UNITED STATES
                       SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
                             Washington, D.C. 20549

                                   FORM 10-K/A
                                 Amendment No. 1

       |X|  ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES
                               EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

                   For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2005

                                       OR

      |_|   TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
                         SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

              For the transition period from _________ to _________

                         Commission file number 0-19292

                              BLUEGREEN CORPORATION
             (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

           Massachusetts                                      03-0300793
  (State or other jurisdiction of                          (I.R.S. Employer
  incorporation or organization)                          Identification No.)

         4960 Conference Way North, Suite 100, Boca Raton, Florida 33431
               (Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code)

       Registrant's telephone number, including area code: (561) 912-8000

Securities Registered Pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

    Title of each class              Name of each exchange on which registered
    -------------------              -----------------------------------------

Common Stock, $.01 par value       New York Stock Exchange, Archipelago Exchange

Securities Registered Pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None.

      Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer,
as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes |_| No |X|

      Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports
pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. Yes |_| No |X|

      Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports
required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the
registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such
filing requirements for the past 90 days.

            Yes |X|   No |_|



      Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item
405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the
best of registrant's knowledge, in the definitive proxy statement incorporated
by reference into Part III of this Form 10-K. |_|

      Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated
filer, an accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer (as defined in Rule
12b-2 of the Act).

Large Accelerated filer |_|    Accelerated filer |X|   Non-Accelerated filer |_|

      Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as
defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act). Yes |_| No |X|

      State the aggregate market value of the voting and non-voting common
equity held by non-affiliates of the registrant: $360,956,342 based upon the
closing sale price of the Company's Common Stock on the New York Stock Exchange
on June 30, 2005 ($17.41 per share). For this purpose, "affiliates" include
members of the Board of Directors of the Company, members of executive
management and all persons known to be the beneficial owners of more than 5% of
the Company's outstanding common stock.

      As of March 14, 2006, there were 30,512,651 shares of the registrant's
common stock, $.01 par value, outstanding.

                       DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

      Specifically identified portions of the Company's definitive proxy
statement to be filed for its 2006 Annual Meeting of Shareholders (the "Proxy
Statement") are incorporated by reference into Part III hereof.

                                EXPLANATORY NOTE

We are filing this Amendment No. 1 to our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the
fiscal year ended December 31, 2005, as filed with the U.S. Securities and
Exchange Commission (SEC) on March 16, 2006 to amend the disclosure in Item 9A
related to "Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting" for fiscal
year ending December 31, 2005.

Other than the amendment of Item 9A, all other information included in the above
described Form 10-K as previously filed, remains unchanged. In connection with
the filing of this Form 10-K/A and pursuant to Rules 12b-15, 13a-14(a) and
13a-14(b) under the Exchange Act, we are including currently dated
certifications.

This Form 10-K/A does not reflect events occurring after the filing of our
Annual Report on Form 10-K on March 16, 2006 or include, or otherwise modify or
update the disclosure contained therein in any way other than to reflect the
amendment of Item 9A.



Item 9A. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES.

Management,  including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial  Officer,
does not  expect  that our  disclosure  controls  and  procedures  and  internal
controls will prevent all errors and all improper conduct.  A control system, no
matter how well  conceived  and  operated,  can  provide  only  reasonable,  not
absolute,  assurance that the objectives of the control system are met. Further,
the design of a control  system must  reflect  the fact that there are  resource
constraints,  and the benefits of controls must be considered  relative to their
costs. Because of the inherent limitations in all control systems, no evaluation
of controls can provide  absolute  assurance  that we have  detected all control
issues and instances of improper  conduct,  if any. These  inherent  limitations
include the realities that judgments in decision-making  can be faulty, and that
breakdowns can occur because of simple error or mistake. Additionally,  controls
can be circumvented by the individual acts of some persons,  by collusion of two
or more people, or by management override of the control.

Further,  the  design  of any  system  of  controls  also is based in part  upon
assumptions about the likelihood of future events, and there can be no assurance
that any design will succeed in achieving  its stated goals under all  potential
future conditions;  over time, controls may become inadequate because of changes
in conditions,  or the degree of compliance  with the policies or procedures may
deteriorate.  Because of the inherent  limitations in a  cost-effective  control
system, misstatements due to error or fraud may occur and not be detected.

Conclusion Regarding the Effectiveness of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

Under the supervision and with the  participation  of our management,  including
our Chief  Executive  Officer  and Chief  Financial  Officer,  we  conducted  an
evaluation  of  the  design  and  operation  of  our  "disclosure  controls  and
procedures",  as such term is defined under Rule 13a-15(e) promulgated under the
Exchange  Act as of  December  31,  2005.  Based on this  evaluation,  our Chief
Executive  Officer and Chief  Financial  Officer  concluded  that our disclosure
controls and procedures were effective as of December 31, 2005.

Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

During the fourth quarter of 2005, in anticipation of the sale of certain of our
vacation ownership notes receivable, we implemented additional internal controls
relating to (1) the review and evaluation of sales of vacation  ownership  notes
receivable to determine if the proposed  structures  would allow for off-balance
sheet  treatment  under SFAS No. 140 and (2) the  evaluation of the  appropriate
initial and continuing  accounting for such transactions.  As the fourth quarter
securitization  included a component of a previous purchase  facility,  a review
was performed to determine if the purchase facility was appropriately treated as
a sale as originally  reported.  Based on our review,  we determined that, among
other things,  the relevant  provisions of the previous  purchase  facility were
arguably ambiguous and could be construed to allow the Company to substitute new
notes  receivable for previously sold  receivables  for any reason.  As such, we
concluded that the existence of the ambiguous  provisions  should have precluded
notes receivable  sales under the purchase  facility from being accounted for as
off-balance  sheet sales  transactions.  As a result,  the  Company  felt it was
prudent to reassess all prior securitizations and vacation ownership receivables
purchase facilities to determine if GAAP was applied appropriately.  As a result
of this review, we identified that we had originally  misapplied GAAP in various
purchase  facilities  during certain periods prior to the fourth quarter of 2005
and that there were material  weaknesses in internal control over these types of
transactions.  As a result, we determined that we would restate our consolidated
financial  statements for the first three quarters of fiscal 2005 and the fiscal
years ended December 31, 2003 and 2004 (see Note 2 to the Consolidated Financial
Statements)  to reflect the impact of treating such  transactions  as on-balance
sheet  financings  and to correct the initial gain  computations  and continuing
accounting on those transactions that were properly treated as off-balance sheet
transactions.  We believe that, as of December 31, 2005, we had fully remediated
the  control  deficiencies  relating  to the sale of  vacation  ownership  notes
receivable that led to the restatement of the periods prior to fourth quarter of
2005.