e424b4
Filed Pursuant to
Rule 424(b)(4)
Registration No. 333-171673
Prospectus
11,000,000 Shares
Common Stock
SS&C Technologies Holdings, Inc. is offering
2,000,000 shares of its common stock, and the selling
stockholders are offering 9,000,000 shares of common stock.
We will not receive any proceeds from the sale of shares by the
selling stockholders, except for the aggregate exercise price of
options held by certain selling stockholders.
Our common stock is listed on The NASDAQ Global Select Market
under the symbol SSNC. On February 3, 2011, the
closing price of our common stock as reported on The NASDAQ
Global Select Market was $17.60 per share.
Investing in our common stock involves risks. See Risk
factors beginning on page 16.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Per Share
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
Price to Public
|
|
$
|
17.60
|
|
|
$
|
193,600,000
|
|
Underwriting Discounts and Commissions
|
|
$
|
0.704
|
|
|
$
|
7,744,000
|
|
Proceeds to SS&C Holdings
|
|
$
|
16.896
|
|
|
$
|
33,792,000
|
|
Proceeds to Selling Stockholders
|
|
$
|
16.896
|
|
|
$
|
152,064,000
|
|
|
|
We have granted the underwriters the right to purchase up to an
additional 1,100,000 shares of common stock on the same
terms and conditions set forth above to cover over-allotments,
if any.
Neither the Securities and Exchange Commission nor any state
securities commission has approved or disapproved these
securities or determined if this prospectus is truthful or
complete. Any representation to the contrary is a criminal
offense.
The underwriters expect to deliver the shares to purchasers on
or about February 9, 2011.
Prospectus dated February 3,
2011
Table of
contents
|
|
|
|
|
Page
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
31
|
|
|
33
|
|
|
34
|
|
|
35
|
|
|
36
|
|
|
38
|
|
|
43
|
|
|
77
|
|
|
103
|
|
|
133
|
|
|
139
|
|
|
141
|
|
|
146
|
|
|
151
|
|
|
154
|
|
|
159
|
|
|
164
|
|
|
164
|
|
|
164
|
|
|
165
|
|
|
F-1
|
You should rely only on the information contained in this
prospectus. We have not authorized anyone to provide you with
information different from that contained in this prospectus. We
are offering to sell, and seeking offers to buy, shares of our
common stock only in jurisdictions where offers and sales are
permitted. The information in this prospectus is accurate only
as of the date of this prospectus, regardless of the time of
delivery of this prospectus or any sale of shares of our common
stock.
Prospectus
summary
This summary highlights information contained elsewhere in
this prospectus. This summary does not contain all of the
information you should consider before investing in our common
stock. You should read this entire prospectus carefully,
especially the risks of investing in our common stock discussed
under Risk factors beginning on page 16, and
our consolidated financial statements and the accompanying
notes, before making an investment decision.
Unless the context otherwise requires, in this prospectus,
(1) SS&C Holdings means SS&C
Technologies Holdings, Inc., our top-level holding company that
was formerly known as Sunshine Acquisition Corporation,
(2) SS&C means SS&C Technologies,
Inc., our primary operating company and a direct wholly owned
subsidiary of SS&C Holdings, (3) we,
us and our mean (a) prior to
November 23, 2005, SS&C and its consolidated
subsidiaries and (b) on and after November 23, 2005,
SS&C Holdings and its consolidated subsidiaries, including
SS&C, and (4) references to our common stock
include both shares of our common stock and shares of our Class
A non-voting common stock.
Overview
We are a leading provider of mission-critical, sophisticated
software products and software-enabled services that allow
financial services providers to automate complex business
processes and effectively manage their information processing
requirements. Our portfolio of software products and rapidly
deployable software-enabled services allows our clients to
automate and integrate front-office functions such as trading
and modeling, middle-office functions such as portfolio
management and reporting, and back-office functions such as
accounting, performance measurement, reconciliation, reporting,
processing and clearing. Our solutions enable our clients to
focus on core operations, better monitor and manage investment
performance and risk, improve operating efficiency and reduce
operating costs. We provide our solutions globally to more than
4,500 clients, principally within the institutional asset
management, alternative investment management and financial
institutions vertical markets.
We provide the global financial services industry with a broad
range of software-enabled services, which consist of
software-enabled outsourcing services and subscription-based
on-demand
software that are managed and hosted at our facilities, and
specialized software products, which are deployed at our
clients facilities. Our software-enabled services, which
combine the strengths of our proprietary software with our
domain expertise, enable our clients to contract with us to
provide many of their mission-critical and complex business
processes. For example, we utilize our software to offer
comprehensive fund administration services for alternative
investment managers, including fund manager services, transfer
agency services, fund of funds services, tax processing and
accounting. We offer clients the flexibility to choose from
multiple software delivery options, including on-premise
applications and hosted, multi-tenant or dedicated applications.
Our principal software products and software-enabled services
include:
|
|
|
Portfolio Management/Accounting
|
|
Fund Administration Services
|
Financial Modeling
|
|
Loan Management/Accounting
|
Trading/Treasury Operations
|
|
Money Market Processing
|
Property Management
|
Our business model is characterized by substantial contractually
recurring revenues, high operating margins and significant cash
flow. We generate revenues primarily through our high-value
software-enabled services, which are typically sold on a
long-term subscription basis and
1
integrated into our clients business processes. Our
software-enabled services are generally provided under
non-cancelable contracts with initial terms of one to five years
that require monthly or quarterly payments and are subject to
automatic annual renewal at the end of the initial term unless
terminated by either party. We also generate revenues by
licensing our software to clients through either perpetual or
term licenses and by selling maintenance services. Maintenance
services are generally provided under annually renewable
contracts. As a consequence, a significant portion of our
revenues consists of subscription payments and maintenance fees
and is contractually recurring in nature. Our pricing typically
scales as a function of our clients assets under
management, the complexity of asset classes managed and the
volume of transactions.
Our contractually recurring revenue model helps us minimize the
fluctuations in revenues and cash flows typically associated
with up-front, perpetual software license revenues and enhances
our ability to manage costs. Our contractually recurring
revenues, which we define as our software-enabled services and
maintenance revenues, increased as a percentage of total
revenues from 52% in the year ended December 31, 2000 to
85% in the year ended December 31, 2009 and to 86% in the
nine months ended September 30, 2010. We have experienced
average revenue retention rates in each of the last five years
of greater than 90% on our software-enabled services and
maintenance contracts for our core enterprise products.
Through a combination of organic growth and acquisitions, we
generated revenues of $270.9 million for the year ended
December 31, 2009 as compared to revenues of
$95.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2004,
which was the last reported fiscal year before the going-private
transaction described below. Our revenues increased from
$199.9 million in the nine months ended September 30,
2009 to $242.8 million in the nine months ended
September 30, 2010. We generated 83% of our revenues in the
nine months ended September 30, 2010 from clients in North
America and 17% from clients outside North America. Our revenues
are highly diversified, with our largest client in the nine
months ended September 30, 2010 accounting for less than 5%
of our revenues.
Our
industry
We serve a number of vertical markets within the financial
services industry, including alternative investment funds,
investment management firms, insurance companies, banks and
brokerage firms. The financial crisis negatively affected each
of these markets and contributed to a significant decline in
asset value. In particular, alternative investment funds, such
as hedge funds, experienced a shift from equities to money
market funds, treasuries and other liquid instruments. These
factors all contributed to reducing revenues among the financial
services firms, which, in turn, affected their access to credit,
spending ability and, in some cases, their long-term viability.
With improvements in the financial services industry since the
height of the financial crisis, we have experienced increased
demand for our products and services, as evidenced by the
increase in our organic revenues in the nine months ended
September 30, 2010 from the comparable period of 2009, and
we expect to benefit from continued improvements in the
financial services industry.
Asset Classes and Securities Products Growing in Volume and
Complexity. Investment professionals must increasingly
track and invest in numerous types of asset classes far more
complex than traditional equity and debt instruments. These
assets require more sophisticated systems to automate functions
such as trading and modeling, portfolio management, accounting,
performance measurement, reconciliation, reporting, processing
and clearing.
Increasing Regulatory Requirements and Investor Demand for
Transparency. Recent market and economic conditions
have led to new legislation and numerous proposals for changes
in the
2
regulation of the financial services industry. Several
high-profile scandals have also led to increased investor demand
for transparency. In addition, as the financial services
industry continues to grow in complexity, we anticipate
regulatory oversight will continue to impose new demands on
financial services providers. The expectation is that hedge
funds may start to experience similar regulatory pressures. In
addition, financial services providers continue to face
increasing regulatory oversight from domestic organizations such
as the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority,
U.S. Treasury Department, U.S. Securities and Exchange
Commission, New York Stock Exchange, National Association of
Insurance Commissioners and U.S. Department of Labor as
well as foreign regulatory bodies such as the Office of
Supervision of Financial Institutions in Ottawa, Canada,
Financial Services Association in London, England and Ministry
of Finance in Tokyo, Japan.
Increasing Willingness to Implement Solutions from
Independent Software Vendors and Outsource IT
Operations. Rather than internally developing
applications that automate business processes, many financial
services providers are implementing advanced software solutions
from independent software vendors to replace their current
systems, which are often cumbersome, time-consuming to operate
and expensive to implement, customize, update and support.
Additionally, financial services providers globally are
outsourcing a growing percentage of their business processes to
benefit from
best-in-class
process execution, focus on core operations, quickly expand into
new markets, reduce costs, streamline organizations, handle
increased transaction volumes and ensure system redundancy.
Intense Global Competition Among Financial Services
Providers. Competition within the financial services
industry has become intense as financial services providers
expand into new markets and offer new services to their clients.
In response to these increasingly competitive conditions
worldwide, financial services organizations seek to rapidly
expand into new markets, manage operational enterprise risk,
increase front-office productivity, and drive cost savings by
utilizing software to automate and integrate their
mission-critical and labor intensive business processes.
Our competitive
strengths
We believe that our position in the marketplace results from
several key competitive strengths, including:
Enhanced Capability Through Software Ownership. We
use our proprietary software products and infrastructure to
provide our software-enabled services, strengthening our overall
operating margins. Because we primarily use our own proprietary
software in the execution of our software-enabled services and
generally own and control our products source code, we can
quickly identify and deploy product improvements and respond to
client feedback.
Broad Portfolio of Products and Services Focused on Financial
Services Organizations. Our broad portfolio of over 60
software products and software-enabled services allows
professionals in the financial services industry to efficiently
and rapidly analyze and manage information, increase
productivity, devote more time to critical business decisions
and reduce costs. We provide highly flexible, scalable and
cost-effective solutions that enable our clients to track
complex securities, better employ sophisticated investment
strategies, scale efficiently and meet evolving regulatory
requirements.
Independent Fund Administration
Services. Third-party service providers in the
alternative investment market, such as auditors, fund
administrators, attorneys, custodians and prime brokers, provide
transparency of the funds assets and the valuation of
those assets. Conflicts of interest may arise when the above
parties attempt to provide more than one of these services.
3
The industry is increasingly becoming aware of these conflicts
and seeking independent fund administrators such as SS&C.
Highly Attractive Operating Model. By growing our
contractually recurring revenues from our software-enabled
services and our maintenance contracts, we gain greater
predictability in the operation of our business, reduce
volatility in our revenues and earnings, enhance our ability to
manage our business and strengthen long-term relationships with
our clients. We have designed our software and software-enabled
services to be highly scalable to accommodate significant
additional business volumes with limited incremental costs,
providing us with opportunities to improve our operating margins
and generate significant operating cash flows. We utilize a
direct sales force model that benefits from significant direct
participation by senior management and leverages the Internet as
a direct marketing medium.
Deep Domain Knowledge and Extensive Industry
Experience. As of December 31, 2010, we had
1,195 development, service and support professionals with
significant expertise across the vertical markets that we serve
and a deep working knowledge of our clients businesses. By
leveraging our domain expertise and knowledge, we have
developed, and continue to improve, our mission-critical
software products and services to enable our clients to overcome
the complexities inherent in their businesses.
Trusted Provider to Our Highly Diversified and Growing Client
Base. By providing mission-critical, reliable software
products and services for more than 20 years, we have
become a trusted provider to a large and growing installed base
within multiple segments of the financial services industry. Our
clients include some of the largest and most well-recognized
firms in the financial services industry. Our strong client
relationships provide us with a significant opportunity to sell
additional solutions to our existing clients and drive future
revenue growth at lower cost.
Superior Client Support and Focus. Our ability to
rapidly deliver improvements and our reputation for superior
service have proven to be a strong competitive advantage when
developing client relationships. We believe a close and active
service and support relationship, which we foster through our
dedicated client support teams for larger clients and through
our interactive online client community (SS&C Solution
Center), significantly enhances client satisfaction, strengthens
client relationships and furnishes us with information regarding
evolving client issues.
Our growth
strategy
We intend to be the leading provider of superior technology
solutions to the financial services industry. The key elements
of our growth strategy include:
Continue to Develop Software-Enabled Services and New
Proprietary Software. Since our founding in 1986, we
have focused on building substantial financial services domain
expertise, which enables us to respond to our clients most
complex financial, accounting, actuarial, tax and regulatory
needs. We intend to maintain and enhance our technological
leadership by using our domain expertise to build valuable new
software-enabled services, continuing to invest in internal
development and opportunistically acquiring products and
services that address the highly specialized needs of the
financial services industry. Our software-enabled services
revenues increased from $30.9 million for the year ended
December 31, 2004 to $163.3 million for the year ended
December 31, 2009, representing a compound annual growth
rate of 40%. For the nine months ended September 30, 2009
to the nine months ended September 30, 2010, our
software-enabled services revenues increased from
$120.8 million to $155.7 million.
4
Expand Our Client Base. Our client base of more than
4,500 clients represents a fraction of the total number of
financial services providers globally. As a result, we believe
there is substantial opportunity to grow our client base over
time as our products become more widely adopted and to
capitalize on the increasing adoption of mission-critical,
sophisticated software and software-enabled services by
financial services providers as they continue to replace
inadequate legacy solutions and custom in-house solutions that
are inflexible and costly to maintain.
Increase Revenues from Existing Clients. Revenues
from our existing clients generally grow along with the amount
and complexity of assets that they manage and the volume of
transactions that they execute. Many of our current clients use
our products only for a portion of their total assets under
management and investment funds, providing us with significant
opportunities to expand our business relationship and revenues.
We have been successful in, and expect to continue to focus our
marketing efforts on, providing additional modules or features
to the products and services our existing clients already use,
as well as cross-selling our other products and services.
Moreover, our high quality of service helps us maintain
significant client retention rates and longer lasting client
relationships.
Continue to Capitalize on Acquisitions of Complementary
Businesses and Technologies. We intend to continue to
employ a highly disciplined and focused acquisition strategy to
broaden and enhance our product and service offerings, expand
our intellectual property portfolio, add new clients and
supplement our internal development efforts. Our acquisitions
have enabled us to expand our product and service offerings into
new markets or client bases within the financial services
industry. We believe our acquisitions have been an extension of
our research and development effort that has enabled us to
purchase proven products and remove the uncertainties associated
with software development projects. We have a proven ability to
integrate complementary businesses as demonstrated by the 31
businesses we have acquired since 1995.
Strengthen Our International Presence. We believe
that there is a significant market opportunity to provide
software and services to financial services providers outside
North America. In the nine months ended September 30, 2010,
we generated 17% of our revenues from clients outside North
America. We are building our international operations in order
to increase our sales outside North America. We plan to expand
our international market presence by leveraging our existing
software products and software-enabled services.
Our
acquisitions
We intend to continue to employ a highly disciplined and focused
acquisition strategy to broaden and enhance our product and
service offerings, add new clients and supplement our internal
development efforts. Our acquisitions have enabled us to expand
our product and service offerings into new markets or client
bases within the financial services industry. The addition of
new products and services has also enabled us to market other
products and services to acquired client bases. We believe our
acquisitions have been an extension of our research and
development effort and have enabled us to purchase proven
products and remove the uncertainties sometimes associated with
software development projects.
Since 1995, we have acquired 31 businesses within our
industry. These acquisitions have contributed marketable
products and services, which have added to our revenues and
earnings. We believe we have generally been able to improve the
operating performance and profitability of our acquired
businesses. We seek to reduce the costs of the acquired
businesses by consolidating sales and marketing efforts and by
eliminating redundant administrative tasks and research and
development expenses. In many cases, we have also been able to
increase
5
revenues generated by acquired products and services by
leveraging our existing products and services, larger sales
capabilities and client base.
Risks associated
with our business
Our business is subject to numerous risks and uncertainties, as
more fully described under Risk factors beginning on
page 16, which you should carefully consider before
purchasing our common stock. For example:
|
|
|
Our business is greatly affected by changes in the state of the
general economy and the financial markets, and economic
uncertainty or a prolonged downturn in the general economy or
the financial services industry could adversely affect demand
for our products and services.
|
|
|
We face significant competition, which may result in price
reductions, reduced gross margins or loss of market share.
|
|
|
If we cannot attract, train and retain qualified managerial,
technical and sales personnel, we may not be able to provide
adequate technical expertise and customer service to our clients
or maintain focus on our business strategy.
|
|
|
Our substantial indebtedness could adversely affect our
financial health and prevent us from fulfilling our obligations
under our
113/4% senior
subordinated notes due 2013 and our senior credit facilities.
|
In addition, the ability of new investors to influence corporate
matters may be limited because a small number of stockholders
will beneficially own a substantial amount of our common stock
after this offering. Following the completion of this offering,
investment funds affiliated with Carlyle will beneficially own
approximately 47.1% of our common stock, and William C. Stone,
our Chairman of the Board of Directors and Chief Executive
Officer, will beneficially own approximately 23.3% of our common
stock, assuming that the underwriters do not exercise their
option to purchase additional shares.
Principal
stockholderThe Carlyle Group
The Carlyle Group, or Carlyle, is a global alternative asset
manager with $97.7 billion of assets under management
committed to 76 funds as of September 30, 2010. Carlyle
invests across three asset classes private equity,
real estate and credit alternatives in Africa, Asia,
Australia, Europe, North America and South America focusing on
aerospace & defense, automotive &
transportation, consumer & retail, energy &
power, financial services, healthcare, industrial,
infrastructure, technology & business services and
telecommunications & media. Since 1987, the firm has
invested $64.7 billion of equity in 1,015 transactions. The
Carlyle Group employs more than 900 people in 19 countries.
Carlyle deals have included the acquisitions of OpenLink
Financial, a leading provider of portfolio management software
solutions to the commodity, energy and financial services
markets, Freescale Semiconductor, Inc., one of the worlds
largest semiconductor companies, The Hertz Corporation, the
largest worldwide car rental brand, Blackboard, Inc., a leading
e-learning
platform provider, Booz Allen, a provider of management
consulting for businesses and governments, and CommScope, a
global leader in infrastructure solutions for communications
networks.
The going-private
transaction
On November 23, 2005, SS&C Holdings, a Delaware
corporation owned by investment funds affiliated with Carlyle,
acquired SS&C through the merger of Sunshine Merger
Corporation with and into SS&C, with SS&C being the
surviving company and a wholly owned subsidiary of SS&C
Holdings, and SS&Cs outstanding common stock
converted into the right to receive $37.25 per
6
share in cash (without giving effect to the
8.5-for-1
stock split of our common stock that was effected on
March 10, 2010). We refer to the acquisition of SS&C
by SS&C Holdings as the Acquisition.
The following transactions occurred in connection with the
Acquisition:
|
|
|
Carlyle capitalized SS&C Holdings with an aggregate equity
contribution of $381.0 million;
|
|
|
William C. Stone, SS&Cs Chairman of the Board and
Chief Executive Officer, contributed $165.0 million of
equity in the form of stock and rollover options, and certain
other management and employee option holders contributed
approximately $9.0 million of additional equity in the form
of rollover options, to SS&C Holdings;
|
|
|
SS&C entered into senior secured credit facilities
consisting of:
|
|
|
|
|
|
a $75.0 million revolving credit facility, of which
$10.0 million was drawn at closing; and
|
|
|
|
a $275.0 million term loan B facility, which was fully
drawn at closing and of which the equivalent of
$75.0 million was drawn in Canadian dollars by one of
SS&Cs Canadian subsidiaries;
|
|
|
|
SS&C issued and sold $205.0 million in aggregate
principal amount of
113/4%
senior subordinated notes due 2013;
|
|
|
all outstanding options to purchase shares of SS&Cs
common stock became fully vested and immediately exercisable,
and each outstanding option (other than options held by
(1) non-employee directors, (2) certain individuals
identified in a schedule to the Merger Agreement and
(3) individuals who held options that were exercisable for
fewer than 100 shares of SS&Cs common stock)
were, subject to certain conditions, assumed by SS&C
Holdings and converted into an option to acquire common stock of
SS&C Holdings; and
|
|
|
all in-the-money warrants to purchase shares of SS&Cs
common stock were cancelled in exchange for cash equal to the
excess of the transaction price over the exercise price of the
warrants.
|
In this prospectus, we refer to the Acquisition, the equity
contributions to SS&C Holdings, the offering of the senior
subordinated notes and the other transactions described above as
the Transaction.
As a result of the Transaction, as of December 31, 2010,
investment funds affiliated with Carlyle beneficially owned
approximately 59.8% of the common stock of SS&C Holdings
and William C. Stone, the Chairman of the Board and Chief
Executive Officer of each of SS&C and SS&C Holdings,
beneficially owned approximately 24.6% of the common stock of
SS&C Holdings. See Principal and selling
stockholders for additional information, including the
calculation of beneficial ownership. The term
Successor refers to us following the Acquisition,
and the term Predecessor refers to us prior to the
Acquisition.
7
The table set forth below compares the per share and aggregate
amounts contributed to SS&C Holdings by William C. Stone,
Carlyle and certain other management and employee option holders
at the time of Transaction with the implied per share and
aggregate value of the shares of our common stock at the time of
this offering, based on the public offering price of $17.60 per
share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Time of
|
|
Time of
|
|
|
Transaction
|
|
this offering
|
|
|
Per share
|
|
$8.64
|
|
$17.60
|
Aggregate
|
|
$555 million
|
|
$1,131 million
|
|
|
Recent operating
results
Our consolidated financial statements for the three months ended
December 31, 2010, our fourth fiscal quarter, are not yet
available. Our expectations with respect to our unaudited
results for the three months ended December 31, 2010 as set
forth below are based upon management estimates and are the
responsibility of SS&C Holdings. Our independent registered
public accounting firm, PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, has not
audited, reviewed, compiled or performed any procedures with
respect to this preliminary financial data and, accordingly,
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP does not express an opinion or any
other form of assurance with respect thereto. This summary is
not meant to be a comprehensive statement of our unaudited
financial results for the three months ended December 31,
2010 and our actual results may differ from these estimates.
Based on the foregoing, we estimate that revenues for the three
months ended December 31, 2010 will be between
$85.6 million and $86.1 million and that Consolidated
EBITDA for the three months ended December 31, 2010 will be
between $35.0 million and $35.5 million. For this
purpose, Consolidated EBITDA has the same definition and is
subject to the same limitations as set forth below on pages
12-14. We
have no reason to believe that our net income for the three
months ended December 31, 2010 will be materially
inconsistent with the foregoing estimates of revenues and
Consolidated EBITDA.
Additional
information
SS&C Holdings was incorporated in Delaware as Sunshine
Acquisition Corporation in July 2005 and changed its name to
SS&C Technologies Holdings, Inc. in June 2007. SS&C
was organized as a Connecticut corporation in March 1986 and
reincorporated as a Delaware corporation in April 1996. On
November 23, 2005, SS&C Holdings acquired SS&C,
as described above under The going-private
transaction. Our principal executive offices are located
at 80 Lamberton Road, Windsor, Connecticut 06095, and our
telephone number at that location is
(860) 298-4500.
Our website address is www.ssctech.com. Information contained on
our website does not constitute a part of this prospectus.
8
The
offering
|
|
|
Common stock offered by SS&C Technologies Holdings,
Inc.
|
|
2,000,000 shares |
|
Common stock offered by the selling stockholders
|
|
9,000,000 shares |
|
Total
|
|
11,000,000 shares |
|
Common stock to be outstanding after this offering
|
|
75,272,612 shares (76,372,612 shares if the over-allotment
option is exercised in full) |
|
Over-allotment option offered by SS&C Technologies
Holdings, Inc.
|
|
We have granted the underwriters a
30-day
option to purchase up to 1,100,000 shares of common stock. |
|
Use of proceeds
|
|
We estimate that we will receive approximately
$33.5 million in net proceeds from the
2,000,000 shares of common stock that we are offering based
upon the public offering price of $17.60 per share and after
deducting underwriting discounts and commissions and estimated
offering expenses payable by us. We intend to use our net
proceeds of this offering to redeem a portion of our outstanding
113/4% senior
subordinated notes due 2013 at a redemption price of 102.9375%
of the principal amount, plus accrued and unpaid interest. We
will not receive any proceeds from the sale of shares by the
selling stockholders, except for the aggregate exercise price of
options held by certain selling stockholders. See Use of
proceeds for additional information. |
|
The NASDAQ Global Select Market symbol
|
|
SSNC |
The number of shares of our common stock to be outstanding
following this offering is based on 73,272,612 shares of
our common stock outstanding as of December 31, 2010, which
includes 480,100 shares to be sold by selling stockholders
upon the exercise of outstanding options in connection with this
offering and excludes:
|
|
|
12,182,192 shares of common stock issuable upon the
exercise of stock options outstanding as of December 31,
2010 at a weighted average exercise price of $8.51 per
share;
|
|
|
1,497,711 shares of common stock reserved as of
December 31, 2010 for future issuance under our 2006 equity
incentive plan; and
|
|
|
2,361,077 shares of common stock reserved as of
December 31, 2010 for future issuance under our 2008 stock
incentive plan.
|
9
The shares of common stock offered by us and the selling
stockholders in this offering will represent 14.6% of the total
shares of common stock to be outstanding after this offering.
Unless otherwise indicated, all information in this prospectus
reflects and assumes the following:
|
|
|
no exercise of outstanding options after December 31, 2010;
|
|
|
an 8.5-for-1
stock split of our common stock that was effected on
March 10, 2010; and
|
|
|
no exercise by the underwriters of their over-allotment option.
|
10
Summary
historical financial data
The tables below summarize our historical consolidated financial
data as of and for the periods indicated. You should read the
following information together with the more detailed
information contained in Selected historical financial
data, Managements discussion and analysis of
financial condition and results of operations and our
consolidated financial statements and the accompanying notes.
On November 23, 2005, SS&C Holdings acquired SS&C
through the merger of Sunshine Merger Corporation, a wholly
owned subsidiary of SS&C Holdings, with and into SS&C,
with SS&C being the surviving company and a wholly owned
subsidiary of SS&C Holdings. We refer to the acquisition of
SS&C by SS&C Holdings as the Acquisition.
We refer to the Acquisition, together with related transactions
entered into to finance the cash consideration for the
Acquisition, to refinance certain of our existing indebtedness
and to pay related transaction fees and expenses, as the
Transaction.
The term Successor refers to us following the
Acquisition, and the term Predecessor refers to us
prior to the Acquisition. Certain financial information in this
prospectus for the Predecessor period from January 1, 2005
through November 22, 2005 and the Successor period from
November 23, 2005 through December 31, 2005 has been
presented on a combined basis. This presentation does not comply
with generally accepted accounting principles or with the rules
for pro forma presentation, but is presented because we believe
that it provides a meaningful comparison of our results. The
combined operating results may not reflect the actual results we
would have achieved absent the Transaction and may not be
predictive of future results of operations.
The as adjusted balance sheet data set forth below give effect
to the receipt by us of approximately $33.5 million in net
proceeds from the sale of 2,000,000 shares of our common
stock in this offering at the public offering price of
$17.60 per share, after deducting underwriting discounts
and commissions and estimated offering expenses payable by us,
and the use of such net proceeds and $35.1 million of our
existing cash resources to redeem $66.6 million in original
principal amount of our outstanding
113/4% senior
subordinated notes at a redemption price of 102.9375% of the
principal amount, plus accrued and unpaid interest. The as
adjusted balance sheet also gives effect to our receipt of the
aggregate exercise price for the 480,100 shares of common
stock to be acquired by certain of the selling stockholders upon
exercise of options in connection with this offering, a loss on
extinguishment of debt of approximately $2.9 million,
including a $2.0 million redemption premium and a non-cash
charge of approximately $0.9 million relating to the
write-off of deferred financing fees attributable to the
redeemed notes and the related tax effects of the above.
11
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Combined1
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
January 1
|
|
|
|
November 23
|
|
|
Year
|
|
|
Year
|
|
|
Year
|
|
|
Year
|
|
|
Year
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
through
|
|
|
|
through
|
|
|
ended
|
|
|
ended
|
|
|
ended
|
|
|
ended
|
|
|
ended
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
(In thousands,
|
|
November 22,
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
except per share data)
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(unaudited)
|
|
|
(unaudited)
|
|
Statement of operations data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Software licenses
|
|
$
|
20,147
|
|
|
|
$
|
3,587
|
|
|
$
|
23,734
|
|
|
$
|
22,925
|
|
|
$
|
27,514
|
|
|
$
|
24,844
|
|
|
$
|
20,661
|
|
|
$
|
15,632
|
|
|
$
|
17,629
|
|
Maintenance
|
|
|
44,064
|
|
|
|
|
3,701
|
|
|
|
47,765
|
|
|
|
55,222
|
|
|
|
61,910
|
|
|
|
65,178
|
|
|
|
66,099
|
|
|
|
48,565
|
|
|
|
54,130
|
|
Professional services
|
|
|
12,565
|
|
|
|
|
2,520
|
|
|
|
15,085
|
|
|
|
19,582
|
|
|
|
17,491
|
|
|
|
24,352
|
|
|
|
20,889
|
|
|
|
14,872
|
|
|
|
15,384
|
|
Software-enabled services
|
|
|
67,193
|
|
|
|
|
7,857
|
|
|
|
75,050
|
|
|
|
107,740
|
|
|
|
141,253
|
|
|
|
165,632
|
|
|
|
163,266
|
|
|
|
120,801
|
|
|
|
155,652
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues
|
|
|
143,969
|
|
|
|
|
17,665
|
|
|
|
161,634
|
|
|
|
205,469
|
|
|
|
248,168
|
|
|
|
280,006
|
|
|
|
270,915
|
|
|
|
199,870
|
|
|
|
242,795
|
|
Total cost of revenues
|
|
|
59,004
|
|
|
|
|
7,627
|
|
|
|
66,631
|
|
|
|
100,016
|
|
|
|
128,882
|
|
|
|
142,433
|
|
|
|
137,740
|
|
|
|
102,394
|
|
|
|
122,439
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
84,965
|
|
|
|
|
10,038
|
|
|
|
95,003
|
|
|
|
105,453
|
|
|
|
119,286
|
|
|
|
137,573
|
|
|
|
133,175
|
|
|
|
97,476
|
|
|
|
120,356
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling, marketing, general and administrative
|
|
|
25,078
|
|
|
|
|
2,504
|
|
|
|
27,582
|
|
|
|
37,964
|
|
|
|
44,274
|
|
|
|
45,686
|
|
|
|
39,559
|
|
|
|
29,912
|
|
|
|
38,075
|
|
Research and development
|
|
|
19,199
|
|
|
|
|
2,071
|
|
|
|
21,270
|
|
|
|
23,620
|
|
|
|
26,282
|
|
|
|
26,804
|
|
|
|
26,513
|
|
|
|
19,593
|
|
|
|
23,486
|
|
Merger costs
|
|
|
36,912
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
36,912
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses
|
|
|
81,189
|
|
|
|
|
4,575
|
|
|
|
85,764
|
|
|
|
61,584
|
|
|
|
70,556
|
|
|
|
72,490
|
|
|
|
66,072
|
|
|
|
49,505
|
|
|
|
61,561
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income
|
|
|
3,776
|
|
|
|
|
5,463
|
|
|
|
9,239
|
|
|
|
43,869
|
|
|
|
48,730
|
|
|
|
65,083
|
|
|
|
67,103
|
|
|
|
47,971
|
|
|
|
58,795
|
|
Interest income
|
|
|
1,031
|
|
|
|
|
30
|
|
|
|
1,061
|
|
|
|
388
|
|
|
|
939
|
|
|
|
409
|
|
|
|
28
|
|
|
|
24
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
(2,092
|
)
|
|
|
|
(4,920
|
)
|
|
|
(7,012
|
)
|
|
|
(47,427
|
)
|
|
|
(45,463
|
)
|
|
|
(41,539
|
)
|
|
|
(36,891
|
)
|
|
|
(27,815
|
)
|
|
|
(23,827
|
)
|
Other (expense) income, net
|
|
|
655
|
|
|
|
|
258
|
|
|
|
913
|
|
|
|
456
|
|
|
|
1,911
|
|
|
|
1,994
|
|
|
|
(1,418
|
)
|
|
|
(1,256
|
)
|
|
|
653
|
|
Loss on extinguishment of debt
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5,480
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before income taxes
|
|
|
3,370
|
|
|
|
|
831
|
|
|
|
4,201
|
|
|
|
(2,714
|
)
|
|
|
6,117
|
|
|
|
25,947
|
|
|
|
28,822
|
|
|
|
18,924
|
|
|
|
30,150
|
|
Provision (benefit) for income taxes
|
|
|
2,658
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,658
|
|
|
|
(3,789
|
)
|
|
|
(458
|
)
|
|
|
7,146
|
|
|
|
9,804
|
|
|
|
5,928
|
|
|
|
6,913
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
712
|
|
|
|
$
|
831
|
|
|
$
|
1,543
|
|
|
$
|
1,075
|
|
|
$
|
6,575
|
|
|
$
|
18,801
|
|
|
$
|
19,018
|
|
|
$
|
12,996
|
|
|
$
|
23,237
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings per
share2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$
|
0.03
|
|
|
|
$
|
0.01
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
0.02
|
|
|
$
|
0.11
|
|
|
$
|
0.31
|
|
|
$
|
0.31
|
|
|
$
|
0.22
|
|
|
$
|
0.34
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted
|
|
$
|
0.03
|
|
|
|
$
|
0.01
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
0.02
|
|
|
$
|
0.10
|
|
|
$
|
0.30
|
|
|
$
|
0.30
|
|
|
$
|
0.21
|
|
|
$
|
0.32
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average shares
outstanding2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
23,300
|
|
|
|
|
60,138
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
60,172
|
|
|
|
60,245
|
|
|
|
60,284
|
|
|
|
60,381
|
|
|
|
60,378
|
|
|
|
67,919
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
24,478
|
|
|
|
|
62,167
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
62,182
|
|
|
|
63,382
|
|
|
|
63,700
|
|
|
|
63,653
|
|
|
|
63,132
|
|
|
|
71,499
|
|
Other financial data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recurring revenue
percentage3
|
|
|
77.3%
|
|
|
|
|
65.4%
|
|
|
|
76.0%
|
|
|
|
79.3%
|
|
|
|
81.9%
|
|
|
|
82.4%
|
|
|
|
84.7%
|
|
|
|
84.7%
|
|
|
|
86.4%
|
|
Consolidated
EBITDA4
|
|
$
|
64,989
|
|
|
|
$
|
8,588
|
|
|
$
|
73,577
|
|
|
$
|
83,998
|
|
|
$
|
98,667
|
|
|
$
|
115,566
|
|
|
$
|
119,266
|
|
|
$
|
82,979
|
|
|
$
|
99,579
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of September 30, 2010
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
Actual
|
|
|
As adjusted
|
|
|
|
|
|
(unaudited)
|
|
|
(unaudited)
|
|
|
Balance sheet data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
86,975
|
|
|
$
|
54,213
|
|
Working capital
|
|
|
71,064
|
|
|
|
40,415
|
|
Total assets
|
|
|
1,245,639
|
|
|
|
1,213,290
|
|
113/4% senior
subordinated notes due 2013
|
|
|
133,250
|
|
|
|
66,625
|
|
Senior credit facility, including current portion
|
|
|
157,072
|
|
|
|
157,072
|
|
Total stockholders equity
|
|
|
828,489
|
|
|
|
863,930
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
Our combined results for the year
ended December 31, 2005 represent the addition of the
Predecessor period from January 1, 2005 through
November 22, 2005 and the Successor period from
November 23, 2005 through December 31, 2005. This
combination does not comply with generally accepted accounting
principles (GAAP) or with the rules for pro forma presentation,
but is presented because we believe it provides the most
meaningful comparison of our results.
|
|
(2)
|
|
Amounts for the Predecessor period
are computed based upon the capital structure in existence prior
to the Acquisition. Amounts for the Successor periods are
computed based upon the capital structure in existence
subsequent to the Acquisition.
|
|
(3)
|
|
Recurring revenue percentage
represents software-enabled services revenues and maintenance
revenues as a percentage of total revenues. We do not believe
that the recurring revenue percentage for the Successor period
of 2005 is meaningful because such period is only five weeks in
duration and not indicative of our overall trends.
|
|
(4)
|
|
Consolidated EBITDA is a non-GAAP
financial measure used in key financial covenants contained in
our senior credit facilities, which are material facilities
supporting our capital structure and providing liquidity to our
business. Consolidated EBITDA is defined as earnings before
interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization (EBITDA), further
adjusted to exclude unusual items and other adjustments
permitted in calculating covenant compliance under our senior
credit facilities. We believe that the inclusion of
supplementary adjustments to EBITDA applied in presenting
Consolidated EBITDA is appropriate to provide additional
information to investors to demonstrate compliance with the
specified financial ratios and other financial condition tests
contained in our senior credit facilities.
|
|
|
|
Management uses Consolidated EBITDA
to gauge the costs of our capital structure on a day-to-day
basis when full financial statements are unavailable. Management
further believes that providing this information allows our
investors greater transparency and a better understanding of our
ability to meet our debt service obligations and make capital
expenditures.
|
|
|
|
Any breach of covenants in our
senior credit facilities that are tied to ratios based on
Consolidated EBITDA could result in a default under that
agreement, in which case the lenders could elect to declare all
amounts borrowed due and payable and to terminate any
commitments they have to provide further borrowings. Any such
acceleration would also result in a default under our indenture.
Any default and subsequent acceleration of payments under our
debt agreements would have a material adverse effect on our
results of operations, financial position and cash flows.
Additionally, under our debt agreements, our ability to engage
in activities such as incurring additional indebtedness, making
investments and paying dividends is also tied to ratios based on
Consolidated EBITDA.
|
|
|
|
Consolidated EBITDA does not
represent net income or cash flow from operations as those terms
are defined by GAAP and does not necessarily indicate whether
cash flows will be sufficient to fund cash needs. Further, our
senior credit facilities require that Consolidated EBITDA be
calculated for the most recent four fiscal quarters. As a
result, the measure can be disproportionately affected by a
particularly strong or weak quarter. Further, it may not be
comparable to the measure for any subsequent four-quarter period
or any complete fiscal year.
|
|
|
|
Consolidated EBITDA is not a
recognized measurement under GAAP, and investors should not
consider Consolidated EBITDA as a substitute for measures of our
financial performance and liquidity as determined in accordance
with GAAP, such as net income, operating income or net cash
provided by operating activities. Because other companies may
calculate Consolidated EBITDA differently than we do,
Consolidated EBITDA may not be comparable to similarly titled
measures reported by other companies. Consolidated EBITDA has
other limitations as an analytical tool, when compared to the
use of net income, which is the most directly comparable GAAP
financial measure, including:
|
|
|
|
Consolidated EBITDA
does not reflect the provision of income tax expense in our
various jurisdictions;
|
|
|
|
Consolidated EBITDA
does not reflect the significant interest expense we incur as a
result of our debt leverage;
|
|
|
|
Consolidated EBITDA
does not reflect any attribution of costs to our operations
related to our investments and capital expenditures through
depreciation and amortization charges;
|
|
|
|
Consolidated EBITDA
does not reflect the cost of compensation we provide to our
employees in the form of stock option awards; and
|
|
|
|
Consolidated EBITDA
excludes expenses that we believe are unusual or non-recurring,
but which others may believe are normal expenses for the
operation of a business.
|
13
The following is a reconciliation of net income to EBITDA and
Consolidated EBITDA:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Combineda
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Period
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Period
|
|
|
|
from
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
from
|
|
|
|
November 23,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Twelve
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
January 1
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
Year
|
|
|
Year
|
|
|
Year
|
|
|
Year
|
|
|
Year
|
|
|
Months
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
through
|
|
|
|
through
|
|
|
ended
|
|
|
ended
|
|
|
ended
|
|
|
ended
|
|
|
ended
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
November 22,
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010b
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(unaudited)
|
|
|
(unaudited)
|
|
|
(unaudited)
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
712
|
|
|
|
$
|
831
|
|
|
$
|
1,543
|
|
|
$
|
1,075
|
|
|
$
|
6,575
|
|
|
$
|
18,801
|
|
|
$
|
19,018
|
|
|
$
|
29,259
|
|
|
$
|
12,996
|
|
|
$
|
23,237
|
|
Interest expense,
netc
|
|
|
1,061
|
|
|
|
|
4,890
|
|
|
|
5,951
|
|
|
|
47,039
|
|
|
|
44,524
|
|
|
|
41,130
|
|
|
|
36,863
|
|
|
|
38,370
|
|
|
|
27,791
|
|
|
|
29,298
|
|
Income taxes
|
|
|
2,658
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,658
|
|
|
|
(3,789
|
)
|
|
|
(458
|
)
|
|
|
7,146
|
|
|
|
9,804
|
|
|
|
10,789
|
|
|
|
5,928
|
|
|
|
6,913
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
9,575
|
|
|
|
|
2,301
|
|
|
|
11,876
|
|
|
|
27,128
|
|
|
|
35,047
|
|
|
|
35,038
|
|
|
|
36,028
|
|
|
|
39,677
|
|
|
|
26,707
|
|
|
|
30,356
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EBITDA
|
|
|
14,006
|
|
|
|
|
8,022
|
|
|
|
22,028
|
|
|
|
71,453
|
|
|
|
85,668
|
|
|
|
102,115
|
|
|
|
101,713
|
|
|
|
118,095
|
|
|
|
73,422
|
|
|
|
89,804
|
|
Purchase accounting
adjustmentsd
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
616
|
|
|
|
616
|
|
|
|
3,017
|
|
|
|
(296
|
)
|
|
|
(289
|
)
|
|
|
(93
|
)
|
|
|
(54
|
)
|
|
|
(163
|
)
|
|
|
(124
|
)
|
Merger costs
|
|
|
36,912
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
36,912
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital-based taxes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,841
|
|
|
|
1,721
|
|
|
|
1,212
|
|
|
|
795
|
|
|
|
984
|
|
|
|
672
|
|
|
|
861
|
|
Unusual or non-recurring charges
(income)e
|
|
|
(737
|
)
|
|
|
|
(242
|
)
|
|
|
(979
|
)
|
|
|
1,485
|
|
|
|
(1,718
|
)
|
|
|
1,480
|
|
|
|
1,990
|
|
|
|
(142
|
)
|
|
|
1,683
|
|
|
|
(449
|
)
|
Acquired EBITDA and cost
savingsf
|
|
|
14,808
|
|
|
|
|
85
|
|
|
|
14,893
|
|
|
|
1,147
|
|
|
|
135
|
|
|
|
2,379
|
|
|
|
8,053
|
|
|
|
2,121
|
|
|
|
2,025
|
|
|
|
192
|
|
Stock-based compensation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,871
|
|
|
|
10,979
|
|
|
|
7,323
|
|
|
|
5,607
|
|
|
|
10,425
|
|
|
|
4,363
|
|
|
|
9,181
|
|
Otherg
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
107
|
|
|
|
107
|
|
|
|
1,184
|
|
|
|
2,158
|
|
|
|
1,346
|
|
|
|
1,201
|
|
|
|
338
|
|
|
|
977
|
|
|
|
114
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated EBITDA
|
|
$
|
64,989
|
|
|
|
$
|
8,588
|
|
|
$
|
73,577
|
|
|
$
|
83,998
|
|
|
$
|
98,667
|
|
|
$
|
115,566
|
|
|
$
|
119,266
|
|
|
$
|
131,767
|
|
|
$
|
82,979
|
|
|
$
|
99,579
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a)
|
|
Our combined results for the year
ended December 31, 2005 represent the addition of the
Predecessor period from January 1, 2005 through
November 22, 2005 and the Successor period from
November 23, 2005 through December 31, 2005. This
combination does not comply with GAAP or with the rules for pro
forma presentation, but is presented because we believe it
provides the most meaningful comparison of our results.
|
|
(b)
|
|
Results for the twelve months ended
September 30, 2010 are included because our senior credit
facilities require the calculation of our consolidated total
leverage and consolidated net interest coverage ratio for the
prior four consecutive quarters. With the exception of acquired
EBITDA and cost savings, our results for the twelve months ended
September 30, 2010 are calculated based on our results for
the year ended December 31, 2009, in addition to our
results for the nine months ended September 30, 2010, less
our results for the nine months ended September 30, 2009.
|
|
(c)
|
|
Interest expense includes any loss
on extinguishment of debt shown as a separate line item on the
statement of operations.
|
|
(d)
|
|
Purchase accounting adjustments
include (1) an adjustment to increase revenues by the
amount that would have been recognized if deferred revenue were
not adjusted to fair value at the date of the Transaction and
(2) an adjustment to increase rent expense by the amount
that would have been recognized if lease obligations were not
adjusted to fair value at the date of the Transaction.
|
|
(e)
|
|
Unusual or non-recurring charges
include foreign currency transaction gains and losses, expenses
related to our prior proposed public offering, severance
expenses associated with workforce reduction, gains and losses
on the sales of marketable securities, equity earnings and
losses on investments, proceeds and payments associated with
legal and other settlements, costs associated with the closing
of a regional office and other one-time gains and expenses.
|
|
(f)
|
|
Acquired EBITDA and cost savings
reflects the EBITDA impact of significant businesses that were
acquired during the period as if the acquisition occurred at the
beginning of the period and cost savings to be realized from
such acquisitions.
|
|
(g)
|
|
Other includes management fees and
related expenses paid to Carlyle and the non-cash portion of
straight-line rent expense.
|
14
Consolidated
EBITDA and consolidated leverage ratios
Our senior credit facilities require us to maintain both a
maximum consolidated total leverage to Consolidated EBITDA ratio
(currently no more than 5.50) and a minimum Consolidated EBITDA
to consolidated net interest coverage ratio (currently not less
than 2.25), in each case calculated for the trailing four
quarters.
The table below summarizes our Consolidated EBITDA, consolidated
total leverage ratio and consolidated net interest coverage
ratio for the periods presented.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Combined1
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Twelve months
|
|
|
Twelve months
|
|
|
|
Twelve months
|
|
|
Twelve months
|
|
|
Twelve months
|
|
|
Twelve months
|
|
|
Twelve months
|
|
|
ended
|
|
|
ended
|
|
|
|
ended
|
|
|
ended
|
|
|
ended
|
|
|
ended
|
|
|
ended
|
|
|
September 30, 2010
|
|
|
September 30, 2010
|
|
(In thousands, except ratio data)
|
|
December 31, 2005
|
|
|
December 31, 2006
|
|
|
December 31, 2007
|
|
|
December 31, 2008
|
|
|
December 31, 2009
|
|
|
(Actual)
|
|
|
(As
adjusted)6
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated
EBITDA2
|
|
$
|
73,577
|
|
|
$
|
83,998
|
|
|
$
|
98,667
|
|
|
$
|
115,566
|
|
|
$
|
119,266
|
|
|
$
|
131,767
|
|
|
$
|
131,767
|
|
Consolidated total leverage to Consolidated EBITDA ratio
(current maximum covenant level:
5.50)3
|
|
|
6.43
|
|
|
|
5.48
|
|
|
|
4.30
|
|
|
|
3.28
|
|
|
|
3.17
|
|
|
|
1.98
|
|
|
|
1.47
|
|
Consolidated EBITDA to consolidated net interest coverage ratio
(current minimum covenant
level: 2.25)4
|
|
|
10.87
|
5
|
|
|
1.88
|
|
|
|
2.34
|
|
|
|
2.98
|
|
|
|
3.45
|
|
|
|
4.30
|
|
|
|
5.77
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
Our combined results for the year
ended December 31, 2005 represent the addition of the
Predecessor period from January 1, 2005 through
November 22, 2005 and the Successor period from
November 23, 2005 through December 31, 2005. This
combination does not comply with GAAP or with the rules for pro
forma presentation, but is presented because we believe it
provides the most meaningful comparison of our results.
|
|
(2)
|
|
We reconcile our Consolidated
EBITDA for the trailing four quarters to net income for the same
period using the same methods set forth above.
|
|
(3)
|
|
Consolidated total leverage ratio
is defined in our senior credit facilities at the last day of
any period of four consecutive fiscal quarters, as the ratio of
(a) the principal amount of all debt at such date, minus
the amount, up to a maximum amount of $30.0 million, of
cash and cash equivalents to (b) Consolidated EBITDA. The
current maximum consolidated total leverage ratio is 5.50. The
maximum consolidated total leverage ratio for 2010 and 2009 was
5.50, for 2008 was 6.00, for 2007 was 6.75 and for 2006 was
7.50. There was no maximum consolidated total leverage ratio
covenant prior to June 30, 2006.
|
|
(4)
|
|
Consolidated net interest coverage
ratio is defined in our senior credit facilities as for any
period, the ratio of (a) Consolidated EBITDA for such
period to (b) total cash interest expense for such period
with respect to all outstanding indebtedness minus total cash
interest income for such period. The current minimum
consolidated net interest coverage ratio is 2.25. The minimum
consolidated net interest coverage ratio for 2010 and 2009 was
2.00, for 2008 was 1.70, for 2007 was 1.50 and for 2006 was
1.40. There was no minimum consolidated net interest coverage
ratio covenant prior to June 30, 2006.
|
|
(5)
|
|
This ratio is not comparable
because we did not incur debt under our existing senior credit
facilities until November 2005 in connection with the
Transaction.
|
|
(6)
|
|
As adjusted to give effect to the
receipt by us of approximately $33.5 million in net
proceeds from the sale of 2,000,000 shares of our common
stock in this offering at the public offering price of
$17.60 per share, after deducting underwriting discounts
and commissions and estimated offering expenses payable by us,
and the use of such net proceeds and $35.1 million of our
existing cash resources to redeem $66.6 million in original
principal amount of our outstanding
113/4% senior
subordinated notes at a redemption price of 102.9375% of the
principal amount, plus accrued and unpaid interest. The as
adjusted data also give effect to our receipt of the aggregate
exercise price for the 480,100 shares of common stock to be
acquired by certain of the selling stockholders upon exercise of
options in connection with this offering.
|
15
Risk
factors
Investing in our common stock involves a high degree of risk.
You should carefully consider the following risk factors, as
well as the other information in this prospectus, before
deciding whether to invest in our common stock. If any of the
following risks occur, our business, financial condition and
operating results could be materially affected. The trading
price of our common stock could decline as a result of any of
these risks, and you might lose all or part of your investment
in our common stock.
Risks relating to
our business
Our business
is greatly affected by changes in the state of the general
economy and the financial markets, and economic uncertainty or a
prolonged downturn in the general economy or the financial
services industry could adversely affect the demand for our
products and services.
As widely reported, global credit and financial markets have
experienced extreme disruptions over the past several years,
including severely diminished liquidity and credit availability,
declines in consumer confidence, declines in economic growth,
increases in unemployment rates, and uncertainty about economic
stability. These factors have caused and could continue to cause
our clients or prospective clients to delay or reduce purchases
of our products, and our revenues could be adversely affected.
Fluctuations in the value of assets under our clients
management could also adversely affect our revenues. Unfavorable
economic conditions or continuing economic uncertainty could
make it difficult for our clients to obtain credit on reasonable
terms or at all, preventing them from making desired purchases
of our products and services, and may impair the ability of our
clients to pay for products they have purchased. We cannot
predict the timing or duration of any economic downturn,
generally, or in the markets in which our businesses operate.
Continued turbulence in the U.S. and international markets,
renewed concern about the strength and sustainability of a
recovery, particularly given the risk of sovereign debt defaults
by European Union member countries, and prolonged declines in
business consumer spending could materially adversely affect our
liquidity and financial condition, and the liquidity and
financial condition of our clients.
Our clients include a range of organizations in the financial
services industry whose success is linked to the health of the
economy generally and of the financial markets specifically. As
a result, we believe that fluctuations, disruptions,
instability, downturns or uncertainty in the general economy and
the financial services industry could adversely affect demand
for our products and services. For example, such fluctuations,
disruptions, instability, downturns or uncertainty may cause our
clients to do the following:
|
|
|
cancel or reduce planned expenditures for our products and
services;
|
|
process fewer transactions through our software-enabled services;
|
|
seek to lower their costs by renegotiating their contracts with
us;
|
|
move their IT solutions in-house;
|
|
switch to lower-priced solutions provided by our
competitors; or
|
|
exit the industry.
|
If such conditions occur and persist, our business and financial
results, including our liquidity and our ability to fulfill our
obligations to the holders of our
113/4% senior
subordinated notes
16
due 2013, which we refer to as the notes or senior subordinated
notes, and our other lenders, could be materially adversely
affected.
Further or
accelerated consolidations and failures in the financial
services industry could adversely affect our results of
operations due to a resulting decline in demand for our products
and services.
If banks and financial services firms fail or continue to
consolidate, there could be a decline in demand for our products
and services. Failures, mergers and consolidations of banks and
financial institutions reduce the number of our clients and
potential clients, which could adversely affect our revenues
even if these events do not reduce the aggregate activities of
the consolidated entities. Further, if our clients fail
and/or merge
with or are acquired by other entities that are not our clients,
or that use fewer of our products and services, they may
discontinue or reduce their use of our products and services. It
is also possible that the larger financial institutions
resulting from mergers or consolidations would have greater
leverage in negotiating terms with us. In addition, these larger
financial institutions could decide to perform in-house some or
all of the services that we currently provide or could provide
or to consolidate their processing on a non-SS&C system.
The resulting decline in demand for our products and services
could have a material adverse effect on our revenues.
If we are
unable to retain and attract clients, our revenues and net
income would remain stagnant or decline.
If we are unable to keep existing clients satisfied, sell
additional products and services to existing clients or attract
new clients, then our revenues and net income would remain
stagnant or decline. A variety of factors could affect our
ability to successfully retain and attract clients, including:
|
|
|
the level of demand for our products and services;
|
|
|
the level of client spending for information technology;
|
|
|
the level of competition from internal client solutions and from
other vendors;
|
|
|
the quality of our client service;
|
|
|
our ability to update our products and services and develop new
products and services needed by clients;
|
|
|
our ability to understand the organization and processes of our
clients; and
|
|
|
our ability to integrate and manage acquired businesses.
|
We face
significant competition with respect to our products and
services, which may result in price reductions, reduced gross
margins or loss of market share.
The market for financial services software and services is
competitive, rapidly evolving and highly sensitive to new
product and service introductions and marketing efforts by
industry participants. The market is also highly fragmented and
served by numerous firms that target only local markets or
specific client types. We also face competition from information
systems developed and serviced internally by the IT departments
of financial services firms.
17
Some of our current and potential competitors have significantly
greater financial, technical, distribution and marketing
resources, generate higher revenues and have greater name
recognition. Our current or potential competitors may develop
products comparable or superior to those developed by us, or
adapt more quickly to new technologies, evolving industry trends
or changing client or regulatory requirements. It is also
possible that alliances among competitors may emerge and rapidly
acquire significant market share. Increased competition may
result in price reductions, reduced gross margins and loss of
market share. Accordingly, our business may not grow as expected
and may decline.
Catastrophic
events may adversely affect our ability to provide, our
clients ability to use, and the demand for, our products
and services, which may disrupt our business and cause a decline
in revenues.
A war, terrorist attack, natural disaster or other catastrophe
may adversely affect our business. A catastrophic event could
have a direct negative impact on us or an indirect impact on us
by, for example, affecting our clients, the financial markets or
the overall economy and reducing our ability to provide, our
clients ability to use, and the demand for, our products
and services. The potential for a direct impact is due primarily
to our significant investment in infrastructure. Although we
maintain redundant facilities and have contingency plans in
place to protect against both man-made and natural threats, it
is impossible to fully anticipate and protect against all
potential catastrophes. A computer virus, security breach,
criminal act, military action, power or communication failure,
flood, severe storm or the like could lead to service
interruptions and data losses for clients, disruptions to our
operations, or damage to important facilities. In addition, such
an event may cause clients to cancel their agreements with us
for our products or services. Any of these events could cause a
decline in our revenues.
Our
software-enabled services may be subject to disruptions that
could adversely affect our reputation and our
business.
Our software-enabled services maintain and process confidential
data on behalf of our clients, some of which is critical to
their business operations. For example, our trading systems
maintain account and trading information for our clients and
their customers. There is no guarantee that the systems and
procedures that we maintain to protect against unauthorized
access to such information are adequate to protect against all
security breaches. If our software-enabled services are
disrupted or fail for any reason, or if our systems or
facilities are infiltrated or damaged by unauthorized persons,
our clients could experience data loss, financial loss, harm to
their reputation and significant business interruption. If that
happens, we may be exposed to unexpected liability, our clients
may leave, our reputation may be tarnished, and client
dissatisfaction and lost business may result.
We may not
achieve the anticipated benefits from our acquisitions and may
face difficulties in integrating our acquisitions, which could
adversely affect our revenues, subject us to unknown
liabilities, increase costs and place a significant strain on
our management.
We have acquired and intend in the future to acquire companies,
products or technologies that we believe could complement or
expand our business, augment our market coverage, enhance our
technical capabilities or otherwise offer growth opportunities.
However, acquisitions could subject us to contingent or unknown
liabilities, and we may have to incur debt or severance
liabilities or write off investments, infrastructure costs or
other assets.
18
Our success is also dependent on our ability to complete the
integration of the operations of acquired businesses in an
efficient and effective manner. Successful integration in the
rapidly changing financial services software and services
industry may be more difficult to accomplish than in other
industries. We may not realize the benefits we anticipate from
acquisitions, such as lower costs or increased revenues. We may
also realize such benefits more slowly than anticipated, due to
our inability to:
|
|
|
combine operations, facilities and differing firm cultures;
|
|
|
retain the clients or employees of acquired entities;
|
|
|
generate market demand for new products and services;
|
|
|
coordinate geographically dispersed operations and successfully
adapt to the complexities of international operations;
|
|
|
integrate the technical teams of these companies with our
engineering organization;
|
|
|
incorporate acquired technologies and products into our current
and future product lines; and
|
|
|
integrate the products and services of these companies with our
business, where we do not have distribution, marketing or
support experience for these products and services.
|
Integration may not be smooth or successful. The inability of
management to successfully integrate the operations of acquired
companies could disrupt our ongoing operations, divert
management from day-to-day responsibilities, increase our
expenses and harm our operating results or financial condition.
Such acquisitions may also place a significant strain on our
administrative, operational, financial and other resources. To
manage growth effectively, we must continue to improve our
management and operational controls, enhance our reporting
systems and procedures, integrate new personnel and manage
expanded operations. If we are unable to manage our growth and
the related expansion in our operations from recent and future
acquisitions, our business may be harmed through a decreased
ability to monitor and control effectively our operations and a
decrease in the quality of work and innovation of our employees.
Certain of our acquisitions have generated disputes with
stockholders or management of acquired companies that have
required the expenditure of our resources to address or have led
to litigation; any such disputes may reduce the value we hope to
realize from our acquisitions, either by increasing our costs of
the acquisition, reducing our opportunities to realize revenues
from the acquisition or imposing litigation costs or adverse
judgments on us.
We expect that
our operating results, including our profit margins and
profitability, may fluctuate over time.
Historically, our revenues, profit margins and other operating
results have fluctuated from period to period and over time
primarily due to the timing, size and nature of our license and
service transactions. Additional factors that may lead to such
fluctuation include:
|
|
|
the timing of the introduction and the market acceptance of new
products, product enhancements or services by us or our
competitors;
|
|
|
the lengthy and often unpredictable sales cycles of large client
engagements;
|
19
|
|
|
the amount and timing of our operating costs and other expenses;
|
|
|
the financial health of our clients;
|
|
|
changes in the value of assets under our clients
management;
|
|
|
cancellations of maintenance
and/or
software-enabled services arrangements by our clients;
|
|
|
changes in local, national and international regulatory
requirements;
|
|
|
changes in our personnel;
|
|
|
implementation of our licensing contracts and software-enabled
services arrangements;
|
|
|
changes in economic and financial market conditions; and
|
|
|
changes in the mix in the types of products and services we
provide.
|
If we cannot
attract, train and retain qualified managerial, technical and
sales personnel, we may not be able to provide adequate
technical expertise and customer service to our clients or
maintain focus on our business strategy.
We believe that our success is due in part to our experienced
management team. We depend in large part upon the continued
contribution of our senior management and, in particular,
William C. Stone, our Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of
our Board of Directors. Losing the services of one or more
members of our senior management could significantly delay or
prevent the achievement of our business objectives.
Mr. Stone has been instrumental in developing our business
strategy and forging our business relationships since he founded
the company in 1986. We maintain no key man life insurance
policies for Mr. Stone or any other senior officer or
manager.
Our success is also dependent upon our ability to attract, train
and retain highly skilled technical and sales personnel. Loss of
the services of these employees could materially affect our
operations. Competition for qualified technical personnel in the
software industry is intense, and we have, at times, found it
difficult to attract and retain skilled personnel for our
operations.
Locating candidates with the appropriate qualifications,
particularly in the desired geographic location and with the
necessary subject matter expertise, is difficult. Our failure to
attract and retain a sufficient number of highly skilled
employees could prevent us from developing and servicing our
products at the same levels as our competitors and we may,
therefore, lose potential clients and suffer a decline in
revenues.
If we are
unable to protect our proprietary technology, our success and
our ability to compete will be subject to various risks, such as
third-party infringement claims, unauthorized use of our
technology, disclosure of our proprietary information or
inability to license technology from third
parties.
Our success and ability to compete depends in part upon our
ability to protect our proprietary technology. We rely on a
combination of trade secret, copyright and trademark law,
nondisclosure agreements and technical measures to protect our
proprietary technology. We have registered trademarks for some
of our products and will continue to evaluate the registration
of additional trademarks as appropriate. We generally enter into
confidentiality
20
and/or
license agreements with our employees, distributors, clients and
potential clients. We seek to protect our software,
documentation and other written materials under trade secret and
copyright laws, which afford only limited protection. These
efforts may be insufficient to prevent third parties from
asserting intellectual property rights in our technology.
Furthermore, it may be possible for unauthorized third parties
to copy portions of our products or to reverse engineer or
otherwise obtain and use our proprietary information, and third
parties may assert ownership rights in our proprietary
technology.
Existing patent and copyright laws afford only limited
protection. Third parties may develop substantially equivalent
or superseding proprietary technology, or competitors may offer
equivalent products in competition with our products, thereby
substantially reducing the value of our proprietary rights.
There are many patents in the financial services field. As a
result, we are subject to the risk that others will claim that
the important technology we have developed, acquired or
incorporated into our products will infringe the rights,
including the patent rights, such persons may hold. These
claims, if successful, could result in a material loss of our
intellectual property rights. Expensive and time-consuming
litigation may be necessary to protect our proprietary rights.
We incorporate open source software into a limited number of our
software solutions. We monitor our use of open source software
to avoid subjecting our products to conditions we do not intend.
Although we believe that we have complied with our obligations
under the applicable licenses for open source software that we
use, there is little or no legal precedent governing the
interpretation of many of the terms of certain of these
licenses. Therefore, the potential impact of these terms is
uncertain and may result in unanticipated obligations or
restrictions regarding those of our products, technologies or
solutions affected.
We have acquired and may acquire important technology rights
through our acquisitions and have often incorporated and may
incorporate features of this technology across many products and
services. As a result, we are subject to the above risks and the
additional risk that the seller of the technology rights may not
have appropriately protected the intellectual property rights we
acquired. Indemnification and other rights under applicable
acquisition documents are limited in term and scope and
therefore provide us with only limited protection.
In addition, we currently use certain third-party software in
providing some of our products and services, such as industry
standard databases and report writers. If we lost our licenses
to use such software or if such licenses were found to infringe
upon the rights of others, we would need to seek alternative
means of obtaining the licensed software to continue to provide
our products or services. Our inability to replace such
software, or to replace such software in a timely manner, could
have a negative impact on our operations and financial results.
We could
become subject to litigation regarding intellectual property
rights, which could seriously harm our business and require us
to incur significant costs, which, in turn, could reduce or
eliminate profits.
In recent years, there has been significant litigation in the
United States involving patents and other intellectual property
rights. We may be a party to litigation in the future to enforce
our intellectual property rights or as a result of an allegation
that we infringe others intellectual property rights,
including patents, trademarks and copyrights. From time to time
we have received notices claiming our technology may infringe
third-party intellectual property rights or otherwise
threatening to assert intellectual property rights. Any parties
asserting that our products or services infringe upon their
proprietary rights could force us to defend ourselves
21
and possibly our clients against the alleged infringement. These
claims and any resulting lawsuit, if successful, could subject
us to significant liability for damages and invalidation of our
proprietary rights. These lawsuits, regardless of their success,
could be time-consuming and expensive to resolve, adversely
affect our revenues, profitability and prospects and divert
management time and attention away from our operations. We may
be required to re-engineer our products or services or obtain a
license of third-party technologies on unfavorable terms.
Our failure to
continue to derive substantial revenues from the licensing of,
or the provision of
software-enabled
services related to, our CAMRA, TradeThru, Pacer, AdvisorWare
and Total Return software, and the provision of maintenance
and professional services in support of such licensed software,
could adversely affect our ability to sustain or grow our
revenues and harm our business, financial condition and
results of operations.
The licensing of, and the provision of software-enabled
services, maintenance and professional services relating to, our
CAMRA, TradeThru, Pacer, AdvisorWare and Total Return software
accounted for approximately 54% of our revenues for the year
ended December 31, 2009 and approximately 43% of our
revenues for the nine months ended September 30, 2010. We
expect that the revenues from these software products and
services will continue to account for a significant portion of
our total revenues for the foreseeable future. As a result,
factors adversely affecting the pricing of or demand for such
products and services, such as competition or technological
change, could have a material adverse effect on our ability to
sustain or grow our revenues and harm our business, financial
condition and results of operations.
We may be
unable to adapt to rapidly changing technology and evolving
industry standards and regulatory requirements, and our
inability to introduce new products and services could result in
a loss of market share.
Rapidly changing technology, evolving industry standards and
regulatory requirements and new product and service
introductions characterize the market for our products and
services. Our future success will depend in part upon our
ability to enhance our existing products and services and to
develop and introduce new products and services to keep pace
with such changes and developments and to meet changing client
needs. The process of developing our software products is
extremely complex and is expected to become increasingly complex
and expensive in the future due to the introduction of new
platforms, operating systems and technologies. Our ability to
keep up with technology and business and regulatory changes is
subject to a number of risks, including that:
|
|
|
we may find it difficult or costly to update our services and
software and to develop new products and services quickly enough
to meet our clients needs;
|
|
|
we may find it difficult or costly to make some features of our
software work effectively and securely over the Internet or with
new or changed operating systems;
|
|
|
we may find it difficult or costly to update our software and
services to keep pace with business, evolving industry
standards, regulatory and other developments in the industries
where our clients operate; and
|
|
|
we may be exposed to liability for security breaches that allow
unauthorized persons to gain access to confidential information
stored on our computers or transmitted over our network.
|
22
Our failure to enhance our existing products and services and to
develop and introduce new products and services to promptly
address the needs of the financial markets could adversely
affect our business and results of operations.
Undetected
software design defects, errors or failures may result in loss
of our clients data, litigation against us and harm to our
reputation and business.
Our software products are highly complex and sophisticated and
could contain design defects or software errors that are
difficult to detect and correct. Errors or bugs may result in
loss of client data or require design modifications. We cannot
assure you that, despite testing by us and our clients, errors
will not be found in new products, which errors could result in
data unavailability, loss or corruption of client assets,
litigation and other claims for damages against us. The cost of
defending such a lawsuit, regardless of its merit, could be
substantial and could divert managements attention from
ongoing operations of the company. In addition, if our business
liability insurance coverage proves inadequate with respect to a
claim or future coverage is unavailable on acceptable terms or
at all, we may be liable for payment of substantial damages. Any
or all of these potential consequences could have an adverse
impact on our operating results and financial condition.
Challenges in
maintaining and expanding our international operations can
result in increased costs, delayed sales efforts and uncertainty
with respect to our intellectual property rights and results of
operations.
For the years ended December 31, 2007, 2008 and 2009 and
the nine months ended September 30, 2010, international
revenues accounted for 41%, 39%, 36% and 32%, respectively, of
our total revenues. We sell certain of our products, such as
Altair and Pacer, primarily outside the United States. Our
international business may be subject to a variety of risks,
including:
|
|
|
changes in a specific countrys or regions political
or economic condition;
|
|
|
difficulties in obtaining U.S. export licenses;
|
|
|
potentially longer payment cycles;
|
|
|
increased costs associated with maintaining international
marketing efforts;
|
|
|
foreign currency fluctuations;
|
|
|
the introduction of non-tariff barriers and higher duty rates;
|
|
|
foreign regulatory compliance; and
|
|
|
difficulties in enforcement of third-party contractual
obligations and intellectual property rights.
|
Such factors could have a material adverse effect on our ability
to meet our growth and revenue projections and negatively affect
our results of operations.
23
Risks relating to
our indebtedness
Our
substantial indebtedness could adversely affect our financial
health and prevent us from fulfilling our obligations under our
113/4% senior
subordinated notes due 2013 and our senior credit
facilities.
We have incurred a significant amount of indebtedness. As of
December 31, 2010, we had total indebtedness of
$290.8 million and additional available borrowings of
$75.0 million under our revolving credit facility. Our
total indebtedness consisted of $133.3 million of
113/4% senior
subordinated notes due 2013 and $157.5 million of secured
indebtedness under our term loan B facility.
Our substantial indebtedness could have important consequences.
For example, it could:
|
|
|
make it more difficult for us to satisfy our obligations with
respect to our notes and our senior credit facilities;
|
|
|
require us to dedicate a substantial portion of our cash flow
from operations to payments on our indebtedness, thereby
reducing the availability of our cash flow to fund acquisitions,
working capital, capital expenditures, research and development
efforts and other general corporate purposes;
|
|
|
increase our vulnerability to and limit our flexibility in
planning for, or reacting to, changes in our business and the
industry in which we operate;
|
|
|
expose us to the risk of increased interest rates as borrowings
under our senior credit facilities are subject to variable rates
of interest;
|
|
|
place us at a competitive disadvantage compared to our
competitors that have less debt; and
|
|
|
limit our ability to borrow additional funds.
|
In addition, the indenture governing the notes and the agreement
governing our senior credit facilities contain financial and
other restrictive covenants that limit our ability to engage in
activities that may be in our long-term best interests. Our
failure to comply with those covenants could result in an event
of default which, if not cured or waived, could result in the
acceleration of all of our debts.
To service our
indebtedness, we require a significant amount of cash. Our
ability to generate cash depends on many factors beyond our
control.
We are currently obligated to make periodic principal and
interest payments on our senior and subordinated debt of
approximately $21.3 million annually. Our ability to make
payments on and to refinance our indebtedness and to fund
planned capital expenditures will depend on our ability to
generate cash in the future. This, to a certain extent, is
subject to general economic, financial, competitive,
legislative, regulatory and other factors that are beyond our
control.
We cannot assure you that our business will generate sufficient
cash flow from operations or that future borrowings will be
available to us under our senior credit facilities in an amount
sufficient to enable us to pay our indebtedness or to fund our
other liquidity needs. We may need to refinance all or a portion
of our indebtedness on or before maturity. We cannot assure you
that we will be able to refinance any of our indebtedness,
including our senior credit facilities and the notes, on
commercially reasonable terms or at all. If we cannot service
our
24
indebtedness, we may have to take actions such as selling
assets, seeking additional equity or reducing or delaying
capital expenditures, strategic acquisitions, investments and
alliances. We cannot assure you that any such actions, if
necessary, could be effected on commercially reasonable terms or
at all.
Despite
current indebtedness levels, we and our subsidiaries may still
be able to incur substantially more debt. This could further
exacerbate the risks associated with our substantial financial
leverage.
We and our subsidiaries may be able to incur substantial
additional indebtedness in the future because the terms of the
indenture governing the notes and our senior credit facilities
do not fully prohibit us or our subsidiaries from doing so.
Subject to covenant compliance and certain conditions, our
senior credit facilities permit additional borrowing, including
borrowing up to $75.0 million under our revolving credit
facility. If new debt is added to our and our subsidiaries
current debt levels, the related risks that we and they now face
could intensify.
Restrictive
covenants in the indenture governing the notes and the agreement
governing our senior credit facilities may restrict our ability
to pursue our business strategies.
The indenture governing the notes and the agreement governing
our senior credit facilities limit SS&Cs ability,
among other things, to:
|
|
|
incur additional indebtedness;
|
|
sell assets, including capital stock of restricted subsidiaries;
|
|
agree to payment restrictions affecting SS&Cs
restricted subsidiaries;
|
|
pay dividends;
|
|
consolidate, merge, sell or otherwise dispose of all or
substantially all of SS&Cs assets;
|
|
make strategic acquisitions;
|
|
enter into transactions with SS&Cs affiliates;
|
|
incur liens; and
|
|
designate any of SS&Cs subsidiaries as unrestricted
subsidiaries.
|
In addition, our senior credit facilities include other
covenants which, subject to permitted exceptions, prohibit us
from making capital expenditures in excess of certain
thresholds, making investments, loans and other advances,
engaging in sale-leaseback transactions, entering into
speculative hedging agreements, and prepaying our other
indebtedness while indebtedness under our senior credit
facilities is outstanding. The agreement governing our senior
credit facilities also requires us to maintain compliance with a
leverage ratio and an interest coverage ratio. Our ability to
comply with these ratios may be affected by events beyond our
control. See Description of certain
indebtednessSenior credit facilities for additional
information.
The restrictions contained in the indenture governing the notes
and the agreement governing our senior credit facilities could
limit our ability to plan for or react to market conditions,
meet capital needs, acquire companies, products or technologies,
or otherwise restrict our activities or business plans.
25
A breach of any of these restrictive covenants or our inability
to comply with the required financial ratios could result in a
default under the agreement governing our senior credit
facilities. If such a default occurs, the lenders under our
senior credit facilities may elect to:
|
|
|
declare all borrowings outstanding, together with accrued
interest and other fees, to be immediately due and
payable; or
|
|
|
prevent us from making payments on the notes,
|
either of which would result in an event of default under the
notes. The lenders also have the right in these circumstances to
terminate any commitments they have to provide further
borrowings. If we are unable to repay outstanding borrowings
when due, the lenders under our senior credit facilities also
have the right to proceed against the collateral, including our
available cash, granted to them to secure the indebtedness. If
the indebtedness under our senior credit facilities and the
notes were to be accelerated, we cannot assure you that our
assets would be sufficient to repay in full that indebtedness
and our other indebtedness.
We may not
have the ability to raise the funds necessary to finance the
change of control offer required by the indenture governing the
notes.
Upon the occurrence of certain specific kinds of change of
control events, we will be required to offer to repurchase all
outstanding notes at 101% of the principal amount thereof plus
accrued and unpaid interest and liquidated damages, if any, to
the date of repurchase. However, it is possible that we will not
have sufficient funds at the time of the change of control to
repurchase the notes at the required price or that restrictions
in our senior credit facilities will not allow such repurchases.
In addition, certain important corporate events, such as
leveraged recapitalizations that would increase the level of our
indebtedness, would not constitute a Change of
Control under the indenture governing the notes.
SS&C
Holdings is a holding company with no operations or assets of
its own and its ability to pay dividends is limited or otherwise
restricted.
SS&C Holdings has no direct operations and no significant
assets other than the stock of SS&C. Our ability to pay
dividends is limited by our status as a holding company and by
the terms of the indenture governing our notes and the agreement
governing our senior credit facilities, which significantly
restrict the ability of our subsidiaries to pay dividends or
otherwise transfer assets to SS&C Holdings. See Risk
factorsRisks relating to our indebtednessRestrictive
covenants in the indenture governing the notes and the agreement
governing our senior credit facilities may restrict our ability
to pursue our business strategies. Moreover, even in the
absence of any such restrictions, none of the subsidiaries of
SS&C Holdings is obligated to make funds available to
SS&C Holdings for the payment of dividends or otherwise. In
addition, Delaware law imposes requirements that may restrict
the ability of our subsidiaries, including SS&C, to pay
dividends to SS&C Holdings. Also, SS&C Holdings has
no ability to acquire businesses or property or conduct other
business activities directly. These limitations could reduce
our attractiveness to investors.
26
Risks relating to
this offering and ownership of our common stock
If equity
research analysts do not publish or cease publishing research or
reports about our business or if they issue unfavorable
commentary or downgrade our common stock, the price and trading
volume of our common stock could decline.
The trading market for our common stock is influenced by the
research and reports that equity research analysts publish about
us and our business. We do not control these analysts. The price
of our stock could decline if one or more equity analysts
downgrade our stock or if those analysts issue other unfavorable
commentary or cease publishing reports about us or our business.
If any equity research analyst who covers us or may cover us in
the future were to cease coverage of our company or fail to
regularly publish reports on us, we could lose visibility in the
financial markets, which in turn could cause our stock price or
trading volume to decline.
The market
price of our common stock may be volatile, which could result in
substantial losses for investors purchasing shares in this
offering.
Shares of our common stock were sold in our initial public
offering, or IPO, at a price of $15.00 per share on
March 31, 2010, and our common stock has subsequently
traded as high as $21.95 and as low as $13.27. An active, liquid
and orderly market for our common stock may not be sustained,
which could depress the trading price of our common stock. In
addition, the market price of our common stock may fluctuate
significantly. Some of the factors that may cause the market
price of our common stock to fluctuate include:
|
|
|
fluctuations in our quarterly financial results or the quarterly
financial results of companies perceived to be similar to us;
|
|
|
changes in estimates of our financial results or recommendations
by securities analysts;
|
|
|
failure of any of our products to achieve or maintain market
acceptance;
|
|
|
changes in market valuations of similar companies;
|
|
|
success of competitive products;
|
|
|
changes in our capital structure, such as future issuances of
securities or the incurrence of additional debt;
|
|
|
announcements by us or our competitors of significant products,
contracts, acquisitions or strategic alliances;
|
|
|
regulatory developments in the United States, foreign countries
or both;
|
|
|
litigation involving our company, our general industry or both;
|
|
|
additions or departures of key personnel;
|
|
|
investors general perception of us; and
|
|
|
changes in general economic, industry and market conditions.
|
In addition, if the market for technology stocks or the stock
market in general experiences a loss of investor confidence, the
trading price of our common stock could decline for reasons
unrelated to our business, financial condition or results of
operations. If any of the foregoing
27
occurs, it could cause our stock price to fall and may expose us
to class action lawsuits that, even if unsuccessful, could be
costly to defend and a distraction to management.
A significant
portion of our total outstanding shares may be sold into the
public market in the near future, which could cause the market
price of our common stock to drop significantly, even if our
business is doing well.
Based on shares outstanding as of December 31, 2010, upon
completion of this offering, we will have 75,272,612 shares
of our common stock outstanding, which includes
480,100 shares to be sold by selling stockholders upon the
exercise of outstanding options in connection with this
offering. Of these shares, the shares of common stock sold in
our IPO are, and the shares sold in this offering will be,
freely tradable, except for any shares purchased by our
affiliates as defined in Rule 144 of the
Securities Act of 1933. We and all of our directors and officers
and certain other stockholders and holders of options to
purchase shares of our common stock, who collectively owned
66,143,147 shares of our common stock (including vested
options and the shares of our common stock to be sold by the
selling stockholders in this offering) on December 31,
2010, have signed
lock-up
agreements under which they have agreed not to sell, transfer or
dispose of, directly or indirectly, any shares of our common
stock or any securities exercisable or exchangeable for shares
of our common stock without the prior written consent of
J.P. Morgan Securities LLC for a period of 90 days,
subject to a possible extension under certain circumstances,
after the date of this prospectus. After expiration of the
lock-up
period, these shares may be sold into the public market, subject
to prior registration or qualification for an exemption from
registration, including, in the case of shares held by
affiliates, compliance with the volume restrictions of
Rule 144 of the Securities Act of 1933. To the extent that
any of these stockholders sell, or indicate an intent to sell,
substantial amounts of our common stock in the public after the
contractual
lock-ups and
other legal restrictions on resale discussed in this prospectus
lapse, the trading price of our common stock could decline
significantly.
In addition, (i) the 12,182,192 shares subject to
outstanding options as of December 31, 2010, and
(ii) the 3,858,788 shares reserved for future issuance
under our equity compensation plans as of December 31,
2010, will become eligible for sale in the public market in the
future, subject to certain legal and contractual limitations. If
these additional shares are sold, or if it is perceived that
they will be sold, in the public market, the price of our common
stock could decline substantially.
A few
significant stockholders control the direction of our business.
If the ownership of our common stock continues to be highly
concentrated, it will prevent you and other stockholders from
influencing significant corporate decisions.
Following the completion of this offering, investment funds
affiliated with Carlyle will beneficially own approximately
47.1% of our common stock, and William C. Stone, our Chairman of
the Board and Chief Executive Officer, will beneficially own
approximately 23.3% of our common stock, assuming that the
underwriters do not exercise their option to purchase additional
shares. We are also party to a stockholders agreement with
Carlyle and Mr. Stone, pursuant to which Carlyle and
Mr. Stone have agreed to vote in favor of nominees to our
board of directors nominated by each other. As a result, Carlyle
and Mr. Stone will continue to exercise control over
matters requiring stockholder approval and our policy and
affairs. See Certain relationships and related
transactionsStockholders agreement.
28
The presence of Carlyles nominees on our board of
directors may result in a delay or the deterrence of possible
changes in control of our company, which may reduce the market
price of our common stock. The interests of our existing
stockholders may conflict with the interests of our other
stockholders. Additionally, Carlyle and its affiliates are in
the business of making investments in companies, and from time
to time acquire interests in businesses that directly or
indirectly compete with certain portions of our business or are
suppliers or clients of ours.
Our management
has broad discretion in the use of our existing cash resources
and may not use such funds effectively.
Our management will continue to have broad discretion in the
application of our cash resources. Accordingly, you will have to
rely upon the judgment of our management with respect to our
existing cash resources, with only limited information
concerning managements specific intentions. Our management
may spend our cash resources in ways that our stockholders may
not desire or that may not yield a favorable return. The failure
by our management to apply these funds effectively could harm
our business.
Provisions in
our certificate of incorporation and bylaws might discourage,
delay or prevent a change of control of our company or changes
in our management and, therefore, depress the trading price of
our common stock.
Provisions of our certificate of incorporation and bylaws and
Delaware law may discourage, delay or prevent a merger,
acquisition or other change in control that stockholders may
consider favorable, including transactions in which you might
otherwise receive a premium for your shares of our common stock.
These provisions may also prevent or frustrate attempts by our
stockholders to replace or remove our management. These
provisions include:
|
|
|
limitations on the removal of directors;
|
|
|
a classified board of directors so that not all members of our
board are elected at one time;
|
|
|
advance notice requirements for stockholder proposals and
nominations;
|
|
|
the inability of stockholders to call special meetings;
|
|
|
the ability of our board of directors to make, alter or repeal
our bylaws;
|
|
|
the ability of our board of directors to designate the terms of
and issue new series of preferred stock without stockholder
approval, which could be used to institute a rights plan, or a
poison pill, that would work to dilute the stock ownership of a
potential hostile acquirer, likely preventing acquisitions that
have not been approved by our board of directors; and
|
|
|
a prohibition on stockholders from acting by written consent if
William C. Stone, investment funds affiliated with Carlyle, and
certain transferees of Carlyle cease to collectively hold a
majority of our outstanding common stock.
|
The existence of the foregoing provisions and anti-takeover
measures could limit the price that investors might be willing
to pay in the future for shares of our common stock. They could
also deter potential acquirers of our company, thereby reducing
the likelihood that you could receive a premium for your common
stock in an acquisition.
See Description of capital stockAnti-takeover
provisions for additional information on the anti-takeover
measures applicable to us.
29
Our management
is required to devote significant time to public company
compliance requirements. This may divert managements
attention from the growth and operation of the
business.
The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and rules subsequently
implemented by the Securities and Exchange Commission and The
NASDAQ Global Select Market, impose a number of requirements on
public companies, including provisions regarding corporate
governance practices. Our management and other personnel devote
a significant amount of time to compliance with these
requirements. Moreover, these rules and regulations may make
some activities time-consuming and costly. For example, these
rules and regulations may make it more difficult and more
expensive for us to obtain director and officer liability
insurance, and we may be required to accept reduced policy
limits and coverage or incur substantial additional costs to
maintain the same or similar coverage. These rules and
regulations may also make it more difficult for us to attract
and retain qualified persons to serve on our board of directors,
our board committees or as executive officers.
In addition, the Sarbanes-Oxley Act requires, among other
things, that we maintain effective internal control over
financial reporting and disclosure controls and procedures. In
particular, we perform system and process evaluation and testing
of our internal control over financial reporting to allow
management to report on the effectiveness of our internal
control over financial reporting, as required by
Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act. Our testing, or the
subsequent testing by our independent registered public
accounting firm, may reveal deficiencies in our internal control
over financial reporting that are deemed to be material
weaknesses. Our compliance with Section 404 requires that
we expend significant management time on compliance-related
issues. Moreover if we or our independent registered public
accounting firm identify deficiencies in our internal control
over financial reporting that are deemed to be material
weaknesses, the market price of our common stock could decline
and we could be subject to sanctions or investigations by The
NASDAQ Global Select Market, the Securities and Exchange
Commission or other regulatory authorities, which would require
additional financial and management resources.
30
Forward-looking
statements
This prospectus includes statements that are, or may be deemed
to be, forward-looking statements. These
forward-looking statements can be identified by the use of
forward-looking terminology, including the terms
believes, estimates,
anticipates, plans, expects,
intends, may, will or
should or, in each case, their negative or other
variations or comparable terminology. These forward-looking
statements include all matters that are not historical facts.
They appear in a number of places throughout this prospectus and
include statements regarding our intentions, beliefs or current
expectations concerning, among other things, our results of
operations, financial condition, liquidity, prospects, growth,
technology and strategies and the industry in which we operate.
By their nature, forward-looking statements involve risks and
uncertainties because they relate to events and depend on
circumstances that may or may not occur in the future. We
caution you that forward-looking statements are not guarantees
of future performance and that our actual results of operations,
financial condition and liquidity, and the development of the
industry in which we operate may differ materially from those
made in or suggested by the forward-looking statements contained
in this prospectus. In addition, even if our results of
operations, financial condition and liquidity, and the
development of the industry in which we operate, are consistent
with the forward-looking statements contained in this
prospectus, those results or developments may not be indicative
of results or developments in subsequent periods.
The following list represents some, but not all, of the factors
that may cause actual results to differ from those anticipated
or predicted:
|
|
|
the effect of a prolonged downturn in the general economy or the
financial services industry;
|
|
|
the effect of any further or accelerated consolidations in the
financial services industry;
|
|
|
our ability to retain and attract clients and key personnel;
|
|
|
the integration of acquired businesses;
|
|
|
our ability to continue to derive substantial revenues from the
licensing of, or provision of software-enabled services relating
to, certain of our licensed software, and the provision of
maintenance and professional services in support of such
licensed software;
|
|
|
our ability to adapt to rapidly changing technology and evolving
industry standards, and our ability to introduce new products
and services;
|
|
|
challenges in maintaining and expanding our international
operations;
|
|
|
the effects of war, terrorism and other catastrophic events;
|
|
|
the risk of increased interest rates due to the variable rates
of interest on certain of our indebtedness; and
|
|
|
other risks and uncertainties, including those listed under the
caption Risk factors.
|
You should also carefully read the factors described in the
Risk factors section of this prospectus to better
understand the risks and uncertainties inherent in our business
and underlying any forward-looking statements.
31
Any forward-looking statements that we make in this prospectus
speak only as of the date of such statement, and we undertake no
obligation to update such statements except as required by law.
Comparisons of results for current and any prior periods are not
intended to express any future trends or indications of future
performance, unless expressed as such, and should only be viewed
as historical data.
32
Use of
proceeds
We estimate that we will receive approximately
$33.5 million in net proceeds from the
2,000,000 shares of common stock that we are offering based
upon the public offering price of $17.60 per share, and
after deducting underwriting discounts and commissions and
estimated offering expenses payable by us. We will also receive
proceeds of approximately $2.3 million from the exercise of
stock options by certain selling stockholders in connection with
this offering. If the underwriters exercise their over-allotment
option in full, we estimate our net proceeds from this offering
will be approximately $52.1 million. We will not receive
any proceeds from the sale of shares of common stock offered by
the selling stockholders, except for the aggregate exercise
price of the selling stockholder options, as noted above.
We intend to use our net proceeds from this offering to redeem a
portion of our outstanding
113/4%
senior subordinated notes due 2013, at a redemption price of
102.9375% of the principal amount, plus accrued and unpaid
interest.
We may not redeem more than 50% of the aggregate principal
amount of notes outstanding without a waiver from the lenders
under our senior credit facilities. If we redeem 50% of the
aggregate principal amount of the notes, we will redeem
$66.6 million in principal amount of notes for
$68.6 million in cash, plus accrued and unpaid interest.
This redemption will result in a loss on extinguishment of debt
of approximately $2.9 million in the period in which the
notes are redeemed, which includes a $2.0 million
redemption premium and a non-cash charge of approximately
$0.9 million relating to the write-off of deferred
financing fees attributable to the redeemed notes. For each
$1.0 million decrease in the principal amount redeemed, we
will pay $1.0 million less in cash to redeem the notes.
33
Price range of
common stock
Our common stock began trading on The NASDAQ Global Select
Market under the symbol SSNC on March 31, 2010.
Before then, there was no public market for our common stock.
The following table sets forth, for the periods indicated, the
high and low sales prices of our common stock as reported by The
NASDAQ Global Select Market:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
High
|
|
|
Low
|
|
|
|
|
First Quarter 2010 (beginning March 31, 2010)
|
|
$
|
16.34
|
|
|
$
|
15.01
|
|
Second Quarter 2010
|
|
$
|
18.41
|
|
|
$
|
14.45
|
|
Third Quarter 2010
|
|
$
|
18.36
|
|
|
$
|
13.27
|
|
Fourth Quarter 2010
|
|
$
|
21.95
|
|
|
$
|
15.65
|
|
First Quarter 2011 (through February 3, 2011)
|
|
$
|
21.00
|
|
|
$
|
17.49
|
|
|
|
On February 3, 2011, the closing price as reported on The
NASDAQ Global Select Market of our common stock was
$17.60 per share. As of December 31, 2010, we had
approximately 24 holders of record of our common stock.
34
Dividend
policy
We do not expect to pay dividends on our common stock for the
foreseeable future. Instead, we anticipate that all of our
earnings in the foreseeable future will be used for the
operation and growth of our business. Our ability to pay
dividends to holders of our common stock is limited as a
practical matter by our senior credit facilities and the
indenture governing our notes, insofar as we may seek to pay
dividends out of funds made available to us by our subsidiaries,
because our debt instruments directly or indirectly impose
certain limitations on our subsidiaries ability to pay
dividends or make loans to us. In particular, SS&C is only
permitted to pay dividends or advances to us in limited
circumstances and, subject to compliance with specified
financial ratios, in amounts determined by reference to, among
other things, consolidated net income. Any future determination
to pay dividends on our common stock is subject to the
discretion of our board of directors and will depend upon
various factors, including our results of operations, financial
condition, liquidity requirements, restrictions that may be
imposed by applicable law and our contracts, and other factors
deemed relevant by our board of directors. See
Managements discussion and analysis of financial
condition and results of operations and note 6 to our
consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this
prospectus.
35
Capitalization
The following table sets forth our cash and cash equivalents and
capitalization as of September 30, 2010, as follows:
|
|
|
on an actual basis; and
|
|
on an as adjusted basis to reflect:
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
the receipt by us of approximately $33.5 million in net
proceeds from the sale of 2,000,000 shares of common stock
that we are offering at the public offering price of
$17.60 per share, after deducting underwriting discounts
and commissions and estimated offering expenses payable by us,
the use of such net proceeds and $35.1 million of our
existing cash resources to redeem $66.6 million in original
principal amount of our outstanding
113/4% senior
subordinated notes due 2013 at a redemption price of 102.9375%
of the principal amount, plus accrued and unpaid interest, a
loss on extinguishment of debt of approximately
$2.9 million, including a $2.0 million redemption
premium and a non-cash charge of approximately $0.9 million
relating to the write-off of deferred financing fees
attributable to the redeemed notes and the related tax effect of
the loss on extinguishment of debt; and
|
|
|
(2)
|
the issuance of 480,100 shares of common stock upon the
exercise of options held by certain selling stockholders in
connection with this offering and the receipt of the aggregate
exercise price for such options and the associated tax effect of
the exercises.
|
You should read the following table in conjunction with our
consolidated financial statements and the accompanying notes and
the sections entitled Selected historical financial
data and Managements discussion and analysis
of financial condition and results of operations appearing
elsewhere in this prospectus.
36
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2010
|
|
(In thousands, except per share
data)
|
|
Actual
|
|
|
As adjusted
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
86,975
|
|
|
$
|
54,213
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior credit facilities
|
|
$
|
157,072
|
|
|
$
|
157,072
|
|
113/4% senior
subordinated notes due 2013
|
|
|
133,250
|
|
|
|
66,625
|
|
Capital leases
|
|
|
82
|
|
|
|
82
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total debt, including current portion
|
|
|
290,404
|
|
|
|
223,779
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders equity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock, par value $0.01 per share; 5,000 shares
authorized and no shares issued or outstanding, actual and as
adjusted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, par value $0.01 per share; 100,000 shares
authorized and 71,773 shares issued and 71,285 shares
outstanding, actual; 74,253 shares issued and
73,765 shares outstanding, as adjusted
|
|
|
718
|
|
|
|
743
|
|
Class A non-voting common stock, par value $0.01 per
share; 5,000 shares authorized and 791 shares issued
and outstanding, of which 154 are unvested, actual and as
adjusted
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
Additional paid-in capital
|
|
|
740,302
|
|
|
|
777,461
|
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income
|
|
|
23,743
|
|
|
|
23,743
|
|
Retained earnings
|
|
|
69,537
|
|
|
|
67,794
|
|
Less: cost of common stock in treasury, 407 shares
|
|
|
5,819
|
|
|
|
5,819
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity
|
|
|
828,489
|
|
|
|
863,930
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total capitalization, including current portion of long-term debt
|
|
$
|
1,118,893
|
|
|
$
|
1,087,709
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The preceding table excludes:
|
|
|
12,939,329 shares of common stock issuable upon the
exercise of stock options outstanding as of September 30,
2010 at a weighted average exercise price of $8.43 per
share;
|
|
|
1,475,041 shares of common stock reserved as of
September 30, 2010 for future issuance under our 2006
equity incentive plan; and
|
|
|
2,322,827 shares of common stock reserved as of
September 30, 2010 for future issuance under our 2008 stock
incentive plan.
|
37
Selected
historical financial data
You should read the selected historical consolidated financial
data with Managements discussion and analysis of
financial condition and results of operations and our
consolidated financial statements and the accompanying notes.
The selected consolidated financial data as of December 31,
2008 and 2009 and for the fiscal years ended December 31,
2007, 2008 and 2009 have been derived from our consolidated
financial statements included elsewhere in this prospectus,
which have been audited by PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, an
independent registered public accounting firm. The selected
consolidated financial data as of December 31, 2005, 2006
and 2007, for the periods from January 1, 2005 through
November 22, 2005 and from November 23, 2005 through
December 31, 2005 and for the fiscal year ended
December 31, 2006 have been derived from audited
consolidated financial statements not included in this
prospectus. The selected consolidated financial data as of
September 30, 2010 and for the nine months ended
September 30, 2009 and 2010 have been derived from our
unaudited consolidated financial statements included elsewhere
in this prospectus. Our unaudited consolidated financial
statements for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 and
2010 have been prepared on the same basis as the annual
consolidated financial statements and include all adjustments,
which include only normal recurring adjustments, necessary for
fair presentation of this data in all material respects. Our
historical results may not be indicative of the operating
results to be expected in any future periods, and our results
for any interim period may not be indicative of the operating
results to be expected for a full fiscal year.
On November 23, 2005, SS&C Holdings acquired SS&C
through the merger of Sunshine Merger Corporation, a wholly
owned subsidiary of SS&C Holdings, with and into SS&C,
with SS&C being the surviving company and a wholly owned
subsidiary of SS&C Holdings. We refer to the acquisition of
SS&C by SS&C Holdings as the Acquisition.
We refer to the Acquisition, together with related transactions
entered into to finance the cash consideration for the
Acquisition, to refinance certain of our existing indebtedness
and to pay related transaction fees and expenses, as the
Transaction.
The term Successor refers to us following the
Acquisition, and the term Predecessor refers to us
prior to the Acquisition. Our combined results of operations for
the year ended December 31, 2005 represent the addition of
the Predecessor period from January 1, 2005 through
November 22, 2005 and the Successor period from
November 23, 2005 through December 31, 2005. This
combination does not comply with generally accepted accounting
principles or with the rules for pro forma presentation, but is
presented because we believe it provides a meaningful comparison
of our results. The combined operating results may not reflect
the actual results we would have achieved absent the Transaction
and may not be predictive of future results of operations.
38
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Period from
|
|
|
|
Period from
|
|
|
Combined
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
|
January 1,
|
|
|
|
November 23,
|
|
|
Year
|
|
|
Year
|
|
|
Year
|
|
|
Year
|
|
|
Year
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005 through
|
|
|
|
2005 through
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
|
November 22,
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
(In thousands, except per share and percentage data)
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(unaudited)
|
|
|
(unaudited)
|
|
Statement of operations data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Software licenses
|
|
$
|
20,147
|
|
|
|
$
|
3,587
|
|
|
$
|
23,734
|
|
|
$
|
22,925
|
|
|
$
|
27,514
|
|
|
$
|
24,844
|
|
|
$
|
20,661
|
|
|
$
|
15,632
|
|
|
$
|
17,629
|
|
Maintenance
|
|
|
44,064
|
|
|
|
|
3,701
|
|
|
|
47,765
|
|
|
|
55,222
|
|
|
|
61,910
|
|
|
|
65,178
|
|
|
|
66,099
|
|
|
|
48,565
|
|
|
|
54,130
|
|
Professional services
|
|
|
12,565
|
|
|
|
|
2,520
|
|
|
|
15,085
|
|
|
|
19,582
|
|
|
|
17,491
|
|
|
|
24,352
|
|
|
|
20,889
|
|
|
|
14,872
|
|
|
|
15,384
|
|
Software-enabled services
|
|
|
67,193
|
|
|
|
|
7,857
|
|
|
|
75,050
|
|
|
|
107,740
|
|
|
|
141,253
|
|
|
|
165,632
|
|
|
|
163,266
|
|
|
|
120,801
|
|
|
|
155,652
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues
|
|
|
143,969
|
|
|
|
|
17,665
|
|
|
|
161,634
|
|
|
|
205,469
|
|
|
|
248,168
|
|
|
|
280,006
|
|
|
|
270,915
|
|
|
|
199,870
|
|
|
|
242,795
|
|
Cost of revenues:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Software licenses
|
|
|
2,963
|
|
|
|
|
856
|
|
|
|
3,819
|
|
|
|
9,216
|
|
|
|
9,616
|
|
|
|
9,198
|
|
|
|
8,499
|
|
|
|
6,304
|
|
|
|
5,754
|
|
Maintenance
|
|
|
10,393
|
|
|
|
|
1,499
|
|
|
|
11,892
|
|
|
|
20,415
|
|
|
|
26,038
|
|
|
|
26,854
|
|
|
|
27,559
|
|
|
|
20,352
|
|
|
|
24,305
|
|
Professional services
|
|
|
7,849
|
|
|
|
|
861
|
|
|
|
8,710
|
|
|
|
12,575
|
|
|
|
14,277
|
|
|
|
16,118
|
|
|
|
14,154
|
|
|
|
10,659
|
|
|
|
10,243
|
|
Software-enabled services
|
|
|
37,799
|
|
|
|
|
4,411
|
|
|
|
42,210
|
|
|
|
57,810
|
|
|
|
78,951
|
|
|
|
90,263
|
|
|
|
87,528
|
|
|
|
65,079
|
|
|
|
82,137
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total cost of revenues
|
|
|
59,004
|
|
|
|
|
7,627
|
|
|
|
66,631
|
|
|
|
100,016
|
|
|
|
128,882
|
|
|
|
142,433
|
|
|
|
137,740
|
|
|
|
102,394
|
|
|
|
122,439
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
84,965
|
|
|
|
|
10,038
|
|
|
|
95,003
|
|
|
|
105,453
|
|
|
|
119,286
|
|
|
|
137,573
|
|
|
|
133,175
|
|
|
|
97,476
|
|
|
|
120,356
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling and marketing
|
|
|
13,134
|
|
|
|
|
1,364
|
|
|
|
14,498
|
|
|
|
17,598
|
|
|
|
19,701
|
|
|
|
19,566
|
|
|
|
20,362
|
|
|
|
15,229
|
|
|
|
18,910
|
|
Research and development
|
|
|
19,199
|
|
|
|
|
2,071
|
|
|
|
21,270
|
|
|
|
23,620
|
|
|
|
26,282
|
|
|
|
26,804
|
|
|
|
26,513
|
|
|
|
19,593
|
|
|
|
23,486
|
|
General and administrative
|
|
|
11,944
|
|
|
|
|
1,140
|
|
|
|
13,084
|
|
|
|
20,366
|
|
|
|
24,573
|
|
|
|
26,120
|
|
|
|
19,197
|
|
|
|
14,683
|
|
|
|
19,165
|
|
Merger costs
|
|
|
36,912
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
36,912
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses
|
|
|
81,189
|
|
|
|
|
4,575
|
|
|
|
85,764
|
|
|
|
61,584
|
|
|
|
70,556
|
|
|
|
72,490
|
|
|
|
66,072
|
|
|
|
49,505
|
|
|
|
61,561
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income
|
|
|
3,776
|
|
|
|
|
5,463
|
|
|
|
9,239
|
|
|
|
43,869
|
|
|
|
48,730
|
|
|
|
65,083
|
|
|
|
67,103
|
|
|
|
47,971
|
|
|
|
58,795
|
|
Interest income
|
|
|
1,031
|
|
|
|
|
30
|
|
|
|
1,061
|
|
|
|
388
|
|
|
|
939
|
|
|
|
409
|
|
|
|
28
|
|
|
|
24
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
(2,092
|
)
|
|
|
|
(4,920
|
)
|
|
|
(7,012
|
)
|
|
|
(47,427
|
)
|
|
|
(45,463
|
)
|
|
|
(41,539
|
)
|
|
|
(36,891
|
)
|
|
|
(27,815
|
)
|
|
|
(23,827
|
)
|
Other (expense) income, net
|
|
|
655
|
|
|
|
|
258
|
|
|
|
913
|
|
|
|
456
|
|
|
|
1,911
|
|
|
|
1,994
|
|
|
|
(1,418
|
)
|
|
|
(1,256
|
)
|
|
|
653
|
|
Loss on extinguishment of debt
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5,480
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before income taxes
|
|
|
3,370
|
|
|
|
|
831
|
|
|
|
4,201
|
|
|
|
(2,714
|
)
|
|
|
6,117
|
|
|
|
25,947
|
|
|
|
28,822
|
|
|
|
18,924
|
|
|
|
30,150
|
|
(Benefit) provision for income taxes
|
|
|
2,658
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,658
|
|
|
|
(3,789
|
)
|
|
|
(458
|
)
|
|
|
7,146
|
|
|
|
9,804
|
|
|
|
5,928
|
|
|
|
6,913
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
712
|
|
|
|
$
|
831
|
|
|
$
|
1,543
|
|
|
$
|
1,075
|
|
|
$
|
6,575
|
|
|
$
|
18,801
|
|
|
$
|
19,018
|
|
|
$
|
12,996
|
|
|
$
|
23,237
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings per
share1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$
|
0.03
|
|
|
|
$
|
0.01
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
0.02
|
|
|
$
|
0.11
|
|
|
$
|
0.31
|
|
|
$
|
0.31
|
|
|
$
|
0.22
|
|
|
$
|
0.34
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted
|
|
$
|
0.03
|
|
|
|
$
|
0.01
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
0.02
|
|
|
$
|
0.10
|
|
|
$
|
0.30
|
|
|
$
|
0.30
|
|
|
$
|
0.21
|
|
|
$
|
0.32
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average shares
outstanding1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
23,300
|
|
|
|
|
60,138
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
60,172
|
|
|
|
60,245
|
|
|
|
60,284
|
|
|
|
60,381
|
|
|
|
60,378
|
|
|
|
67,919
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
24,478
|
|
|
|
|
62,167
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
62,182
|
|
|
|
63,382
|
|
|
|
63,700
|
|
|
|
63,653
|
|
|
|
63,132
|
|
|
|
71,499
|
|
Pro forma earnings per
share2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
0.38
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
0.36
|
|
Pro forma weighted average shares
outstanding2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
70,399
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
73,819
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Statement of cash flows data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating activities
|
|
$
|
32,116
|
|
|
|
$
|
4,915
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
30,709
|
|
|
$
|
57,057
|
|
|
$
|
61,655
|
|
|
$
|
59,852
|
|
|
$
|
45,000
|
|
|
$
|
47,629
|
|
Investing activities
|
|
|
(110,495
|
)
|
|
|
|
(877,261
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(18,626
|
)
|
|
|
(12,839
|
)
|
|
|
(24,608
|
)
|
|
|
(54,134
|
)
|
|
|
(11,562
|
)
|
|
|
(14,757
|
)
|
Financing activities
|
|
|
69,161
|
|
|
|
|
868,655
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(16,427
|
)
|
|
|
(37,408
|
)
|
|
|
(25,532
|
)
|
|
|
(17,896
|
)
|
|
|
(11,960
|
)
|
|
|
35,107
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other financial data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recurring revenue
percentage3
|
|
|
77.3%
|
|
|
|
|
65.4%
|
|
|
|
76.0%
|
|
|
|
79.3%
|
|
|
|
81.9%
|
|
|
|
82.4%
|
|
|
|
84.7%
|
|
|
|
84.7%
|
|
|
|
86.4%
|
|
Consolidated
EBITDA4
|
|
$
|
64,989
|
|
|
|
$
|
8,588
|
|
|
$
|
73,577
|
|
|
$
|
83,998
|
|
|
$
|
98,667
|
|
|
$
|
115,566
|
|
|
$
|
119,266
|
|
|
$
|
82,979
|
|
|
$
|
99,579
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance sheet data (at period end):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash, cash equivalents and marketable securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
15,584
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
11,718
|
|
|
$
|
19,175
|
|
|
$
|
29,299
|
|
|
$
|
19,055
|
|
|
$
|
52,461
|
|
|
$
|
86,975
|
|
Working capital (deficit)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,283
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,312
|
)
|
|
|
5,668
|
|
|
|
10,835
|
|
|
|
(14,610
|
)
|
|
$
|
21,020
|
|
|
$
|
71,064
|
|
Total assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,176,371
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,152,521
|
|
|
|
1,190,495
|
|
|
|
1,127,353
|
|
|
|
1,185,641
|
|
|
$
|
1,165,854
|
|
|
$
|
1,245,639
|
|
Long-term debt, net of current portion
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
478,143
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
466,235
|
|
|
|
440,580
|
|
|
|
406,625
|
|
|
|
392,989
|
|
|
$
|
400,300
|
|
|
$
|
288,685
|
|
Total stockholders equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
557,133
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
563,132
|
|
|
|
612,593
|
|
|
|
587,253
|
|
|
|
645,987
|
|
|
$
|
634,818
|
|
|
$
|
828,489
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
Amounts for the Predecessor periods
are computed based upon the capital structure in existence prior
to the Acquisition. Amounts for the Successor periods are
computed based upon the capital structure in existence
subsequent to the Acquisition.
|
|
(2)
|
|
Pro forma basic and diluted
earnings per share for the nine months ended September 30,
2010 give effect to the issuance and sale by us of
2,000,000 shares in this offering, the net proceeds of
which, along with $35.1 million of our existing cash
resources, will be used to redeem $66.6 million in
principal amount of the notes, for $68.6 million in cash
and excludes the loss on extinguishment of debt associated with
the redemption. As a result of this redemption, our aggregate
interest expense for the period in respect of the notes, net of
tax, will decrease by approximately $3.7 million. See
Use of proceeds.
|
|
(3)
|
|
Recurring revenue percentage
represents software-enabled services revenues and maintenance
revenues as a percentage of total revenues. We do not believe
that the recurring revenue percentage for the Successor period
of 2005 is meaningful because such period is only five weeks in
duration and not indicative of our overall trends.
|
39
|
|
|
(4)
|
|
Consolidated EBITDA is a non-GAAP
financial measure used in key financial covenants contained in
our senior credit facilities, which are material facilities
supporting our capital structure and providing liquidity to our
business. Consolidated EBITDA is defined as earnings before
interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization (EBITDA), further
adjusted to exclude unusual items and other adjustments
permitted in calculating covenant compliance under our senior
credit facilities. We believe that the inclusion of
supplementary adjustments to EBITDA applied in presenting
Consolidated EBITDA is appropriate to provide additional
information to investors to demonstrate compliance with the
specified financial ratios and other financial condition tests
contained in our senior credit facilities.
|
|
|
|
Management uses Consolidated EBITDA
to gauge the costs of our capital structure on a day-to-day
basis when full financial statements are unavailable. Management
further believes that providing this information allows our
investors greater transparency and a better understanding of our
ability to meet our debt service obligations and make capital
expenditures.
|
|
|
|
Any breach of covenants in our
senior credit facilities that are tied to ratios based on
Consolidated EBITDA could result in a default under that
agreement, in which case the lenders could elect to declare all
amounts borrowed due and payable and to terminate any
commitments they have to provide further borrowings. Any such
acceleration would also result in a default under our indenture.
Any default and subsequent acceleration of payments under our
debt agreements would have a material adverse effect on our
results of operations, financial position and cash flows.
Additionally, under our debt agreements, our ability to engage
in activities such as incurring additional indebtedness, making
investments and paying dividends is also tied to ratios based on
Consolidated EBITDA.
|
|
|
|
Consolidated EBITDA does not
represent net income or cash flow from operations as those terms
are defined by GAAP and does not necessarily indicate whether
cash flows will be sufficient to fund cash needs. Further, our
senior credit facilities require that Consolidated EBITDA be
calculated for the most recent four fiscal quarters. As a
result, the measure can be disproportionately affected by a
particularly strong or weak quarter. Further, it may not be
comparable to the measure for any subsequent four-quarter period
or any complete fiscal year.
|
|
|
|
Consolidated EBITDA is not a
recognized measurement under GAAP, and investors should not
consider Consolidated EBITDA as a substitute for measures of our
financial performance and liquidity as determined in accordance
with GAAP, such as net income, operating income or net cash
provided by operating activities. Because other companies may
calculate Consolidated EBITDA differently than we do,
Consolidated EBITDA may not be comparable to similarly titled
measures reported by other companies. Consolidated EBITDA has
other limitations as an analytical tool, when compared to the
use of net income, which is the most directly comparable GAAP
financial measure, including:
|
|
|
|
Consolidated EBITDA
does not reflect the provision of income tax expense in our
various jurisdictions;
|
|
|
|
Consolidated EBITDA
does not reflect the significant interest expense we incur as a
result of our debt leverage;
|
|
|
|
Consolidated EBITDA
does not reflect any attribution of costs to our operations
related to our investments and capital expenditures through
depreciation and amortization charges;
|
|
|
|
Consolidated EBITDA
does not reflect the cost of compensation we provide to our
employees in the form of stock option awards; and
|
|
|
|
Consolidated EBITDA
excludes expenses that we believe are unusual or non-recurring,
but which others may believe are normal expenses for the
operation of a business.
|
|
|
|
The following is a reconciliation
of net income to Consolidated EBITDA as defined in our senior
credit facilities.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
Combined
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Period
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Period
|
|
|
|
from
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
from
|
|
|
|
November 23,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Twelve
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
January 1
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
Year
|
|
|
Year
|
|
|
Year
|
|
|
Year
|
|
|
Year
|
|
|
Months
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
through
|
|
|
|
through
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
November 22,
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010a
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(unaudited)
|
|
|
(unaudited)
|
|
|
(unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
712
|
|
|
|
$
|
831
|
|
|
$
|
1,543
|
|
|
$
|
1,075
|
|
|
$
|
6,575
|
|
|
$
|
18,801
|
|
|
$
|
19,018
|
|
|
$
|
29,259
|
|
|
$
|
12,996
|
|
|
$
|
23,237
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense,
netb
|
|
|
1,061
|
|
|
|
|
4,890
|
|
|
|
5,951
|
|
|
|
47,039
|
|
|
|
44,524
|
|
|
|
41,130
|
|
|
|
36,863
|
|
|
|
38,370
|
|
|
|
27,791
|
|
|
|
29,298
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income taxes
|
|
|
2,658
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,658
|
|
|
|
(3,789
|
)
|
|
|
(458
|
)
|
|
|
7,146
|
|
|
|
9,804
|
|
|
|
10,789
|
|
|
|
5,928
|
|
|
|
6,913
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
9,575
|
|
|
|
|
2,301
|
|
|
|
11,876
|
|
|
|
27,128
|
|
|
|
35,047
|
|
|
|
35,038
|
|
|
|
36,028
|
|
|
|
39,677
|
|
|
|
26,707
|
|
|
|
30,356
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EBITDA
|
|
|
14,006
|
|
|
|
|
8,022
|
|
|
|
22,028
|
|
|
|
71,453
|
|
|
|
85,668
|
|
|
|
102,115
|
|
|
|
101,713
|
|
|
|
118,095
|
|
|
|
73,422
|
|
|
|
89,804
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase accounting
adjustmentsc
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
616
|
|
|
|
616
|
|
|
|
3,017
|
|
|
|
(296
|
)
|
|
|
(289
|
)
|
|
|
(93
|
)
|
|
|
(54
|
)
|
|
|
(163
|
)
|
|
|
(124
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Merger costs
|
|
|
36,912
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
36,912
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital-based taxes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,841
|
|
|
|
1,721
|
|
|
|
1,212
|
|
|
|
795
|
|
|
|
984
|
|
|
|
672
|
|
|
|
861
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unusual or non-recurring charges
(income)d
|
|
|
(737
|
)
|
|
|
|
(242
|
)
|
|
|
(979
|
)
|
|
|
1,485
|
|
|
|
(1,718
|
)
|
|
|
1,480
|
|
|
|
1,990
|
|
|
|
(142
|
)
|
|
|
1,683
|
|
|
|
(449
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Acquired EBITDA and cost
savingse
|
|
|
14,808
|
|
|
|
|
85
|
|
|
|
14,893
|
|
|
|
1,147
|
|
|
|
135
|
|
|
|
2,379
|
|
|
|
8,053
|
|
|
|
2,121
|
|
|
|
2,025
|
|
|
|
192
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock-based compensation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,871
|
|
|
|
10,979
|
|
|
|
7,323
|
|
|
|
5,607
|
|
|
|
10,425
|
|
|
|
4,363
|
|
|
|
9,181
|
|
|
|
|
|
Otherf
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
107
|
|
|
|
107
|
|
|
|
1,184
|
|
|
|
2,158
|
|
|
|
1,346
|
|
|
|
1,201
|
|
|
|
338
|
|
|
|
977
|
|
|
|
114
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated EBITDA
|
|
$
|
64,989
|
|
|
|
$
|
8,588
|
|
|
$
|
73,577
|
|
|
$
|
83,998
|
|
|
$
|
98,667
|
|
|
$
|
115,566
|
|
|
$
|
119,266
|
|
|
$
|
131,767
|
|
|
$
|
82,979
|
|
|
$
|
99,579
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a)
|
|
Results for the twelve months ended
September 30, 2010 are included because our senior credit
facilities require the calculation of our consolidated total
leverage and consolidated net interest coverage ratio for the
prior four consecutive quarters. With the exception of acquired
EBITDA and cost savings, our results for the twelve months ended
|
40
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2010 are
calculated based on our results for the year ended
December 31, 2009, in addition to our results for the nine
months ended September 30, 2010, less our results for the
nine months ended September 30, 2009.
|
|
(b)
|
|
Interest expense includes any loss
on extinguishment of debt shown as a separate line item on the
statement of operations.
|
|
(c)
|
|
Purchase accounting adjustments
include (1) an adjustment to increase revenues by the
amount that would have been recognized if deferred revenue were
not adjusted to fair value at the date of the Transaction and
(2) an adjustment to increase rent expense by the amount
that would have been recognized if lease obligations were not
adjusted to fair value at the date of the Transaction.
|
|
(d)
|
|
Unusual or non-recurring charges
include foreign currency transaction gains and losses, expenses
related to our prior proposed public offering, severance
expenses associated with workforce reduction, gains and losses
on the sales of marketable securities, equity earnings and
losses on investments, proceeds and payments associated with
legal and other settlements, costs associated with the closing
of a regional office and other one-time gains and expenses.
|
|
(e)
|
|
Acquired EBITDA and cost savings
reflects the EBITDA impact of significant businesses that were
acquired during the period as if the acquisition occurred at the
beginning of the period and cost savings to be realized from
such acquisitions.
|
|
(f)
|
|
Other includes management fees and
related expenses paid to Carlyle and the non-cash portion of
straight-line rent expense.
|
41
Consolidated
EBITDA and consolidated leverage ratios
Our senior credit facilities require us to maintain both a
maximum consolidated total leverage to Consolidated EBITDA ratio
(currently no more than 5.50) and a minimum Consolidated EBITDA
to consolidated net interest ratio (currently not less than
2.25) in each case calculated for the trailing four quarters.
The table below summarizes our Consolidated EBITDA, consolidated
total leverage ratio and consolidated net interest coverage
ratio for the periods presented.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Successor
|
|
|
|
Combined1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Twelve Months
|
|
|
Twelve Months
|
|
|
|
Twelve Months
|
|
|
Twelve Months
|
|
|
Twelve Months
|
|
|
Twelve Months
|
|
|
Twelve Months
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2010
|
|
(In thousands, except ratio data)
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
(Actual)
|
|
|
(As
adjusted)6
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated
EBITDA2
|
|
$
|
73,577
|
|
|
$
|
83,998
|
|
|
$
|
98,667
|
|
|
$
|
115,566
|
|
|
$
|
119,266
|
|
|
$
|
131,767
|
|
|
$
|
131,767
|
|
Consolidated total leverage to Consolidated EBITDA ratio
(current maximum covenant level:
5.50)3
|
|
|
6.43
|
|
|
|
5.48
|
|
|
|
4.30
|
|
|
|
3.28
|
|
|
|
3.17
|
|
|
|
1.98
|
|
|
|
1.47
|
|
Consolidated EBITDA to consolidated net interest coverage ratio
(current minimum covenant level:
2.25)4
|
|
|
10.87
|
5
|
|
|
1.88
|
|
|
|
2.34
|
|
|
|
2.98
|
|
|
|
3.45
|
|
|
|
4.30
|
|
|
|
5.77
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
Our combined results for the year
ended December 31, 2005 represent the addition of the
Predecessor period from January 1, 2005 through
November 22, 2005 and the Successor period from
November 23, 2005 through December 31, 2005. This
combination does not comply with GAAP or with the rules for pro
forma presentation, but is presented because we believe it
provides the most meaningful comparison of our results.
|
|
|
|
(2)
|
|
We reconcile our Consolidated
EBITDA for the trailing four quarters to net income for the same
period using the same methods set forth above.
|
|
(3)
|
|
Consolidated total leverage ratio
is defined in our senior credit facilities at the last day of
any period of four consecutive fiscal quarters, as the ratio of
(a) the principal amount of all debt at such date, minus
the amount, up to a maximum amount of $30.0 million of cash
and cash equivalents to (b) Consolidated EBITDA. The
current maximum consolidated total leverage ratio is 5.50. The
maximum consolidated total leverage ratio for 2010 and 2009 was
5.50, for 2008 was 6.00, for 2007 was 6.75 and for 2006 was
7.50. There was no maximum consolidated total leverage ratio
covenant prior to June 30, 2006.
|
|
(4)
|
|
Consolidated net interest coverage
ratio is defined in our senior credit facilities as for any
period, the ratio of (a) Consolidated EBITDA for such
period to (b) total cash interest expense for such period
with respect to all outstanding indebtedness minus total cash
interest income for such period. The current minimum
consolidated net interest coverage ratio is 2.25. The minimum
consolidated net interest coverage ratio for 2010 and 2009 was
2.00, for 2008 was 1.70, for 2007 was 1.50 and for 2006 was
1.40. There was no minimum consolidated net interest coverage
ratio covenant prior to June 30, 2006.
|
|
(5)
|
|
This ratio is not comparable
because we did not incur debt under our existing senior credit
facilities until November 2005 in connection with the
Transaction.
|
|
(6)
|
|
As adjusted to give effect to the
receipt by us of approximately $33.5 million in net
proceeds from the sale of 2,000,000 shares of our common
stock in this offering at the public offering price of $17.60
per share, after deducting underwriting discounts and
commissions and estimated offering expenses payable by us, and
the use of such net proceeds and $35.1 million of our
existing cash resources to redeem $66.6 million in original
principal amount of our outstanding
113/4% senior
subordinated notes at a redemption price of 102.9375% of the
principal amount, plus accrued and unpaid interest. The as
adjusted data also give effect to our receipt of the aggregate
exercise price for the 480,100 shares of common stock to be
acquired by certain of the selling stockholders upon exercise of
options in connection with this offering.
|
42
Managements
discussion and analysis of
financial condition and results of operations
You should read the following discussion and analysis of our
financial condition and results of operations in conjunction
with the Selected historical financial data section
of this prospectus and our consolidated financial statements and
the accompanying notes appearing elsewhere in this prospectus.
In addition to historical information, this discussion contains
forward-looking statements based on our current expectations
that involve risks, uncertainties and assumptions. Our actual
results may differ materially from those anticipated in these
forward-looking statements as a result of various factors,
including those set forth in the Risk factors
section and elsewhere in this prospectus.
Overview
We are a leading provider of mission-critical, sophisticated
software products and software-enabled services that allow
financial services providers to automate complex business
processes and effectively manage their information processing
requirements. Our portfolio of software products and rapidly
deployable software-enabled services allows our clients to
automate and integrate front-office functions such as trading
and modeling, middle-office functions such as portfolio
management and reporting, and back-office functions such as
accounting, performance measurement, reconciliation, reporting,
processing and clearing. Our solutions enable our clients to
focus on core operations, better monitor and manage investment
performance and risk, improve operating efficiency and reduce
operating costs. We provide our solutions globally to more than
4,500 clients, principally within the institutional asset
management, alternative investment management and financial
institutions vertical markets. In addition, our clients include
commercial lenders, corporate treasury groups, insurance and
pension funds, municipal finance groups and real estate property
managers.
Since 2007, we have expanded our presence in current markets and
entered new markets, increased our contractually recurring
revenues, enhanced our operating income, paid down debt and
reduced our debt leverage, increased our revenues through
offering our proprietary software as software-enabled services,
and expanded our reach in the financial services market. Our
acquisitions since 2007 have expanded our offerings for
alternative investment managers, added to our portfolio
management systems and provided us with new trading products for
broker/dealers and financial exchanges.
Our revenues for 2009 were $270.9 million, compared to
$280.0 million and $248.2 million in 2008 and 2007,
respectively. Our revenues decreased in 2009 due in part to the
impact of the recent economic downturn and of a strengthened
U.S. dollar, offset in part by revenues attributable to acquired
businesses. Our revenues increased from $199.9 million in
the nine months ended September 30, 2009 to
$242.8 million in the nine months ended September 30,
2010, primarily as a result of revenues from products and
services that we acquired through our acquisitions of Evare,
LLC, or Evare, in March 2009, Unisys Corporations MAXIMIS
software, or MAXIMIS, in May 2009, TheNextRound, Inc., or TNR,
in November 2009, Tradeware Global Corp., or Tradeware, in
December 2009, and the Geller Investment Partnership Services
division, or GIPS, of Geller & Company LLC in February
2010, which, in the aggregate, added $26.9 million in
revenues in the nine months ended September 30, 2010.
Organic revenues increased $11.5 million, and the favorable
impact from foreign currency translation accounted for
$4.5 million of the total increase, resulting from the
weakness of the U.S. dollar relative to
43
currencies such as the Canadian dollar and the Australian
dollar. Our recurring revenues, which consist of our maintenance
revenues and software-enabled services revenues, were
$229.4 million in 2009, compared to $230.8 million and
$203.2 million in 2008 and 2007, respectively. In 2009,
recurring revenues represented 84.7% of total revenues, compared
to 82.4% and 81.9% in 2008 and 2007, respectively. Our recurring
revenues increased from $169.4 million in the nine months
ended September 30, 2009, or 84.7% of total revenues, to
$209.8 million in the nine months ended September 30,
2010, or 86.4% of total revenues. We believe our high level of
recurring revenues provides us with the ability to better manage
our costs and capital investments. Our revenues from sales
outside the United States were $98.6 million in 2009,
compared to $110.3 million and $101.1 million in 2008
and 2007, respectively, and increased from $72.7 million in
the nine months ended September 30, 2009 to
$78.0 million in the nine months ended September 30,
2010.
As we have expanded our business, we have focused on increasing
our contractually recurring revenues. Since 2007, we have seen
increased demand in the financial services industry for our
software-enabled services from existing and new customers. To
support that demand, we have taken a number of steps, such as
automating our software-enabled services delivery methods and
providing our employees with sales incentives. We have also
acquired businesses that offer software-enabled services or that
have a large base of maintenance clients. We believe that
increasing the portion of our total revenues that are
contractually recurring gives us the ability to better plan and
manage our business and helps us reduce the fluctuations in
revenues and cash flows typically associated with software
license revenues. Our software-enabled services revenues
increased from $141.3 million in 2007 to
$163.3 million in 2009. Our software-enabled services
revenues increased from $120.8 million in the nine months
ended September 30, 2009 to $155.7 million in the nine
months ended September 30, 2010, primarily as a result of
revenues from acquisitions, which contributed
$18.8 million, an increase of $12.3 million in organic
software-enabled services revenues and the favorable impact from
foreign currency translation of $3.8 million. Our
maintenance revenues increased from $61.9 million in 2007
to $66.1 million in 2009 and from $48.6 million in the
nine months ended September 30, 2009 to $54.1 million
in the nine months ended September 30, 2010. Maintenance
customer retention rates have continued to be in excess of 90%
and we have maintained both pricing levels for new contracts and
annual price increases for existing contracts. To support the
growth in our software-enabled services revenues and maintain
our level of customer service, we have invested in increased
personnel, facilities expansion and information technology.
These investments and automation improvements in our
software-enabled services have resulted in improved gross
margins. Gross margins have increased from 48.1% in 2007 to
49.2% in 2009 and increased from 48.8% in the nine months ended
September 30, 2009 to 49.6% in the nine months ended
September 30, 2010. We expect our contractually recurring
revenues to continue to increase as a percentage of our total
revenues.
We continue to focus on improving operating margins. Our total
expenses, including costs of revenues, were $203.8 million
in 2009, compared to $214.9 million and $199.4 million
in 2008 and 2007, respectively. Our expenses decreased in 2009
over 2008 mainly as a result of our workforce reduction in
November 2008 in an effort to reduce costs in response to the
then anticipated effects of the recent economic downturn. Our
expenses increased from $151.9 million in the nine months
ended September 30, 2009 to $184.0 million in the nine
months ended September 30, 2010, primarily due to
acquisitions, which added costs of revenues and operating
expenses of $18.8 million, an increase in stock-based
compensation of $4.9 million, an increase in costs of
$3.1 million related to foreign currency translation, an
increase of $3.0 million in amortization expense, and an
increase of $2.3 million in costs to
44
support organic revenue growth. As a result of managing our
expenses, our operating income margins were 24.8% of revenues in
2009 compared to 23.2% in 2008 and 19.6% in 2007 and increased
from 24.0% of revenues in the nine months ended
September 30, 2009 to 24.2% of revenues in the nine months
ended September 30, 2010. Consolidated EBITDA, a non-GAAP
financial measure defined in our credit agreement and used to
measure our debt compliance, was $119.3 million in 2009
compared to $115.6 million and $98.7 million, in 2008
and 2007, respectively, and increased from $83.0 million in
the nine months ended September 30, 2009 to
$99.6 million in the nine months ended September 30,
2010. Please see Selected historical financial data
for a reconciliation of net income to Consolidated EBITDA.
We generated $59.9 million in cash from operating
activities in 2009, compared to $61.7 million and
$57.1 million in 2008 and 2007, respectively. In 2009, we
used our operating cash flow and existing cash to repay
$19.7 million of debt, acquire four businesses for
$51.5 million and invest $2.6 million in capital
equipment in our business. Cash from operating activities
increased from $45.0 million in the nine months ended
September 30, 2009 to $47.6 million in the nine months
ended September 30, 2010. In the nine months ended
September 30, 2010, we used our operating cash flow and
existing cash to repay $107.7 million of debt, acquire one
business for $11.4 million, invest $3.3 million in
capital equipment in our business and invest $0.2 million
in capitalized software.
Acquisitions
To supplement our organic growth, we evaluate and execute
acquisitions that provide complementary products or services,
add proven technology and an established client base, expand our
intellectual property portfolio or address a highly specialized
problem or a market niche. Since the beginning of 2007, we have
spent approximately $124.4 million in cash to acquire nine
businesses in the financial services industry.
45
The following table lists the businesses we have acquired since
January 1, 2007:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acquired business
|
|
Acquisition date
|
|
Acquired capabilities, products
and services
|
|
|
TimeShareWare
|
|
December 2010
|
|
Added shared ownership property management platform to real
estate offering
|
thinkorswim Technologies
|
|
October 2010
|
|
Added electronic OMS/EMS offering in broker/dealer market
|
GIPS
|
|
February 2010
|
|
Expanded fund administration services to private equity market
|
Tradeware
|
|
December 2009
|
|
Added electronic trading offering in broker/ dealer market
|
TheNextRound
|
|
November 2009
|
|
Expanded private equity client base with TNR Solution product
|
MAXIMIS
|
|
May 2009
|
|
Expanded institutional footprint and provided new cross-selling
opportunities
|
Evare
|
|
March 2009
|
|
Expanded institutional middle- and back-office outsourcing
services with financial data acquisition, transformation and
delivery services
|
Micro Design Services
|
|
October 2008
|
|
Added real-time, mission-critical order routing and execution
services with ACA and MarketLook products
|
Northport
|
|
March 2007
|
|
Expanded fund administration services to private equity market
|
|
|
Critical
accounting estimates and assumptions
A number of our accounting policies require the application of
significant judgment by our management, and such judgments are
reflected in the amounts reported in our consolidated financial
statements. In applying these policies, our management uses its
judgment to determine the appropriate assumptions to be used in
the determination of estimates. Those estimates are based on our
historical experience, terms of existing contracts,
managements observation of trends in the industry,
information provided by our clients and information available
from other outside sources, as appropriate. On an ongoing basis,
we evaluate our estimates and judgments, including those related
to revenue recognition, doubtful accounts receivable, goodwill
and other intangible assets and other contingent liabilities.
Actual results may differ significantly from the estimates
contained in our consolidated financial statements. We believe
that the following are our critical accounting policies.
Revenue
recognition
Our revenues consist primarily of software-enabled services and
maintenance revenues, and, to a lesser degree, software license
and professional services revenues.
Software-enabled services revenues, which are based on a monthly
fee or transaction-based, are recognized as the services are
performed. Software-enabled services are generally provided
under non-cancelable contracts with initial terms of one to five
years that require monthly or
46
quarterly payments and are subject to automatic annual renewal
at the end of the initial term unless terminated by either party.
We recognize software-enabled services revenues on a monthly
basis as the software-enabled services are provided and when
persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, the price is fixed
or determinable and collectibility is reasonably assured. We do
not recognize any revenues before services are performed.
Certain contracts contain additional fees for increases in
market value, pricing and trading activity. Revenues related to
these additional fees are recognized in the month in which the
activity occurs based upon our summarization of account
information and trading volume.
We recognize revenues from the sale of software licenses when
persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, the product has
been delivered, the fee is fixed or determinable and collection
of the resulting receivable is reasonably assured. Our products
generally do not require significant modification or
customization of the underlying software and, accordingly, the
implementation services we provide are not considered essential
to the functionality of the software.
We use a signed license agreement as evidence of an arrangement
for the majority of our transactions. Delivery generally occurs
when the product is delivered to a common carrier F.O.B.
shipping point, or if delivered electronically, when the client
has been provided with access codes that allow for immediate
possession via a download. Although our arrangements generally
do not have acceptance provisions, if such provisions are
included in the arrangement, then delivery occurs at acceptance,
unless such acceptance is deemed perfunctory. At the time of the
transaction, we assess whether the fee is fixed or determinable
based on the payment terms. Collection is assessed based on
several factors, including past transaction history with the
client and the creditworthiness of the client. The arrangements
for perpetual software licenses are generally sold with
maintenance and professional services. We allocate revenue to
the delivered components, normally the license component, using
the residual value method based on objective evidence of the
fair value of the undelivered elements. The total contract value
is attributed first to the maintenance and customer support
arrangement based on the fair value, which is derived from
renewal rates. Fair value of the professional services is based
upon stand-alone sales of those services. Professional services
are generally billed at an hourly rate plus
out-of-pocket
expenses. Professional services revenues are recognized as the
services are performed. Maintenance agreements generally require
us to provide technical support and software updates to our
clients (on a
when-and-if-available
basis). We generally provide maintenance services under one-year
renewable contracts. Maintenance revenues are recognized ratably
over the term of the contract.
We also sell term licenses with maintenance. These arrangements
range from one to seven years. Vendor-specific objective
evidence does not exist for the maintenance element in the term
licenses, and revenues are therefore recognized ratably over the
contractual term of the arrangement.
We occasionally enter into software license agreements requiring
significant customization or fixed-fee professional service
arrangements. We account for these arrangements in accordance
with the
percentage-of-completion
method based on the ratio of hours incurred to expected total
hours; accordingly we must estimate the costs to complete the
arrangement utilizing an estimate of
man-hours
remaining. Due to uncertainties inherent in the estimation
process, it is at least reasonably possible that completion
costs may be revised. Such revisions are recognized in the
period in which the revisions are determined. Due to the
complexity of some software license agreements, we routinely
apply judgments to the application of software revenue
recognition accounting principles to specific agreements and
transactions. Different judgments
47
or different contract structures could have led to different
accounting conclusions, which could have a material effect on
our reported results of operations.
Allowance for
doubtful accounts
The preparation of financial statements requires our management
to make estimates relating to the collectibility of our accounts
receivable. Management establishes the allowance for doubtful
accounts based on historical bad debt experience. In addition,
management analyzes client accounts, client concentrations,
client creditworthiness, current economic trends and changes in
our clients payment terms when evaluating the adequacy of
the allowance for doubtful accounts. Such estimates require
significant judgment on the part of our management. Therefore,
changes in the assumptions underlying our estimates or changes
in the financial condition of our clients could result in a
different required allowance, which could have a material effect
on our reported results of operations.
Long-lived
assets, intangible assets and goodwill
We must test goodwill annually for impairment (and in interim
periods if certain events occur indicating that the carrying
value of goodwill or indefinite-lived intangible assets may be
impaired). Historically, we have tested the recoverability of
goodwill by comparing the fair value or our reporting unit to
its book value. To the extent that we do not achieve our revenue
or operating cash flow plans or other measures of fair value
decline, including external valuation assumptions, our current
goodwill carrying value could be impaired. Additionally, since
fair value is also based in part on the market approach, if our
stock price declines it is possible we could be required to
perform the second step of the goodwill impairment test and
impairment could result. The first step of the impairment
analysis indicated that the fair value of our reporting unit
exceeded its carrying value by more than 25% at
December 31, 2009.
We assess the impairment of identifiable intangibles, long-lived
assets and goodwill whenever events or changes in circumstances
indicate that the carrying value may not be recoverable. Factors
we consider important which could trigger an impairment review
include the following:
|
|
|
significant underperformance relative to historical or projected
future operating results;
|
|
|
significant changes in the manner of our use of the acquired
assets or the strategy for our overall business; and
|
|
|
significant negative industry or economic trends.
|
When we determine that the carrying value of intangibles and
long-lived assets may not be recoverable based upon the
existence of one or more of the above indicators of potential
impairment, we assess whether an impairment has occurred based
on whether net book value of the assets exceeds related
projected undiscounted cash flows from these assets. We consider
a number of factors, including past operating results, budgets,
economic projections, market trends and product development
cycles in estimating future cash flows. Differing estimates and
assumptions as to any of the factors described above could
result in a materially different impairment charge and thus
materially different results of operations.
48
Acquisition
accounting
In connection with our acquisitions, we allocate the purchase
price to the assets and liabilities we acquire, such as net
tangible assets, completed technology, in-process research and
development, client contracts, other identifiable intangible
assets, deferred revenue and goodwill. We applied significant
judgments and estimates in determining the fair market value of
the assets acquired and their useful lives. For example, we have
determined the fair value of existing client contracts based on
the discounted estimated net future cash flows from such client
contracts existing at the date of acquisition and the fair value
of the completed technology based on the relief-from-royalties
method on estimated future revenues of such completed
technology. While actual results during the years ended
December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007 and the nine months ended
September 30, 2010 were not materially different from our
estimated cash flows and we did not incur any impairment charges
during those years, different estimates and assumptions in
valuing acquired assets could yield materially different results.
Stock-based
compensation
Using the fair value recognition provisions of relevant
accounting literature, stock-based compensation cost is measured
at the grant date based on the value of the award and is
recognized as expense over the appropriate service period.
Determining the fair value of stock-based awards requires
considerable judgment, including estimating the fair value of
our common stock, the expected term of stock options, expected
volatility of our stock price, and the number of awards expected
to be forfeited. In addition, for stock-based awards where
vesting is dependent upon achieving certain operating
performance goals, we estimate the likelihood of achieving the
performance goals. Differences between actual results and these
estimates could have a material effect on our financial results.
A deferred income tax asset is recorded over the vesting period
as stock compensation expense is recorded. The realizability of
the deferred tax asset is ultimately based on the actual value
of the stock-based award upon exercise. If the actual value is
lower than the fair value determined on the date of grant, then
there could be an income tax expense for the portion of the
deferred tax asset that is not realizable.
To date, we have granted stock options to our employees and
directors under our 2006 equity incentive plan and 2008 stock
incentive plan. Because there was no public market for our
common stock prior to our IPO, our board of directors determined
the fair value of our common stock on the measurement date,
which required complex and subjective judgments. Our board
reviewed and considered a number of factors when determining the
fair value of our common stock, including:
|
|
|
the value of our business as determined at arms length in
connection with the Transaction;
|
|
|
significant business milestones that may have affected the value
of our business subsequent to the Transaction;
|
|
|
the risks associated with our business;
|
|
|
the economic outlook in general and the condition and outlook of
our industry;
|
|
|
our financial condition and expected operating results;
|
|
|
our level of outstanding indebtedness;
|
49
|
|
|
the market price of stocks of publicly traded corporations
engaged in the same or similar lines of business;
|
|
|
as of July 31, 2006, March 31, 2007 and March 1,
2008, analyses using a weighted average of three generally
accepted valuation procedures: the income approach, the market
approachpublicly traded guideline company method and the
market approachtransaction method; and
|
|
|
as of November 15, 2008, April 1, 2009 and
November 30, 2009, analyses using a weighted average of two
generally accepted valuation procedures: the income approach and
the market approach-publicly traded guideline company method.
The market approachtransaction method was not utilized due
to the lack of comparable transactions in the evaluation period.
|
The following table summarizes information about stock options
granted since August 2006, the date of the first option grants
since the Transaction:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
average
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-
|
|
|
fair value
|
|
|
Weighted-average grant date fair value of options by vesting
type1:
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
average
|
|
|
of
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
|
under
|
|
|
exercise
|
|
|
underlying
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
in
|
|
Grant date
|
|
option
|
|
|
price
|
|
|
stock
|
|
|
Time
|
|
|
Performance
|
|
|
control
|
|
|
|
|
August 2006
|
|
|
9,909,555
|
|
|
$
|
8.77
|
|
|
$
|
8.77
|
|
|
$
|
3.66
|
|
|
$
|
3.88
|
|
|
$
|
2.50
|
|
November 2006
|
|
|
89,250
|
|
|
|
8.77
|
|
|
|
8.77
|
|
|
|
3.62
|
|
|
|
3.84
|
|
|
|
2.50
|
|
March 2007
|
|
|
195,500
|
|
|
|
8.77
|
|
|
|
8.77
|
|
|
|
3.61
|
|
|
|
3.83
|
|
|
|
0.87
|
|
May 2007
|
|
|
148,750
|
|
|
|
11.64
|
|
|
|
11.64
|
|
|
|
4.81
|
|
|
|
5.10
|
|
|
|
1.07
|
|
June 2007
|
|
|
25,500
|
|
|
|
11.64
|
|
|
|
11.64
|
|
|
|
4.87
|
|
|
|
5.16
|
|
|
|
1.02
|
|
January 2009
|
|
|
255,041
|
|
|
|
10.08
|
|
|
|
10.08
|
|
|
|
2.86
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 2009
|
|
|
102,000
|
|
|
|
14.53
|
|
|
|
14.53
|
|
|
|
4.54
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
January 2010
|
|
|
4,250
|
|
|
|
14.53
|
|
|
|
14.53
|
|
|
|
4.49
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
February 2010
|
|
|
400,350
|
|
|
|
14.53
|
|
|
|
14.53
|
|
|
|
4.48
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 2010
|
|
|
1,615,085
|
|
|
|
14.53
|
|
|
|
14.53
|
|
|
|
4.51
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
April 2010
|
|
|
21,250
|
|
|
|
15.29
|
|
|
|
15.29
|
|
|
|
4.79
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
May 2010
|
|
|
50,200
|
|
|
|
16.49
|
|
|
|
16.49
|
|
|
|
5.64
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 2010
|
|
|
48,500
|
|
|
|
17.83
|
|
|
|
17.83
|
|
|
|
6.06
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
August 2010
|
|
|
14,500
|
|
|
|
16.24
|
|
|
|
16.24
|
|
|
|
5.42
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
The weighted-average fair value of
options by vesting type represents the value at the grant date.
These fair values do not reflect the re-valuation of certain
options related to modifications effected in February 2009,
March 2008 and April 2007, or the resolutions approved by our
board and compensation committee in February 2010 relating to
performance-based and superior options, as more fully described
in notes 10, 16 and 17 to the consolidated financial
statements included elsewhere in this prospectus.
|
Stock options
granted
Between the closing date of the Transaction in November 2005 and
early August 2006, we did not award any options or other equity
awards to our employees or directors. In August 2006, our board
of directors adopted, and our stockholders approved, our 2006
equity incentive plan. On August 9, 2006, our board of
directors granted options to purchase an aggregate of
9,909,555 shares of common stock at an exercise price of
$8.77 per share. Our board of directors
50
determined that $8.77, which was the value of our common stock
at the time of the Transaction and which was arrived at in an
arms-length negotiation between representatives of the
independent committee of SS&Cs board of directors and
representatives of investment funds affiliated with The Carlyle
Group, continued to represent the fair value of our common stock
in August 2006. The board of directors believed that the
business had not fundamentally changed since November 2005 and
that the likelihood of a liquidity event, including a potential
sale of the company or a public offering of stock, was remote.
Subsequently, we filed a registration statement for a proposed
public offering on June 13, 2007, which we withdrew on
October 29, 2008 due to market conditions.
In October 2007, in connection with our prior proposed public
offering and in anticipation of receiving a recommended initial
public offering price range from our managing underwriters, our
board of directors undertook a reassessment of the fair value of
our common stock as of July 31, 2006 (the October
2007 reassessment). Our board of directors reassessed the
fair value of our common stock using three generally accepted
valuation procedures: the income approach, the market
approachpublicly traded guideline company method and the
market approachtransaction method. The income approach is
a method used to value business interests that involves
estimating the future cash flows of the business, discounted to
their present value. The market approachpublicly traded
guideline company method estimates fair value using revenue and
EBITDA multiples derived from the stock price of publicly traded
companies engaged in a similar line of business. The market
approachtransaction method estimates fair value using
transactions involving the actual sale or purchase of similar
companies, and we reviewed eight transactions as part of this
analysis. We then compared the results of the various valuation
methods and other factors to calculate the enterprise value
attributable to common stockholders and the fair value of each
share, which we determined to be between $7.42 and $9.06 per
share. As the boards prior valuation of $8.77 not only
fell within the range of estimated values in the reassessment
but also reflected the arms-length price negotiated at the
time of the Transaction, the board determined that $8.77
continued to represent the fair value per share of our common
stock as of August 9, 2006.
In November 2006 and March 2007, we granted options to purchase
an aggregate of 284,750 shares of common stock at an
exercise price of $8.77 per share. In November 2006, we also
sold an aggregate of 75,650 shares of common stock to our
employees under the 2006 equity incentive plan for a purchase
price of $8.77 per share. The board believed that $8.77
continued to represent the fair value of the common stock at
this time because the business had not changed fundamentally and
a liquidity event continued to be remote. The board did not
conduct contemporaneous or retrospective valuations of the
common stock in connection with the November and March grants
because of the immaterial size of the awards and the cost of
such valuations.
Between May 10, 2007 and June 19, 2007, we granted
options to purchase an aggregate of 174,250 shares of
common stock at an exercise price of $11.64 per share, which our
board of directors determined was equal to the fair value of our
common stock. In setting the fair value of our common stock at
$11.64, our board used the same three generally accepted
valuation procedures that were used in its October 2007
reassessment: the income approach, the market
approachpublicly traded guideline company method and the
market approachtransaction method. We conducted the
assessment as of March 31, 2007 and then correlated the
results of the various valuation methods and other factors to
calculate the enterprise value attributable to common
stockholders and the fair value of each share. Our board
believed that the fair value of our common stock had increased
to $11.64 per share as of March 31, 2007 because of
51
improvements in the performance of our business and the
near-term outlook of our business, as well as managements
expectations regarding the imminence of our prior proposed
public offering. The fair value of our common stock had
increased since the July 2006 determinations under all three
methodologies for the following reasons:
Income Approach. Our board factored in timing
differences in the receipt of future cash flows, as well as the
reduction in net debt. In addition, while the expected timing of
a liquidity event was still believed to be remote as of
July 31, 2006, a public offering was imminent as of
March 31, 2007 and thus our board did not apply a liquidity
discount as of March 31, 2007.
Publicly Traded Guideline Company Method. Our board
determined that revenue and EBITDA multiples for guideline
companies generally increased or remained flat between
July 31, 2006 and March 31, 2007. Moreover, we
experienced improvements in the performance of our business
between July 31, 2006 and March 31, 2007, which
resulted in higher trailing twelve-month and projected revenues
and EBITDA. Under this methodology, our board also factored in
the reduction in net debt and the imminence of a public offering.
Transaction Method. Our board believed our valuation
was higher due to our improved revenue and EBITDA metrics
(against flat multiples of comparable transactions), our
reduction in net debt and the imminence of a public offering.
On January 6, 2009, we granted options to purchase an
aggregate of 255,041 shares of common stock at an exercise
price of $10.08 per share, which our board of directors
determined was equal to the fair value of our common stock. In
setting the fair value of our common stock at $10.08, our board
used two generally accepted valuation procedures: the income
approach and the market approachpublicly traded guideline
company method. The market approachtransaction method was
not utilized due to the lack of comparable transactions in the
evaluation period. We conducted the assessment as of
November 15, 2008 and then correlated the results of the
various valuation methods and other factors to calculate the
enterprise value attributable to common stockholders and the
fair value of each share. The board did not conduct
contemporaneous or retrospective valuations of the common stock
in connection with the January 2009 grants because of the
availability of the November 15, 2008 valuation, the
immaterial size of the awards and the cost of such valuation.
On December 31, 2009, we authorized the grant of options to
purchase an aggregate of 102,000 shares of common stock to
former employees of TheNextRound whom we hired in connection
with our acquisition of such business, and on January 27,
2010, we authorized the grant of an option to purchase
4,250 shares of common stock to one of our employees in
accordance with the terms of his offer letter. These options had
an exercise price of $14.53 per share, which our board of
directors determined was equal to the estimated fair value of
our common stock. In addition, on February 4, 2010, we
authorized the grant of options to purchase an aggregate of
2,125,000 shares of common stock at an exercise price of
$14.53 per share, which our board of directors determined was
equal to the fair value of our common stock, of which options
for the purchase of 318,750 shares were granted to our
named executive officers and the balance to employees designated
by our chief executive officer. On March 23, 2010, options for
the purchase of 1,615,085 shares were awarded to certain of our
non-executive officer employees designated by our chief
executive officer pursuant to his previously delegated authority.
52
On February 11, 2010, we authorized the grant of options to
purchase an aggregate of 81,600 shares of common stock to
former employees of GIPS whom we hired in connection with our
acquisition of such business (see note 16 to our consolidated
financial statements included elsewhere in this prospectus). The
options had an exercise price of $14.53 per share, which our
board of directors determined was equal to the estimated fair
value of our common stock. In estimating the fair value of our
common stock, our board used two generally accepted valuation
procedures: the income approach and the market
approachpublicly traded guideline company method. The
market approachtransaction method was not utilized due to
the lack of comparable transactions in the evaluation period. We
conducted the assessment as of November 30, 2009 and then
correlated the results of the various valuation methods and
other factors to calculate the enterprise value attributable to
common stockholders and the fair value of each share. The board
did not conduct contemporaneous or retrospective valuations of
the common stock in connection with the December 2009, February
2010 or March 2010 grants because of the availability of the
November 2009 valuation. In addition, the board of directors
believed that the business had not fundamentally changed since
November 2009 and that the $14.53 price continued to represent
the estimated fair value of our common stock in December 2009
and February 2010. In accordance with the authority delegated to
him on February 4, 2010, our chief executive officer
granted the March 2010 options at an exercise price of $14.53
per share, which he concluded continued to represent the fair
value of our common stock based on the fact that $14.53 was
within the estimated price range set forth in the preliminary
prospectus, and represented approximately 97% of the high-point
of such estimated range. Our board believed that the fair value
of our common stock had increased to $14.53 per share as of
November 30, 2009 from the January 2009 and April 2009
valuations because of improvements in the performance of our
business, the near-term outlook of our business and overall
strengthening of the equity markets during this period as
reflected by the impact on multiples of comparable companies, as
well as managements expectations regarding an initial
public offering in the first half of 2010.
Since the closing of our IPO, the exercise price per share of
all option grants has been set at the closing price of our
common stock on The NASDAQ Global Select Market on the
applicable date of the grant. In March 2010, we authorized the
grant, on the closing date of our IPO, of an option to purchase
21,250 shares of common stock to Jonathan Michael, who
became a member of our board of directors upon the closing of
our IPO. These options had an exercise price of $15.29 per
share, which was the closing price of our common stock on The
NASDAQ Global Select Market on April 6, 2010. On
May 27, 2010, we authorized the grant of options to
purchase an aggregate of 50,200 shares of our common stock
to certain former employees of TNR whom we hired in connection
with our acquisition of TNR. These options had an exercise price
of $16.49, the closing price on that of our common stock on The
NASDAQ Global Select Market on May 27, 2010. Of the total,
3,450 were granted to two employees who were also granted
options on December 31, 2009. Between June 10, 2010
and August 23, 2010, we authorized the grant of options to
purchase an aggregate of 63,000 shares of common stock to
various employees at exercise prices ranging from $13.52 to
$17.55, the closing prices of our common stock on each
respective grant date.
Stock option
modifications
In April 2007, our board of directors approved (i) the
vesting, as of April 18, 2007, of 50% of the
performance-based options granted to our employees through
March 31, 2007 that would have vested if the we had met our
EBITDA target for fiscal year 2006 (collectively, the 2006
53
Performance Options); (ii) the vesting, conditioned
upon us meeting our EBITDA target for fiscal year 2007, of the
other 50% of the 2006 Performance Options; and (iii) the
reduction of our EBITDA target for fiscal year 2007. We
re-measured those awards using the Black-Scholes option-pricing
model and assumptions reflecting current facts and circumstances
as of the modification date. As of the modification date, we
estimated the fair value of the modified performance-based
options to be $5.35. We estimated the fair value of our common
stock as of the modification to be $11.64. Our board used the
three generally accepted valuation procedures used in its March
2008 reassessment: the income approach, the market
approachpublicly traded guideline company method and the
market approachtransaction method. We used the following
assumptions to estimate the value of the modified
performance-based options: expected term to exercise of
3.5 years; expected volatility of 41.0%; risk-free interest
rate of 4.57%; and no dividend yield. Expected volatility is
based on a combination of our historical volatility adjusted for
the Transaction and historical volatility of our peer group.
Expected term to exercise is based on our historical stock
option exercise experience, adjusted for the Transaction. For
purposes of our discussion of stock-based compensation,
references to EBITDA targets and EBITDA target ranges refer to
our Consolidated EBITDA, as further adjusted to exclude acquired
EBITDA and cost savings.
In March 2008, our board of directors approved (1) the
vesting, conditioned upon our EBITDA for 2008 falling within the
targeted range, of the 2006 and 2007 performance-based options
that did not otherwise vest during 2007, and (2) the
reduction of our annual EBITDA target range for 2008. We
re-measured affected performance-based options using the
Black-Scholes option pricing model and assumptions reflecting
current facts and circumstances as of the modification date. We
estimated the weighted-average fair value of performance-based
options that vest upon the attainment of the 2008 EBITDA target
range to be $4.83. We estimated the fair value of our common
stock as of the modification to be $12.95. Our board used the
three generally accepted valuation procedures used in its March
2008 reassessment: the income approach, the market
approachpublicly traded guideline company method and the
market approachtransaction method. We used the following
weighted-average assumptions to estimate the option value:
expected term to exercise of 2.5 years; expected volatility
of 26.0%; risk-free interest rate of 1.735%; and no dividend
yield. Expected volatility is based on the historical volatility
of our peer group. Expected term to exercise is based on our
historical stock option exercise experience, adjusted for the
Transaction.
In February 2009, our board of directors (1) approved the
immediate vesting of the 2006, 2007 and 2008 performance-based
options that did not otherwise vest during 2006, 2007 or 2008
and (2) established our annual EBITDA target range for
2009. As of that date, we estimated the weighted-average fair
value of the performance-based options that were vested by the
board and those that vest upon the attainment of the 2009 EBITDA
target range to be $3.65. We estimated the fair value of our
common stock as of the modification to be $10.91 (the
April 1, 2009 analysis). Our board believed that the fair
value of our common stock had decreased from $11.64 per share as
of June 2007 to $10.91 as of April 1, 2009 because of the
then current economic crisis, as reflected by the impact on
multiples of comparable companies, and accompanying downturn in
general market conditions, mitigated to a degree by the fact
that our revenues and cash flows were not as proportionately
affected as revenues and cash flows of others in our industry.
Our board believed that the fair value of our common stock had
increased from $10.08 per share as of January 6, 2009
to $10.91 per share as of April 1, 2009 because of an
increase in the multiples of comparable companies and our
acquisition of Evare. Our board used two generally accepted
valuation procedures: the income approach and the market
approach-publicly traded guideline company method. The market
approach-transaction
54
method was not utilized due to the lack of comparable
transactions in the evaluation period. We used the following
weighted-average assumptions to estimate the option value:
expected term to exercise of 2.5 years; expected volatility
of 38.0%; risk-free interest rate of 1.2%; and no dividend
yield. Expected volatility is based on the historical volatility
of our peer group. Expected term to exercise is based on our
historical stock option exercise experience, adjusted for the
Transaction.
If factors change and we employ different assumptions in future
periods, the compensation expense that we record may differ
significantly from what we have recorded in the current period.
In addition, there is a risk that our estimates of the fair
values of our share-based compensation awards on the grant dates
may bear little resemblance to the actual values realized upon
the exercise, expiration, early termination or forfeiture of
those share-based payments in the future. Certain share-based
payments, such as employee stock options, may expire worthless
or otherwise result in zero intrinsic value as compared to the
fair values originally estimated on the grant date and reported
in our financial statements.
We believe that we have used reasonable methodologies,
approaches and assumptions consistent with the AICPAs
Practice Aid Valuation of Privately-Held-Company Equity
Securities Issued as Compensation to determine the fair
value of our common stock on the date of grant or the date of
the modification of a grant.
The values of outstanding vested and unvested options as of
December 31, 2010 based on the difference between the
public offering price of $17.60 per share and the exercise price
of the options outstanding are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options
|
|
|
Intrinsic value
|
|
|
|
|
Unvested
|
|
|
2,988,359
|
|
|
$
|
14,094,413
|
|
Vested
|
|
|
9,193,833
|
|
|
$
|
96,681,257
|
|
|
|
On February 4, 2010, our compensation committee approved,
effective upon the closing of our IPO:
|
|
|
the conversion of the outstanding superior options granted under
the 2006 equity incentive plan into performance-based options
that vest based on our EBITDA performance in 2010 and 2011,
which affected 1,680,868 outstanding options, of which 701,497
were held by our named executive officers;
|
|
|
the elimination of pre-determined EBITDA targets from the option
agreements and provision for the annual proposal of EBITDA
ranges by management, subject to approval by our board, which
EBITDA target range for 2010 was established by our board in a
subsequent meeting described below; and
|
|
|
the rolling over of performance-based options that
do not vest (in whole or in part) in any given year into
performance-based options for the following year, except as
otherwise provided by our board of directors. Under the 2006
equity incentive plan, our board has the authority to amend the
options to effect such a rollover and, generally,
has the authority to amend, suspend or terminate any option,
provided that, except with respect to specified corporate
events, neither the amendment, suspension nor termination of the
option shall, without the consent of the optionee, alter or
impair any rights or obligations under the option. The rollover
affected 689,007 outstanding unvested performance-based options,
of
|
55
|
|
|
which 280,600 were held by our named executive officers, and
affected 1,680,868 outstanding superior options, of which
701,497 were held by our named executive officers, that
converted to performance-based options upon the closing of our
IPO.
|
In addition, on February 24, 2010, our board established
our annual EBITDA target range for 2010 and eliminated the
previously established EBITDA target for 2011. The establishment
of the 2010 EBITDA target range affected 1,512,781 options, of
which 631,349 were held by our named executive officers,
including 840,434 superior options, of which 350,749 were held
by our named executive officers, that converted to 2010
performance-based options upon the closing of our IPO.
As of February 24, 2010, we estimated the weighted-average
fair value of the performance-based options that vest upon the
attainment of the 2010 EBITDA target range, including the
840,434 superior options that converted to 2010
performance-based options, to be $6.90. In estimating the common
stock value, we used our most recent equity valuation which
utilized the income approach and the guideline company method.
We used the following weighted-average assumptions to estimate
the option value: expected term to exercise of 2.5 years;
expected volatility of 43%; risk-free interest rate of 1.2%; and
no dividend yield. Expected volatility is based on the
historical volatility of our peer group. Expected term to
exercise is based on our historical stock option exercise
experience, adjusted for the Transaction. The total unearned
non-cash stock-based compensation cost related to the
performance-based awards that vest based upon achieving the 2010
EBITDA target, excluding the potential conversion of superior
options to performance-based options, that we could recognize
during 2010 is estimated to be approximately $4.6 million.
We estimate we could recognize approximately an additional
$5.8 million of non-cash stock-based compensation cost
related to the conversion of superior options to 2010
performance-based options during 2010.
Upon the closing of our IPO, we evaluated the likelihood that we
would achieve our 2010 EBITDA target. We recorded additional
stock-based compensation expense upon the closing of our IPO as
a result of the changes to the superior options, which was
determined based on (1) the likelihood of achieving our
2010 EBITDA target and (2) the period of time that elapsed
between the February modification and the closing of our IPO.
The superior options that converted to performance-based options
that vest based upon our EBITDA for 2011 will be re-measured
when our board determines the EBITDA target range for 2011.
On February 16, 2010, we entered into an amended and
restated stock option agreement with Mr. Stone governing an
option that SS&C originally granted to Mr. Stone on
February 17, 2000 under its 1998 stock incentive plan. Pursuant
to the amended and restated stock option agreement, the option
(which was previously an option to purchase 637,500 shares
of our common stock at an exercise price of $0.87 per
share) was amended to make it an option to purchase
637,500 shares of our Class A non-voting common stock at an
exercise price of $0.87 per share. The option was fully
vested at the date of the amendment, and such amendment did not
result in any incremental stock-based compensation expense. Mr.
Stone exercised the option on February 17, 2010 and
purchased 637,500 shares of our Class A
non-voting
common stock.
56
Income
taxes
The carrying value of our deferred tax assets assumes that we
will be able to generate sufficient future taxable income in
certain tax jurisdictions, based on estimates and assumptions.
If these estimates and related assumptions change in the future,
we may be required to record additional valuation allowances
against our deferred tax assets resulting in additional income
tax expense in our consolidated statement of operations. On a
quarterly basis, we evaluate whether deferred tax assets are
realizable and assess whether there is a need for additional
valuation allowances. The carrying value of our deferred tax
assets and liabilities is recorded based on the statutory rates
that we expect our deferred tax assets and liabilities to
reverse into income. We estimate the state rate at which our
deferred tax assets and liabilities will reverse based on
estimates of state income apportionment for future years. Each
of these estimates requires significant judgment on the part of
our management. In addition, we evaluate the need to provide
additional tax provisions for adjustments proposed by taxing
authorities.
As of September 30, 2010, we had $9.2 million of
liabilities for unrecognized tax benefits. All of the
unrecognized tax benefits, if recognized, would decrease our
effective tax rate and increase our net income. We recognize
accrued interest and penalties relating to unrecognized tax
benefits as a component of the income tax provision.
Results of
operations
The following tables set forth revenues (dollars in thousands)
and changes in revenues for the periods indicated:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percent change
|
|
|
|
Year ended December 31,
|
|
|
from prior period
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Software licenses
|
|
$
|
20,661
|
|
|
$
|
24,844
|
|
|
$
|
27,514
|
|
|
|
(16.8
|
)%
|
|
|
(9.7
|
)%
|
Maintenance
|
|
|
66,099
|
|
|
|
65,178
|
|
|
|
61,910
|
|
|
|
1.4
|
|
|
|
5.3
|
|
Professional services
|
|
|
20,889
|
|
|
|
24,352
|
|
|
|
17,491
|
|
|
|
(14.2
|
)
|
|
|
39.2
|
|
Software-enabled services
|
|
|
163,266
|
|
|
|
165,632
|
|
|
|
141,253
|
|
|
|
(1.4
|
)
|
|
|
17.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues
|
|
$
|
270,915
|
|
|
$
|
280,006
|
|
|
$
|
248,168
|
|
|
|
(3.2
|
)
|
|
|
12.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine months ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Software licenses
|
|
$
|
17,629
|
|
|
$
|
15,632
|
|
|
|
13
|
%
|
Maintenance
|
|
|
54,130
|
|
|
|
48,565
|
|
|
|
11
|
%
|
Professional services
|
|
|
15,384
|
|
|
|
14,872
|
|
|
|
3
|
%
|
Software-enabled services
|
|
|
155,652
|
|
|
|
120,801
|
|
|
|
29
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues
|
|
$
|
242,795
|
|
|
$
|
199,870
|
|
|
|
21
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
57
The following table sets forth the percentage of our total
revenues represented by each of the following sources of
revenues for the periods indicated:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended December 31,
|
|
|
Nine months ended September 30,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Software licenses
|
|
|
7.6
|
%
|
|
|
8.9
|
%
|
|
|
11.1
|
%
|
|
|
7.3
|
%
|
|
|
7.8
|
%
|
Maintenance
|
|
|
24.4
|
|
|
|
23.3
|
|
|
|
25.0
|
|
|
|
22.3
|
|
|
|
24.3
|
|
Professional services
|
|
|
7.7
|
|
|
|
8.7
|
|
|
|
7.0
|
|
|
|
6.3
|
|
|
|
7.5
|
|
Software-enabled services
|
|
|
60.3
|
|
|
|
59.1
|
|
|
|
56.9
|
|
|
|
64.1
|
|
|
|
60.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
|
58
Comparison
of nine months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009
Revenues
Our revenues consist primarily of software-enabled services and
maintenance revenues, and, to a lesser degree, software license
and professional services revenues. As a general matter, our
software license and professional services revenues fluctuate
based on the number of new licensing clients, while fluctuations
in our software-enabled services revenues are attributable to
the number of new software-enabled services clients as well as
the number of transactions processed for our existing clients
and total assets under management in our clients
portfolios. Maintenance revenues vary based on the rate by which
we add or lose maintenance clients over time and, to a lesser
extent, on the annual increases in maintenance fees, which are
generally tied to the consumer price index.
Revenues for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 were
$242.8 million, increasing 21% from $199.9 million for
the same period in 2009. The increase was primarily a result of
revenues from products and services that we acquired through our
acquisitions of Evare in March 2009, MAXIMIS in May 2009, TNR in
November 2009, Tradeware in December 2009, and GIPS in February
2010, which, in the aggregate, added $26.9 million in
revenues in the nine months ended September 30, 2010.
Organic revenues increased $11.5 million, and the favorable
impact from foreign currency translation accounted for
$4.5 million of the total increase, resulting from the
weakness of the U.S. dollar relative to currencies such as
the Canadian dollar and the Australian dollar.
Software
licenses
Software license revenues were $17.6 million and
$15.6 million for the nine months ended September 30,
2010 and 2009, respectively. The increase in software license
revenues of $2.0 million was primarily due to revenues from
acquisitions, which contributed $1.0 million, an increase
of $0.9 million in organic software license revenues and an
increase of $0.1 million related to foreign currency
translation. Software license revenues will vary depending on
the timing, size and nature of our license transactions. For
example, the average size of our software license transactions
and the number of large transactions may fluctuate on a
period-to-period
basis. For the nine months ended September 30, 2010, the
average size and number of perpetual license transactions
increased from those for the comparable period in 2009, while
the revenues from term licenses decreased from the prior year
period. Additionally, software license revenues will vary among
the various products that we offer, due to differences such as
the timing of new releases and variances in economic conditions
affecting opportunities in the vertical markets served by such
products.
Maintenance
Maintenance revenues were $54.1 million and
$48.6 million for the nine months ended September 30,
2010 and 2009, respectively. The increase in maintenance
revenues of $5.5 million, or 11%, was primarily due to
revenues from acquisitions, which contributed $5.5 million
in the aggregate, and the favorable impact from foreign currency
translation of $0.3 million. These increases were partially
offset by a decrease in organic maintenance revenues of
$0.3 million. We typically provide maintenance services
under one-year renewable contracts that provide for an annual
increase in fees, which are generally tied to the percentage
59
change in the consumer price index. Future maintenance revenue
growth is dependent on our ability to retain existing clients,
add new license clients, and increase average maintenance fees.
Professional
services
Professional services revenues were $15.4 million and
$14.9 million for the nine months ended September 30,
2010 and 2009, respectively. The increase of $0.5 million
was primarily due to revenues from acquisitions, which
contributed $1.6 million in the aggregate, and the
favorable impact from foreign currency translation of
$0.3 million, partially offset by a decrease of
$1.4 million in organic professional services revenues. The
decrease in organic revenues for the nine month period was
primarily due to a one-time significant project fee recognized
in the second quarter of 2009. Our overall software license
revenue levels and market demand for professional services will
continue to have an effect on our professional services revenues.
Software-enabled
services
Software-enabled services revenues were $155.7 million and
$120.8 million for the nine months ended September 30,
2010 and 2009, respectively. The increase in software-enabled
services revenues of $34.9 million, or 29%, was primarily
due to revenues from acquisitions, which contributed
$18.8 million, an increase of $12.3 million in organic
software-enabled services revenues and the favorable impact from
foreign currency translation of $3.8 million. Future
software-enabled services revenue growth is dependent on our
ability to retain existing clients, add new clients and increase
the level of services provided or average fees.
Cost of
revenues
The total cost of revenues was $122.4 million and
$102.4 million for the nine months ended September 30,
2010 and 2009, respectively. The gross margin was 50% for the
nine months ended September 30, 2010 compared to 49% for
the comparable period in 2009. Our cost of revenues increased by
$20.0 million primarily as a result of acquisitions, which
added cost of revenues of $11.8 million, an increase of
$3.1 million in amortization expense, an increase in costs
of $2.1 million related to foreign currency translation, an
increase of $1.6 million in costs to support organic
revenue growth and an increase in stock-based compensation of
$1.4 million. The increase in amortization expense is
primarily related to recent acquisitions.
Cost of
software license revenues
Cost of software license revenues consists primarily of
amortization expense of completed technology, royalties,
third-party software, and the costs of product media, packaging
and documentation. The cost of software license revenues was
$5.8 million and $6.3 million for the nine months
ended September 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively. The
decrease in cost of software licenses was primarily due to a
reduction of $0.5 million in amortization expense.
Cost of
maintenance revenues
Cost of maintenance revenues consists primarily of technical
client support, costs associated with the distribution of
products and regulatory updates and amortization of intangible
assets. The cost of maintenance revenues was $24.3 million
and $20.3 million for the nine months ended
September 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively. The increase in
cost of maintenance revenues of
60
$4.0 million, or 19%, was primarily due to acquisitions,
which added $2.0 million in costs, an increase of
$1.6 million in amortization expense, an increase in costs
of $0.4 million related to foreign currency translation and
an increase in stock-based compensation of $0.3 million,
partially offset by a decrease in costs to support organic
maintenance revenues of $0.3 million. Cost of maintenance
revenues as a percentage of these revenues was 45% for the nine
months ended September 30, 2010 compared to 42% for the
nine months ended September 30, 2009. The increase in costs
as a percentage of revenues is primarily related to our recent
acquisitions. The increase in amortization expense is primarily
related to recent acquisitions.
Cost of
professional services revenues
Cost of professional services revenues consists primarily of the
cost related to personnel utilized to provide implementation,
conversion and training services to our software licensees, as
well as system integration, custom programming and actuarial
consulting services. The cost of professional services revenues
was $10.2 million and $10.7 million for the nine
months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively. The
decrease in cost of professional services revenues of
$0.5 million, or 4%, was primarily related to a reduction
of $2.0 million in costs to support organic professional
services revenues, primarily as a result of one significant
implementation project that occurred during 2009, partially
offset by our acquisitions, which added $1.2 million in
costs, an increase in costs of $0.2 million related to
foreign currency translation and an increase in stock-based
compensation of $0.1 million. Cost of professional services
revenues as a percentage of these revenues was 67% for the nine
months ended September 30, 2010 compared to 72% for the
nine months ended September 30, 2009.
Cost of
software-enabled services revenues
Cost of software-enabled services revenues consists primarily of
the cost related to personnel utilized in servicing our
software-enabled services clients and amortization of customer
relationship intangible assets. The cost of software-enabled
services revenues was $82.1 million and $65.1 million
for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009,
respectively. The increase in cost of software-enabled services
revenues of $17.0 million, or 26%, was primarily related to
our acquisitions, which added $8.6 million in costs, an
increase of $3.9 million in costs to support the growth of
organic software-enabled services revenues, an increase of
$2.0 million in amortization expense, an increase in costs
of $1.5 million related to foreign currency translation and
an increase in stock-based compensation of $1.0 million.
Cost of software-enabled services revenues as a percentage of
these revenues was 53% for the nine months ended
September 30, 2010 compared to 54% for the nine months
ended September 30, 2009. The increase in amortization
expense is primarily related to recent acquisitions.
Operating
expenses
Total operating expenses were $61.6 million and
$49.5 million for the nine months ended September 30,
2010 and 2009, respectively. The increase in total operating
expenses of $12.1 million, or 24%, was primarily due to our
acquisitions, which added $7.0 million in costs, an
increase in stock-based compensation of $3.5 million, an
increase in costs of $1.0 million related to foreign
currency translation and an increase of $0.7 million in
costs to support organic revenues. These increases were
partially offset by a decrease of $0.1 million in
amortization expense related to intangible assets acquired in
prior years. Total operating
61
expenses as a percentage of total revenues were 25% for each of
the nine-month periods ended September 30, 2010 and 2009.
Selling and
marketing
Selling and marketing expenses consist primarily of the
personnel costs associated with the selling and marketing of our
products, including salaries, commissions and travel and
entertainment. Such expenses also include amortization of trade
name intangible assets, the cost of branch sales offices, trade
shows and marketing and promotional materials. Selling and
marketing expenses were $18.9 million and
$15.2 million for the nine months ended September 30,
2010 and 2009, respectively, representing 8% of total revenues
in each of those periods. The increase in selling and marketing
expenses of $3.7 million, or 24%, was primarily related to
our acquisitions, which added $2.6 million in costs, an
increase in stock-based compensation of $0.6 million, an
increase of $0.4 million in costs to support organic
revenues and an increase in costs of $0.2 million related
to foreign currency translation. These increases were partially
offset by a decrease of $0.1 million in amortization
expense related to intangible assets acquired in prior years.
Research and
development
Research and development expenses consist primarily of personnel
costs attributable to the enhancement of existing products and
the development of new software products. Research and
development expenses were $23.5 million and
$19.6 million for the nine months ended September 30,
2010 and 2009, respectively, representing 10% of total revenues
in each of those periods. The increase in research and
development expenses of $3.9 million, or 20%, was primarily
related to our acquisitions, which added $2.8 million in
costs, an increase in costs of $0.5 million related to
foreign currency translation, an increase in stock-based
compensation of $0.5 million and an increase of
$0.1 million in costs to support organic revenue growth.
General and
administrative
General and administrative expenses consist primarily of
personnel costs related to management, accounting and finance,
information management, human resources and administration and
associated overhead costs, as well as fees for professional
services. General and administrative expenses were
$19.2 million and $14.7 million for the nine months
ended September 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively,
representing 8% and 7%, of total revenues in each of those
periods, respectively. The increase in general and
administrative expenses of $4.5 million, or 31%, was
primarily related to an increase in stock-based compensation of
$2.4 million, our acquisitions, which added
$1.6 million in costs, an increase in costs of
$0.3 million related to foreign currency translation and an
increase in costs of $0.2 million to support organic
revenues.
Interest expense,
net
Net interest expense for the nine months ended
September 30, 2010 and 2009 was $23.8 million and
$27.8 million, respectively. Net interest expense is
primarily related to interest expense on debt outstanding under
our senior credit facility and
113/4% senior
subordinated notes due 2013. The decrease in interest expense
for both periods was primarily due to a decrease in outstanding
debt and lower average interest rates. During the nine-month
period ended
62
September 30, 2010, we used proceeds from our IPO to redeem
$71.75 million in principal amount of our
113/4% senior
subordinated notes due 2013.
Other Income
(Expense), Net
Other income, net for the nine months ended September 30,
2010 consisted primarily of a reduction of our contingent
consideration liability associated with TNR from
$1.0 million to $0.2 million. Other expense, net for
the nine months ended September 30, 2009 consisted
primarily of foreign currency transaction losses.
Loss on
extinguishment of debt
Loss from extinguishment of debt for the nine months ended
September 30, 2010 consisted of $4.2 million in note
redemption premiums and $1.3 million from the write-offs of
deferred financing costs associated with the redemption of
$71.75 million of our notes.
Provision for
income taxes
We had effective tax rates of 22.9% and 31.3% for the nine
months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively. The
expected effective tax rate for the year ended December 31,
2010 is forecasted to be between 25% and 27%. The difference
between the September 30, 2010 effective tax rate and the
forecasted tax rate for the year ended December 31, 2010 is
attributable to a release of uncertain income tax positions,
refunds and enacted rate changes in the first quarter of 2010.
Comparison
of years ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007
Revenues
Revenues were $270.9 million, $280.0 million and
$248.2 million in 2009, 2008 and 2007, respectively. The
revenue decrease in 2009 of $9.1 million, or 3.2%, was
primarily due to a decrease in revenues for businesses and
products that we have owned for at least 12 months, or
organic revenues, of $18.3 million, or 7%, partially offset
by revenues from products and services that we acquired through
our acquisitions of Micro Design Services, or MDS, in
October 2008, Evare in March 2009, MAXIMIS in May 2009 and
TNR in November 2009, which added $15.6 million in revenues
in the aggregate. The revenue decrease in 2009 was due in part
to the impact of the recent economic downturn and the
unfavorable impact from foreign currency translation of
approximately $6.4 million resulting from the strength of the
U.S. dollar relative to the Canadian dollar, British pound,
Australian dollar and the euro. Revenue growth in 2008 of
$31.8 million, or 13%, was driven by organic revenues,
which increased $28.7 million, or 12%. The remaining
$3.1 million increase was due to sales of products and
services that we acquired in our acquisitions of Northport,
which we acquired in March 2007, and MDS. The impact from
foreign currency translation in 2008 was not significant.
Software
licenses
Software license revenues were $20.7 million,
$24.8 million and $27.5 million in 2009, 2008 and
2007, respectively. The decrease in software license revenues
from 2008 to 2009 of $4.1 million was due to a decrease of
$5.1 million in organic software license revenues and a
decrease of
63
$0.4 million related to foreign currency translation,
partially offset by revenues of $1.4 million from
acquisitions. During 2009, we had fewer perpetual license
transactions than in 2008, but at a similar average size. The
decrease in software license revenues from 2007 to 2008 of
$2.7 million was due to a decrease of $3.3 million in
organic license sales, partially offset by acquisitions, which
added $0.6 million. During 2008, we had fewer perpetual
license transactions than in 2007, but at a similar average
size, offset by an increase in revenues from term licenses.
Software license revenues will vary depending on the timing,
size and nature of our license transactions. For example, the
average size of our software license transactions and the number
of large transactions may fluctuate on a
period-to-period
basis. Additionally, software license revenues will vary among
the various products that we offer, due to differences such as
the timing of new releases and variances in economic conditions
affecting opportunities in the vertical markets served by such
products.
Maintenance
Maintenance revenues were $66.1 million, $65.2 million
and $61.9 million in 2009, 2008 and 2007, respectively. The
increase in maintenance revenues of $0.9 million, or 1%, in
2009 was primarily due to revenue from acquisitions, which added
$5.0 million, partially offset by a decrease of
$2.7 million in organic maintenance revenues and a decrease
of $1.4 million related to foreign currency translation The
decrease in organic maintenance revenues was primarily due to a
decrease in fees for one significant customer. The increase in
maintenance revenues of $3.3 million, or 5%, in 2008 was
due in part to organic revenue growth of $2.8 million and
acquisitions, which added $0.5 million. We typically
provide maintenance services under one-year renewable contracts
that provide for an annual increase in fees, generally tied to
the percentage changes in the consumer price index. Future
maintenance revenue growth is dependent on our ability to retain
existing clients, add new license clients and increase average
maintenance fees.
Professional
services
Professional services revenues were $20.9 million,
$24.4 million and $17.5 million in 2009, 2008 and
2007, respectively. The decrease in professional services
revenues of $3.5 million, or 14%, in 2009 was primarily due
to a decrease of $4.9 million in organic revenues and a
decrease of $0.7 million related to foreign currency
translation, partially offset by revenues of $2.1 million
from acquisitions. The increase in professional services
revenues of $6.9 million, or 39%, in 2008 was primarily due
to organic growth of $6.0 million and acquisitions, which
contributed $0.9 million to the increase. The decrease in
organic revenues in 2009 and the growth in organic revenues in
2008 was primarily due to one significant professional services
project that commenced during the first quarter of 2008 and was
completed during 2008. Our overall software license revenue
levels and market demand for professional services will continue
to have an effect on our professional services revenues.
Software-enabled
services
Software-enabled services revenues were $163.3 million,
$165.6 million and $141.3 million in 2009, 2008 and
2007, respectively. The decrease in software-enabled services
revenues in 2009 of $2.3 million, or 1%, was primarily due
to a decrease of $5.5 million in organic revenues and a
decrease of $3.9 million related to foreign currency
translation, partially offset by revenues of $7.1 million
from acquisitions. Contributing to the decline in organic
revenues was a decrease in fees for one significant client and
decreases in the variable portion of our fees, which are tied
64
to our clients assets under management. The increase in
software-enabled services revenues in 2008 of
$24.3 million, or 17%, was primarily due to organic growth
of $23.2 million and acquisitions, which added
$1.1 million. Future software-enabled services revenue
growth is dependent on our ability to add new software-enabled
services clients, retain existing clients and increase average
software-enabled services fees.
Cost of
revenues
The total cost of revenues was $137.7 million,
$142.4 million and $128.9 million in 2009, 2008 and
2007, respectively. The gross margin increased from 48% in 2007
to 49% in 2008 and 2009. The decrease in total cost of revenues
in 2009 of $4.7 million was primarily due to cost
reductions of approximately $9.1 million as a result of our
workforce reduction in November 2008 and a decrease in costs of
$3.6 million related to foreign currency translation.
Stock-based compensation decreased by $0.5 million, as the
time-based options granted in August 2006 became fully vested
during the year and a lower valuation was ascribed to the 2009
performance-based options as compared to the 2008
performance-based options. These cost reductions were partially
offset by our acquisitions of MDS, Evare, MAXIMIS and TNR, which
added costs of $8.5 million in the aggregate. The increase
of $13.5 million in total cost of revenues in 2008 was
mainly due to personnel increases early in the year to support
revenue growth, particularly professional services and
software-enabled services, and acquisitions. Cost increases to
support our organic revenue growth were $12.5 million and
acquisitions added $1.5 million in costs, primarily in
software-enabled services revenues. In November 2008, we reduced
our workforce by approximately 9% in response to the anticipated
effects of the current economic downturn. Severance expenses
related to this action added $0.6 million in expenses to
total cost of revenues in 2008. These increases were offset by a
decrease of $1.1 million in stock-based compensation
expense, as 2007 stock-based compensation expense included
charges related to the vesting of 2006 performance options.
Cost of
software license revenues
The cost of software license revenues was $8.5 million,
$9.2 million and $9.6 million in 2009, 2008 and 2007,
respectively. The decrease in cost of software licenses in both
2009 and 2008 was primarily due to a reduction in amortization
expense under the percent of cash flows method, as a lower
percentage of current license revenues was deemed associated
with technology that existed at the date of the Transaction,
partially offset by amortization expense related to acquisitions
occurring in each of those years. Additionally, 2009 costs
include a decrease of $0.1 million related to foreign
currency translation.
Cost of
maintenance revenues
The cost of maintenance revenues was $27.6 million,
$26.9 million and $26.0 million in 2009, 2008 and
2007, respectively. The increase in cost of maintenance revenues
of $0.7 million in 2009 was primarily due to our
acquisitions, which added $1.9 million in costs, partially
offset by a decrease in costs of $0.6 million and a
decrease of $0.6 million related to foreign currency
translation. The increase in cost of maintenance revenues in
2008 was primarily due to additional costs of $0.7 million
and additional amortization expense of $0.3 million as a
result of increasing cash flows, partially offset by a decrease
of $0.1 million in stock-based compensation expense.
65
Cost of
professional services revenues
The cost of professional services revenue was
$14.2 million, $16.1 million and $14.3 million in
2009, 2008 and 2007, respectively. The decrease in cost of
professional services revenues of $1.9 million in 2009 was
primarily due to cost reductions of $3.6 million and a
decrease of $0.5 million related to foreign currency
translation, partially offset by acquisitions, which added
$2.2 million in costs. The increase in cost of professional
services revenues in 2008 was primarily due to an increase of
$0.4 million in costs, partially offset by a decrease of
$0.1 million in stock-based compensation expense.
Acquisitions added $0.8 million in costs.
Cost of
software-enabled services revenues
The cost of software-enabled services revenues was
$87.5 million, $90.3 million and $79.0 million in
2009, 2008 and 2007, respectively. The decrease in cost of
software-enabled services revenues of $2.8 million in 2009
was primarily due to cost reductions of $3.7 million, a
decrease of $2.3 million related to foreign currency
translation and a decrease of $0.5 million in stock-based
compensation expense, partially offset by our acquisitions,
which added $3.7 million in costs. The increase in cost of
software-enabled services revenues in 2008 was primarily due to
an increase of $10.8 million in costs, primarily related to
personnel and communications, to support the growth in organic
revenues and our acquisition of Northport, which added
$0.7 million, representing a full year of costs.
Additionally, severance expenses related to our workforce
reduction in November 2008 contributed $0.4 million and
amortization expense increased $0.3 million. These
increases were partially offset by a decrease of
$0.9 million in stock-based compensation expense.
Operating
expenses
Our total operating expenses were $66.1 million,
$72.5 million and $70.6 million in 2009, 2008 and
2007, respectively, representing 24%, 26% and 28%, respectively,
of total revenues in those years. The decrease in operating
expenses of $6.4 million in 2009 was primarily due to cost
reductions of approximately $7.6 million, which were
partially the result of non-recurring prior year expenses of
$1.6 million related to our prior proposed initial public
offering, which was withdrawn due to market conditions, and
severance expenses of $1.0 million related to our workforce
reduction in November 2008. Additionally, our acquisitions added
costs of $3.8 million, partially offset by a decrease of
$1.2 million in stock-based compensation expense and a
decrease of $1.4 million related to foreign currency
translation. The increase in operating expenses in 2008 was
primarily due to our expensing $1.6 million in costs
related our prior proposed initial public offering and severance
expenses of $1.0 million. Additionally, operating costs
increased $2.3 million, primarily related to personnel, and
amortization expense increased $0.2 million. These
increases were offset in part by a decrease of $2.6 million
in stock-based compensation expense, as 2007 stock-based
compensation expense included charges related to the vesting of
2006 performance options, a decrease of $0.5 million in
capital-based taxes and a decrease of $0.5 million in
expenses paid to Carlyle. Acquisitions added $0.4 million
in costs.
Selling and
marketing
Selling and marketing expenses were $20.4 million,
$19.6 million and $19.7 million in 2009, 2008 and
2007, respectively, representing 8%, 7% and 8%, respectively, of
total revenues in those years. The increase in selling and
marketing expenses of $0.8 million in 2009 was primarily
attributable to our acquisitions, which added $1.1 million
in costs, partially offset by a decrease
66
in stock-based compensation expense of $0.2 million and a
reduction in costs of $0.1 million. Additionally, a
decrease of $0.5 million related to foreign currency
translation was partially offset by an increase in costs of
$0.4 million. The decrease in selling and marketing
expenses in 2008 was primarily attributable to a decrease in
stock-based compensation expense of $0.6 million, partially
offset by acquisitions, which added $0.2 million in costs,
and an increase of $0.3 million in amortization expense.
Research and
development
Research and development expenses were $26.5 million,
$26.8 million and $26.3 million in 2009, 2008 and
2007, respectively, representing 10%, 10% and 11%, respectively,
of total revenues in those years. The decrease in research and
development expenses of $0.3 million in 2009 was primarily
due to a reduction in costs of $1.8 million, a decrease of
$0.5 million related to foreign currency translation and a
decrease in stock-based compensation expense of
$0.2 million, partially offset by our acquisitions, which
added $2.2 million in costs. The increase in research and
development expenses in 2008 was primarily due to an increase of
$0.6 million in costs to support organic revenue growth,
and severance expenses of $0.3 million, partially offset by
a decrease of $0.4 million in stock-based compensation
expense.
General and
administrative
General and administrative expenses were $19.2 million,
$26.1 million and $24.6 million in 2009, 2008 and
2007, respectively, representing 7%, 9% and 10%, respectively,
of total revenues in those years. The decrease in general and
administrative expenses of $6.9 million in 2009 was
primarily due to cost reductions of $6.2 million, which
were partially the result of non-recurring prior year expenses
of $1.6 million related our prior proposed initial public
offering, which was withdrawn due to market conditions, and
severance expenses of $0.7 million related to our workforce
reduction in November 2008. A decrease of $0.7 million in
stock-based compensation expense and a decrease of
$0.4 million related to foreign currency translation were
partially offset by our acquisitions, which added
$0.4 million in costs. The increase in general and
administrative expenses in 2008 was primarily due to an increase
in costs of $1.7 million, our expensing $1.6 million
in costs related to our prior proposed initial public offering
and prior year severance expenses of $0.7 million. These
increases were offset in part by a decrease of $1.6 million
in stock-based compensation expense, a decrease of
$0.5 million in capital-based taxes and a decrease of
$0.5 million in expenses paid to Carlyle. Acquisitions
added $0.2 million in costs.
Interest income,
interest expense and other income (expense), net
We had interest expense of $36.9 million and interest
income of less than $0.1 million in 2009 compared to
interest expense of $41.5 million and interest income of
$0.4 million in 2008. In 2007, we had interest expense of
$45.5 million and interest income of $0.9 million. The
decrease in interest expense in 2009 reflects the lower average
debt balance and lower average interest rates on the unhedged
floating portion of our debt as compared to 2008. The decrease
in interest income in 2009 is also related to the lower average
interest rates as compared to 2008. The decrease in interest
expense in 2008 reflects the lower average debt balance and
lower average interest rates on the floating portion of our debt
as compared to 2007. The decrease in interest income in 2008 is
also related to the lower average interest rates as compared to
2007. Other expense, net in 2009 consists primarily of foreign
currency transaction losses of
67
$1.5 million. Other income, net in 2008 consists primarily
of foreign currency transaction gains of $4.0 million,
partially offset by a $2.0 million loss we recorded
relating to our investment in a private company which we account
for under the equity method of accounting. Other income, net in
2007 consists primarily of foreign currency transaction gains of
$0.6 million, property tax refunds of $0.9 million and
$0.4 million related to the favorable settlement of a
liability accrued at the time of our acquisition of Financial
Models in 2005.
Provision for
income taxes
For the year ended December 31, 2009, we recorded a
provision for income taxes of $9.8 million. The difference
between the provision we recorded and the statutory rate was
primarily due to foreign tax benefits of approximately
$2.3 million, partially offset by state income taxes of
$1.8 million. For the year ended December 31, 2008, we
recorded a provision for income taxes of $7.1 million. The
difference between the provision we recorded and the statutory
rate was primarily due to foreign tax benefits of approximately
$2.3 million and a benefit of $0.6 million due to
changes in Canadian withholding rates enacted in December 2008.
These benefits were partially offset by state income taxes of
$1.0 million. For the year ended December 31, 2007, we
recorded a benefit of $0.5 million. The difference between
the benefit we recorded and the statutory rate was partially due
to changes in Canadian statutory tax rates enacted in June 2007
and December 2007, for which we recorded a benefit of
approximately $1.5 million, and other foreign tax benefits
of approximately $1.9 million. We had $66.4 million of
deferred tax liabilities and $16.7 million of deferred tax
assets at December 31, 2009. In future years, we expect to
have sufficient levels of taxable income to realize the net
deferred tax assets at December 31, 2009.
Liquidity and
capital resources
Our principal cash requirements are to finance the costs of our
operations pending the billing and collection of client
receivables, to fund payments with respect to our indebtedness,
to invest in research and development and to acquire
complementary businesses or assets. We expect our cash on hand,
cash flows from operations, availability under the revolving
credit portion of our senior credit facilities and the proceeds
from this offering to provide sufficient liquidity to fund our
current obligations, projected working capital requirements and
capital spending for at least the next twelve months.
Our cash and cash equivalents at September 30, 2010 were
$87.0 million, an increase of $67.9 million from
$19.1 million at December 31, 2009. The increase in
cash is due primarily to proceeds from our IPO of
$134.6 million and cash provided by operations, which was
partially offset by repayments of debt, cash used for an
acquisition and capital expenditures. Our cash and cash
equivalents at December 31, 2009 were $19.1 million, a
decrease of $10.2 million from $29.3 million at
December 31, 2008. Cash provided by operations was offset
by net repayments of debt and cash used for acquisitions and
capital expenditures.
Net cash provided by operating activities was $47.6 million
for the nine months ended September 30, 2010. Cash provided
by operating activities was primarily due to net income of
$23.2 million adjusted for non-cash items of
$30.5 million, partially offset by changes in our working
capital accounts (excluding the effect of acquisitions) totaling
$6.1 million. The changes in our working capital accounts
were driven by decreases in accounts payable and by increases in
prepaid income taxes and accounts receivable, partially offset
by increases in deferred revenues and accrued expenses and other
liabilities and decreases in prepaid expenses and other
68
assets. The increase in accounts receivable was primarily due to
the increase in revenue, partially offset by an improvement in
days sales outstanding. The increase in prepaid income
taxes was primarily related to a prepayment of income taxes.
Net cash provided by operating activities was $59.9 million
in 2009. Net cash provided by operating activities during 2009
was primarily the result of our net income of
$19.0 million, plus non-cash expenses of
$35.3 million, including depreciation and amortization,
stock compensation expense, amortization of loan origination
costs and a decrease in deferred income taxes and changes in our
working capital accounts totaling $5.6 million. Excluding
the effects of our acquisitions of TNR and Tradeware, our
working capital accounts generated cash primarily due to
improvements in the timing of collections and in days
sales outstanding, which decreased our outstanding accounts
receivable, and an increase in deferred revenues, primarily due
to an increase in maintenance revenues and a significant term
license fee received in 2009, partially offset by tax payments
made during 2009. Our acquisitions of TNR and Tradeware added
$4.6 million to our accounts receivable balance, which amount
has been excluded from the foregoing discussion.
Investing activities used net cash of $14.8 million for the
nine months ended September 30, 2010, primarily related to
$11.4 million cash paid for our acquisition of GIPS and
$3.4 million net cash paid for capital expenditures.
Investing activities used net cash of $54.1 million in
2009. Cash used by investing activities was primarily due to
$51.5 million cash paid for acquisitions and
$2.6 million in capital expenditures.
Financing activities provided net cash of $35.1 million for
the nine months ended September 30, 2010, representing
$134.6 million in net proceeds received from our IPO in
April 2010, $5.9 million received from the exercise of
stock options and related income tax benefits of
$3.5 million, partially offset by $107.7 million in
net repayments of debt and $1.2 million in purchases of
common stock for treasury. The repayment of debt during the
period is due to our use of proceeds from our IPO to redeem
$71.75 million in principal amount of our outstanding
113/4% senior
subordinated notes due 2013 at a redemption price of 105.875% of
the principal amount plus accrued and unpaid interest on such
amount to, but excluding, the date of redemption and
approximately $35.9 million of repayments on our senior
credit facility. Net cash used in financing activities was
$17.9 million in 2009, primarily related to net repayments
of debt.
69
Contractual
obligations
The following table summarizes our contractual obligations as of
December 31, 2009 that require us to make future cash
payments (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less than
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
More than
|
|
|
|
|
Contractual
obligations
|
|
Total
|
|
|
1 Year
|
|
|
1-3 Years
|
|
|
3-5 Years
|
|
|
5 Years
|
|
|
All other
|
|
|
|
|
Short-term and long-term debt
|
|
$
|
397,259
|
|
|
$
|
4,270
|
|
|
|
$187,989
|
|
|
$
|
205,000
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Interest
payments1
|
|
|
113,935
|
|
|
|
33,200
|
|
|
|
56,648
|
|
|
|
24,087
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating lease
obligations2
|
|
|
33,959
|
|
|
|
9,486
|
|
|
|
13,490
|
|
|
|
7,132
|
|
|
|
3,851
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase
obligations3
|
|
|
8,322
|
|
|
|
5,556
|
|
|
|
1,879
|
|
|
|
770
|
|
|
|
117
|
|
|
|
|
|
Uncertain tax positions and related
interest4
|
|
|
8,238
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,238
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total contractual obligations
|
|
$
|
561,713
|
|
|
$
|
52,512
|
|
|
|
$260,006
|
|
|
$
|
236,989
|
|
|
$
|
3,968
|
|
|
$
|
8,238
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
Reflects interest payments on our
term loan facility and associated interest rate swap agreement
at an assumed interest rate of three-month LIBOR of 0.26% plus
2.0% for U.S. dollar loans and CDOR of 0.38% plus 2.5% for
Canadian dollar loans, and required interest payments on our
senior subordinated notes of 11.75%.
|
|
(2)
|
|
We are obligated under
noncancelable operating leases for office space and office
equipment. The lease for the corporate facility in Windsor,
Connecticut expires in 2016. We sublease office space under
noncancelable leases. We received rental income under these
leases of $1.3 million, $1.4 million and
$1.5 million for the years ended December 31, 2009,
2008 and 2007, respectively. The effect of the rental income to
be received in the future has not been included in the table
above.
|
|
(3)
|
|
Purchase obligations include the
minimum amounts committed under contracts for goods and services.
|
|
(4)
|
|
As of December 31, 2009, our
liability for uncertain tax positions and related net interest
payable were $7.0 million and $1.3 million,
respectively. We are unable to reasonably estimate the timing of
such liability and interest payments in individual years beyond
twelve months due to uncertainties in the timing of the
effective settlement of tax positions.
|
Off-balance sheet
arrangements
We have no off-balance sheet arrangements that have or are
reasonably likely to have a current or future effect on our
financial condition, changes in financial condition, revenues or
expenses, results of operations, liquidity, capital expenditures
or capital resources that is material to investors.
Our credit
arrangements
The
Transaction
On November 23, 2005, in connection with the Transaction,
SS&C (1) entered into a new $350.0 million credit
facility, consisting of a $200.0 million term loan facility
with SS&C as the borrower, a $75.0 million-equivalent
term loan facility with a Canadian subsidiary as the borrower
($17.0 million of which is denominated in US dollars and
$58.0 million of which is denominated in Canadian dollars)
and a $75.0 million revolving credit facility and
(2) issued $205.0 million aggregate principal amount
of
113/4% senior
subordinated notes due 2013.
As a result of the Transaction, we are highly leveraged and our
debt service requirements are significant. At December 31,
2010, our total indebtedness was $290.8 million and we had
$75.0 million available for borrowing under our revolving
credit facility.
70
Senior credit
facilities
SS&Cs borrowings under the senior credit facilities
bear interest at either a floating base rate or a Eurocurrency
rate plus, in each case, an applicable margin. In addition,
SS&C pays a commitment fee in respect of unused revolving
commitments at a rate that will be adjusted based on our
leverage ratio. SS&C is obligated to make quarterly
principal payments on the term loan of $2.0 million per
year. Subject to certain exceptions, thresholds and other
limitations, SS&C is required to prepay outstanding loans
under the senior credit facilities with the net proceeds of
certain asset dispositions and certain debt issuances and 50% of
its excess cash flow (as defined in the agreements governing our
senior credit facilities), which percentage will be reduced
based on our reaching certain leverage ratio thresholds.
The obligations under our senior credit facilities are
guaranteed by SS&C Holdings and all of SS&Cs
existing and future material wholly owned
U.S. subsidiaries, with certain exceptions as set forth in
our credit agreement. The obligations of the Canadian borrower
are guaranteed by SS&C Holdings, SS&C and each of
SS&Cs U.S. and Canadian subsidiaries, with
certain exceptions as set forth in the credit agreement. The
obligations under the senior credit facilities are secured by a
perfected first priority security interest in all of
SS&Cs capital stock and all of the capital stock or
other equity interests held by SS&C Holdings, SS&C and
each of SS&Cs existing and future
U.S. subsidiary guarantors (subject to certain limitations
for equity interests of foreign subsidiaries and other
exceptions as set forth in our credit agreement) and all of
SS&C Holdings and SS&Cs tangible and
intangible assets and the tangible and intangible assets of each
of SS&Cs existing and future U.S. subsidiary
guarantors, with certain exceptions as set forth in the credit
agreement. The Canadian borrowers borrowings under the
senior credit facilities and all guarantees thereof are secured
by a perfected first priority security interest in all of
SS&Cs capital stock and all of the capital stock or
other equity interests held by SS&C Holdings, SS&C and
each of SS&Cs existing and future U.S. and
Canadian subsidiary guarantors, with certain exceptions as set
forth in the credit agreement, and all of SS&C
Holdings and SS&Cs tangible and intangible
assets and the tangible and intangible assets of each of
SS&Cs existing and future U.S. and Canadian
subsidiary guarantors, with certain exceptions as set forth in
the credit agreement.
The senior credit facilities contain a number of covenants that,
among other things, restrict, subject to certain exceptions,
SS&Cs (and its restricted subsidiaries) ability
to incur additional indebtedness, pay dividends and
distributions on capital stock, create liens on assets, enter
into sale and lease-back transactions, repay subordinated
indebtedness, make capital expenditures, engage in certain
transactions with affiliates, dispose of assets and engage in
mergers or acquisitions. In addition, under the senior credit
facilities, SS&C is required to satisfy and maintain a
maximum total leverage ratio and a minimum interest coverage
ratio. We were in compliance with all covenants at
September 30, 2010. When we are required to test for
compliance with all covenants at December 31, 2010, we
expect to be in compliance.
113/4% senior
subordinated notes due 2013
The
113/4% senior
subordinated notes due 2013 are unsecured senior subordinated
obligations of SS&C that are subordinated in right of
payment to all existing and future senior debt, including the
senior credit facilities. The senior subordinated notes will be
pari passu in right of payment to all future senior
subordinated debt of SS&C.
71
The senior subordinated notes are redeemable in whole or in
part, at SS&Cs option, at any time at varying
redemption prices that generally include premiums, which are
defined in the indenture. In addition, upon a change of control,
SS&C is required to make an offer to redeem all of the
senior subordinated notes at a redemption price equal to 101% of
the aggregate principal amount thereof plus accrued and unpaid
interest.
The indenture governing the senior subordinated notes contains a
number of covenants that restrict, subject to certain
exceptions, SS&Cs ability and the ability of its
restricted subsidiaries to incur additional indebtedness, pay
dividends, make certain investments, create liens, dispose of
certain assets and engage in mergers or acquisitions.
On May 24, 2010, using proceeds from our IPO, we redeemed
$71.75 million in principal amount of our senior
subordinated notes at a redemption price of 105.875% of the
principal amount plus accrued and unpaid interest on such
amount, to, but excluding, the date of redemption.
We intend to use our net proceeds from this offering and
$35.1 million of our existing cash resources to redeem up
to $66.6 million in principal amount of outstanding senior
subordinated notes, at a redemption price of 102.9375% of the
principal amount, plus accrued and unpaid interest. We may not
redeem more than 50% of the aggregate principal amount of notes
outstanding without a waiver from the lenders under our senior
credit facilities. If we redeem 50% of the aggregate principal
amount of the notes, we will redeem $66.6 million in
principal amount of notes for $68.6 million in cash, plus
accrued and unpaid interest. This redemption will result in a
loss on extinguishment of debt of approximately
$2.9 million in the period in which the notes are redeemed,
which includes a $2.0 million redemption premium and a
non-cash charge of approximately $0.9 million relating to
the write-off of deferred financing fees attributable to the
redeemed notes. For each $1.0 million decrease in the
principal amount redeemed, we will pay $1.0 million less in
cash to redeem the notes. See Use of proceeds for
additional information.
Covenant
compliance
Under the senior credit facilities, we are required to satisfy
and maintain specified financial ratios and other financial
condition tests. As of September 30, 2010, we were in
compliance with the financial and non-financial covenants. When
we are required to test for compliance with all covenants at
December 31, 2010, we expect to be in compliance. Our
continued ability to meet these financial ratios and tests can
be affected by events beyond our control, and we cannot assure
you that we will meet these ratios and tests. A breach of any of
these covenants could result in a default under the senior
credit facilities. Upon the occurrence of any event of default
under the senior credit facilities, the lenders could elect to
declare all amounts outstanding under the senior credit
facilities to be immediately due and payable and terminate all
commitments to extend further credit.
Consolidated EBITDA is a non-GAAP financial measure used in key
financial covenants contained in our senior credit facilities,
which are material facilities supporting our capital structure
and providing liquidity to our business. Consolidated EBITDA is
defined as earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and
amortization (EBITDA), further adjusted to exclude unusual items
and other adjustments permitted in calculating covenant
compliance under our senior credit facilities. We believe that
the inclusion of supplementary adjustments to EBITDA applied in
presenting Consolidated EBITDA is appropriate to provide
additional information to investors to
72
demonstrate compliance with the specified financial ratios and
other financial condition tests contained in our senior credit
facilities.
Management uses Consolidated EBITDA to gauge the costs of our
capital structure on a
day-to-day
basis when full financial statements are unavailable. Management
further believes that providing this information allows our
investors greater transparency and a better understanding of our
ability to meet our debt service obligations and make capital
expenditures.
Any breach of covenants in our senior credit facilities that are
tied to ratios based on Consolidated EBITDA could result in a
default under that agreement, in which case the lenders could
elect to declare all amounts borrowed due and payable and to
terminate any commitments they have to provide further
borrowings. Any such acceleration would also result in a default
under our indenture. Any default and subsequent acceleration of
payments under our debt agreements would have a material adverse
effect on our results of operations, financial position and cash
flows. Additionally, under our debt agreements, our ability to
engage in activities such as incurring additional indebtedness,
making investments and paying dividends is also tied to ratios
based on Consolidated EBITDA.
Consolidated EBITDA does not represent net income or cash flow
from operations as those terms are defined by GAAP and does not
necessarily indicate whether cash flows will be sufficient to
fund cash needs. Further, our senior credit facilities require
that Consolidated EBITDA be calculated for the most recent four
fiscal quarters. As a result, the measure can be
disproportionately affected by a particularly strong or weak
quarter. Further, it may not be comparable to the measure for
any subsequent four-quarter period or any complete fiscal year.
Consolidated EBITDA is not a recognized measurement under GAAP,
and investors should not consider Consolidated EBITDA as a
substitute for measures of our financial performance and
liquidity as determined in accordance with GAAP, such as net
income, operating income or net cash provided by operating
activities. Because other companies may calculate Consolidated
EBITDA differently than we do, Consolidated EBITDA may not be
comparable to similarly titled measures reported by other
companies. Consolidated EBITDA has other limitations as an
analytical tool, when compared to the use of net income, which
is the most directly comparable GAAP financial measure,
including:
|
|
|
Consolidated EBITDA does not reflect the provision of income tax
expense in our various jurisdictions;
|
|
|
Consolidated EBITDA does not reflect the significant interest
expense we incur as a result of our debt leverage;
|
|
|
Consolidated EBITDA does not reflect any attribution of costs to
our operations related to our investments and capital
expenditures through depreciation and amortization charges;
|
|
|
Consolidated EBITDA does not reflect the cost of compensation we
provide to our employees in the form of stock option
awards; and
|
|
|
Consolidated EBITDA excludes expenses that we believe are
unusual or non-recurring, but which others may believe are
normal expenses for the operation of a business.
|
73
The following is a reconciliation of net income to Consolidated
EBITDA as defined in our senior credit facilities.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine months ended
|
|
|
|
Year ended December 31,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
19,018
|
|
|
$
|
18,801
|
|
|
$
|
6,575
|
|
|
$
|
23,237
|
|
|
$
|
12,996
|
|
Interest expense, net
|
|
|
36,863
|
|
|
|
41,130
|
|
|
|
44,524
|
|
|
|
29,298
|
|
|
|
27,791
|
|
Income tax provision (benefit)
|
|
|
9,804
|
|
|
|
7,146
|
|
|
|
(458
|
)
|
|
|
6,913
|
|
|
|
5,928
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
36,028
|
|
|
|
35,038
|
|
|
|
35,047
|
|
|
|
30,356
|
|
|
|
26,707
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EBITDA
|
|
|
101,713
|
|
|
|
102,115
|
|
|
|
85,688
|
|
|
|
89,804
|
|
|
|
73,422
|
|
Purchase accounting
adjustments1
|
|
|
(93
|
)
|
|
|
(289
|
)
|
|
|
(296
|
)
|
|
|
(124
|
)
|
|
|
(163
|
)
|
Capital-based taxes
|
|
|
795
|
|
|
|
1,212
|
|
|
|
1,721
|
|
|
|
861
|
|
|
|
672
|
|
Unusual or non-recurring
charges2
|
|
|
1,990
|
|
|
|
1,480
|
|
|
|
(1,718
|
)
|
|
|
(449
|
)
|
|
|
1,683
|
|
Acquired EBITDA and cost
savings3
|
|
|
8,053
|
|
|
|
2,379
|
|
|
|
135
|
|
|
|
192
|
|
|
|
2,025
|
|
Stock-based compensation
|
|
|
5,607
|
|
|
|
7,323
|
|
|
|
10,979
|
|
|
|
9,181
|
|
|
|
4,363
|
|
Other4
|
|
|
1,201
|
|
|
|
1,346
|
|
|
|
2,158
|
|
|
|
114
|
|
|
|
977
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated EBITDA, as defined
|
|
$
|
119,266
|
|
|
$
|
115,566
|
|
|
$
|
98,667
|
|
|
$
|
99,579
|
|
|
$
|
82,979
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
Purchase accounting adjustments
include (a) an adjustment to increase revenues by the
amount that would have been recognized if deferred revenue were
not adjusted to fair value at the date of acquisitions and
(b) an adjustment to increase rent expense by the amount
that would have been recognized if lease obligations were not
adjusted to fair value at the date of the Transaction.
|
|
(2)
|
|
Unusual or non-recurring charges
include foreign currency transaction gains and losses, expenses
related to our prior proposed public offering, severance
expenses associated with workforce reduction, equity earnings
and losses on investments, proceeds and payments from legal and
other settlements, costs associated with the closing of a
regional office and other one-time gains and expenses.
|
|
(3)
|
|
Acquired EBITDA and cost savings
reflects the EBITDA impact of significant businesses that were
acquired during the period as if the acquisition occurred at the
beginning of the period and cost savings to be realized from
such acquisitions.
|
|
(4)
|
|
Other includes management fees and
related expenses paid to Carlyle and the non-cash portion of
straight-line rent expense.
|
Our covenant restricting capital expenditures for the year ended
December 31, 2010 limits expenditures to
$25.5 million. Actual capital expenditures through
September 30, 2010 were $3.3 million. Our covenant
requirements for total leverage ratio and minimum interest
coverage ratio and the actual ratios for the twelve months ended
September 30, 2010 are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Covenant
|
|
|
Actual
|
|
|
|
requirements
|
|
|
ratios
|
|
|
|
|
Maximum consolidated total leverage to Consolidated EBITDA Ratio
|
|
|
5.50
|
x
|
|
|
1.98
|
x
|
Minimum Consolidated EBITDA to consolidated net interest
coverage ratio
|
|
|
2.25
|
x
|
|
|
4.30
|
x
|
|
|
Consolidated total leverage ratio is defined in our senior
credit facilities at the last day of any period of four
consecutive fiscal quarters, as the ratio of (a) the
principal amount of all debt at such date, minus the amount, up
to a maximum amount of $30.0 million, of cash and cash
equivalents to (b) Consolidated EBITDA. Consolidated net
interest coverage ratio is defined in our senior credit
facilities as for any period, the ratio of (a) Consolidated
EBITDA for such period
74
to (b) total cash interest expense for such period with
respect to all outstanding indebtedness minus total cash
interest income for such period.
Recent accounting
pronouncements
In October 2009, the Financial Accounting Standards Board
(FASB) issued authoritative guidance related to
multiple-deliverable revenue arrangements. This updated
literature establishes the accounting and reporting guidance for
arrangements including multiple revenue-generating activities.
The standard provides amendments to the criteria for separating
deliverables, measuring and allocating arrangement consideration
to one or more units of accounting. The amendments in this
standard also establish a selling price hierarchy for
determining the selling price of a deliverable. Significantly
enhanced disclosures are also required to provide information
about a vendors multiple-deliverable revenue arrangements,
including information about the nature and terms, significant
deliverables, and its performance within arrangements. The
amendments also require disclosure regarding the significant
judgments made and changes to those judgments and regarding the
effect of the application of the relative selling-price method
on the timing or amount of revenue recognition. We adopted the
new requirements upon the effective date of the guidance and
such adoption did not affect our results of operations, cash
flows or financial position.
Quantitative and
qualitative disclosures about market risk
We do not use derivative financial instruments for trading or
speculative purposes. We have invested our available cash in
short-term, highly liquid financial instruments, having initial
maturities of three months or less. When necessary we have
borrowed to fund acquisitions.
At December 31, 2010, excluding capital leases, we had
total debt of $290.8 million, including $157.5 million
of variable interest rate debt. As of December 31, 2010, a
1% change in interest rates would result in a change in interest
expense of approximately $1.6 million per year.
At December 31, 2010, $27.9 million of our debt was
denominated in Canadian dollars. We expect that our Canadian
dollar-denominated debt will be serviced through operating cash
flows from our Canadian operations. A 5% change in the foreign
currency exchange rate between the U.S. dollar and Canadian
dollar would result in a change in our consolidated debt balance
of approximately $1.4 million.
During the year ended December 31, 2009 and the nine months
ended September 30, 2010, approximately 36% and 32% of our
revenues, respectively, were from clients located outside the
United States. A portion of the revenues from clients located
outside the United States is denominated in foreign currencies,
the majority being the Canadian dollar. While revenues and
expenses of our foreign operations are primarily denominated in
their respective local currencies, some subsidiaries do enter
into certain transactions in currencies that are different from
their functional currency. These transactions consist primarily
of cross-currency intercompany balances and trade receivables
and payables. As a result of these transactions, we have
exposure to changes in foreign currency exchange rates that
result in foreign currency transaction gains or losses, which we
report in other income (expense). These outstanding amounts were
reduced during 2009 and our foreign currency transaction gains
or losses were not material during the nine months ended
September 30, 2010. The amount of these balances can
fluctuate in the future as we bill customers and buy products or
services in currencies other than our functional currency, which
could increase our exposure to foreign currency exchange
75
rates in the future. We continue to monitor our exposure to
foreign currency exchange rates as a result of our foreign
currency denominated debt, our acquisitions and changes in our
operations. We do not enter into any market risk sensitive
instruments for trading purposes.
The foregoing risk management discussion and the effect thereof
are forward-looking statements. Actual results in the future may
differ materially from these projected results due to actual
developments in global financial markets. The analytical methods
used by us to assess and minimize risk discussed above should
not be considered projections of future events or losses.
76
Business
Overview
We are a leading provider of mission-critical, sophisticated
software products and software-enabled services that allow
financial services providers to automate complex business
processes and effectively manage their information processing
requirements. Our portfolio of software products and rapidly
deployable software-enabled services allows our clients to
automate and integrate front-office functions such as trading
and modeling, middle-office functions such as portfolio
management and reporting, and back-office functions such as
accounting, performance measurement, reconciliation, reporting,
processing and clearing. Our solutions enable our clients to
focus on core operations, better monitor and manage investment
performance and risk, improve operating efficiency and reduce
operating costs. We provide our solutions globally to more than
4,500 clients, principally within the institutional asset
management, alternative investment management and financial
institutions vertical markets. In addition, our clients include
commercial lenders, corporate treasury groups, insurance and
pension funds, municipal finance groups and real estate property
managers.
We provide the global financial services industry with a broad
range of software-enabled services, which consist of
software-enabled outsourcing services and subscription-based
on-demand
software that are managed and hosted at our facilities, and
specialized software products, which are deployed at our
clients facilities. Our software-enabled services, which
combine the strengths of our proprietary software with our
domain expertise, enable our clients to contract with us to
provide many of their mission-critical and complex business
processes. For example, we utilize our software to offer
comprehensive fund administration services for alternative
investment managers, including fund manager services, transfer
agency services, fund of funds services, tax processing and
accounting. We offer clients the flexibility to choose from
multiple software delivery options, including on-premise
applications and hosted, multi-tenant or dedicated applications.
Additionally, we provide certain clients with targeted, blended
solutions based on a combination of our various software and
software-enabled services. We believe that our software-enabled
services provide superior client support and an attractive
alternative to clients that do not wish to install, manage and
maintain complicated financial software. The following table
describes selected functionality of our software products and
software enabled services and the eight vertical markets that we
serve.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Treasury,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Real
|
|
|
|
Alternative
|
|
|
|
|
|
banks &
|
|
|
Institutional
|
|
|
Insurance &
|
|
|
|
|
|
Municipal
|
|
|
estate
|
|
|
|
investment
|
|
|
Financial
|
|
|
credit
|
|
|
asset
|
|
|
pension
|
|
|
Commercial
|
|
|
finance
|
|
|
property
|
|
Selected functionality
|
|
managers
|
|
|
markets
|
|
|
unions
|
|
|
managers
|
|
|
funds
|
|
|
lenders
|
|
|
groups
|
|
|
managers
|
|
|
|
|
Portfolio Management/Accounting
|
|
|
ü
|
|
|
|
ü
|
|
|
|
ü
|
|
|
|
ü
|
|
|
|
ü
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trading/Treasury Operations
|
|
|
ü
|
|
|
|
ü
|
|
|
|
ü
|
|
|
|
ü
|
|
|
|
ü
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial Modeling
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ü
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ü
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ü
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fund Administration Services
|
|
|
ü
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loan Management/Accounting
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ü
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ü
|
|
|
|
ü
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Money Market Processing
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ü
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property Management
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ü
|
|
|
|
77
Our business model is characterized by substantial contractually
recurring revenues, high operating margins and significant cash
flow. We generate revenues primarily through our high-value
software-enabled services, which are typically sold on a
long-term subscription basis and integrated into our
clients business processes. Our software-enabled services
are generally provided under non-cancelable contracts with
initial terms of one to five years that require monthly or
quarterly payments and are subject to automatic annual renewal
at the end of the initial term unless terminated by either
party. We also generate revenues by licensing our software to
clients through either perpetual or term licenses and by selling
maintenance services. Maintenance services are generally
provided under annually renewable contracts. As a consequence, a
significant portion of our revenues consists of subscription
payments and maintenance fees and is contractually recurring in
nature. Our pricing typically scales as a function of our
clients assets under management, the complexity of asset
classes managed and the volume of transactions.
Our contractually recurring revenue model helps us minimize the
fluctuations in revenues and cash flows typically associated
with
up-front,
perpetual software license revenues and enhances our ability to
manage costs. Our contractually recurring revenues, which we
define as our software-enabled services and maintenance
revenues, represented 85% of total revenues in the year ended
December 31, 2009, and 86% of total revenues in the nine
months ended September 30, 2010. We have experienced
average revenue retention rates in each of the last five years
of greater than 90% on our software-enabled services and
maintenance contracts for our core enterprise products. We
believe that the high value-added nature of our products and
services has enabled us to maintain our high revenue retention
rates and significant operating margins.
Through a combination of organic growth and acquisitions, we
generated revenues of $270.9 million for the year ended
December 31, 2009 as compared to revenues of
$248.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2007.
Our revenues increased from $199.9 million in the nine
months ended September 30, 2009 to $242.8 million in
the nine months ended September 30, 2010. We generated 83%
of our revenues in the nine months ended September 30, 2010
from clients in North America and 17% from clients outside North
America. Our revenues are highly diversified, with our largest
client in the nine months ended September 30, 2010
accounting for less than 5% of our revenues. Additional
financial information, including geographic information, is
available in our consolidated financial statements, including
the notes thereto.
Our
industry
We serve a number of vertical markets within the financial
services industry, including alternative investment funds,
investment management firms, insurance companies, banks and
brokerage firms. The financial crisis negatively affected each
of these markets and contributed to a significant decline in
asset value. In particular, alternative investment funds, such
as hedge funds, experienced a shift from equities to money
market funds, treasuries and other liquid instruments. These
factors all contributed to reducing revenues among the financial
services firms, which, in turn, affected their access to credit,
spending ability and, in some cases, their long-term viability.
With improvements in the financial services industry since the
height of the financial crisis, we have experienced increased
demand for our products and services, as evidenced by the
increase in our organic revenues in the nine months ended
September 30, 2010 from the comparable period of 2009, and
we expect to benefit from continued improvements in the
financial services industry.
78
Opportunities
We believe that we are well positioned to address the ongoing
business and regulatory needs of the clients we seek to serve in
the financial services industry, taking into account a
competitive environment that reflects the following competitive
dynamics.
Asset Classes and Securities Products Growing in Volume and
Complexity. Investment professionals must increasingly
track and invest in numerous types of asset classes far more
complex than traditional equity and debt instruments. These
assets require more sophisticated systems to automate functions
such as trading and modeling, portfolio management, accounting,
performance measurement, reconciliation, reporting, processing
and clearing. Manual tracking of orders and other transactions
is not effective for these assets. In addition, as the business
knowledge requirements increase, firms see increasing value in
outsourcing the management of these assets to firms such as
SS&C who offer software-enabled services.
Increasing Regulatory Requirements and Investor Demand for
Transparency. Recent market and economic conditions
have led to new legislation and numerous proposals for changes
in the regulation of the financial services industry, including
significant additional legislation and regulation in the United
States. Several high-profile scandals have also led to increased
investor demand for transparency. The financial services
industry must meet these complicated and burdensome
requirements, and many have struggled to do so. In addition, as
the financial services industry continues to grow in complexity,
we anticipate regulatory oversight will continue to impose new
demands on financial services providers. The expectation is that
hedge funds may start to experience similar regulatory
pressures. In addition, financial services providers continue to
face increasing regulatory oversight from domestic organizations
such as the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority,
U.S. Treasury Department, Securities and Exchange
Commission, New York Stock Exchange, National Association of
Insurance Commissioners and U.S. Department of Labor as
well as foreign regulatory bodies such as the Office of
Supervision of Financial Institutions in Ottawa, Canada,
Financial Services Association in London, England and Ministry
of Finance in Tokyo, Japan.
Increasing Willingness to Implement Solutions from
Independent Software Vendors and Outsource IT
Operations. Historically, financial services providers
have relied in large part on their internal IT departments to
supply the systems required to manage, analyze and control vast
amounts of data. Rather than internally developing applications
that automate business processes, many financial services
providers are implementing advanced software solutions from
independent software vendors to replace their current systems,
which are often cumbersome, time-consuming to operate and
expensive to implement, customize, update and support.
Additionally, financial services providers globally are
outsourcing a growing percentage of their business processes to
benefit from
best-in-class
process execution, focus on core operations, quickly expand into
new markets, reduce costs, streamline organizations, handle
increased transaction volumes and ensure system redundancy. We
believe that one of the key challenges faced by investment
management industry participants is how to expand their use of
third-party service providers to address the increasing
complexity of new products and the growing investor and
regulatory information demands. For example, many alternative
investment firms lack the substantial in-house IT resources
necessary to establish and manage the complex IT infrastructures
their investment professionals require. These firms increasingly
seek
end-to-end
solutions that enable them to outsource their operations from
the front-office through the back-office.
79
Intense Global Competition Among Financial Services
Providers. Competition within the financial services
industry has become intense as financial services providers
expand into new markets and offer new services to their clients
in an effort to maximize their profitability. Additionally, a
significant number of small- and medium-sized organizations,
such as hedge funds, have begun to compete with large financial
institutions as they seek to attract new clients whose assets
they can manage. As traditional equity and debt instruments
become more commoditized, financial services providers are
expanding into more complex product and service offerings to
drive profitability. In response to these increasingly
competitive conditions worldwide, financial services
organizations seek to rapidly expand into new markets, manage
operational enterprise risk, increase front-office productivity
and drive cost savings by utilizing software to automate and
integrate their mission-critical and labor intensive business
processes.
Our competitive
strengths
We believe that our position in the marketplace results from
several key competitive strengths, including:
Enhanced Capability Through Software Ownership. We
use our proprietary software products and infrastructure to
provide our software-enabled services, strengthening our overall
operating margins and providing a competitive advantage. Because
we primarily use our own proprietary software in the execution
of our software-enabled services and generally own and control
our products source code, we can quickly identify and
deploy product improvements and respond to client feedback,
enhancing the competitiveness of our software and
software-enabled service offerings. This continuous feedback
process provides us with a significant advantage over many of
our competitors, specifically those software competitors that do
not provide a comparable model and therefore do not have the
same level of hands-on experience with their products.
Broad Portfolio of Products and Services Focused on Financial
Services Organizations. Our broad portfolio of over 60
software products and software-enabled services allows
professionals in the financial services industry to efficiently
and rapidly analyze and manage information, increase
productivity, devote more time to critical business decisions
and reduce costs. Our products and services automate our
clients most mission-critical, complex business processes,
and improve their operational efficiency. We believe our product
and service offerings position us as a leader within the
specific verticals of the financial services software and
services market in which we compete. We provide highly flexible,
scalable and cost-effective solutions that enable our clients to
track complex securities, better employ sophisticated investment
strategies, scale efficiently and meet evolving regulatory
requirements. Our solutions allow our clients to automate and
integrate their front-office, middle-office and back-office
functions, thus enabling straight-through processing.
Independent Fund Administration Services. The
third-party service providers that participate in the
alternative investment market include auditors, fund
administrators, attorneys, custodians and prime brokers. Each
provider performs a valuable function with the intention of
providing transparency of the funds assets and the
valuation of those assets. Conflicts of interest may arise when
the above parties attempt to provide more than one of these
services. The industry is increasingly becoming aware of these
conflicts and seeking independent fund administrators such as
SS&C.
Highly Attractive Operating Model. We believe we
have a highly attractive operating model due to the
contractually recurring nature of our revenues, the scalability
of our software and
80
software-enabled services, the significant operating cash flow
we generate and our highly effective sales and marketing model.
Growing Contractually Recurring Revenues. We
continue to focus on growing our contractually recurring
revenues from our software-enabled services and our maintenance
contracts because they provide greater predictability in the
operation of our business and enable us to strengthen long-term
relationships with our clients. Contractually recurring revenues
represented 86% of total revenues for the nine months ended
September 30, 2010, up from 52% of total revenues in 2000.
Scalable Software and Software-enabled Services. We
have designed our software and software-enabled services to
accommodate significant additional business volumes with limited
incremental costs. The ability to generate additional revenues
from increased volumes without incurring substantial incremental
costs provides us with opportunities to improve our operating
margins.
Significant Operating Cash Flow. We are able to
generate significant operating cash flows due to our strong
operating margins and the relatively modest capital requirements
needed to grow our business.
Highly Effective Sales and Marketing Model. We
utilize a direct sales force model that benefits from
significant direct participation by senior management. We
achieve significant efficiency in our sales model by leveraging
the Internet as a direct marketing medium. We currently deliver
over 400,000 electronic newsletters to industry participants
worldwide approximately every two weeks. These eBriefings
are integrated with our corporate website, www.ssctech.com,
and are the source for a substantial number of our sales leads.
Our deep domain knowledge and extensive participation in
day-to-day
investment, finance and fund administration activities enable us
to create informative and timely articles that are the basis of
our eBriefings.
Deep Domain Knowledge and Extensive Industry
Experience. As of December 31, 2010, we had
1,195 development, service and support professionals with
significant expertise across the eight vertical markets that we
serve and a deep working knowledge of our clients
businesses. By leveraging our domain expertise and knowledge, we
have developed, and continue to improve, our mission-critical
software products and services to enable our clients to overcome
the complexities inherent in their businesses. For example, our
Complete Asset Management, Reporting and Accounting, or CAMRA,
software, which supports the entire portfolio management
function across all typical securities transactions, was
originally released in 1989 and has been continually updated to
meet our clients new business requirements. We were
founded in 1986 by William C. Stone, who has served as our
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer since our inception. Our
senior management team has a track record of operational
excellence and an average of more than 15 years of
experience in the software and financial services industries.
Trusted Provider to Our Highly Diversified and Growing Client
Base. By providing mission-critical, reliable software
products and services for more than 20 years, we have
become a trusted provider to the financial services industry. We
have developed a large and growing installed base within
multiple segments of the financial services industry. Our
clients include some of the largest and most well-recognized
firms in the financial services industry. We believe that our
high-quality products and superior services have led to
long-term client relationships, some of which date from our
earliest days of operations. Our strong client relationships,
coupled with the fact that many of our current clients use our
products for a relatively small
81
portion of their total funds and investment vehicles under
management, provide us with a significant opportunity to sell
additional solutions to our existing clients and drive future
revenue growth at lower cost.
Superior Client Support and Focus. Our ability to
rapidly deliver improvements and our reputation for superior
service have proven to be a strong competitive advantage when
developing client relationships. We provide our larger clients
with a dedicated client support team whose primary
responsibility is to resolve questions and provide solutions to
address ongoing needs. We also offer the SS&C Solution
Center, an interactive website that serves as an exclusive
online client community where clients can find answers to
product questions, exchange information, share best practices
and comment on business issues. We believe a close and active
service and support relationship significantly enhances client
satisfaction, strengthens client relationships and furnishes us
with information regarding evolving client issues.
Our growth
strategy
We intend to be the leading provider of superior technology
solutions to the financial services industry. The key elements
of our growth strategy include:
Continue to Develop Software-Enabled Services and New
Proprietary Software. Since our founding in 1986, we
have focused on building substantial financial services domain
expertise through close working relationships with our clients.
We have developed a deep knowledge base that enables us to
respond to our clients most complex financial, accounting,
actuarial, tax and regulatory needs. We intend to maintain and
enhance our technological leadership by using our domain
expertise to build valuable new software-enabled services and
solutions, continuing to invest in internal development and
opportunistically acquiring products and services that address
the highly specialized needs of the financial services industry.
Our internal product development team works closely with
marketing and client service personnel to ensure that product
evolution reflects developments in the marketplace and trends in
client requirements. In addition, we intend to continue to
develop our products in a cost-effective manner by leveraging
common components across product families. We believe that we
enjoy a competitive advantage because we can address the
investment and financial management needs of high-end clients by
providing industry-tested products and services that meet global
market demands and enable our clients to automate and integrate
their front-, middle- and back-office functions for improved
productivity, reduced manual intervention and bottom-line
savings. Our software-enabled services revenues increased from
$30.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2004 to
$163.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2009,
representing a compound annual growth rate of 40%. For the nine
months ended September 30, 2009 to the nine months ended
September 30, 2010 our software-enabled services revenues
increased from $120.8 million to $155.7 million.
Expand Our Client Base. Our client base of more than
4,500 clients represents a fraction of the total number of
financial services providers globally. As a result, we believe
there is substantial opportunity to grow our client base over
time as our products become more widely adopted. We have a
substantial opportunity to capitalize on the increasing adoption
of mission-critical, sophisticated software and software-enabled
services by financial services providers as they continue to
replace inadequate legacy solutions and custom in-house
solutions that are inflexible and costly to maintain.
82
Increase Revenues from Existing Clients. We believe
our established client base presents a substantial opportunity
for growth. Revenues from our existing clients generally grow
along with the amount and complexity of assets that they manage
and the volume of transactions that they execute. While we
expect to continue to benefit from the financial services
industrys growing assets under management, expanding asset
classes, and increasing transaction volumes, we also intend to
leverage our deep understanding of the financial services
industry to identify other opportunities to increase our
revenues from our existing clients. Many of our current clients
use our products only for a portion of their total assets under
management and investment funds, providing us with significant
opportunities to expand our business relationship and revenues.
We have been successful in, and expect to continue to focus our
marketing efforts on, providing additional modules or features
to the products and services our existing clients already use,
as well as cross-selling our other products and services.
Additionally, we intend to sell additional software products and
services to new divisions and new funds of our existing client
base. Our client services team is primarily responsible for
expanding our relationships with current clients. Moreover, our
high quality of service helps us maintain significant client
retention rates and longer lasting client relationships.
Continue to Capitalize on Acquisitions of Complementary
Businesses and Technologies. We intend to continue to
employ a highly disciplined and focused acquisition strategy to
broaden and enhance our product and service offerings, expand
our intellectual property portfolio, add new clients and
supplement our internal development efforts. We believe our
acquisitions have been an extension of our research and
development effort that has enabled us to purchase proven
products and remove the uncertainties associated with software
development projects. We will seek to opportunistically acquire,
at reasonable valuations, businesses, products and technologies
in our existing or complementary vertical markets that will
enable us to better satisfy our clients rigorous and
evolving needs. We have a proven ability to integrate
complementary businesses as demonstrated by the 31 businesses we
have acquired since 1995. Our experienced senior management team
leads a rigorous evaluation of our acquisition candidates to
ensure that they satisfy our product or service needs and will
successfully integrate with our business while meeting our
targeted financial goals. As a result, our acquisitions have
contributed marketable products or services that have added to
our revenues. Through the broad reach of our direct sales force
and our large installed client base, we believe we can market
these acquired products and services to a large number of
prospective clients. Additionally, we have been able to improve
the operational performance and profitability of our acquired
businesses, creating significant value for our stockholders.
Strengthen Our International Presence. We believe
that there is a significant market opportunity to provide
software and services to financial services providers outside
North America. In the nine months ended September 30, 2010,
we generated 17% of our revenues from clients outside North
America. We are building our international operations in order
to increase our sales outside North America. We plan to continue
to expand our international market presence by leveraging our
existing software products and software-enabled services. For
example, we believe that the rapidly growing alternative
investment management market in Europe presents a compelling
growth opportunity.
Our
acquisitions
We intend to continue to employ a highly disciplined and focused
acquisition strategy to broaden and enhance our product and
service offerings, add new clients and supplement our internal
development efforts. Our acquisitions have enabled us to expand
our product and
83
service offerings into new markets or client bases within the
financial services industry. The addition of new products and
services has also enabled us to market other products and
services to acquired client bases. We believe our acquisitions
have been an extension of our research and development effort
and have enabled us to purchase proven products and remove the
uncertainties sometimes associated with software development
projects.
Since 1995, we have acquired 31 businesses within our industry.
These acquisitions have contributed marketable products and
services, which have added to our revenues and earnings. We
believe we have generally been able to improve the operating
performance and profitability of our acquired businesses. We
seek to reduce the costs of the acquired businesses by
consolidating sales and marketing efforts and by eliminating
redundant administrative tasks and research and development
expenses. In many cases, we have also been able to increase
revenues generated by acquired products and services by
leveraging our existing products and services, larger sales
capabilities and client base.
We generally seek to acquire companies that satisfy our
financial metrics, including expected return on investment, and
that:
|
|
|
provide complementary products or services in the financial
services industry;
|
|
|
possess proven technology and an established client base that
will provide a source of ongoing revenue and to whom we may be
able to sell existing products and services;
|
|
|
expand our intellectual property portfolio to complement our
business;
|
|
|
address a highly specialized problem or a market niche in the
financial services industry;
|
|
|
expand our global reach into strategic geographic
markets; and
|
|
|
have solutions that lend themselves to being delivered as
software-enabled services.
|
We believe, based on our experience, that there are numerous
solution providers addressing highly particularized financial
services needs or providing specialized services that would meet
our disciplined acquisition criteria.
The following table provides a list of acquisitions we have made
since 1995.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acquisition
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
date
|
|
Acquired business
|
|
Contract purchase price*
|
|
Acquired capabilities, products and services
|
|
|
March 1995
|
|
Chalke
|
|
$10,000,000
|
|
Expanded insurance footprint with PTS actuarial product
|
November 1997
|
|
Mabel Systems
|
|
$850,000 and 109,224 shares
|
|
Entered Benelux market with investment accounting product
|
December 1997
|
|
Shepro Braun Systems
|
|
1,500,000 shares
|
|
Entered hedge fund and family office markets with Total Return
product
|
March 1998
|
|
Quantra
|
|
$2,269,800 and 819,028 shares
|
|
Entered the real estate property management market with SKYLINE
product
|
April 1998
|
|
The Savid Group
|
|
$821,500
|
|
Expanded debt and derivative product offerings
|
84
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acquisition
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
date
|
|
Acquired business
|
|
Contract purchase price*
|
|
Acquired capabilities, products and services
|
|
|
March 1999
|
|
HedgeWare
|
|
1,028,524 shares
|
|
Expanded product offerings for the hedge fund and family office
markets
|
March 1999
|
|
Brookside
|
|
41,400 shares
|
|
Expanded our consulting services capabilities
|
November 2001
|
|
Digital Visions
|
|
$1,350,000
|
|
Entered financial institutions market with BANC Mall, PALMS and
PortPro products
|
January 2002
|
|
Real-Time USA
|
|
$4,000,000
|
|
Expanded financial institutions offering with Lightning and
Real-Time products
|
November 2002
|
|
DBC
|
|
$4,500,000
|
|
Added municipal finance structuring products for underwriters,
investment banks, municipal issuers and financial advisors
|
December 2003
|
|
Amicorp Fund Services
|
|
$1,800,000
|
|
Entered offshore fund administration services market
|
January 2004
|
|
Investment Advisory Network
|
|
$3,000,000
|
|
Expanded wealth management capabilities with Compass and
Portfolio Manager products
|
February 2004
|
|
NeoVision Hypersystems
|
|
$1,600,000
|
|
Added data visualization dashboard capabilities with Heatmaps
product
|
April 2004
|
|
OMR Systems
|
|
$19,671,000
|
|
Added integrated, global product offering for financial
institutions and hedge funds with TradeThru product
|
February 2005
|
|
Achievement Technologies
|
|
$470,000
|
|
Enhanced real estate property management offering with SamTrak
facilities management product
|
February 2005
|
|
Eisnerfast
|
|
$25,300,000
|
|
Expanded fund administration services to the hedge fund and
private equity markets
|
April 2005
|
|
Financial Models Company
|
|
$159,000,000
|
|
Expanded front-, middle- and back-office products and services
to the investment management industry including Pacer, Pages,
Recon and Sylvan products
|
85
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acquisition
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
date
|
|
Acquired business
|
|
Contract purchase price*
|
|
Acquired capabilities, products and services
|
|
|
June 2005
|
|
Financial Interactive
|
|
358,424 shares and warrants to purchase 50,000 shares
|
|
Expanded alternative investment fund offerings with
FundRunner CRM product
|
August 2005
|
|
MarginMan
|
|
$5,600,000
|
|
Expanded depth in foreign currency exchange market with
MarginMan product
|
October 2005
|
|
Open Information Systems
|
|
$24,000,000
|
|
Entered money market, custody and security lending market with
Global Debt Manager, Information Manager and Money Market
Manager products
|
March 2006
|
|
Cogent Management
|
|
$12,250,000
|
|
Expanded fund administration services to hedge fund and private
equity markets
|
August 2006
|
|
Zoologic
|
|
$3,000,000
|
|
Added education and training courseware offerings for financial
institutions
|
March 2007
|
|
Northport
|
|
$5,000,000
|
|
Expanded fund administration services to private equity market
|
October 2008
|
|
Micro Design Services
|
|
$17,200,000
|
|
Added real-time, mission-critical order routing and execution
services with ACA and MarketLook products
|
March 2009
|
|
Evare
|
|
$3,514,500
|
|
Expanded institutional middle- and back-office outsourcing
services with financial data acquisition, transformation and
delivery services
|
May 2009
|
|
MAXIMIS
|
|
$7,700,000
|
|
Expanded institutional footprint and provided new cross-selling
opportunities
|
November 2009
|
|
TheNextRound
|
|
$21,000,000
|
|
Expanded private equity client base with TNR Solution product
|
December 2009
|
|
Tradeware
|
|
$22,500,000
|
|
Added electronic trading offering in broker/dealer market
|
February 2010
|
|
GIPS
|
|
$12,000,000
|
|
Expanded fund administration services to private equity market
|
October 2010
|
|
thinkorswim Technologies
|
|
$5,000,000
|
|
Added electronic OMS/EMS offering in broker/dealer market
|
December 2010
|
|
TimeShareWare
|
|
$30,500,000
|
|
Added shared ownership property management platform to real
estate offering
|
|
|
86
* Share references are to
shares of SS&C common stock after giving effect to
SS&Cs three-for-two common stock split in the form of
a stock dividend effective as of March 2004, but do not reflect
the capital structure of SS&C Holdings.
Products and
services
Our products and services allow professionals in the financial
services industry to automate complex business processes within
financial services providers and are instrumental in helping our
clients manage significant information processing requirements.
Our solutions enable our clients to focus on core operations,
better monitor and manage investment performance and risk,
improve operating efficiency and reduce operating costs. Our
portfolio of over 60 products and software-enabled services
allows our clients to automate and integrate front-office
functions such as trading and modeling, middle-office functions
such as portfolio management and reporting, and back-office
functions such as accounting, performance measurement,
reconciliation, reporting, processing and clearing.
87
The following chart summarizes our principal software products
and services, typical users and the vertical markets each
product serves. Most of these products are also used to deliver
our software-enabled services.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Products
|
|
|
Typical users
|
|
|
Vertical markets served
|
Portfolio Management/Accounting
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
AdvisorWare
|
|
|
Portfolio managers
|
|
|
Alternative investment managers
|
Altair
|
|
|
Asset managers
|
|
|
Financial markets
|
CAMRA
|
|
|
Fund administrators
|
|
|
Institutional asset managers
|
Debt & Derivatives
|
|
|
Investment advisors
|
|
|
Insurance & pension funds
|
FundRunner Marathon
|
|
|
Auditors
|
|
|
Treasury, banks & credit unions
|
Global Wealth Platform
|
|
|
Alternative investment managers
|
|
|
|
Lightning
|
|
|
Broker/dealers
|
|
|
|
MAXIMIS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pacer
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pages
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PALMS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PortPro
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recon
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sylvan
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TNR Solution
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Return
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trading/Treasury Operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Antares
|
|
|
Securities traders
|
|
|
Alternative investment managers
|
Antares Trader
|
|
|
Financial institutions
|
|
|
Financial markets
|
MarginMan
|
|
|
Asset managers
|
|
|
Treasury, banks & credit unions
|
MarketLook Information System
|
|
|
Brokers/dealers
|
|
|
Corporate treasuries
|
TradeDesk
|
|
|
Financial exchanges
|
|
|
|
TradeThru
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tradeware MarketCenter
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial Modeling
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
DBC
|
|
|
CEO/CFOs
|
|
|
Insurance & pension funds
|
PTS
|
|
|
Risk managers
|
|
|
Municipal finance groups
|
Risk Analytics
|
|
|
Actuarial professionals
|
|
|
Treasury, banks & credit unions
|
|
|
|
Bank asset/liability managers
|
|
|
Asset managers
|
|
|
|
Investment bankers
|
|
|
Hedge funds
|
|
|
|
State/local treasury staff
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial advisors
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
88
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Products
|
|
|
Typical users
|
|
|
Vertical markets served
|
Loan Management/Accounting
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BANC Mall
|
|
|
Mortgage originators
|
|
|
Commercial lenders
|
LMS Loan Suite
|
|
|
Commercial lenders
|
|
|
Insurance & pension funds
|
LMS Originator
|
|
|
Mortgage loan servicers
|
|
|
Treasury, banks & credit unions
|
LMS Servicer
|
|
|
Mortgage loan portfolio managers
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Real estate investment managers
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bank/credit union loan officers
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property Management
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CondotelWare
|
|
|
Real estate investment managers
|
|
|
Real estate leasing/property
|
SKYLINE
|
|
|
Real estate leasing agents
|
|
|
managers
|
TimeShareWare
|
|
|
Real estate property managers
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Facility managers
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Condo managers
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Time share resort managers
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Money Market Processing
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Information Manager
|
|
|
Financial Institutions
|
|
|
Treasury, banks & credit unions
|
Money Market Manager
|
|
|
Custodians
|
|
|
|
Global Debt Manager
|
|
|
Security lenders
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash managers
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Training
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Zoologic Learning Solutions
|
|
|
Financial institutions
|
|
|
All verticals
|
|
|
|
Asset managers
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hedge fund managers
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment bankers
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Services
|
|
|
Typical users
|
|
|
Vertical markets served
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Advanced Component
|
|
|
Portfolio managers
|
|
|
Alternative investment managers
|
Architecture
|
|
|
Asset managers
|
|
|
Financial markets
|
Custom Mobility
|
|
|
Financial exchanges
|
|
|
Institutional asset managers
|
Evare
|
|
|
Fund administrators
|
|
|
Insurance & pension funds
|
GlobalX
|
|
|
Investment advisors
|
|
|
Treasury, banks & credit unions
|
SS&C Direct
|
|
|
Alternative investment managers
|
|
|
|
SS&C Fund Services
|
|
|
Securities traders
|
|
|
|
SS&C PEI Solutions
|
|
|
Broker/dealers
|
|
|
|
SSCNet
|
|
|
Private equity
|
|
|
|
SVC
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tradeware FIXLink
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tradeware OATS Consolidator
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
89
Portfolio
management/accounting
Our products and services for portfolio management span most of
our vertical markets and offer our clients a wide range of
investment management solutions.
AdvisorWare. AdvisorWare software supports hedge
funds, funds of funds and family offices with sophisticated
global investment, trading and management concerns,
and/or
complex financial, tax (including German tax requirements),
partnership and allocation reporting requirements. It delivers
comprehensive multicurrency investment management, financial
reporting, performance fee calculations, net asset value
calculations, contact management and partnership accounting in a
straight-through processing environment.
Altair. Altair software is a portfolio management
system designed for companies that are looking for a solution
that meets Benelux market requirements and want client/server
architecture with SQL support. We license Altair primarily to
European asset managers, stock brokers, custodians, banks,
pension funds and insurance companies. Altair supports a full
range of financial instruments, including fixed income,
equities, real estate investments and alternative investment
vehicles.
CAMRA. CAMRA (Complete Asset Management, Reporting
and Accounting) software supports the integrated management of
asset portfolios by investment professionals operating across a
wide range of institutional investment entities. CAMRA is a
32-bit, multi-user, integrated solution tailored to support the
entire portfolio management function and includes features to
execute, account for and report on all typical securities
transactions.
We have designed CAMRA to account for all activities of the
investment operation and to continually update investment
information through the processing of
day-to-day
securities transactions. CAMRA maintains transactions and
holdings and stores the results of most accounting calculations
in its open, relational database, providing user-friendly,
flexible data access and supporting data warehousing.
CAMRA offers a broad range of integrated modules that can
support specific client requirements, such as TBA dollar rolls,
trading, compliance monitoring, net asset value calculations,
performance measurement, fee calculations and reporting.
Debt & Derivatives. Debt &
Derivatives is a comprehensive financial application software
package designed to process and analyze all activities relating
to derivative and debt portfolios, including pricing, valuation
and risk analysis, derivative processing, accounting, management
reporting and regulatory reporting. Debt & Derivatives
delivers real-time transaction processing to treasury and
investment professionals, including traders, operations staff,
accountants and auditors.
FundRunner Marathon. FundRunner Marathon
gives hedge fund managers the tools necessary for investor
communication and reporting.
Global Wealth Platform. A web-based service, Global
Wealth Platform combines our core asset management product
functions with an innovative, easy-to-use interface. Global
Wealth Platform provides an integrated suite with key
components modeling, trading, portfolio accounting,
client communications and other mission critical
workflows as an on-demand, software-enabled service.
Lightning. Lightning is a comprehensive software-enabled
service supporting the front-, middle- and back-office
processing needs of commercial banks and broker-dealers of all
sizes and
90
complexity. Lightning automates a number of processes, including
trading, sales, funding, accounting, risk analysis and
asset/liability management.
MAXIMIS. MAXIMIS is a real-time intranet-enabled
portfolio management solution for insurance companies, pension
funds and institutional asset managers. Its key product
functions include portfolio analysis, investment management,
trade processing, cash processing, multi-currency accounting,
regulatory reporting, operations and analysis and management
reporting.
Pacer. Pacer is a portfolio management and
accounting system designed to manage diversified global
portfolios and meet the unique management and accounting needs
of all business streams, from institutional and pension
management, to separately managed accounts, private client
portfolios, mutual funds and unit trusts.
Pages. Pages is a client communication system that
generates unique individual client statements and slide
presentations for print, electronic or
face-to-face
meetings. Pages helps enhance customer services by producing
client statements that automatically assemble data from
portfolio management, customer relationship management,
performance measurement and other investment systems.
PALMS. PALMS (Portfolio Asset Liability Management
System) is an Internet-based service for community banks and
credit unions that enables them to manage and analyze their
balance sheet. PALMS gives financial institutions instant access
to their balance sheet by importing data directly from general
ledger, loan, deposit and investment systems and can perform
simulations for detailed analysis of the data.
PortPro. PortPro delivers Internet-based portfolio
accounting and is available as a software-enabled service.
PortPro helps financial institutions effectively measure,
analyze and manage balance sheets and investment portfolios.
PortPro is offered as a stand-alone product or as a module of
Lightning. PortPro includes bond accounting and analytics.
Recon. Recon is a transaction, position and cash
reconciliation system that streamlines reconciliation by
identifying exceptions and providing effective workflow tools to
resolve issues faster, thereby reducing operational risk. Recon
automatically reconciles transactions, holdings and cash from
multiple sources.
Sylvan. Sylvan is a performance measurement,
attribution and composite management platform that is designed
to streamline the calculation and reporting of performance
measurement requirements.
TNR Solution. TNR Solution is a software product for
private equity, hedge funds, funds of hedge funds and family
offices. Built around Microsofts .NET platform, the
product gives end users the flexibility to manage all aspects of
their operations from contact management, fund raising,
investor relations, fund, portfolio and deal management, general
ledger and reporting.
Total Return. Total Return is a portfolio management
and partnership accounting system directed toward the hedge fund
and family office markets. It is a multi-currency system,
designed to provide financial and tax accounting and reporting
for businesses with high transaction volumes.
91
Trading/treasury
operations
Our comprehensive real-time trading systems offer a wide range
of trade order management solutions that support both buy-side
and sell-side trading. Our full-service trade processing system
delivers comprehensive processing for global treasury and
derivative operations. Solutions are available to clients either
through a license or as a software-enabled service.
Antares. Antares is a comprehensive, real-time,
event-driven trading and profit and loss reporting system
designed to integrate trade modeling with trade order
management. Antares enables clients to trade and report
fixed-income, equities, foreign exchange, futures, options,
repos and many other instruments across different asset classes.
Antares also offers an add-on option of integrating
Heatmaps data visualization technology to browse and
navigate holdings information.
Antares Trader. Antares Trader is an integrated
order and execution management system (OEMS) that enables
clients to integrate pre-trade compliance, real-time position
and profit and loss (P&L), what-if analysis,
reporting, and Financial Information eXchange (FIX)
connectivity. In addition, Antares Trader facilitates the
routing of trades to multiple brokers and execution venues and
provides direct market access for equities, futures and options
trading.
MarginMan. MarginMan delivers collateralized trading
software to the foreign exchange marketplace. MarginMan supports
collateralized foreign exchange trading, precious metals trading
and
over-the-counter
foreign exchange options trading.
MarketLook Information System (MLIS). MLIS allows
traders anywhere in the world access to market color and size
directly from traders on the trading floor of the New York Stock
Exchange.
TradeDesk. TradeDesk is a comprehensive paperless
trading system that automates front- and middle-office aspects
of fixed-income transaction processing. In particular, TradeDesk
enables clients to automate ticket entry, confirmation and
access to offerings and provides clients with immediate, online
access to complete client information and holdings.
TradeThru. TradeThru is a web-based treasury and
derivatives operations service that supports multiple asset
classes and provides multi-bank, multi-entity and multi-currency
integration of front-, middle- and back-office trade functions
for financial institutions. TradeThru is available either
through a license or as a software-enabled service. The system
delivers automated front- to back-office functions throughout
the lifecycle of a trade, from deal capture to settlement, risk
management, accounting and reporting. TradeThru also provides
data to other external systems, such as middle-office analytic
and risk management systems and general ledgers. TradeThru
provides one common instrument database, counterparty database,
audit trail and
end-of-day
runs.
Tradeware MarketCenter. Tradeware MarketCenter is an
order management solution for all aspects of global agency
trading process, from sending indications of interest
(IOIs) to managing order flow to providing back-office and
compliance reporting.
Financial
modeling
We offer several powerful analytical software and financial
modeling applications for the insurance industry. We also
provide analytical software and services to the municipal
finance groups market.
92
DBC Product Suite. We provide analytical software
and services to municipal finance groups. Our suite of DBC
products addresses a broad spectrum of municipal finance
concerns, including:
|
|
|
general bond structures,
|
|
|
revenue bonds,
|
|
|
housing bonds,
|
|
|
student loans, and
|
|
|
Federal Housing Administration insured revenue bonds
and securitizations.
|
Our DBC products also deliver solutions for debt structuring,
cash flow modeling and database management. Typical users of our
DBC products include investment banks, municipal issuers and
financial advisors for structuring new issues, securitizations,
strategic planning and asset/liability management.
PTS. PTS is a pricing and financial modeling tool
for life insurance companies. PTS provides an economic model of
insurance assets and liabilities, generating option-adjusted
cash flows to reflect the complex set of options and covenants
frequently encountered in insurance contracts or comparable
agreements.
Risk Analytics. Risk Analytics provides a
comprehensive view of risk across all asset classes for banks,
hedge funds, asset managers, insurance companies and pension
funds. Risk Analytics is designed for risk managers who need
better tracking, managing and reporting of value-at-risk and
ex-ante risk measures across all asset classes.
Loan
management/accounting
Our products that support loan administration activities are LMS
and BANC Mall.
BANC Mall. BANC Mall is an Internet-based lending
and leasing tool designed for loan officers and loan
administrators. BANC Mall provides, as a software-enabled
service, online lending, leasing and research tools that deliver
critical information for credit processing and loan
administration. Clients use BANC Mall on a
fee-for-service
basis to access more than a dozen data providers.
LMS Loan Suite. The LMS Loan Suite is a single
database application that provides comprehensive loan management
throughout the life cycle of a loan, from the initial request to
final disposition. We have structured the flexible design of the
LMS Loan Suite to meet the most complex needs of commercial
lenders and servicers worldwide. The LMS Loan Suite includes
both the LMS Originator and the LMS Servicer, facilitating
integrated loan portfolio processing.
LMS Originator. LMS Originator is a comprehensive
commercial loan origination system, designed to bring
efficiencies and controls to streamline the loan origination
process. LMS Originator tracks the origination of a loan from
the initial request through the initial funding. It enables
clients to set production goals, measure production volumes
against these goals and analyze the quality of loan requests
being submitted by third parties. LMS Originator is integrated
with LMS Servicer for seamless loan management processing
throughout the life cycle of a loan.
LMS Servicer. LMS Servicer is a comprehensive
commercial loan servicing system designed to support the
servicing of a wide variety of product types and complex loan
structures. LMS
93
Servicer provides capabilities in implementing complex investor
structures, efficient payment processing, escrow processing and
analysis, commercial mortgage-backed securities (CMBS) servicing
and reporting and portfolio analytics. LMS Servicer is
integrated with LMS Originator for seamless loan management
processing throughout the life cycle of a loan.
Property
management
CondotelWare. CondotelWare incorporates a Service
Oriented Architecture (SOA) and is designed to address the
special operational challenges of condominium hotels.
SKYLINE. SKYLINE is a comprehensive property
management system that integrates all aspects of real estate
property management, from prospect management to lease
administration, work order management, accounting and reporting.
By providing a single-source view of all real estate holdings,
SKYLINE functions as an integrated lease administration system,
a historical property/portfolio knowledge base and a robust
accounting and financial reporting system, enabling users to
track each property managed, including data on specific units
and tenants. Market segments served include:
|
|
|
|
|
|
commercial
|
|
retirement communities
|
|
|
|
residential
|
|
universities
|
|
|
|
retail
|
|
hospitals
|
TimeShareWare. TimeShareWare Enterprise incorporates
a Service Oriented Architecture (SOA) and provides the tools,
structure, and performance needed to accommodate management of
complex and demanding resort operations, including sales and
marketing, management, contract processing, loan servicing and
property management.
Money market
processing
Information Manager. Information Manager is a
comprehensive web-enabled solution for financial institutions
that delivers core business application functionality to
internal and external clients desktops. Information
Manager provides reporting, transaction entry, scheduling,
entitlement and work flow management and interfaces to
third-party applications. Information Manager supports
back-office systems, including custody, trust accounting,
security lending, cash management, collateral management and
global clearing.
Money Market Manager. Money Market Manager (M3) is a
web-enabled solution that is used by banks and broker-dealers
for the money market issuance services. M3 provides the
functionality required for issuing and acting as a paying agent
for money market debt instruments. M3 provides the reports
needed for clients to manage their business, including deals,
issues and payment accruals.
Global Debt Manager. Global Debt Manager is a robust
browser based application for corporate and municipal bond
accounting. Fully integrated with Money Market Manager (M3),
Global Debt Manager offers processing for conventional and
structured debt within a secure and flexible platform.
Training
Zoologic Learning Solutions. Zoologic Learning
Solutions is a suite of learning solutions that provides
in-depth, introductory and continuing education training at all
levels, offering
94
mix-and-match
courses easily configured into curriculums that meet our
clients needs. It includes instructor-led training,
web-based courseware and program design.
Services
Advanced Component Architecture (ACA). ACA is a
robust set of service capabilities to develop customized trading
and support solutions for exchanges, brokerages and financial
institutions. With the core technology components of ACA,
clients can significantly reduce the traditional system delivery
process.
Custom Mobility. Custom Mobility provides expertise
in designing and developing mobility solutions for the financial
markets. We believe that our understanding of the power of
mobile/wireless technology, coupled with a deep understanding of
the financial markets, has permitted us to offer services
tailored to this growing portion of the market.
Evare. Evare is a leader in financial data
acquisition, transformation and delivery services. Global
Managed Services connect you to your clients and counterparties
using each firms preferred method of connectivity, custom
data formats, and industry standards. All parties utilize their
existing systems and protocols without having to upgrade or
install software.
GlobalX. GlobalX is a trading solution providing
broker-dealers with a simplified, integrated cross-border trade
execution and settlement process. The GlobalX technology is
designed to provide clients with improved operational
efficiency, lower costs and a significantly higher percentage of
successful cross-border trades.
SS&C Direct. We provide comprehensive
software-enabled services through our SS&C Direct operating
unit for portfolio accounting, reporting and analysis functions.
Since 1997, SS&C Direct has offered ASP, business process
outsourcing (BPO) and blended outsourcing services to
institutional asset managers, insurance companies, hedge funds,
and financial institutions.
The SS&C Direct service includes:
|
|
|
full BPO investment accounting and investment operations
services,
|
|
hosting of a companys application software,
|
|
automated workflow integration,
|
|
automated quality control mechanisms, and
|
|
extensive interface and connectivity services to custodian
banks, data service providers, depositories and other external
entities.
|
SS&C Fund Services. We provide
comprehensive on- and offshore fund administration services to
hedge fund and other alternative investment managers using our
proprietary software products. SS&C Fund Services
offers fund manager services, transfer agency services, funds of
funds services, tax processing and accounting and processing.
SS&C Fund Services supports all fund types and
investment strategies. Market segments served include:
|
|
|
hedge fund managers
|
|
investment managers
|
funds of funds managers
|
|
commodity pool operators
|
commodity trading advisors
|
|
proprietary traders
|
family offices
|
|
private equity groups
|
private wealth groups
|
|
separate managed accounts
|
95
SS&C PEI Solutions. SS&C PEI Solutions
provides outsourced administration services and software
designed specifically for the private equity firms and the
partnerships they sponsor.
SSCNet. SSCNet is a global trade network linking
investment managers, broker-dealers, clearing agencies,
custodians and interested parties. SSCNets real-time trade
matching utility and delivery instruction database facilitate
integration of front-, middle- and back-office functions,
reducing operational risk and costs.
SVC. SVC is a single source for securities data that
consolidates data from leading global sources to provide clients
with the convenience of one customized data feed. SVC provides
clients with seamless, timely and accurate data for pricing,
corporate actions, dividends, interest payments, foreign
exchange rates and security master for global financial
instruments.
Tradeware FIXLink. Tradeware FIXLink is a FIX
network for IOIs, trades, orders, and allocations, providing a
reliable broker-neutral and platform-neutral FIX connectivity
service to broker-dealers and institutions.
Tradeware OATS Consolidator. Tradeware OATS
Consolidator is a broker-neutral compliance service that
provides an Order Audit Trail System, or OATS, reporting
solution for broker-dealers using multiple trading systems.
Software and
service delivery options
Our delivery methods include software-enabled services, software
licenses with related maintenance agreements, and blended
solutions. Substantially all of our software-enabled services
are built around and leverage our proprietary software.
Software-Enabled Services. We provide a broad range
of software-enabled services for our clients. By utilizing our
proprietary software and avoiding the substantial use of
third-party products to provide our software-enabled services,
we are able to greatly reduce potential operating risks,
efficiently tailor our products and services to meet specific
client needs, significantly improve overall service levels and
generate high overall operating margins and cash flow. Our
software-enabled services are generally provided under
non-cancelable contracts with initial terms of one to five years
that require monthly or quarterly payments and are subject to
automatic annual renewal at the end of the initial term unless
terminated by either party. Pricing on our software-enabled
services varies depending upon the complexity of the services
being provided, the number of users, assets under management and
transaction volume. Importantly, our software-enabled services
allow us to leverage our proprietary software and existing
infrastructure, thereby increasing our aggregate profits and
cash flows. For the nine months ended September 30, 2010,
revenues from software-enabled services represented 64.1% of
total revenues.
Software License and Related Maintenance
Agreements. We license our software to clients through
either perpetual or term licenses. In connection with these
contracts we provide maintenance. Maintenance contracts on our
core enterprise software products, which typically incorporate
annual pricing increases, provide us with a stable and
contractually recurring revenue base due to average revenue
retention rates of over 90% in each of the last five years. We
typically generate additional revenues as our existing clients
expand usage of our products. For the nine months ended
September 30, 2010, license and maintenance revenues
represented 7.3% and 22.3% of total revenues, respectively.
96
Blended Solutions. We provide certain clients with
targeted, blended solutions based on a combination of our
various software and software-enabled services. We believe that
this capability further differentiates us from many of our
competitors that are unable to provide this level of service.
Professional
services
We offer a range of professional services to assist clients.
Professional services consist of consulting and implementation
services, including the initial installation of systems,
conversion of historical data and ongoing training and support.
Our in-house consulting teams work closely with the client to
ensure the smooth transition and operation of our systems. Our
consulting teams have a broad range of experience in the
financial services industry and include certified public
accountants, chartered financial analysts, mathematicians and IT
professionals from the asset management, real estate,
investment, insurance, hedge fund, municipal finance and banking
industries. We believe our commitment to professional services
facilitates the adoption of our software products across our
target markets. For the nine months ended September 30,
2010, revenues from professional services represented 6.3% of
total revenues.
Product
support
We believe a close and active service and support relationship
is important to enhancing client satisfaction and furnishes an
important source of information regarding evolving client
issues. We provide our larger clients with a dedicated client
support team whose primary responsibility is to resolve
questions and provide solutions to address ongoing needs. Direct
telephone support is provided during extended business hours,
and additional hours are available during peak periods. We also
offer the SS&C Solution Center, a website that serves
as an exclusive online community for clients, where clients can
find answers to product questions, exchange information, share
best practices and comment on business issues. Approximately
every two weeks, we distribute via the Internet our software and
services eBriefings, which are industry-specific articles
in our eight vertical markets and in geographic regions around
the world. We supplement our service and support activities with
comprehensive training. Training options include regularly
hosted classroom and online instruction, e.Training, and
online client seminars, or webinars, that address
current, often technical, issues in the financial services
industry.
We periodically make maintenance releases of licensed software
available to our clients, as well as regulatory updates
(generally during the fourth quarter, on a when and if available
basis), to meet industry reporting obligations and other
processing requirements.
Clients
We have over 4,500 clients globally in eight vertical markets
within the financial services industry that require a full range
of information management and analysis, accounting, actuarial,
reporting and compliance software on a timely and flexible
basis. Our clients include multinational banks, retail banks and
credit unions, hedge funds, funds of funds and family offices,
institutional asset managers, insurance companies and pension
funds, municipal finance groups, brokers/dealers, financial
exchanges, commercial lenders, real estate lenders and property
managers. Our clients include many of the largest and most
well-recognized firms in the financial services industry. During
the nine months ended September 30, 2010, our top 10
97
clients represented approximately 16% of revenues, with no
single client accounting for more than 5% of revenues.
Sales and
marketing
We believe a direct sales organization is essential to the
successful implementation of our business strategy, given the
complexity and importance of the operations and information
managed by our products, the extensive regulatory and reporting
requirements of each industry, and the unique dynamics of each
vertical market. Our dedicated direct sales and support
personnel continually undergo extensive product and sales
training and are located in our various sales offices worldwide.
We also use telemarketing to support sales of our real estate
property management products and work through alliance partners
who sell our software-enabled services to their correspondent
banking clients.
Our marketing personnel have extensive experience in high tech
marketing to the financial services industry and are responsible
for identifying market trends, evaluating and developing
marketing opportunities, generating client leads and providing
sales support. Our marketing activities, which focus on the use
of the Internet as a cost-effective means of reaching current
and potential clients, include:
|
|
|
content-rich, periodic software and services eBriefings
targeted at clients and prospects in each of our vertical
and geographic markets,
|
|
regular product-focused webinars,
|
|
seminars and symposiums,
|
|
trade shows and conferences, and
|
|
e-marketing
campaigns.
|
Some of the benefits of our shift in focus to an Internet-based
marketing strategy include lower marketing costs, more direct
contacts with actual and potential clients, increased marketing
leads, distribution of more
up-to-date
marketing information and an improved ability to measure
marketing initiatives.
The marketing department also supports the sales force with
appropriate documentation or electronic materials for use during
the sales process.
Product
development and engineering
We believe we must introduce new products and offer product
innovation on a regular basis to maintain our competitive
advantage. To meet these goals, we use multidisciplinary teams
of highly trained personnel and leverage this expertise across
all product lines. We have invested heavily in developing a
comprehensive product analysis process to ensure a high degree
of product functionality and quality. Maintaining and improving
the integrity, quality and functionality of existing products is
the responsibility of individual product managers. Product
engineering management efforts focus on enterprise-wide
strategies, implementing best-practice technology regimens,
maximizing resources and mapping out an integration plan for our
entire umbrella of products as well as third-party products. Our
research and development expenses for the years ended
December 31, 2007, 2008 and 2009 and for the nine months
ended September 30, 2010 were $26.3 million,
$26.8 million, $26.5 million and $23.5 million,
respectively. In addition, we have made significant investments
in intellectual property through our acquisitions.
98
Our research and development engineers work closely with our
marketing and support personnel to ensure that product evolution
reflects developments in the marketplace and trends in client
requirements. We have generally issued a major release of our
core products during the second or third quarter of each fiscal
year, which includes both functional and technical enhancements.
We also provide an annual release in the fourth quarter to
reflect evolving regulatory changes in time to meet
clients year-end reporting requirements.
Competition
The market for financial services software and services is
competitive, rapidly evolving and highly sensitive to new
product introductions and marketing efforts by industry
participants, although high conversion costs can create barriers
to adoption of new products or technologies. The market is
fragmented and served by both large-scale players with broad
offerings as well as firms that target only local markets or
specific types of clients. We also face competition from
information systems developed and serviced internally by the IT
departments of large financial services firms. We believe that
we generally compete effectively as to the factors identified
for each market below, although some of our existing competitors
and potential competitors have substantially greater financial,
technical, distribution and marketing resources than we have and
may offer products with different functions or features that are
more attractive to potential customers than our offerings.
Alternative Investments: In our alternative
investments market, we compete with multiple vendors that may be
categorized into two groups, one group consisting of independent
specialized administration providers, which are generally
smaller than us, and the other including prime brokerage firms
offering fund administration services. Major competitors in this
market include CITCO Group, State Street Bank and Citi
Alternative Investment Services. The key competitive factors in
marketing software and services to the alternative investment
industry are the need for independent fund administration,
features and adaptability of the software, level and quality of
customer support, level of software development expertise and
total cost of ownership. Our strengths in this market are our
expertise, our independence, our ability to deliver
functionality by multiple methods and our technology, including
the ownership of our own software. Although no company is
dominant in this market, we face many competitors, some of which
have greater financial resources and distribution facilities
than we do.
Asset Management: In our asset management market, we
compete with a variety of other vendors depending on client
characteristics such as size, type, location, computing
environment and functionality requirements. Competitors in this
market range from larger providers of integrated portfolio
management systems and outsourcing services, such as SunGard,
BNY Mellon Financial (Eagle Investment Systems) and Advent
Software, to smaller providers of specialized applications and
technologies such as StatPro, Charles River Development and
others. We also compete with internal processing and information
technology departments of our clients and prospective clients.
The key competitive factors in marketing asset management
solutions are the reliability, accuracy, timeliness and
reporting of processed information to internal and external
customers, features and adaptability of the software, level and
quality of customer support, level of software development
expertise and return on investment. Our strengths in this market
are our technology, our ability to deliver functionality by
multiple delivery methods and our ability to provide
cost-effective solutions for clients. Although no company is
dominant in this market, we face many competitors, some of which
have greater financial resources and distribution facilities
than we do.
99
Insurance and Pension Funds: In our insurance and
pension funds market, we compete with a variety of vendors
depending on clients characteristics such as size, type,
location, computing environment and functionality requirements.
Competitors in this market range from large providers of
portfolio management systems, such as State Street Bank
(Princeton Financial Systems) and SunGard, to smaller providers
of specialized applications and services.
We also compete with outsourcers, as well as the internal
processing and information technology departments of our clients
and prospective clients. The key competitive factors in
marketing insurance and pension plan systems are the accuracy,
timeliness and reporting of processed information provided to
internal and external clients, features and adaptability of the
software, level and quality of customer support, economies of
scale and return on investment. Our strengths in this market are
our years of experience, our top-tier clients, our ability to
provide solutions by multiple delivery methods, our
cost-effective and customizable solutions and our expertise. We
believe that we have a strong competitive position in this
market.
Real Estate Property Management: In our real estate
property management market, we compete with numerous software
vendors consisting of smaller specialized real estate property
management solution providers and larger property management
software vendors with more dedicated resources than our real
estate property management business, such as Yardi Systems. The
key competitive factors in marketing property management systems
are the features and adaptability of the software, level of
quality and customer support, degree of responsiveness and
overall net cost. Our strengths in this market are the quality
of our software and our reputation with our clients. This is a
very fragmented market with many competitors.
Treasury, Banks & Credit Unions: In our
treasury, banks & credit unions market, there are multiple
software and services vendors that are either smaller providers
of specialized applications and technologies or larger providers
of enterprise systems, such as SunGard and Misys. We also
compete with outsourcers as well as the internal processing and
information technology departments of our clients and
prospective clients. The key competitive factors in marketing
financial institution software and services include accuracy and
timeliness of processed information provided to clients,
features and adaptability of the software, level and quality of
customer support, level of software development expertise, total
cost of ownership and return on investment. Our strengths in
this market are our flexible technology platform and our ability
to provide integrated solutions for our clients. In this market
we face many competitors, some of which have greater financial
resources and distribution facilities than we do.
Commercial Lending: In our commercial lending
market, we compete with a variety of other vendors depending on
client characteristics such as size, type, location and
functional requirements. Competitors in this market range from
large competitors whose principal businesses are not in the loan
management business, such as PNC Financial Services (Midland
Loan Services), to smaller providers of specialized applications
and technologies. The key competitive factors in marketing
commercial lending solutions are the accuracy, timeliness and
reporting of processed information provided to customers, level
of software development expertise, level and quality of customer
support and features and adaptability of the software. Our
strength in this market is our ability to provide both broadly
diversified and customizable solutions to our clients. In this
market we face many competitors, some of which have greater
financial resources and distribution facilities than we do.
Financial Markets: In our financial markets, our
competition falls into two categoriesthe internal
development organizations within financial enterprises and
specialized financial
100
technology vendors, such as SunGard, Fidessa and Cinnober. The
key competitive factors in marketing financial markets
technology solutions are a proven track record of delivering
high quality solutions, level of responsiveness and overall net
cost. Our strengths in this market are a successful track record
of delivering solutions and our reputation with our clients.
This is an extremely competitive environment which requires
developing a strong customer relationship where we are viewed
more as a partner than a vendor.
Proprietary
rights
We rely on a combination of trade secret, copyright, trademark
and patent law, nondisclosure agreements and technical measures
to protect our proprietary technology. We have registered
trademarks for many of our products and will continue to
evaluate the registration of additional trademarks as
appropriate. We generally enter into confidentiality
and/or
license agreements with our employees, distributors, clients and
potential clients. We seek to protect our software,
documentation and other written materials under trade secret and
copyright laws, which afford limited protection. These efforts
may be insufficient to prevent third parties from asserting
intellectual property rights in our technology. Furthermore, it
may be possible for unauthorized third parties to copy portions
of our products or to reverse engineer or otherwise obtain and
use proprietary information, and third parties may assert
ownership rights in our proprietary technology. For additional
risks relating to our proprietary technology, please see
Risk factorsRisks relating to our businessIf
we are unable to protect our proprietary technology, our success
and our ability to compete will be subject to various risks,
such as third-party infringement claims, unauthorized use of our
technology, disclosure of our proprietary information or
inability to license technology from third parties.
Rapid technological change characterizes the software
development industry. We believe factors such as the
technological and creative skills of our personnel, new product
developments, frequent product enhancements, name recognition
and reliable service and support are more important to
establishing and maintaining a leadership position than legal
protections of our technology.
Employees
As of December 31, 2010, we had 1,399 full-time
employees, consisting of:
|
|
|
242 employees in research and development,
|
|
826 employees in consulting and services,
|
|
90 employees in sales and marketing,
|
|
127 employees in client support, and
|
|
114 employees in finance and administration.
|
As of December 31, 2010, 365 of our employees were in our
international operations. No employee is covered by any
collective bargaining agreement. We believe that we have a good
relationship with our employees.
Properties
We lease our corporate offices, which consist of
73,000 square feet of office space located in 80 Lamberton
Road, Windsor, CT 06095. In 2006, we extended the lease term
through October
101
2016. Additionally, we utilize facilities and offices in
eighteen other locations in the United States and have offices
in Toronto, Canada; Montreal, Canada; London, England; Dublin,
Ireland; Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia;
Tokyo, Japan; Singapore; Curacao, the Netherlands Antilles; and
Sydney, Australia. We believe that our facilities are in good
condition and generally suitable to meet our needs for the
foreseeable future; however, we will continue to seek additional
space as needed to satisfy our growth.
Legal
proceedings
From time to time, we are subject to certain legal proceedings
and claims that arise in the normal course of business. In the
opinion of our management, we are not involved in any litigation
or proceedings with third parties that our management believes
could have a material adverse effect on us or our business.
102
Management
Executive
officers and directors
The following table sets forth information regarding our
executive officers and directors, including their ages as of
December 31, 2010:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name
|
|
Age
|
|
Position
|
|
|
William C. Stone
|
|
|
55
|
|
|
Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer
|
Normand A. Boulanger
|
|
|
48
|
|
|
President, Chief Operating Officer and Director
|
Patrick J. Pedonti
|
|
|
59
|
|
|
Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
|
Stephen V.R. Whitman
|
|
|
63
|
|
|
Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary
|
Campbell (Cam) R.
Dyer(1)
|
|
|
37
|
|
|
Director
|
William A.
Etherington(1)(2)
|
|
|
69
|
|
|
Director
|
Allan M.
Holt(2)(3)
|
|
|
58
|
|
|
Director
|
Claudius (Bud) E. Watts
IV(2)(3)
|
|
|
49
|
|
|
Director
|
Jonathan E.
Michael(1)
|
|
|
56
|
|
|
Director
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
Member of our Audit Committee.
|
|
(2)
|
|
Member of our Compensation
Committee.
|
|
(3)
|
|
Member of our Nominating Committee.
|
William C. Stone founded SS&C in 1986 and has served
as Chairman of the Board of Directors and Chief Executive
Officer since our inception. He also has served as our President
from inception through April 1997 and again from March 1999
until October 2004. Prior to founding SS&C, Mr. Stone
directed the financial services consulting practice of KPMG LLP,
an accounting firm, in Hartford, Connecticut and was Vice
President of Administration and Special Investment Services at
Advest, Inc., a financial services company. He also serves on
the board of directors of OpenLink Financial, Inc.
Normand A. Boulanger has served as our President and
Chief Operating Officer since October 2004. Prior to that,
Mr. Boulanger served as our Executive Vice President and
Chief Operating Officer from October 2001 to October 2004,
Senior Vice President, SS&C Direct from March 2000 to
September 2001, Vice President, SS&C Direct from April 1999
to February 2000, Vice President of Professional Services for
the Americas, from July 1996 to April 1999, and Director of
Consulting from March 1994 to July 1996. Prior to joining
SS&C, Mr. Boulanger served as Manager of Investment
Accounting for The Travelers from September 1986 to March 1994.
Mr. Boulanger was elected as one of our directors in
February 2006.
Patrick J. Pedonti has served as our Senior Vice
President and Chief Financial Officer since August 2002. Prior
to that, Mr. Pedonti served as our Vice President and
Treasurer from May 1999 to August 2002. Prior to joining
SS&C, Mr. Pedonti served as Vice President and Chief
Financial Officer for Accent Color Sciences, Inc., a company
specializing in high-speed color printing, from January 1997 to
May 1999.
Stephen V.R. Whitman has served as our Senior Vice
President, General Counsel and Secretary since June 2002. Prior
to joining SS&C, Mr. Whitman served as an attorney for
PA Consulting Group, an international management consulting
company headquartered in the United Kingdom, from November
2000 to December 2001. Prior to that, Mr. Whitman served as
103
Senior Vice President and General Counsel of Hagler Bailly,
Inc., a publicly traded international consulting company to the
energy and network industries, from October 1998 to October 2000
and as Vice President and General Counsel from July 1997 to
October 1998.
Campbell (Cam) R. Dyer was elected as one of our
directors in May 2008. He currently serves as a Principal in the
Technology Buyout Group of The Carlyle Group, which he joined in
2002. Prior to joining Carlyle, Mr. Dyer was an associate
with the private equity firm William Blair Capital Partners (now
Chicago Growth Partners), a consultant with Bain &
Company and an investment banking analyst in the M&A Group
of Bowles Hollowell Conner & Co. He also serves on the
boards of directors of CommScope, Inc., Open Solutions Inc. and
OpenLink Financial, Inc.
William A. Etherington was elected as one of our
directors in May 2006. Mr. Etherington retired - after a
38-year
career - from IBM in September 2001 as Senior Vice
President and Group Executive, Sales and Distribution and a
member of the Operations Committee and the Worldwide Management
Council. As a corporate director, he currently serves on the
boards of directors of Celestica Inc., Nordion Inc. and Onex
Corporation, and is the retired non-executive Chairman of the
Board of the Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce (CIBC).
Mr. Etherington served on the board of directors of CIBC
from 1994 to 2009.
Allan M. Holt was elected as one of our directors in
February 2006. He currently serves as a Managing Director and
Head of the U.S. Buyout Group of The Carlyle Group, which
he joined in 1991. He previously was head of Carlyles
Global Aerospace, Defense, Technology and Business/Government
Services group. Prior to joining Carlyle, Mr. Holt spent
three and a half years with Avenir Group, Inc., an investment
and advisory group. From 1984 to 1987, Mr. Holt was
Director of Planning and Budgets at MCI Communications
Corporation. Mr. Holt served on the board of directors of
Aviall, Inc. from 2001 to 2006 and the supervisory board of The
Nielsen Company B.V. from 2006 to 2008. He currently serves on
the boards of directors of Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corp.,
Fairchild Imaging, Inc., HCR ManorCare, Inc., HD Supply, Inc.,
NBTY, Inc. and Sequa Corp.
Claudius (Bud) E. Watts IV was elected as one of our
directors in November 2005. He currently serves as a Managing
Director and Head of the Technology Buyout Group of The Carlyle
Group. Prior to joining Carlyle in 2000, Mr. Watts was a
Managing Director in the M&A group of First Union
Securities, Inc. He joined First Union Securities when First
Union acquired Bowles Hollowell Conner & Co., where
Mr. Watts was a principal. He also serves on the boards of
directors of CommScope, Inc., CPU Technology, Freescale
Semiconductor, OpenLink Financial, Inc. and Open Solutions Inc.
Jonathan E. Michael was elected as one of our directors
in April 2010. He currently serves as President and Chief
Executive Officer of RLI Corp., a publicly traded specialty
insurance company, which he joined in 1982. Mr. Michael has
held various positions at RLI Corp., including President and
Chief Operating Officer, Executive Vice President and Chief
Financial Officer. Prior to joining RLI Corp., Mr. Michael
was associated with Coopers & Lybrand. Mr. Michael
served on the board of directors of Fieldstone Investment
Corporation from 2003 to 2007. He currently serves on the board
of directors of RLI Corp. and Maui Jim, Inc.
Board of
directors
Our business and affairs are managed under the direction of our
board of directors. We currently have seven directors. Our
directors hold office until their successors have been elected
and qualified or until the earlier of their resignation or
removal.
104
Our board of directors is divided into three classes with
members of each class of directors serving for staggered
three-year terms: two Class I directors
(Messrs. Boulanger and Dyer), two Class II directors
(Mr. Etherington and Mr. Michael) and three
Class III directors (Messrs. Holt, Stone and Watts),
whose initial terms will expire at the annual meetings of
stockholders held in 2011, 2012 and 2013, respectively. Our
classified board could have the effect of making it more
difficult for a third party to acquire control of us.
Our certificate of incorporation provides that the authorized
number of directors may be changed only by resolution of the
board of directors. Any additional directorships resulting from
an increase in the number of directors will be distributed
between the three classes so that, as nearly as possible, each
class will consist of one-third of the directors. This
classification of the board of directors may have the effect of
delaying or preventing changes in our control or management.
Our certificate of incorporation and bylaws provide that our
directors may be removed only for cause by the affirmative vote
of the holders of at least two-thirds of the votes that all our
stockholders would be entitled to cast in an annual election of
directors; provided that for so long as any of our stockholders
has a contractual right with us to designate a director to the
board of directors, our directors may be removed, with or
without cause, by the holders that have the right to remove such
director by the affirmative vote of at least a majority of the
votes that all such holders would be entitled to cast in an
annual election of directors. In addition, any vacancy in the
board of directors will be filled by the vote of a majority of
our directors then in office and not by our stockholders;
provided that for so long as any of our stockholders has a
contractual right with us to designate a director to the board
of directors, any specified vacancy shall be filled by the
holders that have the right to remove such director by the
affirmative vote of at least a majority of the votes that all
such holders would be entitled to cast in an annual election of
directors. Upon the expiration of the term of a class of
directors, directors in that class will be eligible to be
elected for a new three-year term at the annual meeting of
stockholders in the year in which their term expires.
All of our board members other than Messrs. Stone and
Boulanger are considered to be independent members
of the board under applicable rules of the NASDAQ Stock Market.
Messrs. Etherington and Michael are considered to be
independent members of the audit committee, and
Mr. Dyer is not, under applicable NASDAQ and Securities and
Exchange Commission rules. We intend to appoint an additional
director by March 31, 2011 who will be considered an
independent member of the audit committee under
applicable NASDAQ and Securities and Exchange Commission rules.
As our founder and chief executive officer, as well as a
principal stockholder, Mr. Stone provides a critical
contribution to the board of directors reflecting his detailed
knowledge of our company, our employees, our client base, our
prospects, the strategic marketplace, and our competitors.
Mr. Boulanger, as the other management representative,
provides significant knowledge regarding our operations,
employees, targeted markets, strategic initiatives, and
competitors.
Messrs. Dyer, Holt and Watts are elected to the board of
directors pursuant to our stockholders agreement with Carlyle
and, in addition to representing Carlyle as our principal
outside stockholder, bring extensive experience regarding the
management of public and private companies, and the financial
services industry.
Mr. Etherington brings experience as a board and committee
member of public companies, a detailed understanding of the
computer and information services industry, which is directly
105
relevant to our business, and expertise in the management of
complex technology organizations. Mr. Michael has extensive
experience in the financial services industry, including
companies that we seek to target as clients, as well as
extensive operational experience as a director and officer of
financial services and insurance companies.
Our board believes that these qualifications bring a broad set
of complementary experience, coupled with a strong alignment
with the interest of other stockholders, to the boards
discharge of its responsibilities.
We have no formal policy regarding board diversity. Our priority
in selection of board members is identification of members who
will further the interests of our stockholders through their
management experience, knowledge of our business, understanding
of the competitive landscape, and familiarity with our targeted
markets.
Board
committees
Our board of directors directs the management of our business
and affairs, as provided by Delaware law, and conducts its
business through meetings of the board of directors and three
standing committees: the audit committee, the compensation
committee and the nominating committee. In addition, from time
to time, special committees may be established under the
direction of the board of directors when necessary to address
specific issues.
Audit Committee. Messrs. Dyer, Etherington and
Michael currently serve on the audit committee. Our board has
determined that each of the members of its audit committee is an
audit committee financial expert as that term is
defined under the rules and regulations of the Securities and
Exchange Commission. The audit committees responsibilities
include:
|
|
|
appointing, approving the compensation of, and assessing the
independence of our independent registered public accounting
firm;
|
|
|
overseeing the work of our independent registered public
accounting firm, including through the receipt and consideration
of reports from our independent registered public accounting
firm;
|
|
|
reviewing and discussing with management and our independent
registered public accounting firm our annual and quarterly
financial statements and related disclosures;
|
|
|
coordinating our board of directors oversight of internal
control over financial reporting, disclosure controls and
procedures and our code of business conduct and ethics;
|
|
|
establishing procedures for the receipt and retention of
accounting related complaints and concerns;
|
|
|
approving any related person transactions; and
|
|
|
preparing the audit committee report required by the rules of
the Securities and Exchange Commission.
|
Compensation Committee. Messrs. Etherington,
Holt and Watts currently serve on our compensation committee.
Our compensation committees responsibilities include:
|
|
|
reviewing and approving, or making recommendations to our board
of directors with respect to, the compensation of our chief
executive officer and our other executive officers;
|
106
|
|
|
overseeing and administering our cash and equity incentive plans;
|
|
|
reviewing and making recommendations to our board with respect
to director compensation; and
|
|
|
preparing the compensation committee report required by
Securities and Exchange Commission rules.
|
Nominating Committee. Messrs. Holt and Watts
currently serve on our nominating committee. Our nominating
committees responsibilities include:
|
|
|
identifying individuals qualified to become members of our board
of directors; and
|
|
|
recommending to our board of directors the persons to be
nominated for election as directors and to each of the
boards committees.
|
Board leadership
structure and risk oversight
Mr. Stone has served as Chairman of the Board of Directors
and Chief Executive Officer since our inception in 1986. This
board leadership structure is commonly utilized by public
companies in the United States, and we believe that this
leadership structure has been effective for us. Having one
person serve as both chief executive officer and chairman of the
board shows our employees, customers and other constituencies
that we are under strong leadership, with a single person
setting the tone and having primary responsibility for managing
our operations. We also believe that this eliminates the
potential for duplication of efforts and inconsistent actions.
Pursuant to the terms of a stockholders agreement among
Mr. Stone, Carlyle and us, Mr. Stone has the right to
occupy one board seat and has the right to designate one of the
remaining board members, while the stockholders affiliated with
Carlyle have the right to designate four of the remaining board
members. Mr. Stone and the stockholders affiliated with
Carlyle collectively have the right to designate the remaining
board member. See Certain relationships and related
transactionsStockholders agreement. We recognize
that different board leadership structures may be appropriate
for companies with different histories or varying equity
ownership structures and percentages. However, we believe our
current leadership structure remains the optimal board
leadership structure for us.
Our audit committee is responsible for overseeing our risk
management function. While the audit committee has primary
responsibility for overseeing risk management, our entire board
of directors is actively involved in overseeing our risk
management. For example, the board engages in periodic
discussions with such company officers as the board deems
necessary, including the chief executive officer, chief
operating officer, chief financial officer and general counsel.
We believe that the leadership structure of our board supports
effective risk management oversight.
Code of business
conduct and ethics
We have adopted a written code of ethics, referred to as the
SS&C Code of Business Conduct and Ethics, which is
applicable to all directors, officers and employees and includes
provisions relating to accounting and financial matters. The
SS&C Code of Business Conduct and Ethics is available on
our website at www.ssctech.com. If we make any substantive
amendments to, or grant any waivers from, the code of ethics for
any director or officer, we will disclose the nature of such
amendment or waiver on our website or in a current report on
Form 8-K.
107
Compensation
committee interlocks and insider participation
Messrs. Etherington, Holt and Watts served on our
compensation committee during 2010. No member of the
compensation committee is or has been a former or current
officer or employee of SS&C Holdings or had any related
person transaction involving SS&C Holdings. None of our
executive officers served as a director or a member of a
compensation committee (or other committee serving an equivalent
function) of any other entity, one of whose executive officers
served as a director or member of our compensation committee
during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2010.
Compensation
discussion and analysis
On November 23, 2005, SS&C Holdings acquired SS&C
through the merger of Sunshine Merger Corporation, a wholly
owned subsidiary of SS&C Holdings, with and into SS&C,
with SS&C being the surviving company and a wholly owned
subsidiary of SS&C Holdings. As discussed below, various
aspects of our executive officer compensation were negotiated
and determined in connection with this transaction.
Our executive compensation program is overseen and administered
by our compensation committee, which currently consists of
Messrs. Etherington, Holt and Watts, who are appointed by
or affiliated with Carlyle, our majority stockholder. Our
compensation committee operates under a written charter adopted
by our board of directors and discharges the responsibilities of
the board relating to the compensation of our executive
officers, who consist of Messrs. Stone, Boulanger, Pedonti and
Whitman, and whom we refer to as our named executive officers.
Our chief executive officer is actively involved in setting
executive compensation and typically presents salary, bonus and
equity compensation recommendations to the compensation
committee, which, in turn, considers the recommendations and has
ultimate approval authority.
Objectives of our
executive compensation program
The primary objectives of the compensation committee with
respect to executive compensation are to:
|
|
|
attract, retain and motivate the best possible executive talent;
|
|
|
reward successful performance by the named executive officers
and the company; and
|
|
|
align the interests of the named executive officers with those
of our stockholders by providing long-term equity compensation.
|
To achieve these objectives, the compensation committee
evaluates our executive compensation program with the goal of
setting compensation at levels the committee believes are
competitive with those of other companies in our industry and in
our region that compete with us for executive talent. We have
not, however, retained a compensation consultant to review our
policies and procedures relating to executive compensation, and
we have not formally benchmarked our compensation against that
of other companies. Our compensation program rewards our named
executive officers based on a number of factors, including the
companys operating results, the companys performance
against budget, individual performance, prior-period
compensation and prospects for individual growth. Changes in
compensation are generally incremental in nature without wide
variations from year to year but with a general
108
trend that has matched increasing compensation with the growth
of our business. Many of the factors that affect compensation
are subjective in nature and not tied to peer group analyses,
surveys of compensation consultants or other statistical
criteria.
Each year our chief executive officer makes recommendations to
the compensation committee regarding compensation packages,
including his own. In making these recommendations, our chief
executive officer attempts to structure a compensation package
based on his years of experience in the financial services and
software industries and knowledge of what keeps people motivated
and committed to the institution. He prepares a written
description for the members of the compensation committee of the
performance during the year of each named executive officer,
including himself, discussing both positive and negative aspects
of performance and recommending salary and bonus amounts for
each named executive officer. Our chief executive officer
believes the named executive officers should receive a certain
portion of our total bonus pool based upon their
responsibilities and contributions. Further, our chief executive
officer considers the bonuses of the named executive officers in
comparison with our other officers and managers. As it relates
to the compensation of named executive officers other than our
chief executive officer, our compensation committee relies
heavily on our chief executive officers recommendations
and discusses his reviews and recommendations with him as part
of its deliberations. As it relates to our chief executive
officers compensation, the compensation committee
considers our chief executive officers recommendations. In
this as in other compensation matters, the compensation
committee exercises its independent judgment. After due
consideration, the compensation committee accepted the chief
executive officers recommendations for 2010 executive
officer compensation.
Components of our
executive compensation program
The primary elements of our executive compensation program are:
|
|
|
base salary;
|
|
|
discretionary annual cash bonuses;
|
|
|
stock option awards;
|
|
|
perquisites; and
|
|
|
severance and
change-of-control
benefits.
|
We have no formal or informal policy or target for allocating
compensation between long-term and short-term compensation,
between cash and non-cash compensation or among the different
forms of non-cash compensation. Instead, the compensation
committee, in consultation with and upon the recommendation of
our chief executive officer, determines subjectively what it
believes to be the appropriate level and mix of the various
compensation components. While we identify below particular
compensation objectives that each element of executive
compensation serves, we believe that each element of
compensation, to a greater or lesser extent, serves each of the
objectives of our executive compensation program.
Base
salary
Base salary is used to recognize the experience, skills,
knowledge and responsibilities required of all our employees,
including our named executive officers. When establishing base
salaries for 2010, the compensation committee, together with our
chief executive officer, considered a
109
variety of factors, including the seniority of the individual,
the level of the individuals responsibility, the ability
to replace the individual, the individuals tenure at the
company, relative pay among the named executive officers and the
dollar amount that would be necessary to keep the executive in
the Windsor, Connecticut area. Generally, we believe that
executive base salaries should grow incrementally over time and
that more of the up side of compensation should rest
with cash bonuses and long-term equity incentive compensation.
In the case of Mr. Stone, the minimum base salary is
mandated by his employment agreement and cannot be less than
$750,000 per year.
Base salaries are reviewed at least annually by our compensation
committee, and are adjusted from time to time to realign
salaries with market levels after taking into account company
performance and individual responsibilities, performance and
experience. No adjustments were made to the base salaries of our
named executive officers for fiscal year 2010, as Mr. Stone
determined, and the compensation committee concurred, that the
base salaries in effect for fiscal year 2009 were sufficient to
achieve our compensation objectives for base salary. As a
result, the base salaries for our named executive officers in
2010 were as follows: Mr. Stone, $750,000;
Mr. Boulanger, $450,000; Mr. Pedonti, $260,000; and
Mr. Whitman, $225,000.
Discretionary
annual cash bonus
Annual cash bonuses to named executive officers and other
employees are discretionary. Annual cash bonuses are generally
provided to employees regardless of whether we meet, exceed or
fail to meet our budgeted results, but the amount available for
bonuses to all employees, including the named executive
officers, will depend upon our financial results. The annual
cash bonuses are intended to compensate for strategic,
operational and financial successes of the company as a whole,
as well as individual performance and growth potential. The
annual cash bonuses are discretionary and not tied to the
achievement of specific results or pre-established financial
metrics or performance goals. No formula exists for determining
the amount of bonuses for employees or named executive officers.
Our chief executive officer proposes annual executive bonus
allocations, including his own proposed bonus, to the
compensation committee in February of each year. The
compensation committee, which has ultimate approval authority,
considers our chief executive officers recommendations and
makes a final decision with respect to annual bonuses. In making
recommendations to the compensation committee about bonuses for
named executive officers, our chief executive officer, after
taking into account the positive or negative impact of events
outside the control of management or an individual executive,
makes a subjective judgment of an individuals performance,
in the context of a number of factors, including the overall
economy and our financial performance, revenues and financial
position going into the new fiscal year. In making his
recommendations for annual bonuses in past years, Mr. Stone
has considered, among other things, an executives
(including his own) work in managing the business, establishing
internal controls, mentoring staff, completing and integrating
acquisitions, reducing costs, responding to market conditions
and maintaining our profitability. Mr. Stone is entitled to
a minimum annual bonus of at least $500,000 pursuant to his
employment agreement.
As our financial results for the year ended December 31,
2010 have not yet been finalized, our chief executive officer
has not yet determined the amount available for bonuses to all
employees, including our named executive officers, or his
proposed 2010 bonus allocations for our named executive
officers. We expect that Mr. Stone will propose the 2010
bonus allocations,
110
if any, for our named executive officers to the compensation
committee in February 2011 and that these bonuses will be paid
in March 2011. The following discussion illustrates how the 2009
bonuses for our named executive officers were determined.
Our chief executive officer proposed 2009 executive bonus
allocations, including his own proposed bonus, to the
compensation committee in February 2010. The compensation
committee considered our chief executive officers
recommendations and made a final decision with respect to 2009
bonuses.
Mr. Stones $1,750,000 bonus for 2009 was recommended
by Mr. Stone and approved, after due consideration, by the
compensation committee. The committees approval of
Mr. Stones bonus took into account our profitability
during challenging economic times, his deep involvement with our
acquisitions in 2009, each of which has performed well, and his
successful recruitment of several new managers.
Mr. Boulangers $800,000 bonus for 2009 was
recommended by Mr. Stone and approved, after due
consideration, by the compensation committee. The
committees approval of Mr. Boulangers bonus
took into account his responsibility for our
day-to-day
business operations across the organization, his critical
contributions in 2009 to enhancing corporate financial results,
reduction in overall debt levels and strong client satisfaction,
and his increased role in our hiring, acquisitions and
international operations.
Mr. Pedontis $340,000 bonus for 2009 was recommended
by Mr. Stone and approved, after due consideration, by the
compensation committee. The committees approval of
Mr. Pedontis bonus took into account his solid
management skills, his expanded role in personnel, public
relations and investor relations matters, and his support in the
implementation and integration of acquisitions, as well as his
responsibility for maintaining our internal controls.
Mr. Whitmans $225,000 bonus for 2009 was recommended
by Mr. Stone and approved, after due consideration, by the
compensation committee. The committees approval of
Mr. Whitmans bonus took into account his overall
management of the legal department and responsibility for
adherence to the internal budget, his instrumental role in
directing the legal work for our acquisitions and his intellect,
knowledge and work ethic.
These decisions reflect the fact that our compensation committee
does not fix a target bonus for the succeeding year, but rather,
as noted above, draws on subjective factors, and individual
performance evaluations, in arriving at its bonus decisions.
The amount of money available for the employee bonus pool is
determined by our chief executive officer after our Consolidated
EBITDA, as further adjusted to exclude acquired EBITDA and cost
savings, for the preceding fiscal year is determined. For
purposes of this Compensation Discussion and Analysis,
references to EBITDA mean our Consolidated EBITDA, as further
adjusted to exclude acquired EBITDA and cost savings. In making
the determination of the amount of money available for the
employee bonus pool, the chief executive officer takes into
account a number of factors, including: EBITDA; growth in EBITDA
over the preceding year; minimum Consolidated EBITDA required to
ensure debt covenant compliance; our short-term cash needs; the
recent employee turnover rate and any improvement or
deterioration in our strategic market position. Thereafter, the
amount available for the bonuses to named executive officers is
determined after considering the amount that would be required
from the bonus pool for bonuses to non-executive officer
employees. In making his determination for 2009, the principal
factors that our chief executive officer took into account in
determining the size of the
111
pool were our actual EBITDA, which was achieved in a difficult
economic environment, and the improvement in our strategic
market position. Other factors that our chief executive officer
considered were the assurance of debt covenant compliance and of
meeting our short-term cash needs. In the case of the 2009 bonus
pool, the improvement in our strategic market position,
assurance of debt covenant compliance and meeting of our
short-term cash needs caused the size of the bonus pool to
increase, which increase was partially offset due to a slight
decline in our actual EBITDA. The amount available for the
bonuses to the named executive officers was determined after
considering the amount that would be needed from the bonus pool
for bonuses to other officers and managers.
Stock option
awards
In August 2006, our board of directors and stockholders adopted
the 2006 equity incentive plan, which provides for the grant of
options to purchase shares of our common stock to employees,
consultants and directors and provides for the sale of our
common stock to employees, consultants and directors. A maximum
of 11,173,819 shares of common stock are reserved for
issuance under the plan. Options may be incentive stock options
that qualify under Section 422 of the Internal Revenue Code
of 1986, or nonqualified options. Options granted under the plan
may not be exercised more than ten years after the date of
grant. Shares acquired by any individuals pursuant to the plan
will be subject to the terms and conditions of a stockholders
agreement that governs the transferability of the shares.
During August 2006, we awarded our named executive officers
long-term incentive compensation in the form of option grants to
purchase an aggregate of 3,507,491 shares of our common
stock. Of these option grants, Mr. Stone received an option
to purchase 1,508,597 shares of our common stock,
Mr. Boulanger received an option to purchase
1,131,452 shares of our common stock, Mr. Pedonti
received an option to purchase 565,726 shares of our common
stock and Mr. Whitman received an option to purchase
301,716 shares of our common stock. Our board of directors
awarded the following types of options to our named executive
officers:
|
|
|
40% of the options are time-based options that
vested as to 25% of the number of shares underlying the option
on November 23, 2006 and as to
1/36
of the number of shares underlying the option each month
thereafter until fully vested on November 23, 2009;
|
|
|
40% of the options are performance-based options
that vest based on the determination by our board of directors
or compensation committee as to whether our EBITDA for each
fiscal year 2006 through 2010 falls within the targeted EBITDA
range for such year. If our EBITDA for a particular year is at
the low end of the targeted EBITDA range, 50% of the
performance-based option for that year vests, and if our EBITDA
is at or above the high end of the targeted EBITDA range, 100%
of the performance-based option for that year vests. If our
EBITDA is below the targeted EBITDA range, the performance-based
option does not vest, and if our EBITDA is within the targeted
EBITDA range, between 50% and 100% of the performance-based
option vests, based on linear interpolation. A certain
percentage of performance-based options will also vest
immediately prior to the effective date of a liquidity event if
proceeds from the liquidity event equal or exceed specified
returns on investments in SS&C Holdings made by investment
funds affiliated with Carlyle; and
|
|
|
20% of the options were initially superior options,
which upon the closing of our IPO became performance-based
options, as described below.
|
The exercise price per share for the options awarded in August
2006 is $8.77, which is the split-adjusted value of our common
stock at the time of the consummation of the Transaction. As
112
there was no trading market for our common stock at the time of
grant, our board of directors determined in good faith that the
valuation of the consolidated enterprise at the time of the
Transaction continued to represent the fair market value of the
common stock as of August 2006. Our board of directors
determined the number of options to be awarded to the named
executive officers based on projected ownership percentages of
our common stock that were disclosed in connection with the
Transaction. At that time, we disclosed that Mr. Stone was
entitled to options for 2% of our fully diluted shares, per his
employment agreement, and that we would award options
representing an aggregate of 2.9% of our fully diluted shares to
our other named executive officers.
We believe that the combination of time-based and
performance-based options provides incentives to our named
executive officers not only to remain with the company but also
to help grow the company and improve profitability. The 2006
EBITDA range contained in the performance-based options was not
met, and thus none of the performance-based options had vested
as of December 31, 2006. On April 18, 2007, our board
of directors approved (1) the vesting, as of April 18,
2007, of 50% of the performance-based options granted to our
employees for fiscal year 2006 set forth in the employees
stock option agreements; (2) the vesting, conditioned upon
our achieving 2007 EBITDA within the EBITDA range for fiscal
year 2007 set forth in the employees stock option
agreements, of the other 50% of the 2006 tranche of the
performance-based options; and (3) the reduction by
approximately 10% of our EBITDA range for fiscal year 2007 set
forth in the employees stock option agreements. Our board
of directors decided that a partial acceleration of the 2006
performance-based options and a reduction in the 2007 EBITDA
range were appropriate because (1) we had improved
revenues, recurring revenues and EBITDA in 2006 as compared to
2005; (2) work done in 2006 had created significant
positive momentum in the business going into 2007; and
(3) given the competitive labor environment in financial
services and in software-enabled services, the board desired to
ensure high rates of employee retention as we pursued our plan
for growth.
Our 2007 EBITDA fell within the revised EBITDA range for fiscal
year 2007. Accordingly, as of December 31, 2007, 86.74% of
the remaining 50% of the 2006 tranche and of the 2007 tranche of
performance options vested. In March 2008, our board approved
(1) the vesting, conditioned upon our EBITDA for 2008
falling within the targeted range, of the 2006 and 2007
performance-based options that did not otherwise vest during
2007, and (2) the reduction of our annual EBITDA target
range for 2008. Our 2008 EBITDA fell within the revised EBITDA
range for fiscal year 2008. Accordingly, as of December 31,
2008, 96.294% of the remaining 2006 and 2007 tranches and of the
2008 tranche of performance options vested. In recognition of
our performance in a difficult market period, in February 2009,
our board approved the vesting of the 2006, 2007 and 2008
performance-based options that did not otherwise vest during
2008.
In February 2009, our board of directors approved the immediate
vesting of the 2006, 2007 and 2008 performance-based options
that did not otherwise vest during 2006, 2007 or 2008 and
established our annual EBITDA target range for 2009, which range
was $97.8 million to $108.7 million. Our actual 2009 EBITDA of
$111.2 million exceeded the targeted range and, accordingly,
100% of the 2009 tranche of performance-based options vested as
of December 31, 2009.
On February 4, 2010, our compensation committee, in
anticipation of our IPO, amended the outstanding options under
our 2006 equity incentive plan to provide greater incentives to
our named executive officers and employees and to eliminate
certain provisions of the options that our compensation
committee believed were more typical of private-company options
than
113
options of publicly traded companies. Specifically, our
compensation committee amended the options, effective as of the
closing of our IPO, to provide for:
|
|
|
the conversion of the outstanding superior options granted under
the 2006 equity incentive plan into performance-based options
that vest based on our EBITDA performance in 2010 and 2011,
which affected 1,680,868 outstanding options, of which 701,497
were held by our named executive officers;
|
|
|
the elimination of pre-determined EBITDA ranges from the option
agreements and provision for the annual proposal of EBITDA
ranges by management, subject to approval by our board, which
EBITDA target range for 2010 was established by our board in a
subsequent meeting described below; and
|
|
|
the rolling over of performance-based options that
do not vest (in whole or in part) in any given year into
performance-based options for the following year, except as
otherwise provided by our board of directors. Under our 2006
equity incentive plan, our board has the authority to amend the
options to effect such a rollover and, generally,
has the authority to amend, suspend or terminate any option,
provided that, except with respect to specified corporate
events, neither the amendment, suspension nor termination of the
option shall, without the consent of the optionee, alter or
impair any rights or obligations under the option. The rollover
affected 689,007 outstanding unvested performance-based options,
of which 280,600 were held by our named executive officers, and
affected 1,680,868 outstanding superior options, of which
701,497 were held by our named executive officers, that
converted to performance-based options upon the closing of our
IPO.
|
In addition, on February 24, 2010, our board established
our annual EBITDA target range for 2010 and eliminated the
previously established EBITDA target for 2011. The establishment
of the 2010 EBITDA target range affected 1,512,781 options, of
which 631,349 were held by our named executive officers,
including 840,434 superior options, of which 350,749 were held
by our named executive officers, that converted to 2010
performance-based options upon the closing of our IPO.
As of February 24, 2010, we estimated the weighted-average
fair value of the performance-based options that vest upon the
attainment of the 2010 EBITDA target range to be $6.90. In
estimating the common stock value, we used our most recent
equity valuation which utilized the income approach and the
guideline company method. We used the following weighted-average
assumptions to estimate the option value: expected term to
exercise of 2.5 years; expected volatility of 43%;
risk-free interest rate of 1.2%; and no dividend yield. Expected
volatility is based on the historical volatility of our peer
group. Expected term to exercise is based on our historical
stock option exercise experience, adjusted for the Transaction.
The total unearned non-cash stock-based compensation cost
related to the performance-based awards that vest based upon
achieving the 2010 EBITDA target, excluding the potential
conversion of superior options to performance-based options,
that we could recognize during 2010 was estimated to be
approximately $4.6 million. We estimated we could recognize
approximately an additional $5.8 million of non-cash
stock-based compensation cost related to the conversion of
superior options to 2010 performance-based options during 2010.
Upon the closing of our IPO, we evaluated the likelihood that we
would achieve our 2010 EBITDA target. We recorded additional
stock-based compensation expense upon the closing of our IPO as
a result of the changes to the superior options, which was
determined based on
114
(1) the likelihood of achieving our 2010 EBITDA target and
(2) the period of time that elapsed between the February
modification and the closing of our IPO.
The superior options that converted to performance-based options
that vest based upon our EBITDA for 2011 will be re-measured
when our board determines the EBITDA target range for 2011.
Our board believes these changes will make the options work more
effectively as incentives for our named executive officers and
employees and thus provide greater benefits to our stockholders.
The amendments make it easier to predict the vesting of options
that are not time-based. In addition, by requiring the
establishment of annual EBITDA ranges, the amendments make the
EBITDA targets more realistic and therefore provide a tighter
link between performance and vesting.
On February 16, 2010, we entered into an amended and
restated stock option agreement with Mr. Stone governing an
option that SS&C originally granted to Mr. Stone on
February 17, 2000 under its 1998 stock incentive plan.
Pursuant to the amended and restated stock option agreement, the
option (which was previously an option to purchase
637,500 shares of our common stock at an exercise price of
$0.87 per share) was amended to make it an option to purchase
637,500 shares of our Class A non-voting common stock
at an exercise price of $0.87 per share. Mr. Stone
exercised the option on February 17, 2010 and purchased
637,500 shares of our Class A non-voting common stock.
In February 2010, we awarded our named executive officers
long-term incentive compensation under our 2006 equity incentive
plan in the form of time-based option grants to purchase an
aggregate of 318,750 shares of our common stock. Of these
option grants, Mr. Stone received an option to purchase
127,500 shares of our common stock, Mr. Boulanger
received an option to purchase 85,000 shares of our common
stock, Mr. Pedonti received an option to purchase
63,750 shares of our common stock and Mr. Whitman
received an option to purchase 42,500 shares of our common
stock. The options vest as to 25% of the number of shares
underlying the option on February 4, 2011 and as to
1/36
of the number of shares underlying the option each month
thereafter until fully vested on February 4, 2014, subject
to acceleration of vesting in connection with a liquidity event.
The options have an exercise price of $14.53 per share,
which our board of directors determined was equal to the
estimated fair value of our common stock on the date of the
grant.
Restricted stock
awards
In connection with the amendment and restatement of
Mr. Stones employment contract in March 2010, we
granted Mr. Stone 153,846 restricted shares of our
Class A non-voting common stock under the 2006 equity
incentive plan. The restricted shares vest over a period of
three years from March 11, 2010, with one-third of the
shares vesting on March 11, 2011 and the remaining
two-thirds of the shares vesting in eight equal quarterly
installments over the remaining two years.
Benefits and
Perquisites
We offer a variety of benefit programs to all eligible
employees, including our named executive officers. Our named
executive officers generally are eligible for the same benefits
on the same basis as the rest of our employees, including
medical, dental and vision benefits, life insurance coverage and
short- and long-term disability coverage. Our named executive
officers are also
115
eligible to contribute to our 401(k) plan and receive matching
company contributions under the plan. In addition, our named
executive officers are entitled to reimbursement for all
reasonable travel and other expenses incurred during the
performance of the named executive officers duties in
accordance with our expense reimbursement policy.
We limit the use of perquisites as a method of compensation and
provide our named executive officers with only those perquisites
that we believe are reasonable and consistent with our overall
compensation program to better enable us to attract and retain
talented employees for key positions.
Severance and
change-of-control
benefits
Pursuant to his employment agreement, Mr. Stone is entitled
to specified benefits in the event of the termination of his
employment under certain circumstances. We provide more detailed
information about Mr. Stones benefits along with
estimates of their value under various circumstances, under the
captions Employment and related agreements and
Potential payments upon termination or change of
control below.
As described above, the time-based options awarded to our named
executive officers vest in full immediately prior to the
effective date of a liquidity event, and the performance-based
options vest in whole or in part if proceeds from the liquidity
event equal or exceed specified returns on investments in us
made by investment funds affiliated with Carlyle. The option
agreements, the terms of which were negotiated with
representatives of Carlyle, define a liquidity event
as either:
(a) the consummation of the sale, transfer, conveyance or
other disposition in one or a series of related transactions, of
the equity securities of SS&C Holdings held, directly or
indirectly, by investment funds affiliated with Carlyle in
exchange for currency, such that immediately following such
transaction (or series of related transactions), the total
number of all equity securities held, directly or indirectly, by
all such Carlyle funds and any affiliates is, in the aggregate,
less than 50% of the total number of equity securities (as
adjusted) held, directly or indirectly, by such Carlyle funds
immediately following the consummation of this offering; or
(b) the consummation of the sale, lease, transfer,
conveyance or other disposition (other than by way of merger or
consolidation), in one or a series of related transactions, of
all or substantially all of the assets of SS&C Holdings to
any person other than to any of the Carlyle funds or their
affiliates.
The consummation of this offering will not constitute a
liquidity event under this definition. Under the terms of the
2006 equity incentive plan, either our board or compensation
committee can accelerate in whole or in part the vesting periods
for outstanding options. Please see Potential payments
upon termination or change of control below for estimates
of the value our named executive officers would receive in the
event of a liquidity event.
Accounting and
tax implications
The accounting and tax treatment of particular forms of
compensation do not materially affect our compensation
decisions. However, we evaluate the effect of such accounting
and tax treatment on an ongoing basis and will make appropriate
modifications to compensation policies where appropriate. For
instance, Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code
generally disallows a tax deduction to public companies for
certain compensation in excess of $1 million
116
paid in any taxable year to the companys chief executive
officer and any other officers (other than the chief financial
officer) whose compensation is required to be reported to our
stockholders pursuant to the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, or
the Exchange Act, by reason of being among the four most highly
paid executive officers. However, certain compensation,
including qualified performance-based compensation, will not be
subject to the deduction limit if certain requirements are met.
The compensation committee may review the potential effect of
Section 162(m) periodically and use its judgment to
authorize compensation payments that may be subject to the limit
when the compensation committee believes such payments are
appropriate and in our best interests after taking into
consideration changing business conditions and the performance
of our employees.
Summary
compensation table
The following table contains information with respect to the
compensation for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2010,
2009 and 2008 of our executive officers, including our chief
executive officer (principal executive officer) and chief
financial officer (principal financial officer). We refer to
these four executive officers, who are our only executive
officers, as our named executive officers.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name and
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock
|
|
|
Option
|
|
|
All other
|
|
|
|
|
principal position
|
|
Year
|
|
|
Salary($)
|
|
|
Bonus($)1
|
|
|
awards($)2
|
|
|
awards($)2
|
|
|
compensation($)
|
|
|
Total($)
|
|
|
|
|
William C. Stone
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
$
|
750,000
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
2,235,382
|
|
|
|
1,614,867
|
|
|
$
|
4,032
|
3
|
|
$
|
4,604,281
|
|
Chief Executive Officer
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
750,000
|
|
|
|
1,750,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,552
|
|
|
|
2,503,552
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
737,500
|
|
|
|
1,500,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,552
|
|
|
|
2,241,052
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Normand A. Boulanger
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
450,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,163,531
|
|
|
|
3,375
|
4
|
|
|
1,616,906
|
|
Chief Operating Officer
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
450,000
|
|
|
|
800,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,360
|
|
|
|
1,253,360
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
445,833
|
|
|
|
750,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,360
|
|
|
|
1,199,193
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Patrick J. Pedonti
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
260,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
677,010
|
|
|
|
4,032
|
5
|
|
|
941,042
|
|
Chief Financial Officer
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
260,000
|
|
|
|
340,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,032
|
|
|
|
604,032
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
257,083
|
|
|
|
300,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,011
|
|
|
|
561,094
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stephen V.R. Whitman
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
225,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
399,166
|
|
|
|
4,386
|
6
|
|
|
628,552
|
|
General Counsel
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
225,000
|
|
|
|
225,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,386
|
|
|
|
454,386
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
223,333
|
|
|
|
200,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,360
|
|
|
|
427,693
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
Amounts reflected for the year 2008
reflect bonuses earned in 2008 and paid in 2009. Amounts
reflected for the year 2009 reflect bonuses earned in 2009 and
paid in 2010. Bonus amounts payable for 2010 have not yet been
determined. The determination of whether and to what extent
bonuses will be payable for 2010 will be made by the
compensation committee. Bonuses paid for 2010 are expected to be
determined in February 2011 and paid in March 2011.
|
|
(2)
|
|
The amounts in these columns
reflect the aggregate accounting grant date fair value of awards
to our named executive officers as well as the incremental fair
value of superior options that were converted to
performance-based options upon the closing of our IPO, in each
case computed in accordance with Financial Accounting Standards
Board, or FASB, Accounting Standard Codification Topic 718. The
assumptions used by us in the valuation of the equity awards are
set forth in Note 10 of the notes to our annual
consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this
prospectus.
|
|
(3)
|
|
Consists of our contribution of
$3,000 to Mr. Stones account under the SS&C
401(k) savings plan and our payment of $1,032 of group term life
premiums for the benefit of Mr. Stone.
|
|
(4)
|
|
Consists of our contribution of
$3,000 to Mr. Boulangers account under the SS&C
401(k) savings plan and our payment of $375 of group term life
premiums for the benefit of Mr. Boulanger.
|
|
(5)
|
|
Consists of our contribution of
$3,000 to Mr. Pedontis account under the SS&C
401(k) savings plan and our payment of $1,032 of group term life
premiums for the benefit of Mr. Pedonti.
|
|
(6)
|
|
Consists of our contribution of
$3,000 to Mr. Whitmans account under the SS&C
401(k) savings plan and our payment of $1,386 of group term life
premiums for the benefit of Mr. Whitman.
|
117
Employment and
related agreements
Effective as of November 23, 2005, we entered into a
definitive employment agreement with Mr. Stone. We amended
and restated Mr. Stones employment agreement in March
2010. The terms of the agreement, which were negotiated between
Mr. Stone and representatives of Carlyle, include the
following:
|
|
|
The employment of Mr. Stone as the chief executive officer
of SS&C Holdings and SS&C;
|
|
|
An initial term through March 11, 2013 with automatic
one-year renewals until terminated either by Mr. Stone or
us;
|
|
|
An annual base salary of at least $750,000;
|
|
|
An opportunity to receive an annual bonus in an amount to be
established by our board of directors based on achieving
individual and company performance goals as determined by our
compensation committee. If Mr. Stone is employed at the end
of any calendar year, his annual bonus will not be less than
$500,000 for that year;
|
|
|
A grant of 153,846 shares of our restricted Class A
non-voting
common stock that vests over a period of three years from
March 25, 2010;
|
|
|
Certain severance payments and benefits. If we terminate
Mr. Stones employment without cause, if
Mr. Stone resigns for good reason (including, under certain
circumstances, following a change of control as defined in the
employment agreement) prior to the end of the term of the
employment agreement, or if Mr. Stone receives a notice of
non-renewal of the employment term by us, Mr. Stone will be
entitled to receive (1) an amount equal to 200% of his base
salary and 200% of his minimum annual bonus, (2) vesting
acceleration with respect to 50% of his then unvested options
and 100% of his shares of restricted stock, and (3) three
years of coverage under SS&Cs medical, dental and
vision benefit plans. In the event of Mr. Stones
death or a termination of Mr. Stones employment due
to any disability that renders Mr. Stone unable to perform
his duties under the agreement for six consecutive months,
Mr. Stone or his representative or heirs, as applicable,
will be entitled to receive (1) vesting acceleration with
respect to 50% of his then unvested options and 100% of his
shares of restricted stock, and (2) a pro-rated amount of
his most recent annual bonus. In the event payments to
Mr. Stone under his employment agreement (or the management
agreement entered into in connection with the Transaction) cause
Mr. Stone to incur a 20% excise tax under Section 4999
of the Internal Revenue Code, Mr. Stone will be entitled to
an additional payment sufficient to cover such excise tax and
any taxes associated with such payments; and
|
|
|
Certain restrictive covenants, including a non-competition
covenant pursuant to which Mr. Stone will be prohibited
from competing with SS&C and its affiliates during his
employment and for a period equal to the later of (1) four
years following the March 2010 amendment and restatement of the
agreement, in the case of a termination by us for cause or a
resignation by Mr. Stone without good reason, and
(2) two years following Mr. Stones termination
of employment for any reason.
|
Cause means (a) Mr. Stones willful
and continuing failure (except where due to physical or mental
incapacity) to substantially perform his duties;
(b) Mr. Stones conviction of, or plea of guilty
or nolo contendere to, a felony; (c) the commission by
Mr. Stone of an act of fraud or embezzlement against us or
any of our subsidiaries as determined in good faith by a
two-thirds
118
majority of the board; or (d) Mr. Stones breach
of any material provision of his employment agreement.
Good reason means the occurrence of any of the
following events without Mr. Stones written consent:
(a) an adverse change in Mr. Stones title;
(b) a material diminution in Mr. Stones
employment duties, responsibilities or authority, or the
assignment to Mr. Stone of duties that are materially
inconsistent with his position; (c) any reduction in
Mr. Stones base salary or minimum annual bonus;
(d) a relocation of our principal executive offices to a
location more than 35 miles from its current location which
has the effect of increasing Mr. Stones commute;
(e) any breach by us of any material provision of
Mr. Stones employment agreement or the stockholders
agreement entered into by and among us, investment funds
affiliated with Carlyle and Mr. Stone; or (f) upon a
change in control where (1) Carlyle exercises its
bring-along rights in accordance with the stockholders
agreement, and (2) Mr. Stone votes against the
proposed transaction in his capacity as a stockholder.
Under Mr. Stones employment agreement, a change
of control means:
(a) the acquisition by any individual, entity or group
(within the meaning of Section 13(d)(3) or 14(d)(2) of the
Exchange Act) of beneficial ownership (within the meaning of
Rule 13d-3
promulgated under the Exchange Act) of 50% or more of either:
|
|
|
|
|
the then-outstanding shares of our common stock or the common
stock of SS&C, or
|
|
|
|
the combined voting power of our then-outstanding voting
securities or the then-outstanding voting securities of
SS&C entitled to vote generally in the election of
directors (in each case, other than any acquisition by us,
Carlyle Partners IV, L.P. (an investment fund affiliated with
Carlyle), Mr. Stone, any employee or group of employees of
ours, or affiliates of any of the foregoing, or by any employee
benefit plan (or related trust) sponsored or maintained by us or
any of our affiliates); or
|
(b) individuals who, as of the effective date of
Mr. Stones employment agreement, constituted our
board of directors and any individuals subsequently elected to
our board of directors pursuant to the stockholders agreement
cease for any reason to constitute at least a majority of our
board of directors, other than:
|
|
|
|
|
individuals whose election, or nomination for election by our
stockholders, was approved by at least a majority of the
directors comprising the board of directors on the effective
date of Mr. Stones employment agreement and any
individuals subsequently elected to our board of directors
pursuant to the stockholders agreement or
|
|
|
|
individuals nominated or designated for election by Carlyle
Partners IV, L.P.
|
Other than Mr. Stone, none of our named executive officers
is party to an employment agreement.
119
2010 grants of
plan-based awards
The following table sets forth information regarding grants of
compensation in the form of plan-based awards made during 2010
to our named executive officers.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
option awards:
|
|
|
Exercise
|
|
|
Grant date fair
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All other
|
|
|
number of
|
|
|
price of
|
|
|
value of stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
stock awards:
|
|
|
securities
|
|
|
option
|
|
|
and option
|
|
|
|
Grant
|
|
|
number of
|
|
|
underlying
|
|
|
awards
|
|
|
awards
|
|
Name
|
|
date1
|
|
|
shares of stock (#)
|
|
|
options (#)
|
|
|
($/share)
|
|
|
($)2
|
|
|
|
|
William C. Stone
|
|
|
2/4/2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
127,500
|
3
|
|
$
|
14.53
|
|
|
$
|
571,468
|
|
|
|
|
3/25/2010
|
|
|
|
153,846
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
2,235,382
|
|
Normand A. Boulanger
|
|
|
2/4/2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
85,000
|
3
|
|
$
|
14.53
|
|
|
$
|
380,979
|
|
Patrick J. Pedonti
|
|
|
2/4/2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
63,750
|
3
|
|
$
|
14.53
|
|
|
$
|
285,734
|
|
Stephen V.R. Whitman
|
|
|
2/4/2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
42,500
|
3
|
|
$
|
14.53
|
|
|
$
|
190,489
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
Awarded under the 2006 equity
incentive plan.
|
(2)
|
|
The amounts in this column reflect
the aggregate accounting grant date fair value of awards to our
named executive officers, computed in accordance with FASB
Accounting Standards Codification Topic 718. The assumptions
used by us in the valuation of the equity awards are set forth
in Note 10 of the notes to our annual consolidated
financial statements included elsewhere in this prospectus.
|
(3)
|
|
This option is a time-based option
that vests as to 25% of the number of shares underlying the
option on February 4, 2011 and as to
1/36
of the number of shares underlying the option each month
thereafter until fully vested on February 4, 2014, subject
to acceleration of vesting in connection with a liquidity event.
|
(4)
|
|
Represents restricted shares of our
Class A non-voting common stock granted under the 2006
equity incentive plan. The restricted shares vest over a period
of three years from March 11, 2010, with one-third of the
shares vesting on March 11, 2011 and the remaining
two-thirds of the shares vesting in eight equal quarterly
installments over the remaining two years.
|
Equity incentive
plans
1998 stock
incentive plan
In 1998, the board of directors of SS&C adopted, and the
stockholders of SS&C approved, the 1998 stock incentive
plan, or 1998 plan, to provide equity compensation to
SS&Cs officers, directors, employees, consultants and
advisors. In connection with the Transaction, all outstanding
options to purchase SS&C common stock under the 1998 plan
became fully vested and exercisable immediately prior to the
effectiveness of the Acquisition. Each SS&C option that
remained outstanding under the 1998 plan at the time of the
Acquisition (other than options held by (1) non-employee
directors of SS&C, (2) certain individuals identified
by SS&C and SS&C Holdings and (3) individuals who
held options that were, in the aggregate, exercisable for fewer
than 100 shares of SS&C common stock) was assumed by
SS&C Holdings and was automatically converted into an
option to purchase shares of common stock of SS&C Holdings.
The options that were not assumed or otherwise exercised
immediately prior to the Acquisition were cashed out in
connection with the Acquisition. Since the Acquisition, we have
granted no further options or other awards under the 1998 plan.
Our ability to grant options or other awards under the 1998 plan
has terminated in accordance with the terms of the plan. On
May 17, 2006, our board of directors adopted, and our
stockholders approved, the amendment and restatement of the 1998
plan, which reflects, among other things, the formal assumption
of the 1998 plan by SS&C Holdings. As of December 31,
2010, there were outstanding options under
120
the 1998 plan to purchase a total of 2,256,307 shares of
our common stock at a weighted average exercise price of $1.79
per share.
1999 non-officer
employee stock incentive plan
In 1999, the board of directors of SS&C adopted the 1999
non-officer employee stock incentive plan, or 1999 plan, to
provide equity compensation to SS&Cs employees,
consultants and advisors other than its executive officers and
directors. In connection with the Transaction, all outstanding
options to purchase SS&C common stock under the 1999 plan
became fully vested and exercisable immediately prior to the
effectiveness of the Acquisition. Each SS&C option that
remained outstanding under the 1999 plan at the time of the
Acquisition (other than options held by (1) certain
individuals identified by SS&C and SS&C Holdings and
(2) individuals who held options that were, in the
aggregate, exercisable for fewer than 100 shares of
SS&C common stock) was assumed by SS&C Holdings and
was automatically converted into an option to purchase shares of
common stock of SS&C Holdings. The options that were not
assumed or otherwise exercised immediately prior to the
Acquisition were cashed out in connection with the Acquisition.
Since the Acquisition, we have granted no further options or
other awards under the 1999 plan. Our ability to grant options
or other awards under the 1999 plan has terminated in accordance
with the terms of the plan. On May 17, 2006, our board of
directors adopted, and our stockholders approved, the amendment
and restatement of the 1999 plan, which reflects, among other
things, the formal assumption of the 1999 plan by SS&C
Holdings. As of December 31, 2010, there were outstanding
options under the 1999 plan to purchase a total of
106,080 shares of our common stock at a weighted average
exercise price of $5.76 per share.
2006 equity
incentive plan
In August 2006, our board of directors adopted, and our
stockholders approved, our 2006 equity incentive plan. Our 2006
equity incentive plan provides for the granting of options,
restricted stock and other stock-based awards to our employees,
consultants and directors and our subsidiaries employees,
consultants and directors. A maximum of 11,173,819 shares
of our common stock are reserved for issuance under our 2006
equity incentive plan, and the unexercised portion of any shares
of common stock subject to awards that is forfeited,
repurchased, expires or lapses under the 2006 equity incentive
plan will again become available for the grant of awards under
the 2006 equity incentive plan except for vested shares of
common stock that are forfeited or repurchased after being
issued from the 2006 equity incentive plan.
As of December 31, 2010, options to purchase a total of
8,266,345 shares of common stock were outstanding under our
2006 equity incentive plan at a weighted average exercise price
of $9.24 per share. As of December 31, 2010, we had issued
952,813 shares of common stock under the 2006 equity
incentive plan, and 1,497,711 shares remained available for
future awards under the plan.
Our board of directors or a committee appointed by our board of
directors administers our 2006 equity incentive plan. The
administrator is authorized to take any action with respect to
our 2006 equity incentive plan, including:
|
|
|
to prescribe, amend and rescind rules and regulations relating
to our 2006 equity incentive plan;
|
|
|
to determine the type or types of awards to be granted under our
2006 equity incentive plan;
|
|
|
to select the persons to whom awards may be granted under our
2006 equity incentive plan;
|
121
|
|
|
to grant awards and to determine the terms and conditions of
such awards;
|
|
|
to construe and interpret our 2006 equity incentive
plan; and
|
|
|
to amend, suspend or terminate our 2006 equity incentive plan.
|
We grant stock options under our 2006 equity incentive plan
pursuant to a stock grant notice and stock option agreement,
which we refer to as the option agreement. Options may be
incentive stock options that qualify under Section 422 of
the Internal Revenue Code, or nonqualified options. Options
granted under our 2006 equity incentive plan may not be
exercised more than ten years after the date of grant. The
option agreement provides, among other things, that:
|
|
|
each option will vest, depending on the classification of the
option as a time option, performance option or superior option,
as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Time options will vest as to 25% of the number of shares
underlying the option on a date certain (November 23, 2006
for the first tranche of options awarded under the plan in
August 2006, but generally the first anniversary of either the
date of grant or the start date for a new employee) and will
continue to vest as to 1/36 of the number of shares underlying
the option on the day of the month of the date of grant each
month thereafter until such options are fully vested. Time
options will become fully vested and exercisable immediately
prior to the effective date of a liquidity event as defined in
the stock option agreement.
|
|
|
|
A certain percentage of the performance options will vest based
on the administrators determination as to whether our
EBITDA for each fiscal year 2006 through 2010 (2007 through 2011
for options awarded in 2007) falls within the targeted
EBITDA range for such year. If our EBITDA is at or above the
high end of the targeted EBITDA range, 100% of the
performance-based option for that year vests. If our EBITDA is
below the targeted EBITDA range, the performance-based option
does not vest, and if our EBITDA is within the targeted EBITDA
range, between 50% and 100% of the performance-based option
vests, based on linear interpolation. In February 2009, our
board of directors approved the immediate vesting of the 2006,
2007 and 2008 performance-based options that did not otherwise
vest during 2006, 2007 or 2008. A certain percentage of
performance options will also vest immediately prior to the
effective date of a liquidity event if proceeds from the
liquidity event equal or exceed a certain target.
|
|
|
|
The superior options became performance-based options upon the
closing of our IPO that vest based on our EBITDA performance in
2010 and 2011.
|
|
|
|
any portion of an option that is unvested at the time of a
participants termination of service with us will be
forfeited to us; and
|
|
|
any portion of an option that is vested but unexercised at the
time of a participants termination of service with us may
not be exercised after the first to occur of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
the expiration date of the option, which will be no later than
ten years from the date of grant;
|
|
|
|
90 days following the date of the termination of service
for any reason other than cause, death or disability;
|
122
|
|
|
|
|
the date of the termination of service for cause; and
|
|
|
|
twelve months following the termination of service by reason of
the participants death or disability.
|
Restricted stock awards may also be granted under our 2006
equity incentive plan and are evidenced by a stock award
agreement. Upon termination of a participants employment
or service, shares of restricted stock that are not vested at
such time will be forfeited to us. Our 2006 equity incentive
plan also gives the administrator discretion to grant stock
awards free of restrictions on transfer or forfeiture.
If a change in control of our company occurs, the administrator
may, in its sole discretion, cause any and all awards
outstanding under our 2006 equity incentive plan to terminate on
or immediately prior to the date of such change in control and
will give each participant the right to exercise the vested
portion of such awards during a period of time prior to such
change in control. Our 2006 equity incentive plan will terminate
on August 8, 2016, unless the administrator terminates it
sooner. Please see Compensation discussion and
analysisComponents of our executive compensation
programStock option awards for additional
information relating to our 2006 equity incentive plan and
awards thereunder.
2008 stock
incentive plan
In April 2008, our board of directors adopted, and our
stockholders approved, our 2008 stock incentive plan. In July
2008, our board of directors voted that the 2008 stock incentive
plan would become effective after stockholder approval rather
than upon the effectiveness of our IPO. On July 30, 2008,
our stockholders approved the 2008 stock incentive plan,
effective as of the date of approval. Our 2008 stock incentive
plan provides for the granting of options, stock appreciation
rights, restricted stock, restricted stock units and other
stock-based awards to our employees, officers, directors,
consultants and advisors, and our subsidiaries employees,
officers, directors, consultants and advisors.
The number of shares of our common stock reserved for issuance
under our 2008 stock incentive plan is equal to the sum of:
(1) 1,416,661 shares of common stock; plus
(2) an annual increase to be added on the first day of each
of our fiscal years during the term of the 2008 stock incentive
plan beginning in fiscal 2009 equal to the least of
(i) 1,416,661 shares of common stock, (ii) 2% of
the outstanding shares on such date or (iii) an amount
determined by our board of directors.
As of December 31, 2010, there were 2,361,077 shares
reserved for issuance under the 2008 stock incentive plan. As of
December 31, 2010, options to purchase a total of 1,553,460
shares of common stock were outstanding under our 2008 stock
incentive plan at a weighted average exercise price of $14.54
per share.
Furthermore, if any award expires or is terminated, surrendered
or canceled without having been fully exercised, is forfeited in
whole or in part (including as the result of shares subject to
such award being repurchased pursuant to a contractual
repurchase right), is settled in cash or otherwise results in
any common stock not being issued, the unused common stock
covered by such award shall again be available for the grant of
awards under our 2008 stock incentive plan. In addition, shares
of our common stock tendered to us by a participant in order to
exercise an
123
award shall be added to the number of shares of common stock
available for the grant of awards under our 2008 stock incentive
plan. However, in the case of incentive stock options, the
foregoing provisions shall be subject to any limitations under
the Internal Revenue Code. The maximum number of shares of
common stock with respect to which awards may be granted to any
participant under our 2008 stock incentive plan is
566,661 per calendar year.
Shares issued under our 2008 stock incentive plan may consist in
whole or in part of authorized but unissued shares or treasury
shares. We will adjust the number of shares reserved for
issuance under our 2008 stock incentive plan in the event of any
stock split, reverse stock split, stock dividend,
recapitalization, combination of shares, reclassification of
shares, spin-off or other similar change in capitalization or
event.
Our board of directors or a committee appointed by our board of
directors administers our 2008 stock incentive plan. The
administrator is authorized to take any action with respect to
our 2008 stock incentive plan, including:
|
|
|
to adopt, amend and repeal rules and regulations relating to our
2008 stock incentive plan;
|
|
|
to determine the type or types of awards to be granted under our
2008 stock incentive plan;
|
|
|
to select the persons to whom awards may be granted under our
2008 stock incentive plan;
|
|
|
to grant awards and to determine the terms and conditions of
such awards;
|
|
|
to delegate to one or more of our officers the power to grant
awards under our 2008 stock incentive plan to our employees or
officers (other than executive officers);
|
|
|
to construe and interpret our 2008 stock incentive plan; and
|
|
|
to amend, suspend or terminate our 2008 stock incentive plan,
subject in certain instances to stockholder approval.
|
We grant stock options under our 2008 stock incentive plan
pursuant to a stock option grant notice and stock option
agreement, which we refer to as the option agreement. Options
may be incentive stock options that qualify under
Section 422 of the Internal Revenue Code, or nonstatutory
options. Options granted under our 2008 stock incentive plan may
not be exercised more than ten years after the date of grant.
The option agreement provides, among other things, that:
|
|
|
each option will vest as to 25% of the number of shares
underlying the option on the first anniversary of the date of
grant and will continue to vest as to an additional 1/36 of the
remaining number of shares underlying the option on the day of
the month of the date of grant each month thereafter until the
fourth anniversary of the date of grant;
|
|
|
options will become fully vested and exercisable immediately
prior to the effective date of a change in control as defined in
the stock option agreement;
|
|
|
any portion of an option that is unvested at the time of a
participants termination of service with us will be
forfeited to us; and
|
|
|
any portion of an option that is vested but unexercised at the
time of a participants termination of service with us may
not be exercised after the first to occur of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
the expiration date of the option, which will be no later than
ten years from the date of grant,
|
124
|
|
|
|
|
90 days following the date of the termination of service
for any reason other than cause, death or disability,
|
|
|
|
the date of the termination of service for cause, and
|
|
|
|
twelve months following the termination of service by reason of
the participants death or disability.
|
Stock appreciation rights, restricted stock awards, restricted
stock units and other stock-based awards may also be granted
under our 2008 stock incentive plan. Our 2008 stock incentive
plan gives our board the ability to determine the terms and
conditions for each of these types of awards, including the
duration and exercise price of stock appreciation rights, and
the conditions for vesting and repurchase (or forfeiture) and
the issue price, if any, of restricted stock and restricted
units.
If we undergo a significant corporate event such as a
reorganization, merger, consolidation, liquidation, dissolution
or sale, transfer, exchange or other disposition of all or
substantially all of our stock or assets, exchange of our
securities, issuance of warrants or other rights to purchase our
securities, or the acquisition or disposition of any material
assets or businesses, our 2008 stock incentive plan permits our
board to take any one or more of the following actions as to all
or any (or any portion of) outstanding awards (other than
restricted stock awards) on such terms as the board determines:
|
|
|
provide that awards shall be assumed, or substantially
equivalent awards shall be distributed, by the acquiring or
succeeding corporation;
|
|
|
upon written notice to a participant, provide that the
participants unexercised awards will terminate immediately
prior to the consummation of such corporate event unless
exercised by the participant within a specified period following
the date of notice;
|
|
|
provide that outstanding awards shall become exercisable,
realizable or deliverable, or restrictions applicable to an
award shall lapse, in whole or in part prior to or upon such
corporate event;
|
|
|
in the event of a corporate event under the terms of which
holders of our common stock will receive a cash payment for each
share surrendered in connection with the corporate event, make
or provide for a cash payment to participants in exchange for
the termination of all such awards;
|
|
|
provide that, in connection with our liquidation or dissolution,
awards shall convert into the right to receive liquidation
proceedings (net of any applicable exercise price or tax
withholdings); and
|
|
|
any combination of the foregoing.
|
Our 2008 stock incentive plan does not obligate our board to
treat all types of awards, all awards held by any participant,
or all awards of the same type, identically.
Upon the occurrence of a corporate event of the type described
above, other than our liquidation or dissolution, our 2008 stock
incentive plan provides that our repurchase and other rights
under each outstanding restricted stock award will inure to the
benefit of our successor and will, unless the board determines
otherwise, apply to the cash, securities or other property which
our common stock was converted into or exchanged for pursuant to
such corporate event
125
in the same manner and to the same extent as it applied to our
common stock subject to such restricted stock award. In the
event of our liquidation or dissolution, all restrictions and
conditions on all restricted stock awards then outstanding will
automatically be deemed terminated or satisfied, except as
otherwise provided in the restricted stock award agreement or
other related agreement.
Our board may, without stockholder approval, amend any
outstanding award granted under our 2008 stock incentive plan to
provide an exercise price per share that is lower than the
then-current exercise price per share of any such outstanding
award. Our board may also, without stockholder approval, cancel
any outstanding award (whether or not granted under our 2008
stock incentive plan) and grant in substitution therefor new
awards under our 2008 stock incentive plan covering the same or
a different number of shares of common stock and having an
exercise price per share lower than the then-current exercise
price per share of the cancelled award.
Our 2008 stock incentive plan will terminate ten years following
board adoption, unless the board terminates it sooner.
126
Outstanding
equity awards at 2010 fiscal year-end
The following equity awards granted to our named executive
officers were outstanding as of December 31, 2010.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Option Awards
|
|
|
Stock Awards
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Incentive
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Plan Awards:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
Securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
Market Value
|
|
|
|
Securities
|
|
|
Securities
|
|
|
Underlying
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares or
|
|
|
of Shares
|
|
|
|
Underlying
|
|
|
Underlying
|
|
|
Unexercised
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Units of
|
|
|
or Unit
|
|
|
|
Unexercised
|
|
|
Unexercised
|
|
|
Unearned
|
|
|
Option
|
|
|
Option
|
|
|
Stock that
|
|
|
of Stock
|
|
|
|
Options (#)
|
|
|
Options (#)
|
|
|
Options
|
|
|
Exercise
|
|
|
Expiration
|
|
|
have not
|
|
|
that have not
|
|
Name
|
|
Exercisable
|
|
|
Unexercisable
|
|
|
(#)
|
|
|
Price($)
|
|
|
Date
|
|
|
Vested(#)
|
|
|
Vested($)
|
|
|
|
|
William C. Stone
|
|
|
637,500
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.78
|
|
|
|
5/31/2011
|
|
|
|
153,846
|
2
|
|
$
|
3,155,381
|
3
|
|
|
|
1,275,000
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.89
|
|
|
|
4/8/2013
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
603,439
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8.77
|
|
|
|
8/9/2016
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
603,439
|
5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8.77
|
|
|
|
8/9/2016
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
150,860
|
6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
150,859
|
6
|
|
|
8.77
|
|
|
|
8/9/2016
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
127,500
|
7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14.53
|
|
|
|
2/4/2020
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Normand A. Boulanger
|
|
|
212,500
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.20
|
|
|
|
10/18/2014
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
49,572
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.77
|
|
|
|
2/6/2013
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
452,581
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8.77
|
|
|
|
8/9/2016
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
452,581
|
5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8.77
|
|
|
|
8/9/2016
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
113,145
|
6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
113,145
|
6
|
|
|
8.77
|
|
|
|
8/9/2016
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
85,000
|
7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14.53
|
|
|
|
2/4/2020
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Patrick J. Pedonti
|
|
|
63,741
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.95
|
|
|
|
8/1/2012
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
226,290
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8.77
|
|
|
|
8/9/2016
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
226,290
|
5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8.77
|
|
|
|
8/9/2016
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
56,573
|
6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
56,572
|
6
|
|
|
8.77
|
|
|
|
8/9/2016
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
63,750
|
7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14.53
|
|
|
|
2/4/2020
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stephen V.R. Whitman
|
|
|
7,293
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.77
|
|
|
|
2/6/2013
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
120,686
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8.77
|
|
|
|
8/9/2016
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
120,686
|
5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8.77
|
|
|
|
8/9/2016
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30,172
|
6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30,171
|
6
|
|
|
8.77
|
|
|
|
8/9/2016
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
42,500
|
7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14.53
|
|
|
|
2/4/2020
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
This option was granted under our
1998 stock incentive plan and is fully vested.
|
|
(2)
|
|
Represents restricted shares of our
Class A non-voting common stock granted under the 2006
equity incentive plan on March 25, 2010. The restricted
shares vest over a period of three years from March 11,
2010, with one-third of the shares vesting on March 11,
2011 and the remaining two-thirds of the shares vesting in eight
equal quarterly installments over the remaining two years.
|
|
(3)
|
|
Based upon the vesting of 153,846
unvested shares of our Class A non-voting common stock at
$20.51 per share (the closing price of our common stock as
reported on The NASDAQ Global Select Market on December 31,
2010).
|
|
(4)
|
|
This option is a time-based option
awarded under our 2006 equity incentive plan and is fully vested
|
|
(5)
|
|
This option is a performance-based
option awarded under our 2006 equity incentive plan that vests
based on the determination by our board of directors or
compensation committee as to whether our EBITDA for each fiscal
year 2006 through 2010 falls within the targeted EBITDA range
for such year. If our EBITDA for a particular year is at the low
end of the targeted EBITDA
|
127
|
|
|
|
|
range, 50% of the performance-based
option for that year vests, and if our EBITDA is at or above the
high end of the targeted EBITDA range, 100% of the
performance-based option for that year vests. If our EBITDA is
below the targeted EBITDA range, the performance-based option
does not vest, and if our EBITDA is within the targeted EBITDA
range, between 50% and 100% of the performance-based option
vests, based on linear interpolation. In February 2009, our
board of directors approved the immediate vesting of the 2006,
2007 and 2008 performance-based options that did not otherwise
vest during 2006, 2007 or 2008. In addition, a certain
percentage of this option will vest immediately prior to the
effective date of a liquidity event if proceeds from the
liquidity event equal or exceed specified returns on investments
in us made by investment funds affiliated with Carlyle. We
currently anticipate that our EBITDA for fiscal year 2010 will
be at or above the targeted range. Accordingly, we have treated
this option as though 100% of the performance-based option for
2010 vests.
|
|
(6)
|
|
This option was a superior option
at the time of grant and became a performance-based option that
vests based on the determination by our board of directors or
compensation committee as to whether our EBITDA for fiscal years
2010 and 2011 falls within the targeted EBITDA ranges for such
years. We currently anticipate that our EBITDA for fiscal year
2010 will be at or above the targeted range. Accordingly, we
have treated this option as though 100% of the performance-based
option for 2010 vests.
|
|
(7)
|
|
This option is a time-based option
that vests as to 25% of the number of shares underlying the
option on February 4, 2011 and as to
1/36
of the number of shares underlying the option each month
thereafter until fully vested on February 4, 2014, subject
to acceleration of vesting in connection with a liquidity event.
|
2010 option
exercises
The following table sets forth information concerning stock
options that were exercised by our named executive officers in
2010.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Option exercises
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
shares acquired
|
|
|
Value realized on
|
|
Name
|
|
on exercise(#)
|
|
|
exercise($)
|
|
|
|
|
William C. Stone
|
|
|
637,500
|
1
|
|
$
|
8,708,2502
|
|
Normand A. Boulanger
|
|
|
269,178
|
|
|
|
3,561,2253
|
|
Patrick J. Pedonti
|
|
|
63,750
|
|
|
|
831,9383
|
|
Stephen V.R. Whitman
|
|
|
56,125
|
|
|
|
742,5343
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
Represents shares of our
Class A non-voting common stock.
|
|
(2)
|
|
The dollar value realized on
exercise represents the difference between $14.53 per share
(which our board of directors determined was equal to the
estimated fair value of our common stock on the date of
exercise) and the per-share exercise price of the option.
|
|
(3)
|
|
The dollar value realized on
exercise represents the difference between our initial public
offering price of $15.00 per share (which was the date of
exercise) and the respective per-share exercise price of the
options.
|
Potential
payments upon termination or change of control
William C.
Stone
Effective as of March 11, 2010, we entered into an amended
and restated employment agreement with Mr. Stone. The terms
of the agreement are described under the caption
Employment and related agreements above and
incorporated herein by reference.
The table below reflects the amount of compensation payable to
Mr. Stone in the event of termination of his employment or
a liquidity event (as defined in our 2006 equity incentive
plan). The amounts shown assume that such termination was
effective as of December 31, 2010, and thus include amounts
earned through such time and are estimates of the amounts that
128
would be paid out to him upon his termination. The actual
amounts to be paid out, if any, can only be determined at the
time of his separation.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Without cause, for
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
good reason
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(including certain
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payments to
|
|
changes of
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
William C. Stone
|
|
control) or
|
|
|
For cause or
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
upon termination
|
|
upon notice of
|
|
|
without
|
|
|
Liquidity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
or liquidity event
|
|
non-renewal1
|
|
|
good
reason2
|
|
|
event3
|
|
|
Disability
|
|
|
Death
|
|
|
|
|
Base salary
|
|
$
|
1,500,000
|
4
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Annual bonus
|
|
|
1,000,000
|
5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
500,000
|
6
|
|
|
500,000
|
6
|
Stock options
|
|
|
1,266,767
|
7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,533,535
|
8
|
|
|
1,266,767
|
7
|
|
|
1,266,767
|
7
|
Restricted stock
|
|
|
3,155,381
|
9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,155,381
|
9
|
|
|
3,155,381
|
9
|
Health and welfare benefits
|
|
|
41,692
|
10
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tax gross up payment
|
|
|
3,294,569
|
11
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Disability benefits
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Life insurance proceeds
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
10,258,409
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
2,533,535
|
|
|
|
4,922,148
|
|
|
|
4,922,148
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
The definition of good reason in
Mr. Stones employment agreement includes the
occurrence of a change in control (as defined in
Mr. Stones employment agreement) where (a) Carlyle
exercises its
bring-along
rights in accordance with the stockholders agreement, and (b)
Mr. Stone votes against the transaction in his capacity as
a stockholder.
|
|
(2)
|
|
In the event that
Mr. Stones employment is terminated for cause or
without good reason, he will be entitled to unpaid base salary
through the date of the termination, payment of any annual bonus
earned with respect to a completed fiscal year of SS&C that
is unpaid as of the date of termination and any benefits due to
him under any employee benefit plan, policy, program,
arrangement or agreement.
|
|
(3)
|
|
Liquidity event is defined in Mr.
Stones option agreements governing options granted under
our 2006 equity incentive plan. The consummation of this
offering will not constitute a liquidity event under this
definition. Time-based options will become fully vested and
exercisable immediately prior to the effective date of a
liquidity event. Performance-based options will vest in whole or
in part immediately prior to the effective date of a liquidity
event if proceeds from the liquidity event equal or exceed a
certain target. The payments in this column assume the liquidity
event will generate sufficient proceeds to accelerate in full
the performance-based options.
|
|
(4)
|
|
Consists of 200% of 2010 base
salary payable promptly upon termination.
|
|
(5)
|
|
Consists of 200% of $500,000, the
minimum annual bonus specified for Mr. Stone in his
employment agreement.
|
|
(6)
|
|
Consists of a cash payment equal to
the amount of Mr. Stones annual bonus for 2010,
payable within 60 business days of termination. The amount of
Mr. Stones 2010 annual bonus has not yet been
determined. The figure used for the 2010 annual bonus is
$500,000, the minimum annual bonus specified for Mr. Stone
in his employment agreement.
|
|
(7)
|
|
Vesting acceleration with respect
to unvested options to purchase an aggregate of
139,179 shares of our common stock, which is equal to 50%
of all unvested options held by Mr. Stone on
December 31, 2010, calculated based on the difference
between the respective exercise price of the options and $20.51
(the closing price of our common stock on The Nasdaq Global
Select Market on December 31, 2010).
|
|
(8)
|
|
Vesting acceleration with respect
to unvested options to purchase an aggregate of
278,359 shares of our common stock, which is equal to 100%
of all unvested options held by Mr. Stone on
December 31, 2010, calculated based on the difference
between the respective exercise price of the options and $20.51
(the closing price of our common stock on The Nasdaq Global
Select Market on December 31, 2010).
|
|
|
|
(9)
|
|
Based on the vesting of 153,846
unvested shares of our Class A non-voting common stock at
$20.51 per share (the closing price of our common stock as
reported by The Nasdaq Global Select Market on December 31,
2010).
|
|
(10)
|
|
Represents three years of coverage
under SS&Cs medical, dental and vision benefit plans.
|
|
(11)
|
|
In the event that the severance and
other benefits provided for in Mr. Stones employment
agreement or otherwise payable to him in connection with a
change in control constitute parachute payments
within the meaning of Section 280G of the Internal Revenue
Code and will be subject to the excise tax imposed by
Section 4999 of the Internal Revenue Code, then
Mr. Stone shall receive (a) a payment from us
sufficient to pay such excise tax, and (b) an additional
payment from us sufficient to pay the excise tax and U.S.
federal and state income taxes arising from the payments made by
us to Mr. Stone pursuant to this sentence.
|
129
In accordance with Mr. Stones employment agreement,
none of the severance payments described above will be paid
during the six-month period following his termination of
employment unless we determine, in our good faith judgment, that
paying such amounts at the time or times indicated above would
not cause him to incur an additional tax under Section 409A
of the Internal Revenue Code (in which case such amounts shall
be paid at the time or times indicated above). If the payment of
any amounts are delayed as a result of the previous sentence, on
the first day following the end of the six-month period, we will
pay Mr. Stone a lump-sum amount equal to the cumulative
amounts that would have otherwise been previously paid to him
under his employment agreement. Thereafter, payments will resume
in accordance with the above table.
Other named
executive officers
Other than Mr. Stone, none of our named executive officers
has any arrangement that provides for severance payments. Our
2006 equity incentive plan provides for vesting of stock options
in connection with a liquidity event. Time-based options become
fully vested and exercisable immediately prior to the effective
date of a liquidity event, and a certain percentage of
performance-based options vest immediately prior to the
effective date of a liquidity event if proceeds from the
liquidity event equal or exceed a certain target. The
consummation of this offering will not constitute a liquidity
event under the terms of the 2006 equity incentive plan.
As of December 31, 2010, Messrs. Boulanger, Pedonti
and Whitman held the following unvested stock options that would
have become fully vested upon a liquidity event, assuming that
certain targets with respect to proceeds from the liquidity
event were met.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of shares
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
underlying
|
|
|
Value of unvested
|
|
Name
|
|
unvested
options (#)
|
|
|
options1
|
|
|
|
|
Normand A. Boulanger
|
|
|
198,156
|
|
|
$
|
1,836,742
|
|
Patrick J. Pedonti
|
|
|
120,328
|
|
|
|
1,045,446
|
|
Stephen V.R. Whitman
|
|
|
72,675
|
|
|
|
608,400
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
The value of unvested options was
calculated by multiplying the number of shares underlying
unvested options by $20.51 (the closing price of our common
stock as reported on The NASDAQ Global Select Market on
December 31, 2010) and then deducting the aggregate
exercise price for these options.
|
130
Director
compensation
None of our directors, except Messrs. Etherington and
Michael receives compensation for serving as a director.
Messrs. Etherington and Michael each receive an annual
retainer fee of $25,000 and $2,500 for each board meeting
attended in person. All of the directors are reimbursed for
reasonable
out-of-pocket
expenses associated with their service on the board. The
following table contains information with respect to
Mr. Etheringtons and Mr. Michaels
compensation received during the year ended December 31,
2010 for serving as a director.
2010 director
compensation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fees Earned
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
or Paid in
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name
|
|
Cash
|
|
|
Options Awards
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
William Etherington
|
|
$
|
37,500
|
1
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
$
|
37,500
|
|
Jonathan E. Michael
|
|
|
32,500
|
3
|
|
|
101,788
|
4
|
|
|
134,288
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
For his service as a director,
Mr. Etherington receives an annual retainer fee of $25,000
and $2,500 for each board meeting attended in person.
Mr. Etherington was paid an aggregate of $35,000 for his
service as a director in 2010, including $5,000 for board
meetings that Mr. Etherington attended in person in 2009.
Mr. Etherington earned $2,500 for attending a meeting in
person in 2010 that will be paid in 2011.
|
|
(2)
|
|
Upon his election to the board of
directors in 2006, Mr. Etherington was granted an option to
purchase 21,250 shares of our common stock at an exercise
price per share of $8.77. Such option was 100% vested on the
date of grant.
|
|
(3)
|
|
For his service as a director, Mr.
Michael receives an annual retainer fee of $25,000 and $2,500
for each board meeting attended in person. Mr. Michael was paid
an aggregate of $30,000 for his service as a director in 2010.
Mr. Michael earned $2,500 for attending a meeting in person
in 2010 that will be paid in 2011.
|
|
(4)
|
|
Upon his election to the board of
directors in 2010, Mr. Michael was granted an option to purchase
21,250 shares of our common stock at an exercise price per share
of $15.29. Such option was 100% vested on the date of grant.
The amount in this column reflect the aggregate grant date fair
value of the option, computed in accordance with FASB Accounting
Standards Topic 718. The assumptions used by us in the
valuation of the option are set forth in Note 10 of the
notes to our annual consolidated financial statements included
elsewhere in this prospectus.
|
Limitation of
liability and indemnification
Our certificate of incorporation limits the liability of
directors to the maximum extent permitted by Delaware law.
Delaware law provides that directors of a corporation will not
be personally liable for monetary damages for breaches of their
fiduciary duties as directors, except liability for:
|
|
|
any breach of the directors duty of loyalty to us or our
stockholders;
|
|
|
any act or omission not in good faith or that involves
intentional misconduct or a knowing violation of law;
|
|
|
voting or assenting to any unlawful payments related to
dividends or unlawful stock repurchases, redemptions or other
distributions; or
|
|
|
any transaction from which the director derived an improper
personal benefit.
|
These limitations do not apply to liabilities arising under
federal securities laws and do not affect the availability of
equitable remedies, including injunctive relief or rescission.
If Delaware law is amended to authorize the further elimination
or limitation of liability of a director, then
131
the liability of our directors will be eliminated or limited to
the fullest extent permitted by Delaware law as so amended.
As permitted by Delaware law, our certificate of incorporation
also provides that:
|
|
|
we will indemnify our directors and officers to the fullest
extent permitted by law;
|
|
|
we may indemnify our other employees and other agents to the
same extent that we indemnify our officers and directors, unless
otherwise determined by the board of directors; and
|
|
|
we will advance expenses to our directors and executive officers
in connection with legal proceedings in connection with a legal
proceeding to the fullest extent permitted by law.
|
The indemnification provisions contained in our certificate of
incorporation are not exclusive.
In addition to the indemnification provided for in our
certificate of incorporation, we have entered into
indemnification agreements with each of our directors. Each
indemnification agreement provides that we will indemnify the
director to the fullest extent permitted by law for claims
arising in his capacity as our director provided that he acted
in good faith and in a manner that he reasonably believed to be
in, or not opposed to, our best interests and, with respect to
any criminal proceeding, had no reasonable cause to believe that
his conduct was unlawful. In the event that we do not assume the
defense of a claim against a director, we are required to
advance his expenses in connection with his defense, provided
that he undertakes to repay all amounts advanced if it is
ultimately determined that he is not entitled to be indemnified
by us.
We believe that these provisions and agreements are necessary to
attract and retain qualified persons as directors. Insofar as
indemnification for liabilities arising under the Securities Act
may be permitted to directors, officers or persons controlling
our company pursuant to the foregoing provisions, the opinion of
the Securities and Exchange Commission is that such
indemnification is against public policy as expressed in the
Securities Act and is therefore unenforceable.
In addition, we maintain standard policies of insurance under
which coverage is provided to our directors and officers against
losses rising from claims made by reason of breach of duty or
other wrongful act, and to us with respect to payments which may
be made by us to such directors and officers pursuant to the
above indemnification provisions or otherwise as a matter of law.
132
Certain
relationships and related transactions
Management
agreement
TC Group, L.L.C. (an affiliate of Carlyle), Mr. Stone and
SS&C Holdings entered into a management agreement on
November 23, 2005, pursuant to which SS&C Holdings
paid (1) TC Group, L.L.C. a fee of $5,233,516 for certain
services provided by it to SS&C Holdings in connection with
the Transaction and the financing of the Transaction and
(2) Mr. Stone a fee of $2,266,484 in consideration of
his commitment to contribute SS&C equity to SS&C
Holdings pursuant to the contribution and subscription agreement
between Mr. Stone and SS&C Holdings and as
consideration for Mr. Stones agreement to enter into
a long-term employment agreement with SS&C Holdings,
including the non-competition provisions therein. The aggregate
amount of these fees was allocated to Mr. Stone and TC
Group, L.L.C. pro rata based on their respective ownership of
SS&C Holdings following the consummation of the
Transaction. SS&C Holdings also agreed to pay to TC Group,
L.L.C. (1) an annual fee of $1.0 million for certain
management services to be performed by it for SS&C Holdings
following consummation of the Transaction and to reimburse TC
Group, L.L.C. for certain out-of pocket expenses incurred in
connection with the performance of such services and
(2) additional reasonable compensation for other services
provided by TC Group, L.L.C. to SS&C Holdings from time to
time, including investment banking, financial advisory and other
services with respect to acquisitions and divestitures by
SS&C Holdings or sales of equity or debt interests of
SS&C Holdings or any of its affiliates. The management
agreement, which was amended in April 2008, terminated upon
completion of our IPO.
Contribution and
subscription agreement
On July 28, 2005, Mr. Stone and SS&C Holdings
entered into a contribution and subscription agreement, which
provided that, immediately prior to the closing date of the
Transaction, Mr. Stone would contribute to SS&C
Holdings 4,026,845 shares of SS&C common stock held by
him in exchange for the issuance by SS&C Holdings to
Mr. Stone of newly issued shares of common stock of
SS&C Holdings, representing approximately 28% of the
outstanding equity of SS&C Holdings. Mr. Stone and
SS&C Holdings subsequently reached an understanding to
allow Mr. Stone to reduce the number of shares of SS&C
common stock that he would contribute to SS&C Holdings
pursuant to the contribution and subscription agreement to
3,921,958 shares, with a value of approximately
$146.1 million based on a per-share value of $37.25
(without giving effect to the 8.5-for-1 stock split of our
common stock that was effected on March 10, 2010).
Mr. Stone also agreed not to exercise any of his
outstanding options to purchase SS&C common stock.
Accordingly, pursuant to the merger agreement for the
Acquisition, these options became vested and immediately
exercisable on the closing date of the Transaction and were
assumed by SS&C Holdings and converted into options to
acquire common stock of SS&C Holdings. The value of these
assumed options was approximately $18.9 million (calculated
by multiplying the number of shares subject to each option by
the amount, if any, by which $37.25 exceeded the exercise price
of the options). The aggregate value of his contributed shares
and options was $165.0 million and represented
approximately 28% of the fully diluted outstanding equity of
SS&C Holdings, after giving effect to the anticipated
equity contributions by Carlyle.
Stockholders
agreement
On November 23, 2005, Mr. Stone became a party to a
stockholders agreement with SS&C Holdings, Carlyle Partners
IV, L.P. and CP IV Coinvestment, L.P., which includes
restrictions on
133
transfer as well as other provisions described below. The
parties amended certain provisions of the stockholders agreement
in April 2008 and March 2010.
Board of directors. Pursuant to the stockholders
agreement our board of directors consists of seven members, with
Mr. Stone occupying one seat and having the right to
designate one of the remaining board members, with the
stockholders affiliated with Carlyle having the right to
designate four of the remaining board members, and with
Mr. Stone and the stockholders affiliated with Carlyle
collectively having the right to designate the remaining board
member. Accordingly, Mr. Stone designated Normand A.
Boulanger, and the stockholders affiliated with Carlyle
designated Campbell R. Dyer, William A. Etherington, Allan
M. Holt and Claudius E. Watts, IV as members of our board of
directors. Mr. Stone and the stockholders affiliated with
Carlyle designated Jonathan E. Michael as the seventh member of
our board of directors. The number of board members which
Carlyle is entitled to designate will be reduced (1) to
three directors if the Carlyle holders hold less than 40% of our
common stock, (2) to two directors if the Carlyle holders
hold less than 30% of our common stock, and (3) to one
director if the Carlyle holders hold less than 15% of our common
stock. The number of board members which Mr. Stone is
entitled to designate (including himself) will be reduced to one
director if Mr. Stone holds less than 15% of our common
stock. The Carlyle holders rights under the board of
directors designation provisions of the stockholders agreement
will terminate at such time as they hold less than 10% of our
common stock. Mr. Stones rights under the board of
directors designation provisions of the stockholders agreement
will terminate at such time as he holds less than 10% of our
common stock.
Bring-along rights. If any party to the stockholders
agreement proposes to transfer 50% or more of all common stock
held by the parties to the agreement to a third-party purchaser,
then such transferring stockholder can require the other
stockholders who are parties to the agreement to transfer their
common stock on the same terms and conditions as the
transferring holder.
Other rights. The stockholders agreement also
contained certain tag-along and preemptive rights which
terminated upon completion of our IPO.
Service provider
stockholders agreement
On November 23, 2005, all of our members of management
(other than Mr. Stone) and all employee option holders
whose SS&C options were converted into options to acquire
common stock of SS&C Holdings became parties to a service
provider stockholders agreement with Carlyle Partners IV, L.P.,
CP IV Coinvestment, L.P. and SS&C Holdings. In addition,
substantially all holders of options to purchase common stock of
SS&C Holdings have subsequently become parties to the
agreement. SS&C Holdings and the Carlyle stockholders
amended certain provisions of the service provider stockholders
agreement in April 2008. Under the agreement, if the
Carlyle holders propose to transfer 50% or more of our
outstanding common stock to a third-party purchaser, then the
Carlyle holders can require the members of our management and
employee option holders who are parties to the agreement to
transfer their common stock and options on the same terms and
conditions as the Carlyle holders (bring-along rights).
Registration
rights agreement
On November 23, 2005, Mr. Stone became a party to a
registration rights agreement with SS&C Holdings, Carlyle
Partners IV, L.P. and CP IV Coinvestment, L.P., which provides
for certain registration rights. Under the registration rights
agreement, either the Carlyle holders or
134
Mr. Stone can demand that we file a registration statement
for all or a portion of their common stock. The Carlyle holders
and Mr. Stone are also entitled to request that their
shares be covered by a registration statement that we are
otherwise filing with respect to common stock. These
registration rights are subject to conditions and limitations,
including the right of the underwriters of an offering to limit
the number of shares included in certain registrations. For
additional detail, see Description of capital
stockRegistration rights.
Management rights
agreement
Carlyle Partners IV, L.P., CP IV Coinvestment, L.P., SS&C
Holdings and SS&C entered into a management rights
agreement on November 23, 2005, pursuant to which Carlyle
Partners IV, L.P. was granted (1) the right to nominate one
director to serve as a member of the board of directors of
SS&C Holdings and to appoint one non-voting board observer
to the board of directors of SS&C, (2) reasonable
access to the books and records of SS&C Holdings and
SS&C and their subsidiaries and (3) the right to
consult from time to time with the management of SS&C
Holdings and SS&C and their subsidiaries at their
respective place of business regarding operating and financial
matters. The management rights agreement will terminate with
respect to SS&C when SS&C Holdings and its affiliates
no longer beneficially own any voting securities of SS&C.
The management rights agreement will terminate with respect to
SS&C Holdings when Carlyle Partners IV, L.P. and its
affiliates no longer beneficially own any voting securities of
SS&C Holdings.
Fund administration
services agreement
On August 12, 2008, Walkers SPV Limited acting solely in
its capacity as trustee of the Carlyle Series Trust and its
classes or
sub-trusts,
Carlyle Loan Investment Ltd., CLP Cayman Holdco, Ltd., CCPMF
Cayman Holdco, Carlyle Credit Partners Financing I, Ltd.
(collectively, the Funds) and Carlyle Investment
Management L.L.C. entered into a fund administration services
agreement with SS&C. Pursuant to the agreement, the Funds
appointed SS&C to act as administrator, registrar and
transfer agent and to provide the Funds with certain fund
administration services, including daily processing and
reconciliation services, fund accounting services and unitholder
services, and such ancillary services as are set forth in work
requests that may be executed by the parties from time to time.
The agreement became effective on July 1, 2008 and
continued until December 31, 2010. The parties intend to
extend the agreement and are continuing to operate under the
terms of the agreement until an addendum is agreed upon.
SS&C is paid a monthly charge based on annual rates derived
from the net asset value of the Funds, subject to a minimum
monthly fee. SS&C also receives certain hourly and other
fees for any ancillary services that it provides under the
agreement. Through December 31, 2010, the Funds paid an
aggregate of $1,223,708 to us under the agreement.
Processing
services agreement
On June 22, 2009, Carlyle Investment Management L.L.C.
entered into a processing services agreement with SS&C.
Pursuant to the agreement, SS&C provides investment
accounting and data processing services. The agreement continues
until June 22, 2011. SS&C will be paid a monthly
charge based on annual rates derived from the net asset value of
Carlyle Investment Management L.L.C., subject to a minimum
monthly fee. SS&C will also receive other fees for certain
ancillary services that it provides under the agreement. Through
December 31, 2010, Carlyle Investment Management L.L.C.
paid an aggregate of $494,783 to us under the agreement.
135
Acquisition of
Tradeware
On December 31, 2009, SS&C acquired Tradeware Global
Corp. through the merger of TG Acquisition Corp., a wholly-owned
subsidiary of SS&C, with and into Tradeware, with Tradeware
being the surviving company and a wholly-owned subsidiary of
SS&C. At the closing of the Tradeware merger, SS&C
(among other things) (i) paid an aggregate of approximately
$21,500,000 to the former holders of Tradeware stock and options
in exchange for their shares and options and (ii) deposited
$1,000,000 into an escrow fund to secure certain obligations of
former Tradeware common stock and option holders. Two former
holders of Tradeware common stock, Carlyle Europe Venture
Partners, L.P. (CEVP, L.P.) and CEVP Co-Investment,
L.P. (CEVP Co-Investment), are investment funds
affiliated with Carlyle. At the closing of the Tradeware Merger,
CEVP, L.P. and CEVP Co-Investment received payments from
SS&C of approximately $461,894 and $16,855, respectively,
in exchange for their shares of Tradeware common stock.
CEVP, L.P. and CEVP Co-Investment are eligible to
receive up to approximately $36,740 and $1,341, respectively, in
connection with the release of funds from escrow, if any.
Other
transactions
John Stone, the brother of William C. Stone, is employed by
SS&C as Vice President of Sales Management. In 2008, 2009
and 2010, John Stone was paid $142,000, $150,300 and $136,475,
respectively, as salary and commissions related to his
employment at SS&C.
Indemnification
agreements
Our certificate of incorporation provides that we will indemnify
our directors to the fullest extent permitted by Delaware law.
In addition, we have entered into indemnification agreements
with each of our directors that may be broader in scope than the
specific indemnification provisions contained in the Delaware
General Corporation Law. For more information regarding these
agreements, see ManagementLimitation of liability
and indemnification.
Review, approval
or ratification of transactions with related persons
Our board of directors has adopted written policies and
procedures for the review of any transaction, arrangement or
relationship in which we are a participant, the amount involved
exceeds $120,000, and one of our executive officers, directors,
director nominees or 5% stockholders (or their immediate family
members), each of whom we refer to as a related
person, has a direct or indirect material interest.
If a related person proposes to enter into such a transaction,
arrangement or relationship, which we refer to as a
related person transaction, the related person must
report the proposed related person transaction to our general
counsel. The policy calls for the proposed related person
transaction to be reviewed and, if deemed appropriate, approved
by our boards audit committee. Whenever practicable, the
reporting, review and approval will occur prior to entry into
the transaction. If advance review and approval is not
practicable, the committee will review, and, in its discretion,
may ratify the related person transaction. The policy also
permits the chairman of the committee to review and, if deemed
appropriate, approve proposed related person transactions that
arise between committee meetings, subject to ratification by the
committee at its next meeting. Any related person transactions
that are ongoing in nature will be reviewed annually.
136
A related person transaction reviewed under the policy will be
considered approved or ratified if it is authorized by the
committee after full disclosure of the related persons
interest in the transaction. As appropriate for the
circumstances, the committee will review and consider:
|
|
|
the related persons interest in the related person
transaction;
|
|
|
the approximate dollar value of the amount involved in the
related person transaction;
|
|
|
the approximate dollar value of the amount of the related
persons interest in the transaction without regard to the
amount of any profit or loss;
|
|
|
whether the transaction was undertaken in the ordinary course of
our business;
|
|
|
whether the terms of the transaction are no less favorable to us
than terms that could have been reached with an unrelated third
party;
|
|
|
the purpose of, and the potential benefits to us of, the
transaction; and
|
|
|
any other information regarding the related person transaction
or the related person in the context of the proposed transaction
that would be material to investors in light of the
circumstances of the particular transaction.
|
The committee may approve or ratify the transaction only if the
committee determines that, under all of the circumstances, the
transaction is in, or is not inconsistent with, our best
interests. The committee may impose any conditions on the
related person transaction that it deems appropriate.
In addition to the transactions that are excluded by the
instructions to the Securities and Exchange Commissions
related person transaction disclosure rule, our board has
determined that the following transactions do not create a
material direct or indirect interest on behalf of related
persons and, therefore, are not related person transactions for
purposes of this policy:
|
|
|
interests arising solely from the related persons position
as an executive officer of another entity (whether or not the
person is also a director of such entity), that is a participant
in the transaction, where (a) the related person and all
other related persons own in the aggregate less than a 10%
equity interest in such entity and (b) the related person
and his or her immediate family members are not involved in the
negotiation of the terms of the transaction and do not receive
any special benefits as a result of the transaction, and
(c) the amount involved in the transaction equals less than
the greater of $200,000 or 5% of the annual gross revenues of
the company receiving payment under the transaction; and
|
|
|
a transaction that is specifically contemplated by provisions of
our charter or bylaws.
|
The policy provides that transactions involving compensation of
executive officers shall be reviewed and approved by the
compensation committee in the manner specified in its charter.
137
Executive
compensation and stock option awards
Please see Management for information on the
compensation of, and stock options granted to, our directors and
executive officers.
Employment
agreements
We have entered into an employment agreement with Mr. Stone
as described in ManagementEmployment and related
agreements.
138
Principal and
selling stockholders
This table presents information concerning the beneficial
ownership of the shares of our common stock as of
December 31, 2010. The table also contains information
about beneficial ownership, as adjusted to reflect the sale of
common stock in this offering, assuming 73,272,612 shares
of common stock are outstanding as of December 31, 2010
(which includes 480,100 shares to be sold by selling
stockholders upon the exercise of outstanding options in
connection with this offering) and 75,272,612 shares are
outstanding immediately following the completion of this
offering.
Specifically, the table reflects beneficial ownership
information about:
|
|
|
each person we know to be the beneficial owner of more than 5%
of the outstanding shares of common stock;
|
|
|
each of our directors and named executive officers;
|
|
|
all of our directors and executive officers as a group; and
|
|
|
each of our other selling stockholders.
|
Beneficial ownership is determined under the rules of the
Securities and Exchange Commission and generally includes voting
or investment power over securities. Except in cases where
community property laws apply or as indicated in the footnotes
to this table, we believe that each stockholder identified in
the table possesses sole voting and investment power over all
shares of common stock shown as beneficially owned by the
stockholder. Shares of common stock subject to options that are
exercisable or exercisable within 60 days of
December 31, 2010 are considered outstanding and
beneficially owned by the person holding the options for the
purpose of computing the percentage ownership of that person but
are not treated as outstanding for the purpose of computing the
percentage ownership of any other person.
The information in the table below with respect to each selling
stockholder has been obtained from that selling stockholder.
When we refer to the selling stockholders in this
prospectus, we mean those persons listed in the table below as
offering shares, as well as the pledgees, donees, assignees,
transferees, successors and others who may hold any of the
selling stockholders interest.
See Certain relationships and related transactions
for a discussion of the material relationships between the
Company and investment funds associated with Carlyle.
Unless otherwise noted below, the address of the persons and
entities listed on the table is
c/o SS&C
Technologies Holdings, Inc., 80 Lamberton Road, Windsor, CT
06095.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares beneficially
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares beneficially
|
|
|
|
owned prior to the
|
|
|
|
|
|
owned after the
|
|
|
|
offering
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
offering
|
|
|
|
Number
|
|
|
Percent
|
|
|
Offered
|
|
|
Number
|
|
|
Percent
|
|
|
|
|
Beneficial Owner
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5% Stockholders:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TCG Holdings, L.L.C.(1)
|
|
|
43,469,799
|
|
|
|
59.8%
|
|
|
|
8,000,000
|
|
|
|
35,469,799
|
|
|
|
47.1%
|
|
William C. Stone(2)
|
|
|
18,827,927
|
|
|
|
24.6%
|
|
|
|
519,900
|
|
|
|
18,308,027
|
|
|
|
23.3%
|
|
139
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares beneficially
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares beneficially
|
|
|
|
owned prior to the
|
|
|
|
|
|
owned after the
|
|
|
|
offering
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
offering
|
|
|
|
Number
|
|
|
Percent
|
|
|
Offered
|
|
|
Number
|
|
|
Percent
|
|
|
|
|
Other Directors and Named Executive Officers:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Normand A. Boulanger(3)
|
|
|
1,301,617
|
|
|
|
1.8%
|
|
|
|
256,000
|
|
|
|
1,045,617
|
|
|
|
1.4%
|
|
William A. Etherington(4)
|
|
|
31,250
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31,250
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
Allan M. Holt(5)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Campbell R. Dyer(5)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Claudius (Bud) E. Watts IV(5)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Patrick J. Pedonti(6)
|
|
|
588,825
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
110,000
|
|
|
|
478,825
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
Stephen V. R. Whitman(7)
|
|
|
289,456
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
55,800
|
|
|
|
233,656
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
Jonathan E. Michael(8)
|
|
|
31,250
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31,250
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
All directors and executive officers as a group
(9 persons)(9)
|
|
|
21,070,325
|
|
|
|
26.8%
|
|
|
|
941,700
|
|
|
|
20,128,625
|
|
|
|
24.9%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other Selling Stockholders:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rahul Kanwar(10)
|
|
|
191,518
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
38,300
|
|
|
|
153,218
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
Matthew Moffat(11)
|
|
|
57,374
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
11,000
|
|
|
|
46,374
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
Walid Nassereddine(12)
|
|
|
45,049
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
9,000
|
|
|
|
36,049
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
Represents less than one percent of
the outstanding shares of common stock.
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
TC Group IV, L.P. is the sole
general partner of Carlyle Partners IV, L.P. and CP IV
Coinvestment, L.P., the record holders of 41,782,345 and
1,687,454 shares of our common stock, respectively. TC
Group IV Managing GP, L.L.C. is the sole general partner of
TC Group IV, L.P. TC Group, L.L.C. is the sole managing member
of TC Group IV Managing GP, L.L.C. TCG Holdings, L.L.C. is
the sole managing member of TC Group, L.L.C. Accordingly, TC
Group IV, L.P., TC Group IV Managing GP, L.L.C., TC Group,
L.L.C. and TCG Holdings, L.L.C. each may be deemed owners of
shares of our common stock owned of record by each of Carlyle
Partners IV, L.P. and CP IV Coinvestment, L.P. William E.
Conway, Jr., Daniel A. DAniello and David M. Rubenstein
are managing members of TCG Holdings, L.L.C. and, in such
capacity, may be deemed to share beneficial ownership of shares
of our common stock beneficially owned by TCG Holdings, L.L.C.
Such individuals expressly disclaim any such beneficial
ownership. The principal address and principal offices of TCG
Holdings, L.L.C. and certain affiliates is
c/o The
Carlyle Group, 1001 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W., Suite 220
South, Washington, D.C.
20004-2505.
|
|
(2)
|
|
Includes 3,302,092 shares of
our common stock subject to outstanding stock options
exercisable on or within the
60-day
period following December 31, 2010, and 153,846 unvested
shares of our Class A non-voting common stock.
|
|
(3)
|
|
Consists of 1,301,617 shares
of our common stock subject to outstanding stock options
exercisable on or within the
60-day
period following December 31, 2010.
|
|
(4)
|
|
Includes 21,250 shares of our
common stock subject to outstanding stock options exercisable on
or within the
60-day
period following December 31, 2010.
|
|
(5)
|
|
Does not include
43,469,799 shares of our common stock held by investment
funds associated with or designated by Carlyle.
Messrs. Holt, Watts and Dyer are executives of Carlyle.
They disclaim beneficial ownership of the shares held by
investment funds associated with or designated by Carlyle.
|
|
(6)
|
|
Consists of 588,825 shares of
our common stock subject to outstanding stock options
exercisable on or within the
60-day
period following December 31, 2010.
|
|
(7)
|
|
Consists of 289,456 shares of
our common stock subject to outstanding stock options
exercisable on or within the
60-day
period following December 31, 2010.
|
|
(8)
|
|
Includes 21,250 shares of our
common stock subject to outstanding options exercisable on or
within the
60-day
period following December 31, 2010.
|
|
(9)
|
|
Includes 5,524,490 shares of
our common stock subject to outstanding stock options
exercisable on or within the
60-day
period following December 31, 2010.
|
|
(10)
|
|
Consists of 191,518 shares of
our common stock subject to outstanding stock options
exercisable on or within the
60-day
period following December 31, 2010. Mr. Kanwar is one
of our employees.
|
|
(11)
|
|
Consists of 57,374 shares of
our common stock subject to outstanding stock options
exercisable on or within the
60-day
period following December 31, 2010. Mr. Moffat is one
of our employees.
|
|
(12)
|
|
Consists of 45,049 shares of
our common stock subject to outstanding stock options
exercisable on or within the
60-day
period following December 31, 2010. Mr. Nassereddine
is one of our employees.
|
140
Description of
certain indebtedness
Senior credit
facilities
Overview
In connection with the Transaction, we entered into our senior
credit facilities with J.P. Morgan Securities Inc. and
Wachovia Capital Markets, LLC as co-lead arrangers and joint
bookrunners, JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. as administrative agent,
Wachovia Bank, National Association as syndication agent and
Bank of America, N.A. as documentation agent.
The senior credit facilities consist of a revolving credit
facility and term loan facility. The term loan facility has a
principal amount of $275.0 million, of which the equivalent
of $75.0 million ($17.0 million of which is
denominated in U.S. dollars and $58.0 million of which
is denominated in Canadian dollars) was drawn by SS&C
Technologies Canada Corp., one of our Canadian subsidiaries as
the Canadian borrower, on the closing date of the Transaction.
The revolving credit facility has a principal amount of
$75.0 million, of which $10.0 million was drawn on the
closing date of the Transaction to pay a portion of the costs
associated with the Transaction. The remainder is available for
general corporate purposes, subject to certain conditions. In
addition, the equivalent of up to $10.0 million of the
revolving credit facility may be drawn in Canadian dollars
either by us or the Canadian borrower. Our ability to draw under
the revolving credit facility is conditioned upon, among other
things, our continued compliance with covenants in the credit
agreement, our ability to bring down the representations and
warranties contained in the credit agreement and the absence of
any default or event of default under the senior credit
facilities.
Our revolving credit facility will mature on November 23,
2011, and the term loan facility will mature on
November 23, 2012.
The term loan facility amortizes in nominal quarterly
installments of 0.25% (initially $2.5 million per year)
beginning on March 31, 2006 until maturity, whereby the
final installment of the term loan facility will be paid on the
maturity date in an amount equal to the aggregate unpaid
principal amount.
In addition to the revolving credit facility and term loan
facility described above, our senior credit facilities permit
SS&C or the Canadian borrower to incur up to
$100.0 million in total principal amount of additional term
loan indebtedness, subject to certain exceptions.
Guarantees;
security
The obligations under the senior credit facilities are secured
and fully and unconditionally guaranteed jointly and severally
by us and each of our material wholly-owned
U.S. subsidiaries currently existing or that we may create
or acquire, with certain exceptions as set forth in our credit
agreement, pursuant to the terms of a separate guarantee and
collateral agreement. The obligations of the Canadian borrower
are secured and fully and unconditionally guaranteed jointly and
severally by us and SS&C and each of its material wholly
owned U.S. and Canadian subsidiaries currently existing or
that we may create or acquire, with certain exceptions as set
forth in our credit agreement, pursuant to the terms of a
separate guarantee and collateral agreement.
141
Borrowings under the senior credit facilities, all guarantees
thereof and SS&Cs obligations under related hedging
agreements are secured by a perfected first priority security
interest in: (1) all of SS&Cs capital stock and
all of the capital stock or other equity interests held by
SS&C, us and each of our existing and future
U.S. subsidiary guarantors (subject to certain limitations
for equity interests of foreign subsidiaries and other
exceptions as set forth in the credit agreement); and
(2) all of SS&Cs and our tangible and intangible
assets and the tangible and intangible assets of each of our
existing and future U.S. subsidiary guarantors, with
certain exceptions as set forth in the credit agreement.
The Canadian borrowers borrowings under the senior credit
facilities and all guarantees thereof are secured by a perfected
first priority security interest in: (1) all of
SS&Cs capital stock and all of the capital stock or
other equity interests held by SS&C, us and each of our
existing and future U.S. and Canadian subsidiary
guarantors, with certain exceptions as set forth in the credit
agreement; and (2) all of SS&Cs and our tangible
and intangible assets and the tangible and intangible assets of
each of our existing and future U.S. and Canadian
subsidiary guarantors, with certain exceptions as set forth in
the credit agreement.
Interest rates
and fees
Borrowings under the senior credit facilities that are
denominated in U.S. dollars bear interest at a rate equal
to the applicable margin plus, at our option, either: (1) a
base rate determined by reference to the higher of
(a) JPMorgan Chase Banks prime rate and (b) the
federal funds rate plus 1/2 of 1%; or (2) a Eurocurrency
rate on deposits in U.S. dollars for one-, two-, three- or
six-month periods (or nine- or twelve-month periods if, at the
time of the borrowing, all lenders agree to make such a duration
available). Borrowings under the revolving credit facility that
are denominated in Canadian dollars bear interest at the rate
equal to the applicable margin plus a Eurocurrency rate on
deposits in Canadian dollars for one-, two-, three- or six-month
periods (or nine- or twelve-month periods if, at the time of the
borrowing, all lenders agree to make such a duration available).
Borrowings by the Canadian borrower that are denominated in
Canadian dollars bear interest at a rate equal to the applicable
margin plus, at the Canadian borrowers option, either at
the Canadian dollar prime rate or the applicable bankers
acceptances discount rate. Borrowings by the Canadian borrower
that are denominated in U.S. dollars bear interest at the
rate equal to the applicable margin plus, at the Canadian
borrowers option, either (1) a base rate determined
by reference to the higher of (a) a reference rate for
determining interest rates on commercial loans denominated in
U.S. dollars and (b) the federal funds rate plus 1/2
of 1%; or (2) a Eurocurrency rate on deposits in
U.S. dollars for one-, two-, three- or six-month periods
(or nine-or twelve-month periods if, at the time of the
borrowing, all lenders agree to make such a duration available).
The applicable margin is subject to change depending on
SS&Cs leverage ratio. We will also pay the lenders a
commitment fee on the unused commitments under the revolving
credit facility, which is payable quarterly in arrears. The
commitment fee is subject to change depending on our leverage
ratio.
Mandatory and
optional repayment
Subject to exceptions for reinvestment of proceeds and other
exceptions and materiality thresholds, we are required to prepay
outstanding loans under the senior credit facilities with
142
the net proceeds of certain asset dispositions, near-term tax
refunds in certain circumstances and the incurrence of certain
debt, and 50% of SS&Cs excess cash flow, subject to
reduction to 25% and to 0% if certain leverage ratios are met.
We may voluntarily prepay loans or reduce commitments under the
senior credit facilities, in whole or in part, subject to
minimum amounts. If we prepay Eurocurrency rate loans other than
at the end of an applicable interest period, we are required to
reimburse lenders for their losses or expenses sustained as a
result of such prepayment.
Covenants
The senior credit facilities contain negative and affirmative
covenants affecting SS&C and its existing and future
restricted subsidiaries, with certain exceptions set forth in
the credit agreement. The senior credit facilities contain the
following negative covenants and restrictions on, among others,
the following:
|
|
|
liens;
|
|
|
sale-leaseback transactions;
|
|
|
debt;
|
|
|
dividends and other restricted payments;
|
|
|
redemptions and stock repurchases;
|
|
|
consolidations, mergers and acquisitions;
|
|
|
asset dispositions;
|
|
|
investments, loans and advances;
|
|
|
changes in line of business;
|
|
|
changes in fiscal year;
|
|
|
restrictive agreements with subsidiaries;
|
|
|
transactions with affiliates;
|
|
|
amendments or prepayments of subordinated indebtedness; and
|
|
|
speculative hedging agreements.
|
The senior credit facilities also require SS&C, and require
its existing and future restricted subsidiaries, with certain
exceptions set forth in the credit agreement, to meet certain
financial covenants and ratios, particularly a leverage ratio
and an interest coverage ratio.
The senior credit facilities contain the following affirmative
covenants, among others:
|
|
|
delivery of financial and other information to the
administrative agent;
|
|
|
notice to the administrative agent upon the occurrence of
certain events of default, litigation and other material events;
|
|
|
conduct of business and maintenance of existence;
|
|
|
payment of material taxes and other governmental charges;
|
|
|
maintenance of properties, licenses and insurance;
|
|
|
access to books and records by the lenders;
|
143
|
|
|
compliance with applicable laws and regulations; and
|
|
|
further assurances and maintenance of collateral.
|
Events of
default
The senior credit facilities specify certain events of default,
including, among others: failure to pay principal, interest or
fees, violation of covenants, material inaccuracy of
representations and warranties, cross-defaults to material
indebtedness, certain bankruptcy and insolvency events, certain
material judgments, certain ERISA events, invalidity or
subordination provisions, change of control and invalidity of
guarantees or security documents.
113/4% senior
subordinated notes due 2013
Overview
In November 2005, SS&C issued $205.0 million in
aggregate principal amount of
113/4% Senior
Subordinated Notes due 2013 pursuant to the terms of an
indenture with Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as
trustee. In May 2010, using proceeds from our IPO,
SS&C redeemed $71.75 million in principal amount of
the
113/4%
Senior Subordinated Notes due 2013 at a redemption price of
105.875% of the principal amount, plus accrued and unpaid
interest on such amount to, but excluding, the date of
redemption.
Guarantees and
ranking
The notes are general unsecured senior subordinated obligations
of SS&C that are subordinated in right of payment to all
existing and future senior debt of SS&C, including the
senior credit facilities. The notes are pari passu in
right of payment to all future senior subordinated debt of
SS&C. The notes are jointly and severally guaranteed on a
senior subordinated basis by all existing and future direct and
indirect domestic subsidiaries of SS&C that guarantee the
obligations under the senior credit facilities or any of
SS&Cs other indebtedness or the indebtedness of the
guarantors.
Maturity and
interest
The notes mature on December 1, 2013. Interest on the notes
accrues at the rate of 11.75% per annum and is payable
semi-annually in arrears on June 1 and December 1 of each year.
Optional
redemption
The notes are redeemable, at SS&Cs option, in whole
or in part, at any time on or after December 1, 2009 and
prior to maturity at the applicable redemption prices set forth
below (expressed as a percentage of principal amount), plus
accrued and unpaid interest and liquidated damages, if any, to
the relevant redemption date. Such redemption prices are set
144
forth below, in each case if redeemed during the
12-month
period commencing on December 1 of the applicable year:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Redemption Period
|
|
Price
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
105.8750%
|
|
2010
|
|
|
102.9375%
|
|
2011 and thereafter
|
|
|
100.0%
|
|
|
|
Change of
control
Upon a change of control, we are required to make an offer to
redeem all of the notes at a redemption price equal to 101% of
the aggregate principal amount thereof plus accrued and unpaid
interest and liquidated damages, if any, to the date of
repurchase.
Covenants
The indenture governing the notes contains covenants limiting,
among other things, SS&Cs ability and the ability of
its restricted subsidiaries to:
|
|
|
incur additional indebtedness;
|
|
|
sell assets, including capital stock of restricted subsidiaries;
|
|
|
agree to payment restrictions affecting SS&Cs
restricted subsidiaries;
|
|
|
pay dividends;
|
|
|
make certain investments;
|
|
|
consolidate, merge, sell or otherwise dispose of all or
substantially all of SS&Cs assets;
|
|
|
enter into transactions with SS&Cs affiliates;
|
|
|
incur liens; and
|
|
|
designate any of SS&Cs subsidiaries as unrestricted
subsidiaries.
|
The restrictive covenants in the indenture permit SS&C to
pay dividends to us in an amount not to exceed in any fiscal
year 6% of the net proceeds received by SS&C through a
contribution to equity capital from such offering to enable us
to pay dividends to our stockholders.
Events of
default
The indenture governing the notes provides for customary events
of default, including, among others: failure to pay principal,
interest, fees or liquidated damages, violation of covenants,
cross-defaults to material indebtedness, certain material
judgments, invalidity of guarantees, and certain bankruptcy and
insolvency events.
145
Description of
capital stock
General
Our authorized capital stock consists of 100,000,000 shares
of common stock, par value $0.01 per share,
5,000,000 shares of Class A non-voting common stock,
par value $0.01 per share, and 5,000,000 shares of
preferred stock, par value $0.01 per share, all of which
preferred stock is undesignated. The following description of
our capital stock and the provisions of our certificate of
incorporation and bylaws are summaries and are qualified by
reference to our certificate of incorporation and bylaws.
Common
stock
As of December 31, 2010, there were 72,792,512 shares
of our common stock outstanding and held of record by
24 stockholders, including 791,346 shares of our
Class A non-voting common stock outstanding and held of
record by one stockholder.
Holders of our common stock, other than holders of our
Class A non-voting common stock, are entitled to one vote
for each share held on all matters submitted to a vote of
stockholders and do not have cumulative voting rights. An
election of directors by our stockholders shall be determined by
a plurality of the votes cast by the stockholders entitled to
vote on the election. Class A non-voting common stock shall
not be entitled to vote except as otherwise specifically
required by law. Holders of common stock are entitled to receive
proportionately any dividends as may be declared by our board of
directors, subject to any preferential dividend rights of any
series of preferred stock that we may designate and issue in the
future.
In the event of our liquidation or dissolution, the holders of
common stock are entitled to receive proportionately our net
assets available for distribution to stockholders after the
payment of all debts and other liabilities and subject to the
prior rights of any outstanding preferred stock. Holders of
common stock have no preemptive, subscription, redemption or
conversion rights. Our outstanding shares of common stock are,
and the shares offered by us in this offering will be, when
issued and paid for, validly issued, fully paid and
nonassessable. The rights, preferences and privileges of holders
of common stock are subject to and may be adversely affected by
the rights of the holders of shares of any series of preferred
stock that we may designate and issue in the future.
Each share of Class A non-voting common stock will automatically
convert into one share of common stock upon (i) the expiration,
with respect to the holder of Class A
non-voting
common stock, of the applicable waiting period under the
Hart-Scott-Rodino Antitrust Improvements Act of 1976, or the HSR
Act, such that such holder could acquire shares of common stock
issuable upon conversion of such holders shares of Class A
non-voting common stock in compliance with the HSR Act, (ii) any
other event, the occurrence of which results in the ability of a
holder of Class A non-voting common stock to acquire the shares
of common stock issuable upon conversion of the Class A
non-voting
common stock in compliance with the HSR Act or (iii) the sale,
assignment, transfer or other disposition of such share of Class
A non-voting common stock to a person or entity that would not
be required to make a filing under the HSR Act to acquire an
equal number of shares of common stock or for which the waiting
period under the HSR Act applicable to such person acquiring an
equal number of shares of common stock has expired.
146
Preferred
stock
Under the terms of our certificate of incorporation, our board
of directors is authorized to direct us to issue shares of
preferred stock in one or more series without stockholder
approval. Our board of directors has the discretion to determine
the rights, preferences, privileges and restrictions, including
voting rights, dividend rights, conversion rights, redemption
privileges and liquidation preferences, of each series of
preferred stock.
The purpose of authorizing our board of directors to issue
preferred stock and determine its rights and preferences is to
eliminate delays associated with a stockholder vote on specific
issuances. The issuance of preferred stock, while providing
flexibility in connection with possible acquisitions, future
financings and other corporate purposes, could have the effect
of making it more difficult for a third party to acquire, or
could discourage a third party from seeking to acquire, a
majority of our outstanding voting stock. Upon the closing of
this offering, there will be no shares of preferred stock
outstanding, and we have no present plans to issue any shares of
preferred stock.
Options
As of December 31, 2010, we had outstanding options to
purchase an aggregate of 12,182,192 shares of common stock
with a weighted-average exercise price of $8.51 per share,
which includes 480,100 shares to be sold by selling
stockholders upon the exercise of outstanding options in
connection with this offering.
Registration
rights
We entered into a registration rights agreement, dated as of
November 23, 2005, as amended, with Mr. Stone, Carlyle
Partners IV, L.P. and CP IV Coinvestment, L.P. Under the
registration rights agreement, certain holders of shares having
registration rights can demand that we file a registration
statement and all holders of shares having registration rights
can request that their shares be covered by a registration
statement that we are otherwise filing, as described below.
These registration rights are subject to conditions and
limitations, including the right of the underwriters of an
offering to limit the number of shares included in certain
registrations.
Demand Registration Rights. The holders of a
majority of the common stock held by the Carlyle holders or
Mr. Stone may request that we register all or a portion of
their common stock for sale under the Securities Act. We must
use our reasonable best efforts to effect the registration as
requested, subject to our right to postpone such registration if
we determine that such registration would be materially
detrimental to us or our stockholders or if our board of
directors determines in its good faith judgment that the
registration would have an adverse effect on a then contemplated
public offering of our common stock. A holders right to
demand registration of shares is subject to the right of the
underwriters to limit the number of shares included in the
offering. We are required to effect four of these registrations,
in the case of the Carlyle holders, and three of these
registrations, in the case of Mr. Stone. We are not
obligated to effect more than three of these registrations in
any year. No registration will count towards such numerical
limitations, however, if any shares of common stock requested to
be registered are cut back by the underwriters of an offering.
Neither the Carlyle holders nor Mr. Stone is entitled to
make a registration request if such holder owns less than 5% of
our common stock held collectively by the Carlyle holders and
Mr. Stone.
147
Piggy-back Registration Rights. In addition, if at
any time we register any shares of common stock, the holders of
all shares having registration rights are entitled to notice of
the registration and to include all or a portion of their common
stock in the registration. We must use our reasonable best
efforts to effect the registration as requested, unless we
determine for any reason not to proceed with the proposed
registration of the securities to be sold by us.
We will pay all registration expenses, other than underwriting
discounts and selling commissions, related to any demand or
piggyback registration, including the fees and expenses of one
counsel selected by the selling stockholders. The registration
rights agreement contains customary cross-indemnification
provisions, pursuant to which we are obligated to indemnify the
selling stockholders in the event of material misstatements or
omissions in the registration statement attributable to us, and
they are obligated to indemnify us for material misstatements or
omissions in the registration statement attributable to them.
Corporate
opportunities
Our certificate of incorporation provides that Carlyle Partners
IV, L.P., CP IV Coinvestment, L.P. and their respective
affiliates have no obligation to offer us an opportunity to
participate in business opportunities presented to such
investment funds affiliated with Carlyle or their respective
officers, directors, agents, stockholders, members, partners,
affiliates and subsidiaries even if the opportunity is one that
we might reasonably have pursued, and that neither such
investment funds affiliated with Carlyle nor their respective
officers, directors, agents, stockholders, members, partners,
affiliates or subsidiaries will be liable to us or our
stockholders for breach of any duty by reason of any such
activities unless, in the case of any person who is a director
or officer of our company, such business opportunity is offered
to such director or officer in writing solely in his or her
capacity as an officer or director of our company. Stockholders
will be deemed to have notice of and consented to this provision
of our certificate of incorporation.
Anti-takeover
provisions
Staggered Board. Our certificate of incorporation
and bylaws divide our board of directors into three classes with
staggered three-year terms. In addition, our certificate of
incorporation and bylaws provide that directors may be removed
only for cause and only by the affirmative vote of the holders
of at least two-thirds of the votes that all our stockholders
would be entitled to cast in an annual election of directors;
provided that for so long as any of our stockholders has a
contractual right with us to remove a director, such director
may be removed, with or without cause, by the holders that have
the contractual right to remove such director by the affirmative
vote of at least a majority of the votes that all such holders
would be entitled to cast in an annual election of directors.
Under our certificate of incorporation and bylaws, any vacancy
on our board of directors, including a vacancy resulting from an
enlargement of our board of directors, may be filled only by
vote of a majority of our directors then in office; provided
that for so long as any of our stockholders has a contractual
right with us to fill a specified vacancy in the board of
directors, such specified vacancy shall be filled by the holders
that have the contractual right to remove such director by the
affirmative vote of at least a majority of the votes that all
such holders would be entitled to cast in an annual election of
directors. The classification of our board of directors and the
limitations on the ability of our stockholders to remove
directors and fill vacancies could make it more difficult for a
third party to acquire, or discourage a third party from seeking
to acquire, control of our company.
148
Special Meeting of Stockholders; Advance Notice Requirements
for Stockholder Proposals and Director Nominations. Our
certificate of incorporation and bylaws provide that any action
required or permitted to be taken by our stockholders at an
annual meeting or special meeting of stockholders may only be
taken if it is properly brought before such meeting. Our
certificate of incorporation and bylaws also provide that,
except as otherwise required by law, special meetings of the
stockholders can only be called by our chairman of the board,
our chief executive officer or our board of directors. In
addition, our bylaws establish an advance notice procedure for
stockholder proposals to be brought before an annual meeting of
stockholders, including proposed nominations of candidates for
election to the board of directors. Stockholders at an annual
meeting may only consider proposals or nominations specified in
the notice of meeting or brought before the meeting by or at the
direction of the board of directors, or by a stockholder of
record on the record date for the meeting who is entitled to
vote at the meeting and who has delivered timely written notice
in proper form to our secretary of the stockholders
intention to bring such business before the meeting. These
provisions could have the effect of delaying until the next
stockholder meeting stockholder actions that are favored by the
holders of a majority of our outstanding voting securities.
Action by Written Consent. Our certificate of
incorporation and bylaws provide that action may be taken by
written consent of stockholders only for so long as William C.
Stone, investment funds affiliated with Carlyle, and certain
transferees of Carlyle collectively hold a majority of our
outstanding common stock. After such time, any action taken by
the stockholders must be effected at a duly called annual or
special meeting. These provisions make it more procedurally
difficult for a stockholder to place a proposal or nomination on
the meeting agenda or to take action without a meeting, and
therefore may reduce the likelihood that a stockholder will seek
to take independent action to replace directors or seek a
stockholder vote with respect to other matters that are not
supported by management.
Super-Majority Voting. The Delaware General
Corporation Law provides generally that the affirmative vote of
a majority of the shares entitled to vote on any matter is
required to amend a corporations certificate of
incorporation or bylaws, unless a corporations certificate
of incorporation or bylaws, as the case may be, requires a
greater percentage. Our bylaws may be amended or repealed by a
majority vote of our board of directors or the affirmative vote
of the holders of at least two-thirds of the votes that all our
stockholders would be entitled to cast in an annual election of
directors. In addition, the affirmative vote of the holders of
at least two-thirds of the votes which all our stockholders
would be entitled to cast in an election of directors is
required to amend or repeal or to adopt any provisions
inconsistent with any of the provisions of our certificate of
incorporation described in the prior two paragraphs.
Authorized But Unissued Shares. The authorized but
unissued shares of common stock and preferred stock are
available for future issuance without stockholder approval,
subject to any limitations imposed by the listing standards of
the NASDAQ Stock Market. These additional shares may be used for
a variety of corporate finance transactions, acquisitions and
employee benefit plans. The existence of authorized but unissued
and unreserved common stock and preferred stock could make more
difficult or discourage an attempt to obtain control of us by
means of a proxy contest, tender offer, merger or otherwise.
Delaware Takeover Statute. We have opted out of
Section 203 of the Delaware General Corporation Law, which
would have otherwise imposed additional requirements regarding
mergers and other business combinations.
149
Transfer agent
and registrar
The transfer agent and registrar for our common stock is
American Stock Transfer & Trust Company.
NASDAQ Global
Select Market listing
Our common stock is listed on the NASDAQ Global Select Market
under the trading symbol SSNC.
150
Shares eligible
for future sale
Future sales of substantial amounts of our common stock in the
public market, or the availability of such shares for sale,
could adversely affect the market price of our common stock. As
described below, only a limited number of shares will be
available for sale shortly after this offering due to
contractual and legal restrictions on resale. Nevertheless,
sales of our common stock after such restrictions lapse, or the
perception that those sales may occur, could adversely affect
the prevailing market price at such time and our ability to
raise equity capital in the future.
Based on 72,792,512 shares of common stock outstanding as
of December 31, 2010, upon completion of this offering
75,272,612 shares of common stock will be outstanding,
reflecting 2,000,000 shares sold by us in this offering and
assuming no exercise of options outstanding as of
December 31, 2010, other than those options exercised by
the selling stockholders for the purpose of selling shares in
this offering, and assuming no exercise by the underwriters of
their over-allotment option. The 12,333,750 shares sold in
our IPO, the 11,000,000 shares sold in this offering and
any shares sold pursuant to the underwriters
over-allotment exercise will generally be freely tradable
without restriction or further registration under the Securities
Act, except for any shares that may be acquired by any of our
affiliates as that term is defined in Rule 144
under the Securities Act, which will be subject to resale
limitations of Rule 144. The remaining
51,938,862 shares of our common stock outstanding will be
restricted securities as a result of securities laws or
lock-up
agreements as described below. Following the expiration of the
lock-up
period, all shares will be eligible for resale in compliance
with Rule 144 or Rule 701 under the Securities Act.
Lock-up
agreements
All of our directors and officers and certain other stockholders
and holders of options to purchase shares of our common stock,
who collectively owned 66,146,157 shares of our common
stock (including vested options and the shares of our common
stock to be sold by selling stockholders in this offering) as of
the date of this prospectus, have agreed that, without the prior
written consent of J.P. Morgan Securities LLC, they will not,
subject to limited exceptions, during the period ending
90 days after the date of this prospectus, subject to
extension in specified circumstances:
|
|
|
offer, pledge, sell, contract to sell, sell any option or
contract to purchase, purchase any option or contract to sell,
grant any option, right or warrant to purchase, lend or
otherwise transfer or dispose of, directly or indirectly, any
shares of our common stock or any securities convertible into or
exercisable or exchangeable for common stock; or
|
|
|
enter into any swap or other arrangement that transfers to
another, in whole or in part, any of the economic consequences
of ownership of our common stock,
|
whether any transaction described above is to be settled by
delivery of our common stock or such other securities, in cash
or otherwise.
These agreements are subject to certain exceptions, and also
subject to extensions for up to an additional 34 days, as
described in the section of this prospectus entitled
Underwriting.
Upon the expiration of the applicable
lock-up
periods, all of the shares subject to such
lock-up
restrictions will become eligible for sale, subject to the
limitations discussed above.
151
Rule 144
Affiliate
resales of restricted securities
In general, under Rule 144, a person who is an affiliate of
ours, or who was an affiliate at any time during the
90 days before a sale, who has beneficially owned shares of
our common stock for at least six months would be entitled to
sell in brokers transactions or certain
riskless principal transactions or to market makers,
a number of shares within any three-month period that does not
exceed the greater of:
|
|
|
1% of the number of shares of our common stock then outstanding,
which will equal approximately 752,726 shares immediately
after this offering; or
|
|
|
the average weekly trading volume in our common stock on the
NASDAQ Global Select Market during the four calendar weeks
preceding the filing of a notice on Form 144 with respect
to such sale.
|
Affiliate resales under Rule 144 are also subject to the
availability of current public information about us. In
addition, if the number of shares being sold under Rule 144
by an affiliate during any three-month period exceeds
5,000 shares or has an aggregate sale price in excess of
$50,000, the seller must file a notice on Form 144 with the
Securities and Exchange Commission and the NASDAQ concurrently
with either the placing of a sale order with the broker or the
execution directly with a market maker.
Non-affiliate
resales of restricted securities
In general, under Rule 144, a person who is not an
affiliate of ours at the time of sale, and has not been an
affiliate at any time during the three months preceding a sale,
and who has beneficially owned shares of our common stock for at
least six months but less than a year, is entitled to sell such
shares subject only to the availability of current public
information about us. If such person has held our shares for at
least one year, such person can resell under Rule 144(b)(1)
without regard to any Rule 144 restrictions, including the
90-day
public company requirement and the current public information
requirement.
Non-affiliate resales are not subject to the manner of sale,
volume limitation or notice filing provisions of Rule 144.
Rule 701
In general, under Rule 701, any of an issuers
employees, directors, officers, consultants or advisors who
purchases shares from the issuer in connection with a
compensatory stock or option plan or other written agreement
before the effective date of a registration statement under the
Securities Act is entitled to sell such shares 90 days
after such effective date in reliance on Rule 144. An
affiliate of the issuer can resell shares in reliance on
Rule 144 without having to comply with the holding period
requirement, and non-affiliates of the issuer can resell shares
in reliance on Rule 144 without having to comply with the
current public information and holding period requirements.
The Securities and Exchange Commission has indicated that
Rule 701 will apply to typical stock options granted by an
issuer before it becomes subject to the reporting requirements
of the Exchange Act, along with the shares acquired upon
exercise of such options, including exercises after an issuer
becomes subject to the reporting requirements of the Exchange
Act.
152
Stock
options
We have registered on registration statements on
Form S-8
under the Securities Act 17,034,258 shares of our common
stock issued or reserved for issuance under our equity incentive
plans plus shares issuable upon exercise of outstanding options.
As of the date of this prospectus, we have granted options to
purchase 12,879,739 shares of our common stock, of which
9,198,701 shares are vested and exercisable. Subject to the
expiration of any
lock-up
restrictions described above and following the completion of any
applicable vesting periods, shares of our common stock issuable
upon the exercise of options granted or to be granted under our
equity incentive plans will be freely tradable without
restriction under the Securities Act, unless such shares are
held by any of our affiliates.
Registration
rights
Upon the closing of this offering, the holders of
50,475,734 shares of common stock or their transferees will
be entitled to various rights with respect to the registration
of these shares under the Securities Act. Registration of these
shares under the Securities Act would result in these shares
becoming fully tradable without restriction under the Securities
Act immediately upon the effectiveness of the registration,
except for shares purchased by affiliates. See Description
of capital stockRegistration rights for additional
information. Shares covered by a registration statement will be
eligible for sale in the public market upon the expiration or
release from the terms of the
lock-up
agreement.
153
Certain material
U.S. federal tax considerations
The following is a general discussion of the material
U.S. federal income and estate tax considerations
applicable to U.S. and
non-U.S. holders
with respect to their ownership and disposition of shares of our
common stock. This discussion is for general information only
and is not tax advice. Accordingly, all prospective holders of
our common stock should consult their own tax advisors with
respect to the U.S. federal, state, local and
non-U.S. tax
consequences of the purchase, ownership and disposition of our
common stock. For purposes of this discussion, a
U.S. holder is a beneficial owner of our common
stock that is (i) an individual citizen or resident of the
United States; (ii) a corporation (or any other entity
treated as a corporation for U.S. federal income tax
purposes) created or organized in or under the laws of the
United States, any state thereof or the District of
Columbia; (iii) an estate the income of which is subject to
U.S. federal income taxation regardless of its source; or
(iv) a trust if it (A) is subject to the primary
supervision of a court within the United States and one or more
U.S. persons have the authority to control all substantial
decisions of the trust or (B) has a valid election in
effect under applicable U.S. Treasury Regulations to be
treated as a U.S. person.
For purposes of this discussion, a
non-U.S. holder
is a beneficial owner of our common stock (other than a
partnership or any other entity that is treated as a partnership
for U.S. federal income tax purposes) that is not a
U.S. holder.
This discussion is based on current provisions of the
U.S. Internal Revenue Code of 1986, which we refer to as
the Internal Revenue Code, existing and proposed
U.S. Treasury Regulations promulgated thereunder, current
administrative rulings and judicial decisions, in effect as of
the date of this prospectus, all of which are subject to change
or to differing interpretation, possibly with retroactive
effect. Any change could alter the tax consequences to holders
described in this prospectus. We assume in this discussion that
a holder holds shares of our common stock as a capital asset,
which is generally property held for investment.
This discussion does not address all aspects of
U.S. federal income and estate taxation that may be
relevant to a particular holder in light of that holders
individual circumstances nor does it address any aspects of
U.S. state, local or
non-U.S. taxes.
This discussion also does not consider any specific facts or
circumstances that may apply to a holder and does not address
the special tax rules applicable to particular holders, such as:
|
|
|
insurance companies;
|
|
|
tax-exempt organizations;
|
|
|
financial institutions;
|
|
|
brokers or dealers in securities;
|
|
|
regulated investment companies;
|
|
|
pension plans;
|
|
|
controlled foreign corporations;
|
|
|
passive foreign investment companies;
|
|
|
owners that hold our common stock as part of a straddle, hedge,
conversion transaction, synthetic security or other integrated
investment; and
|
|
|
certain U.S. expatriates.
|
154
In addition, this discussion does not address the tax treatment
of partnerships or persons who hold their common stock through
partnerships or other pass-through entities for
U.S. federal income tax purposes. If a partnership or other
pass-through entity holds common stock, the tax treatment of a
partner will generally depend on the status of the partner and
the activities of the partnership or other pass-through entity.
A partner in a partnership or other pass-through entity that
will hold our common stock should consult his, her or its own
tax advisor regarding the tax consequences of the acquisition,
holding and disposing of our common stock through a partnership
or other pass-through entity, as applicable.
There can be no assurance that the Internal Revenue Service,
which we refer to as the IRS, will not challenge one or more of
the tax consequences described herein, and we have not obtained,
nor do we intend to obtain, an opinion of counsel with respect
to the U.S. federal income or estate tax consequences to a
holder of the purchase, ownership or disposition of our common
stock.
U.S.
holders
Distributions
on our common stock
The following discussion is a summary of certain
U.S. federal income tax considerations relevant to a
U.S. holder of our common stock.
Distributions with respect to common stock, if any, will be
includible in the gross income of a U.S. holder as ordinary
dividend income to the extent paid out of current or accumulated
earnings and profits, as determined for U.S. federal income
tax purposes. Any portion of a distribution in excess of current
or accumulated earnings and profits would be treated as a return
of the holders tax basis in its common stock and then as
gain from the sale or exchange of the common stock. Under
current law, if certain requirements are met, a maximum 15%
U.S. federal income tax rate will apply to any dividends
that are paid prior to January 1, 2013 to a
U.S. holder of common stock who is an individual. Unless
the reduced rate provision is extended by subsequent
legislation, for tax years beginning on or after January 1,
2013, dividends will be taxed at regular ordinary income rates.
Dividend distributions to U.S. holders that are
corporations may qualify for the 70% dividends received
deduction, which we refer to as a DRD, which is generally
available to corporations that own less than 20% of the voting
power or value of the outstanding stock of the distributing
U.S. corporation. A U.S. holder that is a corporation
holding 20% or more of the distributing U.S. corporation
may be eligible for an 80% DRD. No assurance can be given that
we will have sufficient earnings and profits (as determined for
U.S. federal income tax purposes) to cause any
distributions to be eligible for a DRD. In addition, a DRD is
available only if certain holding period and other taxable
income requirements are satisfied.
Gain on sale,
exchange or other disposition of our common stock
A U.S. holder of common stock will generally recognize gain
or loss on the taxable sale, exchange or other disposition of
such shares in an amount equal to the difference between such
U.S. holders amount realized on the sale and its tax
basis in the common stock sold. A U.S. holders amount
realized generally is equal to the amount of cash and the fair
market value of any property received in consideration of its
common stock. The gain or loss generally is capital gain or loss
if the U.S. holder holds the common stock as a capital
asset, and long-term capital gain or loss if the common stock
was held for more than one year at the time of
155
disposition. Capital loss can generally only be used to offset
capital gain (individuals may also offset excess capital losses
against up to $3,000 of ordinary income per tax year). Under
current law, long-term capital gain recognized by an individual
U.S. holder prior to January 1, 2013 is subject to a
maximum 15% U.S. federal income tax rate.
Additional tax
on dividends and capital gains
For taxable years beginning after December 31, 2012,
certain U.S. holders that are individuals, estates or
trusts must pay up to an additional 3.8% tax on dividends and
capital gains.
Non-U.S.
holders
The following discussion is a summary of certain
U.S. federal income tax considerations relevant to a
non-U.S. holder
of our common stock.
Distributions
on our common stock
Distributions on our common stock generally will constitute
dividends for U.S. federal income tax purposes to the
extent paid from our current or accumulated earnings and
profits, as determined under U.S. federal income tax
principles. If a distribution exceeds our current and
accumulated earnings and profits, the excess will be treated as
a tax-free return of the
non-U.S. holders
investment, up to such holders tax basis in its common
stock. Any remaining excess will be treated as capital gain,
subject to the tax treatment described below in Gain on
sale, exchange or other disposition of our common stock.
Dividends paid to a
non-U.S. holder
generally will be subject to withholding of U.S. federal
income tax at a 30% rate or such lower rate as may be specified
by an applicable income tax treaty between the
United States and such holders country of residence.
If we determine, at a time reasonably close to the date of
payment of a distribution on our common stock, that the
distribution will not constitute a dividend because we do not
anticipate having current or accumulated earnings and profits,
we intend not to withhold any U.S. federal income tax on
the distribution as permitted by U.S. Treasury Regulations.
If we or another withholding agent withholds tax on such a
distribution, a
non-U.S. holder
may be entitled to a refund of the tax withheld, which the
non-U.S. holder
may claim by timely filing a U.S. tax return with the IRS.
Dividends that are treated as effectively connected with a trade
or business conducted by a
non-U.S. holder
within the United States and, if an applicable income tax treaty
so provides, that are attributable to a permanent establishment
or a fixed base maintained by the
non-U.S. holder
within the United States, are generally exempt from the 30%
withholding tax if the
non-U.S. holder
satisfies applicable certification and disclosure requirements.
However, such U.S. effectively connected income, net of
specified deductions and credits, is taxed at the same graduated
U.S. federal income tax rates applicable to
U.S. persons (as defined in the Internal Revenue Code). Any
U.S. effectively connected income received by a
non-U.S. holder
that is a corporation may also, under certain circumstances, be
subject to an additional branch profits tax at a 30%
rate or such lower rate as may be specified by an applicable
income tax treaty between the United States and such
holders country of residence.
A
non-U.S. holder
of our common stock who claims the benefit of an applicable
income tax treaty between the United States and such
holders country of residence generally will be required to
provide a properly executed IRS
Form W-8BEN
(or successor form) and satisfy
156
applicable certification and other requirements.
Non-U.S. holders
are urged to consult their tax advisors regarding their
entitlement to benefits under a relevant income tax treaty.
A
non-U.S. holder
that is eligible for a reduced rate of U.S. withholding tax
under an income tax treaty may obtain a refund or credit of any
excess amounts withheld by timely filing a U.S. tax return
with the IRS.
Gain on sale,
exchange or other disposition of our common stock
In general, a
non-U.S. holder
will not be subject to any U.S. federal income tax or
withholding tax on any gain realized upon such holders
sale, exchange or other disposition of shares of our common
stock unless:
|
|
|
the gain is effectively connected with a U.S. trade or
business and, if an applicable income tax treaty so provides, is
attributable to a permanent establishment or a fixed base
maintained by such
non-U.S. holder,
in which case the
non-U.S. holder
generally will be taxed at the graduated U.S. federal
income tax rates applicable to U.S. persons (as defined in
the Internal Revenue Code) and, if the
non-U.S. holder
is a foreign corporation, the branch profits tax described above
in Distributions on our common stock also may apply;
|
|
|
the
non-U.S. holder
is a nonresident alien individual who is present in the United
States for 183 days or more in the taxable year of the
disposition and certain other conditions are met, in which case
the
non-U.S. holder
will be subject to a 30% tax (or such lower rate as may be
specified by an applicable income tax treaty between the United
States and such holders country of residence) on the net
gain derived from the disposition, which may be offset by
U.S. source capital losses of the
non-U.S. holder,
if any; or
|
|
|
we are or have been, at any time during the five-year period
preceding such disposition (or the
non-U.S. holders
holding period, if shorter), a U.S. real property
holding corporation unless our common stock is regularly
traded on an established securities market and the
non-U.S. holder
holds no more than 5% of our outstanding common stock, directly
or indirectly, during the shorter of the
five-year
period ending on the date of the disposition or the period that
the
non-U.S. holder
held our common stock. If we are determined to be a
U.S. real property holding corporation and the foregoing
exception does not apply, then a purchaser will generally
withhold 10% of the proceeds payable to a
non-U.S. holder
from a sale of our common stock and the
non-U.S. holder
generally will be taxed on its net gain derived from the
disposition at the graduated U.S. federal income tax rates
applicable to U.S. persons (as defined in the Internal
Revenue Code). Generally, a corporation is a U.S. real
property holding corporation only if the fair market value of
its U.S. real property interests equals or exceeds 50% of
the sum of the fair market value of its worldwide real property
interests plus its other assets used or held for use in a trade
or business. Although there can be no assurance, we do not
believe that we are, or have been, a U.S. real property
holding corporation, or that we are likely to become one in the
future. No assurance can be provided that our common stock will
be regularly traded on an established securities market for
purposes of the rules described above.
|
U.S. federal
estate tax
Shares of our common stock that are owned or treated as owned at
the time of death by an individual who is a citizen or resident
of the United States, as specifically defined for
157
U.S. federal estate tax purposes, will be included in the
individuals gross estate for U.S. federal estate tax
purposes.
Shares of our common stock that are owned or treated as owned at
the time of death by an individual who is not a citizen or
resident of the United States, as specifically defined for
U.S. federal estate tax purposes, are considered
U.S. situs assets and will be included in the
individuals gross estate for U.S. federal estate tax
purposes. Such shares, therefore, may be subject to
U.S. federal estate tax, unless an applicable estate tax or
other treaty provides otherwise.
Backup
withholding and information reporting
We will report to holders of our common stock and the IRS the
amount of dividends paid during each calendar year, if any, and
the amount of any tax withheld. All distributions to holders of
our common stock are subject to any applicable withholding.
Under U.S. federal income tax law, interest, dividends and other
reportable payments may, under certain circumstances, be subject
to backup withholding at the applicable rate
(currently 28%). Backup withholding generally applies to a U.S.
holder if the holder (i) fails to furnish its social security
number or other taxpayer identification number
(TIN), (ii) furnishes an incorrect TIN,
(iii) fails to properly report interest or dividends, or
(iv) under certain circumstances, fails to provide a
certified statement, signed under penalty of perjury, that the
TIN provided is its correct number and that it is a U.S. person
that is not subject to backup withholding. Backup withholding is
not an additional tax but merely an advance payment, which may
be refunded to the extent it results in an overpayment of tax
and the appropriate information is timely supplied to the IRS.
Certain persons are exempt from backup withholding, including,
in certain circumstances, corporations, financial institutions
and non-U.S. holders (provided such non-U.S. holders comply with
applicable certification procedures).
Information reporting and backup withholding also will generally
apply to the proceeds of a disposition of our common stock by a
U.S. holder or by a
non-U.S. holder
effected by or through the U.S. office of any broker,
U.S. or foreign, unless the holder certifies its status and
satisfies certain other requirements, or otherwise establishes
an exemption. Generally, information reporting and backup
withholding will not apply to a payment of disposition proceeds
to a
non-U.S. holder
where the transaction is effected outside the United States
through a
non-U.S. office
of a broker. However, for information reporting purposes,
dispositions effected through a
non-U.S. office
of a broker with substantial U.S. ownership or operations
generally will be treated in a manner similar to dispositions
effected through a U.S. office of a broker.
Non-U.S. holders
should consult their own tax advisors regarding the application
of the information reporting and backup withholding rules to
them.
Copies of information returns may be made available to the tax
authorities of the country in which the
non-U.S. holder
resides or is incorporated under the provisions of a specific
treaty or agreement.
158
Underwriting
We and the selling stockholders are offering the shares of
common stock described in this prospectus through a number of
underwriters. J.P. Morgan Securities LLC, Morgan
Stanley & Co. Incorporated, Deutsche Bank Securities
Inc., Needham & Company, LLC, Raymond
James & Associates, Inc., Wells Fargo Securities, LLC
and William Blair & Company, L.L.C. are the principal
underwriters managing our offering. We and the selling
stockholders have entered into an underwriting agreement with
the underwriters. Subject to the terms and conditions of the
underwriting agreement, we and the selling stockholders have
agreed to sell to the underwriters, and each underwriter has
severally agreed to purchase, at the public offering price less
the underwriting discounts and commissions set forth on the
cover page of this prospectus, the number of shares of common
stock listed next to its name in the following table:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
Name
|
|
shares
|
|
|
|
|
J.P. Morgan Securities LLC
|
|
|
3,960,000
|
|
Morgan Stanley & Co. Incorporated
|
|
|
2,420,000
|
|
Deutsche Bank Securities Inc.
|
|
|
2,420,000
|
|
Needham & Company, LLC
|
|
|
550,000
|
|
Raymond James & Associates, Inc.
|
|
|
550,000
|
|
Wells Fargo Securities, LLC
|
|
|
550,000
|
|
William Blair & Company, L.L.C.
|
|
|
550,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
11,000,000
|
|
|
|
The underwriters are committed to purchase all the common shares
offered by us and the selling stockholders if they purchase any
shares. The underwriting agreement also provides that if an
underwriter defaults, the purchase commitments of non-defaulting
underwriters may also be increased or the offering may be
terminated.
The underwriters propose to offer the common shares directly to
the public at the public offering price set forth on the cover
page of this prospectus and to certain dealers at that price
less a concession not in excess of $0.4224 per share. After the
public offering of the shares, the offering price and other
selling terms may be changed by the underwriters. Sales of
shares made outside of the United States may be made by
affiliates of the underwriters. The representatives have advised
us that the underwriters do not intend to confirm discretionary
sales in excess of 5% of the common shares offered in this
offering.
The underwriters have an option to buy up to 1,100,000
additional shares of common stock from us to cover sales of
shares by the underwriters which exceed the number of shares
specified in the table above. The underwriters have 30 days
from the date of this prospectus to exercise this over-allotment
option. If any shares are purchased with this over-allotment
option, the underwriters will purchase shares in approximately
the same proportion as shown in the table above. If any
additional shares of common stock are purchased, the
underwriters will offer the additional shares on the same terms
as those on which the shares are being offered.
159
The underwriting fee is equal to the public offering price per
share of common stock less the amount paid by the underwriters
to us and the selling stockholders per share of common stock.
The underwriting fee is $0.704 per share.
The following table shows the per share and total public
offering price, underwriting discounts and commissions, and
proceeds before expenses to us and the selling stockholders.
These amounts are shown assuming both no exercise and full
exercise of the underwriters option to purchase up to an
additional shares of common stock.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
Per share
|
|
|
No exercise
|
|
|
Full exercise
|
|
|
|
|
Public offering price
|
|
$
|
17.60
|
|
|
$
|
193,600,000
|
|
|
$
|
212,960,000
|
|
Underwriting discounts and commissions to be paid by:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Us
|
|
$
|
0.704
|
|
|
$
|
1,408,000
|
|
|
$
|
2,182,400
|
|
The selling stockholders
|
|
$
|
0.704
|
|
|
$
|
6,336,000
|
|
|
$
|
6,336,000
|
|
Proceeds, before expenses, to us
|
|
$
|
16.896
|
|
|
$
|
33,792,000
|
|
|
$
|
52,377,600
|
|
Proceeds, before expenses, to selling stockholders
|
|
$
|
16.896
|
|
|
$
|
152,064,000
|
|
|
$
|
152,064,000
|
|
|
|
We estimate that the total expenses of this offering, including
registration, filing and listing fees, printing fees and legal
and accounting expenses, but excluding the underwriting
discounts and commissions, will be approximately
$0.8 million. The underwriters have agreed to reimburse
SS&C Holdings for $484,000 (or $532,400 if the underwriters
exercise their option to purchase additional shares in full) of
such offering expenses.
A prospectus in electronic format may be made available on the
web sites maintained by one or more underwriters, or selling
group members, if any, participating in the offering. The
underwriters may agree to allocate a number of shares to
underwriters and selling group members for sale to their online
brokerage account holders. Internet distributions will be
allocated by the representatives to underwriters and selling
group members that may make Internet distributions on the same
basis as other allocations.
We and all of our directors and officers and certain other
stockholders and holders of options to purchase shares of our
common stock, who collectively owned 66,146,157 shares of
our common stock (including vested options and the shares of our
common stock to be sold by selling stockholders in this
offering) as of the date of this prospectus, have agreed that,
without the prior written consent of the representatives of the
underwriters, we and they will not, during the period ending
90 days after the date of this prospectus:
|
|
|
offer, pledge, sell, contract to sell, sell any option or
contract to purchase, purchase any option or contract to sell,
grant any option, right or warrant to purchase, lend or
otherwise transfer or dispose of, directly or indirectly, any
shares of our common stock or any securities convertible into or
exercisable or exchangeable for common stock; or
|
|
|
enter into any swap or other arrangement that transfers to
another, in whole or in part, any of the economic consequences
of ownership of our common stock,
|
whether any transaction described above is to be settled by
delivery of our common stock or such other securities, in cash
or otherwise. In addition, we and each such person agrees that,
without the prior written consent of the representatives of the
underwriters, it will not, during
160
the period ending 90 days after the date of this
prospectus, make any demand for, or exercise any right with
respect to, the registration of any shares of common stock or
any security convertible into or exercisable or exchangeable for
common stock, other than with respect to this offering.
The restrictions described in the immediately preceding
paragraph do not apply to:
|
|
|
the sale of shares to the underwriters;
|
|
|
transactions by any person other than us relating to shares of
common stock or other securities acquired in open market
transactions after the completion of the offering of the shares;
|
|
|
transfers of shares of common stock or any security convertible
into our common stock as a bona fide gift;
|
|
|
transfers to family members or to trusts for the benefit of the
stockholder or family members of the stockholder, in each case,
for estate planning purposes;
|
|
|
distributions of shares of common stock or any security
convertible into or exercisable for common stock to partners,
members or equityholders of the stockholder;
|
|
|
a stockholders entry into, or amendment of, a written
trading plan designed to comply with Rule 10b5-1 under the
Exchange Act, provided that no sales are made pursuant to such
trading plan during the restricted period and that the
establishment of such plan will not result in any public filing
or other public announcement of such plan by the locked-up party
or us during the restricted period; or
|
|
|
the exercise of an option to purchase shares of common stock
granted under a stock incentive plan or stock purchase plan
described in this prospectus or the acceptance of restricted
stock awards from us and the disposition of shares of restricted
stock to us pursuant to the terms of such plan.
|
The 90-day
restricted period described in the preceding paragraph will be
extended if:
|
|
|
during the last 17 days of the
90-day
restricted period we issue an earnings release or a material
news event relating to us occurs; or
|
|
|
prior to the expiration of the
90-day
restricted period, we announce that we will release earnings
results during the
16-day
period beginning on the last day of the
90-day
restricted period,
|
in which case the restrictions described in the preceding
paragraph will continue to apply until the expiration of the
18-day
period beginning on the issuance of the earnings release or the
occurrence of the material news or material event.
In connection with this offering, the underwriters may engage in
stabilizing transactions, which involves making bids for,
purchasing and selling shares of common stock in the open market
for the purpose of preventing or retarding a decline in the
market price of the common stock while this offering is in
progress. These stabilizing transactions may include making
short sales of the common stock, which involves the sale by the
underwriters of a greater number of shares of common stock than
they are required to purchase in this offering, and purchasing
shares of common stock on the open market to cover positions
created by short sales. Short sales may be covered
shorts, which are short positions in an amount not greater than
the underwriters
161
over-allotment option referred to above, or may be
naked shorts, which are short positions in excess of
that amount. The underwriters may close out any covered short
position either by exercising their over-allotment option, in
whole or in part, or by purchasing shares in the open market. In
making this determination, the underwriters will consider, among
other things, the price of shares available for purchase in the
open market compared to the price at which the underwriters may
purchase shares through the over-allotment option. A naked short
position is more likely to be created if the underwriters are
concerned that there may be downward pressure on the price of
the common stock in the open market that could adversely affect
investors who purchase in this offering. To the extent that the
underwriters create a naked short position, they will purchase
shares in the open market to cover the position.
The underwriters have advised us that, pursuant to
Regulation M of the Securities Act of 1933, they may also
engage in other activities that stabilize, maintain or otherwise
affect the price of the common stock, including the imposition
of penalty bids. This means that if the representatives of the
underwriters purchase common stock in the open market in
stabilizing transactions or to cover short sales, the
representatives can require the underwriters that sold those
shares as part of this offering to repay the underwriting
discount received by them.
These activities may have the effect of raising or maintaining
the market price of the common stock or preventing or retarding
a decline in the market price of the common stock, and, as a
result, the price of the common stock may be higher than the
price that otherwise might exist in the open market. If the
underwriters commence these activities, they may discontinue
them at any time. The underwriters may carry out these
transactions on The NASDAQ Global Select Market, in the
over-the-counter market or otherwise.
Prior to purchasing the shares of common stock to be sold in the
offering, on February 3, 2011, one of the underwriters
purchased, on behalf of itself and the other underwriters,
10,578 shares of our common stock at an average price of
$17.497 per share in stabilizing transactions.
Other than in the United States, no action has been taken by us
or the underwriters that would permit a public offering of the
securities offered by this prospectus in any jurisdiction where
action for that purpose is required. The securities offered by
this prospectus may not be offered or sold, directly or
indirectly, nor may this prospectus or any other offering
material or advertisements in connection with the offer and sale
of any such securities be distributed or published in any
jurisdiction, except under circumstances that will result in
compliance with the applicable rules and regulations of that
jurisdiction. Persons into whose possession this prospectus
comes are advised to inform themselves about and to observe any
restrictions relating to the offering and the distribution of
this prospectus. This prospectus does not constitute an offer to
sell or a solicitation of an offer to buy any securities offered
by this prospectus in any jurisdiction in which such an offer or
a solicitation is unlawful.
We, the selling stockholders and the underwriters have agreed to
indemnify each other against certain liabilities, including
liabilities under the Securities Act.
Certain of the underwriters and their respective affiliates
have, from time to time, performed, and may in the future
perform, various financial advisory and investment banking
services for us and our subsidiaries, for which they received or
will receive customary fees and expenses. In addition, from time
to time, certain of the underwriters and their affiliates may
effect transactions for their own account or the account of
customers, and hold on behalf of themselves or their customers,
long or short positions in our debt or equity securities or
loans, and may do so in the future. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.,
an affiliate of J.P. Morgan Securities
162
LLC, is a lender and the administrative agent under our senior
credit facilities, and Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., an affiliate of
Wells Fargo Securities, LLC, is a lender and syndication agent
under such credit facilities. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. and
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. received customary compensation for its
services in connection with the senior credit facilities.
In relation to each Member State of the European Economic Area
which has implemented the Prospectus Directive (each, a
Relevant Member State), from and including the date
on which the European Union Prospectus Directive (the EU
Prospectus Directive) is implemented in that Relevant
Member State (the Relevant Implementation Date) an
offer of securities described in this prospectus may not be made
to the public in that Relevant Member State prior to the
publication of a prospectus in relation to the shares which has
been approved by the competent authority in that Relevant Member
State or, where appropriate, approved in another Relevant Member
State and notified to the competent authority in that Relevant
Member State, all in accordance with the EU Prospectus
Directive, except that it may, with effect from and including
the Relevant Implementation Date, make an offer of shares to the
public in that Relevant Member State at any time:
|
|
|
to legal entities which are authorized or regulated to operate
in the financial markets or, if not so authorized or regulated,
whose corporate purpose is solely to invest in securities;
|
|
|
to any legal entity which has two or more of (1) an average
of at least 250 employees during the last financial year;
(2) a total balance sheet of more than 43,000,000 and
(3) an annual net turnover of more than 50,000,000,
as shown in its last annual or consolidated accounts;
|
|
|
to fewer than 100 natural or legal persons (other than qualified
investors as defined in the EU Prospectus Directive) subject to
obtaining the prior consent of the book-running
manager(s)
for any such offer; or
|
|
|
in any other circumstances which do not require the publication
by the Issuer of a prospectus pursuant to Article 3 of the
Prospectus Directive.
|
For the purposes of this provision, the expression an
offer of securities to the public in relation to any
securities in any Relevant Member State means the communication
in any form and by any means of sufficient information on the
terms of the offer and the securities to be offered so as to
enable an investor to decide to purchase or subscribe for the
securities, as the same may be varied in that Member State by
any measure implementing the EU Prospectus Directive in that
Member State and the expression EU Prospectus Directive means
Directive 2003/71/EC and includes any relevant implementing
measure in each Relevant Member State.
This document is only being distributed to and is only directed
at (i) persons who are outside the United Kingdom or
(ii) to investment professionals falling within
Article 19(5) of the Financial Services and Markets Act
2000 (Financial Promotion) Order 2005 (the Order) or
(iii) high net worth entities, and other persons to whom it
may lawfully be communicated, falling with Article 49(2)(a)
to (d) of the Order (all such persons together being
referred to as relevant persons). The securities are
only available to, and any invitation, offer or agreement to
subscribe, purchase or otherwise acquire such securities will be
engaged in only with, relevant persons. Any person who is not a
relevant person should not act or rely on this document or any
of its contents.
163
Industry and
market data
We obtained the industry, market and competitive position data
in this prospectus from our own internal estimates and research
as well as from industry and general publications and research,
surveys and studies conducted by third parties. Industry
publications, studies and surveys generally state that they have
been obtained from sources believed to be reliable, although
they do not guarantee the accuracy or completeness of such
information. While we believe that each of these studies and
publications is reliable, we have not independently verified
market and industry data from third-party sources. While we
believe our internal company research is reliable and the market
definitions are appropriate, neither such research nor these
definitions have been verified by any independent source.
Legal
matters
Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr LLP, Boston,
Massachusetts, has passed upon the validity of the shares of
common stock offered hereby. Goodwin Procter LLP, Boston,
Massachusetts, has acted as counsel for the underwriters in
connection with certain legal matters related to this offering.
Experts
The financial statements as of December 31, 2008 and 2009
and for each of the three years in the period ended
December 31, 2009 included in this prospectus have been so
included in reliance on the report of PricewaterhouseCoopers
LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, given on
the authority of said firm as experts in auditing and accounting.
164
Where you can
find additional information
We have filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission a
registration statement on
Form S-1
(File No. 333-171673) under the Securities Act with
respect to the shares of common stock offered hereby. This
prospectus, which constitutes a part of the registration
statement, does not contain all of the information set forth in
the registration statement or the exhibits and schedules filed
therewith. For further information about us and the common stock
offered hereby, we refer you to the registration statement and
the exhibits and schedules filed thereto. Statements contained
in this prospectus regarding the contents of any contract or any
other document that is filed as an exhibit to the registration
statement are not necessarily complete, and each such statement
is qualified in all respects by reference to the full text of
such contract or other document filed as an exhibit to the
registration statement. We file periodic reports, proxy
statements and other information with the Securities and
Exchange Commission pursuant to the Exchange Act. You may read
and copy these periodic reports, proxy statements and other
information at the Public Reference Room of the Securities and
Exchange Commission, 100 F Street, N.E.,
Room 1580, Washington, D.C. 20549. You may obtain
information on the operation of the public reference rooms by
calling the Securities and Exchange Commission at
1-800-SEC-0330.
The Securities and Exchange Commission also maintains an
Internet website that contains reports, proxy statements and
other information about issuers, like us, that file
electronically with the Securities and Exchange Commission. The
address of that site is www.sec.gov.
165
SS&C
Technologies Holdings, Inc.
|
|
|
|
|
Condensed consolidated financial statements of SS&C
Technologies Holdings, Inc.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-2
|
|
|
|
|
F-3
|
|
|
|
|
F-4
|
|
|
|
|
F-5
|
|
Consolidated financial statements of SS&C Technologies
Holdings, Inc.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-15
|
|
|
|
|
F-16
|
|
|
|
|
F-17
|
|
|
|
|
F-18
|
|
|
|
|
F-19
|
|
|
|
|
F-20
|
|
|
|
|
F-54
|
|
F-1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
(in thousands, except per share data)
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
|
ASSETS
|
Current assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
86,975
|
|
|
$
|
19,055
|
|
Accounts receivable, net of allowance for doubtful accounts of
$1,981 and $1,425, respectively
|
|
|
44,834
|
|
|
|
41,600
|
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets
|
|
|
5,950
|
|
|
|
6,164
|
|
Prepaid income taxes
|
|
|
6,282
|
|
|
|
669
|
|
Deferred income taxes
|
|
|
1,467
|
|
|
|
1,780
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets
|
|
|
145,508
|
|
|
|
69,268
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property and equipment:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Leasehold improvements
|
|
|
5,363
|
|
|
|
5,358
|
|
Equipment, furniture, and fixtures
|
|
|
28,754
|
|
|
|
25,915
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
34,117
|
|
|
|
31,273
|
|
Less accumulated depreciation
|
|
|
(20,953
|
)
|
|
|
(17,237
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net property and equipment
|
|
|
13,164
|
|
|
|
14,036
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred income taxes
|
|
|
649
|
|
|
|
499
|
|
Goodwill (Note 10)
|
|
|
895,182
|
|
|
|
885,517
|
|
Intangible and other assets, net of accumulated amortization of
$143,291 and $116,670, respectively
|
|
|
191,136
|
|
|
|
216,321
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
1,245,639
|
|
|
$
|
1,185,641
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY
|
Current liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current portion of long-term debt (Note 6)
|
|
$
|
1,719
|
|
|
$
|
4,270
|
|
Accounts payable
|
|
|
2,666
|
|
|
|
4,804
|
|
Income taxes payable
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
703
|
|
Accrued employee compensation and benefits
|
|
|
12,654
|
|
|
|
14,693
|
|
Other accrued expenses
|
|
|
10,530
|
|
|
|
16,938
|
|
Interest payable
|
|
|
5,219
|
|
|
|
2,070
|
|
Deferred maintenance and other revenue
|
|
|
41,656
|
|
|
|
40,400
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities
|
|
|
74,444
|
|
|
|
83,878
|
|
Long-term debt, net of current portion (Note 6)
|
|
|
288,685
|
|
|
|
392,989
|
|
Other long-term liabilities
|
|
|
13,570
|
|
|
|
12,779
|
|
Deferred income taxes
|
|
|
40,451
|
|
|
|
50,008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
417,150
|
|
|
|
539,654
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments and contingencies (Note 8)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders equity (Notes 3 and 4):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Class A non-voting common stock, $0.01 par value,
5,000 shares authorized; 791 shares issued and
outstanding, of which 154 are unvested
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, $0.01 par value, 100,000 shares
authorized; 71,773 shares and 60,807 shares issued,
respectively, and 71,285 shares and 60,400 shares
outstanding, respectively
|
|
|
718
|
|
|
|
608
|
|
Additional paid-in capital
|
|
|
740,302
|
|
|
|
587,293
|
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income
|
|
|
23,743
|
|
|
|
16,436
|
|
Retained earnings
|
|
|
69,537
|
|
|
|
46,300
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
834,308
|
|
|
|
650,637
|
|
Less: cost of common stock in treasury, 488 shares and
407 shares, respectively
|
|
|
(5,819
|
)
|
|
|
(4,650
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity
|
|
|
828,489
|
|
|
|
645,987
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders equity
|
|
$
|
1,245,639
|
|
|
$
|
1,185,641
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to
condensed consolidated financial statements.
F-2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine months ended
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
(in thousands, except per share data)
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Software licenses
|
|
$
|
17,629
|
|
|
$
|
15,632
|
|
Maintenance
|
|
|
54,130
|
|
|
|
48,565
|
|
Professional services
|
|
|
15,384
|
|
|
|
14,872
|
|
Software-enabled services
|
|
|
155,652
|
|
|
|
120,801
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues
|
|
|
242,795
|
|
|
|
199,870
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of revenues:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Software licenses
|
|
|
5,754
|
|
|
|
6,304
|
|
Maintenance
|
|
|
24,305
|
|
|
|
20,352
|
|
Professional services
|
|
|
10,243
|
|
|
|
10,659
|
|
Software-enabled services
|
|
|
82,137
|
|
|
|
65,079
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total cost of revenues
|
|
|
122,439
|
|
|
|
102,394
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
120,356
|
|
|
|
97,476
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling and marketing
|
|
|
18,910
|
|
|
|
15,229
|
|
Research and development
|
|
|
23,486
|
|
|
|
19,593
|
|
General and administrative
|
|
|
19,165
|
|
|
|
14,683
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses
|
|
|
61,561
|
|
|
|
49,505
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income
|
|
|
58,795
|
|
|
|
47,971
|
|
Interest expense, net
|
|
|
(23,818
|
)
|
|
|
(27,791
|
)
|
Other income (expense), net
|
|
|
653
|
|
|
|
(1,256
|
)
|
Loss on extinguishment of debt
|
|
|
(5,480
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes
|
|
|
30,150
|
|
|
|
18,924
|
|
Provision for income taxes
|
|
|
6,913
|
|
|
|
5,928
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
23,237
|
|
|
$
|
12,996
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic earnings per share
|
|
$
|
0.34
|
|
|
$
|
0.22
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic weighted average number of common shares outstanding
|
|
|
67,919
|
|
|
|
60,378
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted earnings per share
|
|
$
|
0.32
|
|
|
$
|
0.21
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted weighted average number of common and common equivalent
shares outstanding
|
|
|
71,499
|
|
|
|
63,132
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to
condensed consolidated financial statements.
F-3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine months ended September 30,
|
|
(in thousands)
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flow from operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
23,237
|
|
|
$
|
12,996
|
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by
operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
30,356
|
|
|
|
26,707
|
|
Amortization of loan origination costs
|
|
|
2,896
|
|
|
|
1,724
|
|
(Gain) loss on sale or disposition of property and equipment
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
13
|
|
Deferred income taxes
|
|
|
(12,467
|
)
|
|
|
(8,727
|
)
|
Stock-based compensation expense
|
|
|
9,181
|
|
|
|
4,363
|
|
Provision for doubtful accounts
|
|
|
580
|
|
|
|
300
|
|
Changes in operating assets and liabilities, excluding effects
from acquisitions:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable
|
|
|
(2,009
|
)
|
|
|
2,594
|
|
Prepaid expenses and other assets
|
|
|
80
|
|
|
|
132
|
|
Accounts payable
|
|
|
(2,151
|
)
|
|
|
(184
|
)
|
Accrued expenses and other liabilities
|
|
|
90
|
|
|
|
3,491
|
|
Income taxes prepaid and payable
|
|
|
(2,392
|
)
|
|
|
(2,224
|
)
|
Deferred maintenance and other revenues
|
|
|
229
|
|
|
|
3,815
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities
|
|
|
47,629
|
|
|
|
45,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flow from investing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additions to property and equipment
|
|
|
(3,265
|
)
|
|
|
(1,192
|
)
|
Proceeds from sale of property and equipment
|
|
|
51
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
Cash paid for business acquisitions, net of cash acquired
|
|
|
(11,372
|
)
|
|
|
(10,327
|
)
|
Additions to capitalized software and other intangibles
|
|
|
(171
|
)
|
|
|
(46
|
)
|
Net cash used in investing activities
|
|
|
(14,757
|
)
|
|
|
(11,562
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flow from financing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Repayment of debt
|
|
|
(107,670
|
)
|
|
|
(11,735
|
)
|
Proceeds from common stock issuance, net of issuance costs
|
|
|
134,613
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from the exercise of stock options
|
|
|
5,880
|
|
|
|
1,991
|
|
Purchase of common stock for treasury
|
|
|
(1,169
|
)
|
|
|
(2,216
|
)
|
Income tax benefit related to exercise of stock options
|
|
|
3,453
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities
|
|
|
35,107
|
|
|
|
(11,960
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
(59
|
)
|
|
|
1,684
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
67,920
|
|
|
|
23,162
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period
|
|
|
19,055
|
|
|
|
29,299
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period
|
|
$
|
86,975
|
|
|
$
|
52,461
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental disclosure of cash paid for:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest
|
|
$
|
19,187
|
|
|
$
|
19,861
|
|
Income taxes, net
|
|
$
|
15,679
|
|
|
$
|
16,689
|
|
Supplemental disclosure of non-cash investing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See Note 9 for a discussion of acquisitions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to
condensed consolidated financial statements.
F-4
SS&C Technologies Holdings, Inc. is our top-level
holding company. SS&C Technologies, Inc., or
SS&C, is our primary operating company and a
wholly-owned subsidiary of SS&C Technologies Holdings, Inc.
We, us, our and the
Company mean SS&C Technologies Holdings, Inc.
and its consolidated subsidiaries, including SS&C.
The accompanying financial statements have been prepared in
accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the
United States of America (GAAP). These accounting
principles were applied on a basis consistent with those of the
audited consolidated financial statements contained in SS&C
Technologies Holdings, Inc.s prospectus dated
March 30, 2010 (Prospectus) and filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission (the SEC) on
March 31, 2010 pursuant to Rule 424(b) of the
Securities Act of 1933, as amended, among others. In the opinion
of the Company, the accompanying unaudited condensed
consolidated financial statements contain all adjustments
(consisting of only normal recurring adjustments, except as
noted elsewhere in the notes to the condensed consolidated
financial statements) necessary for a fair statement of its
financial position as of September 30, 2010, the results of
its operations for the nine months ended September 30, 2010
and 2009 and its cash flows for the nine months ended
September 30, 2010 and 2009. These statements do not
include all of the information and footnotes required by GAAP
for annual financial statements. The financial statements
contained herein should be read in conjunction with the audited
consolidated financial statements and footnotes as of and for
the year ended December 31, 2009, which were included in
the Prospectus. The December 31, 2009 consolidated balance
sheet data were derived from audited financial statements but do
not include all disclosures required by GAAP for annual
financial statements. The results of operations for the nine
months ended September 30, 2010 are not necessarily
indicative of the expected results for the full year. The
results of operations for the nine months ended
September 30, 2010 include an adjustment of
$0.3 million to reduce income tax expense related to tax
attributes of prior periods.
Reclassifications
Certain amounts in the prior year consolidated financial
statements have been reclassified to be comparable with the
current year presentation. These reclassifications have had no
effect on net income, working capital or net equity.
The Company acquired SS&C on November 23, 2005 through
the merger of Sunshine Merger Corporation, a wholly owned
subsidiary of the Company, into SS&C, with SS&C
surviving the merger as a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company
(the Transaction).
|
|
3.
|
Equity and
stock-based compensation
|
In April 2010, the Company authorized 5,000,000 shares of
preferred stock with a $0.01 par value per share.
F-5
SS&C
Technologies Holdings, Inc. and subsidiaries
Notes to condensed consolidated financial statements
(unaudited)(continued)
In April 2010, the Company completed the initial public offering
(IPO) of its common stock at an offering price of
$15.00 per share. The IPO included 8,225,000 newly issued shares
of common stock and 2,500,000 existing shares of the
Companys common stock sold by selling stockholders. On
April 13, 2010, the underwriters of the IPO purchased an
additional 1,608,750 shares of the Companys common
stock to cover over-allotments. The Company received total net
proceeds from the offering, including the sale of shares to
cover over-allotments, of approximately $134.6 million,
none of which relates to proceeds from the sale of shares by the
selling stockholders or the aggregate exercise price of stock
options exercised by selling stockholders.
In March 2010, the Companys Board of Directors approved an
8.5-for-1 stock split of the Companys common stock to be
effected in the form of a stock dividend, effective as of
March 10, 2010, and an increase in authorized shares to
100,000,000 shares of the Companys common stock and
5,000,000 shares of the Companys Class A
non-voting common stock. All share data as it relates to this
Form 10-Q
for prior periods has been retroactively revised to reflect the
stock split and increase in authorized shares.
In February 2010, the Companys Board of Directors amended
the 2006 equity incentive plan to provide for the conversion of
the outstanding superior options granted under the plan into
performance-based options that vest based on EBITDA performance
in 2010 and 2011. For purposes of Note 3, references to
EBITDA mean the Companys Consolidated EBITDA, as further
adjusted to exclude acquired EBITDA and cost savings. This
amendment affected 1,680,868 outstanding options.
In February 2010, the Companys Board of Directors
established SS&Cs annual EBITDA target range for
2010. As of that date, the Company estimated the
weighted-average fair value of the performance-based options
that vest upon the attainment of the 2010 EBITDA target range to
be $6.90 per share. In estimating the common stock value, the
Company valued the Company using the income approach and the
guideline company method. The Company used the following
weighted-average assumptions to estimate the option value:
expected term to exercise of 2.5 years; expected volatility
of 43.0%; risk-free interest rate of 1.2%; and no dividend
yield. Expected volatility is based on the historical volatility
of selected companies from the Companys peer group.
Expected term to exercise is based on the Companys
historical stock option exercise experience, adjusted for the
Transaction.
During the nine months ended September 30, 2010, the
Company recorded total stock-based compensation expense of
$9.2 million, of which $7.2 million related to the
performance-based options based upon managements
assessment of the probability that the Companys EBITDA for
2010 will meet or exceed the high end of the targeted range. The
annual EBITDA target for 2011 will be determined by the
Companys Board of Directors at the beginning of 2011.
Time-based options represented the remaining $2.0 million
of compensation expense recorded during the nine months ended
September 30, 2010.
During the nine months ended September 30, 2009, the
Company recorded total stock-based compensation expense of
$4.4 million, of which $1.7 million related to the
performance-based options based upon managements
assessment of the probability that the Companys EBITDA for
F-6
SS&C
Technologies Holdings, Inc. and subsidiaries
Notes to condensed consolidated financial statements
(unaudited)(continued)
2009 would fall within the targeted range and $0.1 million
related to the performance-based options that were immediately
vested by the Companys Board of Directors in February.
Time-based options represented the remaining 2.6 million of
compensation expense recorded during the nine months ended
September 30, 2009.
The amount of stock-based compensation expense recognized in the
Companys condensed consolidated statements of operations
for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009 was
as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine months ended September 30,
|
|
Statements of operations classification
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of maintenance
|
|
$
|
231
|
|
|
$
|
89
|
|
Cost of professional services
|
|
|
332
|
|
|
|
163
|
|
Cost of software-enabled services
|
|
|
1,924
|
|
|
|
875
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total cost of revenues
|
|
|
2,487
|
|
|
|
1,127
|
|
Selling and marketing
|
|
|
1,359
|
|
|
|
754
|
|
Research and development
|
|
|
924
|
|
|
|
467
|
|
General and administrative
|
|
|
4,411
|
|
|
|
2,015
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses
|
|
|
6,694
|
|
|
|
3,236
|
|
Total stock-based compensation expense
|
|
$
|
9,181
|
|
|
$
|
4,363
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A summary of stock option activity for the nine months ended
September 30, 2010 is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares of
|
|
|
|
underlying options
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at January 1, 2010
|
|
|
12,737,559
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
2,154,135
|
|
Cancelled/forfeited
|
|
|
(182,330
|
)
|
Exercised
|
|
|
(1,770,035
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at September 30, 2010
|
|
|
12,939,329
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Items defined as comprehensive income, such as foreign currency
translation adjustments and unrealized gains on interest rate
swaps qualifying as hedges, are separately classified in the
financial statements. The accumulated balance of other
comprehensive income is reported separately from retained
earnings and additional paid-in capital in the equity section of
the balance sheet. Total comprehensive income consists of net
income and other accumulated comprehensive income disclosed in
the equity section of the balance sheet.
F-7
SS&C
Technologies Holdings, Inc. and subsidiaries
Notes to condensed consolidated financial statements
(unaudited)(continued)
The following table sets forth the components of comprehensive
income (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
23,237
|
|
|
$
|
12,996
|
|
Foreign currency translation gains
|
|
|
5,536
|
|
|
|
29,410
|
|
Change in unrealized loss on interest rate swaps, net of tax
|
|
|
1,771
|
|
|
|
1,021
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive income
|
|
$
|
30,544
|
|
|
$
|
43,427
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.
|
Basic and diluted
earnings per share
|
Earnings per share (EPS) is calculated in accordance
with relevant accounting guidance as follows: Basic earnings per
share includes no dilution and is computed by dividing income
available to the Companys common stockholders by the
weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the
period. Diluted earnings per share is computed by dividing net
income by the weighted average number of common and common
equivalent shares outstanding during the period. Common
equivalent shares consist of stock options using the treasury
stock method. Common equivalent shares are excluded from the
computation of diluted earnings per share if the effect of
including such common equivalent shares is antidilutive because
their assumed proceeds exceed the average fair value of common
stock.
The following table sets forth the weighted average common
shares used in the computation of basic and diluted earnings per
share (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine months ended
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average common shares outstanding
|
|
|
67,919
|
|
|
|
60,378
|
|
Weighted average common stock equivalentsoptions
|
|
|
3,580
|
|
|
|
2,754
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average common and common equivalent shares outstanding
|
|
|
71,499
|
|
|
|
63,132
|
|
|
|
Options to purchase 1,500,319 and 311,417 shares were
outstanding for the nine months ended September 30, 2010
and 2009, respectively, but were not included in the computation
of diluted earnings per share because the effect of including
the options would be antidilutive.
F-8
SS&C
Technologies Holdings, Inc. and subsidiaries
Notes to condensed consolidated financial statements
(unaudited)(continued)
At September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, debt
consisted of the following (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
|
Senior credit facility, revolving portion
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
2,000
|
|
Senior credit facility, term loan portion, weighted-average
interest rate of 2.52% and 2.39%, respectively
|
|
|
157,072
|
|
|
|
190,032
|
|
113/4% senior
subordinated notes due 2013
|
|
|
133,250
|
|
|
|
205,000
|
|
Capital leases
|
|
|
82
|
|
|
|
227
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
290,404
|
|
|
|
397,259
|
|
Short-term borrowings and current portion of long-term debt
|
|
|
(1,719
|
)
|
|
|
(4,270
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt
|
|
$
|
288,685
|
|
|
$
|
392,989
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capitalized financing costs of $1.6 million and
$1.7 million were amortized to interest expense during the
nine months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively.
The estimated fair value of the Companys senior
subordinated notes due 2013 was $138.9 million and
$217.3 million at September 30, 2010 and
December 31, 2009, respectively. The carrying value of the
Companys senior credit facility approximates its fair
value given the variable rate nature of the debt.
In April 2010, the Company issued a notice of redemption for
$71.75 million in principal amount of its outstanding
113/4% senior
subordinated notes due 2013 at a redemption price of 105.875% of
the principal amount, plus accrued and unpaid interest on such
amount to, but excluding, May 24, 2010, the day such
redemption was completed. The Company recorded a loss on
extinguishment of debt of $5.5 million in connection with
the redemption, which includes the redemption premium of
$4.2 million and $1.3 million of capitalized financing
costs.
|
|
7.
|
Derivatives and
Hedging Activities
|
The Company uses interest rate swap agreements to manage a
portion of its floating rate debt and follows the provisions of
the accounting standards for derivative instruments and hedging
activities, which requires that all derivative instruments be
recorded on the balance sheet at fair value.
Quarterly variable interest payments were recognized as an
increase in interest expense as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine months ended September 30,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate swap
|
|
$
|
3,352
|
|
|
$
|
2,815
|
|
|
|
F-9
SS&C
Technologies Holdings, Inc. and subsidiaries
Notes to condensed consolidated financial statements
(unaudited)(continued)
Changes in the fair value of the interest rate swaps are not
included in earnings but are reported as a component of
accumulated other comprehensive income (AOCI). For
the nine months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009, the
change in the fair value of the interest rate swaps was as
follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine months ended
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
|
Amount of gain recognized in AOCI, net of tax
|
|
$
|
1,771
|
|
|
$
|
1,021
|
|
|
|
The market value of the swaps recorded in AOCI may be recognized
in the statement of operations if certain terms of the senior
credit facility change, if the loan is extinguished or if the
swap agreements are terminated prior to maturity. As of
September 30, 2010, the Company held one
receive-variable/pay-fixed interest rate swap with a notional
value of $100.0 million, which expires on December 31,
2010.
The Company follows the provisions of the accounting standard
for fair value measurements with respect to the valuation of its
interest rate swap agreements. The fair value measurement
standard clarifies how companies are required to use a fair
value measure for recognition and disclosure by establishing a
common definition of fair value, a framework for measuring fair
value, and expanding disclosures about fair value measurements.
The accounting standard for fair value measurements and
disclosure establishes a three-tier fair value hierarchy, which
prioritizes the inputs used in measuring fair value. These tiers
include: Level 1, defined as observable inputs such as
quoted prices in active markets; Level 2, defined as inputs
other than quoted prices in active markets that are either
directly or indirectly observable; and Level 3, defined as
unobservable inputs in which little or no market data exists,
therefore requiring an entity to develop its own assumptions.
The Company determines the fair value of its interest rate swaps
based on the amount at which each could be settled, which is
referred to as the exit price. This price is based upon
observable market assumptions and appropriate valuation
adjustments for credit risk. The Company has categorized its
interest rate swaps as Level 2. The fair value of the
Companys remaining interest rate swap was a liability of
$1.1 million and $4.2 million at September 30,
2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively, which are
included in other accrued expenses in the accompanying condensed
consolidated financial statements.
As of December 31, 2009, the Companys contingent
consideration liability associated with TheNextRound, Inc.
(TNR) of $1.0 million was measured at fair
value using estimated future cash flows based on the potential
payments of the liability based on the unobservable input of the
estimated post-acquisition financial results of TNR through May
2011. During the nine months ended September 30, 2010, the
Company reduced this liability to its current fair value of
$0.2 million. The adjustment of $0.8 million was
recorded to other income.
F-10
SS&C
Technologies Holdings, Inc. and subsidiaries
Notes to condensed consolidated financial statements
(unaudited)(continued)
|
|
8.
|
Commitments and
contingencies
|
From time to time, the Company is subject to legal proceedings
and claims that arise in the normal course of its business. In
the opinion of management, the Company is not involved in any
litigation or proceedings by third parties that management
believes could have a material adverse effect on the Company or
its business.
On February 3, 2010, the Company purchased substantially
all of the assets and related business associated with the
Geller Investment Partnership Services (GIPS)
division of Geller & Company LLC for approximately
$12.2 million in cash, plus the assumption of certain
liabilities. GIPS provides accounting and reporting,
performance, tax, administrative and investor services for
private equity funds, funds of hedge funds and limited partners
that invest in alternative asset classes.
The net assets and results of operations of GIPS have been
included in the Companys consolidated financial statements
from February 4, 2010. The purchase price was allocated to
tangible and intangible assets based on their fair value at the
date of acquisition. The fair value of the intangible assets,
consisting of customer relationships and contracts, was
determined using the income approach. Specifically, the
discounted cash flows method was utilized for the contractual
relationships. The intangible assets are amortized each year
based on the ratio that the projected cash flows for the
intangible asset bear to the total of current and expected
future cash flows for the intangible asset. The contractual
relationships are amortized over approximately six years, the
estimated life of the asset. A portion of the purchase price was
attributed to the settlement of a $1.0 million liability
associated with the Companys acquisition of TNR. The
remainder of the purchase price was allocated to goodwill.
The following summarizes the preliminary allocation of the
purchase price, net of the $1.0 million described above,
for the acquisition of GIPS (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable
|
|
$
|
1,680
|
|
Tangible assets acquired, net of cash received
|
|
|
32
|
|
Acquired customer relationships and contracts
|
|
|
2,500
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
8,404
|
|
Deferred revenue
|
|
|
(1,126
|
)
|
Other liabilities assumed
|
|
|
(118
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consideration paid, net of cash received
|
|
$
|
11,372
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Company reported revenues of $4.9 million from GIPS
from the acquisition date through September 30, 2010. The
following unaudited pro forma condensed consolidated results of
operations are provided for illustrative purposes only and
assume that the acquisitions of Evare, LLC (Evare),
Unisys Corporations MAXIMIS software
(MAXIMIS), TNR, Tradeware Global Corp
(Tradeware), and GIPS occurred on January 1,
2009. This unaudited pro forma information (in thousands) should
not be relied upon as being indicative of the historical results
F-11
SS&C
Technologies Holdings, Inc. and subsidiaries
Notes to condensed consolidated financial statements
(unaudited)(continued)
that would have been obtained if the acquisition had actually
occurred on that date, or of the results that may be obtained in
the future.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine months ended September 30,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
$
|
243,451
|
|
|
$
|
229,581
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
23,313
|
|
|
$
|
15,067
|
|
Basic earnings per share
|
|
$
|
0.34
|
|
|
$
|
0.25
|
|
Basic weighted average number of common shares outstanding
|
|
|
67,919
|
|
|
|
60,378
|
|
Diluted earnings per share
|
|
$
|
0.33
|
|
|
$
|
0.24
|
|
Diluted weighted average number of common and common equivalent
shares outstanding
|
|
|
71,499
|
|
|
|
63,132
|
|
|
|
The change in carrying value of goodwill for the nine months
ended September 30, 2010 was as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2009
|
|
$
|
885,517
|
|
2010 acquisition
|
|
|
8,404
|
|
Adjustments to previous acquisitions
|
|
|
(352
|
)
|
Income tax benefit on rollover options exercised
|
|
|
(3,873
|
)
|
Effect of foreign currency translation
|
|
|
5,486
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at September 30, 2010
|
|
$
|
895,182
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11.
|
Product and
geographic sales information
|
The Company operates in one reportable segment. The
Company attributes net sales to an individual country based upon
location of the customer. The Company manages its business
primarily on a geographic basis. The Companys geographic
regions consist of the United States, Canada, Americas excluding
the United States and Canada, Europe, Asia Pacific and Japan.
The European region includes European countries as well as the
Middle East and Africa.
F-12
SS&C
Technologies Holdings, Inc. and subsidiaries
Notes to condensed consolidated financial statements
(unaudited)(continued)
Revenues by geography were as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine months ended
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
|
United States
|
|
$
|
164,791
|
|
|
$
|
127,213
|
|
Canada
|
|
|
36,697
|
|
|
|
30,437
|
|
Americas excluding
|
|
|
4,962
|
|
|
|
5,924
|
|
United States and Canada
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Europe
|
|
|
30,597
|
|
|
|
30,723
|
|
Asia Pacific and Japan
|
|
|
5,748
|
|
|
|
5,573
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
242,795
|
|
|
$
|
199,870
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues by product group were as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine months ended September 30,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
|
Portfolio management/accounting
|
|
$
|
194,388
|
|
|
$
|
163,716
|
|
Trading/treasury operations
|
|
|
29,810
|
|
|
|
17,455
|
|
Financial modeling
|
|
|
6,905
|
|
|
|
6,592
|
|
Loan management/accounting
|
|
|
3,263
|
|
|
|
3,271
|
|
Property management
|
|
|
3,451
|
|
|
|
3,818
|
|
Money market processing
|
|
|
3,100
|
|
|
|
2,894
|
|
Training
|
|
|
1,878
|
|
|
|
2,124
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
242,795
|
|
|
$
|
199,870
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12.
|
Selected
quarterly financial data (unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First
|
|
|
Second
|
|
|
Third
|
|
(in thousands)
|
|
quarter
|
|
|
quarter
|
|
|
quarter
|
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue
|
|
$
|
78,174
|
|
|
$
|
81,618
|
|
|
$
|
83,003
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
39,012
|
|
|
|
40,678
|
|
|
|
40,666
|
|
Operating income
|
|
|
19,421
|
|
|
|
19,789
|
|
|
|
19,585
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
9,021
|
|
|
|
4,362
|
|
|
|
9,854
|
|
Basic earnings per share
|
|
$
|
0.15
|
|
|
$
|
0.06
|
|
|
$
|
0.14
|
|
Diluted earnings per share
|
|
$
|
0.14
|
|
|
$
|
0.06
|
|
|
$
|
0.13
|
|
|
|
F-13
SS&C
Technologies Holdings, Inc. and subsidiaries
Notes to condensed consolidated financial statements
(unaudited)(continued)
|
|
13.
|
Recent accounting
pronouncements
|
In October 2009, the FASB issued authoritative guidance related
to multiple-deliverable revenue arrangements. This updated
literature establishes the accounting and reporting guidance for
arrangements including multiple revenue-generating activities.
The standard provides amendments to the criteria for separating
deliverables, measuring and allocating arrangement consideration
to one or more units of accounting. The amendments in this
standard also establish a selling price hierarchy for
determining the selling price of a deliverable. Significantly
enhanced disclosures are also required to provide information
about a vendors multiple-deliverable revenue arrangements,
including information about the nature and terms, significant
deliverables, and its performance within arrangements. The
amendments also require disclosure regarding the significant
judgments made and changes to those judgments and regarding the
effect of the application of the relative selling-price method
on the timing or amount of revenue recognition. The Company
adopted the new requirements upon the effective date of the
guidance and such adoption did not affect the Companys
results of operations, cash flows or financial position.
On October 1, 2010, the Company purchased all of the
outstanding stock of thinkorswim Technologies, Inc.
(TOS) from TD Ameritrade Holding Corporation for
approximately $5.2 million in cash, plus the costs of
effecting the transaction and the assumption of certain
liabilities. TOS is an Internet-deployed trade order management
system, execution system, and liquidity engine that provides
connectivity to algorithmic trading systems. The net assets and
results of operations of TOS will be included in the
Companys consolidated financial statements from
October 1, 2010. The relevant business combination
disclosures will be included in our financial statements once
the preliminary accounting has been finalized.
F-14
Report
of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
To the Board of Directors and Stockholders of SS&C
Technologies Holdings, Inc.
In our opinion, the accompanying consolidated balance sheets and
the related consolidated statements of operations, of cash flows
and of stockholders equity present fairly, in all material
respects, the financial position of SS&C Technologies
Holdings, Inc. and its subsidiaries at December 31, 2009
and 2008 and the results of their operations and their cash
flows for the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007
in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in
the United States of America. In addition, in our opinion, the
financial statement schedule, Schedule I
condensed financial information of SS&C Technologies
Holdings, Inc., presents fairly, in all material respects, the
information set forth therein when read in conjunction with the
related consolidated financial statements. These financial
statements and financial statement schedule are the
responsibility of the Companys management. Our
responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial
statements and financial statement schedule based on our audits.
We conducted our audits of these statements and financial
statement schedule in accordance with the standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those
standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are
free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a
test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in
the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles
used and significant estimates made by management, and
evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We
believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our
opinion.
/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers
LLP
Hartford, Connecticut
February 22, 2010, except for Note 17(c), as to which the
date is March 11, 2010
F-15
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
(in thousands, except per share data)
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
|
ASSETS
|
Current assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
19,055
|
|
|
$
|
29,299
|
|
Accounts receivable, net of allowance for doubtful accounts of
$1,425 and $1,444, respectively (Note 3)
|
|
|
41,600
|
|
|
|
38,318
|
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets
|
|
|
6,164
|
|
|
|
4,327
|
|
Income taxes receivable
|
|
|
669
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred income taxes
|
|
|
1,780
|
|
|
|
3,777
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets
|
|
|
69,268
|
|
|
|
75,721
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property and equipment:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Leasehold improvements
|
|
|
5,358
|
|
|
|
4,852
|
|
Equipment, furniture, and fixtures
|
|
|
25,915
|
|
|
|
20,978
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31,273
|
|
|
|
25,830
|
|
Less accumulated depreciation
|
|
|
(17,237
|
)
|
|
|
(11,800
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net property and equipment
|
|
|
14,036
|
|
|
|
14,030
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred income taxes
|
|
|
499
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
885,517
|
|
|
|
822,409
|
|
Intangible and other assets, net of accumulated amortization of
$116,670 and $82,520, respectively
|
|
|
216,321
|
|
|
|
215,193
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
1,185,641
|
|
|
$
|
1,127,353
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY
|
Current liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current portion of long-term debt (Note 6)
|
|
$
|
4,270
|
|
|
$
|
2,101
|
|
Accounts payable
|
|
|
4,804
|
|
|
|
1,821
|
|
Income taxes payable
|
|
|
703
|
|
|
|
4,898
|
|
Accrued employee compensation and benefits
|
|
|
14,693
|
|
|
|
13,640
|
|
Other accrued expenses
|
|
|
16,938
|
|
|
|
9,575
|
|
Interest payable
|
|
|
2,070
|
|
|
|
2,007
|
|
Deferred maintenance and other revenue
|
|
|
40,400
|
|
|
|
30,844
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities
|
|
|
83,878
|
|
|
|
64,886
|
|
Long-term debt, net of current portion (Note 6)
|
|
|
392,989
|
|
|
|
406,625
|
|
Other long-term liabilities
|
|
|
10,764
|
|
|
|
11,977
|
|
Deferred income taxes (Note 5)
|
|
|
52,023
|
|
|
|
56,612
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
539,654
|
|
|
|
540,100
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments and contingencies (Note 13)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders equity (Notes 4 and 10):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, $0.01 par value, 100,000 shares
authorized; 60,807 shares and 60,545 shares issued,
respectively and 60,400 shares and 60,350 shares
outstanding, respectively
|
|
|
608
|
|
|
|
605
|
|
Additional paid-in capital
|
|
|
587,293
|
|
|
|
579,691
|
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)
|
|
|
16,436
|
|
|
|
(17,890
|
)
|
Retained earnings
|
|
|
46,300
|
|
|
|
27,282
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
650,637
|
|
|
|
589,688
|
|
Less: cost of common stock in treasury, 407 shares and
195 shares, respectively
|
|
|
(4,650
|
)
|
|
|
(2,435
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity
|
|
|
645,987
|
|
|
|
587,253
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders equity
|
|
$
|
1,185,641
|
|
|
$
|
1,127,353
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an
integral part of these consolidated financial
statements.
F-16
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended December 31,
|
|
(in thousands)
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Software licenses
|
|
$
|
20,661
|
|
|
$
|
24,844
|
|
|
$
|
27,514
|
|
Maintenance
|
|
|
66,099
|
|
|
|
65,178
|
|
|
|
61,910
|
|
Professional services
|
|
|
20,889
|
|
|
|
24,352
|
|
|
|
17,491
|
|
Software-enabled services
|
|
|
163,266
|
|
|
|
165,632
|
|
|
|
141,253
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues
|
|
|
270,915
|
|
|
|
280,006
|
|
|
|
248,168
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of revenues:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Software licenses
|
|
|
8,499
|
|
|
|
9,198
|
|
|
|
9,616
|
|
Maintenance
|
|
|
27,559
|
|
|
|
26,854
|
|
|
|
26,038
|
|
Professional services
|
|
|
14,154
|
|
|
|
16,118
|
|
|
|
14,277
|
|
Software-enabled services
|
|
|
87,528
|
|
|
|
90,263
|
|
|
|
78,951
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total cost of revenues
|
|
|
137,740
|
|
|
|
142,433
|
|
|
|
128,882
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
133,175
|
|
|
|
137,573
|
|
|
|
119,286
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling and marketing
|
|
|
20,362
|
|
|
|
19,566
|
|
|
|
19,701
|
|
Research and development
|
|
|
26,513
|
|
|
|
26,804
|
|
|
|
26,282
|
|
General and administrative
|
|
|
19,197
|
|
|
|
26,120
|
|
|
|
24,573
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses
|
|
|
66,072
|
|
|
|
72,490
|
|
|
|
70,556
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income
|
|
|
67,103
|
|
|
|
65,083
|
|
|
|
48,730
|
|
Interest income
|
|
|
28
|
|
|
|
409
|
|
|
|
939
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
(36,891
|
)
|
|
|
(41,539
|
)
|
|
|
(45,463
|
)
|
Other (expense) income, net
|
|
|
(1,418
|
)
|
|
|
1,994
|
|
|
|
1,911
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes
|
|
|
28,822
|
|
|
|
25,947
|
|
|
|
6,117
|
|
Provision (benefit) for income taxes (Note 5)
|
|
|
9,804
|
|
|
|
7,146
|
|
|
|
(458
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
19,018
|
|
|
$
|
18,801
|
|
|
$
|
6,575
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic earnings per share
|
|
$
|
0.31
|
|
|
$
|
0.31
|
|
|
$
|
0.11
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic weighted average number of common shares outstanding
|
|
|
60,381
|
|
|
|
60,284
|
|
|
|
60,245
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted earnings per share
|
|
$
|
0.30
|
|
|
$
|
0.30
|
|
|
$
|
0.10
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted weighted average number of common and common equivalent
shares outstanding
|
|
|
63,653
|
|
|
|
63,700
|
|
|
|
63,382
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an
integral part of these consolidated financial
statements.
F-17
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended December 31,
|
|
(in thousands)
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flow from operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
19,018
|
|
|
$
|
18,801
|
|
|
$
|
6,575
|
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by
operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
36,028
|
|
|
|
35,038
|
|
|
|
35,047
|
|
Stock compensation expense
|
|
|
5,607
|
|
|
|
7,323
|
|
|
|
10,979
|
|
Foreign exchange gains on debt
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(768
|
)
|
Amortization of loan origination costs
|
|
|
2,306
|
|
|
|
2,328
|
|
|
|
2,317
|
|
Equity losses in long-term investment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,098
|
|
|
|
187
|
|
Loss on sale or disposition of property and equipment
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
105
|
|
Deferred income taxes
|
|
|
(8,861
|
)
|
|
|
(7,368
|
)
|
|
|
(6,115
|
)
|
Provision for doubtful accounts
|
|
|
213
|
|
|
|
865
|
|
|
|
336
|
|
Changes in operating assets and liabilities, excluding effects
from acquisitions:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable
|
|
|
3,360
|
|
|
|
(1,301
|
)
|
|
|
(6,635
|
)
|
Prepaid expenses and other assets
|
|
|
(284
|
)
|
|
|
(2,742
|
)
|
|
|
(1,723
|
)
|
Income taxes receivable and payable
|
|
|
(5,236
|
)
|
|
|
2,552
|
|
|
|
2,790
|
|
Accounts payable
|
|
|
1,549
|
|
|
|
(494
|
)
|
|
|
101
|
|
Accrued expenses
|
|
|
1,646
|
|
|
|
1,581
|
|
|
|
10,745
|
|
Deferred maintenance and other revenue
|
|
|
4,493
|
|
|
|
2,973
|
|
|
|
3,116
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities
|
|
|
59,852
|
|
|
|
61,655
|
|
|
|
57,057
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flow from investing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additions to property and equipment
|
|
|
(2,559
|
)
|
|
|
(6,746
|
)
|
|
|
(7,717
|
)
|
Proceeds from sale of property and equipment
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
Cash paid for business acquisitions, net of cash acquired
(Note 11)
|
|
|
(51,477
|
)
|
|
|
(17,864
|
)
|
|
|
(5,130
|
)
|
Additions to capitalized software
|
|
|
(101
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities
|
|
|
(54,134
|
)
|
|
|
(24,608
|
)
|
|
|
(12,839
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flow from financing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash received from other borrowings
|
|
|
2,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,200
|
|
Repayment of debt
|
|
|
(19,679
|
)
|
|
|
(25,574
|
)
|
|
|
(42,688
|
)
|
Exercise of stock options
|
|
|
1,998
|
|
|
|
2,398
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
Income tax benefit related to exercise of stock options
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
89
|
|
Purchase of common stock for treasury
|
|
|
(2,215
|
)
|
|
|
(2,357
|
)
|
|
|
(10
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in financing activities
|
|
|
(17,896
|
)
|
|
|
(25,532
|
)
|
|
|
(37,408
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash
|
|
|
1,934
|
|
|
|
(1,391
|
)
|
|
|
647
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
(10,244
|
)
|
|
|
10,124
|
|
|
|
7,457
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period
|
|
|
29,299
|
|
|
|
19,175
|
|
|
|
11,718
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period
|
|
$
|
19,055
|
|
|
$
|
29,299
|
|
|
$
|
19,175
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental disclosure of cash paid (refunded) for:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest
|
|
$
|
34,061
|
|
|
$
|
38,505
|
|
|
$
|
43,451
|
|
Income taxes, net
|
|
$
|
23,512
|
|
|
$
|
12,472
|
|
|
$
|
(1,627
|
)
|
Supplemental disclosure of non-cash investing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See Note 11 for a discussion of acquisitions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an
integral part of these consolidated financial
statements.
F-18
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
of Issued
|
|
|
|
|
|
Paid-in
|
|
|
Retained
|
|
|
Comprehensive
|
|
|
Treasury
|
|
|
Stockholders
|
|
|
Comprehensive
|
|
(in thousands)
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Capital
|
|
|
Earnings
|
|
|
Income (loss)
|
|
|
Stock
|
|
|
Equity
|
|
|
Income (Loss)
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, at December 31, 2006
|
|
|
60,252
|
|
|
$
|
603
|
|
|
$
|
558,992
|
|
|
$
|
1,906
|
|
|
$
|
1,699
|
|
|
$
|
(68
|
)
|
|
$
|
563,132
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,575
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,575
|
|
|
$
|
6,575
|
|
Foreign exchange translation adjustment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
34,490
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
34,490
|
|
|
|
34,490
|
|
Change in unrealized loss on interest rate swaps, net of tax
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,574
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,574
|
)
|
|
|
(2,574
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
38,491
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock-based compensation expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,979
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,979
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercise of options
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase of common stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(10
|
)
|
|
|
(10
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, at December 31, 2007
|
|
|
60,254
|
|
|
|
603
|
|
|
|
569,972
|
|
|
|
8,481
|
|
|
|
33,615
|
|
|
|
(78
|
)
|
|
|
612,593
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18,801
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18,801
|
|
|
$
|
18,801
|
|
Foreign exchange translation adjustment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(49,078
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(49,078
|
)
|
|
|
(49,078
|
)
|
Change in unrealized loss on interest rate swaps, net of tax
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,427
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,427
|
)
|
|
|
(2,427
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(32,704
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock-based compensation expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,323
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,323
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercise of options
|
|
|
291
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
2,396
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,398
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase of common stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,357
|
)
|
|
|
(2,357
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, at December 31, 2008
|
|
|
60,545
|
|
|
|
605
|
|
|
|
579,691
|
|
|
|
27,282
|
|
|
|
(17,890
|
)
|
|
|
(2,435
|
)
|
|
|
587,253
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19,018
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19,018
|
|
|
$
|
19,018
|
|
Foreign exchange translation adjustment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32,879
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32,879
|
|
|
|
32,879
|
|
Change in unrealized loss on interest rate swaps, net of tax
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,447
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,447
|
|
|
|
1,447
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
53,344
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock-based compensation expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,607
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,607
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercise of options
|
|
|
262
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
1,995
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,998
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase of common stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,215
|
)
|
|
|
(2,215
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, at December 31, 2009
|
|
|
60,807
|
|
|
$
|
608
|
|
|
$
|
587,293
|
|
|
$
|
46,300
|
|
|
$
|
16,436
|
|
|
$
|
(4,650
|
)
|
|
$
|
645,987
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an
integral part of these consolidated financial
statements.
F-19
SS&C Technologies Holdings, Inc. (Holdings or
the Company) was incorporated in Delaware on
July 26, 2005 and its principal activity is to hold its
investment in SS&C Technologies, Inc.
(SS&C). SS&C was acquired on
November 23, 2005 through a merger transaction. The
acquisition was accomplished through the merger of Sunshine
Merger Corporation, a wholly owned subsidiary of Holdings
(previously known as Sunshine Acquisition Corporation), into
SS&C, with SS&C being the surviving company and a
wholly owned subsidiary of Holdings (the
Transaction).
The Company provides software products and software-enabled
services to the financial services industry, primarily in North
America. The Company also has operations in the U.K., the
Netherlands, Malaysia, Ireland, Australia, the Netherlands
Antilles and Japan. The Companys portfolio of over 60
products and software-enabled services allows its clients to
automate and integrate front-office functions such as trading
and modeling, middle-office functions such as portfolio
management and reporting, and back-office functions such as
accounting, performance measurement, reconciliation, reporting,
processing and clearing. The Company provides its products and
related services in eight vertical markets in the financial
services industry:
1. Insurance and pension funds;
2. Asset management;
3. Alternative investments;
4. Financial markets;
5. Commercial lending;
6. Real estate property management;
7. Municipal finance; and
8. Treasury, banks and credit unions.
|
|
2.
|
Summary of
significant accounting policies
|
Use of
estimates
The preparation of the consolidated financial statements in
conformity with generally accepted accounting principles
requires management to make estimates and assumptions that
affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and the
disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of
the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues
and expenses during the reporting period. Estimates are used
for, but not limited to, collectibility of accounts receivable,
costs to complete certain contracts, valuation of acquired
assets and liabilities, valuation of stock options, income tax
accruals and the value of deferred tax assets. Estimates are
also used to determine the remaining economic lives and carrying
value of fixed assets, goodwill and intangible assets. Actual
results could differ from those estimates.
F-20
SS&C Technologies
Holdings, Inc. and subsidiaries
Notes to consolidated financial
statements(continued)
Principles of
consolidation
The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of
the Company and its subsidiaries. All significant accounts,
transactions and profits between the consolidated companies have
been eliminated in consolidation. Unconsolidated investments in
entities over which we do not have control but have the ability
to exercise influence over operating and financial policies are
accounted for under the equity method of accounting. Earnings
and losses from such investments are recorded on a pre-tax basis.
Revenue
recognition
The Companys payment terms for software licenses typically
require that the total fee be paid upon signing of the contract.
Maintenance services are typically due in full at the beginning
of the maintenance period. Professional services and
software-enabled services are typically due and payable monthly
in arrears. Normally the Companys arrangements do not
provide for any refund rights, and payments are not contingent
on specific milestones or customer acceptance conditions. For
arrangements that do contain such provisions, the Company defers
revenue until the rights or conditions have expired or have been
met.
Unbilled accounts receivable primarily relates to professional
services and software-enabled services revenue that has been
earned as of month end but is not invoiced until the subsequent
month, and to software license revenue that has been earned and
is realizable but not invoiced to clients until future dates
specified in the client contract.
Deferred revenue consists of payments received related to
product delivery, maintenance and other services, which have
been paid by customers prior to the recognition of revenue.
Deferred revenue relates primarily to cash received for
maintenance contracts in advance of services performed.
License
revenue
The Company follows the principles of accounting standards
relating to software revenue recognition, which provides
guidance on applying generally accepted accounting principles in
recognizing revenue on software transactions. Accounting
standards require that revenue recognized from software
transactions be allocated to each element of the transaction
based on the relative fair values of the elements, such as
software products, specified upgrades, enhancements,
post-contract client support, installation or training. The
determination of fair value is based upon vendor-specific
objective evidence (VSOE). The Company recognizes
software license revenues allocated to software products and
enhancements generally upon delivery of each of the related
products or enhancements, assuming all other revenue recognition
criteria are met. In the rare occasion that a software license
agreement includes the right to a specified upgrade or product,
the Company defers all revenues under the arrangement until the
specified upgrade or product is delivered, since typically VSOE
does not exist to support the fair value of the specified
upgrade or product.
The Company generally recognizes revenue from sales of software
or products including proprietary software upon product shipment
and receipt of a signed contract, provided that
F-21
SS&C Technologies
Holdings, Inc. and subsidiaries
Notes to consolidated financial
statements(continued)
collection is probable and all other revenue recognition
criteria are met. The Company sells perpetual software licenses
in conjunction with professional services for installation and
maintenance. For these arrangements, the total contract value is
attributed first to the maintenance arrangement based on its
fair value, which is derived from stated renewal rates. The
contract value is then attributed to professional services based
on estimated fair value, which is derived from the rates charged
for similar services provided on a stand-alone basis. The
Companys software license agreements generally do not
require significant modification or customization of the
underlying software, and, accordingly, implementation services
provided by the Company are not considered essential to the
functionality of the software. The remainder of the total
contract value is then attributed to the software license based
on the residual method.
The Company also sells term licenses ranging from one to seven
years, some of which include bundled maintenance services. For
those arrangements with bundled maintenance services, VSOE does
not exist for the maintenance element and therefore the total
fee is recognized ratably over the contractual term of the
arrangement. The Company classifies revenues from bundled term
license arrangements as both software licenses and maintenance
revenues by allocating a portion of the revenues from the
arrangement to maintenance revenues and classifying the
remainder in software licenses revenues. The Company uses its
renewal rates for maintenance under perpetual license agreements
for the purpose of determining the portion of the arrangement
fee that is classified as maintenance revenues.
The Company occasionally enters into license agreements
requiring significant customization of the Companys
software. The Company accounts for the license fees under these
agreements on the
percentage-of-completion
basis. This method requires estimates to be made for costs to
complete the agreement utilizing an estimate of development
man-hours
remaining. Revenue is recognized each period based on the hours
incurred to date compared to the total hours expected to
complete the project. Due to uncertainties inherent in the
estimation process, it is at least reasonably possible that
completion costs may be revised. Such revisions are recognized
in the period in which the revisions are determined. Provisions
for estimated losses on uncompleted contracts are determined on
a
contract-by-contract
basis, and are made in the period in which such losses are first
estimated or determined.
Maintenance
agreements
Maintenance agreements generally require the Company to provide
technical support and software updates (on a
when-and-if-available
basis) to its clients. Such services are generally provided
under one-year renewable contracts. Maintenance revenues are
recognized ratably over the term of the maintenance agreement.
Professional
services
The Company provides consulting and training services to its
clients. Revenues for such services are generally recognized
over the period during which the services are performed. The
Company typically charges for professional services on a time
and materials basis. However, some contracts are for a fixed
fee. For the fixed-fee arrangements, an estimate is made of the
total hours expected to be incurred to complete the project. Due
to uncertainties inherent in
F-22
SS&C Technologies
Holdings, Inc. and subsidiaries
Notes to consolidated financial
statements(continued)
the estimation process, it is at least reasonably possible that
completion costs may be revised. Such revisions are recognized
in the period in which the revisions are determined. Revenues
are recognized each period based on the hours incurred to date
compared to the total hours expected to complete the project.
Software-enabled services
The Companys software-enabled services arrangements make
its software application available to its clients for processing
of transactions. The software-enabled services arrangements
provide an alternative for clients who do not wish to install,
run and maintain complicated financial software. Under the
arrangements, the client does not have the right to take
possession of the software, rather, the Company agrees to
provide access to its applications, remote use of its equipment
to process transactions, access to clients data stored on
its equipment, and connectivity between its environment and the
clients computing systems. Software-enabled services
arrangements generally have terms of two to five years and
contain monthly or quarterly fixed payments, with additional
billing for increases in market value of a clients assets,
pricing and trading activity under certain contracts.
The Company recognizes software-enabled services revenues on a
monthly basis as the software-enabled services are provided and
when persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, the price is
fixed or determinable and collectibility is reasonably assured.
The Company does not recognize any revenue before services are
performed. Certain contracts contain additional fees for
increases in market value, pricing and trading activity.
Revenues related to these additional fees are recognized in the
month in which the activity occurs based upon the Companys
summarization of account information and trading volume.
Research and development
Research and development costs associated with computer software
are charged to expense as incurred. Capitalization of internally
developed computer software costs begins upon the establishment
of technological feasibility based on a working model. Net
capitalized software costs $0.1 million are included in the
December 31, 2009 and 2008 balance sheets, respectively,
under Intangible and other assets.
The Companys policy is to amortize these costs upon a
products general release to the client. Amortization of
capitalized software costs is calculated by the greater of
(a) the ratio that current gross revenues for a product
bear to the total of current and anticipated future gross
revenues for that product or (b) the straight-line method
over the remaining estimated economic life of the product,
including the period being reported on, typically two to six
years. It is reasonably possible that those estimates of
anticipated future gross revenues, the remaining estimated
economic life of the product, or both could be reduced
significantly due to competitive pressures. Amortization expense
related to capitalized software development costs was
$0.1 million for each of the years ended December 31,
2009, 2008 and 2007.
Stock-based
compensation
Using the fair value recognition provisions of relevant
accounting literature, stock-based compensation cost is measured
at the grant date based on the value of the award and is
F-23
SS&C Technologies
Holdings, Inc. and subsidiaries
Notes to consolidated financial
statements(continued)
recognized as expense over the appropriate service period.
Determining the fair value of stock-based awards requires
considerable judgment, including estimating the expected term of
stock options, expected volatility of the Companys stock
price, and the number of awards expected to be forfeited. In
addition, for stock-based awards where vesting is dependent upon
achieving certain operating performance goals, the Company
estimates the likelihood of achieving the performance goals.
Differences between actual results and these estimates could
have a material effect on the Companys financial results.
A deferred income tax asset is recorded over the vesting period
as stock compensation expense is recorded. The realizability of
the deferred tax asset is ultimately based on the actual value
of the stock-based award upon exercise. If the actual value is
lower than the fair value determined on the date of grant, then
there could be an income tax expense for the portion of the
deferred tax asset that is not realizable.
Other
income
Other income, net for 2009 consists primarily of foreign
currency translation losses of $1.5 million. Other income,
net for 2008 consists primarily of foreign currency translation
gains of $4.0 million, partially offset by a
$2.0 million loss relating to an investment in a private
company which is accounted for under the equity method of
accounting. Other income, net for 2007 consists primarily of
foreign currency translation gains of $0.6 million,
property tax refunds of $0.9 million and $0.4 million
related to the favorable settlement of a liability accrued at
the time of the Companys acquisition of Financial Models
in 2005.
Income
taxes
The Company accounts for income taxes in accordance with the
relevant accounting literature. An asset and liability approach
is used to recognize deferred tax assets and liabilities for the
future tax consequences of items that are recognized in its
financial statements and tax returns in different years. A
valuation allowance is established against net deferred tax
assets if, based on the weight of available evidence, it is more
likely than not that some or all of the net deferred tax assets
will not be realized.
The Company accounts for uncertain tax positions using a
two-step approach. The first step is to evaluate the tax
position for recognition by determining if the weight of
available evidence indicates it is more likely than not that the
position will be sustained on audit, including resolution of
related appeals or litigation processes, if any. The second step
is to measure the tax benefit as the largest amount which is
more than 50% likely of being realized upon ultimate settlement.
The Company considers many factors when evaluating and
estimating its tax positions and tax benefits, which may require
periodic adjustments and which may not accurately forecast
actual outcomes.
Cash and cash
equivalents
The Company considers all highly liquid marketable securities
with original maturities of three months or less at the date of
acquisition to be cash equivalents. The Company did not hold any
cash equivalents at December 31, 2009 or 2008.
F-24
SS&C Technologies
Holdings, Inc. and subsidiaries
Notes to consolidated financial
statements(continued)
Property and
equipment
Property and equipment are stated at cost. Depreciation of
property and equipment is calculated using a combination of
straight-line and accelerated methods over the estimated useful
lives of the assets as follows:
|
|
|
|
Description
|
|
Useful life
|
|
|
Equipment
|
|
3-5 years
|
Furniture and fixtures
|
|
7-10 years
|
Leasehold improvements
|
|
Shorter of lease
term or estimated useful life
|
|
|
Depreciation expense for the years ended December 31, 2009,
2008 and 2007 was $4.9 million, $4.9 million and
$5.1 million, respectively.
Maintenance and repairs are expensed as incurred. The costs of
sold or retired assets are removed from the related asset and
accumulated depreciation accounts and any gain or loss is
included in other income, net.
Registration
costs
During the year ended December 31, 2009, the Company
incurred a total of $0.7 million in professional fees and
other costs related to the planned initial public offering of
its common stock. These costs are recorded in prepaid expenses
and other current assets in the consolidated balance sheet at
December 31, 2009. The offering was filed on
December 28, 2009. During the year ended December 31,
2008, the Company expensed a total of $1.6 million in
costs, which are included in general and administrative
expenses, that had been incurred related to the prior proposed
initial public offering of its common stock as a result of
uncertainty related to the planned offering. The Company
withdrew that proposed offering in October 2008.
Goodwill and
intangible assets
The Company tests goodwill annually on
December 31st for impairment (and in interim periods
if certain events occur or circumstances change that would more
likely than not reduce the fair value of a reporting unit below
its carrying amount). The Company has completed the required
impairment tests for goodwill and has determined that no
impairment existed as of December 31, 2009 or 2008. There
were no indefinite-lived intangible assets as of
December 31, 2009 or 2008.
F-25
SS&C Technologies
Holdings, Inc. and subsidiaries
Notes to consolidated financial
statements(continued)
The following table summarizes changes in goodwill (in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2007
|
|
$
|
860,690
|
|
2008 acquisition
|
|
|
8,937
|
|
Adjustments to previous acquisitions
|
|
|
2
|
|
Income tax benefit on Rollover options exercised
|
|
|
(578
|
)
|
Effect of foreign currency translation
|
|
|
(46,642
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2008
|
|
|
822,409
|
|
2009 acquisitions
|
|
|
30,123
|
|
Adjustments to previous acquisitions
|
|
|
(147
|
)
|
Income tax benefit on Rollover options exercised
|
|
|
(118
|
)
|
Effect of foreign currency translation
|
|
|
33,250
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2009
|
|
$
|
885,517
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Completed technology and other identifiable intangible assets
are amortized over lives ranging from three to 15 years
based on the ratio that current cash flows for the intangible
asset bear to the total of current and expected future cash
flows for the intangible asset. Amortization expense associated
with completed technology and other amortizable intangible
assets was $31.0 million, $30.0 million and
$29.8 million for the years ended December 31, 2009,
2008 and 2007, respectively.
A summary of the components of intangible assets is as follows
(in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
|
Customer relationships
|
|
$
|
233,505
|
|
|
$
|
207,757
|
|
Completed technology
|
|
|
68,166
|
|
|
|
58,046
|
|
Trade names
|
|
|
18,276
|
|
|
|
17,391
|
|
Other
|
|
|
2,299
|
|
|
|
2,016
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
322,246
|
|
|
|
285,210
|
|
Less: accumulated amortization
|
|
|
(116,245
|
)
|
|
|
(82,236
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
206,001
|
|
|
$
|
202,974
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-26
SS&C Technologies
Holdings, Inc. and subsidiaries
Notes to consolidated financial
statements(continued)
Total estimated amortization expense, related to intangible
assets, for each of the next five years, as of December 31,
2009, is expected to approximate (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ending December
31,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
$
|
34,123
|
|
2011
|
|
|
32,345
|
|
2012
|
|
|
29,877
|
|
2013
|
|
|
27,263
|
|
2014
|
|
|
24,792
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
148,400
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impairment of
long-lived assets
The Company evaluates the recoverability of its long-lived
assets when there is evidence that events or changes in
circumstances have made recovery of the assets carrying
value unlikely. An impairment loss would be recognized when the
sum of the expected future undiscounted net cash flows is less
than the carrying amount of the asset. The Company has
identified no such impairment losses. Substantially all of the
Companys long-lived assets are located in the United
States and Canada.
Concentration of
credit risk
Financial instruments, which potentially subject the Company to
concentrations of credit risk, consist principally of cash, cash
equivalents, marketable securities, and trade receivables. The
Company has cash investment policies that limit investments to
investment grade securities. Concentrations of credit risk, with
respect to trade receivables, are limited due to the fact that
the Companys client base is highly diversified. As of
December 31, 2009 and 2008, the Company had no significant
concentrations of credit.
International
operations and foreign currency
The functional currency of each foreign subsidiary is the local
currency. Accordingly, assets and liabilities of foreign
subsidiaries are translated to U.S. dollars at period-end
exchange rates, and capital stock accounts are translated at
historical rates. Revenues and expenses are translated using the
average rates during the period. The resulting translation
adjustments are excluded from net earnings and accumulated as a
separate component of stockholders equity. Foreign
currency transaction gains and losses are included within other
income (expense) in the results of operations in the periods in
which they occur.
Derivative
instruments
The Company uses derivative instruments, consisting of interest
rate swaps, to manage interest rate risk associated with the
variable interest rate on its bank credit facility. The
Companys objective in managing interest rate risk is to
manage volatility in the effective cost of debt. The
F-27
SS&C Technologies
Holdings, Inc. and subsidiaries
Notes to consolidated financial
statements(continued)
Company accounts for its derivative instruments and hedging
activities in accordance with relevant accounting standards and
all derivative instruments are recorded at fair value.
In order for derivative instruments to qualify for hedge
accounting, the underlying hedged item must expose the Company
to risks associated with market fluctuations and the financial
instrument used as a hedge must reduce the Companys
exposure to market fluctuation throughout the hedge period. If
these criteria are not met, a change in the market value of the
financial instrument is recognized as a gain or loss and is
recorded as a component of interest expense in the period of
change. The Company excludes the change in the time value of
money when assessing the effectiveness of the hedging
relationship. All derivatives are evaluated quarterly.
Derivative instruments entered into by the Company qualify for
hedge accounting and are designated as cash flow hedges. Cash
flow hedges are hedges of forecasted transactions or the
variability of cash flows to be received or paid related to a
recognized asset or liability. For cash flow hedge transactions,
changes in the fair value of the derivative instrument are
reported in other comprehensive income. The gains and losses on
cash flow hedge transactions reported in other comprehensive
income are effectively reclassified to earnings in the periods
in which earnings are affected by the variability of the cash
flows of the hedged item.
Net interest paid or received pursuant to the derivative
instruments is included as a component of interest expense in
the period. Pending interest settlements earned/incurred on
derivative instruments held at the end of a period are also
included as a component of interest expense and in the
accompanying consolidated balance sheet. See Note 6 for
further disclosure related to the Companys derivative
instruments.
Comprehensive
income
Items defined as comprehensive income, such as foreign currency
translation adjustments and unrealized gains (losses) on
interest rate swaps qualifying as hedges, are separately
classified in the financial statements. The accumulated balance
of other comprehensive income is reported separately from
retained earnings and additional paid-in capital in the equity
section of the balance sheet. Total comprehensive income
consists of net income and other accumulated comprehensive
income disclosed in the equity section of the balance sheet.
At December 31, 2009, the Company had a balance of
$19.2 million in foreign currency translation gains and a
balance of $2.8 million (net of taxes of $1.4 million)
in unrealized losses on interest rate swaps. At
December 31, 2008, the Company had a balance of
$13.6 million in foreign currency translation losses and a
balance of $4.3 million (net of taxes of $2.3 million)
in unrealized losses on interest rate swaps.
Reclassifications
Certain amounts in prior year consolidated financial statements
have been reclassified to be comparable with current year
presentation. These reclassifications have had no effect on net
income or net equity.
F-28
SS&C Technologies
Holdings, Inc. and subsidiaries
Notes to consolidated financial
statements(continued)
Recent accounting
pronouncements
In October 2009, the Financial Accounting Standards Board
(FASB) issued an authoritative literature update
relating to multiple-deliverable revenue arrangements. This
updated literature establishes the accounting and reporting
guidance for arrangements including multiple revenue-generating
activities. The standard provides amendments to the criteria for
separating deliverables, measuring and allocating arrangement
consideration to one or more units of accounting. The amendments
in this standard also establish a selling price hierarchy for
determining the selling price of a deliverable. Significantly
enhanced disclosures are also required to provide information
about a vendors multiple-deliverable revenue arrangements,
including information about the nature and terms, significant
deliverables, and its performance within arrangements. The
amendments also require providing information about the
significant judgments made and changes to those judgments and
about how the application of the relative selling-price method
affects the timing or amount of revenue recognition. These
amendments are effective prospectively for revenue arrangements
entered into or materially modified in the fiscal years
beginning on or after June 15, 2010. Early application is
permitted. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of
this new standard.
In June 2009, the FASB issued The FASB Accounting
Standards Codification (Codification) and the Hierarchy of
GAAP, which establishes the Codification as the single
source of authoritative U.S. GAAP recognized by the FASB to
be applied by nongovernmental entities. SEC rules and
interpretive releases are also sources of authoritative GAAP for
SEC registrants. The Codification modifies the GAAP hierarchy to
include only two levels of GAAP: authoritative and
nonauthoritative. The Company adopted the Codification in July
2009 and its issuance did not affect the Companys results
of operations, cash flows or financial position since it is not
intended to change or alter existing GAAP.
In May 2009, the FASB issued new accounting guidance related to
the accounting and disclosures of subsequent events. This
guidance establishes general standards of accounting for, and
disclosure of, events that occur after the balance sheet date
but before financial statements are issued or are available to
be issued. The Company adopted this guidance upon issuance and
such adoption did not have a material impact on its results of
operations, cash flows or financial position.
In April 2009, the FASB issued new accounting guidance related
to interim disclosures about the fair values of financial
instruments, which requires disclosures about fair value of
financial instruments not measured on the balance sheet at fair
value in interim financial statements as well as in annual
financial statements. Prior to this, fair values for these
assets and liabilities were only disclosed annually. This new
accounting guidance requires all entities to disclose the
method(s) and significant assumptions used to estimate the fair
value of financial instruments. The Company adopted this
guidance upon issuance and such adoption did not have a material
impact on its results of operations, cash flows or financial
position.
Basic and diluted
earnings per share
Earnings per share is calculated in accordance with the relevant
standards. Basic earnings per share includes no dilution and is
computed by dividing income available to the Companys
F-29
SS&C Technologies
Holdings, Inc. and subsidiaries
Notes to consolidated financial
statements(continued)
common stockholders by the weighted average number of common
shares outstanding during the period. Diluted earnings per share
is computed by dividing net income by the weighted average
number of common and common equivalent shares outstanding during
the period. Common equivalent shares consist of stock options
using the treasury stock method. Common equivalent shares are
excluded from the computation of diluted earnings per share if
the effect of including such common equivalent shares is
antidilutive because their exercise prices exceed the fair value
of common stock.
The following table sets forth the weighted average common
shares used in the computation of basic and diluted earnings per
share (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average common shares outstandingused in
calculation of basic earnings per share
|
|
|
60,381
|
|
|
|
60,284
|
|
|
|
60,245
|
|
Weighted average common stock equivalentsoptions
|
|
|
3,272
|
|
|
|
3,416
|
|
|
|
3,137
|
|
Weighted average common and common equivalent shares
outstandingused in calculation of diluted earnings per
share
|
|
|
63,653
|
|
|
|
63,700
|
|
|
|
63,382
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options to purchase 95,479, 82,807 and 0 shares were
outstanding at December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007,
respectively, but were not included in the computation of
diluted earnings per share because the effect of including the
options would be antidilutive.
Accounts receivable are as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable
|
|
$
|
30,838
|
|
|
$
|
28,785
|
|
Unbilled accounts receivable
|
|
|
12,187
|
|
|
|
10,977
|
|
Allowance for doubtful accounts
|
|
|
(1,425
|
)
|
|
|
(1,444
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total accounts receivable
|
|
$
|
41,600
|
|
|
$
|
38,318
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-30
SS&C Technologies
Holdings, Inc. and subsidiaries
Notes to consolidated financial
statements(continued)
The following table represents the activity for the allowance
for doubtful accounts during the years ended December 31,
2009, 2008 and 2007 (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended December 31,
|
|
Allowance for doubtful
accounts:
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at beginning of period
|
|
$
|
1,444
|
|
|
$
|
1,223
|
|
|
$
|
1,638
|
|
Charge to costs and expenses
|
|
|
213
|
|
|
|
865
|
|
|
|
336
|
|
Write-offs, net of recoveries
|
|
|
(313
|
)
|
|
|
(524
|
)
|
|
|
(812
|
)
|
Other adjustments
|
|
|
81
|
|
|
|
(120
|
)
|
|
|
61
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at end of period
|
|
$
|
1,425
|
|
|
$
|
1,444
|
|
|
$
|
1,223
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Management establishes the allowance for doubtful accounts based
on historical bad debt experience. In addition, management
analyzes client accounts, client concentrations, client
creditworthiness, current economic trends and changes in the
clients payment terms when evaluating the adequacy of the
allowance for doubtful accounts.
At December 31, 2009, 100,000,000 shares of common
stock were authorized and 60,807,379 and 60,400,052 shares
of common stock were issued and outstanding, respectively. At
December 31, 2008, 100,000,000 shares of common stock
were authorized and 60,544,792 and 60,350,415 shares of
common stock were issued and outstanding, respectively.
During the year ended December 31, 2009, the Company
repurchased 212,950 shares of common stock at an average
price of $10.40 per share. During the year ended
December 31, 2008, the Company repurchased
185,809 shares of common stock at an average price of
$12.68 per share.
The sources of income before income taxes were as follows (in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
|
U.S.
|
|
$
|
9,749
|
|
|
$
|
6,671
|
|
|
$
|
(11,417
|
)
|
Foreign
|
|
|
19,073
|
|
|
|
19,276
|
|
|
|
17,534
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes
|
|
$
|
28,822
|
|
|
$
|
25,947
|
|
|
$
|
6,117
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-31
SS&C Technologies
Holdings, Inc. and subsidiaries
Notes to consolidated financial
statements(continued)
The income tax provision (benefit) consists of the following (in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
|
Current:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal
|
|
$
|
8,334
|
|
|
$
|
6,580
|
|
|
$
|
460
|
|
Foreign
|
|
|
8,727
|
|
|
|
7,746
|
|
|
|
4,406
|
|
State
|
|
|
1,559
|
|
|
|
94
|
|
|
|
99
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
18,620
|
|
|
|
14,420
|
|
|
|
4,965
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal
|
|
|
(8,063
|
)
|
|
|
(7,129
|
)
|
|
|
(6,262
|
)
|
Foreign
|
|
|
(1,902
|
)
|
|
|
(1,602
|
)
|
|
|
441
|
|
State
|
|
|
1,149
|
|
|
|
1,457
|
|
|
|
398
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
(8,816
|
)
|
|
|
(7,274
|
)
|
|
|
(5,423
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
9,804
|
|
|
$
|
7,146
|
|
|
$
|
(458
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The reconciliation between the expected tax expense and the
actual tax provision (benefit) is computed by applying the
U.S. federal corporate income tax rate of 35% to income
before income taxes as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
|
Computed expected tax expense
|
|
$
|
10,087
|
|
|
$
|
9,081
|
|
|
$
|
2,141
|
|
Increase (decrease) in income tax expense resulting from:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
State income taxes (net of federal income tax benefit)
|
|
|
1,775
|
|
|
|
1,008
|
|
|
|
321
|
|
Foreign operations
|
|
|
(2,258
|
)
|
|
|
(2,333
|
)
|
|
|
(1,883
|
)
|
Rate change impact on tax liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(581
|
)
|
|
|
(1,536
|
)
|
Uncertain tax positions
|
|
|
466
|
|
|
|
702
|
|
|
|
646
|
|
Other
|
|
|
(266
|
)
|
|
|
(731
|
)
|
|
|
(147
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provision (benefit) for income taxes
|
|
$
|
9,804
|
|
|
$
|
7,146
|
|
|
$
|
(458
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-32
SS&C Technologies
Holdings, Inc. and subsidiaries
Notes to consolidated financial
statements(continued)
The components of deferred income taxes at December 31,
2009 and 2008 are as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
Deferred
|
|
|
Deferred
|
|
|
Deferred
|
|
|
Deferred
|
|
|
|
tax
|
|
|
tax
|
|
|
tax
|
|
|
tax
|
|
|
|
assets
|
|
|
liabilities
|
|
|
assets
|
|
|
liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred compensation
|
|
$
|
9,186
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
6,327
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Interest rate swap
|
|
|
1,736
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,382
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued expenses
|
|
|
1,720
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
898
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net operating loss carryforwards
|
|
|
1,449
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,512
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tax credit carryforwards
|
|
|
1,333
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
237
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchased in-process research and development
|
|
|
1,002
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,251
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impaired investment interest
|
|
|
860
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
738
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
454
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
345
|
|
Acquired technology
|
|
|
126
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
691
|
|
Property and equipment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
932
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
468
|
|
Trade names
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,004
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,750
|
|
Other intangible assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,316
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,122
|
|
Customer relationships
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
54,156
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
51,232
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
17,866
|
|
|
|
66,408
|
|
|
|
17,345
|
|
|
|
65,608
|
|
Valuation allowance
|
|
|
(1,202
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,572
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
16,664
|
|
|
$
|
66,408
|
|
|
$
|
12,773
|
|
|
$
|
65,608
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At December 31, 2009, the Company has not accrued deferred
income taxes of $12.2 million on unremitted earnings from
non-U.S. subsidiaries
as such earnings are expected to be reinvested overseas and used
to service Canadian debt.
The reduction in net operating loss carryforwards of
$4.1 million was attributable to the expiration of a
certain domestic state net operating loss carryforwards of
$53.4 million. At December 31, 2009, the Company had
foreign net operating loss carryforwards other than Japan of
$4.2 million, which are available to offset foreign income
on an infinite carryforward basis. Japans net operating
loss carryforward of $0.4 million begins to expire in 2010.
At December 31, 2009, the Company believes that the
recorded domestic state income tax credit carryforward of
$1.3 million will be utilized before the state income tax
credit carryforward starts to expire in 2011.
The Company has recorded valuation allowances of
$1.2 million and $4.6 million at December 31,
2009 and 2008 related to net operating loss carryforwards and
tax credits in certain state and foreign jurisdictions. The
reduction in the valuation allowance of $3.4 million was
due primarily to the expiration of state net operating loss
carryforwards.
F-33
SS&C Technologies
Holdings, Inc. and subsidiaries
Notes to consolidated financial
statements(continued)
The following table summarizes the activity related to the
Companys unrecognized tax benefits for the years ended
December 31, 2009 and 2008 (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at January 1, 2008
|
|
$
|
6,457
|
|
Increases related to current year tax positions
|
|
|
375
|
|
Lapse of statute of limitation
|
|
|
(19
|
)
|
Foreign exchange translation adjustment
|
|
|
(1,020
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2008
|
|
|
5,793
|
|
Increases related to current year tax positions
|
|
|
759
|
|
Settlements with tax authorities
|
|
|
(262
|
)
|
Lapse of statute of limitation
|
|
|
(30
|
)
|
Foreign exchange translation adjustment
|
|
|
723
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2009
|
|
$
|
6,983
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Company accrued potential penalties and interest on the
unrecognized tax benefits of $0.6 million and
$0.3 million during 2009 and 2008, respectively, and has
recorded a total liability for potential penalties and interest
of $1.3 million and $0.5 million at December 31,
2009 and 2008, respectively. Unrecognized tax benefits of
approximately $3.6 million are likely to be recognized
within the next 12 months due to a lapse of the statute of
limitation. These unrecognized tax benefits relate to deductions
primarily claimed on tax returns that could be reclassified as
capitalized acquisition costs. The Companys unrecognized
tax benefits as of December 31, 2009 relate to domestic and
foreign taxing jurisdictions.
The Company is subject to examination by tax authorities
throughout the world, including such major jurisdictions as the
U.S., Canada, Connecticut and New York. In these major
jurisdictions, the Company is no longer subject to examination
by tax authorities for years prior to 2002, 2005, 2004 and 2004,
respectively. The Companys U.S. federal income tax
returns are currently under audit for the tax periods ended
December 31, 2003 and 2004 and November 23, 2005. The
Companys Canadian tax returns are currently under audit
for tax periods ended December 31, 2006 and 2007.
F-34
SS&C Technologies
Holdings, Inc. and subsidiaries
Notes to consolidated financial
statements(continued)
|
|
6.
|
Debt, derivative
instruments, and capital leases
|
At December 31, 2009 and 2008, debt consisted of the
following (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
|
Senior credit facility, revolving portion(A)
|
|
$
|
2,000
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Senior credit facility, term loan portion, weighted-average
interest rate of 2.39% and 3.54%, respectively(A)
|
|
|
190,032
|
|
|
|
203,726
|
|
113/4% senior
subordinated notes due 2013(B)
|
|
|
205,000
|
|
|
|
205,000
|
|
Capital leases
|
|
|
227
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
397,259
|
|
|
|
408,726
|
|
Short-term borrowings and current portion of long-term debt
|
|
|
(4,270
|
)
|
|
|
(2,101
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt
|
|
$
|
392,989
|
|
|
$
|
406,625
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
On November 23, 2005, in connection with the Transaction,
the Company (i) entered into a new $350 million credit
facility, consisting of a $200 million term loan facility
with SS&C as the borrower, a $75 million-equivalent
term loan facility with a Canadian subsidiary as the borrower
($17 million of which is denominated in U.S. dollars
and $58 million of which is denominated in Canadian
dollars) and a $75 million revolving credit facility, of
which $10 million was immediately drawn ($5 million of
which is denominated in U.S. dollars and $5 million of
which is denominated in Canadian dollars) and (ii) issued
$205 million aggregate principal amount of senior
subordinated notes. The portion of the term loan facility
denominated in Canadian dollars was $41.9 million and
$36.5 million at December 31, 2009 and 2008,
respectively. The Company capitalized financing costs of
approximately $17.2 million associated with these
facilities. Costs of $8.5 million associated with the
credit facility are being amortized over a period of seven
years. Costs of $8.7 million associated with the senior
subordinated notes are being amortized over a period of eight
years. Costs of $2.3 million were amortized to interest
expense in each of the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008
and 2007. The unamortized balance of capitalized financing costs
is included in intangible and other assets in the Companys
consolidated balance sheets.
|
|
(A)
|
Senior credit
facilities
|
Borrowings under the senior credit facilities bear interest at
either a floating base rate or a Eurocurrency rate plus, in each
case, an applicable margin. In addition, the Company pays a
commitment fee in respect of unused revolving commitments at a
rate that will be adjusted based on its leverage ratio. The
initial commitment fee rate is 0.5% per annum. The Company is
obligated to make quarterly principal payments on the term loan
of approximately $2.0 million per year. Subject to certain
exceptions, thresholds and other limitations, the Company is
required to prepay outstanding loans under its senior credit
facilities with the net proceeds of certain asset dispositions
and certain debt issuances and 50% of its excess cash flow (as
defined in the agreements governing the senior credit
facilities), which percentage will be reduced based on the
Company reaching certain leverage ratio thresholds.
F-35
SS&C Technologies
Holdings, Inc. and subsidiaries
Notes to consolidated financial
statements(continued)
The obligations under the senior credit facilities are
guaranteed by all of SS&Cs existing and future wholly
owned U.S. subsidiaries and by Holdings, with certain
exceptions as set forth in the credit agreement. The obligations
of the Canadian borrower are guaranteed by SS&C, each of
its U.S. and Canadian subsidiaries and Holdings, with
certain exceptions as set forth in the credit agreement.
Obligations under the senior credit facilities are secured by a
perfected first priority security interest in all of
SS&Cs capital stock and all of the capital stock or
other equity interests held by Holdings, SS&C and each of
SS&Cs existing and future U.S. subsidiary
guarantors (subject to certain limitations for equity interests
of foreign subsidiaries and other exceptions as set forth in the
credit agreement) and all of Holdings and SS&Cs
tangible and intangible assets and the tangible and intangible
assets of each of SS&Cs existing and future
U.S. subsidiary guarantors, with certain exceptions as set
forth in the credit agreement. The Canadian borrowers
borrowings under the senior credit facilities and all guarantees
thereof are secured by a perfected first priority security
interest in all of SS&Cs capital stock and all of the
capital stock or other equity interests held by Holdings,
SS&C and each of SS&Cs existing and future
U.S. and Canadian subsidiary guarantors, with certain
exceptions as set forth in the credit agreement, and all of
Holdings and SS&Cs tangible and intangible
assets and the tangible and intangible assets of each of
SS&Cs existing and future U.S. and Canadian
subsidiary guarantors, with certain exceptions as set forth in
the credit agreement.
The senior credit facilities contain a number of covenants that,
among other things, restrict, subject to certain exceptions,
Holdings, SS&Cs and most of SS&Cs
subsidiaries ability to incur additional indebtedness, pay
dividends and distributions on capital stock, create liens on
assets, enter into sale and lease-back transactions, repay
subordinated indebtedness, make capital expenditures, engage in
certain transactions with affiliates, dispose of assets and
engage in mergers or acquisitions. In addition, under the senior
credit facilities, the Company is required to satisfy and
maintain a maximum total leverage ratio and a minimum interest
coverage ratio. As of December 31, 2009, the Company was in
compliance with the financial and non-financial covenants.
The Company uses interest rate swap agreements to manage the
floating rate portion of its debt portfolio. An interest rate
swap is a contractual agreement to exchange payments based on
underlying interest rates. In November 2005, the Company entered
into three interest rate swap agreements which fixed the
interest rates for $181.9 million of its variable rate
debt. Two of the Companys swap agreements, one denominated
in U.S. dollars with a notional value of $50.0 million
and one denominated in Canadian dollars with a remaining
notional value of approximately $31.9 million
U.S. dollars, expired on December 31, 2008. Under
these agreements, the Company was required to pay the
counterparty a stream of fixed interest payments of 4.71% and
3.93%, respectively, and in turn, receive variable interest
payments based on LIBOR and the Canadian dollar Bankers
Acceptances, respectively, from the counterparty. The
Companys third swap agreement is denominated in
U.S. dollars, has a notional value of $100.0 million
and expires on December 31, 2010. Under this agreement, the
Company is required to pay the counterparty a stream of fixed
interest payments of 4.78% and in turn, receive variable
interest payments based on LIBOR (0.26% at December 31,
2009) from the counterparty. The net receipt or payment
from the interest rate swap agreements is recorded in interest
expense and increased net interest expense by $4.0 million
and $1.9 million during the years ended December 31,
2009 and 2008, respectively, and decreased interest
F-36
SS&C Technologies
Holdings, Inc. and subsidiaries
Notes to consolidated financial
statements(continued)
expense by $1.2 million during the year ended
December 31, 2007. The interest rate swaps are designated
and qualify as cash flow hedges under relevant accounting
guidance. As such, the swaps are accounted for as assets and
liabilities in the consolidated balance sheet at fair value.
For the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007, the
Company recorded an unrealized gain of $1.4 million, and
unrealized losses of $2.4 million and $2.6 million,
respectively, net of tax, in other comprehensive income related
to the change in fair value of the swaps. There is no income
statement impact from changes in the fair value of the swap
agreements as the hedges have been assessed to have no
ineffectiveness. The fair value of the swaps recorded in other
comprehensive income may be recognized in the statement of
operations if certain terms of the senior credit facility
change, if the loan is extinguished or if the swaps agreements
are terminated prior to maturity.
|
|
(B)
|
11
3/4% Senior
subordinated notes due 2013
|
The
113/4% senior
subordinated notes due 2013 are unsecured senior subordinated
obligations of SS&C that are subordinated in right of
payment to all existing and future senior debt of SS&C,
including the senior credit facilities. The senior subordinated
notes will be pari passu in right of payment to all
future senior subordinated debt of SS&C. The senior
subordinated notes are jointly and severally fully and
unconditionally guaranteed on an unsecured senior subordinated
basis by all existing and future direct and indirect domestic
subsidiaries of SS&C that guarantee the obligations under
the senior credit facilities or any of SS&Cs other
indebtedness or the indebtedness of the guarantors.
The senior subordinated notes are redeemable in whole or in
part, at SS&Cs option, at any time at varying
redemption prices that generally include premiums, which are
defined in the indenture. In addition, upon a change of control,
SS&C is required to make an offer to redeem all of the
senior subordinated notes at a redemption price equal to 101% of
the aggregate principal amount thereof plus accrued and unpaid
interest.
The indenture governing the senior subordinated notes contains a
number of covenants that restrict, subject to certain
exceptions, SS&Cs ability and the ability of its
restricted subsidiaries to incur additional indebtedness, pay
dividends, make certain investments, create liens, dispose of
certain assets and engage in mergers or acquisitions. Although
the indenture generally limits the ability of Holdings to obtain
funds from its subsidiaries, whether by dividend or loan, the
indenture permits SS&C, after an initial public offering of
Holdings, to pay dividends to Holdings in an amount not to
exceed in any fiscal year 6% of the net proceeds received by
SS&C through a contribution to equity capital from such
offering to enable Holdings to pay dividends to its
stockholders. An event of default under the senior credit
facility that leads to an acceleration of those amounts due also
results in a default under the indenture governing the senior
subordinated notes. As of December 31, 2009, SS&C was
in compliance with the financial covenants.
F-37
SS&C Technologies
Holdings, Inc. and subsidiaries
Notes to consolidated financial
statements(continued)
At December 31, 2009, annual maturities of long-term debt
and capital leases during the next five years and thereafter are
as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ending December
31,
|
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
$
|
4,270
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2,022
|
|
2012
|
|
|
185,967
|
|
2013
|
|
|
205,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
397,259
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7.
|
Fair value
measurements
|
The Company adopted the requirements of the Fair Value
Measurements and Disclosure Topic as of January 1, 2008,
with the exception of the application to non-recurring
nonfinancial assets and nonfinancial liabilities, which was
delayed and therefore adopted as of January 1, 2009. As of
December 31, 2009, The Company does not have any
significant nonfinancial assets and nonfinancial liabilities
that are measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis.
Valuation Hierarchy. The authoritative guidance
relating to fair value measurements and disclosure establishes a
valuation hierarchy for disclosure of the inputs to the
valuations used to measure fair value. This hierarchy
prioritizes the inputs into three broad levels as follows.
Level 1 inputs are quoted prices (unadjusted) in active
markets for identical assets or liabilities. Level 2 inputs
are quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active
markets, quoted prices for identical or similar assets in
markets that are not active, inputs other than quoted prices
that are observable for the asset or liability, including
interest rates, yield curves and credit risks, or inputs that
are derived principally from or corroborated by observable
market data through correlation. Level 3 inputs are
unobservable inputs based on our own assumptions used to measure
assets and liabilities at fair value. A financial asset or
liabilitys classification within the hierarchy is
determined based on the lowest level input that is significant
to the fair value measurement.
The following table provides the assets and liabilities carried
at fair value measured on a recurring basis as of
December 31, 2009 and 2008 (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair values at December 31,
2009
|
|
Level 1
|
|
|
Level 2
|
|
|
Level 3
|
|
|
|
|
Assets
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivative financial instrument
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
4,159
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Contingent consideration
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
4,159
|
|
|
$
|
1,000
|
|
|
|
F-38
SS&C Technologies
Holdings, Inc. and subsidiaries
Notes to consolidated financial
statements(continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair values at December 31,
2008
|
|
Level 1
|
|
|
Level 2
|
|
|
Level 3
|
|
|
|
|
Assets
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivative financial instrument
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
6,644
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
Valuation Techniques. The Company determines the
fair value of its interest rate swaps based on the amount at
which it could be settled, or the exit price. This price is
based upon observable market assumptions and appropriate
valuation adjustments for credit risk. The Company has
categorized its interest rate swaps as Level 2 of the
valuation hierarchy based on inputs other than quoted prices in
active markets that are either directly or indirectly
observable. As of December 31, 2009 and 2008, there has not
been any significant impact to the fair value of our derivative
liability due to our own credit risk.
The Companys contingent consideration liability was
measured at fair value using estimated future cash flows based
on the potential payments of the liability based on the
unobservable input of the estimated post-acquisition financial
results of TNR through May 2011 (see Note 11).
The carrying amounts and fair values of financial instruments at
December 31, 2009 and 2008 are as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
Carrying
|
|
|
Fair
|
|
|
Carrying
|
|
|
Fair
|
|
|
|
amount
|
|
|
value
|
|
|
amount
|
|
|
value
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior credit facility
|
|
$
|
192,032
|
|
|
$
|
192,032
|
|
|
$
|
203,726
|
|
|
$
|
203,726
|
|
113/4% Senior
subordinated notes due 2013
|
|
|
205,000
|
|
|
|
217,300
|
|
|
|
205,000
|
|
|
|
180,154
|
|
|
|
The above fair values were computed based on comparable quoted
market prices or an estimate of the amount to be paid to
terminate or settle the agreement, as applicable. The fair
values of cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable, net,
short-term borrowings, and accounts payable approximate the
carrying amounts due to the short-term maturities of these
instruments.
The Company is obligated under noncancelable operating leases
for office space and office equipment. Total rental expense was
$9.7 million, $9.5 million and $9.0 million for
the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007,
respectively. The lease for the corporate facility in Windsor,
Connecticut expires in 2016. Future minimum lease payments under
the Companys
F-39
SS&C Technologies
Holdings, Inc. and subsidiaries
Notes to consolidated financial
statements(continued)
operating leases, excluding future sublease income, as of
December 31, 2009, are as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ending
December 31,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
$
|
9,486
|
|
2011
|
|
|
7,482
|
|
2012
|
|
|
6,008
|
|
2013
|
|
|
4,537
|
|
2014
|
|
|
2,595
|
|
2015 and thereafter
|
|
|
3,851
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
33,959
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Company subleases office space to other parties under
noncancelable leases. The Company received rental income under
these leases of $1.3 million, $1.4 million and
$1.5 million for the years ended December 31, 2009,
2008 and 2007, respectively.
Future minimum lease receipts under these leases as of
December 31, 2009 are as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ending
December 31,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
$
|
1,257
|
|
2011
|
|
|
1,257
|
|
2012
|
|
|
1,257
|
|
2013
|
|
|
1,257
|
|
2014
|
|
|
210
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
5,238
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9.
|
Defined
contribution plans
|
The Company has a 401(k) Retirement Plan (the Plan)
that covers substantially all domestic employees. Each employee
may elect to contribute to the Plan, through payroll deductions,
up to 20% of his or her salary, subject to certain limitations.
The Plan provides for a Company match of employees
contributions in an amount equal to 50% of an employees
contributions up to $3,000 per year. The Company offers
employees a selection of various public mutual funds but does
not include Company common stock as an investment option in its
Plan.
During the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007,
the Company incurred $1.4 million, $1.3 million and
$1.3 million, respectively, of matching contribution
expenses related to this plan.
F-40
SS&C Technologies
Holdings, Inc. and subsidiaries
Notes to consolidated financial
statements(continued)
|
|
10.
|
Stock Option and
Purchase Plans
|
In April 2008, the Companys board of directors adopted,
and its stockholders approved, an equity-based incentive plan
(the 2008 Plan), which authorizes equity awards to
be granted for up to 1,416,661 shares of the Companys
common stock. Under the 2008 Plan, which became effective in
July 2008, the exercise price of awards is set on the grant date
and may not be less than the fair market value per share on such
date. Generally, awards expire ten years from the date of grant.
The Company has not granted any options under the 2008 Plan.
In August 2006, the Companys board of directors adopted
the 2006 equity incentive plan (the Plan), which
authorizes equity awards to be granted for up to
11,173,819 shares of the Companys common stock. Under
the Plan, the exercise price of awards is set on the grant date
and may not be less than the fair market value per share on such
date. Generally, awards expire ten years from the date of grant.
The Company has granted both time-based and performance-based
options under the Plan.
Time-based options granted upon adoption of the Plan vested 25%
on November 23, 2006 and 1/36th of the remaining
balance each month thereafter for 36 months. Time-based
options granted thereafter generally vest 25% on the first
anniversary of the grant date and 1/36th of the remaining
balance each month thereafter for 36 months. All time-based
options can vest upon a change in control, subject to certain
conditions. Time-based options granted during 2009 and 2007 have
a weighted-average grant date fair value of $3.34 and $4.18 per
share, respectively, based on the Black-Scholes option pricing
model. There were no time-based options granted during 2008.
Compensation expense is recorded on a straight-line basis over
the requisite service period, with the exception of the options
granted upon adoption of the Plan, for which the first 25% was
recorded between the grant date and November 23, 2006 to
mirror the vesting. The fair value of time-based options vested
during the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007 was
approximately $3.0 million, $3.4 million and
$3.6 million, respectively. At December 31, 2009,
there was approximately $1.1 million of unearned non-cash
stock-based compensation related to time-based options that the
Company expects to recognize as expense over a weighted average
remaining period of approximately three years.
Certain performance-based options granted under the Plan vest
upon the attainment of annual EBITDA targets for the Company
during the five fiscal year periods following the date of grant.
For purposes of Note 10 and Note 17, references to
EBITDA mean the Companys Consolidated EBITDA, as further
adjusted to exclude acquired EBITDA and cost savings. EBITDA in
excess of the EBITDA target in any given year shall be applied
to the EBITDA of any previous year for which the EBITDA target
was not met in full such that attainment of a prior year EBITDA
target can be achieved subsequently. In the event all EBITDA
targets of previous years were met in full, the excess EBITDA
shall be applied to the EBITDA of future years. These
performance-based options can also vest upon a change in
control, subject to certain conditions. There were no such
performance-based options granted during 2009 or 2008.
Performance-based options of this type granted during 2007 have
a weighted-average grant date fair value of $4.43 per share,
respectively, based on the Black-Scholes option pricing model.
Compensation expense is recorded at the time that the attainment
of the annual and cumulative EBITDA targets becomes probable. In
April 2007, the Companys board of directors approved
(i) the vesting, as of
F-41
SS&C Technologies
Holdings, Inc. and subsidiaries
Notes to consolidated financial
statements(continued)
April 18, 2007, of 50% of the performance-based options
granted to the Companys employees through March 31,
2007 that would have vested if the Company had met its EBITDA
target for fiscal year 2006 (collectively, the 2006
Performance Options); (ii) the vesting, conditioned
upon the Companys meeting its EBITDA target for fiscal
year 2007, of the other 50% of the 2006 Performance Options; and
(iii) the reduction of the Companys EBITDA target for
fiscal year 2007. The Company re-measured those awards using the
Black-Scholes option-pricing model and assumptions reflecting
current facts and circumstances as of the modification date. As
of the modification date, the Company estimated the fair value
of the modified performance-based options to be $5.35. In
estimating the common stock value, the Company used several
methods, including the income approach, guideline company method
and comparable transaction method. The Company used the
following assumptions to estimate the value of the modified
performance-based options: expected term to exercise of
3.5 years; expected volatility of 41.0%; risk-free interest
rate of 4.57%; and no dividend yield. Expected volatility is
based on a combination of the Companys historical
volatility adjusted for the Transaction and historical
volatility of the Companys peer group. Expected term to
exercise is based on the Companys historical stock option
exercise experience, adjusted for the Transaction. In March
2008, the Companys board of directors approved
(i) the vesting, conditioned upon the Companys EBITDA
for 2008 falling within the targeted range, of the 2006 and 2007
performance-based options that did not otherwise vest during
2006 or 2007, and (ii) the reduction of the Companys
annual EBITDA target range for 2008. As of that date, the
Company estimated the weighted-average fair value of its
performance-based options that vest upon the attainment of the
2008 EBITDA target range to be $4.83. In estimating the common
stock value, the Company valued the Company using several
methods, including the income approach, guideline company method
and comparable transaction method. The Company used the
following weighted-average assumptions to estimate the option
value: expected term to exercise of 2.5 years; expected
volatility of 26.0%; risk-free interest rate of 1.735%; and no
dividend yield. Expected volatility is based on the historical
volatility of the Companys peer group. Expected term to
exercise is based on the Companys historical stock option
exercise experience, adjusted for the Transaction. In February
2009, the Companys board of directors approved the vesting
of the 2006, 2007 and 2008 performance-based options that did
not otherwise vest during 2008 and established the
Companys annual EBITDA target range for 2009. As of that
date, the Company estimated the weighted-average fair value of
the performance-based options that were vested by the board and
those that vest upon the attainment of the 2009 EBITDA target
range to be $3.65. In estimating the common stock value, the
Company valued the Company using the income approach and the
guideline company method. The Company used the following
weighted-average assumptions to estimate the option value:
expected term to exercise of 2.5 years; expected volatility
of 38.0%; risk-free interest rate of 1.2%; and no dividend
yield. Expected volatility is based on the historical volatility
of the Companys peer group. Expected term to exercise is
based on the Companys historical stock option exercise
experience, adjusted for the Transaction.
The fair value of these performance-based options vested during
the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007 was
approximately $2.6 million, $3.9 million and
$7.4 million, respectively. At December 31, 2009,
there was approximately $2.7 million of unearned non-cash
stock-based compensation that the Company could recognize as
expense over approximately the next one year when and if the
attainment of the future EBITDA targets becomes probable.
F-42
SS&C Technologies
Holdings, Inc. and subsidiaries
Notes to consolidated financial
statements(continued)
For the time-based and performance-based options valued using
the Black-Scholes option-pricing model, the Company used the
following weighted-average assumptions:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Performance-based
|
|
|
|
Time-based awards
|
|
|
awards
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
|
Expected term to exercise (years)
|
|
|
4.0
|
|
|
|
4.0
|
|
|
|
4.5
|
|
Expected volatility
|
|
|
34.24%
|
|
|
|
45.85%
|
|
|
|
45.85%
|
|
Risk-free interest rate
|
|
|
1.89%
|
|
|
|
4.57%
|
|
|
|
4.57%
|
|
Expected dividend yield
|
|
|
0%
|
|
|
|
0%
|
|
|
|
0%
|
|
|
|
Expected volatility is based on a combination of the
Companys historical volatility adjusted for the
Transaction and historical volatility of the Companys peer
group. Expected term to exercise is based on the Companys
historical stock option exercise experience, adjusted for the
Transaction. There were no options granted during 2008 and no
performance-based options granted during 2009.
The remaining performance-based options vest only upon a change
in control in which certain internal rate of return targets are
attained. There were no such performance-based options granted
during 2009 or 2008. Performance-based options of this type
granted during 2007 have a weighted-average grant date fair
value of approximately $0.96 per share. Compensation expense
will be recorded at the time that a change in control becomes
probable. The Company did not record stock-based compensation
expense related to these options during the years ended
December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007. At December 31,
2009, there was approximately $4.1 million of unearned
non-cash stock-based compensation that the Company expects to
recognize when and if a change in control becomes probable.
The Company generally settles stock option exercises with newly
issued common shares.
F-43
SS&C Technologies
Holdings, Inc. and subsidiaries
Notes to consolidated financial
statements(continued)
The amount of stock-based compensation expense recognized in the
Companys consolidated statements of operations for the
years ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007 was as follows
(in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Statement of operations
classification
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of maintenance
|
|
$
|
114
|
|
|
$
|
142
|
|
|
$
|
257
|
|
Cost of professional services
|
|
|
208
|
|
|
|
240
|
|
|
|
343
|
|
Cost of software-enabled services
|
|
|
1,133
|
|
|
|
1,621
|
|
|
|
2,452
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total cost of revenues
|
|
|
1,455
|
|
|
|
2,003
|
|
|
|
3,052
|
|
Selling and marketing
|
|
|
954
|
|
|
|
1,184
|
|
|
|
1,803
|
|
Research and development
|
|
|
600
|
|
|
|
777
|
|
|
|
1,146
|
|
General and administrative
|
|
|
2,598
|
|
|
|
3,359
|
|
|
|
4,978
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses
|
|
|
4,152
|
|
|
|
5,320
|
|
|
|
7,927
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stock-based compensation expense
|
|
$
|
5,607
|
|
|
$
|
7,323
|
|
|
$
|
10,979
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The associated future income tax benefit recognized was
$2.9 million, $2.1 million and $3.2 million for
the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007,
respectively.
For the year ended December 31, 2009, the amount of cash
received from the exercise of stock options was less than
$0.1 million, with an associated tax benefit realized of
less than $0.1 million. The intrinsic value of options
exercised during the year ended December 31, 2009 was
approximately $0.8 million. For the year ended
December 31, 2008, the amount of cash received from the
exercise of stock options was less than $0.1 million, with
an associated tax benefit realized of less than
$0.1 million. The intrinsic value of options exercised
during the year ended December 31, 2008 was approximately
$1.3 million. For the year ended December 31, 2007,
the amount of cash received from the exercise of stock options
was less than $0.1 million, with an associated tax benefit
realized of less than $0.1 million. The intrinsic value of
options exercised during the year ended December 31, 2007
was less than $0.1 million.
F-44
SS&C Technologies
Holdings, Inc. and subsidiaries
Notes to consolidated financial
statements(continued)
The following table summarizes stock option transactions for the
years ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
exercise price
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at December 31, 2006
|
|
|
13,714,251
|
|
|
$
|
6.76
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
369,750
|
|
|
|
10.12
|
|
Cancelled/forfeited
|
|
|
(306,425
|
)
|
|
|
8.70
|
|
Exercised
|
|
|
(1,912
|
)
|
|
|
0.87
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at December 31, 2007
|
|
|
13,775,664
|
|
|
|
6.80
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cancelled/forfeited
|
|
|
(622,360
|
)
|
|
|
8.88
|
|
Exercised
|
|
|
(291,184
|
)
|
|
|
8.24
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at December 31, 2008
|
|
|
12,862,120
|
|
|
|
6.67
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
357,041
|
|
|
|
11.35
|
|
Cancelled/forfeited
|
|
|
(219,010
|
)
|
|
|
8.91
|
|
Exercised
|
|
|
(262,592
|
)
|
|
|
7.62
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at December 31, 2009
|
|
|
12,737,559
|
|
|
|
6.74
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following table summarizes information about stock options
outstanding that are expected to vest and stock options
outstanding that are exercisable at December 31, 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding, vested options currently exercisable
|
|
|
|
Outstanding options expected to vest
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
average
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
average
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
Aggregate
|
|
remaining
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
Aggregate
|
|
remaining
|
|
|
average
|
|
intrinsic
|
|
contractual
|
|
|
|
average
|
|
intrinsic
|
|
contractual
|
Shares
|
|
exercise price
|
|
value
|
|
term (years)
|
|
Shares
|
|
exercise price
|
|
value
|
|
term (years)
|
|
|
(in thousands)
|
|
|
|
(in thousands)
|
|
|
10,055,482
|
|
$
|
6.10
|
|
|
$
|
84,741
|
|
|
|
5.0
|
|
|
|
312,202
|
|
|
$
|
11.54
|
|
|
$
|
934
|
|
|
|
9.1
|
|
|
Tradeware Global
Corp.
On December 31, 2009, the Company acquired Tradeware Global
Corp. (Tradeware) for approximately
$22.4 million in cash, plus the costs of effecting the
transaction and the assumption of certain liabilities and net of
cash acquired. The acquisition was effected through the merger
of TG Acquisition Corp., a wholly-owned subsidiary of the
Company, with and into Tradeware, with Tradeware being the
surviving company and a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company.
Tradeware is a broker-neutral solution provider for electronic
access to global equity markets.
F-45
SS&C Technologies
Holdings, Inc. and subsidiaries
Notes to consolidated financial
statements(continued)
The net assets and results of operations of Tradeware have been
included in the Companys consolidated financial statements
from December 31, 2009. The purchase price was allocated to
tangible and intangible assets based on their fair value at the
date of acquisition. The fair value of the intangible assets,
consisting of completed technology, trade name, and client
relationships and client contracts, was determined using the
income approach. Specifically, the relief-from-royalty method
was utilized for the completed technology and trade name and the
discounted cash flows method was utilized for the contractual
relationships. The intangible assets are amortized each year
based on the ratio that current cash flows for the intangible
asset bear to the total of current and expected future cash
flows for the intangible asset. The completed technology is
amortized over approximately five years, the trade name is
amortized over approximately 10 years, and the contractual
relationships are amortized over approximately 12 years,
the estimated lives of the assets. The remainder of the purchase
price was allocated to goodwill and is tax deductible.
Due to the timing of the acquisition, there are no revenues from
Tradeware operations included in the statement of operations for
the year ended December 31, 2009.
TheNextRound,
Inc.
On November 19, 2009, the Company purchased all the
outstanding stock of TheNextRound, Inc. (TNR) for
approximately $18.7 million in cash, plus the costs of
effecting the transaction and the assumption of certain
liabilities and net of cash acquired. TNR provides front- and
back-office software solutions to the private equity and
alternative investment communities.
The net assets and results of operations of TNR have been
included in the Companys consolidated financial statements
from November 20, 2009. The purchase price was allocated to
tangible and intangible assets based on their fair value at the
date of acquisition. The fair value of the intangible assets,
consisting of completed technology, trade name, client
relationships and client contracts, and non-compete agreements,
was determined using the income approach. Specifically, the
relief-from-royalty method was utilized for the completed
technology and trade name and the discounted cash flows method
was utilized for the contractual relationships. The intangible
assets are amortized each year based on the ratio that current
cash flows for the intangible asset bear to the total of current
and expected future cash flows for the intangible asset. The
completed technology is amortized over approximately seven
years, the trade name is amortized over approximately
10 years, the client relationships are amortized over
approximately 13 years, and the non-compete agreements are
amortized over approximately 2 years, the estimated lives
of the assets. The Company has recorded a contingent
consideration liability of $1.0 million, which is based on
the attainment of certain revenue and EBITDA targets by the
acquired business through May 2011. The total possible
undiscounted payments could range from zero to
$6.5 million. In addition, the Company recorded a $1.0
million contingent liability, which was subsequently settled
concurrent with the GIPS acquisition. See Note 16 for
further disclosure related to the GIPS acquisition. The Company
was fully indemnified for this amount by the TNR shareholders.
The remainder of the purchase price was allocated to goodwill
and is tax deductible.
There are $0.9 million in revenues from TNR operations
included in the consolidated statement of operations for the
year ended December 31, 2009.
F-46
SS&C Technologies
Holdings, Inc. and subsidiaries
Notes to consolidated financial
statements(continued)
MAXIMIS
On May 29, 2009, the Company purchased the assets and
related business associated with Unisys Corporations
MAXIMIS software (MAXIMIS) for approximately
$6.9 million in cash, plus the assumption of certain
liabilities. MAXIMIS is a real-time, intranet-enabled investment
accounting application with comprehensive support for domestic
and international securities trading.
The net assets and results of operations of MAXIMIS have been
included in the Companys consolidated financial statements
from May 29, 2009. The purchase price was allocated to
tangible and intangible assets based on their fair value at the
date of acquisition. The fair value of the intangible assets,
consisting of completed technology, trade name, and client
relationships and client contracts, was determined using the
income approach. Specifically, the relief-from-royalty method
was utilized for the completed technology and trade name and the
discounted cash flows method was utilized for the contractual
relationships. The intangible assets are amortized each year
based on the ratio that current cash flows for the intangible
asset bear to the total of current and expected future cash
flows for the intangible asset. The completed technology is
amortized over approximately 5.5 years, the trade name is
amortized over approximately 7.5 years, and the contractual
relationships are amortized over approximately 6.5 years,
the estimated lives of the assets. The remainder of the purchase
price was allocated to goodwill and is tax deductible.
There are $3.7 million in revenues from MAXIMIS operations
included in the consolidated statement of operations for the
year ended December 31, 2009.
Evare,
LLC
On March 20, 2009, the Company purchased substantially all
the assets of Evare, LLC (Evare), for approximately
$3.6 million in cash, plus the costs of effecting the
transaction, and the assumption of certain liabilities. Evare is
a managed utility service provider for financial data
acquisition, enrichment, transformation and delivery.
The net assets and results of operations of Evare have been
included in the Companys consolidated financial statements
from March 21, 2009. The purchase price was allocated to
tangible and intangible assets based on their fair value at the
date of acquisition. The fair value of the intangible assets,
consisting of trade name and client relationships and client
contracts, was determined using the income approach.
Specifically, the relief-from-royalty method was utilized for
the trade name and the discounted cash flows method was utilized
for the contractual relationships. The intangible assets are
amortized each year based on the ratio that current cash flows
for the intangible asset bear to the total of current and
expected future cash flows for the intangible asset. The trade
name is amortized over approximately seven years, and the
contractual relationships are amortized over approximately four
years, the estimated lives of the assets. The remainder of the
purchase price was allocated to goodwill and is tax deductible.
There are $7.0 million in revenues from Evare operations
included in the consolidated statement of operations for the
year ended December 31, 2009.
F-47
SS&C Technologies
Holdings, Inc. and subsidiaries
Notes to consolidated financial
statements(continued)
Micro Design
Services, LLC
On October 1, 2008, the Company purchased substantially all
the assets of Micro Design Services, LLC (MDS) for
approximately $17.9 million in cash, plus the costs of
effecting the transaction, and the assumption of certain
liabilities. MDS specializes in the design and development of
real-time, mission-critical order routing and execution services
for equities, options and commodities exchanges and brokerage
firms. During the year ended December 31, 2009, the Company
received a $0.2 million reimbursement from the escrow
account established in connection with the acquisition of Micro
Design Services, LLC in October 2008.
The net assets and results of operations of MDS have been
included in the Companys consolidated financial statements
from October 1, 2008. The purchase price was allocated to
tangible and intangible assets based on their fair value at the
date of acquisition. The fair value of the intangible assets,
consisting of completed technology, trade name, and client
relationships and client contracts, was determined using the
income approach. Specifically, the relief-from-royalty method
was utilized for the completed technology and trade name and the
discounted cash flows method was utilized for the contractual
relationships. The intangible assets are amortized each year
based on the ratio that current cash flows for the intangible
asset bear to the total of current and expected future cash
flows for the intangible asset. The completed technology and
trade name are amortized over approximately six years, and the
contractual relationships are amortized over approximately eight
years, the estimated lives of the assets. The remainder of the
purchase price was allocated to goodwill.
Northport,
LLC
On March 12, 2007, the Company purchased substantially all
the assets of Northport, LLC (Northport) for
approximately $5.1 million in cash, plus the costs of
effecting the transaction, and the assumption of certain
liabilities. Northport provides accounting and management
services to private equity funds.
The net assets and results of operations of Northport have been
included in the Companys consolidated financial statements
from March 1, 2007. The purchase price was allocated to
tangible and intangible assets based on their fair value at the
date of acquisition. The fair value of the intangible assets,
consisting of client relationships and client contracts, was
determined using the future cash flows method. The intangible
assets are amortized each year based on the ratio that current
cash flows for the intangible asset bear to the total of current
and expected future cash flows for the intangible asset. The
intangible assets are amortized over approximately seven years,
the estimated life of the assets. The remainder of the purchase
price was allocated to goodwill.
F-48
SS&C Technologies
Holdings, Inc. and subsidiaries
Notes to consolidated financial
statements(continued)
The following summarizes the allocation of the purchase price
for the acquisitions of Tradeware, TheNextRound, MAXIMIS, Evare,
Micro Design Services and Northport (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TheNext
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Micro
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tradeware
|
|
|
Round
|
|
|
MAXIMIS
|
|
|
Evare
|
|
|
Design
|
|
|
Northport
|
|
|
|
|
Tangible assets acquired, net of cash received
|
|
$
|
1,795
|
|
|
$
|
1,155
|
|
|
$
|
143
|
|
|
$
|
1,090
|
|
|
$
|
1,216
|
|
|
$
|
708
|
|
Accounts receivable
|
|
|
1,212
|
|
|
|
3,362
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
928
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Completed technology
|
|
|
2,700
|
|
|
|
3,200
|
|
|
|
1,485
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,300
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trade names
|
|
|
300
|
|
|
|
200
|
|
|
|
110
|
|
|
|
150
|
|
|
|
155
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acquired client relationships and contracts
|
|
|
8,300
|
|
|
|
4,800
|
|
|
|
5,420
|
|
|
|
1,720
|
|
|
|
5,370
|
|
|
|
1,500
|
|
Non-compete agreements
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
15,727
|
|
|
|
13,075
|
|
|
|
821
|
|
|
|
500
|
|
|
|
8,790
|
|
|
|
3,303
|
|
Deferred revenue
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
(3,172
|
)
|
|
|
(965
|
)
|
|
|
(28
|
)
|
|
|
(114
|
)
|
|
|
(350
|
)
|
Deferred taxes
|
|
|
(3,344
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other liabilities assumed
|
|
|
(4,259
|
)
|
|
|
(3,999
|
)
|
|
|
(108
|
)
|
|
|
(810
|
)
|
|
|
(18
|
)
|
|
|
(31
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consideration paid, net of cash acquired
|
|
$
|
22,429
|
|
|
$
|
18,721
|
|
|
$
|
6,906
|
|
|
$
|
3,550
|
|
|
$
|
17,699
|
|
|
$
|
5,130
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The fair value of acquired accounts receivable balances
approximates the contractual amounts due from acquired
customers, except for approximately $1.0 million of
contractual amounts that are not expected to be collected as of
the acquisition date and that were also reserved by the company
acquired.
The goodwill associated with each of the transactions above is a
result of expected synergies from combining the operations of
businesses acquired with the Company and intangible assets that
do not qualify for separate recognition, such as an assembled
workforce.
The following unaudited pro forma condensed consolidated results
of operations is provided for illustrative purposes only and
assumes that the acquisitions of Tradeware, TheNextRound,
MAXIMIS, Evare, Micro Design Services and Northport occurred on
January 1, 2008. This unaudited pro forma information (in
thousands) should not be relied upon as being indicative of the
historical results that would have been obtained if these
acquisitions had actually occurred on that date, nor of the
results that may be obtained in the future.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
$
|
300,269
|
|
|
$
|
331,161
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
23,913
|
|
|
|
27,208
|
|
|
|
|
|
12.
|
Related party
transactions
|
The Company has agreed to pay TC Group, L.L.C. an annual fee of
$1.0 million for certain management services to be
performed by TC Group, L.L.C. following the Transaction and will
also pay Carlyle additional reasonable compensation for other
services provided by TC Group, L.L.C. to the Company from time
to time, including investment banking, financial advisory and
other services. Expenses of $1.1 million, $1.1 million
and $1.6 million in 2009, 2008 and 2007,
F-49
SS&C Technologies
Holdings, Inc. and subsidiaries
Notes to consolidated financial
statements(continued)
respectively, related to these services are included in general
and administrative expenses in the statement of operations.
In 2008, the Company agreed to provide fund administration
services to certain investment funds affiliated with The Carlyle
Group. The Company recorded revenues of $0.3 million and
$0.5 million under this arrangement during the years ended
December 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively.
In 2009, the Company agreed to provide processing services to
the Carlyle Investment Management L.L.C., including investment
accounting and data processing services. The agreement continues
until June 22, 2011. SS&C will be paid a monthly
charge based on annual rates derived from the net asset value of
Carlyle Investment Management L.L.C., subject to a minimum
monthly fee. SS&C will also receive other fees for certain
ancillary services that it provides under the agreement. In
2009, the Company recorded revenue of less than
$0.1 million under this arrangement.
|
|
13.
|
Commitments and
contingencies
|
From time to time, the Company is subject to certain other legal
proceedings and claims that arise in the normal course of its
business. In the opinion of management, the Company is not
involved in any litigation or proceedings by third parties that
management believes could have a material adverse effect on the
Company or its business.
|
|
14.
|
Product and
geographic sales information
|
The Company operates in one reportable segment. There were no
sales to any individual clients during the periods in the
three-year period ended December 31, 2009 that represented
10% or more of net sales. The Company attributes net sales to an
individual country based upon location of the client.
The Company manages its business primarily on a geographic
basis. The Companys reportable regions consist of the
United States, Canada, Americas excluding the United States and
Canada, Europe and Asia Pacific and Japan. The European region
includes European countries as well as the Middle East and
Africa.
The Company relies exclusively on its operations in the
Netherlands for sales of its Altair product. Total revenue
derived from this product was $2.3 million,
$2.7 million and $2.2 million in the years ended
December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007, respectively.
Revenues by geography were (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
|
United States
|
|
$
|
172,323
|
|
|
$
|
169,749
|
|
|
$
|
147,104
|
|
Canada
|
|
|
41,708
|
|
|
|
44,112
|
|
|
|
40,892
|
|
Americas, excluding United States and Canada
|
|
|
7,393
|
|
|
|
4,448
|
|
|
|
4,672
|
|
Europe
|
|
|
42,152
|
|
|
|
53,860
|
|
|
|
49,612
|
|
Asia-Pacific and Japan
|
|
|
7,339
|
|
|
|
7,837
|
|
|
|
5,888
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
270,915
|
|
|
$
|
280,006
|
|
|
$
|
248,168
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-50
SS&C Technologies
Holdings, Inc. and subsidiaries
Notes to consolidated financial
statements(continued)
Long-lived assets as of December 31, were (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
|
United States
|
|
$
|
18,146
|
|
|
$
|
20,107
|
|
Canada
|
|
|
4,906
|
|
|
|
5,132
|
|
Americas, excluding United States and Canada
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
141
|
|
Europe
|
|
|
460
|
|
|
|
300
|
|
Asia-Pacific and Japan
|
|
|
650
|
|
|
|
444
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
24,262
|
|
|
$
|
26,124
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues by product group were (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
|
Portfolio management/accounting
|
|
$
|
222,208
|
|
|
$
|
225,567
|
|
|
$
|
193,858
|
|
Trading/treasury operations
|
|
|
22,952
|
|
|
|
27,664
|
|
|
|
28,100
|
|
Financial modeling
|
|
|
8,475
|
|
|
|
8,685
|
|
|
|
8,919
|
|
Loan management/accounting
|
|
|
4,608
|
|
|
|
5,189
|
|
|
|
5,120
|
|
Property management
|
|
|
5,343
|
|
|
|
5,874
|
|
|
|
5,514
|
|
Money market processing
|
|
|
4,514
|
|
|
|
4,032
|
|
|
|
4,498
|
|
Training
|
|
|
2,815
|
|
|
|
2,995
|
|
|
|
2,159
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
270,915
|
|
|
$
|
280,006
|
|
|
$
|
248,168
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15.
|
Selected
quarterly financial data (unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First
|
|
|
Second
|
|
|
Third
|
|
|
Fourth
|
|
(in thousands)
|
|
quarter
|
|
|
quarter
|
|
|
quarter
|
|
|
quarter
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue
|
|
$
|
63,722
|
|
|
$
|
67,251
|
|
|
$
|
68,897
|
|
|
$
|
71,045
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
30,650
|
|
|
|
32,730
|
|
|
|
34,096
|
|
|
|
35,699
|
|
Operating income
|
|
|
14,473
|
|
|
|
15,835
|
|
|
|
17,663
|
|
|
|
19,132
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
3,898
|
|
|
|
3,491
|
|
|
|
5,607
|
|
|
|
6,022
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First
|
|
|
Second
|
|
|
Third
|
|
|
Fourth
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
quarter
|
|
|
quarter
|
|
|
quarter
|
|
|
quarter
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue
|
|
$
|
68,523
|
|
|
$
|
72,195
|
|
|
$
|
71,001
|
|
|
$
|
68,287
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
33,600
|
|
|
|
35,779
|
|
|
|
35,029
|
|
|
|
33,165
|
|
Operating income
|
|
|
15,822
|
|
|
|
17,276
|
|
|
|
15,579
|
|
|
|
16,406
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
3,736
|
|
|
|
3,786
|
|
|
|
4,810
|
|
|
|
6,469
|
|
|
|
F-51
SS&C Technologies
Holdings, Inc. and subsidiaries
Notes to consolidated financial
statements(continued)
On February 3, 2010, the Company purchased substantially
all the assets and related business associated with the Geller
Investment Partnership Services (GIPS) division of
Geller & Company LLC for approximately
$12.2 million in cash, plus the assumption of certain
liabilities. A portion of the purchase price is attributed to
the settlement of a $1.0 million liability associated with
the TNR acquisition. GIPS provides accounting and reporting,
performance, tax, administrative and investor services for
private equity funds, funds of hedge funds and limited partners
that invest in alternatives. The net assets and results of
operations of GIPS will be included in the Companys
consolidated financial statements from February 4, 2010.
The relevant business combination disclosures will be included
in the Companys financial statements once the preliminary
accounting has been finalized.
On February 4, 2010, the Companys compensation
committee, in anticipation of the Companys initial public
offering, amended the outstanding options under the 2006 equity
incentive plan to eliminate certain provisions of the options
that the Companys compensation committee believed were
more typical of private-company options than options of publicly
traded companies. Specifically, the Companys compensation
committee amended the options, effective upon the closing of the
offering, to provide for:
|
|
|
the conversion of the outstanding superior options granted under
the 2006 equity incentive plan into performance-based options
that vest based on EBITDA performance in 2010 and 2011, which
affects 1,680,868 outstanding options;
|
|
|
the elimination of pre-determined EBITDA ranges from the option
agreements and provision for the annual proposal of EBITDA
ranges by management, subject to approval by the Companys
board of directors, which EBITDA target range for 2010 was
established by the Companys board in a subsequent meeting
described below; and
|
|
|
the rolling over of performance-based options that
do not vest (in whole or in part) in any given year into
performance-based options for the following year, except as
otherwise provided by the Companys board of directors,
which affects 689,007 unvested performance-based options
outstanding, and would affect 1,680,868 outstanding superior
options, of which 701,497 are held by the Companys named
executive officers, that will be converted to performance-based
options upon the closing of this offering.
|
On February 16, 2010, the Company entered into an amended
and restated stock option agreement with William C. Stone, its
Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer, governing an
option that SS&C originally granted to Mr. Stone on
February 17, 2000 under its 1998 stock incentive plan.
Pursuant to the amended and restated stock option agreement, the
option (which was previously an option to purchase
637,500 shares of our common stock at an exercise price of
$0.87 per share) was amended to make it an option to purchase
637,500 shares of the Companys Class A
non-voting common stock at an exercise price of $0.87 per share.
F-52
SS&C Technologies
Holdings, Inc. and subsidiaries
Notes to consolidated financial
statements(continued)
(a) - Stock option modification (unaudited)
On February 24, 2010, the Companys board of directors
established the Companys annual EBITDA target range for
2010 and eliminated the previously established EBITDA target for
2011. The establishment of the 2010 EBITDA target range action
affected 1,512,781 options, of which 631,349 are held by the
Companys named executive officers, including 840,434
superior options, of which 350,749 are held by the
Companys named executive officers, that will be converted
to 2010 performance-based options upon the closing of this
offering. The total unearned non-cash stock-based compensation
cost related to the performance-based awards that vest based
upon achieving the 2010 EBITDA target, excluding the potential
conversion of superior options to performance-based options,
that the Company could recognize during 2010 is estimated to be
approximately $4.6 million. In addition, it is estimated
that the Company could record an expense of approximately
$5.8 million of non-cash stock-based compensation related
to the conversion of superior options to 2010 performance-based
options during 2010.
(b) - Issuance of financial statements (unaudited)
The Company has evaluated subsequent events through
February 25, 2010, which represents the date the financial
statements were issued.
(c) - Common stock split (audited)
On March 10, 2010, the Companys board of directors
approved an 8.5-for-1 stock split to be effected in the form of
a stock dividend and an increase in authorized shares to
100,000,000 shares of the Companys common stock and
5,000,000 shares of the Companys Class A
non-voting common stock, respectively. All share and per share
amounts presented have been retroactively restated to reflect
the stock split and increase in authorized shares.
(d) - Option grants (unaudited)
During 2010, options to purchase a total of
2,019,685 shares of the Companys common stock were
awarded to the Companys executive officers and certain of
the Companys
non-executive
officer employees, of which 1,615,085 were issued under the 2008
Plan and 404,600 were issued under the Plan. It is estimated
that the Company will record approximately $7.0 million of
non-cash
stock-based compensation expense over the next four years
related to these awards. The Company will finalize its
accounting for the options awarded during 2010 in connection
with its reporting during the quarter ending March 31, 2010.
F-53
Schedule I
condensed financial information
SS&C Technologies Holdings, Inc.
Parent company balance sheets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
(in thousands, except per share
data)
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
|
ASSETS
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Investments in subsidiaries
|
|
|
645,987
|
|
|
|
587,253
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
645,987
|
|
|
$
|
587,253
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY
|
Commitments and contingencies
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders equity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, $0.01 par value, 100,000 shares
authorized; 60,807 shares and 60,545 shares issued,
respectively, and 60,400 and 60,350 shares outstanding,
respectively
|
|
|
608
|
|
|
|
605
|
|
Additional paid-in capital
|
|
|
587,293
|
|
|
|
579,691
|
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income
|
|
|
16,436
|
|
|
|
(17,890
|
)
|
Retained earnings
|
|
|
46,300
|
|
|
|
27,282
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
650,637
|
|
|
|
589,688
|
|
Less: cost of common stock in treasury, 407 shares and
195 shares, respectively
|
|
|
(4,650
|
)
|
|
|
(2,435
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity
|
|
|
645,987
|
|
|
|
587,253
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders equity
|
|
$
|
645,987
|
|
|
$
|
587,253
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an
integral part of these financial statements.
F-54
SS&C
Technologies Holdings, Inc.
Parent company statements of operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended December 31,
|
|
(in thousands)
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Operating costs and expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity in net income of subsidiaries, net of tax
|
|
|
19,018
|
|
|
|
18,801
|
|
|
|
6,575
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
19,018
|
|
|
$
|
18,801
|
|
|
$
|
6,575
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an
integral part of these financial statements.
F-55
SS&C
Technologies Holdings, Inc.
Parent company statements of cash flows
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended December 31,
|
|
(in thousands)
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flow from operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
19,018
|
|
|
$
|
18,801
|
|
|
$
|
6,575
|
|
Equity in net income of subsidiaries, net of tax
|
|
|
(19,018
|
)
|
|
|
(18,801
|
)
|
|
|
(6,575
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental disclosure of cash paid for:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest paid
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Income tax refunds, net of payments
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Income taxes paid, net of refunds
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an
integral part of these financial statements.
F-56
SS&C
Technologies Holdings, Inc.
Parent company statements of changes in stockholders
equity
For the years ended December 31, 2007, 2008 and
2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
of Issued
|
|
|
|
|
|
Paid-in
|
|
|
Retained
|
|
|
Comprehensive
|
|
|
Treasury
|
|
|
Stockholders
|
|
|
Comprehensive
|
|
(in thousands)
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Capital
|
|
|
Earnings
|
|
|
Income (loss)
|
|
|
Stock
|
|
|
Equity
|
|
|
Income (Loss)
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, at December 31, 2006
|
|
|
60,252
|
|
|
$
|
603
|
|
|
$
|
558,992
|
|
|
$
|
1,906
|
|
|
$
|
1,699
|
|
|
$
|
(68
|
)
|
|
$
|
563,132
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,575
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,575
|
|
|
$
|
6,575
|
|
Foreign exchange translation adjustment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
34,490
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
34,490
|
|
|
|
34,490
|
|
Change in unrealized loss on interest rate swaps, net of tax
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,574
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,574
|
)
|
|
|
(2,574
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
38,491
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock-based compensation expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,979
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,979
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercise of options
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase of common stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(10
|
)
|
|
|
(10
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, at December 31, 2007
|
|
|
60,254
|
|
|
|
603
|
|
|
|
569,972
|
|
|
|
8,481
|
|
|
|
33,615
|
|
|
|
(78
|
)
|
|
|
612,593
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18,801
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18,801
|
|
|
$
|
18,801
|
|
Foreign exchange translation adjustment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(49,078
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(49,078
|
)
|
|
|
(49,078
|
)
|
Change in unrealized loss on interest rate swaps, net of tax
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,427
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,427
|
)
|
|
|
(2,427
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(32,704
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock-based compensation expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,323
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,323
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercise of options
|
|
|
291
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
2,396
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,398
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase of common stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,357
|
)
|
|
|
(2,357
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, at December 31, 2008
|
|
|
60,545
|
|
|
|
605
|
|
|
|
579,691
|
|
|
|
27,282
|
|
|
|
(17,890
|
)
|
|
|
(2,435
|
)
|
|
|
587,253
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19,018
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19,018
|
|
|
$
|
19,018
|
|
Foreign exchange translation adjustment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32,879
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32,879
|
|
|
|
32,879
|
|
Change in unrealized loss on interest rate swaps, net of tax
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,447
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,447
|
|
|
|
1,447
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
53,344
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock-based compensation expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,607
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,607
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercise of options
|
|
|
262
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
1,995
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,998
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase of common stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,215
|
)
|
|
|
(2,215
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, at December 31, 2009
|
|
|
60,807
|
|
|
$
|
608
|
|
|
$
|
587,293
|
|
|
$
|
46,300
|
|
|
$
|
16,436
|
|
|
$
|
(4,650
|
)
|
|
$
|
645,987
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an
integral part of these financial statements.
F-57
SS&C
Technologies Holdings, Inc.
Notes to parent company financial statements
|
|
1.
|
Background and
basis of presentation
|
SS&C Technologies Holdings, Inc. (Holdings) is
the top-level holding company that conducts substantially all of
its business operations through its direct and indirect
subsidiaries. Holdings was incorporated in Delaware on
July 26, 2005 in anticipation of the November 23, 2005
acquisition by its subsidiary, Sunshine Merger Corporation, of
SS&C Technologies, Inc. Holdings had no operations prior to
November 23, 2005.
There are significant restrictions over Holdings ability
to obtain funds from its direct and indirect subsidiaries
through dividends, loans or advances. Accordingly, these
condensed financial statements have been presented on a
parent-only basis. Under a parent-only presentation,
Holdings investments in its consolidated subsidiaries are
presented under the equity method of accounting. These
parent-only financial statements should be read in conjunction
with Holdings consolidated financial statements included
elsewhere in this prospectus.
As described above, the majority of the $646.0 million of
Holdings consolidated subsidiaries net assets are
restricted as to the ability to be transferred to Holdings. In
specific limited circumstances, Holdings can obtain funds from
its direct and indirect subsidiaries. Such amounts are estimated
to be less than 5% of Holdings consolidated net assets and
are limited to the purposes of paying general and administrative
expenses, including compensation to Holdings chief
executive officer and management fees, and treasury stock
purchases.
Since its inception, no cash dividends have been paid to
Holdings by any of its direct or indirect subsidiaries.
Holdings has no direct outstanding debt obligations, but its
direct and indirect subsidiaries do. For a discussion of the
debt obligations of Holdings direct and indirect
subsidiaries, see Note 6 of the notes to the consolidated
financial statements included elsewhere in this prospectus.
|
|
3.
|
Commitments and
contingencies
|
Holdings has no direct commitments or contingencies, but its
direct and indirect subsidiaries do. For a discussion of the
commitments and contingencies of Holdings direct and
indirect subsidiaries, see Note 13 of the notes to the
consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this
prospectus.
F-58