Mr. Spector became President and Co-Chief Operating
Officer of the Company and Bear Stearns on June 25, 2001. From June 30, 1999 to June 24, 2001, Mr. Spector was an Executive Vice President of Bear
Stearns. Prior to June 30, 1999, Mr. Spector was an Executive Vice President of the Company and of Bear Stearns for more than the preceding five
years.
Mr. Tese has been Chairman of Wireless Cable
International Inc. for more than five years. Mr. Tese is currently Chairman of the Audit Committee, the Corporate Governance Committee and the
Qualified Legal Compliance Committee of the Board of the Company.
Mr. Williams had been a partner in the law firm of
Covington & Burling for more than five years prior to his retirement on January 1, 2005. He has been President and Chief Operating Officer since
2004, Co-President and Co-Chief Operating Officer from 2003 to 2004, and Co-Chairman and Co-Chief Executive Officer for more than five years, of
Lockhart Cos. Inc., a 24-company conglomerate of real estate, insurance, and consumer finance companies operating in the Eastern Caribbean. Prior to
his retirement on January 1, 2005, Mr. Williams had been Chairman from 2003 through 2004, Deputy Chairman from 2001 through 2002, and a member of the
Board of Directors for more than five years, of the Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond. Mr. Williams has also been Chairman since 2004, and a member of
the Board of Directors for more than five years, of the National Prostate Cancer Coalition.
There is no family relationship among any of the
directors or executive officers of the Company.
Board and Committees
The Board is currently comprised of 12 members. The
Board has determined that all eight of the Companys non-employee directors, constituting a majority of the Board, meet the independence standards
of NYSE Corporate Governance Standards Section 303A.02 and the Companys Director Independence Standards, which are attached as Exhibit D to this
Proxy Statement. The eight non-employee directors consist of Messrs. Bienen, Glickman, Harrington, Nickell, Novelly, Salerno, Tese and
Williams.
The Companys non-management directors have met
in regularly scheduled executive sessions without management throughout fiscal 2004. Mr. Tese has been appointed by the non-management directors to
serve as the presiding director of such sessions. Stockholders and other interested persons may contact the presiding director or the non-management
directors individually or as a group, by writing to the presiding director or to such director(s) in care of the Corporate Secretary, The Bear Stearns
Companies Inc., 383 Madison Avenue, 6th Floor, New York, New York 10179. Any such communications will be promptly distributed by the
Secretary to the presiding director or such individual director(s).
The Company has also adopted a procedure by which
stockholders may send communications as defined within Item 7(h) of Schedule 14A under the Exchange Act to one or more members of the Board by writing
to such director(s) or to the whole Board in care of the Corporate Secretary, The Bear Stearns Companies Inc., 383 Madison Avenue, 6th
Floor, New York, New York 10179. Any such communications will be promptly distributed by the Secretary to such individual director(s) or to all
directors if addressed to the whole Board.
The Board held six meetings (exclusive of committee
meetings) during fiscal 2004. The Board has established five committees whose functions and current members are described below. The Audit Committee,
Compensation Committee, Nominating Committee, Corporate Governance Committee and the Qualified Legal Compliance Committee (collectively, the
Board Committees) are committees of the Board and consist solely of members of the Board. In addition, there is an Executive Committee
which includes both members and non-members of the Board, but may function in a manner comparable to that of Board committees, under certain
circumstances as described below. During fiscal 2004, each current director attended 75% or more of the aggregate number of meetings of the Board and
Board Committees (including for this purpose, the Executive Committee) on which he served, that were held during his period of service. The
composition, purpose and responsibilities of each committee are set forth below.
Executive Committee. The
Executive Committee of the Company consists of Messrs. Cayne, Greenberg (Chairman), Mark E. Lehman (an Executive Vice President of the Company),
Molinaro, Schwartz and Spector. The Executive Committee normally met each week having held 110 meetings during fiscal 2004. The Executive Committee has
the authority between meetings of the Board to take action with respect to a variety of matters delegated by the Board that are considered to be in the
ordinary course of the Companys business.
- 8 -
Audit Committee. The Audit
Committee of the Board consists of Messrs. Bienen, Glickman, Novelly, Salerno, Tese (Chairman) and Williams. Messrs. Bienen and Williams were appointed
to the Audit Committee on September 22, 2004 after the Board reviewed their credentials and determined that their background and expertise would be
beneficial to the Audit Committee. The Board has determined that each member of the Audit Committee is an independent director as that term
is defined in NYSE Corporate Governance Standards Section 303A.02 and the Companys Director Independence Standards and meets the independence
requirements contained in Exchange Act Rule 10A-3(b)(1). In addition, the Board has determined that each member of the Audit Committee meets the NYSE
standards of financial literacy and accounting or related financial management expertise and the SEC criteria of an audit committee financial
expert. Pursuant to NYSE Corporate Governance Standards Section 303A.07, no director may serve as a member of the Audit Committee if he serves on
the audit committees of more than three other public companies unless the Board determines that such simultaneous service would not impair his ability
to serve effectively on the Audit Committee. The Board has determined that Mr. Salernos service on the audit committees of four of the five
public companies wherein he serves as a director (Popular, Inc., Consolidated Edison, Inc., Akamai Technologies, Inc. and Gabelli Asset Management
Inc.), as identified in his biography on page 6 of this Proxy Statement, does not impair his ability to serve effectively on the Companys
Audit Committee and that his continued service on the Audit Committee is in the best interest of the Company and its stockholders. The Audit Committee
is responsible for assisting the Board in their oversight of: the integrity of the financial statements of the Company; the Companys compliance
with legal and regulatory requirements; the qualifications, performance and independence of the Companys independent auditor(s); the performance
of the Companys internal audit function; and the Companys systems of disclosure controls and procedures, external financial reporting and
internal control over financial reporting. The Audit Committee is also directly and solely responsible for the appointment, retention, compensation,
oversight and termination of the Companys independent auditor(s) and for pre-approving all audit and permissible non-audit services to be
performed by the independent auditor(s). The Audit Committee held 14 meetings during fiscal 2004. The Audit Committee Report begins on page 13
of this Proxy Statement.
Compensation Committee. The
Compensation Committee of the Board consists of Messrs. Glickman (Chairman), Harrington, Nickell and Tese. The Board has determined that each member of
the Compensation Committee is an independent director as that term is defined in NYSE Corporate Governance Standards Section 303A.02 and
the Companys Director Independence Standards. The Compensation Committee establishes the compensation policies used in determining the
compensation of all executive officers and other Senior Managing Directors, including members of the Board who are employees of the Company. The
Compensation Committee administers the Performance Compensation Plan pursuant to which the salary and bonus compensation of certain Senior Managing
Directors (including the Chief Executive Officer and certain executive officers) of the Company is determined based upon an evaluation of the
performance of such individuals in relation to approved goals and objectives. The Compensation Committee also approves the salary and bonus
compensation of other executive officers and other Senior Managing Directors based upon recommendations made by the Executive Committee and the Bear,
Stearns and Co. Inc. Management and Compensation Committee, who are applying criteria established by the Compensation Committee. The Compensation
Committee also administers certain aspects of the CAP Plan, the Stock Award Plan and the Restricted Stock Unit Plan (the RSU Plan). In
addition, the Compensation Committee annually reviews the compensation process for equity research personnel. The Compensation Committee held nine
meetings during fiscal 2004. The Compensation Committee Report begins on page 14 of this Proxy Statement.
Nominating Committee. The
Nominating Committee of the Board consists of Messrs. Novelly, Salerno (Chairman) and Tese. Mr. Novelly was appointed to the Nominating Committee
effective April 28, 2004. The Board has determined that each member of the Nominating Committee is an independent director as that term is
defined in NYSE Corporate Governance Standards Section 303A.02 and the Companys Director Independence Standards.
The Nominating Committee makes recommendations to
the Board with respect to the size and composition of the Board and identifies potential candidates to serve as directors. The Nominating Committee
identifies Board candidates by introduction from management, members of the Board, employees or other sources and stockholders that satisfy the
Companys policy regarding stockholder recommended candidates. The Nominating Committee does not evaluate director candidates recommended by
stockholders differently than director candidates recommended by other sources. Stockholders wishing to submit recommendations for the 2006 Annual
Meeting should write to the Corporate Secretary, The Bear Stearns Companies Inc., 383 Madison Avenue, 6th Floor, New York, New York 10179.
Any such stockholder must meet and evidence the minimum eligibility requirements specified in Exchange
- 9 -
Act Rule 14a-8
and must submit, within the same timeframe for submitting a stockholder proposal
required by Rule 14a-8: (1) evidence in accordance with Rule 14a-8 of compliance with
the stockholder eligibility requirements, (2) the written consent of the candidate(s)
for nomination as a director, (3) a resume or other written statement of the
qualifications of the candidate(s) for nomination as a director, and (4) all information
regarding the candidate(s) and the submitting stockholder that would be required to be
disclosed in a proxy statement filed with the SEC if the candidate(s) were nominated for
election to the Board.
In considering Board candidates, the Nominating
Committee takes into consideration the Companys Board Candidate Guidelines, located in the Companys Corporate Governance Guidelines and
attached as Exhibit C to this Proxy Statement, the Companys policy regarding stockholder recommended director candidates, as set forth above, and
all other factors that they deem appropriate, including, but not limited to, the individuals character, education, experience, knowledge and
skills. The Nominating Committee will also consider the extent of the individuals experience in business, education or public service, his or her
ability to bring a desired range of skills, diverse perspectives and experience to the Board and whether the individual possesses high ethical
standards, a strong sense of professionalism and is capable of serving the interests of stockholders. Additionally, the Nominating Committee will
consider the number of boards that the candidate already serves on when assessing whether the candidate has the appropriate time to devote to Board
service. The Nominating Committee held three meetings during fiscal 2004.
Corporate Governance
Committee. The Corporate Governance Committee of the Board consists of Messrs. Nickell, Novelly and Tese (Chairman). The Board
has determined that each member of the Corporate Governance Committee is an independent director as that term is defined in NYSE Corporate
Governance Standards Section 303A.02 and the Companys Director Independence Standards. The purpose of the Corporate Governance Committee is to
develop and recommend a set of corporate governance guidelines for the Company; to make recommendations to the Board in support of such guidelines; to
take a leadership role in the shaping of the corporate governance of the Company; and to oversee the evaluation of the Board and management. The
Corporate Governance Committee held two meetings during fiscal 2004.
Qualified Legal Compliance
Committee. The Qualified Legal Compliance Committee of the Board (the QLCC) consists of Messrs. Bienen, Glickman,
Novelly, Salerno, Tese (Chairman) and Williams. Mr. Novelly was elected to the QLCC effective March 31, 2004. Messrs. Williams and Bienen were elected
to the QLCC effective September 22, 2004. The QLCC consists of at least one member of the Audit Committee and two or more members of the Board who are
not employed, directly or indirectly, by the Company, as required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and the rules promulgated thereunder. The purpose
of the QLCC is to receive, retain and investigate reports made by the Chief Legal Officer or an attorney appearing and practicing before the SEC in the
representation of the Company of evidence of material violations of any United States federal or state securities law, including any breach of
fiduciary duty by the Company, its officers, directors, employees or agents. The QLCC held one meeting during fiscal 2004.
Corporate Governance
The Company is committed to the highest level of
honesty, integrity and ethics. The Company regularly reviews its corporate governance policies in light of legal, regulatory and corporate governance
developments and complies with SEC, NYSE and other corporate governance regulatory requirements applicable to the Company.
Independent Directors. The
Company has established and adopted Corporate Governance Guidelines which set forth guidelines for the appointment, retention, term, responsibilities,
powers, qualifications and compensation regarding the Board and its committees. The Corporate Governance Guidelines (which include the Board Candidate
Guidelines attached as Exhibit C to this Proxy Statement) contain the formal director qualification and independence standards adopted by the Board.
The standards set forth the criteria by which director independence will be determined and include: prohibitions on material relationships with the
Company; limitations on employment of a director or his or her immediate family members with the Company; limitation on the receipt of direct
compensation from the Company; limitations on affiliation with the Companys auditors; and restrictions on commercial relationships. Audit
Committee members are further restricted from receiving any compensatory fee from the Company or any subsidiary thereof, other than in the
members capacity as a member of the Board or any committee thereof. The Board has determined that a majority of the members of the Board, and
each member
- 10 -
of the Audit Committee, Compensation Committee,
Nominating Committee, Corporate Governance Committee and QLCC, are independent under these standards.
The Companys non-management directors meet in
regularly scheduled executive sessions without management present in order to freely evaluate the performance of the Companys management. As
noted above, Mr. Tese has been appointed to serve as the presiding director at such executive sessions. In addition, the non-management directors
elected Mr. Tese as Lead Director of the Board. As Lead Director, Mr. Tese: presides at all Board meetings at which the chairman is not present,
including executive sessions of the non-management directors; serves as liaison between the chairman and the independent directors; approves
information sent to the Board; approves meeting agendas for the Board; approves meeting schedules to help ensure that there is sufficient time for
discussion of all agenda items; has the authority to call meetings of the independent directors; and, if requested by stockholders, is available for
consultation and direct communication.
As set forth above, the Company has adopted a
procedure for interested parties to communicate with the non-management directors and a procedure for stockholders to communicate with the Board. In
addition, to assure that members of the Board dedicate a sufficient amount of time to effectively serve the Company and its stockholders, the Company
has adopted a policy limiting the number of public boards of directors that a Company director may serve on. The Company believes that it is important
for members of the Board to attend the Annual Meetings of stockholders and therefore adopted a policy encouraging all directors to attend Annual
Meetings. Ten members of the Board attended the Companys 2004 Annual Meeting.
Director Orientation and Continuing
Education. The Company has established an orientation process for newly appointed directors. The orientation process consists of
familiarizing the director with the Company and its significant businesses, practices and personnel. It also includes educating the director regarding
the Companys financial reporting and risk management processes, any material litigation and the Companys Code of Business Conduct and
Ethics. In addition, supplemental continuing education information is prepared and forwarded to each director as necessary and
appropriate.
Annual Performance
Evaluations. The Board and each of the Board Committees conducted a self-evaluation. Accordingly, each Board Committee compared
its performance with the provisions of its charter, set forth its objectives for the upcoming year and if the committee deemed necessary or
appropriate, recommended changes to the Board. Each Board Committee reported the results of its evaluation to the Board. Furthermore, the Board
evaluated itself and its committees to determine whether they are functioning effectively and to determine whether any modifications were
necessary.
Audit Committee. The Board
has determined that all of the members of the Audit Committee meet the NYSE standards of financial literacy and accounting or related financial
management expertise and the SEC criteria of an audit committee financial expert. The Audit Committee operates under a formal charter,
which in accordance with NYSE listing standards addresses the purpose, duties and responsibilities, and requires an annual performance evaluation, of
the Audit Committee. A copy of the charter is attached as Exhibit A to this Proxy Statement.
Whistleblowing. The Company
has continued its long-standing practice of encouraging whistleblowing. Accordingly, the Audit Committee has established procedures to receive, retain
and treat complaints received regarding accounting, internal accounting controls or auditing matters and to allow for the confidential and anonymous
submission by employees of concerns regarding accounting or auditing matters. Additionally, the Company has reminded employees of its policy to not
retaliate or take any other detrimental action against employees who in good faith provide evidence of fraud.
Code of Business Conduct and
Ethics. All of the Companys employees, officers (including senior executive, financial and accounting officers) and
directors are held accountable for adherence to the Companys Code of Business Conduct and Ethics. The Code is intended to establish standards
necessary to deter wrongdoing and to promote compliance with applicable governmental laws, rules and regulations and honest and ethical conduct. The
Code covers all areas of professional conduct, including conflicts of interest, fair dealing, financial reporting and disclosure, protection of Company
assets and confidentiality. Employees have an obligation to promptly report any known or suspected violation of the Code without fear of retaliation.
Waiver of any provision of the Code for executive officers and directors may only be granted by the Board or one of its committees and any such waiver
of the Code relating to such individuals will be disclosed by the Company.
- 11 -
A copy of the Code is filed as an exhibit to the
Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K and is available on the Companys website at http://www.bearstearns.com. The website contains a
corporate governance page, located within the Corporate Governance section under the heading About Bear Stearns. Copies of the
Companys Corporate Governance Guidelines, Code, and the charters of each of the Audit Committee, Compensation Committee, Corporate Governance
Committee, Nominating Committee and QLCC are available on the website and may also be obtained by any stockholder upon request without charge by
writing to the Corporate Secretary, The Bear Stearns Companies Inc., 383 Madison Avenue, 6th Floor, New York, New York
10179.
- 12 -
AUDIT COMMITTEE REPORT
The members of the Audit
Committee have been appointed by the Board. The Audit Committee is comprised of six directors who each meet the independence and experience
requirements of the NYSE and the SEC criteria of an audit committee financial expert. The Audit Committee is governed by a charter
(attached as Exhibit A) which has been approved and adopted by the Board and is reviewed and reassessed annually by the Audit
Committee.
The following Audit Committee Report does not
constitute soliciting material and shall not be deemed filed or incorporated by reference into any other Company filing under the Securities Act of
1933, as amended (the Securities Act) or the Exchange Act, except to the extent the Company specifically incorporates this Audit Committee
Report by reference into any such filing.
The Audit Committee assists the Board in the
Boards oversight of (1) the integrity of the financial statements of the Company, (2) the Companys compliance with legal and regulatory
requirements, (3) the qualifications, performance and independence of the Companys independent auditor(s), (4) the performance of the
Companys internal audit function and (5) the Companys systems of disclosure controls and procedures, external financial reporting and
internal control over financial reporting.
Management is responsible for the preparation and
integrity of the Companys financial statements. The Audit Committee reviewed the Companys audited financial statements for the year ended
November 30, 2004 and met with both management and the Companys external auditors to discuss those financial statements, including the critical
accounting policies on which the financial statements are based. Management and the external auditors have represented to the Audit Committee that the
financial statements were prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
The Audit Committee has received from and discussed
with the external auditors their written disclosure and letter regarding their independence from the Company as required by Independence Standards
Board Standard No. 1. The Audit Committee also discussed with the external auditors any matters required to be discussed by Statement on Auditing
Standards No. 61.
Based upon these reviews and discussions, the Audit
Committee has recommended to the Board that the audited financial statements be included in the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year
ended November 30, 2004 for filing with the SEC.
AUDIT COMMITTEE
Henry S.
Bienen
Carl D. Glickman
Paul A. Novelly
Frederic V. Salerno
Vincent Tese, Chairman
Wesley S. Williams Jr.
- 13 -
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
COMPENSATION COMMITTEE REPORT
Compensation Policies
The Compensation Committee is empowered by the Board
and the stockholders to oversee the compensation programs of the Company with particular attention to the compensation of the executive officers of the
Company. The compensation philosophy of the Company has been strongly influenced by the principle that the compensation of the executive officers
should be structured to link their financial reward to the achievement of annual and long-term performance goals. Thus, executives would both share in
the success of the Company as a whole and be adversely affected by poor Company performance, thereby aligning their interests with the interests of the
stockholders. In making decisions with respect to the compensation of executive officers, the Compensation Committee follows certain
guidelines:
|
|
Total compensation should be comparable to that of the
Companys primary competitors, so that the Company may recruit and retain talented executive officers who are key to the Companys long-term
success. |
|
|
Executive compensation should be directly linked to the
Companys financial performance as measured annually, primarily through return on equity. |
|
|
A significant portion of the total compensation paid to
executive officers should be delivered in the form of equity-based awards. The value of equity-based awards cannot be realized immediately and depends
upon the future performance of the Company and an increase in the market value of its stock. |
To implement the foregoing philosophy, the salary
and bonus compensation of executive officers is determined principally by the operation of the Performance Compensation Plan.
Performance Compensation Plan
Under the Performance Compensation Plan, executive
officers, including the executive officers named in the Summary Compensation Table, and key employees receive a base salary of $200,000 per annum and a
share of a performance-based bonus pool. The Compensation Committee determines the formula for calculating one or more bonus pools within 90 days after
the beginning of each fiscal year based upon one or more of the following criteria, individually or in combination, adjusted in such manner as the
Compensation Committee shall determine: (a) pre-tax or after-tax return on common equity; (b) earnings per share; (c) pre-tax or after-tax net income;
(d) business unit or departmental pre-tax or after-tax income; (e) book value per share; (f) market price per share; (g) relative performance to peer
group companies; (h) expense management; and (i) total return to stockholders.
The share of one or more of the bonus pools to be
allocated to each executive officer in any fiscal year is determined by the Compensation Committee in its sole discretion. However, under no
circumstance may the aggregate amount of the bonuses paid under the Performance Compensation Plan exceed 100% of any of the applicable bonus pools
computed under the formula designated by the Compensation Committee. The maximum amount allocable to members of the executive committee of Bear,
Stearns & Co Inc. in the aggregate for any fiscal year is $165,000,000 (the Executive Committee Pool). The maximum allocation to any
individual member of the Executive Committee Pool is 30%. In fiscal 2004, the Executive Committee consisted of six members: the Companys Chief
Executive Officer, Chairman of the Executive Committee, Co-Presidents, Chief Financial Officer and an Executive Vice President.
In fiscal 2004, the Compensation Committee
determined that the formula used to calculate the Executive Committee Pool would be based on the Companys adjusted after-tax return on common
equity. The Compensation Committee decided to exercise its negative discretion under the Performance Compensation Plan and awarded total annual
compensation of $104,450,000, which was less than the aggregate bonus pool authorized under the terms of the Performance Compensation Plan. This amount
consisted of a combination of cash, CAP Units (as defined below under Equity Ownership and Capital Accumulation Plan) and stock options
(see Stock Award Plan). The participants in the Executive Committee Pool received 42.3% in cash, 20.0% in stock options and 37.7% in CAP
units. The Compensation Committee believes that this amount of equity-based compensation strengthens the
- 14 -
alignment of the interests of the executive
officers with those of all stockholders, as the ultimate realization of the benefits attributable to stock options only occurs with an increase in the
Companys stock price.
Equity Ownership and Capital Accumulation Plan
A focus on performance and growth and the direct
alignment of employee and stockholder interests flows from the substantial ownership of Common Stock and CAP Units by senior executives of the Company.
At January 31, 2005, the members of the Executive Committee beneficially owned 8.88% of the outstanding Common Stock, CAP Units and restricted stock
units combined.
All executive officers receive a substantial portion
of their annual compensation in awards made pursuant to the CAP Plan. In aggregate, 383,198 CAP Units were granted to the members of the Executive
Committee related to fiscal 2004. Stock units (CAP Units) awarded pursuant to the CAP Plan vest 50% on each of the second and third
anniversaries of the original grant date. After a five-year period, each officer will be entitled to receive from the Company a number of freely
transferable shares of Common Stock equal to the number of CAP Units then credited to such officers Capital Accumulation Account related to such
award.
Stock Award Plan
The Stock Award Plan was established in 1999 and
provides the Company the ability to award key employees stock options as a component of their annual compensation. The determination of recipients of
stock options, the terms and conditions of such options within the parameters of the Stock Award Plan, and the number of shares covered by each option
is determined by the Compensation Committee, based on managements recommendation.
In aggregate, 712,217 ten-year options were granted
to members of the Executive Committee relating to their performance in fiscal 2004. These options were granted with exercise prices equal to the fair
market value of the Common Stock on the date of grant and become exercisable after three years. The Compensation Committee believes that the award of
stock options is an important component in the compensation of executive officers, as the ultimate economic value of such awards can only be achieved
as a result of share price growth. As a result, the interests of executive officers are directly aligned with those of the
stockholders.
Compensation of Chief Executive Officer
The total compensation of Mr. Cayne, the
Companys Chief Executive Officer, along with other members of the Executive Committee, is determined in all respects by the Performance
Compensation Plan. Pursuant to the terms of the Performance Compensation Plan for fiscal 2004, Mr. Cayne received a base salary of $200,000 and shared
in a bonus pool based on the Companys fiscal 2004 after-tax return on common equity. Mr. Caynes proportionate share of the fiscal 2004
bonus pool (as well as that of the other members of the Executive Committee) was determined by the Compensation Committee in February 2004. Based upon
Mr. Caynes individual performance in fiscal 2004 and the performance of the Company, the Compensation Committee determined that Mr. Cayne would
receive total compensation in fiscal 2004 of $24,721,875 consisting of the following components (including 168,585 stock options):
Base Salary
|
|
|
|
Cash Bonus
|
|
CAP Units
|
|
Stock Options
|
|
Total
|
$200,000 |
|
|
|
$ |
10,081,291 |
|
|
$ |
9,496,209 |
|
|
$ |
4,944,375 |
|
|
$ |
24,721,875 |
|
Such compensation was less than that
which could have been awarded under the terms of the Performance Compensation Plan. The Compensation Committee believes that Mr.
Caynes fiscal 2004 compensation was fair given the Companys absolute performance and also its performance compared to its key competitors.
In fiscal 2004, the Company achieved exceptional results. Earnings per share for the year ended November 30, 2004 were a record $9.76 per share, an
increase of 15% from the prior year. Net income for fiscal 2004 was a record $1.34 billion, an increase of 16% when compared to fiscal 2003. Net
revenues for fiscal 2004 also reached a record level of $6.8 billion, an increase of 14% from the prior year. Annualized return on average common
equity for the year ended November 30, 2004 was 19.1%. Book value grew by more than $10 per share to $59.13 in fiscal 2004 and the stock increased by
35%. Over the same period, the Companys peer group shares rose an average of 4%. Due to the substantial portion of Mr.
Caynes compensation being delivered in the form of stock units and stock options, the ultimate realization of benefits from his current bonus
will depend on the future performance of the Company and the value of its Common Stock.
- 15 -
Tax Deductibility under Section 162(m)
Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986,
as amended, limits deductibility for federal income tax purposes of compensation in excess of $1,000,000 annually paid to individual executive officers
named in the Summary Compensation Table unless certain exceptions, including compensation based on performance goals, are satisfied. The Performance
Compensation Plan, the CAP Plan and the Stock Award Plan have been established and maintained in an effort to comply with the performance-based
exception to limits on deductibility of executive officer compensation. However, while the Compensation Committee currently seeks to maximize the
deductibility of compensation paid to executive officers, it will maintain the flexibility to take actions which may be based upon other
considerations.
Conclusion
The Compensation Committee believes that the Company
performed well in the current business environment. The Companys performance as measured by profit margins and earnings per share increased
significantly from the prior year and return on common equity was among the highest of its key competitors. Therefore, the compensation paid to the
Companys executive officers reflects the Companys strong absolute and relative performance. Attracting and retaining talented and motivated
management and employees is essential to creating long-term stockholder value. Offering a competitive performance-based compensation program with a
significant equity component helps to achieve this objective. The Compensation Committee believes that the Performance Compensation Plan, the CAP Plan
and the Stock Award Plan provide appropriate incentives to senior management of the Company and are fair and reasonable methods for determining the
compensation of executive officers, including the Chief Executive Officer. The compensation program of the Company properly serves to align the
interests of executives and stockholders.
COMPENSATION COMMITTEE
Carl
D. Glickman, Chairman
Donald J. Harrington
Frank T. Nickell
Vincent Tese
- 16 -
COMPENSATION TABLES AND OTHER INFORMATION
The following table sets forth information with
respect to the Chief Executive Officer and the four most highly compensated executive officers of the Company (other than the Chief Executive Officer)
for the fiscal years ended November 30, 2004, 2003 and 2002:
Summary Compensation Table
|
|
|
|
ANNUAL
COMPENSATION
|
|
LONG-TERM
COMPENSATION AWARDS
|
|
Name and
Principal Position
|
|
Fiscal
Year
|
|
Salary
|
|
Bonus
(1)
|
|
Restricted
Stock
Awards (2)(3)(4)
|
|
Securities
Underlying
Options (#)
|
|
All
Other
Compensation (5)
|
James
E. Cayne |
|
2004 |
|
$ |
200,000 |
|
|
$ |
10,081,291 |
|
|
$ |
9,496,209 |
|
|
|
168,585 |
|
|
$ |
6,482,057 |
Chairman
of the Board |
|
2003 |
|
|
200,000 |
|
|
|
11,009,432 |
|
|
|
10,419,633 |
|
|
|
256,143 |
|
|
|
12,296,347 |
and
Chief Executive Officer |
|
2002 |
|
|
200,000 |
|
|
|
10,006,750 |
|
|
|
7,982,583 |
|
|
|
68,000 |
|
|
|
10,178,600 |
|
Alan
C. Greenberg |
|
2004 |
|
$ |
200,000 |
|
|
$ |
5,933,750 |
|
|
$ |
5,383,750 |
|
|
|
98,176 |
|
|
$ |
1,737,163 |
Chairman
of the Executive |
|
2003 |
|
|
200,000 |
|
|
|
6,516,519 |
|
|
|
5,963,136 |
|
|
|
150,396 |
|
|
|
5,005,360 |
Committee |
|
2002 |
|
|
200,000 |
|
|
|
5,995,000 |
|
|
|
4,591,667 |
|
|
|
40,000 |
|
|
|
4,224,231 |
|
Samuel
L. Molinaro Jr. |
|
2004 |
|
$ |
200,000 |
|
|
$ |
5,736,500 |
|
|
$ |
4,961,500 |
|
|
|
92,895 |
|
|
$ |
1,307,296 |
Executive
Vice President |
|
2003 |
|
|
200,000 |
|
|
|
5,300,765 |
|
|
|
4,538,107 |
|
|
|
116,582 |
|
|
|
776,663 |
and
Chief Financial Officer |
|
2002 |
|
|
200,000 |
|
|
|
4,332,500 |
|
|
|
3,027,500 |
|
|
|
30,000 |
|
|
|
406,524 |
|
Alan
D. Schwartz |
|
2004 |
|
$ |
200,000 |
|
|
$ |
9,596,080 |
|
|
$ |
8,948,920 |
|
|
|
159,784 |
|
|
$ |
5,400,154 |
President
and Co-Chief |
|
2003 |
|
|
200,000 |
|
|
|
10,486,887 |
|
|
|
9,836,524 |
|
|
|
242,307 |
|
|
|
9,032,967 |
Operating
Officer |
|
2002 |
|
|
200,000 |
|
|
|
9,537,500 |
|
|
|
7,475,833 |
|
|
|
65,000 |
|
|
|
7,452,512 |
|
Warren
J. Spector |
|
2004 |
|
$ |
200,000 |
|
|
$ |
9,563,562 |
|
|
$ |
8,981,438 |
|
|
|
159,784 |
|
|
$ |
17,378,312 |
President
and Co-Chief |
|
2003 |
|
|
200,000 |
|
|
|
10,429,968 |
|
|
|
9,874,471 |
|
|
|
243,207 |
|
|
|
17,750,992 |
Operating
Officer |
|
2002 |
|
|
200,000 |
|
|
|
9,493,592 |
|
|
|
7,519,741 |
|
|
|
65,000 |
|
|
|
13,921,316 |
(1) |
|
Represents amounts payable under the Performance Compensation
Plan. See Executive Compensation Compensation Committee Report Performance Compensation Plan. |
(2) |
|
Represents the portion of the named executive officers
bonus deferred pursuant to the CAP Plan. See Executive Compensation Compensation Committee Report Equity Ownership and Capital
Accumulation Plan. |
(3) |
|
As of December 31, 2004, the value and the aggregate number of
CAP Units in the accounts of each named person (based on the closing price of the Common Stock on the Consolidated Transaction Reporting System on
December 31, 2004) was: Mr. Cayne $88,932,760 (869,247 units); Mr. Greenberg $36,384,958 (355,634 units); Mr. Molinaro $25,646,234
(250,671 units); Mr. Schwartz $76,816,698 (750,822 units); and Mr. Spector $97,875,187 (956,653 units). |
(4) |
|
On December 11, 2000, Mr. Molinaro received restricted stock
units as part of his compensation pursuant to the Performance Compensation Plan. Mr. Molinaros grant was $788,021, which represents 15,879
restricted stock units. Dividend equivalents of additional restricted stock units are payable by the Company on all such holdings from the date of
grant. On June 30, 2004, Mr. Molinaro vested into and received a distribution of 5,489 restricted stock units, which represented 33 1/3% of the units
originally granted plus all related dividend equivalents through the vesting date. The remaining restricted stock units will vest on June 30,
2005. |
(5) |
|
Represents preferential earnings paid in the form of CAP Units
pursuant to the CAP Plan that exceed cash dividends paid on the equivalent shares of Common Stock. |
- 17 -
Option Grants in Last Fiscal Year(1)
Name
|
|
|
|
Number of Securities Underlying Options Granted
|
|
% of Total Options Granted to Employees in Fiscal Year
|
|
Exercise Price Per Share
|
|
Expiration Date (2)
|
|
Grant Date Present Value (3)
|
James E.
Cayne |
|
|
|
|
168,585 |
|
|
|
3.89 |
% |
|
$ |
102.65 |
|
|
|
12/28/14 |
|
|
$ |
4,944,375 |
|
Alan C.
Greenberg |
|
|
|
|
98,176 |
|
|
|
2.26 |
% |
|
|
102.65 |
|
|
|
12/28/14 |
|
|
|
2,879,375 |
|
Samuel L.
Molinaro Jr. |
|
|
|
|
92,895 |
|
|
|
2.14 |
% |
|
|
102.65 |
|
|
|
12/28/14 |
|
|
|
2,724,500 |
|
Alan D.
Schwartz |
|
|
|
|
159,784 |
|
|
|
3.68 |
% |
|
|
102.65 |
|
|
|
12/28/14 |
|
|
|
4,686,250 |
|
Warren J.
Spector |
|
|
|
|
159,784 |
|
|
|
3.68 |
% |
|
|
102.65 |
|
|
|
12/28/14 |
|
|
|
4,686,250 |
|
(1) |
|
Represents awards made in December 2004 for performance in
fiscal year 2004. |
(2) |
|
All stock options become exercisable three years after grant
date. |
(3) |
|
Valued using a modified Black-Scholes option pricing model. The
exercise price of each stock option ($102.65) is equal to the closing price on the Consolidated Transaction Reporting System of a share of Common Stock
on December 27, 2004, the date immediately preceding the date of the grant. The assumptions used for the variables in the model were: 23.50% volatility
(a projection of the volatility of the Common Stock over the 120 month term of the options); a 4.24% risk-free rate of return (based on the USD
Interest Rate Swap Curve, expressed as a zero-coupon rate over the 120 month term); a 1.45% dividend yield (which was an estimated projected dividend
yield on the date of grant); and a ten year option term (which is the maximum term of the options). A discount was applied to the option value yielded
by the model to reflect the non-marketability of the options. The actual gain, if any, that executives will realize on their stock options will depend
on the future price of the Common Stock and cannot be accurately forecasted by application of an option pricing model. |
Aggregated Stock Option Exercises Made in Last Fiscal Year
and Fiscal
Year-End Option Values
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Underlying Unexercised Options at Fiscal Year-End
|
|
In-the-Money Options at Fiscal Year-End (1)
|
|
Name
|
|
|
|
Shares Acquired on Exercise
|
|
Value Realized
|
|
Exercisable (2)
|
|
Unexercisable
|
|
Exercisable
|
|
Unexercisable
|
James E.
Cayne |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
211,864 |
|
|
|
492,728 |
|
|
$ |
10,725,717 |
|
|
$ |
8,387,328 |
|
Alan C.
Greenberg (3) |
|
|
|
|
66,475 |
|
|
$ |
1,759,261 |
|
|
|
18,702 |
|
|
|
288,572 |
|
|
|
761,171 |
|
|
|
4,927,137 |
|
Samuel L.
Molinaro Jr. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
43,053 |
|
|
|
239,477 |
|
|
|
2,011,977 |
|
|
|
3,785,549 |
|
Alan D.
Schwartz |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
172,788 |
|
|
|
467,091 |
|
|
|
8,701,445 |
|
|
|
7,956,876 |
|
Warren J.
Spector |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
202,400 |
|
|
|
467,991 |
|
|
|
10,247,191 |
|
|
|
7,978,323 |
|
(1) |
|
This valuation represents the difference between $97.58, the
closing price of a share of Common Stock reported on the Consolidated Transaction Reporting System on November 30, 2004 and the exercise prices of
those stock options outstanding at November 30, 2004 multiplied by the number of options outstanding at each exercise price. The actual value, if any,
that executives will realize upon the exercise of any option will depend upon the difference between the exercise price of the option and the market
price of the Common Stock on the date the option is exercised. |
(2) |
|
Includes options that vested and became exercisable on December
17, 2004. |
(3) |
|
In addition, Mr. Greenberg also exercised and sold 18,702
options on January 3, 2005, which represented the options that vested on December 17, 2004. |
- 18 -
Compensation of Directors
In fiscal 2004, each director who was not an
employee of the Company received an annual retainer of $50,000, plus $1,500 for each meeting of the Board attended, and reasonable expenses relating to
attendance at such meetings. No increases to these amounts have been proposed for fiscal 2005. Directors who are members of the Audit Committee,
Compensation Committee, Nominating Committee, Corporate Governance Committee and QLCC receive additional compensation at the rate of $1,500 for each
meeting of the Audit Committee, Compensation Committee, Nominating Committee, Corporate Governance Committee and QLCC attended, with the exception of
telephone conference committee meetings for which the compensation paid for participation is $200.
Pursuant to the provisions of the Directors
Plan, each of the directors of the Company who is not an officer or employee of the Company or any of its subsidiaries (the Non-Employee
Directors) as of the date of an annual meeting of stockholders and whose service will continue after such meeting is granted an option to
purchase shares of Common Stock and a number of restricted stock units. The exercise price of an option is equal to the closing price of the Common
Stock on the NYSE on the date the grant is made. The number of shares covered by the option and the number of restricted stock units is equal to the
quotient of an amount determined by the Executive Committee divided by the average closing price of the Common Stock for the five trading days
immediately preceding the date of such meeting, subject to adjustment as provided in the Directors Plan. The options have a ten-year term, are
exercisable six months from the date of grant and are subject to termination upon the occurrence of certain events as provided in the Directors
Plan.
Pursuant to the annual grant provisions of the
Directors Plan, all of the Companys Non-Employee Directors at March 31, 2004 received stock options valued at $42,500 in fiscal 2004. In
addition, each Non-Employee Director at March 31, 2004 received restricted stock units valued at $42,500 in fiscal 2004. On February 9, 2005, the Board
approved the following changes to fees paid to the Companys non-employee directors. The Board felt that these changes were appropriate to reflect
both the additional time commitments required of directors as a result of legislative and regulatory developments as well as to maintain the
Companys ability to attract qualified directors in light of the director fees paid by the Companys competitors. The annual grant made
pursuant to the Directors Plan will be increased from $42,500 to $67,500 in value of options to purchase shares of Common Stock and from $42,500
to $67,500 in value of restricted stock units, beginning on April 7, 2005. The increase in value of grants of stock options and restricted stock units
is the first since fiscal 2002. In addition, the Company also instituted the payment of annual fees to the Chairman of the Audit Committee ($25,000),
the Chairman of the Compensation Committee ($10,000) and the Lead Director ($20,000). These additional fees will be paid on a quarterly basis
commencing April 7, 2005. The Directors Plan also permits Non-Employee Directors to elect to receive options or shares of Common Stock in
exchange for up to one-half of the annual cash retainer paid by the Company for services rendered as a director.
- 19 -
PERFORMANCE GRAPH
The following performance graph compares the
performance of an investment in the Companys Common Stock over the last five fiscal years with its Peer Group, the S&P 500 Investment Banking
& Brokerage Index and the S&P 500 Index. The entities included in the Companys peer group consist of Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc.,
Morgan Stanley, The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. and Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc. The performance graph assumes the value of the investment in the
Companys Common Stock and each index was $100 on November 26, 1999, and that all dividends have been reinvested. There can be no assurance that
the Companys future stock performance will correlate with past stock performance.
COMPARISON OF FIVE-YEAR CUMULATIVE TOTAL RETURN
Assumes $100
invested on November 26, 1999 in the Companys Common Stock, Peer Group, S&P 500 Investment Banking & Brokerage Index and the S&P 500
Index and that all dividends have been reinvested.
|
|
|
|
1999
|
|
2000
|
|
2001
|
|
2002
|
|
2003
|
|
2004
|
The Bear
Stearns Companies Inc. |
|
|
|
$ |
100.00 |
|
|
$ |
116.00 |
|
|
$ |
146.77 |
|
|
$ |
165.04 |
|
|
$ |
188.90 |
|
|
$ |
256.93 |
|
Peer Group
(1) |
|
|
|
|
100.00 |
|
|
|
116.94 |
|
|
|
114.21 |
|
|
|
102.14 |
|
|
|
129.21 |
|
|
|
134.90 |
|
S&P 500
Investment Banking & Brokerage Index |
|
|
|
|
100.00 |
|
|
|
117.05 |
|
|
|
98.88 |
|
|
|
83.05 |
|
|
|
102.10 |
|
|
|
105.06 |
|
S&P 500
Index |
|
|
|
|
100.00 |
|
|
|
93.92 |
|
|
|
82.44 |
|
|
|
68.83 |
|
|
|
79.21 |
|
|
|
89.40 |
|
(1) |
|
In fiscal year 2000, The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. was added to
the Peer Group. The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. is not included in results for 1999. |
- 20 -
CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
Certain Transactions
The Company, in the ordinary course of business, has
extended credit to certain of its directors, officers and employees in connection with their purchase of securities. Such extensions of credit have
been made on substantially the same terms (including as to interest rates and collateral requirements) as those prevailing at the time for comparable
transactions with non-affiliated persons, except that for some credit products, the interest rates charged were equivalent to the lowest of the
interest rates charged to other persons or were the same as those charged to Company employees and did not involve more than the normal risk of
collectability or have unusual terms or conditions which are disadvantageous to the Company. To the extent that officers and employees of the Company
and members of their immediate families wish to purchase securities in brokerage transactions, they ordinarily are required to do so through Bear
Stearns, which offers them a discount from its standard commission rates that could be substantial depending on various factors, including the size of
the transaction. Bear Stearns periodically, in the ordinary course of its business, enters into transactions, as principal, involving the purchase or
sale of securities and commercial paper (including different forms of repurchase transactions) with directors, officers, employees of the Company and
members of their immediate families. Such purchases and sales of securities or commercial paper on a principal basis are effected on substantially the
same terms as similar transactions with unaffiliated third parties.
The Company, from time to time, has made loans to
its executive officers and other employees. All loans outstanding between the Company and any of its directors or executive officers on and after July
30, 2002, including those discussed in this section, have been in existence without material modification since such date or are otherwise exempt from
the prohibitions of Section 13(k) of the Exchange Act. The Company has formed several limited partnerships which provide investment opportunities for
the Companys key employees. For certain of the partnerships, the Company provides nonrecourse, interest-bearing loans to the participants. The
loans bear interest at the London Interbank Offered Rate (LIBOR) plus 1.0% or 1.75%, depending on the partnership. At November 30, 2004, in
aggregate for these partnerships, the total amounts loaned in excess of $60,000 to directors and executive officers are as follows: James E. Cayne
($231,706), Jeffrey M. Farber (Controller of the Company) ($92,682), Mark E. Lehman ($231,706), Michael Minikes (Treasurer of the Company) ($185,364),
Samuel L. Molinaro Jr. ($185,364), Alan D. Schwartz ($231,706) and Warren J. Spector ($811,963). The partnerships made distributions during fiscal 2004
to the participants. The total amounts distributed in excess of $60,000 to directors and executive officers in fiscal 2004 were as follows: Mr. Cayne
($93,941), Mr. Schwartz ($93,941) and Mr. Spector ($291,941). These distributions are net of amounts used to repay principal and interest on the
nonrecourse, interest-bearing loans to the participants. For the fiscal year ended November 30, 2004, in aggregate for these
partnerships, the total amounts used to repay loan principal and interest for the aforementioned participants were as follows: Mr. Cayne ($203,062),
Mr. Schwartz ($203,062) and Mr. Spector ($364,813).
Mr. Cayne and his wife own in excess of 10% of the
limited partnership interests in Colden Capital Partners L.P. (Colden). The managing partner of Colden is Colden Capital Management LLC,
the managing member of which is a son-in-law of the Caynes. Colden is a prime brokerage client of Bear Stearns and as such it is eligible to receive a
wide variety of services from Bear Stearns which include clearing services and the use of office space. All transactions between Colden and Bear
Stearns are conducted in the ordinary course of business and on terms comparable with transactions of unrelated third parties. During the fiscal year
ended November 30, 2004, Colden received net interest income of $376,702 from Bear Stearns. In addition, during the fiscal year ended November 30,
2004, Colden and its affiliates paid Bear Stearns $265,350 in clearance fees and charges.
Mr. Novellys adult son, Paul A. Novelly II,
had been employed as an Account Executive in the Private Client Services department of Bear Stearns since September 1990. During fiscal 2004, he earned
total compensation of $281,902 which was commission-based. Effective February 21, 2005, Paul A. Novelly II resigned from his position with Bear
Stearns.
Since January 2003, in order to facilitate their
service as directors and committee members, the Company has had a policy of making office space and administrative services available to each member of
the Board. During fiscal 2004, both Mr. Glickman and Mr. Tese have utilized office space. The Company also provided the services of an
administrative assistant to Mr. Tese in order to support him in his role as Lead Director of the Board
- 21 -
and
Chairman of the Audit Committee. Mr. Tese reimburses the Company for the
proportionate cost of such services attributable to non-Company matters. During fiscal 2004 such costs amounted to $36,000.
Other than as described in this Proxy Statement, no
director or executive officer of the Company was indebted to the Company during fiscal 2004 for any amount in excess of $60,000.
Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation
The current members of the Companys
Compensation Committee are Messrs. Glickman, Harrington, Nickell and Tese, none of whom is or has been an officer or an employee of the Company. There
were no Compensation Committee Interlocks during fiscal 2004.
Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance
Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act requires the
Companys officers and directors, and any persons who own more than 10% of the Companys Common Stock, to file reports of initial ownership
of the Common Stock and subsequent changes in that ownership with the SEC and furnish the Company with copies of all forms they file pursuant to
Section 16(a). Based solely upon a review of the copies of the forms furnished to the Company, or written representations from certain reporting
persons that no Form 5s were required, the Company believes that during fiscal 2004 all Section 16(a) filing requirements were complied with, except as
set forth in this paragraph due to an administrative error. Mr. Lehman, an executive officer of the Company, made one late filing on Form 4 to report
one transaction involving the transfer of common stock, five transactions involving the transfer of units under the CAP Plan and five transactions
involving the transfer of employee stock options, all pursuant to terms of a property settlement agreement. All of the transactions that were not
reported on a timely basis were transactions that are exempt from potential liability for short-swing profits under Section
16(b).
- 22 -
EQUITY COMPENSATION PLAN INFORMATION
The following table provides information as of
November 30, 2004 with respect to the Companys Common Stock that may be issued under its existing equity compensation plans. The table shows the
number of securities to be issued under compensation plans that have been approved by stockholders and those that have not been so approved. The
footnotes and other information following the table are intended to provide additional detail on the compensation plans. The Company currently plans to
mitigate the dilutive effect to stockholders through the repurchase of Common Stock, pursuant to the Companys share repurchase program, subject
to market conditions.
Plan category
|
|
|
|
Number of securities to be issued upon exercise of
outstanding options, warrants and rights
|
|
Weighted-average exercise price of outstanding options,
warrants and rights (1)
|
|
Number of securities remaining available for future issuance
under equity compensation plans (excluding securities reflected in column (a))
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
(b) |
|
(c) |
Equity
compensation plans approved by security holders |
|
|
|
|
65,406,154 |
(2) |
|
$ |
67.94 |
(2) |
|
|
15,204,375 |
(3) |
Equity
compensation plans not approved by security holders |
|
|
|
|
1,609,042 |
(4) |
|
|
N/A |
|
|
|
|
(4) |
Total |
|
|
|
|
67,015,196 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,204,375 |
|
(1) |
|
This column contains information regarding stock options only;
there are no warrants or rights outstanding. |
(2) |
|
Includes stock options to purchase 23,401,445 shares of Common
Stock at a weighted-average exercise price of $67.94, 33,257,567 CAP units, 8,733,802 restricted stock units under the RSU Plan as well as 13,340
restricted stock units under the Directors Plan. |
(3) |
|
Equity compensation plans approved by security holders include
the Stock Award Plan, Directors Plan, RSU Plan and CAP Plan. The material features of each of these plans are described in Note 13, Stock
Compensation Plans, to the Companys Consolidated Financial Statements. Includes stock options to purchase 9,862,935 shares
of Common Stock available under the Stock Award Plan as well as stock options to purchase 193,102 shares of Common Stock available under the
Directors Plan. Includes 5,148,338 securities remaining available for future issuance under the RSU Plan. Units
available for future issuance under the CAP Plan, which was approved by security holders, are not included. Pursuant to the terms of the CAP Plan, the
total number of CAP units that may be issued under the CAP Plan during any fiscal year may not exceed 15% of the sum of issued and outstanding shares
of Common Stock and CAP units outstanding determined as of the last day of the current fiscal year. |
(4) |
|
Equity compensation plans not previously approved by security
holders include the Long-Term Incentive Stock Award and AE Investment and Deferred Compensation Plan. The material features of these arrangements are
described below. |
The table above does not include
equity compensation plans that meet the qualification requirements of Section 401(a) of the Internal Revenue Code, namely the Profit Sharing Plan,
401(k) Savings Plan and the Employee Stock Ownership Plan. The material features of the Long-Term Incentive Stock Award and AE Investment and Deferred
Compensation Plan are described below. These descriptions do not purport to be complete and are qualified in their entirety by reference to the plan
documents which are included as exhibits to the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended November 30, 2004.
- 23 -
Long-Term Incentive Stock Award
On November 30, 2000, the Company issued a one time
award of Restricted Stock Units to certain existing employees. These units were scheduled to vest over a four and one-half year period. There were
1,162,632 Restricted Stock Units outstanding at November 30, 2004.
AE Investment and Deferred Compensation Plan
The AE Investment and Deferred Compensation Plan is
a non-qualified defined contribution retirement plan covering substantially all account executives. The plan allows participants to defer a portion of
their annual compensation in a variety of self-directed investment options. One of these options allows the participants to invest in the Common Stock
of the Company. Such investments are restricted from sale, transfer or assignment until the end of the restricted period which is predetermined prior
to the original deferral. As of November 30, 2004 the total number of such units outstanding was 446,410.
- 24 -
II. APPROVAL OF AMENDMENTS TO THE
PERFORMANCE COMPENSATION PLAN
General
The
Performance Compensation Plan was adopted by the Compensation Committee on
September 10, 1996, and was originally approved by stockholders at the 1996
Annual Meeting. The Performance Compensation Plan was amended thereafter on a
number of occasions by the Compensation Committee, both with and without
stockholder approval, as required. The purpose of the Performance Compensation
Plan is to compensate Senior Managing Directors of the Company and its
subsidiaries for significant contributions to the Company and to stimulate their
efforts by giving them a direct interest in the performance of the Company.
Proposed
Amendments to Performance Compensation Plan
The
Performance Compensation Plan provides for two separate bonus pools that cover
the annual compensation of (i) members of the executive committee of Bear
Stearns, including the Chief Executive Officer of the Company and Bear Stearns,
and (ii) certain other members of senior management who are not members of the
executive committee. The Annual Bonus Pool for the members of the executive
committee had a maximum amount payable of $165,000,000 and a maximum percentage
allocation for any individual from this pool of 30%. The proposed amendment does
not affect this Annual Bonus Pool and therefore will not affect the compensation
of the members of the executive committee.
The
Annual Bonus Pool related to participants who are not members of the executive
committee has been specifically designed to enable the compensation payable to
such participants to be deductible under Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue
Code of 1986, as amended. In fiscal 2004, the Annual Bonus Pool for participants
who were not members of the executive committee was $65.8 million for eight
participants while the actual compensation paid to such participants was $29.7
million in the aggregate. The actual compensation paid was based on the
evaluation of each of these participants by the Compensation Committee based
upon a number of factors, including individual performance, the overall
performance of the Company and competitor information. Although there was a
limit on the maximum amount allocable to any individual, there was no limit on
the overall size of this Annual Bonus Pool or on the number of participants. The
Compensation Committee determined that a maximum limit should be placed on the
Annual Bonus Pool for participants who are not members of the executive
committee to facilitate greater consistency between these two Annual Bonus Pools
in the future.
On
February 9, 2005, the Compensation Committee adopted amendments to the
Performance Compensation Plan, subject to stockholder approval at the Annual
Meeting. The proposed amendments to the Performance Compensation Plan would
amend Section 5.5 to remove the maximum amount of $15,000,000 allocable to any
individual participant who is not a member of the executive committee and would
create a new Section 5.6 which would establish $140,000,000 as the maximum
amount that could be awarded under the Annual Bonus Pool for participants who
are not members of the executive committee. In addition, Section 6.1 is proposed
to be amended by replacing the previous 30% maximum for any individual
participant in the Annual Bonus Pool related to members of the executive
committee with a 30% maximum for any individual participant in any Annual Bonus
Pool.
Set
forth below is the text of the revised Section 5.5, new Section 5.6 and revised
Section 6.1 of the Performance Compensation Plan containing the amendments being
proposed at the Annual Meeting. The amendments are qualified in their entirety
by reference to such text.
|
Section
5.5. The maximum amount allocable by the Compensation Committee to the Annual Bonus
Pool related to Participants who are members of the executive committee of Bear, Stearns
& Co. Inc. in the aggregate for any fiscal year shall not exceed $165,000,000. |
|
Section
5.6. The maximum amount allocable to any Annual Bonus Pool related to Participants who
are not members of the executive committee of Bear, Stearns & Co. Inc. in the
aggregate for any fiscal year shall not exceed $140,000,000. |
|
Section
6.1. Prior to the commencement of each fiscal year, or not later than 90 days after
the commencement of each fiscal year, the Compensation Committee shall determine in
writing, by resolution |
- 25 -
|
of
the Compensation Committee or other appropriate action, each Participants
proportionate share of any Annual Bonus Pool for such fiscal year, which shall not
exceed 30%. |
Description
of the Performance Compensation Plan, as amended and restated
Stockholders
are encouraged to review the Performance Compensation Plan carefully. This
summary of the material terms of the Performance Compensation Plan is qualified
in its entirety by reference to Exhibit B.
The
Performance Compensation Plan is administered by the Compensation Committee.
Subject to the provisions of the Performance Compensation Plan, the Compensation
Committee shall have the power to interpret the Performance Compensation Plan,
to determine all questions arising thereunder, and to adopt and amend such rules
and regulations as it may deem desirable. Any decision of the Compensation
Committee in the administration of the Performance Compensation Plan shall be
final and conclusive.
The
Performance Compensation Plan is effective until the period ending November 30,
2008. All of the Companys Senior Managing Directors (approximately 840
individuals), including executive officers, are eligible to participate in the
Performance Compensation Plan. The Compensation Committee is required to
designate those Senior Managing Directors who are participating in the
Performance Compensation Plan (the Participants) within 90 days
after the beginning of each fiscal year. Under the terms of the Performance
Compensation Plan, each of the Participants receives a base salary of $200,000
per annum and also shares in one or more performance-based bonus pools. The
Compensation Committee determines the formula for calculating one or more bonus
pools within 90 days after the beginning of each fiscal year based upon one or
more of the following criteria, individually or in combination, adjusted in such
manner as the Compensation Committee shall determine: (a) pre-tax or after-tax
return on equity; (b) earnings per share; (c) pre-tax or after-tax net income;
(d) business unit or departmental pre-tax or after-tax income; (e) book value
per share; (f) market price per share; (g) relative performance to peer group
companies; (h) expense management; and (i) total return to stockholders.
The
share of one or more of the bonus pools to be allocated to each Participant in
any fiscal year will be determined by the Compensation Committee, in its sole
discretion. However, under no circumstance may the aggregate amount of the
bonuses paid under the Performance Compensation Plan exceed 100% of the bonus
pools computed under the formula designated by the Compensation Committee as
described above. The Compensation Committee, in its sole discretion, may reduce
the amount of the bonus of any Participant. The maximum amount allocable by the
Compensation Committee to the Annual Bonus Pool related to Participants who are
members of the executive committee of Bear Stearns in the aggregate for any
fiscal year shall not exceed $165,000,000 and each Participants share of
such pool shall not exceed 30%. Pursuant to the proposed amendments to the
Performance Compensation Plan, the maximum amount allocable by the Compensation
Committee to the Annual Bonus Pool related to Participants who are not members
of the executive committee of Bear Stearns in the aggregate for any fiscal year
shall not exceed $140,000,000 and each Participants share of such pool
shall not exceed 30%. The Performance Compensation Plan may be amended, or
terminated in whole or in part, by the Compensation Committee, provided that no
such action may retroactively impair or otherwise adversely affect the rights of
any Participant prior to the date of such action.
Since
the amounts payable under the Performance Compensation Plan in future years will
be based on future performance, such amounts are not determinable at the present
time. While the proposed amendments could have affected the size of the Annual
Bonus Pool related to the Participants who were not members of the executive
committee, it would not have affected the amount of compensation paid to these
Participants in fiscal 2004 due to the significant negative discretion already
exercised by the Compensation Committee in determining their annual
compensation. In addition, since the proposed amendments do not affect the
Annual Bonus Pool related to the members of the executive committee there would
have been no effect on compensation paid to members of the executive committee
under the Performance Compensation Plan during fiscal 2004 had the proposed
amendments been in effect.
- 26 -
The
following table is provided to reflect the amounts that were paid to the named
individuals and groups under the Performance Compensation Plan for the fiscal
year ended November 30, 2004, in accordance with the disclosure requirements of
Item 10 of Schedule 14A:
Performance Compensation Plan
Group or Individual
|
|
|
|
Dollar Value ($)(1)
|
|
James E.
Cayne, Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer |
|
|
|
|
24,721,875 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Alan C.
Greenberg, Chairman of the Executive Committee |
|
|
|
|
14,396,875 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Samuel L.
Molinaro Jr., Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |
|
|
|
|
13,622,500 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Alan D.
Schwartz, President and Co-Chief Operating Officer |
|
|
|
|
23,431,250 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Warren J.
Spector, President and Co-Chief Operating Officer |
|
|
|
|
23,431,250 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All current
executive officers as a group (9 persons) |
|
|
|
|
116,246,250 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All current
directors who are not executive officers as a group |
|
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All employees
(who are not executive officers) as a group |
|
|
|
|
22,750,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Includes amounts that would have been payable as bonuses under
the Performance Compensation Plan and bonus compensation that would have been deferred pursuant to the CAP Plan. See Summary Compensation
Table Annual Compensation Bonus, and Long Term Compensation Awards Restricted Stock Awards and Securities Underlying
Options. |
|
|
For information with respect to securities authorized for
issuance under the Companys equity compensation plans, see Equity Compensation Plan Information. |
The Board of Directors recommends a vote
FOR approval of the amendments to the Performance Compensation Plan.
- 27 -
III. RATIFICATION OF SELECTION OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS
The Audit Committee has appointed Deloitte &
Touche LLP as the Companys independent auditors to conduct the audit of the Companys books and records for the fiscal year ending November
30, 2005. Deloitte & Touche LLP also served as the Companys independent auditors for the previous fiscal year. Representatives of Deloitte
& Touche LLP are expected to be present at the Annual Meeting to respond to questions and to make a statement should they so
desire.
The affirmative vote of a majority of the shares of
Common Stock represented at the meeting and entitled to vote is required for the ratification of the appointment of Deloitte & Touche LLP as our
independent auditors. The Audit Committee is directly responsible for the appointment and retention of the Companys independent auditors.
Although ratification by stockholders is not required by our organizational documents or other applicable law, the Audit Committee has determined that
requesting ratification by stockholders of its selection of Deloitte & Touche LLP as our independent auditors is a matter of good corporate
practice. If stockholders do not ratify the selection, the Audit Committee will reconsider whether or not to retain Deloitte & Touche LLP, but may
still retain them. Even if the selection is ratified, the Audit Committee, in its discretion, may change the appointment at any time during the year if
it determines that such a change would be in the best interest of the Company and its stockholders.
The Board recommends a vote FOR
ratification of the appointment of Deloitte & Touche LLP as the Companys independent auditors for the fiscal year ending November 30,
2005.
FEES PAID
TO INDEPENDENT AUDITORS
The fees described below were paid to Deloitte &
Touche LLP, the member firms of Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu, and their respective affiliates (collectively, the Deloitte Entities), which
include Roundarch, Inc., a majority owned subsidiary of Deloitte Consulting.
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Year Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004
|
|
2003
|
|
|
|
|
(In millions) |
|
Audit
Fees |
|
|
|
$ |
8.1 |
|
|
$ |
5.8 |
|
Audit-Related
Fees |
|
|
|
|
7.9 |
|
|
|
5.7 |
|
Tax
Fees |
|
|
|
|
4.8 |
|
|
|
2.9 |
|
All Other
Fees |
|
|
|
|
2.3 |
|
|
|
1.4 |
|
Audit and Audit-Related Fees
aggregated $16.0 million and $11.5 million for the years ended November 30, 2004 and 2003, respectively and were composed of the
following:
Audit Fees
The aggregate fees billed by Deloitte Entities for
professional services rendered for the audit of the Companys annual financial statements for the fiscal year ended November 30, 2004, for the
reviews of the financial statements included in the Companys Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q for that fiscal year, other statutory and regulatory
filings and comfort letters and consents related to registration statements filed with the SEC for the 2004 fiscal year were $8.1 million. The
comparative amount for the fiscal year ended November 30, 2003 was $5.8 million.
Audit-Related Fees
In addition to Audit Fees, Deloitte Entities have
billed the Company $7.9 million, in the aggregate, for Audit-Related Fees related to assurance and related services. These services include, among
others, accounting and internal control consultations, reports in connection with data verification relating to securitization activities as well as
services to the Companys triple-A rated derivative subsidiaries. The comparative amount for the fiscal year ended November 30, 2003 was $5.7
million.
- 28 -
Other fees were composed of the
following:
Tax Fees
Deloitte Entities have billed the Company $4.8
million, in the aggregate, for services rendered to the Company for tax compliance, tax planning and advice related to debt structures and
transactions. Deloitte Entities billed $2.9 million for Tax Fees in the 2003 fiscal year. Included within these amounts are tax compliance fees of $1.9
million and $1.5 million for the 2004 and 2003 fiscal year, respectively.
All Other Fees
The aggregate fees billed by Deloitte Entities for
services rendered to the Company, other than the services described above under Audit Fees, Audit-Related Fees and Tax Fees, for the fiscal year ended
November 30, 2004 and 2003 were approximately $2.3 million and $1.4 million, respectively. The aggregate fees for All Other Fees in fiscal 2004 and
2003 included consulting services of which $2.0 million and $1.2 million, respectively, related to the design of the Companys
websites.
__________________________________
Fund and Other Fees
The Company offers investment products, including
money market, equity, fixed income and merchant banking funds (Funds). Deloitte Entities provide audit and other services to certain of
these Funds. The aggregate fees billed by Deloitte Entities for such services in fiscal 2004 and 2003 were approximately $1.3 million and $1.7 million,
respectively.
In connection with its merchant banking activities,
the Company had significant investments in various entities. Deloitte Entities received fees of approximately $1.2 million for the audits of four of
these entities in fiscal 2004 and approximately $0.9 million for the audits of three of these entities in fiscal 2003.
AUDIT
COMMITTEES PRE-APPROVAL POLICIES AND PROCEDURES
Consistent with SEC policies regarding auditor
independence, the Audit Committee (the Committee) has responsibility for appointing, setting compensation and overseeing the work of the
independent auditors. In recognition of this responsibility, the Committee has established a policy to review and pre-approve all audit,
internal-control related and permissible non-audit services provided by the independent auditors. These services may include audit services,
audit-related services, internal-control related services, tax services and other services.
Prior to engagement of the independent auditors, the
Committee shall pre-approve all audit services and all permitted non-audit services (including the estimated fees), except those excluded from
requiring pre-approval based upon the de minimus exception set forth in Section 10A(i)(1)(b) of the Exchange Act. The Committee also
specifically pre-approves any engagement of the independent auditors to provide internal-control related services.
In applying the pre-approval policies described
above with respect to audit services and permitted non-audit services, the following procedures are followed: (a) prior to each fiscal year, the
Committee pre-approves a schedule of estimated fees for proposed non-prohibited audit and non-audit services; (b) actual amounts paid are monitored by
financial management of the Company and reported to the Committee; and (c) between Committee meetings, the Committee has authorized Mr. Tese to
pre-approve (subject to certain limitations) additional non-prohibited services. Pre-approvals granted between Committee meetings are reported by Mr.
Tese to the Committee at its next regular meeting.
All work performed by Deloitte Entities as described
above under the captions Audit Fees, Audit-Related Fees, Tax Fees and All Other Fees has been approved or pre-approved by the Committee pursuant to the
provisions of the Committee charter attached as Exhibit A to this Proxy Statement. The Committee has considered and concluded that the provision of
non-audit services is compatible with maintaining the principal accountants independence.
OTHER
MATTERS
At the date of this Proxy Statement, the Company has
no knowledge of any business other than that described above that will be presented at the Annual Meeting. If any other business should properly come
before the Annual
- 29 -
Meeting in connection therewith, it is intended
that the persons named in the enclosed proxy will have discretionary authority to vote the shares which they represent.
SUBMISSION OF STOCKHOLDER PROPOSALS FOR THE 2006 ANNUAL MEETING
In accordance with rules promulgated by the SEC, any
stockholder who wishes to submit a proposal for inclusion in the proxy material to be distributed by the Company in connection with the 2006 Annual
Meeting must do so no later than November 7, 2005.
In addition, in accordance with Article VI, Section
2 of the Restated Certificate of Incorporation, in order to be properly brought before the 2006 Annual Meeting, a matter must have been: (1) specified
in a written notice of such meeting (or any supplement thereto) given to the stockholders by or at the direction of the Board (which would be
accomplished if a stockholder proposal were received by the Secretary of the Company as set forth in the preceding paragraph); (2) brought before such
meeting at the direction of the Board or the Chairman of the meeting,; or (3) specified in a written notice given by or on behalf of a stockholder of
record on the record date for such meeting or a duly authorized proxy for such stockholder, which conforms to the requirements of Article VI, Section 2
of the Restated Certificate of Incorporation and is delivered personally to, or mailed to and received by, the Secretary of the Company at the address
below not less than 10 days prior to the first anniversary of the date of the notice accompanying this Proxy Statement; provided, however, that such
notice need not be given more than 75 days prior to the 2006 Annual Meeting. Accordingly, any written notice given by or on behalf of a stockholder
pursuant to the foregoing clause (3) in connection with the 2006 Annual Meeting must be received no later than February 25, 2006.
STOCKHOLDERS SHARING AN ADDRESS
Stockholders who share a single address and who have
so consented are receiving only a single copy of our annual report and proxy statement. This practice, known as householding, is designed
to reduce the Companys printing and mailing costs. Stockholders may request or discontinue householding, or may request a separate copy of the
annual report or proxy statement, by following the instructions below:
|
|
Stockholders may consent to householding as provided on the
enclosed proxy card or pursuant to the instructions provided when voting via the internet or by telephone. |
|
|
Stockholders who wish to change or revoke their consent should
contact ADP Investor Communication Services at (800) 542-1061 or by writing to them at Householding Department, 51 Mercedes Way, Edgewood, New York
11717. |
|
|
Any householded stockholder may request prompt delivery of a
copy of the Companys annual report or proxy statement by contacting the Company at (212) 272-2000 or by writing to the Investor Relations
Department of the Company at 383 Madison Avenue, New York, New York 10179. |
ELECTRONIC VOTING AND ACCESS TO PROXY MATERIALS
Stockholders whose shares are registered in their
own names may vote by mailing a completed proxy card, via the internet or by telephone. Instructions for voting via the internet or by telephone are
set forth on the enclosed proxy card. If your shares are registered in the name of a bank or brokerage firm you will receive instructions from your
holder of record that must be followed in order for the record holder to vote the shares per your instructions. Votes submitted via the internet or by
telephone must be received by 11:59 p.m. Eastern Daylight Time, on April 6, 2005. If internet or telephone voting is unavailable from your bank or
brokerage firm, please complete and return the enclosed voting instruction card in the addressed, postage paid envelope provided.
You may revoke or change a previously delivered
proxy card at any time before the meeting by delivering another proxy with a later date or by sending written notice of revocation of your proxy to the
Secretary of the Company before the beginning of the meeting. A vote via the internet or by telephone may be revoked by executing a later-dated proxy
card or subsequently voting via the internet or by telephone. Regardless of the manner in which you vote, you may also revoke your proxy vote by
attending the meeting and voting in person, although attendance at the meeting will not in and of itself revoke a valid proxy that was previously
delivered.
- 30 -
Stockholders who have so consented may receive the
Companys annual report and proxy statement over the internet. Stockholders owning shares through a bank, broker or other holder of record should
contact the record holder for information regarding electronic delivery of materials. An election to receive materials over the internet will remain in
effect for all future annual meetings unless revoked. Stockholders consenting to electronic delivery or voting may incur costs, such as telephone and
internet access charges, that must be borne by the stockholder. Stockholders who elect to access proxy materials on the internet may request prompt
delivery of the Companys annual report or proxy statement by contacting the Company at (212) 272-2000 or by writing to the Investor Relations
Department of the Company at 383 Madison Avenue, New York, New York 10179.
REPORTS
The Company will furnish without charge to each
person whose proxy is being solicited, upon the written request of any such person, a copy of the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the
fiscal year ended November 30, 2004, as filed with the SEC, including the financial statements and schedules thereto. Requests for copies of such
Annual Report on Form 10-K should be directed to the Investor Relations Department of the Company at the address below. This Proxy Statement and
the Companys 2004 Annual Report to Stockholders and Annual Report on Form 10-K are also available on the Companys website at http://www.bearstearns.com. The 2004 Annual Report to Stockholders, Annual Report on Form 10-K and information on the website other than the Proxy
Statement, are not part of the Companys proxy soliciting materials.
By order of the Board of Directors
Kenneth L. Edlow,
Secretary
The Bear Stearns Companies Inc.
383 Madison Avenue
New York, New York
10179
March 7, 2005
- 31 -
[This Page Intentionally Left Blank.]
EXHIBIT A
THE BEAR STEARNS COMPANIES INC.
AUDIT COMMITTEE OF THE BOARD OF
DIRECTORS
CHARTER
Purpose
The Audit Committee (the Committee) is a
committee of the Board of Directors (the Board) of The Bear Stearns Companies Inc. (the Corporation). The purpose of the
Committee is to assist the Board in the Boards oversight of (1) the integrity of the financial statements of the Corporation, (2) the
Corporations compliance with legal and regulatory requirements, (3) the qualifications, performance and independence, of the Corporations
independent auditor(s) (the Auditor(s)), (4) the performance of the Corporations internal audit function and (5) the
Corporations systems of disclosure controls and procedures, external financial reporting and internal control over financial
reporting.
Membership
The Committee shall consist of at least three
directors of the Corporation. Committee members shall be appointed annually by the Board and may be removed with or without cause by action taken by a
majority of the whole Board. Each member of the Committee shall be an independent director of the Corporation as that term is defined by
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (the Act), Section 10A(m)(3) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange
Act), the rules of the New York Stock Exchange (the NYSE) and any other law, rule or regulation applicable to the Corporation and as
determined by the Board. At least one Committee member shall have accounting or related financial management expertise, as required by the
NYSE listing standards and as the Board determines in its business judgment. All Committee members shall be financially literate (or must become
financially literate within a reasonable time after his or her appointment to the Committee), as such qualification is determined by the Board and at
least one member of the Committee shall qualify as an audit committee financial expert as that term is defined in the Act and the rules
promulgated thereunder and as determined by the Board.
Committee members shall not serve simultaneously on
the audit committees of more than three public companies without the approval of the full Board.
Responsibilities
The Committees responsibilities include:
A) |
|
Financial Statement/Reporting Related: |
1. |
|
Review with management and the Auditor(s): |
(a) |
|
Analyses prepared by management and/or the Auditor(s) setting
forth significant financial reporting issues and judgments made in connection with the preparation of the financial statements, including analyses of
the effects of alternatives to generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP), adopted during the current year, on the Corporations financial
statements; and |
(b) |
|
the effect of material regulatory and accounting initiatives, as
well as off-balance sheet structures, on the financial statements of the Corporation. |
2. |
|
Meet with management and the Auditor(s) to review and discuss
the Corporations annual audited financial statements and quarterly financial statements, including reviewing the Corporations specific
disclosures under Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, and recommend to the Board
that the audited financial statements be included in the Corporations Form 10-K. |
3. |
|
Ensure review by the Auditor(s) of the Corporations
interim financial information prior to the filing of the Corporations Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. |
4. |
|
Review with management and the Auditor(s) major issues regarding
accounting principles and financial statement presentations, including: |
A-1
(a) |
|
any significant or major changes in the Corporations
selection or application of accounting principles and practices; |
(b) |
|
any major issues as to the adequacy of the Corporations
internal controls, including those that could significantly affect the Corporations financial statements; |
(c) |
|
any special audit steps adopted in light of material control
deficiencies; and |
(d) |
|
the adequacy of disclosures about changes in internal control
over financial reporting, if any. |
5. |
|
Review and discuss with management, including the senior
internal auditing executive, and the Auditor(s), managements annual report on internal control over financial reporting and the Auditor(s)
attestation of the report prior to the filing of the Corporations Annual Report on Form 10-K. |
6. |
|
Discuss generally (i.e., the types of information to be
disclosed and the type of presentation to be made) the Corporations earnings press releases, as well as financial information and earnings
guidance provided to analysts and rating agencies, particularly any use of proforma or adjusted non-GAAP
information. |
7. |
|
Discuss, and meet with management as necessary to review, the
Corporations policies regarding risk assessment and risk management, including the Corporations major financial risk exposures and the
steps management has taken to monitor and control such exposures. |
8. |
|
Review regularly with the Auditor(s) any audit problems or
difficulties encountered in the course of the audit work (and managements response thereto), including: |
(a) |
|
any restrictions on the scope of the Auditor(s) activities
or on access to requested information; |
(b) |
|
any significant disagreements with management, including issues
regarding financial reporting; |
(c) |
|
any accounting adjustments that were noted or proposed by the
Auditor(s) but were passed on; |
(d) |
|
any communications between the audit team and the
Auditor(s) national office regarding auditing or accounting issues presented by the engagement; and |
(e) |
|
other material written communications between the Auditor(s) and
the Corporations management, such as any management or internal control letter issued, or proposed to be issued, by the
Auditor(s) to the Corporation. |
9. |
|
Request that the Auditor(s) performing the Corporations
audit timely report to the Committee the following: |
(a) |
|
all critical accounting policies and practices to be used;
and |
(b) |
|
all alternative treatments of financial information within GAAP
that have been discussed with the Corporations management, potential ramifications of their use, and the treatment preferred by the
Auditor(s). |
10. |
|
Request and review the disclosures required to be made quarterly
to the Committee and the Auditor(s) by the officers certifying the Corporations periodic reports filed under Sections 13(a) and 15(d) of the
Exchange Act regarding: |
(a) |
|
all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the
design or operation of internal controls; |
(b) |
|
any fraud that involves management or other employees who have a
significant role in the Corporations internal controls; |
(c) |
|
any significant changes in internal controls or in other factors
that could significantly affect internal controls; and |
(d) |
|
any corrective actions taken with regard to such deficiencies
and weaknesses. |
11. |
|
Discuss with the Auditor(s) the matters required to be discussed
by Statement on Auditing Standards No. 61 relating to the conduct of the audit. Such review should include: any changes required in the planned scope
of the audit and any matters communicated by the Auditor(s) to management which the Auditor(s) view as material weaknesses and reportable conditions of
material inadequacies as those terms are generally understood by the accounting profession or regulators. |
A-2
12. |
|
Review legal matters that may have a material impact on the
financial statements, accounting policies, the Corporations compliance policies and internal controls, including any whistleblower complaints or
published reports with the Corporations General Counsel. |
B) |
|
Oversight of External Auditor(s): |
1. |
|
Be directly and solely responsible for the appointment,
retention and termination, compensation and oversight of the Auditor(s) (including resolution of disagreements, if any, between the Auditor(s) and
management) engaged to prepare or issue an audit report on the Corporations financial statements or perform other audit, review or attest
services for the Corporation, and if applicable, subject to shareholder ratification. |
2. |
|
Have the authority to approve all audit engagement fees and
terms of the Auditor(s), who shall report directly to the Committee. |
3. |
|
Review and pre-approve all audit, review, attest, internal
control-related and non-audit services not prohibited by the Act (as codified in Section 10A(g) of the Exchange Act) and the rules promulgated
thereunder to be provided by the Auditor(s) (except those non-audit services that satisfy the de minimus exception set forth in Section 10A(i)
of the Exchange Act). |
4. |
|
Review the Auditor(s) responsibilities, budget and
staffing. |
5. |
|
At least annually, evaluate the qualifications, performance and
independence of the Auditor(s), including the lead partner of the audit, after gathering information from management and those responsible for
performing the internal audit function and present the results of such evaluation to the Board. |
6. |
|
At least annually, obtain and review a report by the Auditor(s)
describing: |
(a) |
|
the Auditor(s) internal quality-control procedures; |
(b) |
|
any material issues raised by the most recent internal
quality-control review, or peer review, of the Auditor(s), or by any inquiry or investigation by governmental or professional authorities within the
preceding five years, regarding one or more audits carried out by the Auditor(s), and any steps taken to deal with such issues; and |
(c) |
|
all relationships between the Auditor(s) and the
Corporation. |
7. |
|
Confirm that the Corporations chief executive officer,
controller, chief financial officer, chief accounting officer, or any person serving in an equivalent position for the Corporation, were not previously
employed by the Auditor(s) and did not participate, as an employee of the Auditor(s), in the Corporations audit during the one-year period
preceding the date of the initiation of the audit and, if necessary, take appropriate action regarding the Auditor(s), including removal and
replacement. |
8. |
|
Periodically review the Auditor(s) to assure that the audit
partners as that term is defined in the Act and the rules promulgated thereunder have not performed audit services for the Corporation in any of the
years prohibited by applicable laws and regulations and, if necessary, take appropriate action regarding the Auditor(s), including removal and
replacement. |
1. |
|
Review with the Auditor(s) the responsibilities, budget and
staffing of the Corporations internal audit function prior to the audit. |
2. |
|
Review the appointment and replacement of the senior internal
auditing executive. |
3. |
|
Review the Internal Audit Departments responsibility,
budget and staffing with the senior internal auditing executive. |
4. |
|
Review significant reports to management prepared by the
Internal Audit Department and managements responses thereto, if any. |
A-3
D) |
|
Oversight of the Corporations Compliance
Function: |
1. |
|
Monitor the Corporations compliance function and review
with the General Counsel and management the adequacy and effectiveness of the Corporations procedures to ensure compliance with legal and
regulatory requirements. |
2. |
|
Establish procedures for the receipt, retention and confidential
treatment of complaints received by the Corporation regarding accounting, internal accounting controls or auditing matters and the confidential,
anonymous submission by employees of the Corporation of concerns regarding questionable accounting or auditing matters. |
3. |
|
Establish clear hiring policies for employees and former
employees of the Auditor(s), which polices shall meet the requirements of applicable law and NYSE listing standards. |
4. |
|
Review with the full Board any issues that arise with respect to
the quality or integrity of the Corporations financial statements, the Corporations compliance with legal and regulatory requirements, the
performance and independence of the Auditor(s) and the performance of the internal audit function. |
5. |
|
Review annually the Corporations Research
Departments budgeting and expense allocation process in compliance with the requirements of Section 1.5 of Addendum A to the global research
settlement to which Bear, Stearns & Co. Inc is a party. |
6. |
|
Obtain from the Auditor(s) assurance that Section 10A(b) of the
Exchange Act has not been implicated. |
7. |
|
Receive and discuss reports from management annually or as
necessary relating to: |
(a) |
|
Anti-money laundering and fiduciary compliance; |
(b) |
|
Business resumption and contingency planning; |
(c) |
|
Tax developments and issues; |
(d) |
|
Fraud and operating losses; |
(e) |
|
Technology and information security; |
(f) |
|
Insurance coverage of the Corporation and its subsidiaries;
and |
(g) |
|
Internal controls and risk management procedures relating to
complex structured finance activities. |
1. |
|
Prepare the report required by the rules of the SEC to be
included in the Corporations annual proxy statement and any other required reports. |
2. |
|
Review and reassess the adequacy of this Charter as necessary,
but not less than annually, and recommend any proposed changes to the Board for approval. |
3. |
|
Ensure inclusion of this Charter in the Corporations
annual proxy statement at least once every three years or as required by SEC rules. |
4. |
|
Meet separately, periodically, with management, with those
responsible for the internal audit function and the Auditor(s). |
5. |
|
Report regularly to the Board. |
Committee Structure and Operations
A majority of the Committee shall constitute a
quorum. The Board shall designate a member of the Committee as its chairman. The Committee may act by a majority vote of the members present at a duly
constituted meeting of the Committee. In the absence or disqualification of a member of the Committee, the members present, whether or not they
constitute a quorum, may unanimously appoint another independent member of the Board to act at the meeting in the place of an absent or disqualified
member. In the event of a tie vote on any issue voted upon by the Committee, the Committee chairmans vote shall decide the issue. The
Committee shall meet in person or telephonically at least four times a year at a time and place determined by the Committee chairman, with
additional
A-4
meetings called when deemed necessary or desirable by the
Committee or its chairman. The Committee shall make regular reports to the Board. The Committee shall have the authority to retain and pay legal,
accounting or other advisors as it deems necessary, at the Corporations expense, to fulfill its duties. The Corporation shall provide for
appropriate funding, as determined by the Committee, for payment of compensation to the Auditor(s) for the purpose of rendering or issuing an audit
report or performing other audit, review or attest services and to any advisors employed by the Committee and for ordinary administrative expenses of
the Committee that are necessary or appropriate in carrying out its duties. The Committee shall have the authority to delegate to one or more members
of the Committee the authority to preapprove audit and permitted non-audit services. Such members must report grants of preapproval to the full
Committee at its next scheduled meeting. In addition, the Committee may ask members of management or others whose advice and counsel are relevant to
the issues then being considered by the Committee to attend a Committee meeting and to provide such pertinent information as may be requested by the
Committee.
Annual Performance Evaluation
Each year, the Audit Committee shall conduct a
self-evaluation. In this regard, the Committee shall compare its performance with the provisions of this Charter, set forth its objectives for the
following year and recommend to the Board changes to the Charter, when deemed appropriate or necessary by the Committee.
General
The Committee shall have and may exercise all
powers, authority and responsibilities as the Board shall determine and as may be properly granted to the Committee under the laws of the State of
Delaware and the Corporations Certificate of Incorporation and By-laws. While the Committee has the responsibilities and powers set forth in this
Charter, it is not the duty of the Committee to plan or conduct audits or to determine that the Corporations financial statements are complete
and accurate and are presented fairly in accordance with GAAP. This is the responsibility of management as to the Corporations financial
statements and the Auditor(s) as to the plan, extent and execution of the audit. Furthermore, it is not the duty of the Committee to assure compliance
with laws and regulations.
Approved by the Audit Committee on December 16, 2004
Approved by the Board of
Directors on January 5, 2005
A-5
EXHIBIT B
THE BEAR STEARNS COMPANIES INC.
PERFORMANCE COMPENSATION
PLAN
(Amended and Restated as of February 9, 2005)
Section
1. Purpose. The purposes of The Bear Stearns Companies Inc. Performance Compensation Plan, as amended and
restated (the Plan) are (i) to compensate certain Senior Managing Directors of The Bear Stearns Companies Inc. and its subsidiaries (the
Company) on an individual basis for significant contributions to the Company and (ii) to stimulate the efforts of such persons by giving
them a direct interest in the performance of the Company.
Section
2. Term. The Plan became effective as of July 1, 1998 (the Effective Date). The Plan shall be
extended and shall be applicable for an additional period commencing July 1, 2003 and ending November 30, 2008, unless earlier terminated by the
Company pursuant to Section 9.
Section
3. Coverage. For purposes of the Plan, the term Participant shall include for each fiscal
year each Senior Managing Director so designated by the Compensation Committee within 90 days following the first day of such fiscal
year.
Section 4. Base
Salary.
4.1. Each Participant shall
receive a salary of $200,000 per annum (Base Salary). The Base Salary of the Participants may be increased from time to time by the
Compensation Committee of the Board (the Compensation Committee) by amendment of the Plan pursuant to Section 9.
4.2. Notwithstanding the
provisions of Section 4.1 above, in the event a Participant is not a Senior Managing Director for an entire fiscal year, his Base Salary for such
fiscal year shall be computed by multiplying such Base Salary as computed under Section 4.1 by a fraction, the numerator of which is the number of days
in such fiscal year during which such Participant was a Senior Managing Director and the denominator of which is the number of days in the fiscal year.
Any Base Salary shall be in addition to any base salary payable with respect to periods during the fiscal year in which a Participant was not a Senior
Managing Director.
Section 5. Annual Bonus
Pools.
5.1. For each fiscal year of
the Company, each Participant shall be entitled to receive an award of a bonus (the Bonus), payable from one or more annual bonus funds
(the Annual Bonus Pools) in an amount not to exceed the amount provided for in Section 6. A Bonus under the Plan shall be the sole bonus
payable with respect to a fiscal year to each Participant (Full Year Participant) who was a Senior Managing Director on the date that
proportionate shares of the Annual Bonus Pools for such fiscal year were determined by the Compensation Committee and who remains a Senior Managing
Director at all times thereafter during such fiscal year. For each fiscal year, each Participant who was not a Full Year Participant shall be entitled
to such a Bonus, if any, for the portion of such fiscal year not covered by the Plan, determined in accordance with the procedures applicable to
employees who are not Senior Managing Directors, in addition to the Bonus, if any, payable pursuant to the Plan.
5.2. For each fiscal year,
the formula for calculating the Annual Bonus Pools shall be determined by the Compensation Committee in writing, by resolution of the Compensation
Committee or other appropriate action, not later than 90 days after the commencement of such fiscal year. Such formula shall be based upon one or more
of the following criteria, individually or in combination, adjusted in such manner as the Compensation Committee shall determine: (a) pre-tax or
after-tax return on equity; (b) earnings per share; (c) pre-tax or after-tax net income; (d) business unit or departmental pre-tax or after-tax income;
(e) book value per share; (f) market price per share; (g) relative performance to peer group companies; (h) expense management; and (i) total return to
stockholders.
5.3. As a condition to the
right of a Participant to receive any Bonus under this Plan, the Compensation Committee shall first be required to certify in writing, by resolution of
the Compensation Committee or other appropriate action, that the Bonus has been accurately determined in accordance with the provisions of this
Plan.
5.4. The Compensation
Committee shall have the right to reduce the Bonus of any Participant in its sole discretion at any time and for any reason prior to the certification
of the Bonus otherwise payable to such Participant pursuant to Section 5.3 hereof.
B-1
5.5. The maximum amount
allocable by the Compensation Committee to the Annual Bonus Pool related to Participants who are members of the executive committee of Bear, Stearns
& Co. Inc. in the aggregate for any fiscal year shall not exceed $165,000,000.
5.6. The maximum amount allocable to any Annual Bonus Pool related to
participants who are not members of the executive committee of Bear, Stearns & Co. Inc. in the aggregate for any fiscal year shall not exceed
$140,000,000.
Section
6. Allocations.
6.1. Prior to the
commencement of each fiscal year, or not later than 90 days after the commencement of each fiscal year, the Compensation Committee shall determine in
writing, by resolution of the Compensation Committee or other appropriate action, each Participants proportionate share of any Annual Bonus Pool
for such fiscal year, which shall not exceed 30%.
6.2. Notwithstanding anything
in Section 6.1 to the contrary, any Participant who ceases to be a Senior Managing Director for any reason prior to the end of such fiscal year shall
be entitled to a Bonus computed as follows: A Bonus first shall be computed as if such Participant had been a Senior Managing Director for the full
fiscal year, and such Bonus then shall be multiplied by a fraction the numerator of which shall be the number of days in the fiscal year through the
date the Participant ceased to be a Senior Managing Director and the denominator of which shall be the number of days in the fiscal year; provided,
however, that if the application of the preceding clause would cause the total Bonuses payable under the Plan to exceed the Annual Bonus Pools, the
Bonuses payable to each Participant shall be reduced pro rata, so that the total of all Bonuses shall equal the Annual Bonus Pools. If a
Participant ceases to be a Senior Managing Director after the end of the fiscal year in respect of which such Bonus is payable, the amounts thereof
nonetheless shall be payable to him or his estate, as the case may be.
6.3. Except as hereinafter
provided, Bonuses for a fiscal year shall be payable as soon as practicable following the certification thereof by the Compensation Committee for such
fiscal year. In its discretion, the Compensation Committee may authorize, prior to the final determination of Participants Bonuses for such
fiscal year, payments on account of Bonuses payable hereunder to one or more Participants entitled to such Bonuses, (a) during the last month of such
fiscal year, in an amount not exceeding 95% of the aggregate amount that would be payable to such Participant or Participants hereunder as determined
by the Controller or Chief Accounting Officer of the Company (so long as he is not a Participant) on the basis of his good faith estimate, (b) during
the last ten calendar days of such fiscal year or after the end of such fiscal year, in an amount not to exceed 98% of the aggregate amount that would
be payable to such Participant or Participants hereunder as determined by the Controller or Chief Accounting Officer of the Company (so long as he is
not a Participant) on the basis of his good faith estimate, and (c) at any time during such fiscal year or after the end of such fiscal year to a
Participant who ceases to be a Senior Managing Director for any reason prior to the end of such fiscal year. Within the limitations set forth in the
preceding sentence, the Compensation Committee may authorize one or more such on account payments, but the aggregate amount of any such on
account payments shall not exceed the aggregate amount permitted to be paid pursuant to the Plan with respect to the same fiscal year. In connection
with any such on account payments, the Compensation Committee shall require an undertaking or other assurance by or on behalf of the
Participant receiving such payment to repay the Company the amount, if any, by which such on account payment exceeds the actual amount
determined to be due to such person under the Plan in respect of such fiscal year. Any on account payments received prior to the end of a
fiscal year shall be discounted to reasonably reflect the time value of money from the date of payment to the date 30 days after the end of the fiscal
year.
6.4. The Compensation
Committee may determine that payment of a portion of the Bonuses shall be deferred, the periods of such deferrals and any interest, not to exceed a
reasonable rate, to be paid in respect of deferred payments. The Compensation Committee may also define such other conditions of payments of Bonuses as
it may deem desirable in carrying out the purposes of the Plan.
6.5. In any fiscal year, any
balance in the Annual Bonus Pools for any reason, including the limitation contained in Section 6.1, the forfeiture of a Bonus under Section 6.2, the
reduction of a Bonus under Section 5.4, or otherwise, shall not be distributed to other Participants and shall not be carried forward or be available
for distribution as Bonuses under the Plan in a future year or years.
B-2
Section 7. Administration and
Interpretation. The Plan shall be administered by the Compensation Committee, which shall have the sole authority to interpret
and to make rules and regulations for the administration of the Plan. The Compensation Committee may
correct any defect or supply any omission or reconcile any inconsistency in the Plan in the manner and to the extent the Compensation Committee deems
necessary or desirable to carry it into effect. Any decision of the Compensation Committee in the interpretation and administration of the Plan, as
described herein, shall lie within its sole and absolute discretion and shall be final, conclusive and binding on all parties concerned. No member of
the Compensation Committee and no officer of the Company shall be liable for anything done or omitted to be done by him or her, by any other member of
the Compensation Committee or by any officer of the Company in connection with the performance of duties under the Plan, except for his or her own
willful misconduct or as expressly provided by statute. The Compensation Committee may request advice or assistance or employ such persons (including,
without limitation, legal counsel and accountants) as it deems necessary for the proper administration of the Plan.
Section 8. Administrative
Expenses. Any expense incurred in the administration of the Plan shall be borne by the Company out of its general funds and not
charged against the Annual Bonus Pools, except insofar as such expenses shall be taken into account in determining the components of the Annual Bonus
Pools hereunder.
Section 9. Amendment or
Termination. The Compensation Committee of the Company may from time to time amend the Plan in any respect or terminate the Plan
in whole or in part, provided that no such action shall retroactively impair or otherwise adversely affect the rights of any Participant to benefits
under the Plan which have accrued prior to the date of such action.
Section 10. No
Assignment. The rights hereunder, including without limitation rights to receive a Base Salary or Bonus, shall not be sold,
assigned, transferred, encumbered or hypothecated by an employee of the Company (except by testamentary disposition or intestate succession), and,
during the lifetime of any recipient, any payment of Base Salary or a Bonus shall be payable only to such recipient.
Section 11. The
Company. For purposes of this Plan, the Company shall include the successors and assigns of the Company, and this
Plan shall be binding on any corporation or other person with which the Company is merged or consolidated, or which acquires substantially all of the
assets of the Company, or which otherwise succeeds to its business.
Section 12. Stockholder
Approval. The Plan was approved by the stockholders of the Company at the 1998 Annual Meeting of Stockholders. The increase in
the maximum aggregate amount of the Annual Bonus Pool that can be paid to non-executive committee members pursuant to Section 5.6 and the limitation on
each Participants proportionate share of any Annual Bonus Pool pursuant to Section 6.1 shall be subject to approval by the affirmative vote of a
majority of the shares cast in a separate vote of the stockholders of the Company at the 2005 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, and such stockholder
approval shall be a condition to the right of such Participants to receive any Bonus hereunder.
B-3
EXHIBIT C
THE BEAR STEARNS COMPANIES INC. (the Corporation)
Board
Candidate Guidelines
The following are the criteria that the Nominating
Committee and the Board shall utilize when evaluating a Board candidate:
The Board of Directors should be composed of
individuals who have demonstrated significant achievements in business, education or public service. Director-candidates should possess the requisite
character, knowledge, education and experience to make a significant contribution to the Board and bring a range of skills, perspectives and
backgrounds to the deliberations of the Board. Significantly, a director-candidate must have high ethical standards, a strong sense of professionalism
and a willingness to serve the interests of the stockholders. For those director-candidates who are also employees of the Corporation, such individuals
should be members of the executive management team of the Corporation who have, or are in the position to acquire, a broad base of information about
the Corporation and its businesses.
The Board should conclude that the professional and
personal background of each director-candidate has enabled him or her to acquire the wisdom, insight and perspective necessary to effectively fulfill a
directors duties. In addition, the following specific attributes and qualifications should be considered in evaluating the candidacy of an
individual as a director on the Board of Directors:
Management and Leadership Experience The
director-candidate must have extensive experience in business, education or public service.
The experience of candidates from the different
fields of business, education, or public service should be assessed and evaluated as follows:
Candidates from the Field of
Business. The director-candidate is or has been the chief executive officer, chief operating officer or chief financial officer, or
holds or has held a senior managerial position in one of the following: a major public corporation; a recognized privately held entity; or a recognized
money or investment management firm.
Candidates from the Field of
Education. The director-candidate holds or has held a position at a prominent educational institution comparable to the position of
university or college president and/or dean of a school within the university or college, or holds or has held a senior faculty position in an area of
study important or relevant to the Corporation.
Candidates from the Field of Public
Service. The director-candidate has held one or more elected or appointed senior positions in the federal government or any federal
agency, any state or municipal government or agency, or holds or has held one or more elected or appointed senior positions in a nonprofit
organization.
Skills and Diverse Background The
director-candidate must bring a desired range of skills, diverse perspectives and experience to the Board.
The following attributes should be considered in
assessing the contribution that the director-candidate could make as a member of the Board:
Financial
Literacy. Director-candidates having a sufficient understanding of financial reporting and internal control principles, or financial
management experience, would bring desirable knowledge and skills to the Board.
International
Experience. International experience would be a positive characteristic in a director-candidates profile. Having an understanding
of the culture of English and non-English speaking foreign countries would also be considered beneficial.
Knowledge of the Duties of a
Director. The director-candidates capacity and/or experience to understand fully the legal responsibilities of a director and the
governance processes of a public company is an essential factor.
No Interlocking Directorships. The
director-candidate should not have any prohibitive interlocking relationships or conflicts of interest.
C-1
Integrity and Professionalism The
director-candidate must have high ethical standards, a strong sense of professionalism and be capable of serving the interests of
stockholders.
Personal Experience. The
director-candidate should be of high moral and ethical character. The candidate must exhibit independence, objectivity and willingness to serve as a
representative of the Corporations stockholders.
Individual Characteristics. The
director-candidate should possess personal qualities that would enable him or her to be able to make a contribution to Board deliberations. These
qualities include, for example, intelligence, self-assuredness, high ethical standards, interpersonal skills, independence, a willingness to ask
difficult questions, strong communication skills and commitment. In considering candidates for Board membership, the diversity of individual
experiences and backgrounds will be considered in looking at the composition of the Board.
Availability. The
director-candidate must have, and be willing to commit, the required hours necessary to discharge the duties of Board membership.
Compatibility. The
director-candidate should be able to develop a good working relationship with other Board members and contribute to the Boards working
relationship with the senior management of the Corporation.
C-2
EXHIBIT D
THE BEAR STEARNS COMPANIES INC. (the Corporation)
Director
Independence Standards
To be considered independent, a director
must satisfy the standards set forth below and an affirmative determination of independence must be made by the Board. The Board has established the
following guidelines to assist it in determining director independence in accordance with NYSE corporate governance listing standards:
(1) |
|
The director does not have a material relationship with the
Corporation (either directly or indirectly as a partner, stockholder or officer of an organization that has a relationship with the
Corporation). |
(2) |
|
The director is not and has not been an employee of the
Corporation or an immediate family member is not and has not been an executive officer of the Corporation within the last three years. |
(3) |
|
The director or an immediate family member has not received more
than $100,000 in direct compensation from the Corporation during any twelve-month period within the last three years, other than director and committee
fees and pension or other forms of deferred compensation for prior service (provided such compensation is not contingent in any way on continued
service). |
Compensation received by a director for former
service as an interim Chairman, CEO or other executive officer or compensation received by an immediate family member for services as an
employee (other than an executive officer) of the Corporation need not be considered in determining independence under this test.
(4) |
|
The director or an immediate family member is not a current
partner of the Corporations internal or external auditor; the director is not a current employee of the Corporations internal or external
auditor; an immediate family member of the director is not a current employee of the Corporations internal or external auditor and participates
in the Corporations audit, assurance or tax compliance (but not tax planning) practice; or the director or an immediate family member has not
been within the last three years a partner or employee of the Corporations internal or external auditor and personally worked on the
Corporations audit within that time. |
(5) |
|
The director or an immediate family member is not, and has not
been within the last three years, employed as an executive officer of another company where any of the Corporations present executive officers at
the same time serves or served on that companys compensation committee. |
(6) |
|
The director is not a current employee or an immediate family
member is not a current executive officer, of a company that has made payments to, or receives payments from, the Corporation for property or services
in an amount which, in any of the last three fiscal years, exceeds the greater of $1 million or 2% of such other companys consolidated gross
revenues. |
For purposes of these standards, the term
immediate family member shall include a persons spouse, parents, children, siblings, mothers and fathers-in-law, sons and
daughters-in-law, brothers and sisters-in-law, and anyone (other than domestic employees) who shares such persons home. Individuals who are no
longer immediate family members as a result of legal separation or divorce, or who have died or become incapacitated, need not be
considered.
D-1
PROXY
THE BEAR STEARNS COMPANIES INC.
Proxy Solicited on Behalf of the Board of Directors for
Annual Meeting of Stockholders April 7, 2005 at 5:00 p.m. E.D.T.
The undersigned stockholder of The Bear Stearns Companies Inc. (the Company) hereby appoints James E. Cayne and Alan C. Greenberg, and each of them, as attorneys and proxies, each with power of substitution and revocation, to represent the undersigned at the Annual Meeting of Stockholders of the Company to be held in the Bear Stearns Auditorium at 383 Madison Avenue, 2nd Floor, New York, New York, 10179, at 5:00 p.m. Eastern Daylight Time, on April 7, 2005, and at any adjournments or postponements thereof, with authority to vote all shares of Common Stock of the Company held or owned by the undersigned on February 23, 2005, in accordance with the directions indicated herein.
THIS PROXY, WHEN PROPERLY EXECUTED, WILL BE VOTED IN THE MANNER DIRECTED HEREIN BY THE UNDERSIGNED STOCKHOLDER. UNLESS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED, THIS PROXY WILL BE VOTED FOR EACH OF THE NOMINEES NAMED HEREIN AND FOR ITEMS 2, AND 3 AND PURSUANT TO ITEM 4.
If you wish to note any Address Changes, please write details in space below and mark corresponding box on the reverse side.
(Continued and to be marked, dated and signed, on reverse side)
THE BEAR STEARNS COMPANIES INC.
383 MADISON AVENUE
NEW YORK, NY 10179
VOTE BY INTERNET - www.proxyvote.com
Use the Internet to transmit your voting instructions and for electronic delivery of information up until 11:59
p.m. Eastern Daylight Time the day before meeting date. Have your proxy card in hand when you access the web site
and follow the instructions to obtain your records and to create an electronic voting instruction form.
VOTE BY PHONE - 1-800-690-6903
For access from the U.S. or Canada, use
any touch-tone telephone to transmit your voting instructions up until
11:59 p.m. Eastern Daylight Time the day before meeting date. Have your proxy card in hand when you call and then
follow the instructions.
VOTE BY MAIL
Mark, sign and date your proxy card and
return it in the postage-paid envelope we have provided or return it to
The Bear Stearns Companies Inc., c/o ADP, 51 Mercedes Way, Edgewood, NY 11717.
|
|
|
TO VOTE, MARK BLOCKS BELOW IN BLUE OR BLACK INK AS FOLLOWS: |
BRSTR1 |
KEEP THIS PORTION FOR YOUR RECORDS |
|
|
DETACH AND RETURN THIS PORTION ONLY IF VOTING BY MAIL |
THIS PROXY CARD IS VALID ONLY WHEN SIGNED AND DATED. |
THE BEAR STEARNS COMPANIES INC.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS A VOTE
FOR EACH OF THE NOMINEES NAMED HEREIN AND
FOR ITEMS 2 AND 3 AND PURSUANT TO ITEM 4. |
|
ITEM 1 - |
ELECTION OF DIRECTORS: |
For |
Withhold |
For All |
To
withhold authority to vote for any individual nominee, mark the FOR
ALL EXCEPT box and write the nominee's number on the line below.
|
|
|
Nominees for Directors: |
|
All |
All |
Except |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1)
2)
3)
4)
5)
6) |
James E. Cayne
Henry S. Bienen
Carl D. Glickman
Alan C. Greenberg
Donald J. Harrington
Frank T. Nickell |
7)
8)
9)
10)
11)
12) |
Paul A. Novelly
Frederic V. Salerno
Alan D. Schwartz
Warren J. Spector
Vincent Tese
Wesley S. Williams Jr. |
o |
o |
o |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vote on Proposals |
|
|
|
|
|
|
For |
Against |
Abstain |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ITEM 2 - |
APPROVAL OF AMENDMENTS TO THE PERFORMANCE COMPENSATION
PLAN; |
o |
o |
o |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ITEM 3 - |
RATIFICATION
OF THE APPOINTMENT OF DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP AS INDEPENDENT AUDITORS
FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDING NOVEMBER 30, 2005; |
o |
o |
o |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ITEM 4 - |
In
their discretion, the proxies are authorized to vote upon such other business
as may properly be presented at the meeting or any adjournments or postponements
thereof. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
This proxy card is valid only when signed and dated. Please date
and sign exactly as name appears hereon. When signing as attorney, administrator,
trustee, custodian or guardian, give full title as such. Where more than
one owner, all should sign. Proxies executed by a partnership or corporation
should be signed in the full partnership or corporate name by a partner
or authorized officer. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For
address changes, please mark this box and write them on the back where
indicated |
o |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Yes |
No |
|
|
Yes |
No |
HOUSEHOLDING ELECTION - Please indicate if you consent to receive
certain future investor communications in a single package per household
|
|
o |
o |
|
Please indicate if you plan to
attend this meeting |
o |
o |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Signature
[PLEASE SIGN WITHIN BOX] Date |
|
Signature
(Joint Owners) Date |