UNITED
STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
Form 6-K
REPORT OF
FOREIGN PRIVATE ISSUER PURSUANT TO
RULE 13a-16 OR 15d-16 UNDER THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE
ACT OF 1934
For the Month of September 2003
EDP- Electricidadé de Portugal
Praça Marquês de Pombal, 12
1250-162 Lisbon, Portugal
(Address of principal executive offices)
(Indicate by check
mark whether the registrant files or will file annual reports under cover of
Form 20-F or Form 40-F.)
Form 20-F ý Form 40-F
(Indicate by check
mark whether the registrant by
furnishing the information contained in this form
is also thereby furnishing the information to the
Commission pursuant to Rule 12g3-2(b) under the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934.)
Yes o No ý
Financial Results
1H2003
Investor Relations
Department
Pedro Pires, Head of IR
Gonçalo Santos
Elisabete Ferreira
Cristina Requicha
Rui Antunes
Tel: +351 21 001 2834
Fax: +351 21 001 2899
Email: ir@edp.pt
Site: www.edp.pt
Reuters: |
EDPP.IN / EDP.N |
Bloomberg: |
EDP PL / EDP US |
Lisbon, 3 September 2003
EDP - Electricidade de Portugal, S.A. Headquarters: Praça Marquês de Pombal,12 1250-162 Lisboa Portugal
Table of Contents
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
|
|
19 |
|
|
|
|
|
21 |
|
|
|
|
|
23 |
|
|
|
|
|
26 |
|
|
|
|
|
27 |
|
|
|
|
|
29 |
|
|
|
|
|
30 |
|
|
|
|
|
31 |
|
|
|
|
|
32 |
|
|
|
|
|
34 |
1H2003 Financial Results
m |
|
1H2003 |
|
1H2002 |
|
r% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating Revenues |
|
3,345.7 |
|
3,064.0 |
|
9.2 |
% |
Operating Costs |
|
2,468.0 |
|
2,318.0 |
|
6.5 |
% |
EBITDA |
|
877.7 |
|
746.0 |
|
17.6 |
% |
Operating Results |
|
406.8 |
|
353.3 |
|
15.2 |
% |
Financial Results |
|
(182.5 |
) |
(119.7 |
) |
-52.5 |
% |
Extraordinary Results |
|
59.4 |
|
48.2 |
|
23.2 |
% |
Net Income |
|
182.0 |
|
230.6 |
|
-21 |
% |
Earnings per share |
|
0.061 |
|
0.077 |
|
-21.1 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash Flow (1) |
|
652.9 |
|
623.4 |
|
4.7 |
% |
Adjusted Cash Flow (2) |
|
696.9 |
|
560.8 |
|
24.3 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating Investment |
|
342.8 |
|
447.0 |
|
-23.3 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial Debt |
|
8,003.1 |
|
7,994.1 |
|
0.1 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Debt |
|
7,860.3 |
|
7,780.1 |
|
1.0 |
% |
m |
|
rHC |
|
r Escelsa |
|
r Enersul |
|
1H2003(3) |
|
1H2002 |
|
r% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating Revenues |
|
228.8 |
|
124.7 |
|
72.2 |
|
2,919.9 |
|
3,064.0 |
|
-4.7 |
% |
Operating Costs |
|
179.1 |
|
94.2 |
|
51.7 |
|
2,142.9 |
|
2,318.0 |
|
-7.6 |
% |
EBITDA |
|
49.6 |
|
30.6 |
|
20.5 |
|
777.0 |
|
746.0 |
|
4.2 |
% |
Operating Results |
|
26.9 |
|
15.7 |
|
10.7 |
|
353.6 |
|
353.3 |
|
0.1 |
% |
General Indicators |
|
1H2003 |
|
1H2002 |
|
r% |
|
Number of electricity clients |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Portugal |
|
5,689,406 |
|
5,599,555 |
|
1.6 |
% |
Hidrocantábrico (4) |
|
557,686 |
|
544,101 |
|
2.5 |
% |
Brazil |
|
2,797,941 |
|
2,739,368 |
|
2.1 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Electricity sales (GWh) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Portugal |
|
19,000 |
|
18,681 |
|
1.7 |
% |
Hidrocantábrico (4) |
|
5,805 |
|
5,543 |
|
4.7 |
% |
Brazil |
|
9,165 |
|
9,422 |
|
-2.7 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of employees in the core business |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Portugal |
|
8,977 |
|
9,391 |
|
-4.4 |
% |
Hidrocantábrico (4) |
|
1,383 |
|
1,346 |
|
2.7 |
% |
Brazil |
|
3,640 |
|
3,745 |
|
-2.8 |
% |
The EDP Group reported a significant growth at the operating level in the first half of 2003. EBITDA increased by 131.7 million or 18%, and EBIT was up 53.6 million or 15%. The change in the Groups consolidation perimeter was an important reason for this increase in EBITDA. Hidrocantábrico contributed an additional 49.6 million, while Escelsa and Enersul added 30.6 million and 20.5 million respectively.
If we exclude this effect, the Groups EBITDA increased by a solid 4% or 31.0 million. The generation subsidiary EDP Produção contributed 9.7 million as a result of the companys successful effort in maintaining operating costs strictly under control. ONI had a positive impact of 22.4 million due to the increase in voice traffic, lower interconnection tariffs, rigorous cost cutting and the closure of its mobile venture ONI Way. The positive contribution of the abovementioned businesses was partly offset by Bandeirantes 11.5 million fall in EBITDA due to the devaluation of the Real. In local currency terms, the companys EBITDA was up 18%.
The Groups EBIT improved by 53.6 million or 15%. The new subsidiaries contributed 53.3 million. However, consolidated EBIT was negatively affected by higher amortisation charges and an increase in provisions at EDP Distribuição. The poor economic environment led to a 14.0 million increase in provisions of which 7.2 million relate to the higher level of doubtful debtors and a further 7.3 million relate to interest charged but not yet received on overdue electricity bills. The anticipated improvement in the economic environment will reverse this situation.
(1) Cash flow = Net Income + Depreciation + Provisions
(2) Adjusted Cash flow = Cash Flow + Tariff Adjustment + Hydrological Correction + Hydrological Account Interest
(3) Excluding the changes in the consolidation perimeter
(4) Hidrocantábrico is proportionally consolidated in accordance with EDPs stake in Hidrocantábrico (40%). Figures presented above correspond to Hidrocantábrico 100%.
Note: The accounts presented in this document are non-audited.
1
Revenues ( m) |
|
1H2003 |
|
1H2002 |
|
r% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EDP Produção |
|
643.6 |
|
726.2 |
|
-11.4 |
% |
EDP Distribuição |
|
1,788.3 |
|
1,727.7 |
|
3.5 |
% |
Hidrocantábrico |
|
280.1 |
|
51.4 |
|
|
|
Bandeirante |
|
226.6 |
|
345.4 |
|
-34.4 |
% |
Escelsa |
|
124.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
Enersul |
|
72.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
Telecoms |
|
161.7 |
|
149.2 |
|
8.4 |
% |
Information Technology |
|
95.2 |
|
113.8 |
|
-16.3 |
% |
Other & Adjustments |
|
(46.8 |
) |
(49.7 |
) |
5.7 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated |
|
3,345.7 |
|
3,064.0 |
|
9.2 |
% |
EBITDA ( m) |
|
1H2003 |
|
1H2002 |
|
r% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EDP Produção |
|
407.6 |
|
398.0 |
|
2.4 |
% |
EDP Distribuição |
|
265.1 |
|
266.8 |
|
-0.6 |
% |
Hidrocantábrico |
|
61.9 |
|
12.3 |
|
|
|
Bandeirante |
|
31.9 |
|
43.4 |
|
-26.5 |
% |
Escelsa |
|
30.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
Enersul |
|
20.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
Telecoms |
|
(2.5 |
) |
(24.9 |
) |
90.0 |
% |
Information Technology |
|
21.1 |
|
21.5 |
|
-1.7 |
% |
Other & Adjustments |
|
41.4 |
|
29.0 |
|
42.7 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated |
|
877.7 |
|
746.0 |
|
17.6 |
% |
EBIT ( m) |
|
1H2003 |
|
1H2002 |
|
r% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EDP Produção |
|
284.6 |
|
276.2 |
|
3.0 |
% |
EDP Distribuição |
|
50.1 |
|
74.8 |
|
-33.0 |
% |
Hidrocantábrico |
|
33.4 |
|
6.6 |
|
|
|
Bandeirante |
|
13.8 |
|
27.3 |
|
-49.3 |
% |
Escelsa |
|
15.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
Enersul |
|
10.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
Telecoms |
|
(38.4 |
) |
(58.1 |
) |
34.0 |
% |
Information Technology |
|
9.5 |
|
12.5 |
|
-23.8 |
% |
Other & Adjustments |
|
27.4 |
|
14.0 |
|
95.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated |
|
406.8 |
|
353.3 |
|
15.2 |
% |
Cost control is still a key management target. In the first half of this year supplies and services on a consolidated basis, stripping out the impact of first time consolidations, went down by 3%. Personnel costs were down 1%. EDP will continue to focus on cost cutting through operational savings and personnel reduction particularly now that an agreement has been reached with the regulator. Up to 485.7 million of the costs incurred in a dowsizing program for 2003 and 2004 will be passed through to the electricity tariff over the next 20 years as from 2005. This will allow the company to implement a thorough modernization program in order to reach the desired efficiency levels.
EDPs pre-tax profit was flat at 283.7 million following a 53% or 62.9 million net increase in financial charges versus the first half of 2002. Once again, the change in the consolidation perimeter was key. It had an impact on net interest costs of 28.1 million and 24.6 million in increased goodwill amortisation. The balance is due to the increase in debt at the holding level following the acquisition of the 40% stake in Hidrocantábrico and the first time appropriation of the accumulated losses since 2000 (7.2 million) from Electra (Cabo Verdes distribution company in which the Group owns 30.6%).
Despite the Groups good operating performance, net profit for the period decreased from 230.6 million in the 1H2002 to 182.0 million. There were several one-offs in the tax items.
The apparent tax rate went up from 30% to 39% or 25.4 million in absolute terms compared to the same period last year. The taxable base was negatively impacted by the increase in goodwill and the change in the consolidation method of Escelsa and Enersul. However the biggest impact was due to a 30 million swing over the previous years tax estimate: (i) 22,7 million less in 1H2002 relative to an over-estimation of 2001 taxes and : (ii) an additional 7,7 million in 1H2003 due to an under-estimation of 2002 taxes. This is a one-off item. Minorities were 25.1 million lower due lower net losses at Oni and the positive contribution of the Brazilian subsidiaries following their full consolidation.
2
Investments and Financial Debt
Operating Investments ( m) |
|
1H2003 |
|
YE2002 |
|
1H2002 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EDP Produção |
|
86.8 |
|
286.4 |
|
113.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EDP Distribuição |
|
141.2 |
|
371.2 |
|
137.8 |
|
(-) Subsidies in cash |
|
28.5 |
|
56.9 |
|
29.1 |
|
(-) Edinfor asset transfer |
|
|
|
80.5 |
|
38.4 |
|
(=) EDP Distribuição cash investments |
|
112.7 |
|
233.8 |
|
70.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hidrocantábrico (40%) |
|
33.2 |
|
84.8 |
|
30.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Brazil |
|
68.3 |
|
202.8 |
|
96.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Telecoms |
|
18.2 |
|
312.0 |
|
95.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Information Technology |
|
18.1 |
|
41.8 |
|
23.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
5.4 |
|
53.9 |
|
16.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
342.8 |
|
1,215.4 |
|
447.0 |
|
Financial Debt ( m) |
|
1H2003 |
|
YE2002 |
|
1H2002 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Holding (1) |
|
5,783.9 |
|
5,879.4 |
|
4,785.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EDP Produção |
|
67.6 |
|
69.1 |
|
71.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EDP Distribuição |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hidrocantábrico (40%) |
|
805.8 |
|
816.6 |
|
799.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Brazil |
|
631.4 |
|
550.2 |
|
226.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Telecoms |
|
675.0 |
|
622.1 |
|
589.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Information Technology |
|
22.6 |
|
25.6 |
|
34.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
16.8 |
|
31.0 |
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Financial Debt |
|
8,003.1 |
|
7,994.1 |
|
6,507.0 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
142.8 |
|
214.0 |
|
40.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Debt |
|
7,860.3 |
|
7,780.1 |
|
6,466.6 |
|
Operating investment totalled 342.8 million in the 1H2003. If we exclude ONI Ways investment in the 1H2002 (66.0 million), operating investment would have gone down 10.0%.
EDPP invested an extra 38.5 million in the new TER CCGT and 14.7 million in the expansion of the Venda Nova hydro power plant. EDPP also invested 6.5 million through Enernova (wind power generation) in adding 18MW installed capacity to the Serra do Barroso (12MW - 6 wind turbines) and Cabeço da Rainha (6MW 3 wind turbines) wind farms. Most of this capacity (90%) became available during the first half of 2003 but has not yet began operating. The company plans to invest around 400 million in 550MW of new wind generation capacity until 2008.
The bulk of recurring investment at EDPD was related to the expansion and improvement of the distribution network.
40% of Hidrocantábricos investment, amounting to an extra 33.2 million in EDP Groups capex, was mostly in wind farms. Two wind farms with 64 MW and 34 MW of installed capacity will start operating in August and October, respectively.
Oni invested 18.2 million in the 1H2003, or 5% of EDP Groups total investment. 61% of Onis investments were in the Spanish fixed line operations.
At the end of the first half of 2003, the EDP Groups total financial debt amounted to 8,003.1 million. Vis-à-vis the 1H2002, the holding companys debt increased by 999 million which includes the 783 million paid to EnBW to buy a 40% stake in Hidrocantábrico and the purchase of 357.4 million Bonds of Escelsa for USD268.7 million. The full consolidation of Escelsa and Enersul contributed a 329.3 million net increase to EDPs consolidated debt (net of EDP S.A.s portion of the purchased Escelsas Senior Notes - approximately 83%).
In the 1H2003, Oni and the Brazilian subsidiaries, account for 16% or 1,306.4 million of total EDP Groups consolidated debt. Excluding the minorities share of the financial debt of these subsidiaries, Oni and Brazil represent 531.7 million. In Brazil it is worth mentioning that the electric utilities are financing State receivables through special loans contracted with BNDES to compensate for the rationing losses and Parcela A costs. The 81.2 million increase in Brazilian subsidiaries debt since YE2002 is strongly influenced by the 13% Brazilian Real appreciation against the Euro in the period.
Following the year-on-year debt increase, total net debt over shareholders equity plus minorities, increased from 52% in the 1H2002 to 58% in the 1H2003. 2003 debt levels are expected to reflect peak funding for EDP.
(1) Net of overdrafts and deposits
3
Energy emission (GWh) |
|
1H2003 |
|
1H2002 |
|
r% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hydroelectric |
|
8,709 |
|
2,940 |
|
196.2 |
% |
Thermoelectric |
|
5,459 |
|
9,277 |
|
-41.2 |
% |
Binding Generation |
|
14,168 |
|
12,217 |
|
16.0 |
% |
HDN |
|
86 |
|
37 |
|
129.1 |
% |
Hidrocenel |
|
173 |
|
90 |
|
92.3 |
% |
EDP Energia |
|
170 |
|
57 |
|
197.1 |
% |
Non-Binding Generation |
|
429 |
|
185 |
|
132.3 |
% |
Biomass |
|
19 |
|
20 |
|
-0.9 |
% |
Wind Farms |
|
57 |
|
55 |
|
3.3 |
% |
Cogeneration |
|
346 |
|
294 |
|
17.4 |
% |
Small Hydro (1) |
|
128 |
|
65 |
|
94.9 |
% |
Special Regime Producers |
|
549 |
|
434 |
|
26.5 |
% |
Total EDP emission |
|
15,147 |
|
12,836 |
|
18.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pego thermal power station (SEP) |
|
1,812 |
|
2,501 |
|
-27.6 |
% |
Tapada thermal power station (SEP) |
|
2,112 |
|
3,917 |
|
-46.1 |
% |
Auto-producers (SEI) |
|
1,630 |
|
1,195 |
|
36.5 |
% |
Import / (Export) net |
|
940 |
|
257 |
|
265.2 |
% |
Direct sales to Ind. Clients (included in Cogeneration) |
|
-257 |
|
-223 |
|
-15.4 |
% |
Pumping |
|
(211 |
) |
(319 |
) |
34.1 |
% |
Gross demand |
|
21,174 |
|
20,165 |
|
5.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Synchronous compensation |
|
(20 |
) |
(20 |
) |
-2.3 |
% |
Own consumption - generation |
|
(2 |
) |
(2 |
) |
-4.5 |
% |
Own consumption - transmission grid |
|
(5 |
) |
(5 |
) |
1.9 |
% |
Losses |
|
(398 |
) |
(313 |
) |
27.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Energy delivered to distribution |
|
20,749 |
|
19,824 |
|
4.7 |
% |
EDP thermal emission (GWh) |
|
1H2003 |
|
1H2002 |
|
r% |
|
Tapada do Outeiro |
|
(0 |
) |
28 |
|
|
|
Carregado |
|
290 |
|
1,314 |
|
-77.9 |
% |
Barreiro |
|
75 |
|
167 |
|
-55.3 |
% |
Setúbal |
|
699 |
|
3,071 |
|
-77.2 |
% |
Sines |
|
4,390 |
|
4,695 |
|
-6.5 |
% |
Alto de Mira + Tunes |
|
6 |
|
2 |
|
174.7 |
% |
EDP thermal emission in the PES |
|
5,459 |
|
9,277 |
|
-41.2 |
% |
Hydrological Cofficient
EDP Produçãos (EDPP) total emission reached 15,147 GWh in 1H2003, of which 61% was hydro generation compared to 25% in 1H2002;
The 18.0% increase in EDPPs emission is due to heavy rainfall at the beginning of the year (hydrological coefficient of 1.30 in 1H2003, 0.51 in 1H2002) and a 5.0% increase in Gross Demand following a cold winter;
Given that EDPP owns virtually all the hydro installed capacity in Portugal, its contribution to the total energy delivered to the system rose from 64% in 1H2002 to 72% in 1H2003.
(1) HDN, Hidrocenel and EDP Energias power stations with installed capacity of less than 10 MW operating in the Non-Biding system are remunerated as Special Regime Producers (SRP). SRP generation in HDN represented 88 GWh in 1H2003 and 45 GWh in 1H2002, in Hidrocenel represented 28 GWh in 1H2003 and 17 GWh in 1H2002 and in EDP Energia represented 12 GWh in 1H2003 and 4 GWh in 1H2002.
4
Electricity sales ( m) |
|
1H2003 |
|
1H2002 |
|
r% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PPA Capacity Charge |
|
440.5 |
|
430.7 |
|
2.3 |
% |
PPA Energy Charge |
|
114.4 |
|
240.7 |
|
-52.5 |
% |
Total CPPE |
|
554.9 |
|
671.5 |
|
-17.4 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
HDN |
|
23.1 |
|
11.5 |
|
100.3 |
% |
Hidrocenel |
|
21.7 |
|
11.1 |
|
94.6 |
% |
Total Small Hydro |
|
44.8 |
|
22.7 |
|
97.5 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Wind powered (Enernova) |
|
5.0 |
|
4.6 |
|
7.8 |
% |
Cogeneration (Soporgen & Energin) |
|
20.5 |
|
12.4 |
|
64.8 |
% |
Biomass (Bioléctrica) |
|
1.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total EDP Produção |
|
626.5 |
|
711.2 |
|
-11.9 |
% |
1H2003
1H2002
Fuel costs ( m) |
|
1H2003 |
|
1H2002 |
|
r% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Coal |
|
59.7 |
|
77.1 |
|
-22.6 |
% |
Fuel-oil |
|
45.0 |
|
146.7 |
|
-69.3 |
% |
Natural Gas |
|
5.8 |
|
5.2 |
|
11.6 |
% |
Diesel |
|
0.7 |
|
0.3 |
|
151.8 |
% |
CPPE |
|
111.1 |
|
229.2 |
|
-51.5 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Natural Gas (Soporgen & Energin) |
|
18.9 |
|
10.5 |
|
79.9 |
% |
Forest waste (Bioeléctrica) |
|
1.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total EDP Produção |
|
131.0 |
|
239.7 |
|
-45.3 |
% |
Electricity Purchases ( m) |
|
1H2003 |
|
1H2002 |
|
r% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
HDN & Hidrocenel |
|
30.4 |
|
6.7 |
|
|
|
1H2003
1H2002
The PPA capacity charge increased 2.3%, reflecting i) higher availability factors at the CPPEs hydro and thermal power plants and ii) the charge adjustment for inflation as foreseen in the PPA contracts;
The PPA energy charge dropped 52.5% due to a lower utilization of CPPEs thermal plants, because of a wet semester. CPPE was once again able to buy coal and fuel at a lower price than the EU coal price index reflected in the PPA energy charge (111.1 million vs. 114.4 million). The increase in the natural gas cost in 1H2003 is artificial since only 5 months costs were booked in 1H2002 (3,0 million respecting to the consumption of the month of June were only accounted for in the 3Q2002).
Despite lower revenues, the electricity generation gross profit at EDPPs remained stable in 1H2003 at 465.1 million. This is explained by the recurring high availability of CPPEs power plants and the abovementioned efficient fuel procurement.
5
Non-Group Supplies & Services ( m) |
|
1H2003 |
|
1H2002 |
|
r% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Insurance costs |
|
3.9 |
|
7.8 |
|
-49.1 |
% |
Maintenance costs |
|
6.3 |
|
9.0 |
|
-29.4 |
% |
Surveilance and security |
|
1.1 |
|
1.2 |
|
-10.2 |
% |
Specialized works |
|
2.0 |
|
1.2 |
|
67.5 |
% |
Other |
|
8.3 |
|
6.9 |
|
19.8 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Non-Group S&S |
|
21.7 |
|
26.1 |
|
-16.8 |
% |
Personnel costs ( m) |
|
1H2003 |
|
1H2002 |
|
r% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Personnel Costs |
|
61.0 |
|
60.9 |
|
0.2 |
% |
Pension Premiums |
|
5.9 |
|
5.5 |
|
8.0 |
% |
Early Retirement Correction |
|
6.6 |
|
6.6 |
|
-0.1 |
% |
Social benefits with early retirees |
|
0.7 |
|
0.7 |
|
-11.1 |
% |
Medical care with inactives |
|
1.5 |
|
1.2 |
|
29.5 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjusted Personnel Costs |
|
46.3 |
|
46.9 |
|
-1.3 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of employees |
|
2,101 |
|
2,181 |
|
-3.7 |
% |
Non-group supplies and services drop 16.8%. However there are some facts that influence this analysis: i) 1H2002 include most of the years insurance charge, while 1H2003 includes just 6 months and; ii) During 1H2003 EDP Produção S.A., the holding company of EDPs generation business in Portugal, moved to a rented building. If we adjust for this, non-group supplies and services in 1H2003 would have dropped 8.8% from 1H2002, thanks to strict management of maintenance costs.
Supplies and services provided by Group companies in 1H2003 remained at 7.3 million, approximately half of YE2001 levels, as anticipated in the YE2002 Financial Results report.
Personnel costs for the period remained constant at 61.0 million. When corrected for all early-retirements costs, pension premiums and other costs associated with non-active workers, personnel costs fell 1.3%. There was a net reduction of 80 employees in EDPPs workforce since 1H2002 to 1H2003, mostly attributable to the tranfer of personnel to EDP Valor in the last quarter of 2002.
6
Operating Income Statement ( m) |
|
1H2003 |
|
1H2002 |
|
r% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Electricity Sales |
|
626.5 |
|
711.2 |
|
-11.9 |
% |
Services Provided |
|
7.5 |
|
8.5 |
|
-12.6 |
% |
Other Sales |
|
9.6 |
|
6.5 |
|
48.9 |
% |
Operating Revenues |
|
643.6 |
|
726.2 |
|
-11.4 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Electricity |
|
30.4 |
|
6.7 |
|
|
|
Fuel for electricity generation |
|
131.0 |
|
239.7 |
|
-45.3 |
% |
Direct Activity Costs |
|
161.4 |
|
246.4 |
|
-34.5 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross Profit |
|
482.2 |
|
479.8 |
|
0.5 |
% |
Gross Profit/Revenues |
|
74.9 |
% |
66.1 |
% |
8.9 |
p.p. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sundry materials and goods for resale |
|
2.0 |
|
2.4 |
|
-15.6 |
% |
Supplies and services - Group |
|
7.3 |
|
7.6 |
|
-4.3 |
% |
Supplies and services - Non-Group |
|
21.7 |
|
26.1 |
|
-16.8 |
% |
Personnel costs |
|
61.0 |
|
60.9 |
|
0.2 |
% |
Generation centre rentals |
|
1.9 |
|
1.8 |
|
3.2 |
% |
Other operating costs (or revenues) |
|
(1.9 |
) |
(2.4 |
) |
22.0 |
% |
Own work capitalised |
|
(17.5 |
) |
(14.6 |
) |
-19.6 |
% |
Operating Costs |
|
74.6 |
|
81.8 |
|
-8.9 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EBITDA |
|
407.6 |
|
398.0 |
|
2.4 |
% |
EBITDA / Revenues |
|
63.3 |
% |
54.8 |
% |
8.5 |
p.p. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortisation |
|
118.1 |
|
113.2 |
|
4.4 |
% |
Provisions |
|
4.9 |
|
8.6 |
|
-42.6 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EBIT |
|
284.6 |
|
276.2 |
|
3.0 |
% |
EBIT / Revenues |
|
44.2 |
% |
38.0 |
% |
6.2 |
p.p. |
Investment ( m) |
|
1H2003 |
|
1H2002 |
|
r% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Binding Generation |
|
24.0 |
|
16.4 |
|
46.1 |
% |
Non-Binding Generation |
|
39.3 |
|
85.8 |
|
-54.2 |
% |
Special Regime Producers |
|
7.4 |
|
5.1 |
|
46.4 |
% |
Other investments |
|
4.1 |
|
1.3 |
|
217.7 |
% |
Financial costs and Investments |
|
12.0 |
|
5.3 |
|
127.1 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total investment |
|
86.8 |
|
113.9 |
|
-23.8 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recurring investment |
|
10.2 |
|
9.5 |
|
8.3 |
% |
Non-recurring investment |
|
76.6 |
|
104.4 |
|
-26.7 |
% |
Main Generation Investments at technical cost:
Total Forecast |
|
139.0 |
|
Conclusion date |
|
Sep-2004 |
|
Invested to Date |
|
89.7 or 64.6% |
|
Total Forecast |
|
478.0 |
|
Conclusion date |
|
2004 |
|
Invested to Date |
|
243.8 or 51.0% |
|
7
Energy Sales (GWh) |
|
1H2003 |
|
1H2002 |
|
r% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Energy delivered to Distribution |
|
20,749 |
|
19,826 |
|
4.7 |
% |
Own consumption - distribution |
|
(12 |
) |
(11 |
) |
11.9 |
% |
Distribution losses |
|
(1,225 |
) |
(1,037 |
) |
18.2 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total electricity sales (1) |
|
19,512 |
|
18,778 |
|
3.9 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Electricity sales - PES |
|
17,982 |
|
18,448 |
|
-2.5 |
% |
VHV (Very high voltage) |
|
554 |
|
405 |
|
37.0 |
% |
HV (High voltage) |
|
1,718 |
|
1,736 |
|
-1.0 |
% |
MV (Medium voltage) |
|
4,679 |
|
5,688 |
|
-17.7 |
% |
SLV (Special low voltage) |
|
1,496 |
|
1,422 |
|
5.2 |
% |
LV (Low voltage) |
|
8,930 |
|
8,653 |
|
3.2 |
% |
PL (Public lighting) |
|
605 |
|
544 |
|
11.3 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Electricity sales NBES |
|
1,530 |
|
330 |
|
|
|
EDP |
|
1,018 |
|
233 |
|
|
|
HV (High voltage) |
|
30 |
|
39 |
|
-23.2 |
% |
MV (Medium voltage) |
|
989 |
|
194 |
|
|
|
Non-EDP |
|
512 |
|
97 |
|
|
|
HV (High voltage) |
|
35 |
|
49 |
|
-28.0 |
% |
MV (Medium voltage) |
|
477 |
|
49 |
|
|
|
Electricity consumers |
|
1H2003 |
|
1H2002 |
|
r |
|
Electricity consumers |
|
1H2003 |
|
1H2002 |
|
r |
|
VHV (Very high voltage) |
|
13 |
|
11 |
|
2 |
|
HV (High voltage) |
|
102 |
|
97 |
|
5 |
|
MV (Medium voltage) |
|
19,307 |
|
20,084 |
|
(777 |
) |
SLV (Special low voltage) |
|
27,582 |
|
26,967 |
|
615 |
|
LV (Low voltage) |
|
5,599,799 |
|
5,511,812 |
|
87,987 |
|
PL (Public lighting) |
|
41,690 |
|
40,549 |
|
1,141 |
|
Binding consumers |
|
5,688,493 |
|
5,599,520 |
|
88,973 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
HV (High voltage) |
|
2 |
|
2 |
|
|
|
MV (Medium voltage) |
|
911 |
|
33 |
|
878 |
|
EDP |
|
913 |
|
35 |
|
878 |
|
HV (High voltage) |
|
2 |
|
3 |
|
(1 |
) |
MV (Medium voltage) |
|
329 |
|
10 |
|
319 |
|
Non-EDP |
|
331 |
|
13 |
|
318 |
|
Non-binding consumers |
|
1,244 |
|
48 |
|
1,196 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total electricity consumers |
|
5,689,737 |
|
5,599,568 |
|
90,169 |
|
% Growth |
|
|
|
|
|
1.6 |
% |
Total electricity distributed in the 1H2003 reached 19,512 GWh, which represents an annual growth of 3.9% in Portugals electricity consumption. The binding system (PES Public Electricity System) accounted for 92.2% of the total energy distributed in Portugal.
Energy sales in the PES were influenced by: (i) a cold winter and (ii) the transfer of some HV and MV customers from the binding to the non-binding system. SLV and LV segments continue to grow at healthy rates of 5.2% and 3.2%, respectively. Additionally, EDPD gained two industrial clients that explain the 37% increase in VHV energy sales.
In the Non-Binding Electricity System (NBES), which is benefiting from a growing liberalization, EDP achieved a 66.6% market share, with 1,018 GWh of electricity sold to its 913 clients.
Currently, the eligibility threshold for the non-binding system includes all consumers except low voltage ones. By the end of the 1H2003, there were 20,666 eligible clients of which 1,244 chose to acquire energy in the liberalized market. By the end of June 2003, EDP was supplying 913 clients, 563 of which became EDP Energys clients during the 1H2003. The electricity market should be liberalized for all voltage levels by the end of 1H2004.
(1) Figure presented include Sales to EDP Group.
8
EDP Distribuiçãos (EDPD) 1H2003 electricity revenues amounted to 1,778.8 million, up 3.6% from the 1H2002.
As mentioned in previous releases, according to the current Portuguese regulation, differences between ERSEs forecasts for a given year, regarding EDPDs electricity purchases per kWh, and the unit cost the company actually incurred after taking into account real consumption gives rise to an adjustment that is to be recovered by the company in the tariffs one year later.
Additionally, for the 2002-2004 regulatory period, in order to allow for a more efficient pass-through to final tariffs of variations in fuel costs (variable component of energy acquisition costs), ERSE established a mechanism of quarterly adjustments. Accordingly, differences between estimated and real fuel costs are calculated on a quarterly basis and are subsequently: (i) billed by REN to EDPD with a lag of 6 months and (ii) passed-through to final tariffs with a lag of 6 months for HV/MV segments and in the following year for LV segments.
Therefore, the 15.0 million tariff adjustment that was recognized in the 1H2003 is composed of the following: (i) 3.4 million from the reposition of the positive tariff adjustment booked in the 1H2001; (ii) 5.1 million from the reposition of last years positive tariff adjustment that resulted from the above mentioned mechanism of quarterly adjustments; (iii) 5.5 million from the 1H2003 tariff adjustment as real consumption for the period was below ERSEs estimate (5.0% growth) used to set up 2003 tariffs not allowing for the full recovery of EDPDs fixed component of its electricity purchases and (iv) 17.9 million relate to an extraordinary adjustment made to the 2002 tariff adjustment following a correction to the amounts of electricity distributed last year (36,931 GWh instead of 36,741 GWh).
We recall that for EDPD, electricity purchases are a complete pass-through to the tariff to final clients. Consequently, the 3.8% increase in electricity gross profit is a result of: (i) a 16.8% rise in allowed revenues for Network Services activity; (ii) a 54.7% increase in allowed revenues for the Supply in the Public system activity; (iii) a 3.8% and 2.9% decrease from 2002 to 2003 (in accordance with the CPI - X formula), in unit revenues for the Use of the Distribution Grid activity for HV/MV and LV segments, respectively and (iv) a 1.2% estimated increase in electricity consumption (see note below).
Regulated Revenues (URD adjusted to 2002 consumption) |
|
1H2003 |
|
1H2002 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unit revenue for the Use of the Distribution Grid: HV and MV ( / MWh) |
|
9.84 |
|
10.23 |
|
Electricity delivered to binding and non-binding consumers: HV and MV (GWh) |
|
19,136 |
|
18,842 |
|
Unit revenue for the Use of the Distribution Grid: LV ( / MWh) |
|
24.55 |
|
25.29 |
|
Electricity delivered to binding and non-binding consumers: LV (GWh) |
|
10,796 |
|
10,448 |
|
t-2 tariff adjustment ( m) |
|
(7.0 |
) |
(7.0 |
) |
URD total allowed revenues ( m) |
|
446.5 |
|
450.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowed revenues for the Network Services activity: VHV; HV and MV ( m) |
|
11.7 |
|
5.6 |
|
Allowed revenues for the Network Services activity: SLV ( m) |
|
4.6 |
|
4.7 |
|
Allowed revenues for the Network Services activity: LV ( m) |
|
63.2 |
|
57.8 |
|
t-2 tariff adjustment ( m) |
|
|
|
|
|
CRedes total allowed revenues ( m) |
|
79.5 |
|
68.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowed revenues for the Supply in the Public System activity: VHV; HV and MV ( m) |
|
4.2 |
|
1.9 |
|
Allowed revenues for the Supply in the Public System activity: SLV ( m) |
|
1.2 |
|
0.9 |
|
Allowed revenues for the Supply in the Public System activity: LV ( m) |
|
39.4 |
|
36.3 |
|
t-2 tariff adjustment ( m) |
|
11.4 |
|
(2.8 |
) |
CSEP total allowed revenues ( m) |
|
56.1 |
|
36.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
t-1 tariff adjustment ( m) for Energy Aquisition activity |
|
5.1 |
|
|
|
Total allowed revenues after tariff adjustment ( m) |
|
587.2 |
|
554.3 |
|
Electricity Sales & Gross Profit Analysis( m) |
|
1H2003 |
|
1H2002 |
|
r% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
VHV (Very High Voltage) |
|
24.4 |
|
17.2 |
|
41.8 |
% |
HV (High Voltage) |
|
83.7 |
|
80.4 |
|
4.1 |
% |
MV (Medium Voltage) |
|
337.8 |
|
404.9 |
|
-16.6 |
% |
SLV (Special Low Voltage) |
|
142.9 |
|
138.1 |
|
3.5 |
% |
LV (Low Voltage) |
|
1,113.5 |
|
1,059.3 |
|
5.1 |
% |
Public lighting |
|
49.2 |
|
43.3 |
|
13.5 |
% |
Interruptibility discounts |
|
(12.9 |
) |
(12.6 |
) |
-2.3 |
% |
Tariff correction discounts |
|
(0.8 |
) |
(3.2 |
) |
75.3 |
% |
Invoiced Sales - PES |
|
1,737.8 |
|
1,727.5 |
|
0.6 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Invoiced Sales - NBES (1) |
|
26.1 |
|
3.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Distribution 2000 Reposition |
|
|
|
10.2 |
|
|
|
Distribution 2001 Reposition |
|
(3.4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Distribution 2002 Reposition |
|
(5.1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Distribution 2002 |
|
17.9 |
|
(23.3 |
) |
|
|
Distribution 2003 |
|
5.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
Tariff Adjustments |
|
15.0 |
|
(13.0 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Electricity Revenues |
|
1,778.8 |
|
1,717.8 |
|
3.6 |
% |
Tariff adjustments reposition |
|
(8.5 |
) |
10.2 |
|
|
|
Reposition of extraordinary tariff adjustment |
|
17.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
Sales to customers before reposition |
|
1,769.4 |
|
1,707.6 |
|
3.6 |
% |
Electricity purchases |
|
1,182.2 |
|
1,141.6 |
|
3.6 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Electricity Gross Profit |
|
587.2 |
|
566.0 |
|
3.8 |
% |
(1) For the 1H2002, these revenues were accounted for under Services Provided. As such, for comparison purposes the figures presented in 1H2002 include the amount accounted for under that item (3.3 million ).
Note: Allowed Revenues for the 1H2003 and 1H2002 were calculated on the basis of estimated consumption for the period.
9
Non-Group Supplies & Services ( m) |
|
1H2003 |
|
1H2002 |
|
r% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Maintenance costs |
|
14.0 |
|
21.8 |
|
-35.8 |
% |
Specialized works |
|
17.0 |
|
14.8 |
|
14.9 |
% |
Communications |
|
8.2 |
|
7.9 |
|
3.3 |
% |
Insurance costs |
|
2.7 |
|
4.1 |
|
-32.6 |
% |
Others |
|
10.8 |
|
10.6 |
|
2.2 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Non-Group S&S |
|
52.7 |
|
59.1 |
|
-10.9 |
% |
Personnel costs ( m) |
|
1H2003 |
|
1H2002 |
|
r% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Personnel Costs |
|
202.5 |
|
196.1 |
|
3.3 |
% |
Pension premiums |
|
28.0 |
|
21.2 |
|
32.2 |
% |
Early retirement correction |
|
38.2 |
|
38.8 |
|
-1.7 |
% |
Social benefits with early retirees |
|
5.6 |
|
6.2 |
|
-8.3 |
% |
Medical care with inactives |
|
6.7 |
|
6.5 |
|
3.2 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjusted Personnel Costs |
|
123.9 |
|
123.3 |
|
0.5 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of employees |
|
6,808 |
|
7,192 |
|
-5.3 |
% |
The 10.9% decrease in supplies and services can be explained by the following: (i) a 35.8% fall in maintenance costs due to both the renegotiation of some maintenance contracts, as payments are no longer made under a retainer basis, and a higher recourse to EDPDs internal resources; (ii) in 2002 insurance costs were heavily weighted in the first half due to a pessimistic expectation of the increase in 2002s insurance premiums. The increased in bad debts led an increase in costs with energy cut-offs. Additionaly, The introduction of the SAP platform in 2002 meant that many costs with billing services were accounted for only in the 2H2002 and therefore the comparison is unfavourable. Specialized works increased 14.9% versus the same period last year.
Personnel costs for the period totalled 202.5 million, up 3.3% year-on-year, reflecting: (i) a reduction of 384 employees and (ii) a 2.7% average salary increase. If adjusted to exclude all early-retirement costs, pension premiums and other costs associated with non-active workers, active personnel costs would have increased by a mere 0.5%. Note that during the 2Q2003, EDPD reduced its workforce by 122 employees.
We recall that on the 8th of August, ERSE approved the pass-through to final tariffs of EDPDs 2003 and 2004 restructuring costs associated with the Human Resources Rationalisation Program. Consequently, EDPD can now proceed with its personnel reduction (including early retirements) program for the years 2003 and 2004, which we recall had been suspended, with the certainty that up to 485.7 million will be recovered through the tariffs.
* Annualised in 1H2003
10
Operating Income Statement ( m) |
|
1H2003 |
|
1H2002 |
|
r% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Electricity Sales - Group |
|
15.8 |
|
1.3 |
|
|
|
Electricity Sales - Non-Group |
|
1,763.1 |
|
1,713.2 |
|
2.9 |
% |
Services Provided |
|
8.6 |
|
12.5 |
|
-31.0 |
% |
Other Sales |
|
0.8 |
|
0.7 |
|
19.6 |
% |
Operating Revenues |
|
1,788.3 |
|
1,727.7 |
|
3.5 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Direct Activity Costs |
|
1,182.2 |
|
1,141.6 |
|
3.6 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross Profit |
|
606.1 |
|
586.1 |
|
3.4 |
% |
Gross Profit/Revenues |
|
33.9 |
% |
33.9 |
% |
0.0 |
p.p. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sundry materials and goods for resale |
|
51.3 |
|
31.0 |
|
65.6 |
% |
Supplies and services - Group |
|
42.8 |
|
30.0 |
|
42.7 |
% |
Supplies and services - Non-group |
|
52.7 |
|
59.1 |
|
-10.9 |
% |
Personnel costs |
|
202.5 |
|
196.1 |
|
3.3 |
% |
Concession fees |
|
85.5 |
|
76.4 |
|
12.0 |
% |
Other operating costs (or revenues) |
|
(5.8 |
) |
(5.3 |
) |
-9.6 |
% |
Own work capitalised |
|
(88.1 |
) |
(67.9 |
) |
-29.8 |
% |
Operating costs |
|
340.9 |
|
319.3 |
|
6.8 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EBITDA |
|
265.1 |
|
266.8 |
|
-0.6 |
% |
EBITDA / Revenues |
|
14.8 |
% |
15.4 |
% |
-0.6 |
p.p. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
173.1 |
|
164.1 |
|
5.5 |
% |
Provisions |
|
42.0 |
|
27.9 |
|
50.2 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EBIT |
|
50.1 |
|
74.8 |
|
-33.0 |
% |
EBIT/ Revenues |
|
2.8 |
% |
4.3 |
% |
-1.5 |
p.p. |
Investment ( m) |
|
1H2003 |
|
1H2002 |
|
r% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Distribution Grid |
|
106.1 |
|
86.7 |
|
22.4 |
% |
Public lighting |
|
8.3 |
|
4.2 |
|
95.8 |
% |
Information Systems |
|
8.1 |
|
38.4 |
|
|
|
Other Investments |
|
18.8 |
|
8.5 |
|
121.8 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating investment |
|
141.2 |
|
137.8 |
|
2.5 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment Subsidies (Cash) |
|
28.5 |
|
29.1 |
|
-2.2 |
% |
Operating investment (excluding subsidies) |
|
112.7 |
|
108.7 |
|
3.7 |
% |
Despite a 3.4% increase in EDPDs gross profit, EBITDA fell 0.6% year-on-year due to: (i) a 42.7% increase in Group supplies and services, most of which is explained by a 10.3 million bill related to services supplied by EDP Valor and (ii) a 12.0% increase in concession fees reflecting the 0.25 p.p. increase in the average rate paid to municipalities (7.25% on the previous years low voltage sales).
EBIT, which fell by 33.0% year-on-year, was negatively affected by: (i) the creation of a 7.3 million provision regarding interest charges due to late payment of bills from municipalities; (ii) a 7.2 million increase in bad debt provisions reflecting the Portuguese economic slowdown and (iii) a 5.5% increase in amortization mostly due to the transfer from Edinfor to EDPD of an IT system worth 80.5 million to be amortized over 6 years, and that Edinfor accounted for as Works in Progress. Also note that the increased costs in sundry materials are being capitalised and accounted for as Own Work Capitalised and then depreciated.
Operating Investment for the 1H2002 includes 38.4 million that relate to the above mentioned transfer of assets. Excluding this amount, which does not affect the Group cash-(out)flow, EDPDs operating investment would have increased 42.1% year-on-year. The majority of this investment was made on the distribution grid, of which 28.5 million relate to investments subsidised in cash by EDPDs clients.
11
Hidrocantábrico (100%) - Generation
Spain Energy Balance (GWh) |
|
1H2003 |
|
1H2002 |
|
r% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Generation |
|
89,495 |
|
85,478 |
|
4.7 |
% |
Special Regime |
|
20,184 |
|
16,981 |
|
18.9 |
% |
Imports |
|
4,261 |
|
4,531 |
|
-6.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Demand |
|
113,940 |
|
106,990 |
|
6.5 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Regulated Distribution |
|
79,082 |
|
74,959 |
|
5.5 |
% |
Supply |
|
31,342 |
|
30,548 |
|
2.6 |
% |
Exports |
|
3,515 |
|
1,483 |
|
137.0 |
% |
HCs Net Electricity Generation (GWh) |
|
1H2003 |
|
1H2002 |
|
r% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hydroelectric |
|
536 |
|
385 |
|
39.2 |
% |
Nuclear |
|
578 |
|
528 |
|
9.5 |
% |
Aboño |
|
3,068 |
|
3,600 |
|
-14.8 |
% |
Soto de Ribera |
|
1,770 |
|
2,419 |
|
-26.8 |
% |
Coal |
|
4,839 |
|
6,019 |
|
-19.6 |
% |
Castejón CCGT |
|
493 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Generation |
|
6,446 |
|
6,932 |
|
-7.0 |
% |
Pumping |
|
(63 |
) |
(56 |
) |
13.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Energy delivered to the Pool |
|
6,383 |
|
6,876 |
|
-7.2 |
% |
HCs Performance in the Pool |
|
1H2003 |
|
1H2002 |
|
r% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average HC Selling Price (1) (/MWh) |
|
32.33 |
|
47.83 |
|
-32.4 |
% |
Average Pool Price (1) (/MWh) |
|
34.07 |
|
51.66 |
|
-34.0 |
% |
HCs market share in wholesale market |
|
7.1 |
% |
8.0 |
% |
-0.9 |
p.p. |
HCs Fuel Costs |
|
1H2003 |
|
1H2002 |
|
r% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average HC Fuel Cost (/MWh) (2) |
|
15.32 |
|
16.74 |
|
-8.5 |
% |
Demand in the Spanish electricity market grew by6.5% (or 4.7% excluding exports) in comparison with the 1H2002 mainly explained by the harsh winter, when the Spanish electricity market reached consumption records.
Hydroelectric generation as a percentage of total Spanish electricity emission was much higher following a wet semester. In these market conditions the average pool price fell strongly in comparison with the 1H2002, resulting in a 32% drop in Hidrocantábricos average sale price to 32.33/MWh. Nevertheless, in the 2Q2003 the pool prices increased vis-à-vis 1Q2003 as a consequence of a lower hydroelectric emission in this period.
Given that Hidrocantábrico is heavily dependent on thermal power, the companys net emission fell 7.2% on a yearly basis reflected in a 0.9 p.p. drop in market share to 7.1%. Nevertheless, in the 2Q2003 Hidrocantábrico was able to reach a 7.5% market share since the systems thermal power plants emission increased in this period.
Hidrocantábricos average fuel cost decreased 8.5% explained by a 17% year-on-year fall in the coal unit cost.
(1) Includes wholesale market, ancillary services and capacity payment.
(2) Excluding hydroelectric emission.
12
Hidrocantábrico (100%) - Distribution & Supply
Distribution
Energy Sales - GWh
Electricity |
|
1H2003 |
|
1H2002 |
|
r% |
|
Low Voltage |
|
1,077 |
|
1,018 |
|
5.8 |
% |
Medium Voltage |
|
434 |
|
406 |
|
6.9 |
% |
High Voltage |
|
2,677 |
|
2,750 |
|
-2.7 |
% |
Total |
|
4,188 |
|
4,174 |
|
0.3 |
% |
of which: access clients |
|
551 |
|
536 |
|
2.8 |
% |
Gas |
|
1H2003 |
|
1H2002 |
|
r% |
|
Total |
|
1,080 |
|
914 |
|
18.2 |
% |
of which: access clients |
|
258 |
|
171 |
|
50.6 |
% |
# of Customers
Electricity |
|
1H2003 |
|
1H2002 |
|
r% |
|
Low Voltage |
|
555,355 |
|
541,632 |
|
2.5 |
% |
Medium Voltage |
|
687 |
|
624 |
|
10.1 |
% |
High Voltage |
|
20 |
|
19 |
|
5.3 |
% |
Total |
|
556,062 |
|
542,275 |
|
2.5 |
% |
of which: access clients |
|
990 |
|
518 |
|
91.1 |
% |
Gas |
|
1H2003 |
|
1H2002 |
|
r% |
|
Total |
|
162,007 |
|
140,443 |
|
15.4 |
% |
of which: access clients |
|
46 |
|
10 |
|
360.0 |
% |
Revenues - m
Electricity |
|
1H2003 |
|
1H2002 |
|
r% |
|
Transmission tariff |
|
3.1 |
|
1.7 |
|
85.2 |
% |
Distribution tariff |
|
45.3 |
|
44.8 |
|
1.1 |
% |
Commercialisation tariff |
|
3.8 |
|
3.6 |
|
5.8 |
% |
Regulated revenues |
|
52.2 |
|
50.1 |
|
4.3 |
% |
Gas |
|
1H2003 |
|
1H2002 |
|
r% |
|
Transport tariff |
|
1.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
Distribution tariff |
|
15.8 |
|
10.0 |
|
57.8 |
% |
Commercialisation tariff |
|
1.7 |
|
1.2 |
|
43.3 |
% |
Regulated revenues |
|
18.8 |
|
11.2 |
|
68 |
% |
Supply
Energy Sales - GWh
Electricity |
|
1H2003 |
|
1H2002 |
|
r% |
|
Asturias |
|
534 |
|
377 |
|
41.7 |
% |
Rest of Spain |
|
1,634 |
|
1,528 |
|
6.9 |
% |
Total |
|
2,168 |
|
1,905 |
|
13.8 |
% |
Gas |
|
1H2003 |
|
1H2002 |
|
r% |
|
Asturias |
|
179 |
|
63 |
|
183 |
% |
Rest of Spain |
|
1,314 |
|
559 |
|
135 |
% |
Total |
|
1,493 |
|
622 |
|
140 |
% |
# of Customers
Electricity |
|
1H2003 |
|
1H2002 |
|
r% |
|
Asturias |
|
872 |
|
470 |
|
85.6 |
% |
Rest of Spain |
|
1,742 |
|
1,874 |
|
-7.1 |
% |
Total |
|
2,614 |
|
2,344 |
|
11.5 |
% |
Gas |
|
1H2003 |
|
1H2002 |
|
r% |
|
Asturias |
|
27 |
|
6 |
|
344 |
% |
Rest of Spain |
|
81 |
|
72 |
|
13 |
% |
Total |
|
108 |
|
78 |
|
38 |
% |
Revenues - m
Electricity |
|
1H2003 |
|
1H2002 |
|
r% |
|
Asturias |
|
30.0 |
|
25.6 |
|
17.5 |
% |
Rest of Spain |
|
90.3 |
|
75.4 |
|
19.7 |
% |
Sales |
|
120.3 |
|
101.0 |
|
19.1 |
% |
Gas |
|
1H2003 |
|
1H2002 |
|
r% |
|
Asturias |
|
2.8 |
|
0.9 |
|
216 |
% |
Rest of Spain |
|
20.2 |
|
8.0 |
|
151 |
% |
Sales |
|
23.0 |
|
8.9 |
|
157 |
% |
Electricity Distribution: Of the 4,188 GWh distributed by Hidrocantábrico in the 1H2003, 64% was sold to industrial clients. According to the prevailing regulation for the Spanish electricity sector, Hidrocantábricos allowed (or regulated) revenues for the electricity distribution activity amounted to 52.2 million.
Gas Distribution: Total gas distributed by Hidrocantábrico increased 18.2% in comparison with the 1H2002, explained by i) the inclusion of Gas Figueres in the 2H2002, which contributed with 69 GWh in the 1H2003; and ii) the harsh winter in the beginning of this year. In terms of regulated revenues, the 1H2003 is not directly comparable with the 1H2002 since the new regulation, implying an asset base return, was implemented in February 2002.
Electricity Supply: The electricity supply activity has benefited from the liberalization for all customers as of January 2003 and the growth in electricity demand of 6.5% (or 4.7% excluding exports). In this activity, the company was able to increase its average sale price from 53.0/MWh in the 1H2002 to 55.5/MWh in the 1H2003. Hidrocantábricos market share in the liberalized market in this period was 6.5%.
Gas Supply: The gas supply activity has benefited from the increased liberalization of the Spanish gas market, which, along with the electricity market, is open to all customers since January 2003. The strong year-on-year growth in the gas supply business is explained by the fact that Hidrocantábrico initiated this activity at the beginning of 2002.
13
Hidrocantábrico (100%)
Business Areas |
|
Generation & Supply |
|
Electricity Distribution |
|
Gas Distribution (1) |
|
Special Regime |
|
||||||||||||||||
Breakdown |
|
1H2003 |
|
1H2002 |
|
r% |
|
1H2003 |
|
1H2002 |
|
r% |
|
1H2003 |
|
1H2002 |
|
r% |
|
1H2003 |
|
1H2002 |
|
r% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues |
|
414.5 |
|
443.8 |
|
-6.6 |
% |
197.5 |
|
266.0 |
|
-25.7 |
% |
32.3 |
|
32.1 |
|
0.6 |
% |
15.5 |
|
25.0 |
|
-37.9 |
% |
Direct Costs |
|
263.1 |
|
265.1 |
|
-0.7 |
% |
143.4 |
|
210.9 |
|
-32.0 |
% |
14.1 |
|
13.3 |
|
6.4 |
% |
9.9 |
|
23.7 |
|
-58.0 |
% |
Gross Profit |
|
151.3 |
|
178.7 |
|
-15.3 |
% |
54.1 |
|
55.0 |
|
-1.7 |
% |
18.2 |
|
18.8 |
|
-3.4 |
% |
5.6 |
|
1.3 |
|
336 |
% |
Gross Profit/Revenues |
|
36.5 |
% |
40.3 |
% |
-3.8 |
p.p. |
27.4 |
% |
20.7 |
% |
6.7 |
p.p. |
56.3 |
% |
58.6 |
% |
-2.4 |
p.p. |
35.9 |
% |
5.1 |
% |
30.8 |
p.p. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Personnel Costs |
|
17.2 |
|
16.8 |
|
2.4 |
% |
11.1 |
|
11.3 |
|
-2.0 |
% |
1.5 |
|
1.1 |
|
40.0 |
% |
2.3 |
|
2.5 |
|
-8.1 |
% |
Other Operating Costs (net) |
|
15.3 |
|
6.3 |
|
142.2 |
% |
10.2 |
|
9.6 |
|
5.8 |
% |
2.0 |
|
1.4 |
|
42.3 |
% |
(0.6 |
) |
(4.8 |
) |
87 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EBITDA |
|
118.8 |
|
155.6 |
|
-23.6 |
% |
32.8 |
|
34.1 |
|
-3.8 |
% |
14.7 |
|
16.4 |
|
-10.2 |
% |
3.9 |
|
3.6 |
|
8.5 |
% |
EBITDA/Revenues |
|
28.7 |
% |
35.1 |
% |
-6.4 |
p.p. |
16.6 |
% |
12.8 |
% |
3.8 |
p.p. |
45.5 |
% |
51.0 |
% |
-5.5 |
p.p. |
25.0 |
% |
14.3 |
% |
10.7 |
p.p. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation |
|
46.4 |
|
40.5 |
|
14.8 |
% |
14.2 |
|
13.4 |
|
5.4 |
% |
4.9 |
|
4.4 |
|
11.8 |
% |
2.8 |
|
2.2 |
|
27 |
% |
Provision |
|
0.7 |
|
0.0 |
|
|
|
0.4 |
|
0.0 |
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
(0.0 |
) |
|
|
0.4 |
|
4.8 |
|
-92 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EBIT |
|
71.7 |
|
115.1 |
|
-37.7 |
% |
18.2 |
|
20.7 |
|
-11.7 |
% |
9.8 |
|
12.0 |
|
-18.5 |
% |
0.7 |
|
(3.4 |
) |
|
|
EBIT/Revenues |
|
17.3 |
% |
25.9 |
% |
-8.6 |
p.p. |
9.2 |
% |
7.8 |
% |
1.5 |
p.p. |
30.3 |
% |
37.4 |
% |
-7.1 |
p.p. |
4.4 |
% |
-13.6 |
% |
18.0 |
p.p. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
# of employees |
|
581 |
|
575 |
|
1.0 |
% |
395 |
|
385 |
|
2.6 |
% |
65 |
|
58 |
|
12.1 |
% |
130 |
|
151 |
|
-13.9 |
% |
Activities EBITDA 1H2003 (2)
Generation & Supply: The electricity generation and supply activity, which accounts for 70% of Hidrocantábricoss operating cash-flow, posted a 23.6% decline at the EBITDA level due to the reduction of Hidrocantábricos net emission and low pool prices experienced during the period. Nevertheless, the low sale price achieved by the generation activity was partially offset by lower energy purchase costs (pool price) at the supply activity. Also noteworthy, in the 1H2003 CTCs of 11.7 million versus negative 16.2 million in the 1H2002 were booked in the net sales item of the generation activity. Sales from the generation activity also include the tariff deficit of the years 2000, 2001 and 2002, which is being received through tariffs until 2010 (4.6 million in the 1H2003) The increase in operating costs vis-à-vis 1H2002 is due to: i) maintenance work at Aboño I in the 1Q2003 (1.2 million); ii) the start of Castejón CCGT operations in October 2002; and iii) the lower capitalized expenses during the 1H2003 following the conclusion of Castejón CCGT in September 2002 (3.0 million in the 1H2002 versus 0.2 million in the 1H2003).
Electricity Distribution: The prevailing regulation for the Spanish electricity distribution provides this activity with a stable EBITDA. The slight decrease of the EBITDA in the 1H2003 continues to reflect the expansion of this business outside Asturias.
Gas Distribution: The 1H2003 gross profit is not directly comparable with the 1H2002 due to a new regulation since February 2002. Operating costs increased mostly due to higher intra-group costs and to the inclusion of Gas Figueres in the 2H2002.
Special Regime: In the 1H2003, the results are not directly comparable with the 1H2002. Nevertheless, in terms of energy generated in the 1H2003 the net emission of Hidrocantábricos special regime generators increased 27% to 94 GWh. The start of operations of two wind farms with a combined capacity of around 100 MW (65 MW in August and 34 MW in October) will benefit the EBITDA of special regime operations during 2003 and increase its net emission.
(1) In the 1H2003, Hidrocantábrico did not consolidate Naturcorp.
(2) Holding costs not included.
14
Investment ( m) |
|
1H2003 |
|
1H2002 |
|
r% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Generation |
|
8.2 |
|
40.4 |
|
-79.8 |
% |
Electricity distribution |
|
20.2 |
|
24.4 |
|
-17.2 |
% |
Supply |
|
4.6 |
|
1.3 |
|
251.1 |
% |
Gas distribution |
|
8.7 |
|
10.5 |
|
-16.6 |
% |
Special Regime |
|
32.6 |
|
1.2 |
|
|
|
Other |
|
8.7 |
|
0.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating investment |
|
83.1 |
|
78.2 |
|
6.2 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recurring investment |
|
39.3 |
|
32.9 |
|
19.4 |
% |
Non-recurring investment |
|
43.8 |
|
45.3 |
|
-3.3 |
% |
1H2003 - Investment Breakdown
Financial Results ( m) |
|
1H2003 |
|
1H2002 |
|
r% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest receivable / (payable) |
|
(43.1 |
) |
(27.9 |
) |
-54.4 |
% |
Gains / (losses) in group and associated companies |
|
2.3 |
|
1.5 |
|
54.1 |
% |
Goodwill amortization |
|
(30.9 |
) |
(30.8 |
) |
-0.5 |
% |
Other gains / (losses) |
|
(0.7 |
) |
0.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial Results |
|
(72.5 |
) |
(56.5 |
) |
-28.2 |
% |
Goodwill Amortization ( m) |
|
1H2003 |
|
1H2002 |
|
r% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Merger Goodwill |
|
23.3 |
|
23.2 |
|
0.6 |
% |
Gas Asturias |
|
4.9 |
|
4.9 |
|
0.0 |
% |
REE |
|
1.4 |
|
1.6 |
|
-11.7 |
% |
Other |
|
1.3 |
|
1.1 |
|
20.2 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
30.9 |
|
30.8 |
|
0.5 |
% |
Extraordinary Results ( m) |
|
1H2003 |
|
1H2002 |
|
r% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed assets gains / (losses) |
|
2.5 |
|
(0.2 |
) |
|
|
Prior year adjustment (net) |
|
(0.8 |
) |
(2.8 |
) |
69 |
% |
Other gains / (losses) |
|
4.2 |
|
(18.6 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Extraordinary Results |
|
5.8 |
|
(21.5 |
) |
|
|
Although the generation activitys capex decreased substantially with the conclusion of the Castejón CCGT in September 2002, total capex increased 6.2% to 83.1 million. This increase is mostly driven by the construction of wind farms foreseen in Hidrocantábricos business plan, namely the construction of the 65 MW Parques Eólicos del Cantábrico and 34 MW Parques Eólicos Arlanzón (Burgos) wind farms. At the electricity distribution activity, 5.2 million were invested in the expansion of the distribution network outside Asturias. Investments in the commercialisation activity increased following the implementation of a customer information system (4.4 million).
Hidrocantábricos financial results worsen by 28% due to a sharp increase in interest payable, explained by the fact that Adygesinvals loan (1,080 million) to acquire Hidrocantábrico was contracted in July 2002.
The merger goodwill reported in the final 2002 accounts was adjusted for the valuation of Gas de Asturias. This resulted in an uplift in value of 195.6 million, therefore reducing the post revaluation goodwill from 1,122 million to 930 million (see 2002 Financial Results Press Release)
Extraordinary results include a capital gain of 1.0 million from the sale of a 7% stake in REE (Hidrocantábrico currently holds 3% of REE). The proceeds from this operation were 103 million.
15
Income Statement ( m) |
|
1H2003 |
|
1H2002 |
|
r% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues |
|
700.3 |
|
761.2 |
|
-8.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Direct Costs |
|
469.8 |
|
506.8 |
|
-7.3 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross Profit |
|
230.5 |
|
254.5 |
|
-9.4 |
% |
Gross Profit/Revenues |
|
32.9 |
% |
33.4 |
% |
-0.5 |
p.p. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplies and services |
|
36.4 |
|
28.8 |
|
26.4 |
% |
Personnel costs |
|
42.0 |
|
39.8 |
|
5.5 |
% |
Other operating costs (or revenues) |
|
2.8 |
|
3.5 |
|
-19.9 |
% |
Own work capitalised |
|
(5.3 |
) |
(13.8 |
) |
61.4 |
% |
Operating Costs |
|
75.8 |
|
58.2 |
|
30.3 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EBITDA |
|
154.7 |
|
196.2 |
|
-21.2 |
% |
EBITDA/Revenues |
|
22.1 |
% |
25.8 |
% |
-3.7 |
p.p. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation |
|
69.7 |
|
61.9 |
|
12.5 |
% |
Provision |
|
1.5 |
|
5.5 |
|
-72.9 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EBIT |
|
83.6 |
|
128.8 |
|
-35.1 |
% |
EBIT/Revenues |
|
11.9 |
% |
16.9 |
% |
-5.0 |
p.p. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial income and gains |
|
7.6 |
|
8.1 |
|
-5.8 |
% |
Financial expenses and losses |
|
80.1 |
|
64.6 |
|
24.0 |
% |
Financial Results |
|
(72.5 |
) |
(56.5 |
) |
-28.2 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Extraordinary income and gains |
|
10.5 |
|
2.8 |
|
269.2 |
% |
Extraordinary expenses and losses |
|
4.7 |
|
24.4 |
|
-80.8 |
% |
Extraordinary Results |
|
5.8 |
|
(21.5 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income Before Taxes |
|
16.9 |
|
50.8 |
|
-66.6 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income taxes |
|
(15.4 |
) |
21.4 |
|
|
|
Minority interests |
|
1.9 |
|
(1.5 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Profit |
|
30.4 |
|
30.9 |
|
-1.5 |
% |
Number of employees |
|
1H2003 |
|
1H2002 |
|
r% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of employees |
|
1,383 |
|
1,346 |
|
2.7 |
% |
Consolidated EBITDA in the 1H2003 was mainly affected by:
i) the decline in generation revenues due to the high hydro levels and low pool prices experienced during the period;
ii) the increase in supplies and services as a result of the start of Castejón CCGT operations in October 2002 and the maintenance works at Aboño I;
iii) lower capitalized expenses in the period with the conclusion of the construction of Castejón CCGT.
Depreciations increased 12.5% mainly explained by the inclusion of Castejón CCGTs depreciation since October 2002 (the 180 million investment in Castejón is being depreciated over 25 years).
The 2Q2003 results were lower than the first quarter due to: i) the tax benefit (25 million) on the investment made in Castejón CCGT that was booked in the 1Q2003; and ii) the extraordinary results that in the 1Q2003 were higher because of gains in property sales and the definitive liquidation of the regulated electricity distribution revenues of the year 2000.
Note: Hidrocantábrico was proportionally consolidated in accordance with EDPs stake in Hidrocantábrico (40%).
16
Energy Sales (GWh) |
|
1H2003 |
|
1H2002 |
|
r% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Energy contracted |
|
5,463 |
|
6,771 |
|
-19.3 |
% |
Energy purchases on MAE (wholesale market) |
|
139 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total energy purchases |
|
5,602 |
|
6,771 |
|
-17.3 |
% |
Contract losses |
|
(61 |
) |
(474 |
) |
-87.1 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Transmission losses |
|
(160 |
) |
(154 |
) |
3.9 |
% |
Energy delivered to distribution |
|
5,381 |
|
6,143 |
|
-12.4 |
% |
Distribution losses |
|
(550 |
) |
(468 |
) |
17.5 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Energy sales to MAE (wholesale market) |
|
24 |
|
664 |
|
-96.4 |
% |
Residential |
|
1,079 |
|
1,053 |
|
2.5 |
% |
Industrial |
|
2,623 |
|
2,952 |
|
-11.2 |
% |
Commercial |
|
605 |
|
563 |
|
7.5 |
% |
Other |
|
501 |
|
443 |
|
13.0 |
% |
Energy sales to final customers |
|
4,807 |
|
5,011 |
|
-4.1 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total energy sales |
|
4,831 |
|
5,675 |
|
-14.9 |
% |
Gross profit (R$m) |
|
1H2003 |
|
1H2002 |
|
r% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Energy acquisition |
|
480.2 |
|
442.4 |
|
8.6 |
% |
Other direct activity costs |
|
127.7 |
|
139.3 |
|
-8.3 |
% |
Total direct activity costs |
|
607.9 |
|
581.7 |
|
4.5 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Electricity sales to MAE (wholesale market) |
|
5.8 |
|
58.7 |
|
-90.1 |
% |
Residential |
|
298.1 |
|
201.0 |
|
48.3 |
% |
Industrial |
|
365.9 |
|
332.2 |
|
10.1 |
% |
Commercial |
|
142.4 |
|
112.6 |
|
26.5 |
% |
Other |
|
79.5 |
|
61.9 |
|
28.6 |
% |
Electricity sales to final customers |
|
886.0 |
|
707.7 |
|
25.2 |
% |
Total electricity sales |
|
891.8 |
|
766.4 |
|
16.4 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Regulatory tariff reposition |
|
(48.7 |
) |
(36.8 |
) |
-32.2 |
% |
Other revenues & taxes |
|
(43.7 |
) |
26.8 |
|
|
|
Total revenues |
|
799.4 |
|
756.4 |
|
5.7 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit |
|
191.5 |
|
174.8 |
|
9.6 |
% |
The Brazilian Electricity distribution companies are reducing their exposure to contratos iniciais (take-or-pay contracts with generators) in 2003-2006. In 2003 these contracts were reduced by 25% leading to a decrease of 19.3% in Bandeirantes total energy contracted in the 1H2003. This reduction had a positive impact on profitability, as the surplus energy contracted last year was sold at very low prices in the wholesale market (MAE).
Since January 2003, Eletrobrás is responsible for Itaipús contract losses (difference between each distribution companys quota of Itaipús energy output and the true energy delivered). The distribution companies still pay for the losses on Itaipús transmission grid, which is the amount reflected in 2003 under the contract losses item.
Energy sales to final customers declined 4.1% as some industrial clients switched to the free market (these industrial consumers represented some 490 GWh). Nevertheless, the clients that switch to the free market continue to pay for the use of the distribution grid, which is being accounted for as other revenues & taxes. Excluding industrial clients, energy sales increased 6.1%, reflecting the steady recovery of the consumption following the rationing programme.
Revenues from electricity sales to final customers amounted to R$886.0 million, increasing 25.2% as a result of: i) the 19.09% yearly tariff adjustment in October 2002; ii) an improvement in the client mix (increase of the residential and commercial segments weight); and iii) the criteria change in the low-income customers that as of June 2002 are billed for their consumptions as regular consumers. The average tariff to final clients increased from R$141.2/MWh in the 1H2002 to R$184.3/MWh in the 1H2003 (net of value added taxes).
Although energy contracted from contratos iniciais has decreased 25%, energy acquisition costs increased by 8.6%. This is explained by higher unit costs from Itaipús USD-indexed acquisitions and also due to the adjustment in contratos iniciais average tariff (both costs are a pass-through to the final tariff). Other direct activity costs decreased 8.3% explained by a non-recurring cost accounted in the 1H2002 (12.5 million that were pass to generators, with a matching entry on the other revenues & taxes item).
17
Income Statement (1) |
|
R$ million |
|
million |
|
||||||||
|
|
1H2003 |
|
1H2002 |
|
r% |
|
1H2003 |
|
1H2002 |
|
r% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues |
|
799.4 |
|
756.4 |
|
5.7 |
% |
226.6 |
|
345.4 |
|
-34.4 |
% |
Direct Activity Costs |
|
607.9 |
|
581.7 |
|
4.5 |
% |
171.7 |
|
265.2 |
|
-35.2 |
% |
Gross Profit |
|
191.5 |
|
174.8 |
|
9.6 |
% |
54.8 |
|
80.2 |
|
-31.7 |
% |
Gross Profit/Revenues |
|
24.0 |
% |
23.1 |
% |
0.9 |
p.p. |
24.2 |
% |
23.2 |
% |
1.0 |
p.p. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sundry materials & goods for resale |
|
3.6 |
|
4.0 |
|
-10.5 |
% |
1.0 |
|
1.9 |
|
-45.4 |
% |
Supplies and services |
|
39.1 |
|
32.1 |
|
22.0 |
% |
11.1 |
|
14.6 |
|
-24.0 |
% |
Personnel costs |
|
41.9 |
|
40.1 |
|
4.4 |
% |
11.9 |
|
18.1 |
|
-34.5 |
% |
Other operating costs (or revenues) |
|
(3.0 |
) |
6.1 |
|
|
|
(0.8 |
) |
2.8 |
|
|
|
Own work capitalised |
|
(0.8 |
) |
(1.2 |
) |
27.4 |
% |
(0.2 |
) |
(0.5 |
) |
56.7 |
% |
Operating Costs |
|
80.8 |
|
81.2 |
|
-0.5 |
% |
22.9 |
|
36.8 |
|
-37.7 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EBITDA |
|
110.8 |
|
93.6 |
|
18.3 |
% |
31.9 |
|
43.4 |
|
-26.5 |
% |
EBITDA/Revenues |
|
13.9 |
% |
12.4 |
% |
1.5 |
p.p. |
14.1 |
% |
12.6 |
% |
1.5 |
p.p. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation |
|
56.5 |
|
56.2 |
|
0.5 |
% |
16.0 |
|
25.4 |
|
-37.2 |
% |
Provision |
|
7.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
2.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EBIT |
|
46.4 |
|
37.4 |
|
23.9 |
% |
13.8 |
|
18.0 |
|
-23.2 |
% |
EBIT/Revenues |
|
5.8 |
% |
4.9 |
% |
0.9 |
p.p. |
6.1 |
% |
5.2 |
% |
0.9 |
p.p. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial Results |
|
(54.7 |
) |
(20.8 |
) |
-162.8 |
% |
(14.9 |
) |
(11.0 |
) |
-35.6 |
% |
Extraordinary Results |
|
(6.1 |
) |
(16.5 |
) |
63.1 |
% |
(1.7 |
) |
(7.6 |
) |
77.6 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income Before Taxes |
|
(14.4 |
) |
0.1 |
|
|
|
(2.7 |
) |
(0.6 |
) |
-371.8 |
% |
Income taxes |
|
(6.0 |
) |
10.9 |
|
|
|
(1.4 |
) |
1.1 |
|
|
|
Net Profit |
|
(8.4 |
) |
(10.8 |
) |
22.0 |
% |
(1.4 |
) |
(1.7 |
) |
20.0 |
% |
(1) Important note: the income statement presented above does not correspond to the statutory accounts of Bandeirante, being only taken for consolidation purposes in EDP Group.
EBITDA increased 18.3% vis-à-vis the 1H2002 reflecting the improvement of the companys gross margin and a decline in operating costs of 0.5%. Supplies and services increased by 22.0% due to inflation pressures in the last 12 months (IGP-M price index increased 28.24%). It is important to note that the other operating costs item includes, since 2003, a federal tax credit (R$11.9 million).
Financial results were adversely affected by financing contracts linked to the IGP-M price index. However, the 0.35% decline of this index in the 2Q2003, allowed Bandeirante to improve its financial results on a quarterly basis from a loss of R$44.0 million in the 1Q2003 to a loss of R$10.7 million in the 2Q2003. It is worth to mention that due to a better second quarter in terms of EBITDA and Financial Results, Bandeirante posted R$17.7 million of Net Income in the 2Q2003.
Financial Debt (R$ m) |
|
1H2003 |
|
YE2002(3) |
|
r% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EDP Brasil S.A. (Group) |
|
300.1 |
|
382.2 |
|
-21.5 |
% |
BNDES |
|
252.6 |
|
272.0 |
|
-7.1 |
% |
Others |
|
210.5 |
|
159.4 |
|
32.1 |
% |
Local currency |
|
763.2 |
|
813.5 |
|
-6.2 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dollar Denominated Debt |
|
44.6 |
|
51.9 |
|
-14.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Financial Debt |
|
807.8 |
|
865.4 |
|
-6.7 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asset to Recover (2) |
|
315.8 |
|
322.4 |
|
-2.0 |
% |
(2) rationing losses and Parcela A; (3) YE2002 debt includes R$5.4 million of interests; 1H2003 interests are included at accruals and defferals
Investment (R$ m) |
|
1H2003 |
|
1H2002 |
|
r% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recurring investments |
|
33.0 |
|
31.8 |
|
3.5 |
% |
Non-recurring investments (4) |
|
24.2 |
|
2.5 |
|
887.3 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Operating Investments |
|
57.2 |
|
34.3 |
|
66.8 |
% |
(4) modernization programme on the distribution grid
Number of employees |
|
1H2003 |
|
1H2002 |
|
r% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of employees |
|
1,360 |
|
1,383 |
|
-1.7 |
% |
18
Energy Sales (GWh) |
|
1H2003 |
|
1H2002 |
|
r% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Energy contracted |
|
2,953 |
|
3,467 |
|
-14.8 |
% |
Self generation |
|
600 |
|
586 |
|
2.4 |
% |
Energy purchases on MAE (wholesale market) |
|
71 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total energy purchases |
|
3,624 |
|
4,053 |
|
-10.6 |
% |
Contract losses |
|
(69 |
) |
(187 |
) |
-63.1 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Transmission losses |
|
(102 |
) |
(99 |
) |
3.0 |
% |
Energy delivered to distribution |
|
3,453 |
|
3,767 |
|
-8.3 |
% |
Distribution losses |
|
(481 |
) |
(398 |
) |
20.9 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Energy sales to MAE (wholesale market) |
|
15 |
|
310 |
|
-95.2 |
% |
Residential |
|
636 |
|
574 |
|
10.8 |
% |
Industrial |
|
1,335 |
|
1,534 |
|
-13.0 |
% |
Commercial |
|
394 |
|
422 |
|
-6.6 |
% |
Other |
|
592 |
|
529 |
|
11.9 |
% |
Energy sales to final customers |
|
2,957 |
|
3,059 |
|
-3.3 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total energy sales |
|
2,972 |
|
3,369 |
|
-11.8 |
% |
Gross profit (R$ m) |
|
1H2003 |
|
1H2002 |
|
r% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Energy acquisition |
|
204.0 |
|
194.2 |
|
5.1 |
% |
Other direct activity costs |
|
61.9 |
|
56.9 |
|
8.9 |
% |
Total direct activity costs |
|
265.9 |
|
251.0 |
|
5.9 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Electricity sales to MAE (wholesale market) |
|
(0.1 |
) |
19.0 |
|
|
|
Residential |
|
161.9 |
|
124.0 |
|
30.6 |
% |
Industrial |
|
144.3 |
|
142.1 |
|
1.5 |
% |
Commercial |
|
85.6 |
|
72.8 |
|
17.6 |
% |
Other |
|
77.4 |
|
53.6 |
|
44.3 |
% |
Electricity sales to final customers |
|
469.2 |
|
392.5 |
|
19.5 |
% |
Total electricity sales |
|
469.1 |
|
411.5 |
|
14.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Regulatory tariff reposition |
|
(22.1 |
) |
(22.5 |
) |
1.9 |
% |
Other revenues & taxes |
|
(4.2 |
) |
(17.7 |
) |
76.3 |
% |
Total revenues |
|
442.9 |
|
371.3 |
|
19.3 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit |
|
176.9 |
|
120.3 |
|
47.1 |
% |
Escelsa benefited from the 25% termination of the contratos iniciais which led to a decrease of 10.9% in total energy contracted. The change in Itaipús contract also had a positive impact on Escelsas profitability.
Energy sales to final customers declined 3.3% as some industrial clients switched to the free market (these industrial consumers represented some 360 GWh). Nevertheless, the company continues to receive the bulk of the revenue as the clients that have switched to the free market still pay for the use of the distribution grid. Excluding industrial clients, energy sales increased 6.4%, reflecting the steady recovery of the consumption following the rationing programme.
Revenues from electricity sales to final costumers increased 19.5% to R$469.2 million, mostly explained by: i) the 15.97% yearly tariff adjustment in August 2002; and ii) the improvement in the client mix (increase of the residential and commercial segments weight). The average tariff to final customers increased from R$128.3/MWh in the 1H2002 to R$158.7/MWh in the 1H2003 (net of value added taxes).
Although energy contracted from contratos iniciais has decreased 25%, direct activity costs increased by 5.9% as a result of higher costs from Itaipús USD-indexed acquisitions, the annual adjustments in contractos iniciais and a rise in the transmission cost.
In Escelsas last yearly tariff adjustment on August 6th, 2003, ANEEL granted an average tariff increase of 17.30%:
i) 8.96% is related to the pass through of the non-controllable costs to the final tariff;
ii) 7.80% is related to the adjustment of controllable costs to the IGP-M inflation index (25.24% net of 1.89% X Factor); and
iii) 0.54% is related to costs incurred during the rationing programme.
19
|
|
R$ million |
|
million |
|
||||||||
Income Statement |
|
1H2003 |
|
1H2002 |
|
r% |
|
1H2003 |
|
1H2002 |
|
r% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues |
|
442.9 |
|
371.3 |
|
19.3 |
% |
124.7 |
|
172.7 |
|
-27.8 |
% |
Direct Activity Costs |
|
265.9 |
|
251.0 |
|
5.9 |
% |
75.2 |
|
114.0 |
|
-34.0 |
% |
Gross Profit |
|
176.9 |
|
120.3 |
|
47.1 |
% |
49.5 |
|
58.7 |
|
-15.7 |
% |
Gross Profit/Revenues |
|
40.0 |
% |
32.4 |
% |
7.6 |
p.p. |
39.7 |
% |
34.0 |
% |
5.7 |
p.p. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sundry materials & goods for resale |
|
3.6 |
|
3.2 |
|
12.2 |
% |
1.0 |
|
1.5 |
|
-30.0 |
% |
Supplies and services |
|
27.3 |
|
23.1 |
|
18.1 |
% |
7.8 |
|
10.4 |
|
-25.2 |
% |
Personnel costs |
|
33.2 |
|
29.7 |
|
11.9 |
% |
9.4 |
|
13.4 |
|
-29.6 |
% |
Other operating costs (or revenues) |
|
2.7 |
|
3.2 |
|
-14.7 |
% |
0.8 |
|
1.4 |
|
-46.4 |
% |
Own work capitalised |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating Costs |
|
66.9 |
|
59.2 |
|
13.0 |
% |
19.0 |
|
26.6 |
|
-28.8 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EBITDA |
|
110.1 |
|
61.1 |
|
80.1 |
% |
30.6 |
|
32.1 |
|
-4.8 |
% |
EBITDA/Revenues |
|
24.9 |
% |
16.5 |
% |
8.4 |
p.p. |
24.5 |
% |
18.6 |
% |
5.9 |
p.p. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation |
|
29.3 |
|
28.3 |
|
3.5 |
% |
8.3 |
|
12.8 |
|
-35.3 |
% |
Provision |
|
22.1 |
|
7.9 |
|
180.8 |
% |
6.6 |
|
4.9 |
|
33.1 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EBIT |
|
58.6 |
|
24.9 |
|
135.4 |
% |
15.7 |
|
14.3 |
|
9.4 |
% |
EBIT/Revenues |
|
13.2 |
% |
6.7 |
% |
6.5 |
p.p. |
12.6 |
% |
8.3 |
% |
4.3 |
p.p. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial Results |
|
154.8 |
|
(273.5 |
) |
|
|
48.1 |
|
(105.7 |
) |
|
|
Extraordinary Results |
|
73.3 |
|
(3.1 |
) |
|
|
21.1 |
|
(1.5 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income Before Taxes |
|
286.7 |
|
(251.7 |
) |
|
|
84.9 |
|
(92.8 |
) |
|
|
Income taxes |
|
103.4 |
|
(77.3 |
) |
|
|
30.6 |
|
(28.6 |
) |
|
|
Net Profit |
|
183.3 |
|
(174.4 |
) |
|
|
54.3 |
|
(64.3 |
) |
|
|
The EBITDA margin increased from 16.5% to 24.9% despite the 13.0% year- on- year increase in operating costs, mainly due to the tariff increase vis-à-vis the 1H2002 and also due to a better contractual framework. In addition to inflation pressures, supplies and services increased 18.1% as a result of costs incurred with energy conservation programmes and software fees. Personnel costs increased 11.9% explained by lower capitalized costs in the 1H2003 and also due to the annual salary increase. Provisions increased by R$14.2 million due to the creation of a generic provision associated with fiscal liabilities.
Financial results had a marked improvement due to the effect of the Reals appreciation on the dollar denominated debt. Net foreign exchange differences were positive in R$223.3 million. Escelsa was able to revert a R$75.1 million provision that was related to the potential devaluation of the dollar denominated assets market value (accounted in extraordinary results).
Financial Debt (R$ m) |
|
1H2003 |
|
YE2002 |
|
r% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BNDES |
|
273.5 |
|
333.1 |
|
-17.9 |
% |
Others |
|
38.7 |
|
33.4 |
|
16.1 |
% |
Local currency |
|
312.2 |
|
366.4 |
|
-14.8 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior Notes |
|
1,237.7 |
|
1,592.5 |
|
-22.3 |
% |
Other |
|
94.9 |
|
52.8 |
|
79.7 |
% |
Dollar Denominated Debt |
|
1,332.6 |
|
1,645.3 |
|
-19.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Financial Debt |
|
1,644.8 |
|
2,011.7 |
|
-18.2 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asset to Recover (1) |
|
181.9 |
|
177.5 |
|
2.5 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hedging: Dollar Denominated Asset |
|
239.8 |
|
296.3 |
|
-19.1 |
% |
Investment (R$ m) |
|
1H2003 |
|
1H2002 |
|
r% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recurring investments |
|
23.3 |
|
24.6 |
|
-5.0 |
% |
Non-recurring investments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Operating Investments |
|
23.3 |
|
24.6 |
|
-5.0 |
% |
Number of employees |
|
1H2003 |
|
1H2002 |
|
r% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of employees |
|
1,345 |
|
1,386 |
|
-3.0 |
% |
(1) rationing losses and Parcela A
Important note: the 2002 figures presented in this section are given only for analysis purposes. In 2002 Escelsa was equity consolidated in EDP from January until September and fully consolidated from October until December. EDP controls 54.74% of Escelsa.
20
Energy Sales (GWh) |
|
1H2003 |
|
1H2002 |
|
r% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Energy contracted |
|
1,480 |
|
1,654 |
|
-10.5 |
% |
Self generation |
|
202 |
|
188 |
|
7.9 |
% |
Energy purchases on MAE (wholesale market) |
|
34 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total energy purchases |
|
1,716 |
|
1,842 |
|
-6.8 |
% |
Contract losses |
|
(18 |
) |
(57 |
) |
-68.8 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Transmission losses |
|
(44 |
) |
(45 |
) |
-1.1 |
% |
Energy delivered to distribution |
|
1,654 |
|
1,740 |
|
-4.9 |
% |
Distribution losses |
|
(246 |
) |
(236 |
) |
4.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Energy sales to MAE (wholesale market) |
|
7 |
|
152 |
|
-95.2 |
% |
Residential |
|
447 |
|
428 |
|
4.6 |
% |
Industrial |
|
319 |
|
324 |
|
-1.5 |
% |
Commercial |
|
278 |
|
264 |
|
5.5 |
% |
Other |
|
356 |
|
336 |
|
5.9 |
% |
Energy sales to final customers |
|
1,401 |
|
1,351 |
|
3.7 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total energy sales |
|
1,408 |
|
1,504 |
|
-6.3 |
% |
Gross profit (R$ m) |
|
1H2003 |
|
1H2002 |
|
r% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Energy acquisition |
|
97.5 |
|
82.0 |
|
18.9 |
% |
Other direct activity costs |
|
34.8 |
|
30.1 |
|
15.6 |
% |
Total direct activity costs |
|
132.3 |
|
112.1 |
|
18.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Electricity sales to MAE (wholesale market) |
|
(2.7 |
) |
(20.3 |
) |
86.9 |
% |
Residential |
|
107.4 |
|
85.3 |
|
25.8 |
% |
Industrial |
|
46.8 |
|
37.4 |
|
24.9 |
% |
Commercial |
|
63.5 |
|
50.4 |
|
26.1 |
% |
Other |
|
64.0 |
|
58.3 |
|
9.8 |
% |
Electricity sales to final customers |
|
281.6 |
|
231.4 |
|
21.7 |
% |
Total electricity sales |
|
279.0 |
|
211.2 |
|
32.1 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Regulatory tariff reposition |
|
(13.0 |
) |
(10.3 |
) |
-26.2 |
% |
Other revenues & taxes |
|
(12.9 |
) |
(10.1 |
) |
-27.7 |
% |
Total revenues |
|
253.1 |
|
190.8 |
|
32.6 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit |
|
120.9 |
|
78.8 |
|
53.4 |
% |
In the 1H2003, Enersul, like the other Brazilian distribution companies, benefited from the 25% reduction of the contratos iniciais, which led to a decrease of 10.5% in energy contracted. The change in Itaipús contract also had a positive impact on Enersuls profitability.
Energy sales to final clients increased 3.7% on the back of higher consumption in the residential and commercial segments in the period. Energy sales to industrial clients had a slight decrease of 1.5% as some of these clients switched to the free market in the 1H2003.
Revenues from electricity sales to final customers increased 21.7%, mostly explained by the tariff revision occurred last April 8th. ANEEL granted an average tariff increase of 32.59%, plus 9.67% to be recovered in equal parts during the next four years, which is already being accrued on the electricity sales. Comparing the 1Q2003 with the 2Q2003 Enersuls average tariff increase from R$169.3/MWh to R$233.3/MWh (net of value added taxes), on a quarterly basis.
Although energy contracted from contratos iniciais has decreased 25%, direct activity costs increased by 18.0% has a result of higher costs from Itaipús USD-indexed acquisitions, the tariff adjustment in contratos iniciais and a rise of the transmission cost.
Overall, gross profit increased more than 50% following a tariff revision that enables a more adequate return on the companys asset base.
21
Income Statement |
|
R$ million |
|
million |
|
||||||||
|
|
1H2003 |
|
1H2002 |
|
r% |
|
1H2003 |
|
1H2002 |
|
r% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues |
|
253.1 |
|
190.8 |
|
32.6 |
% |
72.2 |
|
89.1 |
|
-18.9 |
% |
Direct Activity Costs |
|
132.3 |
|
112.1 |
|
18.0 |
% |
37.6 |
|
50.7 |
|
-25.7 |
% |
Gross Profit |
|
120.9 |
|
78.8 |
|
53.4 |
% |
34.6 |
|
38.4 |
|
-9.9 |
% |
Gross Profit/Revenues |
|
47.8 |
% |
41.3 |
% |
6.5 |
p.p. |
47.9 |
% |
43.1 |
% |
4.8 |
p.p. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sundry materials & goods for resale |
|
3.9 |
|
4.4 |
|
-10.5 |
% |
1.1 |
|
2.0 |
|
-43.9 |
% |
Supplies and services |
|
19.4 |
|
14.7 |
|
31.8 |
% |
5.5 |
|
6.6 |
|
-16.1 |
% |
Personnel costs |
|
25.2 |
|
23.4 |
|
7.5 |
% |
7.1 |
|
10.5 |
|
-32.3 |
% |
Other operating costs (or revenues) |
|
1.1 |
|
1.4 |
|
-21.2 |
% |
0.3 |
|
0.6 |
|
-52.1 |
% |
Own work capitalised |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating Costs |
|
49.6 |
|
43.9 |
|
13.0 |
% |
14.1 |
|
19.7 |
|
-28.6 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EBITDA |
|
71.3 |
|
34.9 |
|
104.4 |
% |
20.5 |
|
18.6 |
|
10.0 |
% |
EBITDA/Revenues |
|
28.2 |
% |
18.3 |
% |
9.9 |
p.p. |
28.4 |
% |
20.9 |
% |
7.5 |
p.p. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation |
|
27.6 |
|
25.3 |
|
9.0 |
% |
7.8 |
|
11.4 |
|
-31.6 |
% |
Provision |
|
7.0 |
|
3.0 |
|
132.0 |
% |
2.0 |
|
1.3 |
|
56.6 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EBIT |
|
36.6 |
|
6.5 |
|
462.9 |
% |
10.7 |
|
6.0 |
|
79.8 |
% |
EBIT/Revenues |
|
14.5 |
% |
3.4 |
% |
11.1 |
p.p. |
14.8 |
% |
6.7 |
% |
8.1 |
p.p. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial Results |
|
(12.6 |
) |
(27.2 |
) |
53.7 |
% |
(3.1 |
) |
(11.3 |
) |
72.6 |
% |
Extraordinary Results |
|
(22.9 |
) |
(1.7 |
) |
|
|
(6.9 |
) |
(0.8 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income Before Taxes |
|
1.2 |
|
(22.4 |
) |
|
|
0.7 |
|
(6.2 |
) |
|
|
Income taxes |
|
11.9 |
|
(7.2 |
) |
|
|
3.6 |
|
(1.9 |
) |
|
|
Net Profit |
|
(10.7 |
) |
(15.1 |
) |
29.1 |
% |
(2.9 |
) |
(4.2 |
) |
31.2 |
% |
EBITDA margin increased from 18.3% to 28.2% despite the 13.0% year-on-year increase in operating costs, mainly due to the tariff revision on April 8th and also due to a better contractual framework. In addition to inflation pressures, supplies and services increased 31.8% due to higher expenses related to customer services, and also due to higher software fees. Personnel costs rose 7.5% explained by lower capitalized costs due to a decrease in the operating investment.
Enersul manage to improve the financial results due to the effect of the Reals appreciation in the dollar denominated debt. The extraordinary results took their toll on Net Income as the company decided to make a R$19.8 million adjustment for a provision related to the eventual divestment of a gas turbine at the Campo Grande Thermoelectric Plant. It is important to note that the abnormal effective income tax rate is mostly explained by the fact that extraordinary provisions and some of the operating provisions are not tax deductible.
Financial Debt (R$ m) |
|
1H2003 |
|
YE2002 |
|
r% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Magistra S.A. (Group) |
|
123.9 |
|
66.0 |
|
87.9 |
% |
BNDES |
|
166.4 |
|
157.7 |
|
5.5 |
% |
Others |
|
144.3 |
|
154.1 |
|
-6.4 |
% |
Local currency |
|
434.6 |
|
377.8 |
|
15.1 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dollar Denominated Debt |
|
153.5 |
|
199.4 |
|
-23.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Financial Debt |
|
588.2 |
|
577.2 |
|
1.9 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asset to Recover (1) |
|
120.8 |
|
114.3 |
|
5.6 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hedging: Dollar Denominated Asset |
|
5.7 |
|
6.0 |
|
-3.7 |
% |
Investment (R$ m) |
|
1H2003 |
|
1H2002 |
|
r% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recurring investments |
|
16.8 |
|
29.3 |
|
-42.7 |
% |
Non-recurring investments |
|
|
|
23.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Operating Investments |
|
16.8 |
|
52.4 |
|
-68.0 |
% |
Number of employees |
|
1H2003 |
|
1H2002 |
|
r% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of employees |
|
935 |
|
949 |
|
-1.5 |
% |
(1) rationing losses and Parcela A
Important note: the 2002 figures presented in this section are given only for analysis purposes. In 2002 Enersul was equity consolidated in EDP from January until September and fully consolidated from October until December. EDP controls 35.69% of Enersul.
22
Telecoms - Fixed Line (Portugal & Spain)
|
|
Pro-forma (1) |
|
||||
Operating Revenues ( m) |
|
1H2003 |
|
1H2002 |
|
r% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Voice telecommunications services |
|
107.7 |
|
84.5 |
|
27.4 |
% |
Data telecommunications services |
|
41.3 |
|
40.3 |
|
2.6 |
% |
Other telecommunications income |
|
11.4 |
|
16.2 |
|
-30 |
% |
Revenues from telecommunications services |
|
160.4 |
|
141.0 |
|
13.8 |
% |
Equipment sales |
|
1.3 |
|
7.5 |
|
-82.2 |
% |
Revenues from equipment sales |
|
1.3 |
|
7.5 |
|
-82.2 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating revenues |
|
161.7 |
|
148.4 |
|
9.0 |
% |
Direct Activity Costs ( m) |
|
1H2003 |
|
1H2002 |
|
r% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of telecommunications services |
|
85.5 |
|
73.9 |
|
15.6 |
% |
Cost of equipment sales |
|
1.2 |
|
7.0 |
|
-83.2 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Direct activity costs |
|
86.7 |
|
80.9 |
|
7.1 |
% |
Gross Profit ( m) |
|
1H2003 |
|
1H2002 |
|
r% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit on telecommunications services |
|
74.9 |
|
67.1 |
|
11.7 |
% |
Gross profit on equipment sales |
|
0.2 |
|
0.5 |
|
-68.1 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross Profit |
|
75.1 |
|
67.6 |
|
11.1 |
% |
Oni Spain operating data for the 1H2003 includes OLA Internet contribution (acquired in 2003) and excludes Germinus contribution (object of a selling process)
Operating revenues generated at the fixed line operator rose 9.0%, to 161.7 million in the 1H2003, on the back of a 27.4% growth in proceeds from voice telecommunications services.
Voice services, which accounted for 66.6% of total revenues, benefited from the consolidation of OLA Internet, a recently acquired Spanish telecommunications company that contributed with an additional 18.9 million in voice services revenues. By the end of 1H2003, voice traffic operated by ONI totalled 1,285.2 million minutes, of which 206.9 million minutes were related to OLA Internets activity. The number of equivalent client lines (CLIs) totalled 548.6 thousand, up 8.9% year-on-year.
Excluding OLA Internets contribution, revenues from voice services would have increased by 5.2% and voice traffic would have risen by 34.5%. Much of this growth came from the Operators segment, where much lower prices per minute are charged. On the other hand, margins in this segment are higher.
Proceeds from data services amounted to 41.3 million in the 1H2003, representing 25.8% of telecommunication services revenues. Despite a 28.5% increase in the number of registered Internet accounts, up to 406.0 thousand by the end of 1H2003, ISP traffic fell 6.5%, since ONI encouraged clients to transfer from dial-up access to xDSL access.
Gross margin on telecommunication services fell from 47.6% to 46.7% since direct activity costs increased 15.6% to 85.5 million while revenues were up 13.8%.
(1) Excluding ONI Way contribution
Important Notes: Germinus was consolidated in ONIs 1H2003 Financial Statements through the Equity Method (1,5 million), as it is in the process of being sold.
In view of the shut-down of UMTS operations and for analysis purposes, 1H2002 figures do not include ONI Ways contribution.
23
Operating Income Statement ( m) |
|
ONI PT |
|
ONI Spain |
|
ONI Group |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues from telecommunications services |
|
81.7 |
|
78.7 |
|
160.4 |
|
Revenues from equipment sales |
|
0.6 |
|
0.7 |
|
1.3 |
|
Operating revenues |
|
82.3 |
|
79.4 |
|
161.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of telecommunications services |
|
36.8 |
|
48.7 |
|
85.5 |
|
Cost of equipment sales |
|
0.6 |
|
0.6 |
|
1.2 |
|
Direct activity costs |
|
37.3 |
|
49.3 |
|
86.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross Profit |
|
45.0 |
|
30.1 |
|
75.1 |
|
Gross Profit/Revenues |
|
54.7 |
% |
37.9 |
% |
46.4 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplies and services |
|
29.9 |
|
16.1 |
|
46.6 |
|
Personnel costs |
|
18.0 |
|
11.6 |
|
30.9 |
|
Other operating costs (or revenues) |
|
(0.1 |
) |
0.2 |
|
0.1 |
|
Own work capitalised |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating costs |
|
47.8 |
|
27.9 |
|
77.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EBITDA |
|
(2.8 |
) |
2.1 |
|
(2.5 |
) |
EBITDA/Revenues |
|
-3.4 |
% |
2.7 |
% |
-1.6 |
% |
Balance Sheet ( m) |
|
ONI PT |
|
ONI Spain |
|
ONI Group |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intangible Assets |
|
147.2 |
|
90.2 |
|
305.5 |
|
Fixed Assets |
|
184.6 |
|
48.8 |
|
239.3 |
|
Other Assets |
|
233.5 |
|
76.3 |
|
377.9 |
|
Total Assets |
|
565.3 |
|
215.3 |
|
922.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial debt |
|
238.3 |
|
2.9 |
|
631.3 |
|
Provisions |
|
8.4 |
|
6.8 |
|
33.5 |
|
Other Liabilities |
|
240.6 |
|
186.1 |
|
401.0 |
|
Total Liabilities |
|
487.4 |
|
195.7 |
|
1,065.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Minority interests |
|
0.01 |
|
0.2 |
|
0.2 |
|
Shareholders equity |
|
77.9 |
|
19.4 |
|
(143.3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities & shareholders equity |
|
565.3 |
|
215.3 |
|
922.7 |
|
|
|
Pro-forma (1) |
|
||||
Number of employees |
|
1H2003 |
|
1H2002 |
|
r% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed Line Portugal |
|
616 |
|
762 |
|
-19.2 |
% |
Fixed Line Spain |
|
746 |
|
652 |
|
14.4 |
% |
Total |
|
1,362 |
|
1,414 |
|
-3.7 |
% |
Oni Spain
operating data for the 1H2003 includes OLA Internet contribution (acquired in
2003) and
excludes Germinus contribution (object of a selling process)
Operating revenues at ONI Portugal rose 1.3% to 82.3 million in the 1H2003. This evolution is the result of: (i) a 9.3% increase in revenues from telecommunication services, which was mostly offset by (ii) a significant decrease in revenues from equipment sales, since there was a major contract for equipment supply in 1H2002.
During the 1H2003, the ONI Group decided to sell its stake in Germinus, which was therefore consolidated through the Equity Method in ONIs 1H2003 financial statements (1.5 million).
By the end of the 1H2003, operating revenues at ONI Spain totalled 79.4 million, up 18.3% year-on-year, of which 87.5% came from voice services. Excluding Germinuss contribution last year, operating revenues would have increased by 31.8% on the back of the OLA Internet acquisition.
Data services at ONI Spain, which totalled 7.6 million (or 10.0% of ONI Spain total proceeds), fell by approximately 20% year-on-year, reflecting: (i) a 33.2% decrease in ISP traffic to 16.2 million minutes and (ii) a decrease in rented capacity (52% below 1H2002 figure) following the closure of some clients in the Operators segment.
EBITDA break-even was achieved at ONI Spain in 1H2003 while ONI Portugal was 2.8 million away from achieving this goal. The ONI Group was EBITDA positive in the 2Q2003. The positive impacts of Germinuss Equity consolidation and OLA Internets acquisition totalled 2.7 million at the EBITDA level.
(1) Excluding ONI Way contribution
24
|
|
Pro-forma (1) |
|
||||
Operating Income Statement ( m) |
|
1H2003 |
|
1H2002 |
|
r% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues from telecommunications services |
|
160.4 |
|
141.0 |
|
13.8 |
% |
Revenues from equipment sales |
|
1.3 |
|
7.5 |
|
-82.2 |
% |
Operating revenues |
|
161.7 |
|
148.4 |
|
9.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Direct activity costs |
|
86.7 |
|
80.9 |
|
7.1 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross Profit |
|
75.1 |
|
67.6 |
|
11.1 |
% |
Gross Profit/Revenues |
|
46.4 |
% |
45.5 |
% |
0.9 |
p.p. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplies and services - Group |
|
0.3 |
|
3.4 |
|
-90.3 |
% |
Supplies and services - Non-Group |
|
46.2 |
|
52.8 |
|
-12.5 |
% |
Personnel Costs |
|
30.9 |
|
35.3 |
|
-12.4 |
% |
Other operating costs (or revenues) |
|
0.1 |
|
(0.5 |
) |
|
|
Own work capitalised |
|
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
|
|
Operating costs |
|
77.6 |
|
90.8 |
|
-14.6 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EBITDA |
|
(2.5 |
) |
(23.3 |
) |
89.2 |
% |
EBITDA/Revenues |
|
-1.5 |
% |
-15.7 |
% |
14.1 |
p.p. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortisation |
|
33.6 |
|
26.0 |
|
29.6 |
% |
Provisions |
|
2.2 |
|
5.0 |
|
-55 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EBIT |
|
(38.4 |
) |
(54.2 |
) |
29.2 |
% |
EBIT/Revenues |
|
-23.7 |
% |
-36.5 |
% |
12.8 |
p.p. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial Results |
|
(26.2 |
) |
(21.1 |
) |
-24.5 |
% |
Extrordinary Results |
|
(4.9 |
) |
(5.9 |
) |
16.0 |
% |
EBT |
|
(69.5 |
) |
(81.1 |
) |
14.3 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Taxes and Minorities |
|
(4.9 |
) |
(2.1 |
) |
-136.1 |
% |
Net Income |
|
(64.6 |
) |
(79.1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Pro-forma (1) |
|
||||
Investment ( m) |
|
1H2003 |
|
1H2002 |
|
r% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed line Portugal |
|
7.1 |
|
17.9 |
|
-60.1 |
% |
Recurrent |
|
0.4 |
|
2.9 |
|
-85.2 |
% |
Non-recurring |
|
6.7 |
|
14.9 |
|
-55.2 |
% |
Fixed line Spain |
|
11.2 |
|
11.1 |
|
0.9 |
% |
Recurring |
|
4.7 |
|
1.1 |
|
|
|
Non-recurring |
|
6.5 |
|
9.9 |
|
-34.6 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating investment |
|
18.3 |
|
29.0 |
|
-36.8 |
% |
The cost-cutting program implemented by ONI in late 2001 continues to bear fruit as total operating costs at ONI decreased by 14.6% during the period under analysis.
Supplies and services fell 17.1% to 46.6 million in the 1H2003. Most of the decrease was achieved at ONI Portugal. The major savings were in advertising costs and specialized works (namely IT services and O&M expenditures). Please note that Germinuss Equity Consolidation translated into a 2.6 million decrease in ONIs supplies and services. Nevertheless, this positive impact was offset by the inclusion of OLA Internets contribution (2.6 million).
The 12.4% decrease in personnel costs reflects: (i) the reduction in the number of employees (see page 24); (ii) the equity consolidation of Germinus (-3.2 million) and (iii) the consolidation of OLA Internet (+3.8 million). During the 2Q2003, the company managed to reduce its workforce by 51 employees.
Operating investment totalled 18.3 million, down 36.8% excluding ONI Ways contribution in 1H2002. Investment at ONI Portugal fell since the expansion of the network in the fixed line business and direct access infrastructure was done in 2002. Fixed-line recurring investment at ONI Spain includes 4.1 million related to the acquisition of access equipment.
During the 1H2003, the ONI Group acquired an additional 22.2% stake in ONI Way from Telenor (20%), Efacec (1.0%) and Media Capital (1.2%) for a total of 11.5 million.
(1) Excluding ONI Way contribution
25
Operating Income Statement ( m) |
|
1H2003 |
|
1H2002 |
|
r% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales |
|
13.1 |
|
25.4 |
|
-48.6 |
% |
Services Provided |
|
82.2 |
|
88.4 |
|
-7.0 |
% |
Operating Revenues |
|
95.2 |
|
113.8 |
|
-16.3 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sundry materials and goods for resale |
|
10.9 |
|
15.3 |
|
-29.1 |
% |
Supplies and services - Group |
|
5.5 |
|
12.6 |
|
-56.8 |
% |
Supplies and services - Non-group |
|
29.2 |
|
35.7 |
|
-18.1 |
% |
Personnel Costs |
|
33.4 |
|
39.2 |
|
-14.8 |
% |
Other operating costs (or revenues) |
|
(1.3 |
) |
(0.5 |
) |
-188.1 |
% |
Own work capitalised |
|
(3.6 |
) |
(10.1 |
) |
64.3 |
% |
Operating Costs |
|
74.1 |
|
92.3 |
|
-19.7 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EBITDA |
|
21.1 |
|
21.5 |
|
-1.7 |
% |
EBITDA/Operating Revenues |
|
22.2 |
% |
18.9 |
% |
3.3 |
p.p. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortisation |
|
11.3 |
|
8.9 |
|
27.1 |
% |
Provisions |
|
0.4 |
|
0.2 |
|
141.1 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EBIT |
|
9.5 |
|
12.5 |
|
-23.8 |
% |
EBIT/Operating Revenues |
|
10.0 |
% |
11.0 |
% |
-1.0 |
p.p. |
Number of employees |
|
1H2003 |
|
1H2002 |
|
r% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of Employees |
|
1,757 |
|
1,815 |
|
-3.2 |
% |
Operating revenues at Edinfor totalled 95.2 million, down 16.3% year-on-year, mostly due to: (i) the economic slowdown of the Portuguese economy and (ii) the reallocation to EDP Distribuição of assets related to an IT system which implied a fall in services invoiced by Edinfor to EDP Distribuição.
During the 1H2003, 46.6% of total operating revenues came from sales and services provided to non-EDP Group companies.
The drop in supplies and services is a result of both the economic slowdown and the abovementioned transfer to EDPD.
Personnel costs decreased 14.8% because of: (i) a reduction of 58 employees; (ii) successful wage negotiations and (iii) the on-going restructuring process, which is estimated to provide additional cost-savings until the end of the year.
Despite a 16.3% decrease in Edinfors operating revenues, the companys good operating performance enabled a 3.3 p.p. increase of EBITDA margin to 22.2% in the 1H2003.
The 27.1% increase in depreciation and amortization, which is mostly due to the amortization of assets related to an IT project ISU/Communications that had been accounted for as works in progress and was now transferred to fixed assets, reflected into a 23.8% decrease of EBIT for the 1H2003.
The slow economic environment will continue to impact the company in the 2H2003.
26
Consolidated Financial Results
Financial Results ( m) |
|
1H2003 |
|
1H2002 |
|
r% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from group&assotiated companies |
|
7.2 |
|
(16.4 |
) |
|
|
Investment income |
|
31.5 |
|
25.7 |
|
22.5 |
% |
Goodwill amortization |
|
(48.7 |
) |
(25.9 |
) |
-87.8 |
% |
Financial Investments Gains/(Losses) |
|
(10.0 |
) |
(16.7 |
) |
39.9 |
% |
Net Interest paid |
|
(155.9 |
) |
(118.5 |
) |
-31.6 |
% |
Unfavourable foreign exchange differences |
|
(5.8 |
) |
(4.3 |
) |
-35.8 |
% |
Favourable foreign exchange difference |
|
8.3 |
|
27.9 |
|
-70.4 |
% |
Other |
|
(19.0 |
) |
(8.2 |
) |
-133.5 |
% |
Financing Gains/(Losses) |
|
(172.5 |
) |
(103.0 |
) |
-67.5 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial results |
|
(182.5 |
) |
(119.7 |
) |
-52.5 |
% |
Income from Equity Method ( m) |
|
1H2003 |
|
1H2002 |
|
r% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
REN (30%) |
|
10.9 |
|
9.8 |
|
10.8 |
% |
Escelsa (54.74%) (1) |
|
|
|
(31.6 |
) |
|
|
HidroCantábrico (19% x 50%) (2) |
|
|
|
5.4 |
|
|
|
CEM (22%) |
|
2.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
Electra (30.6%) |
|
(7.2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
1.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
7.2 |
|
(16.4 |
) |
|
|
Goodwill amortization ( m) |
|
1H2003 |
|
1H2002 |
|
r% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hidrocantábrico |
|
15.2 |
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
EBE |
|
4.2 |
|
6.4 |
|
-34.3 |
% |
IVEN |
|
18.8 |
|
9.2 |
|
103.8 |
% |
ACE Holding |
|
1.9 |
|
1.5 |
|
26.9 |
% |
Comunitel |
|
5.4 |
|
5.2 |
|
3.4 |
% |
Other |
|
3.3 |
|
3.5 |
|
-5.9 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
48.7 |
|
25.9 |
|
87.8 |
% |
Dividends received ( m) |
|
1H2003 |
|
1H2002 |
|
r% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BCP |
|
10.1 |
|
14.9 |
|
-31.8 |
% |
Iberdrola |
|
18.6 |
|
6.7 |
|
179.6 |
% |
Tejo Energia |
|
1.5 |
|
1.5 |
|
0.0 |
% |
Other |
|
1.2 |
|
2.7 |
|
-54.1 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
31.5 |
|
25.7 |
|
22.5 |
% |
The Groups financial loss was 62.9 million or 52.5% higher than in the first half of 2002, again mainly due to changes in the Groups consolidation method and perimeter, namely: Escelsa and Enersul, previously consolidated by the equity method, are now fully consolidated; Hidrocantábrico, which was equity consolidated for the first 5 months of 2002 and 40% proportional consolidated for June 2002, is now 40% proportional consolidated.
(1) Escelsa and Enersul were equity consolidated until September 2002. Since October 2002 these companies are fully consolidated. EDP controls 54.74% of Escelsa and 35.69% of Enersul.
(2) Hidrocantábrico was equity consolidated (19% x 50%) through May 30, 2002. Since June 2002 it was proportionally consolidated in accordance with EDPs stake in Hidrocantábrico (40%).
27
(1) In 1H2002 EDP equity consolidated a 31.6 million loss from Escelsa and Enersul, mostly due to the impact of the Brazilian Real devaluation on these companies US$ denominated debt. This year EDP equity consolidated 7.2 million of accumulated losses (between 2000 and 2002) for Electra, Cabo Verdes distribution company in which the Group owns 30.6%. Until 1H2003 the book value of Electra in EDPs accounts only reflected acquisition cost;
(2) Although EDP received 4.7 million less in dividends from BCP in 1H2003 than in 1H2002, EDP booked a further 12.0 million in dividends from Iberdrola;
(3) In 1H2003 EDP started amortizing the goodwill resulting from the tender offer on IVEN (November 2001), which is an extra 9.6 million in goodwill amortization. The variation also reflects goodwill amortization from Hidrocantábrico in 1H2003 (15.2 million);
(4) Escelsa has a 431 million bond issue in US$, of which EDP S.A. owns approximately 83%. In 1H2003 EDP fully consolidated Escelsas 18.4 million net interest charges. In the consolidation of the Group accounts, 83% of the coupon on Escelsas issue, wich was received by EDP S.A., was netted off against the total coupon paid by Escelsa. Variation in net interest charges is also due to the full consolidation of Enersul (+7.0 million), the proportional consolidation of 40% of Hidrocantábrico (+16.2 million) and the increased debt at the Holding company level, offset by a decrease in the interest rates;
(5) Systematic gains on derivatives result from EDPs efficient derivative contracting policy, aimed at an active management of the hedging of the financial debt, in order to reduce the risk underlying interest rates;
(6) Because of Escelsas US$ bond issue, the companys P&L is influenced by forex differences arising from Real volatility. In 1H2002 EDP S.A. acquired a US$102.5 million asset with the sole purpose of covering its share of the Brazilian subsidiaries US$ debt and mitigate the effects this exposure, that was affecting EDPs consolidated P&L [see (1)]. During the 2H2002 EDP acquired approximately 83% of Escelsas US$ bond issue, which remais domiciled at the holding level. In 1H2003 EDP fully consolidated Escelsa and the forex gains registered locally by the company, following the Real appreciation, were netted off, in Group consolidation, against the forex loss booked at EDP S.A..
28
Consolidated Extraordinary Results
Extraordinary Results ( m) |
|
1H2003 |
|
1H2002 |
|
r% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed assets gains / (losses) |
|
6.4 |
|
15.5 |
|
-58.5 |
% |
Decrease in deprec. and provisions |
|
23.3 |
|
12.9 |
|
80.8 |
% |
Prior year adjustment (net) |
|
(2.4 |
) |
(5.0 |
) |
52.3 |
% |
Hydrological correction |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation of subsidies and concessions |
|
39.1 |
|
37.4 |
|
4.6 |
% |
Bad debts |
|
(0.3 |
) |
(0.7 |
) |
|
|
Inventory gains / (losses) |
|
(0.6 |
) |
(1.0 |
) |
39.0 |
% |
Other gains / (losses) |
|
(6.1 |
) |
(10.8 |
) |
43.5 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Extraordinary Results |
|
59.4 |
|
48.2 |
|
23.2 |
% |
1H2002 Hydrological Fund ( m)
Initial Balance |
|
Changes to the Hydrological Fund |
|
EDP |
|
Final Balance |
|
||
1H2002 |
|
Financial Costs |
|||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
387.5 |
|
-81.1 |
|
5.5 |
|
0.0 |
|
311.9 |
|
1H2003 Hydrological Fund ( m)
Initial Balance |
|
Changes to the Hydrological Fund |
|
EDP |
|
Final Balance |
|
||
1H2003 |
|
Financial Costs |
|||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
324.1 |
|
53.0 |
|
5.9 |
|
0.0 |
|
383.1 |
|
The EDP Groups net extraordinary gains amounted to 59.4 million. Most of this figure results from recurring depreciation of subsidised EDPD investments.
1H2003 fixed assets gains are the result of the sale of ONI Ways assets following the companys shutdown process. The assets whose sale generated gains had not been accounted for in ONI Ways shutdown provision. In 1H2002 gains on fixed asset came from the sale of office buildings to EDPs pension fund.
The item Decrease in depreciations and provisions in 1H2003 is mainly due to the reduction of a provision that had been created to mitigate the eventual market loss on Escelsas dollar denominated assets (NBCEs).
Tax rate analisys ( m) |
|
1H2003 |
|
1H2002 |
|
r% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pre-tax profit |
|
283.7 |
|
281.8 |
|
0.7 |
% |
Income Taxes |
|
110.6 |
|
85.3 |
|
29.7 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Apparent Tax Rate |
|
39.0 |
% |
30.3 |
% |
8.7 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity method adjustments |
|
(7.2 |
) |
16.4 |
|
|
|
Goodwill amortization |
|
48.7 |
|
25.9 |
|
87.8 |
% |
Dividends received |
|
(31.5 |
) |
(25.7 |
) |
-22.5 |
% |
Other permanent differences |
|
18.3 |
|
28.9 |
|
-36.6 |
% |
Permanent differences |
|
28.3 |
|
45.6 |
|
-37.8 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjustment to tax estimate |
|
+7.7 |
|
-22.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Marginal tax rate reconciliation |
|
33.0 |
% |
33.0 |
% |
0.0 |
% |
The apparent tax rate went up from 30% to 39% or 25.3 million in absolute terms compared to the same period last year. The taxable base is negatively influenced by the increase in goodwill (non tax-deductible cost), already explained in the Financial Results section, and the change in the consolidation method of Escelsa and Enersul, which now bring their tax charge into the consolidation. However, the biggest impact was from a 30.4 million swing in the previous years tax estimates. In the 1H2002 the tax bill was reduced by the amount over-estimated in 2001 (22.7 million), while in 1H2003 the opposite is true. Tax due was under-estimated in 2H2002 and therefore a higher provisional charge was now booked (7.7 million). This should be a one-off item.
29
Consolidated Income Statement ( m) |
|
1H2003 |
|
1H2002 |
|
r% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Electricity Sales |
|
3,115.6 |
|
2,818.6 |
|
10.5 |
% |
Other Sales |
|
30.9 |
|
41.6 |
|
-25.7 |
% |
Services Provided |
|
199.2 |
|
203.8 |
|
-2.3 |
% |
Operating Revenues |
|
3,345.7 |
|
3,064.0 |
|
9.2 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Electricity |
|
1,598.2 |
|
1,428.7 |
|
11.9 |
% |
Fuel |
|
129.3 |
|
239.7 |
|
-46.0 |
% |
Sundry materials and goods for resale |
|
115.7 |
|
70.1 |
|
65.1 |
% |
Supplies and services |
|
310.2 |
|
296.7 |
|
4.5 |
% |
Personnel costs |
|
345.3 |
|
316.8 |
|
9.0 |
% |
Concession fees |
|
87.9 |
|
78.2 |
|
12.4 |
% |
Other operating costs (or revenues) |
|
(2.1 |
) |
(6.3 |
) |
67.2 |
% |
Own work capitalised |
|
(116.7 |
) |
(106.0 |
) |
-10.1 |
% |
Operating costs |
|
2,468.0 |
|
2,318.0 |
|
6.5 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EBITDA |
|
877.7 |
|
746.0 |
|
17.6 |
% |
EBITDA/Revenues |
|
26.2 |
% |
24.3 |
% |
1.9 |
p.p. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciations |
|
408.3 |
|
343.9 |
|
18.7 |
% |
Provisions |
|
62.5 |
|
48.9 |
|
27.8 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EBIT |
|
406.8 |
|
353.3 |
|
15.2 |
% |
EBIT/Revenues |
|
12.2 |
% |
11.5 |
% |
0.6 |
p.p. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial Results |
|
(182.5 |
) |
(119.7 |
) |
-52.5 |
% |
Extraordinary Results |
|
59.4 |
|
48.2 |
|
23.2 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pre-tax profit |
|
283.7 |
|
281.8 |
|
0.7 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income Taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
110.6 |
|
85.3 |
|
29.7 |
% |
Minorities |
|
(9.0 |
) |
(34.1 |
) |
73.6 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Profit |
|
182.0 |
|
230.6 |
|
-21.1 |
% |
Minorities were 25.1 million lower due to lower net losses at ONI and the positive contribution of the Brazilian subsidiaries EDP now fully consolidates.
30
Adjusted Cash Flow and Consolidated Balance Sheet
Cash Flow ( m) |
|
1H2003 |
|
1H2002 |
|
r% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Income |
|
182.0 |
|
230.6 |
|
-21.1 |
% |
Depreciation |
|
408.3 |
|
343.9 |
|
18.7 |
% |
Provisions |
|
62.5 |
|
48.9 |
|
27.8 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash-Flow |
|
652.9 |
|
623.4 |
|
4.7 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tariff Adjustment |
|
(15.0 |
) |
13.0 |
|
|
|
Hydrological Correction |
|
53.0 |
|
(81.1 |
) |
|
|
Hydrological Account Interest |
|
5.9 |
|
5.5 |
|
7.3 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjusted Cash-Flow |
|
696.9 |
|
560.8 |
|
24.3 |
% |
Assets ( m) |
|
1H2002 |
|
YE2002 |
|
1H2002 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Currents assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
142.8 |
|
214.0 |
|
40.4 |
|
Accounts receivable - trade, net |
|
943.5 |
|
864.6 |
|
849.0 |
|
Shareholders |
|
|
|
|
|
10.4 |
|
Accounts receivable - other, net |
|
524.8 |
|
573.2 |
|
386.8 |
|
Inventories |
|
134.7 |
|
150.3 |
|
139.6 |
|
|
|
1,745.8 |
|
1,802.1 |
|
1,426.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term receivables |
|
263.4 |
|
260.6 |
|
139.6 |
|
Investments, net |
|
1,771.0 |
|
1,896.0 |
|
2,820.6 |
|
Fixed assets, net |
|
11,209.7 |
|
11,204.2 |
|
10,427.2 |
|
Intangible assets, net |
|
1,836.7 |
|
1,843.1 |
|
1,293.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued income |
|
326.6 |
|
343.6 |
|
261.7 |
|
Prepaid expenses |
|
250.4 |
|
775.6 |
|
587.3 |
|
Deferred Tax |
|
667.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
18,071.4 |
|
18,125.2 |
|
16,955.6 |
|
Liabilities ( m) |
|
1H2003 |
|
YE2002 |
|
1H2002 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Short-term debt and current portion of long-term debt |
|
1,788.8 |
|
1,887.0 |
|
2,323.8 |
|
Accounts payable - trade, net |
|
792.1 |
|
1,017.8 |
|
812.0 |
|
State and other public entities |
|
87.0 |
|
49.8 |
|
242.9 |
|
Accounts payable - other, net |
|
260.4 |
|
174.5 |
|
277.6 |
|
|
|
2,928.4 |
|
3,129.0 |
|
3,656.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt |
|
6,214.2 |
|
6,107.0 |
|
4,183.1 |
|
Provisions |
|
762.6 |
|
806.3 |
|
826.4 |
|
Hydrologic correction account |
|
383.1 |
|
324.1 |
|
311.9 |
|
Other liabilities |
|
133.3 |
|
126.8 |
|
86.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued expenses |
|
389.5 |
|
294.5 |
|
325.4 |
|
Deferred income |
|
1,512.1 |
|
1,778.1 |
|
1,544.1 |
|
Deferred Tax |
|
278.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
12,601.3 |
|
12,565.8 |
|
10,933.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Minority interest |
|
57.0 |
|
65.2 |
|
207.0 |
|
Shareholders equity ( m) |
|
1H2003 |
|
YE2002 |
|
1H2002 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Share capital |
|
2,954.6 |
|
2,956.5 |
|
2,962.3 |
|
Revaluation reserves |
|
1,172.7 |
|
1,172.7 |
|
2,020.9 |
|
Legal reserves |
|
260.5 |
|
243.7 |
|
243.7 |
|
Other reserves |
|
(323.2 |
) |
(429.6 |
) |
(186.4 |
) |
Equity Adjustments |
|
(192.7 |
) |
(269.0 |
) |
|
|
Retained earnings |
|
1,359.1 |
|
1,484.6 |
|
543.9 |
|
Net profit for the year |
|
182.0 |
|
335.2 |
|
230.6 |
|
Sharehoders equity |
|
5,413.1 |
|
5,494.2 |
|
5,815.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and shareholders equity |
|
18,071.4 |
|
18,125.2 |
|
16,955.6 |
|
EDPs shareholdings in BCP and Iberdrola were marked-to-market as of the 30th June 2003, resulting in an updated Equity Adjustment Reserve of 192.7 million.
The Escelsa bonds bought by EDP S.A. (accounted in EDP S.A.s balance sheet), serve the sole purpose of covering Escelsas US Dollar liability, therefore on a consolidated basis this asset and the corresponding liability are netted off.
31
Income Statement by Business Areas
1H2003 |
|
EDP |
|
EDP |
|
HC (1) |
|
Bandeirante |
|
Escelsa |
|
Enersul |
|
ONI |
|
Information |
|
Consolidated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Electricity Sales |
|
626.5 |
|
1,778.8 |
|
280.1 |
|
226.6 |
|
124.7 |
|
72.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
3,115.6 |
|
Other Sales |
|
9.6 |
|
8.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.3 |
|
13.1 |
|
30.9 |
|
Services Provided |
|
7.5 |
|
0.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
160.4 |
|
82.2 |
|
199.2 |
|
Operating Revenues |
|
643.6 |
|
1,788.3 |
|
280.1 |
|
226.6 |
|
124.7 |
|
72.2 |
|
161.7 |
|
95.2 |
|
3,345.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Electricity |
|
30.4 |
|
1,182.2 |
|
146.0 |
|
171.7 |
|
75.2 |
|
37.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
1,598.2 |
|
Fuel |
|
131.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
129.3 |
|
Sundry materials and goods for resale |
|
2.0 |
|
51.3 |
|
42.0 |
|
1.0 |
|
1.0 |
|
1.7 |
|
86.7 |
|
10.9 |
|
115.7 |
|
Supplies and services |
|
29.0 |
|
95.5 |
|
14.5 |
|
11.1 |
|
7.8 |
|
5.5 |
|
46.6 |
|
34.7 |
|
310.2 |
|
Personnel costs |
|
61.0 |
|
202.5 |
|
16.8 |
|
11.9 |
|
9.4 |
|
7.1 |
|
30.9 |
|
33.4 |
|
345.3 |
|
Concession fees |
|
1.9 |
|
85.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
87.9 |
|
Other operating costs (or revenues) |
|
(1.9 |
) |
(5.8 |
) |
1.1 |
|
(0.8 |
) |
0.8 |
|
0.3 |
|
0.1 |
|
(1.3 |
) |
(2.1 |
) |
Own work capitalised |
|
(17.5 |
) |
(88.1 |
) |
(2.1 |
) |
(0.2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3.6 |
) |
(116.7 |
) |
Operating costs |
|
235.9 |
|
1,523.2 |
|
218.2 |
|
194.7 |
|
94.2 |
|
51.7 |
|
164.2 |
|
74.1 |
|
2,468.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EBITDA |
|
407.6 |
|
265.1 |
|
61.9 |
|
31.9 |
|
30.6 |
|
20.5 |
|
(2.5 |
) |
21.1 |
|
877.7 |
|
EBITDA/Revenues |
|
63.3 |
% |
14.8 |
% |
22.1 |
% |
14.1 |
% |
24.5 |
% |
28.4 |
% |
-1.5 |
% |
22.2 |
% |
26.2 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciations |
|
118.1 |
|
173.1 |
|
27.9 |
|
16.0 |
|
8.3 |
|
7.8 |
|
33.6 |
|
11.3 |
|
408.3 |
|
Provisions |
|
4.9 |
|
42.0 |
|
0.6 |
|
2.1 |
|
6.6 |
|
2.0 |
|
2.2 |
|
0.4 |
|
62.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EBIT |
|
284.6 |
|
50.1 |
|
33.4 |
|
13.8 |
|
15.7 |
|
10.7 |
|
(38.4 |
) |
9.5 |
|
406.8 |
|
EBIT/Revenues |
|
44.2 |
% |
2.8 |
% |
11.9 |
% |
6.1 |
% |
12.6 |
% |
14.8 |
% |
-23.7 |
% |
10.0 |
% |
12.2 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial Results |
|
(33.9 |
) |
(17.3 |
) |
(29.0 |
) |
(14.9 |
) |
48.1 |
|
(3.1 |
) |
(26.2 |
) |
(5.3 |
) |
(182.5 |
) |
Extraordinary Results |
|
6.9 |
|
44.9 |
|
2.3 |
|
(1.7 |
) |
21.1 |
|
(6.9 |
) |
(4.9 |
) |
(0.5 |
) |
59.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pre-tax profit |
|
257.6 |
|
77.8 |
|
6.8 |
|
(2.7 |
) |
84.9 |
|
0.7 |
|
(69.5 |
) |
3.6 |
|
283.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income taxes |
|
87.0 |
|
25.7 |
|
(6.2 |
) |
(1.4 |
) |
30.6 |
|
3.6 |
|
(5.0 |
) |
2.4 |
|
110.6 |
|
Minority interests |
|
2.3 |
|
|
|
0.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
(0.2 |
) |
(9.0 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Profit |
|
168.3 |
|
52.1 |
|
12.2 |
|
(1.4 |
) |
54.3 |
|
(2.9 |
) |
(64.6 |
) |
1.5 |
|
182.0 |
|
Note: Business segment accounts not audited
(1) 40% Consolidation
32
1H2002 |
|
EDP |
|
EDP |
|
HC (1) |
|
Bandeirante (2) |
|
Escelsa |
|
Enersul |
|
ONI (3) |
|
Information |
|
Consolidated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Electricity Sales |
|
711.2 |
|
1,714.5 |
|
51.4 |
|
345.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,818.6 |
|
Other Sales |
|
6.5 |
|
12.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7.6 |
|
25.4 |
|
41.6 |
|
Services Provided |
|
8.5 |
|
0.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
141.6 |
|
88.4 |
|
203.8 |
|
Operating Revenues |
|
726.2 |
|
1,727.7 |
|
51.4 |
|
345.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
149.2 |
|
113.8 |
|
3,064.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Electricity |
|
6.7 |
|
1,141.6 |
|
31.8 |
|
265.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,428.7 |
|
Fuel |
|
239.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
239.7 |
|
Sundry materials and goods for resale |
|
2.4 |
|
31.0 |
|
7.8 |
|
1.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
82.1 |
|
15.3 |
|
70.1 |
|
Supplies and services |
|
33.7 |
|
89.1 |
|
4.6 |
|
14.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
64.6 |
|
48.3 |
|
296.7 |
|
Personnel costs |
|
60.9 |
|
196.1 |
|
2.8 |
|
18.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
47.6 |
|
39.2 |
|
316.8 |
|
Concession fees |
|
1.8 |
|
76.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
78.2 |
|
Other operating costs (or revenues) |
|
(2.4 |
) |
(5.3 |
) |
(5.0 |
) |
2.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
(3.0 |
) |
(0.5 |
) |
(6.3 |
) |
Own work capitalised |
|
(14.6 |
) |
(67.9 |
) |
(3.0 |
) |
(0.5 |
) |
|
|
|
|
(17.2 |
) |
(10.1 |
) |
(106.0 |
) |
Operating costs |
|
328.2 |
|
1,460.9 |
|
39.1 |
|
302.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
174.1 |
|
92.3 |
|
2,318.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EBITDA |
|
398.0 |
|
266.8 |
|
12.3 |
|
43.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
(24.9 |
) |
21.5 |
|
746.0 |
|
EBITDA/Revenues |
|
54.8 |
% |
15.4 |
% |
23.9 |
% |
12.6 |
% |
|
|
|
|
-16.7 |
% |
18.9 |
% |
24.3 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciations |
|
113.2 |
|
164.1 |
|
3.6 |
|
16.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
30.5 |
|
8.9 |
|
343.9 |
|
Provisions |
|
8.6 |
|
27.9 |
|
2.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.7 |
|
0.2 |
|
48.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EBIT |
|
276.2 |
|
74.8 |
|
6.6 |
|
27.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
(58.1 |
) |
12.5 |
|
353.3 |
|
EBIT/Revenues |
|
38.0 |
% |
4.3 |
% |
12.8 |
% |
7.9 |
% |
|
|
|
|
-39.0 |
% |
11.0 |
% |
11.5 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial Results |
|
(42.5 |
) |
(14.6 |
) |
(1.0 |
) |
(11.0 |
) |
|
|
|
|
(23.1 |
) |
(6.0 |
) |
(119.7 |
) |
Extraordinary Results |
|
5.5 |
|
54.8 |
|
(0.3 |
) |
(8.0 |
) |
|
|
|
|
22.5 |
|
(0.1 |
) |
48.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pre-tax profit |
|
239.2 |
|
115.0 |
|
5.3 |
|
8.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
(58.8 |
) |
6.4 |
|
281.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income taxes |
|
82.3 |
|
44.1 |
|
2.1 |
|
4.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
(8.4 |
) |
3.2 |
|
85.3 |
|
Minority interests |
|
|
|
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.2 |
) |
(34.1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Profit |
|
156.9 |
|
70.9 |
|
3.3 |
|
4.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
(50.4 |
) |
3.3 |
|
230.6 |
|
Note: Business segment accounts not audited
(1) 40% of June 2002
(2) accounts consolidated in the 1H2002
(3) Includes ONI Way
33
Balance Sheet by Business Areas
1H2003 |
|
EDP |
|
EDP |
|
HC (1) |
|
Bandeirante |
|
Escelsa |
|
Enersul |
|
ONI |
|
Information |
|
Consolidated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intangible assets |
|
5.3 |
|
0.1 |
|
439.7 |
|
4.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
305.5 |
|
8.7 |
|
1,836.7 |
|
Fixed assets |
|
4,293.6 |
|
4,326.0 |
|
980.2 |
|
348.0 |
|
226.6 |
|
187.8 |
|
239.3 |
|
92.6 |
|
11,209.7 |
|
Financial Investments |
|
37.5 |
|
0.2 |
|
54.8 |
|
|
|
192.8 |
|
2.8 |
|
2.0 |
|
65.8 |
|
1,771.0 |
|
Current assets |
|
1,084.8 |
|
631.0 |
|
197.1 |
|
156.7 |
|
154.0 |
|
73.6 |
|
253.5 |
|
123.8 |
|
1,745.8 |
|
Long-term receivables |
|
27.5 |
|
|
|
28.6 |
|
86.1 |
|
154.8 |
|
41.0 |
|
8.9 |
|
|
|
263.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accruals and deferrals |
|
50.4 |
|
103.8 |
|
0.4 |
|
123.3 |
|
92.8 |
|
60.8 |
|
113.4 |
|
30.9 |
|
1,244.8 |
|
Total assets |
|
5,499.1 |
|
5,061.1 |
|
1,700.8 |
|
718.1 |
|
821.0 |
|
366.0 |
|
922.7 |
|
321.8 |
|
18,071.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provisions |
|
117.2 |
|
320.0 |
|
35.1 |
|
49.8 |
|
38.9 |
|
13.6 |
|
33.5 |
|
3.0 |
|
762.6 |
|
Hydrologic correction account |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
383.1 |
|
Financial debt |
|
2,510.0 |
|
844.0 |
|
805.8 |
|
245.7 |
|
500.3 |
|
178.9 |
|
631.3 |
|
95.6 |
|
8,003.1 |
|
Other medium and long term liabilities |
|
15.0 |
|
|
|
36.7 |
|
32.2 |
|
58.7 |
|
9.3 |
|
172.9 |
|
1.3 |
|
133.3 |
|
Other short term liabilities |
|
934.3 |
|
1,056.8 |
|
114.4 |
|
128.9 |
|
67.4 |
|
34.3 |
|
166.3 |
|
138.0 |
|
1,139.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accruals and deferrals |
|
136.0 |
|
1,355.7 |
|
26.4 |
|
72.2 |
|
19.2 |
|
2.9 |
|
62.9 |
|
16.6 |
|
2,179.8 |
|
Total liabilities |
|
3,712.6 |
|
3,576.4 |
|
1,018.3 |
|
528.7 |
|
684.5 |
|
239.0 |
|
1,067.0 |
|
254.5 |
|
12,601.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Minority interests |
|
35.3 |
|
|
|
5.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.2 |
|
6.4 |
|
57.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shareholders equity |
|
1,751.3 |
|
1,484.7 |
|
677.3 |
|
189.5 |
|
136.5 |
|
127.0 |
|
(144.4 |
) |
60.9 |
|
5,413.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities + equity |
|
5,499.1 |
|
5,061.1 |
|
1,700.8 |
|
718.1 |
|
821.0 |
|
366.0 |
|
922.7 |
|
321.8 |
|
18,071.4 |
|
Note: Business segment accounts not audited
(1) 40% consolidation
34
2002 |
|
EDP |
|
EDP |
|
HC (1) |
|
Bandeirante |
|
Escelsa |
|
Enersul |
|
ONI |
|
Information |
|
Consolidated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intangible assets |
|
5.9 |
|
0.1 |
|
444.4 |
|
4.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
344.1 |
|
8.6 |
|
1,843.1 |
|
Fixed assets |
|
4,324.1 |
|
4,329.8 |
|
983.6 |
|
307.6 |
|
203.5 |
|
171.1 |
|
242.9 |
|
86.1 |
|
11,204.2 |
|
Financial Investments |
|
25.9 |
|
0.2 |
|
92.0 |
|
|
|
201.5 |
|
2.5 |
|
68.4 |
|
68.0 |
|
1,896.0 |
|
Current assets |
|
820.5 |
|
558.2 |
|
167.3 |
|
158.1 |
|
209.8 |
|
48.0 |
|
150.7 |
|
141.5 |
|
1,802.1 |
|
Long-term receivables |
|
1.9 |
|
93.0 |
|
21.3 |
|
76.5 |
|
51.8 |
|
39.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
260.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accruals and deferrals |
|
21.6 |
|
160.0 |
|
1.5 |
|
104.3 |
|
74.2 |
|
56.1 |
|
105.4 |
|
21.9 |
|
1,119.1 |
|
Total assets |
|
5,199.9 |
|
5,141.4 |
|
1,710.0 |
|
650.7 |
|
740.9 |
|
316.8 |
|
911.4 |
|
326.1 |
|
18,125.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provisions |
|
116.8 |
|
312.4 |
|
38.5 |
|
41.8 |
|
44.8 |
|
10.4 |
|
22.1 |
|
2.8 |
|
806.3 |
|
Hydrologic correction account |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
324.1 |
|
Financial debt |
|
2,458.8 |
|
945.7 |
|
816.6 |
|
233.1 |
|
542.0 |
|
155.5 |
|
628.2 |
|
90.2 |
|
7,994.1 |
|
Other medium and long term liabilities |
|
15.0 |
|
54.5 |
|
34.4 |
|
37.0 |
|
15.7 |
|
8.9 |
|
123.5 |
|
1.2 |
|
126.8 |
|
Other short term liabilities |
|
631.5 |
|
1,022.0 |
|
127.7 |
|
108.2 |
|
76.2 |
|
26.8 |
|
168.0 |
|
141.4 |
|
1,242.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accruals and deferrals |
|
88.4 |
|
1,287.4 |
|
23.5 |
|
60.6 |
|
2.1 |
|
|
|
56.6 |
|
15.9 |
|
2,072.6 |
|
Total liabilities |
|
3,310.4 |
|
3,622.2 |
|
1,040.8 |
|
480.6 |
|
680.8 |
|
201.6 |
|
998.5 |
|
251.5 |
|
12,565.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Minority interests |
|
34.9 |
|
|
|
4.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.8 |
) |
6.8 |
|
65.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shareholders equity |
|
1,854.6 |
|
1,519.2 |
|
664.4 |
|
170.1 |
|
60.1 |
|
115.2 |
|
(86.3 |
) |
67.8 |
|
5,494.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities + equity |
|
5,199.9 |
|
5,141.4 |
|
1,710.0 |
|
650.7 |
|
740.9 |
|
316.8 |
|
911.4 |
|
326.1 |
|
18,125.2 |
|
Note: Business segment accounts not audited
(1) 40% consolidation
35
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
Dated September 9, 2003
|
EDP- Electricidadé de Portugal |
||
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
By: |
/s/ Francisco de la Fuente Sánchez |
|
|
Name: Francisco de la Fuente Sánchez |
||
|
Title: Director |