form10k.htm
UNITED
STATES
SECURITIES
AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON,
D.C. 20549
FORM
10-K
|
T
|
ANNUAL
REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF
1934
|
For the
fiscal year ended July 31, 2009
|
£
|
TRANSITION
REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF
1934
|
For the
transition period
from ____________________ to ____________________
Commission
file number 000-19608
ARI
Network Services, Inc.
(Name of
small business issuer in its charter)
|
WISCONSIN
|
|
39- 1388360
|
|
|
(State
or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)
|
|
(IRS
Employer Identification No.)
|
|
10850 West Park Place, Suite
1200, Milwaukee, Wisconsin 53224
(Address
of principal executive office)
Issuer's
telephone number (414) 973-4300
Securities
registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: None
Securities
registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:
Common
Stock, par value $0.001 per share
(Title of
Class)
Indicate
by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in
Rule 405 of the Securities Act
Yes No ü
Indicate
by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to
Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act.
Yes No ü
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant (1) filed all reports required to be filed
by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the
preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required
to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for
the past 90 days.
Yes ü No
Indicate
by checkmark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on
its corporate website, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be
submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding
12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit
and post such files).
Yes No
Indicate
by check if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation
S-K (S229.405 of this chapter) is not contained herein, and will not
be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or
information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K
or any amendment to this Form 10-K. £
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an
accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting
company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer”,
“accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act. (Check one):
|
Large
accelerated filer |
|
Accelerated
filer
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-accelerated
filer
|
|
Smaller
reporting company ü
|
(Do
not check if a smaller reporting company) |
|
|
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule
12b-2 of the Exchange Act).
Yes No ü
As of
January 31, 2009, the aggregate market value of the Common Stock held by
non-affiliates (based on the closing price on the NASDAQ OTC bulletin board) was
approximately $4.8 million.
As of
October 16, 2009, there were 7,751,842 shares of the registrant’s shares
outstanding.
DOCUMENTS
INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
Portions
of the Definitive Proxy Statement, to be filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission no later than 120 days after July 31, 2009, for the 2009 Annual
Meeting of Shareholders are incorporated by reference in Part III
hereof.
ARI Network Services, Inc.
FORM
10-K
FOR THE
FISCAL YEAR ENDED JULY 31, 2009
INDEX
Item 1. Description of the
Business
Overview
ARI
Network Services, Inc. (the “Company” or “ARI”) is a leading provider of
technology enabled services that help dealers, distributors and manufacturers
reduce costs and increase sales in selected vertical
markets. Specifically, ARI provides electronics parts catalogs,
dealer e-commerce solutions, professional services and outsourced finance and
insurance ("F&I") services in about a dozen vertical markets worldwide,
including outdoor power, power sports, motorcycles, marine, recreational
vehicles ("RV"), appliances, agricultural equipment, floor maintenance
and construction. ARI currently serves more than 20,000 dealers,
100 manufacturers and 150 distributors in more than 100 countries
worldwide.
Manufacturers
and distributors drive revenue, efficiency and customer satisfaction by
leveraging ARI’s technology enabled services and dealer relationships, and look
to ARI as a partner to reach their dealers. Dealers rely on ARI’s technology
enabled services and extensive network of manufacturer and distributor
relationships to obtain content and technology solutions, which result in
improved revenue, efficiency and customer satisfaction.
Our
technology enabled services allow our customers in a service and distribution
network to: (i) conveniently reference parts, service bulletins and other
technical information; (ii) efficiently market to their customers and prospects;
and (iii) increase revenues by selling products online.
ARI
operates primarily in two geographic segments: the U.S. and
Netherlands-based European operations. Each provides technology
enabled services that connect manufacturers in selected industries with their
service and distribution networks. Segment operating information is provided to
the Company’s chief operating decision makers.
An
important element of ARI’s business is its relationship with over 75 dealer
business management system providers through our COMPASS Partners™
program. A dealer business management system is used by a dealer to
manage inventory, maintain accounting records, bill customers and focus
marketing efforts. ARI’s ability to interface with these systems
provides the dealer with a more robust, informative, and cost-effective
solution.
No single
customer accounted for 10% or more of ARI’s revenue in fiscal 2009 or fiscal
2008.
Our
executive offices are located at 10850 West Park Place, Suite 1200, Milwaukee,
Wisconsin 53224, and our telephone number at that location is (414)
973-4300. ARI is a Wisconsin corporation and was incorporated in
1981. We maintain a website at www.arinet.com, which is not part of
this report.
Mission
and Strategy
ARI's
mission is to be recognized as the leader in creating, marketing and supporting
the best solutions that enhance revenue or reduce costs for our
customers. We intend to continue to focus on our catalog, marketing
services and professional services businesses and continuously seek to add new
products that fit our overall strategy, while meeting our criteria of providing
technology enabled services that help our customers sell more products and
services. We intend to continue pursuing products that meet our
customers' needs and produce recurring revenue and/or a high number of
transactions with attractive gross margins.
To
achieve this vision, our strategy is to concentrate on a few key vertical
markets, and to be the leading provider of technology enabled services in those
markets. Our goal is to provide a complete array of technology
enabled services, including our existing electronic catalog and e-commerce
enabled websites as well as new services, which industry participants will adopt
and use effectively.
To
maintain and enhance the current base of catalog business, we seek to maintain a
renewal rate in North America of approximately 90% on existing dealer catalog
subscriptions and to sell new catalogs and dealers at a rate sufficient to
replace or increase the revenue from non-renewing subscriptions. We
believe that we are highly penetrated in our four primary markets (outdoor
power, power sports (including motorcycles), marine and appliances) both in
terms of dealers and catalog titles, and that there are opportunities for
additional growth in related markets as well as the introduction of new products
into our current markets.
Our
primary growth area in North America is marketing services, which includes
WebsiteSmart ProÒ,
ARI MailSmart™, Footsteps™,
SearchEngineSmart™, and additional
add-on products and marketing professional services. These products
respond directly to our customers’ desire for assistance from a trusted partner
like ARI in marketing and selling to their customers and prospects around the
clock via the Internet, growing their revenue through both online sales and
additional in-store traffic. Customers utilizing our e-commerce
enabled platforms for more than one year are enjoying, on average, substantial
year over year sales growth through their websites. We continue to
invest in additional sales and marketing and product development resources to
support our growth in this area.
In ARI’s
Netherlands-based European operations, our focus is to adapt our success in the
U.S. electronic catalog market to our European-based customers through a
combination of direct and indirect business relationships with manufacturers and
dealers. We believe that this will position us for growth in the
future by leveraging what we do well while being responsive to the local
operating requirements within the various European countries and to our
manufacturer customers’ need for a partner with global reach.
Finally,
we continue to seek acquisitions and other business development opportunities
that will solidify or accelerate our market position in electronic parts
catalogs and marketing services, as well as potential new product
areas.
Products
and Services
ARI
offers four basic types of products and services to our customers: (i) electronic catalogs for
publishing and viewing technical reference information about the equipment; (ii)
marketing services,
including website creation, lead management, and email marketing, all of which
are designed to allow dealers to grow their businesses and increase
profitability through efficient and effective marketing of their products; (iii)
professional services,
including project management, data conversion, software customization and
help desk support services; and (iv) outsourced F&I services,
which facilitate dealers' sales by obtaining financing for their customers and
providing them with after-sale products such as extended
warranties. For a complete listing of the products and services
offered and for more information visit the Company's website at
www.arinet.com.
Electronic
Catalog Products and Services
ARI’s
PartSmart® and
PartSmart® WebTM electronic
cataloging suite of products and services enable partners in a service and
distribution network to look up electronic technical reference information, such
as illustrated parts lists, service bulletins, price files, repair instructions
and other technical information regarding the products of multiple
manufacturers. Products and services offered include:
PartSmart® and PartSmart® WebTM Electronic
and web-based parts catalogs for equipment dealers that allow dealers access to
more than 440 leading supplier catalogs from a single application and reduces
parts lookup time by more than 50%. A number of add-on products are
available, including PartSmart® CartTM, which
facilitates order taking directly from the catalog.
PartSmart® Data ManagerTM. An
electronic parts catalog creation tool used to produce catalogs for viewing on
PartSmartÒ
products. Several add-on products are also available for use with
PartSmartÒ Data
ManagerTM.
PartStreamTM. The
newest member of our suite of electronic catalog products and services,
PartStream™ is a modular consumer-focused illustrated parts lookup application
that integrates with existing website platforms and carts that allows consumers
to quickly identify the desired part, add the part to their shopping cart and
check out.
Marketing
Services
ARI's
technology enabled suite of marketing services allow dealers and manufacturers
to quickly establish an online presence and to reach beyond typical geographic
constraints and extend their store hours, allowing their customers to look up
and order parts and accessories 24 hours a day, 7 days a week. These
technology enabled services allow dealers to grow their business and increase
profitability through efficient and effective marketing of their products,
capturing visitor information, and then managing leads into customer
relationships. Services offered include:
Website Suite of
Products. ARI's suite of website services includes: (i)
WebsiteSmart ProÒ, software
used to create customized websites and conduct business electronically, which
also includes an optional shopping cart feature; (ii) eXcelerateProTM and
eXcelerateProTM 2,
which are available customized or from a design gallery and offer full web site
capabilities; (iii) LeadStormTM, the newest
website product that includes lead generation and inventory search engine
optimization features; and (iv) eXcelerateTM Pro
Mobile, which allows customers' websites to be fully functional on smart mobile
phones.
FootstepsTM. New to ARI,
Footstepsä
is a lead management and CRM tool that helps customers follow up on incoming
leads more quickly and professionally. It also includes email
campaigns, automated responses, a daily follow up calendar, and reminder
notices. The product serves as a complete database of prospects and
clients.
ARI MailSmartTM. A direct
mail solution that enables users to cost-effectively and efficiently reach
customers and prospects. An email solution, eMailSmartTM, is also
offered that enables users to stay in touch with customers through special
offers and a quarterly newsletter.
SearchEngineSmartTM. SearchEngineSmartTM, a new product
in fiscal 2009, provides customers the opportunity for paid advertising on all
major search engines so that potential customers will be directed to the
customers' websites.
Professional
Services
ARI
offers a number of value-added professional services to our manufacturer,
distributor and dealer customers. Our manufacturer and distributor
customers wishing to outsource catalog production operations benefit from our
expertise in electronic publishing services, which include project management,
data conversion, editing, production and distribution. The Company
also offers software customization, back-end system integration, and help desk
support services.
Marketing
professional services offered include website creation, hosting and maintenance
services. These services allow our dealer customers to grow their
revenues while increasing efficiency and reducing costs.
Outsourced
F&I Services
Acting as
the dealer's F&I department, ARI F&I SmartTM
obtains financing for customers and provides them with extended service
agreements and other after-sale products. F&I services is a new
service offering for ARI in fiscal 2009 and serves dealers in the power sports,
marine, RV, and independent auto market verticals.
Competition
The
Company and its customers benefit from ARI's focus on its target markets, and
its relationships in and expert knowledge of those markets. ARI’s
primary competitive advantages include:
(i)
|
Our
direct relationships with over 20,000 dealers, 100 manufacturers and 150
distributors;
|
(ii)
|
Our
robust electronic parts catalog suite of products, which allows multi-line
dealers to access catalogs from one single software
platform;
|
(iii)
|
The
e-commerce capabilities of our technology enabled marketing services;
and
|
(iv)
|
Our
relationships with over 75 dealer business management system
providers.
|
We
believe that our competitive advantages will enable us to compete effectively
and sustainably in these markets.
Competition
for ARI’s products and services varies by product and by market. No
single competitor today competes with us on every product and service in each of
our targeted industry verticals.
In
electronic catalog software and services, the largest direct competitor is
Snap-on Business Solutions, which offers electronic service catalogs in the
motorcycle, marine, outdoor power and auto markets. In addition,
there are a variety of small companies focused on specific
industries. General catalog services companies may in the future
directly compete with us in our target markets.
The
technology enabled products and services offered to our dealer customers have
many competitors, including PowerSports Network (owned by Dominion Enterprises),
50 Below and many generalized Internet service providers.
Competition
for our website creation services comes from in-house information technology
groups that may prefer to build their own web-based proprietary systems, rather
than use our common industry solutions. There are also large, general
market e-commerce companies, such as IBM, which offer products and services that
could address some of our customers’ needs. These general e-commerce
companies do not typically compete with us directly, but they could decide to do
so in the future.
Finally,
given the current pace of technological change, it is possible that unidentified
competitors could emerge, existing competitors could merge and/or obtain
additional capital, thereby making them more formidable, or new technologies
could come on-stream that could threaten our position.
Employees
As of
July 31, 2009, we had approximately 148 employees. Of these, 26 are
engaged in maintaining or developing software and providing software
customization services, 47 are in sales and marketing, 50 are involved in
customer operations and support and 25 are involved in general and
administration functions. None of these employees are represented by
a union.
Executive
Officers of the Registrant
The table
below sets forth the names of ARI’s executive officers as of October 16,
2009. The officers serve at the discretion of the Board.
Name
|
|
Age
|
|
Capacity
Served
|
|
|
|
|
|
Roy
W. Olivier
|
|
50
|
|
President,
Chief Executive Officer and Director
|
|
|
|
|
|
Brian
E. Dearing
|
|
54
|
|
Chairman
of the Board, Chief Corporate Development and Strategy Officer, Interim
Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer and Secretary
|
|
|
|
|
|
Michael
T. Tenpas
|
|
41
|
|
Vice
President of Global Sales and Marketing
|
|
|
|
|
|
Robert
J. Hipp
|
|
42
|
|
Chief
Technology Officer
|
Roy W. Olivier. Mr.
Olivier was appointed President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company in
May 2008. Mr. Olivier served as Vice President of Global Sales and
Marketing of the Company from September 2006 to May 2008. Prior to
joining the Company in 2006, Mr. Olivier was a consultant to start-up, small and
medium-sized businesses. Until December 2001, he was Vice President,
Sales & Marketing for ProQuest Media Solutions, a business he founded in
1993 and sold to ProQuest in 2000. Prior to that, Mr. Olivier held various sales
and marketing executive and managerial positions with several other companies in
the telecommunications and computer industries, including Multicom Publishing,
Inc., BusinessLand and PacTel.
Brian E. Dearing. Mr. Dearing
is the Chairman of the Board, Chief Corporate Development and Strategy Officer,
Acting Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer and Corporate Secretary of the
Company. He has been a director of the Company since 1995 and was
elected Chairman of the Board of Directors in 1997. Mr. Dearing
served as the Company’s President and Chief Executive Officer from 1995 until
May 2008. Prior to joining ARI in 1995, Mr. Dearing held
a series of executive positions within the U.S. and Europe in the e-commerce
business of Sterling Software, Inc. Prior to joining Sterling in
1990, Mr. Dearing held a number of marketing management positions in the EDI
business of General Electric Information Services. Mr. Dearing holds
a Masters Degree in Industrial Administration from Krannert School of Management
at Purdue University and a Bachelor of Arts degree in Political Science from
Union College.
Michael T. Tenpas. Mr. Tenpas
joined ARI as Vice President of Global Sales and Marketing in July
2008. For the previous 12 years, Mr. Tenpas worked for Norlight
Telecommunications, Inc. in Brookfield, Wisconsin, starting as a senior account
executive in 1996, and then serving in a number of other sales roles,
culminating in his promotion to Executive Vice President and General Manager of
Norlight Data Centers, Inc. Mr. Tenpas earned a Bachelor of Science degree in
Business Management from the University of Phoenix.
Robert J. Hipp. Mr. Hipp was promoted to
Chief Technology Officer in July 2008. Mr. Hipp joined ARI in
January, 2007 as part of ARI’s acquisition of OC-Net in Cypress, California,
where he had been Chief Executive Officer and President since he founded the
company in 1986. Prior to founding OC-Net, Mr. Hipp held various
technical and managerial positions in the construction industry.
Item 2. Description of Properties
ARI
occupies approximately 16,300 square feet in an office building in Milwaukee,
Wisconsin, under a lease expiring July 16, 2021. This facility houses
our headquarters and one of our data centers.
In
Cypress, California, we occupy approximately 6,000 square feet of office space
under a lease expiring August 31, 2011. This facility houses a significant
portion of our product development and professional services team, as well as
our second data center.
In
Virginia Beach, Virginia, we occupy approximately 9,800 square feet of office
space under a lease expiring April 30, 2010. This facility houses our
Channel Blade operations.
In
Schenectady, New York, we occupy approximately 2,000 square feet of office space
under a lease expiring September 30, 2010. This facility houses our
ARI F&I Services business.
In
Colorado Springs, Colorado, we rent approximately 5,200 square feet of vacant
office under a lease expiring March 31, 2011. We are currently
seeking to sublet this space.
Item 3. Legal Proceedings
[None]
Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security
Holders
[None]
[This
space intentionally left blank.]
PART
II
Item 5. Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related
Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
ARI’s
common stock is currently quoted on the NASDAQ over the counter bulletin board
(“OTCBB”) under the symbol ARIS. The following table sets forth the
high and low sales price for the periods indicated. OTCBB quotations
reflect inter-dealer prices, without retail mark-up, mark-down or commission and
may not necessarily reflect actual transactions.
Fiscal
Quarter Ended
|
|
High
|
|
|
Low
|
|
October
31, 2007
|
|
$ |
1.74 |
|
|
$ |
1.31 |
|
January
31, 2008
|
|
$ |
1.74 |
|
|
$ |
1.34 |
|
April
30, 2008
|
|
$ |
1.95 |
|
|
$ |
1.40 |
|
July
31, 2008
|
|
$ |
1.85 |
|
|
$ |
1.35 |
|
October
31, 2008
|
|
$ |
1.42 |
|
|
$ |
0.60 |
|
January
31, 2009
|
|
$ |
1.18 |
|
|
$ |
0.60 |
|
April
30, 2009
|
|
$ |
1.01 |
|
|
$ |
0.60 |
|
July
31, 2009
|
|
$ |
1.16 |
|
|
$ |
0.62 |
|
As of October 26, 2009, there were approximately 943 holders
of record of the Company’s common stock. The Company has not paid
cash dividends to date and has no current intention to pay cash dividends.
During
the quarter ended July 31, 2009, the Company did not repurchase any of its
equity securities.
In
conjunction with the Company’s purchase of all of the assets related to
electronic parts catalog, e-commerce and certification testing for service
technicians of Info Access, the micropublishing division of Eye Communication
Systems, Inc. (“ECSI”), the Company issued 312,500 shares of its common stock as
a portion of the consideration paid to ECSI on July 1, 2008.
On April
27, 2009, the Company acquired all of the assets of Channel Blade
Technologies. Pursuant to the terms of the Asset Purchase Agreement
dated as of April 27, 2009, the Company issued 615,385 shares of common stock as
a portion of the consideration paid to Channel Blade.
The
Company believes that these transactions were exempt from registration
requirements pursuant to Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933, as
amended. The recipient of the shares of our common stock in each of
these transactions represented its intention to acquire the shares for
investment purposes only and not with a view towards their distribution, and
appropriate legends were affixed to the share certificates.
Item 6. Selected Financial Data
The
following table sets forth certain financial information with respect to the
Company as of and for each of the five fiscal years ended July 31, which
includes information derived from audited Financial Statements and Notes thereto
of ARI Network Services, Inc. for the fiscal years ended July 31, 2009 and
2008. The reports, thereon, of Wipfli LLP are included elsewhere in
this report. The selected financial data should be read in conjunction with
“Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operation” and the aforementioned Financial Statements and Notes.
Statement of Income
Data:
|
|
(In thousands, except per share
data)
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
Net
revenue
|
|
$ |
17,637 |
|
|
$ |
16,917 |
|
|
$ |
15,435 |
|
|
$ |
14,002 |
|
|
$ |
13,661 |
|
Total
cost of products and services sold (1)
|
|
|
3,412 |
|
|
|
2,871 |
|
|
|
2,719 |
|
|
|
2,001 |
|
|
|
1,958 |
|
Gross
profit
|
|
|
14,225 |
|
|
|
14,046 |
|
|
|
12,716 |
|
|
|
12,001 |
|
|
|
11,703 |
|
Gross
margin
|
|
|
80.7 |
% |
|
|
83.0 |
% |
|
|
82.4 |
% |
|
|
85.7 |
% |
|
|
85.7 |
% |
Operating
expenses (2)
|
|
|
13,458 |
|
|
|
13,225 |
|
|
|
12,551 |
|
|
|
9,932 |
|
|
|
9,557 |
|
Operating
income
|
|
|
767 |
|
|
|
821 |
|
|
|
165 |
|
|
|
2,069 |
|
|
|
2,146 |
|
Other
income (expense)
|
|
|
(220 |
) |
|
|
(28 |
) |
|
|
(60 |
) |
|
|
(59 |
) |
|
|
(184 |
) |
Income
before provision for income taxes
|
|
|
547 |
|
|
|
793 |
|
|
|
105 |
|
|
|
2,010 |
|
|
|
1,962 |
|
Income
tax benefit (expense)
|
|
|
(123 |
) |
|
|
590 |
|
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
1,200 |
|
|
|
853 |
|
Net
income
|
|
$ |
424 |
|
|
$ |
1,383 |
|
|
$ |
101 |
|
|
$ |
3,210 |
|
|
$ |
2,815 |
|
Average
common shares outstanding:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
7,203 |
|
|
|
6,678 |
|
|
|
6,378 |
|
|
|
6,130 |
|
|
|
5,992 |
|
Diluted
|
|
|
7,228 |
|
|
|
6,903 |
|
|
|
6,550 |
|
|
|
6,510 |
|
|
|
6,653 |
|
Net
income per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$ |
0.06 |
|
|
$ |
0.21 |
|
|
$ |
0.02 |
|
|
$ |
0.52 |
|
|
$ |
0.47 |
|
Diluted
|
|
$ |
0.06 |
|
|
$ |
0.20 |
|
|
$ |
0.02 |
|
|
$ |
0.49 |
|
|
$ |
0.42 |
|
|
(1)
|
Includes
amortization of software products of $876, $764, $800, $648, and $570 in
2009, 2008, 2007, 2006 and 2005,
respectively.
|
|
(2)
|
Includes
depreciation and amortization, exclusive of amortization of software
products, of $1,101, $727, $631, $382, and $263 in 2009, 2008, 2007, 2006
and 2005, respectively.
|
Selected
Balance Sheet Data:
|
|
(In
thousands)
|
|
|
|
Fiscal
Year Ended July 31
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
Working
capital deficit
|
|
$ |
(6,277 |
) |
|
$ |
(5,475 |
) |
|
$ |
(5,221 |
) |
|
$ |
(3,357 |
) |
|
$ |
(3,911 |
) |
Capitalized
software development (net)
|
|
|
2,397 |
|
|
|
1,596 |
|
|
|
1,606 |
|
|
|
1,468 |
|
|
|
1,486 |
|
Total
assets
|
|
|
18,607 |
|
|
|
12,193 |
|
|
|
9,927 |
|
|
|
9,436 |
|
|
|
7,933 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current
portion of debt and capital lease obligations
|
|
|
726 |
|
|
|
1,471 |
|
|
|
1,031 |
|
|
|
1,400 |
|
|
|
1,204 |
|
Total
long-term debt & capital lease obligations
|
|
|
5,115 |
|
|
|
349 |
|
|
|
484 |
|
|
|
580 |
|
|
|
2,037 |
|
Total
shareholders’ equity (deficit)
|
|
|
4,187 |
|
|
|
2,896 |
|
|
|
718 |
|
|
|
(312 |
) |
|
|
(3,609 |
) |
Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operation
Summary
The
Company produced net income of $424,000 for the fiscal year ended July 31, 2009,
compared to $1,383,000 for the fiscal year ended July 31, 2008. The
decrease in earnings was driven by legal, accounting, and integration costs
related to the Channel Blade and Powersports Outsourcing Group, LLC (“PSOG”)
acquisitions in April 2009 as well as adjustments to the deferred tax
assets. ARI's deferred tax asset valuation is complex and can lead to
large year over year fluctuations. The estimation of ARI's deferred
tax assets and liabilities is discussed in detail in the footnotes to the
Company's Consolidated Financial Statements.
The large
negative swing in year over year net income is net of a substantial reduction in
our operating cost structure. Ongoing cost savings were achieved in
fiscal 2009, which resulted from a combination of the fiscal 2008 restructuring
and office consolidation as well as a concerted effort by the Company to reduce
operating expenses. Management expects to leverage this reduced cost
structure to drive additional profitability as the Company continues to
grow.
Management
believes that the fiscal 2008 restructuring positioned the Company to more
easily integrate its latest acquisitions and that continued tight control over
operating expenses and its recurring revenue from loyal customers has and will
continue to help the Company to maintain operating income during fiscal 2010
despite the difficult economic environment.
Total
revenue increased approximately $720,000, or 4.3%, during fiscal 2009 compared
to fiscal 2008. Revenue related to the Company's acquisitions of
Channel Blade and PSOG approximated $1,215,000 in fiscal 2009. The
increase resulting from the acquired revenue was offset by a decline in
professional services revenues as a result of the effect of the global recession
on ARI’s customers. In order to combat the effects of the global recession,
management implemented a series of initiatives during fiscal 2009 that resulted
in additional revenues of approximately $525,000, much of which is
recurring. Management expects revenues and operating income to
increase in fiscal 2010 as the Company recognizes an entire year of revenue from
the April 2009 acquisitions and pursues various growth and efficiency
initiatives in an economic environment that may be showing early signs of
eventual recovery.
Due to
the nature of our business, the Company typically maintains a working capital
deficit. A large percentage of our subscription based revenues are
paid in advance, resulting in the recognition of a deferred revenue
liability. The Company anticipates sufficient cash flow from
operations to execute our plans.
Critical
Accounting Policies and Estimates
General
The
Company’s discussion and analysis of its financial condition and results of
operations are based upon its financial statements, which have been prepared in
accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the U.S. The
preparation of these financial statements requires the Company to make estimates
and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues
and expenses, and related disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities. On an
on-going basis, the Company evaluates its estimates, including, among others,
those related to customer contracts, valuation of intangible assets, bad debts,
capitalized software product costs, financing instruments, revenue recognition
and other accrued expenses. The Company bases its estimates on historical
experience and on various other assumptions that are believed to be reasonable
under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making
judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not
readily apparent from other sources. Actual results may differ from these
estimates.
The
Company believes the following critical accounting policies affect its more
significant judgments and estimates used in the preparation of its financial
statements.
Revenue
Recognition
Revenue
for use of the network and for information services is recognized on a
straight-line basis over the period of the contract.
Revenue
from annual or periodic maintenance fees is recognized ratably over the period
the maintenance is provided. Revenue from catalog subscriptions is recognized on
a straight-line basis over the subscription term.
Revenue
from software licenses in multiple element arrangements is recognized ratably
over the contractual term of the arrangement. The Company considers all
arrangements with payment terms extending beyond 12 months not to be fixed or
determinable and evaluates other arrangements with payment terms longer than
normal to determine whether the arrangement is fixed or determinable. If the fee
is not fixed or determinable, revenue is recognized as payments become due from
the customer. Arrangements that include acceptance terms beyond the Company’s
standard terms are not recognized until acceptance has occurred. If
collectability is not considered probable, revenue is recognized when the fee is
collected.
Arrangements
that include professional services are evaluated to determine whether those
services are essential to the functionality of other elements of the
arrangement. Types of services that are considered essential include customizing
complex features and functionality in a product’s base software code or
developing complex interfaces within a customer’s environment. When professional
services are not considered essential, the revenue allocable to the professional
services is recognized as the services are performed. When professional services
are considered essential, revenue under the arrangement is recognized pursuant
to contract accounting using the percentage-of-completion method with
progress-to-completion measured based upon labor hours incurred. When the
current estimates of total contract revenue and contract cost indicate a loss, a
provision for the entire loss on the contract is made in the period the amount
is determined.
Amounts
invoiced to customers prior to recognition as revenue as discussed above are
reflected in the accompanying balance sheets as deferred revenue.
The
Company incurred a deferred revenue liability related to setup fees charged for
hosted websites of approximately $1,300,000 from the Channel Blade acquisition,
which are amortized over the terms of the customer contracts, of which
approximately $450,000 was recognized in the fourth quarter of fiscal
2009.
Allowance
for Doubtful Accounts
The
Company maintains an allowance for doubtful accounts for estimated losses
resulting from the inability of its customers to make required payments. The
Company currently reserves for most amounts due over 90 days, unless there is
reasonable assurance of collectability. If the financial condition of the
Company’s customers were to deteriorate, resulting in an impairment of their
ability to make payments, additional allowances may be required. In
fiscal 2009 the Company increased its allowance for doubtful accounts due to
general economic conditions.
Legal Provisions
The
Company is periodically involved in legal proceedings arising from contracts,
patents or other matters in the normal course of business. The Company reserves
for any material estimated loss if the outcome is probable, in accordance with
the provisions of SFAS No. 5, “Accounting for Contingencies.”
Impairment of Long-Lived
Assets
Equipment
and leasehold improvements, capitalized software product costs and other
identifiable assets are reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in
circumstances indicate that the carrying amount may not be recoverable. If the
sum of the expected undiscounted cash flows is less than the carrying value of
the related asset or group of assets, a loss is recognized for the difference
between the fair value and carrying value of the asset or group of
assets.
Cash and Cash
Equivalents
The
Company’s investment policy, as approved by the Board of Directors, is designed
to provide preservation of capital, adequate liquidity to meet projected cash
requirements, optimum yields in relationship to risk, market conditions and tax
considerations and minimum risk of principal loss through diversified short and
medium term investments. Eligible investments include direct
obligations of the U.S. Treasury, obligations issued or guaranteed by the U.S.
government, certain time deposits, certificates of deposits issued by commercial
banks, money market mutual funds, asset backed securities and municipal
bonds. The Company’s current investments include money market mutual
funds with terms not exceeding ninety days.
Deferred Income
Taxes
The tax
effect of the temporary differences between the book and tax bases of assets and
liabilities and the estimated tax benefit from tax net operating losses is
reported as deferred tax assets and liabilities in the balance sheet. An
assessment of the likelihood that net deferred tax assets will be realized from
future taxable income is performed. Because the ultimate realizability of
deferred tax assets is highly subject to the outcome of future events, the
amount established as a valuation allowance is considered to be a significant
estimate that is subject to change in the near term. To the extent a valuation
allowance is established or there is a change in the allowance during a period,
the change is reflected with a corresponding increase or decrease in the tax
provision in the statement of operations.
Stock-Based
Compensation
The
Company uses the Black-Scholes model to value stock options granted. Expected
volatility is based on historical volatility of the Company’s stock. The
expected life of options granted represents the period of time that options
granted are expected to be outstanding. The risk-free rate for periods within
the contractual term of the options is based on the U.S. Treasury yields in
effect at the time of grant. As stock-based compensation expense recognized in
our results of operations is based on awards ultimately expected to vest, the
amount has been reduced for estimated forfeitures. SFAS 123(R),
“Share-Based
Payments,” requires forfeitures to be estimated at the time of grant and
revised, if necessary, in subsequent periods if actual forfeitures differ from
those estimates. Forfeitures were estimated based on our historical
experience.
There
were no capitalized stock-based compensation costs at July 31, 2009 and
2008.
Fair
Value Measurements
Effective
July 1, 2008, the Company adopted SFAS No. 157, “Fair Value
Measurements”. SFAS No. 157 clarifies how companies are required to
use a fair value measure for recognition and disclosure by establishing a common
definition of fair value, creating a framework for measuring fair value, and
expanding disclosures about fair value measurements. SFAS No. 157
establishes a three-tier fair value hierarchy, which prioritizes the inputs used
in measuring fair value. These tiers include: Level 1, defined as
observable inputs such as quoted market prices in active markets; Level 2,
defined as inputs other than quoted market prices in active markets that are
either directly or indirectly observable; and Level 3, defined as unobservable
inputs in which little or no market data exists, therefore, requiring an entity
to develop its own assumptions. The adoption of SFAS No. 157 did not
have a material impact on the Company’s result of operations or financial
position.
The
Company measures many financial instruments and certain other items at fair
value. Unrealized gains and losses on items for which the fair value option has
been elected are recognized in earnings.
Goodwill
and Other Intangible Assets
Under
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 142, “Goodwill and Other
Intangible Assets,” goodwill and intangible assets deemed to have indefinite
lives are not amortized, but are subject to annual impairment tests. Intangible
assets with definitive lives at July 31, 2009 and 2008 consist primarily of
customer relationships and trade names, which are amortized over their estimated
useful lives of 4-8 years, and employee non-compete agreements, which are
amortized over their estimated useful lives of two years. These
assets were acquired in the ECSI acquisition on July 1, 2008, the OC-Net,
Incorporated, (“OC-Net”) acquisition on January 26, 2007 and the Channel Blade
Technologies (“Channel Blade”) acquisition on April 27, 2009, where the fair
values were determined using the discounted cash flow approach.
The
Company performs impairment tests annually or more frequently if facts and
circumstances warrant a review. The Company determined that there was a single
reporting unit for the purpose of goodwill impairment tests under SFAS
142. For purposes of assessing the impairment of goodwill, the
Company estimates the value of the reporting unit using the best evidence
available, which in fiscal 2009 and 2008 was a discounted cash flow model,
consideration of recent transaction values and market capitalization. This fair
value is then compared with the carrying value of the reporting
unit. During fiscal 2009 and 2008 there were no impairments to
goodwill.
Revenues
Management
reviews the Company’s revenue in the aggregate, by geography and by product
category within a region. The
following tables set forth, for the periods indicated, certain revenue
information derived from the Company’s financial statements:
Revenue
by Location and Service
|
|
(In
Thousands)
|
|
|
|
For
the Fiscal Year Ended July 31
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Percent
Change
|
|
North
America
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Catalog
subscriptions
|
|
$ |
10,410 |
|
|
$ |
9,953 |
|
|
|
4.6 |
|
Catalog
professional services
|
|
|
872 |
|
|
|
1,268 |
|
|
|
(31.2 |
) |
Marketing
services
|
|
|
3,921 |
|
|
|
2,351 |
|
|
|
66.8 |
|
Marketing
professional services
|
|
|
882 |
|
|
|
1,594 |
|
|
|
(44.7 |
) |
Other
revenues
|
|
|
719 |
|
|
|
660 |
|
|
|
8.9 |
|
Subtotal
North America
|
|
|
16,804 |
|
|
|
15,826 |
|
|
|
6.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rest
of the World
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Catalog
subscriptions
|
|
|
817 |
|
|
|
1,078 |
|
|
|
(24.2 |
) |
Catalog
professional services
|
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
23.1 |
|
Subtotal
Rest of the World
|
|
|
833 |
|
|
|
1,091 |
|
|
|
(23.6 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
Revenue
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Catalog
subscriptions
|
|
|
11,227 |
|
|
|
11,031 |
|
|
|
1.8 |
|
Catalog
professional services
|
|
|
888 |
|
|
|
1,281 |
|
|
|
(30.7 |
) |
Marketing
services
|
|
|
3,921 |
|
|
|
2,351 |
|
|
|
66.8 |
|
Marketing
professional services
|
|
|
882 |
|
|
|
1,594 |
|
|
|
(44.7 |
) |
Other
revenues
|
|
|
719 |
|
|
|
660 |
|
|
|
8.9 |
|
Total
Revenue
|
|
$ |
17,637 |
|
|
$ |
16,917 |
|
|
|
4.3 |
|
North
America
Catalog
Subscriptions
North
American catalog subscription revenues are derived from software license fees,
license renewal fees, software maintenance and support fees, catalog
subscription fees, and other miscellaneous subscription fees charged to dealers,
distributors and manufacturers for the use of the Company’s catalog products in
the U.S. and Canada. Catalog subscription revenues increased 4.6% in fiscal
2009, compared to the same period last year, due to the addition of revenues
resulting from the acquisition of the micropublishing division of
ECSI.
The
Company continues to experience a decline in manufacturer catalog subscription
revenue but increasing dealer-based catalog subscription
revenue. This is due to a decline related to the non-renewal of a
significant OEM customer that subscribed to the Company’s’ electronic parts
catalog in bulk on behalf of its dealers; this decline was partially offset by:
(i) revenue from this OEM’s dealers, which in turn purchased the electronic
catalogs directly from the Company; (ii) sales to customers related to the ECSI
acquisition; and (iii) a modest price increase. Catalog subscription
renewals from the Company’s North American dealers were greater than 89% for
fiscal 2009. Management expects revenues from catalog subscriptions in North
America to remain relatively the same in fiscal 2010.
Catalog Professional
Services
Revenues
from North American catalog professional services are derived from software
customization labor, data conversion labor, data conversion replication fees,
travel and shipping fees primarily charged to manufacturers and distributors in
the U.S. and Canada. Revenues from catalog professional services in North
America decreased in fiscal 2009, compared to the same period last year,
primarily due to fewer new customization projects sold to manufacturers as a
result of the weakened economy. Management expects revenues from catalog
professional services in North America may begin to rebound in fiscal 2010,
commensurate with anticipated improvements in economic conditions.
Marketing
Services
Revenues
from the Company’s North American marketing service subscriptions are derived
from start-up, hosting and access fees charged to dealers for the Company’s
website products, commissions from on-line sales through the use of these
products, as well as set-up, postage and subscription fees for the Company’s
lead management and advertising products sold in the U.S. and Canada. Revenues
from marketing services in North America increased significantly in fiscal
2009. This increase was driven by the additional revenues resulting
from the Company's acquisition of Channel Blade in April 2009, including the
recognition of approximately $450,000 for the amortization of deferred hosted
website setup fees.
Additional
revenues were also achieved through the implementation of various revenue
initiatives in fiscal 2009, including the Company's new SearchEngineSmart™
product, which generated revenues of approximately $180,000 during the
year. Management expects significant growth in revenues from
marketing services in North America in fiscal 2010 as the result of a full year
of revenues from Channel Blade and the SearchEngineSmart™ product, as well as
new sales of existing products as the Company continues to focus its resources
in this area of the business.
Marketing Professional
Services
Revenues
from the Company’s North American marketing professional services are derived
from website customization labor primarily charged to manufacturers,
distributors and other customers in the U.S. The decline in revenues from
marketing professional services in fiscal 2009 is due to reduced spending by two
customers for web customization services as a result of market
conditions. Management expects revenues from marketing professional
services may increase slightly in fiscal 2010 if the economy begins to
recover.
Other Revenues
Other
revenues are derived from license renewal fees, software maintenance,
customization labor and other communication fees charged for dealers and
distributors to communicate with manufacturers in the manufactured equipment
industry and the agricultural inputs industry. Revenues from ARI's F&I
services are also included within this category. Other revenues
increased in fiscal 2009, compared to the same period last year, resulting from
the Company's acquisition of PSOG in April 2009. Management expects
revenues from outsourced F&I services to increase as a full year's worth of
revenues is realized.
Rest
of the World
Catalog
Subscriptions
ARI’s
non-North American revenues consist primarily of catalog subscriptions, which
are derived from software license fees, license renewal fees, software
maintenance and support fees, catalog subscription fees, and other miscellaneous
subscription fees charged to dealers, distributors and manufacturers outside of
North America for the use of the Company’s catalog products. Catalog
subscription revenues for the rest of the world decreased in fiscal 2009,
compared to fiscal 2008, due to reduced revenue from an existing OEM
contract. Additionally, as the Company continues to face challenges
in the European market, revenues from new sales were not sufficient to offset
lost dealer renewals. Management expects catalog subscription
revenues from the rest of the world to continue to decline slightly in fiscal
2010.
Catalog Professional
Services
Revenues
from Rest of World catalog professional services are derived from software
customization labor, data conversion labor, data conversion replication fees,
language translation fees, travel and shipping fees primarily charged to
manufacturers and distributors outside of North America. The
Company has a small amount of revenue earned for data conversion, translation
and replication fees charged to a manufacturer for periodic international
catalog updates.
[This
space intentionally left blank.]
Cost
of Revenue
The
following table sets forth, for the periods indicated, certain information
concerning the Company’s revenue and cost of revenue, derived from the Company’s
financial statements.
Cost
of Revenue
|
|
(In
thousands)
|
|
|
|
For
the Fiscal Year Ended July 31
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Percent
Change
|
|
Catalog
subscriptions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue
|
|
$ |
11,227 |
|
|
$ |
11,031 |
|
|
|
1.8 |
|
Cost
of revenue
|
|
|
1,825 |
|
|
|
1,226 |
|
|
|
48.9 |
|
Gross
profit
|
|
|
9,402 |
|
|
|
9,805 |
|
|
|
(4.1 |
) |
Gross
margin percentage
|
|
|
83.7 |
% |
|
|
88.9 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Catalog
professional services
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue
|
|
|
888 |
|
|
|
1,281 |
|
|
|
(30.7 |
) |
Cost
of revenue
|
|
|
402 |
|
|
|
503 |
|
|
|
(20.1 |
) |
Gross
profit
|
|
|
486 |
|
|
|
778 |
|
|
|
(37.5 |
) |
Gross
margin percentage
|
|
|
54.7 |
% |
|
|
60.7 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Marketing
services
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue
|
|
|
3,921 |
|
|
|
2,351 |
|
|
|
66.8 |
|
Cost
of revenue
|
|
|
706 |
|
|
|
585 |
|
|
|
20.7 |
|
Gross
profit
|
|
|
3,215 |
|
|
|
1,766 |
|
|
|
82.0 |
|
Gross
margin percentage
|
|
|
82.0 |
% |
|
|
75.1 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Marketing
professional services
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue
|
|
|
882 |
|
|
|
1,594 |
|
|
|
(44.7 |
) |
Cost
of revenue
|
|
|
449 |
|
|
|
542 |
|
|
|
(17.2 |
) |
Gross
profit
|
|
|
433 |
|
|
|
1,052 |
|
|
|
(58.8 |
) |
Gross
margin percentage
|
|
|
49.1 |
% |
|
|
66.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue
|
|
|
719 |
|
|
|
660 |
|
|
|
8.9 |
|
Cost
of revenue
|
|
|
30 |
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
Gross
profit
|
|
|
689 |
|
|
|
645 |
|
|
|
6.8 |
|
Gross
margin percentage
|
|
|
95.8 |
% |
|
|
97.7 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue
|
|
|
17,637 |
|
|
|
16,917 |
|
|
|
4.3 |
|
Cost
of revenue
|
|
|
3,412 |
|
|
|
2,871 |
|
|
|
18.8 |
|
Gross
profit
|
|
$ |
14,225 |
|
|
$ |
14,046 |
|
|
|
1.3 |
|
Gross
margin percentage
|
|
|
80.7 |
% |
|
|
83.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
Cost
of Catalog Subscriptions
Cost of
catalog subscriptions consists primarily of reseller fees, software amortization
costs, catalog data conversion, replication and distribution costs. Cost of
catalog subscriptions as a percentage of revenue increased in fiscal 2009,
compared to fiscal 2008, primarily due to non-billable catalog replication and
distribution costs related to the production of new catalog offerings.
Management expects gross margins, as a percentage of revenue from catalog
subscriptions, to vary slightly from year to year due to the timing of data
shipments and variations in the recognition of revenue which does not directly
correlate to software amortization expense, which is generally on a
straight-line basis.
Cost
of Catalog Professional Services
Cost of
catalog professional services consists of customization and catalog production
labor. Cost of professional services as a percentage of revenue increased in
fiscal 2009, compared to fiscal 2008, due to non-billable work performed for
manufacturers on various projects. Management expects cost of catalog
professional services, as a percentage of revenue from catalog professional
services, to fluctuate from year to year depending on the mix of services sold
and the portion of customizations that are billable, and on the Company’s
performance towards the contracted amount for customization
projects.
Cost
of Marketing Service Subscriptions
Cost of
revenue for marketing service subscriptions consists primarily of advertising
royalty fees, website setup labor, software amortization costs, postcards, and
printing and distribution costs. Cost of marketing services as a percentage of
revenue decreased for fiscal 2009, compared to fiscal 2008, primarily due to
recognition of deferred setup fee revenues from the Channel Blade acquisition,
which have very little associated cost. Management expects gross margins, as a
percentage of revenue from marketing services, to fluctuate from year to year
depending on the mix of products and services sold.
Cost
of Marketing Professional Services
Cost of
revenues for marketing professional services consists of website customization
labor. Cost of revenues for marketing professional services as a percentage of
revenue increased in fiscal 2009, compared to fiscal 2008, primarily due to
non-billable work performed on customized websites. Management
expects cost of marketing professional services to fluctuate from year to year
depending on the Company’s performance towards the contracted amount for
customization projects and the actual labor rates negotiated in customer
contracts.
Cost
of Other Revenues
Cost of
other revenues consists primarily of telecommunication costs, royalties and
software customization labor. Cost of other revenues as a percentage of revenue
remained relatively the same during fiscal 2009, compared to fiscal
2008. Cost of other revenues includes cost of sales related to the
Company’s F&I revenue. Management expects gross margins on other
services revenue, as a percent of other revenue, to decrease for the remainder
of fiscal 2009, compared to the same period in the previous year, as more of
this revenue comes from the new F&I business.
Operating
Expenses
Beginning
in fiscal 2009, the Company reclassified the components of operating expenses to
conform to the operational changes instituted as a result of its acquisitions
and 2008 restructuring. The fiscal 2008 financial statements have
been reclassified to conform to the fiscal 2009 presentation. The
following table sets forth, for the periods indicated, certain operating expense
information derived from the Company’s financial statements:
Operating
Expenses
|
|
(In
thousands)
|
|
|
|
For
the Fiscal Year Ended July 31
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Percent
of Revenue
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Percent
of Revenue
|
|
|
Percent
Change
|
|
Sales
and marketing
|
|
$ |
4,072 |
|
|
|
23.1 |
|
|
$ |
3,448 |
|
|
|
20.4 |
|
|
|
18.1 |
|
Customer
operations and support
|
|
|
2,785 |
|
|
|
15.8 |
|
|
|
2,728 |
|
|
|
16.1 |
|
|
|
2.1 |
|
Software
development and technical support (1)
|
|
|
1,288 |
|
|
|
7.3 |
|
|
|
1,656 |
|
|
|
9.8 |
|
|
|
(22.2 |
) |
General
and administrative
|
|
|
4,212 |
|
|
|
23.9 |
|
|
|
4,137 |
|
|
|
24.5 |
|
|
|
1.8 |
|
Restructuring
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
|
|
529 |
|
|
|
3.1 |
|
|
|
(100.0 |
) |
Depreciation
and amortization (2)
|
|
|
1,101 |
|
|
|
6.2 |
|
|
|
727 |
|
|
|
4.3 |
|
|
|
51.4 |
|
Net
operating expenses
|
|
$ |
13,458 |
|
|
|
76.3 |
|
|
$ |
13,225 |
|
|
|
78.2 |
|
|
|
1.8 |
|
|
(1)
|
Net
of capitalized software product costs of $815 and $524 in 2009 and 2008,
respectively.
|
|
(2)
|
Exclusive
of $876 and $764 in 2009 and 2008, respectively, of amortization of
software products included in cost of
revenue.
|
Summary
Net
operating expenses increased in fiscal 2009, compared to the prior year, due to
costs associated with the Channel Blade and PSOG operations acquired in April
2009, but decreased as a percentage of revenue, which was a result of the
Company's fiscal 2008 restructuring as well as concerted efforts by the Company
to reduce its operating expense structure.
Management
expects net operating expenses to continue to be higher in fiscal 2010, compared
to the previous year, due to (i) the overall growth of the Company; (ii) a full
year of amortization expense related to the Channel Blade acquisition; and (iii)
expected losses in ARI F&I Smart as the Company invests in the long-term
viability of the F&I business. However, management expects
operating expenses to continue to decrease, as a percentage of revenues, in
fiscal 2011 and beyond as the business continues to grow and the Company
leverages its reduced operating expense structure.
Sales
and Marketing Expenses
Sales and
marketing expenses increased in fiscal 2009, compared to fiscal 2008, due to
sales labor associated with the Channel Blade and PSOG
acquisitions. Management expects sales and marketing costs to be
higher for fiscal 2010, compared to fiscal 2009, due to the inclusion of the
payroll expense from the acquisitions for the entire year, but to gradually
decline as a percentage of revenue, as the acquisitions become fully
integrated.
Customer
Operations and Support
Customer
operations and support consists primarily of server room operations, software
maintenance agreements for the Company’s core network and customer support
costs. Customer operations and support costs increased slightly due to
additional costs from the Channel Blade and PSOG acquisitions, but decreased as
a percentage of revenue. Management expects customer operations and support
costs to increase in fiscal 2010, compared to fiscal 2009, due to the additional
costs related to the acquisitions.
Software
Development and Technical Support
The
Company’s software development staff (both in-house and contracted) performs
software development, escalated technical support, software customization and
data conversion services for customer applications. Management expects
fluctuations from year to year, as the mix of development and customization
activities will change based on customer requirements even if the total
technical staff costs remain relatively constant. Software development and
technical support costs decreased in fiscal 2009, compared to fiscal 2008,
primarily due to an increase in time spent on capitalized web-based products and
cost savings resulting from the 2008 restructuring. Management
expects software development and technical support costs to increase in fiscal
2010, compared to fiscal 2009, due to the additional costs related to the
acquisitions.
General
and Administrative
General
and administrative expenses (“G&A”) increased in fiscal 2009, compared to
fiscal 2008, but decreased as a percentage of revenue. The dollar
increase resulted from the addition of the Channel Blade and PSOG businesses in
April 2009.
The
decrease in G&A costs, as a percentage of revenues, resulted from a
combination of two factors. First, facility and labor cost savings
were achieved from ARI's fiscal 2008 restructuring and office
consolidation. The Company incurred a restructuring charge in the
fourth quarter of fiscal 2008 to reflect severance costs and redundant occupancy
costs related to the consolidation of the Company’s data conversion operations
in Virginia into its Wisconsin location and the consolidation of the software
development operations in Colorado into its California
location. Second, the Company made concerted efforts to reduce its
operating cost structure.
Management
expects G&A expenses to increase in fiscal 2010, compared to the previous
year, due to (i) the overall growth of the Company; (ii) a full year of
amortization expense related to the Channel Blade acquisition; and (iii)
expected losses in ARI F&I Smart as the Company invests in the long-term
viability of the F&I business. However, management expects
G&A expenses to continue to decrease, as a percentage of revenues, in fiscal
2011 and beyond as the business continues to grow and the Company leverages its
reduced expense structure.
Depreciation
and amortization expense increased in fiscal 2009, compared to fiscal 2008,
primarily due to the depreciation of new software and equipment and the
amortization of intangible assets associated with the Channel Blade acquisition.
Management expects depreciation and amortization to continue to be higher in
fiscal 2010 due to a full year of amortization of intangible assets related to
the Channel Blade acquisition.
Other
Items
Interest
expense includes both cash and non-cash interest. Interest paid increased
$102,000 in fiscal 2009, compared to fiscal 2008, due to the addition of debt
related to the acquisition of Channel Blade. Management expects
interest expense to increase in fiscal 2010, compared to fiscal 2009, due to the
recognition of a full years' interest on the Channel Blade debt. See
“Liquidity and Capital Resources”.
Liquidity
and Capital Resources
The
following table sets forth, for the periods indicated, certain cash flow
information derived from the Company’s financial statements:
Cash
Flow Information
|
|
(In
thousands)
|
|
|
|
For
the Fiscal Year Ended July 31
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Percent
Change
|
|
Net
income
|
|
$ |
424 |
|
|
$ |
1,383 |
|
|
|
(69.3 |
) |
Adjustments
to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating
activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization
of software products
|
|
|
876 |
|
|
|
764 |
|
|
|
14.7 |
|
Amortization
of debt discount and other
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
25 |
|
|
|
(68.0 |
) |
Depreciation
and other amortization
|
|
|
1,101 |
|
|
|
727 |
|
|
|
51.4 |
|
Allowance
for investment in Bank Note
|
|
|
127 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
n/a |
|
Stock
based compensation
|
|
|
315 |
|
|
|
306 |
|
|
|
2.9 |
|
Deferred
income taxes
|
|
|
88 |
|
|
|
(648 |
) |
|
|
113.6 |
|
Stock
issued to 401(k) plan
|
|
|
45 |
|
|
|
38 |
|
|
|
18.4 |
|
Net
change in working capital
|
|
|
(239 |
) |
|
|
(568 |
) |
|
|
57.9 |
|
Net
cash provided by operating activities
|
|
|
2,745 |
|
|
|
2,027 |
|
|
|
35.4 |
|
Net
cash used in investing activities
|
|
|
(2,219 |
) |
|
|
(1,651 |
) |
|
|
(34.4 |
) |
Net
cash used in financing activities
|
|
|
(968 |
) |
|
|
(353 |
) |
|
|
(174.2 |
) |
Effect
of foreign currency exchange rate changes on cash
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
(53.8 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
change in cash
|
|
$ |
(436 |
) |
|
$ |
36 |
|
|
|
(1311.1 |
) |
At July
31, 2009, the Company had cash and cash equivalents of $650,000 compared to
$1,086,000 at July 31, 2008. Cash generated from operations exceeded
$2,700,000 for fiscal 2009. This cash was used to fund two
acquisitions, for investment in equipment and software development, and for the
repayment of debt and capital lease obligations.
Net cash
provided by operating activities increased in fiscal 2009, compared to fiscal
2008, due to the Company's increased revenues and its reduced operating expense
structure. This increase came despite the additional costs related to
the April 2009 Channel Blade and PSOG acquisitions.
Management
expects cash provided by operating activities to remain relatively flat in
fiscal 2010 as the Company fully integrates the Channel Blade business and
additional investments are made into the F&I business.
Net cash
used in investing activities increased in fiscal 2009, compared to the prior
year, due to the purchase of Channel Blade and PSOG. Management expects cash
used in investing activities to fluctuate from year to year, depending on the
level of software development and the timing of acquisitions.
Net cash
used in financing activities increased in fiscal 2009, compared to the prior
year, as the Company used a portion of its cash from operations to pay down its
line of credit, whereas in fiscal 2008 the Company had net borrowings against
the line of credit.
Management
expects cash used in financing activities to decrease in fiscal 2010, compared
to the prior year, as principal obligations on the Channel Blade debt do not
become due until July 2011. The Company does not anticipate the need for
additional funding unless it makes another acquisition.
The
following table sets forth, for the periods indicated, certain information
related to the Company’s debt derived from the Company’s audited financial
statements.
Debt
Schedule
|
|
(In
thousands)
|
|
|
|
As
of July 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Change
|
|
Debt
related to Channel Blade acquisition:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current
portion of notes payable
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
Long
term portion of notes payable
|
|
|
5,000 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
5,000 |
|
Total
notes payable related Channel Blade acquisition
|
|
|
5,000 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
5,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Debt
related to OC-Net acquisition:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current
portion of notes payable
|
|
|
117 |
|
|
|
233 |
|
|
|
(116 |
) |
Long
term portion of notes payable
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
117 |
|
|
|
(117 |
) |
Total
notes payable
|
|
|
117 |
|
|
|
350 |
|
|
|
(233 |
) |
Current
cash earnout
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
150 |
|
|
|
(150 |
) |
Imputed
interest on cash earnout/holdback
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(8 |
) |
|
|
8 |
|
Total
debt related to OC-Net acquisition
|
|
|
117 |
|
|
|
492 |
|
|
|
(375 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Debt
related to ECSI acquisition:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current
portion of notes payable
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
300 |
|
|
|
(300 |
) |
Long
term portion of notes payable
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
Total
notes payable related to ECSI acquisition
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
300 |
|
|
|
(300 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current
borrowings on line of credit
|
|
|
500 |
|
|
|
700 |
|
|
|
(200 |
) |
Total
Debt
|
|
$ |
5,617 |
|
|
$ |
1,492 |
|
|
$ |
276 |
|
The
Company issued a $5,000,000 secured promissory note (“the Note”) in connection
with the April 27, 2009 purchase of Channel Blade. The Note is
subordinated and junior in right of payment to all indebtedness, obligations and
liabilities of the Company, existing as of April 27, 2009 or thereafter
incurred, to current or future Senior Lenders (as defined in the Note) of the
Company. The Company’s obligations under the Note are secured by a
Subordinated Security Agreement dated as of April 27, 2009, pursuant to which
the Company granted to Channel Blade a continuing junior security interest in
substantially all of the assets of the Company. The payments are
subject to acceleration upon certain events of default.
The
annual interest rate on the note is 10% for the first year and 14% thereafter,
unless the conditions of the covenant described below are
met. Accrued interest only is due quarterly commencing July 31, 2009
through April 30, 2011. Twenty equal quarterly payments of principal
plus accrued interest shall then be due, commencing July 31,
2011. The note contains a covenant that if the Company pre-pays a
minimum principal amount of $3,000,000 on or before April 27, 2010, the interest
rate will remain 10% for the remainder of the Note’s term. The
Company does not expect to make this early principal payment by April 27,
2010.
The
Company issued $700,000 of notes and $400,000 of future, non-interest bearing
contingent payments in connection with the OC-Net acquisition in 2007. The
interest rate on the notes is prime plus 2%, adjusted quarterly (effective rate
of 5.25% as of July 31, 2009). The notes are payable in quarterly principal
installments of $58,300, commencing March 31, 2007 through December 31, 2009.
The notes do not contain any financial covenants. The Company paid $250,000 of
the contingent payments in February, 2008, and the remaining $150,000, which
included $8,000 of imputed interest, was paid in January, 2009.
In 2008,
the Company issued $300,000 of notes payable in connection with the ECSI
acquisition, of which $100,000 was paid on October 1, 2008 and $200,000 was paid
on July 1, 2009.
On July
9, 2004, the Company entered into a line of credit agreement with JPMorgan
Chase, N.A. which, as amended, permits the Company to borrow an amount equal to
80% of the book value of all eligible accounts receivable plus 45% of the value
of all eligible open renewal orders (provided the renewal rate is at least 85%)
minus $75,000, up to $1,500,000. Eligible accounts include certain
non-foreign accounts receivable which are outstanding for fewer than 90 days
from the invoice date.
The note
bears interest at 1% per annum above the prime rate (effective rate of 4.25% as
of July 31, 2009) plus an additional 3%, at the lender’s option, upon the
occurrence of any default under the note, plus a non-usage fee of 0.25% per
annum on any unused portion of the line of credit. The line of credit
terminates June 30, 2011 and is secured by substantially all of the Company’s
assets. The line of credit limits repurchases of common stock, the
payment of dividends, liens on assets and new indebtedness. It also
contains a financial covenant requiring the Company to maintain a minimum debt
service coverage ratio of 1.2 to 1.0, with which the Company was in compliance
at July 31, 2009. The Company had $500,000 and $700,000 principal
outstanding on the line of credit at July 31, 2009, and July 31, 2008,
respectively.
Management
believes that funds generated from operations will be adequate to fund the
Company’s operations, investments and debt payments for the foreseeable future,
although additional financing may be necessary if the Company were to complete a
material acquisition or to make a large investment in its business.
Acquisitions
Since
December 1995 the Company has had a formal corporate development program aimed
at identifying, evaluating and closing acquisitions that augment and strengthen
the Company’s market position, product offerings, and personnel resources. Since
the program’s inception, nine business acquisitions and one software asset
acquisition have been completed, six of which were fully integrated into the
Company’s operations prior to fiscal year 2009.
On April
27, 2009, the Company acquired substantially all of the assets of Channel Blade,
the leading provider of websites, lead management and marketing automation
solutions in the marine and RV markets. Consideration for the acquisition
included approximately $500,000 in cash, 615,385 shares of the Company’s common
stock at a market price of $0.75 per share, $765,000 of assumed liabilities and
a $5,000,000 note payable.
The
Company included the results of operations of Channel Blade for the four days
ending April 30, 2009 and the quarter ended July 31, 2009, in its consolidated
financial statements for the fiscal year ended July 31, 2009.
In
connection with the acquisition, the Company entered into one year employment
agreements with Jon M. Lintvet and Charles Lewis (the “Employment Agreements”)
to serve as Director of New Business Development and Director of Strategic
Accounts- Marine and RV, respectively.
On April
17, 2009, ARI F&I Services, LLC, a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company,
acquired the assets of PSOG, valued at approximately $85,000, in partial
satisfaction of its debt to ARI of approximately $185,000, $149,000 of which the
Company purchased from Keybank National Association on April 16,
2009. PSOG, located in Schenectady, NY and led by Mark L. Taylor, had
been offering outsourced F&I services to power sports, marine and RV
customers in the Northeast U.S. since 1998. In connection with the
acquisition, AFIS entered into a three year employment agreement with Mark L.
Taylor to serve as Director of F&I Business Development. The Company
included the results of operations of AFIS for the fourteen days ending April
30, 2009 and the quarter ended July 31, 2009 in its consolidated financial
statements for the fiscal year ended July 31, 2009.
On July
1, 2008, the Company acquired all of the assets related to electronic parts
catalogs, electronic commerce and certification testing for service technicians
of Info Access, the micropublishing division of Eye Communication Systems, Inc.,
located in Hartland, WI. Consideration for the acquisition included
approximately $1,000,000 in cash, 312,500 shares of the Company’s common stock,
and notes payable of $300,000. The notes payable were paid in full
during fiscal 2009.
The
corporate development program is an important component of the Company’s
long-term growth strategy and the Company expects to continue to pursue it
aggressively.
Forward
Looking Statements
Certain
statements contained in this Form 10-K are forward looking statements including
statements related to revenue growth, future cash flows and cash generation and
sources of liquidity. Expressions such as “believes,” “anticipates,” “expects,”
and similar expressions are intended to identify such forward looking
statements. Several important factors can cause actual results to materially
differ from those stated or implied in the forward looking statements. Such
factors include, but are not limited to the factors listed on exhibit 99.1 of
this annual report on Form 10-K, which is incorporated herein by
reference.
Quarterly
Financial Data
The
following table sets forth the unaudited operations data for each of the eight
quarterly periods ended July 31, 2009, prepared on a basis consistent with the
audited financial statements, reflecting all normal recurring adjustments that
are considered necessary. The quarterly information is as follows (in thousands,
except per share data):
Quarterly
Financial Data
|
|
(Unaudited - In thousands,
except per share data)
|
|
|
|
1st
Quarter
|
|
|
2nd
Quarter
|
|
|
3rd
Quarter
|
|
|
4th
Quarter
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
Net
revenues
|
|
$ |
4,169 |
|
|
$ |
4,224 |
|
|
$ |
3,955 |
|
|
$ |
4,222 |
|
|
$ |
4,166 |
|
|
$ |
4,158 |
|
|
$ |
5,347 |
|
|
$ |
4,313 |
|
Gross
margin
|
|
|
3,440 |
|
|
|
3,477 |
|
|
|
3,223 |
|
|
|
3,442 |
|
|
|
3,398 |
|
|
|
3,484 |
|
|
|
4,164 |
|
|
|
3,643 |
|
Net
income (loss)
|
|
|
256 |
|
|
|
243 |
|
|
|
56 |
|
|
|
335 |
|
|
|
226 |
|
|
|
427 |
|
|
|
(114 |
) |
|
|
378 |
|
Basic
EPS
|
|
$ |
0.04 |
|
|
$ |
0.04 |
|
|
$ |
0.01 |
|
|
$ |
0.05 |
|
|
$ |
0.03 |
|
|
$ |
0.06 |
|
|
$ |
(0.02 |
) |
|
$ |
0.06 |
|
Diluted
EPS
|
|
$ |
0.04 |
|
|
$ |
0.04 |
|
|
$ |
0.01 |
|
|
$ |
0.05 |
|
|
$ |
0.03 |
|
|
$ |
0.06 |
|
|
$ |
(0.02 |
) |
|
$ |
0.05 |
|
Off-Balance
Sheet Arrangements
ARI has
no significant off-balance sheet arrangements that have or are reasonably likely
to have a material current or future effect on its financial condition, revenues
or expenses, results of operations, liquidity, capital expenditures or capital
resources.
Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data
Reference
is made to the Consolidated Financial Statements, the reports thereon and the
notes thereto commencing after the signature page of this Report, which are
incorporated herein by reference.
Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on
Accounting and Financial Disclosure
[None]
Item 9A(T). Controls and Procedures
Evaluation
of Disclosure Controls and Procedures.
We
maintain disclosure controls and procedures designed to ensure that information
required to be disclosed in our reports filed under the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), is recorded, processed, summarized,
and reported within the required time periods and that such information is
accumulated and communicated to our management, including our Chief Executive
Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate, to allow for timely
decisions regarding required disclosure.
As
required by Rule 13a-15 under the Exchange Act, we have completed an evaluation,
under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including
the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer, of the
effectiveness and the design and operation of our disclosure controls and
procedures as of July 31, 2009. Based upon this evaluation, our management,
including the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer, has
concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of July
31, 2009.
Management’s
Annual Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting
Our
management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal
control over financial reporting as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)
under the Securities Exchange Act. Under the supervision and with the
participation of our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and the
Chief Financial Officer, we conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of our
internal control over financial reporting based on the framework in Internal
Control over Financial Reporting – Guidance for Smaller Public Companies issued
by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. Based
on our evaluation under this framework, our management concluded that our
internal control over financial reporting was effective as of July 31,
2009.
This
report does not include an attestation report of the Company’s registered public
accounting firm regarding internal control over financial reporting.
Management’s report was not subject to attestation by the Company’s registered
public accounting firm pursuant to temporary rules of the Securities and
Exchange Commission that permit the Company to provide only management’s report
in this annual report.
Changes
in Internal Controls
There
were no changes to the Company’s internal control over financial reporting
during the quarter ended July 31, 2009 that have materially affected, or are
reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over
financial reporting.
Limitations
on Effectiveness of Controls and Procedures
Our
management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer,
does not expect that our disclosure controls and procedures or our internal
controls will prevent all errors and all fraud. A control system, no matter how
well conceived and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute,
assurance that the objectives of the control system are met. Further, the design
of a control system must reflect the fact that there are resource constraints
and the benefits of controls must be considered relative to their costs. Because
of the inherent limitations in all control systems, no evaluation of controls
can provide absolute assurance that all control issues and instances of fraud,
if any, within the Company have been detected. These inherent limitations
include, but are not limited to, the realities that judgments in decision-making
can be faulty and that breakdowns can occur because of simple error or mistake.
Additionally, controls can be circumvented by the individual acts of some
persons, by collusion of two or more people, or by management override of the
control. The design of any system of controls also is based in part upon certain
assumptions about the likelihood of future events and there can be no assurance
that any design will succeed in achieving its stated goals under all potential
future conditions. Over time, controls may become inadequate because of changes
in conditions, or the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may
deteriorate. Because of the inherent limitations in a cost-effective control
system, misstatements due to error or fraud may occur and not be
detected.
PART
III
Item 10. Directors, Executive Officers, Promoters and
Control Persons; Compliance with Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act
Information
regarding the directors of ARI, the Company’s Code of Ethics and compliance with
Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act is included in ARI’s definitive 2009 Annual
Meeting Proxy Statement, and is incorporated herein by reference. See
“Election of Directors,” “Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting
Compliance” and “Code of Ethics.” Information with respect to ARI’s
executive officers is shown at the end of Part I of this Form 10-K.
Item 11. Executive Compensation
Information
regarding Executive Compensation, Employment Agreements, Compensation of
Directors, Employee Stock Options and other compensation plans is included in
ARI’s definitive 2009 Annual Meeting Proxy Statement, and is incorporated herein
by reference. See “Executive Compensation” and “Election of
Directors.”
Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial
Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters
Information
regarding beneficial ownership of ARI’s common stock and common stock authorized
for issuance under equity compensation plans is included in ARI’s definitive
2009 Annual Meeting Proxy Statement and is incorporated herein by
reference. See “Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners” and
“Equity Compensation Plan Information.”
Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related
Transactions
Information
related to Certain Relationships and Related Transactions is included in ARI’s
definitive 2009 Annual Meeting Proxy Statement, and is incorporated herein by
reference. See “Certain Transactions.”
Item 14. Principal Accountant Fees and
Services
Information
regarding Principal Accountant Fees and Services is included in ARI’s definitive
2009 Annual Meeting Proxy Statement, and is incorporated herein by
reference. See “Ratification of Independent Auditors.”
PART
IV
Exhibit
Number
|
Description
|
2.1
|
Stock
Purchase Agreement dated January 26, 2007, by and among OC-Net, Inc., the
stockholders of OC-Net, Inc. and the Company, incorporated by reference to
the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on January 29,
2007.
|
2.2
|
Asset
Purchase Agreement dated July 1, 2008 between the Company, Eye
Communication Systems, Inc. and John Bessent, incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 2.1 of the Company’s Form 8-K filed on July 7,
2008.
|
2.3
|
Asset
Purchase Agreement dated April 27, 2009 by and among the Company, Channel
Blade Technologies Corp., Charles Lewis and Michael Sifen, incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 2.1 of the Company’s Form 8-K filed May 1,
2009.
|
3.1
|
Articles
of Incorporation of the Company, as amended, incorporated herein by
reference to Exhibit 3.1 of the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q
for the fiscal quarter ended April 30, 1999.
|
3.2
|
Articles
of Amendment of the Company, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit
3.2 of Form 8-K filed on August 18, 2003.
|
3.3
|
By-laws
of the Company incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 3.1 of the
Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-l (Reg. No.
33-43148).
|
4.1
|
Form
of Promissory Note of the Company (issued under Exchange Agreement listed
as Exhibit 10.4), incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4.1 of the
Company’s Form 10-Q for the quarter ended April 30,
2003.
|
4.2
|
Promissory
Note dated August 7, 2003 payable to WITECH Corporation, incorporated
herein by reference to Exhibit 4.1 of the Company’s Form 8-K filed on
August 8, 2003.
|
4.3
|
Non-Negotiable
Secured Subordinated Promissory Note payable to Channel Blade Technologies
Corp., incorporated by reference to the Company’s Form 8-K filed May 1,
2009.
|
4.4
|
The
Company agrees to furnish to the Commission upon request copies of any
agreements with respect to long term debt not exceeding 10% of the
Company’s consolidated assets.
|
10.1*
|
1991
Stock Option Plan, as amended, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit
10.2 of the Company’s Form 10-Q for the quarter ended January 31,
1999.
|
10.2*
|
1993
Director Stock Option Plan, as amended, incorporated herein by reference
to Exhibit 10.3 of the Company’s Form 10-Q for the quarter ended January
31, 1999.
|
10.3
|
Exchange
Agreement dated April 24, 2003 between ARI Network Services, Inc., ARI
Network Services Partners, LP, Dolphin Offshore Partners, LP and SDS
Merchant Fund, LP, including form of Common Stock Purchase Warrant
(Exhibit B), incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the
Company’s Form 10-Q for the quarter ended April 30,
2003.
|
10.4
|
Rights
Agreement dated as of August 7, 2003, between the Company and American
Stock Transfer & Trust Company, as Rights Agent, incorporated herein
by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of Form 8-K filed on August 18,
2003.
|
10.5*
|
Summary
of Executive Bonus Arrangements (Fiscal 2006), incorporated herein by
reference to Exhibit 10.7 of the Company’s Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year
ended July 31, 2005.
|
Exhibit
Number |
Description |
10.6*
|
Summary
of Executive Bonus Arrangements (Fiscal 2007), incorporated herein by
reference to Exhibit 10.8 of the Company’s Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year
ended July 31, 2006.
|
10.7
*
|
Summary
of Executive Bonus Arrangements (Fiscal 2008), incorporated herein by
reference to Exhibit 10.9 of the Company’s Form 10-K for the fiscal year
ended July 31, 2008.
|
10.8
|
Summary
of Executive Bonus Arrangements (Fiscal 2009).
|
10.9
|
Letter
agreement dated June 25, 2003 between the Company and Ascent Partners,
Inc. incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Company’s
Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended January 31, 2004.
|
10.10
|
Credit
Agreement dated July 9, 2004 between the Company and Bank One,
NA, incorporated by reference to exhibit 10.14 of the Company’s
Form 10-KSB for the year ended July 31, 2004.
|
10.11
|
Amendment
to Credit Agreement dated February 15, 2005, between the Company and
JPMorgan Chase Bank, NA, successor by merger to Bank One,
NA., incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.14 of the
Company’s Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended July 31,
2005.
|
10.12
|
Continuing
Security Agreement dated July 9, 2004, between the Company and JPMorgan
Chase Bank, NA, successor by merger to Bank One, NA., incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.15 of the Company’s Form 10-KSB for the year ended
July 31, 2004.
|
10.13
|
Line
of credit note dated July 9, 2004 by the Company for $500,000,
incorporated by reference to exhibit 10.16 of the Company’s Form 10-KSB
for the year ended July 31, 2005.
|
10.14
|
Note
Modification Agreement dated February 15, 2005 to the Line of Credit Note
dated July 9, 2004 by the Company for $500,000, incorporated herein by
reference to Exhibit 10.17 of the Company’s Form 10-KSB for the fiscal
year ended July 31, 2005.
|
10.15
|
Note
Modification Agreement dated October 26, 2006, to the Line of Credit Note
dated July 9, 2004 by the Company for $1,000,000, incorporated herein by
reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Company’s Form 8-K filed on October 31,
2006.
|
10.16
|
Note
Modification Agreement dated April 25, 2006 to the Line of Credit Note
dated July 9, 2004 by the Company for $500,000, incorporated herein by
reference to Exhibit 10.16 of the Company’s Form 10-KSB for the fiscal
year ended July 31, 2006.
|
10.17
|
Consulting
Agreement dated January 3, 2005 between the Company and Ascent Partners,
Inc., incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of Form 8-K filed on
January 4, 2005.
|
10.18
|
First
Amendment to Rights Agreement dated November 10, 2005, between the Company
and American Stock Transfer & Trust Company, as Rights Agent,
incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of Form 8-K filed on November
14, 2005.
|
10.19
|
Amendment
to Credit Agreement dated May 10, 2007, between the Company and JP Morgan
Chase Bank, NA, successor by merger to Bank One, NA, incorporated by
reference to the Company’s Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended April 30,
2007.
|
10.20
|
Note
Modification Agreement dated May 10, 2007, between the Company and JP
Morgan Chase Bank, NA, successor by merger to Bank One, NA, incorporated
by reference to the Company’s Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended April 30,
2007.
|
10.21
|
Note
Modification Agreement dated April 25, 2008, between the Company and JP
Morgan Chase Bank, NA, successor by merger to Bank One,
NA.
|
10.22
|
Credit
Agreement Amendment dated 4/6/09, incorporated by reference to
Form 10-Q for the quarter ended April 30,
2009.
|
Exhibit
Number |
Description |
10.23*
|
Change
of Control Agreement dated April 1, 2006 between the Company and Brian E.
Dearing, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Company’s Form
10-QSB for the quarter ended October 31, 2007.
|
10.24*
|
Change
of Control Agreement dated April 1, 2006 between the Company and John C.
Bray, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 of the Company’s Form
10-QSB for the quarter ended October 31, 2007.
|
10.25*
|
Change
of Control Agreement dated September 13, 2006 between the Company and Roy
W. Olivier, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 of the Company’s
Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended October 31, 2007.
|
10.26*
|
Change
of Control Agreement dated July 31, 2008 between the Company and Robert J.
Hipp, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.24 of the Company’s Form
10-K for the year ended July 31, 2008.
|
10.27*
|
Employment
Agreement dated March 13, 2008 between the Company and Brian E. Dearing,
incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Company’s Form 10-QSB for
the quarter ended January 31, 2008.
|
10.28*
|
Employment
Agreement dated May 1, 2008 between the Company and Roy W. Olivier,
incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Company’s Form 8-K filed
on May 2, 2008.
|
10.29*
|
2000
Stock Option Plan, as amended, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1
of the Company’s Form 10-Q for the quarter ended April 30,
2008.
|
10.30*
|
Separation
and Consulting Agreement dated June 16, 2009 between the Company and
Kenneth S. Folberg, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the
Company’s Form 8-K filed on June 17, 2009.
|
|
Employment
Agreement dated July , 2008 between the Company and Michael
Tenpas.
|
|
Change
of Control Agreement dated July 31, 2008 between the Company and Michael
Tenpas.
|
|
Subsidiaries
of the Company.
|
|
Consent
of Wipfli LLP.
|
24.1
|
Powers
of Attorney appear on the signature page hereof.
|
|
Section
302 Certification of Chief Executive Officer.
|
|
Section
302 Certification of Chief Financial Officer.
|
|
Section
906 Certification of Chief Executive Officer.
|
|
Section
906 Certification of Chief Financial Officer.
|
|
Forward-Looking
Statements Disclosure.
|
*
Management Contract or Compensatory Plan.
Pursuant
to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, the registrant has caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the
undersigned, thereunto duly authorized, on this 29th day of October
2009.
|
ARI
NETWORK SERVICES, INC.
|
|
|
|
By: /s/ Roy
W. Olivier
|
|
Roy
W. Olivier
|
|
President
and Chief Executive Officer
|
|
|
|
By: /s/
Brian E. Dearing
|
|
Brian
E. Dearing
|
|
Chairman
of the Board and Interim Chief Financial
Officer
|
KNOW ALL
MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, that each person whose signature appears below
constitutes and appoints Roy W. Olivier and Brian E. Dearing, his true and
lawful attorney-in-fact and agent with full power of substitution and
resubstitution, for him and his name, place and stead, in any and all
capacities, to sign any and all amendments to this report and to file the same
with all exhibits thereto, and other documents in connection therewith, with the
Commission, granting unto said attorney-in-fact and agent full power and
authority to do and perform each act and thing requisite and necessary to be
done, as fully to all intents and purposes as he might or could do in person,
hereby ratifying and confirming all that said attorney-in-fact and agent, or his
substitute or substitutes, may lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue
hereof.
Pursuant
to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been
signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the
capacities and on the dates indicated.
/s/ Brian E. Dearing
|
October
29, 2009
|
Brian
E. Dearing
|
|
Chairman
of the Board
|
|
|
|
/s/ Roy W. Olivier
|
October
29, 2009
|
Roy
W. Olivier
|
|
Director
|
|
|
|
/s/ Gordon J. Bridge
|
October
29, 2009
|
Gordon
J. Bridge
|
|
Director
|
|
|
|
/s/ Ted C. Feierstein
|
October
29, 2009
|
Ted
C. Feierstein
|
|
Director
|
|
|
|
/s/ William C. Mortimore
|
October
29, 2009
|
William
C. Mortimore
|
|
Director
|
|
|
|
/s/ P. Lee Poseidon
|
October
29, 2009
|
P.
Lee Poseidon
|
|
Director
|
|
Report
of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
To the
Board of Directors and Shareholders
ARI
Network Services, Inc.
We have
audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of ARI Network Services,
Inc. and Subsidiaries (the Company) as of July 31, 2009 and 2008 and the related
consolidated statements of income, shareholders’ equity and cash flows for the
years then ended. These financial statements are the responsibility of the
Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these
financial statements based on our audits.
We
conducted our audits in accordance with standards of the Public Company
Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan
and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the
financial statements are free of material misstatement. The Company is not
required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal
control over financial reporting. Our audit included consideration of internal
control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that
are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an
opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial
reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also includes
examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in
the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and
significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall
financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a
reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our
opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all
material respects, the financial position of the Company as of July 31, 2009 and
2008 and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the years then
ended, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United
States.
Wipfli
LLP
Milwaukee,
Wisconsin
October
29, 2009
Consolidated Financial
Statements
ARI
Network Services, Inc.
Years
ended July 31, 2009 and 2008
ARI
Network Services, Inc.
|
|
Consolidated
Balance Sheet
|
|
(Dollars
in Thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ASSETS
|
|
July
31
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
Current
assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash
|
|
$ |
650 |
|
|
$ |
1,086 |
|
Trade
receivables, less allowance for doubtful accounts of $410 and $178 at July
31, 2009 and 2008
|
|
|
1,352 |
|
|
|
1,304 |
|
Work
in process
|
|
|
156 |
|
|
|
264 |
|
Prepaid
expenses and other
|
|
|
321 |
|
|
|
392 |
|
Deferred
income taxes
|
|
|
513 |
|
|
|
330 |
|
Total
Current Assets
|
|
|
2,992 |
|
|
|
3,376 |
|
Equipment
and leasehold improvements:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Computer
equipment
|
|
|
1,827 |
|
|
|
5,647 |
|
Leasehold
improvements
|
|
|
463 |
|
|
|
198 |
|
Furniture
and equipment
|
|
|
2,479 |
|
|
|
2,842 |
|
|
|
|
4,769 |
|
|
|
8,687 |
|
Less
accumulated depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
2,827 |
|
|
|
7,523 |
|
Net
equipment and leasehold improvements
|
|
|
1,942 |
|
|
|
1,164 |
|
Capitalized
software product costs:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amounts
capitalized for software product costs
|
|
|
14,886 |
|
|
|
13,209 |
|
Less
accumulated amortization
|
|
|
12,489 |
|
|
|
11,613 |
|
Net
capitalized software product costs
|
|
|
2,397 |
|
|
|
1,596 |
|
Deferred
income taxes
|
|
|
2,141 |
|
|
|
2,412 |
|
Other
long term assets
|
|
|
59 |
|
|
|
53 |
|
Other
intangible assets
|
|
|
3,637 |
|
|
|
1,396 |
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
5,439 |
|
|
|
2,196 |
|
Total
Assets
|
|
$ |
18,607 |
|
|
$ |
12,193 |
|
See
accompanying notes
ARI
Network Services, Inc.
|
|
Consolidated
Balance Sheet
|
|
(Dollars
in Thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES
AND SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY
|
|
July
31
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
Current
liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current
borrowings on line of credit
|
|
$ |
500 |
|
|
$ |
700 |
|
Current
portion of notes payable
|
|
|
117 |
|
|
|
676 |
|
Accounts
payable
|
|
|
788 |
|
|
|
408 |
|
Deferred
revenue
|
|
|
5,523 |
|
|
|
5,071 |
|
Accrued
payroll and related liabilities
|
|
|
1,421 |
|
|
|
922 |
|
Accrued
sales, use and income taxes
|
|
|
82 |
|
|
|
80 |
|
Other
accrued liabilities
|
|
|
729 |
|
|
|
899 |
|
Current
portion of capital lease obligations
|
|
|
109 |
|
|
|
95 |
|
Total
current liabilities
|
|
|
9,269 |
|
|
|
8,851 |
|
Non-current
liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notes
payable (net of discount)
|
|
|
5,000 |
|
|
|
116 |
|
Long-term
portion of accrued compensation
|
|
|
36 |
|
|
|
97 |
|
Capital
lease obligations
|
|
|
115 |
|
|
|
233 |
|
Total
non-current liabilities
|
|
|
5,151 |
|
|
|
446 |
|
Total
liabilities
|
|
|
14,420 |
|
|
|
9,297 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shareholders'
equity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cumulative
preferred stock, par value $.001 per share, 1,000,000 shares authorized; 0
shares issued and outstanding at July 31, 2009
and 2008
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
Junior
preferred stock, par value $.001 per share, 100,000 shares authorized; 0
shares issued and outstanding at July 31, 2009
and 2008
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
Common
stock, par value $.001 per share, 25,000,000 shares authorized; 7,693,510
and 6,971,927 shares issues and outstanding at July 31, 2009
and 2008
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
Common
stock warrants and options
|
|
|
816 |
|
|
|
501 |
|
Additional
paid-in-capital
|
|
|
95,681 |
|
|
|
95,148 |
|
Accumulated
deficit
|
|
|
(92,284 |
) |
|
|
(92,708 |
) |
Other
accumulated comprehensive income (loss)
|
|
|
(34 |
) |
|
|
(52 |
) |
Total
Shareholders' Equity
|
|
|
4,187 |
|
|
|
2,896 |
|
Total
Liabilities and Shareholders' Equity
|
|
$ |
18,607 |
|
|
$ |
12,193 |
|
See
accompanying notes
ARI
Network Services, Inc.
|
|
Consolidated
Statements of Income
|
|
(Dollars
in Thousands, Except per Share Data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year
ended July 31
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
Net
revenue
|
|
$ |
17,637 |
|
|
$ |
16,917 |
|
Cost
of revenue
|
|
|
3,412 |
|
|
|
2,871 |
|
Gross
margin
|
|
|
14,225 |
|
|
|
14,046 |
|
Operating
expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales
and marketing
|
|
|
4,072 |
|
|
|
3,448 |
|
Customer
operations and support
|
|
|
2,785 |
|
|
|
2,728 |
|
Software
development and technical support (net of capitalized product
costs)
|
|
|
1,288 |
|
|
|
1,656 |
|
General
and administrative
|
|
|
4,212 |
|
|
|
4,137 |
|
Restructuring
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
529 |
|
Depreciation
and amortization (exclusive of amortization of software products included
in cost of products and services sold)
|
|
|
1,101 |
|
|
|
727 |
|
Net
operating expenses
|
|
|
13,458 |
|
|
|
13,225 |
|
Operating
income
|
|
|
767 |
|
|
|
821 |
|
Other
income (expense):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest
expense
|
|
|
(214 |
) |
|
|
(99 |
) |
Other,
net
|
|
|
(6 |
) |
|
|
71 |
|
Total
other income (expense)
|
|
|
(220 |
) |
|
|
(28 |
) |
Income
before provision for income taxes
|
|
|
547 |
|
|
|
793 |
|
Income
tax benefit (expense)
|
|
|
(123 |
) |
|
|
590 |
|
Net
income
|
|
$ |
424 |
|
|
$ |
1,383 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
and diluted net income per common share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$ |
0.06 |
|
|
$ |
0.21 |
|
Diluted
|
|
$ |
0.06 |
|
|
$ |
0.20 |
|
See
accompanying notes
ARI
Network Services, Inc.
|
|
Consolidated
Statements of Shareholders' Equity
|
|
(Dollars
in Thousands, Except per Share Data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common
Stock
|
|
|
Paid
in Capital |
|
|
Accumulated
Deficit |
|
|
Other
Accumulated Comprehensive Loss |
|
|
Total
Shareholders' Equity |
|
|
|
Shares
Issued and Outstanding
|
|
|
Par
Value
|
|
|
Warrants
& Options
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance
July 31, 2007
|
|
|
6,623,605 |
|
|
$ |
7 |
|
|
$ |
195 |
|
|
$ |
94,627 |
|
|
$ |
(94,091 |
) |
|
$ |
(20 |
) |
|
$ |
718 |
|
Issuance
of common stock under stock purchase plan
|
|
|
5,541 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
7 |
|
Issuance
of common stock as contribution to 401(k) plan
|
|
|
30,090 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
48 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
48 |
|
Return
of common stock from 401(k) plan
|
|
|
(6,031 |
) |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(10 |
) |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(10 |
) |
Issuance
of common stock under executive bonus plan
|
|
|
6,222 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
7 |
|
Issuance
of common stock related to acquisitions
|
|
|
312,500 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
469 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
469 |
|
Stock
based compensation
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
306 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
306 |
|
Net
income
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
1,383 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
1,383 |
|
Foreign
currency translation adjustments
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(32 |
) |
|
|
(32 |
) |
Comprehensive
income
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
1,383 |
|
|
|
(32 |
) |
|
|
1,351 |
|
Balance
July 31, 2008
|
|
|
6,971,927 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
501 |
|
|
|
95,148 |
|
|
|
(92,708 |
) |
|
|
(52 |
) |
|
|
2,896 |
|
Issuance
of common stock under stock purchase plan
|
|
|
4,359 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
4 |
|
Issuance
of common stock under executive bonus plan
|
|
|
8,642 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
8 |
|
Issuance
of common stock as contribution to 401(k) plan
|
|
|
32,955 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
45 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
45 |
|
Issuance
of common stock from exercise of stock options
|
|
|
60,242 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
16 |
|
Issuance
of common stock related to acquisitions
|
|
|
615,385 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
460 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
461 |
|
Stock
based compensation
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
315 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
315 |
|
Net
income
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
424 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
424 |
|
Foreign
currency translation adjustments
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
18 |
|
Comprehensive
income
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
424 |
|
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
442 |
|
Balance
July 31, 2009
|
|
|
7,693,510 |
|
|
$ |
8 |
|
|
$ |
816 |
|
|
$ |
95,681 |
|
|
$ |
(92,284 |
) |
|
$ |
(34 |
) |
|
$ |
4,187 |
|
Shareholders'
Equity Includes cumulative preferred stock, par value $.001 per share, 1,000,000
shares authorized; 0 shares issued and outstanding at July 31, 2007, July 31,
2008 and July 31, 2009.
Shareholders'
Equity includes junior preferred stock, par value $.001 per share, 100,000
shares authorized; 0 shares issued and outstanding at July 31, 2007, July 31,
2008 and July 31, 2009.
See
accompanying notes
ARI
Network Services, Inc.
|
|
Consolidated
Statements of Shareholders' Equity
|
|
(Dollars
in Thousands, Except per Share Data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year
ended July 31
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
Operating
activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
income
|
|
$ |
424 |
|
|
$ |
1,383 |
|
Adjustments
to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating
activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization
of software products
|
|
|
876 |
|
|
|
764 |
|
Amortization
of deferred financing costs, debt discount and excess carrying value over
face amount of notes payable
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
25 |
|
Depreciation
and other amortization
|
|
|
1,101 |
|
|
|
727 |
|
Allowance
for investment in Bank Note
|
|
|
127 |
|
|
|
- |
|
Deferred
income taxes
|
|
|
88 |
|
|
|
(648 |
) |
Stock
based compensation related to stock options
|
|
|
315 |
|
|
|
306 |
|
Stock
issued as contribution to 401(k) plan
|
|
|
45 |
|
|
|
38 |
|
Net
change in assets and liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trade
receivables, net
|
|
|
235 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
Work
in process
|
|
|
108 |
|
|
|
(41 |
) |
Prepaid
expenses and other
|
|
|
89 |
|
|
|
(91 |
) |
Other
long term assets
|
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
|
(53 |
) |
Accounts
payable
|
|
|
137 |
|
|
|
(364 |
) |
Deferred
revenue
|
|
|
(859 |
) |
|
|
(571 |
) |
Accrued
payroll related liabilities
|
|
|
352 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
Accrued
sales, use and income taxes
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
52 |
|
Other
accrued liabilities
|
|
|
(298 |
) |
|
|
482 |
|
Net
cash provided by operating activities
|
|
|
2,745 |
|
|
|
2,027 |
|
Investing
activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase
of equipment, software and leasehold improvements
|
|
|
(692 |
) |
|
|
(119 |
) |
Cash
paid for goodwill and intangible assets related to
acquisitions
|
|
|
(645 |
) |
|
|
(769 |
) |
Cash
paid for other net assets related to acquisitions
|
|
|
(123 |
) |
|
|
(239 |
) |
Software
product costs capitalized
|
|
|
(759 |
) |
|
|
(524 |
) |
Net
cash used in investing activities
|
|
|
(2,219 |
) |
|
|
(1,651 |
) |
Financing
activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Borrowings
(repayments) under line of credit
|
|
|
(200 |
) |
|
|
700 |
|
Payments
under notes payable
|
|
|
(684 |
) |
|
|
(1,035 |
) |
Payments
of capital lease obligations
|
|
|
(104 |
) |
|
|
(25 |
) |
Proceeds
from issuance of common stock
|
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
Net
cash used in financing activities
|
|
|
(968 |
) |
|
|
(353 |
) |
Effect
of foreign currency exchange rate changes on cash
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
13 |
|
Net
change in cash
|
|
|
(436 |
) |
|
|
36 |
|
Cash
at beginning of period
|
|
|
1,086 |
|
|
|
1,050 |
|
Cash
at end of period
|
|
$ |
650 |
|
|
$ |
1,086 |
|
Cash
paid for interest
|
|
$ |
211 |
|
|
$ |
109 |
|
Cash
paid for income taxes
|
|
$ |
28 |
|
|
$ |
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noncash
investing and financing activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital
lease obligations incurred for computer equipment
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
334 |
|
Capital
lease obligations acquired in connection with acquisitions
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
6 |
|
Accrued
liabilities related to purchase of computer equipment
|
|
|
86 |
|
|
|
- |
|
Accrued
liabilities assumed in connection with acquisitions
|
|
|
1,691 |
|
|
|
113 |
|
Debt
issued in connection with acquisition
|
|
|
5,000 |
|
|
|
300 |
|
Issuance
of common stock related to payment of executive bonus
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
Issuance
of common stock in connection with acquisitions
|
|
|
461 |
|
|
|
469 |
|
See
accompanying notes
ARI
Network Services, Inc.
Notes
to Consolidated Financial Statements
1.
|
Description of Business and
Significant Accounting
Policies
|
Description
of Business
ARI
Network Services, Inc. (the “Company” or “ARI”) is a leading provider of
technology enabled services that help dealers, distributors and manufacturers
reduce costs and increase sales in selected vertical
markets. Specifically, ARI provides electronics parts catalogs,
dealer e-commerce solutions, professional services and outsourced finance and
insurance ("F&I") services in about a dozen vertical markets worldwide,
including outdoor power, power sports, motorcycles, marine, recreational
vehicles ("RV"), appliances, agricultural equipment, floor maintenance
and construction. ARI currently serves over 20,000
dealers, 100 manufacturers and 150 distributors in more than 100
countries worldwide.
Manufacturers
and distributors drive revenue, efficiency and customer satisfaction by
leveraging ARI’s technology enabled services and dealer relationships, and look
to ARI as a partner to reach their dealers. Dealers rely on ARI’s technology
enabled services and extensive network of manufacturer and distributor
relationships to attain content and technology solutions, which results in
improved revenue, efficiency and customer satisfaction.
ARI
operates primarily in two geographical segments: the U.S. and Netherlands-based
European operations. Each provides technology-enabled business
solutions that connect manufacturers in selected industries with their service
and distribution networks. Segmented operating information is provided to the
Company’s chief operating decision makers.
No single
customer accounted for 10% or more of ARI’s revenue in fiscal 2009 or
2008.
Reclassifications
Beginning
in fiscal 2009, the Company reports revenue in total on the income statement
rather than by service type and has reclassified the components of operating
expenses. Beginning in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2008, the Company
reports net changes in assets and liabilities in detail on the Statement of Cash
Flows rather than in the condensed format, as has been done
historically. The fiscal 2008 financial statements have been
reclassified to conform to the fiscal 2009 presentation.
Principles
of Consolidation
The
financial statements include the accounts of ARI Network Services, Inc. (the
“Company”) and its wholly owned subsidiaries, ARI Europe B. V. and ARI F&I
Services, LLC (“AFIS”), formerly known as ARI Outsourced F&I Center, LLC
(“OFIC”). Operations of OFIC were suspended in December 2007, and re-initiated
on April 18, 2009, when the Company acquired a small outsourced finance and
insurance ("F&I") business in Schenectady, NY. All inter-company
transactions and balances have been eliminated.
The
functional currency of the Company’s subsidiary in the Netherlands is the Euro;
accordingly, monetary assets and liabilities are translated into U.S. dollars at
the rate of exchange existing at the end of the period, and non-monetary assets
and liabilities are translated into U.S. dollars at historical exchange rates.
Income and expense amounts, except for those related to assets translated at
historical rates, are translated at the weighted-average exchange rates during
the period. Adjustments resulting from the re-measurement of the financial
statements into the functional currency are charged or credited to comprehensive
income (loss).
Cash
and Cash Equivalents
For
purposes of the statements of cash flows, the Company considers all highly
liquid debt instruments purchased with an original maturity of three months or
less to be cash equivalents.
The
Company’s investment policy, as approved by the Board of Directors, is designed
to provide preservation of capital, adequate liquidity to meet projected cash
requirements, optimum yields in relationship to risk, market conditions and tax
considerations and minimum risk of principal loss through diversified short and
medium term investments. Eligible investments include direct
obligations of the U.S. Treasury, obligations issued or guaranteed by the U.S.
government, certain time deposits, certificates of deposits issued by commercial
banks, money market mutual funds, asset backed securities and municipal
bonds. The Company’s current investments include money market mutual
funds with terms not exceeding ninety days.
Concentrations
Financial
instruments that potentially subject the Company to concentrations of credit
risk consist primarily of cash deposits in bank accounts. Deposits in
excess of amounts insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) of
approximately $250,000 on interest-bearing accounts as of July 31, 2009 and
$100,000 as of July 31, 2008 are exposed to loss in the event of nonperformance
by the institution. The Company had cash deposits in excess of the
FDIC insurance coverage of $400,000 and $986,000 as of July 31, 2009 and 2008,
respectively.
Trade
Receivables and Credit Policy
Trade
receivables are uncollateralized customer obligations due on normal trade terms,
most of which require payment within 30 days from the invoice
date. Payments of trade receivables are allocated to the specific
invoices identified on the customer’s remittance advice or, if unspecified, are
applied to the earliest unpaid invoices.
The
carrying amount of trade receivables is reduced by an allowance that reflects
management’s best estimate of the amounts that will not be
collected. Management individually reviews all receivable balances
that exceed 60 days from the invoice date and based on an assessment of current
creditworthiness, estimates the portion, if any, of the balance that will not be
collected. The allowance for potential credit losses is reflected as
an offset to trade receivables in the accompanying balance
sheets. The Company recorded bad debt expense in the Consolidated
Statements of Income of $110,000 and $52,000 for the fiscal years ended July 31,
2009 and 2008, respectively.
Work
in Process
Work in
process consists of billable professional services performed by the Company, for
which revenue was recognized pursuant to contract accounting primarily using the
percentage-of-completion method with progress-to-completion measured based upon
labor hours incurred, which have not been invoiced as of the end of the
reporting period.
Revenue
Recognition
Revenue
for use of the network and for information services is recognized on a
straight-line basis over the period of the contract.
Revenue
from annual or periodic maintenance fees is recognized ratably over the period
the maintenance is provided. Revenue from catalog subscriptions is recognized on
a straight-line basis over the subscription term.
Revenue
from software licenses in multiple element arrangements is recognized ratably
over the contractual term of the arrangement. The Company considers all
arrangements with payment terms extending beyond 12 months not to be fixed or
determinable and evaluates other arrangements with payment terms longer than
normal to determine whether the arrangement is fixed or determinable. If the fee
is not fixed or determinable, revenue is recognized as payments become due from
the customer. Arrangements that include acceptance terms beyond the Company’s
standard terms are not recognized until acceptance has occurred. If
collectability is not considered probable, revenue is recognized when the fee is
collected.
Arrangements
that include professional services are evaluated to determine whether those
services are essential to the functionality of other elements of the
arrangement. Types of services that are considered essential include customizing
complex features and functionality in a product’s base software code or
developing complex interfaces within a customer’s environment. When professional
services are not considered essential, the revenue allocable to the professional
services is recognized as the services are performed. When professional services
are considered essential, revenue under the arrangement is recognized pursuant
to contract accounting using the percentage-of-completion method with
progress-to-completion measured based upon labor hours incurred. When the
current estimates of total contract revenue and contract cost indicate a loss, a
provision for the entire loss on the contract is made in the period the amount
is determined.
Revenue
on arrangements with customers who are not the ultimate users (resellers) is
deferred if there is any uncertainty regarding the ability and intent of the
reseller to sell such software independent of their payment to the
Company.
Amounts
invoiced to customers prior to recognition as revenue as discussed above are
reflected in the accompanying balance sheets as deferred revenue.
Use
of Estimates
The
preparation of the Company’s financial statements in conformity with accounting
principles generally accepted in the U.S. requires management to make estimates
and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the financial statements and
accompanying notes. Actual results could differ from those estimates. The
Company considers capitalization and amortization of software product costs,
realizability and valuation of intangible assets, accruals for anticipated
losses on projects and litigation, sales tax liabilities, various contract
arrangements, and the deferred tax valuation allowance to be significant
estimates that are subject to change in the near term.
Equipment
and Leasehold Improvements
Equipment
and leasehold improvements are stated at cost. Depreciation and amortization are
computed under the straight-line method for financial reporting purposes and
accelerated methods for income tax purposes. Depreciation and amortization have
been provided over the estimated useful lives of the assets as
follows:
|
|
Years
|
Computer
equipment
|
|
3-7
|
Leashold
improvements
|
|
2-7
|
Furniture
and equipment
|
|
3-5
|
Leasehold
improvements are amortized over the useful lives of the assets or the term of
the related lease agreement, whichever is shorter.
Capitalized
and Purchased Software Product Costs
Certain
software development and acquisition costs are capitalized when incurred.
Capitalization of these costs begins upon the establishment of technological
feasibility. The establishment of technological feasibility and the on-going
assessment of recoverability of software costs require considerable judgment by
management with respect to certain external factors, including, but not limited
to, the determination of technological feasibility, anticipated future gross
revenues, estimated economic life and changes in software and hardware
technologies.
The
annual amortization of software products is the greater of the amount computed
using: (a) the ratio that current gross revenues for the network or a software
product bear to the total of current and anticipated future gross revenues for
the network or a software product, or (b) the straight-line method over the
estimated economic life of the product which currently runs from three to five
years. Amortization starts when the product is available for general release to
customers. All other software development and support expenditures
are charged to expense in the period incurred.
Impairment
of Long-Lived Assets
In
accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 144,
“Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets”, equipment and
leasehold improvements and capitalized software product costs are reviewed for
impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the
carrying amount may not be recoverable. If the sum of the expected undiscounted
cash flows is less than the carrying value of the related asset or group of
assets, a loss is recognized for the difference between the fair value and
carrying value of the asset or group of assets. Such analyses
necessarily involve judgment. The Company evaluated the ongoing value of its
long-lived assets as of July 31, 2009 and 2008. During fiscal 2009,
the Company disposed of fully depreciated long-lived assets with a cost basis of
$5,309,000. The Company did not incur any impairment charges in
fiscal 2009 and 2008.
Capitalized
Interest Costs
In 2009
and 2008, interest costs of $9,000 and $3,000, respectively, were capitalized
and included in the capitalized software product costs.
Insurance
Premiums Receivable
The
Company is the beneficiary of the total premiums it paid on a split-dollar life
insurance policy at the death of the policy holder. Insurance
premiums receivable are recorded at present value based on the average life
expectancy of the policy holder and are included in other long term
assets. Insurance premiums receivable consisted of $59,000 and
$53,000 at July 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively, which is the present value of
future life insurance premiums receivable of approximately $237,000 discounted
at an average rate of 9% and averaged over 17 and 18 years. There was
no life insurance premiums receivable recorded prior to July 31,
2008.
Fair
Value Measurements
Effective
July 1, 2008, the Company adopted SFAS No. 157, “Fair Value
Measurements”. SFAS No. 157 clarifies how companies are required to
use a fair value measure for recognition and disclosure by establishing a common
definition of fair value, creating a framework for measuring fair value, and
expanding disclosures about fair value measurements. SFAS No. 157
establishes a three-tier fair value hierarchy, which prioritizes the inputs used
in measuring fair value. These tiers include Level 1, defined as
observable inputs such as quoted market prices in active markets; Level 2,
defined as inputs other than quoted market prices in active markets that are
either directly or indirectly observable; and Level 3, defined as unobservable
inputs in which little or no market data exists, therefore, requiring an entity
to develop its own assumptions. The adoption of SFAS No. 157 did not
have a material impact on the Company’s result of operations or financial
position.
The
Company measures many financial instruments and certain other items at fair
value. Unrealized gains and losses on items for which the fair value option has
been elected are recognized in earnings.
Using
Level 3 inputs, the Company evaluated the fair market value of a note receivable
with a book value of approximately $127,000 and, based on managements’
expectation of collection, booked an allowance to the note resulting in a fair
market value of $0 at July 31, 2009.
Shipping
and Handling
Revenue
received from shipping and handling fees is reflected in net
revenue. Costs incurred for shipping and handling are reported in
cost of products and services sold.
Income
Taxes
Income
taxes are accounted for using an asset and liability approach, which requires
the recognition of taxes payable or refundable for the current year and deferred
tax liabilities and assets for the future tax consequences of events that have
been recognized in the financial statements or tax returns. The measurement of
current and deferred tax assets and liabilities is based on provisions of
enacted tax laws; the effects of potential future changes in tax laws or rates
are not anticipated. If it is more likely than not that full realization of
deferred income tax benefits is not expected, a deferred tax valuation allowance
is recorded.
Foreign
Currency Translation
The
Company’s Netherland subsidiary uses the euro as its functional currency.
Accordingly, assets and liabilities are translated into U.S. dollars at year-end
exchange rates, and revenues and expenses are translated at weighted-average
exchange rates. The resulting translation adjustment is recorded as a separate
component of shareholders’ equity and will be included in the determination of
net income (loss) only upon sale or liquidation of the subsidiary.
Stock-Based
Compensation
The
Company uses the Black-Scholes model to value stock options granted. Expected
volatility is based on historical volatility of the Company’s stock. The
expected life of options granted represents the period of time that options
granted are expected to be outstanding. The risk-free rate for periods within
the contractual term of the options is based on the U.S. Treasury yields in
effect at the time of grant. As stock-based compensation expense recognized in
our results of operations is based on awards ultimately expected to vest, the
amount has been reduced for estimated forfeitures. SFAS 123(R),
“Share-Based Payments” requires forfeitures to be estimated at the time of grant
and revised, if necessary, in subsequent periods if actual forfeitures differ
from those estimates. Forfeitures were estimated based on our historical
experience. There were no capitalized stock-based compensation costs at July 31,
2009 and 2008.
Comprehensive
Income (Loss)
Comprehensive
income is a more inclusive financial reporting method that includes disclosure
of financial information that historically has not been recognized in the
calculation of net income. The Company has reported Comprehensive Income which
includes net income and foreign currency translation adjustments in the
Consolidated Statements of Shareholders’ Equity for the years ended July 31,
2009 and 2008.
Basic
and Diluted Net Income per Common Share
Basic net
income per common share is computed by dividing net income by the basic weighted
average number of common shares outstanding during the
period. Diluted net income per common share is computed by dividing
net income by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during
the period and reflects the potential dilution that could occur if all of the
Company’s outstanding stock options and warrants that are in the money were
exercised (calculated using the treasury stock method).
The
following table is a reconciliation of basic and diluted net income per common
share for the periods indicated (in thousands, except per share
data):
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
Net
income
|
|
$ |
424 |
|
|
$ |
1,383 |
|
Weighted-average
common shares outstanding
|
|
|
7,203 |
|
|
|
6,678 |
|
Effect
of dilutive stock options and warrants
|
|
|
25 |
|
|
|
225 |
|
Diluted
weighted-average common shares outstanding
|
|
|
7,228 |
|
|
|
6,903 |
|
Net
income per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$ |
0.06 |
|
|
$ |
0.21 |
|
Diluted
|
|
$ |
0.06 |
|
|
$ |
0.20 |
|
Options
that could potentially dilute net income per share in the future that are
not included in the computation of diluted net income per share, as their
impact is anti-dilutive
|
|
|
1,394 |
|
|
|
941 |
|
Goodwill
and Other Intangible Assets
Under
(SFAS) No. 142, “Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets”, goodwill and intangible
assets deemed to have indefinite lives are not amortized, but are subject to
annual impairment tests. Intangible assets with definitive lives at July 31,
2009 and 2008 consist primarily of costs of customer relationships, which are
amortized over their estimated useful lives of 2-8 years. These
assets were acquired in the Eye Communication Systems, Inc. (“ECSI”) acquisition
on July 1, 2008, the OC-Net, Incorporated, (“OC-Net”) acquisition on January 26,
2007 and the Channel Blade Technologies (“Channel Blade”) acquisition on April
27, 2009, where the fair values were determined using the discounted cash flow
approach.
The
Company performs impairment tests annually or more frequently if facts and
circumstances warrant a review. The Company determined that there was a single
reporting unit for the purpose of goodwill impairment tests under SFAS
142. For purposes of assessing the impairment of goodwill, the
Company estimates the value of the reporting unit using the best evidence
available, which in fiscal 2009 and 2008 was a discounted cash flow model,
consideration of recent transaction values and market capitalization. This fair
value is then compared with the carrying value of the reporting unit. During
fiscal 2009 and 2008 there were no impairments to goodwill.
Intangible
assets with indefinite lives consisted of $5,439,000 and $2,196,000 of goodwill
at July 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively.
Amortizable
intangible asset costs, including customer relationships, trade names and
employee non-compete agreements, consisted of the following (in
thousands):
|
|
Customer
Relationships
|
|
|
Trade
Names
|
|
|
Non-Compete
Agreements
|
|
|
Finance
Costs
|
|
|
Total
|
|
Net
value 7/31/07
|
|
$ |
862 |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
1 |
|
|
$ |
863 |
|
Additions
|
|
|
730 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
730 |
|
Amortization
|
|
|
(196 |
) |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
(197 |
) |
Net
value 7/31/08
|
|
|
1,396 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
1,396 |
|
Additions
|
|
|
2,274 |
|
|
|
252 |
|
|
|
186 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
2,712 |
|
Amortization
|
|
|
(435 |
) |
|
|
(13 |
) |
|
|
(23 |
) |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(471 |
) |
Net
value 7/31/09
|
|
$ |
3,235 |
|
|
$ |
239 |
|
|
$ |
163 |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
3,637 |
|
The
estimated amortization expense related to intangible assets for the years
subsequent to July 31, 2009 is as follows (in thousands):
|
|
Year
Ending
July
31:
|
|
2010
|
|
$ |
810 |
|
2011
|
|
|
787 |
|
2012
|
|
|
602 |
|
2013
|
|
|
335 |
|
2014
|
|
|
322 |
|
2015
|
|
|
284 |
|
2016
|
|
|
284 |
|
2017
|
|
|
213 |
|
|
|
$ |
3,637 |
|
During
fiscal 2008 the Company reclassified $190,000 from amortizable intangible assets
to goodwill. The reclassification was related to the value assigned
to workforce intangible assets acquired in the OC–Net acquisition during fiscal
2007. It was determined during fiscal 2008 that the nature of the
workforce intangible assets capitalized required the assets to be presented with
goodwill as required by SFAS No. 141, “Business Combinations”. The
impact that this reclassification had on amortization expense was
immaterial. The fiscal 2008 financial statements have been restated
to conform to the fiscal 2009 presentation.
Accounting
Pronouncements
In April
2008, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position (“FSP”) FAS 142-3, “Determination of
the Useful Life of Intangible Assets” (“FSP FAS 142-3”). FSP FAS 142-3 amends
the factors that should be considered in developing renewal or extension
assumptions used to determine the useful life of a recognized intangible asset
under SFAS No. 142, “Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets” FSP FAS
142-3 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15,
2008. The adoption of FSP FAS 142-3 is not expected to have a
material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial position, results of
operations or cash flows.
In March
2008, the FASB issued SFAS No. 161, “Disclosures about Derivative Instruments
and Hedging Activities” (“SFAS 161”). SFAS 161 requires companies with
derivative instruments to disclose information that should enable financial
statement users to understand how and why a company uses derivative instruments,
how derivative instruments and related hedged items are accounted for under SFAS
No. 133 and how derivative instruments and related hedged items affect a
company’s financial position, financial performance and cash flows. SFAS 161 is
effective for the Company’s fiscal year beginning August 1, 2009. The adoption
of SFAS 161 is not expected to have a material impact on the Company’s
consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash
flows.
In
December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 160, “Non-controlling Interests in
Consolidated Financial Statements—an amendment of ARB No. 51” (“SFAS 160”). SFAS
160 amends ARB No. 51 to establish accounting and reporting standards for the
non-controlling interest in a subsidiary and for the deconsolidation of a
subsidiary. It clarifies that a non-controlling interest in a subsidiary is an
ownership interest in the consolidated entity that should be reported as equity
in the consolidated financial statements. It requires consolidated net income to
be reported at amounts that include the amounts attributable to both the parent
and the non-controlling interest. SFAS 160 establishes a single method of
accounting for changes in a parent’s ownership interest in a subsidiary that do
not result in deconsolidation. SFAS 160 is effective for the Company’s fiscal
year beginning August 1, 2009. The adoption of SFAS 160 is not expected to have
a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial position, results of
operations or cash flows.
In
December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 141 (Revised 2007), “Business
Combinations” (“SFAS 141(R)”). SFAS 141(R) retains the fundamental requirements
of the original pronouncement requiring that the purchase method be used for all
business combinations. SFAS 141(R) defines the acquirer as the entity that
obtains control of one or more businesses in the business combination,
establishes the acquisition date as the date that the acquirer achieves control
and requires the acquirer to recognize the assets acquired, liabilities assumed
and any non-controlling interest at their fair values as of the acquisition
date. In addition, SFAS 141(R) requires expensing of acquisition-related and
restructure-related costs, re-measurement of earn out provisions at fair value,
measurement of equity securities issued for purchase at the date of close of the
transaction and non-expensing of in-process research and development related
intangibles. SFAS 141(R) is effective for the Company’s business combinations
for which the acquisition date is on or after August 1, 2009. The
impact on the Company of the adoption of SFAS 141(R) cannot be determined at
this time but management expects that it may have a material impact on the
Company in the event of an acquisition or business combination.
The FASB
has issued FASB Statement No. 168, The “FASB Accounting Standards Codification”
and the Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles. Statement 168
establishes the FASB Accounting Standards Codification (Codification) as the
single source of authoritative U.S. generally accepted accounting principles
(U.S. GAAP) recognized by the FASB to be applied by nongovernmental entities.
Rules and interpretive releases of the SEC under authority of federal securities
laws are also sources of authoritative U.S. GAAP for SEC registrants. Statement
168 and the Codification are effective for financial statements issued for
interim and annual periods ending after September 15, 2009. When effective, the
Codification will supersede all existing non-SEC accounting and reporting
standards. All other non-grandfathered non-SEC accounting literature not
included in the Codification will become non-authoritative. Following Statement
168, the FASB will not issue new standards in the form of Statements, FASB Staff
Positions, or Emerging Issues Task Force Abstracts. Instead, the FASB will issue
Accounting Standards Updates, which will serve only to: (a) update the
Codification; (b) provide background information about the guidance; and (c)
provide the bases for conclusions on the change(s) in the Codification. The
adoption of Statement No. 168 is not expected to have a material impact on the
Company’s consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash
flows.
The FASB
has issued the following two standards which change the way entities account for
securitizations and special-purpose entities:
·
|
FASB
Statement No. 166, Accounting for Transfers of Financial Assets;
and
|
·
|
FASB
Statement No. 167, Amendments to FASB Interpretation No.
46(R)
|
FASB
Statement No. 166 is a revision to FASB Statement No. 140, Accounting for
Transfers and Servicing of Financial Assets and Extinguishments of Liabilities,
and will require more information about transfers of financial assets, including
securitization transactions, and where entities have continuing exposure to the
risks related to transferred financial assets. It eliminates the concept of a
“qualifying special-purpose entity,” changes the requirements for derecognizing
financial assets, and requires additional disclosures.
Statement
167 is a revision to FASB Interpretation No. 46 (Revised December 2003),
Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities, and changes how a reporting entity
determines when an entity that is insufficiently capitalized or is not
controlled through voting (or similar rights) should be consolidated. The
determination of whether a reporting entity is required to consolidate another
entity is based on, among other things, the other entity’s purpose and design
and the reporting entity’s ability to direct the activities of the other entity
that most significantly impact the other entity’s economic performance.
Statement 167 will require a reporting entity to provide additional disclosures
about its involvement with variable interest entities and any significant
changes in risk exposure due to that involvement. A reporting entity will be
required to disclose how its involvement with a variable interest entity affects
the reporting entity’s financial statements. Statement 166 enhances information
reported to users of financial statements by providing greater transparency
about transfers of financial assets and an entity’s continuing involvement in
transferred financial assets. Statements 166 and 167 will be effective at the
start of a reporting entity’s first fiscal year beginning after November 15,
2009, or January 1, 2010, for a calendar year-end entity. Early application is
not permitted. FASB Statement Nos. 166 and 167 are not expected to have a
material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial position, results of
operations or cash flows.
FASB
Accounting Standards Update 2009-14 changes the accounting model for revenue
arrangements that include both tangible products and software elements. Under
this guidance, tangible products containing software components and non-software
components that function together to deliver the tangible product's essential
functionality are excluded from the software revenue guidance in Subtopic
985-605, Software-Revenue Recognition. In addition, hardware components of a
tangible product containing software components are always excluded from the
software revenue guidance. FASB Accounting Standards Updates 2009-14 is
effective prospectively for revenue arrangements entered into or materially
modified in fiscal years beginning on or after June 15, 2010. Early adoption is
permitted. The Company does not expect this guidance to have a
material impact on its consolidated financial position, results of operations or
cash flows.
FASB
Accounting Standards Update 2009-13 addresses the accounting for
multiple-deliverable arrangements to enable vendors to account for products or
services (deliverables) separately rather than as a combined unit. Specifically,
this guidance amends the criteria in Subtopic 605-25, Revenue
Recognition-Multiple-Element Arrangements, for separating consideration in
multiple-deliverable arrangements. This guidance establishes a selling price
hierarchy for determining the selling price of a deliverable, which is based on:
(a) vendor-specific objective evidence; (b) third-party evidence; or (c)
estimates. This guidance also eliminates the residual method of allocation and
requires that arrangement consideration be allocated at the inception of the
arrangement to all deliverables using the relative selling price method. In
addition, this guidance significantly expands required disclosures related to a
vendor's multiple-deliverable revenue arrangements. FASB Accounting Standards
Update 2009-13 is effective prospectively for revenue arrangements entered into
or materially modified in fiscal years beginning on or after June 15, 2010.
Early adoption is permitted. The impact on the Company’s consolidated financial
position, results of operations or cash flows cannot be determined at this
time.
2.
|
Capitalized
and Purchased Software Product
Costs
|
The
balance of capitalized and purchased software product costs consisted of the
following (in thousands):
|
|
Software
Product Costs
|
|
|
Accumulated
Amortization
|
|
|
Net
Value
|
|
Balance
7/31/08
|
|
$ |
13,209 |
|
|
$ |
(11,613 |
) |
|
$ |
1,596 |
|
Capitalized
costs
|
|
|
759 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
759 |
|
Acquisitions
|
|
|
918 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
918 |
|
Amortization
expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(876 |
) |
|
|
(876 |
) |
Balance
7/31/09
|
|
$ |
14,886 |
|
|
$ |
(12,489 |
) |
|
$ |
2,397 |
|
The
estimated aggregate amortization expense for each of the five succeeding fiscal
years related to capitalized and purchased software product costs consist of the
following at July 31, 2009 (in thousands):
|
|
Year
Ending July 31:
|
|
2010
|
|
$ |
970 |
|
2011
|
|
|
689 |
|
2012
|
|
|
459 |
|
2013
|
|
|
257 |
|
2014
|
|
|
22 |
|
|
|
$ |
2,397 |
|
Notes
payable consist of the following at July 31 (in thousands):
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
Notes
payable
|
|
$ |
5,117 |
|
|
$ |
800 |
|
Less
imputed interest
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(8 |
) |
Notes
payable, net of imputed interest
|
|
|
5,117 |
|
|
|
792 |
|
Less
current maturities
|
|
|
117 |
|
|
|
676 |
|
Notes
payable - non-current
|
|
$ |
5,000 |
|
|
$ |
116 |
|
The
Company issued a $5,000,000 secured promissory note in connection with the April
27, 2009 purchase of Channel Blade. The Note is subordinated and
junior in right of payment to all indebtedness, obligations and liabilities of
the Company, existing as of April 27, 2009 or thereafter incurred, to current or
future Senior Lenders (as defined in the Note) of the Company. The
Company’s obligations under the Note are secured by a Subordinated Security
Agreement dated as of April 27, pursuant to which the Company granted to Channel
Blade a continuing junior security interest in substantially all of the assets
of the Company. The payments are subject to acceleration upon certain
events of default. The annual interest rate on the note is 10% for
the first year and 14% thereafter, unless the conditions of the covenant
described below are met. Accrued interest only is due quarterly
commencing July 31, 2009 through April 30, 2011. Twenty equal
quarterly payments of principal plus accrued interest shall then be due,
commencing July 31, 2011. The note contains a covenant that if the
Company pre-pays a minimum principal amount of $3,000,000 on or before April 27,
2010, the interest rate will remain 10% for the remainder of the note’s
term.
The
Company issued $700,000 of notes and $400,000 of future, non-interest bearing
contingent payments in connection with the OC-Net acquisition in 2007. The
interest rate on the notes is prime plus 2%, adjusted quarterly (effective rate
of 7.00% as of July 31, 2009). The notes are payable in quarterly principal
installments of $58,333, commencing March 31, 2007 through December 31, 2009.
The notes do not contain any financial covenants. The Company paid $250,000 of
the contingent payments in February, 2008, and the remaining $150,000, which
included $8,000 of imputed interest, was paid in January, 2009.
In 2008,
the Company issued $300,000 of notes payable in connection with the acquisition
of ECSI, of which $100,000 was paid on October 1, 2008 and $200,000 was paid on
July 1, 2009.
Principal
payments due on notes payable are as follows (in thousands):
|
|
Year
Ending July 31:
|
|
2010
|
|
$ |
117 |
|
2011
|
|
|
177 |
|
2012
|
|
|
771 |
|
2013
|
|
|
885 |
|
2014
|
|
|
1,016 |
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
2,151 |
|
|
|
$ |
5,117 |
|
On July
1, 2008, the Company acquired all of the assets related to electronic parts
catalog, electronic commerce and certification testing for service technicians
of Info Access, the micropublishing division of Eye Communication Systems, Inc.,
of Hartland, Wis. Consideration for the acquisition included
approximately $1.0 million in cash, 312,500 shares of the Company’s common stock
and notes payable of $300,000.
The
purchase price of this acquisition has been allocated to the following specific
assets and liabilities acquired based on the fair value of those identified
tangible and intangible assets and liabilities (in thousands):
Prepaid
expenses
|
|
$ |
9 |
|
Software
|
|
|
230 |
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
927 |
|
Other
intangible assets
|
|
|
730 |
|
Total
assets
|
|
|
1,896 |
|
Deferred
revenue
|
|
|
23 |
|
Capital
leases
|
|
|
6 |
|
Total
liabiities
|
|
|
29 |
|
Net
assets acquired
|
|
$ |
1,867 |
|
Capitalized
software is amortized over 2 years and intangibles related to customer
relationships are amortized over 4 years.
On April
16, 2009, AFIS, a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company, acquired a $149,000
bank note from Key Bank National Association for $125,000, which was secured by
substantially all of the assets of Powersports Outsourcing Group, LLC
(“PSOG”). The Company advanced an additional $36,000 to
PSOG. On April 17, 2009, AFIS acquired the assets of PSOG, valued at
approximately $85,000, in partial satisfaction of its debt to the Company of
approximately $185,000.
The
Company allocated the acquisition of the PSOG assets as follows:
Cash
|
|
$ |
37 |
|
Accounts
receivable
|
|
|
37 |
|
Other
assets
|
|
|
2 |
|
Notes
receivable
|
|
|
127 |
|
Total
assets
|
|
|
203 |
|
Accounts
payable
|
|
|
39 |
|
Payroll
related accruals
|
|
|
3 |
|
Total
liabiities
|
|
|
42 |
|
Net
assets acquired
|
|
$ |
161 |
|
Subsequent
to April 16, 2009, the Company deemed the fair value of the PSOG note receivable
to be $0 and recorded a valuation adjustment of approximately $127,000 in the
2009 results from operations.
PSOG,
located in Schenectady, NY, had been offering outsourced F&I services to
power sports, marine and RV customers in the Northeast U.S. since
1998. In connection with the acquisition, AFIS entered into a three
year employment agreement with Mark L. Taylor to serve as Director of F&I
Business Development. The Company included the results of operations of AFIS as
of April 17, 2009 in its consolidated financial statements for the year ended
July 31, 2009.
On April
27, 2009, the Company acquired substantially all of the assets of Channel Blade
Technologies, Corp., located in Virginia Beach, VA. The acquisition
makes the Company an industry leader with enhanced opportunities for growth.
Consideration for the acquisition included approximately $500,000 in cash,
615,385 shares of the Company’s common stock at a market price of $0.75 per
share, $765,000 of assumed net liabilities and a $5,000,000 note
payable. The Company incurred approximately $146,000 in capitalized
closing costs in connection with the Channel Blade acquisition.
The
purchase price of this acquisition has been allocated to the following specific
assets and liabilities acquired based on the fair value of those identified
tangible and intangible assets and liabilities as determined by an independent
valuation (in thousands):
Accounts
receivable
|
|
$ |
253 |
|
Prepaid
taxes
|
|
|
17 |
|
Equipment
|
|
|
613 |
|
Software
|
|
|
918 |
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
3,243 |
|
Other
intangible assets
|
|
|
2,712 |
|
Total
assets
|
|
|
7,756 |
|
Accounts
payable
|
|
|
242 |
|
Deferred
revenue
|
|
|
1,311 |
|
Accrued
payroll and related liabilities
|
|
|
95 |
|
Total
liabiities
|
|
|
1,648 |
|
Net
assets acquired
|
|
$ |
6,108 |
|
Intangibles
and other assets include trade names, customer relationships and employee
non-compete agreements which are amortized over 5, 8 and 2 years,
respectively. Capitalized software product costs are amortized over
4.1 years.
In
connection with the acquisition, the Company entered into one year non-compete
employment agreements with Jon M. Lintvet and Charles Lewis to serve as Director
of New Business Development and Director of Strategic Accounts- Marine and RV,
respectively.
The
following table shows the unaudited pro forma results of operations for the
fiscal years ended July 31, 2009 and 2008, which assumes the Channel Blade
acquisition occurred at the beginning of those periods (in thousands, except per
share data):
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
Revenues
|
|
$ |
21,075 |
|
|
$ |
21,443 |
|
Cost
of revenues
|
|
|
4,096 |
|
|
|
4,008 |
|
Gross
profit
|
|
|
16,979 |
|
|
|
17,435 |
|
Net
operating expenses
|
|
|
17,245 |
|
|
|
19,129 |
|
Operating
loss
|
|
|
(266 |
) |
|
|
(1,694 |
) |
Interest
expense
|
|
|
739 |
|
|
|
599 |
|
Other
expense (income), net
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
(70 |
) |
Loss
before provision for income taxes
|
|
|
(1,011 |
) |
|
|
(2,223 |
) |
Income
tax provision (benefit)
|
|
|
123 |
|
|
|
(590 |
) |
Net
loss
|
|
$ |
(1,134 |
) |
|
$ |
(1,633 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
common shares outstanding:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
7,780 |
|
|
|
7,293 |
|
Diluted
|
|
|
7,780 |
|
|
|
7,293 |
|
Basic
and diluted net loss per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$ |
(0.15 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.22 |
) |
Diluted
|
|
$ |
(0.15 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.22 |
) |
This pro
forma information does not purport to be indicative of the results that actually
would have been obtained if the combined operations had been conducted during
the periods presented and is not intended to be a projection of future
results.
5.
|
Capital
and Operating Leases
|
The
Company leases office space and certain office equipment under operating lease
arrangements expiring through 2021. The Company is generally liable for its
share of increases in the landlord’s direct operating expenses and real estate
taxes related to the office space leases. Total rental expense for the operating
leases was $554,000 in 2009 and $659,000 in 2008. An additional
131,000 of rent costs were incurred in fiscal 2009 but were accrued in fiscal
2008 related to the restructure.
Where
applicable, rent expense for leased offices is recognized on a straight-line
basis over the lease terms, which differ from the pattern of payments required
by the leases. Other accrued liabilities included $0 and $48,000 of deferred
rent at July 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively. As more fully discussed
in Note 12, the Company has a recorded liability totaling $93,000 for estimated
net future lease costs associated with closed offices as of July 31,
2009.
The
Company leases approximately 16,300 square feet of office space located at 10850
West Park Place, Milwaukee, Wisconsin 53224. Commencement occurred on
July 17, 2009 and runs twelve years until July 17, 2021. Over the
twelve year lease agreement, annual base rent of $149,000 increases
approximately 2.9% per year. Rent abatement was negotiated for the
first fifteen months, and will save the Company approximately
$187,000. Annual projected operating costs and taxes, which are
subject to change, are currently $8.90 per square foot.
The
Company has certain capital lease agreements in place related to computer and
office equipment. Minimum lease payments under remaining capital and
operating leases are as follows (in thousands):
Fiscal
Year Ending July 31
|
|
Capital
Leases
|
|
|
Operating
Leases
|
|
2010
|
|
$ |
127 |
|
|
$ |
412 |
|
2011
|
|
|
94 |
|
|
|
468 |
|
2012
|
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
322 |
|
2013
|
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
310 |
|
2014
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
312 |
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
2,336 |
|
Total
minimum lease payments
|
|
|
253 |
|
|
|
4,160 |
|
Less
amounts related to interest
|
|
|
29 |
|
|
|
- |
|
Net
minimum lease payments
|
|
$ |
224 |
|
|
$ |
4,160 |
|
On July
9, 2004, the Company entered into a line of credit agreement with JPMorgan
Chase, N.A. which, as amended, permits the Company to borrow an amount equal to
80% of the book value of all eligible accounts receivable plus 45% of the value
of all eligible open renewal orders (provided the renewal rate is at least 85%)
minus $75,000, up to $1,500,000. Eligible accounts include certain
non-foreign accounts receivable which are outstanding for fewer than 90 days
from the invoice date. The note bears interest at 1% per annum above
the prime rate (plus an additional 3%, at the lender’s option, upon the
occurrence of any default under the note) plus a non-usage fee of 0.25% per
annum on any unused portion of the line of credit. The interest rate on the
outstanding principal at July 31, 2009 is 4.25%. The line of credit terminates
June 30, 2011 and is secured by substantially all of the Company’s
assets. The line of credit limits repurchases of common stock, the
payment of dividends, liens on assets and new indebtedness. It also
contains a financial covenant requiring the Company to maintain a minimum debt
service coverage ratio of 1.2 to 1.0, with which the Company was in compliance
at July 31, 2009. The Company had $500,000 and $700,000 principal
outstanding on the line of credit at July 31, 2009, and July 31, 2008,
respectively.
On August
7, 2003, the Company adopted a Shareholder Rights Plan designed to protect the
interests of common shareholders from an inadequate or unfair takeover, but not
affect a takeover proposal which the Board of Directors believes is fair to all
shareholders. Under the Shareholder Rights Plan adopted by the Board
of Directors, all shareholders of record on August 18, 2003 received one
Preferred Share Purchase Right for each share of common stock they
owned. These Rights trade in tandem with the common stock until and
unless they are triggered. Should a person or group acquire more than
10% of ARI’s common stock (or if an existing holder of 10% or more of the common
stock were to increase its position by more than 1%), the Rights would become
exercisable for every shareholder except the acquirer that triggered the
exercise. The Rights, if triggered, would give the rest of the shareholders the
ability to purchase additional stock of ARI at a substantial
discount. The rights will expire on August 18, 2013, and can be
redeemed by the Company for $0.01 per Right at any time prior to a person or
group becoming a 10% shareholder.
8.
|
Stock-based
Compensation Plans
|
Total
stock compensation expense recognized by the Company for the years ended July
31, 2009 and 2008 was approximately $315,000 and $306,000,
respectively. As of July 31, 2009 and 2008, there was approximately
$224,000 and $481,000, respectively, of total unrecognized compensation cost
related to non-vested options granted under the plans.
The
Company used the Black-Scholes model to value stock options granted. Expected
volatility is based on historical volatility of the Company’s stock. The
expected life of options granted represents the period of time that options
granted are expected to be outstanding based on the terms of the grant. The
risk-free rate for periods within the contractual term of the options is based
on the U.S. Treasury yields in effect at the time of grant. As stock-based
compensation expense recognized in our results of operations is based on awards
ultimately expected to vest, the amount has been reduced for estimated
forfeitures. SFAS 123R requires forfeitures to be estimated at the time of grant
and revised, if necessary, in subsequent periods if actual forfeitures differ
from those estimates. Forfeitures were estimated based on our historical
experience.
The
weighted average assumptions in the following table were used to estimate the
fair value of options granted:
|
|
Year
ended July 31
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
Expected
life (years)
|
|
10
years
|
|
|
10
years
|
|
Risk-free
interest rate
|
|
|
3.8 |
% |
|
|
4.5 |
% |
Expected
volatility
|
|
|
84.4 |
% |
|
|
78.0 |
% |
Expected
forfeiture rate
|
|
|
16.3 |
% |
|
|
20.9 |
% |
Expected
dividend yield
|
|
|
0.0 |
% |
|
|
0.0 |
% |
Employee
Stock Purchase Plans
The
Company’s 2000 Employee Stock Purchase Plan has 175,000 shares of common stock
reserved for issuance, and 158,681 of the shares have been issued as of July 31,
2009. All employees of the Company, other than executive officers,
with nine months of service are eligible to participate. Shares may be purchased
at the end of a specified period at the lower of 85% of the market value at the
beginning or end of the specified period through accumulation of payroll
deductions, not to exceed 5,000 shares per employee per year.
1991
Stock Option Plan
The
Company’s 1991 Stock Option Plan was terminated on August 14, 2001, except as to
outstanding options. Options granted under the 1991 Plan may be either: (a)
options intended to qualify as incentive stock options under Section 422 of the
Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the Code), or (b) nonqualified stock
options. Any incentive stock option that was granted under the 1991 Plan could
not be granted at a price less than the fair market value of the stock on the
date of grant (or less than 110% of the fair market value in the case of holders
of 10% or more of the voting stock of the Company). Nonqualified stock options
were allowed to be granted at the exercise price established by the Compensation
Committee, which could be less than, equal to or greater than the fair market
value of the stock on the date of grant.
Each
option granted under the 1991 Plan is exercisable for a period of ten years from
the date of grant (five years in the case of a holder of more than 10% of the
voting stock of the Company) or such shorter period as determined by the
Compensation Committee and shall lapse upon the expiration of said period, or
earlier upon termination of the participant’s employment with the
Company.
At its
discretion, the Compensation Committee may require a participant to be employed
by the Company for a designated number of years prior to exercising any options.
The Committee may also require a participant to meet certain performance
criteria, or that the Company meets certain targets or goals, prior to
exercising any options.
Changes
in option shares under the 1991 Plan are as follows:
|
|
Number
of Options
|
|
|
Wtd.
Avg. Exercise Price
|
|
|
Wtd.
Avg. Remaining Contractual Period (Years)
|
|
|
Aggregate
Instrinsic Value
|
|
Outstanding
7/31/07
|
|
|
125,686 |
|
|
$ |
2.31 |
|
|
|
1.89 |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
Granted
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
n/a |
|
|
|
n/a |
|
|
|
n/a |
|
Exercised
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
n/a |
|
|
|
n/a |
|
|
|
n/a |
|
Forfeited
|
|
|
(32,500 |
) |
|
|
2.28 |
|
|
|
n/a |
|
|
|
n/a |
|
Outstanding
and exercisable at 7/31/08
|
|
|
93,186 |
|
|
|
2.27 |
|
|
|
1.23 |
|
|
|
- |
|
Granted
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
n/a |
|
|
|
n/a |
|
|
|
n/a |
|
Exercised
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
n/a |
|
|
|
n/a |
|
|
|
n/a |
|
Forfeited
|
|
|
(57,686 |
) |
|
|
2.18 |
|
|
|
n/a |
|
|
|
n/a |
|
Outstanding
and exercisable at 7/31/09
|
|
|
35,500 |
|
|
$ |
2.43 |
|
|
|
1.09 |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
The range
of exercise prices for options outstanding at July 31, 2009 and 2008 was $2.06
to $9.06.
1993
Director Stock Option Plan
The
Company’s 1993 Director Stock Option Plan (“Director Plan”) has expired and is
terminated except for outstanding options. The Director Plan originally had
150,000 shares of common stock reserved for issuance to non-employee directors.
Options under the Director Plan were granted at the fair market value of the
stock on the grant date. Each option granted under the Director Plan is
exercisable one year after the date of grant and cannot be exercised later than
ten years from the date of grant.
Changes
in option shares under the Director Plan are as follows:
|
|
Number
of Options
|
|
|
Wtd.
Avg. Exercise Price
|
|
|
Wtd.
Avg. Remaining Contractual Period (Years)
|
|
|
Aggregate
Instrinsic Value
|
|
Outstanding
7/31/07
|
|
|
1,313 |
|
|
$ |
2.65 |
|
|
|
2.97 |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
Granted
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
n/a |
|
|
|
n/a |
|
|
|
n/a |
|
Exercised
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
n/a |
|
|
|
n/a |
|
|
|
n/a |
|
Forfeited
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
n/a |
|
|
|
n/a |
|
|
|
n/a |
|
Outstanding
and exercisable at 7/31/08
|
|
|
1,313 |
|
|
|
2.65 |
|
|
|
1.97 |
|
|
|
- |
|
Granted
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
n/a |
|
|
|
n/a |
|
|
|
n/a |
|
Exercised
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
n/a |
|
|
|
n/a |
|
|
|
n/a |
|
Forfeited
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
n/a |
|
|
|
n/a |
|
|
|
n/a |
|
Outstanding
and exercisable at 7/31/09
|
|
|
1,313 |
|
|
$ |
2.65 |
|
|
|
0.97 |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
The range
of exercise prices for options outstanding at July 31, 2009 and 2008 was $2.00
to $3.56.
2000
Stock Option Plan
The
Company’s 2000 Stock Option Plan (“2000 Plan”) has 1,950,000 shares of common
stock authorized for issuance. Options granted under the 2000 Plan may be
either: (a) options intended to qualify as incentive stock options under Section
422 of the Code, or (b) nonqualified stock options.
Any
incentive stock option that is granted under the 2000 Plan may not be granted at
a price less than the fair market value of the stock on the date of the grant
(or less than 110% of the fair market value in the case of a participant who is
a 10% shareholder of the Company within the meaning of Section 422 of the Code).
Nonqualified stock options may be granted at the exercise price established by
the Compensation Committee.
Each
incentive stock option granted under the 2000 Plan is exercisable for a period
of not more than ten years from the date of grant (five years in the case of a
participant who is 10% shareholder of the Company). Nonqualified stock options
do not have this restriction.
Eligible
participants include current and prospective employees, non-employee directors,
consultants or other persons who provide services to the Company and whose
performance, in the judgment of the Compensation Committee or management of the
Company, can have a significant effect on the success of the Company. Changes in
option shares under the 2000 Plan are as follows:
|
|
Number
of Options
|
|
|
Wtd.
Avg. Exercise Price
|
|
|
Wtd.
Avg. Remaining Contractual Period(Years)
|
|
|
Aggregate
Instrinsic Value
|
|
Outstanding
7/31/07
|
|
|
1,013,100 |
|
|
$ |
1.45 |
|
|
|
6.61 |
|
|
$ |
320,062 |
|
Granted
|
|
|
548,625 |
|
|
|
1.51 |
|
|
|
n/a |
|
|
|
n/a |
|
Exercised
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
n/a |
|
|
|
n/a |
|
|
|
n/a |
|
Forfeited
|
|
|
(181,187 |
) |
|
|
1.18 |
|
|
|
n/a |
|
|
|
n/a |
|
Outstanding
at 7/31/08
|
|
|
1,380,538 |
|
|
|
1.51 |
|
|
|
7.36 |
|
|
|
150,967 |
|
Exercisable
at 7/31/08
|
|
|
937,203 |
|
|
|
1.48 |
|
|
|
6.28 |
|
|
|
150,967 |
|
Granted
|
|
|
150,250 |
|
|
|
1.06 |
|
|
|
n/a |
|
|
|
n/a |
|
Exercised
|
|
|
(60,242 |
) |
|
|
0.26 |
|
|
|
n/a |
|
|
|
n/a |
|
Forfeited
|
|
|
(257,144 |
) |
|
|
1.52 |
|
|
|
n/a |
|
|
|
n/a |
|
Outstanding
at 7/31/09
|
|
|
1,213,402 |
|
|
|
1.51 |
|
|
|
7.08 |
|
|
|
21,337 |
|
Exercisable
at 7/31/09
|
|
|
871,626 |
|
|
$ |
1.55 |
|
|
|
6.35 |
|
|
$ |
21,328 |
|
The range
of exercise prices for options outstanding at July 31, 2009 and 2008 was $0.15
to $2.74.
Changes
in non-vested option shares under the 2000 Plan are as follows:
|
|
Number
of Options
|
|
|
Wtd.
Avg. Grant Date Fair Value
|
|
Non-vested
at 7/31/07
|
|
|
137,675 |
|
|
$ |
1.79 |
|
Granted
|
|
|
548,625 |
|
|
|
1.51 |
|
Vested
|
|
|
(226,249 |
) |
|
|
1.54 |
|
Forfeited
|
|
|
(16,716 |
) |
|
|
2.06 |
|
Non-vested
at 7/31/08
|
|
|
443,335 |
|
|
|
1.76 |
|
Granted
|
|
|
150,250 |
|
|
|
1.06 |
|
Vested
|
|
|
(195,622 |
) |
|
|
1.47 |
|
Forfeited
|
|
|
(56,187 |
) |
|
|
1.54 |
|
Non-vested
at 7/31/09
|
|
|
341,776 |
|
|
$ |
1.40 |
|
The
provision for income taxes is composed of the following (in
thousands):
|
|
Year
ended July 31
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
Current:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal
|
|
$ |
475 |
|
|
$ |
362 |
|
State
|
|
|
56 |
|
|
|
121 |
|
Utilization
of net operating loss carryforwards
|
|
|
(502 |
) |
|
|
(425 |
) |
AMT
and other
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
- |
|
Deferred,
net
|
|
|
87 |
|
|
|
(648 |
) |
Income
tax (benefit) provision
|
|
$ |
123 |
|
|
$ |
(590 |
) |
Provision
for income taxes is based on taxes payable under currently enacted tax laws and
an analysis of temporary differences between the book and tax bases of our
assets and liabilities, including various accruals, allowances, depreciation and
amortization. The tax effect of these temporary differences and the estimated
tax benefit from tax net operating losses are reported as deferred tax assets
and liabilities in the balance sheet. An assessment of the likelihood
that net deferred tax assets will be realized from future taxable income is
performed. To the extent that management believes it is more likely than not
that some portion, or all, of the deferred tax asset will not be realized, a
valuation allowance is established. This assessment is based on all
available evidence, both positive and negative, in evaluating the likelihood of
realizability. Issues considered in the assessment include future
reversals of existing taxable temporary differences, estimates of future taxable
income (exclusive of reversing temporary differences and carryforwards) and
prudent tax planning strategies available in future periods. Because
ultimately the realizability of deferred tax assets is highly subject to the
outcome of future events, the amount established as valuation allowances is
considered to be a significant estimate that is subject to change in the near
term. To the extent a valuation allowance is established or there is
a change in the allowance during a period, the change is reflected with a
corresponding increase or decrease in the tax provision in the statement of
operations.
The
Company had a change in its estimated valuation allowance primarily due to a
change in its projections of taxable income for the next twelve
quarters. The Company continues to evaluate the realizability of
deferred tax assets on a quarterly basis.
Significant
components of the Company’s deferred tax liabilities and assets as of July 31
are as follows (in thousands):
|
|
Year
ended July 31
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
Deferred
tax assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
operating loss carryforwards
|
|
$ |
8,235 |
|
|
$ |
10,615 |
|
Alternative
minimum tax credit carryforwards
|
|
|
96 |
|
|
|
78 |
|
Deferred
revenue
|
|
|
2,032 |
|
|
|
1,832 |
|
Software
product costs
|
|
|
378 |
|
|
|
- |
|
Intangible
assets
|
|
|
81 |
|
|
|
- |
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
430 |
|
Other
|
|
|
837 |
|
|
|
1,273 |
|
Total
deferred tax assets
|
|
|
11,659 |
|
|
|
14,228 |
|
Valuation
allowance for deferred tax assets
|
|
|
(8,747 |
) |
|
|
(10,618 |
) |
Net
deferred tax assets
|
|
|
2,912 |
|
|
|
3,610 |
|
Deferred
tax liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Software
product costs and other
|
|
|
(208 |
) |
|
|
(580 |
) |
Intangible
assets
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(288 |
) |
Goodwill
|
|
|
(50 |
) |
|
|
- |
|
Net
deferred taxes
|
|
$ |
2,654 |
|
|
$ |
2,742 |
|
As of
July 31, 2009, the Company has unused net operating loss carryforwards for
federal income tax purposes of $21,355,000 expiring in 2010 through
2020.
A portion
of these unused net operating loss carryforwards for federal income tax purposes
totaling $2,038,000 expire between 2012 and 2014 and are limited to $116,000
annually that can be utilized to offset taxable income. Use of these net
operating loss carryforwards is restricted under Section 382 of the Code because
of changes in ownership in 1997.
In
addition, the Company has net operating loss carryforwards for state income tax
purposes totaling approximately $16,230,000 expiring in 2010 through
2015.
A
reconciliation between income tax expense and income taxes computed by applying
the statutory federal income tax rate of 34% and the state rate of approximately
6% to U.S. based income before income taxes is as follows (in
thousands):
|
|
Year
ended July 31
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
Computed
income taxes at 40%
|
|
$ |
219 |
|
|
$ |
296 |
|
Permanent
items
|
|
|
93 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
Deferred
tax valuation and effective rate adjustments
|
|
|
(189 |
) |
|
|
(890 |
) |
Income
tax expense (benefit)
|
|
$ |
123 |
|
|
$ |
(590 |
) |
During
2009 and 2008, $6,047,000 and $6,422,000 respectively, of federal net operating
loss carryforwards expired. These expired net operating loss
carryforwards have been included in the calculation of the change in valuation
allowance.
The
Company adopted the provisions of FASB Interpretation No. 48, "Accounting for
Uncertainty in Income Taxes - an interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109" (FIN
48), on August 1, 2007. The implementation of FIN 48 did not have a significant
impact on our results of operations or financial position and therefore no
amounts were reserved for uncertain tax positions as of July 31, 2009 and
2008. If necessary, in the future, the Company will accrue and
recognize interest and penalties related to uncertain tax positions as a
component of income tax expense.
10.
|
Employee
Benefit Plan
|
The
Company has a qualified retirement savings plan (the 401(k) Plan) covering its
employees. Each employee may elect to reduce his or her current compensation by
up to 50%, up to a maximum of $16,500 ($22,000 over age 50) in calendar 2009
(subject to adjustment in future years to reflect cost of living increases) and
have the amount of the reduction contributed to the 401(k) Plan. Company
contributions to the 401(k) Plan are at the discretion of the Board of
Directors. During 2009 and 2008, the Company issued 32,955 and 24,059 shares of
common stock, respectively, as a discretionary contribution to the 401(k) Plan.
The amounts charged to expense for the 401(k) contributions, net of forfeitures,
were $45,000 during 2009 and $38,000 during 2008.
11.
|
Changes
in Accounting Estimates
|
During
fiscal 2009 and 2008, the Company had a change in its estimated valuation
allowance related to deferred tax assets due to continual revisions and
evaluations of the estimates of the expected results of operations for the next
thirty six months. The difference between the amounts previously
recorded as a valuation allowance and the amount currently recorded was charged
to income tax expense. The amount of this change in accounting
estimate was expense of $88,000 or $0.01 per basic and diluted common share in
fiscal 2009 and income of approximately $648,000 or $0.09 per basic and diluted
common share in fiscal 2008.
In July
2008 the Company announced a restructuring that consolidated its data conversion
operations in Virginia into its Wisconsin location and consolidated the software
development operations in Colorado into its California
location. Adjustments to the restructuring reserve were charged to
operating expense during fiscal 2009. The following represents
changes to the restructuring reserve (in thousands):
|
|
Balance
7/31/08
|
|
|
Payments
|
|
|
Adjustments
|
|
|
Balance
7/31/09
|
|
Severance
and related benefits
|
|
$ |
292 |
|
|
$ |
(292 |
) |
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
Net
future lease costs
|
|
|
204 |
|
|
|
(111 |
) |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
93 |
|
Equipment
disposition and other
|
|
|
33 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(33 |
) |
|
|
- |
|
Total
restructuring costs
|
|
$ |
529 |
|
|
$ |
(403 |
) |
|
$ |
(33 |
) |
|
$ |
93 |
|
In
accordance with SFAS No. 131, “Disclosures about Segments of an Enterprise and
Related Information”, we have segregated the Netherlands operation and the U.S.
operations into separate reportable segments. (Refer to Note 1, “Significant
Accounting Policies”, for a description of segment
operations.) Segment revenue for the Netherlands operation includes
only revenue generated out of the Netherland subsidiary and does not include
rest of world revenue sold by the U.S. operation. We evaluate the performance of
and allocate resources to each of the segments based on their operating results
excluding interest and taxes. The accounting policies for each of the segments
are described in Note 1. Information concerning our operating
business segments for fiscal 2009 and 2008 is as follows (in
thousands):
|
|
Year
Ended July 31
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
Revenue
:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Netherlands
|
|
$ |
652 |
|
|
$ |
763 |
|
United
States
|
|
|
16,985 |
|
|
|
16,154 |
|
Consolidated
|
|
$ |
17,637 |
|
|
$ |
16,917 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
income (loss)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Netherlands
|
|
$ |
(100 |
) |
|
$ |
(262 |
) |
United
States
|
|
|
524 |
|
|
|
1,645 |
|
Consolidated
|
|
$ |
424 |
|
|
$ |
1,383 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Netherlands
|
|
$ |
227 |
|
|
$ |
272 |
|
United
States
|
|
|
18,380 |
|
|
|
10,887 |
|
Consolidated
|
|
$ |
18,607 |
|
|
$ |
12,193 |
|
14.
|
Concentration and Related
Party
|
Briggs
& Stratton Corporation (“Briggs”) is one of the Company’s customers and owns
approximately 11% of the Company’s stock. Briggs has entered into
customer contracts with the Company and has provided vendor services to the
Company in the ordinary course of business. Generally, the customer
contracts are for one or two years and renew annually thereafter unless either
party elects otherwise. The Company invoiced Briggs approximately
$416,000 and $418,000 for products and services provided during fiscal 2009 and
fiscal 2008, respectively. Briggs had unpaid net trade receivables of
$201,000 or 15% and $212,000 or 17% of total trade receivables outstanding as of
July 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively, $0 of which was over 90 days at July 31,
2009 and 2008.
The
vendor services provided by Briggs are for printing of materials which are
generally resold to customers and included in cost of sales. Briggs
invoiced the Company approximately $105,000 and $156,000 for printing services
during fiscal 2009 and fiscal 2008, respectively, $2,000 and $8,000 of which
were unpaid as of July 31, 2009 and 2008.
Gordon J.
Bridge serves on the Company’s board of directors. He was assigned by
the board lead Director for F&I Services, LLC, a subsidiary of the Company,
for which the Company has accrued but unpaid expenses of $17,050 at July 31,
2009.
On June
23, 2008, Powersports Complete, LLC (“Powersports”) filed a complaint in the
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin against the Company
and its wholly-owned subsidiary, AFIS. The complaint claimed, among
other things, that the Company and AFIS owe $56,960 to Powersports in connection
with their business arrangements during 2007. The complaint also
claimed that Powersports, among other remedies, is entitled to compensatory
damages in the amount of $1,250,000 and punitive damages in the amount of
$2,500,000. The Company and AFIS filed their answer to the complaint
on September 16, 2008. The answer denied that Powersports is entitled
to the payments described above, and asserted numerous counterclaims against
Powersports. On February 4, 2009, the parties agreed to settle all
outstanding claims between them. The settlement had no material
effect on the Company’s financial statements.
The
Company evaluated events or transactions that may have occurred after the
balance sheet date for potential recognition or disclosure in the financial
statements according to the guidance of FASB Statement No. 165, "Subsequent
Events", and determined that there were no events that occurred after July 31,
2009, but prior to October 29, 2009 that would affect the financial statements
for the period ending July 31, 2009.
51