SCHEDULE 14A INFORMATION
                    PROXY STATEMENT PURSUANT TO SECTION 14(a)
                     OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

Filed by the Registrant [ ]
Filed by a Party other than the Registrant [X]
    Check the appropriate box:
     [ ]   Preliminary Proxy Statement
     [ ]   Confidential, for Use of the Commission only (as permitted by
           Rule 14a-6(e)(2))
     [ ]   Definitive Proxy Statement
     [X]   Definitive Additional Materials
     [ ]   Soliciting Material Under Rule 14a-12


                       LONE STAR STEAKHOUSE & SALOON, INC.
                (Name of Registrant as Specified in its Charter)

                                 GUY W. ADAMS

     (Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement if other than the Registrant)

Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):

[X]  No fee required.
[ ]  $125 per Exchange Act Rules 0-11(c)(1)(ii), 14a-6(i)(1), 14a-6(i)(2) or
     Item 22(a)(2) of Schedule 14A.
[ ]  Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and 0-11.
     1)     Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies:
     2)     Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies:
     3)     Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed
            pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (Set forth the amount on which
            the filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined):
     4)     Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction:
     5)     Total fee paid:
[ ]  Fee paid previously with preliminary materials.
[ ]  Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act
     Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was
     paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement
     number, or the Form or Schedule and the date of its filing.
     1)     Amount Previously Paid:
     2)     Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.:
     3)     Filing Party: Guy W. Adams
     4)     Date Filed: June 29, 2001


Lone Star's 2001 annual shareholder meeting will take place on July 6, 2001 at
the Sullivan's Steakhouse restaurant located at 300 Colorado Street, Austin,
Texas 78701, 9:00 a.m. local time.


Vote the GOLD Proxy for Guy Adams


Below is a partial summary of events related to Mr. Adams' proxy contest for
election to the Board of Lone Star Steakhouse:


June 28,   PROXY MONITOR ENDORSES THE CANDIDACY OF MR. ADAMS FOR ELECTION TO
LONE STAR'S BOARD OF DIRECTORS.  Proxy Monitor provides proxy research, voting
and auditing services to pension funds and their investment managers, serving
over 150 institutional clients, encompassing over 20,000 companies.  AS A
RESULT OF THIS ENDORSEMENT, BOTH OF THE MAJOR INDEPENDENT FIRMS REVIEWING THE
RESPECTIVE CANDIDACIES OF MR. ADAMS AND MR. COULTER HAVE NOW ENDORSED MR.
ADAMS.  Excerpts from the Proxy Monitor report states:

"When it came right down to it, notwithstanding any positive affects of
certain of management's decisions and strategies, we ultimately asked and
answered two questions:

1)    Has the board done its job well?
2)    Could Mr. Adam's membership on the board enhance shareholders' long-term
interests?

"To the first question, we answered no. Not in terms of its compensation
decisions, not in terms of its governance practices, and certainly not in
terms of fully appreciating its fiduciary role nor respecting the shareholder
franchise (including those "activist pension funds" with "unknown political
agendas"). Indeed, we believe that management's over-the-top response to Mr.
Adam's exercise of his ownership rights lends itself to support the
dissident's concerns about the board's commitment to an impartial and high-
quality decision-making process, not to mention its good judgment.

"To the second question, we answered yes. Mr. Adams is not seeking to gain
control of the board or to push an agenda that management describes as
different from other shareholders. Quite simply, Mr. Adams is seeking to
ameliorate shareholders' rights on a rather basic level - by respecting proper
governance practices and by restoring accountability. Furthermore, we are not
swayed by management's assertion that Mr. Adam's membership would "disrupt" or
"destroy the progress that Lone Star has achieved."


"Accordingly, we recommend that shareholders DISCARD the WHITE proxy card, and
vote FOR Mr. Adams using the GOLD proxy card."


June 28,  Adams files corrective statements with the SEC as required by the
Court.

June 26,   INSTITUTIONAL SHAREHOLDERS SERVICES (ISS) ENDORSES THE CANDIDACY OF
MR. ADAMS FOR THE ELECTION TO LONE STAR'S BOARD OF DIRECTORS.  ISS is the
world's leading provider of proxy voting and corporate governance services,
serving more than 700 clients world worldwide.  Excerpts from the ISS report
state:

"The critical issues for shareholders to consider are whether or not
management is accountable to shareholders, whether or not management has taken
the necessary steps to turn the company around, and whether or not Mr. Adams
can be an influential factor in improving the company's overall performance.
One cannot easily dismiss the fact that the company's operational performance
was poor over the last five years and the company underperformed its peers
over this period."

"Governance is an important issue in this contest and cannot be overlooked
simply because management is attempting to turn the company around."

ISS concludes their Proxy Analysis by stating, "On balance, ISS believes that
the board needs to be more accountable to shareholders and Mr. Adams may
provide the necessary influence to facilitate this matter.  ISS believes that
shareholders should support the dissident nominee, Mr. Adams."


June 25,   U.S. District Court of Kansas rules Guy Adams is NOT a party to any
secret group.  The Court REBUFFED the efforts of Lone Star to stop Mr. Adams'
proxy solicitation and to invalidate proxies voted to date in his favor.  The
Court also instructed Mr. Adams to file corrective statements with the SEC
regarding minor disclosure items in his April 9, 2001 Proposed Letter To
Shareholders.


June 24,  The New York Times publishes an article concerning this proxy
contest stating, "One might expect Lone Star management to make nice to its
shareholders. Instead, it is poking them in the eye with a cattle prod."
(See article online:  www.nytimes.com  search keyword "Lone Star").


June 18,   Guy Adams mails letter and proxy cards to Lone Star's shareholders.


June 15,  the Federal District Court of Kansas rebuffs Adams' motion for
dismissal for lack of jurisdiction by the Kansas courts.


June 5,  Lone Star takes deposition of Guy Adams in regards to discovery in
its lawsuit.


June 4,  Mr. Adams files amended Definitive Proxy and Letter to Shareholders.


May 31,  Lone Star responds to Adams' request for Shareholders list.  Lone
Star refuses to provide the Shareholder list and instead offers to mail his
material themselves as provided for in the SEC rules.  However, Lone Star
states Mr. Adams' cost of such mailing will be between $29,594 and $38,193,
depending upon weight.  This mailing cost comes to $3.61 and $4.66 per letter.
Mr. Adams' own cost for such mailings through ADP/ ICS were estimated to be
considerable less than that quoted by the Company.


May 24,  Lone Star takes deposition of Ted White with CalPERS in regards to
discovery in its lawsuit against Adams.


May 23,  Mr. Adams request a Shareholder List from Lone Star to mail his
materials to Shareholders.


May 18, Lone Star files their Definitive Proxy Statement.


May 11,  Mr. Adams files a motion for dismissal of Lone Star's lawsuit for
lack of jurisdiction with the Federal District court in Wichita, Kansas.


May 4,  Mr. Adams files an Amended Letter to Shareholders to address some of
the concerns expressed by Lone Star in its lawsuit.


May 1,  Lone Star Steakhouse files its Preliminary Proxy stating, among other
things:

        i)  The annual meeting will be held on July 6, 2001 in Austin, Texas

        ii)  There is a shareholder proposal to promptly auction off the
Company, "by any appropriate process the Board chooses to adopt including a
sale to the highest bidder whether in cash, stock, or a combination of both."


April 25,  Lone Star files an amended Form 10-K/A, which includes an
"Acknowledgement Letter" between the Company and certain employees, clarifying
portions of the financial terms in their Change of Control Agreements dated
January 3, 2001.


April 20,  Lone Star files a lawsuit against Mr. Adams in Federal District
Court in Wichita, Kansas.   The Complaint alleges that Mr. Adams and others
are conducting an unlawful proxy solicitation by, among other things, failing
to disclose unnamed "participants" who are providing financial support for Mr.
Adams' efforts, by making false and materially misleading statements regarding
the Company and its Change of Control Agreements, and by making false and
materially misleading statements regarding alleged "support" garnered by Mr.
Adams.


April 18,  Lone Star responds to Adams' two previous letters requesting their
comments, by stating, among other things, they were, "...in the process of
preparing a response to your SEC filings and the charges contained therein.
We intend to do so in a manner that is appropriate and complete."


April 17,  Lone Star's independent Directors meet with CalPERS in Sacramento,
CA and discuss, among other things, the Change of Control Agreements.  CalPERS
follows up the meeting with a letter to Lone Star's independent Directors
stating:

"The Change in Control Agreements in their entirety appear to be designed to
unjustly enrich management at the expense of shareholders."


April 13,  Mr. Adams mails a second letter to Lone Star seeking verification
of material in his Proposed Letter to Shareholders.


April 9,  Mr. Adams filed additional Definitive Proxy materials, which
included a Proposed Letter to Shareholders depicting his understanding of the
Change of Control Agreements and its financial consequences upon the Company.


April 6,  Mr. Adams mails Lone Star a copy of his Proposed Letter to
Shareholders, requesting the Company to review for, "any inaccuracies in it,
please let us know at once so that if appropriate, we can correct it."


March 26,  Lone Star Steakhouse filed its 10-K Annual Report, which included
as exhibits, Change of Control Agreements dated January 3, 2001 with certain
members of Management.


March 16,  Mr. Adams filed his Definitive Proxy materials with the SEC.


February 23,  Mr. Adams filed his Preliminary Proxy materials with the SEC.


February 22,  Mr. Adams mails an amended notice to Lone Star of his intent to
run as a Director at the 2001 annual meeting.


February 19,  Mr. Adams mailed notice to Lone Star of his intent to run as a
Director at the 2001 annual meeting.


e-mail us at voteadams2001@yahoo.com


* * * * * * * * * * * *

CERTAIN ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

The participants in the proposed solicitation of proxies ("Participants") are:
Guy W. Adams.  Mr. Adams has filed a definitive proxy statement with the
Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) in connection with a proposed
solicitation that the Participant may make with respect to shareholder proxies
for the 2001 Annual Meeting of Shareholders of Lone Star Steakhouse & Saloon.
The Definitive Proxy Statement contains important information, including
additional information about Mr. Adams and his nomination for election to the
Lone Star Board of Directors. You should read the Definitive Proxy Statement
in its entirety. It can be obtained at no charge on the SEC's web site at
(http://www.sec.gov) or by requesting a copy from Guy W. Adams 550 South Hope
Street, Ste 1825, Los Angeles, CA 90071.