security.htm
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
[X] QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF
THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the quarter ended March 31, 2014, or
[ ] TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)
OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the Transition Period from _____ to ________
Commission file number: 000-09341
SECURITY NATIONAL FINANCIAL CORPORATION
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
UTAH
|
87-0345941
|
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)
|
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
|
|
|
5300 South 360 West, Suite 250, Salt Lake City, Utah
|
84123
|
(Address of principal executive offices)
|
(Zip Code)
|
|
|
(801) 264-1060
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)
|
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes [X] No [ ]
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Website, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes [X] No [ ]
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
|
Large accelerated filer [ ]
|
Accelerated filer [ ]
|
|
Non-accelerated filer [ ] (Do not check if a smaller reporting company)
|
Smaller reporting company [X]
|
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes [ ] No[X]
Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date.
Class A Common Stock, $2.00 par value
|
|
11,844,677
|
Title of Class
|
|
Number of Shares Outstanding as of May 14, 2014
|
|
|
|
Class C Common Stock, $.20 par value
|
|
13,294,792
|
Title of Class
|
|
Number of Shares Outstanding as of May 14, 2014
|
SECURITY NATIONAL FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
FORM 10-Q
QUARTER ENDED MARCH 31, 2014
TABLE OF CONTENTS
|
|
Page No.
|
|
PART I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION
|
|
Item 1.
|
Financial Statements
|
|
|
|
|
|
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets as of March 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013 (unaudited)
|
3-4
|
|
|
|
|
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Earnings for the Three Months Ended March 31, 2014 and 2013 (unaudited)
|
5
|
|
|
|
|
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income for the Three Months Ended March 31, 2014 and 2013 (unaudited)
|
6
|
|
|
|
|
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Stockholders' Equity as of March 31, 2014 and March 31, 2013 (unaudited)
|
7
|
|
|
|
|
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Three Months Ended March 31, 2014 and 2013 (unaudited)
|
8
|
|
|
|
|
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited)
|
9
|
|
|
|
Item 2.
|
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
|
37
|
|
|
|
Item 3.
|
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk
|
44
|
|
|
|
Item 4.
|
Controls and Procedures
|
44
|
|
|
|
|
PART II - OTHER INFORMATION
|
|
|
|
|
Item 1.
|
Legal Proceedings
|
44
|
|
|
|
Item 2.
|
Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
|
46
|
|
|
|
Item 3.
|
Defaults Upon Senior Securities
|
46
|
|
|
|
Item 4.
|
Mine Safety Disclosures
|
46
|
|
|
|
Item 5.
|
Other Information
|
46
|
|
|
|
Item 6.
|
Exhibits
|
47
|
SECURITY NATIONAL FINANCIAL CORPORATION
AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(Unaudited)
Part I - Financial Information
Item 1. Financial Statements.
Assets
|
|
March 31
2014
|
|
|
December 31
2013
|
|
Investments:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed maturity securities, held to maturity, at amortized cost
|
|
$ |
141,891,408 |
|
|
$ |
143,466,494 |
|
Equity securities, available for sale, at estimated fair value
|
|
|
6,019,096 |
|
|
|
4,498,756 |
|
Mortgage loans on real estate and construction loans, held for investment net of allowances for losses of $1,689,154 and $1,652,090 for 2014 and 2013
|
|
|
116,077,494 |
|
|
|
102,781,878 |
|
Real estate held for investment, net of accumulated depreciation of $9,941,411 and $9,658,599 for 2014 and 2013
|
|
|
100,209,945 |
|
|
|
99,760,475 |
|
Policy and other loans, net of allowances for doubtful accounts of $322,985 and $269,175 for 2014 and 2013
|
|
|
22,400,544 |
|
|
|
19,724,006 |
|
Short-term investments
|
|
|
16,818,276 |
|
|
|
12,135,719 |
|
Accrued investment income
|
|
|
2,643,486 |
|
|
|
2,485,054 |
|
Total investments
|
|
|
406,060,249 |
|
|
|
384,852,382 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
44,829,114 |
|
|
|
38,203,164 |
|
Mortgage loans sold to investors
|
|
|
59,037,697 |
|
|
|
77,179,652 |
|
Receivables, net
|
|
|
12,156,687 |
|
|
|
11,652,572 |
|
Restricted assets
|
|
|
6,590,806 |
|
|
|
6,670,980 |
|
Cemetery perpetual care trust investments
|
|
|
2,464,524 |
|
|
|
2,414,883 |
|
Receivable from reinsurers
|
|
|
7,489,080 |
|
|
|
12,033,877 |
|
Cemetery land and improvements
|
|
|
10,812,688 |
|
|
|
10,631,573 |
|
Deferred policy and pre-need contract acquisition costs
|
|
|
47,087,234 |
|
|
|
45,737,940 |
|
Mortgage servicing rights, net
|
|
|
5,153,495 |
|
|
|
4,844,101 |
|
Property and equipment, net
|
|
|
11,300,964 |
|
|
|
11,523,160 |
|
Value of business acquired
|
|
|
9,019,486 |
|
|
|
8,680,845 |
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
677,039 |
|
|
|
677,039 |
|
Other
|
|
|
4,061,264 |
|
|
|
3,655,286 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Assets
|
|
$ |
626,740,327 |
|
|
$ |
618,757,454 |
|
See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.
SECURITY NATIONAL FINANCIAL CORPORATION
AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS (Continued)
(Unaudited)
|
|
March 31
2014
|
|
|
December 31
2013
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities and Stockholders' Equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Future life, annuity, and other benefits
|
|
$ |
460,053,487 |
|
|
$ |
452,130,649 |
|
Unearned premium reserve
|
|
|
5,133,054 |
|
|
|
5,173,785 |
|
Bank and other loans payable
|
|
|
17,724,275 |
|
|
|
18,289,438 |
|
Deferred pre-need cemetery and mortuary contract revenues
|
|
|
13,106,027 |
|
|
|
13,176,476 |
|
Cemetery perpetual care obligation
|
|
|
3,309,436 |
|
|
|
3,266,131 |
|
Accounts payable
|
|
|
2,295,186 |
|
|
|
2,850,575 |
|
Other liabilities and accrued expenses
|
|
|
20,432,293 |
|
|
|
20,167,363 |
|
Income taxes
|
|
|
16,183,968 |
|
|
|
15,951,848 |
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
538,237,726 |
|
|
|
531,006,265 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders' Equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Stock:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Class A: common stock - $2.00 par value; 20,000,000 shares authorized; issued 11,844,677 shares in 2014 and 11,807,287 shares in 2013
|
|
|
23,689,354 |
|
|
|
23,614,574 |
|
Class B: non-voting common stock - $1.00 par value; 5,000,000 shares authorized; none issued or outstanding
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
Class C: convertible common stock - $0.20 par value; 15,000,000 shares authorized; issued 13,294,792 shares in 2014 and 13,301,908 shares in 2013
|
|
|
2,658,958 |
|
|
|
2,660,382 |
|
Additional paid-in capital
|
|
|
23,341,976 |
|
|
|
23,215,875 |
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income, net of taxes
|
|
|
1,534,531 |
|
|
|
1,218,396 |
|
Retained earnings
|
|
|
39,797,080 |
|
|
|
39,666,587 |
|
Treasury stock at cost - 1,103,299 Class A shares in 2014 and 1,141,021 Class A shares in 2013
|
|
|
(2,519,298 |
) |
|
|
(2,624,625 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders' equity
|
|
|
88,502,601 |
|
|
|
87,751,189 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Liabilities and Stockholders' Equity
|
|
$ |
626,740,327 |
|
|
$ |
618,757,454 |
|
See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.
SECURITY NATIONAL FINANCIAL CORPORATION
AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF EARNINGS
(Unaudited)
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31
|
|
|
|
2014
|
|
|
2013
|
|
Revenues:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Insurance premiums and other considerations
|
|
$ |
13,129,447 |
|
|
$ |
12,421,543 |
|
Net investment income
|
|
|
5,642,500 |
|
|
|
5,001,017 |
|
Net mortuary and cemetery sales
|
|
|
2,831,062 |
|
|
|
2,877,523 |
|
Realized gains on investments and other assets
|
|
|
198,993 |
|
|
|
842,578 |
|
Other than temporary impairments on investments
|
|
|
(30,000 |
) |
|
|
(30,000 |
) |
Mortgage fee income
|
|
|
22,537,538 |
|
|
|
33,262,881 |
|
Other
|
|
|
743,736 |
|
|
|
476,692 |
|
Total revenues
|
|
|
45,053,276 |
|
|
|
54,852,234 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Benefits and expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Death benefits
|
|
|
6,675,493 |
|
|
|
6,756,419 |
|
Surrenders and other policy benefits
|
|
|
515,612 |
|
|
|
750,249 |
|
Increase in future policy benefits
|
|
|
4,367,443 |
|
|
|
4,551,741 |
|
Amortization of deferred policy and pre-need acquisition costs and value of business acquired
|
|
|
1,403,642 |
|
|
|
1,493,905 |
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commissions
|
|
|
10,560,881 |
|
|
|
17,570,585 |
|
Salaries
|
|
|
8,916,464 |
|
|
|
8,178,698 |
|
Provision for loan losses and loss reserve
|
|
|
372,093 |
|
|
|
552,289 |
|
Costs related to funding mortgage loans
|
|
|
1,297,685 |
|
|
|
1,607,235 |
|
Other
|
|
|
9,789,813 |
|
|
|
8,856,600 |
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
497,864 |
|
|
|
807,276 |
|
Cost of goods and services sold-mortuaries and cemeteries
|
|
|
490,299 |
|
|
|
499,614 |
|
Total benefits and expenses
|
|
|
44,887,289 |
|
|
|
51,624,611 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings before income taxes
|
|
|
165,987 |
|
|
|
3,227,623 |
|
Income tax expense
|
|
|
(27,139 |
) |
|
|
(1,194,357 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings
|
|
$ |
138,848 |
|
|
$ |
2,033,266 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings per Class A Equivalent common share (1)
|
|
$ |
0.01 |
|
|
$ |
0.18 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings per Class A Equivalent common share-assuming dilution (1)
|
|
$ |
0.01 |
|
|
$ |
0.16 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-average Class A equivalent common share outstanding (1)
|
|
|
11,786,353 |
|
|
|
11,613,952 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-average Class A equivalent common shares outstanding-assuming dilution (1)
|
|
|
12,227,249 |
|
|
|
12,658,895 |
|
(1) Net earnings per share amounts have been adjusted retroactively for the effect of annual stock dividends. The weighted-average shares outstanding includes the weighted-average Class A common shares and the weighted-average Class C common shares determined on an equivalent Class A common share basis. Net earnings per common share represent net earnings per equivalent Class A common share. Net earnings per Class C common share is equal to one-tenth (1/10) of such amount.
See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.
SECURITY NATIONAL FINANCIAL CORPORATION
AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
(Unaudited)
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31
|
|
|
|
2014
|
|
|
2013
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings
|
|
$ |
138,848 |
|
|
$ |
2,033,266 |
|
Other comprehensive income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net unrealized gains (losses) on derivative instruments
|
|
|
278,230 |
|
|
|
(578,647 |
) |
Net unrealized gains on available for sale securities
|
|
|
37,905 |
|
|
|
203,221 |
|
Other comprehensive income (loss)
|
|
|
316,135 |
|
|
|
(375,426 |
) |
Comprehensive income
|
|
$ |
454,983 |
|
|
$ |
1,657,840 |
|
See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.
SECURITY NATIONAL FINANCIAL CORPORATION
AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
(Unaudited)
|
|
Class A
Common Stock
|
|
|
Class C
Common Stock
|
|
|
Additional
Paid-in
Capital
|
|
|
Accumulated Other Comprehensive
Income (Loss)
|
|
|
Retained
Earnings
|
|
|
Treasury Stock
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2012
|
|
$ |
21,687,152 |
|
|
$ |
2,194,820 |
|
|
$ |
21,262,140 |
|
|
$ |
1,934,359 |
|
|
$ |
35,114,072 |
|
|
$ |
(2,380,434 |
) |
|
$ |
79,812,109 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
2,033,266 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
2,033,266 |
|
Other comprehensive loss
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(375,426 |
) |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(375,426 |
) |
Grant of stock options
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
52,969 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
52,969 |
|
Exercise of stock options
|
|
|
204,206 |
|
|
|
86,677 |
|
|
|
(74,155 |
) |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
216,728 |
|
Sale of treasury stock
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
63,986 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
19,727 |
|
|
|
83,713 |
|
Conversion Class C to Class A
|
|
|
1,818 |
|
|
|
(1,819 |
) |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
Balance at March 31, 2013
|
|
$ |
21,893,176 |
|
|
$ |
2,279,678 |
|
|
$ |
21,304,941 |
|
|
$ |
1,558,933 |
|
|
$ |
37,147,338 |
|
|
$ |
(2,360,707 |
) |
|
$ |
81,823,359 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2013
|
|
$ |
23,614,574 |
|
|
$ |
2,660,382 |
|
|
$ |
23,215,875 |
|
|
$ |
1,218,396 |
|
|
$ |
39,666,587 |
|
|
$ |
(2,624,625 |
) |
|
$ |
87,751,189 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
138,848 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
138,848 |
|
Other comprehensive income
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
316,135 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
316,135 |
|
Grant of stock options
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
64,325 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
64,325 |
|
Exercise of stock options
|
|
|
69,910 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(19,611 |
) |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
50,299 |
|
Sale of treasury stock
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
76,478 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
105,327 |
|
|
|
181,805 |
|
Stock Dividends
|
|
|
3,446 |
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
4,910 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(8,355 |
) |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
Conversion Class C to Class A
|
|
|
1,424 |
|
|
|
(1,423 |
) |
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
Balance at March 31, 2014
|
|
$ |
23,689,354 |
|
|
$ |
2,658,958 |
|
|
$ |
23,341,976 |
|
|
$ |
1,534,531 |
|
|
$ |
39,797,080 |
|
|
$ |
(2,519,298 |
) |
|
$ |
88,502,601 |
|
See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.
SECURITY NATIONAL FINANCIAL CORPORATION
AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(Unaudited)
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31
|
|
|
|
2014
|
|
|
2013
|
|
Cash flows from operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities
|
|
$ |
22,716,675 |
|
|
$ |
5,449,312 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from investing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securities held to maturity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase-fixed maturity securities
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(9,919,352 |
) |
Calls and maturities - fixed maturity securities
|
|
|
1,482,142 |
|
|
|
2,406,652 |
|
Securities available for sale:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase - equity securities
|
|
|
(2,078,830 |
) |
|
|
(425,877 |
) |
Sales - equity securities
|
|
|
666,524 |
|
|
|
1,252,757 |
|
Purchase of short-term investments
|
|
|
(4,995,216 |
) |
|
|
(10,206,512 |
) |
Sales of short-term investments
|
|
|
312,659 |
|
|
|
30,482,179 |
|
Sales (purchases) of restricted assets
|
|
|
94,028 |
|
|
|
(56,243 |
) |
Changes in assets for perpetual care trusts
|
|
|
(59,880 |
) |
|
|
(54,533 |
) |
Amount received for perpetual care trusts
|
|
|
43,305 |
|
|
|
9,105 |
|
Mortgage, policy, and other loans made
|
|
|
(49,908,636 |
) |
|
|
(27,324,342 |
) |
Payments received for mortgage, policy and other loans
|
|
|
33,846,466 |
|
|
|
30,188,402 |
|
Purchase of property and equipment
|
|
|
(275,002 |
) |
|
|
(810,223 |
) |
Purchase of real estate
|
|
|
(2,139,341 |
) |
|
|
(30,317 |
) |
Sale of real estate
|
|
|
1,247,104 |
|
|
|
757,150 |
|
Cash received from reinsurance
|
|
|
7,304,993 |
|
|
|
- |
|
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities
|
|
|
(14,459,684 |
) |
|
|
16,268,846 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from financing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Annuity contract receipts
|
|
|
2,524,342 |
|
|
|
2,189,717 |
|
Annuity contract withdrawals
|
|
|
(3,647,370 |
) |
|
|
(4,125,531 |
) |
Proceeds from stock options exercised
|
|
|
50,299 |
|
|
|
216,728 |
|
Repayment of bank loans on notes and contracts
|
|
|
(588,471 |
) |
|
|
(535,814 |
) |
Proceeds from borrowing on bank loans
|
|
|
30,159 |
|
|
|
4,733,975 |
|
Change in line of credit borrowings
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(4,608,204 |
) |
Net cash used in financing activities
|
|
|
(1,631,041 |
) |
|
|
(2,129,129 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net change in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
6,625,950 |
|
|
|
19,589,029 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period
|
|
|
38,203,164 |
|
|
|
38,906,115 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period
|
|
$ |
44,829,114 |
|
|
$ |
58,495,144 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non Cash Investing and Financing Activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage loans foreclosed into real estate
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
1,747,802 |
|
See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.
SECURITY NATIONAL FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
March 31, 2014 (Unaudited)
1) Basis of Presentation
The accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America for interim financial information and with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Articles 8 and 10 of Regulation S-X. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and disclosures required by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America for complete financial statements. These financial statements should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements of the Company and notes thereto for the year ended December 31, 2013, included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K (file number 000-09341). In the opinion of management, all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring accruals) considered necessary for a fair presentation have been included. Operating results for the three months ended March 31, 2014 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the year ending December 31, 2014.
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the financial statements and accompanying notes. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
The estimates susceptible to significant change are those used in determining the liability for future policy benefits and claims, those used in determining valuation allowances for mortgage loans on real estate and construction loans held for investment, those used in determining loan loss reserve, and those used in determining the estimated future costs for pre-need sales. Although some variability is inherent in these estimates, management believes the amounts provided are fairly stated in all material respects.
Certain 2013 amounts have been reclassified to bring them into conformity with the 2014 presentation.
2) Recent Accounting Pronouncements
ASU No. 2014-04: “Reclassification of Residential Real Estate Collateralized Consumer Mortgage Loans upon Foreclosure (a consensus of the FASB Emerging Issues Task Force) - In January 2014, ASU No. 2014-04 amended ASC Topic 310, "Receivables" to reduce diversity by clarifying when an in substance repossession or foreclosure occurs, that is, when a creditor should be considered to have received physical possession of residential real estate property collateralizing a consumer mortgage loan such that the loan receivable should be derecognized and the real estate property recognized. The new authoritative guidance is effective for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2014 and is not expected to have a significant impact on the Company’s results of operations or financial position.
SECURITY NATIONAL FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
March 31, 2014 (Unaudited)
3) Investments
The Company’s investments in fixed maturity securities held to maturity and equity securities available for sale as of March 31, 2014 are summarized as follows:
|
|
Amortized
Cost
|
|
|
Gross
Unrealized
Gains
|
|
|
Gross
Unrealized
Losses
|
|
|
Estimated
Fair
Value
|
|
March 31, 2014:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed maturity securities held to maturity carried at amortized cost:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bonds:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Treasury securities and obligations of U.S. Government agencies
|
|
$ |
2,280,748 |
|
|
$ |
322,509 |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
2,603,257 |
|
Obligations of states and political subdivisions
|
|
|
1,791,368 |
|
|
|
228,771 |
|
|
|
(8,326 |
) |
|
|
2,011,813 |
|
Corporate securities including public utilities
|
|
|
133,084,680 |
|
|
|
13,552,685 |
|
|
|
(649,300 |
) |
|
|
145,988,065 |
|
Mortgage-backed securities
|
|
|
4,122,589 |
|
|
|
280,868 |
|
|
|
(11,017 |
) |
|
|
4,392,440 |
|
Redeemable preferred stock
|
|
|
612,023 |
|
|
|
10,531 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
622,554 |
|
Total fixed maturity securities held to maturity
|
|
$ |
141,891,408 |
|
|
$ |
14,395,364 |
|
|
$ |
(668,643 |
) |
|
$ |
155,618,129 |
|
|
|
Amortized
Cost
|
|
|
Gross
Unrealized
Gains
|
|
|
Gross
Unrealized
Losses
|
|
|
Estimated
Fair
Value
|
|
March 31, 2014:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity securities available for sale at estimated fair value:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Industrial, miscellaneous and all other
|
|
$ |
6,249,495 |
|
|
$ |
301,155 |
|
|
$ |
(531,554 |
) |
|
$ |
6,019,096 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total equity securities available for sale at estimated fair value
|
|
$ |
6,249,495 |
|
|
$ |
301,155 |
|
|
$ |
(531,554 |
) |
|
$ |
6,019,096 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage loans on real estate and construction loans held for investment at amortized cost:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential
|
|
$ |
55,147,389 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential construction
|
|
|
13,978,754 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial
|
|
|
48,640,505 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less: Allowance for loan losses
|
|
|
(1,689,154 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total mortgage loans on real estate and construction loans held for investment
|
|
$ |
116,077,494 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Real estate held for investment - net of depreciation
|
|
$ |
100,179,474 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Policy and other loans at amortized cost:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Policy loans
|
|
$ |
7,408,878 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other loans
|
|
|
15,314,651 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less: Allowance for doubtful accounts
|
|
|
(322,985 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total policy and other loans at amortized cost
|
|
$ |
22,400,544 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Short-term investments at amortized cost
|
|
$ |
16,818,276 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SECURITY NATIONAL FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
March 31, 2014 (Unaudited)
3) Investments (Continued)
The Company’s investments in fixed maturity securities held to maturity and equity securities available for sale as of December 31, 2013 are summarized as follows:
|
|
Amortized
Cost
|
|
|
Gross
Unrealized
Gains
|
|
|
Gross
Unrealized
Losses
|
|
|
Estimated
Fair
Value
|
|
December 31, 2013:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed maturity securities held to maturity carried at amortized cost:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bonds:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Treasury securities and obligations of U.S. Government agencies
|
|
$ |
2,284,261 |
|
|
$ |
298,901 |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
2,583,162 |
|
Obligations of states and political subdivisions
|
|
|
1,790,661 |
|
|
|
197,340 |
|
|
|
(9,404 |
) |
|
|
1,978,597 |
|
Corporate securities including public utilities
|
|
|
134,257,468 |
|
|
|
10,513,448 |
|
|
|
(1,394,919 |
) |
|
|
143,375,997 |
|
Mortgage-backed securities
|
|
|
4,522,081 |
|
|
|
206,617 |
|
|
|
(11,351 |
) |
|
|
4,717,347 |
|
Redeemable preferred stock
|
|
|
612,023 |
|
|
|
12,994 |
|
|
|
(5,900 |
) |
|
|
619,117 |
|
Total fixed maturity securities held to maturity
|
|
$ |
143,466,494 |
|
|
$ |
11,229,300 |
|
|
$ |
(1,421,574 |
) |
|
$ |
153,274,220 |
|
|
|
Amortized Cost
|
|
|
Gross
Unrealized
Gains
|
|
|
Gross
Unrealized
Losses
|
|
|
Estimated Fair Value
|
|
December 31, 2013:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity securities available for sale at estimated fair value:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Industrial, miscellaneous and all other
|
|
$ |
4,783,936 |
|
|
$ |
240,206 |
|
|
$ |
(525,386 |
) |
|
$ |
4,498,756 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total securities available for sale carried at estimated fair value
|
|
$ |
4,783,936 |
|
|
$ |
240,206 |
|
|
$ |
(525,386 |
) |
|
$ |
4,498,756 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage loans on real estate and construction loans held for investment at amortized cost:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential
|
|
$ |
49,868,486 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential construction
|
|
|
12,912,473 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial
|
|
|
41,653,009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less: Allowance for loan losses
|
|
|
(1,652,090 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total mortgage loans on real estate and construction loans held for investment
|
|
$ |
102,781,878 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Real estate held for investment - net of depreciation
|
|
$ |
99,760,475 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Policy and other loans at amortized cost:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Policy loans
|
|
$ |
7,520,376 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other loans
|
|
|
12,472,805 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less: Allowance for doubtful accounts
|
|
|
(269,175 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total policy and other loans at amortized cost
|
|
$ |
19,724,006 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Short-term investments at amortized cost
|
|
$ |
12,135,719 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SECURITY NATIONAL FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
March 31, 2014 (Unaudited)
3) Investments (Continued)
Fixed Maturity Securities
The following tables summarize unrealized losses on fixed maturity securities, which are carried at amortized cost, at March 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013. The unrealized losses were primarily related to interest rate fluctuations. The tables set forth unrealized losses by duration and number of investment positions, together with the fair value of the related fixed maturity securities:
|
|
Unrealized
Losses for Less
than Twelve Months
|
|
|
No. of
Investment
Positions
|
|
|
Unrealized
Losses
for More
than Twelve
Months
|
|
|
No. of
Investment
Positions
|
|
|
Total
Unrealized
Loss
|
|
At March 31, 2014
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Obligations of states and political subdivisions
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
$ |
8,326 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
$ |
8,326 |
|
Corporate securities including public utilities
|
|
|
379,189 |
|
|
|
33 |
|
|
|
270,111 |
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
649,300 |
|
Mortgage-backed securities
|
|
|
2,779 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
8,238 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
11,017 |
|
Redeemable preferred stock
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
- |
|
Total unrealized losses
|
|
$ |
381,968 |
|
|
|
34 |
|
|
$ |
286,675 |
|
|
|
16 |
|
|
$ |
668,643 |
|
Fair Value
|
|
$ |
9,539,730 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
3,665,392 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
13,205,122 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At December 31, 2013
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Obligations of states and political subdivisions
|
|
$ |
7,131 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
$ |
2,273 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
$ |
9,404 |
|
Corporate securities including public utilities
|
|
|
1,134,414 |
|
|
|
72 |
|
|
|
260,504 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
1,394,918 |
|
Mortgage-backed securities
|
|
|
3,109 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
8,242 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
11,351 |
|
Redeemable preferred stock
|
|
|
5,900 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
5,900 |
|
Total unrealized losses
|
|
$ |
1,150,554 |
|
|
|
75 |
|
|
$ |
271,019 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
$ |
1,421,573 |
|
Fair Value
|
|
$ |
22,002,277 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
2,308,464 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
24,310,741 |
|
As of March 31, 2014, the average market value of the related fixed maturities was 95.2% of amortized cost and the average market value was 94.5% of amortized cost as of December 31, 2013. During the three months ended March 31, 2014 and 2013 an other than temporary decline in fair value resulted in the recognition of credit losses on fixed maturity securities of $30,000 and $30,000, respectively.
On a quarterly basis, the Company reviews its fixed maturity investment securities related to corporate securities and other public utilities, consisting of bonds and preferred stocks that are in a loss position. The review involves an analysis of the securities in relation to historical values, and projected earnings and revenue growth rates. Based on the analysis, a determination is made whether a security will likely recover from the loss position within a reasonable period of time. If it is unlikely that the investment will recover from the loss position, the loss is considered to be other than temporary, the security is written down to the impaired value and an impairment loss is recognized.
SECURITY NATIONAL FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
March 31, 2014 (Unaudited)
3) Investments (Continued)
Equity Securities
The following tables summarize unrealized losses on equity securities that were carried at estimated fair value based on quoted trading prices at March 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013. The unrealized losses were primarily the result of decreases in fair value due to overall equity market declines. The tables set forth unrealized losses by duration and number of investment positions, together with the fair value of the related equity securities available-for-sale in a loss position:
|
|
Unrealized
Losses for Less
than Twelve Months
|
|
|
No. of
Investment Positions
|
|
|
Unrealized
Losses for More
than Twelve Months
|
|
|
No. of
Investment Positions
|
|
|
Total
Unrealized
Losses
|
|
At March 31, 2014
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Industrial, miscellaneous and all other
|
|
$ |
140,329 |
|
|
|
34 |
|
|
$ |
391,225 |
|
|
|
26 |
|
|
$ |
531,554 |
|
Total unrealized losses
|
|
$ |
140,329 |
|
|
|
34 |
|
|
$ |
391,225 |
|
|
|
26 |
|
|
$ |
531,554 |
|
Fair Value
|
|
$ |
1,430,615 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
701,249 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
2,131,864 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At December 31, 2013
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Industrial, miscellaneous and all other
|
|
$ |
119,449 |
|
|
|
28 |
|
|
$ |
405,936 |
|
|
|
28 |
|
|
$ |
525,385 |
|
Total unrealized losses
|
|
$ |
119,449 |
|
|
|
28 |
|
|
$ |
405,936 |
|
|
|
28 |
|
|
$ |
525,385 |
|
Fair Value
|
|
$ |
993,612 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
772,345 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1,765,957 |
|
As of March 31, 2014, the average market value of the equity securities available for sale was 80.0% of the original investment and the average market value was 77.1% of the original investment as of December 31, 2013. The intent of the Company is to retain equity securities for a period of time sufficient to allow for the recovery in fair value. However, the Company may sell equity securities during a period in which the fair value has declined below the amount of the original investment. In certain situations new factors, including changes in the business environment, can change the Company’s previous intent to continue holding a security. During the three months ended March 31, 2014 and 2013, there was no other than temporary decline in fair value.
On a quarterly basis, the Company reviews its investment in industrial, miscellaneous and all other equity securities that are in a loss position. The review involves an analysis of the securities in relation to historical values, price earnings ratios, projected earnings and revenue growth rates. Based on the analysis a determination is made whether a security will likely recover from the loss position within a reasonable period of time. If it is unlikely that the investment will recover from the loss position, the loss is considered to be other than temporary, the security is written down to the impaired value and an impairment loss is recognized.
The fair values of fixed maturity securities are based on quoted market prices, when available. For fixed maturity securities not actively traded, fair values are estimated using values obtained from independent pricing services, or in the case of private placements, are estimated by discounting expected future cash flows using a current market value applicable to the coupon rate, credit and maturity of the investments. The fair values for equity securities are based on quoted market prices.
SECURITY NATIONAL FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
March 31, 2014 (Unaudited)
3) Investments (Continued)
The amortized cost and estimated fair value of fixed maturity securities at March 31, 2014, by contractual maturity, are shown below. Expected maturities may differ from contractual maturities because certain borrowers may have the right to call or prepay obligations with or without call or prepayment penalties.
|
|
Amortized
Cost
|
|
|
Estimated Fair
Value
|
|
Held to Maturity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Due in 2014
|
|
$ |
3,046,870 |
|
|
$ |
3,098,094 |
|
Due in 2015 through 2018
|
|
|
28,040,904 |
|
|
|
31,225,456 |
|
Due in 2019 through 2023
|
|
|
38,821,994 |
|
|
|
42,832,188 |
|
Due after 2023
|
|
|
67,247,028 |
|
|
|
73,447,397 |
|
Mortgage-backed securities
|
|
|
4,122,589 |
|
|
|
4,392,440 |
|
Redeemable preferred stock
|
|
|
612,023 |
|
|
|
622,554 |
|
Total held to maturity
|
|
$ |
141,891,408 |
|
|
$ |
155,618,129 |
|
The amortized cost and estimated fair value of available for sale securities at March 31, 2014, by contractual maturity, are shown below. Expected maturities may differ from contractual maturities because certain borrowers may have the right to call or prepay obligations with or without call or prepayment penalties. Equities are valued using the specific identification method.
|
|
Amortized
Cost
|
|
|
Estimated Fair
Value
|
|
Available for Sale:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Due in 2014
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
Due in 2015 through 2018
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
Due in 2019 through 2023
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
Due after 2023
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
Non-redeemable preferred stock
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
Common stock
|
|
|
6,249,495 |
|
|
|
6,019,096 |
|
Total available for sale
|
|
$ |
6,249,495 |
|
|
$ |
6,019,096 |
|
The Company’s realized gains and losses, other than temporary impairments from investments and other assets, are summarized as follows:
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31
|
|
|
|
2014
|
|
|
2013
|
|
Fixed maturity securities held to maturity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross realized gains
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
12,892 |
|
Gross realized losses
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(5,475 |
) |
Other than temporary impairments
|
|
|
(30,000 |
) |
|
|
(30,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securities available for sale:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross realized gains
|
|
|
53,253 |
|
|
|
133,956 |
|
Gross realized losses
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(737 |
) |
Other than temporary impairments
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross realized gains
|
|
|
145,740 |
|
|
|
710,787 |
|
Gross realized losses
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(8,845 |
) |
Other than temporary impairments
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
Total
|
|
$ |
168,993 |
|
|
$ |
812,578 |
|
SECURITY NATIONAL FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
March 31, 2014 (Unaudited)
3) Investments (Continued)
The net carrying amount of held to maturity securities sold was $-0- and $1,455,835 for the three months ended March 31, 2014 and the year ended December 31, 2013, respectively. The net realized gain related to these sales was $1,524 and $12,533 for the three months ended March 31, 2014 and 2013, respectively. Certain circumstances lead to these decisions to sell.
There were no investments, aggregated by issuer, in excess of 10% of shareholders’ equity (before net unrealized gains and losses on available for sale securities) at March 31, 2014, other than investments issued or guaranteed by the United States Government.
Major categories of net investment income are as follows:
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31
|
|
|
|
2014
|
|
|
2013
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed maturity securities
|
|
$ |
2,109,121 |
|
|
$ |
1,953,040 |
|
Equity securities
|
|
|
39,247 |
|
|
|
65,760 |
|
Mortgage loans on real estate
|
|
|
1,552,110 |
|
|
|
1,039,774 |
|
Real estate
|
|
|
1,689,595 |
|
|
|
1,079,129 |
|
Policy and other loans
|
|
|
197,568 |
|
|
|
203,135 |
|
Short-term investments, principally gains on sale of mortgage loans and other
|
|
|
1,899,113 |
|
|
|
2,207,594 |
|
Gross investment income
|
|
|
7,486,754 |
|
|
|
6,548,432 |
|
Investment expenses
|
|
|
(1,844,254 |
) |
|
|
(1,547,415 |
) |
Net investment income
|
|
$ |
5,642,500 |
|
|
$ |
5,001,017 |
|
Net investment income includes income earned by the restricted assets of the cemeteries and mortuaries of $94,745 and $91,470 for the three months ended March 31, 2014 and 2013 respectively.
Net investment income on real estate consists primarily of rental revenue received under short-term leases.
Investment expenses consist primarily of depreciation, property taxes, operating expenses of real estate and an estimated portion of administrative expenses relating to investment activities.
Securities on deposit for regulatory authorities as required by law amounted to $9,212,874 at March 31, 2014 and $9,215,222 at December 31, 2013. The restricted securities are included in various assets under investments on the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheets.
Mortgage Loans
Mortgage loans consist of first and second mortgages. The mortgage loans bear interest at rates ranging from 2.0% to 10.5%, maturity dates range from three months to 30 years and are secured by real estate. Concentrations of credit risk arise when a number of mortgage loan debtors have similar economic characteristics that would cause their ability to meet contractual obligations to be similarly affected by changes in economic conditions. Although the Company has a diversified mortgage loan portfolio consisting of residential mortgages, commercial loans and residential construction loans and requires collateral on all real estate exposures, a substantial portion of its debtors’ ability to honor obligations is reliant on the economic stability of the geographic region in which the debtors do business. At March 31, 2014, the Company had 34%, 20%, 10%, 9%, and 6% of its mortgage loans from borrowers located in the states of Utah, California, Florida, Texas, and Oklahoma, respectively. The mortgage loans on real estate balances on the consolidated balance sheet are reflected net of an allowance for loan losses of $1,689,154 and $1,652,090 at March 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013, respectively.
The Company establishes a valuation allowance for credit losses in its portfolio.
SECURITY NATIONAL FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
March 31, 2014 (Unaudited)
3) Investments (Continued)
The following is a summary of the allowance for loan losses as a contra-asset account for the periods presented:
Allowance for Credit Losses and Recorded Investment in Mortgage Loans
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial
|
|
|
Residential
|
|
|
Residential
Construction
|
|
|
Total
|
|
March 31, 2014
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for credit losses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beginning balance - January 1, 2014
|
|
$ |
187,129 |
|
|
$ |
1,364,847 |
|
|
$ |
100,114 |
|
|
$ |
1,652,090 |
|
Charge-offs
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
Provision
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
37,064 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
37,064 |
|
Ending balance -March 31, 2014
|
|
$ |
187,129 |
|
|
$ |
1,401,911 |
|
|
$ |
100,114 |
|
|
$ |
1,689,154 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ending balance: individually evaluated for impairment
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
174,180 |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
174,180 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ending balance: collectively evaluated for impairment
|
|
$ |
187,129 |
|
|
$ |
1,227,731 |
|
|
$ |
100,114 |
|
|
$ |
1,514,974 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ending balance: loans acquired with deteriorated credit quality
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage loans:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ending balance
|
|
$ |
48,640,505 |
|
|
$ |
55,147,389 |
|
|
$ |
13,978,754 |
|
|
$ |
117,766,648 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ending balance: individually evaluated for impairment
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
1,517,892 |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
1,517,892 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ending balance: collectively evaluated for impairment
|
|
$ |
48,640,505 |
|
|
$ |
53,629,497 |
|
|
$ |
13,978,754 |
|
|
$ |
116,248,756 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ending balance: loans acquired with deteriorated credit quality
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2013
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for credit losses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beginning balance - January 1, 2013
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
4,193,674 |
|
|
$ |
46,187 |
|
|
$ |
4,239,861 |
|
Charge-offs
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(2,670,794 |
) |
|
|
(137,629 |
) |
|
|
(2,808,423 |
) |
Provision
|
|
|
187,129 |
|
|
|
(158,033 |
) |
|
|
191,556 |
|
|
|
220,652 |
|
Ending balance - December 31, 2013
|
|
$ |
187,129 |
|
|
$ |
1,364,847 |
|
|
$ |
100,114 |
|
|
$ |
1,652,090 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ending balance: individually evaluated for impairment
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
152,745 |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
152,745 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ending balance: collectively evaluated for impairment
|
|
$ |
187,129 |
|
|
$ |
1,212,102 |
|
|
$ |
100,114 |
|
|
$ |
1,499,345 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ending balance: loans acquired with deteriorated credit quality
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage loans:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ending balance
|
|
$ |
41,653,009 |
|
|
$ |
49,868,486 |
|
|
$ |
12,912,473 |
|
|
$ |
104,433,968 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ending balance: individually evaluated for impairment
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
1,518,327 |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
1,518,327 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ending balance: collectively evaluated for impairment
|
|
$ |
41,653,009 |
|
|
$ |
48,350,159 |
|
|
$ |
12,912,473 |
|
|
$ |
102,915,641 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ending balance: loans acquired with deteriorated credit quality
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
SECURITY NATIONAL FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
March 31, 2014 (Unaudited)
3) Investments (Continued)
The following is a summary of the aging of mortgage loans for the periods presented:
Age Analysis of Past Due Mortgage Loans
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30-59 Days
Past Due
|
|
|
60-89 Days
Past Due
|
|
|
Greater Than
90 Days (1)
|
|
|
In Foreclosure (1)
|
|
|
Total
Past Due
|
|
|
Current
|
|
|
Total
Mortgage Loans
|
|
|
Allowance for
Loan Losses
|
|
|
Net Mortgage
Loans
|
|
March 31, 2014
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
4,973,745 |
|
|
$ |
4,973,745 |
|
|
$ |
43,666,760 |
|
|
$ |
48,640,505 |
|
|
$ |
(187,129 |
) |
|
$ |
48,453,376 |
|
Residential
|
|
|
2,641,721 |
|
|
|
925,882 |
|
|
|
6,599,822 |
|
|
|
1,517,892 |
|
|
|
11,685,317 |
|
|
|
43,462,072 |
|
|
|
55,147,389 |
|
|
|
(1,401,911 |
) |
|
|
53,745,478 |
|
Residential
Construction
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
64,895 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
64,895 |
|
|
|
13,913,859 |
|
|
|
13,978,754 |
|
|
|
(100,114 |
) |
|
|
13,878,640 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$ |
2,641,721 |
|
|
$ |
925,882 |
|
|
$ |
6,664,717 |
|
|
$ |
6,491,637 |
|
|
$ |
16,723,957 |
|
|
$ |
101,042,691 |
|
|
$ |
117,766,648 |
|
|
$ |
(1,689,154 |
) |
|
$ |
116,077,494 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2013
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
4,973,745 |
|
|
$ |
4,973,745 |
|
|
$ |
36,679,264 |
|
|
$ |
41,653,009 |
|
|
$ |
(187,129 |
) |
|
$ |
41,465,880 |
|
Residential
|
|
|
1,646,953 |
|
|
|
1,604,847 |
|
|
|
5,867,501 |
|
|
|
1,518,327 |
|
|
|
10,637,628 |
|
|
|
39,230,858 |
|
|
|
49,868,486 |
|
|
|
(1,364,847 |
) |
|
|
48,503,639 |
|
Residential
Construction
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
64,895 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
64,895 |
|
|
|
12,847,578 |
|
|
|
12,912,473 |
|
|
|
(100,114 |
) |
|
|
12,812,359 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$ |
1,646,953 |
|
|
$ |
1,604,847 |
|
|
$ |
5,932,396 |
|
|
$ |
6,492,072 |
|
|
$ |
15,676,268 |
|
|
$ |
88,757,700 |
|
|
$ |
104,433,968 |
|
|
$ |
(1,652,090 |
) |
|
$ |
102,781,878 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) Interest income is not recognized on loans past due greater than 90 days or in foreclosure.
|
|
SECURITY NATIONAL FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
March 31, 2014 (Unaudited)
3) Investments (Continued)
Impaired Mortgage Loans
Impaired mortgage loans include loans with a related specific valuation allowance or loans whose carrying amount has been reduced to the expected collectible amount because the impairment has been considered other than temporary. The recorded investment in and unpaid principal balance of impaired loans along with the related loan specific allowance for losses, if any, for each reporting period and the average recorded investment and interest income recognized during the time the loans were impaired were as follows:
Impaired Loans
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recorded
Investment
|
|
|
Unpaid
Principal Balance
|
|
|
Related
Allowance
|
|
|
Average
Recorded
Investment
|
|
|
Interest
Income
Recognized
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2014
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
With no related allowance recorded:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
Residential
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
Residential construction
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
With an allowance recorded:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
Residential
|
|
|
1,517,892 |
|
|
|
1,517,892 |
|
|
|
174,180 |
|
|
|
1,517,892 |
|
|
|
- |
|
Residential construction
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
Residential
|
|
|
1,517,892 |
|
|
|
1,517,892 |
|
|
|
174,180 |
|
|
|
1,517,892 |
|
|
|
- |
|
Residential construction
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2013
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
With no related allowance recorded:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
Residential
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
Residential construction
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
With an allowance recorded:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
Residential
|
|
|
1,518,327 |
|
|
|
1,518,327 |
|
|
|
152,745 |
|
|
|
1,518,327 |
|
|
|
- |
|
Residential construction
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
Residential
|
|
|
1,518,327 |
|
|
|
1,518,327 |
|
|
|
152,745 |
|
|
|
1,518,327 |
|
|
|
- |
|
Residential construction
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
SECURITY NATIONAL FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
March 31, 2014 (Unaudited)
3) Investments (Continued)
Credit Risk Profile Based on Performance Status
The Company’s mortgage loan portfolio is monitored based on performance of the loans. Monitoring a mortgage loan increases when the loan is delinquent or earlier if there is an indication of impairment. The Company defines non-performing mortgage loans as loans 90 days past due or on non-accrual status.
The Company’s performing and non-performing mortgage loans were as follows:
Mortgage Loan Credit Exposure
|
|
Credit Risk Profile Based on Payment Activity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial
|
|
|
Residential
|
|
|
Residential Construction
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
March 31,
2014
|
|
|
December 31,
2013
|
|
|
March 31,
2014
|
|
|
December 31,
2013
|
|
|
March 31,
2014
|
|
|
December 31,
2013
|
|
|
March 31,
2014
|
|
|
December 31,
2013
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Performing
|
|
$ |
43,666,760 |
|
|
$ |
36,679,264 |
|
|
$ |
47,029,675 |
|
|
$ |
42,482,658 |
|
|
$ |
13,913,859 |
|
|
$ |
12,847,578 |
|
|
$ |
104,610,294 |
|
|
$ |
92,009,500 |
|
Nonperforming
|
|
|
4,973,745 |
|
|
|
4,973,745 |
|
|
|
8,117,714 |
|
|
|
7,385,828 |
|
|
|
64,895 |
|
|
|
64,895 |
|
|
|
13,156,354 |
|
|
|
12,424,468 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$ |
48,640,505 |
|
|
$ |
41,653,009 |
|
|
$ |
55,147,389 |
|
|
$ |
49,868,486 |
|
|
$ |
13,978,754 |
|
|
$ |
12,912,473 |
|
|
$ |
117,766,648 |
|
|
$ |
104,433,968 |
|
Non-Accrual Mortgage Loans
Once a loan is past due 90 days, it is the Company’s policy to end the accrual of interest income on the loan and write off any income that had been accrued. Interest not accrued on these loans totals $565,000 and $678,000 as of March 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013, respectively.
The following is a summary of mortgage loans on a nonaccrual status for the periods presented.
|
|
Mortgage Loans on Nonaccrual Status
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of March 31
|
|
|
As of December 31
|
|
|
|
2014
|
|
|
2013
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial
|
|
$ |
4,973,745 |
|
|
$ |
4,973,745 |
|
Residential
|
|
|
8,117,714 |
|
|
|
7,385,828 |
|
Residential construction
|
|
|
64,895 |
|
|
|
64,895 |
|
Total
|
|
$ |
13,156,354 |
|
|
$ |
12,424,468 |
|
Loan Loss Reserve
The mortgage loan loss reserve is an estimate of probable losses at the balance sheet date that the Company will realize in the future on mortgage loans sold to third party investors.
The loan loss reserve analysis involves mortgage loans that have been sold to third party investors where the Company has received a demand from the investor. There are generally three types of demands: make whole, repurchase, or indemnification. These types of demands are more particularly described as follows:
Make whole demand – A make whole demand occurs when an investor forecloses on a property and then sells the property. The make whole amount is calculated as the difference between the original unpaid principal balance, accrued interest and fees, less the sale proceeds.
Repurchase demand – A repurchase demand usually occurs when there is a significant payment default, error in underwriting or detected loan fraud.
Indemnification demand – On certain loans the Company has negotiated a set fee that is to be paid in lieu of repurchase. The fee varies by investor and by loan product type.
SECURITY NATIONAL FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
March 31, 2014 (Unaudited)
3) Investments (Continued)
When a repurchase demand is received from a third party investor, the relevant data is reviewed and captured so that an estimated future loss can be calculated. The key factors that are used in the estimated loss calculation are as follows: (i) lien position, (ii) payment status, (iii) claim type, (iv) unpaid principal balance, (v) interest rate, and (vi) validity of the demand. Other data is captured and is useful for management purposes; the actual estimated loss is generally based on these key factors. The Company conducts its own review upon the receipt of a repurchase demand. In many instances, the Company is able to resolve the issues relating to the repurchase demand by the third party investor without having to make any payments to the investor.
The following is a summary of the loan loss reserve that is included in other liabilities and accrued expenses:
|
|
As of March 31
|
|
|
As of December 31
|
|
|
|
2014
|
|
|
2013
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, beginning of period
|
|
$ |
5,506,532 |
|
|
$ |
6,035,295 |
|
Provisions for losses
|
|
|
372,093 |
|
|
|
1,846,285 |
|
Charge-offs
|
|
|
(351,213 |
) |
|
|
(2,375,048 |
) |
Balance, end of period
|
|
$ |
5,527,412 |
|
|
$ |
5,506,532 |
|
The Company believes the loan loss reserve represents probable loan losses incurred as of the balance sheet date. The loan loss reserve may not be adequate, however, for claims asserted by third party investors. Actual loan loss experience could change, in the near-term, from the established reserve based upon claims asserted by third party investors. If SecurityNational Mortgage is unable to negotiate acceptable terms with the third party investors, legal action may ensue in an effort to obtain amounts that the third party investors claim are allegedly due. In the event of legal action, if SecurityNational Mortgage is not successful in its defenses against claims asserted by these third party investors to the extent that a substantial judgment is entered against SecurityNational Mortgage which is beyond its capacity to pay, SecurityNational Mortgage may be required to curtail or cease operations.
4) Stock-Based Compensation
The Company has three fixed option plans (the “2003 Plan”, the “2006 Plan” and the “2013 Plan”). Compensation expense for options issued of $64,325 and $52,969 has been recognized for these plans for the quarters ended March 31, 2014 and 2013, respectively. As of March 31, 2014, the total unrecognized compensation expense related to the options issued in December 2013 was $175,696, which is expected to be recognized over the vesting period of one year.
The Company generally estimates the expected life of the options based upon the contractual term of the options adjusted for actual experience. Future volatility is estimated based upon the a weighted historical volatility of the Company’s Class A common stock and three peer company stocks over a period equal to the estimated life of the options. Common stock issued upon exercise of stock options are generally new share issuances rather than from treasury shares.
SECURITY NATIONAL FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
March 31, 2014 (Unaudited)
4) Stock Based Compensation (Continued)
A summary of the status of the Company’s stock incentive plans as of March 31, 2014, and the changes during the three months ended March 31, 2014, is presented below:
|
|
Number of
Class A Shares
|
|
|
Weighted
Average
Exercise Price
|
|
|
Number of
Class C Shares(1)
|
|
|
Weighted
Average
Exercise Price(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at December 31, 2013
|
|
|
405,133 |
|
|
$ |
2.41 |
|
|
|
5,086,562 |
|
|
$ |
2.00 |
|
Granted
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
Exercised
|
|
|
(34,955 |
) |
|
|
1.44 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
Cancelled
|
|
|
(1,838 |
) |
|
|
2.92 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at March 31, 2014
|
|
|
368,340 |
|
|
$ |
2.50 |
|
|
|
5,086,562 |
|
|
$ |
2.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of March 31, 2014:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options exercisable
|
|
|
303,716 |
|
|
$ |
2.06 |
|
|
|
4,692,812 |
|
|
$ |
1.75 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of March 31, 2014:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Available options for future grant
|
|
|
314,480 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,050,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average contractual term of options outstanding at March 31, 2014
|
|
7.02 years
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.36 years
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average contractual term of options exercisable at March 31, 2014
|
|
6.45 years
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.17 years
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Aggregated intrinsic value of options outstanding at March 31, 2014
|
|
$ |
631,778 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1,098,384 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Aggregated intrinsic value of options exercisable at March 31, 2014
|
|
$ |
631,586 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1,098,384 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) Class “C” shares are converted to Class “A” shares on a 10 to 1 ratio. The Weighted Average Exercise Price is based on Class A Common shares.
|
The total intrinsic value (which is the amount by which the fair value of the underlying stock exceeds the exercise price of an option on the exercise date) of stock options exercised during the three months ended March 31, 2014 and 2013 was $-0- and $1,027,181, respectively. The Company used a stock price of $4.06 as of March 31, 2014 to derive intrinsic value.
5) Capital Stock
The Company has two classes of common stock with shares outstanding: Class A and Class C. Class C shares are convertible into Class A shares at any time on a ten to one ratio.
SECURITY NATIONAL FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
March 31, 2014 (Unaudited)
6) Earnings Per Share
The basic and diluted earnings per share amounts were calculated as follows:
|
|
Three Months Ended
March 31
|
|
|
|
2014
|
|
|
2013
|
|
Numerator:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net earnings
|
|
$ |
138,848 |
|
|
$ |
2,033,266 |
|
Denominator:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic weighted-average shares outstanding
|
|
|
11,786,353 |
|
|
|
11,613,952 |
|
Effect of dilutive securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Employee stock options
|
|
|
440,896 |
|
|
|
1,044,943 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted weighted-average shares outstanding
|
|
|
12,227,249 |
|
|
|
12,658,895 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic net earnings per share
|
|
$ |
0.01 |
|
|
$ |
0.18 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted net earnings per share
|
|
$ |
0.01 |
|
|
$ |
0.16 |
|
Net earnings per share amounts have been adjusted for the effect of annual stock dividends. For the three months ended March 31, 2014 and 2013, there were 615,472 and -0- of anti-dilutive employee stock option shares, respectively, that were not included in the computation of diluted net loss per common share as their effect would be anti-dilutive.
7) Business Segments
Description of Products and Services by Segment
The Company has three reportable business segments: life insurance, cemetery and mortuary, and mortgage. The Company’s life insurance segment consists of life insurance premiums and operating expenses from the sale of insurance products sold by the Company’s independent agency force and net investment income derived from investing policyholder and segment surplus funds. The Company’s cemetery and mortuary segment consists of revenues and operating expenses from the sale of at-need cemetery and mortuary merchandise and services at its mortuaries and cemeteries, pre-need sales of cemetery spaces after collection of 10% or more of the purchase price and the net investment income from investing segment surplus funds. The Company’s mortgage segment consists of loan fee income and expenses from the originations of residential and commercial mortgage loans and interest earned and interest expenses from warehousing pre-sold loans before the funds are received from financial institutional investors.
Measurement of Segment Profit or Loss and Segment Assets
The accounting policies of the reportable segments are the same as those described in the Significant Accounting Principles of the form 10K for the year ended December 31, 2013. Intersegment revenues are recorded at cost plus an agreed upon intercompany profit, and are eliminated upon consolidation.
Factors Management Used to Identify the Enterprise’s Reportable Segments
The Company’s reportable segments are business units that offer different products and are managed separately due to the different products and the need to report to the various regulatory jurisdictions.
SECURITY NATIONAL FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
March 31, 2014 (Unaudited)
7) Business Segments (Continued)
|
|
Life Insurance
|
|
|
Cemetery/
Mortuary
|
|
|
Mortgage
|
|
|
Reconciling Items
|
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
For the Three Months Ended March 31, 2014
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues from external customers
|
|
$ |
18,472,816 |
|
|
$ |
3,040,568 |
|
|
$ |
23,539,892 |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
45,053,276 |
|
Intersegment revenues
|
|
|
2,061,720 |
|
|
|
336,298 |
|
|
|
164,146 |
|
|
|
(2,562,164 |
) |
|
|
- |
|
Segment profit before income taxes
|
|
|
1,331,469 |
|
|
|
182,778 |
|
|
|
(1,348,260 |
) |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
165,987 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Identifiable Assets
|
|
|
604,260,546 |
|
|
|
108,627,471 |
|
|
|
49,375,595 |
|
|
|
(135,523,285 |
) |
|
|
626,740,327 |
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
391,848 |
|
|
|
285,191 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
677,039 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Three Months Ended March 31, 2013
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues from external customers
|
|
$ |
17,243,892 |
|
|
$ |
2,980,031 |
|
|
$ |
34,628,311 |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
54,852,234 |
|
Intersegment revenues
|
|
|
2,587,833 |
|
|
|
358,490 |
|
|
|
57,162 |
|
|
|
(3,003,485 |
) |
|
|
- |
|
Segment profit before income taxes
|
|
|
814,331 |
|
|
|
76,765 |
|
|
|
2,336,527 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
3,227,623 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Identifiable Assets
|
|
|
559,158,299 |
|
|
|
112,258,461 |
|
|
|
55,573,503 |
|
|
|
(125,819,039 |
) |
|
|
601,171,224 |
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
391,848 |
|
|
|
285,191 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
677,039 |
|
8) Fair Value of Financial Instruments
Generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) defines fair value as the exchange price that would be received for an asset or paid to transfer a liability (an exit price) in the principal or most advantageous market for the asset or liability in an orderly transaction between market participants. GAAP also specifies a fair value hierarchy based upon the observability of inputs used in valuation techniques. Observable inputs (highest level) reflect market data obtained from independent sources, while unobservable inputs (lowest level) reflect internally developed market assumptions. Fair value measurements are classified under the following hierarchy:
Level 1: Financial assets and financial liabilities whose values are based on unadjusted quoted prices for identical assets or liabilities in an active market that we can access.
Level 2: Financial assets and financial liabilities whose values are based on the following:
a) Quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets;
b) Quoted prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities in non-active markets; or
c) Valuation models whose inputs are observable, directly or indirectly, for substantially the full term of the asset or liability.
Level 3: Financial assets and financial liabilities whose values are based on prices or valuation techniques that require inputs that are both unobservable and significant to the overall fair value measurement. These inputs may reflect our estimates of the assumptions that market participants would use in valuing the financial assets and financial liabilities.
The Company utilizes a combination of third party valuation service providers, brokers, and internal valuation models to determine fair value.
SECURITY NATIONAL FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
March 31, 2014 (Unaudited)
8) Fair Value of Financial Instruments (Continued)
The following methods and assumptions were used by the Company in estimating the fair value disclosures related to other significant financial instruments:
The items shown under Level 1 and Level 2 are valued as follows:
Securities Available-for-sale and Held-to-Maturity: The fair values of investments in fixed maturity and equity securities along with methods used to estimate such values are disclosed in Note 3.
Restricted Assets: A portion of these assets include mutual funds and equity securities that have quoted market prices. Also included are cash and cash equivalents and participations in mortgage loans. The carrying amounts reported in the accompanying consolidated balance sheet for these financial instruments approximate their fair values.
Cemetery Perpetual Care Trust Investments: A portion of these assets include equity securities that have quoted market prices. Also included are cash and cash equivalents. The carrying amounts reported in the accompanying consolidated balance sheet for these financial instruments approximate their fair values.
Call Options: The Company uses quoted market prices to value its call options.
The items shown under Level 3 are valued as follows:
Policyholder Account Balances and Future Policy Benefits-Annuities: Future policy benefit reserves for interest-sensitive insurance products are computed under a retrospective deposit method and represent policy account balances before applicable surrender charges. Policy benefits and claims that are charged to expense include benefit claims incurred in the period in excess of related policy account balances. Interest crediting rates for interest-sensitive insurance products ranged from 4% to 6.5%. The fair values for the Company’s liabilities under investment-type insurance contracts (disclosed as policyholder account balances and future policy benefits – annuities) are estimated based on the contracts’ cash surrender values.
The fair values for the Company’s insurance contracts other than investment-type contracts are not required to be disclosed. However, the fair values of liabilities under all insurance contracts are taken into consideration in the Company’s overall management of interest rate risk, such that the Company’s exposure to changing interest rates is minimized through the matching of investment maturities with amounts due under insurance contracts.
Interest Rate Lock Commitments: The Company’s mortgage banking activities enters into interest rate lock commitments with potential borrowers and forward commitments to sell loans to third-party investors. The Company also implements a hedging strategy for these transactions. A mortgage loan commitment binds the Company to lend funds to a qualified borrower at a specified interest rate and within a specified period of time, generally up to 30 days after inception of the mortgage loan commitment. Mortgage loan commitments are defined to be derivatives under generally accepted accounting principles and are recognized at fair value on the consolidated balance sheet with changes in their fair values recorded as part of other comprehensive income from mortgage banking operations.
The Company estimates the fair value of a mortgage loan commitment based on the change in estimated fair value of the underlying mortgage loan and the probability that the mortgage loan will fund within the terms of the commitment. The change in fair value of the underlying mortgage loan is measured from the date the mortgage loan commitment is issued. Therefore, at the time of issuance, the estimated fair value is zero. Following issuance, the value of a mortgage loan commitment can be either positive or negative depending upon the change in value of the underlying mortgage loans. Fallout rates derived from the Company’s recent historical empirical data are used to estimate the quantity of mortgage loans that will fund within the terms of the commitments.
Bank Loan Interest Rate Swaps: Management considers the interest rate swap instruments to be an effective cash flow hedge against the variable interest rate on bank borrowings since the interest rate swap mirrors the term of the note payable and expires on the maturity date of the bank loan it hedges. The interest rate swaps are a derivative financial instruments carried at its fair value. The fair value of the interest rate swap was derived from a proprietary model of the bank from whom the interest rate swap was purchased and to whom the note is payable.
Mortgage Loans on Real Estate: The fair values are estimated using interest rates currently being offered for similar loans to borrowers with similar credit ratings. Loans with similar characteristics are aggregated for purposes of the calculations. The carrying amounts reported in the accompanying consolidated balance sheet for these financial instruments approximate their fair values.
SECURITY NATIONAL FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
March 31, 2014 (Unaudited)
8) Fair Value of Financial Instruments (Continued)
Real Estate Held for Investment: The Company believes that in an orderly market fair value will approximate the replacement cost of a home and the rental income provides a cash flow stream for investment analysis. The Company believes the highest and best use of the properties are as income producing assets since it is the Company’s intent to hold the properties as rental properties, matching the income from the investment in rental properties with the funds required for future estimated policy claims. Accordingly, the fair value determination will be weighted more heavily toward the rental analysis.
It should be noted that for replacement cost, when determining the fair value of mortgage properties, the Company uses Marshall and Swift, a provider of building cost information to the real estate construction industry. For the investment analysis, the Company uses market data based upon its real estate operation experience and projected the present value of the net rental income over seven years. The Company uses 60% of the projected cash flow analysis and 40% of the replacement cost to approximate fair value of the collateral.
In addition to this analysis performed by the Company, the Company depreciates Real Estate Held for Investment. This depreciation reduces the book value of these properties and lessens the exposure to the Company from further deterioration in real estate values.
Mortgage Servicing Rights: The Company initially recognizes MSRs at their estimated fair values derived from the net cash flows associated with the servicing contracts, where the Company assumes the obligation to service the loan in the sale transaction. The precise fair value of MSRs cannot be readily determined because MSRs are not actively traded in stand-alone markets. Considerable judgment is required to estimate the fair values of these assets and the exercise of such judgment can significantly affect the Company’s earnings.
The Company’s subsequent accounting for MSRs is based on the class of MSRs. The Company has identified two classes of MSRs: MSRs backed by mortgage loans with initial term of 30 years and MSRs backed by mortgage loans with initial term of 15 years. The Company distinguishes between these classes of MSRs due to their differing sensitivities to change in value as the result of changes in market. After being initially recorded at fair value, MSRs backed by mortgage loans are accounted for using the amortization method. MSR amortization is determined by amortizing the balance straight-line over an estimated nine year life.
The Company periodically assesses MSRs for impairment. Impairment occurs when the current fair value of the MSR falls below the asset’s carrying value (carrying value is the amortized cost reduced by any related valuation allowance). If MSRs are impaired, the impairment is recognized in current-period earnings and the carrying value of the MSRs is adjusted through a valuation allowance.
Management periodically reviews the various loan strata to determine whether the value of the MSRs in a given stratum is impaired and likely to recover. When management deems recovery of the value to be unlikely in the foreseeable future, a write-down of the cost of the MSRs for that stratum to its estimated recoverable value is charged to the valuation allowance.
SECURITY NATIONAL FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
March 31, 2014 (Unaudited)
8) Fair Value of Financial Instruments (Continued)
The following tables summarize Level 1, 2 and 3 financial assets and financial liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis by their classification in the condensed consolidated balance sheet at March 31, 2014.
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Quoted Prices in
Active Markets for
Identical Assets
(Level 1)
|
|
|
Significant
Observable
Inputs
(Level 2)
|
|
|
Significant
Unobservable
Inputs
(Level 3)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets accounted for at fair value on a recurring basis
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock
|
|
$ |
6,019,096 |
|
|
$ |
6,019,096 |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
Total securities available for sale
|
|
$ |
6,019,096 |
|
|
$ |
6,019,096 |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restricted assets of cemeteries and mortuaries
|
|
|
681,003 |
|
|
|
681,003 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
Cemetery perpetual care trust investments
|
|
|
685,376 |
|
|
|
685,376 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
Derivatives - interest rate lock commitments
|
|
|
1,974,488 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
1,974,488 |
|
Total assets accounted for at fair value on a recurring basis
|
|
$ |
9,359,963 |
|
|
$ |
7,385,475 |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
1,974,488 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities accounted for at fair value on a recurring basis
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Policyholder account balances
|
|
$ |
(47,842,949 |
) |
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
(47,842,949 |
) |
Future policy benefits - annuities
|
|
|
(64,873,893 |
) |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(64,873,893 |
) |
Derivatives - bank loan interest rate swaps
|
|
|
(51,458 |
) |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(51,458 |
) |
- call options
|
|
|
(131,227 |
) |
|
|
(131,227 |
) |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
- interest rate lock commitments
|
|
|
(37,317 |
) |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(37,317 |
) |
Total liabilities accounted for at fair value on a recurring basis
|
|
$ |
(112,936,844 |
) |
|
$ |
(131,227 |
) |
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
(112,805,617 |
) |
Following is a summary of changes in the consolidated balance sheet line items measured using level 3 inputs:
|
|
Policyholder
Account
Balances
|
|
|
Future Policy
Benefits - Annuities
|
|
|
Interest Rate
Lock Commitments
|
|
|
Bank Loan
Interest Rate
Swaps
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance - December 31, 2013
|
|
$ |
(48,000,668 |
) |
|
$ |
(65,052,928 |
) |
|
$ |
1,487,908 |
|
|
$ |
(58,310 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total gains (losses):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Included in earnings
|
|
|
157,719 |
|
|
|
179,035 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Included in other comprehensive income (loss)
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
449,263 |
|
|
|
6,852 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance - March 31, 2014
|
|
$ |
(47,842,949 |
) |
|
$ |
(64,873,893 |
) |
|
$ |
1,937,171 |
|
|
$ |
(51,458 |
) |
SECURITY NATIONAL FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
March 31, 2014 (Unaudited)
8) Fair Value of Financial Instruments (Continued)
The following tables summarize Level 1, 2 and 3 financial assets and financial liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis by their classification in the condensed consolidated balance sheet at December 31, 2013.
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Quoted Prices
in Active
Markets for
Identical Assets
(Level 1)
|
|
|
Significant
Observable
Inputs
(Level 2)
|
|
|
Significant
Unobservable
Inputs
(Level 3)
|
|
Assets accounted for at fair value on a recurring basis
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock
|
|
$ |
4,498,756 |
|
|
$ |
4,498,756 |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
Total securities available for sale
|
|
$ |
4,498,756 |
|
|
$ |
4,498,756 |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restricted assets of cemeteries and mortuaries
|
|
|
667,149 |
|
|
|
667,149 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
Cemetery perpetual care trust investments
|
|
|
695,616 |
|
|
|
695,616 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
Derivatives - interest rate lock commitments
|
|
|
1,511,111 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
1,511,111 |
|
Total assets accounted for at fair value on a recurring basis
|
|
$ |
7,372,632 |
|
|
$ |
5,861,521 |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
1,511,111 |
|
Liabilities accounted for at fair value on a recurring basis
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Policyholder account balances
|
|
$ |
(48,000,668 |
) |
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
(48,000,668 |
) |
Future policy benefits - annuities
|
|
|
(65,052,928 |
) |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(65,052,928 |
) |
Derivatives - bank loan interest rate swaps
|
|
|
(58,310 |
) |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(58,310 |
) |
- call options
|
|
|
(124,174 |
) |
|
|
(124,174 |
) |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
- interest rate lock commitment
|
|
|
(23,203 |
) |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(23,203 |
) |
Total liabilities accounted for at fair value on a recurring basis
|
|
$ |
(113,259,283 |
) |
|
$ |
(124,174 |
) |
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
(113,135,109 |
) |
Following is a summary of changes in the condensed consolidated balance sheet line items measured using level 3 inputs:
|
|
Policyholder
Account Balances
|
|
|
Future
Policy Benefits
- Annuities
|
|
|
Interest Rate
Lock Commitments
|
|
|
Bank Loan
Interest Rate
Swaps
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance - December 31, 2012
|
|
$ |
(49,746,337 |
) |
|
$ |
(65,171,687 |
) |
|
$ |
2,961,465 |
|
|
$ |
(93,572 |
) |
Total gains (losses):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Included in earnings
|
|
|
1,745,669 |
|
|
|
118,759 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
Included in other comprehensive income
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(1,473,557 |
) |
|
|
35,262 |
|
Balance - December 31, 2013
|
|
$ |
(48,000,668 |
) |
|
$ |
(65,052,928 |
) |
|
$ |
1,487,908 |
|
|
$ |
(58,310 |
) |
SECURITY NATIONAL FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
March 31, 2014 (Unaudited)
8) Fair Value of Financial Instruments (Continued)
The following tables summarize Level 1, 2 and 3 financial assets and financial liabilities measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis by their classification in the consolidated balance sheet at December 31, 2013.
|
|
|
|
|
Quoted Prices
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
in Active
|
|
|
Significant
|
|
|
Significant
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Markets for
|
|
|
Observable
|
|
|
Unobservable
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Identical Assets
|
|
|
Inputs
|
|
|
Inputs
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
(Level 1)
|
|
|
(Level 2)
|
|
|
(Level 3)
|
|
Assets accounted for at fair value on a nonrecurring basis
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage servicing rights
|
|
$ |
5,291,724 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
$ |
5,291,724 |
|
Mortgage loans on real estate
|
|
|
89,000 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
89,000 |
|
Real estate held for investment
|
|
|
660,784 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
660,784 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets accounted for at fair value on a nonrecurring basis
|
|
$ |
6,041,508 |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
6,041,508 |
|
Fair Value of Financial Instruments Carried at Other Than Fair Value
ASC 825, Financial Instruments, requires disclosure of fair value information about financial instruments, whether or not recognized in the balance sheet, for which it is practicable to estimate that value.
Management uses its best judgment in estimating the fair value of the Company’s financial instruments; however, there are inherent limitations in any estimation technique. Therefore, for substantially all financial instruments, the fair value estimates presented herein are not necessarily indicative of the amounts the Company could have realized in a sales transaction at March 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013. The estimated fair value amounts for March 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013 have been measured as of period-end, and have not been reevaluated or updated for purposes of these Consolidated Financial Statements subsequent to those dates. As such, the estimated fair values of these financial instruments subsequent to the reporting date may be different than the amounts reported at period-end.
The carrying values and estimated fair values for such financial instruments, and their corresponding placement in the fair value hierarchy, are summarized as follows as of March 31, 2014:
|
|
Carrying Value
|
|
|
Level 1
|
|
|
Level 2
|
|
|
Level 3
|
|
|
Total Estimated
Fair Value
|
|
Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage loans:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential
|
|
$ |
53,745,478 |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
57,349,091 |
|
|
$ |
57,349,091 |
|
Residential construction
|
|
|
13,878,640 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
13,878,640 |
|
|
|
13,878,640 |
|
Commercial
|
|
|
48,453,376 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
50,550,929 |
|
|
|
50,550,929 |
|
Mortgage loans, net
|
|
$ |
116,077,494 |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
121,778,660 |
|
|
$ |
121,778,660 |
|
Policy loans
|
|
|
7,408,878 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
7,408,878 |
|
|
|
7,408,878 |
|
Other loans
|
|
|
14,991,666 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
14,991,666 |
|
|
|
14,991,666 |
|
Short-term investments
|
|
|
16,818,276 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
16,818,276 |
|
|
|
16,818,276 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bank and other loans payable
|
|
$ |
17,672,817 |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
17,672,817 |
|
|
$ |
17,672,817 |
|
SECURITY NATIONAL FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
March 31, 2014 (Unaudited)
8) Fair Value of Financial Instruments (Continued)
The carrying values and estimated fair values for such financial instruments, and their corresponding placement in the fair value hierarchy, are summarized as follows as of December 31, 2013:
|
|
Carrying Value
|
|
|
Level 1
|
|
|
Level 2
|
|
|
Level 3
|
|
|
Total Estimated
Fair Value
|
|
Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage loans:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential
|
|
$ |
48,503,639 |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
51,537,154 |
|
|
$ |
51,537,154 |
|
Residential construction
|
|
|
12,812,359 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
12,812,359 |
|
|
|
12,812,359 |
|
Commercial
|
|
|
41,465,880 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
42,441,268 |
|
|
|
42,441,268 |
|
Mortgage loans, net
|
|
$ |
102,781,878 |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
106,790,781 |
|
|
$ |
106,790,781 |
|
Policy loans
|
|
|
7,520,376 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
7,520,376 |
|
|
|
7,520,376 |
|
Other loans
|
|
|
12,203,630 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
12,203,630 |
|
|
|
12,203,630 |
|
Short-term investments
|
|
|
12,135,719 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
12,135,719 |
|
|
|
12,135,719 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bank and other loans payable
|
|
$ |
18,231,128 |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
18,231,128 |
|
|
$ |
18,231,128 |
|
The methods, assumptions and significant valuation techniques and inputs used to estimate the fair value of financial instruments are summarized as follows:
Mortgage Loans on Real Estate: The estimated fair value of the Company’s mortgage loans is determined using various methods. The Company’s mortgage loans are grouped into three categories: Residential, Residential Construction and Commercial. When estimating the expected future cash flows, it is assumed that all loans will be held to maturity, and any loans that are non-performing are evaluated individually for impairment.
Residential – The estimated fair value of mortgage loans originated prior to 2013 is determined by estimating expected future cash flows of interest payments and discounting them using current interest rates from single family mortgages. The estimated fair value of mortgage loans originated in 2013 is determined from pricing of similar loans that were sold in December 2013.
Residential Construction – These loans are primarily short in maturity (4-6 months) accordingly, the estimated fair value is determined to be the net book value.
Commercial – The estimated fair value is determined by estimating expected future cash flows of interest payments and discounting them using current interest rates for commercial mortgages.
Policy and Other Loans: The carrying amounts reported in the accompanying consolidated balance sheet for these financial instruments approximate their fair values.
Short-Term Investments: The carrying amounts reported in the accompanying consolidated balance sheet for these financial instruments approximate their fair values.
Bank and Other Loans Payable: The carrying amounts reported in the accompanying consolidated balance sheet for these financial instruments approximate their fair values.
SECURITY NATIONAL FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
March 31, 2014 (Unaudited)
9)Allowance for Doubtful Accounts, Allowance for Loan Losses and Impaired Loans
The Company records an allowance and recognizes an expense for potential losses from mortgage loans, other loans and receivables in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles.
The allowance for doubtful accounts is based upon the Company’s historical experience for collectively evaluated impairment. Other allowances are based upon receivables individually evaluated for impairment. Collectability of the cemetery and mortuary receivables is significantly influenced by current economic conditions. The critical issues that impact recovery of mortgage loan operations are interest rate risk, loan underwriting, new regulations and the overall economy.
The Company also provides an allowance for losses on its mortgage loans held for investment. The allowance is comprised of two components. The first component is an allowance for collectively evaluated impairment that is based upon the Company’s historical experience in collecting its unpaid principal balances. The second component is based upon individual evaluation of loans that are determined to be impaired. Upon determining impairment the Company establishes an individual impairment allowance based upon an assessment of the fair value of the underlying collateral. See the schedules in Note 3 for additional information. All expenses for foreclosure are expensed as incurred. Once foreclosed, an adjustment for the lower of cost or fair value is made, if necessary, and the amount is classified as other real estate owned held for investment or sale. The Company rents these properties until it is deemed desirable to sell them.
The allowance for loan losses could change based on changes in the value of the underlying collateral, the performance status of the loans, or the Company’s actual collection experience. The actual losses could change, in the near term, from the established allowance, based upon the occurrence or non-occurrence of these events.
10) Derivative Commitments
The Company is exposed to price risk due to the potential impact of changes in interest rates on the values of mortgage loan commitments from the time a derivative loan commitment is made to an applicant to the time the loan that would result from the exercise of that loan commitment is funded. Managing price risk is complicated by the fact that the ultimate percentage of derivative loan commitments that will be exercised (i.e., the number of loan commitments that will be funded) fluctuates. The probability that a loan will not be funded within the terms of the commitment is driven by a number of factors, particularly the change, if any, in mortgage rates following the inception of the interest rate lock. However, many borrowers continue to exercise derivative loan commitments even when interest rates have fallen.
In general, the probability of funding increases if mortgage rates rise and decreases if mortgage rates fall. This is due primarily to the relative attractiveness of current mortgage rates compared to the applicant’s committed rate. The probability that a loan will not be funded within the terms of the mortgage loan commitment also is influenced by the source of the applications (retail, broker or correspondent channels), proximity to rate lock expiration, purpose for the loan (purchase or refinance) product type and the application approval status. The Company has developed fallout estimates using historical data that take into account all of the variables, as well as renegotiations of rate and point commitments that tend to occur when mortgage rates fall. These fallout estimates are used to estimate the number of loans that the Company expects to be funded within the terms of the mortgage loan commitments and are updated periodically to reflect the most current data.
The Company estimates the fair value of a mortgage loan commitment based on the change in estimated fair value of the underlying mortgage loan and the probability that the mortgage loan will fund within the terms of the commitment. The change in fair value of the underlying mortgage loan is measured from the date the mortgage loan commitment is issued. Following issuance, the value of a mortgage loan commitment can be either an asset or liability depending upon the change in value of the underlying mortgage loans. Fallout rates derived from the Company’s recent historical empirical data are used to estimate the quantity of mortgage loans that will fund within the terms of the commitments.
SECURITY NATIONAL FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
March 31, 2014 (Unaudited)
10) Derivative Commitments (Continued)
The Company utilizes forward loan sales commitments to economically hedge the price risk associated with its outstanding mortgage loan commitments. A forward loan sales commitment protects the Company from losses on sales of the loans arising from exercise of the loan commitments by securing the ultimate sales price and delivery date of the loans. Management expects these derivatives will experience changes in fair value opposite to changes in fair value of the derivative loan commitments, thereby reducing earnings volatility related to the recognition in earnings of changes in the values of the commitments.
The Company has adopted a strategy of selling “out of the money” call options on its available for sale equity securities as a source of revenue. The options give the purchaser the right to buy from the Company specified equity securities at a set price up to a pre-determined date in the future. The Company receives an immediate payment of cash for the value of the option and establishes a liability for the fair value of the option. The liability for call options is adjusted to fair value at each reporting date. The fair value of outstanding call options as of March 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013 was $131,227 and $126,215, respectively. In the event an option is exercised, the Company recognizes a gain on the sale of the equity security and a gain from the sale of the option. If the option expires unexercised, the Company recognizes a gain from the sale of the option and retains the underlying equity security.
The following table shows the fair value of derivatives as of March 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013.
|
|
Fair Value of Derivative Instruments
|
|
|
|
Asset Derivatives
|
|
Liability Derivatives
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2014
|
|
|
December 31, 2013
|
|
March 31, 2014
|
|
December 31, 2013
|
|
|
|
Balance
Sheet Location
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
Balance
Sheet Location
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
Balance
Sheet Location
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
Balance
Sheet Location
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
Derivatives designated as hedging instruments:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate lock and forward sales commitments
|
|
other assets
|
|
|
$ |
1,974,488 |
|
|
other assets
|
|
|
$ |
1,511,111 |
|
Other liabilities
|
|
$ |
37,317 |
|
Other liabilities
|
|
$ |
23,203 |
|
Call Options
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
-- |
|
Other liabilities
|
|
|
131,227 |
|
Other liabilities
|
|
|
124,174 |
|
Interest rate swaps
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
-- |
|
|
|
-- |
|
Bank loans payable
|
|
|
51,458 |
|
Bank loans payable
|
|
|
58,310 |
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1,974,488 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1,511,111 |
|
|
|
$ |
220,002 |
|
|
|
$ |
205,687 |
|
The following table shows the gain (loss) on derivatives for the periods presented. There were no gains or losses reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income (OCI) into income or gains or losses recognized in income on derivatives ineffective portion or any amounts excluded from effective testing.
|
|
Net Amount Gain (Loss) Recognized in OCI
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31
|
|
Derivative - Cash Flow Hedging Relationships:
|
|
2014
|
|
|
2013
|
|
Interest Rate Lock Commitments
|
|
$ |
449,263 |
|
|
$ |
(715,724 |
) |
Interest Rate Swaps
|
|
|
6,852 |
|
|
|
9,117 |
|
Sub Total
|
|
|
456,115 |
|
|
|
(706,607 |
) |
Tax Effect
|
|
|
177,885 |
|
|
|
(127,960 |
) |
Total
|
|
$ |
278,230 |
|
|
$ |
(578,647 |
) |
SECURITY NATIONAL FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
March 31, 2014 (Unaudited)
11) Reinsurance, Commitments and Contingencies
Reinsurance Terminated with North America Life Insurance Company
On December 1, 2013, in accordance with the terms of the Coinsurance Agreement, Security National Life, through TransWestern Life Insurance Company (“Trans-Western Life”), recaptured additional policies of Trans-Western Life from North America Life Insurance Company (“North America Life”). On December 10, 2013, pursuant to the Coinsurance Agreement, North America Life paid $2,500,000, less a ceding commission of $34,000 to Security National Life. On February 13, 2014, in accordance with the terms of the Coinsurance Agreement, Security National Life, through Trans Western Life, recaptured the remaining policies of Trans-Western Life from North America Life. Pursuant to the Coinsurance Agreement, North America Life paid $4,684,000 less a ceding commission of $57,000 to Security National Life, and the Reinsurance Agreement between Trans Western Life and North America Life was terminated.
Mortgage Loan Loss Settlements
Future loan losses are extremely difficult to estimate, especially in the current market. However, management believes that the Company’s reserve methodology allow it to estimate its losses on loans sold. The amounts accrued for loan losses for the three months ended March 31, 2014 and 2013 were $372,000 and $537,000, respectively. The estimated liability for indemnification losses is included in other liabilities and accrued expenses and, as of March 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013, the balances were $5,527,000 and $5,507,000, respectively.
Settlement with Wells Fargo
On April 7, 2011, SecurityNational Mortgage entered into a settlement agreement with Wells Fargo Funding, Inc. (“Wells Fargo Funding”). The settlement agreement provides that it is intended to be a pragmatic commercial accommodation between SecurityNational Mortgage and Wells Fargo Funding and is not to be construed as an admission of responsibility, liability or fault for either party’s claims. Under the terms of the settlement agreement, SecurityNational Mortgage paid an initial settlement amount to Wells Fargo Funding in the amount of $4,300,000.
SecurityNational Mortgage is also required under the settlement agreement to set aside 10 basis points (.0010) during the period from April 8, 2011 to March 31, 2017 from the purchase proceeds of any loans that it sells to any mortgage loan purchaser, including Wells Fargo Funding, and pay such amounts to Wells Fargo Funding. SecurityNational Mortgage is additionally required under the settlement agreement to set aside 50% from the net proceeds that it receives from any sale, liquidation or other transfer of certain real estate properties that it owns, after subtracting taxes, commissions, recording fees and other transaction costs. These real estate properties consist of 27 real estate properties with a total book value as of March 31, 2014 of $4,675,000.
In consideration for SecurityNational Mortgage making the initial settlement payment to Wells Fargo Funding, Wells Fargo Funding and related parties, including Wells Fargo Bank, released SecurityNational Mortgage and related parties, including the Company and Security National Life, from any claims, demands, damages, obligations, liabilities, or causes of action relating to residential mortgage loans that Wells Fargo Funding purchased from SecurityNational Mortgage prior to December 31, 2009. Similarly, SecurityNational Mortgage released Wells Fargo Funding and its related parties from any claims, demands, damages, obligations, liabilities, or causes of actions relating to residential mortgage loans that Wells Fargo Funding purchased from SecurityNational Mortgage prior to December 31, 2009.
Mortgage Loan Loss Demands
Third Party Investors
There have been assertions in third party investor correspondence that SecurityNational Mortgage sold mortgage loans that allegedly contained borrower misrepresentations or experienced early payment defaults, or that were otherwise allegedly defective or not in compliance with agreements between SecurityNational Mortgage and the third party investors consisting principally of financial institutions. As a result of these claims, third party investors have made demands that SecurityNational Mortgage repurchase certain alleged defective mortgage loans that were sold to such investors or indemnify them against any losses related to such loans.
SECURITY NATIONAL FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
March 31, 2014 (Unaudited)
11) Reinsurance, Commitments and Contingencies (Continued)
The total amount of potential claims by third party investors is difficult to determine. The Company has reserved and accrued $5,522,000 as of March 31, 2014 to settle all such investor related claims. The Company believes that the reserve for mortgage loan loss, which includes provisions for probable losses and indemnification on mortgage loans sold to investors, is reasonable based on available information. Moreover, the Company has successfully negotiated acceptable settlement terms with other third party investors that asserted claims for mortgage loan losses against SecurityNational Mortgage.
SecurityNational Mortgage disagrees with the repurchase demands and notices of potential claims from third party investors and believes it has significant defenses to these demands. If SecurityNational Mortgage is unable to resolve the alleged claims by the third party investors on acceptable terms, legal action may ensue. In the event of legal action, if SecurityNational Mortgage is not successful in its defenses against claims asserted by these third party investors to the extent that a substantial judgment is entered against SecurityNational Mortgage which is beyond its capacity to pay, SecurityNational Mortgage may be required to curtail or cease operations.
JP Morgan Chase Indemnification Demand
The Company and its wholly owned subsidiary, SecurityNational Mortgage, received a notice of claim for indemnification dated December 21, 2011, from JP Morgan Chase & Co. (“JP Morgan Chase”) on behalf of EMC Mortgage, LLC (“EMC Mortgage”), relating to 21 mortgage loans that EMC Mortgage allegedly purchased as a third party investor from SecurityNational Mortgage. The notice also referenced a guaranty agreement, dated February 23, 2006, by the Company for the benefit of EMC Mortgage. The indemnification notice additionally stated that EMC Mortgage had been named in a lawsuit by the Bear Stearns Mortgage Funding Trust 2007-AR2 (the “Trust”), which was filed on September 13, 2011 in the Delaware Court of Chancery.
The lawsuit the Trust brought against EMC Mortgage contends that more than 800 residential mortgage loans that EMC Mortgage sold to the Trust (including the 21 loans allegedly originated by SecurityNational Mortgage) contained breaches of representations and warranties with respect to the mortgage loans, as well as defaults and foreclosures in many of such loans. As a result of the alleged breaches of representations and warranties by EMC Mortgage, the complaint requests that EMC Mortgage be ordered to repurchase from the Trust any loans for which it breached its representations and warranties, in the amount of the mortgage loans’ outstanding principal balance and all accrued but unpaid interest.
The indemnification notice from JP Morgan Chase further alleged that the Company and SecurityNational Mortgage are required to indemnify EMC Mortgage for any of its losses arising from the lawsuit that the Trust brought against EMC based upon allegedly untrue statements of material fact related to information that was provided by SecurityNational Mortgage. To the extent the claims in the complaint relate to the 21 mortgage loans that SecurityNational Mortgage allegedly sold to EMC Mortgage, the Company believes it has significant defenses to such claims. The Company intends to vigorously defend itself and SecurityNational Mortgage in the event that JP Morgan Chase were to bring any legal action to require the Company or SecurityNational Mortgage to indemnify it for any loss, liability or expense in connection with the lawsuit that the Trust has brought against EMC Mortgage.
Mortgage Loan Loss Litigation
Lehman Brothers - Aurora Loan Services Litigation
On April 15, 2005, SecurityNational Mortgage entered into a loan purchase agreement with Lehman Brothers Bank, FSB (“Lehman Bank”). Under the terms of the loan purchase agreement, Lehman Bank agreed to purchase mortgage loans from time to time from SecurityNational Mortgage. During 2007, Lehman Bank and its wholly owned subsidiary, Aurora Loan Services LLC (“Aurora Loan Services”), purchased a total of 1,490 mortgage loans in the aggregate amount of $352,774,000 from SecurityNational Mortgage. Lehman Bank asserted that certain of the mortgage loans that it purchased from SecurityNational Mortgage during 2007 contained alleged misrepresentations and early payment defaults. As a result of these alleged issues with the mortgage loans, Lehman Bank contended it had the right to require SecurityNational Mortgage to repurchase certain loans or be liable for losses related to such loans under the loan purchase agreement. SecurityNational Mortgage disagrees with these claims.
SECURITY NATIONAL FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
March 31, 2014 (Unaudited)
11) Reinsurance, Commitments and Contingencies (Continued)
On December 17, 2007, SecurityNational Mortgage entered into an Indemnification Agreement with Lehman Bank and Aurora Loan Services. Under the terms of the Indemnification Agreement, SecurityNational Mortgage agreed to indemnify Lehman Bank and Aurora Loan Services for 75% of all losses that Lehman Bank and Aurora Loan Services may incur relative to breaches by mortgagors pertaining to 55 mortgage loans that were purchased from SecurityNational Mortgage. SecurityNational Mortgage was released from any obligation to pay the remaining 25% of such losses. The Indemnification Agreement also required SecurityNational Mortgage to indemnify Lehman Bank and Aurora Loan Services for 100% of any future losses incurred on mortgage loans with breaches that were not among the 55 mortgage loans.
Pursuant to the Indemnification Agreement, SecurityNational Mortgage paid $395,000 to Aurora Loan Services as a deposit into a reserve account, to secure any obligations of SecurityNational Mortgage under the Indemnification Agreement. This deposit was in addition to a $250,000 deposit that SecurityNational Mortgage previously made into the reserve account for a total of $645,000. Losses from mortgage loans with alleged breaches were payable from the reserve account. However, Lehman Bank and Aurora Loan Services were not to apply any funds from the reserve account to a particular mortgage loan until an actual loss had occurred. Under the Indemnification Agreement SecurityNational Mortgage was to pay to Aurora Loan Services each calendar month the difference between the reserve account balance and $645,000, but in no event would SecurityNational Mortgage be required to make payments into the reserve account in excess of $125,000 for any calendar month.
Since the time the reserve account was established, SecurityNational Mortgage paid a total of $4,281,000 from the reserve account to indemnify Lehman Brothers Bank and Aurora Loan Services for alleged losses from 31 mortgage loans that were among 55 mortgage loans with alleged breaches that were covered by the Indemnification Agreement and ten other mortgage loans with alleged breaches. In the last monthly billing statement dated April 24, 2011 to SecurityNational Mortgage, Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc. (“Lehman Holdings”) claimed that SecurityNational Mortgage owed approximately $3,745,000 for mortgage loan losses under the Indemnification Agreement.
During 2010 and 2011, the Company recognized alleged losses of $1,289,000 and $-0-, respectively. However, management cannot fully determine the total losses because there could be potential claims for losses that have not yet been determined. As of March 31, 2014, the Company had not accrued for any losses under the Indemnification Agreement. SecurityNational Mortgage was involved in discussions with Lehman Bank and Lehman Holdings concerning issues under the Indemnification Agreement. During the discussion period, monthly payments for December 2010 and January, February, March and April of 2011 totaling $625,000 were abated or deferred.
On May 11, 2011, SecurityNational Mortgage filed a complaint against Aurora Bank FSB, formerly known as Lehman Bank, and Aurora Loan Services in the United States District Court for the District of Utah because it had been unable to resolve certain issues under the Indemnification Agreement. The complaint alleges, among other things, material breach of the Indemnification Agreement, including a claim that neither Lehman Bank nor Aurora Loan Services owned mortgage loans sold by SecurityNational to justify the amount of payments demanded from, and made by SecurityNational Mortgage. As a result, SecurityNational Mortgage claims it is entitled to judgment of approximately $4,000,000 against Lehman Bank, as well as Aurora Loan Services to the extent of its involvement and complicity with Lehman Bank. The complaint also alleges a second claim for material breach of a section of the Indemnification Agreement that contains an alleged “sunset” provision and that the amount of the requested payments made was not justified under the “sunset” provision.
On June 8, 2011, Lehman Holdings, which had filed for bankruptcy in September 2008, filed a complaint against SecurityNational Mortgage in the United States District Court for the District of Utah. A Lehman Holdings’ subsidiary owns Lehman Bank. The complaint alleges that SecurityNational Mortgage sold loans to Lehman Bank, which were then sold to Lehman Holdings. The complaint additionally alleges that Lehman Bank and Aurora Loan Services assigned their rights and remedies under the loan purchase agreement, as well as the Indemnification Agreement to Lehman Holdings, which latter assignment purportedly took place on March 28, 2011. Lehman Holdings declared in a letter dated June 2, 2011 that the Indemnification Agreement was null and void except for losses previously released and discharged, which is disputed by SecurityNational Mortgage.
SECURITY NATIONAL FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
March 31, 2014 (Unaudited)
11) Reinsurance, Commitments and Contingencies (Continued)
Lehman Holdings’ alleged claims are for damages for breach of contract and breach of warranty pursuant to a loan purchase agreement and Seller’s Guide. Based on claiming that the Indemnification Agreement is null and void pursuant to its lawsuit, Lehman Holdings has initially claimed damages in excess of $5,000,000. Prior to declaring the Indemnification Agreement null and void, Lehman Holdings claimed in a then recent billing statement under the terms of the Indemnification Agreement, that SecurityNational Mortgage owed approximately $3,745,000 for mortgage loan losses under the Indemnification Agreement. SecurityNational Mortgage strongly disagrees with the position of Lehman Holdings and, as set forth in its May 11, 2011 complaint, seeks affirmative relief of approximately $4,000,000 from Lehman Bank and Aurora Loan Services, which are related to Lehman Holdings.
On September 4, 2012, SecurityNational Mortgage filed a motion for summary judgment in its action against Lehman Bank and Aurora Loan Services on certain material issues, as well as against Lehman Holdings regarding its claims against SecurityNational Mortgage. Lehman Bank and Aurora Loan Services filed a cross motion for summary judgment as to the issues in SecurityNational Mortgage’s motion and, in the Lehman Holdings case, Lehman Holdings has requested that the Court allow a cross motion on the issues which are the subject of SecurityNational Mortgage’s September 4, 2012 motion. The cases are before two different federal judges.
On February 27, 2013, SecurityNational Mortgage’s motion for summary judgment against Lehman Bank and Aurora Loan Services and the related cross motion were heard by Judge David Nuffer of the United States District Court for the District of Utah. After an extensive hearing, Judge Nuffer requested that the parties prepare findings of fact in accordance with the Court’s earlier promulgated findings as modified at the hearing, and that each party submit proposed conclusions of law related to the motions. Judge Nuffer also said that he may request a further hearing on the matter. The motion and cross motion were taken under advisement. SecurityNational Mortgage’s motion in the Lehman Holdings case was heard on April 22, 2014 before Judge Ted Stewart of the United States District Court for the District of Utah, and is under advisement. A trial, as may be necessary, is set for August 11, 2014.
On May 6, 2014, Judge Nuffer issued his “Summary of Facts, Conclusions of Law and Order Granting SecurityNational’s Motion for Summary Judgment,” in which he granted SecurityNational Mortgage’s motion for summary judgment and denied the cross motion of Aurora Bank (formerly known as Lehman Brothers Bank) and Aurora Loan Services. A hearing is set for June 2, 2014 to determine the amount that is owing to SecurityNational Mortgage. On May 7, 2014, Judge Stewart issued an order for supplemental briefing on how Judge Nuffer’s order may affect SecurityNational Mortgage’s motion for summary judgment in the Lehman Holdings case.
Other Contingencies and Commitments
The Company has entered into commitments to fund new residential construction loans. As of March 31, 2014, the Company’s commitments were $21,581,000 for these loans of which $13,979,000 had been funded. The Company will advance funds once the work has been completed and an independent inspection is made. The maximum loan commitment ranges between 50% and 80% of appraised value. The Company receives fees from the borrowers and the interest rate is generally 2% to 6.75% over the bank prime rate (3.25% as of March 31, 2014). Maturities range between six and twelve months.
The Company is not a party to any other material legal proceedings outside the ordinary course of business or to any other legal proceedings, which, if adversely determined, would have a material adverse effect on its financial condition or results of operations.
SECURITY NATIONAL FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
March 31, 2014 (Unaudited)
12) Mortgage Servicing Rights
The following is a summary of the MSR activity for the periods presented.
|
|
As of March 31
|
|
|
As of December 31
|
|
|
|
2014
|
|
|
2013
|
|
Amortized cost:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance before valuation allowance at beginning of year
|
|
$ |
4,844,101 |
|
|
$ |
2,797,470 |
|
MSRs proceeds from loan sales
|
|
|
461,301 |
|
|
|
2,494,254 |
|
Amortization
|
|
|
(151,907 |
) |
|
|
(447,623 |
) |
Application of valuation allowance to write down MSRs with other than temporary impairment
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
Balance before valuation allowance at year end
|
|
$ |
5,153,495 |
|
|
$ |
4,844,101 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Valuation allowance for impairment of MSRs:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at beginning of year
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
Additions
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
Application of valuation allowance to write down MSRs with other than temporary impairment
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
Balance at end of period
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage servicing rights, net
|
|
$ |
5,153,495 |
|
|
$ |
4,844,101 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Estimated fair value of MSRs at end of period
|
|
$ |
5,737,372 |
|
|
$ |
5,491,270 |
|
The Company reports these MSRs pursuant to the accounting policy discussed in Note 8 and Note 9. The following table summarizes the Company’s estimate of future amortization of its existing MSRs carried at amortized cost. This projection was developed using the assumptions made by management in its March 31, 2014 valuation of MSRs. The assumptions underlying the following estimate will change as market conditions and portfolio composition and behavior change, causing both actual and projected amortization levels to change over time. Therefore, the estimates will change in a manner and amount not presently determinable by management.
Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.
Overview
The Company’s operations over the last several years generally reflect three trends or events which the Company expects to continue: (i) increased attention to “niche” insurance products, such as the Company’s funeral plan policies and traditional whole life products; (ii) emphasis on cemetery and mortuary business; and (iii) capitalizing on relatively low interest rates by originating mortgage loans.
Results of Operations
Insurance Operations
The Company’s insurance business includes funeral plans, interest sensitive life insurance, as well as other traditional life and accident insurance, and health insurance products. The Company places specific marketing emphasis on funeral plans through pre-need planning.
A funeral plan is a small face value life insurance policy that generally has face coverage of up to $25,000. The Company believes that funeral plans represent a marketing niche that has lower competition because most insurance companies do not offer similar coverage. The purpose of the funeral plan policy is to pay the costs and expenses incurred at the time of the person’s death. On a per thousand dollar cost of insurance basis these policies can be more expensive to the policy holder than many types of non-burial insurance due to their low face amount, requiring the fixed cost of the policy administration be distributed over a smaller policy size, and the simplified underwriting practices that result in higher mortality costs.
The following table shows the condensed financial results of the insurance operations for the three months ended March 31, 2014 and 2013. See Note 7 to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
|
|
Three months ended March 31
(in thousands of dollars)
|
|
|
|
2014
|
|
|
2013
|
|
|
% Increase (Decrease)
|
|
Revenues from external customers
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Insurance premiums
|
|
$ |
13,129 |
|
|
$ |
12,422 |
|
|
|
6 |
% |
Net investment income
|
|
|
4,827 |
|
|
|
3,841 |
|
|
|
26 |
% |
Income from loan originations
|
|
|
343 |
|
|
|
85 |
|
|
|
304 |
% |
Other
|
|
|
174 |
|
|
|
896 |
|
|
|
(81 |
%) |
Total
|
|
$ |
18,473 |
|
|
$ |
17,244 |
|
|
|
7 |
% |
Intersegment revenue
|
|
$ |
2,062 |
|
|
$ |
2,588 |
|
|
|
(20 |
%) |
Earnings before income taxes
|
|
$ |
1,331 |
|
|
$ |
814 |
|
|
|
64 |
% |
Intersegment revenues are primarily interest income from the warehouse line provided to SecurityNational Mortgage Company. Profitability in the three months ended March 31, 2014 has increased due to an increase in net investment income, an increase in income from loan originations and an increase in insurance premiums.
Cemetery and Mortuary Operations
The Company sells mortuary services and products through its seven mortuaries in Salt Lake City, Utah and one mortuary in Phoenix, Arizona. The Company also sells cemetery products and services through its five cemeteries in Salt Lake City, Utah and one cemetery in San Diego County, California. Cemetery land sales and at-need product sales and services are recognized as revenue at the time of sale or when the services are performed. Pre-need cemetery product sales are deferred until the merchandise is delivered and services performed.
The following table shows the condensed financial results of the Cemetery and Mortuary operations for the three months ended March 31, 2014 and 2013. See Note 7 to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
|
|
Three months ended March 31,
(in thousands of dollars)
|
|
|
|
2014
|
|
|
2013
|
|
|
% Increase (Decrease)
|
|
Revenues from external customers
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortuary revenues
|
|
$ |
1,319 |
|
|
$ |
1,358 |
|
|
|
(3 |
%) |
Cemetery revenues
|
|
|
1,635 |
|
|
|
1,637 |
|
|
|
0 |
% |
Other
|
|
|
87 |
|
|
|
(15 |
) |
|
|
(680 |
%) |
Total
|
|
$ |
3,041 |
|
|
$ |
2,980 |
|
|
|
2 |
% |
Earnings before income taxes
|
|
$ |
183 |
|
|
$ |
77 |
|
|
|
138 |
% |
Included in other revenue is rental income from residential and commercial properties purchased from Security National Life. Memorial Estates purchased these properties from financing provided by Security National Life. The rental income is offset by property insurance, taxes, maintenance expenses and interest payments made to Security National Life. Memorial Estates has recorded depreciation on these properties of $253,000 and $260,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2014 and 2013, respectively.
Mortgage Operations
Overview
The Company’s wholly owned subsidiaries, SecurityNational Mortgage Company and Green Street Mortgage Services, Inc., are mortgage lenders incorporated under the laws of the State of Utah, and are approved and regulated by the Federal Housing Administration (FHA), a department of the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD), to originate mortgage loans that qualify for government insurance in the event of default by the borrower. SecurityNational Mortgage and Green Street obtain loans from their retail offices and independent brokers. Mortgage loans originated by the Company’s mortgage subsidiaries are funded from internal cash flows, including loan purchase agreements from Security National Life Insurance Company, its wholly owned subsidiary, and unaffiliated financial institutions.
SecurityNational Mortgage and Green Street Mortgage receive fees from the borrowers and secondary fees from third party investors that purchase their loans. Loans originated by SecurityNational Mortgage and Green Street Mortgage are generally sold with mortgage servicing rights released to third party investors. However, since the second quarter of 2012, SecurityNational Mortgage has sold, but retained mortgage servicing rights on approximately 30% of its origination volume. The majority of these loans are serviced by an approved third party sub-servicer.
For the three months ended March 31, 2014 and 2013, SecurityNational Mortgage originated and sold 2,034 loans ($370,192,000 total volume) and 2,895 loans ($536,606,000 total volume), respectively. For the three months ended March 31, 2014, Green Street Mortgage originated and sold four loans ($1,045,000 total volume). Green Street Mortgage did not originate and sell any mortgage loans prior to November 2013.
The following table shows the condensed financial results of the mortgage operations for the three months ended March 31, 2014 and 2013. See Note 7 to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
|
|
Three months ended March 31
(in thousands of dollars)
|
|
|
|
2014
|
|
|
2013
|
|
|
% Increase (Decrease)
|
|
Revenues from external customers
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from loan originations
|
|
$ |
20,044 |
|
|
$ |
27,103 |
|
|
|
(26 |
%) |
Secondary gains from investors
|
|
|
3,496 |
|
|
|
7,525 |
|
|
|
(54 |
%) |
Total
|
|
$ |
23,540 |
|
|
$ |
34,628 |
|
|
|
(32 |
%) |
Earnings before income taxes
|
|
$ |
(1,348 |
) |
|
$ |
2,337 |
|
|
|
(158 |
%) |
The decrease in earnings for the three months ended March 31, 2014 was due to lower secondary gains on mortgage loans sold to investors and the decline in refinance activity as a result of the increase in mortgage loan interest rates.
Mortgage Loan Loss Settlements
Future loan losses are extremely difficult to estimate, especially in the current market. However, management believes that the Company’s reserve methodology allow it to estimate its losses on loans sold. The amounts accrued for loan losses three months ended March 31, 2014 and 2013 were $372,000 and $537,000, respectively. The estimated liability for indemnification losses is included in other liabilities and accrued expenses and, as of March 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013, the balances were $5,527,000 and $5,507,000, respectively.
Settlement with Wells Fargo
On April 7, 2011, SecurityNational Mortgage entered into a settlement agreement with Wells Fargo Funding, Inc. (“Wells Fargo Funding”). The settlement agreement provides that it is intended to be a pragmatic commercial accommodation between SecurityNational Mortgage and Wells Fargo Funding and is not to be construed as an admission of responsibility, liability or fault for either party’s claims. Under the terms of the settlement agreement, SecurityNational Mortgage paid an initial settlement amount to Wells Fargo Funding in the amount of $4,300,000.
SecurityNational Mortgage is also required under the settlement agreement to set aside 10 basis points (.0010) during the period from April 8, 2011 to March 31, 2017 from the purchase proceeds of any loans that it sells to any mortgage loan purchaser, including Wells Fargo Funding, and pay such amounts to Wells Fargo Funding. SecurityNational Mortgage is additionally required under the settlement agreement to set aside 50% from the net proceeds that it receives from any sale, liquidation or other transfer of certain real estate properties that it owns, after subtracting taxes, commissions, recording fees and other transaction costs. These real estate properties consist of 27 real estate properties with a total book value as of March 31, 2014 of $4,675,000.
In consideration for SecurityNational Mortgage making the initial settlement payment to Wells Fargo Funding, Wells Fargo Funding and related parties, including Wells Fargo Bank, released SecurityNational Mortgage and related parties, including the Company and Security National Life, from any claims, demands, damages, obligations, liabilities, or causes of action relating to residential mortgage loans that Wells Fargo Funding purchased from SecurityNational Mortgage prior to December 31, 2009. Similarly, SecurityNational Mortgage released Wells Fargo Funding and its related parties from any claims, demands, damages, obligations, liabilities, or causes of actions relating to residential mortgage loans that Wells Fargo Funding purchased from SecurityNational Mortgage prior to December 31, 2009.
Mortgage Loan Loss Demands
Third Party Investors
There have been assertions in third party investor correspondence that SecurityNational Mortgage sold mortgage loans that allegedly contained borrower misrepresentations or experienced early payment defaults, or that were otherwise allegedly defective or not in compliance with agreements between SecurityNational Mortgage and the third party investors consisting principally of financial institutions. As a result of these claims, third party investors have made demands that SecurityNational Mortgage repurchase certain alleged defective mortgage loans that were sold to such investors or indemnify them against any losses related to such loans.
The total amount of potential claims by third party investors is difficult to determine. The Company has reserved and accrued $5,522,000 as of March 31, 2014 to settle all such investor related claims. The Company believes that the reserve for mortgage loan loss, which includes provisions for probable losses and indemnification on mortgage loans sold to investors, is reasonable based on available information. Moreover, the Company has successfully negotiated acceptable settlement terms with other third party investors that asserted claims for mortgage loan losses against SecurityNational Mortgage.
SecurityNational Mortgage disagrees with the repurchase demands and notices of potential claims from third party investors and believes it has significant defenses to these demands. If SecurityNational Mortgage is unable to resolve the alleged claims by the third party investors on acceptable terms, legal action may ensue. In the event of legal action, if SecurityNational Mortgage is not successful in its defenses against claims asserted by these third party investors to the extent that a substantial judgment is entered against SecurityNational Mortgage which is beyond its capacity to pay, SecurityNational Mortgage could be required to curtail or cease operations.
JP Morgan Chase Indemnification Demand
The Company and its wholly owned subsidiary, SecurityNational Mortgage, received a notice of claim for indemnification dated December 21, 2011, from JP Morgan Chase & Co. (“JP Morgan Chase”) on behalf of EMC Mortgage, LLC (“EMC Mortgage”), relating to 21 mortgage loans that EMC Mortgage allegedly purchased as a third party investor from SecurityNational Mortgage. The notice also referenced a guaranty agreement, dated February 23, 2006, by the Company for the benefit of EMC Mortgage. The indemnification notice additionally stated that EMC Mortgage had been named in a lawsuit by the Bear Stearns Mortgage Funding Trust 2007-AR2 (the “Trust”), which was filed on September 13, 2011 in the Delaware Court of Chancery.
The lawsuit the Trust brought against EMC Mortgage contends that more than 800 residential mortgage loans that EMC Mortgage sold to the Trust (including the 21 loans allegedly originated by SecurityNational Mortgage) contained breaches of representations and warranties with respect to the mortgage loans, as well as defaults and foreclosures in many of such loans. As a result of the alleged breaches of representations and warranties by EMC Mortgage, the complaint requests that EMC Mortgage be ordered to repurchase from the Trust any loans for which it breached its representations and warranties, in the amount of the mortgage loans’ outstanding principal balance and all accrued but unpaid interest.
The indemnification notice from JP Morgan Chase further alleged that the Company and SecurityNational Mortgage are required to indemnify EMC Mortgage for any of its losses arising from the lawsuit that the Trust brought against EMC based upon allegedly untrue statements of material fact related to information that was provided by SecurityNational Mortgage. To the extent the claims in the complaint relate to the 21 mortgage loans that SecurityNational Mortgage allegedly sold to EMC Mortgage, the Company believes it has significant defenses to such claims. The Company intends to vigorously defend itself and SecurityNational Mortgage in the event that JP Morgan Chase were to bring any legal action to require the Company or SecurityNational Mortgage to indemnify it for any loss, liability or expense in connection with the lawsuit that the Trust has brought against EMC Mortgage.
Mortgage Loan Loss Litigation
Lehman Brothers - Aurora Loan Services Litigation
On April 15, 2005, SecurityNational Mortgage entered into a loan purchase agreement with Lehman Brothers Bank, FSB (“Lehman Bank”). Under the terms of the loan purchase agreement, Lehman Bank agreed to purchase mortgage loans from time to time from SecurityNational Mortgage. During 2007, Lehman Bank and its wholly owned subsidiary, Aurora Loan Services LLC (“Aurora Loan Services”), purchased a total of 1,490 mortgage loans in the aggregate amount of $352,774,000 from SecurityNational Mortgage. Lehman Bank asserted that certain of the mortgage loans that it purchased from SecurityNational Mortgage during 2007 contained alleged misrepresentations and early payment defaults. As a result of these alleged issues with the mortgage loans, Lehman Bank contended it had the right to require SecurityNational Mortgage to repurchase certain loans or be liable for losses related to such loans under the loan purchase agreement. SecurityNational Mortgage disagrees with these claims.
On December 17, 2007, SecurityNational Mortgage entered into an Indemnification Agreement with Lehman Bank and Aurora Loan Services. Under the terms of the Indemnification Agreement, SecurityNational Mortgage agreed to indemnify Lehman Bank and Aurora Loan Services for 75% of all losses that Lehman Bank and Aurora Loan Services may incur relative to breaches by mortgagors pertaining to 55 mortgage loans that were purchased from SecurityNational Mortgage. SecurityNational Mortgage was released from any obligation to pay the remaining 25% of such losses. The Indemnification Agreement also required SecurityNational Mortgage to indemnify Lehman Bank and Aurora Loan Services for 100% of any future losses incurred on mortgage loans with breaches that were not among the 55 mortgage loans.
Pursuant to the Indemnification Agreement, SecurityNational Mortgage paid $395,000 to Aurora Loan Services as a deposit into a reserve account, to secure any obligations of SecurityNational Mortgage under the Indemnification Agreement. This deposit was in addition to a $250,000 deposit that SecurityNational Mortgage previously made into the reserve account for a total of $645,000. Losses from mortgage loans with alleged breaches were payable from the reserve account. However, Lehman Bank and Aurora Loan Services were not to apply any funds from the reserve account to a particular mortgage loan until an actual loss had occurred. Under the Indemnification Agreement SecurityNational Mortgage was to pay to Aurora Loan Services each calendar month the difference between the reserve account balance and $645,000, but in no event would SecurityNational Mortgage be required to make payments into the reserve account in excess of $125,000 for any calendar month.
Since the reserve account was established, SecurityNational Mortgage paid a total of $4,281,000 from the reserve account to indemnify Lehman Brothers Bank and Aurora Loan Services for alleged losses from 31 mortgage loans that were among 55 mortgage loans with alleged breaches that were covered by the Indemnification Agreement and ten other mortgage loans with alleged breaches. In the last monthly billing statement dated April 24, 2011 to SecurityNational Mortgage, Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc. (“Lehman Holdings”) claimed that SecurityNational Mortgage owed approximately $3,745,000 for mortgage loan losses under the Indemnification Agreement.
During 2010 and 2011, the Company recognized alleged losses of $1,289,000 and $-0-, respectively. However, management cannot fully determine the total losses because there may be potential claims for losses that have not yet been determined. As of March 31, 2014, the Company had not accrued for any losses under the Indemnification Agreement. SecurityNational Mortgage was involved in discussions with Lehman Bank and Lehman Holdings concerning issues under the Indemnification Agreement. During the discussion period, monthly payments for December 2010 and January, February, March and April of 2011 totaling $625,000 were abated or deferred.
On May 11, 2011, SecurityNational Mortgage filed a complaint against Aurora Bank FSB, formerly known as Lehman Bank, and Aurora Loan Services in the United States District Court for the District of Utah because it had been unable to resolve certain issues under the Indemnification Agreement. The complaint alleges, among other things, material breach of the Indemnification Agreement, including a claim that neither Lehman Bank nor Aurora Loan Services owned mortgage loans sold by SecurityNational to justify the amount of payments demanded from, and made by SecurityNational Mortgage. As a result, SecurityNational Mortgage claims it is entitled to judgment of approximately $4,000,000 against Lehman Bank, as well as Aurora Loan Services to the extent of its involvement and complicity with Lehman Bank. The complaint also alleges a second claim for material breach of a section of the Indemnification Agreement that contains an alleged “sunset” provision and that the amount of the requested payments made was not justified under the “sunset” provision.
On June 8, 2011, Lehman Holdings, which had filed for bankruptcy in September 2008, filed a complaint against SecurityNational Mortgage in the United States District Court for the District of Utah. A Lehman Holdings’ subsidiary owns Lehman Bank. The complaint alleges that SecurityNational Mortgage sold loans to Lehman Bank, which were then sold to Lehman Holdings. The complaint additionally alleges that Lehman Bank and Aurora Loan Services assigned their rights and remedies under the loan purchase agreement, as well as the Indemnification Agreement to Lehman Holdings, which latter assignment purportedly took place on March 28, 2011. Lehman Holdings declared in a letter dated June 2, 2011 that the Indemnification Agreement was null and void except for losses previously released and discharged, which is disputed by SecurityNational Mortgage.
Lehman Holdings’ alleged claims are for damages for breach of contract and breach of warranty pursuant to a loan purchase agreement and Seller’s Guide. Based on claiming that the Indemnification Agreement is null and void pursuant to its lawsuit, Lehman Holdings has initially claimed damages in excess of $5,000,000. Prior to declaring the Indemnification Agreement null and void, Lehman Holdings claimed in a then recent billing statement under the terms of the Indemnification Agreement, that SecurityNational Mortgage owed approximately $3,745,000 for mortgage loan losses under the Indemnification Agreement. SecurityNational Mortgage strongly disagrees with the position of Lehman Holdings and, as set forth in its May 11, 2011 complaint, seeks affirmative relief of approximately $4,000,000 from Lehman Bank and Aurora Loan Services, which are related to Lehman Holdings.
On September 4, 2012, SecurityNational Mortgage filed a motion for summary judgment in its action against Lehman Bank and Aurora Loan Services on certain material issues, as well as against Lehman Holdings regarding its claims against SecurityNational Mortgage. Lehman Bank and Aurora Loan Services filed a cross motion for summary judgment as to the issues in SecurityNational Mortgage’s motion and, in the Lehman Holdings case, Lehman Holdings has requested that the Court allow a cross motion on the issues which are the subject of SecurityNational Mortgage’s September 4, 2012 motion. The cases are before two different federal judges.
On February 27, 2013, SecurityNational Mortgage’s motion for summary judgment against Lehman Bank and Aurora Loan Services and the related cross motion were heard by Judge David Nuffer of the United States District Court for the District of Utah. After an extensive hearing, Judge Nuffer requested that the parties prepare findings of fact in accordance with the Court’s earlier promulgated findings as modified at the hearing, and that each party submit proposed conclusions of law related to the motions. Judge Nuffer also said that he may request a further hearing on the matter. The motion and cross motion were taken under advisement. SecurityNational Mortgage’s motion in the Lehman Holdings case was heard on April 22, 2014 before Judge Ted Stewart of the United States District Court for the District of Utah, and is under advisement. A trial, as may be necessary, is set for August 11, 2014.
On May 6, 2014, Judge Nuffer issued his “Summary of Facts, Conclusions of Law and Order Granting SecurityNational’s Motion for Summary Judgment,” in which he granted SecurityNational Mortgage’s motion for summary judgment and denied the cross motion of Aurora Bank (formerly known as Lehman Brothers Bank) and Aurora Loan Services. A hearing is set for June 2, 2014 to determine the amount that is owing to SecurityNational Mortgage. On May 7, 2014, Judge Stewart issued an order for supplemental briefing on how Judge Nuffer’s order may affect SecurityNational Mortgage’s motion for summary judgment in the Lehman Holdings case.
Consolidation
Three Months Ended March 31, 2014 Compared to Three Months Ended March 31, 2013
Total revenues decreased by $9,799,000, or 17.9%, to $45,053,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2014, from $54,852,000 for the comparable period in 2013. Contributing to this decrease in total revenues was a $10,725,000 decrease in mortgage fee income, a $644,000 decrease in realized gains on investments and other assets, and a $46,000 decrease in net mortuary and cemetery sales. This decrease in total revenues was offset by a $708,000 increase in insurance premiums and other considerations, a $641,000 increase in net investment income, and a $267,000 increase in other revenues.
Insurance premiums and other considerations increased by $708,000, or 5.7%, to $13,129,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2014, from $12,421,000 for the comparable period in 2013. This increase was primarily due to an increase in first year premiums as a result of increased insurance sales in 2014.
Net investment income increased by $641,000, or 12.8%, to $5,642,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2014, from $5,001,000 for the comparable period in 2013. This increase was primarily attributable to a $612,000 increase in rental income from real estate owned, a $512,000 increase in mortgage loan interest, and a $156,000 increase in fixed maturity securities income. This decrease was offset by a $308,000 decrease in short-term investment income, a $299,000 increase in investment expenses, a $26,000 decrease in equity securities income, and a $6,000 decrease in policy loan income.
Net cemetery and mortuary sales decreased by $46,000, or 1.6%, to $2,831,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2014, from $2,877,000 for the comparable period in 2013. This decrease was primarily due to a decrease in at-need sales in both the cemetery and mortuary operations.
Realized gains on investments and other assets decreased by $644,000, or 76.4%, to $199,000 in realized gains for the three months ended March 31, 2014, from $843,000 in realized gains for the comparable period in 2013. This decrease in realized gains on investments and other assets was the result of a $556,000 decrease in realized gains on other assets, an $80,000 decrease in realized gains on securities available for sale, and an $8,000 decrease in realized gains on fixed maturity securities.
Mortgage fee income decreased by $10,725,000, or 32.2%, to $22,538,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2014, from $33,263,000 for the comparable period in 2013. This decrease was primarily attributable to lower secondary gains from mortgage loans sold to investors and the decline in refinance activity as a result of the increase in mortgage loan rates during the first quarter of 2014.
Other revenues increased by $267,000, or 56.0%, to $744,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2014, from $477,000 for the comparable period in 2013. This increase was due to an increase in mortgage servicing fees.
Total benefits and expenses were $44,887,000, or 99.7% of total revenues, for the three months ended March 31, 2014, as compared to $51,625,000, or 94.1% of total revenues, for the comparable period in 2013.
Death benefits, surrenders and other policy benefits, and future policy benefits decreased by an aggregate of $500,000 or 4.1%, to $11,559,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2014, from $12,059,000 for the comparable period in 2013. This decrease was primarily the result of a $235,000 decrease in surrender and other policy benefits, a $184,000 decrease in future policy benefits, and an $81,000 decrease in death benefits.
Amortization of deferred policy and pre-need acquisition costs and value of business acquired decreased by $90,000, or 6.0%, to $1,404,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2014, from $1,494,000 for the comparable period in 2013. This decrease was primarily due to improved persistency in the premium paying traditional life business during the period.
Selling, general and administrative expenses decreased by $5,828,000, or 15.9%, to $30,937,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2014, from $36,765,000 for the comparable period in 2013. This decrease was primarily the result of a decrease in mortgage loan originations by SecurityNational Mortgage, which was attributed to the decline in refinance activity as a result of the increase in mortgage loan rates. Commissions decreased by $7,009,000, costs related to funding mortgage loans decreased by $310,000, and provision for loan losses decreased by $180,000. This decrease was offset by increases in salaries by $738,000 due to an increase in the number of employees, and in other expenses by $933,000.
Interest expense decreased by $309,000, or 38.3%, to $498,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2014, from $807,000 for the comparable period in 2013. This decrease was primarily due to reduction in outstanding balances on warehouse lines of credit used to fund mortgage loans.
Cost of goods and services sold of the cemeteries and mortuaries decreased by $9,000, or 1.9%, to $490,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2014, from $499,000 for the comparable period in 2013. This decrease was primarily due to a decrease in cemetery and mortuary sales.
Comprehensive income for the three months ended March 31, 2014 and 2013 amounted to gains of $455,000 and $1,658,000, respectively. This $1,203,000 decrease in comprehensive income in 2014 was primarily the result of a $1,895,000 decrease in net income, a $165,000 decrease in unrealized gains in securities available for sale, which were offset by an $857,000 increase in derivatives related to mortgage loans.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
The Company’s life insurance subsidiaries and cemetery and mortuary subsidiaries realize cash flow from premiums, contract payments and sales on personal services rendered for cemetery and mortuary business, from interest and dividends on invested assets, and from the proceeds from the maturity of held to maturity investments or sale of other investments. The mortgage subsidiaries realize cash flow from fees generated by originating and refinancing mortgage loans and interest earned on mortgages sold to investors. The Company considers these sources of cash flow to be adequate to fund future policyholder and cemetery and mortuary liabilities, which generally are long-term, and adequate to pay current policyholder claims, annuity payments, expenses on the issuance of new policies, the maintenance of existing policies, debt service, and to meet current operating expenses.
During the three months ended March 31, 2014, the Company's operations provided cash of $22,717,000. This was due primarily to an $18,142,000 decrease in the balance of mortgage loans sold to investors and a $5,651,000 increase in future policy benefits during the first quarter of 2014. During the three months ended March 31, 2013, the Company’s operations provided cash of $5,449,000. This was due primarily to a $2,159,000 decrease in the balance of mortgage loans sold to investors and a $4,476,000 increase in future policy benefits during the first quarter of 2013.
The Company’s liability for future life, annuity and other benefits is expected to be paid out over the long-term due to the Company’s market niche of selling funeral plans. Funeral plans are small face value life insurance that will pay the costs and expenses incurred at the time of a person’s death. A person generally will keep these policies in force and will not surrender them prior to a person’s death. Because of the long-term nature of these liabilities, the Company is able to hold to maturity its bonds, real estate and mortgage loans, thus reducing the risk of liquidating these long-term investments as a result of any sudden changes in fair values.
The Company attempts to match the duration of invested assets with its policyholder and cemetery and mortuary liabilities. The Company may sell investments other than those held to maturity in the portfolio to help in this timing. The Company purchases short-term investments on a temporary basis to meet the expectations of short-term requirements of the Company’s products. The Company’s investment philosophy is intended to provide a rate of return that will persist during the expected duration of policyholder and cemetery and mortuary liabilities regardless of future interest rate movements.
The Company’s investment policy is to invest predominantly in fixed maturity securities, mortgage loans, and the warehousing of mortgage loans on a short-term basis before selling the loans to investors in accordance with the requirements and laws governing the life insurance subsidiaries. Bonds owned by the insurance subsidiaries amounted to $141,279,000 as of March 31, 2014 compared to $142,854,000 as of December 31, 2013. This represents 35.0% and 37.3% of the total investments as of March 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013, respectively. Generally, all bonds owned by the life insurance subsidiaries are rated by the National Association of Insurance Commissioners (NAIC). Under this rating system, there are six categories used for rating bonds. At March 31, 2014, 4.84% (or $6,841,000) and at December 31, 2013, 4.6% (or $6,621,000) of the Company’s total bond investments were invested in bonds in rating categories three through six, which were considered non-investment grade.
The Company has classified its fixed income securities as held to maturity. Business conditions, however, may develop in the future that may indicate a need for a higher level of liquidity in the investment portfolio. In that event the Company believes it could sell short-term investment grade securities before liquidating higher yielding longer-term securities.
The Company is subject to risk based capital guidelines established by statutory regulators requiring minimum capital levels based on the perceived risk of assets, liabilities, disintermediation, and business risk. At March 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013, the life insurance subsidiary was in compliance with the regulatory criteria.
The Company’s total capitalization of stockholders’ equity, bank debt and notes payable was $106,227,000 as of March 31, 2014, as compared to $106,040,000 as of December 31, 2013. Stockholders’ equity as a percent of total capitalization was 83.3% and 82.8% as of March 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013, respectively.
Lapse rates measure the amount of insurance terminated during a particular period. The Company’s lapse rate for life insurance in 2013 was 5.7% as compared to a rate of 6.0% for 2012. The 2014 lapse rate to date has been approximately the same as 2013.
At March 31, 2014, $32,900,000 of the Company’s consolidated stockholders’ equity represented the statutory stockholders’ equity of the Company’s life insurance subsidiaries. The life insurance subsidiaries cannot pay a dividend to the Company, its parent company, without approval of state insurance regulatory authorities.
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.
There have been no significant changes since the Annual Report on Form 10-K filed for the year ended December 31, 2013.
Item 4. Controls and Procedures.
Disclosure Controls and Procedures
As of March 31, 2014, the Company carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of its Chief Executive Officer (CEO) and Chief Financial Officer (CFO), of the effectiveness of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”)). The Company’s disclosure controls and procedures are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) reports the Company files or submits under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time period specified by the SEC’s rules and forms and that such information is accumulated and communicated to management, including the Company’s CEO and CFO, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. The officers have concluded that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of March 31, 2014, and that the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements included in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly present, in all material respects, the Company’s financial condition, results of operations and cash flows for the periods presented in conformity with United States Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP).
Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting
There have been no changes in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting during the most recently completed fiscal quarter that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.
Part II - Other Information
Item 1. Legal Proceedings.
Lehman Brothers - Aurora Loan Services Litigation
On April 15, 2005, SecurityNational Mortgage entered into a loan purchase agreement with Lehman Brothers Bank, FSB (“Lehman Bank”). Under the terms of the loan purchase agreement, Lehman Bank agreed to purchase mortgage loans from time to time from SecurityNational Mortgage. During 2007, Lehman Bank and its wholly owned subsidiary, Aurora Loan Services LLC (“Aurora Loan Services”), purchased a total of 1,490 mortgage loans in the aggregate amount of $352,774,000 from SecurityNational Mortgage. Lehman Bank asserted that certain of the mortgage loans that it purchased from SecurityNational Mortgage during 2007 contained alleged misrepresentations and early payment defaults. As a result of these alleged issues with the mortgage loans, Lehman Bank contended it had the right to require SecurityNational Mortgage to repurchase certain loans or be liable for losses related to such loans under the loan purchase agreement. SecurityNational Mortgage disagrees with these claims.
On December 17, 2007, SecurityNational Mortgage entered into an Indemnification Agreement with Lehman Bank and Aurora Loan Services. Under the terms of the Indemnification Agreement, SecurityNational Mortgage agreed to indemnify Lehman Bank and Aurora Loan Services for 75% of all losses that Lehman Bank and Aurora Loan Services may incur relative to breaches by mortgagors pertaining to 55 mortgage loans that were purchased from SecurityNational Mortgage. SecurityNational Mortgage was released from any obligation to pay the remaining 25% of such losses. The Indemnification Agreement also required SecurityNational Mortgage to indemnify Lehman Bank and Aurora Loan Services for 100% of any future losses incurred on mortgage loans with breaches that were not among the 55 mortgage loans.
Pursuant to the Indemnification Agreement, SecurityNational Mortgage paid $395,000 to Aurora Loan Services as a deposit into a reserve account, to secure any obligations of SecurityNational Mortgage under the Indemnification Agreement. This deposit was in addition to a $250,000 deposit that SecurityNational Mortgage previously made into the reserve account for a total of $645,000. Losses from mortgage loans with alleged breaches were payable from the reserve account. However, Lehman Bank and Aurora Loan Services were not to apply any funds from the reserve account to a particular mortgage loan until an actual loss had occurred. Under the Indemnification Agreement SecurityNational Mortgage was to pay to Aurora Loan Services each calendar month the difference between the reserve account balance and $645,000, but in no event would SecurityNational Mortgage be required to make payments into the reserve account in excess of $125,000 for any calendar month.
Since the time the reserve account was established, SecurityNational Mortgage paid a total of $4,281,000 from the reserve account to indemnify Lehman Brothers Bank and Aurora Loan Services for alleged losses from 31 mortgage loans that were among 55 mortgage loans with alleged breaches that were covered by the Indemnification Agreement and ten other mortgage loans with alleged breaches. In the last monthly billing statement dated April 24, 2011 to SecurityNational Mortgage, Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc. (“Lehman Holdings”) claimed that SecurityNational Mortgage owed approximately $3,745,000 for mortgage loan losses under the Indemnification Agreement.
During 2010 and 2011, the Company recognized alleged losses of $1,289,000 and $-0-, respectively. However, management cannot fully determine the total losses because there could be potential claims for losses that have not yet been determined. As of December 31, 2013, the Company had not accrued for any losses under the Indemnification Agreement. SecurityNational Mortgage was involved in discussions with Lehman Bank and Lehman Holdings concerning issues under the Indemnification Agreement. During the discussion period, monthly payments for December 2010 and January, February, March and April of 2011 totaling $625,000 were abated or deferred.
On May 11, 2011, SecurityNational Mortgage filed a complaint against Aurora Bank FSB, formerly known as Lehman Bank, and Aurora Loan Services in the United States District Court for the District of Utah because it had been unable to resolve certain issues under the Indemnification Agreement. The complaint alleges, among other things, material breach of the Indemnification Agreement, including a claim that neither Lehman Bank nor Aurora Loan Services owned mortgage loans sold by SecurityNational to justify the amount of payments demanded from, and made by SecurityNational Mortgage. As a result, SecurityNational Mortgage claims it is entitled to judgment of approximately $4,000,000 against Lehman Bank, as well as Aurora Loan Services to the extent of its involvement and complicity with Lehman Bank. The complaint also alleges a second claim for material breach of a section of the Indemnification Agreement that contains an alleged “sunset” provision and that the amount of the requested payments made was not justified under the “sunset” provision.
On June 8, 2011, Lehman Holdings, which had filed for bankruptcy in September 2008, filed a complaint against SecurityNational Mortgage in the United States District Court for the District of Utah. A Lehman Holdings’ subsidiary owns Lehman Bank. The complaint alleges that SecurityNational Mortgage sold loans to Lehman Bank, which were then sold to Lehman Holdings. The complaint additionally alleges that Lehman Bank and Aurora Loan Services assigned their rights and remedies under the loan purchase agreement, as well as the Indemnification Agreement to Lehman Holdings, which latter assignment purportedly took place on March 28, 2011. Lehman Holdings declared in a letter dated June 2, 2011 that the Indemnification Agreement was null and void except for losses previously released and discharged, which is disputed by SecurityNational Mortgage.
Lehman Holdings’ alleged claims are for damages for breach of contract and breach of warranty pursuant to a loan purchase agreement and Seller’s Guide. Based on claiming that the Indemnification Agreement is null and void pursuant to its lawsuit, Lehman Holdings has initially claimed damages in excess of $5,000,000. Prior to declaring the Indemnification Agreement null and void, Lehman Holdings claimed in a then recent billing statement under the terms of the Indemnification Agreement, that SecurityNational Mortgage owed approximately $3,745,000 for mortgage loan losses under the Indemnification Agreement. SecurityNational Mortgage strongly disagrees with the position of Lehman Holdings and, as set forth in its May 11, 2011 complaint, seeks affirmative relief of approximately $4,000,000 from Lehman Bank and Aurora Loan Services, which are related to Lehman Holdings.
On September 4, 2012, SecurityNational Mortgage filed a motion for summary judgment in its action against Lehman Bank and Aurora Loan Services on certain material issues, as well as against Lehman Holdings regarding its claims against SecurityNational Mortgage. Lehman Bank and Aurora Loan Services filed a cross motion for summary judgment as to the issues in SecurityNational Mortgage’s motion and, in the Lehman Holdings case, Lehman Holdings has requested that the Court allow a cross motion on the issues which are the subject of SecurityNational Mortgage’s September 4, 2012 motion. The cases are before two different federal judges.
On February 27, 2013, SecurityNational Mortgage’s motion for summary judgment against Lehman Bank and Aurora Loan Services and the related cross motion were heard by Judge David Nuffer of the United States District Court for the District of Utah. After an extensive hearing, Judge Nuffer requested that the parties prepare findings of fact in accordance with the Court’s earlier promulgated findings as modified at the hearing, and that each party submit proposed conclusions of law related to the motions. Judge Nuffer also said that he may request a further hearing on the matter. The motion and cross motion were taken under advisement. SecurityNational Mortgage’s motion in the Lehman Holdings case was heard on April 22, 2014 before Judge Ted Stewart of the United States District Court for the District of Utah, and is under advisement. A trial, as may be necessary, is set for August 11, 2014.
On May 6, 2014, Judge Nuffer issued his “Summary of Facts, Conclusions of Law and Order Granting SecurityNational’s Motion for Summary Judgment,” in which he granted SecurityNational Mortgage’s motion for summary judgment and denied the cross motion of Aurora Bank (formerly known as Lehman Brothers Bank) and Aurora Loan Services. A hearing is set for June 2, 2014 to determine the amount that is owing to SecurityNational Mortgage. On May 7, 2014, Judge Stewart issued an order for supplemental briefing on how Judge Nuffer’s order may affect SecurityNational Mortgage’s motion for summary judgment in the Lehman Holdings case.
The Company is not a party to any other material legal proceedings outside the ordinary course of business or to any other legal proceedings, which if adversely determined, would have a material adverse effect on its financial condition or results of operation.
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds.
None
Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities.
None
Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures.
None
Item 5. Other Information.
On December 6, 2013, the Company’s Board of Directors approved amendments to the Company’s Bylaws. The new amendments to the Bylaws were effective as of December 6, 2013. The most important changes in the Bylaws were as follows: First, a new Article 13 was added entitled, “Forum for Adjudication of Disputes.” This new article was added in view of the favorable decision by the Delaware Court of Chancery in upholding the enforceability of the forum selection bylaws in the Chevron/FedEx case. The plaintiffs in that case appealed the decision, but voluntarily dismissed their appeal.
More specifically, the new Article 13 provides that unless the Company consents in writing to the selection of an alternative forum, the sole and exclusive forum for (i) any derivative action or proceeding brought on behalf of the Company, (ii) any action asserting a claim of breach of a fiduciary duty owed by a director, officer or other employee of the Company to the Company or the Company’s stockholders, (iii) any action asserting a claim pursuant to any provision of the Utah Revised Business Corporation Act, or (iv) an action asserting a claim governed by the internal affairs doctrine, will be a state or federal court located within the State of Utah.
The Company believes the forum selection provision in the Company’s Bylaws can greatly reduce the costs and complexities associated with certain types of multi-jurisdiction litigation. Moreover, it will provide greater certainty in outcomes in such litigation to the benefit of all the Company’s stockholders.
Second, the amendments to the Company’s Bylaws amended the indemnification provisions in Article 8 to include the indemnification of the Company’s officers rather than indemnifying just the Company’s directors as was the case before the amendments. Third, Section 3.15 of the Bylaws was amended to allow the participation by the Company’s directors in Board of Directors meetings by means of other forms of communication (e.g., Skype) besides conference calls. As amended, Section 3.15 allows directors to participate in a Board meeting by means of a conference telephone call or similar communications equipment, or through the use of any other means of communication, by which all persons participating in the meeting can hear each other during the meeting.
Item 6. Exhibits, Financial Statements Schedules and Reports on Form 8-K.
(a)(1) Financial Statements
See “Table of Contents – Part I – Financial Information” under page 2 above
(a)(2) Financial Statement Schedules
None
All other schedules to the consolidated financial statements required by Article 7 of Regulation S-X are not required under the related instructions or are inapplicable and therefore have been omitted.
(a)(3) Exhibits
The following Exhibits are filed herewith pursuant to Rule 601 of Regulation S-K or are incorporated by reference to previous filings.
3.1
|
Articles of Restatement of Articles of Incorporation (3)
|
|
|
3.2
|
Amended Bylaws (5)
|
|
|
4.1
|
Specimen Class A Stock Certificate (1)
|
|
|
4.2
|
Specimen Class C Stock Certificate (1)
|
|
|
4.3
|
Specimen Preferred Stock Certificate and Certificate of Designation of Preferred Stock (1)
|
|
|
10.1
|
Restated and Amended Employee Stock Ownership Plan and Trust Agreement (1)
|
|
|
10.2
|
2003 Stock Option Plan (4)
|
|
|
10.3
|
2006 Director Stock Option Plan (8)
|
|
|
10.4
|
2013 Stock Option Plan (12)
|
|
|
10.5
|
Deferred Compensation Plan (2)
|
|
|
10.6
|
Employment agreement with J. Lynn Beckstead, Jr. (6)
|
|
|
10.7
|
Employment agreement with Scott M. Quist (7)
|
|
|
10.8
|
Indemnification Agreement among SecurityNational Mortgage Company, Lehman Brothers Bank, and Aurora Loan Services (9)
|
|
|
10.9
|
Coinsurance Agreement between Security National Life Insurance Company and Mothe Life Insurance Company (10)
|
|
|
10.10
|
Certificate and Agreement of Contribution to Surplus between Security National Financial Corporation and Security National Life Insurance Company (10)
|
|
|
10.11
|
Agreement and Plan of Reorganization among Security National Financial Corporation and certain subsidiaries (11)
|
21
|
Subsidiaries of the Registrant
|
|
|
31.1
|
Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as enacted by Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
|
|
|
31.2
|
Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as enacted by Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
|
|
|
32.1
|
Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
|
|
|
32.2
|
Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
|
|
|
101 INS
|
XBRL Instance Document*
|
|
|
101 SCH
|
XBRL Schema Document*
|
|
|
101 CAL
|
XBRL Calculation Linkbase Document*
|
|
|
101 DEF
|
XBRL Definition Linkbase Document*
|
|
|
101 LAB
|
XBRL Labels Linkbase Document*
|
|
|
101 PRE
|
XBRL Presentation Linkbase Document*
|
* The XBRL related information in Exhibit 101 shall not be deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or otherwise subject to liability of that section and shall not be incorporated by reference into any filing or other document pursuant to the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, except as shall be expressly set forth by specific reference in such filing or document.
(1) Incorporated by reference from Registration Statement on Form S-1, as filed on September 29, 1987
|
|
(2) Incorporated by reference from Annual Report on Form 10-K, as filed on April 3, 2002
|
|
(3) Incorporated by reference from Report on Form 8-K/A, as filed on January 8, 2003
|
|
(4) Incorporated by reference from Schedule 14A Definitive Proxy Statement, as filed on September 5, 2003, relating to the Company’s Annual Meeting of Stockholders
|
|
(5) Incorporated by reference from Report on Form 10-Q, as filed on November 14, 2003
|
|
(6) Incorporated by reference from Report on Form 10-K, as filed on March 30, 2004
|
|
(7) Incorporated by reference from Report on Form 10-Q, as filed on August 13, 2004
|
|
(8) Incorporated by reference from Schedule 14A Definitive Proxy Statement, as filed on June 1, 2007, relating to the Company’s Annual Meeting of Stockholders
|
|
(9) Incorporated by reference from Report on Form 10-K, as filed on March 31, 2009
|
|
(10) Incorporated by reference from Report on Form 8-K, as filed on December 27, 2012
|
|
(11) Incorporated by reference from Report on Form 10-Q, as filed on May 15, 2013
|
|
(12) Incorporated by reference from Schedule 14A Definitive Proxy Statement, as filed on June 5, 2013, relating to the Company’s Annual Meeting of Stockholders
|
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
REGISTRANT
SECURITY NATIONAL FINANCIAL CORPORATION
Registrant
Dated: May 15, 2014
|
|
/s/ Scott M. Quist
|
|
|
Scott M. Quist
|
|
|
Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer
|
|
|
(Principal Executive Officer)
|
Dated: May 15, 2014
|
|
/s/ Garrett S. Sill
|
|
|
Garrett S. Sill
|
|
|
Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
|
|
|
(Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer)
|
49