Use these links to rapidly review the document
TABLE OF CONTENTS
ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA.
PART IV

Table of Contents

UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549

---

Form 10-K

Commission file number 1-31429

---

Valmont Industries, Inc.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

(402) 963-1000
(Registrant's telephone number, including area code)

         Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

         Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None

         Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes ý    No o

         Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act. Yes o    No ý

         Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Sections 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes ý    No o

         Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes ý    No o

         Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. o

         Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See definitions of "large accelerated filer," "accelerated filer," and "smaller reporting company" in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

         Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes o    No ý

         At February 17, 2012 there were 26,486,633 of the Company's common shares outstanding. The aggregate market value of the voting stock held by non-affiliates of the Company based on the closing sale price the common shares as reported on the New York Stock Exchange on June 25, 2011 was $2,375,190,227.

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

         Portions of the Company's proxy statement for its annual meeting of shareholders to be held on April 24, 2012 (the "Proxy Statement"), to be filed within 120 days of the fiscal year ended December 31, 2011, are incorporated by reference in Part III.

   

---

Table of Contents

VALMONT INDUSTRIES, INC.
Annual Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2011

TABLE OF CONTENTS

2

---

Table of Contents

PART I

ITEM 1.    BUSINESS.

(a)   General Description of Business

General

        We are a diversified global producer of fabricated metal products and are a leading producer of steel and aluminum pole, tower and other structures in our Engineered Infrastructure Products (EIP) segment, steel and concrete pole structures in our Utilities Support Structures (Utility) segment and are a global producer of mechanized irrigation systems in our Irrigation segment. We also provide metal coating services, including galvanizing, painting and anodizing in our Coatings segment. Our products sold through the EIP segment include outdoor lighting and traffic control structures, wireless communication structures and components and roadway safety and industrial access systems. Our pole structures sold through our Utility segment support electrical transmission and distribution lines and related power distribution equipment. Our Irrigation segment produces mechanized irrigation equipment that delivers water, chemical fertilizers and pesticides to agricultural crops. Customers and end-users of our products include state and federal governments, contractors, utility and telecommunications companies, manufacturers of commercial lighting fixtures and large farms as well as the general manufacturing sector. In 2011, approximately 44% our total sales were either sold in markets or produced by our manufacturing plants outside of North America. We were founded in 1946, went public in 1968 and our shares trade on the New York Stock Exchange (ticker: VMI).

Business Strategy

        Our strategy is to pursue growth opportunities that leverage our existing product portfolio, knowledge of our principal end-markets and customers and engineering capability to increase our sales, earnings and cash flow, including:

        Increasing the Market Penetration of our Existing Products.    Our strategy is to increase our market penetration by differentiating our products from our competitors' products through superior customer service, technological innovation and consistently high quality. For example, in recent years, our Utility segment increased its sales through our engineering capability, effective coordination of our production capacity and strong customer service to meet our customers' requirements, especially on large, complex projects. Our acquisition of Delta plc in May 2010 was in part intended to improve our market presence and penetration in the Australian lighting, communication and utility structures markets and the U.S. industrial galvanizing markets.

        Bringing our Existing Products to New Markets.    Our strategy is to expand the sales of our existing products into geographic areas where we do not currently have a strong presence as well as into applications for which end-users do not currently purchase our type of product. In recent years, our Utility business successfully expanded into new markets in Africa and we have also expanded our geographic presence in Europe and North Africa for lighting structures. We have also been successful introducing our pole products to utility and wireless communication applications where customers have traditionally purchased lattice tower products. Our strategy of building a manufacturing presence in China was based primarily on expanding our offering of pole structures for lighting, utility and wireless communication to the Chinese market. During 2011 we established manufacturing operations in India to provide pole structures for lighting, utility and wireless communications to the Indian market as well as galvanizing services. Our Irrigation segment has a long history of developing new mechanized irrigation markets in emerging markets. In recent years, these markets include China, the Middle East and Eastern Europe.

3

---

Table of Contents

        Developing New Products for Markets that We Currently Serve.    Our strategy is to grow by developing new products for markets where we have a comprehensive understanding of end-user requirements and longstanding relationships with key distributors and end-users. For example, in recent years we developed and sold structures for tramway applications in Europe. The customers for this product line include many of the state and local governments that purchase our lighting structures. Another example is the development and expansion of decorative product concepts for lighting applications that have been introduced to our existing customer base.

        Developing New Products for New Markets to Further Diversify our Business.    Our strategy is to increase our sales and diversify our business by developing new products for new markets. For example, we have been expanding our offering of specialized decorative lighting poles in the U.S. The decorative lighting market has different customers than our traditional markets and the products to serve that market are different than the poles we manufacture for the transportation and commercial markets. The acquisition of Delta gives us a presence in highway safety systems and industrial access systems, products that we believe are complementary to our existing products and provide us with future growth opportunities.

Acquisitions

        We have grown internally and by acquisition. Our significant business expansions during the past five years include:

2007

•

Acquisition of 70% of the outstanding shares of a lighting structure manufacturer headquartered in Kangasniemi, Finland



•

Acquisition of certain assets of a galvanizing operation located in Salina, Kansas

        2008

•

Acquisition of 70% of the outstanding shares of a lighting structure manufacturer headquartered in Canada



•

Acquisition of the assets of a manufacturer of utility and wireless communication poles in Hazelton, Pennsylvania



•

Acquisition of the assets of a wireless communication components distributor headquartered on Long Island, New York



•

Acquisition of the assets of a materials analysis, testing and inspection services business in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania



•

Formation of a 51% owned joint venture to manufacture steel structures in Turkey



•

Acquisition of the assets of a hot-dipped galvanizing operation located near Louisville, Kentucky



•

Acquisition of Stainton Metals, a steel lighting structure manufacturer located in England

        2010

•

Acquisition of Delta plc, a publicly-traded company headquartered in the United Kingdom that manufactures and distributes steel engineered products, provides galvanizing services and manufactures steel forged grinding media and electrolytic manganese dioxide

        2011

•

Acquisition of the remaining 40% not previously owned of Donhad Pty. Ltd., a forged steel grinding media manufacturer located in Australia

4

---

Table of Contents

•

Acquisition of an irrigation monitoring services company located in Brazil

        There have been no significant divestitures of businesses in the past five years. In 2011, we exited our structures joint venture in Turkey and ceased our structures sales and distribution operation in Italy. The impact of these events on our financial statements was not material.

(b)   Operating Segments

        We aggregate our operating segments into four reportable segments. We base our aggregation on similarity of operating segments as to economic characteristics, products, production processes, types or classes of customer and the methods of distribution.

        Our reportable segments are as follows:

        Engineered Infrastructure Products:    This segment consists of the manufacture of engineered metal structures and components for the global lighting and traffic, wireless communication, roadway safety and access systems applications;

        Utility Support Structures:    This segment consists of the manufacture of engineered steel and concrete structures for the global utility industry;

        Coatings:    This segment consists of galvanizing, anodizing and powder coating services on a global basis; and

        Irrigation:    This segment consists of the manufacture of agricultural irrigation equipment and related parts and services for the global agricultural industry.

        Other:    In addition to these four reportable segments, we have other operations and activities that individually are not more than 10% of consolidated sales. These activities include the manufacture of forged steel grinding media for the mining industry, tubular products for a variety of industrial customers, electrolytic manganese dioxide for disposable batteries and the distribution of industrial fasteners.

        Amounts of sales, operating income and total assets attributable to each segment for each of the last three years is set forth in Note 17 of our consolidated financial statements.

(c)   Narrative Description of Business

        Information concerning the principal products produced and services rendered, markets, competition and distribution methods for each of our four reportable segments is set forth below.

Engineered Infrastructure Products Segment

        Products Produced—We manufacture steel and aluminum poles and structures to which lighting and traffic control fixtures are attached for a wide range of outdoor lighting applications, such as streets, highways, parking lots, sports stadiums and commercial and residential developments. The demand for these products is driven by infrastructure, commercial and residential construction and by consumers' desire for well-lit streets, highways, parking lots and common areas to help make these areas safer at night and to support trends toward more active lifestyles and 24-hour convenience. In addition to safety, customers want products that are visually appealing. In Europe, we are a leader in decorative lighting poles, which are attractive as well as functional. We are leveraging this expertise to expand our decorative product sales in North America and China. Traffic poles are structures to which traffic signals are attached and aid the orderly flow of automobile traffic. While standard designs are available, poles are often engineered to customer specifications to ensure the proper function and safety of the structure. Product engineering takes into account factors such as weather (e.g. wind, ice) and the products loaded on the structure (e.g. lighting fixtures, traffic signals, signage) to determine the

5

---

Table of Contents

design of the pole. This product line also includes roadway safety systems, including guard rail barrier systems, wire rope safety barriers, crash attenuation barriers and other products designed to redirect vehicles when off course and to prevent collisions between vehicles. Highway safety systems are also designed and engineered to absorb collisions and ultimately reduce roadway fatalities and injury.

        We also manufacture and distribute of a broad range of structures (poles and towers) and components serving the wireless communication market. In the wireless communication market, a wireless communication cell site mainly consists of a steel pole or tower, shelter (enclosure where the radio equipment is located), antennas (devices that receive and transmit data and voice information to and from wireless communication devices) and components (items that are used to mount antennas to the structure and to connect cabling and other parts from the antennas to the shelter). For a given cell site, we provide poles, towers and components. We offer a wide range of structures to our customers, including solid rod, tubular and guyed towers, poles (tapered and non-tapered) and disguised products to minimize the visual impact of an antenna on an area. Structures are engineered and designed to customer specifications, which include factors such as the number of antennas on the structure and wind and soil conditions. Due to the size of these structures, design is important to ensure each structure meets performance and safety specifications. We do not provide any significant installation services on the structures we sell.

        We also produce access systems, which includes the manufacture and distribution of a broad range of structures and components used in the erection of infrastructure, industrial and commercial access systems, including floor gratings, handrails, barriers and sunscreens.

        Markets—The key markets for our lighting, traffic and roadway safety products are the transportation and commercial lighting markets and public roadway building and improvement. The transportation market includes street and highway lighting and traffic control, much of which is driven by government spending programs. For example, the U.S. government funds highway and road improvement through the federal highway program. This program provides funding to improve the nation's roadway system, which includes roadway lighting and traffic control enhancements. Matching funding from the various states may be required as a condition of federal funding. The current highway program is now expired and operating under extensions issued by Congress and we do not expect that the next multi-year highway spending program will be enacted until at least 2013. In North America, governments desire to improve road and highway systems by reducing traffic congestion. In the United States, there are approximately 4 million miles of public roadways, with approximately 24% carrying over 80% of the traffic. Accordingly, the need to improve traffic flow through traffic controls and lighting is a priority for many communities. Transportation markets in other areas of the world are also heavily funded by local and national governments. The commercial lighting market is mainly funded privately and includes lighting for applications such as parking lots, shopping centers, sports stadiums and business parks. The commercial lighting market is driven by macro economic factors such as general economic growth rates, interest rates and the commercial construction economy.

        The main markets for our communication products have been the wireless telephone carriers and build-to-suit companies (organizations that own cell sites and attach antennas from multiple carriers to the pole or tower structure). We also sell products to state and federal governments for two-way radio communication, radar, broadcasting and security applications. We believe long-term growth should mainly be driven by increased usage, technologies such as 4G (including applications for smart phones, such as streaming video and internet) and demand for improved emergency response systems, as part of the U.S. Homeland Security initiatives. Subscriber growth should continue to increase, although at a lower rate than in the past. In general, as the number of subscribers and usage of wireless communication devices increase, we believe this will result in demand for communication structures and components.

6

---

Table of Contents

        Markets for access systems are typically driven by infrastructure, industrial and commercial construction spending and can be cyclical depending on economic conditions in the markets in which we compete. Customers consist of construction firms or installers who participate in infrastructure, industrial and commercial construction projects, resellers such as steel service centers and end users.

        All of the products that we manufacture in this segment are customer investments in basic infrastructure and the total cost of these products can be substantial for our customers. Therefore, access to capital is important to their ability to fund future infrastructure needs. Due to the nature of these markets, demand can be cyclical as spending projects sometimes can be delayed due to funding or other issues.

        Competition—Our competitive strategy in all of the markets we serve is to provide high value to the customer at a reasonable price. We compete on the basis of product quality, high levels of customer service, timely, complete and accurate delivery of the product and design capability to provide the best solutions to our customers. There are numerous competitors in our markets, most of which are relatively small companies. Companies compete on the basis of price, product quality, reliable delivery and unique product features. Pricing can be very competitive, especially when demand is weak or when strong local currencies typically result in increased competition from imported products.

        Distribution Methods—Sales and distribution activities are handled through a combination of a direct sales force and commissioned agents. Lighting agents represent Valmont as well as lighting fixture companies and sell other related products. Sales are typically to electrical distributors, who provide the pole, fixtures and other equipment to the end user as a complete package. Commercial lighting and highway safety sales are normally made through Valmont sales employees, who work on a salary plus incentive, although some sales are made through independent, commissioned sales agents.

Utility Support Structures Segment

        Products Produced—We manufacture steel and concrete pole structures for electrical transmission, substation and distribution applications. Our products help move electrical power from where it is produced to where it is used. We produce tapered steel and pre-stressed concrete poles for high-voltage transmission lines, substations (which transfer high-voltage electricity to low-voltage transmission) and electrical distribution (which carry electricity from the substation to the end-user). In addition, we produce hybrid structures, which are structures with a concrete base section and steel upper sections. Utility structures can be very large, so product design engineering is important to the function and safety of the structure. Our engineering process takes into account weather and loading conditions, such as wind speeds, ice loads and the power lines attached to the structure, in order to arrive at the final design.

        Markets—Our sales in this segment are mainly in North America, where the key drivers in the utility business are significant upgrades in the electrical grid to support enhanced reliability standards, policy changes encouraging more generation from renewable energy sources, interconnection of regional grids to share more efficient generation to the benefit of the consumer and increased electrical consumption which has outpaced the transmission investment in the past decades. According to the Edison Electric Institute, the electrical transmission grid in the U.S. requires significant investment in the coming years to respond to the compelling industry drivers and lack of investment over the past 25 years. The expected increase in electrical consumption around the world should also require substantial investment in new electricity generation capacity which will prompt further international growth in transmission grid development. We expect these factors to result in increased demand for electrical utility structures to transport electricity from source to user.

        Competition—Our competitive strategy in this segment is to provide high value solutions to the customer at a reasonable price. We compete on the basis of product quality, engineering expertise, high

7

---

Table of Contents

levels of customer service and reliable, timely delivery of the product. There are many competitors. Companies compete on the basis of price, quality and service. Utility sales are often made through a competitive bid process, whereby the lowest bidder is awarded the contract, provided the competitor meets all other qualifying criteria. In weak markets, price is a more important criterion in the bid process.

        Distribution Methods—Products are normally sold through commissioned sales agents or sold directly to electrical utilities.

Coatings Segment

        Services Rendered—We add finishes to metals that inhibit corrosion, extend service lives and enhance physical attractiveness of a wide range of materials and products. Among the services provided include:

•

Hot-dipped Galvanizing



•

Anodizing



•

Powder Coating



•

E-Coating

        In our Coatings segment, we take unfinished products from our customers and return them with a galvanized, anodized or painted finish. Galvanizing is a process that protects steel with a zinc coating that is bonded to the product surface to inhibit rust and corrosion. Anodizing is a process applied to aluminum that oxidizes the surface of the aluminum in a controlled manner, which protects the aluminum from corrosion and allows the material to be dyed a variety of colors. We also paint products using powder coating and e-coating technology (where paint is applied through an electrical charge) for a number of industries and markets.

        Markets—Markets for our products are varied and our profitability is not substantially dependent on any one industry or customer. Demand for coatings services generally follows the local industrial economies. Galvanizing is used in a wide variety of industrial applications where corrosion protection of steel is desired. While markets are varied, our markets for anodized or painted products are more directly dependent on consumer markets than industrial markets.

        Competition—The Coatings markets are very fragmented, with a large number of competitors. Most of these competitors are relatively small, privately held companies who compete on the basis of price and personal relationships with their customers. Our strategy is to compete on the basis of quality of the coating finish and timely delivery of the coated product to the customer. We also use the production capacity at our network of plants to assure that the customer receives quality, timely service.

        Distribution Methods—Due to freight costs, a galvanizing location has an effective service area of an approximate 300 to 500 mile radius. While we believe that we are one of the largest custom galvanizers in North America, our sales are a small percentage of the total market. Sales and customer service are provided directly to the user by a direct sales force, generally assigned to each specific location.

Irrigation Segment

        Products Produced—We manufacture and distribute mechanical irrigation equipment and related service parts under the "Valley" brand name. A Valley irrigation machine usually is powered by electricity and propels itself over a farm field and applies water and chemicals to crops. Water and, in some instances, chemicals are applied through sprinklers attached to a pipeline that is supported by a series of towers, each of which is propelled via a drive train and tires. A standard mechanized irrigation

8

---

Table of Contents

machine (also known as a "center pivot") rotates in a circle, although we also manufacture and distribute center pivot extensions that can irrigate corners of square and rectangular farm fields as well as conform to irregular field boundaries (referred to as a "corner" machine). Our irrigation machines can also irrigate fields by moving up and down the field as opposed to rotating in a circle (referred to as a "linear" machine). Irrigation machines can be configured to irrigate fields in size from 4 acres to over 500 acres, with a standard size in the U.S. configured for a 160-acre tract of ground. One of the key components of our irrigation machine is the control system. This is the part of the machine that allows the machine to be operated in the manner preferred by the grower, offering control of such factors as on/off timing, individual field sector control, rate and depth of water and chemical application. We also offer growers options to control multiple irrigation machines through centralized computer control or mobile remote control. The irrigation machine used in international markets is substantially the same as the one produced for the North American market.

        There are other forms of irrigation available to farmers, two of the most prevalent being flood irrigation and drip irrigation. In flood irrigation, water is applied through a pipe or canal at the top of the field and allowed to run down the field by gravity. Drip irrigation involves plastic pipe or tape resting on the surface of the field or buried a few inches below ground level, with water being applied gradually. We estimate that center pivot and linear irrigation comprises one-third of the irrigated acreage in North America. International markets use predominantly flood irrigation, although all forms are used to some extent.

        Markets—Market drivers in North American and international markets are essentially the same. Since the purchase of an irrigation machine is a capital expenditure, the purchase decision is based on the expected return on investment. The benefits a grower may realize through investment in mechanical irrigation include improved yields through better irrigation, cost savings through reduced labor and lower water and energy usage. The purchase decision is also affected by current and expected net farm income, commodity prices, interest rates, the status of government support programs and water regulations in local areas. In many international markets, the relative strength or weakness of local currencies as compared with the U.S. dollar may affect net farm income, since export markets are generally denominated in U.S. dollars.

        The demand for mechanized irrigation comes from the following sources:

•

Conversion from flood irrigation



•

Replacement of existing mechanized irrigation machines



•

Converting land that is not irrigated to mechanized irrigation

        One of the key drivers in our Irrigation segment worldwide is that the usable water supply is limited. We estimate that:

•

Only 2.5% of total worldwide water supply is freshwater



•

Of that 2.5%, only 30% of freshwater is available to humans



•

The largest user of that freshwater is agriculture

        We believe these factors, along with the trend of a growing worldwide population and improving diets, reflect the need to use water more efficiently while increasing food production to feed this growing population. We believe that mechanized irrigation can improve water application efficiency by 40-90% compared with traditional irrigation methods by applying water uniformly near the root zone and reducing water runoff. Furthermore, reduced water runoff improves water quality in nearby rivers, aquifers and streams, thereby providing environmental benefits in addition to conservation of water.

        Competition—In North America, there are a number of entities that provide irrigation products and services to agricultural customers. We believe we are the leader of the four main participants in

9

---

Table of Contents

the mechanized irrigation business. Participants compete for sales on the basis of price, product innovation and features, product durability and reliability, quality and service capabilities of the local dealer. Pricing can become very competitive, especially in periods when market demand is low. In international markets, our competitors are a combination of our major U.S. competitors and privately-owned local companies. Competitive factors are similar to those in North America, although pricing tends to be a more prevalent competitive strategy in international markets. Since competition in international markets is local, we believe local manufacturing capability is important to competing effectively in international markets and we have that capability in key regions.

        Distribution Methods—We market our irrigation machines and service parts through independent dealers. There are approximately 200 dealers in North America, with another approximately 150 dealers serving international markets. The dealer determines the grower's requirements, designs the configuration of the machine, installs the machine (including providing ancillary products that deliver water and electrical power to the machine) and provides after-sales service. Our dealer network is supported and trained by our technical and sales teams. Our international dealers are supported through our regional headquarters in South America, South Africa, Western Europe, Australia, China and the Middle East as well as the home office in Valley, Nebraska.

General

        Certain information generally applicable to each of our four reportable segments is set forth below.

Suppliers and Availability of Raw Materials.

        Hot rolled steel coil and plate, zinc and other carbon steel products are the primary raw materials utilized in the manufacture of finished products for all segments. We purchase these essential items from steel mills, zinc producers and steel service centers and are usually readily available. While we may experience increased lead times to acquire materials and volatility in our purchase costs, we do not believe that key raw materials would be unavailable for extended periods. We have not experienced extended or wide-spread shortages of steel during this time, due to what we believe are strong relationships with some of the major steel producers. In the past several years, we experienced volatility in zinc and natural gas prices, but we did not experience any disruptions to our operations due to availability.

Patents, Licenses, Franchises and Concessions.

        We have a number of patents for our manufacturing machinery, poles and irrigation designs. We also have a number of registered trademarks. We do not believe the loss of any individual patent would have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations or liquidity.

Seasonal Factors in Business.

        Sales can be somewhat seasonal based upon the agricultural growing season and the infrastructure construction season. Sales of mechanized irrigation equipment and tubing to farmers are traditionally higher during the spring and fall and lower in the summer. Sales of infrastructure products are traditionally higher summer and fall and lower in the winter.

Customers.

        We are not dependent for a material part of any segment's business upon a single customer or upon very few customers. The loss of any one customer would not have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations or liquidity.

10

---

Table of Contents

Backlog.

        The backlog of orders for the principal products manufactured and marketed was $703.0 million at the end of the 2011 fiscal year and $411.0 million at the end of the 2010 fiscal year. We anticipate that most of the backlog of orders will be filled during fiscal year 2012. At year-end, the segments with backlog were as follows (dollar amounts in millions):

Research Activities.

        The information called for by this item is included in Note 1 of our consolidated financial statements.

Environmental Disclosure.

        We are subject to various federal, state and local laws and regulations pertaining to environmental protection and the discharge of materials into the environment. Although we continually incur expenses and make capital expenditures related to environmental protection, we do not anticipate that future expenditures should materially impact our financial condition, results of operations, or liquidity.

Number of Employees.

        At December 31, 2011, we had 9,476 employees.

(d)   Financial Information About Geographic Areas

        Our international sales activities encompass over 100 foreign countries. The information called for by this item is included in Note 17 of our consolidated financial statements beginning on page 76 of this report. While Australia and China accounted for approximately 18% and 6%, respectively, of our net sales in 2011, no other foreign country accounted for more than 5% of our net sales. Net sales for purposes of Note 17 include sales to outside customers.

(e)   Available Information

        We make available, free of charge through our Internet web site at http://www.valmont.com, our annual report on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K, and amendments to those reports filed or furnished pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as soon as reasonably practicable after such material is electronically filed with or furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission.

11

---

Table of Contents

ITEM 1A.    RISK FACTORS.

        The following risk factors describe various risks that may affect our business, financial condition and operations.

Increases in prices and reduced availability of key raw materials such as steel, aluminum and zinc will increase our operating costs and likely reduce our profitability.

        Hot rolled steel coil and other carbon steel products have historically constituted approximately one-third of the cost of manufacturing our products. We also use large quantities of aluminum for lighting structures and zinc for the galvanization of most of our steel products. The markets for the commodities that we use in our manufacturing processes can be volatile. The following factors increase the cost and reduce the availability of steel, aluminum and zinc for us:

•

increased demand, which occurs when other industries purchase greater quantities of these commodities at times when we require more steel, aluminum and zinc for manufacturing, which can result in higher prices and lengthen the time it takes to receive material from suppliers;



•

increased freight costs, because our manufacturing sites are usually not located near the major steel, aluminum and zinc manufacturers;



•

lower production levels of these commodities, due to reduced production capacities or shortages of materials needed to produce these commodities (such as coke and scrap steel for the production of steel) which could result in reduced supplies of these commodities, higher costs for us and increased lead times to acquire material;



•

lower inventory levels at suppliers when major steel users, such as the automobile manufacturers, increase their orders, which can reduce available inventory for us to meet our requirements;



•

increased cost of major inputs, such as scrap steel, coke, iron ore and energy;



•

fluctuations in foreign exchange rates can impact the relative cost of these commodities, which may affect the cost effectiveness of imported materials and limit our options in acquiring these commodities; and



•

international trade disputes, import duties and quotas, since we import some steel for our domestic and foreign manufacturing facilities.

        Increases in the selling prices of our products may not fully recover additional steel, aluminum and zinc costs and generally lag increases in our costs of these commodities. Consequently, an increase in steel, aluminum and zinc prices will increase our operating costs and likely reduce our profitability.

        Rising steel prices in 2010 and 2011 put pressure on gross profit margins, especially in our Engineered Infrastructure Products and Utility Support Structures segments. In both of these segments, the elapsed time between the quotation of a sales order and the manufacturing of the product ordered can be several months. As some of these sales are fixed price contracts, rapid increases in steel costs likely will result in lower operating income in these businesses. We believe the volatility over the past several years was due to significant increases in global steel production and consumption (especially in rapidly growing economies, such as China and India). The strong global demand for steel led to rapidly rising costs in key steel-making materials (such as coke, iron ore and scrap steel), thereby raising prices to companies that manufacture products from steel. Under such circumstances, steel supplies may become tighter and impact our ability to acquire steel and meet customer requirements on a timely basis. The speed with which steel suppliers impose price increases on us may prevent us from fully recovering these price increases and result in reduced operating margins, particularly in our lighting and traffic and utility businesses.

12

---

Table of Contents

Increases in energy prices will increase our operating costs and likely reduce our profitability.

        We use energy to manufacture and transport our products. Our costs of transportation and heating will increase if energy costs rise, which may occur due to additional energy usage caused by severe winter weather conditions and higher oil, gasoline and natural gas prices. Our galvanizing operations are susceptible to fluctuations in natural gas prices because we heat our processing tanks with natural gas. During periods of higher energy costs, we may not be able to recover our increased operating costs through sales price increases without reducing demand for our products. While we hedge a portion of our exposure to higher prices via energy futures contracts, increases in energy prices will increase our operating costs and likely reduce our profitability.

Current negative economic conditions could adversely affect our results

        The continuing uncertainties and softness in major economies (such as the European Union nations) and an apprehension among consumers may negatively impact the markets we serve in all of our operating segments. Additionally, unlike the cyclical downturns discussed below which may impact only one of our markets at a time, the current negative economic conditions may affect most or all of the markets we serve at the same time, reducing demand for our products and adversely affecting our operating results. These economic conditions may also impact the financial condition of one or more of our key suppliers, which could affect our ability to secure raw materials and components to meet our customers' demand for our products.

The ultimate consumers of our products operate in cyclical industries that have been subject to significant downturns which have adversely impacted our sales in the past and may again in the future.

        Our sales are sensitive to the market conditions present in the industries in which the ultimate consumers of our products operate, which in some cases have been highly cyclical and subject to substantial downturns. For example, a significant portion of our sales of support structures is to the electric utility industry. Our sales to the U.S. electric utility industry were over $500 million in 2011. Purchases of our products are deferrable to the extent that utilities may reduce capital expenditures for reasons such as unfavorable regulatory environments, a slow U.S. economy or financing constraints. In the event of weakness in the demand for utility structures due to reduced or delayed spending for electrical generation and transmission projects, our sales and operating income likely will decrease.

        The end users of our mechanized irrigation equipment are farmers and, as a result, sales of those products are affected by economic changes within the agriculture industry, particularly the level of farm income. In 2009, lower levels of farm income resulted in reduced demand for our mechanized irrigation and tubing products. Farm income decreases when commodity prices, acreage planted, crop yields, government subsidies and export levels decrease. In addition, weather conditions, such as extreme drought may result in reduced availability of water for irrigation, and can affect farmers' buying decisions. Farm income can also decrease as farmers' operating costs increase. Increases in oil and natural gas prices result in higher costs of energy and nitrogen-based fertilizer (which uses natural gas as a major ingredient). Furthermore, uncertainty as to future government agricultural policies may cause indecision on the part of farmers. The status and trend of government farm supports, financing aids and policies regarding the ability to use water for agricultural irrigation can affect the demand for our irrigation equipment. In the United States, certain parts of the country are considering policies that would restrict usage of water for irrigation. All of these factors may cause farmers to delay capital expenditures for farm equipment. Consequently, downturns in the agricultural industry will likely result in a slower, and possibly a negative, rate of growth in irrigation equipment and tubing sales. However, as the farm economy is cyclical, positive trends in these factors may results in stronger sales of irrigation and tubing sales. In 2011, favorable farm commodity prices and strong net farm income contributed to record demand for mechanized irrigation equipment sales.

13

---

Table of Contents

        We have also experienced cyclical demand for those of our products that we sell to the wireless communications industry. Sales of wireless structures to wireless carriers and build-to-suit companies that serve the wireless communications industry have historically been cyclical. These customers may elect to curtail spending on new structures to focus on cash flow and capital management. Weak market conditions have led to competitive pricing in recent years, putting pressure on our profit margins on sales to this industry. Changes in the competitive structure of the wireless industry, due to industry consolidation or reorganization, may interrupt capital plans of the wireless carriers as they assess their networks.

        As a result of the cyclical nature of these markets, we have experienced, and in the future we may experience, significant fluctuations in our sales and operating income with respect to a substantial portion of our total product offering, and such fluctuations could be material and adverse to our overall financial condition, results of operations and liquidity.

Demand for our infrastructure products and coating services is highly dependent upon the overall level of infrastructure spending.

        We manufacture and distribute engineered infrastructure products for lighting and traffic, utility and other specialty applications. Our Coatings segments serve many construction-related industries. Because these products are used primarily in infrastructure construction, sales in these businesses are highly correlated with the level of construction activity, which historically has been cyclical. Construction activity by our private and government customers is impacted by and can decline because of, among other things:

•

weakness in the general economy, which may negatively affect tax revenues, resulting in reduced funds available for construction;



•

interest rate increases, which increase the cost of construction financing; and



•

adverse weather conditions which slow construction activity.

        The current economic uncertainty and slowness in the United States and Europe will have some negative effect on our business. In our North American lighting product line, some of our lighting structure sales are for new residential and commercial areas. As residential and commercial construction remains weak, we have experienced some negative impact on our light pole sales to these markets. In a broader sense, in the event of an overall downturn in the economies in Europe or China, we may experience decreased demand if our customers have difficulty securing credit for their purchases from us.

        In addition, sales in our Engineered Infrastructure Products segment, particularly our lighting and traffic products, are highly dependent upon federal, state, local and foreign government spending on infrastructure development projects, such as the U.S. federal highway program. The level of spending on such projects may decline for a number of reasons beyond our control, including, among other things, budgetary constraints affecting government spending generally or transportation agencies in particular, decreases in tax revenues and changes in the political climate, including legislative delays, with respect to infrastructure appropriations. For instance, the lack of long-term U.S. federal highway spending legislation has had a negative impact on our sales in this market. A substantial reduction in the level of government appropriations for infrastructure projects could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations or liquidity.

We may lose some of our foreign investment or our foreign sales and profits may be reduced because of risks of doing business in foreign markets.

        We are an international manufacturing company with operations around the world. At December 31, 2011, we operated over 90 manufacturing plants, located on six continents, and sold our

14

---

Table of Contents

products in more than 100 countries. In 2011, approximately 44% of our total sales were either sold in markets or produced by our manufacturing plants outside of North America. We have operations in geographic markets that have recently experienced political instability, such as the Middle East, and economic uncertainty, such as Western Europe. We also have a significant manufacturing presence in Australia, Europe and China. We expect that international sales will continue to account for a significant percentage of our net sales into the foreseeable future. Accordingly, our foreign business operations and our foreign sales and profits are subject to the following potential risks:

•

political and economic instability where we have foreign business operations, resulting in the reduction of the value of, or the loss of, our investment;



•

recessions in economies of countries in which we have business operations, decreasing our international sales;



•

difficulties and costs of staffing and managing our foreign operations, increasing our foreign operating costs and decreasing profits;



•

difficulties in enforcing our rights outside the United States for patents on our manufacturing machinery, poles and irrigation designs;



•

increases in tariffs, export controls, taxes and other trade barriers reducing our international sales and our profit on these sales; and



•

acts of war or terrorism.

        As a result, we may lose some of our foreign investment or our foreign sales and profits may be materially reduced because of risks of doing business in foreign markets.

We are subject to currency fluctuations from our international sales, which can negatively impact our reported earnings.

        We sell our products in many countries around the world. Approximately 44% of our fiscal 2011 sales were generated by export demand or foreign markets and are often made in foreign currencies, mainly the Australian dollar, euro, Brazilian real, Canadian dollar, Chinese renminbi and South African rand. Because our financial statements are denominated in U.S. dollars, fluctuations in currency exchange rates between the U.S. dollar and other currencies have had and will continue to have an impact on our reported earnings. If the U.S. dollar weakens or strengthens versus the foreign currencies mentioned above, the result will be an increase or decrease in our reported sales and earnings, respectively. Currency fluctuations have affected our financial performance in the past and may affect our financial performance in any given period. In cases where local currencies are strong, the relative cost of goods imported from outside our country of operation becomes lower and affects our ability to compete profitably in our home markets. We experienced increased pricing competition in our access systems product line in Australia in 2011, due in part to the strong Australian dollar and resulting competition from companies outside of Australia.

        We also face risks arising from the imposition of foreign exchange controls and currency devaluations. Exchange controls may limit our ability to convert foreign currencies into U.S. dollars or to remit dividends and other payments by our foreign subsidiaries or businesses located in or conducted within a country imposing controls. Currency devaluations result in a diminished value of funds denominated in the currency of the country instituting the devaluation. Actions of this nature could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations and financial condition in any given period.

We face strong competition in our markets.

        We face competitive pressures from a variety of companies in each of the markets we serve. Our competitors include companies who provide the technologies that we provide as well as companies who

15

---

Table of Contents

provide competing technologies, such as drip irrigation. Our competitors include international, national, and local manufacturers, some of whom may have greater financial, manufacturing, marketing and technical resources than we do, or greater penetration in or familiarity with a particular geographic market than we have. In addition, certain of our competitors, particularly with respect to our utility and wireless communication product lines, have sought bankruptcy protection in recent years, and may emerge with reduced debt service obligations, which could allow them to operate at pricing levels that put pressures on our margins. Some of our customers have moved manufacturing operations or product sourcing overseas, which can negatively impact our sales of galvanizing and anodizing services. To remain competitive, we will need to invest continuously in manufacturing, product development and customer service, and we may need to reduce our prices, particularly with respect to customers in industries that are experiencing downturns. We cannot provide assurance that we will be able to maintain our competitive position in each of the markets that we serve.

We could incur substantial costs as the result of violations of, or liabilities under, environmental laws.

        Our facilities and operations are subject to U.S. and foreign laws and regulations relating to the protection of the environment, including those governing the discharge of pollutants into the air and water, the management and disposal of hazardous substances and wastes, and the cleanup of contamination. Failure to comply with these laws and regulations, or with the permits required for our operations, could result in fines or civil or criminal sanctions, third party claims for property damage or personal injury, and investigation and cleanup costs. Potentially significant expenditures could be required in order to comply with environmental laws that may be adopted or imposed in the future.

        Certain of our facilities have been in operation for many years and, over time, we and other predecessor operators of these facilities have generated, used, handled and disposed of hazardous and other regulated wastes. Contaminants have been detected at some of our present and former sites, principally in connection with historical operations. In addition, from time to time we have been named as a potentially responsible party under Superfund or similar state laws. While we are not aware of any contaminated sites that are not provided for in our financial statements, including third-party sites, at which we may have material obligations, the discovery of additional contaminants or the imposition of additional cleanup obligations at these sites could result in significant liability beyond amounts provided for in our financial statements.

We may not realize the improved operating results that we anticipate from acquisitions we may make in the future, and we may experience difficulties in integrating the acquired businesses or may inherit significant liabilities related to such businesses.

        We explore opportunities to acquire businesses that we believe are related to our core competencies from time to time, some of which may be material to us. We expect such acquisitions will produce operating results better than those historically experienced or presently expected to be experienced in the future by us in the absence of the acquisition. We cannot provide assurance that this assumption will prove correct with respect to any acquisition.

        Any future acquisitions may present significant challenges for our management due to the time and resources required to properly integrate management, employees, information systems, accounting controls, personnel and administrative functions of the acquired business with those of Valmont and to manage the combined company on a going forward basis. We may not be able to completely integrate and streamline overlapping functions or, if such activities are successfully accomplished, such integration may be more costly to accomplish than presently contemplated. We may also have difficulty in successfully integrating the product offerings of Valmont and acquired businesses to improve our collective product offering. Our efforts to integrate acquired businesses could be affected by a number of factors beyond our control, including general economic conditions. In addition, the process of integrating acquired businesses could cause the interruption of, or loss of momentum in, the activities

16

---

Table of Contents

of our existing business. The diversion of management's attention and any delays or difficulties encountered in connection with the integration of the Delta businesses could adversely impact our business, results of operations and liquidity, and the benefits we anticipate may never materialize. These factors are relevant to any acquisition we undertake.

        In addition, although we conduct reviews of businesses we acquire, we may be subject to unexpected claims or liabilities, including environmental cleanup costs, as a result of these acquisitions. Such claims or liabilities could be costly to defend or resolve and be material in amount, and thus could materially and adversely affect our business and results of operations and liquidity.

We have, from time to time, maintained a substantial amount of outstanding indebtedness, which could impair our ability to operate our business and react to changes in our business, remain in compliance with debt covenants and make payments on our debt.

        As of December 31, 2011, we had approximately $486 million of total indebtedness outstanding and our ratio of total interest-bearing debt to shareholders' equity was 41%. We had $261 million of additional borrowing capacity under our revolving credit facility at December 31, 2011. We normally borrow money to make business acquisitions and major capital expenditures. From time to time, our borrowings have been significant. Our level of indebtedness could have important consequences, including:

•

our ability to satisfy our obligations under our debt agreements could be affected and any failure to comply with the requirements, including significant financial and other restrictive covenants, of any of our debt agreements could result in an event of default under the agreements governing our indebtedness;



•

a substantial portion of our cash flow from operations will be required to make interest and principal payments and will not be available for operations, working capital, capital expenditures, expansion, or general corporate and other purposes, including possible future acquisitions that we believe would be beneficial to our business;



•

our ability to obtain additional financing in the future may be impaired;



•

we may be more highly leveraged than our competitors, which may place us at a competitive disadvantage;



•

our flexibility in planning for, or reacting to, changes in our business and industry may be limited; and



•

our degree of leverage may make us more vulnerable in the event of a downturn in our business, our industry or the economy in general.

        Any of these factors could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations, cash flows and business prospects.

        The restrictions and covenants in our debt agreements could limit our ability to obtain future financings, make needed capital expenditures, withstand a future downturn in our business, or the economy in general, or otherwise conduct necessary corporate activities. These covenants may prevent us from taking advantage of business opportunities that arise.

        A large share of our consolidated cash balances are outside the United States and most of our interest-bearing debt is carried by U.S. entities. In the event that we would have to repatriate cash from international operations to meet cash needs in the U.S., we are likely to incur significant income tax expenses to repatriate that cash.

        A breach of any of these covenants would result in a default under the applicable debt agreement. A default, if not waived, could result in acceleration of the debt outstanding under the agreement and

17

---

Table of Contents

in a default with respect to, and acceleration of, the debt outstanding under our other debt agreements. The accelerated debt would become immediately due and payable. If that should occur, we may not be able to pay all such debt or to borrow sufficient funds to refinance it. Even if new financing were then available, it may not be on terms that are favorable to us.

We assumed an underfunded pension liability as part of the Delta acquisition and the combined company may be required to increase funding of the plan and/or be subject to restrictions on the use of excess cash.

        Delta is the sponsor of a defined benefit pension plan that, as of December 31, 2011, covered approximately 7,000 members in the United Kingdom. All of these members are inactive or retired former Delta employees. At December 31, 2011, this plan was, for accounting purposes, underfunded by approximately £44.1 million ($68.0 million). Although this underfunded position and the current agreement with the trustees of the pension plan for annual funding until March 31, 2018 of approximately £6.3 million ($9.7 million) in respect of the funding shortfall and approximately £1.0 million ($1.5 million) in respect of administrative expenses were considered in determining the offer price for Delta shares, the underfunded position may adversely affect the combined company as follows:

•

Laws and regulations normally require a new funding plan to be agreed every three years, with the next few funding plans to be agreed with the plan trustees by June 30, 2013. Changes in actuarial assumptions, including future discount, inflation and interest rates, investment returns and mortality rates, may increase the underfunded position of the pension plan and cause the combined company to increase its funding levels in the pension plan to cover underfunded liabilities.



•

The pension plan is regulated in the United Kingdom and trustees represent the interests of covered workers. Laws and regulations could create an immediate funding obligation to the pension plan which could be significantly greater than the £44.1 million ($68.0 million) assumed for accounting purposes as of December 31, 2011 and calculated by reference to the cost of buying out liabilities on the insurance market, and could impact the ability to use Delta's existing cash or the combined company's future excess cash to grow the business or finance other obligations. The use of Delta's cash and future cash flows beyond the operation of Delta's business or the satisfaction of Delta's obligations would require negotiations with the trustees and regulators.

ITEM 1B.    UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS.

        None.

ITEM 2.    PROPERTIES.

        Our corporate headquarters are located in a leased facility in Omaha, Nebraska, under a lease expiring in 2016. The headquarters of the Company's reportable segments are located in Valley, Nebraska except for the headquarters of the Company's Utility Support Structures segment, which is located in Birmingham, Alabama. We also maintain a management headquarters in Sydney, Australia. Most of our significant manufacturing locations are owned or are subject to long-term renewable leases. Our principal manufacturing locations are in Valley, Nebraska, McCook, Nebraska, Tulsa, Oklahoma, Brenham, Texas, Charmeil, France and Shanghai, China. All of these facilities are owned by us. We believe that our manufacturing capabilities and capacities are adequate for us to effectively serve our customers. Our capital spending programs consist of investment for replacement, achieving operational efficiencies and expand capacities where needed. Our principal operating locations by reportable segment are listed below.

        Engineered Infrastructure Products segment North America manufacturing locations are in Nebraska, Texas, Indiana, Minnesota, Oregon, Washington and Canada. The largest of these operations

18

---

Table of Contents

are in Valley, Nebraska and Brenham, Texas, both of which are owned facilities. We have communication components distribution locations in New York, California and Georgia. International locations are in France, the Netherlands, Finland, Estonia, England, Germany, Poland, Australia, Indonesia, the Philippines, Thailand, Malaysia, India and China. The largest of these operations are in Charmeil, France and Shanghai, China, both of which are owned facilities. Access systems manufacturing locations are located in Australia, Indonesia, the Philippines, Thailand, Malaysia and China.

        Utility Support Structures segment North America manufacturing locations are in Alabama, Georgia, Florida, California, Texas, Oklahoma, Pennsylvania, Tennessee, Kansas and Mexico. The largest of these operations are in Tulsa, Oklahoma and Mansfield and Bellville, Texas. The Tulsa and Bellville facilities are owned and the Mansfield facility is leased. Principal international manufacturing locations are in China and France.

        Coatings segment North America operations are located in Nebraska, Illinois, California, Minnesota, Kansas, Iowa, Indiana, Oregon, Utah, Oklahoma, Virginia, Alabama, Florida and South Carolina. International operations are located in Australia, Malaysia and India.

        Irrigation segment North America manufacturing operations are located in Valley and McCook, Nebraska. Our principal manufacturing operations serving international markets are located in Uberaba, Brazil, Nigel, South Africa, Jebel Ali, United Arab Emirates, Madrid, Spain and Shandong, China. All facilities are owned except for China, which is leased.

        Our other North America operations are located in Nebraska and Oregon. International operations are located in Australia (forged steel grinding media) and South Africa (electrolytic manganese dioxide).

ITEM 3.    LEGAL PROCEEDINGS.

        We are not a party to, nor are any of our properties subject to, any material legal proceedings. We are, from time to time, engaged in routine litigation incidental to our businesses.

ITEM 4.    MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES.

        Not Applicable.

Executive Officers of the Company

        Our executive officers at December 31, 2011, their ages, positions held, and the business experience of each during the past five years are, as follows:

Mogens C. Bay, age 63, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer since January 1997.

Terry J. McClain, age 64, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer since January 1997.

Todd G. Atkinson, age 55, Executive Vice President since February 2011. Chief Executive Officer of Delta plc from July 2003 until February 2011.

Mark C. Jaksich, age 54, Vice President and Controller since February 2000.

Walter P. Pasko, age 61, Vice President-Procurement since May 2002.

Brian J. Desigio, age 42, Vice President-Corporate Development since April 2008. Senior Vice President at Fairmount Food Group from January 2006 to April 2008.

Vanessa K. Brown, age 59, Vice President-Human Resources since July 2011. Director of Human Resources of North America Engineered Infrastructure Products division from 1997 until 2011.

Steven G. Kaniewski, age 40, Vice-President of Information Technology since August 2010. Vice President of Global IT Applications from September 2007 until August 2010 and Vice President of Operations (Specialty Division) from November 1999 until September 2007 at Belden, Inc.

19

---

Table of Contents

PART II

ITEM 5.    MARKET FOR REGISTRANT'S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS, AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES.

        Our common stock is traded on the New York Stock Exchange under the symbol "VMI". We had approximately 5,000 shareholders of common stock at December 31, 2011. Other stock information required by this item is included in "Quarterly Financial Data (unaudited)" on page 88 of this report.

Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

        During the fourth quarter, the shares reflected above were those delivered to the Company by employees as part of stock option exercises, either to cover the purchase price of the option or the related taxes payable by the employee as part of the option exercise. The price paid per share was the market price at the date of exercise.

20

---

Table of Contents

ITEM 6.    SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA.

SELECTED FIVE-YEAR FINANCIAL DATA

21

---

Table of Contents

22

---

Table of Contents

23

---

Table of Contents

24

---

Table of Contents

ITEM 7.    MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATION.

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

Forward-Looking Statements

        Management's discussion and analysis, and other sections of this annual report, contain forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These forward-looking statements are based on assumptions that management has made in light of experience in the industries in which the Company operates, as well as management's perceptions of historical trends, current conditions, expected future developments and other factors believed to be appropriate under the circumstances. These statements are not guarantees of performance or results. They involve risks, uncertainties (some of which are beyond the Company's control) and assumptions. Management believes that these forward-looking statements are based on reasonable assumptions. Many factors could affect the Company's actual financial results and cause them to differ materially from those anticipated in the forward-looking statements. These factors include, among other things, risk factors described from time to time in the Company's reports to the Securities and Exchange Commission, as well as future economic and market circumstances, industry conditions, company performance and financial results, operating efficiencies, availability and price of raw materials, availability and market acceptance of new products, product pricing, domestic and international competitive environments, and actions and policy changes of domestic and foreign governments.

        The following discussion and analysis provides information which management believes is relevant to an assessment and understanding of our consolidated results of operations and financial position.

25

---

Table of Contents

This discussion should be read in conjunction with the Consolidated Financial Statements and related Notes.

General

26

---

Table of Contents

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

FISCAL 2011 COMPARED WITH FISCAL 2010

Acquisition of Delta plc

        On May 12, 2010, we acquired Delta plc (Delta). The total amount of the acquisition was $436.7 million and was financed by a combination of cash, borrowings under our revolving credit agreement of $85.0 million and $300.0 million of senior unsecured notes.

        We began consolidating Delta's financial results in our consolidated financial statements beginning on May 12, 2010. On a segment reporting basis, Delta's operations are included in our results as follows:

Engineered Infrastructure Products (EIP) Segment-manufacture of poles, roadway safety systems and access systems;

Utility Support Structures (Utility) Segment-manufacture of pole structures;

Coatings Segment-galvanizing operations in Australia, the U.S. and Asia; and

Other-manufacture of steel grinding media and electrolytic manganese dioxide

        The increases in sales and operating income by segment attributable to a full year effect of Delta in fiscal 2011, as compared with fiscal 2010, were as follows (in millions):

Overview

        On a consolidated basis, the increase in net sales in fiscal 2011, as compared with 2010, was primarily the result of improved sales in all reportable segments, part of which was the result of Delta's financial results being included in our consolidated financial statements for all of 2011. In addition, fiscal 2011 included 53 weeks of operations, as compared with fiscal 2010, which was 52 weeks. This was the result of our fiscal year end being on the last Saturday in December. Accordingly, all fiscal 2011 operational figures were higher than had fiscal 2011 been 52 weeks in length. The estimated impact on our net sales and net earnings due to the extra week of fiscal 2011 was approximately $50 million and $3 million, respectively.

        For the company as a whole, without consideration of Delta, our 2011 increase over 2010 was mainly due to increased unit sales volumes of approximately $400 million. On a reportable segment basis, the most significant unit sales volume increase were in the Irrigation and USS segments. Sales prices overall were up modestly in fiscal 2011, as compared with 2010, mainly in response to rising steel prices. In the aggregate, the sales increase in 2011, as compared with 2010, due to price increases and sales mix changes was approximately $14 million.

27

---

Table of Contents

        Our fiscal 2011 sales and operating income in comparison to 2010 were enhanced by foreign currency translation. On average, the U.S. dollar was weaker than most global currencies in 2011 as compared with 2010. These effects by segment were as follows (in millions of dollars):

        The decrease in gross profit margin (gross profit as a percent of sales) in fiscal 2011, as compared with 2010, was due to higher average raw material costs in 2011 as compared with 2010. In particular, steel prices rose significantly in the first quarter of 2011 before moderating somewhat in the following two quarters. Average zinc costs also were higher in 2011 than in 2010. These higher costs were not recovered entirely through increased selling prices, mainly due to a competitive selling price environment, especially in the EIP and Utility segments. In the aggregate, we estimate that the impact of these factors in 2011, as compared with 2010, was approximately $29 million.

        Selling, general and administrative (SG&A) spending in fiscal 2011, as compared with 2010, increased due to the following factors:

•

Expenses associated with the full year Delta operations ($32.5 million) in our consolidated accounts in 2011;



•

Increased employee incentive accruals of $20.9 million, due to improved operating results, and;



•

Increased compensation expenses of $12.1 million, associated with increased employment levels and salary increases.

        These increases were somewhat offset by $13.2 million in lower acquisition and integration costs in the fiscal 2011, as compared with 2010, associated with the Delta acquisition.

        The increase in operating income on a reportable segment basis in 2011, as compared with 2010, was due to improved operating performance in the Irrigation, Utility and Coatings segments reported improved operating income in fiscal 2011, as compared with 2010. The EIP segment operating income in 2011 was lower than fiscal 2010. The "Other" category also reported improved operating profit in 2011, as the grinding media, tubing and manganese dioxide operations were improved over 2010. Currency translation effects also contributed to the increase in operating income in fiscal 2011, as compared with 2010, of approximately $5.2 million.

        The increase in interest expense in fiscal 2011, as compared with 2010, was attributable to:

•

$2.8 million of expense incurred when we redeemed our senior subordinated debt;



•

$5.0 million of expense related to the full year effect of interest expense associated with the $300 million in senior unsecured notes issued in April 2010, less;



•

$2.9 million of bank fees incurred in the first quarter of fiscal 2010 to provide the required bridge loan funding commitment for the Delta acquisition and the full year effect of interest income from Delta's cash balances (approximately $2 million).

28

---

Table of Contents

        The increase in "Other" expense in fiscal 2011, as compared with 2010, was mainly due to investment losses in the assets held in our deferred compensation plan of $1.5 million. The decrease in the value of these assets was offset by a corresponding decrease in our deferred compensation liabilities, which were reflected as a decrease in net corporate expense. Accordingly, there was no effect on net earnings from these investment losses. In addition, we incurred approximately $1.5 million of currency translation losses due the dissolution of our joint venture in Turkey.

        Our effective income tax rate in fiscal 2011 was substantially lower than 2010. This reduction was mainly due to tax benefits associated with a legal restructuring of Delta in the fourth quarter of 2011. The restructuring was completed to gain certain operational efficiencies and resulted in an aggregate income tax benefit of $66.0 million related to an increase in the tax basis of assets in Australia and removing valuation allowances to certain U.K. deferred tax assets associated with tax loss carryforwards. The restructuring will allow us to generate U.K.-based income sufficient to utilize those tax loss carryforwards. See "Critical Accounting Policies—Income Taxes" for a more detailed discussion of the legal restructuring and the associated tax. In 2010, we realized an unfavorable effect in 2010 related to non-deductibility of a portion of the Delta acquisition expenses (approximately $3.2 million). In 2011, the following items resulted in favorable effects to income taxes:

•

income tax benefits associated with our 2011 acquisition of the remaining 40% of Donhad that we did not own ($4.1 million);



•

income tax provisions in our South African manganese dioxide operation that were no longer needed due to a favorable tax authority ruling ($3.2 million);



•

net effect of certain income tax contingencies in 2011 that were reduced due to expiration of statutes of limitation ($1.4 million).

        Aside from these events that are non-recurring in nature, we believe our effective tax rate in fiscal 2011 and 2010 would have been approximately 32.0-33.0%.

        Earnings attributable to noncontrolling interests was higher in 2011, as compared with 2010, mainly due to improved earnings in our manganese dioxide operation, which is 45% owned by noncontrolling interests. Earnings in non-consolidated subsidiaries improved in 2011, as compared with 2010, as our 49% owned manganese materials operation experienced improved profitability.

        The improvement in net earnings and earnings per share in 2011, as compared with 2010, were mainly attributed to the improved operating income and the tax benefits associated with the legal entity restructuring in 2011 ($66.0 million and $2.49 per share, respectively). See "Critical Accounting Policies—Income Taxes" for a more detailed discussion of the legal restructuring and the associated tax effects.

        Our cash flows provided by operations were approximately $149.7 million in 2011, as compared with $152.2 million in 2010. While net earnings increased in 2011, as compared with 2010, operating cash flow was slightly lower than 2010 due mainly to the following factors:

•

higher levels of working capital to support increased business activity in the Utility and Irrigation segments in 2011;



•

the income tax benefits associated with the legal entity restructuring completed in the fourth quarter of 2011 ($66.0 million) were non-cash in nature, and;



•

contributions to the Delta Pension Plan of $11.9 million in 2011.

Engineered Infrastructure Products (EIP) segment

        The increase in net sales in fiscal 2011 as compared with 2010 was mainly due to the full year effect of the Delta operations and currency translation effects. Global lighting markets continue to

29

---

Table of Contents

experience relatively weak demand, resulting in increased price competition, despite higher raw material prices. In the Lighting product line, 2011 North American sales in 2011 were down slightly as compared with 2010. Market conditions in North America continue to be weak, especially in the transportation market, where funding is through federal, state and local governments. We believe sales demand in the transportation market was dampened by the lack of a long-term federal highway funding legislation and state budget deficits, as the lack of long-term funding legislation does not give the various states ample visibility to implement long-term initiatives. Furthermore, highway spending sponsored under the federal program requires the various states to provide part of required funding. Many states are in budget deficits, which may constrain their ability to access federal matching funds to implement roadway projects. Sales in other market channels helped to offset the lower transportation market sales in 2011, as compared with 2010. In Europe, sales were approximately $22 million higher in fiscal 2011, as compared with 2010, most of which was related to increased sales volumes. However, sales pricing and product mix generally were unfavorable in light of higher material costs, due to weaker infrastructure spending in Europe related to budget deficit control measures and public debt issues.

        Communication product line sales in fiscal 2011 were comparable to 2010. North America sales were slightly higher in 2011 than 2010. While market conditions were generally more favorable in 2011 as compared with 2010, we believe uncertainty surrounding the AT&T/T-Mobile merger has caused demand for communication structures and components to slow down in the last half of 2011. In China, sales of wireless communication structures were slightly higher in fiscal 2011, as compared with 2010. In 2010, annual supply contracts with Chinese wireless carriers were settled later than in the past and 2011 was more in line with what we believe is a more normal demand pattern.

        Sales in the access systems product line in Australia in 2011 were comparable with 2010, not including the full year effect from the Delta acquisition, as industrial construction was overall stable and mining investment was in the early stages of project feasibility and scope. Asia sales in this product line were higher by approximately $7.5 million in 2011 as compared with 2010, as markets in the region generally were stronger, particularly in China, Indonesia and the Middle East.

        Sales of highway safety products in 2011 were comparable with 2010 in local currency terms, not including the full year effect from the Delta acquisition. Floods in parts of Australia affected infrastructure spending in the first two quarters of 2011, as public spending priorities shifted from roadway development to supporting recovery from the floods.

        Operating income for the segment in fiscal 2011 was lower as compared with 2010. While operating income was enhanced by the full year effect of the Delta operations and currency translation effects, the impact of higher raw material costs, slowness in demand and very competitive pricing conditions in most of our lighting markets hampered operating income for the segment by approximately $19 million in 2011, as compared with 2010. The operating income associated with the Delta operations, aside from the full year effect of the acquisition, was comparable with 2010. The strong Australian dollar led to pricing and margin pressures, as imported products from outside of Australia were more competitive from a pricing standpoint. In Europe, we were affected by competitive pricing pressures that negatively affected segment operating profit by approximately $3.2 million in 2011, as compared with 2010. The increase in SG&A expense in fiscal 2011 was mainly due to the acquisition of the Delta operations ($15.9 million), currency translation effects of $4.8 million and the fourth quarter write down of the PiRod trade name of $3.0 million.

Utility Support Structures (Utility) segment

        In the Utility segment, the sales increase in fiscal 2011, as compared with 2010, was due to improved unit sales volumes in the U.S., offset to a degree by lower sales prices in the U.S. and lower sales volumes in international markets. In U.S. markets, electrical utility companies are increasing their

30

---

Table of Contents

investment in the electrical grid over a relatively slow 2010. The sales pricing environment is slowly improving but continues to be very competitive. Our sales in 2011 were somewhat reflective of market conditions in 2010 when certain utility structures projects were awarded at relatively low prices. In total, we experienced slightly lower average selling prices on our 2011 sales, as compared with 2010 (approximately $14 million). In international markets, the sales decrease was mainly due to lower project sales into emerging markets of approximately $25 million.

        Operating income in fiscal 2011, as compared with 2010, increased due to the substantial increase in North America sales volume and associated operational leverage. Gross profit margins were negatively affected by the competitive pricing environment in North America and higher raw material costs. The increase in SG&A expense for the segment in fiscal 2011 was higher than in 2010, mainly due to increased employee incentives ($6.7 million) associated with the increase in operating income and $2.0 million in increased compensation expenses.

Coatings segment

        Net sales in the Coatings segment increased in fiscal 2011, as compared with 2010, mainly due to the full year effect of the Delta operations and currency translation effects and improved sales volumes in North America and Asia Pacific. Unit pricing effects on sales for the segment were not significant in 2011, as compared with 2010.

        The increase in segment operating income in fiscal 2011, as compared with 2010, was mainly due to the effects of currency translation and improved productivity and operating leverage through volume increases. Higher average zinc costs in 2011, as compared with 2010, were largely recovered through productivity improvements. The increase in operating income in fiscal 2011, as compared with 2010, also was due to the effect of the acquired Delta operations. SG&A expenses for the segment in fiscal 2011 were higher than the comparable periods in 2010, mainly due to the effect of the Delta businesses ($7.2 million), incentives due to improved operating income ($1.0 million) and the write down of the Industrial Galvanizers of America trade name ($0.8 million) in 2011.

        In 2011, one of our galvanizing facilities in Australia incurred damages from a storm and a fire later in the year. A property damage and business interruption claim was filed with our insurance carrier and settlement of the claim is ongoing. We made the necessary capital expenditures to restore the facility and operations commenced late in the fourth quarter of 2011. The insurance claim proceeds agreed to with the insurance carrier in 2011 exceeded the net book value of the assets damaged. The financial effect of this event resulted in an improvement in segment operating results in the fourth quarter of 2011 of approximately $1.5 million.

Irrigation segment

        The increase in Irrigation segment net sales in fiscal 2011, as compared with 2010, was mainly due to improved sales volumes of approximately $195 million. The remainder of the sales increase was associated with pricing (to recover higher raw material costs) and favorable product mix (approximately $20 million) and currency translation effects (approximately $3 million). In global markets, the sales growth was due to a very strong agricultural economies around the world. Farm commodity prices were generally favorable throughout 2011 and net farm income was at record levels in the United States and favorable in most markets. We believe that farm commodity prices have been favorable due to strong demand, including consumption in the production of ethanol and other fuels, and traditionally low inventories of major farm commodities. In addition, weather conditions in North America in 2011 were generally drier than 2010, further enhancing demand for irrigation machines and related service parts. In international markets, the sales improvement in fiscal 2011, as compared with 2010, was realized in most markets, particularly in Asia Pacific and South America.

31

---

Table of Contents

        Operating income for the segment improved in 2011 over 2010, due to improved sales unit volumes in North America and the associated operational leverage. The most significant reasons for the increase in SG&A expense in 2011, as compared with 2010, was related to employee compensation costs to support the increase in sales activity and future initiatives ($5.4 million) and increased employee incentives due to improved operating performance in 2011 ($3.0 million).

Other

        This unit includes the Delta grinding media and electrolytic manganese operations and our industrial tubing and fasteners operations. The increase in sales in fiscal 2011, as compared with 2010, was mainly due improved sales volumes in all of these operations and currency translation effects (approximately $13.9 million). Fiscal 2011 operating income improved due to the full year effect of the Delta operations, improved operating results in the manganese dioxide and tubing operations and currency translation (approximately $1.7 million).

Net corporate expense

        Net corporate expense in fiscal 2011 was comparable to 2010. Corporate expenses decreased in fiscal 2011, as compared with 2010, due to Delta acquisition and integration costs that were incurred in 2010 ($13.2 million) but not 2011 and lower deferred compensation expense ($1.5 million). These decreases were offset somewhat by the full year effect of Delta's administration costs ($5.2 million) and higher employee incentive expense associated with improved profitability in 2011 as compared with 2010 ($9.7 million) and increased compensation expenses ($2.7 million).

FISCAL 2010 COMPARED WITH FISCAL 2009

Acquisition of Delta plc

        On March 4, 2010, we made an offer to acquire all the ordinary shares of Delta plc ("Delta"), a public company traded on the London Stock exchange under the symbol "DLTA". The offer price was £1.85 per ordinary share, with a total estimated purchase price of $436.7 million. To manage the foreign exchange risk associated with the offer, we executed a forward foreign exchange contract with a multinational bank, whereby, if the acquisition was completed, the required British pound sterling would be delivered to us at a fixed exchange rate of $1.5353/£ to complete the acquisition. In accordance with takeover rules in the United Kingdom, we established funding for the purchase price and related acquisition costs by a combination of $264 million in restricted cash (comprised of cash balances of $83 million and $181 million in borrowings under our revolving credit agreement) and a $200 million bank bridge loan commitment. In April 2010, we issued $300 million of senior unsecured notes, terminated the bridge loan and reduced our revolving credit agreement borrowings to approximately $85 million. We completed the acquisition on May 12, 2010 and we now own 100% of Delta's ordinary shares. In December 2010, we acquired all of Delta's preference shares for approximately £2.9 million (approximately $4.4 million).

        We began consolidating Delta's financial results in our consolidated financial statements on May 12, 2010. Delta's sales included in our consolidated results for the period of May 12, 2010 to December 25, 2010 were $348.0 million. Delta's operating income over the same period was $26.4 million and includes approximately $10.1 million of expenses related to amortization, depreciation and other items related to purchase accounting adjustments. At December 25, 2010, we recast our reportable segments to align with our management reporting structure, as a result of this reorganization, Delta's:

•

Galvanizing operations in the U.S., Asia and Australia are reported as part of our Coatings segment;

32

---

Table of Contents

•

Engineered steel products operations for structures and access systems are reported as part of the Engineered Infrastructure Products segment;



•

Grinding media and manganese dioxide operations are reported as "Other"; and



•

Head office administration expenses (including expenses associated with the Delta Pension Plan) are reported as part of "Net corporate expense".

        In fiscal 2010, certain other expenses were incurred in our consolidated statement of operations that were associated with the Delta acquisition. These expenses included:

•

SG&A expenses of $15.3 million related to acquisition costs such as investment banking fees, due diligence costs and other expenses directly associated with the acquisition and integration of Delta with Valmont. These costs, under applicable accounting standards, are required to be recorded as expenses as incurred.



•

Interest expenses aggregating $5.1 million incurred in fiscal 2010 related to fees and expenses to establish the bridge loan and borrowing costs incurred to finance the acquisition prior to the May 12, 2010 acquisition date.

        The after-tax impact of these expenses on our net earnings in fiscal 2010 was approximately $16.4 million.

Overview

        On a consolidated basis, the net sales increase in fiscal 2010, as compared with 2009, was mainly due to:

•

The acquisition of Delta, which contributed $348.0 million in net sales beginning May 12, 2010;



•

Improved sales unit volumes in the Irrigation and Coatings segments; and



•

Lower sales unit volumes and lower average selling prices in the EIP and Utility segments;

        For the company as a whole, without consideration of Delta sales, our fiscal 2010 sales unit volumes were approximately 3% lower as compared with 2009. On a reportable segment basis, the most significant sales unit volume decrease was in the Utility segment, offset somewhat by increased unit sales volumes in the Irrigation and Coatings segments. Lower unit sales prices and unfavorable sales mix also contributed the lower net sales in 2010, as compared with 2009. Sales price decreases in 2010, as compared with 2009, resulted from a combination of weaker sales demand and increased price competition in most of our businesses.

        The gross profit margin (gross profit as a percent of sales) in 2010 was lower than 2009. This decrease in gross profit margins were mainly due to lower gross margins in the Utility and EIP segments, where we were impacted by a more competitive pricing environment and an unfavorable sales mix. The impact of these factors on gross profit margins was offset to a degree by lower average raw material costs in 2010, as compared with 2009 (approximately $55 million). Rising raw material prices also resulted in $3.0 million in LIFO expense in 2010, as compared with a $18.6 million LIFO benefit in 2009. On a reportable segment basis, we realized higher LIFO expense in the EIP ($9.6 million), Irrigation ($6.9 million) and Utility ($4.0 million) segments in 2010, as compared with 2009.

        Selling, general and administrative (SG&A) spending in fiscal 2010, as compared with 2009, increased due to the following factors:

•

Expenses associated with the Delta acquisition and integration of approximately $15.3 million. These expenses were related to investment banking fees, due diligence costs and other direct

33

---

Table of Contents

costs associated with the acquisition and the integration of Delta's operations. These expenses are reported as part of "General corporate expense";

•

Delta's SG&A expenses from May 12, 2010 to December 25, 2010 of $54.4 million, were included in 2010 consolidated SG&A expenses.

        These increases were somewhat offset by lower employee incentive expenses in 2010, as compared with 2009 (approximately $12.5 million), lower sales commissions related to lower net sales in 2010, as compared with 2009 (approximately $3.7 million). In the aggregate, exclusive of the SG&A expenses related to Delta's operations and its expenses incidental to its acquisition, SG&A spending was down approximately $22.5 million in fiscal 2010, as compared with 2009.

        On a reportable segment basis, the EIP and Utility segments reported lower operating income and the Irrigation and Coatings segments reported higher operating income in the fiscal 2010, as compared with 2009.

        The increase in net interest expense in fiscal 2010, as compared with 2009, was mainly due to interest associated with the $300 million in senior unsecured notes issued in April 2010 and approximately $2.9 million of bank fees incurred in 2010 related to providing the required bridge loan funding commitment for the Delta acquisition. "Other" income was lower in fiscal 2010, as compared with 2009, mainly due to lower investment income related to our non-qualified deferred compensation plan this year (approximately $0.9 million) and foreign currency transaction gains incurred in 2009 that did not repeat in 2010.

        The increase in the effective income tax rate in fiscal 2010, as compared with 2009, was mainly due to the non-deductibility of a portion of the Delta acquisition expenses incurred in 2010. Our cash flows provided by operations were approximately $152.2 million in 2010, as compared with $349.5 million in 2009. Lower net earnings in 2010, as compared with 2009, and the significant decrease in inventories in 2009 were the main reasons for the lower operating cash flow in 2010.

Engineered Infrastructure Products (EIP) segment

        The increase in net sales in fiscal 2010, as compared with 2009, was mainly due the acquisition of Delta's engineered access systems, poles and highway safety products (approximately $136.2 million), offset to a degree by to lower sales volumes and lower sales prices in the lighting and communication structures product lines. In the Lighting Traffic and Roadway Safety product line, we experienced lower sales and average unit selling prices in North American and international markets in 2010, as compared with 2009 (approximately $40 million). The decrease in North American sales in 2010, as compared with 2009, was due to weaker customer demand for lighting and traffic poles in the transportation market channel. Sales unit volumes in North America in 2010 were slightly lower as compared with 2009. We believe sales demand in the transportation market was dampened by the lack of a long-term federal highway funding legislation and state budget deficits, as the lack of long-term funding legislation does not give the various states ample visibility to implement long-term initiatives. Furthermore, highway spending sponsored under the federal program requires the various states to provide part of required funding. Many states are in budget deficits, which may constrain their ability to access federal matching funds to implement roadway projects. While commercial lighting market sales in 2010 were slightly higher as compared with 2009, demand remains relatively weak, due to continued softness in the commercial and residential construction markets. In Europe, sales were lower in 2010, as compared with 2009. As most economies in Europe are weak, governments have cut spending (including for infrastructure projects) to cope with budgetary deficits. The decrease in European lighting sales in 2010, as compared with 2009, was also related to competitive selling price pressures and certain project sales in developing markets in 2009 that did not repeat in 2010. Lighting structure sales in China, while a relatively small portion of global lighting sales, improved in 2010, as compared with 2009, due to increased sales efforts.

34

---

Table of Contents

        Sales in the communication structures product line were lower in fiscal 2010, as compared with 2009, in both North America and China. In North America, general slowness in the wireless communication structures market and lower sign structure sales resulted in lower 2010 sales, as compared with 2009. In China, sales of wireless communication structures likewise were lower in 2010, as compared with 2009. In 2010, annual supply contracts with the various carriers were settled later than in the past and we believe there is some continuing coordination of the wireless networks in China that is impacting network development at this time.

        Operating income in the EIP segment was higher in fiscal 2010, as compared with 2009, due the impact of the Delta infrastructure businesses (approximately $17.6 million), offset somewhat by lower lighting and wireless communication sales volumes and pricing pressures due to weak market conditions. The impact of lower sales on operating profit was mitigated to an extent by factory operational improvements (approximately $12.0 million). While LIFO expense for the segment was higher in fiscal 2010, as compared with 2009, by approximately $9.6 million, this impact was largely offset by lower average material costs incurred in 2010, as compared with 2009. Aside from the impact of the Delta acquisition, SG&A expenses were approximately $5.3 million lower in 2010, as compared with 2009, due to various cost containment actions in the segment this year.

Utility Support Structures (Utility) segment

        In the Utility segment, the sales decrease in 2010, as compared with 2009, was due to the combination of lower sales unit volumes in the U.S. and lower average unit selling prices. The decrease in unit sales (in tons) in fiscal 2010 in the U.S. was approximately 24%, and sales prices were down approximately $94 million from 2009. The record sales performance realized in 2009 was in part related to the large backlog at the end of the 2008 fiscal year, which was the result of substantial order intake in the last half of 2008. At the end of fiscal 2009, our sales order backlog was less than half of the year-end 2008 backlog. During 2009 and continuing into 2010, the economic recession in the U.S. resulted in a drop in electricity demand. Accordingly, our customers reduced their purchases of structures and delayed scheduled projects. In addition, price competition became more significant, especially in light of falling steel prices throughout most of 2009 and generally lower levels of transmission and substation spending this year by utility companies. We believe that utility companies invested at lower levels due to a combination of some falling electricity consumption in the U.S. during the recession and uncertainty that they would generate an adequate financial return on transmission and substation investments. In international markets, sales improved over 2009, the result of increased project sales into new markets, offset by lower sales volumes in China.

        The decrease in operating income in 2010, as compared with 2009, was a result of lower sales volumes, lower average selling prices and an unfavorable sales mix. Operating profit also was negatively impacted by $4.0 million in increased LIFO expense in 2010, as compared with 2009. The decrease in SG&A expenses in 2010, as compared with 2009, primarily resulted from lower employee incentives related to the decrease in operating income in 2010 (approximately $5.9 million) and lower sales commission expense (approximately $4.0 million) due to the decrease in net sales in 2010.

Coatings segment

        Net sales in the Coatings segment increased in fiscal 2010, as compared with 2009, resulted mainly from the inclusion of Delta's galvanizing sales in this segment (approximately $106.9 million) and improved sales unit volumes. Galvanizing unit volumes in 2010 were approximately 6% higher in 2010 as compared with in 2009. We attribute the increase in sales demand to slightly stronger industrial economic conditions in our geographic market areas.

        The increase in segment operating income in 2010, as compared with 2009, was due to the impact of Delta's galvanizing operations (approximately $13.6 million) and improved sales volumes and the

35

---

Table of Contents

associated operating leverage. These effects were offset somewhat by rising zinc costs that were not recovered through sales price increases. Increases in the average cost of zinc in 2010, as compared with 2009, amounted to approximately $3.6 million. These cost increases were largely offset by factory efficiencies and increased sales volume. SG&A expenses for the segment in 2010 were higher as compared with 2009, mainly due to the impact of Delta's galvanizing operations.

Irrigation segment

        Irrigation segment net sales in 2010 improved, as compared with 2009, due to stronger sales volumes in North America and International markets and currency translation effects on international sales (approximately $7.0 million). In North America, we believe improved demand for irrigation equipment in 2010 over a weak 2009 resulted from improvement in grower sentiment and expected net farm income. In international markets, the sales improvement in 2010 over 2009 was broad-based, as stronger market conditions drove higher sales in most regions.

        Operating income for the segment improved in 2010 over 2009, due to improved sales unit volumes in North America, lower raw material prices (net of increased LIFO expense of $6.8 million) and a stronger international sales mix. SG&A expenses increased mainly due to increased employee incentives associated with improved operating income (approximately $5.2 million) and costs associated with business development activities.

Other

        This unit mainly includes our tubing and industrial and fasteners operations and the Delta grinding media and manganese dioxide operations. The increase in sales and operating income in 2010, as compared with 2009, primarily was due to the Delta businesses acquired (approximately $110.3 million and $10.5 million, respectively) and improved sales demand for tubing products.

Net corporate expense

        Net corporate expense increased in 2010, as compared with 2009, as 2010 expenses included:

•

expenses associated with the acquisition of Delta (approximately $15.3 million);



•

administrative expenses associated with Delta of $12.7 million (including approximately $5.9 million of pension plan expenses).

These expense increases were offset somewhat by lower employee incentive accruals in 2010 of $11.6 million and other decreases in discretionary spending.

LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES

Cash Flows

        Working Capital and Operating Cash Flows—Net working capital was $844.9 million at December 31, 2011, as compared with $747.3 million at December 25, 2010. The increase in net working capital in 2011 mainly resulted from increased inventories to support the increase in sales, especially in the Irrigation and Utility segments. Operating cash flow was $149.7 million in fiscal 2011, as compared with $152.2 million in fiscal 2010. The decrease in operating cash flow in 2011 mainly was the result of the increase in working capital as compared with 2010, the tax non-cash tax benefits recorded as a reduction of income tax expense ($65.7 million) and the annual contribution we made to the Delta Pension Plan of $11.9 million in fiscal 2011. In fiscal 2010, this contribution was made before we acquired Delta.

        Investing Cash Flows—Capital spending in the fiscal 2011 was $83.1 million, as compared with $36.1 million in 2010. The most significant capital spending projects in 2011 included our new plant in

36

---

Table of Contents

India ($10.8 million), certain capacity expansions in the Utility segment ($10.0 million) and our Australian galvanizing operations ($10.8 million), including $4.4.million to acquire previously leased real property. We expect our capital spending for the 2012 fiscal year to be approximately $75 million. Investing cash flows for fiscal 2010 included $436.7 million of cash (less $198.8 million of cash acquired) for the Delta acquisition and an aggregate of $7.5 million associated with increasing our ownership interest in West Coast Engineering, Ltd. from 70% to 80% and the additional purchase price paid to the former shareholders of Stainton related to the performance of the operation after its acquisition in November 2008.

        Financing Cash Flows—Our total interest-bearing debt increased slightly from $477.7 million at December 25, 2010 to $486.1 million as of December 31, 2011. In the second quarter of fiscal 2011, we redeemed all of our $150 million of senior subordinated notes that were due in May 2014 with the proceeds from the sale of $150 million principal amount of senior unsecured notes. The senior unsecured notes became part of a series of senior unsecured notes previously issued in April 2010. The senior unsecured notes were issued at a premium of $14.8 million in excess of the principal amount. We refinanced the senior subordinated notes to take advantage of a favorable interest-rate environment and to extend our long-term debt maturities. Financing cash flows in 2011 included approximately $25.3 million to acquire the remaining 40% of the shares of Donhad Pty. Ltd. (a manufacturer of steel grinding media serving the Australian mining industry).

Sources of Financing and Capital

        We have historically funded our growth, capital spending and acquisitions through a combination of operating cash flows and debt financing. We have an internal long-term objective to maintain long-term debt as a percent of invested capital at or below 40%. At December 31, 2011, our long-term debt to invested capital ratio was 26.8%, as compared with 29.7% at December 25, 2010. Subject to our level of acquisition activity and steel industry operating conditions (which could affect the levels of inventory we need to fulfill customer commitments), we plan to maintain this ratio below 40% in 2012.

        Our debt financing at December 31, 2011 consisted primarily of long-term debt. We also maintain certain short-term bank lines of credit totaling $51.9 million, $46.8 million of which was unused at December 31, 2011. Our long-term debt principally consists of:

•

$450 million face value ($464 million carrying value) of senior unsecured notes that bear interest at 6.625% per annum and are due in April 2020. $300 million face value of notes were issued in April 2010 and $150 million face value ($164.8 million of total proceeds) of the notes were issued in June 2011. We are allowed to repurchase the notes at specified prepayment premiums. These notes are guaranteed by certain of our subsidiaries.



•

$280 million revolving credit agreement with a group of banks. We may increase the credit facility by up to an additional $100 million at any time, subject to participating banks increasing the amount of their lending commitments. The interest rate on our borrowings will be, at our option, either:



(a)

LIBOR (based on a 1, 2, 3 or 6 month interest period, as selected by us) plus 125 to 200 basis points (inclusive of facility fees), depending on our ratio of debt to earnings before taxes, interest, depreciation and amortization (EBITDA), or;



(b)

the higher of

The higher of (a) the prime lending rate and (b) the Federal Funds rate plus 50 basis points plus in each case, 25 to 100 basis points (inclusive of facility fees), depending on our ratio of debt to EBITDA, or

37

---

Table of Contents

LIBOR (based on a 1 week interest period) plus 125 to 200 basis points (inclusive of facility fees), depending on our ratio of debt to EBITDA

        At December 31, 2011, we had no outstanding borrowings under the revolving credit agreement. The revolving credit agreement has a termination date of October 16, 2013 and contains certain financial covenants that may limit our additional borrowing capability under the agreement. At December 31, 2011, we had the ability to borrow an additional $260.9 million under this facility.

        These debt agreements contain covenants that require us to maintain certain coverage ratios and may limit us with respect to certain business activities, including capital expenditures. Our key debt covenants are as follows:

•

Interest-bearing debt is not to exceed 3.75x EBITDA of the prior four quarters;



•

Senior interest-bearing debt is not to exceed 2.50x EBITDA over the prior four quarters; and,



•

Our EBITDA over our prior four quarters must be at least 2.50x our interest expense over the same period.

        At December 31, 2011, we were in compliance with all covenants related to these debt agreements. The key covenant calculations at December 31, 2011 were as follows:

        Our businesses are cyclical, but we have diversity in our markets, from a product, customer and a geographical standpoint. We have demonstrated the ability to effectively manage through business cycles and maintain liquidity. We have consistently generated operating cash flows in excess of our capital expenditures. Based on our available credit facilities, recent issuance of senior unsecured notes and our history of positive operational cash flows, we believe that we have adequate liquidity to meet our needs.

        We have not made any provision for U.S. income taxes in our financial statements on approximately $519 million of undistributed earnings of our foreign subsidiaries, as we intend to reinvest those earnings. Of our cash balances at December 31, 2011, $323.6 million is held in entities outside the United States. If we need to repatriate foreign cash balances to the United States to meet our cash needs, income taxes would be paid to the extent that those cash repatriations were undistributed earnings of our foreign subsidiaries. The income taxes that we would pay if cash were repatriated depends on the amounts to be repatriated and from which country. If all of our cash outside the United States were to be repatriated to the United States, we estimate that we would pay approximately $39.5 million in income taxes to repatriate that cash.

38

---

Table of Contents

FINANCIAL OBLIGATIONS AND FINANCIAL COMMITMENTS

        We have future financial obligations related to (1) payment of principal and interest on interest-bearing debt, (2) Delta pension plan contributions, (3) operating leases and (4) purchase obligations. These obligations at December 31, 2011 were as follows (in millions of dollars):

        Long-term debt mainly consisted of $450.0 million principal amount of senior unsecured notes. At December 31, 2011, we had no outstanding borrowings under our bank revolving credit agreement. We also had various other borrowing arrangements aggregating $10.5 million at December 31, 2011. Obligations under these agreements may accelerate in event of non-compliance with covenants. The Delta pension plan contributions are related to agreed-upon cash funding commitments to the plan with the plan's trustees, which are re-negotiated in conjunction with a triennial valuation. Operating leases relate mainly to various production and office facilities and are in the normal course of business.

        Unconditional purchase obligations relate to purchase orders for zinc, aluminum and steel, all of which we plan to use in 2012, and certain capital investments planned for 2012. We believe the quantities under contract are reasonable in light of normal fluctuations in business levels and we expect to use the commodities under contract during the contract period.

        At December 31, 2011, we had approximately $45.0 million of various long-term liabilities related to certain income tax, environmental and other matters. These items are not scheduled above because we are unable to make a reasonably reliable estimate as to the timing of any potential payments.

OFF BALANCE SHEET ARRANGEMENTS

        We have operating lease obligations to unaffiliated parties on leases of certain production and office facilities and equipment. These leases are in the normal course of business and generally contain no substantial obligations for us at the end of the lease contracts. We also have certain commercial commitments related to contingent events that could create a financial obligation for us. Our commitments at December 31, 2011 were as follows (in millions of dollars):

        The above commitment is a loan guarantee of a non-consolidated subsidiary in Argentina that is accompanied by a guarantee from the majority owner to us. We also maintain standby letters of credit for contract performance on certain sales contracts.

MARKET RISK

Changes in Prices

        Certain key materials we use are commodities traded in worldwide markets and are subject to fluctuations in price. The most significant materials are steel, aluminum, zinc and natural gas. Over the

39

---

Table of Contents

last several years, prices for these commodities have been volatile. The volatility in these prices was due to such factors as fluctuations in supply and demand conditions, government tariffs and the costs of steel-making inputs. We have also experienced volatility in natural gas prices in the past several years. Our main strategies in managing these risks are a combination of fixed price purchase contracts with our vendors to reduce the volatility in our purchase prices and sales price increases where possible. We use natural gas swap contracts on a limited basis to mitigate the impact of rising gas prices on our operating income.

Risk Management

        Market Risk—The principal market risks affecting us are exposure to interest rates, foreign currency exchange rates and natural gas. We normally do not use derivative financial instruments to hedge these exposures (except as described below), nor do we use derivatives for trading purposes.

        Interest Rates—Our interest-bearing debt at December 31, 2011 was mostly fixed rate debt. Our notes payable and a small portion of our long-term debt accrue interest at a variable rate. Assuming average interest rates and borrowings on variable rate debt, a hypothetical 10% change in interest rates would have affected our interest expense in 2011 and 2010 by approximately $0.1 million and $0.1 million, respectively. Likewise, we have excess cash balances on deposit in interest-bearing accounts in financial institutions. An increase or decrease in interest rates of ten basis points would have impacted our annual interest earnings in 2011 by approximately $0.3 million.

        Foreign Exchange—Exposures to transactions denominated in a currency other than the entity's functional currency are not material, and therefore the potential exchange losses in future earnings, fair value and cash flows from these transactions are not material. From time to time, as market conditions indicate, we will enter into foreign currency contracts to manage the risks associated with anticipated future transactions and current balance sheet positions that are in currencies other than the functional currencies of our operations. At December 31, 2011, there were no significant open foreign currency contracts. Much of our cash in non-U.S. entities is denominated in foreign currencies, where fluctuations in exchange rates will impact our cash balances in U.S. dollar terms. A hypothetical 10% change in the value of the U.S. dollar would impact our reported cash balance by approximately $34.0 million in 2011 and $31.0 million in 2010.

        We manage our investment risk in foreign operations by borrowing in the functional currencies of the foreign entities where appropriate. The following table indicates the change in the recorded value of our most significant investments at year-end assuming a hypothetical 10% change in the value of the U.S. Dollar.

        Commodity risk—Natural gas is a significant commodity used in our factories, especially in our Coatings segment galvanizing operations, where natural gas is used to heat tanks that enable the hot-dipped galvanizing process. Natural gas prices are volatile and we mitigate some of this volatility through the use of derivative commodity instruments. Our current policy is to manage this commodity price risk for 0-50% of our U.S. natural gas requirements for the upcoming 6-12 months through the purchase of natural gas swaps based on NYMEX futures prices for delivery in the month being hedged. The objective of this policy is to mitigate the impact on our earnings of sudden, significant increases in the price of natural gas. At December 31, 2011, we had no open natural gas contracts.

40

---

Table of Contents

CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES

        The following accounting policies involve judgments and estimates used in preparation of the consolidated financial statements. There is a substantial amount of management judgment used in preparing financial statements. We must make estimates on a number of items, such as provisions for bad debts, warranties, contingencies, impairments of long-lived assets, and inventory obsolescence. We base our estimates on our experience and on other assumptions that we believe are reasonable under the circumstances. Further, we re-evaluate our estimates from time to time and as circumstances change. Actual results may differ under different assumptions or conditions. The selection and application of our critical accounting policies are discussed annually with our audit committee.

Allowance for Doubtful Accounts

        In determining an allowance for accounts receivable that will not ultimately be collected in full, we consider:

•

age of the accounts receivable



•

customer credit history



•

customer financial information



•

reasons for non-payment (product, service or billing issues).

        If our customer's financial condition was to deteriorate, resulting in an impaired ability to make payment, additional allowances may be required.

Warranties

        All of our businesses must meet certain product quality and performance criteria. We rely on historical product claims data to estimate the cost of product warranties at the time revenue is recognized. In determining the accrual for the estimated cost of warranty claims, we consider our experience with:

•

costs to correct the product problem in the field, including labor costs



•

costs for replacement parts



•

other direct costs associated with warranty claims



•

the number of product units subject to warranty claims

        In addition to known claims or warranty issues, we estimate future claims on recent sales. The key assumptions in our estimates are the rates we apply to those recent sales (which is based on historical claims experience) and our expected future warranty costs for products that are covered under warranty for an extended period of time. Our provision for various product warranties was approximately $13.6 million at December 31, 2011. If our estimate changed by 50%, the impact on operating income would be approximately $6.8 million. If our cost to repair a product or the number of products subject to warranty claims is greater than we estimated, then we would have to increase our accrued cost for warranty claims.

Inventories

        We use the last-in first-out (LIFO) method to determine the value approximately 40% of our inventory. The remaining 60% of our inventory is valued on a first-in first-out (FIFO) basis. In periods of rising costs to produce inventory, the LIFO method will result in lower profits than FIFO, because higher more recent costs are recorded to cost of goods sold than under the FIFO method. Conversely,

41

---

Table of Contents

in periods of falling costs to produce inventory, the LIFO method will result in higher profits than the FIFO method.

        In 2011 and 2010, we experienced higher costs to produce inventory than in the prior respective years, due mainly to higher cost for steel and steel-related products. This resulted in higher cost of goods sold (and lower operating income) in 2011 and 2010 of approximately $7.0 million and $3.0 million, respectively, than had our entire inventory been valued on the FIFO method. In 2009, prices decreased and operating income would have decreased by approximately $18.6 million than had our entire inventory been valued on the FIFO method.

        We write down slow-moving and obsolete inventory by the difference between the value of the inventory and our estimate of the reduced value based on potential future uses, the likelihood that overstocked inventory will be sold and the expected selling prices of the inventory. If our ability to realize value on slow-moving or obsolete inventory is less favorable than assumed, additional inventory write downs may be required.

Depreciation, Amortization and Impairment of Long-Lived Assets

        Our long-lived assets consist primarily of property, plant and equipment, goodwill and intangible assets acquired in business acquisitions. We have assigned useful lives to our property, plant and equipment and certain intangible assets ranging from 3 to 40 years.

        We identified eleven reporting units for purposes of evaluating goodwill and we annually evaluate our reporting units for goodwill impairment during the third fiscal quarter, which usually coincides with our strategic planning process. We assess the value of our reporting units using after-tax cash flows from operations (less capital expenses) discounted to present value and as a multiple of earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization (EBITDA). The key assumptions in the discounted cash flow analysis are the discount rate and the projected cash flows. We also use sensitivity analysis to determine the impact of changes in discount rates and cash flow forecasts on the valuation of the reporting units. As allowed for under current accounting standards, we rely on our previous valuations for the annual impairment testing provided that the following criteria for each reporting unit are met: (1) the assets and liabilities that make up the reporting unit have not changed significantly since the most recent fair value determination and (2) the most recent fair value determination resulted in an amount that exceeded the carrying amount of the reporting unit by a substantial margin.

        The valuation of our reporting units exceeded their respective carrying values by a substantial margin, except the Webforge reporting unit in the Engineered Infrastructure Products segment, which has goodwill of $64.5 million and an excess of fair value over carrying value of $3.1 million. Accordingly, no further valuation of our reporting units was necessary. If our assumptions on discount rates and future cash flows change as a result of events or circumstances, and we believe these assets may have declined in value, then we may record impairment charges, resulting in lower profits. In the event the discount rate increased by 50 basis points, we would have to further evaluate the Webforge reporting unit for possible impairment. Our reporting units are all cyclical and their sales and profitability may fluctuate from year to year. In the evaluation of our reporting units, we look at the long-term prospects for the reporting unit and recognize that current performance may not be the best indicator of future prospects or value, which requires management judgment.

        Our indefinite-lived intangible assets consist of trade names. We assess the values of these assets apart from goodwill as part of the annual impairment testing. We use the relief-from-royalty method to evaluate our trade names, under which the value of a trade name is determined based on a royalty that could be charged to a third party for using the trade name in question. The royalty, which is based on a reasonable rate applied against estimated future sales, is tax-effected and discounted to present value. The most significant assumptions in this evaluation include estimated future sales, the royalty rate and the after-tax discount rate. For our evaluation purposes, the royalty rates used vary between 0.5% and

42

---

Table of Contents

1.5% of sales and the after-tax discount rate of 13.1%, which we estimate to be the after-tax cost of capital for such assets. In 2009, impairment charges of $0.7 million were recorded in connection with our decision to discontinue the use of a trade name for sign structures. In the fourth quarter of 2011, we completed our evaluation of the PiRod and Industrial Galvanizers of America trade names, by reviewing the valuation assumptions and future business plans associated with the trade name and concluded that the value of the trade names were to be written down by approximately $3.8 million.

Income Taxes

        We record valuation allowances to reduce our deferred tax assets to amounts that are more likely than not to be realized. We consider future taxable income expectations and tax-planning strategies in assessing the need for the valuation allowance. If we estimate a deferred tax asset is not likely to be fully realized in the future, a valuation allowance to decrease the amount of the deferred tax asset would decrease net earnings in the period the determination was made. Likewise, if we subsequently determine that we are able to realize all or part of a net deferred tax asset in the future, an adjustment reducing the valuation allowance would increase net earnings in the period such determination was made.

        At December 31, 2011, we had approximately $183.2 million in deferred tax assets relating mainly to operating loss and tax credit carryforwards, with a valuation allowance of $123.5 million. In 2011, the valuation allowances decreased significantly. This was due to the execution of a legal entity restructuring within the Delta group which allowed for release of a portion of valuation allowances previously established. At December 25, 2010, Delta had $173.2 million of deferred tax assets relating mainly to operating losses and $31.3 million of deferred tax assets associated with its defined benefit pension liability. Because these tax losses were generated in the U.K. and Delta had no operations or future income taxable in the U.K., Delta historically did not establish a value on its financial statements for these deferred tax assets. Likewise, we concluded that the realization of these deferred tax assets was not more likely than not. Accordingly, we established a valuation allowance on these deferred tax assets of $204.5 million at fiscal year-end 2010. In 2011, we formulated and executed a restructuring plan that resulted in us being more likely than not to be able to use some of these deferred tax assets. Accordingly, we removed approximately $65.7 million of valuation allowances on certain operating loss carryforwards in our Delta UK entities, with a corresponding decrease in income tax expense.

        At December 31, 2011, $118.3 million in valuation allowances remain in these entities related to capital loss carryforwards, which are unlikely ever to be realized. Excluding the valuation allowances related to Delta, Valmont had an increase of $1.5 million in valuation allowances that increased our income tax expense during 2011. In 2009, we reduced our valuation allowances by net $4.1 million, resulting in a decrease in our income tax expense of approximately $1.5 million. This changes occurred because we determined that, based on facts and circumstances, the realization of these deferred tax assets was more likely than not. In 2009, the most significant decrease in our valuation allowances that affected our income tax expense related to the realization of operating loss carryforwards due to the strong performance of our Mexican utility support structures operation. If circumstances related to our deferred tax assets change in the future, we may be required to increase or decrease the valuation allowance on these assets, resulting in an increase or decrease in income tax expense and a reduction or increase in net income.

        During 2011 we recorded $1.6 million in income tax expense on $24.0 million of undistributed earnings of foreign subsidiaries which we determined are not permanently invested. Foreign subsidiaries not considered permanently invested had total cash of $7.0 million at December 31, 2011. We have not made any U.S. income tax provision in our financial statements for $518.9 million of undistributed earnings of our foreign subsidiaries, as we intend to reinvest those earnings. Foreign subsidiaries considered permanently invested had total cash of $300.2 million at December 31, 2011. If circumstances change and we determine that we are not permanently invested, we would need to

43

---

Table of Contents

record an income tax expense on our financial statements for the resulting income tax that would be paid upon repatriation. The amount of that income tax would depend on how much of those earnings were repatriated but could range from a low of $39.5 million to a high of $107.5 million.

        We are subject to examination by taxing authorities in the various countries in which we operate. The tax years subject to examination vary by jurisdiction. We regularly consider the likelihood of additional income tax assessments in each of these taxing jurisdictions based on our experiences related to prior audits and our understanding of the facts and circumstances of the related tax issues. We include in current income tax expense any changes to accruals for potential tax deficiencies. If our judgments related to tax deficiencies differ from our actual experience, our income tax expense could increase or decrease in a given fiscal period.

Pension Benefits

        Delta Ltd. maintains a defined benefit pension plan for qualifying employees in the United Kingdom. Independent actuaries assist in properly measuring the liabilities and expenses associated with accounting for pension benefits to eligible employees. In order to use actuarial methods to value the liabilities and expenses, we must make several assumptions. The critical assumptions used to measure pension obligations and expenses are the discount rate and expected rate of return on pension assets.

        We evaluate our critical assumptions at least annually. Key assumptions are based on the following factors:

•

Discount rate is based on an annualized yield on the iBoxx over 15-year AA-rated bond index.



•

Expected return on plan assets is based on our asset allocation mix and our historical return, taking into consideration current and expected market conditions. Most of the assets in the pension plan are invested in corporate bonds, the expected return of which are estimated based on risk-free bonds ("gilts" in the U.K.), plus a risk premium of 75 to 125 basis points. The long-term expected returns on equities are based on historic performance over the long-term.



•

Inflation is based on the estimated change in the consumer price index ("CPI") or the retail price index ("RPI"), depending on the relevant plan provisions.

        The following tables present the key assumptions used to measure pension expense for 2012 and the estimated impact on 2012 pension expense relative to a change in those assumptions:

 

ITEM 7A.    QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK.

        The information required is included under the captioned paragraph, "Risk Management" on page 40 of this report.

44

---

Table of Contents

ITEM 8.    FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA.

        The following consolidated financial statements of the Company and its subsidiaries are included herein as listed below:

45

---

Table of Contents

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

To the Board of Directors and Shareholders of
Valmont Industries, Inc.
Omaha, Nebraska

        We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Valmont Industries, Inc. and subsidiaries (the "Company") as of December 31, 2011 and December 25, 2010, and the related consolidated statements of earnings, comprehensive income, shareholders' equity, and cash flows for each of the three fiscal years in the period ended December 31, 2011. Our audits also included the financial statement schedule listed in the Index at Item 15. These financial statements and financial statement schedule are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the financial statements and financial statement schedule based on our audits.

        We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

        In our opinion, such consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Valmont Industries, Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2011 and December 25, 2010, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the three fiscal years in the period ended December 31, 2011, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Also, in our opinion, such financial statement schedule, when considered in relation to the basic consolidated financial statements taken as a whole, presents fairly, in all material respects, the information set forth therein.

        The Company has changed its method of presenting comprehensive income in 2011 due to the adoption of FASB Accounting Standards Update No. 2011-05, Presentation of Comprehensive Income. The change in presentation has been applied retrospectively to all periods presented.

        We have also audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the Company's internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2011, based on the criteria established in Internal Control—Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission and our report dated February 28, 2012 expressed an unqualified opinion on the Company's internal control over financial reporting.

/s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
Omaha, Nebraska
February 28, 2012

46

---

Table of Contents

Valmont Industries, Inc. and Subsidiaries

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF EARNINGS

Three-year period ended December 31, 2011

(Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)

   

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

47

---

Table of Contents

Valmont Industries, Inc. and Subsidiaries

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME

Three-year period ended December 31, 2011

(Dollars in thousands)

   

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

48

---

Table of Contents

Valmont Industries, Inc. and Subsidiaries

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

December 31, 2011 and December 25, 2010

(Dollars in thousands, except shares and per share amounts)

   

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

49

---

Table of Contents

Valmont Industries, Inc. and Subsidiaries

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

Three-year period ended December 31, 2011

(Dollars in thousands)

   

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

50

---

Table of Contents

Valmont Industries, Inc. and Subsidiaries

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY

Three-year period ended December 31, 2011

(Dollars in thousands, except shares and per share amounts)

   

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

51

---

Table of Contents

Valmont Industries, Inc. and Subsidiaries

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Three-year period ended December 31, 2011

(Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)

(1) SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

Principles of Consolidation

        The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Valmont Industries, Inc. and its wholly and majority-owned subsidiaries (the Company). Investments in 20% to 50% owned affiliates are accounted for by the equity method and investments in less than 20% owned affiliates are accounted for by the cost method. All significant intercompany items have been eliminated.

Cash overdrafts

        Cash book overdrafts totaling $21,214 and $11,952 were classified as accounts payable at December 31, 2011 and December 25, 2010, respectively. The Company's policy is to report the change in book overdrafts as an operating activity in the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows.

Operating Segments

        The Company aggregates its operating segments into four reportable segments. Aggregation is based on similarity of operating segments as to economic characteristics, products, production processes, types or classes of customer and the methods of distribution. Reportable segments are as follows:

        ENGINEERED INFRASTRUCTURE PRODUCTS: This segment consists of the manufacture of engineered metal structures and components for the global lighting and traffic, wireless communication, roadway safety and access systems applications;

        UTILITY SUPPORT STRUCTURES: This segment consists of the manufacture of engineered steel and concrete structures for the global utility industry;

        COATINGS: This segment consists of galvanizing, anodizing and powder coating services on a global basis; and

        IRRIGATION: This segment consists of the manufacture of agricultural irrigation equipment and related parts and services for the global agricultural industry.

        In addition to these four reportable segments, there are other businesses and activities that individually are not more than 10% of consolidated sales. These operations include the manufacture of forged steel grinding media for the mining industry, tubular products for industrial customers, electrolytic manganese dioxide for disposable batteries and the distribution of industrial fasteners. These operations collectively are reported in the "Other" category.

Fiscal Year

        The Company operates on a 52 or 53 week fiscal year with each year ending on the last Saturday in December. Accordingly, the Company's fiscal year ended December 31, 2011 consisted of 53 weeks. The Company's fiscal years ended December 25, 2010 and December 26, 2009 consisted of 52 weeks. The estimated impact on the company's results of operations due to the extra week in fiscal 2011 was additional net sales of approximately $50,000 and additional net earnings of approximately $3,000.

52

---

Table of Contents

Valmont Industries, Inc. and Subsidiaries

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

Three-year period ended December 31, 2011

(Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)

(1) SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Continued)

Accounts Receivable

        Accounts receivable are reported on the balance sheet net of any allowance for doubtful accounts. Allowances are maintained in amounts considered to be appropriate in relation to the outstanding receivables based on age of the receivable, economic conditions and customer credit quality.

Inventories

        Approximately 40% and 32% of inventory is valued at the lower of cost, determined on the last-in, first-out (LIFO) method, or market as of December 31, 2011 and December 25, 2010, respectively. All other inventory is valued at the lower of cost, determined on the first-in, first-out (FIFO) method or market. Finished goods and manufactured goods inventories include the costs of acquired raw materials and related factory labor and overhead charges required to convert raw materials to manufactured and finished goods. The excess of replacement cost of inventories over the LIFO value is approximately $49,536 and $42,559 at December 31, 2011 and December 25, 2010, respectively.

Long-Lived Assets

        Property, plant and equipment are recorded at historical cost. The Company generally uses the straight-line method in computing depreciation and amortization for financial reporting purposes and accelerated methods for income tax purposes. The annual provisions for depreciation and amortization have been computed principally in accordance with the following ranges of asset lives: buildings and improvements 15 to 40 years, machinery and equipment 3 to 12 years, transportation equipment 3 to 24 years, office furniture and equipment 3 to 7 years and intangible assets 5 to 20 years.

        An impairment loss is recognized if the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable and exceeds estimated future undiscounted cash flows of the asset. A recognized impairment loss reduces the carrying amount of the asset to its fair value.

        The Company evaluates its reporting units for impairment of goodwill during the third fiscal quarter of each year. Reporting units are evaluated using after-tax operating cash flows (less capital expenditures) discounted to present value. Indefinite-lived intangible assets are assessed separately from goodwill as part of the annual impairment testing, using a relief-from-royalty method. If the underlying assumptions related to the valuation of a reporting unit's goodwill or an indefinite-lived intangible asset change materially before the annual impairment testing, the reporting unit or asset is evaluated for potential impairment. In these evaluations, management considers not only recent operating performance, expected future performance, industry conditions and other indicators of potential impairment. In fiscal 2011, upon evaluation of future uses of its trade names, the Company recorded impairment in the aggregate of $3,779 in selling, general and administrative expenses.

Income Taxes

        The Company uses the asset and liability method to calculate deferred income taxes. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized on temporary differences between financial statement and tax bases

53

---

Table of Contents

Valmont Industries, Inc. and Subsidiaries

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

Three-year period ended December 31, 2011

(Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)

(1) SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Continued)

of assets and liabilities using enacted tax rates. The effect of tax rate changes on deferred tax assets and liabilities is recognized in income during the period that includes the enactment date.

Warranties

        The Company's provision for product warranty reflects management's best estimate of probable liability under its product warranties. Estimated future warranty costs are recorded at the time a sale is recognized. Future warranty liability is determined based on applying historical claim rate experience to units sold that are still within the warranty period. In addition, the Company records provisions for known warranty claims.

Pension Benefits

        Certain expenses are incurred in connection with a defined benefit pension plan. In order to measure expense and the related benefit obligation, various assumptions are made including discount rates used to value the obligation, expected return on plan assets used to fund these expenses and estimated future inflation rates. These assumptions are based on historical experience as well as current facts and circumstances. An actuarial analysis is used to measure the expense and liability associated with pension benefits.

Derivative Instrument

        In connection with the issuance of the $150,000 principal amount of senior notes in June 2011, the Company executed a contract to lock in the treasury rate. The contract, for a notional amount of $130,000, was executed to hedge the risk of potential fluctuations in the treasury rates which would change the amount of net proceeds received from the debt offering. As the benchmark rate component of the fixed rate debt issuance and the cash flow hedged risk is based on that same benchmark, this was deemed an effective hedge at inception. On June 8, 2011, this contract was settled with the Company paying approximately $3,568 to the counterparty. As such, the Company recorded the $3,568 in accumulated other comprehensive income and will amortize this loss to interest expense as interest payments are made over the term of the debt.

Comprehensive Income

        Comprehensive income includes net income, currency translation adjustments, certain derivative-related activity and changes in net actuarial gains/losses from a pension plan. Results of operations for foreign subsidiaries are translated using the average exchange rates during the period. Assets and

54

---

Table of Contents

Valmont Industries, Inc. and Subsidiaries

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

Three-year period ended December 31, 2011

(Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)

(1) SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Continued)

liabilities are translated at the exchange rates in effect on the balance sheet dates. Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) consisted of the following at December 31, 2011 and December 25, 2010:

Revenue Recognition

        Revenue is recognized upon shipment of the product or delivery of the service to the customer, which coincides with passage of title and risk of loss to the customer. Customer acceptance provisions exist only in the design stage of our products. Acceptance of the design by the customer is required before the product is manufactured and delivered to the customer. We are not entitled to any compensation solely based on design of the product and we do not recognize any revenue associated with the design stage. No general rights of return exist for customers once the product has been delivered. Shipping and handling costs associated with sales are recorded as cost of goods sold. Sales discounts and rebates are estimated based on past experience and are recorded as a reduction of net sales in the period in which the sale is recognized.

        Service revenues predominantly consist of coatings services provided by our Coatings segment to its customers.

Use of Estimates

        Management of the Company has made a number of estimates and assumptions relating to the reporting of assets and liabilities and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities to prepare these financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

Equity Method Investments

        The Company has equity method investments in non-consolidated subsidiaries which are recorded within other assets. In fiscal 2010, the Company received dividends of $10,125 from non-consolidated subsidiaries, which reduced the investments in these non-consolidated subsidiaries.

Treasury Stock

        Repurchased shares are recorded as "Treasury Stock" and result in a reduction of "Shareholders' Equity." When treasury shares are reissued, the Company uses the last-in, first-out method, and the difference between the repurchase cost and reissuance price is charged or credited to "Additional Paid-In Capital."

55

---

Table of Contents

Valmont Industries, Inc. and Subsidiaries

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

Three-year period ended December 31, 2011

(Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)

(1) SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Continued)

Research and Development

        Research and development costs are charged to operations in the year incurred. These costs are a component of "Selling, general and administrative expenses" on the Consolidated Statements of Earnings. Research and development expenses were approximately $6,200 in 2011, $5,500 in 2010, and $6,200 in 2009.

Subsequent Events

        The Company has evaluated all subsequent events requiring recognition as of December 31, 2011 and did not identify any subsequent events that require disclosure.

Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements

        In September 2011, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2011- 08, Testing Goodwill for Impairment, permitting an entity to first assess qualitative factors to determine whether it is more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying amount as a basis for determining whether it is necessary to perform the two-step goodwill impairment test described in Accounting Standards Codification Topic 350. This guidance will become effective for annual or interim goodwill impairment tests for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2011. The Company will adopt this starting in fiscal 2012 and it is not expected to have a significant effect on its financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

(2) ACQUISITIONS

        On March 12, 2010, the Company acquired Delta, plc. ("Delta") a public limited company incorporated in Great Britain, and listed on the London Stock Exchange (LSE: DLTA). The price paid per share was 185 pence in cash for each Delta share, or £284,463 ($436,736 based on the contracted average exchange rate of $1.5353/£). Delta has manufacturing operations employing over 2,500 people in Australia, Asia, South Africa and the United States. Delta's businesses include engineered steel products, galvanizing services and manganese materials.

        The Company's pro forma results of operations for the fiscal years ended December 26, 2009 and December 25, 2010, assuming that the acquisition occurred at the beginning of each year was as follows:

        On June 24, 2011 the Company acquired the remaining 40% of Donhad Pty. Ltd. ("Donhad") that it did not own for $25,253. As this transaction was the acquisition of the remaining shares of a

56

---

Table of Contents

Valmont Industries, Inc. and Subsidiaries

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

Three-year period ended December 31, 2011

(Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)

(2) ACQUISITIONS (Continued)

consolidated subsidiary with no change in control, it was recorded within shareholders' equity. On June 1, 2011, the Company acquired 60% of an irrigation monitoring services company for $1,539. This acquisition did not have a a significant effect on the Company's fiscal 2011 financial results.

(3) CASH FLOW SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION

        The Company considers all highly liquid temporary cash investments purchased with an original maturity of three months or less at the time of purchase to be cash equivalents. Cash payments for interest and income taxes (net of refunds) were as follows:

(4) INVENTORIES

        Inventories consisted of the following at December 31, 2011 and December 25, 2010:

        In 2010 and 2009, the Company reduced its LIFO inventory quantities, thereby liquidating a portion of its LIFO inventories acquired in prior years. The result of this liquidation was an increase in operating income of $1,509 and $5,503 for the fiscal years ended December 25, 2010 and December 26, 2009, respectively.

(5) PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT

        Property, plant and equipment, at cost, consist of the following:

57

---

Table of Contents

Valmont Industries, Inc. and Subsidiaries

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

Three-year period ended December 31, 2011

(Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)

(5) PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT (Continued)

        The Company leases certain facilities, machinery, computer equipment and transportation equipment under operating leases with unexpired terms ranging from one to fifteen years. Rental expense for operating leases amounted to $22,775, $15,652, and $16,293 for fiscal 2011, 2010, and 2009, respectively.

        Minimum lease payments under operating leases expiring subsequent to December 31, 2011 are:

(6) GOODWILL AND INTANGIBLE ASSETS

        The Company's annual impairment testing of goodwill was performed during the third quarter of 2011. As a result of that testing, the Company determined that its goodwill and intangible assets were not impaired, although the fair value of the Webforge reporting unit in the Engineered Infrastructure Products segment, which has approximately $64,500 of goodwill, was not substantially higher than carrying value. The Company continues to monitor changes in the global economy that could impact future operating results of its reporting units. If such conditions arise, the Company will test a given reporting unit for impairment prior to the annual test.

Amortized Intangible Assets

        The components of amortized intangible assets at December 31, 2011 and December 25, 2010 were as follows:

58

---

Table of Contents

Valmont Industries, Inc. and Subsidiaries

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

Three-year period ended December 31, 2011

(Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)

(6) GOODWILL AND INTANGIBLE ASSETS (Continued)

        Amortization expense for intangible assets was $14,833, $11,873, and $8,953 for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2011, December 25, 2010 and December 26, 2009, respectively. Estimated annual amortization expense related to finite-lived intangible assets is as follows:

        The useful lives assigned to finite-lived intangible assets included consideration of factors such as the Company's past and expected experience related to customer retention rates, the remaining legal or contractual life of the underlying arrangement that resulted in the recognition of the intangible asset and the Company's expected use of the intangible asset.

Non-amortized intangible assets

        Intangible assets with indefinite lives are not amortized. The carrying values of trade names at December 31, 2011 and December 25, 2010 were as follows:

59

---

Table of Contents

Valmont Industries, Inc. and Subsidiaries

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

Three-year period ended December 31, 2011

(Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)

(6) GOODWILL AND INTANGIBLE ASSETS (Continued)

        The Company's trade names were tested for impairment separately from goodwill in the third quarter of 2011. The values of the trade names were determined using the relief-from-royalty method. The Company determined that the value of its trade names were not impaired, except for the PiRod and Industrial Galvanizers of America trade names. The evaluations of these trade names were completed in the fourth quarter of 2011, which resulted in a write down of $3,779.

        In its determination of these intangible assets as indefinite-lived, the Company considered such factors as its expected future use of the intangible asset, legal, regulatory, technological and competitive factors that may impact the useful life or value of the intangible asset and the expected costs to maintain the value of the intangible asset. The Company expects that these intangible assets will maintain their value indefinitely. Accordingly, these assets are not amortized.

Goodwill

        The carrying amount of goodwill by segment as of December 31, 2011 was as follows:

        The Company examined the goodwill assigned to its reporting units in the third quarter of 2011 and determined that the goodwill on its consolidated balance sheet at December 31, 2011 was not impaired. The impairment charge relates to a Irrigation segment retail operation. In the fourth quarter of 2011, the Company decided to dispose of this operation and, accordingly, all of the goodwill assigned to that operation was written off. The goodwill from acquisitions arose from the acquisition of a Brazilian irrigation monitoring company.            

        The carrying amount of goodwill by segment as of December 25, 2010 was as follows:

        The goodwill from acquisitions resulted from the acquisition of Delta plc in May 2010.

60

---

Table of Contents

Valmont Industries, Inc. and Subsidiaries

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

Three-year period ended December 31, 2011

(Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)

(7) BANK CREDIT ARRANGEMENTS

        The Company maintains various lines of credit for short-term borrowings totaling $51,857. As of December 31, 2011, $5,046 was outstanding. The interest rates charged on these lines of credit vary in relation to the banks' costs of funds. The unused borrowings under the lines of credit were $46,811 at December 31, 2011. The lines of credit can be modified at any time at the option of the banks. The Company pays no fees in connection with these lines of credit. In addition to the lines of credit, the Company also maintains other short-term bank loans. The weighted average interest rate on short-term borrowings was 3.42% at December 31, 2011, and 3.38% at December 25, 2010. Other notes payable of $6,357 were outstanding at December 31, 2011.

(8) INCOME TAXES

        Earnings before income taxes and equity in earnings of nonconsolidated subsidiaries are as follows:

        Income tax expense (benefit) consists of:

61

---

Table of Contents

Valmont Industries, Inc. and Subsidiaries

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

Three-year period ended December 31, 2011

(Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)

(8) INCOME TAXES (Continued)

        The reconciliations of the statutory federal income tax rate and the effective tax rate follows:

        Deferred income taxes reflect the net tax effects of (a) temporary differences between the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities for financial reporting purposes and the amounts used for income tax purposes, and (b) operating loss and tax credit carryforwards. The tax effects of significant items comprising the Company's net deferred income tax liabilities are as follows:

        Uncertain tax positions included in other non-current liabilities are evaluated in a two-step process, whereby (1) the Company determine whether it is more likely than not that the tax positions will be sustained based on the technical merits of the position and (2) for those tax positions that meet the more likely than not recognition threshold, the Company would recognize the largest amount of tax

62

---

Table of Contents

Valmont Industries, Inc. and Subsidiaries

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

Three-year period ended December 31, 2011

(Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)

(8) INCOME TAXES (Continued)

benefit that is greater than fifty percent likely to be realized upon ultimate settlement with the related tax authority.

        The following summarizes the activity related to our unrecognized tax benefits in 2011, 2010 and 2009, in thousands:

        There are approximately $1,389 of uncertain tax positions for which reversal is reasonably possible during the next 12 months due to the closing of the statute of limitation. The nature of these uncertain tax positions is generally the computation of a tax deduction or tax credit. In the third quarter of 2009, the Company recorded a reduction of its gross unrecognized tax benefit of $594, with $386 recorded as a reduction of income tax expense, due to the expiration of statutes of limitation in the United States. In the second quarter of 2010, an additional $3,000 of uncertain tax positions were recorded in connection with the acquisition of Delta and did not impact current tax expense. In the third quarter of 2011, the Company recorded a reduction of its gross unrecognized tax benefit of $2,224 with $1,446 recorded as a reduction of income tax expense, due to the expiration of statutes of limitation in the United States and Australia. In addition to these amounts, there was an aggregate of $413 and $421 of interest and penalties at December 31, 2011 and December 25, 2010, respectively. The Company's policy is to record interest and penalties directly related to income taxes as income tax expense in the Consolidated Statements of Earnings.

        The Company files income tax returns in the U.S. and various states as well as foreign jurisdictions. Tax years 2008 and forward remain open under U.S. statutes of limitation. Generally, tax years 2007 and forward remain open under state statutes of limitation. The total amount of unrecognized tax benefits that, if recognized, would affect the effective tax rate was $4,098 and $5,504 at December 31, 2011 and December 25, 2010, respectively.

        At December 31, 2011 and December 25, 2010, net deferred tax assets of $102,738 and $30,138, respectively, were included in refundable and deferred income taxes ($43,819 at December 31, 2011 and $29,206 at December 25, 2010) and other assets ($58,920 at December 31, 2011 and $932 at December 25, 2010). At December 31, 2011 and December 25, 2010, net deferred tax liabilities of $85,497 and $89,922, respectively, are included in deferred income taxes.

        During 2010, the gross deferred income tax assets and valuation allowances increased significantly. These increases were a result of the acquisition of Delta. At December 31, 2011 and December 25, 2010 respectively, there were $166,020 and $174,283 relating mainly to operating loss and tax credit carryforwards and $17,006 and $31,251 related to its defined benefit pension obligation.

63

---

Table of Contents

Valmont Industries, Inc. and Subsidiaries

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

Three-year period ended December 31, 2011

(Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)

(8) INCOME TAXES (Continued)

        In 2011, the company formulated and executed a restructuring plan that resulted in the company being more likely than not to be able to use some of these deferred tax assets. As a result, the company removed valuation allowances with a corresponding decrease in tax expense of $34,402 relating mainly to operating losses and $31,300 relating to defined benefit pension obligation.

        At December 31, 2011 and December 25, 2010, management of the Company reviewed recent operating results and projected future operating results. The Company's belief that realization of its net deferred tax assets is more likely than not is based on, among other factors, changes in operations that have occurred in recent years and available tax planning strategies.

        Valuation allowances have been established for certain operating losses that reduce deferred tax assets to an amount that will, more likely than not, be realized. The deferred tax assets at December 31, 2011 that are associated with tax loss and tax credit carryforwards not reduced by valuation allowances expire in periods starting 2012 through 2027. The currency translation adjustments in "Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)" are not adjusted for income taxes as they relate to indefinite investments in non-US subsidiaries.

        During 2011 the Company recorded $1,647 in income tax expense on $23,929 of undistributed earnings of foreign subsidiaries which are not considered permanently invested. Provision has not been made for United States income taxes on a portion of the undistributed earnings of the Company's foreign subsidiaries (approximately $518,887 at December 31, 2011 and $387,586 at December 25, 2010, respectively) because the Company intends to reinvest those earnings. Such earnings would become taxable upon the sale or liquidation of these foreign subsidiaries or upon remittance of dividends.

(9) LONG-TERM DEBT

64

---

Table of Contents

Valmont Industries, Inc. and Subsidiaries

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

Three-year period ended December 31, 2011

(Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)

(9) LONG-TERM DEBT (Continued)

        The lending agreements include certain maintenance covenants, including financial leverage and interest coverage. The Company was in compliance with all debt covenants at December 31, 2011.

        The minimum aggregate maturities of long-term debt for each of the four years following 2011 are: $235, $283, $268 and $281.

(10) STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION

        The Company maintains stock-based compensation plans approved by the shareholders, which provide that the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors may grant incentive stock options, nonqualified stock options, stock appreciation rights, non-vested stock awards and bonuses of common stock. At December 31, 2011, 621,576 shares of common stock remained available for issuance under the plans. Shares and options issued and available are subject to changes in capitalization. The

65

---

Table of Contents

Valmont Industries, Inc. and Subsidiaries

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

Three-year period ended December 31, 2011

(Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)

(10) STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION (Continued)

Company's policy is to issue shares upon exercise of stock options from treasury shares held by the Company.

        Under the stock option plans, the exercise price of each option equals the market price at the time of the grant. Options vest beginning on the first anniversary of the grant in equal amounts over three to six years or on the fifth anniversary of the grant. Expiration of grants is from six to ten years from the date of grant. The Company recorded $5,623, $4,893 and $4,046 of compensation expense (included in selling, general and administrative expenses) in the 2011, 2010 and 2009 fiscal years, respectively. The associated tax benefits recorded in the 2011, 2010 and 2009 fiscal years was $2,137, $1,859 and $1,558, respectively.

        At December 31, 2011, the amount of unrecognized stock option compensation expense, to be recognized over a weighted average period of 2.26 years, was approximately $10,011.

        The Company uses a binomial option pricing model to value its stock options. The fair value of each option grant made in 2011, 2010 and 2009 was estimated using the following assumptions:

        Following is a summary of the activity of the stock plans during 2009, 2010 and 2011:

66

---

Table of Contents

Valmont Industries, Inc. and Subsidiaries

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

Three-year period ended December 31, 2011

(Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)

(10) STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION (Continued)

        The weighted average per share fair value of options granted during 2009 was $22.97.

        The weighted average per share fair value of options granted during 2010 was $23.69.

        The weighted average per share fair value of options granted during 2011 was $23.32.

67

---

Table of Contents

Valmont Industries, Inc. and Subsidiaries

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

Three-year period ended December 31, 2011

(Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)

(10) STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION (Continued)

        Following is a summary of the status of stock options outstanding at December 31, 2011:

        In accordance with shareholder-approved plans, the Company grants stock under various stock-based compensation arrangements, including non-vested stock and stock issued in lieu of cash bonuses. Under such arrangements, stock is issued without direct cost to the employee. In addition, the Company grants restricted stock units. The restricted stock units are settled in Company stock when the restriction period ends. During fiscal 2011, 2010 and 2009, the Company granted non-vested stock and restricted stock units to directors and certain management employees as follows (which are included in the above stock plan activity tables):

        At December 31, 2011 the amount of deferred stock-based compensation granted, to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 2.2 years, was approximately $5,469.

68

---

Table of Contents

Valmont Industries, Inc. and Subsidiaries

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

Three-year period ended December 31, 2011

(Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)

(11) EARNINGS PER SHARE

        The following table provides a reconciliation between Basic and Diluted earnings per share (EPS):

        At the end of fiscal years 2011, 2010 and 2009, there were approximately 20,000, 8,000, and 255,000 options outstanding, respectively, with exercise prices exceeding the market value of common stock that were therefore excluded from the computation of diluted shares outstanding.

(12) EMPLOYEE RETIREMENT SAVINGS PLAN

        Established under Internal Revenue Code Section 401(k), the Valmont Employee Retirement Savings Plan ("VERSP") is a defined contribution plan available to all eligible employees. Participants can elect to contribute up to 50% of annual pay, on a pretax and/or after-tax basis. The Company also makes contributions to the Plan and a non-qualified deferred compensation plan for certain Company executives. The 2011, 2010 and 2009 Company contributions to these plans amounted to approximately $8,700, $8,300, and $8,700 respectively.

        The Company sponsors a fully-funded, non-qualified deferred compensation plan for certain Company executives who otherwise would be limited in receiving company contributions into VERSP under Internal Revenue Service regulations. The invested assets and related liabilities to these participants were approximately $19,100 and $18,400 at December 31, 2011 and December 25, 2010, respectively. Such amounts are included in "Other assets" and "Other noncurrent liabilities" on the Consolidated Balance Sheets. In fiscal 2011, $322 was distributed from the Company's non-qualified deferred compensation plan to participants under the transition rules of section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code. All distributions were made in cash.

69

---

Table of Contents

Valmont Industries, Inc. and Subsidiaries

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

Three-year period ended December 31, 2011

(Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)

(13) DISCLOSURES ABOUT THE FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS

        The carrying amount of cash and cash equivalents, receivables, accounts payable, notes payable to banks and accrued expenses approximate fair value because of the short maturity of these instruments. The fair values of each of the Company's long-term debt instruments are based on the amount of future cash flows associated with each instrument discounted using the Company's current borrowing rate for similar debt instruments of comparable maturity. The fair value estimates are made at a specific point in time and the underlying assumptions are subject to change based on market conditions. At December 31, 2011 the carrying amount of the Company's long-term debt was $474,650 with an estimated fair value of approximately $513,449. At December 25, 2010, the carrying amount of the Company's long-term debt was $468,154 with an estimated fair value of approximately $481,275.

        For financial reporting purposes, a three-level hierarchy for fair value measurements based upon the transparency of inputs to the valuation of an asset or liability as of the measurement date is used. Inputs refers broadly to the assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability, including assumptions about risk. Financial assets and liabilities carried at fair value will be classified and disclosed in one of the following three categories:

•

Level 1: Quoted market prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.



•

Level 2: Observable market based inputs or unobservable inputs that are corroborated by market data.



•

Level 3: Unobservable inputs that are not corroborated by market data.

The categorization within the valuation hierarchy is based upon the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement. Following is a description of the valuation methodologies used for assets and liabilities measured at fair value.

        Trading Securities: The assets and liabilities recorded for the investments held in the Valmont Deferred Compensation Plan represent mutual funds, invested in debt and equity securities, classified as trading securities, considering the employee's ability to change investment allocation of their deferred compensation at any time. Quoted market prices are available for these securities in an active market and therefore categorized as a Level 1 input.

70

---

Table of Contents

Valmont Industries, Inc. and Subsidiaries

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

Three-year period ended December 31, 2011

(Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)

(13) DISCLOSURES ABOUT THE FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS (Continued)

(14) DERIVATIVE FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS

        The Company manages risk from foreign currency rate risk related to foreign currency denominated transactions and from natural gas supply pricing. From time to time, the Company manages these risks using derivative financial instruments. These derivative financial instruments are marked to market and recorded in the Company's consolidated statement of operations. Derivative financial instruments have credit risk and market risk. To manage credit risk, the Company only enters into derivative transactions with counterparties who are recognized, stable multinational banks.

        Natural Gas Prices:    Natural gas supplies to meet production requirements of production facilities are purchased at market prices. Natural gas market prices are volatile and the Company effectively fixes prices for a portion of its natural gas usage requirements of certain of its U.S. facilities through the use of swaps. These contracts reference physical natural gas prices or appropriate NYMEX futures contract prices. While there is a strong correlation between the NYMEX futures contract prices and the Company's delivered cost of natural gas, the use of financial derivatives may not exactly offset the change in the price of physical gas. The contracts are traded in months forward and settlement dates are scheduled to coincide with gas purchases during that future period.

        Annual consolidated purchase requirements are approximately 900,000 MMBtu. At December 31,2011 there were no open swaps outstanding. At December 25, 2010, there were open swaps totaling 180,000 MMBtu with a total unrealized loss of $1, which was recorded in the Company's consolidated statement of operations for the fiscal year ended December 25, 2010.

        Foreign Currency Fluctuations:    The Company operates in a number of different foreign countries and may enter into business transactions that are in currencies that are different from a given operation's functional currency. In certain cases, the Company may enter into foreign currency exchange contracts to manage a portion of the foreign exchange risk associated with either a receivable or payable denominated in a foreign currency, a forecasted transaction or a series of forecasted transactions denominated in a foreign currency.

        There were no significant open foreign currency contracts at December 31, 2011 or December 25, 2010. For the fiscal year ended December 26, 2009, the Company recorded losses $2,127 in its consolidated statements of earnings associated with certain contracts to fix the Polish zloty/euro exchange rate on forecasted sales transactions of its Polish manufacturing operation that were denominated in euros.

71

---

Table of Contents

Valmont Industries, Inc. and Subsidiaries

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

Three-year period ended December 31, 2011

(Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)

(15) GUARANTEES

        The Company has guaranteed the repayment of a bank loan of a nonconsolidated equity investee. The guarantee continues until the loan, including accrued interest and fees, have been paid in full. The maximum amount of the guarantee is limited to the sum of the total due and unpaid principal amounts, accrued and unpaid interest and any other related expenses. As of December 31, 2011, the maximum amount of the guarantee was approximately $700. This loan guarantee is accompanied by a guarantee from the majority owner to the Company. The Company recorded the fair value of these guarantees of $100 in "Accrued expenses" at December 31, 2011 and December 25, 2010.

        The Company's product warranty accrual reflects management's best estimate of probable liability under its product warranties. Historical product claims data is used to estimate the cost of product warranties at the time revenue is recognized.

        Changes in the product warranty accrual, which is recorded in "Accrued expenses", for the years ended December 31, 2011 and December 25, 2010, were as follows:

(16) DEFINED BENEFIT RETIREMENT PLAN

        Delta provides defined benefit retirement income to eligible employees in the United Kingdom and is the plan sponsor. Pension retirement benefits to qualified employees are 1.67% of final salary per year of service upon reaching the age of 65 years. This Plan has no active employees as members at December 31, 2011.

Funded Status

        The Company recognizes the overfunded or underfunded status of the pension plan as an asset or liability. The funded status represents the difference between the projected benefit obligation (PBO) and the fair value of the plan assets. The PBO is the present value of benefits earned to date by plan participants, including the effect of assumed future salary increases (if applicable) and inflation. Plan assets are measured at fair value. At the date of the Delta acquisition (May 12, 2010), the Company determined fair value of the PBO and plan assets. Because the pension plan is denominated in British pounds sterling, the Company used exchange rates of $1.5442/£ and $1.5425/£ to translate the net pension liability into U.S. dollars at December 25, 2010 and December 31, 2011, respectively.

        Projected Benefit Obligation and Fair Value of Plan Assets—The accumulated benefit obligation (ABO) is the present value of benefits earned to date assuming no future compensation growth. As there are no active employees in the plan, the ABO is equal to the PBO. The underfunded ABO represents the difference between the PBO and the fair value of plan assets. Changes in the PBO and

72

---

Table of Contents

Valmont Industries, Inc. and Subsidiaries

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

Three-year period ended December 31, 2011

(Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)

(16) DEFINED BENEFIT RETIREMENT PLAN (Continued)

fair value of plan assets for the pension plan for the period from May 12, 2010 to December 25, 2010 were as follows:

        Changes in the PBO and fair value of plan assets for the pension plan for the period from December 26, 2010 to December 31, 2011 were as follows:

        Pre-tax amounts recognized in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) as of December 31, 2011 and December 25, 2010 consisted of actuarial gains:

73

---

Table of Contents

Valmont Industries, Inc. and Subsidiaries

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

Three-year period ended December 31, 2011

(Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)

(16) DEFINED BENEFIT RETIREMENT PLAN (Continued)

        Assumptions—The weighted-average actuarial assumptions used to determine the benefit obligation at December 31, 2011 and December 25, 2010 were as follows:

Expense

        Pension expense is determined based upon the annual service cost of benefits (the actuarial cost of benefits earned during a period) and the interest cost on those liabilities, less the expected return on plan assets. The expected long-term rate of return on plan assets is applied to a calculated value of plan assets that recognizes changes in fair value over a five-year period. This practice is intended to reduce year-to-year volatility in pension expense, but it can have the effect of delaying the recognition of differences between actual returns on assets and expected returns based on long-term rate of return assumptions. Differences in actual experience in relation to assumptions are not recognized in net earnings immediately, but are deferred and, if necessary, amortized as pension expense.

        The components of the net periodic pension expense were as follows for the period from May 12, 2010 to December 25, 2010 and for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2011 were as follows:

        Assumptions—The weighted-average actuarial assumptions used to determine expense are as follows for fiscal 2011 and 2010:

        The discount rate is based on the annualized yield on the iBoxx over the 15-year AA-rated corporate bonds index with cash flows generally matching the Plan's expected benefit payments. The expected return on plan assets is based on our asset allocation mix and our historical return, taking into account current and expected market conditions.

74

---

Table of Contents

Valmont Industries, Inc. and Subsidiaries

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

Three-year period ended December 31, 2011

(Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)

(16) DEFINED BENEFIT RETIREMENT PLAN (Continued)

Cash Contributions

        Employer contributions to the pension plan have been set at $9,718 (£6,300) per annum in accordance with the Plan's 10-year recovery plan, along with a contribution to cover the administrative costs of the Plan of approximately $1,543 (£1,000) per annum.

Benefit Payments

        The following table details expected pension benefit payments for the years 2012 through 2021:

Asset Allocation Strategy

        The investment strategy for pension plan assets is to maintain a diversified portfolio mainly in long-term fixed-income securities that are investment grade or government-backed in nature. The plan, as required by U.K. law, has an independent trustee that sets investment policy and consults with representatives of the plan sponsor and independent advisors regularly on such matters.

        The pension plan investments are held in a trust. Most of the pension plan assets are invested in fixed income securities. The debt portfolio is also broadly diversified and invested primarily in U.K. Treasury and corporate securities. The weighted-average maturity of the debt portfolio was 12 years at December 31, 2011.

Fair Value Measurements

        The pension plan assets are valued at fair value. The following is a description of the valuation methodologies used for the investments measured at fair value, including the general classification of such instruments pursuant to the valuation hierarchy.

        Index-linked gilts—Index-linked gilts are U.K. government-backed securities consisting of bills, notes, bonds, and other fixed income securities issued directly by the U.K. Treasury or by government-sponsored enterprises.

        Corporate Bonds—Corporate bonds and debentures consist of fixed income securities issued by U.K. corporations.

        Corporate Stock—This investment category consists of common and preferred stock issued by U.K. and non-U.K. corporations.

        These assets are pooled investment funds whereby the underlying investments can be valued using quoted market prices. As the fair values of the pooled investment funds themselves are not publicly quoted, they are classified as Level 2 investments.            

75

---

Table of Contents

Valmont Industries, Inc. and Subsidiaries

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

Three-year period ended December 31, 2011

(Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)

(16) DEFINED BENEFIT RETIREMENT PLAN (Continued)

        At December 31, 2011 and December 25, 2010, the pension plan assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis were as follows:

 

(17) BUSINESS SEGMENTS

        The Company aggregates its operating segments into four reportable segments. Aggregation is based on similarity of operating segments as to economic characteristics, products, production processes, types or classes of customer and the methods of distribution. Net corporate expense is net of certain service-related expenses that are allocated to business units generally on the basis of employee headcounts and sales dollars.

        Reportable segments are as follows:

        ENGINEERED INFRASTRUCTURE PRODUCTS:     This segment consists of the manufacture of engineered metal structures and components for the global lighting and traffic, wireless communication, roadway safety and access systems applications;

        UTILITY SUPPORT STRUCTURES:     This segment consists of the manufacture of engineered steel and concrete structures for the global utility industry;

        COATINGS:     This segment consists of galvanizing, anodizing and powder coating services on a global basis; and

76

---

Table of Contents

Valmont Industries, Inc. and Subsidiaries

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

Three-year period ended December 31, 2011

(Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)

(17) BUSINESS SEGMENTS (Continued)

        IRRIGATION:     This segment consists of the manufacture of agricultural irrigation equipment and related parts and services for the global agricultural industry.

        In addition to these four reportable segments, the Company has other businesses and activities that individually are not more than 10% of consolidated sales. These include the manufacture of forged steel grinding media for the mining industry, tubular products for industrial customers, the electrolytic manganese dioxide for disposable batteries and the distribution of industrial fasteners and are reported in the "Other" category.

        The accounting policies of the reportable segments are the same as those described in Note 1. The Company evaluates the performance of its business segments based upon operating income and invested capital. The Company does not allocate interest expense, non-operating income and deductions, or income taxes to its business segments.

Summary by Business Segments

77

---

Table of Contents

Valmont Industries, Inc. and Subsidiaries

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

Three-year period ended December 31, 2011

(Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)

(17) BUSINESS SEGMENTS (Continued)

78

---

Table of Contents

Valmont Industries, Inc. and Subsidiaries

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

Three-year period ended December 31, 2011

(Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)

(17) BUSINESS SEGMENTS (Continued)

Summary by Geographical Area by Location of Valmont Facilities:

        No single customer accounted for more than 10% of net sales in 2011, 2010, or 2009. Net sales by geographical area are based on the location of the facility producing the sales and do not include sales to other operating units of the company. No foreign country other than as disclosed herein accounted for more than 5% of the Company's net sales.

        Operating income by business segment and geographical areas are based on net sales less identifiable operating expenses and allocations and includes profits recorded on sales to other operating units of the company.

        Long-lived assets consist of property, plant and equipment, net of depreciation, goodwill, other intangible assets and other assets. Long-lived assets by geographical area are based on location of facilities.

(18) GUARANTOR/NON-GUARANTOR FINANCIAL INFORMATION

        On April 8, 2010, the Company issued $300,000 of senior unsecured notes at a coupon interest rate of 6.625% per annum. In June 2011, the Company issued an additional $150,000 principal amount of these notes to redeem the senior subordinated notes. The notes are guaranteed, jointly, severally, fully and unconditionally by certain of the Company's current and future direct and indirect domestic and foreign subsidiaries (collectively the "Guarantors"), excluding its other current domestic and foreign subsidiaries which do not guarantee the debt (collectively referred to as the "Non-Guarantors"). All Guarantors are 100% owned by the parent company.

79

---

Table of Contents

Valmont Industries, Inc. and Subsidiaries

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

Three-year period ended December 31, 2011

(Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)

(18) GUARANTOR/NON-GUARANTOR FINANCIAL INFORMATION (Continued)

        Consolidated financial information for the Company ("Parent"), the Guarantor subsidiaries and the Non-Guarantor subsidiaries is as follows:

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF EARNINGS
For the Year ended December 31, 2011

80

---

Table of Contents

Valmont Industries, Inc. and Subsidiaries

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

Three-year period ended December 31, 2011

(Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)

(18) GUARANTOR/NON-GUARANTOR FINANCIAL INFORMATION (Continued)

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF EARNINGS

For the Year ended December 25, 2010

81

---

Table of Contents

Valmont Industries, Inc. and Subsidiaries

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

Three-year period ended December 31, 2011

(Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)

(18) GUARANTOR/NON-GUARANTOR FINANCIAL INFORMATION (Continued)

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF EARNINGS

For the Year ended December 26, 2009

82

---

Table of Contents

Valmont Industries, Inc. and Subsidiaries

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

Three-year period ended December 31, 2011

(Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)

(18) GUARANTOR/NON-GUARANTOR FINANCIAL INFORMATION (Continued)

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

December 31, 2011

83

---

Table of Contents

Valmont Industries, Inc. and Subsidiaries

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

Three-year period ended December 31, 2011

(Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)

(18) GUARANTOR/NON-GUARANTOR FINANCIAL INFORMATION (Continued)

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
December 25, 2010

84

---

Table of Contents

Valmont Industries, Inc. and Subsidiaries

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

Three-year period ended December 31, 2011

(Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)

(18) GUARANTOR/NON-GUARANTOR FINANCIAL INFORMATION (Continued)

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
For the Year Ended December 31, 2011

85

---

Table of Contents

Valmont Industries, Inc. and Subsidiaries

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

Three-year period ended December 31, 2011

(Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)

(18) GUARANTOR/NON-GUARANTOR FINANCIAL INFORMATION (Continued)

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
For the Year Ended December 25, 2010

86

---

Table of Contents

Valmont Industries, Inc. and Subsidiaries

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

Three-year period ended December 31, 2011

(Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)

(18) GUARANTOR/NON-GUARANTOR FINANCIAL INFORMATION (Continued)

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
For the Year Ended December 26, 2009

*****

87

---

Table of Contents

QUARTERLY FINANCIAL DATA (Unaudited)

(Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)

        Earnings per share are computed independently for each of the quarters. Therefore, the sum of the quarterly earnings per share may not equal the total for the year.

---

(1)

The fourth quarter of 2011 included $66,026 ($2.49 per share) of income tax benefits associated with a legal restructuring resulting in the removal of valuation allowances on deferred income tax assets and increased income tax basis in certain assets.

(2)

On May 12, 2010, we acquired 100% of the ordinary shares of Delta plc ("Delta"). Delta's operating results are included in fiscal 2010 starting May 12.

88

---

Table of Contents

ITEM 9.    CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE.

        None.

ITEM 9A.    CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES.

        The Company carried out an evaluation under the supervision and with the participation of the Company's management, including the Company's Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of the Company's disclosure controls and procedures pursuant to Securities Exchange Act Rule 13a-15. Based upon that evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that, as of the end of the period covered by this report, the Company's disclosure controls and procedures are effective to provide reasonable assurance that information required to be disclosed by the Company in the reports the Company files or submits under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 is (1) accumulated and communicated to management, including the Company's Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosures and (2) recorded, processed, summarized and reported, within the time periods specified in the Commission's rules and forms.

MANAGEMENT'S REPORT ON INTERNAL CONTROL OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING

        The Company's management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting as such term is defined in Securities Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(f). The Company carried out an evaluation under the supervision and with the participation of the Company's management, including the Company's Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the Company's internal control over financial reporting. The Company's management used the framework in Internal Control—Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations (COSO) to perform this evaluation. Based on that evaluation, the Company's management concluded that the Company's internal control over financial reporting was effective as of December 31, 2011.

        The effectiveness of the Company's internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2011 has been audited by Deloitte & Touche LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, as stated in their report, a copy of which is included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.                        

89

---

Table of Contents

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

To the Board of Directors and Shareholders of
Valmont Industries, Inc.
Omaha, Nebraska

        We have audited the internal control over financial reporting of Valmont Industries, Inc. and subsidiaries (the "Company") as of December 31, 2011, based on criteria established in Internal Control—Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. The Company's management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in the accompanying Management's Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company's internal control over financial reporting based on our audit.

        We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk, and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

        A company's internal control over financial reporting is a process designed by, or under the supervision of, the company's principal executive and principal financial officers, or persons performing similar functions, and effected by the company's board of directors, management, and other personnel to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company's internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company's assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

        Because of the inherent limitations of internal control over financial reporting, including the possibility of collusion or improper management override of controls, material misstatements due to error or fraud may not be prevented or detected on a timely basis. Also, projections of any evaluation of the effectiveness of the internal control over financial reporting to future periods are subject to the risk that the controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

        In our opinion, the Company maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2011, based on the criteria established in Internal Control—Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission.

        We have also audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated financial statements and financial statement schedule as of and for the year ended December 31, 2011 of the Company and our report dated February 28, 2012 expressed an unqualified opinion on those financial statements and financial statement schedule and included an explanatory paragraph regarding the Company's adoption of guidance related to the presentation of comprehensive income.

/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP
Omaha, Nebraska
February 28, 2012

90

---

Table of Contents

ITEM 9B.    OTHER INFORMATION.

Shareholder Return Performance Graphs

        The graphs below compare the yearly change in the cumulative total shareholder return on the Company's common stock with the cumulative total returns of the S&P Mid Cap 400 Index and the S&P Mid Cap 400 Industrial Machinery Index for the five and ten-year periods ended December 31, 2011. The Company was added to these indexes in 2009 by Standard & Poor's. The graphs assume that the beginning value of the investment in Valmont Common Stock and each index was $100 and that all dividends were reinvested.

91

---

Table of Contents

PART III

ITEM 10.    DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE.

        Except for the information relating to the executive officers of the Company set forth in Part I of this 10-K Report, the information called for by items 10, 11, and 13 is incorporated by reference to the sections entitled "Certain Shareholders", "Corporate Governance", "Board of Directors and Election of Directors", "Compensation Discussion and Analysis", "Compensation Committee Report", "Summary Compensation Table", "Grants of Plan-Based Awards for Fiscal Year 2010", "Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year-End", "Options Exercised and Stock Vested", "Nonqualified Deferred Compensation", "Director Compensation", "Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change-in-Control" and "Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance" in the Proxy Statement.

        The Company has adopted a Code of Ethics for Senior Officers that applies to the Company's Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer and Controller and has posted the code on its website at www.valmont.com through the "Investors Relations" link. The Company intends to satisfy the disclosure requirement under Item 5.05 of Form 8-K relating to amendments to or waivers from any provision of the Code of Ethics for Senior Officers applicable to the Company's Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer or Controller by posting that information on the Company's Web site at www.valmont.com through the "Investors Relations" link.

ITEM 11.    EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION.

        See Item 10.

ITEM 12.    SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS.

        Incorporated herein by reference to "Certain Shareholders" and "Equity Compensation Plan Information" in the Proxy Statement.

ITEM 13.    CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE

        See Item 10.

ITEM 14.    PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES.

        The information called for by Item 14 is incorporated by reference to the sections titled "Ratification of Appointment of Independent Auditors" in the Proxy Statement.

92

---

Table of Contents

PART IV

ITEM 15.    EXHIBITS AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES.

(a)(1)(2)    Financial Statements and Schedules.

        The following consolidated financial statements of the Company and its subsidiaries are included herein as listed below:

        All other schedules have been omitted as the required information is inapplicable or the information is included in the consolidated financial statements or related notes. Separate financial statements of the registrant have been omitted because the registrant meets the requirements which permit omission.

(a)(3)    Exhibits.

Index to Exhibits, Page 96

93

---

Table of Contents

Schedule II

VALMONT INDUSTRIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Valuation and Qualifying Accounts
(Dollars in thousands)

---

*

The deductions from reserves are net of recoveries.

94

---

Table of Contents

SIGNATURES

        Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized, on the 28th day of February, 2012.

        Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities indicated and on the dates indicated.

---

*

Mogens C. Bay, by signing his name hereto, signs the Annual Report on behalf of each of the directors indicated on this 28th day of February, 2012. A Power of Attorney authorizing Mogens C. Bay to sign the Annual Report on Form 10-K on behalf of each of the indicated directors of Valmont Industries, Inc. has been filed herein as Exhibit 24.

95

---

Table of Contents

INDEX TO EXHIBITS

96

---

Table of Contents

97

---

Table of Contents

        Pursuant to Item 601(b)(4) of Regulation S-K, certain instruments with respect to the registrant's long-term debt are not filed with this Form 10-K. Valmont will furnish a copy of such long-term debt agreements to the Securities and Exchange Commission upon request.

        Management contracts and compensatory plans are set forth as exhibits 10.1 through 10.13.

98

---