The increasing complexity of regulatory frameworks has prompted businesses to integrate artificial intelligence (AI) into compliance strategies. AI-powered tools enable organizations to transition from reactive to proactive compliance, automating risk detection, regulatory adherence, and governance processes. These advancements have proven particularly effective in finance, healthcare, and AI-driven automation, where compliance demands are intricate and ever-evolving.
The Role of AI in Ethical Compliance
AI enhances compliance monitoring by continuously scanning transactions, communications, and business operations for anomalies. Machine learning algorithms predict compliance risks, allowing businesses to implement preventive measures before regulatory breaches occur. Moreover, AI-driven natural language processing (NLP) automates the interpretation of regulatory changes, ensuring timely updates to corporate policies.
Challenges and Ethical Risks
Despite AI’s efficiency in streamlining compliance, significant ethical and legal challenges persist. Algorithmic bias, lack of transparency in AI decision-making, and inadequate human oversight can lead to unfair or erroneous compliance assessments. The opacity of AI models, often referred to as the 'black box' problem, raises concerns about accountability and regulatory trust. Businesses must prioritize explainable AI frameworks and implement mechanisms that enhance fairness and bias detection in compliance processes.
AI in Industry-Specific Compliance
Industries such as fintech, healthcare, and corporate governance have increasingly adopted AI-driven compliance solutions:
- Fintech: AI automates anti-money laundering (AML) compliance, fraud detection, and Know Your Customer (KYC) processes, reducing human error and improving efficiency.
- Healthcare: AI ensures data privacy compliance with regulations like GDPR and HIPAA, monitoring sensitive patient data and mitigating risks associated with privacy breaches.
- Corporate Governance: AI aids in risk management by auditing financial transactions and detecting regulatory discrepancies, strengthening corporate accountability.
Future of AI in Compliance
Regulatory bodies worldwide are adapting to AI-driven compliance by introducing standards such as the EU AI Act and ISO/IEC 42001. Future compliance solutions will likely integrate AI with blockchain for enhanced transparency and real-time regulatory reporting. Businesses must balance AI automation with human oversight to ensure ethical, legal, and operational integrity in compliance functions.
Key Takeaways
- AI enhances compliance by automating risk detection and ensuring regulatory adherence.
- Ethical risks, including AI bias and lack of transparency, require mitigation strategies.
- Industry-specific AI applications improve efficiency in fintech, healthcare, and governance.
- The future of AI compliance will involve regulatory adaptation and a balance between automation and human oversight.
By integrating AI responsibly, businesses can navigate the complexities of modern compliance while upholding ethical and legal standards.
For Full Version of the publication visit: Henry Akinlude News
References
Adadi, A., & Berrada, M. (2018). Peeking inside the black-box: A survey on explainable artificial intelligence (XAI). IEEE Access, 6, 52138-52160: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/327709435
AI.Business. (2024). Enhancing fraud detection through AI: A Danske Bank journey. https://ai.business/case-studies/enhancing-fraud-detection-through-ai-a-danske-bank-journey/
Aldboush, H. H. H., & Ferdous, M. (2023). Building Trust in Fintech: An Analysis of Ethical and Privacy Considerations in the Intersection of Big Data, AI, and Customer Trust. International Journal of Financial Studies, 11(3), 90. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijfs11030090
AXA XL. (2024). AI: Helping us to protect what matters. https://axaxl.com/fast-fast-forward/articles/ai-helping-us-to-protect-what-matters
Bahoo, S., Cucculelli, M., Goga, X., & Mondolo, J. (2024). Artificial intelligence in finance: A comprehensive review through bibliometric and content analysis. SN Business & Economics, 4(1), 23. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43546-023-00618-x
Barocas, S., Hardt, M., & Narayanan, A. (2019). Fairness and machine learning: Limitations and opportunities. MIT Press. https://fairmlbook.org/pdf/fairmlbook.pdf
Bogen, M., & Rieke, A. (2018). Help wanted: An examination of hiring algorithms, equity, and bias. Upturn. https://creatingfutureus.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/10/Bogen_Rieke-2018-PredictiveHiring.pdf
Brundage, M., Avin, S., Wang, J., Belfield, H., Krueger, G., Hadfield, G., & Dafoe, A. (2020). "Toward trustworthy AI development: Mechanisms for supporting verifiable claims." arXiv preprint arXiv:2004.07213. https://arxiv.org/abs/2004.07213
Calo, R. (2017). Artificial intelligence policy: A primer and roadmap. Stanford Law Review, 72(3), 541-586. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3015350
Citibank. (2017). Machine learning and cognitive computing: Enhancing transaction risk management.
Coates, J. (2007). The Goals and Promise of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 21(1), 91-116. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.21.1.91
CNIL. (2019). CNIL's restricted committee imposes a financial penalty of 50 million euros against GOOGLE LLC. Retrieved from https://www.cnil.fr/en/cnils-restricted-committee-imposes-financial-penalty-50-million-euros-against-google-llc
David, B. (2024). AI in financial crime prevention: A transformative approach. The Payments Association. Retrieved from https://thepaymentsassociation.org/article/ai-in-financial-crime-prevention-a-transformative-approach/
Eubanks, V. (2018). Automating Inequality: How High-Tech Tools Profile, Police, and Punish the Poor. St. Martin's Press.
European Parliament. (2016). General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR).
FDA U.S. Food and Drug Administration. (2025). FDA proposes framework to advance credibility of AI models used for drug and biological product submissions. https://www.fda.gov/news-events/press-announcements/fda-proposes-framework-advance-credibility-ai-models-used-drug-and-biological-product-submissions
Financial Conduct Authority (FCA). (2021). "Guidance on AI and machine learning in financial compliance." Retrieved from https://www.fca.org.uk/publications.
Floridi, L. (2023). Ethics of artificial intelligence: Principles, challenges, and opportunities. AI & Ethics, 1(1), 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198883098.001.0001
European Commission. (2021). Proposal for a Regulation laying down harmonized rules on artificial intelligence (Artificial Intelligence Act).
Financial Times. (2025). Letter: Where business leaders can feel reassured on AI. Retrieved from https://www.ft.com/content/46c3d395-b8c0-494e-803b-a533ff4a8c62
FinTech Futures. (2025). AI and ESG: the dynamic duo revolutionising sustainable reporting. Retrieved from https://www.fintechfutures.com/2025/01/ai-and-esg-the-dynamic-duo-revolutionising-sustainable-reporting/
Futurism. (2017). An AI completed 360,000 hours of finance work in just seconds. Retrieved from Futurism. https://futurism.com/an-ai-completed-360000-hours-of-finance-work-in-just-seconds
GDPR, Article 22. (2018). "Automated individual decision-making, including profiling." Official Journal of the European Union.
Golpayegani, D., Hupont, I., Panigutti, C., Pandit, H. J., Schade, S., O'Sullivan, D., & Lewis, D. (2024). AI Cards: Towards an Applied Framework for Machine-Readable AI and Risk Documentation Inspired by the EU AI Act. https://arxiv.org/abs/2406.18211
Gomber, P., Koch, J.-A., & Siering, M. (2017). Digital Finance and FinTech: Current Research and Future Research Directions. Journal of Business Economics, 87(5), 537–580. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11573-017-0852-x
Google Cloud Blog. (2023). How HSBC fights money launderers with artificial intelligence. Retrieved from Google Cloud Blog. https://cloud.google.com/blog/topics/financial-services/how-hsbc-fights-money-launderers-with-artificial-intelligence
Greenleaf, G. (2021). The Global Diffusion of Data Protection Laws: Analyzing New Trends. International Data Privacy Law, 11(1), 1-21. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3836261
Han, J., Huang, Y., Liu, S., & Towey, K. (2020). Artificial intelligence for anti-money laundering: A review and extension. Digital Finance, 2(3), 211-239. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42521-020-00023-1
HIPAA Journal. (2024). When AI Technology and HIPAA Collide. https://www.hipaajournal.com/when-ai-technology-and-hipaa-collide/
IBM. (n.d.). Keeping your data secure and compliant. https://www.ibm.com/industries/healthcare
Iliev, P. (2010). The Effect of SOX Section 404: Costs, Benefits, and Firm Behavior. Journal of Accounting & Economics, 49(1-2), 123-148. https://pure.psu.edu/en/publications/the-effect-of-sox-section-404-costs-earnings-quality-and-stock-pr
Information Commissioner's Office (ICO). (2020). ICO fines British Airways £20m for data breach affecting more than 400,000 customers. Retrieved from https://www.gdprregister.eu/news/british-airways-fine/
Jain, V., Balakrishnan, A., Beeram, D., Najana, M., & Chintale, P. (2024). Leveraging Artificial Intelligence for Enhancing Regulatory Compliance in the Financial Sector. International Journal of Computer Trends and Technology, 72(5), 124-140. https://doi.org/10.14445/22312803/IJCTT-V72I5P116
J.P. Morgan. (2025). Anti-Money Laundering. Retrieved from https://www.jpmorgan.com/technology/artificial-intelligence/initiatives/synthetic-data/anti-money-laundering
JP Morgan. (2022). "AI and Compliance: Enhancing Risk Management Strategies."
Khare, P., & Srivastava, S. (2023). Transforming KYC with AI: A Comprehensive Review of Artificial Intelligence-Based Identity Verification. Journal of Emerging Technologies and Innovative Research, 10(5), 74-77. Retrieved from https://www.jetir.org/papers/JETIR2305G74.pdf
Kira Systems. (2024). Machine learning contract search, review, and analysis software.
Kroll, J. A. (2018). The fallacy of inscrutability. Yale Journal of Law & Technology, 23(1), 1-50. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2018.0084
Kuner, Christopher, and others (eds) 2020. The EU General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR): A Commentary (New York, 2020; online edn, Oxford Academic) https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198826491.001.0001
LawGeex. (2018). Comparing the performance of artificial intelligence to human lawyers in the review of standard business contracts. https://images.law.com/contrib/content/uploads/documents/397/5408/lawgeex.pdf
Lintvedt, M. N. (2022). Putting a price on data protection infringement. International Data Privacy Law, 12(1), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1093/idpl/ipab024
Lipton, Z. C. (2018). The mythos of model interpretability. Queue, 16(3), 31-57. https://arxiv.org/abs/1606.03490
Lorè, F., Basile, P., Appice, A., de Gemmis, M., Malerba, D., & Semeraro, G. (2023). An AI framework to support decisions on GDPR compliance. Journal of Intelligent Information Systems, 61(3), 541-568. Retrieved from https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10844-023-00782-4
Mastercard. (2023). AI-powered decision management key for global credit card security. https://b2b.mastercard.com/news-and-insights/blog/ai-powered-decision-management-key-for-global-credit-card-security/
Medium. (2024). Leveraging AI for Enhanced ESG Compliance and Performance. Retrieved from https://medium.com/@tarifabeach/leveraging-ai-for-enhanced-esg-compliance-and-performance-under-the-new-csddd-regulations-d82b7d184470
Mehrabi, N., Morstatter, F., Saxena, N., Lerman, K., & Galstyan, A. (2021). A survey on bias and fairness in machine learning. ACM Computing Surveys (CSUR), 54(6), 1-35. https://arxiv.org/abs/1908.09635
Mittelstadt, B. D., Allo, P., Taddeo, M., Wachter, S., & Floridi, L. (2016). "The Ethics of Algorithms: Mapping the Debate. Big Data & Society. In press. 10.1177/2053951716679679.
Morley, J., Machado, C. C. V., Burr, C., Cowls, J., Joshi, I., Taddeo, M., & Floridi, L. (2020). The Ethics of AI in Health Care: A Mapping Review. Social Science Research Network. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1016/j.socscimed.2020.113172
Nance, M. T. (2018). The regime that FATF built: An introduction to the Financial Action Task Force. Crime, Law and Social Change, 69, 109-129. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10611-017-9747-6
Nephos Technologies. (2024). Optimising ESG Goals with AI: A Strategic Approach to Sustainability and Governance. Retrieved from https://nephostechnologies.com/blog/optimising-esg-goals-with-ai-a-strategic-approach-to-sustainability-and-governance/
Obermeyer, Z., Powers, B., Vogeli, C., & Mullainathan, S. (2019). Dissecting racial bias in an algorithm used to manage the health of populations. Science, 366(6464), 447-453. https://www.ftc.gov/system/files/documents/public_events/1548288/privacycon-2020-ziad_obermeyer.pdf
Piplai, A., Kotal, A., Mohseni, S., Gaur, M., Mittal, S., & Joshi, A. (2023). Knowledge-enhanced Neuro-Symbolic AI for Cybersecurity and Privacy. arXiv preprint arXiv:2308.02031. Retrieved from https://arxiv.org/abs/2308.02031
Ramezani, M., Takian, A., Bakhtiari, A. et al. The application of artificial intelligence in health financing: a scoping review. Cost Eff Resour Alloc 21, 83 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12962-023-00492-2
Romano, R. (2005). The Sarbanes-Oxley Act and the Making of Quack Corporate Governance. Yale Law Journal, 114(7), 1521-1611. https://openyls.law.yale.edu/bitstream/handle/20.500.13051/1191/Sarbanes_Oxley_Act_and_the_Making_of_Quack_Corporate_Governance.pdf?sequence=2
Shell Global. (2021). AI in the energy sector https://www.shell.com/business-customers/catalysts-technologies/resources-library/ai-in-energy-sector.html
Smith, A., & Johnson, R. (2024). Integrating AI into Compliance Frameworks: Challenges and Best Practices. Journal of Business Compliance, 12(3), 45-60. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10611-024-9785-2
Sobkowski, M., & Karapetyan, G. (2025). The Dawn of a New Era of Compliance: Automated Compliance Verification and Enforcement. MIT Computational Law Report. https://law.mit.edu/pub/thedawnofaneweraofcompliance
Suresh, H., & Guttag, J. V. (2021). A framework for understanding unintended consequences of machine learning. Communications of the ACM, 64(10), 62-71. https://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/143588
Visa. (2023). AI and machine learning now offer more accurate risk scoring.
Voigt, P., & von dem Bussche, A. (2017). The EU General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR): A Practical Guide. Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-57959-7
Wachter, S., Mittelstadt, B., & Floridi, L. (2017). Why a right to explanation of automated decision-making does not exist in the General Data Protection Regulation. International Data Privacy Law, 7(2), 76-99. https://philarchive.org/archive/WACTEA
Wachter, S., Mittelstadt, B., & Russell, C. (2017). "Counterfactual explanations without opening the black box: Automated decisions and the GDPR." Harvard Journal of Law & Technology, 31(2), 841-887. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1711.00399
Wang, J., Chang, V., Yu, D., Liu, C., & Ma, X. (2022). Conformance-oriented predictive process monitoring in BPaaS based on a combination of neural networks. Journal of Grid Computing, 20(3), 1-20. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10723-022-09613-2
Wissuchek, C., Zschech, P. Prescriptive analytics systems revised: a systematic literature review from an information systems perspective. Inf Syst E-Bus Manage (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10257-024-00688-w
Media Contact
Company Name: Journalist and Authors Consulting
Contact Person: Shola Obajuluwa
Email: Send Email
Phone: 00 44 1708 20 6161
Address:4 St Mathews Close
City: Rainham
State: Essex
Country: United Kingdom
Website: https://www.journalistauthors.com
