UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549





FORM 10-Q



(Mark One)

For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2018

-OR-



For the transition period from                      to                     

Commission file number 001-33647



MercadoLibre, Inc.

(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its Charter)







Arias 3751, 7th Floor

Buenos Aires, C1430CRG, Argentina

(Address of registrant’s principal executive offices)

(+5411) 4640-8000

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)



Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports) and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.    Yes   ☒     No   ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Website, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files.    Yes   ☒     No   ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company. See definition of “large accelerated filer”, “accelerated filer”, “smaller reporting company” and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act:





If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).    Yes   ☐     No   ☒

APPLICABLE ONLY TO CORPORATE ISSUERS:

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date.

44,157,364 shares of the issuer’s common stock, $0.001 par value, outstanding as of August 7, 2018.



 



 

---

 



MERCADOLIBRE, INC.

INDEX TO FORM 10-Q

 



 

---

 

MercadoLibre, Inc.

Interim Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

as of June 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017

and for the six and three-month periods

ended June 30, 2018 and 2017

 



 

---

 



MercadoLibre, Inc.

Interim Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets

As of June 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017

(In thousands of U.S. dollars, except par value)

(Unaudited)











The accompanying notes are an integral part of these interim condensed consolidated financial statements.

 

---

 

MercadoLibre, Inc.

Interim Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income

For the six and three-month periods ended June 30, 2018 and 2017

(In thousands of U.S. dollars, except for share data)

(Unaudited)

























The accompanying notes are an integral part of these interim condensed consolidated financial statements.

 

---

 

MercadoLibre, Inc.

Interim Condensed Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income

For the six and three-month periods ended June 30, 2018 and 2017

(In thousands of U.S. dollars)

(Unaudited)













The accompanying notes are an integral part of these interim condensed consolidated financial statements.

 

---

 



MercadoLibre, Inc.

Interim Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flow

For the six and three-month periods ended June 30, 2018 and 2017

(In thousands of U.S. dollars)

(Unaudited)























The accompanying notes are an integral part of these interim condensed consolidated financial statements.

 



 

---

 



1. Nature of Business

MercadoLibre, Inc. (“MercadoLibre” or the “Company”) was incorporated in the state of Delaware, in the United States of America in October 1999. MercadoLibre is one of the largest online commerce ecosystem in Latin America, serving as an integrated regional platform and as an enabler of the necessary online and technology tools to allow businesses and individuals to trade products and services in the region. The Company enables commerce through its marketplace platform (including online classifieds for motor vehicles, vessels, aircraft, services and real estate), which allows users to buy and sell in most of Latin America. 

Through MercadoPago, MercadoLibre enables individuals and businesses to send and receive online payments; through MercadoEnvios, MercadoLibre facilitates the shipping of goods from sellers to buyers; through our advertising products, MercadoLibre facilitates advertising services for large retailers and brands to promote their product and services on the web; through MercadoShops, MercadoLibre allows users to set-up, manage and promote their own online webstores under a subscription-based business model; and through MercadoCredito, MercadoLibre extends loans to certain merchants and consumers. In addition, MercadoLibre develops and sells software enterprise solutions to e-commerce business clients in Brazil.

As of June 30, 2018, MercadoLibre, through its wholly-owned subsidiaries, operated online ecommerce platforms in Argentina, Brazil, Chile, Colombia, Costa Rica, Dominican Republic, Ecuador, Peru, Mexico, Panama, Honduras, Nicaragua, Salvador, Uruguay, Bolivia, Guatemala, Paraguay and Venezuela. Additionally, MercadoLibre operates an online payments solution in Argentina, Brazil, Mexico, Venezuela, Colombia, Chile, Peru and Uruguay. It also offers a shipping solution available in Argentina, Brazil, Mexico, Colombia, Chile and Uruguay. The Company operates a real estate classified platform that covers some areas of State of Florida, in the United States of America.

 

2. Summary of significant accounting policies

Basis of presentation

The accompanying unaudited interim condensed consolidated financial statements are prepared in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (U.S. GAAP) and include the accounts of the Company, its wholly-owned subsidiaries and consolidated Variable Interest Entities (“VIE”). These interim condensed consolidated financial statements are stated in U.S. dollars, except where otherwise indicated. Intercompany transactions and balances with subsidiaries have been eliminated for consolidation purposes.

Substantially all net revenues, cost of net revenues and operating expenses, are generated in the Company’s foreign operations. Operating (loss) income of foreign operations amounted to 99.5% and 97.6% of the consolidated amounts during the six-month periods ended June 30, 2018 and 2017, respectively. Long-lived assets, intangible assets and goodwill located in the foreign jurisdictions totaled $211,369 thousands and $223,134 thousands as of June 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017, respectively.

These interim condensed consolidated financial statements reflect the Company’s consolidated financial position as of June 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017. These financial statements include the Company’s consolidated statements of income and comprehensive income for the six and three-month periods ended June 30, 2018 and 2017 and statement of cash flows for the six-month periods ended June 30, 2018 and 2017. These interim condensed consolidated financial statements include all normal recurring adjustments that management believes are necessary to fairly state the Company’s financial position, operating results and cash flows.

Because all of the disclosures required by U.S. GAAP for annual consolidated financial statements are not included herein, these unaudited interim condensed financial statements should be read in conjunction with the audited consolidated financial statements and the notes thereto for the year ended December 31, 2017, contained in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”). The condensed consolidated statements of income, of comprehensive income and of cash flows for the periods presented herein are not necessarily indicative of results expected for any future period. For a more detailed discussion of the Company’s significant accounting policies, see note 2 to the financial statements in the Company’s Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2017. During the six-month period ended June 30, 2018, there were no material updates made to the Company’s significant accounting policies, except for the adoption of ASC 606 and ASU 2016-16- Income taxes (Topic 740) as of January 1, 2018 and early adoption of ASU 2017-12 Derivatives and Hedging (Topic 815) as of April 1, 2018. See Note 2 of these interim condensed consolidated financial statements for more details.





---

 

Revenue recognition



Revenues are recognized when control of the promised services is transferred to customers, in an amount that reflects the consideration the Company expects to be entitled to in exchange for those services.



Contracts with customers may include promises to transfer multiple services including discounts on current or future services. Determining whether services are considered distinct performance obligations that should be accounted for separately versus together may require significant judgment.



Revenues are recognized when each performance obligation is satisfied by transferring the promised service to the customer according to the following criteria described for each type of service:







Revenue recognition criteria for the services mentioned above are described in note 2 to the consolidated financial statements in the Company’s Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2017.



Contract Balances



Timing of revenue recognition may differ from the timing of invoicing to customers. Receivables represent amounts invoiced and revenue recognized prior to invoicing when the Company has satisfied the performance obligation and has the unconditional right to payment. The allowance for doubtful accounts, loan receivables and chargebacks is estimated based upon our assessment of various factors including historical experience, the age of the accounts receivable balances, current economic conditions and other factors that may affect our customers’ ability to pay. The allowance for doubtful accounts, loan receivables and chargebacks was $29,807 thousands and $19,734 thousands as of June 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017, respectively.



Deferred revenue consists of fees received related to unsatisfied performance obligations at the end of the period in accordance with ASC 606 (as defined below). Due to the generally short-term duration of contracts, the majority of the performance obligations are satisfied in the following reporting period. Deferred revenue as of December 31, 2017 and 2016 was $6,116 thousands and $1,955 thousands, respectively, of which $5,395 thousands and $2,043 thousands were recognized as revenue during the six-months periods ended June 30, 2018 and 2017, respectively.



As of June 30, 2018, total deferred revenue was $5,931 thousands, mainly due to fees related to listing and optional feature services billed and loyalty programs that are expected to be recognized as revenue in the coming months.



Variable Interest Entities (VIE)



A VIE is an entity that (i) has insufficient equity to permit the entity to finance its activities without additional subordinated financial support, (ii) has equity investors who lack the characteristics of a controlling financial interest or (iii) in which the voting rights of some equity investors are disproportionate to their obligation to absorb losses or their right to receive returns, and substantially all of the entity’s activities are conducted on behalf of the equity investors with disproportionately few voting rights. The Company consolidates VIEs of which it is the primary beneficiary. The Company is considered to be the primary beneficiary of a VIE when it has both the power to direct the activities that most significantly impact the entity’s economic performance and the obligation to absorb losses or the right to receive benefits from the entity that could potentially be significant to the VIE. Please see Note 12 to these unaudited interim consolidated financial statements for additional detail on the VIEs used for securitization purposes.

---

 

Foreign currency translation

All of the Company’s consolidated foreign operations have determined the local currency to be their functional currency. Accordingly, these foreign subsidiaries translate assets and liabilities from their local currencies into U.S. dollars by using period-end exchange rates while income and expense accounts are translated at the average rates in effect during the period, unless exchange rates fluctuate significantly during the period, in which case the exchange rates at the date of the transaction are used. The resulting translation adjustment is recorded as a component of other comprehensive (loss) income. See also “Highly inflationary status in Argentina” below for a description of the current inflationary status of Argentina and the expected future impacts of foreign currency translation on the Company’s operations in Argentina.

Derivative Financial Instruments



The Company’s operations are in various foreign currencies and consequently are exposed to foreign currency risk. The Company uses derivative instruments to reduce the volatility of earnings and cash flows. All outstanding derivatives are recognized in the Company’s consolidated balance sheet at fair value. The effective portion of a designated derivative’s gain or loss is initially reported as a component of accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) and is subsequently reclassified into the financial statement line item in which the variability of the hedged item is recorded in the period the hedging transaction affects earnings.



The Company also hedges its economic exposure to foreign currency risk related to foreign currency denominated monetary assets and liabilities with foreign derivative currency contracts. The gains and losses on the foreign exchange derivative contracts economically offset gains and losses on certain foreign currency denominated monetary assets and liabilities recognized in earnings. Accordingly, these outstanding non-designated derivatives are recognized in the Company’s consolidated balance sheet at fair value, and changes in fair value from these contracts are recorded in other income (expense), net in the consolidated statement of income.



Highly inflationary status in Argentina



During May 2018, the International Practices Task Force (“IPTF”) discussed the highly inflationary status of the Argentine economy. Historically, the IPTF has used the Consumer Price Index (“CPI”) when considering the inflationary status of the Argentine economy. Given that the CPI was considered flawed by the current Argentine Government until December 2015 and the new CPI was published as from June 2016, the IPTF considered alternative indices to determine the three-year cumulative inflation.



A highly inflationary economy is one that has cumulative inflation of approximately 100% or more over a three-year period. The alternative three-year cumulative indices at June 30, 2018 exceeded 100%. According to U.S. GAAP, the company should apply highly inflationary accounting no later than July 1, 2018. Therefore, the Company will transition the Argentinian operations to highly inflationary status as of July 1, 2018 and, going forward, will change the functional currency for Argentina from Argentine Pesos to U.S. dollars, which is the functional currency of its immediate parent company.



Argentina is the second principal market of the business (see note 5 – Segment reporting). Recently, the economic environment in this country has been volatile with weak economic conditions, devaluation of local currency, high interest rates, high level of inflation and a large public deficit which generated a financial assistance request from Argentina to the International Monetary Fund.  



The Argentine subsidiaries have monetary assets denominated in Argentine Pesos amounting to $286,664 thousands, and monetary liabilities denominated in Argentine Pesos amounting to $259,028 thousands, as of June 30, 2018, which will expose the Company to foreign exchange losses or gains resulting from exchange rate changes from July 1, 2018 forward. The Company does not anticipate that the change in functional currency will have any significant impact on revenues and expenses, as they were already translated to U.S. dollars for consolidation purposes at exchange rates prevailing at the date of the transaction or at the average monthly rates. Furthermore, although translation of property and equipment and intangible assets with definite useful life at the exchange rate as of July 1, 2018 or the respective date of the subsequent acquisition is likely to maintain the level of the future depreciation charge expressed in U.S. dollars, the Company does not anticipate that effect to be significant. Moreover, the Company has not identified any triggering event or impairment indicator that should be considered to assess the recoverability of the net book value of the fixed assets and goodwill and intangible assets assigned to the Argentine reporting unit as of June 30, 2018. As part of its assessment, the Company considered the expected business and macroeconomic trends, the impact of the change in functional currency as previously mentioned and the net book value of fixed assets and goodwill and intangible assets allocated to the Argentine reporting unit as of June 30, 2018.

---

 

Venezuelan deconsolidation

Effective December 1, 2017, the Company determined that deteriorating conditions in Venezuela had led the Company to no longer meet the accounting criteria for control over its Venezuelan subsidiaries. Venezuela’s recent selective default determination, restrictive exchange controls and suspension of foreign exchange market in Venezuela, the lack of access to U.S. dollars through official currency exchange mechanisms together with the worsening in Venezuela macroeconomic environment resulted in other-than-temporary lack of exchangeability between the Venezuela bolivar and the U.S. dollar, and restricted the Company’s ability to pay dividends and its ability to satisfy other obligations denominated in U.S. dollars. Therefore, in accordance with the applicable accounting standards, as of December 1, 2017, the Company deconsolidated the financial statements of its subsidiaries in Venezuela and began reporting the results under the cost method of accounting.  

Beginning December 1, 2017, the Company no longer includes the results of the Venezuelan subsidiaries in its consolidated financial statements.

Income tax

The Company is subject to U.S. and foreign income taxes. The Company accounts for income taxes following the liability method of accounting which requires the recognition of deferred tax liabilities and assets for the expected future tax consequences of temporary differences between the carrying amounts and the tax bases of assets and liabilities. Deferred tax assets are also recognized for tax loss carryforwards. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. The effect on deferred tax assets or liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in income in the period that includes the enactment date. A valuation allowance is recorded when, based on the available evidence, it is more likely than not that all or a portion of the Company’s deferred tax assets will not be realized. The Company’s income tax expense consists of taxes currently payable, if any, plus the change during the period in the Company’s deferred tax assets and liabilities.

On August 17, 2011, the Argentine government issued a new software development law and on September 9, 2013 a regulatory decree was issued that established new requirements to benefit from the new software development law. The decree establishes requirements to comply with annual incremental ratios related to exports of services and research and development expenses that must be achieved to remain within the tax holiday. The Company’s Argentine subsidiary has to achieve certain required ratios annually under the software development law in order to be eligible for the benefits mentioned below.

On September 17, 2015, the Argentine Industry Secretary issued Resolution 1041/2015 approving the Company’s application for eligibility under the new software development law for the Company’s Argentine subsidiary, Mercadolibre S.R.L. As a result, the Company’s Argentine subsidiary has been granted a tax holiday retroactive from September 18, 2014. A portion of the benefits obtained is a 60% relief of total income tax related to software development activities and a 70% relief of payroll taxes related to software development activities.

The benefits to the Company under the software development law will expire on December 31, 2019. As a result of the Company’s eligibility under the new law, it recorded an income tax benefit of $10,562 thousands and $3,263 thousands during the six and three-month periods ended June 30, 2018, respectively. Aggregate per share effect of the Argentine tax holiday amounted to $0.24 and $0.07 for the six and three-month periods ended June 30, 2018, respectively. Furthermore, the Company recorded a labor cost benefit of $3,735 thousands and $1,719 thousands during the six and three-month periods ended June 30, 2018, respectively. Additionally, $1,001 thousands and $349 thousands were accrued to pay software development law audit fees during the six and three-month periods ended June 30, 2018, respectively. During the six and three-month periods ended June 30, 2017 the Company recorded an income tax benefit of $11,305 thousands and $6,208 thousands, respectively. Aggregate per share effect of the Argentine tax holiday amounted to $0.26 and $0.14 for the six and three-month periods ended June 30, 2017, respectively. Furthermore, the Company recorded a labor cost benefit of $3,496 thousands and $1,505 thousands during the six and three-month periods ended June 30, 2017, respectively. Additionally, $1,036 thousands and $540 thousands were accrued to pay software development law audit fees during the six and three-month periods ended June 30, 2017, respectively.

Tax reform

Argentina

On December 27, 2017, the Argentine Senate approved a comprehensive income tax reform effective since January 1, 2018. The Argentine tax reform, among other things, reduced the prior 35 percent income tax rate applicable to the Argentine entities to 30 percent for 2018 and 2019 and to 25 percent for 2020 and thereafter. The new regulation imposes a withholding income tax on dividends paid by Argentine entities of 7 percent for 2018 and 2019, increasing to 13 percent from 2020 forward. The new regulation also repeals the “equalization tax” (i.e., the prior 35 percent withholding tax applicable to dividends distributed in excess of the accumulated taxable income) for income accrued from January 1, 2018 forward.

---

 

USA

On December 22, 2017, the U.S. government enacted comprehensive tax legislation commonly referred to as the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (the “Tax Act”). The Tax Act made broad and complex changes to the U.S. tax code, including, but not limited to, (1) requiring a one-time transition tax on certain unrepatriated earnings of foreign subsidiaries that is payable over eight years and (2) bonus depreciation that will allow for full expensing of qualified property.

The Tax Act also established new tax laws that came into effect on January 1, 2018, including, but not limited to: (a) the elimination of the corporate alternative minimum tax (AMT); (b) the creation of the base erosion anti-abuse tax (BEAT), a new minimum tax; (c) a general elimination of U.S. federal income taxes on dividends from foreign subsidiaries; (d) a new provision designed to tax global intangible low-taxed income (GILTI), which allows for the possibility of using foreign tax credits (FTCs) and a deduction of up to 50 percent to offset income tax liability (subject to some limitations); (e) a new limitation on deductible interest expense; (f) the repeal of the domestic production activity deduction; (g) limitations on the deductibility of certain executive compensation; (h) limitations on the use of FTCs to reduce the U.S. income tax liability; and (i) limitations on net operating losses (NOLs) generated after December 31, 2017, to 80 percent of taxable income.

The Deemed Repatriation Transition Tax (Transition Tax) is a tax on previously untaxed accumulated and current earnings and profits (E&P) of certain of our foreign subsidiaries. To determine the amount of the Transition Tax, the Company must determine, in addition to other factors, the amount of post-1986 E&P of the relevant subsidiaries, as well as the amount of non-U.S. income taxes paid on such earnings. The company was able to make a reasonable estimate of the Transition Tax and determine that no tax duty related to the Transition Tax is expected to be due because the estimated tax is expected to be offset with available foreign tax credits as of December 31, 2017. Accordingly, no adjustments have been made to income tax expense in 2017. The Transition Tax calculation will not be finalized until the MercadoLibre Inc. Federal Income Tax return is filed.

The Company assessed whether its valuation allowance analysis is affected by various aspects of the Tax Act (including the deemed repatriation of deferred foreign income, GILTI inclusions and new categories of FTCs). As a consequence of such analysis, the Company recorded an increase in valuation allowance of $12,097 thousands to fully reserve the outstanding foreign tax credits as of December 31, 2017.

The Tax Act created a new requirement that certain income (i.e., GILTI) earned by controlled foreign corporations (CFCs) must be included in the gross income of the CFCs’ U.S. shareholder. GILTI is the excess of the shareholder’s “net CFC tested income” over the net deemed tangible income return, which is currently defined as the excess of (1) 10 percent of the aggregate of the U.S. shareholder’s pro rata share of the qualified business asset investment of each CFC with respect to which it is a U.S. shareholder over (2) the amount of certain interest expenses taken into account in the determination of net CFC-tested income.

Under U.S. GAAP, the Company was allowed to make an accounting policy choice of either (1) treating taxes due on future U.S. inclusions in taxable income related to GILTI as a current-period expense when incurred (the “period cost method”) or (2) factoring such amounts into a company’s measurement of its deferred taxes (the “deferred method”). The Company selected the period cost method. Accordingly, the Company has not recorded any impact in connection with the potential GILTI tax as of June 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017.

The Company’s management considers the earnings of our foreign subsidiaries to be indefinitely reinvested, other than certain earnings the distributions of which do not imply withholdings, exchange rate differences or state income taxes, and for that reason has not recorded a deferred tax liability.

As of June 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017, the Company had included under non-current deferred tax assets the foreign tax credits related to the dividend distributions received from its subsidiaries for a total amount of $13,774 thousands and $12,097 thousands, respectively. As of June 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017, the Company recorded a valuation allowance of $13,774 thousands and $12,097 thousands, respectively, to fully impair the outstanding foreign tax credits.

Accumulated other comprehensive loss

The following table sets forth the Company’s accumulated other comprehensive loss as of June 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017:



---

 



The following tables summarize the changes in accumulated balances of other comprehensive loss for the six-month period ended June 30, 2018:













 





Use of estimates

The preparation of interim condensed consolidated financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Estimates are used for, but not limited to accounting for allowances for doubtful accounts, loan receivables and chargebacks, recoverability of goodwill and intangible assets with indefinite useful life, useful life of long-lived assets and intangible assets, impairment of short-term and long-term investments, impairment of long-lived assets, compensation costs relating to the Company’s long term retention plan, fair value of convertible note debt, fair value of investments, fair value of derivative instruments, recognition of income taxes and contingencies. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

Recently Adopted Accounting Standards

Effective January 1, 2018, the Company adopted ASC 606 – Revenue from Contracts with Customers related to revenue recognition (“ASC 606”) issued by the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) in 2014. ASC 606 provides a unified model to determine when and how revenue is recognized. The core principle is that a company should recognize revenue to depict the transfer of promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration for which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. The Company adopted ASC 606 using the full retrospective transition method and recast the prior reporting period presented.

In connection with the MercadoEnvios service, the Company has identified a performance obligation with the seller to arrange for the transportation of the merchandise sold to the buyer using third-party carriers. As the Company acts as agent, upon adoption of ASC 606, the revenues derived from the shipping services are presented net of the respective transportation costs charged by third-party carriers and paid by the Company. As part of the business strategy, the Company may fully or partially subsidize the cost of shipping at the Company’s option. Under the current guidance the Company must account for the subsidized cost of shipping netting of revenues rather than as cost of net sales. For the six and three-month periods ended June 30, 2018, the Company incurred $209,150 thousands and $96,653 thousands, respectively, of subsidized shipping costs that have been incurred and included as a reduction of revenues. For the six and three-month periods ended June 30, 2017, the Company incurred $36,897 thousands and $32,646 thousands, respectively, of subsidized shipping costs that have been included as a reduction of revenues.

---

 

Under the full retrospective method, the Company retrospectively applied ASC 606 to the six and three-month periods ended June 30, 2017. The total impact resulting from the change in presentation of shipping subsidies was a decrease in Net revenues and Cost of net revenues of $36,897 thousands and $32,646 thousands in the Interim Condensed Consolidated Statement of Income for the six and three-month periods ended June 30, 2017, respectively. Additionally, the adoption of ASC 606 did not modify the carrying amount of assets or liabilities as of the beginning of the first period presented, thus, there was no effect on the opening balance of retained earnings as of January 1, 2017.

Furthermore, the adoption did not have a material impact on the Consolidated Balance Sheets as of June 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017, on Net (loss) income for the six and three-month periods ended June 30, 2018 and 2017 and on the Statements of Cash Flows for the six-month periods ended June 30, 2018 and 2017.

In October 2016, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2016-16 (ASU 2016-16) "Income Taxes (Topic 740): Intra-Entity Transfers of Assets Other than Inventory." ASU 2016-16 generally accelerates the recognition of income tax consequences for asset transfers between entities under common control. The Company adopted ASU 2016-16 as of January 1, 2018 using a modified retrospective transition method, resulting in a $2,092 thousands increase to the opening balance of retained earnings.

In August 2017, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2017-12 (ASU 2017-12) "Derivatives and Hedging (Topic 815): Target improvements to accounting for hedging activities." ASU 2017-12 expands and refines hedge accounting for both non-financial and financial risk components and align the recognition and presentation effects of the hedging instrument and the hedged item in the financial statements. The amendments also make certain improvements to simplify the hedge accounting guidance and ease the administrative burden of hedge documentation requirements and assessing hedge effectiveness. The Company early-adopted ASU 2017-12 as of April 1, 2018. The adoption did not have a material impact on the Company’s financial statements for prior periods, as the Company did not engage in hedging activities during any of the comparative periods presented. Please see Note 11 of the Company’s unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements for additional detail on hedging activities. 



Recently issued accounting pronouncements not yet adopted

On February 25, 2016 the FASB issued ASU 2016-02. The amendments in this update create Topic 842, Leases, which supersedes Topic 840, Leases. The core principle of Topic 842 is that a lessee should recognize the assets and liabilities that arise from leases. Previous GAAP did not require lease assets and lease liabilities to be recognized for most leases. A lessee should recognize in the statement of financial position a liability to make lease payments (the lease liability) and a right-of-use asset representing its right to use the underlying asset for the lease term. For leases with a term of 12 months or less, a lessee is permitted to make an accounting policy election by class of underlying asset not to recognize lease assets and lease liabilities. Topic 842 retains a distinction between finance leases and operating leases. The classification criteria for distinguishing between finance leases and operating leases are substantially similar to the classification criteria for distinguishing between capital leases and operating leases in the previous leases guidance. The result of retaining a distinction between finance leases and operating leases is that under the lessee accounting model in Topic 842, the effect of leases in the statement of comprehensive income and the statement of cash flows is largely unchanged from previous GAAP. Based on existing leases currently classified as operating leases, the Company expects to recognize on the statements of financial position right-of-use assets and lease liabilities. The amendments in this update are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018, including interim periods within those fiscal years. Additionally, on July 30, 2018 the FASB issued ASU 2018-11 which includes a new guidance related to a new alternative transition method for the implementation of ASC 842, Leases. Under this new alternative transition method, comparative periods presented in financial statements in the period of adoption will not need to be restated and lessors may elect not to separate lease and non-lease components when certain conditions are met. The Company is assessing the effects that the adoption of this accounting pronouncement may have on the Company’s financial statements and expects the ASU will have a material impact, primarily to the consolidated balance sheets and related disclosures.

On June 16, 2016 the FASB issued the ASU 2016-13 “Financial Instruments-Credit Losses (Topic 326): Measurement of credit losses on financial instruments”. This update amends guidance on reporting credit losses for assets held at amortized cost basis and available for sale debt securities. For assets held at amortized cost basis, this update eliminates the probable initial recognition threshold in current GAAP and, instead, requires an entity to reflect its current estimate of all expected credit losses. For available for sale debt securities, credit losses should be measured in a manner similar to current GAAP, however this topic will require that credit losses be presented as an allowance rather than as a write-down. The new standard is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2019. The Company is assessing the effects that the adoption of this accounting pronouncement may have on its financial statements.  



---

 

3. Net (loss) income per share

Basic earnings per share for the Company’s common stock is computed by dividing, net (loss) income available to common shareholders attributable to common stock for the period by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period.

On June 30, 2014, the Company issued $330 million of 2.25% Convertible Senior Notes due 2019 (see Note 9 of these interim condensed consolidated financial statements). The conversion of these notes are included in the calculation for diluted earnings per share utilizing the “if converted” method. Accordingly, conversion of the notes is not assumed for purposes of computing diluted earnings per share if the effect is antidilutive.

The denominator for diluted net (loss) income per share for the six and three-month periods ended June 30, 2018 and 2017 does not include any effect from the 2014, 2017 and 2018 Capped Call Transactions (as defined in Note 9) because it would be antidilutive. In the event of conversion of any or all of the Notes, the shares that would be delivered to the Company under the Capped Call Transactions are designed to partially neutralize the dilutive effect of the shares that the Company would issue under the Notes. See Note 9 of these interim condensed consolidated financial statements and Note 17 of the financial statements as of December 31, 2017 on Form 10-K for more details.

For the six and three-month periods ended June 30, 2018 and 2017, the effects of the Capped Call Transactions would have been antidilutive and, as a consequence, they were not factored into the calculation of diluted earnings per share.

Net (loss) income per share of common stock is as follows for the six and three-month periods ended June 30, 2018 and 2017:













 

---

 

4. Goodwill and intangible assets



Goodwill and intangible assets

The composition of goodwill and intangible assets is as follows:







Goodwill

The changes in the carrying amount of goodwill for the six-month period ended June 30, 2018 and the year ended December 31, 2017 are as follows:











Intangible assets with definite useful life

Intangible assets with definite useful life are comprised of customer lists, non-compete and non-solicitation agreements, acquired software licenses, other acquired intangible assets including developed technologies and trademarks. Aggregate amortization expense for intangible assets totaled $1,656 thousands and $1,035 thousands for the three-month periods ended June 30, 2018 and 2017, respectively, while aggregate amortization expense for intangible assets for the six-month periods ended June 30, 2018 and 2017 amounted to $3,328 thousands and $2,065 thousands, respectively.

---

 

The following table summarizes the remaining amortization of intangible assets (in thousands of U.S. dollars) with definite useful life as of June 30, 2018:







 



5. Segment reporting

Reporting segments are based upon the Company’s internal organizational structure, the manner in which the Company’s operations are managed and resources are assigned, the criteria used by management to evaluate the Company’s performance, the availability of separate financial information and overall materiality considerations.

Segment reporting is based on geography as the main basis of segment breakdown in accordance with the criteria used for  evaluation of the Company’s performance as determined by management. The Company’s segments include Brazil, Argentina, Mexico and other countries (which includes Chile, Colombia, Costa Rica, Dominican Republic, Ecuador, Panama, Honduras, Nicaragua, Salvador, Bolivia, Guatemala, Paraguay, Peru, Uruguay and the United States of America). As of June 30, 2017, the Company’s segments included Brazil, Argentina, Mexico, Venezuela and other countries.

Direct contribution (loss) consists of net revenues from external customers less direct costs and includes any impairment of long- lived assets. Direct costs include costs of net revenues, product and technology development expenses, sales and marketing expenses and general and administrative expenses over which segment managers have direct discretionary control, such as advertising and marketing programs, customer support expenses, allowances for doubtful accounts, payroll and third-party fees. All corporate related costs have been excluded from the Company’s direct contribution.

Expenses over which segment managers do not currently have discretionary control, such as certain technology and general and administrative costs are monitored by management through shared cost centers and are not evaluated in the measurement of segment performance.

As a consequence of the implementation of ASC 606 further described in Note 2, the Company reassessed the definition of its customers for each service, which resulted in a change of the information presented for net revenues by similar services. As from January 1, 2018, net revenues from shipping services are included as part of our Enhanced Marketplace Services. Such change has been applied retroactively for comparative purposes.

The following tables summarize the financial performance of the Company’s reporting segments:







---

 



















---

 



   The following table summarizes the allocation of property and equipment, net based on geography:







The following table summarizes the allocation of the goodwill and intangible assets based on geography:



---

 

Consolidated net revenues by similar products and services for the six and three-month periods ended June 30, 2018 and 2017 were as follows:









(*)   Includes Final Value Fees and Shipping fees.

(**)  Includes, among other things, Ad Sales, Classified Fees, Payment Fees and other ancillary services. 

(***) Includes $288,678 thousands and $140,173 thousands of Payment Fees for the six-month periods ended June 30, 2018 and 2017, respectively. Includes an amount of $143,915 thousands and $75,013 thousands of Payment Fees for the three-month periods ended June 30, 2018 and 2017, respectively.





6. Fair value measurement of assets and liabilities



The following table summarizes the Company’s financial assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of June 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017:









As of June 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017, the Company’s financial assets valued at fair value consisted of assets valued using i) Level 1 inputs: unadjusted quoted prices in active markets (Level 1 instrument valuations are obtained from observable inputs that reflect quoted prices (unadjusted) for identical assets in active markets); and ii) Level 2 inputs: obtained from readily-available pricing sources for comparable instruments as well as instruments with inactive markets at the measurement date.

As of June 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017, the Company´s liabilities were valued at fair value using level 2 inputs.

The unrealized net gains or losses on short-term and long-term investments are reported as a component of other comprehensive income. The Company does not anticipate any significant realized losses associated with those investments in excess of the Company’s historical cost.

---

 

As of June 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017, the carrying value of the Company’s financial assets and liabilities measured at amortized cost approximated their fair value mainly because of their short-term maturity. These assets and liabilities included cash, cash equivalents, restricted cash and cash equivalents and short-term investments (excluding money markets funds and corporate debt security), accounts receivable, credit cards receivable, loans receivable, funds payable to customers, other assets (excluding derivative instruments), accounts payable, salaries and social security payable (excluding variable LTRP), taxes payable, provisions and other liabilities. The estimated fair value of the convertible senior notes (liability component), which is based on Level 2 inputs, is $325,345 thousands and was determined based on market interest rates. The rest of the loans payable and other financial liabilities approximate their fair value because the interest rates are not materially different from market interest rates. 



The following table summarizes the fair value level for those financial assets and liabilities of the Company measured at amortized cost as of June 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017:









(*) The fair value of the convertible senior notes (including the equity component) is disclosed in Note 9.



As of June 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017, the Company held no direct investments in auction rate securities and does not have any non-financial assets or liabilities measured at fair value.

---

 

As of June 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017, the fair value of money market funds, short and long-term investments classified as available for sale securities are as follows:



















The material portion of the Sovereign Debt Securities consists of U.S. Treasury Notes, which carry no significant risk.

---

 

As of June 30, 2018, the estimated fair values (in thousands of U.S. dollars) of cash equivalents, short-term and long-term investments classified by their effective maturities are as follows:







 

7. Commitments and Contingencies

Litigation and Other Legal Matters

The Company is subject to certain contingent liabilities with respect to existing or potential claims, lawsuits and other proceedings. The Company accrues liabilities when it considers probable that future costs will be incurred and such costs can be reasonably estimated. The proceeding-related reserve is based on developments to date and historical information related to actions filed against the Company. As of June 30, 2018, the Company had established reserves for proceeding-related contingencies and other estimated contingencies of $5,669 thousand to cover legal actions against the Company in which its management has assessed the likelihood of a final adverse outcome as probable. Expected legal costs related to litigations are accrued when the legal service is actually provided.

In addition, as of June 30, 2018 the Company and its subsidiaries are subject to certain legal actions considered by the Company’s management and its legal counsels to be reasonably possible for an aggregate amount up to $7,339 thousand.

No loss amounts have been accrued for such reasonably possible legal actions of which most significant (individually or in the aggregate) are described below and in note 15 to the financial statements in the Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2017.

As of June 30, 2018, there were 71 lawsuits pending against our Argentine subsidiary in the Argentine ordinary courts and 2,482 pending claims in the Argentine Consumer Protection Agencies, where a lawyer is not required to file or pursue a claim.

As of June 30, 2018, 901 legal actions were pending in the Brazilian ordinary courts. In addition, as of June 30, 2018, there were 6,693 cases still pending in Brazilian consumer courts. Filing and pursuing of an action before Brazilian consumer courts do not require the assistance of a lawyer.

As of June 30, 2018, there were 9 claims pending against our Mexican subsidiaries in the Mexican ordinary courts and 230 claims pending against our Mexican subsidiaries in the Mexican Consumer Protection Agencies, where a lawyer is not required to file or pursue a claim.

City of São Paulo Tax Claim

In 2007, São Paulo tax authorities assessed taxes and fines against our Brazilian subsidiary MercadoLivre.com relating to the “Imposto sobre Serviços” for the period from 2005 to 2007 in an approximate amount of $5.9 million according to the exchange rate in effect at that time. In 2007, the Company presented administrative defenses against the authorities’ claim. On September 12, 2009, the São Paulo tax authorities ruled against the Company upholding, the previously assessed taxes and fines. Also in 2009, the Company presented an appeal to the Conselho Municipal de Tributos (São Paulo Municipal Council of Taxes), which reduced the fine. On February 11, 2011, the Company appealed this decision to the Câmaras Reunidas do Conselho Municipal de Tributos (Superior Chamber of the São Paulo Municipal Council of Taxes), which affirmed the reduction of the fine. With this decision, the administrative stage is finished. On August 15, 2011, the Company made a deposit in court of R$9.5 million and filed a lawsuit with the 8th Public Treasury Court of the City of São Paulo, State of São Paulo, Brazil, to contest the taxes and fines assessed by the tax authorities. On May 31, 2016, a lower court judge ruled in favor of the Company. On November 10, 2016, the São Paulo Municipal Council appealed that decision, and the Company presented its counter arguments. On April 12, 2018, the São Paulo Appellate Court rejected an appeal of the São Paulo Municipal Council, confirming the 2016 lower court decision in favor of the Company. On July 4, 2018, the São Paulo Appellate Court denied the admissibility of a subsequent special appeal by the São Paulo Municipal Council. As of the date of this report, the Company is waiting for a further appeal that may be filed by the São Paulo Municipal Council to seek a ruling by the Superior Court of Justice. As of the date of these interim condensed consolidated financial statements, the total amount of the claim is $3.9 million, including surcharges and interest. The opinion of the Company's management, based on the opinion of external legal counsel, is that the risk of losing the case is remote.



---

 

Administrative tax claims

On July 12, 2017, São Paulo tax authorities assessed taxes and fines against our Brazilian subsidiary IBazar relating to “ICMS Publicidade” for the period from July 2012 to December 2013 in an amount of R$12.2 million (or $3.1 million according to the exchange rate in effect at that time). The Company filed an administrative defense against the claim, but the São Paulo authorities ruled against the Company and upheld the assessed taxes and fines. On October 30, 2017, the Company filed an appeal with the Tribunal de Impostos e Taxas de São Paulo (São Paulo Administrative Tax Court), which the court granted on February 23, 2018. As of the date of these interim condensed consolidated financial statements, the Company is waiting an appeal by the São Paulo tax authorities. The opinion of the Company's management, based on the opinion of external legal counsel, is that the risk of losing the case is reasonably possible, but not probable.

Other third parties have from time to time claimed, and others may claim in the future, that the Company was responsible for fraud committed against them, or that the Company has infringed their intellectual property rights. The underlying laws with respect to the potential liability of online intermediaries like the Company are unclear in the jurisdictions where the Company operates. Management believes that additional lawsuits alleging that the Company has violated copyright or trademark laws will be filed against the Company in the future.

Intellectual property and regulatory claims, whether meritorious or not, are time consuming and costly to resolve, require significant amounts of management time, could require expensive changes in the Company’s methods of doing business, or could require the Company to enter into costly royalty or licensing agreements. The Company may be subject to patent disputes, and be subject to patent infringement claims as the Company’s services expand in scope and complexity. In particular, the Company may face additional patent infringement claims involving various aspects of the payments businesses.

From time to time, the Company is involved in other disputes or regulatory inquiries that arise in the ordinary course of business. The number and significance of these disputes and inquiries are increasing as the Company’s business expands and the Company grows larger.

Buyer protection program

The Company provides consumers with a buyer protection program (“BPP”) for all transactions completed through the Company’s online payment solution (“MercadoPago”). This program is designed to protect buyers in the Marketplace from losses due primarily to fraud or counterparty non-performance. The Company’s BPP provides protection to consumers by reimbursing them for the total value of a purchased item and the value of any shipping service paid if it does not arrive or does not match the seller’s description. The Company is entitled to recover from the third-party carrier companies performing the shipping service certain amounts paid under the BPP. Furthermore, in some specific circumstances (i.e. Black Friday, Hot Sale), the Company enters into insurance contracts with third-party insurance companies in order to cover contingencies that may arise from the BPP.

The maximum potential exposure under this program is estimated to be the volume of payments on the Marketplace, for which claims may be made under the terms and conditions of the Company’s BPP. Based on historical losses to date, the Company does not believe that the maximum potential exposure is representative of the actual potential exposure. The Company records a liability with respect to losses under this program when they are probable and the amount can be reasonably estimated.

As of June 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017, management's estimate of the maximum potential exposure related to the Company’s buyer protection program is $648,101 thousands and $925,690 thousands, respectively, for which the Company recorded an allowance of $4,190 thousands and $1,087 thousands, respectively.

Loans payable and other financial liabilities

During the second quarter of 2018, the Company, through its Argentine subsidiary, obtained two lines of credit from Banco de Galicia y Buenos Aires S.A., denominated in Argentine pesos, to be applied to working capital needs. As of June 30, 2018, the amount outstanding under these lines of credit is $36,627 thousands with maturity in November 2018, bears fixed interest at a weighted average rate of 39.25% per annum.

During the first quarter of 2018, the Company obtained a line of credit from JPMorgan Chase Bank N.A. denominated in U.S. dollars, to be applied to working capital needs. As of June 30, 2018, the amount outstanding under this line of credit is $50,073 thousands and bears interest at a fixed rate of 3.44% per annum. This line of credit was fully paid off on July 13, 2018.

During the last quarter of 2017, the Company through its Argentine subsidiary obtained two lines of credit from Citibank N.A. of New York, denominated in Argentine pesos, to be applied to working capital needs. As of June 30, 2018, one line of credit was fully paid off and the amount outstanding under the remaining line of credit is $12,270 thousands and bears interest at a fixed rate of 24.25% per annum. The outstanding amount under this line of credit was fully paid off on July 17, 2018.

---

 

During the last quarter of 2017, the Company, through its Chilean subsidiary obtained a line of credit from Banco de Chile denominated in Chilean pesos, to be applied to working capital needs. As of June 30, 2018, the amount outstanding under this line of credit is $22,331 thousands with maturity in August 2018 and bears interest at a fixed rate of 4.44% per annum.

As of June 30, 2018, the Company, through its Chilean and Uruguayan subsidiaries obtained unsecured lines of credit for an amount of $15,623 thousands which bear interest at rates between 5.90% and 9.11% per annum, and through its Argentine subsidiary obtained an unsecured line of credit for an amount of $9,757 thousands which bears interest at a fixed rate of 36.75% per annum. These lines of credit have maturity date within the next two months.

See Note 9 and Note 12 of these interim condensed consolidated financial statements for details regarding the Company’s 2.25% Convertible Senior Notes due 2019 and collateralized debt securitization transactions, respectively. 



8. Long term retention plan (“LTRP”)



The following table summarizes the 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014, 2015, 2016, 2017 and 2018 long term retention plan accrued compensation expense for the six and three-month periods ended June 30, 2018 and 2017, which are payable in cash according to the decisions made by the Board of Directors:













9. 2.25% Convertible Senior Notes Due 2019

On June 30, 2014, the Company issued $330 million of 2.25% convertible senior notes due 2019 (the “Notes”). The Notes are unsecured, unsubordinated obligations of the Company, which pay interest in cash semi-annually, on January 1 and July 1, at a rate of 2.25% per annum. The Notes will mature on July 1, 2019 unless earlier repurchased or converted in accordance with their terms prior to such date. The Notes may be converted, under specific conditions, based on an initial conversion rate of 7.9353 shares of common stock per $1,000 principal amount of the Notes (equivalent to an initial conversion price of $126.02 per share of common stock), subject to adjustment as described in the indenture governing the Notes. 

Holders may convert their notes at their option at any time prior to January 1, 2019 only under the following circumstances: (1) during any calendar quarter commencing after the calendar quarter ending on September 30, 2014 (and only during such calendar quarter), if the last reported sale price of the common stock for at least 20 trading days (whether or not consecutive) during a period of 30 consecutive trading days ending on the last trading day of the immediately preceding calendar quarter is greater than or equal to 130% of the conversion price on each applicable trading day; (2) during the five business day period after any five consecutive trading day period (the “measurement period”) in which the trading price per $1,000 principal amount of notes for each trading day of the measurement period was less than 98% of the product of the last reported sale price of the Company’s common stock and the conversion rate on each such trading day; or (3) upon the occurrence of specified corporate events. On or after January 1, 2019 until the close of business on the second scheduled trading day immediately preceding the maturity date, holders may convert their notes at any time, regardless of the foregoing circumstances. 

During the period from October 1, 2016 through June 30, 2018, 32 Notes were converted for a total amount of $32 thousands. Additionally, during the second quarter of 2018, the conversion threshold was met again and the Notes became convertible at the holders’ option beginning on July 1, 2018 and ending on September 30, 2018. The determination of whether or not the Notes are convertible must continue to be performed on a quarterly basis. Upon conversion, the Company will pay or deliver, as the case may be, cash, shares of the Company’s common stock or a combination of cash and shares of the Company’s common stock, at the Company’s election. The intention of the Company is to share-settle the total amount due upon conversion of the Notes.

---

 

From July 1, 2018 to the date of issuance of these interim condensed consolidated financial statements, no additional conversion requests were made.

In connection with the issuance of the Notes, the Company paid $19.7 million, $67.3 million and $45.7 million (including transaction expenses) in June 2014, September 2017 and March 2018, respectively, to enter into capped call transactions with respect to shares of the common stock (the “Capped Call Transactions”), with certain financial institutions. The Capped Call Transactions are expected generally to reduce the potential dilution upon conversion of the Notes in the event that the market price of the common stock is greater than the strike price of the Capped Call Transactions. The cost of the Capped Call Transactions is included as a net reduction to additional paid-in capital in the stockholders’ equity section of the consolidated balance sheets.

The total estimated fair value of the Notes was $800.3 million and $829.0 million as of June 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017, respectively. The fair value was determined based on the closing trading price per $100 principal amount of the Notes as of the last day of trading for the period. The Company considered the fair value of the Notes as of June 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017 to be a Level 2 measurement. The fair value of the Notes is primarily affected by the trading price of our common stock and market interest rates. Based on the $298.9 closing price of the Company’s common stock on June 30, 2018, the if-converted value of the Notes exceeded their principal amount by $452.7 million.

The following table presents the carrying amounts of the liability and equity components related to the 2.25% Convertible Senior Notes Due 2019 as of June 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017:









 

The following table presents the interest expense for the contractual interest, the accretion of debt discount and the amortization of debt issuance costs:









 

10. Cash Dividend Distribution

In each of March, May, July and October of 2017, the Board of Directors approved a fixed quarterly cash dividend of $6,624 thousands (or $0.150 per share) on the Company’s outstanding shares of common stock. The dividends were paid on April 17, July 14, October 16, 2017 and January 12, 2018 to stockholders of record as of the close of business on March 31, June 30, September 30, and December 31, 2017.

After reviewing the Company's capital allocation process the Board of Directors has concluded that it has multiple investment opportunities that should generate greater return to shareholders through investing capital into the business as compared to a dividend policy. Consequently, the decision has been made to suspend the payment of dividend to shareholders as of the first quarter of 2018.









---

 

11. Derivative instruments



The Company's operations are in various foreign currencies and consequently are exposed to foreign currency risk. The Company uses foreign currency exchange contracts to reduce the volatility of earnings and cash flows.

As of June 30, 2018 the Company used foreign currency exchange contracts to hedge the foreign currency effects related to the principal amount of certain loans denominated in U.S. dollars owed by a Brazilian subsidiary whose functional currency is the Brazilian Reais. Pursuant to these contracts, the Company will buy a notional amount of $30,000 thousands in May 2019 and $16,500 thousands in June 2019, respectively, at a fixed currency exchange rate of 3.88 and 3.96 Brazilian Reais per U.S. dollar, respectively. The Company designated the foreign currency exchange contracts as cash flow hedges, the derivative’s gain or loss is initially reported as a component of accumulated other comprehensive income (“AOCI”) and subsequently reclassified into earnings in the same period the forecasted transaction affects earnings. As of June 30, 2018, the Company estimated that the whole amount of net derivative losses related to its cash flow hedges included in accumulated other comprehensive income will be reclassified into earnings within the next 12 months.



On June 4, 2018 the Company entered into a foreign currency exchange contract to hedge the foreign currency effects related to certain transactions denominated in U.S. dollars of a Chilean subsidiary whose functional currency is the Chilean Peso. Pursuant to this contract, the Company will buy a notional amount of $20,000 thousands in December 2018, at a fixed currency exchange rate of 630.75 Chilean Pesos per U.S. dollar. This contract was not designated as hedging instrument, and changes in fair value of this contract are recorded in other income (expense), net in the consolidated statement of income.



Foreign exchange contracts



The fair values of the Company's outstanding derivative instruments as of June 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017 were as follows:









12. Securitization Transactions

The process of securitization consists of the issuance of securities collateralized by a pool of assets through a special purpose vehicle, often under a VIE.

The Company securitizes financial assets associated with its loan receivables portfolio. The Company’s securitization transactions typically involve the legal transfer of financial assets to bankruptcy remote special purpose entities (“SPEs”). The Company generally retains economic interests in the collateralized securitization transactions, which are retained in the form of subordinated interests. For accounting purposes, the Company is precluded from recording the transfers of assets in securitization transactions as sales.

The Company started to securitize certain loan receivables through a trust created in Brazil, whose main purpose is to securitize loan receivables provided by the Company to its users. According to the trust contract, the Company has determined that it has both the power to direct the activities of the entity that most significantly impact the entity´s performance and the obligation to absorb losses or the right to receive benefits of the entity that could be significant because it retains the equity certificates of participation, and would therefore also be consolidated. When the Company controls the vehicle, it accounts the securitization transactions as if they were secured financing and therefore the assets, liabilities, and related results are consolidated in its financial statements. 

---

 

As of June 30, 2018, the carrying value of the collateralized debt was $15,679 thousands and bears interest at a rate of Brazilian CI plus 3.5% per annum for a term of 36 months. This secured debt is issued by the trust and includes collateralized securities used to fund MercadoCredito business. The third-party investors in the securitization transactions have legal recourse only to the assets securing the debt and do not have recourse to the Company. Additionally, the cash flows generated by the trust are restricted to the payment of amounts due to third-party investors, but the Company retains the right to residual cash flows. Interest expense on securitization debt was $135 thousand for the six-month period ended June 30, 2018.

These assets and liabilities of the trust are included in the Company’s interim condensed consolidated financial statements as of June 30, 2018 as follows:





















---

 

Item 2 — Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

Cautionary Statement Regarding Forward-Looking Statements

Any statements made or implied in this report that are not statements of historical fact, including statements about our beliefs and expectations, are forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27 A of the Securities Exchange Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and should be evaluated as such. The words “anticipate,” “believe,” “expect,” “intend,” “plan,” “estimate,” “target,” “project,” “should,” “may,” “could,” “will” and similar words and expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements generally relate to information concerning our possible or assumed future results of operations, business strategies, financing plans, competitive position, industry environment, potential growth opportunities, future economic, political and social conditions in the countries in which we operate the effects of future regulation and the effects of competition. Such forward-looking statements reflect, among other things, our current expectations, plans, projections and strategies, anticipated financial results, future events and financial trends affecting our business, all of which are subject to known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other important factors (in addition to those discussed elsewhere in this report) that may cause our actual results to differ materially from those expressed or implied by these forward-looking statements. These risks and uncertainties include, among other things:

Many of these risks are beyond our ability to control or predict. New risk factors emerge from time to time and it is not possible for management to predict all such risk factors, nor can it assess the impact of all such risk factors on our company’s business or the extent to which any factor, or combination of factors, may cause actual results to differ materially from those contained in any forward-looking statements.

These statements are based on currently available information and our current assumptions, expectations and projections about future events. While we believe that our assumptions, expectations and projections are reasonable in view of the currently available information, you are cautioned not to place undue reliance on our forward-looking statements. These statements are not guarantees of future performance. They are subject to future events, risks and uncertainties–many of which are beyond our control-as well as potentially inaccurate assumptions that could cause actual results to differ materially from our expectations and projections. Some of the material risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from our expectations and projections are described in “Item 1A — Risk Factors” in Part I of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2017 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) on February 23, 2018, as updated by those described in “Item 1A — Risk Factors” in Part II of this report and in other reports we file from time to time with the SEC.

You should read that information in conjunction with “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” in Item 2 of Part I of this report, our unaudited interim condensed consolidated financial statements and related notes in Item 1 of Part I of this report and our audited consolidated financial statements and related notes in Item 8 of Part II of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2017. We note such information for investors as permitted by the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. There also may be other factors that we cannot anticipate or that are not described in this report, generally because they are unknown to us or we do not perceive them to be a material risk that could cause results to differ materially from our expectations.

---

 

Forward-looking statements speak only as of the date they are made, and we do not undertake to update these forward-looking statements except as may be required by law. You are advised, however, to review any further disclosures we make on related subjects in our periodic filings with the SEC.

The discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations presents the following:

Other Information

We routinely post important information for investors on our Investor Relations website, http://investor.mercadolibre.com. We use this website as a means of disclosing material, non-public information and for complying with our disclosure obligations under SEC Regulation FD (Fair Disclosure). Accordingly, investors should monitor our Investor Relations website, in addition to following our press releases, SEC filings, public conference calls and webcasts. The information contained on, or that may be accessed through, our website is not incorporated by reference into, and is not a part of, this report.

 

Business Overview

MercadoLibre, Inc. (together with its subsidiaries “us”, “we”, “our” or the “Company”) is one of the largest online commerce ecosystems in Latin America. Our platform is designed to provide users with a complete portfolio of services to facilitate commercial transactions. We are a market leader in e-commerce in each of Argentina, Brazil, Chile, Colombia, Costa Rica, Ecuador, Mexico, Peru, Uruguay and Venezuela, based on number of unique visitors and page views. We also operate online commerce platforms in the Dominican Republic, Honduras, Nicaragua, Salvador, Panama, Bolivia, Guatemala and Paraguay.

Through our platform, we provide buyers and sellers with a robust environment that fosters the development of a large e-commerce community in Latin America, a region with a population of over 635 million people and one of the fastest-growing Internet penetration rates in the world. We believe that we offer technological and commercial solutions that address the distinctive cultural and geographic challenges of operating an online commerce platform in Latin America.

We offer our users an ecosystem of six integrated e-commerce services: the MercadoLibre Marketplace, the MercadoLibre Classifieds Service, the MercadoPago payments solution, the MercadoEnvios shipping service, the MercadoLibre advertising program and the MercadoShops online webstores solution.

The MercadoLibre Marketplace, which we sometimes refer to as our marketplace, is a fully-automated, topically-arranged and user-friendly online commerce service. This service permits both businesses and individuals to list merchandise and conduct sales and purchases online in either a fixed-price or auction-based format.

To complement the MercadoLibre Marketplace, we developed MercadoPago, an integrated online payments solution. MercadoPago is designed to facilitate transactions both on and off our marketplace by providing a mechanism that allows our users to securely, easily and promptly send and receive payments online. Mercado Pago is currently available in: Argentina, Brazil, Mexico, Colombia, Venezuela, Chile, Uruguay and Peru. MercadoPago allows merchants to facilitate checkout and payment processes on their websites and also enables users to simply transfer money to each other either through the website or using the MercadoPago App, available on iOS and Android. Additionally, we launched MercadoCredito, which is designed to extend loans to specific merchants and consumers. Our MercadoCredito solution allows us to deepen our engagement with our merchants, in Argentina, Brazil and Mexico, and consumers, in Argentina, by offering them additional services.

To further enhance our suite of e-commerce services, we launched the MercadoEnvios shipping program in Brazil, Argentina, Mexico, Colombia, Chile and Uruguay. Through MercadoEnvios, we offer a cost-efficient way to utilize our existing distribution chain to fulfill sales on our platform. Sellers opting into the program are able to offer a uniform and seamlessly integrated shipping experience to their buyers at competitive prices. As of June 30, 2018, we also offer free shipping to buyers in Brazil, Argentina, Mexico, Chile and Colombia.

---

 

Through MercadoLibre Classifieds Service, our online classified listing service, our users can also list and purchase motor vehicles, vessels, aircraft, real estate and services in all countries where we operate. Classifieds listings differ from Marketplace listings as they only charge optional placement fees and never final value fees. Our classifieds pages are also a major source of traffic to our website, benefitting both the Marketplace and non-marketplace businesses.

Furthermore, we developed our MercadoLibre advertising program to enable businesses to promote their products and services on the Internet. Through our advertising program, MercadoLibre’s sellers and large advertisers are able to display product ads on our webpages and our associated vertical sites in the region.

Additionally, through MercadoShops, our online store solution, users can set-up, manage and promote their own online store. These stores are hosted by MercadoLibre and offer integration with the other marketplace, payment and advertising services we offer. Users can choose from a basic, free store or pay monthly subscriptions for enhanced functionality and value added services on their store.

MercadoLibre also develops and sells enterprise software solutions to e-commerce business clients in Brazil.



Reporting Segments and Geographic Information

Our segment reporting is based on geography, which is the current criterion we are using to evaluate our segment performance. Our geographic segments include Brazil, Argentina, Mexico and other countries (including Chile, Colombia, Costa Rica, Dominican Republic, Ecuador, Panama, Peru, Bolivia, Honduras, Nicaragua, El Salvador, Guatemala, Paraguay, Uruguay and the United States of America (through real estate classifieds in the State of Florida only)). Venezuela was one of our geographic segments until we deconsolidated our Venezuelan operations, effective as of December 1, 2017 and first disclosed on our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2017. Although we discuss long-term trends in our business, it is our policy not to provide earnings guidance in the traditional sense. We believe that uncertain conditions make the forecasting of near-term results difficult. Further, we seek to make decisions focused primarily on the long-term welfare of our company and believe focusing on short-term earnings does not best serve the interests of our stockholders. We believe that execution of key strategic initiatives as well as our expectations for long-term growth in our markets will best create stockholder value. We, therefore, encourage potential investors to consider this strategy before making an investment in our common stock. A long-term focus may make it more difficult for industry analysts and the market to evaluate the value of our company, which could reduce the value of our common stock or permit competitors with short-term tactics to grow stronger than us.

The following table sets forth the percentage of our consolidated net revenues by segment for the six and three-month periods ended June 30, 2018 and 2017:







(*) Percentages have been calculated using whole-dollar amounts rather than rounded amounts that appear in the table. The table above may not total due to rounding.

(**) The amount incurred in shipping subsidies, which under ASC 606 are netted from revenues was $209.2 million and $36.9 million for the six-month periods ended June 30, 2018 and 2017, respectively. The amount incurred in shipping subsidies was $96.7 million and $32.6 million for the three-month periods ended June 30, 2018 and 2017, respectively. Please refer to Note 2 of our unaudited interim condensed consolidated financial statements for additional detail.

(***) Venezuelan revenues have been deconsolidated since December 1, 2017. Please refer to Note 2 of our unaudited interim condensed consolidated financial statements for additional detail.





---

 

The following table summarizes the changes in our net revenues by segment for the six and three-month periods ended June 30, 2018 and 2017:





(*) Percentages have been calculated using whole-dollar amounts rather than rounded amounts that appear in the table. The table above may not total due to rounding.

(**) The amount incurred in shipping subsidies, which under ASC 606 are netted from revenues was $209.2 million and $36.9 million for the six-month periods ended June 30, 2018 and 2017, respectively. The amount incurred in shipping subsidies was $96.7 million and $32.6 million for the three-month periods ended June 30, 2018 and 2017, respectively. Please refer to Note 2 of our unaudited interim condensed consolidated financial statements for additional detail.

(***) Venezuelan revenues have been deconsolidated since December 1, 2017.  Please refer to Note 2 of our unaudited interim condensed consolidated financial statements for additional detail.

 



Recent Developments



Highly inflationary economy - status in Argentina

             During May 2018, the International Practices Task Force (“IPTF”) discussed the highly inflationary status of the Argentine economy. Historically, the IPTF has used the Consumer Price Index (“CPI”) when considering the inflationary status of the Argentine economy. Given that the CPI was considered flawed by the current Argentine Government until December 2015 and the new CPI was published as from June 2016, the IPTF considered alternative indices to determine the three-year cumulative inflation.

    

      A highly inflationary economy is one that has cumulative inflation of approximately 100% or more over a three-year period. The alternative three-year cumulative indices at June 30, 2018 exceeded 100%. According to U.S. GAAP, we should apply highly inflationary accounting no later than July 1, 2018. Therefore, we will transition the Argentine operations to highly inflationary status as of July 1, 2018 and, going forward, will change the functional currency for Argentina from Argentine Pesos to US dollars, which is the functional currency of its immediate parent company.



      Argentina is the second principal market of the business (see “Segment Information” section in the current document). Recently, the economic environment in this country has been volatile with weak economic conditions, devaluation of local currency, high interest rates, high level of inflation and public deficit which generated a financial assistance request from Argentina to the International Monetary Fund.



 The Argentine subsidiaries have monetary assets denominated in Argentine Pesos amounting to $286.7 million, and monetary liabilities denominated in Argentine Pesos amounting to $259.0 million, as of June 30, 2018, which will expose the Company to foreign exchange losses or gains deriving from the exchange rate changes from July 1, 2018 forward. We do not anticipate that the change in functional currency will have any significant effect on revenues and expenses, as they were already translated to US dollars for consolidation purposes at exchange rates prevailing at the date of the transaction or at the average monthly rates. Furthermore, although translation of property and equipment and intangible assets with definite useful life at exchange rate as of July 1, 2018 or the respective date of the subsequent acquisitions is likely to maintain the level of the future depreciation charge expressed in US dollars, we do not anticipate that effect to be significant. Moreover, we do not identify any triggering event or impairment indicator that should be considered to assess the recoverability of the net book value of the fixed assets and goodwill and intangible assets assigned to the Argentine reporting unit as of June 30, 2018. As part of our assessment, we considered the expected business and macroeconomic trends, the impact of the change in functional currency as previously mentioned and the net book value of fixed assets and goodwill and intangible assets allocated to the Argentine reporting unit as of June 30, 2018.







---

 

Description of Line Items

Net revenues

Effective January 1, 2018, we adopted ASC 606 – Revenue from Contracts with Customers related to revenue recognition (“ASC 606”) issued by the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) in 2014. ASC 606 provides a unified model to determine when and how revenue is recognized. The core principle is that a company should recognize revenue to depict the transfer of promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration for which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. We adopted ASC 606 using the full retrospective transition method and recast the prior reporting period presented.

Under the full retrospective method, we retrospectively applied ASC 606 to the six and three-month period ended June 30, 2017. For the six-month periods ended June 30, 2018 and 2017, we incurred $209.2 millions and $36.9 millions, respectively, of subsidized shipping costs that have been included as a reduction of revenues. For the three-month periods ended June 30, 2018 and 2017, we incurred $96.7 millions and $32.6 millions, respectively, of subsidized shipping costs that have been included as a reduction of revenues The total impact resulting from the change in presentation of shipping subsidies was a decrease in Net revenues and Cost of net revenues of $36.9 millions and $32.6 millions in the Interim Condensed Consolidated Statement of Income for the six and three-month periods ended June 30, 2017, respectively.

We recognize revenues in each of our four geographical reporting segments. Within each of our segments, the services we provide generally fall into two distinct revenue streams, “Enhanced Marketplace” and “Non-Marketplace”.

The following table summarizes our consolidated net revenues by revenue stream for the six and three-month periods ended June 30, 2018 and 2017:







(*)     The table above may not total due to rounding.

(**)    Includes final value fees and shipping fees. The amount incurred in shipping subsidies, which under ASC 606 are netted from revenues was $209.2 million and $36.9 million for the six-month periods ended June 30, 2018 and 2017, respectively. The amount incurred in shipping subsidies was $96.7 million and $32.6 million for the three-month periods ended June 30, 2018 and 2017, respectively. Please refer to Note 2 of our unaudited interim condensed consolidated financial statements for additional detail.

(***)   Includes, among other things, ad sales, classified fees, payment fees and other ancillary services.

(****)  Includes $288.7 million and $140.2 million of Payment Fees for the six-month periods ended June 30, 2018 and 2017, respectively. Includes $143.9 million and $75.0 million of Payment Fees for the three-month periods ended June 30, 2018 and 2017, respectively.

Revenues from Enhanced Marketplace transactions are mainly generated from final value fees and shipping fees net of the third-party carrier costs.

For Enhanced Marketplace services, final value fees represent a percentage of the sale value that is charged to the seller once an item is successfully sold. Our shipping revenues are generated when a buyer elects to receive an item through our shipping service net of the third-party carrier costs.

Revenues for Non-Marketplace services are generated from:

With respect to our MercadoPago service, we generate payment fees attributable to:

---

 

Through our classifieds offerings in motor vehicles, real estate and services, we generate revenues from up-front fees. These fees are charged to sellers who opt to give their listings greater exposure throughout our websites.

Our Advertising revenues are generated by selling either display product and/or text link ads throughout our websites to interested advertisers.

When more than one service is included in one single arrangement with the same customer, we recognize revenue according to multiple element arrangements accounting, distinguishing between each of the services provided and allocating revenues based on their respective estimated selling prices.

We have a highly fragmented customer revenue base given the large numbers of sellers and buyers who use our platforms. For the six-month periods ended June 30, 2018 and 2017, no single customer accounted for more than 5.0% of our net revenues.

Our MercadoLibre Marketplace is available in 18 countries (Argentina, Brazil, Chile, Colombia, Costa Rica, Dominican Republic, Ecuador, Mexico, Panama, Peru, Uruguay, Venezuela, Bolivia, Honduras, Nicaragua, Salvador, Guatemala and Paraguay), and MercadoPago is available in 8 countries (Argentina, Brazil, Chile, Peru, Colombia, Mexico, Uruguay and Venezuela). Additionally, MercadoEnvios is available in 6 countries (Argentina, Brazil, Mexico, Colombia, Chile and Uruguay). The functional currency for each country’s operations is the country’s local currency, except for Venezuela where the functional currency was the U.S. dollar due to Venezuela’s status as a highly inflationary economy. See—“Critical accounting policies and estimates—Foreign Currency Translation” included below. Therefore, our net revenues are generated in multiple foreign currencies and then translated into U.S. dollars at the average monthly exchange rate. Venezuelan revenues have been deconsolidated since December 1, 2017. Please refer to Note 2 to our unaudited interim condensed consolidated financial statements for Venezuela’ deconsolidation details.

Our subsidiaries in Brazil, Argentina and Colombia are subject to certain taxes on revenues which are classified as a cost of net revenues. These taxes represented 10.2% of net revenues for the six-month period ended June 30, 2018, as compared to 9.1% for the same period in 2017. For the three-month period ended June 30, 2018 these taxes represented 11.0% of net revenues, as compared to the 9.1% for the same period in 2017.

Cost of net revenues

Cost of net revenues primarily represents bank and credit card processing charges for transactions and fees paid with credit cards and other payment methods, fraud prevention fees, certain taxes on revenues, certain taxes on bank transactions, compensation for customer support personnel, ISP connectivity charges, depreciation and amortization, hosting and site operation fees, cost of mobile point of sale products sold and other operation costs.

Product and technology development expenses

Our product and technology development related expenses consist primarily of compensation for our engineering and web-development staff, depreciation and amortization costs related to product and technology development, telecommunications costs and payments to third-party suppliers who provide technology maintenance services to us.

Sales and marketing expenses

Our sales and marketing expenses consist primarily of costs of marketing our platforms through online and offline advertising and agreements with portals and search engines, charges related to our buyer protection programs, the salaries of employees involved in these activities, chargebacks related to our MercadoPago operations, bad debt charges, public relations costs, marketing activities for our users and depreciation and amortization costs.

We carry out the majority of our marketing efforts on the Internet. We enter into agreements with portals, search engines, social networks, ad networks and other sites in order to attract Internet users to the MercadoLibre Marketplace and convert them into registered users and active traders on our platform.

We also work intensively on attracting, developing and growing our seller community through our customer support efforts. We have dedicated professionals in most of our operations that work with sellers through trade show participation, seminars and meetings to provide them with important tools and skills to become effective sellers on our platform.

---

 

General and administrative expenses

Our general and administrative expenses consist primarily of salaries for management and administrative staff, compensation for outside directors, long term retention plan compensation, expenses for legal, audit and other professional services, insurance expenses, office space rental expenses, travel and business expenses, as well as depreciation and amortization costs. Our general and administrative expenses include the costs of the following areas: general management, finance, administration, accounting, legal and human resources.

Other income (expenses), net

Other income (expenses) consists primarily of interest income derived from our investments and cash equivalents, interest expense related to financial liabilities and foreign currency gains or losses.

Income tax

We are subject to federal and state taxes in the United States, as well as foreign taxes in the multiple jurisdictions where we operate. Our tax obligations consist of current and deferred income taxes incurred in these jurisdictions. We account for income taxes following the liability method of accounting. A valuation allowance is recorded when, based on the available evidence, it is more likely than not that all or a portion of our deferred tax assets will not be realized. Therefore, our income tax expense consists of taxes currently payable, if any (given that in certain jurisdictions we still have net operating loss carry-forwards), plus the change in our deferred tax assets and liabilities during each period.

 

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

The preparation of our unaudited interim condensed consolidated financial statements and related notes requires us to make judgments, estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses, and related disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities. We have based our estimates on historical experience and on various other assumptions that we believe to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Our management has discussed the development, selection and disclosure of these estimates with our audit committee and our board of directors. Actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions.

An accounting policy is considered to be critical if it requires an accounting estimate to be made based on assumptions about matters that are highly uncertain at the time the estimate is made, and if different estimates that reasonably could have been used, or changes in the accounting estimates that are reasonably likely to occur periodically, could materially impact our interim condensed consolidated financial statements. We believe that the following critical accounting policies reflect the more significant estimates and assumptions used in the preparation of our interim condensed consolidated financial statements.

There have been no significant changes in our critical accounting policies, management estimates or accounting policies since the year ended December 31, 2017 and disclosed in the Form 10-K, see Item – “Critical Accounting Policies”, other than those discussed in Note 2 of our unaudited interim condensed consolidated financial statements.



Foreign Currency Translation

All of our foreign consolidated operations use the local currency as their functional currency. Accordingly, these operating foreign subsidiaries translate assets and liabilities from their local currencies to U.S. dollars using period-end exchange rates while income and expense accounts are translated at the average exchange rates in effect during the period, unless exchange rates fluctuate significantly during the period, in which case the exchange rates at the date of the transaction are used. The resulting translation adjustment is recorded as part of other comprehensive (loss) income, a component of equity. Gains and losses resulting from transactions denominated in non-functional currencies are recognized in earnings. Net foreign currency exchange losses or gains are included in the unaudited interim condensed consolidated statements of income under the caption “Foreign currency (losses) gains”. See also “Highly inflationary status in Argentina” in note 2 of our unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements for a description of the current inflationary status of Argentina and the expected future impacts of foreign currency translation on the Company’s operations in Argentina.

---

 

Venezuelan deconsolidation

Effective December 1, 2017, we determined that deteriorating conditions in Venezuela had led us to no longer meet the accounting criteria for control over our Venezuelan subsidiaries. Venezuela’s recent selective default determination, restrictive exchange controls and suspension of foreign exchange market in Venezuela, the lack of access to U.S. dollars through official currency exchange mechanisms together with the worsening in Venezuela’s macroeconomic environment resulted in other-than-temporary lack of exchangeability between the Venezuela bolivar and the U.S. dollar, and restricted our ability to pay dividends and our ability to satisfy other obligations denominated in U.S. dollars. Therefore, in accordance with the applicable accounting standards, as of December 1, 2017, we deconsolidated the financial statements of our subsidiaries in Venezuela and began reporting the results under the cost method of accounting.

Beginning December 1, 2017, we no longer include the results of the Venezuelan subsidiaries in our consolidated financial statements.

Allowances for doubtful accounts, loan receivables and for chargebacks

We are exposed to losses due to uncollectible accounts and credits to users. Allowances for these items represent our estimate of future losses based on our historical experience. The allowances for doubtful accounts, loan receivables and for chargebacks are recorded as charges to sales and marketing expenses. Historically, our actual losses have been consistent with our charges. However, future adverse changes to our historical experience for doubtful accounts, loan receivables and chargebacks could have a material impact on our future consolidated statements of income and cash flows.

We believe that the accounting estimate related to allowances for doubtful accounts, loans receivables and for chargebacks is a critical accounting estimate because it requires management to make assumptions about future collections and credit analysis. Our management’s assumptions about future collections require significant judgment.  

Legal contingencies

In connection with certain pending litigation and other claims, we have estimated the range of probable loss and provided for such losses through charges to our interim condensed consolidated statement of income. These estimates are based on our assessment of the facts and circumstances and historical information related to actions filed against us at each balance sheet date and are subject to change based upon new information and future events.

Convertible Senior Notes

On June 30, 2014, we issued $330 million of 2.25% convertible senior notes due 2019 (the “Notes”). The Notes may be converted, under specific conditions, based on an initial conversion rate of 7.9353 shares of common stock per $1,000 principal amount of Notes, subject to adjustment as described in the indenture governing the Notes. The convertible debt instrument, within the scope of the cash conversion subsection, was separated into debt and equity components at issuance and a fair value was assigned. The value assigned to the debt component was the estimated fair value, as of the issuance date, of a similar debt without the conversion feature. As of June 30, 2014, we determined the fair value of the liability component of the Notes by reviewing market data that was available for senior, unsecured nonconvertible corporate bonds issued by comparable companies. The difference between the cash proceeds and this estimated fair value represents the value assigned to the equity component and was recorded as a debt discount. The debt discount is amortized using the effective interest method from the origination date through its stated contractual maturity date.

In connection with the issuance of the Notes, we paid $19.7 million, $67.3 million and $45.7 million (including transaction expenses) in June 2014, September 2017 and March 2018, respectively, to enter into capped call transactions with respect to shares of our common stock (the “Capped Call Transactions”), with certain financial institutions. The Capped Call Transactions are expected generally to reduce the potential dilution upon conversion of the Notes in the event that the market price of our common stock is greater than the strike price of the Capped Call Transactions. The cost of the Capped Call Transactions is included as a net reduction to additional paid-in capital in the stockholders’ equity section of our consolidated balance sheets.

For more detailed information in relation to the Notes and the Capped Call Transactions, see “—Results of operations for the six and three-month periods ended June 30, 2018 compared to the six and three-month periods ended June 30, 2017 —Debt” and Note 9 to our unaudited interim condensed consolidated financial statements.

Impairment of long-lived assets, goodwill and intangible assets with indefinite useful life

We review long-lived assets for impairments whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value of an asset may not be recoverable. Furthermore, goodwill and certain indefinite life trademarks are reviewed for impairment at each year-end or more frequently when events or changes in circumstances indicate that their carrying value may not be recoverable.

---

 

We believe that the accounting estimate related to impairment of long-lived assets and goodwill is critical since it is highly susceptible to change from period to period because: (i) it requires management to make assumptions about gross merchandise volume growth, total payment volume, total payment transactions, future interest rates, sales and costs; and (ii) the impact that recognizing an impairment would have on the assets reported on our balance sheet as well as our net income would be material. Management’s assumptions about future sales and future costs require significant judgment.

For additional information, see “Critical Accounting Policies” section in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2017.

Income taxes

We are required to recognize a provision for income taxes based upon taxable income and temporary differences between the book and tax bases of our assets and liabilities for each of the tax jurisdictions in which we operate. This process requires a calculation of taxes payable under currently enacted tax laws in each jurisdiction and an analysis of temporary differences between the book and tax bases of our assets and liabilities, including various accruals, allowances, depreciation and amortization. The tax effect of these temporary differences and the estimated tax benefit from our tax net operating losses are reported as deferred tax assets and liabilities in our consolidated balance sheet. We also assess the likelihood that our net deferred tax assets will be realized from future taxable income. To the extent we believe that it is more likely than not that some portion or all of our deferred tax assets will not be realized, we establish a valuation allowance. As of June 30, 2018, we had a valuation allowance on certain foreign net operating losses based on our assessment that it is more likely than not that the deferred tax asset will not be realized. To the extent we establish a valuation allowance or change the allowance in a period, we reflect the change with a corresponding increase or decrease in our “Income tax expense” line in our unaudited interim condensed consolidated statement of income.

Stock-based compensation

Our board of directors adopted long-term retention plans (“LTRPs”), under which certain eligible employees receive awards. See “Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk —Equity Price Risk” for details on the LTRPs. The variable LTRP awards are calculated based on the fair value of our common stock on the NASDAQ Global Market.

 

Results of operations for the six and three-month periods ended June 30, 2018 compared to the six and three-month periods ended June 30, 2017

The selected financial data for the six and three-month periods ended June 30, 2018 and 2017 discussed herein is derived from our unaudited interim condensed consolidated financial statements included in Item 1 of Part I of this report. These statements include all normal recurring adjustments that management believes are necessary to fairly state our financial position, results of operations and cash flows. The results of operations for the six and three-month periods ended June 30, 2018 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the full year ending December 31, 2018 or for any other period. 

---

 

Statement of income data







(*) The table above may not total due to rounding.

(**) Venezuelan result have been deconsolidated since December 1, 2017, therefore, our 2018 results do not include Venezuelan segment results.

(***) The amount incurred in shipping subsidies, which under ASC 606 are netted from revenues was $209.2 million and $36.9 million for the six-month periods ended June 30, 2018 and 2017, respectively. The amount incurred in shipping subsidies was $96.7 million and $32.6 million for the three-month periods ended June 30, 2018 and 2017, respectively. Please refer to Note 2 of our unaudited interim condensed consolidated financial statements for additional detail.

 

Principal trends in results of operations

Growth in net revenues

Since our inception, we have consistently generated revenue growth from our Enhanced Marketplace and Non-Marketplace revenue streams, driven by the strong growth of our key operational metrics. Our net revenues grew 18.6% in the six-month period ended June 30, 2018 as compared to the same period in 2017. Our successful items sold and total payment volume increased 44.3% and 50.3%, respectively, in the six-month period ended June 30, 2018 as compared to the same period in 2017. Additionally, our number of confirmed registered users was 22.9% higher as of June 30, 2018 as compared to the number of confirmed registered users as of June 30, 2017. Furthermore, our gross merchandise volume (“GMV”) and our successful items shipped increased 24.1% and 73.5%, respectively, in the six-month period ended June 30, 2018 as compared to the same period in 2017. Our growth in net revenues was negatively affected by our implementation of ASC 606. Our shipping subsidies are netted from net revenues when we subsidize the cost of shipping. The free shipping subsidies incurred in the six-month periods ended June 30, 2018 and 2017 amounted to $209.2 million and $36.9 million, respectively. For the six-month period ended June 30, 2017 our revenues include Venezuelan revenues of $28.6 million. As a result of the deconsolidation, since December 1, 2017, our revenues for the six-month period ended June 30, 2018 exclude the revenues of our Venezuelan subsidiaries. Finally, our net revenues were negatively affected by the devaluation of the Argentine Peso of approximately 43.2% during the second quarter of 2018.

---

 

Our net revenues grew 18.1% in the three-month period ended June 30, 2018 as compared to the same period in 2017. Our successful items sold and total payment volume increased 38.8% and 40.4%, respectively, in the three-month period ended June 30, 2018 as compared to the same period in 2017. Additionally, our number of confirmed registered users was 22.9% higher as of June 30, 2018 as compared to the number of confirmed registered users as of June 30, 2017. Furthermore, our GMV and successful items shipped increased 15.2% and 57.9%, respectively, in the three-month period ended June 30, 2018 as compared to the same period in 2017. Our growth in net revenues was negatively affected by our implementation of ASC 606. Our shipping subsidies are netted from net revenues when we subsidize the cost of shipping. The free shipping subsidies incurred in the three-month periods ended June 30, 2018 and 2017 amounted to $96.7 million and $32.6 million, respectively. For the three-month period ended June 30, 2017 our revenues include Venezuelan revenues of $14.2 million. As a result of the deconsolidation, since December 1, 2017, our revenues for the six-month period ended June 30, 2018 exclude the revenues of our Venezuelan subsidiaries. Finally, our net revenues were negatively affected by the devaluation of the Argentine Peso of approximately 43.2% during the second quarter of 2018.

We believe that our growth in net revenues should continue in the future. However, despite this positive historical trend, the current weak macro-economic environment in certain countries in Latin America, coupled with devaluations of certain local currencies in those countries versus the U.S. dollar, high interest rates in those countries and the effects of Venezuelan deconsolidation could cause a decline in year-over-year net revenues, particularly as measured in U.S. dollars. Moreover, in the future, revenues could decline if we continue with our free shipping initiatives and our shipping service grows faster than our marketplace and non-marketplace sales.

Gross profit margins

During the past two years, our business has experienced decreasing gross profit margins, defined as total net revenues minus total cost of net revenues, as a percentage of net revenues.

Our gross profit margins were 49.1% and 61.5% for the six-month periods ended June 30, 2018 and 2017, respectively. For the three-month periods ended June 30, 2018 and 2017, our gross profit margins were 47.6% and 60.4% respectively. The decrease in our gross profit margins resulted primarily from increases in free shipping costs, which are netted from net revenues, and increases in components of cost of net revenues, each as described below:

(i) Increased costs of providing free shipping in Brazil, Mexico, Argentina, Chile and Colombia of $172.3 and $64.0 million for the six and three-month periods ended June 30, 2018, as compared with the same period in 2017, respectively.

(ii) Higher penetration of our payments and shipping solution into our Argentine, Brazilian and Mexican marketplaces. For the six and three-month periods ended June 30, 2018, total volume of payments on our marketplace represented 89.3% and 89.1%, respectively, of our total GMV (excluding motor vehicles, vessels, aircraft, real estate and services); as compared to 79.7% and 80.9%, respectively, for the six and three-month periods ended June 30, 2017. Additionally, for the six and three-month periods ended June 30, 2018, the total number of items shipped through our shipping solution represented 63.6% and 61.8%, respectively, of our total number of successful items sold, as compared to 52.9% and 54.3%, respectively, for the six and three-month periods ended June 30, 2017. Transactions that include such services intrinsically incur incremental costs such as collection fees, which result in lower gross profit margins as compared to other services we offer. In addition, our revenues are typically disclosed net of third party provider costs while sales taxes are paid on the gross amount of revenues, thus, decreasing our gross profit margins in terms of revenues. For the six and three-month periods ended June 30, 2018, collection fees increased $41.4 million and $18.9 million, respectively, as compared to the same period in 2017. For the six and three-month periods ended June 30, 2018, sales tax increased $16.4 million and $10.9 million, respectively, as compared to the same period in 2017.

(iii) Increased cost of products sold of $20.6 and $10.8 million for the six and three-month periods ended June 30, 2018, respectively, as compared with the same period in 2017, related to a higher volumes of mobile points of sales devices sold in Brazil, Argentina and Mexico. This increase generated lower profit margin on mobile points sales of devices transactions.  

(iv) Increased customer support costs of $12.5 and $6.1 million for the six and three-month period ended June 30, 2018, as compared with the same period in 2017, mainly as a consequence of an increase in salaries and wages. The number of customer support employees was 3,205 as of June 30, 2018 as compared with 1,957 as of June 30, 2017.

(v) Increased hosting costs of $11.6 million and $5.0 million for the six and three-month periods ended June 30, 2018, respectively, as compared with the same period in 2017.

In the future, gross profit margins could continue to decline if we continue to offer free shipping and the penetration of our payment solution and our shipping service grows faster than our marketplace sales.

---

 

Operating (loss)/income margins

For the six-month period ended June 30, 2018 as compared to the same period in 2017, our operating (loss)/income margin decreased from a positive margin of 16.9% to a negative margin of 8.8%. For the three-month period ended June 30, 2018 as compared to the same period in 2017, our operating (loss)/income margin decreased from a positive margin of 10.6% to a negative margin of 8.4%. These decreases respond primarily correspond to increases in certain components of cost of net revenues, as described under “Gross profit margins” above, and increases in sales and marketing expenses (driven mainly by online and offline marketing expenses, buyer protection program expenses, bad debt expenses, chargebacks from credit cards and salaries).



Other Data









 

Net revenues





(*) Percentages have been calculated using whole-dollar amounts rather than rounded amounts that appear in the table. The table above may not total due to rounding.

(**) The amount incurred in shipping subsidies, which under ASC 606 are netted from revenues was $209.2 million and $36.9 million for the six-month periods ended June 30, 2018 and 2017, respectively. The amount incurred in shipping subsidies was $96.7 million and $32.6 million for the three-month periods ended June 30, 2018 and 2017, respectively. Please refer to Note 2 of our unaudited interim condensed consolidated financial statements for additional detail.

---

 



Our net revenues grew 18.6% and 18.1% in the six and three-month periods ended June 30, 2018 as compared to the same periods in 2017. The increase in Net Revenues was primarily attributable to increases in the enhanced marketplace transactions volume explained by:









The increase in our net revenues was attributable to a 83.8% increase in our non-marketplace revenues from $195.6 million for the six-month period ended June 30, 2017 compared to $359.5 million for the six-month period ended June 30, 2018, mainly generated by a 50.3% increase in our total payment volume. For the three-month period ended June 30, 2018 our non-marketplace revenues increased 72.5% from $103.9 million in 2017 to $179.2 million in 2018, mainly due to a 40.4% increase in our total payment volume.

The increase in our net revenues was negatively impacted by the Venezuelan deconsolidation in the fourth quarter of 2017. For the six and three-month periods ended June 30, 2017 our revenues include Venezuelan revenues of $28.6 million and $14.2 million, respectively. As a result of the deconsolidation, as of December 1, 2017 our 2018 revenues exclude the revenues of our Venezuelan subsidiaries.

Our net revenues were also negatively impacted by the devaluation of the Argentine Peso of proximately 43.2% during the second quarter of 2018. 

The growth rate of our net revenues also decreased as compared to prior period-over period growth rates a consequence of higher shipping subsidies. For the six-month periods ended June 30, 2018 and 2017, the amount incurred in shipping subsidies, which under ASC 606 are netted from revenues, was $209.2 million and $36.9 million, respectively. For the three-month periods ended June 30, 2018 and 2017, the amount incurred in shipping subsidies, which under ASC 606 are netted from revenues, was $96.7 million and $32.6 million, respectively.





---

 



(*) The amount incurred in shipping subsidies, which under ASC 606 are netted from revenues was $209.2 million and $36.9 million for the six-month periods ended June 30, 2018 and 2017, respectively. The amount incurred in shipping subsidies was $96.7 million and $32.6 million for the three-month periods ended June 30, 2018 and 2017, respectively. Please refer to Note 2 of our unaudited interim condensed consolidated financial statements for additional detail.

(**) Includes, among other things, payment fees, ad sales, classified fees, and other ancillary services.

(***) Percentages have been calculated using whole-dollar amounts rather than rounded amounts that appear in the table. The table above may not total due to rounding.

(****) Venezuelan revenues have been deconsolidated since December 1, 2017. Please refer to Note 2 of our unaudited interim condensed consolidated financial statements for additional detail.

Net revenues for the six and three-month periods ended June 30, 2018 increased in all of our geographic segments, except from Venezuela due to deconsolidation.

Brazil

Enhanced Marketplace revenues in Brazil decreased 24.5% in the six-month period ended June 30, 2018 as compared to the same period in 2017. The decrease was primarily a consequence of $143.9 million in shipping subsidies related to our free shipping initiative launched in the second quarter of 2017, which is presented netted from revenues in accordance with ASC 606 and a 7.2% average devaluation of the local currency. This decrease was partially offset by a 56.2% increase in local currency gross merchandise volume. Non-Marketplace revenues grew 102.2%, a $113.6 million increase, during the same period, mainly driven by: i) a 59.2% increase in the volume of payments transactions; and ii) a 102.4 % increase in ad sales volume.

Enhanced Marketplace revenues in Brazil decreased 13.9% in the three-month period ended June 30, 2018 as compared to the same period in 2017. The decrease was primarily a consequence of $51.7 million in shipping subsidies related to our free shipping initiative launched in the second quarter of 2017, which is presented netted from revenues in accordance with ASC 606, and a 10.9% average devaluation of the local currency. This decrease was partially offset by a 43.9% increase in local currency gross merchandise volume. Non-Marketplace revenues grew 87.7%, a $52.3 million increase, during the same period, mainly driven by: i) a 53.5 % increase in the volume of payments transactions; and ii) a 76.8 % increase in ad sales volume.

---

 

Argentina

Enhanced Marketplace revenues in Argentina increased 3.3% in the six-month period ended June 30, 2018 as compared to the same period in 2017. The increase was primarily a consequence of a 54.9% increase in local currency gross merchandise volume, partially offset by a 27.4% average devaluation of the local currency and a $9.9 million in shipping subsidies related to our free shipping initiative launched in the first quarter of 2018, which is presented netted from revenues in accordance with ASC 606.  Non-Marketplace revenues grew 68.3%, a $39.3 million increase, during the same period, mainly driven by: i) a 27.0% increase in the volume of payments transactions; and ii) a 67.2% increase in ad sales volume.

Enhanced Marketplace revenues in Argentina decreased 7.6% in the three-month period ended June 30, 2018 as compared to the same period in 2017. The decrease was primarily a consequence of a 33.1% average devaluation of the local currency and $5.7 million in shipping subsidies related to our free shipping initiative launched in the first quarter of 2018, which is presented netted from revenues in accordance with ASC 606. This decrease was partially offset by a 56.5% increase in local currency gross merchandise volume. Non-Marketplace revenues grew 54.1%, a $16.5 million increase, during the same period, mainly driven by: i) a 19.4% increase in the volume of payments transactions; and ii) a 63.3% increase in ad sales volume.

Mexico

Enhanced Marketplace revenues in Mexico increased 54.8% in the six-month period ended June 30, 2018, as compared to the same period in 2017, mainly due to a 74.4% increase in local currency gross merchandise volume and a 1.9% average appreciation of local currency, partially offset by an increase of $12.5 million in shipping subsidies related to our free shipping initiative, which is presented netted from revenues in accordance with ASC 606. Non-Marketplace revenues grew 58.5%, a $5.6 million increase, mainly driven by increases in the volume of payments transactions.

Enhanced Marketplace revenues in Mexico increased 60.3% in the three-month period ended June 30, 2018, as compared to the same period in 2017, mainly due to a 72.7% increase in local currency gross merchandise volume, partially offset by an increase of $4.4 million in shipping subsidies related to our free shipping initiative, which is presented netted from revenues in accordance with ASC 606 and a 4.5% average devaluation of local currency. Non-Marketplace revenues grew 64.9%, a $3.2 million increase, during the same period, mainly driven by increases in the volume of payments transactions.

Venezuela

Venezuelan revenues have been deconsolidated since December 1, 2017. Please refer to Note 2 of our unaudited interim condensed consolidated financial statements for additional detail.

The following table sets forth our total net revenues and the sequential quarterly growth of these net revenues for the periods described below:







(*) Percentages have been calculated using whole-dollar amounts rather than rounded amounts that appear in the table.

(**) The amount incurred in shipping subsidies, which under ASC 606 are netted from revenues was $209.2 million and $36.9 million for the six-month periods ended June 30, 2018 and 2017, respectively. The amount incurred in shipping subsidies was $96.7 million and $32.6 million for the three-month periods ended June 30, 2018 and 2017, respectively. Please refer to Note 2 of our unaudited interim condensed consolidated financial statements for additional detail.

(***) Venezuelan revenues have been deconsolidated since December 1, 2017. Please refer to Note 2 of our unaudited interim condensed consolidated financial statements for additional detail.





---

 

The following table sets forth the growth in net revenues in local currencies for the six and three-month periods ended June 30, 2018 as compared to the same period in 2017:













(*) The local currency revenue growth was calculated by using the average monthly exchange rates for each month during 2017 and applying them to the corresponding months in 2018, so as to calculate what our financial results would have been if exchange rates remained stable from one year to the next. See also “Non-GAAP Financial Measures” section below for details on FX neutral measures.

(**) The amount incurred in shipping subsidies, which under ASC 606 are netted from revenues was $209.2 million and $36.9 million for the six-month periods ended June 30, 2018 and 2017, respectively. The amount incurred in shipping subsidies was $96.7 million and $32.6 million for the three-month periods ended June 30, 2018 and 2017, respectively. Please refer to Note 2 of our unaudited interim condensed consolidated financial statements for additional detail.



In Argentina, the increase in local currency growth is due to an increase of our Argentine transactions volume, increase in our shipped items volume, increases in our MercadoPago transactions and a high level of inflation, partially offset by higher shipping subsidies related to our free shipping initiative. 

In Mexico and Brazil, the increase in local currency growth is a consequence of an increase of our Marketplace transactions volumes, increases in our MercadoPago transactions and shipped items volumes partially offset by higher shipping subsidies related to our free shipping initiative.

           

Cost of net revenues







(*) Percentages have been calculated using whole-dollar amounts rather than rounded amounts that appear in the table. The table above may not total due to rounding.

For the six-month period ended June 30, 2018 as compared to the same period of 2017, the increase of $120.7 million in cost of net revenues was primarily attributable to: i) an increase in collection fees of $41.4 million, which was mainly attributable to our Argentine and Brazilian operations as a result of the higher transactions volume of MercadoPago in those countries and higher off-platform transactions; ii) an increase in cost of product sold of $20.6 million as a consequence of higher volumes of mobile points of sales devices sold in Brazil, Argentina and Mexico; iii) an increase in sales taxes of $16.4 million, mainly related to the growth of our Argentine and Brazilian operations; iv) a $12.5 million increase in customer support costs mainly as a consequence of salaries and wages; v) an increase in hosting expenses of $11.6 million; and vi) a $11.4 million increase in other cost of net revenues.

For the three-month period ended June 30, 2018 as compared to the same period of 2017, the increase of $63.3 million in cost of net revenues was primarily attributable to: i) an increase in collection fees of $18.9 million, which was mainly attributable to our Argentine and Brazilian operations as a result of the higher transactions volume of MercadoPago in those countries and higher off-platform transactions; ii) an increase in sales taxes of $10.9 million, mainly related to the growth of our Argentine and Brazilian operations; iii) an increase in cost of product sold of $10.8 million as a consequence of higher volumes of mobile points of sales devices sold in Brazil, Argentina and Mexico; iv) an increase of $7.8 million in other cost of net revenues; v) a $6.1 million increase in customer support costs mainly as a consequence of salaries and wages; and vi) an increase in hosting expenses of $5.0 million.



---

 

Product and technology development expenses







(*) Percentages have been calculated using whole-dollar amounts rather than rounded amounts that appear in the table. The table above may not total due to rounding.



For the six-month period ended June 30, 2018, the increase in product and technology development expenses as compared to the same period in 2017 amounted to $11.2 million. This increase was primarily attributable to: i) an increase of $4.4 million in salaries and wages; ii) an increase in other product and technology development expenses of $3.2 million primarily related to office, travel and accommodation expenses; iii) a $2.2 million increase in expenses incurred for temporary services, primarily related to temporary technology development workers; and iv) a $ 2.0 million increase in depreciation and amortization.



For the three-month period ended June 30, 2018, the increase in product and technology development expenses as compared to the same period in 2017 amounted to $3.1 million. This increase was primarily attributable to: i) an increase in other product and technology development expenses of $1.7 million primarily related to office, travel and accommodation expenses; and ii) an increase of $1.6 million in expenses incurred for temporary services, primarily related to temporary technology development workers, partially offset by a decrease of $0.6 million in salaries and wages.

We believe product development is one of our key competitive advantages and intend to continue to invest in hiring engineers to meet the increasingly sophisticated product expectations of our customer base.

Sales and marketing expenses







(*) Percentages have been calculated using whole-dollar amounts rather than rounded amounts that appear in the table. The table above may not total due to rounding.



For the six-month period ended June 30, 2018, the $108.2 million increase in sales and marketing expenses as compared to the same period in 2017 was primarily attributable to: i) an increase of $55.3 million in online and offline marketing expenses primarily in Brazil, Mexico and Argentina; ii) a $24.8 million increase in our buyer protection program expenses; iii) a $13.5 million increase in our bad debt expenses, primarily related to our credit business; iv) a $6.8 million increase in chargebacks from credit cards due to the increase in our MercadoPago volume; and v) a $5.8 million increase in salaries and wages.



For the three-month period ended June 30, 2018, the $44.4 million increase in sales and marketing expenses as compared to the same period in 2017 was primarily attributable to: i) an increase of $25.0 million in online and offline marketing expenses mainly in Brazil, Mexico and Argentina; ii) a $7.8 million increase in our bad debt expenses, mainly related to our credit business, iii) a $7.2 million increase in our buyer protection program expenses; iv) a $2.1 million increase in chargebacks from credit cards due to the increase in our MercadoPago volume; and v) a $1.1 million increase in salaries and wages.



General and administrative expenses







(*) Percentages have been calculated using whole-dollar amounts rather than rounded amounts that appear in the table. The table above may not total due to rounding. 



---

 

For the six-month period June 30, 2018, the $16.6 million increase in general and administrative expenses as compared to the same period in 2017 was primarily attributable to: i) a $5.5 million increase in salaries and wages; ii) a $4.7 million increase in tax and legal fees; iii) a $3.1 million increase in other general and administrative expenses, mainly related to stamp tax and certain tax withholdings; and iv) a $1.3 increase in depreciation and amortization.



For the three-month period June 30, 2018, the $1.8 million increase in general and administrative expenses as compared to the same period in 2017 was primarily attributable to: i) a $2.5 million increase in tax and legal fees; ii) a $2.4 million increase in other general and administrative expenses, mainly related to stamp tax and certain tax withholdings; iii) a $0.6 million increase in depreciation and amortization; iv) a $0.3 million increase in travel and accommodation expenses and; v) a $0.3 million increase in expenses incurred for temporary services, primarily related to temporary administrative workers. This increase was partially offset by a decrease in salary and wages of $4.7 million, mainly as a consequence of a decrease in LTRP provision.





Impairment of Long-Lived Assets





(*) Percentages have been calculated using whole-dollar amounts rather than rounded amounts that appear in the table. The table above may not total due to rounding.

(**) Venezuelan result have been deconsolidated since December 1, 2017, therefore, our 2018 results do not include Venezuelan segment results. Please refer to note 2 of our unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements for additional detail.



      We recorded an impairment of certain real estate investments owned by our Venezuelan subsidiaries of $2.8 million during the second quarter of 2017.





Other income, net





(*) Percentages have been calculated using whole-dollar amounts rather than rounded amounts that appear in the table. The table above may not total due to rounding.



For the six-month period ended June 30, 2018, the $24.6 million increase in other income (expense), net as compared to the same period in 2017 was primarily attributable to an increase of $39.3 million in foreign exchange gain, partially offset by: i) an increase of $11.0 million in financial expenses, mainly attributable to financial interest related to financial loans in Argentina, Uruguay and Chile; and ii) a $3.7 million decrease in interest income from our financial investments as a result of lower interest rates in Brazil as well as a lower float in Brazil and Argentina. The 2018 foreign exchange gain was mainly as a consequence of: i) a $18.6 million gain arising from the devaluation of the Argentine peso over our U.S. Dollar net asset position in Argentina, partially offset by a $0.5 million loss arising from the devaluation of the Brazilian Reais over our U.S. dollar net liability position in Brazil. The 2017 foreign exchange loss was mainly a consequence of a $22.9 million loss arising from the U.S. Dollar revaluation over our Bolivares Fuertes net asset position in Venezuela, partially offset by a $4.4 million gain arising from the Mexican Peso revaluation over our U.S. Dollar net liability position.



For the three-month period ended June 30, 2018, the $26.9 million increase in other income (expense), net as compared to the same period in 2017 was primarily attributable to an increase of $34.3 million in foreign exchange gain, partially offset by; i) an increase of $6.7 million in financial expenses, mainly attributable to financial interest related to financial loans in Argentina, Uruguay and Chile; and ii) a $0.7 million decrease in interest income from our financial investments as a result of lower interest rates in Brazil as well as a lower float in Brazil and Argentina. The foreign exchange gain for the second quarter of 2018 was mainly a consequence of: i) a $15.5 million gain arising from the devaluation of the Argentine Peso over our U.S. Dollar net asset position in Argentina.  The 2017 foreign exchange loss was mainly a consequence of a $22.0 million loss arising from the U.S. Dollar revaluation over our Bolivares Fuertes net asset position in Venezuela.





---

 



Income tax







(*) Percentages have been calculated using whole-dollar amounts rather than rounded amounts that appear in the table. The table above may not total due to rounding.



During the six-month period ended June 30, 2018 as compared to the same period in 2017, income tax expense decreased by $48.4 million mainly as a consequence of higher pre-tax losses recorded in Mexico (mainly attributable to an increase in our operating costs) and pre-tax losses in Brazil compared to the pre-tax tax gains recorded in Brazil during 2017 (as a result mainly of an increase in our operating costs discussed above); partially offset by a higher income tax expense in our Argentine subsidiaries during the first half of 2018, as compared to the same period in 2017, due to a higher pre-tax gain in 2018.

During the three-month period ended June 30, 2018 as compared to the same period in 2017, income tax expense decreased by $14.8 million mainly as a consequence of pre-tax losses in Brazil compared to the pre-tax tax gains recorded in Brazil during 2017 (as a result mainly of an increase in our operating costs discussed above); partially offset by a higher income tax expense in our Argentine subsidiaries during the second quarter of 2018, as compared to the same period in 2017, due to a higher pre-tax gain in 2018.

On December 27, 2017, the Argentine Senate approved a comprehensive income tax reform effective since January 1, 2018. The Argentine tax reform, among other things, reduces the prior 35 percent income tax rate to 30 percent for 2018 and 2019, and to 25 percent for 2020 and thereafter. The new regulation imposes a withholding income tax on dividends paid by Argentine entities of 7 percent for 2018 and 2019, increasing to 13 percent from 2020 forward. The reform also repeals the prior “equalization tax” (the 35 percent withholding applicable to dividends distributed in excess of the accumulated taxable income) for income accrued from 1 January 2018 forward.

On December 22, 2017, the U.S. government enacted comprehensive tax legislation commonly referred to as the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (the “Tax Act”). The Tax Act makes broad and complex changes to the U.S. tax code, including, but not limited to, (1) requiring a one-time transition tax on certain unrepatriated earnings of foreign subsidiaries that is payable over eight years and (2) bonus depreciation that will allow for full expensing of qualified property.

The Tax Act also established new tax laws that came into effect on January 1, 2018, including, but not limited to: (a) elimination of the corporate alternative minimum tax (AMT); (b) the creation of the base erosion anti-abuse tax (BEAT), a new minimum tax; (c) a general elimination of U.S. federal income taxes on dividends from foreign subsidiaries; (d) a new provision designed to tax global intangible low-taxed income (GILTI), which allows for the possibility of using foreign tax credits (FTCs) and a deduction of up to 50 percent to offset income tax liability (subject to some limitations); (e) a new limitation on deductible interest expense; (f) the repeal of the domestic production activity deduction; (g) limitations on the deductibility of certain executive compensation; (h) limitations on the use of FTCs to reduce the U.S. income tax liability; and (i) limitations on net operating losses (NOLs) generated after December 31, 2017, to 80 percent of taxable income.

The Deemed Repatriation Transition Tax (Transition Tax) is a tax on previously untaxed accumulated and current earnings and profits (E&P) of certain of our foreign subsidiaries. To determine the amount of the Transition Tax, we must determine, in addition to other factors, the amount of post-1986 E&P of the relevant subsidiaries, as well as the amount of non-U.S. income taxes paid on such earnings. The company was able to make a reasonable estimate of the Transition Tax and determine that no tax duty related to the Transition Tax is expected to be due because the estimated tax is expected to be offset with available foreign tax credits as of December 31, 2017. Accordingly, no adjustments have been made to income tax expense. The Transition Tax calculation will not be finalized until the Mercadolibre Inc. Federal Income Tax return is filed.

We assessed whether our valuation allowance analysis is affected by various aspects of the Tax Act (including the deemed repatriation of deferred foreign income, GILTI inclusions and new categories of FTCs). As a consequence of such analysis we recorded an increase in valuation allowance of $12.1 million to fully reserve the outstanding foreign tax credits as of December 31, 2017.

---

 

The Tax Act created a new requirement that certain income (i.e., GILTI) earned by controlled foreign corporations (CFCs) must be included currently in the gross income of the CFCs’ U.S. shareholder. GILTI is the excess of the shareholder’s “net CFC tested income” over the net deemed tangible income return, which is currently defined as the excess of (1) 10 percent of the aggregate of the U.S. shareholder’s pro rata share of the qualified business asset investment of each CFC with respect to which it is a U.S. shareholder over (2) the amount of certain interest expenses taken into account in the determination of net CFC-tested income.

Under U.S. GAAP, we were allowed to make an accounting policy choice of either (1) treating taxes due on future U.S. inclusions in taxable income related to GILTI as a current-period expense when incurred (the “period cost method”) or (2) factoring such amounts into a company’s measurement of its deferred taxes (the “deferred method”). We selected the period cost method. Accordingly, we are not required to record any impact in connection with the potential GILTI tax as of June 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017.

Our management considers the earnings of our foreign subsidiaries to be indefinitely reinvested, other than certain earnings the distributions of which do not imply withholdings, exchange rate differences or state income taxes, and for that reason has not recorded a deferred tax liability.

 As of June 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017, we included the foreign tax credits related to the dividend distributions received from our subsidiaries under non-current deferred tax assets for a total amount of $13.8 million and $12.1 million, respectively. As of June 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017, we recorded valuation allowances of $13.8 million and $12.1 million, respectively, to fully impair the outstanding foreign tax credits.

Our blended tax rate is defined as income tax gain/(expense) as a percentage of (loss)/income before income tax. Our effective income tax rate is defined as the provision for income taxes payable as a percentage of (loss)/income before income tax. The effective income tax rate excludes the effects of the deferred income tax, and complementary income tax.

The following table summarizes our blended and effective tax rates for the six and three-month periods ended June 30, 2018 and 2017:



Our blended tax rate for the six-month period ended June 30, 2018 increased as compared to the same period in 2017 mainly due to the effect of the compensation between pre-tax losses – at a higher tax rate – and pre-tax gains that generated a reduction of our interim consolidated pre-tax result and a higher blended tax rate. Such compensation effect did not take place in the six-month period ended June 30, 2017. For the three-month period ended June 30, 2018, our blended tax rate decreased as compared to the same period in 2017 mainly due to the loss carryforwards generated in Venezuelan subsidiaries in 2017, driven by the devaluation of the local currency, which were not considered recoverable for tax purposes, increasing our 2017 blended tax rate.

Our effective tax rate for the six and three-month periods ended June 30, 2018 decreased as compared to the same periods in 2017 mainly due to an increase in our pre-tax losses in our Brazilian and Mexican subsidiaries, which increased our consolidated pre-tax losses without any corresponding recognition of provision for income taxes.

The following table sets forth our effective income tax rate on a segment basis for the six and three-month periods ended June 30, 2018 and 2017:









(*) Venezuelan results have been deconsolidated since December 1, 2017. Please refer to Note 2 of our unaudited interim condensed consolidated financial statements for additional detail.

---

 

The decrease in the effective income tax rate in our Argentine subsidiaries during the six and three-month periods ended June 30, 2018 as compared to the same periods in 2017 was mainly related to lower temporary differences in the current period that generated a higher deduction in 2018 and also due to a decrease in income tax rate related to tax reform in Argentina.

On August 17, 2011, the Argentine government issued a new software development law and on September 9, 2013 a regulatory decree was issued that established new requirements to benefit from the new software development law. The decree establishes requirements to comply with annual incremental ratios related to exports of services and research and development expenses that must be achieved to remain within the tax holiday. Our Argentine subsidiary has to achieve certain required ratios annually under the software development law in order to be eligible for the benefits mentioned below.

On September 17, 2015, the Argentine Industry Secretary issued Resolution 1041/2015 approving the application for eligibility under the new software development law for the our Argentine subsidiary, Mercadolibre S.R.L. As a result, our Argentine subsidiary has been granted a tax holiday retroactive from September 18, 2014. A portion of the benefits obtained is a 60% relief of total income tax related to software development activities and a 70% relief of payroll taxes related to software development activities.

The benefits to the Company under the software development law will expire on December 31, 2019. As a result of the Company’s eligibility under the new law, it recorded an income tax benefit of $10.6 million and $3.3 million during the six and three-month periods ended June 30, 2018, respectively. Aggregate per share effect of the Argentine tax holiday amounted to $0.24 and $0.07 for the six and three-month periods ended June 30, 2018, respectively. Furthermore, the Company recorded a labor cost benefit of $3.7 million and $1.7 million during the six and three-month periods ended June 30, 2018, respectively. Additionally, $1.0 million and $0.3 million were accrued to pay software development law audit fees during the six and three-month periods ended June 30, 2018, respectively.

The decrease in our Brazilian effective income tax rate, which was negative for the six and three-month periods ended June 30, 2018 as compared to the same period in 2017 was mainly related to the pre-tax loss recorded during 2018 (as a result of a decrease in net revenues because of the increase in our shipping subsidies described above) without any corresponding impact in our provision for income taxes.

The decrease in our Mexican negative effective income tax rate for the six-month periods ended June 30, 2018 as compared with the same period in 2017 is due to the higher pre-tax losses recorded during 2018 (as a result of a decrease in net revenues because of the increase in our shipping subsidies described above) without any corresponding impact in our provision for income taxes. For the three-month period ended June 30, 2018 as compared with the same period in 2017 our Mexican effective income tax rate decreased due to the higher pre-tax losses recorded during 2018 (as a result of a decrease in net revenues because of the increase in our shipping subsidies) without any corresponding impact in our provision for income taxes.



Segment information











---

 



















---

 

 (*) Percentages have been calculated using whole-dollar amounts rather than rounded amounts that appear in the table. The table above may not total due to rounding.

(**) Venezuelan results have been deconsolidated since December 1, 2017. Please refer to Note 2 of our unaudited interim condensed consolidated financial statements for additional detail.

Net revenues

Net revenues for the six and three-month periods ended June 30, 2018 as compared to the same period in 2017, are described above in “Item 2 — Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations — Net revenues”.

Direct costs

Brazil

For the six-month period ended June 30, 2018 as compared to the same period in 2017, direct costs increased by 92.1%, mainly driven by: i) a 143.1% increase in sales and marketing expenses, mainly due to an increase in online and offline marketing expenses, buyer protection program expenses, bad debt expenses, chargebacks from credit cards due to the increase in our MercadoPago volume and salaries and wages; ii) a 78.8% increase in cost of net revenues, mainly attributable to an increase in collection fees as a consequence of higher transactions volume of our MercadoPago business, cost of products sold as a consequence of higher volumes of mobile points of sales devices, sales tax and salaries and wages related to customer service; iii) a 55.3% increase in general and administrative expenses, mainly attributable to an increase in salaries and wages, tax, legal and other fees; and iv) a 40.3% increase in product and technology development expenses, mainly due to an increase in depreciation and amortization expenses and other product development expenses.

For the three-month period ended June 30, 2018 as compared to the same period in 2017, direct costs increased by 82.1%, mainly driven by: i) a 99.0% increase in sales and marketing expenses, mainly due to an increase in online and offline marketing expenses, buyer protection program expenses, bad debt expenses, chargebacks from credit cards due to the increase in our MercadoPago volume and salaries and wages; ii) a 96.9% increase in general and administrative expenses, mainly attributable to an increase in salaries and wages, tax, legal and other fees: iii) a 78.3% increase in cost of net revenues, mainly attributable to an increase in collection fees as a consequence of higher transactions volume of our MercadoPago business, cost of products sold as a consequence of higher volumes of mobile points of sales devices, sales tax and salaries and wages related to customer service; and iv) a 28.6% increase in product and technology development expenses, mainly due to an increase in depreciation and amortization expenses and other product development expenses.

Argentina

For the six-month period ended June 30, 2018 as compared to the same period in 2017, direct costs increased by 32.3%, mainly driven by: i) a 171.4% increase in general and administrative expenses, mainly attributable to an increase in tax, legal and other fees and other general and administrative expenses; ii) a 88.0% increase in sales and marketing expenses, mainly due to an increase in online and offline marketing expenses, bad debt expenses, buyer protection program expenses and chargebacks from credit cards due to the increase in our MercadoPago volume; iii) a 23.1% increase in product and technology development expenses, mainly due to an increase in depreciation and amortization expenses; and iv) a 15.7% increase in cost of net revenues, mainly attributable to an increase in collection fees as a consequence of a higher operation volume of MercadoPago business, cost of products sold as a consequence of higher volumes of mobile points of sales devices and sales taxes.

---

 

For the three-month period ended June 30, 2018 as compared to the same period in 2017, direct costs increased by 36.9%, mainly driven by: i) a 238.2% increase in general and administrative expenses, mainly attributable to an increase in tax, legal and other fees and other general and administrative expenses; ii) a 85.0% increase in sales and marketing expenses, mainly due to an increase in online and offline marketing expenses, bad debt expenses, buyer protection program expenses and chargebacks from credit cards due to the increase in our MercadoPago volume; iii) a 26.9% increase in product and technology development expenses, mainly due to an increase in depreciation and amortization expenses; and iv) a 20.6% increase in cost of net revenues, mainly attributable to an increase in collection fees as a consequence of a higher operation volume of MercadoPago business, cost of products sold as a consequence of higher volumes of mobile points of sales devices and sales taxes.

Mexico

For the six-month period ended June 30, 2018 as compared to the same period in 2017, direct costs increased by 43.0%, mainly driven by: i) an 86.0% increase in cost of net revenues, mainly attributable to an increase in collection fees due to higher MercadoPago penetration, customer support costs and cost of products sold as a consequence of higher volumes of mobile points of sales devices; ii) a 64.3% increase in product and technology development expenses, mainly attributable to depreciation and amortization; iii) a 32.2% increase in sales and marketing expenses, mainly due to increases in online and offline marketing expenses, buyer protection program expenses, chargebacks from credit cards due to the increase in our MercadoPago volume, bad debt expenses  and salaries and wages; and iv) a 7.7% increase in general and administrative expenses. mainly related to salaries and wages.

For the three-month period ended June 30, 2018 as compared to the same period in 2017, direct costs increased by 18.3%, mainly driven by: i) a 72.5% increase in cost of net revenues, mainly attributable to an increase in collection fees due to higher MercadoPago penetration, customer support costs and cost of products sold as a consequence of higher volumes of mobile points of sales devices; ii) a 66.9% increase in product and technology development expenses, mainly attributable to depreciation and amortization; and iii) a 7.7% increase in sales and marketing expenses, mainly due to increases in online and offline marketing expenses, buyer protection program expenses, chargebacks from credit cards due to the increase in our MercadoPago volume, bad debt expenses  and salaries and wages. This increase was partially offset by a 13.6% decrease in general and administrative expenses mainly due to a decrease in salaries and wages and other general and administrative expenses.



Venezuela

Venezuelan operations have been deconsolidated since December 1, 2017. Please refer to Note 2 of our interim condensed consolidated financial statements for additional detail.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Our main cash requirement has been working capital to fund MercadoPago financing operations. We also require cash for capital expenditures relating to technology infrastructure, software applications, office space, business acquisitions, to fund our credit business, to fund the payment of quarterly cash dividends on shares of our common stock and to fund the interest payments on our Notes.

Since our inception, we have funded our operations primarily through contributions received from our stockholders during the first two years of operations, from funds raised during our initial public offering, and from cash generated from our operations. On June 30, 2014, we issued $330 million principal balance of Notes for net proceeds to us of approximately $321.7 million. We have funded MercadoPago mainly by discounting credit card receivables and through cash advances derived from our business.

Additionally, we started to fund our MercadoCredito business through securitization of certain loan receivables through a trust created in Brazil, main of which purpose is to securitize loan receivables provided by the Company to its users. We will be using this funding alternative as the MercadoCredito business requires financing to develop and improve its operations. Please refer to Note 12 of our unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements for further detail on securitization transactions.

As of June 30, 2018, our main source of liquidity, amounting to $593.4 million of cash and cash equivalents, restricted cash and cash equivalents and short-term investments and $11.4 million of long-term investments, was provided by cash generated from operations, proceeds from loans and from the issuance of the Notes. We consider our long-term investments as part of our liquidity because long-term investments are comprised of available-for-sale securities classified as long-term as a consequence of their contractual maturities.

The significant components of our working capital are cash and cash equivalents, restricted cash and cash equivalents, short-term investments, accounts receivable, loans receivable, accounts payable and accrued expenses, funds receivable from and payable to MercadoPago users, and short-term debt.

---

 

As of June 30, 2018, cash and investments of our non-U.S. subsidiaries amounted to $545.1 million, a 90.1% of our consolidated cash, restricted cash and cash equivalents and investments, and our non-U.S. dollar-denominated cash and investments amounted to approximately 80.1% of our consolidated cash and investments. Our non-U.S. dollar-denominated cash and investments are located primarily in Brazil and Argentina.

In the event we change the way we manage our business, our working capital needs could be funded, as in the past, through a combination of the sale of credit card coupons to financial institutions, cash advances from our business and securitization of financial assets through a special purpose vehicle, such as a trust.

The following table presents our cash flows from operating activities, investing activities and financing activities for the six-month periods ended June 30, 2018 and 2017:







  (*) The table above may not total due to rounding.

Net cash provided by operating activities

Cash provided by operating activities consists of net income adjusted for certain non-cash items, and the effect of changes in working capital and other activities:





 

(*) Percentages have been calculated using whole-dollar amounts rather than rounded amounts that appear in the table. The table above may not total due to rounding.

The $119.2 million decrease in net cash provided by operating activities during the six-month period ended June 30, 2018, as compared to the same period in 2017, was primarily driven by a $78.0 million decrease in our net income, a $30.7 million decrease in funds payable to customers, a $16.6 million decrease in accounts receivable, a $15.6 million decrease in prepaid expenses, partially offset by a $62.9 million increase in credit card receivables.

Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities





 

(*) Percentages have been calculated using whole-dollar amounts rather than rounded amounts that appear in the table. The table above may not total due to rounding.

Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities in the six-month period ended June 30, 2018 resulted mainly from purchases of investments of $1,248.5 million, which was offset by proceeds from the sale and maturity of investments of $1,390.7 million, as part of our financial strategy. We used $66.6 million in principal of loans receivable granted to merchants and consumers under our MercadoCredito solution, $42.1 million in the purchase of property plant and equipment (mainly in information technology in Argentina, Brazil and the United States), $4.4 million in advances for property and $0.2 million in purchase of intangible assets.

---

 

Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities





 (*) Percentages have been calculated using whole-dollar amounts rather than rounded amounts that appear in the table. The table above may not total due to rounding.

For the six-month period ended June 30, 2018, $146.7 million in cash was derived from proceeds from loans payable. This increase in cash from financing activities was partially offset by the cash used to fund $45.7 million for the 2018 Capped Call Transactions, $14.9 million for the payments on loans payable and $6.6 million in cash dividends.

In the event that we decide to pursue strategic acquisitions in the future, we may fund them with available cash, third-party debt financing, or by raising equity capital, as market conditions allow.

Debt

On June 30, 2014, we issued $330 million of 2.25% convertible senior notes due 2019. The Notes are unsecured, unsubordinated obligations of our Company, which pay interest in cash semi-annually, on January 1 and July 1, at a rate of 2.25% per annum. The Notes will mature on July 1, 2019 unless earlier repurchased or converted in accordance with their terms prior to such date. The Notes may be converted, under the conditions specified below, based on an initial conversion rate of 7.9353 shares of common stock per $1,000 principal amount of Notes (equivalent to an initial conversion price of approximately $126.02 per share of common stock), subject to adjustment as described in the indenture governing the Notes.

Holders may convert their notes at their option at any time prior to January 1, 2019 only under the following circumstances: (1) during any calendar quarter commencing after the calendar quarter ending on September 30, 2014 (and only during such calendar quarter), if the last reported sale price of the common stock for at least 20 trading days (whether or not consecutive) during a period of 30 consecutive trading days ending on the last trading day of the immediately preceding calendar quarter is greater than or equal to 130% of the conversion price on each applicable trading day; (2) during the five business day period after any five consecutive trading day period (the “measurement period”) in which the trading price per $1,000 principal amount of notes for each trading day of the measurement period was less than 98% of the product of the last reported sale price of our common stock and the conversion rate on each such trading day; or (3) upon the occurrence of specified corporate events. On or after January 1, 2019 until the close of business on the second scheduled trading day immediately preceding the maturity date, holders may convert their notes at any time, regardless of the foregoing circumstances.

As of June 30, 2018, the conversion threshold had been met and the Notes became convertible at the holders’ option beginning on July 1, 2018 and ending on September 30, 2018. The determination of whether or not the Notes are convertible must continue to be performed on a quarterly basis. Upon conversion, the Company will pay or deliver, as the case may be, cash, shares of the Company’s common stock or a combination of cash and shares of the Company’s common stock, at the Company’s election. The intention of the Company is to share-settle the amount due upon conversion of the Notes.

From July 1 to the date of issuance of this form, no additional conversion requests were made.

The total estimated fair value of the Notes was $800.3 million and $829.0 million as of June 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017, respectively. The fair value was determined based on the closing trading price per $100 of the Notes as of the last day of trading for the period. Based on the $298.9 closing price of the Company’s common stock on June 30, 2018, the if-converted value of the Notes exceeded their principal amount by approximately $452.7 million.

During the second quarter of 2018, the Company, through its subsidiaries, obtained certain lines of credit in Argentina, Brazil, Chile and Uruguay primarily to fund the MercadoPago business. Additionally, to fund MercadoCredito business, the Company started to securitize certain loan receivables through its Brazilian trust, whose main purpose is to securitize loan receivables provided by the Company to its users. Please refer to Note 12 of our unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements for additional detail.

---

 

Capped Call Transactions

The net proceeds from the Notes were approximately $321.7 million after considering the transaction costs in an amount of $8.3 million. In connection with the issuance of the Notes, we paid approximately $19.7 million in June 2014 to enter into privately negotiated capped call transactions with respect to our common stock with certain financial institutions (the “2014 Capped Call Transactions”). In September 2017 and March 2018, we paid $67.3 million and $45.7 million (including transaction expenses), respectively, to enter into additional privately negotiated capped call transactions with certain financial institutions (the “2017 Capped Call Transactions” and the “2018 Capped Call Transactions,” respectively, and together with the 2014 Capped Call Transactions, the “Capped Call Transactions”). The 2017 and 2018 Capped Call Transactions are in addition to the 2014 Capped Call Transactions and have a higher strike price and cap price. The 2014 Capped Call Transactions have a cap price of approximately $155.78 per common share, the 2017 Capped Call Transactions have a cap price of approximately $366.06 per common share and the 2018 Capped Call Transactions have a cap price of approximately $467.38 per common share. The Capped Call Transactions are expected generally to reduce the potential dilution upon conversion of the Notes in the event that the market price of our common stock is greater than the strike price of the Capped Call Transactions. The strike price of the 2014 Capped Call Transactions was initially set at $126.02 per common share, which corresponds to the initial conversion price of the Notes. The strike price of the 2017 Capped Call Transactions was initially set at $295.67 per common share. The strike price of the 2018 Capped Call Transactions was initially set at $426.73 per common share. The Capped Call Transactions are subject to anti-dilution adjustments substantially similar to those applicable to the conversion rate of the Notes. The Capped Call Transactions allow us to receive shares of our common stock and/or cash related to the excess conversion value that we would pay to the holders of the Notes upon conversion, up to the applicable cap price.



Cash Dividends

In each of March, May, July and October of 2017, the Board of Directors approved a fixed quarterly cash dividend of $6,624 thousands (or $0.150 per share) on the Company’s outstanding shares of common stock. The dividends were paid on April 17, July 14, October 16, 2017 and January 12, 2018 to stockholders of record as of the close of business on March 31, June 30, September 30 and December 31, 2017.

After reviewing our capital allocation process the Board of Directors has concluded that the Company has multiple investment opportunities that should generate greater returns to shareholders through investing capital into the business than issuing a dividend. Consequently, the decision has been made to suspend the payment of dividends to shareholders as of the first quarter of 2018, as it will free up capital for investment in multiple projects in our various platforms. Any future determination as to the declaration of dividends on our common stock will be made at the discretion of our board of directors and will depend on our earnings, operating and financial condition, capital requirements and other factors deemed relevant by our board of directors, including the applicable requirements of the Delaware General Corporation Law.



Capital expenditures

Our capital expenditures (composed of our payments for property and equipment and intangible assets) for the six-month periods ended June 30, 2018 and 2017 amounted to $46.8 million and $34.6 million, respectively.

During the six-month period ended June 30, 2018, we invested $23.0 million in information technology in Brazil and Argentina, and $11.9 million in our Argentine, Uruguayan, Mexican and Brazilian offices.

We are continually increasing our level of investment in hardware and software licenses necessary to improve and update the technology of our platform and cost of computer software developed internally. We anticipate continued investments in capital expenditures related to information technology in the future as we strive to maintain our position in the Latin American e-commerce market.

We believe that our existing cash and cash equivalents, including the sale of credit card receivables and cash generated from operations will be sufficient to fund our operating activities, property and equipment expenditures and to pay or repay obligations going forward.

 

Off-balance sheet arrangements

As of June 30, 2018, we had no off-balance sheet arrangements that have, or are reasonably likely to have, a current or future material effect on our consolidated financial condition, results of operations, liquidity, capital expenditures or capital resources.

 

---

 

Recently issued accounting pronouncements

See Item 1 of Part I, “Unaudited Interim Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements-Note 2-Summary of significant accounting policies-Recently issued accounting pronouncements.”

 

Non-GAAP Financial Measures

To supplement our consolidated financial statements presented in accordance with U.S. GAAP, we use foreign exchange (“FX”) neutral measures as a non-GAAP measure.

This non-GAAP measure should not be considered in isolation or as a substitute for measures of performance prepared in accordance with U.S. GAAP and may be different from non-GAAP measures used by other companies. In addition, this non-GAAP measure is not based on any comprehensive set of accounting rules or principles. Non-GAAP measures have limitations in that they do not reflect all of the amounts associated with our results of operations as determined in accordance with U.S. GAAP. This non-GAAP financial measure should only be used to evaluate our results of operations in conjunction with the most comparable U.S. GAAP financial measures.

Reconciliation of this non-GAAP financial measure to the most comparable U.S. GAAP financial measure can be found in the table included in this quarterly report.





We believe that reconciliation of FX neutral measures to the most directly comparable GAAP measure provides investors an overall understanding of our current financial performance and its prospects for the future. Specifically, we believe this FX neutral non-GAAP measure provide useful information to both management and investors by excluding the foreign currency exchange rate impact that may not be indicative of our core operating results and business outlook. 

The FX neutral measures were calculated by using the average monthly exchange rates for each month during 2017 and applying them to the corresponding months in 2018, so as to calculate what our results would have been if exchange rates remained stable from one year to the next. The table below excludes intercompany allocation FX effects. Finally, this measures does not include any other macroeconomic effect such as local currency inflation effects, the impact on impairment calculations or any price adjustment to compensate local currency inflation or devaluations.

The following table sets forth the FX neutral measures related to our reported results of the operations for the six and three-month periods ended June 30, 2018:







---

 







 (*) The table above may not total due to rounding.



---

 

Item 3 — Qualitative and Quantitative Disclosure About Market Risk

We are exposed to market risks arising from our business operations. These market risks arise mainly from the possibility that changes in interest rates and the U.S. dollar exchange rate with local currencies, particularly the Brazilian Reais and Argentine Peso due to Brazil’s and Argentine’s respective share of our revenues, may affect the value of our financial assets and liabilities.

Foreign currencies

We have significant operations internationally that are denominated in foreign currencies, primarily the Brazilian Reais, Argentine Peso, Mexican Peso, Colombian Peso and Chilean Peso, subjecting us to foreign currency risk which may adversely impact our financial results. We transact business in various foreign currencies and have significant international revenues and costs. In addition, we charge our international subsidiaries for their use of intellectual property and technology and for certain corporate services. Our cash flows, results of operations and certain of our intercompany balances that are exposed to foreign exchange rate fluctuations may differ materially from expectations and we may record significant gains or losses due to foreign currency fluctuations and related hedging activities.

We have a foreign exchange exposure management plan designed to identify material foreign currency exposures, manage these exposures and reduce the potential effects of currency fluctuations on our reported condensed consolidated cash flows and results of operations through the execution of foreign currency exchange contracts. These foreign currency exchange contracts are accounted for as derivative instruments. For additional details related to our foreign currency exchange contracts, see “Note 11—Derivative Instruments” to our unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements included in this report.

We use foreign currency exchange contracts to protect our forecasted U.S. dollar-equivalent earnings from adverse changes in foreign currency exchange rates. These hedging contracts reduce, but do not entirely eliminate, the impact of adverse currency exchange rate movements. We designate these contracts as cash flow hedges for accounting purposes. In case the derivate qualify for hedge accounting, the gain or loss is initially reported as a component of accumulated other comprehensive income ("AOCI") and subsequently reclassified into earnings in the same period the transaction affects earnings. In the case the derivate does not qualify for hedge accounting, the gain or loss is reported directly into earnings.

As of June 30, 2018, we hold cash and cash equivalents in local currencies in our subsidiaries, and have receivables denominated in local currencies in all of our operations. Our subsidiaries generate revenues and incur most of their expenses in the respective local currencies of the countries in which they operate. As a result, our subsidiaries use their local currency as their functional currency. For the first half of 2017 our Venezuelan subsidiaries used the U.S. dollar as if it is the functional currency due to Venezuela being a highly inflationary environment. As of June 30, 2018, the total cash and cash equivalents denominated in foreign currencies totaled $400.5 million, short-term investments denominated in foreign currencies totaled $68.7 million and accounts receivable, credit cards receivable and loans receivable in foreign currencies totaled $446.9 million. As of June 30, 2018, we had no long-term investments denominated in foreign currencies. To manage exchange rate risk, our treasury policy is to transfer most cash and cash equivalents in excess of working capital requirements into U.S. dollar-denominated accounts in the United States. As of June 30, 2018, our U.S. dollar-denominated cash and cash equivalents and short-term investments totaled $124.2 million and our U.S. dollar-denominated long-term investments totaled $11.4 million.

Please see “Recent Development” section in the current report for further detail on Argentina’s economy status.

For the six-month period ended June 30, 2018, we had a consolidated gain on foreign currency of $18.2 million primarily as a result of: i) a $18.6 million gain arising from the devaluation of the Argentine Peso over our U.S. Dollar net asset position in Argentina, partially offset by a $0.5 million loss arising from the devaluation of the Brazilian Reais over our U.S. Dollar net liability position in Brazil. 

---

 

If the U.S. dollar weakens against foreign currencies, the translation of these foreign-currency-denominated transactions will result in increased net revenues, operating expenses and net income while the re-measurement of our net asset position in U.S. dollars will have a negative impact in our Statement of Income. Similarly, our net revenues, operating expenses and net income will decrease if the U.S. dollar strengthens against foreign currencies, while the re-measurement of our net asset position in U.S. dollars will have a positive impact in our Statement of Income.

The following table sets forth the percentage of consolidated net revenues by segment for the six and three-month periods ended June 30, 2018 and 2017:







 (*) Percentages have been calculated using whole-dollar amounts.

(**) Venezuelan revenues have been deconsolidated since December 1, 2017. Please refer to Note 2 of our unaudited interim condensed consolidated financial statements for additional detail.





Foreign Currency Sensitivity Analysis

The table below shows the impact on our net revenues, expenses, other expenses and income tax, net income and equity for a positive and a negative 10% fluctuation on all the foreign currencies to which we are exposed to for the six-month period ended June 30, 2018:









(*)  The table above may not total due to rounding.



The table above shows an increase in our net loss when the U.S. dollar weakens against foreign currencies because of the joint negative impact of the re-measurement of our net asset position in U.S. dollars and the increase in our (loss)/income from operations and other expenses, net and income tax lines related to the translation effect. Similarly, the table above shows a decrease in our net loss when the U.S. dollar strengthens against foreign currencies because the re-measurement of our net asset position in U.S. dollars has a lesser impact than the increase in our (loss)/income from operations and other expenses, net and income tax lines related to the translation effect.

During the six and three-month periods ended June 30, 2018, we entered into hedging transactions in Brazil and in Chile in order to reduce the volatility of earnings and cash flows associated with changes in foreign currency exchange rates. Please refer to Note 11 of our unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements for additional detail on derivative instruments.

---

 



















Argentine Segment

As of June 30, 2018, the Argentine Peso exchange rate against the U.S. dollar was 28.9. 

Had a hypothetical devaluation of 10% of the Argentine peso against the U.S. dollar occurred on June 30, 2018, the reported net assets in our Argentine subsidiaries would have decreased by approximately $19.9 million with a related impact on Other Comprehensive Income. Additionally, we would have recorded a foreign exchange gain amounting to approximately $9.5 million in our Argentine subsidiaries.

During May 2018, the International Practices Task Force (“IPTF”) discussed the highly inflationary status of the Argentine economy. A highly inflationary economy is one that has cumulative inflation of approximately 100% or more over a three-year period. The alternative three-year cumulative indices at June 30, 2018 exceeded 100%. Therefore, the Company will transition the Argentine operations to highly inflationary status as of July 1, 2018, please refer to the “Recent Developments” section for further detail on Argentine inflation status.

Brazilian Segment

As of June 30, 2018, the Brazilian Reais exchange rate against the U.S. dollar was 3.9.

Had a hypothetical devaluation of 10% of the Brazilian Reais against the U.S. dollar occurred on June 30, 2018, the reported net assets in our Brazilian subsidiaries would have decreased by approximately $9.3 million with the related impact in Other Comprehensive Income. Additionally, we would have recorded a foreign exchange loss amounting to approximately $9.9 million in our Brazilian subsidiaries.

Interest

Our earnings and cash flows are also affected by changes in interest rates. These changes could have an impact on the interest rates that financial institutions charge us prior to the time we sell our MercadoPago receivables. As of June 30, 2018, MercadoPago’s receivables totaled $307.6 million. Interest rate fluctuations could also impact interest earned through our MercadoCredito solution. As of June 30, 2018, loans granted under our MercadoCredito solution totaled $112.1 million. Interest rate fluctuations could also negatively affect certain of our fixed rate and floating rate investments comprised primarily of time deposits, money market funds, investment grade corporate debt securities and sovereign debt securities. Investments in both fixed rate and floating rate interest earning products carry a degree of interest rate risk. Fixed rate securities may have their fair market value adversely impacted due to a rise in interest rates, while floating rate securities may produce less income than predicted if interest rates fall.

Under our current policies, we do not use interest rate derivative instruments to manage exposure to interest rate changes. As of June 30, 2018, the average duration of our available for sale securities, defined as the approximate percentage change in price for a 100-basis-point change in yield, was 1.9%. If interest rates were to instantaneously increase (decrease) by 100 basis points, the fair market value of our available for sale securities as of June 30, 2018 could decrease (increase) by approximately $0.2 million.

As of June 30, 2018, our short-term investments amounted to $69.4 million and our long-term investments amounted to $11.4 million. These investments can be readily converted at any time into cash or into securities with a shorter remaining time to maturity. We determine the appropriate classification of our investments at the time of purchase and re-evaluate such designations as of each balance sheet date.

Equity Price Risk

Our board of directors adopted the 2011 and 2012 long-term retention plans (the “2011 and 2012 LTRPs”, respectively), under which certain eligible employees receive awards (“LTRP Awards”), which are payable as follows:

---

 

Our board of directors, upon the recommendation of the compensation committee, approved the 2013, 2014, 2015, 2016, 2017 and 2018 Long Term Retention Plan (the “2013, 2014, 2015, 2016, 2017 and 2018 LTRPs”), respectively.

In order to receive an award under the 2013, 2014, 2015, 2016, 2017 and/or 2018 LTRP, each eligible employee must satisfy the performance conditions established by the Board of Directors for such employee. If these conditions are satisfied, the eligible employee will, subject to his or her continued employment as of each applicable payment date, receive the full amount of his or her 2013, 2014, 2015, 2016, 2017 and/or 2018 LTRP award, payable as follows:

At June 30, 2018, the total contractual obligation fair value of our 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014, 2015, 2016, 2017 and 2018 LTRP Variable Award Payment obligation amounted to $74.0 million. As of June 30, 2018, the accrued liability related to the 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014, 2015, 2016, 2017 and 2018 Variable Award Payment of the LTRP included in Salaries and Social security payable in our condensed consolidated balance sheet amounted to $36.6 million. The following table shows a sensitivity analysis of the risk associated with our total contractual obligation fair value related to the 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014, 2015, 2016, 2017 and 2018 LTRP Variable Award Payment if our common stock price per share were to increase or decrease by up to 40%:







 (*) Average closing stock price for the last 60 trading days of the closing date.

 

Item 4 — Controls and Procedures

We maintain disclosure controls and procedures that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in our reports pursuant to the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”) is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commission’s rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our chief executive officer and chief financial officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.



Evaluation of disclosure controls and procedures

Based on the evaluation of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) required by Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(b) or 15d-15(b), our chief executive officer and our chief financial officer have concluded that, as of the end of the period covered by this report, our disclosure controls and procedures were effective.

---

 



Changes in Internal Controls Over Financial Reporting

There were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting (as such term is defined in Rule 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act) during the six-month period ended June 30, 2018 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

 

PART II. OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1 — Legal Proceedings

See Item 1 of Part I, “Financial Statements—Note 7 Commitments and Contingencies—Litigation and other Legal Matters.”

 

Item 1A — Risk Factors



      We previously disclosed risk factors under "Item 1A. Risk Factors" in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2017. In addition to those risk factors and the other information included elsewhere in this report, you should also carefully consider the risk factors discussed below. The risks described below and in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2017 are not the only risks facing our company. Additional risks and uncertainties not currently known to us or that we deem to be immaterial also may materially adversely affect our business, financial condition and/or results of operations.

Our business, results of operations and financial condition are particularly sensitive to fluctuations in the currency exchange rate between the U.S. dollar and the Argentine Peso.

Our results of operations and financial condition are particularly sensitive to changes in the Argentine Peso/U.S. dollar exchange rate because a significant part of our operations are conducted in Argentina where our costs are incurred, for the most-part, in Argentine Pesos, while our consolidated financial statements are presented in U.S. dollars. Consequently, appreciation of the U.S. dollar relative to the Argentine Peso, to the extent not offset by inflation in Argentina, could result in unfavorable variations in our operating results and, conversely, depreciation of the U.S. dollar relative to the Argentine Peso could impact our operating results in a positive manner.

In recent years, the Argentine Peso has suffered significant devaluations against the U.S. dollar and has continued to devaluate against the U.S. dollar. As a result of this economic instability, Argentina's foreign debt rating has been downgraded on multiple occasions based upon concerns regarding economic conditions and rising fears of increased inflationary pressures. This uncertainty may also adversely impact Argentina's ability to attract capital.

The increasing level of inflation in Argentina has generated pressure for further depreciation of the Argentine Peso. After several years of relatively moderate variations in the nominal exchange rate, the Argentine Peso depreciated against the U.S. dollar by 32.6% in 2013, 31.2% in 2014, 52.1% in 2015, 21.9% in 2016, 18.4% in 2017 and 53.7% in the six-month period ended June 30, 2018, based on the official exchange rates published by the Argentine Central Bank.

The current Argentine government has set goals to reduce the primary fiscal deficit as a percentage of GDP over time, reduce the Argentine government’s reliance on Central Bank financing and has requested a financial assistance from International Monetary Fund. If despite of these measures, the current Argentine government is unable to address Argentina’s structural inflationary imbalances, the prevailing high rates of inflation may continue, which would have an adverse effect on Argentina’s economy.

Inflation in Argentina could increase our costs of operations and could impact our financial condition and results of operations. Inflation rates could increase further in the future, and there is uncertainty regarding the effects and effectiveness of those measures adopted, or that may be adopted in the future, by the Argentine government to control inflation

For accounting purposes, Argentina has been designated as a highly inflationary economy beginning July 1, 2018 because the three-year cumulative inflation rate exceeds 100%. For this reason, going forward, we will be required to account for the operations of our Argentine subsidiaries using the functional currency of MercadoLibre, Inc., which is the U.S. dollar, rather than the Argentine Peso as the functional currency.







---

 

We rely on local carriers to develop our shipping service and changes to our shipping fees, rules or practices may adversely affect our business.

We rely on local carriers in Brazil, Argentina, Mexico, Colombia, Chile and Uruguay to deliver items. We generally pay a fee to the carriers for this service and collect from our customers the fee for the services provided. From time to time, local carriers may increase their fees for each transaction. If we cannot transfer these increased fees to our customers, the resulting increase in operating costs of MercadoEnvios could generate net losses in our MercadoEnvios operations.

In addition, if these services are not available to us because of unfavorable contractual or commercial terms or for any other reason, we could lose our ability to provide shipping services to our customers, which could in turn have a material adverse effect on our shipping service, operating results, and financial condition. As a result, we could lose our ability to provide shipping services to our customers.

In May 2018, there was a nationwide truckers’ strike in Brazil in which truck drivers, dissatisfied by the increase in fuel prices, blocked roads throughout the country, preventing the delivery of goods and gasoline to Brazilian businesses.  The strike resulted in a general slowdown in commercial transactions, including those performed by users of our platforms during the strike.

Any future strike in Brazil or other country where MercadoEnvios operates or similar event may create political and economic uncertainty which could affect our business negatively.

---

 

 



Item 6 — Exhibits

The information set forth under “Index to Exhibits” below is incorporated herein by reference. 



MercadoLibre, Inc.

INDEX TO EXHIBITS

 







---

 

Signatures

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

 

 



---