incurred and paid are
reflected net of reinsurance recoverables.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
($ in millions) |
|
Net reserves for losses and loss expenses, July 1 |
|
$ |
1,067.9 |
|
|
$ |
906.4 |
|
Incurred related to: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current period non-catastrophe |
|
|
75.1 |
|
|
|
75.8 |
|
Current period property catastrophe |
|
|
22.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
Prior period non-catastrophe |
|
|
(45.9 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Prior period property catastrophe |
|
|
6.5 |
|
|
|
(3.2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total incurred |
|
$ |
58.0 |
|
|
$ |
72.6 |
|
Paid related to: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current period non-catastrophe |
|
|
2.2 |
|
|
|
1.7 |
|
Current period property catastrophe |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prior period non-catastrophe |
|
|
35.1 |
|
|
|
22.8 |
|
Prior period property catastrophe |
|
|
7.1 |
|
|
|
4.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total paid |
|
$ |
44.4 |
|
|
$ |
28.6 |
|
Foreign exchange revaluation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net reserve for losses and loss expenses, September 30 |
|
|
1,081.5 |
|
|
|
950.4 |
|
Losses and loss expenses recoverable |
|
|
4.9 |
|
|
|
21.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reserve for losses and loss expenses, September 30 |
|
$ |
1,086.4 |
|
|
$ |
972.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acquisition costs. Acquisition costs decreased by $3.1 million, or 11.4%, for the three
months ended September 30, 2008 compared to the three months ended September 30, 2007 primarily as
a result of the related decrease in net premiums earned. The acquisition cost ratio decreased to
19.4% for the three months ended September 30, 2008 compared to 21.8% for the three months ended
September 30, 2007 primarily due to lower estimated acquisition costs for certain international
reinsurance treaties.
General and administrative expenses. General and administrative expenses increased $2.0
million, or 20.6%, for the three months ended September 30, 2008 compared to the three months ended
September 30, 2007. The increase in general and administrative expenses was attributable to
increased salary and related costs, increased building-related costs, increased professional fees
and higher costs associated with information technology. The 1.7 percentage point increase in the
general and administrative expense ratio from 7.8% for the three months ended September 30, 2007 to
9.5% for the three months ended September 30, 2008 was primarily a result of the factors discussed
above, while net premiums earned declined.
Comparison of Nine Months Ended September 30, 2008 and 2007
Premiums. Gross premiums written decreased $71.3 million, or 14.5%, for the nine months ended
September 30, 2008 compared to the same period in 2007. The decrease in gross premiums written was
primarily due to non-renewal of business that did not meet our underwriting requirements (which
included inadequate pricing and/or contract terms and conditions), increased
competition and inadequate pricing for new business, net downward adjustments on estimated premiums and some cedents
purchasing less reinsurance. Adjustments on estimated premiums were lower by approximately $16.3
million during the nine months ended September 30, 2008 compared to the nine months ended September
30, 2007. We recognized net downward adjustments of $5.2 million during the nine months ended
September 30, 2008 compared to net upward adjustments of $11.1 million during the nine months ended
September 30, 2007. The impact of some cedents purchasing less reinsurance resulted in lower
gross premiums written of approximately $12.0 million.
During the nine months ended September 30, 2008, our Bermuda and U.S. reinsurance operations
wrote gross premiums written of $334.5 million and $85.4 million, respectively. The gross premiums
written by our U.S. reinsurance operations, which commenced business in April 2008, included the
renewal of certain treaties previously written in Bermuda of $52.5 million.
The table below illustrates our gross premiums written by line of business for the nine months
ended September 30, 2008 and 2007.
-50-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
Dollar |
|
|
Percentage |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
Change |
|
|
Change |
|
|
|
($ in millions) |
|
Professional liability reinsurance |
|
$ |
129.7 |
|
|
$ |
192.0 |
|
|
$ |
(62.3 |
) |
|
|
(32.4 |
)% |
General casualty reinsurance |
|
|
104.7 |
|
|
|
112.8 |
|
|
|
(8.1 |
) |
|
|
(7.2 |
) |
Property reinsurance |
|
|
77.6 |
|
|
|
82.5 |
|
|
|
(4.9 |
) |
|
|
(5.9 |
) |
International reinsurance |
|
|
76.1 |
|
|
|
69.7 |
|
|
|
6.4 |
|
|
|
9.2 |
|
Facultative reinsurance |
|
|
20.6 |
|
|
|
26.1 |
|
|
|
(5.5 |
) |
|
|
(21.1 |
) |
Other |
|
|
11.2 |
|
|
|
8.1 |
|
|
|
3.1 |
|
|
|
38.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
419.9 |
|
|
$ |
491.2 |
|
|
$ |
(71.3 |
) |
|
|
(14.5 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net premiums written decreased by $72.8 million, or 14.8%, which was consistent with the
decrease in gross premiums written. Net premiums earned decreased $10.2 million, or 2.7%, as a result of lower net
premiums written.
Net losses and loss expenses. Net losses and loss expenses decreased by $35.2 million, or
15.8%, for the nine months ended September 30, 2008 compared to the nine months ended September 30,
2007. The decrease in net losses and loss expenses was primarily due to higher net favorable
reserve development recognized during the nine months ended September 30, 2008 compared to the nine
months ended September 30, 2007, partially offset by loss and loss expenses incurred of $22.3
million related to Hurricanes Ike and Gustav and $5.0 million related to the flooding in the U.S.
Midwest. Overall, our reinsurance segment recorded net favorable reserve development of $64.2
million during the nine months ended September 30, 2008 compared to net favorable reserve
development of $7.7 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2007.
The net favorable reserve development of $64.2 million for the nine months ended September 30,
2008 included the following:
|
|
|
Net favorable reserve development of $14.7 million for our professional liability
reinsurance, general casualty reinsurance, accident and health reinsurance and facultative
reinsurance lines of business. The net favorable reserve development for these lines of
business was primarily the result of actual loss emergence being lower than the initial
expected loss emergence for the 2003 through 2005 loss years. |
|
|
|
|
Net favorable reserve development of $33.3 million, excluding the 2004 and 2005
windstorms, for our property reinsurance and international reinsurance lines of business
was primarily the result of actual loss emergence being lower than the initial expected
loss emergence for the 2002 through 2007 loss years. |
|
|
|
|
We recognized net favorable development of $17.0 million related to the 2005 windstorms
and net unfavorable reserve development of $0.8 million related to the 2004 windstorms. We
recognized net favorable reserve development for the 2005 windstorms due to lower than
anticipated loss activity over the past several months. |
The net favorable reserve development of $7.7 million for the nine months ended September 30,
2007 was comprised of the following:
|
|
|
Net favorable reserve development of $4.4 million related to the 2004 and 2005
windstorms. We recognized favorable reserve development of $4.7 million related to the 2005
windstorms and unfavorable reserve development of $0.3 million related to the 2004
windstorms. |
|
|
|
|
Net favorable reserve development of $1.6 million related to low loss emergence in our
property reinsurance lines of business for the 2004 and 2005 loss years. |
|
|
|
|
Net favorable reserve development of $1.7 million related to low loss emergence in our
accident and health reinsurance line of business for the 2004 and 2005 loss years. |
-51-
The loss and loss expense ratio for the nine months ended September 30, 2008 was 51.6%
compared to 59.6% for the nine
months ended September 30, 2007. Net favorable reserve development recognized during the nine
months ended September 30, 2008 reduced the loss and loss expense ratio by 17.7 percentage points.
Thus, the loss and loss expense ratio related to the current periods business was 69.3%. In
comparison, net favorable reserve development recognized in the nine months ended September 30,
2007 reduced the loss and loss expense ratio by 2.0 percentage points. Thus, the loss and loss
expense ratio related to that periods business was 61.6%. The increase in the loss and loss
expense ratio for the current periods business was due to lower rates on new and renewal
contracts, and higher than expected reported loss activity including net losses and loss expenses
recognized of $5.0 million for the floods in the U.S. Midwest and $22.3 million for Hurricanes Ike
and Gustav.
Net paid losses were $104.0 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2008 compared to
$104.9 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2007.
The table below is a reconciliation of the beginning and ending reserves for losses and loss
expenses for the nine months ended September 30, 2008 and 2007. Losses incurred and paid are
reflected net of reinsurance recoverables.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
($ in millions) |
|
Net reserves for losses and loss expenses, January 1 |
|
$ |
998.2 |
|
|
$ |
832.8 |
|
Incurred related to: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current period non-catastrophe |
|
|
224.2 |
|
|
|
230.2 |
|
Current period property catastrophe |
|
|
27.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
Prior period non-catastrophe |
|
|
(48.0 |
) |
|
|
(3.3 |
) |
Prior period property catastrophe |
|
|
(16.2 |
) |
|
|
(4.4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total incurred |
|
$ |
187.3 |
|
|
$ |
222.5 |
|
Paid related to: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current period non-catastrophe |
|
|
8.0 |
|
|
|
1.8 |
|
Current period property catastrophe |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prior period non-catastrophe |
|
|
73.8 |
|
|
|
78.6 |
|
Prior period property catastrophe |
|
|
22.2 |
|
|
|
24.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total paid |
|
$ |
104.0 |
|
|
$ |
104.9 |
|
Foreign exchange revaluation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net reserve for losses and loss expenses, September 30 |
|
|
1,081.5 |
|
|
|
950.4 |
|
Losses and loss expenses recoverable |
|
|
4.9 |
|
|
|
21.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reserve for losses and loss expenses, September 30 |
|
$ |
1,086.4 |
|
|
$ |
972.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acquisition costs. Acquisition costs decreased by $5.6 million, or 7.3%, for the nine months
ended September 30, 2008 compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2007 primarily as a result
of the related decrease in net premiums earned. The acquisition cost ratio of 19.6% for the
nine-month period ended September 30, 2008 was in line with the 20.5% acquisition cost ratio for
the nine-month period ended September 30, 2007.
General and administrative expenses. General and administrative expenses increased $2.4
million, or 8.1%, for the nine months ended September 30, 2008 compared to the nine months ended
September 30, 2007. The increase was primarily the result of a one-time expense of $1.2 million
for the reimbursement of forfeited stock compensation and signing bonuses for new executives hired
as a result of the continued expansion of our U.S. operations and increased building-related costs,
increased professional fees and higher costs associated with information technology partially
offset by lower salary and related costs. The 0.9 percentage point increase in the general and
administrative expense ratio from 7.9% for the nine months ended September 30, 2007 to 8.8% for the
nine months ended September 30, 2008 was primarily a result of the factors discussed above, while
net premiums earned decreased.
-52-
Reserves for Losses and Loss Expenses
Reserves for losses and loss expenses as of September 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007 were
comprised of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property |
|
|
Casualty |
|
|
Reinsurance |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
Sep. 30, |
|
|
Dec. 31, |
|
|
Sep. 30, |
|
|
Dec. 31, |
|
|
Sep. 30, |
|
|
Dec. 31, |
|
|
Sep. 30, |
|
|
Dec. 31, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
($ in millions) |
|
Case reserves |
|
$ |
462.1 |
|
|
$ |
480.0 |
|
|
$ |
296.6 |
|
|
$ |
270.7 |
|
|
$ |
248.1 |
|
|
$ |
212.7 |
|
|
$ |
1,006.9 |
|
|
$ |
963.4 |
|
IBNR |
|
|
275.0 |
|
|
|
280.7 |
|
|
|
2,078.6 |
|
|
|
1,872.0 |
|
|
|
838.3 |
|
|
|
803.7 |
|
|
|
3,191.9 |
|
|
|
2,956.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reserve for losses
and loss expenses |
|
|
737.1 |
|
|
|
760.7 |
|
|
|
2,375.2 |
|
|
|
2,142.7 |
|
|
|
1,086.4 |
|
|
|
1,016.4 |
|
|
|
4,198.8 |
|
|
|
3,919.8 |
|
Reinsurance
recoverables |
|
|
(346.9 |
) |
|
|
(400.1 |
) |
|
|
(425.4 |
) |
|
|
(264.5 |
) |
|
|
(4.9 |
) |
|
|
(18.2 |
) |
|
|
(777.3 |
) |
|
|
(682.8 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net reserve for
losses and loss
expenses |
|
$ |
390.2 |
|
|
$ |
360.6 |
|
|
$ |
1,949.8 |
|
|
$ |
1,878.2 |
|
|
$ |
1,081.5 |
|
|
$ |
998.2 |
|
|
$ |
3,421.5 |
|
|
$ |
3,237.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Included in the increase in reserves for losses and loss expenses for the casualty segment
from December 31, 2007 to September 30, 2008 was the reserves for losses and loss expenses assumed
in connection with the acquisition of Finial Insurance Company, now known as Allied World
Reinsurance Company. As a part of the acquisition, we assumed case reserves of $56.4 million and
IBNR of $48.5 million. The case reserves and IBNR assumed were 100% ceded to National Indemnity
Company, an affiliate of Berkshire Hathaway Inc., resulting in an increase of $104.9 million in
reinsurance recoverables. Please refer to Note 4 of the notes to the unaudited condensed
consolidated financial statements for additional information regarding the acquisition of Finial
Insurance Company. As of September 30, 2008, the case reserves and IBNR assumed from Finial
Insurance Company were $49.6 million and $44.2 million, respectively.
We participate in certain lines of business where claims may not be reported for many years.
Accordingly, management does not solely rely upon reported claims on these lines for estimating
ultimate liabilities, but also uses statistical and actuarial methods to estimate expected ultimate
losses and loss expenses. Loss reserves do not represent an exact calculation of liability.
Rather, loss reserves are estimates of what we expect the ultimate resolution and administration of
claims will cost. These estimates are based on various factors including underwriters
expectations about loss experience, actuarial analysis, comparisons with the results of industry
benchmarks and loss experience to date. Loss reserve estimates are refined as experience develops
and as claims are reported and resolved. Establishing an appropriate level of loss reserves is an
inherently uncertain process. Ultimate losses and loss expenses may differ from our reserves,
possibly by material amounts.
The following tables provide our ranges of loss and loss expense reserve estimates by business
segment as of September 30, 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reserve for Losses and Loss Expenses |
|
|
Gross of Reinsurance Recoverable(1) |
|
|
Carried |
|
Low |
|
High |
|
|
Reserves |
|
Estimate |
|
Estimate |
|
|
($ in millions) |
Property |
|
$ |
737.1 |
|
|
$ |
605.6 |
|
|
$ |
998.4 |
|
Casualty |
|
|
2,375.2 |
|
|
|
1,734.9 |
|
|
|
2,670.9 |
|
Reinsurance |
|
|
1,086.4 |
|
|
|
764.2 |
|
|
|
1,337.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reserve for Losses and Loss Expenses |
|
|
Net of Reinsurance Recoverable(1) |
|
|
Carried |
|
Low |
|
High |
|
|
Reserves |
|
Estimate |
|
Estimate |
|
|
($ in millions) |
Property |
|
$ |
390.2 |
|
|
$ |
327.7 |
|
|
$ |
543.4 |
|
Casualty |
|
|
1,949.8 |
|
|
|
1,396.7 |
|
|
|
2,201.9 |
|
Reinsurance |
|
|
1,081.5 |
|
|
|
760.0 |
|
|
|
1,332.8 |
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
For statistical reasons, it is not appropriate to add together the ranges of each
business segment in an effort to determine the low and high range around the consolidated
loss reserves. |
-53-
Our range for each business segment was determined by utilizing multiple actuarial loss
reserving methods along with various assumptions of reporting patterns and expected loss ratios by
loss year. The various outcomes of these techniques were combined to determine a reasonable range
of required loss and loss expense reserves.
Our selection of the actual carried reserves has typically been above the midpoint of the
range. We believe that we should be conservative in our reserving practices due to the lengthy
reporting patterns and relatively large limits of net liability for any one risk of our direct
excess casualty business and of our casualty reinsurance business. Thus, due to this uncertainty
regarding estimates for reserve for losses and loss expenses, we have historically carried our
consolidated reserve for losses and loss expenses, net of reinsurance recoverable, above the
midpoint of the low and high estimates for the consolidated net losses and loss expenses. These
long-tail lines of business include our entire casualty segment, as well as the general casualty,
professional liability, facultative casualty and the international casualty components of our
reinsurance segment. We believe that relying on the more conservative actuarial indications is
prudent for these lines of business. For a discussion of loss and loss expense reserve estimate,
please see Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
OperationsCritical Accounting PoliciesReserve for Losses and Loss Expenses in our Annual Report
on Form 10-K filed with the SEC on February 29, 2008.
Reinsurance Recoverable
The following table illustrates our reinsurance recoverable as of September 30, 2008 and
December 31, 2007:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reinsurance Recoverable |
|
|
|
As of |
|
|
As of |
|
|
|
Sep. 30, |
|
|
Dec. 31, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
($ in millions) |
|
Ceded case reserves |
|
$ |
309.7 |
|
|
$ |
289.2 |
|
Ceded IBNR reserves |
|
|
467.6 |
|
|
|
393.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reinsurance recoverable |
|
$ |
777.3 |
|
|
$ |
682.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Included in the increase in ceded case reserves and ceded IBNR from December 31, 2007 to
September 30, 2008 was the reinsurance recoverable recorded for the reserves assumed as a part of
the acquisition of Finial Insurance Company. As a part of the acquisition, we assumed case
reserves of $56.4 million and IBNR of $48.5 million. The case reserves and IBNR assumed were 100%
ceded to National Indemnity Company, resulting in additional reinsurance recoverables of $104.9
million. Please refer to Note 4 of the notes to the unaudited condensed consolidated financial
statements for additional information regarding the acquisition of Finial Insurance Company. As of
September 30, 2008, the reinsurance recoverables from National Indemnity Company were $93.8
million. We remain obligated for amounts ceded in the event our reinsurers do not meet their
obligations. Accordingly, we have evaluated the reinsurers that are providing reinsurance
protection to us and will continue to monitor their credit ratings and financial stability. We
generally have the right to terminate our treaty reinsurance contracts at any time, upon prior
written notice to the reinsurer, under specified circumstances, including the assignment to the
reinsurer by A.M. Best of a financial strength rating of less than A-. Approximately 98% of
ceded case reserves as of September 30, 2008 were recoverable from reinsurers who had an A.M. Best
rating of A- or higher. Included in these amounts were $8.4 million of recoverables on ceded
case reserves from affiliates of American International Group, Inc.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
General
As of September 30, 2008, our shareholders equity was $2.3 billion, a 1.5% increase compared
to $2.2 billion as of December 31, 2007. The increase was primarily the result of net income for
the nine-month period ended September 30, 2008 of $163.8 million partially offset by unrealized
losses of $129.7 million during the nine months ended September 30, 2008. On January 1, 2008, we
adopted FAS 159 and elected the fair value option for our hedge fund investments. Upon adoption of
FAS 159, we reclassified the net unrealized gain related to the hedge funds of $26.3 million from
accumulated other comprehensive income and recorded a cumulative-effect adjustment in retained
earnings. Any subsequent change in the fair value of our hedge fund investments will be recognized
in the consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income and included in net realized
investment gains (losses). Please refer to Note 7 of the notes to our unaudited condensed
consolidated financial statements regarding our adoption of FAS 159.
-54-
Holdings is a holding company and transacts no business of its own. Cash flows to Holdings
may comprise dividends, advances and loans from its subsidiary companies. Holdings is therefore
reliant on receiving dividends and other permitted distributions from its subsidiaries to make
principal, interest and/or dividend payments on its senior notes and common shares.
Restrictions and Specific Requirements
The jurisdictions in which our insurance and reinsurance subsidiaries are licensed to write
business impose regulations requiring companies to maintain or meet various defined statutory
ratios, including solvency and liquidity requirements. Some jurisdictions also place restrictions
on the declaration and payment of dividends and other distributions.
The payment of dividends from Holdings Bermuda domiciled insurance subsidiary is, under
certain circumstances, limited under Bermuda law, which requires our Bermuda insurance subsidiary
to maintain certain measures of solvency and liquidity. Holdings U.S. domiciled subsidiaries are
subject to significant regulatory restrictions limiting their ability to declare and pay dividends.
In particular, payments of dividends by Allied World Assurance Company (U.S.) Inc., Allied World
National Assurance Company and Allied World Reinsurance Company are subject to restrictions on
statutory surplus pursuant to Delaware law, New Hampshire law and New Jersey law, respectively.
Each state requires prior regulatory approval of any payment of extraordinary dividends. In
addition, Allied World Assurance Company (Europe) Limited and Allied World Assurance Company
(Reinsurance) Limited are subject to significant regulatory restrictions limiting their ability to
declare and pay any dividends without the consent of the Irish Financial Services Regulatory
Authority. We also have insurance subsidiaries that are the parent company for other insurance
subsidiaries, which means that dividends and other distributions will be subject to multiple layers
of regulations as funds are pushed up to Holdings. The inability of the subsidiaries of Holdings
to pay dividends and other permitted distributions could have a material adverse effect on
Holdings cash requirements and ability to make principal, interest and dividend payments on its
senior notes and common shares.
Holdings insurance subsidiary in Bermuda, Allied World Assurance Company, Ltd, is neither
licensed nor admitted as an insurer, nor is it accredited as a reinsurer, in any jurisdiction in
the United States. As a result, it is required to post collateral security with respect to any
reinsurance liabilities it assumes from ceding insurers domiciled in the United States in order for
U.S. ceding companies to obtain credit on their U.S. statutory financial statements with respect to
insurance liabilities ceded to them. Under applicable statutory provisions, the security
arrangements may be in the form of letters of credit, reinsurance trusts maintained by trustees or
funds-withheld arrangements where assets are held by the ceding company.
At this time, Allied World Assurance Company, Ltd uses trust accounts primarily to meet
security requirements for inter-company and certain related-party reinsurance transactions. We
also have cash and cash equivalents and investments on deposit with various state or government
insurance departments or pledged in favor of ceding companies in order to comply with relevant
insurance regulations. As of September 30, 2008, total trust account deposits were $698.3 million
compared to $802.7 million as of December 31, 2007. In addition, Allied World Assurance Company,
Ltd currently has access to up to $1.55 billion in letters of credit under two letter of credit
facilities, one with Citibank Europe plc and one with a syndication of lenders described below.
These facilities are used to provide security to reinsureds and are collateralized by us, at least
to the extent of letters of credit outstanding at any given time. As of September 30, 2008 and
December 31, 2007, there were outstanding letters of credit totaling $908.0 million and
$922.2 million, respectively, under the two facilities. Collateral committed to support the letter
of credit facilities was $1,091.0 million as of September 30, 2008, compared to $1,170.7 million as
of December 31, 2007.
In November 2007, we entered into an $800 million five-year senior credit facility (the
Facility) with a syndication of lenders. The Facility consists of a $400 million secured letter
of credit facility for the issuance of standby letters of credit (the Secured Facility) and a
$400 million unsecured facility for the making of revolving loans and for the issuance of standby
letters of credit (the Unsecured Facility). Both the Secured Facility and the Unsecured Facility
have options to increase the aggregate commitments by up to $200 million, subject to approval of
the lenders. The Facility will be used for general corporate purposes and to issue standby letters
of credit. The Facility contains representations, warranties and covenants customary for similar
bank loan facilities, including a covenant to maintain a ratio of consolidated indebtedness to
total capitalization as of the last day of each fiscal quarter or fiscal year of not greater than
0.35 to 1.0 and a covenant under the Unsecured Facility to maintain a certain consolidated net
worth. In addition, each material insurance subsidiary must maintain a financial strength rating
from A.M. Best Company of at least A- under the Unsecured Facility and of at least B++ under the
Secured Facility. Concurrent with this new Facility, we terminated the Letter of Credit Facility
with Barclays Bank PLC and all outstanding letters of credit issued thereunder were transferred to
the Secured Facility. We were in compliance with all covenants under the Facility as of September
30, 2008.
-55-
There are a total of 13 lenders who make up the Facility syndication and have varying
commitments ranging from $20.0 million
to $87.5 million. Of the 13 lenders, four have commitments of $87.5 million each, four have
commitments of $62.5 million each, four have commitments of $45.0 million each and one has a
commitment of $20.0 million. One of the lenders in the Facility with a $20.0 million commitment
has declared bankruptcy under Chapter 11 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code. We do not expect this lender
to be able to meet its commitment under the Facility.
Security arrangements with ceding insurers may subject our assets to security interests or
require that a portion of our assets be pledged to, or otherwise held by, third parties. Both of
our letter of credit facilities are fully collateralized by assets held in custodial accounts at
the Bank of New York Mellon held for the benefit of the banks. Although the investment income
derived from our assets while held in trust accrues to our benefit, the investment of these assets
is governed by the terms of the letter of credit facilities or the investment regulations of the
state or territory of domicile of the ceding insurer, which may be more restrictive than the
investment regulations applicable to us under Bermuda law. The restrictions may result in lower
investment yields on these assets, which may adversely affect our profitability.
We participate in a securities lending program whereby the securities we own that are included
in fixed maturity investments available for sale are loaned to third parties, primarily brokerage
firms, for a short period of time through a lending agent. We maintain control over the securities
we lend and can recall them at any time for any reason. We receive amounts equal to all interest
and dividends associated with the loaned securities and receive a fee from the borrower for the
temporary use of the securities. Collateral in the form of cash is required initially at a minimum
rate of 102% of the market value of the loaned securities and may not decrease below 100% of the
market value of the loaned securities before additional collateral is required. We had
$48.6 million and $144.6 million in securities on loan as of September 30, 2008 and December 31,
2007, respectively, with collateral held against such loaned securities amounting to $48.8 million
and $147.2 million, respectively.
We do not currently anticipate that the restrictions on liquidity resulting from restrictions
on the payments of dividends by our subsidiary companies or from assets committed in trust accounts
or to collateralize the letter of credit facilities or by our securities lending program will have
a material impact on our ability to carry out our normal business activities, including interest
and dividend payments, respectively, on our senior notes and common shares.
Despite the recent turmoil in the financial and credit markets, we believe our companys
capital position continues to remain well within the range needed for our business requirements and
we have sufficient liquidity to fund our ongoing operations.
Sources and Uses of Funds
Our sources of funds primarily consist of premium receipts net of commissions, investment
income, net proceeds from capital raising activities that may include the issuance of common
shares, senior notes and other debt or equity issuances, and proceeds from sales and redemption of
investments. Cash is used primarily to pay losses and loss expenses, purchase reinsurance, pay
general and administrative expenses and taxes, and pay dividends and interest, with the remainder
made available to our investment portfolio managers for investment in accordance with our investment policy.
On December 31, 2007, we filed a shelf-registration statement on Form S-3 (No. 333-148409)
with the SEC in which we may offer from time to time common shares, preference shares, depository
shares representing common shares or preference shares, senior or subordinated debt securities,
warrants to purchase common shares, preference shares and debt securities, share purchase
contracts, share purchase units and units which may consist of any combination of the securities
listed above. The proceeds from any issuance may be used for working capital, capital expenditures,
acquisitions and other general corporate purposes. To the extent additional capital is necessary,
the current conditions in the financial markets may prevent us from raising capital or from raising
capital at reasonable prices.
Cash flows from operations for the nine months ended September 30, 2008 were $509.9 million
compared to $618.8 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2007. The decrease in cash
flows from operations was primarily due to lower net premiums written.
Cash flows from investing activities consist primarily of proceeds on the sale of investments
and payments for investments acquired. We had cash flows provided by investing activities of
$154.6 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2008 compared to cash flows used in
investing activities of $1,120.6 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2007. The
increase in investing cash flows was due to higher proceeds on the sale of fixed maturity
securities caused by selling securities to fund the payment of our acquisition of Darwin. The
transaction to acquire Darwin was completed in October 2008 and the total amount paid was $550.1
million, excluding direct costs of the acquisition. Also included in the cash flows used in
investing activities was the net
-56-
cash paid for Finial Insurance Company of $44.1 million. Please refer to Note 4 of our
unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements regarding our acquisition of Finial Insurance
Company.
Cash flows used in financing activities consist primarily of the payment of dividends and any
capital raising activities, which would include the issuance of common shares or debt. During the
nine months ended September 30, 2008 we paid dividends of $26.4 million compared to $27.2 million
during the nine months ended September 30, 2007.
On November 6, 2008, our board of directors declared a quarterly dividend of $0.18 per share,
or approximately $8.8 million in aggregate, payable on December 11, 2008 to the shareholders of
record as of November 25, 2008. We expect our operating cash flows, together with our existing
capital base, to be sufficient to meet these requirements and to operate our business. Our funds
are primarily invested in liquid, high-grade fixed income securities. As of September 30, 2008 and
December 31, 2007, including a global high-yield bond fund, 99% of our fixed income portfolio
consisted of investment grade securities. As of September 30, 2008, net accumulated unrealized
losses, net of income taxes, were $19.8 million and as of December 31, 2007, net accumulated
unrealized gains, net of income taxes, were $136.2 million. The change in unrealized gains or
losses during 2008 reflected movements in interest rates and credit spread widening partially
offset by the recognition of approximately $112.3 million of realized losses on securities that
were considered to be impaired on an other-than-temporary basis. The maturity distribution of our
fixed income portfolio (on a market value basis) as of September 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007 was
as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
($ in millions) |
|
Due in one year or less |
|
$ |
310.7 |
|
|
$ |
474.1 |
|
Due after one year through five years. |
|
|
1,474.4 |
|
|
|
1,982.1 |
|
Due after five years through ten years |
|
|
1,087.9 |
|
|
|
869.0 |
|
Due after ten years |
|
|
383.6 |
|
|
|
99.5 |
|
Mortgage-backed |
|
|
2,069.1 |
|
|
|
2,117.5 |
|
Asset-backed |
|
|
107.6 |
|
|
|
164.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
5,433.3 |
|
|
$ |
5,707.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We have investments in various hedge funds, the market value of which was $167.7 million as of
September 30, 2008. Each of the hedge funds has redemption notice requirements. For those hedge
funds that are in the form of limited partnerships, liquidity is allowed after the term of the
partnership and could be extended at the option of the general partner. As of September 30, 2008,
we had two hedge funds that were in the form of limited partnerships, which allow for liquidity in
2010 unless extended by the general partners. Our other hedge funds typically allow liquidity an
average of three months after we give notice of redemption. During September 2008, we submitted
redemption requests for our investments in the Goldman Sachs Multi-Strategy VI, Ltd fund (the
Portfolio VI Fund) and AIG Select Hedge Ltd. fund (the AIG Select Fund). We are the sole
investors in the Portfolio VI Fund and the market value of this fund was $65.5 million as of
September 30, 2008. The market value of the AIG Select Fund was $62.6 million as of September 30,
2008. Given current market conditions, we may not realize the full value of these investments at
final redemption.
We do not believe that inflation has had a material effect on our consolidated results of
operations. The potential exists, after a catastrophe loss, for the development of inflationary
pressures in a local economy. The effects of inflation are considered implicitly in pricing. Loss
reserves are established to recognize likely loss settlements at the date payment is made. Those
reserves inherently recognize the effects of inflation. The actual effects of inflation on our
results cannot be accurately known, however, until claims are ultimately resolved.
Financial Strength Ratings
Financial strength ratings and senior unsecured debt ratings represent the opinions of rating
agencies on our capacity to meet our obligations. Some of our reinsurance treaties contain special
funding and termination clauses that are triggered in the event that we or one of our subsidiaries
is downgraded by one of the major rating agencies to levels specified in the treaties, or our
capital is significantly reduced. If such an event were to happen, we would be required, in
certain instances, to post collateral in the form of letters of credit and/or trust accounts
against existing outstanding losses, if any, related to the treaty. In a limited number of
instances, the subject treaties could be cancelled retroactively or commuted by the cedent and
might affect our ability to write business.
The following were our financial strength ratings as of November 3, 2008:
-57-
|
|
|
A.M. Best
|
|
A/stable |
Moodys*
|
|
A2/negative |
Standard & Poors**
|
|
A-/stable |
|
|
|
* |
|
Moodys financial strength ratings are for the companys Bermuda and U.S. insurance and
reinsurance subsidiaries, other than those U.S. subsidiaries the company acquired from
Darwin. |
|
** |
|
The U.S. subsidiaries the company acquired from Darwin are not rated by Standard & Poors. |
The following were our senior unsecured debt ratings as of November 3, 2008:
|
|
|
A.M. Best
|
|
bbb/stable |
Moodys
|
|
Baa1/negative |
Standard & Poors
|
|
BBB/stable |
Long-Term Debt
On July 21, 2006, we issued $500.0 million aggregate principal amount of 7.50% senior notes
due August 1, 2016, with interest payable August 1 and February 1 each year, commencing February 1,
2007. We can redeem the senior notes prior to maturity, subject to payment of a make-whole
premium, however, we currently have no intention of redeeming the notes. The senior notes include
certain covenants that include:
|
|
|
Limitation on liens on stock of designated subsidiaries; |
|
|
|
|
Limitation as to the disposition of stock of designated subsidiaries; and |
|
|
|
|
Limitations on mergers, amalgamations, consolidations or sale of assets. |
We were in compliance with all covenants related to our senior notes as of September 30, 2008.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
As of September 30, 2008, we did not have any off-balance sheet arrangements.
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.
We believe that we are principally exposed to three types of market risk: interest rate risk,
credit risk and currency risk.
The fixed income securities in our investment portfolio are subject to interest rate risk.
Any change in interest rates has a direct effect on the market values of fixed income securities.
As interest rates rise, the market values fall, and vice versa. The change in market value is
determined by calculating hypothetical September 30, 2008 ending prices based on yields adjusted to
reflect the hypothetical changes in interest rates, comparing such hypothetical ending prices to
actual ending prices, and multiplying the difference by the principal amount of the security. The
sensitivity analysis is based on estimates. The estimated changes of our fixed maturity investments
and cash and cash equivalents presented below and actual changes for interest rate shifts could
differ significantly.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest Rate Shift in Basis Points |
|
|
-200 |
|
-100 |
|
-50 |
|
0 |
|
+50 |
|
+100 |
|
+200 |
|
|
($ in millions) |
Total market value |
|
$ |
6,642.7 |
|
|
$ |
6,432.2 |
|
|
$ |
6,328.3 |
|
|
$ |
6,225.2 |
|
|
$ |
6,123.0 |
|
|
$ |
6,021.7 |
|
|
$ |
5,821.7 |
|
Market value change from base |
|
|
417.5 |
|
|
|
207.0 |
|
|
|
103.1 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
(102.2 |
) |
|
|
(203.5 |
) |
|
|
(403.5 |
) |
Change in unrealized appreciation/(depreciation) |
|
|
6.7 |
% |
|
|
3.3 |
% |
|
|
1.7 |
% |
|
|
0.0 |
% |
|
|
(1.6 |
)% |
|
|
(3.3 |
)% |
|
|
(6.5 |
)% |
As a holder of fixed income securities, we also have exposure to credit risk. In an effort to
minimize this risk, our investment guidelines have been defined to ensure that the assets held are
well diversified and are primarily high-quality securities. As of
-58-
September 30, 2008, approximately 99% of our fixed income investments (which includes
individually held securities and securities held in a global high-yield bond fund) consisted of
investment grade securities. As of September 30, 2008, we held $910.7 million, or 14.1%, of our
aggregate invested assets in corporate bonds that were issued by entities within the financial
services industry. These corporate bonds had an average credit rating of AA-.
As of September 30, 2008, we held $2,069.1 million, or 32.0%, of our aggregate invested assets
in mortgage-backed securities, which included agency pass-through mortgage backed securities,
non-agency mortgage-backed securities and commercial mortgage-backed securities. The agency
pass-through mortgage backed securities, non-agency mortgage-backed securities and commercial
mortgage-backed securities represented 19.8%, 4.2% and 8.0%, respectively, of our aggregate
invested assets. These assets are exposed to prepayment risk, which occurs when holders of
individual mortgages increase the frequency with which they prepay the outstanding principal before
the maturity date to refinance at a lower interest rate cost. Given the proportion that these
securities comprise of the overall portfolio, and the current interest rate environment, prepayment
risk is not considered significant at this time. In addition, nearly all of our investments in
mortgage-backed securities were rated Aaa by Moodys and AAA by Standard & Poors as of
September 30, 2008. As of September 30, 2008, our mortgage-backed securities that have exposure to
subprime mortgages was limited to $2.3 million, or 0.04%, of our fixed maturity investments.
As of September 30, 2008, we held investments in four hedge funds with a market value of
$167.7 million. Investments in hedge funds involve certain risks related to, among other things,
the illiquid nature of the fund shares, the limited operating history of the fund, as well as risks
associated with the strategies employed by the managers of the funds.
Given the
current turmoil in the financial markets, we believe that there is potential for
significant write-downs of our, and other insurers, invested assets in future periods if the current
economic environment were to persist for an extended period of time.
The U.S. dollar is our reporting currency and the functional currency of all of our operating
subsidiaries. We enter into insurance and reinsurance contracts where the premiums receivable and
losses payable are denominated in currencies other than the U.S. dollar. In addition, we maintain
a portion of our investments and liabilities in currencies other than the U.S. dollar, primarily
Euro, British Sterling and the Canadian dollar. Assets in non-U.S. currencies are generally
converted into U.S. dollars at the time of receipt. When we incur a liability in a
non-U.S. currency, we carry such liability on our books in the original currency. These
liabilities are converted from the non-U.S. currency to U.S. dollars at the time of payment. As a
result, we have an exposure to foreign currency risk resulting from fluctuations in exchange rates.
As of September 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007, 2.3% of our aggregate invested assets were
denominated in currencies other than the U.S. dollar. Of our business written in the nine months
ended September 30, 2008 and 2007, approximately 16% and 14% was written in currencies other than
the U.S. dollar, respectively. Of our business written in the year ended December 31, 2007,
approximately 14% was written in currencies other than the U.S. dollar. We utilize a hedging
strategy whose objective is to minimize the potential loss of value caused by currency fluctuations
by using foreign currency forward contract derivatives that expire in 90 days.
Our foreign exchange gain for the nine months ended September 30, 2008 and 2007 and the year
ended December 31, 2007 are set forth in the chart below.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months |
|
|
Year |
|
|
|
Ended |
|
|
Ended |
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
December 31 |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
($ in millions) |
|
Realized exchange (loss) gain |
|
$ |
(1.9 |
) |
|
$ |
0.6 |
|
|
$ |
1.6 |
|
Unrealized exchange gain (loss) |
|
|
4.6 |
|
|
|
(0.2 |
) |
|
|
(0.8 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign exchange gain |
|
$ |
2.7 |
|
|
$ |
0.4 |
|
|
$ |
0.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Item 4. Controls and Procedures.
In connection with the preparation of this quarterly report, our management has performed an
evaluation, with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of
the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
-59-
Rule 13a-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the Exchange Act)) as of September
30, 2008. Disclosure controls and procedures are designed to ensure that information required to
be disclosed in reports filed or submitted under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed,
summarized and reported within the time periods specified by SEC rules and forms and that such
information is accumulated and communicated to management, including our Chief Executive Officer
and Chief Financial Officer, to allow for timely decisions regarding required disclosures. Based
on their evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that, as of
September 30, 2008, our companys disclosure controls and procedures were effective to ensure that
information required to be disclosed in our reports filed under the Exchange Act is recorded,
processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified by SEC rules and forms and
accumulated and communicated to management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief
Financial Officer, as appropriate to allow for timely decisions regarding required disclosures.
Our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, does not
expect that our disclosure controls and procedures or our internal control over financial reporting
will prevent all error and all fraud. A control system, no matter how well conceived and operated,
can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the objectives of the control system are
met. Further, the design of a control system must reflect the fact that there are resource
constraints, and the benefits of controls must be considered relative to their costs. Because of
the inherent limitations in all control systems, no evaluation of controls can provide an absolute
assurance that all control issues and instances of fraud, if any, within our company have been
detected.
No changes were made in our internal controls over financial reporting, as such term is
defined in Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(f), during the quarter ended September 30, 2008 that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over
financial reporting.
PART II
OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. Legal Proceedings.
We are and in the future may become involved in various claims and legal proceedings that
arise in the normal course of our business. While any claim or legal proceeding contains an element
of uncertainty, we do not currently believe that any claim or legal proceeding to which we are
presently a party to is likely to have a material adverse effect on our results of operations.
Item 1A. Risk Factors.
Our business is subject to a number of risks, including those identified in Item 1A of Part I
of our 2007 Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC, that could have a material effect on our
business, results of operations, financial condition and/or liquidity and that could cause our
operating results to vary significantly from period to period. The risks described in our Annual
Report on Form 10-K are not the only risks we face. Additional risks and uncertainties not
currently known to us or that we currently deem to be immaterial also could have a material effect
on our business, results of operations, financial condition and/or liquidity.
On October 20, 2008, we completed the acquisition of Darwin, and Darwin is now an indirect
wholly-owned subsidiary of ours. As with any acquisition, there are risks for the combined entity
going forward, including those risks set forth in the risk factor below.
The anticipated benefits of the Darwin acquisition may not be realized fully or at all or may take
longer to realize than expected.
The acquisition involves the integration of two companies that have previously operated
independently. The two companies have and will continue to devote significant management attention
and resources to integrating the two companies. Delays in this process could adversely affect our
business, results of operations, financial condition and share price. Achieving the anticipated
benefits of the acquisition is subject to a number of uncertainties, including whether Darwins and
our businesses are integrated in an efficient and effective manner, and general competitive factors
in the marketplace. We may experience unanticipated difficulties or expenses in connection with
integrating these businesses, including:
|
|
|
retaining existing employees, clients, brokers, agents and program administrators of
Darwin, |
|
|
|
|
retaining and integrating management and other key employees of Darwin and |
|
|
|
|
potential charges to earnings resulting from the application of purchase accounting to
the transaction. |
-60-
Even if the business operations are integrated successfully, there can be no assurance that we
will realize the full benefits of synergies, cost savings and operating efficiencies that we
currently expect from this integration or that these benefits will be achieved within the
anticipated time frame. Failure to achieve these anticipated benefits could result in increased
costs, decreases in the amount of expected revenues and diversion of managements time and energy
and could materially adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Item 2. Unregistered Sale of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds.
None.
Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities.
None.
Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders.
None.
Item 5. Other Information.
None.
Item 6. Exhibits.
|
|
|
Exhibit |
|
|
Number |
|
Description |
10.1(1) |
|
Form of Indemnification Agreement. |
|
|
|
31.1
|
|
Certification by Chief Executive Officer, as required by Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
31.2
|
|
Certification by Chief Financial Officer, as required by Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
32.1*
|
|
Certification by Chief Executive Officer, as required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
32.2*
|
|
Certification by Chief Financial Officer, as required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Incorporated by reference to the Current Report on Form 8-K of Allied World Assurance Company
Holdings, Ltd, filed with the SEC on August 7, 2006. Other than with respect to matters such
as his name and address, the indemnification agreement for Mr. Patrick de Saint-Aignan is
identical to the form filed as Exhibit 10.1. |
|
* |
|
These certifications are being furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18 United States
Code) and are not being filed as part of this report. |
-61-
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly
caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ALLIED WORLD ASSURANCE COMPANY HOLDINGS, LTD |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dated:
November 7, 2008
|
|
By:
Name:
|
|
/s/ Scott A. Carmilani
Scott A. Carmilani
|
|
|
|
|
Title:
|
|
President and Chief Executive Officer |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dated:
November 7, 2008
|
|
By:
Name:
|
|
/s/ Joan H. Dillard
Joan H. Dillard
|
|
|
|
|
Title:
|
|
Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |
|
|
-62-
EXHIBIT INDEX
|
|
|
Exhibit |
|
|
Number |
|
Description |
10.1(1) |
|
Form of Indemnification Agreement. |
|
|
|
31.1
|
|
Certification by Chief Executive Officer, as required by Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
31.2
|
|
Certification by Chief Financial Officer, as required by Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
32.1*
|
|
Certification by Chief Executive Officer, as required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
32.2*
|
|
Certification by Chief Financial Officer, as required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Incorporated by reference to the Current Report on Form 8-K of Allied World Assurance Company
Holdings, Ltd, filed with the SEC on August 7, 2006. Other than with respect to matters such
as his name and address, the indemnification agreement for Mr. Patrick de Saint-Aignan is
identical to the form filed as Exhibit 10.1. |
|
* |
|
These certifications are being furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18 United States
Code) and are not being filed as part of this report. |
-63-