Edgar Filing: ATHEROS COMMUNICATIONS INC

Large accelerated filer

Accelerated filer

Non-accelerated filer

¨ (Do not check if a smaller reporting company)

Smaller reporting company

Form 10-Q

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

(Mark One)

x	QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended March 31, 2011

¨	TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from to

Commission File No. 0-50534

ATHEROS COMMUNICATIONS, INC.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Delaware

77-0485570

(State or other jurisdiction of

incorporation or organization)

(I.R.S. Employer

Identification No.)

1700 Technology Drive, San Jose, CA 95110-1383

(Address of principal executive offices, Zip Code)

(408) 773-5200

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes x No ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See definition of “accelerated filer, large accelerated filer, and smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act). Yes ¨ No x

As of April 25, 2011, 73,835,193 shares of Common Stock, par value $0.0005, were issued and outstanding.

Table of Contents

ATHEROS COMMUNICATIONS, INC.

INDEX TO

QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q

FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 2011



		Page

	PART I – FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1.	Financial Statements (Unaudited)		3

	Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets		3

	Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations		4

	Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows		5

	Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements		6

Item 2.	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations		18

Item 3.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk		26

Item 4.	Controls and Procedures		27

	PART II – OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1.	Legal Proceedings		28

Item 1A.	Risk Factors		28

Item 6.	Exhibits		29

Signatures			30

PART I: FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1. Financial Statements

ATHEROS COMMUNICATIONS, INC.

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(In thousands)

(Unaudited)


	March 31,			December 31,
	2011			2010
ASSETS
Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	153,461		$	130,721
Short-term marketable securities		403,038			385,080
Accounts receivable, net		108,036			103,145
Inventory		95,536			95,736
Prepaid expenses, deferred income taxes and other current assets		23,512			20,088

Total current assets		783,583			734,770
Property and equipment, net		21,084			22,103
Long-term investments		12,677			12,835
Goodwill		221,961			221,961
Acquired intangible assets, net		143,643			153,370
Deferred income taxes and other assets		9,705			9,805

Total assets	$	1,192,653		$	1,154,844

LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Current liabilities:
Accounts payable	$	42,412		$	51,768
Accrued and other current liabilities		109,391			118,465

Total current liabilities		151,803			170,233

Deferred income taxes and other long-term liabilities		90,651			89,852

Commitments and contingencies
Stockholders’ equity:
Common stock		808,390			773,914
Accumulated other comprehensive loss		(135	)		(45	)
Retained earnings		141,944			120,890

Total stockholders’ equity		950,199			894,759

Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity	$	1,192,653		$	1,154,844

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.

ATHEROS COMMUNICATIONS, INC.

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

(In thousands, except per share data)

(Unaudited)


	Three Months Ended
	March 31,
	2011			2010
Net revenue	$	245,349		$	214,705
Operating costs and expenses:
Cost of goods sold		127,202			111,315
Research and development		53,554			42,970
Sales and marketing		27,162			20,653
General and administrative		11,678			9,508
Amortization of acquired intangible assets		9,727			9,115
Acquisition-related charges		2,561			466

Total operating costs and expenses		231,884			194,027

Income from operations		13,465			20,678
Interest and other income, net		670			1,341
Change in contingent earn-out liability		7,780			—

Income before income taxes		21,915			22,019
Provision for income taxes		(861	)		(2,280	)

Net income	$	21,054		$	19,739

Basic net income per share	$	0.29		$	0.29

Shares used in computing basic net income per share		73,249			68,791

Diluted net income per share	$	0.28		$	0.27

Shares used in computing diluted net income per share		76,032			71,813

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.

ATHEROS COMMUNICATIONS, INC.

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(In thousands)

(Unaudited)


	Three Months Ended
	March 31,
	2011			2010
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
Net income	$	21,054		$	19,739
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization		2,379			1,787
Stock-based compensation		17,671			13,030
Impairment of long-term investments		87			370
Amortization of acquired intangible assets and other		10,196			11,749
Change in contingent earn-out liability		(7,780	)		—
Deferred income taxes		448			1,688
Tax benefit from employee stock-based awards		—			305
Excess tax benefit from employee stock-based awards		—			(286	)
Change in assets and liabilities:
Accounts receivable		(4,891	)		(11,806	)
Inventory		(269	)		(12,623	)
Prepaid expenses and other assets		(3,710	)		(3,269	)
Accounts payable		(8,607	)		1,187
Accrued and other liabilities		(269	)		(3,525	)

Net cash provided by operating activities		26,309			18,346

CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
Purchase of property and equipment, net		(2,324	)		(610	)
Purchase of marketable securities		(144,231	)		(107,663	)
Maturities and sales of marketable securities		126,181			47,383

Net cash used in investing activities		(20,374	)		(60,890	)

CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
Issuance of common stock		16,805			22,809
Excess tax benefits from employee stock-based awards		—			286

Net cash provided by financing activities		16,805			23,095

NET INCREASE (DECREASE) IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS		22,740			(19,449	)
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, Beginning of period		130,721			148,376

CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, End of period	$	153,461		$	128,927

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

1. Organization and Basis of Presentation

Organization— Atheros Communications, Inc. (the “Company”), was incorporated in May 1998 in the state of Delaware and commenced operations in December 1998. The Company is a developer of semiconductor system solutions for communications products.

Basis of Presentation—The accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“U.S. GAAP”) related to interim financial statements based on applicable Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) rules and regulations. Accordingly, they do not include all the information and footnotes required by U.S. GAAP for complete financial statements. This information reflects all adjustments, which are, in the opinion of the Company, of a normal and recurring nature and necessary to present fairly the statements of financial position, results of operations and cash flows for the dates and periods presented. The December 31, 2010 balance sheet was derived from the audited financial statements as of that date. All significant intercompany transactions and balances have been eliminated. The Company reclassified certain amounts reported in the previous period to conform to the current period presentation.

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities and disclosures of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of expenses during the reporting period. Actual results may differ from these estimates.

These condensed consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the Company’s audited consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2010 included in its Annual Report on Form 10-K, as filed on February 11, 2011 with the SEC (the “Annual Report”). The results of operations for the three months ended March 31, 2011 are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for any future periods.

2. Significant Accounting Policies

The Company’s significant accounting policies are disclosed in its audited consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2010 included in the Annual Report.

Product Warranty – Components of the accrual for warranty costs during the three months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010 consisted of the following (in thousands):


	Three Months Ended March 31,
	2011			2010
Beginning balance	$	3,143		$	2,605
Additions related to current period sales		773			2,007
Warranty costs incurred in the current period		(367	)		(317	)
Adjustments to accruals related to prior period sales		(1,612	)		(833	)

Ending balance	$	1,937		$	3,462

Recent Accounting Pronouncements – With the exception of those stated below, there have been no recent accounting pronouncements or changes in accounting pronouncements during the three months ended March 31, 2011, as compared to the recent accounting pronouncements described in the Annual Report that are of material significance, or have potential material significance, to the Company.

Effective January 1, 2010, the Company adopted the Financial Accounting Standards Board’s (“FASB’s”) updated guidance related to fair value measurements and disclosures, which requires a reporting entity to disclose separately the amounts of significant transfers in and out of Level 1 and Level 2 fair value measurements and to describe the reasons for the transfers. In addition, in the reconciliation for fair value measurements using significant unobservable inputs, or Level 3, a reporting entity should disclose separately information about purchases, sales, issuances and settlements (that is, on a gross basis rather than one net number). The updated guidance also requires that an entity should provide fair value measurement disclosures for each class of assets and liabilities and disclosures about the valuation techniques and inputs used to measure fair value for both recurring and non-recurring fair value measurements for Level 2 and Level 3 fair value measurements. The guidance became effective for interim or annual financial reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2009, except for the disclosures about purchases, sales, issuances and settlements in the roll forward activity in Level 3 fair value measurements, which became effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15,

2010 and for interim periods within those fiscal years. Therefore, the Company adopted the guidance with respect to the roll forward activity in Level 3 fair value measurements on January 1, 2011. The Company has updated its disclosures to comply with the updated guidance; however, adoption of the updated guidance did not have an impact on the Company’s consolidated results of operations or financial condition.

In April 2010, the FASB updated its guidance related to the milestone method of revenue recognition. The update provides guidance on the criteria that should be met for determining whether the milestone method of revenue recognition is appropriate. A vendor can recognize consideration that is contingent upon achievement of a milestone in its entirety as revenue in the period in which the milestone is achieved only if the milestone meets all criteria to be considered substantive. The updated guidance became effective on a prospective basis for milestones achieved in fiscal years, and interim periods within those years beginning on or after June 15, 2010, with early adoption permitted. Therefore, the Company adopted the updated guidance on January 1, 2011, however adoption did not have an impact on its consolidated results of operations or financial condition.

In December 2010, the FASB updated its guidance related to when to perform step two of the goodwill impairment test for reporting units with zero or negative carrying amounts. The updated guidance requires that for any reporting unit with a zero or negative carrying amount, and entity is required to perform Step 2 of the goodwill impairment test if it is more likely than not that a goodwill impairment exists. In determining whether it is more likely than not that a goodwill impairment exists, an entity should consider whether there are any adverse qualitative factors indicating that an impairment may exist. The updated guidance became effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2010. Therefore, the Company adopted the updated guidance on January 1, 2011, however adoption did not have a material impact on its consolidated results of operations or financial condition.

In December 2010, the FASB updated its guidance related to disclosure of supplementary pro forma information for business combinations. The updated guidance requires that if comparative financial statements are presented, the pro forma revenue and earnings of the combined entity for the comparable prior reporting period should be reported as though the acquisition date for all business combinations that occurred during the current year had been as of the beginning of the comparable prior annual reporting period only. The updated guidance is effective prospectively for business combinations for which the acquisition date is on or after the beginning of the first annual reporting period beginning on or after December 15, 2010, with early adoption permitted. Therefore, the Company adopted the updated guidance on January 1, 2011, however adoption did not have a material impact on its consolidated results of operations or financial condition as the updated guidance only affects disclosures related to business combinations entered into on or after January 1, 2011, and the Company did not enter into any business combinations during the three months ended March 31, 2011.

3. Business Combinations

Opulan Technologies Corporation

On August 31, 2010, the Company acquired 100% of the outstanding shares of Opulan Technologies Corporation (“Opulan”), a privately held Shanghai, China-based fabless semiconductor company that designs and sells broadband access integrated circuits (“ICs”). As a result of this acquisition, the Company has enhanced its technology portfolio to include Opulan’s Passive Optical Networking (“PON”) and broadband multiplexing (“MUX”) solutions to enable platform solutions for its networking customers and further expand its research and development capabilities in Asia.

As part of the consideration transferred at the time of the acquisition of Opulan, the Company may be required to pay up to $24,417,000 in cash to the former shareholders of Opulan as earnout consideration based upon the achievement of specified revenue and employee retention targets over the twelve month period from September 1, 2010 through August 31, 2011. The fair value of the contingent consideration was determined using a probability weighted-average analysis based on specific revenue and employee retention projections at the time of the acquisition in August 2010. As of the acquisition date, the Company determined that the fair value of the contingent consideration was $10,011,000. However, as of March 31, 2011 the Company determined that the fair value of the contingent consideration was $2,231,000 and therefore, the Company reduced its expected contingent obligation by $7,780,000. The Company will continue to assess the probability of achievement of the performance targets at the end of each reporting period, which may further impact the fair value of the contingent consideration. Consistent with the accounting for contingent consideration in a business combination, the change in the fair value is reflected in the Company’s statement of operations.

The results of operations of Opulan have been included in the Company’s consolidated statements of operations since the completion of the Opulan acquisition on August 31, 2010. For the three months ended March 31, 2010 the following table reflects the unaudited pro forma consolidated results of operations had the Opulan acquisition taken place at the beginning of 2010 (in thousands):


	March 31, 2010
Net revenue	$	218,306
Net income	$	15,584

These amounts have been calculated after applying the Company’s accounting policies and adjusting the results of Opulan to reflect the additional cost of goods sold and amortization that would have been charged assuming the fair value adjustments to inventory and intangible assets had been applied from January 1, 2010, together with the consequential tax effects.

4. Financial Instruments

The following table represents the fair value hierarchy of the Company’s financial instruments as of March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010 (in thousands):


	Fair Value Measurements as of March 31, 2011
	Total		Level 1		Level 2		Level 3
Money market funds	$	73,918	$	73,918	$	—	$	—
U.S. government debt securities		124,282		15,138		109,144		—
Corporate bonds and notes		253,776		—		253,776		—
Commercial paper		39,476		—		39,476		—
Auction-rate securities and other		3,177		—		—		3,177

Total	$	494,629	$	89,056	$	402,396	$	3,177


	Fair Value Measurements as of December 31, 2010
	Total		Level 1		Level 2		Level 3
Money market funds	$	53,321	$	53,321	$	—	$	—
U.S. government debt securities		152,600		—		152,600		—
Corporate bonds and notes		215,136		—		215,136		—
Commercial paper		17,344		—		17,344		—
Auction-rate securities		3,335		—		—		3,335

Total	$	441,736	$	53,321	$	385,080	$	3,335

The Company’s Level 1 assets consist of financial instruments for which quoted market prices for identical instruments are available in active markets.

The Company’s Level 2 asset values were based on either the last trade of the security, broker or dealer quotes or the pricing of a similar security.

The Company’s Level 3 assets consist primarily of long-term auction-rate securities representing the Company’s interest in insurance capital notes, issued by special purpose entities sponsored by insurance companies; such securities were rated AAA and AA at the date of purchase. The investment bank that organized the auctions for these securities filed for bankruptcy during the three months ended September 30, 2008, and since such time, no auctions have occurred. The Company will not be able to liquidate any of its remaining auction-rate securities until a buyer is found for these instruments or the securities are redeemed. The Company used a discounted cash flow model to value these investments.

Additionally, the Company has a $9,500,000 cost-based investment, the cost of which approximates fair value.

The following table provides a summary of changes in fair value of the Company’s Level 3 financial assets for the three months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010 (in thousands):


	Auction Rate Securities Three Months Ended March 31,
	2011			2010
Beginning balance	$	3,335		$	13,523
Total gains (losses) - realized/unrealized
Included in earnings		(87	)		(370	)
Included in other comprehensive income		(71	)		(765	)
Purchases, issuances, sales and settlements
Purchases		—			—
Issuances		—			—
Sales		—			(1,489	)
Settlements		—			—
Transfers in and/or out of Level 3		—			—

Ending balance	$	3,177		$	10,899

Total losses for the period included in earnings relating to assets still held at end of period	$	(87	)	$	(370	)

Short-term marketable securities consist of (in thousands):


	March 31, 2011
	Amortized Cost			Gross Unrealized Holding Gains			Gross Unrealized Holding Losses			Fair Value
Money market funds	$	73,918		$	—		$	—		$	73,918
U.S. government debt securities		124,274			68			(60	)		124,282
Corporate bonds and notes		253,499			460			(183	)		253,776
Commercial paper		39,471			5			—			39,476

Total		491,162			533			(243	)		491,452
Less: Amounts included in cash and cash equivalents		(88,412	)		(2	)		—			(88,414	)

	$	402,750		$	531		$	(243	)	$	403,038


	December 31, 2010
	Amortized Cost			Gross Unrealized Holding Gains			Gross Unrealized Holding Losses			Fair Value
Money market funds	$	53,321		$	—		$	—		$	53,321
U.S. government debt securities		152,572			100			(72	)		152,600
Corporate bonds and notes		214,784			469			(117	)		215,136
Commercial paper		17,344			—			—			17,344

Total		438,021			569			(189	)		438,401
Less: Amounts included in cash and cash equivalents		(53,321	)		—			—			(53,321	)

	$	384,700		$	569		$	(189	)	$	385,080

The contractual maturities of available-for-sale debt securities at March 31, 2011 are presented in the following table (in thousands):


	Amortized Cost		Fair Value
Due in one year or less	$	79,724	$	79,735
Due between one and two years		323,026		323,303

	$	402,750	$	403,038

5. Inventory

Inventory consists of (in thousands):


	March 31, 2011		December 31, 2010
Finished goods	$	45,597	$	47,068
Work-in-process		40,526		39,867
Raw materials		9,413		8,801

Total	$	95,536	$	95,736

6. Goodwill and Acquired Intangible Assets

During the three months ended March 31, 2011, there were no changes to the Company’s goodwill balance.

The carrying amounts of the acquired amortizable intangible assets as of March 31, 2011 are as follows (in thousands):


	Gross Carrying Value		Accumulated Amortization			Net Carrying Amount
Developed technology	$	163,573	$	(64,668	)	$	98,905
Customer relationships		41,767		(10,771	)		30,996
Trade name		175		(102	)		73
IPR&D		13,669		—			13,669

Total	$	219,184	$	(75,541	)	$	143,643

The Company acquired IPR&D of $17,495,000 through its acquisition of Opulan in August 2010. The fair value of the IPR&D was determined through estimates and valuation techniques based on the terms and details of the acquisition. The amounts allocated to IPR&D will not be expensed until completion of the related projects, as it was determined that the underlying projects had not reached technological feasibility at the date of acquisition. At the time of the acquisition, the IPR&D represented the Company’s next generation MUX and PON projects. The MUX project represents the next generation carrier access aggregation device. The next generation PON projects will provide higher throughput over fiber networks. During the fourth quarter of 2010, one of the related PON projects was completed and the Company began amortizing the IPR&D as developed technology when technological feasibility had been established. At March 31, 2011, the remaining PON projects and the MUX project were over 90% complete and the Company expects the projects to be completed during 2011. The estimated remaining costs to complete all projects are not material.

Amortization expense for intangible assets was $9,727,000 and $9,115,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively. At March 31, 2011 estimated amortization expense for the remainder of fiscal 2011 and years thereafter are as follows (in thousands, excluding IPR&D from the Opulan acquisition):


	Estimated Amortization Expense
2011 (remainder)	$	29,006
2012		36,453
2013		34,014
2014		25,700
2015		2,640
Thereafter		2,161

Total	$	129,974

The carrying amounts of the acquired intangible assets as of December 31, 2010 were as follows (in thousands):


	Gross					Net
	Carrying		Accumulated			Carrying
	Value		Amortization			Amount
Developed technology	$	163,573	$	(56,919	)	$	106,654
Customer relationships		41,767		(8,836	)		32,931
Covenant not-to-compete		1,327		(1,327	)		—
Trade name		175		(59	)		116
Backlog		2,428		(2,428	)		—
IPR&D		13,669		—			13,669

Total	$	222,939	$	(69,569	)	$	153,370

7. Accrued Liabilities

Accrued liabilities consist of (in thousands):


	March 31,		December 31,
	2011		2010
Accrued customer incentives	$	48,031	$	44,365
Accrued compensation and benefits		24,872		31,774
Acquisition-related contingent consideration		2,231		10,011
Other liabilities		34,257		32,315

Total	$	109,391	$	118,465

8. Standby Letters of Credit

As of March 31, 2011, the Company had standby letters of credit outstanding totaling $1,349,000 to secure operating leases for equipment. These standby letters of credit are secured by certificates of deposit, which are classified in the Company’s balance sheet as other assets.

9. Commitments and Contingencies

The Company is involved in various legal actions. The Company would record a charge equal to at least the minimum estimated liability for a loss contingency if information available prior to issuance of financial statements indicated that it is probable that an asset had been impaired or a liability had been incurred as of the date of the financial statements and the loss can be reasonably estimated. Actual liabilities in any such disputes or litigation may be materially different from the Company’s estimates, which could result in the need to record additional charges in future periods.

Wi-LAN Inc. v. Acer, Inc. et al. & Wi-LAN Inc. v. Westell Technologies, Inc. et al.

On October 31, 2007, Wi-LAN Inc. filed two complaints against the Company and thirteen of its direct and indirect customers in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division. In the complaint, Wi-LAN alleges that certain of the Company’s products infringe U.S. patent numbers 5,282,222 and RE37,802. On December 10, 2008, in response to Wi-LAN’s threat to add U.S. Patent number 6,549,759, (“ the ‘759 Patent”), assigned to Wi-LAN, to the current lawsuits, the Company and Broadcom Corporation filed a complaint for declaratory judgment against Wi-LAN Inc. in the U.S. District Court for Northern District of California, requesting that court to declare, among other things, that the ‘759 Patent is invalid, unenforceable and that the Company does not infringe any valid claims of the ‘759 Patent. This declaratory judgment action was combined with the earlier lawsuits in the Eastern District of Texas. All claims and counterclaims were dismissed with prejudice on February 7, 2011.

Wi-LAN Inc. v. Acer, Inc. et al.

On April 7, 2010, Wi-LAN Inc. also filed a complaint against the Company and 27 other defendants in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division. In the complaint, Wi-LAN Inc. alleges that certain of the Company’s products infringe U.S. Patent Number 5,515,369. All claims and counterclaims were dismissed with prejudice on February 28, 2011.

Atheros Communications, Inc. v. Lehman Brothers, Inc.

On January 30, 2009, the Company filed a Proof of Claim in the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of New York against Lehman Brothers, Inc. seeking compensatory damages incurred in connection with Lehman Brothers’ investment of the Company’s cash in auction-rate securities and resulting losses of income and liquidity, as well as punitive damages. On the same day and for related reasons, the Company filed a Customer Claim against Lehman Brothers with the federal Securities Investor Protection Corporation. There can be no assurance that the Company will obtain compensation for the Company’s claims.

U.S. Ethernet Innovations, LLC v. Acer, Inc. et al.

On October 9, 2009, U.S. Ethernet Innovations, LLC filed a complaint against a number of the Company’s customers. In its infringement contentions, U.S. Ethernet alleges that the Company’s customers’ products incorporating the Company’s products infringe U.S. Patent Number 5,299,313 (“the ‘313 Patent”). On May 28, 2010, the Company filed a Motion to Intervene in the Eastern District of Texas, Tyler Division. The court granted the motion on June 1, 2010, thereby admitting the Company into the lawsuit as a party in interest. In the Company’s complaint, the Company requested the court to declare, among other things, that the ‘313 Patent is invalid, unenforceable and that the Company does not infringe any valid claims of the ‘313 Patent. The case was transferred to the Northern District of California on August 19, 2010. There can be no assurance that the Company will be successful in seeking declaratory relief.

Broadcom Corporation et al. v. Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation

On November 10, 2009, the Company and Broadcom filed a complaint for declaratory judgment against Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation, (“CSIRO”), in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Tyler Division, requesting the court to declare, among other things, that U.S. patent number 5,487,069,(“the ‘069 Patent”), assigned to CSIRO is invalid, unenforceable and that the Company does not infringe any valid claims of the ‘069 Patent. There can be no assurance that the Company will be successful in seeking declaratory relief from CSIRO’s threat.

MOSAID Technologies Incorporated v. Dell, Inc. et al.

On March 16, 2011, MOSAID Technologies Incorporated filed a complaint against the Company and 32 other entities in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division. In its infringement contentions, MOSAID alleges that certain of the Company’s products infringe U.S. Patent Numbers 5,131,006, 5,151,920, 5,422,887, 5,706,428, 5,563,786 and 6,992,972. MOSAID seeks unspecified damages and other relief. The Company believes that it has meritorious defenses to such allegations and it intends to defend vigorously. While the Company has not yet answered the complaint, it has undertaken a study of the patents.

Azure Networks, LLC and Tri-County Excelsior Foundation v. CSR PLC et al.

On March 22, 2011, Azure Networks LLC and Tri-County Excelsior Foundation filed a complaint against the Company and eight other entities in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Tyler Division. In its infringement contentions, Azure alleges that certain of the Company’s products infringe U.S. Patent Number 7,756,129. Azure seeks unspecified damages and other relief. While the Company has not yet answered the complaint, it has undertaken a study of the patent.

Indemnifications

Pursuant to its Restated Certificate of Incorporation, the Company has entered into indemnification agreements with its directors and executive officers. These agreements require the Company to indemnify these individuals to the fullest extent permitted under Delaware law against liabilities that may arise by reason of their service to the Company, and to advance expenses incurred as a result of any proceeding against them as to which they could be indemnified. The Company has not incurred any material costs in connection with these indemnification agreements through March 31, 2011.

Under the indemnification provisions of the Company’s standard software license agreements and standard terms and conditions of semiconductor sales, the Company agrees, subject to restrictions and after certain conditions are met to defend the customer/licensee against third-party claims asserting infringement of certain intellectual property rights, which may include patents, copyrights, trademarks or trade secrets, and to pay any judgments entered on such claims against the customer/licensee. Through March 31, 2011, the Company has received a number of claims from its customers and other third parties for indemnification under such agreements with respect to alleged infringement of third-party intellectual property rights by the Company’s products. The Company has not incurred any material costs in connection with these indemnification claims through March 31, 2011. In addition, certain of the Company’s customers and other third parties have been involved in patent infringement litigation and in April 2009 agreed to settle certain of these claims. The Company has been asked by certain of these customers and other third parties and is likely to be asked by others to indemnify them for all or a portion of the losses they incur in connection with this litigation, including damages, legal expenses and settlement payments. At this time the Company is unable to determine if or when the Company would be required to make any payments under these indemnification obligations or the amount of such payments. However, the amounts of any such payments could be significant.

10. Stock-Based Compensation

Stock-Based Compensation Plans

The Company’s 1998 Stock Incentive Plan, 2004 Stock Incentive Plan, 2009 Inducement Grant Incentive Plan and 2004 Employee Stock Purchase Plan (the “ESPP”) are described in the Annual Report.

The fair value of the Company’s stock-based awards to employees was estimated using the following weighted-average assumptions for the grants made in the three months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010:


	Three Months Ended
	March 31,
Option Plan Shares	2011			2010
Estimated life (in years)		5.1			5.3
Expected volatility		27.9	%		47.1	%
Risk-free interest rate		2.0	%		2.7	%
Expected dividends		—			—
Weighted average grant-date fair value	$	12.70		$	15.64

During the three months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010 there were no purchases under the ESPP.

Stock-based Compensation Expense

The following table shows total stock-based compensation expense included in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations for the months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010 (in thousands):


	Three Months Ended
	March 31,
	2011		2010
Cost of sales	$	333		216
Research and development		8,071		6,599
Sales and marketing		6,116		4,067
General and administrative		3,151		2,148

	$	17,671	$	13,030

Management has estimated expected forfeitures and is recognizing compensation costs only for the stock-based awards expected to vest.

At March 31, 2011, the total compensation cost related to unvested stock-based awards granted to employees under the Company’s stock incentive plans but not yet recognized was approximately $178,543,000, net of estimated forfeitures. This cost will be amortized on a straight-line basis, except for performance-based awards which are amortized on a graded vesting basis, over a weighted-average period of approximately 2.7 years and will be adjusted for subsequent changes in estimated forfeitures or achievability of established milestones. Future option and restricted stock unit (“RSU”) grants will increase the amount of compensation expense to be recorded in these periods.

Stock Options and Restricted Stock Units Activity

The following is a summary of option activity for the Company’s stock incentive plans for the three months ended March 31, 2011 (in thousands, except per share amounts):


	Number of Shares			Weighted Average Exercise Price		Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Life (Years)		Aggregate Intrinsic Value
Outstanding at January 1, 2011		7,526		$	22.56
Granted		20			44.38
Exercised		(962	)		20.79
Forfeitures and cancellations		(29	)		25.07

Outstanding at March 31, 2011		6,555		$	22.87		5.88	$	142,821

Exercisable at March 31, 2011		3,922		$	19.11		4.75	$	100,209

As of March 31, 2011, 6,182,000 shares are vested and expected to vest. These shares had a weighted average exercise price of $22.42, a weighted average remaining contractual life of 5.75 years and an aggregate intrinsic value of $137,457,000.

The aggregate intrinsic value is calculated as the difference between the exercise price of the underlying awards and the quoted price of the Company’s common stock for the 6,545,000 options that were in-the-money at March 31, 2011. During the three months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010, the aggregate intrinsic value of options exercised under the Company’s stock incentive plans was $22,849,000 and $27,457,000, respectively, determined as of the date of option exercise. As of March 31, 2011, the Company had 3,835,000 authorized shares available for future issuance under all of its stock incentive plans.

The following table summarizes the Company’s RSU activity for the three months ended March 31, 2011 (in thousands, except per share amounts):


	Number of Shares			Weighted Average Grant Date Fair Value
Nonvested stock at January 1, 2011		3,275		$	26.61
Granted		2,300			44.70
Vested		(464	)		44.66
Forfeited		(34	)		32.24

Nonvested stock at March 31, 2011		5,077		$	33.12

The Company has granted restricted stock units whereby vesting is contingent upon the Company’s achievement of certain financial targets and service requirements.

The intrinsic value of restricted stock units vested was $20,719,000 and $15,392,000 in the three months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively. The total intrinsic value of all outstanding restricted stock units was $226,752,000 and $142,788,000 as of March 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively.

11. Income Taxes

As of December 31, 2010, the Company had approximately $44,228,000 of unrecognized tax benefits, substantially all of which would, if recognized, affect its tax expense. The Company has elected to include interest and penalties as a component of tax expense. The Company recorded an increase of its unrecognized tax benefits of $510,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2011. Within the next twelve months, the Company could recognize approximately $16,500,000 of existing unrecognized tax benefits as a result of the lapse of statutes of limitation, the impact of which is not expected to be material to the Company’s results of operations.

The Company recorded a tax provision of $861,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2011. The Company’s estimated 2011 effective tax rate differs from the U.S. statutory rate primarily due to profits earned in jurisdictions where the tax rate is lower than the U.S. tax rate and the benefit of the federal research and development income tax credit.

12. Net Income Per Share

Net income per share is calculated as follows (in thousands, except per share amounts):


	Three Months Ended
	March 31,
	2011		2010
Numerator:
Net income	$	21,054	$	19,739
Denominator:
Weighted average basic shares outstanding		73,249		68,791
Effect of dilutive securities		2,783		3,022

Weighted average diluted shares outstanding		76,032		71,813

Basic net income per share	$	0.29	$	0.29

Diluted net income per share	$	0.28	$	0.27

The Company excludes potentially dilutive securities from its diluted net income per share calculation when their effect would be antidilutive to net income per share amounts. The common stock equivalents related to options to purchase 683,000 and 1,092,000 shares of the Company’s common stock were excluded from the net income per share calculation in the three months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively, as their effect would have been antidilutive.

13. Comprehensive Income

The components of comprehensive income are as follows (in thousands):


	Three Months Ended
	March 31,
	2011			2010
Net income	$	21,054		$	19,739
Other comprehensive income:
Unrealized loss on investments, net of tax		(90	)		(1,082	)

Total comprehensive income	$	20,964		$	18,657

14. Segment Information, Operations by Geographic Area and Significant Customers

The Company has one operating segment, the design and marketing of semiconductors for the communications industry. The Company’s Chief Operating Decision Maker is the Chief Executive Officer.

Information regarding net revenue by target market is as follows (in thousands):


	Three Months Ended March 31,
	2011		2010
Networking	$	124,234	$	110,306
Consumer		81,612		29,465
Computing		39,503		74,934

Net revenue	$	245,349	$	214,705

Geographic Information

Net revenue consists of sales to customers in the following countries:


	Three Months Ended March 31,
	2011			2010
China		27	%		25	%
Hong Kong		25			15
Taiwan		24			30
Japan		11			11
United States		1			5
Other		12			14

Total		100	%		100	%

Significant Customers

During the three months ended March 31, 2011, Customer A and Customer B accounted for 16% and 10% of the Company’s net revenue, respectively. During the three months ended March 31, 2010, Customer A accounted for 13% of the Company’s net revenue. The Company has major concentrations of sales to a relatively small number of original design manufacturers which sell to a diversified base of end customers.

Customer A accounted for 25% and 23% of the Company’s accounts receivable balance as of March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively.

15. Merger Agreement with QUALCOMM Incorporated

On January 5, 2011, the Company entered into an Agreement and Plan of Merger (the “Merger Agreement”) by and among the Company, QUALCOMM Incorporated, a Delaware corporation (“QUALCOMM”) and T Merger Sub, Inc., a Delaware corporation and wholly owned subsidiary of QUALCOMM (“Sub”) pursuant to which Sub will merge with and into the Company, with the Company continuing as the surviving corporation and a wholly owned subsidiary of QUALCOMM (the “Merger”).

Pursuant to the terms of the Merger Agreement, at the effective time of the Merger (the “Effective Time”) each share of the Company’s common stock, $0.0005 par value per share, issued and outstanding immediately prior to the Effective Time (other than (i) shares owned by QUALCOMM, Sub or the Company and (ii) shares in respect of which appraisal rights have been properly exercised) will be canceled and will be automatically converted into the right to receive $45.00 in cash, without interest. In connection with the Merger, each outstanding option to purchase the Company’s common stock will be automatically converted into an option to purchase QUALCOMM common stock, par value $0.0001 per share, at a conversion ratio equal to a fraction having a numerator equal to $45.00 and having a denominator equal to the average closing price of QUALCOMM’s common stock as reported on the NASDAQ for the 20 trading days immediately preceding the Effective Time (the “Exchange Ratio”). In addition, each outstanding restricted stock unit award for the Company’s common stock will be automatically converted into a restricted stock unit award for QUALCOMM common stock at a conversion rate equal to the Exchange Ratio.

The Company and QUALCOMM have made customary representations and warranties in the Merger Agreement. Completion of the Merger is subject to customary closing conditions, including, but not limited to, (i) the receipt of certain foreign regulatory approvals, (ii) the absence of any order or injunction prohibiting the consummation of the Merger and (iii) truth and correctness of each party’s representations and warranties at closing. Each party is permitted to terminate the Merger Agreement under certain circumstances as set forth in the Merger Agreement.

At the special meeting of stockholders, held on March 18, 2011, the Company’s stockholders approved the Merger. However, the merger remains subject to customary closing conditions, including but not limited to the receipt of foreign regulatory approvals.

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

The following discussion of our financial condition and results of operations should be read together with the financial statements and related notes that are included elsewhere in this quarterly report. This report on Form 10-Q contains forward-looking statements, including, but not limited to, statements about our anticipated merger with QUALCOMM, our strategic opportunities, the general conditions in the semiconductor industry, our expectations regarding the benefits and features of our products, our competitive position, the markets for our products, our average selling prices, our customer base and concentration, our revenue and sources of revenue, our sales and revenue to customers in Asia, sales by original design manufacturers through to original equipment manufacturers outside Asia, anticipated impact of the natural disaster in Japan, estimated customer incentives, our estimated expenses, amortization of acquired intangible assets, cost of goods sold, projected completion of our passive optical networking, or PON, and broadband multiplexing, or MUX, products, acquisition-related charges, our effective tax rate, our anticipated cash needs, our anticipated capital expenditures and capital requirements, the adequacy of our capital resources, our needs for additional financing, the estimated market risk of our investments and foreign currency exchange risk, our auction-rate securities, our legal proceedings and our disclosure controls and procedures. These statements may be identified by such terms as “anticipate,” “will,” “expect,” “may,” “might,” “intend,” “could,” “can,” or the negative of those terms or similar expressions intended to identify forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements are subject to risks and uncertainties that may cause actual results to differ materially from those expressed or implied by the forward-looking statements. These risks and uncertainties include, but are not limited to, our ability to complete the proposed merger with QUALCOMM, the factors affecting our quarterly results, our ability to manage our growth, successful integration of recent acquisitions, our ability to sustain or increase profitability, demand for our chipsets, our reliance on third party foundries, the effect of declines in average selling prices for our products, our ability to compete in new and existing markets, acceptance of our new products, general economic conditions, and other risks discussed in Part II, Item 1, Legal Proceedings and 1A, Risk Factors, in this report. These forward-looking statements represent our estimates and assumptions only as of the date of this report. Unless required by law, we undertake no responsibility to update these forward-looking statements.

Overview

We are a global leader in innovative technologies for wireless and wired communications products that are used by a broad base of customers, including manufacturers of networking equipment, computing devices and consumer electronics devices. We combine our wireless and wired systems and software expertise with our high-performance radio frequency mixed signal and digital semiconductor design skills to provide highly integrated chipsets that are manufactured on low-cost, standard complementary metal-oxide semiconductor, or CMOS, processes. Our ability to design radios using standard CMOS processes provides us with increased manufacturing flexibility and, we believe, a competitive advantage. Our product portfolio includes solutions for Wireless Local Area Network, or WLAN, Mobile WLAN, Ethernet, Bluetooth, Global Positioning System, or GPS, Powerline Communications, or PLC, PON and MUX.

An element of our business strategy involves the acquisition of businesses, assets, products or technologies that allow us to reduce the time required to develop new technologies and products and bring them to market, incorporate enhanced functionality into and complement our existing product offerings, augment our engineering workforce, and enhance our technological capabilities. We plan to evaluate additional strategic opportunities as they arise, including acquisitions and other business combination transactions, strategic partnerships and the purchase or sale of assets. The accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements include the results of operations of the acquired companies commencing on their respective acquisition dates.

On August 31, 2010, we acquired 100% of the outstanding shares of Opulan Technologies Corporation, or Opulan, a privately held Shanghai, China-based fabless semiconductor company that designs and sells integrated circuits for broadband access solutions. As a result of this acquisition, we have enhanced our technology portfolio by adding Opulan’s PON and MUX solutions while expanding our research and development capabilities in Asia. Opulan’s results of operations and estimated fair value of assets acquired and liabilities assumed were included in our consolidated financial statements beginning August 31, 2010. The accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements include the results of operations of Opulan commencing on its acquisition date. See Note 3 of Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements for information related to the Opulan acquisition.

On January 5, 2011, we entered into an Agreement and Plan of Merger, or the Merger Agreement, by and among us, QUALCOMM Incorporated, a Delaware corporation, or QUALCOMM, and T Merger Sub, Inc., a Delaware corporation and wholly owned subsidiary of QUALCOMM, or Sub, pursuant to which Sub will merge with and into Atheros, with Atheros continuing as the surviving corporation and a wholly owned subsidiary of QUALCOMM. At the Effective Time of the Merger each share of our common stock, $0.0005 par value per share, issued and outstanding immediately prior to the Effective Time will be automatically converted into the right to receive $45.00 in cash, without interest. See Note 15 of Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements for information related to this acquisition. At the special meeting of stockholders, held on March 18, 2011, our stockholders approved the Merger. However, the Merger remains subject to customary closing conditions, including but not limited to the receipt of foreign regulatory approvals.

The semiconductor industry in which we operate is highly cyclical and has, from time to time, experienced significant downturns, often connected with, or in anticipation of, maturing product cycles of both semiconductor companies’ and their customers’ products and declines in general economic conditions. The industry experienced a significant downturn during the recent global recession. These downturns are frequently characterized by decreases in product demand, excess customer inventories, and accelerated erosion of prices. These factors could cause substantial fluctuations in the revenue and results of our operations as evidenced by the 29% and 11% sequential decreases in our revenue during the fourth quarter of 2008 and the first quarter of 2009, respectively. In addition, during these downturns some competitors may become more aggressive in their pricing practices, which would adversely impact our profitability. Any downturns in the semiconductor industry may be severe and prolonged, and any failure of the industry or communications markets to fully recover from downturns could negatively impact the revenue, business, financial condition and our results of operations. The semiconductor industry also periodically experiences increased demand and production capacity constraints, which have and may affect our ability to ship sufficient products to meet our customers’ purchase requests. In addition, because many of our suppliers are located in regions where weather and earthquake-related risks are significant, natural disasters, such as the recent earthquake in Japan, could negatively affect our ability to deliver finished goods to our customers. Accordingly, our operating results may vary significantly as a result of the general conditions in the semiconductor industry, which could cause large fluctuations in our stock price. Although we experienced sequential revenue growth during each of the six preceding quarters ended September 30, 2010 and in the first quarter of 2011, revenue in the fourth quarter of 2010 decreased as compared to the third quarter of 2010 and we may experience future revenue declines.

Revenue. Our revenue is derived primarily from the sale of wired and wireless communication chipsets. Our sales have historically been made on the basis of purchase orders rather than long-term agreements. Original equipment manufacturers, or OEMs, utilize our chipsets in developing their wireless and wired system solutions such as access points, routers, switches, personal computers, handsets, e-book readers, hand-held and console video game devices, televisions, set-top boxes, powerline adapters and personal navigation devices, or PNDs. Some OEMs purchase chipsets directly from us and manufacture their products. Other OEMs utilize original design manufacturers, or ODMs, to design and build subsystem products that the OEM then purchases from the ODM and incorporates into the OEM’s system solution. Accordingly, we ship our products either directly to the OEM or to the ODM based on the requirements of each OEM. Purchase orders are received from an OEM or an ODM and we generally recognize revenue based on the shipment of chipsets to this customer. A single ODM usually provides our chipsets to numerous OEMs. However, we attempt to maintain a close relationship with the target OEM to monitor end-market demand. Due to the use of ODMs, our direct customer base is relatively concentrated, although we believe that the number of total OEMs who purchase our chipsets through ODMs is broader. We anticipate that we may continue to experience changes in our ODM customer base as our end customers change ODMs for a variety of reasons while still using our chipsets.

We provide customer incentives to some of our direct and indirect customers. These obligations are estimated and recorded as a reduction of revenue when we ship product to the customers based on approved quotes provided to the customer. Estimating incentive amounts requires that we make judgments regarding the amount of committed incentives that will be submitted by our customers and paid by us. These estimates are adjusted on a quarterly basis to reflect actual sales data submitted by customers. These adjustments may have the effect of significantly increasing or decreasing net revenue in particular periods.

During the three months ended March 31, 2011, Customer A and Customer B accounted for 16% and 10% of our net revenue, respectively. During the three months ended March 31, 2010, Customer A accounted for 13% of our net revenue. We expect to continue to have major concentrations of sales to a relatively small number of ODM and OEM customers.

Substantially all of our sales are to customers outside the United States and Canada. Sales to customers in Asia accounted for 88% and 83% of net revenue in the three months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively. Because many of our ODM customers are located in Asia, we anticipate that a majority of our revenue will continue to come from sales to customers in that region. Although a large percentage of our sales are made to customers in Asia, we believe that a significant number of the systems designed by these customers are then sold through to OEMs outside of Asia. All of our sales are denominated in United States dollars.

Cost of Goods Sold. Cost of goods sold relates primarily to the purchase of silicon wafers, costs associated with assembly, test and inbound and outbound shipping of our chipsets, fluctuations in the price of raw materials such as gold and copper used in the manufacturing of our chips, costs of personnel, materials and occupancy associated with manufacturing support and quality assurance, royalty costs, intellectual property licenses and write downs to state inventory at the lower of cost or market caused by product obsolescence, transitions from older to newer products or significant declines in demand. Additionally, our cost of goods sold includes accruals for estimated warranty obligations, which we record when revenue is recognized. Estimated warranty obligations are adjusted each period to reflect actual warranty experience. Because we do not have long-term, fixed supply agreements, our wafer, assembly and test costs are subject to changes based on the cyclical demand for semiconductors. In addition, after we purchase wafers from foundries, we also typically bear the yield risk related to manufacturing these wafers into finished goods.

Research and Development. Research and development expense relates primarily to compensation and associated costs related to research and development employees and contractors, mask and reticle costs, prototype wafers, software and computer-aided design software licenses, intellectual property license costs, reference design development costs, development testing and evaluation costs, regulatory testing costs, testing equipment, depreciation expense and allocated occupancy costs. Research and development costs are expensed as incurred.

Sales and Marketing. Sales and marketing expense relates primarily to compensation and associated costs for marketing and sales personnel, sales commissions to independent sales representatives, public relations, promotional and other marketing expenses, expenses for travel, trade shows, depreciation and amortization and allocated occupancy costs.

General and Administrative. General and administrative expense relates primarily to compensation and associated costs for general and administrative personnel, legal and other professional fees, charges related to allowance for doubtful accounts, depreciation and amortization and allocated occupancy costs.

Amortization of Acquired Intangible Assets. Amortization of acquired intangible assets relates to acquired identified intangible assets, which are amortized on a straight-line basis over the estimated economic lives of three to five years for purchased technology, two to seven years for customer relationships and one year for trade names.

Acquisition-Related Charges. Acquisition-related charges include expenses incurred in connection with our merger and acquisition activities including severance costs related to employees terminated post acquisition and legal and filing fees.

Interest and Other Income, net. Interest and other income consists of interest earned on cash and cash equivalents and investment balances and realized gains or losses from the sale of marketable securities, as well as realized gains, net of other-than temporary impairment, or OTTI, charges on our long-term investments.

Change in Contingent Earn-out Liability. Change in contingent earn-out liability consists of a gain resulting from remeasuring our contingent consideration liability related to the acquisition of Opulan in August 2010. As part of our acquisition of Opulan, we may be required to pay cash to the former shareholders of Opulan as earnout consideration based upon the achievement of specified revenue and employee retention targets over the twelve month period from September 1, 2010 through August 31, 2011. The fair value of the contingent consideration was determined using a probability weighted-average analysis based on specific revenue and employee retention projections at the time of the acquisition in August 2010. We will continue to assess the probability of achievement of the performance targets at the end of each reporting period, which may further impact the fair value of the contingent consideration. Consistent with the accounting for contingent consideration in a business combination, the change in the fair value is reflected in our statement of operations.

Provision for Income Taxes. We make certain estimates and judgments in determining income tax expense for financial statement purposes. These estimates and judgments occur in the calculation of certain tax assets and liabilities, which arise from differences in the timing of recognition of revenue and expenses for tax and financial statement purposes and the realizability of assets in future years. U.S. income tax has not been provided on earnings of our non-U.S. subsidiaries to the extent that such earnings are considered to be indefinitely reinvested.

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

Our discussion and analysis of our financial condition and the results of operations are based on our financial statements which have been prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. The preparation of these financial statements requires us to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenue and expenses. We base our estimates on historical experience and on various other assumptions that we believe to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Actual results may materially differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions. Our critical accounting policies are discussed in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2010, as filed on February 11, 2011 with the SEC, or the Annual Report, and there have been no material changes.

Results of Operations

The following table shows the percentage relationships of the listed items from our condensed consolidated statements of operations, as a percentage of net revenue for the periods indicated.


	Three Months Ended
	March 31,
	2011			2010
Consolidated Statements of Operations Data:
Net revenue		100	%		100	%
Operating costs and expenses:
Cost of goods sold		52			52
Research and development		22			20
Sales and marketing		11			10
General and administrative		4			4
Amortization of acquired intangible assets		4			4
Acquisition-related charges		1			—

Total operating costs and expenses		94			90

Income from operations		6			10
Interest and other income, net		—			—
Change in contingent earn-out liability		3			—
Provision for income taxes		—			(1	)

Net income		9	%		9	%

Comparison of Three Months Ended March 31, 2011 and 2010

(tables presented in thousands, except percentage amounts)

Net Revenue


	Three Months Ended
	March 31,
	2011		2010		% Change
Networking	$	124,234	$	110,306		13	%
Consumer		81,612		29,465		177	%
Computing		39,503		74,934		(47	)%

Net revenue	$	245,349	$	214,705		14	%

The increase in revenue in our Networking channel during the three months ended March 31, 2011 compared with the three months ended March 31, 2010 resulted primarily from increased demand for our 802.11n wireless networking products, due to the further adoption of these products with our retail, enterprise and carrier customers, and increased demand for our Ethernet and PLC products, as well as sales of our PON and MUX solutions introduced through our acquisition of Opulan in August 2010. These increases were partially offset by decreased demand for our 802.11g and 802.11ag products and a decline in average selling prices for our 802.11n wireless networking products during the three months ended March 31, 2011 as compared with 2010.

The increase in revenue in our Consumer channel during the three months ended March 31, 2011 compared with the three months ended March 31, 2010 resulted from increased shipments of our 802.11g and 802.11n wireless networking products in e-book readers, mobile phone devices and televisions.

The decrease in revenue in our Computing channel during the three months ended March 31, 2011 compared with the three months ended March 31, 2010 resulted primarily from decreased demand for our 802.11n, 802.11g and 802.11ag wireless networking products and our Ethernet solutions. In addition, we experienced increased competition during the last six months of 2010 and the first 3 months of 2011 which adversely affected our revenue. Also, our 802.11n and Ethernet chipsets experienced decreases in average selling prices during the three months ended March 31, 2011 as compared with 2010.

We expect revenue in the second quarter of 2011 to increase compared with the first quarter of 2011 based on increased product demand in each of our channels. However, overall revenue and anticipated channel or product mix may differ from our current expectations.

Cost of Goods Sold


	Three Months Ended
	March 31,
	2011			2010			% Change
Cost of goods sold	$	127,202		$	111,315			14	%
% of net revenue		52	%		52	%

Costs of goods sold as a percentage of revenue remained relatively flat during the three months ended March 31, 2011 compared with the three months ended March 31, 2010, primarily due to a shift in product mix toward lower margin products, offset by declines in product costs related to supply chain efficiencies. We expect our cost of goods sold as a percentage of revenue to decrease in the second quarter of 2011 compared with the first quarter of 2011.

Research and Development


	Three Months Ended
	March 31,
	2011			2010			% Change
Research and development	$	53,554		$	42,970			25	%
% of net revenue		22	%		20	%

The increase in research and development expenses of $10.6 million during the three months ended March 31, 2011 compared with the three months ended March 31, 2010, was primarily due to additional compensation-related costs of $8.1 million, partly attributable to a 34% increase in the number of employees engaged in research and development activities, due in part to our Opulan acquisition in August 2010. Of the increase in compensation related costs, $1.5 million was due to an increase in stock-based compensation. We anticipate that research and development expenses will increase in the second quarter of 2011 compared with the first quarter of 2011.

Sales and Marketing


	Three Months Ended
	March 31,
	2011			2010			% Change
Sales and marketing	$	27,162		$	20,653			32	%
% of net revenue		11	%		10	%

The increase in sales and marketing expenses of $6.5 million during the three months ended March 31, 2010 compared with the three months ended March 31, 2010, was primarily due to additional compensation-related costs of $5.6 million, partly attributable to a 40% increase in the number of employees engaged in sales and marketing activities we hired to support our growth. Of the increase in compensation-related costs, $2.0 million was due to stock-based compensation. We anticipate that sales and marketing expenses will increase in the second quarter of 2011 compared with the first quarter of 2011.

General and Administrative


	Three Months Ended
	March 31,
	2011			2010			% Change
General and administrative	$	11,678		$	9,508			23	%
% of net revenue		4	%		4	%

General and administrative expenses increased $2.2 million during the three months ended March 31, 2010 compared with the three months ended March 31, 2010, primarily due to increased professional fees consisting primarily of increased legal fees of $1.3 million and additional compensation-related costs of $1.0 million. We expect that general and administrative expenses will increase in the second quarter of 2011 compared with the first quarter of 2011.

Amortization of Acquired Intangible Assets


	Three Months Ended
	March 31,
	2011			2010			% Change
Amortization of acquired
intangible assets	$	9,727		$	9,115			7	%
% of net revenue		4	%		4	%

Amortization of acquired intangible assets increased by $612,000 during the three months ended March 31, 2011 compared to the three months ended March 31, 2010, primarily due to amortization of additional intangible assets acquired as a result of our Opulan acquisition in August 2010, partially offset by certain intangible assets related to prior acquisitions that became fully amortized during 2010. We amortize acquisition-related identified intangibles on a straight-line basis over their estimated economic lives of three to five years for purchased technology, two to seven years for customer relationships, and one year for trade names. We expect that amortization of our acquired intangible assets will remain flat in the second quarter of 2011 compared to the first quarter of 2011.

We acquired IPR&D of $17.5 million through our acquisition of Opulan in August 2010. The fair value of the IPR&D was determined through estimates and valuation techniques based on the terms and details of the acquisition. The amounts allocated to IPR&D will not be expensed until completion of the related projects, as it was determined that the underlying projects had not reached technological feasibility at the date of acquisition. At the time of the acquisition, the IPR&D represented our next generation MUX and PON projects. The MUX project represents the next generation carrier access aggregation device. The next generation PON projects will provide higher throughput over fiber networks. During the fourth quarter of 2010, one of the related PON projects was completed and we began amortizing the IPR&D as developed technology when technological feasibility had been established. At March 31, 2011, the remaining PON projects and the MUX project were over 90% complete and we expect the projects to be completed during 2011. The estimated remaining costs to complete all projects are not material.

Acquisition-Related Charges

We recognized a total of $2.6 million of acquisition-related charges during the three months ended March 31, 2011 in connection with our acquisitions, consisting primarily of legal costs and professional fees in connection with the pending acquisition of Atheros by QUALCOMM. We recognized a total of $466,000 of acquisition-related charges during the three months ended March 31, 2010 in connection with our acquisition of Intellon Corporation, or Intellon, in December 2009, consisting primarily of legal and severance costs related to employees of Intellon terminated post acquisition. We expect acquisition-related charges to increase in the second quarter of 2011 as compared to the first quarter of 2011 due to the expected closing of our acquisition by QUALCOMM.

Interest and Other Income, Net


	Three Months Ended
	March 31,
	2011			2010			% Change
Interest and other income, net	$	670		$	1,341			(50	)%
% of net revenue		—	%		—	%

During the three months ended March 31, 2011, interest and other income decreased 50% compared with the three months ended March 31, 2010 due primarily to lower interest rates on our cash, cash equivalents, marketable securities and long-term investments. These decreases were partially offset by a 25% increase in our ending cash, cash equivalents and marketable securities balances as of March 31, 2011 compared to March 31, 2010, due primarily from cash flow from operations and the exercise of employee stock options, partly offset by net cash paid for the Opulan acquisition as well as expenditures for property and equipment.

Change in Contingent Earn-out Liability

Change in contingent earn-out liability consists of a gain resulting from remeasuring our contingent consideration liability related the acquisition of Opulan in August 2010. As part of our acquisition of Opulan, we may be required to pay up to $24.4 million in cash to the former shareholders of Opulan as earnout consideration based upon the achievement of specified revenue and employee retention targets over the twelve month period from September 1, 2010 through August 31, 2011. The fair value of the contingent consideration was determined using a probability weighted-average analysis based on specific revenue and employee retention projections at the time of the acquisition in August 2010. As of the acquisition date, we determined that the fair value of the contingent consideration was $10.0 million. However, as of March 31, 2011, we determined that the fair value of the contingent consideration was $2.2 million and therefore, we reduced the expected contingent obligation by $7.8 million. We will continue to assess the probability of achievement of the performance targets at the end of each reporting period, which may further impact the fair value of the contingent consideration. Consistent with the accounting for contingent consideration in a business combination, the change in the fair value is reflected in our statement of operations.

Provision for Income Taxes


	Three Months Ended
	March 31,
	2011			2010			% Change
Provision for income taxes	$	861		$	2,280			(62	)%
% of net revenue		—	%		1	%

The net provision for income taxes for the three months ended March 31, 2011, was $861,000, compared to a provision for income taxes of $2.3 million for the three months ended March 31, 2010. The provision for income taxes was derived using our estimated annual effective tax rate for 2011 and 2010, respectively. Our estimated annual 2011 effective tax rate differs from the U.S. statutory rate primarily due to profits earned in jurisdictions where the tax rate is lower than the U.S. tax rate and from the benefit of federal research and development tax credits.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Sources and Uses of Cash

Our principal source of liquidity is cash provided by operations and proceeds from sale of common stock to our employees under employee stock compensation arrangements. Cash, cash equivalents and short-term marketable securities increased from $515.8 million at December 31, 2010 to $556.5 million at March 31, 2011.

Consolidated Cash Flow Data


	Three Months Ended
	March 31,
	2011			2009
	(in thousands)
Net cash provided by (used in):
Operating activities	$	26,309		$	18,346
Investing activities		(20,374	)		(60,890	)
Financing activities		16,805			23,095

Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents	$	22,740		$	(19,449	)

Operating Activities

For the three months ended March 31, 2011, cash flow provided by operations of $26.3 million resulted primarily from our net income of $21.1 million and the following additional reasons:

•

Our net income included stock-based compensation, amortization of acquired intangible assets, depreciation, a change in our contingent earn-out liability and other non-cash charges. These non-cash charges totalled $23.0 million.

•

We invested $17.7 million in working capital for the three months ended March 31, 2011.

Working capital is comprised of accounts receivable, inventory, prepaid expenses and other current assets, accounts payable and accrued and other current liabilities. Accounts receivable increased by $4.9 million in the first three months of 2011, reflecting the timing of chipset sales and customer payments. Prepaid expenses and other current assets increased $3.7 million due primarily to increased employee contributions to our employee stock purchase plan. Accounts payable and accrued and other liabilities decreased by $8.9 million in the first three months of 2011, primarily due to the timing of inventory receipts, payments to our vendors, additions to customer incentive balances and a payout of annual variable compensation to our employees.

For the three months ended March 31, 2010, cash flow provided by operations of $18.3 million resulted primarily from our net income of $19.7 million and the following additional reasons:

•

Our net income included stock-based compensation, amortization of acquired intangible assets, depreciation and other non-cash charges. These non-cash charges totaled $28.6 million.

•

We invested $30.0 million in working capital for the three months ended March 31, 2010 primarily due to growth in inventory and receivables resulting from growth in our business.

Working capital is comprised of accounts receivable, inventory, prepaid expenses and other current assets, accounts payable and accrued and other current liabilities. Accounts receivable increased by $11.8 million in the first quarter of 2010, reflecting the timing of chipset sales and customer payments. Inventory increased $12.6 million in the first quarter of 2010 due to the timing of inventory shipments and receipts. Prepaid expenses and other assets increased by $3.3 million due primarily to increased employee contributions to our employee stock purchase plan. Accounts payable and accrued and other liabilities decreased by $2.3 million in the first quarter of 2010, primarily due to the timing of inventory received and payments to our vendors.

Investing Activities

Net cash used in investing activities of $20.4 million during the three months ended March 31, 2011 was primarily due to the purchase of marketable securities, net of proceeds from maturities, of $18.1 million. Net cash used in investing activities of $60.9 million during the three months ended March 31, 2010 was primarily due to the purchase of marketable securities, net of proceeds from maturities, of $60.3 million. Our investments are in money market funds, U.S. government notes and bonds, corporate notes and bonds, commercial paper, auction-rate securities and other cost-based investments.

We purchased $2.3 million and $610,000 of property and equipment in the three months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively.

Financing Activities

Net cash provided by financing activities consisted primarily of proceeds from stock option exercises of $16.8 million and $22.8 million in the three months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively.

Liquidity

We expect to experience an increase in our operating costs and expenses in absolute dollars for the foreseeable future in order to execute our business strategy. As a result, we anticipate that operating costs and expenses, as well as planned capital expenditures, will constitute a material use of our cash resources.

We believe that our existing cash, cash equivalents and short-term marketable securities will be sufficient to meet our anticipated cash needs for at least the next 12 months. Our future capital requirements will depend on many factors including our rate of revenue growth, the timing and extent of spending to support development efforts, the expansion of sales and marketing activities, the timing of introductions of new products and enhancements to existing products, the costs to ensure access to adequate manufacturing capacity, the continuing market acceptance of our products and the expenditures associated with possible future acquisitions or other business combination transactions.

Contractual Obligations and Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

Information regarding our contractual obligations is provided in the “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Results of Operations and Financial Condition” section of our Annual Report. We recorded $620,000 of additional liability due to unrecognized tax benefits in the three months ended March 31, 2011, and to date we have recorded a total of $31.4 million of unrecognized tax benefits as of March 31, 2011. Within the next twelve months, we could recognize approximately $16.5 million of our existing unrecognized tax benefits as a result of the lapse of statutes of limitations, the impact of which is not expected to be material to our results of operations.

As of March 31, 2011, we have no off-balance sheet arrangements as defined in Item 303(a)(4) of the SEC’s Regulation S-K.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

For a discussion of recent accounting pronouncements, refer to Note 2 to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk

The primary objectives of our investment activities are, in order of importance, to preserve principal, provide liquidity and maximize income without significantly increasing risk. As of March 31, 2011, our investments were primarily in money market funds, corporate notes, corporate bonds, commercial paper, U.S. government securities and to a lesser extent, auction-rate securities and other cost-based investments. Some of the securities we invest in are subject to market risk. This means that a change in prevailing interest rates may cause the principal amount of the investment to fluctuate. To minimize this risk, we maintain our portfolio of cash equivalents and short-term investments in a variety of securities, including money market funds and government and non-government debt securities. Our long-term investments include auction-rate securities, which have been classified as long-term due to the lack of a liquid market for these securities. The risk associated with fluctuating interest rates is limited to our investment portfolio and we believe that a 10% change in interest rates will not have a significant impact on the fair value of our portfolio or on our interest income.

Currently, our direct exposure to foreign exchange rate fluctuations for revenues and cost of goods sold is not material. Our sales agreements generally provide for pricing and payment in U.S. dollars and, therefore, are not subject to exchange rate fluctuations. Similarly, the majority of our purchases related to cost of goods sold are denominated and paid in U.S. dollars and, therefore, are not subject to exchange rate fluctuations. The risk associated with fluctuating currency exchange rates is generally limited to our operating costs and expenses and capital expenditures denominated in currencies other than the U.S. dollar as over 50% of our employees are located outside of the U.S. Increases or decreases in the value of the U.S. dollar relative to other currencies could make our products more or less expensive, which could have an impact on our business. Future fluctuations in currency exchange rates could have a material impact on our business.

We do not currently engage in foreign currency hedging transactions, nor do we believe that we currently have material exposure to foreign currency exchange rate risk.

As of March 31, 2011, we had standby letters of credit outstanding totaling $1.3 million to secure operating leases for equipment. These standby letters of credit are secured by certificates of deposit.

Item 4. Controls and Procedures

(a) Evaluation of disclosure controls and procedures. We maintain “disclosure controls and procedures,” as such term is defined in Rule 13a-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, or the Exchange Act, that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in Securities and Exchange Commission rules and forms and that such information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate, to allow for timely decisions regarding required disclosure. In designing and evaluating our disclosure controls and procedures, management recognized that disclosure controls and procedures, no matter how well conceived and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the objectives of the disclosure controls and procedures are met. Our disclosure controls and procedures have been designed to meet the reasonable assurance standards. Additionally, in designing disclosure controls and procedures, our management necessarily was required to apply its judgment in evaluating the cost-benefit relationship of possible disclosure controls and procedures. The design of any disclosure controls and procedures also is based in part upon certain assumptions about the likelihood of future events, and there can be no assurance that any design will succeed in achieving its stated goals under all potential future conditions.

Based on their evaluation as of the end of the period covered by this quarterly report on Form 10-Q, our Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer and Chief Accounting Officer have concluded that, as of such date, our disclosure controls and procedures were effective at the reasonable assurance level.

(b) Changes in internal control over financial reporting. There were no changes in internal control over financial reporting during the quarter ended March 31, 2011 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

PART II - OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1. Legal Proceedings

Please see Part I, Item 1, Note 9 of the Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements for a discussion of our legal proceedings. For an additional discussion of certain risks associated with legal proceedings, see the section entitled “Risk Factors” in Item 1A of our Annual Report.

Item 1A. Risk Factors

This Report contains forward-looking statements that are subject to risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from those projected. These risks and uncertainties include, but are not limited to, the risk factors set forth below and the risk factors set forth in our Annual Report, and this Report should be read in conjunction with such risk factors. The risks and uncertainties described in the Annual Report are not the only ones we face. Additional risks and uncertainties not presently known to us or that we currently believe are immaterial may also affect our business. If any of these known or unknown risks or uncertainties actually occurs and have material adverse effects on Atheros, our business, financial condition and results of operations could be seriously harmed.

The failure to complete the proposed merger with QUALCOMM could adversely affect our business.

On January 5, 2011, we entered into the Merger Agreement with QUALCOMM, pursuant to which a wholly owned subsidiary of QUALCOMM will merge with and into us, and we will continue as the surviving corporation and become a wholly owned subsidiary of QUALCOMM, or the Merger. The Merger is subject to customary closing conditions, including but not limited to the receipt of foreign regulatory approvals. There is no assurance that the Merger with QUALCOMM will occur. If the proposed Merger is not completed, the share price of our common stock may drop to the extent that the current market price of our common stock reflects an assumption that a transaction will be completed. In addition, under circumstances defined in the Merger Agreement, we may be required to pay a termination fee of up to $103.7 million. Further, a failed transaction may result in negative publicity and a negative impression of us in the investment community and could adversely impact our relationship with our customers or suppliers. Finally, the pending Merger could result in disruptions to our business, and any such disruptions could continue or accelerate in the event the Merger is not consummated. There can be no assurance that our business, these relationships or our financial condition would not be adversely affected, as compared to the condition prior to the announcement of the Merger, as a result of the announcement or if the Merger is not consummated. While we currently expect the transaction to close in the second quarter of 2011 and we have received shareholder approval, we cannot provide assurance that the transaction will be ultimately consummated.

Our headquarters are located in California, and we have sales offices throughout Asia, and research and development facilities in California, Florida, India, Taiwan and China. Our third-party foundries and subcontractors are concentrated in Asia and elsewhere in the Pacific Rim and Israel. These areas are subject to significant weather and in some locations, earthquake-related risks. Any disruption to the operations of these offices, foundries and subcontractors resulting from typhoons, hurricanes, earthquakes or other natural disasters could cause significant delays in the development, production, shipment and sales of our products. For example, during the first quarter of 2011, Japan experienced severe earthquakes and a tsunami which could cause disruptions in our supply chain and adversely impact our ability, and the ability of our partners, to deliver finished goods to customers.

Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Corporation, Semiconductor Manufacturing International Corporation, GlobalFoundries Inc., United Microelectronics Corporation, Silterra Malaysia Sdn. Bhd., and other foundries we may use in the future, which manufacture our chipsets, and subcontractors which perform substantially all of our assembly and testing, are located in Asia. Tower Semiconductor Ltd., which also manufactures our chipsets, is located in Israel. In addition, our headquarters are located in Northern California, and we have sales offices in Japan, Taiwan, Hong Kong, China and elsewhere in Asia, research and development facilities in Southern California, Florida, India, Taiwan and China and administrative offices in Macao. These areas are subject to hurricanes or typhoons, and the risk of an earthquake or an earthquake-related disaster such as a tsunami in the Pacific Rim region, the Indian Ocean region, or the Middle East, is significant due to the proximity of major earthquake fault lines. For example, in March 2011, Japan experienced several major earthquakes and a tsunami. These events have affected Japan’s infrastructure, caused power outages and disrupted business activities. Though our facilities in Japan suffered only nominal facility damages, our supply chain and customers are dependent on certain Japanese suppliers. While we typically carry additional inventory to meet the fluctuating demands of our customers, any delays in product delivery from Japanese suppliers may have an adverse effect on our ability to deliver our products to our customers, which could negatively impact our future financial results. Similarly, major earthquakes in Taiwan in the past have disrupted the facilities of several of these third-party contractors, as well as other providers of these services, and impaired their production capacity. In addition, a tsunami in December 2004 caused widespread destruction and disruption of business in India and throughout the Indian Ocean coastal region. The occurrence of additional earthquakes or other

natural disasters could result in the disruption of our foundry, assembly and test capacity or research and development efforts, or our ability to market and sell our products. We may not be able to obtain alternate capacity on favorable terms, if at all and our research and development efforts could be slowed.

Item 6. Exhibits


Exhibit Number		Description

2.1		Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of January 5, 2011, by and among the Registrant, QUALCOMM Incorporated, a Delaware corporation, and T Merger Sub, Inc., a Delaware corporation and wholly owned subsidiary of QUALCOMM (filed as Exhibit 2.1 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on January 5, 2011, and incorporated herein by reference).

10.1		Offer Letter, dated December 7, 2010, by and between the Registrant and Dennis Kish.

10.2		Severance and Change in Control Agreement, dated December 7, 2010, by and between the Registrant and Dennis Kish.

31.1		Certificate of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350).

31.2		Certificate of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350).

32.1(1)		Certificate of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350).

32.2(1)		Certificate of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350).

101.INS(2)		XBRL Instance Document

101.SCH(2)		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document

101.CAL(2)		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document

101.LAB(2)		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document

101.PRE(2)		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document

(1)

The material contained in Exhibit 32.1 and Exhibit 32.2 is not deemed “filed” with the SEC and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, whether made before or after the date hereof and irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing, except to the extent that the registrant specifically incorporates it by reference.

(2)

Pursuant to applicable securities laws and regulations, we are deemed to have complied with the reporting obligation relating to the submission of interactive data files in such exhibits and are not subject to liability under any anti-fraud provisions of the federal securities laws as long as we have made a good faith attempt to comply with the submission requirements and promptly amend the interactive data files after becoming aware that the interactive data files fail to comply with the submission requirements. Users of this data are advised that, pursuant to Rule 406T, these interactive data files are deemed not filed and otherwise are not subject to liability.

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

Date: April 29, 2011

ATHEROS COMMUNICATIONS, INC.

/s/ Craig H. Barratt

Craig H. Barratt

President and Chief Executive Officer

(Principal executive officer)

/s/ Jack R. Lazar

Jack R. Lazar

Chief Financial Officer, Senior Vice President of Corporate Development, and Secretary

(Duly authorized officer and principal financial officer)

/s/ David D. Torre

David D. Torre

Vice President and Chief Accounting Officer

(Duly authorized officer and principal accounting officer)

Exhibit Index


Exhibit Number		Description

2.1		Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of January 5, 2011, by and among the Registrant, QUALCOMM Incorporated, a Delaware corporation, and T Merger Sub, Inc., a Delaware corporation and wholly owned subsidiary of QUALCOMM (filed as Exhibit 2.1 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on January 5, 2011, and incorporated herein by reference).

10.1		Offer Letter, dated December 7, 2010, by and between the Registrant and Dennis Kish.

10.2		Severance and Change in Control Agreement, dated December 7, 2010, by and between the Registrant and Dennis Kish.

31.1		Certificate of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350).

31.2		Certificate of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350).

32.1(1)		Certificate of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350).

32.2(1)		Certificate of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350).

101.INS(2)		XBRL Instance Document

101.SCH(2)		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document

101.CAL(2)		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document

101.LAB(2)		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document

101.PRE(2)		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document

(1)

(2)