As filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on December 9, 2009

Registration No. 333-[      ]

 

UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

 

Form S-1

 

REGISTRATION STATEMENT

UNDER

THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1933

 

CHS INC.

(EXACT NAME OF REGISTRANT AS SPECIFIED IN ITS CHARTER)

 

5150

(Primary Standard Industrial Classification Code Number)

 

 

Copy to:

David P. Swanson

Michael W. Clausman

Steven D. Shogren

Dorsey & Whitney LLP

50 South Sixth Street

Minneapolis, Minnesota 55402

(612) 340-2600

Fax (612) 340-8738

 

Approximate date of commencement of proposed sale to the public:  As soon as practicable after this registration statement becomes effective.

 

If any of the securities being registered on this Form are to be offered on a delayed or continuous basis pursuant to Rule 415 under the Securities Act of 1933 check the following box:  o

 

If this Form is filed to register additional securities for an offering pursuant to Rule 462(b) under the Securities Act, please check the following box and list the Securities Act registration statement number of the earlier effective registration statement for the same offering.  o

 

If this Form is a post-effective amendment filed pursuant to Rule 462(c) under the Securities Act, check the following box and list the Securities Act registration statement number of the earlier effective registration statement for the same offering.  o

 

If this Form is a post-effective amendment filed pursuant to Rule 462(d) under the Securities Act, check the following box and list the Securities Act registration statement number of the earlier effective registration statement for the same offering.  o

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)

 

CALCULATION OF REGISTRATION FEE

 

 

The Registrant hereby amends this Registration Statement on such date or dates as may be necessary to delay its effective date until the Registrant shall file a further amendment which specifically states that this Registration Statement shall thereafter become effective in accordance with Section 8(a) of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or until the Registration Statement shall become effective on such date as the Commission, acting pursuant to Section 8(a) of the Securities Act, may determine.

 

SUBJECT TO COMPLETION DATED DECEMBER 9, 2009

 

PROSPECTUS

          Shares

 

 

CHS Inc.

 

8% Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock

 

We are issuing 1,470,588 shares of our 8% Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock to redeem $37,000,000 of our “patrons’ equities.” The shares will be issued to redeem our outstanding patrons’ equities on a pro rata basis. Subject to the exceptions described below in “Plan of Distribution,” shares of preferred stock issued in redemption of the patrons’ equities will be issued only to non-individual active members who have conducted business with us during the past five years and whose pro rata share of the redemption amount is equal to or greater than $500. See “Membership in CHS and Authorized Capital — Patrons’ Equities” for a description of patrons’ equities and our annual pro rata redemptions of patrons’ equities. The amount of patrons’ equities that will be redeemed with each share of preferred stock issued will be $      which is the greater of $25.16 (equal to the $25.00 liquidation preference per share of preferred stock plus $0.16 of accumulated dividends from and including January 1, 2010 to and including January 29, 2010) or the closing price for one share of the preferred stock on January   , 2010. There will not be any cash proceeds from the issuance of the preferred stock. However, by issuing shares of preferred stock in redemption of patrons’ equities, we will make available for working capital purposes cash that otherwise would be used to redeem those patrons’ equities.

 

Holders of the preferred stock are entitled to receive cash dividends at the rate of $2.00 per share per year. Dividends are payable quarterly in arrears when, as and if declared on March 31, June 30, September 30 and December 31 of each year (each, a “payment date”), except that if a payment date is a Saturday, Sunday or legal holiday, the dividend is paid without interest on the next day that is not a Saturday, Sunday or legal holiday. Dividends payable on the preferred stock are cumulative. The preferred stock is subject to redemption and has the preferences described in this prospectus. The preferred stock is not convertible into any of our other securities and is non-voting except in certain limited circumstances.

 

The preferred stock is traded on the NASDAQ Global Select Market under the trading symbol “CHSCP.” On December 7, 2009, the closing price of the preferred stock was $28.09 per share.

 

Ownership of our preferred stock involves risks. See “Risk Factors” beginning on page 8.

 

We expect to issue the preferred stock on or about January 29, 2010.

 

Neither the Securities and Exchange Commission nor any state securities commission has approved or disapproved of these securities or determined if this prospectus is truthful or complete. Any representation to the contrary is a criminal offense.

 

CHS Inc.
5500 Cenex Drive
Inver Grove Heights, Minnesota 55077
(651) 355-6000

 

The date of this prospectus is           .

 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

 

 

You should rely only on the information contained or incorporated by reference in this prospectus. We have not authorized any other person to provide you with different or additional information. This prospectus does not constitute an offer to sell or the solicitation of an offer to buy any securities other than the securities to which it relates. We are not making an offer of these securities in any state where the offer is not permitted. The information in this prospectus is current as of the date on the front of this prospectus.

 

References in this prospectus, and the documents incorporated by reference in this prospectus, to “CHS,” “CHS Cooperatives,” “Cenex Harvest States Cooperatives,” the “Company,” “we,” “our” and “us” refer to CHS Inc., a Minnesota cooperative corporation, and its subsidiaries. We maintain a web site at http://www.chsinc.com. Information contained in our website does not constitute part of this prospectus.

 

All references to “preferred stock” in this prospectus are to our 8% Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock unless the context requires otherwise.

 

PROSPECTUS SUMMARY

Dividends		Holders of the preferred stock (which include both members and non-member third parties) are entitled to receive cash dividends at the rate of $2.00 per share per year when, as and if declared by our Board of Directors. Dividends are cumulative and are payable quarterly in arrears on March 31, June 30, September 30 and December 31 of each year (each, a “payment date”), except that if a payment date is a Saturday, Sunday or legal holiday, the dividend is paid without interest on the next day that is not a Saturday, Sunday or legal holiday.
Liquidation Rights		In the event of our liquidation, holders of the preferred stock are entitled to receive $25.00 per share plus all dividends accumulated and unpaid on the shares to and including the date of liquidation, subject, however, to the rights of any of our securities that rank senior or on parity with the preferred stock.
Rank		As to payment of dividends and as to distributions of assets upon the liquidation, dissolution or winding up of CHS, whether voluntary or involuntary, the preferred stock ranks prior to:
		• any patronage refund;
		• any other class or series of our capital stock designated by our Board of Directors as junior to the preferred stock; and
		• our common stock, if any.
		Shares of any class or series of our capital stock that are not junior to the preferred stock, rank equally with the preferred stock as to the payment of dividends and the distribution of assets.
Redemption at our Option		We may, at our option, redeem the preferred stock, in whole or from time to time in part, for cash at a price of $25.00 per share plus all dividends accumulated and unpaid on that share to and including the date of redemption. We have no current plan or intention to redeem the preferred stock.
Redemption at the Holder’s Option		In the event of a change in control initiated by our Board of Directors, holders of the preferred stock will have the right, for a period of 90 days from the date of the change in control, to require us to repurchase their shares of preferred stock at a price of $25.00 per share plus all dividends accumulated and unpaid on that share to and including the date of redemption. “Change in control” is defined in “Description of the Preferred Stock — Redemption at the Holder’s Option.”
No Exchange or Conversion Rights, No Sinking Fund		The preferred stock is not exchangeable for or convertible into any other shares of our capital stock or any other securities or property. The preferred stock is not subject to the operation of any purchase, retirement or sinking fund.

Voting Rights		Holders of the preferred stock do not have voting rights, except as required by applicable law; provided, that the affirmative vote of two-thirds of the outstanding preferred stock will be required to approve:
		• any amendment to our articles of incorporation or the resolutions establishing the terms of the preferred stock if the amendment adversely affects the rights or preferences of the preferred stock; or
		• the creation of any class or series of equity securities having rights senior to the preferred stock as to the payment of dividends or distribution of assets upon the liquidation, dissolution or winding up of CHS.
No Preemptive Rights		Holders of the preferred stock have no preemptive right to acquire shares of any class or series of our capital stock.
Trading		The preferred stock is listed on the NASDAQ Global Select Market under the symbol “CHSCP.”
Comparison of Rights		Holders of the preferred stock have different rights from those of holders of patrons’ equities. See “Comparison of Rights of Holders of Patrons’ Equities and Rights of Holders of Preferred Stock” below.
Risk Factors		Ownership of our preferred stock involves risks. See “Risk Factors” on page 8.

		2009				2008				2007				2006				2005
		(Dollars in thousands)
Income Statement Data:
Revenues		$	25,729,916			$	32,167,461			$	17,215,992			$	14,383,835			$	11,926,962
Cost of goods sold			24,849,901				30,993,899				16,129,233				13,540,285				11,438,473
Gross profit			880,015				1,173,562				1,086,759				843,550				488,489
Marketing, general and administrative			355,299				329,965				245,357				231,238				199,354
Operating earnings			524,716				843,597				841,402				612,312				289,135
Loss (gain) on investments			56,305				(29,193	)			(20,616	)							(13,013	)
Interest, net			70,487				76,460				31,098				41,305				41,509
Equity income from investments			(105,754	)			(150,413	)			(109,685	)			(84,188	)			(95,742	)
Minority interests			59,780				72,160				143,214				91,079				49,825
Income from continuing operations before income taxes			443,898				874,583				797,391				564,116				306,556
Income taxes			62,491				71,538				40,668				59,350				34,153
Income from continuing operations			381,407				803,045				756,723				504,766				272,403
(Income) loss on discontinued operations, net of taxes															(625	)			16,810
Net income		$	381,407			$	803,045			$	756,723			$	505,391			$	255,593
Balance Sheet Data (August 31):
Working capital		$	1,626,352			$	1,738,600			$	821,878			$	848,344			$	766,807
Net property, plant and equipment			2,099,325				1,948,305				1,728,171				1,476,239				1,359,535
Total assets			7,869,845				8,771,978				6,754,373				4,994,166				4,748,654
Long-term debt, including current maturities			1,071,953				1,194,855				688,321				744,745				773,074
Total equities			3,090,302				2,955,686				2,475,455				2,053,466				1,778,879
Ratio of earnings to fixed charges and preferred dividends(1)			4.6	x			7.4	x			10.1	x			8.3	x			4.7x

(1)		For purposes of computing the ratio of earnings to fixed charges and preferred dividends, earnings consist of income from continuing operations before income taxes on consolidated operations, distributed income from equity investees and fixed charges. Fixed charges consist of interest expense and one-third of rental expense, considered representative of that portion of rental expense estimated to be attributable to interest.

		Energy												Ag Business
		2009				2008				2007				2009				2008				2007
		(Dollars in thousands)
Revenues		$	7,639,838			$	11,499,814			$	8,105,067			$	17,196,448			$	19,696,907			$	8,575,389
Cost of goods sold			7,110,324				11,027,459				7,264,180				16,937,877				19,088,079				8,388,476
Gross profit			529,514				472,355				840,887				258,571				608,828				186,913
Marketing, general and administrative			125,104				111,121				94,939				158,395				160,364				97,299
Operating earnings			404,410				361,234				745,948				100,176				448,464				89,614
Gain on investments			(15,748	)			(35	)							(2,285	)			(100,830	)			(5,348	)
Interest, net			5,483				(5,227	)			(6,106	)			46,995				63,665				28,550
Equity income from investments			(4,044	)			(5,054	)			(4,468	)			(18,222	)			(83,053	)			(51,830	)
Minority interests			59,166				71,805				143,230				614				355				(16	)
Income before income taxes		$	359,553			$	299,745			$	613,292			$	73,074			$	568,327			$	118,258
Intersegment revenues		$	(251,626	)		$	(322,522	)		$	(228,930	)		$	(39,919	)		$	(36,972	)		$	(18,372	)
Total identifiable assets — August 31		$	3,025,522			$	3,216,852			$	2,797,831			$	2,987,394			$	4,172,950			$	2,846,950

		Processing												Corporate and Other
		2009				2008				2007				2009				2008				2007
		(Dollars in thousands)
Revenues		$	1,142,636			$	1,299,209			$	754,743			$	45,298			$	31,363			$	28,465
Cost of goods sold			1,099,177				1,240,944				726,510				(3,173	)			(2,751	)			(2,261	)
Gross profit			43,459				58,265				28,233				48,471				34,114				30,726
Marketing, general and administrative			25,724				26,089				23,545				46,076				32,391				29,574
Operating earnings			17,735				32,176				4,688				2,395				1,723				1,152
Loss (gain) on investments			74,338				72,602				(15,268	)							(930	)
Interest, net			21,841				21,995				14,783				(3,832	)			(3,973	)			(6,129	)
Equity income from investments			(82,525	)			(56,615	)			(48,446	)			(963	)			(5,691	)			(4,941	)
Income (loss) before income taxes		$	4,081			$	(5,806	)		$	53,619			$	7,190			$	12,317			$	12,222
Intersegment revenues		$	(2,759	)		$	(338	)		$	(370	)
Total identifiable assets — August 31		$	685,865			$	748,989			$	681,118			$	1,171,064			$	633,187			$	428,474

 

You should be aware that ownership of our preferred stock involves risks. In consultation with your own financial and legal advisers, you should carefully consider the following discussion of risks that we believe to be significant, together with the other information contained or incorporated by reference in this prospectus, including the section entitled “Special Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements” and our consolidated financial statements and the notes to them. The value of any preferred stock that you own may decline and you could lose the entire value of your preferred stock.

 

Risks Related to our Operations

 

Our revenues and operating results could be adversely affected by changes in commodity prices.

 

Our revenues, earnings and cash flows are affected by market prices for commodities such as crude oil, natural gas, fertilizer, grain, oilseed, flour and crude and refined vegetable oils. Commodity prices generally are affected by a wide range of factors beyond our control, including weather, disease, insect damage, drought, the availability and adequacy of supply, government regulation and policies and general political and economic conditions. We are also exposed to fluctuating commodity prices as the result of our inventories of commodities, typically grain, fertilizer and petroleum products, and purchase and sale contracts at fixed or partially fixed prices. At any time, our inventory levels and unfulfilled fixed or partially fixed price contract obligations may be substantial. In addition, we are exposed to the risk of nonperformance by counterparties to contracts. Risk of nonperformance by counterparties includes the inability to perform because of a counterparty’s financial condition and also the risk that the counterparty will refuse to perform a contract during a period of price fluctuations where contract prices are significantly different than the current market prices. Increases in market prices for commodities that we purchase without a corresponding increase in the prices of our products or our sales volume or a decrease in our other operating expenses could reduce our revenues and net income.

 

In our energy operations, profitability depends largely on the margin between the cost of crude oil that we refine and the selling prices that we obtain for our refined products. Although the prices for crude oil reached historical highs during 2008, the prices for both crude oil and for gasoline, diesel fuel and other refined petroleum products fluctuate widely. Factors influencing these prices, many of which are beyond our control, include:

 

 

The long-term effects of these and other conditions on the prices of crude oil and refined petroleum products are uncertain and ever-changing. Increases in crude oil prices without a corresponding increase in the prices of our refined petroleum products could reduce our net income. Accordingly, we expect our margins on, and the profitability of our energy business to fluctuate, possibly significantly, over time.

Our operating results could be adversely affected if our members were to do business with others rather than with us.

 

  We do not have an exclusive relationship with our members and our members are not obligated to supply us with their products or purchase products from us. Our members often have a variety of distribution outlets and product sources available to them. If our members were to sell their products to other purchasers or purchase products from other sellers, our revenues would decline and our results of operations could be adversely affected.

 

We participate in highly competitive business markets in which we may not be able to continue to compete successfully.

 

  We operate in several highly competitive business segments and our competitors may succeed in developing new or enhanced products that are better than ours, and may be more successful in marketing and selling their products than we are with ours. Competitive factors include price, service level, proximity to markets, product quality and marketing. In some of our business segments, such as Energy, we compete with companies that are larger, better known and have greater marketing, financial, personnel and other resources. As a result, we may not be able to continue to compete successfully with our competitors.

 

Changes in federal income tax laws or in our tax status could increase our tax liability and reduce our net income.

 

  Current federal income tax laws, regulations and interpretations regarding the taxation of cooperatives, which allow us to exclude income generated through business with or for a member (patronage income) from our taxable income, could be changed. If this occurred, or if in the future we were not eligible to be taxed as a cooperative, our tax liability would significantly increase and our net income significantly decrease.

 

We incur significant costs in complying with applicable laws and regulations. Any failure to make the capital investments necessary to comply with these laws and regulations could expose us to financial liability.

 

  We are subject to numerous federal, state and local provisions regulating our business and operations and we incur and expect to incur significant capital and operating expenses to comply with these laws and regulations. We may be unable to pass on those expenses to customers without experiencing volume and margin losses. For example, capital expenditures for upgrading our refineries, largely to comply with regulations requiring the reduction of sulfur levels in refined petroleum products, were completed in fiscal 2006. We incurred capital expenditures from fiscal years 2003 through 2006 related to these upgrades of $88.1 million for our Laurel, Montana refinery and $328.7 million for the National Cooperative Refinery Association’s (NCRA) McPherson, Kansas refinery. The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has passed a regulation that requires the reduction of the benzene level in gasoline to be less than 0.62% volume by January 1, 2011. As a result of this regulation, our refineries will incur capital expenditures to reduce the current gasoline benzene levels to the regulated levels. We anticipate the combined capital expenditures for our Laurel, Montana and NCRA refineries to be approximately $134 million, of which $33 million has been spent through August 31, 2009.

 

  We establish reserves for the future cost of known compliance obligations, such as remediation of identified environmental issues. However, these reserves may prove inadequate to meet our actual liability. Moreover, amended, new or more stringent requirements, stricter interpretations of existing requirements or the future discovery of currently unknown compliance issues may require us to make material expenditures or subject us to liabilities that we currently do not anticipate. Furthermore, our failure to comply with applicable laws and regulations could subject us to administrative penalties and injunctive relief, civil remedies including fines and injunctions, and recalls of our products.

 

Regulations and proposed legislation governing green house gas (GHG) emissions could adversely affect our results and financial condition.

 

  The EPA has recently adopted regulations under the Clean Air Act requiring the owners of certain facilities to measure and report their GHG emissions. The regulations apply to our refineries and may also

apply to other facilities which we own. The EPA may, in the future, limit GHG emissions. Also, proposed legislation is being considered by Congress to regulate GHG emissions which may include cap and trade provisions or a carbon tax. These regulations and proposed legislation could result in additional costs or a reduction in earnings to us and could have a material adverse affect on our results and financial condition.

 

Environmental liabilities could adversely affect our results and financial condition.

 

  Many of our current and former facilities have been in operation for many years and, over that time, we and other operators of those facilities have generated, used, stored and disposed of substances or wastes that are or might be considered hazardous under applicable environmental laws, including liquid fertilizers, chemicals and fuels stored in underground and above-ground tanks. Any past or future actions in violation of applicable environmental laws could subject us to administrative penalties, fines and injunctions. Moreover, future or unknown past releases of hazardous substances could subject us to private lawsuits claiming damages and to adverse publicity. Liabilities, including legal costs, related to remediation of contaminated properties are not recognized until the related costs are considered probable and can be reasonably estimated.

 

Actual or perceived quality, safety or health risks associated with our products could subject us to liability and damage our business and reputation.

 

  If any of our food or feed products became adulterated or misbranded, we would need to recall those items and could experience product liability claims if consumers were injured as a result. A widespread product recall or a significant product liability judgment could cause our products to be unavailable for a period of time or a loss of consumer confidence in our products. Even if a product liability claim is unsuccessful or is not fully pursued, the negative publicity surrounding any assertion that our products caused illness or injury could adversely affect our reputation with existing and potential customers and our corporate and brand image. Moreover, claims or liabilities of this sort might not be covered by our insurance or by any rights of indemnity or contribution that we may have against others. In addition, general public perceptions regarding the quality, safety or health risks associated with particular food or feed products, such as concerns regarding genetically modified crops, could reduce demand and prices for some of the products associated with our businesses. To the extent that consumer preferences evolve away from products that our members or we produce for health or other reasons, such as the growing demand for organic food products, and we are unable to develop products that satisfy new consumer preferences, there will be a decreased demand for our products.

 

Our operations are subject to business interruptions and casualty losses; we do not insure against all potential losses and could be seriously harmed by unexpected liabilities.

 

  Our operations are subject to business interruptions due to unanticipated events such as explosions, fires, pipeline interruptions, transportation delays, equipment failures, crude oil or refined product spills, inclement weather and labor disputes. For example:

 

 

We maintain insurance coverages against many, but not all potential losses or liabilities arising from these operating hazards, but uninsured losses or losses above our coverage limits are possible. Uninsured losses and liabilities arising from operating hazards could have a material adverse effect on our financial position or results of operations.

Our cooperative structure limits our ability to access equity capital.

 

  As a cooperative, we may not sell common stock in our company. In addition, existing laws and our articles of incorporation and bylaws contain limitations on dividends of 8% of any preferred stock that we may issue. These limitations restrict our ability to raise equity capital and may adversely affect our ability to compete with enterprises that do not face similar restrictions.

 

Consolidation among the producers of products we purchase and customers for products we sell could adversely affect our revenues and operating results.

 

  Consolidation has occurred among the producers of products we purchase, including crude oil, fertilizer and grain, and it is likely to continue in the future. Consolidation could increase the price of these products and allow suppliers to negotiate pricing, supply availability and other contract terms that are less favorable to us. Consolidation also may increase the competition among consumers of these products to enter into supply relationships with a smaller number of producers resulting in potentially higher prices for the products we purchase.

 

  Consolidation among purchasers of our products and in wholesale and retail distribution channels has resulted in a smaller customer base for our products and intensified the competition for these customers. For example, ongoing consolidation among distributors and brokers of food products and food retailers has altered the buying patterns of these businesses, as they have increasingly elected to work with product suppliers who can meet their needs nationwide rather than just regionally or locally. If these distributors, brokers and retailers elect not to purchase our products, our sales volumes, revenues and profitability could be significantly reduced.

 

  In the fertilizer market, consolidation at both the producer and customer level increases the threat of direct sales from the producer to the consumer.

 

If our customers choose alternatives to our refined petroleum products our revenues and profits may decline.

 

  Numerous alternative energy sources currently under development could serve as alternatives to our gasoline, diesel fuel and other refined petroleum products. If any of these alternative products become more economically viable or preferable to our products for environmental or other reasons, demand for our energy products would decline. Demand for our gasoline, diesel fuel and other refined petroleum products also could be adversely affected by increased fuel efficiencies.

 

Operating results from our agronomy business could be volatile and are dependent upon certain factors outside of our control.

 

  Planted acreage, and consequently the volume of fertilizer and crop protection products applied, is partially dependent upon government programs, grain prices and the perception held by the producer of demand for production. Weather conditions during the spring planting season and early summer spraying season also affect agronomy product volumes and profitability.

 

Technological improvements in agriculture could decrease the demand for our agronomy and energy products.

 

  Technological advances in agriculture could decrease the demand for crop nutrients, energy and other crop input products and services that we provide. Genetically engineered seeds that resist disease and insects, or that meet certain nutritional requirements, could affect the demand for our crop nutrients and crop protection products. Demand for fuel that we sell could decline as technology allows for more efficient usage of equipment.

 

We operate some of our business through joint ventures in which our rights to control business decisions are limited.

 

  Several parts of our business, including in particular, portions of our grain marketing, wheat milling and foods operations, are operated through joint ventures with third parties. By operating a business through a

joint venture, we have less control over business decisions than we have in our wholly-owned or majority-owned businesses. In particular, we generally cannot act on major business initiatives in our joint ventures without the consent of the other party or parties in those ventures.

 

Risks Related to the Preferred Stock

 

The preferred stock may not continue to qualify for listing on the NASDAQ Global Select Market.

 

  Although the preferred stock is listed on the NASDAQ Global Select Market, it may not continue to qualify for listing. For example, we may be unable to satisfy the requirements regarding “independent” directors as now or subsequently in effect. If our preferred stock were delisted, the liquidity of the market for the preferred stock could be reduced, possibly significantly.

 

The trading market for the preferred stock may not be maintained, which may limit your ability to resell your shares.

 

  The trading market for the preferred stock may not be maintained or provide any significant liquidity. If you decide to sell your preferred stock there may be either no or only a limited number of potential buyers. This, in turn, may affect the price you receive for your preferred stock or your ability to sell your preferred stock at all.

 

If you are able to resell your preferred stock, many factors may affect the price you receive, which may be lower than you believe to be appropriate.

 

  As with other publicly traded securities, many factors could affect the market price of our preferred stock. In addition to those factors relating to CHS and the preferred stock described elsewhere in this “Risk Factors” section and elsewhere in this prospectus, the market price of our preferred stock could be affected by conditions in and perceptions of agricultural and energy markets and companies and also by broader, general market, political and economic conditions.

 

  Furthermore, U.S. stock markets have experienced price and volume volatility that has affected many companies’ stock prices, often for reasons unrelated to the operating performance of those companies. Fluctuations such as these also may affect the market price of our preferred stock. As a result of these factors, you may only be able to sell your preferred stock at prices below those you believe to be appropriate. The trading price for the preferred stock may at any time be less than its issue price pursuant to this prospectus or its liquidation value.

 

Issuances of substantial amounts of preferred stock could adversely affect the market price of our preferred stock.

 

  From time to time in the future, we expect to again issue shares of preferred stock to our members in redemption of a portion of their patrons’ equities or other equity securities and may do so as frequently as annually. We expect these shares to be freely tradeable upon issuance to our members, and some or all members who receive preferred stock may seek to sell their shares in the public market. Furthermore, from time to time we may sell additional shares of preferred stock to the public. Future issuances or sales of our preferred stock or the availability of our preferred stock for sale may adversely affect the market price for our preferred stock or our ability to raise capital by offering equity securities.

 

The terms of the preferred stock are fixed and changes in market conditions, including market interest rates, may decrease the market price for the preferred stock.

 

  The terms of the preferred stock, such as the 8% dividend rate, the amount of the liquidation preference and the redemption terms, are fixed and will not change, even if market conditions with respect to these terms fluctuate. This may mean that you could obtain a higher return from an investment in other securities. It also means that an increase in market interest rates is likely to decrease the market price for the preferred stock.

You will have limited voting rights.

 

  As a holder of the preferred stock, you will be entitled to vote only on actions that would amend, alter or repeal our articles of incorporation or the resolutions establishing the preferred stock if the amendment, alteration or repeal would adversely affect the rights or preferences of the preferred stock or that would create a series of senior equity securities. You will not have the right to vote on actions customarily subject to shareholder vote or approval, including the election of directors, the approval of significant transactions and other amendments to our articles of incorporation that would not adversely affect the rights and preferences of the preferred stock.

 

Payment of dividends on the preferred stock is not guaranteed.

 

  Although dividends on the preferred stock accumulate, our Board of Directors must approve the actual payment of those dividends. Our Board of Directors can elect at any time or from time to time, and for an indefinite duration, not to pay the accumulated dividends. Our Board of Directors could do so for any reason, including the following:

 

 

We can redeem the preferred stock at our discretion, which redemption may be at a price less than its market price and may limit the trading price for the preferred stock.

 

  We have the option of redeeming your shares at any time for $25.00 per share plus any accumulated and unpaid dividends. If we redeem your shares, the redemption price may be less than the price you might receive if you were to sell your shares in the open market. In addition, the fact that the shares are redeemable may limit the price at which they trade.

 

The amount of your liquidation preference or redemption payment is fixed and you will have no right to receive any greater payment regardless of the circumstances.

 

  The payment due upon a liquidation or redemption is fixed at $25.00 per share plus accumulated and unpaid dividends. If we have value remaining after payment of this amount, you will have no right to participate in that value. If the market price for our preferred stock is greater than the redemption price, you will have no right to receive the market price from us upon liquidation or redemption.

 

Your liquidation rights will be subordinate to those of holders of our indebtedness and of any senior equity securities we have issued or may issue in the future and may be subject to the equal rights of other equity securities.

 

  There are no restrictions in the terms of the preferred stock on our ability to incur indebtedness. We can also, with the consent of holders of two-thirds of the outstanding preferred stock, issue preferred equity securities that are senior with respect to liquidation payments to the preferred stock. If we were to liquidate our business, we would be required to repay all of our outstanding indebtedness and to satisfy the liquidation preferences of any senior equity securities that we may issue in the future before we could make any distributions to holders of our preferred stock. We could have insufficient cash available to do so, in which case you would not receive any payment on the amounts due you. Moreover, there are no restrictions on our ability to issue preferred equity securities that rank on a parity with the preferred stock as to liquidation preferences and any amounts remaining after the payment of senior securities would be split equally among all holders of those securities, which might result in your receiving less than the full amount due you.

 

The shares of preferred stock that are being issued pursuant to this prospectus and the registration statement of which it is a part are being issued to redeem $37,000,000 of our “patrons’ equities.” The shares will be issued to redeem our outstanding patrons’ equities on a pro rata basis. Subject to the exceptions described below in “Plan of Distribution,” shares of preferred stock issued in redemption of the patrons’ equities will be issued only to non-individual active members who have conducted business with us during the past five years and whose pro rata share of the redemption amount is equal to or greater than $500. See “Membership and Authorized Capital — Patrons’ Equities” for a discussion of patrons’ equities and our redemption of them. There will not be any cash proceeds from the issuance of preferred stock. However, by issuing shares of preferred stock in redemption of patrons’ equities we will make available for working capital purposes cash that otherwise would be used to redeem those patrons’ equities.

 

We are one of the nation’s leading integrated agricultural companies. As a cooperative, we are owned by farmers and ranchers and their member cooperatives (referred to herein as “members”) across the United States. We also have preferred stockholders that own shares of our 8% Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock, which is listed on the NASDAQ Global Select Market under the symbol CHSCP. On August 31, 2009, we had 10,976,107 shares of preferred stock outstanding. We buy commodities from and provide products and services to patrons (including our members and other non-member customers), both domestic and international. We provide a wide variety of products and services, from initial agricultural inputs such as fuels, farm supplies, crop nutrients and crop protection products, to agricultural outputs that include grains and oilseeds, grain and oilseed processing and food products. A portion of our operations are conducted through equity investments and joint ventures whose operating results are not fully consolidated with our results; rather, a proportionate share of the income or loss from those entities is included as a component in our net income under the equity method of accounting. For the fiscal year ended August 31, 2009, our total revenues were $25.7 billion and our net income was $381.4 million.

 

We have aligned our segments based on an assessment of how our businesses operate and the products and services they sell. Our three segments: Energy, Ag Business and Processing, create vertical integration to link producers with consumers. Our Energy segment derives its revenues through refining, wholesaling and retailing of petroleum products. Our Ag Business segment derives its revenues through the origination and marketing of grain, including service activities conducted at export terminals, through the retail sales of petroleum and agronomy products, processed sunflowers, feed and farm supplies, and records equity income from investments in our agronomy joint ventures, grain export joint ventures and other investments. As of September 2007, our Ag Business segment revenues also include sales of crop nutrient products due to the distribution of that business to us from our Agriliance LLC joint venture. Our Processing segment derives its revenues from the sales of soybean meal and soybean refined oil, and records equity income from wheat milling joint ventures, a vegetable oil-based food manufacturing and distribution joint venture, and through March 2008, an ethanol manufacturing company. We include other business operations in Corporate and Other because of the nature of their products and services, as well as the relative revenues of those businesses. These businesses primarily include our financing, insurance, hedging and other service activities related to crop production.

 

Membership in CHS is restricted to certain producers of agricultural products and to associations of producers of agricultural products that are organized and operating so as to adhere to the provisions of the Agricultural Marketing Act and the Capper-Volstead Act, as amended. Our Board of Directors may establish other qualifications for membership from time to time as it may deem advisable.

 

Our earnings from cooperative business are allocated to members (and to a limited extent, to non-members with which we have agreed to do business on a patronage basis) based on the volume of business they do with us. We allocate these earnings to our patrons in the form of patronage refunds (which are also called patronage dividends) in cash and patron’s equities (capital equity certificates), which may be redeemed over time at the discretion of our Board of Directors. Earnings derived from non-members, which are not allocated patronage, are taxed at federal and state statutory corporate rates and are retained by us as unallocated capital reserve. We also receive patronage refunds from the cooperatives in which we are a member, if those cooperatives have earnings to distribute and if we qualify for patronage refunds from them.

 

Our origins date back to the early 1930s with the founding of the predecessor companies of Cenex, Inc. and Harvest States Cooperatives. CHS Inc. emerged as the result of the merger of those two entities in 1998, and is headquartered in Inver Grove Heights, Minnesota.

The following table presents a summary of our primary subsidiary holdings and equity investments for each of our business segments at August 31, 2009:

 

 

Our segment and international sales information in Note 11 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, as well as the Selected Consolidated Financial Data section of this prospectus, are incorporated by reference into the following segment descriptions.

 

The segment financial information presented below may not represent the results that would have been obtained had the relevant segment been operated as an independent business due to efficiencies in scale, corporate cost allocations and intersegment activity.

 

Overview

 

We are the nation’s largest cooperative energy company based on revenues and identifiable assets, with operations that include petroleum refining and pipelines; the supply, marketing (including ethanol and biodiesel) and distribution of refined fuels (gasoline, diesel fuel and other energy products); the blending, sale and distribution of lubricants; and the wholesale supply of propane. Our Energy segment processes crude oil into refined petroleum products at refineries in Laurel, Montana (wholly-owned) and McPherson, Kansas (an entity in which we have an approximate 74.5% ownership interest) and sells those products under the Cenex^® brand to member cooperatives and others through a network of approximately 1,600 independent retail sites, of which two-thirds are convenience stores marketing Cenex^® branded fuels. Our Energy revenues, after elimination of intersegment revenues, were $7.4 billion and are primarily from gasoline and diesel fuel.

Operations

 

Laurel Refinery.  Our Laurel, Montana refinery processes medium and high sulfur crude oil into refined petroleum products that primarily include gasoline, diesel fuel and asphalt. Our Laurel refinery sources approximately 85% of its crude oil supply from Canada, with the balance obtained from domestic sources, and we have access to Canadian and northwest Montana crude through our wholly-owned Front Range Pipeline, LLC and other common carrier pipelines. Our Laurel refinery also has access to Wyoming crude via common carrier pipelines from the south.

 

Our Laurel facility processes approximately 55,000 barrels of crude oil per day to produce refined products that consist of approximately 48% gasoline, 37% diesel fuel and other distillates and 15% asphalt and other products. During fiscal 2005, our Board of Directors approved the installation of a coker unit at Laurel, along with other refinery improvements, which allows us to extract a greater volume of high value gasoline and diesel fuel from a barrel of crude oil and less relatively low value asphalt. The project became operational in April 2008, and had a total cost of $418.0 million. Refined fuels produced at Laurel are available via the Yellowstone Pipeline to western Montana terminals and to Spokane and Moses Lake, Washington, south via common carrier pipelines to Wyoming terminals and Denver, Colorado and east via our wholly-owned Cenex Pipeline, LLC to Glendive, Montana, and Minot and Fargo, North Dakota. Primarily during fiscal 2008, we incurred approximately $28 million in capital expenditures to construct two product terminals, one of which is tied into the Yellowstone Pipeline. Both new terminals are complete and include rail capabilities. These investments were undertaken to preserve our long-term ability to participate in western U.S. markets.

 

McPherson Refinery.  The McPherson, Kansas refinery is owned and operated by National Cooperative Refinery Association (NCRA), of which we own approximately 74.5%. The McPherson refinery processes approximately 85% low and medium sulfur crude oil and 15% heavy sulfur crude oil into gasoline, diesel fuel and other distillates, propane and other products. NCRA sources its crude oil through its own pipelines as well as common carrier pipelines. The low and medium sulfur crude oil is sourced from Kansas, Oklahoma and Texas, and the heavy sulfur crude oil is sourced from Canada.

 

The McPherson refinery processes approximately 80,000 barrels of crude oil per day to produce refined products that consist of approximately 52% gasoline, 45% diesel fuel and other distillates and 3% propane and other products. Approximately 32% of the refined fuels are loaded into trucks at the McPherson refinery or shipped via NCRA’s proprietary products pipeline to its terminal in Council Bluffs, Iowa. The remaining refined fuel products are shipped to other markets via common carrier pipelines.

 

Renewable Fuels Marketing.  In fiscal 2006, we acquired a 50% ownership interest in an ethanol and biodiesel marketing and distribution company, Provista Renewable Fuels Marketing, LLC (Provista), formerly known as United BioEnergy Fuels, LLC. In fiscal 2008, we acquired the remaining 50% ownership interest of Provista, and in fiscal 2009, Provista was merged into CHS. This business has been consolidated within our financial statements since 2006, and contracts with ethanol and biodiesel production plants to market and distribute their finished products. During fiscal 2009, total sales volumes were 343 million gallons.

 

Other Energy Operations.  We own and operate a propane terminal, four asphalt terminals, seven refined product terminals and three lubricants blending and packaging facilities. We also own and lease a fleet of liquid and pressure trailers and tractors, which are used to transport refined fuels, propane, anhydrous ammonia and other products.

 

Products and Services

 

Our Energy segment produces and sells (primarily wholesale) gasoline, diesel fuel, propane, asphalt, lubricants and other related products and provides transportation services. We obtain the petroleum products that we sell from our Laurel and McPherson refineries, and from third parties. For fiscal 2009, we obtained approximately 58% of the refined products we sold from our Laurel and McPherson refineries and approximately 42% from third parties.

Sales and Marketing; Customers

 

We make approximately 71% of our refined fuel sales to members, with the balance sold to non-members. Sales are made wholesale to member cooperatives and through a network of independent retailers that operate convenience stores under the Cenex/Ampride tradename. We sold approximately 1.3 billion gallons of gasoline and approximately 1.5 billion gallons of diesel fuel in fiscal 2009, excluding NCRA’s sales to minority owners and others totaling approximately 351 million gallons. We also blend, package and wholesale auto and farm machinery lubricants to both members and non-members. In fiscal 2009, our lubricants operations sold approximately 19 million gallons of lube oil. We are one of the nation’s largest propane wholesalers based on revenues. In fiscal 2009, our propane operations sold approximately 643 million gallons of propane. Most of the propane sold in rural areas is for heating and agricultural usage. Annual sales volumes of propane vary greatly depending on weather patterns and crop conditions.

 

Industry; Competition

 

The petroleum business is highly cyclical. Demand for crude oil and energy products is driven by the condition of local and worldwide economies, local and regional weather patterns and taxation relative to other energy sources, which can significantly affect the price of refined fuel products. Most of our energy product market is located in rural areas, so sales activity tends to follow the planting and harvesting cycles. More fuel-efficient equipment, reduced crop tillage, depressed prices for crops, weather conditions and government programs which encourage idle acres, may all reduce demand for our energy products.

 

Regulation.  Governmental regulations and policies, particularly in the areas of taxation, energy and the environment, have a significant impact on our Energy segment. Our Energy segment’s operations are subject to laws and related regulations and rules designed to protect the environment that are administered by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), the Department of Transportation and similar government agencies. These laws, regulations and rules govern the discharge of materials to the environment, air and water; reporting storage of hazardous wastes; the transportation, handling and disposition of wastes; and the labeling of pesticides and similar substances. Failure to comply with these laws, regulations and rules could subject us (and, in the case of the McPherson refinery, NCRA) to administrative penalties, injunctive relief, civil remedies and possible recalls of products. We believe that we and NCRA are in compliance with these laws, regulations and rules in all material respects and do not expect continued compliance to have a material effect on capital expenditures, earnings or competitive position, of either us or NCRA.

 

Like many other refineries, our Energy segment’s refineries recently focused their capital spending on reducing pollution emissions and, at the same, time increasing production to help pay for those expenditures. In particular, our refineries have completed work to comply with the EPA low sulfur fuel regulations that were required by 2006, which lowered the sulfur content of gasoline and diesel fuel. We incurred capital expenditures from fiscal 2003 through 2006 related to this compliance of $88.1 million for our Laurel, Montana refinery and $328.7 million for NCRA’s McPherson, Kansas refinery. The EPA has passed a regulation that requires the reduction of the benzene level in gasoline to be less than 0.62% volume by January 1, 2011. As a result of this regulation, our refineries will incur capital expenditures to reduce the current gasoline benzene levels to the regulated levels. We anticipate the combined capital expenditures for our Laurel, Montana and NCRA refineries to be approximately $134 million, of which $33 million has been spent through August 31, 2009.

 

Competition.  The petroleum refining and wholesale fuels business is very competitive. Among our competitors are some of the world’s largest integrated petroleum companies, which have their own crude oil supplies, distribution and marketing systems. We also compete with smaller domestic refiners and marketers in the midwestern and northwestern United States, with foreign refiners who import products into the United States and with producers and marketers in other industries supplying other forms of energy and fuels to consumers. Given the commodity nature of the end products, profitability in the refining and marketing industry depends largely on margins, as well as operating efficiency, product mix and costs of product distribution and transportation. The retail gasoline market is highly competitive, with much larger competitors

that have greater brand recognition and distribution outlets throughout the country and the world. Our owned and non-owned retail outlets are located primarily in the northwestern, midwestern and southern United States.

 

We market refined fuels, motor gasoline and distillate products in five principal geographic areas. The first area includes the midwest and northern plains. Competition at the wholesale level in this area includes the major oil companies ConocoPhillips, Valero and Citgo, independent refiners including Flint Hills Resources and Growmark, Inc. and wholesale brokers/suppliers including Western Petroleum Company. This area has a robust spot market and is influenced by the large refinery center along the gulf coast.

 

To the east of the midwest and northern plains is another unique marketing area. This area centers near Chicago, Illinois and includes eastern Wisconsin, Illinois and Indiana. CHS principally competes with the major oil companies Marathon, BP Amoco and ExxonMobil, independent refineries including Flint Hills Resources and Growmark, Inc. and wholesale brokers/suppliers including U.S. Oil.

 

Another market area is located south of Chicago, Illinois. This area includes Arkansas, Missouri and the northern part of Texas. Competition in this area includes the major oil companies Valero and ExxonMobil and independent refiners including Lion. This area is principally supplied from the Gulf coast refinery center and is also driven by a strong spot market that reacts quickly to changes in the international and national supply balance.

 

Another geographic area includes Montana, western North Dakota, Wyoming, Utah, Idaho, Colorado and western South Dakota. Competition at the wholesale level in this area includes the major oil companies ExxonMobil and ConocoPhillips and independent refiners including Frontier Refining and Sinclair. This area is also noted for being fairly well balanced in demand and supply, but is typically influenced by Canadian refined fuels moving into the U.S. through terminals in Canada and by rail from independent Canadian refiners.

 

The last area includes much of Washington and Oregon. We compete with the major oil companies Tesoro, BP Amoco and Chevron in this area. This area is also known for volatile prices and an active spot market.

 

Summary Operating Results

 

Summary operating results and identifiable assets for our Energy segment for the fiscal years ended August 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007 are shown below:

 

 

Our Ag Business segment includes agronomy, country operations and grain marketing. Revenues in our Ag Business segment primarily include grain sales of $13.0 billion, after elimination of intersegment revenues.

 

Agronomy

 

Overview

 

Through our fiscal year ended August 31, 2007, we conducted our wholesale, and some of our retail, agronomy operations through our 50% ownership interest in Agriliance LLC (Agriliance), in which Land O’Lakes, Inc. (Land O’Lakes) holds the other 50% ownership interest. Prior to September 2007, Agriliance was one of North America’s largest wholesale distributors of crop nutrients, crop protection products and other agronomy products based upon annual sales. Our 50% ownership interest in Agriliance is treated as an equity method investment, and therefore, Agriliance’s revenues and expenses are not reflected in our operating results. At August 31, 2009, our equity investment in Agriliance was $80.4 million.

 

In September 2007, Agriliance distributed the assets of the crop nutrients business to us, and the assets of the crop protection business to Land O’Lakes. Due to our 50% ownership interest in Agriliance and the 50% ownership interest of Land O’Lakes, each company was entitled to receive 50% of the distributions from Agriliance. Given the different preliminary values assigned to the assets of the crop nutrients and the crop protection businesses of Agriliance, at the closing of the distribution transactions Land O’Lakes owed us $133.5 million. Land O’Lakes paid us $32.6 million in cash, and in order to maintain equal capital accounts in Agriliance, they also paid down certain portions of Agriliance’s debt on our behalf in the amount of $100.9 million. Values of the distributed assets were finalized after the closing, and in October 2007, we made a true-up payment to Land O’Lakes in the amount of $45.7 million, plus interest. During fiscal 2009, the final true-up amount was determined, and we received $0.9 million from Land O’Lakes.

 

The distribution of assets we received from Agriliance for the crop nutrients business had a book value of $248.2 million. We recorded 50% of the value of the net assets received at book value due to our ownership interest in those assets when they were held by Agriliance, and 50% of the value of the net assets at fair value using the purchase method of accounting. Values assigned to the net assets distributed to us totaled $268.7 million.

 

Agriliance continues to exist as a 50-50 joint venture and primarily operates and sells agronomy products on a retail basis. Subsequent to the end of fiscal 2009, we have, along with Land O’Lakes, sold or reached agreement to sell a substantial number of the Agriliance retail facilities to various third parties, as well as to us and to Land O’Lakes. Sales which have not yet closed are anticipated to close on or before December 31, 2009. We expect to receive cash distributions from Agriliance for proceeds related to these transactions of approximately $50.0 million, net of what we pay for the assets we acquire. We are still attempting to reposition the remaining Agriliance facilities located primarily in Florida.

 

After a fiscal 2005 initial public offering (IPO) transaction for CF Industries, Inc., a crop nutrients manufacturer and distributor, we held an ownership interest in the post-IPO company named CF Industries Holdings, Inc. (CF) of approximately 3.9% or 2,150,396 shares. During the year ended August 31, 2007, we sold 540,000 shares of our CF stock for proceeds of $10.9 million, and recorded a pretax gain of $5.3 million, reducing our ownership in CF to approximately 2.9%. During the year ended August 31, 2008, we sold our remaining 1,610,396 shares of CF stock for proceeds of $108.3 million and recorded a pretax gain of $91.7 million.

 

There is significant seasonality in the sale of agronomy products and services, with peak activity coinciding with the planting and input seasons. There is also significant volatility in the prices for the crop nutrient products we purchase and sell.

Operations

 

Our wholesale crop nutrients business sells approximately 5.8 million tons of fertilizer annually, based on an average of fiscal years 2009 and 2008, making it one of the largest wholesale fertilizer operations in the United States based on tons sold. Product is either delivered directly to the customer from the manufacturer, or through our 15 inland or river warehouse terminals and other non-owned storage facilities located throughout the country. In addition, our Galveston, Texas deep water port and terminal receives fertilizer by vessel from originations such as the Middle East and Caribbean basin where less expensive natural gas tends to give a price advantage over domestically produced fertilizer. The fertilizer is then shipped by rail to destinations within crop producing regions of the country. Based on fertilizer market data, our wholesale crop nutrients, sales account for approximately 11% of the U.S. market.

 

Primary suppliers for our wholesale crop nutrients business include CF, Potash Corporation of Saskatchewan, Mosaic, Koch Industries, Yara, PIC (Kuwait) and Sabic America. During the year ended August 31, 2009, CF was the largest supplier of crop nutrients to us.

 

Products and Services

 

Our wholesale crop nutrients business sells nitrogen, phosphorus, potassium and sulfate based products. During the year ended August 31, 2009, the primary crop nutrients products purchased by us were urea, potash, UAN, phosphates and ammonia.

 

Sales and Marketing; Customers

 

Our wholesale crop nutrients business sells product to approximately 2,100 local retailers from New York to the west coast and from the Canadian border to Texas. Our largest customers include Agriliance retail operations and our own country operations business, also included in our Ag Business segment. Many of the customers of our crop nutrients business are also customers of our Energy segment or suppliers to our grain marketing business.

 

Industry; Competition

 

Regulation.  Our wholesale crop nutrients operations are subject to laws and related regulations and rules designed to protect the environment that are administered by the EPA, the Department of Transportation and similar government agencies. These laws, regulations and rules govern the discharge of materials to the environment, air and water; reporting storage of hazardous wastes; the transportation, handling and disposition of wastes; and the labeling of pesticides and similar substances. Failure to comply with these laws, regulations and rules could subject us to administrative penalties, injunctive relief, civil remedies and possible recalls of products. We believe that we are in compliance with these laws, regulations and rules in all material respects and do not expect continued compliance to have a material effect on our capital expenditures, earnings or competitive position.

 

Competition.  The wholesale distribution of crop nutrients products is highly competitive and dependent upon relationships with local cooperatives and private retailers, proximity to the customer and competitive pricing. We compete with other large agronomy distributors, as well as other regional or local distributors, retailers and manufacturers. Major competitors in crop nutrients distribution include Koch Industries, Agrium, Terra Industries and a variety of traders and brokers.

 

Country Operations

 

Overview

 

Our country operations business purchases a variety of grains from our producer members and other third parties, and provides cooperative members and producers with access to a full range of products and services including farm supplies and programs for crop and livestock production. Country operations operates 382 locations dispersed throughout Colorado, Idaho, Iowa, Kansas, Minnesota, Montana, Nebraska, North Dakota, Oklahoma, Oregon, South Dakota and Washington. Most of these locations purchase grain from farmers and

sell agronomy products, energy products, feed and seed to those same producers and others, although not all locations provide every product and service.

 

Products and Services

 

Grain Purchasing.  We are one of the largest country elevator operators in North America based on revenues. Through a majority of our elevator locations, our country operations business purchases grain from member and non-member producers and other elevators and grain dealers. Most of the grain purchased is either sold through our grain marketing operations or used for local feed and processing operations. For the year ended August 31, 2009, country operations purchased approximately 418 million bushels of grain, primarily wheat, corn and soybeans. Of these bushels, 389 million were purchased from members and 280 million were sold through our grain marketing operations.

 

Other Products.  Our country operations business manufactures and sells other products, both directly and through ownership interests in other entities. These include seed, crop nutrients, crop protection products, energy products, animal feed, animal health products and processed sunflowers. We sell agronomy products at 235 locations, feed products at 153 locations and energy products at 154 locations.

 

Industry; Competition

 

Regulation.  Our country operations business is subject to laws and related regulations and rules designed to protect the environment that are; administered by the EPA, the Department of Transportation and similar government agencies. These laws, regulations and rules govern the discharge of materials to the environment, air and water; reporting storage of hazardous wastes; the transportation, handling and disposition of wastes; and the labeling of pesticides and similar substances. Our country operations business is also subject to laws and related regulations and rules administered by the United States Department of Agriculture, the United States Food and Drug Administration, and other federal, state, local and foreign governmental agencies that govern the processing, packaging, storage, distribution, advertising, labeling, quality and safety of feed and grain products. Failure to comply with these laws, regulations and rules could subject us to administrative penalties, injunctive relief, civil remedies and possible recalls of products. We believe that we are in compliance with these laws, regulations and rules in all material respects and do not expect continued compliance to have a material effect on our capital expenditures, earnings or competitive position.

 

Competition.  We compete primarily on the basis of price, services and patronage. Competitors for the purchase of grain include Archer Daniels Midland (ADM), Cargill, Incorporated (Cargill), local cooperatives and smaller private grain companies and processors at the majority of our locations in our trade territory, as previously defined in the “Overview.” In addition, Columbia Grain is also our competitor in Montana and North Dakota.

 

Competitors for our farm supply businesses include Cargill, Agrium, Simplot, Helena, Wilbur Ellis, local cooperatives and smaller private companies at the majority of locations throughout our trade territory. In addition, Land O’Lakes Purina Feed, Hubbard Milling, ADM and Cargill are our major competitors for the sale of feed products.

 

Grain Marketing

 

Overview

 

We are the nation’s largest cooperative marketer of grain and oilseed based on grain storage capacity and grain sales, handling almost 1.8 billion bushels annually. During fiscal 2009, we purchased approximately 56% of our total grain volumes from individual and cooperative association members and our country operations business, with the balance purchased from third parties. We arrange for the transportation of the grains either directly to customers or to our owned or leased grain terminals and elevators awaiting delivery to domestic and foreign purchasers. We primarily conduct our grain marketing operations directly, but do conduct some of our business through joint ventures.

Operations

 

Our grain marketing operations purchases grain directly and indirectly from agricultural producers primarily in the midwestern and western United States. The purchased grain is typically contracted for sale for future delivery at a specified location, and we are responsible for handling the grain and arranging for its transportation to that location. The sale of grain is recorded after title to the commodity has transferred and final weights, grades and settlement price have been agreed upon. Amounts billed to the customer as part of a sales transaction include the costs for shipping and handling. Our ability to arrange efficient transportation, including loading capabilities onto unit trains, ocean-going vessels and barges, is a significant part of the services we offer to our customers. Rail, vessel, barge and truck transportation is carried out by third parties, often under long-term freight agreements with us. Grain intended for export is usually shipped by rail or barge to an export terminal, where it is loaded onto ocean-going vessels. Grain intended for domestic use is usually shipped by rail or truck to various locations throughout the country.

 

We own and operate export terminals, river terminals and elevators involved in the handling and transport of grain. Our river terminals are used to load grain onto barges for shipment to both domestic and export customers via the Mississippi River system. These river terminals are located at Savage and Winona, Minnesota and Davenport, Iowa, as well as terminals in which we have put-through agreements located at St. Louis, Missouri and Beardstown and Havana, Illinois. Our export terminal at Superior, Wisconsin provides access to the Great Lakes and St. Lawrence Seaway and our export terminal at Myrtle Grove, Louisiana serves the gulf market. In the Pacific Northwest, we conduct our grain marketing operations through United Harvest, LLC (United Harvest) (a 50% joint venture with United Grain Corporation, a subsidiary of Mitsui & Co., Ltd. (Mitsui)) and TEMCO, LLC (a 50% joint venture with Cargill). United Harvest operates grain terminals in Vancouver and Kalama, Washington and primarily exports wheat. TEMCO, LLC operates an export terminal in Tacoma, Washington and primarily exports corn and soybeans. These facilities serve the Pacific market, as well as domestic grain customers in the western United States. We also own two 110-car shuttle-receiving elevator facilities in Friona, Texas and Collins, Mississippi that serve large-scale feeder cattle, dairy and poultry producers in those regions.

 

In 2003, we opened an office in Sao Paulo, Brazil for the procurement of soybeans for our grain marketing operations international customers. During the year ended August 31, 2007, we invested $22.2 million in Multigrain AG (Multigrain) for a 37.5% equity position in a Brazil-based grain handling and merchandising company, Multigrain S.A., an agricultural commodities business headquartered in Sao Paulo, Brazil. The venture, which includes grain storage and export facilities, builds on our South American soybean origination and helps meet customer needs year-round. During the year ended August 31, 2008, we increased our equity position through a purchase from an existing equity holder for $10.0 million, and also invested an additional $30.3 million, which was used by Multigrain to invest in a joint venture that acquired production farmland and related operations including production of soybeans, corn, cotton and sugarcane, as well as cotton processing, at four locations. During fiscal 2009, we invested $76.3 million for Multigrain’s increased capital needs resulting from expansion of their operations. Our current ownership interest in Multigrain is 39.35%.

 

We have opened additional international offices between July 2007 and August 2009, including Geneva, Switzerland; Kiev, Ukraine and Vostok, Russia, for sourcing and marketing grains and oilseeds through the Black Sea and Mediterranean Basin regions to customers worldwide. We have announced our commitment to invest approximately $30 million in a construction project in the port of Odessa, Ukraine, with the resulting port facility to have a grain storage capacity of 120,000 metric tons and the ability to load Panamax vessels at a pace of 20,000 metric tons per day. Offices in Hong Kong and Shanghai, China serve Pacific Rim customers receiving grains and oilseeds from our origination points in North and South America. The most recent grain merchandising office opened during fiscal 2009 is located in Barcelona, Spain, and subsequent to our fiscal year ended August 31, 2009, we opened another office in Buenos Aires, Argentina.

 

Our grain marketing operations may have significant working capital needs, at any time, depending on commodity prices and other factors. The amount of borrowings for this purpose, and the interest rate charged on those borrowings, directly affects the profitability of our grain marketing operations.

Products and Services

 

Our grain marketing operations purchased approximately 1.8 billion bushels of grain during the year ended August 31, 2009, which primarily included corn, soybeans, wheat and distillers dried grains (DDGs). Of the total grains purchased by our grain marketing operations, 698 million bushels were from our individual and cooperative association members, 280 million bushels were from our country operations business and the remainder were from third parties.

 

Sales and Marketing; Customers

 

Purchasers of our grain and oilseed include domestic and foreign millers, maltsters, feeders, crushers and other processors. To a much lesser extent purchasers include intermediaries and distributors. Our grain marketing operations are not dependent on any one customer, and its supply relationships call for delivery of grain at prevailing market prices.

 

Industry; Competition

 

Regulation.  Our grain marketing operations are subject to laws and related regulations and rules designed to protect the environment that are administered by the EPA, the Department of Transportation and similar government agencies. These laws, regulations and rules govern the discharge of materials to environment, air and water; reporting storage of hazardous wastes; and the transportation, handling and disposition of wastes. Our grain marketing operations are also subject to laws and related regulations and rules administered by the United States Department of Agriculture, the United States Food and Drug Administration, and other federal, state, local and foreign governmental agencies that govern the processing, packaging, storage, distribution, advertising, labeling, quality and safety of food and grain products. Failure to comply with these laws, regulations and rules could subject us to administrative penalties, injunctive relief, civil remedies and possible recalls of products. We believe that we are in compliance with these laws, regulations and rules in all material respects and do not expect continued compliance to have a material effect on our capital expenditures, earnings or competitive position.

 

Competition.  Our grain marketing operations compete for both the purchase and the sale of grain. Competition is intense and margins are low. Some competitors are integrated food producers, which may also be customers. A few major competitors have substantially greater financial resources than we have.

 

In the purchase of grain from producers, location of a delivery facility is a prime consideration, but producers are increasingly willing to transport grain longer distances for sale. Price is affected by the capabilities of the facility; for example, if it is cheaper to deliver to a customer by unit train than by truck, a facility with unit train capabilities provides a price advantage. We believe that our relationships with individual members serviced by our local country operations locations and with our cooperative members give us a broad origination capability.

 

Our grain marketing operations compete for grain sales based on price, services and ability to provide the desired quantity and quality of grains. Location of facilities is a major factor in the ability to compete. Our grain marketing operations compete with numerous grain merchandisers, including major grain merchandising companies such as ADM, Cargill, Bunge and Louis Dreyfus, each of which handle significant grain volumes.

 

The results of our grain marketing operations may be adversely affected by relative levels of supply and demand, both domestic and international, commodity price levels (including grain prices reported on national markets) and transportation costs and conditions. Supply is affected by weather conditions, disease, insect damage, acreage planted and government regulations and policies. Demand may be affected by foreign governments and their programs, relationships of foreign countries with the United States, the affluence of foreign countries, acts of war, currency exchange fluctuations and substitution of commodities. Demand may also be affected by changes in eating habits, population growth, the level of per capita consumption of some products and the level of renewable fuels production.

Summary Operating Results

 

Summary operating results and identifiable assets for our Ag Business segment for the fiscal years ended August 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007 are shown below:

 

 

Overview

 

Our Processing segment converts raw agricultural commodities into ingredients for finished food products or into finished consumer food products. We have focused on areas that allow us to utilize the products supplied by our member producers. These areas currently include oilseed processing and our joint ventures in wheat milling and foods.

 

Regulation.  Our Processing segment’s operations are subject to laws and related regulations and rules designed to protect the environment that are administered by the EPA, the Department of Transportation and similar government agencies. These laws, regulations and rules govern the discharge of materials to environment, air and water; reporting storage of hazardous wastes; and the transportation, handling and disposition of wastes. Our Processing segment’s operations are also subject to laws and related regulations and rules administered by the United States Department of Agriculture, the United States Food and Drug Administration, and other federal, state, local and foreign governmental agencies that govern the processing, packaging, storage, distribution, advertising, labeling, quality and safety of food and grain products. Failure to comply with these laws, regulations and rules could subject us, or our foods partners to administrative penalties, injunctive relief, civil remedies and possible recalls of products. We believe that we are in compliance with these laws, regulations and rules in all material respects and do not expect continued compliance to have a material effect on our capital expenditures, earnings or competitive position.

 

Oilseed Processing

 

Our oilseed processing operations convert soybeans into soybean meal, soyflour, crude soybean oil, refined soybean oil and associated byproducts. These operations are conducted at a facility in Mankato, Minnesota that can crush approximately 40 million bushels of soybeans on an annual basis, producing approximately 960,000 short tons of soybean meal and 460 million pounds of crude soybean oil. The same facility is able to process approximately 1 billion pounds of refined soybean oil annually. Another crushing facility in Fairmont, Minnesota has a crushing capacity of over 45 million bushels of soybeans on an annual basis.

Our oilseed processing operations produce three primary products: refined oils, soybean meal and soyflour. Refined oils are used in processed foods, such as margarine, shortening, salad dressings and baked goods, as well as methyl ester/biodiesel production, and to a lesser extent, for certain industrial uses such as plastics, inks and paints. Soybean meal has high protein content and is used for feeding livestock. Soyflour is used in the baking industry, as a milk replacement in animal feed and in industrial applications. We produce approximately 60,000 tons of soyflour annually, and approximately 20% is further processed at our manufacturing facility in Hutchinson, Kansas, which was a business acquisition in April 2008. This facility manufactures unflavored and flavored textured soy proteins used in human and pet food products, and accounted for approximately 2% of our oilseed processing annual sales in fiscal 2009.

 

Our soy processing facilities are located in areas with a strong production base of soybeans and end-user market for the meal and soyflour. We purchase virtually all of our soybeans from members. Our oilseed crushing operations currently produce approximately 95% of the crude soybean oil that we refine and purchase the balance from outside suppliers.

 

Our customers for refined oil are principally large food product companies located throughout the United States. However, over 50% of our customers are located in the midwest due to relatively lower freight costs and slightly higher profitability potential. Our largest customer for refined oil products is Ventura Foods, LLC (Ventura Foods), in which we hold a 50% ownership interest and with which we have a long-term supply agreement to supply minimum quantities of edible soybean oils as long as we maintain a minimum 25.5% ownership interest and our price is competitive with other suppliers of the product. Our sales to Ventura Foods accounted for 22% of our soybean oil sold during fiscal 2009. We also sell soymeal to about 350 customers, primarily feed lots and feed mills in southern Minnesota. In fiscal 2009, Commodity Specialists Company accounted for 18% of our soymeal sold. We sell soyflour to customers in the baking industry both domestically and for export.

 

The refined soybean products industry is highly competitive. Major industry competitors include ADM, Cargill, Ag Processing Inc. and Bunge. These and other competitors have acquired other processors, expanded existing plants or constructed new plants, both domestically and internationally. Price, transportation costs, services and product quality drive competition. We estimate that we have a market share of approximately 4% to 5% of the domestic refined soybean oil and also the domestic soybean crushing capacity.

 

Soybeans are a commodity and their price can fluctuate significantly depending on production levels, demand for the products and other supply factors.

 

Wheat Milling

 

In January 2002, we formed a joint venture with Cargill named Horizon Milling, LLC (Horizon Milling), in which we hold an ownership interest of 24%, with Cargill owning the remaining 76%. Horizon Milling is the largest U.S. wheat miller based on output volume. We own five mills that we lease to Horizon Milling. Sales and purchases of wheat and durum by us to Horizon Milling during fiscal 2009 were $395.8 million and $2.7 million, respectively. Horizon Milling’s advance payments on grain to us were $15.1 million on August 31, 2009 and are included in customer advance payments on our Consolidated Balance Sheet. We account for Horizon Milling using the equity method of accounting and on August 31, 2009, our investment was $57.0 million. On August 31, 2009, our net book value of assets leased to Horizon Milling was $65.3 million.

 

During the year ended August 31, 2007, we invested $15.6 million in Horizon Milling G.P. (24% CHS ownership with Cargill owning the remaining 76%), a joint venture that acquired the Canadian grain-based foodservice and industrial businesses of Smucker Foods of Canada, which includes three flour milling operations and two dry baking mixing facilities in Canada. During the year ended August 31, 2008, we invested an additional $1.9 million in Horizon Milling G.P. We account for the investment using the equity method of accounting and on August 31, 2009, our investment was $19.1 million.

Foods

 

Our primary focus in the foods area is Ventura Foods, LLC (Ventura Foods) which produces and distributes vegetable oil-based products such as margarine, salad dressing and other food products. Ventura Foods was created in 1996 and is owned 50% by us and 50% by Wilsey Foods, Inc., a majority owned subsidiary of Mitsui. We account for our Ventura Foods investment under the equity method of accounting and on August 31, 2009, our investment was $245.5 million.

 

Ventura Foods manufactures, packages, distributes and markets bulk margarine, salad dressings, mayonnaise, salad oils, syrups, soup bases and sauces, many of which utilize soybean oil as a primary ingredient. Approximately 40% of Ventura Foods’ volume, based on sales, comes from products for which Ventura Foods owns the brand, while the remainder comes from products that it produces for third parties. A variety of Ventura Foods’ product formulations and processes are proprietary to it or its customers. Ventura Foods is the largest manufacturer of margarine for the foodservice sector in the U.S. and is a major producer of many other products.

 

Ventura Foods currently has 11 manufacturing and distribution locations across the United States. Ventura Foods sources its raw materials, which consist primarily of soybean oil, canola oil, cottonseed oil, peanut oil and other ingredients and supplies, from various national suppliers, including our oilseed processing operations. It sells the products it manufactures to third parties as a contract manufacturer, as well as directly to retailers, food distribution companies and large institutional food service companies. Ventura Foods sales are approximately 60% in foodservice and the remainder is split between retail and industrial customers who use edible oil products as ingredients in foods they manufacture for resale. During Ventura Foods’ 2009 fiscal year, Sysco accounted for 23% of its net sales.

 

Ventura Foods competes with a variety of large companies in the food manufacturing industry. Major competitors include ADM, Cargill, Bunge, Unilever, ConAgra, ACH Food Companies, Smuckers, Kraft, CF Sauer, Ken’s, Marzetti and Nestle.

 

Renewable Fuels

 

In fiscal 2006, we purchased $70.0 million of common stock in US BioEnergy, an ethanol production company, representing an approximate 24% ownership interest on August 31, 2006. During the year ended August 31, 2007, we made additional investments of $45.4 million. In December 2006, US BioEnergy completed an IPO, and the effect of the issuance of additional shares of its stock was to dilute our ownership interest from approximately 25% to 21%. In addition, on August 29, 2007, US BioEnergy completed an acquisition with total aggregate net consideration comprised of the issuance of US BioEnergy common stock and cash. Due to US BioEnergy’s increase in equity, primarily from these two transactions, we recognized a non-cash net gain of $15.3 million on our investment during the year ended August 31, 2007, to reflect our proportionate share of the increase in the underlying equity of US BioEnergy. During the first quarter of fiscal 2008, we purchased additional shares of US BioEnergy common stock for $6.5 million. Through March 31, 2008, we were recognizing our share of the earnings of US BioEnergy, using the equity method of accounting. Effective April 1, 2008, US BioEnergy and VeraSun Energy Corporation (VeraSun) completed a merger, and our ownership interest in the combined entity was reduced to approximately 8%, compared to an approximate 20% interest in US BioEnergy prior to the merger. As part of the merger transaction, our shares held in US BioEnergy were converted to shares held in the surviving company, VeraSun, at 0.810 per share. As a result of our change in ownership interest, we no longer had significant influence, and therefore, no longer accounted for VeraSun using the equity method. Due to the continued decline of the ethanol industry and other considerations, we determined that an impairment of our VeraSun investment was necessary during fiscal 2008, and as a result, based on VeraSun’s market value of $5.76 per share on August 29, 2008, an impairment charge of $71.7 million was recorded in loss (gain) on investments. Subsequent to August 31, 2008, the market value of VeraSun’s stock price continued to decline, and on October 31, 2008, VeraSun filed for relief under Chapter 11 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code. Consequently, we determined an additional impairment was necessary based on VeraSun’s market value of $0.28 per share on November 3, 2008, and recorded an impairment charge of $70.7 million during our first quarter of fiscal 2009. Due to the outcome of the VeraSun

bankruptcy, during the third quarter of fiscal 2009, we wrote off the remaining investment of $3.6 million. The impairments did not affect our cash flows and did not have a bearing upon our compliance with any covenants under our credit facilities.

 

Summary Operating Results

 

Summary operating results and identifiable assets for our Processing segment for the fiscal years ended August 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007 are shown below:

 

 

Business Solutions

 

Financial Services.  We have provided open account financing to approximately 100 of our members that are cooperatives (cooperative association members) in the past year. These arrangements involve the discretionary extension of credit in the form of a clearing account for settlement of grain purchases and as a cash management tool.

 

Cofina Financial, LLC.  Cofina Financial, LLC (Cofina Financial), a finance company formed in fiscal 2005, makes seasonal and term loans to member cooperatives and individuals. Through August 31, 2008, we accounted for our 49% ownership interest in Cofina Financial using the equity method of accounting. On September 1, 2008, Cofina Financial became a wholly-owned subsidiary when we purchased the remaining 51% ownership interest for $53.3 million, which included cash of $48.5 million and the assumption of certain liabilities of $4.8 million.

 

Country Hedging, Inc.  Our wholly-owned subsidiary, Country Hedging, Inc., is a registered futures commission merchant and a clearing member of both the Minneapolis Grain Exchange and the Kansas City Board of Trade, and is also a full-service commodity futures and options broker.

 

Ag States Group.  Our wholly-owned subsidiary, Ag States Agency, LLC, is an independent insurance agency. It sells insurance, including group benefits, property and casualty and bonding programs. Its approximately 2,000 customers are primarily agricultural businesses, including local cooperatives and independent elevators, petroleum outlets, agronomy, feed and seed plants, implement dealers, fruit and vegetable packers/warehouses and food processors. Impact Risk Solutions, LLC, a wholly-owned subsidiary of Ag States Agency, LLC, conducts the insurance brokerage business of Ag States Group.

 

When we enter into a commodity purchase or sales commitment, we incur risks related to price change and performance (including delivery, quality, quantity and shipment period). We are exposed to risk of loss in the market value of positions held, consisting of inventory and purchase contracts at a fixed or partially fixed price in the event market prices decrease. We are also exposed to risk of loss on our fixed price or partially fixed price sales contracts in the event market prices increase.

 

Our hedging activities reduce the effects of price volatility, thereby protecting against adverse short-term price movements, but also limit the benefits of short-term price movements. To reduce the price change risks associated with holding fixed price commitments, we generally take opposite and offsetting positions by entering into commodity futures contracts or options, to the extent practical, in order to arrive at a net commodity position within the formal position limits we have established and deemed prudent for each commodity. These contracts are purchased and sold on regulated commodity futures exchanges for grain, and regulated mercantile exchanges for refined products and crude oil. We also use over-the-counter (OTC) instruments to hedge our exposure on flat price fluctuations. The price risk we encounter for crude oil and most of the grain and oilseed volume we handle can be hedged. Price risk associated with fertilizer and certain grains cannot be hedged because there are no futures for these commodities and, as a result, risk is managed through the use of forward sales contracts and other pricing arrangements and, to some extent, cross-commodity futures hedging. These contracts are economic hedges of price risk, but are not designated or accounted for as hedging instruments for accounting purposes in any of our operations. They are recorded on our Consolidated Balance Sheets at fair values based on quotes listed on regulated commodity exchanges or are based on the market prices of the underlying products listed on the exchanges, with the exception of fertilizer and propane contracts, which are accounted for as normal purchase and normal sales transactions. Unrealized gains and losses on these contracts are recognized in cost of goods sold in our Consolidated Statements of Operations using market-based prices.

 

When a futures contract is entered into, an initial margin deposit must be sent to the applicable exchange or broker. The amount of the deposit is set by the exchange and varies by commodity. If the market price of a short futures contract increases, then an additional maintenance margin deposit would be required. Similarly, if the price of a long futures contract decreases, a maintenance margin deposit would be required and sent to the applicable exchange. Subsequent price changes could require additional maintenance margins or could result in the return of maintenance margins.

 

Our policy is to primarily maintain hedged positions in grain and oilseed. Our profitability from operations is primarily derived from margins on products sold and grain merchandised, not from hedging transactions. At any one time, inventory and purchase contracts for delivery to us may be substantial. We have risk management policies and procedures that include net position limits. These limits are defined for each commodity and include both trader and management limits. The policy and computerized procedures in our grain marketing operations require a review by operations management when any trader is outside of position limits and also a review by our senior management if operating areas are outside of position limits. A similar process is used in our energy and wholesale crop nutrients operations. The position limits are reviewed, at least annually, with our management and Board of Directors. We monitor current market conditions and may expand or reduce our net position limits or procedures in response to changes in those conditions. In addition, all purchase and sales contracts are subject to credit approvals and appropriate terms and conditions.

 

Hedging arrangements do not protect against nonperformance by counterparties to contracts. We primarily use exchange traded instruments, which minimize our counterparty exposure. We evaluate that exposure by reviewing contracts and adjusting the values to reflect potential nonperformance. Risk of nonperformance by counterparties includes the inability to perform because of a counterparty’s financial condition and also the risk that the counterparty will refuse to perform on a contract during periods of price fluctuations where contract prices are significantly different than the current market prices. We manage our risks by entering into fixed price purchase and sales contracts with preapproved producers and by establishing appropriate limits for individual suppliers. Fixed price contracts are entered into with customers of acceptable creditworthiness, as internally evaluated. Historically, we have not experienced significant events of nonperformance on open

contracts. Accordingly, we only adjust the estimated fair values of specifically identified contracts for nonperformance. Although we have established policies and procedures, we make no assurances that historical nonperformance experience will carry forward to future periods.

 

At August 31, 2009, we had 8,802 full, part-time, temporary and seasonal employees, which included approximately 650 employees of NCRA. Of that total, 2,856 were employed in our Energy segment, 4,367 in our country operations business (including approximately 1,182 seasonal and temporary employees), 190 in our crop nutrients operations, 620 in our grain marketing operations, 323 in our Processing segment and 446 in Corporate and Other. In addition to those employed directly by us, many employees work for joint ventures in which we have a 50% or less ownership interest, and are not included in these totals. A portion of all of our segments and Corporate and Other are employed in this manner.

 

Employees in certain areas are represented by collective bargaining agreements. Refinery and pipeline workers in Laurel, Montana are represented by agreements with two separate unions. The United Steel Worker (USW) Union Local 11-443 represents 200 refinery employees for which agreements are in place through February 1, 2012 and the Oil Basin Pipeliners Union (OBP) represents 18 pipeline employees for which agreements are in place through September 1, 2011. The contracts covering the NCRA McPherson, Kansas refinery include 306 employees represented by the United Steel Workers of America (USWA) that are in place through June 2012. There are approximately 168 employees in transportation and lubricant plant operations that are covered by other collective bargaining agreements that expire at various times. The collective bargaining agreement covering 32 lubricant plant employees expired on October 31, 2009 and was extended through November 30, 2009. A new contract was ratified on December 4, 2009, effective November 1, 2009, and expires October 31, 2013. Certain production workers in our oilseed processing operations are subject to collective bargaining agreements with the Bakery, Confectionary, Tobacco Worker and Grain Millers (BTWGM) (120 employees) and the Pipefitters’ Union (2 employees), for which a new collective bargaining agreement covering such workers was entered into on November 19, 2009, and expires June 30, 2012. The BTWGM also represents 43 employees at our Superior, Wisconsin grain export terminal with a contract expiring in 2010. The USWA represents 80 employees at our Myrtle Grove, Louisiana grain export terminal with a contract expiring in 2010, the Teamsters represent 7 employees at our Winona, Minnesota river terminal with a contract expiring in 2011, the Chauffeurs, Teamsters, Warehousemen and Helpers unions represent 4 employees at our Indianapolis, Indiana crop nutrients facility with a contract expiring in December 2012 and the International Longshoremen’s and Warehousemen’s Union (ILWU) represents 32 employees at our Kalama, Washington export terminal with a contract in place through 2009. Finally, certain employees in our country operations business are represented by collective bargaining agreements with two unions: the BTWGM represents 19 employees in two locations, with contracts expiring in December 2011 and June 2010, and the United Food and Commercial Workers represents 7 employees with a contract expiring in July 2011.

 

We are involved as a defendant in various lawsuits, claims and disputes, which are in the normal course of our business. The resolution of any such matters may affect consolidated net income for any fiscal period; however, our management believes any resulting liabilities, individually or in the aggregate, will not have a material effect on our consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows during any fiscal year.

 

In October 2003, we and NCRA reached agreements with the EPA and the State of Montana’s Department of Environmental Quality and the State of Kansas Department of Health and Environment, regarding the terms of settlements with respect to reducing air emissions at our Laurel, Montana and NCRA’s McPherson, Kansas refineries. These settlements are part of a series of similar settlements that the EPA has negotiated with major refiners under the EPA’s Petroleum Refinery Initiative. The settlements take the form of consent decrees filed with the U.S. District Court for the District of Montana (Billings Division) and the U.S. District Court for the District of Kansas. Each consent decree details potential capital improvements,

supplemental environmental projects and operational changes that we and NCRA have agreed to implement at the relevant refinery over several years. The consent decrees also required us, and NCRA, to pay approximately $0.5 million in aggregate civil cash penalties. As of August 31, 2009, the aggregate capital expenditures for us and NCRA related to these settlements was approximately $37 million, and we anticipate spending an additional $3 million over the next few years. We do not believe that the settlements will have a material adverse affect on us or NCRA.

 

We own or lease energy, agronomy, grain handling and processing facilities throughout the United States. Below is a summary of these locations.

 

Energy

 

Facilities in our Energy segment include the following, all of which are owned except where indicated as leased:

 

 

We have a 74.5% interest in NCRA, which owns and operates the following facilities:

 

 

Ag Business

 

Within our Ag Business segment, we own or lease the following facilities:

 

Crop Nutrients

 

We use ports and terminals in our crop nutrients operations at the following locations:

 

Briggs, Indiana (terminal, owned)

Crescent City, Illinois (terminal, owned)

Crestline, Ohio (terminal, owned)

Fostoria, Ohio (terminal, owned)

Galveston, Texas (deep water port, land leased from port authority)

Grand Forks, North Dakota (terminal, owned)

Green Bay, Wisconsin (terminal, owned)

Indianapolis, Indiana (terminal, leased)

Little Rock, Arkansas (river terminal, leased)

Memphis, Tennessee (river terminal, owned)

Muscatine, Iowa (river terminal, owned)

Post Falls, Idaho (terminal, owned)

St. Paul, Minnesota (river terminal, owned)

Watertown, South Dakota (terminal, owned)

Winona, Minnesota (2 river terminals, owned)

 

Country Operations

 

In our country operations business, we own 369 agri-operations locations (of which some of the facilities are on leased land), 10 feed manufacturing facilities and 3 sunflower plants located in Colorado, Idaho, Iowa, Kansas, Minnesota, Montana, Nebraska, North Dakota, Oklahoma, Oregon, South Dakota and Washington.

 

Grain Marketing

 

We use grain terminals in our grain marketing operations at the following locations:

 

Collins, Mississippi (owned)

Davenport, Iowa (2 owned)

Friona, Texas (owned)

Kalama, Washington (leased)

Myrtle Grove, Louisiana (owned)

Savage, Minnesota (owned)

Spokane, Washington (owned)

Superior, Wisconsin (owned)

Winona, Minnesota (1 owned, 1 leased)

 

In addition to office space at our corporate headquarters, we have grain marketing offices at the following leased locations:

 

Barcelona, Spain

Buenos Aires, Argentina

Davenport, Iowa

Geneva, Switzerland

Hong Kong

Kansas City, Missouri

Kiev, Ukraine

Lincoln, Nebraska

Sao Paulo, Brazil

Shanghai, China

Vostok, Russia

Winona, Minnesota

 

Processing

 

Within our Processing segment, we own and lease the following facilities:

 

Oilseed Processing

 

We own a campus in Mankato, Minnesota, comprised of a soybean crushing plant, an oilseed refinery, a soyflour plant, a quality control laboratory and an administration office. We also own a crushing plant in Fairmont, Minnesota. In addition, we own a textured soy protein manufacturing plant in Hutchinson, Kansas.

 

Wheat Milling

 

We own five milling facilities at the following locations, all of which are leased to Horizon Milling:

 

Fairmount, North Dakota

Houston, Texas

Kenosha, Wisconsin

Mount Pocono, Pennsylvania

Rush City, Minnesota

 

Corporate and Other

 

Business Solutions

 

In addition to office space at our corporate headquarters, we have offices at the following leased locations:

 

Houston, Texas (Ag States Group)

Indianapolis, Indiana (Ag States Group and Country Hedging, Inc.)

Kansas City, Missouri (Country Hedging, Inc.)

Kewanee, Illinois (Ag States Group)

 

Corporate Headquarters

 

We are headquartered in Inver Grove Heights, Minnesota. We own a 33-acre campus consisting of one main building with approximately 320,000 square feet of office space and two smaller buildings with approximately 13,400 and 9,000 square feet of space.

 

Our internet address is www.chsinc.com.

 

Introduction

 

We are an agricultural membership cooperative organized under Minnesota cooperative law to do business with member and non-member patrons. Our patrons, not us, are subject to income taxes on income from patronage sources, which is distributed to them. We are subject to income taxes on undistributed patronage income and non-patronage-sourced income. See “Tax Treatment” below.

 

Distribution of Net Income; Patronage Dividends

 

We are required by our organizational documents annually to distribute net earnings derived from patronage business with members, after payment of dividends on equity capital, to members on the basis of patronage, except that the Board of Directors may elect to retain and add to our unallocated capital reserve an amount not to exceed 10% of the distributable net income from patronage business. We may also distribute net income derived from patronage business with a non-member if we have agreed to conduct business with the non-member on a patronage basis. Net income from non-patronage business may be distributed to members or added to the unallocated capital reserve, in whatever proportions the Board of Directors deems appropriate.

These distributions, referred to as “patronage dividends,” may be made in cash, patrons’ equities, revolving fund certificates, our securities, securities of others or any combination designated by the Board of Directors. From fiscal 1998 and through fiscal 2005, the Board of Directors approved the distribution of patronage dividends in the form of 30% cash and 70% patrons’ equities (see “Patrons’ Equities” below). For fiscal 2006 through 2009, the Board of Directors approved the distribution of patronage dividends in the form of 35% cash and 65% patrons’ equities. The Board of Directors may change the mix in the form of the patronage dividends in the future. In making distributions, the Board of Directors may use any method of allocation that, in its judgment, is reasonable and equitable.

 

Patronage dividends distributed during the years ended August 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007, were $648.9 million ($227.6 million in cash), $557.2 million ($195.0 million in cash) and $379.9 million ($133.1 million in cash), respectively.

 

By action of the Board of Directors, patronage losses incurred in fiscal 2009 from our wholesale crop nutrients business, totaling approximately $60.0 million, will be offset against capital equity certificates issued as the result of fiscal 2008 wholesale crop nutrients operating earnings and the gain on the sale of our CF Industries stock.

 

Patrons’ Equities

 

Patrons’ equities are in the form of book entries and represent a right to receive cash or other property when we redeem them. Patrons’ equities form part of our capital, do not bear interest, and are not subject to redemption upon request of a member. Patrons’ equities are redeemable only at the discretion of the Board of Directors and in accordance with the terms of the redemption policy adopted by the Board of Directors, which may be modified at any time without member consent. Redemptions of capital equity certificates approved by the Board of Directors are divided into two pools, one for non-individuals (primarily member cooperatives) who may participate in an annual pro-rata program for equities held by them and another for individuals who are eligible for equity redemptions at age 70 or upon death. The amount that each non-individual receives under the pro-rata program in any year will be determined by multiplying the dollars available for pro-rata redemptions, if any that year, as determined by the Board of Directors, by a fraction, the numerator of which is the face value of patronage certificates eligible for redemption held by them, and the denominator of which is the sum of the patronage certificates eligible for redemption held by all eligible holders of patronage certificates that are not individuals. In addition to the annual pro-rata program, the Board of Directors approved additional equity redemptions to non-individuals in prior years targeting older capital equity certificates which were redeemed in cash in fiscal 2008 and 2007. In accordance with authorization from the Board of Directors, we expect total redemptions related to the year ended August 31, 2009, that will be distributed in fiscal 2010, to be approximately $50.1 million.

 

Cash redemptions of patrons and other equities during the years ended August 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007 were $49.7 million, $81.8 million and $70.8 million, respectively. An additional $49.9 million, $46.4 million and $35.9 million of equities were redeemed by issuance of shares of our 8% Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock during the years ended August 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007, respectively.

 

Governance

 

We are managed by a Board of Directors of not less than 17 persons elected by the members at our annual meeting. Terms of directors are staggered so that no more than six directors are elected in any year. The Board of Directors is currently composed of 17 directors. Our articles of incorporation and bylaws may be amended only upon approval of a majority of the votes cast at an annual or special meeting of our members, except for the higher vote described under “Certain Antitakeover Measures” below.

Membership

 

Membership in CHS is restricted to certain producers of agricultural products and to associations of producers of agricultural products that are organized and operating so as to adhere to the provisions of the Agricultural Marketing Act and the Capper-Volstead Act, as amended. The Board of Directors may establish other qualifications for membership, as it may from time to time deem advisable.

 

As a membership cooperative, we do not have common stock. We may issue equity or debt instruments, on a patronage basis or otherwise, to our members. We have two classes of outstanding membership. Individual members are individuals actually engaged in the production of agricultural products. Cooperative associations are associations of agricultural producers and may be either cooperatives or other associations organized and operated under the provisions of the Agricultural Marketing Act and the Capper-Volstead Act, as amended.

 

Voting Rights

 

Voting rights arise by virtue of membership in CHS, not because of ownership of any equity or debt instruments. Members that are cooperative associations are entitled to vote based upon a formula that takes into account the equity held by the cooperative in CHS and the average amount of business done with us over the previous three years.

 

Members who are individuals are entitled to one vote each. Individual members may exercise their voting power directly or through patrons’ associations affiliated with a grain elevator, feed mill, seed plant or any other of our facilities (with certain historical exceptions) recognized by the Board of Directors. The number of votes of patrons’ associations is determined under the same formula as cooperative association members.

 

Most matters submitted to a vote of the members require the approval of a majority of the votes cast at a meeting of the members, although certain actions require a greater vote. See “Certain Antitakeover Measures” below.

 

Debt and Equity Instruments

 

We may issue debt and equity instruments to our current members and patrons, on a patronage basis or otherwise, and to persons who are neither members nor patrons. Capital Equity Certificates issued by us are subject to a first lien in favor of us for all indebtedness of the holder to us. On August 31, 2009, our outstanding capital includes patrons’ equities (consisting of Capital Equity Certificates and Non-patronage Equity Certificates), 8% Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock and certain capital reserves.

 

Distribution of Assets upon Dissolution; Merger and Consolidation

 

In the event of our dissolution, liquidation or winding up, whether voluntary or involuntary, all of our debts and liabilities would be paid first according to their respective priorities. After such payment, the holders of each share of our preferred stock would then be entitled to receive out of available assets, up to $25.00 per share, plus all dividends accumulated and unpaid on that share, whether or not declared, to and including the date of distribution. This distribution to the holders of our preferred stock would be made before any payment is made or assets distributed to the holders of any security that ranks junior to the preferred stock but after the payment of the liquidation preference of any of our securities that rank senior to the preferred stock. After such distribution to the holders of equity capital, any excess would be paid to patrons on the basis of their past patronage with us. Our bylaws provide for the allocation among our members and nonmember patrons of the consideration received in any merger or consolidation to which we are a party.

 

Certain Antitakeover Measures

 

Our governing documents may be amended upon the approval of a majority of the votes cast at an annual or special meeting. However, if the Board of Directors, in its sole discretion, declares that a proposed amendment to our governing documents involves or is related to a “hostile takeover,” the amendment must be adopted by 80% of the total voting power of our members.

The approval of not less than two-thirds of the votes cast at a meeting is required to approve a “change of control” transaction which would include a merger, consolidation, liquidation, dissolution or sale of all or substantially all of our assets. If the Board of Directors determines that a proposed change of control transaction involves a hostile takeover, the 80% approval requirement applies. The term “hostile takeover” is not further defined in the Minnesota cooperative law or our governing documents.

 

Tax Treatment

 

Subchapter T of the Internal Revenue Code sets forth rules for the tax treatment of cooperatives and applies to both cooperatives exempt from taxation under Section 521 of the Internal Revenue Code and to nonexempt corporations operating on a cooperative basis. We are a nonexempt cooperative.

 

As a cooperative, we are not taxed on qualified patronage (minimum cash requirement of 20%) allocated to our members either in the form of equities or cash. Consequently, those amounts are taxed only at the patron level. However, the amounts of any allocated but undistributed patronage earnings (called non-qualified written notices of allocation) are taxable to us when allocated. Upon redemption of any non-qualified written notices of allocation, the amount is deductible to us and taxable to the member.

 

Income derived by us from non-patronage sources is not entitled to the “single tax” benefit of Subchapter T and is taxed to us at corporate income tax rates.

 

NCRA is not consolidated for tax purposes.

 

The selected financial information below has been derived from our consolidated financial statements for the years ended August 31. The selected consolidated financial information for August 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007, should be read in conjunction with our consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included elsewhere in this filing. In May 2005, we sold the majority of our Mexican foods business and have recorded the Mexican foods business as discontinued operations.

 

Summary Consolidated Financial Data

 

 

 

 

The selected financial information below has been derived from our three business segments, and Corporate and Other, for the fiscal years ended August 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007. The intercompany revenues between segments were $294.3 million, $359.8 million and $247.7 million for the fiscal years ended August 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007, respectively.

 

Summary Financial Data By Business Segment

 

 

Supplementary Financial Information

 

Supplementary financial information required by Item 302 of Regulation S-K for each quarter during the years ended August 31, 2009 and 2008 is presented below.

 

 

 

Overview

 

CHS Inc. (CHS, we or us) is a diversified company, which provides grain, foods and energy resources to businesses and consumers on a global basis. As a cooperative, we are owned by farmers, ranchers and their member cooperatives across the United States. We also have preferred stockholders that own shares of our 8% Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock.

 

We provide a full range of production agricultural inputs such as refined fuels, propane, farm supplies, animal nutrition and agronomy products, as well as services, which include hedging, financing and insurance. We own and operate petroleum refineries and pipelines and market and distribute refined fuels and other energy products under the Cenex^® brand through a network of member cooperatives and independent retailers. We purchase grains and oilseeds directly and indirectly from agricultural producers primarily in the midwestern and western United States. These grains and oilseeds are either sold to domestic and international customers, or further processed into a variety of grain-based food products.

 

We have aligned our segments based on an assessment of how our businesses operate and the products and services they sell. Our three segments: Energy, Ag Business and Processing, create vertical integration to link producers with consumers. Our Energy segment produces and provides primarily for the wholesale distribution of petroleum products and transports those products. Our Ag Business segment purchases and resells grains and oilseeds originated by our country operations business, by our member cooperatives and by third parties, and also serves as wholesaler and retailer of crop inputs. Our Processing segment converts grains and oilseeds into value-added products.

 

Summary data for each of our segments for the fiscal years ended August 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007, is provided in the Selected Consolidated Financial Data section of this prospectus. Except as otherwise specified, references to years indicate our fiscal year ended August 31, 2009, or ended August 31 of the year referenced.

 

Corporate administrative expenses are allocated to all three segments, and Corporate and Other, based on either direct usage for services that can be tracked, such as information technology and legal, and other factors or considerations relevant to the costs incurred.

 

Many of our business activities are highly seasonal and operating results will vary throughout the year. Overall, our income is generally lowest during the second fiscal quarter and highest during the third fiscal quarter. Our segments are subject to varying seasonal fluctuations. For example, in our Ag Business segment, our retail agronomy, wholesale crop nutrients and country operations businesses generally experience higher volumes and income during the spring planting season and in the fall, which corresponds to harvest. Also in our Ag Business segment, our grain marketing operations are subject to fluctuations in volume and earnings based on producer harvests, world grain prices and demand. Our Energy segment generally experiences higher volumes and profitability in certain operating areas, such as refined products, in the summer and early fall when gasoline and diesel fuel usage is highest and is subject to global supply and demand forces. Other energy products, such as propane, may experience higher volumes and profitability during the winter heating and crop drying seasons.

 

Our revenues, assets and cash flows can be significantly affected by global market prices for commodities such as petroleum products, natural gas, grains, oilseeds, crop nutrients and flour. Changes in market prices for commodities that we purchase without a corresponding change in the selling prices of those products can affect revenues and operating earnings. Commodity prices are affected by a wide range of factors beyond our control, including the weather, crop damage due to disease or insects, drought, the availability and adequacy of supply, government regulations and policies, world events and general political and economic conditions.

 

While our revenues and operating results are derived from businesses and operations which are wholly-owned and majority-owned, a portion of our business operations are conducted through companies in which we hold ownership interests of 50% or less and do not control the operations. We account for these investments primarily using the equity method of accounting, wherein we record our proportionate share of

income or loss reported by the entity as equity income from investments, without consolidating the revenues and expenses of the entity in our Consolidated Statements of Operations. These investments principally include our 50% ownership in each of the following companies: Agriliance LLC (Agriliance), TEMCO, LLC (TEMCO) and United Harvest, LLC (United Harvest), and our 39.35% ownership in Multigrain S.A. included in our Ag Business segment; our 50% ownership in Ventura Foods, LLC (Ventura Foods), our 24% ownership in Horizon Milling, LLC (Horizon Milling) and Horizon Milling G.P., included in our Processing segment.

 

The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of CHS and all of our wholly-owned and majority-owned subsidiaries, including the National Cooperative Refinery Association (NCRA), which is in our Energy segment. All significant intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated.

 

Recent Events

 

We have explored with Land O’Lakes, Inc. (Land O’Lakes), the repositioning options of the Agriliance retail business. Subsequent to the end of fiscal 2009, we have, along with Land O’Lakes, sold or reached agreement to sell a substantial number of the Agriliance retail facilities to various third parties, as well as to us and to Land O’Lakes. Sales which have not yet closed are anticipated to close on or before December 31, 2009. We expect to receive cash distributions from Agriliance for proceeds related to these transactions of approximately $50.0 million, net of what we pay for the assets we acquire. We are still attempting to reposition the remaining Agriliance facilities located primarily in Florida.

 

Results of Operations

 

Comparison of the years ended August 31, 2009 and 2008

 

General.  We recorded income before income taxes of $443.9 million in fiscal 2009 compared to $874.6 million in fiscal 2008, a decrease of $430.7 million (49%). These results reflected decreased pretax earnings in our Ag Business segment and Corporate and Other, while our Energy and Processing segments reflected increased pretax earnings.

 

Our Energy segment generated income before income taxes of $359.6 million for the year ended August 31, 2009 compared to $299.7 million in fiscal 2008. This increase in earnings of $59.9 million (20%) is primarily from higher margins on refined fuels mostly from our Laurel, Montana refinery, where during fiscal 2008 we completed a coker project along with other refinery improvements, which allowed us to extract a greater volume of high value gasoline and diesel fuel and less relatively low value asphalt. In addition, during fiscal 2009 we sold 180,000 shares of our NYMEX Holdings common stock for proceeds of $16.1 million and recorded a pretax gain of $15.7 million. Earnings in propane and petroleum equipment businesses also improved during fiscal 2009 compared to fiscal 2008, while our lubricants, transportation and renewable fuels marketing operations experienced lower earnings.

 

Our Ag Business segment generated income before income taxes of $73.1 million for the year ended August 31, 2009 compared to $568.3 million in fiscal 2008, a decrease in earnings of $495.2 million (87%). During fiscal 2008, we sold all of our remaining 1,610,396 shares of CF Industries Holdings, Inc. (CF) stock, a domestic fertilizer manufacturer, in which we held a minority interest, and for which we received proceeds of $108.3 million and recorded a pretax gain of $91.7 million. During the first quarter of fiscal 2008, we received the crop nutrients business of Agriliance, an agronomy joint venture in which we hold a 50% interest, through a distribution of assets to us. Prior to the distribution, we reflected 50% of these earnings through our equity income from our investment in Agriliance. Due to the distribution by Agriliance of the wholesale and some of the retail businesses to us and Land O’Lakes, the operating performance remaining within the Agriliance operations for fiscal 2009 and 2008 is primarily their retail business. Earnings from our wholesale crop nutrients business are $235.8 million less for fiscal 2009 compared with fiscal 2008. The market for crop nutrients products fell significantly during fiscal 2009 as fertilizer prices, an input to grain production, followed the declining grain prices. During the late fall of 2008, rains impeded the application of fertilizer and, as a result, we had a higher quantity of inventories on hand at the end of our first fiscal quarter than is typical at that time of year. Because there are no futures contracts or other derivatives that can be used to hedge fertilizer inventories and contracts effectively, an inventory long position with falling prices, creates

losses. Depreciation in fertilizer prices continued throughout fiscal 2009, which had the effect of dramatically reducing gross margins on this product. The 2009 spring fertilizer volumes also declined compared to the prior year because of inclement weather that again delayed the application season, and because producers were reluctant to buy fertilizer when the price was still in a rapid decline. This situation was just the opposite during fiscal 2008 when fertilizer prices appreciated rapidly and the market produced significantly higher margins on inventory that had been purchased at relatively low prices. To reflect our wholesale crop nutrients inventories at net realizable values, we made lower-of-cost or market adjustments during fiscal 2009 totaling approximately $92 million, of which $8.6 million remained at August 31, 2009. Reduced performance by Agriliance, partially offset by a net gain on the sale of a Canadian agronomy equity investment resulted in a $10.6 million net decrease in earnings from these investments, net of allocated internal expenses. As previously discussed, we anticipate the repositioning of the majority of the remaining Agriliance retail operations to occur during fiscal 2010. Our grain marketing earnings decreased by $123.0 million during fiscal 2009 when compared to fiscal 2008, primarily the result of lower grain margins and reduced earnings from joint ventures. Volatility in the grain markets created exceptional opportunities for grain margins during fiscal 2008, while reduced demand as a result of the world-wide recession lessened those opportunities during fiscal 2009. Our country operations earnings decreased $34.1 million in fiscal 2009, primarily as a result of reduced grain and crop nutrients margins.

 

Our Processing segment generated income before income taxes of $4.1 million for the year ended August 31, 2009, compared to a net loss of $5.8 million in fiscal 2008, an improvement in earnings of $9.9 million. Our share of losses, net of allocated internal expenses, related to US BioEnergy Corporation (US BioEnergy), an ethanol manufacturing company in which we held a minority ownership interest, increased $4.1 million for fiscal 2009 compared to fiscal 2008. Effective April 1, 2008, US BioEnergy and VeraSun Energy Corporation (VeraSun) completed a merger, and as a result of our change in ownership interest, we no longer had significant influence, and therefore no longer accounted for VeraSun, the surviving entity, using the equity method. During fiscal 2009, we reflected a $74.3 million loss on our investment in VeraSun, which declared bankruptcy in October 2008. The write-off eliminated our remaining investment, as we had reflected an impairment of $71.7 million during fiscal 2008 based on the market value of the VeraSun stock on August 31, 2008. Further discussion is contained below in “Loss (Gain) on Investments.” Oilseed processing earnings decreased $14.5 million during fiscal 2009 compared to fiscal 2008, primarily due to reduced margins and volumes in our crushing operations, partially offset by improved margins in our refining operations. Our share of earnings from our wheat milling joint ventures, net of allocated internal expenses, decreased $19.0 million in fiscal 2009 compared to fiscal 2008, primarily the result of reduced margins on the products sold. Our share of earnings from Ventura Foods, our packaged foods joint venture, net of allocated internal expenses, reflected an increase of $47.5 million during fiscal 2009 compared to fiscal 2008, primarily as the result of decreased commodity prices for inputs improving margins on the products sold.

 

Corporate and Other generated income before income taxes of $7.2 million for the year ended August 31, 2009 compared to $12.3 million in fiscal 2008, which represented a decrease in earnings of $5.1 million (42%). This decrease is attributable to less activity in our business solutions’ financial and hedging services and a soft insurance market for our insurance services.

 

Net Income.  Consolidated net income for the year ended August 31, 2009 was $381.4 million compared to $803.0 million for fiscal 2008, which represented a $421.6 million (53%) decrease.

 

Revenues.  Consolidated revenues of $25.7 billion for the year ended August 31, 2009 compared to $32.2 billion for fiscal 2008, which represented a $6.5 billion (20%) decrease.

 

Total revenues include “other revenues” generated primarily within our Ag Business segment and Corporate and Other. Our Ag Business segment’s country operations elevators and agri-service centers derive other revenues from activities related to production agriculture, which includes grain storage, grain cleaning, fertilizer spreading, crop protection spraying and other services of this nature, and our grain marketing operations receive other revenues at our export terminals from activities related to loading vessels. Corporate and Other derives revenues primarily from our financing, hedging and insurance operations.

Our Energy segment revenues, after elimination of intersegment revenues, of $7.4 billion decreased by $3.8 billion (34%) during the year ended August 31, 2009 compared to fiscal 2008. During the years ended August 31, 2009 and 2008, our Energy segment recorded revenues from our Ag Business segment of $251.6 million and $322.5 million, respectively, which are eliminated as part of the consolidation process. The net decrease in revenues of $3.8 billion is comprised of a net decrease of $3.2 billion related to lower prices on refined fuels, propane and renewable fuels marketing products and $0.6 billion primarily related to a decrease in sales volume in our renewable fuels marketing operations. Refined fuels revenues decreased $3.0 billion (38%), of which $2.8 billion was related to a net average selling price decrease and $149.8 million was attributable to slightly decreased volumes, compared to fiscal 2008. The average selling price of refined fuels decreased $1.07 per gallon (36%) and volumes decreased 2% when comparing fiscal 2009 with fiscal 2008. Renewable fuels marketing revenues decreased $549.7 million (48%), mostly from a 35% decrease in volumes, coupled with a decrease in the average selling price of $0.44 per gallon (20%), when compared with fiscal 2008. The decrease in renewable fuels marketing volumes was primarily attributable to the loss of two customers. Propane revenues increased by $7.2 million (1%), of which $145.2 million related to an increase in volumes, partially offset by a decrease of $138.0 million due to a lower average selling price, when compared to fiscal 2008. Propane sales volume increased 20%, while the average selling price decreased $0.23 per gallon (16%) compared to fiscal 2008. The increase in propane volumes primarily reflects increased demand caused by an improved crop drying season, lower prices and a longer home heating season.

 

Our Ag Business segment revenues, after elimination of intersegment revenues, of $17.2 billion decreased $2.5 billion (13%) during the year ended August 31, 2009 compared to fiscal 2008. Grain revenues in our Ag Business segment totaled $13.0 billion and $15.0 billion during the years ended August 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively. Of the grain revenues decrease of $2.0 billion (13%), $2.3 billion is attributable to decreased average grain selling prices, partially offset by an increase of $339.5 million due to increased volumes during fiscal 2009 compared to fiscal 2008. The average sales price of all grain and oilseed commodities sold reflected a decrease of $1.28 per bushel (15%). The average month-end market price per bushel of spring wheat, soybeans and corn decreased approximately $4.55, $2.44 and $1.38, respectively, when compared to the prices of those same grains for fiscal 2008. Volumes increased 2% during fiscal 2009 compared with fiscal 2008. Soybeans reflected a fiscal 2009 fourth quarter volume rally in bushels sold and exceeded last year, partially offset by decreased volumes of wheat, durum and barley, compared to fiscal 2008. Both price declines and relatively flat volumes are reflective of reduced demand as a result of the world-wide recession.

 

In September 2007, we began recording revenues from the distributed crop nutrients business of Agriliance, while in the past that investment had been accounted for under the equity method of accounting. Wholesale crop nutrient revenues in our Ag Business segment totaled $2.0 billion and $2.7 billion during the years ended August 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively. Of the wholesale crop nutrient revenues decrease of $648.6 million (24%), $676.7 million is attributable to decreased volumes, partially offset by an increase of $28.1 million due to increased average fertilizer selling prices during fiscal 2009 compared to fiscal 2008. This slightly favorable price variance was created by high priced sales contracts with customers before the collapse in crop nutrient prices in the fall of 2008. The average sales price of all fertilizers sold reflected an increase of $6 per ton (1%) compared with fiscal 2008. Volumes decreased 25% during the year ended August 31, 2009, compared with fiscal 2008, mainly due to higher and volatile fertilizer prices and adverse weather conditions during the fall of 2008 and spring of 2009.

 

Our Ag Business segment non-grain and non-wholesale crop nutrients product revenues of $1.9 billion increased by $34.5 million (2%) during fiscal 2009 compared to fiscal 2008, primarily on account of increased revenues of retail crop nutrients, crop protection, seed, feed and processed sunflower products, partially offset by decreased prices in retail energy. This revenue increase was driven by incremental volumes sold through facilities acquired during fiscal 2009. Other revenues within our Ag Business segment of $209.4 million during fiscal 2009 increased $32.0 million (18%) compared to fiscal 2008, primarily from grain handling and service revenues.

 

Our Processing segment revenues, after elimination of intersegment revenues, of $1.1 billion decreased $159.0 million (12%) during the year ended August 31, 2009 compared to fiscal 2008. Because our wheat milling and packaged foods operations are conducted through non-consolidated joint ventures, sales revenues

reported in our Processing segment consist entirely of revenue generated in our oilseed processing operations. Oilseed crushing revenues decreased $103.2 million (15%), of which $82.1 million was due to a 12% net decrease in sales volume and $21.1 million was related to lower average sales prices. Oilseed refining revenues decreased $65.8 million (11%), of which $39.9 million was due to lower average sales prices and $25.9 million was due to a 4% decrease in sales volume. The average selling price of processed soymeal decreased $11 per ton (4%) and the average selling price of refined soybean oil decreased $0.04 per pound (7%) compared to fiscal 2008. The changes in the average selling price of products are primarily driven by the lower market price of soybeans.

 

Cost of Goods Sold.  Consolidated cost of goods sold of $24.8 billion for the year ended August 31, 2009 compared to $31.0 billion for fiscal 2008, which represents a $6.2 billion (20%) decrease.

 

Our Energy segment cost of goods sold, after elimination of intersegment costs, of $6.9 billion decreased by $3.8 billion (36%) during the year ended August 31, 2009 compared to fiscal 2008. The decrease in cost of goods sold is primarily due to decreased per unit costs for refined fuels products. Specifically, the average cost of refined fuels decreased $1.09 per gallon (38%), while volumes slightly decreased by 2% compared to fiscal 2008. On average, we process approximately 55,000 barrels of crude oil per day at our Laurel, Montana refinery and 80,000 barrels of crude oil per day at NCRA’s McPherson, Kansas refinery. The average cost decrease is primarily related to lower input costs at our two crude oil refineries and lower average prices for the refined products that we purchased for resale compared to fiscal 2008. The aggregate average per unit cost of crude oil purchased for the two refineries decreased 41% compared to fiscal 2008. Renewable fuels marketing costs decreased $545.4 million (48%), mostly from a 35% decrease in volumes driven by the loss of two customers, in addition to a decrease in the average cost of $0.44 per gallon (20%), when compared to fiscal 2008. The average cost of propane decreased $0.24 per gallon (16%), while volumes increased 20% compared to fiscal 2008. The increase in propane volumes primarily reflects increased demand caused by an improved crop drying season, lower prices and a more favorable home heating season.

 

Our Ag Business segment cost of goods sold, after elimination of intersegment costs, of $16.9 billion decreased $2.2 billion (11%) during the year ended August 31, 2009 compared to fiscal 2008. Grain cost of goods sold in our Ag Business segment totaled $12.7 billion and $14.6 billion during the years ended August 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively. The cost of grains and oilseed procured through our Ag Business segment decreased $1.9 billion (13%) compared to fiscal 2008, which was primarily the result of a $1.24 (15%) decrease in the average cost per bushel, partially offset by a 2% net increase in bushels purchased as compared to fiscal 2008. Wheat, durum and barley volumes decreased while soybeans volumes increased compared to fiscal 2008.

 

In September 2007, we began recording cost of goods sold from the distributed crop nutrients business of Agriliance. Prior to that date, this investment had been accounted for under the equity method of accounting. Wholesale crop nutrients cost of goods sold in our Ag Business segment totaled $2.1 billion and $2.5 billion during the years ended August 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively. This decrease of $408.8 million (17%) was partially offset by additional costs of goods sold of approximately $92 million due to lower-of-cost or market adjustments on inventories. The average cost per ton of fertilizer increased $49 (12%), while net volumes decreased 25% when compared to fiscal 2008. The net volume decrease is mainly due to higher and volatile prices and inclement fall and spring weather, which made it difficult for farmers to apply fertilizers.

 

Our Ag Business segment cost of goods sold, excluding the cost of grains and wholesale crop nutrients procured through this segment, increased during the year ended August 31, 2009 compared to fiscal 2008, primarily due to volumes sold with our recent acquisitions.

 

Our Processing segment cost of goods sold, after elimination of intersegment costs, of $1.1 billion, decreased $144.2 million (12%) during the year ended August 31, 2009 compared to fiscal 2008 primarily due to decreased costs of soybeans and decreased volumes.

 

Marketing, General and Administrative.  Marketing, general and administrative expenses of $355.3 million for the year ended August 31, 2009 increased by $25.3 million (8%) compared to fiscal 2008.

The net increase of $25.3 million includes $7.6 million related to consolidating Cofina Financial, expansion of foreign operations within our Ag Business segment, other acquisitions and general inflation.

 

Loss (Gain) on Investments.  We incurred a net loss on investments of $56.3 million for the year ended August 31, 2009, compared to a net gain on investments of $29.2 million during fiscal 2008. During fiscal 2009, we recorded a $74.3 million loss on our investments in VeraSun in our Processing segment due to its bankruptcy, which was partially offset by a gain on investments in our Energy segment as we had sold 180,000 of our shares of NYMEX Holdings common stock for proceeds of $16.1 million and recorded a pretax gain of $15.7 million. Also during fiscal 2009, included in our Ag Business segment were net gains on investments sold of $2.3 million.

 

As reported in our Ag Business segment for fiscal 2008, we sold all of our remaining shares of CF stock, which generated proceeds of $108.3 million and a pretax gain of $91.7 million. Also during fiscal 2008, included in our Energy and Ag Business segments and Corporate and Other were other gains on securities sold of $35 thousand, $9.1 million and $0.9 million, respectively, which were partially offset by losses on investments of $72.6 million in our Processing segment. During fiscal 2008, we recorded an impairment of our investment in VeraSun of $71.7 million based on VeraSun’s market value of $5.76 per share on August 29, 2008.

 

Interest, net.  Net interest of $70.5 million for the year ended August 31, 2009 decreased $6.0 million (8%) compared to fiscal 2008. Interest expense for the years ended August 31, 2009 and 2008 was $85.7 million and $100.1 million, respectively. The interest expense decrease of $14.4 million (14%) is after the effect of an additional $9.3 million of interest expense resulting from the consolidation of Cofina Financial. Through August 31, 2008, we held a 49% ownership interest in Cofina Financial and accounted for our investment using the equity method of accounting. On September 1, 2008, we purchased the 51% ownership interest held by our joint venture partner. The increase in interest expense related to Cofina Financial to finance its loan portfolio was more than offset by decreases in the average short-term interest rate and short-term borrowing volume used to finance our remaining operations. The average short-term interest rate decreased 3.38% (81%) for loans, excluding Cofina Financial, and the average level of short-term borrowings decreased $485.6 million (89%) during the year ended August 31, 2009 compared to fiscal 2008, primarily due to significantly reduced working capital needs resulting from lower commodity prices. For the years ended August 31, 2009 and 2008, we capitalized interest of $5.2 million and $9.8 million, respectively, primarily related to construction projects in our Energy segment. The decrease in capitalized interest reflects the completion of our Laurel, Montana coker project during fiscal 2008. Interest income, generated primarily from marketable securities, was $10.0 million and $13.9 million for the years ended August 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively. The net decrease in interest income of $3.9 million (28%) was mostly at NCRA within our Energy segment, which primarily relates to marketable securities with interest yields considerably lower than a year ago.

 

Equity Income from Investments.  Equity income from investments of $105.8 million for the year ended August 31, 2009 decreased $44.6 million (30%) compared to fiscal 2008. We record equity income or loss from the investments in which we have an ownership interest of 50% or less and have significant influence, but not control, for our proportionate share of income or loss reported by the entity, without consolidating the revenues and expenses of the entity in our Consolidated Statements of Operations. The net decrease in equity income from investments was attributable to reduced earnings from investments in our Ag Business and Energy segments and Corporate and Other of $64.8 million, $1.0 million and $4.7 million, respectively, partially offset by improved net earnings in our Processing segment of $25.9 million.

 

Our Ag Business segment reflected reduced equity investment earnings of $64.8 million. Our share of equity investment earnings or losses in agronomy decreased earnings by $12.2 million primarily from reduced southern retail margins. During fiscal 2008, our grain marketing export joint ventures generated large earnings due to strong global demand, while fiscal 2009 earnings in these same joint ventures returned to more normal levels, resulting in a net decrease of $51.4 million during fiscal 2009. Our country operations business reported an aggregate decrease in equity investment earnings of $1.2 million from several small equity investments.

Our Processing segment reflected improved equity investment earnings of $25.9 million. Ventura Foods, our vegetable oil-based products and packaged foods joint venture, recorded improved equity investment earnings of $47.0 million compared to fiscal 2008. Ventura Foods’ increase in earnings was primarily due to lower commodity prices for inputs, resulting in improved margins on the products sold. Horizon Milling, our domestic and Canadian wheat milling joint venture, along with a small milling investment recorded combined reduced equity investment earnings of $19.3 million compared to fiscal 2008. Volatility in the grain markets created wheat procurement opportunities, which increased margins for Horizon Milling during fiscal 2008, while this profit opportunity has been generally limited to normal milling margins during fiscal 2009. During fiscal 2008, we recorded equity earnings of $1.8 million related to US BioEnergy, an ethanol manufacturing company in which we held a minority ownership interest. Effective April 1, 2008, US BioEnergy and VeraSun completed a merger, and as a result of our change in ownership interest we no longer had significant influence and therefore no longer recognized income or losses under the equity method of accounting. At the end of fiscal 2009, we no longer held any investment in this company.

 

Our Energy segment reflected reduced equity investment earnings of $1.0 million related to reduced margins in an equity investment held by NCRA.

 

Corporate and Other reflected reduced equity investment earnings of $4.7 million, as compared to fiscal 2008, primarily due to our consolidation of Cofina Financial which in fiscal 2008 had been reported under the equity method of accounting.

 

Minority Interests.  Minority interests of $59.8 million for the year ended August 31, 2009 decreased by $12.4 million (17%) compared to fiscal 2008. This net decrease was a result of less profitable operations within our majority-owned subsidiaries compared to fiscal 2008. Substantially all minority interests relate to NCRA, an approximately 74.5% owned subsidiary, which we consolidate in our Energy segment.

 

Income Taxes.  Income tax expense of $62.5 million for the year ended August 31, 2009 compared with $71.5 million for fiscal 2008, which resulted in effective tax rates of 14.1% and 8.2%, respectively. The federal and state statutory rate applied to nonpatronage business activity was 38.9% for the years ended August 31, 2009 and 2008. The income taxes and effective tax rate vary each year based upon profitability and nonpatronage business activity during each of the comparable years.

 

Comparison of the years ended August 31, 2008 and 2007

 

General.  We recorded income before income taxes of $874.6 million in fiscal 2008 compared to $797.4 million in fiscal 2007, an increase of $77.2 million (10%). These results reflected increased pretax earnings in our Ag Business segment, and Corporate and Other, while our Energy and Processing segments reflected decreased pretax earnings.

 

Our Energy segment generated income before income taxes of $299.7 million for the year ended August 31, 2008 compared to $613.3 million in fiscal 2007. This decrease in earnings of $313.6 million (51%) is primarily from lower margins at the NCRA refinery in McPherson, Kansas and at our Laurel refinery, in addition to reduced margins on refined fuels from a planned major maintenance project, during which time our production was reduced at our Laurel, Montana refinery. Earnings in our lubricants, renewable fuels marketing, propane and transportation businesses improved during fiscal 2008 when compared to fiscal 2007.

 

Our Ag Business segment generated income before income taxes of $568.3 million for the year ended August 31, 2008 compared to $118.3 million in fiscal 2007, an increase in earnings of $450.0 million (381%). In our first fiscal quarter of 2007, we sold approximately 25% of our investment in CF, a domestic fertilizer manufacturer in which we held a minority interest, for which we received cash of $10.9 million and recorded a gain of $5.3 million. During the first quarter of fiscal 2008, we sold all of our remaining shares of CF stock for proceeds of $108.3 million and recorded a pretax gain of $91.7 million. As previously discussed, during the first quarter of fiscal 2008, we received the crop nutrients business of Agriliance through a distribution of assets to us. This business generated $137.5 million in pretax earnings for fiscal 2008, as the result of strong demand for fertilizer and appreciating prices. Prior to the distribution, we reflected 50% of these earnings through our equity income from our investment in Agriliance. Due to the distribution by Agriliance of the

wholesale and some of the retail businesses to us and Land O’Lakes, the operating performance remaining within the Agriliance operations for fiscal 2008 is primarily their retail business. Our share of the remaining agronomy joint venture earnings, net of allocated internal expenses, was $32.0 million less than in fiscal 2007. Strong demand and increased volumes for grain and oilseed products, much of it driven by increased U.S. ethanol production, contributed to improved performances by our country operations and grain marketing businesses. Our country operations earnings increased $74.5 million, primarily as a result of overall improved product margins, including historically high margins on grain and agronomy transactions. Continued market expansion into Colorado, Oklahoma and Kansas also increased country operations volumes. Our grain marketing operations improved earnings by $183.7 million during fiscal 2008 compared with fiscal 2007, primarily from increased grain volumes and improved margins on those grains. Strong earning performances from our joint ventures also contributed to these improved earnings. Volatility in the grain markets creates opportunities for increased grain margins and increased interest in renewable fuels. Changes in transportation costs, and shifting marketing patterns contributed to this volatility.

 

Our Processing segment generated a net loss before income taxes of $5.8 million for the year ended August 31, 2008, compared to income of $53.6 million in fiscal 2007, a decrease in earnings of $59.4 million (111%). Our share of earnings, net of allocated internal expenses, related to US BioEnergy, an ethanol manufacturing company in which we held a minority ownership interest, decreased $96.1 million for fiscal 2008 compared to fiscal 2007. During the fiscal quarter ended August 31, 2008, we recorded an impairment of $71.7 million to our investment in VeraSun, as previously discussed. Effective April 1, 2008, US BioEnergy and VeraSun completed a merger, and as a result of our change in ownership interest we no longer had significant influence, and therefore no longer recognized income or losses under the equity method of accounting. In August 2006, US BioEnergy filed a registration statement with the Securities and Exchange Commission to register shares of common stock for sale in an initial public offering (IPO), and in December 2006, the IPO was completed. The effect of the issuance of additional shares of US BioEnergy was to dilute our ownership interest down from approximately 25% to 21%. Due to US BioEnergy’s increase in equity, we recognized a non-cash net gain of $15.3 million during fiscal 2007 on our investment to reflect our proportionate share of the increase in the underlying equity of US BioEnergy. Our share of earnings from Ventura Foods, our packaged foods joint venture, net of allocated internal expenses, decreased $15.8 million during fiscal 2008 compared to fiscal 2007, primarily as the result of increased commodity prices reducing margins on the products sold compared to fiscal 2007. Oilseed processing earnings increased $23.5 million during fiscal 2008 compared to fiscal 2007, primarily due to improved margins in our crushing operations, partially offset by slightly reduced margins in our refining operations. Our share of earnings from our wheat milling joint ventures, net of allocated internal expenses, improved by $29.0 million in fiscal 2008 compared to fiscal 2007.

 

Corporate and Other generated income before income taxes of $12.3 million for the year ended August 31, 2008 compared to $12.2 million in fiscal 2007, an increase in earnings of $0.1 million (1%). This improvement was primarily attributable to our business solutions’ financial and hedging services.

 

Net Income.  Consolidated net income for the year ended August 31, 2008 was $803.0 million compared to $756.7 million for the year ended August 31, 2007, which represented a $46.3 million (6%) increase.

 

Revenues.  Consolidated revenues of $32.2 billion for the year ended August 31, 2008 compared to $17.2 billion for the year ended August 31, 2007, which represented a $15.0 billion (87%) increase.

 

Total revenues include “other revenues” generated primarily within our Ag Business segment and Corporate and Other. Our Ag Business segment’s country operations elevators and agri-service centers derive other revenues from activities related to production agriculture, which include grain storage, grain cleaning, fertilizer spreading, crop protection spraying and other services of this nature, and our grain marketing operations receive other revenues at our export terminals from activities related to loading vessels. Corporate and Other derives revenues primarily from our hedging and insurance operations.

 

Our Energy segment revenues, after elimination of intersegment revenues, of $11.2 billion increased by $3.3 billion (42%) during the year ended August 31, 2008 compared to fiscal 2007. During the years ended August 31, 2008 and 2007, our Energy segment recorded revenues from our Ag Business segment of

$322.5 million and $228.9 million, respectively. The net increase in revenues of $3.3 billion is comprised of a net increase of $3.0 billion related to price appreciation, primarily on refined fuels and a $253.7 million net increase in sales volume, primarily on renewable fuels marketing. Refined fuels revenues increased $2.5 billion (46%), of which $2.3 billion was related to a net average selling price increase and $158.3 million was attributable to increased volumes, compared to fiscal 2007. The sales price of refined fuels increased $0.88 per gallon (43%) and volumes increased 2% when comparing fiscal 2008 with fiscal 2007. Higher crude oil prices, strong global demand and limited refining capacity contributed to the increase in refined fuels selling prices. Renewable fuels marketing revenues increased $289.3 million (34%), mostly from a 28% increase in volumes when compared with the same period in the previous year. Propane revenues increased by $148.6 million (25%), of which $199.6 million related to an increase in the net average selling price, and were partially offset by $51.0 million related to a decrease in volumes, when compared to fiscal 2007. Propane sales volume decreased 6% in comparison to the same period of the prior year, while the average selling price increased $0.37 per gallon (34%). Propane prices tend to follow the prices of crude oil and natural gas, both of which increased during fiscal 2008 compared to the same period in 2007. Propane prices are also affected by changes in propane demand and domestic inventory levels. The decrease in propane volumes primarily reflects a loss of crop drying season with less moisture in the fall 2007 harvest and reduced demand due to higher prices.

 

Our Ag Business segment revenues, after elimination of intersegment revenues, of $19.7 billion increased $11.1 billion (130%) during the year ended August 31, 2008 compared to fiscal 2007. Grain revenues in our Ag Business segment totaled $15.0 billion and $7.1 billion during the years ended August 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively. Of the grain revenues increase of $7.8 billion (110%), $3.6 billion is attributable to increased volumes and $4.2 billion is due to increased average grain selling prices during fiscal 2008 compared to fiscal 2007. The average sales price of all grain and oilseed commodities sold reflected an increase of $3.19 per bushel (59%). The 2007 fall harvest produced good yields throughout most of the United States, with the quality of most grains rated as excellent or good. Despite the good harvest, prices for nearly all grain commodities increased because of strong demand, particularly for corn, which is used as the feedstock for most ethanol plants as well as for livestock feed. The average month-end market price per bushel of spring wheat, soybeans and corn increased approximately $5.62, $5.32 and $1.67, respectively, when compared to the prices of those same grains for fiscal 2007. Volumes increased 32% during fiscal 2008 compared with the same period of a year ago. Corn, wheat, soybeans and barley reflected the largest volume increases compared to fiscal 2007. In September 2007, we began recording revenues from the distributed crop nutrients business of Agriliance reflecting $2.7 billion for fiscal 2008. Our Ag Business segment revenues of $1.8 billion for products other than grain and wholesale crop nutrients increased by $554.2 million (43%) during fiscal 2008 compared to the same period in fiscal 2007, primarily the result of increased revenues of retail crop nutrients, energy, crop protection, feed, seed and processed sunflower products. Other revenues within our Ag Business segment of $177.4 million during fiscal 2008 increased $47.2 million (36%) compared to fiscal 2007, primarily from grain handling and service revenues.

 

Our Processing segment revenues, after elimination of intersegment revenues, of $1.3 billion increased $544.5 million (72%) during the year ended August 31, 2008 compared to fiscal 2007. Because our wheat milling and packaged foods operations are through non-consolidated joint ventures, sales revenues reported in our Processing segment are entirely from our oilseed processing operations. Higher average sales prices of processed oilseed increased revenues by $259.4 million, while processed soybean volumes increased 8%, accounting for an increase in revenues of $51.9 million. Oilseed refining revenues increased $216.6 million (60%), of which $220.2 million was due to higher average sales prices and were partially offset by $3.6 million due to a less than 1% decrease in sales volume. Oilseed flour revenues increased $8.0 million (49%). The average selling price of processed oilseed increased $124 per ton (69%) and the average selling price of refined oilseed products increased $0.20 per pound (61%) in fiscal 2008 compared to the same period of fiscal 2007. The changes in the average selling price of products are primarily driven by the higher price of soybeans.

 

Cost of Goods Sold.  Consolidated cost of goods sold of $31.0 billion for the year ended August 31, 2008 compared to $16.1 billion for the year ended August 31, 2007, which represents a $14.9 billion (92%) increase.

Our Energy segment cost of goods sold, after elimination of intersegment costs, of $10.7 billion increased by $3.7 billion (52%) during the year ended August 31, 2008 compared to fiscal 2007. The increase in cost of goods sold was primarily due to increased per unit costs for refined fuels and propane products. On a more product-specific basis, the average cost of refined fuels increased $0.93 per gallon (47%) and volumes increased 2% compared to fiscal 2007. On average we process approximately 55,000 barrels of crude oil per day at our Laurel, Montana refinery and 80,000 barrels of crude oil per day at NCRA’s McPherson, Kansas refinery. The aggregate average cost increase was primarily related to higher input costs at our two crude oil refineries and higher average prices on the refined products that we purchased for resale compared to fiscal 2007. The average per unit cost of crude oil purchased for the two refineries increased 67% compared to fiscal 2007. The average cost of propane increased $0.36 per gallon (33%), while volumes decreased 6% compared to fiscal 2007.

 

Our Ag Business segment cost of goods sold, after elimination of intersegment costs, of $19.1 billion increased $10.7 billion (128%) during the year ended August 31, 2008 compared to fiscal 2007. Grain cost of goods sold in our Ag Business segment totaled $14.6 billion and $7.0 billion during the years ended August 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively. The cost of grains and oilseed procured through our Ag Business segment increased $7.6 billion (108%) compared to fiscal 2007. This was the result of an increase of $3.06 (57%) in the average cost per bushel along with a 32% net increase in bushels sold as compared to the prior year. Corn, wheat, soybeans and barley reflected the largest volume increases compared to fiscal 2007. Commodity prices on spring wheat, soybeans and corn increased compared to the prices that were prevalent during the same period in fiscal 2007. In September 2007, we began recording cost of goods sold from the distributed crop nutrients business of Agriliance reflecting $2.5 billion for the year ended August 31, 2008. Our Ag Business segment cost of goods sold, excluding the cost of grains procured through this segment, increased during the year ended August 31, 2008 compared to fiscal 2007, primarily due to higher volumes and price per unit costs for crop nutrients, energy, feed, crop protection, seed and processed sunflower products. The volume increases resulted primarily from acquisitions made and reflected in the reporting periods.

 

Our Processing segment cost of goods sold, after elimination of intersegment costs, of $1.2 billion, increased $514.5 million (71%) during the year ended August 31, 2008 compared to fiscal 2007, which was primarily due to increased costs of soybeans in addition to volume increases in our soybean crushing operations.

 

Marketing, General and Administrative.  Marketing, general and administrative expenses of $330.0 million for the year ended August 31, 2008 increased by $84.6 million (35%) compared to fiscal 2007. The net increase of $84.6 million includes $35.6 million from our crop nutrients business reflected in our Ag Business segment, which was previously recorded in our equity investment reported earnings of Agriliance. The remaining net change of $49.0 million (20%) includes increased performance-based incentive plan expense, in addition to other employee benefits (primarily medical and pension), general inflation and acquisitions.

 

Gain on Investments.  Gain on investments of $29.2 million for the year ended August 31, 2008, increased by $8.6 million (42%). During fiscal 2007, we sold 540,000 shares of our CF stock, included in our Ag Business segment, for proceeds of $10.9 million, and recorded a pretax gain of $5.3 million, reducing our ownership interest in CF to approximately 2.9%. During fiscal 2008, we sold all of our remaining 1,610,396 shares of CF stock for proceeds of $108.3 million and recorded a pretax gain of $91.7 million. Also during fiscal 2008 included in our Energy and Ag Business segments and Corporate and Other were gains on securities sold of $35 thousand, $9.1 million and $0.9 million, respectively. These gains were partially offset by losses on investments of $72.5 million in our Processing segment. During the fiscal quarter ended August 31, 2008, we recorded an impairment of our investment in VeraSun by $71.7 million, based on VeraSun’s market value of $5.76 per share on August 29, 2008, as previously discussed. Also in August 2006, US BioEnergy, now VeraSun, filed a registration statement with the Securities and Exchange Commission to register shares of common stock for sale in an initial public offering (IPO), and in December 2006, the IPO was completed. The affect of the issuance of additional shares of US BioEnergy was to dilute our ownership interest down from approximately 25% to 21%. Due to US BioEnergy’s increase in equity, we recognized a

non-cash net gain of $15.3 million during fiscal 2007 on our investment to reflect our proportionate share of the increase in the underlying equity of US BioEnergy.

 

Interest, net.  Net interest of $76.5 million for the year ended August 31, 2008 increased $45.4 million (146%) compared to fiscal 2007. Interest expense for the years ended August 31, 2008 and 2007 was $100.1 million and $63.5 million, respectively, reflecting an increase of $36.6 million. The average level of short-term borrowings increased $473.0 million (149%) during the year ended August 31, 2008 compared to fiscal 2007, while the average short-term interest rate decreased 1.70% (30%). Higher commodity prices and increased volumes, primarily within our Ag Business (including the additional working capital needs from our crop nutrients business), and Processing segments, increased those segments’ interest, net by $35.1 million and $7.2 million, respectively. Also, in October 2007, we entered into a private placement with several insurance companies and banks for additional long-term debt in the amount of $400.0 million with an interest rate of 6.18%, which primarily replaced short-term debt. For the years ended August 31, 2008 and 2007, we capitalized interest of $9.8 million and $11.7 million, respectively, primarily related to construction projects in our Energy segment for financing interest on our Laurel, Montana coker project. Interest income, generated primarily from marketable securities, was $13.9 million and $20.7 million for the years ended August 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively. The net decrease in interest income of $6.8 million (33%), was primarily Corporate and Other relating to a decrease of interest income on our hedging and other services, and was partially offset by increased interest income at NCRA within our Energy segment, which primarily relates to marketable securities.

 

Equity Income from Investments.  Equity income from investments of $150.4 million for the year ended August 31, 2008 increased $40.7 million (37%) compared to fiscal 2007. We record equity income or loss from the investments in which we have an ownership interest of 50% or less and have significant influence, but not control, for our proportionate share of income or loss reported by the entity, without consolidating the revenues and expenses of the entity in our Consolidated Statements of Operations. The net increase in equity income from investments was attributable to improved earnings from investments in our Energy, Ag Business and Processing segments, and Corporate and Other. These improvements included $0.6 million for Energy, $31.2 million for Ag Business, $8.2 million for Processing, and $0.7 million for Corporate and Other.

 

Our Ag Business segment generated improved earnings of $31.2 million from equity investments. Our share of equity investment earnings or losses in Agriliance and a Canadian agronomy joint venture decreased earnings by $37.0 million, primarily related to the distribution of their wholesale crop nutrient and crop protection products businesses, partially offset by improved margins for their southern retail operations. In September 2007, Agriliance distributed the assets of the crop nutrients business to us, and the assets of the crop protection business to Land O’Lakes. Agriliance continues to exist as a 50-50 joint venture and primarily operates an agronomy retail distribution business. We had improvements of $65.9 million from our share of equity investment earnings in our grain marketing joint ventures during the year ended August 31, 2008 compared to fiscal 2007. The improvements in earnings of our grain marketing equity investments were primarily related to increased volumes and improved margins on those volumes at export terminals. Our country operations business reported an aggregate increase in equity investment earnings of $2.3 million from several small equity investments.

 

Our Processing segment generated improved earnings of $8.2 million from equity investments. Our equity investment earnings from US BioEnergy, prior to the merger with VeraSun, were $6.7 million less during fiscal 2008 compared to fiscal 2007, primarily from reduced margins resulting from higher input costs. Ventura Foods, our vegetable oil-based products and packaged foods joint venture, recorded reduced earnings of $15.6 million, and Horizon Milling, our domestic and Canadian wheat milling joint ventures, along with a small milling investment, recorded combined improved earnings of $30.5 million, net compared to fiscal 2007. Ventura Foods’ decrease in earnings was primarily due to higher commodity prices resulting in lower margins on the products sold. A shifting demand balance for soybeans for both food and renewable fuels meant addressing supply and price challenges for both CHS and our Ventura Foods joint venture. Horizon Milling’s improved results were related to merchandising margins during our fiscal year ended August 31, 2008. Typically, results are affected by U.S. dietary habits and although the preference for a low carbohydrate diet appears to have reached the bottom of its cycle, milling capacity, which had been idled over the past few years

because of lack of demand for flour products, can easily be put back into production as consumption of flour products increase, which may depress gross margins in the milling industry.

 

Our Energy segment generated increased equity investment earnings of $0.6 million primarily related to improved margins in an equity investment held by NCRA, and Corporate and Other generated improved earnings of $0.7 million from equity investment earnings, primarily from Cofina Financial, our financial services equity investment, as compared to fiscal 2007.

 

Minority Interests.  Minority interests of $72.2 million for the year ended August 31, 2008, decreased by $71.1 million (50%) compared to fiscal 2007. This net decrease was a result of less profitable operations within our majority-owned subsidiaries compared to fiscal 2007. Substantially all minority interests relate to NCRA, an approximately 74.5% owned subsidiary, which we consolidate in our Energy segment.

 

Income Taxes.  Income tax expense of $71.5 million for the year ended August 31, 2008, compares with $40.7 million for fiscal 2007, resulting in effective tax rates of 8.2% and 5.1%, respectively. During the year ended August 31, 2007, we recognized additional tax benefits of $9.6 million related to export incentive credits. The federal and state statutory rate applied to nonpatronage business activity was 38.9% for the years ended August 31, 2008 and 2007. The income taxes and effective tax rate vary each year based upon profitability and nonpatronage business activity during each of the comparable years.

 

Liquidity and Capital Resources

 

On August 31, 2009, we had working capital, defined as current assets less current liabilities, of $1,626.4 million and a current ratio, defined as current assets divided by current liabilities, of 1.5 to 1.0 compared to working capital of $1,738.6 million and a current ratio of 1.4 to 1.0 on August 31, 2008.

 

On August 31, 2009, our committed lines of credit consisted of a five-year revolving facility in the amount of $1.3 billion, which expires in May 2011 and a 364-day revolving facility in the amount of $300.0 million, which expires in February 2010. These credit facilities are established with a syndication of domestic and international banks, and our inventories and receivables financed with them are highly liquid. On August 31, 2009, we had no outstanding amount on our five-year revolving facility compared with $75.0 million outstanding on August 31, 2008. On August 31, 2009 and 2008, we had no amounts outstanding on our 364-day revolving facilities. In addition to these revolving facilities, we have two commercial paper programs totaling $125.0 million with banks participating in our five-year revolving facility. On August 31, 2009 and 2008, we had no commercial paper outstanding. Late summer and early fall are typically our lowest points of seasonal borrowings. Due to the decline in commodity prices during the year ended August 31, 2009, as further discussed in “Cash Flows from Operations,” our average borrowings during the year were much lower in comparison to the year ended August 31, 2008. With our current cash balances and available capacity on our committed lines of credit, we believe that we have adequate liquidity to cover any increase in net operating assets and liabilities and expected capital expenditures in the foreseeable future.

 

In addition, our wholly-owned subsidiary, Cofina Financial, makes seasonal and term loans to member cooperatives, businesses and individual producers of agricultural products included in our cash flows from investing activities, and has its own financing explained in further detail below under “Cash Flows from Financing Activities.”

 

Cash Flows from Operations

 

Cash flows from operations are generally affected by commodity prices and the seasonality of our businesses. These commodity prices are affected by a wide range of factors beyond our control, including weather, crop conditions, drought, the availability and the adequacy of supply and transportation, government regulations and policies, world events and general political and economic conditions. These factors are described in the cautionary statements and may affect net operating assets and liabilities and liquidity.

 

Cash flows provided by operating activities were $1,735.5 million, $805.8 million and $407.3 million for the years ended August 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007, respectively. The fluctuation in cash flows from operations between fiscal 2009 and 2008 was primarily from a net decrease in operating assets and liabilities during fiscal

2009, compared to a net increase in fiscal 2008, partially offset by decreased operating earnings in fiscal 2009. Commodity prices have declined significantly during the year ended August 31, 2009, which has resulted in lower working capital needs compared to August 31, 2008. The fluctuations in cash flows from operations between fiscal 2008 and 2007 was primarily the result of a smaller net increase in operating assets and liabilities during fiscal 2008 when compared to fiscal 2007.

 

Our operating activities provided net cash of $1,735.5 million during the year ended August 31, 2009. Net income of $381.4 million, net non-cash expenses and cash distributions from equity investments of $345.6 million and a decrease in net operating assets and liabilities of $1,008.5 million provided the net cash from operating activities. The primary components of net non-cash expenses and cash distributions from equity investments included depreciation and amortization, including amortization of major repair costs, of $221.3 million, minority interests of $59.8 million, loss on investments of $56.3 million and deferred taxes of $44.0 million, which were partially offset by income from equity investments, net of redemptions from those investments, of $25.4 million. Loss on investments was previously discussed in “Results of Operations,” and is primarily composed of the loss on our VeraSun investment, partially offset by gains from the sales of an agronomy investment and our NYMEX Holdings common stock. The decrease in net operating assets and liabilities was caused primarily by a decline in commodity prices reflected in decreased inventories and receivables, partially offset by a decrease in accounts payable, accrued expenses and customer advance payments on August 31, 2009 when compared to August 31, 2008. On August 31, 2009, the per bushel market prices of our three primary grain commodities, corn, spring wheat and soybeans, decreased by $2.42 (43%), $3.40 (39%) and $2.32 (17%), respectively, when compared to the spot prices on August 31, 2008. In general, crude oil market prices decreased $46 per barrel (39%) on August 31, 2009 when compared to August 31, 2008. In addition, on August 31, 2009 fertilizer commodity prices affecting our wholesale crop nutrients and country operations retail businesses reflected decreases between 45% and 71%, depending on the specific products, compared to prices on August 31, 2008. A decrease in grain inventory quantities in our Ag Business segment of 12.4 million bushels (12%) also contributed to the decrease in net operating assets and liabilities when comparing inventories at August 31, 2009 to August 31, 2008.

 

Our operating activities provided net cash of $805.8 million during the year ended August 31, 2008. Net income of $803.0 million and net non-cash expenses and cash distributions from equity investments of $230.0 million were partially offset by an increase in net operating assets and liabilities of $227.2 million. The primary components of net non-cash expenses and cash distributions from equity investments included depreciation and amortization, including amortization of major repair costs, of $210.4 million, minority interests of $72.2 million and deferred taxes of $26.0 million, which were partially offset by income from equity investments, net of distributions, of $40.4 million and a pretax net gain on investments of $29.2 million. Gains on investments were previously discussed in “Results of Operations”, and were primarily comprised of the gain on the sale of all of our shares of CF common stock, partially off set by an impairment of our VeraSun investment. The increase in net operating assets and liabilities was caused primarily by increased commodity prices reflected in increased inventories, receivables, derivative assets and hedging deposits included in other current assets, partially offset by an increase in accounts payable, accrued expenses, customer advance payments and derivative liabilities on August 31, 2008 when compared to August 31, 2007. On August 31, 2008, the per bushel market prices of our three primary grain commodities, corn, soybeans and spring wheat, increased by $2.44 (75%), $4.64 (53%) and $1.69 (24%), respectively, when compared to the spot prices on August 31, 2007. The affect of increased grain prices on our operating assets and liabilities was partially offset by a decrease in our Ag Business segment grain inventories of 44.7 million bushels (30%) when comparing inventories at August 31, 2008 to August 31, 2007. In general, crude oil market prices increased $41 per barrel (56%) on August 31, 2008 when compared to August 31, 2007. In addition, on August 31, 2008, fertilizer commodity prices affecting our country operations retail businesses reflected increases between 73% and 248%, depending on the specific products, compared to prices on August 31, 2007.

 

Our operating activities provided net cash of $407.3 million during the year ended August 31, 2007. Net income of $756.7 million and net non-cash expenses and cash distributions from equity investments of $288.4 million were partially offset by an increase in net operating assets and liabilities of $637.8 million. The

primary components of net non-cash expenses and cash distributions from equity investments included minority interests of $143.2 million, depreciation and amortization, including major repair costs, of $163.8 million and deferred taxes of $50.9 million, which were partially offset by income from equity investments, net of distributions, of $43.0 million and a pretax gain on investments of $20.6 million. The increase in net operating assets and liabilities was caused primarily by increased commodity prices reflected in increased inventories, receivables, derivative assets and hedging deposits included in other current assets, partially offset by an increase in accounts payable, accrued expenses, derivative liabilities and customer advances on August 31, 2007 when compared to August 31, 2006. On August 31, 2007, the per bushel market prices of our three primary grain commodities, soybeans, spring wheat and corn, increased by $3.26 (60%), $2.37 (52%) and $0.92 (40%), respectively, when compared to the spot prices on August 31, 2006. In addition, grain inventories in our Ag Business segment increased by 39.6 million bushels (36%) when comparing inventories at August 31, 2007 to August 31, 2006. In general, crude oil prices increased $4 per barrel (5%) on August 31, 2007 when compared to August 31, 2006.

 

Crude oil prices have increased significantly over the fiscal 2009 low price, likely driven to a large extent by the weakness in the U.S. dollar relative to other world currencies. Grain prices are influenced significantly by global projections of grain stocks available until the next harvest, which has been affected by demand from the ethanol industry in recent years. Grain prices were volatile during fiscal 2008 and 2007, and although they have declined significantly during fiscal 2009, we anticipate continued price volatility, but within a narrower band of real values.

 

Cash Flows from Investing Activities

 

For the years ended August 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007, the net cash flows used in our investing activities totaled $289.9 million, $663.7 million and $530.0 million, respectively.

 

Excluding investments in fiscal 2008, further discussed below, the acquisition of property, plant and equipment comprised the primary use of cash totaling $315.5 million, $318.6 million and $373.3 million for the years ended August 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007, respectively. Included in our total acquisitions of property, plant and equipment for fiscal 2009 were capital expenditures for an EPA mandated regulation that requires the reduction of the benzene level in gasoline to be less than 0.62% volume by January 1, 2011. We anticipate the combined capital expenditures to reduce the current gasoline benzene levels to the regulated levels for our Laurel, Montana and NCRA refineries to be approximately $134 million, of which $33 million was spent during the year ended August 31, 2009. Included in our total acquisitions of property, plant and equipment for fiscal 2008 and 2007 were capital expenditures for the installation of a coker unit at our Laurel, Montana refinery, along with other refinery improvements, in the amounts of $132.5 million and $221.5 million, respectively. The coker project was completed in fiscal 2008, and allows us to extract a greater volume of high value gasoline and diesel fuel from a barrel of crude oil and less relatively low value asphalt. For the year ending August 31, 2010, we expect total expenditures for the acquisition of property, plant and equipment to be approximately $490.8 million.

 

Expenditures for major repairs related to our refinery turnarounds were $1.8 million, $21.7 million and $34.7 million during the years ended August 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007, respectively.

 

In October 2003, we and NCRA reached agreements with the EPA and the State of Montana’s Department of Environmental Quality and the State of Kansas Department of Health and Environment regarding the terms of settlements with respect to reducing air emissions at our Laurel, Montana and NCRA’s McPherson, Kansas refineries. These settlements are part of a series of similar settlements that the EPA has negotiated with major refiners under the EPA’s Petroleum Refinery Initiative. The settlements take the form of consent decrees filed with the U.S. District Court for the District of Montana (Billings Division) and the U.S. District Court for the District of Kansas. Each consent decree details potential capital improvements, supplemental environmental projects and operational changes that we and NCRA have agreed to implement at the relevant refinery over several years. The consent decrees also required us, and NCRA, to pay approximately $0.5 million in aggregate civil cash penalties. As of August 31, 2009, the aggregate capital expenditures for us and NCRA related to these settlements was approximately $37 million, and we anticipate

spending an additional $3 million over the next few years. We do not believe that the settlements will have a material adverse effect on us, or NCRA.

 

Investments made during the years ended August 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007 totaled $120.2 million, $370.2 million and $95.8 million, respectively.

 

During the year ended August 31, 2007, we invested $22.2 million in Multigrain AG (Multigrain) for a 37.5% equity position in a Brazil-based grain handling and merchandising company, Multigrain S.A., headquartered in Sao Paulo, Brazil. The venture, included in our Ag Business segment, operates grain storage, export facilities and grain production and builds on our South American soybean origination. During the year ended August 31, 2008, we increased our equity position through a purchase from an existing equity holder for $10.0 million, and also invested an additional $30.3 million which was used by Multigrain to invest in a joint venture that acquired production farmland and related operations. During fiscal 2009, we invested $76.3 million for Multigrain’s increased capital needs resulting from expansion of their operations. Our current ownership interest is 39.35%.

 

We have opened additional international offices between July 2007 and August 2009, which are included in our Ag Business segment, including Geneva, Switzerland; Kiev, Ukraine and Vostok, Russia for sourcing and marketing grains and oilseeds through the Black Sea and Mediterranean Basin regions to customers worldwide. We have announced our commitment to invest approximately $30 million in a construction project in the port of Odessa, Ukraine, with the resulting port facility to have grain storage capacity of 120,000 metric tons and the ability to load Panamax vessels at a pace of 20,000 metric tons per day. Offices in Hong Kong and Shanghai, China serve Pacific Rim customers receiving grains and oilseeds from our origination points in North and South America. The most recent grain merchandising office opened during fiscal 2009 is located in Barcelona, Spain, and subsequent to our fiscal year ended August 31, 2009, we opened another office in Buenos Aires, Argentina.

 

We have a 50% interest in Ventura Foods, a joint venture which produces and distributes primarily vegetable oil-based products, and is included in our Processing segment. During the years ended August 31, 2009 and 2008, we made capital contributions to Ventura Foods of $35.0 million and $20.0 million, respectively.

 

As previously discussed, in September 2007, Agriliance distributed its wholesale crop nutrients and crop protection assets to us and Land O’Lakes, respectively, and continues to operate its retail distribution business while further repositioning of that business occurs during fiscal 2010. During the year ended August 31, 2008, we made a $13.0 million net cash payment to Land O’Lakes in order to maintain equal capital accounts in Agriliance, and Land O’Lakes paid us $8.3 million for additional assets distributed to them by Agriliance related to joint venture ownership interests. In addition, during the year ended August 31, 2008 our net contribution to Agriliance was $235.0 million, which supported their working capital requirements for ongoing operations, with Land O’Lakes making equal contributions to Agriliance.

 

During the year ended August 31, 2007, we invested $15.6 million in Horizon Milling G.P. (24% CHS ownership), a joint venture included in our Processing segment, that acquired the Canadian grain-based foodservice and industrial businesses of Smucker Foods of Canada, whose operations include flour milling and dry baking mixing facilities in Canada. During the year ended August 31, 2008, we invested an additional $1.9 million in Horizon Milling G.P.

 

We purchased $70.0 million of common stock in US BioEnergy, an ethanol production company, during the year ended August 31, 2006, which is reflected in our Processing segment. During the years ended August 31, 2008 and 2007, we made additional investments of $6.5 million and $45.4 million, respectively.

 

Cash acquisitions of businesses, net of cash received, totaled $76.4 million, $47.0 million and $15.1 million during the years ended August 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007, respectively. As previously discussed, Cofina Financial became a wholly-owned subsidiary in fiscal 2009 when we purchased the remaining 51% ownership interest for $53.3 million. The purchase price included cash of $40.2 million, representing a $48.5 million payment net of cash received of $8.3 million, and the assumption of certain liabilities of $4.8 million. Also during fiscal 2009, our Ag Business segment had acquisitions of $36.2 million. In fiscal

2008, we purchased a soy-based food ingredients business included in our Processing segment and an energy and convenience store business included in our Energy segment. In addition, we acquired and paid for a distillers dried grain business included in our Ag Business segment during fiscal 2008 and 2007.

 

Various other cash acquisitions of intangible assets totaled $2.4 million, $3.4 million and $9.1 million during the years ended August 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007, respectively.

 

Partially offsetting our cash outlays for investing activities for the year ended August 31, 2009 were changes in notes receivable that resulted in a net increase in cash flows of $123.3 million. This net increase primarily includes an increase in cash flows of $161.2 million from Cofina Financial notes receivable from its customers, partially offset by a decrease in cash flows of $17.1 million from additional related party notes receivable at NCRA from its minority owners. For the years ended August 31, 2008 and 2007, changes in notes receivable resulted in net decreases in cash flows of $67.1 million and $29.3 million, respectively. During fiscal 2008, $46.0 million of the net decrease in cash flows resulted from a note receivable from Cofina Financial prior to it becoming a wholly-owned subsidiary, and the balance was primarily from related party notes receivable at NCRA from its minority owners. For fiscal 2007, the changes in notes receivable were primarily from related party notes receivable at NCRA.

 

Also partially offsetting our cash outlays for investing activities during the years ended August 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007 were proceeds from the sale of investments of $41.8 million, $122.1 million and $10.9 million, respectively, which were previously discussed in “Results of Operations.” These proceeds were primarily from the sale of an agronomy investment and our NYMEX Holdings common stock during fiscal 2009 and the sale of our CF common stock in fiscal 2008 and 2007. In addition, for the years ended August 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007 we received redemptions of investments totaling $39.8 million, $43.0 million and $4.9 million, respectively, and received proceeds from the disposition of property, plant and equipment of $10.8 million, $9.3 million and $13.5 million, respectively.

 

Cash Flows from Financing Activities

 

Working Capital Financing.  We finance our working capital needs through short-term lines of credit with a syndication of domestic and international banks. In May 2006, we renewed and expanded our committed lines of revolving credit to include a five-year revolving facility in the amount of $1.1 billion, with the ability to expand the facility an additional $200.0 million. In October 2007, we expanded that facility, receiving additional commitments in the amount of $200.0 million from certain lenders under the agreement. The additional commitments increased the total borrowing capacity to $1.3 billion on the facility. In February 2009, we renewed our 364-day revolver with a syndication of banks for a committed amount of $300.0 million. In addition to these lines of credit, we have a committed revolving credit facility dedicated to NCRA, with a syndication of banks in the amount of $15.0 million. In December 2008, the line of credit dedicated to NCRA was renewed for an additional year. Our wholly-owned subsidiary, CHS Europe S.A., has uncommitted lines of credit to finance its normal trade grain transactions, which are collateralized by $15.7 million of its inventories and receivables as of August 31, 2009. On August 31, 2009 and 2008, we had total short-term indebtedness outstanding on these various facilities and other miscellaneous short-term notes payable totaling $19.2 million and $106.2 million, respectively, with interest rates ranging from 0.96% to 8.50% on August 31, 2009. Proceeds from our long-term borrowings totaling $600.0 million during the year ended August 31, 2008, were used to pay down our five-year revolving facility and are explained in further detail below.

 

During the year ended August 31, 2007, we instituted two commercial paper programs, totaling up to $125.0 million, with two banks participating in our five-year revolving credit facility. Terms of our five-year revolving credit facility allow a maximum usage of commercial paper of $200.0 million at any point in time. The commercial paper programs do not increase our committed borrowing capacity in that we are required to have at least an equal amount of undrawn capacity available on our five-year revolving facility as to the amount of commercial paper issued. As of August 31, 2009 and 2008, we had no commercial paper outstanding.

 

Cofina Financial Financing.  Cofina Funding, LLC (Cofina Funding), a wholly-owned subsidiary of Cofina Financial, has available credit totaling $212.0 million as of August 31, 2009 under note purchase

agreements with various purchasers through the issuance of short-term notes payable. As of November 20, 2009, Cofina Financial has an additional $25.00 million available credit under note purchase agreements. Cofina Financial sells eligible commercial loans receivable it has originated to Cofina Funding, which are then pledged as collateral under the note purchase agreements. The notes payable issued by Cofina Funding bear interest at variable rates based on commercial paper and/or Eurodollar rates, with a weighted average Eurodollar interest rate of 1.77% as of August 31, 2009. Borrowings by Cofina Funding utilizing the issuance of commercial paper under the note purchase agreements totaled $101.7 million as of August 31, 2009. As of August 31, 2009, $64.7 million of related loans receivable were accounted for as sales when they were surrendered in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 140, “Accounting for Transfers and Servicing of Financial Assets and Extinguishments of Liabilities.” As a result, the net borrowings under the note purchase agreements were $37.0 million.

 

Cofina Financial also sells loan commitments it has originated to ProPartners Financial (ProPartners) on a recourse basis. The total capacity for commitments under the ProPartners program is $120.0 million. The total outstanding commitments under the program totaled $95.2 million as of August 31, 2009, of which $74.2 million was borrowed under these commitments with an interest rate of 2.04%.

 

Cofina Financial borrows funds under short-term notes issued as part of a surplus funds program. Borrowings under this program are unsecured and bear interest at variable rates ranging from 1.00% to 1.50% as of August 31, 2009, and are due upon demand. Borrowings under these notes totaled $116.5 million as of August 31, 2009.

 

Long-term Debt Financing.  We typically finance our long-term capital needs, primarily for the acquisition of property, plant and equipment, with long-term agreements with various insurance companies and banks. In June 1998, we established a long-term credit agreement through cooperative banks, for which we paid the note in full during the year ended August 31, 2009. The amount outstanding on August 31, 2008, was $49.2 million. Repayments of $49.2 million, $26.2 million and $23.0 million were made on this facility during the three years ended August 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007, respectively.

 

Also in June 1998, we completed a private placement offering with several insurance companies for long-term debt in the amount of $225.0 million with an interest rate of 6.81%. Repayments are due in equal annual installments during the years 2008 through 2013. During each of the years ended August 31, 2009 and 2008, repayments totaled $37.5 million.

 

In January 2001, we entered into a note purchase and private shelf agreement with Prudential Insurance Company. The long-term note in the amount of $25.0 million has an interest rate of 7.9% and is due in equal annual installments of approximately $3.6 million in the years 2005 through 2011. A subsequent note for $55.0 million was issued in March 2001, related to the private shelf facility. The $55.0 million note has an interest rate of 7.43% and is due in equal annual installments of approximately $7.9 million in the years 2005 through 2011. During each of the years ended August 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007, repayments on these notes totaled $11.4 million.

 

In October 2002, we completed a private placement with several insurance companies for long-term debt in the amount of $175.0 million, which was layered into two series. The first series of $115.0 million has an interest rate of 4.96% and is due in equal semi-annual installments of approximately $8.8 million during the years 2007 through 2013. The second series of $60.0 million has an interest rate of 5.60% and is due in equal semi-annual installments of approximately $4.6 million during years 2012 through 2018. Repayments of $17.7 million were made on the first series notes during each of the years ended August 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007.

 

In March 2004, we entered into a note purchase and private shelf agreement with Prudential Capital Group. In April 2004, we borrowed $30.0 million under this arrangement. One long-term note in the amount of $15.0 million has an interest rate of 4.08% and is due in full at the end of the six-year term in 2010. Another long-term note in the amount of $15.0 million has an interest rate of 4.39% and is due in full at the end of the seven-year term in 2011. In April 2007, we amended our Note Purchase and Private Shelf Agreement with Prudential Investment Management, Inc. and several other participating insurance companies

to expand the uncommitted facility from $70.0 million to $150.0 million. We borrowed $50.0 million under the shelf arrangement in February 2008, for which the aggregate long-term notes have an interest rate of 5.78% and are due in equal annual installments of $10.0 million during the years 2014 through 2018.

 

In September 2004, we entered into a private placement with several insurance companies for long-term debt in the amount of $125.0 million with an interest rate of 5.25%. The debt is due in equal annual installments of $25.0 million during years 2011 through 2015.

 

In October 2007, we entered into a private placement with several insurance companies and banks for long-term debt in the amount of $400.0 million with an interest rate of 6.18%. Repayments are due in equal annual installments of $80.0 million during the years 2013 through 2017.

 

In December 2007, we established a ten-year long-term credit agreement through a syndication of cooperative banks in the amount of $150.0 million with an interest rate of 5.59%. Repayments are due in equal semi-annual installments of $15.0 million each, starting in June 2013 through December 2018.

 

Through NCRA, we had revolving term loans that were paid in full during the year ended August 31, 2009. The amount outstanding on August 31, 2008 was $0.5 million. Repayments of $0.5 million, $2.5 million and $3.0 million were made during the years ended August 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007, respectively.

 

On August 31, 2009, we had total long-term debt outstanding of $1,072.0 million, of which $899.8 million was private placement debt, $150.0 million was bank financing and $22.2 million was industrial revenue bonds and other notes and contracts payable. On August 31, 2008, we had long-term debt outstanding of $1,194.9 million. Our long-term debt is unsecured except for other notes and contracts in the amount of $10.3 million; however, restrictive covenants under various agreements have requirements for maintenance of minimum working capital levels and other financial ratios. We were in compliance with all debt covenants and restrictions as of August 31, 2009. The aggregate amount of long-term debt payable as of August 31, 2009 was as follows (dollars in thousands):

 

 

We did not have any new long-term borrowings during the year ended August 31, 2009. During the years ended August 31, 2008 and 2007, we borrowed $600.0 million and $4.1 million, respectively, on a long-term basis. During the years ended August 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007, we repaid long-term debt of $118.9 million, $99.5 million and $60.9 million, respectively.

 

Other Financing.  Distributions to minority owners for the years ended August 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007 were $21.1 million, $63.1 million and $76.8 million, respectively, and were primarily related to NCRA.

 

During the year ended August 31, 2009, changes in checks and drafts outstanding resulted in a decrease in cash flows of $119.3 million, and during the years ended August 31, 2008 and 2007, resulted in an increase in cash flows of $61.1 million and $85.4 million, respectively.

 

In accordance with the bylaws and by action of the Board of Directors, annual net earnings from patronage sources are distributed to consenting patrons following the close of each fiscal year. Patronage refunds are calculated based on amounts using financial statement earnings. The cash portion of the patronage distribution is determined annually by the Board of Directors with the balance issued in the form of capital equity certificates. Consenting patrons have agreed to take both the cash and capital equity certificate portion allocated to them from our previous fiscal year’s income into their taxable income, and as a result, we are allowed a deduction from our taxable income for both the cash distribution and the allocated capital equity

certificates, as long as the cash distribution is at least 20% of the total patronage dividend. The patronage earnings for the year ended August 31, 2008 were primarily distributed during the second fiscal quarter of the year ended August 31, 2009 and totaled $648.9 million. The cash portion of this distribution, deemed by the Board of Directors to be 35%, was $227.6 million. During the years ended August 31, 2008 and 2007, we had patronage refunds of $557.2 million and $379.9 million, respectively, of which the cash portion was $195.0 million and $133.1 million, respectively.

 

Total patronage for the year ended August 31, 2009, is expected to be approximately $426.5 million. The cash portion of this distribution, determined by the Board of Directors to be 35% and to be distributed in fiscal 2010, is expected to be approximately $149.3 million and is classified as a current liability on the August 31, 2009 Consolidated Balance Sheet in dividends and equities payable. By action of the Board of Directors, patronage losses incurred in fiscal 2009 from our wholesale crop nutrients business, totaling approximately $60.0 million, will be offset against capital equity certificates issued as the result of fiscal 2008 wholesale crop nutrients operating earnings and the gain on the sale of our CF Industries stock.

 

Redemptions of capital equity certificates approved by the Board of Directors are divided into two pools, one for non-individuals (primarily member cooperatives) who may participate in an annual pro-rata program for equities held by them and another for individuals who are eligible for equity redemptions at age 70 or upon death. The amount that each non-individual receives under the pro-rata program in any year is determined by multiplying the dollars available for pro-rata redemptions, if any that year, as determined by the Board of Directors, by a fraction, the numerator of which is the amount of patronage certificates eligible for redemption held by them, and the denominator of which is the sum of the patronage certificates eligible for redemption held by all eligible holders of patronage certificates that are not individuals. In addition to the annual pro-rata program, the Board of Directors approved additional equity redemptions to non-individuals in prior years targeting older capital equity certificates which were redeemed in cash in fiscal 2008 and 2007. In accordance with authorization from the Board of Directors, we expect total redemptions related to the year ended August 31, 2009, that will be distributed in fiscal 2010, to be approximately $50.1 million. These expected distributions are classified as a current liability on the August 31, 2009 Consolidated Balance Sheet.

 

For the years ended August 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007, we redeemed in cash, equities in accordance with authorization from the Board of Directors, in the amounts of $49.7 million, $81.8 million and $70.8 million, respectively. An additional $49.9 million, $46.4 million and $35.9 million of capital equity certificates were redeemed in fiscal 2009, 2008 and 2007, respectively, by issuance of shares of our 8% Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock (Preferred Stock). The amount of equities redeemed with each share of Preferred Stock issued was $25.90, $25.65 and $26.09, which was the closing price per share of the stock on the NASDAQ Global Select Market on January 23, 2009, February 11, 2008 and February 8, 2007, respectively.

 

Our Preferred Stock is listed on the NASDAQ Global Select Market under the symbol CHSCP. On August 31, 2009, we had 10,976,107 shares of Preferred Stock outstanding with a total redemption value of approximately $274.4 million, excluding accumulated dividends. Our Preferred Stock accumulates dividends at a rate of 8% per year, which are payable quarterly, and is redeemable at our option. At this time, we have no current plan or intent to redeem any Preferred Stock. Dividends paid on our preferred stock during the years ended August 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007 were $20.0 million, $16.3 million and $13.1 million, respectively.

 

Off Balance Sheet Financing Arrangements

 

Lease Commitments:

 

We have commitments under operating leases for various refinery, manufacturing and transportation equipment, rail cars, vehicles and office space. Some leases include purchase options at not less than fair market value at the end of the lease term.

 

Total rental expense for all operating leases, net of rail car mileage credits received from the railroad and sublease income for the years ended August 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007, was $61.1 million, $58.3 million and $44.3 million, respectively.

Minimum future lease payments required under noncancellable operating leases as of August 31, 2009 were as follows:

 

 

Guarantees:

 

We are a guarantor for lines of credit for related companies. Our bank covenants allow maximum guarantees of $500.0 million, of which $17.3 million was outstanding on August 31, 2009. The underlying loans to the counterparties, for which we provide guarantees, are current as of August 31, 2009.

 

Debt:

 

There is no material off balance sheet debt.

 

Contractual Obligations

 

We had certain contractual obligations at August 31, 2009 which require the following payments to be made: