Annual Report Year Ended Dec 31/08
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, DC 20549
Form 6-K
REPORT OF FOREIGN PRIVATE ISSUER
PURSUANT TO RULE 13A-16 OR 15D-16 UNDER
THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the
month of March 2009
Commission File Number: 001-13425
Ritchie Bros. Auctioneers Incorporated
6500 River Road
Richmond, BC, Canada
V6X 4G5
(604) 273 7564
(Address of principal executive offices)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant files or will file annual reports
under cover Form 20-F or Form 40-F
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is submitting the Form 6-K in paper
as permitted by Regulation S-T Rule 101(b)(1): o
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is submitting the Form 6-K in paper
as permitted by Regulation S-T Rule 101(b)(7): o
Indicate by check mark whether by furnishing information contained in this Form,
the registrant is also thereby furnishing the information to the Commission pursuant to
Rule 12g3-2(b) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
If Yes is marked, indicate below the file number assigned to the registrant in
connection with Rule 12g3-2(b): 82-
TABLE OF CONTENTS
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused
this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ritchie Bros. Auctioneers Incorporated
(Registrant)
|
|
Date: March 18, 2009 |
By: |
/s/ Jeremy Black
|
|
|
|
Jeremy Black |
|
|
|
Corporate Secretary |
|
|
AUCTIONS DONE RIGHT. A N N U A L R E PORT 2008 |
2008 2008 was another record-breaking Gross Auction Proceeds in
billions of US dollars year at Ritchie Bros. Auctioneers 3.57
3.5 as well as our 50th anniversary. We conducted 193 unreserved
3.19 industrial auctions and 147 3.0 unreserved agricultural auctions
in 13 countries around the world, 2.72 selling $3.57 billion of used
2.5 and unused equipment for the construction, transportation, 2.09
agricultural and other industries. 2.0 Like every Ritchie Bros. auction,
1.79 these auctions were all unreserved, which means there were no minimum
1.56 1.5 bids or reserve prices. We think our commitment to holding only
unreserved auctions is an important 1.0 factor in the transparency of these
auctions and has played a big part in our success over the past 50 years.
0.5 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07
08 0 contents Buyers in thousands 80.3 84.0 74.0 75.0 Letter to Shareholders
3 Auctions Done Right. 10 62.8 55.9 58.9 About Our Auctions 12 50.0 About Our
Customers 13 Why Buyers Choose Ritchie Bros. 14 25.0 Why Sellers Choose Ritchie
Bros. 16 50 Years of Change 22 Our Web Site 25 0 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93
94 95 96 97 98 99 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 Our Auction Sites 26 The Future
of Ritchie Bros. 28 Consignors in thousands Financial Information 35 37.0 32.1
34.9 30.0 Supplemental Quarterly Data 60 27.9 23.5 24.9 20.0 Selected Financial
and Operating Data 61 Board of Directors 63 10.0 Shareholder Information 64 84
85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 0 In
this annual report, all dollar amounts are stated in United States dollars
unless a different currency is indicated. Gross auction proceeds represent
the total proceeds from all items sold at our auctions. Our definition of
gross auction proceeds may differ from those used by other participants in
our industry. Gross auction proceeds is an important measure we use in comparing
and assessing our operating performance. It is not a measure of our financial
performance, liquidity or revenue and is not presented in our consolidated
financial statements. Auction revenues is the most directly comparable measure
in our Statement of Operations and represents the revenues we earn in the course
of conducting our auctions. Auction revenues are primarily comprised of the
commissions earned on straight commission and gross guarantee contracts, plus
the net profit on the sale of lots purchased and sold by the Company as
principal. Forward-looking statements: The discussion in this Annual Report
includes forward-looking statements, which involve risks and uncertainties
as to possible future outcomes. Readers should refer to the discussion
concerning forward-looking statements and risk factors included in our
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations for the year ended December 31, 2008, which is included in the
Financial Information section of this Annual Report. |
OUR CORE VALUES 1. WE DO WHAT IS RIGHT 2. WE MAINTAIN THE HIGHEST LEVEL
OF BUSINESS INTEGRITY 3. WE BUILD AND MAINTAIN STRONG AND ENDURING CUSTOMER
RELATIONSHIPS 4. WE NEVER LOSE TRACK OF THE BASICS 5. WE FACE OUR ISSUES
IMMEDIATELY AND ARE SOLUTION ORIENTED 6. WE HAVE A HUNGER AND PASSION FOR
THE DEAL 7. WE ARE NIMBLE AND OPPORTUNISTIC 8. WE HAVE FUN |
LETTER TO SHAREHOLDERS
2008 will go down in the record books as a year to remember. In the face of turmoil in
financial markets and the resultant shocks to economies around the world, Ritchie Bros. was able to
deliver growth by continuing to create compelling value for our customers, our employees and our
shareholders.
We generate value for our customers by using unreserved auctions to create a global marketplace
where people can buy and sell equipment in a fair and transparent way. The key to that transparency
is the open and honest nature of our auctions. At its core, our business is about one key thing:
Auctions Done Right. These three simple words capture the essence of what we strive to accomplish
at Ritchie Bros.
In our minds, the words Auctions Done Right have very powerful connotations and are centered on
some very basic principles that are near and dear to us. Every Ritchie Bros. auction is strictly
unreserved, which means there are no minimum bids or reserve prices and the owner is contractually
forbidden from participating in the sale of his assets; every item sells to the highest bidder on
auction day. To us, unreserved means integrity in the auction process from start to finish. At our
unreserved auctions, owners are not permitted to bid on their own items or artificially manipulate
the prices.
When we say Auctions Done Right, we mean auctions that are efficient, customer-oriented and
conducted with integrity, fairness, certainty and transparency. We mean that we offer our customers
a local presence with a global reach; that we treat customers fairly; and that we provide
transparency in the buying and selling process by assembling assets in yards strategically located
around the world and making the items available for interested bidders to inspect, test and compare
for themselves.
These simple principles have endured in our company for decades, and they remain the driving force
behind our innovation and growth. We strive to create enduring value, in an environment where
integrity and fairness guide our way. In these uncertain times, we deliver certainty.
We help our customers manage change by making the sale and purchase of assets convenient, certain
and rewarding.
Convenient? We save our customers time, effort and money by making the process easy,
flexible and comfortable. Our auction yards, complete with environmentally certified refurbishing
facilities, are well located around the globe and all have regularly scheduled auctions. We take
care of all the details, allowing our customers to focus on their business while we deliver
results.
Certainty? Having care, custody and control of the equipment we sell means our sellers do not have
to worry about their assets while we prepare them for sale and our buyers can bid in confidence
knowing that transactions will be completed. We provide our customers with peace of mind and
instill confidence because we back up our promises with results. In addition, every item in all of
our auctions sells to the highest bidder, no matter what, and our financial strength means we are
able to stand behind our word and our obligations.
Rewarding? We deliver global value to consignors in part because of our reputation for integrity
and conducting fair and transparent auctions, which helps to attract bidders. And we provide better
tangible financial results to our consignors with a combination of local, global and online bidding
audiences, giving them the best of all worlds. At the end of the day, we have created an auction
experience for our customers that saves them time and effort and helps them achieve their business
goals.
We invest in relationships with our customers in an effort to transform the way the world buys and
sells commercial and industrial assets.
We believe that our future growth and expansion is directly dependent on our ability to create
compelling value for our customers, and we are always looking for new and better ways to accomplish
that, by creating convenience, providing certainty and delivering rewards when it comes time for
our customers to buy and sell equipment. We strive to do this better than anyone else in the world,
and better than anyone expects, by concentrating on our people, our places and our processes.
Our focus on Auctions Done Right has helped us become the worlds largest industrial auction
company. At the end of 2008, our team was comprised of 1,077 employees working out of more than 110
offices in 25 countries, including 38 auction sites. During 2008, we sold over 253,000 lots for
nearly 37,000 consignors. We held 193 unreserved industrial auctions, attracting over 277,000
bidder registrations. As the charts and graphs in this report show, all these numbers have been
increasing. To us, this is a clear sign that our strategy is working.
Today, as we plan for the future, we see ourselves becoming the worlds largest marketplace for
commercial and industrial assets. That may sound like a lofty goal, but its very much in our
long-term sights. Right now we are looking towards gross auction proceeds
RITCHIE BROS. AUCTIONEERS | 2008 ANNUAL REPORT 3
of $10 billion and beyond, and that motivates us to maintain our focus on our strategy, and not get
distracted by the current economic challenges the world is facing. In fact, these challenges create
opportunities for us, and we are well positioned to capitalize on these opportunities. We continue
to serve just a tiny share of a large and extremely fragmented market, and the factor that has the
biggest impact on our growth is not the world economy; its us, and our ability to design and
execute our strategy.
We have proven our capacity to grow in good times and bad, but we are not resting on our laurels.
We are driven by the desire to continue to grow and innovate with new systems and processes that
meet the needs and demands of our customers and our employees, and we will be rolling out some
exciting things in 2009 to keep us on pace for continued growth.
Many people have asked us about how the world economic turmoil is impacting Ritchie Bros. today
and, perhaps more importantly, how its going to impact us going
forward. We believe our business model is well suited to current economic conditions and that
executing our strategy will continue to be a more significant determinant of our ability to grow
our earnings per share than macro economic factors, just as it has been for the last 50 years. Our
strategy remains consistent, in good times and in bad.
In our world, uncertainty gives equipment owners a reason to buy and sell equipment. And its
important to understand that people have not stopped buying equipment in the face of the current
economic challenges, and nor do we expect them to. There is still an enormous amount of work
underway with infrastructure spending on the rise and residential and other non-residential
projects still being undertaken. Also, when times are tough and cash flow or credit is tight,
traditional buyers of new equipment are more likely to look for good quality, late model used
equipment. All of these behaviors draw people to our fair and transparent auctions, often resulting
in increased demand for the equipment at our auctions.
Our bidders do not appear to be having significant difficulty accessing credit to fund their
auction purchases. And the main participants in the equipment finance world are still offering
credit to buyers of equipment.
Our most recent statistics from the fourth quarter of 2008 showed that our bidder registrations
remained strong. We saw more bidders at our auctions in spite of the economic slowdown. And more
than 80% of those
4 RITCHIE BROS. AUCTIONEERS | 2008 ANNUAL REPORT
bidders were equipment end-users: people with work to do and an immediate need for a particular
type of equipment. That makes a big difference people with jobs to complete buying
income-producing assets at fair market value in an open and transparent auction gives banks and
finance companies confidence when lending money.
Sellers also behave differently in tough economic conditions. Waiting indefinitely for idle
machines to sell is not a luxury most companies can afford, especially now. They need to turn those
surplus assets into cash quickly, efficiently and for fair market value. Our unreserved auctions
are one of the best ways to create liquidity, which is what we do every day. At our auctions, every
item sells on auction day and sellers have cash in hand within 21 days of the auction. Thats
tremendously valuable for all of our customers, not just companies facing liquidity challenges or
finance companies looking to sell repossessed assets. And in these uncertain times, sellers are
reassured knowing that they
are dealing with a well-capitalized organization, which is an added level of comfort they cant get
in many other places. They know they will be paid.
In uncertain times, when work is harder to come by and equipment owners are less optimistic about
the future, they need certainty. They also need to ensure that theyre extracting maximum value
from the sale of their surplus assets. They cant rely just on the local market they need to cast the net wide and reach the most potential buyers from as many regions and
sectors as possible. Because we have over 450,000 customers in more than 200 countries, and a
reputation for conducting fair and transparent auctions, we are able to attract large and diverse
mainly end-user audiences of on-site and online bidders from around the world to each of our
auctions. This is part of why we sell more equipment for more people every year, and more used
equipment than any other organization in the world.
Many people automatically assume that in tough economic times used equipment prices fall
dramatically. That hasnt been our experience equipment prices do not act like stock or commodity
prices. While we saw a general softening of prices in many categories of equipment through 2007 and
2008, with the exception of some of the more specialized equipment we sell, overall returns
remained stronger than many people had expected thanks to the depth and diversity of our bidding
audiences.
RITCHIE BROS. AUCTIONEERS | 2008 ANNUAL REPORT 5
While equipment prices are lower than the historically high prices we experienced in 2006, the
decreases were nowhere near as dramatic as the declines we have witnessed recently in some
financial markets. Additionally, the mix of equipment in our auctions changes constantly so we are
not reliant on the prices in any one category of equipment remaining high or on the performance of
any one industry or geographic region. Our mix and volume of business changes from period to
period, more than compensating for the impact of price changes in particular asset categories.
Its very important to recognize that, yes, times are tough for many of our customers but there
is still a lot of work going on and over $100 billion of used equipment is still trading hands
every year. We are the worlds largest auctioneer of industrial equipment but we handle only a
small fraction of the used equipment thats bought and sold around the world. That means we enjoy
both the benefit of market leadership and the potential for tremendous growth.
Despite all the records and success weve enjoyed in recent years, we still believe that we are
just beginning to scratch the surface. One of the keys to our ability to grow is our people.
Without continuing to attract, train, develop and retain the right people, we will not continue to
grow over the long term. This is an often-misunderstood aspect of our business.
Our business is built on relationships, meaning that our growth is limited by our capacity to meet
and develop relationships with customers. We build these relationships in many ways, including
interactively and online via our industry-leading web site at rbauction.com, over the phone when
customers are dealing directly with our sale sites and our customer service group, and, most
importantly, the old-fashioned way face to face. Our customer relationships are multi-dimensional
and deep, which is why it takes time to develop them.
Our growth strategies are geared towards our dual goals of maintaining and enhancing our corporate
culture and growing our earnings per share at an average annual rate of 15% while generating a
reasonable return on invested capital. We fear that chasing faster growth could dilute our high level of customer service and
make it more challenging for us to maintain and enhance our corporate culture. That is a risk we
are not prepared to take.
Its hard to say what 2009 holds in store for Ritchie Bros. precise visibility into the year
ahead is a challenge for us at the best of times. With the current global economic turmoil and
uncertainty many of our customers are facing, our short-term visibility is even more clouded.
There is one thing we are clear about though we know we are well positioned for ongoing growth
and thats our focus for the future.
Over the past 50 years, we have demonstrated our ability to grow our business at all points in the
economic cycle. What makes this downturn particularly interesting for us is the fact that our
global reach is significantly greater today than it was during previous economic downturns. We are
able to offer a unique and very compelling service to equipment owners who want to access the
global marketplace rather than simply buy and sell in the local market.
Equipment owners look to us to help them transcend local market conditions, especially during
downturns.
2008 was a tremendous year for Ritchie Bros.; however, we could not have accomplished these results
without the hard work and dedication of all the men and women on the Ritchie Bros. team. Our
sincere thanks go to each and every one of them for their commitment to Auctions Done Right. Thanks
to the energy, dedication and passion of our team, we are getting closer every year to our ultimate
goal of becoming the worlds largest marketplace for commercial and industrial assets. We are all
very fortunate to be on a team full of bright, hardworking people with such incredibly positive
attitudes.
And finally, thanks to our shareholders for their confidence and ongoing loyalty to us and
to the ever-increasing number of equipment owners who are choosing to participate in our unreserved
auctions. We truly appreciate your confidence in us.
Auctions Done Right its what motivates us to be our best. Its what generates compelling value
for our customers and returns for our shareholders. Its time to buckle up we have auctions to
build!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Robert W. Murdoch
|
|
Peter J. Blake |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Chairman
|
|
Chief Executive Officer |
6 RITCHIE BROS. AUCTIONEERS | 2008 ANNUAL REPORT
Brisbane, Queensland, Australia Ritchie Bros. Auctioneers 2008 Annual Report 7 |
Kansas City, Missouri, USA 8 Ritchie Bros. Auctioneers 2008 Annual Report |
Ritchie Bros. Auctioneers 2008 Annual Report 9 |
Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
AUCTIONS DONE RIGHT.
10 Ritchie Bros. Auctioneers 2008 Annual Report |
Many people will remember 2008 as a year of turmoil, change and chaos. Not at Ritchie Bros. Well
remember 2008 as the year our company turned 50. A year of setting records and opening auction
sites and helping thousands upon thousands of people around the world buy and sell equipment. A
year of continuing to deliver compelling value for our customers, our employees and our
shareholders. For Ritchie Bros., 2008 was a year of growth and progress.
Our ability to grow in challenging times has a lot to do with the way we conduct our business and
the way we serve our customers, especially during market downturns. At its core, our business is
about Auctions Done Right.
These three simple words summarize everything we stand for at Ritchie Bros. and everything that
makes us stand out. From our very first auction in 1958 to our last auction of 2008 we have made a
conscious effort to do the right thing by all of our customers: first-timers and familiar faces,
buyers and sellers, owner-operators with one machine and multinational companies with millions of
dollars in assets.
Thats why every Ritchie Bros. auction is unreserved. Why owners are not allowed to bid on their
own items. Why we marshall assets at our secure sites under our care, custody and control. Why we
encourage interested buyers to inspect, test and compare equipment before the auction. Why we
search every item for liens before we sell it. And why we publish the selling price of every piece
of equipment on our web site.
Put together, all of these factors spell one thing: transparency. The fact that our auctions are
fair, consistent and transparent is one of the reasons people travel from around the world to
attend our auctions or participate online. Its also why we register record numbers of on-site
and online bidders year after year: more than 277,000 in 2008 alone. And the fact that we register
hundreds, even thousands of bidders from around the world at every auction is one of the reasons we
attract record numbers of equipment sellers year after year: more than 37,000 in 2008. Our
consignors know that a Ritchie Bros. unreserved auction is one of the best ways for them to sell
their surplus assets quickly, efficiently and for global fair market value, especially in slower
economic periods.
Ritchie Bros. auctions are Auctions Done Right for both buyers and sellers of equipment.
50 years of doing the right thing
The concept of Auctions Done Right can be traced back to three Canadian brothers and a small
furniture auction in 1958.
THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN RITCHIE BROS. AND OTHER AUCTION COMPANIES WAS JUST NIGHT AND DAY.
RITCHIE BROS. WAS ABSOLUTELY STRAIGHT;
EVERY AUCTION WAS UNRESERVED, AS ADVERTISED; THEY WERE FIRM, FAIR AND TRANSPARENT.
THAT HASNT CHANGED IN ALL THE YEARS IVE BEEN A CUSTOMER.
TED CARLSON (CANADA)
Dave, Ken and John Ritchie conducted their first auction to repay a $2,000 loan. They didnt have
the cash, so they set up an auction and sold some furniture from their secondhand store. That could
have been the end of the story but it wasnt, because the brothers realized theyd found a unique
way of doing business that benefited and appealed to both buyers and sellers.
Of course, there was nothing new about auctions. But there was something unique about Ritchie Bros.
auctions. The brothers prevented any price manipulation at their sales. They opened their auctions
to the general public and did not set any minimum bids or reserve prices; they forbid owners from
bidding on their own items. Everyone at the auction knew that the bids were
legitimate and the market set the prices not the auctioneer or the seller. These standards still
hold true today.
At Ritchie Bros., we stress the transparency and integrity of our auctions. The main reason is that
many equipment auction companies dont have the best reputation. Price manipulation is common, with
owners bidding in and auctioneers making sure the right customers become buyers.
The Ritchie brothers were determined to set a new standard. By staying true to their values, they
earned the respect of their customers and established their auctions as a fair and legitimate means
of buying and selling equipment. They set Ritchie Bros. on the path to being the worlds largest
industrial auctioneer.
Doing the right thing set us apart in the early days and its what continues to set us apart
today. Were a lot bigger; we have more customers, more locations and more auctions on our annual
calendar. But the essence of Ritchie Bros. Auctions Done Right has not changed over the last 50
years.
RITCHIE BROS. AUCTIONEERS | 2008 ANNUAL REPORT 11
ABOUT OUR AUCTIONS
Ritchie Bros. is the worlds largest auctioneer of industrial equipment and trucks. Headquartered
in Vancouver, B.C., Canada, we have 38 auction sites in North America, Europe, the Middle East and
the Asia-Pacific region with more sites under development. In 2008 we sold $3.57 billion of used
and unused equipment at 340 unreserved industrial and agricultural auctions around the world.
Our industrial auctions range in size from two or three million dollar, single-owner auctions at a
customers yard to multi-day auctions at our permanent auction sites. In February 2008 we conducted
the largest auction in company history, selling $190 million of equipment and trucks over five days
at our Orlando, Florida permanent auction site and attracting more than 6,000 on-site and online
bidders from 71 countries.
No matter how big or small, our auctions have many features in common. They are always unreserved,
with no minimum bids or reserve prices. They are open to the public, with free registration. Most
auctions are broadcast live on our web site, rbauction.com, so our customers can choose to bid in
person, over the internet or by proxy. Whether the auction is conducted at one of our permanent
auction sites or at a temporary yard, we display all of the equipment at the site so that our
customers can inspect, test and compare items before they bid on auction day. And at most auctions,
mobile equipment is driven over a ramp in front of the bidders so they can see it in operation as
they bid.
All of these practices are designed with fairness and transparency in mind. We strive to create a
level playing field for our customers, giving every potential buyer the opportunity to find,
inspect and buy the equipment they need at fair market prices.
Although the size of our auctions varies, the average Ritchie Bros. auction continues to grow. In
2008, an average industrial auction featured 1,301 lots from 189 consignors, generating $17.7
million in gross auction proceeds and attracting 1,431 on-site and online bidders from around the
world.
An Average Ritchie Bros.
Industrial Auction in 2008
|
|
|
$17.7
|
|
million in gross auction proceeds |
1,301
|
|
lots |
189
|
|
consignors |
1,431
|
|
bidders (total) |
410
|
|
online bidders |
$10.6
|
|
million of equipment sold to out-of-region bidders (60%) |
82
|
% |
end-user purchases |
YOU GO TO OTHER AUCTIONS AND THERE ARE
MAYBE ONE HUNDRED PEOPLE. YOU GO TO A RITCHIE BROS. AUCTION AND
THERE ARE TWO THOUSAND.
WHAT DOES THAT TELL YOU?
JOHN SPADARO (AUSTRALIA)
12 RITCHIE BROS. AUCTIONEERS | 2008 ANNUAL REPORT
ABOUT OUR CUSTOMERS
Every year, we help more people in more places around the world buy and sell equipment. Our
customers are a diverse bunch. They come from 200 countries. Some are buyers, some are sellers; an
increasing number are both. Many people have been attending our auctions for years; others recently
bid for the first time. Some own multi-million dollar fleets of equipment; others operate one or
two machines.
Our customers include end-users of equipment and dealers; finance companies and banks; rental
companies and manufacturers. They work in the construction, transportation, agricultural, material
handling, mining, forestry, petroleum, marine and other industries.
We sometimes conduct complete dispersals for people who are retiring or companies that are shutting
down, but most of our customers are buying and selling equipment as part of a regular fleet
turnover program or at the start or finish of projects.
In spite of these differences, our customers have many similarities. They appreciate honesty,
integrity and transparency. They want to be treated right. They want to know that they are paying a
fair price when they buy and getting a fair return when they sell. They want value and they want
their business to be valued. They want certainty in these uncertain times. They want Auctions Done
Right.
Thats why an increasing number of people turn to Ritchie Bros. auctions every year for their
equipment buying and selling needs.
Our Customers
2008 Statistics
|
|
|
277,000
|
|
bidder registrations |
84,000
|
|
buyers (total) |
16,000
|
|
buyers (online) |
37,000
|
|
consignors |
450,000
|
|
customers |
|
|
in 200 countries |
99,000
|
|
qualified
online bidders
from 181 countries |
RITCHIE
BROS. AUCTIONEERS | 2008 ANNUAL REPORT 13
WHY BUYERS CHOOSE RITCHIE BROS.
In 2008, we had a record 277,000 bidder registrations at our industrial auctions. Whether they are bidding on-site or online, our customers choose Ritchie Bros. for their
equipment buying needs for a number of reasons:
èFair, transparent auction processes
Every Ritchie Bros. auction is unreserved, with no minimum bids or reserve prices. We also forbid
owners from bidding on their own items. Our customers can be confident that the bidders not the
sellers or the auctioneer set the prices at our auctions, so they always pay fair market value.
And they know that every item will be sold on auction day, regardless of price.
è Comprehensive selection of equipment
Over 1,300 items are sold at an average Ritchie Bros. industrial auction everything from skid
steer loaders and forklifts to motor graders and truck tractors. In 2008, we sold a total of
253,000 lots, making our auctions one
of the best sources for used equipment in the world. Our customers can usually find what theyre
looking for in our auctions, whether its down the road or on the other side of the world.
è Convenient locations around the world
Whether were conducting an auction at one of our 38 auction sites worldwide or at a temporary
location, we gather the equipment at the site so our customers can inspect and compare items from
many different sellers in one convenient location. Our auction sites are strategically located
close to major transportation routes and services, making it more convenient and cost-effective for
out-of-region bidders to participate on auction day.
è The ability to inspect, test and compare items
We marshal most of the equipment we sell at our secure auction sites so our customers can inspect,
test and compare items before they bid on auction day. Our customers dont have to rely on a
third-party inspection report: they can verify the condition and assess the value of a machine for themselves. They also know exactly
where their purchases are located in Ritchie Bros. care.
è Lien-free equipment
Our search department works to identify and release any liens and encumbrances before auction day,
so our customers can be confident that the equipment they are buying comes with clear title. If we
cant deliver clear title, we offer a full refund of the purchase price.
è No hidden fees or premiums
Our auctions are open to the public; registration to bid is free. Unlike some auction companies, we
do not charge any fees to bid on or buy equipment, except for a two percent fee on internet
purchases and an administrative fee charged on the purchase of low value lots. And we never place
reserve prices on any item we sell. Our customers can be confident that the price they bid is the
price they pay.
è Convenient bidding options
Our customers have three convenient bidding options at most Ritchie Bros. auctions: in person,
online or by proxy. Most of our customers still prefer to bid in person but if they cant make it
to the auction site, they appreciate having the ability to bid online in real time at our auctions
around the world. Knowing that every bid is legitimate and that they are bidding against live
on-site bidders who can see the equipment moving across the ramp gives them added confidence when
they are bidding online.
è Value-added services
We continue to enhance our customers buying experience by inviting third-party vendors to our
auctions (such as finance companies, transportation companies, customs brokers and caterers) and
partnering with companies that offer value-added services (such as Like-Kind Exchange services,
credit card payments and shipping quotes).
14 RITCHIE BROS. AUCTIONEERS | 2008 ANNUAL REPORT
I KNOW I AM NOT BIDDING AGAINST THE OWNER OF THE MACHINE; ITS A LEVEL PLAYING
FIELD... THE PRICES AT RITCHIE BROS. AUCTIONS ARE FAIR YOU PAY
WHAT THE MACHINE IS WORTH, THE MARKET PRICE. NAVNEET MATHUR (INDIA)
Ritchie Bros. Auctioneers 2008 Annual Report 15 |
Los Angeles, California, USA WHY SELLERS CHOOSE RITCHIE BROS. 16 Ritchie Bros. Auctioneers 2008 Annual Report |
In 2008, we handled a record 37,000 consignments at our industrial auctions representing 253,000
lots for equipment sellers around the world. Whether they are selling one machine or their entire
fleet, our customers rely on us to turn their assets into cash quickly, efficiently and for
global fair market value. They choose Ritchie Bros. over other methods of selling because we offer:
è Fair, transparent auction processes
Our commitment to unreserved auctions with no bid-ins or buy-backs clearly benefits bidders. But
our sellers value the fairness and transparency of our auctions just as much. For a start, many of
them are also buyers. More importantly, they know that its the transparency of our auctions that
helps draw hundreds, even thousands of people from around the world to bid helping sellers
achieve the best possible returns on auction day.
è Flexible contract options
We offer different contract options to meet our customers sale objectives and risk tolerance,
including straight commission, guarantee and outright purchase options.
è Unparalleled marketing
We employ a comprehensive global marketing campaign for each and every industrial auction using our
high-traffic web site, rbauction.com; full-color auction brochures; print and online advertising;
and often, media relations campaigns. Our consignors can be confident that they are reaching the
maximum number of potential buyers from around the world when they sell through Ritchie Bros.
è Global fair market value
An average Ritchie Bros. industrial auction attracts more than 1,400 on-site and online bidders
from around the world. Reaching beyond the local market for buyers enables our consignors to sell
their equipment for its global market value, regardless of local market conditions. Our auctions
transcend local and regional market conditions to achieve the highest possible return.
è Access to end-users
We attract large numbers of end-users to our auctions because they know they can buy a piece of
equipment today and put it to work almost instantly. End-users represented roughly 80 percent of
the purchases at our auctions in 2008, which helps drive higher prices. Unlike wholesale buyers or
resellers, end-users are rarely speculative buyers; they tend to bid when they need a machine for a
specific project, which motivates them to outbid their competitors.
WE COULD SEE THE MARKET SOFTENING IN SOME PARTS OF THE WORLD BUT NOT IN OTHERS, AND WE REALIZED THAT
REACHING THOSE AREAS OF STRENGTH
WOULD HELP BRING BETTER PRICES... SELLING THROUGH RITCHIE BROS.
IS THE BEST WAY TO MITIGATE RISK IN A SOFT MARKET.
HUGH EDELEANU (U.K.)
è Exposure to online and on-site bidders
Despite the convenience of online bidding, most Ritchie Bros. customers still prefer to bid in
person at our auction sites. They like kicking the tires on the equipment theyre interested in
and they like to see it running over the ramp as they bid. When youre selling a machine thats
worth tens or hundreds of thousands of dollars, its important to reach every potential buyer not
just the ones who bid online.
è On-site refurbishing
Many of our consignors get their equipment auction ready by having their equipment painted or
refurbished at the convenient, cost-competitive refurbishing facilities at our permanent auction
sites. Buyers will often pay a premium for a machine that is ready to be put straight to work. They
can finance the full price of a painted machine but will not be able to finance a paint job done
after the auction.
è Selling experience and expertise
Selling equipment takes time, expertise and resources. We take care of every aspect of the sale of
our customers equipment from advertising to meeting potential buyers to collecting proceeds so
they can focus on what they do best: running their business.
è Almost instant liquidity
At Ritchie Bros. unreserved auctions, every single item is sold on auction day. Within three weeks
our consignors receive the net proceeds of the sale. Unlike most other sales channels, our
unreserved auctions provide almost instant liquidity for equipment sellers.
è Peace of mind
Ritchie Bros. is listed on the New York and Toronto stock exchanges. We have a solid balance sheet
and a history of over 50 years in the auction business. Our customers feel confident placing their
equipment in our hands because we have the experience, integrity and financial ability to deliver
on our commitments.
The global marketplace:
More important than ever
In 2008, more than 60 percent of the gross auction proceeds at our auctions came from buyers living
outside the region of the auction.
Because our auctions are unreserved and owners are forbidden from bidding on their equipment, every
item sells for its true fair market value on auction day. And because we attract bidders from all
over the world, both in person and online, every item sells for its global market value -
regardless of the local market conditions. Thats why an increasing number of equipment owners
choose Ritchie Bros. to help them get the best return on their assets each year.
RITCHIE BROS. AUCTIONEERS | 2008 ANNUAL REPORT 17
Orlando, Florida, USA
WITH A TRULY UNRESERVED AUCTION
YOU KNOW THAT EVERY BID
IS LEGITIMATE.
PEOPLE FEEL COMFORTABLE BIDDING,
AND THAT BRINGS HIGHER PRICES FOR THE EQUIPMENT.
FRANK FOWLER (USA)
18 Ritchie Bros. Auctioneers 2008 Annual Report |
WHY UNRESERVED?
Every Ritchie Bros. auction is unreserved. That means there is no minimum bid or reserve price on
any item we sell. We also forbid owners and their agents, by contract, from bidding on the items
they are selling. As a result, every item is sold to the highest bidder on auction day, regardless
of price. In our view, the only truly fair and transparent auctions are unreserved auctions.
At Ritchie Bros. unreserved auctions, prices are set by the bidders not by the sellers or the
auctioneer. Bidders come to our auctions in the thousands because they know that there are no
hidden reserves; they know that every item will be sold to a new owner on auction day; and they
know that they will always pay fair market value. And because those bidders come from all over the
world, in person and online, our consignors know that their equipment will be sold for its true
global fair market value. |
Moerdijk, The Netherlands |
OUR FIRST 50 YEARS
RITCHIE BROS.: FROM 1958 TO 2008
1958 First auction, in Kelowna, British Columbia, Canada
1963 First industrial auction, in Radium, British Columbia, Canada
1970 U.S. expansion: first auction outside Canada, in Oregon, U.S.A
1976 First permanent auction site, in Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
1985 $1 billion in lifetime auction proceeds
1987 First auctions outside North America, in the U.K. and the Netherlands
1990 First auction in Australia 1991 1,000th auction 1994 First auction in Asia 1995 First auction
in Mexico 1996 Launch of rbauction.com 1997 First auction in the Middle East
1998 Listed on the New York Stock Exchange First $1 billion year
2000 2,000th auction
2002 Online bidding service introduced 2003 First auction in Africa 2004 Listed on Toronto Stock
Exchange 2005 First $2 billion year 2006 3000th auction 2007 First $3 billion year
2008 50th anniversary
First auction in Eastern Europe First $1 billion quarter
2008:
A year of records, milestones, developing people, expanding places and improving processes
Records
t___$3.57 billion
t___proceeds: $700 million
t_
t___-$190 million (Orlando, FL)
t___-and Mexico auctions in company history
t___set at 12 auction sites:
Orlando, Florida ($190 million)
Atlanta, Georgia ($60 million)
Fort Worth, Texas ($57 million)
Las Vegas, Nevada ($54 million)
Brisbane, Australia
($ 52 million/AU$55 million)
North East, Maryland ($42 million)
Moncofa, Spain ($38 million/ 30 million)
Others with gross auction proceeds less than $20 million.
Caorso, Italy
Albuquerque, New Mexico
Melbourne, Australia
Toluca, Mexico
Paris, France
Milestones
t___UI_BOOJWFSTBSZ
t_
t___over the internet
t___EEFE_UP_4_1_549___$
Geographic Expansion
t_
t___sites in Kansas City, Missouri and Paris, France; both replaced regional auction units
t___in Las Vegas, Nevada
t___to larger sites: from Livorno, Italy to Caorso, Italy; from Sagunto, Spain to nearby Moncofa;
and from Melbourne, Australia to nearby Geelong
t___$ new or replacement permanent auction sites in Houston, Texas; Minneapolis, Minnesota; Grande
Prairie, Alberta; London, Ontario; and Mexico City, Mexico
t___-permanent auction site in Vancouver, BC and a new permanent auction site in Tokyo, Japan
t___QQSPYJNBUFMZ___BDSFT_PG_MBOE___purchased to expand permanent auction site in Orlando, Florida
Process improvements
t___&MFDUSPOJD_VDUJPO_
t___7JSUVBM_3BNQ t___t___$SFEJU_DBSE_TFSWJDFT t_ |
Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada
50 YEARS OF CHANGE
AND STAYING THE SAME |
In 2008, Ritchie Bros. Auctioneers celebrated its 50th anniversary. Much has changed over the past
50 years: we are now the worlds largest auctioneer of industrial equipment, with a global network
of world-class auction facilities and an annual calendar of hundreds of auctions that attract
on-site and online bidders from across the globe. But a lot has also stayed the same. Our company
was founded on two basic principles: every auction should be unreserved and every customer should
be treated fairly and with respect. We hold true to those principles to this day and believe that
commitment has played a large part in our success.
Our customers and employees shared in many 50th anniversary celebrations this year. Among the
highlights:
50 Stories for 50 Years
We collected 50 stories from a wide range of customers in 2008, from the seasoned online bidder in
New York to the first-time seller in Canada to the well-traveled buyer from India, and posted them
on our web site. They told us what brought them to Ritchie Bros. in the first place and what
keeps them coming back. The same words came up repeatedly: integrity, honesty, fairness,
transparency. Auctions Done Right.
RitchieWiki.com
In September 2008 we launched RitchieWiki to share our wealth of equipment knowledge with our
customers and other industry participants. RitchieWiki is a collaborative web site containing
hundreds of articles about equipment that anyone can read, add to or edit. The wiki is supported by
a free public database with specifications for more than 11,000 different pieces of equipment
making it the worlds largest free equipment specifications database. And were still adding to it.
RITCHIE BROS. AUCTIONEERS | 2008 ANNUAL REPORT 23
OUR WEB SITE
Our web site, rbauction.com, has become an important point of contact with our customers. Many of our regular customers make a point of visiting the site daily. Thats why we strive to
make the site as accessible, informative and transparent as possible.
Our customers visit rbauction.com to:
è Check the auction calendar
We listed 340 auctions around the world on our web site in 2008
è Search for equipment
We post photos and details, including serial numbers, on our web site for every item we sell so our
customers can make accurate and informed buying decisions
è Look up past auction results
We publish the results for every item sold over the previous 24 months within 48 hours of the
auction, giving our customers free access to worldwide equipment values and adding to the
transparency of our auctions
è Place bids
If they cant make it to the auction site on auction day, our customers can visit rbauction.com to
place real-time or proxy bids in auctions around the world
è Find their local Ritchie Bros. representative or office
We have offices and auction sites in more than 25 countries to serve our global customer base
Were looking forward to introducing our enhanced web site and online bidding service to our
customers in 2009.
In 2008,
rbauction.com
Received:
|
|
|
4.6
|
|
million unique visitors who conducted |
|
|
|
22.9
|
|
million equipment searches and looked up |
|
|
|
1.9
|
|
million past auction results. |
THERE ARE COMPETING AUCTION COMPANIES,
SOME ONLINE, SOME CONVENTIONAL, BUT
NOBODY COMBINES THE INTERNET WITH THE PROVEN ON-SITE AUCTION METHOD AS WELL
AS RITCHIE BROS.
TOM STEVENSON (CANADA)
Bidding online at rbauction.com
We introduced our innovative real-time internet bidding service in 2002. Today, most Ritchie Bros.
auctions are broadcast live on our web site, giving our customers unprecedented access to the
global equipment marketplace. Our online bidding service was designed to mirror the experience of
bidding on-site as closely as possible: internet bidders can hear the auctioneer, see pictures and
details of the items being sold, make selections from choice groups, keep track of bids coming from
on-site and online bidders, and place bids all in real time. Our internet bidding service
maintains the transparency of our live auctions and enables our online and on-site bidders to compete on a level
playing field.
Consider these numbers:
|
|
|
-
|
|
99,000 registered online bidders from 181 countries |
|
|
|
-
|
|
$700 million of equipment sold to online bidders in 2008 |
|
|
|
-
|
|
Almost $2.5 billion of equipment sold to online bidders since 2002 |
|
|
|
-
|
|
In 2008, 29 percent of our bidders participated online |
Our buyers arent the only ones who benefit from our online bidding service: the participation of
on-site and online bidders from around the world enables our consignors to reach the greatest and
most diverse audience of potential buyers, ensuring maximum possible returns on the sale of their
equipment. Our ability to create this international marketplace and help our customers sell their
equipment for its global market value is even more important now, with so many regions and markets
facing challenging economic times. In these uncertain times, combining on-site and online bidders
means our auctions offer what few others channels can the best of both worlds.
RITCHIE BROS. AUCTIONEERS | 2008 ANNUAL REPORT 25
OUR AUCTION SITES
In 2008, over 70 percent of our customers chose to bid in person at our unreserved auctions. Many
customers will travel hundreds, even thousands of miles to attend our auctions, despite the ease
and convenience of our online bidding service. They like being able to inspect, test and compare
equipment items to assess their value and condition before the auction; they like seeing the
machines in operation as they bid; and they like meeting with other people in their industry.
Our secure auction sites enable us to gather equipment from multiple sellers in one place so our
customers can compare different items and
make an informed decision before they bid. Our sites also enable us to have full care, custody and
control of the equipment we sell from the time it enters our yard to the time we release it to the
new owner, which gives our customers a greater level of comfort when they bid on auction day.
We believe our auction sites contribute to the transparency of our auction processes and offer one
of our most significant competitive advantages, which is why we are continuing to invest in the
expansion and improvement of our global network. We currently have
38 auction sites in North America, Europe, the Middle East and Australia, including 31 permanent
auction sites.
When assessing the potential for a new auction site we look at many factors, including our auction
history and the size and growth of our customer base in that region; local regulations and
conditions that impact buying, selling and moving equipment; and the availability and suitability
of land near major transportation routes, airports, hotels and other services.
The evolution of an auction site
The process of developing a Ritchie Bros. auction site begins with our first foray into a new
territory and ends with a Grand Opening auction at a new permanent auction site. We dont develop
sites one at a time; rather, we are always in the process of developing our business in new regions
around the world. This is the typical process and some of the progress we made in 2008.
1. Get to know customers from
a new region when they attend our auctions in other regions
In 2008 we welcomed the first bidders from Serbia, among other countries, to our auctions.
2. Send a Territory Manager
into that region to assess the market opportunity and establish a sales office
In 2008 we opened a new sales office in Hong Kong |
THERES STILL A DESIRE TO KICK THE TIRES.
PEOPLE LIKE TO LOOK AT WHAT THEYRE BUYING
AND CHECK THE MECHANICAL CONDITION OF A MACHINE FOR THEMSELVES.
FRANK RIZZARDO (CANADA)
Europe USA
Moerdijk, The Netherlands 1 Olympia, WA 18
Paris, France 2 Sacramento, CA 19
Caorso, Italy 3 Los Angeles, CA 20
Moncofa, Spain 4 Las Vegas, NV 21
Phoenix, AZ 22
Middle East
Albuquerque, NM 23
Dubai, UAE 5
Denver, CO 24
Australia Fort Worth, TX 25
Brisbane, QLD 6 Houston, TX 26
Geelong, VIC 7 Kansas City, MO 27
Buxton, ND 28
Canada Minneapolis, MN 29
Vancouver, BC 8
Chicago, IL 30
Prince George, BC 9
Nashville, TN 31
Grande Prairie, AB 10
Atlanta, GA 32
Edmonton, AB 11
Columbus, OH 33
Saskatoon, SK 12
Statesville, NC 34
Regina, SK 13
Orlando, FL 35
London, ON 14
North East, MD 36
Toronto, ON 15
Hartford, CT 37
Montréal, QC 16
Truro, NS 17 Mexico
Mexico City 38
3. Help new consignors in that 4. Conduct an auction at a 5. After several successful 6. When the growth in gross
region sell equipment at our temporary location in the auctions, open a regional auction proceeds warrants the
auctions in other regions and new region auction unit on leased land investment, purchase land
help bidders participate in with limited auction and and establish a full-service
In 2008 we conducted our
other auctions administrative facilities permanent auction site
first ever auction in Poland
In 2008 we sold equipment on In 2008 we established In 2008 we opened new
behalf of our first consignors a regional unit permanent auction sites
from Israel, Hungary and other in Las Vegas, NV, USA in Kansas City, Missouri
countries and Paris, France |
Paris, France
THE FUTURE OF RITCHIE BROS. |
The mission of Ritchie Bros. is simple: to be the worlds largest marketplace for commercial and
industrial assets. We believe this mission is both realistic and achievable, as long as we stay true to our founding
principles: conducting strictly unreserved auctions and treating every customer fairly and with
respect. As we pursue this long-term mission we intend to remain focused on two core goals: to
maintain and enhance our corporate culture and to grow our earnings per share at an average of 15%
per year while maintaining a reasonable return on invested capital.
Our corporate culture is captured in our core values. While our stated mission is growth, we will
not pursue growth opportunities that offer short-term rewards but run counter to our core values.
We believe that compromising our corporate culture would in fact inhibit our long-term growth
potential and be a disservice to our customers, employees and shareholders.
Opportunities for growth
The worldwide market for used equipment is massive and highly fragmented. Analysts estimate that
over $100 billion of used equipment is bought and sold around the world each year. Our auctions
represent a small segment of that market; most people still sell their surplus equipment privately,
by placing ads in magazines or on the internet, or through dealers or brokers. We believe our
unreserved auctions offer significant benefits over these sales channels and the annual growth in
our gross auction proceeds suggests that our customers agree.
For years we have enjoyed the position of being the worlds largest auctioneer of industrial
equipment. We also sell more used equipment than any other organization (auctioneers and
non-auctioneers) in the world. Yet we sold only $3.57 billion of equipment at our auctions in 2008.
In other words, we are the dominant player in the highly fragmented used equipment industry, with a
very small share of a very large market giving us significant potential for long-term growth.
We will continue to focus on increasing our market share in our core markets of construction,
transportation and agricultural equipment, as well as complementary markets such as mining,
material handling, forestry and petroleum assets. We also intend to penetrate deeper in our
existing regions and expand our presence in new geographic markets.
Our growth strategy
To achieve our growth objectives we are investing simultaneously on three fronts: our people,
places and processes. We are pleased with the progress we made in all three areas in 2008.
1. Our people
At its heart, our business is about relationships. We dont sell a product, we sell a service and
we need the right people interacting with our customers, explaining the value that we provide and
reflecting the integrity of our auction processes. Recruiting, training and retaining the right
people especially sales staff is one of our key priorities. We look for bright, hardworking
people with positive attitudes to join our team. We give them the tools and training they need to
be effective
and productive, and offer them competitive compensation and opportunities for growth within our
organization.
We also remain focused on active succession planning and leadership development, with an emphasis
on developing our employees from within. We are committed to making Ritchie Bros. the kind of
company where motivated individuals can build a rewarding career.
While other companies were laying off employees in 2008, we remained in hiring mode. At the close
of 2008 we had 1,077 full-time employees around the world, including 265 sales representatives and
29 Trainee Territory Managers, versus 943, 265 and 11 at the end of 2007. We have been working hard
to find and train new sales representatives,
Recipients of the 2007
Gold level Dave Ritchie
Excellence Awards for sales with members of the Management
Advisory Committee. |
RITCHIE BROS. AUCTIONEERS | 2008 ANNUAL REPORT 29
and are pleased to have so many Trainee TMs on staff. These people represent the future of our
sales force and future sales. Our sales force productivity (gross auction proceeds divided by
number of revenue producers) increased to $13.5 million per revenue producer for 2008 compared to
$12.5 million in 2007. This is a key metric in our business and the improved performance
demonstrates the results of our people efforts.
2. Our places
We intend to increase our share of existing markets while simultaneously developing new markets and
expanding our international network of auction sites. When we talk about markets, we are referring
to both market sectors and geographic areas.
Although we expect that most of our short-term growth will come from regions where we are already
well established, such as the United States and Western Europe, we believe that emerging markets in
developing countries offer significant potential for long-term growth. That is why we are
establishing offices and developing relationships with new customers in countries like China, India
and Poland.
We plan to expand our international network of auction sites, adding at least two new sites every
year, with a short-term focus on the United States and Western Europe. We will also continue
conducting off-site auctions to expand our presence in new regions.
At the end of 2008 we had more than 110 offices in more than 25 countries, including 38 auction
sites in North America, Europe, the Middle East and Australia. We also have new permanent auction
sites currently under development in other locations such as Japan, Mexico and Australia.
3. Our processes
We are committed to making our business more consistent, efficient and scalable by implementing new
and improved processes and systems. Technology will continue to play a large role in our business,
enabling us to improve the quality of our auctions and deliver added value to our buyers and
sellers. We believe that the continuous improvement mindset weve developed over the past few years
will help us improve our margins over the long term.
Among the process improvements we introduced or expanded in 2008:
è Electronic Auction Clerking This software relays auction information such as proxy bids, buyer
numbers and sold prices almost instantly between the auctioneer, clerk and administrative offices.
Proxy bids can now be placed minutes before an item is sold and buyers can pay almost immediately.
The system has resulted in significant efficiency gains at our auctions.
è The Virtual Ramp Equipment photos are projected onto a large screen so bidders can see each item
as they bid. First used at Ritchie Bros. auctions for assets located off-site, such as boats or
real estate, the Virtual Ramp is now being used to increase speed,
efficiency and bidder comfort when selling stationary equipment items. Deployed outside North
America for the first time in 2008, it is now in use at most Ritchie Bros. auction sites.
è Automated electronic signboards Linked to our online bidding service, the signboards display the
current ask prices to the bidders at the auction site: a valuable service for our non-English
speaking customers.
è Credit card services On-site and online bidders at Ritchie Bros. auctions in the United States,
Canada, Australia, the Middle East and most countries in Europe can pay by credit card.
è Online shipping services We entered into a partnership with uShip to provide real-time shipping
estimates and competitive shipping quotes through our web site, rbauction.com, for our auctions in
the United States and Canada.
We believe the three aspects of our growth strategy complement each other: our people help us
achieve our goals and grow our gross auction proceeds, our places give us the capacity to handle
future growth, and our processes enable us to
become more efficient and effective as we expand around the world. Success comes from making
progress on all three fronts, and not by focusing on any one in isolation.
Managing Deal Risk
Most of our business is conducted on a straight commission basis and is therefore relatively risk
free. In 2008, approximately 75 percent of our business was straight commission, which is in line
with our typical business mix in recent years. The other 25 percent of our business involved a
guarantee of minimum sale proceeds or an outright purchase of a customers assets.
The economic turmoil of the latter half of 2008 generated increased demand for underwritten
contracts from customers concerned about the value of their equipment in the face of an economic
downturn. Were one of the few companies in our industry still in a position to offer guarantee
contracts; on the other hand, we are more conservative during periods of market volatility such as
weve seen recently. As a result, the proportion of our business that was underwritten did not
shift significantly in late 2008.
We mitigate risk when entering into underwritten contracts by building a risk premium into our
commission rate and by
following a rigorous inspection and appraisal process that draws on our extensive field experience
and unparalleled database of equipment values. We sell more used equipment than any other company
in the world, giving us a unique window into the global equipment marketplace and, in particular,
the pipeline of equipment coming to market. We use this information in an effort to stay ahead of
changing market conditions and anticipate any shifts in supply and demand, then adjust our
appraisals accordingly.
Equipment values are more stable than stock and commodity prices and tend not to fluctuate
dramatically over short periods of time, so the limited timeframe that our guarantee and purchase
contracts are outstanding also mitigates our risk on underwritten business. The time from signing a
contract to selling on auction day is typically between 30 and 45 days, which enables us to give
more confident assessments of potential auction day prices.
Environmental Principles
We have always taken pride in our environmental practices. Whether it be the fact that our business
model provides a channel for used equipment to be re-used by new owners, or that all our state-of-
the-art refurbishment facilities meet the highest level of environmental standards. In 2008 we
articulated a set of environmental principles designed to guide our behavior.
Ritchie Bros. is committed to contributing to the protection of the natural environment by
preventing and reducing adverse impacts of our operations. Our objective is to be more than
compliant we want to make a positive contribution and be true to our core value: We do what is
right.
As part of this commitment, we aim to:
1) |
|
empower our employees to identify and address environmental issues; |
|
2) |
|
consider environmental impacts as part of all business decisions; |
|
3) |
|
conduct business in
compliance with applicable regulations and legislation, and where appropriate, adopt the most
stringent as our global benchmark; |
|
4) |
|
use resources wisely and efficiently to minimize our
environmental impact; |
|
5) |
|
communicate transparently with our stakeholders about environmental
matters; |
|
6) |
|
conduct ongoing assessments to ensure compliance and good stewardship; |
|
7) |
|
hold
management accountable for providing leadership on environmental matters, achieving targets, and
providing education to employees. |
Our objective is to stimulate local decision-making in line with these environmental principles,
with executive leadership as necessary.
30 RITCHIE BROS. AUCTIONEERS | 2008 ANNUAL REPORT
THE PEOPLE AT RITCHIE BROS. KNOW WHAT THEYRE DOING.
THEY HAVE THE SYSTEMS IN PLACE
TO CONDUCT AN AUCTION, IN ANY LOCATION, AND THAT MADE THE WHOLE
EXPERIENCE STRAIGHTFORWARD, SIMPLE AND PAINLESS.
RAY SCOTT (AUSTRALIA) |
|
|
|
Step One Getting to know the customer
|
|
|
|
|
|
The process of selling a piece of equipment usually begins when one of our Territory Managers meets with
the
owner to find out how we can best meet that owners particular needs. Ours is a relationship business, and
to deliver value to our customers we need to take time to get to know them well. |
|
|
|
Step Two Assessing the value of the customers equipment
|
|
|
|
|
|
We assess the value of a customers equipment, often conducting a professional appraisal drawing on the
expertise of our team of experienced appraisers and our extensive knowledge of the global used equipment
market. |
|
|
|
Step Three Drafting the auction contract
|
|
|
|
|
|
We offer our consignors a range of contract options, including straight commission, guarantee and outright
purchase. Straight commission contracts represent about 75 percent of our business. We strive to offer
flexible
contract options for our customers while accepting appropriate levels of risk. |
|
|
|
Step Four Getting the equipment ready for the auction
|
|
|
|
|
|
We will recommend and coordinate any cleaning, painting, repairs or refurbishing thats needed to help our
consignors achieve maximum value for their equipment on auction day. Most of our permanent auction sites
have
environmentally certified refurbishing facilities so this work can be done on-site. |
|
|
|
Step Five Marketing the equipment to the world
|
|
|
|
|
|
We undertake comprehensive marketing campaigns to ensure the participation of the widest possible audience
of bidders in each of our auctions. We post equipment details and photos on our high-traffic web site,
rbauction.com,
which receives tens of thousands of unique visitors daily. For each auction, we mail tens of thousands of
full-color
brochures to a targeted group of customers from our database of 450,000 people in 200 countries. We
advertise
in trade magazines, newspapers and on radio, and create added awareness of our auctions through strategic
media relations campaigns. |
|
|
|
Step Six Searching the equipment for liens
|
|
|
|
|
|
Our search department works to identify and resolve any title issues before the auction. If we cant
deliver clear
and marketable title to our buyers, we will offer them a full refund. Our customers bid knowing that they
can take
possession of their auction purchases as soon as theyve paid and put their new equipment straight to
work. |
|
|
|
Step Seven Setting up the auction yard
|
|
|
|
|
|
We display and sell most of the equipment we sell right on site at the auction location. Knowing that we
have full
care, custody and control of all equipment we sell, from the time it arrives at our auction site until
the time the
new buyers take possession, gives both our sellers and our buyers tremendous comfort. Our sellers know the
equipment is safe and available for inspection. We arrange the equipment in logical groupings at the site
so our
customers can easily inspect, test and compare different items before they bid on auction day. We also
make any
additional documentation, including work and repair history, available to potential buyers so they can
assess
the value of the equipment for themselves and be prepared to bid on auction day. And our knowledgeable
staff
is always on hand to answer any questions. And at the end of the day, buyers dont have to worry about
trying
to locate or get access to their purchases. |
|
|
|
Step Eight Conducting the auction
|
|
|
|
|
|
Months of preparation go into an auction, but on auction day our team of auctioneers, bid catchers,
clerks, yard
crew, internet services staff and customer service representatives work together to ensure the auction
progresses
smoothly and efficiently. We do everything possible to make our bidders feel comfortable and confident on
auction day. At most sites, we drive mobile equipment over a ramp in front of the bidders so they can see
the
machines in operation as they bid. In some locations we sell stationary items indoors using our
proprietary virtual
ramp technology. We sell every item unreserved and prevent owners from bidding in; our customers know that
every item will be sold to a new owner on auction day. And we allow third party finance companies,
transportation
companies, customs brokers, caterers and other service providers to offer their services to our customers
at the
auction site. |
|
|
|
Step Nine Taking care of business
|
|
|
|
Once the auction is over, we collect the proceeds from the buyers, including applicable sales taxes
(which we remit
to the appropriate authorities); only then do we release the equipment to the new owner. Within three
weeks of
the auction we deliver the net proceeds of the sale to our consignors, along with a detailed settlement
statement
making our unreserved auctions one of the fastest, most efficient ways to create liquidity. |
32 RITCHIE BROS. AUCTIONEERS | 2008 ANNUAL REPORT
OUR AUCTION PROCESS
THE RITCHIE BROS. AUCTION PROCESS: FROM SURPLUS TO SOLD Our auction process is well defined,
consistent and transparent. Whether our customers are consigning one piece of equipment or selling
an entire fleet, they can be confident that we will take care of their needs and follow through on
our commitments. At its heart, its about Auctions Done Right. |
Kansas City, Missouri, USA |
FINANCIAL INFORMATION
|
|
|
|
|
PAGE |
Managements Discussion and Analysis |
|
35 |
Auditors Reports |
|
48 |
Consolidated Financial Statements |
|
|
Consolidated Statements of Operations |
|
49 |
Consolidated Balance Sheets |
|
50 |
Consolidated Statements of Shareholders Equity |
|
50 |
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income |
|
51 |
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows |
|
51 |
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements |
|
52 |
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Overview
The following discussion summarizes significant factors affecting the consolidated operating
results and financial condition of Ritchie Bros. Auctioneers Incorporated (Ritchie Bros., the
Company, we or us) for the year ended December 31, 2008 compared to the year ended December
31, 2007. This discussion should be read in conjunction with our audited consolidated financial
statements for the year ended December 31, 2008 and notes thereto, and with the disclosures below
regarding forward-looking statements and risk factors. The date of this discussion is as of
February 23, 2009. Additional information relating to our company, including our Annual Information
Form, is available by accessing the SEDAR website at www.sedar.com. None of the information on the
SEDAR website is incorporated by reference into this document by this or any other reference.
We prepare our consolidated financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting
principles in Canada, or Canadian GAAP. There are no material measurement differences between the
financial position and results of operations reflected on those financial statements and the
financial position and results of operations that would be reported under generally accepted
accounting principles in the United States, or U.S. GAAP, except as described in note 13 to the
audited consolidated financial statements. Amounts discussed below are based on our audited
consolidated financial statements prepared in accordance with Canadian GAAP and are presented in
United States dollars. Unless indicated otherwise, all tabular and related footnote dollar amounts
presented below are expressed in thousands of dollars, except per share amounts.
Ritchie Bros. is the worlds largest industrial auctioneer, selling more equipment to on-site and
online bidders than any other company in the world. Our world headquarters are located in Richmond,
British Columbia, Canada, and as of the date of this discussion, we operated from over 110
locations in more than 25 countries, including 38 auction sites worldwide. We sell, through
unreserved public auctions, a broad range of used and unused industrial assets, including
equipment, trucks and other assets utilized in the construction, transportation, agricultural,
material handling, mining, forestry, petroleum and marine industries. Our purpose is to use
unreserved auctions to create a global marketplace for our customers.
We operate mainly in the auction segment of the global industrial equipment marketplace. Our
primary target markets within that marketplace are the used truck and equipment sectors, which are
large and fragmented. The world market for used trucks and equipment continues to grow, primarily
as a result of the increasing, cumulative supply of used trucks and equipment, which is driven by
the ongoing production of new trucks and equipment. Industry analysts estimate that the world-wide
value of used equipment transactions, of the type of equipment we sell at our auctions, is
approximately $100 billion per year. Although we sell more used equipment than any other company in
the world, our share of this fragmented market is only in the range 3%.
In 2008, approximately 80%
of the lots at our auctions were purchased by end users of equipment (retail buyers), such as
contractors, with the remainder being sold primarily to truck and equipment dealers and brokers
(wholesale buyers). This is roughly consistent with the relative proportions of buyers in recent
periods. Consignors to our auctions represent a broad mix of equipment owners, the majority being
end users of equipment, with the balance being finance companies, truck and equipment dealers and
equipment rental companies, among others. Consignment volumes at our auctions are affected by a
number of factors, including regular fleet upgrades and reconfigurations, financial pressure,
retirements, and inventory reductions, as well as by the timing of the completion of major
construction and other projects.
We compete directly for potential purchasers of industrial assets with other auction companies. Our
indirect competitors include truck and equipment manufacturers, distributors and dealers that sell
new or used industrial assets, and equipment rental companies that offer an alternative to
purchasing. When sourcing equipment to sell at our auctions, we
compete with other auction companies, truck and equipment dealers and brokers, and equipment owners
that have traditionally disposed of equipment through private sales.
We have several key strengths that we believe provide distinct competitive advantages and will
enable us to grow and make our auctions more appealing to both buyers and sellers of industrial
assets. Some of our principal strengths include:
à |
Our reputation for conducting only unreserved
auctions and our widely recognized commitment to honesty and fair dealing. |
|
à |
Our ability to transcend local market conditions and create a global marketplace for industrial
assets by attracting diverse audiences of mainly end-user bidders from around the world to our
auctions. |
|
à |
Our size, our financial strength and access to capital, the international scope of our operations,
our extensive network of auction sites, and our marketing skills. |
|
à |
Our ability to enhance our live auctions with technology using our rbauctionBid-Live internet
bidding service. |
|
à |
Our in-depth experience in the marketplace, including our equipment valuation expertise and
proprietary customer and equipment databases. |
|
à |
Our dedicated and experienced workforce, which allows us to, among other things, enter new
geographic markets, structure deals to meet our customers needs and provide high quality and
consistent service to consignors and bidders. |
Strict adherence to the unreserved auction process is one of our founding principles and, we
believe, one of our most significant competitive advantages. When we say unreserved we mean that
there are no minimum bids or reserve prices on anything sold at a Ritchie Bros. auction each item
sells to the highest bidder on sale day, regardless of the price. In addition, consignors (or their
agents) are not allowed to bid on or buy back or in any way influence the selling price of their
own equipment. We maintain this commitment to the unreserved auction process because we believe
that an unreserved auction is a fair auction.
We attract a broad base of bidders from around the world to our auctions. Our worldwide marketing
efforts help to attract bidders, and they are willing to travel long distances or participate
online in part because of our reputation for conducting fair auctions. These multinational bidding
audiences provide a global marketplace that allows our auctions to transcend local market
conditions, which we believe is a significant competitive advantage. Evidence of this is the fact
that in 2008 an average of approximately 60% of the value of equipment sold at our auctions left
the region of the sale.
We believe that our ability to consistently draw significant numbers of local and international
bidders to our auctions, most of whom are end users rather than resellers, is appealing to sellers
of used trucks and equipment and helps us to attract consignments to our auctions. Higher
consignment volumes attract more bidders, which in turn attract more consignments, and so on in a
self-reinforcing process that has helped us to achieve substantial momentum in our business. During
2008, we had over 277,000 bidder registrations at our industrial auctions, compared to
approximately 254,000 in 2007. We received over 36,000 industrial asset consignments (typically
comprised of multiple lots) in 2008, compared to nearly 35,000 in 2007.
In spite of the difficulties being faced by many companies as a result of the current economic
environment, we believe our business remains strong. Financial and economic uncertainty acts as an
incentive for equipment owners to turn their surplus assets into cash quickly, efficiently and for
fair market value, which benefits our business by increasing consignments to our auctions. In
addition, at our auctions in the fourth quarter of 2008 and to date in 2009, we have not
experienced any meaningful decrease in the number of bidder registrations; our strategy (please see
further discussion below) is designed in part to increase our share of the large and highly
fragmented used equipment market, and market share gains tend not to be impacted by economic
uncertainty. Also, there is still a significant amount of infrastructure and other construction
projects being undertaken around the world, which means there are still many equipment owners
buying and selling equipment, which benefits our business by generating activity at our auctions.
In our
RITCHIE BROS. AUCTIONEERS | 2008 ANNUAL REPORT 35
experience over the last 50 years, when cash flow or credit is tight and there is uncertainty in
the market, traditional buyers of new equipment are more likely to look for good quality, late
model used equipment, resulting in steady demand for equipment at our auctions. That being said,
our customers so far do not appear to be having material difficulty accessing credit to fund their
auction purchases, as most of the main participants in the equipment finance world are still
offering credit to buyers of equipment. Although equipment prices generally trended down in the
latter half of 2008, the decreases have not been dramatic; in past downward cycles we have
generally seen price decreases more than offset by increased consignment volumes at our auctions.
We have re-examined our growth strategy, including operating and capital plans, and overall we
continue to believe our business model is well suited to current economic conditions. We also
believe that designing and executing our strategy will continue to be a more significant
determinant of our ability to grow our earnings than the macro economic environment, in part
because our share of the world market for used trucks and equipment is so small, while the market
continues to grow in good times and bad with the ongoing sale of new equipment.
Growth Strategies
Our long-term mission is to be the worlds largest marketplace for commercial and industrial
assets. Our principal goals are to grow our earnings per share at a manageable pace over the long
term while maintaining a reasonable return on invested capital, and to maintain the Ritchie Bros.
culture. Our preference is to pursue sustainable growth with a consistently high level of customer
service, rather than targeting aggressive growth and risking erosion of the strong customer
relationships and high level of customer service that we believe differentiate us from our
competitors.
To grow our business, we are focusing simultaneously on three different fronts, and we believe
these three key components of our strategy work in unison.
1. |
Our people |
|
|
People are a key driver of our growth, and one of our key strategies is to build the team that will
help us achieve our goals. This includes recruiting, training and developing the right people, as
well as enhancing the productivity of our sales force and our administrative support teams by
giving them the tools and training they need to be effective. This component of our strategy also
includes active succession planning and leadership development, with a focus on developing
employees from within our company. |
|
|
Our ability to recruit, train and retain capable new members for our sales team has a significant
influence on our rate of growth. Ours is a relationship business and our Territory Managers are the
main point of contact with our customers. We look for bright, hard-working individuals with
positive attitudes, and we are committed to providing our people with a great workplace and
opportunities to grow with the company and become future leaders of our global team. |
|
2. |
Our places |
|
|
We intend to continue to expand our presence in existing markets and enter new markets, and to
expand our international auction site network to handle expected growth in our business. When we
talk about markets, we are referring to geographic markets and industry sectors. |
|
|
Although we expect
that most of our growth in the near future will come from expanding our business and increasing our
penetration in regions where we already have a presence, such as the United States and Western
Europe, we anticipate that emerging markets in developing countries will be important in the longer
term. Our sales offices in many of these emerging markets have been established to position us to
take advantage of these future growth opportunities and we will continue to invest in frontier
markets in the future. |
|
|
We plan to expand our worldwide network of auction sites, opening an average of at least two new or
replacement sites per year. Our shorter-term focus for this expansion is the United States and
Western Europe. In addition, we intend to continue to hold off-site auctions in new regions to
expand the scope of our operations. |
|
|
We also aim to increase our market share in our core markets of construction, transportation and
agricultural equipment, and to sell more assets in categories that are complementary to these core
markets. Examples of these complementary categories include mining, forestry and petroleum assets. |
|
3. |
Our processes |
|
|
We are committed to developing and continually refining the processes and systems that we use to
conduct our business. We believe that this continuous improvement focus will allow us to grow our
revenues faster than our operating costs in the future. We also intend to use technology to
facilitate our growth and enhance the quality and service level of our auctions. |
|
|
Over the past few years, we have made significant progress in developing business processes and
systems that are efficient, consistent and scalable, including the successful implementation of a
new enterprise resource planning (or ERP) system. |
|
We believe that these three components work together because our people help us to achieve our
growth objectives, our places give us focus areas for and the capacity to handle growth, and our
processes help us to achieve that growth with efficiency and consistency and deliver value to our
customers. |
Operations
The majority of our industrial auctions are held at our permanent auction sites, where we own the
land and facilities, or at regional auction units, where we lease the land and typically have more
modest facilities. We also hold off-site auctions at temporary locations, often on land owned by
one of the main consignors to the particular auction. Most of our agricultural auctions are
off-site auctions that take place on the consignors farm. During 2008, 89% of the gross auction
proceeds from our auctions was attributable to auctions held at our permanent auction sites and
regional auction units (2007 88%). Gross auction proceeds represent the total proceeds from all
items sold at our auctions (please see Sources of Revenue and Revenue Recognition below).
During
2008, we conducted 193 unreserved industrial auctions at locations in North America, Europe, the
Middle East, South East Asia and Australia (2007 183 auctions). We also held 147 unreserved
agricultural auctions during the year, primarily in Canada and the United States (2007 177).
Although our auctions have varied in size over the last 12 months, our average industrial auction
in 2008 attracted over 1,400 bidder registrations (2007 almost 1,400) and featured over 1,300
lots (2007 over 1,400) consigned by 189 consignors (2007 191), generating average gross auction
proceeds of approximately $17.7 million, compared to approximately $16.7 million in 2007. Our
agricultural auctions in 2008 averaged approximately $0.9 million in size, compared to $0.7 million
in 2007.
In 2008, approximately 54% of our auction revenues was earned from operations in the
United States (2007 56%), 21% was earned in Canada (2007 23%) and the remaining 25% was earned
from operations in countries other than the United States and Canada (primarily Europe, the Middle
East, Australia, and Mexico) (2007 21%). We had 1,077 full-time employees at December 31, 2008,
including 265 sales representatives and 29 trainee territory managers, compared to 943, 265 and 11,
respectively, at the end of 2007.
We are a public company and our common shares are listed under the symbol RBA on the New York and
Toronto Stock Exchanges. On February 23, 2009 we had 104,899,720 common shares issued and
outstanding and stock options outstanding to purchase a total of 2,461,634 common shares. On April
24, 2008, our issued and outstanding common shares were split on a three-for-one basis. All share
and per share amounts in this document reflect the stock split on a retroactive basis.
Sources of Revenue and Revenue Recognition
Gross auction proceeds represent the total proceeds from all items sold at our auctions. Our
definition of gross auction proceeds may differ from those used by other participants in our
industry. Gross auction proceeds is an important measure we use in comparing and assessing our
operating performance. It is not a measure of our financial performance, liquidity or revenue and
is not presented in our consolidated financial statements. We believe that auction revenues, which
is the most directly comparable measure in our Statements of Operations, and certain other line
items, are best understood by considering their relationship to gross auction proceeds. Auction
revenues represent the revenues we earn in the course of conducting our auctions. The portion of
gross auction proceeds that we do not retain is remitted to our customers who consign the items we
sell at our auctions.
Auction revenues are comprised of auction commissions earned from consignors through straight
commission and guarantee contracts, net profits or losses on the sale of inventory items,
administrative and documentation fees on the sale of certain lots, auction advertising fees, and
the fees applicable to purchases made through our internet and proxy bidding systems. All revenue
is recognized when the auction sale is complete and we have determined that the auction proceeds
are collectible.
Effective January 1, 2008, we made certain reclassifications in our Statements of Operations that
affected our reported auction revenues. Interest income, which was previously included as part of
auction revenues, is now recorded in other income. Auction advertising fees and documentation
fees, which were previously recorded as an offset to direct expenses, are now included in auction
revenues. These changes were made to improve the presentation in our financial statements and had
no impact on our net earnings. Our comparative historical quarterly financial results have been
reclassified to conform with the presentation adopted in 2008.
Straight commissions are our most common type of auction revenues and are generated when we act as
agent for consignors and earn a pre-negotiated, fixed commission rate on the gross sales price of
the consigned equipment at auction. In 2008, straight commission sales represented approximately
75% of gross auction proceeds volume, which is consistent with the annual straight commission
proportion in recent years.
In some situations, we guarantee minimum sales proceeds to the consignor and earn a commission
based on the actual results of the auction, typically including a pre-negotiated percentage of any
sales proceeds in excess of the guaranteed amount. The consigned equipment is sold on an unreserved
basis in the same manner as other consignments. If the actual auction proceeds are less than the
guaranteed amount, our commission is reduced, and if proceeds are sufficiently less, we can incur a
loss on the sale.
Our financial exposure from guarantee contracts fluctuates over time, but our industrial and
agricultural auction guarantees have had an average period of exposure (days remaining until date
of auction as at quarter-end) of approximately 30 days and 90 days, respectively. The combined
exposure at any time from all outstanding guarantee contracts can fluctuate
36 RITCHIE BROS. AUCTIONEERS | 2008 ANNUAL REPORT
significantly from period to period, but the quarter-end balances averaged approximately $54
million over the last 12 months. As at December 31, 2008, outstanding guarantee contracts totaled
approximately $18 million (2007 $56 million). Losses, if any, resulting from guarantee contracts
are recorded in the period in which the relevant auction is completed, unless the loss is incurred
after the period end but before the financial reporting date, in which case the loss is accrued in
the financial statements for the period end. In 2008, guarantee contracts represented approximately
15% of gross auction proceeds, which is consistent with the annual guarantee proportion in recent
years.
Auction revenues also include the net profit or loss on the sale of inventory in cases where we
acquire ownership of equipment for a short time prior to an auction sale. We purchase equipment for
specific auctions and sell it at those auctions in the same manner as consigned equipment. During
the period that we retain ownership, the cost of the equipment is recorded as inventory on our
balance sheet. The net gain or loss on the sale is recorded as auction revenues. In 2008, inventory
contracts represented approximately 10% of our gross auction proceeds, which is consistent with the
annual inventory sales proportion in recent years. We generally refer to our guarantee and outright
purchase business as our underwritten or at-risk business.
The choice by consignors between straight commission, guarantee, or outright purchase arrangements
depends on many factors, including the consignors risk tolerance and sale objectives. In addition,
we do not have a target for the relative mix of contracts. As a result, the mix of contracts in a
particular quarter or year fluctuates and is not necessarily indicative of the mix in future
periods. The composition of our auction revenues and our auction revenue rate (i.e. auction
revenues as a percentage of gross auction proceeds) are affected by the mix and performance of
contracts entered into with consignors in the particular period and fluctuate from period to
period. Our auction revenue rate performance is presented in the table below.
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Historical auction revenue rates have been restated to conform with the presentation adopted in
2008. The revised presentation had an insignificant impact on auction revenue rates for the periods
2003 through 2007. On an annual basis, the impact on auction revenue rates during this period was
between one to 12 basis points. |
In 2003, our expected average annual auction revenue rate was 9.50%, and at the end of 2003 we
increased our expected average annual auction revenue rate to the range of 9.50% to 10.00%. At the
beginning of 2008, we made changes to certain of our existing fees charged to our customers,
including the minimum commission rate applicable to low value lots and the consignor document and
administration fees. These fees were increased slightly to reflect increased costs of conducting
auctions. In addition, effective January 2008, we reclassified our interest income to other
income and made certain other revenue classifications, as discussed above under Sources of
Revenue and Revenue Recognition. As a result of these fee changes and reclassifications, we
increased our expected annual average auction revenue rate to be in the range of 9.75% to 10.25%.
However, our past experience has shown that our auction revenue rate is difficult to estimate
precisely, meaning our actual auction revenue rate in future periods may be above or below our
expected range. For 2008, we achieved an auction revenue rate of 9.95% (2007 9.79%).
The largest contributor to the variability in our auction revenue rate is the performance, rather
than the amount, of our underwritten business. In a period when our underwritten business performs
better than average, our auction revenue rate typically exceeds the expected average rate.
Conversely, if our underwritten business performs below average, our auction revenue rate will
typically be below the expected average rate.
Our gross auction proceeds and auction revenues are influenced by the seasonal nature of the
auction business, which is determined mainly by the seasonal nature of the construction and natural
resource industries. Gross auction proceeds and auction revenues tend to be higher during the
second and fourth calendar quarters, during which time we generally conduct more business than in
the first and third calendar quarters. This seasonality contributes to quarterly variability in our
net earnings because a significant portion of our operating costs is relatively fixed.
Gross
auction proceeds and auction revenues are also affected on a period-to-period basis by the timing of major auctions. In
newer markets where we are developing operations, the number and size of auctions and, as a result,
the level of gross auction proceeds and auction revenues, are likely to vary more dramatically from
period to period than in our established markets where the number, size and frequency of our
auctions are more consistent. In addition, economies of scale are achieved as our operations in a
region evolve from conducting intermittent auctions, to establishing a regional auction unit, and
ultimately to developing a permanent auction site. Economies of scale are also achieved when our
auctions increase in size.
Because of these seasonal and period-to-period variations, we believe that gross auction proceeds
and auction revenues are best compared on an annual basis, rather than on a quarterly basis.
Developments in 2008
Highlights of the year ended December 31, 2008, our 50th anniversary year, included:
People
à |
|
On April 25, 2008, our Board of Directors appointed Robert S. Armstrong Chief Operating Officer
(formerly Chief Financial Officer and Chief Operating Officer) and Robert A. McLeod Chief Financial
Officer (formerly Director, Global Accounting). |
|
|
|
In addition to Mr. Armstrong and Mr. McLeod, our other executive officers with effect from January
1, 2008 are as follows: |
|
|
|
Peter Blake, Chief Executive Officer; |
|
|
|
Robert Mackay, President (formerly President United States, Asia and Australia); |
|
|
|
Robert Whitsit, Senior Vice-President (formerly Senior Vice-President Southeast and Northeast
Divisions); |
|
|
|
David Nicholson, Senior Vice-President Central United States, Mexico and South America
(formerly Senior Vice-President South Central United States, Mexico and South America Divisions); |
|
|
|
Guylain Turgeon, Senior Vice-President Managing Director Europe, Middle East and Asia (formerly
Senior Vice-President Managing Director European Operations). |
|
|
|
Steven Simpson, Senior Vice-President Western United States (formerly Vice-President, South West
and North West Divisions); |
|
|
|
Curtis Hinkelman, Senior Vice-President Eastern United States (formerly Vice-President, Great
Lakes Division); |
|
|
|
Kevin Tink, Senior Vice-President Canada and Agriculture (formerly
Vice-President, Western Canada and Agricultural Divisions); |
|
|
|
Victor Pospiech, Senior Vice-President Administration and Human Resources (formerly
Vice-President, Administration and Human Resources); and |
|
|
|
Jeremy Black, Corporate Secretary and Director, Business Development (formerly Director, Finance). |
|
à |
|
At our annual meeting on April 11, 2008, our shareholders elected Christopher Zimmerman to our
Board of Directors. Our Board appointed Robert W. Murdoch as Chairman, replacing Charles E. Croft
who retired as a director in April 2008. In addition, C. Russell Cmolik retired |
RITCHIE BROS. AUCTIONEERS | 2008 ANNUAL REPORT 37
|
|
from our Board in April 2008. With the retirement of Mr. Croft, Mr. Murdoch replaced Mr. Croft as a
member of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee of our Board of Directors. Mr.
Zimmerman was also appointed a member of the Compensation Committee of our Board of Directors. |
|
à |
|
Our Board of Directors increased the size of our Board from six to seven directors, and on April
25, 2008, they appointed a new independent director, James M. Micali, to our Board. Mr. Micali
replaced Edward B. Pitoniak on the Audit Committee of our Board of Directors and is also a member
of the Compensation Committee of our Board of Directors. Mr. Pitoniak was appointed chair of the
Compensation Committee of our Board of Directors. |
Places
à |
|
We held the largest auction in our history, at our permanent auction site in Orlando, Florida, with
gross auction proceeds of $190 million. |
|
à |
|
We broke regional gross auction proceeds records in Fort
Worth, Texas; Las Vegas, Nevada; North East,
Maryland; Atlanta, Georgia; Albuquerque, New Mexico; Toluca, Mexico; Paris, France; Caorso, Italy;
Moncofa, Spain; Brisbane, Australia; and Melbourne, Australia. |
|
à |
|
Our cumulative gross auction
proceeds to online bidders since the launch of our rbauctionBid-Live internet bidding service in
2002 surpassed the $2 billion mark during the year. |
|
à |
|
We held our first auctions at our new permanent
auction sites in Kansas City, Missouri and Paris, France, which replaced our regional auction units
in these areas. |
|
à |
|
We held our first auction in Eastern Europe in Poland. |
|
à |
|
We moved to a new regional auction unit in Moncofa, Spain, which replaced our regional auction unit
in Valencia, Spain, and conducted our largest ever auction in Spain at the new location. |
|
à |
|
We moved to a new regional auction unit in Geelong, Australia, which replaced our regional auction
unit in Melbourne, Australia. |
|
à |
|
We established a new regional auction unit in Las Vegas, Nevada. |
|
à |
|
We completed the purchase of approximately 25 acres of land in Chilliwack, British Columbia, on
which we are building a new permanent auction site to replace our current permanent facility in
that region. |
|
à |
|
We completed the purchase of approximately 74 acres of land adjoining our permanent auction site in
Orlando, Florida, on which we have expanded our current facility. |
|
à |
|
We completed the purchase of approximately 16 acres of land near Tokyo, Japan, on which we are
building a new permanent auction site, an important step in our strategy to expand our presence in
the Asian market. |
|
à |
|
We completed the sale of our headquarters property located in Richmond, British Columbia, and
entered into a leaseback arrangement with the purchaser. This sale transaction resulted in a
pre-tax gain of approximately $8.3 million. |
|
à |
|
We entered into a sale-leaseback arrangement for our new headquarters building under construction
in Burnaby, British Columbia, and committed to a long-term lease of the property with the purchaser
upon construction completion, which is expected to occur in the later half of 2009. |
Processes
à |
|
We introduced our Electronic Auction Clerking software, which relays auction information instantly
between the auctioneer, clerk and administrative offices. The system has resulted in significant
efficiency gains at our auctions. |
|
à |
|
We continued to roll out our Virtual Ramp technology to auction sites around the world. The Virtual
Ramp, which projects photos of items being auctioned onto a large screen, is used to increase
speed, efficiency and bidder comfort when selling stationary equipment items at our auctions. |
|
à |
|
We began accepting credit card payments from on-site and online bidders in the United States,
Canada, Australia, the Middle East and most countries in Europe. |
|
à |
|
We entered into a partnership with uShip to provide real-time shipping estimates and competitive
shipping quotes through our web site, rbauction.com, for our auctions in the United States and
Canada. |
Other
à |
|
On April 24, 2008, our issued and outstanding common shares split on a three-for-one basis. All
share and per share information in this document gives effect to the stock split on a retroactive
basis, unless indicated otherwise. |
|
à |
|
We entered into a new five-year committed credit facility and a new three-year uncommitted credit
facility, increasing our available credit facilities to approximately $550 million. We have entered
into these credit facilities to give us long-term flexibility and access to capital to support
future growth initiatives. |
|
à |
|
Our common stock was added to the S&P/TSX Composite Index for the first time. |
Subsequent to year end, we completed the construction of and relocated to our new permanent auction
facilities in Houston, Texas and Minneapolis, Minnesota, and will be holding our first auctions at
the new sites in the first quarter of 2009. In addition, we closed our regional auction unit in
Singapore as we were unable to renew the lease at that location.
Overall Performance
For the year ended December 31, 2008, we recorded auction revenues of $354.8 million and net
earnings of $101.4 million, or $0.96 per diluted common share. This compares to auction revenues of
$311.9 million and net earnings of $76.0 million, or $0.72 per diluted share for the year ended
December 31, 2007. We ended 2008 with working capital of $47.1 million, compared to $58.2 million
at December 31, 2007.
Adjusted net earnings for the year ended December 31, 2008 were $85.5 million, or $0.81 per diluted
share, which compares to adjusted net earnings of $71.9 million, or $0.68 per diluted share for the
year ended December 31, 2007. We define adjusted net earnings as financial statement net earnings
excluding the after-tax effects of sales of excess properties and significant foreign exchange
gains or losses resulting from financing activities that we do not expect to recur in the future
(please see our reconciliation below).
Adjusted net earnings is a non-GAAP financial measure that does not have a standardized meaning,
and is therefore unlikely to be comparable to similar measures presented by other companies. We
believe that comparing adjusted net earnings as defined above for different financial periods
provides more useful information about the growth or decline of net earnings for the relevant
financial period, and isolates the impact of items which we do not consider to be part of our
normal operating results.
Our adjusted net earnings in 2008 grew by approximately 19% compared to 2007 primarily as a result
of increased gross auction proceeds and a stronger auction revenue rate, partially offset by higher
operating costs.
A reconciliation of our net earnings under Canadian GAAP to adjusted net earnings is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended December 31, |
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
Net earnings under Canadian GAAP |
|
$ |
101,400 |
|
|
$ |
75,983 |
|
Gain on sale of excess property(1) |
|
|
(8,304 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Net foreign exchange impact
on financing transactions(2) |
|
|
(9,188 |
) |
|
|
(4,789 |
) |
Tax relating to reconciling items |
|
|
1,571 |
|
|
|
696 |
|
|
Adjusted net earnings |
|
$ |
85,479 |
|
|
$ |
71,890 |
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
In 2008, we recorded a gain of $8,304 ($7,295, or $0.07 per diluted share, after tax) on the
sale of our headquarters property located in Richmond, British Columbia. |
|
(2) |
|
During the year ended December 31, 2008, we reclassified to net earnings foreign currency
translation gains reported in the cumulated translation adjustment account of $15,023 ($13,615, or
$0.13 per diluted share, after tax) as a result of the settlement of a number of foreign currency
denominated intercompany loans that were considered long-term in nature. We did not settle any
intercompany loans in 2007. In addition, during the year ended December 31, 2008, we recorded a
foreign exchange loss of $5,835 ($4,989, or $0.05 per diluted share, after tax) on U.S. dollar
denominated bank debt held by a subsidiary that has the Canadian dollar as its functional currency.
The equivalent amount in 2007 was a foreign exchange gain of $4,789 ($4,093, or $0.04 per diluted
share, after tax). We have highlighted this amount because subsequent to December 31, 2008, the
Canadian subsidiary assigned the bank debt to an affiliate whose functional currency is the U.S.
dollar to eliminate the impact of these currency fluctuations in the future. As such, we do not
expect such foreign exchange gains or losses to recur in future periods. |
Selected Annual Information
The following selected consolidated financial information as at December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006
and for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2008 has been derived from
our audited consolidated financial statements. This data should be read together with those
financial statements and the risk factors described below.
Our consolidated financial statements are prepared in United States dollars in accordance with
Canadian GAAP. These principles conform in all material respects with U.S. GAAP, except as
disclosed in note 13 of our consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2008.
38 RITCHIE BROS. AUCTIONEERS | 2008 ANNUAL REPORT
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, |
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
Statement of Operations Data: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Auction revenues (1) |
|
$ |
354,818 |
|
|
$ |
311,906 |
|
|
$ |
257,857 |
|
Direct
expenses (2) |
|
|
(49,750 |
) |
|
|
(46,481 |
) |
|
|
(40,457 |
) |
|
|
|
|
305,068 |
|
|
|
265,425 |
|
|
|
217,400 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating
expenses (3) |
|
|
(189,320 |
) |
|
|
(164,233 |
) |
|
|
(132,731 |
) |
Other income (4) |
|
|
23,536 |
|
|
|
10,703 |
|
|
|
7,397 |
|
|
Earnings before income taxes |
|
|
139,284 |
|
|
|
111,895 |
|
|
|
92,066 |
|
Income taxes |
|
|
37,884 |
|
|
|
35,912 |
|
|
|
34,848 |
|
|
Net earnings |
|
$ |
101,400 |
|
|
$ |
75,983 |
|
|
$ |
57,218 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings per share basic |
|
$ |
0.97 |
|
|
$ |
0.73 |
|
|
$ |
0.55 |
|
Net earnings per share diluted |
|
|
0.96 |
|
|
|
0.72 |
|
|
|
0.55 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash
dividends declared per share (5) |
|
$ |
0.34 |
|
|
$ |
0.30 |
|
|
$ |
0.26 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance Sheet Data (year end): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Working capital (including cash) |
|
$ |
47,109 |
|
|
$ |
58,207 |
|
|
$ |
94,369 |
|
Capital assets |
|
|
453,642 |
|
|
|
390,044 |
|
|
|
285,091 |
|
Total assets |
|
|
689,488 |
|
|
|
672,887 |
|
|
|
554,227 |
|
Long-term liabilities |
|
|
77,495 |
|
|
|
58,793 |
|
|
|
51,892 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Statement of Cash Flows Data: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital asset additions |
|
$ |
145,024 |
|
|
$ |
113,219 |
|
|
$ |
51,239 |
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Auction revenues are comprised of commissions earned from consignors through straight
commission and guarantee contracts, the net profit or loss on the sale of inventory items, internet
and proxy purchase fees, administrative and documentation fees on the sale of certain lots, and
auction advertising fees. Auction revenues for 2007 and 2006 have been reclassified to conform with
the presentation adopted in 2008. Please see further discussion in Sources of Revenue and Revenue
Recognition. |
|
(2) |
|
Direct expenses for 2007 and 2006 have been reclassified to conform with the presentation
adopted in 2008. Please see further discussion in Sources of Revenue and Revenue Recognition. |
|
(3) |
|
Operating expenses include depreciation and amortization and general and administrative
expenses. |
|
(4) |
|
Other income in 2008 included an $8,304 ($7,295, or $0.07 per diluted share, after tax) gain
recorded on the sale of our headquarters property located in Richmond, British Columbia; and in
2006 included the $1,589 ($953, or $0.01 per diluted share, after tax) net effect of a gain
recorded on the sale of excess property in Florida and a write-down of land held for sale in Texas.
In addition, other income in 2008 included the reclassification of $15,023 ($13,615, or $0.13 per
diluted share, after tax) of foreign currency translation gains relating to the settlement of
foreign currency denominated intercompany loans, partially offset by a $5,835 million ($4,989,
$0.05 per diluted share, after tax) foreign exchange loss relating to U.S. dollar denominated bank
debt held by a Canadian subsidiary. The impact of foreign exchange on the bank debt in 2007 was a
gain of $4,789 ($4,093, or $0.04 per diluted share, after tax) and in 2006 was a loss of $68 ($59,
or less than $0.1 per diluted share, after tax). We have highlighted these amounts because we do
not expect them to recur in future periods. Please see further discussion above in Overall
Performance. |
|
(5) |
|
In addition to the cash dividends declared and paid in 2008, we declared a cash
dividend of $0.09 per common share on January 23, 2009 relating to the quarter ended December 31,
2008, which is not included in this amount. |
Results of Operations
Year Ended December 31, 2008 Compared to Year Ended December 31, 2007
We conduct operations around the world in a number of different currencies, but our reporting
currency is the United States dollar. In 2008, approximately 40% of our revenues and approximately
50% of our operating costs were denominated in currencies other than the United States dollar.
The main currencies other than the United States dollar in which our revenues and operating costs
are denominated are the Canadian dollar and the Euro. In recent periods there have been significant
fluctuations in the value of the Canadian dollar and Euro relative to the United States dollar.
These fluctuations affect our reported auction revenues and operating expenses when non-United
States dollar amounts are converted into United States dollars for financial statement reporting
purposes. It is difficult, if not impossible, to quantify how foreign exchange rate movements
affect such variables as supply and demand for the assets we sell. However, excluding these
impacts, the effect of foreign exchange fluctuations on our translated auction revenues and
operating expenses in our consolidated financial statements has largely offset, making the net
effect of foreign exchange on our annual net earnings insignificant in 2008. Excluding the foreign
exchange impacts on financing transactions discussed in Overall Performance above, our 2008
adjusted net earnings included a $2.5 million pre-tax gain (2007 $2.0 million pre-tax loss)
resulting from the revaluation and settlement of our foreign currency denominated monetary assets
and liabilities.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
United States Dollar Exchange Rate Comparison |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years ended December 31, |
|
2008 |
|
|
% Change |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
% Change |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
Value of one U.S. dollar: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year-end exchange rate: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Canadian dollar |
|
$ |
1.2168 |
|
|
|
22.5 |
% |
|
$ |
0.9937 |
|
|
|
-14.8 |
% |
|
$ |
1.1660 |
|
Euro |
|
|
0.7159 |
|
|
|
4.5 |
% |
|
|
0.685 |
|
|
|
-9.6 |
% |
|
|
0.7575 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average exchange rate: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Canadian dollar |
|
$ |
1.0671 |
|
|
|
-0.6 |
% |
|
$ |
1.0740 |
|
|
|
-5.3 |
% |
|
$ |
1.1344 |
|
Euro |
|
|
0.6839 |
|
|
|
-6.4 |
% |
|
|
0.7305 |
|
|
|
-8.3 |
% |
|
|
0.7969 |
|
RITCHIE BROS. AUCTIONEERS | 2008 ANNUAL REPORT 39
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Auction Revenues |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years ended December 31, |
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
% Change |
|
|
Auction revenues United States (1) |
|
$ |
191,459 |
|
|
$ |
173,983 |
|
|
|
10 |
% |
Auction revenues Canada (1) |
|
|
75,683 |
|
|
|
71,271 |
|
|
|
6 |
% |
Auction revenues Europe (1) |
|
|
54,635 |
|
|
|
38,771 |
|
|
|
41 |
% |
Auction revenues Other (1) |
|
|
33,041 |
|
|
|
27,881 |
|
|
|
19 |
% |
|
Total auction revenues |
|
$ |
354,818 |
|
|
$ |
311,906 |
|
|
|
14 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross auction proceeds |
|
$ |
3,567,160 |
|
|
$ |
3,186,483 |
|
|
|
12 |
% |
Auction revenue rate |
|
|
9.95 |
% |
|
|
9.79 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Information by geographic segment is based on auction location. Auction revenues have been
reclassified to conform with the presentation adopted in 2008. |
Our auction revenues increased in 2008 compared to 2007 primarily as a result of higher gross
auction proceeds in most of our markets around the world, a higher auction revenue rate and
currency fluctuations. Our underwritten business (guarantee and inventory contracts) represented
24% of our total gross auction proceeds in 2008 (25% in 2007), which is in a similar range to the
proportions experienced in recent periods. Our agricultural division generated gross auction
proceeds of $132.5 million in 2008, compared to $131.9 million in 2007.
Our auction revenue rate
was 9.95% for 2008, which was within our expected range of 9.75% to 10.25%. The increase compared
to our experience in 2007 related primarily to the performance of our underwritten business, which
performed better in 2008 than in 2007, as well as the increase in fees discussed above under
Sources of Revenue and Revenue Recognition. We continue to believe our sustainable average
auction revenue rate will be in the range of 9.75% to 10.25%, although our experience has shown
that our auction revenue rate is difficult to estimate precisely. Our actual auction revenue rate
in future periods may be above or below our expected range.
Our auction revenues and our net
earnings are influenced to a great extent by small changes in our auction revenue rate. For
example, a 10 basis point (0.1%) increase or decrease in our auction revenue rate would have
impacted auction revenues by approximately $3.7 million in 2008, of which approximately $2.4
million or $0.02 per share would have flowed through to net earnings after tax in our statement of
operations, assuming no other changes. This factor is important to consider when evaluating our
current and past performance, as well as when judging future prospects.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Direct Expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years ended December 31, |
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
% Change |
|
|
Direct expenses |
|
$ |
49,750 |
|
|
$ |
46,481 |
|
|
|
7 |
% |
Direct expenses as a percentage of
gross auction proceeds |
|
|
1.39 |
% |
|
|
1.46 |
% |
|
|
|
|
Direct expenses are the costs we incur specifically to conduct an auction. Direct expenses include
the costs of hiring temporary personnel to work at the auction, advertising costs directly related
to the auction, travel costs for employees to attend and work at the auction, security hired to
safeguard equipment at the auction site and rental expenses for temporary auction sites. During
2008, direct expenses were also affected by fee reclassifications, as discussed above under
Sources of Revenue and Revenue Recognition and our comparative direct expenses for 2007 have been
reclassified to conform with the presentation adopted in 2008. At each quarter end, we estimate the
direct expenses incurred with respect to auctions completed near the end of the period. In the
subsequent quarter, these accruals are adjusted, to the extent necessary, to reflect actual costs
incurred.
Our direct expense rate, which represents direct expenses as a percentage of gross auction
proceeds, fluctuates from period to period based in part on the size and location of the auctions
we hold during a particular period. The direct expense rate generally decreases as the average size
of our auctions increases. In addition, we usually experience lower direct expense rates for
auctions held at our permanent auction sites compared to auctions held at offsite locations, mainly
as a result of the economies of scale and other efficiencies that we typically experience at
permanent auction sites. Our direct expense rate for 2008 decreased compared to 2007 mostly due to
the increase in the average size of our auctions.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and Amortization Expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years ended December 31, |
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
% Change |
|
|
Depreciation and amortization expense |
|
$ |
24,764 |
|
|
$ |
19,417 |
|
|
|
28 |
% |
Depreciation is calculated on either a straight line or a declining balance basis on capital assets
employed in our business, including buildings, computer hardware and software, automobiles and yard
equipment. Depreciation increased in 2008 compared to 2007 as a result of depreciation
relating to new assets put into service in recent periods, such as our new permanent auction sites
in Kansas City, Missouri and Paris, France, and new computer hardware and software. We expect our
depreciation in future periods to increase in line with our on-going capital expenditures.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
General and Administrative Expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years ended December 31, |
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
% Change |
|
|
General and administrative expenses |
|
$ |
164,556 |
|
|
$ |
144,816 |
|
|
|
14 |
% |
G&A as a percentage of gross
auction proceeds |
|
|
4.61 |
% |
|
|
4.54 |
% |
|
|
|
|
The major categories of general and administrative expenses, or G&A, in order of magnitude in 2008
were as follows:
à |
|
personnel (salaries, wages, bonuses and benefits) approximately 60% of total G&A; |
|
à |
|
information
technology and telecommunications; |
|
à |
|
non-auction related travel; |
|
à |
|
repairs and maintenance; |
|
à |
|
leases and rentals; |
|
à |
|
utilities; |
|
à |
|
property taxes; |
|
à |
|
office supplies; |
|
à |
|
advertising; and |
|
à |
|
dues and fees. |
During 2008, G&A was affected by the reclassification of foreign exchange gain to other income, and
our comparative G&A for 2007 has been reclassified to conform with the presentation adopted in
2008. Our infrastructure and workforce have continued to expand in order to support our growth
objectives, and this, combined with other factors including currency fluctuations and the costs
associated with our business process improvement initiatives, has resulted in an increase in our
G&A. During 2008, the ongoing growth in many aspects of our business, including personnel,
facilities, and infrastructure, was the main reason for the increase in G&A.
Gross auction proceeds continued to increase during 2008, which has necessitated significant
investments in our people, places and processes. Our rapid growth has resulted in additions to our
workforce, which is one of the key components of our strategy. Our future success is dependent upon
adding people to grow our business, building the places required to handle our anticipated future
growth, and developing and implementing processes to help gain efficiencies and improve
consistency. Our sales force and administrative support teams are instrumental in carrying out
these building and development programs and are necessary to facilitate and accommodate that
growth. Personnel costs are the largest component of our G&A, and our workforce increased 14%
between 2007 and 2008. In addition, in order to support our workforce and expanding network of
auction sites, IT infrastructure and communications costs, as well as facility-related expenses,
increased in 2008 compared to 2007. Our ongoing expansion will continue to influence future levels
of G&A.
The impact of foreign currency fluctuations on our G&A expenses was an increase of approximately
$2.0 million when our foreign operations expenses were translated into our reporting currency, the
U.S. dollar.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest Expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years ended December 31, |
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
% Change |
|
|
Interest expense |
|
$ |
859 |
|
|
$ |
1,206 |
|
|
|
-29 |
% |
Interest expense is comprised mainly of interest paid on long-term debt and operating credit lines.
Interest expense decreased in 2008 compared to 2007 primarily because of an increase in the amount
of interest we capitalized to property under development, partially offset by an increase in
interest costs due to an increased level of borrowings.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest Income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years ended December 31, |
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
% Change |
|
|
Interest income |
|
$ |
4,994 |
|
|
$ |
7,393 |
|
|
|
-32 |
% |
Interest income, which is earned on our invested excess cash balances in conservative and liquid
investments, is mostly affected by market interest rates. In recent periods, market interest rates
in Canada and the United States have decreased significantly, which resulted in a decrease in our
interest income. In addition, our interest income can fluctuate from period
40 RITCHIE BROS. AUCTIONEERS | 2008 ANNUAL REPORT
to period depending on our cash position, which is affected by the timing, size and number of
auctions held during the period, as well as the timing of the receipt of auction proceeds from
buyers and payments to consignors.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign exchange gain |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years ended December 31, |
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
% Change |
|
|
Foreign exchange gain |
|
$ |
11,656 |
|
|
$ |
2,802 |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
Foreign exchange gains or losses arise when foreign currency denominated monetary items are
revalued to the exchange rates in effect at the end of the period. The amount of gain or loss
recognized in any given period is affected by changes in foreign exchange rates as well as the
composition of our foreign currency denominated assets and liabilities. In 2008, foreign exchange
included the reclassification of foreign exchange translation gains of $15.0 million from the
cumulative translation adjustment account as a result of the settlement of a number of foreign
currency denominated intercompany loans that were considered long-term. We did not settle any
intercompany loans in 2007. Partially offsetting the gain in 2008 was a $5.8 million foreign
exchange loss on U.S. dollar denominated bank debt held by a subsidiary that has the Canadian
dollar as its functional currency. The equivalent amount recorded in 2007 was a foreign exchange
gain of $4.8 million. We do not expect the items related to foreign exchange on internal and
external financing transactions to recur in future periods (please refer to discussion above under
Overall Performance).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gain on Disposition of Capital Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years ended December 31, |
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
% Change |
|
|
Gain on disposition of capital assets |
|
$ |
6,370 |
|
|
$ |
243 |
|
|
|
N/A |
|
The gain on disposition of capital assets in 2008 included an $8.3 million gain recorded on the
sale of our headquarters property located in Richmond, British Columbia, partially offset by write
offs of costs incurred on property and software development projects that were no longer considered
viable.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income Taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years ended December 31, |
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
% Change |
|
|
Income taxes |
|
$ |
37,884 |
|
|
$ |
35,912 |
|
|
|
5 |
% |
Effective income tax rate |
|
|
27.2 |
% |
|
|
32.1 |
% |
|
|
|
|
Income taxes have been calculated using the tax rates in effect in each of the tax jurisdictions in
which we earn our income. The effective tax rate for the year ended December 31, 2008 was lower
than the rate we experienced in 2007 as a result of adjustments recorded in 2008 to reflect our
actual cash tax expenses arising from our 2007 income tax filings, and a lower proportion of our
earnings being earned in higher tax rate jurisdictions in 2008. In addition, the gain recorded on
the sale of the headquarters property, as well as the foreign exchange gains on financing
transactions, were subject to a lower tax rate. Income tax rates in future periods will fluctuate
depending upon the impact of unusual items and the level of earnings in the different tax
jurisdictions in which we earn our income.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Earnings |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years ended December 31, |
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
% Change |
|
|
Net earnings before income taxes |
|
$ |
139,284 |
|
|
$ |
111,895 |
|
|
|
24 |
% |
Net earnings |
|
|
101,400 |
|
|
|
75,983 |
|
|
|
33 |
% |
Net earnings per share basic |
|
|
0.97 |
|
|
|
0.73 |
|
|
|
33 |
% |
Net earnings per share diluted |
|
|
0.96 |
|
|
|
0.72 |
|
|
|
33 |
% |
Our net earnings increased in 2008 compared to 2007 as a result of higher gross auction proceeds
and a higher auction revenue rate, partially offset by higher operating costs. In addition, net
earnings in 2008 included a $7.3 million after-tax gain on the sale of excess property, and a net
after-tax foreign exchange gain on financing transactions of $8.6 million, which we do not expect
to recur in future periods. Adjusted net earnings for 2008 were $85.5 million, or $0.81 per diluted
share, compared to adjusted net earnings of $71.9 million, or $0.68 per diluted share in 2007,
representing a 19% increase. Adjusted net earnings in 2008 were higher compared to 2007 primarily
due to increased gross auction proceeds and a higher auction revenue rate, partially offset by
higher operating costs.
Summary of Fourth Quarter Results
We earned auction revenues of $81.7 million and net earnings of $27.1 million, or $0.26 per diluted
share, during the fourth quarter of 2008. Adjusted net earnings for the fourth quarter
of 2008 were $19.2 million, or $0.18 per diluted share. This compares to auction revenues of $82.1
million and net earnings and adjusted net earnings of $16.9 million, or $0.16 per diluted share, in
the fourth quarter of 2007.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter ended December 31, |
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
Net earnings under Canadian GAAP |
|
$ |
27,140 |
|
|
$ |
16,966 |
|
Net foreign exchange impact on internal
and external financing transactions(1) |
|
|
(8,476 |
) |
|
|
(24 |
) |
Tax relating to reconciling items |
|
|
558 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
Adjusted net earnings |
|
$ |
19,222 |
|
|
$ |
16,945 |
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
During the quarter ended December 31, 2008, we reclassified to net earnings foreign currency
translation gains reported in the cumulative translation adjustment account of $12,254 ($11,148, or
$0.11 per diluted share, after tax) as a result of the settlement of a foreign currency denominated
intercompany loans that was considered long-term in nature.
We did not settle any intercompany loans in 2007. In addition, during the quarter ended December
31, 2008, we recorded a foreign exchange loss of $3,778 ($3,230, or $0.03 per diluted share, after
tax) on U.S. dollar denominated bank debt held by a subsidiary that has the Canadian dollar as its
functional currency. The equivalent amount in 2007 was a foreign exchange gain of $24 ($21, or less
than $0.01 per diluted share, after tax). We have highlighted this amount because subsequent to
December 31, 2008, the Canadian subsidiary assigned the bank debt to an affiliate whose functional
currency is the U.S. dollar to eliminate the impact of these currency fluctuations in the future.
As such, we do not expect such foreign exchange gains or losses to recur in future periods. |
Our gross auction proceeds were $853.9 million for the quarter ended December 31, 2008, which is a
decrease of 2% compared to the comparable period in 2007. This decrease in our gross auction
proceeds was mainly attributable to foreign exchange fluctuations in 2008. It is difficult to
isolate the effects of currency fluctuations on our customers buying and selling patterns and
therefore, our gross auction proceeds. However, had the foreign exchange rates in effect in the
fourth quarter of 2007 been applied to the gross auction proceeds achieved in the fourth quarter of
2008, our reported gross auction proceeds would have increased by approximately 7%.
Our auction revenue rate increased to 9.57% in the fourth quarter of 2008 from 9.40% in the
comparable period in 2007, mainly as a result of the stronger performance of our underwritten
business in the fourth quarter of 2008. Our direct expense rate in the fourth quarter of 2008 was
lower compared to 2007 because a higher proportion of gross auction proceeds was earned from
auctions conducted at our permanent auction sites and regional auction units.
Our G&A expenses decreased to $38.3 million in the fourth quarter of 2008, compared to $41.7
million in the comparable 2007 period. During the fourth quarter of 2008, due to foreign currency
fluctuations, the translation into U.S. dollar of our foreign operations G&A expenses resulted in
a decrease in G&A expenses of approximately $4.0 million. Excluding the foreign exchange impact
noted above, G&A in 2008 was roughly consistent with 2007, despite a 14% increase in workforce and
increases in other facility-related expenses resulting from the ongoing expansion of our auction
site network and other infrastructure. This was mostly due to a decrease in the number of IT
initiatives in the fourth quarter of 2008, which resulted in lower support costs.
We experienced a
60% increase in our earnings in the fourth quarter of 2008 compared to the equivalent period in the
prior year primarily due to the non-recurring foreign exchange gain recorded on financing-related
transactions. Adjusted net earnings in the fourth quarter of 2008 increased by 13% compared to
2007, mostly due to lower operating costs in 2008.
Capital asset additions were $47.2 million for the fourth quarter of 2008, compared to $55.9
million in the fourth quarter of 2007. Our capital expenditures in the fourth quarter of 2008
related primarily to construction of our new permanent auction sites in Houston, Texas;
Minneapolis, Minnesota; Grande Prairie, Alberta; Mexico City, Mexico; the expansion of our existing
permanent auction site at Orlando, Florida; and the acquisition of land near Tokyo, Japan. In
addition, we invested in computer software and hardware as part of our process improvement
initiatives. Exchange rate changes relating to capital assets held in currencies other than the
United States dollar resulted in a decrease in our reported capital assets on our consolidated
balance sheet of $14.8 million in the fourth quarter of 2008 compared to an increase of $0.9
million in the equivalent period in 2007.
Summary of Quarterly Results
The following tables present our unaudited consolidated quarterly results of operations for each of
our last eight fiscal quarters. This data has been derived from our unaudited consolidated
financial statements, which were prepared on the same basis as our annual audited consolidated
financial statements and, in our opinion, include all normal recurring adjustments necessary for
the fair presentation of such information. These unaudited quarterly results should be read in
conjunction with our audited consolidated financial statements for the years ended December 31,
2008 and 2007, and our discussion above about the seasonality of our business.
RITCHIE BROS. AUCTIONEERS | 2008 ANNUAL REPORT 41
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Q4 2008 |
|
|
Q3 2008 |
|
|
Q2 2008 |
|
|
Q1 2008 |
|
|
Gross auction proceeds (1) |
|
$ |
853,927 |
|
|
$ |
767,718 |
|
|
$ |
1,163,546 |
|
|
$ |
781,969 |
|
|
|
Auction revenues |
|
$ |
81,693 |
|
|
$ |
75,909 |
|
|
$ |
115,822 |
|
|
$ |
81,394 |
|
Net earnings |
|
|
27,140 |
(2)(3) |
|
|
11,934 |
(2) |
|
|
45,919 |
(2)(3)(4) |
|
|
16,407 |
(2)(3) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings per share basic (6) |
|
$ |
0.26 |
|
|
$ |
0.11 |
|
|
$ |
0.44 |
|
|
$ |
0.16 |
|
Net earnings per share diluted (6) |
|
|
0.26 |
|
|
|
0.11 |
|
|
|
0.43 |
|
|
|
0.16 |
|
|
|
|
Q4 2007 |
|
|
Q3 2007 |
|
|
Q2 2007 |
|
|
Q1 2007 |
|
|
Gross auction proceeds (1) |
|
$ |
873,306 |
|
|
$ |
667,553 |
|
|
$ |
945,256 |
|
|
$ |
700,368 |
|
|
|
Auction revenues (5) |
|
$ |
82,129 |
|
|
$ |
67,174 |
|
|
$ |
94,054 |
|
|
$ |
68,549 |
|
Net earnings |
|
|
16,966 |
(2) |
|
|
14,903 |
(2) |
|
|
26,555 |
(2) |
|
|
17,559 |
(2) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings per share basic (6) |
|
$ |
0.16 |
|
|
$ |
0.14 |
|
|
$ |
0.25 |
|
|
$ |
0.17 |
|
Net earnings per share diluted (6) |
|
|
0.16 |
|
|
|
0.14 |
|
|
|
0.25 |
|
|
|
0.17 |
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Gross auction proceeds represents the total proceeds from all items sold at our auctions. Gross
auction proceeds is not a measure of revenue and is not presented in our consolidated financial
statements. See further discussion above under Sources of Revenue and Revenue Recognition. |
|
(2) |
|
Net earnings included the foreign exchange impact of the U.S. dollar denominated bank debt
held by a Canadian subsidiary, which is not expected to recur in future periods. See further
discussion above under Overall Performance. The foreign exchange impact of this bank debt in the
fourth, third, second and first quarters of 2008 was a $3,778 loss ($3,230, or $0.03 per diluted
share, after tax), $1,276 loss ($1,091, or $0.01 per diluted share, after tax), $205 gain ($175, or
less than $0.01 per diluted share, after tax), and $986 loss ($843, or $0.01 per diluted share,
after tax), respectively. The impact in the fourth, third, second and first quarters of 2007 was
$24 gain ($21, or less than $0.01 per diluted share, after tax), $2,039 gain ($1,742, or $0.02 per
diluted share, after tax), $2,434 gain ($2,080, or $0.02 per diluted share, after tax), and $292
gain ($250, or less than $0.01 per diluted share, after tax), respectively. |
|
(3) |
|
Net earnings in the fourth quarter of 2008 included the reclassification of foreign currency
translation gain of $12,254 ($11,148, or $0.11 per diluted share, after tax) relating to the
settlement of foreign currency denominated intercompany loans. Amounts included in the first and
second quarters of 2008 were $2,089 ($1,960, or $0.02 per diluted share, after tax) and $680 ($507,
or less than $0.01 per diluted share, after tax), respectively. We have highlighted these amounts
as we do not expect these items to recur in future periods. |
|
(4) |
|
Net earnings in the second quarter of 2008 included a gain of $8,304 recorded on the sale of
our headquarters property in Richmond, British Columbia ($7,295, or $0.07 per basic and diluted
share, after tax). Excluding this amount, net earnings would have been $38,624, or $0.37 per basic
and diluted share. |
|
(5) |
|
Auction revenues have been reclassified to conform with the presentation adopted in 2008. |
|
(6) |
|
Net earnings per share amounts have been adjusted on a retroactive basis to reflect the April
24, 2008 three-for-one stock split. |
Liquidity and Capital Resources
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, |
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
% Change |
|
|
Working capital |
|
$ |
47,109 |
|
|
$ |
58,207 |
|
|
|
-19 |
% |
Our cash position can fluctuate significantly from period to period, largely as a result of
differences in the timing, size and number of auctions, the timing of the receipt of auction
proceeds from buyers, and the timing of the payment of net amounts due to consignors. We generally
collect auction proceeds from buyers within seven days of the auction and pay out auction proceeds
to consignors approximately 21 days following an auction. If auctions are conducted near a period
end, we may hold cash in respect of those auctions that will not be paid to consignors until after
the period end. Accordingly, we believe that working capital, including cash, is a more meaningful
measure of our liquidity than cash alone.
There are a number of factors that could potentially impact our working capital, such as current
global economic conditions, which may affect the financial stability of our buyers and their
ability to pay. However, we have substantial borrowing capacity in the event of any temporary
working capital requirements. As at December 31, 2008, we have $512 million of unused credit
facilities, of which $170 million is a five-year committed credit facility expiring in January
2014, and $250 million is a three-year uncommitted credit facility expiring in November 2011. We
believe our existing working capital and established credit facilities are sufficient to satisfy
our present operating requirements, as well as to fund future growth initiatives, such as property
acquisitions and development. Our access to capital resources has not been impacted
by the current credit environment, and we do not expect that the current economic environment will
have a material adverse impact on our capital resources or our business in the near future.
However, there can be no assurance that the cost or availability of future borrowings under our
credit facilities will not be affected should there be a prolonged capital market disruption.
Contractual Obligations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payments Due by Year |
|
Total |
|
|
In 2009 |
|
|
In 2010 and 2011 |
|
|
In 2012 and 2013 |
|
|
After 2013 |
|
|
Long-term debt obligations |
|
$ |
67,803 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
42,327 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
25,476 |
|
Operating leases obligations |
|
|
114,910 |
|
|
|
4,967 |
|
|
|
13,853 |
|
|
|
10,126 |
|
|
|
85,964 |
|
Other long-term obligations |
|
|
60 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
60 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total contractual obligations |
|
$ |
182,773 |
|
|
$ |
4,967 |
|
|
$ |
56,240 |
|
|
$ |
10,126 |
|
|
$ |
111,440 |
|
|
Our long-term debt included in the table above is comprised mainly of term loans put in place in
2005 with original terms to maturity of five years, as well as a revolving loan drawn under a
credit facility that is available until January 2014. Our operating leases relate primarily to land
on which we operate regional auction units and administrative offices. These properties are located
in Canada, the United States, Mexico, Italy, Spain, the Netherlands, the United Arab Emirates,
Australia, Singapore, India, Japan and China.
In the normal course of our business, we will sometimes guarantee to a consignor a minimum level of
proceeds in connection with the sale at auction of that consignors equipment. Our total exposure
at December 31, 2008 from these guarantee contracts was $17.9 million (compared to $55.7 million at
December 31, 2007), which will be offset by the proceeds that we will receive from the sale at
auction of the related equipment. We do not record any liability in our financial statements in
respect of these guarantee contracts, and they are not reflected in the contractual obligations
table above.
42 RITCHIE BROS. AUCTIONEERS | 2008 ANNUAL REPORT
Cash Flows
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, |
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
% Change |
|
|
Cash provided by (used in): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operations |
|
$ |
90,688 |
|
|
$ |
101,269 |
|
|
|
-10 |
% |
Investing |
|
|
(110,211 |
) |
|
|
(105,725 |
) |
|
|
-4 |
% |
Financing |
|
|
(6,194 |
) |
|
|
(27,765 |
) |
|
|
78 |
% |
Similar to the discussion above about our cash position, our cash provided by operations can
fluctuate significantly from period to period, largely as a result of differences in the timing,
size and number of auctions during the period, the timing of the receipt of auction proceeds from
buyers, and the timing of the payment of net amounts due to consignors. During 2008, cash used for
the investment in capital assets exceeded our cash provided by operations. As we continue to
execute our strategy to expand our presence in existing and new markets in the near term, cash used
in investing activities may continue to exceed cash provided by our operations. Depending on the
timing of capital expenditures, we may be required to take on additional debt to fund these
investments.
Capital asset additions were $145.0 million for 2008 compared to $113.2 million in
2007. Our capital expenditures in 2008 included construction of our new permanent auction sites in
Houston, Texas; Kansas City, Missouri; Minneapolis, Minnesota; Paris, France; Mexico City, Mexico;
and Grande Prairie, Alberta. They also included the acquisition of land in Chilliwack, British
Columbia; Orlando, Florida and Tokyo, Japan; and investments in computer software and hardware as
part of our process improvement initiatives. Exchange rate changes relating to capital assets held
in currencies other than the United States dollar, which are not reflected as capital asset
additions on the consolidated statements of cash flows, resulted in a decrease of $26.0 million in
the capital assets reported on our consolidated balance sheet as at December 31, 2008, compared to
an $18.2 million increase in 2007.
We intend to enhance our network of auction sites by adding facilities in selected locations around
the world as appropriate opportunities arise, either to replace existing auction facilities or to
establish new sites. Our actual expenditure levels in future periods will depend largely on our
ability to identify, acquire and develop suitable auction sites. We intend to add or replace at
least two auction sites per year.
For the next several years, we expect that our average annual capital expenditures will be in the
range of $150 million per year, as we continue to invest in the expansion of our network of auction
facilities and fund our process improvement initiatives. Actual capital expenditures will vary,
depending on the availability and cost of suitable expansion opportunities and prevailing business
and economic conditions. Depending on the scope of the required system improvements, the process
improvement expenditures will likely be primarily for hardware, the development, purchase and
implementation of software, and related systems. We expect to fund future capital expenditures
primarily from operating cash flows and credit facilities.
We paid regular cash dividends of $0.09 per share during the each of the quarters ended December 31
and September 30, 2008, and $0.08 per share during each of the quarters ended June 30 and March 31,
2008. Total dividend payments were $35.6 million for 2008, compared to $31.3 million in 2007. On
January 23, 2009, our Board of Directors declared a quarterly cash dividend of $0.09 per common
share relating to the quarter ended December 31, 2008. The dividend will be payable on March 13,
2009 to shareholders of record on February 23, 2009 in the aggregate amount of approximately $9.4
million. All dividends we pay are eligible dividends for Canadian income tax purposes unless
indicated otherwise.
Long-term Debt and Credit Facilities
Our long-term debt and available credit facilities at December 31, 2008 and December 31, 2007 were
as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2008 |
|
|
December 31, 2007 |
|
|
% Change |
|
|
Long-term debt (including current portion of long-term debt) |
|
$ |
67,411 |
|
|
$ |
45,085 |
|
|
|
50 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revolving credit facilities total available: |
|
$ |
287,792 |
|
|
$ |
132,039 |
|
|
|
|
|
Revolving credit facilities total unused: |
|
$ |
262,316 |
|
|
$ |
122,819 |
|
|
|
|
|
Non-revolving credit facilities total available and unused: |
|
$ |
250,000 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total unused credit facilities |
|
$ |
512,316 |
|
|
$ |
122,819 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Our credit facilities are with financial institutions in the United States, Canada, The Netherlands
and The United Kingdom. Certain of the facilities include commitment fees applicable to the unused
credit amount. During 2008, we increased our revolving credit facilities in Canada by C$20 million
and in Europe by approximately 8 million. In addition, we increased our global credit facilities by
$385 million in 2008. As at December 31, 2008, we had fixed rate and floating rate long-term debt
with interest rates ranging from 2.27% to 5.61%. We were in compliance with all financial covenants
applicable to our debt at December 31, 2008.
Future scheduled interest expenses over the next five years under our existing term debt are as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In 2009 |
|
|
In 2010 |
|
|
In 2011 |
|
|
In 2012 |
|
|
In 2013 |
|
|
Interest expense on long-term debt |
|
$ |
2,808 |
|
|
$ |
2,555 |
|
|
$ |
657 |
|
|
$ |
579 |
|
|
$ |
579 |
|
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosure about Market Risk
Although we cannot accurately anticipate the future effect of inflation on our financial condition
or results of operations, inflation historically has not had a material impact on our operations.
Because we conduct operations in local currencies in countries around the world, yet have the
United States dollar as our reporting currency, we are exposed to currency fluctuations and
exchange rate risk on all operations conducted in currencies other than the United States dollar.
We cannot accurately predict the future effects of foreign currency fluctuations on our financial
condition or results of operations, or quantify their effects on the macroeconomic environment. For
2008, approximately 40% of our revenues were earned in currencies other than the United States
dollar and approximately 50% of our operating costs were denominated in currencies other than the
United States dollar. The proportion of revenues denominated in currencies other than the United
States dollar in a given period will differ from the annual proportion depending on the size and
location of auctions held during the period. We have not adopted a long-term hedging strategy to
protect against foreign currency fluctuations associated with our operations denominated in
currencies other than the United States dollar, but we will consider hedging specific transactions
if we deem them appropriate.
During the year ended December 31, 2008, excluding the impact of the reclassification to net
earnings of foreign currency translation gains $14.9 million, we recorded a decrease in our foreign
currency translation adjustment balance of $26.9 million, compared to an increase of $15.4 million
in 2007. Our foreign currency translation adjustment arises from the translation at the end of each
reporting period of our net assets denominated in currencies other than the United States dollar
into our reporting currency. Changes in this balance arise primarily from the strengthening or
weakening of non-United States currencies against the United States dollar.
We have not experienced significant interest rate exposure historically, as our term debts
generally bear fixed rates of interest. However, borrowings under our new five-year global
revolving credit facility are only available at floating rates of interest. If our portfolio of
floating rate debts increases, we will consider the use of interest rate swaps to mitigate our
exposure to interest rate fluctuations. As at December 31, 2008, we have a $25 million revolving
loan that bears interest at bankers acceptance rate plus a margin.
RITCHIE BROS. AUCTIONEERS | 2008 ANNUAL REPORT 43
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
We have no off-balance sheet arrangements that have or are reasonably likely to have a current or
future material effect on our financial condition, changes in financial condition, revenues or
expenses, results of operations, liquidity, capital expenditures or capital resources.
Legal and Other Proceedings
From time to time we have been, and expect to continue to be, subject to legal proceedings and
claims in the ordinary course of our business. Such claims, even if lacking merit, could result in
the expenditure of significant financial and managerial resources. We are not aware of any legal
proceedings or claims that we believe will have, individually or in the aggregate, a material
adverse effect on us or on our financial condition or results of operation or that involve a claim
for damages, excluding interest and costs, in excess of 10% of our current assets.
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
In preparing our consolidated financial statements in conformity with Canadian GAAP, we must make
decisions that impact the reported amounts and related disclosures. Such decisions include the
selection of the appropriate accounting principles to be applied and the assumptions on which to
base accounting estimates. In reaching such decisions, we apply judgments based on our
understanding and analysis of the relevant circumstances and historical experience. On an ongoing
basis, we evaluate these judgments and estimates, including consideration of uncertainties relating
to revenue recognition criteria, valuation of consignors equipment and other assets subject to
guarantee contracts, recoverability of capital assets, goodwill and future income tax assets, and
the assessment of possible contingent assets or liabilities that should be recognized or disclosed
in our consolidated financial statements. Actual amounts could differ materially from those
estimated by us at the time our consolidated financial statements are prepared.
The following discussion of critical accounting policies and estimates is intended to supplement
the significant accounting policies presented as note 1 to our consolidated financial statements,
which summarizes the accounting policies and methods used in the preparation of those consolidated
financial statements. The policies and the estimates discussed below are included here because they
require more significant judgments and estimates in the preparation and presentation of our
consolidated financial statements than other policies and estimates.
Accounting for Income Taxes
We record income taxes relating to our business in each of the jurisdictions in which we operate.
We estimate our actual current tax exposure and the temporary differences resulting from differing
treatment of items for tax and book accounting purposes. These differences result in future income
tax assets and liabilities, which are included within our consolidated balance sheet. We must then
assess the likelihood that our future income tax assets will be recovered from future taxable
income. If recovery of these future tax assets is considered unlikely, we must establish a
valuation allowance. To the extent we either establish or increase a valuation allowance in a
period, we must include an expense within the tax provision in the consolidated statement of
operations. Significant management judgment is required in determining our provision for income
taxes, our measurement of future tax assets and liabilities, and any valuation allowance recorded
against our net future tax assets. If actual results differ from these estimates or we adjust these
estimates in future periods, we may need to establish a valuation allowance that could materially
impact the presentation of our financial position and results of operations.
Valuation of Goodwill
We assess the possible impairment of goodwill in accordance with standards issued by the Canadian
Institute of Chartered Accountants in Canada (known as the CICA) and the Financial Accounting
Standards Board in the United States. The standards stipulate that reporting entities test the
carrying value of goodwill for impairment annually at the reporting unit level using a two-step
impairment test; if events or changes in circumstances indicate that the asset might be impaired,
the test is conducted more frequently.
In the first step of the impairment test, the net book value of each reporting unit is compared
with its fair value. We operate as a single reporting unit, which is the consolidated public
company. As a result, we are able to refer to the stock market for a third party indicator of our
companys fair value. As long as the fair value of the reporting unit exceeds its net book value,
goodwill is considered not to be impaired and the subsequent step of the impairment test is
unnecessary. Changes in the market value of our common shares may impact our assessment as to
whether goodwill has been impaired. These changes may result from changes in our business plans or
other factors, including those that are outside our control. We perform the goodwill test each year
as at September 30, or more frequently if events or changes in circumstances indicate that goodwill
might be impaired. We performed the test as at September 30, 2008 and again at December 31, 2008 as
a result of the significant adverse changes in the global economy and capital markets, and
determined that no impairment had occurred.
Changes in Accounting Policies
On January 1, 2008, we adopted CICA Handbook Section 1535, Capital Disclosures, Section 3862,
Financial Instruments Disclosures and Section 3863, Financial Instruments Presentation.
Section 1535 requires the disclosure of both qualitative and quantitative information that enables
users of financial statements to evaluate the entitys objectives, policies and processes for
managing capital. Sections 3862 and 3863 replace Section 3861, Financial Instruments Disclosure
and Presentation, revising and enhancing its disclosure requirements, and carrying forward its
presentation requirements. Additional disclosure requirements pertaining to these sections have
been addressed in the notes to our consolidated financial statements. The adoption of section 3863
had no impact on our presentation of financial instruments.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
In February 2008, the CICA issued Section 3064, Goodwill and Intangible Assets, which is effective
for the Company on January 1, 2009. This section establishes new standards for the recognition and
measurement of intangible assets, but does not affect the accounting for goodwill. We are currently
assessing the impact of these new accounting standards on our financial statements but we do not
expect them to have a material impact on the presentation of our financial condition or results of
operations.
International Financial Reporting Standards
In February 2008, the CICAs Accounting Standards Board confirmed its strategy of replacing
Canadian GAAP with International Financial Reporting Standards (or IFRS) for Canadian publicly
accountable enterprises. IFRS will be effective for our interim and annual financial statements
effective January 1, 2011. We have established a conversion plan and an IFRS project team, and have
commenced our review of the accounting policy differences between Canadian GAAP and IFRS, as well
as policy choices and elections allowed under IFRS, to ensure we adequately address all the key
elements of the conversion. At this time, the impact on our future financial position or results of
operations is not reasonably determinable, as the International Accounting Standard Board will
continue to issue new accounting standards during the period leading up to the changeover date. We
do anticipate a significant increase in disclosure resulting from the adoption of IFRS and are
continuing to assess the level of disclosure required as well as any systems changes that may be
necessary to gather and process the required information.
Disclosure Controls and Procedures
We have established and maintained disclosure controls and procedures in order to provide
reasonable assurance that material information relating to our company is made known to the
appropriate level of management in a timely manner.
Based on current securities legislation in Canada and the United States, our Chief Executive
Officer and Chief Financial Officer are required to certify that they have assessed the
effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures as at December 31, 2008.
We performed an evaluation under the supervision and with the participation of our Chief Executive
Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures
as at December 31, 2008. Based on that evaluation, we concluded that our disclosure controls and
procedures were effective as of that date to provide reasonable assurance that information required
to be disclosed by us in the reports that we file or submit is accumulated and communicated to our
management, including our principal executive and principal financial officers, or persons
performing similar functions, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required
disclosure.
Internal Controls over Financial Reporting
Management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal controls over
financial reporting. Under the supervision and with the participation of management, including our
Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, we conducted an evaluation of the
effectiveness of our internal controls over financial reporting based on the framework in Internal
Control Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway
Commission. Based on our evaluation under the framework in Internal Control Integrated Framework,
management concluded that our internal controls over financial reporting were effective as of
December 31, 2008.
The effectiveness of our internal controls over financial reporting as of December 31, 2008 has
been audited by KPMG LLP, the independent registered public accounting firm that audited our
December 31, 2008 consolidated annual financial statements, as stated in their report which is
included in our consolidated financial statements.
Changes in Internal Controls Over Financial Reporting
There has been no change in our internal control over financial reporting during 2008 that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over
financial reporting.
Forward-Looking Statements
This Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations contains
forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties. These statements are based on
current expectations and estimates about our business, and include, among others, statements
relating to:
44 RITCHIE BROS. AUCTIONEERS | 2008 ANNUAL REPORT
à |
|
our future performance; |
|
à |
|
growth of our operations; |
|
à |
|
growth of the world market for used trucks and equipment; |
|
à |
|
increases in the number of consignors and bidders participating in our auctions; |
|
à |
|
the impact of the current economic environment on our operations and our customers,
including the number of bidders and buyers attending our auctions and consignment
volumes at those auctions; the demand for equipment at our auctions; our bidders ability to
access credit to fund their purchases; the impact of the economic environment on equipment
prices and our business model; |
|
à |
|
our principal operating strengths, our competitive advantages, and the appeal of our
auctions to buyers and sellers of industrial assets; |
|
à |
|
our ability to draw consistently significant numbers of local and international end-user
bidders to our auctions; |
|
à |
|
our long-term mission to be the worlds largest marketplace for commercial and industrial
assets; |
|
à |
|
our people, including our ability to recruit, train, retain and develop the right people to
help us achieve our goals; |
|
à |
|
our places, including our ability to add the capacity necessary to accommodate our growth;
our ability to increase our market share in our core markets and regions and our ability to
expand into complimentary market sectors and new geographic markets, including our
ability to take advantage of growth opportunities in emerging markets; the acquisition and
development of auction facilities and the related impact on our capital expenditures; |
|
à |
|
our processes, including our process improvement initiatives and their effect on our business,
results of operations and capital expenditures, particularly our ability to grow revenues
faster than operating costs; |
|
à |
|
the relative percentage of gross auction proceeds represented by straight commission,
guarantee and inventory contracts; |
|
à |
|
our auction revenue rates, the sustainability of those rates, and the impact of our commission
rate and fee changes implemented in 2008, as well as the seasonality of gross auction
proceeds and auction revenues; |
|
à |
|
the performance of our agricultural division, and the variability on our agricultural sales
from period to period; |
|
à |
|
our direct expense and income tax rates, depreciation expenses and general and administrative
expenses; |
|
à |
|
our future capital expenditures; |
|
à |
|
our internet initiatives and the level of participation in our auctions by internet bidders; |
|
à |
|
the proportion of our revenues and operating costs denominated in currencies other than
the U.S. dollar or the effect of any currency exchange and interest rate fluctuations on our
results of operations; and |
|
à |
|
financing available to us and the sufficiency of our working capital to meet our financial
needs. |
In some cases, you can identify forward-looking statements
by terms such as anticipate, believe, could,
continue, estimate, expect,
intend, may, might, ongoing, plan, potential,
predict, project, should, will, would, or the
negative of these terms, and similar expressions intended
to identify forward-looking statements. Our
forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future
performance and involve risks, uncertainties and
assumptions that are difficult to predict. While we have
not described all potential risks related to our business
and owning our common shares, the important factors listed
under Risk Factors are among those that may affect our
performance and could cause our actual financial and
operational results to differ significantly from our
predictions. Except as required by applicable securities
law and regulations of relevant exchanges, we do not
intend to update publicly any forward-looking statements,
even if our predictions have been affected by new
information, future events or other developments. You
should consider our forward-looking statements in light of
these and other relevant factors.
Risk Factors
Our business is subject to a number of risks and
uncertainties, and our past performance is no guarantee of
our performance in future periods. Some of the more
important risks that we face are outlined below and
holders of our common shares should consider these risks.
The risks and uncertainties described below are not the
only risks and uncertainties we face. Additional risks and
uncertainties not currently known to us or that we
currently deem immaterial also may impair our business
operations. If any of the following risks actually occur,
our business, results of operations and financial
condition would suffer.
We may incur losses as a result of our guarantee and
outright purchase contracts and advances to consignors.
Approximately 75% of our business is conducted on a
straight commission basis. In certain other situations we
will either offer to:
à |
|
guarantee a minimum level of sale proceeds to the consignor, regardless of the ultimate
selling price of the consignment at the auction; or |
|
à |
|
purchase the equipment outright from the consignor for sale in a particular auction. |
The level of guaranteed proceeds or inventory purchase
price is based on appraisals performed on equipment by our
internal personnel. Inaccurate appraisals could result in
guarantees or inventory values that exceed the realizable
auction proceeds. If auction proceeds are less than the
guaranteed amount, our commission will be reduced or, if
sufficiently lower, we will incur a loss. If auction
proceeds are less than the purchase price we paid for
equipment that we take into inventory temporarily, we will
incur a loss. Because all of our auctions are unreserved,
there is no way for us to protect against these types of
losses by bidding on or acquiring any of the items at the
auction. In recent periods, guarantee and inventory
contracts have generally represented approximately 25% of
our annual gross auction proceeds.
Occasionally we advance to consignors a portion of the
estimated auction proceeds prior to the auction. We
generally make these advances only after taking possession
of the assets to be auctioned and upon receipt of a
security interest in the assets to secure the obligation.
If we were unable to auction the assets or if auction
proceeds were less than amounts advanced, we could incur a
loss.
We may incur losses if we are required to make payments to
buyers and lienholders because we are unable to deliver
clear title on the assets sold at our auctions.
In jurisdictions where title registries are commercially
available, we guarantee to our buyers that each item
purchased at our auctions is free of liens and other
encumbrances, up to the purchase price paid at our
auction. If we are unable to deliver clear title, we
provide the buyer with a full refund of the purchase
price. While we exercise considerable effort to
ensure that all liens have been identified and, if
necessary, discharged prior to the auction, we
occasionally do not properly identify or discharge liens
and have had to make payments to the relevant lienholders
or purchasers. We will incur a loss if we are unable to
recover sufficient funds from the consignors to offset
these payments, and aggregate losses from these payments
could be material.
We may have difficulties sustaining and managing our growth.
One of the main elements of our strategy is to continue to
grow our business, primarily by increasing our presence in
markets in which we already operate and by expanding into
new geographic markets and market segments in which we
have not had a significant presence in the past. As part
of this strategy, we may from time to time acquire
additional assets or businesses from third parties. We may
not be successful in growing our business or in managing
this growth. For us to grow our business successfully, we
need to accomplish a number of objectives, including:
à |
|
recruiting and retaining suitable sales and managerial personnel; |
|
à |
|
identifying and developing new geographic markets and market sectors; |
|
à |
|
identifying and acquiring, on terms favourable to us, suitable land on which to build
new auction facilities and, potentially, businesses that might be appropriate acquisition
targets; |
|
à |
|
managing expansion successfully; |
|
à |
|
obtaining necessary financing on terms favourable to us, and securing the availability of
our credit facilities to fund our growth initiatives; |
|
à |
|
receiving necessary authorizations and approvals from governments for proposed development
or expansion; |
|
à |
|
integrating successfully new facilities and any acquired businesses into our existing
operations; |
|
à |
|
achieving acceptance of the auction process in general by potential consignors, bidders
and buyers; |
|
à |
|
establishing and maintaining favourable relationships with consignors, bidders and buyers
in new markets and market sectors, and maintaining these relationships in our existing
markets; |
|
à |
|
succeeding against local and regional competitors in new geographic markets; |
|
à |
|
capitalizing on changes in the supply of and demand for industrial assets, in our existing
and new markets; and |
|
à |
|
designing, developing and implementing business processes and operating systems that
are able to support profitable growth. |
We will likely need to hire additional employees to manage
our growth. In addition, growth may increase the
geographic scope of our operations and increase demands on
both our operating and financial systems. These factors
will increase our operating complexity and the level of
responsibility of existing and new management personnel.
It may be difficult for us to attract
RITCHIE BROS. AUCTIONEERS | 2008 ANNUAL REPORT 45
and retain qualified sales personnel, managers and
employees, and our existing operating and financial
systems and controls may not be adequate to support our
growth. We may not be able to improve our systems and
controls as a result of increased costs, technological
challenges, or lack of qualified employees. Our past
results and growth may not be indicative of our future
prospects or our ability to expand into new markets, many
of which may have different competitive conditions and
demographic characteristics than our existing markets.
In addition, we continue to pursue our strategy of
investing in our people, places and processes to give us
the capacity to handle expected future growth, including
investments in frontier markets that may not generate
profitable growth in the near term. Planning for future
growth requires investments to be made now in anticipation
of growth that may not materialize, and if we are not
successful growing our gross auction proceeds our earnings
may be impacted. A large component of our G&A is
considered fixed costs that we will incur regardless of
gross auction proceeds growth. There can be no assurances
that our gross auction proceeds and auction revenues will
grow at a more rapid rate than our fixed costs, especially
in the event of a deep and prolonged recession, which
would have a negative impact on our margins and earnings
per share.
Disruptions to credit and financial markets, economic
uncertainty and a sustained economic downturn could harm
our operations.
The current global economic and financial market crisis
has caused, among other things, a general tightening in
credit markets, lower levels of liquidity, and increases
in default and bankruptcy rates, all of which may have a
negative impact on our operations, financial condition and
liquidity and ability to grow our business. Our operations
and access to our cash balances are dependent upon the
economic viability of our key suppliers and the various
financial institutions we utilize. Our operations may be
disrupted if we cannot obtain products and services
necessary for our auction operations from our key
suppliers, or if we lose access to our cash balances. In
addition, our auction revenues may decrease if our
consignors choose not to sell their assets as a result of
current economic conditions, or if our buyers are unable
to obtain financing for assets purchases, or if our
customers are in financial distress. In addition, our
lenders may be unable to advance funds to us under
existing credit facilities, which could harm our liquidity
and ability to operate or grow our business. The timing
and nature of any recovery in credit and financial markets
remain uncertain, and there can be no assurance that
market conditions will improve in the near future and that
our results of operations will not be adversely affected.
Decreases in the supply of, demand for, or market values
of industrial assets, primarily used industrial equipment,
could harm our business.
Our auction revenues could be reduced if there was
significant erosion in the supply of, demand for, or
market values of used industrial equipment, which would
affect our financial condition and results of operations.
We have no control over any of the factors that affect the
supply of, and demand for, used industrial equipment, and
the circumstances that cause market values for industrial
equipment to fluctuate including but not limited to
economic uncertainty, disruptions to credit and financial
markets, a sustained economic recession, lower commodity
prices, and our customers restricted access to capital,
are beyond our control. Any increase in the volume of
equipment at our auctions may not be sufficient to offset
declines in the market value for that equipment as a
result of the current economic environment. In addition,
price competition and availability of industrial equipment
directly affect the supply of, demand for, and market
value of used industrial equipment. Climate change
initiatives, including significant changes to engine
emission standards applicable to industrial equipment, may
also impact the supply of, demand for or market values of
industrial equipment.
Damage to our reputation for fairness, integrity and
conducting only unreserved auctions could harm our
business.
Strict adherence to the unreserved auction process is one
of our founding principles and, we believe, one of our
most significant competitive advantages. Closely related
to this is our reputation for fairness and honesty in our
dealings with our customers. Our ability to attract new
customers and continue to do business with existing
customers could be harmed if our reputation for fairness,
integrity and conducting only unreserved auctions was
damaged. If we are unable to maintain our reputation and
police and enforce our policy of conducting unreserved
auctions, we could lose business and our results of
operations would suffer.
Competition in our core markets could result in reductions in our revenues and profitability.
The used truck and equipment sectors of the global
industrial equipment market, and the auction segment of
those markets, are highly fragmented. We compete directly
for potential purchasers of industrial equipment with
other auction companies. Our indirect competitors include
equipment manufacturers, distributors and dealers that
sell new or used equipment, and equipment rental
companies. When sourcing equipment to sell at our
auctions, we compete with other auction companies,
equipment dealers and brokers, and equipment owners that
have traditionally disposed of equipment in private sales.
Our direct competitors are primarily regional auction
companies. Some of our indirect competitors have
significantly greater financial and marketing resources
and name recognition than we do. New competitors with
greater financial and other resources may enter the
industrial equipment auction market in the future.
Additionally, existing or future competitors may succeed
in entering and establishing successful operations in new
geographic markets prior to our entry into those markets.
They may also compete against us through internet-based
services. If existing or future
competitors seek to gain or retain market share by
reducing commission rates, we may also be required to
reduce commission rates, which may reduce our revenue and
harm our operating results and financial condition, or we
may lose market share.
Our substantial international operations expose us to
foreign exchange rate fluctuations and political and
economic instability that could harm our results of
operations.
We conduct business in many countries around the world and
intend to continue to expand our presence in international
markets, including emerging markets. Fluctuating currency
exchange rates, acts of terrorism or war, and changing
social, economic and political conditions and regulations,
including income tax and accounting regulations, and
political interference, may negatively affect our business
in international markets and our related results of
operations. Currency exchange rate fluctuations between
the different countries in which we conduct our operations
impact the purchasing power of buyers, the motivation of
consignors, asset values and asset flows between various
countries, including those in which we do not have
operations. These factors and other global economic
conditions may harm our business and our operating
results.
Although we report our financial results in United States
dollars, a significant portion of our auction revenues is
generated at auctions held outside the United States,
mostly in currencies other than the United States dollar.
Currency exchange rate changes against the United States
dollar, particularly for the Canadian dollar and the Euro,
could affect the presentation of our results in our
financial statements and cause our earnings to fluctuate.
We may incur losses as a result of legal and other claims.
We are subject to legal and other claims that arise in the
ordinary course of our business. While the results of
these claims have not historically had a material effect
on our business, financial condition or results of
operations, we may not be able to defend ourselves
adequately against these claims in the future and we may
incur losses. Aggregate losses from and the legal fees
associated with these claims could be material.
Our operating results are subject to quarterly variations.
Historically, our revenues and operating results have
fluctuated from quarter to quarter. We expect to continue
to experience these fluctuations as a result of the
following factors, among others:
à |
|
the size, timing and frequency of our auctions; |
|
à |
|
the seasonal nature of the auction business in general, with peak activity typically occurring
in the second and fourth calendar quarters, mainly as a result of the seasonal nature of the
construction and natural resources industries; |
|
à |
|
the performance of our underwritten business (guarantee and outright purchase
contracts); |
|
à |
|
general economic conditions in our markets; and |
|
à |
|
the timing of acquisitions and development of auction facilities and related costs. |
In addition, we usually incur substantial costs when
entering new markets, and the profitability of operations
at new locations is uncertain as a result of the increased
variability in the number and size of auctions at new
sites. These and other factors may cause our future
results to fall short of investor expectations or not to
compare favourably to our past results.
We do not currently have a formal business continuity
plan, which exposes our business to risks.
We depend on our information and other systems for the
continuity and effective operation of our business. In the
event of a significant interruption to our business, or
the loss of key systems as a result of a natural or other
disaster, we do not currently have plans in place to
ensure that our business continues to operate in an
effective manner. Although we are in the process of
implementing a formal business continuity plan, our
business, results of operations and financial conditions
could be materially affected in the event of a significant
interruption of our business.
We are in the process of implementing a formal disaster
recovery plan, including a data center co-location plan.
However, these plans are not yet complete. If we were
subject to a disaster, serious security breach or threat
to business continuity, it could materially damage our
business, results of operations and financial condition.
Our internet-related initiatives are subject to
technological obsolescence and potential service
interruptions and may not contribute to improved operating
results over the long-term; in addition, we may not be
able to compete with technologies implemented by our
competitors.
We have invested significant resources in the development
of our internet platform, including our rbauctionBid-Live
internet bidding service. We use and rely on intellectual
property owned by third parties, which we license for use
in providing our rbauctionBid-Live service. Our internet
technologies may not result in any material long-term
improvement in our results of operations or financial
condition and may require further significant investment
to avoid obsolescence. We may also not be able to continue
to adapt our business to internet commerce and we may not
be able to compete effectively against internet auction
services offered by our competitors.
The success of our
rbauctionBid-
Live service and other services that we offer over the
internet, including equipment-searching capabilities and
historical price information, will continue to
46 RITCHIE BROS. AUCTIONEERS | 2008 ANNUAL REPORT
depend largely on the performance and reliability of the
hardware and software we utilize, our ability to use
suitable intellectual property licensed from third
parties, further development and maintenance of our
infrastructure and the internet in general. Our ability to
offer online services depends on the performance of the
internet, as well as some of our internal hardware and
software systems.
Viruses, worms and other similar programs, which have
in the past caused periodic outages and other internet
access delays, may in the future interfere with the
performance of the internet and some of our internal
systems. These outages and delays could reduce the level
of service we are able to offer over the internet. We
could lose customers and our reputation could be harmed if
we were unable to provide services over the internet at an
acceptable level of performance or reliability.
The availability and performance of our internal
technology infrastructure are critical to our business.
The satisfactory performance, reliability and availability
of our web site, enterprise resource planning system,
processing systems and network infrastructure are
important to our reputation and our business. We will need
to continue to expand and upgrade our technology,
transaction processing systems and network infrastructure
both to meet increased usage of our rbauctionBid-Live
service and other services offered on our website and to
implement new features and functions. Our business and
results of operations could be harmed if we were unable to
expand and upgrade in a timely manner our systems and
infrastructure to accommodate any increases in the use of
our internet services, or if we were to lose access to or
the functionality of our internet systems for any reason.
We use both internally developed and licensed systems for
transaction processing and accounting, including billings
and collections processing. We have recently improved
these systems to accommodate growth in our business. If we
are unsuccessful in continuing to upgrade our technology,
transaction processing systems or network infrastructure
to accommodate increased transaction volumes, it could
harm our operations and interfere with our ability to
expand our business.
Our business could be harmed if we lost the services of one or more key personnel.
The growth and performance of our business depends to a
significant extent on the efforts and abilities of our
executive officers and senior managers. Our business could
be harmed if we lost the services of some of these
individuals. We do not maintain key man insurance on the
lives of any of our executive officers. Our future success
largely depends on our ability to attract, develop and
retain skilled employees in all areas of our business, and
to plan effectively for succession.
Our expenses may increase significantly or our operations
and ability to expand may be limited as a result of
environmental and other regulations.
A variety of federal, provincial, state and local laws,
rules and regulations, including local tax and accounting
rules, apply to our business. These relate to, among other
things, the auction business, imports and exports of
equipment, worker safety, privacy of customer information,
and the use, storage, discharge and disposal of
environmentally sensitive materials. Complying with
revisions to laws, rules and regulations could result in
an increase in expenses and a deterioration of our
financial performance. Failure to comply with applicable
laws, rules and regulations could result in substantial
liability to us, suspension or cessation of some or all of
our operations, restrictions on our ability to expand at
present locations or into new locations, requirements for
the acquisition of additional equipment or other
significant expenses or restrictions.
The development or expansion of auction sites depends upon
receipt of required licenses, permits and other
governmental authorizations. Our
inability to obtain these required items could harm our
business. Additionally, changes or concessions required by
regulatory authorities could result in significant delays
in, or prevent completion of, such development or
expansion.
Under some environmental laws, an owner or lessee of, or
other person involved in, real estate may be liable for
the costs of removal or remediation of hazardous or toxic
substances located on or in, or emanating from, the real
estate, and related costs of investigation and property
damage. These laws often impose liability without regard
to whether the owner, lessee or other person knew of, or
was responsible for, the presence of the hazardous or
toxic substances. Environmental contamination may exist at
our owned or leased auction sites, or at other sites on
which we may conduct auctions, or properties that we may
be selling by auction, from prior activities at these
locations or from neighbouring properties. In addition,
auction sites that we acquire or lease in the future may
be contaminated, and future use of or conditions on any of
our properties or sites could result in contamination. The
costs related to claims arising from environmental
contamination of any of these properties could harm our
financial condition and results of operations.
There are restrictions in the United States and Europe
that may affect the ability of equipment owners to
transport certain equipment between specified
jurisdictions. One example of these restrictions is
environmental certification requirements in the United
States, which prevent non-certified equipment from
entering into commerce in the United States. If these
restrictions, or changes to environmental laws, were to
inhibit materially the ability of customers to ship
equipment to or from our auction sites, they could reduce
gross auction proceeds and harm our business.
International bidders and consignors could be deterred
from participating in our auctions if governmental bodies
impose additional export or import regulations or
additional duties, taxes or other charges on exports or
imports. Reduced participation by international bidders
and consignors could reduce gross auction proceeds and
harm our business, financial condition and results of
operations.
Our insurance may be insufficient to cover losses that may
occur as a result of our operations.
We maintain property and general liability insurance. This
insurance may not remain available to us at commercially
reasonable rates, and the amount of our coverage may not
be adequate to cover all liability that we may incur. Our
auctions generally involve the operation of large
equipment close to a large number of people, and despite
our focus on safe work practices, an accident could damage
our facilities or injure auction attendees. Any major
accident could harm our reputation and our business. In
addition, if we were held liable for amounts exceeding the
limits of our insurance coverage or for claims outside the
scope of our coverage, the resulting costs could harm our
results of operations and financial condition.
Our business is subject to risks relating to our ability
to safeguard the security and privacy of our customers
confidential information.
We maintain proprietary databases containing confidential
personal information about our customers and the results
of our auctions, and we must safeguard the security and
privacy of this information. Despite our efforts to
protect this information, we face the risk of inadvertent
disclosure of this sensitive information or an intentional
breach of our security measures.
Security breaches could
damage our reputation and expose us to a risk of loss or
litigation and possible liability. We may be required to
make significant expenditures to protect against security
breaches or to alleviate problems caused by any breaches.
Our insurance policies may not be adequate to reimburse us
for losses caused by security breaches.
We may not continue to pay regular cash dividends.
We declared and paid total quarterly cash dividends of
$0.34 per outstanding common share in 2008. Any decision
to declare and pay dividends in the future will be made at
the discretion of our Board of Directors, after taking
into account our operating results, financial condition,
cash requirements, financing agreement restrictions and
other factors our Board may deem relevant. We may be
unable or may elect not to continue to declare and pay
dividends, even if necessary financial conditions are met
and sufficient cash is available for distribution.
Certain global conditions may affect our ability to conduct successful auctions.
Like most businesses with global operations, we are
subject to the risk of certain global conditions, such as
pandemics or other disease outbreaks, that could restrict
our customers travel patterns. If this situation were to
occur, we may not be able to generate sufficient equipment
consignments to sustain our business or to attract enough
bidders to our auctions to achieve world fair market
values for the items we sell. This could harm our results
of operations and financial condition.
The impact of the adoption of International Financial
Reporting Standards IFRS in 2011 is uncertain.
We, as a publicly accountable Canadian enterprise, are
required by the Canadian Accounting Standards Board to
adopt IFRS beginning January 2011. We have not yet
completely determined the impact of the adoption of IFRS
on our consolidated financial statements, or how our
reported financial results will differ from those reported
under current Canadian GAAP.
RITCHIE BROS. AUCTIONEERS | 2008 ANNUAL REPORT 47
Auditors Report
To the Shareholders of Ritchie Bros. Auctioneers Incorporated
We have audited the consolidated balance sheets of Ritchie
Bros. Auctioneers Incorporated (the Company) as at
December 31, 2008 and 2007 and the consolidated statements
of operations, shareholders equity, comprehensive income
and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year
period ended December 31, 2008. These financial statements
are the responsibility of the Companys management. Our
responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial
statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with Canadian
generally accepted auditing standards. With respect to the
consolidated financial statements for the years ended
December 31, 2008 and 2007, we also conducted our audit in
accordance with the standards of the Public Company
Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those
standards require that we plan and perform an audit to
obtain reasonable assurance whether the financial
statements are free of material misstatement. An audit
includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting
the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements.
An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles
used and significant estimates made by management, as well
as evaluating the overall financial statement
presentation.
In our opinion, these consolidated financial statements
present fairly, in all material respects, the financial
position of the Company as at December 31, 2008 and 2007
and the results of its operations and its cash flows for
each of the years in the three-year period ended December
31, 2008 in accordance with Canadian generally accepted
accounting principles.
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of
the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United
States), the Companys internal control over financial
reporting as of December 31, 2008, based on the criteria
established in Internal ControlIntegrated Framework
issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the
Treadway Commission (COSO), and our report dated February
23, 2009 expressed an unqualified opinion on the
effectiveness of the Companys internal control over
financial reporting.
Chartered Accountants
Vancouver, Canada
February 23, 2009
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
To the Shareholders and Board of Directors of Ritchie Bros. Auctioneers Incorporated
We have audited Ritchie Bros. Auctioneers Incorporated
(the Company)s internal control over financial
reporting as of December 31, 2008, based on the criteria
established in Internal ControlIntegrated Framework
issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the
Treadway Commission (COSO). The Companys management is
responsible for maintaining effective internal control
over financial reporting and for its assessment of the
effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting
included in the section entitled Internal Controls over
Financial Reporting included in Managements Discussion
and Analysis. Our responsibility is to express an opinion
the Companys internal control over financial reporting
based on our audit.
We conducted our audit in accordance
with the standards of the Public Company Accounting
Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require
that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable
assurance about whether effective internal control over
financial reporting was maintained in all material
respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of
internal control over financial reporting, assessing the
risk that a material weakness exists, and testing and
evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of
internal control based on the assessed risk. Our audit
also included performing such other procedures as we
considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that
our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.
A
companys internal control over financial reporting is a
process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding
the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation
of financial statements for external purposes in
accordance with generally accepted accounting principles.
A companys internal control over financial reporting
includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to
the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail,
accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and
dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide
reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as
necessary to permit
preparation of financial statements in accordance with
generally accepted accounting principles, and that
receipts and expenditures of the company are being made
only in accordance with authorizations of management and
directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable
assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of
unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the
companys assets that could have a material effect on the
financial statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over
financial reporting may not prevent or detect
misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of
effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk
that controls may become inadequate because of changes in
conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the
policies or procedures may deteriorate.
In our opinion, the Company maintained, in all material
respects, effective internal control over financial
reporting as of December 31, 2008, based on the criteria
established in Internal ControlIntegrated Framework
issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the
Treadway Commission (COSO).
We also have conducted our audits on the consolidated
financial statements in accordance with Canadian generally
accepted auditing standards. With respect to the years
ended December 31, 2008 and 2007, we also have conducted
our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public
Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Our
report dated February 23, 2009 expressed an unqualified
opinion on those consolidated financial statements.
Chartered Accountants
Vancouver, Canada
February 23, 2009
48 RITCHIE BROS. AUCTIONEERS | 2008 ANNUAL REPORT
Consolidated Statements of Operations
(Expressed in thousands of United States dollars, except share and per share amounts)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years ended December 31, |
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
Auction revenues |
|
$ |
354,818 |
|
|
$ |
311,906 |
|
|
$ |
257,857 |
|
Direct expenses |
|
|
49,750 |
|
|
|
46,481 |
|
|
|
40,457 |
|
|
|
|
|
305,068 |
|
|
|
265,425 |
|
|
|
217,400 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
24,764 |
|
|
|
19,417 |
|
|
|
15,017 |
|
General and administrative |
|
|
164,556 |
|
|
|
144,816 |
|
|
|
117,714 |
|
|
|
|
|
189,320 |
|
|
|
164,233 |
|
|
|
132,731 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings from operations |
|
|
115,748 |
|
|
|
101,192 |
|
|
|
84,669 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other income (expense): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense |
|
|
(859 |
) |
|
|
(1,206 |
) |
|
|
(1,172 |
) |
Interest income |
|
|
4,994 |
|
|
|
7,393 |
|
|
|
6,664 |
|
Foreign exchange gain (loss) |
|
|
11,656 |
|
|
|
2,802 |
|
|
|
(451 |
) |
Gain on disposition of capital assets |
|
|
6,370 |
|
|
|
243 |
|
|
|
1,277 |
|
Other |
|
|
1,375 |
|
|
|
1,471 |
|
|
|
1,079 |
|
|
|
|
|
23,536 |
|
|
|
10,703 |
|
|
|
7,397 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings before income taxes |
|
|
139,284 |
|
|
|
111,895 |
|
|
|
92,066 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income tax expense (recovery) (note 8): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current |
|
|
39,101 |
|
|
|
33,797 |
|
|
|
33,757 |
|
Future |
|
|
(1,217 |
) |
|
|
2,115 |
|
|
|
1,091 |
|
|
|
|
|
37,884 |
|
|
|
35,912 |
|
|
|
34,848 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings |
|
$ |
101,400 |
|
|
$ |
75,983 |
|
|
$ |
57,218 |
|
|
|
Net earnings per share (note 6(e)): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
$ |
0.97 |
|
|
$ |
0.73 |
|
|
$ |
0.55 |
|
Diluted |
|
|
0.96 |
|
|
|
0.72 |
|
|
|
0.55 |
|
|
Weighted average number of shares outstanding |
|
|
104,713,375 |
|
|
|
104,266,113 |
|
|
|
103,639,380 |
|
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
Approved on behalf of the Board:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beverley A. Briscoe
|
|
Peter J. Blake |
|
|
|
Director
|
|
Director and Chief Executive Officer |
RITCHIE BROS. AUCTIONEERS | 2008 ANNUAL REPORT 49
Consolidated Balance Sheets
(Expressed in thousands of United States dollars)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, |
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
107,275 |
|
|
$ |
150,315 |
|
Accounts receivable |
|
|
60,375 |
|
|
|
67,716 |
|
Inventory |
|
|
9,711 |
|
|
|
6,031 |
|
Advances against auction contracts |
|
|
285 |
|
|
|
658 |
|
Prepaid expenses and deposits |
|
|
12,088 |
|
|
|
5,766 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
752 |
|
|
|
|
|
Income taxes receivable |
|
|
2,674 |
|
|
|
5,921 |
|
Future income tax asset (note 8) |
|
|
780 |
|
|
|
778 |
|
|
|
|
|
193,940 |
|
|
|
237,185 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital assets (note 4) |
|
|
453,642 |
|
|
|
390,044 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
1,164 |
|
|
|
2,031 |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
40,233 |
|
|
|
42,612 |
|
Future income tax asset (note 8) |
|
|
509 |
|
|
|
1,015 |
|
|
|
|
$ |
689,488 |
|
|
$ |
672,887 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities and Shareholders Equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Auction proceeds payable |
|
$ |
62,717 |
|
|
$ |
80,698 |
|
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities |
|
|
84,114 |
|
|
|
98,039 |
|
Current portion of long-term debt (note 5) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
241 |
|
|
|
|
|
146,831 |
|
|
|
178,978 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt (note 5) |
|
|
67,411 |
|
|
|
44,844 |
|
Other liabilities |
|
|
60 |
|
|
|
385 |
|
Future income tax liability (note 8) |
|
|
10,024 |
|
|
|
13,564 |
|
|
|
|
|
224,326 |
|
|
|
237,771 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shareholders equity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Share capital (note 6) |
|
|
94,366 |
|
|
|
90,223 |
|
Additional paid-in capital |
|
|
14,355 |
|
|
|
12,471 |
|
Retained earnings |
|
|
357,845 |
|
|
|
292,046 |
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) |
|
|
(1,404 |
) |
|
|
40,376 |
|
|
|
|
|
465,162 |
|
|
|
435,116 |
|
|
|
|
$ |
689,488 |
|
|
$ |
672,887 |
|
|
Commitments and contingencies (note 9)
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
Consolidated Statements of Shareholders Equity
(Expressed in thousands of United States dollars)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional |
|
|
|
|
|
|
other |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
Share |
|
|
paid-in |
|
|
Retained |
|
|
comprehensive |
|
|
shareholders |
|
|
|
capital |
|
|
capital |
|
|
earnings |
|
|
income (loss) |
|
|
equity |
|
|
Balance, December 31, 2005 |
|
$ |
79,844 |
|
|
$ |
8,929 |
|
|
$ |
217,080 |
|
|
$ |
19,330 |
|
|
$ |
325,183 |
|
Exercise of stock options |
|
|
6,066 |
|
|
|
(881 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,185 |
|
Stock compensation tax adjustment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
391 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
391 |
|
Stock compensation expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,020 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,020 |
|
Net earnings |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
57,218 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
57,218 |
|
Cash dividends paid |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(26,949 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(26,949 |
) |
Foreign currency translation adjustment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,589 |
|
|
|
5,589 |
|
|
Balance, December 31, 2006 |
|
|
85,910 |
|
|
|
10,459 |
|
|
|
247,349 |
|
|
|
24,919 |
|
|
|
368,637 |
|
Exercise of stock options |
|
|
4,313 |
|
|
|
(688 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,625 |
|
Stock compensation tax adjustment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
722 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
722 |
|
Stock compensation expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,978 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,978 |
|
Net earnings |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
75,983 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
75,983 |
|
Cash dividends paid |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(31,286 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(31,286 |
) |
Foreign currency translation adjustment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,457 |
|
|
|
15,457 |
|
|
Balance, December 31, 2007 |
|
|
90,223 |
|
|
|
12,471 |
|
|
|
292,046 |
|
|
|
40,376 |
|
|
|
435,116 |
|
Exercise of stock options |
|
|
4,143 |
|
|
|
(625 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,518 |
|
Stock compensation tax adjustment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
198 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
198 |
|
Stock compensation expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,311 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,311 |
|
Net earnings |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
101,400 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
101,400 |
|
Cash dividends paid |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(35,601 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(35,601 |
) |
Foreign currency translation adjustment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(26,896 |
) |
|
|
(26,896 |
) |
Reclassification to net earnings of
foreign currency translation gains |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(14,884 |
) |
|
|
(14,884 |
) |
|
Balance, December 31, 2008 |
|
$ |
94,366 |
|
|
$ |
14,355 |
|
|
$ |
357,845 |
|
|
$ |
(1,404 |
) |
|
$ |
465,162 |
|
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
50 RITCHIE BROS. AUCTIONEERS | 2008 ANNUAL REPORT
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income
(Expressed in thousands of United States dollars)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years ended December 31, |
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
Net earnings |
|
$ |
101,400 |
|
|
$ |
75,983 |
|
|
$ |
57,218 |
|
Other comprehensive income (loss): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign currency translation adjustment |
|
|
(26,896 |
) |
|
|
15,457 |
|
|
|
5,589 |
|
Reclassification to net earnings of
foreign currency translation gains |
|
|
(14,884 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income |
|
$ |
59,620 |
|
|
$ |
91,440 |
|
|
$ |
62,807 |
|
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
(Expressed in thousands of United States dollars)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years ended December 31, |
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
Cash provided by (used in): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings |
|
$ |
101,400 |
|
|
$ |
75,983 |
|
|
$ |
57,218 |
|
Items not involving cash: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
24,764 |
|
|
|
19,417 |
|
|
|
15,017 |
|
Stock compensation expense |
|
|
2,311 |
|
|
|
1,978 |
|
|
|
2,020 |
|
Future income taxes |
|
|
(1,217 |
) |
|
|
2,115 |
|
|
|
1,091 |
|
Foreign exchange loss (gain) |
|
|
(11,656 |
) |
|
|
(2,802 |
) |
|
|
451 |
|
Net gain on disposition of capital assets |
|
|
(6,370 |
) |
|
|
(243 |
) |
|
|
(1,277 |
) |
Changes in non-cash working capital: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable |
|
|
(6,770 |
) |
|
|
(22,198 |
) |
|
|
(14,097 |
) |
Inventory |
|
|
(4,758 |
) |
|
|
244 |
|
|
|
4,663 |
|
Advances against auction contracts |
|
|
100 |
|
|
|
847 |
|
|
|
(1,207 |
) |
Prepaid expenses and deposits |
|
|
(6,987 |
) |
|
|
153 |
|
|
|
(2,353 |
) |
Income taxes receivable |
|
|
3,420 |
|
|
|
1,717 |
|
|
|
(3,601 |
) |
Income taxes payable |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,880 |
) |
|
|
(10,632 |
) |
Auction proceeds payable |
|
|
8,355 |
|
|
|
3,138 |
|
|
|
660 |
|
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities |
|
|
(9,704 |
) |
|
|
26,922 |
|
|
|
19,766 |
|
Other |
|
|
(2,200 |
) |
|
|
(2,122 |
) |
|
|
(2,080 |
) |
|
|
|
|
90,688 |
|
|
|
101,269 |
|
|
|
65,639 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acquisition of business |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(597 |
) |
|
|
(2,300 |
) |
Capital asset additions |
|
|
(145,024 |
) |
|
|
(113,219 |
) |
|
|
(51,239 |
) |
Proceeds on disposition of capital assets |
|
|
33,813 |
|
|
|
8,455 |
|
|
|
5,160 |
|
Decrease (increase) in other assets |
|
|
1,000 |
|
|
|
(364 |
) |
|
|
1,832 |
|
|
|
|
|
(110,211 |
) |
|
|
(105,725 |
) |
|
|
(46,547 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance of share capital |
|
|
3,518 |
|
|
|
3,625 |
|
|
|
5,185 |
|
Dividends on common shares |
|
|
(35,601 |
) |
|
|
(31,286 |
) |
|
|
(26,949 |
) |
Issuance of short-term debt |
|
|
37,077 |
|
|
|
33,415 |
|
|
|
|
|
Repayment of short-term debt |
|
|
(36,459 |
) |
|
|
(33,908 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Issuance of long-term debt |
|
|
25,566 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Repayment of long-term debt |
|
|
(238 |
) |
|
|
(251 |
) |
|
|
(227 |
) |
Other |
|
|
(57 |
) |
|
|
640 |
|
|
|
335 |
|
|
|
|
|
(6,194 |
) |
|
|
(27,765 |
) |
|
|
(21,656 |
) |
|
Effect of changes in foreign currency rates on cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
(17,323 |
) |
|
|
10,515 |
|
|
|
5,336 |
|
|
Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
(43,040 |
) |
|
|
(21,706 |
) |
|
|
2,772 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of year |
|
|
150,315 |
|
|
|
172,021 |
|
|
|
169,249 |
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents, end of year |
|
$ |
107,275 |
|
|
$ |
150,315 |
|
|
$ |
172,021 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental information: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest paid |
|
$ |
3,476 |
|
|
$ |
3,078 |
|
|
$ |
2,186 |
|
Income taxes paid |
|
|
34,629 |
|
|
|
36,089 |
|
|
|
47,924 |
|
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
RITCHIE BROS. AUCTIONEERS | 2008 ANNUAL REPORT 51
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Tabular dollar amounts expressed in thousands of United States dollars, except share and per share amounts)
Years ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006
1. |
|
Significant accounting policies: |
|
(a) |
|
Basis of presentation: |
|
|
|
|
These consolidated financial statements present the financial position, results of
operations and cash flows of Ritchie Bros. Auctioneers Incorporated (the Company), a
company amalgamated in December 1997 under the Canada Business Corporations Act, and its
subsidiaries. All significant intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated. |
|
|
|
|
The consolidated financial statements of the Company have been prepared in accordance with
generally accepted accounting principles in Canada which, except as disclosed in note 13,
also comply, in all material respects, with generally accepted accounting principles in the
United States. |
|
|
(b) |
|
Cash and cash equivalents: |
|
|
|
|
Cash equivalents consist of highly liquid investments having an original term to maturity
of three months or less when acquired. |
|
|
(c) |
|
Inventory: |
|
|
|
|
Inventory is primarily represented by goods held for auction and has been valued at the
lower of cost, determined by the specific identification method, and net realizable value. |
|
|
(d) |
|
Capital assets: |
|
|
|
|
All capital assets are stated at cost and include capitalized interest on property under
development. Depreciation is provided to charge the cost of the assets to operations over
their estimated useful lives based on their usage as follows: |
|
|
|
|
|
Asset |
|
Basis |
|
Rate/term |
|
Improvements
|
|
declining balance
|
|
10% |
Buildings
|
|
straight-line
|
|
30 years |
Computer software
|
|
straight-line
|
|
35 years |
Yard equipment
|
|
declining balance
|
|
2030% |
Automotive equipment
|
|
declining balance
|
|
30% |
Computer equipment
|
|
straight-line
|
|
3 years |
Office equipment
|
|
declining balance
|
|
20% |
Leasehold improvements
|
|
straight-line
|
|
Terms of leases |
|
|
|
Long-lived assets are reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances
indicate that the carrying amount of the asset may not be recoverable. In such situations,
long-lived assets are considered impaired when undiscounted estimated future cash flows
resulting from the use of the asset and its eventual disposition are less than the assets
carrying amount. |
|
|
|
|
Legal obligations to retire tangible long-lived assets and assets under operating leases are
recorded at the fair value in the period in which they are incurred, if a reasonable estimate
of fair value can be made, with a corresponding increase in asset value. The liability is
accreted to face value over the life of the asset. The Company does not have any significant
asset retirement obligations. |
|
|
(e) |
|
Goodwill: |
|
|
|
|
Goodwill represents non-identifiable intangible assets acquired on business combinations.
Goodwill is not amortized and is tested for impairment annually, or more frequently if events
or changes in circumstances indicate that the asset might be impaired. The impairment test
compares the carrying amount of the goodwill against its implied fair value. To the extent that
the carrying amount of goodwill exceeds its fair value, an impairment loss is charged against
earnings. |
|
|
(f) |
|
Revenue recognition: |
|
|
|
|
Auction revenues are comprised mostly of auction commissions, which are earned by the Company
acting as an agent for consignors of equipment and other assets, but also include net profits
on the sale of inventory, internet and proxy purchase fees, administrative and documentation
fees on the sale of certain lots, and auction advertising fees. All revenue is recognized when
the auction sale is complete and the Company has determined that the auction proceeds are
collectible. |
|
|
|
|
Auction commissions represent the percentage earned by the Company on the gross proceeds from
equipment and other assets sold at auction. The majority of auction commissions is earned as a
pre-negotiated fixed rate of the gross selling price. Other commissions are earned when the
Company guarantees a certain level of proceeds to a consignor. This type of commission
typically includes a pre-negotiated percentage of the guaranteed gross proceeds plus a
percentage of proceeds in excess of the guaranteed amount. If actual auction proceeds are less
than the guaranteed amount, commission is reduced; if proceeds are sufficiently lower, the
Company can incur a loss on the sale. Losses, if any, resulting from guarantee contracts are
recorded in the period in which the relevant auction is completed. If a loss relating to a
guarantee contract to be sold after a period end is known at the financial statement reporting
date, the loss is accrued in the financial statements for that period. The Companys exposure
from these guarantee contracts fluctuates over time (see note 9(b)). |
|
|
|
|
Auction revenues also include net profit on the sale of inventory items. In some cases,
incidental to its regular commission business, the Company temporarily acquires title to items
for a short time prior to a particular auction sale. The auction revenue recorded is the net
gain or loss on the sale of the items. |
|
|
(g) |
|
Income taxes: |
|
|
|
|
Income taxes are accounted for using the asset and liability method, whereby future taxes are
recognized for the tax consequences of temporary differences by applying substantively enacted
or enacted statutory tax rates applicable to future years to differences between the financial
statement carrying amounts and the tax bases of existing assets and liabilities. The effect on
future taxes of a change in tax rates is recognized in earnings in the period in which the new
tax rate is substantively enacted. Future tax benefits, such as non-capital loss carry
forwards, are recognized to the extent that realization of such benefits is considered more
likely than not. |
|
|
(h) |
|
Foreign currency translation: |
|
|
|
|
The Companys reporting currency is the United States dollar. The functional currency for each
of the Companys operations is usually the currency of the country of residency; in some cases
it is the United States dollar. Each of the Companys foreign operations is considered to be
self-sustaining. Accordingly, the financial statements of the Companys operations that are not
denominated in United States dollars have been translated into United States dollars using the
exchange rate at the end of each reporting period for asset and liability amounts and the
average exchange rate for each reporting period for amounts included in the determination of
earnings. Any gains or losses from the translation of asset and liability amounts have been
included in accumulated other comprehensive income,
which is included as a separate component of shareholders equity. Monetary assets and
liabilities recorded in foreign currencies are translated into the appropriate functional
currency at the rate of exchange in effect at the balance sheet date. Foreign currency
denominated transactions are translated into the appropriate functional currency at the
exchange rate in effect on the date of the transaction. |
52 RITCHIE BROS. AUCTIONEERS | 2008 ANNUAL REPORT
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Tabular dollar amounts expressed in thousands of United States dollars, except share and per share amounts)
Years ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006
1. |
|
Significant accounting policies (continued): |
|
(i) |
|
Use of estimates: |
|
|
|
|
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting
principles requires the Company to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported
amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at
the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses
during the reporting periods. Significant financial statement items requiring the use of
estimates include the determination of useful lives for depreciation, the valuation of
goodwill and capital assets, the valuation of consignors equipment and other assets
subject to guarantee contracts, and the estimation of the utilization of future income tax
asset balances. Actual results could differ from such estimates and assumptions. |
|
|
(j) |
|
Financial instruments: |
|
|
|
|
The Company classifies its cash and cash equivalents as held-for-trading, which is measured
at fair value with changes in fair value being recognized in net earnings. Accounts
receivable are classified as loans and receivables, which are measured at amortized cost.
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities, auction proceeds payable, and long-term debt are
classified as other financial liabilities, which are measured at amortized cost. |
|
|
|
|
Transaction costs are offset against the outstanding principal of the related debts and are
amortized using the effective interest rate method. |
|
|
|
|
All derivative instruments, including embedded derivatives, are recorded in the financial
statements at fair value unless exempted from derivative treatment as a normal purchase and
sale. All changes in their fair value are recorded in income unless cash flow hedge
accounting is applied, in which case changes in fair value are recorded in other
comprehensive income. |
|
|
(k) |
|
Net earnings per share: |
|
|
|
|
Net earnings per share has been calculated based on the weighted average number of common
shares outstanding. Diluted net earnings per share has been calculated after giving effect
to outstanding dilutive options calculated by the treasury stock method (note 6(e)). |
|
|
(l) |
|
Stock-based compensation: |
|
|
|
|
The Company has a stock-based compensation plan, which is described in note 6(c) and (d).
The Company uses the fair value based method to account for employee stock-based
compensation. Under the fair value based method, compensation cost attributable to options
granted to employees is measured at the fair value of the underlying option at the grant
date using the Black-Scholes option pricing model. Compensation expense is recognized on a
straight-line basis over the vesting period of the underlying option. Any consideration
paid by employees on exercise of stock options or purchase of stock is credited to share
capital. |
|
|
(m) |
|
Comparative figures: |
|
|
|
|
Certain comparative figures have been reclassified to conform with the presentation adopted
in the current year. |
2. |
|
Changes in accounting policies: |
On January 1, 2008, the Company adopted The Canadian Institute of Chartered Accountants
(CICA) Handbook Section 1535, Capital Disclosures, Section 3862, Financial Instruments
Disclosures and Section 3863, Financial Instruments Presentation. Section 1535 requires the
disclosure of both qualitative and quantitative information that enables users of financial
statements to evaluate the entitys objectives, policies and processes for managing capital.
Sections 3862 and 3863 replace Section 3861, Financial Instruments Disclosure and
Presentation, revising and enhancing its disclosure requirements, and carrying forward its
presentation requirements. Disclosure requirements pertaining to sections 1535 and 3862 are
contained in notes 11 and 12, respectively. The adoption of section 3863 had no impact on the
Companys presentation of financial instruments.
3. |
|
Future changes in accounting policies: |
|
(a) |
|
Goodwill and intangible assets: |
|
|
|
|
The CICA issued Section 3064, Goodwill and Intangible Assets, which is effective for the
Company on January 1, 2009. This section establishes new standards for the recognition and
measurement of intangible assets, but does not affect the accounting for goodwill. The
Company is currently evaluating the impact of the adoption of this new standard on its
financial statements and does not expect the effects to be material. |
|
|
(b) |
|
International Financial Reporting Standards: |
|
|
|
|
In February 2008, the Canadian Accounting Standards Board confirmed that International
Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) will replace Canadian generally accepted accounting
principles in 2011 for all publicly accountable Canadian enterprises. The Company will be
required to report its financial results in accordance with IFRS effective January 1, 2011.
The Company is currently assessing the potential impacts of this changeover and developing
its plan accordingly. |
RITCHIE BROS. AUCTIONEERS | 2008 ANNUAL REPORT 53
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Tabular dollar amounts expressed in thousands of United States dollars, except share and per share amounts)
Years ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
Net book |
|
2008 |
|
Cost |
|
|
depreciation |
|
|
value |
|
|
Land and improvements |
|
$ |
173,901 |
|
|
$ |
13,649 |
|
|
$ |
160,252 |
|
Buildings |
|
|
163,044 |
|
|
|
35,153 |
|
|
|
127,891 |
|
Land and buildings under development |
|
|
112,807 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
112,807 |
|
Computer software |
|
|
25,214 |
|
|
|
8,000 |
|
|
|
17,214 |
|
Yard equipment |
|
|
21,831 |
|
|
|
10,424 |
|
|
|
11,407 |
|
Automotive equipment |
|
|
17,811 |
|
|
|
6,868 |
|
|
|
10,943 |
|
Computer equipment |
|
|
11,629 |
|
|
|
5,418 |
|
|
|
6,211 |
|
Office equipment |
|
|
11,138 |
|
|
|
5,519 |
|
|
|
5,619 |
|
Leasehold improvements |
|
|
3,436 |
|
|
|
2,138 |
|
|
|
1,298 |
|
|
|
|
$ |
540,811 |
|
|
$ |
87,169 |
|
|
$ |
453,642 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
Net book |
|
2007 |
|
Cost |
|
|
depreciation |
|
|
value |
|
|
Land and improvements |
|
$ |
161,107 |
|
|
$ |
9,865 |
|
|
$ |
151,242 |
|
Buildings |
|
|
160,795 |
|
|
|
33,247 |
|
|
|
127,548 |
|
Land and buildings under development |
|
|
65,072 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
65,072 |
|
Computer software |
|
|
19,549 |
|
|
|
5,137 |
|
|
|
14,412 |
|
Yard equipment |
|
|
19,270 |
|
|
|
9,387 |
|
|
|
9,883 |
|
Automotive equipment |
|
|
17,727 |
|
|
|
6,591 |
|
|
|
11,136 |
|
Computer equipment |
|
|
8,820 |
|
|
|
5,024 |
|
|
|
3,796 |
|
Office equipment |
|
|
11,549 |
|
|
|
5,922 |
|
|
|
5,627 |
|
Leasehold improvements |
|
|
3,111 |
|
|
|
1,783 |
|
|
|
1,328 |
|
|
|
|
$ |
467,000 |
|
|
$ |
76,956 |
|
|
$ |
390,044 |
|
|
During
the year, interest of $2,431,000 (2007 $1,651,000; 2006 $1,480,000) was capitalized
to the cost of land and buildings under development.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
Term loan, unsecured, bearing interest at 5.61%, due in
quarterly installments of interest only,
with the full amount of the principal due in 2011. |
|
$ |
29,933 |
|
|
$ |
29,904 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revolving loan, denominated in Canadian dollars, unsecured,
bearing interest at bankers acceptance rate
plus a margin between 0.65% and 1.00%, due in monthly
installments of interest only.
The revolving credit facility is available until January 2014. |
|
|
25,220 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Term loan, denominated in Canadian dollars, secured by a
general security agreement, bearing interest at 4.429%,
due in monthly installments of interest only, with the full
amount of the principal due in 2010. |
|
|
12,258 |
|
|
|
14,940 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Term loan, denominated in Australian dollars, secured by
deeds of trust on specific property,
bearing interest between the prime rate and 6.5%, due in
quarterly installments of AUD75, plus interest,
with final payments of AUD275 occurring in 2008. The loan was
repaid in full in 2008. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
241 |
|
|
|
|
|
67,411 |
|
|
|
45,085 |
|
Current portion |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(241 |
) |
|
Non-current portion |
|
$ |
67,411 |
|
|
$ |
44,844 |
|
|
As at December 31, 2008, principal repayments for the remaining period to the contractual maturity
dates are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,327 |
|
2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
30,000 |
|
2012 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2013 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2014 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
25,476 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
67,803 |
|
|
As at December 31, 2008, the Company had available committed revolving credit facilities
aggregating $189,524,000, of which $169,524,000 is available until January 2014. The Company
also had uncommitted credit facilities aggregating $322,792,000, of which $250,000,000 expires
November 2011.
54 RITCHIE BROS. AUCTIONEERS | 2008 ANNUAL REPORT
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Tabular dollar amounts expressed in thousands of United States dollars, except share and per share amounts)
Years ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006
|
(a) |
|
Authorized: |
|
|
|
|
Unlimited number of common shares, without par value. |
|
|
|
|
Unlimited number of senior preferred shares, without
par value, issuable in series. |
|
|
|
|
Unlimited number of
junior preferred shares, without par value, issuable
in series. |
|
|
(b) |
|
Issued: |
|
|
|
|
No preferred shares have been issued. |
|
|
|
|
Common shares issued and outstanding are as follows: |
|
|
|
|
|
Issued and outstanding, December 31, 2005 |
|
|
103,271,700 |
|
Issued for cash, pursuant to stock options exercised |
|
|
747,600 |
|
|
|
Issued and outstanding, December 31, 2006 |
|
|
104,019,300 |
|
Issued for cash, pursuant to stock options exercised |
|
|
419,250 |
|
|
|
Issued and outstanding, December 31, 2007 |
|
|
104,438,550 |
|
Issued for cash, pursuant to stock options exercised |
|
|
449,170 |
|
|
|
Issued and outstanding, December 31, 2008 |
|
|
104,887,720 |
|
|
|
|
|
The Companys common shares were subdivided on a three-for-one basis effective April 24, 2008.
Shareholders of record at the close of business on April 24, 2008 received two additional
common shares for each common share held at that date. The stock split effectively tripled the
number of common shares and stock options outstanding on that date. All share, stock option and
per share information in these consolidated financial statements have been restated to reflect
the stock split on a retroactive basis. |
|
|
(c) |
|
Stock option plan: |
|
|
|
|
The Company has a stock option plan that provides for the award of stock options to selected
employees, directors and officers of the Company and to other persons approved by the Board of
Directors. Stock options are granted at the fair market value of the Companys common shares at
the grant date, with various vesting periods and a term not exceeding 10 years. In 2007, the
Companys stock option plan was amended and restated, and an additional 5,059,404 common shares
were authorized for stock option grants. At December 31, 2008,
there were 6,890,046 (2007
7,338,456) shares authorized and available for grants of options under the stock option plan. |
|
|
|
|
Stock option activity for 2008, 2007 and 2006 is presented below: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common shares |
|
|
Weighted average |
|
|
|
under option |
|
|
exercise price |
|
|
Outstanding, December 31, 2005 |
|
|
2,542,794 |
|
|
$ |
7.30 |
|
Granted |
|
|
617,850 |
|
|
|
14.70 |
|
Exercised |
|
|
(747,600 |
) |
|
|
6.93 |
|
|
Outstanding, December 31, 2006 |
|
|
2,413,044 |
|
|
|
9.31 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Granted |
|
|
489,300 |
|
|
|
18.67 |
|
Exercised |
|
|
(419,250 |
) |
|
|
8.65 |
|
Cancelled |
|
|
(8,700 |
) |
|
|
18.67 |
|
|
Outstanding, December 31, 2007 |
|
|
2,474,394 |
|
|
|
11.24 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Granted |
|
|
460,710 |
|
|
|
24.35 |
|
Exercised |
|
|
(449,170 |
) |
|
|
7.83 |
|
Cancelled |
|
|
(12,300 |
) |
|
|
24.39 |
|
|
Outstanding, December 31, 2008 |
|
|
2,473,634 |
|
|
$ |
14.23 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercisable, December 31, 2008 |
|
|
2,021,324 |
|
|
$ |
12.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
The options outstanding at December 31, 2008 expire on dates ranging to September 3, 2018.
|
RITCHIE BROS. AUCTIONEERS | 2008 ANNUAL REPORT 55
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Tabular dollar amounts expressed in thousands of United States dollars, except share and per share amounts)
Years ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006
6. |
|
Share capital (continued): |
|
(c) |
|
Stock option plan (continued): |
|
|
|
|
The following is a summary of stock options outstanding and exercisable at December 31,
2008: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options Outstanding |
|
|
Options Exercisable |
|
Range of |
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average |
|
|
Weighted average |
|
|
Number |
|
|
Weighted average |
|
exercise prices |
|
Number outstanding |
|
|
remaining life (years) |
|
|
exercise price |
|
|
exercisable |
|
|
exercise price |
|
|
$ 3.89 $ 4.35 |
|
|
200,100 |
|
|
|
2.6 |
|
|
$ |
4.13 |
|
|
|
200,100 |
|
|
$ |
4.13 |
|
$ 4.44 $ 5.18 |
|
|
228,324 |
|
|
|
3.8 |
|
|
|
5.11 |
|
|
|
228,324 |
|
|
|
5.11 |
|
$ 8.82 $10.80 |
|
|
615,000 |
|
|
|
5.6 |
|
|
|
9.92 |
|
|
|
615,000 |
|
|
|
9.92 |
|
$14.23 $14.70 |
|
|
532,100 |
|
|
|
7.0 |
|
|
|
14.67 |
|
|
|
523,100 |
|
|
|
14.67 |
|
$18.67 |
|
|
454,800 |
|
|
|
8.2 |
|
|
|
18.67 |
|
|
|
454,800 |
|
|
|
18.67 |
|
$24.39 $25.76 |
|
|
443,310 |
|
|
|
9.2 |
|
|
|
24.41 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,473,634 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,021,324 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(d) |
|
Stock-based compensation: |
|
|
|
|
During 2008, the Company recognized compensation cost of
$2,311,000 (2007 $1,978,000; 2006
$2,020,000) in respect of options granted under its stock option plan. This amount was
calculated in accordance with the fair value method of accounting. |
|
|
|
|
The fair value of the stock option grants was estimated on the date of the grant using the
Black-Scholes option pricing model with the following assumptions: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
Risk free interest rate |
|
|
2.7 |
% |
|
|
4.5 |
% |
|
|
4.3 |
% |
Expected dividend yield |
|
|
1.31 |
% |
|
|
1.50 |
% |
|
|
1.63 |
% |
Expected lives of options |
|
5 years |
|
5 years |
|
5 years |
Expected volatility |
|
|
23.0 |
% |
|
|
21.8 |
% |
|
|
21.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
The weighted average grant date fair value of options granted during the year ended December
31, 2008 was $5.29 per option (2007 $4.43; 2006 $3.28). The fair value method requires that
this amount be amortized over the relevant vesting periods of the underlying options. |
|
|
(e) |
|
Net earnings per share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended December 31, 2008 |
|
Net earnings |
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Per share amount |
|
|
Basic net earnings per share |
|
$ |
101,400 |
|
|
|
104,713,375 |
|
|
$ |
0.97 |
|
Effect of dilutive securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock options |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,060,569 |
|
|
|
(0.01 |
) |
|
Diluted net earnings per share |
|
$ |
101,400 |
|
|
|
105,773,944 |
|
|
$ |
0.96 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended December 31, 2007 |
|
Net earnings |
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Per share amount |
|
|
Basic net earnings per share |
|
$ |
75,983 |
|
|
|
104,266,113 |
|
|
$ |
0.73 |
|
Effect of dilutive securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock options |
|
|
|
|
|
|
996,183 |
|
|
|
(0.01 |
) |
|
Diluted net earnings per share |
|
$ |
75,983 |
|
|
|
105,262,296 |
|
|
$ |
0.72 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended December 31, 2006 |
|
Net earnings |
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Per share amount |
|
|
Basic net earnings per share |
|
$ |
57,218 |
|
|
|
103,639,380 |
|
|
$ |
0.55 |
|
Effect of dilutive securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock options |
|
|
|
|
|
|
916,620 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted net earnings per share |
|
$ |
57,218 |
|
|
|
104,556,000 |
|
|
$ |
0.55 |
|
|
|
|
|
For the year ended December 31, 2008, stock options to purchase 443,310 common shares were
outstanding but were excluded from the calculation of diluted earnings per share as they were
anti-dilutive.
|
56 RITCHIE BROS. AUCTIONEERS | 2008 ANNUAL REPORT
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Tabular dollar amounts expressed in thousands of United States dollars, except share and per share amounts)
Years ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006
7. |
|
Segmented information: |
|
|
|
The Companys principal business activity is the sale of consignment and self-owned equipment
and other assets at auctions. This business represents a single reportable segment. The Company
determines its activities by geographic segment based on the location of its auctions.
Summarized information by geographic segment is as follows: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
United States |
|
|
Canada |
|
|
Europe |
|
|
Other |
|
|
Combined |
|
|
Year ended December 31, 2008: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Auction revenues |
|
$ |
191,459 |
|
|
$ |
75,683 |
|
|
$ |
54,635 |
|
|
$ |
33,041 |
|
|
$ |
354,818 |
|
Capital assets and goodwill |
|
|
280,417 |
|
|
|
112,799 |
|
|
|
58,167 |
|
|
|
42,492 |
|
|
|
493,875 |
|
Year ended December 31, 2007: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Auction revenues |
|
$ |
173,983 |
|
|
$ |
71,271 |
|
|
$ |
38,771 |
|
|
$ |
27,881 |
|
|
$ |
311,906 |
|
Capital assets and goodwill |
|
|
244,528 |
|
|
|
118,493 |
|
|
|
53,405 |
|
|
|
16,230 |
|
|
|
432,656 |
|
Year ended December 31, 2006: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Auction revenues |
|
$ |
155,558 |
|
|
$ |
54,306 |
|
|
$ |
28,505 |
|
|
$ |
19,488 |
|
|
$ |
257,857 |
|
Capital assets and goodwill |
|
|
199,659 |
|
|
|
86,852 |
|
|
|
25,989 |
|
|
|
12,128 |
|
|
|
324,628 |
|
|
8. |
|
Income taxes: |
|
|
|
Income tax expense differs from that determined by applying the United States statutory tax
rates to the Companys results of operations as follows: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
|
Statutory federal and state tax rate in the United States |
|
|
38.5 |
% |
|
|
40 |
% |
|
|
40 |
% |
|
Expected income tax expense |
|
$ |
53,624 |
|
|
$ |
44,758 |
|
|
$ |
36,826 |
|
Differences: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings taxed in foreign jurisdictions |
|
|
(12,846 |
) |
|
|
(10,199 |
) |
|
|
(3,912 |
) |
Settlement of intercompany loan |
|
|
(3,612 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-deductible expenses |
|
|
1,793 |
|
|
|
1,368 |
|
|
|
1,898 |
|
Foreign exchange gains and losses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(657 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Change in valuation allowance |
|
|
756 |
|
|
|
1,009 |
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
(1,831 |
) |
|
|
(367 |
) |
|
|
36 |
|
|
Actual income tax expense |
|
$ |
37,884 |
|
|
$ |
35,912 |
|
|
$ |
34,848 |
|
|
|
|
Temporary differences that give rise to future income taxes are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
Future income tax asset: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Working capital |
|
$ |
793 |
|
|
$ |
778 |
|
Capital assets |
|
|
360 |
|
|
|
173 |
|
Stock-based compensation |
|
|
1,061 |
|
|
|
775 |
|
Unused tax losses |
|
|
3,991 |
|
|
|
2,380 |
|
Other |
|
|
1,749 |
|
|
|
298 |
|
|
|
|
|
7,954 |
|
|
|
4,404 |
|
Valuation allowance |
|
|
(1,933 |
) |
|
|
(1,177 |
) |
|
Total future income tax asset |
|
|
6,021 |
|
|
|
3,227 |
|
Current future income tax asset |
|
|
793 |
|
|
|
778 |
|
|
Non-current future income tax asset |
|
|
5,228 |
|
|
|
2,449 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Future income tax liability: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital assets |
|
|
(2,933 |
) |
|
|
(4,422 |
) |
Goodwill |
|
|
(7,089 |
) |
|
|
(6,354 |
) |
Other |
|
|
(4,734 |
) |
|
|
(4,222 |
) |
|
Total future income tax liability |
|
|
(14,756 |
) |
|
|
(14,998 |
) |
Current future income tax liability |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-current future income tax liability |
|
|
(14,756 |
) |
|
|
(14,998 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net future income taxes |
|
$ |
(8,735 |
) |
|
$ |
(11,771 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Presented on balance sheet as: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Future income tax asset current |
|
$ |
780 |
|
|
$ |
778 |
|
Future income tax asset non-current |
|
|
509 |
|
|
|
1,015 |
|
Future income tax liability non-current |
|
|
(10,024 |
) |
|
|
(13,564 |
) |
|
|
|
$ |
(8,735 |
) |
|
$ |
(11,771 |
) |
|
|
|
As at December 31, 2008, the Company has net operating and capital loss carryforwards of
approximately $19,927,000 available to reduce future taxable income, of which $3,918,000 expire
through 2028, and $16,009,000 remain indefinitely. The Company has recorded a valuation allowance
of $8,764,000 against these losses. |
RITCHIE BROS. AUCTIONEERS | 2008 ANNUAL REPORT 57
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Tabular dollar amounts expressed in thousands of United States dollars, except share and per share amounts)
Years ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006
9. |
|
Commitments and contingencies: |
|
(a) |
|
Operating leases: |
|
|
|
|
The Company is party to certain operating leases relating to auction sites and offices
located in Canada, the United States, Mexico, Italy, Spain, the Netherlands, the United
Arab Emirates, Australia, Singapore, India, Japan and China. |
|
|
|
|
In 2008, the Company entered into a sale-leaseback arrangement for its new headquarters
building under construction and committed to a long-term lease of the property with the
purchaser upon construction completion. |
|
|
|
|
The future minimum lease payments as at December 31, 2008 are approximately as follows: |
|
|
|
|
|
2009 |
|
$ |
4,967 |
|
2010 |
|
|
7,110 |
|
2011 |
|
|
6,743 |
|
2012 |
|
|
5,410 |
|
2013 |
|
|
4,716 |
|
Thereafter |
|
|
85,964 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total rent expenses in respect of these leases for the year ended December 31, 2008 was
$3,449,000 (2007 $2,131,000; 2006 $1,796,000). |
|
|
(b) |
|
Contingencies: |
|
|
|
|
The Company is subject to legal and other claims that arise in the ordinary course of its
business. The Company does not believe that the results of these claims will have a
material effect on the Companys financial position or results of operations. |
|
|
|
|
In the normal course of its business, the Company will in certain situations guarantee to a
consignor a minimum level of proceeds in connection with the sale at auction of that
consignors equipment. At December 31, 2008, outstanding guarantees under contract for
industrial equipment to be sold prior to the end of the first quarter of 2009 totaled
$5,829,000 (December 31, 2007 $29,134,000 sold prior to the end of the second quarter of
2008). The Company also had guarantees under contract totaling $12,094,000 relating to
agricultural auctions to be held prior to the end of the second quarter of 2009 (December
31, 2007 $26,559,000 sold prior to the end of the second quarter of 2008). The
outstanding guarantee amounts are undiscounted and before estimated proceeds from sale at
auction. No liability has been recorded with respect to these contracts. |
10. |
|
Transactions with related parties: |
|
|
|
The Company did not enter into any related party transactions in 2008 and 2007. During the year
ended December 31, 2006, the Company paid $727,000 to a company controlled by the former
Chairman of the Companys Board of Directors. The costs were incurred pursuant to agreements,
approved by the Companys Board of Directors, by which the related company agrees to provide
meeting rooms, accommodations, meals and recreational activities at its facilities on Stuart
Island in British Columbia, Canada, for certain of the Companys customers and guests. The
agreements set forth the fees and costs per excursion, which are based on market prices for
similar types of facilities and excursions. The Company has entered into similar agreements in
the past. With the former Chairmans retirement effective November 30, 2006, the company
controlled by the former Chairman is no longer considered to be a related party. |
|
11. |
|
Capital risk management: |
|
|
|
The Companys objectives when managing its capital are to maintain a financial position
suitable for providing financial capacity and flexibility to meet its growth strategies, to
provide an adequate return to shareholders, and to return excess cash through the payment of
dividends. The Companys invested capital is defined as the sum of shareholders equity and
long-term debt. |
|
|
|
The Company is not subject to any statutory capital requirements, and has not made any changes
with respect to its overall capital management strategy during the year ended December 31,
2008. |
12. |
|
Financial Instruments: |
|
|
|
(a) Fair value: |
|
|
|
Carrying amounts of certain of the Companys financial instruments, including accounts
receivable, auction proceeds payable, and accounts payable and accrued liabilities
approximate their fair values due to their short terms to maturity. Based on borrowing
rates currently available to the Company for loans with similar terms, the fair value of
its long-term loans as at December 31, 2008 was approximately $69,756,000 (2007
$45,676,000). |
|
|
|
(b) Financial risk management: |
|
|
|
The Company is exposed to a variety of financial risks by virtue of its activities,
including foreign exchange risk, interest rate risk, credit risk and liquidity risk. The
Board of Directors has overall responsibility for the oversight of the Companys risk
management. |
|
|
|
Foreign exchange risk |
|
|
|
The Company operates internationally and is exposed to currency risk, primarily relating to
the Canadian and U.S. dollars, and the Euro, arising from sales, purchases and loans that
are denominated in currencies other than the respective functional currencies of the
Companys international operations. The Company also has various investments in non-U.S.
dollar self-sustaining operations, whose net assets are exposed to foreign currency
translation risk. The Company has elected not to actively manage this exposure at this
time. Refer to further discussion in the section entitled Quantitative and Qualitative
Disclosure about Market Risk contained in the Companys Management Discussion and Analysis. |
|
|
|
For the year ended December 31, 2008, with other variables unchanged, a 1% strengthening
(weakening) of the U.S. dollar against the Canadian dollar and Euro would impact the
Companys financial statements as follows: |
à |
|
decrease (increase) net earnings by approximately $600,000 due to the translation of
the foreign operations statements of operations into the Companys reporting currency,
the U.S. dollar;
|
|
à |
|
decrease (increase) net earnings by approximately $150,000 due to the
revaluation of significant foreign currency denominated monetary items; and
|
|
à |
|
decrease
(increase) other comprehensive income by approximately $1,900,000.
|
58 RITCHIE BROS. AUCTIONEERS | 2008 ANNUAL REPORT
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Tabular dollar amounts expressed in thousands of United States dollars, except share and per share amounts)
Years ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006
12. |
|
Financial Instruments (continued): |
|
(b) |
|
Financial risk management
(continued): Interest rate risk |
|
|
|
|
Our interest rate risk mainly arises from the interest rate impact on the Companys cash
and cash equivalents and floating rate debt. The Companys interest rate management policy
is generally to borrow at fixed rates. However, floating rate funding may be used if the
terms of borrowings are favorable. The Company will consider utilizing derivative
instruments such as interest rate swaps to minimize its exposure to interest rate risk.
Cash and cash equivalents earn interest based on market interest rates. As at December 31,
2008, the Company is not exposed to significant interest rate risk. |
|
|
|
|
Credit risk |
|
|
|
|
Credit risk is the risk of financial loss to the Company if a customer fails to meet its
contractual obligations. The Company is not exposed to significant credit risk because it
does not extend credit to buyers at its auctions, and it has a large diversified customer
base. In addition, assets purchased at the Companys auctions are not normally released to
the buyers until they are paid in full. The Companys maximum exposure to credit risk at
the reporting date is the carrying value of its receivables, less receivables relating to
assets that have not been released to the buyers. |
|
|
|
|
The Companys credit risk exposure on liquid financial assets is limited since it maintains
its cash and cash equivalents in a broad range of large financial institutions around the
world. |
|
|
|
|
Liquidity risk |
|
|
|
|
Liquidity risk is the risk that the Company will not be able to meet its financial
obligations as they fall due. The Company manages its liquidity risk by maintaining
adequate cash and cash equivalent balances, generally by releasing payments to consignors
only after receivables from buyers have been collected. The Company also utilizes its
established committed lines of credit (note 5) for short-term borrowings on an as-needed
basis. The Company continuously monitors and reviews both actual and forecast cash flows to
ensure there is sufficient working capital to satisfy its operating requirements. |
13. |
|
United States generally accepted accounting principles: |
|
|
|
The consolidated financial statements are prepared in accordance with generally accepted
accounting principles (GAAP) in Canada which differ, in certain respects, from accounting
practices generally accepted in the United States and from requirements promulgated by the
Securities and Exchange Commission. |
|
|
|
The amounts in the consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income that differ
from those reported under Canadian GAAP are as follows: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
Net earnings under Canadian GAAP |
|
$ |
101,400 |
|
|
$ |
75,983 |
|
|
$ |
57,218 |
|
Cumulative translation adjustment on settlement
of intercompany loans(a) |
|
|
(14,884 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings under US GAAP |
|
$ |
86,516 |
|
|
$ |
75,983 |
|
|
$ |
57,218 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other comprehensive income (loss) under Canadian
GAAP |
|
|
(41,780 |
) |
|
|
15,457 |
|
|
|
5,589 |
|
Cumulative translation adjustment(a) |
|
|
14,884 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other comprehensive income (loss) under US GAAP |
|
$ |
(26,896 |
) |
|
$ |
15,457 |
|
|
$ |
5,589 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income under US GAAP |
|
$ |
59,620 |
|
|
$ |
91,440 |
|
|
$ |
62,807 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings per share in accordance with US GAAP: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
$ |
0.83 |
|
|
$ |
0.73 |
|
|
$ |
0.55 |
|
Diluted |
|
$ |
0.82 |
|
|
$ |
0.72 |
|
|
$ |
0.55 |
|
|
The amounts in the consolidated balance sheets that differ from those reported under Canadian GAAP
are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
Canadian GAAP |
|
|
US GAAP |
|
|
Canadian GAAP |
|
|
US GAAP |
|
|
Capital assets(b) |
|
$ |
453,642 |
|
|
$ |
474,720 |
|
|
$ |
390,044 |
|
|
$ |
390,044 |
|
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities(b) |
|
|
84,114 |
|
|
|
105,192 |
|
|
|
98,039 |
|
|
|
98,039 |
|
Retained earnings(a) |
|
$ |
357,845 |
|
|
$ |
342,961 |
|
|
$ |
292,046 |
|
|
$ |
292,046 |
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)(a) |
|
|
(1,404 |
) |
|
|
13,480 |
|
|
|
40,376 |
|
|
|
40,376 |
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
The Company had a number of outstanding intercompany loan balances where settlement was not
planned or anticipated in the foreseeable future, which were considered part of net investments in
foreign operations. As such, foreign exchange gains or losses arising from these intercompany loans
were reported in the cumulative translation adjustment account. In 2008, a number of the
intercompany loans were settled or planned to be settled, which resulted in the reclassification to
net earnings of foreign currency translation gains of $14,884,000, net of tax of $139,000. Under US
GAAP, the reclassification of the pro rata portion of foreign exchange gains or losses in
accumulated other comprehensive income to net earnings only occurs when the reduction in the net
investment is the result of a complete sale, or complete or substantially complete liquidation,
which has not occurred in this case. |
|
(b) |
|
The Company sold its new headquarters building under construction and will lease the property
from the purchaser upon construction completion. Under US GAAP, the Company is required to record
an asset under construction as prescribed by the Emerging Issue Task Force (EITF) 97-10, The
Effect of Lessee Involvement in Asset Construction, as the Company is deemed the owner of the
construction project during the construction period. Reimbursements from the lessor to the Company
during the construction period are recorded as accounts payable and accrued liabilities, as
construction is expected to be completed within one year. Upon the completion of construction, a
sale-leaseback
transaction will occur and the Company will lease the headquarters facility from the lessor.
Amounts recorded under asset under construction and accounts payable and accrued liabilities will
be derecognized upon completion of construction. |
RITCHIE BROS. AUCTIONEERS | 2008 ANNUAL REPORT 59
SUPPLEMENTAL QUARTERLY DATA
(Unaudited; tabular dollar amounts expressed in thousands of United States dollars, except per share data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross |
|
|
Auction |
|
|
Net |
|
|
Net Earnings Per Share(7) |
|
|
Closing |
|
2008 |
|
Auction Proceeds |
|
|
Revenues |
|
|
Earnings |
|
|
Basic |
|
|
Diluted |
|
|
Stock Price(7) |
|
|
1st quarter |
|
$ |
781,969 |
|
|
$ |
81,394 |
|
|
$ |
16,407 |
(2) |
|
$ |
0.16 |
(2) |
|
$ |
0.16 |
(2) |
|
$ |
27.37 |
|
2nd quarter |
|
|
1,163,546 |
|
|
|
115,822 |
|
|
|
45,919 |
(2) |
|
|
0.44 |
(2) |
|
|
0.43 |
(2) |
|
|
27.13 |
|
3rd quarter |
|
|
767,718 |
|
|
|
75,909 |
|
|
|
11,934 |
(2) |
|
|
0.11 |
(2) |
|
|
0.11 |
(2) |
|
|
23.36 |
|
4th quarter |
|
|
853,927 |
|
|
|
81,693 |
|
|
|
27,140 |
(2) |
|
|
0.26 |
(2) |
|
|
0.26 |
(2) |
|
|
21.42 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
3,567,160 |
|
|
$ |
354,818 |
|
|
$ |
101,400 |
(2) |
|
$ |
0.97 |
(2) |
|
$ |
0.96 |
(2) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross |
|
|
Auction |
|
|
Net |
|
|
Net Earnings Per Share(7) |
|
|
Closing |
|
2007 |
|
Auction Proceeds |
|
|
Revenues(1) |
|
|
Earnings |
|
|
Basic |
|
|
Diluted |
|
|
Stock Price(7) |
|
|
1st quarter |
|
$ |
700,368 |
|
|
$ |
68,549 |
|
|
$ |
17,559 |
(3) |
|
$ |
0.17 |
(3) |
|
$ |
0.17 |
(3) |
|
$ |
19.51 |
|
2nd quarter |
|
|
945,256 |
|
|
|
94,054 |
|
|
|
26,555 |
(3) |
|
|
0.25 |
(3) |
|
|
0.25 |
(3) |
|
|
20.87 |
|
3rd quarter |
|
|
667,553 |
|
|
|
67,174 |
|
|
|
14,903 |
(3) |
|
|
0.14 |
(3) |
|
|
0.14 |
(3) |
|
|
21.70 |
|
4th quarter |
|
|
873,306 |
|
|
|
82,129 |
|
|
|
16,966 |
(3) |
|
|
0.16 |
(3) |
|
|
0.16 |
(3) |
|
|
27.57 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
3,186,483 |
|
|
$ |
311,906 |
|
|
$ |
75,983 |
(3) |
|
$ |
0.73 |
(3) |
|
$ |
0.72 |
(3) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross |
|
|
Auction |
|
|
Net |
|
|
Net Earnings Per Share(7) |
|
|
Closing |
|
2006 |
|
Auction Proceeds |
|
|
Revenues(1) |
|
|
Earnings |
|
|
Basic |
|
|
Diluted |
|
|
Stock Price(7) |
|
|
1st quarter |
|
$ |
571,528 |
|
|
$ |
55,920 |
|
|
$ |
13,198 |
(4) |
|
$ |
0.13 |
(4) |
|
$ |
0.13 |
(4) |
|
$ |
16.50 |
|
2nd quarter |
|
|
830,493 |
|
|
|
78,126 |
|
|
|
24,526 |
(4) |
|
|
0.24 |
(4) |
|
|
0.23 |
(4) |
|
|
17.73 |
|
3rd quarter |
|
|
580,271 |
|
|
|
54,526 |
|
|
|
9,704 |
(4) |
|
|
0.09 |
(4) |
|
|
0.09 |
(4) |
|
|
17.87 |
|
4th quarter |
|
|
738,731 |
|
|
|
69,285 |
|
|
|
9,790 |
(4) |
|
|
0.09 |
(4) |
|
|
0.09 |
(4) |
|
|
17.85 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
2,721,023 |
|
|
$ |
257,857 |
|
|
$ |
57,218 |
(4) |
|
$ |
0.55 |
(4) |
|
$ |
0.55 |
(4) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross |
|
|
Auction |
|
|
Net |
|
|
Net Earnings Per Share(7) |
|
|
Closing |
|
2005 |
|
Auction Proceeds |
|
|
Revenues(1) |
|
|
Earnings |
|
|
Basic |
|
|
Diluted |
|
|
Stock Price(7) |
|
|
1st quarter |
|
$ |
456,260 |
|
|
$ |
48,494 |
|
|
$ |
13,675 |
(5) |
|
$ |
0.13 |
(5) |
|
$ |
0.13 |
(5) |
|
$ |
10.53 |
|
2nd quarter |
|
|
682,711 |
|
|
|
65,738 |
|
|
|
21,134 |
(5) |
|
|
0.21 |
(5) |
|
|
0.20 |
(5) |
|
|
12.85 |
|
3rd quarter |
|
|
364,005 |
|
|
|
37,900 |
|
|
|
4,568 |
|
|
|
0.04 |
|
|
|
0.04 |
|
|
|
14.66 |
|
4th quarter |
|
|
589,865 |
|
|
|
59,430 |
|
|
|
14,203 |
|
|
|
0.14 |
|
|
|
0.14 |
|
|
|
14.08 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
2,092,841 |
|
|
$ |
211,562 |
|
|
$ |
53,580 |
(5) |
|
$ |
0.52 |
(5) |
|
$ |
0.51 |
(5) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross |
|
|
Auction |
|
|
Net |
|
|
Net Earnings Per Share(7) |
|
|
Closing |
|
2004 |
|
Auction Proceeds |
|
|
Revenues(1) |
|
|
Earnings |
|
|
Basic |
|
|
Diluted |
|
|
Stock Price(7) |
|
|
1st quarter |
|
$ |
378,642 |
|
|
$ |
37,722 |
|
|
$ |
6,590 |
|
|
$ |
0.06 |
|
|
$ |
0.06 |
|
|
$ |
9.37 |
|
2nd quarter |
|
|
553,776 |
|
|
|
56,168 |
|
|
|
15,164 |
|
|
|
0.15 |
|
|
|
0.15 |
|
|
|
9.70 |
|
3rd quarter |
|
|
307,188 |
|
|
|
31,628 |
|
|
|
1,810 |
(6) |
|
|
0.02 |
(6) |
|
|
0.02 |
(6) |
|
|
10.22 |
|
4th quarter |
|
|
549,796 |
|
|
|
56,876 |
|
|
|
11,335 |
(6) |
|
|
0.11 |
(6) |
|
|
0.11 |
(6) |
|
|
11.02 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1,789,402 |
|
|
$ |
182,394 |
|
|
$ |
34,899 |
(6) |
|
$ |
0.34 |
(6) |
|
$ |
0.34 |
(6) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Figures have been reclassified to conform with presentation adopted in 2008. |
|
(2) |
|
Net earnings in the first, second, third and fourth
quarters of 2008 included the foreign exchange impact of
the U.S. dollar denominated bank debt held by a Canadian
subsidiary. The foreign exchange impact of this bank debt
in the first, second, third and fourth quarters of 2008
was a $1.0 million ($0.8 million after tax) loss, $0.2
million ($0.2 million after tax) gain, $1.3 million
($ 1.1 million after tax) loss, and $3.8 million ($3.2 million after tax) loss,
respectively. |
|
|
|
In addition, net earnings in the first, second and
fourth quarters of 2008 included the reclassification of
foreign currency translation gains relating to the
settlement of foreign currency denominated intercompany
loans. The foreign exchange impact of this
reclassification in the first, second and fourth quarters
of 2008 was $2.1 million ($2.0 million after tax), $0.7
million ($0.5 million after tax) and $12.3 million ($11.1
million after tax), respectively. |
|
|
|
Finally, net earnings in the second quarter of 2008
included a gain of $8.3 million ($7.3 million after tax)
recorded on the sale of excess property. |
|
|
|
Excluding the impact of all items above, net earnings
for the first, second, third and fourth quarters of 2008
would have been $15.3 million ($0.15 per basic share and
$0.14 per diluted share), $37.9 million ($0.36 per share,
basic and diluted), $13.0 million ($0.12 per share, basic
and diluted) and $19.2 million ($0.18 per share, basic and
diluted), respectively. Net earnings for the full year
2008 would have been $85.5 million ($0.82 per basic share
and $0.81 per diluted share). |
|
(3) |
|
Net earnings in 2007 included the foreign exchange
impact of the U.S. dollar denominated bank debt held by a
Canadian subsidiary. The foreign exchange impact of this
bank debt in the first, second, third and fourth quarters
of 2007 was a gain of $0.3 million ($0.3 million after
tax), $2.4 million ($2.1 million after tax), $2.0 million
($1.7 million after tax) and less than $0.1 million (less
than $0.1 million after tax), respectively. Excluding the
impact of these items, net earnings for the first, second,
third and fourth quarters of 2007 would have been $17.3
million ($0.17 per basic share and $0.16 per diluted
share), $24.5 million ($0.23 per share, basic and
diluted), $13.2 million ($0.13 per basic share and $0.12
per diluted share) and $16.9 million ($0.16 per share,
basic and diluted), respectively. Net earnings for the
full year 2007 would have been $71.9 million
($ 0.69 per basic share and $0.68 per diluted share). |
|
(4) |
|
Net earnings in 2006 included the foreign exchange
impact of the U.S. dollar denominated bank debt held by a
Canadian subsidiary. The foreign exchange impact of this
bank debt in the first, second, third and fourth quarters
of 2006 was a $0.1 million ($0.1 million after tax) loss,
$1.4 million ($1.2 million after tax) gain, less than $0.1
million (less than $0.1 million after tax) loss, and $1.3
million ($1.1 million after tax) loss, respectively. |
|
|
|
In addition, net earnings in the second and fourth quarters of 2006 included a gain of $1.8
million
($ 1.1 million after tax) recorded on the sale of excess property and a write-down of $0.2 million
($ 0.1 million after tax) on land held for resale, respectively. |
|
|
|
Excluding the impact of all items above, net earnings
for the first, second, third and fourth quarters of 2006
would have been $13.3 million ($0.13 per share, basic and
diluted), $22.2 million ($0.21 per share, basic and
diluted), $9.7 million ($0.09 per share, basic and
diluted) and $11.0 million
($0.11 per share, basic and diluted), respectively. Net
earnings for the full year 2006 would have been $56.3
million ($0.54 per share, basic and diluted). |
|
(5) |
|
Net earnings in the first and second quarters of 2005
include gains of $5.5 million ($3.3 million after tax) and
$0.9 million ($0.8 million after tax), respectively,
recorded on the sale of excess properties. Excluding the
impact of these gains, net earnings for the first and
second quarters of 2005 would have been $10.4 million
($0.10 per share, basic and diluted) and $20.4 million
($0.20 per share, basic and diluted), respectively. Net
earnings for the full year in 2005 would have been $49.5
million ($0.48 per share, basic and diluted). |
|
(6) |
|
Excluding the impact of $2.1 million in income taxes
in connection with realized foreign exchange gains at the
subsidiary level relating to certain term debt that came
due in 2004, net earnings for the third quarter of 2004
would have been $2.7 million ($0.03 per share, basic and
diluted), net earnings for the fourth quarter of 2004
would have been $12.6 million ($0.12 per share, basic and
diluted) and net earnings for the full year in 2004 would
have been $37.0 million ($0.36 per share, basic and
diluted). |
|
(7) |
|
The Companys common shares split on a three-for one
basis on April 24, 2008. All per share amounts in this
table have been adjusted on a retroactive basis for the
stock split. As well, the closing stock prices presented
in this table have been adjusted for ease of comparison. |
60 RITCHIE BROS. AUCTIONEERS | 2008 ANNUAL REPORT
SELECTED FINANCIAL AND OPERATING DATA
(Tabular dollar amounts expressed in thousands of United States dollars, except per share and operating data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years ended December 31, |
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
Gross auction proceeds
(unaudited) |
|
$ |
3,567,160 |
|
|
$ |
3,186,483 |
|
|
$ |
2,721,023 |
|
|
$ |
2,092,841 |
|
|
$ |
1,789,402 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Statement of operations data: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Auction revenues(1) |
|
$ |
354,818 |
|
|
$ |
311,906 |
|
|
$ |
257,857 |
|
|
$ |
211,562 |
|
|
$ |
182,394 |
|
Direct expenses(1) |
|
|
(49,750 |
) |
|
|
(46,481 |
) |
|
|
(40,457 |
) |
|
|
(29,551 |
) |
|
|
(25,545 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
305,068 |
|
|
|
265,425 |
|
|
|
217,400 |
|
|
|
182,011 |
|
|
|
156,849 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
(24,764 |
) |
|
|
(19,417 |
) |
|
|
(15,017 |
) |
|
|
(13,172 |
) |
|
|
(12,708 |
) |
General and
administrative(1) |
|
|
(164,556 |
) |
|
|
(144,816 |
) |
|
|
(117,714 |
) |
|
|
(93,806 |
) |
|
|
(85,147 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings from operations |
|
|
115,748 |
|
|
|
101,192 |
|
|
|
84,669 |
|
|
|
75,033 |
|
|
|
58,994 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense |
|
|
(859 |
) |
|
|
(1,206 |
) |
|
|
(1,172 |
) |
|
|
(2,224 |
) |
|
|
(3,217 |
) |
Interest income(1) |
|
|
4,994 |
|
|
|
7,393 |
|
|
|
6,664 |
|
|
|
3,587 |
|
|
|
1,936 |
|
Foreign exchange gain
(loss)(1)(2) |
|
|
11,656 |
|
|
|
2,802 |
|
|
|
(451 |
) |
|
|
(864 |
) |
|
|
(520 |
) |
Gain on disposition of
capital assets(3) |
|
|
6,370 |
|
|
|
243 |
|
|
|
1,277 |
|
|
|
6,565 |
|
|
|
229 |
|
Other income (loss) |
|
|
1,375 |
|
|
|
1,471 |
|
|
|
1,079 |
|
|
|
417 |
|
|
|
824 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings before income taxes |
|
|
139,284 |
|
|
|
111,895 |
|
|
|
92,066 |
|
|
|
82,514 |
|
|
|
58,246 |
|
Income taxes(4) |
|
|
(37,884 |
) |
|
|
(35,912 |
) |
|
|
(34,848 |
) |
|
|
(28,934 |
) |
|
|
(23,347 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings(2)(3) |
|
$ |
101,400 |
|
|
$ |
75,983 |
|
|
$ |
57,218 |
|
|
$ |
53,580 |
|
|
$ |
34,899 |
|
|
|
|
Net earnings per
share-diluted(5) |
|
$ |
0.96 |
|
|
$ |
0.72 |
|
|
$ |
0.55 |
|
|
$ |
0.51 |
|
|
$ |
0.34 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance sheet data (end of year): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Working capital (including
cash) |
|
$ |
47,109 |
|
|
$ |
58,207 |
|
|
$ |
94,369 |
|
|
$ |
84,108 |
|
|
$ |
36,871 |
|
Total assets |
|
|
689,488 |
|
|
|
672,887 |
|
|
|
554,227 |
|
|
|
496,396 |
|
|
|
438,522 |
|
Long-term debt |
|
|
67,411 |
|
|
|
44,844 |
|
|
|
43,081 |
|
|
|
43,322 |
|
|
|
10,792 |
|
Total shareholders equity |
|
|
465,162 |
|
|
|
435,116 |
|
|
|
368,637 |
|
|
|
325,183 |
|
|
|
289,264 |
|
|
Selected operating data
(unaudited): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Auction revenues as
percentage of gross auction
proceeds |
|
|
9.95 |
% |
|
|
9.79 |
% |
|
|
9.48 |
% |
|
|
10.11 |
% |
|
|
10.19 |
% |
Number of consignors at
industrial auctions |
|
|
36,595 |
|
|
|
34,931 |
|
|
|
32,075 |
|
|
|
27,912 |
|
|
|
24,868 |
|
Number of bidders at
industrial auctions |
|
|
277,560 |
|
|
|
254,259 |
|
|
|
241,132 |
|
|
|
213,896 |
|
|
|
202,571 |
|
Number of buyers at
industrial auctions |
|
|
84,005 |
|
|
|
80,340 |
|
|
|
73,967 |
|
|
|
62,832 |
|
|
|
58,858 |
|
Number of permanent auction
sites (end of year) |
|
|
30 |
|
|
|
28 |
|
|
|
26 |
|
|
|
23 |
|
|
|
22 |
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Figures have been reclassified to conform with presentation adopted in 2008. |
|
(2) |
|
Foreign exchange gain for the year ended December 31, 2008 included the reclassification of
$15.0 million ($13.6 million after tax, or $0.13 per diluted share) of foreign currency translation
gains relating to the settlement of foreign currency denominated intercompany loans, partially
offset by a $5.8 million ($5.0 million after tax, or $0.05 per diluted share) foreign exchange loss
relating to U.S. dollar denominated bank debt held by a Canadian subsidiary. Foreign exchange
relating to this bank debt in 2007 was a gain of $4.8 million ($4.1 million after tax, or $0.04 per
diluted share), and in 2006 a loss of less than $0.1 million (less than $0.1 million after tax, or
less than $0.1 per diluted share). The Company does not expect such foreign exchange gains or
losses relating to financing transactions to recur in future periods. |
|
(3) |
|
Gain on this disposition
of capital assets for 2008, 2006 and 2005 included net gains on sales of excess properties of $8.3
million ($7.3 million after tax, or $0.07 per diluted share), $1.6 million ($1.0 million after tax,
$0.01 per diluted share) and $6.4 million ($4.1 million after tax, or $0.03 per diluted share),
respectively. |
|
(4) |
|
2004 income tax expense includes $2.1 million (or $0.02 per diluted share) relating to realized
foreign exchange gains at the subsidiary level on certain term debt that came due in 2004, which is
not expected to recur in future periods. |
|
(5) |
|
All per share amounts have been adjusted on a retroactive basis to reflect the three-for-one
stock split that occurred on April 24, 2008. |
RITCHIE BROS. AUCTIONEERS | 2008 ANNUAL REPORT 61
62 RITCHIE BROS. AUCTIONEERS | 2008 ANNUAL REPORT
BOARD OF DIRECTORS
Robert Murdoch Chairman
Bob Murdoch was elected to the Companys Board in 2006.
Mr. Murdoch spent his career with Lafarge Corporation and
affiliates, suppliers of construction materials, retiring
from the position of President and Chief Executive Officer
of Lafarge North America Inc. (NYSE & TSX: LAF) in 1992.
Mr. Murdoch was a member of the board of Lafarge, S.A.
(NYSE: LR; Paris Stock Exchange (Eurolist): LG) the
Paris-based parent company of Lafarge Corporation, until
2005 and still sits on their advisory board. Mr. Murdoch
is a director of Lallemand Inc., Weatherhaven Inc. and
Timberwest Forest Corp. (TSX: TWF.un). Mr.
Murdoch holds an LLB degree. Mr. Murdoch sits on the
Nominating & Corporate Governance Committee.
Peter Blake
Peter Blake joined Ritchie Bros. in 1991, having worked
previously with predecessor firms of
PricewaterhouseCoopers and KPMG. Mr. Blake is a Chartered
Accountant and started with the Company as Controller. He
was appointed Vice President, Finance in 1994, and in 1997
he was appointed Chief Financial Officer and was elected
to the Board. In 2002 Mr. Blake was appointed Senior Vice
President and became CEO effective November 2004.
Beverley Briscoe
Bev Briscoe was appointed to the Ritchie Bros. Board in
2004. Ms. Briscoe has an extensive background working in
industries complementary to the auction business and
currently works as a business consultant and is President
of Briscoe Management Ltd. Ms. Briscoe previously owned
and was president of Hiway Refrigeration Limited. Before
that she held executive positions with Wajax Industries
Ltd., the Rivtow Group, and the Jim Pattison Group, and
was a manager at a predecessor firm of
PricewaterhouseCoopers. Ms. Briscoe is a member of the
boards of BC Rail Group and Goldcorp Inc. (TSX: G; NYSE:
GG), as well as a director of several non-profit
organizations, including the B.C. Forest Safety Council,
the Boys and Girls Club of Greater Vancouver, Forum of
Women Entrepreneurs and Coast Opportunities Funds. Ms.
Briscoe holds a Bachelor of Commerce degree and is a
Chartered Accountant (Fellow). Ms. Briscoe is currently
Chair of the Audit Committee and a member of the
Nominating & Corporate Governance Committee.
Eric Patel
Eric Patel was first elected to the Ritchie Bros. Board in
2004. Mr. Patel has extensive business and financial
experience, and is currently CFO of Pembrook Mining Corp.
(formerly Paget Resources Corporation), a private mining
company. Prior to that Mr. Patel acted as the CFO of
Crystal Decisions, Inc., a privately held software
company. Mr. Patel joined Crystal Decisions in 1999 after
holding executive level positions, including that of CFO,
with University Games, Inc., a privately held manufacturer
of educational toys and games. Before 1997, Mr. Patel
worked for Dreyers Grand Ice Cream as Director of
Strategy, for Marakon
Associates strategy consultants and for Chemical Bank. Mr.
Patel holds an MBA degree. Mr. Patel is currently a member
of the Audit Committee and is Chair of the Nominating &
Corporate Governance Committee.
Edward Pitoniak
Ed Pitoniak was appointed to the Companys Board in 2006
and is currently Chair of the Companys Compensation
Committee. Mr. Pitoniak is a businessman and until 2008
was President and CEO of bcIMC Hospitality, a private
hotel company. Prior to joining the predecessor firm of
bcIMC Hospitality Group in 2004 (Canadian Hotel Income
Properties Real Estate Investment
Trust TSX: HOT.un),
Mr. Pitoniak was a Senior Vice-President at Intrawest
Corporation for eight years. Before Intrawest, Mr.
Pitoniak spent nine years with Times Mirror Magazines,
where he held both top editorial and advertising positions
with Ski Magazine specifically, editor-in-chief and
advertising director. Mr. Pitoniak has a Bachelor of Arts
degree.
Christopher Zimmerman
Chris Zimmerman was elected to the Companys Board in
2008. Mr. Zimmerman is President and Chief Executive
Officer of Canucks Sports and Entertainment in Vancouver,
B.C. Before joining them, Mr. Zimmerman held various
senior positions with Nike, most recently as President and
Chief Executive Officer of Nike Bauer Inc. He joined Nike
in 1998 after spending 16 years in a variety of senior
advertising positions, including USA Advertising Director
for the Nike Brand and Senior Vice President at Saatchi
and Saatchi Advertising in New York, where he directed the
advertising development for brands such as Tide, Wendys,
Champion Sportswear, Finesse Shampoo, Kenner Toys, and
LifeSavers Candy. Mr. Zimmerman has an MBA degree. Mr.
Zimmerman is a member of the Compensation Committee.
James Micali (missing from photo)
Jim Micali was appointed to the Companys Board in 2008.
Mr. Micali is a senior advisor and limited partner of
Azalea Capital (a private equity fund) and a consultant to
Michelin North America. He is also a counsel of Ogletree
Deakins, a labour and employment law firm and an adjunct
professor of Furman University. Mr. Micali retired in
mid-2008 from the position of Chairman and President of
Michelin North America, where he had responsibility for
Michelins operations in North America. He started his
career with Michelin in 1977 and over the years had
responsibility for many of Michelins major business
functions. Prior to joining Michelin, Mr. Micali obtained
his legal education from Boston College Law School and was
admitted to the bars of Rhode Island and Massachusetts.
Mr. Micali also served on the board of directors of
Lafarge North America, a supplier of construction
materials (NYSE & TSX: LAF) from 2003 until May 2006.
Mr. Micali sits on the Boards of Sonoco Products Company
(NYSE: SON), SCANA Corporation (NYSE: SCG) and
American Tire Distributors Holdings, Inc. Mr. Micali is a
member of the Companys Audit Committee and Compensation
Committee.
RITCHIE BROS. AUCTIONEERS | 2008 ANNUAL REPORT 63
SHAREHOLDER INFORMATION
Address
|
|
|
Ritchie Bros.
Auctioneers
Incorporated |
|
|
6500 River Road |
|
|
Richmond, BC |
|
|
Canada, V6X 4G5 |
|
|
Telephone:
|
|
604.273.7564 |
Canada (toll-free):
|
|
1.800.663.1739 |
USA (toll-free):
|
|
1.800.663.8457 |
Facsimile:
|
|
604.273.6873 |
Web site:
|
|
www.rbauction.com |
Board of Directors
|
|
|
Robert W. Murdoch
|
|
Chairman |
|
|
|
Peter J. Blake
|
|
Director & Chief Executive Officer |
|
|
|
Beverley A. Briscoe
|
|
Director |
|
|
|
Eric Patel
|
|
Director |
|
|
|
Edward B. Pitoniak
|
|
Director |
|
|
|
Christopher Zimmerman
|
|
Director |
|
|
|
James M. Micali
|
|
Director |
|
|
|
Shareholders wishing to speak to the Chairman should
call 604.233.6153 or send an email to
leaddirector@rbauction.com. |
Management Advisory Committee
|
|
|
Peter J. Blake*
|
|
Chief Executive Officer |
|
|
|
Robert S. Armstrong*
|
|
Chief Operating Officer |
|
|
|
Jeremy M.T. Black
|
|
VP Business Development; Corporate Secretary |
|
|
|
Joseph P. Boyle
|
|
VP North East USA |
|
|
|
Stephen H. Branch
|
|
VP Marketing |
|
|
|
William A. Cooksley
|
|
VP Information Technology |
|
|
|
Scott L. Forke
|
|
VP Agriculture Division, USA |
|
|
|
Curtis C. Hinkelman*
|
|
Senior VP Eastern USA |
|
|
|
Robert K. Mackay*
|
|
President |
|
|
|
Warwick N. Mackrell
|
|
VP Australia & Asia |
|
|
|
Robert A. McLeod
|
|
Chief Financial Officer |
|
|
|
David D. Nicholson*
|
|
Senior VP Central USA, Mexico & South America |
|
|
|
Victor E. Pospiech*
|
|
Senior VP Administration & Human Resources |
|
|
|
J. Dean Siddle
|
|
VP Senior Valuation Analyst |
|
|
|
Steven C. Simpson*
|
|
Senior VP Western USA |
|
|
|
Kevin R. Tink*
|
|
Senior VP Canada & Agriculture |
|
|
|
Sylvain M. Touchette
|
|
VP Eastern Canada |
|
|
|
Guylain Turgeon*
|
|
Senior VP Managing Director Europe, Middle East & Asia |
|
|
|
Simon A. Wallan
|
|
VP Agriculture |
|
|
|
Karl W. Werner
|
|
VP Auction Operations |
|
|
|
Robert K. Whitsit *
|
|
Senior VP |
|
|
|
* |
|
Member of Executive Council |
Corporate Governance
Corporate governance information, including the Companys Report on Corporate
Governance, which is included in the Companys
Information Circular, is available on the Companys
website at www.rbauction.com.
Investor Relations
Securities analysts, portfolio managers, investors
and representatives of financial institutions
seeking financial and operating information may
contact:
|
|
|
Investor Relations Department |
|
|
Ritchie Bros. Auctioneers |
|
|
6500 River Road |
|
|
Richmond, BC |
|
|
Canada, V6X 4G5 |
|
|
Telephone: |
|
604.273.7564 |
Canada (toll-free): |
|
1.800.663.1739 |
USA (toll-free): |
|
1.800.663.8457 |
Facsimile: |
|
604.273.2405 |
Email: |
|
ir@rbauction.com |
Copies of the Companys filings with the U.S. Securities &
Exchange Commission and with Canadian securities
commissions are available to shareholders and other
interested parties on request or can be accessed directly
on the internet at www.rbauction.com.
Annual Meeting
The annual meeting of the Companys
shareholders will be held at 11am on Friday
April 17, 2009 at the River Rock Resort, 8811
River Road, Richmond, BC V6X 3P8.
Stock Exchanges
Ritchie Bros. Auctioneers Incorporated is listed on the
New York Stock Exchange and the Toronto Stock Exchange
and on both exchanges, trades under the symbol RBA.
Transfer Agent
Communications concerning transfer
requirements, address changes and
lost certificates should be directed
to:
|
|
|
Computershare Trust Company of Canada |
|
|
510 Burrard Street |
|
|
2nd Floor |
|
|
Vancouver, British Columbia |
|
|
Canada, V6C 3B9 |
|
|
Telephone:
|
|
604.661.0226 |
Canada and USA (toll-free):
|
|
1.800.564.6253 |
Facsimile:
|
|
604.661.9401 |
Facsimile (toll-free):
|
|
1.800.249.7775 |
Email:
|
|
jenny.karim@computershare.com |
Self-service:
|
|
www.computershare.com |
|
Co-agent in the United States: |
|
|
Computershare Trust Company of New York |
|
|
New York, NY |
|
|
Auditors
KPMG LLP
Vancouver, Canada
Dividends
All dividends paid by Ritchie Bros. Auctioneers are
eligible dividends, unless indicated otherwise in the
Companys quarterly reports or by press release.
64 RITCHIE BROS. AUCTIONEERS | 2008 ANNUAL REPORT