num.htm

UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM N-CSR

CERTIFIED SHAREHOLDER REPORT OF
REGISTERED MANAGEMENT INVESTMENT COMPANIES

Investment Company Act file number 811-06383

Nuveen Michigan Quality Income Municipal Fund
(Exact name of registrant as specified in charter)

Nuveen Investments
333 West Wacker Drive
Chicago, IL 60606
(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip code)

Kevin J. McCarthy
Nuveen Investments
333 West Wacker Drive
Chicago, IL 60606
(Name and address of agent for service)

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (312) 917-7700

Date of fiscal year end: February 28

Date of reporting period: February 28, 2015

Form N-CSR is to be used by management investment companies to file reports with the Commission not later than 10 days after the transmission to stockholders of any report that is required to be transmitted to stockholders under Rule 30e-1 under the Investment Company Act of 1940 (17 CFR 270.30e-1). The Commission may use the information provided on Form N-CSR in its regulatory, disclosure review, inspection, and policymaking roles.

A registrant is required to disclose the information specified by Form N-CSR, and the Commission will make this information public. A registrant is not required to respond to the collection of information contained in Form N-CSR unless the Form displays a currently valid Office of Management and Budget (“OMB”) control number. Please direct comments concerning the accuracy of the information collection burden estimate and any suggestions for reducing the burden to Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 450 Fifth Street, NW, Washington, DC 20549-0609. The OMB has reviewed this collection of information under the clearance requirements of 44 U.S.C. ss. 3507.


 
 

 


ITEM 1. REPORTS TO STOCKHOLDERS.


 
 

 
 
Life is Complex
 
Nuveen makes things e-simple.
 
It only takes a minute to sign up for e-Reports. Once enrolled, you’ll receive an e-mail as soon as your Nuveen Investments Fund information is ready—no more waiting for delivery by regular mail. Just click on the link within the e-mail to see the report and save it on your computer if you wish.
 
Free e-Reports right to your e-mail!
 
www.investordelivery.com
If you receive your Nuveen Fund dividends and statements from your financial advisor or brokerage account.
 
or
 
www.nuveen.com/accountaccess
If you receive your Nuveen Fund dividends and statements directly from Nuveen.
 

 
 

 
 
Table of Contents
 
Chairman’s Letter to Shareholders
4
   
Portfolio Managers’ Comments
5
   
Fund Leverage
12
   
Common Share Information
13
   
Risk Considerations
15
   
Performance Overview and Holding Summaries
16
   
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
24
   
Portfolios of Investments
25
   
Statement of Assets and Liabilities
57
   
Statement of Operations
58
   
Statement of Changes in Net Assets
59
   
Statement of Cash Flows
61
   
Financial Highlights
62
   
Notes to Financial Statements
68
   
Additional Fund Information
83
   
Glossary of Terms Used in this Report
84
   
Reinvest Automatically, Easily and Conveniently
86
   
Board Members & Officers
87
 
Nuveen Investments
 
3

 
 

 
 
Chairman’s Letter to Shareholders
 
 
Dear Shareholders,
 
A pattern of divergence has emerged in the past year. Steady and moderate growth in the U.S. economy helped sustain the stock market’s bull run another year. U.S. bonds also performed well, amid subdued inflation, interest rates that remained unexpectedly low and concerns about the economic well-being of the rest of the world. The stronger domestic economy enabled the U.S. Federal Reserve (Fed) to gradually reduce its large scale bond purchases, known as quantitative easing (QE), without disruption to the markets, as well as begin to set expectations for a transition into tightening mode.
 
The economic story outside the U.S. continues to improve. Despite the drama over Greece’s debt negotiations, the European economy appears to be stabilizing. Japan is on a moderate recovery path as it emerged from recession late last quarter. China’s economy decelerated and, despite running well above the rate of other major global economies, investors feared it looked slow by China’s standards. Some areas of concern were a surprisingly steep decline in oil prices, the U.S. dollar’s rally and an increase in geopolitical tensions, including the Russia-Ukraine crisis and terrorist attacks across the Middle East and Africa, as well as more recently in Europe.
 
While a backdrop of healthy economic growth in the U.S. and the continuation of accommodative monetary policy (with the central banks of Japan and potentially Europe stepping in where the Fed has left off) bodes well for the markets, the global outlook has become more uncertain. Indeed, volatility is likely to feature more prominently in the investment landscape going forward. Such conditions underscore the importance of professional investment management. Experienced investment teams have weathered the market’s ups and downs in the past and emerged with a better understanding of the sensitivities of their asset class and investment style, particularly in times of turbulence. We recognize the importance of maximizing gains, while striving to minimize volatility.
 
And, the same is true for investors like you. Maintaining an appropriate time horizon, diversification and relying on practiced investment teams are among your best strategies for achieving your long-term investment objectives. Additionally, I encourage you to communicate with your financial consultant if you have questions about your investment in a Nuveen Fund. On behalf of the other members of the Nuveen Fund Board, we look forward to continuing to earn your trust in the months and years ahead.
 
 
William J. Schneider
Chairman of the Board
April 22, 2015
 
4
 
Nuveen Investments

 
 

 
 
Portfolio Managers’ Comments
 
Nuveen Arizona Premium Income Municipal Fund (NAZ)
Nuveen Michigan Quality Income Municipal Fund (NUM)
Nuveen Ohio Quality Income Municipal Fund (NUO)
Nuveen Texas Quality Income Municipal Fund (NTX)
 
These Funds feature portfolio management by Nuveen Asset Management, LLC, an affiliate of Nuveen Investments, Inc. Portfolio managers Michael S. Hamilton and Daniel J. Close, CFA, review U.S. economic and municipal market conditions at the national and state levels, key investment strategies and the twelve-month reporting period performance of these four Nuveen Funds. Michael assumed portfolio management responsibility for NAZ in 2011, while Dan has managed NUM, NUO and NTX since 2007.
 
What factors affected the U.S. economy and the national municipal bond market during the twelve-month reporting period ended February 28, 2015?
 
During this reporting period, the U.S. economy continued to expand at a moderate pace. The Federal Reserve (Fed) maintained efforts to bolster growth and promote progress toward its mandates of maximum employment and price stability by holding the benchmark fed funds rate at the record low level of zero to 0.25% that it established in December 2008. At its October 2014 meeting, the Fed announced that it would end its bond-buying stimulus program as of November 1, 2014, after tapering its monthly asset purchases of mortgage-backed and longer-term Treasury securities from the original $85 billion per month to $15 billion per month over the course of seven consecutive meetings (December 2013 through September 2014). In making the announcement, the Fed cited substantial improvement in the outlook for the labor market since the inception of the current asset purchase program as well as sufficient underlying strength in the broader economy to support ongoing progress toward maximum employment in a context of price stability. The Fed also reiterated that it would continue to look at a wide range of factors, including labor market conditions, indicators of inflationary pressures and readings on financial developments, in determining future actions. Additionally, the Fed stated that it would likely maintain the current target range for the fed funds rate for a considerable time after the end of the asset purchase program, especially if projected inflation continues to run below the Fed’s 2% longer run goal. However, if economic data shows faster progress, the Fed indicated it could raise the fed funds rate sooner than expected.
 
The Fed changed its language slightly in December, indicating it would be “patient” in normalizing monetary policy. This shift helped ease investors’ worries that the Fed might raise rates too soon. As the reporting period drew to a close, expectations were that the Fed would drop the word patient from its March post-meeting statement, in an effort to telegraph that a rate hike was likely
 
Certain statements in this report are forward-looking statements. Discussions of specific investments are for illustration only and are not intended as recommendations of individual investments. The forward-looking statements and other views expressed herein are those of the portfolio managers as of the date of this report. Actual future results or occurrences may differ significantly from those anticipated in any forward-looking statements, and the views expressed herein are subject to change at any time, due to numerous market and other factors. The Funds disclaim any obligation to update publicly or revise any forward-looking statements or views expressed herein.
 
Ratings shown are the highest rating given by one of the following national rating agencies: Standard & Poor’s (S&P), Moody’s Investors Service, Inc. (Moody’s) or Fitch, Inc. (Fitch). Credit ratings are subject to change. AAA, AA, A and BBB are investment grade ratings; BB, B, CCC, CC, C and D are below investment grade ratings. Certain bonds backed by U.S. Government or agency securities are regarded as having an implied rating equal to the rating of such securities. Holdings designated N/R are not rated by these national rating agencies.
 
Bond insurance guarantees only the payment of principal and interest on the bond when due, and not the value of the bonds themselves, which will fluctuate with the bond market and the financial success of the issuer and the insurer. Insurance relates specifically to the bonds in the portfolio and not to the share prices of a Fund. No representation is made as to the insurers’ ability to meet their commitments.
 
Refer to the Glossary of Terms Used in this Report for further definition of the terms used within this section.
 
 Nuveen Investments
 
5

 
 

 
 
Portfolio Managers’ Comments (continued)
 
in June. The March statement (issued after the close of this reporting period) did indeed remove the word patient but also highlighted the Fed’s less optimistic view of the economy’s overall health as well as downgraded its inflation projections.
 
In the fourth quarter of 2014, the U.S. economy, as measured by the U.S. gross domestic product (GDP), grew at a 2.2% annual rate, compared with 4.6% in the second quarter and 5.0% in the third quarter of 2014. The decline in real GDP growth rate from the third quarter to the fourth quarter primarily reflects an upturn in imports, a downturn in federal government spending, and decline in exports. These were partly offset by an upturn in consumer spending. The Consumer Price Index (CPI) fell 0.1% year-over-year as of January 2015 (most recent data available at the time this report was prepared), the first negative twelve-month change since October 2009. The core CPI (which excludes food and energy) increased 1.6% during the same period, below the Fed’s unofficial longer term inflation objective of 2.0%. As of February 28, 2015, the national unemployment rate was 5.5%, the lowest level since May 2008 and the level considered “full employment” by some Fed officials, down from the 6.7% reported in February 2014. The housing market continued to post gains, although price growth has shown signs of deceleration in recent months. The average home price in the S&P/Case-Shiller Index of 20 major metropolitan areas rose 4.6% for the twelve months ended January 2015 (most recent data available at the time this report was prepared).
 
Municipal bonds enjoyed strong performance during the twelve-month reporting period, buoyed by a backdrop of low interest rates, improving investor sentiment and favorable supply-demand dynamics. Interest rates were widely expected to rise in 2014, as the economy improved and the Fed wound down its asset purchases. However, the 10-year Treasury yield ended the year even lower than where it began. As a result, fixed income asset classes performed surprisingly well (as yields fall, prices rise and vice versa). At the same time, investors grew more confident that the Fed’s tapering would proceed at a measured pace and that the credit woes of Detroit and Puerto Rico would be contained. In addition, credit fundamentals for state and local governments were generally stabilizing, although pockets of trouble remained. California and New York showed marked improvements during 2014, whereas Illinois, New Jersey and Puerto Rico, for example, still face considerable challenges.
 
Investors’ declining risk aversion bolstered demand for higher-yielding assets, including municipal bonds, which reversed the tide of outflows municipal bond funds suffered in 2013. While demand and inflows rose, supply continued to be subdued. More municipal bonds left the market than were added in 2014, a condition known as net negative issuance. Part of the reason for net negative issuance was that a significant portion of issuer activity focused on current refundings, in which a new bond is issued to replace the called bond (in contrast to an advanced refunding, where the called bond remains in the market as a pre-refunded bond).
 
These factors helped drive municipal bond yields lower and tightened yield spreads relative to Treasuries in 2014 overall. However, as the new year began, market conditions turned more volatile. A series of disappointing economic data underscored the fragility of the U.S. recovery, as well as cast further uncertainty on the timing of the Fed’s first rate hike. A change in the supply-demand balance also hampered the municipal bond sector. Issuance was unusually strong in the first two months of 2015, up 72.5% compared to the same two-month period in 2014. Over the twelve months ended February 28, 2015, municipal bond issuance nationwide totaled $358.8 billion, an increase of 13% from the issuance for the twelve-month period ended February 28, 2014. Finally, divergence in economic growth and foreign central bank policies have reinforced an interest rate differential that favors demand for U.S. Treasuries, maintaining downward pressure on yields.
 
How were the economic and market environments in Arizona, Michigan, Ohio and Texas during the twelve-month reporting period ended February 28, 2015?
 
Arizona’s economic recovery has surpassed the nations after experiencing a severe housing market decline. Growth in hospitality and health care has led recent improvements in the state’s employment picture. The recovery in the housing market has slowed from last year’s pace but remains a moderate driver. However, in the long term, Arizona is expected to outperform because of its strong population growth and investment in biotech, medical devices and health care. Additionally, its low business costs relative to neighboring Southern California make Arizona more attractive for new business ventures. Gains in Arizona housing prices have
 
6
 
Nuveen Investments

 
 

 
 
been driven primarily by the Phoenix market, with the state’s smaller metropolitan areas also showing progress. According to the S&P/Case-Shiller Index, housing prices in Phoenix rose 2.6% over the twelve months ended January 2015 (most recent data available at the time this report was prepared), compared with the 20 City Composite Home Price Index increase of 4.6% nationally. In the job market, the Arizona unemployment rate dropped to a preliminary 6.5% as of February 2015, the lowest level since June 2008, down from 7.1% in February 2014. The 2015 General Fund Budget was enacted in April, totaling $9.2 billion, up 4.2% over the 2014 Enacted Budget and includes increased spending for child safety and education and protects the rainy day fund. The state joint legislative budget committee projects a structural deficit in Fiscal Year 2015, which the state plans to fill with the use of rainy day funds. At the end of Fiscal 2013, the state’s temporary one-cent sales tax, enacted in 2011, expired, resulting in budget gaps for Fiscal 2014 and Fiscal 2015. Arizona used the accumulated financial cushion generated by the sales taxes to offset these shortfalls. The newly sworn in Republican Governor, Doug Ducey, signed the 2016 General Fund Budget in March 2015 (subsequent to the close of this reporting period), totaling $9.1 billion. Once enacted it fills the Fiscal Year 2015 shortfall and a projected budget deficit for Fiscal Year 2016 through expenditure reductions, reallocation of monies from certain separate agency funds to the State’s general fund and drawing down the rainy day fund without raising taxes. The State reports it will face budgetary shortfall for Fiscal Year 2017 before becoming in balance by Fiscal Year 2018. The Arizona Supreme Court Ruled that the state did not provide inflation adjustments in school funding during Fiscal Years 2010-2013 as required under voter approved Proposition 301. It is yet unknown whether the ruling will result in a retroactive repayment of prior years’ missed payments estimated to total $1.2 billion or apply only to future years’ budgets, as the case is still being litigated. In November 2013, Moody’s affirmed Arizona’s issuer rating at Aa3 and changed its outlook for the state to positive from stable. S&P affirmed the State of Arizona’s issuer credit at AA- but revised its outlook to positive from stable on November 27, 2013. During the twelve months ended February 28, 2015, municipal issuance in Arizona totaled $6.9 billion, an increase of 84% from the twelve months ended February 28, 2014. This issuance may be attributed to a dramatic increase in refunding activity.
 
Michigan’s economic recovery has strengthened over the last year and though job growth overall is still behind the U.S., auto manufacturing and health care hiring are projected to remain strong through 2015. Strong domestic auto sales have incrementally bolstered growth over the past five years and an uptick in the sales of light-trucks is expected to directly benefit hiring in southeastern Michigan this year. To a large extent, the Michigan economy remained tied to events in the auto industry, as the “Big Three” (General Motors, Ford and Chrysler) continued to rank among the state’s five largest employers. Overall, Michigan remained heavily reliant on manufacturing, which represented 13.5% of employment in the state, compared with 8.8% nationally. As of February 2015, Michigan’s unemployment rate was 5.9%, down from 7.8% in January 2014, and the lowest level since April 2008. Favorably, the state’s labor force participation rate has remained stable as unemployment has improved, indicating a real improvement in job growth. Following the peak in housing prices in mid-2006, home prices in Michigan declined dramatically and the inventory of foreclosed homes remained elevated in many of the state’s hardest-hit metropolitan areas, including Detroit, Warren and Flint. Improvement in the state economy has brought some recuperation in the housing market. After steep gains over 2013, housing price appreciation saw continued, but slower growth. According to the S&P/Case-Shiller Index of 20 major metropolitan areas, housing prices in Detroit rose 2.9% over the twelve months ended January 2015 (most recent data available at the time this report was prepared), compared with the national average increase of 4.6%. On the fiscal front, Michigan’s budgetary performance over the last two years has been impressive. As revenues improved, the state demonstrated a commitment to rebuild reserves. For Fiscal 2014, Michigan’s $49 billion budget was structurally balanced and did not require major expenditure cuts or borrowing. Although the state appropriated $75 million to the state’s reserve fund in Fiscal 2014, $194.8 million was withdrawn to fund the state’s contribution to the Detroit bankruptcy settlement. At year end the reserve fund balance stood at $386.2 million. Beginning in 2015 this withdrawal will be repaid with annual deposits from tobacco settlement revenues and the Fiscal 2015 budget provides for a $94 million contribution. By Fiscal Year end 2015, the reserve balance is projected to be nearly $500 million. The state’s improved financial and cash position has eliminated the need for cash flow borrowing. A modest $336 million budget gap due to revenue shortfalls is now projected for Fiscal Year 2015. This gap is expected to be closed by shifting school aid revenues and cutting about $100 million in expenditures. The governor’s proposed $54 billion budget for Fiscal 2016 represents a
 
 Nuveen Investments
 
7

 
 

 
 
Portfolio Managers’ Comments (continued)
 
2% spending increase. In May 2015 Michigan voters will be asked to approve a sales tax increase to generate up to $1.2 billion in new annual revenues to help fund state infrastructure and transportation needs. The governor has also proposed making a $95 million contribution to the state’s reserve fund in Fiscal 2016. The budget is expected to be adopted by the end of June. As of March 2015, Moody’s and S&P rated Michigan general obligation (GO) debt at Aa2 and AA-, respectively. Both agencies revised their outlook for the state to positive in 2013. During the twelve months ended February 28, 2015, municipal issuance in Michigan totaled $10.9 billion, an increase of 91% from the twelve months ended February 28, 2014.
 
Ohio’s economy has been growing at a moderate rate for the past two years due to strong auto sales and increasing demand in the health care industry. As of February 2015, the state’s unemployment rate was 5.1%, compared with the national rate of 5.5%. Manufacturing is the largest of Ohio’s major employment sectors and the state continued to be a leading producer of steel and autos. Like other manufacturing-heavy states, Ohio tends to have a somewhat more cyclical economy than the nation as a whole. The state has experienced a small boom in oil and gas production, due largely to hydraulic fracturing in the Utica shale field in the Appalachian Basin. The recent decline in natural gas prices has caused the number of active rotary rigs to fall sharply. Over the long term, the Utica Shale is expected to remain a growth driver for the state. The housing market in Ohio is experiencing some weakness, as it is in much of the Midwest. According to the S&P/Case-Shiller Index of prices in 20 major metropolitan areas, housing prices in Cleveland posted a year-over-year increase of 1.6% as of January 2015 (most recent data available at the time this report was prepared). On the fiscal front, Ohio has seen revenue recovery in line with its economic recovery. Fiscal year-to-date (through Feb 2015) General Fund tax receipts are 4.2% higher than the prior year-to-date collections. Income and sales taxes now make up more than half the state’s general fund revenues. In Fiscal 2013, Ohio fully funded its budget stabilization fund to its statutory maximum for the first time since 2000. The current balance in the state’s Budget Stabilization Fund is $1.47 billion, which is the maximum limit. The governor’s proposed biennium budget for Fiscal Years 2015-2016 continues a trend from prior budgets by calling for further reductions in the personal income tax rate and the taxes paid by small businesses. The reductions would be paid for in part by increases in the rates of the sales tax and cigarette tax, and a revamping of Ohio’s severance tax on oil and natural gas. As of March 2015, Moody’s and S&P rated Ohio GO debt at Aa1 and AA+, respectively, with stable outlooks. For the twelve months ended February 28, 2015, municipal issuance in Ohio totaled $10.9 billion, an increase of 20% compared with the twelve months ended February 28, 2014.
 
The economic recovery in Texas continues to outpace the national recovery and most other states. State GDP growth was largely driven by gains in the mining, real estate and professional services sectors. The state’s employment surpassed pre-recession levels in September 2011 and solid employment growth continued across all industries in 2014. The biggest year over year employment gains were seen in transportation and utility, leisure and hospitality, professional and business services. Texas’ three largest non-government employment sectors, education and health services, professional and business services, and retail trade, represented approximately 57% of the state’s workers. Strong employment and expanded labor force participation, together with positive demographic trends, created strong demand for housing and increases in the state’s housing prices and home sales. The state economy continues to exhibit elevated exposure to the mining sector, with this sector contributing 9.1% of state earnings in 2013, compared to the mining sector contributing only 1.7% of national earnings in 2013. As of February 2015, the state’s 4.3% unemployment rate was down from 5.4% in February 2014 and well below the February 2015 national unemployment rate of 5.5%. According to the S&P/Case-Shiller Index, housing prices in Dallas posted a year-over-year increase of 8.1% as of January 2015 (most recent data available at the time this report was prepared). On the fiscal front, Texas continued to benefit from strong revenue growth and the state’s Fiscal 2014-2015 biennium budget was able to restore some previous budget cuts. The 84th session of the Texas Legislature is currently in session until June 1st and is working on the Fiscal 2016-2017 budget. Texas state sales tax collections represent more than half of the state’s general revenues and Fiscal 2015 year to date collections through February 2015 were 9.8% higher than the first 6 months of Fiscal 2014. S&P upgraded its Texas general obligation (GO) rating to AAA from AA+ in December 2013, while Moody’s and Fitch rated Texas GO debt at Aaa and AAA, respectively. For the twelve months ended February 28, 2015, municipal issuance in Texas totaled $42.1 billion a 25% increase from the previous twelve months. For the most recent twelve months, Texas was ranked as the second largest state issuer only behind California.
 
8
 
Nuveen Investments

 
 

 
 
What key strategies were used to manage these Funds during the twelve-month reporting period ended February 28, 2015?
 
A backdrop of supportive technical and fundamental factors helped the municipal market rally for most of the reporting period. For the period as a whole, municipal bond prices generally rose, while interest rates declined. During this time, we continued to take a bottom-up approach to discovering sectors that appeared undervalued as well as individual credits that had the potential to perform well over the long term.
 
NAZ continued to focus on maintaining a bias toward longer and intermediate duration bonds while staying diversified, as well as actively seeking to minimize call risk especially toward the end of the reporting period. Additions to NAZ’s portfolio included charter school, higher education and hospital credits. NAZ also purchased Puerto Rico Sales Tax Financing Corporation (COFINA) bonds in May 2014, based on their attractive diversification, duration and yield. Due to ongoing developments in Puerto Rico, Nuveen made the decision to sell these bonds from the portfolio in July 2014.
 
NUM, NUO and NTX also continued to focus on buying a mix of intermediate and longer-term credits, seeking opportunities in both the new issue and secondary markets.
 
In Michigan, municipal issuance rose substantially for the reporting period. This increase was largely due to the refinancing of Detroit water and sewer bonds, which accounted for approximately $1.8 billion of Michigan’s $5.1 billion in issuance or almost all of the increase. In August 2014, Detroit announced a tender offer for the city’s water and sewer bonds, aimed at replacing some of the $5.2 billion of existing debt with lower cost bonds. Approximately $1.5 billion in existing water and sewer bonds were returned to the city by investors under the tender offer, which enabled Detroit to issue new water and sewer bonds, resulting in savings of $250 million over the life of the bonds. The city also raised about $150 million to finance sewer system improvements. As part of the deal, Detroit water and sewer bonds also were permanently removed from the city’s bankruptcy case, which led to a rally in the bonds’ prices. NUM participated in both the tender offer and the new issue of Detroit water and sewer bonds. During this reporting period, NUM also found value in higher education, electric utilities, dedicated tax bonds (Detroit Regional Convention Facility Authority) and local government obligation (GO) credits. NUO continued to find bonds that helped us accomplish our goals for the Fund, adding Cuyahoga County sales tax revenue bonds, water and sewer credits and electric utility bonds. NUO also sold a longer duration Buckeye Tobacco Settlement credit to buy a shorter duration credit from the same issuer with an equivalent yield. Our purchases in NTX focused on dedicated tax bonds, state GOs, airports, water and sewer, and higher education bonds. All of our bond purchases in the Michigan, Ohio and Texas Funds represented in-state paper.
 
In addition, we established a portfolio hedge in NUM, NUO and NTX by purchasing a credit default swap on the debt obligations of the U.S. territory of Puerto Rico. We have previously noted a correlation between the credit quality of Puerto Rico bonds and that of the overall high yield municipal bond market. Given that these portfolios regularly maintain a meaningful stake in BBB-rated and below investment grade rated bonds, we saw this as a way to reduce the Funds’ overall risk while continuing to take advantage of opportunities to invest in the lower quality portion of the market. During the reporting period, these swaps had a negligible impact on performance.
 
During this reporting period, S&P upgraded its credit rating on National Public Finance Guarantee Corp. (NPFG), the insurance subsidiary of MBIA, to AA- rating from A rating, citing NPFG’s strong operating performance and competitive position in the financial guarantee market. As a result, the ratings on the Funds’ holdings of bonds backed by insurance from NPFG were similarly upgraded to AA- rating as of mid-March 2014. This action produced an increase in the percentage of our portfolios held in the AA- rated credit quality category (and a corresponding decrease in the A rated category), improving the overall credit quality of the Funds. During this reporting period, S&P also upgraded its rating on Assured Guaranty Municipal (AGM) as well as AGM’s municipal-only insurer Municipal Assurance Corp. to AA from AA-.
 
Cash for new purchases was generated primarily by proceeds from called and matured bonds, which we worked to redeploy to keep the Funds fully invested and support their income streams. As previously mentioned, the decline in municipal yields and the flattening of the municipal yield curve relative to the Treasury curve helped to make refunding deals more attractive and we saw an
 
 Nuveen Investments
 
9

 
 

 

Portfolio Managers’ Comments (continued)
 
increase in this activity during the reporting period, which provided ample cash for purchases. NAZ took an active approach to managing heightened call activity, selling some callable bond positions at the end of 2014 and in early 2015 to try to reduce the overall portfolio’s reinvestment risk. NAZ’s other notable sell during the period included the COFINA bonds described earlier. NUM sold all of its remaining uninsured Detroit water and sewer paper, uninsured Wayne County GOs (which were eliminated prior to Fitch’s downgrade of Wayne County in March 2015) and Detroit Public Schools state aid revenue bonds. NUO sold a Wittenberg University revenue bond on deteriorating credit concerns, and NTX sold a pre-refunded bond.
 
As of February 28, 2015, all four of these Funds continued to use inverse floating rate securities. We employ inverse floaters for a variety of reasons, including duration management and income enhancement. For duration and cash management reasons, NUM and NUO found it advantageous to terminate several inverse floating rate trusts during this reporting period. This had the effect of modestly reducing leverage.
 
How did the Funds perform for the twelve-month reporting period ended February 28, 2015?
 
The tables in each Fund’s Performance Overview and Holding Summaries section of this report provide the Funds’ total returns for the one-year, five-year and ten-year periods ended February 28, 2015. Each Fund’s returns on common share net asset value (NAV) are compared with the performance of corresponding market index and Lipper classification average.
 
For the twelve months ended February 28, 2015, the total returns on common share NAV for these four Funds outperformed the returns for their respective state’s S&P Municipal Bond Index as well as that of the national S&P Municipal Bond Index. NAZ and NUO outperformed the average return for the Lipper Other States Municipal Debt Funds Classification, while NUM and NTX underperformed this Lipper average. Shareholders should note that the performance of the Lipper Other States classification represents the overall average of returns for funds from ten states with a wide variety of municipal market conditions, making direct comparisons less meaningful.
 
Key management factors that influenced the Funds’ returns during this reporting period included duration and yield curve positioning, credit exposure and sector allocation. The use of leverage also was an important factor affecting the Funds’ performance. Leverage is discussed in more detail later in this report.
 
Given the combination of declining interest rates and a flattening yield curve during this reporting period, municipal bonds with longer maturities generally outperformed those with shorter maturities. Overall, credits with maturities of 15 years or more, especially those at the longest end of the municipal yield curve, outperformed the general municipal market, while bonds at the shortest end of the curve produced the weakest results. Because these four Funds were generally overweighted in the longer segments of the municipal curve that performed best and generally underweighted in the underperforming shorter end of the curve, duration and yield curve positioning was a significant positive contributor to their performance.
 
During the reporting period, lower rated bonds generally outperformed higher quality bonds, as the municipal market rally continued and investors became more willing to accept risk. NUO and NTX were the most favorably positioned for this environment, with overweights in the stronger performing, lower rated bonds and underweights in the weaker performing, higher rated bonds contributing positively to performance. NAZ benefited from similar positioning, but gains were slightly offset by a AA-rated Puerto Rico credit that detracted from returns. For NUM, an overweight to AA-rated bonds (which underperformed) and an underweight to BB-rated bonds (which outperformed) were detrimental to performance.
 
The influence of sector allocation varied among the Funds during the reporting period. Although an overweight in the underper-forming housing sector was modestly disadvantageous to performance, NUO benefited from its underweight in state GO credits, a sector that underperformed, and an overweight in health care credits, a group that outperformed. For NAZ, the impact on overall returns was small, but still positive. Exposure to Tax-Supported credits, particularly dedicated tax credits hurt NAZ’s returns. Despite being underweight in transportation this sector was a positive contributor as the positions held were longer duration bonds. An overweight in the industrial development/pollution control revenue credits boosted results. Among individual credits, NAZ had
 
10
 
Nuveen Investments

 
 

 

positive results from a Phoenix Sky Harbor International Airport bond, two charter school bonds issued by the Phoenix Industrial Development Authority (Choice Academies Inc. and Legacy Traditional Schools), two hospital systems (John C. Lincoln Health Network and University Medical Center) and tax increment dirt bonds, which are so-called because they are secured by land values.
 
For NUM and NTX, sector allocation was an overall detractor from performance. Specifically, although exposure to health care helped NUM’s performance, it did not offset the negative effect of exposure to higher education and pre-refunded bonds. NTX was hurt by health care credits and an underweight in toll roads, which overwhelmed gains from its position in dedicated tax bonds.
 
We also continue to monitor two situations in the broader municipal market for any impact on the Funds’ holdings and performance: the ongoing economic problems of Puerto Rico and the bankruptcy filing of Detroit, Michigan. Regarding Puerto Rico, shareholders should note that NUM, NUO and NTX had sold out of their exposures to Puerto Rico debt prior to this reporting period, while NAZ had an allocation of approximately 1% throughout the reporting period. The Puerto Rico credits offered higher yields, added diversification and triple exemption (i.e., exemption from most federal, state, and local taxes). However, Puerto Rico’s continued economic weakening, escalating debt service obligations, and long-standing inability to deliver a balanced budget led to multiple downgrades on its debt over the past two years. Following the latest rating reduction by Moody’s in July 2014, Puerto Rico general obligation debt was rated B2/BB+/BB (below investment grade) by Moody’s, S&P and Fitch, respectively, with negative outlooks.
 
On February 6, 2015 a federal court found Puerto Rico’s Recovery Act to be unconstitutional. Though the Commonwealth is pursuing an appeal of the ruling, the outcome is uncertain. Puerto Rico’s non-voting Representative in Congress recently introduced legislation that would make chapter 9 bankruptcy available to the Commonwealth’s public corporations. A congressional committee hearing was held on February 26, 2015, but the bill has not advanced out of committee.
 
In light of the evolving economic situation in Puerto Rico, Nuveen’s credit analysis of the Commonwealth had previously considered the possibility of a default and restructuring of public corporations and we adjusted our portfolios to prepare for such an outcome, although no such default or restructuring has occurred to date. The Nuveen complex’s entire exposure to obligations of the government of Puerto Rico and other Puerto Rico issuers totaled 0.36% of assets under management as of February 28, 2015. As of February 28, 2015, NAZs limited exposure to Puerto Rico generally was invested in bonds that were insured (which we believe adds value), pre-refunded (and therefore backed by securities such as U.S. Treasuries), or tobacco settlement bonds. Overall, the small size of our exposures meant that our Puerto Rico holdings had a negligible impact on performance.
 
The second situation that we continued to monitor was the City of Detroit’s filing for chapter 9 in federal bankruptcy court in July 2013. Burdened by decades of population loss, changes in the auto manufacturing industry and significant tax base deterioration, Detroit had been under severe financial stress for an extended period prior to the filing. Before Detroit could exit bankruptcy, issues surrounding the city’s complex debt portfolio, numerous union contracts, significant legal questions and more than 100,000 creditors had to be resolved. By October 2014, all of the major creditors had reached an agreement on the city’s plan to restructure its $18.5 billion of debt and emerge from bankruptcy on November 7, 2014. The U.S. Bankruptcy Court approved the city’s bankruptcy exit plan, thereby erasing approximately $7 billion in debt. The settlement plan also provided for $1.7 billion to be reinvested in the city for improved public safety, blight removal and upgraded basic services. As described in the key strategies section earlier in this commentary, Detroit’s tender offer for the city’s water and sewer bonds in August 2014 was a positive event, resulting in beneficial savings for the city and the permanent removal of the water and sewer credits from the city’s bankruptcy case. In general, Detroit water and sewer credits rallied following these positive developments. Shareholders of NUM should note that this Fund has no exposure to Detroit general obligation bonds and is underweighted in Detroit water and sewer bonds relative to the Michigan index.
 
 Nuveen Investments
 
11

 
 

 
 
Fund Leverage
 
IMPACT OF THE FUNDS’ LEVERAGE STRATEGY ON PERFORMANCE
 
One important factor impacting the returns of the Funds relative to their comparative benchmarks was the Funds’ use of leverage through their issuance of preferred shares and/or investments in inverse floating rate securities, which represent leveraged investments in underlying bonds. The Funds use leverage because our research has shown that, over time, leveraging provides opportunities for additional income, particularly in the recent market environment where short-term market rates are at or near historical lows, meaning that the short-term rates the Fund has been paying on its leveraging instruments have been much lower than the interest the Fund has been earning on its portfolio of long-term bonds that it has bought with the proceeds of that leverage. However, use of leverage also can expose the Fund to additional price volatility. When a Fund uses leverage, the Fund will experience a greater increase in its net asset value if the municipal bonds acquired through the use of leverage increase in value, but it will also experience a correspondingly larger decline in its net asset value if the bonds acquired through leverage decline in value, which will make the Fund’s net asset value more volatile, and its total return performance more variable over time. In addition, income in levered funds will typically decrease in comparison to unlevered funds when short-term interest rates increase and increase when short-term interest rates decrease. Leverage had a positive impact on the performance of the Funds over this reporting period.
 
As of February 28, 2015, the Funds’ percentages of leverage are shown in the accompanying table.
 
     
NAZ
   
NUM
   
NUO
   
NTX
 
Effective Leverage*
   
35.59
%
 
34.58
%
 
35.20
%
 
32.20
%
Regulatory Leverage*
   
31.27
%
 
32.57
%
 
31.96
%
 
31.03
%
 
*
Effective leverage is a Fund’s effective economic leverage, and includes both regulatory leverage and the leverage effects of certain derivative and other investments in a Fund’s portfolio that increase the Fund’s investment exposure. Currently, the leverage effects of Tender Option Bond (TOB) inverse floater holdings are included in effective leverage values, in addition to any regulatory leverage. Regulatory leverage consists of preferred shares issued or borrowings of a Fund. Both of these are part of a Fund’s capital structure. Regulatory leverage is subject to asset coverage limits set forth in the Investment Company Act of 1940.
 
THE FUNDS’ REGULATORY LEVERAGE
 
As of February 28, 2015, the Funds have issued and outstanding MuniFund Term Preferred (MTP) Shares, Variable Rate MuniFund Term Preferred (VMTP) Shares and/or Variable Rate Demand Preferred (VRDP) Shares as shown in the accompanying table.
 
 
MTP Shares
     
VMTP Shares
 
VRDP Shares
 
       
Shares Issued
 
Annual
 
NYSE
     
Shares Issued
     
Shares Issued
 
   
Series
 
at Liquidation Value
 
Dividend Rate
 
Ticker
 
Series
 
at Liquidation Value
 
Series
 
at Liquidation Value
 
NAZ
   
 
$
   
   
   
2016
 
$
79,000,000
   
 
$
 
NUM
   
 
$
   
   
   
2016
 
$
159,000,000
   
 
$
 
NUO
   
 
$
   
   
   
 
$
   
1
 
$
148,000,000
 
NTX
   
2015
 
$
70,920,000
   
2.30
%
 
NTX PRCCL
   
 
$
   
 
$
 
 
Refer to Notes to Financial Statements, Note 1 – General Information and Significant Accounting Policies for further details on MTP, VMTP and VRDP Shares.
 
12
 
Nuveen Investments

 
 

 
 
Common Share Information
 
DISTRIBUTION INFORMATION
 
The following information regarding the Funds’ distributions is current as of February 28, 2015. Each Fund’s distribution levels may vary over time based on each Fund’s investment activities and portfolio investment value changes.
 
During the current reporting period, each Fund’s distributions to common shareholders were as shown in the accompanying table.
 
   
Per Common Share Amounts
Ex-Dividend Date
   
NAZ
   
NUM
   
NUO
   
NTX
 
March 2014
 
$
0.0655
 
$
0.0740
 
$
0.0800
 
$
0.0580
 
April
   
0.0655
   
0.0740
   
0.0800
   
0.0580
 
May
   
0.0655
   
0.0740
   
0.0800
   
0.0580
 
June
   
0.0655
   
0.0740
   
0.0800
   
0.0580
 
July
   
0.0665
   
0.0740
   
0.0800
   
0.0580
 
August
   
0.0665
   
0.0740
   
0.0800
   
0.0580
 
September
   
0.0665
   
0.0705
   
0.0740
   
0.0545
 
October
   
0.0665
   
0.0705
   
0.0740
   
0.0545
 
November
   
0.0665
   
0.0705
   
0.0740
   
0.0545
 
December
   
0.0665
   
0.0675
   
0.0740
   
0.0545
 
January
   
0.0665
   
0.0675
   
0.0740
   
0.0545
 
February 2015
   
0.0665
   
0.0675
   
0.0740
   
0.0545
 
                           
Ordinary Income Distribution*
 
$
0.0003
 
$
0.0002
 
$
0.0027
 
$
0.0010
 
                           
Market Yield**
   
5.55
%
 
5.85
%
 
5.77
%
 
4.56
%
Taxable-Equivalent Yield**
   
8.08
%
 
8.49
%
 
8.46
%
 
6.33
%
 
*
Distribution paid in December 2014.
   
**
Market Yield is based on the Fund’s current annualized monthly distribution divided by the Fund’s current market price as of the end of the reporting period. Taxable-Equivalent Yield represents the yield that must be earned on a fully taxable investment in order to equal the yield of the Fund on an after-tax basis. It is based on a combined federal and state income tax rate of 31.3%, 31.1% and 31.8% for the Arizona, Michigan and Ohio Funds, respectively. The Texas Fund is based on a federal income tax rate of 28.0%. When comparing a Fund to investments that generate qualified dividend income, the Taxable-Equivalent Yield is lower.
 
Each Fund in this report seeks to pay regular monthly dividends out of its net investment income at a rate that reflects its past and projected net income performance. To permit each Fund to maintain a more stable monthly dividend, the Fund may pay dividends at a rate that may be more or less than the amount of net income actually earned by the Fund during the period. If a Fund has cumulatively earned more than it has paid in dividends, it will hold the excess in reserve as undistributed net investment income (UNII) as part of the Fund’s net asset value. Conversely, if a Fund has cumulatively paid in dividends more than it has earned, the excess will constitute a negative UNII that will likewise be reflected in the Fund’s net asset value. Each Fund will, over time, pay all its net investment income as dividends to shareholders.
 
As of February 28, 2015, the Funds had positive UNII balances for tax purposes and positive UNII balances for financial reporting purposes.
 
 Nuveen Investments
 
13

 
 

 
 
All monthly dividends paid by each Fund during the current reporting period, were paid from net investment income. If a portion of the Fund’s monthly distributions was sourced from or comprised of elements other than net investment income, including capital gains and/or a return of capital, shareholders would have received a notice to that effect. For financial reporting purposes, the composition and per share amounts of each Fund’s dividends for the reporting period are presented in this report’s Statement of Changes in Net Assets and Financial Highlights, respectively. For income tax purposes, distribution information for each Fund as of its most recent tax year end is presented in Note 6 – Income Tax Information within the Notes to Financial Statements of this report.
 
COMMON SHARE REPURCHASES
 
During August 2014, the Funds’ Board of Trustees reauthorized an open-market share repurchase program, allowing each Fund to repurchase an aggregate of up to approximately 10% of its outstanding shares.
 
As of February 28, 2015, and since the inception of the Funds’ repurchase programs, the Funds have cumulatively repurchased and retired common shares as shown in the accompanying table.
 
   
NAZ
 
NUM
 
NUO
 
NTX
 
Common Shares Cumulatively Repurchased and Retired
 
 
185,000
 
 
 
Common Shares Authorized for Repurchase
 
1,155,000
 
2,085,000
 
1,850,000
 
1,005,000
 
 
During the current reporting period, the Funds did not repurchase any of their outstanding common shares.
 
COMMON SHARE EQUITY SHELF PROGRAMS
 
During the reporting period, NTX was authorized to issue an additional 950,000 common shares through its ongoing equity shelf program. Under this program, the Fund, subject to market conditions, may raise additional capital from time to time in varying amounts and offering methods at a net price at or above the Fund’s NAV per common share.
 
During the current reporting period, NTX did not sell any of its common shares through its equity shelf program.
 
As of June 30, 2014, NTX’s shelf offering registration statement is no longer effective, Therefore, NTX may not issue additional common shares under its equity shelf program until a new registration statement is effective.
 
OTHER COMMON SHARE INFORMATION
 
As of February 28, 2015, and during the current reporting period, the Funds’ common share prices were trading at a premium/ (discount) to their common share NAVs as shown in the accompanying table.
 
     
NAZ
   
NUM
   
NUO
   
NTX
 
Common Share NAV
 
$
15.02
 
$
15.80
 
$
17.01
 
$
15.72
 
Common Share Price
 
$
14.37
 
$
13.85
 
$
15.40
 
$
14.35
 
Premium/(Discount) to NAV
   
(4.33
)%
 
(12.34
)%
 
(9.47
)%
 
(8.72
)%
12-Month Average Premium/(Discount) to NAV
   
(5.79
)%
 
(10.22
)%
 
(6.83
)%
 
(7.09
)%
 
14
 
Nuveen Investments

 
 

 
 
Risk Considerations
 
Fund Shares are not guaranteed or endorsed by any bank or other insured depository institution, and are not federally insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation. Past performance is no guarantee of future results. Fund common shares are subject to a variety of risks, including:
 
Investment, Price and Market Risk. An investment in common shares is subject to investment risk, including the possible loss of the entire principal amount that you invest. Your investment in common shares represents an indirect investment in the municipal securities owned by the Fund, which generally trade in the over-the-counter markets. Shares of closed-end investment companies like these Funds frequently trade at a discount to their net asset value (NAV). Your common shares at any point in time may be worth less than your original investment, even after taking into account the reinvestment of Fund dividends and distributions.
 
Leverage Risk. Each Fund’s use of leverage creates the possibility of higher volatility for the Fund’s per share NAV, market price, distributions and returns. There is no assurance that a Fund’s leveraging strategy will be successful. Certain aspects of the recently adopted Volcker Rule may limit the availability of tender option bonds, which are used by the Funds for leveraging and duration management purposes. The effects of this new Rule, expected to take effect in mid-2015, may make it more difficult for a Fund to maintain current or desired levels of leverage and may cause the Fund to incur additional expenses to maintain its leverage.
 
Tax Risk. The tax treatment of Fund distributions may be affected by new IRS interpretations of the Internal Revenue Code and future changes in tax laws and regulations.
 
Issuer Credit Risk. This is the risk that a security in a Fund’s portfolio will fail to make dividend or interest payments when due.
 
Interest Rate Risk. Fixed-income securities such as bonds, preferred, convertible and other debt securities will decline in value if market interest rates rise.
 
Reinvestment Risk. If market interest rates decline, income earned from a Fund’s portfolio may be reinvested at rates below that of the original bond that generated the income.
 
Call Risk or Prepayment Risk. Issuers may exercise their option to prepay principal earlier than scheduled, forcing a Fund to reinvest in lower-yielding securities.
 
Inverse Floater Risk. The Funds invest in inverse floaters. Due to their leveraged nature, these investments can greatly increase a Fund’s exposure to interest rate risk and credit risk. In addition, investments in inverse floaters involve the risk that the Fund could lose more than its original principal investment.
 
 Nuveen Investments
 
15

 
 

 

NAZ
 
 
Nuveen Arizona Premium Income Municipal Fund
 
Performance Overview and Holding Summaries as of February 28, 2015
 
Refer to the Glossary of Terms Used in this Report for further definition of the terms used within this section.
 
Average Annual Total Returns as of February 28, 2015
 
   
Average Annual
 
   
1-Year
 
5-Year
 
10-Year
 
NAZ at Common Share NAV
 
12.01%
 
7.27%
 
5.57%
 
NAZ at Common Share Price
 
18.94%
 
7.30%
 
4.34%
 
S&P Municipal Bond Arizona Index
 
6.17%
 
5.27%
 
4.87%
 
S&P Municipal Bond Index
 
6.47%
 
5.19%
 
4.75%
 
Lipper Other States Municipal Debt Funds Classification Average
 
11.51%
 
7.05%
 
5.44%
 
 
Past performance is not predictive of future results. Current performance may be higher or lower than the data shown. Returns do not reflect the deduction of taxes that shareholders may have to pay on Fund distributions or upon the sale of Fund shares. Returns at NAV are net of Fund expenses, and assume reinvestment of distributions. Comparative index and Lipper return information is provided for the Fund’s shares at NAV only. Indexes and Lipper averages are not available for direct investment.
 
 
16
 
Nuveen Investments

 
 

 
 
This data relates to the securities held in the Fund’s portfolio of investments as of the end of the reporting period. It should not be construed as a measure of performance for the Fund itself. Holdings are subject to change.
 
Ratings shown are the highest rating given by one of the following national rating agencies: Standard & Poor’s Group, Moody’s Investors Service, Inc. or Fitch, Inc. Credit ratings are subject to change. AAA, AA, A and BBB are investment grade ratings; BB, B, CCC, CC, C and D are below-investment grade ratings. Certain bonds backed by U.S. Government or agency securities are regarded as having an implied rating equal to the rating of such securities. Holdings designated N/R are not rated by these national rating agencies.
 
Fund Allocation
 
(% of net assets)
 
Long-Term Municipal Bonds
145.5%
Other Assets Less Liabilities
1.6%
Net Assets Plus Floating Rate Obligations
 
& VMTP Shares, at Liquidation Value
147.1%
Floating Rate Obligations
(1.6)%
VMTP Shares, at Liquidation Value
(45.5)%
Net Assets
100%

Portfolio Composition
 
(% of total investments)
 
Tax Obligation/Limited
24.8%
Health Care
17.6%
Education and Civic Organizations
16.3%
Tax Obligation/General
13.0%
Utilities
12.4%
Water and Sewer
7.6%
U.S. Guaranteed
5.4%
Other
2.9%
Total
100%

Credit Quality
 
(% of total investment exposure)
 
AAA/U.S. Guaranteed
15.4%
AA
39.9%
A
27.6%
BBB
8.6%
BB or Lower
2.6%
N/R (not rated)
5.9%
Total
100%
 
Nuveen Investments
 
17

 
 

 

NUM
 
 
Nuveen Michigan Quality Income Municipal Fund
 
Performance Overview and Holding Summaries as of February 28, 2015
 
Refer to the Glossary of Terms Used in this Report for further definition of the terms used within this section.
 
Average Annual Total Returns as of February 28, 2015
 
   
Average Annual
 
   
1-Year
 
5-Year
 
10-Year
 
NUM at Common Share NAV
 
11.45%
 
7.22%
 
5.59%
 
NUM at Common Share Price
 
9.48%
 
7.76%
 
3.95%
 
S&P Municipal Bond Michigan Index
 
7.35%
 
5.68%
 
4.83%
 
S&P Municipal Bond Index
 
6.47%
 
5.19%
 
4.75%
 
Lipper Other States Municipal Debt Funds Classification Average
 
11.51%
 
7.05%
 
5.44%
 
 
Past performance is not predictive of future results. Current performance may be higher or lower than the data shown. Returns do not reflect the deduction of taxes that shareholders may have to pay on Fund distributions or upon the sale of Fund shares. Returns at NAV are net of Fund expenses, and assume reinvestment of distributions. Comparative index and Lipper return information is provided for the Fund’s shares at NAV only. Indexes and Lipper averages are not available for direct investment.
 
 
18
 
Nuveen Investments

 
 

 
 
This data relates to the securities held in the Fund’s portfolio of investments as of the end of the reporting period. It should not be construed as a measure of performance for the Fund itself. Holdings are subject to change.
 
Ratings shown are the highest rating given by one of the following national rating agencies: Standard & Poor’s Group, Moody’s Investors Service, Inc. or Fitch, Inc. Credit ratings are subject to change. AAA, AA, A and BBB are investment grade ratings; BB, B, CCC, CC, C and D are below-investment grade ratings. Certain bonds backed by U.S. Government or agency securities are regarded as having an implied rating equal to the rating of such securities. Holdings designated N/R are not rated by these national rating agencies.
 
Fund Allocation
 
(% of net assets)
 
Long-Term Municipal Bonds
146.3%
Other Assets Less Liabilities
4.0%
Net Assets Plus Floating Rate Obligations
 
& VMTP Shares, at Liquidation Value
150.3%
Floating Rate Obligations
(2.0)%
VMTP Shares, at Liquidation Value
(48.3)%
Net Assets
100%

Portfolio Composition
 
(% of total investments)
 
Tax Obligation/General
26.5%
Health Care
12.3%
U.S. Guaranteed
11.8%
Tax Obligation/Limited
11.2%
Water and Sewer
11.2%
Education and Civic Organizations
9.6%
Utilities
8.1%
Other
9.3%
Total
100%

Credit Quality
 
(% of total investment exposure)
 
AAA/U.S. Guaranteed
20.9%
AA
63.9%
A
9.9%
BBB
1.2%
BB or Lower
3.5%
N/R (not rated)
0.6%
Total
100%
 
Nuveen Investments
 
19

 
 

 

NUO
 
 
Nuveen Ohio Quality Income Municipal Fund
 
Performance Overview and Holding Summaries as of February 28, 2015
 
Refer to the Glossary of Terms Used in this Report for further definition of the terms used within this section.
 
Average Annual Total Returns as of February 28, 2015
 
   
Average Annual
 
   
1-Year
 
5-Year
10-Year
 
NUO at Common Share NAV
 
12.23%
 
6.97%
5.77%
 
NUO at Common Share Price
 
10.79%
 
5.85%
4.32%
 
S&P Municipal Bond Ohio Index
 
7.07%
 
5.49%
4.68%
 
S&P Municipal Bond Index
 
6.47%
 
5.19%
4.75%
 
Lipper Other States Municipal Debt Funds Classification Average
 
11.51%
 
7.05%
5.44%
 
 
Past performance is not predictive of future results. Current performance may be higher or lower than the data shown. Returns do not reflect the deduction of taxes that shareholders may have to pay on Fund distributions or upon the sale of Fund shares. Returns at NAV are net of Fund expenses, and assume reinvestment of distributions. Comparative index and Lipper return information is provided for the Fund’s shares at NAV only. Indexes and Lipper averages are not available for direct investment.
 
 
20
 
Nuveen Investments

 
 

 

This data relates to the securities held in the Fund’s portfolio of investments as of the end of the reporting period. It should not be construed as a measure of performance for the Fund itself. Holdings are subject to change.
 
Ratings shown are the highest rating given by one of the following national rating agencies: Standard & Poor’s Group, Moody’s Investors Service, Inc. or Fitch, Inc. Credit ratings are subject to change. AAA, AA, A and BBB are investment grade ratings; BB, B, CCC, CC, C and D are below-investment grade ratings. Certain bonds backed by U.S. Government or agency securities are regarded as having an implied rating equal to the rating of such securities. Holdings designated N/R are not rated by these national rating agencies.
 
Fund Allocation
 
(% of net assets)
 
Long-Term Municipal Bonds
144.5%
Other Assets Less Liabilities
2.5%
Net Assets Plus VRDP Shares, at
 
Liquidation Value
147.0%
VRDP Shares, at Liquidation Value
(47.0)%
Net Assets
100%

Portfolio Composition
 
(% of total investments)
 
Health Care
21.8%
Tax Obligation/General
20.5%
Tax Obligation/Limited
20.4%
U.S. Guaranteed
9.3%
Water and Sewer
8.2%
Education and Civic Organizations
5.7%
Other
14.1%
Total
100%

Credit Quality
 
(% of total investment exposure)
 
AAA/U.S. Guaranteed
21.7%
AA
48.9%
A
19.2%
BBB
5.7%
BB or Lower
4.2%
N/R (not rated)
0.3%
Total
100%
 
Nuveen Investments
 
21

 
 

 

NTX
 
 
Nuveen Texas Quality Income Municipal Fund
 
Performance Overview and Holding Summaries as of February 28, 2015
 
Refer to the Glossary of Terms Used in this Report for further definition of the terms used within this section.
 
Average Annual Total Returns as of February 28, 2015
 
   
Average Annual
 
   
1-Year
 
5-Year
10-Year
 
NTX at Common Share NAV
 
10.81%
 
6.63%
5.57%
 
NTX at Common Share Price
 
11.07%
 
3.21%
4.44%
 
S&P Municipal Bond Texas Index
 
6.57%
 
5.36%
5.04%
 
S&P Municipal Bond Index
 
6.47%
 
5.19%
4.75%
 
Lipper Other States Municipal Debt Funds Classification Average
 
11.51%
 
7.05%
5.44%
 
 
Past performance is not predictive of future results. Current performance may be higher or lower than the data shown. Returns do not reflect the deduction of taxes that shareholders may have to pay on Fund distributions or upon the sale of Fund shares. Returns at NAV are net of Fund expenses, and assume reinvestment of distributions. Comparative index and Lipper return information is provided for the Fund’s shares at NAV only. Indexes and Lipper averages are not available for direct investment.
 
 
22
 
Nuveen Investments

 
 

 
 
This data relates to the securities held in the Fund’s portfolio of investments as of the end of the reporting period. It should not be construed as a measure of performance for the Fund itself. Holdings are subject to change.
 
Ratings shown are the highest rating given by one of the following national rating agencies: Standard & Poor’s Group, Moody’s Investors Service, Inc. or Fitch, Inc. Credit ratings are subject to change. AAA, AA, A and BBB are investment grade ratings; BB, B, CCC, CC, C and D are below-investment grade ratings. Certain bonds backed by U.S. Government or agency securities are regarded as having an implied rating equal to the rating of such securities. Holdings designated N/R are not rated by these national rating agencies.
 
Fund Allocation
 
(% of net assets)
 
Long-Term Municipal Bonds
144.1%
Other Assets Less Liabilities
3.4%
Net Assets Plus Floating Rate Obligations
 
& MTP Shares, at Liquidation Value
147.5%
Floating Rate Obligations
(2.5)%
MTP Shares, at Liquidation Value
(45.0)%
Net Assets
100%

Portfolio Composition
 
(% of total investments)
 
Tax Obligation/General
21.4%
Transportation
11.8%
Water and Sewer
11.1%
U.S. Guaranteed
11.1%
Utilities
11.0%
Tax Obligation/Limited
10.6%
Education and Civic Organizations
10.4%
Health Care
7.5%
Other
5.1%
Total
100%

Credit Quality
 
(% of total investment exposure)
 
AAA/U.S. Guaranteed
26.9%
AA
34.5%
A
20.7%
BBB
15.9%
BB or Lower
1.6%
N/R (not rated)
0.4%
Total
100%
 
Nuveen Investments
 
23

 
 

 
 
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
 
To the Board of Trustees and Shareholders of
Nuveen Arizona Premium Income Municipal Fund
Nuveen Michigan Quality Income Municipal Fund
Nuveen Ohio Quality Income Municipal Fund
Nuveen Texas Quality Income Municipal Fund:
 
We have audited the accompanying statement of assets and liabilities, including the portfolios of investments, of Nuveen Arizona Premium Income Municipal Fund, Nuveen Michigan Quality Income Municipal Fund, Nuveen Ohio Quality Income Municipal Fund and Nuveen Texas Quality Income Municipal Fund (the “Funds”) as of February 28, 2015, and the related statements of operations, changes in net assets and cash flows, and the financial highlights for the year then ended. These financial statements and financial highlights are the responsibility of the Funds’ management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements and financial highlights based on our audits. The statements of changes in net assets and the financial highlights for the periods presented through February 28, 2014, were audited by other auditors whose report dated April 25, 2014, expressed an unqualified opinion on those statements and those financial highlights.
 
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements and financial highlights are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. Our procedures included confirmation of securities owned as of February 28, 2015, by correspondence with the custodian and brokers or other appropriate auditing procedures. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
 
In our opinion, the financial statements and financial highlights referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Funds as of February 28, 2015, the results of their operations, the changes in their net assets, their cash flows and the financial highlights for the year then ended, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.
 
 
 
/s/ KPMG LLP
Chicago, Illinois
April 28, 2015
 
24
 
Nuveen Investments

 
 

 

NAZ
   
 
Nuveen Arizona Premium Income Municipal Fund
 
 
Portfolio of Investments
February 28, 2015
 
 
Principal
     
Optional Call
         
 
Amount (000)
 
Description (1)
 
Provisions (2)
Ratings (3)
   
Value
 
     
LONG-TERM INVESTMENTS – 145.5% (100.0% of Total Investments)
             
     
MUNICIPAL BONDS – 145.5% (100.0% of Total Investments)
             
     
Consumer Staples – 0.6% (0.4% of Total Investments)
             
$
1,010
 
Puerto Rico, The Children’s Trust Fund, Tobacco Settlement Asset-Backed Refunding Bonds, Series 2002, 5.375%, 5/15/33
 
5/15 at 100.00
BBB+
 
$
1,012,555
 
     
Education and Civic Organizations – 23.7% (16.3% of Total Investments)
             
 
3,480
 
Arizona Board of Regents, Arizona State University System Revenue Bonds, Refunding Series 2013A, 5.000%, 7/01/43
 
No Opt. Call
AA
   
3,933,131
 
 
2,815
 
Arizona Board of Regents, University of Arizona, SPEED Revenue Bonds, Stimulus Plan for Economic and Educational Development, Series 2014, 5.000%, 8/01/44
 
8/24 at 100.00
Aa3
   
3,199,951
 
 
2,240
 
Arizona Board of Regents, University of Arizona, System Revenue Bonds, Tender Option Bond Trust 2015-XF0053, 18.007%, 6/01/20 (IF)
 
No Opt. Call
Aa2
   
3,400,387
 
 
1,400
 
Arizona Board of Regents, University of Arizona, SPEED Revenue Bonds, Stimulus Plan for Economic and Educational Development, Series 2013, 5.000%, 8/01/21
 
No Opt. Call
Aa3
   
1,678,376
 
     
Arizona State University, System Revenue Bonds, Series 2005:
             
 
2,705
 
5.000%, 7/01/20 – AMBAC Insured
 
7/15 at 100.00
Aa3
   
2,750,201
 
 
750
 
5.000%, 7/01/21 – AMBAC Insured
 
7/15 at 100.00
Aa3
   
762,503
 
 
2,000
 
Glendale Industrial Development Authority, Arizona, Revenue Bonds, Midwestern University, Refunding Series 2007, 5.000%, 5/15/31
 
5/22 at 100.00
A–
   
2,231,620
 
 
3,775
 
Glendale Industrial Development Authority, Arizona, Revenue Bonds, Midwestern University, Refunding Series 2010, 5.125%, 5/15/40
 
5/20 at 100.00
A+
   
4,236,453
 
 
1,875
 
Northern Arizona University, System Revenue Bonds, Refunding Series 2014, 5.000%, 6/01/40
 
6/24 at 100.00
A+
   
2,131,631
 
 
910
 
Northern Arizona University, System Revenue Bonds, Series 2012, 5.000%, 6/01/41
 
6/21 at 100.00
A+
   
1,000,600
 
 
900
 
Phoenix Industrial Development Authority, Arizona, Education Facility Revenue Bonds, Choice Academies Charter Schools Project, Series 2012, 5.625%, 9/01/42
 
9/22 at 100.00
BB+
   
952,173
 
 
755
 
Phoenix Industrial Development Authority, Arizona, Education Facility Revenue Bonds, fbo Brighter Choice Foundation Charter Middle Schools Project, Albany, New York, Series 2012, 7.500%, 7/01/42
 
7/22 at 100.00
B+
   
707,684
 
 
500
 
Phoenix Industrial Development Authority, Arizona, Education Facility Revenue Bonds, Legacy Traditional Schools Project, Series 2014A, 6.750%, 7/01/44
 
7/24 at 100.00
N/R
   
574,105
 
 
585
 
Phoenix Industrial Development Authority, Arizona, Education Revenue Bonds, Great Hearts Academies – Veritas Project, Series 2012, 6.300%, 7/01/42
 
7/21 at 100.00
BB
   
624,751
 
 
745
 
Phoenix Industrial Development Authority, Arizona, Education Revenue Bonds, Painted Rock Academy Charter School Project, Series 2012A, 7.500%, 7/01/42
 
7/20 at 100.00
N/R
   
767,074
 
 
3,675
 
Phoenix Industrial Development Authority, Arizona, Lease Revenue Bonds, Rowan University Project, Series 2012, 5.000%, 6/01/42 (UB) (4)
 
6/22 at 100.00
A
   
3,998,547
 
 
200
 
Pima County Industrial Development Authority, Arizona, Charter School Revenue Bonds, Desert Heights Charter School, Series 2014, 7.250%, 5/01/44
 
5/24 at 100.00
N/R
   
210,256
 
 
745
 
Pima County Industrial Development Authority, Arizona, Education Revenue Bonds, Carden Traditional Schools Project, Series 2012, 7.500%, 1/01/42
 
1/22 at 100.00
B
   
734,734
 
 
1,000
 
Pima County Industrial Development Authority, Arizona, Education Revenue Bonds, Horizon Community Learning Center Project, Series 2000, 5.250%, 6/01/35
 
6/15 at 100.00
BBB
   
1,002,130
 
     
Pima County Industrial Development Authority, Arizona, Education Revenue Bonds, Paradise Education Center Project, Series 2010:
             
 
745
 
6.000%, 6/01/40
 
6/19 at 100.00
BB+
   
781,356
 
 
200
 
6.100%, 6/01/45
 
6/19 at 100.00
BB+
   
210,208
 
 
655
 
Pima County Industrial Development Authority, Arizona, Educational Revenue Bonds, Paradise Education Center Charter School, Series 2006, 6.000%, 6/01/36
 
6/16 at 100.00
BB+
   
665,133
 
 
Nuveen Investments
 
25

 
 

 

NAZ
Nuveen Arizona Premium Income Municipal Fund
 
 
Portfolio of Investments (continued)
February 28, 2015

 
Principal
     
Optional Call
         
 
Amount (000)
 
Description (1)
 
Provisions (2)
Ratings (3)
   
Value
 
     
Education and Civic Organizations (continued)
             
$
1,000
 
Pima County Industrial Development Authority, Arizona, Educational Revenue Bonds, Valley Academy Charter School Project, Series 2008, 6.500%, 7/01/38
 
7/18 at 100.00
Baa3
 
$
1,058,520
 
 
780
 
Student and Academic Services LLC, Arizona, Lease Revenue Bonds, Northern Arizona University Project, Series 2014, 5.000%, 6/01/39 – BAM Insured
 
6/24 at 100.00
AA
   
880,386
 
 
250
 
Sun Devil Energy LLC, Arizona, Revenue Refunding Bonds, Arizona State University Project, Series 2008, 5.000%, 7/01/22
 
No Opt. Call
AA–
   
296,303
 
 
1,350
 
Tucson Industrial Development Authority, Arizona, Charter School Revenue Bonds, Arizona Agribusiness and Equine Center Charter School, Series 2004A, 6.125%, 9/01/34
 
9/15 at 100.00
BB+
   
1,351,836
 
 
825
 
Yavapai County Industrial Development Authority, Arizona, Charter School Revenue Bonds, Arizona Agribusiness and Equine Center Charter School, Series 2011, 7.875%, 3/01/42
 
3/21 at 100.00
BB+
   
975,101
 
 
36,860
 
Total Education and Civic Organizations
         
41,115,150
 
     
Health Care – 25.5% (17.6% of Total Investments)
             
 
3,500
 
Arizona Health Facilities Authority, Hospital Revenue Bonds, Banner Health Systems, Series 2007A, 5.000%, 1/01/25
 
1/17 at 100.00
AA–
   
3,757,845
 
 
7,730
 
Arizona Health Facilities Authority, Hospital Revenue Bonds, Banner Health Systems, Series 2008D, 5.500%, 1/01/38
 
1/18 at 100.00
AA–
   
8,442,781
 
 
1,200
 
Arizona Health Facilities Authority, Hospital Revenue Bonds, Banner Health Systems, Series 2014A, 5.000%, 1/01/44
 
1/24 at 100.00
AA–
   
1,349,448
 
 
5,100
 
Arizona Health Facilities Authority, Hospital System Revenue Bonds, Phoenix Children’s Hospital, Refunding Series 2012A, 5.000%, 2/01/42
 
2/22 at 100.00
BBB+
   
5,519,577
 
     
Arizona Health Facilities Authority, Revenue Bonds, Scottsdale Lincoln Hospitals Project, Series 2014A:
             
 
2,280
 
5.000%, 12/01/39
 
12/24 at 100.00
A2
   
2,571,658
 
 
2,500
 
5.000%, 12/01/42
 
12/24 at 100.00
A2
   
2,806,575
 
 
7,560
 
Maricopa County Industrial Development Authority, Arizona, Health Facility Revenue Bonds, Catholic Healthcare West, Series 2007A, 5.250%, 7/01/32
 
7/17 at 100.00
A
   
8,042,706
 
 
120
 
Puerto Rico Industrial, Tourist, Educational, Medical and Environmental Control Facilities Financing Authority, Hospital Revenue Bonds, Hospital de la Concepcion, Series 2000A, 6.375%, 11/15/15
 
5/15 at 100.00
AA+
   
120,560
 
 
1,120
 
Scottsdale Industrial Development Authority, Arizona, Hospital Revenue Bonds, Scottsdale Healthcare, Series 2006C. Re-offering, 5.000%, 9/01/35 – AGC Insured
 
9/20 at 100.00
AA
   
1,257,178
 
     
Show Low Industrial Development Authority, Arizona, Hospital Revenue Bonds, Navapache Regional Medical Center, Series 2005:
             
 
1,415
 
5.000%, 12/01/25 – RAAI Insured
 
12/15 at 100.00
BBB
   
1,434,909
 
 
1,160
 
5.000%, 12/01/30 – RAAI Insured
 
12/15 at 100.00
BBB
   
1,174,512
 
 
2,585
 
University Medical Center Corporation, Tucson, Arizona, Hospital Revenue Bonds, Series 2011, 6.000%, 7/01/39
 
7/21 at 100.00
Baa2
   
3,059,373
 
     
University Medical Center Corporation, Tucson, Arizona, Hospital Revenue Bonds, Series 2013:
             
 
200
 
5.000%, 7/01/19
 
No Opt. Call
Baa2
   
223,472
 
 
800
 
5.000%, 7/01/20
 
No Opt. Call
Baa2
   
900,528
 
     
Yavapai County Industrial Development Authority, Arizona, Hospital Revenue Bonds, Yavapai Regional Medical Center, Series 2013A:
             
 
210
 
5.000%, 8/01/19
 
No Opt. Call
Baa1
   
232,149
 
 
1,000
 
5.250%, 8/01/33
 
8/23 at 100.00
Baa1
   
1,121,700
 
     
Yuma Industrial Development Authority, Arizona, Hospital Revenue Bonds, Yuma Regional Medical Center, Series 2014A:
             
 
1,000
 
5.000%, 8/01/22
 
No Opt. Call
A–
   
1,170,230
 
 
1,000
 
5.250%, 8/01/32
 
8/24 at 100.00
A–
   
1,153,800
 
 
40,480
 
Total Health Care
         
44,339,001
 
 
26
 
Nuveen Investments

 
 

 
 
 
Principal
     
Optional Call
         
 
Amount (000)
 
Description (1)
 
Provisions (2)
Ratings (3)
   
Value
 
     
Long-Term Care – 0.8% (0.6% of Total Investments)
             
$
550
 
Arizona Health Facilities Authority, Health Care Facilities Revenue Bonds, The Beatitudes Campus Project, Series 2006, 5.100%, 10/01/22
 
10/16 at 100.00
N/R
 
$
555,869
 
 
780
 
Tempe Industrial Development Authority, Arizona, Revenue Bonds, Friendship Village of Tempe Project, Refunding Series 2012A, 6.000%, 12/01/32
 
12/21 at 100.00
N/R
   
851,292
 
 
1,330
 
Total Long-Term Care
         
1,407,161
 
     
Tax Obligation/General – 19.0% (13.0% of Total Investments)
             
 
2,500
 
Chandler, Arizona, General Obligation Bonds, Refunding Series 2014, 5.000%, 7/01/24
 
No Opt. Call
AAA
   
3,144,800
 
     
Dysart Unified School District Number 89, Maricopa County, Arizona, General Obligation Bonds, Refunding Series 2014:
             
 
1,000
 
5.000%, 7/01/26
 
7/24 at 100.00
AA–
   
1,197,040
 
 
525
 
5.000%, 7/01/27
 
7/24 at 100.00
AA–
   
623,411
 
 
2,140
 
El Mirage, Arizona, General Obligation Bonds Series 2012, 5.000%, 7/01/42 – AGM Insured
 
7/22 at 100.00
AA
   
2,372,532
 
 
1,000
 
Maricopa County Elementary School District 83 Cartwright, Arizona, General Obligation Bonds, School Improvement, Project 2010, Series 2011A, 5.375%, 7/01/30 – AGM Insured
 
7/21 at 100.00
AA
   
1,142,450
 
 
1,020
 
Maricopa County School District 6, Arizona, General Obligation Refunding Bonds, Washington Elementary School, Series 2002A, 5.375%, 7/01/16 – AGM Insured
 
No Opt. Call
AA
   
1,088,401
 
 
775
 
Maricopa County School District 79 Litchfield Elementary, Arizona, General Obligation Bonds, Series 2011, 5.000%, 7/01/23
 
7/21 at 100.00
Aa2
   
924,343
 
 
1,200
 
Maricopa County Unified School District 95 Queen Creek, Arizona, General Obligation Bonds, Series 2008, 5.000%, 7/01/27 – AGM Insured
 
7/18 at 100.00
Aa3
   
1,331,940
 
 
1,405
 
Mesa, Arizona, General Obligation Bonds, Series 2002, 5.375%, 7/01/15 – FGIC Insured
 
No Opt. Call
Aa2
   
1,430,360
 
 
1,370
 
Pima County Continental Elementary School District 39, Arizona, General Obligation Bonds, Series 2011A, 6.000%, 7/01/30 – AGM Insured
 
7/21 at 100.00
AA
   
1,662,659
 
 
1,000
 
Pima County Unified School District 08 Flowing Wells, Arizona, General Obligation Bonds, Series 2011B, 5.375%, 7/01/29
 
7/21 at 100.00
A+
   
1,123,260
 
 
2,895
 
Pima County Unified School District 12 Sunnyside, Arizona, General Obligation Bonds, School Improvement Project 2011, Series 2014D, 5.000%, 7/01/34 – AGM Insured
 
7/24 at 100.00
AA
   
3,312,893
 
 
1,750
 
Pima County Unified School District 6, Marana, Arizona, General Obligation Bonds, School Improvement Project 2010 Series 2011A, 5.000%, 7/01/25
 
7/21 at 100.00
A+
   
2,005,728
 
 
4,530
 
Pinal County Unified School District 1, Florence, Arizona, General Obligation Bonds, Series 2008C, 5.250%, 7/01/28
 
7/18 at 100.00
A
   
5,056,114
 
     
Scottsdale, Arizona, General Obligation Bonds, Preserve Acquisition Series 1999:
             
 
1,310
 
5.000%, 7/01/32
 
7/21 at 100.00
AAA
   
1,503,487
 
 
1,360
 
5.000%, 7/01/33
 
7/21 at 100.00
AAA
   
1,557,431
 
 
1,705
 
5.000%, 7/01/34
 
7/21 at 100.00
AAA
   
1,947,144
 
     
Western Maricopa Education Center District 402, Maricopa County, Arizona, General Obligation Bonds, School Improvement Project 2012, Series 2014B:
             
 
715
 
4.500%, 7/01/33
 
7/24 at 100.00
AA–
   
785,899
 
 
665
 
4.500%, 7/01/34
 
7/24 at 100.00
AA–
   
728,135
 
 
28,865
 
Total Tax Obligation/General
         
32,938,027
 
     
Tax Obligation/Limited – 36.1% (24.8% of Total Investments)
             
 
2,310
 
Arizona Sports and Tourism Authority, Tax Revenue Bonds, Multipurpose Stadium Facility Project, Refunding Senior Series 2012A, 5.000%, 7/01/36
 
7/22 at 100.00
A1
   
2,503,024
 
     
Arizona State Transportation Board, Highway Revenue Bonds, Refunding Subordinate Series 2011A:
             
 
1,275
 
5.000%, 7/01/16
 
No Opt. Call
AA+
   
1,356,052
 
 
1,025
 
5.000%, 7/01/36
 
7/21 at 100.00
AA+
   
1,167,988
 
     
Buckeye, Arizona, Festival Ranch Community Facilities District General Obligation Bonds, Series 2012:
             
 
345
 
5.000%, 7/15/27 – BAM Insured
 
7/22 at 100.00
AA
   
383,806
 
 
1,085
 
5.000%, 7/15/31 – BAM Insured
 
7/22 at 100.00
AA
   
1,183,410
 
 
Nuveen Investments
 
27

 
 

 

NAZ
Nuveen Arizona Premium Income Municipal Fund
 
 
Portfolio of Investments (continued)
February 28, 2015
 
 
Principal
     
Optional Call
         
 
Amount (000)
 
Description (1)
 
Provisions (2)
Ratings (3)
   
Value
 
     
Tax Obligation/Limited (continued)
             
$
612
 
Centerra Community Facilities District, Goodyear, Arizona, General Obligation Bonds, Series 2005, 5.500%, 7/15/29
 
7/15 at 100.00
N/R
 
$
613,848
 
 
498
 
Eastmark Community Facilities District 1, Mesa, Arizona, Special Assessment Revenue Bonds, Assessment District 1, Series 2013, 5.250%, 7/01/38
 
7/23 at 100.00
N/R
   
527,447
 
     
Estrella Mountain Ranch Community Facilities District, Arizona, Special Assessment Bonds, Montecito Assessment District, Series 2007:
             
 
429
 
5.700%, 7/01/27
 
1/17 at 100.00
N/R
   
440,356
 
 
461
 
5.800%, 7/01/32
 
1/17 at 100.00
N/R
   
472,202
 
 
662
 
Estrella Mountain Ranch Community Facilities District, Goodyear, Arizona, Special Assessment Lien Bonds, Series 2001A, 7.875%, 7/01/25
 
7/15 at 100.00
N/R
   
664,059
 
 
1,500
 
Goodyear, Arizona, Community Facilities General District 1, Arizona, General Obligation Refunding Bonds, Series 2013, 5.000%, 7/15/23
 
No Opt. Call
A–
   
1,724,595
 
     
Government of Guam, Business Privilege Tax Bonds, Series 2011A:
             
 
510
 
5.000%, 1/01/31
 
1/22 at 100.00
A
   
567,661
 
 
200
 
5.125%, 1/01/42
 
1/22 at 100.00
A
   
221,028
 
 
1,500
 
Government of Guam, Business Privilege Tax Bonds, Series 2012B-1, 5.000%, 1/01/37
 
1/22 at 100.00
A
   
1,645,395
 
 
1,550
 
Greater Arizona Development Authority, Infrastructure Revenue Bonds, Series 2006A, 5.000%, 8/01/23 – NPFG Insured
 
8/16 at 100.00
AA–
   
1,647,201
 
 
250
 
La Paz County, Arizona, Excise Tax Revenue Bonds, Judgement Series 2011A, 4.750%, 7/01/36
 
7/17 at 100.00
AA
   
258,333
 
 
1,425
 
Marana, Arizona, Pledged Excise Tax Revenue Bonds, Refunding Series 2013, 5.000%, 7/01/33
 
7/23 at 100.00
AA
   
1,624,928
 
 
2,862
 
Marana, Arizona, Tangerine Farms Road Improvement District Revenue Bonds, Series 2006, 4.600%, 1/01/26
 
7/16 at 100.00
A2
   
2,909,366
 
 
680
 
Marley Park Community Facilities District, City of Surprise, Arizona, Limited Tax General Obligation Bonds, Series 2008 (Bank Qualified), 6.100%, 7/15/32
 
7/17 at 100.00
N/R
   
701,318
 
 
1,160
 
Merrill Ranch Community Facilities District 1, Florence, Arizona, General Obligation Bonds, Series 2008A, 7.400%, 7/15/33
 
7/18 at 100.00
BBB–
   
1,278,065
 
 
300
 
Page, Arizona, Pledged Revenue Bonds, Refunding Series 2011, 5.000%, 7/01/26
 
7/21 at 100.00
AA–
   
341,952
 
 
1,500
 
Palm Valley Community Facility District 3, Goodyear, Arizona, General Obligation Bonds, Series 2006, 5.300%, 7/15/31
 
7/16 at 100.00
N/R
   
1,516,815
 
 
1,000
 
Palm Valley Community Facility District 3, Goodyear, Arizona, Limited Tax General Obligation Bonds, Series 2007, 5.800%, 7/15/32
 
7/17 at 100.00
N/R
   
1,024,660
 
 
400
 
Parkway Community Facilities District 1, Prescott Valley, Arizona, General Obligation Bonds, Series 2006, 5.350%, 7/15/31
 
7/16 at 100.00
N/R
   
403,680
 
 
1,010
 
Phoenix Civic Improvement Corporation, Arizona, Transit Excise Tax Revenue Refunding Bonds, Light Rail Project, Series 2013, 5.000%, 7/01/20
 
No Opt. Call
AA
   
1,195,173
 
 
2,500
 
Phoenix Industrial Development Authority, Arizona, Education Facility Revenue Bonds, JMF-Higley 2012 LLC Project, Series 2012, 5.000%, 12/01/36
 
No Opt. Call
A
   
2,743,900
 
 
580
 
Phoenix Mesa Gateway Airport Authority, Arizona, Special Facility Revenue Bonds, Mesa Project, Series 2012, 5.000%, 7/01/38 (Alternative Minimum Tax)
 
7/22 at 100.00
AA+
   
636,678
 
 
2,095
 
Pinal County Industrial Development Authority, Arizona, Correctional Facilities Contract Revenue Bonds, Florence West Prison LLC, Series 2002A, 5.000%, 10/01/18 – ACA Insured
 
4/15 at 100.00
BBB–
   
2,098,059
 
 
1,000
 
Pinal County, Arizona, Pledged Revenue Obligations, Series 2014, 5.000%, 8/01/33
 
8/24 at 100.00
AA–
   
1,159,590
 
 
1,140
 
Pinetop Fire District of Navajo County, Arizona, Certificates of Participation, Series 2008, 7.750%, 6/15/29
 
6/16 at 102.00
A3
   
1,186,979
 
 
1,000
 
Regional Public Transportation Authority, Arizona, Transportation Excise Tax Revenue Bonds, Maricopa County Public Transportation Fund Series 2014, 5.250%, 7/01/22
 
No Opt. Call
AA+
   
1,237,130
 
 
28
 
Nuveen Investments

 
 

 
 
 
Principal
     
Optional Call
         
 
Amount (000)
 
Description (1)
 
Provisions (2)
Ratings (3)
   
Value
 
     
Tax Obligation/Limited (continued)
             
     
San Luis, Arizona, Pledged Excise Tax Revenue Bonds, Refunding Series 2014A:
             
$
1,400
 
5.000%, 7/01/34 – BAM Insured
 
7/24 at 100.00
AA
 
$
1,587,572
 
 
2,100
 
5.000%, 7/01/38 – BAM Insured
 
7/24 at 100.00
AA
   
2,370,564
 
 
3,000
 
Scottsdale Municipal Property Corporation, Arizona, Excise Tax Revenue Bonds, Refunding Series 2006, 5.000%, 7/01/24
 
No Opt. Call
AAA
   
3,743,280
 
 
5,000
 
Scottsdale Municipal Property Corporation, Arizona, Excise Tax Revenue Bonds, Water & Sewer Improvements Project, Series 2010, 5.000%, 7/01/36
 
7/20 at 100.00
AAA
   
5,723,900
 
 
1,570
 
Tartesso West Community Facility District, Buckeye, Arizona, Limited Tax General Obligation Bonds, Series 2007, 5.900%, 7/15/32
 
7/17 at 100.00
N/R
   
1,633,444
 
 
4,000
 
Tempe, Arizona, Transit Excise Tax Revenue Obligation Bonds, Refunding Series 2012, 5.000%, 7/01/37
 
7/22 at 100.00
AAA
   
4,543,440
 
 
1,750
 
Virgin Islands Public Finance Authority, Matching Fund Loan Notes Revenue Bonds, Senior Lien Series 2010A, 5.000%, 10/01/29
 
10/20 at 100.00
BBB
   
1,922,358
 
 
3,145
 
Vistancia Community Facilities District, Peoria, Arizona, General Obligation Bonds, Series 2005, 5.750%, 7/15/24
 
7/15 at 100.00
A1
   
3,186,105
 
 
1,508
 
Watson Road Community Facilities District, Arizona, Special Assessment Revenue Bonds, Series 2005, 6.000%, 7/01/30
 
7/16 at 100.00
N/R
   
1,545,112
 
 
1,000
 
Westpark Community Facilities District, Buckeye, Arizona, General Obligation Tax Increment Bonds Series 2006, 5.250%, 7/15/31
 
7/16 at 100.00
N/R
   
1,011,210
 
 
57,337
 
Total Tax Obligation/Limited
         
62,701,683
 
     
Transportation – 2.7% (1.9% of Total Investments)
             
 
180
 
Phoenix Civic Improvement Corporation, Arizona, Junior Lien Airport Revenue Bonds, Series 2010A, 5.000%, 7/01/40
 
7/20 at 100.00
A+
   
198,329
 
     
Phoenix Civic Improvement Corporation, Arizona, Senior Lien Airport Revenue Bonds, Refunding Series 2013:
             
 
1,785
 
5.000%, 7/01/30 (Alternative Minimum Tax)
 
7/23 at 100.00
AA–
   
2,025,582
 
 
2,215
 
5.000%, 7/01/32 (Alternative Minimum Tax)
 
7/23 at 100.00
AA–
   
2,492,783
 
 
4,180
 
Total Transportation
         
4,716,694
 
     
U.S. Guaranteed – 7.9% (5.4% of Total Investments) (5)
             
 
1,265
 
Gila County Unified School District 10 Payson, Arizona, School Improvement Bonds, Project 2006, Series 2008B, 5.750%, 7/01/28 (Pre-refunded 7/01/18)
 
7/18 at 100.00
Aa3 (5)
   
1,470,082
 
 
1,840
 
Glendale Industrial Development Authority, Arizona, Revenue Bonds, John C. Lincoln Health Network, Series 2005B, 5.000%, 12/01/37 (Pre-refunded 12/01/15)
 
12/15 at 100.00
N/R (5)
   
1,907,712
 
 
2,965
 
Glendale Industrial Development Authority, Arizona, Revenue Bonds, John C. Lincoln Health Network, Series 2007, 5.000%, 12/01/42 (Pre-refunded 12/01/17)
 
12/17 at 100.00
N/R (5)
   
3,313,714
 
 
2,280
 
Greater Arizona Development Authority, Infrastructure Revenue Bonds, Series 2006-1, 5.000%, 8/01/22 (Pre-refunded 8/01/16) – NPFG Insured
 
8/16 at 100.00
AA– (5)
   
2,431,301
 
 
730
 
Maricopa County Industrial Development Authority, Arizona, Hospital Revenue Refunding Bonds, Samaritan Health Services, Series 1990A, 7.000%, 12/01/16 – NPFG Insured (ETM)
 
No Opt. Call
N/R (5)
   
772,289
 
 
665
 
Maricopa County Union High School District 210 Phoenix, Arizona, General Obligation Bonds, Series 2006C, 5.000%, 7/01/24 (Pre-refunded 7/01/16) – NPFG Insured
 
7/16 at 100.00
AA (5)
   
707,228
 
 
630
 
Mesa, Arizona, Utility System Revenue Refunding Bonds, Series 2002, 5.250%, 7/01/17 – FGIC Insured (ETM)
 
No Opt. Call
Aa2 (5)
   
697,700
 
 
1,045
 
Pima County Industrial Development Authority, Arizona, Charter School Revenue Bonds, Noah Webster Basic Schools Inc., Series 2004, 6.000%, 12/15/24 (Pre-refunded 4/23/15)
 
4/15 at 100.00
BBB– (5)
   
1,045,167
 
 
1,340
 
Yuma & La Paz Counties Community College District, Arizona, General Obligation Bonds, Series 2006, 5.000%, 7/01/21 (Pre-refunded 7/01/16) – NPFG Insured
 
7/16 at 100.00
AA– (5)
   
1,425,090
 
 
12,760
 
Total U.S. Guaranteed
         
13,770,283
 
 
Nuveen Investments
 
29

 
 

 

NAZ
Nuveen Arizona Premium Income Municipal Fund
 
 
Portfolio of Investments (continued)
February 28, 2015
 
 
Principal
     
Optional Call
         
 
Amount (000)
 
Description (1)
 
Provisions (2)
Ratings (3)
   
Value
 
     
Utilities – 18.1% (12.4% of Total Investments)
             
$
1,495
 
Apache County Industrial Development Authority, Arizona, Pollution Control Revenue Bonds, Tucson Electric Power Company, Series 20102A, 4.500%, 3/01/30
 
3/22 at 100.00
A3
 
$
1,611,326
 
     
Arizona Power Authority, Special Obligation Power Resource Revenue Refunding Crossover Bonds, Hoover Project, Series 2001:
             
 
1,000
 
5.250%, 10/01/15
 
No Opt. Call
AA
   
1,030,290
 
 
1,500
 
5.250%, 10/01/17
 
No Opt. Call
AA
   
1,676,175
 
 
4,310
 
Maricopa County Pollution Control Corporation, Arizona, Pollution Control Revenue Refunding Bonds, Southern California Edison Company, Series 2000A, 5.000%, 6/01/35
 
6/20 at 100.00
Aa3
   
4,887,971
 
 
370
 
Mesa, Arizona, Utility System Revenue Refunding Bonds, Series 2002, 5.250%, 7/01/17 – FGIC Insured
 
No Opt. Call
Aa2
   
410,267
 
 
1,800
 
Pinal County Electrical District 3, Arizona, Electric System Revenue Bonds, Refunding Series 2011, 5.250%, 7/01/36
 
7/21 at 100.00
A
   
2,015,766
 
 
2,000
 
Salt River Project Agricultural Improvement and Power District, Arizona, Electric System Revenue Bonds, Series 2005A, 5.000%, 1/01/35
 
No Opt. Call
Aa1
   
2,076,260
 
 
2,500
 
Salt River Project Agricultural Improvement and Power District, Arizona, Electric System Revenue Bonds, Tender Option Bond Trust 09-9W, 17.767%, 1/01/38 (IF) (4)
 
1/18 at 100.00
Aa1
   
3,459,100
 
     
Salt Verde Financial Corporation, Arizona, Senior Gas Revenue Bonds, Citigroup Energy Inc Prepay Contract Obligations, Series 2007:
             
 
4,500
 
5.500%, 12/01/29
 
No Opt. Call
A–
   
5,437,530
 
 
5,665
 
5.000%, 12/01/37
 
No Opt. Call
A–
   
6,552,309
 
 
2,370
 
Yuma County Industrial Development Authority, Arizona, Exempt Revenue Bonds, Far West Water & Sewer Inc. Refunding, Series 2007A, 6.375%, 12/01/37 (Alternative Minimum Tax)
 
12/17 at 100.00
N/R
   
2,243,418
 
 
27,510
 
Total Utilities
         
31,400,412
 
     
Water and Sewer – 11.1% (7.6% of Total Investments)
             
 
500
 
City of Goodyear, Arizona Subordinate Lien Water and Sewer Revenue Obligations, Series 2011, 5.500%, 7/01/41
 
7/21 at 100.00
AA
   
579,845
 
 
1,005
 
Cottonwood, Arizona, Senior Lien Water System Revenue Bonds, Municipal Property Corporation, Series 2004, 5.000%, 7/01/24 – SYNCORA GTY Insured
 
7/15 at 100.00
BBB+
   
1,006,518
 
 
500
 
Glendale, Arizona, Water and Sewer Revenue Bonds, Refunding Series 2012, 5.000%, 7/01/28
 
7/22 at 100.00
AA
   
583,385
 
 
2,855
 
Goodyear, Arizona, Water and Sewer Revenue Obligations, Series 2010, 5.625%, 7/01/39
 
7/20 at 100.00
AA–
   
3,329,757
 
 
500
 
Guam Waterworks Authority, Water and Wastewater System Revenue Bonds, Series 2013, 5.250%, 7/01/33
 
7/23 at 100.00
A–
   
569,025
 
 
2,000
 
Phoenix Civic Improvement Corporation, Arizona, Junior Lien Water System Revenue Bonds, Series 2014A, 5.000%, 7/01/39
 
7/24 at 100.00
AAA
   
2,329,100
 
     
Phoenix Civic Improvement Corporation, Arizona, Junior Lien Water System Revenue Refunding Bonds, Series 2001:
             
 
1,250
 
5.500%, 7/01/21 – FGIC Insured
 
No Opt. Call
AAA
   
1,545,988
 
 
1,040
 
5.500%, 7/01/22 – FGIC Insured
 
No Opt. Call
AAA
   
1,304,430
 
 
1,135
 
Phoenix Civic Improvement Corporation, Arizona, Wastewater System Revenue Bonds, Refunding Junior Lien Series 2014, 5.000%, 7/01/29
 
7/24 at 100.00
AA+
   
1,349,288
 
 
1,500
 
Pima County, Arizona, Sewer System Revenue Obligations, Series 2012A, 5.000%, 7/01/26
 
No Opt. Call
AA–
   
1,774,995
 
 
1,000
 
Pima County, Arizona, Sewer System Revenue Obligations, Series 2014, 5.000%, 7/01/22
 
No Opt. Call
AA–
   
1,210,810
 
 
30
 
Nuveen Investments

 
 

 
 
 
Principal
     
Optional Call
         
 
Amount (000)
 
Description (1)
 
Provisions (2)
Ratings (3)
   
Value
 
     
Water and Sewer (continued)
             
     
Surprise Municipal Property Corporation, Arizona, Wastewater System Revenue Bonds, Series 2007:
             
$
990
 
4.700%, 4/01/22
 
4/15 at 100.00
A
 
$
994,029
 
 
1,970
 
4.900%, 4/01/32
 
4/17 at 100.00
A
   
2,023,170
 
 
500
 
Tucson, Arizona, Water System Revenue Bonds, Refunding Series 2013A, 5.000%, 7/01/23
 
No Opt. Call
AA
   
611,955
 
 
16,745
 
Total Water and Sewer
         
19,212,295
 
$
227,077
 
Total Long-Term Investments (cost $231,298,587)
         
252,613,261
 
     
Floating Rate Obligations – (1.6)%
         
(2,755,000
)
     
Variable Rate MuniFund Term Preferred Shares, at Liquidation Value – (45.5)% (6)
         
(79,000,000
)
     
Other Assets Less Liabilities – 1.6%
         
2,789,882
 
     
Net Assets Applicable to Common Shares – 100%
       
$
173,648,143
 
 
(1)
All percentages shown in the Portfolio of Investments are based on net assets applicable to common shares unless otherwise noted.
(2)
Optional Call Provisions (not covered by the report of independent registered public accounting firm): Dates (month and year) and prices of the earliest optional call or redemption. There may be other call provisions at varying prices at later dates. Certain mortgage-backed securities may be subject to periodic principal paydowns.
(3)
Ratings (not covered by the report of independent registered public accounting firm): Using the highest of Standard & Poor’s Group (“Standard & Poor’s”), Moody’s Investors Service, Inc. (“Moody’s”) or Fitch, Inc. (“Fitch”) rating. Ratings below BBB by Standard & Poor’s, Baa by Moody’s or BBB by Fitch are considered to be below investment grade. Holdings designated N/R are not rated by any of these national rating agencies.
(4)
Investment, or portion of investment, has been pledged to collateralize the net payment obligations for investments in inverse floating rate transactions.
(5)
Backed by an escrow or trust containing sufficient U.S. Government or U.S. Government agency securities, which ensure the timely payment of principal and interest. Certain bonds backed by U.S. Government or agency securities are regarded as having an implied rating equal to the rating of such securities.
(6)
Variable Rate MuniFund Term Preferred Shares, at Liquidation Value as a percentage of Total Investments is 31.3%.
(ETM)
Escrowed to maturity.
(IF)
Inverse floating rate investment.
(UB)
Underlying bond of an inverse floating rate trust reflected as a financing transaction. See Notes to Financial Statements, Note 3 – Portfolio Securities and Investments in Derivatives, Inverse Floating Rate Securities for more information.
 
See accompanying notes to financial statements.
 
 Nuveen Investments
 
31

 
 

 

NUM
   
 
Nuveen Michigan Quality Income Municipal Fund
 
 
Portfolio of Investments
February 28, 2015
 
 
Principal
     
Optional Call
         
 
Amount (000)
 
Description (1)
 
Provisions (2)
Ratings (3)
   
Value
 
     
LONG-TERM INVESTMENTS – 146.3% (100.0% of Total Investments)
             
     
MUNICIPAL BONDS – 146.3% (100.0% of Total Investments)
             
     
Consumer Staples – 4.5% (3.1% of Total Investments)
             
$
7,100
 
Michigan Tobacco Settlement Finance Authority, Tobacco Settlement Asset-Backed Revenue Bonds, Senior Lien Series 2007A, 6.000%, 6/01/34
 
6/17 at 100.00
B–
 
$
6,296,209
 
 
8,650
 
Michigan Tobacco Settlement Finance Authority, Tobacco Settlement Asset-Backed Revenue Bonds, Series 2008A, 6.875%, 6/01/42
 
6/18 at 100.00
BB–
   
8,571,977
 
 
15,750
 
Total Consumer Staples
         
14,868,186
 
     
Education and Civic Organizations – 14.1% (9.6% of Total Investments)
             
 
1,220
 
Central Michigan University Board of Trustees, General Revenue Bonds, Refunding Series 2014, 5.000%, 10/01/39
 
10/24 at 100.00
Aa3
   
1,401,243
 
 
1,000
 
Conner Creek Academy East, Michigan, Public School Revenue Bonds, Series 2007, 5.250%, 11/01/36
 
11/16 at 100.00
B+
   
743,560
 
 
1,255
 
Detroit Community High School, Michigan, Public School Academy Revenue Bonds, Series 2005, 5.750%, 11/01/30
 
11/15 at 100.00
B–
   
915,623
 
 
500
 
Grand Valley State University, Michigan, General Revenue Bonds, Refunding Series 2014B, 5.000%, 12/01/28
 
12/24 at 100.00
A+
   
584,665
 
 
805
 
Michigan Finance Authority, Public School Academy Revenue Bonds, Detroit Service Learning Academy Project, Refunding Series 2011, 7.000%, 10/01/31
 
10/21 at 100.00
BB–
   
855,908
 
     
Michigan Higher Education Facilities Authority, Limited Obligation Revenue Refunding Bonds, Kettering University, Series 2001:
             
 
1,685
 
5.500%, 9/01/17 – AMBAC Insured
 
3/15 at 100.00
N/R
   
1,687,342
 
 
1,170
 
5.000%, 9/01/26 – AMBAC Insured
 
3/15 at 100.00
N/R
   
1,170,304
 
 
240
 
Michigan Public Educational Facilities Authority, Charter School Revenue Bonds, American Montessori Academy, Series 2007, 6.500%, 12/01/37
 
12/17 at 100.00
N/R
   
241,961
 
 
5,000
 
Michigan State University, General Revenue Bonds, Refunding Series 2010C, 5.000%, 2/15/40
 
2/20 at 100.00
AA+
   
5,639,000
 
 
7,790
 
Michigan State University, General Revenue Bonds, Series 2013A, 5.000%, 8/15/41
 
8/23 at 100.00
AA+
   
8,884,729
 
 
3,175
 
Michigan Technological University, General Revenue Bonds, Refunding Series 2012A, 5.000%, 10/01/34
 
10/21 at 100.00
A1
   
3,547,459
 
 
4,000
 
University of Michigan, General Revenue Bonds, Series 2014A, 5.000%, 4/01/44
 
4/24 at 100.00
AAA
   
4,615,320
 
 
5,000
 
Wayne State University, Michigan, General Revenue Bonds, Refunding Series 2008, 5.000%, 11/15/35 – AGM Insured
 
No Opt. Call
AA
   
5,566,200
 
 
3,700
 
Wayne State University, Michigan, General Revenue Bonds, Series 2013A, 5.000%, 11/15/40
 
11/23 at 100.00
AA–
   
4,178,891
 
 
525
 
Western Michigan University, General Revenue Bonds, Refunding Series 2011, 5.000%, 11/15/31
 
11/21 at 100.00
A1
   
585,380
 
     
Western Michigan University, General Revenue Bonds, Refunding Series 2013:
             
 
750
 
5.250%, 11/15/33 – AGM Insured
 
11/23 at 100.00
AA
   
854,475
 
 
4,250
 
5.000%, 11/15/39 – AGM Insured
 
11/23 at 100.00
AA
   
4,772,665
 
 
42,065
 
Total Education and Civic Organizations
         
46,244,725
 
     
Health Care – 18.0% (12.3% of Total Investments)
             
 
4,000
 
Grand Traverse County Hospital Financial Authority, Michigan, Revenue Bonds, Munson Healthcare, Refunding Series 2011A, 5.000%, 7/01/29
 
7/21 at 100.00
AA–
   
4,412,680
 
 
1,800
 
Jackson County Hospital Finance Authority, Michigan, Hospital Revenue Bonds, Allegiance Health, Refunding Series 2010A, 5.000%, 6/01/37 – AGM Insured
 
6/20 at 100.00
AA
   
1,992,402
 
     
Kent Hospital Finance Authority, Michigan, Revenue Refunding Bonds, Spectrum Health System, Refunding Series 2011C:
             
 
5,500
 
5.000%, 1/15/31
 
1/22 at 100.00
AA
   
6,143,115
 
 
2,000
 
5.000%, 1/15/42
 
1/22 at 100.00
AA
   
2,176,920
 
 
32
 
Nuveen Investments

 
 

 
 
 
Principal
     
Optional Call
         
 
Amount (000)
 
Description (1)
 
Provisions (2)
Ratings (3)
   
Value
 
     
Health Care (continued)
             
$
1,780
 
Michigan Finance Authority, Hospital Revenue Bonds, Beaumont Health Credit Group, Refunding Series 2015A, 5.000%, 8/01/33
 
8/24 at 100.00
A1
 
$
2,019,552
 
 
5,505
 
Michigan Finance Authority, Hospital Revenue Bonds, Crittenton Hospital Medical Center, Refunding Series 2012A, 5.000%, 6/01/39
 
No Opt. Call
BBB
   
5,893,378
 
 
3,930
 
Michigan Finance Authority, Hospital Revenue Bonds, Oakwood Obligated Group, Refunding Series 2013, 5.000%, 8/15/31
 
8/23 at 100.00
A1
   
4,465,030
 
     
Michigan Finance Authority, Revenue Bonds, Oakwood Obligated Group, Refunding Series 2012:
             
 
1,000
 
5.000%, 11/01/25
 
11/22 at 100.00
A1
   
1,150,750
 
 
1,000
 
5.000%, 11/01/26
 
No Opt. Call
A1
   
1,144,060
 
 
3,750
 
5.000%, 11/01/42
 
11/22 at 100.00
A1
   
4,043,138
 
 
3,000
 
Michigan Finance Authority, Revenue Bonds, Sparrow Obligated Group, Series 2012, 5.000%, 11/15/42
 
11/22 at 100.00
A+
   
3,241,770
 
 
9,650
 
Michigan Finance Authority, Revenue Bonds, Trinity Health Credit Group, Refunding Series 2011, 5.000%, 12/01/39
 
12/21 at 100.00
AA
   
10,841,582
 
     
Michigan State Hospital Finance Authority, Hospital Revenue Bonds, Henry Ford Health System, Refunding Series 2009:
             
 
150
 
5.000%, 11/15/20
 
11/19 at 100.00
A–
   
171,227
 
 
7,300
 
5.750%, 11/15/39
 
11/19 at 100.00
A–
   
8,289,880
 
 
2,000
 
Michigan State Hospital Finance Authority, Hospital Revenue Refunding Bonds, Henry Ford Health System, Series 2006A, 5.250%, 11/15/46
 
11/16 at 100.00
A–
   
2,098,100
 
 
1,000
 
Michigan State Hospital Finance Authority, Revenue Bonds, Trinity Health Care Group, Series 2009C, 5.000%, 12/01/48
 
6/22 at 100.00
AA
   
1,088,220
 
 
53,365
 
Total Health Care
         
59,171,804
 
     
Housing/Multifamily – 4.4% (3.0% of Total Investments)
             
 
2,675
 
Michigan Housing Development Authority, FNMA Limited Obligation Multifamily Housing Revenue Bonds, Parkview Place Apartments, Series 2002A, 5.550%, 12/01/34 (Alternative Minimum Tax)
 
12/20 at 101.00
AA
   
2,929,125
 
 
695
 
Michigan Housing Development Authority, Limited Obligation Revenue Bonds, Breton Village Green Project, Series 1993, 5.625%, 10/15/18 – AGM Insured
 
4/15 at 100.00
AA
   
702,207
 
 
1,055
 
Michigan Housing Development Authority, Limited Obligation Revenue Bonds, Walled Lake Villa Project, Series 1993, 6.000%, 4/15/18 – AGM Insured
 
4/15 at 100.00
AA
   
1,057,511
 
     
Michigan Housing Development Authority, Multifamily Housing Revenue Bonds, Series 1988A:
             
 
1,395
 
3.375%, 11/01/16 (Alternative Minimum Tax)
 
11/15 at 100.00
AA
   
1,411,433
 
 
1,405
 
3.875%, 11/01/17 (Alternative Minimum Tax)
 
11/15 at 100.00
AA
   
1,421,593
 
 
2,300
 
Michigan Housing Development Authority, Rental Housing Revenue Bonds, Series 2006D, 5.125%, 4/01/31 – AGM Insured (Alternative Minimum Tax)
 
7/15 at 100.00
AA
   
2,321,091
 
 
1,825
 
Michigan Housing Development Authority, Rental Housing Revenue Bonds, Series 2010A, 5.000%, 10/01/35
 
10/20 at 100.00
AA
   
1,949,538
 
 
1,725
 
Michigan Housing Development Authority, Rental Housing Revenue Bonds, Series 2012A-2, 4.625%, 10/01/41
 
4/22 at 100.00
AA
   
1,797,450
 
 
1,000
 
Michigan Housing Development Authority, Rental Housing Revenue Bonds, Series 2012D, 4.000%, 10/01/42
 
No Opt. Call
AA
   
1,008,590
 
 
14,075
 
Total Housing/Multifamily
         
14,598,538
 
     
Housing/Single Family – 0.9% (0.6% of Total Investments)
             
 
2,495
 
Michigan Housing Development Authority, Single Family Homeownership Revenue Bonds, Series 2010C, 5.500%, 12/01/28 (Alternative Minimum Tax)
 
6/20 at 100.00
AA+
   
2,660,843
 
 
380
 
Michigan Housing Development Authority, Single Family Homeownership Revenue Bonds, Series 2011A, 4.600%, 12/01/26
 
6/21 at 100.00
AA+
   
397,784
 
 
2,875
 
Total Housing/Single Family
         
3,058,627
 
 
Nuveen Investments
 
33

 
 

 

NUM
Nuveen Michigan Quality Income Municipal Fund
 
 
Portfolio of Investments (continued)
February 28, 2015
 
 
Principal
     
Optional Call
         
 
Amount (000)
 
Description (1)
 
Provisions (2)
Ratings (3)
   
Value
 
     
Tax Obligation/General – 38.8% (26.5% of Total Investments)
             
$
2,310
 
Ann Arbor Public School District, Washtenaw County, Michigan, General Obligation Bonds, Refunding Series 2012, 5.000%, 5/01/29
 
5/22 at 100.00
Aa2
 
$
2,717,091
 
 
2,200
 
Ann Arbor, Michigan, General Obligation Bonds, Court & Police Facilities Capital Improvement Series 2008, 5.000%, 5/01/38
 
5/18 at 100.00
AA+
   
2,426,270
 
 
100
 
Battle Creek School District, Calhoun County, Michigan, General Obligation Bonds, Series 2007, 5.000%, 5/01/37 – AGM Insured
 
5/17 at 100.00
AA
   
107,560
 
     
Byron Center Public Schools, Kent County, Michigan, General Obligation Bonds, Series 2012:
             
 
1,000
 
4.000%, 5/01/32
 
5/21 at 100.00
AA–
   
1,037,660
 
 
500
 
4.000%, 5/01/33
 
5/21 at 100.00
AA–
   
518,050
 
 
1,135
 
Caledonia Community Schools, Kent, Allegan and Barry Counties, Michigan, General Obligation Bonds, School Building & Site Series 2014, 5.000%, 5/01/39
 
5/24 at 100.00
AA–
   
1,298,258
 
 
7,740
 
Caledonia Community Schools, Kent, Allegan and Barry Counties, Michigan, General Obligation Bonds, Series 2007, 4.750%, 5/01/32 – NPFG Insured
 
5/17 at 100.00
Aa2
   
8,271,738
 
 
875
 
Charlotte Public School District, Easton County, Michigan, General Obligation Bonds, Refunding Series 2012, 5.000%, 5/01/20
 
No Opt. Call
AA–
   
1,017,371
 
     
Comstock Park Public Schools, Kent County, Michigan, General Obligation Bonds, School Building & Site, Series 2011B:
             
 
1,200
 
5.500%, 5/01/36
 
5/21 at 100.00
AA–
   
1,392,924
 
 
2,190
 
5.500%, 5/01/41
 
5/21 at 100.00
AA–
   
2,527,370
 
     
Detroit-Wayne County Stadium Authority, Michigan, Wayne County Limited Tax General Obligation Bonds, Building Authority Stadium Refunding Series 2012:
             
 
1,040
 
5.000%, 10/01/19 – AGM Insured
 
No Opt. Call
AA
   
1,151,197
 
 
2,615
 
5.000%, 10/01/20 – AGM Insured
 
No Opt. Call
AA
   
2,914,836
 
 
1,000
 
5.000%, 10/01/21 – AGM Insured
 
No Opt. Call
AA
   
1,118,990
 
 
1,645
 
5.000%, 10/01/22 – AGM Insured
 
No Opt. Call
AA
   
1,851,744
 
 
4,850
 
5.000%, 10/01/26 – AGM Insured
 
10/22 at 100.00
AA
   
5,279,856
 
     
Grand Rapids and Kent County Joint Building Authority, Michigan, Limited Tax General Obligation Bonds, Devos Place Project, Series 2001:
             
 
8,900
 
0.000%, 12/01/25
 
No Opt. Call
AAA
   
6,759,728
 
 
3,000
 
0.000%, 12/01/26
 
No Opt. Call
AAA
   
2,188,200
 
 
100
 
0.000%, 12/01/27
 
No Opt. Call
AAA
   
70,202
 
 
5,305
 
0.000%, 12/01/29
 
No Opt. Call
AAA
   
3,450,637
 
     
Grand Rapids, Michigan, General Obligation Bonds, Capital Improvement Series 2007:
             
 
860
 
5.000%, 9/01/24 – NPFG Insured
 
9/17 at 100.00
AA
   
945,630
 
 
2,000
 
5.000%, 9/01/27 – NPFG Insured
 
9/17 at 100.00
AA
   
2,176,200
 
 
3,185
 
Kalamazoo Public Schools, Michigan, General Obligation Bonds, Series 2006, 5.000%, 5/01/25 AGM Insured
 
5/16 at 100.00
AA
   
3,358,742
 
     
Lake Saint Claire, Macomb County, Michigan, Clean water Drainage District General Obligation Bonds, Series 2013:
             
 
1,000
 
5.000%, 10/01/25
 
10/23 at 100.00
AA+
   
1,183,970
 
 
1,020
 
5.000%, 10/01/26
 
10/23 at 100.00
AA+
   
1,196,287
 
 
2,505
 
Lincoln Consolidated School District, Washtenaw and Wayne Counties, Michigan, General Obligation Bonds, Series 2006, 5.000%, 5/01/25 – NPFG Insured
 
5/16 at 100.00
Aa2
   
2,628,196
 
 
2,160
 
Lowell Area Schools, Kent and Ionia Counties, Michigan, General Obligation Bonds, Series 2007, 5.000%, 5/01/37 – AGM Insured
 
5/17 at 100.00
AA
   
2,321,352
 
 
1,925
 
Marshall Public Schools, Calhoun County, Michigan, General Obligation Bonds, Series 2007, 5.000%, 5/01/30 – SYNCORA GTY Insured
 
5/17 at 100.00
AA–
   
2,009,642
 
 
4,000
 
Michigan State, General Obligation Bonds, Environmental Program, Refunding Series 2011A, 5.000%, 12/01/22
 
12/21 at 100.00
Aa2
   
4,794,360
 
 
1,000
 
Michigan State, General Obligation Bonds, Environmental Program, Series 2009A, 5.500%, 11/01/25
 
5/19 at 100.00
Aa2
   
1,147,080
 
 
2,500
 
Montrose School District, Michigan, School Building and Site Bonds, Series 1997, 6.000%, 5/01/22 – NPFG Insured
 
No Opt. Call
AA–
   
2,990,775
 
 
2,945
 
Muskegon Community College District, Michigan, General Obligation Bonds, Community Facility Series 2013I, 5.000%, 5/01/38 – BAM Insured
 
5/24 at 100.00
AA
   
3,424,623
 
 
34
 
Nuveen Investments

 
 

 
 
 
Principal
     
Optional Call
         
 
Amount (000)
 
Description (1)
 
Provisions (2)
Ratings (3)
   
Value
 
     
Tax Obligation/General (continued)
             
$
1,410
 
New Haven Community Schools, Macomb County, Michigan, General Obligation Bonds, Series 2006, 5.000%, 5/01/25 – AGM Insured
 
5/16 at 100.00
AA
 
$
1,483,250
 
 
6,820
 
Oakland Intermediate School District, Oakland County, Michigan, General Obligation Bonds, Series 2007, 5.000%, 5/01/36 – AGM Insured
 
5/17 at 100.00
Aaa
   
7,352,369
 
 
1,100
 
Oxford Area Community Schools, Oakland and Lapeer Counties, Michigan, General Obligation Bonds, Series 2004, 5.000%, 5/01/25 – AGM Insured
 
5/15 at 100.00
AA
   
1,108,503
 
 
5,785
 
Parchment School District, Kalamazoo County, Michigan, General Obligation Bonds, Series 2007, 4.750%, 5/01/36 – AGM Insured
 
5/17 at 100.00
AA
   
5,973,186
 
 
750
 
Plainwell Community Schools, Allegan County, Michigan, General Obligation Bonds, School Building & Site, Series 2008, 5.000%, 5/01/28 – AGC Insured
 
5/18 at 100.00
AA
   
827,715
 
     
Port Huron, Michigan, General Obligation Bonds, Refunding & Capital Improvement Series 2011:
             
 
1,585
 
5.000%, 10/01/31 – AGM Insured
 
10/21 at 100.00
AA
   
1,740,504
 
 
640
 
5.250%, 10/01/37 – AGM Insured
 
10/21 at 100.00
AA
   
708,205
 
     
Port Huron, Michigan, General Obligation Bonds, Series 2011B:
             
 
530
 
5.000%, 10/01/31 – AGM Insured
 
10/21 at 100.00
AA
   
581,998
 
 
800
 
5.250%, 10/01/40 – AGM Insured
 
10/21 at 100.00
AA
   
883,264
 
 
500
 
Rockford Public Schools, Kent County, Michigan, General Obligation Bonds, Refunding Series 2012, 5.000%, 5/01/19
 
No Opt. Call
AA–
   
573,525
 
 
1,000
 
Rockford Public Schools, Kent County, Michigan, General Obligation Bonds, Series 2005, 5.000%, 5/01/27 – AGM Insured
 
5/15 at 100.00
AA
   
1,007,930
 
 
2,100
 
Rockford Public Schools, Kent County, Michigan, General Obligation Bonds, Series 2008, 5.000%, 5/01/33 – AGM Insured
 
5/18 at 100.00
AA
   
2,305,044
 
 
625
 
Royal Oak City School District, Oakland County, Michigan, General Obligation Bonds, Refunding Series 2014, 5.000%, 5/01/20
 
No Opt. Call
Aa2
   
732,675
 
 
1,435
 
South Haven Public Schools, Van Buren County, Michigan, General Obligation Bonds, School Building & Site, Series 2014A, 5.000%, 5/01/41 – BAM Insured
 
5/24 at 100.00
AA
   
1,611,031
 
 
350
 
South Haven, Van Buren County, Michigan, General Obligation Bonds, Capital Improvement Series 2009, 5.125%, 12/01/33 – AGC Insured
 
12/19 at 100.00
AA
   
400,110
 
 
3,600
 
Trenton Public Schools District, Michigan, General Obligation Bonds, Series 2008, 5.000%, 5/01/34 – AGM Insured
 
5/18 at 100.00
AA
   
3,951,504
 
 
550
 
Troy School District, Oakland County, Michigan, General Obligation Bonds, Refunding Series 2015, 5.000%, 5/01/26 (WI/DD, Settling 3/25/15)
 
5/25 at 100.00
AA
   
669,746
 
     
Van Dyke Public Schools, Macomb County, Michigan, General Obligation Bonds, School Building & Site, Series 2008:
             
 
1,110
 
5.000%, 5/01/31 – AGM Insured
 
5/18 at 100.00
AA
   
1,219,102
 
 
2,150
 
5.000%, 5/01/38 – AGM Insured
 
5/18 at 100.00
AA
   
2,361,324
 
 
1,600
 
Walled Lake Consolidated School District, Oakland County, Michigan, General Obligation Bonds, School Building & Site Series 2014, 5.000%, 5/01/40
 
11/23 at 100.00
Aa2
   
1,819,248
 
     
Wayne Charter County, Michigan, Limited Tax General Obligation Airport Hotel Revenue Bonds, Detroit Metropolitan Wayne County Airport, Series 2001A:
             
 
1,500
 
5.500%, 12/01/18 – NPFG Insured
 
6/15 at 100.00
AA–
   
1,505,385
 
 
5,000
 
5.000%, 12/01/21 – NPFG Insured
 
6/15 at 100.00
AA–
   
5,015,900
 
 
6,125
 
5.000%, 12/01/30 – NPFG Insured
 
6/15 at 100.00
AA–
   
6,141,721
 
 
1,725
 
Williamston Community School District, Michigan, Unlimited Tax General Obligation QSBLF Bonds, Series 1996, 5.500%, 5/01/25 – NPFG Insured
 
No Opt. Call
AA–
   
2,028,686
 
 
1,475
 
Willow Run Community Schools, Washtenaw County, Michigan, General Obligation Bonds, Refunding Series 2011, 4.500%, 5/01/31 – AGM Insured
 
5/21 at 100.00
AA
   
1,599,726
 
 
123,070
 
Total Tax Obligation/General
         
127,878,190
 
 
Nuveen Investments
 
35

 
 

 

NUM
Nuveen Michigan Quality Income Municipal Fund
 
 
Portfolio of Investments (continued)
February 28, 2015
 
 
Principal
     
Optional Call
         
 
Amount (000)
 
Description (1)
 
Provisions (2)
Ratings (3)
   
Value
 
     
Tax Obligation/Limited – 16.4% (11.2% of Total Investments)
             
     
Grand Rapids Building Authority, Kent County, Michigan, General Obligation Bonds, Refunding Series 2011:
             
$
560
 
5.000%, 10/01/28
 
10/21 at 100.00
AA
 
$
630,823
 
 
500
 
5.000%, 10/01/30
 
10/21 at 100.00
AA
   
562,280
 
 
500
 
5.000%, 10/01/31
 
10/21 at 100.00
AA
   
561,960
 
 
1,000
 
Grand Rapids Building Authority, Kent County, Michigan, Limited Tax General Obligation Bonds, Series 1998, 5.000%, 4/01/16
 
No Opt. Call
AA
   
1,049,900
 
     
Michigan Finance Authority, Local Government Loan Program Revenue Bonds, Detroit Regional Convention Facility Authority Local Project, Series 2014H-1:
             
 
1,240
 
5.000%, 10/01/20
 
10/19 at 100.00
AA–
   
1,409,644
 
 
2,000
 
5.000%, 10/01/24
 
10/23 at 100.00
AA–
   
2,358,220
 
 
11,025
 
5.000%, 10/01/39
 
10/24 at 100.00
AA–
   
12,410,402
 
 
4,730
 
Michigan Finance Authority, Unemployment Obligation Assessment Revenue Bonds, Series 2012B, 5.000%, 7/01/22
 
7/16 at 100.00
AAA
   
5,029,031
 
     
Michigan State Building Authority, Revenue Bonds, Facilities Program, Series 2005II:
             
 
1,600
 
5.000%, 10/15/30 – AMBAC Insured
 
10/15 at 100.00
Aa3
   
1,643,392
 
 
2,135
 
5.000%, 10/15/33 – AMBAC Insured
 
10/15 at 100.00
Aa3
   
2,194,801
 
     
Michigan State Building Authority, Revenue Bonds, Refunding Series 2006IA:
             
 
7,000
 
0.000%, 10/15/27 – AGM Insured
 
10/16 at 58.27
AA
   
4,022,760
 
 
7,720
 
0.000%, 10/15/28 – AGM Insured
 
10/16 at 55.35
AA
   
4,084,112
 
 
1,500
 
0.000%, 10/15/30 – FGIC Insured
 
10/16 at 50.02
AA–
   
708,030
 
 
8,040
 
5.000%, 10/15/36 – FGIC Insured
 
10/16 at 100.00
AA–
   
8,524,973
 
     
Michigan State Trunk Line Fund Bonds, Series 2011:
             
 
1,100
 
5.000%, 11/15/24
 
11/21 at 100.00
AA+
   
1,297,802
 
 
1,750
 
5.000%, 11/15/29
 
11/21 at 100.00
AA+
   
2,032,398
 
 
1,605
 
5.000%, 11/15/31
 
11/21 at 100.00
AA+
   
1,845,943
 
 
1,160
 
4.000%, 11/15/32
 
11/21 at 100.00
AA+
   
1,217,791
 
 
1,970
 
5.000%, 11/15/36
 
11/21 at 100.00
AA+
   
2,231,931
 
 
57,135
 
Total Tax Obligation/Limited
         
53,816,193
 
     
Transportation – 3.8% (2.6% of Total Investments)
             
 
4,500
 
Wayne County Airport Authority, Michigan, Revenue Bonds, Detroit Metropolitan Airport, Refunding Series 2011A, 5.000%, 12/01/21 (Alternative Minimum Tax)
 
No Opt. Call
A
   
5,270,670
 
     
Wayne County Airport Authority, Michigan, Revenue Bonds, Detroit Metropolitan Wayne County Airport, Series 2012A:
             
 
2,345
 
5.000%, 12/01/23
 
No Opt. Call
A
   
2,754,343
 
 
4,000
 
5.000%, 12/01/42 – AGM Insured
 
12/22 at 100.00
AA
   
4,453,360
 
 
10,845
 
Total Transportation
         
12,478,373
 
     
U.S. Guaranteed – 17.2% (11.8% of Total Investments) (4)
             
     
Caledonia Community Schools, Kent, Allegan and Barry Counties, Michigan, General Obligation Bonds, Series 2005:
             
 
1,000
 
5.000%, 5/01/25 (Pre-refunded 5/01/15) – NPFG Insured
 
5/15 at 100.00
Aa2 (4)
   
1,008,720
 
 
2,250
 
5.000%, 5/01/26 (Pre-refunded 5/01/15) – NPFG Insured
 
5/15 at 100.00
Aa2 (4)
   
2,269,620
 
 
915
 
Detroit, Michigan, Second Lien Sewerage Disposal System Revenue Bonds, Series 2005A, 5.000%, 7/01/30 (Pre-refunded 7/01/15) – NPFG Insured
 
7/15 at 100.00
AA– (4)
   
930,262
 
 
1,330
 
Grand Rapids, Michigan, Sanitary Sewer System Revenue Bonds, Series 2005, 5.000%, 1/01/30 (Pre-refunded 7/01/15) – NPFG Insured
 
7/15 at 100.00
AA+ (4)
   
1,352,278
 
 
1,650
 
Holly Area School District, Oakland County, Michigan, General Obligation Bonds, Series 2006, 5.125%, 5/01/32 (Pre-refunded 5/01/16) – NPFG Insured
 
5/16 at 100.00
Aa2 (4)
   
1,744,644
 
 
230
 
Kent County, Michigan, Airport Revenue Bonds, Gerald R. Ford International Airport, Series 2007, 5.000%, 1/01/32 (Pre-refunded 1/01/17)
 
1/17 at 100.00
AAA
   
249,000
 
 
200
 
L’Anse Creuse Public Schools, Macomb County, Michigan, General Obligation Bonds, Series 2005, 5.000%, 5/01/35 (Pre-refunded 5/01/15) – AGM Insured
 
5/15 at 100.00
AA (4)
   
201,714
 
 
36
 
Nuveen Investments

 
 

 
 
 
Principal
     
Optional Call
         
 
Amount (000)
 
Description (1)
 
Provisions (2)
Ratings (3)
   
Value
 
     
U.S. Guaranteed (4) (continued)
             
$
830
 
Michigan Municipal Bond Authority, Clean Water Revolving Fund Revenue Bonds, Series 2005, 5.000%, 10/01/19 (Pre-refunded 10/01/15)
 
10/15 at 100.00
N/R (4)
 
$
854,062
 
 
4,000
 
Michigan State Hospital Finance Authority, Hospital Revenue Bonds, MidMichigan Obligated Group, Series 2009A, 5.875%, 6/01/39 (Pre-refunded 6/01/19) – AGC Insured
 
6/19 at 100.00
AA+ (4)
   
4,799,360
 
 
3,415
 
Michigan State Hospital Finance Authority, Hospital Revenue Refunding Bonds, St. John’s Health System, Series 1998A, 5.000%, 5/15/28 – AMBAC Insured (ETM)
 
5/15 at 100.00
Aaa
   
3,428,523
 
     
Michigan State Hospital Finance Authority, Revenue Bonds, Chelsea Community Hospital, Series 2005:
             
 
425
 
5.000%, 5/15/25 (Pre-refunded 5/15/15)
 
5/15 at 100.00
AA+ (4)
   
429,467
 
 
1,600
 
5.000%, 5/15/30 (Pre-refunded 5/15/15)
 
5/15 at 100.00
AA+ (4)
   
1,616,816
 
 
835
 
5.000%, 5/15/37 (Pre-refunded 5/15/15)
 
5/15 at 100.00
AA+ (4)
   
843,776
 
     
Michigan State Hospital Finance Authority, Revenue Bonds, Marquette General Hospital, Series 2005A:
             
 
4,435
 
5.000%, 5/15/26 (Pre-refunded 5/15/15)
 
5/15 at 100.00
N/R (4)
   
4,481,612
 
 
2,680
 
5.000%, 5/15/34 (Pre-refunded 5/15/15)
 
5/15 at 100.00
N/R (4)
   
2,708,167
 
 
1,595
 
Oakridge Public Schools, Muskegon County, Michigan, General Obligation Bonds, Series 2005, 5.000%, 5/01/22 (Pre-refunded 5/01/15) – NPFG Insured
 
5/15 at 100.00
AA– (4)
   
1,608,924
 
     
Ottawa County, Michigan, Water Supply System, General Obligation Bonds, Series 2007:
             
 
4,330
 
5.000%, 8/01/26 (Pre-refunded 8/01/17) – NPFG Insured (UB)
 
8/17 at 100.00
Aaa
   
4,755,163
 
 
5,620
 
5.000%, 8/01/30 (Pre-refunded 8/01/17) – NPFG Insured (UB)
 
8/17 at 100.00
Aaa
   
6,144,009
 
 
3,640
 
Royal Oak Hospital Finance Authority, Michigan, Hospital Revenue Bonds, William Beaumont Hospital Obligated Group, Refunding Series 2009W, 6.000%, 8/01/39 (Pre-refunded 8/01/19)
 
8/19 at 100.00
A1 (4)
   
4,410,442
 
 
1,500
 
Royal Oak Hospital Finance Authority, Michigan, Hospital Revenue Bonds, William Beaumont Hospital, Refunding Series 2009V, 8.250%, 9/01/39 (Pre-refunded 9/01/18)
 
9/18 at 100.00
Aaa
   
1,879,290
 
 
3,175
 
South Redford School District, Wayne County, Michigan, General Obligation Bonds, School Building and Site, Series 2005, 5.000%, 5/01/30 (Pre-refunded 5/01/15) – NPFG Insured
 
5/15 at 100.00
Aa2 (4)
   
3,202,686
 
 
1,655
 
Southfield Library Building Authority, Michigan, General Obligation Bonds, Series 2005, 5.000%, 5/01/26 (Pre-refunded 5/01/15) – NPFG Insured
 
5/15 at 100.00
AA (4)
   
1,669,399
 
 
1,930
 
Taylor Brownfield Redevelopment Authority, Wayne County, Michigan, Tax Increment Bonds, Series 2005A, 5.000%, 5/01/34 (Pre-refunded 5/01/15) – NPFG Insured
 
5/15 at 100.00
AA– (4)
   
1,946,733
 
 
1,535
 
Thornapple Kellogg School District, Barry County, Michigan, General Obligation Bonds, Series 2007, 5.000%, 5/01/32 (Pre-refunded 5/01/17) – NPFG Insured
 
5/17 at 100.00
Aa2 (4)
   
1,682,959
 
 
2,275
 
Troy City School District, Oakland County, Michigan, General Obligation Bonds, Series 2006, 5.000%, 5/01/19 (Pre-refunded 5/01/16) – NPFG Insured
 
5/16 at 100.00
Aa1 (4)
   
2,402,150
 
 
53,050
 
Total U.S. Guaranteed
         
56,619,776
 
     
Utilities – 11.9% (8.1% of Total Investments)
             
 
6,020
 
Holland, Michigan, Electric Utility System Revenue Bonds, Series 2014A, 5.000%, 7/01/39
 
No Opt. Call
AA
   
6,776,531
 
     
Lansing Board of Water and Light, Michigan, Steam and Electric Utility System Revenue Bonds, Series 2008A:
             
 
390
 
5.000%, 7/01/28
 
7/18 at 100.00
AA–
   
432,541
 
 
8,250
 
5.000%, 7/01/32
 
7/18 at 100.00
AA–
   
9,070,628
 
     
Lansing Board of Water and Light, Michigan, Utility System Revenue Bonds, Tender Option Bond Trust 4700:
             
 
1,700
 
18.446%, 7/01/37 (IF) (5)
 
7/21 at 100.00
AA–
   
2,523,072
 
 
1,110
 
18.446%, 7/01/37 (IF) (5)
 
7/21 at 100.00
AA–
   
1,647,418
 
     
Michigan Public Power Agency, AFEC Project Revenue Bonds, Series 2012A:
             
 
1,900
 
5.000%, 1/01/27
 
1/22 at 100.00
A2
   
2,117,968
 
 
4,530
 
5.000%, 1/01/43
 
1/22 at 100.00
A2
   
4,880,169
 
 
Nuveen Investments
 
37

 
 

 

NUM
Nuveen Michigan Quality Income Municipal Fund
 
 
Portfolio of Investments (continued)
February 28, 2015
 
 
Principal
     
Optional Call
         
 
Amount (000)
 
Description (1)
 
Provisions (2)
Ratings (3)
   
Value
 
     
Utilities (continued)
             
     
Michigan Public Power Agency, Revenue Bonds, Combustion Turbine 1 Project, Refunding Series 2011:
             
$
1,760
 
5.000%, 1/01/24 – AGM Insured
 
1/21 at 100.00
AA
 
$
2,010,149
 
 
1,990
 
5.000%, 1/01/25 – AGM Insured
 
1/21 at 100.00
AA
   
2,255,426
 
 
2,180
 
5.000%, 1/01/26 – AGM Insured
 
1/21 at 100.00
AA
   
2,453,110
 
 
290
 
5.000%, 1/01/27 – AGM Insured
 
1/21 at 100.00
AA
   
324,829
 
 
3,640
 
Michigan Strategic Fund, Limited Obligation Revenue Refunding Bonds, Detroit Edison Company, Series 1991BB, 7.000%, 5/01/21 – AMBAC Insured
 
No Opt. Call
Aa3
   
4,693,562
 
 
33,760
 
Total Utilities
         
39,185,403
 
     
Water and Sewer – 16.3% (11.2% of Total Investments)
             
     
Detroit, Michigan, Second Lien Sewerage Disposal System Revenue Bonds, Series 2005A:
             
 
1,085
 
5.000%, 7/01/30 – NPFG Insured
 
7/15 at 100.00
AA–
   
1,096,154
 
 
135
 
5.000%, 7/01/35 – NPFG Insured
 
7/15 at 100.00
AA–
   
135,923
 
 
425
 
Detroit, Michigan, Sewage Disposal System Revenue Bonds, Second Lien Series 2006A, 5.500%, 7/01/36 – BHAC Insured
 
7/18 at 100.00
AA+
   
464,648
 
 
305
 
Detroit, Michigan, Water Supply System Second Lien Revenue Bonds, Series 2003B, 5.000%, 7/01/34 – NPFG Insured
 
7/15 at 100.00
AA–
   
306,049
 
 
10,100
 
Detroit, Michigan, Water Supply System Second Lien Revenue Bonds, Series 2006A, 5.000%, 7/01/34 – AGM Insured
 
7/16 at 100.00
AA
   
10,377,346
 
 
190
 
Detroit, Michigan, Water Supply System Second Lien Revenue Refunding Bonds, Series 2006C, 5.000%, 7/01/33 – AGM Insured
 
No Opt. Call
AA
   
195,217
 
 
175
 
Detroit, Michigan, Water Supply System Senior Lien Revenue Bonds, Series 2003D. RMKTD, 5.000%, 7/01/33 – NPFG Insured
 
No Opt. Call
AA–
   
179,641
 
     
Grand Rapids, Michigan, Sanitary Sewer System Revenue Bonds, Improvement & Refunding Series 2014:
             
 
1,000
 
5.000%, 1/01/32
 
1/24 at 100.00
AA+
   
1,168,700
 
 
1,000
 
5.000%, 1/01/33
 
1/24 at 100.00
AA+
   
1,167,000
 
 
1,000
 
5.000%, 1/01/34
 
1/24 at 100.00
AA+
   
1,163,600
 
 
1,855
 
5.000%, 1/01/44
 
1/24 at 100.00
AA+
   
2,128,835
 
 
1,190
 
Grand Rapids, Michigan, Sanitary Sewer System Revenue Bonds, Series 2008, 5.000%, 1/01/38
 
1/18 at 100.00
AA+
   
1,301,348
 
 
2,605
 
Grand Rapids, Michigan, Water Supply System Revenue Bonds, Series 2009, 5.100%, 1/01/39 – AGC Insured
 
1/19 at 100.00
AA
   
2,908,456
 
     
Michigan Finance Authority, Local Government Loan Program Revenue Bonds, Detroit Water & Sewerage Department Water Supply System Local Project, Refunding Senior Loan Series 2014D-1:
             
 
1,500
 
5.000%, 7/01/35 – AGM Insured
 
7/24 at 100.00
AA
   
1,664,055
 
 
1,220
 
5.000%, 7/01/37 – AGM Insured
 
7/24 at 100.00
AA
   
1,348,344
 
     
Michigan Finance Authority, State Revolving Fund Revenue Bonds, Clean Water Series 2012:
             
 
2,000
 
5.000%, 10/01/31
 
10/22 at 100.00
AAA
   
2,327,320
 
 
1,135
 
5.000%, 10/01/32
 
10/22 at 100.00
AAA
   
1,317,360
 
     
Michigan Finance Authority, State Revolving Fund Revenue Bonds, Clean Water Subordinate Refunding Series 2013:
             
 
1,945
 
5.000%, 10/01/22
 
No Opt. Call
AAA
   
2,386,457
 
 
3,200
 
5.000%, 10/01/25
 
10/22 at 100.00
AAA
   
3,854,464
 
 
2,000
 
Michigan Finance Authority, State Revolving Fund Revenue Bonds, Clean Water, Refunding Series 2012, 5.000%, 10/01/20
 
No Opt. Call
AAA
   
2,386,980
 
 
580
 
Michigan Municipal Bond Authority, Clean Water Revolving Fund Revenue Bonds, Series 2004, 5.000%, 10/01/19
 
4/15 at 100.00
AAA
   
582,332
 
 
170
 
Michigan Municipal Bond Authority, Clean Water Revolving Fund Revenue Bonds, Series 2005, 5.000%, 10/01/19
 
10/15 at 100.00
AAA
   
174,847
 
 
38
 
Nuveen Investments

 
 

 
 
 
Principal
     
Optional Call
         
 
Amount (000)
 
Description (1)
 
Provisions (2)
Ratings (3)
   
Value
 
     
Water and Sewer (continued)
             
$
390
 
Michigan Municipal Bond Authority, Clean Water Revolving Fund Revenue Bonds, Series 2010, 5.000%, 10/01/26
 
No Opt. Call
AAA
 
$
459,880
 
 
90
 
Michigan Municipal Bond Authority, Drinking Water Revolving Fund Revenue Bonds, Series 2004, 5.000%, 10/01/23
 
4/15 at 100.00
AAA
   
90,358
 
     
Michigan Municipal Bond Authority, Water Revolving Fund Revenue Bonds, Series 2007:
             
 
500
 
5.000%, 10/01/23
 
10/17 at 100.00
AAA
   
554,535
 
 
2,000
 
5.000%, 10/01/24
 
10/17 at 100.00
AAA
   
2,219,220
 
 
8,245
 
North Kent Sewer Authority, Michigan, Sewer Revenue Bonds, Series 2006, 5.000%, 11/01/31 – NPFG Insured
 
11/16 at 100.00
AA
   
8,750,336
 
     
Port Huron, Michigan, Water Supply System Revenue Bonds, Series 2011:
             
 
500
 
5.250%, 10/01/31
 
10/21 at 100.00
A
   
549,875
 
 
1,500
 
5.625%, 10/01/40
 
10/21 at 100.00
A
   
1,709,880
 
 
700
 
Saginaw, Michigan, Water Supply System Revenue Bonds, Series 2008, 5.250%, 7/01/22 – NPFG Insured
 
7/18 at 100.00
AA–
   
775,047
 
 
48,740
 
Total Water and Sewer
         
53,744,207
 
$
454,730
 
Total Long-Term Investments (cost $447,565,543)
         
481,664,022
 
     
Floating Rate Obligations – (2.0)%
         
(6,625,000
)
     
Variable Rate MuniFund Term Preferred Shares, at Liquidation Value – (48.3)% (6)
         
(159,000,000
)
     
Other Assets Less Liabilities – 4.0% (7)
         
13,192,864
 
     
Net Assets Applicable to Common Shares – 100%
       
$
329,231,886
 
 
Nuveen Investments
 
39

 
 

 

NUM
Nuveen Michigan Quality Income Municipal Fund
 
 
Portfolio of Investments (continued)
February 28, 2015
 
Investments in Derivatives as of February 28, 2015
Credit Default Swaps outstanding:
 
       
 
 
Current
             
 
 
Unrealized
 
   
 
 
Buy/Sell
 
Credit
 
Notional
 
Fixed Rate
 
Termination
     
Appreciation
 
Counterparty
 
Referenced Entity
Protection (8
)
Spread (9
)
Amount
 
(Annualized
)
Date
 
Value
 
(Depreciation
)
Goldman Sachs
 
Commonwealth of Puerto Rico
 
Buy
   
26.5-29.0
%
$
2,250,000
   
5.000
%
 
9/20/19
 
$
613,828
 
$
106,483
 
Goldman Sachs
 
Commonwealth of Puerto Rico
 
Buy
  26.75-29.25
%
 
1,700,000
   
5.000
   
12/20/19
   
477,822
   
80,869
 
   
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
$
3,950,000
             
$
1,091,650
 
$
187,352
 
 
(1)
All percentages shown in the Portfolio of Investments are based on net assets applicable to common shares unless otherwise noted.
(2)
Optional Call Provisions (not covered by the report of independent registered public accounting firm): Dates (month and year) and prices of the earliest optional call or redemption. There may be other call provisions at varying prices at later dates. Certain mortgage-backed securities may be subject to periodic principal paydowns.
(3)
Ratings (not covered by the report of independent registered public accounting firm): Using the highest of Standard & Poor’s Group (“Standard & Poor’s”), Moody’s Investors Service, Inc. (“Moody’s”) or Fitch, Inc. (“Fitch”) rating. Ratings below BBB by Standard & Poor’s, Baa by Moody’s or BBB by Fitch are considered to be below investment grade. Holdings designated N/R are not rated by any of these national rating agencies.
(4)
Backed by an escrow or trust containing sufficient U.S. Government or U.S. Government agency securities, which ensure the timely payment of principal and interest. Certain bonds backed by U.S. Government or agency securities are regarded as having an implied rating equal to the rating of such securities.
(5)
Investment, or portion of investment, has been pledged to collateralize the net payment obligations for investments in derivatives and/or inverse floating rate transactions.
(6)
Variable Rate MuniFund Term Preferred Shares, at Liquidation Value as a percentage of Total Investments is 33.0%.
(7)
Other assets less liabilities includes the unrealized appreciation (depreciation) of certain over-the-counter derivatives as presented on the Statement of Assets and Liabilities. The unrealized appreciation (depreciation) of exchange-cleared and exchange-traded derivatives is recognized as part of the cash collateral at brokers and/or the receivable or payable for variation margin as presented on the Statement of Assets and Liabilities, when applicable.
(8)
The Fund entered into the credit default swap to gain investment exposure to the referenced entity. Selling protection has a similar credit risk position to owning that referenced entity. Buying protection has a similar credit risk position to selling the referenced entity short.
(9)
The credit spread generally serves as an indication of the current status of the payment/performance risk and therefore the likelihood of default of the credit derivative. The credit spread also reflects the cost of buying/selling protection and may include upfront payments required to be made to enter into a credit default swap contract. Higher credit spreads are indicative of a higher likelihood of performance by the seller of protection.
(ETM)
Escrowed to maturity.
(IF)
Inverse floating rate investment.
(UB)
Underlying bond of an inverse floating rate trust reflected as a financing transaction. See Notes to Financial Statements, Note 3 – Portfolio Securities and Investments in Derivatives, Inverse Floating Rate Securities for more information.
(WI/DD)
Investment, or portion of investment, purchased on a when-issued or delayed delivery basis.
 
See accompanying notes to financial statements.
 
40
 
Nuveen Investments

 
 

 

NUO
   
 
Nuveen Ohio Quality Income Municipal Fund
 
 
Portfolio of Investments
February 28, 2015
 
 
Principal
     
Optional Call
         
 
Amount (000)
 
Description (1)
 
Provisions (2)
Ratings (3)
   
Value
 
     
LONG-TERM INVESTMENTS – 144.5% (100.0% of Total Investments)
             
     
MUNICIPAL BONDS – 144.5% (100.0% of Total Investments)
             
     
Consumer Staples – 4.5% (3.1% of Total Investments)
             
$
400
 
Buckeye Tobacco Settlement Financing Authority, Ohio, Tobacco Settlement Asset-Backed Revenue Bonds, Senior Lien, Series 2007A-1, 5.000%, 6/01/16
 
No Opt. Call
Aa1
 
$
418,500
 
     
Buckeye Tobacco Settlement Financing Authority, Ohio, Tobacco Settlement Asset-Backed Revenue Bonds, Senior Lien, Series 2007A-2:
             
 
15,035
 
5.125%, 6/01/24
 
6/17 at 100.00
B–
   
12,919,724
 
 
1,085
 
5.875%, 6/01/47
 
6/17 at 100.00
B
   
902,080
 
 
16,520
 
Total Consumer Staples
         
14,240,304
 
     
Education and Civic Organizations – 8.2% (5.7% of Total Investments)
             
 
4,375
 
Miami University of Ohio, General Receipts Bonds, Refunding Series 2014, 5.000%, 9/01/33
 
9/24 at 100.00
AA
   
5,121,988
 
     
Miami University of Ohio, General Receipts Bonds, Series 2011:
             
 
130
 
5.000%, 9/01/33
 
No Opt. Call
AA
   
148,528
 
 
1,960
 
5.000%, 9/01/36
 
9/21 at 100.00
AA
   
2,206,940
 
     
Miami University of Ohio, General Receipts Bonds, Series 2012:
             
 
480
 
4.000%, 9/01/32
 
9/22 at 100.00
AA
   
506,443
 
 
1,000
 
4.000%, 9/01/33
 
9/22 at 100.00
AA
   
1,053,040
 
 
3,150
 
Ohio Higher Education Facilities Commission, General Revenue Bonds, Kenyon College, Series 2006, 5.000%, 7/01/41
 
7/16 at 100.00
A+
   
3,303,941
 
 
2,420
 
Ohio Higher Educational Facilities Commission, General Revenue Bonds, University of Dayton, 2006 Project, Series 2006, 5.000%, 12/01/30 – AMBAC Insured
 
12/16 at 100.00
A
   
2,580,107
 
     
Ohio Higher Educational Facilities Commission, Revenue Bonds, Denison University Project, Series 2012:
             
 
120
 
5.000%, 11/01/27
 
5/22 at 100.00
AA
   
140,382
 
 
590
 
5.000%, 11/01/32
 
5/22 at 100.00
AA
   
675,916
 
 
5,000
 
Ohio Higher Educational Facilities Commission, Revenue Bonds, University of Dayton, Series 2013, 5.000%, 12/01/43
 
12/22 at 100.00
A
   
5,599,350
 
 
2,250
 
Ohio State Higher Education Facilities, Revenue Bonds, Case Western Reserve University, Series 2006, 5.000%, 12/01/44 – NPFG Insured
 
12/16 at 100.00
AA–
   
2,398,860
 
 
950
 
Ohio State, Higher Educational Facility Revenue Bonds, Otterbein College Project, Series 2008A, 5.500%, 12/01/28
 
12/18 at 100.00
A3
   
1,066,556
 
 
1,000
 
Ohio University at Athens, General Receipts Bonds, Series 2013, 5.000%, 12/01/39
 
12/22 at 100.00
Aa3
   
1,128,650
 
 
23,425
 
Total Education and Civic Organizations
         
25,930,701
 
     
Health Care – 31.5% (21.8% of Total Investments)
             
 
3,000
 
Akron, Bath and Copley Joint Township Hospital District, Ohio, Hospital Revenue Bonds, Children’s Hospital Medical Center, Improvement Series 2013, 5.000%, 11/15/38
 
5/23 at 100.00
A1
   
3,299,640
 
 
1,950
 
Allen County, Ohio, Hospital Facilities Revenue Bonds, Catholic Healthcare Partners, Series 2010A, 5.250%, 6/01/38
 
6/20 at 100.00
AA–
   
2,215,844
 
 
3,500
 
Butler County, Ohio, Hospital Facilities Revenue Bonds, UC Health, Series 2010, 5.500%, 11/01/40
 
11/20 at 100.00
A–
   
4,018,490
 
 
6,575
 
Butler County, Ohio, Hospital Facilities Revenue Bonds, Cincinnati Children’s Medical Center Project, Series 2006K, 5.000%, 5/15/31 – FGIC Insured
 
5/16 at 100.00
A3
   
6,812,358
 
 
2,400
 
Fairfield County, Ohio, Hospital Facilities Revenue Bonds, Fairfield Medical Center Project, Series 2013, 5.000%, 6/15/43
 
6/23 at 100.00
Baa2
   
2,584,632
 
 
Nuveen Investments
 
41

 
 

 

NUO
Nuveen Ohio Quality Income Municipal Fund
 
 
Portfolio of Investments (continued)
February 28, 2015
 
 
Principal
     
Optional Call
         
 
Amount (000)
 
Description (1)
 
Provisions (2)
Ratings (3)
   
Value
 
     
Health Care (continued)
             
     
Franklin County, Ohio, Hospital Revenue Bonds, Nationwide Children’s Hospital Project, Improvement Series 2009:
             
$
250
 
5.000%, 11/01/34
 
11/19 at 100.00
Aa2
 
$
281,303
 
 
2,615
 
5.250%, 11/01/40
 
11/19 at 100.00
Aa2
   
2,965,122
 
 
2,470
 
Franklin County, Ohio, Hospital Revenue Bonds, Nationwide Children’s Hospital Project, Series 2008A, 5.000%, 11/01/40
 
11/18 at 100.00
Aa2
   
2,701,069
 
 
250
 
Franklin County, Ohio, Hospital Revenue Bonds, OhioHealth Corporation, Series 2011A, 5.000%, 11/15/41
 
11/21 at 100.00
AA+
   
281,010
 
 
4,480
 
Franklin County, Ohio, Hospital Revenue Bonds, OhioHealth Corporation, Tender Option Bond Trust 11-21B, 9.436%, 11/15/41 (IF) (4)
 
11/21 at 100.00
AA+
   
5,591,398
 
 
3,225
 
Hancock County, Ohio, Hospital Revenue Bonds, Blanchard Valley Regional Health Center, Series 2011A, 6.250%, 12/01/34
 
6/21 at 100.00
A2
   
3,866,936
 
 
1,865
 
Lake County, Ohio, Hospital Facilities Revenue Bonds, Lake Hospital System, Inc., Refunding Series 2008C, 6.000%, 8/15/43
 
8/18 at 100.00
A3
   
2,108,961
 
     
Lucas County, Ohio, Hospital Revenue Bonds, ProMedica Healthcare Obligated Group, Series 2008D:
             
 
90
 
5.000%, 11/15/38
 
11/18 at 100.00
AA
   
98,741
 
 
40
 
5.125%, 11/15/40
 
11/18 at 100.00
AA
   
43,957
 
 
3,965
 
Lucas County, Ohio, Hospital Revenue Bonds, ProMedica Healthcare Obligated Group, Series 2011A, 6.000%, 11/15/41
 
11/21 at 100.00
AA
   
4,807,047
 
 
1,500
 
Miami County, Ohio, Hospital Facilities Revenue Refunding Bonds, Upper Valley Medical Center Inc., Series 2006, 5.250%, 5/15/21
 
5/16 at 100.00
A
   
1,575,600
 
 
820
 
Middleburg Heights, Ohio, Hospital Facilities Revenue Bonds, Southwest General Health Center Project, Refunding Series 2011, 5.250%, 8/01/41
 
8/21 at 100.00
A2
   
890,389
 
     
Montgomery County, Ohio, Revenue Bonds, Catholic Health Initiatives, Series 2004A:
             
 
3,700
 
5.000%, 5/01/30
 
5/15 at 100.00
A+
   
3,711,322
 
 
2,500
 
5.000%, 5/01/32
 
5/15 at 100.00
A+
   
2,505,100
 
 
6,105
 
Muskingum County, Ohio, Hospital Facilities Revenue Bonds, Genesis HealthCare System Obligated Group Project, Series 2013, 5.000%, 2/15/44
 
2/23 at 100.00
BB+
   
6,328,077
 
 
95
 
Ohio Higher Educational Facilities Commission, Revenue Bonds, University Hospitals Health System Inc., Series 2007A, 5.250%, 1/15/46 – BHAC Insured
 
1/17 at 100.00
AA+
   
101,802
 
     
Ohio State Higher Educational Facilities Commission, Hospital Revenue Bonds, Cleveland Clinic Health System Obligated Group, Series 2008A:
             
 
3,000
 
5.000%, 1/01/25
 
1/18 at 100.00
Aa2
   
3,290,370
 
 
240
 
5.250%, 1/01/33
 
1/18 at 100.00
Aa2
   
263,203
 
 
1,100
 
Ohio State Higher Educational Facilities Commission, Hospital Revenue Bonds, Cleveland Clinic Health System Obligated Group, Series 2012A, 5.000%, 1/01/38
 
1/22 at 100.00
Aa2
   
1,233,727
 
     
Ohio State Higher Educational Facilities Commission, Hospital Revenue Bonds, Summa Health System Project, Series 2010:
             
 
1,500
 
5.750%, 11/15/40 – AGM Insured
 
5/20 at 100.00
AA
   
1,731,420
 
 
1,520
 
5.250%, 11/15/40 – AGM Insured
 
5/20 at 100.00
AA
   
1,707,355
 
 
8,050
 
Ohio State, Hospital Facility Revenue Bonds, Cleveland Clinic Health System Obligated Group, Refunding Series 2009A, 5.500%, 1/01/39
 
1/19 at 100.00
Aa2
   
9,103,343
 
     
Ohio State, Hospital Facility Revenue Refunding Bonds, Cleveland Clinic Health System Obligated Group, Tender Option Bond Trust 3551:
             
 
875
 
20.338%, 1/01/17 (IF)
 
No Opt. Call
Aa2
   
1,212,995
 
 
5,350
 
20.455%, 1/01/33 (IF)
 
1/19 at 100.00
Aa2
   
8,150,190
 
     
Ohio State, Hospital Revenue Bonds, University Hospitals Health System, Inc., Series 2013A:
             
 
1,000
 
5.000%, 1/15/28
 
1/23 at 100.00
A
   
1,138,320
 
 
2,000
 
5.000%, 1/15/29
 
1/23 at 100.00
A
   
2,272,140
 
 
42
 
Nuveen Investments

 
 

 
 
 
Principal
     
Optional Call
         
 
Amount (000)
 
Description (1)
 
Provisions (2)
Ratings (3)
   
Value
 
     
Health Care (continued)
             
     
Ross County, Ohio, Hospital Revenue Refunding Bonds, Adena Health System Series 2008:
             
$
1,425
 
5.750%, 12/01/28
 
12/18 at 100.00
A–
 
$
1,628,205
 
 
1,385
 
5.750%, 12/01/35
 
12/18 at 100.00
A–
   
1,573,845
 
 
1,000
 
5.750%, 12/01/35 – AGC Insured
 
12/18 at 100.00
AA
   
1,136,350
 
     
Wood County, Ohio, Hospital Facilities Refunding and Improvement Revenue Bonds, Wood County Hospital Project, Series 2012:
             
 
2,635
 
5.000%, 12/01/37
 
No Opt. Call
Baa2
   
2,770,544
 
 
4,920
 
5.000%, 12/01/42
 
No Opt. Call
Baa2
   
5,146,566
 
 
87,395
 
Total Health Care
         
99,147,371
 
     
Housing/Multifamily – 2.7% (1.9% of Total Investments)
             
 
1,325
 
Clermont County, Ohio, GNMA Collateralized Mortgage Revenue Bonds, S.E.M. Villa II Project, Series 1994A, 5.950%, 2/20/30
 
8/15 at 100.00
N/R
   
1,327,637
 
 
670
 
Franklin County, Ohio, GNMA Collateralized Multifamily Housing Mortgage Revenue Bonds, Agler Project, Series 2002A, 5.550%, 5/20/22 (Alternative Minimum Tax)
 
5/15 at 100.00
Aaa
   
671,427
 
 
1,600
 
Montgomery County, Ohio, GNMA Guaranteed Multifamily Housing Revenue Bonds, Canterbury Court Project, Series 2007, 5.500%, 10/20/42 (Alternative Minimum Tax)
 
10/18 at 101.00
Aa1
   
1,699,712
 
 
1,180
 
Ohio Housing Finance Agency, FHA-Insured Multifamily Housing Mortgage Revenue Bonds, Madonna Homes, Series 2006M, 4.900%, 6/20/48 (Alternative Minimum Tax)
 
6/16 at 102.00
A1
   
1,205,913
 
 
3,390
 
Summit County Port Authority, Ohio, Multifamily Housing Revenue Bonds, Callis Tower Apartments Project, Series 2007, 5.250%, 9/20/47 (Alternative Minimum Tax)
 
9/17 at 102.00
Aa1
   
3,551,195
 
 
8,165
 
Total Housing/Multifamily
         
8,455,884
 
     
Industrials – 2.3% (1.6% of Total Investments)
             
 
2,055
 
Cleveland-Cuyahoga County Port Authority, Ohio, Common Bond Fund Revenue Bonds, Cleveland Christian Home Project, Series 2002C, 5.950%, 5/15/22
 
5/15 at 100.00
BBB+
   
2,063,302
 
 
680
 
Cleveland-Cuyahoga County Port Authority, Ohio, Development Revenue Bonds, Bond Fund Program – Columbia National Group Project, Series 2005D, 5.000%, 5/15/20 (Alternative Minimum Tax)
 
11/15 at 100.00
BBB+
   
694,695
 
 
3,495
 
Toledo-Lucas County Port Authority, Ohio, Revenue Refunding Bonds, CSX Transportation Inc., Series 1992, 6.450%, 12/15/21
 
No Opt. Call
Baa1
   
4,426,697
 
 
1,600
 
Western Reserve Port Authority, Ohio, Solid Waste Facility Revenue Bonds, Central Waste Inc., Series 2007A, 6.350%, 7/01/27 (Alternative Minimum Tax) (5)
 
7/17 at 102.00
N/R
   
52,496
 
 
7,830
 
Total Industrials
         
7,237,190
 
     
Long-Term Care – 1.1% (0.8% of Total Investments)
             
 
895
 
Franklin County, Ohio, Healthcare Facilities Revenue Bonds, Ohio Presbyterian Retirement Services, Improvement Series 2010A, 5.625%, 7/01/26
 
7/21 at 100.00
BBB–
   
975,094
 
 
2,220
 
Montgomery County, Ohio, Health Care and Multifamily Housing Revenue Bonds, Saint Leonard, Refunding & improvement Series 2010, 6.625%, 4/01/40
 
4/20 at 100.00
BBB–
   
2,457,784
 
 
3,115
 
Total Long-Term Care
         
3,432,878
 
     
Materials – 0.7% (0.4% of Total Investments)
             
 
2,000
 
Toledo-Lucas County Port Authority, Ohio, Port Revenue Bonds, Cargill Inc., Series 2004B, 4.500%, 12/01/15
 
No Opt. Call
A
   
2,054,220
 
     
Tax Obligation/General – 29.6% (20.5% of Total Investments)
             
     
Central Ohio Solid Waste Authority, General Obligation Bonds, Refunding & Improvements, Series 2012:
             
 
1,140
 
5.000%, 12/01/26
 
6/22 at 100.00
Aaa
   
1,345,052
 
 
2,545
 
5.000%, 12/01/28
 
6/22 at 100.00
Aaa
   
2,960,395
 
 
1,605
 
5.000%, 12/01/29
 
6/22 at 100.00
Aaa
   
1,861,784
 
     
Cincinnati, Ohio, General Obligation Bonds, Various Purpose Series 2012A:
             
 
1,960
 
5.000%, 12/01/31
 
12/20 at 100.00
Aa2
   
2,264,525
 
 
875
 
5.000%, 12/01/32
 
12/20 at 100.00
Aa2
   
1,010,949
 
 
Nuveen Investments
 
43

 
 

 

NUO
Nuveen Ohio Quality Income Municipal Fund
 
 
Portfolio of Investments (continued)
February 28, 2015
 
 
Principal
     
Optional Call
         
 
Amount (000)
 
Description (1)
 
Provisions (2)
Ratings (3)
   
Value
 
     
Tax Obligation/General (continued)
             
$
2,000
 
Cleveland, Ohio, General Obligation Bonds, Series 2011, 5.000%, 12/01/29
 
12/19 at 100.00
AA
 
$
2,285,620
 
 
1,140
 
Columbia Local School District, Lorain County, Ohio, General Obligation Bonds, School Facilities Improvement Series 2011, 5.000%, 11/01/39 – AGM Insured
 
11/21 at 100.00
A2
   
1,291,004
 
     
Columbus City School District, Franklin County, Ohio, General Obligation Bonds, Series 2006:
             
 
4,310
 
0.000%, 12/01/27 – AGM Insured
 
No Opt. Call
AA+
   
2,961,703
 
 
5,835
 
0.000%, 12/01/28 – AGM Insured
 
No Opt. Call
AA+
   
3,870,647
 
 
1,730
 
Franklin County, Ohio, General Obligation Bonds, Refunding Series 2014, 5.000%, 6/01/31
 
12/23 at 100.00
AAA
   
2,065,326
 
     
Franklin County, Ohio, General Obligation Bonds, Various Purpose Series 2007:
             
 
3,355
 
5.000%, 12/01/27
 
12/17 at 100.00
AAA
   
3,705,967
 
 
1,840
 
5.000%, 12/01/28
 
12/17 at 100.00
AAA
   
2,028,361
 
     
Gallia County Local School District, Gallia and Jackson Counties, Ohio, General Obligation Bonds, Refunding School Improvement Series 2014:
             
 
1,260
 
5.000%, 11/01/30
 
11/24 at 100.00
Aa2
   
1,487,669
 
 
1,540
 
5.000%, 11/01/31
 
11/24 at 100.00
Aa2
   
1,812,549
 
     
Greenville City School District, Drake County, Ohio, General Obligation Bonds, School Improvement Series 2013:
             
 
555
 
5.250%, 1/01/38
 
1/22 at 100.00
AA
   
627,694
 
 
1,355
 
5.250%, 1/01/41
 
1/22 at 100.00
AA
   
1,528,914
 
 
1,355
 
Grove City, Ohio, General Obligation Bonds, Construction & Improvement Series 2009, 5.125%, 12/01/36
 
12/19 at 100.00
Aa1
   
1,552,979
 
 
12,750
 
Hamilton City School District, Ohio, General Obligation Bonds, Series 2007, 5.000%, 12/01/34 – AGM Insured
 
6/17 at 100.00
AA
   
13,735,318
 
 
6,580
 
Indian Lake Local School District, Logan and Auglaize Counties, Ohio, School Facilities Improvement and Refunding Bonds, Series 2007, 5.000%, 12/01/34 – NPFG Insured
 
6/17 at 100.00
AA–
   
7,097,649
 
 
2,160
 
Kenston Local School District, Geauga County, Ohio, General Obligation Bonds, Series 2011, 0.000%, 12/01/21
 
No Opt. Call
Aa1
   
1,907,237
 
 
2,620
 
Lucas County, Ohio, General Obligation Bonds, Various Purpose Series 2010, 5.000%, 10/01/40
 
10/18 at 100.00
AA
   
2,916,558
 
 
1,130
 
Marysville Exempted Village School District, Union County, Ohio, General Obligation Bonds, Series 2006, 5.000%, 12/01/25 – AGM Insured
 
12/15 at 100.00
AA
   
1,170,511
 
 
4,500
 
Middletown City School District, Butler County, Ohio, General Obligation Bonds, Refunding Series 2007, 5.250%, 12/01/31 – AGM Insured
 
No Opt. Call
A2
   
5,609,293
 
 
1,500
 
Milford Exempted Village School District, Ohio, General Obligation Bonds, Series 2008, 5.250%, 12/01/36
 
12/18 at 100.00
Aa3
   
1,682,145
 
 
1,305
 
Monroe Local School District, Butler County, Ohio, General Obligation Bonds, Series 2006, 5.500%, 12/01/24 – AMBAC Insured
 
No Opt. Call
Baa1
   
1,581,582
 
 
725
 
Napoleon City School District, Henry County, Ohio, General Obligation Bonds, Facilities Construction & Improvement Series 2012, 5.000%, 12/01/36
 
6/22 at 100.00
Aa3
   
810,913
 
 
2,500
 
New Albany Plain Local School District, Franklin County, Ohio, General Obligation Bonds, Refunding School Improvement Series 2013, 4.000%, 12/01/43
 
12/22 at 100.00
AA+
   
2,567,075
 
 
985
 
Newark City School District, Licking County, Ohio, General Obligation Bonds, Series 2005, 5.000%, 12/01/28 – NPFG Insured
 
12/15 at 100.00
AA–
   
1,016,047
 
 
2,300
 
Northmor Local School District, Morrow County, Ohio, General Obligation School Facilities Construction and Improvement Bonds, Series 2008, 5.000%, 11/01/36
 
11/18 at 100.00
Aa2
   
2,559,992
 
 
500
 
Oak Hills Local School District, Hamilton County, Ohio, General Obligation Bonds, Refunding Series 2005, 5.000%, 12/01/24 – AGM Insured
 
12/15 at 100.00
AA
   
517,675
 
 
1,000
 
Ohio State, General Obligation Bonds, Highway Capital Improvement Series 2012Q, 5.000%, 5/01/28
 
5/22 at 100.00
AAA
   
1,170,470
 
 
3,000
 
Ohio State, General Obligation Bonds, Highway Capital Improvement, Series 2014R, 5.000%, 5/01/29
 
5/24 at 100.00
AAA
   
3,600,690
 
 
44
 
Nuveen Investments

 
 

 
 
 
Principal
     
Optional Call
         
 
Amount (000)
 
Description (1)
 
Provisions (2)
Ratings (3)
   
Value
 
     
Tax Obligation/General (continued)
             
$
5,000
 
South Euclid, Ohio, General Obligation Bonds, Real Estate Acquisition and Urban Redevelopment, Series 2012, 5.000%, 6/01/42
 
6/22 at 100.00
Aa2
 
$
5,520,800
 
 
2,250
 
South-Western City School District, Franklin and Pickaway Counties, Ohio, General Obligation Bonds, School Facilities Construction & Improvement Series 2012, 5.000%, 12/01/36
 
6/22 at 100.00
AA
   
2,557,283
 
 
1,500
 
Springboro Community City School District, Warren County, Ohio, General Obligation Bonds, Refunding Series 2007, 5.250%, 12/01/32
 
No Opt. Call
AA
   
1,899,990
 
 
70
 
Strongsville, Ohio, Limited Tax General Obligation Various Purpose Improvement Bonds, Series 1996, 5.950%, 12/01/21
 
6/15 at 100.00
Aaa
   
70,338
 
 
700
 
Sylvania City School District, Lucas County, Ohio, General Obligation Bonds, School Improvement Series 1995, 5.250%, 12/01/36 – AGC Insured
 
6/17 at 100.00
AA
   
757,967
 
 
87,475
 
Total Tax Obligation/General
         
93,410,671
 
     
Tax Obligation/Limited – 29.4% (20.4% of Total Investments)
             
     
Cleveland, Ohio, Income Tax Revenue Bonds, Bridges & Roadways Improvements, Subordinate Lien Series 2013A-2:
             
 
1,315
 
5.000%, 10/01/27
 
10/23 at 100.00
AA
   
1,527,504
 
 
1,520
 
5.000%, 10/01/30
 
10/23 at 100.00
AA
   
1,747,514
 
 
1,600
 
5.000%, 10/01/31
 
10/23 at 100.00
AA
   
1,832,976
 
 
3,000
 
Cleveland, Ohio, Income Tax Revenue Bonds, Public Facilities Improvements, Series 2014A-1, 5.000%, 11/15/38
 
11/23 at 100.00
AA
   
3,427,410
 
 
500
 
Columbus-Franklin County Finance Authority, Ohio, Development Revenue Bonds, Hubbard Avenue Parking Facility Project, Series 2012A, 5.000%, 12/01/36
 
12/19 at 100.00
BBB
   
508,645
 
 
6,750
 
Cuyahoga County, Ohio, Recovery Zone Facility Economic Development Revenue Bonds, Medical Mart- Convention Center Project, Series 2010F, 5.000%, 12/01/27
 
12/20 at 100.00
Aa2
   
7,796,453
 
     
Cuyahoga County, Ohio, Sales Tax Revenue Bonds, Various Purpose Series 2014:
             
 
1,815
 
5.000%, 12/01/32
 
12/24 at 100.00
AAA
   
2,153,897
 
 
1,415
 
5.000%, 12/01/33
 
12/24 at 100.00
AAA
   
1,675,233
 
 
1,000
 
5.000%, 12/01/34
 
12/24 at 100.00
AAA
   
1,179,230
 
 
945
 
5.000%, 12/01/35
 
12/24 at 100.00
AAA
   
1,111,736
 
 
300
 
Delaware County District Library, Ohio, Library Fund Library Facilities Special Obligation Notes, Series 2009, 5.000%, 12/01/34
 
12/19 at 100.00
Aa2
   
330,480
 
 
5,000
 
Franklin County Convention Facilities Authority, Ohio, Excise Tax and Lease Revenue Anticipation Bonds, Series 2005, 5.000%, 12/01/27 – AMBAC Insured
 
12/15 at 100.00
Aaa
   
5,170,750
 
 
10,350
 
Franklin County Convention Facilities Authority, Ohio, Tax and Lease Revenue Anticipation and Refunding Bonds, Columbus City & Franklin County Lessees, Series 2014, 5.000%, 12/01/35
 
12/24 at 100.00
Aaa
   
11,910,159
 
     
Greater Cleveland Regional Transit Authority, Ohio, Sales Tax Supported Capital Improvement Bonds, Refunding Series 2012:
             
 
1,010
 
5.250%, 12/01/27
 
12/21 at 100.00
AAA
   
1,215,575
 
 
1,090
 
5.250%, 12/01/28
 
12/21 at 100.00
AAA
   
1,303,422
 
 
760
 
5.250%, 12/01/30
 
12/21 at 100.00
AAA
   
903,283
 
 
600
 
5.000%, 12/01/31
 
12/21 at 100.00
AAA
   
698,838
 
 
7,250
 
Hamilton County, Ohio, Sales Tax Bonds, Subordinate Lien, Series 2006A, 5.000%, 12/01/32 – AMBAC Insured
 
12/16 at 100.00
A+
   
7,729,660
 
 
5,565
 
Hamilton County, Ohio, Sales Tax Bonds, Subordinate Series 2000B, 0.000%, 12/01/28 – AGM Insured
 
No Opt. Call
AA
   
3,468,609
 
 
5,000
 
Hamilton County, Ohio, Sales Tax Revenue Bonds, Refunding Series 2011A, 5.000%, 12/01/31
 
12/21 at 100.00
A+
   
5,620,650
 
 
1,750
 
Hudson City School District, Ohio, Certificates of Participation, Series 2012, 4.000%, 6/01/34 – NPFG Insured
 
6/22 at 100.00
Aa3
   
1,806,963
 
 
20,700
 
JobsOhio Beverage System, Ohio, Statewide Liquor Profits Revenue Bonds, Senior Lien Series 2013A, 5.000%, 1/01/38
 
1/23 at 100.00
AA
   
23,281,286
 
 
Nuveen Investments
 
45

 
 

 

NUO
Nuveen Ohio Quality Income Municipal Fund
 
 
Portfolio of Investments (continued)
February 28, 2015
 
 
Principal
     
Optional Call
         
 
Amount (000)
 
Description (1)
 
Provisions (2)
Ratings (3)
   
Value
 
     
Tax Obligation/Limited (continued)
             
$
1,000
 
New Albany Community Authority, Ohio, Community Facilities Revenue Refunding Bonds, Series 2012C, 5.000%, 10/01/24
 
10/22 at 100.00
A1
 
$
1,153,420
 
     
Riversouth Authority, Ohio, Riversouth Area Redevelopment Bonds, Refunding Series 2012A:
             
 
1,645
 
5.000%, 12/01/23
 
12/22 at 100.00
AA+
   
1,961,334
 
 
1,200
 
5.000%, 12/01/24
 
12/22 at 100.00
AA+
   
1,421,316
 
     
Vermilion Local School District, East and Lorain Counties, Ohio, Certificates of Participation, Series 2012:
             
 
765
 
5.000%, 12/01/24
 
No Opt. Call
Aa3
   
870,731
 
 
805
 
5.000%, 12/01/25
 
12/20 at 100.00
Aa3
   
908,555
 
 
84,650
 
Total Tax Obligation/Limited
         
92,715,629
 
     
Transportation – 5.3% (3.6% of Total Investments)
             
     
Cleveland, Ohio, Airport System Revenue Bonds, Series 2012A:
             
 
2,150
 
5.000%, 1/01/30
 
1/22 at 100.00
A–
   
2,369,429
 
 
1,500
 
5.000%, 1/01/31 – AGM Insured
 
1/22 at 100.00
AA
   
1,665,690
 
 
3,550
 
Ohio Turnpike Commission, Revenue Refunding Bonds, Series 1998A, 5.500%, 2/15/18 – FGIC Insured
 
No Opt. Call
AA
   
4,034,007
 
 
2,050
 
Ohio Turnpike Commission, Turnpike Revenue Bonds, Infrastructure Project, Junior Lien Series 2013A-1, 5.250%, 2/15/39
 
2/23 at 100.00
A+
   
2,365,249
 
     
Ohio Turnpike Commission, Turnpike Revenue Bonds, Infrastructure Projects, Junior Lien Series 2013A-2:
             
 
11,250
 
0.000%, 2/15/38
 
No Opt. Call
A+
   
4,434,300
 
 
5,000
 
0.000%, 2/15/40
 
No Opt. Call
A+
   
1,751,900
 
 
25,500
 
Total Transportation
         
16,620,575
 
     
U.S. Guaranteed – 13.5% (9.3% of Total Investments) (6)
             
 
4,705
 
American Municipal Power Ohio Inc., Prairie State Energy Campus Project Revenue Bonds, Series 2008A, 5.250%, 2/15/43 (Pre-refunded 2/15/18)
 
2/18 at 100.00
N/R (6)
   
5,325,401
 
 
125
 
Barberton City School District, Summit County, Ohio, General Obligation Bonds, School Improvement Series 2008, 5.250%, 12/01/31 (Pre-refunded 6/01/18)
 
6/18 at 100.00
AA (6)
   
142,868
 
 
3,000
 
Centerville City School District, Montgomery County, Ohio, General Obligation Bonds, Series 2005, 5.000%, 12/01/30 (Pre-refunded 6/01/15) – AGM Insured
 
6/15 at 100.00
Aa1 (6)
   
3,038,130
 
     
Central Ohio Solid Waste Authority, General Obligation Bonds, Refunding & Improvements, Series 2012:
             
 
110
 
5.000%, 12/01/26 (Pre-refunded 6/01/22)
 
6/22 at 100.00
N/R (6)
   
135,076
 
 
245
 
5.000%, 12/01/28 (Pre-refunded 6/01/22)
 
6/22 at 100.00
N/R (6)
   
300,850
 
 
160
 
5.000%, 12/01/29 (Pre-refunded 6/01/22)
 
6/22 at 100.00
N/R (6)
   
196,474
 
     
Cincinnati City School District, Ohio, Certificates of Participation, School Improvement Project, Series 2006:
             
 
95
 
5.000%, 12/15/32 (Pre-refunded 12/15/16) – AGM Insured
 
12/16 at 100.00
AA (6)
   
102,823
 
 
30
 
5.000%, 12/15/32 (Pre-refunded 12/15/16) – AGM Insured
 
12/16 at 100.00
AA (6)
   
32,459
 
 
1,165
 
Cleveland-Cuyahoga County Port Authority, Ohio, Student Housing Facility Revenue Bonds, Euclid Avenue Housing Corporation – Fenn Tower Project, Series 2005, 5.000%, 8/01/23 (Pre-refunded 8/01/15) – AMBAC Insured
 
8/15 at 100.00
N/R (6)
   
1,188,335
 
 
1,195
 
Fairview Park City School District, Cuyahoga County, Ohio, General Obligation Bonds, Series 2005, 5.000%, 12/01/24 (Pre-refunded 6/01/15) – NPFG Insured
 
6/15 at 100.00
Aa2 (6)
   
1,210,284
 
 
2,620
 
Green, Ohio, General Obligation Bonds, Series 2008, 5.500%, 12/01/32 (Pre-refunded 12/01/15)
 
12/15 at 100.00
AA+ (6)
   
2,725,953
 
 
1,850
 
Hilliard City School District, Franklin County, Ohio, General Obligation Bonds, School Construction, Series 2005, 5.000%, 12/01/26 (Pre-refunded 12/01/15) – NPFG Insured
 
12/15 at 100.00
Aa1 (6)
   
1,918,358
 
 
3,000
 
Hilliard City School District, Franklin County, Ohio, General Obligation Bonds, Series 2006A, 5.000%, 12/01/25 (Pre-refunded 12/01/16) – NPFG Insured
 
12/16 at 100.00
Aa1 (6)
   
3,242,280
 
 
46
 
Nuveen Investments

 
 

 
 
 
Principal
     
Optional Call
         
 
Amount (000)
 
Description (1)
 
Provisions (2)
Ratings (3)
   
Value
 
     
U.S. Guaranteed (6) (continued)
             
     
Lakewood City School District, Cuyahoga County, Ohio, General Obligation Bonds, Series 2007:
             
$
1,010
 
5.000%, 12/01/25 (Pre-refunded 12/01/17) – FGIC Insured
 
12/17 at 100.00
Aa2 (6)
 
$
1,130,311
 
 
775
 
5.000%, 12/01/30 (Pre-refunded 12/01/17) – FGIC Insured
 
12/17 at 100.00
Aa2 (6)
   
867,318
 
 
1,000
 
Marysville Exempted Village School District, Ohio, Certificates of Participation, School Facilities Project, Series 2005, 5.250%, 12/01/21 (Pre-refunded 6/01/15) – NPFG Insured
 
6/15 at 100.00
N/R (6)
   
1,013,410
 
 
1,885
 
Marysville Exempted Village School District, Union County, Ohio, General Obligation Bonds, Series 2006, 5.000%, 12/01/25 (Pre-refunded 12/01/15) – AGM Insured
 
12/15 at 100.00
AA (6)
   
1,954,802
 
 
1,000
 
Mason City School District, Warren and Butler Counties, Ohio, General Obligation Bonds, Series 2007, 5.000%, 12/01/31 (Pre-refunded 6/01/17)
 
6/17 at 100.00
Aa1 (6)
   
1,099,890
 
 
2,680
 
Newark City School District, Licking County, Ohio, General Obligation Bonds, Series 2005, 5.000%, 12/01/28 (Pre-refunded 12/01/15) – NPFG Insured
 
12/15 at 100.00
AA– (6)
   
2,779,240
 
 
1,595
 
Ohio State Building Authority, State Facilities Bonds, Administrative Building Fund Projects, Series 2005A, 5.000%, 4/01/25 (Pre-refunded 4/01/15) – AGM Insured
 
4/15 at 100.00
AA (6)
   
1,602,385
 
 
2,000
 
Ohio State Building Authority, State Facilities Bonds, Adult Correctional Building Fund Project, Series 2005A, 5.000%, 4/01/23 (Pre-refunded 4/01/15) – AGM Insured
 
4/15 at 100.00
AA (6)
   
2,009,260
 
 
3,000
 
Ohio State Higher Educational Facility Commission, Higher Education Facility Revenue Bonds, Xavier University 2008C, 5.750%, 5/01/28 (Pre-refunded 11/01/18)
 
11/18 at 100.00
A– (6)
   
3,452,700
 
 
1,220
 
Ohio Water Development Authority, Revenue Bonds, Drinking Water Assistance Fund, State Match, Series 2008, 5.000%, 6/01/28 (Pre-refunded 6/01/18) – AGM Insured
 
6/18 at 100.00
AAA
   
1,383,748
 
     
Ohio Water Development Authority, Water Pollution Control Loan Fund Revenue Bonds, Water Quality Project, Series 2005B:
             
 
1,225
 
5.000%, 6/01/25 (Pre-refunded 6/01/15)
 
6/15 at 100.00
AAA
   
1,240,692
 
 
275
 
5.000%, 6/01/25 (Pre-refunded 6/01/15)
 
6/15 at 100.00
AAA
   
278,523
 
 
500
 
Olentangy Local School District, Delaware and Franklin Counties, Ohio, General Obligation Bonds, Series 2008, 5.000%, 12/01/36 (Pre-refunded 6/01/18)
 
6/18 at 100.00
AA+ (6)
   
567,110
 
 
2,300
 
Richland County, Ohio, Hospital Revenue Bonds, MidCentral Health System Group, Series 2006, 5.250%, 11/15/36 (Pre-refunded 11/15/16)
 
11/16 at 100.00
N/R (6)
   
2,488,876
 
     
Vandalia Butler City School District, Montgomery County, Ohio, General Obligation Bonds, School Improvement Series 2009:
             
 
685
 
5.125%, 12/01/37 (Pre-refunded 6/01/19)
 
6/19 at 100.00
N/R (6)
   
802,416
 
 
315
 
5.125%, 12/01/37 (Pre-refunded 6/01/19)
 
6/19 at 100.00
Aa3 (6)
   
368,994
 
 
39,765
 
Total U.S. Guaranteed
         
42,598,966
 
     
Utilities – 3.9% (2.7% of Total Investments)
             
     
American Municipal Power Ohio Inc., Prairie State Energy Campus Project Revenue Bonds, Series 2008A:
             
 
50
 
5.000%, 2/15/38 – AGC Insured
 
2/18 at 100.00
AA
   
54,623
 
 
295
 
5.250%, 2/15/43
 
2/18 at 100.00
A1
   
323,857
 
 
1,500
 
American Municipal Power Ohio Inc., Prairie State Energy Campus Project Revenue Bonds, Series 2015A, 5.000%, 2/15/42
 
2/24 at 100.00
A1
   
1,696,515
 
     
Cleveland, Ohio, Public Power System Revenue Bonds, Series 2008B:
             
 
2,000
 
0.000%, 11/15/28 – NPFG Insured
 
No Opt. Call
AA–
   
1,233,440
 
 
6,895
 
0.000%, 11/15/32 – NPFG Insured
 
No Opt. Call
AA–
   
3,397,511
 
 
2,155
 
0.000%, 11/15/34 – NPFG Insured
 
No Opt. Call
AA–
   
976,560
 
 
1,500
 
Ohio Air Quality Development Authority, Air Quality Revenue Refunding Bonds, Columbus Southern Power Company Project, Series 2009B, 5.800%, 12/01/38
 
12/19 at 100.00
Baa1
   
1,681,155
 
 
2,025
 
Ohio Air Quality Development Authority, Ohio, Revenue Bonds, Ohio Valley Electric Corporation Project, Series 2009E, 5.625%, 10/01/19
 
No Opt. Call
BBB–
   
2,299,388
 
 
950
 
Ohio Municipal Electric Generation Agency, Beneficial Interest Certificates, Belleville Hydroelectric Project – Joint Venture 5, Series 2001, 0.000%, 2/15/29 – NPFG Insured
 
No Opt. Call
AA–
   
591,204
 
 
17,370
 
Total Utilities
         
12,254,253
 
 
Nuveen Investments
 
47

 
 

 

NUO
Nuveen Ohio Quality Income Municipal Fund
 
 
Portfolio of Investments (continued)
February 28, 2015
 
 
Principal
     
Optional Call
         
 
Amount (000)
 
Description (1)
 
Provisions (2)
Ratings (3)
   
Value
 
     
Water and Sewer – 11.8% (8.2% of Total Investments)
             
$
8,150
 
Cincinnati, Ohio, Water System Revenue Bonds, Series 2012A, 5.000%, 12/01/37
 
12/21 at 100.00
AAA
 
$
9,384,151
 
 
865
 
City of Marysville, Ohio, Water System Mortgage Revenue Bonds, Series 2007, 5.000%, 12/01/32 – AMBAC Insured
 
12/17 at 100.00
A1
   
946,812
 
     
Cleveland, Ohio, Water Revenue Bonds, Second Lien Series 2012A:
             
 
2,500
 
5.000%, 1/01/25
 
1/22 at 100.00
Aa2
   
2,958,150
 
 
1,975
 
5.000%, 1/01/26
 
1/22 at 100.00
Aa2
   
2,317,682
 
 
2,035
 
Cleveland, Ohio, Water Revenue Bonds, Senior Lien Series 2012X, 5.000%, 1/01/42
 
1/22 at 100.00
Aa1
   
2,285,061
 
 
1,015
 
Cleveland, Ohio, Waterworks First Mortgage Revenue Refunding and Improvement Bonds, Series 1993G, 5.500%, 1/01/21 – NPFG Insured
 
No Opt. Call
Aa1
   
1,165,129
 
 
1,275
 
Hamilton County, Ohio, Sewer System Revenue Bonds, Metropolitan Sewer District of Greater Cincinnati, Refunding Series 2014A, 5.000%, 12/01/31
 
12/24 at 100.00
AA+
   
1,514,267
 
 
1,220
 
Hamilton, Ohio, Wastewater System Revenue Bonds, Series 2005, 5.250%, 10/01/22 – AGM Insured
 
10/15 at 100.00
A1
   
1,255,807
 
 
2,025
 
Ironton, Ohio, Sewer System Improvement Revenue Bonds, Series 2011, 5.250%, 12/01/40 – AGM Insured
 
12/20 at 100.00
A2
   
2,242,850
 
 
1,670
 
Marysville, Ohio, Wastewater Treatment System Revenue Bonds, Series 2006, 5.250%, 12/01/24 – SYNCORA GTY Insured
 
12/16 at 100.00
A–
   
1,808,276
 
 
225
 
Marysville, Ohio, Wastewater Treatment System Revenue Bonds, Series 2007, 5.000%, 12/01/37 – SYNCORA GTY Insured
 
12/17 at 100.00
A–
   
245,896
 
 
2,000
 
Northeast Ohio Regional Sewer District, Wastewater Improvement Revenue Bonds, Series 2013, 5.000%, 11/15/38
 
5/23 at 100.00
AA+
   
2,286,160
 
 
4,000
 
Ohio Water Development Authority, Water Pollution Control Loan Fund Revenue Bonds, Series 2014, 5.000%, 12/01/23
 
No Opt. Call
AAA
   
4,985,600
 
     
Toledo, Ohio, Sewerage System Revenue Bonds, Refunding Series 2013:
             
 
820
 
5.000%, 11/15/25
 
11/23 at 100.00
Aa3
   
977,612
 
 
605
 
5.000%, 11/15/26
 
11/23 at 100.00
Aa3
   
714,475
 
 
1,075
 
5.000%, 11/15/27
 
11/23 at 100.00
Aa3
   
1,259,137
 
 
695
 
5.000%, 11/15/28
 
11/23 at 100.00
Aa3
   
808,132
 
 
32,150
 
Total Water and Sewer
         
37,155,197
 
$
435,360
 
Total Long-Term Investments (cost $418,813,528)
         
455,253,839
 
     
Variable Rate Demand Preferred Shares, at Liquidation Value – (47.0)% (7)
         
(148,000,000
)
     
Other Assets Less Liabilities – 2.5% (8)
         
7,887,895
 
     
Net Assets Applicable to Common Shares – 100%
       
$
315,141,734
 
 
48
 
Nuveen Investments

 
 

 
 
Investments in Derivatives as of February 28, 2015
Credit Default Swaps outstanding:
 
           
Current
                   
Unrealized
 
       
Buy/Sell
 
Credit
   
Notional
 
Fixed Rate
 
Termination
     
Appreciation
 
Counterparty
 
Referenced Entity
Protection (9
)
Spread (10
)
 
Amount
 
(Annualized
)
Date
 
Value
 
(Depreciation
)
Goldman Sachs
 
Commonwealth of Puerto Rico
 
Buy
   
26.75-29.25
%
 
$
3,850,000
   
5.000
%
 
12/20/19
 
$
1,082,126
 
$
197,460
 
 
(1)
All percentages shown in the Portfolio of Investments are based on net assets applicable to common shares unless otherwise noted.
(2)
Optional Call Provisions (not covered by the report of independent registered public accounting firm): Dates (month and year) and prices of the earliest optional call or redemption. There may be other call provisions at varying prices at later dates. Certain mortgage-backed securities may be subject to periodic principal paydowns.
(3)
Ratings (not covered by the report of independent registered public accounting firm): Using the highest of Standard & Poor’s Group (“Standard & Poor’s”), Moody’s Investors Service, Inc. (“Moody’s”) or Fitch, Inc. (“Fitch”) rating. Ratings below BBB by Standard & Poor’s, Baa by Moody’s or BBB by Fitch are considered to be below investment grade. Holdings designated N/R are not rated by any of these national rating agencies.
(4)
Investment, or portion of investment, has been pledged to collateralize the net payment obligations for investments in derivatives and/or inverse floating rate transactions.
(5)
As of, or subsequent to, the end of the reporting period this security is non-income producing. Non-income producing, in the case of a fixed-income security, generally denotes that the issuer has (1) defaulted on the payment of principal or interest, (2) is under the protection of the Federal Bankruptcy Court or (3) the Fund’s Adviser has concluded that the issue is not likely to meet its future interest payment obligations and has ceased accruing additional income on the Fund’s records.
(6)
Backed by an escrow or trust containing sufficient U.S. Government or U.S. Government agency securities, which ensure the timely payment of principal and interest. Certain bonds backed by U.S. Government or agency securities are regarded as having an implied rating equal to the rating of such securities.
(7)
Variable Rate Demand Preferred Shares, at Liquidation Value as a percentage of Total Investments is 32.5%.
(8)
Other assets less liabilities includes the unrealized appreciation (depreciation) of certain over-the-counter derivatives as presented on the Statement of Assets and Liabilities. The unrealized appreciation (depreciation) of exchange-cleared and exchange-traded derivatives is recognized as part of the cash collateral at brokers and/or the receivable or payable for variation margin as presented on the Statement of Assets and Liabilities, when applicable.
(9)
The Fund entered into the credit default swap to gain investment exposure to the referenced entity. Selling protection has a similar credit risk position to owning that referenced entity. Buying protection has a similar credit risk position to selling the referenced entity short.
(10)
The credit spread generally serves as an indication of the current status of the payment/performance risk and therefore the likelihood of default of the credit derivative. The credit spread also reflects the cost of buying/selling protection and may include upfront payments required to be made to enter into a credit default swap contract. Higher credit spreads are indicative of a higher likelihood of performance by the seller of protection.
(IF)
Inverse floating rate investment.
 
See accompanying notes to financial statements.
 
 Nuveen Investments
 
49

 
 

 

NTX
   
 
Nuveen Texas Quality Income Municipal Fund
 
 
Portfolio of Investments
February 28, 2015
 
 
Principal
     
Optional Call
         
 
Amount (000)
 
Description (1)
 
Provisions (2)
Ratings (3)
   
Value
 
     
LONG-TERM INVESTMENTS – 144.1% (100.0% of Total Investments)
             
     
MUNICIPAL BONDS – 144.1% (100.0% of Total Investments)
             
     
Consumer Discretionary – 3.0% (2.1% of Total Investments)
             
     
Austin Convention Enterprises Inc., Texas, Convention Center Hotel Revenue Bonds, First Tier Series 2006A:
             
$
1,450
 
5.250%, 1/01/18 – SYNCORA GTY Insured
 
1/17 at 100.00
BBB–
 
$
1,536,638
 
 
1,000
 
5.000%, 1/01/34 – SYNCORA GTY Insured
 
1/17 at 100.00
BBB–
   
1,017,910
 
 
2,200
 
San Antonio Convention Center Hotel Finance Corporation, Texas, Contract Revenue Empowerment Zone Bonds, Series 2005A, 5.000%, 7/15/39 – AMBAC Insured (Alternative Minimum Tax)
 
7/15 at 100.00
BBB
   
2,229,436
 
 
4,650
 
Total Consumer Discretionary
         
4,783,984
 
     
Education and Civic Organizations – 14.9% (10.4% of Total Investments)
             
 
2,500
 
Board of Regents of the University of Texas, Permanent University Fund Bonds, Refunding Series 2015A, 5.000%, 7/01/28 (WI/DD, Settling 4/02/15)
 
7/24 at 100.00
AAA
   
3,009,800
 
 
2,000
 
Board of Regents, University of Texas System, Financing System Revenue Bonds, Refunding Series 2012B, 5.000%, 8/15/22
 
No Opt. Call
AAA
   
2,463,620
 
     
Clifton Higher Education Finance Corporation, Texas, Education Revenue Bonds, Uplift Education Charter School, Series 2013A:
             
 
2,000
 
4.350%, 12/01/42
 
12/22 at 100.00
BBB–
   
1,999,880
 
 
1,000
 
4.400%, 12/01/47
 
12/22 at 100.00
BBB–
   
999,940
 
 
1,000
 
Danbury Higher Education Authority, Texas, Charter School Revenue Bonds, John H. Wood Jr. Public Charter District, Inspire Academies, Series 2013A, 6.000%, 8/15/28
 
8/23 at 100.00
BBB–
   
1,111,320
 
 
1,000
 
Hale Center Education Facilities Corporation, Texas, Revenue Bonds, Wayland Baptist University Project, Improvement and Refunding Series 2010, 5.000%, 3/01/35
 
3/21 at 100.00
A–
   
1,080,110
 
 
1,000
 
Harris County Cultural Education Facilities Finance Corporation, Texas, Medical Facilities Revenue Refunding Bonds, Baylor College of Medicine, Series 2012A, 5.000%, 11/15/26
 
11/22 at 100.00
A–
   
1,145,630
 
 
3,000
 
Harris County Cultural Education Facilities Finance Corporation, Texas, Revenue Refunding Bonds, Young Men’s Christian Association of the Greater Houston Area, Series 2013A, 5.000%, 6/01/38
 
6/23 at 100.00
Baa3
   
3,211,290
 
 
2,000
 
Laredo Community College District, Webb County, Texas, Combined Fee Revenue Bonds, Series 2010, 5.250%, 8/01/35 – AGM Insured
 
8/20 at 100.00
AA
   
2,297,200
 
 
2,000
 
Lone Star College System, Harris, Montgomery and San Jacinto Counties, Texas, Revenue Financing System Bonds, Series 2013, 5.000%, 2/15/36
 
2/21 at 100.00
AA
   
2,278,280
 
 
200
 
Newark Cultural Education Facilities Finance Corporation, Texas, Lease Revenue Bonds, A.W. Brown-Fellowship Leadership Academy, Series 2012A, 6.000%, 8/15/42
 
8/15 at 103.00
BBB–
   
206,478
 
     
Red River Education Finance Corporation, Texas, Revenue Bonds, Hockaday School, Series 2005:
             
 
1,170
 
5.000%, 5/15/27
 
5/15 at 100.00
AA
   
1,181,677
 
 
1,230
 
5.000%, 5/15/28
 
5/15 at 100.00
AA
   
1,241,943
 
 
1,290
 
5.000%, 5/15/29
 
5/15 at 100.00
AA
   
1,302,255
 
 
21,390
 
Total Education and Civic Organizations
         
23,529,423
 
     
Energy – 1.3% (0.9% of Total Investments)
             
 
2,000
 
Gulf Coast Industrial Development Authority, Texas, Solid Waste Disposal Revenue Bonds, Citgo Petroleum Corporation Project, Series 1995, 4.875%, 5/01/25 (Alternative Minimum Tax)
 
10/22 at 100.00
BB
   
2,111,160
 
     
Health Care – 10.9% (7.5% of Total Investments)
             
 
1,000
 
Harris County Cultural Education Facilities Finance Corporation, Texas, Hospital Revenue Bonds, Memorial Hermann Healthcare System, Refunding Series 2013A, 5.000%, 12/01/35
 
12/22 at 100.00
A+
   
1,105,060
 
 
1,350
 
Harrison County Health Facilities Development Corporation, Texas, Hospital Revenue Bonds, Good Shepherd Health System, Refunding Series 2010, 5.250%, 7/01/28
 
7/20 at 100.00
BB–
   
1,303,439
 
 
2,000
 
North Central Texas Health Facilities Development Corporation, Texas, Revenue Bonds, Children’s Medical Center Dallas Project, Series 2009, 5.750%, 8/15/39
 
8/19 at 100.00
Aa2
   
2,313,380
 
 
50
 
Nuveen Investments

 
 

 
 
 
Principal
     
Optional Call
         
 
Amount (000)
 
Description (1)
 
Provisions (2)
Ratings (3)
   
Value
 
     
Health Care (continued)
             
$
885
 
North Central Texas Health Facilities Development Corporation, Texas, Revenue Bonds, Children’s Medical Center Dallas Project, Series 2012, 5.000%, 8/15/32
 
8/22 at 100.00
Aa2
 
$
1,010,874
 
 
515
 
Tarrant County Cultural Education Facilities Finance Corporation, Texas, Hospital Revenue Bonds, Hendrick Medical Center, Series 2013, 5.125%, 9/01/33
 
9/23 at 100.00
A2
   
573,931
 
 
1,250
 
Tarrant County Cultural Education Facilities Finance Corporation, Texas, Hospital Revenue Bonds, Scott & White Healthcare Project, Series 2010, 5.250%, 8/15/40
 
8/20 at 100.00
Aa3
   
1,421,875
 
 
1,590
 
Tarrant County Cultural Education Facilities Finance Corporation, Texas, Revenue Bonds, Christus Health, Refunding Series 2008A, 6.500%, 7/01/37 – AGC Insured
 
1/19 at 100.00
AA
   
1,847,039
 
 
2,510
 
Tarrant County Cultural Education Facilities Finance Corporation, Texas, Revenue Bonds, Texas Health Resources, Series 2007B, 5.000%, 11/15/42
 
11/17 at 100.00
AA
   
2,703,220
 
 
1,720
 
Tyler Health Facilities Development Corporation, Texas, Hospital Revenue Bonds, East Texas Medical Center Regional Healthcare System, Series 2007A, 5.375%, 11/01/37
 
11/17 at 100.00
Baa2
   
1,802,336
 
 
700
 
Tyler Health Facilities Development Corporation, Texas, Hospital Revenue Bonds, Mother Frances Hospital Regional Healthcare Center, Series 2007B, 5.000%, 7/01/37
 
7/17 at 100.00
Baa1
   
723,646
 
 
2,250
 
Tyler Health Facilities Development Corporation, Texas, Hospital Revenue Bonds, Mother Frances Hospital Regional Healthcare Center, Series 2007, 5.000%, 7/01/33
 
7/17 at 100.00
Baa1
   
2,328,570
 
 
15,770
 
Total Health Care
         
17,133,370
 
     
Housing/Multifamily – 2.1% (1.4% of Total Investments)
             
 
3,000
 
New Hope Cultural Education Facilities Finance Corporation, Texas, Student Housing Revenue Bonds, CHF-Collegiate Housing Foundation – College Station I LLC – Texas A&M University Project, Series 2014A, 5.000%, 4/01/46 – AGM Insured
 
4/24 at 100.00
AA
   
3,291,300
 
     
Long-Term Care – 1.0% (0.7% of Total Investments)
             
     
Bexar County, Texas, Health Facilities Development Corporation Revenue Bonds, Army Retirement Residence, Series 2007:
             
 
865
 
5.000%, 7/01/27
 
7/17 at 100.00
BBB
   
900,560
 
 
600
 
5.000%, 7/01/37
 
7/17 at 100.00
BBB
   
620,268
 
 
1,465
 
Total Long-Term Care
         
1,520,828
 
     
Tax Obligation/General – 30.8% (21.4% of Total Investments)
             
 
400
 
Calallen Independent School District, Nueces County, Texas, General Obligation Bonds, School Building Series 2008, 5.000%, 2/15/38
 
2/18 at 100.00
AAA
   
441,012
 
 
1,620
 
Cameron County, Texas, General Obligation Bonds, State Highway 550 Project, Series 2012, 5.000%, 2/15/32 – AGM Insured
 
2/22 at 100.00
AA
   
1,816,911
 
 
1,500
 
College Station, Texas, Certificates of Obligation, Series 2012, 5.000%, 2/15/32
 
2/21 at 100.00
AA+
   
1,721,340
 
 
1,000
 
El Paso County Hospital District, Texas, General Obligation Bonds, Refunding Series 2013, 5.000%, 8/15/33
 
8/23 at 100.00
AA–
   
1,121,140
 
 
1,750
 
El Paso County, Texas, Certificates of Obligation, Series 2001, 5.000%, 2/15/21 – AGM Insured
 
No Opt. Call
AA
   
2,096,973
 
 
8,500
 
Grand Prairie Independent School District, Dallas County, Texas, General Obligation Bonds, Capital Appreciation Refunding Series 2009, 0.000%, 8/15/39
 
8/18 at 22.64
AA
   
1,811,520
 
 
3,255
 
Hutto Independent School District, Williamson County, Texas, General Obligation Bonds, Refunding Series 2012A, 0.000%, 8/01/45
 
8/21 at 100.00
A
   
591,759
 
 
1,360
 
Jacksonville Independent School District, Cherokee County, Texas, General Obligation Bonds, School Building Series 2014, 5.000%, 2/15/39
 
2/24 at 100.00
Aaa
   
1,566,666
 
 
2,675
 
Laredo Community College District, Webb County, Texas, General Obligation Bonds, Series 2014, 5.000%, 8/01/34
 
8/24 at 100.00
AA–
   
3,111,453
 
 
1,000
 
Leander Independent School District, Williamson and Travis Counties, Texas, General Obligation Bonds, Series 2008, 0.000%, 8/15/36
 
8/17 at 33.01
AAA
   
318,080
 
 
365
 
Lone Star College System, Harris and Montgomery Counties, Texas, General Obligation Bonds, Series 2009, 5.000%, 8/15/34
 
8/19 at 100.00
AAA
   
414,516
 
 
1,350
 
Lubbock Independent School District, Lubbock County, Texas, General Obligation Bonds, School Building Series 2013A, 5.000%, 2/15/43
 
No Opt. Call
AAA
   
1,544,171
 
 
1,750
 
Martin County Hospital District, Texas, Combination Limited Tax and Revenue Bonds, Series 2011A, 7.250%, 4/01/36
 
4/21 at 100.00
BBB
   
1,977,570
 
 
Nuveen Investments
 
51

 
 

 

NTX
Nuveen Texas Quality Income Municipal Fund
 
 
Portfolio of Investments (continued)
February 28, 2015
 
 
Principal
     
Optional Call
         
 
Amount (000)
 
Description (1)
 
Provisions (2)
Ratings (3)
   
Value
 
     
Tax Obligation/General (continued)
             
     
McCamey County Hospital District, Texas, General Obligation Bonds, Series 2013:
             
$
1,000
 
5.750%, 12/01/33
 
12/25 at 100.00
Baa2
 
$
1,126,090
 
 
1,000
 
6.125%, 12/01/38
 
12/25 at 100.00
Baa2
   
1,129,580
 
 
1,010
 
Mercedes Independent School District, Hidalgo County, Texas, General Obligation Bonds, Series 2005, 5.000%, 8/15/23
 
8/15 at 100.00
AAA
   
1,032,715
 
 
1,500
 
Montgomery County, Texas, General Obligation Bonds, Refunding Series 2008B, 5.250%, 3/01/32
 
3/19 at 100.00
AA+
   
1,709,295
 
 
2,000
 
Plano Independent School District, Collin County, Texas, General Obligation Bonds, Series 2008A, 5.250%, 2/15/34
 
2/18 at 100.00
Aaa
   
2,226,940
 
 
1,425
 
Port of Houston Authority, Harris County, Texas, General Obligation Bonds, Series 2010E, 0.000%, 10/01/35
 
No Opt. Call
AAA
   
769,415
 
 
205
 
Reagan Hospital District of Reagan County, Texas, Limited Tax Revenue Bonds, Series 2014A, 5.125%, 2/01/39
 
2/24 at 100.00
Baa2
   
217,501
 
     
Roma Independent School District, Texas, General Obligation Bonds, Series 2005:
             
 
1,110
 
5.000%, 8/15/22
 
8/15 at 100.00
AAA
   
1,134,964
 
 
1,165
 
5.000%, 8/15/23 – AGM Insured
 
8/15 at 100.00
AAA
   
1,191,201
 
 
2,000
 
Texas State, General Obligation Bonds, Transportation Commission Highway Improvement Series 2012A, 5.000%, 4/01/42
 
No Opt. Call
AAA
   
2,285,420
 
 
2,000
 
Texas State, General Obligation Bonds, Transportation Commission Highway Improvement, Series 2014, 5.000%, 4/01/44
 
4/24 at 100.00
AAA
   
2,319,720
 
 
2,000
 
Texas State, General Obligation Bonds, Transportation Commission Mobility Fund, Refunding Series 2014, 5.000%, 10/01/34
 
4/24 at 100.00
AAA
   
2,351,060
 
 
5,000
 
Texas State, General Obligation Bonds, Transportation Commission Mobility Fund, Series 2006A, 5.000%, 4/01/33 – FGIC Insured (UB)
 
4/17 at 100.00
AAA
   
5,426,550
 
 
1,000
 
Texas State, General Obligation Bonds, Transportation Commission Mobility Fund, Series 2008, 5.000%, 4/01/30 (UB)
 
4/18 at 100.00
AAA
   
1,116,470
 
 
3,025
 
Victoria Independent School District, Victoria County, Texas, General Obligation Bonds, School Building Series 2007, 5.000%, 2/15/32
 
2/17 at 100.00
AAA
   
3,268,785
 
     
West Texas Independent School District, McLennan and Hill Counties, General Obligation Refunding Bonds, Series 1998:
             
 
45
 
0.000%, 8/15/22
 
8/15 at 68.26
AAA
   
30,072
 
 
45
 
0.000%, 8/15/24
 
8/15 at 61.20
AAA
   
26,964
 
     
White Settlement Independent School District, Tarrant County, Texas, General Obligation Bonds, Series 2006:
             
 
240
 
0.000%, 8/15/43
 
8/15 at 23.11
AAA
   
54,576
 
 
240
 
0.000%, 8/15/44
 
8/15 at 21.88
AAA
   
51,646
 
 
65
 
0.000%, 8/15/45
 
8/15 at 20.76
AAA
   
13,272
 
 
9,000
 
Wylie Independent School District, Collin County, Texas, General Obligation Bonds, Capital Appreciation Series 2015, 0.000%, 8/15/45 (WI/DD, Settling 3/05/15)
 
8/25 at 44.15
Aaa
   
2,597,400
 
 
61,600
 
Total Tax Obligation/General
         
48,612,747
 
     
Tax Obligation/Limited – 15.3% (10.6% of Total Investments)
             
 
1,000
 
Bexar County, Texas, Venue Project Revenue Bonds, Refunding Series 2010, 5.250%, 8/15/38 – AGM Insured
 
8/19 at 100.00
AA
   
1,132,100
 
 
1,175
 
Dallas Area Rapid Transit, Texas, Sales Tax Revenue Bonds, Refunding Senior Lien Series 2014A, 5.000%, 12/01/36
 
12/24 at 100.00
AA+
   
1,380,132
 
 
3,315
 
Dallas Area Rapid Transit, Texas, Sales Tax Revenue Bonds, Senior Lien Refunding Series 2007, 5.000%, 12/01/36 – AMBAC Insured
 
12/16 at 100.00
AA+
   
3,534,287
 
 
500
 
Flower Mound, Texas, Special Assessment Revenue Bonds, River Walk Public Improvement District 1, Series 2014, 6.500%, 9/01/36
 
No Opt. Call
N/R
   
533,375
 
 
1,390
 
Harris County Metropolitan Transit Authority, Texas, Sales and Use Tax Revenue Bonds, Series 2011A, 5.000%, 11/01/41
 
11/21 at 100.00
AA+
   
1,571,590
 
 
52
 
Nuveen Investments

 
 

 
 
 
Principal
     
Optional Call
         
 
Amount (000)
 
Description (1)
 
Provisions (2)
Ratings (3)
   
Value
 
     
Tax Obligation/Limited (continued)
             
     
Harris County-Houston Sports Authority, Texas, Revenue Bonds, Junior Lien Series 2001H:
             
$
300
 
0.000%, 11/15/24 – NPFG Insured
 
No Opt. Call
AA–
 
$
205,929
 
 
210
 
0.000%, 11/15/32 – NPFG Insured
 
11/31 at 94.05
AA–
   
94,479
 
 
260
 
0.000%, 11/15/33 – NPFG Insured
 
11/31 at 88.44
AA–
   
109,096
 
 
2,045
 
0.000%, 11/15/34 – NPFG Insured
 
11/31 at 83.17
AA–
   
806,957
 
 
1,130
 
0.000%, 11/15/36 – NPFG Insured
 
11/31 at 73.51
AA–
   
390,935
 
 
4,270
 
0.000%, 11/15/38 – NPFG Insured
 
11/31 at 64.91
AA–
   
1,293,767
 
 
2,260
 
0.000%, 11/15/39 – NPFG Insured
 
11/31 at 60.98
AA–
   
643,264
 
 
400
 
Harris County-Houston Sports Authority, Texas, Revenue Bonds, Refunding Second Lien Series 2014C, 5.000%, 11/15/34
 
11/24 at 100.00
A3
   
452,208
 
 
3,440
 
Harris County-Houston Sports Authority, Texas, Revenue Bonds, Senior Lien Series 2001G, 0.000%, 11/15/41 – NPFG Insured
 
11/31 at 53.78
AA–
   
906,234
 
 
1,000
 
Harris County-Houston Sports Authority, Texas, Revenue Bonds, Third Lien Series 2004A-3, 0.000%, 11/15/33 – NPFG Insured
 
11/24 at 59.10
AA–
   
381,520
 
 
1,500
 
Houston, Texas, Hotel Occupancy Tax and Special Revenue Bonds, Convention and Entertainment Facilities Department, Refunding Series 2011B, 5.000%, 9/01/30
 
No Opt. Call
A2
   
1,548,945
 
 
1,015
 
Houston, Texas, Hotel Occupancy Tax and Special Revenue Bonds, Convention and Entertainment Facilities Department, Refunding Series 2014, 5.000%, 9/01/34
 
No Opt. Call
A2
   
1,139,886
 
 
1,470
 
Houston, Texas, Hotel Occupancy Tax and Special Revenue Bonds, Convention and Entertainment Project, Series 2001B, 0.000%, 9/01/32 – AMBAC Insured
 
No Opt. Call
A2
   
697,265
 
 
250
 
Little Elm. Texas, Valencia Public Improvement District Phase I Special Assessment Revenue Bonds, Series 2014, 7.150%, 9/01/37
 
3/18 at 103.00
N/R
   
262,813
 
 
3,000
 
North Texas Tollway Authority, Special Projects System Revenue Bonds, Current Interest Series 2011D, 5.000%, 9/01/31
 
9/21 at 100.00
AA+
   
3,505,590
 
 
2,000
 
North Texas Tollway Authority, Special Projects System Revenue Bonds, Series 2011A, 5.500%, 9/01/41
 
9/21 at 100.00
AA+
   
2,406,840
 
 
1,000
 
Uptown Development Authority, Houston, Texas, Tax Increment Revenue Bonds, Infrastructure Improvement Facilities, Series 2009, 5.500%, 9/01/29
 
9/19 at 100.00
BBB
   
1,111,880
 
 
32,930
 
Total Tax Obligation/Limited
         
24,109,092
 
     
Transportation – 17.0% (11.8% of Total Investments)
             
 
3,000
 
Austin, Texas, Airport System Revenue Bonds, Series 2015, 5.000%, 11/15/39 (Alternative Minimum Tax)
 
11/24 at 100.00
A1
   
3,370,440
 
     
Central Texas Regional Mobility Authority, Revenue Bonds, Senior Lien Series 2010:
             
 
2,945
 
0.000%, 1/01/36
 
No Opt. Call
BBB
   
1,153,674
 
 
2,205
 
0.000%, 1/01/37
 
No Opt. Call
BBB
   
824,053
 
 
2,160
 
0.000%, 1/01/38
 
No Opt. Call
BBB
   
769,673
 
 
1,000
 
0.000%, 1/01/40
 
No Opt. Call
BBB
   
320,100
 
 
665
 
Central Texas Regional Mobility Authority, Revenue Bonds, Subordinate Lien Refunding Series 2013, 5.000%, 1/01/42
 
1/23 at 100.00
BBB–
   
727,151
 
 
1,000
 
Dallas-Fort Worth International Airport, Texas, Joint Revenue Bonds, Refunding Series 2010A, 5.000%, 11/01/42
 
11/20 at 100.00
A+
   
1,101,630
 
 
1,165
 
Dallas-Fort Worth International Airport, Texas, Joint Revenue Bonds, Refunding Series 2012B, 5.000%, 11/01/35
 
11/20 at 100.00
A+
   
1,308,004
 
 
1,670
 
Grand Parkway Transportation Corporation, Texas, System Toll Revenue Bonds, First Tier Series 2013A, 5.125%, 10/01/43
 
10/23 at 100.00
BBB+
   
1,824,492
 
 
1,165
 
Harris County, Texas, Toll Road Revenue Bonds, Refunding Senior Lien Series 2012C, 5.000%, 8/15/31
 
No Opt. Call
AA
   
1,345,936
 
 
2,000
 
Houston, Texas, Subordinate Lien Airport System Revenue Refunding Bonds, Series 2012A, 5.000%, 7/01/31 (Alternative Minimum Tax)
 
7/22 at 100.00
A
   
2,225,580
 
 
3,000
 
Love Field Airport Modernization Corporation, Texas, Special Facilities Revenue Bonds, Southwest Airlines Company, Series 2010, 5.250%, 11/01/40
 
11/20 at 100.00
BBB
   
3,294,627
 
     
North Texas Tollway Authority, System Revenue Bonds, First Tier Series 2009A:
             
 
100
 
6.100%, 1/01/28
 
1/19 at 100.00
A2
   
117,201
 
 
2,000
 
6.250%, 1/01/39
 
1/19 at 100.00
A2
   
2,316,180
 
 
Nuveen Investments
 
53

 
 

 

NTX
Nuveen Texas Quality Income Municipal Fund
 
 
Portfolio of Investments (continued)
February 28, 2015
 
 
Principal
     
Optional Call
         
 
Amount (000)
 
Description (1)
 
Provisions (2)
Ratings (3)
   
Value
 
     
Transportation (continued)
             
$
395
 
North Texas Tollway Authority, System Revenue Bonds, Refunding First Tier, Series 2008A, 5.750%, 1/01/40
 
1/18 at 100.00
A2
 
$
439,576
 
     
North Texas Tollway Authority, System Revenue Bonds, Refunding First Tier, Series 2008B:
             
 
325
 
5.750%, 1/01/40
 
1/18 at 100.00
A2
   
361,676
 
 
225
 
5.750%, 1/01/40 – NPFG Insured
 
1/18 at 100.00
AA–
   
251,393
 
 
2,500
 
North Texas Tollway Authority, System Revenue Bonds, Refunding First Tier, Series 2008D, 0.000%, 1/01/36 – AGC Insured
 
No Opt. Call
AA
   
1,067,375
 
 
950
 
North Texas Tollway Authority, System Revenue Bonds, Refunding Second Tier, Series 2008F, 5.750%, 1/01/38
 
1/18 at 100.00
A3
   
1,052,173
 
 
2,500
 
San Antonio, Texas, Airport System Revenue Bonds, Refunding Series 2012, 5.000%, 7/01/27 (Alternative Minimum Tax)
 
7/22 at 100.00
A+
   
2,860,975
 
 
30,970
 
Total Transportation
         
26,731,909
 
     
U.S. Guaranteed – 16.0% (11.1% of Total Investments) (4)
             
 
2,000
 
Borger Independent School District, Hutchison County, Texas, General Obligation Bonds, Series 2006, 5.000%, 2/15/36 (Pre-refunded 2/15/16)
 
2/16 at 100.00
AAA
   
2,092,560
 
 
3,455
 
Brownsville, Texas, Utility System Priority Revenue Bonds, Series 2005A, 5.000%, 9/01/27 (Pre-refunded 9/01/15) – AMBAC Insured
 
9/15 at 100.00
A2 (4)
   
3,541,030
 
 
1,190
 
Canutillo Independent School District, El Paso County, Texas, General Obligation Bonds, Series 2006A, 5.000%, 8/15/22 (Pre-refunded 8/15/15)
 
8/15 at 100.00
AAA
   
1,217,132
 
 
4,625
 
Dallas Area Rapid Transit, Texas, Sales Tax Revenue Bonds, Senior Lien Refunding Series 2007, 5.000%, 12/01/36 (Pre-refunded 12/01/16) – AMBAC Insured
 
12/16 at 100.00
Aa2 (4)
   
5,000,224
 
 
1,000
 
El Paso, Texas, Water and Sewer Revenue Bonds, Refunding Series 2008C, 5.375%, 3/01/29 (Pre-refunded 3/01/18)
 
3/18 at 100.00
AA+ (4)
   
1,134,100
 
 
3,615
 
Frisco, Texas, General Obligation Bonds, Series 2006, 5.000%, 2/15/26 (Pre-refunded 2/15/16) – FGIC Insured
 
2/16 at 100.00
AA+ (4)
   
3,782,664
 
 
25
 
Lower Colorado River Authority, Texas, Revenue Bonds, Refunding Series 2012B, 5.000%, 5/15/29 (Pre-refunded 5/15/22)
 
5/22 at 100.00
N/R (4)
   
30,506
 
     
Lower Colorado River Authority, Texas, Revenue Bonds, Series 2008:
             
 
25
 
5.750%, 5/15/37 (Pre-refunded 5/15/15)
 
5/15 at 100.00
N/R (4)
   
25,306
 
 
40
 
5.750%, 5/15/37 (Pre-refunded 5/15/15)
 
5/15 at 100.00
N/R (4)
   
40,482
 
 
1,785
 
5.750%, 5/15/37 (Pre-refunded 5/15/15)
 
5/15 at 100.00
A2 (4)
   
1,806,813
 
 
1,000
 
Lufkin Health Facilities Development Corporation, Texas, Health System Revenue Bonds, Memorial Health System of East Texas, Series 2007, 5.500%, 2/15/32 (Pre-refunded 2/15/17)
 
2/17 at 100.00
Baa3 (4)
   
1,097,320
 
 
1,000
 
North Central Texas Health Facilities Development Corporation, Hospital Revenue Bonds, Presbyterian Healthcare System, Series 1996A, 5.750%, 6/01/26 – NPFG Insured (ETM)
 
No Opt. Call
Aaa
   
1,244,730
 
 
2,500
 
Retama Development Corporation, Texas, Special Facilities Revenue Bonds, Retama Park Racetrack, Series 1993, 8.750%, 12/15/18 (Pre-refunded 12/15/17)
 
12/17 at 100.00
Aaa
   
3,052,525
 
 
410
 
Tarrant County Cultural Education Facilities Finance Corporation, Texas, Revenue Bonds, Christus Health, Refunding Series 2008A, 6.500%, 7/01/37 (Pre-refunded 1/01/19) – AGC Insured
 
1/19 at 100.00
AA (4)
   
491,996
 
     
White Settlement Independent School District, Tarrant County, Texas, General Obligation Bonds, Series 2006:
             
 
1,260
 
0.000%, 8/15/43 (Pre-refunded 8/15/15)
 
8/15 at 23.11
N/R (4)
   
290,984
 
 
1,260
 
0.000%, 8/15/44 (Pre-refunded 8/15/15)
 
8/15 at 21.88
N/R (4)
   
275,373
 
 
360
 
0.000%, 8/15/45 (Pre-refunded 8/15/15)
 
8/15 at 20.76
N/R (4)
   
74,660
 
 
25,550
 
Total U.S. Guaranteed
         
25,198,405
 
     
Utilities – 15.8% (11.0% of Total Investments)
             
 
3,000
 
Austin, Texas, Electric Utility System Revenue Bonds, Refunding Series 2012A, 5.000%, 11/15/40
 
No Opt. Call
AA–
   
3,364,318
 
 
2,560
 
Brazos River Authority, Texas, Pollution Control Revenue Refunding Bonds, TXU Electric Company, Series 1999C, 7.700%, 3/01/32 (Alternative Minimum Tax) (5)
 
4/15 at 100.00
C
   
121,600
 
 
1,545
 
Brownsville, Texas, Utility System Priority Revenue Bonds, Series 2005A, 5.000%, 9/01/27 – AMBAC Insured
 
9/15 at 100.00
A+
   
1,579,701
 
 
2,000
 
Bryan, Brazos County, Texas, Electric System Revenue Bonds, Series 2009, 5.000%, 7/01/34
 
7/17 at 100.00
A+
   
2,166,920
 
 
3,000
 
Lower Colorado River Authority, Texas, Refunding Revenue Bonds, Series 2010A, 5.000%, 5/15/40
 
5/20 at 100.00
A1
   
3,309,420
 
 
54
 
Nuveen Investments

 
 

 
 
 
Principal
     
Optional Call
         
 
Amount (000)
 
Description (1)
 
Provisions (2)
Ratings (3)
   
Value
 
     
Utilities (continued)
             
$
1,150
 
Lower Colorado River Authority, Texas, Revenue Bonds, Refunding Series 2012A, 5.000%, 5/15/36
 
5/22 at 100.00
A1
 
$
1,285,539
 
 
1,975
 
Lower Colorado River Authority, Texas, Revenue Bonds, Refunding Series 2012B, 5.000%, 5/15/29
 
5/22 at 100.00
A1
   
2,251,520
 
 
150
 
Lower Colorado River Authority, Texas, Revenue Bonds, Series 2008, 5.750%, 5/15/37
 
5/15 at 100.00
A1
   
151,623
 
 
1,500
 
Matagorda County Navigation District Number One, Texas, Pollution Control Revenue Refunding Bonds, Central Power and Light Company Project, Series 2009A, 6.300%, 11/01/29
 
7/19 at 102.00
Baa1
   
1,729,170
 
 
1,000
 
Sam Rayburn Municipal Power Agency, Texas, Power Supply System Revenue Bonds, Refunding Series 2012, 5.000%, 10/01/20
 
No Opt. Call
BBB+
   
1,164,490
 
     
Texas Municipal Gas Acquisition and Supply Corporation I, Gas Supply Revenue Bonds, Senior Lien Series 2008D:
             
 
770
 
5.625%, 12/15/17
 
No Opt. Call
A–
   
830,853
 
 
3,000
 
6.250%, 12/15/26
 
No Opt. Call
A–
   
3,742,228
 
 
1,000
 
Texas Municipal Gas Acquisition and Supply Corporation I, Gas Supply Revenue Bonds, Series 2006A, 5.250%, 12/15/20
 
No Opt. Call
A–
   
1,152,890
 
     
Texas Municipal Power Agency, Revenue Bonds, Transmission Refunding Series 2010:
             
 
640
 
5.000%, 9/01/34
 
9/20 at 100.00
A+
   
711,130
 
 
1,000
 
5.000%, 9/01/40
 
9/20 at 100.00
A+
   
1,108,880
 
 
325
 
Texas State, General Obligation Bonds, Water Utility, Series 2001, 5.250%, 8/01/23
 
8/15 at 100.00
AAA
   
326,378
 
 
24,615
 
Total Utilities
         
24,996,660
 
     
Water and Sewer – 16.0% (11.1% of Total Investments)
             
 
1,575
 
Bell County Water Control Improvement District 1, Texas, Water Revenue Bonds, Series 2014, 5.000%, 7/10/38 – BAM Insured
 
7/23 at 100.00
AA
   
1,782,900
 
 
2,500
 
Bexar Metropolitan Water District, Texas, Waterworks System Revenue Bonds, Refunding Series 2010, 5.875%, 5/01/40
 
5/20 at 100.00
A+
   
2,917,025
 
 
2,500
 
Canadian River Municipal Water Authority, Texas, Contract Revenue Bonds, Conjunctive Use Groundwater Supply Project, Subordinate Lien Series 2011, 5.000%, 2/15/31
 
2/21 at 100.00
AA
   
2,837,000
 
 
2,000
 
Corpus Christi, Texas, Utility System Revenue Bonds, Improvement Junior Lien Series 2013, 5.000%, 7/15/43
 
7/23 at 100.00
A1
   
2,254,980
 
 
2,000
 
Houston, Texas, First Lien Combined Utility System Revenue Bonds, Refunding Series 2012D, 5.000%, 11/15/42
 
11/22 at 100.00
AA
   
2,273,640
 
     
Irving, Texas, Waterworks and Sewerage Revenue Bonds, Subordinate Lien Series 2004:
             
 
100
 
5.000%, 8/15/22 – AMBAC Insured
 
8/15 at 100.00
Aa1
   
100,403
 
 
105
 
5.000%, 8/15/23 – AMBAC Insured
 
8/15 at 100.00
Aa1
   
105,423
 
 
4,000
 
Laredo, Webb County, Texas, Waterworks and Sewer System Revenue Bonds, Series 2010, 5.250%, 3/01/40
 
3/20 at 100.00
AA–
   
4,634,880
 
 
710
 
North Fort Bend Water Authority, Texas, Water System Revenue Bonds, Series 2011, 5.000%, 12/15/36 – AGM Insured
 
12/21 at 100.00
AA
   
791,643
 
 
3,860
 
North Harris County Regional Water Authority, Texas, Water Revenue Bonds, Senior Lien Refunding Series 2013, 5.000%, 12/15/33
 
12/22 at 100.00
AA–
   
4,401,828
 
 
2,640
 
San Antonio, Texas, Water System Revenue Bonds, Refunding Junior Lien Series 2015B, 5.000%, 5/15/34
 
5/25 at 100.00
AA
   
3,106,620
 
 
21,990
 
Total Water and Sewer
         
25,206,342
 
$
245,930
 
Total Long-Term Investments (cost $209,619,780)
         
227,225,220
 
     
Floating Rate Obligations – (2.5)%
         
(3,960,000
)
     
MuniFund Term Preferred Shares, at Liquidation Value – (45.0)% (6)
         
(70,920,000
)
     
Other Assets Less Liabilities – 3.4% (7)
         
5,298,972
 
     
Net Assets Applicable to Common Shares – 100%
       
$
157,644,192
 
 
Nuveen Investments
 
55

 
 

 

NTX
Nuveen Texas Quality Income Municipal Fund
 
 
Portfolio of Investments (continued)
February 28, 2015
 
Investments in Derivatives as of February 28, 2015
Credit Default Swaps outstanding:
 
           
Current
                 
Unrealized
 
       
Buy/Sell
 
Credit
 
Notional
 
Fixed Rate
 
Termination
     
Appreciation
 
Counterparty
 
Referenced Entity
Protection (8
)
Spread (9
)
Amount
 
(Annualized
)
Date
 
Value
 
(Depreciation
)
Citibank N.A.
 
Commonwealth of Puerto Rico
 
Buy
   
28.5-30.0
%
$
1,830,000
   
5.000
%
 
12/20/19
 
$
514,361
 
$
94,558
 
 
(1)
All percentages shown in the Portfolio of Investments are based on net assets applicable to common shares unless otherwise noted.
(2)
Optional Call Provisions (not covered by the report of independent registered public accounting firm): Dates (month and year) and prices of the earliest optional call or redemption. There may be other call provisions at varying prices at later dates. Certain mortgage-backed securities may be subject to periodic principal paydowns.
(3)
Ratings (not covered by the report of independent registered public accounting firm): Using the highest of Standard & Poor’s Group (“Standard & Poor’s”), Moody’s Investors Service, Inc. (“Moody’s”) or Fitch, Inc. (“Fitch”) rating. Ratings below BBB by Standard & Poor’s, Baa by Moody’s or BBB by Fitch are considered to be below investment grade. Holdings designated N/R are not rated by any of these national rating agencies.
(4)
Backed by an escrow or trust containing sufficient U.S. Government or U.S. Government agency securities, which ensure the timely payment of principal and interest. Certain bonds backed by U.S. Government or agency securities are regarded as having an implied rating equal to the rating of such securities.
(5)
As of, or subsequent to, the end of the reporting period this security is non-income producing. Non-income producing, in the case of a fixed-income security, generally denotes that the issuer has (1) defaulted on the payment of principal or interest, (2) is under the protection of the Federal Bankruptcy Court or (3) the Fund’s Adviser has concluded that the issue is not likely to meet its future interest payment obligations and has ceased accruing additional income on the Fund’s records.
(6)
MuniFund Term Preferred Shares, at Liquidation Value as a percentage of Total Investments is 31.2%.
(7)
Other assets less liabilities includes the unrealized appreciation (depreciation) of certain over-the-counter derivatives as presented on the Statement of Assets and Liabilities. The unrealized appreciation (depreciation) of exchange-cleared and exchange-traded derivatives is recognized as part of the cash collateral at brokers and/or the receivable or payable for variation margin as presented on the Statement of Assets and Liabilities, when applicable.
(8)
The Fund entered into the credit default swap to gain investment exposure to the referenced entity. Selling protection has a similar credit risk position to owning that referenced entity. Buying protection has a similar credit risk position to selling the referenced entity short.
(9)
The credit spread generally serves as an indication of the current status of the payment/performance risk and therefore the likelihood of default of the credit derivative. The credit spread also reflects the cost of buying/selling protection and may include upfront payments required to be made to enter into a credit default swap contract. Higher credit spreads are indicative of a higher likelihood of performance by the seller of protection.
(ETM)
Escrowed to maturity.
(UB)
Underlying bond of an inverse floating rate trust reflected as a financing transaction. See Notes to Financial Statements, Note 3 – Portfolio Securities and Investments in Derivatives, Inverse Floating Rate Securities for more information.
(WI/DD)
Investment, or portion of investment, purchased on a when-issued or delayed delivery basis.
 
See accompanying notes to financial statements.
 
56
 
Nuveen Investments
 
 
 

 

Statement of
 
 
 
Assets and Liabilities
February 28, 2015
 
     
Arizona
   
Michigan
   
Ohio
   
Texas
 
     
Premium
   
Quality
   
Quality
   
Quality
 
     
Income
   
Income
   
Income
   
Income
 
     
(NAZ
)
 
(NUM
)
 
(NUO
)
 
(NTX
)
Assets
                         
Long-term investments, at value (cost $231,298,587, $447,565,543, $418,813,528 and $209,619,780, respectively)
 
$
252,613,261
 
$
481,664,022
 
$
455,253,839
 
$
227,225,220
 
Cash
   
1,300,225
   
10,493,167
   
2,876,694
   
3,984,734
 
Credit default swaps premiums paid
   
   
904,298
   
884,666
   
419,803
 
Unrealized appreciation on credit default swaps
   
   
187,352
   
197,460
   
94,558
 
Receivable for:
                         
Interest
   
2,513,716
   
6,074,540
   
5,150,166
   
2,464,623
 
Investments sold
   
   
   
   
4,529,313
 
Deferred offering costs
   
86,876
   
135,217
   
280,943
   
223,891
 
Other assets
   
1,157
   
31,499
   
129,790
   
969
 
Total assets
   
256,515,235
   
499,490,095
   
464,773,558
   
238,943,111
 
Liabilities
                         
Floating rate obligations
   
2,755,000
   
6,625,000
   
   
3,960,000
 
Payable for:
                         
Common share dividends
   
747,784
   
1,309,508
   
1,256,132
   
512,190
 
Interest
   
58,785
   
118,313
   
   
135,930
 
Investments purchased
   
   
2,796,832
   
   
5,578,330
 
Offering costs
   
825
   
   
1,201
   
 
MuniFund Term Preferred (“MTP”) Shares, at liquidation value
   
   
   
   
70,920,000
 
Variable Rate MuniFund Term Preferred (“VMTP”) Shares, at liquidation value
   
79,000,000
   
159,000,000
   
   
 
Variable Rate Demand Preferred (“VRDP”) Shares, at liquidation value
   
   
   
148,000,000
   
 
Accrued expenses:
                         
Management fees
   
123,631
   
227,520
   
221,017
   
108,696
 
Trustees fees
   
2,458
   
34,706
   
10,757
   
2,225
 
Other
   
178,609
   
146,330
   
142,717
   
81,548
 
Total liabilities
   
82,867,092
   
170,258,209
   
149,631,824
   
81,298,919
 
Net assets applicable to common shares
 
$
173,648,143
 
$
329,231,886
 
$
315,141,734
 
$
157,644,192
 
Common shares outstanding
   
11,563,886
   
20,833,387
   
18,521,955
   
10,027,210
 
Net asset value (“NAV”) per common share outstanding
 
$
15.02
 
$
15.80
 
$
17.01
 
$
15.72
 
Net assets applicable to common shares consist of:
                         
Common shares, $0.01 par value per share
 
$
115,639
 
$
208,334
 
$
185,220
 
$
100,272
 
Paid-in surplus
   
157,663,450
   
295,604,465
   
281,391,428
   
141,884,337
 
Undistributed (Over-distribution of) net investment income
   
1,493,133
   
731,592
   
495,988
   
80,176
 
Accumulated net realized gain (loss)
   
(6,938,753
)
 
(1,598,336
)
 
(3,568,673
)
 
(2,120,591
)
Net unrealized appreciation (depreciation)
   
21,314,674
   
34,285,831
   
36,637,771
   
17,699,998
 
Net assets applicable to common shares
 
$
173,648,143
 
$
329,231,886
 
$
315,141,734
 
$
157,644,192
 
Authorized shares:
                         
Common
   
Unlimited
   
Unlimited
   
Unlimited
   
Unlimited
 
Preferred
   
Unlimited
   
Unlimited
   
Unlimited
   
Unlimited
 
 
See accompanying notes to financial statements.
 
Nuveen Investments
 
57

 
 

 

Statement of
   
 
Operations
Year Ended February 28, 2015
 
     
Arizona
   
Michigan
   
Ohio
   
Texas
 
     
Premium
   
Quality
   
Quality
   
Quality
 
     
Income
   
Income
   
Income
   
Income
 
     
(NAZ
)
 
(NUM
)
 
(NUO
)
 
(NTX
)
Investment Income
 
$
11,759,596
 
$
21,658,007
 
$
20,710,630
 
$
9,841,415
 
Expenses
                         
Management fees
   
1,588,427
   
2,926,019
   
2,875,579
   
1,396,308
 
Interest expense and amortization of offering costs
   
848,894
   
1,698,227
   
227,579
   
1,938,512
 
Liquidity fees
   
   
   
1,375,484
   
 
Remarketing fees
   
   
   
150,055
   
 
Custodian fees
   
46,990
   
83,828
   
80,565
   
44,709
 
Trustees fees
   
7,773
   
14,847
   
14,087
   
7,069
 
Professional fees
   
46,553
   
91,708
   
63,885
   
31,622
 
Shareholder reporting expenses
   
12,302
   
35,787
   
25,811
   
21,023
 
Shareholder servicing agent fees
   
15,377
   
35,370
   
16,485
   
23,392
 
Stock exchange listing fees
   
8,863
   
12,654
   
8,873
   
24,412
 
Investor relations expenses
   
28,523
   
55,120
   
51,135
   
26,976
 
Other
   
40,895
   
112,890
   
101,972
   
77,696
 
Total expenses
   
2,644,597
   
5,066,450
   
4,991,510
   
3,591,719
 
Net investment income (loss)
   
9,114,999
   
16,591,557
   
15,719,120
   
6,249,696
 
Realized and Unrealized Gain (Loss)
                         
Net realized gain (loss) from:
                         
Investments
   
(22,618
)
 
2,427,886
   
1,769,803
   
12,259
 
Swaps
   
   
(110,570
)
 
(102,819
)
 
(50,337
)
Change in net unrealized appreciation (depreciation) of:
                         
Investments
   
10,106,125
   
15,834,489
   
18,054,694
   
9,536,154
 
Swaps
   
   
187,352
   
197,460
   
94,558
 
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss)
   
10,083,507
   
18,339,157
   
19,919,138
   
9,592,634
 
Net increase (decrease) in net assets applicable to common shares from operations
 
$
19,198,506
 
$
34,930,714
 
$
35,638,258
 
$
15,842,330
 
 
See accompanying notes to financial statements.
 
58
 
Nuveen Investments

 
 

 

Statement of
 
 
Changes in Net Assets
 
   
Arizona
Premium Income (NAZ)
 
Michigan
Quality Income (NUM)
 
     
Year
   
Year
   
Year
   
Year
 
     
Ended
   
Ended
   
Ended
   
Ended
 
     
2/28/15
   
2/28/14
   
2/28/15
   
2/28/14
 
Operations
                         
Net investment income (loss)
 
$
9,114,999
 
$
7,523,999
 
$
16,591,557
 
$
16,610,547
 
Net realized gain (loss) from:
                         
Investments
   
(22,618
)
 
(3,227,541
)
 
2,427,886
   
(820,048
)
Swaps
   
   
   
(110,570
)
 
 
Change in net unrealized appreciation (depreciation) of:
                         
Investments
   
10,106,125
   
(10,251,936
)
 
15,834,489
   
(25,818,635
)
Swaps
   
   
   
187,352
   
 
Net increase (decrease) in net assets applicable to common shares from operations
   
19,198,506
   
(5,955,478
)
 
34,930,714
   
(10,028,136
)
Distributions to Common Shareholders
                         
From net investment income
   
(9,185,193
)
 
(8,031,653
)
 
(17,879,214
)
 
(18,540,700
)
Decrease in net assets applicable to common shares from distributions to common shareholders
   
(9,185,193
)
 
(8,031,653
)
 
(17,879,214
)
 
(18,540,700
)
Capital Share Transactions
                         
Common shares:
                         
Issued in the reorganizations
   
   
108,375,032
   
   
 
Proceeds from shelf offering, net of offering costs
   
   
   
   
 
Net proceeds from shares issued to shareholders due to reinvestment of distributions
   
   
10,916
   
   
 
Cost of shares repurchased and retired
   
   
   
   
(307,413
)
Net increase (decrease) in net assets applicable to common shares from capital share transactions
   
   
108,385,948
   
   
(307,413
)
Net increase (decrease) in net assets applicable to common shares
   
10,013,313
   
94,398,817
   
17,051,500
   
(28,876,249
)
Net assets applicable to common shares at the beginning of period
   
163,634,830
   
69,236,013
   
312,180,386
   
341,056,635
 
Net assets applicable to common shares at the end of period
 
$
173,648,143
 
$
163,634,830
 
$
329,231,886
 
$
312,180,386
 
Undistributed (Over-distribution of) net investment income at the end of period
 
$
1,493,133
 
$
1,622,957
 
$
731,592
 
$
2,107,628
 
 
See accompanying notes to financial statements.

Nuveen Investments
 
59

 
 

 
 
Statement of Changes in Net Assets (continued)

   
Ohio
Quality Income (NUO)
 
Texas
Quality Income (NTX)
 
     
Year
   
Year
   
Year
   
Year
 
     
Ended
   
Ended
   
Ended
   
Ended
 
     
2/28/15
   
2/28/14
   
2/28/15
   
2/28/14
 
Operations
                         
Net investment income (loss)
 
$
15,719,120
 
$
15,293,800
 
$
6,249,696
 
$
6,615,658
 
Net realized gain (loss) from:
                         
Investments
   
1,769,803
   
(1,711,699
)
 
12,259
   
341,993
 
Swaps
   
(102,819
)
 
   
(50,337
)
 
 
Change in net unrealized appreciation (depreciation) of:
                         
Investments
   
18,054,694
   
(25,667,636
)
 
9,536,154
   
(10,506,722
)
Swaps
   
197,460
   
   
94,558
   
 
Net increase (decrease) in net assets applicable to common shares from operations
   
35,638,258
   
(12,085,535
)
 
15,842,330
   
(3,549,071
)
Distributions to Common Shareholders
                         
From net investment income
   
(17,164,296
)
 
(16,998,251
)
 
(6,778,394
)
 
(6,982,757
)
Decrease in net assets applicable to common shares from distributions to common shareholders
   
(17,164,296
)
 
(16,998,251
)
 
(6,778,394
)
 
(6,982,757
)
Capital Share Transactions
                         
Common shares:
                         
Issued in the reorganizations
   
   
152,721,496
   
   
 
Proceeds from shelf offering, net of offering costs
   
   
   
   
156,238
 
Net proceeds from shares issued to shareholders due to reinvestment of distributions
   
   
131,761
   
   
35,861
 
Cost of shares repurchased and retired
   
   
   
   
 
Net increase (decrease) in net assets applicable to common shares from capital share transactions
   
   
152,853,257
   
   
192,099
 
Net increase (decrease) in net assets applicable to common shares
   
18,473,962
   
123,769,471
   
9,063,936
   
(10,339,729
)
Net assets applicable to common shares at the beginning of period
   
296,667,772
   
172,898,301
   
148,580,256
   
158,919,985
 
Net assets applicable to common shares at the end of period
 
$
315,141,734
 
$
296,667,772
 
$
157,644,192
 
$
148,580,256
 
Undistributed (Over-distribution of) net investment income at the end of period
 
$
495,988
 
$
2,297,481
 
$
80,176
 
$
429,631
 
 
See accompanying notes to financial statements.
 
60
 
Nuveen Investments

 
 

 

Statement of
   
 
Cash Flows
Year Ended February 28, 2015
 
     
Arizona
   
Michigan
   
Ohio
   
Texas
 
     
Premium
   
Quality
   
Quality
   
Quality
 
     
Income
   
Income
   
Income
   
Income
 
     
(NAZ
)
 
(NUM
)
 
(NUO
)
 
(NTX
)
Cash Flows from Operating Activities:
                         
Net Increase (Decrease) in Net Assets Applicable to Common Shares from Operations
 
$
19,198,506
 
$
34,930,714
 
$
35,638,258
 
$
15,842,330
 
Adjustments to reconcile the net increase (decrease) in net assets applicable to common shares from operations to net cash provided by (used in) operating activities:
                         
Purchases of investments
   
(34,487,478
)
 
(74,406,401
)
 
(68,770,258
)
 
(27,827,073
)
Proceeds from sales and maturities of investments
   
32,977,140
   
81,820,058
   
77,713,306
   
32,571,648
 
Proceeds from (Payments for) swap contracts, net
   
   
(110,570
)
 
(102,819
)
 
(50,337
)
Investment transaction adjustments, net
   
(3,999
)
 
   
259
   
 
Taxes paid on undistributed capital gains
   
(5,355
)
 
(32
)
 
(612
)
 
(360
)
Amortization (Accretion) of premiums and discounts, net
   
824,163
   
939,159
   
977,634
   
207,720
 
Amortization of deferred offering costs
   
33,697
   
(10,007
)
 
9,848
   
296,092
 
(Increase) Decrease in:
                         
Credit default swap premiums paid
   
   
(904,298
)
 
(884,666
)
 
(419,803
)
Receivable for interest
   
5,361
   
262,727
   
315,352
   
152,445
 
Receivable for investments sold
   
387,273
   
   
   
(3,269,313
)
Other assets
   
(179
)
 
(1,212
)
 
(4,406
)
 
(47
)
Increase (Decrease) in:
                         
Payable for interest
   
(866
)
 
(1,743
)
 
   
 
Payable for investments purchased
   
   
2,796,832
   
(1,969,726
)
 
2,445,855
 
Accrued management fees
   
4,893
   
8,684
   
8,903
   
4,479
 
Accrued Trustees fees
   
(196
)
 
(1,406
)
 
3,985
   
(159
)
Accrued other expenses
   
(85,631
)
 
(1,943
)
 
(31,313
)
 
(9,529
)
Net realized (gain) loss from:
                         
Investments
   
22,618
   
(2,427,886
)
 
(1,769,803
)
 
(12,259
)
Swaps
   
   
110,570
   
102,819
   
50,337
 
Change in net unrealized appreciation (depreciation) of:
                         
Investments
   
(10,106,125
)
 
(15,834,489
)
 
(18,054,694
)
 
(9,536,154
)
Swaps
   
   
(187,352
)
 
(197,460
)
 
(94,558
)
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities
   
8,763,822
   
26,981,405
   
22,984,607
   
10,351,314
 
Cash Flows from Financing Activities:
                         
Increase (Decrease) in:
                         
Floating rate obligations
   
   
   
(8,625,000
)
 
 
Payable for offering costs
   
(107,596
)
 
(109,421
)
 
(65,902
)
 
 
Cash distributions paid to common shareholders
   
(9,174,340
)
 
(17,997,036
)
 
(17,264,943
)
 
(6,795,757
)
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities
   
(9,281,936
)
 
(18,106,457
)
 
(25,955,845
)
 
(6,795,757
)
Net Increase (Decrease) in Cash
   
(518,114
)
 
8,874,948
   
(2,971,238
)
 
3,555,557
 
Cash at the beginning of period
   
1,818,339
   
1,618,219
   
5,847,932
   
429,177
 
Cash at the end of period
 
$
1,300,225
 
$
10,493,167
 
$
2,876,694
 
$
3,984,734
 
                           
     
Arizona
   
Michigan
   
Ohio
   
Texas
 
     
Premium
   
Quality
   
Quality
   
Quality
 
     
Income
   
Income
   
Income
   
Income
 
Supplemental Disclosures of Cash Flow Information
   
(NAZ
)
 
(NUM
)
 
(NUO
)
 
(NTX
)
Cash paid for interest (excluding amortization of offering costs)
 
$
804,927
 
$
1,641,081
 
$
217,731
 
$
1,642,420
 
 
See accompanying notes to financial statements.
 
Nuveen Investments
 
61

 
 

 

Financial
 
 
Highlights
 
Selected data for a common share outstanding throughout each period:

         
Investment Operations
 
Less Distributions
to Common Shareholders
       
Common Share
 
   
Beginning
Common
Share
NAV
 
Net
Investment
Income
(Loss)
 
Net
Realized/
Unrealized
Gain (Loss)
 
Distributions
from Net
Investment
Income to
ARPS
Share-
holders
(a)
Distributions
from Accum-
ulated Net
Realized
Gains to
ARPS
Share-
holders
(a)
Total
 
From
Net
Investment
Income
 
From
Accum-
ulated Net
Realized
Gains
 
Total
 
Discount
per
Share
Repur-
chased
and
Retired
 
Ending
NAV
 
Ending
Share
Price
 
Arizona Premium Income (NAZ)
Year Ended 2/28–2/29:
2015
 
$
14.15
 
$
0.79
 
$
0.87
 
$
 
$
 
$
1.66
 
$
(0.79
)
$
 
$
(0.79
)
$
 
$
15.02
 
$
14.37
 
2014
   
15.47
   
0.55
   
(1.10
)
 
   
   
(0.55
)
 
(0.77
)
 
   
(0.77
)
 
   
14.15
   
12.79
 
2013
   
14.82
   
0.75
   
0.67
   
   
   
1.42
   
(0.77
)
 
   
(0.77
)
 
   
15.47
   
15.70
 
2012
   
13.25
   
0.80
   
1.54
   
(0.01
)
 
   
2.33
   
(0.76
)
 
   
(0.76
)
 
   
14.82
   
14.61
 
2011(f)
   
13.99
   
0.49
   
(0.77
)
 
(0.02
)
 
   
(0.30
)
 
(0.44
)
 
   
(0.44
)
 
   
13.25
   
12.32
 
Year Ended 7/31:
                                                                         
2010
   
12.92
   
0.84
   
0.96
   
(0.03
)
 
   
1.77
   
(0.70
)
 
   
(0.70
)
 
   
13.99
   
13.34
 
                                                                           
Michigan Quality Income (NUM)
Year Ended 2/28–2/29:
2015
   
14.98
   
0.80
   
0.88
   
   
   
1.68
   
(0.86
)
 
   
(0.86
)
 
   
15.80
   
13.85
 
2014
   
16.35
   
0.80
   
(1.28
)
 
   
   
(0.48
)
 
(0.89
)
 
   
(0.89
)
 
*
 
14.98
   
13.45
 
2013
   
15.95
   
0.74
   
0.55
   
   
   
1.29
   
(0.89
)
 
   
(0.89
)
 
   
16.35
   
15.62
 
2012
   
14.18
   
0.89
   
1.75
   
(0.01
)
 
   
2.63
   
(0.86
)
 
   
(0.86
)
 
*
 
15.95
   
15.40
 
2011
   
14.79
   
0.94
   
(0.69
)
 
(0.03
)
 
   
0.22
   
(0.83
)
 
   
(0.83
)
 
*
 
14.18
   
12.75
 
 
(a)
The amounts shown for Auction Rate Preferred Shares (“ARPS”) are based on common share equivalents.
(b)
Total Return Based on Common Share NAV is the combination of changes in common share NAV, reinvested dividend income at NAV and reinvested capital gains distributions at NAV, if any. The last dividend declared in the period, which is typically paid on the first business day of the following month, is assumed to be reinvested at the ending NAV. The actual reinvest price for the last dividend declared in the period may often be based on the Fund’s market price (and not its NAV), and therefore may be different from the price used in the calculation. Total returns are not annualized.
   
 
Total Return Based on Common Share Price is the combination of changes in the market price per share and the effect of reinvested dividend income and reinvested capital gains distributions, if any, at the average price paid per share at the time of reinvestment. The last dividend declared in the period, which is typically paid on the first business day of the following month, is assumed to be reinvested at the ending market price. The actual reinvestment for the last dividend declared in the period may take place over several days, and in some instances may not be based on the market price, so the actual reinvestment price may be different from the price used in the calculation. Total returns are not annualized.
*
Rounds to less than $0.01 per share.
 
62
 
Nuveen Investments

 
 

 

               
Common Share Supplemental Data/
Ratios Applicable to Common Shares
 
                                       
   
Common Share
Total Returns
       
Ratios to Average Net Assets(c)
       
                                       
           
Based
               
Net
       
     
Based
   
on
   
Ending
         
Investment
   
Portfolio
 
     
on
   
Share
   
Net
         
Income
 
Turnover
 
     
NAV
(b)
 
Price
(b)
 
Assets (000
)
 
Expenses
(d)
 
(Loss
)
 
Rate
(e)
                                       
                                       
     
12.01
%
 
18.94
%
$
173,648
   
1.56
%
 
5.37
%
 
13
%
     
(3.40
)
 
(13.52
)
 
163,635
   
2.47
   
4.93
   
14
 
     
9.77
   
13.02
   
69,236
   
1.80
   
4.94
   
10
 
     
18.08
   
25.48
   
66,268
   
1.52
   
5.73
   
7
 
     
(2.23
)
 
(4.55
)
 
59,256
   
1.19
**   
6.11
**   
5
 
                                       
     
13.94
   
14.47
   
62,549
   
1.21
   
6.13
   
8
 
                                       
                                       
     
11.45
   
9.48
   
329,232
   
1.57
   
5.14
   
15
 
     
(2.76
)
 
(8.00
)
 
312,180
   
1.95
   
5.32
   
15
 
     
8.27
   
7.30
   
341,057
   
1.84
   
5.09
   
12
 
     
19.11
   
28.44
   
184,270
   
1.56
   
5.97
   
14
 
     
1.39
   
4.69
   
163,876
   
1.18
   
6.37
   
6
 
 
(c)
Ratios do not reflect the effect of dividend payments to ARPS shareholders, where applicable; Net Investment Income (Loss) ratios reflect income earned and expenses incurred on assets attributable to ARPS, MTP Shares and/or VMTP Shares, where applicable.
(d)
The expense ratios reflect, among other things, all interest expense and other costs related to MTP Shares, VMTP Shares and/or the interest expense deemed to have been paid by the Fund on the floating rate certificates issued by the special purpose trusts for the self-deposited inverse floaters held by the Fund, where applicable, each as described in Note 1 –General Information and Significant Accounting Policies, MuniFund Term Preferred Shares and Variable Rate MuniFund Term Preferred Shares and Note 3 – Portfolio Securities and Investments in Derivatives, Inverse Floating Rate Securities, respectively, as follows:
 
Arizona Premium Income (NAZ)
 
Year Ended 2/28–2/29:
 
2015
0.50%
2014
1.32
2013
0.57
2012
0.35
2011(f)
Year Ended 7/31:
 
2010
   
Michigan Quality Income (NUM)
 
Year Ended 2/28–2/29:
 
2015
0.53%
2014
0.84
2013
0.70
2012
0.46
2011
0.02
 
(e)
Portfolio Turnover Rate is calculated based on the lesser of long-term purchases or sales (as disclosed in Note 5 – Investment Transactions) divided by the average long-term market value during the period.
(f)
For the seven months ended February 28, 2011.
**
Annualized.
 
See accompanying notes to financial statements.
 
Nuveen Investments
 
63

 
 

 
 
Financial Highlights (continued)
 
Selected data for a common share outstanding throughout each period:

         
Investment Operations
 
Less Distributions
to Common Shareholders
       
Common Share
 
   
Beginning
Common
Share
NAV
 
Net
Investment
Income
(Loss)
 
Net
Realized/
Unrealized
Gain (Loss)
 
Distributions
from Net
Investment
Income to
ARPS
Share-
holders
(a)
Distributions
from Accum-
ulated Net
Realized
Gains to
ARPS
Share-
holders
(a)
Total
 
From
Net
Investment
Income
 
From
Accum-
ulated Net
Realized
Gains
 
Total
 
Shelf
Offering
Costs
 
Premium
Per
Share
Sold
through
Shelf
Offering
 
Ending
NAV
 
Ending
Share
Price
 
Ohio Quality Income (NUO)
Year Ended 2/28–2/29:
2015
 
$
16.02
 
$
0.85
 
$
1.07
 
$
 
$
 
$
1.92
 
$
(0.93
)
$
 
$
(0.93
)
$
 
$
 
$
17.01
 
$
15.40
 
2014
   
17.64
   
0.76
   
(1.39
)
 
   
   
(0.63
)
 
(0.99
)
 
   
(0.99
)
 
   
   
16.02
   
14.75
 
2013
   
17.17
   
0.89
   
0.54
   
   
   
1.43
   
(0.96
)
 
   
(0.96
)
 
   
   
17.64
   
17.79
 
2012
   
15.44
   
0.99
   
1.68
   
(0.01
)
 
   
2.66
   
(0.93
)
 
   
(0.93
)
 
   
   
17.17
   
16.88
 
2011
   
16.15
   
1.01
   
(0.79
)
 
(0.03
)
 
   
0.19
   
(0.90
)
 
   
(0.90
)
 
   
   
15.44
   
14.85
 
 
Texas Quality Income (NTX)
Year Ended 2/28–2/29:
2015
   
14.82
   
0.62
   
0.96
   
   
   
1.58
   
(0.68
)
 
   
(0.68
)
 
   
   
15.72
   
14.35
 
2014
   
15.87
   
0.66
   
(1.01
)
 
   
   
(0.35
)
 
(0.70
)
 
   
(0.70
)
 
*
 
*
 
14.82
   
13.54
 
2013
   
15.46
   
0.68
   
0.47
   
   
   
1.15
   
(0.77
)
 
   
(0.77
)
 
(0.01
)
 
0.04
   
15.87
   
16.00
 
2012
   
14.12
   
0.75
   
1.48
   
   
   
2.23
   
(0.86
)
 
(.03
)
 
(0.89
)
 
   
   
15.46
   
16.31
 
2011(f)
   
15.01
   
0.48
   
(0.85
)
 
(0.01
)
 
   
(0.38
)
 
(0.50
)
 
(.01
)
 
(0.51
)
 
   
   
14.12
   
15.19
 
Year Ended 7/31:
2010
   
13.84
   
0.94
   
1.08
   
(0.03
)
 
 
1.99
   
(0.81
)
 
(.01
)
 
(0.82
)
 
   
   
15.01
   
16.92
 
 
(a)
The amounts shown for Auction Rate Preferred Shares (“ARPS”) are based on common share equivalents.
(b)
Total Return Based on Common Share NAV is the combination of changes in common share NAV, reinvested dividend income at NAV and reinvested capital gains distributions at NAV, if any. The last dividend declared in the period, which is typically paid on the first business day of the following month, is assumed to be reinvested at the ending NAV. The actual reinvest price for the last dividend declared in the period may often be based on the Fund’s market price (and not its NAV), and therefore may be different from the price used in the calculation. Total returns are not annualized.
   
 
Total Return Based on Common Share Price is the combination of changes in the market price per share and the effect of reinvested dividend income and reinvested capital gains distributions, if any, at the average price paid per share at the time of reinvestment. The last dividend declared in the period, which is typically paid on the first business day of the following month, is assumed to be reinvested at the ending market price. The actual reinvestment for the last dividend declared in the period may take place over several days, and in some instances may not be based on the market price, so the actual reinvestment price may be different from the price used in the calculation. Total returns are not annualized.
*
Rounds to less than $0.01 per share.
 
64
 
Nuveen Investments

 
 

 
 
       
Common Share Supplemental Data/
Ratios Applicable to Common Shares
 
   
Common Share
Total Returns
       
Ratios to Average Net Assets(c)
       
                                       
   
Based
on
NAV
(b)
Based
on
Share
Price
(b)
Ending
Net
Assets (000)
 
Expenses
(d)
Net
Investment
Income
(Loss)
 
Portfolio
Turnover
Rate
(e)
                                       
                                       
     
12.23
%
 
10.79
%
$
315,142
   
1.62
%
 
5.10
%
 
15
%
     
(3.38
)
 
(11.39
)
 
296,668
   
2.15
   
5.45
   
13
 
     
8.53
   
11.27
   
172,898
   
1.76
   
5.14
   
13
 
     
17.73
   
20.55
   
167,709
   
1.50
   
6.10
   
10
 
     
1.09
   
0.91
   
150,555
   
1.14
   
6.32
   
14
 
                                       
                                       
     
10.81
   
11.07
   
157,644
   
2.33
   
4.05
   
12
 
     
(2.11
)
 
(11.03
)
 
148,580
   
2.49
   
4.46
   
13
 
     
7.80
   
2.97
   
158,920
   
2.38
   
4.33
   
12
 
     
16.23
   
13.81
   
148,222
   
2.48
   
5.10
   
9
 
     
(2.61
)
 
(7.15
)
 
134,850
   
1.92
**   
5.69
**   
10
 
                                       
     
14.71
   
20.92
   
143,080
   
1.19
   
6.42
   
6
 
 
(c)
Ratios do not reflect the effect of dividend payments to ARPS shareholders, where applicable; Net Investment Income (Loss) ratios reflect income earned and expenses incurred on assets attributable to ARPS, MTP Shares, VMTP Shares and/or VRDP Shares, where applicable.
(d)
The expense ratios reflect, among other things, all interest expense and other costs related to MTP Shares, VMTP Shares, VRDP Shares and/or the interest expense deemed to have been paid by the Fund on the floating rate certificates issued by the special purpose trusts for the self-deposited inverse floaters held by the Fund, where applicable, each as described in Note 1 – General Information and Significant Accounting Policies, MuniFund Term Preferred Shares, Variable Rate MuniFund Term Preferred Shares and Variable Rate Demand Preferred Shares and Note 3 – Portfolio Securities and Investments in Derivatives, Inverse Floating Rate Securities, respectively, as follows:
 
Ohio Quality Income (NUO)
       
Year Ended 2/28–2/29:
       
2015
   
0.57
%
2014
   
1.05
 
2013
   
0.61
 
2012
   
0.40
 
2011
   
 
         
Texas Quality Income (NTX)
       
Year Ended 2/28–2/29:
       
2015
   
1.26
%
2014
   
1.31
 
2013
   
1.27
 
2012
   
1.37
 
2011(f)
   
0.80
**
Year Ended 7/31:
       
2010
   
0.02
 
 
(e)
Portfolio Turnover Rate is calculated based on the lesser of long-term purchases or sales (as disclosed in Note 5 – Investment Transactions) divided by the average long-term market value during the period.
(f)
For the seven months ended February 28, 2011.
**
Annualized.
 
See accompanying notes to financial statements.

Nuveen Investments
 
65

 
 

 
 
Financial Highlights (continued)

   
ARPS at the End of Period
 
MTP Shares
at the End of Period (a)
 
VMTP Shares
at the End of Period
 
MTP and VMTP
Shares at the
End of Period
 
   
Aggregate
Amount
Outstanding
(000)
 
Asset
Coverage
Per $25,000
Share
 
Aggregate
Amount
Outstanding
(000)
 
Asset
Coverage
Per $10
Share
 
Aggregate
Amount
Outstanding
(000)
 
Asset
Coverage
Per $100,000
Share
 
Asset
Coverage
Per $1
Liquidation
Preference
 
Arizona Premium Income (NAZ)
Year Ended 2/28–2/29:
2015
 
$
 
$
 
$
 
$
 
$
79,000
 
$
319,808
 
$
 
2014
   
   
   
   
   
79,000
   
307,133
   
 
2013
   
   
   
   
   
28,000
   
347,271
   
 
2012
   
   
   
   
   
28,000
   
336,672
   
 
2011(b)
   
27,875
   
78,144
   
   
   
   
   
 
Year Ended 7/31:
                                           
2010
   
27,875
   
81,097
   
   
   
   
   
 
                                             
Michigan Quality Income (NUM)
Year Ended 2/28–2/29:
2015
   
   
   
   
   
159,000
   
307,064
   
 
2014
   
   
   
   
   
159,000
   
296,340
   
 
2013
   
   
   
16,313
   
31.57
   
141,800
   
315,704
   
3.16
 
2012
   
   
   
   
   
87,900
   
309,636
   
 
2011
   
87,325
   
71,915
   
   
   
   
   
 
 
(a)
The Ending and Average Market Value Per Share for each Series of the Fund’s MTP Shares were as follows:
 
     
2015
   
2014
   
2013
 
Arizona Premium Income (NAZ)
                   
Series 2015 (NAZ PRC)
                   
Ending Market Value per Share
 
$
 
$
 
$
 
Average Market Value per Share
   
   
10.02
 
 
Series 2016 (NAZ PRD)
                   
Ending Market Value per Share
   
   
   
 
Average Market Value per Share
   
   
10.11
 
 
                     
Michigan Quality Income (NUM)
                   
Series 2015 (NUM PRC)
                   
Ending Market Value per Share
   
   
   
10.08
 
Average Market Value per Share
   
   
10.02
△△△
 
10.06
△△
 
(b)
For the seven months ended February 28, 2011.
For the period April 8, 2013 (effective date of the reorganizations) through December 20, 2013.
△△
For the period January 7, 2013 (effective date of the reorganizations) through February 28, 2013.
△△△
For the period March 1, 2013 through December 20, 2013.
 
See accompanying notes to financial statements.
 
66
 
Nuveen Investments

 
 

 
 
   
ARPS at the End of Period
 
MTP Shares
at the End of Period (a)
 
VMTP Shares
at the End of Period
 
VRDP Shares
at the End of Period
 
   
Aggregate
Amount
Outstanding
(000)
 
Asset
Coverage
Per $25,000
Share
 
Aggregate
Amount
Outstanding
(000)
 
Asset
Coverage
Per $10
Share
 
Aggregate
Amount
Outstanding
(000)
 
Asset
Coverage
Per $100,000
Share
 
Aggregate
Amount
Outstanding
(000)
 
Asset
Coverage
Per $100,000
Share
 
Ohio Quality Income (NUO)
Year Ended 2/28–2/29:
2015
 
$
 
$
 
$
 
$
 
$
 
$
 
$
148,000
 
$
312,934
 
2014
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
148,000
   
300,451
 
2013
   
   
   
   
   
73,500
   
335,236
   
   
 
2012
   
   
   
   
   
73,500
   
328,176
   
   
 
2011
   
73,000
   
76,560
   
   
   
   
   
   
 
                                                   
Texas Quality Income (NTX)
Year Ended 2/28–2/29:
2015
   
   
   
70,920
   
32.23
   
   
   
   
 
2014
   
   
   
70,920
   
30.95
   
   
   
   
 
2013
   
   
   
70,920
   
32.41
   
   
   
   
 
2012
   
   
   
70,920
   
30.90
   
   
   
   
 
2011(b)
   
   
   
70,920
   
29.01
   
   
   
   
 
Year Ended 7/31:
2010
   
65,050
   
79,988
   
   
   
   
   
   
 
 
(a)
The Ending and Average Market Value Per Share for each Series of the Fund’s MTP Shares were as follows:
 
     
2015
   
2014
   
2013
   
2012
   
2011
 
Ohio Quality Income (NUO)
                               
Series 2014 (NUO PRACL)
                               
Ending Market Value per Share
 
$
 
$
 
$
 
$
 
$
 
Average Market Value per Share
   
   
10.01
Ω
 
   
   
 
Series 2015 (NUO PRCCL)
                               
Ending Market Value per Share
   
   
   
   
   
 
Average Market Value per Share
   
   
10.03
Ω
 
   
   
 
Series 2016 (NUO PRDCL)
                               
Ending Market Value per Share
   
   
   
   
   
 
Average Market Value per Share
   
   
10.06
Ω
 
   
   
 
                                 
Texas Quality Income (NTX)
                               
Series 2015 (NTX PRCCL)
                               
Ending Market Value per Share
   
10.02
   
10.03
   
10.04
   
10.05
   
9.85
 
Average Market Value per Share
   
10.04
   
10.04
   
10.06
   
9.97
   
9.86
ΩΩ
 
(b)
For the seven months ended February 28, 2011.
Ω
For the period April 8, 2013 (effective date of the reorganization) through October 7, 2013.
ΩΩ
For the period November 2, 2010 (first issuance date of shares) through February 28, 2011.
 
See accompanying notes to financial statements.

Nuveen Investments
 
67

 
 

 
 
Notes to Financial Statements
 
1. General Information and Significant Accounting Policies
 
General Information
 
Fund Information
The state funds covered in this report and their corresponding New York Stock Exchange (“NYSE”) symbols are as follows (each a “Fund” and collectively, the “Funds”):
 
• Nuveen Arizona Premium Income Municipal Fund (NAZ) (“Arizona Premium Income (NAZ)”)
• Nuveen Michigan Quality Income Municipal Fund (NUM) (“Michigan Quality Income (NUM)”)
• Nuveen Ohio Quality Income Municipal Fund (NUO) (“Ohio Quality Income (NUO)”)
• Nuveen Texas Quality Income Municipal Fund (NTX) (“Texas Quality Income (NTX)”)
 
The Funds are registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended, as diversified, closed-end management investment companies. Arizona Premium Income (NAZ), Michigan Quality Income (NUM) and Ohio Quality Income (NUO) were organized as Massachusetts business trusts on April 8, 2013, January 7, 2013 and April 8, 2013, respectively (previously organized as Minnesota trusts on January 23, 1991, July 25, 1991 and October 17, 1991, respectively). Texas Quality Income (NTX) was organized as a Massachusetts business trust on July 26, 1991.
 
The end of the reporting period for the Funds is February 28, 2015, and the period covered by these Notes to Financial Statements is the fiscal year ended February 28, 2015 (“the current fiscal period”).
 
Investment Adviser
The Funds’ investment adviser is Nuveen Fund Advisors, LLC (the “Adviser”), a wholly-owned subsidiary of Nuveen Investments, Inc. (“Nuveen”). The Adviser is responsible for each Fund’s overall investment strategy and asset allocation decisions. The Adviser has entered into sub-advisory agreements with Nuveen Asset Management, LLC (the “Sub-Adviser”), a subsidiary of the Adviser, under which the Sub-Adviser manages the investment portfolios of the Funds.
 
Investment Objectives and Principal Investment Strategies
Each Fund seeks to provide current income exempt from both regular federal and designated state income taxes by investing primarily in a portfolio of municipal obligations issued by state and local government authorities within a single state or certain U.S. territories.
 
Significant Accounting Policies
Each Fund is an investment company and follows accounting and reporting guidance under Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) Topic 946 “Financial Services – Investment Companies.” The following is a summary of significant accounting policies followed by the Funds in the preparation of their financial statements in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“U.S. GAAP”).
 
Investment Transactions
Investment transactions are recorded on a trade date basis. Realized gains and losses from investment transactions are determined on the specific identification method, which is the same basis used for federal income tax purposes. Investments purchased on a when-issued/delayed delivery basis may have extended settlement periods. Any investments so purchased are subject to market fluctuation during this period. The Funds have instructed the custodian to earmark securities in the Funds’ portfolios with a current value at least equal to the amount of the when-issued/delayed delivery purchase commitments.
 
As of the end of the reporting period, the Funds’ outstanding when-issued/delayed delivery purchase commitments were as follows:

     
Arizona
   
Michigan
   
Ohio
   
Texas
 
     
Premium
   
Quality
   
Quality
   
Quality
 
     
Income
   
Income
   
Income
   
Income
 
     
(NAZ
)
 
(NUM
)
 
(NUO
)
 
(NTX
)
Outstanding when-issued/delayed delivery purchase commitments
 
$
 
$
662,239
 
$
 
$
5,578,330
 
 
68
 
Nuveen Investments

 
 

 
 
Investment Income
Investment income, which reflects the amortization of premiums and accretion of discounts for financial reporting purposes, is recorded on an accrual basis. Investment income also reflects paydown gains and losses, if any.
 
Professional Fees
Professional fees presented on the Statement of Operations consist of legal fees incurred in the normal course of operations, audit fees, tax consulting fees and, in some cases, workout expenditures. Workout expenditures are incurred in an attempt to protect or enhance an investment or to pursue other claims or legal actions on behalf of Fund shareholders. If a refund is received for workout expenditures paid in a prior reporting period, such amounts will be recognized as “Legal fee refund” on the Statement of Operations.
 
Dividends and Distributions to Common Shareholders
Dividends from net investment income are declared monthly. Net realized capital gains and/or market discount from investment transactions, if any, are distributed to shareholders at least annually. Furthermore, capital gains are distributed only to the extent they exceed available capital loss carryforwards.
 
Distributions to common shareholders of net investment income, net realized capital gains and/or market discount, if any, are recorded on the ex-dividend date. The amount and timing of distributions are determined in accordance with federal corporate income tax regulations, which may differ from U.S. GAAP.
 
MuniFund Term Preferred Shares
Texas Quality Income (NTX) has issued and outstanding MuniFund Term Preferred (“MTP”) Shares, with a $10 liquidation value per share. The Fund’s MTP Shares were issued in one Series and trade on the NYSE.
 
As of the end of the reporting period, details of Texas Quality Income’s (NTX) MTP Shares outstanding were as follows:

                     
Shares
       
                     
Outstanding
       
           
NYSE
   
Shares
 
at $10 Per Share
   
Annual
 
Fund
   
Series
   
Ticker
 
Outstanding
 
Liquidation Value
 
Dividend Rate
 
Texas Quality Income (NTX)
   
2015
   
NTX PRCCL
   
7,092,000
 
$
70,920,000
   
2.30
%
 
The Fund is obligated to redeem its MTP Shares by the date as specified in its offering document (“Term Redemption Date”), unless earlier redeemed or repurchased by the Fund. MTP Shares are subject to optional and mandatory redemption in certain circumstances. MTP Shares were subject to redemption at the option of the Fund (“Optional Redemption Date”), subject to a payment of premium for one year following the Optional Redemption Date (“Premium Expiration Date”), and at par thereafter. MTP Shares also will be subject to redemption, at the option of the Fund, at par in the event of certain changes in the credit rating of the MTP Shares. The Fund may be obligated to redeem certain of the MTP Shares if the Fund fails to maintain certain asset coverage and leverage ratio requirements and such failures are not cured by the applicable cure date. The redemption price per share is equal to the sum of the liquidation value per share plus any accumulated but unpaid dividends. The Term Redemption Date, Optional Redemption Date and Premium Expiration Date for the Fund’s series of MTP Shares are as follows:
 
           
NYSE
   
Term
   
Optional
   
Premium
 
Fund
   
Series
   
Ticker
  Redemption Date   Redemption Date   Expiration Date  
Texas Quality Income (NTX)
   
2015
   
NTX PRCCL
   
December 1, 2015
   
December 1, 2011
   
November 30, 2012
 
 
The average liquidation value for all series of MTP Shares outstanding for the Fund during the current fiscal period, was as follows:
 
     
Texas
 
     
Quality
 
     
Income
 
     
(NTX
)
Average liquidation value of MTP Shares outstanding
 
$
70,920,000
 
 
For financial reporting purposes, the liquidation value of MTP Shares is recorded as a liability and recognized as “MuniFund Term Preferred (“MTP”) Shares, at liquidation value” on the Statement of Assets and Liabilities. Dividends on MTP Shares, which are recognized as interest expense for financial reporting purposes, are paid monthly at a fixed annual rate, subject to adjustments in certain circumstances. Unpaid dividends on MTP Shares are recognized as a component of “Interest payable” on the Statement of Assets and Liabilities. Dividends accrued on MTP Shares are recognized as a component of “Interest expense and amortization of offering costs” on the Statement of Operations. Costs incurred by the Funds in connection with their offerings of MTP Shares were recorded as a deferred charge, which are amortized over the life of the shares and are recognized as components of “Deferred offering costs” on the Statement of Assets and Liabilities and “Interest expense and amortization of offering costs” on the Statement of Operations.

Nuveen Investments
 
69

 
 

 
 
Notes to Financial Statements (continued)
 
Variable Rate MuniFund Term Preferred Shares
The following Funds have issued and outstanding Variable Rate MuniFund Term Preferred (“VMTP”) Shares, with a $100,000 liquidation value per share. VMTP Shares are issued via private placement and are not publicly available.
 
As of the end of the reporting period, VMTP Shares outstanding, at liquidation value, for each Fund were as follows:

               
Shares
 
               
Outstanding
 
           
Shares
 
at $100,000 Per Share
 
Fund
   
Series
 
Outstanding
 
Liquidation Value
 
Arizona Premium Income (NAZ)
   
2016
   
790
 
$
79,000,000
 
Michigan Quality Income (NUM)
   
2016
   
1,590
 
$
159,000,000
 
 
Each Fund is obligated to redeem its VMTP Shares by the date as specified in its offering document (“Term Redemption Date”), unless earlier redeemed or repurchased by the Fund. VMTP Shares are subject to optional and mandatory redemption in certain circumstances. The VMTP Shares are subject to redemption at the option of each Fund (“Optional Redemption Date”), subject to payment of premium for one year following the date of issuance (“Premium Expiration Date”), and at par thereafter. Each Fund may be obligated to redeem certain of the VMTP Shares if the Fund fails to maintain certain asset coverage and leverage ratio requirements and such failures are not cured by the applicable cure date. The redemption price per share is equal to the sum of the liquidation value per share plus any accumulated but unpaid dividends. The Term Redemption Date, Optional Redemption Date and Premium Expiration Date for each Fund’s VMTP Shares are as follows:

                           
           
Term
   
Optional
   
Premium
 
Fund
   
Series
 
Redemption Date
 
Redemption Date
 
Expiration Date
 
Arizona Premium Income (NAZ)
   
2016
   
December 30, 2016
   
January 1, 2015
   
December 31, 2014
 
Michigan Quality Income (NUM)
   
2016
   
December 30, 2016
   
January 1, 2015
   
December 31, 2014
 
 
The average liquidation value of VMTP Shares outstanding and annualized dividend rate for each Fund during the current fiscal period, were as follows:
               
     
Arizona
   
Michigan
 
     
Premium
   
Quality
 
     
Income
   
Income
 
     
(NAZ
)
 
(NUM
)
Average liquidation value of VMTP Shares outstanding
 
$
79,000,000
 
$
159,000,000
 
Annualized dividend rate
   
1.00
%
 
1.00
%
 
VMTP Shares generally do not trade, and market quotations are generally not available. VMTP Shares are short-term or short/intermediate-term instruments that pay a variable dividend rate tied to a short-term index, plus an additional fixed “spread” amount established at the time of issuance. The fair value of VMTP Shares is expected to be approximately their liquidation par value so long as the fixed “spread” on the VMTP Shares remains roughly in line with the “spread” rates being demanded by investors on instruments having similar terms in the current market environment. In present market conditions, the Funds’ Adviser has determined that the fair value of VMTP Shares is their liquidation value, but their fair value could vary if market conditions change materially. For financial reporting purposes, the liquidation value of VMTP Shares is a liability and is recognized as “Variable Rate MuniFund Term Preferred (“VMTP”) Shares, at liquidation value” on the Statement of Assets and Liabilities.
 
Dividends on the VMTP Shares (which are treated as interest payments for financial reporting purposes) are set weekly. Unpaid dividends on VMTP Shares are recognized as a component of “Interest payable” on the Statement of Assets and Liabilities. Dividends accrued on VMTP Shares are recognized as a component of “Interest expense and amortization of offering costs” on the Statement of Operations.
 
Costs incurred by the Funds in connection with their offerings of VMTP Shares were recorded as a deferred charge, which are amortized over the life of the shares and are recognized as components of “Deferred offering costs” on the Statement of Assets and Liabilities and “Interest expense and amortization of offering costs” on the Statement of Operations.
 
Variable Rate Demand Preferred Shares
Ohio Quality Income (NUO) has issued and outstanding Variable Rate Demand Preferred (“VRDP”) Shares, with a $100,000 liquidation value per share. VRDP Shares are issued via private placement and are not publicly available.

70
 
Nuveen Investments

 
 

 
 
As of the end of the reporting period, details of the Fund’s VRDP Shares outstanding were as follows:
                           
               
Shares
       
               
Outstanding
       
         
Shares
 
at $100,000 Per Share
       
Fund
   
Series
 
Outstanding
 
Liquidation Value
   
Maturity
 
Ohio Quality Income (NUO)
   
1
   
1,480
 
$
148,000,000
   
September 1, 2043
 
 
VRDP Shares include a liquidity feature that allows VRDP shareholders to have their shares purchased by a liquidity provider with whom the Fund has contracted in the event that purchase orders for VRDP Shares in a remarketing are not sufficient in number to be matched with the sale orders in that remarketing. The Fund is required to redeem any VRDP Shares that are still owned by the liquidity provider after six months of continuous, unsuccessful remarketing. The Fund pays an annual remarketing fee of 0.10% on the aggregate principal amount of all VRDP Shares outstanding. The Fund’s VRDP Shares have successfully remarketed since issuance.
 
Dividends on the VRDP Shares (which are treated as interest payments for financial reporting purposes) are set weekly at a rate established by a remarketing agent; therefore, the market value of the VRDP Shares is expected to approximate its liquidation value. If remarketings for VRDP Shares are continuously unsuccessful for six months, the maximum rate is designed to escalate according to a specified schedule in order to enhance the remarketing agent’s ability to successfully remarket the VRDP Shares.
 
Subject to certain conditions, VRDP Shares may be redeemed, in whole or in part, at any time at the option of the Fund. The Fund may also redeem certain of the VRDP Shares if the Fund fails to maintain certain asset coverage requirements and such failures are not cured by the applicable cure date. The redemption price per share is equal to the sum of the liquidation value per share plus any accumulated but unpaid dividends.
 
The average liquidation value of VRDP Shares outstanding and annualized dividend rate for the Fund during the current fiscal period were as follows:
         
     
Ohio
 
     
Quality
 
     
Income
 
     
(NUO
)
Average liquidation value of VRDP Shares outstanding
 
$
148,000,000
 
Annualized dividend rate
   
0.14
%
 
For financial reporting purposes, the liquidation value of VRDP Shares is a liability and is recognized as “Variable Rate Demand Preferred (“VRDP”) Shares, at liquidation value” on the Statement of Assets and Liabilities. Unpaid dividends on VRDP Shares are recognized as a component of “Interest payable” on the Statement of Assets and Liabilities, when applicable. Dividends accrued on VRDP Shares are recognized as a component of “Interest expense and amortization of offering costs” on the Statement of Operations. Costs incurred by the Fund in connection with its offerings of VRDP Shares were recorded as a deferred charge, which are being amortized over the life of the shares and are recognized as a component of “Deferred offering costs” on the Statement of Assets and Liabilities and “Interest expense and amortization of offerings costs” on the Statement of Operations. In addition to interest expense, the Fund also pays a per annum liquidity fee to the liquidity provider, as well as a remarketing fee, which are recognized as “Liquidity fees” and “Remarketing fees,” respectively, on the Statement of Operations.
 
Common Shares Equity Shelf Programs and Offering Costs
During prior reporting periods Texas Quality Income (NTX) filed a registration statement with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) authorizing the Fund to issue additional common shares through an ongoing equity shelf program (“Shelf Offering”, which became effective with the SEC during prior fiscal periods.).
 
Under the Shelf Offering, the Fund, subject to market conditions, may raise additional equity capital from time to time in varying amounts and offering methods at a net price at or above the Fund’s net asset value (“NAV”) per common share.
 
Common shares authorized, common shares issued and offering proceeds, net of offering costs under the Fund’s Shelf Offering during the Funds’ current and prior fiscal period were as follows:
               
   
Texas Quality
 
   
Income (NTX)
 
     
Year
   
Year
 
     
Ended
   
Ended
 
     
2/28/15
   
2/28/14
 
Common shares authorized
   
950,000
   
950,000
 
Common shares issued
   
   
10,120
 
Offering proceeds, net of offering costs
 
$
 
$
156,238
 
 
Nuveen Investments
 
71

 
 

 
 
Notes to Financial Statements (continued)
 
As of June 30, 2014, the Fund’s shelf offering registration statement is no longer effective. Therefore, the Fund may not issue additional common shares under their equity shelf program until a new registration statement is filed and declared effective by the SEC.
 
Costs incurred by the Fund in connection with its Shelf Offering are recorded as a deferred charge and recognized as a component of “Deferred offering costs” on the Statement of Assets and Liabilities. The deferred asset is reduced during the one-year period that additional shares are sold by reducing the proceeds from such sales and is recognized as a component of “Proceeds from shelf offering, net of offering costs” on the Statement of Changes in Net Assets, when applicable. At the end of the one-year life of the Shelf Offering period, any remaining deferred charges will be expensed accordingly and recognized as a component of “Other expenses” on the Statement of Operations. Any additional costs the Fund may incur in connection with its Shelf Offering are expensed as incurred and recognized as a component of “Proceeds from shelf offering, net of offering costs” on the Statement of Changes in Net Assets, when applicable.
 
Indemnifications
Under the Funds’ organizational documents, their officers and trustees are indemnified against certain liabilities arising out of the performance of their duties to the Funds. In addition, in the normal course of business, the Funds enter into contracts that provide general indemnifications to other parties. The Funds’ maximum exposure under these arrangements is unknown as this would involve future claims that may be made against the Funds that have not yet occurred. However, the Funds have not had prior claims or losses pursuant to these contracts and expect the risk of loss to be remote.
 
Netting Agreements
In the ordinary course of business, the Funds may enter into transactions subject to enforceable International Swaps and Derivative Association, Inc. (“ISDA”) master agreements or other similar arrangements (“netting agreements”). Generally, the right to offset in netting agreements allows each Fund to offset any exposure to a specific counterparty with any collateral received or delivered to that counterparty based on the terms of the agreements. Generally, each Fund manages its cash collateral and securities collateral on a counterparty basis.
 
The Funds’ investments subject to netting agreements as of the end of the reporting period, if any, are further described in Note 3 – Portfolio Securities and Investments in Derivatives.
 
Use of Estimates
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of increases and decreases in net assets applicable to common shares from operations during the reporting period. Actual results may differ from those estimates.
 
2. Investment Valuation and Fair Value Measurements
The fair valuation input levels as described below are for fair value measurement purposes.
 
Fair value is defined as the price that would be received upon selling an investment or transferring a liability in an orderly transaction to an independent buyer in the principal or most advantageous market for the investment. A three-tier hierarchy is used to maximize the use of observable market data and minimize the use of unobservable inputs and to establish classification of fair value measurements for disclosure purposes. Observable inputs reflect the assumptions market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability. Observable inputs are based on market data obtained from sources independent of the reporting entity. Unobservable inputs reflect the reporting entity’s own assumptions about the assumptions market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability. Unobservable inputs are based on the best information available in the circumstances. The following is a summary of the three-tiered hierarchy of valuation input levels.
   
Level 1 –  
Inputs are unadjusted and prices are determined using quoted prices in active markets for identical securities.
   
Level 2 –  
Prices are determined using other significant observable inputs (including quoted prices for similar securities, interest rates, prepayment speeds, credit risk, etc.).
   
Level 3 –  
Prices are determined using significant unobservable inputs (including management’s assumptions in determining the fair value of investments).
 
Prices of fixed income securities are provided by a pricing service approved by the Funds’ Board of Trustees (the “Board”). The pricing service establishes a security’s fair value using methods that may include consideration of the following: yields or prices of investments of comparable quality, type of issue, coupon, maturity and rating, market quotes or indications of value from security dealers, evaluations of anticipated cash flows or collateral, general market conditions and other information and analysis, including the obligor’s credit characteristics considered relevant. These securities are generally classified as Level 2. In pricing certain securities, particularly less liquid and lower quality securities, the pricing service may consider information about a security, its issuer or market activity provided by the Adviser. These securities are generally classified as Level 2 or Level 3 depending on the priority of the significant inputs.
 
Prices of swap contracts are also provided by a pricing service approved by the Board using the same methods as described above and are generally classified as Level 2.
 
Certain securities may not be able to be priced by the pre-established pricing methods as described above. Such securities may be valued by the Board and/or its appointee at fair value. These securities generally include, but are not limited to, restricted securities (securities which may not be publicly sold without registration under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended) for which a pricing service is unable to provide a market price;

72
 
Nuveen Investments

 
 

 
 
securities whose trading has been formally suspended; debt securities that have gone into default and for which there is no current market quotation; a security whose market price is not available from a pre-established pricing source; a security with respect to which an event has occurred that is likely to materially affect the value of the security after the market has closed but before the calculation of a Fund’s NAV (as may be the case in non-U.S. markets on which the security is primarily traded) or make it difficult or impossible to obtain a reliable market quotation; and a security whose price, as provided by the pricing service, is not deemed to reflect the security’s fair value. As a general principle, the fair value of a security would appear to be the amount that the owner might reasonably expect to receive for it in a current sale. A variety of factors may be considered in determining the fair value of such securities, which may include consideration of the following: yields or prices of investments of comparable quality, type of issue, coupon, maturity and rating, market quotes or indications of value from security dealers, evaluations of anticipated cash flows or collateral, general market conditions and other information and analysis, including the obligor’s credit characteristics considered relevant. These securities are generally classified as Level 2 or Level 3 depending on the priority of the significant inputs. Regardless of the method employed to value a particular security, all valuations are subject to review by the Board and/or its appointee.
 
The inputs or methodologies used for valuing securities are not an indication of the risks associated with investing in those securities. The following is a summary of each Fund’s fair value measurements as of the end of the reporting period:

Arizona Premium Income (NAZ)
   
Level 1
   
Level 2
   
Level 3
   
Total
 
Long-Term Investments*:
                         
Municipal Bonds
 
$
 
$
252,613,261
 
$
 
$
252,613,261
 
                           
Michigan Quality Income (NUM)
                         
Long-Term Investments*:
                         
Municipal Bonds
 
$
 
$
481,664,022
 
$
 
$
481,664,022
 
Investments in Derivatives:
                         
Credit Default Swaps**
   
   
187,352
   
   
187,352
 
Total
 
$
 
$
481,851,374
 
$
 
$
481,851,374
 
                           
Ohio Quality Income (NUO)
                         
Long-Term Investments*:
                         
Municipal Bonds
 
$
 
$
455,253,839
 
$
 
$
455,253,839
 
Investments in Derivatives:
                         
Credit Default Swaps**
   
   
197,460
   
   
197,460
 
Total
 
$
 
$
455,451,299
 
$
 
$
455,451,299
 
                           
Texas Quality Income (NTX)
                         
Long-Term Investments*:
                         
Municipal Bonds
 
$
 
$
227,225,220
 
$
 
$
227,225,220
 
Investments in Derivatives:
                         
Credit Default Swaps**
   
   
94,558
   
   
94,558
 
Total
 
$
 
$
227,319,778
 
$
 
$
227,319,778
 
 
*
Refer to the Fund’s Portfolio of Investments for industry classifications.
**
Represents net unrealized appreciation (depreciation) as reported in the Fund’s Portfolio of Investments.
 
The Board is responsible for the valuation process and has appointed the oversight of the daily valuation process to the Adviser’s Valuation Committee. The Valuation Committee, pursuant to the valuation policies and procedures adopted by the Board, is responsible for making fair value determinations, evaluating the effectiveness of the Funds’ pricing policies and reporting to the Board. The Valuation Committee is aided in its efforts by the Adviser’s dedicated Securities Valuation Team, which is responsible for administering the daily valuation process and applying fair value methodologies as approved by the Valuation Committee. When determining the reliability of independent pricing services for investments owned by the Funds, the Valuation Committee, among other things, conducts due diligence reviews of the pricing services and monitors the quality of security prices received through various testing reports conducted by the Securities Valuation Team.
 
The Valuation Committee will consider pricing methodologies it deems relevant and appropriate when making a fair value determination, based on the facts and circumstances specific to the portfolio instrument. Fair value determinations generally will be derived as follows, using public or private market information:

 
(i)
If available, fair value determinations shall be derived by extrapolating from recent transactions or quoted prices for identical or comparable securities.
     
 
(ii)
If such information is not available, an analytical valuation methodology may be used based on other available information including, but not limited to: analyst appraisals, research reports, corporate action information, issuer financial statements and shelf registration statements. Such analytical valuation methodologies may include, but are not limited to: multiple of earnings, discount from market value of a similar freely-traded security, discounted cash flow analysis, book value or a multiple thereof, risk premium/yield analysis, yield to maturity and/or fundamental investment analysis.
 
Nuveen Investments
 
73

 
 

 
 
Notes to Financial Statements (continued)
 
The purchase price of a portfolio instrument will be used to fair value the instrument only if no other valuation methodology is available or deemed appropriate, and it is determined that the purchase price fairly reflects the instrument’s current value.
 
For each portfolio security that has been fair valued pursuant to the policies adopted by the Board, the fair value price is compared against the last available and next available market quotations. The Valuation Committee reviews the results of such testing and fair valuation occurrences are reported to the Board.
 
3. Portfolio Securities and Investments in Derivatives
 
Portfolio Securities
 
Inverse Floating Rate Securities
Each Fund is authorized to invest in inverse floating rate securities. An inverse floating rate security is created by depositing a municipal bond (referred to as an “Underlying Bond”), typically with a fixed interest rate, into a special purpose trust (referred to as the “Trust”) created by or at the direction of one or more Funds. In turn, the Trust issues (a) floating rate certificates (referred to as “Floaters”), in face amounts equal to some fraction of the Underlying Bond’s par amount or market value, and (b) an inverse floating rate certificate (referred to as an “Inverse Floater”) that represents all remaining or residual interest in the Trust. Floaters typically pay short-term tax-exempt interest rates to third parties who are also provided a right to tender their certificate and receive its par value, which may be paid from the proceeds of a remarketing of the Floaters, by a loan to the Trust from a third party liquidity provider, or by the sale of assets from the Trust. The Inverse Floater is issued to a long term investor, such as one or more of the Funds. The income received by the Inverse Floater holder varies inversely with the short-term rate paid to holders of the Floaters, and in most circumstances the Inverse Floater holder bears substantially all of the Underlying Bond’s downside investment risk and also benefits disproportionately from any potential appreciation of the Underlying Bond’s value. The value of an Inverse Floater will be more volatile than that of the Underlying Bond because the interest rate is dependent on not only the fixed coupon rate of the Underlying Bond but also on the short-term interest paid on the Floaters, and because the Inverse Floater essentially bears the risk of loss of the greater face value of the Underlying Bond.
 
The Inverse Floater held by a Fund gives the Fund the right to (a) cause the holders of the Floaters to tender their certificates at par, and (b) have the trustee of the Trust transfer the Underlying Bond held by the Trust to the Fund, thereby collapsing the Trust.
 
The Fund may acquire an Inverse Floater in a transaction where it (a) transfers an Underlying Bond that it owns to a Trust created by a third party or (b) transfers an Underlying Bond that it owns, or that it has purchased in a secondary market transaction for the purpose of creating an Inverse Floater, to a Trust created at its direction, and in return receives the Inverse Floater of the Trust (referred to as a “self-deposited Inverse Floater”). A Fund may also purchase an Inverse Floater in a secondary market transaction from a third party creator of the Trust without first owning the Underlying Bond (referred to as an “externally-deposited Inverse Floater”).
 
An investment in a self-deposited Inverse Floater is accounted for as a “financing” transaction (i.e., a secured borrowing). For a self-deposited Inverse Floater, the Underlying Bond deposited into the Trust is identified in the Fund’s Portfolio of Investments as “(UB) – Underlying bond of an inverse floating rate trust reflected as a financing transaction,” with the Fund recognizing the Floaters issued by the Trust as liabilities, at their liquidation value on the Statement of Assets and Liabilities as “Floating rate obligations.” In addition, the Fund recognizes in “Investment Income” the entire earnings of the Underlying Bond and recognizes the related interest paid to the holders of the Floaters as a component of “Interest expense and amortization of offering costs” on the Statement of Operations.
 
In contrast, an investment in an externally-deposited Inverse Floater is accounted for as a purchase of the inverse floater and is identified in the Fund’s Portfolio of Investments as “(IF) – Inverse floating rate investment.” For an externally-deposited Inverse Floater, a Fund’s Statement of Assets and Liabilities recognizes the Inverse Floater and not the Underlying Bond as an asset, and the Fund does not recognize the Floaters as a liability. Additionally, the Fund reflects in “Investment Income” only the net amount of earnings on the Inverse Floater (net of the interest paid to the holders of the Floaters and the expenses of the Trust), and does not show the amount of that interest paid as an interest expense on the Statement of Operations.
 
The average floating rate obligations outstanding and average annual interest rate and fees related to self-deposited Inverse Floaters during the current fiscal period were as follows:

     
Arizona
   
Michigan
   
Ohio
   
Texas
 
     
Premium
   
Quality
   
Quality
   
Quality
 
     
Income
   
Income
   
Income
   
Income
 
Self-Deposited Inverse Floaters
   
(NAZ
)
 
(NUM
)
 
(NUO
)
 
(NTX
)
Average floating rate obligations outstanding
 
$
2,755,000
 
$
6,625,000
 
$
2,126,712
 
$
3,960,000
 
Average annual interest rate and fees
   
0.54
%
 
0.77
%
 
0.57
%
 
0.28
%
 
74
 
Nuveen Investments

 
 

 
 
As of the end of the reporting period, the total amount of floating rate obligations associated with each Fund’s self-deposited Inverse Floaters and externally-deposited Inverse Floaters was as follows:

     
Arizona
   
Michigan
   
Ohio
   
Texas
 
     
Premium
   
Quality
   
Quality
   
Quality
 
     
Income
   
Income
   
Income
   
Income
 
Floating Rate Obligations Outstanding
   
(NAZ
)
 
(NUM
)
 
(NUO
)
 
(NTX
)
Floating rate obligations: self-deposited Inverse Floaters
 
$
2,755,000
 
$
6,625,000
 
$
 
$
3,960,000
 
Floating rate obligations: externally-deposited Inverse Floaters
   
14,215,000
   
8,430,000
   
23,155,000
   
 
Total
 
$
16,970,000
 
$
15,055,000
 
$
23,155,000
 
$
3,960,000
 
 
Each Fund may also enter into shortfall and forbearance agreements (sometimes referred to as a “recourse arrangement” or “credit recovery swap”) (Trusts involving such agreements are referred to herein as “Recourse Trusts”), under which a Fund agrees to reimburse the liquidity provider for the Trust’s Floaters, in certain circumstances, for the amount (if any) by which the liquidation value of the Underlying Bond held by the Trust may fall short of the liquidation value of the Floaters issued by the Trust, plus any shortfalls in interest cash flows. Under these agreements, a Fund’s potential exposure to losses related to or on an Inverse Floater may increase beyond the value of the Inverse Floater as a Fund may potentially be liable to fulfill all amounts owed to holders of the Floaters. At period end, any such shortfall amount in the aggregate is recognized as “Unrealized depreciation on Recourse Trusts” on the Statement of Assets and Liabilities.
 
As of the end of the reporting period, each Fund’s maximum exposure to the floating rate obligations issued by externally-deposited Recourse Trusts, was as follows:
                           
     
Arizona
   
Michigan
   
Ohio
   
Texas
 
     
Premium
   
Quality
   
Quality
   
Quality
 
     
Income
   
Income
   
Income
   
Income
 
Floating Rate Obligations – Externally-Deposited Recourse Trusts
   
(NAZ
)
 
(NUM
)
 
(NUO
)
 
(NTX
)
Maximum exposure to Recourse Trusts
 
$
7,500,000
 
$
8,430,000
 
$
4,480,000
 
$
 
 
Zero Coupon Securities
A zero coupon security does not pay a regular interest coupon to its holders during the life of the security. Income to the holder of the security comes from accretion of the difference between the original purchase price of the security at issuance and the par value of the security at maturity and is effectively paid at maturity. The market prices of zero coupon securities generally are more volatile than the market prices of securities that pay interest periodically.
 
Investments in Derivatives
In addition to the inverse floating rate securities in which each Fund invests, which are considered portfolio securities for financial reporting purposes, each Fund is authorized to invest in certain other derivative instruments such as futures, options and swap contracts. Each Fund limits its investments in futures, options on futures and swap contracts to the extent necessary for the Adviser to claim the exclusion from registration by the Commodity Futures Trading Commission as a commodity pool operator with respect to the Fund. The Funds record derivative instruments at fair value, with changes in fair value recognized on the Statement of Operations, when applicable. Even though the Funds’ investments in derivatives may represent economic hedges, they are not considered to be hedge transactions for financial reporting purposes.
 
Credit Default Swaps
A Fund may enter into a credit default swap contract to seek to maintain a total return on a particular investment or portion of its portfolio, or to take an active long or short position with respect to the likelihood of a particular issuer’s default. Credit default swap contracts involve one party making a stream of payments to another party in exchange for the right to receive a specified return if/when there is a credit event by a third party. Generally, a credit event means bankruptcy, failure to pay, or restructuring. The specific credit events applicable for each credit default swap are stated in the terms of the particular swap agreement. As a purchaser of a credit default swap contract, a Fund pays to the counterparty a periodic interest fee based on the notional amount of the credit default swap.
 
Upon occurrence of a specific credit event with respect to the underlying referenced entity, the Fund is obligated to deliver that security, or an equivalent amount of cash, to the counterparty in exchange for receipt of the notional amount from the counterparty. The difference between the value of the security delivered and the notional amount received is recorded as a realized gain or loss. Payments received or made at the beginning of the measurement period are recognized as a component of “Credit default swaps premiums paid and/or received” on the Statement of Assets and Liabilities, when applicable. As a purchaser of a credit default swap contract, the Fund pays to the counterparty a periodic interest fee based on the notional amount of the credit default swap. As a seller of a credit default swap contract, the Fund generally receives from the counterparty a periodic interest fee based on the notional amount of the credit default swap. Upon occurrence of a specific credit event with respect to the underlying referenced entity, the Fund will either receive that security, or an equivalent amount of cash, from the counterparty in exchange for payment of the notional amount to the counterparty, or pay a net settlement amount of the credit default swap contract less the recovery value of the referenced

Nuveen Investments
 
75

 
 

 
 
Notes to Financial Statements (continued)
 
obligation or underlying securities comprising the referenced index. The difference between the value of the security received and the notional amount paid is recorded as a realized loss.
 
Changes in the value of a credit default swap during the fiscal period are recognized as a component of “Change in net unrealized appreciation (depreciation) of swaps,” and realized gains and losses are recognized as a component of “Net realized gain (loss) from swaps” on the Statement of Operations. Investments in swaps cleared through an exchange obligate a Fund and the clearing broker to settle monies on a daily basis representing changes in the prior days “mark-to-market” of the swap. If a Fund has unrealized appreciation the clearing broker would credit the Fund’s account with an amount equal to the appreciation and conversely if a Fund has unrealized depreciation the clearing broker would debit a Fund’s account with an amount equal to the depreciation. These daily cash settlements are also known as “variation margin.” Variation margin is recognized as a receivable and/or payable for “Variation margin on swap contracts” on the Statement of Assets and Liabilities. The maximum potential amount of future payments the Fund could incur as a seller of protection in a credit default swap contract is limited to the notional amount of the contract. The maximum potential amount would be offset by the recovery value, if any, of the respective referenced entity.
 
During the current fiscal period, Michigan Quality Income (NUM), Ohio Quality Income (NUO) and Texas Quality Income (NTX) invested in credit default swaps to manage credit risk by purchasing credit protection.
 
The average notional amount of credit default swap contracts outstanding during the current fiscal period was as follows:

     
Michigan
   
Ohio
   
Texas
 
     
Quality
   
Quality
   
Quality
 
     
Income
   
Income
   
Income
 
     
(NUM
)
 
(NUO
)
 
(NTX
)
Average notional amount of credit default swap contracts outstanding*
 
$
1,580,000
 
$
1,540,000
 
$
732,000
 
 
*
The average notional amount is calculated based on the outstanding notional at the beginning of the fiscal year and at the end of each fiscal quarter within the current fiscal year.
 
The following table presents the fair value of all swap contracts held by the Funds as of the end of the reporting period, the location of these instruments on the Statement of Assets and Liabilities and the primary underlying risk exposure.

       
Location on the Statement of Assets and Liabilities
       
Asset Derivatives
   
(Liability) Derivatives
 
Underlying
 
Derivative
                       
Risk Exposure
 
Instrument
 
Location
   
Value
   
Location
   
Value
 
Michigan Quality Income (NUM)
                           
Credit
 
Swaps
 
Unrealized appreciation on
credit default swaps**
 
$
187,352
   
 
$
 
Ohio Quality Income (NUO)
                           
Credit
 
Swaps
 
Unrealized appreciation on
credit default swaps**
 
$
197,460
   
 
$
 
Texas Quality Income (NTX)
                           
Credit
 
Swaps
 
Unrealized appreciation on
credit default swaps**
 
$
94,558
   
 
$
 
 
**
Some swap contracts require a counterparty to pay or receive a premium, which is disclosed on the Statement of Assets and Liabilities and is not reflected in the cumulative unrealized appreciation (depreciation) presented above.
 
76
 
Nuveen Investments

 
 

 
 
The following tables present the swap contracts subject to netting agreements, and the collateral delivered related to those swap contracts as of end of the reporting period.
                                           
         
Gross
   
Gross
   
Amounts
   
Net Unrealized
             
         
Unrealized
   
Unrealized
   
Netted on
   
Appreciation
   
Collateral
       
         
Appreciation on
   
(Depreciation on
)
 
Statement of
   
(Depreciation on
)
 
Pledged
       
         
Credit Default
   
Credit Default
   
Assets and
   
Credit Default
   
to (from
)
 
Net
 
Fund
 
Counterparty
   
Swaps
***
 
Swaps
***
 
Liabilities
   
Swaps
   
Counterparty
   
Exposure
 
Michigan Quality
                                         
Income (NUM)
 
Goldman Sachs
 
$
187,352
 
$
 
$
 
$
187,352
 
$
(187,352
)
$
 
Ohio Quality
                                         
Income (NUO)
 
Goldman Sachs
 
$
197,460
 
$
 
$
 
$
197,460
 
$
(197,460
)
$
 
Texas Quality
                                         
Income (NTX)
 
Citibank N.A.
 
$
94,558
 
$
 
$
 
$
94,558
 
$
(94,558
)
$
 
 
***
Represents gross unrealized appreciation (depreciation) for the counterparty as reported in the Fund’s Portfolio of Investments.
 
The following table presents the amount of net realized gain (loss) and change in net unrealized appreciation (depreciation) recognized on swap contracts on the Statement of Operations during the current fiscal period, and the primary underlying risk exposure.
                           
               
Net Realized
 
Change in Net Unrealized
 
     
Underlying
   
Derivative
 
Gain (Loss from
)
Appreciation (Depreciation of
)
Fund
 
Risk Exposure
   
Instrument
   
Swaps
   
Swaps
 
Michigan Quality Income (NUM)
   
Credit
   
Swaps
 
$
(110,570
)
$
187,352
 
Ohio Quality Income (NUO)
   
Credit
   
Swaps
 
$
(102,819
)
$
197,460
 
Texas Quality Income (NTX)
   
Credit
   
Swaps
 
$
(50,337
)
$
94,558
 
 
Market and Counterparty Credit Risk
In the normal course of business each Fund may invest in financial instruments and enter into financial transactions where risk of potential loss exists due to changes in the market (market risk) or failure of the other party to the transaction to perform (counterparty credit risk). The potential loss could exceed the value of the financial assets recorded on the financial statements. Financial assets, which potentially expose each Fund to counterparty credit risk, consist principally of cash due from counterparties on forward, option and swap transactions, when applicable. The extent of each Fund’s exposure to counterparty credit risk in respect to these financial assets approximates their carrying value as recorded on the Statement of Assets and Liabilities.
 
Each Fund helps manage counterparty credit risk by entering into agreements only with counterparties the Adviser believes have the financial resources to honor their obligations and by having the Adviser monitor the financial stability of the counterparties. Additionally, counterparties may be required to pledge collateral daily (based on the daily valuation of the financial asset) on behalf of each Fund with a value approximately equal to the amount of any unrealized gain above a pre-determined threshold. Reciprocally, when each Fund has an unrealized loss, the Funds have instructed the custodian to pledge assets of the Funds as collateral with a value approximately equal to the amount of the unrealized loss above a pre-determined threshold. Collateral pledges are monitored and subsequently adjusted if and when the valuations fluctuate, either up or down, by at least the pre-determined threshold amount.

Nuveen Investments
 
77

 
 

 
 
Notes to Financial Statements (continued)
 
4. Fund Shares
 
Common Shares
Transactions in common shares during the Funds’ current and prior fiscal period were as follows:

   
Arizona Premium
 
Michigan Quality
 
   
Income (NAZ)
 
Income (NUM)
 
     
Year
   
Year
   
Year
   
Year
 
     
Ended
   
Ended
   
Ended
   
Ended
 
     
2/28/15
   
2/28/14
   
2/28/15
   
2/28/14
 
Common shares:
                         
Issued in the reorganizations
   
   
7,087,734
   
   
 
Issued to shareholders due to reinvestment of distributions
   
   
704
   
   
 
Repurchased and retired
   
   
   
   
(24,300
)
Total
   
   
7,088,438
   
   
(24,300
)
Weighted average common share:
                         
Price per share repurchased and retired
 
$
 
$
 
$
 
$
12.63
 
Discount per share repurchased and retired
   
   
   
   
12.91
%
           
   
Ohio Quality
 
Texas Quality
 
   
Income (NUO)
 
Income (NTX)
 
     
Year
   
Year
   
Year
   
Year
 
     
Ended
   
Ended
   
Ended
   
Ended
 
     
2/28/15
   
2/28/14
   
2/28/15
   
2/28/14
 
Common shares:
                         
Issued in the reorganizations
   
   
8,710,950
   
   
 
Sold through shelf offering
   
   
N/A
   
   
10,120
 
Issued to shareholders due to reinvestment of distributions
   
   
7,507
   
   
2,256
 
Total
   
   
8,718,457
   
   
12,376
 
Weighted average common share:
                         
Premium to NAV per shelf offering share sold
   
N/A
   
N/A
   
%
 
1.35
%
 
N/A – The Fund is not authorized to issue additional common shares through a shelf offering.
 
Preferred Shares
Transactions in preferred shares for the Funds during the Funds’ current and prior fiscal period, where applicable, are noted in the following tables.
 
Transactions in MTP Shares for the Funds, where applicable, were as follows:
                           
   
Year Ended February 28, 2014
 
           
NYSE/
             
           
NYSE MKT
             
     
Series
   
Ticker
   
Shares
   
Amount
 
Arizona Premium Income (NAZ)
                         
MTP Shares issued in connection with the reorganizations:
                         
     
2015
   
NAZ PRC
   
2,982,500
 
$
29,825,000
 
     
2016
   
NAZ PRD
   
2,084,600
   
20,846,000
 
MTP Shares redeemed:
                         
     
2015
   
NAZ PRC
   
(2,982,500
)
 
(29,825,000
)
     
2016
   
NAZ PRD
   
(2,084,600
)
 
(20,846,000
)
Net increase (decrease)
               
 
$
 
 
78
 
Nuveen Investments
 
 
 

 
 
   
Year Ended February 28, 2014
 
           
NYSE/
             
           
NYSE MKT
             
     
Series
   
Ticker
   
Shares
   
Amount
 
Michigan Quality Income (NUM)
                         
MTP Shares issued in connection with the reorganization
   
2015
   
NUM PRC
   
1,631,300
 
$
16,313,000
 
MTP Shares redeemed
   
2015
   
NUM PRC
   
(1,631,300
)
$
(16,313,000
)
Net increase (decrease)
       
 
 
   
 
$
 
                           
   
Year Ended February 28, 2014
 
           
NYSE/
             
           
NYSE MKT
             
     
Series
   
Ticker
   
Shares
   
Amount
 
Ohio Quality Income (NUO)
                         
MTP Shares issued in connection with the reorganizations:
                         
     
2014
   
NUO PRACL
   
4,271,415
 
$
42,714,150
 
     
2015
   
NUO PRCCL
   
1,945,000
   
19,450,000
 
     
2016
   
NUO PRDCL
   
1,165,340
   
11,653,400
 
MTP Shares redeemed:
                         
     
2014
   
NUO PRACL
   
(4,271,415
)
 
(42,714,150
)
     
2015
   
NUO PRCCL
   
(1,945,000
)
 
(19,450,000
)
     
2016
   
NUO PRDCL
   
(1,165,340
)
 
(11,653,400
)
Net increase (decrease)
   
 
 
 
 
   
 
 
 
Transactions in VMTP Shares for the Funds, where applicable, were as follows:

   
Year Ended February 28, 2014
 
     
Series
   
Shares
   
Amount
 
Arizona Premium Income (NAZ)
                   
VMTP Shares issued
   
2016
   
790
 
$
79,000,000
 
VMTP Shares redeemed
   
2014
   
(280
)
 
(28,000,000
)
Net increase (decrease)
         
510
 
$
51,000,000
 
                     
Michigan Quality Income (NUM)
                   
VMTP Shares issued
   
2016
   
1,590
 
$
159,000,000
 
VMTP Shares exchanged
   
2014
   
(879
)
 
(87,900,000
)
VMTP Shares issued in connection with the reorganization
   
2014-1
   
539
 
$
53,900,000
 
VMTP Shares redeemed
   
2014-1
   
(539
)
 
(53,900,000
)
Net increase (decrease)
         
711
 
$
71,100,000
 
                     
Ohio Quality Income (NUO)
                   
VMTP Shares redeemed
   
2014
   
(735
)
$
(73,500,000
)
 
Transactions in VRDP Shares for the Funds, where applicable, were as follows:
                     
   
Year Ended February 28, 2014
 
     
Series
   
Shares
   
Amount
 
Ohio Quality Income (NUO)
                   
VRDP Shares issued
   
1
   
1,480
 
$
148,000,000
 
 
Nuveen Investments
 
79

 
 

 
 
Notes to Financial Statements (continued)
 
5. Investment Transactions
Long-term purchases and sales (including maturities but excluding derivative transactions, where applicable) during the current fiscal period were as follows:
                           
     
Arizona
   
Michigan
   
Ohio
   
Texas
 
     
Premium
   
Quality
   
Quality
   
Quality
 
     
Income
   
Income
   
Income
   
Income
 
     
(NAZ
)
 
(NUM
)
 
(NUO
)
 
(NTX
)
Purchases
 
$
34,487,478
 
$
74,406,401
 
$
68,770,258
 
$
27,827,073
 
Sales and maturities
   
32,977,140
   
81,820,058
   
77,713,306
   
32,571,648
 
 
6. Income Tax Information
Each Fund is a separate taxpayer for federal income tax purposes. Each Fund intends to distribute substantially all of its net investment income and net capital gains to shareholders and to otherwise comply with the requirements of Subchapter M of the Internal Revenue Code applicable to regulated investment companies. Therefore, no federal income tax provision is required. Furthermore, each Fund intends to satisfy conditions that will enable interest from municipal securities, which is exempt from regular federal and designated state income taxes, to retain such tax-exempt status when distributed to shareholders of the Funds. Net realized capital gains and ordinary income distributions paid by the Funds are subject to federal taxation.
 
For all open tax years and all major taxing jurisdictions, management of the Funds has concluded that there are no significant uncertain tax positions that would require recognition in the financial statements. Open tax years are those that are open for examination by taxing authorities (i.e., generally the last four tax year ends and the interim tax period since then). Furthermore, management of the Funds is also not aware of any tax positions for which it is reasonably possible that the total amounts of unrecognized tax benefits will significantly change in the next twelve months.
 
The following information is presented on an income tax basis. Differences between amounts for financial statement and federal income tax purposes are primarily due to timing differences in recognizing taxable market discount, timing differences in recognizing certain gains and losses on investment transactions and the treatment of investments in inverse floating rate securities reflected as financing transactions, if any. To the extent that differences arise that are permanent in nature, such amounts are reclassified within the capital accounts as detailed below. Temporary differences do not require reclassification. Temporary and permanent differences do not impact the NAVs of the Funds.
 
As of February 28, 2015, the cost and unrealized appreciation (depreciation) of investments (excluding investments in derivatives), as determined on a federal income tax basis, were as follows:
 
                           
     
Arizona
   
Michigan
   
Ohio
   
Texas
 
     
Premium
   
Quality
   
Quality
   
Quality
 
     
Income
   
Income
   
Income
   
Income
 
     
(NAZ
)
 
(NUM
)
 
(NUO
)
 
(NTX
)
Cost of investments
 
$
230,132,307
 
$
441,022,900
 
$
419,102,266
 
$
206,369,839
 
Gross unrealized:
                         
Appreciation
 
$
21,936,698
 
$
34,999,266
 
$
38,486,741
 
$
20,498,758
 
Depreciation
   
(2,210,745
)
 
(983,160
)
 
(2,335,168
)
 
(3,603,383
)
Net unrealized appreciation (depreciation) of investments
 
$
19,725,953
 
$
34,016,106
 
$
36,151,573
 
$
16,895,375
 
 
Permanent differences, primarily due to expiration of capital loss carryforwards, treatment of notional principal contracts, nondeductible reorganization expenses, federal taxes paid, taxable market discount and nondeductible offering costs, resulted in reclassifications among the Funds’ components of common share net assets as of February 28, 2015, the Funds’ tax year end, as follows:
                           
     
Arizona
   
Michigan
   
Ohio
   
Texas
 
     
Premium
   
Quality
   
Quality
   
Quality
 
     
Income
   
Income
   
Income
   
Income
 
     
(NAZ
)
 
(NUM
)
 
(NUO
)
 
(NTX
)
Paid-in surplus
 
$
(309,943
)
$
(37,134
)
$
245,591
 
$
(294,053
)
Undistributed (Over-distribution of) net investment income
   
(59,630
)
 
(88,379
)
 
(356,317
)
 
179,243
 
Accumulated net realized gain (loss)
   
369,573
   
125,513
   
110,726
   
114,810
 
 
80
 
Nuveen Investments

 
 

 
 
The tax components of undistributed net tax-exempt income, net ordinary income and net long-term capital gains as of February 28, 2015, the Funds’ tax year end, were as follows:
                           
     
Arizona
   
Michigan
   
Ohio
   
Texas
 
     
Premium
   
Quality
   
Quality
   
Quality
 
     
Income
   
Income
   
Income
   
Income
 
     
(NAZ
)
 
(NUM
)
 
(NUO
)
 
(NTX
)
Undistributed net tax-exempt income 1
 
$
1,788,043
 
$
1,808,860
 
$
1,019,965
 
$
484,128
 
Undistributed net ordinary income 2
   
   
958
   
29,139
   
 
Undistributed net long-term capital gains
   
   
   
   
 
 
1
Undistributed net tax-exempt income (on a tax basis) has not been reduced for the dividend declared on February 2, 2015, paid on March 2, 2015.
2
Net ordinary income consists of taxable market discount income and net short-term capital gains, if any.
 
The tax character of distributions paid during the Funds’ tax years ended February 28, 2015 and February 28, 2014 was designated for purposes of the dividends paid deduction as follows:

     
Arizona
   
Michigan
   
Ohio
   
Texas
 
     
Premium
   
Quality
   
Quality
   
Quality
 
     
Income
   
Income
   
Income
   
Income
 
2015
   
(NAZ
)
 
(NUM
)
 
(NUO
)
 
(NTX
)
Distributions from net tax-exempt income3
 
$
9,960,313
 
$
19,600,465
 
$
17,430,996
 
$
8,434,464
 
Distributions from net ordinary income2
   
3,316
   
4,167
   
50,009
   
10,213
 
Distributions from net long-term capital gains
   
   
   
   
 
                           
     
Arizona
   
Michigan
   
Ohio
   
Texas
 
     
Premium
   
Quality
   
Quality
   
Quality
 
     
Income
   
Income
   
Income
   
Income
 
2014
   
(NAZ
)
 
(NUM
)
 
(NUO
)
 
(NTX
)
Distributions from net tax-exempt income
 
$
8,799,830
 
$
20,509,116
 
$
17,769,971
 
$
8,638,012
 
Distributions from net ordinary income2
   
23,128
   
27,103
   
94,586
   
4,011
 
Distributions from net long-term capital gains
   
   
   
   
 
 
2
Net ordinary income consists of taxable market discount income and net short-term capital gains, if any.
3
The Funds hereby designated these amounts paid during the fiscal year ended February 28, 2015, as Exempt Interest Dividends.
 
As of February 28, 2015, the Funds’ tax year end, the Funds had unused capital loss carryforwards available for federal income tax purposes to be applied against future capital gains, if any. If not applied, the carryforwards will expire as shown in the following table. The losses not subject to expiration will be utilized first by a Fund.
                           
     
Arizona
   
Michigan
   
Ohio
   
Texas
 
     
Premium
   
Quality
   
Quality
   
Quality
 
     
Income
   
Income
   
Income
   
Income
 
     
(NAZ
)
 
(NUM4
)
 
(NUO4
)
 
(NTX
)
Expiration:
                         
February 29, 2016
   
615,885
   
   
   
 
February 28, 2017
   
828,959
   
620,251
   
173,469
   
 
February 28, 2018
   
43,720
   
487,225
   
857,567
   
 
February 28, 2019
   
   
   
1,468,286
   
 
Not subject to expiration
   
3,328,594
   
   
   
1,149,603
 
Total
 
$
4,817,158
 
$
1,107,476
 
$
2,499,322
 
$
1,149,603
 
 
4
A portion of Michigan Quality Income’s (NUM) and Ohio Quality Income’s (NUO) capital loss carryforward is subject to an annual limitation under the Internal Revenue Code and related regulations.
 
During the Funds’ tax year ended February 28, 2015, the following Funds utilized capital loss carryforwards as follows:
                     
     
Michigan
   
Ohio
   
Texas
 
     
Quality
   
Quality
   
Quality
 
     
Income
   
Income
   
Income
 
     
(NUM
)
 
(NUO
)
 
(NTX
)
Utilized capital loss carryforwards
 
$
1,803,496
 
$
2,684,222
 
$
76,734
 
 
As of February 28, 2015, the Funds’ tax year end, $363,937 of Arizona Premium Income’s capital loss carryforward expired.

Nuveen Investments
 
81

 
 

 
 
Notes to Financial Statements (continued)
 
7. Management Fees and Other Transactions with Affiliates
Each Fund’s management fee compensates the Adviser for overall investment advisory and administrative services and general office facilities. The Sub-Adviser is compensated for its services to the Funds from the management fees paid to the Adviser.
 
Each Fund’s management fee consists of two components – a fund-level fee, based only on the amount of assets within each individual Fund, and a complex-level fee, based on the aggregate amount of all eligible fund assets managed by the Adviser. This pricing structure enables Fund shareholders to benefit from growth in the assets within their respective Fund as well as from growth in the amount of complex-wide assets managed by the Adviser.
 
The annual Fund-level fee, payable monthly, for each Fund is calculated according to the following schedule:
     
Average Daily Managed Assets*
Fund-Level Fee
For the first $125 million
0.4500
%
For the next $125 million
0.4375
 
For the next $250 million
0.4250
 
For the next $500 million
0.4125
 
For the next $1 billion
0.4000
 
For the next $3 billion
0.3875
 
For managed assets over $5 billion
0.3750
 
 
The annual complex-level fee, payable monthly, for each Fund is calculated according to the following schedule:
   
Complex-Level Managed Asset Breakpoint Level*
Effective Rate at Breakpoint Level
$55 billion
0.2000
%
$56 billion
0.1996
 
$57 billion
0.1989
 
$60 billion
0.1961
 
$63 billion
0.1931
 
$66 billion
0.1900
 
$71 billion
0.1851
 
$76 billion
0.1806
 
$80 billion
0.1773
 
$91 billion
0.1691
 
$125 billion
0.1599
 
$200 billion
0.1505
 
$250 billion
0.1469
 
$300 billion
0.1445
 
 
*
For the fund-level and complex-level fees, managed assets include closed-end fund assets managed by the Adviser that are attributable to certain types of leverage. For these purposes, leverage includes the funds’ use of preferred stock and borrowings and certain investments in the residual interest certificates (also called inverse floating rate securities) in tender option bond (TOB) trusts, including the portion of assets held by a TOB trust that has been effectively financed by the trust’s issuance of floating rate securities, subject to an agreement by the Adviser as to certain funds to limit the amount of such assets for determining managed assets in certain circumstances. The complex-level fee is calculated based upon the aggregate daily managed assets of all Nuveen funds that constitute “eligible assets.” Eligible assets do not include assets attributable to investments in other Nuveen funds or assets in excess of $2 billion added to the Nuveen fund complex in connection with the Adviser’s assumption of the management of the former First American Funds effective January 1, 2011. As of February 28, 2015, the complex-level fee rate for each Fund was 0.1635%.
 
The Funds pay no compensation directly to those of its trustees who are affiliated with the Adviser or to its officers, all of whom receive remuneration for their services to the Funds from the Adviser or its affiliates. The Board has adopted a deferred compensation plan for independent trustees that enables trustees to elect to defer receipt of all or a portion of the annual compensation they are entitled to receive from certain Nuveen-advised funds. Under the plan, deferred amounts are treated as though equal dollar amounts had been invested in shares of select Nuveen-advised funds.
 
8. Subsequent Events
 
Refinancing of MTP and iMTP Shares
Subsequent to the close of the reporting period, Texas Quality Income (NTX) redeemed its MTP Shares at their $10.00 liquidation value per share, plus dividend amounts owed, with the proceeds from $72,000,000 of newly issued 2018 Institutional MuniFund Term Preferred (“iMTP”) Shares. On April 10, 2015, Series 2018 iMTP Shares were issued to qualified institutional buyers in a private offering pursuant to Rule 144A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Texas Quality Income’s (NTX) MTP Shares were redeemed on April 20, 2015.

82
 
Nuveen Investments

 
 

 
 
Additional Fund Information
 
Board of Trustees
         
William Adams IV*
Jack B. Evans
William C. Hunter
David J. Kundert
John K. Nelson
William J. Schneider
Thomas S. Schreier, Jr.*
Judith M. Stockdale
Carole E. Stone
Virginia L. Stringer
Terence J. Toth
 
 
* Interested Board Member.
 


Fund Manager
Custodian
Legal Counsel
Independent Registered
Transfer Agent and
Nuveen Fund Advisors, LLC
State Street Bank
Chapman and Cutler LLP
Public Accounting Firm
Shareholder Services
333 West Wacker Drive
& Trust Company
Chicago, IL 60603
KPMG LLP
State Street Bank
Chicago, IL 60606
Boston, MA 02111
 
Chicago, IL 60601
& Trust Company
       
Nuveen Funds
       
P.O. Box 43071
       
Providence, RI 02940-3071
       
(800) 257-8787
 

Quarterly Form N-Q Portfolio of Investments Information
 
Each Fund is required to file its complete schedule of portfolio holdings with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) for the first and third quarters of each fiscal year on Form N-Q. You may obtain this information directly from the SEC. Visit the SEC on-line at http://www.sec.gov or in person at the SEC’s Public Reference Room in Washington, D.C. Call the SEC toll-free at (800) SEC-0330 for room hours and operation.
 
Nuveen Funds’ Proxy Voting Information
 
You may obtain (i) information regarding how each fund voted proxies relating to portfolio securities held during the most recent twelve-month period ended June 30, without charge, upon request, by calling Nuveen Investments toll-free at (800) 257-8787 or on Nuveen’s website at www.nuveen.com and (ii) a description of the policies and procedures that each fund used to determine how to vote proxies relating to portfolio securities without charge, upon request, by calling Nuveen Investments toll free at (800) 257-8787. You may also obtain this information directly from the SEC. Visit the SEC on-line at http://www.sec.gov.
 

CEO Certification Disclosure
 
Each Fund’s Chief Executive Officer (CEO) has submitted to the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) the annual CEO certification as required by Section 303A.12(a) of the NYSE Listed Company Manual. Each Fund has filed with the SEC the certification of its CEO and Chief Financial Officer required by Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act.
 

Common Share Repurchases
 
Each Fund intends to repurchase, through its open-market share repurchase program, shares of its own common stock at such times and in such amounts as is deemed advisable. During the period covered by this report, each Fund repurchased shares of its common stock, as shown in the accompanying table. Any future repurchases will be reported to shareholders in the next annual or semi-annual report.
                           
     
NAZ
   
NUM
   
NUO
   
NTX
 
Common shares repurchased
   
   
   
   
 
 
FINRA BrokerCheck
 
The Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) provides information regarding the disciplinary history of FINRA member firms and associated investment professionals. This information as well as an investor brochure describing FINRA BrokerCheck is available to the public by calling the FINRA BrokerCheck Hotline number at (800) 289-9999 or by visiting www.FINRA.org.

 Nuveen Investments
 
83

 
 

 
 
Glossary of Terms Used in this Report (Unaudited)

Auction Rate Bond: An auction rate bond is a security whose interest payments are adjusted periodically through an auction process, which process typically also serves as a means for buying and selling the bond. Auctions that fail to attract enough buyers for all the shares offered for sale are deemed to have “failed,” with current holders receiving a formula-based interest rate until the next scheduled auction.
   
Average Annual Total Return: This is a commonly used method to express an investment’s performance over a particular, usually multi-year time period. It expresses the return that would have been necessary each year to equal the investment’s actual cumulative performance (including change in NAV or market price and reinvested dividends and capital gains distributions, if any) over the time period being considered.
   
Duration: Duration is a measure of the expected period over which a bond’s principal and interest will be paid, and consequently is a measure of the sensitivity of a bond’s or bond fund’s value to changes when market interest rates change. Generally, the longer a bond’s or fund’s duration, the more the price of the bond or fund will change as interest rates change.
   
Effective Leverage: Effective leverage is a fund’s effective economic leverage, and includes both regulatory leverage (see leverage) and the leverage effects of certain derivative investments in the fund’s portfolio. Currently, the leverage effects of Tender Option Bond (TOB) inverse floater holdings are included in effective leverage values, in addition to any regulatory leverage.
   
Gross Domestic Product (GDP): The total market value of all final goods and services produced in a country/region in a given year, equal to total consumer, investment and government spending, plus the value of exports, minus the value of imports.
   
Inverse Floating Rate Securities: Inverse floating rate securities, also known as inverse floaters or tender option bonds (TOBs), are created by depositing a municipal bond, typically with a fixed interest rate, into a special purpose trust. This trust, in turn, (a) issues floating rate certificates typically paying short-term tax-exempt interest rates to third parties in amounts equal to some fraction of the deposited bond’s par amount or market value, and (b) issues an inverse floating rate certificate (sometimes referred to as an “inverse floater”) to an investor (such as a fund) interested in gaining investment exposure to a long-term municipal bond. The income received by the holder of the inverse floater varies inversely with the short-term rate paid to the floating rate certificates’ holders, and in most circumstances the holder of the inverse floater bears substantially all of the underlying bond’s downside investment risk. The holder of the inverse floater typically also benefits disproportionately from any potential appreciation of the underlying bond’s value. Hence, an inverse floater essentially represents an investment in the underlying bond on a leveraged basis.
   
Leverage: Leverage is created whenever a fund has investment exposure (both reward and/or risk) equivalent to more than 100% of the investment capital.
   
Lipper Other States Municipal Debt Funds Classification Average: Calculated using the returns of all closed-end funds in this category. Lipper returns account for the effects of management fees and assume reinvestment of distributions, but do not reflect any applicable sales charges.
   
Net Asset Value (NAV) Per Share: A fund’s Net Assets is equal to its total assets (securities, cash, accrued earnings and receivables) less its total liabilities. NAV per share is equal to the fund’s Net Assets divided by its number of shares outstanding.
   
Pre-Refunding: Pre-Refunding, also known as advanced refundings or refinancings, is a procedure used by state and local governments to refinance municipal bonds to lower interest expenses. The issuer sells new bonds with a lower yield and uses the proceeds to buy U.S. Treasury securities, the interest from which is used to make payments on the higher-yielding bonds. Because of this collateral, pre-refunding generally raises a bond’s credit rating and thus its value.
 
84
 
Nuveen Investments

 
 

 

Regulatory Leverage: Regulatory leverage consists of preferred shares issued by or borrowings of a fund. Both of these are part of a fund’s capital structure. Regulatory leverage is subject to asset coverage limits set in the Investment Company Act of 1940.
   
S&P Municipal Bond Indexes Arizona, Michigan, Ohio and Texas: Unleveraged, market value-weighted indexes designed to measure the performance of the tax-exempt, investment-grade municipal bond markets in Arizona, Michigan, Ohio and Texas, respectively. Index returns assume reinvestment of distributions, but do not reflect any applicable sales charges or management fees.
   
S&P Municipal Bond Index: An unleveraged, market value-weighted index designed to measure the performance of the tax-exempt, investment-grade U.S. municipal bond market. Index returns assume reinvestment of distributions, but do not reflect any applicable sales charges or management fees.
   
Total Investment Exposure: Total investment exposure is a fund’s assets managed by the Adviser that are attributable to financial leverage. For these purposes, financial leverage includes a fund’s use of preferred stock and borrowings and investments in the residual interest certificates (also called inverse floating rate securities) in tender option bond (TOB) trusts, including the portion of assets held by a TOB trust that has been effectively financed by the trust’s issuance of floating rate securities.
   
Zero Coupon Bond: A zero coupon bond does not pay a regular interest coupon to its holders during the life of the bond. Income to the holder of the bond comes from accretion of the difference between the original purchase price of the bond at issuance and the par value of the bond at maturity and is effectively paid at maturity. The market prices of zero coupon bonds generally are more volatile than the market prices of bonds that pay interest periodically.
 
Nuveen Investments
 
85

 
 

 

Reinvest Automatically, Easily and Conveniently
 
Nuveen makes reinvesting easy. A phone call is all it takes to set up your reinvestment account. 

Nuveen Closed-End Funds Automatic Reinvestment Plan
 
Nuveen Closed-End Fund allows you to conveniently reinvest distributions in additional Fund shares. By choosing to reinvest, you’ll be able to invest money regularly and automatically, and watch your investment grow through the power of compounding. Just like distributions in cash, there may be times when income or capital gains taxes may be payable on distributions that are reinvested. It is important to note that an automatic reinvestment plan does not ensure a profit, nor does it protect you against loss in a declining market.
 
Easy and convenient
 
To make recordkeeping easy and convenient, each month you’ll receive a statement showing your total distributions, the date of investment, the shares acquired and the price per share, and the total number of shares you own.
 
How shares are purchased
 
The shares you acquire by reinvesting will either be purchased on the open market or newly issued by the Fund. If the shares are trading at or above net asset value at the time of valuation, the Fund will issue new shares at the greater of the net asset value or 95% of the then-current market price. If the shares are trading at less than net as -set value, shares for your account will be purchased on the open market. If the Plan Agent begins purchasing Fund shares on the open market while shares are trading below net asset value, but the Fund’s shares subsequently trade at or above their net asset value before the Plan Agent is able to complete its purchases, the Plan Agent may cease open-market purchases and may invest the uninvested portion of the distribution in newly-issued Fund shares at a price equal to the greater of the shares’ net asset value or 95% of the shares’ market value on the last business day imme -diately prior to the purchase date. Distributions received to purchase shares in the open market will normally be invested shortly after the distribution payment date. No interest will be paid on distributions awaiting reinvestment. Because the market price of the shares may increase before purchases are completed, the average purchase price per share may exceed the market price at the time of valuation, resulting in the acquisition of fewer shares than if the distribution had been paid in shares issued by the Fund. A pro rata portion of any applicable brokerage commissions on open market purchases will be paid by Plan participants. These commissions usually will be lower than those charged on individual transactions.
 
Flexible
 
You may change your distribution option or withdraw from the Plan at any time, should your needs or situation change. You can reinvest whether your shares are registered in your name, or in the name of a brokerage firm, bank, or other nominee. Ask your investment advisor if his or her firm will participate on your behalf. Participants whose shares are registered in the name of one firm may not be able to transfer the shares to another firm and continue to participate in the Plan. The Fund reserves the right to amend or terminate the Plan at any time. Although the Fund reserves the right to amend the Plan to include a service charge payable by the participants, there is no direct service charge to participants in the Plan at this time.
 
Call today to start reinvesting distributions
 
For more information on the Nuveen Automatic Reinvestment Plan or to enroll in or withdraw from the Plan, speak with your financial advisor or call us at (800) 257-8787.

86
 
Nuveen Investments

 
 

 
 
Board Members & Officers
 
The management of the Funds, including general supervision of the duties performed for the Funds by the Adviser, is the responsibility of the Board of Trustees of the Funds. The number of trustees of the Funds is currently set at eleven. None of the trustees who are not “interested” persons of the Funds (referred to herein as “independent trustees”) has ever been a director or employee of, or consultant to, Nuveen or its affiliates. The names and business addresses of the trustees and officers of the Funds, their principal occupations and other affiliations during the past five years, the number of portfolios each oversees and other directorships they hold are set forth below.

 
Name,
Year of Birth
& Address
 
Position(s) Held
with the Funds
 
Year First
Elected or
Appointed
and Term(1)
 
Principal
Occupation(s)
Including other
Directorships
During Past 5 Years
 
Number
of Portfolios
in Fund Complex
Overseen by
Board Member
                   
Independent Board Members:
               
                   
WILLIAM J. SCHNEIDER
1944
333 W. Wacker Drive
Chicago, IL 60606
 
 
Chairman and
Board Member
 
 
 
1996
Class III
 
Chairman of Miller-Valentine Partners, a real estate investment company; formerly, Senior Partner and Chief Operating Officer (retired (2004) of Miller-Valentine Group; an owner in several other Miller Valentine entities; Board Member of Med-America Health System, Board Member of WDPR Public Radio station; formerly, member, Business Advisory Council, Cleveland Federal Reserve Bank and University of Dayton Business School Advisory Council.
 
 
 
195
                   
JACK B. EVANS
1948
333 W. Wacker Drive
Chicago, IL 60606
 
 
 
Board Member
 
 
 
1999
Class III
 
President, The Hall-Perrine Foundation, a private philanthropic corporation (since 1996); Director and Chairman, United Fire Group, a publicly held company; formerly, President Pro-Tem of the Board of Regents for the State of Iowa University System; Director, Source Media Group; Life Trustee of Coe College; formerly, Director, Alliant Energy; formerly, Director, Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago; formerly, President and Chief Operating Officer, SCI Financial Group, Inc., a regional financial services firm.
 
 
 
195
                   
WILLIAM C. HUNTER
1948
333 W. Wacker Drive
Chicago, IL 60606
 
 
 
Board Member
 
 
 
2004
Class I
 
Dean Emeritus, formerly, Dean, Tippie College of Business, University of Iowa (2006-2012); Director (since 2004) of Xerox Corporation; Director (since 2005), and President (since July 2012) Beta Gamma Sigma, Inc., The International Business Honor Society; Director of Wellmark, Inc. (since 2009); formerly, Dean and Distinguished Professor of Finance, School of Business at the University of Connecticut (2003-2006); previously, Senior Vice President and Director of Research at the Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago (1995-2003); formerly, Director (1997-2007), Credit Research Center at Georgetown University.
 
 
 
195
                   
DAVID J. KUNDERT
1942
333 W. Wacker Drive
Chicago, IL 60606
 
 
 
Board Member
 
 
 
2005
Class II
 
Formerly, Director, Northwestern Mutual Wealth Management Company (2006-2013), retired (since 2004) as Chairman, JPMorgan Fleming Asset Management, President and CEO, Banc One Investment Advisors Corporation, and President, One Group Mutual Funds; prior thereto, Executive Vice President, Banc One Corporation and Chairman and CEO, Banc One Investment Management Group; Regent Emeritus, Member of Investment Committee, Luther College; member of the Wisconsin Bar Association; member of Board of Directors and Chair of Investment Committee, Greater Milwaukee Foundation; member of the Board of Directors (Milwaukee), College Possible.
 
 
 
195
 
Nuveen Investments
 
87

 
 

 
 
Board Members & Officers (continued)
 
 
Name,
Year of Birth
& Address
 
Position(s) Held
with the Funds
 
Year First
Elected or
Appointed(1)
 
Principal
Occupation(s)
During Past 5 Years
 
Number
of Portfolios
in Fund Complex
Overseen by
Board Member
                   
Independent Board Members (continued):
           
                   
JOHN K. NELSON
1962
333 W. Wacker Drive
Chicago, IL 60606
 
 
 
Board Member
 
 
 
2013
Class II
 
Member of Board of Directors of Core12 LLC since 2008), a private firm which develops branding, marketing and communications strategies for clients; Director of The Curran Center for Catholic American Studies (since 2009) and The President’s Council, Fordham University (since 2010); formerly, senior external advisor to the financial services practice of Deloitte Consulting LLP (2012- 2014); formerly, Chairman of the Board of Trustees of Marian University (2010 as trustee, 2011-2014 as Chairman); formerly, Chief Executive Officer of ABN AMRO N.V. North America, and Global Head of its Financial Markets Division (2007-2008); prior senior positions held at ABN AMRO include Corporate Executive Vice President and Head of Global Markets-the Americas (2006- 2007), CEO of Wholesale Banking North America and Global Head of Foreign Exchange and Futures Markets (2001-2006), and Regional Commercial Treasurer and Senior Vice President Trading- North America (1996-2001); formerly, Trustee at St. Edmund Preparatory School in New York City.
 
 
 
195
                   
JUDITH M. STOCKDALE
1947
333 W. Wacker Drive
Chicago, IL 60606
 
 
 
Board Member
 
 
 
1997
Class I
 
Board Member, Land Trust Alliance (since 2013) and U.S. Endowment for Forestry and Communities (since 2013); formerly, Executive Director (1994-2012), Gaylord and Dorothy Donnelley Foundation; prior thereto, Executive Director, Great Lakes Protection Fund (1990-1994).
 
 
 
195
                   
CAROLE E. STONE
1947
333 W. Wacker Drive
Chicago, IL 60606
 
 
 
Board Member
 
 
 
2007
Class I
 
Director, Chicago Board Options Exchange, Inc. (since 2006); Director, C2 Options Exchange, Incorporated (since 2009); Director, CBOE Holdings, Inc. (since 2010); formerly, Commissioner, New York State Commission on Public Authority Reform (2005-2010).
 
 
 
195
                   
VIRGINIA L. STRINGER
1944
333 W. Wacker Drive
Chicago, IL 60606
 
 
 
Board Member
 
 
 
2011
Class I
 
Board Member, Mutual Fund Directors Forum; non-profit board member and former governance consultant; former Owner , and President Strategic Management Resources, Inc., a management consulting firm; former Member, Governing Board, Investment Company Institute’s Independent Directors Council; previously, held several executive positions in general management, marketing and human resources at IBM and The Pillsbury Company; Independent Director, First American Fund Complex (1987-2010) and Chair (1997-2010).
 
 
 
195
                   
TERENCE J. TOTH
1959
333 W. Wacker Drive
Chicago, IL 60606
 
 
 
Board Member
 
 
 
2008
Class II
 
Managing Partner, Promus Capital (since 2008); Director, Fulcrum IT Service LLC (since 2010), Quality Control Corporation (since 2012) and LogicMark LLC (since 2012); formerly, Director, Legal & General Investment Management America, Inc. (2008-2013); formerly, CEO and President, Northern Trust Global Investments (2004-2007); Executive Vice President, Quantitative Management & Securities Lending (2000-2004); prior thereto, various positions with Northern Trust Company (since 1994); member: Chicago Fellowship Board (since 2005), Catalyst Schools of Chicago Board (since 2008) and Chairman, and Mather Foundation Board (since 2012), and a member of its investment committee; formerly, Member, Northern Trust Mutual Funds Board (2005-2007), Northern Trust Global Investments Board (2004-2007), Northern Trust Japan Board (2004-2007), Northern Trust Securities Inc. Board (2003-2007) and Northern Trust Hong Kong Board (1997-2004).
 
 
 
195
 
88
 
Nuveen Investments

 
 

 
 
 
Name,
Year of Birth
& Address
 
Position(s) Held
with the Funds
 
Year First
Elected or
Appointed(1)
 
Principal
Occupation(s)
Including other Directorships
During Past 5 Years
 
Number
of Portfolios
in Fund Complex
Overseen by
Board Member
                   
Interested Board Members:                
                   
WILLIAM ADAMS IV(2)
1955
333 W. Wacker Drive
Chicago, IL 60606
 
 
 
Board Member
 
 
 
2013
Class II
 
Senior Executive Vice President, Global Structured Products (since 2010); formerly, Executive Vice President, U.S. Structured Products, of Nuveen Investments, Inc. (1999-2010); Co-President of Nuveen Fund Advisors, LLC (since 2011); President (since 2011), formerly, Managing Director (2010-2011) of Nuveen Commodities Asset Management, LLC; Board Member of the Chicago Symphony Orchestra and of Gilda’s Club Chicago.
 
 
 
195
                   
THOMAS S. SCHREIER, JR.(2)
1962
333 W. Wacker Drive
Chicago, IL 60606
 
 
 
Board Member
 
 
 
2013
Class III
 
Vice Chairman, Wealth Management of Nuveen Investments, Inc. (since 2011); Co-President of Nuveen Fund Advisors, LLC; Chairman of Nuveen Asset Management, LLC (since 2011); Co-Chief Executive Officer of Nuveen Securities, LLC (since 2011); Member of Board of Governors and Chairman’s Council of the Investment Company Institute; Director of Allina Health and a member of its Finance, Audit and Investment Committees: formerly, Chief Executive Officer (2000-2010) and Chief Investment Officer (2007- 2010) of FAF Advisors, Inc.; formerly, President of First American Funds (2001-2010).
 
 
 
195
                   
 
Name,
Year of Birth
& Address
 
Position(s) Held
with the Funds
 
Year First
Elected or
Appointed(3)
 
Principal
Occupation(s)
During Past 5 Years
 
Number
of Portfolios
in Fund Complex
Overseen
by Officer
                   
Officers of the Funds:                
                   
GIFFORD R. ZIMMERMAN
1956
333 W. Wacker Drive
Chicago, IL 60606
 
 
Chief
Administrative
Officer
 
 
 
1988
 
Managing Director (since 2002), and Assistant Secretary of Nuveen Securities, LLC; Managing Director (since 2004) and Assistant Secretary (since 1994) of Nuveen Investments, Inc.; Managing Director (since 2002), Assistant Secretary (since 1997) and Co-General Counsel (since 2011) of Nuveen Fund Advisors, LLC; Managing Director, Assistant Secretary and Associate General Counsel of Nuveen Asset Management, LLC (since 2011); Managing Director, Associate General Counsel and Assistant Secretary, of Symphony Asset Management LLC (since 2003); Vice President and Assistant Secretary of NWQ Investment Management Company, LLC (since 2002), Nuveen Investments Advisers Inc. (since 2002), Santa Barbara Asset Management, LLC (since 2006), and of Winslow Capital Management, LLC, (since 2010); Vice President and Assistant Secretary (since 2013), formerly, Chief Administrative Officer and Chief Compliance Officer (2006-2013) of Nuveen Commodities Asset Management, LLC; Chartered Financial Analyst.
 
 
 
196
                   
CEDRIC H. ANTOSIEWICZ
1962
333 W. Wacker Drive
Chicago, IL 60606
 
 
 
Vice President
 
 
 
2007
 
Managing Director of Nuveen Securities, LLC. (since 2004); Managing Director of Nuveen Fund Advisors, LLC (since 2014).
 
 
 
89
                   
MARGO L. COOK
1964
333 W. Wacker Drive
Chicago, IL 60606
 
 
 
Vice President
 
 
 
2009
 
Executive Vice President (since 2008) of Nuveen Investments, Inc. and of Nuveen Fund Advisors, LLC (since 2011); Managing Director- Investment Services of Nuveen Commodities Asset Management, LLC (since August 2011), previously, Head of Institutional Asset Management (2007-2008) of Bear Stearns Asset Management; Chartered Financial Analyst.
 
 
 
196
 
Nuveen Investments
 
89

 
 

 
 
Board Members & Officers (continued)

 
Name,
Year of Birth
& Address
 
Position(s) Held
with the Funds
 
Year First
Elected or
Appointed(3)
 
Principal
Occupation(s)
During Past 5 Years
 
Number
of Portfolios
in Fund Complex
Overseen
by Officer
                   
Officers of the Funds (continued):                
                   
LORNA C. FERGUSON
1945
333 W. Wacker Drive
Chicago, IL 60606
 
 
 
Vice President
 
 
 
1998
 
Managing Director (since 2005) of Nuveen Fund Advisors, LLC and Nuveen Securities, LLC (since 2004).
 
 
 
196
                   
STEPHEN D. FOY
1954
333 W. Wacker Drive
Chicago, IL 60606
 
 
 
Vice President
and Controller
 
 
 
1998
 
Managing Director (since 2014), formerly, Senior Vice President (2013-2014) and Vice President (2005-2013) of Nuveen Fund Advisors, LLC; Chief Financial Officer of Nuveen Commodities Asset Management, LLC (since 2010); Certified Public Accountant.
 
 
 
196
                   
SCOTT S. GRACE
1970
333 W. Wacker Drive
Chicago, IL 60606
 
 
 
Vice President
and Treasurer
 
 
 
2009
 
Managing Director, Head of Business Development and Strategy, Global Structured Products Group (since November 2014); Managing Director (since 2009) and, formerly, Treasurer, of Nuveen Investments Advisers Inc., Nuveen Investments Holdings, Inc., Nuveen Fund Advisors, LLC, Nuveen Securities, LLC and (since 2011) Nuveen Asset Management LLC; Vice President and, formerly, Treasurer of NWQ Investment Management Company, LLC, Tradewinds Global Investors, LLC, Symphony Asset Management LLC and Winslow Capital Management, LLC.; Vice President of Santa Barbara Asset Management, LLC; formerly, Treasurer (2006-2009), Senior Vice President (2008-2009), previously, Vice President (2006-2008) of Janus Capital Group, Inc.; Chartered Accountant Designation.
 
 
 
196
                   
WALTER M. KELLY
1970
333 W. Wacker Drive
Chicago, IL 60606
 
 
Chief Compliance
Officer and
Vice President
 
 
 
2003
 
Senior Vice President (since 2008) of Nuveen Investment Holdings, Inc.
 
 
 
196
                   
TINA M. LAZAR
1961
333 W. Wacker Drive
Chicago, IL 60606
 
 
 
Vice President
 
 
 
2002
 
Senior Vice President of Nuveen Investment Holdings, Inc. and Nuveen Securities, LLC.
 
 
 
196
                   
KEVIN J. MCCARTHY
1966
333 W. Wacker Drive
Chicago, IL 60606
 
 
 
Vice President
and Secretary
 
 
 
2007
 
Managing Director and Assistant Secretary (since 2008), Nuveen Securities, LLC; Managing Director (since 2008), Assistant Secretary since 2007) and Co-General Counsel (since 2011) of Nuveen Fund Advisors, LLC; Managing Director, Assistant Secretary and Associate General Counsel (since 2011) of Nuveen Asset Management, LLC; Managing Director and Assistant Secretary, Nuveen Investments, Inc.; Vice President (since 2007) and Assistant Secretary of Nuveen Investments Advisers Inc., NWQ Investment Management Company, LLC, Symphony Asset Management LLC, Santa Barbara Asset Management, LLC, and of Winslow Capital Management, LLC. (since 2010); Vice President and Secretary (since 2010) of Nuveen Commodities Asset Management, LLC.
 
 
 
196
 
90
 
Nuveen Investments

 
 

 
 
 
Name,
Year of Birth
& Address
 
Position(s) Held
with the Funds
 
Year First
Elected or
Appointed(3)
 
Principal
Occupation(s)
During Past 5 Years
 
Number
of Portfolios
in Fund Complex
Overseen
by Officer
                   
Officers of the Funds (continued):            
                   
KATHLEEN L. PRUDHOMME
1953
901 Marquette Avenue
Minneapolis, MN 55402
 
 
 
 
Vice President and
Assistant Secretary
 
 
 
2011
 
Managing Director, Assistant Secretary and Co-General Counsel (since 2011) of Nuveen Fund Advisors, LLC; Managing Director, Assistant Secretary and Associate General Counsel (since 2011) of Nuveen Asset Management, LLC; Managing Director and Assistant Secretary (since 2011) of Nuveen Securities, LLC; formerly, Deputy General Counsel, FAF Advisors, Inc. (2004-2010).
 
 
 
196
                   
JOEL T. SLAGER
1978
333 W. Wacker Drive
Chicago, IL 60606
 
 
 
Vice President and
Assistant Secretary
 
 
 
2013
 
Fund Tax Director for Nuveen Funds (since 2013); previously, Vice President of Morgan Stanley Investment Management, Inc., Assistant Treasurer of the Morgan Stanley Funds (from 2010 to 2013).
 
 
 
196
 
(1)
The Board of Trustees is divided into three classes, Class I, Class II, and Class III, with each being elected to serve until the third succeeding annual shareholders’ meeting subsequent to its election or thereafter in each case when its respective successors are duly elected or appointed, except two board members are elected by the holders of Preferred Shares to serve until the next annual shareholders’ meeting subsequent to its election or thereafter in each case when its respective successors are duly elected or appointed. The year first elected or appointed represents the year in which the board member was first elected or appointed to any fund in the Nuveen Complex.
(2)
“Interested person” as defined in the 1940 Act, by reason of his position with Nuveen Investments, Inc. and certain of its subsidiaries, which are affiliates of the Nuveen Funds.
(3)
Officers serve one year terms through August of each year. The year first elected or appointed represents the year in which the Officer was first elected or appointed to any fund in the Nuveen Complex.
 
Nuveen Investments
 
91
 
 
 

 
 
 
Nuveen Investments:
  Serving Investors for Generations
 

Since 1898, financial advisors and their clients have relied on Nuveen Investments to provide dependable investment solutions through continued adherence to proven, long-term investing principles. Today, we offer a range of high quality equity and fixed-income solutions designed to be integral components of a well-diversified core portfolio.
 

Focused on meeting investor needs.
 
Nuveen Investments provides high-quality investment services designed to help secure the long-term goals of institutional and individual investors as well as the consultants and financial advisors who serve them. Nuveen Investments markets a wide range of specialized investment solutions which provide investors access to capabilities of its high-quality boutique investment affiliates—Nuveen Asset Management, Symphony Asset Management, NWQ Investment Management Company, Santa Barbara Asset Management, Tradewinds Global Investors, Winslow Capital Management and Gresham Investment Management. In total, Nuveen Investments managed $233 billion as of March 31, 2015.
 

Find out how we can help you.
 
To learn more about how the products and services of Nuveen Investments may be able to help you meet your financial goals, talk to your financial advisor, or call us at (800) 257-8787. Please read the information provided carefully before you invest. Investors should consider the investment objective and policies, risk considerations, charges and expenses of any investment carefully. Where applicable, be sure to obtain a prospectus, which contains this and other relevant information. To obtain a prospectus, please contact your securities representative or Nuveen Investments, 333 W. Wacker Dr., Chicago, IL 60606. Please read the prospectus carefully before you invest or send money.
 
Learn more about Nuveen Funds at: www.nuveen.com/cef
 
Distributed by Nuveen Investments, LLC | 333 West Wacker Drive | Chicago, IL 60606 | www.nuveen.com
 
EAN-B-0215D 7183-INV-Y-04/16

 
 

 
 
ITEM 2. CODE OF ETHICS.

As of the end of the period covered by this report, the registrant has adopted a code of ethics that applies to the registrant’s principal executive officer, principal financial officer, principal accounting officer or controller, or persons performing similar functions. There were no amendments to or waivers from the Code during the period covered by this report. The registrant has posted the code of ethics on its website at www.nuveen.com/CEF/Shareholder/FundGovernance.aspx. (To view the code, click on Code of Conduct.)

ITEM 3. AUDIT COMMITTEE FINANCIAL EXPERT.

The registrant’s Board of Directors or Trustees (“Board”) determined that the registrant has at least one “audit committee financial expert” (as defined in Item 3 of Form N-CSR) serving on its Audit Committee. The registrant’s audit committee financial experts are Carole E. Stone and Jack B. Evans, who are “independent” for purposes of Item 3 of Form N-CSR.
 
Ms. Stone served for five years as Director of the New York State Division of the Budget. As part of her role as Director, Ms. Stone was actively involved in overseeing the development of the State’s operating, local assistance and capital budgets, its financial plan and related documents; overseeing the development of the State’s bond-related disclosure documents and certifying that they fairly presented the State’s financial position; reviewing audits of various State and local agencies and programs; and coordinating the State’s system of internal audit and control. Prior to serving as Director, Ms. Stone worked as a budget analyst/examiner with increasing levels of responsibility over a 30 year period, including approximately five years as Deputy Budget Director. Ms. Stone has also served as Chair of the New York State Racing Association Oversight Board, as Chair of the Public Authorities Control Board, as a Commissioner on the New York State Commission on Public Authority Reform and as a member of the Boards of Directors of several New York State public authorities. These positions have involved overseeing operations and finances of certain entities and assessing the adequacy of project/entity financing and financial reporting. Currently, Ms. Stone is on the Board of Directors of CBOE Holdings, Inc., of the Chicago Board Options Exchange, and of C2 Options Exchange. Ms. Stone’s position on the boards of these entities and as a member of both CBOE Holdings’ Audit Committee and its Finance Committee has involved, among other things, the oversight of audits, audit plans and preparation of financial statements.
 
Mr. Evans was formerly President and Chief Operating Officer of SCI Financial Group, Inc., a full service registered broker-dealer and registered investment adviser (“SCI”). As part of his role as President and Chief Operating Officer, Mr. Evans actively supervised the Chief Financial Officer (the “CFO”) and actively supervised the CFO’s preparation of financial statements and other filings with various regulatory authorities. In such capacity, Mr. Evans was actively involved in the preparation of SCI’s financial statements and the resolution of issues raised in connection therewith. Mr. Evans has also served on the audit committee of various reporting companies. At such companies, Mr. Evans was involved in the oversight of audits, audit plans, and the preparation of financial statements. Mr. Evans also formerly chaired the audit committee of the Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago.
 
ITEM 4. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES.

Nuveen Michigan Quality Income Municipal Fund

The following tables show the amount of fees billed to the Fund during the Fund’s last two fiscal years by KPMG LLP, the Fund’s current auditor (engaged on August 7, 2014), and Ernst & Young LLP, the Fund’s former auditor. The audit fees billed to the Fund for the fiscal year 2015 are the only fees that have been billed to the Fund by KPMG LLP. All other fees listed in the tables below were billed to the Fund by Ernst & Young LLP. For engagements with KPMG LLP and Ernst & Young LLP, the Audit Committee approved in advance all audit services and non-audit services that KPMG LLP and Ernst & Young LLP provided to the Fund, except for those non-audit services that were subject to the pre-approval exception under Rule 2-01 of Regulation S-X (the “pre-approval exception”). The pre-approval exception for services provided directly to the Fund waives the pre-approval requirement for services other than audit, review or attest services if: (A) the aggregate amount of all such services provided constitutes no more than 5% of the total amount of revenues paid by the Fund to its accountant during the fiscal year in which the services are provided; (B) the Fund did not recognize the services as non-audit services at the time of the engagement; and (C) the services are promptly brought to the Audit Committee's attention, and the Committee (or its delegate) approves the services before the audit is completed.

The Audit Committee has delegated certain pre-approval responsibilities to its Chairman (or, in his absence, any other member of the Audit Committee).

SERVICES THAT THE FUND’S AUDITOR BILLED TO THE FUND

 
Audit Fees Billed
   
Audit-Related Fees
   
Tax Fees
   
All Other Fees
 
Fiscal Year Ended
to Fund 1
   
Billed to Fund 2
   
Billed to Fund 3
   
Billed to Fund 4
 
February 28, 2015
$ 25,500     $ 0     $ 0     $ 0  
                               
Percentage approved
  0 %     0 %     0 %     0 %
pursuant to
                             
pre-approval
                             
exception
                             
                               
February 28, 2014
$ 24,750     $ 6,500     $ 673     $ 0  
                               
Percentage approved
  0 %     0 %     0 %     0 %
pursuant to
                             
pre-approval
                             
exception
                             
                               
1 "Audit Fees" are the aggregate fees billed for professional services for the audit of the Fund's annual financial statements and services provided in
 
connection with statutory and regulatory filings or engagements.
                         
                               
2 "Audit Related Fees" are the aggregate fees billed for assurance and related services reasonably related to the performance of the audit or review of
         
financial statements that are not reported under "Audit Fees". These fees include offerings related to the Fund's common shares and leverage.
         
                               
3 "Tax Fees" are the aggregate fees billed for professional services for tax advice, tax compliance, and tax planning. These fees include: all global
         
withholding tax services; excise and state tax reviews; capital gain, tax equalization and taxable basis calculation performed by the principal accountant.
         
                               
4 "All Other Fees" are the aggregate fees billed for products and services other than "Audit Fees", "Audit-Related Fees" and "Tax Fees". These fees
         
represent all "Agreed-Upon Procedures" engagements pertaining to the Fund's use of leverage.
                 
 
SERVICES THAT THE FUND’S AUDITOR BILLED TO THE ADVISER AND AFFILIATED FUND SERVICE PROVIDERS

The following tables show the amount of fees billed by KPMG LLP and Ernst & Young LLP to Nuveen Fund Advisors, LLC (formerly Nuveen Fund Advisors, Inc.) (the “Adviser”), and any entity controlling, controlled by or under common control with the Adviser that provides ongoing services to the Fund (“Affiliated Fund Service Provider”), for engagements directly related to the Fund’s operations and financial reporting, during the Fund’s last two full fiscal years.
 
The tables also show the percentage of fees subject to the pre-approval exception. The pre-approval exception for services provided to the Adviser and any Affiliated Fund Service Provider (other than audit, review or attest services) waives the pre-approval requirement if: (A) the aggregate amount of all such services provided constitutes no more than 5% of the total amount of revenues paid to KPMG LLP and Ernst & Young LLP by the Fund, the Adviser and Affiliated Fund Service Providers during the fiscal year in which the services are provided that would have to be pre-approved by the Audit Committee; (B) the Fund did not recognize the services as non-audit services at the time of the engagement; and (C) the services are promptly brought to the Audit Committee’s attention, and the Committee (or its delegate) approves the services before the Fund’s audit is completed.

 
Audit-Related Fees
Tax Fees Billed to
All Other Fees
 
Billed to Adviser and
Adviser and
Billed to Adviser
 
Affiliated Fund
Affiliated Fund
and Affiliated Fund
Fiscal Year Ended
Service Providers
Service Providers
Service Providers
February 28, 2015
 $                               0
 $                                     0
 $                                   0
       
Percentage approved
0%
0%
0%
pursuant to
     
pre-approval
     
exception
     
February 28, 2014
 $                               0
 $                                     0
 $                                   0
       
Percentage approved
0%
0%
0%
pursuant to
     
pre-approval
     
exception
     

NON-AUDIT SERVICES

The following table shows the amount of fees that KPMG LLP and Ernst & Young LLP billed during the Fund’s last two full fiscal years for non-audit services. The Audit Committee is required to pre-approve non-audit services that KPMG LLP and Ernst & Young LLP provides to the Adviser and any Affiliated Fund Services Provider, if the engagement related directly to the Fund’s operations and financial reporting (except for those subject to the pre-approval exception described above). The Audit Committee requested and received information from KPMG LLP and Ernst & Young LLP about any non-audit services that KPMG LLP and Ernst & Young LLP rendered during the Fund’s last fiscal year to the Adviser and any Affiliated Fund Service Provider. The Committee considered this information in evaluating KPMG LLP and Ernst & Young LLP’s independence.

   
Total Non-Audit Fees
   
   
billed to Adviser and
   
   
Affiliated Fund Service
Total Non-Audit Fees
 
   
Providers (engagements
billed to Adviser and
 
   
related directly to the
Affiliated Fund Service
 
 
Total Non-Audit Fees
operations and financial
Providers (all other
 
Fiscal Year Ended
Billed to Fund
reporting of the Fund)
engagements)
Total
February 28, 2015
 $                               0
 $                                     0
 $                                   0
 $                           0
February 28, 2014
 $                           673
 $                                     0
 $                                   0
 $                       673
         
         
"Non-Audit Fees billed to Fund" for both fiscal year ends represent "Tax Fees" and "All Other Fees" billed to Fund in their respective
 
amounts from the previous table.
       
         
Less than 50 percent of the hours expended on the principal accountant's engagement to audit the registrant's financial statements for the most recent
fiscal year were attributed to work performed by persons other than the principal accountant's full-time, permanent employees.
 

Audit Committee Pre-Approval Policies and Procedures. Generally, the Audit Committee must approve (i) all non-audit services to be performed for the Fund by the Fund’s independent accountants and (ii) all audit and non-audit services to be performed by the Fund’s independent accountants for the Affiliated Fund Service Providers with respect to operations and financial reporting of the Fund. Regarding tax and research projects conducted by the independent accountants for the Fund and Affiliated Fund Service Providers (with respect to operations and financial reports of the Fund) such engagements will be (i) pre-approved by the Audit Committee if they are expected to be for amounts greater than $10,000; (ii) reported to the Audit Committee chairman for his verbal approval prior to engagement if they are expected to be for amounts under $10,000 but greater than $5,000; and (iii) reported to the Audit Committee at the next Audit Committee meeting if they are expected to be for an amount under $5,000.
 
ITEM 5. AUDIT COMMITTEE OF LISTED REGISTRANTS.
 
The registrant’s Board has a separately designated Audit Committee established in accordance with Section 3(a)(58)(A) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (15 U.S.C. 78c(a)(58)(A)). The members of the audit committee are Jack B. Evans, David J. Kundert, John K. Nelson, Carole E. Stone and Terence J. Toth.

ITEM 6. SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS.

a) See Portfolio of Investments in Item 1.

b) Not applicable.

ITEM 7. DISCLOSURE OF PROXY VOTING POLICIES AND PROCEDURES FOR CLOSED-END MANAGEMENT INVESTMENT COMPANIES.

Nuveen Fund Advisors, LLC, formerly known as Nuveen Fund Advisors, Inc., is the registrant’s investment adviser (also referred to as the “Adviser”). The Adviser is responsible for the on-going monitoring of the Fund’s investment portfolio, managing the Fund’s business affairs and providing certain clerical, bookkeeping and administrative services. The Adviser has engaged Nuveen Asset Management, LLC (“Sub-Adviser”) as Sub-Adviser to provide discretionary investment advisory services. As part of these services, the Adviser has delegated to the Sub-Adviser the full responsibility for proxy voting on securities held in the registrant’s portfolio and related duties in accordance with the Sub-Adviser’s policies and procedures. The Adviser periodically monitors the Sub-Adviser’s voting to ensure that it is carrying out its duties. The Sub-Adviser’s proxy voting policies and procedures are attached to this filing as an exhibit and incorporated herein by reference.
 
ITEM 8. PORTFOLIO MANAGERS OF CLOSED-END MANAGEMENT INVESTMENT COMPANIES.

Nuveen Fund Advisors, LLC is the registrant’s investment adviser (also referred to as the “Adviser”).  The Adviser is responsible for the selection and on-going monitoring of the Fund’s investment portfolio, managing the Fund’s business affairs and providing certain clerical, bookkeeping and administrative services.  The Adviser has engaged Nuveen Asset Management, LLC (“Nuveen Asset Management” or “Sub-Adviser”) as Sub-Adviser to provide discretionary investment advisory services. The following section provides information on the portfolio manager at the Sub-Adviser:

The Portfolio Manager

The following individual has primary responsibility for the day-to-day implementation of the registrant’s investment strategies:
 
Name
Fund
Daniel J. Close
Nuveen Michigan Quality Income Municipal Fund.

Other Accounts Managed. In addition to managing the registrant, the portfolio manager is also primarily responsible for the day-to-day portfolio management of the following accounts:
 
Portfolio Manager
Type of Account
Managed
Number of
Accounts
Assets*
Daniel J. Close
Registered Investment Company
17
$5.20 billion
 
Other Pooled Investment Vehicles
0
$0
 
Other Accounts
12
$211 million
*
Assets are as of February 28, 2015.  None of the assets in these accounts are subject to an advisory fee based on performance.

POTENTIAL MATERIAL CONFLICTS OF INTEREST

Actual or apparent conflicts of interest may arise when a portfolio manager has day-to-day management responsibilities with respect to more than one account. More specifically, portfolio managers who manage multiple accounts are presented a number of potential conflicts, including, among others, those discussed below.

The management of multiple accounts may result in a portfolio manager devoting unequal time and attention to the management of each account. Nuveen Asset Management seeks to manage such competing interests for the time and attention of portfolio managers by having portfolio managers focus on a particular investment discipline. Most accounts managed by a portfolio manager in a particular investment strategy are managed using the same investment models.

If a portfolio manager identifies a limited investment opportunity which may be suitable for more than one account, an account may not be able to take full advantage of that opportunity due to an allocation of filled purchase or sale orders across all eligible accounts. To deal with these situations, Nuveen Asset Management has adopted procedures for allocating limited opportunities across multiple accounts.

With respect to many of its clients’ accounts, Nuveen Asset Management determines which broker to use to execute transaction orders, consistent with its duty to seek best execution of the transaction. However, with respect to certain other accounts, Nuveen Asset Management may be limited by the client with respect to the selection of brokers or may be instructed to direct trades through a particular broker. In these cases, Nuveen Asset Management may place separate, non-simultaneous, transactions for a Fund and other accounts which may temporarily affect the market price of the security or the execution of the transaction, or both, to the detriment of the Fund or the other accounts.

Some clients are subject to different regulations. As a consequence of this difference in regulatory requirements, some clients may not be permitted to engage in all the investment techniques or transactions or to engage in these transactions to the same extent as the other accounts managed by the portfolio manager. Finally, the appearance of a conflict of interest may arise where Nuveen Asset Management has an incentive, such as a performance-based management fee, which relates to the management of some accounts, with respect to which a portfolio manager has day-to-day management responsibilities.

Nuveen Asset Management has adopted certain compliance procedures which are designed to address these types of conflicts common among investment managers. However, there is no guarantee that such procedures will detect each and every situation in which a conflict arises.

Item 8(a)(3). FUND MANAGER COMPENSATION

Portfolio manager compensation consists primarily of base pay, an annual cash bonus and long term incentive payments.

Base pay. Base pay is determined based upon an analysis of the portfolio manager’s general performance, experience, and market levels of base pay for such position.

Annual cash bonus.  The Fund’s portfolio managers are eligible for an annual cash bonus based on investment performance, qualitative evaluation and financial performance of Nuveen Asset Management.

A portion of each portfolio manager’s annual cash bonus is based on the Fund’s investment performance, generally measured over the past one- and three or five-year periods unless the portfolio manager’s tenure is shorter. Investment performance for the Fund generally is determined by evaluating the Fund’s performance relative to its benchmark(s) and/or Lipper industry peer group.

A portion of the cash bonus is based on a qualitative evaluation made by each portfolio manager’s supervisor taking into consideration a number of factors, including the portfolio manager’s team collaboration, expense management, support of personnel responsible for asset growth, and his or her compliance with Nuveen Asset Management’s policies and procedures.
 
The final factor influencing a portfolio manager’s cash bonus is the financial performance of Nuveen Asset Management based on its operating earnings.

Long-term incentive compensation. Certain key employees of Nuveen Investments and its affiliates, including certain portfolio managers, have received equity interests in the parent company of Nuveen Investments. In addition, certain key employees of Nuveen Asset Management, including certain portfolio managers, have received profits interests in Nuveen Asset Management which entitle their holders to participate in the firm’s growth over time.

There are generally no differences between the methods used to determine compensation with respect to the Fund and the Other Accounts shown in the table above.

Beneficial Ownership of Securities.  As of February 28, 2015 the portfolio manager beneficially owned the following dollar range of equity securities issued by the Registrant and other Nuveen Funds managed by Nuveen Asset Management’s municipal investment team.

Name of Portfolio Manager
Fund
Dollar range of equity
securities beneficially
owned in Fund
Dollar range of equity securities
beneficially owned in the remainder of
Nuveen funds managed by Nuveen Asset
Management’s municipal investment team
Daniel J. Close
Nuveen Michigan Quality Income Municipal Fund
$0
$0

PORTFOLIO MANAGER BIO:

Daniel J. Close, CFA, is a Senior Vice President of Nuveen Investments. He joined Nuveen Investments in 2000 as a member of Nuveen’s product management and development team. He then served as a research analyst for Nuveen’s municipal investing team, covering corporate-backed, energy, transportation and utility credits. He received his BS in Business from Miami University and his MBA from Northwestern University’s Kellogg School of Management. Mr. Close has earned the Chartered Financial Analyst designation.  Mr. Close also serves as a portfolio manager for various Nuveen Build America Bond strategies. 
 
ITEM 9. PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES BY CLOSED-END MANAGEMENT INVESTMENT COMPANY AND AFFILIATED PURCHASERS.

Not applicable.

ITEM 10. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS.

There have been no material changes to the procedures by which shareholders may recommend nominees to the registrant’s Board implemented after the registrant last provided disclosure in response to this Item.

ITEM 11. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES.

(a)
The registrant’s principal executive and principal financial officers, or persons performing similar functions, have concluded that the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 30a-3(c) under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the “1940 Act”) (17 CFR 270.30a-3(c))) are effective, as of a date within 90 days of the filing date of this report that includes the disclosure required by this paragraph, based on their evaluation of the controls and procedures required by Rule 30a-3(b) under the 1940 Act (17 CFR 270.30a-3(b)) and Rules 13a-15(b) or 15d-15(b) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”) (17 CFR 240.13a-15(b) or 240.15d-15(b)).

(b)
There were no changes in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 30a-3(d) under the 1940 Act (17 CFR 270.30a-3(d)) that occurred during the second fiscal quarter of the period covered by this report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

ITEM 12. EXHIBITS.

File the exhibits listed below as part of this Form.

(a)(1)
Any code of ethics, or amendment thereto, that is the subject of the disclosure required by Item 2, to the extent that the registrant intends to satisfy the Item 2 requirements through filing of an exhibit: Not applicable because the code is posted on registrant’s website at www.nuveen.com/CEF/Shareholder/FundGovernance.aspx and there were no amendments during the period covered by this report. (To view the code, click on Code of Conduct.)

(a)(2)
A separate certification for each principal executive officer and principal financial officer of the registrant as required by Rule 30a-2(a) under the 1940 Act (17 CFR 270.30a-2(a)) in the exact form set forth below: Ex-99.CERT Attached hereto.

(a)(3)
Any written solicitation to purchase securities under Rule 23c-1 under the 1940 Act (17 CFR 270.23c-1) sent or given during the period covered by the report by or on behalf of the registrant to 10 or more persons. Not applicable.

(b)
If the report is filed under Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act, provide the certifications required by Rule 30a-2(b) under the 1940 Act (17 CFR 270.30a-2(b)); Rule 13a-14(b) or Rule 15d-14(b) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.13a-14(b) or 240.15d-14(b)), and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code (18 U.S.C. 1350) as an exhibit. A certification furnished pursuant to this paragraph will not be deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Exchange Act (15 U.S.C. 78r), or otherwise subject to the liability of that section. Such certification will not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Exchange Act, except to the extent that the registrant specifically incorporates it by reference. Ex-99.906 CERT attached hereto.


 
 

 

SIGNATURES


Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the Investment Company Act of 1940, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

(Registrant) Nuveen Michigan Quality Income Municipal Fund

By (Signature and Title) /s/ Kevin J. McCarthy
Kevin J. McCarthy
Vice President and Secretary

Date: May 6, 2015

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the Investment Company Act of 1940, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.

By (Signature and Title) /s/ Gifford R. Zimmerman
Gifford R. Zimmerman
Chief Administrative Officer
(principal executive officer)

Date: May 6, 2015
 
By (Signature and Title) /s/ Stephen D. Foy
Stephen D. Foy
Vice President and Controller
(principal financial officer)

Date: May 6, 2015