UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

Form 10-Q

(Mark One)

ý

QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)
OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended January 31, 2006

OR

o

TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)
OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from           to           

Commission file number 1-7427

Veritas DGC Inc.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

(832) 351-8300

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.  Yes ý  No o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer.  See definition of “accelerated filer and large accelerated filer” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).  Yes o  No ý

The number of shares of the Company’s common stock, $.01 par value, outstanding at February 28, 2006 was 35,558,617 (including 89,828 Veritas Energy Services Inc. exchangeable shares which are identical to the company’s common stock in all material respects).

TABLE OF CONTENTS

FORM 10-Q

PART I.  FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1.           Financial Statements

VERITAS DGC INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS AND
COMPREHENSIVE INCOME

(Unaudited)

See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

1

VERITAS DGC INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(Dollars in thousands, except par value)

See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

2

VERITAS DGC INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(Unaudited)

See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

3

VERITAS DGC INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

1.              Summary of significant accounting policies

Basis of presentation

These consolidated financial statements are unaudited, but in the opinion of management, contain all appropriate adjustments, all of which are normally recurring adjustments unless otherwise disclosed.  These financial statements, including selected notes, have been prepared in accordance with the applicable rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission and do not include all of the information and disclosures required by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America for complete financial statements.  Certain reclassifications have been made to the prior period amounts to conform to the current period classification.  These interim financial statements should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements presented in the Veritas DGC Inc. Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended July 31, 2005.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

In December 2004, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued FASB Staff Position (“FSP”) No. 109-1, “Application of FASB Statement No. 109, Accounting for Income Taxes, to the Tax Deduction on Qualified Production Activities Provided by the American Jobs Creation Act of 2004,” which provides guidance on the recently enacted American Jobs Creation Act of 2004 (the “Act”). The Act provides a U.S. tax deduction for income from qualified domestic production activities. FSP 109-1 provides for the treatment of the deduction as a special deduction as described in SFAS No. 109. Accordingly, we will record the amount of any special deductions in the years they are taken.

In December 2004, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position No. 109-2, “Accounting and Disclosure Guidance for the Foreign Repatriation Provision within the American Jobs Creation Act of 2004,” which provides guidance under SFAS No. 109 with respect to recording the potential impact of the repatriation provisions of the Act on a company’s income tax expense and deferred tax liability. FSP 109-2 states that a company is allowed time beyond the financial reporting period of enactment to evaluate the effect of the Act on its plan for reinvestment or repatriation of foreign earnings for purposes of applying SFAS No. 109. The company has not yet decided on whether, and to what extent, we might elect to repatriate foreign earnings under the provisions in the Act. Any such repatriation under the Act must occur by July 31, 2006. Accordingly, Veritas’ consolidated financial statements do not reflect a provision for taxes related to this election.

In December 2004, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 153, “Exchanges of Nonmonetary Assets — an amendment of APB Opinion No. 29,” to address the measurement of exchanges of nonmonetary assets.  SFAS No. 153 eliminates the exception from fair value measurement for nonmonetary exchanges of similar productive assets and replaces it with a general exception for exchanges of nonmonetary assets that do not have commercial substance.  A nonmonetary exchange has commercial substance if the future cash flows of the entity are expected to change significantly as a result of the exchange.  This statement was adopted by the company beginning August 1, 2005.  The adoption of this statement had no impact on the company’s financial statements and is not expected to have a material impact on future financial statements.

In May 2005, the FASB issued SFAS No. 154, “Accounting Changes and Error Corrections—a replacement of APB Opinion No. 20 and FASB Statement No. 3.” SFAS No. 154 requires retrospective application to prior periods’ financial statements for changes in accounting principle, unless it is impracticable to determine either the period-specific effects or the cumulative effect of the change. SFAS 154 also requires that a change in depreciation, amortization, or depletion method for long-lived, non-financial assets be accounted for as a change in accounting estimate effected by a change in accounting principle. SFAS 154 is effective for accounting changes and corrections of errors made in fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2005. The implementation of SFAS No. 154 is not expected to have a material impact on the company’s financial statements.

4

In February 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 155, “Accounting for Certain Hybrid Financial Instruments – an amendment of FASB Statements No. 133 and 150.”  SFAS No. 155 (a) permits fair value remeasurement for any hybrid financial instrument that contains an embedded derivative that otherwise would require bifurcation, (b) clarifies that certain instruments are not subject to the requirements of SFAS 133, (c) establishes a requirement to evaluate interests in securitized financial assets to identify interests that may contain an embedded derivative requiring bifurcation, (d) clarifies what may be an embedded derivative for certain concentrations of credit risk and (e) amends SFAS 140 to eliminate certain prohibitions related to derivatives on a qualifying special-purpose entity.  SFAS 155 is effective for us for the fiscal year beginning August 1, 2007.  We are currently evaluating the impact that SFAS 155 may have on the company’s financial statements.

2.              Earnings per common share

Basic and diluted earnings per common share are computed as follows:

The shares issuable from assumed conversion of notes for both the three and six months ended January 31, 2006 are based upon a stock price of $45.06, which was the closing price of Veritas DGC’s common stock at January 31, 2006.

The following options to purchase common shares have been excluded from the computation assuming dilution because the exercise prices of the options exceeded the average market price for the period of the underlying common shares.

5

3.              Gain on involuntary conversion of assets

In January 2005, our seismic vessel Veritas Viking experienced an engine failure while acquiring data in the Gulf of Mexico and lost substantial amounts of overboard seismic equipment. This seismic equipment was insured at its replacement cost. As a result, insurance settlements for reimbursement of certain costs and to acquire replacement equipment in excess of the book value of the equipment lost less our deductible were recorded as a gain of $9.9 million during the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2005.  An additional $2.0 million gain was recorded in the first quarter of fiscal 2006 due to the timing of the insurance settlements, which are substantially complete.  The $2.0 million gain has been included as a change in accounts receivable in the consolidated statement of cash flows.

4.              Notes payable and debt structure

As of January 31, 2006, our notes payable consisted of $155.0 million of Convertible Senior Notes due 2024. These notes are classified as a current liability as of January 31, 2006 because the conversion feature discussed below results in the notes being convertible at the option of the holders.

The Convertible Senior Notes bear interest at a per annum rate which equals the three-month LIBOR rate, adjusted quarterly, minus a spread of 0.75%.  The interest rate of the notes, from December 15, 2005 through March 14, 2006, is 3.74%, based on a LIBOR rate of 4.49%.  For the second quarter of fiscal 2006, the weighted average interest rate on the notes was 3.44%. The notes will mature on March 15, 2024 and may not be redeemed by us prior to March 20, 2009. Holders of the notes may require us to repurchase some, or all, of the notes on March 15, 2009, 2014 and 2019. They could also require repurchase upon a change of control (as defined in the indenture under which the Convertible Senior Notes were issued).

Under certain circumstances and at the option of the holder, the Convertible Senior Notes are convertible prior to the maturity date into cash and shares of our common stock.  Certain of these circumstances may result in classification of the Convertible Senior Notes as current on our balance sheet.  These circumstances include:

1.                                       the closing sale price of our common stock is over 120% of the conversion price, which is currently $24.03 (with 120% being $28.84) for 20 trading days in the period of 30 consecutive trading days ending on the last trading day of the fiscal quarter preceding the quarter in which the conversion occurs;

2.                                       if we called the notes for redemption and the redemption has not occurred;

3.                                       the occurrence of a five consecutive trading day period in which the trading price of the notes was less than 95% of the closing sale price of our common stock on such day multiplied by the conversion ratio; or

4.                                       the occurrence of specified corporate transactions.

Should any of these circumstances occur, the Convertible Senior Notes would be convertible at the then current stock price times the conversion ratio of 41.6146. This amount would be payable in cash equal to the principal amount of the notes, the par value adjusted for dividends or other equity transactions, and the additional amount payable in shares of our common stock.  Currently, the maximum amount payable by us on conversion is $155 million in cash plus approximately 6.5 million shares. This settlement method is prescribed in the indenture and is not at the discretion of any party.  The shares issuable from such conversion are considered in the calculation of diluted earnings per share.

As of the beginning of the second fiscal quarter of 2006, the Convertible Senior Notes were convertible as the stock price remained greater than 120% of the Conversion Price for at least 20 trading days in the period of 30 consecutive trading days ending on October 31, 2005.  The notes continued to be convertible as of January 31, 2006.  Because of the convertibility, the notes have been classified as a current liability on our consolidated balance sheet as of January 31, 2006.  The determination of the convertibility of the notes occurs quarterly.  Depending upon the common stock price in the future, the notes may not be convertible in future quarters and therefore would not be

6

classified as current on our consolidated balance sheet.  Assuming a stock price of $45.06 (which was the closing stock price at January 31, 2006), conversion of all the notes would result in our payment of $155 million in cash and 3.0 million shares of common stock.

In connection with our issuance of the Convertible Senior Notes, we entered into a registration rights agreement pursuant to which we agreed to register the resale of the notes and underlying common stock by the holders thereof.  If we fail to keep the shelf registration statement related to this debt effective or usable in accordance with the registration rights agreement, then we may be required to pay liquidated damages to all holders of notes and all holders of our common stock issued upon conversion of the notes.  The liquidated damages to be paid are equal to an annual rate of 0.50% of the principal amount.  In November 2005, the shelf registration statement became no longer effective and, accordingly, we began accruing liquidated damages at approximately $2,100 per day.  For the six months ended January 31, 2006, we have recorded approximately $220,000 of expense related to these liquidated damages.  In the process of making this registration effective, on November 4, 2005, we filed a post-effective amendment to the registration statement; however, until the registration statement is declared effective, liquidated damages will be paid each quarter to the record holders.  Because we are not required to register the resale of the notes and underlying common stock after March 10, 2006, our liability for the payment of liquidated damages ends on that date.

In addition to the notes, through the end of the second fiscal quarter, we had a Credit Facility consisting primarily of a revolving loan facility permitting borrowings of up to $55.0 million, including a facility for swing line loans of up to $10.0 million, the issuance of letters of credit in an aggregate amount of up to $48.0 million.  Loans made under the revolving loan facility, including swing-line loans, bore interest at a variable rate determined on the date of borrowing that is related to various base rates and margins depending upon our leverage ratio and the location of the borrowing. The revolving loan facility was terminated on February 6, 2006 and replaced by another facility which is described in Note 9, Subsequent Event.  Until its termination, the Credit Facility prohibited us from, among other things, paying cash dividends. As of January 31, 2006, there were no borrowings and $5.2 million in letters of credit outstanding under the revolving loan facility, leaving $49.8 million available.

We also have various unsecured lines of credit, with lending institutions that operate in geographic areas not covered by the lending institutions in our Credit Facility, totaling $8.5 million that may be used exclusively for the issuance of letters of credit and bank guarantees. As of January 31, 2006, $1.7 million in letters of credit were outstanding under these lines.

Borrowings under the Credit Facility, prior to its termination on February 6, 2006, were secured by assets, including accounts receivable, equipment, vehicles, multi-client data library, intellectual property, and stock of certain material subsidiaries, owned by us and certain of our subsidiaries. At January 31, 2006, the carrying value of the secured assets, including intercompany receivables, which are eliminated in consolidation, was $1.3 billion. The Credit Facility and related documents contained a number of covenants, including financial covenants relating to interest coverage, leverage and net worth. These covenants related to measurements as of quarter ending dates, and, as of our last fiscal quarter ended January 31, 2006, we were in compliance with these covenants.

See Note 9, Subsequent Event for the discussion of the new credit facility that we entered into in February 2006.

7

5.              Pension plan

We maintain a contributory defined benefit pension plan for eligible participating employees in the United Kingdom.  The following is the net periodic benefit cost by component:

We have made contributions to this plan based on the schedule of contributions on which the above service cost was based and expect to complete these contributions, totaling approximately $1.3 million for the year, during fiscal 2006.

8

6.              Segment information

We have organized the company into four reportable segments: North and South America (NASA); Europe, Africa, Middle East and Commonwealth of Independent States (EAME); Asia Pacific (APAC); and Veritas Hampson Russell (VHR).  In NASA, EAME and APAC, we conduct geophysical surveys on both a contract and a multi-client basis. When we conduct surveys on a contract basis, we acquire and process data for a single client who pays us to conduct the survey and owns the data we acquire. When we conduct surveys on a multi-client basis, we acquire and process data for our own account and license that data and associated products to multiple clients.  NASA, EAME and APAC offer a common suite of these products and services to their customers, although each product or service may be adapted to meet the needs of the local markets.  VHR licenses geophysical software and provides geophysical reservoir consulting services.  The results of VHR’s operations were previously included in those of the NASA region; however, beginning in fiscal 2006, senior management began to review the results of VHR separately.  This segmentation of our company is representative of the manner in which it is viewed and managed by our senior managers and our Board of Directors.  The information related to the three and six months ended January 31, 2005 has been restated to reflect the new segment structure.  A reconciliation of the reportable segments’ results to those of the total enterprise is given below:

9

Corporate operating income (loss) includes certain general and administrative and research and development expenses not allocated to the segments.  Corporate assets consist primarily of cash and cash equivalents.

7.              Stock based compensation

As of August 1, 2005, we adopted the Financial Accounting Standard Board Statement No. 123(R) (SFAS 123R) to account for stock based employee compensation.  SFAS 123R requires us to record the cost of stock options and other equity-based compensation in our income statement based upon the estimated fair value of those awards.  We elected to use the modified prospective method for adoption, which requires compensation expense to be recorded for all unvested stock options and other equity-based compensation beginning in the first quarter of adoption.  Accordingly, prior periods have not been restated to reflect stock based compensation.  For all unvested options outstanding as of August 1, 2005, the previously measured but unrecognized compensation expense, based on the fair value at the original grant date, will be recognized in the statement of operations over the remaining vesting period. For equity-based compensation granted subsequent to August 1, 2005, compensation expense, based on the fair value on the date of grant, will be recognized in the statement of operations over the vesting period.  For deferred share units, it is our policy to determine the fair value of the units based on our common stock price at the date of grant which is then expensed over the applicable service period.

Prior to December 11, 2002, we had two employee nonqualified stock option plans under which options were granted to officers and select employees. Options generally vested over three years and were exercisable over a five to ten-year period from the date of grant. The exercise price for each option was the fair market value of the common stock on the grant date. Our Board of Directors authorized 5,954,550 shares of common stock to be issued under these option plans.

Prior to December 11, 2002, we also maintained a stock option plan for non-employee directors (the “Director Plan”) under which options were granted to our non-employee directors. The Director Plan provided that every year each eligible director was granted options to purchase 5,000 shares of our common stock which vest over a period of three years from the date of grant and are exercisable over five to ten years from the date of grant. The exercise price for each option granted was the fair market value at the date of grant. The Board of Directors authorized 600,000 shares of common stock to be issued under the Director Plan.

10

On December 11, 2002, we adopted our current Share Incentive Plan that provides for the issuance to directors, officers and select employees of: (1) nonqualified options to purchase our common stock, (2) incentive options to purchase our common stock, (3) share appreciation rights, (4) deferred share units, (5) restricted shares and (6) performance shares. Options issued to employees under the Share Incentive Plan have exercise prices equal to the fair market value at the date of grant; have five-year lives and vest over three years. Options issued to continuing non-employee directors under the Share Incentive Plan have exercise prices equal to the fair market value at the date of grant, have five-year lives and vest immediately.  As of January 31, 2006, 1.3 million shares were reserved for issuance under this plan, with no more than 0.3 million of those shares issuable in any form other than stock options.

Information related to stock based compensation follows:

SFAS 123R requires tax benefits relating to excess stock based compensation deductions to be prospectively presented in our statement of cash flows as financing cash inflows.  Accordingly, for the six months ended January 31, 2006, we reported approximately $2.0 million of excess tax benefits from stock based compensation as cash provided by financing activities on our statement of cash flows.

Our policy of meeting the requirements upon exercise of stock options is to issue new shares.

As of January 31, 2006, there was approximately $10.2 million of total unrecognized compensation cost related to nonvested share-based compensation arrangements.  That cost is expected to be recognized on a straight line basis over the vesting period, generally 3 years.

Stock options

The fair value of each option award granted after August 1, 2005 is estimated on the date of grant using a lattice-based option valuation model that uses the assumptions noted in the following table. Expected volatilities are based on implied volatilities from traded options on our stock and historical volatility of our stock.  We use historical data to estimate option exercise and employee termination within the valuation model; separate groups of employees were reviewed and shown to have similar historical exercise behavior and are considered together for valuation purposes.  The expected term of options granted is derived from the output of the option valuation model and represents the period of time that options granted are expected to be outstanding.  The risk-free rate for periods within the contractual life of the option is based on the U.S. Treasury yield curve at the time of grant.

11

The following table provides additional information related to this stock option plan:

The total intrinsic value of options exercised during the six months ended January 31, 2006 and 2005 was $19.1 million and $1.5 million, respectively.  Cash received from option exercises under all share-based payment arrangements for the six months ended January 31, 2006 was approximately $16.9 million.  The tax benefit realized for the tax deductions resulting from option exercises of share-based payment arrangements was approximately $3.0 million for the six months ended January 31, 2006.

Performance shares

During October 2005, certain participants were awarded rights to receive restricted shares of the company in October 2006.  Restricted shares will be granted, if earned, in October 2006.  The number of shares is based upon established performance targets that will be assessed at the end of the fiscal year.  The vesting of the issued restricted shares will be two years after the performance targets are assessed and therefore the service period is from the date of grant through July 31, 2008.  These shares were valued initially at $31.94 per share for a total value of $2.5 million based upon the market price of the shares at the award date and the expected outcome of the performance targets.  Based on the results for the six months ended January 31, 2006 and the increased potential that the fiscal 2006 performance targets will be exceeded, we accrued additional stock based compensation related to the performance shares during the three months ended January 31, 2006.  The shares are currently valued at $4.9 million, which will be recorded as compensation expense over the remaining service period.  The compensation expense related to this plan may continue to fluctuate based upon the expected outcome of the performance targets.

Restricted Stock

Restricted shares awarded generally vest ratably over 3 years.  The status of the restricted stock as of July 31, 2005 and the changes during the fiscal year through January 31, 2006 are presented below:

The weighted average grant date fair value for the granted restricted stock was $30.35 and $31.89 per share for the three and six months ended January 31, 2006, respectively.  The total fair value of shares vested during the three

12

and six months ended January 31, 2006 and 2005 was as follows (in thousands of dollars):

Employee Stock Purchase Plan

We also have an employee stock purchase plan which was approved by our stockholders. Originally 1,000,000 shares were authorized for issuance under this plan. Participation is voluntary and substantially all full-time employees meeting limited eligibility requirements may participate. Contributions are made through payroll deductions and may not be less than 1% or more than 15% of the participant’s base pay as defined. The participant’s option to purchase common stock is deemed to be granted on the first day and exercised on the last day of the fiscal quarter at a price that is the lower of 85% of the market price on the first or last day of the fiscal quarter.  Information related to the shares granted during the first and second quarters of fiscal 2006 is below.  The fair value was determined using the Black-Scholes option valuation method using the assumptions shown below.

Prior to August 1, 2005

Prior to August 1, 2005, we accounted for equity-based compensation using the intrinsic method prescribed in Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 25.  As required by SFAS 123R, we have disclosed below the effect on net income and earnings per share of equity-based employee compensation, including stock options, that would have been recorded using the fair value based method for the three and six months ended January 31, 2005.

13

The weighted average fair values of options granted during fiscal year 2005 were determined using the Black-Scholes option valuation method assuming no expected dividends. Other assumptions used are as follows:

8.              Exchangeable Shares

Two shares of special voting stock of Veritas DGC Inc. are authorized and outstanding, each as a series of common shares. One special voting share was issued in connection with the combination of Digicon Inc. (Veritas DGC Inc.’s former name) and Veritas Energy Services Inc. in August of 1996. The other special voting share was issued in connection with the combination of Veritas DGC Inc., Veritas Energy Services and Enertec Resources Inc. in September 1999.

These special voting shares possess a number of votes equal to the number of outstanding Veritas Energy Services exchangeable shares and Veritas Energy Services Class A exchangeable shares, Series 1 that are not owned by Veritas DGC Inc. or any of its subsidiaries.  Such exchangeable shares were issued to the former stockholders of Veritas Energy Services and Enertec Resources in business combinations with Veritas DGC Inc. In any matter submitted to Veritas DGC Inc. stockholders for a vote, each holder of a Veritas Energy Services exchangeable share has the right to instruct a trustee as to the manner of voting for one of the votes comprising the Veritas Energy Services special voting share for each Veritas Energy Services exchangeable share owned by the holder. Likewise, each holder of a Veritas Energy Services class A exchangeable share, series 1 has the right to instruct a trustee as to the manner of voting for one of the votes comprising the Enertec special voting share for each Veritas Energy Services Class A exchangeable shares, Series 1 owned by the holder. The Veritas Energy Services exchangeable shares and the Veritas Energy Services Class A exchangeable shares, Series 1 are convertible on a one-for-one basis into shares of the common stock and, when coupled with the voting rights afforded by the special voting shares, have rights virtually identical to Veritas DGC Inc. common stock. As a result, we treat the exchangeable shares as shares of our common stock for all purposes including the calculation of earnings per share information.

In January 2006, it was announced that Veritas Energy Services has accelerated the automatic redemption date of its exchangeable shares and its class A exchangeable shares, series 1 to May 16, 2006, and that Veritas DGC has exercised its right to redeem both classes of Veritas Energy Services exchangeable shares. On May 16, 2006, the closing date, each exchangeable share of both classes then outstanding will be exchanged for one share of Veritas DGC common stock. Following the redemption on May 16, Veritas DGC will own all of the issued and outstanding shares of Veritas Energy Services.  Therefore, after May 16, 2006, we expect to have only one class of stock outstanding.

9.              Subsequent Event

In February 2006, we entered into a new five-year $85 million revolving loan agreement with a syndicate of banks.  The new facility provides for revolving loans and the issuance of letters of credit to Veritas DGC Inc. and certain of its subsidiaries of up to $45 million in the United States, $15 million in Canada, $15 million in Singapore and $10 million in the United Kingdom.  Certain closing conditions are yet to be met with regard to the Singapore portion of the facility, but are currently expected to be satisfied in March 2006.  Until those conditions are met, the Singapore portion of the facility will not be available for borrowing or letters of credit.  The previous Credit Facility entered into in February 2003 was terminated.

The new facility is secured by pledges of accounts receivable, certain intercompany notes, stock in certain Veritas subsidiaries, and the U.S. land data library. Veritas and certain of its subsidiaries have also issued loan guarantees with respect to certain borrowings. Interest rates on borrowings under the facility are selected by the borrower at the time of any advance and, prior to April 30, 2006, the rates so selected may be either at LIBOR plus

14

1.00% or the Base Rate (defined as the lesser of the applicable prime rate or the federal funds rate). On and after April 30, 2006, these rates may be adjusted upward depending upon our leverage ratio (calculated as a ratio of funded debt versus EBITDA for the previous four quarters) to a maximum of LIBOR plus 1.50% or the base rate plus 0.50%. The loan agreement and related documents contain customary financial covenants and default provisions.

15

Item 2.    Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

This report on Form 10-Q and the documents incorporated by reference contain forward-looking statements, within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. These statements include statements incorporated by reference to other documents we file with the SEC. Forward-looking statements include, among other things, business strategy and expectations concerning industry conditions, market position, future operations, margins, profitability, liquidity and capital resources. Forward-looking statements generally can be identified by the use of terminology such as “may,” “will,” “expect,” “intend,” “estimate,” “anticipate” or “believe” or similar expressions or the negatives thereof. These expectations are based on management’s assumptions and current beliefs based on currently available information.  Although we believe that the expectations reflected in such statements are reasonable, we can give no assurance that such expectation will be correct. You are cautioned not to place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date of this report on Form 10-Q. Our operations are subject to a number of uncertainties, risks and other influences, many of which are outside our control, and any one of which, or a combination of which, could cause our actual results of operations to differ materially from the forward-looking statements. Important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from our expectations are disclosed in “Risk Factors” and elsewhere in our Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Overview

We believe that global exploration for oil and gas is increasing worldwide in key basins of interest.  While seismic has traditionally been used purely as an exploration tool, we are seeing growing interest in new seismic reservoir imaging techniques, such as multi- or wide-azimuth acquisition, which offer better delineation of complex structures and may advance the use of seismic in hydrocarbon production.  We believe all of this is promising for our business, although seismic spending will undoubtedly continue to fluctuate.

Our overall performance for the six months ended January 31, 2006 is the result of being well positioned to take advantage of the increased exploration and reservoir delineation spending.  This positioning includes having quality multi-client data in areas of current customer interest, data processing abilities that enable us to produce the highest quality seismic images, and field operations that are capable of providing technical as well as health, safety and environmental excellence.

The particularly strong performance of our land multi-client business in North America provides a solid indicator of our customers’ renewed interest and increased exploration activity in the Canadian and US markets.

Due to our sales and operational efforts and the robust seismic market, we have seen our backlog increase to $474 million at January 31, 2006 from $459 million at October 31, 2005 and $300 million at January 31, 2005.  We expect that approximately 80% of the backlog at January 31, 2006 will be completed during the next twelve months.

We have organized the company into four reportable segments: North and South America (NASA); Europe, Africa, Middle East and Commonwealth of Independent States (EAME); Asia Pacific (APAC); and Veritas Hampson Russell (VHR).  In NASA, EAME and APAC, we conduct geophysical surveys on both a contract and a multi-client basis. When we conduct surveys on a contract basis, we acquire and process data for a single client who pays us to conduct the survey and owns the data we acquire. When we conduct surveys on a multi-client basis, we acquire and process data for our own account and license that data and associated products to multiple clients.  NASA, EAME and APAC offer a common suite of these products and services to their customers, although each product or service may be adapted to meet the needs of the local markets.  VHR licenses geophysical software and provides geophysical reservoir consulting services.  The results of VHR’s operations were previously included in those of the NASA region; however, beginning in fiscal 2006, senior management began to review the results of VHR separately.  This segmentation of our company is representative of the manner in which it is viewed and managed by our senior managers and our Board of Directors.  The information related to the three and six months ended January 31, 2005 has been restated to reflect the new segment structure.

16

Results of operations

Three months ended January 31, 2006 compared with three months ended January 31, 2005

Revenues.  Our revenues increased by 24% from $192.2 million in the second quarter of fiscal 2005 to $238.9 million in the second quarter of fiscal 2006.

Multi-client revenue in the second quarter of fiscal 2006 increased $35.4 million, or 40%, compared to the prior year’s second fiscal quarter. Both land and marine multi-client revenue improved based on strengthening worldwide exploration spending resulting in increased seismic survey sales.  Land multi-client revenue increased by $31.9 million or 210% and marine multi-client increased $3.5 million or 5%.

Contract revenue in the second quarter of fiscal 2006 increased by $11.2 million, or 11%, from the prior year’s second fiscal quarter as a result of robust marine activity in the North Sea and Asia Pacific.  Revenue growth was partially offset by lower land contract revenue due to project delays as a result of unusually mild winter weather conditions in Canada.

All of our segments contributed to higher revenue, which was driven primarily by increased multi-client work.  NASA generated a $39.3 million revenue increase primarily through multi-client land work in Canada.  Asia Pacific region continued to experience increases in its marine contract work.

Revenues by contract type were as follows: