INTERCONTINENTALEXCHANGE INC/CBOT HOLDINGS INC
AMENDED
PRELIMINARY PROXY STATEMENT SUBJECT TO COMPLETION
DATED JUNE 14, 2007
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
SCHEDULE 14A
Information
Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a)
of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934
Filed by the Registrant o
Filed by a Party other than the Registrant þ
Check the appropriate box:
þ |
|
Preliminary Proxy Statement |
o |
|
Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2)) |
o |
|
Definitive Proxy Statement |
o |
|
Definitive Additional Materials |
o |
|
Soliciting Material Pursuant to §240.14a-12 |
CBOT HOLDINGS, INC.
(Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter)
INTERCONTINENTALEXCHANGE, INC.
(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than the Registrant)
Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):
þ |
|
No fee required. |
o |
|
Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and 0-11. |
|
(1) |
|
Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2) |
|
Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3) |
|
Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to Exchange Act
Rule 0-11 (set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state how it was
determined): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4) |
|
Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5) |
|
Total fee paid: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
o |
|
Fee paid previously with preliminary materials. |
|
o |
|
Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule 0-11(a)(2)
and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the
previous filing by registration statement number, or the Form or Schedule and the date of its
filing. |
|
(1) |
|
Amount Previously Paid: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2) |
|
Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3) |
|
Filing Party: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4) |
|
Date Filed: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TABLE OF CONTENTS
AMENDED
PRELIMINARY PROXY STATEMENT SUBJECT TO COMPLETION
DATED JUNE 14, 2007
SPECIAL MEETING OF THE CLASS A STOCKHOLDERS
OF
CBOT HOLDINGS, INC.
TO BE HELD ON JULY 9, 2007
PROXY STATEMENT
OF
INTERCONTINENTALEXCHANGE, INC.
SOLICITATION OF PROXIES IN OPPOSITION TO THE PROPOSED MERGER
OF
CBOT HOLDINGS, INC. WITH AND INTO CHICAGO MERCANTILE EXCHANGE
HOLDINGS INC.
This Proxy Statement (the Proxy Statement) and the
enclosed BLUE proxy card are furnished by
IntercontinentalExchange, Inc., a Delaware corporation
(ICE) (for convenience purposes, throughout this
Proxy Statement we sometimes refer to ICE as the party
soliciting proxies), in connection with ICEs solicitation
of proxies to be used at a special meeting (the Special
Stockholder Meeting) of stockholders (CBOT
Stockholders) who hold shares of Class A common
stock, par value $0.001 per share (the Shares) of
CBOT Holdings, Inc., a Delaware corporation (CBOT),
to be held on July 9, 2007, at the Union League Club of
Chicago, 65 West Jackson Boulevard, Chicago, Illinois at
3:00 p.m. Chicago time, and at any adjournments,
postponements or reschedulings thereof. Pursuant to this Proxy
Statement, ICE is soliciting proxies from (1) CBOT
Stockholders to vote AGAINST the proposal to adopt
the Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of October 17,
2006, as amended as of December 20, 2006, and as further
amended as of May 11, 2007 and June 14, 2007, among
Chicago Mercantile Exchange Holdings Inc. (CME),
CBOT and the Board of Trade of the City of Chicago, Inc., a
Delaware non-stock corporation and subsidiary of CBOT
(CBOT Sub) (as the same may be amended, the
CME Merger Agreement) whereby CBOT will be merged
with and into CME Holdings, with CME Holdings surviving the
merger (the Proposed CME Merger) and (2) CBOT
Stockholders to vote AGAINST any proposal to approve
any adjournment or postponement of the Special Stockholders
Meeting. CBOT Sub has scheduled a special meeting (the
Special Members Meeting) of holders of
Series B-1
and
Series B-2
membership interests of CBOT Sub (the CBOT Members)
to be held on July 9, 2007, at the Union League Club of
Chicago, 65 West Jackson Boulevard, Chicago, Illinois at
2:30 p.m. Chicago Time. Under the rules of the
exchange of CBOT Sub, CBOT Members are not permitted to delegate
to any other person the voting rights associated with their
membership interests (other than a person designated as a proxy
by CBOT Sub in connection with any annual or special meeting of
the membership of CBOT Sub). Therefore, ICE is not soliciting
proxies from the CBOT Members in connection with the Special
Members Meeting but ICE urges the CBOT Members to vote
AGAINST the proposals to approve the repurchase of
CBOTs Class B common stock and to effect an Amended
and Restated Certificate of Incorporation and Amended and
Restated Bylaws of CBOT Sub (collectively, the CBOT
Class B Approvals). ICE has provided in this Proxy
Statement instructions for the CBOT Members to vote
AGAINST the CBOT Class B Approvals and to
revoke any prior proxy they may have submitted to CBOT in
connection with the Special Members Meeting. CBOT has set
May 29, 2007 as the record date for determining those CBOT
Stockholders who will be entitled to vote at the Special
Stockholders Meeting and CBOT Sub has set May 29,
2007 as the record date for determining those CBOT Members who
will be entitled to vote at the Special Members Meeting (the
Record Date). The principal executive offices of
CBOT and CBOT Sub are located at 141 West Jackson
Boulevard, Chicago, Illinois 60604.
This Proxy Statement and the enclosed BLUE proxy card are first
being distributed to CBOT Stockholders on or about
June l, 2007.
WE ARE DISTRIBUTING THIS PROXY STATEMENT IN ORDER TO URGE
CBOT STOCKHOLDERS TO VOTE AGAINST THE PROPOSED CME
MERGER AND CBOT MEMBERS TO VOTE AGAINST THE CBOT
CLASS B APPROVALS. THE CONSIDERATION TO BE PAID TO CBOT
STOCKHOLDERS BY CME IN THE PROPOSED CME MERGER IS INADEQUATE AND
THE ARRANGEMENTS TO BE MADE WITH RESPECT TO CBOT MEMBERS IN THE
PROPOSED CME MERGER ARE UNSATISFACTORY, AND WE BELIEVE THAT A
BETTER ALTERNATIVE EXISTS.
On October 17, 2006, CBOT and CME announced that they had
entered into a merger agreement (the Original Merger
Agreement) pursuant to which CBOT would be merged into
CME, with each outstanding Share receiving 0.3006 of a share of
CME Class A common stock, par value $0 per share. On
March 15, 2007, ICE publicly announced that it had made a
proposal (the ICE Proposal) to CBOT to acquire all
of the outstanding Shares for a purchase price of
1.42 shares of ICE common stock, par value $0.01 per share
(the ICE Stock) per Share. In the ICE Proposal, and
through subsequent submissions to CBOT of a definitive form of
merger agreement and related governance documents, ICE largely
mirrored the non-financial terms of the Original Merger
Agreement. On May 11, 2007, CBOT announced that its board
of directors had concluded that the ICE Proposal was not
superior to the Proposed CME Merger and entered into a revised
CME Merger Agreement, pursuant to which the financial terms of
the Proposed CME Merger continue to offer holders of Shares less
merger consideration than the terms of the ICE Proposal. On
May 30, 2007, ICE announced that it had entered into an
agreement with the Chicago Board Options Exchange, Inc.
(CBOE) (the CBOE Agreement) pursuant to
which ICE and CBOE would pay, following the completion of the
merger of CBOT and ICE, to qualifying CBOT Members holding
exercise rights in CBOE (the CBOE Exercise Rights),
$500,000 to extinguish the CBOE Exercise Rights and to settle
the outstanding litigation between CBOT and CBOE regarding the
CBOE Exercise Rights. On June 11, 2007, ICE entered into an
amendment to the CBOE Agreement in order to provide that, among
other things, qualifying CBOT Members will be able to elect the
form of consideration they prefer from among three alternatives:
(1) all debt securities convertible into the shares of CBOE
following its demutualization or other conversion event, up to a
maximum of $332.75 million in aggregate value; (2) all
cash; or (3) all debt securities convertible into shares of
the combined ICE/CBOT company, up to a maximum of $332.75 in
aggregate value. If the election of debt securities of either
CBOE following its demutualization or other conversion event or
the combined ICE/CBOT company exceeds these maximums, those
electing debt securities will receive a pro rata share of the
available debt securities, with the remainder of the
consideration paid in cash. Additionally, as the total
consideration of $665.5 million, payable jointly by ICE and
CBOE, will be divided by the number of CBOT Eligible Full
Members (as defined below), each CBOE Exercise Right will be
valued at a minimum of $500,000 per Full Membership (as defined
below). If fewer than 1,331 Full Memberships are assembled,
the value of each would be greater than $500,000.
On June 12, 2007, ICE publicly announced that it had
revised the ICE Proposal to include the terms of the CBOE
Agreement, as amended, and to confirm that it remained committed
to acquiring all of the Shares on the terms set out in the ICE
Proposal, as so revised, including the purchase price of
1.42 shares of ICE Stock per Share. The revised ICE
Proposal provides that a CBOT Stockholder will have the right,
with respect to each Share held, to elect to receive merger
consideration consisting of either cash or shares of ICE Stock,
subject to proration to reflect a $2,500,000,000 ceiling on
total cash consideration. If CBOT Stockholders make valid
elections to receive more than $2,500,000,000 in cash, those
CBOT Stockholders electing to receive cash consideration will
have the cash form of consideration proportionately reduced and
will receive a portion of their consideration in ICE Stock,
despite their election. On June 14, 2007, CBOT and CME
announced that they had further amended the CME Merger Agreement
to provide for a one-time cash dividend of $9.14 per Share,
an opportunity for the holders of CBOE Exercise Rights to elect
(1) to continue as class members in the outstanding
litigation between CBOE and CBOT and to receive a guarantee of
up to a
2
$250,000 payment or (2) to sell their CBOE Exercise Rights
to CBOT for $250,000 payable following the effective time of the
Proposed CME Merger, elimination of the $15 million cap on
out-of-pocket costs incurred with respect to CMEs
obligations to prosecute the CBOE Exercise Rights litigation and
a three-year extension of the period during which
CBOT-designated directors on the combined companys board
of directors would have veto authority over rule changes
(including changes to member fees) to the 2012 Annual Meeting of
Stockholders. Based upon closing prices as of June 14,
2007, the ICE Proposal had a value of $219.55 per Share, or
approximately $11.6 billion in the aggregate, which
represented a 9.4% premium to the value of the Proposed CME
Merger as of such date, after taking into account the one-time
$9.14 cash dividend announced on June 14, 2007, and a
63.2% premium over CBOTs share price on October 16,
2006, the day before the announcement of the Proposed CME
Merger. We are confident that the CBOT Stockholders and CBOT
Members recognize that the ICE Proposal is superior to the
Proposed CME Merger, and are soliciting proxies in opposition to
the Proposed CME Merger to allow the CBOT Stockholders and CBOT
Members the opportunity to consider the ICE Proposal. As set
forth in ICEs letter to CBOT dated June 12, 2007, the
ICE Proposal is nonbinding at this time, but ICE has indicated
to CBOT its intention to submit a binding ICE Proposal to CBOT
prior to the Special Stockholders Meeting and the Special
Members Meeting.
WE ARE NOT ASKING YOU TO VOTE ON OR APPROVE THE ICE PROPOSAL
AT THIS TIME. HOWEVER, IF THE CME MERGER IS APPROVED, YOU
WILL LOSE THE OPPORTUNITY TO CONSIDER OUR FINANCIALLY SUPERIOR
PROPOSAL OR TO CONSIDER ANY OTHER FINANCIALLY SUPERIOR
OPTIONS THAT MAY BE AVAILABLE TO CBOT. A VOTE
AGAINST THE PROPOSED CME MERGER AND
AGAINST THE PROPOSED CBOT CLASS B APPROVALS
WILL SEND A CLEAR MESSAGE TO CBOTS BOARD OF DIRECTORS THAT
IT SHOULD GIVE ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATION TO THE ICE PROPOSAL.
EVEN IF YOU HAVE ALREADY SENT A PROXY CARD TO CBOT OR TO CBOT
SUB, YOU HAVE EVERY RIGHT TO CHANGE YOUR VOTE. ONLY YOUR
LATEST-DATED PROXY COUNTS. VOTE AGAINST THE
PROPOSED CME MERGER BY VOTING AGAINST EACH PROPOSAL
TO BE CONSIDERED AT THE SPECIAL STOCKHOLDERS MEETING AND
AGAINST EACH PROPOSAL TO BE CONSIDERED AT THE
SPECIAL MEMBERS MEETING.
INSTRUCTIONS FOR CBOT STOCKHOLDERS. CBOT STOCKHOLDERS CAN
VOTE OVER THE INTERNET OR PHONE BY FOLLOWING THE
INSTRUCTIONS ON THE ENCLOSED PROXY OR BY SIGNING, DATING
AND RETURNING THE ENCLOSED BLUE PROXY CARD TO US IN THE ENCLOSED
POSTAGE PAID ENVELOPE AS SOON AS POSSIBLE. PLEASE NOTE THAT TO
VOTE BY INTERNET OR PHONE YOU WILL NEED TO HAVE YOUR PROXY CARD
AVAILABLE, AS YOU WILL NEED THE INDIVIDUAL CONTROL NUMBER
ASSIGNED TO YOU AND APPEARING ON EACH CARD. SIGNING, DATING AND
RETURNING THE BLUE PROXY CARD WILL REVOKE ANY VOTE YOU HAVE
PREVIOUSLY MADE. IF YOU HAVE ALREADY VOTED TO APPROVE THE
PROPOSED CME MERGER, YOU CAN ALSO REVOKE YOUR VOTE BY VOTING
AGAINST ON ANOTHER PROXY CARD DELIVERED TO US OR TO
CBOT OR BY VOTING AGAINST BY USING THE
INSTRUCTIONS ON YOUR PROXY CARDS TO VOTE BY TELEPHONE OR
INTERNET.
INSTRUCTIONS FOR CBOT MEMBERS. IF YOU HAVE ALREADY VOTED
TO APPROVE THE CBOT CLASS B APPROVALS, YOU CAN CHANGE YOUR
VOTE AT ANY TIME BEFORE YOUR PROXY IS VOTED AT THE SPECIAL
MEMBERS MEETING. IF YOU ARE THE RECORD HOLDER OF YOUR MEMBERSHIP
INTERESTS, YOU CAN DO THIS IN ONE OF THREE WAYS. FIRST, YOU CAN
SEND CBOT A WRITTEN NOTICE STATING THAT YOU WOULD LIKE TO REVOKE
YOUR PROXY. SECOND, YOU CAN COMPLETE AND SUBMIT A NEW VALID
PROXY BEARING A LATER DATE BY MAIL OR BY FOLLOWING THE TELEPHONE
OR INTERNET VOTING INSTRUCTION PROVIDED BY CBOT. THIRD, YOU CAN
ATTEND THE SPECIAL MEMBERS MEETING AND VOTE IN PERSON. IF YOU
CHOOSE TO SEND A WRITTEN NOTICE OR TO MAIL A NEW PROXY, YOU MUST
SUBMIT YOUR NOTICE OF REVOCATION OR NEW PROXY TO CBOT C/O
GEORGESON INC., WALL STREET STATION, P.O. BOX 1100,
NEW YORK, NY
10269-0646,
AND IT MUST BE RECEIVED PRIOR TO THE SPECIAL MEMBERS MEETING.
3
IF YOU NEED ASSISTANCE OR HAVE ANY QUESTIONS REGARDING THE
DELIVERY OF YOUR BLUE PROXY CARD OR HOW TO REVOKE AN EARLIER
VOTE, PLEASE CONTACT INNISFREE M&A INC.
(INNISFREE), WHICH IS ASSISTING ICE IN THIS
SOLICITATION, AT
(877) 800-5187.
THE ICE PROPOSAL MAY, AT A LATER DATE, BECOME THE SUBJECT
OF A REGISTRATION STATEMENT (THE REGISTRATION
STATEMENT) FILED WITH THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION (THE SEC). CBOT STOCKHOLDERS AND CBOT
MEMBERS ARE ADVISED TO READ THE REGISTRATION STATEMENT AND ALL
OTHER APPLICABLE DOCUMENTS IF AND WHEN THEY BECOME AVAILABLE
BECAUSE THEY WILL INCLUDE IMPORTANT INFORMATION. CBOT
STOCKHOLDERS AND CBOT MEMBERS MAY OBTAIN A FREE COPY OF ANY
DOCUMENTS FILED BY ICE WITH THE SEC AT THE SECS WEBSITE
(www.sec.gov) OR BY DIRECTING SUCH REQUESTS TO INNISFREE, 501
MADISON AVENUE, NEW YORK, NEW YORK 10022, AT
(877) 800-5187.
REASONS
TO VOTE AGAINST THE PROPOSED CME MERGER
ICE is soliciting proxies from CBOT Stockholders in opposition
to the Proposed CME Merger and specifically AGAINST
the proposal to adopt the CME Merger Agreement and to approve
the Proposed CME Merger and ICE is urging CBOT Members to vote
AGAINST the proposal to adopt the CBOT Class B
Approvals. ICE urges all CBOT Stockholders to vote
AGAINST the Proposed CME Merger and all CBOT Members
to vote AGAINST the CBOT Class B Approvals for
the following reasons:
|
|
|
|
|
A vote AGAINST the Proposed CME Merger preserves
the opportunity of CBOT Stockholders to receive the significant
premium for their Shares contemplated by the ICE Proposal which,
if consummated, provides significantly greater financial value
than the Proposed CME Merger.
|
|
|
|
We believe that a combination of ICE and CBOT is superior to
the Proposed CME Merger and would provide substantial benefit to
the CBOT Stockholders and the CBOT Members, including, among
other factors, the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Higher Current Value, Reflective of the True Value of
CBOT. The ICE Proposal would provide CBOT
Stockholders an opportunity to realize a significant premium for
their Shares upon consummation of the transactions contemplated
by the ICE Proposal over the consideration to be paid pursuant
to the Proposed CME Merger based upon the recent trading prices
of the common stock of each of ICE, CME and CBOT. Based upon
closing prices as of June 14, 2007, the ICE Proposal had a
value of $219.55 per Share, or approximately
$11.6 billion in the aggregate, which represented a 9.4%
premium to the value of the Proposed CME Merger as of such date,
after taking into account the one-time $9.14 cash dividend
announced on June 14, 2007, and a 63.2% premium over
CBOTs share price on October 16, 2006, the day before
the announcement of the Proposed CME Merger.
|
|
|
|
The implied value of the ICE Proposal has remained at a
consistent, meaningful premium to the implied value of the
original CME proposal and the revised, increased CME
proposal. Since March 15, 2007, the implied
value of the ICE Proposal has always exceeded the value of the
Proposed CME Merger. The chart below compares the implied value
of the ICE Proposal to the implied value of both CMEs
original proposal and its revised proposal.
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
Opportunity to Share in Future Growth. Under
the ICE Proposal, CBOT Stockholders would continue to own a
greater share of the combined company than they would own after
the Proposed CME Merger such that, in addition to receiving a
premium, they would participate in the significant strategic and
financial benefits of the combination. Specifically, ICE
estimates transaction benefits of at least $250 million
annually on a pre-tax, run-rate basis upon the full integration
of ICE and CBOT. In addition to identified expense
rationalization and the revenue growth opportunities available
to the combined company, significant clearing benefits also
exist as ICE could provide a fully operational clearing solution
for CBOTs products upon termination of CBOTs
existing clearing agreement with CME in January 2009.
Accordingly, ICE believes the combination would be accretive to
cash earnings per share within 18 months of closing.
|
|
|
|
Strong Management. A combined ICE/CBOT would
be run by a strong and innovative management team combining the
best elements of ICE and CBOTs current management. With
such a management team running the combined companies,
opportunities for future growth and innovation will be strong.
|
|
|
|
|
|
We believe that ICE can successfully integrate the technology
and clearing operations of CBOT by the end of 2008 and ICE
strongly disagrees with CBOTs board of directors
assessment of the risks related to integration.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Technology Base. ICEs business is based
on electronic trading, which in addition to competition from CME
Globex, London International Financial Futures and Options
Exchange (also known as LIFFE) and other exchanges has required
that ICE maintain a leading technology platform. ICEs
technology platform has scaled from over-the-counter products to
listed futures and from energy into soft commodities, while at
the same time improving performance.
|
|
|
|
Experience in Successfully Integrating Other Trading
Platforms. ICE has a clear and readily achievable
plan to migrate CBOTs clearing and technology within
18 months. Based on ICEs previous experience
successfully integrating both the International Petroleum
Exchange (IPE) and the Board of Trade of the City of
New York, Inc. (NYBOT), as well as the fact that the
CME was able to migrate clearing for some of CBOTs
products in approximately 10 months in 2003, ICE is
confident that it can integrate CBOTs technology and
clearing operations by January 2009, which is when CBOTs
existing clearing agreement with CME could be terminated. In
addition, unlike in the Proposed CME Merger, most of CBOTs
management and employees will remain in place under the ICE
Proposal and will be able to assist in implementing the
integration of CBOTs operations.
|
|
|
|
Flexibility to Extend Technology
Contracts. ICE is confident that it could migrate
CBOTs clearing and technology within 18 months.
However, ICE recognizes that the termination dates for
CBOTs outsourced technology and clearing services
contracts may not align ideally for purposes of ICEs
planned clearing and technology migration in January 2009, and
that therefore some additional
|
5
|
|
|
|
|
flexibility in terms of extending one or both of CBOTs
outsourced technology contract or the CME clearing agreement may
be desirable. We understand that CBOT has the right to extend
the CME clearing agreement for a six month period beyond the
first termination date in January 2009 if CBOT is unable to
engage another entity prepared and able to provide comparable
clearing services on commercially reasonable terms.
Consequently, in the worst case, the combined company may have
access to clearing services for approximately 24 months
from July 9, 2007. In addition, ICE has recently held
discussions with senior management of NYSE Euronext, the parent
company of AEMS, the company that provides outsourced technology
services to CBOT. Based on these discussions, ICE believes that
NYSE Euronext would be prepared to extend CBOTs outsourced
technology agreement, if necessary, on commercially reasonable
terms for the period reasonably required to migrate CBOTs
trading platform and CBOTs clearing onto ICE platforms.
|
|
|
|
|
|
The ICE Proposal provides an opportunity for CBOT Members who
hold the required interests to realize a minimum of $500,000 in
value for each of their CBOE Exercise Rights compared to the
risk that the CBOE Exercise Rights may be extinguished for no
consideration under the Proposed CME Merger and may be subject
to a lengthy battle in court to determine the value of the CBOE
Exercise Rights, if any.
|
In contemplation of a merger between ICE and CBOT, ICE has
entered into the CBOE Agreement, as amended, which provides for
total consideration of $665.5 million to full members of
CBOT Sub who hold the required interests (each such full member,
a CBOT Eligible Full Member) for the loss of the
CBOE Exercise Rights. The consideration to CBOT Eligible Full
Members who hold the requisite interests will be paid equally by
ICE and CBOE, with each of ICE and CBOE contributing
$332.75 million. The consideration of $665.5 million
will be divided by the number of CBOT Eligible Full Members
possessing the required interests (as described below), as of
the consideration record date. Accordingly, each CBOE Exercise
Right will be valued at a minimum of $500,000 per Full
Membership (as defined below), with the final value of each CBOE
Exercise Right being determined by the number of Full
Memberships assembled. If fewer than 1,331 Full Memberships are
assembled, the value of each would be greater than $500,000.
CBOT Eligible Full Members will have the flexibility to elect
the form of consideration they prefer among the following three
alternatives: (1) all debt securities convertible into the
shares of CBOE following its demutualization or other conversion
event; (2) all cash; or (3) all debt securities
convertible into shares of the combined ICE/CBOT company. These
choices are subject to a maximum of $332.75 million in
aggregate value of debt securities convertible into shares of
the combined ICE/CBOT company and a maximum of
$332.75 million in aggregate value of debt securities
convertible into shares of CBOE following its demutualization or
other conversion event. If CBOT Eligible Full Members elect debt
securities of either CBOE following its demutualization or other
conversion event or the combined ICE/CBOT company that, in the
aggregate, exceed these maximums, those electing the debt
securities will receive a pro rata share of the available debt
securities, with the remainder of the consideration paid in cash.
|
|
|
|
|
Although CME has agreed, under the terms of the Proposed CME
Merger, to use commercially reasonable efforts to protect the
CBOE Exercise Rights and to pay holders of CBOE Exercise Rights
who elect to continue as class members in the litigation a
guaranteed minimum $250,000 payment per CBOE Exercise Right even
if CBOE prevails in the litigation, the Proposed CME Merger does
not offer qualifying CBOT Members any assurance that such CBOT
Members will receive any consideration in excess of $250,000
(or, if they do, the amount). Allowing a court to determine the
value of the CBOE Exercise Rights may take years, will be costly
to all parties, will distract management, and may ultimately
result in a decision that provides little or no value for the
CBOE Exercise Rights. In addition, CBOE has taken the position
that the CBOE Exercise Rights would be extinguished under the
Proposed CME Merger with no consideration being paid to the
holders of the CBOE Exercise Rights, and CBOE has filed a rule
application with the SEC asking for a confirmation of this
interpretation. Under the terms of the Proposed CME Merger,
holders who elect to sell their CBOE Exercise Rights to CBOT in
|
6
|
|
|
|
|
connection with the merger would receive only $250,000 in cash
as compared to the $500,000 minimum value that would be provided
under the CBOE Agreement contained in the ICE Proposal.
|
|
|
|
|
|
In addition to the consideration offered for the CBOE Exercise
Rights, under the ICE Proposal, CBOT Members who may have
foregone selling Shares in order to retain the interest required
to exercise a CBOE Exercise Right would be free to liquidate
their ownership of Shares, subject to any Share ownership
requirements associated with their clearing relationship(s).
Under the ICE Proposal, CBOT Members could elect to receive cash
consideration or sell shares of ICE Stock received in the merger
with ICE, as there would no longer be a need to retain the
Shares in connection with the CBOE Exercise Rights. In contrast,
under the Proposed CME Merger, holders of CBOE Exercise Rights
who elect to continue as class members in the litigation would
be required to continue to hold Shares in connection with the
CBOE Exercise Rights.
|
|
|
|
To be eligible to receive the CBOE Exercise Rights
consideration, a CBOT Eligible Full Member needs to possess the
required interests to exercise a CBOE Exercise Right on the
record date established by CBOT with respect to the member
meeting of CBOT held for the purpose of voting on the ICE/CBOT
merger. These interests are comprised of the following:
(1) a Class B,
Series B-1
membership in CBOT; (2) 27,338 Shares; and
(3) one CBOE Exercise Right privilege (ERP)
(the combination of these three components results in, a
Full Membership). As used in this Proxy Statement,
the term possess includes possession by ownership,
lease, or, in the case of Shares, by pledge or assignment
relating to such Shares whereunder the owner of such Shares is
precluded from selling or transferring them during the term of
such pledge or assignment agreement.
|
|
|
|
|
|
The ICE Proposal preserves and enhances CBOT Member rights
and privileges to a greater extent than the CME transaction.
|
|
|
|
|
|
The ICE Proposal includes member rights-related provisions that
are substantially similar to those contained in the definitive
documents for the Proposed CME Merger, except that instead of
receiving rights to trade all new products listed for trading on
CME, the ICE Proposal provides that CBOT Sub will be the
exclusive platform for listing and trading all new
U.S. grain products, U.S. interest rate products and
U.S. equity indices (other than those published by Frank
Russell or the New York Stock Exchange) and that neither ICE nor
any of its subsidiaries would trade products that, as of the
date of the ICE/CBOT merger agreement, are traded on the CBOT
Subs open outcry exchange or any electronic trading system
maintained by CBOT Sub. In addition, in light of the agreement
that ICE has reached with CBOE, there is no commitment to
continue to litigate issues relating to the CBOE Exercise Rights.
|
|
|
|
The ICE Proposal also contemplates that holders of
Series B-1
and B-2 membership interests would also benefit from pricing
protections on trading fees as follows: (1) prior to the
2011 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, CBOT Sub exchange fees for
holders of
Series B-1
and B-2 membership interests would generally not increase from
current levels, (2) at least until the 2014 Annual Meeting
of Stockholders of the combined company, holders of
Series B-1
and B-2 membership interests would generally benefit from
discounts of 50% or more from the lowest exchange fees available
to non-members to the extent that such a discount of 50% or more
is in effect with respect to the applicable products as of the
date the ICE/CBOT merger agreement is executed, and
(3) prior to the 2014 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, CBOT
generally will not charge any member an exchange fee lower than
that charged to B-1 and B-2 members. In contrast, the Proposed
CME Merger would only protect CBOT Member pricing to the extent
a proposed rule change is vetoed by the CBOT designees on the
combined company board of directors prior to 2012 and only if
the rule change would materially impair the business
opportunities of CBOT members.
|
|
|
|
|
|
ICE Stock is a superior and highly liquid investment vehicle,
having produced significant returns to ICE stockholders.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stronger Historic Stock Performance. ICE has
demonstrated stronger stock price performance and delivered more
attractive returns to its stockholders than CME. The value of
ICE Stock has increased
|
7
|
|
|
|
|
325.3% compared with growth in the value of the Shares of 118.4%
and in CME shares of 49.0% over the period from January 1,
2006 to June 14, 2007. In addition, from January 1,
2007 to June 14, 2007, the value of ICE Stock has increased
43.3% compared with growth in the value of CME shares of 7.4%.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Significant Liquidity. ICE Stock is highly
liquid, with average daily traded volumes in excess of
$590 million, from January 1, 2007 to June 14,
2007 compared with $381 million average daily traded
volumes, from January 1, 2007 to June 14, 2007 for the
CME, providing significant opportunity for recipients of ICE
Stock to monetize or divest their holdings with a potentially
lower market impact.
|
|
|
|
|
|
A vote AGAINST the Proposed CME Merger preserves
the heritage of CBOT.
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Proposed CME Merger would result in the disappearance of
CBOTs brand and expertise. Specifically, the Proposed CME
Merger would result in CMEs current management being the
management of the combined CME/CBOT company.
|
|
|
|
In contrast, the ICE Proposal recognizes that, for over
160 years, CBOT has been a major Chicago institution and
has anchored Chicagos position as one of the worlds
leading financial centers. Specifically, the ICE Proposal would
result in the combined ICE/CBOT company:
|
|
|
|
|
|
being managed by a combined management team comprised of the
best elements of each of ICEs and CBOTs current
management teams;
|
|
|
|
remaining headquartered in CBOTs landmark Chicago
headquarters; and
|
|
|
|
protecting and growing CBOTs metals complex.
|
|
|
|
|
|
ICE has a proven track record, with its acquisition and
integration of NYBOT and ICE Futures (formerly known as
International Petroleum Exchange, or IPE), of providing
meaningful commitments to exchange members to maintain
open-outcry markets and delivering exceptional organic growth
through innovation and technology. ICE believes that a merger of
ICE and CBOT is a unique opportunity to create a leading
derivatives trading platform across a broad spectrum of futures
and options products, incorporating ICEs and CBOTs
complementary positions in agricultural commodities and leading
capabilities in interest rates, energy, gold and silver, as well
as other financial contracts such as equity indices and foreign
exchange pairs. The combined ICE/CBOT would operate regulated
exchanges in the U.S., Europe and Asia and also support the
global over-the-counter derivatives market.
|
|
|
|
|
|
A vote AGAINST the Proposed CME Merger sends a
strong message to CBOTs board of directors that the
Proposed CME Merger is inadequate and that you want the
opportunity to accept the ICE Proposal.
|
|
|
|
|
|
By voting against the Proposed CME Merger, CBOT Stockholders and
CBOT Members can demonstrate their support for the proposed
combination of CBOT and ICE and send a strong message to
CBOTs board of directors that they want the opportunity to
accept the value offered by the ICE Proposal. A vote against the
Proposed CME Merger moves CBOT Stockholders and CBOT Members
closer to being able to benefit from the ICE Proposal. As set
forth in ICEs letter to CBOT dated June 12, 2007, the
ICE Proposal is nonbinding at this time, but ICE has indicated
to CBOT its intention to submit a binding proposal to CBOT on
the same terms as the ICE Proposal (or on terms that ICE
reasonably believes are more favorable to CBOT Stockholders and
CBOT Members than the ICE Proposal) prior to the Special
Stockholders Meeting and the Special Members Meeting.
|
|
|
|
While ICE is committed to helping CBOT Stockholders and CBOT
Members realize the value of the ICE Proposal, the ICE Proposal
cannot go forward unless the CBOT Stockholders do not approve
the Proposed CME Merger, the CBOT Members do not approve the
CBOT Class B Approvals or CBOT or CME otherwise terminates
the CME Merger Agreement. A vote for the Proposed CME Merger
could leave the CBOT Stockholders and CBOT Members without a
viable alternative to the Proposed CME Merger because ICE cannot
proceed with the ICE Proposal if the Proposed CME Merger is
approved
|
8
|
|
|
|
|
by the CBOT Stockholders and the CBOT Members. There can be no
assurance as to the occurrence or timing of any termination of
the CME Merger Agreement.
|
|
|
|
|
|
The ICE Proposal is subject to certain risks and uncertainties,
including the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
The ICE Proposal contemplates CBOT entering into a definitive
merger agreement with ICE;
|
|
|
|
Similar to the CME Merger Agreement, the exchange ratio in the
ICE Proposal is fixed, so the per Share value of the ICE
Proposal will change as a result of changes in the market price
of ICE Stock;
|
|
|
|
The synergies actually realized by the combined company as a
result of transactions contemplated by the ICE Proposal may be
less than expected, and the merger-related charges incurred by
the combined company as a result of the proposed ICE/CBOT merger
could be greater than estimated; and
|
|
|
|
The merger contemplated by the ICE Proposal will be subject to a
number of conditions, including the approval of the stockholders
of both CBOT and ICE, and with respect to the CBOT Class B
Approvals by the CBOT Members, approval of the CBOE Agreement,
as amended, by the CBOE members, and the receipt of all
regulatory approvals required for completion of the proposed
ICE/CBOT Merger. There can be no assurance that these approvals
will be obtained in the time frame anticipated or can be
obtained without unduly burdensome conditions or restrictions.
|
|
|
|
|
|
CBOT stockholders should also consider the risks that may be
associated with an investment in ICE Stock and with the
transaction contemplated by the ICE Proposal. These factors are
set forth in the Forward-Looking Statements section
of this Proxy Statement and will be described in more detail in
the Registration Statement that will be filed with the SEC if we
enter into a merger agreement with CBOT. Once the Registration
Statement is filed, CBOT Stockholders and CBOT Members may
obtain a copy of the Registration Statement free of charge at
the SECs website (www.sec.gov) or by directing a request
to ICE at 2100 RiverEdge Parkway, Suite 500, Atlanta,
Georgia 30328, Attn: Investor Relations or by email at
ir@theice.com.
|
|
|
|
We are confident that CBOT Stockholders and CBOT Members
recognize that the ICE Proposal is superior to the Proposed CME
Merger. Information with respect to the range of closing sale
prices for the Shares for certain dates and periods is set forth
in the Joint Proxy Statement/Prospectus included in the
Registration Statement on
Form S-4
filed by CME with the SEC on December 21, 2006, as most
recently amended on May 25, 2007 (the CME/CBOT
S-4).
ICE urges CBOT Stockholders and CBOT Members to obtain a current
market quotation for the Shares.
|
INSTRUCTIONS FOR CBOT STOCKHOLDERS. CBOT
STOCKHOLDERS CAN VOTE OVER THE INTERNET OR PHONE BY FOLLOWING
THE INSTRUCTIONS ON THE ENCLOSED PROXY OR BY SIGNING,
DATING AND RETURNING THE ENCLOSED BLUE PROXY CARD TO US IN THE
ENCLOSED POSTAGE PAID ENVELOPE AS SOON AS POSSIBLE. PLEASE
NOTE THAT TO VOTE BY INTERNET OR PHONE YOU WILL NEED TO
HAVE YOUR PROXY CARD AVAILABLE, AS YOU WILL NEED THE INDIVIDUAL
CONTROL NUMBER ASSIGNED TO YOU AND APPEARING ON EACH CARD.
SIGNING, DATING AND RETURNING THE BLUE PROXY CARD WILL REVOKE
ANY VOTE YOU HAVE PREVIOUSLY MADE. IF YOU HAVE ALREADY VOTED TO
APPROVE THE PROPOSED CME MERGER, YOU CAN ALSO REVOKE YOUR VOTE
BY VOTING AGAINST ON ANOTHER PROXY CARD DELIVERED TO
US OR TO CBOT OR BY VOTING AGAINST BY USING THE
INSTRUCTIONS ON YOUR PROXY CARDS TO VOTE BY TELEPHONE OR
INTERNET.
INSTRUCTIONS FOR CBOT MEMBERS. IF YOU HAVE ALREADY
VOTED TO APPROVE THE CBOT CLASS B APPROVALS, YOU CAN CHANGE
YOUR VOTE AT ANY TIME BEFORE YOUR PROXY IS VOTED AT THE SPECIAL
MEMBERS MEETING. IF YOU ARE THE RECORD HOLDER OF YOUR MEMBERSHIP
INTERESTS, YOU CAN DO THIS IN ONE OF THREE WAYS. FIRST, YOU CAN
SEND CBOT A WRITTEN NOTICE STATING THAT YOU WOULD LIKE TO REVOKE
YOUR PROXY.
9
SECOND, YOU CAN COMPLETE AND SUBMIT A NEW VALID PROXY BEARING A
LATER DATE BY MAIL OR BY FOLLOWING THE TELEPHONE OR INTERNET
VOTING INSTRUCTION PROVIDED BY CBOT. THIRD, YOU CAN ATTEND
THE SPECIAL MEMBERS MEETING AND VOTE IN PERSON. IF YOU CHOOSE TO
SEND A WRITTEN NOTICE OR TO MAIL A NEW PROXY, YOU MUST SUBMIT
YOUR NOTICE OF REVOCATION OR NEW PROXY TO CBOT C/O GEORGESON
INC., WALL STREET STATION, P.O. BOX 1100, NEW YORK, NY
10269-0646,
AND IT MUST BE RECEIVED PRIOR TO THE SPECIAL MEMBERS MEETING.
WE URGE YOU TO SEND THE CBOTS BOARD OF DIRECTORS A CLEAR
MESSAGE THAT A SALE TO CME FOR LESS PREMIUM IS NOT A DESIRED
OUTCOME AND THAT THEY SHOULD TAKE ALL NECESSARY STEPS TO
MAXIMIZE STOCKHOLDER VALUE. VOTE AGAINST THE
PROPOSED CME MERGER.
BACKGROUND
OF THE SOLICITATION
In recent years, the exchange industry in which ICE and CBOT
operate has been experiencing a period of consolidations and
strategic alliances. The ICE board of directors continually
reviews its results of operations and competitive position in
its industry, as well as its strategic plans and alternatives.
In particular, ICE has from time to time reviewed the
possibility of various strategic alliances or commercial
arrangements, including with CBOT, and the potential benefits
such alliances or arrangements would provide to the companies
and their stockholders.
On October 17, 2006, CBOT and CME announced that they had
entered into the CME Merger Agreement. The registration
statement on
Form S-4
with respect to the Proposed CME Merger, which was originally
filed on December 21, 2006 and amended most recently on
February 26, 2007 (the CME/CBOT
S-4),
provides a summary of the events leading to CME and CBOT
entering into the CME Merger Agreement.
On November 1, 2006, CBOT and CME made pre-merger
notification filings with the U.S. Federal Trade Commission
and U.S. Department of Justice (Department of
Justice). On December 1, 2006, CBOT and CME each
received a second request from the Antitrust Division of the
Department of Justice seeking additional information regarding
the Proposed CME Merger. On March 5, 2007, and May 14,
2007, ICE received civil investigative demands from the
Department of Justice seeking information about the markets in
which CME, CBOT and ICE conduct business.
On December 21, 2006, CME filed with the SEC the CME/CBOT
S-4. On
January 30, 2007, CME filed Amendment No. 1 to the
CME/CBOT
S-4. On
February 20, 2007, CME filed Amendment No. 2 to the
CME/CBOT
S-4. On
February 26, 2007, CME filed Amendment No. 3 to the
CME/CBOT
S-4. On
March 2, 2007, CBOT filed its definitive proxy statement
with respect to the Proposed CME Merger.
On March 15, 2007, ICE delivered a letter containing the
ICE Proposal to the Chairman of CBOTs board or directors,
the CBOT board of directors Special Transaction Committee,
CBOTs Chief Executive Officer, and to the Non-Exercise
Right Members Committee. The letter ICE provided to CBOT is
included in Annex A to this Proxy Statement.
On March 18, 2007, ICE, through its legal advisor,
Sullivan & Cromwell LLP, provided CBOTs board of
directors, its Special Transaction Committee, and its
Non-Exercise Right Members Committee, with a draft merger
agreement and related exhibits reflecting the terms of the ICE
Proposal.
On March 19, 2007, the CBOT board of directors, after
consultation with its legal and financial advisors, determined
that the ICE Proposal was a bona fide written Takeover
Proposal within the meaning of the CME Merger Agreement.
The CBOT board of directors authorized and directed its
transaction committee and Special Transaction Committee to
engage in discussions with, and provide information to, ICE in
connection with the ICE Proposal.
10
On March 20, 2007, CBOT and CBOT Sub announced that the
special meetings of CBOT Stockholders and CBOT Members to vote
on the CME Merger Agreement, which had been scheduled for
April 4, 2007, had been postponed to give CBOTs board
of directors, its Special Transaction Committee, and the CBOT
Sub board of directors sufficient time to complete their review
of the ICE Proposal.
On March 23, 2007, CBOT and ICE entered into a
confidentiality agreement. CBOTs legal advisors then
furnished to Sullivan & Cromwell LLP financial,
operational and due diligence requests lists.
On March 25, 2007, CBOT and ICE commenced mutual due
diligence and discussions regarding the ICE Proposal.
On March 26, 27 and 28, 2007, members of management and
other employees of CBOT and ICE, together with each
parties respective legal and financial advisors, met and
made presentations regarding various aspects of their respective
businesses and the proposed combination, including finance and
accounting projections for 2007 and 2008, potential synergies,
clearing, technology and operations, marketing and human
resources.
Through April 27, 2007, CBOT and ICE, through their
managements and representatives, continued with various aspects
of the ongoing due diligence review.
On April 11, 2007, CBOT announced that the special meetings
of CBOT Stockholders and CBOT Members to vote on the CME Merger
Agreement had been re-scheduled for July 9, 2007.
On April 20, 2007, ICE provided CBOTs board of
directors and the CBOT board of directors Special
Transaction Committee with a letter which clarified certain
aspects of the ICE Proposal, which included a revised draft
merger agreement and exhibits. The April 20, 2007 letter is
attached to Annex B of this Proxy Statement.
On April 27, 2007, ICE provided CBOT with a letter stating
that ICE was confident the integration of the clearing and
trading activities of ICE and CBOT could be accomplished within
18 months based on ICEs integration experience with
NYBOT and IPE, CBOTs previous experience moving its
clearing activities to CME and
e-cbot, the
fact that the integration would be performed by the combined
companys personnel, and the ability of CBOT to extend the
term of its clearing agreement with CME under certain
circumstances. The April 27, 2007 letter is attached as
Annex C to this Proxy Statement.
On May 1, 2007, representatives of CBOT requested that ICE
representatives travel to Chicago to discuss the ICE Proposal by
May 3, 2007. On May 3 and 4, a series of meetings were held
in Chicago between ICE and CBOT and their respective
representatives to discuss a number of proposed improvements to
the ICE Proposal requested by CBOT.
On May 7, 2007, ICE provided CBOT with a letter outlining
improvements to certain aspects of the ICE Proposal.
On May 11, 2007, CBOT and CME entered into Amendment
No. 2 to the Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of
October 17, 2006 and amended as of December 20, 2006,
and CBOT announced that the CBOT board of directors had
concluded that the ICE Proposal was not superior to the Proposed
CME Merger.
On May 25, 2007, CME filed with the SEC a new registration
statement on
Form S-4,
with respect to the Proposed CME Merger (the Revised
CME/CBOT
S-4).
ICE has worked hard, for some time, to arrive at an agreement to
resolve a dispute that has existed between CBOT and CBOE
relating to the CBOE Exercise Rights. On May 30, 2007, ICE
announced that it had entered into the CBOE Agreement with CBOE,
which ICE believes solves the disagreement relating to the
status of the CBOE Exercise Rights between CBOT and CBOE.
On June 5, 2007, CME filed Amendment No. 1 to the
Revised CME/CBOT
S-4.
On June 7, 2007, CBOT filed its definitive proxy statement
with respect to the present CME Merger Agreement.
11
On June 11, 2007, the Department of Justice announced that
it had closed its investigation into the Proposed CME Merger. On
June 11, 2007, ICE entered into an Amendment to the CBOE
Agreement with CBOE.
On June 12, 2007, ICE publicly announced that it had
resubmitted the ICE Proposal to the CBOT board of directors, its
Special Transaction Committee and the Non-Exercise Right Members
Committee, which included the CBOE Agreement, as amended, and
confirmed that ICE remained committed to acquiring all of the
Shares on the terms set out in the ICE Proposal, as so revised,
including the purchase price of 1.42 shares of ICE Stock
(subject to a cash election) for each Share. The June 12,
2007 letter is attached to Annex D of this Proxy
Statement.
On June 14, 2007, CBOT and CME announced that they had
further amended the CME Merger Agreement.
CERTAIN
INFORMATION CONCERNING THE PROPOSED CME MERGER
At the Special Stockholders Meeting, the holders of record of
CBOTs Shares at the close of business on the Record Date
will vote on, among other things, whether to approve the
Proposed CME Merger, and at the Special Members Meeting, the
holders of record of CBOT Subs
Series B-1
and
Series B-2
memberships at the close of business on the Record Date will
vote on, among other things, whether to approve the CBOT
Class B Approvals. According to the Revised CME/CBOT
S-4, under
the terms of the CME Merger Agreement, each outstanding Share
(other than Shares owned by CME or CBOT or any of their
respective wholly-owned subsidiaries) will be converted into the
right to receive 0.35 shares of Class A common stock
of CME. See also the cover page of this Proxy Statement for
additional information regarding CMEs proposal with
respect to the CBOE Exercise Price. As a result of the Proposed
CME Merger, CBOT Stockholders would end up owning approximately
34.6% of the combined company. The conditions to the
consummation of the Proposed CME Merger include, among other
things, the following: (1) the approval of the CME Merger
Agreement by CBOT Stockholders, (2) the approval of the
repurchase of CBOTs Class B common stock and an
Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation and Amended
and Restated Bylaws of CBOT Sub by the
Series B-1
and
Series B-2
members of CBOT Sub, voting together as a single class in
accordance with the terms of the existing Amended and Restated
Certificate of Incorporation and Bylaws of CBOT Sub, and
(3) the approval of the stockholders of CME. CME has also
announced that following completion of the Proposed CME Merger,
the surviving company would commence a cash tender offer for up
to $3.5 billion in common stock of the combined company at
a fixed price of $560 per share.
The CME Merger Agreement contains certain termination rights for
CME and CBOT, and further provides that if the CME Merger
Agreement is terminated under certain circumstances, CME or CBOT
will be required to pay the other a termination fee of
$288 million and to reimburse the other for up to
$6.0 million of out-of-pocket expenses.
The CME Merger Agreement provides for the payment by CBOT to CME
of $288.0 million if the CME Merger Agreement is terminated
in the following circumstances: (1) as a result of CBOT
breaching in any material respect its obligations regarding
solicitation of alternative transaction proposals;
(2) subject to CME not exercising its stockholder vote
option, if CBOTs board of directors (a) fails to
authorize, approve or recommend the CME Merger Agreement to the
CBOT Stockholders; (b) changes its recommendation to the
CBOT Stockholders; or (c) fails to remain silent with
respect to a third party tender offer or exchange offer or fails
to recommend that CBOT Stockholders reject a tender offer or
exchange offer or CBOT makes a change in recommendation
(provided that in connection with the change in recommendation
in response to a superior proposal CME does not exercise
its stockholder vote option). Additionally, if the CME Merger
Agreement is not completed by October 17, 2007 and a party
has not obtained its required stockholder approval of the merger
and related transactions, and in the case of CBOT, the required
CBOT Class B Approvals, and, in each case, a takeover
proposal involving 30% or more of the consolidated assets or
capital stock of such party has been made or announced; then, if
such party enters into or consummates the transactions
contemplated by the takeover proposal within 12 months of
termination of the CME Merger Agreement, such party must pay a
termination fee of $288.0 million to the other party. If a
party is required to pay a termination fee to the other
12
party, such party must also reimburse the other party for its
expenses, up to a maximum amount of $6.0 million.
WE ARE DISTRIBUTING THIS PROXY STATEMENT IN ORDER TO URGE
CBOT STOCKHOLDERS TO VOTE AGAINST THE PROPOSED CME
MERGER AND CBOT MEMBERS TO VOTE AGAINST THE CBOT
CLASS B APPROVALS. THE CONSIDERATION TO BE PAID BY CME IN
THE PROPOSED CME MERGER IS INADEQUATE, AND WE BELIEVE THAT
BETTER ALTERNATIVES EXIST.
CERTAIN
INFORMATION CONCERNING ICE
ICE is a company incorporated under the laws of Delaware in the
year 2000, with its principal executive offices located at 2100
RiverEdge Parkway, Suite 500, Atlanta, Georgia 30328. The
telephone number of ICE is
(770) 857-4700.
ICE operates the leading global, electronic marketplace for
trading both futures and OTC energy contracts and the leading
soft commodity exchange. ICEs markets offer access to a
range of contracts based on crude oil and refined products,
natural gas, power and emissions, as well as soft commodities
including cocoa, coffee, cotton, ethanol, orange juice, wood
pulp and sugar, in addition to currency and index futures and
options. Shares of ICE Stock are traded on the New York Stock
Exchange under the symbol ICE and, as of the date of
this Proxy Statement, ICE has a market capitalization of
approximately $10.9 billion. ICE and its subsidiaries have
approximately 470 employees.
In addition to ICE, all of the directors and nominees for
director identified in ICEs proxy statement for its 2007
annual meeting of stockholders filed with the SEC on
March 30, 2007 may potentially be participants in the
solicitation of proxies. The following officers and employees of
ICE may also potentially be participants in the solicitation of
proxies: Jeffrey C. Sprecher, Charles A. Vice, David S. Goone,
Scott A. Hill, Edwin Marcial, Johnathan H. Short, Richard V.
Spencer, Kelly L. Loeffler, Andrew J. Surdykowski, Thomas W.
Farley and David J. Peniket. The business address, business
telephone number and position or office of each participant is
set forth in Schedule I hereto. Other than
1,000 Shares owned by ICE and 22 shares of CME
Class A common stock owned by one ICE director, Charles R.
Crisp, through a managed account, neither ICE nor any of the
other potential participants in these proxy solicitations has
any interest, direct or indirect, by securities holdings or
otherwise, in CBOT or CME. None of the potential participants
will receive any special compensation in connection with these
proxy solicitations.
OTHER
PROPOSALS
In addition to soliciting proxies to approve the Proposed CME
Merger, CBOTs board of directors is also soliciting
proxies for the Special Stockholders Meeting for a proposal to
approve any adjournment or postponement of the Special
Stockholders Meeting, including if necessary, to solicit
additional proxies in favor of the adoption of the CME Merger
Agreement and the approval of the Proposed CME Merger, and CBOT
Subs board of directors is also soliciting proxies for the
Special Members Meeting with respect to a similar proposal for
the CBOT Class B Approvals, in either case if there are not
sufficient votes for that proposal (the Adjournment
Proposals). Because the Adjournment Proposals are designed
to facilitate the approval of the Proposed CME Merger and the
CBOT Class B Approvals, ICE recommends voting
AGAINST these proposals.
INSTRUCTIONS FOR CBOT STOCKHOLDERS. CBOT
STOCKHOLDERS CAN VOTE OVER THE INTERNET OR PHONE BY FOLLOWING
THE INSTRUCTIONS ON THE ENCLOSED PROXY OR BY SIGNING,
DATING AND RETURNING THE ENCLOSED BLUE PROXY CARD TO US IN THE
ENCLOSED POSTAGE PAID ENVELOPE AS SOON AS POSSIBLE. PLEASE
NOTE THAT TO VOTE BY INTERNET OR PHONE YOU WILL NEED TO
HAVE YOUR PROXY CARD AVAILABLE, AS YOU WILL NEED THE INDIVIDUAL
CONTROL NUMBER ASSIGNED TO YOU AND APPEARING ON EACH CARD.
SIGNING, DATING AND RETURNING THE BLUE PROXY CARD WILL REVOKE
ANY VOTE YOU HAVE PREVIOUSLY MADE. IF YOU HAVE ALREADY VOTED TO
APPROVE THE PROPOSED CME MERGER, YOU CAN ALSO REVOKE YOUR VOTE
BY VOTING AGAINST ON
13
ANOTHER PROXY CARD DELIVERED TO US OR TO CBOT OR BY VOTING
AGAINST BY USING THE INSTRUCTIONS ON YOUR PROXY
CARDS TO VOTE BY TELEPHONE OR INTERNET.
INSTRUCTIONS FOR CBOT MEMBERS. IF YOU HAVE ALREADY
VOTED TO APPROVE THE CBOT CLASS B APPROVALS, YOU CAN CHANGE
YOUR VOTE AT ANY TIME BEFORE YOUR PROXY IS VOTED AT THE SPECIAL
MEMBERS MEETING. IF YOU ARE THE RECORD HOLDER OF YOUR MEMBERSHIP
INTERESTS, YOU CAN DO THIS IN ONE OF THREE WAYS. FIRST, YOU CAN
SEND CBOT A WRITTEN NOTICE STATING THAT YOU WOULD LIKE TO REVOKE
YOUR PROXY. SECOND, YOU CAN COMPLETE AND SUBMIT A NEW VALID
PROXY BEARING A LATER DATE BY MAIL OR BY FOLLOWING THE TELEPHONE
OR INTERNET VOTING INSTRUCTION PROVIDED BY CBOT. THIRD, YOU
CAN ATTEND THE SPECIAL MEMBERS MEETING AND VOTE IN PERSON. IF
YOU CHOOSE TO SEND A WRITTEN NOTICE OR TO MAIL A NEW PROXY, YOU
MUST SUBMIT YOUR NOTICE OF REVOCATION OR NEW PROXY TO CBOT C/O
GEORGESON INC., WALL STREET STATION, P.O. BOX 1100, NEW YORK, NY
10269-0646,
AND IT MUST BE RECEIVED PRIOR TO THE SPECIAL MEMBERS MEETING.
Other than as set forth above, ICE is not currently aware of any
other proposals to be brought before the Special Stockholders
Meeting or the Special Members Meeting. Should other proposals
be brought before the Special Stockholders Meeting, the persons
named on the BLUE proxy card will abstain from voting on such
proposals unless such proposals adversely affect the interests
of ICE as determined by ICE in its sole discretion, in which
event such persons will vote on such proposals in their
discretion.
VOTING
PROCEDURES
Special
Stockholders Meeting
According to the Revised CME/CBOT
S-4, as of
the Record Date, there were 52,843,183 Shares entitled to
vote at the Special Stockholders Meeting. Each holder of a Share
as of the close of business on the Record Date will be entitled
to one vote for each such Share.
Under CBOTs bylaws, the presence, in person or by proxy,
of the holders of at least one-third of the total number of
outstanding Shares as of the Record Date and entitled to vote at
the Special Stockholders Meeting is necessary to constitute a
quorum at the Special Stockholders Meeting. In accordance with
the New York Stock Exchange rules, brokers and nominees who hold
Shares in street-name for customers may not exercise their
voting discretion with respect to the approval of the Proposed
CME Merger or the Adjournment Proposal related thereto. Thus,
absent specific instructions from the beneficial owner of such
Shares, these Shares will be counted for purposes of determining
whether a quorum is present. Brokers and nominees may vote such
Shares with respect to the Adjournment Proposal but may not vote
such Shares with respect to the adoption of the CME Merger
Agreement and the approval of the Proposed CME Merger.
The adoption of the CME Merger Agreement and approval of the
Proposed CME Merger requires approval of a majority of the total
outstanding Shares. Therefore, abstentions and broker non-votes
will have the same effect as a vote AGAINST the
Proposed CME Merger.
The Adjournment Proposal requires the approval of a majority of
all Shares present and voting at the Special Stockholders
Meeting if a quorum is present. Abstentions will be treated as
votes AGAINST the Adjournment Proposal but broker
non-votes will be treated as votes not cast and will have no
effect on the outcome of the Adjournment Proposal.
CBOT stockholders (1) may vote AGAINST one or
both of the proposals, (2) may abstain from voting on one
or both of the proposals or (3) may vote for one or both of
the proposals by marking the proper box on the BLUE proxy card
and signing, dating and returning it promptly in the enclosed
postage-paid envelope. If a CBOT Stockholder returns a BLUE
proxy card that is signed, dated and not marked, that
stockholder will be deemed to have voted AGAINST the
adoption of the CME Merger Agreement and approval of the
Proposed CME Merger and AGAINST the Adjournment
Proposal. Only CBOT Stockholders (or their duly appointed
proxies) of record on the Record Date are eligible to vote in
person or submit a proxy.
14
Special
Members Meeting
According to the Revised CME/CBOT
S-4, as of
the Record Date, there were 1,402
Series B-1
memberships and 812
Series B-2
memberships entitled to vote at the Special Members Meeting.
Each holder of a
Series B-1
membership as of the close of business on the Record Date will
be entitled to one vote for each
Series B-1
membership held of record at the close of business on the Record
Date, and each holder of a
Series B-2
membership as of the close of business on the Record Date will
be entitled to one-sixth of one vote for each
Series B-2
membership held of record at the close of business on the Record
Date.
In order for CBOT to satisfy its quorum requirements with
respect to the Special Members Meeting, the presence, in person
or by proxy, of the holders of Class B memberships
representing at least one-third of the votes entitled to be cast
on the matters to be acted upon at the Special Members Meeting
is required. CBOT Members will be deemed to be present if they
attend the meeting or submit a proxy card (that is not revoked)
that is received at or prior to the Special Members Meeting.
The adoption of the repurchase of CBOTs Class B
common stock (the repurchase) requires the approval
of a majority of the outstanding voting power of the CBOT
Members membership interests, voting together as a single
class. Because the required vote of the CBOT Members
membership interests to approve the repurchase is based upon the
outstanding voting power of the CBOT Members membership
interests, the failure by a CBOT Member to submit a proxy or to
vote in person at the Special Members Meeting and abstentions
will have the same effect as a vote AGAINST approval
of the repurchase.
The affirmative vote of a majority of the votes cast by the CBOT
Members membership interests, voting together as a single
class, must approve the adoption of the Amended and Restated
Certificate of Incorporation (the amendment).
Because the required vote of the CBOT Members membership
interests to approve the adoption of the amendment is based upon
the voting power of membership interests actually voted, the
failure by a CBOT Member to submit a proxy or vote in person at
the Special Members Meeting will have no effect on the vote.
However, an abstention will have the same effect as a vote
AGAINST approval of the amendment.
The CBOT Members (1) may vote AGAINST one or
more of the proposals, (2) may abstain from voting on one
or more of the proposals or (3) may vote for one or more of
the proposals.
INSTRUCTIONS FOR CBOT MEMBERS. IF YOU HAVE ALREADY
VOTED TO APPROVE THE CBOT CLASS B APPROVALS, YOU CAN CHANGE
YOUR VOTE AT ANY TIME BEFORE YOUR PROXY IS VOTED AT THE SPECIAL
MEMBERS MEETING. IF YOU ARE THE RECORD HOLDER OF YOUR MEMBERSHIP
INTERESTS, YOU CAN DO THIS IN ONE OF THREE WAYS. FIRST, YOU CAN
SEND CBOT A WRITTEN NOTICE STATING THAT YOU WOULD LIKE TO REVOKE
YOUR PROXY. SECOND, YOU CAN COMPLETE AND SUBMIT A NEW VALID
PROXY BEARING A LATER DATE BY MAIL OR BY FOLLOWING THE TELEPHONE
OR INTERNET VOTING INSTRUCTION PROVIDED BY CBOT. THIRD, YOU
CAN ATTEND THE SPECIAL MEMBERS MEETING AND VOTE IN PERSON. IF
YOU CHOOSE TO SEND A WRITTEN NOTICE OR TO MAIL A NEW PROXY, YOU
MUST SUBMIT YOUR NOTICE OF REVOCATION OR NEW PROXY TO CBOT C/O
GEORGESON INC., WALL STREET STATION, P.O. BOX 1100, NEW YORK, NY
10269-0646,
AND IT MUST BE RECEIVED PRIOR TO THE SPECIAL MEMBERS MEETING.
Revocation
of Proxy: Instructions for CBOT Stockholders
CBOT STOCKHOLDERS MAY REVOKE THEIR PROXY AT ANY TIME PRIOR TO
ITS EXERCISE BY ATTENDING THE SPECIAL STOCKHOLDERS MEETING AND
VOTING IN PERSON, BY SUBMITTING A DULY EXECUTED, LATER DATED
PROXY BY ONE OF THE METHODS PROVIDED ON THE PROXY CARD PROVIDED
TO THEM OR BY SUBMITTING A WRITTEN NOTICE OF REVOCATION TO
EITHER (A) ICE, C/O INNISFREE, 501 MADISON AVENUE, NEW
YORK, NEW YORK 10022, OR (B) THE SECRETARY OF CBOT AT THE
PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICES OF CBOT AT 141 WEST JACKSON
BOULEVARD, CHICAGO, ILLINOIS 60604. A REVOCATION MAY BE IN ANY
WRITTEN FORM VALIDLY SIGNED BY THE RECORD HOLDER AS LONG AS
IT CLEARLY STATES THAT THE
15
PROXY PREVIOUSLY GIVEN IS NO LONGER EFFECTIVE. STOCKHOLDERS WHO
HOLD THEIR SHARES IN A BANK OR BROKERAGE ACCOUNT WILL NEED TO
NOTIFY THE PERSON RESPONSIBLE FOR THEIR ACCOUNT TO REVOKE OR
WITHDRAW PREVIOUSLY GIVEN INSTRUCTIONS. WE REQUEST THAT A COPY
OF ANY REVOCATION SENT TO CBOT OR ANY REVOCATION NOTIFICATION
SENT TO THE PERSON RESPONSIBLE FOR A BANK OR BROKERAGE ACCOUNT
ALSO BE SENT TO ICE, CARE OF INNISFREE, AT THE ADDRESS BELOW SO
THAT ICE MAY MORE ACCURATELY DETERMINE IF AND WHEN PROXIES HAVE
BEEN RECEIVED FROM THE HOLDERS OF RECORD ON THE RECORD DATE OF A
MAJORITY OF CBOTS SHARES. UNLESS REVOKED IN THE
MANNER SET FORTH ABOVE, SUBJECT TO THE FOREGOING, DULY EXECUTED
PROXIES IN THE FORM ENCLOSED WILL BE VOTED AT THE SPECIAL
STOCKHOLDERS MEETING ON THE PROPOSED CME MERGER IN ACCORDANCE
WITH YOUR INSTRUCTIONS. IN THE ABSENCE OF SUCH INSTRUCTIONS,
SUCH PROXIES WILL BE VOTED AGAINST THE PROPOSED CME
MERGER.
BY EXECUTING THE BLUE PROXY CARD YOU ARE AUTHORIZING THE PERSONS
NAMED AS PROXIES TO REVOKE ALL PRIOR PROXIES ON YOUR BEHALF.
If you have any questions or require any assistance in voting
your Share(s) or CBOT membership interest(s), please contact:
501 Madison Avenue, 20th Floor
New York, New York 10022
Stockholders Call Toll Free: at
(877) 800-5187
Banks and Brokers Call Collect:
(212) 750-5833
DISSENTERS
RIGHTS
CBOT Stockholders are not entitled to appraisal rights in
connection with the Proposed CME Merger, nor will CBOT
Stockholders be entitled to appraisal rights in connection with
the ICE Proposal.
SOLICITATION
OF PROXIES
Except as set forth below, ICE will not pay any fees or
commissions to any broker, dealer, commercial bank, trust
company or other nominee for the solicitation of proxies in
connection with the ICE Proposal.
Proxies will be solicited by mail, telephone, facsimile,
telegraph, the Internet,
e-mail,
newspapers and other publications of general distribution and in
person. Directors, officers and certain employees of ICE and the
other participants listed on Schedule I hereto may assist
in the solicitation of proxies without any additional
remuneration (except as otherwise set forth in this Proxy
Statement).
ICE has retained Innisfree for solicitation and advisory
services in connection with solicitations relating to the
Special Stockholders Meeting, for which Innisfree is to receive
a fee of approximately $250,000 in connection with the
solicitation of proxies for this meeting. Up to 75 people
may be employed by Innisfree in connection with the solicitation
of proxies for the Special Stockholders Meeting. ICE has also
agreed to reimburse Innisfree for out-of-pocket expenses and to
indemnify Innisfree against certain liabilities and expenses,
including reasonable legal fees and related charges. Innisfree
will solicit proxies for the Special Stockholders Meeting from
individuals, brokers, banks, bank nominees and other
institutional holders. Directors, officers and certain employees
of ICE may assist in the solicitation of proxies without any
additional remuneration. The entire expense of soliciting
proxies for the Special Stockholders Meeting by or on behalf of
ICE is being borne by ICE.
16
If you have any questions concerning this Proxy Statement or the
procedures to be followed to execute and deliver a proxy, please
contact Innisfree at the address or phone number specified above.
FORWARD-LOOKING
STATEMENTS
Certain statements in this Proxy Statement may contain
forward-looking information regarding ICE, CBOT, and the
combined company after the completion of the possible merger
that are intended to be covered by the safe harbor for
forward-looking statements provided by the Private
Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These statements
include, but are not limited to, statements about the benefits
of the merger transaction involving ICE and CBOT, including
future strategic and financial benefits, the plans, objectives,
expectations and intentions of ICE following the completion of
the merger, and other statements that are not historical facts.
Such statements are based upon the current beliefs and
expectations of ICEs management and are subject to
significant risks and uncertainties. Actual results may differ
materially from those set forth in the forward-looking
statements. The following factors, among others, could cause
actual results to differ materially from those expressed or
implied in such forward-looking statements regarding the success
of the proposed transaction: the failure of CBOT to accept the
ICE Proposal and enter into definitive agreements to effect the
transaction; the risk that the revenue opportunities, cost
savings and other anticipated synergies from the merger may not
be fully realized or may take longer to realize than expected;
superior offers by third parties; the requisite approvals
provided for under the CBOE Agreement, as amended, and the
performance of the obligations under the CBOE Agreement, as
amended; the ability to obtain governmental approvals and
rulings on or regarding the transaction on the proposed terms
and schedule; the failure of ICE or CBOT stockholders to approve
the merger; the risk that the businesses will not be integrated
successfully; disruption from the merger making it difficult to
maintain relationships with customers, employees or suppliers;
competition and its effect on pricing, spending and third-party
relationships and revenues; social and political conditions such
as war, political unrest or terrorism; and, general economic
conditions and normal business uncertainty. Additionally, the
historical data concerning stock price performance, earnings per
share and other operating results are not necessarily indicative
of future results. Additional risks and factors are identified
in ICEs filings with the SEC, including ICEs Annual
Report on
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2006, as filed with the SEC
on February 26, 2007 and ICEs Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended March 31, 2007, as filed with the SEC
on May 4, 2007. You should not place undue reliance on
forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date of
this Proxy Statement. Except for any obligations to disclosure
material information under the Federal securities laws, ICE
undertakes no obligation to publicly update any forward-looking
statements to reflect events or circumstances after the date of
this Proxy Statement.
OTHER
INFORMATION
The information concerning CBOT and the Proposed CME Merger
contained herein has been taken from, or is based upon, publicly
available documents on file with the SEC and other publicly
available information. As ICE was not involved in the
preparation of such documents, ICE has assumed that the publicly
available information is accurate and complete, and that
therefore the statements and information relating to CBOT and
the Proposed CME Merger contained in this Proxy Statement are
complete and accurate. Accordingly, ICE does not take any
responsibility for the accuracy or completeness of such
information or for any failure by CBOT to disclose events that
may have occurred and may affect the significance or accuracy of
any such information.
Pursuant to
Rule 14a-5
promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended, reference is made to the joint proxy
statement/prospectus included in the Revised CME/CBOT
S-4 for
information concerning the CME Merger Agreement, the Proposed
CME Merger, regulatory approvals, financial information
regarding CME, CBOT and the proposed combination of CME and
CBOT, the proposals to be voted upon at the Special Stockholders
Meeting and Special Members Meeting, the Shares, the beneficial
ownership of Shares by certain owners, other information
concerning CBOTs management, the procedures for submitting
proposals for consideration at the next annual meeting of
stockholders of CBOT and certain other matters
17
regarding CBOT and the Special Stockholders Meeting and Special
Members Meeting. ICE assumes no responsibility for the accuracy
or completeness of any such information.
Except as described herein, ICE is not aware of any other matter
to be considered at the Special Stockholders Meeting or the
Special Members Meeting. Should other proposals be brought
before the Special Stockholders Meeting, the persons named on
the BLUE proxy card will abstain from voting on such proposals
unless such proposals adversely affect the interests of ICE as
determined by ICE in its sole discretion, in which event such
persons will vote on such proposals in their discretion.
EVEN IF YOU HAVE ALREADY SENT A PROXY CARD TO CBOT OR TO CBOT
SUB, YOU HAVE EVERY RIGHT TO CHANGE YOUR VOTE. ONLY YOUR
LATEST-DATED PROXY COUNTS. VOTE AGAINST THE
PROPOSED CME MERGER BY VOTING AGAINST EACH
PROPOSAL TO BE CONSIDERED AT THE SPECIAL STOCKHOLDERS
MEETING AND AGAINST EACH PROPOSAL TO BE
CONSIDERED AT THE SPECIAL MEMBERS MEETING.
INSTRUCTIONS FOR CBOT STOCKHOLDERS. CBOT
STOCKHOLDERS CAN VOTE OVER THE INTERNET OR PHONE BY FOLLOWING
THE INSTRUCTIONS ON THE ENCLOSED PROXY OR BY SIGNING,
DATING AND RETURNING THE ENCLOSED BLUE PROXY CARD TO US IN THE
ENCLOSED POSTAGE PAID ENVELOPE AS SOON AS POSSIBLE. PLEASE
NOTE THAT TO VOTE BY INTERNET OR PHONE YOU WILL NEED TO
HAVE YOUR PROXY CARD AVAILABLE, AS YOU WILL NEED THE INDIVIDUAL
CONTROL NUMBER ASSIGNED TO YOU AND APPEARING ON EACH CARD.
SIGNING, DATING AND RETURNING THE BLUE PROXY CARD WILL REVOKE
ANY VOTE YOU HAVE PREVIOUSLY MADE. IF YOU HAVE ALREADY VOTED TO
APPROVE THE PROPOSED CME MERGER, YOU CAN ALSO REVOKE YOUR VOTE
BY VOTING AGAINST ON ANOTHER PROXY CARD DELIVERED TO
US OR TO CBOT OR BY VOTING AGAINST BY USING THE
INSTRUCTIONS ON YOUR PROXY CARDS TO VOTE BY TELEPHONE OR
INTERNET.
INSTRUCTIONS FOR CBOT MEMBERS. IF YOU HAVE ALREADY
VOTED TO APPROVE THE CBOT CLASS B APPROVALS, YOU CAN CHANGE
YOUR VOTE AT ANY TIME BEFORE YOUR PROXY IS VOTED AT THE SPECIAL
MEMBERS MEETING. IF YOU ARE THE RECORD HOLDER OF YOUR MEMBERSHIP
INTERESTS, YOU CAN DO THIS IN ONE OF THREE WAYS. FIRST, YOU CAN
SEND CBOT A WRITTEN NOTICE STATING THAT YOU WOULD LIKE TO REVOKE
YOUR PROXY. SECOND, YOU CAN COMPLETE AND SUBMIT A NEW VALID
PROXY BEARING A LATER DATE BY MAIL OR BY FOLLOWING THE TELEPHONE
OR INTERNET VOTING INSTRUCTION PROVIDED BY CBOT. THIRD, YOU
CAN ATTEND THE SPECIAL MEMBERS MEETING AND VOTE IN PERSON. IF
YOU CHOOSE TO SEND A WRITTEN NOTICE OR TO MAIL A NEW PROXY, YOU
MUST SUBMIT YOUR NOTICE OF REVOCATION OR NEW PROXY TO CBOT C/O
GEORGESON INC., WALL STREET STATION, P.O. BOX 1100, NEW YORK, NY
10269-0646,
AND IT MUST BE RECEIVED PRIOR TO THE SPECIAL MEMBERS MEETING.
WHETHER OR NOT YOU INTEND TO ATTEND THE SPECIAL STOCKHOLDERS
MEETING OR THE SPECIAL MEMBERS MEETING, YOUR PROMPT ACTION IS
IMPORTANT. MAKE YOUR VIEWS CLEAR TO CBOTS BOARD OF
DIRECTORS BY VOTING AGAINST EACH PROPOSAL AND,
IF YOU ARE A CBOT STOCKHOLDER, SIGNING, DATING AND RETURNING THE
ENCLOSED BLUE PROXY CARD TODAY.
YOUR VOTE IS IMPORTANT, NO MATTER HOW MANY OR HOW FEW SHARES OR
CBOT MEMBERSHIP INTERESTS YOU OWN.
IntercontinentalExchange, Inc.
June 12, 2007
18
IMPORTANT
VOTING INFORMATION
1. If your Shares are held in your own name, please vote
today by following the instructions for telephone or Internet
voting on the enclosed BLUE proxy card or by signing, dating and
returning it to ICE,
c/o Innisfree,
in the postage-paid envelope provided.
2. If your Shares are held in street-name, only
your broker or bank can vote your Shares and only upon receipt
of your specific instructions. If your Shares are held in
street-name, you may deliver your voting
instructions by phone or Internet by following the directions
appearing on the enclosed BLUE proxy card, or by returning the
BLUE proxy card in the postage paid envelope provided.
3. If you are a CBOT Stockholder who has already submitted
the WHITE proxy card you received from CBOT, it is not too late
to change your vote simply sign, date and return the
BLUE proxy card. Only your latest dated proxy will be counted.
You can also revoke any earlier vote by delivering another proxy
card voting AGAINST to CBOT or by voting
AGAINST using the telephone or Internet instructions
provided.
4. Only CBOT stockholders of record on May 29, 2007
are entitled to vote at the Special Stockholders Meeting. We
urge each CBOT Stockholder to ensure that the holder of record
of his or her Share(s) signs, dates, and returns the enclosed
BLUE proxy card as soon as possible.
5. Only the CBOT Members of record on May 29, 2007 are
entitled to vote at the Special Members Meeting. If you have
already submitted a proxy for the Special Members Meeting, you
may change your vote at any time before your proxy is voted at
the Special Members Meeting. If you are the record holder of
your membership interests, you can do this in one of three ways.
First, you can send CBOT a written notice stating that you would
like to revoke your proxy. Second, you can complete and submit a
new valid proxy bearing a later date by mail or by telephone or
Internet. Third, you can attend the Special Members Meeting and
vote in person. Attendance at the Special Members Meeting will
not in and of itself constitute revocation of a proxy. If you
choose to send a written notice or to mail a new proxy, you must
submit your notice of revocation or new proxy to CBOT
c/o Georgeson
Inc., Wall Street Station, P.O. Box 1100, New York, NY
10269-0646,
and it must be received prior to the Special Members Meeting.
If you have any questions or require any assistance in voting
your Shares or membership interests, please contact:
501 Madison Avenue, 20th Floor
New York, New York 10022
Stockholders Call Toll Free: at
(877) 800-5187
Banks and Brokers Call Collect:
(212) 750-5833
THE ICE PROPOSAL DESCRIBED IN THIS PROXY STATEMENT MAY
BECOME THE SUBJECT OF A REGISTRATION STATEMENT FILED WITH THE
SEC. INVESTORS AND SECURITY HOLDERS ARE ADVISED TO READ THIS
DOCUMENT AND ALL OTHER APPLICABLE DOCUMENTS IF AND WHEN THEY
BECOME AVAILABLE BECAUSE THEY WILL INCLUDE IMPORTANT
INFORMATION. INVESTORS AND SECURITY HOLDERS MAY OBTAIN A FREE
COPY OF ANY DOCUMENTS FILED BY ICE WITH THE SEC AT THE
SECS WEBSITE (www.sec.gov) OR BY DIRECTING SUCH REQUESTS
TO INNISFREE, 501 MADISON AVENUE, NEW YORK, NEW YORK 10022, AT
(877)
800-5187.
19
SCHEDULE I
INFORMATION
CONCERNING DIRECTORS, OFFICERS AND
OTHER
POTENTIAL PARTICIPANTS OF ICE
|
|
1.
|
Directors,
Executive Officers and Other Potential Participants of
ICE.
|
The following table sets forth the name, current business
address, current business telephone number and position or
offices of each director and executive officer of ICE and each
other employee of ICE that may be a potential participant in the
solicitation. Unless otherwise indicated, the current business
address of each person is 2100 RiverEdge Parkway, Atlanta,
Georgia 30328 and the current business telephone number is
(770) 857-4700.
PARTICIPANTS
|
|
|
Name, Citizenship
|
|
|
and Current Business Address
|
|
Title
|
|
Charles R. Crisp
|
|
Director
|
Jean-Marc Forneri
|
|
Director
|
Fred W. Hatfield
|
|
Director
|
Terrence F. Martell
|
|
Director
|
Sir Robert Reid
|
|
Director
|
Frederic V. Salerno
|
|
Director
|
Richard L. Sandor, Ph.D.
|
|
Director
|
Frederick W. Schoenhut
|
|
Director
|
Jeffrey C. Sprecher
|
|
Chairman and Chief Executive
Officer
|
Judith A. Sprieser
|
|
Director
|
Vincent Tese
|
|
Director
|
Charles A. Vice
|
|
President and Chief Operating
Officer
|
David S. Goone
|
|
Senior Vice President, Chief
Strategic Officer
|
Scott A. Hill
|
|
Senior Vice President, Chief
Financial Officer
|
Edwin D. Marcial
|
|
Senior Vice President, Chief
Technology Officer
|
Johnathan H. Short
|
|
Senior Vice President, General
Counsel and Corporate Secretary
|
Richard V. Spencer
|
|
Vice Chairman
|
Kelly L. Loeffler
|
|
Vice President, Investor Relations
and Corporate Communications
|
Andrew J. Surdykowski
|
|
Vice President, Assistant General
Counsel
|
Thomas W. Farley
|
|
President and Chief Operation
Officer, NYBOT
|
David J. Peniket
|
|
President and Chief Operating
Officer, ICE Futures
|
20
March 15, 2007
CBOT Holdings, Inc.
141 West Jackson Boulevard
Chicago, Illinois
60604-2929
|
|
Attention: |
Charles P. Carey
|
Chairman of the Board of Directors
Jackie Clegg
Larry G. Gerdes
Special Transaction Committee of the Board of Directors
James P. McMillin
Non-Exercise Right Members Committee
Bernard W. Dan
Chief Executive Officer
Dear Sirs and Madam,
On behalf of Intercontinental Exchange, Inc. (ICE)
and its Board of Directors, I am pleased to submit this proposal
to combine ICE with CBOT Holdings, Inc. (CBOT
Holdings) in an industry-defining merger. Our proposed
transaction will create the most comprehensive derivatives
exchange in the world, preserve the proud heritage of the
Chicago Board of Trade (CBOT), and promote
innovation and competition in the domestic and global
derivatives markets. From the perspective of shareholders and
CBOT Holdings trading community, this combination will
generate superior value immediately and in the longer term.
Consideration
We propose a transaction in which each share of CBOT Holdings
Class A common stock will be exchanged for 1.42 shares
of ICE Class A common stock. Based on the closing stock
price of ICE as of March 14, 2007, our proposal represents
a price per CBOT Holdings Class A share of $187.34. This
price represents a premium to CBOT Holdings current price
of 12.8%, and a premium to CBOT Holdings closing price on
October 16, 2006, the day prior to the public announcement
of CBOT Holdings intended combination with Chicago
Mercantile Exchange Holdings, Inc. (CME), of 39.3%.
In addition to the upfront premium, our proposal allows CBOT
Holdings shareholders to share in the substantial
combination benefits we believe are available to the combined
ICE and CBOT Holdings. The proposed exchange ratio will result
in CBOT Holdings Class A shareholders owning approximately
51.5% of the combined company. Based upon our review of
publicly-available information on CBOT Holdings, we estimate
over $240 million per annum of combination benefits, on a
pre-tax basis, would be realizable through the combination of
our two companies. We are confident we could identify additional
benefits once we have had the opportunity to undertake due
diligence and interact with your management.
We note that the merger agreement with CME Holdings includes a
cash election of up to $3 billion for CBOT Holdings
shareholders in lieu of shares. Should you feel that a cash
alternative is important to your shareholders, we would be
pleased to explore this option and have access to significant
financing sources should this be required.
A-1
Strategic
rationale
A merger of our two companies is a unique opportunity to create
a leading derivatives trading platform across a broad spectrum
of futures and options products, incorporating our complementary
positions in agricultural commodities and leading capabilities
in interest rates, energy, gold and silver, as well as other
financial contracts such as equity indices and foreign exchange
pairs. The combined entity would operate regulated exchanges in
the U.S., Europe, and Asia and also support the global
over-the-counter (OTC) derivatives market.
Through our recent purchase of the New York Board of Trade
(NYBOT), ICE operates a wholly-owned clearinghouse,
which will serve as an integrated platform for the clearing of
our combined exchanges transactions over time. ICE will
also contribute its world-class trading platform. Our technology
provides global accessibility and integrated capabilities for
trading futures, options on futures, and bilateral and cleared
OTC markets. We believe that our market-leading capabilities in
supporting OTC trading can be extended to CBOT Holdings
marketplace. Finally, the combined group will enjoy significant
economies of scale and scope in technology, marketing, and
customer connectivity.
Chicago
Board of Trades heritage and Chicago home
We recognize that, for nearly 160 years, the Chicago Board
of Trade has been a major Chicago institution and has anchored
the citys position as one of the worlds leading
financial centers. CBOTs history of innovation and growth
is unparalleled in the industry. We wish to preserve and enhance
this market position and legacy rather than to subsume it under
a larger organization. Therefore, we propose that the corporate
headquarters of the combined entity will be CBOTs landmark
building in Chicago. In addition, we intend to retain the
Chicago Board of Trade name and leverage it to create a new
brand identity for our regulated futures exchanges in New York,
London and Dublin.
Benefits
to CBOTs trading community
We believe that the creation of a global and integrated
agricultural commodities marketplace, the ability to trade
energy
side-by-side
with a variety of correlated agricultural products, and the
addition of NYBOTs financial contracts to CBOTs
interest rate and equity index products will promote liquidity
and trading opportunities in futures and options products both
on the trading floor and through electronic trading.
As evidenced by our acquisition of NYBOT, we have made a
significant commitment to our open-auction members and believe
that they provide an important source of liquidity for our
markets. Our proposal contemplates a substantial commitment to
support continued open-auction trading operations in CBOTs
building, as it becomes our global headquarters.
Governance
and management
We believe the board of directors of the combined company should
draw representatives from current CBOT Holdings directors in
addition to continuing ICE directors, and we look forward to
discussing CBOT Holdings board representation in the new entity
with you.
We envision ongoing and important roles for the key members of
current management of CBOT Holdings, and undertake to form a
management group for the combined company taken from the best
elements of each of our teams. I would retain the role of Chief
Executive Officer and look forward to discussing with the Chief
Executive Officer of CBOT Holdings the future roles in the
combined company for him and his management team.
Combination
benefits
As noted above, we believe that the merger of CBOT Holdings and
ICE offers significant combination benefits. Our wholly owned
clearing platform will allow us to internalize the clearing
services CBOT currently receives from CME, assuming your
clearing agreement with CME is terminated in January 2009. By
moving current CBOT electronic trading to the ICE platform, we
will be able to decrease technology expense and
A-2
improve efficiency. We also believe significant opportunities
exist to rationalize redundant general and administrative
expenses when we consolidate operations currently conducted in
Atlanta and New York into the Chicago headquarters of the
combined group. We estimate that these expense and clearing
savings would exceed $190 million on a full run-rate basis
by January, 2009.
We believe that there are also significant opportunities to
increase both the revenues and growth rate of the combined group
by providing a single access point to multiple complementary
products. The ability of customers to cross-margin positions in
the combined product suite and in cleared OTC products will
lower friction costs and increase trading activity. Further, we
believe that there are substantial revenue opportunities in
supporting the OTC markets that surround CBOTs existing
products. Finally, the financial opportunity associated with
preserving and growing elements of CBOTs traditional
product franchise, such as the precious metals contracts which
we understand may be scheduled for termination, is significant.
We estimate that these additional revenue opportunities would
exceed $50 million on a full run-rate basis within
18 months of closing.
ICE has the highest rate of growth and highest profit margin of
any company in our industry. This performance has been achieved
both organically and through acquisitions. We have a proven
track record in optimizing the performance of the companies that
we have acquired, and have created significant value for the
former owners and other stakeholders of companies with which we
have combined. We are confident that our combined management
team will integrate our two companies in such a way as to
maximize the benefits for all our stakeholders.
Structure
and Merger Agreement
We have studied the terms of the CME merger agreement and,
outside of the changes necessary to implement the matters
outlined in our proposal, we are prepared to enter into a form
of merger agreement with you on similar terms. However, subject
to the implementation of the other terms of our proposal, we are
also amenable to exploring a transaction structure which we
believe would facilitate preservation of your members CBOE
Exercise Rights.
Conditions,
approvals and other matters
Our board of directors has unanimously approved the submission
of this proposal. Any definitive transaction between us,
however, would be subject to final approvals by our board as
well as our shareholders.
We have based our proposal on publicly-available information,
and our proposal is subject to completion of a confirmatory due
diligence review of CBOT Holdings, which would include
discussions with your senior management. We are available to
commence our due diligence review immediately, and we are
confident that, given our knowledge of your business and your
cooperation, we can complete our review and be in a position to
execute a definitive transaction agreement within one week. We
are also prepared to give you and your representatives access to
non-public information relating to ICE to satisfy your due
diligence requirements. We are prepared to enter into a
confidentiality agreement with CBOT Holdings that is no less
favorable to CBOT Holdings than the one it entered into with CME.
Given the complementary nature of the products traded on CBOT,
NYBOT and ICE, we do not anticipate regulatory issues associated
with our proposed merger. In fact, we believe that the futures
industry and antitrust regulators will embrace the creation of a
strong derivatives group to protect and enhance industry
competition and innovation. We believe that a merger between
CBOT Holdings and CME Holdings represents a significant
concentration of market power, in particular in such areas as
equity index products, interest rate futures, technology and
clearing. The alternative transaction we are proposing would be
strongly pro-competitive and would benefit our mutual customers
as well as our respective shareholders.
This letter is not intended to create or constitute any legally
binding obligation, liability or commitment by us regarding the
proposed transaction, and, other than any confidentiality
agreement we may enter into with you, there will be no legally
binding contract or agreement between us regarding the proposed
transaction
A-3
unless and until a definitive merger agreement is executed. We
believe that the proposed transaction could close in the third
quarter of 2007.
While the CME transaction represents a sale of the company, our
proposal is truly a merger that is intended to preserve the
culture and heritage of the Chicago Board of Trade. We believe
our proposal is superior, from both a financial and strategic
perspective, to the CME proposal and is capable of consummation
without material regulatory impediments.
We and our financial advisors, Morgan Stanley, and our legal
advisors, Sullivan & Cromwell LLP, are prepared to
move forward immediately with this proposal. We believe that our
proposal presents a compelling opportunity for our companies,
our industry, and our customers, and we look forward to your
prompt response.
Sincerely,
Jeffrey C. Sprecher
Chairman & Chief Executive Officer
IntercontinentalExchange, Inc.
A-4
ANNEX B
April 20, 2007
CBOT Holdings, Inc.
141 West Jackson Boulevard
Chicago, Illinois
60604-2929
|
|
Attention: |
Charles P. Carey
Chairman of the Board of Directors
|
Jackie Clegg
Larry G. Gerdes
Special Transaction Committee of the Board of Directors
James P. McMillin
Non-Exercise Right Members Committee
Bernard W. Dan
Chief Executive Officer
Dear Sirs and Madam,
At your and your legal counsels request, we are pleased to
clarify our proposal to combine IntercontinentalExchange, Inc.
(ICE) with CBOT Holdings, Inc. (CBOT
Holdings) in an industry-defining merger. We continue to
believe that a combination of ICE and CBOT Holdings represents a
transaction that is superior, from both a financial and
strategic perspective, to a transaction with CME Holdings Inc.
(CME).
Our evaluation of Board of Trade of the City of Chicago (the
Chicago Board of Trade or CBOT) and CBOT
Holdings over the past four weeks has increased our enthusiasm
for a combination of our two companies. A combination of ICE and
CBOT Holdings would create one of the largest and most diverse
derivatives exchanges in the world and a leader in trading
technology. Combining CBOTs historic presence in Chicago
and its emerging initiatives in Asia with ICEs significant
European presence would uniquely position the combined company
to capitalize on the tremendous opportunities that exist in the
global derivatives industry. Our due diligence process, which
allowed us to work closely with your strong management team,
confirmed our high regard for the company you have built and
bolstered our confidence in the considerable value that can be
created through a combination. In addition, we feel our initial
estimate of the realizable benefits in a combination of
$240 million per annum before tax remains conservative and
achievable, offering significant value creation potential to the
combined companys shareholders.
Consideration
At this time, ICE is confirming our proposed merger
consideration valued at an exchange ratio of 1.42 ICE shares for
each CBOT Holdings share. However, we also appreciate the
dynamic nature of the current situation, and we are prepared to
take additional steps to maintain the superiority of our offer.
As a result of the combination of our two companies, the
stockholders of CBOT Holdings immediately prior to the merger
would retain approximately 51.5% of the outstanding shares of
the combined company.
You have told us that you will continue your due diligence on
ICE through April 27th, and we are fully committed to
support your efforts.
B-1
Based on the closing stock price of ICE as of today, our
proposal represents a price per CBOT Holdings Class A share
of $190.04. This price represents a premium to CBOT
Holdings closing price on October 16, 2006, the day
prior to the public announcement of CBOT Holdings intended
combination with the CME, of 41.3%. Our proposal also represents
a premium to the CME proposal of 13.7% or approximately
$1.2 billion.
In addition to the significant upfront premium our offer
represents, our proposal also allows CBOT Holdings
shareholders to own equity in a company whose management has
delivered, since ICE was taken public, shareholder returns that
are 371% above the return on CME shares over the same period.
CBOT Holdings shareholders would also share in the substantial
combination benefits we believe are available to the combined
ICE and CBOT Holdings.
Integration
We have spent significant additional time and resources refining
our plan for integrating our two businesses. The due diligence
process has allowed us to assess the scale and scope of
CBOTs technological and operational requirements in the
event that, as expected, we would terminate both the clearing
and technology agreements with the CME and AEMS, respectively,
at the earliest opportunity in order to maximize the benefits to
our combined shareholders. Through the ICE technology platform
and the New York Clearing Corporation, we have significant
capabilities and capacity available to support the needs of
CBOTs business, as they are today and as they grow and
develop over time.
As we have discussed with your management team over the prior
weeks, we are confident in our ability to scale our clearing
operations to accommodate the trading volumes of CBOT and to
transition trading to the ICE platform on a timetable consistent
with realizing the synergies identified in our proposal. To be
clear, we appreciate the magnitude of the integration exercise,
its impact on trading members and customers, and the importance
to the prospects of the combined company of ensuring the
integration process occurs seamlessly. We also note the
extensive experience and industry knowledge within CBOTs
staff arising from your earlier transitions, which adds to our
available resources and increases our confidence in our ability
to manage this integration.
Combination
benefits
As we have discussed with your management team, we believe that
the merger of CBOT Holdings and ICE offers significant
combination benefits. We have verified our wholly- owned
clearing platform will allow us to internalize the clearing
services CBOT currently receives from CME, beginning in January
2009. By moving current CBOT electronic trading to the ICE
platform, we will be able to decrease technology expense and
improve efficiency. We have also verified opportunities to
rationalize redundant general and administrative expenses when
we consolidate operations into the Chicago headquarters of the
combined group. We estimate that these expense and clearing
savings would exceed $190 million per annum on a full
run-rate basis by January 2009.
Our work over the past four weeks has also increased our
confidence in the substantial opportunities available to
increase both the revenues and growth rate of the combined
group. We are confident that providing a single access point to
multiple complementary products for all of the combined
companys customers will result in meaningful revenue
growth. Further, ICEs unparalleled OTC capabilities offer
an ability to extend our business to support OTC trading in the
markets that surround CBOTs existing products. We estimate
that these additional revenue opportunities would provide
operating profit in excess of $50 million per annum on a
full run-rate basis within 18 months of closing.
Governance
The board of directors of the combined company would draw
representatives from both companies. We propose that the board
be comprised of 16 members, 11 of whom would be drawn from the
ICE board of directors and five of whom would be drawn from
current or former CBOT members, officers and directors. We
propose that those five CBOT Holdings representatives consist of
the two current independent directors on the CBOT Holdings board
that are not CBOT members as well as three other persons who are
either past or
B-2
present CBOT members, directors or officers selected by ICE,
subject to the approval of CBOT Holdings. If any of those five
CBOT Holdings representatives leaves the board of the combined
company prior to the 2010 annual meeting of stockholders, we
would propose that ICE would select their replacement from among
current or former CBOT members, officers or directors, subject
to the approval of a majority of the remaining CBOT Holdings
representatives.
Management
While we are highly confident in the abilities of our
organization and our personnel, we were pleased to confirm our
view that there is a deep reservoir of talent and experience
within CBOTs management team and staff which would be
extremely valuable to the successful execution of our
integration plans. We expect to preserve and leverage this
expertise going forward rather than dismantle this valuable
Chicago-based team.
We envision ongoing and important roles for key members of
current management of CBOT and would look to form a management
group for the combined company taken from the best elements of
each of our teams. I would retain the role of Chief Executive
Officer of the parent company and look forward to further
discussing with you the future roles in the combined company for
your management team.
Benefits
to the Trading Community and Members Rights
We believe that the creation of a global and integrated
agricultural commodities marketplace, the ability to trade
energy
side-by-side
with a variety of correlated agricultural products, and the
addition of NYBOTs financial contracts to CBOTs
interest rate and equity index products will promote liquidity
and trading opportunities in futures and options products both
on the trading floor and through electronic trading.
We have reflected in our merger proposal the significant
commitments we are willing to make to ensure the continuation of
the rights and privileges available to the members of the CBOT.
Our proposal commits us to provide CBOT members with the same
rights that are proposed to be made available to them under the
CME merger, except that with respect to new products, our
proposal provides that CBOT will be the exclusive platform for
listing and trading all new U.S. grain products,
U.S. interest rate products and U.S. equity indices
(other than those published by Frank Russell or the New York
Stock Exchange). In addition, neither ICE nor any of its
subsidiaries would trade products that, as of the date of our
merger agreement, are traded on the CBOTs open outcry
exchange or any electronic trading system maintained by CBOT.
Structure
and Merger Agreement
Under our proposal, ICE would merge with and into CBOT Holdings,
with CBOT Holdings continuing as the surviving company. We
continue to believe that this structure better protects the CBOT
Full Members CBOE exercise right. All of the outstanding
shares of Class A Common Stock of CBOT Holdings (CBOT
Common Stock) would remain outstanding and each
outstanding share of Common Stock of ICE would be converted into
shares of CBOT Common Stock. In addition, all of the outstanding
shares of Class B Common Stock of CBOT Holdings would be
repurchased immediately prior to the merger. Based upon the
direction of the merger described above, each ICE shareholder
would receive .7042 of a share of CBOT Common Stock for each ICE
share currently held, the reciprocal of our proposed exchange
ratio of 1.42.
Due
Diligence
We hereby confirm that ICE has completed its due diligence
review.
Conditions,
Approvals and Other Matters
Our board of directors has unanimously authorized the submission
of these clarifications to our proposal. Any definitive
transaction between us, however, would be subject to final
approvals by our board as well as our shareholders.
B-3
We believe our respective counsel have confirmed that our
proposed merger presents no regulatory challenges from the
standpoint of antitrust or other regulators. We believe the
prompt acceptance of our proposal would allow for a closing in
the third quarter of 2007.
This letter is not intended to create or constitute any legally
binding obligation, liability or commitment by us regarding the
proposed transaction, and, other than the confidentiality
agreement we have entered into with you, there will be no
legally binding contract or agreement between us regarding the
proposed transaction unless and until a definitive merger
agreement is executed. We have enclosed with our proposal a
clarified merger agreement draft reflecting the terms of our
proposal.
As I have stated in previous communications, I believe that our
proposal presents a compelling opportunity for our companies,
our employees, our industry, and our customers, and we look
forward to your prompt response. My team and I appreciate the
amount of time and effort the management, Special Transaction
Committee and Board of CBOT Holdings have spent in evaluating
our proposal.
We continue to believe our offer is superior to the CME
proposal. Again, we appreciate the dynamic nature of the current
situation, and we are prepared to take additional steps to
maintain the superiority of our offer. We look forward to
discussing the terms of our proposal with you and your advisors
as soon as is practicable.
Sincerely,
Jeffrey C. Sprecher
Chairman & Chief Executive Officer
IntercontinentalExchange, Inc.
B-4
ANNEX C
April 27, 2007
CBOT Holdings, Inc.
141 West Jackson Boulevard
Chicago, Illinois
60604-2929
|
|
Attention: |
Bernard W. Dan
Chief Executive Officer
|
Dear Bernie:
I am writing to you to clarify certain topics regarding the
potential integration of IntercontinentalExchange, Inc.
(ICE) and CBOT Holdings, Inc. (CBOT
Holdings).
First, I want to reiterate our continuing and strong interest in
combining our two companies upon the terms described most
recently in my letter to you and members of your board of
directors dated April 20, 2007. We are confident that our
proposal is superior to the CME Holdings Inc. (CME)
proposal, and, as I stated to you in that letter, ICE is
prepared to take additional steps to maintain the superiority of
our proposal.
I want to communicate our thanks to you for your management
teams efforts over the past four weeks in working with my
management group to review and discuss our plan for the
integration of our two businesses. We have been impressed by the
quality and professionalism of the CBOT Holdings technology
team, and believe the discussions were constructive and helpful.
Your team has appropriately focused on the combined
companys ability to move the current trading and clearing
activities associated with the CBOTs business onto our
wholly-owned platforms. We noted in our conversations that your
team remains focused on our ability to accomplish this
transition by January of 2009, the earliest expiration of the
AEMS technology and CME clearing agreements. I want to emphasize
to you that ICE is extremely confident this integration can take
place within that timeframe. We have also shared with your
management team our refined views of the capital expenditure and
operating costs we believe we will incur in order to enhance our
trading and clearing capabilities to support CBOTs
business. We see these investments as substantial and believe
the estimates are appropriately conservative.
The reasons for our confidence that the integration would be
accomplished in the required timeframe are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Previous ICE integration experience. We
appreciate the CBOT trading platform and scale of CBOTs
operations are larger and more diverse than the activities of
the exchanges we have previously acquired the NYBOT
and the International Petroleum Exchange. However, we do feel
our experience in integrating each of these businesses is
relevant when evaluating our ability to integrate CBOTs
trading. We integrated the NYBOT clearinghouse and successfully
launched electronic trading for NYBOTs most liquid
contracts within three weeks of the closing of the transaction.
As you are aware, the NYBOT, at the time of our acquisition, did
not have an electronic trading platform. We feel moving the CBOT
trading platform will be facilitated by the fact that CBOT and
its customers have existing, significant electronic trading
capabilities and infrastructure.
|
|
|
|
Timing of the last CBOT platform and clearing
moves. We understand that the movement of
clearing to the CME in 2003 was accomplished within
10 months (April, 2003 through January, 2004). We
understand that moving trading to
e-CBOT was
accomplished in one year (January, 2003 through January, 2004).
We also note that both moves were done concurrently. Given the
track record that
|
C-1
|
|
|
|
|
CBOT was able to accomplish these moves in under one year, we
feel confident that our 18 month integration timeframe is
readily achievable.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Previous CBOT integration exercises. The
functionality created by the CBOT during the platform moves in
2003 will be helpful in our integration. The recent platform
moves and lessons learned will eliminate the iterative process
that we understand took place during the 2003 move. We also
expect to benefit from the capabilities of many of the CBOT
personnel who participated in the last platform move.
|
|
|
|
Staff and culture. Unlike the previous CBOT
platform moves which were performed by vendors or third parties,
the integration of CBOT and ICE would be performed by the
combined companys own personnel. This will result in
faster and more efficient development and deployment times.
Lastly, from our brief interaction with your technology team, we
feel that our staff, systems and corporate cultures have many
common elements that will contribute to a rapid and efficient
integration process.
|
Finally, while we feel it is a remote possibility, I wanted to
explore the implications of our estimate of the timing of the
integration proving to be incorrect. We understand that CBOT may
extend the existing clearing services agreement with the CME for
a six month period beyond the first termination date of January,
2009 if CBOT is unable to engage another entity prepared and
able to provide services comparable to the clearing services
provided by CME on commercially reasonable terms. Consequently,
in the worst case, the combined company could extend clearing
services for a short period beyond January. In that
circumstance, the combined company would continue to compensate
CME at a reasonable, commercial rate. Given that current annual
clearing expenses are estimated to be approximately
$100 million in 2009, a delay of up to 6 months would
result in a modest additional cost and a slight delay in the
realization of clearing synergies. These two impacts would be
small in the context of the expected overall value of the
combination benefits and pro forma market capitalization of the
combined company.
I hope this additional information is helpful to you in your
continued evaluation of our proposal. My team and I are
available for additional discussion on this matter.
Sincerely,
Jeffrey C. Sprecher
Chairman & Chief Executive Officer
IntercontinentalExchange, Inc.
C-2
ANNEX D
June 12, 2007
CBOT Holdings, Inc.
141 West Jackson Boulevard
Chicago, Illinois
60604-2929
|
|
Attention: |
Charles P. Carey
Chairman of the Board of Directors
|
Jackie Clegg
Larry G. Gerdes
Special Transaction Committee of the Board of Directors
James P. McMillin
Non-Exercise Right Members Committee
Bernard W. Dan
Chief Executive Officer
Dear Sirs and Madam,
We are pleased to resubmit our proposal to combine
IntercontinentalExchange, Inc. (ICE) with CBOT
Holdings, Inc. (CBOT Holdings), together with a
revised form of merger agreement and related exhibits. We
continue to believe a combination of ICE and CBOT Holdings
represents a transaction that is superior, from both a financial
and strategic perspective, to CBOT Holdings stockholders and to
members of the Board of Trade of the City of Chicago, Inc.
(CBOT) when compared to the currently proposed
transaction with CME Holdings Inc. (CME).
Based on todays closing prices, the value of our offer
represents $211.55 per CBOT Holdings share. This calculation of
value per share does not include the additional consideration
offered to CBOT Full Members related to the treatment of the
CBOE Exercise Rights, which we calculate to be a minimum of an
additional $18.29 per CBOT Holdings share. The revised CME
proposal represents only $191.98 per CBOT Holdings share. Our
offer represents a 10.2% premium to the CME proposal and
represents over $1.0 billion of additional value to your
shareholders. We continue to believe the CME proposal is an
attempt to acquire the CBOT at a meaningful discount to its full
value.
We have included in our revised documentation a redacted version
of the proposal regarding the treatment of CBOE Exercise Rights
(the Exercise Rights). We have worked hard to arrive
at an agreement to resolve a dispute that has existed for many
years between CBOT Holdings and the Chicago Board Options
Exchange (CBOE). To the benefit of your Full Members
and stockholders, our proposed settlement, unlike the proposed
CME transaction, removes a great deal of uncertainty relating to
this contentious issue, delivers significant value for the
Exercise Rights, and provides an opportunity for liquidity to
CBOT members who would otherwise not seek liquidity for fear of
jeopardizing the value of their Exercise Rights. We have
committed our time and $332.75 million of our capital to
the resolution of this issue. In contrast, the CME promises only
limited funding for further litigation, despite the fact that
the CBOE Exercise Right may be deemed invalid as a result of CME
acquiring CBOT Holdings.
Beyond the value of the Exercise Rights settlement agreement to
the Full Members, we would like to also highlight an additional
implication of the CMEs proposal. Should this issue not be
resolved as part of a
D-1
CBOT Holdings merger, the ongoing dispute and litigation will
undoubtedly place significant demands on managements time
and attention going forward to the detriment of all shareholders.
Consideration
to Class A Stockholders
At this time, we are reconfirming our proposed exchange ratio of
1.42 ICE shares for each CBOT Holdings share.
Cash
Election
Many of your members and stockholders have requested that we
consider including cash consideration as an alternative to ICE
shares to allow for diversification of their investment
holdings. Our revised proposal includes an election, at the
option of each stockholder, to receive cash consideration in an
amount equivalent to the value implied by 1.42 ICE shares at the
time the CBOT Holdings merger with ICE closes. The total amount
of cash consideration in the transaction will be subject to a
maximum of $2.5 billion. CBOT Holdings stockholders who
elect to receive cash will receive the cash consideration,
subject to pro ration if demand for cash exceeds the maximum
cash available.
If no CBOT Holdings stockholder elects cash consideration, the
stockholders of CBOT Holdings will retain approximately 51.6% of
the outstanding shares of the combined company. If all CBOT
Holdings stockholders elect to receive cash, based on the
current value of ICE shares, CBOT Holdings stockholders will
receive approximately $47.12 cash per share and own 45.3% of the
combined company. If CBOT stockholders do not elect to receive
the full amount of cash available, ICE currently intends to use
any remaining cash to repurchase ICE shares after the closing of
a transaction.
Dividends
to Class A Stockholders
Our agreement provides for the ability of CBOT to pay
pre-closing dividends of $0.29 per share for the third and
fourth quarters of 2007 and a dividend for the first quarter of
2008 based on earnings during that period.
Integration
issues
As we outlined in a letter dated April 27th (attached
herein for your reference), we are extremely confident in our
ability to integrate our two businesses. We have a detailed
plan, including dates for specific deliverables and testing
requirements, under which we intend to execute the transition of
technology from the AEMS system to the ICE platform and the
transition of clearing from the CME Clearinghouse to our
U.S. clearing platform, now known as ICE Clear. In
particular, we have prepared detailed analyses relating to
technology and clearing requirements in order to support
CBOTs current and expected business volumes. For this and
other reasons we have discussed with you and your management
team, we continue to disagree strongly with your conclusion that
the integration of ICE and CBOT Holdings could not be
accomplished in an acceptable timeframe.
Furthermore, even if we were to encounter unexpected delays,
these could readily be addressed. We appreciate that the
termination dates for your outsourced technology and clearing
services may not align ideally for purposes of our planned
migration in January 2009, and that therefore some additional
flexibility in terms of extending one or both of these contracts
may be required. We have every reason to believe that such
flexibility, if needed, will be readily available.
As it relates to clearing, we understand that CBOT may extend
the existing clearing services agreement with the CME for a six
month period beyond the first termination date in January 2009
if CBOT is unable to engage another entity prepared and able to
provide comparable clearing services on commercially reasonable
terms. Consequently, in the worst case, we believe the combined
company would have access to clearing services through at least
the middle of 2009.
Given the importance of a competitive clearing solution to the
futures industry, we believe that the combined ICE/CBOT would
enjoy substantial support and cooperation from the clearing
firms in this
D-2
transition. Over the past few months, we have had many
discussions with important industry participants and with the
Futures Industry Association to confirm this point of view. We
encourage you to undertake similar discussions in order to
satisfy yourselves of this level of industry support.
In order to gain flexibility, if needed, regarding the timing of
the planned migration of your trading platform, we have recently
held discussions with senior management of NYSE Euronext, the
parent company of AEMS. Based on these discussions, we believe
that NYSE Euronext would be prepared to extend the AEMS
technology agreement, if necessary, on reasonable commercial
terms for the period reasonably required to facilitate the
migration of the CBOT trading platform and CBOT clearing onto
ICE platforms.
Although as indicated above we remain confident that we can
successfully integrate our two businesses within 18 months,
the flexibility to extend these deadlines would permit our two
businesses to be integrated even within the 24 months
projected by CBOT Holdings management.
Combination
benefits
By moving current CBOT electronic trading to the ICE platform,
we will be able to decrease technology expense and improve
efficiency. We have also verified opportunities to rationalize
redundant general and administrative expenses when we
consolidate operations into the Chicago headquarters of the
combined group. We continue to estimate that these expense and
clearing savings would exceed $190 million per annum on a
full run-rate basis by January 2009.
We are also confident that providing a single access point to
multiple complementary products for all of the combined
companys customers will result in meaningful revenue
growth. Further, ICEs unparalleled OTC capabilities offer
an ability to extend our business to support OTC trading in the
markets that surround CBOTs existing products. We estimate
that these additional revenue opportunities will provide
operating profit in excess of $60 million per annum on a
full run-rate basis within 18 months of closing.
We note that our estimate of combination benefits has been
consistent throughout this process, and we have attempted to
reflect the full value of the combination synergies in our
proposal to you. This differs from the CME, which has upwardly
revised its synergy estimate and exchange ratio offered to CBOT
Holdings stockholders only in response to our competing proposal.
Benefits
to the Trading Community and Members Rights
We believe that the creation of a global and integrated
agricultural commodities marketplace, the ability to trade
energy
side-by-side
with a variety of correlated agricultural products, and the
addition of NYBOTs financial contracts to CBOTs
interest rate and equity index products will promote liquidity
and trading opportunities in futures and options products both
on the trading floor and through electronic trading.
We have reflected in our merger proposal the significant
commitments we are willing to make to ensure the continuation of
the rights and privileges available to the members of the CBOT.
Our proposal commits us to provide CBOT members with the same
rights that are proposed to be made available to them under the
CME merger, except that with respect to new products, our
proposal provides that all new U.S. grain products,
U.S. interest rate products and U.S. equity indices
(other than those published by Frank Russell or the New York
Stock Exchange) will be listed and traded on CBOT. In addition,
neither ICE nor any of its subsidiaries would trade products
that, as of the date of our merger agreement, are traded on the
CBOTs open outcry exchange or any electronic trading
system maintained by CBOT.
Current CBOT B-1 and B-2 members would also benefit from pricing
protections on trading fees. Under the enhanced merger proposal,
CBOT trading fees for B-1 and B-2 members would generally not
increase from current levels prior to the 2011 Annual Meeting of
Stockholders and at least until the 2014 Annual Meeting of
Stockholders would generally benefit from discounts of 50% or
more from the lowest trading fees available to non-members.
D-3
Governance
As we have proposed already, the board of directors of the
combined company would draw representatives from both companies.
The board would be comprised of 16 members, 11 of whom would be
drawn from the ICE board of directors and five of whom would be
drawn from the current CBOT Holdings Board. We would propose
that Larry Gerdes and Jackie Clegg fill two of these five seats,
and that CBOT Holdings and ICE mutually agree on the three
remaining CBOT Holdings representatives.
Management
We continue to envision ongoing and important roles for key
members of current management of CBOT and would look to form a
management group for the combined company taken from the best
elements of each of our teams. In contrast to CMEs
integration plan, our proposal values the contribution of CBOT
staff in implementing the integration plan that we have outlined.
Due
Diligence
ICE does not require any additional due diligence.
Financing
ICE has arranged for financing from its lending institutions for
the full amount of cash required to fund the maximum cash
consideration contemplated in the merger, the payment of the
CBOE Exercise Right settlement amount and fees and expenses
related to the transaction.
Irrevocable
Offer;
Break-up
Fee
In order to assure CBOT Holdings stockholders and CBOT members
that the ICE proposal described in this letter will be available
should they vote down the CME transaction, we intend to deliver
a signed copy of the attached merger agreement to CBOT Holdings
prior to the July 9 special stockholders and members
meetings. We also intend to include with the signed agreement a
letter indicating that we cannot legally revoke our offer until
after the July 9 meeting, except in certain limited
circumstances. Our proposal also provides that ICE would pay for
the $294 million
break-up fee
and expenses payable to CME when CBOT Holdings enters into a
definitive merger agreement with ICE, subject to reimbursement
in certain circumstances if our merger with CBOT Holdings does
not close.
Dissenting
Proxy
If you proceed to ask CBOT Holdings stockholders and CBOT
members to approve a transaction with the CME without the
ability to consider our proposal, we intend to take steps to
encourage a rejection of the CME transaction by your
stockholders and members. ICE intends to file proxy materials
with the SEC that will permit us to communicate directly with
CBOT Holdings stockholders and CBOT members instructing them on
how to reject the proposed CME transaction. While we respect the
Board of CBOT Holdings, we feel strongly that our proposal
should have the opportunity to be considered by the CBOT
Holdings stockholders and CBOT members and believe that this is
currently the only way that will be possible.
Conditions,
Approvals and Other Matters
Our board of directors has unanimously authorized the submission
of this letter and the attached documents.
We believe our respective counsel have confirmed that our
proposed merger presents no regulatory challenges from the
standpoint of antitrust or other regulators. We believe the
prompt acceptance of our proposal would allow for a closing in
the second half of 2007.
This letter is not intended to create or constitute any legally
binding obligation, liability or commitment by us regarding the
proposed transaction, and, other than the confidentiality
agreement we have entered into
D-4
with you, there will be no legally binding contract or agreement
between us regarding the proposed transaction unless and until
we have delivered to you an executed definitive merger agreement
that has not been revoked in accordance with the terms under
which it has been delivered to you, and this merger agreement
has been countersigned by CBOT Holdings and CBOT and delivered
to us after the proposed CME transaction has been voted down by
CBOT Holdings stockholders.
We continue to believe our offer is superior to the CME proposal
and we appreciate your continued consideration of our proposal.
Sincerely,
Jeffrey C. Sprecher
Chairman & Chief Executive Officer
IntercontinentalExchange, Inc.
D-5
YOUR VOTE IS IMPORTANT
Please take a moment now to vote your shares of CBOT Holdings, Inc.
Class A Common Stock for the upcoming Special Meeting of Stockholders.
PLEASE REVIEW THE PROXY STATEMENT
AND VOTE TODAY IN ONE OF THREE WAYS:
1. |
|
Vote by Telephone Please call toll-free in the U.S. or Canada at
1-866-213-0686 , on a touch-tone telephone. If outside the U.S. or Canada, call
215-521-1341. Please follow the simple instructions. You will be required to provide the
unique control number printed below. |
OR
2. |
|
Vote by Internet Please access
https://www.proxyvotenow.com/bota, and follow the simple
instructions. Please note you must type an s after http. You will be required to provide
the unique control number printed below. |
You may vote by telephone or Internet 24 hours a day, 7 days a week.
Your telephone or Internet vote authorizes the named proxies to vote your shares in the same manner
as if you had marked, signed and returned a proxy card.
OR
3. |
|
Vote by Mail If you do not wish to vote by telephone or over the Internet, please
complete, sign, date and return the proxy card in the envelope provided, or mail to:
IntercontinentalExchange, Inc., c/o Innisfree M&A Incorporated, FDR Station, P.O. Box 5155,
New York, NY 10150-5155. |
6 TO VOTE BY MAIL PLEASE DETACH PROXY CARD HERE AND RETURN IN THE ENVELOPE PROVIDED 6
ICE STRONGLY RECOMMENDS A VOTE AGAINST EACH OF THE FOLLOWING PROPOSALS.
1. |
|
To adopt the Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of October 17, 2006, among CME, CBOT and
CBOT Sub, as amended as of December 20, 2006, May 11, 2007
and June 14, 2007 (as amended, the CME Merger
Agreement). |
o AGAINST o ABSTAIN o FOR
2. |
|
To approve an adjournment or postponement of the Special Stockholders Meeting, including if
necessary, to solicit additional proxies in favor of the adoption of the CME Merger Agreement
and the approval of the proposed CBOT/CME merger if there are not sufficient votes for that
proposal. |
o AGAINST o ABSTAIN o FOR
IN THEIR DISCRETION, THE PROXIES ARE AUTHORIZED TO VOTE UPON SUCH OTHER BUSINESS AS MAY
PROPERLY COME BEFORE THE SPECIAL STOCKHOLDERS MEETING OR ANY ADJOURNMENTS, POSTPONEMENTS OR
RESCHEDULINGS THEREOF ON BEHALF OF THE UNDERSIGNED.
Signature of Stockholder
Signature of Stockholder (if held jointly)
Please sign exactly as your name or names appear
hereon. If shares are held jointly, each
stockholder should sign. When signing as
attorney, executor, administrator, trustee or
guardian, please give full title as such. If a
corporation, please sign in full corporate name
by president or authorized officer. If a
partnership, please sign in partnership name by
authorized person.
PLEASE
SIGN, DATE AND RETURN THIS BLUE PROXY CARD PROMPTLY IN THE ENCLOSED
POSTAGE PAID ENVELOPE.
PLEASE VOTE TODAY!
SEE REVERSE
SIDE FOR THREE EASY WAYS TO VOTE.
TO VOTE BY MAIL PLEASE DETACH PROXY CARD HERE AND RETURN IN THE ENVELOPE PROVIDED 6
FORM OF BLUE PROXY CARD
CBOT HOLDINGS, INC.
SOLICITATION BY INTERCONTINENTALEXCHANGE, INC.
IN OPPOSITION TO THE SOLICITATION BY THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF CBOT
HOLDINGS, INC.
The undersigned, a holder of record of shares of Class A common stock, par value $0.001 per
share (the Shares), of CBOT Holdings, Inc. ( CBOT) acknowledges receipt of the Proxy Statement
of INTERCONTINENTALEXCHANGE, INC., dated June , 2007, and the undersigned revokes all prior
proxies delivered in connection with the special meeting of stockholders of CBOT (the Special
Stockholders Meeting) to approve the Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of October 17, 2006,
by and among Chicago Mercantile Exchange Holdings Inc., CBOT and Board of Trade of the City of
Chicago, Inc., as amended as of December 20, 2006 and May 11, 2007 (as amended, the CME Merger
Agreement) and all other matters related to the CME Merger Agreement including those set forth
below, and appoints Kelly L. Loeffler, Johnathan H. Short and Andrew J. Surdykowski, acting
individually or jointly, with full power of substitution, proxies for the undersigned to vote all
Shares which the undersigned would be entitled to vote at the Special Stockholders Meeting and any
adjournments, postponements or reschedulings thereof, and instructs said proxies to vote as
follows.
EXCEPT AS PROVIDED HEREIN, THIS PROXY WILL BE VOTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE SPECIFICATIONS
MADE. IF NO SPECIFICATIONS ARE MADE AND YOU HAVE SIGNED AND DATED THIS PROXY CARD, THIS PROXY WILL
BE VOTED AGAINST EACH OF THE PROPOSALS. THIS PROXY WILL REVOKE (OR BE USED BY THE PROXIES TO
REVOKE) ANY PRIOR PROXY DELIVERED IN CONNECTION WITH THE PROPOSALS LISTED BELOW TO THE EXTENT IT IS
VOTED AT THE SPECIAL STOCKHOLDERS MEETING AS STIPULATED BELOW.
BY EXECUTING THE BLUE PROXY CARD YOU ARE AUTHORIZING THE PERSONS NAMED AS PROXIES TO REVOKE
ALL PRIOR PROXIES ON YOUR BEHALF.
(continued and to be signed and dated on reverse)