Use these links to rapidly review the document
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1000
Nicollet Mall
Minneapolis, Minnesota 55403
(612) 304-6073
PROXY STATEMENT
Annual Meeting of Shareholders
May 22, 2002
The accompanying Proxy Statement describes important issues affecting Target Corporation. If you are a shareholder of record, you have the right to vote your shares through the Internet, by telephone or by mail. You may also revoke your proxy any time before the Annual Meeting. Please help us save time and postage costs by voting through the Internet or by telephone. Each method is generally available 24 hours a day and will ensure that your vote is confirmed and posted immediately. To vote:
(Do not mail the proxy card if you are voting by Internet or telephone.)
If your shares are held in the name of a bank, broker or other holder of record, you will receive instructions from the holder of record that you must follow in order for your shares to be voted.
Your vote is important. Thank you for voting.
1000
Nicollet Mall
Minneapolis, Minnesota 55403
(612) 304-6073
NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS
|
|
|
---|---|---|
TIME | 9:30 a.m., Central Daylight Time, on Wednesday, May 22, 2002 | |
PLACE | The Children's Theatre 2400 Third Avenue South Minneapolis, Minnesota |
|
ITEMS OF BUSINESS | (1) To elect three directors for three-year terms. | |
(2) To approve the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as independent auditors. | ||
(3) To approve the Corporation's amended Executive Short-Term Incentive Plan. | ||
(4) To act upon any other business that may properly come before the meeting. | ||
RECORD DATE | You may vote if you are a shareholder of record at the close of business on March 29, 2002. | |
ANNUAL REPORT | Our 2001 Annual Report, which is not part of the proxy soliciting material, is enclosed. | |
PROXY VOTING | It is important that your shares be represented and voted at the Annual Meeting. Please vote in one of these three ways: | |
(1) VISIT THE WEB SITE shown on your proxy card to vote through the Internet, | ||
(2) USE THE TOLL-FREE TELEPHONE NUMBER shown on the proxy card, OR | ||
(3) MARK, SIGN, DATE AND PROMPTLY RETURN the enclosed proxy card in the postage-paid envelope. | ||
Any proxy may be revoked at any time prior to its exercise at the Annual Meeting. |
James T. Hale Corporate Secretary |
Approximate
Date of Mailing of Proxy
Material: April 15, 2002
1000 Nicollet Mall
Minneapolis, Minnesota 55403
PROXY STATEMENT
ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS
May 22, 2002
The Board of Directors of Target Corporation solicits the enclosed proxy for the Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be held at The Children's Theatre, 2400 Third Avenue South, Minneapolis, Minnesota, on Wednesday, May 22, 2002, at 9:30 a.m., Central Daylight Time, and for any adjournment thereof.
GENERAL INFORMATION ABOUT THE MEETING AND VOTING
What is the purpose of the Annual Meeting?
At our Annual Meeting, shareholders will act upon the matters described in the accompanying notice of meeting, including the election of three directors, appointment of the Corporation's independent auditors and approval of the Corporation's amended Executive Short-Term Incentive Plan. In addition, our management will report on the performance of the Corporation during fiscal 2001 and respond to questions from shareholders.
We have one class of voting shares outstanding. Only shareholders of record of our Common Stock at the close of business on the record date, March 29, 2002, are entitled to receive notice of the Annual Meeting and to vote the shares of Common Stock that they held on the record date, at the meeting, or any postponement or adjournment of the meeting. As of the record date for the Annual Meeting, each share of Common Stock had one vote on each matter to be voted upon.
Who may attend the Annual Meeting?
All shareholders as of the record date, or their duly appointed proxies, may attend the meeting. Seating, however, is limited. Admission to the meeting is on a first-come, first-served basis and seating begins at approximately 9:00 a.m. The admission ticket attached to the enclosed proxy card is required for admission to the meeting. Cameras and recording devices are not permitted at the meeting.
Please note that if you hold shares in "street name" (that is, through a bank, broker or other nominee), you will need to bring personal identification and a copy of a statement reflecting your share ownership as of the record date and check in at the registration desk at the meeting.
The presence at the meeting, in person or by proxy, of the holders of a majority of Common Stock outstanding on the record date will constitute a quorum, permitting the meeting to conduct its business. As of the record date, 906,759,892 shares of our Common Stock were outstanding. Proxies received but marked as abstentions and broker non-votes will be included in the calculation of the number of shares considered to be present at the meeting for purposes of determining whether there is a quorum.
May I vote by proxy card, by telephone or through the Internet?
You may vote by completing and properly signing the enclosed proxy card and returning it to the Corporation in the envelope provided. If you are a registered shareholder (those whose shares are owned in their name and not in "street name") and attend the meeting, you may deliver your completed proxy card in person. In addition, registered shareholders may vote either by telephone or through the Internet by following the instructions on the inside of the front cover of these materials and on the reverse side of the enclosed admission ticket. "Street name" shareholders who wish to vote at the meeting will need to obtain a proxy form from the institution that holds their shares.
Yes. Our policy is to treat all shareholder meeting proxies, ballots and voting tabulations of a shareholder confidentially, if the shareholder has requested confidentiality on the proxy or ballot.
If you so request, your proxy will not be available for examination nor will your vote be disclosed prior to the tabulation of the final vote at the Annual Meeting except (i) to meet applicable legal requirements, (ii) to allow the independent election inspectors to count and certify the results of the vote or (iii) where there is a proxy solicitation in opposition to the Board of Directors, based upon an opposition proxy statement filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission. The independent election inspectors may at any time inform us whether or not a shareholder has voted.
Yes. Even after you have submitted your proxy, you may change your vote at any time before the proxy is exercised by filing with the Corporate Secretary of the Corporation either a notice of revocation or a duly executed proxy bearing a later date. Alternatively, if you have voted by telephone or through the Internet, you may change your vote by calling the toll free number again and following the instructions, or by accessing the web site and following the instructions. The powers of the proxy holders will be suspended if you attend the meeting in person and so request, although attendance at the meeting will not by itself revoke a previously granted proxy.
How does the Board recommend I vote?
Unless you give instructions on your proxy card, the persons named as proxy holders on the proxy card will vote in accordance with the recommendations of the Board of Directors. The Board's recommendation is set forth together with the description of each item in this Proxy Statement. In summary, the Board of Directors recommends a vote:
FOR election of the director nominees (see pages 5-22);
FOR approval of the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as the Corporation's independent auditors (see page 23); and
FOR approval of the Corporation's amended Executive Short-Term Incentive Plan (see pages 23-25).
With respect to any other matter that properly comes before the meeting, the proxy holders will vote as recommended by the Board of Directors or, if no recommendation is given, in their own discretion.
How many votes are required to approve each item?
Election of Directors. The affirmative vote of a majority of the outstanding shares of Common Stock of the Corporation entitled to vote on the election of directors and present in person or by proxy at the Annual Meeting is required for the election to the Board of Directors of each of the three director nominees. For this purpose, a properly executed proxy marked "WITHHOLD" with respect
to the election of director nominees will be counted for purposes of determining whether there is a quorum, but will not be considered present in person or by proxy and entitled to vote on the election of directors.
Other Items. For appointment of our independent auditors, approval of the amended Executive Short-Term Incentive Plan, and any other items that properly come before the meeting, the affirmative vote of a majority of the outstanding shares of Common Stock of the Corporation entitled to vote on the item and present in person or by proxy at the Annual Meeting will be required for approval. A properly executed proxy marked "ABSTAIN" with respect to any such matter will be counted for purposes of determining whether there is a quorum and will be considered present in person or by proxy and entitled to vote. Accordingly, an abstention will have the effect of a negative vote.
What if other matters are presented for determination at the Annual Meeting?
As of the date of this Proxy Statement, management knows of no matters that will be presented for determination at the meeting other than those referred to herein. If any other matters properly come before the meeting calling for a vote of shareholders, proxies in the enclosed form returned to us will be voted in accordance with the recommendation of the Board of Directors, or, in the absence of such a recommendation, in accordance with the judgment of the proxy holders.
Who pays the expenses incurred in connection with the solicitation of proxies?
Expenses in connection with the solicitation of proxies will be paid by us. Proxies are being solicited principally by mail, by telephone and through the Internet. We have retained Georgeson Shareholder Communications Inc. to act as a proxy solicitor for a fee estimated to be $20,000, plus reimbursement of out-of-pocket expenses. In addition, our directors, officers and regular employees may solicit proxies personally, by e-mail, telephone, fax or special letter. We may reimburse brokerage firms and others for their expenses in forwarding proxy materials to the beneficial owners of shares of the Corporation.
How may I get additional copies of the Annual Report?
Our Annual Report for the fiscal year ended February 2, 2002, including financial statements, is enclosed. The Annual Report is also available online at www.target.com (click on "Company," "Target Corporation," and "Investor Information"). For additional printed copies, please contact our Investor Relations representative by e-mail at investorrelations@target.com, by mail to our Vice President, Investor Relations, at the address listed on the cover of this Proxy Statement, or by telephone at (612) 761-6736.
How may I receive materials through the Internet?
As described more specifically in the immediately preceding question, you can obtain copies of our proxy materials, Annual Report and other information under the "Investor Information" section of our web site, www.target.com. You can also register at this same location to receive e-mail alerts when we post new information on our web site.
How may I elect to receive shareholder materials electronically and to discontinue my receipt of paper copies?
To obtain information about how to receive our proxy materials, Annual Report and other shareholder information electronically rather than in paper format, contact us via e-mail at investorrelations@target.com.
Comparison of Five-Year Cumulative Total Shareholder Return
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1997 |
1998 |
1999 |
2000 |
2001 |
2002 |
||||||
Target Corporation | 100 | 193.62 | 346.18 | 346.33 | 407.09 | 480.18 | ||||||
S&P 500 Index | 100 | 126.91 | 168.14 | 182.59 | 182.27 | 153.63 | ||||||
S&P 500 Retailing Peer Index | 100 | 152.56 | 256.80 | 267.52 | 285.52 | 296.78 |
The graph above compares the cumulative total shareholder return on our Common Stock for the last five fiscal years with cumulative total return on the S&P 500 Index and a peer group consisting of the companies comprising the S&P 500 Retailing Index and the S&P 500 Food and Drug Retailing Index (the "S&P 500 Retailing Peer Index") over the same period. The graph assumes the investment of $100 in the Corporation's Common Stock, the S&P 500 Index and the S&P 500 Retailing Peer Index on January 31, 1997, and reinvestment of all dividends. In prior years we have used the S&P Retail Composite Index for comparison. Because that index is no longer available, we have substituted the S&P 500 Retailing Peer Index in its place.
ITEM ONEELECTION OF DIRECTORS
Proxies solicited by the Board of Directors will, unless otherwise directed, be voted for the election of three nominees to serve as Class II directors for three-year terms expiring in 2005 and until their successors are elected. The three nominees are Roger A. Enrico, William W. George, and James A. Johnson. All of the nominees are currently directors.
The Board of Directors has no reason to believe that any of the nominees is not available or will not serve if elected. If for any reason any nominee becomes unavailable for election, the Board of Directors may designate substitute nominees, in which event the shares represented by proxies returned to us will be voted for such substitute nominees, unless an instruction to the contrary is indicated on the proxy.
General Information About the Board of Directors
The Corporation's Restated Articles of Incorporation, as amended, provide that our business and affairs shall be managed by, or under the direction of, a Board of Directors consisting of not fewer than five nor more than 21 persons. Directors are divided into three classes. Directors of one class are elected each year for a term of three years. The Board of Directors currently consists of Class I directors whose terms expire at the 2004 Annual Meeting, Class II directors whose terms expire at this Annual Meeting and Class III directors whose terms expire at the 2003 Annual Meeting.
Following is information regarding the nominees and continuing directors, including information furnished by them as to their principal occupations. All of the present directors except Warren R. Staley, who was appointed by the Board of Directors on September 12, 2001 to fill a vacancy, were elected to the Board of Directors by our shareholders. See page 10 for a table showing the number of shares of Common Stock of the Corporation beneficially owned by each director as of April 1, 2002.
Director |
Principal Occupation and Other Information |
Age |
Director Since |
|||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Roger A. Enrico Class II Nominee for term expiring in 2005 |
Roger A. Enrico retired from his position as Vice Chairman of the Board of PepsiCo, Inc., a domestic and international beverage and food business, in March 2002. He joined PepsiCo in 1971. He was elected Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of PepsiCo Worldwide Restaurants in 1994, elected Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of PepsiCo in 1996, and became Vice Chairman in May 2001. He is a director of Advanced Medicine, Inc., Belo Corp., Electronic Data Systems Corp., PepsiCo, Inc. and The National Geographic Society. |
57 |
1990 |
William W. George Class II Nominee for term expiring in 2005 |
William W. George is Chairman of the Board of Medtronic, Inc., a therapeutic medical technology company. He joined Medtronic in 1989 as President and Chief Operating Officer. He was elected Chief Executive Officer in 1991 and Chairman of the Board in 1996. He retired from his position as Chief Executive Officer in April 2001. He is a director of Medtronic, Inc. and Novartis AG. |
59 |
1993 |
|||
Michele J. Hooper Class I Term expires in 2004 |
Michele J. Hooper most recently served as President and Chief Executive Officer of Voyager Expanded Learning, an educational development company, from August 1999 to June 2000. She was Corporate Vice President, International Businesses, Caremark International, Inc., a health care company, from 1993 to July 1998. In July 1998, she became President and Chief Executive Officer of Stadtlander Drug Company, Inc., a pharmaceutical drug company, and served in that position until January 1999 when that company was acquired. She is a director of PPG Industries, Inc. |
50 |
1990 |
|||
James A. Johnson Class II Nominee for term expiring in 2005 |
James A. Johnson is Vice Chairman of Perseus, LLC, a merchant banking private equity firm. From 1991 to 1998, he served as Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Fannie Mae, a Congressionally-chartered financial services company, and from 1998 to 1999, he was the Chairman of the Executive Committee of the Board of Fannie Mae. From December 1999 to April 2001, he served as Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Johnson Capital Partners. In April 2001, he was elected to his current position. He is a director of Cummins Engine Company, Inc., Gannett Co., Inc., The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc., Kaufman & Broad Home Corp., Temple-Inland Inc. and UnitedHealth Group. |
58 |
1996 |
|||
Richard M. Kovacevich Class III Term expires in 2003 |
Richard M. Kovacevich is Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Wells Fargo & Co., a banking and financial services company. In 1993, he was elected President and Chief Executive Officer of Norwest Corp., a banking and financial services company. In 1995, he was elected Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of Norwest and held that position until Norwest merged with Wells Fargo in 1998, when he was elected President and Chief Executive Officer. In April 2001 he was elected to his current positions. He is a director of Cargill, Inc. and Wells Fargo & Co. |
58 |
1996 |
|||
Anne M. Mulcahy Class I Term expires in 2004 |
Anne M. Mulcahy is Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of Xerox Corp., a document management company. She joined Xerox in 1976 and has held various management positions in marketing, human resources and operations. From 1995 to 1997, she served as Staff Officer for Customer Operations, and from 1997 to 1998, she was Vice President and Chief Staff Officer. She served as Executive Vice President; President, General Markets Operations from 1998 until May 2000, and President and Chief Operating Officer from May 2000 through July 2001. In August 2001 she was elected Chief Executive Officer and in January 2002 she was elected Chairman of the Board. She is a director of Fannie Mae and Xerox Corp. |
49 |
1997 |
|||
Stephen W. Sanger Class I Term expires in 2004 |
Stephen W. Sanger is Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of General Mills, Inc., a consumer food products company. He joined General Mills in 1974 and held a series of positions in marketing and management across the company's consumer food businesses. In 1995, he was elected to his current positions. He is a director of Donaldson Company, Inc. and General Mills, Inc. |
56 |
1996 |
|||
Warren R. Staley Class I Term expires in 2004 |
Warren R. Staley is Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of Cargill, Inc., an international marketer, processor and distributor of agricultural, food, financial and industrial products and services. He joined Cargill in 1969 and has held various merchandising, administrative and management positions. He served as President and Chief Operating Officer from February 1998 until June 1999 and as President and Chief Executive Officer from June 1999 until August 2000, when he was elected to his current positions. He is a director of Cargill, Inc. and U.S. Bancorp. |
59 |
2001 |
|||
George W. Tamke Class III Term expires in 2003 |
George W. Tamke is a Principal with Clayton, Dubilier & Rice, Inc., a private investment firm. He served as Executive Vice President of Emerson Electric Company, a manufacturer of electrical and electronic equipment, from 1994 to 1997, as President in 1997, as President and Chief Operating Officer from 1997 to 1999 and as Vice Chairman and Co-Chief Executive Officer from 1999 to February 2000. He is a director of ICO Global Communications (Holdings) Ltd. and Kinko's, Inc. |
54 |
1999 |
|||
Solomon D. Trujillo Class III Term expires in 2003 |
Solomon D. Trujillo is Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of Graviton, Inc., a wireless communication technology company. From 1995 until June 1998, he was President and Chief Executive Officer of US WEST Communications Group, Inc., a business of US WEST, Inc., a telephone communications company which was merged with and into Qwest Corporation in June 2000. From June 1998 until November 2000, he served as Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of US West. In November 2000, he was elected to his current positions. He is a director of Comstellar Technologies, Inc., Orange SA, Graviton, Inc. and PepsiCo, Inc. |
50 |
1994 |
|||
Robert J. Ulrich Class III Term expires in 2003 |
Robert J. Ulrich is Chairman of the Board, Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Executive Committee of the Corporation and Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Target Stores, a division of the Corporation. He began his retailing career as a merchandising trainee in the Corporation's department store division in 1967 and advanced through various management positions. He became Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Target Stores in 1987 and was elected Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Corporation in 1994. He is a director of Tricon Global Restaurants, Inc. |
58 |
1993 |
Directors who are not employees of the Corporation (independent directors) are paid an annual fee of $40,000. Directors may defer receipt of their fees. If they do, their fees are credited at rates based upon the return earned by various investment alternatives chosen by the director. Directors may also direct us to forward their fees to the Corporation's transfer agent to purchase Common Stock of the Corporation for their account at market prices. We pay the brokerage fees for such purchases. Independent directors also receive $15,000 of restricted stock of the Corporation per year. Those shares are restricted until the director leaves the Board and certain conditions are satisfied. The Vice Chairman of the Executive Committee receives an additional $10,000 of our restricted stock each year. New independent directors also receive $50,000 of restricted stock upon joining the Board. Independent directors receive an annual grant of options to purchase the number of shares of our Common Stock determined by dividing $400,000 by the fair market value of the Common Stock on the day of grant. Independent directors also receive merchandise discounts of varying amounts at the stores of each of our operating companies. Those discounts are the same as the discounts our employees receive. Retired independent directors receive merchandise discounts that are the same as the discounts our retired employees receive. Employee directors are not compensated separately for services as a director or committee member.
The Corporation and its operating companies have transactions in the ordinary course of business with unaffiliated corporations of which certain of the independent directors are officers. We do not consider the amounts involved in such transactions to be material in relation to our business and believe that any such amounts are not material in relation to the business of such other unaffiliated corporations or the interests of the independent directors involved.
Board Meetings During Fiscal 2001
The Board of Directors met five times during fiscal 2001. All directors attended at least 75% of the aggregate total of meetings of the Board and Board Committees on which the director served during the last fiscal year.
The Executive Committee of the Board of Directors consists of the Chairman of the Board of the Corporation and all the independent directors. The members of the Executive Committee are Directors Ulrich (Chair), Enrico (Vice Chair), George, Hooper, Johnson, Kovacevich, Mulcahy, Sanger, Staley, Tamke and Trujillo. During the last fiscal year, the Executive Committee held one meeting. The Executive Committee reviews the Compensation Committee's recommendations on performance and compensation of all senior corporate officers and certain other senior executives within the Corporation. As part of their responsibilities, the independent director members of the Executive Committee conduct the annual evaluation of our Chief Executive Officer. The Executive Committee also reviews the Corporation's managerial capabilities and requirements.
The Nominating Committee of the Board of Directors consists solely of independent directors. The members of the Nominating Committee are Directors Sanger (Chair), Hooper, Kovacevich and Tamke. The Nominating Committee held one meeting during the last fiscal year. The Nominating Committee considers the qualifications of and recommends each candidate and incumbent for election as a director of the Corporation and nominates candidates to fill Board vacancies. The Board of Directors created the Nominating Committee so that the selection of directors would be made solely by independent directors.
The Nominating Committee will consider nomination by a shareholder of a candidate for election as a director of the Corporation. Any shareholder who wishes the Nominating Committee to consider a candidate should submit a written request and related information to the Corporate Secretary of the Corporation on behalf of the Nominating Committee no later than December 31 of the calendar year preceding the next Annual Meeting of Shareholders (currently held in May). Under the Corporation's Restated Articles of Incorporation, as amended, if a shareholder plans to nominate a person as a director at a meeting, the shareholder is required to place a proposed director's name in nomination by written request received by the Corporate Secretary of the Corporation at least 60 days prior to an annual or special meeting, together with the written consent of such person to serve as a director.
The Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors consists solely of independent directors. The members of the Compensation Committee are Directors Enrico (Chair), Johnson, Sanger, Tamke and Trujillo. The Compensation Committee held two meetings during the last fiscal year. The Compensation Committee reviews management proposals regarding compensation programs, plans and guidelines, focusing on a "pay-for-performance" compensation philosophy. The Compensation Committee reviews the performance of all senior corporate officers and certain other senior executives within the Corporation and recommends their compensation based on their performance. The Compensation Committee also determines certain awards and payouts under our long-term incentive plan and makes certain determinations regarding short-term incentive compensation.
The Audit Committee of the Board of Directors consists solely of independent directors. The members of the Audit Committee are Directors Hooper (Chair), Enrico, George and Kovacevich. The Audit Committee of the Board of Directors held two meetings during the last fiscal year. The Audit Committee Chair also participated in four conferences with management. The Board of Directors, in its business judgment, has determined that all members of the Committee are "independent," as required by applicable listing standards of the New York Stock Exchange. The duties and activities of the Audit Committee are described in the Report of the Audit Committee on page 22.
The Finance Committee of the Board of Directors consists solely of independent directors. The members of the Finance Committee are Directors Johnson (Chair), Mulcahy, Sanger, Staley and Trujillo. The Finance Committee met two times during the last fiscal year. The Finance Committee reviews our financial policies, our dividend policy, our performance objectives, our financing requirements, our compliance with indenture covenants and the investment policies of our employee benefit plans.
Corporate Responsibility Committee
The Corporate Responsibility Committee of the Board of Directors consists solely of independent directors. The members of the Corporate Responsibility Committee are Directors George (Chair), Johnson, Mulcahy, Staley and Trujillo. The Corporate Responsibility Committee held one meeting during the last fiscal year. The Corporate Responsibility Committee reviews and evaluates our public affairs and community development programs. The Corporate Responsibility Committee also reviews and evaluates our community giving programs and those of the Target Foundation.
Share Ownership of Directors and Officers
Set forth below is information regarding the shares of Common Stock of the Corporation (our only outstanding class of equity securities) owned beneficially on April 1, 2002 (except as otherwise noted) by all directors and nominees, each of the executive officers named in the Summary Compensation Table on page 12, and all directors and executive officers of the Corporation as a group.
Name of Individual or Number of Persons in Group |
Aggregate Number of Common Shares Beneficially Owned(1) |
Acquirable within 60 Days(2) |
Percent of Outstanding Shares as of April 1, 2002 |
||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Roger A. Enrico | 10,938 | 55,981 | * | ||||
William W. George | 50,382 | (3) | 55,981 | * | |||
Michele J. Hooper | 19,243 | 55,981 | * | ||||
James A. Johnson | 20,562 | 47,365 | * | ||||
Richard M. Kovacevich | 53,706 | 40,309 | * | ||||
Anne M. Mulcahy | 5,746 | 31,017 | * | ||||
Stephen W. Sanger | 7,926 | 47,365 | * | ||||
Warren R. Staley | 1,689 | 0 | * | ||||
George W. Tamke | 3,966 | 20,631 | * | ||||
Solomon D. Trujillo | 10,134 | 55,981 | * | ||||
Robert J. Ulrich(4) | 1,086,231 | (5) | 4,810,436 | * | |||
Gregg W. Steinhafel(4) | 198,461 | (5) | 894,291 | * |
Gerald L. Storch(4) | 109,560 | (5) | 571,661 | * | |||
Bart Butzer(4) | 72,956 | (5)(6) | 308,349 | * | |||
Douglas A. Scovanner(4) | 82,246 | (5)(7) | 312,429 | * | |||
All directors and executive officers of the Corporation as a group (25 persons) | 2,142,148 | (8) | 9,441,328 | 1.3 | % |
Largest Owners of the Corporation's Shares
The table below sets forth certain information, as to each person or entity known to us to be the beneficial owner of more than 5 percent of any class of our voting securities:
Name and Address of Beneficial Owner |
Number of Common Shares Beneficially Owned |
Percent of Class |
|||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
State Street Bank and Trust Company 225 Franklin Street Boston, Massachusetts 02110 |
82,356,867 |
(1) |
9.1 |
% |
|
|
|
|
Long-Term Compensation |
|
||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
Annual Compensation |
Awards |
Payouts |
|
||||||||||
Name and Principal Position |
Year |
Salary($)(1) |
Bonus ($)(1)(2) |
Restricted Stock Awards($)(3) |
Securities Underlying Options(#)(4) |
LTIP Payouts ($)(5) |
All Other Compensation ($)(6)(7) |
||||||||
Robert J. Ulrich Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Corporation and Target Stores |
2001 2000 1999 |
1,415,311 1,242,740 1,027,874 |
3,700,000 2,500,000 3,500,000 |
0 0 0 |
625,000 750,000 0 |
0 0 4,756,597 |
922,437 659,810 515,731 |
(8) |
|||||||
Gregg W. Steinhafel President of Target Stores |
2001 2000 1999 |
872,115 830,890 726,375 |
814,027 542,951 1,205,143 |
0 0 0 |
147,059 205,909 206,778 |
0 0 1,697,642 |
316,461 259,612 208,085 |
(9) |
|||||||
Gerald L. Storch Vice Chairman of the Corporation |
2001 2000 1999 |
752,060 625,962 520,833 |
531,037 277,908 629,943 |
0 0 0 |
183,824 249,475 118,166 |
0 0 1,131,902 |
154,948 160,698 128,665 |
(10) |
|||||||
Bart Butzer Executive Vice President of Target Stores |
2001 2000 1999 |
622,115 566,667 566,667 |
598,215 909,216 272,203 |
0 0 0 |
98,040 117,663 103,394 |
0 0 678,974 |
166,193 79,469 62,894 |
(11) |
|||||||
Douglas A. Scovanner Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Corporation |
2001 2000 1999 |
647,211 613,220 584,294 |
446,495 263,459 629,943 |
0 0 0 |
110,295 117,663 118,166 |
0 0 1,131,902 |
139,077 141,275 86,000 |
(12) |
|
Number |
Value |
|||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Robert J. Ulrich | 123,348 | $ | 5,347,136 | ||
Gregg W. Steinhafel | 27,360 | $ | 1,186,056 | ||
Gerald L. Storch | 17,220 | $ | 746,487 | ||
Bart Butzer | 12,828 | $ | 556,094 | ||
Douglas A. Scovanner | 14,256 | $ | 617,998 |
$ | 7,810 | TGT 401(k) Plan matching contribution | |
$ | 185,733 | deferred compensation credit for matching contributions which could not be made to the TGT 401(k) Plan | |
$ | 726,494 | reportable earnings on deferred compensation | |
$ | 2,400 | cost of life insurance paid by the Corporation |
$ | 8,630 | TGT 401(k) Plan matching contribution | |
$ | 61,950 | deferred compensation credit for matching contributions which could not be made to the TGT 401(k) Plan | |
$ | 245,065 | reportable earnings on deferred compensation | |
$ | 816 | cost of life insurance paid by the Corporation |
$ | 9,467 | TGT 401(k) Plan matching contribution | |
$ | 42,030 | deferred compensation credit for matching contributions which could not be made to the TGT 401(k) Plan | |
$ | 103,070 | reportable earnings on deferred compensation | |
$ | 381 | cost of life insurance paid by the Corporation |
$ | 8,528 | TGT 401(k) Plan matching contribution | |
$ | 73,931 | deferred compensation credit for matching contributions which could not be made to the TGT 401(k) Plan | |
$ | 83,359 | reportable earnings on deferred compensation | |
$ | 375 | cost of life insurance paid by the Corporation |
$ | 7,046 | TGT 401(k) Plan matching contribution | |
$ | 36,620 | deferred compensation credit for matching contributions which could not be made to the TGT 401(k) Plan | |
$ | 95,003 | reportable earnings on deferred compensation | |
$ | 408 | cost of life insurance paid by the Corporation |
OPTION GRANTS IN LAST FISCAL YEAR
|
Individual Grants |
Potential Realizable Value at Assumed Annual Rates of Stock Price Appreciation for Option Term(3) |
|||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Name |
Number of Securities Underlying Options Granted (#)(1) |
% of Total Options Granted to Employees in Fiscal Year(%) |
Exercise or Base Price ($/SH) |
Expiration Date |
5%($) |
10%($) |
|||||||
Robert J. Ulrich | 625,000 | (2) | 13.31 | % | 40.80 | 1/09/12 | 16,036,813 | 40,640,433 | |||||
Gregg W. Steinhafel | 147,059 | (2) | 3.13 | % | 40.80 | 1/09/12 | 3,773,372 | 9,562,466 | |||||
Gerald L. Storch | 183,824 | (2) | 3.91 | % | 40.80 | 1/09/12 | 4,716,722 | 11,953,099 | |||||
Bart Butzer | 98,040 | (2) | 2.09 | % | 40.80 | 1/09/12 | 2,515,599 | 6,375,021 | |||||
Douglas A. Scovanner | 110,295 | (2) | 2.35 | % | 40.80 | 1/09/12 | 2,830,048 | 7,171,898 | |||||
All Shareholders | 23.2 billion | (4) | 58.8 billion | (4) |
AGGREGATED OPTION EXERCISES IN LAST FISCAL YEAR
AND FISCAL YEAR END OPTION VALUES
|
|
|
|
|
Value of Unexercised In-the-Money Options at Fiscal Year End ($) |
|||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options at Fiscal Year End (#) |
|||||||||
Name |
Shares Acquired on Exercise (#) |
Value Realized ($) |
||||||||||
Exercisable |
Unexercisable |
Exercisable |
Unexercisable |
|||||||||
Robert J. Ulrich | 312,540 | 10,032,997 | 3,127,800 | 3,187,500 | 110,247,434 | 54,575,969 | ||||||
Gregg W. Steinhafel | 400,000 | 13,197,027 | 894,291 | 471,315 | 21,862,504 | 4,063,852 | ||||||
Gerald L. Storch | 392,584 | 11,840,206 | 521,661 | 538,828 | 11,108,909 | 5,314,139 | ||||||
Bart Butzer | 0 | 0 | 302,133 | 502,416 | 6,494,750 | 9,795,749 | ||||||
Douglas A. Scovanner | 200,000 | 6,096,290 | 412,429 | 281,351 | 9,838,315 | 2,150,481 |
No officer of the Corporation is a party to an employment contract with the Corporation. As an alternative to the use of such contracts, the Corporation has adopted an Income Continuance Policy (the "ICP") and a Senior Management Group Income Continuance Policy for certain officers of the Corporation (the "SMG ICP").
Mr. Ulrich, together with others, participates in the ICP. In 1988, the ICP was amended to exclude additional participants. Executives Steinhafel, Storch, Butzer and Scovanner were not participants under the ICP at the time it was amended. In the event a participant's employment is terminated by the Corporation, the ICP participant's compensation (current salary and average of three most recent bonuses) continues for a period of 18 to 24 months, depending on his or her length of service. If the participant's service with the Corporation is less than three years, the continuation is for 18 months; over eight years, the continuation is for 24 months; and between three and eight years, a number of months determined by a schedule (more than 18 months but less than 24 months).
Participants under the SMG ICP are members of the Corporation's Senior Management Group who are not participants under the ICP. The policy is similar to the ICP, except its time parameters are based on the participant's salary grade. Compensation may extend from 12 months to 24 months, based on a schedule which provides longer income continuation to those participants with higher grade levels. Executives Steinhafel, Storch, Butzer and Scovanner participate in the SMG ICP.
All executive officers who are members of the Corporation's Senior Management Group are covered by one of these policies. Both policies require that participants must provide the Corporation a release of claims and they include offset provisions for certain other compensation from the Corporation and may include non-disparagement, non-competition and other requirements. Both policies provide that the policies cannot be terminated or amended to reduce future benefits unless two years' prior notice is given to the participants in the policies. Both policies also provide that any executive who terminates employment or is terminated within two years of a change in control (as defined in the Corporation's Long-Term Incentive Plans) will be paid the present value of payments owing under the policies immediately after termination.
When an executive's employment with the Corporation terminates, the executive receives payments in accordance with the specific guidelines under each of the Corporation's deferred compensation plan(s), 401(k) Plan and pension plans. Executives may also be entitled to exercise previously granted stock options that are then outstanding and, in certain circumstances, receive previously granted performance shares and restricted stock under the Corporation's Long-Term Incentive Plans that are then outstanding. Further information regarding stock options, performance shares and restricted stock is provided in the Report of the Compensation Committee on Executive Compensation.
All executive officers and other employees of the Corporation and our subsidiaries who have worked over 1,000 hours in a year and are at least 21 years of age are covered by the Corporation's pension plans.
The following table shows the annual benefits under the Corporation's pension plans at age 65, on a life only basis, given the years of service and compensation levels set forth below:
Pension Plan Table
Average Compensation |
15 Years of Service |
20 Years of Service |
25 Years of Service |
30 Years of Service |
35 Years of Service |
|||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
$ | 100,000 | $ | 15,375 | $ | 20,500 | $ | 25,625 | $ | 26,875 | $ | 28,125 | |||||
200,000 | 34,875 | 46,500 | 58,125 | 60,625 | 63,125 | |||||||||||
300,000 | 54,375 | 72,500 | 90,625 | 94,375 | 98,125 | |||||||||||
400,000 | 73,875 | 98,500 | 123,125 | 128,125 | 133,125 | |||||||||||
500,000 | 93,375 | 124,500 | 155,625 | 161,875 | 168,125 | |||||||||||
1,000,000 | 190,875 | 254,500 | 318,125 | 330,625 | 343,125 | |||||||||||
2,000,000 | 385,875 | 514,500 | 643,125 | 668,125 | 693,125 | |||||||||||
3,000,000 | 580,875 | 774,500 | 968,125 | 1,005,625 | 1,043,125 | |||||||||||
4,000,000 | 775,875 | 1,034,500 | 1,293,125 | 1,343,125 | 1,393,125 | |||||||||||
5,000,000 | 970,875 | 1,294,500 | 1,618,125 | 1,680,625 | 1,743,125 |
Currently under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act, as amended ("ERISA"), the maximum annual amount that can be paid under the Qualified Pension Plans to any individual is $160,000, unless grandfathered under prior limits. Amounts in excess of that maximum are paid under separate plans. In addition, the Corporation has supplemental plans that use substantially the same formula as the Qualified Pension Plans use to pay benefits on compensation that is excluded from the Qualified Pension Plans formula by ERISA. The years of present credited service for benefit purposes of the Corporation's executive officers named in the Summary Compensation Table are as follows: Executives Ulrich, 34 years; Steinhafel, 22 years; Storch, 9 years; Butzer, 19 years; and Scovanner, 8 years. Average Compensation is the average cash remuneration, including deferred compensation, for the highest five calendar years of credited service in the last ten years. The compensation reflected in the "Salary" and "Bonus" columns of the Summary Compensation Table is cash compensation, including deferred compensation, for the fiscal year. If the employment of a participant is terminated prior to age 55, his or her pension will be less than the amount shown in the table, even if commencement of benefit payments is deferred until age 65. The actual amounts payable from the qualified pension trust are not subject to any deductions for Social Security benefits or other offset amounts. In addition to the qualified and supplemental pension plans, all executive officers who are members of the Senior Management Group participate in a program whereby such person's surviving spouse (or in the case of an officer who is single at retirement, that person's designated beneficiary) will receive the equivalent of a joint and 100% surviving spouse option, as calculated under the qualified pension plan, but without reference to compensation limits, payable to the officer's spouse or designated beneficiary for as long as he or she lives. The Corporation also has a supplemental plan that may, at the discretion of the Board, treat certain of its Senior Management Group as being five years older, but not older than 65, for purposes of the actuarial reduction of pension benefits at early retirement. All supplemental plans pay the lump sum present value of their respective benefits in the year following retirement. The pension table reflects amounts payable under all pension plans, whether qualified or non-qualified.
Report of the Compensation Committee on Executive Compensation
The Corporation has a pay-for-performance compensation philosophy for management employees, including executive officers. The total compensation plan for executive officers includes base salary and the opportunity for an annual incentive bonus, long-term incentive compensation and other benefits.
The Compensation Committee is responsible for developing and administering the total compensation plan for executive officers of the Corporation. In addition, the Compensation Committee reviews the performance and compensation levels of executive officers who are members of the top management group, the Corporate Operating Committee. Individual written performance appraisals are given annually to each executive officer, including the Chief Executive Officer (the "CEO").
Pursuant to the Corporation's pay-for-performance philosophy, the compensation policies established by the Compensation Committee provide that a significant portion of each executive officer's annual compensation is contingent upon the financial performance of the Corporation or relevant operating company, as well as the individual performance of the executive officer.
Individual Performance Evaluations
Mr. Ulrich is separately evaluated in his roles as Chairman of the Board and as CEO. The Compensation Committee, together with all other independent directors, established the performance criteria used to evaluate Mr. Ulrich's fiscal 2001 performance. A variety of factors are used to evaluate Mr. Ulrich's performance as CEO including operating company performance, control of the business, community relations, community involvement, management succession planning, strategic planning, business development, organizational development and formulation and delivery of major corporate policies. In his role as Chairman of the Board, Mr. Ulrich was evaluated on his ability to chair effective meetings of the Board of Directors and the Executive Committee, keep the Board fully informed of the condition of the Corporation, develop sound corporate governance policies and work with the directors to effectively use their talents to the best strategic advantage of the Corporation.
The Compensation Committee prepares an annual written evaluation of Mr. Ulrich's performance and determines his personal score. The written evaluation was reviewed with Mr. Ulrich and his performance was discussed with him in a meeting with all of the independent directors. All other executive officers of the Corporation received performance appraisals and personal scores based on prescribed objectives such as strategy execution, key job responsibilities, financial performance, community involvement and succession planning.
The Compensation Committee reviews a variety of factors before making base salary decisions. When the Compensation Committee considered Mr. Ulrich's current base salary, it reviewed information prepared by an independent compensation consultant covering a representative group of employers in retail and general industry throughout the United States (the "Competitive Survey"). Many of the companies included in the S&P 500 Retailing Peer Index in the stock performance graph are included in the Competitive Survey.
Base salaries of the other executive officers of the Corporation are based on competitive practices, and are at approximately the 60th percentile of base salary when compared with the same representative group of domestic retailers and general industry, adjusted for the size of the companies. Executive officers receive a higher base salary than the industry median because the threshold for payout of short-term incentive compensation by the Corporation is set at a higher level than it is for a majority of competitive retailers. Increases in base salary result from promotional increases reflecting job scope changes and from merit increases determined by the executive's personal score, the executive's position in the salary range and the Corporation's performance. Merit increase guidelines are established each year based on the performance of the Corporation and current economic and market conditions. Once overall guidelines are established and an individual performance score is assigned, the actual percentage increase is affected by the executive's position in the salary range for his or her grade; that is, the lower the placement in the range the greater the percentage increase.
Short-Term Incentive Compensation
The Corporation's Executive Short-Term Incentive Plan (referred to generally as "STIP" or "Executive Short-Term Incentive Plan") for fiscal 2001 included three performance measures: PTOC (pre-tax operating contribution), EVA (economic value added) and personal score. Under the STIP, Mr. Ulrich, the executive officers and certain other members of the senior management of the Corporation and its operating companies were eligible for annual incentive bonuses for fiscal 2001. Item Three of this Proxy Statement (see pages 23-25), solicits shareholder approval of an amended Executive Short-Term Incentive Plan.
The maximum bonus payable to an officer covered by the limitations set forth in Section 162(m) of the Tax Code under the STIP is 400% of that person's salary set forth in the Proxy Statement for the year during which the bonus was earned. If the covered officer held a different office or was not employed in his or her position for the full year covered by that Proxy Statement, the maximum bonus is 400% of the highest salary reported in such year. However, for purposes of calculating the maximum bonus payable to any covered officer during fiscal 2001, the salary of the participant may not exceed 200% of the fiscal 1996 salary of the CEO as reported in the Summary Compensation Table in the Corporation's Proxy Statement dated April 14, 1997. The aggregate of all bonuses payable to any other executive under the STIP may not exceed 400% of his or her base salary.
PTOC. PTOC is the same as pre-tax segment profit which is earnings from operations before LIFO, securitization effects, interest, other expense and unusual items. The PTOC part of the STIP measures the Corporation's (or an operating company's or other division of the Corporation's) performance against annually pre-determined PTOC goals to determine bonus amounts. The outside directors set PTOC goals when establishing other financial performance goals for the Corporation and its divisions. The Compensation Committee then uses the PTOC goals to establish the PTOC bonus range for use with the PTOC part of the STIP. The PTOC Score for the fiscal year is determined from a schedule, approved by the Compensation Committee, that designates a score for each varying level of PTOC performance achieved by the Corporation or one of its divisions. The Compensation Committee also adopts a "bonus matrix" which assigns varying bonus payouts based on the participant's job grade and PTOC Score.
The bonus amount for each participant is calculated by multiplying the participant's bonus percentage from the bonus matrix by the midpoint of the salary range of the participant's job grade level (except for Mr. Ulrich, whose base salary is used), and then multiplying that result by the participant's percentage of participation in the PTOC part of the STIP. In order to receive a bonus under the PTOC part of the STIP, a participant's personal score must equal or exceed a minimum score set by the Compensation Committee.
EVA. EVA is PTOC after taxes less a Capital Charge. The "Capital Charge" is the cost of capital invested in the business operation, adjusted for the maturity of the assets employed by that business operation. The EVA part of the STIP measures the Corporation's or a division's performance against annually pre-determined EVA goals to determine bonus amounts. The outside directors set EVA goals in conjunction with establishing other financial performance goals for the Corporation and its divisions. The Compensation Committee then uses the EVA goals to establish the EVA bonus range for use in conjunction with the EVA part of the STIP. The EVA Score for the fiscal year is determined from a schedule, approved by the Compensation Committee, that designates a score for each varying level of EVA performance achieved by the Corporation or a division. The Compensation Committee also adopts a bonus matrix which assigns varying bonus payouts based on the participant's job grade and EVA Score.
The bonus amount for each participant is calculated by multiplying the participant's bonus percentage from the bonus matrix by the midpoint of the salary range of a participant's job grade level (except for Mr. Ulrich, whose base salary is used), and then multiplying that result by the participant's percentage of participation in the EVA part of the STIP. In order to receive a bonus under the EVA part of the STIP a participant's personal score must equal or exceed a minimum score set by the Compensation Committee.
Personal Score. As part of the performance evaluation process, each executive is assigned a personal score. For executives other than Mr. Ulrich, the personal score is applied to the Corporation's STIP (personal score) to determine a bonus amount. For purposes of the STIP, the Compensation Committee adopts a bonus matrix which assigns varying bonus payouts based on the participant's job grade and personal score. The bonus amount for each participant under the STIP is calculated by multiplying the participant's bonus percentage from the bonus matrix by the midpoint of the salary range of the participant's job grade level and then multiplying that result by the participant's percentage of participation in the STIP. Mr. Ulrich's personal score bonus is determined at the Board's discretion.
Fiscal 2001 Bonus Allocation. Mr. Ulrich's bonus for fiscal 2001 based upon the Corporation's financial performance was 50% PTOC (Corporation) and 50% EVA (Corporation), and his personal score bonus was determined at the Board's discretion. Mr. Steinhafel's bonus was based on 331/3 PTOC (Target Stores), 331/3% EVA (Target Stores) and 331/3% personal score. Mr. Storch's bonus was based on 331/3% PTOC (Corporation), 331/3% EVA (Corporation) and 331/3% personal score. Mr. Butzer's bonus was based on 331/3% PTOC (Mervyn's for three months, Target Stores for nine months), 331/3% EVA (Mervyn's for three months, Target Stores for nine months) and 331/3% personal score. Mr. Scovanner's bonus was based on 331/3% PTOC (Corporation), 331/3% EVA (Corporation) and 331/3% personal score.
Long-Term Incentive Compensation
The Compensation Committee determines the amount of options, performance shares and restricted stock awarded annually under the Long-Term Incentive Plan of 1999 (the "LTIP"). The Compensation Committee reviews data prepared by an independent compensation consultant covering a representative group of employers in retail and general industry and sets the grants at the median to 75th percentile (depending on performance) of competitive companies of similar size. The Compensation Committee, using judgment and data from the third party compensation studies, determines the size of long-term compensation awards for the CEO and other Corporate Operating Committee members.
Stock Options. The Compensation Committee approves a long-term incentive stock option pool for annual stock option grants. The size of the pool varies with the Corporation's performance. However, the precise size of the pool each year is based on the subjective judgment of the Compensation Committee. A subcommittee of the Compensation Committee is also authorized to grant stock options from a more limited pool to employees who are not subject to the short-swing trading rules under Section 16(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. The Compensation Committee determined in 2001 that the pools would consist entirely of non-qualified stock options. Individual awards from the pools are based on the individual's responsibilities, performance, potential and grant history. Each option was granted at the market value of the underlying Common Stock on the date of grant and has a ten-year term. The options are generally exercisable 25% after the first year, with an additional 25% after each of the next three years. Awards in any year to any person covered by the limitations in Section 162(m) of the Tax Code may not include more than 4,000,000 shares in the aggregate, subject to certain anti-dilution adjustments.
Performance Shares. Under the LTIP, a performance share consists of the opportunity to receive up to one and one-half shares of the Corporation's Common Stock for every share subject to the award, or a lesser number of shares and a cash payment equal to the fair market value of the remaining shares as may be established by the Plan Committee. The percentage paid in cash must be uniform for all participants in a particular performance period. A performance share at the time of grant is not a fixed commitment of the Corporation but becomes such only as earned by the participants at the end of a performance period. The ultimate number of performance shares with respect to which a recipient is entitled depends upon the level of achievement by the Corporation, operating company, test strategy or new venture, of pre-
established performance goals during applicable performance periods. A performance period under the LTIP consists of a designated period of not less than three consecutive fiscal years.
Under the terms of the only performance shares actually granted under the LTIP, Common Stock was put into escrow and restricted until retirement. Any participant who terminated employment prior to early retirement (age 55 and five years of service) and failed to meet certain requirements forfeited all the Common Stock held in escrow. If the executive terminated employment after age 55 and provided the Corporation with one year's notice of retirement, 100% of the Common Stock was released to the executive. In such cases, if the executive failed to give one year's notice, the shares were forfeited unless the committee administering the Corporation's Long-Term Incentive Plans approved the release of all or part of the shares. If the executive was terminated, qualified for early retirement under the Corporation's pension plans and received payments under the Corporation's Income Continuance Policies ("ICP Payments"), 100% of the Common Stock was paid to the executive. If the executive terminated other than for early retirement and received ICP Payments (but was not part of a reduction in force), 50% of the Common Stock was released to the executive. If the executive did not receive ICP Payments, the executive forfeited all the shares. If at any time the executive's termination was a result of death, total and permanent disability, reduction in force or change of control, 100% of the Common Stock was released to the executive. Recipients held voting and dividend rights for all shares held in escrow during the restriction period; however, they may not have sold or assigned the shares. The performance shares actually awarded provided for the potential to earn awards of Corporation Common Stock during a cycle of four fiscal years. The Corporation has not made any performance share grants since fiscal 1995.
Restricted Stock. The LTIP gives the Plan Committee the authority to award shares of Common Stock which are subject to certain restrictions to eligible participants. Recipients are entitled to vote the restricted stock and to exercise other shareholder rights, except that (i) the Corporation may retain custody of the share certificate during the restriction period of not less than three years, (ii) the participant may not sell, transfer, pledge, exchange or otherwise dispose of the shares during the restriction period and (iii) any dividends that may be payable in cash or in shares or otherwise may be withheld by the Corporation until the restrictions lapse.
The terms of the only restricted stock grants actually made under the LTIP required the executive to remain an employee of the Corporation for four years from the date of grant. Upon expiration of the four-year period, the shares were issued, put into escrow and restricted until retirement. The escrow release events were the same as described above for performance shares. After the shares were issued and put into escrow, holders of restricted stock held voting and dividend rights during the restriction period; however, they may not have sold or assigned the shares. The Corporation has not made any restricted stock grants to executive officers since fiscal 1995.
Corporate Governance and Certain Tax Consequences of Plans
As part of its corporate governance responsibilities, the Compensation Committee, together with all the other outside directors, has established certain measures of performance for members of the Corporate Operating Committee, including the CEO, that it believes are critical to the overall performance of the Corporation. Those measures of performance, which include key employee retention, succession planning and strategic planning, are vital to the long-term performance of the Corporation.
Section 162(m) of the Tax Code prohibits the Corporation from deducting as compensation expense amounts exceeding $1,000,000 a year for the CEO and the other officers named in the Summary Compensation Table relating to the period during which the compensation is earned, unless the payment of such compensation is based on pre-established, objective performance goals approved by the shareholders. A significant part of the Corporation's executive compensation will meet the Tax Code requirements for deductibility under the Section 162(m) rules. A portion of such compensation, however, will continue to be based on critical, subjective measures that may cause certain compensation not to be deductible under the
Tax Code. The Compensation Committee retains the ability to evaluate the performance of members of the Corporate Operating Committee, including the CEO, on vital subjective performance measures.
COMPENSATION COMMITTEE
Roger A. Enrico, Chair
James A. Johnson
Stephen W. Sanger
George W. Tamke
Solomon D. Trujillo
The role of the Audit Committee is to assist the Board of Directors in fulfilling its responsibility to oversee the Corporation's financial reporting process. Management is responsible for our financial statements and reporting process, including our systems of internal controls. The Corporation's independent auditors are responsible for auditing our financial statements and expressing an opinion as to their conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States. A copy of the Audit Committee Position Description, which has been adopted by our Board of Directors and further describes the role of the Audit Committee in overseeing our financial reporting process, was filed as an appendix to the Proxy Statement for our 2001 Annual Meeting.
In performing its functions, the Audit Committee:
Based upon the review and discussions described in this report, and subject to the limitations on the role and responsibilities of the Audit Committee referred to above and in the Audit Committee Position Description, the Audit Committee recommended to the Board of Directors (and the Board has approved) that the audited financial statements be included in the Corporation's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended February 2, 2002, for filing with the SEC.
AUDIT COMMITTEE
Michele J. Hooper, Chair
Roger A. Enrico
William W. George
Richard M. Kovacevich
ITEM TWOAPPOINTMENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS
Proxies solicited by the Board of Directors will, unless otherwise directed, be voted to approve the appointment by the Board of Directors of Ernst & Young LLP as independent auditors of the Corporation and its subsidiaries for the fiscal year ending February 1, 2003. Ernst & Young LLP has been employed in this capacity by the Corporation since 1931.
A representative from Ernst & Young LLP will be at the Annual Meeting and will have the opportunity to make a statement if such representative so desires and will be available to respond to questions during the meeting.
Ernst & Young LLP billed the Corporation the following fees for services provided in fiscal year 2001:
Audit Fees: | $ | 1,200,000 | |
Audit-related Fees (relating primarily to benefit plan audits and Form 5500s, accounting consultations, and SEC registration statements): | $ | 300,000 | |
Financial Information Systems Design and Implementation Fees: |
$ | 0 | |
All Other Fees (relating primarily to tax planning services): | $ | 400,000 |
THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE CORPORATION RECOMMENDS THAT THE SHAREHOLDERS OF THE CORPORATION VOTE TO APPROVE THE APPOINTMENT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP AS INDEPENDENT AUDITORS.
ITEM THREEAPPROVAL OF THE CORPORATION'S AMENDED EXECUTIVE
SHORT-TERM INCENTIVE PLAN
Subject to shareholder approval, the Board of Directors amended the Corporation's Executive Short-Term Incentive Plan (the "STIP"). The purposes of the amendment are to promote the Corporation's pay-for-performance compensation philosophy by giving the Compensation Committee discretion to choose the appropriate standard or standards by which to measure executives' performances in any given fiscal year and to update the base year for determining maximum bonuses payable under the STIP. The performance criteria would be set at the beginning of each fiscal year. The basic features of the STIP and the amendment are summarized below. The amendment will not become effective unless approved by the shareholders.
The current STIP combines subjective (Personal Score) and objective (PTOC and EVA) performance measures to evaluate participant performance as described above in the Report of the Compensation Committee on Executive Compensation. The Compensation Committee believes that the performance measures, including the new performance measures contained in the amendment to the STIP, promote the Corporation's pay-for-performance philosophy.
Before the amendment, the STIP's objective performance criteria measured the Corporation's (or an operating company's or other division's) performance against annually predetermined goals based on PTOC (pre-tax operating contribution) and EVA (economic value added) to determine bonus amounts. For fiscal 2002, the Compensation Committee would continue to use the same PTOC and EVA performance criteria, but the amendment would give the Compensation Committee the discretion to
choose one or more appropriate standards for measuring performance in future fiscal years from among the following:
When the Compensation Committee determines the appropriate standards for measuring performance for a fiscal year, it also sets annual goals for those standards in conjunction with establishing other financial performance goals for the Corporation, its operating companies and/or divisions. The Compensation Committee then uses the goals to establish the bonus ranges for use in conjunction with the STIP and determines what level of bonuses will be paid if performance falls within the bonus ranges.
Eligibility. Participation in the STIP is limited to upper-level executive employees of the Corporation and its operating companies. The Compensation Committee determines which executives participate in the plan and the percentage level of participation. Approximately 110 executive employees are eligible to participate in the STIP.
Determination of Bonus Amounts. Bonuses may be determined and awarded on the basis of one or more performance standards chosen by the Compensation Committee. The Compensation Committee may select different standards for different participants in any fiscal year. Scores for each performance standard for the fiscal year are determined from performance schedules, approved by the Compensation Committee, that designate a score for each varying level of performance achieved by a division, an operating company and/or the Corporation. The Compensation Committee also adopts a matrix that assigns varying bonus percentages based on the participant's job grade and performance- standard scores. Bonuses are then determined under a non-pooled or pooled calculation at the discretion of the Compensation Committee.
Non-Pooled Bonuses. The bonus amount for each participant is calculated by multiplying the participant's bonus percentage from the relevant bonus matrix by the midpoint of the salary range of the participant's job grade level and then multiplying that result by the participant's percentage of participation in the plan. In order to receive a bonus under the STIP, a participant's score under the portion of the personal score plan must equal or exceed a minimum score set by the Compensation Committee.
Pooled Bonuses. The bonus amount for each participant is calculated in the same manner as for the non-pooled bonuses; however, all related bonus amounts are added together to form a bonus pool. The bonus payable to each participant under the STIP is based on a ratio of the participant's bonus to all bonuses earned under the STIP. The percentage determined by that ratio will be multiplied by the bonus pool.
Maximum Bonuses. The maximum bonus payable under the STIP to any participant for any year is equal to 400% of that person's salary for the year during which the bonus was earned. If the participant held a different office or was not employed in his or her position for the full year, then the maximum bonus is 400% of the highest annualized salary rate paid to that person in that year. In addition, for purposes of calculating the maximum bonus payable to the CEO or any other covered officer of the Corporation, the salary of the participant may not exceed 200% of the salary earned by the Corporation's CEO for fiscal 2001 (fiscal 1996 prior to the amendment) as reported in this Proxy Statement.
Tax Matters. As described in the Report of the Compensation Committee on Executive Compensation contained in this Proxy Statement, the Section 162(m) cap limits the Corporation's tax
deduction to $1 million per year for certain compensation paid to each of the Corporation's covered officers. This limitation does not apply to "performance-based compensation." Bonus awards paid under the objective performance criteria established under the STIP will continue to qualify as performance-based compensation if shareholders approve the proposed amendment.
The amendment will allow the Compensation Committee to choose the appropriate performance-measurement standard in light of the Corporation's current goals and industry trends. Shareholder approval of the amendment will also enable the Corporation to continue to comply with the technical provisions of the Section 162(m) cap and preserve the deductibility of performance-based compensation paid to the covered officers. The tax benefits derived from such deductions preserve corporate assets and benefit the Corporation and its shareholders.
Amounts payable under the STIP for fiscal 2002 are not determinable because amounts payable under the amended STIP are contingent upon performance during the year and upon the performance-measurement standards to be chosen by the Compensation Committee. The benefits payable under the STIP during fiscal 2001, before giving effect to the amendment (which are the same benefits reported under the Summary Compensation Table on page 12), were as follows:
NEW PLAN BENEFITS
(Benefits payable for fiscal 2001)
Executive Short-Term Incentive Plan
Name and Position |
Dollar Value ($) |
|
---|---|---|
Robert J. Ulrich Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Corporation and Target Stores |
3,700,000 | |
Gregg W. Steinhafel President of Target Stores |
814,027 |
|
Gerald L. Storch Vice Chairman of the Corporation |
531,037 |
|
Bart Butzer Executive Vice President of Target Stores |
598,215 |
|
Douglas A. Scovanner Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Corporation |
446,495 |
|
Executive Group (15 persons) |
9,085,494 |
|
Non-Executive Outside Director Group (10 persons) |
0 |
|
Non-Executive Officer Employee Group (93 persons) |
10,711,995 |
THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE CORPORATION RECOMMENDS THAT SHAREHOLDERS APPROVE THE AMENDED EXECUTIVE SHORT-TERM INCENTIVE PLAN.
Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance
The SEC rules require disclosure of those directors, officers and beneficial owners of more than 10% of the Corporation's Common Stock who fail to file on a timely basis reports required by Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the most recent fiscal year. Based solely on review of reports furnished to the Corporation and written representations that no other reports were required during the fiscal year ended February 2, 2002, all Section 16(a) filing requirements were met.
Vendor Standards and Compliance
To ensure that the products we carry in our stores are made legally and ethically, we require our vendors to abide by certain standards. Copies of those standards and a report relating to vendor compliance with those standards are available upon request from our Corporate Secretary and at www.target.com (click on "Company," "Target Corporation," "About Us" and "Vendor Compliance").
We believe that attracting and retaining an employee population reflecting the diversity of our guests and communities we serve is an important goal and will provide a competitive advantage. We are an equal opportunity employer and we communicate to our employees information regarding equal employment opportunities. We also encourage the use of minority and women-owned contractors and service providers and we support the efforts of our employees, suppliers and vendors to adhere to these principles of corporate responsibility.
We provide detailed statistical information on equal employment opportunity to the federal government as required by law. Information regarding our diversity programs and its diverse employee population are available upon request from our Corporate Secretary.
For the benefit of hearing impaired persons, a sign language interpreter will be present at our 2002 Annual Meeting.
We have adopted a procedure approved by the SEC called "householding." Under this procedure, certain shareholders of record who have the same address and last name and do not participate in electronic delivery of proxy materials will receive only one copy of our Annual Report and Proxy Statement, unless one or more of these shareholders notifies us that they would like to continue to receive individual copies. This will reduce our printing costs and postage fees. Shareholders who participate in householding will continue to receive separate proxy cards. Also, householding will not in any way affect dividend check mailings.
If you and other shareholders of record with whom you share an address currently receive multiple copies of our Annual Report and/or Proxy Statement, or if you hold stock in more than one account, and in either case, you would like to receive only a single copy of the Annual Report or Proxy Statement for your household, please contact our Investor Relations representative by e-mail at investorrelations@target.com, by mail to our Vice President, Investor Relations, at the address listed on the cover of this proxy statement or by telephone at (612) 761-6736.
If you participate in householding and would like to receive a separate copy of our 2001 Annual Report or this Proxy Statement, please contact us in the manner described in the immediately preceding paragraph. We will deliver the requested documents to you promptly upon receipt of your request.
Shareholder proposals for consideration at the Corporation's 2003 Annual Meeting must follow the procedures set forth in Rule 14a-8 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the Corporation's By-laws. To be timely under Rule 14a-8, they must be received by our Corporate Secretary by December 16, 2002 in order to be included in the Proxy Statement. Under the Corporation's By-laws, as amended, if a shareholder plans to propose an item of business to be considered at any annual meeting of shareholders, that shareholder is required to give notice of such proposal to our Corporate Secretary at least 90 days prior to the anniversary of the most recent annual meeting, or by February 21, 2003 for our 2003 Annual Meeting, and to comply with certain other requirements. The proposals also must comply with all applicable statutes and regulations.
www.target.com
Proxy Solicited on Behalf of the Board of Directors for
Annual Meeting of Shareholders May 22, 2002
P R O X Y |
Robert J. Ulrich, Douglas A. Scovanner and James T. Hale, and each of them, are hereby appointed proxies, with power of substitution to each, to represent and to vote as
designated below and on the reverse side hereof, all shares of capital stock of Target Corporation, a Minnesota corporation, held by the undersigned at the Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be held on May 22, 2002, and at any adjournment thereof.
This Proxy will be voted as directed, but if no direction is given it will be voted FOR proposals set forth in Items 1, 2 and 3. The proxies cannot vote your shares unless you vote by telephone or the Internet or unless you
sign this card on the reverse side and return it. For participants in the Target Corporation 401(k) Plan, this proxy card will constitute voting instructions to the Trustee under this Plan. As a participant in this Plan, the undersigned understands that, in accordance with the terms of the Plan, these instructions shall be held in the strictest confidence by the Trustee and shall not be divulged or released to any person, including officers or employees of the Company. These instructions will be followed as directed, but if no direction is given, the Trustee is instructed to vote FOR proposals set forth in Items 1, 2 and 3. Shares held in the Plan for which no voting instructions are received by the Trustee, as well as shares not allocated to any participants, will be voted in the same proportion as votes actually cast by Plan participants. Instruction cards received by the Trustee after May 17, 2002, will not be counted. |
|
(INSTRUCTION: To withhold authority to vote for any named nominee or a substitute nominee designated by the Board of Directors, write that nominee's name or the words "substitute nominee" on the space provided on the reverse side.) |
SEE
REVERSE
SIDE
...................................................................................................................................................................................................................
FOLD
AND DETACH HERE
ANNUAL MEETING
OF
TARGET CORPORATION SHAREHOLDERS
Wednesday, May 22, 2002
9:30 a.m. CDT
The Children's Theatre
2400 Third Avenue South
Minneapolis, Minnesota
Please present this ADMISSION TICKET at the Annual
Shareholders' Meeting as verification of your
Target Corporation share ownership.
/X/ Please mark your votes as in this example. | 0361 |
As an alternative to completing this form, you may vote by telephone or through the internet by following the instructions below.
The Board of Directors recommends a vote FOR proposals 1, 2 and 3.
Election of Directors, Nominees:
01. Roger
A. Enrico
02. William W. George
03. James A. Johnson
/ / FOR / / WITHHELD
For, except withheld from the following nominee(s):
.....................................................................................................................................................................................................................
/ / FOR / / AGAINST / / ABSTAIN
/ / FOR / / AGAINST / / ABSTAIN
The proxies are authorized to vote upon such other business as may properly come before the meeting in accordance with the recommendation of the Board of Directors, or, in the absence of such a recommendation, in the proxies' discretion.
Mark here if you would like your voting instructions to be confidential pursuant to the Target Corporation Policy on Confidential Voting described in the 2002 Proxy Statement. / /
Signature(s) ........................................................................................................................ |
Date ...................................... |
NOTE: | Please sign exactly as name appears hereon. Joint owners should each sign. When signing as attorney, executor, administrator, trustee or guardian, please give full title as such. |
............................................................................................................................................................................................................
FOLD AND DETACH HERE
Target Corporation encourages you to take advantage of a new and convenient way by which you can vote your shareseither by telephone or through the Internet.
- By Telephone. On a touch-tone telephone call toll-free 1-877-PRX-VOTE
(1-877-779-8683). Listen to the recorded instructions, use the
control number printed in the box in the upper right corner of this proxy card to access the system, and use your telephone
key pad to vote.
- Through the Internet. Access the World Wide Web site www.eproxyvote.com/tgt and follow the instructions posted on the
web site.
Your vote by telephone or through the Internet authorizes the proxies named on the front of this proxy card in the same manner as if you marked, signed, dated and returned the proxy card. If you choose to vote your shares by either of these electronic means, there is no need for you to mail back your proxy card.
Your vote is important. Thank you for voting.