20-F
As filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 23, 2017
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM
20-F
ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the
fiscal year ended December 31, 2016
Commission file number 1-13202
Nokia Corporation
(Exact name of Registrant
as specified in its charter)
Republic of Finland
(Jurisdiction of incorporation)
Karaportti 3
FI-02610 Espoo, Finland
(Address of principal executive offices)
Riikka Tieaho, Vice President, Corporate Legal, Telephone: +358 (0) 10 44 88 000, Facsimile: +358 (0) 10 44 81 002, Karaportti 3, FI-02610 Espoo, Finland
(Name, Telephone, E-mail and/or Facsimile number and Address
of Company Contact Person)
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the Exchange
Act):
|
|
|
Title of each class |
|
Name of each exchange on which registered |
American Depositary Shares |
|
New York Stock Exchange |
Shares |
|
New York Stock Exchange(1) |
(1) Not for trading, but only in connection with the registration of American Depositary Shares representing these shares, pursuant to the
requirements of the Securities and Exchange Commission.
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Exchange Act: None
Securities for which there is a reporting obligation pursuant to Section 15(d) of the Exchange Act:
5.375% Notes due 2019 and 6.625% Notes due 2039.
|
|
|
Indicate the number of outstanding shares of each of the registrants classes of capital or common stock as of the close of the period covered by the annual report. Shares: 5 836 055
012. |
|
|
|
|
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. |
|
Yes ☒
No ☐ |
|
|
If this report is an annual or transition report, indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act. |
|
Yes ☐
No ☒ |
|
|
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter
period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. |
|
Yes ☒
No ☐ |
|
|
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of large
accelerated filer, accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one): |
|
|
|
|
|
Large accelerated filer ☒ |
|
Accelerated filer ☐ |
Non-accelerated filer ☐ (Do not check if a smaller reporting company) |
|
Smaller reporting company ☐ |
Indicate by check mark which basis of accounting the registrant has used to prepare the financial statements included in this filing:
U.S. GAAP ☐
International Financial Reporting Standards as issued by the International Accounting Standards
Board ☒
Other ☐
|
|
|
If Other has been checked in response to the previous question, indicate by check mark which financial statement item the registrant has elected to follow. |
|
Item 17 ☐ Item 18
☐ |
|
|
If this is an annual report, indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). |
|
Yes ☐ No
☒ |
Cross-reference table
to Form
20-F
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Form 20-F
Item Number |
|
Form 20-F Heading |
|
Section in Document |
ITEM |
|
1 |
|
IDENTITY OF DIRECTORS, SENIOR |
|
N/A |
|
|
|
|
MANAGEMENT AND ADVISERS |
|
|
ITEM |
|
2 |
|
OFFER STATISTICS AND EXPECTED |
|
N/A |
|
|
|
|
TIMETABLE |
|
|
ITEM |
|
3 |
|
KEY INFORMATION |
|
|
|
|
3A |
|
Selected Financial Data |
|
General facts on NokiaSelected financial data |
|
|
3B |
|
Capitalization and Indebtedness |
|
N/A |
|
|
3C |
|
Reasons for the Offer and Use of Proceeds |
|
N/A |
|
|
3D |
|
Risk Factors |
|
Operating and financial review and prospectsRisk factors |
ITEM |
|
4 |
|
INFORMATION ON THE COMPANY |
|
|
|
|
4A |
|
History and Development of the Company |
|
Cover page, Overview, Introduction and use of certain terms; General facts on NokiaOur history; Operating and financial review and prospectsLiquidity and capital resources; Operating and
financial review and prospectsMaterial subsequent events; Financial statementsNotes to consolidated financial statementsNote 4, Segment information; Financial statementsNotes to consolidated financial statementsNote 5,
Acquisitions |
|
|
4B |
|
Business Overview |
|
Business overview; Operating and financial review and prospects Principal industry trends affecting our operations; Financial statementsNotes to consolidated financial
statementsNote 4, Segment information; General facts on NokiaGovernment regulation |
|
|
4C |
|
Organizational Structure |
|
OverviewThis is NokiaOrganizational structure and reportable segments; Financial statementsNotes to consolidated financial statementsNote 4, Segment information; Financial
statementsNotes to consolidated financial statementsNote 32, Principal Group companies |
|
|
4D |
|
Property, Plants and Equipment |
|
Business overview; Financial statementsNotes to consolidated financial statementsNote 2, Significant accounting policies; Financial statementsNotes to consolidated financial
statementsNote 6, Disposals treated as Discontinued operations; Financial statementsNotes to consolidated financial statementsNote 15, Property, plant and equipment |
|
|
4A |
|
UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS |
|
None |
ITEM |
|
5 |
|
OPERATING AND FINANCIAL REVIEW |
|
|
|
|
|
|
AND PROSPECTS |
|
|
|
|
5A |
|
Operating Results |
|
Operating and financial review and prospectsPrincipal industry trends affecting operations; Financial statementsNotes to consolidated financial statementsNote 2, Significant
accounting policies; Financial statementsNotes to consolidated financial statementsNote 36, Risk management |
|
|
5B |
|
Liquidity and Capital Resources |
|
Operating and financial review and prospectsLiquidity and capital resources; Financial statementsNotes to consolidated financial statementsNote 24, Fair value of financial
instruments; Financial statementsNotes to consolidated financial statementsNote 25, Derivative financial instruments; Financial statementsNotes to consolidated financial statementsNote 30, Commitments and contingencies;
Financial statementsNotes to consolidated financial statementsNote 36, Risk management |
|
|
5C |
|
Research and Development, Patents and Licenses |
|
Business overviewNetworks businessResearch and development; Business overviewNetworks business Patents and licenses; Business overviewNokia TechnologiesResearch
and development; Business overviewNokia TechnologiesPatents and licenses; Operating and financial review and prospectsResults of operations; Operating and financial review and prospectsResults of segments; General facts on
Nokia |
|
|
5D |
|
Trends Information |
|
Business overview; Operating and financial review and prospects Principal industry trends affecting operations |
|
|
5E |
|
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements |
|
Operating and financial review and prospectsLiquidity and capital resourcesOff-Balance Sheet Arrangements; Financial statementsNotes to consolidated financial statementsNote
36, Risk management; Financial statementsNotes to consolidated financial statementsNote 30, Commitments and contingencies |
|
|
5F |
|
Tabular Disclosure of Contractual Obligations |
|
Financial statementsNotes to consolidated financial statementsNote 30, Commitments and contingencies |
|
|
5G |
|
Safe Harbor |
|
Forward-looking statements |
ITEM |
|
6 |
|
DIRECTORS, SENIOR MANAGEMENT |
|
|
|
|
|
|
AND EMPLOYEES |
|
|
|
|
6A |
|
Directors and Senior Management |
|
Corporate governanceCorporate governance statement |
|
|
6B |
|
Compensation |
|
Corporate governanceCompensation; Financial statementsNotes to consolidated financial statementsNote 35, Related party transactions |
|
|
6C |
|
Board Practices |
|
Corporate governanceCorporate governance statement; Corporate governanceCompensation Remuneration Report; Financial statementsNotes to consolidated financial
statementsNote 35, Related party transactions |
|
|
6D |
|
Employees |
|
Operating and financial review and prospectsEmployees |
|
|
6E |
|
Share Ownership |
|
Corporate governanceCompensationRemuneration Report; Financial statementsNotes to consolidated financial statementsNote 26,
Share-based payments |
|
|
|
|
|
NOKIA ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 20-F 2016 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Form 20-F
Item Number |
|
Form 20-F Heading |
|
Section in Document |
ITEM |
|
7 |
|
MAJOR SHAREHOLDERS AND RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS |
|
|
|
|
7A |
|
Major Shareholders |
|
General facts on NokiaShares and shareholders |
|
|
7B |
|
Related Party Transactions |
|
General facts on NokiaRelated party transactions, Financial statementsNotes to consolidated financial statementsNote 35, Related party transactions |
|
|
7C |
|
Interests of Experts and Counsel |
|
N/A |
ITEM |
|
8 |
|
FINANCIAL INFORMATION |
|
|
|
|
8A |
|
Consolidated Statements and Other Financial Information |
|
Financial statements; Report of independent registered public accounting firm; Operating and financial review and prospectsDividend |
|
|
8B |
|
Significant Changes |
|
Operating and financial review and prospectsMaterial subsequent events |
ITEM |
|
9 |
|
THE OFFER AND LISTING |
|
|
|
|
9A |
|
Offer and Listing Details |
|
General facts on NokiaShares and shareholders |
|
|
9B |
|
Plan of Distribution |
|
N/A |
|
|
9C |
|
Markets |
|
General facts on NokiaShares and shareholders |
|
|
9D |
|
Selling Shareholders |
|
N/A |
|
|
9E |
|
Dilution |
|
N/A |
|
|
9F |
|
Expenses of the Issue |
|
N/A |
ITEM |
|
10 |
|
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION |
|
|
|
|
10A |
|
Share capital |
|
N/A |
|
|
10B |
|
Memorandum and Articles of Association |
|
General facts on NokiaMemorandum and Articles of Association; Other informationExhibits |
|
|
10C |
|
Material Contracts |
|
General facts on NokiaOur history; Other informationExhibits |
|
|
10D |
|
Exchange Controls |
|
General facts on NokiaControls and proceduresExchange controls |
|
|
10E |
|
Taxation |
|
General facts on NokiaTaxation |
|
|
10F |
|
Dividends and Paying Agents |
|
N/A |
|
|
10G |
|
Statement by Experts |
|
N/A |
|
|
10H |
|
Documents on Display |
|
Other informationInvestor informationDocuments on display |
|
|
10I |
|
Subsidiary Information |
|
N/A |
ITEM |
|
11 |
|
QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK |
|
Financial statementsNotes to consolidated financial statementsNote 36, Risk Management |
ITEM |
|
12 |
|
DESCRIPTION OF SECURITIES OTHER THAN EQUITY SECURITIES |
|
|
|
|
12A |
|
Debt Securities |
|
N/A |
|
|
12B |
|
Warrants and Rights |
|
N/A |
|
|
12C |
|
Other Securities |
|
N/A |
|
|
12D |
|
American Depositary Shares |
|
General facts on NokiaShares and shareholdersDepositary fees and charges; General facts on NokiaShares and shareholdersDepositary
payments for 2015 |
ITEM |
|
13 |
|
DEFAULTS, DIVIDEND ARREARAGES AND DELINQUENCIES |
|
None |
ITEM |
|
14 |
|
MATERIAL MODIFICATIONS TO THE RIGHTS OF SECURITY HOLDERS AND USE OF PROCEEDS |
|
None |
ITEM |
|
15 |
|
CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES |
|
Corporate governanceRegulatory frameworkRisk management, internal control and internal audit functions at Nokia; General facts on
NokiaControls and procedures |
ITEM |
|
16A |
|
AUDIT COMMITTEE FINANCIAL EXPERT |
|
Corporate governanceCorporate governance statementMembers of the Board of Directors Committees of the Board of Directors |
|
|
16B |
|
CODE OF ETHICS |
|
Corporate governanceCorporate governance statementMembers of the Nokia Group Leadership TeamFurther information |
|
|
16C |
|
PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES |
|
Corporate governanceCorporate governance statementAuditor fees and services, Corporate governanceCorporate governance statementAudit Committee pre-approval policies and
procedures |
|
|
16D |
|
EXEMPTIONS FROM THE LISTING STANDARDS FOR AUDIT COMMITTEES |
|
N/A |
|
|
16E |
|
PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES BY THE ISSUER AND AFFILIATED PURCHASERS |
|
General facts on NokiaShares and shareholdersAuthorization to repurchase shares |
|
|
16F |
|
CHANGE IN REGISTRANTS CERTIFYING ACCOUNTANT |
|
None |
|
|
16G |
|
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE |
|
Corporate governanceCorporate governance statementRegulatory framework |
|
|
16H |
|
MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURE |
|
N/A |
ITEM |
|
17 |
|
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS |
|
N/A |
ITEM |
|
18 |
|
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS |
|
Financial Statements |
ITEM |
|
19 |
|
EXHIBITS |
|
Other informationExhibits |
|
NOKIA ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 20-F 2016 |
Forward-looking statements
It should be noted that Nokia and its businesses are exposed to various risks and uncertainties and certain statements
herein that are not historical facts are forward-looking statements, including, without limitation, those regarding:
A) |
our ability to integrate Alcatel Lucent into our operations and achieve the targeted business plans and benefits, including targeted synergies in relation to the Acquisition of Alcatel Lucent; |
B) |
expectations, plans or benefits related to our strategies and growth management; |
C) |
expectations, plans or benefits related to future performance of our businesses; |
D) |
expectations, plans or benefits related to changes in organizational and operational structure; |
E) |
expectations regarding market developments, general economic conditions and structural changes; |
F) |
expectations and targets regarding financial performance, results, operating expenses, taxes, currency exchange rates, hedging, cost savings and competitiveness, as well as results of operations including targeted
synergies and those related to market share, prices, net sales, income and margins; |
G) |
timing of the deliveries of our products and services; |
H) |
expectations and targets regarding collaboration and partnering arrangements, joint ventures or the creation of joint ventures, as well as our expected customer reach; |
I) |
outcome of pending and threatened litigation, arbitration, disputes, regulatory proceedings or investigations by authorities; |
J) |
expectations regarding restructurings, investments, uses of proceeds from transactions, acquisitions and divestments and our ability to achieve the financial and operational targets set in connection with any such
restructurings, investments, divestments and acquisitions; and |
K) |
statements preceded by or including believe, expect, anticipate, foresee, sees, target, estimate, designed,
aim, plans, intends, focus, continue, project, should, will or similar expressions.
|
These statements are based on managements best assumptions and beliefs in light of the information currently
available to it. Because they involve risks and uncertainties, actual results may differ materially from the results that we currently expect. Factors, including risks and uncertainties that could cause these differences include, but are not limited
to:
1) |
our ability to execute our strategy, sustain or improve the operational and financial performance of our business and correctly identify and successfully pursue business opportunities or growth; |
2) |
our ability to achieve the anticipated benefits, synergies, cost savings and efficiencies of the Acquisition of Alcatel Lucent, and our ability to implement our organizational and operational structure efficiently;
|
3) |
general economic and market conditions and other developments in the economies where we operate; |
4) |
competition and our ability to effectively and profitably compete and invest in new competitive high-quality products, services, upgrades and technologies and bring them to market in a timely manner; |
5) |
our dependence on the development of the industries in which we operate, including the cyclicality and variability of the information technology and telecommunications industries; |
6) |
our global business and exposure to regulatory, political or other developments in various countries or regions, including emerging markets and the associated risks in relation to tax matters and exchange controls,
among others; |
7) |
our ability to manage and improve our financial and operating performance, cost savings, competitiveness and synergies after the Acquisition of Alcatel Lucent; |
8) |
our dependence on a limited number of customers and large multi-year agreements; |
9) |
exchange rate fluctuations, as well as hedging activities; |
10) |
Nokia Technologies ability to protect its IPR and to maintain and establish new sources of patent licensing income and IPR-related revenues, particularly in the smartphone market;
|
11) |
our dependence on IPR technologies, including those that we have developed and those that are licensed to us, and the risk of associated IPR-related legal claims, licensing costs and restrictions on use;
|
12) |
our exposure to direct and indirect regulation, including economic or trade policies, and the reliability of our governance, internal controls and compliance processes to prevent regulatory penalties in our business or
in our joint ventures; |
13) |
our ability to identify and remediate material weaknesses in our internal control over financial reporting; |
14) |
our reliance on third-party solutions for data storage and service distribution, which expose us to risks relating to security, regulation and cybersecurity breaches; |
15) |
inefficiencies, breaches, malfunctions or disruptions of information technology systems; |
16) |
Nokia Technologies ability to generate net sales and profitability through licensing of the Nokia brand, particularly in digital media and digital health, and the development and sales of products and services, as
well as other business ventures which may not materialize as planned; |
17) |
our exposure to various legislative frameworks and jurisdictions that regulate fraud and enforce economic trade sanctions and policies, and the possibility of proceedings or investigations that result in fines,
penalties or sanctions; |
18) |
adverse developments with respect to customer financing or extended payment terms we provide to customers; |
19) |
the potential complex tax issues, tax disputes and tax obligations we may face in various jurisdictions, including the risk of obligations to pay additional taxes; |
20) |
our actual or anticipated performance, among other factors, which could reduce our ability to utilize deferred tax assets; |
21) |
our ability to retain, motivate, develop and recruit appropriately skilled employees;
|
|
|
|
|
|
NOKIA ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 20-F 2016 |
22) |
disruptions to our manufacturing, service creation, delivery, logistics and supply chain processes, and the risks related to our geographically-concentrated production sites; |
23) |
the impact of litigation, arbitration, agreement-related disputes or product liability allegations associated with our business; |
24) |
our ability to optimize our capital structure as planned and re-establish our investment grade credit rating or otherwise improve our credit ratings; |
25) |
our ability to achieve targeted benefits from or successfully implement planned transactions, as well as the liabilities related thereto; |
26) |
our involvement in joint ventures and jointly-managed companies; |
27) |
the carrying amount of our goodwill may not be recoverable; |
28) |
uncertainty related to the amount of dividends and equity return we are able to distribute to shareholders for each financial period; |
29) |
pension costs, employee fund-related costs, and healthcare costs; and |
30) |
risks related to undersea infrastructure, as well as in Nokias other filings with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. Other unknown or unpredictable factors or underlying assumptions subsequently proven
to be incorrect could cause actual results to differ materially from those in the forward-looking statements. We do not undertake any obligation to publicly update or revise forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future
events or otherwise, except to the extent legally required. |
Introduction and use of certain terms
Nokia Corporation is a public limited liability company incorporated under the laws of the Republic of Finland. In this annual report on Form 20-F, any reference to
we, us, the Group, the company or Nokia means Nokia Corporation and its consolidated subsidiaries and generally to Nokias Continuing operations, except where we separately specify
that the term means Nokia Corporation or a particular subsidiary or business segment only or our Discontinued operations. References to our shares, matters relating to our shares or matters of corporate governance refer to the shares and
corporate governance of Nokia Corporation.
Nokia Corporation has published its consolidated financial statements in euro for periods beginning on or after
January 1, 1999. In this annual report on Form 20-F, references to EUR, euro or are to the common currency of the
European Economic and Monetary Union, and references to dollars, U.S. dollars, USD or $ are to the currency of the United States. Solely for the convenience of the reader, this annual report on Form
20-F contains conversions of selected euro amounts into U.S. dollars at specified rates or, if not so specified, at the rate of 1.0552 U.S. dollars per euro, which was the noon buying rate in New York City for cable transfers in euro as certified
for customs purposes by the Federal Reserve Bank of New York on December 31, 2016. No representation is made that the amounts have been, could have been or could be converted into U.S. dollars at the rates indicated or at any other rates.
The information contained in, or accessible through, the websites linked throughout this annual report on form 20-F is not incorporated by reference into this document
and should not be considered a part of this document.
Nokia Corporation furnishes Citibank, N.A., as Depositary, with its consolidated financial statements and a related audit
opinion of our independent auditors annually. These financial statements are prepared on the basis of International Financial Reporting Standards as issued by the International Accounting Standards Board and in conformity with IFRS as adopted by the
European Union (IFRS). In accordance with the rules and regulations of the SEC, we do not provide a reconciliation of net income and shareholders equity in our consolidated financial statements to accounting principles generally
accepted in the United States, or U.S. GAAP. We also furnish the Depositary with quarterly reports containing unaudited financial information prepared on the basis of IFRS, as well as all notices of shareholders meetings and other reports and
communications that are made available generally to our shareholders. The Depositary makes these notices, reports and communications available for inspection by record holders of American Depositary Receipts (ADRs), evidencing American
Depositary Shares (ADSs), and distributes to all record holders of ADRs notices of shareholders meetings received by the Depositary.
In addition
to the materials delivered to holders of ADRs by the Depositary, holders can access our consolidated financial statements, and other information included in our annual reports and proxy materials, at nokia.com/financials. This annual report on Form
20-F is also available at nokia.com/ financials as well as on Citibanks website at http://citibank.ar.wilink.com (enter Nokia in the Company Name Search). Holders may also request a hard copy of this annual report by calling the
toll-free number 1-877-NOKIA-ADR (1-877-665-4223), or by directing a written request to Citibank, N.A., Shareholder Services, PO Box 43077, Providence, RI 02940-3081, United States. With each annual distribution of our proxy materials, we offer our
record holders of ADRs the option of receiving all of these documents electronically in the future.
|
|
|
NOKIA ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 20-F 2016 |
|
|
|
|
|
NOKIA ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 20-F 2016 |
|
01 |
This is Nokia
We create the technology to connect the world. Powered by
the research and innovation of Nokia Bell Labs, we serve communications service providers, governments, large enterprises and consumers with the industrys most complete end-to-end portfolio of products, services and licensing. From the
enabling infrastructure for 5G and the Internet of Things (IoT) to emerging applications in Virtual Reality (VR) and digital health, we are shaping the future of technology to transform the human experience.
Since the closing of the Alcatel Lucent acquisition in early January 2016 (the Acquisition of Alcatel
Lucent), we have combined global leadership in mobile and fixed network infrastructure with the software, services and advanced technologies to serve customers in more than 100 countries around the world. We are driving the transition to
smart, virtual networks and connectivity by creating one single network for all services, converging mobile and fixed broadband, IP routing and optical networks, with the software and services to manage them. Our research scientists and engineers
continue to invent new technologies that will increasingly transform the way people and things communicate and connect: 5G, ultra broadband access, IP and Software Defined Networking (SDN), Cloud applications, IoT and security platforms,
data analytics, as well as sensors and imaging.
Through our five business groups, we have a global presence with operations in Europe, the Middle East & Africa,
Greater China, North America, Asia-Pacific and Latin America. In 2016, we had sales in approximately 130 countries. We also have research and development (R&D) facilities in Europe, North America and Asia, and at the end of 2016, we
employed approximately 101 000 people.
We closed 2016 delivering net sales of EUR 23.6 billion. We continued to make significant targeted R&D investments, a
bedrock of our success in innovation, with R&D expenditures equaling EUR 4.9 billion in 2016.
|
Countries of
operation |
100+ |
Number of employees
at the end of 2016 |
~101 000 |
R&D investment
in 2016 |
EUR 4.9bn |
|
|
|
02 |
|
NOKIA ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 20-F 2016 |
Acquisition of Alcatel Lucent
In April 2015, we announced plans to acquire Alcatel Lucent with an aim to create an innovation leader in next generation technology and services. The all-share
transaction was agreed on the basis of 0.55 new Nokia shares for every Alcatel Lucent share, a transaction valued at EUR 15.6 billion on a fully diluted basis.
At
the end of 2015, our shareholders voted overwhelmingly to approve the Alcatel Lucent acquisition, and in early January 2016 we announced that we had gained control of Alcatel Lucent through the successful public exchange offer for all outstanding
Alcatel Lucent securities by holding nearly 80% of outstanding Alcatel Lucent securities.
During the course of the year, we continued to take steps towards gaining full ownership of Alcatel Lucent through the
initial and reopened exchange offers and by purchasing Alcatel Lucent shares and OCEANE convertible bonds in privately negotiated transactions, consequently reaching full ownership of Alcatel Lucent in November 2016.
On October 4, 2016, the French stock market authority (Autorité des marchés financiers, the AMF) announced that a legal action was filed
before the Paris Court of Appeal on September 30, 2016 for annulment of the AMFs clearance decision regarding our public buy-out offer, which would be followed by a squeeze-out of all remaining securities of Alcatel Lucent. As a result,
the public buy-out offer period was extended and the squeeze-out was postponed. We found the legal challenge to be without merit, as we believed that the offer complied with all applicable laws and regulations.
On October 25, 2016, with the legal challenge still pending, the AMF announced the continuation of the timetable of
the public buy-out offer followed by a squeeze-out of all remaining securities of Alcatel Lucent, allowing the public buy-out period to end on October 31, 2016 and the squeeze-out to be implemented on November 2, 2016. On November 2,
2016, we achieved 100% ownership of Alcatel Lucent.
On December 15, 2016, the plaintiffs withdrew the complaint they had filed before the Paris Court of
Appeal and, consequently, the public buy-out offer followed by a squeeze-out had therefore become definitive, confirming our ownership of 100% of Alcatel Lucent.
|
|
|
NOKIA ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 20-F 2016 |
|
03 |
This is Nokia continued
Organizational structure and reportable segments
January 14, 2016 was Nokia and Alcatel Lucents first day of combined operations.
After the Acquisition of Alcatel Lucent, we organized our networks-oriented businesses into four business groups: Mobile Networks, Fixed Networks, IP/Optical Networks
and Applications & Analytics (together the Networks business); and kept our driver of future innovation and licensing, Nokia Technologies, as a separate fifth business group. For descriptions of our business groups, refer to
Business overviewNetworks business and Business overviewNokia Technologies.
We have three reportable segments: (i) Ultra
Broadband Networks comprising Mobile Networks and Fixed Networks, (ii) IP Networks and Applications comprising IP/Optical Networks and Applications & Analytics (all within our Networks business), and (iii) Nokia Technologies.
Following the changes to our organizational structure announced on March 17, 2017, we will continue to report
financial information for Ultra Broadband Networks, IP Networks and Applications and Nokia Technologies. Ultra Broadband Networks will be composed of the Mobile Networks, Global Services and Fixed Networks business groups. IP Networks and
Applications is composed of the IP/Optical Networks and Applications & Analytics business groups.
Additionally, we report the results of other business
activities that are not reportable segments, such as our undersea cables business, Alcatel-Lucent Submarine Networks (ASN), and our antenna systems business, Radio Frequency Systems (RFS), in aggregate. Both ASN and RFS are
being managed as separate businesses.
|
|
|
04 |
|
NOKIA ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 20-F 2016 |
|
|
|
NOKIA ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 20-F 2016 |
|
05 |
Key data
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales
2016 |
|
Gross margin
2016 |
|
|
EUR 23.6bn |
|
35.8% |
|
|
Dividend per share
2016 |
|
Net cash as of
December 31, 2016 |
|
|
EUR 0.17 |
|
EUR 5.3bn |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following table sets forth
summary financial and non-financial
information for the years ended
December 31, 2016 (including Alcatel Lucent) and December 31, 2015 for our Continuing operations. This data
has been derived from our
consolidated financial statements,
which are included in this annual
report on Form 20-F. |
|
For the year ended December 31 |
|
2016
EURm |
|
|
2015
EURm |
|
|
Change |
|
|
Net sales |
|
|
23 614 |
|
|
|
12 499 |
|
|
|
89% |
|
|
Nokias Networks business |
|
|
21 800 |
|
|
|
11 487 |
|
|
|
90% |
|
|
Ultra Broadband Networks |
|
|
15 771 |
|
|
|
10 159 |
|
|
|
55% |
|
|
IP Networks and Applications |
|
|
6 029 |
|
|
|
1 328 |
|
|
|
354% |
|
|
Nokia Technologies |
|
|
1 053 |
|
|
|
1 027 |
|
|
|
3% |
|
|
Group Common and Other |
|
|
1 145 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross margin |
|
|
35.8% |
|
|
|
44.3% |
|
|
|
(850)bps |
|
|
Operating (loss)/profit |
|
|
(1 100 |
) |
|
|
1 697 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nokias Networks business |
|
|
1 935 |
|
|
|
1 349 |
|
|
|
43% |
|
|
Ultra Broadband Networks |
|
|
1 362 |
|
|
|
1 211 |
|
|
|
12% |
|
|
IP Networks and Applications |
|
|
573 |
|
|
|
138 |
|
|
|
315% |
|
|
Nokia Technologies |
|
|
579 |
|
|
|
698 |
|
|
|
(17)% |
|
|
Group Common and Other |
|
|
(342 |
) |
|
|
(89 |
) |
|
|
284% |
|
|
Unallocated items(1) |
|
|
(3 272 |
) |
|
|
(261 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
Operating margin |
|
|
(4.7)% |
|
|
|
13.6% |
|
|
|
(1 830)bps |
|
|
Financial income and expenses, net |
|
|
(287 |
) |
|
|
(186 |
) |
|
|
54% |
|
|
Income tax benefit/(expense) |
|
|
457 |
|
|
|
(346 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
(Loss)/profit |
|
|
(912 |
) |
|
|
1 194 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings per share (EPS), EUR diluted |
|
|
(0.13 |
) |
|
|
0.31 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average number of employees |
|
|
102 687 |
|
|
|
56 690 |
|
|
|
81% |
|
|
|
Net sales by region |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asia-Pacific |
|
|
4 206 |
|
|
|
3 230 |
|
|
|
30% |
|
|
|
Europe |
|
|
6 393 |
|
|
|
3 813 |
|
|
|
68% |
|
|
|
Greater China |
|
|
2 656 |
|
|
|
1 712 |
|
|
|
55% |
|
|
|
Latin America |
|
|
1 457 |
|
|
|
973 |
|
|
|
50% |
|
|
|
Middle East & Africa |
|
|
1 871 |
|
|
|
1 177 |
|
|
|
59% |
|
|
|
North America |
|
|
7 031 |
|
|
|
1 594 |
|
|
|
341% |
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
23 614 |
|
|
|
12 499 |
|
|
|
89% |
|
|
|
(1) Includes
costs related to the Acquisition of Alcatel Lucent and related integration, goodwill impairment charges, intangible asset amortization and other purchase price fair value adjustments, restructuring and associated charges and certain other
items. |
|
|
|
|
06 |
|
NOKIA ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 20-F 2016 |
(1) |
We also paid a special dividend of EUR 0.10 per share in line with our capital structure optimization program announced on October 29, 2015. |
(2) |
All Nokia Technologies IPR and licensing net sales are allocated to Finland. |
Year-on-year change is in parentheses.
Derived from our financial statements which were prepared in accordance with IFRS.
|
|
|
NOKIA ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 20-F 2016 |
|
07 |
|
|
|
08 |
|
NOKIA ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 20-F 2016 |
|
|
|
NOKIA ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 20-F 2016 |
|
09 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
NOKIA ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 20-F 2016 |
|
|
|
NOKIA ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 20-F 2016 |
|
11 |
Letter from our
President and CEO
|
|
|
|
|
Net Sales in
2016 EUR 23.6bn
Proposed dividend per share
EUR 0.17
Proposed dividends
EUR 972m |
2016 was a year of remarkable change for Nokia.
We started the year primarily as a mobile networks and patent licensing company. Today we are a fundamentally different company, with a complete portfolio that spans
mobile, fixed, cable, routing, optical, standalone software, services, digital health, and VR, as well as licensing activities covering patents, brand, technology, and more.
During this transformation, we delivered solid financial performance, made significant progress integrating Alcatel Lucent, launched compelling innovations for our
customers, moved forward with the execution of our strategy, and are on track to meet our commitment to reduce costs by EUR 1.2 billion in full year 2018.
Financial highlights
In the context of a challenging market and a major integration effort, we performed well in 2016. Our Networks
business delivered an operating margin of 8.9% in 2016, and Nokia Technologies net sales increased by 3% to EUR 1.1 billion in 2016. While overall sales were down compared to sales of both Nokia and Alcatel Lucent in 2015, profitability held
up well. Because of this strong performance, our Board of Directors will propose an increased dividend compared to 2015 and compared to our original capital structure optimization plans.
Integration progress
Despite having only closed the
Acquisition of Alcatel Lucent in early January 2016 and gained 100% ownership on November 2,
2016, we have completed the majority of our integration projects. While we have agreed product transition plans with all
major customers, execution of those programs will take further time. That said, the speed of progress and quality of work have been considerably higher than I have witnessed in past integrations.
Customers
Customers have responded extremely well to
the scope of our new end-to-end portfolio. It has increased our credibility with major communication services providers (CSPs), who understand that network performance is based not just on the parts of the networks but on how those parts
work together. It has also opened doors for us to new customers in select enterprise segments, who increasingly need the kind of mission-critical networking capability that we provide. In addition, we have successfully agreed product transition
plans with all major customers, and implementation is underway in many. This is a remarkable achievement, completed in well under one year.
People
Overall employee engagement scores at Nokia
remained high, based on our periodic Cultural Cohesion Tracker. The tracker also pointed to the fact that the Acquisition of Alcatel Lucent created less cultural conflict than might have been expected given the history of acquisitions in our sector.
During the year, we also launched a revitalized effort to improve our gender balance within the company. I am confident that we are gaining momentum and within the next two years we will start to see some positive change.
Innovation
We made significant progress in our aspiration to lead in 5G as we began bringing to market innovation from nearly 10 years of research at Nokia Bell Labs. We are
preparing the world for 5G with the industrys best evolutionary path from 4G to 4.5G to 4.5G Pro to 4.9G and finally 5G.
We set records for fiber-like speeds
over copper with XG-Fast, delivering 8 gigabits per second in a test with Australias National Broadband Network. Our new optical chip sets enabled us to deliver a transmission speed of 1.2 terabits per second over optical fiber in
Africas first field trial of optical communications technology. In New Zealand, we delivered 200 gigabits per second on a single wavelength over a single fiber.
We introduced our intelligent management platform for all connected things (IMPACT) to help our customers deploy new services for IoT applications. Our
Nuage SDN platform gained traction helping businesses move to the Cloud, and we continued our development of Cloud service orchestration and network security.
Nokia Bell Labs moved forward with its Future X projects, shaping the network of the futuremassively distributed, cognitive, continuously adaptive, learning and
optimizing.
Sustainability and corporate responsibility
Reducing our carbon footprint and helping our customers do the same is at the center of our sustainability objectives, as is doing business with integrity. The high
standards of our Code
|
|
|
12 |
|
NOKIA ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 20-F 2016 |
|
|
|
|
|
of Conduct allow us to build and maintain personal integrity across the company and protect our reputation. We work hard to ensure the
technology we provide is not used to infringe human rights and conduct robust on-site assessments of our suppliers, as well as using the EcoVadis scorecards, to ensure they meet our high ethical standards. Our customers also use these very same
scorecards to assess our sustainability performance. In 2016, we made progress in the EcoVadis
framework in areas of environment, labor practices, and supply chain management. We were judged Outstanding, the highest gold recognition level, with a score of 85/100 putting us in the top 1% of all suppliers assessed. Our total energy
consumption across our facilities decreased by approximately 9% compared to 2015, which reflected a decrease of approximately 16% in our greenhouse gas emissions, including our renewable energy usage. The 2016 figures are compared to the combined
figures of Nokia and Alcatel Lucent in 2015. In 2016, we retained our listing in the Dow Jones Sustainability Index with a score of 83/100, and were ranked the leader of the CMT Communications Equipment sector.
Cost reductions
With the Acquisition of Alcatel Lucent, we committed to reduce costs by EUR 1.2 billion in full
year 2018. We are progressing well towards this goal and, in 2016, we were ahead of plan. I would note that delivering against this commitment has required and will require us to reduce the number of employees as we eliminate overlaps and use best
practices from both Nokia and Alcatel Lucent to find new areas of efficiencies. These reductions are never easy and do not reflect the quality of the people who had to leave the company. Throughout the process, which will continue until the end of
2018, we have sought to provide support for those people and to treat them with dignity and respect.
Strategy
Finally, we announced our new strategy and made good progress on execution against four strategic priorities.
Our first strategic priority is to lead in high-performance end-to-end networks with our
communication service provider customers. We ended the year with a leading position in LTE, service provider IP edge routing, copper access and services.
To maintain these leadership positions, we launched compelling 4.5G Pro and 4.9G solutions, giving operators the ability to continue to meet capacity demands now
while |
|
The operational foundation we now have in place, together with our financial strength and our disciplined,
results-focused culture, have put us in a much stronger position to capitalize on our bigger portfolio and customer set, to tap the greater number of paths available to us for growth and expansion, and to be the innovation leader that enables our
connected lives. |
|
transitioning to 5G in the future. We acquired Gainspeed, giving us a compelling entry into the DOCSIS (Data Over Cable Service Interface
Specification) world of cable operators. We also made several other acquisitions designed to expand our capabilities in areas such as big data analytics for network and service automation and network security.
Our second priority is to expand network sales to select vertical markets, specifically energy,
transportation, public sector, technical extra-large enterprises (TXLEs), and webscale players (Webscales) such as Google and Amazon. We saw good momentum in the year in several of these areas, such as building an LTE public
safety network in Dubai with our partner Nedaa, IP backbone and network modernization for rail operators such as the S-Bahn in Berlin, and private LTE networks for utilities and mining with major players like Rio Tinto. We see strong future
opportunities in all targeted segments. To tap this opportunity, we are investing where it is
needed, including focusing our sales force, and making strategic acquisitions such as Deepfield, a United States-based leader in big data analytics to extend our reach into webscale and large enterprise customers.
Building a strong standalone software business is our third strategic priority, and in 2016 we made
good progress, expanding our current business with communication service providers and expanding to enterprises and IoT platforms. We enhanced our IMPACT platform to help our customers deploy new services and lines of business, such as smart
parking, smart lighting, and transportation and automotive. Our planned acquisition of Comptel accelerates our plans for a standalone software business. Comptels service orchestration portfolio, when combined with Nokias Service
Assurance and our Cloudband and Nuage portfolios, enables |
|
us to provide our customers with complete end-to-end orchestration of complex Network Function Virtualization (NFV) and SDN
deployments. Finally, our fourth strategic pillarto create new business and licensing
opportunities in the consumer ecosystemgained strong momentum. Our patent licensing business has also progressed, adding more licensees as well as concluding our arbitration and agreeing an expanded licensing deal with Samsung. We also entered
into a brand licensing agreement with HMD Global, which has already launched its first Nokia-branded smartphones. We accelerated our Digital Health business with the acquisition of Withings, and continued to gain momentum in OZO camera sales and in
taking steps to see our VR video and audio become embedded in the VR ecosystem. Our primary interest in this area continues to be in developing technology that we can license to other parties and in refreshing our patent portfolio.
These are truly exciting times at Nokia. We came a long way in 2016 and have plenty of
opportunities in our future. Even if our business has changed massively, our culture remains
uniquely Nokia. We are driven to win, focused on shareholder value, but always guided by our strong core values and deep commitment to ethics and integrity. We remain true to our vision to expand the human possibilities of the connected world,
creating new and extraordinary experiences in peoples lives through technology that is grounded in real human needs. To that purpose we are dedicated, ready, and ideally placed to succeed.
Rajeev Suri
President and CEO |
|
|
|
NOKIA ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 20-F 2016 |
|
13 |
Our role as a global
technology leader
Our vision is to enable the human
possibilities of the connected world.
We are innovators of the global nervous system, shaping the future of technology to transform the
human experience
Innovating this global nervous system is a role that Nokia is uniquely well placed to play. Our business today is not just focused on
meeting extraordinary technological demands, but also on how technology is deployed and used. With the potential of Augmented Intelligence, increasing human and machine interaction, and a supercomputer in every pocket, we believe that current trends
will have significant implications for society.
We are shaping a new revolution in technology
We are shaping a new revolution in technology, where intelligent networks augment and aid our daily lives through sensing the world around us and providing the data and
analytics needed to make choices that help society thrive. We are innovating this global nervous system with effortless, simple and dependable technology for the IoT, ultra-broadband, Cloud, IP interconnectivity, digital health and immersive VR
technologies.
We enable innovative and compelling business models, applications and services
With the advent of new technologies such as the IoT, 5G and Cloud, we believe that enabling new business opportunities for our customers is the key to their rapid
transition to new digital networks, capitalizing on the inherent operational benefits of this technology, and generating new services.
We assist our customers in
identifying compelling cases for new revenue streams, in addition to enabling the rapid onboarding of new applications and services, scalability and operational efficiency.
We optimize performance to maximize value and customer satisfaction
We believe that agility in todays fast and constantly evolving marketplace is no longer just an advantageit is a vital necessity. Agile principles, lean
practices and innovative tools are required to successfully survive in the new digital world and enable continuous improvement in quality, value and customer satisfaction.
We enable our customers to move away from an economy-of-scale network operating model to demand-driven operations. We do this by providing the easy programmability and
flexible automation needed to support dynamic operations, reduce complexity and improve efficiency.
As a result, our customers can fulfill end user
demandswhen and where they are neededby provisioning services in real time while automatically making optimal use of networks assets.
We create disruptive solutions enabling market differentiation and competitive advantage
We believe that innovation is the foundation of everything we do at Nokia. We force the pace of change by pushing technology boundaries, challenging the status quo and
working in open collaboration with customers and partners on the next big idea. It is through these efforts that Nokia expands and enhances its portfolio, introduces disruptive technologies and identifies new market opportunities for its
customers.
We are continually evolving the Nokia portfolio: adding and combining functionality, making it more intuitive and simpler to use. Doing this helps our
customers evolve their networks. For instance, by taking the first step towards entering the IoT space with our IMPACT solution; or the next step to transition from LTE to 5G using 4.5G Pro and 4.9G; or perhaps the ultimate step to creating
immersive experiences with our OZO VR camera.
It is through innovation that we create paths for our customerswhatever their starting pointto reach the
promising new digital world.
|
|
|
14 |
|
NOKIA ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 20-F 2016 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Our values |
|
|
We foster a culture of high performance and high integrity, guided by our vision, brand and values.
It is through our people and culture that we shape technology to serve human needs. Our pursuit of performance with integrity and sustainabilitya culture that
stems from our Finnish rootsis key to why our customers and partners choose to work with us.
Operational excellence is the cultural platform we use to pursue
Nokias core purpose as a company. It means relentlessly pursuing financial performance by delivering on our end-to-end strategy. It informs our quest for innovation, as we use our insatiable curiosity and deep technical knowledge to share the
future for our customers. It also drives our pursuit of continuous improvement, not only over earlier performance, but also in our ability to outperform competitors and be a trusted partner for customers, partners and suppliers.
We pursue high performance, always under the guiding principles of our values:
Respect
Acting with uncompromising integrity, we work openly and collaboratively, seeking to earn respect from others.
Challenge
We are never complacent, ask tough
questions, and push for higher performance to deliver the right results.
Achievement
We take responsibility, and are accountable for driving quality, setting high standards, and striving for continuous improvement.
Renewal
We constantly refine our skills, learn
and embrace new ways of doing things, and adapt to the world around us.
Our commitments
What we do to design and deploy technology in the service of people
We create the most sophisticated technology that is effortless and intuitive to use
We lead the relentless quest for gains in performance and agility, with technology that thinks for itself.
We solve your future needs
We help customers shape their futures based on a clear view of technology opportunities and constraints. We work closely with
customers and partners to anticipate their priorities and guide their choices.
We obsess about integrity,
quality, and security
We never compromise our values in the drive for business or technical
performance. We pursue quality in all our products and processes, and design for security and privacy from the start.
|
|
|
NOKIA ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 20-F 2016 |
|
15 |
|
|
|
16 |
|
NOKIA ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 20-F 2016 |
We are rebalancing for growth, putting
Nokia at the heart of unprecedented
technology demands as innovators
of the global nervous system.
The vision of the Programmable World continues to guide our corporate strategy. We have identified six global megatrends
that drive the Programmable World. These megatrends create massive technological requirements, impact our current and potential customers, change the lives of people and impact business operations on a global scale and ultimately provide
opportunities for Nokia to diversify into new growth areas.
The megatrends we have identified are:
1. |
Network, compute and storage: Ever present broadband capacity coupled with a distributed Cloud for ubiquitous compute and near infinite storage, allowing limitless connectivity and imperceptible latency
|
2. |
Internet of Things: In addition to people, trillions of things are connected to the internet, collecting unprecedented amounts of data in a private and business context |
3. |
Augmented Intelligence: New tools transform the collected data into actionable insights, fundamentally changing the way decisions are made by businesses, governments and individuals, resulting in time savings,
less waste, higher efficiency and new business models |
4. |
Human and machine interaction: A range of new form factors that fundamentally transform the way humans interact with each other and with machines, e.g. voice-based digital assistance, gesture control, smart
clothes, implantable chips, robotics and Augmented and Virtual Reality
|
5. |
Social and trust economics: Ubiquitous connectivity, compute and storage, as well as technologies such as block chain, enabling new business models based on sharing assets and distributed trust, allowing rapid
scalability on a global level |
6. |
Digitization and ecosystems: Next level of digitization beyond content and information, digitizing atoms with additive printing in an industrial, consumer and medical context, fundamentally transforming
production processes |
These megatrends are driving massive new technology requirements, and end-to-end networks are a central enabler for all
aforementioned megatrends, which create a multitude of opportunities for us. Nokia Bell Labs has developed a vision of a future network architecture that fulfills all of these requirements in a holistic waythe Future X network vision. This is
our guide not just to how things will change, but also to what we need to do to meet the future needs of our customers and to address these megatrends. The Future X vision encompasses the key domains of future networks: massive scale access,
converged edge cloud, smart network fabric, universal adaptive core, programmable network operating systems, augmented cognition systems, digital value platforms and dynamic data security.
Simultaneously, driven by the identified megatrends and the increasing relevance of networks, we are seeing a shift in
who is investing in technology. Our primary market, comprised of CSPs, in which we have a leadership position, is expected to remain challenging with a limited estimated growth opportunity over the next five years. However, the megatrends are
increasing the demand for large high-performance networks in other key areas, which we define as our select vertical markets. Webscale companiessuch as Google, Microsoft, and Alibabaare investing in Cloud technology and network
infrastructure on an increasing scale. As other vertical markets such as energy, transportation and government digitize their operations, they will need massive mission-critical networks. The same is true for TXLEstechnically sophisticated
companies, such as banks, that invest heavily in their own network infrastructures to gain a key competitive advantage. Consequently, we have identified attractive growth opportunities in new domains outside our primary market with CSPs, which
remains a significant market.
We are addressing both our primary CSP market and the newly identified growth opportunities in our adjacent market with our
Rebalancing for Growth strategy. This strategy builds on our core strength of delivering large high-performance networks by methodically expanding our business into targeted, higher-growth and higher-margin vertical markets. Our ambition
is to grow the share of our revenue that is derived from outside the CSPs.
|
|
|
NOKIA ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 20-F 2016 |
|
17 |
Our strategy continued
Our four pillars
This strategy builds on our business
portfolio and continued drive to design
technology that serves people and
includes the following four key priorities:
Lead in high-performance, end-to-end networks with CSPs
Nokia is a leader in this area today and we will use our main competitive advantagea near 100% end-to-end portfolio
that we can deliver on a global scaleto maintain our leadership while managing for profitability. Within this first priority, we are focused on:
∎ |
|
monetizing additional waves of 4G and establishing leadership in 5G by being first to market with key customers and global technology leadership;
|
∎ |
|
maintaining our leading market share in copper access, accelerating momentum in fiber access, successfully entering the cable market, and developing new smart home solutions; |
∎ |
|
leveraging our superior products to expand in both edge and core routing, where we have a fully virtualized portfolio that is differentiated by performance, flexibility, and quality;
|
∎ |
|
using our unique capability of offering optical and routing that work together, a capability that is increasingly becoming a customer requirement; and |
∎ |
|
delivering cost savings by realizing synergies and applying best practices across our entire portfolio to maintain the industrys most profitable networks business.
|
|
|
|
18 |
|
NOKIA ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 20-F 2016 |
|
|
|
|
|
Over the next two years, we intend to maintain our leading position with CSPs, while establishing ourselves as a credible and recognized player in our target vertical markets among enterprises. We strive to
sustain and rebuild Nokia as a value-adding consumer brand, earning returns through both our own businesses and licensing. |
Expand network sales to select vertical markets
We will expand into five select vertical markets with carrier-grade needs: energy, transportation, public sector, TXLEs
and Webscales. As the world becomes ever more digital, the kind of massive, high-performance networks once used almost exclusively in telecommunications are now needed by other organizations. Webscale customers will increasingly require
high-performance networks to improve customer experiences and to expand their primary business models.
∎ |
|
For Webscale companies we have identified two areas for diversification: |
|
|
|
all-IP-led, with a focus on providing more IP routing and optical network infrastructure; and |
|
|
|
mobile access-led, targeted at those Webscales that wish to expand into mobile access connectivity with consumers.
|
∎ |
|
In terms of select vertical markets, we have a three-pronged approach: |
|
|
|
target a limited number of customer segments to ensure focus; |
|
|
|
leverage our full end-to-end portfolio to increase penetration with customers; and |
|
|
|
accelerate and diversify our go-to-market. |
|
|
|
NOKIA ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 20-F 2016 |
|
19 |
Our strategy continued
Our four pillars
Build a strong standalone software business
While Nokia has a large software business today, much of that is attached to our hardware products. Our ambition is to
move beyond that approach in the medium term and ultimately to create a large global software player that has the margin profile consistent with large software companies. We have three priorities to achieve this ambition:
∎ |
|
generate an uplift to our business by selling software assets we have today because our software is largely network-agnostic. Fixed, cable and enterprise customers are targets for expansion; |
∎ |
|
market our current software to select vertical markets. Some of our software assets today are highly relevant for our select vertical markets. For example, Webscales can benefit from Nokias Operations Support
Systems, Service Assurance to enable high-performance IT networks, and inter-data center connections; and
|
∎ |
|
assess where we are able to expand into enterprise software and IoT platforms, where our experience in providing mission-critical networks and services at scale is a powerful differentiator.
|
|
|
|
20 |
|
NOKIA ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 20-F 2016 |
Create new business and licensing opportunities in the consumer ecosystem
In addition to renewing existing patent licenses on favorable terms, our aim is to add new licensees from the mobile
industry, and we continue to expand patent licensing into new segments, such as automotive and consumer electronics. Our brand licensing efforts are well underwaywe see value creation opportunities in the mobile devices industry leveraging our
strong brand. Our exclusive brand licensee for mobile phones and tablets, HMD Global, has already launched new Nokia branded feature phones and smartphones.
In addition to our licensing businesses, we intend to return to the consumer market with two select new businesses
in Digital Media and Digital Health. Our current focus in the fast-growing area of VR is to expand the range of OZO cameras as part of creating an industry-leading VR ecosystem. Technology licensing and strategic partnerships will form an
essential element of this work, in order to accelerate VR content creation and mass adoption.
In Digital Health, we entered the market through our acquisition of Withings, a pioneer in consumer-focused
connected health devices. In the future, we see opportunities to scale globally by building on the powerful reach of the Nokia brand, expanding into corporate wellness and assessing opportunities to transition into business-to-business healthcare,
in areas such as connected patient care.
|
|
|
NOKIA ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 20-F 2016 |
|
21 |
Our leadership
We have a strong and experienced leadership
team that brings together leaders with many
years of experience in telecommunications
and technology, finance, sales and operations,
as well as various other business disciplines.
The diversity of business backgrounds of the Nokia Group Leadership Team (the Group Leadership
Team) members has been integral to the transformation of Nokia into an industry and innovation leader in next-generation technology and services in recent years.
The Group Leadership Team is responsible for the operative management of Nokia, including decisions concerning our
strategy and the overall business portfolio. The Chair and members of the Group Leadership Team are appointed by the Board. The Group Leadership Team is chaired by the President and Chief Executive Officer (the President and CEO).
(1) |
As announced on March 17, 2017, Mr. Elhage will continue as a member of the Group Leadership Team until April 1, 2017. |
|
|
|
22 |
|
NOKIA ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 20-F 2016 |
+ |
On March 17, 2017, we announced a change in our organizational structure which also impacted our Group Leadership Team effective from April 1, 2017. Refer to pages 98 to 101 for the
updated composition of the Group Leadership Team and full biographies of its members. |
(2) |
As announced on March 17, 2017, Mr. Rouanne will transition to his new role as president of Mobile Networks effective from April 1, 2017. |
|
|
|
NOKIA ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 20-F 2016 |
|
23 |
Our businesses
We have two businesses: Nokias Networks
business and Nokia Technologies.
Within these two businesses, we had five
business groups in 2016: Mobile Networks(1),
Fixed Networks,
IP/Optical Networks, and
Applications & Analytics (all within our
Networks business); and Nokia Technologies.
This section presents an overview of Nokias
Networks business and Nokia Technologies.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Networks business |
|
|
|
|
|
Nokia Technologies |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mobile Networks
|
|
|
|
Fixed Networks |
|
|
|
Nokia
Technologies |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Applications &
Analytics
|
|
|
|
IP/Optical Networks |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
Following the changes to our organizational structure announced on March 17, 2017, our current Mobile Networks business group will be separated into two distinct, but closely linked, organizations effective from
April 1, 2017: (1) Mobile Networks, which will focus on products and solutions, and (2) Global Services which will focus on services. These changes are not reflected in the presentation of our businesses below, which reflect our
organizational structure for the year ended December 31, 2016.
|
|
|
|
24 |
|
NOKIA ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 20-F 2016 |
|
|
|
NOKIA ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 20-F 2016 |
|
25 |
Networks business
|
|
|
Our Networks business in 2016 was conducted through its four business groups: Mobile Networks, Fixed Networks, IP/Optical Networks, and Applications & Analytics. |
|
|
Market overview
Through our comprehensive end-to-end portfolio of products and services, we are addressing a market that encompasses mobile and fixed network access infrastructure, IP
routing and optical networks as well as software platforms and applications.
We define our primary market as a network and IP infrastructure, software and
related services market for CSPs. We estimate that our primary market was EUR 113 billion in 2016. In addition, we have an adjacent market, including a vertical market that includes our Networks businesses expansion areas in both a customer and
product dimension. The adjacent market includes customer segments such as Webscales, energy, transport, public sector and TXLEs. In the product dimension, this includes solutions like Nuage Networks, SDN, Analytics, IoT and Security. The
adjacent market was estimated at EUR 18 billion in 2016.
Demand for our portfolio is driven by exponentially increasing growth in data traffic as peoples lives and
enterprises become ever more digitized. This drives the demand for highly reliable networks for
massive connectivity.
Competition
The competitors in our primary market are Huawei and Ericsson. We also compete with technology experts in some of our other market segments, such as Juniper and Cisco
in the routing segment, and Ciena, Adtran, and Calix in the optical networks and fixed access segments. Both the optical networks and the applications and analytics market segments are still highly fragmented markets.
|
|
|
26 |
|
NOKIA ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 20-F 2016 |
Market overview
The primary market for our Mobile Networks business group includes technologies for mobile access, converged core and microwave transport as well as related services.
This encompasses access and core technologies ranging from 2G to 5G licensed spectrum for both macro and small cell deployments. The services market includes implementation, care and professional services for mobile networks in addition to
managed services for both mobile and fixed networks. The primary market for Mobile Networks was estimated at EUR 64 billion in 2016.
The vertical market for
Mobile Networks includes solutions for the public sector, TXLEs and Webscales, and drives expansion into domains such as IoT connectivity, LTE for public safety, private LTE and unlicensed radio access. The vertical market, including
verticals, was estimated at EUR 2 billion in 2016.
Business overview and organization
Our aim is to lead with traditional telecommunications operators, as well as expand into select attractive, vertical segments. This is accomplished by delivering
a comprehensive end-to-end portfolio of mobile products and services across Radio Networks, Converged Core, Advanced Mobile Networks Solutions and Global Services businesses.
Radio Networks has the task of driving leadership in radio access and specifically has end-to-end responsibility for one
of the most important areas for Nokias future: 5G. We believe that 5G will change the way in which mobile technology is used in virtually every sphere of life. As we move along the path towards making 5G a commercial reality, we aim to extend
our leadership in LTE with a smooth evolution path comprising successive generations of 4.5G, 4.5G Pro and 4.9G offerings. Mobile Networks rationalized portfolio, featuring the 5G-ready AirScale radio access, is setting the standard for
scalability, openness, energy efficiency and multitechnology support (Single RAN). AirScale is the platform to enable 4.5G Pro/4.9G, Cloud and IoT connectivity.
The further evolution of 4G, and ultimately 5G, requires a continuous transformation of the core network. Mobile Networks Converged Core is designing a
radically simplified, robust and scalable core network based on its concept of a Cloud Native Core. Mobile Networks is already executing on this path and distinguishing its offer through its superior Shared Data Layer and AirFrame data center
infrastructure solutions, which enable a Telco Cloud architecture that combines the best of both a centralized and a distributed approach. Using truly open interfaces and open source software building blocks, Mobile Networks can provide
excellent performance for its customers in and beyond traditional telecommunications operators. Mobile Networks aims for a leading market position in end-to-end IP multimedia subsystem (IMS)/voice over LTE (VoLTE),
subscriber data management and other virtualized software infrastructure solutions, putting together the key building blocks which will enable new digital business models.
Advanced Mobile Networks Solutions spearheads Mobile Networks expansion beyond traditional telecommunications
operators to vertical markets in public safety; connectivity for IoT and connected automotive; and private LTE networks for, for example, transportation and energy companies. With a leading small cells portfolio and strong positions in
unlicensed LTE and fixed wireless accessas well as innovative backhaul solutions, including a strong microwave offeringMobile Networks aims to meet the need for increasingly dense networks to supply the capacity demands of our
changing world.
Finally, through our Global Services offering, we aim to be the most innovative and complete service provider for the connected world. Our
services, solutions and multivendor capabilities help our customers navigate through the evolving technology landscape, network complexity and data growth as well as improve personalized end user experience while supporting them in day-to-day
network planning, implementation, operations and maintenance. We differentiate strategically through our service delivery by driving speed, quality and efficiency with the right combination of local expertise and globalized delivery centers, as
well as advanced analytics, virtualization and automation using the Nokia AVA platform.
Competition
The mobile networks market is a highly consolidated market and our main competitors are Huawei and Ericsson. Additionally, there are two regional vendors, ZTE and
Samsung, that operate with a below 10% market share. As network infrastructure gets virtualized and cloudified, we expect IT companies to emerge, such as HP Enterprise.
|
|
|
NOKIA ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 20-F 2016 |
|
27 |
Networks business continued
Market overview
The primary market for our Fixed Network business group includes technologies for fixed access and related services in addition to fixed network transformation services
with focus on transformation of legacy fixed switching networks. The primary market for Fixed Networks was estimated at EUR 9 billion in 2016. In this market, we see a shift from copper to fiber technologies. The copper market is currently
stable partially due to Nokia-driven innovations that improve the performance of the existing copper networks.
The adjacent market, including verticals, for Fixed
Networks includes virtualization solutions for cable access platforms, Digital Home (IoT) and passive optical LAN. The vertical market, including verticals, was estimated at EUR 3 billion in 2016, including related services.
Business overview and organization
The adjacent
market, including verticals, for Fixed business group provides copper, fiber and coax access products, solutions and services to deliver more bandwidth to more people, faster and in a cost-efficient way. The portfolio allows for a customized
combination of technologies that brings fiber to the most economical point for our customers. It consists of advanced copper-based solutions to boost capacity on existing copper infrastructure, such as VDSL2 Vectoring, Vplus and G.fast.
The Fixed Networks business group is also a leader in fiber-to-the-home solutions, such as Ethernet point-to-point, and
all versions of Passive Optical Networks (PON), including EPON and GPON, as well as 10 gigabit next generation fiber technologies (XGS-PON and TWDM-PON). Together with Nokia Bell Labs, we continue innovation and development of even
higher-capacity technologies like XG-Fast, which allows 10 Gb/s over copper, and XLG-PON enabling 40 Gb/s symmetrical bandwidth over fiber.
With our acquisition
of Gainspeed, a California-based start-up specializing in DAA solutions for the cable industry via its Virtual Converged Cable Access Platform (Virtual CCAP) product line, we have complemented our fiber access technologies for
cable multiple-system operators. With this enhanced product portfolio, we provide cable operators with the end-to-end technology capabilities needed to support growing capacity requirements today and into the future. With this acquisition,
we are able to offer a turnkey solution for the cable industry that includes products for routing, transport, wireless and analytics.
Additionally,
our smart home solution supports digital home devices that enable communication providers to provide enriched customer experiences and diversify their offering.
The Fixed Networks services portfolio is based on our unparalleled expertise and experience and is comprised of
deployment, maintenance and professional services such as copper and fiber broadband evolution, public switched telephone network transformation, ultra-broadband network design, deployment and operation, site implementation and outside plant,
as well as multivendor maintenance.
Competition
The competitive landscape in fixed access has similar characteristics to the mobile access where the market is dominated by three main vendors, Huawei, Nokia and
ZTE and a handful of other vendors with less than 10% market share.
|
|
|
28 |
|
NOKIA ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 20-F 2016 |
Market overview
The primary market for our IP/Optical Networks business group includes routing and optical technologies and related services sold to CSPs. This market includes
technologies such as IP edge and core routing, mobile packet core and Wave Division Multiplex and Optical Multi-Service Network solutions. The primary market for IP/Optical Networks was estimated at EUR 28 billion in 2016.
A significant portion of IP/Optical Networks revenue is derived from its vertical market, which includes customer segments like Webscales, energy, transport, public
sector and TXLEs. We have also included technologies like SDN controllers, addressed with our Nuage portfolio, in this market. The vertical market was estimated at EUR 6 billion in 2016.
Business overview and organization
The
IP/Optical Networks business group provides the high-performance and massively scalable networks that underpin the digital worlds dynamic interconnectivity. IP/Optical Networks portfolio of carrier-grade software, systems and services play
across multiple domains, from programmable IP and optical transport networks for the smart fabric to software-defined capabilities for the programmable network operating system and more.
The networks of CSPs are under tremendous pressure from Cloud-based applications, ultra-broadband evolution and the IoT.
IP/Optical Networks solutions reduce CSPs time-to-market and risk in launching new services, enabling rapid scaling to meet surging demands in the most optimized configurations. The solutions further assure that network services are delivered with
consistent quality, reliability and security and that restorative actions are automatically initiated when any parameter varies beyond set limits. These carrier-grade attributes also benefitand are valued bythe needs of vertical markets
including internet content providers, public sector and verticals, and TXLEs.
The IP/Optical Networks product portfolio includes:
∎ |
|
comprehensive IP and optical Wide Area Networking (WAN) solutions that dynamically, reliably and securely connect people and things from any technology modality to any Cloud at the lowest cost-per-bit;
|
∎ |
|
advanced, Cloud-optimized IP service gateways for residential, business, mobile and IoT services and unique hybrid solutions enabling a converged services future; |
∎ |
|
carrier SDN solutions for network management that dynamically provision, optimize and assure network services and resources end-to-end, from access to the Cloud, and spanning IP and optical technology layers;
|
∎ |
|
advanced datacenter automation and software-defined WAN solutions that configure network connectivity among Clouds and to any enterprise branch office with the ease and efficiency of Cloud compute using
products from our Nuage portfolio; |
∎ |
|
advanced IP video services offering the utmost user experience streamed efficiently and flawlessly from the Cloud; and |
∎ |
|
an extensive portfolio of professional services to accelerate the benefits of integrating new technologies to transform networks and leverage the latest innovations in SDN, virtualization, video
and programmable all-IP networks. |
Competition
The competitive landscape is dominated by Cisco, Juniper, Huawei and Nokia in addition to various specialized players in optics such as Ciena.
|
|
|
NOKIA ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 20-F 2016 |
|
29 |
Networks business continued
Market overview
The Applications & Analytics market is focused on software platforms and applications that help CSPs to optimize their operations, monetize services and
improve customer experiences. Applications & Analytics primary businesses include Business Support Systems (BSS), Operational Support Systems (OSS) and Service Delivery Platforms (SDP). The primary
market for Applications & Analytics and associated professional services was estimated at EUR 12 billion in 2016.
The adjacent market, including
verticals, for Applications & Analytics includes emerging software and services for Self-Organizing Networks (SON), Cloud, Analytics, Security and IoT. From a customer perspective this market also includes
Webscales, digital enterprises and IoT verticals. The adjacent market, including verticals, was estimated at EUR 6 billion in 2016.
Business overview and organization
The Applications & Analytics business group is our dedicated software business.
We have long-standing positions in its primary markets: our BSS solutions support hundreds of millions of subscribers and manage over 1.5 billion devices each day; we lead in LTE network management; we have thousands of OSS
deployments with differentiated capabilities in service assurance, automation, analytics and Cloud; and our Session Border Controller, a SDP that secures network borders and connects an exploding number of devices, stands out for its
virtualization capabilities.
These markets are being reshaped by four trends: the transition to the Cloud, the growth of the IoT, the increased need
for security and privacy, and the impact of augmented intelligence and machine learning. These trends impact the way networks will operate, how new services and business models will be monetized, how customer expectations will evolve
and the speed at which CSPs and TXLEs will need to innovate.
The Applications & Analytics business group is driving an aggressive innovation agenda
that includes an Emerging Business unit that is developing software for IoT, security, Cloud, SON, and analytics. These advances are helping our customers:
∎ |
|
modernize BSS systems to rapidly launch and monetize new IoT and Cloud services; |
∎ |
|
improve customer experiences with rich analytics and machine learning; |
∎ |
|
operate larger networks and more services with fewer staff through virtualization and automation; |
∎ |
|
predict issues before they happen with augmented intelligence; |
∎ |
|
scale IoT services with a platform that handles data collection, event processing, device management, data contextualization, data analytics, and end-to-end security; |
∎ |
|
increase the success of digital transformations with improved processes, collaboration and profitability; and |
∎ |
|
secure services and data with confidence. |
Growing this business into a standalone software business at scale is a key
tenet of our strategy. Please refer to Our strategy for more information on our strategy.
Competition
The Applications & Analytics business group operates in a highly fragmented market in which very few players have a market share above 10%. Our main
competitors are Ericsson, Huawei, Amdocs, Oracle, HPE, Cisco and Netcracker.
|
|
|
30 |
|
NOKIA ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 20-F 2016 |
Within our
Networks business
Services
Our Services are focused on developing innovative services, solutions and multivendor capabilities around the mobile, fixed and IP networks and beyond. With our
full service portfolio we address the current and future needs of our customers, including network operators, public sector, TXLEs and transportation. Customer satisfaction, quality and efficiency are key in service delivery. To achieve that, we
leverage a combination of local engagement with the customers, the network of Global Delivery Centers, and Nokia AVA, the next-generation delivery platform. Altogether, our service portfolio and delivery are powered by 38 000 services experts around
the globe.
Sales and marketing
The Customer Operations (CO) organization is responsible for sales and account management across the four network-oriented business groups. The CO teams are
active in approximately 130 countries to ensure that we are close to our customers, both physically and in terms of understanding the local markets, thus helping us build and maintain our customer relationships. Refer to General facts on
NokiaProduction of infrastructure equipment and products for more information on our manufacturing facilities globally.
The CO organization is divided
into seven markets:
∎ |
|
Asia-Pacific and Japan spans a varied geographical scope, ranging from advanced telecommunications markets, such as Japan and the Republic of Korea, to developing markets including Bangladesh, Myanmar and
Vietnam. We work with leading operators in the market, including Indosat, KDDI, KT, LG Uplus, NBN Australia, NTT DoCoMo, Singtel, SK Broadband, SK Telecom, Smartfren, SoftBank, Spark, StarHub, Telekom Malaysia, Telkom Indonesia, Telkomsel, VNPT
and Vodafone. |
We have close technology cooperation with leading operators in Korea and Japan as well as two
Service Delivery Hubs located in Japan and Indonesia.
∎ |
|
In Europe, we are engaged with all the major operators, including Deutsche Telekom, MegaFon, MTS Sistema, Orange, Telefónica, Telia Company and Vodafone Group, serving millions of customers. We have
extensive R&D expertise in Europe, and some of our largest Technology Centers, which are developing future mobile broadband technologies, are based in this market. We also have a Global Delivery Center and four regional Service Delivery Hubs in
Europe. |
∎ |
|
In Greater China, we are the number one player with headquarters outside China, and we are working with all the operators including China Mobile, China Telecom, China Tower and China Unicom. We have also
extended our market presence to the public and enterprise sectors, including railways and public security. In Taiwan, we work with all major operators, including Chunghwa Telecom and Taiwan Mobile. In China, we have six Technology Centers,
one regional Service Delivery Hub and more than 80 offices spread over megacities and provinces. |
∎ |
|
In India, we are a strong supplier and service provider to the leading public and private operators, including Bharti Airtel, Vodafone, Reliance Jio, Idea, BSNL, MTNL, Aircel and Uninor. Collectively, our
networks for these operators carry over 280 million subscribers across over 230 000 sites, and these figures are growing every day. In addition, we are a key telecom infrastructure supplier to non-operator segments, including large
enterprises, utilities companies such as Tata Power and GAIL, Indian defense sector through L&T and BEL, and we are a strategic telecommunication partner for GSM-Railways technology to Indian Railways, including Kolkata Metro Railways and
DMRC (Delhi Metro Rail Corporation). We have a Global Delivery Center, a Service Delivery Hub and a Global Technology Center in India.
|
∎ |
|
In Latin America, 16% of the population use LTE services, and high-speed fixed broadband is still in its early phase. With the aim of providing broadband services to a population of over
600 million people in the area, we supply ultra-competitive solutions to all major operators, such as América Móvil, AT&T, Oi, Telefónica, Telmex and Tim, as well as local operator groups, such as Avantel, Milicom,
Nuevatel and Personal. |
∎ |
|
In Middle East and Africa, we have built a position of considerable strength, working alongside leading operators such as Airtel, du, Etisalat, Maroc Telecom, Mobily, MTN, Ooredoo, Orange, OTA Djezzy,
Smile, STC, Telkom, Vodacom and Zain, among our key customers in the market. |
∎ |
|
In North America, we count all the major operators as our key customers. We also deliver advanced IP networking, ultra-broadband access, and Cloud technology solutions to a wide array of
customers, including local service providers, cable operators, large enterprises, state and local governments, utilities, and many others. North America is also home to the companys most important and thriving innovation practicesfrom
the renowned Nokia Bell Labs headquarters in Murray Hill, New Jersey, to the development labs of Nokia Technologies in Silicon Valley. |
In
addition, we have a dedicated sales organization focused on driving mission-critical communications sales to organizations outside the telecommunications operator market. This structure is targeted at allowing us to gain speed and efficiency in
dealing with customer requirements and cultivating new and existing customer relationships.
The Global Enterprise and Public Sector organization focuses on
four segments vertical to the telecommunications operators that require mission-critical communications networks: Public Safety, Transportation, Energy and TXLEs. This global sales organization is dedicated to serving the needs of customers
such as Nedaa in Dubai, which provides telecommunication
|
|
|
NOKIA ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 20-F 2016 |
|
31 |
Networks business continued
services to all specialized governmental, semi-governmental and private institutions; the Swiss railway company
SBB (Swiss BundesBahn); the Swiss electricity transmission system operator Swissgrid; Smart City initiatives e.g. Bristol is open, which aim at exploring solutions to make cities smarter, safer and more sustainable; and name-brand banks
such as BBVA and Santander that are transforming complex legacy environments into leading-edge Clouds that improve their global customer experience.
Research and development
Our Networks business is one of the industrys largest R&D investors in
information communication technology and we expect it to drive innovation across telecommunications and vertical industries to meet the needs of a digitally connected world. Product development is continually underway to meet the
highly programmable, agile and efficiency requirements of the next generation software-defined networks that will accommodate the IoT, intelligent analytics, and automation used to forge new human possibilities.
Our four networks-focused business groups are responsible for product R&D within the Networks business. The Networks business has a global network of R&D
centers, each with individual technology and competence specialties. The main R&D centers are located in Belgium, Canada, China, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, India, Italy, Japan, Poland, the Philippines, Portugal, Romania, the
United Kingdom and the United States. We believe that the geographical diversity of our R&D network is an important competitive advantage for us. In addition, the ecosystem around each R&D center helps us to connect with experts on a
global scale and our R&D network is further complemented by cooperation with universities and other research facilities.
Innovation steering within our Networks business is carried out by the Chief Innovation and Operating Office
(CIOO). For R&D activities of our Nokia Technologies business group refer to Nokia TechnologiesResearch and development. Within the CIOO, the Chief Technology Office (CTO) and
Nokia Bell Labs organization are responsible for our research agenda and research portfolio along with group services for architecture, compliance, reliability and standards. The CIOO develops disruptive technologies, incubates these
technologies into novel prototype systems and solutions and then launches them through our business groups to generate growth and differentiation across our entire portfolio. The CIOO organization also steers innovation externally with customers,
partners and governments, and has new solutions tested in collaboration with customers and our business groups.
In response to the six megatrends identified
by Nokia as driving the Programmable World (for a more detailed description refer to Our strategy above), Nokia Bell Labs has defined the Future X network architecturea massively distributed, cognitive, continuously adaptive,
learning and optimizing network connecting humans, senses, things, systems, infrastructure, and processes. All of our Networks business groupsand also Nokia Technologiesare committed to this single architecture view and are developing
products in their respective domains to build seamless end-to-end solutions in the future:
∎ |
|
Mobile Networks will enable 1 000X higher throughput, 100X lower latency, 10X peak speed, support for multiple spectrum bands and technologies by building application-aware and self-organizing networks that are
ultra-secure; |
∎ |
|
Fixed Networks will provide massive-scale, ubiquitous access, fiber-like speed over any media, and flexible software-defined access;
|
∎ |
|
IP/Optical Networks will implement terabit scale capacity, dynamic cloud-optimized smart networks and unlimited network programmability/slicing; |
∎ |
|
Applications & Analytics will automate edge/Telco Cloud networks, and enable cognitive network operation and future enterprise interactivity, as well as provide terabit-scale automated IoT/device management
contextual security; and |
∎ |
|
Nokia Technologies will explore and innovate new digital value platforms, as well as continue to innovate professional and consumer devices and technologies, with focus on digital health and digital media.
|
Patents and licenses
Intellectual property assets are fundamental to Nokia, which owns a large patent portfolio of more than 26 000 patent families, originating from three distinct
organizations (Nokia Technologies, Nokia Solutions and Networks and Alcatel Lucent). The Patent Business in Nokia Technologies is the primary monetization entity for patent assets. Refer to Nokia TechnologiesPatents and licenses
for a description of the patent licensing activities of Nokia Technologies.
Our Networks business, including Nokia Bell Labs, generates valuable patents from their
industry leading R&D in fields, such as wireless, IP networking, ultra-broadband access and Cloud technologies and applications.
Our patent portfolio
includes high-quality standard-essential patents (SEPs) and patent applications which have been declared to the European Telecommunications Standards Institute and other Standards Developing Organizations as essential to standards
including LTE, WCDMA, GSM and other standards. We continue to drive new patent generation.
Our Networks business has patent license agreements in place with a
number of third parties as part of its ordinary course of business.
|
|
|
32 |
|
NOKIA ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 20-F 2016 |
|
|
|
|
|
Nokia Bell Labs |
|
|
Nokia Bell Labs is the world-renowned industrial research and innovation arm of Nokia. Over its 90-year history, Nokia Bell Labs has invented many of the foundational
technologies that underpin information and communications networks and all digital devices and systems. This research has resulted in eight Nobel Prizes, two Turing Awards, three Japan Prizes, a plethora of National Medals of Science and
Engineering, as well as an Oscar, two Grammys and an Emmy award for technical innovation. Nokia Bell Labs continues to conduct disruptive research focused on solving the challenges of the new digital era, defined by the contextual connection
and interaction of everything and everyone. |
|
Nokia Bell Labs searches for the fundamental limits of what is possible, rather than being constrained by the current state of the art.
It looks to the future to understand essential human needs and the potential barriers to enabling this new human existence. It then uses its unique diversity of research intellects and disciplines and perspectives to solve the key complex
problems by discovering or inventing disruptive innovations that have the power to enable new economic capabilities, new societal behaviors, new business models and new types of servicesin other words, to drive technological
revolutions. Research at Nokia Bell Labs is focused on key scientific, technological,
engineering or mathematical areas which require 10x or more improvement in one or more dimensions. It then combines these areas of research into the Future X network architecture, which brings these disruptive research elements together
into industry-redefining solutions. These innovations are brought to market through our business groups or through technology and patent licensing. Nokia Bell Labs also engages directly with the market and customers through its consulting service to
help define the path to the future network with business model innovation and the optimum techno-economics.
This model of defining future needs and inventing game-changing solutions to critical problems while advising the market on the path forward has been the constant
mission of Nokia Bell Labs. |
|
Nokia Bell Labs and Alcatel-Lucent Submarine Networks achieved
65 Tb/s transmission record for transoceanic cable systems using Bell Labs new Probabilistic Constellation Shaping (PCS) technology, a ground-breaking new modulation technique that maximizes the
distance and capacity of high-speed transmission in optical networks. |
|
|
|
|
|
Nokia Bell Labs, Deutsche Telekom T-Labs and the Technical
University of Munich achieved a 1 Tb/s transmission rate over optical fiber using Bell Labs Probabilistic Constellation Shaping technology to provide greater flexibility and performance enabling optical
networks to operate closer to the Shannon limit to meet growing consumer and business data demands.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nokia Bell Labs achieved the worlds first 10 Gb/s symmetrical data speeds over traditional cable access networks using XG-CABLE that is based on unique access technology innovations and applications developed by Nokia Bell Labs.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NOKIA ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 20-F 2016 |
|
33 |
|
|
|
34 |
|
NOKIA ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 20-F 2016 |
Nokia Technologies
Nokia Technologies is an engine
of growth and innovation for Nokia.
Nokia Technologies develops advanced consumer and professional technology products in Digital Health and Digital Media,
and licenses our industry-leading innovations as well as the Nokia brand for mobile devices. Nokia Technologies is determined to explore, discover and develop the ways in which technology can transform our lives. Whether taking steps
towards a healthier life or sharing experiences like never before, Nokia Technologies makes our vision for a connected future your reality for today. Nokia Technologies mission is to create effortless and impactful technological products
and solutions that expand human possibilities.
Market overview
Nokia Technologies is driving innovation and product development in two key growing sectors of consumer technologyVR and digital healthas well as overseeing
the reintroduction of the Nokia brand to handsets through a licensing agreement with HMD Global and the expansion of our patent licensing business based on decades of innovation and R&D leadership in enabling technologies used in virtually all
mobile devices used today.
The market for VR products and technologies remains at a very early stage, with estimates of the total market as
high as EUR 65 billion by 2020, with significant growth expected over the next five to ten years. We believe the solutions we develop today, the standards we establish and the patents associated with them, will position us as a leading
player in this market as adoption grows in products as well as in technology licensing.
The global digital health market is expected to grow exponentially over the
next five to seven years, up to EUR 220 billion by 2020. Within that market, we are focused on the segments fueling the most significant growth: 1) connected devices that go beyond trackers and smart watches to include scales and blood pressure
monitors; and 2) remote patient monitoring.
Smartphones, feature phones, and tablets had a global estimated market of over EUR 400 billion in 2016,
accounting for nearly 40% of the total consumer electronics segment. In the automotive industry, expectations are that around half of the approximately 100 million new cars sold annually around the world will have connectivity in the
next five years.
Business overview and organization
Nokia Technologies consists of a portfolio of four growing businesses.
In
Digital Media, we are pioneers of the technology enabling VR, an exciting new medium that is transporting people to places, events and experiences like never before.
In Digital Health, we are entering the market through our acquisition of Withings with a portfolio of premium, intuitive products designed to inspire the individual to
take control of their own health.
We have established a brand licensing business, and our exclusive brand licensee for mobile phones and tablets, HMD Global,
has already launched new Nokia branded feature phones and smartphones.
Nokia Technologies continues to grow its successful patent licensing business, which drives
most of its revenue today, giving us the ability to invest in our new businesses in a disciplined, venture capital-like manner.
|
|
|
NOKIA ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 20-F 2016 |
|
35 |
Nokia Technologies continued
Sales and marketing
Nokia Technologies has significant ongoing R&D activities and an established patent licensing business. Nokia Technologies manages intellectual property as a
technology asset and seeks a return on its investments by making its innovations available to the markets through licensing activities and transactions. Nokia Technologies currently has more than 100 licensees, mainly for our SEPs. Nokia
Technologies is actively engaged in sales and marketing in support of the OZO VR camera and related technology solutions that enable fully immersive audio and video experiences.
Nokia Technologies is also engaged in sales and marketing activities to support the Withings portfolio of connected heath products in global markets, which
span the regulated and non-regulated segments of the market.
Nokia Technologies introduced the OZO VR camera and related technologies including
the OZO Live solution in the United States, European and Asian markets in 2016 and is engaged in marketing these solutions to professional content creators in industries including film and entertainment, music, sport, news, travel and
education.
Nokia Technologies sees further opportunities in licensing its proprietary technologies, intellectual property and
brand assets into telecommunications and vertical industries.
Research and development
The applied nature of our R&D in Nokia Technologies has resulted in various relevant and valuable inventions in areas that we believe are important for
emerging consumer experiences in the Programmable World, such as underlying connectivity and sensing technologies, as well as codecs for VR video and audio and advanced machine learning-based health analytics.
Nokia Technologies has R&D centers in Finland, France, the United Kingdom and the United States.
Patents and licenses
For
more than 20 years, we have defined many of the fundamental technologies used in virtually all mobile devices and taken a leadership role in standards setting. As a result, we own a leading share of essential patents for GSM, 3G radio and 4G LTE
technologies. These, together with others for Wi-Fi and video standards, form the core of our patent portfolio for monetization purposes. As mentioned above, Nokia Technologies currently has more than 100 licensees, mainly for our SEPs.
|
|
|
36 |
|
NOKIA ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 20-F 2016 |
With the acquisition of Nokia Siemens Networks (NSN) in 2013 and the Acquisition of Alcatel Lucent, we have
added the results of their sustained innovation, including that of Nokia Bell Labs, creating a larger and more valuable IP portfolio than ever before. The portfolio spans more than 26 000 patent families, built on combined R&D
investments of more than EUR 119 billion over the last two decades.
We continue to refresh our portfolio from R&D activities across all of our
businesses, filing patent applications on more than 1 300 new inventions in 2016. Continuing our focus on communications standards, we also expect to have a leading position in 5G. In 2016, we were a leading contributor to the development
of 5G standards. As part of our active portfolio management approach, we are continuously evaluating our collective assets and taking actions to optimize the size of our overall portfolio while preserving the high quality of our patents.
Competition
While several major technology companies are entering the VR market, it is still nascent, and long-term trends for capture and playback solutions have not yet been
identified. We expect opportunities for technology licensing within the VR ecosystem to grow over time.
In Digital Health, we are focused on high growth segments
of the total market, including consumer products in both regulated and non-regulated markets, and going beyond fitness trackers to blood pressure monitors, scales and thermometers, as well as remote patient monitoring. In this area,
Koninklijke Philips N.V. (Philips) is most notable for its competing products. While Fitbit is primarily focused on fitness trackers, they have also pointed to the broader digital health value proposition as part of their evolution.
Number of new filings in 2016
1300+
R&D investment over the last two decades
~EUR119bn
Number of patent licensees
100+
|
|
|
NOKIA ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 20-F 2016 |
|
37 |
|
|
|
38 |
|
NOKIA ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 20-F 2016 |
|
|
|
NOKIA ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 20-F 2016 |
|
39 |
Principal industry trends
affecting operations
Business-specific trends
Networks business
We are a
leading vendor in the network and IP infrastructure, software, and related services market. We provide a broad range of different products, from the hardware components of networks used by network operators and increasingly by customers in
other select verticals, to software solutions supporting the efficient interaction of networks, as well as services to plan, optimize, implement, run and upgrade networks. Our Networks business is conducted through four business groups: Mobile
Networks, Fixed Networks, IP/Optical Networks and Applications & Analytics. These business groups provide an end-to-end portfolio of hardware, software and services to enable us to deliver the next generation of leading networks
solutions and services to our customers. We aim for all four business groups to be innovation leaders, drawing on our frontline R&D capabilities to deliver leading products and services for our customers, and ultimately ensure the
companys long-term value creation. For more information on the Networks business refer to Business overviewNetworks business above.
Industry trends
The networks industry has witnessed certain prominent
trends in recent years, which have also affected our Networks business. First, the increase in the use of data services and the resulting exponential increase in data traffic has resulted in an increased need for high-performance,
high-quality and highly reliable networks. The continuing increase in data traffic has, however, not been directly reflected in operators revenue. Consequently, there is an increased need for efficiency for both operators and
network infrastructure and services vendors.
Second, we are witnessing more operator consolidation driven by operators needs to provide a wider scope of
services, especially through the convergence of disparate network technologies across mobile, fixed, and IP and optical networks. In order to improve networks in terms of coverage, capacity and quality, network operators are continuing their
transition to all-IP architectures, with an emphasis on fast access to their networks through copper, fiber, LTE and new digital services delivery. We are also seeing similar trends with cable operators, who are investing in the deployment of
high-speed networks. Both the fixed mobile convergence and the transition to all-IP architectures were major rationales behind our Acquisition of Alcatel Lucent and creating our end-to-end portfolio of products and services.
Third, we see an increasing demand for large high-performance networks in some key areas outside the traditional CSPs space, which we define as our select
vertical markets. Webscalessuch as Google, Microsoft and Alibabaare investing in Cloud technology and network infrastructure an increasing scale. In addition, other vertical markets such as energy, transportation, government and TXLEs
are investing in their own network infrastructure, to connect data centers and provide seamless IP interconnection and digital services delivery.
Pricing and
price erosion
In 2016, we did not witness a dramatic change in the overall pricing environment. The environment remained similar to what we witnessed
in the prior year, when competition intensified in the first quarter of 2015 and impacted the net sales and profitability of our Networks business.
Product mix
The
profitability of our Networks business is also affected by our product mix, including the share of software in the sales mix. Products and services have varying profitability profiles. For instance, our Ultra Broadband Networks reportable segment
offers a combination of hardware, software and services. Hardware, and especially software products, generally have higher gross margins, but also require significant R&D investment, whereas the service offerings are typically labor-intensive,
while carrying low R&D investment, and have relatively low gross margins compared to the hardware and software products.
Seasonality and cyclical nature of
projects
Our Networks business sales are affected by seasonality in the network operators spending cycles, with generally higher sales in the
fourth quarter, as compared to the first quarter of the following year. In addition to normal industry seasonality, there are normal peaks and troughs in the deployment of large infrastructure projects. The timing of these projects depends on new
radio spectrum allocation, network upgrade cycles and the availability of new consumer devices and services, which in turn affects our Networks business sales. As an example, during the last couple of years some of the major LTE roll-outs
have been largely completed. The next major technology cycle is expected to begin in 2017 when early use-case trials of 5G technology are expected to start, with the initial commercial deployments currently expected to start in 2018.
Another example of cyclicality is the IP/Optical Networks market, where network operators often first deploy optical capacity into their networks, which is then followed by investments in routing equipment.
|
|
|
40 |
|
NOKIA ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 20-F 2016 |
|
|
|
Continued operational efficiency improvements In
2016, our Networks business continued to focus on operational improvement across its business groups. In order to continue to make our Networks business more efficient, higher-performing and positioned for long-term success, we aim to further
strengthen our productivity, efficiency and competitive cost structure. To help us achieve this, we continue to bring performance excellence methodologies such as Kaizen, Lean and Six Sigma to all areas of the business. Our Networks business will
also pursue further efficiency gains from increased automation in delivery of Global Services and in other areas, as well as continued improvements in R&D efficiency and agility.
Cost of components and raw materials
There are several important factors driving the profitability and competitiveness of our Networks business: scale, operational efficiency and pricing, and cost
discipline. The costs of our networks products comprise, among others, components, manufacturing, labor and overheads, royalties and licensing fees, depreciation of product machinery, logistics and warranty and other quality costs. |
|
|
|
|
|
NOKIA ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 20-F 2016 |
|
41 |
Principal industry trends
affecting operations continued
Nokia Technologies
Nokia
Technologies pursues new business opportunities building on our innovations and the Nokia brand. Nokia Technologies develops and licenses cutting-edge innovations that are powering the next revolution in computing and mobility. The Nokia
Technologies strategy consists of: 1) patent licensing, focused on licensing standard-essential and other patents in the Nokia portfolio to companies in the mobile devices market and beyond; 2) technology licensing, focused on
licensing proprietary technologies to enable our customers to build better products; 3) brand partnerships, to help our customers leverage the value of the Nokia brand in consumer devices; and 4) incubation, focused on developing new
products and solutions in the areas of digital media and digital health. All of these activities are supported by Nokia Bell Labs, our world-class R&D team. For more information on the Nokia Technologies business, refer to
Business overviewNokia Technologies.
Monetization strategies of IPR
Success in the technology industry requires significant R&D investment, with the resulting patents and other IPR utilized to protect and
generate a return on those investments and related inventions. In recent years, we have seen new entrants in the mobile device industry, many of which do not have licenses to our patents. Our aim is to approach these companies by
potentially using one or more means of monetization. We believe we are well-positioned to protect, and build on, our existing industry-leading patent portfolio, and consequently to increase our shareholders value.
We see a number of means of monetizing our innovations: on the one hand, we seek to license our patent portfolio, the Nokia brand and new technological innovations
to be integrated into other companies products and services. On the other hand, our incubation activities may also, from time to time, lead to concepts that we bring to the market ourselves as products or services like OZO, the extraordinary
VR camera designed and built specifically for professional content
creators. We also accelerated our expansion into digital health in 2016 with the acquisition of Withings SA, a leading
innovator in health and lifestyle product technology with a family of award-winning digital health products and services. Overall, we have sharpened our focus on research and product development in alignment with the strategic growth
opportunities we see emerging in the areas of digital health and digital media, including preventive health care and immersive VR.
In patent licensing,
the main opportunities we are pursuing are: 1) renewing existing license agreements, and negotiating new license agreements with mobile device manufacturers; and 2) expanding the scope of licensing activities to other industries,
in particular those that implement mobile communication technologies. We no longer need patent licenses for our own mobile phone business, enabling the possibility of improving the balance of inbound and outbound patent licensing.
In brand licensing, we will continue to seek further opportunities to bring the Nokia brand into consumer devices, by
licensing our brand and other intellectual property, as well as, for example, industrial design. For example, under a strategic agreement covering branding rights and intellectual property licensing, Nokia Technologies granted HMD Global, a
newly founded company based in Finland, an exclusive global license to create Nokia-branded mobile phones and tablets for the next ten years.
In
technology licensing, the opportunities are more long-term in our view, but we will look at opportunities to license technologies developed by Nokia Technologies and delivered to partners in consumer electronics as solutions or technology
packages that can be integrated into their products and services to help enable the Programmable World.
To grow each of the aforementioned business programs, it is
necessary to invest in commercial capabilities to support them.
|
|
|
42 |
|
NOKIA ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 20-F 2016 |
General trends in IPR licensing
In general, there has been increased focus
on IPR protection and licensing, and this trend is expected to continue. As such, new agreements are generally a product of lengthy negotiations and potential litigation or arbitration, and therefore the timing and outcome may be difficult
to forecast. Due to the structure of patent license agreements, the payments may be very infrequent, at times may be partly retrospective, and the lengths of license agreements can vary.
Additionally, there are clear regional differences in the ease of protecting and licensing patented innovations. We have seen some licensees actively avoiding making
license payments, and some licensors using aggressive methods to collect them; both behaviors have attracted regulatory attention. We expect discussion of the regulation of licensing to continue at both a global and a regional level. Some
of those regulatory developments may be adverse to the interests of technology developers and patent owners, including us.
Research, development and patent
portfolio development
As the creation of new technology assets and patented innovations is heavily focused on R&D activities with long lead-times
to incremental revenues, we may from time to time see investment opportunities that have strategic importance. This generally affects the operating expenses before sales reflect a return on those investments.
Trends affecting our businesses
Exchange rates
We are a company with
global operations and net sales derived from various countries, invoiced in various currencies. Therefore, our business and results from operations are exposed to changes in exchange rates between the euro, our reporting currency,
and other currencies, such as the U.S. dollar and the Chinese yuan. The magnitude of foreign exchange exposures changes over time as a function of our net sales and costs in different markets, as well as the prevalent currencies used for
transactions in those markets. Refer also to General facts on NokiaSelected financial dataExchange rate data below.
To mitigate
the impact of changes in exchange rates on our results, we hedge material net foreign exchange exposures (net sales less costs in a currency) typically with up to a 12-month hedging horizon. For the majority of these hedges, hedge
accounting is applied to reduce income statement volatility.
In 2016, approximately 25% of Continuing operations net sales and approximately 25% of Continuing
operations costs were denominated in euro. In 2016, approximately 50% of Continuing operations net sales were denominated in U.S. dollar and approximately 10% in Chinese yuan.
During 2016, the U.S. dollar appreciated against the euro and this had a positive impact on our net sales expressed in
euros. However, the stronger U.S. dollar also contributed to higher cost of sales and operating expenses, as approximately 45% of our total cost base was in U.S. dollars. In total, before hedging, the appreciation of the U.S. dollar
had a slightly positive effect on our operating profit in 2016.
During 2016, the Chinese yuan depreciated against the euro and this had a negative impact on our
net sales expressed in euros. However, the weaker Chinese yuan also contributed to lower cost of sales and operating expenses, as approximately 10% of Continuing operations total costs were denominated in Chinese yuan. In total, before hedging,
the depreciation of the Chinese yuan had a slightly negative effect on our operating profit in 2016.
Significant changes in exchange rates may also impact our
competitive position and related price pressures through their impact on our competitors.
For a discussion of the instruments used by us in connection with
our hedging activities, refer to Note 36, Risk management of our consolidated financial statements included in this annual report on Form 20-F. Refer also to Operating and financial review and prospectsRisk factors.
The average currency mix for net sales and total
costs:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2016 |
|
|
|
|
2015 |
|
Currency |
|
Net sales |
|
|
Total costs |
|
|
|
|
Net sales |
|
|
Total costs |
|
EUR |
|
|
~25% |
|
|
|
~25% |
|
|
|
|
|
~30% |
|
|
|
~30% |
|
USD |
|
|
~50% |
|
|
|
~45% |
|
|
|
|
|
~35% |
|
|
|
~30% |
|
CNY |
|
|
~10% |
|
|
|
~10% |
|
|
|
|
|
~10% |
|
|
|
~10% |
|
Other |
|
|
~15% |
|
|
|
~20% |
|
|
|
|
|
~25% |
|
|
|
~30% |
|
Total |
|
|
100% |
|
|
|
100% |
|
|
|
|
|
100% |
|
|
|
100% |
|
|
|
|
NOKIA ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 20-F 2016 |
|
43 |
Results of operations
The financial information included in this Operating and financial review and
prospects section as of December 31, 2016 and 2015 and for each of the three years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014 has been derived from our audited consolidated financial statements included in this annual report on Form
20-F. The financial information as of December 31, 2016 and 2015 and for each of the three years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014 should be read in conjunction with, and is qualified in its entirety by reference to, our audited
consolidated financial statements.
In 2016, following the Acquisition of Alcatel Lucent on January 4, 2016 (refer to Note 5, Acquisitions, of our consolidated
financial statements included in this annual report on Form 20-F), we revised our financial reporting structure. We have two businesses: Nokias Networks business and Nokia Technologies, and three reportable segments for financial reporting
purposes: Ultra Broadband Networks and IP Networks and Applications (within Nokias Networks business) and Nokia Technologies. We also present certain segment data for Group Common and Other as well as for Discontinued operations. The
comparative financial information presented below has been prepared to reflect the financial results of our Continuing operations as if the new financial reporting structure had been in operation for the full years 2015 and 2014. Certain accounting
policy alignments, adjustments and reclassifications have been necessary. Refer to Note 4, Segment information, of our consolidated financial statements included in this annual report on Form 20-F.
Continuing operations
For the year ended December 31, 2016 compared to the year ended December 31, 2015
The following table sets forth selective line items and the percentage of net sales for the years indicated.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the year ended December 31 |
|
2016 EURm |
|
|
% of net sales |
|
|
2015 EURm |
|
|
% of net sales |
|
|
Year-on-year
change % |
|
Net sales |
|
|
23 614 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
|
|
12 499 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
|
|
89 |
|
Cost of sales |
|
|
(15 158 |
) |
|
|
(64.2 |
) |
|
|
(6 963 |
) |
|
|
(55.7 |
) |
|
|
118 |
|
Gross profit |
|
|
8 456 |
|
|
|
35.8 |
|
|
|
5 536 |
|
|
|
44.3 |
|
|
|
53 |
|
Research and development expenses |
|
|
(4 904 |
) |
|
|
(20.8 |
) |
|
|
(2 080 |
) |
|
|
(16.6 |
) |
|
|
136 |
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses |
|
|
(3 819 |
) |
|
|
(16.2 |
) |
|
|
(1 772 |
) |
|
|
(14.2 |
) |
|
|
116 |
|
Other income and expenses |
|
|
(833 |
) |
|
|
(3.5 |
) |
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
Operating (loss)/profit |
|
|
(1 100 |
) |
|
|
(4.7 |
) |
|
|
1 697 |
|
|
|
13.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
Share of results of associated companies and joint ventures |
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
29 |
|
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
(38 |
) |
Financial income and expenses |
|
|
(287 |
) |
|
|
(1.2 |
) |
|
|
(186 |
) |
|
|
(1.5 |
) |
|
|
(54 |
) |
(Loss)/profit before tax |
|
|
(1 369 |
) |
|
|
(5.8 |
) |
|
|
1 540 |
|
|
|
12.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
Income tax benefit/(expense) |
|
|
457 |
|
|
|
1.9 |
|
|
|
(346 |
) |
|
|
(2.8 |
) |
|
|
|
|
(Loss)/profit for the year |
|
|
(912 |
) |
|
|
(3.9 |
) |
|
|
1 194 |
|
|
|
9.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales
Continuing operations net sales in 2016 were EUR 23 614 million, an increase of EUR 11 115 million, or 89%, compared to
EUR 12 499 million in 2015. The increase in Continuing operations net sales was primarily attributable to growth in Nokias Networks business and Group Common and Other, primarily related to the Acquisition of Alcatel Lucent and,
to a lesser extent, growth in Nokia Technologies.
Nokias Networks business net sales in 2016 were EUR 21 800 million, an increase of
EUR 10 313 million, or 90%, compared to EUR 11 487 million in 2015. Ultra Broadband Networks net sales were EUR 15 771 million in 2016, an increase of EUR 5 612 million, or 55%, compared to
EUR 10 159 million in 2015. IP Networks and Applications net sales were EUR 6 029 million in 2016, an increase of EUR 4 701 million compared to EUR 1 328 million in 2015. The increase in
Ultra Broadband Networks net sales is comprised of an increase in Mobile Networks net sales of EUR 3 383 million and an increase in Fixed Networks net sales of EUR 2 229 million. The increase in Mobile Networks net sales was primarily
attributable to the Acquisition of Alcatel Lucent, which drove higher net sales in both Radio Networks and Services. This was partially offset by revenue declines from several key customers in Asia-Pacific and North America due to previous
build-outs and investments, as well as adverse market conditions in Latin America. The increase in Fixed Networks net sales was primarily attributable to the Acquisition of Alcatel Lucent, and increases in Broadband Access, supported by the
completion of a large project in Asia-Pacific.
The increase in IP Networks and Applications net sales is comprised of an increase in IP/Optical Networks net sales
of EUR 3 987 million and an increase in Applications & Analytics net sales of EUR 714 million, primarily attributable to the Acquisition of Alcatel Lucent. The increase in IP/Optical Networks net sales was
attributable to an increase in IP Routing net sales of EUR 2 425 million and an increase in Optical Networks net sales of EUR 1 562 million. The increase in Applications & Analytics net sales was primarily
attributable to the Acquisition of Alcatel Lucent, and increases in Services.
Group Common and Other net sales in 2016 were EUR 1 145 million, an
increase of EUR 1 145 million, compared to approximately zero in 2015. The increase in Group Common and Other net sales was primarily due to ASN and RFS net sales.
Nokia Technologies net sales in 2016 were EUR 1 053 million, an increase of EUR 26 million, or 3%, compared to EUR 1 027 million in 2015.
The increase in Nokia Technologies net sales was primarily attributable to higher IPR licensing income and the inclusion of Withings net sales from June 2016 onwards resulting from the acquisition of Withings, partially offset by the absence
of non-recurring adjustments to accrued net sales from existing and new agreements, and lower licensing income from certain existing licensees.
|
|
|
44 |
|
NOKIA ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 20-F 2016 |
The following table sets forth distribution of net sales by geographical area for the years indicated.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the year ended December 31 |
|
2016 EURm |
|
|
2015 EURm |
|
|
Year-on-year
change % |
|
Asia-Pacific |
|
|
4 206 |
|
|
|
3 230 |
|
|
|
30 |
|
Europe(1) |
|
|
6 393 |
|
|
|
3 813 |
|
|
|
68 |
|
Greater China |
|
|
2 656 |
|
|
|
1 712 |
|
|
|
55 |
|
Latin America |
|
|
1 457 |
|
|
|
973 |
|
|
|
50 |
|
Middle East & Africa |
|
|
1 871 |
|
|
|
1 177 |
|
|
|
59 |
|
North America |
|
|
7 031 |
|
|
|
1 594 |
|
|
|
341 |
|
Total |
|
|
23 614 |
|
|
|
12 499 |
|
|
|
89 |
|
(1) |
All Nokia Technologies IPR and licensing net sales are allocated to Finland. |
Refer to Results of
segmentsNokias Networks business for the main changes in regional net sales.
Gross margin
Gross margin for Continuing operations in 2016 was 35.8% compared to 44.3% in 2015. The decrease in gross margin was primarily due to Nokias Networks business
and, to a lesser extent, Nokia Technologies and Group Common and Other.
Nokias Networks business gross margin in 2016 was 38.5%, compared to 39.0% in 2015.
The slight decrease in Nokias Networks business gross margin was due to decreases in both Ultra Broadband Networks gross margin and IP Networks and Applications gross margin. Ultra Broadband Networks gross margin in 2016 was 36.3%, compared to
37.5% in 2015. The decrease in Ultra Broadband Networks gross margin was primarily attributable to higher central cost of sales in Mobile Networks, partially offset by favorable region and product mix, and the completion of a large Fixed Networks
project in the Asia-Pacific region. IP Networks and Applications gross margin in 2016 was 44.1%, compared to 50.9% in 2015. The decrease in IP Networks and Applications gross margin was primarily attributable to changes in the business volume
and mix, primarily attributable to the Acquisition of Alcatel Lucent.
Nokia Technologies gross margin in 2016 was 96.0%, compared to 99.3% in 2015. The decrease in
Nokia Technologies gross margin in 2016 was primarily attributable to new, lower gross margin business in digital health from Withings, and to a lesser extent, digital media.
Group Common and Other gross margin in 2016 was 16.8%. The Group Common and Other gross margin was attributable to gross margin in ASN and RFS.
In 2016, cost of sales included working capital-related purchase price allocation adjustments of EUR 509 million, which resulted in higher cost of sales and
lower gross profit when the inventory was sold; and product portfolio integration-related costs of EUR 274 million.
Operating
expenses
Our R&D expenses for Continuing operations in 2016 were EUR 4 904 million, an increase of EUR 2 824 million,
or 136%, compared to EUR 2 080 million in 2015. R&D expenses represented 20.8% of our net sales in 2016 compared to 16.6% in 2015. The increase in R&D expenses was primarily attributable to Nokias Networks business,
amortization of acquired intangible assets and depreciation of acquired property, plant and equipment; and, to a lesser extent, product portfolio integration costs, as well as Group Common and Other, all of which primarily related to the Acquisition
of Alcatel Lucent, in addition to Nokia Technologies.
Nokias Networks business R&D expenses
were EUR 3 691 million in 2016, an increase of EUR 1 953 million, or 112%, compared to EUR 1 738 million in 2015. The increase in Nokias Networks business R&D expenses was primarily attributable
to an increase in headcount, partially offset by operational and synergy savings. Group Common and Other R&D expenses in 2016 were EUR 282 million, an increase of EUR 198 million, compared to EUR 84 million in 2015.
Group Common and Other R&D expenses increased, primarily attributable to Nokia Bell Labs. Nokia Technologies R&D expenses in 2016 were EUR 250 million, an increase of EUR 30 million, or 14%, compared to
EUR 220 million in 2015. The increase in R&D expenses in Nokia Technologies was primarily attributable to the inclusion of Bell Labs patent portfolio costs, resulting from the Acquisition of Alcatel Lucent, and higher
investments in the areas of digital media and digital health. R&D expenses included amortization and depreciation of acquired intangible assets, and property, plant and equipment of EUR 619 million in 2016 compared to
EUR 35 million in 2015, as well as product portfolio integration-related costs of EUR 61 million in 2016.
Our selling, general and
administrative expenses for Continuing operations in 2016 were EUR 3 819 million, an increase of EUR 2 047 million, or 116%, compared to EUR 1 772 million in 2015. Selling, general and administrative expenses
represented 16.2% of our net sales in 2016 compared to 14.2% in 2015. The increase in selling, general and administrative expenses was primarily attributable to Nokias Networks business, amortization of acquired intangible assets and
depreciation of acquired property, plant and equipment, and transaction and integration-related costs and Group Common and Other, all of which primarily related to the Acquisition of Alcatel Lucent, as well as Nokia Technologies.
Nokias Networks business selling, general and administrative expenses were EUR 2 720 million in 2016, an increase of
EUR 1 300 million, or 92%, compared to EUR 1 420 million in 2015. The increase in Nokias Networks business selling, general and administrative expenses was primarily attributable to an increase in headcount,
partially offset by operational and synergy savings. Group Common and Other selling, general and administrative expenses in 2016 were EUR 231 million, an increase of EUR 134 million compared to EUR 97 million in 2015.
Nokia Technologies selling, general and administrative expenses in 2016 were EUR 183 million, an increase of EUR 74 million, or 68%, compared to EUR 109 million in 2015. The increase in Nokia Technologies selling,
general and administrative expenses was primarily attributable to the ramp-up of Digital Health and Digital Media, higher business support costs and increased licensing. Selling, general and administrative expenses included amortization and
depreciation of acquired intangible assets, and property, plant and equipment of EUR 385 million in 2016 compared to EUR 44 million in 2015, as well as transaction and integration-related costs of EUR 294 million
in 2016.
Other income and expenses for Continuing operations in 2016 was a net expense of EUR 833 million, a change of EUR 846 million,
compared to a net income of EUR 13 million in 2015. The change was primarily attributable to higher restructuring and associated charges and, to a lesser extent, the absence of realized gains related to certain investments made
through venture funds. Other income and expenses included restructuring and associated charges of EUR 759 million in 2016 compared to EUR 121 million in 2015.
|
|
|
NOKIA ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 20-F 2016 |
|
45 |
Results of operations continued
Operating loss/profit
Our operating loss for Continuing operations in 2016 was EUR 1 100 million, a change of EUR 2 797 million, compared to an operating
profit of EUR 1 697 million in 2015. The change in operating result was primarily attributable to higher R&D expenses and selling, general and administrative expenses, and a net negative fluctuation in other income and
expenses, partially offset by higher gross profit. Our operating margin in 2016 was negative 4.7% compared to positive 13.6% in 2015.
The following
table sets forth the impact of unallocated items on operating loss/profit:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EURm |
|
2016 |
|
|
2015 |
|
Total segment operating profit(1) |
|
|
2 172 |
|
|
|
1 958 |
|
Amortization and depreciation of acquired intangible assets and property, plant and equipment |
|
|
(1 026 |
) |
|
|
(79 |
) |
Release of acquisition-related fair value adjustments to deferred revenue and inventory |
|
|
(840 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Restructuring and associated charges |
|
|
(774 |
) |
|
|
(123 |
) |
Product portfolio strategy costs |
|
|
(348 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Transaction and related costs, including integration costs relating to the Acquisition of Alcatel
Lucent |
|
|
(295 |
) |
|
|
(99 |
) |
Other |
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
40 |
|
Total operating loss/profit |
|
|
(1 100 |
) |
|
|
1 697 |
|
(1) |
Excludes costs related to the Acquisition of Alcatel Lucent and related integration, goodwill impairment charges, intangible asset amortization and other purchase price fair value adjustments, restructuring and
associated charges and certain other items. |
Financial income and expenses
Financial income and expenses for Continuing operations was a net expense of EUR 287 million in 2016 compared to a net expense of EUR 186 million in 2015, an
increase of EUR 101 million, or 54%. The change in financial income and expenses was primarily attributable to higher interest expenses, including charges of EUR 41 million related to the redemption of Alcatel Lucent bonds,
net interest expenses of EUR 65 million for defined benefit pensions, and impairments of EUR 108 million for certain investments in private funds; partially offset by higher interest income, significantly lower foreign exchange losses
and realized gains from venture fund distributions.
Refer to Liquidity and capital resources below.
Loss/profit before tax
Our loss before tax for
Continuing operations in 2016 was EUR 1 369 million, a change of EUR 2 909 million compared to a profit of EUR 1 540 million in 2015.
Income tax
Income taxes for Continuing operations was a net benefit of EUR 457 million in 2016, a change of EUR 803 million compared to a net expense of EUR
346 million in 2015. In 2016, net income tax benefit was primarily related to two factors. Firstly, we recorded a loss before tax compared to profit before tax in 2015. Secondly, following the completion of the squeeze-out of the remaining
Alcatel Lucent securities, we launched actions to integrate the former Alcatel Lucent and Nokia operating models. In 2016, in connection with these integration activities, we transferred certain intellectual property to our operations in
the United States, recording a tax benefit and additional deferred tax assets of EUR 348 million. In addition, we elected to treat the Acquisition of Alcatel Lucents operations in the United States as an asset purchase for United States tax
purposes. The impact of this election was to utilize or forfeit existing deferred tax assets and record new deferred tax assets with a longer amortization period than the life of those forfeited assets. As a result of this we recorded EUR
91 million additional deferred tax assets in 2016.
Following the acquisition of Alcatel Lucent, we now have a strong presence in three jurisdictions: Finland,
France and the United States, which had an impact on our effective tax rate in 2016. The local corporate tax rate in the United States and France is significantly higher compared to Finland. In addition, we do not recognize deferred tax assets for
tax losses and temporary differences in France as our ability to utilize unrecognized deferred tax assets is currently uncertain. As of December 31, 2016 we have unrecognized deferred tax assets in France of EUR 4.8 billion.
We will continue to make changes in our operating model in 2017 and expect this to have an impact on our effective tax rate in 2017 and going forward (refer
to Note 37, Subsequent events, of our consolidated financial statements included in this annual report on Form 20-F).
Loss/profit
attributable to equity holders of the parent and earnings per share
The loss attributable to equity holders of the parent in 2016 was EUR 766
million, a change of EUR 3 232 million, compared to a profit of EUR 2 466 million in 2015. Continuing operations generated a loss attributable to equity holders of the parent in 2016 of EUR 751 million compared to a profit of EUR
1 192 million in 2015. The change in profit attributable to equity holders of the parent was primarily attributable to the operating loss in 2016, compared to an operating profit in 2015 and, to a lesser extent, a net negative fluctuation in
financial income and expenses, both of which primarily related to the Acquisition of Alcatel Lucent. This was partially offset by an income tax benefit, resulting from the Acquisition of Alcatel Lucent, compared to an income tax expense in 2015. In
addition, the loss attributable to the non-controlling interests was higher, as a result of the Acquisition of Alcatel Lucent. Our total basic EPS in 2016 decreased to negative EUR 0.13 (basic) and negative EUR 0.13 (diluted) compared to
EUR 0.67 (basic) and EUR 0.63 (diluted) in 2015. In 2015, profit for the year included EUR 1 178 million gain on the Sale of the HERE Business recorded in Discontinued operations. From Continuing operations, EPS in 2016 decreased to
negative EUR 0.13 (basic) and negative EUR 0.13 (diluted) compared to EUR 0.32 (basic) and EUR 0.31 (diluted) in 2015.
|
|
|
46 |
|
NOKIA ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 20-F 2016 |
Cost savings program
On April 6, 2016, we launched a new cost savings program, targeting approximately EUR 1 200 million of total annual cost savings to be achieved in
full year 2018. In 2016, we recognized restructuring and associated charges of EUR 750 million related to the cost savings program. Total expected restructuring and associated charges are EUR 1 700 million. In 2016, we had cumulative
restructuring and associated cash outflows of EUR 590 million relating to this cost savings program. We expect the remaining restructuring and associated cash outflows relating to this cost savings program
to be approximately EUR 2 150 million, including EUR 450 million related to previous Nokia and Alcatel Lucent restructuring and cost savings programs.
Carrying value of cash-generating units
The recoverable amounts of our
cash-generating units (CGUs) were based on fair value less costs of disposal that was determined using market participant assumptions based on a discounted cash flow calculation. The cash flow projections used in calculating
the recoverable amounts were based on financial plans approved by management covering an explicit forecast period of five years. Five additional years of cash flow projections subsequent to the explicit forecast period reflect a gradual progression
towards the steady state cash flow projections modeled in the terminal year.
Estimation and judgment are required in determining the components of the
recoverable amount calculation, including the discount rate, the terminal growth rate, estimated revenue growth rates, gross margin and operating margin. The discount rates reflect current
assessments of the time value of money and relevant market risk premiums reflecting risks and uncertainties for which the
future cash flow estimates have not been adjusted. The terminal growth rate assumptions reflect long-term average growth rates for the industry and economies in which our CGUs operate.
We allocated a significant proportion of the goodwill arising from the Acquisition of Alcatel Lucent to the IP/Optical Networks group of CGUs, which is comprised mainly
of businesses acquired in the acquisition. As a result, the fair value of the IP/Optical Networks group of CGUs corresponds closely to its respective carrying amount.
The results of our impairment testing indicate significant headroom for each CGU, except for the IP/Optical Networks group of CGUs, where the recoverable amount exceeds
its carrying amount by approximately EUR 1 200 million. Taken in isolation, the following changes would cause the recoverable amount of IP/Optical Networks group of CGUs to equal its carrying amount:
∎ |
Increase in discount rate from 8.9% to 10.7%. |
∎ |
Reduction in operational profitability in the terminal year by 40%, which is equal to the decrease in the operating profit of EUR 331 million. |
Goodwill amounts to EUR 5 724 million as of December 31, 2016 (EUR 237 million in 2015).
Refer to Note 16, Impairment, of our consolidated financial statements included in this annual report on Form 20-F.
For the year ended December 31, 2015
compared to the year ended December 31, 2014
The following table sets forth selective line items and the percentage of net sales that they represent for
the years indicated.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the year ended December 31 |
|
2015
EURm |
|
|
% of net sales |
|
|
2014
EURm |
|
|
% of net sales |
|
|
Year-on-year change % |
|
Net sales |
|
|
12 499 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
|
|
11 762 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
Cost of sales |
|
|
(6 963 |
) |
|
|
(55.7 |
) |
|
|
(6 774 |
) |
|
|
(57.6 |
) |
|
|
3 |
|
Gross profit |
|
|
5 536 |
|
|
|
44.3 |
|
|
|
4 988 |
|
|
|
42.4 |
|
|
|
11 |
|
Research and development expenses |
|
|
(2 080 |
) |
|
|
(16.6 |
) |
|
|
(1 904 |
) |
|
|
(16.2 |
) |
|
|
9 |
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses |
|
|
(1 772 |
) |
|
|
(14.2 |
) |
|
|
(1 559 |
) |
|
|
(13.3 |
) |
|
|
14 |
|
Other income and expenses |
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
(111 |
) |
|
|
(0.9 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Operating profit |
|
|
1 697 |
|
|
|
13.6 |
|
|
|
1 414 |
|
|
|
12.0 |
|
|
|
20 |
|
Share of results of associated companies and joint ventures |
|
|
29 |
|
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
(12 |
) |
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Financial income and expenses |
|
|
(186 |
) |
|
|
(1.5 |
) |
|
|
(403 |
) |
|
|
(3.4 |
) |
|
|
(54 |
) |
Profit before tax |
|
|
1 540 |
|
|
|
12.3 |
|
|
|
999 |
|
|
|
8.5 |
|
|
|
54 |
|
Income tax (expense)/benefit |
|
|
(346 |
) |
|
|
(2.8 |
) |
|
|
1 719 |
|
|
|
14.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
Profit for the year |
|
|
1 194 |
|
|
|
9.6 |
|
|
|
2 718 |
|
|
|
23.1 |
|
|
|
(56 |
) |
Net sales
Continuing operations net sales in 2015 were EUR 12 499 million, an increase of EUR 737 million, or 6%, compared to EUR 11 762 million in 2014.
The increase in Continuing operations net sales was attributable to higher net sales in both Nokias Networks business and Nokia Technologies. The increase in Nokias Networks business net sales was primarily attributable to an increase in
net sales in Ultra Broadband Networks, partially offset by the absence of non-recurring IPR net sales which benefited full year 2014. The increase in Nokia Technologies net
sales was primarily attributable to non-recurring net sales from existing and new agreements and revenue share related to
previously divested IPR, and IPR divestments; higher IPR licensing income from existing and new licensees related to settled and ongoing arbitrations; as well as Microsoft becoming a more significant intellectual property licensee following the Sale
of the D&S Business. The increase in net sales was partially offset by lower licensing income from certain existing licensees that experienced decreases in handset sales.
|
|
|
NOKIA ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 20-F 2016 |
|
47 |
Results of operations continued
The following table sets forth distribution of net
sales by geographical area for the years indicated.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the year ended December 31 |
|
2015 EURm |
|
|
2014 EURm |
|
|
Year-on-year change
% |
|
Asia-Pacific |
|
|
3 230 |
|
|
|
3 289 |
|
|
|
(2 |
) |
Europe(1) |
|
|
3 813 |
|
|
|
3 493 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
Greater China |
|
|
1 712 |
|
|
|
1 380 |
|
|
|
24 |
|
Latin America |
|
|
973 |
|
|
|
1 009 |
|
|
|
(4 |
) |
Middle East & Africa |
|
|
1 177 |
|
|
|
1 053 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
North America |
|
|
1 594 |
|
|
|
1 538 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
Total |
|
|
12 499 |
|
|
|
11 762 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
(1) |
All Nokia Technologies net sales are allocated to Finland. |
Refer to Results of segmentsNokias
Networks business for the main changes in regional net sales.
Gross margin
Gross margin for Continuing operations in 2015 was 44.3% compared to 42.4% in 2014. The increase in Continuing operations gross margin was primarily attributable to an
increase in Nokia Technologies and Nokias Networks business gross margins, and to a lesser extent to Group Common and Other gross margin. The increase in Nokia Technologies gross margin in 2015 was primarily attributable to higher net
sales. The increase in Nokias Networks business gross margin in 2015 was attributable to a higher gross margin in Ultra Broadband Networks, partially offset by lower gross margin in IP Networks and Applications and the absence of non-recurring
IPR net sales which benefited full year 2014. The increase in Group Common and Other gross margin in 2015 was primarily attributable to lower cost of sales.
Operating expenses
Our R&D expenses for Continuing operations in 2015 were EUR 2 080 million, an increase of EUR
176 million, or 9%, compared to EUR 1 904 million in 2014. R&D expenses represented 16.6% of our net sales in 2015 compared to 16.2% in 2014. The increase in R&D expenses was primarily attributable to higher R&D
expenses in Nokias Networks business and to a lesser extent in Nokia Technologies. The increase in Nokias Networks business R&D expenses in 2015 was primarily attributable to higher personnel expenses and increased
investments in LTE, 5G, small cells and Cloud core, partially offset by continued operational improvements. The increase in Nokia Technologies R&D expenses was primarily attributable to higher investments in Digital Media and technology
incubation, higher patent portfolio costs and higher investments in Digital Health. R&D expenses included amortization of acquired intangible assets of EUR 35 million and transaction-related costs of EUR 1 million in 2015 compared
to EUR 32 million and EUR 13 million in 2014 respectively.
Our selling, general and administrative expenses
for Continuing operations in 2015 were EUR 1 772 million, an increase of EUR 213 million, or 14%, compared to EUR 1 559 million in 2014. Selling, general and administrative expenses represented 14.2% of our net sales in 2015
compared to 13.3% in 2014. The increase in selling, general and administrative expenses was primarily attributable to higher selling, general and administrative expenses in Nokias Networks business, and to a lesser extent in Nokia
Technologies, partially offset by lower selling, general and administrative expenses in Group Common and Other. The increase in Nokias Networks business selling, general and administrative expenses was primarily attributable to higher
personnel expenses, partially offset by a continued focus on cost efficiency. The increase in Nokia Technologies selling, general and administrative expenses was primarily attributable to the ramp-up of new businesses, increased licensing
activities, and higher business support costs. Selling, general and administrative expenses included transaction-related costs of EUR 99 million and amortization of acquired intangible assets of EUR 44 million in 2015 compared to
EUR 29 million and EUR 35 million in 2014 respectively.
Other income and expenses for Continuing operations in 2015 was a net income of
EUR 13 million, an increase of EUR 124 million, compared to a net expense of EUR 111 million in 2014. The increase in other income and expenses was primarily attributable to Group Common and Other, and to a lesser
extent to Nokias Networks business and Nokia Technologies. Group Common and Other other income and expenses in 2015 included net income of approximately EUR 100 million related to realized gains on investments made through
unlisted venture funds. The change in Nokias Networks business other income and expenses in 2015 was primarily attributable to lower costs related to the sale of receivables, lower net indirect tax expenses and the release
of certain doubtful account allowances. Other income and expenses included restructuring and associated charges of EUR 121 million and contractual remediation costs of EUR 5 million in 2015 compared to EUR 57 million and
EUR 31 million in 2014 respectively.
|
|
|
48 |
|
NOKIA ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 20-F 2016 |
Operating profit
Our operating profit for Continuing operations in 2015 was EUR 1 697 million, an increase of EUR 283 million, or 20%, compared to an operating
profit of EUR 1 414 million in 2014. The increase in operating profit was primarily attributable to an increase in operating profit in Nokia Technologies and a lower operating loss from Group Common and Other, partially offset by lower
operating profit in Nokias Networks business. Our operating margin in 2015 was 13.6% compared to 12.0% in 2014.
The following table sets forth the
impact of unallocated items on operating profit:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EURm |
|
2015 |
|
|
2014 |
|
Total segment operating profit(1) |
|
|
1 958 |
|
|
|
1 602 |
|
Restructuring and associated charges |
|
|
(123 |
) |
|
|
(57 |
) |
Transaction and related costs, including integration costs relating to the Acquisition of Alcatel
Lucent |
|
|
(99 |
) |
|
|
(39 |
) |
Amortization of acquired intangible assets |
|
|
(79 |
) |
|
|
(67 |
) |
Other |
|
|
40 |
|
|
|
(25 |
) |
Total operating profit |
|
|
1 697 |
|
|
|
1 414 |
|
(1) |
Excludes costs related to the Acquisition of Alcatel Lucent and related integration, goodwill impairment charges, intangible asset amortization and other purchase price fair value adjustments, restructuring and
associated charges and certain other items. |
Financial income and expenses
Financial income and expenses for Continuing operations was a net expense of EUR 186 million in 2015 compared to a net expense of EUR 403 million in 2014, a
decrease of EUR 217 million, or 54%. The lower net financial expense in 2015 was primarily attributable to the absence of a financial expense of EUR 123 million relating to the redemption of all material Nokias Networks
business borrowings in 2014, and the absence of a non-cash charge of EUR 57 million relating to the repayment of EUR 1 500 million convertible bonds issued to Microsoft.
Refer to Liquidity and capital resources below.
Profit before tax
Our profit before tax for Continuing operations in 2015 was EUR 1 540 million, an increase of EUR 541 million compared to EUR 999 million
in 2014.
Income tax
Income taxes for
Continuing operations were a net expense of EUR 346 million in 2015, a change of EUR 2 065 million compared to a net benefit of EUR 1 719 million in 2014. In 2014, the net income tax benefit was primarily
attributable to the recognition of EUR 2 126 million deferred tax assets following the reassessment of recoverability of tax assets in Finland and Germany.
Profit attributable to equity holders of the parent and earnings per share
Profit attributable to equity holders of the parent in 2015 was EUR 2 466 million, a decrease of EUR 996 million, compared to a profit of EUR 3
462 million in 2014. Continuing operations generated profit attributable to equity holders of the parent in 2015 of EUR 1 192 million compared to a profit of EUR 2 710 million in 2014. Profit attributable to equity
holders of the parent in 2014 was favorably impacted by the recognition of EUR 2 126 million deferred tax assets. Nokia Groups total basic EPS in 2015 decreased to EUR 0.67 (basic) and EUR 0.63 (diluted) compared to
EUR 0.94 (basic) and EUR 0.85 (diluted) in 2014. Profit for the year included EUR 1 178 million gain on the Sale of the HERE Business (EUR 2 803 million gain on the Sale of the D&S Business in 2014)
recorded in Discontinued operations. From Continuing operations, EPS in 2015 decreased to EUR 0.32 (basic) and EUR 0.31 (diluted) compared to EUR 0.73 (basic) and EUR 0.67 (diluted) in 2014.
|
|
|
NOKIA ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 20-F 2016 |
|
49 |
Results of operations continued
Discontinued operations
Background
The two businesses below are presented as Discontinued
operations in this annual report on Form 20-F.
HERE business
We sold our HERE digital mapping and location services business to a German automotive industry consortium comprised of AUDI AG, BMW Group and Daimler AG, that was
completed on December 4, 2015 (the Sale of HERE Business).
The transaction, originally announced on August 3, 2015, valued HERE at an
enterprise value of EUR 2.8 billion, subject to certain purchase price adjustments. We received net proceeds from the transaction of approximately EUR 2.55 billion at the closing of the transaction. We recorded a gain on the Sale of the
HERE Business, including a related release of cumulative foreign exchange translation differences of approximately EUR 1.2 billion, in the year ended December 31, 2015.
Devices & Services business
We sold substantially all of our Devices & Services business to Microsoft in a transaction that was completed on April 25, 2014 (the Sale of
the D&S Business). We granted Microsoft a ten-year non-exclusive license to our patents and patent applications. The announced purchase price of the transaction was EUR 5.44 billion, of which EUR 3.79 billion related to the purchase
of substantially all of the Devices & Services business, and EUR 1.65 billion to the ten-year mutual patent license agreement and the option to extend this agreement into perpetuity. Of the Devices & Services-related assets, our
former CTO organization and our patent portfolio remained within the Nokia Group, and are now part of the Nokia Technologies business group.
For the year ended December 31, 2016
compared to the year ended December 31, 2015
As the Sale of the HERE Business closed on December 4, 2015, the financial results of Discontinued
operations in 2016 are not comparable to the financial results of Discontinued operations in 2015.
The following table sets forth selective line items for the
years indicated.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the year ended December 31 |
|
2016
EURm |
|
|
2015
EURm |
|
Net sales |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 075 |
|
Cost of sales |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(244 |
) |
Gross profit |
|
|
|
|
|
|
831 |
|
Research and development expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(498 |
) |
Selling, general and administrative expenses |
|
|
(11 |
) |
|
|
(213 |
) |
Other income and expenses |
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
(23 |
) |
Operating (loss)/profit |
|
|
(15 |
) |
|
|
97 |
|
Financial income and expenses |
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
(9 |
) |
(Loss)/profit before tax |
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
88 |
|
Income tax (expense)/benefit |
|
|
(28 |
) |
|
|
8 |
|
(Loss)/profit for the year, ordinary activities |
|
|
(29 |
) |
|
|
96 |
|
Gain on the Sale of the HERE and D&S Businesses, net of tax(1) |
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
1 178 |
|
(Loss)/profit for the year |
|
|
(15 |
) |
|
|
1 274 |
|
(1) |
In 2016, an additional gain of EUR 7 million was recognized on the Sale of the HERE Business following the final purchase price settlement, and EUR 7 million on the Sale of the D&S Business due to
a tax indemnification. |
|
|
|
50 |
|
NOKIA ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 20-F 2016 |
Net sales
Discontinued operations did not generate net sales in 2016. In 2015, Discontinued operations net sales were EUR 1 075 million. The decrease was
attributable to the absence of net sales from HERE.
Gross margin
Discontinued operations did not generate gross margin in 2016. In 2015, Discontinued operations gross margin was 77.3% in 2015. The decrease in gross margin was
attributable to the absence of net sales and cost of sales from HERE.
Operating expenses
Discontinued operations operating expenses in 2016 were EUR 15 million, a decrease of EUR 719 million, compared to EUR 734 million in
2015. The decrease was attributable to the absence of operating expenses from HERE.
Operating loss/profit
Discontinued operations operating loss in 2016 was EUR 15 million, a change of EUR 112 million, compared to an operating profit of EUR 97
million in 2015. The change in Discontinued operations operating result was attributable to the absence of net sales and operating expenses from HERE.
Loss/profit for the year
Discontinued operations loss in 2016 was EUR 15 million, a change of EUR 1 289 million
compared to a profit of EUR 1 274 million in 2015. The gain on the Sale of the HERE Business recorded in 2015 was EUR 1 178 million, which included a reclassification of EUR 1 174 million of foreign exchange
differences from other comprehensive income.
For the year ended December 31, 2015
compared to the year ended December 31, 2014
As the Sale of the HERE Business closed on December 4, 2015 and the Sale of the D&S Business closed
on April 25, 2014, the financial results of Discontinued operations in 2015 are not comparable to the financial results of Discontinued operations in 2014.
The following table sets forth selective line items for the years indicated.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the year ended December 31 |
|
2015
EURm |
|
|
2014
EURm |
|
Net sales |
|
|
1 075 |
|
|
|
3 428 |
|
Cost of sales |
|
|
(244 |
) |
|
|
(2 325 |
) |
Gross profit |
|
|
831 |
|
|
|
1 103 |
|
Research and development expenses |
|
|
(498 |
) |
|
|
(899 |
) |
Selling, general and administrative expenses |
|
|
(213 |
) |
|
|
(628 |
) |
Other income and expenses(1) |
|
|
(23 |
) |
|
|
(1 354 |
) |
Operating profit/(loss) |
|
|
97 |
|
|
|
(1 778 |
) |
Financial income and expenses |
|
|
(9 |
) |
|
|
10 |
|
Profit/(loss) before tax |
|
|
88 |
|
|
|
(1 768 |
) |
Income tax benefit/(expense) |
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
(277 |
) |
Profit/(loss) for the year, ordinary activities |
|
|
96 |
|
|
|
(2 045 |
) |
Gain on the Sale of the HERE and D&S Businesses, net of
tax |
|
|
1 178 |
|
|
|
2 803 |
|
Profit for the year |
|
|
1 274 |
|
|
|
758 |
|
(1) |
Includes impairment of goodwill of EUR 1 209 million related to HERE in 2014. |
Net sales
Discontinued operations net sales in 2015 were EUR 1 075 million, a decrease of EUR 2 353 million, or 69%, compared to EUR 3 428 million
in 2014. The decrease was attributable to the absence of net sales from Devices & Services.
Gross margin
Discontinued operations gross margin in 2015 was 77.3%, compared to a gross margin of 32.2% in 2014. The increase in gross margin was attributable to the absence of
cost of sales from Devices & Services.
Operating expenses
Discontinued operations operating expenses in 2015 were EUR 734 million, a decrease of EUR 2 147 million, or 74.5%, compared to EUR 2
881 million in 2014. The decrease was primarily attributable to the absence of a EUR 1 209 million impairment charge related to HERE which negatively affected 2014, and lower operating expenses attributable to Devices & Services.
Operating profit/loss
Discontinued operations operating profit in 2015 was EUR 97 million, an increase of EUR 1 875 million, compared to an operating loss of
EUR 1 778 million in 2014. The change in Discontinued operations operating result was primarily attributable to the absence of a EUR 1 209 million impairment charge related to HERE which negatively affected 2014, and lower
operating expenses attributable to Devices & Services, partially offset by lower gross profit.
Profit for the year
Discontinued operations profit in 2015 was EUR 1 274 million, an increase of EUR 516 million compared to a profit of EUR 758 million
in 2014. The gain on the Sale of the HERE Business recorded in 2015 was EUR 1 178 million, which included a reclassification of EUR 1 174 million of foreign exchange differences from other comprehensive income. The gain
on the Sale of the D&S Business recorded in 2014 was EUR 2 803 million.
|
|
|
NOKIA ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 20-F 2016 |
|
51 |
Results of segments
Networks business
For the
year ended December 31, 2016 compared to the year ended December 31, 2015
The following table sets forth selective line items and the percentage of
net sales for the years indicated.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the year ended December 31 |
|
|
|
|
2016
EURm |
|
|
% of net sales |
|
|
2015
EURm |
|
|
% of net sales |
|
|
Year-on-year change % |
|
Net sales |
|
|
|
|
|
|
21 800 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
|
|
11 487 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
|
|
90 |
|
Cost of sales |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(13 414 |
) |
|
|
(61.5 |
) |
|
|
(7 006 |
) |
|
|
(61.0 |
) |
|
|
91 |
|
Gross profit |
|
|
|
|
|
|
8 386 |
|
|
|
38.5 |
|
|
|
4 481 |
|
|
|
39.0 |
|
|
|
87 |
|
Research and development expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3 691 |
) |
|
|
(16.9 |
) |
|
|
(1 738 |
) |
|
|
(15.1 |
) |
|
|
112 |
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2 720 |
) |
|
|
(12.5 |
) |
|
|
(1 420 |
) |
|
|
(12.4 |
) |
|
|
92 |
|
Other income and expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(40 |
) |
|
|
(0.2 |
) |
|
|
26 |
|
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
Operating profit |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 935 |
|
|
|
8.9 |
|
|
|
1 349 |
|
|
|
11.7 |
|
|
|
43 |
|
Segment information(1)
|
|
For the year ended December 31 |
|
|
Ultra
Broadband Networks
2016
EURm |
(2)
|
|
|
IP Networks and
Applications
2016 EURm |
(3)
|
|
|
Networks total
2016 EURm |
(4)
|
|
|
Ultra Broadband Networks
2015 EURm |
(2)
|
|
|
IP Networks and
Applications
2015 EURm |
(3)
|
|
|
Networks total
2015 EURm |
(4)
|
Net sales |
|
|
15 771 |
|
|
|
6 029 |
|
|
|
21 800 |
|
|
|
10 159 |
|
|
|
1 328 |
|
|
|
11 487 |
|
Cost of sales |
|
|
(10 044 |
) |
|
|
(3 370 |
) |
|
|
(13 414 |
) |
|
|
(6 354 |
) |
|
|
(652 |
) |
|
|
(7 006 |
) |
Gross profit |
|
|
5 727 |
|
|
|
2 659 |
|
|
|
8 386 |
|
|
|
3 805 |
|
|
|
676 |
|
|
|
4 481 |
|
Research and development expenses |
|
|
(2 405 |
) |
|
|
(1 286 |
) |
|
|
(3 691 |
) |
|
|
(1 470 |
) |
|
|
(268 |
) |
|
|
(1 738 |
) |
Selling, general and administrative expenses |
|
|
(1 936 |
) |
|
|
(784 |
) |
|
|
(2 720 |
) |
|
|
(1 146 |
) |
|
|
(274 |
) |
|
|
(1 420 |
) |
Other income and expenses |
|
|
(24 |
) |
|
|
(16 |
) |
|
|
(40 |
) |
|
|
22 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
26 |
|
Operating profit |
|
|
1 362 |
|
|
|
573 |
|
|
|
1 935 |
|
|
|
1 211 |
|
|
|
138 |
|
|
|
1 349 |
|
(1) |
Refer to Note 4, Segment information, of our consolidated financial statements included in this annual report. |
(2) |
Net sales include EUR 13 406 million (EUR 10 023 million in 2015) attributable to Mobile Networks and EUR 2 365 million (EUR 136 million in 2015) attributable to Fixed Networks. |
(3) |
Net sales include EUR 2 940 million (EUR 515 million in 2015) attributable to IP Routing; EUR 1 562 million attributable to Optical Networks; and EUR 1 527 million (EUR 813 million in 2015)
attributable to Applications & Analytics. |
(4) |
Includes Services net sales of EUR 8 531 million (EUR 5 424 million in 2015). |
Net sales
Nokias Networks business net sales in 2016 were EUR 21 800 million, an increase of EUR 10 313 million, or 90%, compared to
EUR 11 487 million in 2016. The increase in Nokias Networks business net sales was primarily attributable to the Acquisition of Alcatel Lucent. Ultra Broadband Networks net sales were EUR 15 771 million in 2016,
an increase of EUR 5 612 million, or 55%, compared to EUR 10 159 million in 2015. IP Networks and Applications net sales were EUR 6 029 million in 2016, an increase of EUR 4 701 million
compared to EUR 1 328 million in 2015.
The increase in Ultra Broadband Networks net sales is comprised of an increase in Mobile Networks
net sales of EUR 3 383 million and an increase in Fixed Networks net sales of EUR 2 229 million. The increase in Mobile Networks net sales was primarily attributable to the Acquisition of Alcatel Lucent, which
drove higher net sales in both Radio Networks and Services. This was partially offset by revenue declines from several key customers in Asia-Pacific and North America due to previous build-outs and investments, as well as adverse market conditions
in Latin America. The increase in Fixed Networks net sales was primarily attributable to the Acquisition of Alcatel Lucent, and increases in Broadband Access, supported by the completion of a large project in Asia-Pacific.
The increase in IP Networks and Applications net sales is comprised of an increase in IP/Optical Networks net sales
of EUR 3 987 million and an increase in Applications & Analytics net sales of EUR 714 million, primarily attributable to the Acquisition of Alcatel Lucent. The increase in IP/Optical Networks net sales was
attributable to an increase in IP Routing net sales of EUR 2 425 million and an increase in Optical Networks net sales of EUR 1 562 million. The increase in Applications & Analytics net sales was primarily
attributable to the Acquisition of Alcatel Lucent, and increases in Services.
The following table sets forth distribution of net sales by geographical area
for the years indicated.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the year ended December 31 |
|
2016 EURm |
|
|
2015 EURm |
|
|
Year-on-year change % |
|
Asia-Pacific |
|
|
4 216 |
|
|
|
3 231 |
|
|
|
30 |
|
Europe |
|
|
4 881 |
|
|
|
2 805 |
|
|
|
74 |
|
Greater China |
|
|
2 640 |
|
|
|
1 710 |
|
|
|
54 |
|
Latin America |
|
|
1 444 |
|
|
|
970 |
|
|
|
49 |
|
Middle East & Africa |
|
|
1 889 |
|
|
|
1 177 |
|
|
|
60 |
|
North America |
|
|
6 730 |
|
|
|
1 594 |
|
|
|
322 |
|
Total |
|
|
21 800 |
|
|
|
11 487 |
|
|
|
90 |
|
|
|
|
52 |
|
NOKIA ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 20-F 2016 |
On a regional basis, Nokias Networks business net sales increased across all regions, with particularly strong
growth in North America and Europe, primarily attributable to the Acquisition of Alcatel Lucent.
The increase in Mobile Networks net sales was driven by the
Acquisition of Alcatel Lucent, resulting in significant improvements in the North America, Greater China, and the Middle East & Africa regions, partially offset by revenue decreases in Asia-Pacific and Latin America. The increase in Fixed
Networks net sales was primarily attributable to the Acquisition of Alcatel Lucent, supported by the completion of a large project in Asia-Pacific, offset by contraction in Europe.
The increases in both IP/Optical Networks net sales and Applications & Analytics net sales were primarily attributable to significant increases in North
America following the Acquisition of Alcatel Lucent.
Gross margin
Nokias Networks business gross margin in 2016 was 38.5%, compared to 39.0% in 2015. The slight decrease in Nokias Networks business gross margin was due to
decreases in both Ultra Broadband Networks gross margin and IP Networks and Applications gross margin. Ultra Broadband Networks gross margin in 2016 was 36.3%, compared to 37.5% in 2015. The decrease in Ultra Broadband Networks gross margin was
primarily attributable to higher central cost of sales in Mobile Networks, partially offset by favorable region and product mix, and the completion of a large Fixed Networks project in the Asia-Pacific region.
IP Networks and Applications gross margin in 2016 was 44.1%, compared to 50.9% in 2015. The decrease in IP Networks and Applications gross margin was primarily
attributable to changes in the business volume and mix, primarily attributable to the Acquisition of Alcatel Lucent.
Operating expenses
Nokias Networks business R&D expenses were EUR 3 691 million in 2016, an increase of EUR 1 953 million, or 112%, compared to
EUR 1 738 million in 2015. The increase in Nokias Networks business R&D expenses was primarily attributable to an increase in headcount attributable to the Acquisition of Alcatel Lucent, partially offset by operational and
synergy savings. The increase in Nokias Networks
business R&D expenses was attributable to both Ultra Broadband Networks and IP Networks and Applications. Ultra
Broadband Networks R&D expenses were EUR 2 405 million in 2016, an increase of EUR 935 million, compared to EUR 1 470 million in 2015. IP Networks and Applications R&D expenses were EUR 1 286 million in
2016, an increase of EUR 1 018 million, compared to EUR 268 million in 2015.
Nokias Networks business selling, general and administrative expenses
were EUR 2 720 million in 2016, an increase of EUR 1 300 million, or 92%, compared to EUR 1 420 million in 2015. The increase in Nokias Networks business selling, general and administrative expenses was primarily
attributable to an increase in headcount attributable to the Acquisition of Alcatel Lucent, partially offset by operational and synergy savings. The increase in Nokias Networks business selling, general and administrative expenses was
attributable to both Ultra Broadband Networks and IP Networks and Applications. Ultra Broadband Networks selling, general and administrative expenses were EUR 1 936 million in 2016, an increase of EUR 790 million, compared to EUR 1
146 million in 2015. IP Networks and Applications selling, general and administrative expenses were EUR 784 million in 2016, an increase of EUR 510 million, compared to EUR 274 million in 2015.
Nokias Networks business other income and expenses was an expense of EUR 40 million in 2016, a change of EUR 66 million compared to an income of EUR
26 million in 2015. The change was attributable to both Ultra Broadband Networks and IP Networks and Applications, primarily related to doubtful accounts allowances.
Operating profit
Nokias Networks
business operating profit was EUR 1 935 million in 2016, an increase of EUR 586 million compared to EUR 1 349 million in 2015. Nokias Networks business operating margin in 2016 was 8.9% compared to 11.7% in 2015.
The decrease in operating margin was primarily attributable to Ultra Broadband Networks. Ultra Broadband Networks operating margin decreased from 11.9% in 2015 to 8.6% in 2016. IP Networks and Applications operating margin decreased from 10.4%
in 2015 to 9.5% in 2016. The decreases in both Ultra Broadband Networks and IP Networks and Applications operating margins in 2016 were attributable to lower gross margin and higher operating expenses.
For the year ended December 31, 2015
compared to the year ended December 31, 2014
The following table sets forth selective line items and the percentage of net sales for the years indicated.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the year ended December 31 |
|
2015
EURm |
|
|
% of net sales |
|
|
2014
EURm |
|
|
% of net sales |
|
|
Year-on-year change % |
|
Net sales |
|
|
11 487 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
|
|
11 144 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
Cost of sales |
|
|
(7 006 |
) |
|
|
(61.0 |
) |
|
|
(6 755 |
) |
|
|
(60.6 |
) |
|
|
4 |
|
Gross profit |
|
|
4 481 |
|
|
|
39.0 |
|
|
|
4 389 |
|
|
|
39.4 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
Research and development expenses |
|
|
(1 738 |
) |
|
|
(15.1 |
) |
|
|
(1 616 |
) |
|
|
(14.5 |
) |
|
|
8 |
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses |
|
|
(1 420 |
) |
|
|
(12.4 |
) |
|
|
(1 296 |
) |
|
|
(11.6 |
) |
|
|
10 |
|
Other income and expenses |
|
|
26 |
|
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
(38 |
) |
|
|
(0.3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Operating profit |
|
|
1 349 |
|
|
|
11.7 |
|
|
|
1 439 |
|
|
|
12.9 |
|
|
|
(6 |
) |
|
|
|
NOKIA ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 20-F 2016 |
|
53 |
Results of segments continued
Segment
information(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the year ended December 31 |
|
|
Ultra Broadband Networks
2015 EURm |
(2)
|
|
|
IP Networks and Applications 2015
EURm |
(3)
|
|
|
Networks total 2015
EURm |
(4)
|
|
|
Ultra Broadband Networks
2014
EURm |
(2)
|
|
|
IP Networks and
Applications
2014 EURm |
(3)
|
|
|
Networks total 2014
EURm |
(4)
|
Net sales |
|
|
10 159 |
|
|
|
1 328 |
|
|
|
11 487 |
|
|
|
9 818 |
|
|
|
1 326 |
|
|
|
11 144 |
|
Cost of sales |
|
|
(6 354 |
) |
|
|
(652 |
) |
|
|
(7 006 |
) |
|
|
(6 119 |
) |
|
|
(636 |
) |
|
|
(6 755 |
) |
Gross profit |
|
|
3 805 |
|
|
|
676 |
|
|
|
4 481 |
|
|
|
3 699 |
|
|
|
690 |
|
|
|
4 389 |
|
Research and development expenses |
|
|
(1 470 |
) |
|
|
(268 |
) |
|
|
(1 738 |
) |
|
|
(1 368 |
) |
|
|
(248 |
) |
|
|
(1 616 |
) |
Selling, general and administrative expenses |
|
|
(1 146 |
) |
|
|
(274 |
) |
|
|
(1 420 |
) |
|
|
(1 053 |
) |
|
|
(243 |
) |
|
|
(1 296 |
) |
Other income and expenses |
|
|
22 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
26 |
|
|
|
(27 |
) |
|
|
(11 |
) |
|
|
(38 |
) |
Operating profit |
|
|
1 211 |
|
|
|
138 |
|
|
|
1 349 |
|
|
|
1 251 |
|
|
|
188 |
|
|
|
1 439 |
|
(1) |
Refer to Note 4, Segment information, of our consolidated financial statements included in this annual report on Form 20-F. |
(2) |
Net sales include EUR 10 023 million (EUR 9 639 million in 2014) attributable to Mobile Networks and EUR 136 million (EUR 179 million in 2014) attributable to Fixed Networks. |
(3) |
Net sales include EUR 515 million (EUR 523 million in 2014) attributable to IP Routing and EUR 813 million (EUR 803 million in 2014) attributable to Applications & Analytics.
|
(4) |
Includes Services net sales of EUR 5 424 million (EUR 5 078 million in 2014). |
Net sales
Nokias Networks business net sales in 2015 were EUR 11 487 million, an increase of EUR 343 million, or 3%, compared to
EUR 11 144 million in 2014. The increase in Nokias Networks business net sales was primarily attributable to an increase in net sales in Ultra Broadband Networks. Ultra Broadband Networks net sales were
EUR 10 159 million in 2015, an increase of EUR 341 million, or 3%, compared to EUR 9 818 million in 2014. IP Networks and Applications net sales in 2015 were EUR 1 328 million, approximately flat
compared to EUR 1 326 million in 2014. Foreign exchange fluctuations had a positive impact on net sales in 2015 compared to 2014.
The following table
sets forth distribution of net sales by geographical area for the years indicated.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the year ended December 31 |
|
2015
EURm |
|
|
2014
EURm |
|
|
Year-on-year change % |
|
Asia-Pacific |
|
|
3 231 |
|
|
|
3 283 |
|
|
|
(2 |
) |
Europe |
|
|
2 805 |
|
|
|
2 910 |
|
|
|
(4 |
) |
Greater China |
|
|
1 710 |
|
|
|
1 374 |
|
|
|
24 |
|
Latin America |
|
|
970 |
|
|
|
1 021 |
|
|
|
(5 |
) |
Middle East & Africa |
|
|
1 177 |
|
|
|
1 052 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
North America |
|
|
1 594 |
|
|
|
1 504 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
Total |
|
|
11 487 |
|
|
|
11 144 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
Nokias Networks business net sales in Greater China increased 24% in 2015 compared to 2014 driven by higher net sales in
both Ultra Broadband Networks and IP Networks and Applications.
In Middle East & Africa, net sales increased 12% in 2015 compared to 2014. The
overall increase in Middle East & Africa was primarily attributable to growth in several countries in the Middle East.
In North America, net sales
increased 6% in 2015 compared to 2014, driven by higher net sales in Ultra Broadband Networks, partially offset by lower net sales in IP Networks and Applications, as well as the absence of non-recurring IPR net sales which benefited 2014.
In Europe, net sales decreased 4% in 2015 compared to 2014. The overall decrease in Europe was primarily attributable to lower net sales in Germany and Russia,
partially offset by growth in the United Kingdom.
In Asia-Pacific, net sales decreased 2% in 2015 compared to 2014. The overall decrease in Asia-Pacific was
primarily attributable to lower net sales in Japan and South Korea, partially offset by growth in India and Myanmar.
In Latin America, net sales decreased 5% in 2015 compared to 2014. The overall decrease in Latin America was primarily
attributable to lower net sales in Brazil, partially offset by growth in Argentina.
Gross margin
Nokias Networks business gross margin in 2015 was 39.0%, compared to 39.4% in 2014. The slight decrease in Nokias Networks business gross margin in 2015 was
primarily attributable to a lower gross margin in IP Networks and Applications and to a lesser extent to a lower gross margin in Ultra Broadband Networks.
Operating expenses
Nokias Networks business R&D expenses were EUR 1 738 million in 2015, an increase
of EUR 122 million, or 8%, compared to EUR 1 616 million in 2014. The increase was primarily attributable to higher personnel expenses and increased investments in LTE, 5G, small cells and Cloud core, partially
offset by continued operational improvements.
Nokias Networks business selling, general and administrative expenses were EUR 1 420 million in
2015, an increase of EUR 124 million, or 10%, compared to EUR 1 296 million in 2014. In 2015, the increase was primarily attributable to higher personnel expenses, partially offset by a continued focus on cost efficiency.
Nokias Networks business other income and expenses was an income of EUR 26 million in 2015 compared to an expense of EUR 38 million
in 2014, a change of EUR 64 million. The change was primarily attributable to the lower costs related to the sale of receivables, lower net indirect tax expenses and the release of certain doubtful account allowances.
Operating profit
Nokias Networks
business operating profit was EUR 1 349 million in 2015, a decrease of EUR 90 million compared to EUR 1 439 million in 2014. Nokias Networks business operating margin in 2015 was 11.7% compared to 12.9% in 2014. The
decrease in operating profit was primarily attributable to lower operating profit in Ultra Broadband Networks and to a lesser extent to IP Networks and Applications.
Ultra Broadband Networks operating profit decreased from EUR 1 251 million in 2014 to EUR 1 211 million in 2015. The decrease in Ultra
Broadband Networks operating profit in 2015 was primarily attributable to higher operating expenses, partially offset by higher gross profit.
IP Networks operating
profit was EUR 138 million in 2015 compared to EUR 188 million in 2014. The decrease in IP Networks and Applications operating profit was primarily attributable to higher operating expenses and to a lesser extent to lower gross
margin.
|
|
|
54 |
|
NOKIA ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 20-F 2016 |
Nokia Technologies
For the year ended December 31, 2016 compared to the year ended December 31, 2015
The following table sets forth selective line items and the percentage of net sales for the years indicated.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the year ended December 31 |
|
2016
EURm |
|
|
% of net sales |
|
|
2015
EURm |
|
|
% of net sales |
|
|
Year-on-year change % |
|
Net sales |
|
|
1 053 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
|
|
1 027 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
Cost of sales |
|
|
(42 |
) |
|
|
(4.0 |
) |
|
|
(7 |
) |
|
|
(0.7 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Gross profit |
|
|
1 011 |
|
|
|
96.0 |
|
|
|
1 020 |
|
|
|
99.3 |
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
Research and development expenses |
|
|
(250 |
) |
|
|
(23.7 |
) |
|
|
(220 |
) |
|
|
(21.4 |
) |
|
|
14 |
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses |
|
|
(183 |
) |
|
|
(17.4 |
) |
|
|
(109 |
) |
|
|
(10.6 |
) |
|
|
68 |
|
Other income and expenses |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
0.7 |
|
|
|
(86 |
) |
Operating profit |
|
|
579 |
|
|
|
55.0 |
|
|
|
698 |
|
|
|
68.0 |
|
|
|
(17 |
) |
Net sales
Nokia Technologies net sales in 2016 were EUR 1 053 million, an increase of EUR 26 million, or 3%, compared to EUR 1 027 million in 2015. The
increase in Nokia Technologies net sales was primarily attributable to higher IPR licensing income and the inclusion of Withings net sales from June 2016 onwards, resulting from the acquisition of Withings, partially offset by the absence of
non-recurring adjustments to accrued net sales from existing and new agreements, and lower licensing income from certain existing licensees.
Gross margin
Nokia Technologies gross margin in
2016 was 96.0%, compared to 99.3% in 2015. The decrease in Nokia Technologies gross margin in 2016 was primarily attributable to new, lower gross margin business in digital health from Withings, and to a lesser extent, digital media.
Operating expenses
Nokia Technologies R&D
expenses in 2016 were EUR 250 million, an increase of EUR 30 million, or 14%, compared to EUR 220 million in 2015. The increase in R&D expenses in Nokia Technologies was primarily attributable to the inclusion of Bell
Labs patent portfolio costs, resulting from the Acquisition of Alcatel Lucent, and higher investments in the areas of digital media and digital health.
The higher R&D expenses in Digital Health were primarily attributable to the inclusion of Withings
R&D expenses from June 2016. This was partially offset by the focusing of general research investments towards more specific opportunities.
Nokia
Technologies selling, general and administrative expenses in 2016 were EUR 183 million, an increase of EUR 74 million, or 68%, compared to EUR 109 million in 2015. The increase in Nokia Technologies selling, general and
administrative expenses was primarily attributable to the ramp-up of Digital Health and Digital Media, higher business support costs and increased licensing activity. The higher selling, general and administrative expenses in Digital Health were
primarily attributable to the inclusion of Withings selling, general and administrative expenses from June 2016.
Nokia Technologies other income and expense
in 2016 was a net income of EUR 1 million, a decrease of EUR 6 million compared to a net income of EUR 7 million in 2015.
Operating profit
Nokia Technologies operating profit in 2016 was EUR 579 million, a decrease of EUR 119 million, or
17%, compared to an operating profit of EUR 698 million in 2015. The decrease in Nokia Technologies operating profit was primarily attributable to higher selling, general and administrative and R&D expenses. Nokia Technologies operating
margin in 2016 was 55.0% compared to 68.0% in 2015.
For the year ended December 31, 2015
compared to the year ended December 31, 2014
The following table sets forth selective line items and the percentage of net sales for the years indicated.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the year ended December 31 |
|
2015
EURm |
|
|
% of net sales |
|
|
2014
EURm |
|
|
% of net sales |
|
|
Year-on-year change % |
|
Net sales |
|
|
1 027 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
|
|
632 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
|
|
63 |
|
Cost of sales |
|
|
(7 |
) |
|
|
(0.7 |
) |
|
|
(8 |
) |
|
|
(1.3 |
) |
|
|
(13 |
) |
Gross profit |
|
|
1 020 |
|
|
|
99.3 |
|
|
|
624 |
|
|
|
98.7 |
|
|
|
63 |
|
Research and development expenses |
|
|
(220 |
) |
|
|
(21.4 |
) |
|
|
(170 |
) |
|
|
(26.9 |
) |
|
|
29 |
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses |
|
|
(109 |
) |
|
|
(10.6 |
) |
|
|
(64 |
) |
|
|
(10.1 |
) |
|
|
70 |
|
Other income and expenses |
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
0.7 |
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
(0.2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Operating profit |
|
|
698 |
|
|
|
68.0 |
|
|
|
389 |
|
|
|
61.6 |
|
|
|
79 |
|
Net sales
Nokia Technologies net sales in 2015 were EUR 1 027 million, an increase of EUR 395 million, or 63%, compared to EUR 632 million in 2014. The
increase in Nokia Technologies net sales was primarily attributable to two factors. Firstly, approximately EUR 310 million of Nokia Technologies net sales in 2015 related to non-recurring net sales from existing and new agreements, and
revenue share related to previously divested IPR and IPR divestments. Secondly, approximately
EUR 130 million of Nokia Technologies net sales in 2015 related to higher IPR licensing income from existing and new
licensees, related to settled and ongoing arbitrations, as well as Microsoft becoming a more significant intellectual property licensee following the Sale of the D&S Business. The increase in net sales was partially offset by lower
licensing income from certain existing licensees that experienced decreases in handset sales.
|
|
|
NOKIA ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 20-F 2016 |
|
55 |
Results of segments continued
Gross margin
Nokia Technologies gross margin in 2015 was 99.3%, compared to 98.7% in 2014. The increase in Nokia Technologies gross margin in 2015 was primarily attributable to higher
net sales.
Operating expenses
Nokia
Technologies R&D expenses in 2015 were EUR 220 million, an increase of EUR 50 million, or 29%, compared to EUR 170 million in 2014. The increase in R&D expenses was primarily attributable to higher
investments in Digital Media and technology incubation, higher patent portfolio costs, and higher investments in digital health.
Nokia Technologies selling,
general and administrative expenses in 2015 were EUR 109 million, an increase of EUR 45 million, or 70%, compared to EUR 64 million in 2014. The increase in selling, general and administrative expenses was primarily attributable to
the ramp-up of new businesses, increased licensing activities, and higher business support costs.
Nokia Technologies other income and expense in 2015 was a net
income of EUR 7 million, a change of EUR 8 million compared to a net expense of EUR 1 million in 2014.
Operating profit
Nokia Technologies operating
profit in 2015 was EUR 698 million, an increase of EUR 309 million, or 79%, compared to an operating profit of EUR 389 million in 2014. The increase in operating profit was attributable to higher gross profit, partially
offset by higher operating expenses. Nokia Technologies operating margin in 2015 was 68.0% compared to 61.6% in 2014.
Group Common and Other
For the year ended December 31, 2016 compared to the year ended December 31, 2015
The following table sets forth selective line items for the years indicated.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the year ended December 31 |
|
2016
EURm |
|
|
2015
EURm |
|
Net sales |
|
|
1 145 |
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of sales |
|
|
(953 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Gross profit |
|
|
192 |
|
|
|
|
|
Research and development expenses |
|
|
(282 |
) |
|
|
(84 |
) |
Selling, general and administrative expenses |
|
|
(231 |
) |
|
|
(97 |
) |
Other income and expenses |
|
|
(21 |
) |
|
|
92 |
|
Operating loss |
|
|
(342 |
) |
|
|
(89 |
) |
Net sales
Group Common and Other net sales in 2016 were EUR 1 145 million, an increase of EUR 1 145 million, compared to approximately zero in 2015.
The increase in Group Common and Other net sales was primarily due to ASN and RFS net sales, both of which related to the Acquisition of Alcatel Lucent.
Gross margin
Group Common and Other gross margin in 2016 was 16.8%. The Group Common and Other gross margin was attributable to
gross margin in ASN and RFS, both of which related to the Acquisition of Alcatel Lucent.
Operating expenses
Group Common and Other R&D expenses in 2016 were EUR 282 million, an increase of EUR 198 million, compared to EUR 84 million in 2015.
Group Common and Other R&D expenses increased, primarily attributable to Nokia Bell Labs, related to the Acquisition of Alcatel Lucent.
Group Common and
Other selling, general and administrative expenses in 2016 were EUR 231 million, an increase of EUR 134 million compared to EUR 97 million in 2015. The increase in Group Common and Other selling, general and administrative
expenses was primarily attributable to higher central function costs, related to the Acquisition of Alcatel Lucent.
Group Common and Other other income and expense
in 2016 was a net expense of EUR 21 million, a change of EUR 113 million compared to a net income of EUR 92 million in 2015. The change was primarily attributable to the absence of realized gains related to certain
investments made through venture funds and the non-cash impairment of certain financial assets.
Operating loss
Group Common and Other operating loss in 2016 was EUR 342 million, an increase of EUR 253 million, compared to an operating loss of
EUR 89 million in 2015. The increase in Group Common and Other operating loss was primarily attributable to higher R&D and selling, general and administrative expenses and a net negative fluctuation in other income and expenses,
partially offset by higher gross profit.
For the year ended December 31, 2015 compared to the year ended December 31, 2014
The following table sets forth selective line items for the years indicated.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the year ended December 31 |
|
2015
EURm |
|
|
2014
EURm |
|
Net sales |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
Cost of sales |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(27 |
) |
Gross profit |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(26 |
) |
Research and development expenses |
|
|
(84 |
) |
|
|
(73 |
) |
Selling, general and administrative expenses |
|
|
(97 |
) |
|
|
(132 |
) |
Other income and expenses |
|
|
92 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
Operating loss |
|
|
(89 |
) |
|
|
(226 |
) |
Group Common and Other operating loss in 2015 was EUR 89 million, a decrease of EUR 137 million, or 61%, compared to an
operating loss of EUR 226 million in 2014. The decrease in Group Common and Other operating loss was primarily attributable to change in other income and expense and to a lesser extent to decrease in selling, general
and administrative expenses, partially offset by an increase in R&D expenses. Other income and expense in 2015 included net income of approximately EUR 100 million related to investments made through unlisted venture funds, a
significant portion of which resulted from Nokia Growth Partners selling its holdings in Ganji.com to 58.com for a combination of cash and shares.
|
|
|
56 |
|
NOKIA ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 20-F 2016 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liquidity and
capital resources |
|
|
Financial position
As of December 31, 2016, our total cash and other liquid assets (defined as cash and cash equivalents; current available-for-sale investments, liquid assets; and
investments at fair value through profit and loss, liquid assets) equaled EUR 9 326 million, a decrease of EUR 523 million, compared to EUR 9 849 million as of December 31, 2015. The decrease was attributable to
EUR 1 454 million negative cash flow from operating activities, and shareholder distributions including payment of dividends of EUR 1 515 million and repurchases of shares of EUR 216 million. Total cash and
other liquid assets also decreased by EUR 3 360 million comprising EUR 2 168 million cash used for repayment of long-term borrowings and EUR 1 192 million cash used for purchase of Alcatel Lucent
shares and convertible bonds. Our total cash and other liquid assets also decreased due to capital expenditures of EUR 477 million and cash flows related to acquisitions of EUR 342 million, excluding the Acquisition of
Alcatel Lucent. This decrease was partially offset by an increase of EUR 6 558 million related to the acquired cash and other liquid assets of Alcatel Lucent and other net cash inflows relating to investing and financing
activities. As of December 31, 2014, our total cash and other liquid assets equaled EUR 7 715 million.
As of December 31, 2016, our net cash and
other liquid assets (defined as total cash and other liquid assets less long-term interest-bearing liabilities and short-term borrowings) equaled EUR 5 299 million, a decrease of EUR 2 476 million, compared to
EUR 7 775 million as of December 31, 2015. The decrease was primarily attributable to EUR 1 454 million negative cash flow from operating activities, shareholder distributions including payment of dividends of EUR
1 515 million and repurchases of shares of EUR 216 million and EUR 729 million net cash impact arising from the purchase of Alcatel Lucent shares and convertible bonds. The acquisition of Alcatel Lucent increased net cash by
EUR 1 970 million comprised of EUR 6 558 million in acquired cash and other liquid assets and EUR 4 588 million related to long-term interest-bearing liabilities and short-term borrowings. As of December 31,
2014, our net cash and other liquid assets equaled EUR 5 023 million.
As of December 31, 2016, our cash and cash equivalents equaled
EUR 7 497 million, an increase of EUR 502 million compared to EUR 6 995 million as of December 31, 2015. As of December 31, 2014, our cash and cash equivalents equaled EUR 5 170 million.
Cash flow
2016
Our cash outflow from operating activities in 2016 of
EUR 1 454 million decreased by EUR 1 957 million compared to a cash inflow of EUR 503 million in 2015. The decrease was primarily attributable to a EUR 2 207 million increase in net working capital in 2016
compared to a EUR 1 377 million increase in 2015 and a decrease in net profit, adjusted for non-cash items of EUR 727 million. The primary driver for the increase in net working capital related to a decrease in liabilities of
EUR 2 758 million in 2016 compared to a decrease of EUR 990 million in 2015, partially offset by a decrease in inventories of EUR 533 million in 2016 compared to a decrease of EUR 341 million in 2015. The
decrease in liabilities mainly related to restructuring cash outflows, reductions in liabilities related to our actions to harmonize working capital processes and practices, termination of Alcatel Lucents license agreement with Qualcomm, the
payment of incentives related to Alcatel Lucents and Nokias strong business performance in 2015 and the impact of foreign exchange fluctuations.
The
decrease in cash flow from operating activities was also attributable to a EUR 400 million increase in cash outflows related to net interest and income taxes paid in 2016 and 2015 of EUR 727 million and EUR 327 million,
respectively. Interest paid includes cash outflows from the premium paid for the redemption of Alcatel Lucent bonds and notes related to our capital structure optimization program. Income taxes paid include a non-recurring tax payment due to
the integration of the former Alcatel Lucent and former Nokia operating models into one combined operating model.
In 2016, our cash inflow from investing
activities equaled EUR 6 836 million, representing an increase of EUR 4 940 million compared to EUR 1 896 million cash inflow from investing activities in 2015. The increase in cash inflow from investing
activities was primarily driven by cash and cash equivalents acquired as part of the Acquisition of Alcatel Lucent and an increase in proceeds from maturities and sale of current available-for-sale investments, liquid assets partially
offset by purchase of current available-for-sale investments and liquid assets.
In 2016, our capital expenditure equaled EUR 477 million, an
increase of EUR 163 million, as compared to EUR 314 million in 2015. Major items of capital expenditure in 2016 included investments in R&D equipment, test equipment, hardware for Telco and Cloud environment, plants,
buildings and construction for transformation projects, repair or improvements of sites as well as intangible rights.
In 2016, our cash outflow from financing
activities of EUR 4 923 million increased by EUR 4 343 million in comparison to our cash outflow of EUR 580 million in 2015. The increase in cash outflows was primarily driven by the repayment of long-term
borrowings of EUR 2 599 million mainly including the redemption of Alcatel Lucent bonds and notes related to our capital structure optimization program, paid dividends of EUR 1 515 million primarily related to the
payment of the ordinary and special dividends, purchase of equity instruments of subsidiaries of EUR 724 million related to the purchase of Alcatel Lucent shares and the equity component of the purchased Alcatel Lucent convertible bonds
and EUR 216 million cash outflow related to the commencement of Nokias share repurchasing program.
|
|
|
NOKIA ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 20-F 2016 |
|
57 |
Liquidity and capital resources continued
2015
Our cash inflow from
operating activities in 2015 of EUR 503 million decreased by EUR 772 million compared to the cash inflow of EUR 1 275 million in 2014. The decrease was primarily attributable to EUR 1 377 million cash being tied up in
net working capital in 2015 compared to EUR 988 million cash release in 2014, partially offset by an increase in net profit, adjusted for non-cash items of EUR 993 million. The primary drivers of the increase in net working
capital were higher accounts receivables, mainly relating to the Samsung patent license receivables and lower accounts payable.
In 2015, our cash inflow of
operating activities also included cash outflows of EUR 327 million related to net interests and taxes paid, a decrease of EUR 600 million compared to EUR 927 million cash outflows in 2014. The decrease was primarily attributable
to lower net income taxes paid. Paid taxes in 2014 included approximately EUR 300 million cash outflows relating to Discontinued operations.
In 2015, our
cash flow from investing activities equaled EUR 1 896 million, an increase of EUR 1 010 million compared to EUR 886 million cash received from investing activities in 2014. Cash inflow from investing activities was
primarily driven by gross proceeds attributable to the Sale of the HERE Business of approximately EUR 2 540 million, and the increase in proceeds from maturities and sale of current available-for-sale investments and liquid assets. The
increase was partially offset by an increase in purchases of current available-for-sale investments, liquid assets, purchases of investments at fair value through profit and loss, liquid assets and cash outflows related to capital
expenditure of EUR 314 million and acquisitions of EUR 98 million.
In 2015, our capital expenditure equaled EUR 314 million, an increase of EUR
3 million compared to EUR 311 million in 2014. Major items of capital expenditure in 2015 included investments in production lines, test equipment and computer hardware used primarily in R&D, office and manufacturing facilities as well
as services and software-related intangible assets.
In 2015, our cash outflow from financing activities equaled EUR 580 million, a decrease of EUR 3
996 million compared to EUR 4 576 million cash outflow in 2014. Cash outflows from financing activities were primarily attributable to the payment of EUR 0.14 per share in dividends equaling EUR 507 million and EUR
173 million in cash outflows relating to share repurchases. Cash outflows from financing activities also included payments to non-controlling interest holders to acquire subsidiary shares and pay dividends equaling EUR 57 million.
Financial assets and debt
As of December 31, 2016, our net cash and other liquid assets equaled EUR 5 299 million and consisted of EUR 9 326 million in total
cash and other liquid assets and EUR 4 027 million of long-term interest-bearing liabilities and short-term borrowings.
We hold our cash and other
liquid assets predominantly in euro. Our liquid assets are mainly invested in high-quality money-market and fixed income instruments with strict maturity limits. We also have a EUR 1 579 million undrawn revolving credit
facility available for liquidity purposes.
Our interest-bearing liabilities consisted of a EUR 500 million bond due in 2019, a USD 1 000
million bond due in 2019, a USD 300 million bond due in 2028, a USD 1 360 million bond due in 2029, a USD 500 million bond due in 2039 and EUR 464 million of other liabilities. The bonds maturing in
2019 and 2039 are issued by Nokia Corporation, while the bonds maturing in 2028 and 2029 are issued by Lucent Technologies Inc., (the predecessor to Alcatel-Lucent USA Inc., Nokias wholly-owned subsidiary). Refer to Note 23,
Interest-bearing liabilities, of our consolidated financial statements included in this annual report on Form 20-F for further information regarding our interest-bearing liabilities.
In June 2016, we exercised our options to increase the size of our EUR 1 500 million revolving credit facility to EUR 1 579 million and to
extend the maturity date from June 2018 to June 2019. The facility has a one-year extension option remaining, no financial covenants and it remains undrawn.
In January 2016, Alcatel Lucent SA repaid its EUR 190 million 8.50% senior notes. In February, 2016, Alcatel-Lucent USA Inc. redeemed its USD 650 million
4.625% notes due in July 2017, USD 500 million 8.875% notes due in January 2020 and USD 700 million 6.750% notes due in November 2020 in accordance with their respective terms and conditions. In February 2016, Alcatel Lucent SA
terminated its EUR 504 million revolving credit facility. In March 2016, ASNs EUR 74 million credit facility was repaid.
As part of the public
exchange offer to acquire Alcatel Lucent 2018 OCEANE, 2019 OCEANE and 2020 OCEANE convertible bonds with nominal amounts of EUR 381 million, EUR 238 million and EUR 293 million respectively, were tendered for exchange into Nokia
shares. As a result, less than 15% of the 2018 OCEANE convertible bonds remained outstanding, and the Group caused Alcatel Lucent SA to redeem at par value plus accrued interest all of the outstanding 2018 OCEANE convertible bonds pursuant to
the terms and conditions of the bonds. Subsequently during 2016 the remaining outstanding 2019 OCEANE and 2020 OCEANE convertible bonds with nominal amounts of EUR 402 million and EUR 136 million respectively, were either put back,
acquired in privately negotiated transactions, or acquired through the public buy-out offer followed by a squeeze-out for an aggregate cash payment of EUR 562 million. Refer to Note 31, Notes to the consolidated statement of cash flows and Note
23, Interest-bearing liabilities, of our consolidated financial statements included in this annual report on Form 20-F for further information regarding these transactions.
|
|
|
58 |
|
NOKIA ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 20-F 2016 |
We believe, with EUR 9 326 million of cash
and other liquid assets as well as a EUR 1 579 million revolving credit facility, that we have sufficient funds available to satisfy our future working capital needs, capital expenditures, R&D investments, acquisitions and debt service
requirements at least through 2017. We further believe, with our current credit ratings of BB+ by Standard & Poors and Ba1 by Moodys, that we have access to the capital markets should any funding needs arise in 2017.
We aim to re-establish our investment grade credit rating.
Off-balance
sheet arrangements
There are no material off-balance sheet arrangements that have or are reasonably likely to have a current or future effect on our
financial condition, changes in financial condition, revenues or expenses, results of operations, liquidity, capital expenditures or capital resources that are material to investors, except for purchase obligations and leasing commitments, as well
as guarantees and financing commitments as disclosed in Note 30, Commitments and contingencies, of our consolidated financial statements included in this annual report on Form 20-F.
Capital structure optimization program
In 2015, we announced a two-year, EUR 7 billion program to optimize the efficiency of our capital structure (our capital structure optimization
program). The capital structure optimization program was initially subject to the closing of the Acquisition of Alcatel Lucent and the Sale of the HERE Business, as well as the conversion of all Nokia and Alcatel Lucent OCEANE convertible
bonds. The Sale of the HERE business closed in December 2015. The result of the successful offer for Alcatel Lucent securities was announced on January 5, 2016 and 100% ownership was reached on November 2, 2016. However, not all
convertible bonds were converted.
As of December 31, 2016, we have completed the following shareholder distributions as part of our capital structure
optimization program:
∎ |
ordinary dividend for 2015 of EUR 0.16 per share, totaling EUR 924 million, paid in July 2016; |
∎ |
special dividend of EUR 0.10 per share, totaling EUR 577 million, paid in July 2016; |
∎ |
on October 27, 2016, the originally intended EUR 1.5 billion share repurchase program was adjusted to EUR 1.0 billion, after we had used approximately EUR 560 million in cash during 2016 to acquire Alcatel
Lucent securities in order to reach the 95% squeeze-out threshold. We consider these acquisitions as indirect share repurchases, and thus, part of the initially planned EUR 1.5 billion share repurchase program; |
∎ |
on November 16, 2016, we commenced our share repurchase program up to an equivalent amount of EUR 1.0 billion or a maximum of 575 million shares. Thereafter, in 2016, EUR 216 million was used for
share repurchases under the program; and |
∎ |
between January 1, 2017 and March 10, 2017, EUR 159 million was used for share repurchases under the program.
|
Our capital structure optimization program further
included a part to de-leverage by approximately EUR 3 billion. In 2016, we took the following actions to reach our target:
∎ |
Alcatel Lucent SA repaid its EUR 190 million 8.50% senior notes and terminated its EUR 504 million revolving credit facility; |
∎ |
Alcatel-Lucent USA Inc., a subsidiary of Alcatel Lucent SA, redeemed its USD 650 million 4.625% notes due in July 2017, USD 500 million 8.875% notes due in January 2020 and USD 700 million 6.750% notes
due in November 2020 in accordance with their respective terms and conditions; and |
∎ |
approximately EUR 1.0 billion reduction in the sale of receivables (debt-like items). |
We intend to execute the
following shareholder distributions during 2017 to complete the capital structure optimization program:
∎ |
ordinary dividend for 2016 of EUR 0.17 per share, subject to shareholder approval at the Annual General Meeting on May 23, 2017; and |
∎ |
continue the share repurchase program until we have reached the threshold of EUR 1.0 billion, or acquired the maximum allowed 575 million shares. |
Refer to Dividend below for the Boards dividend proposal for 2016.
|
|
|
NOKIA ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 20-F 2016 |
|
59 |
Liquidity and capital resources continued
Structured finance
Structured finance includes customer financing and other third-party financing. Network operators occasionally require their suppliers, including us, to arrange,
facilitate or provide long-term financing as a condition for obtaining infrastructure projects.
As of December 31, 2016, our total customer
financing, outstanding and committed, equaled EUR 352 million, an increase of EUR 139 million as compared to EUR 213 million in 2015. As of December 31, 2014, our total customer financing, outstanding and committed,
equaled EUR 156 million. Customer financing primarily consisted of financing commitments to network operators.
Refer to Note 36, Risk management, of our
consolidated financial statements included in this annual report on Form 20-F for further information relating to our committed and outstanding customer financing.
We expect our customer financing commitments to be financed mainly from cash and other liquid assets and through cash flow from operations.
As of December 31, 2016, guarantees of our performance consisted of bank guarantees given on behalf of Nokia to its customers for EUR 1 805 million (EUR
400 million as of December 31, 2015). In addition, Nokia Corporation issued corporate guarantees directly to Nokia customers with primary obligation for EUR 88 million (EUR 74 million as of December 31, 2015) and
such corporate guarantees issued by certain Alcatel Lucent entities for EUR 1 520 million. These instruments entitle the customer to claim payments as compensation for non-performance by Nokia of its obligations under network infrastructure
supply agreements. Depending on the nature of the instrument, compensation is either payable on demand, or is subject to verification of non-performance. Due to certain differences in the business and a less centralized guarantee process, bank
guarantees as well as corporate guarantees with primary obligation were used to a larger extent by Alcatel Lucent.
Financial guarantees and securities pledged that
we may give on behalf of customers, represent guarantees relating to payment by certain Nokia customers and other third parties under specified loan facilities between such customers or other third parties and their creditors. Our obligations under
such guarantees are released upon the earlier of expiration of the guarantee or early payment by the customer or other third party.
Refer to Note 30, Commitments
and contingencies, of our consolidated financial statements included in this annual report on Form 20-F for further information regarding commitments and contingencies.
Venture fund investments and commitments
We make financing commitments to a number of unlisted venture funds that make technology-related investments. The majority of the investments are managed by Nokia
Growth Partners which specializes in growth-stage investing, seeking companies that are changing the face of mobility and connectivity.
As of
December 31, 2016, our unlisted venture fund investments equaled EUR 819 million, as compared to EUR 953 million as of December 31, 2015. Refer to Note 24, Fair value of financial instruments, of our consolidated financial
statements included in this annual report on Form 20-F for further information regarding fair value of our unlisted venture fund investments.
As of
December 31, 2016, our venture fund commitments equaled EUR 525 million, as compared to EUR 230 million as of December 31, 2015. As a limited partner in venture funds, we are committed to capital contributions and entitled to
cash distributions according to the respective partnership agreements and underlying fund activities. Refer to Note 30, Commitments and contingencies, of our consolidated financial statements included in this annual report on Form
20-F for further information regarding commitments and contingencies.
Treasury policy
Treasury activities are governed by the Nokia Treasury Policy approved by the President and CEO and supplemented by operating procedures approved by the CFO, covering
specific areas such as foreign exchange risk, interest rate risk, credit and liquidity risk. The objective of treasurys liquidity and capital structure management activities is to ensure that the Group has sufficient liquidity to go through
unfavorable periods without being severely constrained by the availability of funds to execute its business plans and implement its long-term business strategy. We are risk-averse in our treasury activities.
|
|
|
60 |
|
NOKIA ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 20-F 2016 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Material
subsequent events |
|
|
After December 31, 2016, the following material events have taken place.
∎ |
In January 2017, as part of continuing changes to our operating model, we transferred certain intellectual property between our operations in Finland and the United States, which is expected to result in an
approximately EUR 250 million negative non-recurring impact on tax expense in the first quarter of 2017, but no material cash tax outflow. |
∎ |
On January 31, 2017, we acquired 100% ownership interest in Deepfield Networks Inc., a United States-based leader in real-time analytics for IP network performance management and security. |
∎ |
On February 8, 2017, we entered into a transaction agreement with Comptel Corporation (Comptel), a Finnish publicly listed company, whereby we undertake to make a voluntary public cash tender offer to
purchase all of the issued and outstanding shares and option rights in Comptel that are not owned by Comptel or any of its subsidiaries. The price offered for each share validly tendered in the tender offer will be EUR 3.04 in cash. The
tender offer values Comptel at approximately EUR 347 million, on a fully diluted basis. |
∎ |
On February 22, 2017, we announced that we had commenced a tender offer to purchase the outstanding EUR 500 million 6.75% notes due February 4, 2019 issued by Nokia Corporation
(the 2019 Euro Notes) and the outstanding USD 300 million 6.50% notes due January 15, 2028 (the 2028 Dollar Notes) and USD 1 360 million 6.45% notes due March 15, 2029 (the 2029 Dollar
Notes) issued by Lucent Technologies Inc., (the predecessor to Alcatel-Lucent USA Inc., Nokias wholly-owned subsidiary) up to a maximum cash consideration of USD 1 000 million (the Tender Offer). The purpose of
the Tender Offer is to manage our overall indebtedness. Following the settlement of the Tender Offer, we expect to cancel any euro-denominated notes purchased pursuant to the Tender Offer and to hold any U.S. dollar-denominated notes. On
March 21, 2017, the Tender Offer expired. We received tenders for 53.76% (EUR 268.8 million) of the 2019 Euro Notes, 28.66% (USD 86.0 million) of the 2028 Dollar Notes and 29.48% (USD 400.9 million) of the 2029 Dollar Notes. We expect to settle
the Tender Offer on March 23, 2017. |
∎ |
On March 15, 2017, we issued EUR 500 million 1.00% Senior Notes due 2021 and EUR 750 million 2.00% Senior Notes due 2024 under our 5 000 000 000 Euro Medium-Term Note Programme. The proceeds of
the new notes are intended to fund the Tender Offer, and for general corporate purposes.
|
On March 17, 2017, we announced changes in our organizational structure and Group Leadership Team, effective from
April 1, 2017.
The organizational changes include the separation of our current Mobile Networks business group into two distinct, but closely linked,
organizations: (1) Mobile Networks, focused on products and solutions and (2) Global Services, focused on services. In addition, our Chief Innovation and Operating Officer (CIOO) organization will be split, with its current
operating activities moved to a newly-appointed Chief Operating Officer (COO) organization, innovation activities to our Chief Technology Officer and incubation to our Chief Strategy Officer.
The leadership changes include the following:
∎ |
Marc Rouanne, currently Chief Innovation and Operating Officer, will become President of the Mobile Networks business group. |
∎ |
Igor Leprince, currently Executive Vice President of Global Services, will join the Group Leadership Team and assume the role of President of Global Services, a new business group comprised of the Services
organization that currently resides within the existing Mobile Networks business group. |
∎ |
Monika Maurer, currently Chief Operating Officer of Fixed Networks, will join the Group Leadership Team and assume the role of Group COO, responsible for Nokias operating model, Global Operations (manufacturing
and supply chain), procurement, implementation of cost saving and ongoing transformation activities, information technology, real estate, and quality. |
∎ |
Marcus Weldon, currently President of Nokia Bell Labs and Chief Technology Officer, will join the Group Leadership Team and retain current responsibilities. |
∎ |
Kathrin Buvac, Chief Strategy Officer, will assume additional responsibilities for incubation of select new business opportunities, and Barry French, Chief Marketing Officer, will assume additional responsibilities for
Health, Safety, Security and Environment. |
∎ |
Samih Elhage will continue in his current role and as a member of the Group Leadership Team until April 1, 2017, and will remain as an advisor to the company through May 31, 2017. |
We will continue to report financial information for Ultra Broadband Networks, IP Networks and Applications and Nokia Technologies. Ultra Broadband Networks will
be composed of the Mobile Networks, Global Services and Fixed Networks business groups. IP Networks and Applications is composed of the IP/Optical Networks and Applications & Analytics business groups.
|
|
|
NOKIA ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 20-F 2016 |
|
61 |
Sustainability and
corporate responsibility
We are shaping the future of technology to transform the
human experience and improve peoples lives and we aim to achieve that by conducting our business in a responsible manner. We align with globally recognized ethical and responsible business practices and frameworks, putting in place
the processes, policies and programs to achieve our aim.
Managing sustainability
Our Sustainability vision and priorities
Our sustainability vision remained
unchanged in 2016to design technologies that enable the human possibilities of the connected world while making it more productive, healthy and sustainable. We drive this through the following renewed priorities: improving peoples lives
with technology, protecting the environment, conducting our business with integrity and respecting our people.
Sustainability and corporate responsibility issues
are reviewed regularly at all levels within Nokia, including by the Nokia Board of Directors (the Board). Our sustainability strategy and governance were realigned to our renewed strategy and business focus and new governance was
implemented in 2016.
Sustainability performance and materiality assessment
In 2016, we reviewed and updated our materiality analysis whereby we systematically analyzed stakeholder requirements, our influence on sustainable development
throughout the value chain, industry cooperation and the UNs Sustainable Development Goals. In total, we evaluated more than 40 sustainability issues that affect our short, medium, and long-term corporate strategy. Each issue was carefully
defined and weighed against its impact on our commercial success and sustainable development.
The results of the materiality assessment helped us identify key issues and to focus our efforts on the benefits of
connectivity and sustainable products, environmental impact and climate change challenges, ethical business practices and the increasing need for data privacy and freedom of expression, supply chain responsibility, health & safety
and employee engagement as well as diversity. Please refer to our forthcoming 2016 Sustainability Report at www.nokia.com/people&planet for further details of the materiality assessment.
In 2016, we published 25 targets reflecting our commitment to sustainable development. Our sustainability strategy and reporting framework conform to key regulatory,
investor and customer requirements and globally recognized sustainability frameworks. Our Sustainability Report is prepared in accordance with the GRI sustainability reporting guidelines. In 2016, we incorporated information on our
sustainability activities based on the 21 UN Global Compact advanced level assessment criteria.
EcoVadis is one of the evaluation platforms through which we
provide annual sustainability information for evaluation which is then shared with customers as required. In 2016, we were judged Outstanding, the highest level in the gold category with a score of 85/100. We were in the top 1% of
suppliers assessed, achieving excellent scores in environment, labor practices, and supply chain management. In 2016, we retained our listing in the Dow Jones Sustainability Index with a score of 83/100 and were ranked leader of the
CMT communication equipment sector.
Other recognition included being ranked a leader in the CDP (formerly Carbon Disclosure Project) for our work on and
disclosure of climate change data and being listed in the World and Europe 120 indices of Euronext Vigeo. We reconfirmed our position in the Ethibel Sustainability Indices and were awarded best-in-class in human rights and climate change reporting
in the Sustainability Reporting Competition in Finland.
We have provided detailed reports on our progress and performance in sustainability and corporate
responsibility matters annually, and online for over a decade. For further information, refer to our People and Planet report at http://www.nokia.com/en_int/about-us/ sustainability.
Improving peoples lives through connectivity
The development of technologies such as 5G and IoT is expected to enable more people and billions of things to be connected, helping to realize smart
innovations in cities and homes, access to digital health and greater public safety. We can have the greatest impact on sustainable development through our main business of delivering networks, technology solutions and services to operators,
enterprises and organizations. Through our end-to-end portfolio, our technology can connect the unconnected, increase efficiency and productivity, and drive greater economic growth to improve the lives of people across the globe.
|
|
|
62 |
|
NOKIA ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 20-F 2016 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
43%
The networks we modernized brought on average energy savings of 43% for our customers
1 900
Over 1 900 of our leaders were trained on gender balance topics in 2016 |
|
Our radio networks customers serve around 5.5 billion subscriptions worldwide. In May 2016, we introduced our
ultra-compact network solution, providing a lightweight standalone LTE network, which can re-establish connectivity within minutes where existing communications are down. With satellite, microwave or cable link, it can connect rescue teams to
emergency services, hospitals and other teams in any location. This technology is also part of our Nokia Saving Lives innovation initiative, in which we combine the capabilities of the ultra-compact LTE network with drone video applications for
search and rescue missions.
Our digital health strategy, reinforced through our acquisition of Withings, centers on empowering people (i.e. by making
health monitoring more accessible). Building on Nokias track record of innovation, we are now positioned to help people live healthier lives through a portfolio of smart health solutions that are reliable, easy to use and grounded
in human-centered designqualities Nokia customers have come to expect.
Through our corporate community investment programs we rolled out a new project
in Myanmar in which technology plays a key role in improving early childhood care and development monitoring. We have, together with Save the Children, developed a web-based database and synchronized mobile application which is currently
being deployed, intended to replace slow, non-real-time paper-based data collection used during care center monitoring visits.
During a visit, the application enables saving of data on your mobile phone when offline and uploading it when online
again. This is particularly important in parts of Myanmar, and elsewhere, where there is limited network
coverage today.
Protecting the environment
We believe we can directly support the fight against climate change by reducing the energy usage of the products we deliver to our customers. We aim to minimize
our own operations footprint while also creating and delivering solutions that help our customers and other industries minimize theirs. For example, we offer an Asset Recovery Service as part of product lifecycle management. In 2016,
we sent around 2 450 metric tons of old telecommunications equipment for materials recovery and we refurbished approximately 85 800 units.
Our environmental
management system helps us monitor our progress and identify ways to improve further. We manage our own footprint through continued certification to ISO 14001 environmental management standard and our performance is audited regularly by
external auditors.
In 2016, we continued working towards improving our energy efficiency and controlling waste across our business.
Our total energy consumption across our facilities decreased by approximately 9%, as compared to 2015, which, consequently, reflected a decrease of approximately 16% in our greenhouse gas emissions, including our renewable energy usage. We
further reduced the carbon intensity (CO2 e/km) of our car fleet by 8%, as compared to 2015. Overall, the undertaken actions in our operations in 2016 reduced our total Scope 1 & 2 emissions by 10%, including emissions from our own marine fleet.
(In this paragraph, we compare our 2016 results to our 2015 results which represent the combined amounts of Nokia and Alcatel Lucent in 2015.)
Our actions were
further supported by customer deployment of AirScale base stations which feature new software that reduces radio module and system module energy consumption and even use zero energy in the absence of network traffic. In 2016, we
modernized 27% more base stations than in 2015, achieving average energy savings of 43% for our customers compared to non-modernized networks. This reduces the environmental impact of electricity consumption and is directly
reflected as increased financial benefits for our customers. We also acquired Eta Devices that specialize in power amplifier efficiency to support our goal of improved energy efficiency.
|
|
|
NOKIA ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 20-F 2016 |
|
63 |
Sustainability and
corporate
responsibility continued
Running our business with integrity
Ethical business
We conduct business based on defined high ethical
standards and apply our Code of Conduct across our operations, which allows us to build and maintain personal integrity and protect our reputation. We emphasize the implementation and understanding of the Code of Conduct across our
workforce, sales and supplier interactions. All our employees are expected to comply with our Code of Conduct.
Leadership involvement and oversight
of ethics and compliance are provided by the Board via the Audit Committee, which convened eight times in 2016. Compliance management is further supported by both global and regional compliance committees.
Employees and external stakeholders are urged to report any ethical misconduct using our compliance hotline which allows for anonymous reporting. In 2016, our
Ethics & Compliance office received 637 concerns, of which 228 were investigated by Ethics & Compliance Investigations as alleged violations of our Code of Conduct. We also implemented corrective actions including 17 dismissals and
40 written warnings following these and other investigations. We also track how our employees feel about raising concerns through a bi-monthly internal anonymous survey on whether our employees are comfortable raising concerns.
We also work hard to ensure the technology we provide is not used to infringe human rights, including the right to privacy, freedom of expression and assembly. We
further work closely with our supply chain to encourage adherence to the same standards of ethical business to help ensure responsible sourcing and globally acceptable labor practices.
Human rights, freedom of expression and privacy
In 2016, in order to mitigate the risks of potential misuse of our products and increase transparency, we updated our Human Rights Policy and followed up with training
to all relevant groups within Nokia. We run human rights due diligence processes as part of our global sales process, in order to further mitigate potential risks and cases of misuse. We are a founding member of the Telecommunications
Industry Dialogue Group (ID) and, as of October 2016, Nokia chairs the group. Since February 2016, we have had official observer status with the Global Network Initiative (GNI), with an aim of becoming a full member
in March 2017.
Responsible sourcing
We regularly run robust
assessments with our supplier network to support them in meeting our ethical standards and improving performance where necessary. In 2016, we implemented 390 supply chain audits, which included 45 on-site audits on Corporate Responsibility
topics; 39 were on-site audits against our supplier requirements and 306 suppliers were audited using the EcoVadis scorecards. Additionally, we run training workshops for suppliers operating in high-risk countries. In 2016, we organized online
training on conflict-free sourcing and climate change, and we arranged face-to-face training workshops establishing improvement plans and actions for 238 suppliers.
We work closely with our supply chain to jointly create environmental improvement programs and better our upstream Scope 3 emissions reporting (overall Scope 3 means
all indirect emissions that occur in our value chain, including upstream and downstream) through the CDP Supply Chain Program. In 2016, 243 of our key suppliers responded to the CDPs request to disclose their climate performance information and 127
also provided emission reduction targets.
The traceability of our materials and ensuring our products are conflict-free is a priority for us, which is also
reflected in our updated Conflict Minerals Policy. In 2016, 84% of smelters identified as part of Nokias supply chain have been validated as conflict-free or are active in the validation process. Refer to our conflict minerals report
available at http://www.nokia.com/en_int/ about-us/sustainability/downloads.
Respecting our people
In a year of integration, we emphasized a firm understanding of Nokias vision, values and culture through training, town hall meetings and communication. We
measure cultural cohesion through our Cultural Cohesion Tracker survey five times a year, and in 2016 understanding of Nokias vision rose from 85% favorable to 88%. In addition, one building block of the Cultural Cohesion Tracker is
Understanding New Nokia Mindset, which contains questions focused on behaviors, values, ethics and emotional connection and received 83% favorability at the end of 2016. We received over 70 000 responses covering a range of aspects
of working for Nokia.
The Nokia Code of Conduct also underpins our own labor conditions, along with the human resources policies that underline our approach
to fair employment.
We focus on ensuring that all our employees and contractors are aware of the risks related to their jobs and receive the necessary training and
equipment to work safelywhether in the office or on site. We address job-related health and safety risks through training, analysis, assessments and consequence management. We have put in place a wide range of programs to improve our health
and safety performance and encourage reporting of near misses and dangerous incidents by employees and contractors.
We realize that our employees must be
positively engaged for our business to be successful. In 2016, our employee engagement index showed a 76% favorability towards the company. We offer training, development programs, comprehensive reward packages and flexible working as part of
our effort to motivate and show that we value our employees and the work they do. In 2016, each employee spent an average of approximately 19 hours on training. Additionally, we arrange a one-hour dialog session every quarter between the
line manager and each team member, which covers objective setting and review of results, individual development, employee well-being and engagement, coaching by the line manager, and mutual feedback.
|
|
|
64 |
|
NOKIA ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 20-F 2016 |
The health, sports and activity programs we offer our employees contribute to cost savings in terms of reduced sick
leave days.
Diversity, inclusion and anti-discrimination are key to our employee makeup. In 2016, approximately 14% of our senior management positions were
held by women and over 1 900 leaders were trained on gender balance topics. In total, women accounted for 22% of Nokias workforce in 2016. Nokias employee-driven program, StrongHer, was selected by the ITU as an example of how to bridge
the gender digital divide in corporations in 2016. The average age of our employees in 2016 was 40 years.
Making
change happen together
To achieve our sustainability goals, we collaborate closely with suppliers, customers, non-governmental organizations
(NGOs), authorities and industry peers, not only supporting them in achieving their sustainability goals but also driving the sustainability of our products and solutions.
Working with NGOs
As part of our ongoing work with NGOs, we have
created a Group-wide corporate community investment approach with three key pillarsto connect the unconnected, to empower women, and to save lives. Our contribution focuses on how technology can improve access to better health, education
and information, and ultimately drives social, environmental and economic progress.
Cooperating with others in our industry and beyond
We are a member of the United Nations Global Compact, Global e-Sustainability Initiative, CDP supply chain program, ID, Climate Leadership Council, Digital Europe,
Conflict-Free Sourcing Initiative and several standardization and university cooperation groups. We have further structured engagement with the World Economic Forum, the Broadband Commission and ITU Telecom World, amongst others. In 2016, we became
a member of the GSMA Humanitarian Connectivity Charter. Working with ID, we also made a submission to the UN Special Rapporteur on freedom of opinion and expression to support his forthcoming study.
We also collaborate with the public sector to further the use of technology in enhancing sustainable development and improving the day-to-day lives of citizens. In
2016, we joined the Bristol Is Open initiative, becoming the first major telecommunications vendor to participate in Bristols unique living laboratory, underlining our commitment to smart city solutions. In support of the UNs Refugee
agency, we provided a Nokia OZO VR camera and equipment to The Humanitarian Cooperative to enable the creation of a film to raise awareness of, and action on, the current refugee crisis.
Employees
In 2016, the average number of Nokia employees was 102 687 (56 690 in 2015 and 51 499 in 2014). The total amount of salaries and wages paid in 2016 was
EUR 6 275 million (EUR 3 075 million in 2015 and EUR 2 797 million in 2014). Refer to Note 9, Personnel expenses, of our consolidated financial statements in this annual report on Form 20-F.
The table below shows the average number of employees in 2016, divided according to business and geographical location:
|
|
|
|
|
Business |
|
Average number of employees |
|
Networks business |
|
|
99 243 |
|
Nokia Technologies |
|
|
790 |
|
Group Common Functions |
|
|
2 654 |
|
Total |
|
|
102 687 |
|
Region |
|
Average number of employees |
|
Finland |
|
|
6 564 |
|
Other European countries |
|
|
31 550 |
|
Middle East & Africa |
|
|
4 024 |
|
China |
|
|
18 929 |
|
Asia-Pacific |
|
|
22 007 |
|
North America |
|
|
15 560 |
|
Latin America |
|
|
4 053 |
|
Total |
|
|
102 687 |
|
|
|
|
In addition to multi-year signature programs with Plan International, Save the Children and Oxfam, we have approved and planned new signature programs for launch in 2017 with e.g. UNICEF, Greenlight for Girls and Junior
Achievement. We also work with smaller charities whose programs use technology to improve lives. In 2016, through Nokia Corporate Community Investment and the Alcatel-Lucent Foundation, we contributed corporate-level resources totaling EUR
3 million, which supported 42 community organizations. |
|
|
|
|
|
NOKIA ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 20-F 2016 |
|
65 |
Dividend
|
|
|
The Board proposes a dividend of EUR 0.17 per share for 2016.
The proposed dividend is in line with our distribution policy.
We distribute retained earnings, if any, within the limits set by the Finnish Companies Act
(as defined below). We make and calculate the distribution, if any, in the form of cash dividends, share buy-backs, or in some other form or a combination of these. There is no specific formula by which the amount of a distribution is
determined, although some limits set by law are discussed below. The timing and amount of future distributions of retained earnings, if any, will depend on our future results and financial conditions.
Under the Finnish Companies Act, we may distribute retained earnings on our shares only upon a
shareholders resolution and subject to limited exceptions in the amount proposed by the Board. The amount of any distribution is limited to the amount of distributable earnings of the parent company pursuant to the last accounts approved by
our shareholders, taking into account the material changes in the financial situation of the company after the end of the last financial period and a statutory requirement that the distribution of earnings must not result
in insolvency of the company. Subject to exceptions relating to the right of minority shareholders to request a certain minimum distribution, the distribution may not exceed the amount proposed by the Board. |
|
|
|
|
|
66 |
|
NOKIA ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 20-F 2016 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Risk factors |
|
|
Set forth below is a description of risk factors that could affect our business. Shareholders
and potential investors should carefully review the following risk factors, in addition to other information contained in this annual report on Form 20-F. The risk factors described below should not be construed as exhaustive. There
may be additional risks that are unknown to us and other risks currently believed to be immaterial that could turn out to be material.
These risks, either
individually or collectively, could adversely affect our business, sales, profitability, results of operations, financial condition, competitiveness, costs, expenses, liquidity, market share, brand, reputation and share price. Unless otherwise
indicated or the context otherwise requires, references in these risk factors to Nokia, the Nokia Group, Group, we, us and our mean Nokias consolidated operating segments.
Certain risks or events may be more prevalent with respect to Nokia or a certain business group, business or part of the Group.
Additional risks and uncertainties
not presently known to us, or that are currently believed to be immaterial, could impair our business or the value of an investment made in it. This annual report on Form 20-F also contains forward-looking statements that involve risks and
uncertainties presented in Forward-looking statements above.
Our strategy is subject to various risks and uncertainties and we may be unable to successfully implement our
strategic plans, sustain or improve the operational and financial performance of our business groups, correctly identify or successfully pursue business opportunities or otherwise grow our business.
We announced our strategy to become a technology leader in the Programmable World in April 2014, which we have since endeavored to implement, most recently through the
Acquisition of Alcatel Lucent and the Sale of the HERE Business. In November 2016, we announced key financial and strategic targets as well as our updated strategy at our Capital Markets Day event. For further information refer to Business
OverviewOur strategy and Operating and financial review and prospectsPrincipal industry trends affecting operations.
We operate
in rapidly changing and innovative industries and the opportunities we pursue may require significant investments in innovation in order to generate growth, profitability or other targeted benefits across our business groups. Our strategy, which
includes targeted investments in our business and pursuing new business opportunities based on identified trends and opportunities, may not yield a return on our investment as planned or at all. Our ability to achieve strategic goals and
targets is subject to a number of uncertainties and contingencies, certain of which are beyond our control, and there can be no assurance that we will correctly identify trends or opportunities to pursue or be able to achieve the goals
or targets we have set. We continuously target various improvements in our operations and efficiencies through investing in R&D, entering into licensing arrangements, acquiring businesses and technologies, recruiting expert employees
and partnering with third parties. There can be no assurance that our efforts will generate the expected results or improvements in our operations or that we will achieve our intended targets or financial objectives related to such efforts. Any
failure to achieve our strategy may materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations. Furthermore, there can be no assurance that our investments will result in technologies, products or services that
achieve or retain broad or timely market acceptance, answers to the expanding needs or preferences of our customers or consumers, or break-through innovations that we could otherwise utilize for value creation.
As part of our strategy, we have and may continue to acquire or divest assets. For instance, we announced in February
2017 our intention to acquire Comptel to advance our software strategy. We may fail to complete planned acquisitions or divestments or to integrate acquired businesses or assets. Any such result could interfere with our ability to achieve our
strategy, obtain intended benefits, retain and motivate acquired key employees, or timely discover all liabilities of acquired businesses or assets, which may have a material adverse effect on our business. In particular, failure to
integrate Alcatel Lucent or to achieve the expected synergies or other benefits from the Acquisition of Alcatel Lucent could materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.
We may be unable to realize the anticipated benefits, including synergies, cost savings or efficiencies, from the Acquisition of Alcatel Lucent, and we may
encounter issues or inefficiencies related to our new organizational and operational structure, including not being able to successfully implement our business plans and to integrate Alcatel Lucents business.
We have allocated, and will continue to allocate, significant resources to integrate Alcatel Lucents business and implement our business plans and strategy.
Achieving the anticipated benefits, synergies and other efficiencies from the Acquisition of Alcatel Lucent will depend largely on the timely and efficient integration of the business operations of Nokia and Alcatel Lucent
and the combined companys ability to successfully implement our business plans. Despite our progress in the integration, there can be no assurance that the overall integration of Alcatel Lucent will be successful or yield
expected benefits and results. The integration process involves certain risks and uncertainties, some of which are outside our control, and there can be no assurance that we will be able to realize the intended organizational and operational
benefits related to our business plans in the manner or within the timeframe currently anticipated. Such risks and uncertainties include, among others, the distraction of our managements attention from our business resulting in
performance shortfalls, the disruption of our ongoing business, interference with our ability to maintain our relationships with customers, vendors, regulators and employees and inconsistencies in our services, standards, controls, procedures and
policies, any of which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of
|
|
|
NOKIA ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 20-F 2016 |
|
67 |
Risk factors continued
operations. Potential challenges that we may encounter regarding the integration process and operation as a combined
company include the following:
∎ |
adverse contractual issues with respect to various agreements with third parties (including joint venture agreements, customers, vendors, licensees or other contractual parties), certain financing facilities,
pension fund agreements, agreements for the performance of engineering and related work/services, IT agreements, technology, intellectual property rights and licenses, employment agreements, or pension and other post-retirement benefits-related
liability issues; |
∎ |
inability to retain or motivate key employees and recruit employees; |
∎ |
disruptions caused, for instance, by reorganizations triggered by the Acquisition of Alcatel Lucent, which may result in inefficiency within the new organization through loss of key employees or delays
in implementing our intended structural changes, among other issues; |
∎ |
inability to achieve the targeted organizational changes, efficiencies or synergies in the targeted time or to the extent targeted, for instance due to inability to streamline overlapping products and services,
rationalize our organization and overheads, reduce overheads and costs or achieve targeted efficiencies, and the risk of new and additional costs associated with implementing such changes; |
∎ |
inability to rationalize or streamline our organization or product lines or to retire legacy products and related services as a result of pre-existing customer commitments; |
∎ |
loss of, or lower volume of, business from key customers, or the inability to renew agreements with existing customers or establish new customer relationships, including limitations linked to customer policies with
respect to aggregate vendor share or supplier diversity policies or increased efforts from competitors aiming to capitalize on disruptions, for instance, in our integration processes; |
∎ |
conditions and burdens imposed by laws, regulators or industry standards on our business or adverse regulatory or industry developments or litigation affecting us, as a result of the Acquisition of Alcatel Lucent
or otherwise; |
∎ |
potential unknown or larger than estimated liabilities of Alcatel Lucent (prior to the acquisition) or other adverse circumstances related to Alcatel Lucent that lead to larger than expected liabilities or have other
adverse impacts on us; |
∎ |
claims, fines, investigations or assessments for conduct that we failed to or were unable to discover or identify in the course of performing our due diligence investigations of Alcatel Lucent prior to the acquisition,
including unknown or unasserted liabilities and issues relating to fraud, non-compliance with applicable laws and regulations, improper accounting policies or other improper activities; |
∎ |
challenges relating to the consolidation of corporate, financial data and reporting, control and administrative functions, including cash management, foreign exchange/hedging operations, internal and other
financing, insurance, financial control and reporting, IT, communications, legal and compliance and other administrative functions; |
∎ |
the coordination of R&D, marketing and other support functions may fail or cause inefficiencies or other administrative burdens caused by operating the combined business; |
∎ |
we may not be able to successfully maintain the Nokia Bell Labs research and innovation capabilities, or the Acquisition of Alcatel Lucent or the related integration could have an adverse effect on Nokia Bell Labs;
|
∎ |
potential divestitures of certain businesses or operations, as desired, for which there can be no assurance that we would be successful in executing such a transaction on favorable terms or at all; and
|
∎ |
our ability to eliminate the complexity of our corporate structure following the Acquisition of Alcatel Lucent. |
Following the Acquisition of Alcatel Lucent, we have implemented a new leadership team and a new operational structure for our business. For more
information on our structure, refer to Business overview. The new organizational and operational structure may not be appropriately suited to meet our business plans, could be more costly than anticipated, and could adversely
affect our ability to achieve the business growth opportunities, cost savings benefits, increased profitability, targeted synergies or efficiencies, which could lead to material adverse effects on our business, financial condition and results
of operations.
Additionally, the anticipated cost reductions and other benefits expected to arise from the Acquisition of Alcatel
Lucent and the integration of Alcatel Lucent into our existing business, as well as related costs to implement such measures, are derived from our estimates, which are inherently uncertain. Our estimates are based on a number of assumptions
made in reliance on the information available to us and managements judgments based on such information, including, without limitation, information relating to the business operations, financial condition and results of operations of Alcatel
Lucent. While we believe these estimated synergy benefits and related costs are reasonable, the underlying assumptions are inherently uncertain and subject to a variety of significant business, economic, and competitive factors, risks and
uncertainties that could cause our actual results to differ materially from those contained in the expected synergy benefits and related cost estimates.
We
may be materially and adversely affected by general economic and market conditions and other developments in the economies where we operate.
As we are a
company with global operations and sales in many countries around the world, our sales and profitability are dependent on general economic conditions both globally and regionally, the global financial markets, as well as industry and market
developments in numerous diverse markets. Adverse developments in, or the general weakness of, economic conditions, such as unemployment or consumer spending, may have an adverse impact on the spending patterns of end-users. This, in turn, may
affect both the services they subscribe to and the usage levels of such services, which may lead mobile operators and service providers to invest less in related infrastructure and services or to invest in low-margin products and services, which
could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, and results of operations.
General uncertainty and adverse developments in the financial
markets and the general economy could have a material adverse effect on our ability to obtain sufficient or affordable financing on satisfying terms. Uncertain market conditions may increase the price of financing or decrease
its availability. We could encounter difficulties in raising funds or accessing liquidity, which may have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
|
|
|
68 |
|
NOKIA ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 20-F 2016 |
We face intense competition and may fail to effectively and profitably invest in new competitive high-quality
products, services, upgrades and technologies or bring them to market in a timely manner.
Our business and the markets where we operate are characterized
by rapidly evolving technologies, frequent new technological requirements, product feature introductions and evolving industry standards. Our business performance depends on the timely and successful introduction of new products, services and
upgrades of current products to meet the evolving requirements of customers, comply with emerging industry standards and address competing technological and product developments carried out by competitors. The R&D of new and innovative,
technologically advanced products, as well as upgrades to current products and new generations of technologies, is a complex and uncertain process requiring high levels of innovation and investment, in addition to accurate
anticipation of technological, regulatory and market trends. We may focus our resources on products and technologies that do not become widely accepted or ultimately prove unviable. Additionally, many of our current and planned products are highly
complex and may contain defects or errors that are, for instance, detected only after deployment in telecommunications networks. Our results of operations will depend to a significant extent on our ability to succeed in the following areas:
∎ |
maintaining and developing a product portfolio and service capability that are attractive to our customers, for instance by keeping pace with technological advances in our industry and pursuing
the technologies that become commercially accepted; |
∎ |
continuing to introduce new products and product upgrades successfully and on a timely basis; |
∎ |
developing new or enhancing existing tools for our services offerings; |
∎ |
optimizing the amount of customer or market specific technology, product and feature variants in our product portfolio; |
∎ |
continuing to enhance the quality of our products and services as well as introducing products and services that have desired features and attributes, such as energy efficiency;
|
∎ |
pricing products and services appropriately, which is crucial in the networks infrastructure business due to the typical long-term nature and complexity of the agreements; and |
∎ |
leveraging our technological strengths. |
Certain of our competitors have significant resources to invest in market
exploration and may seek new monetization models or drive industry development and capture value in areas where we may not currently be competitive or do not have similar resources available to us. These areas may include monetization models
linked to large amounts of consumer data, large connected communities, home or other entertainment services, digital media and VR products, healthcare products and services, alternative payment mechanisms or marketing products. We also face
competition from various companies that may be able to develop technologies or products that become preferred over those developed by us or result in adverse effects on us through, for instance, developing technological innovations that make
our innovations less relevant.
The participants in the information technology, communications and related services market compete on the basis of product
offerings, technical capabilities, quality, price and affordability through consumer financing arrangements. Any failure by us to effectively and profitably invest in new competitive products, services, upgrades or technologies and bring them to
market in a timely manner could result in a loss of net sales and market share and have a material adverse effect on our results of operations, competitiveness, profitability and financial condition.
The competitive environment in this market continues to be intense and is characterized by maturing industry technologies, equipment price erosion and aggressive price
competition. Moreover, mobile operators cost reductions and network sharing, and industry consolidation among operators have reduced the amount of available business, resulting in further competition and pressure on pricing and profitability.
Consolidation of operators may result in vendors and service providers concentrating their business in certain service providers and increasing the possibility that agreements with us are terminated or not renewed. Furthermore, there are various
incumbent and new players competing with Nokia in customer groups we strategically target, such as Webscales and customers in energy, transport, public sector
and TXLEs. With these types of customers, the nature of competition can be significantly different from the
communication service provider markets, including competition based on access network, core network, Cloud infrastructure, platforms, applications and devices.
We compete with companies that have large overall scale, which affords such companies more flexibility (e.g., on pricing). We also continue to face intense competition
globally, including from companies based in China which endeavor to gain further market share and broaden their presence in new areas of the network infrastructure and related services business (e.g., by providing lower-cost products and
services). Competition for new customers, as well as for new infrastructure deployment, is particularly intense and focused on the favorability of price and agreement terms. Additionally, new competitors may enter the industry as a result of
acquisitions or shifts in technology. For example, the virtualization of core and radio networks and the convergence of IT and telecommunications may lower the barriers to entry for IT companies entering the traditional telecommunications industry
or build up tight strategic partnerships with our traditional competitors. These developments may enable more generic IT, software and hardware to be used in telecommunications networks leading to further pricing pressure. Additionally, Facebook
launched the Telecom Infra Project in 2016 with the declared objective to drive a faster pace of innovation in telecommunication infrastructure through more collaborative approaches and open technologies across access, backhaul, core and management.
Other Webscale players are and may be launching similar initiatives. While Nokia is actively participating in such initiatives, these developments may increase competition and reduce our market share. If we are unable to respond
successfully to competitive challenges in the markets in which we operate, our business, financial condition and results of operations may be materially and adversely affected.
We must introduce high-quality products and services in a cost-efficient, timely manner and manage proactively the costs related to our portfolio of products and
services, including component sourcing, manufacturing, logistics and other operations. If we fail to maintain or improve our market position, competitiveness or scale, or if we fail to leverage our scale to the fullest extent and keep
prices and costs at competitive levels or provide high-quality products and services, this could materially and adversely affect our competitive position, business and results of operations, particularly our profitability.
|
|
|
NOKIA ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 20-F 2016 |
|
69 |
Risk factors continued
We are dependent on the development of the industries in which we operate, including the information technology
and communications industries and related services market, as well as the digital media and digital health markets. The information technology and communications industries and related services market are cyclical and are affected by many factors,
including the general economic environment, purchase behavior, deployment, roll-out timing and spending by service providers, consumers and businesses. The digital media and digital health markets are rapidly evolving markets affected by numerous
factors, including regulation and IPR.
Our sales and profitability are dependent on the development of the industries in which we operate, including the
information technology and communications and related services market in numerous markets around the world. For instance, we are particularly dependent on the investments made by mobile operators and network service providers in network
infrastructure and related services. The pace and size of such investments are in turn dependent on the ability of network service providers and mobile operators to increase their subscriber numbers, reduce churn and compete with business models
eroding revenue from traditional voice, messaging and data transport services, as well as the financial condition of such network service providers and mobile operators. Additionally, market developments favoring new technological solutions, such as
SDN, may reduce spending by our competitors who have, or may have, a stronger position in such technologies. The technological viability of standardized, low-margin hardware products in combination with the virtualization of functions can
induce a change in purchase behavior, resulting in favoring other vendors or in higher bargaining power versus Nokia due to more alternative vendors. Both effects could have a material adverse effect on our business.
We expect to generate a significant share of our growth from new customers, including Webscales and vertical customers in energy, transport, public sector and TXLEs.
Each of these sectors may face adverse industry developments which may significantly impact the size of investments addressable by us and our ability to address these investments, in terms of both having the right products
available and being able to attain new customers.
The level of demand by service providers and other customers that purchase our products and services can change
quickly and can vary over short periods of time. As a result of the uncertainty and variations in the telecommunications and vertical industries, accurately forecasting revenues, results and cash flow remains difficult.
Our success in the industries where we operate is subject to a number of risks and uncertainties, including:
∎ |
the intensity of competition; |
∎ |
further consolidation of our customers or competitors; |
∎ |
our ability to develop products and services in a timely manner, or at all, that meet future technological or quality requirements and challenges at a competitive cost level; |
∎ |
our ability to maintain and build up strategic partnerships in our value creation chain (e.g., in product creation and in project delivery); |
∎ |
our ability to correctly estimate technological developments or adapt successfully to such developments; |
∎ |
the development of the relevant markets and/or industry standards in directions that leave us deficient in certain technologies and industry areas that impact our overall competitiveness; |
∎ |
the choice of our customers to turn to alternative vendors to maintain end-to-end services from such vendors; |
∎ |
our ability to successfully develop market recognition as a leading provider of software and services in the information technology and communications and related services market, in the digital media and digital health
markets as well as with our vertical customers in energy, transport, public sector and TXLEs; |
∎ |
our ability to sustain or grow net sales in our business and areas of strategic focus, which could result in the loss of benefits related to economies of scale and reduced competitiveness; |
∎ |
our ability to identify opportunities and enter into agreements that are commercially successful;
|
∎ |
our ability to continue utilizing current customer relations to advance our sales of related services, or pursue new service-led growth opportunities; |
∎ |
our global presence that involves large projects that expose us to various business and operational risks including those related to market developments, political unrest or change in political atmosphere, economic and
trade sanctions and compliance and anti-corruption-related risks, especially with respect to emerging markets; and |
∎ |
our ability to maintain efficient and low-cost operations. |
Our inability to overcome any of the above risks or
uncertainties could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations or financial performance.
We conduct our business globally, exposing us to
political and regional risks, including unfavorable or unpredictable treatment in relation to tax matters, exchange controls, and other restrictions.
We
generate sales from, and have manufacturing facilities and suppliers located in, various countries around the world. Regulatory developments, economic developments, political turmoil, military actions, labor unrest, civil unrest, public health and
safety (including disease outbreaks), environmental issues (including adverse effects resulting from climate change) and natural and man-made disasters in such countries could have a material adverse effect on our ability to supply products and
services, including network infrastructure equipment manufactured in such countries, and on our sales and results of operations. In recent years, we have witnessed political unrest in various markets in which we conduct business or in which we have
operations, which in turn has adversely affected our sales, profitability or operations in these markets, and in certain cases affected us outside these countries or regions. Any reoccurrence or escalation of such unrest could have a further
material adverse effect on our sales or results of operations. For instance, instability and conflict in regions such as the Middle East, parts of Africa and Ukraine have in the past adversely affected, and may in the future adversely affect, our
business or operations in these or related markets (e.g., through increased economic uncertainty or a slowdown or downturn attributable to current or increased economic and trade sanctions).
|
|
|
70 |
|
NOKIA ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 20-F 2016 |
We have a significant presence in emerging markets in which the political, economic, legal and regulatory systems are
less predictable than in countries with more developed institutions. These markets represent a significant portion of our total sales, and a significant portion of expected future industry growth. Most of our suppliers are located in, and our
products are manufactured and assembled in, emerging markets, particularly in Asia. Our business and investments in emerging markets may also be subject to risks and uncertainties, including unfavorable or unpredictable treatment in relation to tax
matters, exchange controls, restrictions affecting our ability to make cross-border transfers of funds, regulatory proceedings, unsound or unethical business practices, challenges in protecting our IPR, nationalization, inflation, currency
fluctuations or the absence of or unexpected changes in regulation, as well as other unforeseeable operational risks. The purchasing power of our customers in developing markets depends to a greater extent on the price development of
basic commodities and currency fluctuations, which may render our products or services unaffordable.
We continuously monitor international developments
and assess the appropriateness of our presence and business in various markets. For instance, as a result of international developments, we have expanded our business in Iran in compliance with applicable economic sanctions and other regulations.
While the international agreement on Irans nuclear activities has led to a relaxation of international sanctions, many jurisdictions continue to impose various restrictions on conducting business in Iran and the international regulatory
framework remains complex. Adverse political or other developments could potentially lead to a reintroduction of sanctions which might necessitate a reassessment of our position there. Should we decide to exit or otherwise alter our presence in a
particular market, this may have an adverse effect on us through, for example, triggering investigations, tax audits by authorities, claims by contracting parties or reputational damage. The results and costs of investigations or claims against
our international operations may be difficult to predict and could lead to lengthy disputes, fines or fees, indemnities or costly settlements.
Our efforts aimed at managing and improving our financial or operational performance, cost savings, competitiveness
and obtaining the targeted synergy benefits and cost savings, may not lead to targeted results, benefits, cost savings or improvements.
We need
to manage our operating expenses and other internal costs to maintain cost efficiency and competitive pricing of our products and services. Failure by us to determine the appropriate prioritization of operating expenses and other costs, to
identify and implement the appropriate measures to adjust our operating expenses and other costs on a timely basis, or to maintain achieved cost reduction levels, could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and
financial condition. For instance, we have announced targeted operating cost savings in relation to the Acquisition of Alcatel Lucent and achieving these operating cost savings is dependent partly on the continued efficient integration of the
companies which may include certain uncertainties.
We operate in highly competitive industries and we are continuously targeting increased efficiency of our
operations through various initiatives. We may, in the ordinary course of business, institute new plans for restructuring measures. Such restructuring measures may be costly, potentially disruptive to operations, and may not lead to sustainable
improvements in our overall competitiveness and profitability and, thus, may have a material adverse effect on our business or results of operations, for instance, as a result of the loss of benefits related to economies of scale.
In addition to our efforts in operating cost savings, both Nokia and Alcatel Lucent have separately prior to the acquisition implemented various efficiency and other
programs aimed at improving cost savings and financial performance. We may implement new similar programs going forward and there can be no assurance that such plans will be met as planned or result in sustainable improvements. Factors
that may prevent a successful implementation or cause adverse effects on us include the following:
∎ |
expectations with respect to market growth, customer demand and other trends in the industry in which we operate;
|
∎ |
our ability to benefit from industry trends may prove to be inaccurate and changes in the general economic conditions, whether globally, nationally or in the markets in which we operate, may impact our ability
to implement such plans; |
∎ |
a down-turn in global or regional economic conditions may have an adverse effect on our ability to achieve the cost savings contemplated; |
∎ |
unfavorable changes in legislation in the markets in which we operate may influence timing, costs and expected savings of certain initiatives contemplated; |
∎ |
our ability to successfully develop new or improve existing products, market products to new or existing customers, enter new markets and otherwise grow our business in a highly competitive market;
|
∎ |
organizational changes related to the implementation plans require the alignment and adjustment of resources, systems and tools, which if not completed in a structured manner could impact our ability to achieve our
goals, projected cost savings and ability to achieve the efficiencies contemplated; |
∎ |
the costs to effect the initiatives contemplated by our plans may exceed our estimates and we may not be able to realize the targeted cash inflows or yield other expected proceeds; |
∎ |
our cost saving initiatives, including R&D, may negatively affect our ability to develop new or improve existing products and compete effectively in certain markets, and there is no guarantee that we will continue
to be able to successfully innovate or remain technologically competitive; |
∎ |
disruptions to regular business operations caused by the plans, including to unaffected parts of Nokia; the benefits of our plans may not be realized in contemplated timeframes or at all; |
∎ |
intended business plans may require us to inform or consult with employees and labor representatives, and such processes may influence the timing, costs and extent of expected savings and the feasibility of certain of
the initiatives contemplated; |
∎ |
bargaining power of our suppliers may prevent us from achieving targeted procurement savings;
|
|
|
|
NOKIA ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 20-F 2016 |
|
71 |
Risk factors continued
∎ |
skilled employees may leave or we may not be able to recruit employees as a result of planned initiatives, and loss of their expertise may cause adverse effects on our business or limit our ability to achieve
our goals; and |
∎ |
overall deterioration of brand value among potential and current employees or as a preferred employer. |
While we are
implementing and have implemented various cost savings and other initiatives in the past, and may implement such initiatives in the future, there can be no assurance that we will be able to complete those successfully or that we will realize the
projected benefits. Our plans may be altered in the future, including adjusting any projected financial or other targets. The anticipated costs or the level of disruption expected from implementing such plans or restructurings may be higher than
expected.
If we are unable to realize the projected benefits or contemplated cost savings by efforts aimed at managing and improving financial
performance, operational performance, cost savings, competitiveness, targeted results or improvements, we may experience negative impacts on our reputation or a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations
and cash flows. Efforts to plan and implement cost saving initiatives may divert management attention from the rest of the business and adversely affect our business.
We are dependent on a limited number of customers and large multi-year agreements. The loss of a single customer, operator consolidation, unfavorable contract terms
or other issues related to a single agreement may have a material adverse effect on our business and financial condition.
A significant proportion of the net
sales that we generate have historically been derived from a limited number of customers. As consolidation among existing customers continues, it is possible that an even greater portion of our net sales will be attributable to a smaller number of
large service providers operating in multiple markets. These developments are also likely to increase the impact on our net sales based on the outcome of certain individual agreement tenders.
Mobile operators are increasingly entering into network sharing arrangements, as well as joint procurement agreements, which may reduce their investments and
the number of networks available for us to service. Furthermore, procurement organizations of certain large mobile operators sell consulting services to enhance the negotiating position of small operators
with their vendors. As a result of these trends and the intense competition in the industry, we may be required to
agree to increasingly less favorable terms in order to remain competitive. Any unfavorable developments in relation to, or any change in the agreement terms applicable to, a major customer may have a material adverse effect on our business, results
of operations and financial condition. Also, due to the long-term nature of the agreements, it is possible that the contract terms of the agreement may prove less favorable to us than originally expected, for instance due to changes in costs and
product portfolio decisions.
As a result of the Acquisition of Alcatel Lucent, we may lose certain existing agreements, or be unable to renew or gain new
agreements due to customer diversity policies that limit the ability of customers to have one network provider exceeding a certain threshold of business in a given market. Policies or practices in certain countries may also limit the
possibility for foreign vendors to participate in certain business areas over a certain threshold.
Furthermore, there is a risk that the timing
of sales and results of operations associated with large multi-year agreements, which are typical in the mobile infrastructure and related services business, will differ from expectations. Moreover, such agreements often require dedication
of substantial amounts of working capital and other resources, which may adversely affect our cash flow, particularly in the early stages of an agreements term, or may require us to continue to sell certain products and services, or to
sell in certain markets, that would otherwise be discontinued or exited, thereby diverting resources from developing more profitable or strategically important products and services, or focusing on more profitable or strategically important markets.
Any suspension, termination or non-performance by us under an agreements terms may have a material adverse effect on us (e.g., due to penalties for breaches or early termination).
Due to our global operations, our net sales, costs and results of operations, as well as the U.S. dollar value of our dividends and market price of our ADSs, are
affected by exchange rate fluctuations.
We operate globally and are therefore exposed to foreign exchange risks in the form of both transaction risks and
translation risks. Our policy is to monitor and hedge exchange rate exposure, and we manage our operations to mitigate, but not to eliminate, the impacts of exchange rate fluctuations. There can be no assurance, however, that our hedging
activities will prove successful in mitigating the potentially negative impact of exchange rate fluctuations.
Additionally, significant volatility in the relevant exchange rates may increase our hedging costs, as well as limit our ability to hedge our exchange rate exposure. In particular, we may not adequately hedge against unfavorable exchange rate
movements, including those of certain emerging market currencies, which could have an adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations. Furthermore, exchange rate fluctuations may have an adverse effect on our net sales,
costs and results of operations, as well as our competitive position, through their impact on our customers and competitors. Additionally, exchange rate fluctuations may materially affect the U.S. dollar value of any dividends or other
distributions that are paid in euro, as well as the market price of our ADSs.
We also experience other financial market-related risks, including changes in
interest rates and in prices of marketable securities that we own. We may use derivative financial instruments to reduce certain of these risks. If our strategies to reduce such risks are not successful, our financial condition and results of
operation may be harmed.
The Nokia Technologies business groups patent licensing income and other intellectual property-related revenues are subject to
risks and uncertainties such as our ability to maintain our existing sources of intellectual property-related revenue, establish new sources of revenue and protect our intellectual property from infringement. A proportionally significant share of
the current patent licensing income is generated from the smartphone market which is rapidly changing and features a limited number of large vendors.
We
have historically invested significantly in R&D to develop new relevant technologies, products and services for our business. This has led to the Nokia Technologies business group possessing one of the industrys strongest
intellectual property portfolios, including numerous standardized or proprietary patented technologies. We now have two further, distinct and industry-leading portfolios: the Nokia Networks and Alcatel Lucent portfolios. Many of our products and
services use or are protected by patents in these portfolios. We also generate revenue by licensing, and we seek to renew existing license agreements and negotiate new license agreements. We also seek to expand the scope of our licensing
activities to other industries, in particular those that implement mobile communication technologies.
|
|
|
72 |
|
NOKIA ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 20-F 2016 |
The continued strength of our portfolios depends on our ability to create new relevant technologies, products and
services through our R&D activities and to protect our IPR. If those technologies, products and services do not become relevant, and therefore attractive to licensees, the strength of our intellectual property portfolios could be reduced, which
could adversely affect our ability to use our intellectual property portfolios for revenue generation. Our intellectual property-related revenue can vary considerably from time to time based on factors such as the terms of agreements we enter into
with licensees, and there is no assurance that past levels are indicative of future levels of intellectual property-related revenue.
Despite the steps
that we have taken to protect our technology investments with IPR, we cannot be certain that any rights or pending applications will be granted or that the rights granted in connection with any future patents or other IPR will be sufficiently
broad to protect our innovations. Third parties may infringe our intellectual property relating to our proprietary technologies or disregard their obligation to seek a license under our SEPs or seek to pay less than reasonable license fees. If we
are unable to continue to develop or protect our intellectual property-related revenue or establish new sources of revenue, this may materially and adversely affect our business, financial position and results of operations.
The Nokia Technologies business groups sales and profitability are currently largely derived from patent licensing. Patent licensing income may be adversely
affected by general economic conditions or adverse market developments, as well as regulatory and other developments with respect to protection awarded to technology innovations or compensation trends with respect to licensing. For example, our
patent licensing business may be adversely affected if a licensees ability to pay is reduced or they become insolvent or bankrupt. Additionally, poor performance of potential or current licensees may limit a licensees motivation
to seek new or renew existing licensing arrangements with us. In certain cases, patent licensing income is dependent on the sales of the licensee, where the reduced sales of the licensee have a direct effect on the patent licensing income
received by the Nokia Technologies business group.
We enforce our patents against unlawful infringement and generate revenue through realizing the value of our
intellectual property by entering into license agreements and occasionally through business transactions. Patent license agreements can cover both licensees past and future sales. The portion of the income that relates to licensees past
sales is not expected to have a recurring benefit and ongoing patent income from licensing is generally subject to various factors that we have little or no control over, for instance sales by the licensees.
In certain cases, we have initiated litigation to enforce our patents and seek licensing fees or utilized arbitration proceedings to establish the terms of
compensation between the parties. For instance, in December 2016, we initiated litigation against Apple in several jurisdictions for infringement of Nokia patents. Due to the nature of any litigation or arbitration proceedings, there can
be no assurances as to the final outcome or timing of any outcome of litigation, arbitration or other resolution.
Regulatory developments, actions by authorities,
or applications of regulations may adversely affect our ability to protect our intellectual property or create intellectual property-related revenue. Any patents or other IPR may be challenged, invalidated or circumvented, and any right
granted under our patents may not provide competitive advantages for us. Our ability to protect and monetize our intellectual property may depend on regulatory developments in various jurisdictions and the implementation of the regulations
by administrative bodies. Our ability to protect, license or divest our patented innovations may vary by region. In the technology sector generally, certain licensees are actively avoiding license payments, while some licensors are using
aggressive methods to collect license payments, with both behaviors attracting regulatory attention. Authorities in various countries have increasingly monitored patent monetization and may aim to influence the terms on which patent licensing
arrangements or patent divestments may be executed. Such terms may be limited to a certain country or region; however, authorities could potentially seek to widen the scope and even impose global terms, potentially resulting in an adverse effect on
us or limiting our ability to monetize our patent portfolios.
Intellectual property-related disputes and litigation are common in the technology industry and are often used to
enforce patents and seek licensing fees. Other companies have commenced and may continue to commence actions seeking to establish the invalidity of our intellectual property, including our patents. In the event that one or more of our patents
is challenged, a court may invalidate the patent or determine that the patent is not enforceable, which could have an impact on our competitive position. The outcome of court proceedings is difficult to predict and, consequently, our ability to
use intellectual property for revenue generation may from time to time depend on favorable court rulings. Additionally, if any of our patents is invalidated, or if the scope of the claims in any patents is limited by a court decision, we could be
prevented from using such patents as a basis for product differentiation or from licensing the invalidated or limited portion of our IPR. Even if such a patent challenge is not successful, the related proceedings could be expensive and
time-consuming, divert the attention of our management and technical experts from our business and have an adverse effect on our reputation. Any diminution in the protection of our IPR could cause us to lose certain benefits of our R&D
investments.
We retained our entire patent portfolio after the Sale of the D&S Business in 2014. Following the Sale of the D&S Business, Nokia
Technologies is no longer required to agree cross-licenses to cover its handset business, which has contributed to growing our licensing revenue. While this has been our practice, there can be no guarantee that this can be continued in future. In
the past, parts of our intellectual property development were driven by innovation from the D&S Business. As we no longer own this business, our future intellectual property relating to the mobile phone sector may lessen and our ability to
influence industry trends and technology selections may reduce.
We also enter into business agreements separately within our business groups which may grant
certain licenses to our patents. Some of these agreements may inadvertently grant licenses to our patents with a broader scope than intended, or they may otherwise make the enforcement of our patents more difficult.
|
|
|
NOKIA ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 20-F 2016 |
|
73 |
Risk factors continued
Our products, services and business models depend on technologies that we have developed as well as technologies
that are licensed to us by certain third parties. As a result, evaluating the rights related to the technologies we use or intend to use is increasingly challenging, and we expect to continue to face claims that we have allegedly
infringed third parties IPR. The use of these technologies may also result in increased licensing costs for us, restrictions on our ability to use certain technologies in our products and/or costly and time-consuming litigation.
Our products and services include, and our business models depend on, utilization of numerous patented standardized or proprietary technologies. We
invest significantly in R&D through our business to develop new relevant technologies, products and services. Our R&D activities have resulted in us having one of the industrys strongest intellectual property portfolios, on which
our products and services and future cash generation and income depend. We believe our innovations that are protected by IPR are a strong competitive advantage for our business. The continued strength of our IPR portfolios depends on
our ability to create new relevant technologies, products and services through our R&D activities.
Our products and services include increasingly complex
technologies that we have developed or that have been licensed to us by certain third parties. The amount of such proprietary technologies and the number of parties claiming IPR continue to increase, even within individual products, as the
range of our products becomes more diversified and as the complexity of the technology increases. We continue to face the possibility of alleged infringement and related intellectual property claims going forward. The holders of patents and other
IPR potentially relevant to our existing and future products may be unknown to us, may have different business models, may refuse to grant licenses to their proprietary rights or may otherwise make it difficult for us to acquire a license
on commercially acceptable terms. There may also be technologies licensed to and relied on by us that are subject to alleged infringement or other corresponding allegations or claims by others which could impair our ability to rely on such
technologies. Additionally, although we endeavor to ensure that companies collaborating with us possess appropriate IPR or licenses, we cannot fully avoid the risks of IPR infringement by suppliers of components, processes and other various layers
in our
products, or by companies with which we collaborate. Similarly, we and our customers may face claims of infringement in
connection with the use of our products.
In line with standard industry practice, we generally indemnify our customers for certain intellectual
property-related infringement claims related to products or services purchased from us. Such claims are generally made directly to our customer and we may have limited possibilities to control the processes or evaluate the outcomes in advance. As
such, indemnifications can result in significant payment obligations for us that may be difficult to predict in advance.
The business models for many areas in
advanced IT, including mobile services, may not be clearly established. The lack of availability of licenses for copyrighted content, delayed negotiations or restrictive licensing terms may have a material adverse effect on the cost or timing
of content-related services offered by us, mobile network operators or third-party service providers.
Since all technology standards that we use, and rely on,
including 3G, LTE mobile communication technologies and 5G, include certain IPR, we cannot fully avoid risks of a claim for infringement of such rights due to our reliance on such standards. We believe the number of third parties
declaring their intellectual property to be potentially relevant to these standards is increasing, which may increase the likelihood that we will be subject to such claims in the future. As the number of market entrants and the complexity
of technology increases, it remains likely that we will need to obtain licenses with respect to existing and new standards from other licensors. While we believe most such IPR declared or actually found to be essential
to a particular standard carries an obligation to be licensed on fair, reasonable and non-discriminatory terms, not all intellectual property owners agree. As a result, we have experienced costly and time-consuming
litigation over such issues and we may continue to experience such litigation in the future.
From time to time, certain existing patent licenses may expire or
otherwise become subject to renegotiation. The inability to renew or finalize such arrangements or renew licenses with acceptable commercial terms may result in costly and time-consuming litigation, and any adverse result in any such litigation
may lead to restrictions on our ability to sell certain products and could result in payments that could potentially have a material adverse effect on our operating results and financial condition.
These legal proceedings may continue to be expensive and time-consuming and divert the efforts of our
management and technical experts from our business and, if decided against us, could result in restrictions on our ability to sell our products, require us to pay increased licensing fees, unfavorable judgments, costly settlements,
fines or other penalties and expenses.
Our patent license agreements may not cover all the future businesses that we may enter, our existing business may not
necessarily be covered by our patent license agreements if there are changes in our corporate structure or our subsidiaries, or our newly-acquired businesses may already have patent license agreements with terms that differ from similar terms
in our patent license agreements. This may result in increased costs, restrictions in the use of certain technologies or time-consuming and costly disputes whenever there are changes in our corporate structure or our subsidiaries,
or whenever we enter into new business areas or acquire new businesses.
We make accruals and provisions to cover our estimated total direct IPR
costs for our products. The total direct IPR costs consist of actual payments to licensors, accrued expenses under existing agreements and provisions for potential liabilities. We believe our accruals and provisions are appropriate for all
technologies owned by third parties. The ultimate outcome, however, may differ from the provided level, which could have a positive or adverse impact on our results of operations and financial condition.
Any restrictions on our ability to sell our products due to expected or alleged infringements of third-party IPR and any IPR claims, regardless of merit, could
result in a material loss of profits, costly litigation, the obligation to pay damages and other compensation, the diversion of the attention of our key employees, product shipment delays or the need for us to develop non-infringing technology
or to enter into a licensing agreement on unfavorable commercial terms. If licensing agreements are not available on commercially acceptable terms, we could be precluded from making and selling the affected products, or could face
increased licensing costs. As new features are added to our products, we may need to acquire further licenses, including from new and sometimes unidentified owners of intellectual property. The cumulative costs of obtaining any necessary
licenses are difficult to predict and may over time have a material adverse effect on our operating results.
|
|
|
74 |
|
NOKIA ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 20-F 2016 |
Our business is subject to direct and indirect regulation. As a result, changes in various types of regulations or
their application, as well as economic and trade policies applicable to current or new technologies or products, may adversely affect our business and results of operations. Our governance, internal controls and compliance processes could also
fail to prevent regulatory penalties, both at operating subsidiaries and in joint ventures.
Our business is subject to direct and indirect regulation in
each of the countries and regions where we, the companies with which we collaborate and our customers operate. We develop many of our products based on existing regulations and technical standards, our interpretation of unfinished technical
standards or, in certain cases, in the absence of applicable regulations and standards. As a result, changes in various types of regulations or their application, as well as economic and trade policies applicable to current or new technologies
or products, may adversely affect our business and results of operations. For example, changes in regulation affecting the construction of base stations and other network infrastructure could adversely affect the timing and costs of new network
constructions or the expansion and commercial launch and ultimate commercial success of such networks. Also, changes in applicable privacy-related regulatory frameworks or their application may adversely affect our business, including possible
changes that increase costs, limit or restrict possibilities to offer products or services, or reduce or could be seen to reduce the privacy aspects of our offerings, including if further governmental interception capabilities or regulations aimed
at allowing governmental access to data are required for the products and services that we offer. An increase in the protectionist stances of governments around the world, which impact the free flow of data across borders, is already affecting
our global service delivery model and, due to the increase in terrorism (including cyber terrorism), we expect that the adoption of data localization, national sourcing and national hiring regulations and policies will increase. An
increase in regulation of digital telecommunications, especially in the European Union, might impose additional costs or burdens on our customers and on Nokia itself. Our operations and employee recruitment and retention depend on our ability to
obtain the necessary visas and work permits for our employees to travel and work in the jurisdictions in which we operate. Restrictive government policies, such as
limitations on visas, may make it difficult for us to move our employees into and out of these jurisdictions. Changes in
political regimes will also likely impact the way Nokia does business, due to potential changes in trade, cybersecurity, telecommunications, immigration and environmental policies.
Moreover, countries could require governmental interception capabilities or regulations aimed at allowing governmental access to data that could adversely affect
us by reducing our sales to such markets or limiting our ability to use components or software that we have developed or sourced from other companies. Furthermore, our business and results of operations may be adversely affected by
regulation, as well as economic and trade policies favoring the local industry participants, as well as other measures with potentially protectionist objectives that host governments in various countries may take, particularly in response
to challenging global economic conditions or following changes in political regimes. The impact of changes in or uncertainties related to regulation and trade policies could affect our business and results of operations adversely or
indirectly in certain cases where the specific regulations do not directly apply to us or our products and services.
The regulatory, exports and sanctions
legal environment can also be difficult to navigate for companies with global operations. Our ability to protect our intellectual property and generate intellectual property-related net sales is dependent on regulatory developments in
various jurisdictions, as well as the application of the regulations, for instance through administrative bodies. Export control, tariffs or other fees or levies imposed on our products and environmental, health, product safety and data protection,
security, consumer protection, money laundering and other regulations that adversely affect the export, import, technical design, pricing or costs of our products could also adversely affect our sales and results of operations. Additionally, changes
in various types of regulations or their application with respect to taxation or other fees collected by governments or governmental agencies may result in unexpected payment obligations, and in response to prevailing difficult global economic
conditions there may be an increased aggressiveness in collecting such fees. We may be subject to new, existing or tightened export control regulations, sanctions, embargoes or other forms of economic and trade restrictions imposed on certain
countries. Such actions may trigger additional investigations, including tax audits
by authorities or claims by contracting parties. The results and costs of such investigations or claims may be
difficult to predict and could lead to lengthy disputes, fines or fees, indemnities or a costly settlement.
Our provision of services and adaptation
of Cloud-based solutions has resulted in us being exposed to a variety of new regulatory issues or different exposure to regulatory issues (e.g., related to data privacy) and makes us subject to increased regulatory scrutiny. Our current
business models rely on certain centralized data processing solutions and Cloud or remote delivery-based services for distribution of services and software or data storage. Cloud and remote delivery-based business models and operations have
certain inherent risks, including those stemming from potential security breaches, and applicable regulatory regimes may cause limitations in implementing such business models or expose us to adverse effects stemming for instance from
regulatory or contractual issues, including penalties, fines, sanctions and limitations on conducting business. Moreover, our competitors have employed and will likely continue to employ significant resources to shape the legal and regulatory
regimes in countries where we have significant operations. Governments and regulators may make legal and regulatory changes or interpret and apply existing laws in ways that make our products and services less appealing to end users or require
us to incur substantial costs, change our business practices or prevent us from offering our products and services.
We operate on a global scale and our business
and activities cover multiple jurisdictions and are subject to complex regulatory frameworks. Current international trends show increased enforcement activity and enforcement initiatives in areas such as competition law, privacy, cybersecurity
and anti-corruption. Despite our Group-wide annual ethical business training and other measures, we may not be able to prevent breaches of law or governance standards within our business, subsidiaries and joint ventures.
Nokia is a publicly listed company and, as such, subject to various securities and accounting rules and regulations. Improper accounting practices, accounting errors or
misjudgment by management could have a material adverse effect on us. Accordingly, Nokia must continue to monitor and assess its internal control over financial reporting and its compliance with the applicable rules and regulations. We have
identified two material
|
|
|
NOKIA ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 20-F 2016 |
|
75 |
Risk factors continued
weaknesses in our internal controls over financial reporting. Refer to We have identified material
weaknesses in our internal control over financial reporting following the Acquisition of Alcatel Lucent which, if not remediated, could have a material adverse effect on us for more information on the identified material weakness.
We have identified material weaknesses in our internal control over financial reporting following the Acquisition of Alcatel Lucent which, if not remediated, could
have a material adverse effect on us.
Our integration activities in connection with the Acquisition of Alcatel Lucent are ongoing. In connection with the
preparation of our consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2016, our management identified two material weaknesses in the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting related to (1) the
accounting for income taxes at a former Alcatel Lucent entity in the United States and (2) the accounting and control functions at a former Alcatel Lucent subsidiary in China.
As permitted by applicable regulations and accounting rules, Nokias internal controls effectiveness assessment in 2016 did not include Alcatel Lucents
legacy operations. Our operating subsidiaries or our joint ventures failure, or a failure to integrate the Alcatel Lucent legacy operations into our internal controls framework, could adversely affect the accuracy and timeliness of our
financial reporting, which could result, for instance, in loss of confidence in us or in the accuracy and completeness of our financial reports, or otherwise in the imposition of fines or other regulatory measures, which could have a material
adverse effect on us. Moreover, we may identify further control deficiencies that are material weaknesses in the future.
A material weakness is a
deficiency, or combination of deficiencies, in internal control over financial reporting such that there is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of our annual or interim consolidated financial statements will not be prevented
or detected on a timely basis. We may be unable to establish and implement a plan to remediate these material weaknesses within the anticipated timeframe. If we are unable to remediate the material weaknesses described above, or any other
subsequently identified material weaknesses, our ability to record, process and report financial information accurately could be adversely affected. The occurrence of or failure to remediate the material weaknesses, or any other subsequently
identified material weaknesses, could have a material adverse effect on our financial position or business.
We are exposed to risks related to information security. Our business model relies on solutions for distribution
of services and software or data storage, which entail inherent risks relating to applicable regulatory regimes, cybersecurity breaches and other unauthorized access to network data or other potential security risks that may adversely affect our
business.
We are exposed to information security-related risk, for instance as our business and operations rely on confidentiality of proprietary information
as well as sensitive information, for instance related to our employees. Also, our business models rely on certain centralized data processing solutions and Cloud or remote delivery-based services for distribution of services and software
or data storage. The Cloud or remote delivery-based business models and operations have certain inherent risks, including those stemming from potential security breaches and applicable regulatory regimes, which may cause
limitations in implementing Cloud or remote delivery-based models or expose us to regulatory or contractual sanctions.
Although we endeavor to develop
products and services that meet the appropriate security standards, including effective data protection, we or our products and online services, marketing and developer sites may be subject to cybersecurity breaches, including hacking, viruses,
worms and other malicious software, unauthorized modifications, or illegal activities that may cause potential security risks and other harm to us, our customers or consumers and other end-users of our products and services. IT is rapidly
evolving, the techniques used to obtain unauthorized access or sabotage systems change frequently and the parties behind cyber-attacks and other industrial espionage are believed to be sophisticated and have extensive resources, and it is not
commercially or technically feasible to mitigate all known vulnerabilities in a timely manner or to eliminate all risk of cyber-attacks and data breaches. Additionally, we contract with multiple third parties in various jurisdictions who collect and
use certain data on our behalf. Although we have processes in place designed to ensure appropriate collection, handling and use of such data, third parties may use the data inappropriately or breach laws and agreements in collecting,
handling or using or leaking such data. This could lead to lengthy legal proceedings or fines imposed on us, as well as adverse effects to our reputation and brand value.
In connection with providing products and services to our customers and consumers, certain customer feedback,
information on consumer usage patterns and other personal and consumer data are collected, stored and processed through us, either by us or by our business partners or subcontractors. Loss, improper disclosure or leakage of any
personal or consumer data collected by us or which is available to our partners or subcontractors, made available to us or stored in or through our products, could have a material adverse effect on us and harm our reputation and
brand. We have outsourced a significant portion of our IT operations, as well as the network and information systems that we sell to third parties or for whose security and reliability we may otherwise be accountable. Additionally,
governmental authorities may use our networks products to access the personal data of individuals without our involvement; for example, through the so-called lawful intercept capabilities of network infrastructure. Even the perception that our
products do not adequately protect personal or consumer data collected by us, made available to us or stored in or through our products or that they are being used by third parties to access personal or consumer data could impair our sales, results
of operations, reputation and brand value.
Additionally, cyber-attacks can be difficult to prevent, detect or contain. We cannot rule out the possibility
that there may have been cyber-attacks that have been successful and/or evaded our detection. We continue to invest in risk mitigating actions; however, there can be no assurance that such investments and actions will prevent
or detect future cyber-attacks.
Our business is also vulnerable to theft, fraud or other forms of deception, sabotage and intentional acts of vandalism
by third parties and employees. Unauthorized access to or modification, misappropriation or loss of our intellectual property and confidential information could result in litigation and potential liability to customers, suppliers and other
third parties, harm our competitive position, reduce the value of our investment in R&D and other strategic initiatives or damage our brand and reputation, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations or
financial condition. Additionally, the cost and operational consequences of implementing further information system protection measures (especially if prescribed by national authorities) could be significant.
|
|
|
76 |
|
NOKIA ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 20-F 2016 |
We may not be successful in implementing such measures in due time, which could cause business disruptions and be
more expensive, time consuming and resource-intensive. Such disruptions could adversely impact our business.
As our business operations, including those
we have outsourced, rely on complex IT systems and networks (and related services), our reliance on the precautions taken by external companies to ensure the reliability of our and their IT systems, networks and related services is increasing.
Consequently, certain disruptions in IT systems and networks affecting our external providers could have a material adverse effect on our business.
Inefficiencies, breaches, malfunctions or disruptions of information technology systems and processes could have a material adverse effect on our business
and results of operations.
Our operations rely on the efficient and uninterrupted operation of complex and centralized IT systems, networks and processes,
which are integrated with those of third parties. Additionally, certain personal, consumer and customer data is stored and processed on our IT service providers equipment as part of our business operations. All IT systems, networks
and processes are potentially vulnerable to damage, breaches, malfunction or interruption from a variety of sources. We are, to a significant extent, relying on third parties for the provision of IT services. We may experience disruptions if
our partners do not deliver as expected or if we are unable to successfully manage systems and processes together with our business partners. The ongoing trend to Cloud-based architectures and network function virtualization has introduced further
complexity and associated risk.
We are constantly seeking to improve the quality and security of our IT systems. For instance, we have introduced new significant
IT solutions in recent years and outsourced certain functions, increasing our dependence on the reliability of external providers as well as the security of communication with them. We will often need to use new service providers and may,
due to technical developments or choices regarding technology, increase our reliance on certain new technologies, such as Cloud or remote delivery on demand-based services and certain other services that are used over the internet rather than
using a traditional licensing model. Switching to new service providers and introducing new technologies is inherently risky and may expose us to an
increased risk of disruptions in our operations, for instance, due to network inefficiency, a cybersecurity breach,
malfunctions or other disruptions resulting from IT systems and processes. Our integration of Alcatel Lucent and the resulting homogenization of our IT landscapes and processes may also result in potential security, business continuity
and efficiency risks.
We pursue various measures in order to manage our risks related to system and network malfunctions and disruptions, including the use of
multiple suppliers and their strong technical and contractual engagements in IT security. However, despite precautions taken by us, any malfunction or disruption of our current or future systems or networks, such as an outage in a
telecommunications network used by any of our IT systems, or a breach of our cybersecurity, such as an attack, malware or other event that leads to an unanticipated interruption or malfunction of our IT systems, processes, networks or data
leakages, could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and brand value. Additionally, if we fail to successfully secure our IT, this may have a material adverse effect on our business and results
of operations. A disruption of services relying on our IT, for instance, could cause significant discontent among users resulting in claims, contractual penalties or deterioration of our brand value.
Our products are also highly complex and defects in their design, manufacture and associated hardware, software and content have occurred in the past and may continue
to occur in the future. Defects and other quality issues may result from, among other things, failure in our own product manufacturing and service creation and delivery, as well as failure of our suppliers to comply with our requirements, or
failures in products and services created jointly with business partners or other third parties where the development and manufacturing process is not fully within our control. Quality issues may cause, for instance, delays in deliveries, loss
of intellectual property, liabilities for network outages, court fees and fines due to breaches of significantly increasing regulatory privacy requirements and related negative publicity, and additional repair, product replacement or warranty costs
to us, and harm our reputation and our ability to sustain or obtain business with our current and potential customers. With respect to our services, quality issues may relate to the challenges of having the services fully operational at the time
they are made available to our customers and maintaining them on an ongoing basis.
We make provisions to cover our estimated warranty costs for our products. We believe our provisions are
appropriate, although the ultimate outcome may differ from the provisions that are provided for, which could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations, particularly profitability and financial condition.
Our Nokia Technologies business group aims to generate net sales and profitability through licensing of the Nokia brand and technologies, the development and
sales of products and services, especially in the areas of digital media and digital health, as well as other business ventures including technology innovation and incubation, which may not materialize as planned or at all.
Our Nokia Technologies business group pursues various business opportunities building on our innovations and the Nokia brand. In addition to patent licensing, the Nokia
Technologies business group is focused on generating net sales and profits through business ventures related to Nokia brand licensing, digital media and digital health, as well as other business ventures including technology innovation and
incubation, focused on developing new ideas and prototypes.
In 2016, Nokia Technologies continued to implement its strategy, for instance in the digital
health area, through the acquisition of Withings to combine the expertise from Withings with that of Nokia Technologies. Refer to OverviewStrategy and Business OverviewOur businessesNokia
Technologies for more information. However, there can be no assurance that we will receive the intended benefits from the Withings acquisition; for instance, we may not be able to maintain or increase the sales of the business acquired though
the Withings acquisition. Competition in the consumer health market is intensifying, and Nokia Technologies needs to continue innovating, building differentiating technologies, and creating competitive health products that respond to consumer needs
and deliver on brand promise. There can be no assurances that we are able to reach our targets with respect to growing the business, including being able to successfully make the right strategic bets and investments, including choices for
the growth segments, product categories, product portfolio, target consumer segments, sales and marketing expansion, scaling up the supply chain and manufacturing, and strategic partnerships.
|
|
|
NOKIA ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 20-F 2016 |
|
77 |
Risk factors continued
Nokia Technologies also announced in 2016 a strategic agreement covering branding rights and intellectual property
licensing with HMD Global. Refer to OverviewStrategy and Business OverviewOur businessesNokia Technologies for more information. Under the agreement, Nokia will receive royalty payments from HMD Global for
sales of Nokia branded mobile phones and tablets, covering both brand and intellectual property rights. As such, the amount of income for Nokia is dependent on the business and success of HMD Global. There can be no assurance that we will
successfully reach additional new brand licensing arrangements at all or on terms that prove satisfactory to us. The agreement with HMD Global limits Nokias possibilities to license the Nokia brand for certain types of devices over an
agreed time and as such limiting Nokias licensing possibilities with respect to such devices.
Additionally, licensing the Nokia brand to HMD Global or
licensing the Nokia brand to other manufacturers couldin cases where the licensee acts inconsistently with our ethical, compliance or quality standards negatively affect our reputation and the value of our brand, thus diminishing the
business potential with respect to utilizing our brand for licensing opportunities or otherwise having a negative effect on our business. Nokia is not an investor or shareholder of HMD Global and Nokia has limitations in its ability to influence HMD
Global in its business and other operations, exposing Nokia to potential adverse effects from the use of the Nokia brand by HMD Global or other adverse developments encountered by HMD Global that become attributable to Nokia though association and
HMD Global being a licensee of the Nokia brand.
The Nokia Technologies business group develops and licenses various innovations as well as developing its own
products and services, including the OZO VR camera and Digital Health-related products. The manufacturing and selling of devices and services can expose us to risks, including product liability claims, claims from contract manufacturers and
negative consumer feedback. The Digital Health device portfolio encompasses connected health devices, such as scales, watches, trackers, blood pressure monitors and thermometers, as well as sleep and home products. Even though the quality control
and customer service of the devices follow industry best practices and the devices are certified per the markets they are sold, there is a possibility of actual or claimed
device or software malfunctions resulting, for instance, in recalls, negative consumer feedback, leakage of
consumer data and brand deterioration, as well as litigation or claims for compensation.
The industries in which we operate, or may operate in the future, are
generally fast-paced, rapidly evolving and innovative. Such industries are at different levels of maturity, and there can be no assurances that any investment we make will yield an expected return or result in the intended benefits.
Our business will likely require significant well-placed investments to innovate and grow successfully. Such investments may include R&D, licensing arrangements, acquiring businesses and technologies, recruiting specialized expertise and
partnering with third parties. Such investments may not, however, result in technologies, products or services that achieve or retain broad or timely market acceptance or are preferred by our customers and consumers. Additionally, we are
entering into new business areas based on our technology assets and may explore new business ventures. Such business areas or plans may be adversely affected by adverse industry and market developments in the numerous diverse markets in
which we operate, as well as by general economic conditions globally and regionally. As such, the investments may not be profitable or achieve the targeted rates of return. There can be no assurances that we will be able to identify and understand
the key market trends and user segments enabling us to address customers and consumers expanding needs in order to bring new innovative and competitive products and services to market in a timely manner.
There can be no assurances that our Nokia Technologies business group will be successful in innovation and incubation or in generating net sales and profits
through its business plans, for instance in technology and brand licensing, or products in the areas of digital media and digital health. Additionally, entering into new business areas may expose us to additional liabilities or claims, for
instance through product liability or other regulatory frameworks and related government investigations, litigation, penalties or fines.
We are subject to various legislative frameworks and jurisdictions that regulate fraud, as well as economic sanctions
and trade policies and, as such, the extent and outcome of possible proceedings concerning such issues are difficult to estimate with any certainty and we may be subject to material fines, penalties and other sanctions as a result of such
investigations.
As a global company, we are subject to various legislative frameworks and jurisdictions that regulate fraud committed in the course of business
operations, as well as economic sanctions and, as such, the extent and outcome of possible proceedings are difficult to estimate with any certainty. Anti-corruption laws in effect in many countries prohibit companies and their intermediaries from
making improper payments to public officials for the purpose of obtaining new business or maintaining existing business relationships. Certain anti-corruption laws such as the United States Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA) also
require the maintenance of proper books and records, and the implementation of controls and procedures in order to ensure that a companys operations do not involve corrupt payments. Since we operate throughout the world, and given that
some of our clients are government-owned entities and that our projects and agreements often require approvals from public officials, there is a risk that our employees, consultants or agents may take actions that are in violation of our
policies and of anti-corruption laws. In many parts of the world where we currently operate or seek to expand our business, local practices and customs may be in contradiction to our policies, including the Nokia Code of Conduct, and could
violate anti-corruption laws, including the FCPA and the UK Bribery Act 2010, and applicable European Union regulations, as well as applicable economic sanctions and embargoes. Our employees, or other parties acting on our behalf, could violate
policies and procedures intended to promote compliance with anti-corruption laws or economic sanctions. Violations of these laws by our employees or other parties acting on our behalf, regardless of whether we had participated in such acts
or had knowledge of such acts at certain levels within our organization, could result in us or our employees becoming subject to criminal or civil enforcement actions, including fines or penalties, disgorgement of profits and suspension or
disqualification of sales. Additionally, violations of law or allegations of violations may result in reputational harm and loss of business and adversely affect our brand and reputation. Detecting, investigating
|
|
|
78 |
|
NOKIA ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 20-F 2016 |
and resolving such situations may also result in significant costs, including the need to engage external advisers,
and consume significant time, attention and resources from our management and other key employees. The results and costs of such investigations or claims may be difficult to predict and could lead to, for instance, lengthy disputes, fines, fees
or indemnities, costly settlement or the deterioration of the Nokia brand.
As Nokia acquired Alcatel Lucent, any issues with its operations may be
attributed to Nokia. In the past, Alcatel Lucent has experienced both actual and alleged violations of anti-corruption laws. As a result of FCPA violations in the past, Alcatel Lucent had to pay substantial amounts to the United States Securities
and Exchange Commission in disgorgement of profits and interest, and to the United States Department of Justice in criminal fines. Additionally, Alcatel Lucent had to make certain payments to the Costa Rican Attorney General and the
Instituto Costarricense de Electricidad to settle anti-corruption claims in Costa Rica. With respect to the French authorities investigation into corruption activities by Alcatel Lucent and certain of its subsidiaries in Costa Rica
(dating back to 2004 and that gave rise to criminal procedures and settlements in Costa Rica and the United States, and which were made public in prior Alcatel Lucent disclosures), the French investigating magistrate on May 24, 2016
ordered that Alcatel Lucent be indicted for violation of the French Criminal Code. The indictment alleges that payments were made on behalf of Alcatel Lucent to Costa Rican officials and executives in order to obtain fixed and mobile
telecommunications contracts. If ultimately Alcatel Lucent was found guilty, the maximum penalty to be incurred is expected to be EUR 750 000 and the exclusion of this non-commercial legal entity from bidding for French public procurement
contracts.
We may also be subject to claims, fines, investigations or assessments for conduct that we failed to or were unable to discover or identify
in the course of performing our due diligence investigations of Alcatel Lucent prior to the acquisition, including unknown or unasserted liabilities and issues relating to fraud, non-compliance with applicable laws and regulations,
improper accounting policies or other improper activities. For example, after the Acquisition of Alcatel Lucent, we identified improper conduct and related material weakness in the control environment at an Alcatel Lucent subsidiary in China;
if we fail to remediate the material weakness in the accounting and control functions at this subsidiary, the conduct may have an adverse impact on our business, results of operations and financial condition.
Alcatel Lucent is also subject to certain other ongoing investigations and proceedings in France and other countries,
which may result in further material damages, fines, penalties and other sanctions, and in its inability to participate in certain public procurement agreements in those countries.
There can be no assurance that we would not be subject to material fines, penalties and other sanctions as a result of similar events outlined in this risk
factor. Any damages, fines, penalties or other sanctions attributable to us could have a material adverse effect on our brand, reputation or financial position.
We may be adversely affected by developments with respect to the customer financing or extended payment terms that we provide our customers.
Mobile operators in certain markets may require their suppliers, including us, to arrange, facilitate or provide financing in order to obtain sales or business.
They may also require extended payment terms. In certain cases, the amounts and duration of these financings and trade credits, and the associated impact on our working capital, may be significant. Requests for customer financing and extended
payment terms are typical for our industry.
Uncertainty in the financial markets may result in increased customer financing requests. As a strategic
marketing requirement, we arrange and facilitate financing or provide extended payment terms to a number of our customers, typically supported by export credit or guarantee agencies or through the sale of related receivables. In the event that
export credit agencies face future constraints on their ability or willingness to provide financing to our customers, or there is insufficient demand to purchase their receivables, such events could have a material adverse effect on our
business and financial condition. We have agreed to extended payment terms for a number of our customers, and may continue to do so in the future. Extended payment terms may continue to result in a material aggregate amount of trade
credits. Even when the associated risk is mitigated by a diversified customer portfolio, defaults in the aggregate could have a material adverse effect on us.
We
cannot guarantee that we will be successful in arranging, facilitating or providing required financing, including extended payment terms to our customers, particularly in difficult financial conditions on the market. Additionally, certain of
our
competitors may have greater access to credit financing, which could adversely affect our ability to compete successfully
for business opportunities in the markets in which we operate. Our ability to manage our total customer financing and trade credit exposure depends on a number of factors, including capital structure, market conditions affecting our customers, the
levels and terms of credit available to us and to our customers, the cooperation of export credit or guarantee agencies and our ability to mitigate exposure on acceptable terms. We may be unsuccessful in managing the challenges associated with the
customer financing and trade credit exposure that we may face from time to time. While defaults under financings, guarantees and trade credits to our customers resulting in impairment charges and credit losses have not been significant for us in the
past, these may increase in the future, and commercial banks may not continue to be able or willing to provide sufficient long-term financing, even if backed by export credit agency guarantees, due to their own liquidity constraints.
We have sold certain receivables to banks or other financial institutions to mitigate the payment risk and improve our liquidity, and any significant change
in our ability to continue this practice could impair our capability to mitigate such payment risk and to manage our liquidity.
We may not be able to
collect outstanding guarantees and bonds that could limit our possibilities to issue new guarantees and/or bonds, which are required in customer agreements or practices. We also face risks that such commercial guarantees and bonds may be
unfairly called.
We have operations in a number of countries and, consequently, risk facing complex tax issues and disputes and could be obligated to
pay additional taxes in various jurisdictions.
We operate in a number of jurisdictions, which involve different tax regimes and application of rules
related to taxation. Applicable taxes such as income taxes, as well as indirect taxes and social taxes, for which we make provisions, could increase significantly as a result of changes in applicable tax laws in the countries in which we
operate, the interpretation of such laws by local tax authorities could drastically change or tax audits may be performed by local tax authorities. The impact of these factors is dependent on the types of revenue and mix of profit we generate
in various countries, for instance, income from sales of products or services may have different tax treatments.
|
|
|
NOKIA ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 20-F 2016 |
|
79 |
Risk factors continued
While we have made provisions for certain tax issues, the provisions we have made may not be adequate to cover such
increases.
We are subject to income taxes in multiple jurisdictions. Our business and the investments we make globally, especially in emerging
markets, are subject to uncertainties, including unfavorable or unpredictable changes in tax laws (possibly with retroactive effect in certain cases), taxation treatment and regulatory proceedings, including tax audits. For instance,
during early 2013 we were subject to a tax investigation in India, focusing on Indian tax consequences of payments made within Nokia for the supply of operating software from our parent company in Finland. Such proceedings can be lengthy,
involve actions that can hinder local operations and affect unrelated parts of our business, and the outcome of such proceedings is difficult to predict.
Our
Acquisition of Alcatel Lucent may still result in adverse tax consequences arising from a change of ownership of Alcatel Lucent, including, but not limited to, stamp duties, land transfer taxes, franchise taxes and other levies. Additionally,
there may be other potential tax consequences related to the Acquisition of Alcatel Lucent of which we are not currently aware, which may result in significant tax consequences now or in the future.
Adverse developments or outcomes of such proceedings could have a material adverse effect on our cash flow and financial position. We are required to indemnify
Microsoft for certain tax liabilities, including (i) tax liabilities for the Nokia entities acquired by Microsoft in connection with the closing of the Sale of the D&S Business, (ii) the assets acquired by Microsoft attributable
to tax periods ending on or prior to the closing date of the closing of the Sale of the D&S Business, (iii) a certain pre-closing portion of any taxable period that includes the closing date of the Sale of the D&S Business and
(iv) taxes imposed with respect to any asset not acquired by Microsoft in connection with the Sale of the D&S Business. We are also required to indemnify the Consortium for certain tax liabilities, including tax liabilities for the HERE
entities acquired by the Consortium in connection with the closing of the Sale of the HERE Business attributable to (i) tax periods ending on or prior to the closing date of the closing of the Sale of the HERE Business, and (ii) a certain
pre-closing portion of any taxable period that includes the closing date of the Sale of the HERE Business.
There may also be unforeseen tax expenses that may turn out to have an unfavorable impact on us. As a result, and given
the inherent unpredictable nature of taxation, there can be no assurance that our tax rate will remain at the current level or that cash flows regarding taxes will be stable.
Our actual or anticipated performance, among other factors, could reduce our ability to utilize our deferred tax assets.
Deferred tax assets recognized on tax losses, unused tax credits and tax deductible temporary differences are dependent on our ability to offset such items
against future taxable income within the relevant tax jurisdiction. Such deferred tax assets are also based on our assumptions on future taxable earnings and these may not be realized as expected, which may cause the deferred tax assets to be
materially reduced. There can be no assurances that an unexpected reduction in deferred tax assets will not occur. Any such reduction could have a material adverse effect on us. Additionally, our earnings have in the past been and may in the future
continue to be unfavorably affected in the event that no tax benefits are recognized for certain deferred tax items.
It is also possible that the Acquisition of
Alcatel Lucent will result in adverse tax consequences following the change of ownership of Alcatel Lucent. The tax consequences of a change of ownership of a corporation can lead to an inability to carry-over certain tax attributes,
including, but not limited to, tax losses, tax credits and tax basis of assets.
We may be unable to retain, motivate, develop and recruit appropriately
skilled employees.
Our success is dependent on our ability to retain, motivate, develop (through periodic competence training) and recruit
appropriately skilled employees. The market for skilled employees and leaders in our business is extremely competitive.
We aim to create a corporate culture that
is motivational, based on equal opportunities and encourages creativity and continuous learning, as competition for skilled employees remains intense. Our workforce has fluctuated significantly over recent years as we have introduced changes in our
strategy to respond to our business targets and endeavors. Such changes and uncertainty have caused and may in the future cause disruption and dissatisfaction among employees, as well as
fatigue due to the cumulative effect of several reorganizations over the past years and our efforts to implement the new
operational structure of our business following the Acquisition of Alcatel Lucent. As a result, employee motivation, energy, focus, morale and productivity may be reduced, causing inefficiencies and other problems across the organization
resulting in the loss of key employees and increased costs in resolving and addressing such matters. Reorganizations and strategic changes may also result in key employees leaving us or resource gaps, certain of which may only be noticed after
a certain period of time or which negatively impact the relationship with customers, vendors or other business partners. If the strategic direction or our business is perceived adversely by our employees, this may result in a heightened
risk of being unable to retain or recruit employees. Moreover, our employees may be targeted aggressively by our competitors, particularly due to changes in our strategy or to the Acquisition of Alcatel Lucent, and certain employees may be more
receptive to such offers, resulting in the loss of key individuals. Accordingly, we may need to adjust our compensation and benefit policies and take other measures to attract, retain and motivate skilled employees to align with the changes to our
culture and business in order to implement our new strategies successfully.
Implementing new organizational structures may entail plans to relocate or lay off
employees, close or consolidate sites or outsource parts of the business operations. Such strategy-related changes may result in implementation costs, as well as displacement or insecurity among employees resulting in the inability to retain
required skills and key employees, resulting in resource gaps and which could have a material adverse effect on our operations. Also, planned efforts to rebalance our workforce may not be completed as planned and may result in larger than
expected costs, or we may not be able to complete such efforts as planned, for instance, due to legal restrictions, resulting in a non-optimal workforce that could hinder our ability to reach targeted cost savings. Succession
planning, especially with respect to key employees and leaders, is crucial to avoid business disruptions and to ensure the appropriate transfer of knowledge. We have, and may from time to time, acquire businesses or complete other transactions
where retaining key employees may be crucial to obtain the intended benefits of such transactions. We must ensure that key
|
|
|
80 |
|
NOKIA ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 20-F 2016 |
employees of such acquired businesses are retained and appropriately motivated. However, there can be no assurances
that we will be able to implement measures successfully to retain or hire the required employees. We believe this will require significant time, attention and resources from our senior management and other key employees within our
organization and may result in increased costs. We have encountered, and may in the future encounter, shortages of appropriately skilled employees or lose key employees or senior management, which may hamper our ability to implement our
strategies and may have a material adverse effect on our business and results of operations.
Relationships with employee representatives are generally managed at
the site level in accordance with country-specific legislation and most collective bargaining agreements have been in place for several years. Our inability to negotiate successfully with employee representatives or failures in our
relationships with such representatives could result in strikes by the employees, increased operating costs as a result of higher wages or benefits paid to employees as the result of such strike or other industrial action or inability
to implement changes to our organization and operational structure in the planned timeframe or expense level, or at all. If our employees were to engage in a strike or other work stoppage, we could experience a significant disruption in our
day-to-day operations and higher ongoing labor costs, which could have a material adverse effect on our business and results of operations.
We may face
problems or disruptions in our manufacturing, service creation, delivery, logistics or supply chain. Additionally, adverse events may have a profound impact on production sites or the production sites of our suppliers, which are geographically
concentrated.
Our product manufacturing, service creation and delivery, as well as our logistics, or the components of such activities that we have outsourced
to third parties, expose us to various risks and potential liabilities, including those related to compliance with laws and regulations and exposure to environmental liabilities or other claims. Additionally, if we are subjected to negative
publicity with respect to the activities that we manage or that are managed by third parties, we may experience an adverse impact to our reputation that can have a negative effect, for instance, on our brand and sales. These
operations are continuously modified
in an effort to improve the efficiency and flexibility of our manufacturing, service creation and delivery, as well as
our logistics function and ability to produce, create and distribute continuously changing volumes. We, or third parties that we outsource services to, may experience difficulties in adapting our supply to meet the changing demand for our products
and services, ramping up and down production at our facilities, adjusting our network implementation capabilities as needed on a timely basis, maintaining an optimal inventory level, adopting new manufacturing processes, finding the most timely way
to develop the best technical solutions for new products, managing the increasingly complex manufacturing process, service creation and delivery process or achieving required efficiencies and flexibility.
Our manufacturing operations depend on obtaining sufficient quantities of fully functional products, components, sub-assemblies, software and services
on a timely basis. Our principal supply requirements for our products are for electronic components, mechanical components and software, which all have a wide range of applications in our products.
In certain cases, a particular component or service may be available only from a limited number of suppliers or from a single supplier in the supply chain. Our
product manufacturing, service creation and delivery, as well as our logistics, or the components of such activities that we have outsourced to third parties may also be adversely affected by various developments, including adverse changes in
trade policies or laws or regulations, geopolitical disturbances, pandemic outbreaks or other similar events. Additionally, our dependence on third-party suppliers has increased as a result of our strategic decisions to outsource certain
activities. Suppliers may from time to time extend lead times, limit supplies, change their partner preferences, increase prices, provide poor quality supplies or be unable to adapt to changes in demand due to capacity constraints or other
factors, which could adversely affect our ability to deliver our products and services on a timely basis. For example, our efforts to meet our customer needs during major network roll-outs in certain markets may require sourcing large volumes of
components and services from suppliers and vendors at short notice and simultaneously with our competitors. If we fail to properly anticipate customer demand,
an over-supply or under-supply of components and production or services delivery capacity could occur. In many cases,
some of our competitors utilize the same contract manufacturers, component suppliers and service vendors. If they have purchased capacity or components ahead of us, this could prevent us from acquiring the required components or services, which
could limit our ability to supply our customers or increase our costs.
We may not be able to secure components on attractive terms from our suppliers or
a supplier may fail to meet our supplier requirements, such as our and our customers product quality, safety, security and other standards. Consequently, some of our products may be unacceptable to us following failure to meet our quality
controls or unacceptable to our customers. We may also be subject to damages due to product liability claims arising from defective products and components or services that may need to be replaced. Also, certain suppliers may not comply
with local laws, including, among others, local labor laws. Additionally, a component supplier may experience delays or disruptions to our manufacturing processes or financial difficulties or even insolvency, bankruptcy or closure of our
business, in particular due to difficult economic conditions. We may experience challenges caused by third parties, or other external difficulties in connection with our efforts to modify our operations to improve the efficiency and flexibility
of our manufacturing, service creation and delivery, as well as our logistics, including, but not limited to, strikes, purchasing boycotts, public harm to our brand and claims for compensation resulting from our decisions on where to place
and how to utilize our manufacturing facilities. Such difficulties may result from, among other things, delays in adjusting production at our facilities, delays in expanding production capacity, failures in our manufacturing, service
creation and delivery, as well as logistics processes, failures in the activities we have outsourced, and interruptions in the data communication systems that run our operations. Any of these events could delay our successful and timely delivery of
products that meet our and our customers quality, safety, security and other requirements, cause delivery of insufficient or excess volumes compared to our own estimates or customer requirements, or otherwise have a material adverse
effect on our sales and results of operations or our reputation and brand value.
|
|
|
NOKIA ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 20-F 2016 |
|
81 |
Risk factors continued
Many of our production sites or the production sites of our suppliers are geographically concentrated, with a majority
of our suppliers based in Asia. Also we rely on efficient logistic chain elements, e.g. regional distribution hubs or transport chain elements (main ports, streets, and airways), which may be affected by various events, including natural
disasters, civil unrest, political instability or public health-related issues. In the event that any of these geographic areas are affected by any adverse conditions, such as natural disasters, geopolitical disruptions, civil unrest or health
crises that disrupt production or deliveries from our suppliers, our ability to deliver our products on a timely basis could be adversely affected, which may have a material adverse effect on our business and results of operations.
An unfavorable outcome of litigation, arbitrations, agreement-related disputes or product liability-related allegations against our business could have a
material adverse effect on us.
We are a party to lawsuits, arbitrations, agreement-related disputes and product liability-related allegations in the normal
course of our business. Litigation, arbitration or agreement-related disputes can be expensive, lengthy and disruptive to normal business operations and divert the efforts of our management. Moreover, the outcomes of complex legal
proceedings or agreement-related disputes are difficult to predict. An unfavorable resolution of a particular lawsuit, arbitration or agreement-related dispute could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of
operations, financial condition and reputation. We face additional exposure to lawsuits, arbitrations and agreement-related disputes following the Acquisition of Alcatel Lucent as a result of the increased scope of our business and operations. The
Acquisition of Alcatel Lucent, as well as any other transactions, could entail related adverse effects or result in organizational and other changes following the transactions, which could have a material adverse effect on our business and
operations.
The investment or acquisition decisions we make may subject us to litigation arising from minority
shareholders actions and investor dissatisfaction with the activities of our business. Shareholder disputes, if resolved against us, could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations as well as
expose us to disputes or litigation.
We record provisions for pending claims when we determine that an unfavorable outcome is likely and the loss can
reasonably be estimated. Due to the inherent uncertain nature of legal proceedings, the ultimate outcome or actual cost of settlement may materially differ from estimates. We believe our provisions for pending claims are appropriate. The ultimate
outcome, however, may differ from the provided estimate, which could have either a positive or an adverse impact on our results of operations and financial condition.
Although our products are designed to meet all relevant safety standards and recommendations globally, we cannot guarantee we will not become subject to product
liability claims or be held liable for such claims or be required to comply with future regulatory changes in this area, which could have a material adverse effect on our business and financial condition. We have been involved in
several lawsuits alleging adverse health effects associated with our products, including those caused by electromagnetic fields, and the outcome of such procedures is difficult to predict, including potentially significant fines or
settlements. Even a perceived risk of adverse health effects of mobile devices or base stations could have a material adverse effect on us through a reduction in the demand for mobile devices having an adverse effect, for instance, through a
decreased demand for mobile networks or increased difficulty in obtaining sites for base stations.
For a more detailed discussion of litigation to which we
are a party, refer to Note 29, Provisions, of our consolidated financial statements included in this annual report on Form 20-F.
We may not be able to optimize our capital structure as planned and re-establish our investment grade credit rating
or otherwise improve our credit ratings.
Moodys, Standard & Poors and other credit rating agencies have assigned credit ratings
to us. In the event that our credit rating is downgraded, financial costs to us could increase and thereby have a material adverse effect, for instance, on our business, financial condition or results of operations.
We have announced a capital structure optimization program and set a goal of re-establishing our investment grade credit rating. There can be no assurances that we
will be able to optimize our capital structure as planned or achieve an investment grade credit rating at the targeted time, or at all, or reduce our interest expenses.
Additionally, returning capital to shareholders reduces our capital available for operations and financing, which could expose us to financial difficulties or
require us to incur additional indebtedness under certain circumstances, which in turn could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition.
We may be unable to achieve targeted benefits from, or successfully implement, planned transactions or transactions may result in liabilities.
From time to time, we may consider possible transactions that could complement our existing operations and enable us to grow our business or divest our existing
businesses or operations. We have made a number of acquisitions and divestments, in addition to the recent Acquisition of Alcatel Lucent and the Sale of the HERE Business as well as the intended acquisition of Comptel. We may engage in further
transactions, such as acquisitions, divestments, mergers or joint ventures in the future. Additionally, we make investments to companies through certain investment funds, including Nokia Growth Partners, and there can be no assurance that such
investments will result in new successful technologies that we will be able to monetize.
We cannot provide any assurances that any transactions we initiate, such
as acquisitions, divestments, mergers or joint ventures, will ultimately be completed on favorable terms or provide the benefits or return on investment that we had originally anticipated. After reaching an agreement for a transaction, we may
need to satisfy pre-closing conditions on acceptable terms, which may prevent us from completing the transaction or result in changes to the scope of the transaction.
|
|
|
82 |
|
NOKIA ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 20-F 2016 |
Furthermore, we may not succeed in integrating acquired operations with our existing business.
In February 2017, we announced our intention to acquire Comptel through a recommended public cash tender offer. We may not be able to complete the acquisition of
Comptel in a timely manner, or at all, or obtain full ownership of Comptel for a number of reasons including competition for the acquisition.
Transactions,
including acquisitions, divestments, mergers or joint ventures, involve inherent risks, and the assumptions may be incorrect in evaluating a transaction. Therefore, we may be exposed to unknown or contingent liabilities of acquired businesses, such
as those related to contractual obligations, taxes, pensions, environmental liabilities, disputes and compliance matters. Additionally, there are multiple risks that can hamper or delay our ability to integrate acquired businesses and to
achieve identified and anticipated operating and financial synergies, including;
∎ |
unanticipated delays or inability to proceed with transactions as planned, for instance, due to issues in obtaining regulatory or shareholder approvals, completing public offers or proposals, the imposition of
conditions on the acquirer of a business to divest certain assets or impose other obligations due to competition laws or other regulations; |
∎ |
unanticipated costs or changes in scope, for instance, due to issues with regulators or courts imposing terms on a transaction or obstacles that result in changes required in the scope of the transaction;
|
∎ |
the diversion of management attention from the existing business; |
∎ |
the potential loss of key employees, customers and suppliers; |
∎ |
unanticipated changes in business, industry or general economic conditions that affect the assumptions underlying the acquisition; |
∎ |
potential disputes with sellers, purchasers or other counterparties; |
∎ |
impairments related to goodwill and other intangible assets, for instance, due to business performance after an acquisition or differences in evaluating the goodwill with respect to the acquired businesses;
|
∎ |
potential limitations on our ability to control any joint ventures; accordingly such transactions may result in increased exposure to operational, compliance, legal or financial risks; |
∎ |
unexpected costs associated with the separation of the business which is to be divested or with the integration of the business which is acquired; |
∎ |
additional payment obligations and higher costs resulting from non-performance by divested businesses; |
∎ |
exposure to contingent liabilities in connection with any indemnity we provide to the purchaser in connection with such divestment; |
∎ |
potential post-closing claims for indemnification and disputes with purchasers or sellers; |
∎ |
our dependence on some of the divested businesses as our suppliers in the future; and |
∎ |
high transaction costs. |
We sold our HERE business in a transaction that closed in late 2015. In connection with the
Sale of the HERE Business, we have committed to indemnify the buyers for the breach or violation of certain representations and warranties and covenants made by us in the HERE purchase agreement, subject to certain limitations. Significant
indemnification claims by the buyers with respect to the Sale of the HERE Business could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition. Furthermore, in connection with the Sale of the HERE Business, the intellectual property portfolio of
HERE was transferred to the buyers and, therefore, we no longer benefit from use of such intellectual property.
Significant transactions may result in claims
between the parties, which can consume time and management attention, and the outcome of disputes related to significant transactions may be difficult to predict.
We are involved in joint ventures and are exposed to risks inherent to companies under joint management.
We have certain joint ventures, including a significant joint venture in China, Alcatel-Lucent Shanghai Bell Co., Ltd, which is a consolidated subsidiary and
which has certain requirements and associated risks. We own 50% plus one share of Alcatel-Lucent Shanghai Bell Co., Ltd, the remainder being owned by China Huaxin, an entity controlled
by the Chinese government. The agreements related to our joint ventures may require unanimous consent or the affirmative
vote of a qualified majority of the shareholders to take certain actions, thereby possibly slowing down the decision-making process. In addition, joint venture companies involve inherent risks such as those associated with
a complex corporate governance structure, including lack of transparency and consequent risks of compliance breaches or other similar issues, or issues in dissolving such entities or divesting their shareholdings, assets and liabilities,
and also may involve negative public perceptions caused by the joint venture partner that are adverse to us.
Performance failures of our partners,
as well as failures to agree to partnering arrangements with third parties could adversely affect us.
If any of the companies we partner and
collaborate with were to fail to perform as expected, or if we fail to achieve the collaboration or partnering arrangements needed to succeed, we may be unable to bring our products, services or technologies to market successfully or in a
timely manner, which could have a material adverse effect on our operations. We are increasingly collaborating and partnering with third parties to develop technologies, products and services, as well as seeking new revenue streams through
partnering arrangements. We also depend on third-party partners in our efforts to monetize our brands, including the Nokia and Nokia Bell Labs brands and technologies, for instance, through arrangements where the brands are licensed to
third-party products and the product development and distribution are handled partly or in full by third parties. Additionally, we have outsourced various functions to third parties and are relying on them to provide certain services to us. These
arrangements involve the commitment of certain resources, including technology, R&D, services and employees. Although the objective of the collaborative and partnering arrangements is a mutually beneficial outcome for each party, our ability to
introduce and provide products and services that are commercially viable and meet our, our customers and consumers quality, safety, security and other standards in a timely manner could be hampered from performance or other
failures.
|
|
|
NOKIA ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 20-F 2016 |
|
83 |
Risk factors continued
For instance, in many areas, including finance and human resources-related arrangements, a failure to maintain an
efficient relationship with the selected partner may lead to ongoing operational problems or even to severe business disruptions, and we cannot give assurances that the availability of the processes and services upon which we rely will not be
interrupted, which could have a material adverse effect on our business operations, in particular related to the integration of Alcatel Lucent. Performance problems may result in missed reporting deadlines, financial losses, missed business
opportunities and reputational harm. In addition, as managements focus shifts from a direct to an indirect operational control in these areas, there is a risk that without active management and monitoring of the relationship, the
services provided may be below appropriate quality standards. Partners may not meet agreed service levels, in which case, depending on the impacted service, our contractual remedies may not fully cure all of the damages we may suffer. This is
particularly true for any deficiencies that would impact the reporting requirements applicable to us as a company listed on multiple stock exchanges.
In order to
implement outsourcing arrangements, we may be required to implement changes in our business practices and processes, for instance, to capture economies of scale and operational efficiencies, and to reflect a different way of doing business.
Consequently, business processes that were customized for individual business groups or for us generally may be converted to a more standardized format. During a transition to outsourcing, our employees may need to train the partners staff or
be trained in the partners systems, potentially resulting in the distraction of our employees. Adjustments to staff size and transfer of employees to the partners companies could have an adverse effect on us, for instance,
through impacting the morale of our employees and raising complex labor law issues and resulting in the loss of key personnel.
There is also a risk that we
may not be able to determine whether controls have been effectively implemented, and whether the partner companys performance monitoring reports are accurate. Concerns could equally arise from giving third parties access to confidential
data, strategic technology applications and books and records.
Additionally, we announced in 2016 a brand licensing partnership with HMD Global. HMD Global is responsible for
following our brand and quality guidelines. If HMD Global or other partners act inconsistently with our ethical, sustainability, compliance, brand, or quality standards, this can negatively affect our reputation, the value of our brand, and the
business outcome of our partnerships.
Additionally, partnering and outsourcing arrangements can create a dependency on the outsourcing company, causing issues
in our ability to learn from day-to-day responsibilities, gain hands-on experience and adapt to changing business needs.
The carrying amount of our
goodwill may not be recoverable.
We assess the carrying amount of goodwill annually, or more frequently if events or changes in circumstances indicate
that such carrying amount may not be recoverable. We assess the carrying amount of other identifiable assets if events or changes in circumstances indicate that their carrying amounts may not be recoverable. If we do not generate revenues from
our businesses as anticipated, our businesses may not generate sufficient positive operating cash flows. This, or other factors, may lead to a decrease in the value of our assets, including intangible assets and the goodwill attributed to our
businesses, resulting in impairment charges that may adversely affect our net profit for the year. While we believe the estimated recoverable values are reasonable, actual performance in the short- and long-term and our assumptions on which we base
our calculations could materially differ from our forecasts, which could impact future estimates of our businesses recoverable values, and may result in impairment charges.
The amount of dividend and equity return distributed to shareholders for each financial period is uncertain.
We cannot assure you that we will pay dividends or deliver return on equity on the shares issued by us, nor is there any assurance as to the amount of any dividend
or return of equity we may pay. The payment and the amount of any dividend or return of equity is subject to the discretion of our Board and, ultimately, the general meeting of our shareholders and will depend on available cash balances,
retained earnings, anticipated cash needs, the results of our operations and our financial condition and terms of outstanding indebtedness, as well as other relevant factors such as restrictions, prohibitions or limitations imposed by
applicable law.
We are exposed to pension, employee fund-related and employee healthcare-related risks and we may be unsuccessful
in our ability to avoid or control costs resulting from a need for increased funding.
We are exposed to various employee cost-related risks, including
those related to pension, employee fund-related obligations and employee healthcare-related risks. In the United States, we maintain significant employee pension benefit plans and a significant retiree benefit plan (providing
post-retirement healthcare benefits and post-retirement life insurance cover). Outside the United States, we contribute to pension schemes for large numbers of current and former employees. These plans/ schemes have funding requirements
that depend on, among other things, various legal requirements, how assets set aside to pay for those obligations are invested, the performance of financial markets, interest rates, assumptions regarding the life expectancy of covered employees
and retirees, and medical cost inflation and medical care utilization. To the extent that any of those variables change, the funding required for those plans/schemes may increase, and we may be unsuccessful in our ability to avoid or
control costs resulting from such increased funding requirements. Our inability to avoid or control such costs could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations and our financial position.
With respect to our employee costs and pension and other post-retirement obligations, we face the following risks, among others:
∎ |
|
financial market performance and volatility in asset values and discount rates affect the funded status of our pension obligations and could increase funding requirements, including legally required minimum
contributions; |
∎ |
|
our pension plan participants and post-retirement health plan participants may live longer than has been assumed, which would result in an increase in our benefit obligations. We cannot be certain that the longevity of
the participants in our pension plans or retiree healthcare plan will not exceed that indicated by the mortality tables we currently use or that future updates to those tables will not reflect materially longer life expectancies;
|
|
|
|
84 |
|
NOKIA ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 20-F 2016 |
∎ |
we may not be able to fund our United States post-retirement healthcare and group life insurance costs for our formerly represented retirees with excess pension assets. In accordance with Section 420
of the United States Internal Revenue Code, we currently fund, and expect to be able to continue to fund, our healthcare and group life insurance costs for retirees who, when actively employed, were represented by certain unions with transfers
of excess pension assets from our United States inactive occupational pension plan. Based on current actuarial assumptions and based on the present level and structure of benefits and of our benefit plans, we believe that we can continue to
fund this obligation. However, deterioration in the funded status of that pension plan could negatively affect our ability to make future Section 420 transfers. Section 420 is currently set to expire in 2025; and |
∎ |
increases in healthcare costs and an increase in the utilization of healthcare services may significantly increase our United States retiree healthcare costs. We may take steps in the future to reduce the overall
cost of our current retiree healthcare plans, and the share of the cost borne by the company, consistent with legal requirements and any collective bargaining obligations. However, cost increases may exceed the companys ability to
reduce these costs. Additionally, in the past, the reduction or elimination of United States retiree healthcare benefits by Alcatel Lucent resulted in lawsuits against Alcatel Lucent. Any initiatives that we might undertake to control these costs
could similarly result in claims against the company.
|
We engage in the installation and maintenance of undersea telecommunications cable networks, and in the
course of this activity we may cause damage to existing undersea infrastructure, for which we may ultimately be held responsible.
We engage in the supply
of submarine optical fiber cable networks linking mainland to islands, island to island or several points along a coast, with activities also expanding to the supply of broadband infrastructure to oil and gas platforms and other offshore
installations. Although thorough surveys, permit processes and safety procedures are implemented during the planning and deployment phases of all of these activities, there is a risk that previously-laid infrastructure, such as electric cables or
oil pipelines, may go undetected despite such precautions, and be damaged during the process of installing the telecommunications cable, potentially causing business interruption to third parties operating in the same area and accidental
pollution or other disturbances or damage to the environment. While we have contractual limitations in place and maintain insurance coverage to limit our exposure, we cannot provide any assurance that these protections will be
sufficient to cover such exposure entirely.
|
|
|
NOKIA ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 20-F 2016 |
|
85 |
Shares and
share capital
Nokia has one class of shares. Each Nokia share entitles the holder to one vote at General Meetings
of Nokia.
As of December 31, 2016, the total number of Nokia shares was 5 836 055 012 and our share capital equaled
EUR 245 896 461.96. As of December 31, 2016, Nokia and its subsidiary companies owned a total of 115 551 878 Nokia shares, representing approximately 2% of the total number of the shares and voting rights of
the company.
In 2016, under an authorization held by the Board, we issued in deviation from shareholders pre-emptive rights to subscription 1 842 158
031 shares in exchange for the Alcatel Lucent ordinary shares, ADSs and OCEANE convertible bonds to effect the business combination with Alcatel Lucent. The number of shares issued consisted of 1 831 136 063 new shares and 11 021 968 treasury
shares.
In 2016, under the authorization held by the Board, we issued a total of 3 408 437 treasury shares to our employees, including certain members of the
Group Leadership Team, as settlement under Nokias equity-based incentive plans. The shares were issued without consideration and in accordance with the plan rules. Additionally, we issued a total of 40 451 treasury shares to employees of
former Alcatel Lucent in order to fulfill Nokias obligations under the liquidity agreements entered into by Nokia and some beneficiaries of Alcatel Lucent employee equity compensation arrangements. The total number of treasury shares issued
represented 5.9% of the total number of shares and the total voting rights as of December 31, 2016. The issuances did not have a significant effect on the relative holdings of the other Nokia shareholders, or on their voting
power.
In 2016, we issued 1 033 265 new shares following the holders of stock options issued in 2011 and 2012 exercising their option rights.
On November 15, 2016, in line with the previously announced EUR 7 billion capital structure optimization program,
the Board resolved to commence a share repurchase program under the authorization granted by the Nokia Annual General Meeting on June 16, 2016. The Board resolved to repurchase a maximum of 575 million Nokia shares up to an equivalent of
EUR 1 billion. The program and the authorization granted by the Nokia Annual General Meeting on June 16, 2016 are valid until December 16, 2017. Refer to Liquidity and capital resourcesCapital structure
optimization program.
In 2016, we repurchased a total of 54 296 182 shares, representing 0.9% of the total number of shares and voting
rights. The price paid for the shares was based on the current market price of the Nokia share on the securities market at the time of the repurchase.
Information on the authorizations held by the Board in 2016 to issue shares and special rights entitling to shares, to transfer shares and repurchase own
shares, as well as information on related party transactions, the shareholders, stock options, shareholders equity per share, dividend yield, price per earnings ratio, share prices, market capitalization, share turnover and average number
of shares is available in the Corporate GovernanceCompensation, Financial Statements, General facts on NokiaShares and shareholders and General facts on NokiaRelated party
transactions sections.
Refer to Note 20, Shares of the Parent Company, of our consolidated financial statements included in this annual report on Form
20-F for further information regarding Nokia shares.
|
|
|
86 |
|
NOKIA ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 20-F 2016 |
Board of Directors
and management
Pursuant to the Articles of Association of Nokia Corporation, our Board is composed of
a minimum of seven and a maximum of 12 members. The Board is elected at least annually at the Annual General Meeting of the shareholders for a term ending at the end of the next Annual General Meeting, which convenes annually by
June 30.
The Board has responsibility for appointing and discharging the President and CEO, the Chief Financial Officer and other members
of the Group Leadership Team.
For information on remuneration, shares and stock options held by the members of the Board, the President and CEO and the other
members of the Group Leadership Team, refer to Corporate governanceCompensation. For more information regarding corporate governance at Nokia, refer to Corporate governanceCorporate governance statement or to our
website at http://www.nokia.com/en_int/investors/ corporate-governance.
Articles of
Association
Our Articles of Association
are available on our website www.nokia.com/en_int/investors/ corporate-governance. Amendment of the Articles of Association requires a resolution of the general meeting of shareholders, supported by two-thirds of the votes cast and two-thirds of the
shares represented at the meeting. For information on our Articles of Association, refer to General facts on NokiaMemorandum and Articles of Association.
Our Articles of Association include provisions for obligation to redeem. Amendment of the provisions of Article 13 of the Articles of Association, Obligation to
purchase shares, requires a resolution supported by three-quarters of the votes cast and three-quarters of the shares represented at the meeting.
|
|
|
NOKIA ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 20-F 2016 |
|
87 |
|
|
|
88 |
|
NOKIA ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 20-F 2016 |
|
|
|
NOKIA ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 20-F 2016 |
|
89 |
Corporate governance statement
This corporate governance statement is prepared in accordance with Chapter 7, Section 7 of the
Finnish Securities Markets Act (2012/746, as amended) and the Finnish Corporate Governance Code 2015 (the Finnish Corporate Governance Code).
Regulatory framework
Our corporate governance practices comply with Finnish laws and regulations as well as with our Articles of Association. We also comply with the Finnish
Corporate Governance Code, available at www.cgfinland.fi, with the following exception:
In 2016, we complied with the Finnish Corporate Governance Code, with the
exception that we were not in full compliance with recommendation 24, because our restricted share plans did not include performance criteria but were time-based only. The restricted shares vest in three equal tranches on the first, second and third
anniversary of the award subject to continued employment with Nokia. Restricted shares were to be granted on a highly limited basis and only in exceptional retention and recruitment circumstances, primarily in the United States, to ensure our
ability to retain and recruit talent vital to the future success of the company. The restricted share plan for 2017 is designed in a similar manner, to be used on a limited basis for exceptional purposes related to retention and
recruitment, primarily in the United States. The Board approves, upon recommendation from the Boards Personnel Committee, any long-term incentive compensation and all equity plans, programs or similar arrangements of
significance that the company establishes for its employees.
We comply with the corporate governance standards of Nasdaq Helsinki, which are applicable due to the
listing of our shares on the exchange. Furthermore, as a result of the listing of our American Depositary Shares on the New York Stock Exchange (the NYSE) and our registration under the U.S. Securities Exchange Act of 1934, we must
comply with the U.S. federal securities laws and regulations, including the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 as well as the rules of the NYSE, in particular the corporate governance standards under Section 303A of the
NYSE Listed Company Manual, which is available at http://nysemanual.nyse.com/lcm/. We comply with these standards to the extent such provisions are applicable to foreign private issuers.
To the extent any non-domestic rules would require a violation of the laws of Finland, we are obliged to comply with Finnish law. There are no significant differences
in the corporate governance practices applied by Nokia compared to those applied by United States companies under the NYSE corporate governance standards, with the exception that Nokia complies with Finnish law with respect to the approval of
equity
compensation plans. Under Finnish law, stock option plans require shareholder approval at the time of their launch. All
other plans that include the delivery of company stock in the form of newly issued shares or treasury shares require shareholder approval at the time of the delivery of the shares, unless shareholder approval has been granted through an
authorization to the Board, a maximum of five years earlier. The NYSE corporate governance standards require that the equity compensation plans be approved by a companys shareholders. Nokia aims to minimize the
necessity for, or consequences of, conflicts between the laws of Finland and applicable non-domestic corporate governance standards.
The Board has also
adopted corporate governance guidelines (Corporate Governance Guidelines) to reflect our commitment to good corporate governance. Our Corporate Governance Guidelines are available on our website at
http://www.nokia.com/en_int/investors/
corporate-governance.
Main
corporate governance bodies of Nokia
Pursuant to the provisions of the Finnish Limited Liability Companies Act (2006/624, as amended) (the
Finnish Companies Act) and Nokias Articles of Association, the control and management of Nokia are divided among the shareholders at a general meeting, the Board, the President and CEO and the Group Leadership Team, chaired by the
President and CEO.
General meeting of shareholders
The shareholders may exercise their decision-making power and their right to speak and ask questions at the general meeting of shareholders. Each Nokia share
entitles a shareholder to one vote at general meetings of Nokia. Pursuant to the Finnish Companies Act, an Annual General Meeting must convene annually by June 30. The Annual General Meeting decides, among other things, on the
election and remuneration of the Board, the adoption of the annual accounts, the distribution of profit shown on the balance sheet, and discharging the members of the Board and the President and CEO from liability, as well as on the election
and fees of the external auditor.
In addition to the Annual General Meeting, an Extraordinary General Meeting shall be convened when the Board considers such
meeting to be necessary, or when the provisions of the Finnish Companies Act mandate that such a meeting must be held.
|
|
|
90 |
|
NOKIA ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 20-F 2016 |
Board of Directors
The operations of Nokia are managed under the direction of the Board, within the framework set by the Finnish Companies Act and Nokias Articles of
Association as well as any complementary rules of procedure as defined by the Board, such as the Corporate Governance Guidelines and the charters of the Boards committees.
Election and composition of the Board of Directors
Pursuant to the Articles of Association of Nokia Corporation, we have a Board that is composed of a minimum of seven and a maximum of 12 members. The Board is
elected at least annually at each Annual General Meeting with a simple majority of the shareholders votes cast at the meeting. The term of a Board member shall begin at the closing of the general meeting at which he or she was
elected, or later as resolved by the general meeting, and expire at the closing of the following Annual General Meeting. The Annual General Meeting convenes by June 30 annually.
The Annual General Meeting held on June 16, 2016 elected the following nine members to the Board: Vivek Badrinath, Bruce Brown, Louis R. Hughes, Jean C.
Monty, Elizabeth Nelson, Olivier Piou, Risto Siilasmaa, Carla Smits-Nusteling and Kari Stadigh. Vivek Badrinath subsequently resigned on July 29, 2016 since when the Board has consisted of eight members.
Our Boards leadership structure consists of a Chair and Vice Chair elected annually by the Board, and
confirmed by the independent directors of the Board, from among the Board members upon the recommendation of the Corporate Governance and Nomination Committee. On June 16, 2016, the Board elected Risto Siilasmaa to continue to serve as the
Chair and Olivier Piou as the Vice Chair of the Board. The Chair of the Board has certain specific duties as stipulated by Finnish law and our Corporate Governance Guidelines. The Vice Chair of the Board assumes the duties of the Chair of the Board
in the event he or she is prevented from performing his or her duties.
We do not have a policy concerning the combination or separation of the roles of the Chair
of the Board and the President and CEO, but the leadership structure is dependent on our needs, shareholder value and other relevant factors applicable from time to time, while respecting the highest corporate governance standards. In 2016,
Rajeev Suri served as the President and CEO, while Risto Siilasmaa served as the Chair of the Board.
The current members of the Board are all non-executive. For
the term of the Board that began at the Annual General Meeting on June 16, 2016, all Board member candidates were determined to be independent under the Finnish corporate governance standards and the rules of the NYSE.
The Board has adopted principles concerning Board diversity describing (a) our commitment to promoting diverse Board
composition and (b) how diversity is embedded into our processes and practices when identifying and proposing new Board candidates as well as re-election of current Board members.
At Nokia, Board diversity consists of a number of individual elements, including gender, age, nationality, cultural and educational backgrounds, skills and
experience. At Nokia diversity is not a static concept, but rather a relevant mix of required elements for the Board as a whole that evolves with time based on, among other things, the relevant business objectives and future needs of
Nokia. Board diversity is treated as a means of improvement and development rather than an end in itself.
Nokia acknowledges and supports the resolution
adopted by the Finnish Government on February 17, 2015 on gender equality on the boards of directors of Finnish large and mid-cap listed companies. Accordingly, we aim to have representation of 40% of both genders in our Board by
January 1, 2020 by proposing a corresponding Board composition for shareholder approval in the Annual General Meeting of 2019, at the latest. At the Annual General Meeting on June 16, 2016, Carla Smits-Nusteling was elected to the
Board after which the gender balance of the Board was 78% male and 22% female. After Vivek Badrinaths resignation from the Board on July 29, 2016, the gender balance of the Board has been 75% male and 25% female. We report annually
our objectives relating to both genders being represented on our Board, the means to achieve them, and the progress we have made in achieving them.
|
|
|
NOKIA ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 20-F 2016 |
|
91 |
Corporate governance statement
continued
Members of the Board of Directors
Set forth below are the current members of the Board and their biographical details. Information about the share ownership of the Board members is
disclosed in the Remuneration Statement, refer to Compensation below.
Chair Risto Siilasmaa
b. 1966
Chair of the Nokia Board. Board member
since 2008. Chair since 2012. Chair of the Corporate Governance and Nomination Committee.
Master of Science (Eng.), Helsinki University of Technology, Finland.
President and CEO of F-Secure Corporation
19882006.
Chairman of the Board of Directors of F-Secure Corporation. Chairman of the Board of Directors of the Federation of Finnish Technology Industries. Member of the
Board of Directors of the Confederation of Finnish Industries (EK). Member of European Roundtable of Industrialists.
Chairman of the Board of Directors of
Elisa Corporation 20082012. Member of the Board of Directors of Alcatel Lucent SA 2016.
Vice Chair Olivier Piou
b. 1958
Vice Chair of the Nokia Board. Board member and Vice Chair since 2016. Member of the Personnel Committee and the Corporate Governance and Nomination Committee.
Degree in Engineering, École Centrale de Lyon, France.
Chief Executive
Officer of Gemalto N.V. 20062016. Chief Executive Officer of Axalto N.V. 20042006. With Schlumberger 19812004, including numerous management positions in the areas of technology, marketing and operations, in France and
the United States.
Member of the Board of Directors of Gemalto N.V. Member of the Board of Directors of ErYoch SARL. Member of the Board of Directors of
Alcatel Lucent SA 20082016.
Bruce Brown
b. 1958
Nokia Board member since 2012. Chair of the Personnel Committee. Member of the Corporate Governance and Nomination Committee.
MBA (Marketing and Finance), Xavier University, the United States. BS (Chemical Engineering), Polytechnic Institute of New York University, the United States.
Retired from The Procter & Gamble Company in 2014. Chief Technology Officer of the Procter & Gamble Company 20082014. Various executive and
managerial positions in Baby Care, Feminine Care, and Beauty Care units of The Procter & Gamble Company since 1980 in the United States, Germany and Japan.
Member of the Board of Directors of Agency for Science, Technology & Research (A*STAR) in Singapore. Member of the Board of Directors, the Audit Committee and
the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee of P. H. Glatfelter Company. Member of the Board of Directors, the Audit Committee and the Compensation Committee of Medpace, Inc.
Louis Hughes
b. 1949
Nokia Board member since 2016. Member of the Audit Committee.
Masters Degree
in Business Administration, Harvard University, Graduate School of Business, the United States. Bachelor of Mechanical Engineering, General Motors Institute, now Kettering University, the United States.
President & Chief Operating Officer of Lockheed Martin in 2000. Executive Vice President of General Motors Corporation 19922000. President of
General Motors International Operations 19921998. President of General Motors Europe 19921994.
Chairman of InZero Systems (formerly GBS Laboratories)
(the United States). Independent director and member of the Audit Committee of AkzoNobel. Independent director and chairman of the Audit, Finance and Compliance Committee of ABB. Executive advisor partner of Wind Point Partners.
Member of the Board of Directors of Alcatel Lucent SA 20082016.
Jean Monty
b. 1947
Nokia Board member since 2016. Member
of the Personnel Committee.
Bachelor of Arts, Collège Sainte-Marie de Montréal, Canada. Master of Arts in Economics, University of
Western Ontario, Canada. Master of Business Administration, University of Chicago, the United States.
Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer
of Bell Canada Enterprises until 2002. President and Chief Executive Officer of Nortel Networks Corporation beginning in 1993.
Member of the Boards of Directors of
Bombardier and Fiera Capital Inc.
Member of the Board of Directors of Alcatel Lucent SA 20082016.
Elizabeth Nelson
b. 1960
Nokia Board member since 2012. Chair of the Audit Committee.
MBA (Finance), the
Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania, the United States. BS (Foreign Service), Georgetown University, the United States.
Executive Vice President and Chief
Financial Officer, Macromedia, Inc. 19972005. Vice President, Corporate Development, Macromedia, Inc. 19961997. Various roles in Corporate Development and International Finance, Hewlett-Packard Company 19881996.
Chairman of the Board of Directors of DAI. Independent Lead Director and Chair of the Audit Committee of Zendesk Inc. Member of the Board of Directors and Chair of the
Audit Committee of Pandora Media.
Member of the Boards of Directors of Brightcove, Inc. 20102014, SuccessFactors, Inc. 20072012 and Ancestry.com, Inc.
20092012.
Carla Smits-Nusteling
b. 1966
Nokia Board member since 2016. Member
of the Audit Committee.
Masters Degree in Business Economics, Erasmus University Rotterdam, the Netherlands. Executive Master of Finance and Control,
Vrije University Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Member of the Board of Directors and Chief Financial Officer of KPN 20092012. Various financial positions
in KPN 20002009. Various financial and operational positions in TNT/PTT Post 19902000.
Member of the Supervisory Board since 2013 and Chair of the
Audit Committee of ASML. Member of the Board of Directors since 2013 and Chair of the Audit Committee of TELE2 AB. Member of the Management Board of the Unilever Trust Office since 2015. Lay Judge in the Enterprise Court of the Amsterdam Court of
Appeal since 2015.
|
|
|
92 |
|
NOKIA ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 20-F 2016 |
Kari Stadigh
b. 1955
Group CEO and President of Sampo plc. Nokia Board member since 2011. Member of the Personnel Committee and the Corporate Governance and Nomination Committee.
Master of Science (Eng.), Helsinki University of Technology, Finland. Bachelor of Business Administration, Hanken School of Economics, Helsinki, Finland.
Deputy CEO of Sampo plc 20012009. President of Sampo Life Insurance Company Limited 19992000. President of Nova Life Insurance Company Ltd
19961998. President and COO of Jaakko Pöyry Group
19911996.
Member of the Board of Directors and Chair of the Boards Risk Committee of Nordea Bank AB (publ). Chairman of the Board of Directors of If P&C Insurance
Holding Ltd (publ) and Mandatum Life Insurance Company Limited. Member of the Board of Directors of the Federation of Finnish Financial Services. Member of the Board of Directors of Waypoint Capital Group Holdings Ltd. Member of the Board of
Directors of Niilo Helanderin Säätiö.
The following individuals served on the Board until the close of the Annual General Meeting held on June 16,
2016, or later if indicated.
Simon Jiang
b. 1953
Board member 20152016. Served as a member of the Personnel Committee until June 16, 2016.
Jouko Karvinen
b.
1957
Board member 20112016. Served as a member of the Audit Committee and the Corporate Governance and Nomination Committee until June 16,
2016.
Vivek Badrinath
until July 29, 2016
b. 1969
Board member 20142016. Served as
a member of the Audit Committee until July 29, 2016.
|
|
|
Chair Risto
Siilasmaa |
|
Vice Chair Olivier
Piou |
|
|
|
Bruce
Brown |
|
Louis
Hughes |
|
|
|
Jean
Monty |
|
Elizabeth
Nelson |
|
|
|
Carla
Smits-Nusteling |
|
Kari
Stadigh |
|
|
|
|
|
|
NOKIA ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 20-F 2016 |
|
93 |
Corporate governance statement
continued
Operations of the Board of Directors
The Board represents and is accountable to the shareholders of Nokia. The Boards responsibilities are active, not passive, and include the responsibility to
evaluate the strategic direction of Nokia, its management policies and the effectiveness of the implementation of such by the management on a regular basis. It is the responsibility of the members of the Board to act in good faith and with due care,
so as to exercise their business judgment on an informed basis, in a manner which they reasonably and honestly believe to be in the best interests of Nokia and its shareholders. In discharging that obligation, the members of the Board must
inform themselves of all relevant information reasonably available to them. The Board and each Board committee also have the power to appoint independent legal, financial or other advisers as they deem necessary from time to time.
The Board is ultimately responsible for monitoring and reviewing Nokias financial reporting process, effectiveness of related control and audit functions and the
independence of Nokias external auditor, as well as for monitoring the statutory audit of the annual and consolidated financial statements. The Boards responsibilities also include overseeing the structure and composition
of our top management and monitoring legal compliance and the management of risks related to our operations. In doing so, the Board may set annual ranges and/or individual limits for capital expenditures, investments and divestitures and
financial commitments that may not be exceeded without separate Board approval.
In risk management policies and processes, the Boards role includes risk analysis and assessment in connection with
financial, strategy and business reviews, updates and decision-making proposals. Risk management policies and processes are integral parts of Board deliberations and risk-related updates are provided to the Board on a recurring basis. For a more
detailed description of our risk management policies and processes, refer to Risk management, internal control and internal audit functions at NokiaMain features of risk management systems below.
The Board has the responsibility for appointing and discharging the President and CEO and the other members of the Group Leadership Team. Since May 2014, Rajeev Suri
has served as the President and CEO. His rights and responsibilities include those allotted to the President under Finnish law and he also chairs the Group Leadership Team.
Subject to the requirements of Finnish law, the independent directors of the Board confirm the compensation and terms of employment of the President and CEO upon the
recommendation of the Personnel Committee of the Board. The compensation and employment conditions of the other members of the Group Leadership Team are approved by the Personnel Committee upon the recommendation of the President and CEO.
The Board has three committees: the Audit Committee, the Corporate Governance and Nomination Committee and the Personnel
Committee. These committees assist the Board in its duties pursuant to their respective committee charters. The independent directors of the Board elect the members and chairs of the Boards committees from among the Boards
independent directors based on the recommendation of the Corporate Governance and Nomination Committee and based on each committees member qualification standards. The Board may also establish ad hoc committees for detailed reviews or
consideration of particular topics to be proposed for the approval of the Board.
In line with our Corporate Governance Guidelines, the Board conducts annual
performance evaluations, which also include evaluations of the Board committees work as well as the Board and Committee Chairs and individual Board members. In 2016, the Board conducted an evaluation process consisting of self-evaluations and
peer evaluations, as well as interviews. The evaluation process included both numeric assessments and the possibility to provide more detailed written comments. The feedback from selected members of management was also requested as part of this
evaluation process. The results of the evaluation are discussed and analyzed by the entire Board and improvement actions are agreed based on such discussion.
|
|
|
94 |
|
NOKIA ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 20-F 2016 |
Meetings of the Board of Directors
The Board
held 27 meetings excluding committee meetings during 2016, of which approximately 30% were regularly scheduled meetings held in person, complemented by meetings via video or conference calls or by other means. Additionally, in 2016, the
non-executive directors held meetings regularly without management in connection with Board meetings. Also, the independent directors held one separate meeting in 2016.
Directors attendance at Board meetings, including committee meetings but excluding meetings among the non-executive directors or independent directors only, in
2016 is set forth in the table below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Board meetings % |
|
|
Audit Committee meetings
% |
|
|
Corporate Governance and Nomination
Committee meetings % |
|
|
Personnel Committee meetings
% |
|
Vivek Badrinath (until July 29, 2016) |
|
|
100 |
|
|
|
100 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bruce Brown |
|
|
100 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100 |
|
|
|
100 |
|
Elizabeth Doherty (until January 8, 2016) |
|
|
100 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Louis Hughes (from January 8, 2016) |
|
|
96 |
|
|
|
100 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Simon Jiang (until June 16, 2016) |
|
|
71 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
75 |
|
Jouko Karvinen (until June 16, 2016) |
|
|
85 |
|
|
|
80 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jean Monty (from January 8, 2016) |
|
|
96 |
|
|
|
100 |
(1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
100 |
(2) |
Elizabeth Nelson |
|
|
93 |
|
|
|
100 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Olivier Piou (from January 8, 2016) |
|
|
96 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
85 |
|
|
|
88 |
|
Risto Siilasmaa |
|
|
100 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100 |
|
|
|
|
|
Carla Smits-Nusteling (from June 16, 2016) |
|
|
100 |
|
|
|
100 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Kari Stadigh |
|
|
96 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
85 |
|
|
|
100 |
|
(1) Until June 16, 2016
(2) From June 16,
2016
Additionally, many of the directors attended, as non-voting observers, in meetings of a committee of which they were not
a member.
According to Board practices, the non-executive directors meet without management in connection with each regularly scheduled meeting. Such sessions are
chaired by the non-executive Chair of the Board. If the non-executive Chair of the Board is unable to chair these meetings, the non-executive Vice Chair of the Board chairs the meeting. Additionally, the independent directors meet separately at
least once annually.
All the directors who served on the Board for the term until the close of the Annual General Meeting in 2016, except Jouko Karvinen and Simon
Jiang, attended Nokias Annual General Meeting held on June 16, 2016. The Finnish Corporate Governance Code recommends that the Chair and members of the Board and the President shall be present at the general meeting of shareholders to
ensure the possibility for the shareholders to exercise their right to present questions to both the Board and management.
Committees of the Board of Directors
The Audit Committee consists of a minimum of three members of the Board
who meet all applicable independence, financial literacy and other requirements as stipulated by Finnish law, the rules of Nasdaq Helsinki and the NYSE. From June 16, 2016, the Audit Committee consisted of the following four members of the
Board: Elizabeth Nelson (Chair), Vivek Badrinath, Louis Hughes and Carla Smits-Nusteling. Since Vivek Badrinaths resignation from the Board on July 29, 2016, the Audit Committee has consisted of the following three members: Elizabeth
Nelson (Chair), Louis Hughes and Carla Smits-Nusteling.
The Audit Committee is established by the Board primarily for the purpose of oversight of the
accounting and financial reporting processes of Nokia and the audits of its financial statements. The Committee is responsible for assisting the Board in the oversight of:
∎ |
the quality and integrity of the companys financial statements and related disclosures; |
∎ |
the statutory audit of the companys financial statements; |
∎ |
the external auditors qualifications and independence; |
∎ |
the performance of the external auditor subject to the requirements of Finnish law; |
∎ |
the performance of the companys internal controls and risk management and assurance function; |
∎ |
the performance of the internal audit function; and |
∎ |
the companys compliance with legal and regulatory requirements, including the performance of its ethics and compliance program. The Committee also maintains procedures for the receipt, retention and treatment of
complaints received by the company regarding accounting, internal controls, or auditing matters and for the confidential, anonymous submission by our employees of concerns relating to accounting or auditing matters. Nokias disclosure
controls and procedures, which are reviewed by the Audit Committee and approved by the President and CEO and the Chief Financial Officer, as well as the internal controls over financial reporting, are designed to provide reasonable assurance
regarding the quality and integrity of the companys financial statements and related disclosures. |
For further information on internal
control over financial reporting, refer to Risk management, internal control and internal audit functions at NokiaDescription of internal control procedures in relation to the financial reporting process below.
|
|
|
NOKIA ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 20-F 2016 |
|
95 |
Corporate governance statement
continued
Under Finnish law, an external auditor is elected by shareholders by a simple majority vote at the Annual General Meeting
for one year at a time. The Audit Committee prepares the proposal to the shareholders, upon its evaluation of the qualifications and independence of the external auditor, of the nominee for election or re-election. Under Finnish law, the fees
of the external auditor are also approved by the shareholders by a simple majority vote at the Annual General Meeting. The Committee prepares the proposal to the shareholders in respect of the fees of the external auditor, and approves the external
auditors annual audit fees under the guidance given by the Annual General Meeting. For information about the fees paid to Nokias external auditor, PricewaterhouseCoopers Oy, during 2016, refer to the Auditor fees
and services below.
In discharging its oversight role, the Audit Committee has full access to all company books, records, facilities and personnel. The
Committee may appoint counsel, auditors or other advisers in its sole discretion, and must receive appropriate funding, as determined by the Audit Committee, from Nokia for the payment of compensation to such outside advisers.
The Board has determined that all members of the Audit Committee, including its Chair, Elizabeth Nelson, are audit committee financial experts as defined in
the requirements of Item 16A of the annual report on Form 20-F filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). Ms. Nelson and each of the other members of the Audit Committee are independent
directors as defined by Finnish law and Finnish Corporate Governance Code and in Section 303A.02 of the NYSE Listed Company Manual.
The Audit Committee meets a minimum four times a year based upon a schedule established at the first meeting
following the appointment of the Committee. The Committee meets separately with the representatives of Nokias management, heads of the internal audit, and ethics and compliance functions, and the external auditor in connection with each
regularly scheduled meeting. The head of the internal audit function has, at all times, direct access to the Audit Committee, without the involvement of management.
The Audit Committee held eight (8) meetings in 2016. The average attendance at the meetings was 97%. Additionally, any director who so wishes may attend meetings
of the Audit Committee as a non-voting observer.
The Corporate Governance and Nomination Committee consists of three to five members of the Board who meet all applicable independence requirements as stipulated by Finnish law, the rules of Nasdaq Helsinki and the NYSE. From June 16, 2016, the Corporate
Governance and Nomination Committee has consisted of the following four members of the Board: Risto Siilasmaa (Chair), Bruce Brown, Olivier Piou and Kari Stadigh.
The Corporate Governance and Nomination Committees purpose is to prepare the proposals for the general meetings in respect of the composition of the Board
and the director remuneration to be approved by the shareholders, and to monitor issues and practices related to corporate governance and to propose necessary actions in respect thereof.
The Committee fulfills its responsibilities by:
∎ |
actively identifying individuals qualified to be elected members of the Board as well as considering and evaluating the appropriate level and structure of director remuneration; |
∎ |
preparing the proposal to the shareholders on the director nominees for election at the general meetings as well as director remuneration; |
∎ |
monitoring significant developments in the law and practice of corporate governance and of the duties and responsibilities of directors of public companies; |
∎ |
assisting the Board and each Committee of the Board in its annual performance evaluations, including establishing criteria to be applied in connection with such evaluations; |
∎ |
developing and recommending to the Board and administering Nokias Corporate Governance Guidelines; and |
∎ |
reviewing Nokias disclosure in the corporate governance statement. |
|
|
|
96 |
|
NOKIA ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 20-F 2016 |
The Committee has the power to appoint recruitment firms or advisers to identify appropriate candidates. The Committee
may also appoint counsel or other advisers, as it deems appropriate from time to time. The Committee has the sole authority to appoint or terminate the services of such firms or advisers and to review and approve such firms or advisers
fees and other retention terms. It is the Committees practice to appoint a recruitment firm to identify new director candidates.
The Corporate Governance and
Nomination Committee held seven (7) meetings in 2016. The average attendance at the meetings was 93%. Additionally, any director who so wishes may attend meetings of the Corporate Governance and Nomination Committee as a non-voting
observer.
The Personnel Committee consists of a minimum of three
members of the Board who meet all applicable independence requirements as stipulated by Finnish law, the rules of Nasdaq Helsinki and the NYSE. From June 16, 2016, the Personnel Committee has consisted of the following four members of the
Board: Bruce Brown (Chair), Jean Monty, Olivier Piou and Kari Stadigh.
The primary purpose of the Personnel Committee is to oversee the personnel-related
policies and practices at Nokia, as described in the Committee charter. It assists the Board in discharging its responsibilities in relation to all compensation, including equity compensation, of the companys executives and
their terms of employment. The Committee has overall responsibility for evaluating, resolving and making recommendations to the Board regarding:
∎ |
compensation of the companys top executives and their terms of employment; |
∎ |
all equity-based plans; |
∎ |
incentive compensation plans, policies and programs of the company affecting executives; and |
∎ |
other significant incentive plans.
|
The Committee is responsible for overseeing compensation philosophy and principles and ensuring the above compensation
programs are performance-based, and designed to contribute to long-term shareholder value creation and alignment to shareholders interests, properly motivate management, and support overall corporate strategies.
The Personnel Committee held nine (9) meetings in 2016. The average attendance at the meetings was 93%. Additionally, any director who so wishes may
attend meetings of the Personnel Committee as a non-voting observer.
Further information
The Corporate Governance Guidelines concerning the directors responsibilities, the composition and election of the members of the Board, its committees and
certain other matters relating to corporate governance are available on our website at http://www.nokia.com/en_int/investors/
corporate-governance. We have a Code of Conduct that is applicable to all of our
employees, directors and management and, in addition, we have a Code of Ethics applicable to the President and CEO, Chief Financial Officer and Corporate Controller. These documents and the charters of the Audit Committee, the Corporate
Governance and Nomination Committee and the Personnel Committee are available on our website at http://www.nokia.com/en_int/ investors/corporate-governance.
Group Leadership Team and the President and CEO
We have a Group Leadership Team that is responsible for the operative management of Nokia. The Chair and
members of the Group Leadership Team are appointed by the Board. The Group Leadership Team is chaired by the President and CEO. The President and CEOs rights and responsibilities include those allotted to the President under Finnish law.
|
|
|
NOKIA ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 20-F 2016 |
|
97 |
Corporate governance statement
continued
Members of the Nokia Group Leadership Team
Set forth below are the current and appointed members of the Group Leadership Team and their biographical details. Information about the shares and share-based rights
of the members of the Group Leadership Team is disclosed in the Remuneration Statement; refer to Compensation below.
During 2016
and thereafter, the following new appointments were made to the Group Leadership Team:
∎ |
Federico Guillén was appointed the President of Fixed Networks and member of the Group Leadership Team as of January 8, 2016; |
∎ |
Basil Alwan was appointed the President of IP/Optical Networks and member of the Group Leadership Team as of January 8, 2016; |
∎ |
Bhaskar Gorti was appointed the President of Applications & Analytics and member of the Group Leadership Team as of January 8, 2016; |
∎ |
Hans-Jürgen Bill was appointed the Chief Human Resources Officer and member of the Group Leadership Team as of January 8, 2016; |
∎ |
Kathrin Buvac was appointed the Chief Strategy Officer and member of the Group Leadership Team as of January 8, 2016; |
∎ |
Ashish Chowdhary was appointed the Chief Customer Operations Officer and member of the Group Leadership Team as of January 8, 2016; |
∎ |
Barry French was appointed the Chief Marketing Officer and member of the Group Leadership Team as of January 8, 2016;
|
∎ |
Marc Rouanne was appointed the Chief Innovation & Operating Officer and member of the Group Leadership Team as of January 8, 2016 and President of Mobile Networks as of April, 1 2017; |
∎ |
Maria Varsellona was appointed the Chief Legal Officer and member of the Group Leadership Team as of January 8, 2016; |
∎ |
Kristian Pullola was appointed the Chief Financial Officer and member of the Group Leadership Team as of January 1, 2017; |
∎ |
Igor Leprince was appointed the President of Global Services and member of the Group Leadership Team as of April 1, 2017; |
∎ |
Monika Maurer was appointed Chief Operating Officer and member of the Group Leadership Team as of April 1, 2017; and |
∎ |
Marcus Weldon was appointed Chief Technology Officer and President of Nokia Bell Labs, and member of the Group Leadership Team as of April 1, 2017. |
Further, during 2016 and thereafter, the following members of the Group Leadership Team resigned:
∎ |
Ramzi Haidamus, formerly President of Nokia Technologies, stepped down from the Group Leadership Team as of August 31, 2016; |
∎ |
Timo Ihamuotila, formerly Chief Financial Officer, stepped down from the Group Leadership Team as of December 31, 2016; and |
∎ |
Samih Elhage, President of Mobile Networks, will step down from the Group Leadership Team as of March 31, 2017.
|
Rajeev Suri
b. 1967
President and Chief Executive Officer of Nokia Corporation. Chair of the Nokia Group Leadership Team since 2014. Joined Nokia in 1995.
Bachelor of Engineering (Electronics and Communications), Manipal Institute of Technology, Karnataka, India.
CEO, Nokia Solutions and Networks 20092014. Head of Services, Nokia Siemens Networks 20072009. Head of Asia Pacific, Nokia Siemens Networks April 2007.
Senior Vice President, Nokia Networks Asia Pacific 20052007. Vice President, Hutchison Customer Business Team, Nokia Networks 20042005. General Manager, Business Development, Nokia Networks Asia Pacific 2003. Sales DirectorBT, O2
and Hutchison Global Customers, Nokia Networks 2002. Director, Technology and Applications, BT Global Customer, Nokia Networks 20002001. Head of Global Competitive Intelligence, Nokia Networks 19992000. Head of Product Competence Center,
Nokia Networks South Asia 19971999. System Marketing Manager, Cellular Transmission, Nokia Networks India 19951997. Head of Group Procurement, imports and special projects, Churchgate Group, Nigeria 19931995. National Account
ManagerTransmission/ManagerStrategic Planning, ICL India (ICIM) 19901993. Production Engineer, Calcom Electronics 1989.
Member of the Board of
Directors of Alcatel Lucent SA 2016.
Rajeev Suri
|
|
|
98 |
|
NOKIA ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 20-F 2016 |
Basil Alwan
Hans-Jürgen Bill
Kathrin Buvac
Ashish Chowdhary
Basil Alwan
b. 1962
President of IP/Optical Networks. Group Leadership Team member since 2016. Joined Nokia in 2016.
Bachelor in Computer Engineering, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, the United States.
Previously President of IP Routing and Transport, Alcatel Lucent 20122016. President of IP Division, Alcatel Lucent 20032012. Founder, President and CEO,
TiMetra Networks 20002003. Vice President and General Manager, Bay Networks (acquired by Nortel) Enterprise Products Division (EPD) 19972000. Vice President of Product Management and Marketing, Rapid City Communications 19961997.
Hans-Jürgen Bill
b. 1960
Chief Human Resources Officer. Group
Leadership Team member since 2016. Joined Nokia Siemens Networks in 2007.
Diploma in Telecommunications from the University of Deutsche
Bundespost, Dieburg/Darmstadt, Germany. Diploma in Economics from the University of Applied Sciences, Pforzheim, Germany.
Executive Vice President, Human
Resources, Nokia Corporation 20142016. Head of Human Resources, NSN 20092014. Head of West South Europe region, NSN 20072009. Head of Asia Pacific for Mobile Networks, Siemens 20032007. Head of Operations for Mobile Networks,
Siemens 20012003. Head of Region Central-East and North Europe for Mobile Networks, Siemens 19982001. Head of Mobile Networks in Indonesia, Siemens 19941998. Various management positions, Siemens 19831994.
Kathrin Buvac
b. 1980
Chief Strategy Officer. Group Leadership Team member since 2016. Joined Nokia Siemens Networks in 2007.
Degree in Business Information Systems from University of Cooperative Education, Germany. Bachelor Degree in Business Administration from Open University, London, the
United Kingdom.
Vice President, Corporate Strategy, Nokia Networks 20142016. Chief of staff to the CEO, Nokia Solutions and Networks
20112013. Head of Strategic Projects, Business Solutions, Nokia Siemens Networks 20092011. General Manager, Integration Programme, Nokia Siemens Networks 20072009. General Manager, Corporate Audit, Siemens Holding S.p.A.
20062007. Head of Controlling International Businesses, Siemens Communications 20032006. Head of Performance Controlling USA, Siemens Communications 20022003. Business Process Manager Global IT Strategy, Siemens Communications
20012002. Business Analyst, EADS Aerospace and Defence
19992000.
Ashish Chowdhary
b. 1965
Chief Customer Operations Officer. Group Leadership Team member since 2016. Joined Nokia in 2003.
MBA, Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, the United States. MS Computer Science, Emory University, Atlanta, the United States. BA
Mathematics from University of Delhi, India.
Executive Vice President and Chief Business Officer at Nokia Networks 20152016. Head of Customer Operations
Asia, Middle East & Africa (AMEA), Nokia Networks 20112015. Head of Global Services, Nokia Siemens Networks 20092010. Head of Managed Services, Nokia Siemens Networks 20072009. Country Head India, Nokia Networks
20032007. Vice President for Enterprise Business, Hughes Communications Ltd 20002003 and 19941998. Software and Project Engineer, Hughes Network Systems 19891993. Teaching Assistant, Computer Science, Emory University
19871989.
|
|
|
NOKIA ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 20-F 2016 |
|
99 |
Corporate governance statement
continued
Samih Elhage
b. 1961
President of Mobile Networks until March 31, 2017. Group Leadership Team member since 2014. Joined Nokia Siemens Networks in 2012.
Bachelor of Electrical Engineering (telecommunications), University of Ottawa, Canada. Bachelor of Economics, University of Ottawa, Canada. Master of Electrical
Engineering (telecommunications), École Polytechnique de Montréal, Canada.
Chief Financial and Operating Officer, Nokia Networks 20132016.
Chief Operating Officer, NSN 20122013. Senior Advisor, leading private equity and global management consulting firms 20112012. President, Carrier Voice over IP and Applications Solutions (CVAS) division, Nortel 20082010.
Leadership positions in Operations, Business Transformation, Broadband Networks, Optical Networks, and Core Data Networks, Nortel 19982008. Multiple leadership and management roles related to network development at Bell Canada
19901998.
Vice Chairman of the Board of Directors of Alcatel-Lucent Shanghai Bell.
Member of the Board of Directors of Alcatel Lucent SA 2016.
Barry French
b. 1963
Chief Marketing Officer. Group Leadership Team member since 2016. Joined Nokia in 2006.
Masters Degree in International Affairs from Columbia Universitys School of International and Public Affairs, New York, the United States. Bachelor of Arts
degree in Political Science, Bates Colleges, Lewiston, Maine, the United States.
Chief Marketing Officer and Executive Vice President, Marketing and Corporate
Affairs, Nokia 20142016. Head of Marketing and Corporate Affairs, Nokia Siemens Networks 20102014. Head of Communications, Nokia Siemens Networks 20062010. Vice President, Corporate Communications,
United Airlines 20042006. Director, Corporate Communications, Dell 20002004. Additional roles included communications, government relations and management positions, Engineering Animation, Raytheon, KRC Research and the Sawyer/Miller
Group.
Bhaskar Gorti
b. 1966
President of Applications & Analytics. Group Leadership Team member since 2016. Joined Nokia in 2016.
Masters degree in Electrical Engineering from Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, the United States. Bachelors degree in
Technology and Electrical Engineering from National Institute of Technology, Warangal, India.
Previously President of IP Platforms, Alcatel Lucent
20152016. Senior Vice President and General Manager, Communications Global Business Unit, Oracle 20062015. Senior Vice President, Portal Software 20022006.
Federico Guillén
b. 1963
President of Fixed Networks. Group Leadership Team member since 2016. Joined Nokia in 2016.
Degree in Telecommunications Engineering, ETSIT at Universidad Politécnica de Madrid, Spain. Masters degree in Switching & Communication
Architectures, ETSIT at Universidad Politécnica de Madrid, Spain. Masters Degree in International Management, ESC Lyon and Alcatel, France.
President of Fixed Networks, Alcatel Lucent 20132016. President and CEO of Alcatel Lucent Spain & Global Account Manager Telefonica, Alcatel Lucent
20092013. Vice President Sales of Vertical Market Sales in Western Europe, Alcatel Lucent 2009. Head of Regional Support Centre within Alcatel Lucents Fixed Access Division for South Europe, MEA, India and CALA 20072009. CEO,
Alcatel Mexico & Global Account Manager, Telmex 20032007. Various R&D, Portfolio and Sales Management Positions, Telettra and then Alcatel in Spain, Belgium and U.S.
19892003.
Igor Leprince
b. 1971
President of the Global Services.
Group Leadership Team member as of April 1, 2017. Joined Nokia Siemens Networks in 2007.
Masters degree in Telecommunications and Network Engineering,
E.N.S.T. Paris, France. Bachelors and Masters degree in Computer Science and Systems and Networks, University Paris 7, Paris, France.
Executive Vice
President, Global Services, Nokia since 2014. Senior Vice President and Head of Middle East & Africa, Nokia Networks 20112014. Vice President, Head of Care, Global Services, Nokia Siemens Networks 20102011. Vice President, Head
of Network Planning & Optimization, Global Services, Nokia Siemens Networks 20072010. Senior Vice president, LCC International 2007. Managing Director EMEA, WFI
20052007.
Samih Elhage
Barry French
Bhaskar Gorti
Federico Guillén
Igor Leprince
|
|
|
100 |
|
NOKIA ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 20-F 2016 |
Monika Maurer
Kristian Pullola
Marc Rouanne
Maria Varsellona
Marcus Weldon
Monika Maurer
b. 1956
Senior Vice President, Chief Operating Officer. Group Leadership Team member as of April 1, 2017. Joined Nokia in 2016.
Diploma in Physics and Chemistry, the University of Stuttgart, Germany. Diploma in Pedagogy, State University for Pedagogic, Stuttgart, Germany.
Chief Operating Officer, Fixed Networks Business Group, Nokia 20162017. Chief Operating Officer, Fixed Networks Business Line, Alcatel Lucent 20122016. Vice
President Presales Europe, Middle East & Africa, Alcatel Lucent 20102012. President, Product Attached Services Division, Alcatel Lucent 20092010. Executive Vice President Supply Chain and Procurement, Alcatel Shanghai Bell
2006 2008.
Kristian Pullola
b. 1973
Chief Financial Officer. Group
Leadership Team member since 2017. Joined Nokia in 1999.
Master of Science (Economics), the Hanken School of Economics, Helsinki, Finland. Finance diploma, the
Stockholm School of Economics, Stockholm, Sweden.
Senior Vice President, Corporate Controller, Nokia 20112016. Vice President, Treasury &
Investor Relations, Nokia 20092011. Vice President, Corporate Treasurer, Nokia 20062008. Director, Treasury Finance & Control, Nokia 20032006. Various roles in Nokia Treasury 19992003. Associate, Citibank
International 19981999.
Member of the Board of Directors of Ilmarinen Mutual Pension Insurance Company.
Marc Rouanne
b. 1963
Chief Innovation & Operating Officer until March 31, 2017 and President of Mobile Networks as of April 1, 2017. Group Leadership Team member
since 2016. Joined Nokia Siemens Networks in 2008.
Ph.D. in Information Theory from University of Notre Dame, Indiana, the United States. Engineering degree
in Signal Processing from Supélec, France. Degree in Computer Science from Université dOrsay, France.
Executive Vice President, Mobile
Broadband, Nokia Networks 20112016. Head of Network Systems, Nokia Siemens Networks 20102011. Head of Radio Access, Nokia Siemens Networks 20082009. Executive Vice President of Alcatel, President of Convergence Business Group,
Alcatel Lucent 20062008. Chief Operating Officer, then President Wireless Business Group, then Executive Vice President, Alcatel 20032006. VP positions, then Chief Operating Officer, then President Wireless Business Division, Alcatel
19972003. R&D and Engineering Director positions, Matra and Nortel Matra Cellular 19881997.
Chairman of the Board of Directors of Alcatel
Lucent SA 2016.
Maria Varsellona
b. 1970
Chief Legal Officer. Group Leadership Team member since 2016. Joined Nokia Siemens Networks in 2013.
Law Degree from University of Palermo (Juris Doctor), Italy.
Executive Vice
President and Chief Legal Officer, Nokia 20142016. General Counsel, NSN 20132014. Tetra Pak Group General Counsel, Tetra Laval Group 20112013. Sidel Group General Counsel, Tetra Laval Group 20092011. Senior Counsel Commercial
Operations and Global Services, GE Oil & Gas 20062009. Senior Counsel Europe, Hertz Europe 20052006. Senior Counsel Global Services, GE Oil & Gas 20012005. Lawyer, Pini Birmingham & Partners
19982001. Lawyer, Greco Law Firm 19941998.
Member of the Board of Directors of Nordea Bank AB.
Member of the Board of Directors of Alcatel Lucent SA 2016.
Marcus Weldon
b. 1968
Senior Vice President, Corporate Chief
Technology Officer and President of Nokia Bell Labs. Group Leadership Team member as of April 1, 2017. Joined Nokia in 2016.
Ph.D (Physical Chemistry) degree,
Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts, United States. Bachelor of Science (Computer Science and Chemistry) joint degree, Kings College, London, United Kingdom.
Corporate Chief Technology Officer and President of Bell Labs, Alcatel Lucent (then Nokia) 20132016. Corporate Chief Technology Officer, Alcatel Lucent
20092013. Chief Technology Officer, Broadband Networks & Solutions, Alcatel Lucent 20062009. Member of Technical Staff, Bell Labs, Lucent Technologies 19972006.
|
|
|
NOKIA ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 20-F 2016 |
|
101 |
Corporate governance statement
continued
Risk management, internal control and internal audit functions at Nokia
Main features of risk management systems
We have a systematic and structured approach to risk management across business operations and processes. Key risks and opportunities are primarily identified against
business targets either in business operations or as an integral part of financial planning. Key risks and opportunities are analyzed, managed, monitored and identified as part of business performance management with the support of risk management
personnel. Our overall risk management concept is based on managing the key risks that would prevent us from meeting our objectives, rather than solely focusing on eliminating risks. The principles documented in the Nokia Enterprise Risk Management
Policy, which is approved by the Audit Committee of the Board, require risk management and its elements to be integrated into key processes. One of the main principles is that the business or function head is also the risk owner, although all
employees are responsible for identifying, analyzing and managing risks, as appropriate, given their roles and duties. Risk management covers strategic, operational, financial and hazard risks. Key risks and opportunities are reviewed by the Group
Leadership Team and the Board in order to create visibility of business risks as well as to enable prioritization of risk management activities. In addition to the principles defined in the Nokia Enterprise Risk Management Policy, specific risk
management implementation is reflected in other key policies.
The Boards Audit Committee is responsible for, among other matters, risk management relating to
the financial reporting process and assisting the Boards oversight of the risk management function. Overseeing risk is an integral part of Board deliberations. The Boards role in overseeing risk includes risk analysis and assessment in
connection with financial, strategy and business reviews, updates and decision-making proposals. Additionally, certain significant risks are selected as priority risks that are monitored by the Board regularly. We have an Enterprise Risk
Management (ERM) function within the Chief Financial Officer organization. ERM regularly reviews risk evaluations with the internal controls function, and the internal controls function utilized the ERM analysis in planning its priority
areas.
Description of internal control procedures in relation to the financial reporting process
The management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting for Nokia. Our internal control over financial
reporting is designed to provide reasonable assurance to the management and the Board regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation and fair presentation of published financial statements.
The management conducts a yearly assessment of Nokias internal controls over financial reporting in accordance with the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations
framework (the COSO framework, 2013) and the Control Objectives for Information and related technology of internal controls. The assessment is performed based on a top-down risk assessment of our financial statements covering significant
accounts, processes and locations, corporate-level controls and information systems general controls.
As part of its assessment the management has documented:
∎ |
the corporate-level controls, which create the tone from the top containing the Nokia values and Code of Conduct and which provide discipline and structure to decision-making processes and ways of working.
Selected items from our operational mode and governance principles are separately documented as corporate-level controls; |
∎ |
the significant processes, structured under so-called financial cycles. Financial cycles have been designed to: (i) give a complete end-to-end view of all financial processes; (ii) identify key control points;
(iii) identify involved organizations; (iv) ensure coverage for important accounts and financial statement assertions; and (v) enable internal control management within Nokia; |
∎ |
the control activities, which consist of policies and procedures to ensure the managements directives are carried out and the related documentation is stored according to our document retention practices and local
statutory requirements; and |
∎ |
the information systems general controls to ensure that sufficient IT general controls, including change management, system development and computer operations, as well as access and authorizations, are in place.
|
Further, the management has also:
∎ |
assessed the design of the controls in place aimed at mitigating the financial reporting risks; |
∎ |
tested operating effectiveness of all key controls; and |
∎ |
evaluated all noted deficiencies in internal controls over financial reporting in the interim and as of year end. |
In
2016, Nokia has followed the procedures as described above and has reported on the progress and assessments to the management and to the Audit Committee of the Board on a quarterly basis. However, our assessment of the operating effectiveness of
internal controls as of year end has excluded the business acquired through the Acquisition of Alcatel Lucent, on January 4, 2016 and continue to integrate into the company. This exclusion is in accordance with the SECs guidance that a
recently acquired business may be omitted from the scope of the assessment in the year of acquisition. Refer to General facts on NokiaControls and Procedures.
Description of the organization of the internal audit function
We also have an internal audit function that acts as an independent appraisal function by examining and evaluating the adequacy and effectiveness of our system of
internal control. Internal audit reports to the Audit Committee of the Board. The head of the internal audit function has direct access to the Audit Committee, without involvement of the management. Internal Audit staffing levels and annual
budget are approved by the Audit Committee. All authority of the internal audit function is derived from the Board. Internal audit aligns to the business regionally and by business and function.
Annually, an internal audit plan is developed with input from the management, including key business risks and external factors. This plan is approved by the Audit
Committee of the Board. Audits are completed across the business focused on country level, customer level, IT system implementation, IT security, operations activities or at a Group function level. The results of each audit are reported to
the management identifying issues, financial impact, if any, and the correcting actions to be completed. Quarterly, internal audit communicates the progress of the internal audit plan completion, including the results of the closed audits.
|
|
|
102 |
|
NOKIA ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 20-F 2016 |
Internal audit also works closely with our Ethics and Compliance office to review any financial concerns brought to light
from various channels and, where possible, works with Enterprise Risk Management to ensure priority risk areas are reviewed through audits.
In 2016, the internal
audit plan was completed and all results of these
reviews were reported to the management and to the Audit Committee of the Board.
Main procedures relating to
insider administration
Our insider administration is organized according to the applicable European Union and Finnish laws and regulations as well as the
Nokia Insider Policy which sets out Group-wide rules and practices. The policy is applicable to all Nokia insiders as well as to all our employees.
Our insider
administrations responsibilities include internal communications related to insider matters and arrangement of related trainings; organizing and maintaining our insider registers; and overseeing the compliance with the insider rules.
Auditor fees and services
PricewaterhouseCoopers Oy has served as our auditor for each of the fiscal years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2016. The auditor is elected annually
by our shareholders at the Annual General Meeting for the fiscal year in question. The Audit Committee of the Board prepares the proposal to the shareholders in respect of the appointment of the auditor based upon its evaluation of the
qualifications and independence of the auditor to be proposed for election or re-election on an annual basis.
The following table presents fees by type paid
to PricewaterhouseCoopers for the years ended December 31:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EURm |
|
2016 |
|
|
2015 |
|
Audit fees(1) |
|
|
31.3 |
|
|
|
13.5 |
|
Audit-related fees(2) |
|
|
1.8 |
|
|
|
3.1 |
|
Tax fees(3) |
|
|
3.4 |
|
|
|
1.2 |
|
All other
fees(4) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.6 |
|
Total |
|
|
36.5 |
|
|
|
18.4 |
|
(1) |
Audit fees consist of fees incurred for the annual audit of the Groups consolidated financial statements and the statutory financial statements of the Groups subsidiaries. |
(2) |
Audit-related fees consist of fees billed for assurance and related services that are reasonably related to the performance of the audit or review of the Groups financial statements or that are traditionally
performed by the independent auditor, and include consultations concerning financial accounting and reporting standards; advice on tax accounting matters; advice and assistance in connection with local statutory accounting requirements; due
diligence related to mergers and acquisitions; employee benefit plan audits and reviews; and audit procedures in connection with investigations in the pre-litigation phase and compliance programs. They also include fees billed for other
audit services, which are those services that only the independent auditor can reasonably can provide, and include the provision of comfort letters and consents in connection with statutory and regulatory filings and the review of documents
filed with the SEC and other capital markets or local financial reporting regulatory bodies. |
(3) |
Tax fees include fees billed for: (i) services related to tax compliance including preparation and/or review of tax returns, preparation, review and/or filing of various certificates and forms and consultation
regarding tax returns and assistance with revenue authority queries; customs duties reviews and advice; compliance reviews, advice and assistance on other indirect taxes; and transaction cost analysis; (ii) service related to tax audits;
(iii) services related to individual compliance (preparation of individual tax returns and registrations for employees (non-executives), assistance with applying visa, residency, work permits and tax status for expatriates); (iv) services
related to technical guidance on tax matters; (v) services related to transfer pricing advice and assistance with tax clearances; and (vi) tax consultation and planning (advice on stock-based remuneration, local employer tax laws, social
security laws, employment laws and compensation programs and tax implications on short-term international transfers). |
(4) |
Other fees include fees billed for company establishments; liquidations; forensic accounting, data security, other consulting services and reference materials and services.
|
Audit Committee pre-approval policies and procedures
The Audit Committee of the Board is responsible, among other matters, for oversight of the external auditor subject to the requirements of Finnish law. The Audit
Committee has adopted a policy regarding pre-approval of audit services performed by the external auditors of Nokia Group (including the principal auditor as well as any other auditor of a Nokia Group company) and permissible non-audit
services performed by the principal external auditor of the Nokia Group (the Pre-approval Policy).
Under the Pre-approval Policy, proposed
services either: (i) may be pre-approved by the Audit Committee in accordance with certain service categories described in appendices to the Pre-approval Policy (general pre-approval); or (ii) require the specific pre-approval
of the Audit Committee (specific pre-approval). The Audit Committee may delegate either type of pre-approval authority to one or more of its members. The appendices to the Pre-approval Policy set out the audit, audit-related, tax and
other services that have received the general pre-approval of the Audit Committee. All other audit, audit-related (including services related to internal controls and significant mergers and acquisitions projects), tax and other services are subject
to specific pre-approval by the Audit Committee. All service requests concerning generally pre-approved services will be submitted to an appointed Audit Committee delegate within management, who will determine whether the services are within
the services generally pre-approved. The Pre-approval Policy and its appendices are subject to annual review by the Audit Committee.
The Audit Committee
establishes budgeted fee levels annually for each of the four categories of audit and non-audit services that are pre-approved under the Pre-approval Policy, namely, audit, audit-related, tax and other services. Requests or applications to
provide services that require specific approval by the Audit Committee are submitted to the Audit Committee by both the external auditor and the appointed Audit Committee delegate within management. At each regular meeting of the Audit
Committee, the auditor provides a report in order for the Audit Committee to review the services that the auditor is providing, as well as the status and cost of those services.
|
|
|
NOKIA ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 20-F 2016 |
|
103 |
Compensation
This section sets out our remuneration policies, how they have been implemented within Nokia,
and includes our Remuneration Report where we provide disclosure of the compensation of our Board, the President and CEO and aggregated compensation information for the Group Leadership Team. We report information related to executive
compensation in accordance with Finnish regulatory requirements and with requirements set forth by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission.
Following
the Acquisition of Alcatel Lucent, we focused on the following management and personnel-related objectives:
∎ |
creation of the new Group Leadership Team; |
∎ |
alignment of compensation practices and legacy arrangements with Nokias needs; |
∎ |
business continuity during integration; and |
∎ |
culture integration as we combined the two companies, aiming to keep the best of both companies. |
Separately, we took the opportunity to further enhance our compensation disclosures with the intention of simplifying and further increasing transparency. To
achieve this and to make the information more useful for our stakeholders, we separated our report into three sections:
(1) remuneration governance;
(2) remuneration policies; and
(3) Remuneration Report.
In 2016, our Group Leadership Team grew larger following the Acquisition of Alcatel Lucent and we witnessed the impact of our remuneration policies aligning with the
performance of the company:
∎ |
annual bonuses were down at 40% compared to 2015, reflecting tough market conditions; and |
∎ |
the Chair of the Board of Directors and the President and CEO reinforced their commitment to Nokia and the share ownership policy by investing directly in Nokia shares. |
In 2016, the President and CEO received EUR 7.5 million, which was triggered by the vesting of the remaining 2012 Nokia Networks equity incentive plan awards,
representing reward for the transformation of the former Nokia Siemens Networks to what today forms the foundation of our business.
Remuneration governance
We manage our remuneration through clearly defined processes, with well-defined governance principles, ensuring that no individual is involved in the
decision-making process related to their own remuneration and that there is appropriate oversight of any compensation decision. Remuneration of the Board is annually presented to shareholders for approval at the Annual General Meeting and the
remuneration of the President and CEO is approved by the Board.
The General Meeting of shareholders
∎ |
Shareholders approve the composition of the Board and the director remuneration based on proposals of the Boards Corporate Governance and Nomination Committee, which actively considers and evaluates the
appropriate level and structure of director remuneration. The composition of the Board and director remuneration are resolved by a majority vote of the shareholders represented at the General Meeting and determined as of the date of the General
Meeting, until the close of the next Annual General Meeting. |
∎ |
Shareholders authorize the Board to resolve to issue shares, for example, to settle the companys equity-based incentive plans based on the proposal of the Board. |
The Board of Directors
∎ |
Approves, and the independent members of the Board confirm, the compensation of the President and CEO, upon recommendation of the Personnel Committee; |
∎ |
Approves, upon recommendation of the Personnel Committee, any long-term incentive compensation and all equity plans, programs or similar arrangements of significance that the company establishes for its employees;
and |
∎ |
Decides on the issuance of shares (under authorization by shareholders) to fulfill the companys obligations under equity plans in respect of vested awards to be settled. |
The Personnel Committee
The Personnel Committee assists the Board in
discharging its responsibilities relating to all compensation, including equity compensation, of the companys executives and the terms of employment of the executives.
∎ |
In respect of the President and CEO, the Committee is accountable to the Board for: |
|
|
|
reviewing and recommending to the Board the goals and objectives relevant to compensation; |
|
|
|
evaluating and presenting to the Board the assessment of performance in light of those goals and objectives; and |
|
|
|
proposing to the Board the total compensation based on this evaluation. |
|
|
|
104 |
|
NOKIA ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 20-F 2016 |
∎ |
In respect of the other members of the Group Leadership Team (other than the President and CEO) and the direct reports to the President and CEO in Vice President-level positions and above, the Committee:
|
|
|
|
reviews and approves the goals and objectives relevant to the compensation, upon recommendation of the President and CEO; |
|
|
|
reviews the results of the evaluation of the performance in relation to the approved goals and objectives. The Committee approves the incentive compensation based on such evaluation; |
|
|
|
approves and oversees the total compensation recommendations made by the President and CEO; and |
|
|
|
reviews and approves compensation proposals made by the President and CEO in the event of termination of employment of a member of the Group Leadership Team. |
∎ |
The Committee reviews periodically and makes recommendations to the Board regarding any equity programs, plans and other long-term incentive compensation arrangements, or similar arrangements of significance that the
company establishes for, or makes available to, its employees, the appropriateness of the allocation of benefits under the plans and the extent to which the plans are meeting their intended objectives. |
∎ |
The Committee reviews and resolves, at their discretion, any other significant compensation arrangements applicable to the wider executive population in the Nokia Group. |
∎ |
The Committee will report to the Board at least annually on its views as to whether the President and CEO is providing the necessary leadership for the company in the long and short term. |
∎ |
The Committee reviews and discusses with management on compensation philosophy, strategy, principles, and management compensation to be included in our Remuneration Report. |
∎ |
The Committee reviews annually the companys share ownership policy to determine the appropriateness of the policy against its stated objectives. |
∎ |
The Committee has the power, in its sole discretion, to retain compensation consultants having special competence to assist the Personnel Committee in evaluating director and executive compensation.
|
∎ |
The Committee reviews and approves changes to the companys peer group for the assessment of the competitiveness of our compensation from time to time. |
The committee consults regularly with the President and CEO and the Chief Human Resources Officer though they are not present when their own compensation is
reviewed or discussed.
Work of the Personnel Committee
The Personnel Committee convened five (5) times during 2016 with a general theme for each meeting.
The discussion and timing of certain remuneration-related elements was unique in 2016, given the specific needs following the Acquisition of Alcatel Lucent and any associated integration-related matters, as required:
January:
∎ |
Budget approval for 2016 Nokia equity program and performance review for 2014 performance share plan |
∎ |
Employee engagement and organizational health review |
March:
∎ |
Review of 2015 short-term incentive program achievement and performance |
∎ |
Target setting for 2016 short-term incentive program |
∎ |
Review of 2015 annual report |
May:
Setting the long-term incentive target
Review of:
September:
Compensation strategy and philosophy review
Update on:
∎ |
market and legal environment; and |
∎ |
adviser market practices. |
Talent summit outcomes
November:
Review of:
∎ |
framework for short-term incentive program for 2017; |
∎ |
framework for long-term incentive program for 2017; |
∎ |
annual report for 2016; and |
|
|
|
NOKIA ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 20-F 2016 |
|
105 |
Compensation continued
The President and CEO
The President and CEO has an active role in the compensation governance and performance management processes for the Group Leadership Team and the wider employee
population at Nokia.
The President and CEO is not a member of the Personnel Committee and does not vote at Personnel Committee meetings, nor does he participate in
any conversations regarding his own compensation.
Advisers
The Personnel Committee retains the use of Aon, an independent external consultant appointed in 2015, to assist in the review and determination of executive
compensation and program design and provide insight into market trends and regulatory developments. The Personnel Committee has reviewed and established that Aon is independent of Nokia and does not have any other business relationships
with Nokia.
Authorizations and resolutions of the Board concerning remuneration
Valid authorizations
The Annual General Meeting held on June 16, 2016
resolved to authorize the Board to resolve to issue a maximum of 1 150 million shares through one or more issuances of shares or special rights entitling to shares. The authorization may be used to develop the companys capital
structure, diversify the shareholder base, finance or carry out acquisitions or other arrangements, to settle the companys equity-based incentive plans or for other purposes resolved by the Board.
The authorization is effective until December 16, 2017 and the authorization terminated the earlier shareholder authorization for the Board to issue
shares and special rights entitling to shares resolved at the Annual General Meeting on May 5, 2015. The authorization did not terminate the authorization granted by the Extraordinary General Meeting held on December 2, 2015 to the
Board for issuance of shares in order to implement the Acquisition of Alcatel Lucent.
Board resolutions
On February 1, 2017, the Board approved the Nokia equity program for 2017 and the issuance, without consideration, of a maximum of 9.75 million Nokia shares
held by the company in 2017 to settle its commitments to Nokias equity plan participants. The Nokia equity program for 2017 is explained in more detail below.
Remuneration policy
This section of our statement describes our remuneration policy and the considerations taken into account when setting the policy.
Board of Directors
The objective of the Boards
Corporate Governance and Nomination Committee is to ensure that Nokia is able to compete for top-of-class Board competence when determining director remuneration in order to maximize shareholder value. Therefore, it is the practice of the Corporate
Governance and Nomination Committee to review and compare the total remuneration levels and their criteria paid in other global companies with net sales, geographical coverage and complexity of business comparable to that of
Nokias. The Corporate Governance and Nomination Committees aim is to ensure that the company has an efficient Board consisting of international professionals representing a diverse and relevant mix of skills and experience.
Nokia believes that a competitive Board remuneration contributes to the achievement of this target.
Director remuneration at Nokia consists of an annual
fee and a meeting fee. Director remuneration for the term that began at the Annual General Meeting held on June 16, 2016 and ends at the close of the Annual General Meeting in 2017 consists of the following fees:
|
|
|
|
|
Annual fee |
|
EUR |
|
Chair |
|
|
440 000 |
|
Vice Chair |
|
|
185 000 |
|
Member |
|
|
160 000 |
|
Chair of Audit Committee |
|
|
30 000 |
|
Member of Audit Committee |
|
|
15 000 |
|
Chair of Personnel Committee |
|
|
30 000 |
|
Meeting fee/meeting(1) |
|
EUR |
|
Meeting requiring intercontinental travel |
|
|
5 000 |
|
Meeting requiring continental travel |
|
|
2 000 |
|
(1) |
Paid for a maximum of seven meetings per term. Not paid to the Chair of the Board. |
Approximately 40% of the annual fee
is paid in Nokia shares purchased from the market or by using treasury shares. According to the companys policy, the directors shall retain until the end of their directorship such number of shares that corresponds to the number of shares they
have received as Board remuneration during their first three years of service on the Board (the net amount received after deducting those shares needed to offset any costs relating to the acquisition of the shares, including taxes). The
shares shall be purchased from the market on behalf of the directors, or, if treasury shares are used, transferred to the directors, as soon as practicable after the Annual General Meeting. The remainder of the annual fee is payable in cash, most of
which is typically used to cover taxes arising from the paid remuneration.
A meeting fee for Board and Committee meetings is paid to all other members of the Board
except the Chair of the Board based on travel required between the home location of the member of the Board and the location of a meeting. Only one meeting fee is payable for multiple Board and Committee meetings per eligible travel. The meeting fee
is paid for a maximum of seven meetings per term. The meeting fee is paid in cash.
|
|
|
106 |
|
NOKIA ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 20-F 2016 |
According to the companys policy, non-executive directors do not participate in any of Nokias equity programs
and do not receive performance shares, restricted shares or any other equity-based or other form of variable compensation for their duties as members of the Board.
Group Leadership Team
Our focus when considering
policies related to remuneration of the Group Leadership Team and other senior executives is to:
∎ |
attract, retain and motivate the right people to lead Nokia; |
∎ |
drive performance and appropriate behaviors; and |
∎ |
align the interests of the executives and results of our compensation programs with the interests and returns of our shareholders. |
Compensation philosophy, design and strategy
Our compensation programs are
designed to attract, incentivize and retain the talent necessary to deliver strong financial results to the ultimate benefit of our shareholders. Rewards are tied to the execution of our strategy by adopting an appropriate mix of fixed and variable
compensation to engage and motivate employees in the performance of the business and ensure alignment with shareholder interests.
A single compensation framework
is used across the Nokia Group with a varying mix of fixed and variable compensation for each level of responsibility. Higher levels of performance-based compensation and equity compensation are used to reward executives for
delivering long-term sustainable growth and creating value for our shareholders.
We aim to provide a globally competitive compensation offering, which is comparable to that of our peer group companies,
taking into account industry, geography, size and complexity. The peer group is reviewed annually and external advice is sought to confirm the appropriateness of the peer group and also the quantum and the relative mix of compensation packages. The
peer group for 2016 is presented in the Remuneration Report below.
In designing our variable compensation programs key consideration
is given to:
∎ |
incorporating specific performance measures that align directly with the execution of our strategy and driving long-term sustainable success; |
∎ |
delivering an appropriate amount of performance-related variable compensation for the achievement of strategic goals and financial targets in both the short and long term; |
∎ |
appropriately balancing rewards between company and individual performance; and |
∎ |
fostering an ownership culture that promotes sustainability and long-term value creation that aligns the interests of participants with those of our shareholders.
|
Compensation structure and target setting
In line with our overall compensation philosophy, our executives are rewarded using a mix of fixed and variable pay.
Targets for the short- and long-term incentive plans are set by the Board. The Board reviews business plans, external analysts expectations, previous years
performance and the overall macro-economic environment to arrive at suitable targets for the plans. The goal of target-setting is equally to set achievable targets while also ensuring those targets are sufficiently demanding to create shareholder
value.
The elements of the compensation structure for the President and CEO and the Group Leadership Team are further detailed below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Element |
|
Purpose |
|
Philosophy |
|
Operation |
Base salary |
|
To attract and retain the best executives with the requisite level of knowledge, skills and experience to lead our businesses and provide a degree of
financial certainty and stability to executives. |
|
Fixed cash component targeted at our peer group median. Base salary can vary from the market average due to individual performance, experience, time in
position and internal comparison. Base salaries are reviewed annually taking into account market conditions, our financial condition and individual performance. |
|
Changes in base pay are determined based on consideration of a variety of factors, including, for example, the
following: ∎ performance by the member of the Group Leadership Team;
∎ changes in the market;
∎
market positioning; ∎ changes in individual responsibilities; and
∎
average employee salary increases across Nokia and in the local market. |
Short-term incentives |
|
To incentivize and reward performance against delivery of the annual business plan. |
|
All members of the Group Leadership Team are eligible to receive a short-term incentive, based on a set of pre-determined targets linked to key metrics that
drive sustainable business performance and are designed to reward a mix of corporate, business group and individual performance goals. |
|
Achievement is assessed at the end of the year to determine payout.
Target short-term incentive awards, when taken together with base salary, are designed to
provide a target annual cash compensation comparable to that provided by our peer group. |
|
|
|
NOKIA ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 20-F 2016 |
|
107 |
Compensation continued
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Element |
|
Purpose |
|
Philosophy |
|
Operation |
Long-term incentives |
|
To reward for delivery of sustainable long-term performance, align the executives interests with those of shareholders and aid retention. |
|
Long-term incentive awards are intended to provide competitive incentive compensation compared to our peer
group when combined with base salary and target short-term incentive. Performance share awards
are made annually. They have a two-year performance period and a one-year restriction period. The ultimate value of an award depends on our share price and business performance against predetermined performance criteria.
Restricted shares are also used for exceptional purposes related to retention and recruitment.
The number of shares vesting is predetermined but the ultimate value will rise or fall in line with movements in our share price.
There are also certain legacy equity compensation programs in force as described in Legacy equity compensation programs below. |
|
The value of performance share awards is determined by performance against preset strategic targets of
∎ net sales; and ∎ earnings per share.
Targets are set in the context of the Nokia long-term plans which are validated against analyst forecasts ensuring that they are considered both demanding of recipients
and motivational to them. The target value of a long-term incentive award depends on the
recipients role in the company and is set in the context of award levels for comparable roles in the wider market. |
Benefits & perquisites |
|
To attract, retain and protect executives. |
|
Members of the Group Leadership Team are provided with the same benefits as are made available to employees
more broadly in the relevant country, with additional security provisions, as appropriate.
Members of the Group Leadership Team may also be provided with certain other benefits from time to time, which are not material in value.
Benefits are provided with the intention of maintaining the health and wellness
of our executives. |
|
Benefits are determined by country of employment and align with local practices and regulatory requirements. |
Relocation & mobility |
|
To support the international mobility of executives and ensure the right people are in the right location to meet business needs. |
|
Members of the Group Leadership Team may be offered support to cover additional costs related to relocation. Mobility policies support the relocation of an executive and
their dependents or the reasonable costs of commuting. Benefits are market-specific and are not compensation for performing the role but provided to defray costs or additional burdens of a relocation or residence outside the home
country. |
|
|
Retirement plans |
|
To allow executives to provide for their retirement with a level of certainty. |
|
Taking into account our global executive population, we provide retirement funding in line with local market and regulatory requirements, typically through defined contribution or locally
mandated pension plans. No supplemental pension arrangements are provided in Finland. |
|
|
Change of control arrangements |
|
To ensure the continuity of management in connection with a possible change of control event. |
|
Change of control arrangements are offered on a very limited basis only and are based on a double trigger structure, which means that both a specified change of control event and termination
of the individuals employment must take place for any change of control-based severance payment to materialize. Refer to Termination provisions of the President and CEO and Termination provisions of the
Group Leadership Team. |
|
|
|
|
|
108 |
|
NOKIA ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 20-F 2016 |
Payments to departing executives
In the event of a termination of employment, any payable compensation is determined in line with legal advice regarding local legislation, country policies, contractual
obligations and the rules of the applicable incentive and benefit plans. Refer to Termination provisions of the President and CEO and Termination provisions of the Group Leadership Team.
Recruitment
Our policy on recruitment is to offer a compensation package
which is sufficient to attract, retain and motivate individuals with the right skills for the required role. On occasion, we may offer compensation to buy out awards which the candidate held prior to joining Nokia, but which lapsed
upon the candidate leaving their previous employer. Due consideration is given to the potential value and timing of such awards, taking into account any conditions attached to the awards and the likely performance against such conditions.
Clawback
Our executives are subject to a clawback policy where any
restatement of financial results may result in the reclaiming of amounts previously paid which had been based on numbers which have since been materially restated. Any such reclaimed amount, and the period over which payments can
be reclaimed, will take into account the circumstances and duration of any misstatement.
Share ownership requirement
Nokia believes that it is desirable for its executives to own shares in the company to align their interests with those of shareholders and to ensure that their
decisions are in the long-term interest of the company. The President and CEO and members of the Group Leadership Team are given a period of five years from their appointment in a designated role to achieve the required level of share ownership as
follows:
|
|
|
Role |
|
Share ownership
requirement |
President and CEO |
|
3 x base salary |
Member of the Group Leadership Team |
|
2 x base salary |
President and CEO
Compensation mix
To align the interests of the President and CEO with those
of the companys shareholders, the compensation mix for the President and CEO is heavily geared toward performance-based pay with only 16.5% of core target compensation in 2016 consisting of fixed pay. Additionally, the President and CEO
receives incidental benefits and mobility support and pension contributions are made in line with his participation in the statutory Finnish pension system, as regulated by the Finnish Employees Pension Act (395/2006, as amended)
(the Finnish TyEL).
The total remuneration of the President and CEO is thus dependent on performance, as detailed opposite:
Variable pay of the President and CEO
The variable pay of the President and
CEO is determined based on performance against a mix of targets, either short- or long-term in nature, depending on the strategic impact for the business.
Based on the Boards assessment, the most appropriate metrics for driving sustainable business performance at Nokia are:
∎ |
non-IFRS operating profit; |
∎ |
non-IFRS earnings per share; and |
|
|
|
NOKIA ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 20-F 2016 |
|
109 |
Compensation continued
The variable compensation focuses on these measures as well as personal strategic objectives to support the
strategic development of Nokia, which is not necessarily measurable or easily measured in purely financial terms.
Short-term incentives of the President and CEO
The short-term incentives for the President and CEO are based on the achievement of key financial targets and other strategic objectives, as defined below.
Performance against these defined targets is then multiplied by a business results multiplier, which acts as a funding factor for the incentive plan for most employees, to determine the final payment.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of base salary |
|
|
Minimum
performance |
|
Target performance |
|
Maximum performance |
|
Measurement criteria |
0% |
|
125% |
|
281.25% |
|
80% of the incentive is based on performance against the Nokia scorecard: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
∎
non-IFRS revenue ( 1⁄3); |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
∎
non-IFRS operating profit ( 1⁄3); and |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
∎
operating cash flow ( 1⁄3). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The final 20% of the incentive is determined based on the achievement of personal strategic objectives set for President and CEO by the
Board. |
Long-term incentives of the President and CEO
Long-term incentive awards are determined by reference to the market and as a percentage of salary. The President and CEO participates in the same long-term incentive
arrangements as other Nokia executives and senior executives. Long-term incentive programs are described under Nokia Equity Program.
Pension arrangements of the President and CEO
The President and CEO participates in the statutory Finnish pension system, the Finnish TyEL, which provides for a retirement benefit based on years of service and
earnings according to prescribed rules and regulations. No supplemental pension arrangements are provided. Under the Finnish TyEL pension system, base pay, incentives and other taxable fringe benefits are included in the definition of earnings,
while gains realized from equity are not. The retirement age for the President and CEO is 65.
Termination provisions of the President and CEO
Termination provisions for the President and CEOs service agreement specify alternatives for termination and associated compensation in accordance
with the following table:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Termination by |
|
Reason |
|
Notice |
|
Compensation |
Nokia |
|
Cause |
|
None |
|
The President and CEO is entitled to no additional compensation and all unvested equity awards would be forfeited. |
Nokia |
|
Reasons other than cause |
|
Up to 18 months |
|
The President and CEO is entitled to a severance payment equaling up to 18 months of compensation (including annual base salary, benefits,
and target incentive) and unvested equity awards would be forfeited. |
President and CEO |
|
Any reason |
|
Six (6) months |
|
The President and CEO may terminate his service agreement at any time with six months prior notice. The President and CEO would continue to receive
either salary and benefits during the notice period or, at Nokias discretion, a lump sum of equivalent value. Additionally, the President and CEO would be entitled to any short- or long-term incentives that would normally vest during
the notice period. Any unvested equity awards would be forfeited. |
President and CEO |
|
Nokias material breach of the service agreement |
|
Up to 18 months |
|
In the event that the President and CEO terminates his service agreement based on a final arbitration award demonstrating Nokias material breach of
the service agreement, he is entitled to a severance payment equaling to up to 18 months of compensation (including annual base salary, benefits and target incentive). Any unvested equity awards would be forfeited. |
|
|
|
110 |
|
NOKIA ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 20-F 2016 |
The President and CEOs service agreement includes special severance provisions in the event of a termination of
employment following a change of control event. Such change of control provisions are based on a double trigger structure, which means that both a change of control event and the termination of the President and CEOs employment
within a defined period of time must take place in order for any change of control-based severance payment to become payable. More specifically, if a change of control event has occurred, as defined in the service agreement, and the
President and CEOs service with Nokia is terminated either by Nokia or its successor without cause, or by the President and CEO for good reason, in either case within 18 months from such change of control event, the President
and CEO would be entitled to a severance payment equaling up to 18 months of compensation (including annual base salary, benefits, and target incentive) and cash payment (or payments) for the pro-rated value of his outstanding unvested equity
awards, restricted shares, performance shares and stock options (if any), payable pursuant to the terms of the service agreement. Good reason referred to above includes a material reduction of the President and CEOs
compensation and a material reduction of his duties and responsibilities, as defined in the service agreement and as determined by the Board.
The
President and CEO is subject to a 12-month non-competition obligation that applies after the termination of the service agreement or the date when he is released from his obligations and responsibilities, whichever occurs earlier.
The Group Leadership Team
Remuneration of the
Group Leadership Team
The remuneration of the members of the Group Leadership Team (excluding the President and CEO) consists of base salary, fringe benefits
and short- and long-term incentives. The members of the Group Leadership Team participate in the same reward programs, including short- and long-term incentive programs and under the same terms and conditions, as other eligible employees,
although the quantum and mix of their compensation vary by role and individual. Short-term incentive plans are based on rewarding the delivery of business performance and certain or all of the following metrics as appropriate in light of the
members role: non-IFRS revenue, non-IFRS operating profit, operating cash flow and defined strategic objectives. Long-term incentive programs are described under Nokia Equity Program.
Each member of the Group Leadership Team will have a mix of Nokia level and business group targets based on a mix of revenue, operating profit and operating cash
flow depending on their role. Personal strategic objectives of the members of the Group Leadership Team account for up to 20% of their short-term incentive awards.
Pension arrangements of the Group Leadership Team
The members of the Group
Leadership Team participate in the local retirement plans applicable to employees in the country of residence. Executives based in Finland participate in the statutory Finnish pension system, as regulated by the Finnish TyEL. Refer to
Pension arrangements of the President and CEO above.
Executives based outside Finland participate in arrangements relevant to their location.
Retirement plans vary by country and include defined benefit, defined contribution and cash balance plans. The retirement age for the members of Group Leadership Team varies between 60 and 65.
Termination provisions of the Group Leadership Team
In all cases, if an executive is dismissed for cause, no compensation will be payable and no outstanding equity will vest.
In the event of termination by the company for any other reason than cause, where the company pays compensation in lieu of notice period salary, the benefits and
target short-term incentive amounts are taken into account.
Additionally, the Board believes that maintaining a stable and effective leadership team is essential
for protecting and enhancing the best interests of Nokia and its shareholders. In order to encourage the continued focus, dedication and continuity of the members of the Group Leadership Team to their assigned duties without the distraction
that may arise from the possibility of termination of employment as a result of a specified change of control event in Nokia, certain provisions have been made available to them as appropriate when certain change of control events occur.
Certain members of the Group Leadership Team received change of control agreements related to the Acquisition of Alcatel Lucent that expired on January 8, 2017,
one year after the transaction completion. These change of control agreements have not been renewed.
Certain members of the Group Leadership Team received change
of control agreements at the time of the integration of Nokia and Nokia Siemens Networks which serve as an addendum to their executive agreements and provide for the pro-rata settlement of outstanding equity awards as follows. The change of control
agreements are based on a double trigger structure, which means that both a change of control event and the termination of the Group Leadership Team members employment must take place for any change of control-based severance payment
to materialize. More specifically, if a change of control event, as defined in the agreement, has occurred in the company, and the individuals employment with the company is terminated either by Nokia or its successor without cause, or by the
individual for good reason (e.g., material reduction of duties and responsibilities), in either case within 18 months from such change of control event, the individual will be entitled to his or her notice period compensation (including
base salary, benefits and target incentive) and cash payment (or payments) for the pro-rated value of the individuals outstanding unvested equity, including restricted shares and performance shares, payable pursuant to the terms of the
agreement. The Board has full discretion to terminate or amend the change of control agreements at any time.
No new change of control clauses have been included in
the service agreements of executives who joined the Group Leadership Team since January 1, 2016.
|
|
|
NOKIA ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 20-F 2016 |
|
111 |
Compensation continued
Nokia Equity Program
A key component of Group Leadership Team members and other executives compensation is equity-based long-term incentives with the purpose of aligning
the participants interests with those of shareholders. The amount of equity as a percentage of the compensation package increases with the seniority of the role. As in previous years, the Nokia equity program 2017 includes the following equity
instruments:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Performance shares |
|
Restricted shares |
|
Employee share purchase plan |
Eligible employees |
|
Grade based eligibility |
|
Grade-based eligibility |
|
Employees in participating countries |
Purpose |
|
Annual long-term incentive awards, to reward delivery of sustainable long-term performance, align with the interests of shareholders and
aid retention of key employees |
|
Exceptional recruitment and retention |
|
Encourage share ownership within the Nokia employee population, increasing engagement and sense of ownership in the company |
Vesting schedule |
|
Two-year performance period based on financial targets and one-year restriction period |
|
Vest equally in three tranches on the 1st, 2nd and 3rd anniversary of grant |
|
Matching shares vest at the end of the 12-month savings period |
Performance Shares
In accordance with the
previous years practice, the primary equity instruments granted to executive employees and other eligible employees are performance shares. The performance shares represent a commitment by Nokia to deliver Nokia shares to employees at a future
point in time, subject to our fulfillment of pre-defined performance criteria. Performance shares vest to participants after three years following a two-year performance period based on financial targets and a subsequent one-year
restriction period.
The Board has continued with the practice of the two-year performance period which gives greater predictability in a fast changing environment
and supports greater alignment of underlying achievement with payments. Targets are set in the context of the Boards view of the future business plans for Nokia, investor expectations and analyst forecasts and the Board will continue to review
the suitability of the two-year performance period for future years. The table below illustrates the performance criteria of the performance share plans for 2014 through to 2017.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Performance criteria (non-IFRS)(1) |
|
2017 |
|
|
2016 |
|
|
2015 |
|
|
2014 |
|
Annual net sales Nokia Group(2) |
|
|
Yes |
|
|
|
Yes |
|
|
|
Yes |
|
|
|
Yes |
|
Average annual earnings per share, Nokia Group (diluted) |
|
|
Yes |
|
|
|
Yes |
|
|
|
Yes |
|
|
|
Yes |
|
Minimum settlement at below threshold performance(3) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
25% |
|
|
|
25% |
|
|
|
25% |
|
(1) |
Non-IFRS measures exclude costs related to the Acquisition of Alcatel Lucent and related integration, goodwill impairment charges, intangible asset amortization and other purchase price fair value adjustments,
restructuring and associated charges and certain other items. |
(2) |
The performance criteria of the performance share plan 2015 were restated in May 2016 to reflect the new organizational structure and scope of the Nokia Group. The restatement adjusts the net sales and earnings per
share performance targets to remove the impact related to the Sale of the HERE Business for the fourth quarter of 2015 following the sale of HERE in 2015 and restates the 2016 targets based on the combined Group following the Acquisition of
Alcatel Lucent in January 2016. Net sales metric is weighted equally each year, instead of calculating average over the two-year performance period due to significant difference between the metrics for Nokia in 2015 and the combined Group in 2016.
For other years performance share plans, the criterion has been average annual net sales for Nokia Group during the performance period. |
(3) |
In 2014, a minimum payout level was introduced to reinforce the retentive impact of the plan by giving some certainty to remaining employees during the transformation of Nokia following the Sale of the D&S
Business and integration of the Nokia Networks business. The 2017 plan removes the minimum payout of 25% of the grant amount for executive employees. Employees who are not executives at the time the awards are granted to them will continue to
benefit from a minimum payout of 25% with the intention of this continuing to provide a retention effect. |
The 2017 performance share plan has a
two-year performance period (2017-2018) and a subsequent one-year restriction period. The shares will vest on January 1, 2020. The performance criteria for the 2017 performance share plan are:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Performance criteria (non-IFRS)(1) |
|
Weighting |
|
|
Threshold performance (EUR) |
|
|
Maximum performance (EUR) |
|
|
Potential range of
settlement(2) |
Nokia average annual net sales January 1, 2017December
31, 2018 |
|
|
50% |
|
|
|
22 842 million |
|
|
|
26 280 million |
|
|
Threshold number up to maximum
level (4 x Threshold number) |
Nokia average annual earnings per share (diluted) January 1,
2017December 31, 2018 |
|
|
50% |
|
|
|
0.26 |
|
|
|
0.38 |
|
|
Threshold number up to maximum
level (4 x Threshold number) |
(1) |
Non-IFRS measures exclude costs related to the Acquisition of Alcatel Lucent and related integration, goodwill impairment charges, intangible asset amortization and other purchase price fair value adjustments,
restructuring and associated charges and certain other items. |
(2) |
The minimum payout of 25% of the grant amount will be payable to all participants except executives only in the event that the calculated payout (based on Nokias performance against the performance criteria) is
beneath 25% achievement against the performance criteria. |
|
|
|
112 |
|
NOKIA ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 20-F 2016 |
Based on a resolution by the Board, the maximum number of performance shares that can be granted under the performance
share plan for 2017 is 37 million. The maximum payout can be 200%. Accordingly, achievement of the maximum performance against all the performance criteria would result in the vesting and an aggregate maximum payout of 74 million Nokia
shares. Achievements beyond the maximum performance level will not cause any further shares to vest. For employees who are not executives at the time the awards are granted to them, 25% of the performance shares granted in 2017 will settle after the
restriction period, regardless of the satisfaction of the applicable performance criteria. In case the applicable performance criteria are not satisfied, employees who are executives on the grant date for their 2017 performance shares will not
receive any settlement.
Until the Nokia shares are delivered, the participants will not have any shareholder rights, such as voting or dividend rights associated
with these performance shares.
Restricted Share Plan
Restricted shares
are used on a selective basis to ensure retention and recruitment of individuals deemed critical to our future success. The restricted shares vest in three equal tranches on the first, second and the third anniversary of the award subject to
continued employment with Nokia.
In 2017, restricted shares will be granted on a limited basis for exceptional purposes related to retention and recruitment,
primarily in the United States, to ensure we are able to retain and recruit vital talent for the future success of Nokia.
Until the Nokia shares are
delivered, the participants will not have any shareholder rights, such as voting or dividend rights, associated with the restricted shares.
Share in Success
Under our employee share purchase plan Share in Success, eligible employees can elect to make monthly contributions from their salary to purchase
Nokia shares. The contribution per employee cannot exceed EUR 1 800 per year. The share purchases are made at market value on predetermined dates on a monthly basis during a 12-month savings period. Nokia intends to deliver one matching share
for every two purchased shares the employee still holds at the end of the Plan cycle. Participation in the plan is voluntary for all employees in countries where the plan is offered.
Monitoring the performance of our equity plans
Each
year Nokia monitors the performance of its equity plans against the targets for the plan, total shareholder return and the impact that the plans have on total compensation compared to market peers. For further discussion on the performance of the
plans refer to Remuneration Report below.
Legacy equity programs
Stock Options
The granting of stock options ceased at the end of 2013;
however, awards granted under the 2011 stock option plan remain in force. Under the plan, each stock option entitles the holder to subscribe for one new Nokia share. The stock options are non-transferable and may be exercised for shares only. The
vesting schedule of the 2011 stock option plan is as follows:
|
|
|
Plan |
|
Vesting schedule |
2011 stock
option plan |
|
50% on third anniversary of grant
50% on fourth anniversary of grant
Term is approximately six years
The final subscription periods end on December 27, 2019 |
Shares will be eligible for dividends in respect of the financial year in which the share subscription takes place. Other shareholder
rights will commence on the date on which the subscribed shares are entered in the trade register. The stock option grants are generally forfeited if the employment relationship is terminated with Nokia.
2012 Nokia Networks Equity Incentive Plan
The 2012 Nokia Networks equity
incentive plan was established by the board of Nokia Siemens Networks prior to Nokias acquisition of full ownership of the Nokia Networks business. Under this plan options over Nokia Solutions and Networks B.V. shares were
granted to Mr. Suri and approximately 65 other Nokia Networks employees.
At that time, both Nokia and Siemens were considering a potential exit from
Nokia Siemens Networks. The plan had two objectives:
(1) to increase the value of Nokia Networks; and
(2) to create an exit option for its parent companies.
With the significantly
improved performance of Nokia Networks, the first objective has been met. The second objective has not occurred and, given the change in our strategy, the likelihood of a sale or an initial public offering (IPO) has diminished.
The exercise price of the options is based on a Nokia Networks share value on grant, as determined for the purposes of the 2012 Nokia Networks equity incentive plan.
The options will be cash-settled at exercise, unless an IPO has taken place, at which point they would be converted into equity-settled options.
The targets of the
plan were set at a demanding level and payments from the plan represent the outstanding achievement of the Networks team. The actual payments under the 2012 Nokia Networks equity incentive plan were determined based on the value of the Nokia
Networks business. In 2015, 30% of the options became exercisable and the remaining 70% became exercisable in 2016.
Alcatel Lucent liquidity agreements
In 2016, Nokia and Alcatel Lucent entered into liquidity agreements with beneficiaries of the 2015 Alcatel Lucent performance share plan. Pursuant to the agreements,
the 2015 Alcatel Lucent performance shares (as well as other unvested performance share plans, where the employee elected to enter into a liquidity agreement rather than accelerate their equity), would be exchanged for Nokia shares, or for the
cash equivalent of the market value of such Nokia shares, shortly after expiration of the vesting period. The exchange ratio would be aligned with the exchange ratio of Nokias exchange offer for all outstanding Alcatel Lucent securities,
subject to certain adjustments in the event of financial transactions by either Nokia or Alcatel Lucent. Accordingly, these agreements apply to any member of the Group Leadership Team who has entered into such liquidity agreement.
|
|
|
NOKIA ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 20-F 2016 |
|
113 |
Compensation continued
Remuneration Report
The Remuneration Report provides information on the remuneration earned between January 1, 2016 and December 31, 2016. We provide disclosure of the
compensation of our Board, the President and CEO and aggregated compensation information for the Group Leadership Team.
Board of
Directors
In 2016, the aggregate amount of compensation paid to the members of the Board for their services on the Board and its committees equaled EUR 2
050 902.
In accordance with the resolutions passed at the Extraordinary General Meeting on December 2, 2015, and following the successful public exchange
offer for all Alcatel Lucent securities, we confirmed the new composition of the Board on January 8, 2016. The newly elected members of the Board were Louis R. Hughes, Jean C. Monty and Olivier Piou. Elizabeth Doherty, who was a member of
the Board until the successful closing of the exchange offer for all Alcatel Lucent securities, stepped down from the Board.
Additionally, the Extraordinary
General Meeting resolved that the newly elected members of the Board would receive the same annual remuneration as was paid to the members of the Board elected at the Annual General Meeting on May 5, 2015, prorated for the new Board
members time in service from January 8, 2016 until the closing of the Annual General Meeting held on June 16, 2016.
The Annual General Meeting
held on June 16, 2016 resolved to elect nine members to the Board. The following members of the Board were re-elected for a term ending at the close of the Annual General Meeting in 2017: Vivek Badrinath, Bruce Brown, Louis R. Hughes,
Jean C. Monty, Elizabeth Nelson, Olivier Piou, Risto Siilasmaa and Kari Stadigh. Carla Smits-Nusteling was elected as new member of the Board for the same term. For director remuneration resolved by the Annual General Meeting for the current
term refer to Remuneration PolicyBoard of Directors above.
On July 29, 2016, Nokia announced that Vivek Badrinath had stepped down from the
Board.
The following table outlines the total annual compensation paid in 2016 to the members of the Board for their services, as resolved by shareholders at the
Extraordinary General Meeting on December 2, 2015 and the Annual General Meeting on June 16, 2016. The table does not include the meeting fees as resolved by the Annual General Meeting in June 2016. The meeting fees for applicable Board
and Committee meetings held in 2016 will be paid in 2017. For details of Nokia shares held by the members of the Board, refer to Share ownershipShare ownership of the Board of Directors below.
Compensation paid in 2016(1):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EUR |
|
Risto Siilasmaa, Chair |
|
|
440 000 |
|
Olivier Piou, Vice Chair(2) |
|
|
255 082 |
|
Vivek Badrinath(3) |
|
|
175 000 |
|
Bruce Brown(4) |
|
|
190 000 |
|
Elizabeth Doherty(5) |
|
|
|
|
Louis R. Hughes(6) |
|
|
240 410 |
|
Simon Jiang(7) |
|
|
|
|
Jouko Karvinen(8) |
|
|
|
|
Jean C. Monty(9) |
|
|
225 410 |
|
Elizabeth Nelson(10) |
|
|
190 000 |
|
Carla Smits-Nusteling(11) |
|
|
175 000 |
|
Kari
Stadigh(12) |
|
|
160 000 |
|
Total |
|
|
2 050 902 |
|
(1) |
Approximately 40% of each Board members annual fee was paid in Nokia shares purchased from the market and the remaining amount of approximately 60% was paid in cash. The meeting fees as resolved by the Annual
General Meeting in 2016 will be paid in cash in 2017 and are not included in the table. |
(2) |
Consists of EUR 70 082 for services as the Vice Chair of the Board from January 8, 2016 until the Annual General Meeting in 2016 and EUR 185 000 for services as the Vice Chair of the Board from the Annual General
Meeting in 2016. |
(3) |
Consists of EUR 160 000 for services as a member of the Board and EUR 15 000 for services as a member of the Audit Committee. However, Mr. Badrinath stepped down from the Board on July 29, 2016 and has
returned to the company the compensation paid to him. |
(4) |
Consists of EUR 160 000 for services as a member of the Board and EUR 30 000 for services as the Chair of the Personnel Committee. |
(5) |
Served as a member of the Audit Committee and a member of the Board until January 8, 2016. She was not paid any compensation during fiscal year 2016, but received compensation for the term until the close of
the Annual General Meeting in June 2016 in the fiscal year 2015. |
(6) |
Consists of EUR 60 738 for services as a member of the Board and EUR 4 672 for services as a member of the Audit Committee from January 8, 2016 until the Annual General Meeting in 2016 and of EUR 160 000 for
services as a member of the Board and EUR 15 000 for services as a member of the Audit Committee from the Annual General Meeting in 2016. |
(7) |
Served as a member of the Board until the Annual General Meeting in 2016. He was not paid any compensation during fiscal year 2016, but received compensation for the term until the close of the Annual General Meeting in
2016 in the fiscal year 2015. |
(8) |
Served as the Vice Chair of the Board until January 8, 2016, the Chair of the Audit Committee until April 1, 2016 and as a member of the Board until the Annual General Meeting in 2016. He was not paid any
compensation during fiscal year 2016, but received compensation for the term until the close of the Annual General Meeting in 2016 in the fiscal year 2015. |
(9) |
Consists of EUR 60 738 for services as a member of the Board and EUR 4 672 for services as a member of the Audit Committee from January 8, 2016 until the Annual General Meeting in June 2016 and of EUR 160 000
for services as a member of the Board from the Annual General Meeting in 2016. |
(10) |
Consists of EUR 160 000 for services as a member of the Board and EUR 30 000 for services as the Chair of the Audit Committee. |
(11) |
Consists of EUR 160 000 for services as a member of the Board and EUR 15 000 for services as a member of the Audit Committee. |
(12) |
Consists of EUR 160 000 for services as a member of the Board. |
|
|
|
114 |
|
NOKIA ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 20-F 2016 |
The President and CEO
The following table shows the
remuneration received by the President and CEO in 2016 and 2015. The long-term incentive payments reflect actual payments in the respective years attributable to the vesting of the 2012 Nokia Networks equity incentive plan.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EUR |
|
2016 |
|
|
2015 |
|
Salary |
|
|
1 049 044 |
|
|
|
1 000 000 |
|
Short-term incentive(1) |
|
|
780 357 |
|
|
|
1 922 125 |
|
Equity-based incentive(2) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
From role as Nokia President and CEO |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
From role as NSN CEO |
|
|
7 556 598 |
|
|
|
3 238 542 |
|
Other
compensation(3) |
|
|
122 157 |
|
|
|
145 658 |
|
Total |
|
|
9 508 156 |
|
|
|
6 306 325 |
|
(1) |
Short-term incentives represent amounts earned in respect of the financial year, but that are paid in April of the following year. |
(2) |
Amounts represent the value of the 2012 Nokia Networks equity incentive plan. Refer to 2012 Nokia Networks Equity Incentive Plan above. |
(3) |
Other compensation includes compensation for housing equaling EUR 41 312 (2015: EUR 47 950); travel assistance equaling EUR 33 482 (2015: EUR 48 510); Tax services equaling EUR 19 260 (2015: EUR 17 834) and other
benefits including mobile phone, driver and supplemental medical and disability insurance equaling EUR 28 103 (2015: EUR 31 363). |
Pursuant to Finnish
legislation, Nokia is required to make contributions to the Finnish TyEL pension arrangements in respect of the President and CEO. Such payments can be characterized as defined contribution payments. In 2016, payments to the Finnish state pension
system equaled EUR 469 737 (EUR 491 641 in 2015).
Short-term incentive
In line with Nokias performance in 2016, the short-term incentive of the President and CEO equaled EUR 780 357, or 63.5%, of the target award, reflecting the
challenging market environment.
Long-term incentive
In 2016, the
President and CEO was eligible to exercise the final options under the 2012 Nokia Networks equity incentive plan. The plan was established in 2012 to incentivize the turnaround of the former Nokia Siemens Networks business. The value of the options
to the President and CEO reflects the dramatic success of the turnaround plan and is borne out by the fact that, today, the core of Nokias business is networks-related.
In 2016, the President and CEO was awarded the following equity awards under the Nokia equity program:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Award |
|
Units awarded |
|
|
Grant date fair value
(EUR) |
|
|
Grant date |
|
|
Vesting date |
|
Performance shares(1) |
|
|
642 114 |
|
|
|
3 005 736 |
|
|
|
July 1, 2016 |
|
|
|
January 1, 2019 |
|
Restricted shares (with individual integration-related performance
conditions)(2) |
|
|
208 700 |
|
|
|
986 942 |
|
|
|
August 16, 2016 |
|
|
|
October 1, 2017, 2018 and
2019 |
|
(1) |
The 2016 performance share plan has a two-year performance period based on financial targets and a one-year restriction period. Minimum payout under the plan, even if threshold performance is not achieved, is 25% of the
awarded amount. The maximum payout would be 200% subject to maximum performance against all the performance criteria. Vesting is subject to continued employment. |
(2) |
In 2016, Nokia and certain senior executives of the company entered into agreements based on which the vesting of restricted shares granted to them is subject to fulfillment of predetermined performance conditions
related to the successful integration of Nokia and Alcatel Lucent. Performance is currently estimated at 100% payout and the restricted shares are expected to vest in three equal tranches on October 1, 2017, 2018 and 2019. Vesting is subject to
continued employment. |
The award of restricted shares represents a special long-term incentive to ensure that the President and CEO (and other senior
executives) is motivated to deliver the synergies of the Acquisition of Alcatel Lucent and share alongside shareholders in the benefits that they are expected to deliver.
Share ownership
Our share ownership policy requires that the President and
CEO holds a minimum of three times his base salary in Nokia shares in order to ensure alignment with shareholder interests over the long term. This requirement has been met. In 2016, the President and CEO acquired 519 757 Nokia shares. In
addition, the 2014 performance share plan vested on January 1, 2017 and consequently 742 297 Nokia shares were delivered to the President and CEO on February 8, 2017.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Units |
|
|
Value (EUR) |
|
Beneficially owned shares as of December 31,
2016(1) |
|
|
549 480 |
|
|
|
2 522 113 |
|
Vested shares under the 2014 performance share plan delivered on February 8, 2017(2) |
|
|
742 297 |
|
|
|
3 377 451 |
|
Unvested shares under other Nokia equity plans(3) |
|
|
1 351 961 |
|
|
|
6 205 500 |
|
Total |
|
|
2 643 738 |
|
|
|
12 105 064 |
|
(1) |
The value is based on the closing price of Nokia share of EUR 4.59 on Nasdaq Helsinki on December 30, 2016. |
(2) |
The value and number of units represent fair market value of a Nokia share of EUR 4.55 on Nasdaq Helsinki on February 8, 2017 and the net number of shares delivered after the applicable taxes was withheld from the
number of shares that vested to the President and CEO. |
(3) |
The number of units represents the number of unvested awards at December 31, 2016 including the payout factor of the 2015 performance share plan and excluding the 2014 performance share plan that vested on
January 1, 2017. The value is based on the closing price of a Nokia share of EUR 4.59 on Nasdaq Helsinki on December 30, 2016. Vesting is subject to continued employment. |
|
|
|
NOKIA ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 20-F 2016 |
|
115 |
Compensation continued
Group Leadership Team
Following the Acquisition of Alcatel Lucent, the Group Leadership Team has consisted of 13 persons split between Finland, other European countries and the United
States. The compensation structure for the Group Leadership Team was set in the Nokia framework honoring inherited agreements where appropriate.
|
|
|
|
|
Name |
|
Position in 2016 |
|
Appointment date |
Rajeev Suri |
|
President and CEO |
|
May 1, 2014 |
Samih Elhage |
|
President of Mobile Networks |
|
May 1, 2014 |
Federico Guillén |
|
President of Fixed Networks |
|
January 8, 2016 |
Basil Alwan |
|
President of IP/Optical Networks |
|
January 8, 2016 |
Bhaskar Gorti |
|
President of Applications & Analytics |
|
January 8, 2016 |
Ramzi Haidamus(1) |
|
President of Nokia Technologies |
|
September 3, 2014 |
Timo Ihamuotila(2) |
|
Chief Financial Officer |
|
September 1, 2011 |
Hans-Jürgen Bill |
|
Chief Human Resources Officer |
|
January 8, 2016 |
Kathrin Buvac |
|
Chief Strategy Officer |
|
January 8, 2016 |
Ashish Chowdhary |
|
Chief Customer Operations Officer |
|
January 8, 2016 |
Barry French |
|
Chief Marketing Officer |
|
January 8, 2016 |
Marc Rouanne |
|
Chief Innovation & Operating Officer |
|
January 8, 2016 |
Maria Varsellona |
|
Chief Legal Officer |
|
January 8, 2016 |
(1) |
Ramzi Haidamus was a member of the Group Leadership Team until September 30, 2016. |
(2) |
Timo Ihamuotila was a member of the Group Leadership Team until December 31, 2016. Kristian Pullola was appointed as Chief Financial Officer and a member of the Group Leadership Team as of January 1, 2017. The
Group Leadership Team currently consists of twelve (12) members, however, as announced on March 17, 2017, the Group Leadership Team will grow to fourteen (14) members from April 1, 2017. |
Remuneration of the Group Leadership Team (excluding the President and CEO) in 2015 and 2016, in the aggregate, was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2016
EURm(1) |
|
|
2015
EURm(1) |
|
Salary, short-term incentives and other
compensation(2) |
|
|
22.7 |
|
|
|
6.3 |
|
Equity-based
incentives(3) |
|
|
25.5 |
|
|
|
3.7 |
|
Total |
|
|
48.2 |
|
|
|
10.0 |
|
(1) |
In 2016, the Group Leadership Team consisted of up to twelve members (excluding the President and CEO), whereas in 2015 the Group Leadership Team consisted of up to four members (excluding the President and CEO).
|
(2) |
Short-term incentives represent amounts earned in respect of 2016 performance. Other compensation includes mobility related payments, local benefits and certain pension costs. |
(3) |
Amounts represent the value of the 2012 Nokia Networks equity incentive plan or other equity awards vesting or stock options exercised during 2016 and share awards from Alcatel Lucent where appropriate.
|
In 2016, the Group Leadership Team was awarded the following equity awards under the Nokia equity program:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Award |
|
Units
awarded |
|
|
Grant date fair
value (EUR) |
|
|
|
|
|
Grant date |
|
|
Vesting
date |
|
Performance shares(1) |
|
|
1 571 478 |
|
|
|
7 356 200 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
July 1, and August 16, 2016 |
|
|
|
January 1, 2019 |
|
Restricted shares (with individual integration-related performance
conditions)(2) |
|
|
1 015 100 |
|
|
|
4 800 408 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
August 16, 2016 |
|
|
|
October 1, 2017, 2018 and
2019 |
|
(1) |
The 2016 performance share plan has a two-year performance period based on financial targets and a one-year restriction period. Minimum payout under the plan, even if threshold performance is not achieved, is 25% of the
awarded amount. The maximum payout would be 200% subject to maximum performance against all the performance criteria. Vesting is subject to continued employment. |
(2) |
Nokia and certain senior executives of the company entered into agreements based on which the vesting of restricted shares granted to them is subject to fulfillment of predetermined performance conditions related to the
successful integration of Nokia and Alcatel Lucent. Performance is currently estimated at 100% payout and the restricted shares are expected to vest in three equal tranches on October 1, 2017, 2018 and 2019. Vesting is subject to continued
employment. |
|
|
|
116 |
|
NOKIA ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 20-F 2016 |
Review of our incentive plans
Short-term Incentives
Short-term incentive
targets and achievements for the members of the Group Leadership Team (excluding the President and CEO) were based on a mix of revenue, operating profit and cash flow targets. These targets are measured either at a Nokia Group level or,
alternatively, a mix of Nokia Group and business group level for business group presidents. Payout levels for 2016 represent the challenging business environment in which Nokia has been operating with median payout at 70% of target.
Long-term incentives
We have actively introduced
a rolling review of compensation against key metrics such as total shareholder return and share price to validate the effectiveness of our equity plans.
The 2014
performance share plan vested on January 1, 2017 with 125.72% of the target award vesting based on the achievement against the net sales and earnings per share targets during the performance period.
The 2015 performance share plan will vest on January 1, 2018 with 123.75% of the target award vesting based on the achievement against the net sales and earnings
per share targets during the performance period.
While short-term performance in 2016 was affected by a challenging market and the integration of Alcatel
Lucent, the performance under long-term incentive plans represents the significant turnaround of Nokia from 2013 when it acquired the remainder of Nokia Siemens Networks and the continued focus on delivering profit despite challenging market
conditions. The performance of the business in 2014, 2015 and 2016 against targets set in the context of analyst forecasts shows fair rewards for a business well positioned for the longer term.
|
|
|
NOKIA ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 20-F 2016 |
|
117 |
Compensation continued
Pay for performance
Core to
our compensation philosophy is a desire to pay for performance.
We compare ourselves to a group of peer companies. We rank our performance against the peer group
based on total shareholder return and total compensation paid, to ensure that the targets and amounts paid are for superior performance and reflect a balanced view. Data are only publicly available for our peer group for financial years to
December 31, 2015. Based on the comparison, the performance of Nokia over the preceding three years, as measured by total shareholder return, was ranked first, whilst the compensation paid out to the President and CEO
(as opposed to awarded) was ranked second. This shows a strong pay-for-performance alignment at Nokia, and this is illustrated in the chart opposite.
Our Peers
In looking for suitable comparators, we have considered ourselves
a European technology company and looked at businesses of similar size, global scale and complexity, such as:
|
|
|
ABB |
|
Infineon |
ASML |
|
Kone |
BT |
|
Phillips |
Deutsche Telekom |
|
Rolls-Royce |
Ericsson |
|
SAP |
Hexagon |
|
Vodafone |
Share ownership
Share ownership of the Board of Directors
As of December 31, 2016, the
members of our Board held a total of 4 754 602 shares and ADSs in Nokia, which represented approximately 0.08% of our outstanding shares and total voting rights excluding shares held by Nokia Group.
The following table sets forth the number of shares and ADSs held by the members of the Board at December 31, 2016:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name(1) |
|
|
Shares |
(1) |
|
|
ADSs |
(1) |
Risto Siilasmaa |
|
|
1 282 708 |
|
|
|
|
|
Olivier Piou |
|
|
252 760 |
|
|
|
|
|
Bruce Brown |
|
|
|
|
|
|
99 961 |
|
Louis R. Hughes |
|
|
41 827 |
|
|
|
|
|
Jean C. Monty |
|
|
2 767 557 |
|
|
|
|
|
Elizabeth Nelson |
|
|
|
|
|
|
45 868 |
|
Carla Smits-Nusteling |
|
|
13 921 |
|
|
|
|
|
Kari Stadigh |
|
|
250 000 |
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
The number of shares or ADSs includes shares and ADSs received as director compensation as well as shares and ADSs acquired through other means. Stock options or other equity awards that are deemed as being beneficially
owned under the applicable SEC rules are not included. For the number of shares or ADSs received as director compensation, refer to Note 35, Related party transactions, of our consolidated financial statements included in this annual report on
Form 20-F. |
|
|
|
118 |
|
NOKIA ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 20-F 2016 |
Share ownership of the President and CEO and the Nokia Group Leadership Team
The following table sets forth the share ownership of the President and CEO, and the other members of the Group Leadership Team in office as of December 31,
2016. The share ownership of all members of the Group Leadership Team, including the President and CEO, was 1 091 181 Nokia shares, which represented 0.02% of the outstanding shares and total voting rights excluding shares held
by Nokia Group at December 31, 2016. The share ownership requirement of the President and CEO as well as the members of the Group Leadership Team is described under share ownership requirement above.
|
|
|
|
|
Name |
|
Position in 2016 |
|
Beneficially owned shares
number |
Rajeev Suri |
|
President and Chief Executive Officer |
|
549 480 |
Samih Elhage |
|
President of Mobile Networks |
|
|
Federico Guillén |
|
President of Fixed Networks |
|
13 498 |
Basil Alwan |
|
President of IP/Optical Networks |
|
163 071 |
Bhaskar Gorti |
|
President of Applications & Analytics |
|
133 |
Timo Ihamuotila |
|
Chief Financial Officer |
|
353 120 |
Hans-Jürgen Bill |
|
Chief Human Resources Officer |
|
10 000 |
Kathrin Buvac |
|
Chief Strategy Officer |
|
|
Ashish Chowdhary |
|
Chief Customer Operations Officer |
|
1 746 |
Barry French |
|
Chief Marketing Officer |
|
133 |
Marc Rouanne |
|
Chief Innovation & Operating Officer |
|
|
Maria Varsellona |
|
Chief Legal Officer |
|
|
Unvested equity awards held by the Nokia Group Leadership Team as of December 31, 2016
The following table sets forth the potential ownership interest through the holding of equity-based incentives of the Group Leadership Team, including the President and
CEO:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares
receivable through stock options |
|
|
Shares receivable
through performance
shares at grant |
|
|
Shares receivable
through performance
shares at maximum(4) |
|
|
Shares
receivable through restricted
shares |
|
Number of equity awards held by the Group Leadership
Team(1) |
|
|
320 000 |
|
|
|
4 912 265 |
|
|
|
9 824 530 |
|
|
|
1 250 480 |
|
% of the outstanding shares(2) |
|
|
0.01% |
|
|
|
0.09% |
|
|
|
0.17% |
|
|
|
0.02% |
|
% of the total outstanding equity incentives (per instrument)(3) |
|
|
19.99% |
|
|
|
11.31% |
|
|
|
11.31% |
|
|
|
20.95% |
|
(1) |
Includes the 12 members of the Group Leadership Team in office as of December 31, 2016. The number of units held under awards made before June 30, 2016 was adjusted to reflect the impact of the special
dividend paid in 2016. |
(2) |
The percentages are calculated in relation to the outstanding number of shares and total voting rights of Nokia as of December 31, 2016, excluding shares held by Nokia Group. No member of the Group Leadership Team
owns more than 1% of the outstanding Nokia shares. |
(3) |
The percentages are calculated in relation to the total outstanding equity incentives per instrument. The number of units outstanding under awards made before June 30, 2016 reflects the impact of the special
dividend paid in 2016. |
(4) |
At maximum performance, under the performance share plans outstanding as of December 31, 2016, the payout would be 200% and the table reflects this potential maximum payout. The restriction period for the
performance share plan 2014 and the performance period for the performance share plan 2015 ended on December 31, 2016 and Nokias performance against the performance criteria set out in the plan rules, was above the threshold performance
level for both plans. The settlement to the participants under the performance share 2014 plan took place in February 2017 and the settlement for the performance share 2015 plan is expected to take place in the beginning of 2018 after the
restriction period ends. |
|
|
|
NOKIA ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 20-F 2016 |
|
119 |
|
|
|
120 |
|
NOKIA ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 20-F 2016 |
General facts on Nokia
Our history
Few companies have Nokias storied capacity for transforming, developing new technologies and adapting to shifts in market conditions. From its beginning in 1865
as a single paper mill operation, Nokia has found and nurtured success in several sectors over the years, including cable, paper products, rubber boots and tires, mobile devices and telecommunications infrastructure equipment.
Nokias sector-by-sector success over the years has mirrored its geographical rise: from a Finnish-focused company until the 1980s with a growing Nordic and
European presence; to a genuine European company in the early 1990s; and on to a truly global company from the mid-1990s onward. With the Acquisition of Alcatel Lucent, we further deepen and widen our global reach.
Nokia has been producing telecommunications equipment since the 1880salmost since telephony began.
A storied past
When Finnish engineer Fredrik Idestam set up his initial wood
pulp mill in Southern Finland in 1865, he took the first step in laying the foundation of Nokias capacity for innovating and finding opportunity. Sensing growing pulp product demand, Idestam opened a second mill a short time later on the
Nokianvirta River, inspiring him to name his company Nokia AB.
Idestams sense of endeavor would continue to prevail in the different phases Nokia would take.
In the 1960s, Nokia became a conglomerate, comprised of rubber, cable, forestry, electronics and power generation businesses, resulting from the merger of
Idestams Nokia AB, and Finnish Cable Works Ltd, a phone and power cable producer founded in 1912, and other businesses.
Transformation anew
It was not long before transformation would call again.
Deregulation of the
European telecommunications industries in the 1980s triggered new thinking and fresh business models.
In 1982, Nokia introduced both the first fully-digital local
telephone exchange in Europe and the worlds first car phone for the Nordic Mobile Telephone analog standard. The breakthrough of GSM (global system for mobile communications) in the 1980s introduced more efficient use of radio frequencies and
higher-quality sound. The first GSM call was made with a Nokia phone over the Nokia-built network of a Finnish operator called Radiolinja in 1991.
It was
around this time that Nokia made the strategic decision to make telecommunications and mobile phones our core business. Our other businesses, including aluminum, cable, chemicals, paper, rubber, power plant, and television businesses
were subsequently divested.
By 1998, Nokia was the world leader in mobile phones, a position it enjoyed for more than a decade.
And still, the business and technology worlds would continue to evolve, as would Nokia.
A shifting industry
In 2007,
Nokia combined its telecoms infrastructure operations with those of Siemens to create the NSN joint venture. We later bought Siemens stake in NSN in 2013 as the business was emerging from a successful strategy shift and the reality of
what Nokia calls a Programmable World of connected devices, sensors and people was starting to take shape.
In 2011, we joined with Microsoft to strengthen our
position in the highly competitive smartphone market, which in 2014 resulted in the closing of the Sale of the D&S Business. Nokia emerged from the transaction with a firm financial footing and three strong businessesNokia
Networks, HERE and Nokia Technologiesfocused on connecting the things and people of the Programmable World.
Nokias transformation was not complete. Our
former HERE digital mapping and location services business, an arena we entered in 2006, had been a key pillar of Nokias operational performance. However, following a strategic review of the business by the Board in light of plans to acquire
Alcatel Lucent, Nokia decided to sell its HERE Business.
Acquisition of Alcatel Lucent and beyond
The Acquisition of Alcatel Lucent positions Nokia as an innovation leader in next-generation technology and services.
Our reputation as an innovation powerhouse has been bolstered by the addition of Bell Labs, now known as Nokia Bell Labs. It joins a future-focused business backed
by tens of thousands of engineers and thousands of patent families, a reflection of Nokias innovation pedigree which has produced a huge array of benefits for consumers, business and society as a whole.
The acquisition helps us shape the connectivity and digitization revolution before usthe Programmable Worldin which billions of people, devices, and sensors
are connected in a way that opens up a world of possibilities. These can make our planet safer, cleaner, healthier, more sustainable, more efficient and more productive.
Nokias long history is marked by change and reinvention. We have always been excited by where technology will lead us as we seek to enable the human possibilities
of a connected world. We will continue to innovate, reimagining how technology works for us discreetly while blending into, and enriching, our daily lives.
|
|
|
122 |
|
NOKIA ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 20-F 2016 |
Memorandum and Articles of Association
Registration
Nokia is organized under the laws of the Republic
of Finland and registered under the business identity code 0112038-9. Under its current Articles of Association, Nokias corporate purpose is to research, develop, manufacture, market, sell and deliver products, software and
services in a wide range of consumer and business-to-business markets. These products, software and services relate to, among others, network infrastructure for telecommunication operators and other enterprises, the IoT, human health and well-being,
multimedia, big data and analytics, mobile devices and consumer wearables and other electronics. The company may also create, acquire and license intellectual property and software as well as engage in other industrial and commercial operations,
including securities trading and other investment activities. The company may carry on its business operations directly, through subsidiary companies, affiliate companies and joint ventures.
Directors voting powers
Under Finnish law, resolutions of the Board
shall be made by a majority vote. A director shall refrain from taking any part in the consideration of an agreement between the director and the company or third party, or any other issue that may provide any material benefit to him or her, which
may be contradictory to the interests of the company. Under Finnish law, there is no age limit requirement for directors, and there are no requirements under Finnish law that a director must own a minimum number of shares in order to qualify to
act as a director. However, in accordance with the current company policy, approximately 40% of the annual remuneration payable to the Board members is paid in Nokia shares purchased from the market, and the directors shall retain,
until the end of their directorship, such number of shares that corresponds to the number of shares they have received as Board remuneration during their first three years of service (the net amount received after deducting those shares used for
offsetting any costs relating to the acquisition of the shares, including taxes).
Share rights, preferences and restrictions
Each share confers the right to one vote at general meetings. According to Finnish law, a company generally must hold an Annual General Meeting called by the Board
within six months from the end of the fiscal year. Additionally, the Board is obliged to call an Extraordinary General Meeting, whenever such meeting is deemed necessary, or at the request of the auditor or shareholders representing a
minimum of one-tenth of all outstanding shares. Under our Articles of Association, the Board is elected at least annually at the Annual General Meeting of the shareholders for a term ending at the end of the next Annual General
Meeting.
Under Finnish law, shareholders may attend and vote at general meetings in person or by proxy. It is not customary in Finland for a company to issue
forms of proxy to its shareholders. Accordingly, Nokia does not do so. However, registered holders and beneficial owners of ADSs are issued forms of proxy by the Depositary.
To attend and vote at a general meeting, a shareholder must be registered in the register of shareholders in the Finnish
book-entry system on or prior to the record date set forth in the notice of the general meeting. A registered holder or a beneficial owner of the ADSs, like other beneficial owners whose shares are registered in the companys register
of shareholders in the name of a nominee, may vote with their shares provided that they arrange to have their name entered in the temporary register of shareholders for the general meeting.
The record date is the eighth business day preceding the meeting. To be entered in the temporary register of shareholders for the general meeting, a holder of ADSs
must provide the Depositary, or have his broker or other custodian provide the Depositary, on or before the voting deadline, as defined in the proxy material issued by the Depositary, a proxy with the following information: the name,
address, and social security number or another corresponding personal identification number of the holder of the ADSs, the number of shares to be voted by the holder of the ADSs and the voting instructions. The register of shareholders as of the
record date of each general meeting is public until the end of the respective meeting. Other nominee registered shareholders can attend and vote at the general meetings by instructing their broker or other custodian to register the shareholder
in Nokias temporary register of shareholders and give the voting instructions in accordance with the brokers or custodians instructions.
By
completing and returning the form of proxy provided by the Depositary, a holder of ADSs also authorizes the Depositary to give a notice to us, required by our Articles of Association, of the holders intention to attend the general
meeting.
Each of our shares confers equal rights to share in the distribution of the companys funds. For a description of dividend rights attaching to our
shares, refer to Shares and shareholders. Dividend entitlement lapses after three years if a dividend remains unclaimed for that period, in which case the unclaimed dividend will be retained by Nokia.
Under Finnish law, the rights of shareholders are related to the shares as set forth in law and our Articles of Association. Finnish law or our Articles of
Association do not set limitations on the rights to own Nokia securities, including the rights of foreign shareholders to hold or exercise voting rights in the said securities. Amendment of the Articles of Association requires a decision
of the general meeting, supported by two-thirds of the votes cast and two-thirds of the shares represented at the meeting.
|
|
|
NOKIA ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 20-F 2016 |
|
123 |
General facts on Nokia continued
Disclosure of shareholder ownership or voting power
According to the Finnish Securities Market Act, which entered into effect on January 1, 2013, a shareholder shall disclose their ownership or voting power to the
company and the Finnish Financial Supervisory Authority when the ownership or voting power reaches, exceeds or falls below 5, 10, 15, 20, 25, 30, 50 or 90% of all the shares or the voting rights outstanding. The term ownership includes
ownership by the shareholder, as well as selected related parties, and calculating the ownership or voting power covers agreements or other arrangements, which when concluded would cause the proportion of voting rights or number of shares to reach,
exceed or fall below the aforementioned limits. Upon receiving such notice, the company shall disclose it by a stock exchange release without undue delay.
Purchase obligation
Our Articles of Association require a shareholder that
holds one-third or one-half of all of our shares to purchase the shares of all other shareholders that so request, at a price generally based on the historical weighted average trading price of the shares. A shareholder who becomes subject to the
purchase obligation is also obligated to purchase any subscription rights, stock options or convertible bonds issued by the company if so requested by the holder. The purchase price of the shares under our Articles of Association is the higher of:
(a) the weighted average trading price of the shares on Nasdaq Helsinki during the ten business days prior to the day on which we have been notified by the purchaser that its holding has reached or exceeded the threshold referred to above
or, in the absence of such notification or its failure to arrive within the specified period, the day on which our Board otherwise becomes aware of this; or (b) the average price, weighted by the number of shares, which the purchaser has
paid for the shares it has acquired during the last 12 months preceding the date referred to in (a).
Under the Finnish Securities Market Act, a shareholder whose
voting power exceeds 30% or 50% of the total voting rights in a company shall, within one month, offer to purchase the remaining shares of the company, as well as any other rights entitling to the shares issued by the company, such as subscription
rights, convertible bonds or stock options issued by the company. The purchase price shall be the market price of the securities in question. The market price is determined on the basis of the highest price paid for the security during the
preceding six months by the shareholder or any party in close connection to the shareholder. This price can be deviated from for a specific reason. If the shareholder or any related party has not during the six months preceding the offer acquired
any securities that are the target for the offer, the market price is determined based on the average of the prices paid for the security in public trading during the preceding three months weighted by the volume of trade. This price can be
deviated from for a specific reason.
Under the Finnish Companies Act, a shareholder whose holding exceeds nine-tenths of the total number of shares or voting
rights in Nokia has both the right and, upon a request from the minority shareholders, the obligation to purchase all the shares of the minority shareholders for the current market price. The market price is determined, among other things, on
the basis of the recent market price of the shares. The purchase procedure under the Finnish Companies Act differs, and the purchase price may differ, from the purchase procedure and price under the Finnish Securities Market Act, as discussed above.
However, if the threshold of nine-tenths has been exceeded through either a mandatory or a voluntary public offer pursuant to the Finnish Securities Market Act, the market price under the Finnish Companies Act is deemed to be the price offered in
the public offer, unless there are specific reasons to deviate from it.
Pre-emptive rights
In connection with any offering of shares, the existing shareholders have a pre-emptive right to subscribe for shares offered in proportion to the amount of shares in
their possession. However, a general meeting of shareholders may vote, by a majority of two-thirds of the votes cast and two-thirds of the shares represented at the meeting, to waive this pre-emptive right provided that, from the companys
perspective, weighty financial grounds exist.
Under the Finnish Act on the Monitoring of Foreign Corporate Acquisitions (2012/172 as amended), a notification to
the Ministry of Employment and the Economy is required for a non-resident of Finland, directly or indirectly, when acquiring one-tenth or more of the voting power or corresponding factual influence in a company. The Ministry of
Employment and the Economy has to confirm the acquisition unless the acquisition would jeopardize important national interests, in which case the matter is referred to the Council of State. If the company in question is operating in the defense
sector, an approval by the Ministry of Employment and the Economy is required before the acquisition is made. These requirements are not applicable if, for instance, the voting power is acquired in a share issue that is proportional to the
holders ownership of the shares. Moreover, the requirements do not apply to residents of countries in the European Economic Area or EFTA countries.
|
|
|
124 |
|
NOKIA ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 20-F 2016 |
Selected financial data
Five-year consolidated financial information
The financial data set forth
below as of and for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015 and for each of the three years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014 has been derived from our audited consolidated financial statements included in this annual report on
Form 20-F. Financial data as of December 31, 2014, 2013, and 2012 and for each of the years in the two years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012 have been reclassified to reflect HERE as Discontinued operations.
The financial data as of December 31, 2016 and 2015 and for each of the three years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014 should be read in conjunction
with, and are qualified in their entirety by reference to, our audited consolidated financial statements.
We acquired Alcatel Lucent in January 2016; consequently
the acquisition is reflected in the financial data presented as of and for the year ended December 31, 2016 only. Refer to Note 5, Acquisitions, of our consolidated financial statements included in this annual report on Form 20-F. For
information on material trends affecting our business and results of operations, refer to Operating and financial review and prospectsPrincipal industry trends affecting operations above.
The audited consolidated financial statements from which the selected consolidated financial data set forth below have been derived were prepared in accordance with
IFRS. For information on our critical accounting policies refer to Note 3, Use of estimates and critical accounting judgments, of our consolidated financial statements included in this annual report on Form 20-F.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2016 |
|
|
|
|
|
2016 |
|
|
2015 |
|
|
2014 |
|
|
2013 |
|
|
2012 |
|
|
|
|
(USD) |
(1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(EUR) |
|
For the year ended December 31 |
|
(in millions, except per share data) |
|
From the consolidated income
statement(2) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales from Continuing operations |
|
|
26 044 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23 614 |
|
|
|
12 499 |
|
|
|
11 762 |
|
|
|
11 795 |
|
|
|
14 298 |
|
Operating (loss)/profit from Continuing operations |
|
|
(1 213 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1 100 |
) |
|
|
1 697 |
|
|
|
1 414 |
|
|
|
672 |
|
|
|
(520 |
) |
(Loss)/profit before tax from Continuing operations |
|
|
(1 510 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1 369 |
) |
|
|
1 540 |
|
|
|
999 |
|
|
|
399 |
|
|
|
(877 |
) |
(Loss)/profit for the year from Continuing operations |
|
|
(1 006 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(912 |
) |
|
|
1 194 |
|
|
|
2 718 |
|
|
|
128 |
|
|
|
(1 291 |
) |
(Loss)/profit from Discontinued operations |
|
|
(17 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(15 |
) |
|
|
1 274 |
|
|
|
758 |
|
|
|
(867 |
) |
|
|
(2 495 |
) |
(Loss)/profit for the year |
|
|
(1 022 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(927 |
) |
|
|
2 468 |
|
|
|
3 476 |
|
|
|
(739 |
) |
|
|
(3 786 |
) |
(Loss)/profit from Continuing operations attributable to equity holders of the parent |
|
|
(828 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(751 |
) |
|
|
1 192 |
|
|
|
2 710 |
|
|
|
273 |
|
|
|
(580 |
) |
(Loss)/profit attributable to equity holders of the parent |
|
|
(845 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(766 |
) |
|
|
2 466 |
|
|
|
3 462 |
|
|
|
(615 |
) |
|
|
(3 105 |
) |
Earnings per share (for profit/(loss) attributable to equity holders of the parent) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic earnings per share, EUR |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
From Continuing operations |
|
|
(0.14 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.13 |
) |
|
|
0.32 |
|
|
|
0.73 |
|
|
|
0.07 |
|
|
|
(0.16 |
) |
From the (loss)/profit for the year |
|
|
(0.14 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.13 |
) |
|
|
0.67 |
|
|
|
0.94 |
|
|
|
(0.17 |
) |
|
|
(0.84 |
) |
Diluted earnings per share, EUR |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
From Continuing operations |
|
|
(0.14 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.13 |
) |
|
|
0.31 |
|
|
|
0.67 |
|
|
|
0.07 |
|
|
|
(0.16 |
) |
From the (loss)/profit for the year |
|
|
(0.14 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.13 |
) |
|
|
0.63 |
|
|
|
0.85 |
|
|
|
(0.17 |
) |
|
|
(0.84 |
) |
Cash dividends per share, EUR(2) |
|
|
0.19 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.17 |
|
|
|
0.26 |
|
|
|
0.14 |
|
|
|
0.37 |
|
|
|
|
|
Average number of shares (millions of shares) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
|
5 732 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5 732 |
|
|
|
3 671 |
|
|
|
3 699 |
|
|
|
3 712 |
|
|
|
3 711 |
|
Diluted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Continuing operations |
|
|
5 741 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5 741 |
|
|
|
3 949 |
|
|
|
4 132 |
|
|
|
3 733 |
|
|
|
3 711 |
|
Group |
|
|
5 741 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5 741 |
|
|
|
3 949 |
|
|
|
4 132 |
|
|
|
3 712 |
|
|
|
3 711 |
|
(1) |
In 2016, average rate of USD per EUR 1.1029 has been used to translate the consolidated income statement items. |
(2) |
The Board proposes a cash dividend of EUR 0.17 per share for 2016, subject to shareholders approval at the Annual General Meeting convening on May 23, 2017. |
|
|
|
NOKIA ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 20-F 2016 |
|
125 |
General facts on Nokia continued
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2016 |
|
|
|
|
|
2016 |
|
|
2015 |
|
|
2014 |
|
|
2013 |
|
|
2012 |
|
|
|
|
(USD) |
(1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(EUR) |
|
For the year ended December 31 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in millions) |
|
From the consolidated statement of financial position |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-current assets |
|
|
25 517 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24 182 |
|
|
|
5 102 |
|
|
|
7 339 |
|
|
|
6 048 |
|
|
|
9 323 |
|
Cash and other liquid assets(2) |
|
|
9 841 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9 326 |
|
|
|
9 849 |
|
|
|
7 715 |
|
|
|
8 971 |
|
|
|
9 909 |
|
Other current assets |
|
|
11 975 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11 349 |
|
|
|
5 975 |
|
|
|
6 009 |
|
|
|
4 825 |
|
|
|
10 752 |
|
Assets held for sale and assets of disposal groups classified as held for sale |
|
|
46 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
44 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5 347 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
|
47 380 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
44 901 |
|
|
|
20 926 |
|
|
|
21 063 |
|
|
|
25 191 |
|
|
|
29 984 |
|
Capital and reserves attributable to equity holders of the parent |
|
|
21 203 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20 094 |
|
|
|
10 503 |
|
|
|
8 611 |
|
|
|
6 468 |
|
|
|
7 937 |
|
Non-controlling interests |
|
|
930 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
881 |
|
|
|
21 |
|
|
|
58 |
|
|
|
192 |
|
|
|
1 302 |
|
Long-term interest-bearing liabilities |
|
|
3 859 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 657 |
|
|
|
2 023 |
|
|
|
2 576 |
|
|
|
3 286 |
|
|
|
5 087 |
|
Other non-current liabilities |
|
|
8 087 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7 664 |
|
|
|
1 988 |
|
|
|
2 530 |
|
|
|
1 067 |
|
|
|
2 002 |
|
Current borrowings |
|
|
390 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
370 |
|
|
|
51 |
|
|
|
116 |
|
|
|
3 376 |
|
|
|
462 |
|
Other current liabilities |
|
|
12 910 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12 235 |
|
|
|
6 340 |
|
|
|
7 172 |
|
|
|
6 074 |
|
|
|
13 194 |
|
Liabilities of disposal groups classified as held for sale |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4 728 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total shareholders equity and liabilities |
|
|
47 380 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
44 901 |
|
|
|
20 926 |
|
|
|
21 063 |
|
|
|
25 191 |
|
|
|
29 984 |
|
Net cash(3) |
|
|
5 592 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5 299 |
|
|
|
7 775 |
|
|
|
5 023 |
|
|
|
2 309 |
|
|
|
4 360 |
|
Share capital |
|
|
260 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
246 |
|
|
|
246 |
|
|
|
246 |
|
|
|
246 |
|
|
|
246 |
|
(1) |
In 2016, end of period rate of USD per EUR 1.0552 has been used to translate the consolidated statement of financial position items. |
(2) |
Cash and other liquid assets consist of the following line items from our consolidated statement of financial position: cash and cash equivalents, available-for-sale investments, liquid assets and investments at fair
value through profit and loss, liquid assets. Net interest-bearing liabilities consist of borrowings due within one year and long-term interest-bearing liabilities, less cash and other liquid assets. |
(3) |
Total cash and other liquid assets less long-term interest-bearing liabilities (including the current portion thereof) less short-term borrowings. |
Exchange rate data
Our business and results of operations are, from time to
time, affected by changes in exchange rates, particularly between the euro, our reporting currency, and other currencies such as the U.S. dollar, the Chinese yuan, the Japanese yen and the Korean won. The following table sets forth information
concerning the noon buying rate for the years 2012 to 2016 and for each of the months in the six-month period ended February 28, 2017, expressed in U.S. dollars per euro. The average rate for a year means the average of the exchange rates on
the last day of each month during a year. The average rate for a month means the average of the daily exchange rates during that month.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
End
of period rate |
|
|
Average rate |
|
|
Highest rate |
|
|
Lowest rate |
|
For the year ended December 31 (unless otherwise specified) |
|
|
|
|
(USD per EUR) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2012 |
|
|
1.3186 |
|
|
|
1.2909 |
|
|
|
1.3463 |
|
|
|
1.2062 |
|
2013 |
|
|
1.3779 |
|
|
|
1.3303 |
|
|
|
1.3816 |
|
|
|
1.2774 |
|
2014 |
|
|
1.2101 |
|
|
|
1.3210 |
|
|
|
1.3927 |
|
|
|
1.2101 |
|
2015 |
|
|
1.0859 |
|
|
|
1.1032 |
|
|
|
1.2015 |
|
|
|
1.0524 |
|
2016 |
|
|
1.0552 |
|
|
|
1.1029 |
|
|
|
1.1516 |
|
|
|
1.0375 |
|
September 30, 2016 |
|
|
1.1238 |
|
|
|
1.1218 |
|
|
|
1.1271 |
|
|
|
1.1158 |
|
October 31, 2016 |
|
|
1.0962 |
|
|
|
1.1014 |
|
|
|
1.1212 |
|
|
|
1.0866 |
|
November 30, 2016 |
|
|
1.0578 |
|
|
|
1.0792 |
|
|
|
1.1121 |
|
|
|
1.0560 |
|
December 30, 2016 |
|
|
1.0552 |
|
|
|
1.0545 |
|
|
|
1.0758 |
|
|
|
1.0375 |
|
January 31, 2017 |
|
|
1.0794 |
|
|
|
1.0635 |
|
|
|
1.0794 |
|
|
|
1.0416 |
|
February 28, 2017 |
|
|
1.0618 |
|
|
|
1.0650 |
|
|
|
1.0802 |
|
|
|
1.0551 |
|
March 1, 2017 to March 10, 2017 |
|
|
1.0667 |
|
|
|
1.0575 |
|
|
|
1.0667 |
|
|
|
1.0514 |
|
On March 10, 2017, the noon buying rate was USD 1.0667 per EUR 1.00.
|
|
|
126 |
|
NOKIA ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 20-F 2016 |
Shares and shareholders
Shares and share capital
Nokia has one class of shares. Each Nokia share
entitles the holder to one vote at general meetings of Nokia.
As of December 31, 2016, the share capital of Nokia Corporation equaled EUR
245 896 461.96 and the total number of shares issued was 5 836 055 012. As of December 31, 2016, the total number of shares included 115 551 878 shares owned by Group companies representing approximately 2.0% of
the total number of shares and the total voting rights.
Nokia does not have minimum or maximum share capital or a par value of a share.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31 |
|
|
|
2016 |
|
|
2015 |
|
|
2014 |
|
|
2013 |
|
|
2012 |
|
Share capital, EURm |
|
|
|
|
246 |
|
|
|
246 |
|
|
|
246 |
|
|
|
246 |
|
|
|
246 |
|
Shares, (000s) |
|
|
|
|
5 836 055 |
|
|
|
3 992 864 |
|
|
|
3 745 044 |
|
|
|
3 744 994 |
|
|
|
3 744 956 |
|
Shares owned by the Group, (000s) |
|
|
|
|
115 552 |
|
|
|
53 669 |
|
|
|
96 901 |
|
|
|
32 568 |
|
|
|
33 971 |
|
Number of shares excluding shares owned by the Group, (000s) |
|
|
|
|
5 720 503 |
|
|
|
3 939 195 |
|
|
|
3 648 143 |
|
|
|
3 712 427 |
|
|
|
3 710 985 |
|
Average number of shares excluding shares owned by the Group during the year, (000s), basic |
|
|
|
|
5 732 371 |
|
|
|
3 670 934 |
|
|
|
3 698 723 |
|
|
|
3 712 079 |
|
|
|
3 710 845 |
|
Average number of shares excluding shares owned by the Group during the year, (000s), diluted |
|
|
|
|
5 741 117 |
|
|
|
3 949 312 |
|
|
|
4 131 602 |
|
|
|
3 712 079 |
|
|
|
3 710 845 |
|
Number of registered shareholders(1) |
|
|
|
|
237 700 |
|
|
|
209 509 |
|
|
|
216 830 |
|
|
|
225 587 |
|
|
|
250 799 |
|
(1) Each
account operator is included in the figure as only one registered shareholder. Key
ratios |
|
As of December 31, Continuing operations |
|
|
|
2016 |
|
|
2015 |
|
|
2014 |
|
|
2013 |
|
|
2012 |
|
Earnings per share for (loss)/profit attributable to equity holders of the parent |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings per share, basic, EUR |
|
|
|
|
(0.13 |
) |
|
|
0.32 |
|
|
|
0.73 |
|
|
|
0.07 |
|
|
|
(0.16 |
) |
Earnings per share, diluted, EUR |
|
|
|
|
(0.13 |
) |
|
|
0.31 |
|
|
|
0.67 |
|
|
|
0.07 |
|
|
|
(0.16 |
) |
P/E ratio,
basic(1) |
|
|
|
|
neg. |
|
|
|
20.6 |
|
|
|
8.99 |
|
|
|
83.14 |
|
|
|
neg. |
|
Dividend per share, EUR(2) |
|
|
|
|
0.17 |
|
|
|
0.26 |
|
|
|
0.14 |
|
|
|
0.37 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total dividends paid, EURm(2)(3) |
|
|
|
|
972 |
|
|
|
1 501 |
|
|
|
511 |
|
|
|
1 374 |
|
|
|
|
|
Payout ratio, basic(2) |
|
|
|
|
neg. |
|
|
|
0.81 |
|
|
|
0.19 |
|
|
|
5.29 |
|
|
|
neg. |
|
Dividend yield,
%(2) |
|
|
|
|
3.70 |
|
|
|
3.94 |
|
|
|
2.13 |
|
|
|
6.36 |
|
|
|
|
|
Shareholders equity per share, EUR(4) |
|
|
|
|
3.51 |
|
|
|
2.67 |
|
|
|
2.36 |
|
|
|
1.74 |
|
|
|
2.14 |
|
Market capitalization, EURm(4) |
|
|
|
|
26 257 |
|
|
|
25 999 |
|
|
|
23 932 |
|
|
|
21 606 |
|
|
|
10 873 |
|
(1) Based on Nokia closing
share price at year-end. (2) The Board proposes a cash dividend of EUR 0.17 per share for 2016, subject to
shareholders approval at the Annual General Meeting convening on May 23, 2017. (3) For 2016, the figure represents
the maximum amount to be distributed as dividends, based on the number of shares as of December 31, 2016, excluding the number of shares owned by the Group companies. Comparative figures represent the total actual amounts paid.
(4) Excludes shares owned by Group companies.
Reductions of share capital and number of shares |
|
Type of reduction |
|
|
|
Year |
|
|
Number of shares 000s |
|
|
Amount of reduction of the share
capital EURm |
|
|
Amount of reduction of the restricted
capital EURm |
|
|
Amount of reduction of the retained
earnings EURm |
|
Cancellation of shares |
|
|
|
|
2012 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cancellation of shares |
|
|
|
|
2013 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cancellation of shares |
|
|
|
|
2014 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cancellation of shares |
|
|
|
|
2015 |
|
|
|
66 904 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cancellation of shares |
|
|
|
|
2016 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NOKIA ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 20-F 2016 |
|
127 |
General facts on Nokia continued
Share turnover
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2016 |
|
|
2015 |
|
|
2014 |
|
|
2013 |
|
|
2012 |
Share turnover (000s)(1) |
|
|
9 604 722 |
|
|
|
8 490 823 |
|
|
|
9 278 853 |
|
|
|
16 748 295 |
|
|
19 995 211 |
Total number of shares (000s) |
|
|
5 836 055 |
|
|
|
3 992 823 |
|
|
|
3 745 044 |
|
|
|
3 744 956 |
|
|
3 744 956 |
% of total number of shares |
|
|
165 |
|
|
|
213 |
|
|
|
248 |
|
|
|
447 |
|
|
534 |
|
(1) Source: Nasdaq Helsinki, the NYSE composite tape and Euronext Paris (since
November 2015). |
|
The principal trading markets for the shares are Nasdaq Helsinki and Euronext Paris, in the form of shares, and the NYSE, in the form of ADSs. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nasdaq Helsinki share prices(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EUR |
|
2016 |
|
|
2015 |
|
|
2014 |
|
|
2013 |
|
|
2012 |
Low/high |
|
|
3.66/6.99 |
|
|
|
4.91/7.87 |
|
|
|
4.89/6.97 |
|
|
|
2.30/6.03 |
|
|
1.33/4.46 |
Average(2) |
|
|
5.07 |
|
|
|
6.53 |
|
|
|
5.99 |
|
|
|
3.57 |
|
|
2.62 |
Year-end |
|
|
4.59 |
|
|
|
6.60 |
|
|
|
6.56 |
|
|
|
5.82 |
|
|
2.93 |
(1) Source: Nasdaq
Helsinki. (2) Total turnover divided by total volume.
Euronext Paris share prices(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EUR |
|
2016 |
|
|
2015 |
|
|
2014 |
|
|
2013 |
|
|
2012 |
Low/high |
|
|
3.66/6.99 |
|
|
|
6.29/7.15 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average(2) |
|
|
4.98 |
|
|
|
6.66 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year-end |
|
|
4.57 |
|
|
|
6.59 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) Source: Euronext
Paris. (2) Total turnover divided by total volume.
NYSE share prices (ADS)(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
USD |
|
2016 |
|
|
2015 |
|
|
2014 |
|
|
2013 |
|
|
2012 |
Low/high |
|
|
4.04/7.55 |
|
|
|
5.71/8.37 |
|
|
|
6.64/8.73 |
|
|
|
3.02/8.18 |
|
|
1.63/5.87 |
Average(2) |
|
|
5.64 |
|
|
|
7.28 |
|
|
|
7.79 |
|
|
|
4.82 |
|
|
3.41 |
Year-end |
|
|
4.81 |
|
|
|
7.02 |
|
|
|
7.86 |
|
|
|
8.11 |
|
|
3.95 |
(1) |
Source: The NYSE composite tape. |
(2) |
Total turnover divided by total volume. |
Nokia share prices on Nasdaq Helsinki (EUR) and the NYSE (USD)
20122016
|
|
|
128 |
|
NOKIA ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 20-F 2016 |
Stock option exercises 20122016
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year |
|
Stock option category |
|
Subscription price
EUR |
|
|
Number of new
shares 000s |
|
|
Date
of payment |
|
|
Net proceeds
EURm |
|
|
New share capital
EURm |
|
2012 |
|
Nokia Stock Option Plan 2007 2Q |
|
|
18.39 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
2012 |
|
|
|
0.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nokia Stock Option Plan 2007 3Q |
|
|
21.86 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
2012 |
|
|
|
0.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nokia Stock Option Plan 2007 4Q |
|
|
27.53 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
2012 |
|
|
|
0.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nokia Stock Option Plan 2008 1Q |
|
|
24.15 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
2012 |
|
|
|
0.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nokia Stock Option Plan 2008 2Q |
|
|
19.16 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
2012 |
|
|
|
0.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nokia Stock Option Plan 2008 3Q |
|
|
17.80 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
2012 |
|
|
|
0.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nokia Stock Option Plan 2008 4Q |
|
|
12.43 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
2012 |
|
|
|
0.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nokia Stock Option Plan 2009 1Q |
|
|
9.82 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
2012 |
|
|
|
0.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nokia Stock Option Plan 2009 2Q |
|
|
11.18 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
2012 |
|
|
|
0.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nokia Stock Option Plan 2009 3Q |
|
|
9.28 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
2012 |
|
|
|
0.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nokia Stock Option Plan 2009 4Q |
|
|
8.76 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
2012 |
|
|
|
0.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nokia Stock Option Plan 2010 1Q |
|
|
10.11 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
2012 |
|
|
|
0.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nokia Stock Option Plan 2010 2Q |
|
|
8.86 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
2012 |
|
|
|
0.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nokia Stock Option Plan 2010 3Q |
|
|
7.29 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
2012 |
|
|
|
0.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nokia Stock Option Plan 2010 4Q |
|
|
7.59 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
2012 |
|
|
|
0.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
2013 |
|
Nokia Stock Option Plan 2008 1Q |
|
|
24.15 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
2013 |
|
|
|
0.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nokia Stock Option Plan 2008 2Q |
|
|
19.16 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
2013 |
|
|
|
0.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nokia Stock Option Plan 2008 3Q |
|
|
17.80 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
2013 |
|
|
|
0.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nokia Stock Option Plan 2008 4Q |
|
|
12.43 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
2013 |
|
|
|
0.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nokia Stock Option Plan 2009 1Q |
|
|
9.82 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
2013 |
|
|
|
0.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nokia Stock Option Plan 2009 2Q |
|
|
11.18 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
2013 |
|
|
|
0.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nokia Stock Option Plan 2009 3Q |
|
|
9.28 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
2013 |
|
|
|
0.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nokia Stock Option Plan 2009 4Q |
|
|
8.76 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
2013 |
|
|
|
0.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nokia Stock Option Plan 2010 1Q |
|
|
10.11 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
2013 |
|
|
|
0.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nokia Stock Option Plan 2010 2Q |
|
|
8.86 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
2013 |
|
|
|
0.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nokia Stock Option Plan 2010 3Q |
|
|
7.29 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
2013 |
|
|
|
0.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nokia Stock Option Plan 2010 4Q |
|
|
7.59 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
2013 |
|
|
|
0.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
2014 |
|
Nokia Stock Option Plan 2009 1Q |
|
|
9.56 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
2014 |
|
|
|
0.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nokia Stock Option Plan 2009 2Q |
|
|
10.92 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
2014 |
|
|
|
0.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nokia Stock Option Plan 2009 3Q |
|
|
9.02 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
2014 |
|
|
|
0.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nokia Stock Option Plan 2009 4Q |
|
|
8.50 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
2014 |
|
|
|
0.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nokia Stock Option Plan 2010 1Q |
|
|
9.85 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
2014 |
|
|
|
0.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nokia Stock Option Plan 2010 2Q |
|
|
8.60 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
2014 |
|
|
|
0.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nokia Stock Option Plan 2010 3Q |
|
|
7.03 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
2014 |
|
|
|
0.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nokia Stock Option Plan 2010 4Q |
|
|
7.33 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
2014 |
|
|
|
0.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nokia Stock Option Plan 2011 2Q |
|
|
5.76 |
|
|
|
50 |
|
|
|
2014 |
|
|
|
0.29 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nokia Stock Option Plan 2011 3Q |
|
|
3.50 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
2014 |
|
|
|
0.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
50 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.29 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NOKIA ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 20-F 2016 |
|
129 |
General facts on Nokia continued
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year |
|
Stock option category |
|
|
|
|
Subscription price
EUR |
|
|
Number of new
shares 000s |
|
|
Date
of payment |
|
|
Net proceeds
EURm |
|
|
New share capital
EURm |
|
2015 |
|
Nokia Stock Option Plan 2010 1Q |
|
|
|
|
|
|
9.85 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
2015 |
|
|
|
0.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nokia Stock Option Plan 2010 2Q |
|
|
|
|
|
|
8.60 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
2015 |
|
|
|
0.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nokia Stock Option Plan 2010 3Q |
|
|
|
|
|
|
7.03 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
2015 |
|
|
|
0.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nokia Stock Option Plan 2010 4Q |
|
|
|
|
|
|
7.33 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
2015 |
|
|
|
0.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nokia Stock Option Plan 2011 2Q |
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.76 |
|
|
|
442 |
|
|
|
2015 |
|
|
|
2.55 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nokia Stock Option Plan 2011 3Q |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.50 |
|
|
|
212 |
|
|
|
2015 |
|
|
|
0.74 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nokia Stock Option Plan 2011 4Q |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.58 |
|
|
|
90 |
|
|
|
2015 |
|
|
|
0.41 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nokia Stock Option Plan 2012 1Q |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.58 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
2015 |
|
|
|
0.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nokia Stock Option Plan 2012 2Q |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.18 |
|
|
|
213 |
|
|
|
2015 |
|
|
|
0.47 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nokia Stock Option Plan 2012 3Q |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.92 |
|
|
|
285 |
|
|
|
2015 |
|
|
|
0.55 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 242 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.72 |
|
|
|
|
|
2016 |
|
Nokia Stock Option Plan 2011 2Q |
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.66 |
|
|
|
104 |
|
|
|
2016 |
|
|
|
0.60 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nokia Stock Option Plan 2011 3Q |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.40 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
2016 |
|
|
|
0.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nokia Stock Option Plan 2011 4Q |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.48 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
2016 |
|
|
|
0.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nokia Stock Option Plan 2012 1Q |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.48 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
2016 |
|
|
|
0.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nokia Stock Option Plan 2012 2Q |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.08 |
|
|
|
240 |
|
|
|
2016 |
|
|
|
0.51 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nokia Stock Option Plan 2012 3Q |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.82 |
|
|
|
308 |
|
|
|
2016 |
|
|
|
0.57 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nokia Stock Option Plan 2012 4Q |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.76 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
2016 |
|
|
|
0.02 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nokia Stock Option Plan 2013 1Q |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.58 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
2016 |
|
|
|
0.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nokia Stock Option Plan 2013 2Q |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.35 |
|
|
|
166 |
|
|
|
2016 |
|
|
|
0.39 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nokia Stock Option Plan 2013 3Q |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.72 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
2016 |
|
|
|
0.01 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
833 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.10 |
|
|
|
|
|
Shareholders
As of December 31, 2016,
shareholders registered in Finland represented 17.46% and shareholders registered in the name of a nominee represented 82.54% of the total number of shares of Nokia Corporation. The number of directly registered shareholders was 237 700 as of
December 31, 2016. Each account operator (14) is included in this figure as only one registered shareholder.
Largest
shareholders registered in Finland as of December 31, 2016(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shareholder |
|
Total
number
of shares
000s |
|
|
% of all shares |
|
|
% of all
voting rights |
|
Varma Mutual Pension Insurance Company |
|
|
62 722 |
|
|
|
1.07 |
|
|
|
1.09 |
|
Schweizerische Nationalbank |
|
|
38 498 |
|
|
|
0.66 |
|
|
|
0.67 |
|
The State Pension Fund |
|
|
38 000 |
|
|
|
0.65 |
|
|
|
0.66 |
|
Ilmarinen Mutual Pension Insurance Company |
|
|
29 820 |
|
|
|
0.51 |
|
|
|
0.52 |
|
Elo Mutual Pension Insurance Company |
|
|
18 499 |
|
|
|
0.32 |
|
|
|
0.32 |
|
Folketrygdfondet |
|
|
18 389 |
|
|
|
0.32 |
|
|
|
0.32 |
|
Lival Oy Ab |
|
|
14 626 |
|
|
|
0.25 |
|
|
|
0.26 |
|
Svenska Litteratursällskapet i Finland rf |
|
|
14 394 |
|
|
|
0.25 |
|
|
|
0.25 |
|
Nordea Finland Fund |
|
|
13 263 |
|
|
|
0.23 |
|
|
|
0.23 |
|
Keva (Local Government Pensions Institution) |
|
|
10 849 |
|
|
|
0.19 |
|
|
|
0.19 |
|
(1) |
Excluding nominee registered shares and shares owned by Nokia Corporation. Nokia Corporation owned 104 093 217 shares as of December 31, 2016. |
|
|
|
130 |
|
NOKIA ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 20-F 2016 |
Breakdown of share ownership as of December 31, 2016(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
By number of shares owned |
|
Number
of
shareholders |
|
|
%
of
shareholders |
|
|
Total
number of shares |
|
|
%
of
all
shares |
1100 |
|
|
47 964 |
|
|
|
20.18 |
|
|
|
2 774 317 |
|
|
0.05 |
1011 000 |
|
|
115 933 |
|
|
|
48.77 |
|
|
|
53 091 780 |
|
|
0.91 |
1 00110 000 |
|
|
65 028 |
|
|
|
27.36 |
|
|
|
203 634 514 |
|
|
3.49 |
10 001100 000 |
|
|
8 267 |
|
|
|
3.48 |
|
|
|
200 858 393 |
|
|
3.44 |
100 001500 000 |
|
|
388 |
|
|
|
0.16 |
|
|
|
77 417 339 |
|
|
1.33 |
500 0011 000 000 |
|
|
43 |
|
|
|
0.02 |
|
|
|
29 450 835 |
|
|
0.51 |
1 000 0015 000 000 |
|
|
53 |
|
|
|
0.02 |
|
|
|
126 843 622 |
|
|
2.17 |
Over 5 000 000 |
|
|
24 |
|
|
|
0.01 |
|
|
|
5 141 984 212 |
|
|
88.11 |
Total |
|
|
237 700 |
|
|
|
100.00 |
|
|
|
5 836 055 012 |
|
|
100.00 |
(1) The
breakdown covers only shareholders registered in Finland, and each account operator (14) is included in the number of shareholders as only one registered shareholder. As a result, the breakdown is not illustrative of the entire shareholder base
of Nokia. |
By nationality |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of shares |
Non-Finnish shareholders |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
82.54 |
Finnish shareholders |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17.46 |
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
By shareholder category (Finnish shareholders) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of shares |
Corporations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.50 |
Households |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7.67 |
Financial and insurance institutions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.09 |
Non-profit organizations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.08 |
Governmental bodies (incl. pension insurance
companies) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.12 |
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17.46 |
As of December 31, 2016, a total of 617 976 509 ADSs (equivalent to the same number of shares or approximately 10.59% of
the total outstanding shares) were outstanding and held of record by 139 658 registered holders in the United States. We are aware that many ADSs are held of record by brokers and other nominees, and accordingly the above number of holders
is not necessarily representative of the actual number of persons who are beneficial holders of ADSs or the number of ADSs beneficially held by such persons. Based on information available from Automatic Data Processing Inc., the number of
beneficial owners of ADSs as of December 31, 2016 was 391 848.
Based on information known to us as of March 22, 2017, as of November 26, 2015
Blackrock, Inc. beneficially owned 287 009 903 Nokia shares or convertible bonds combined, which at that time corresponded to approximately 7.19% of the total number of shares and voting rights of Nokia. All of our shareholders have
the same voting rights, refer to Operating and financial review and prospectsShares and share capital.
To our knowledge, Nokia is not directly or
indirectly owned or controlled by any other corporation or any government, and there are no arrangements that may result in a change of control of Nokia.
|
|
|
NOKIA ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 20-F 2016 |
|
131 |
General facts on Nokia continued
Shares and stock options owned by the members of the Board and the Nokia Group Leadership Team
As of December 31, 2016, members of the Board and the Group Leadership Team owned an aggregate of 3 142 338 shares which represented approximately 0.05%
of the aggregate number of shares and voting rights. They also owned stock options which, if exercised in full, including both exercisable and non-exercisable stock options, would be exercisable for an additional 310 000 shares representing
approximately 0.005% of the total number of shares and voting rights as of December 31, 2016.
Authorizations
Authorizations to issue shares and special rights entitling to shares
At the Annual General Meeting held on May 5, 2015, Nokia shareholders authorized the Board to issue a maximum of 730 million shares through one or more
issues of shares or special rights entitling to shares. The Board was authorized to issue either new shares or shares held by the company. The authorization included the right for the Board to resolve on all the terms and conditions of such
share and special rights issuances, including issuance in deviation from the shareholders pre-emptive rights. The authorization may be used to develop the companys capital structure, diversify the shareholder base, finance or carry out
acquisitions or other arrangements, settle the companys equity-based incentive plans, or for other purposes resolved by the Board. The authorization that would have been effective until November 5, 2016 was terminated by a resolution of
Annual General Meeting on June 16, 2016.
At the Extraordinary General Meeting held on December 2, 2015, Nokia shareholders authorized the Board to issue,
in deviation from the shareholders pre-emptive right, a maximum of 2 100 million shares through one or more share issues. The authorization includes the right for the Board to resolve on all the terms and conditions of such share
issuances. The authorization may be used to issue Nokia shares to the holders of Alcatel Lucent shares, ADSs and convertible bonds as well as to beneficiaries of Alcatel Lucent employee equity compensation arrangements for the purpose of
implementing the transaction with Alcatel Lucent, including the consummation of the public exchange offers for all outstanding Alcatel Lucent securities made to Alcatel Lucent shareholders as well as other transactions contemplated by the
memorandum of understanding between Nokia and Alcatel Lucent, and/or otherwise to effect the combination of Nokia and Alcatel Lucent. The authorization is effective until December 2, 2020. On November 2, 2016 Nokia reached 100%
ownership of Alcatel Lucent.
At the Annual General Meeting held on June 16, 2016, Nokia shareholders authorized the Board to issue a maximum of 1
150 million shares through one or more issues of shares or special rights entitling to shares. The Board is authorized to issue either new shares or shares held by the company. The authorization includes the right for the Board to resolve
on all the terms and conditions of such share and special rights issuances, including issuance in deviation from the shareholders pre-emptive rights. The authorization may be used to develop the companys capital structure, diversify the
shareholder base, finance or carry out acquisitions or other arrangements, settle the companys equity-based incentive plans, or for other purposes resolved by the Board. The authorization is effective until December 16, 2017.
As of December 31, 2016, the Board had no other authorizations to issue shares, convertible bonds, warrants or stock options.
|
|
|
132 |
|
NOKIA ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 20-F 2016 |
Authorization to repurchase shares
At the
Annual General Meeting held on May 5, 2015, Nokia shareholders authorized the Board to repurchase a maximum of 365 million shares. The amount corresponded to less than 10% of the total number of the companys shares. The shares may be
repurchased in order to optimize the capital structure of the company, in order to finance or carry out acquisitions or other arrangements, to settle the companys equity-based incentive plans or to be transferred for other purposes. The
authorization that would have been effective until November 5, 2016 was terminated by a resolution of the Annual General Meeting on June 16, 2016.
At the
Annual General Meeting held on June 16, 2016, Nokia shareholders authorized the Board to repurchase a maximum of 575 million Nokia shares. The amount corresponds to less than 10% of the total number of the companys shares. The
shares may be repurchased in order to optimize the capital structure of the company, to finance or carry out acquisitions or other arrangements, to settle the companys equity-based incentive plans, or to be transferred for other purposes. The
authorization is effective until December 16, 2017.
On November 15, 2016, in line with its previously announced EUR 7 billion capital structure
optimization program, the Board resolved to commence a share repurchase program under the authorization granted by the Nokia Annual General Meeting on June 16, 2016. The Board resolved to repurchase a maximum of 575 million Nokia shares up
to an equivalent of EUR 1 billion.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Period |
|
|
Total number of
shares purchased |
|
|
|
Average
price paid per share, EUR |
|
|
|
Total number of shares
purchased as part of
publicly announced plans
or programs |
(1) |
|
|
Maximum value
of shares that may yet
be purchased under the
plans or programs, EUR |
|
January |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
February |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
April |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
May |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
July |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
August |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
October |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
November(2) |
|
|
20 880 143 |
|
|
|
3.95 |
|
|
|
20 880 143 |
|
|
|
917 499 980 |
|
December |
|
|
33 416 039 |
|
|
|
4.43 |
|
|
|
33 416 039 |
|
|
|
769 389 815 |
|
Total |
|
|
54 296 182 |
|
|
|
4.25 |
|
|
|
54 296 182 |
|
|
|
769 389 815 |
|
(1) |
On October 29, 2015 Nokia announced a capital structure optimization program including share repurchases. In line with the program, a EUR 1 billion share purchase program was announced on November 15, 2016.
|
(2) |
Repurchases commenced on November 16, 2016. |
|
|
|
NOKIA ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 20-F 2016 |
|
133 |
General facts on Nokia continued
Offer and listing details
Our capital consists
of shares traded on Nasdaq Helsinki under the symbol NOKIA and Euronext Paris under the symbol NOKIA. Our ADSs, each representing one of our shares, are traded on the NYSE under the symbol NOK. The ADSs are
evidenced by American Depositary Receipts (ADRs) issued by Citibank, N.A., as the Depositary under the Amended and Restated Deposit Agreement dated as of March 28, 2000 (as amended), among Nokia, Citibank, N.A. and registered
holders from time to time of ADRs, as amended on February 6, 2008.
The table below sets forth, for the periods indicated, the reported high and low quoted
prices for our shares on Nasdaq Helsinki and Euronext Paris, and the high and low quoted prices for the ADSs, as reported on the NYSE composite tape.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nasdaq
Helsinki
price per share |
|
|
|
|
New York Stock Exchange
price per ADS |
|
|
|
|
Euronext Paris
price per share(1) |
|
|
|
High |
|
|
Low |
|
|
|
|
High |
|
|
Low |
|
|
|
|
High |
|
|
Low |
|
|
|
EUR |
|
|
|
|
USD |
|
|
|
|
EUR |
|
2012 |
|
|
4.46 |
|
|
|
1.33 |
|
|
|
|
|
5.87 |
|
|
|
1.63 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2013 |
|
|
6.03 |
|
|
|
2.30 |
|
|
|
|
|
8.18 |
|
|
|
3.02 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2014 |
|
|
6.97 |
|
|
|
4.89 |
|
|
|
|
|
8.73 |
|
|
|
6.64 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2015 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Quarter |
|
|
7.38 |
|
|
|
6.33 |
|
|
|
|
|
8.14 |
|
|
|
7.40 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Second Quarter |
|
|
7.87 |
|
|
|
5.71 |
|
|
|
|
|
8.37 |
|
|
|
6.30 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Third Quarter |
|
|
6.55 |
|
|
|
4.91 |
|
|
|
|
|
7.10 |
|
|
|
5.71 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fourth Quarter |
|
|
7.11 |
|
|
|
5.92 |
|
|
|
|
|
7.63 |
|
|
|
6.53 |
|
|
|
|
|
7.15 |
|
|
|
6.29 |
|
Full year |
|
|
7.87 |
|
|
|
4.91 |
|
|
|
|
|
8.37 |
|
|
|
5.71 |
|
|
|
|
|
7.15 |
|
|
|
6.29 |
|
2016 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Quarter |
|
|
6.99 |
|
|
|
5.06 |
|
|
|
|
|
7.55 |
|
|
|
5.74 |
|
|
|
|
|
6.99 |
|
|
|
5.06 |
|
Second Quarter |
|
|
5.58 |
|
|
|
4.48 |
|
|
|
|
|
6.31 |
|
|
|
5.01 |
|
|
|
|
|
5.57 |
|
|
|
4.17 |
|
Third Quarter |
|
|
5.38 |
|
|
|
4.56 |
|
|
|
|
|
5.99 |
|
|
|
5.22 |
|
|
|
|
|
5.38 |
|
|
|
4.56 |
|
Fourth Quarter |
|
|
5.20 |
|
|
|
3.66 |
|
|
|
|
|
5.83 |
|
|
|
4.04 |
|
|
|
|
|
5.20 |
|
|
|
3.66 |
|
Full year |
|
|
6.99 |
|
|
|
3.66 |
|
|
|
|
|
7.55 |
|
|
|
4.04 |
|
|
|
|
|
6.99 |
|
|
|
3.66 |
|
Most recent six months |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 2016 |
|
|
5.20 |
|
|
|
4.78 |
|
|
|
|
|
5.89 |
|
|
|
5.40 |
|
|
|
|
|
5.20 |
|
|
|
4.78 |
|
October 2016 |
|
|
5.20 |
|
|
|
4.06 |
|
|
|
|
|
5.83 |
|
|
|
4.47 |
|
|
|
|
|
5.20 |
|
|
|
4.06 |
|
November 2016 |
|
|
4.17 |
|
|
|
3.66 |
|
|
|
|
|
4.53 |
|
|
|
4.04 |
|
|
|
|
|
4.17 |
|
|
|
3.66 |
|
December 2016 |
|
|
4.74 |
|
|
|
3.93 |
|
|
|
|
|
4.99 |
|
|
|
4.20 |
|
|
|
|
|
4.75 |
|
|
|
3.93 |
|
January 2017 |
|
|
4.67 |
|
|
|
4.15 |
|
|
|
|
|
4.99 |
|
|
|
4.50 |
|
|
|
|
|
4.71 |
|
|
|
4.15 |
|
February 2017 |
|
|
4.92 |
|
|
|
4.12 |
|
|
|
|
|
5.21 |
|
|
|
4.52 |
|
|
|
|
|
4.92 |
|
|
|
4.13 |
|
March 10,
2017(2) |
|
|
5.01 |
|
|
|
4.82 |
|
|
|
|
|
5.38 |
|
|
|
5.16 |
|
|
|
|
|
5.00 |
|
|
|
4.82 |
|
(1) |
Nokias listing and trading on Euronext Paris commenced on November 19, 2015. |
(2) |
For the period until March 10, 2017. |
Depositary fees and charges
ADS holders may have to pay the following service fees to the Depositary:
|
|
|
|
|
Service |
|
Fees (USD) |
|
Issuance of ADSs |
|
|
Up to 5 cents per ADS(1) |
|
Cancellation of ADSs |
|
|
Up to 5 cents per ADS(1) |
|
Distribution of cash dividends or other cash distributions |
|
|
Up to 2 cents per ADS(2) |
|
Distribution of ADSs pursuant to (i) stock dividends, free stock distributions or (ii) exercises
of rights to purchase additional ADSs |
|
|
Up to 5 cents per ADS(2) |
|
Distribution of securities other than ADSs or rights to purchase additional ADSs |
|
|
Up to 5 cents per ADS(1) |
|
ADR transfer fee |
|
|
1.50 per transfer(1) |
|
(1) |
These fees are typically paid to the Depositary by the brokers on behalf of their clients receiving the newly issued ADSs from the Depositary and by the brokers on behalf of their clients delivering the ADSs to the
Depositary for cancellation. The brokers in turn charge these transaction fees to their clients. |
(2) |
In practice, the Depositary has not collected these fees. If collected, such fees are offset against the related distribution made to the ADR holder. |
|
|
|
134 |
|
NOKIA ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 20-F 2016 |
Additionally, ADS holders are responsible for certain fees and expenses incurred by the Depositary on their behalf and
certain governmental charges such as taxes and registration fees, transmission and delivery expenses, conversion of foreign currency and fees relating to compliance with exchange control regulations. The fees and charges may vary over time.
In the event of refusal to pay the depositary fees, the Depositary may, under the terms of the deposit agreement, refuse the requested service until payment is received
or may set-off the amount of the depositary fees from any distribution to be made to the ADR holder.
Depositary payments in 2016
In 2016, our Depositary made the following payments on our behalf in relation to our ADR program.
|
|
|
|
|
Category |
|
Payment, USD |
|
Settlement infrastructure fees (including the Depositary Trust Company fees) |
|
|
1 134 238.33 |
|
Proxy process expenses (including printing, postage and distribution) |
|
|
741 811.94 |
|
ADS holder identification expenses |
|
|
71 459.99 |
|
Legal fees |
|
|
N/A |
|
NYSE listing fees |
|
|
554 639.00 |
|
Total |
|
|
2 502 149.26 |
|
Additionally for 2016, our Depositary has agreed to reimburse us USD 2 662 184 mainly related to contributions towards our investor
relations activities, including investor meetings and conferences and fees of investor relations service vendors, and other miscellaneous expenses related to the United States listing of our ADSs.
Related party transactions
Other than the paid compensation, as described above, there have been no material transactions during the last three fiscal years to which any director, executive
officer or 5% shareholder, or any relative or spouse of any of them, was a party. There is no significant outstanding indebtedness owed to Nokia by any director, executive officer or 5% shareholder.
In 2016, through the Acquisition of Alcatel Lucent, we also acquired Alcatel-Lucent Shanghai Bell Co. Ltd (ASB), a partly owned subsidiary incorporated in
China, which has a counterparty, China Huaxin, with a non-controlling interest (50% less one share) that is material to the Group. ASB, with its subsidiaries in China and the rest of the world, including the RFS Group, comprise the Alcatel-Lucent
Shanghai Bell Group. Refer to Note 33, Significant partly-owned subsidiaries, and Note 35, Related party transactions, of our consolidated financial statements included in this annual report on Form 20-F.
Production of infrastructure equipment
and products
Our operations team handles the supply chain management of all its hardware, software and original equipment manufacturer products. This
includes supply planning, manufacturing, distribution, procurement, logistics and supply.
On December 31, 2016, we had twelve manufacturing facilities
globally: one in Australia, one in Brazil, three in China, one in Finland, two in France, one in Germany, one in India, one in the United Kingdom and one in the United States.
Most of our production and assembly is outsourced, while the remaining portion is carried out in our production sites. This system provides us with considerable
flexibility in our manufacturing and enables us to meet demands related to cost, availability and customer requirements more easily.
The table below shows the
productive capacity per location of significant manufacturing facilities for our infrastructure equipment on December 31, 2016.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Country |
|
Location and products(1) |
|
|
Productive
capacity, Net (m2) |
(2) |
Australia |
|
Kilsyth: radio frequency systems |
|
|
5 000 |
|
Brazil |
|
Embu: radio frequency systems |
|
|
7 800 |
|
China |
|
Shanghai: fixed access and wireless access systems |
|
|
23 000 |
|
China |
|
Shanghai (cable): radio frequency systems |
|
|
9 200 |
|
China |
|
Shanghai (antenna): radio frequency systems |
|
|
5 600 |
|
Finland |
|
Oulu: base stations |
|
|
16 000 |
|
France |
|
Calais: submarine cables |
|
|
48 000 |
|
France |
|
Trignac: radio frequency systems |
|
|
10 200 |
|
Germany |
|
Hanover: radio frequency systems |
|
|
21 000 |
|
India |
|
Chennai: base stations, radio controllers and transmission
systems |
|
|
12 800 |
|
UK |
|
Greenwich: submarine cables |
|
|
19 500 |
|
USA |
|
Meriden: radio frequency systems |
|
|
31 000 |
|
(1) |
We consider the production capacity of our manufacturing network to be sufficient to meet the requirements of its network infrastructure business. The extent of utilization of our manufacturing facilities varies
from plant to plant and from time to time during the year. |
|
None of these facilities is subject to a material encumbrance. |
(2) |
Productive capacity equals the total area allotted to manufacturing and to the storage of manufacturing-related materials.
|
|
|
|
NOKIA ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 20-F 2016 |
|
135 |
General facts on Nokia continued
Key ratios
Operating profit
Profit before interest and taxes
Earnings per share (basic)
Profit attributable to equity holders of the
parent
Average number of shares during the year
Earnings per share
(diluted)
Adjusted profit attributable to equity holders of the parent
Average number of shares during the year adjusted for the
effect of dilutive
shares
P/E ratio
Closing share price as of
December 31
Earnings per share (basic) for Continuing operations
Payout ratio
Dividend per
share
Earnings per share (basic) for Continuing
operations
Dividend yield %
Dividend per
share
Closing share price as of December 31
Shareholders equity per share
Capital and reserves attributable to equity holders of the parent
Number of shares as of December 31number of treasury shares
as of December 31
Market capitalization
(Number of shares as of December 31number of treasury shares
as of December 31) x closing share price as of December 31
Share
turnover %
Number of shares traded during the year
Average number of shares during the year
Interest-bearing liabilities
Long-term interest-bearing liabilities (including the current
portion thereof) + short-term borrowings
Net cash
Total cash and other liquid assetsinterest-bearing liabilities
Controls and procedures
Our management, with the participation of our President and CEO and our Chief Financial Officer, conducted an evaluation pursuant to Rule 13a-15 promulgated under
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, of the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures as of December 31, 2016. On January 4, 2016, we acquired Alcatel Lucent in a purchase business combination and as permitted by
the Commission, our management has excluded the acquired business from its assessment of the effectiveness of disclosure controls and procedures as of December 31, 2016. Based on such evaluation, our President and CEO and our Chief
Financial Officer have concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective.
Disclosure controls and procedures means controls and other procedures
that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in the reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported, within the time periods specified in the
Commissions rules and forms, and that such information required to be disclosed by us in the reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our principal executive and
principal financial officers, or persons performing similar functions, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosures.
Managements annual report on internal control over financial reporting
Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting for Nokia. Our internal control over financial
reporting is designed to provide reasonable assurance to our management and the Board regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation and fair presentation of published financial statements. Because of its inherent limitations,
internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Therefore, even those systems determined to be effective can provide only reasonable assurances with respect to financial statement preparation and
presentation. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or
procedures may decline.
Our management evaluated the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting based on the COSO framework (2013 version). Our
evaluation excluded the business acquired through the Acquisition of Alcatel Lucent which we acquired on January 4, 2016. Alcatel Lucents sales constituted approximately 51% of our sales for fiscal year 2016, and Alcatel Lucents
assets constituted approximately 42% of our total assets as of December 31, 2016. Based on this evaluation, our management has assessed the effectiveness of Nokias internal control over financial reporting at December 31, 2016
and concluded that such internal control over financial reporting is effective.
The effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of
December 31, 2016 has been audited by PricewaterhouseCoopers Oy, an independent registered public accounting firm, as stated in their report which appears on page 214 of this Annual Report on Form 20-F.
|
|
|
136 |
|
NOKIA ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 20-F 2016 |
Material weaknesses in the acquired business
On January 4, 2016, we acquired Alcatel Lucent in a purchase business combination. We have excluded Alcatel Lucent from the December 31, 2016 evaluation of
the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting and disclosure controls and procedures. In 2016, our management identified two material weaknesses in internal control over financial reporting in the acquired business.
A material weakness is a deficiency, or combination of deficiencies, in internal control over financial reporting, such that there is a reasonable possibility that a
material misstatement of our annual financial statements will not be prevented or detected on a timely basis.
Accounting for income taxes
in the United States
In reviewing our accounting for income taxes for the year ended December 31, 2016 at a subsidiary of Alcatel Lucent in the
United States, our management identified a material weakness in internal control over financial reporting related to the accounting for income taxes.
Specifically, the subsidiarys controls did not adequately identify all changes to deferred tax assets at the entity resulting primarily from a tax election
made in the fourth quarter of 2016, which is described in Operating and financial review and prospectsProvision for Income Taxes in this Form 20-F. Nonetheless, we have concluded that this material weakness does not require a
change to the fourth quarter or full year 2016 consolidated financial results that we released in February 2017.
As Alcatel Lucent was acquired during 2016,
this material weakness in internal control over financial reporting does not impact our consolidated financial statements for any prior annual period.
Controls over revenue recognition in China
Subsequent to the Acquisition of Alcatel Lucent, management identified errors in the
accounting for certain revenue transactions at a subsidiary of Alcatel Lucent in China. After conducting investigation of these matters, our management has concluded that a material weakness exists over the timing and amount of
revenue recognition at that subsidiary.
Specifically, we did not maintain adequate controls over the assignment of roles and responsibilities between the
accounting, operations and sales departments, controls over invoicing and cash application, or effective monitoring controls which resulted in revenue being recognized prior to valid delivery and customer acceptance. In response
to the existence of these matters, our management has completed a detailed review of the results of the subsidiary and the statements of financial position as of the date of the Acquisition of Alcatel Lucent and as of December 31,
2016 and has concluded that the identified errors did not materially impact our consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2016.
As Alcatel Lucent was acquired during 2016, this material weakness in internal control over financial reporting does not impact our consolidated financial
statements for any prior annual period.
Managements plans for remediation of the material weaknesses
With the oversight of our Audit Committee, our management has begun implementing a remediation plan to address the control deficiencies that resulted in the identified
material weaknesses.
For the material weakness related to accounting for income taxes in the United States, the remediation plan includes the following:
(i) continued efforts to integrate the local tax reporting processes throughout the Group and the implementation of standard income tax accounting systems and controls to ensure consistent execution of income tax accounting;
(ii) augmentation of our tax accounting resources with the requisite skillsets to supplement the current complement of tax professionals in place; and (iii) providing additional income tax accounting training to our relevant United States
tax professionals. Our plan is to remediate this material weakness in 2017.
For the material weakness related to revenue recognition in China, the remediation
plan includes the following: (i) changes in the roles and responsibilities of the accounting, operations and sales departments in the areas of revenue recognition and enhancements to the invoicing and cash application controls;
(ii) implementation of additional monitoring controls over the operations of the entity; (iii) enhancing resources to ensure qualified staffing in all key positions in the affected areas; and (iv) providing continued
reinforcement of Nokias culture of compliance and training to employees who are in positions of authority to embed Nokias culture and behaviors. Our plan is to remediate this material weakness in 2017.
Changes in internal control over financial reporting
As noted above, our
evaluation of internal controls excluded Alcatel Lucent, which was acquired on January 4, 2016 and which previously operated under its own set of systems and internal controls. During the integration period, our management is harmonizing
certain processes within the acquired business to be able to integrate and test the effectiveness of Alcatel Lucents internal controls over financial reporting in 2017.
Except as noted above, there were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the year ended December 31, 2016 that have
materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Groups internal control over financial reporting.
|
|
|
NOKIA ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 20-F 2016 |
|
137 |
General facts on Nokia continued
Attestation report of the registered public accounting firm
Refer to the auditors report on page 214.
Exchange controls
There are currently no Finnish laws which may affect the import or export of capital, or the remittance of dividends, interest or other payments.
Government regulation
Nokia and its businesses are subject to direct and indirect regulation in each of the countries in which we, the companies with which we work and our customers do
business. As a result, changes in or uncertainties related to various types of regulations applicable to current or new technologies, intellectual property, products and services could affect our business adversely. Moreover, the implementation of
technological or legal requirements could impact our products and services, technology and patent licensing activities, manufacturing and distribution processes, and could affect the timing of product and services introductions and the cost of our
production, products and services, as well as their commercial success. Also, our business is subject to the impacts of changes in economic and trade policies or regulation favoring the local industry participants, as well as other measures with
potentially protectionist objectives that the host governments in different countries may take. Export control, tariffs or other fees or levies imposed on our products and services, environmental, product safety and security and other
regulations that adversely affect the export, import, pricing or costs of our products and services as well as export prohibitions (sanctions) enacted by the EU, the United States or other countries or regions could adversely affect our net sales
and results of operations.
For example, in the United States, our products and services are subject to a wide range of government regulations that might
have a direct impact on our business, including, but not limited to, regulation related to product certification, standards, spectrum management, provision of telecommunications services, privacy and data protection, competition and
sustainability. The EU-level or local member state regulation has a direct impact in many areas on our business, markets and customers within the EU. The European regulation influences, for example, conditions for innovation for
telecommunications infrastructure and internet and related services, location platform and associated services as well as technology and patent licensing; investment in fixed and wireless broadband communication infrastructure and
operation of global data flows. In China, new partly local telecommunications standards have been enacted that may affect production processes and have an impact on our business. Additionally, with respect to certain developing market
countries, for example, in Asia and in Latin and South America, the business environment we operate in can pose risks to our business due to unpredictable, discriminatory or protectionist regulation.
We are in continuous dialog with relevant state agencies, regulators and other decision makers through our government
relations representatives in Washington, D.C., Paris, Brussels, Espoo, Berlin, Beijing, Moscow, São Paulo, Dubai, Singapore and Delhi as well as through our experts, industry associations and representatives in the regions of Asia, the Middle
East and Africa, Europe, Latin America and North America in order to proactively exchange views and address the impact of any planned changes to the regulatory environment on our business activities.
Sales in U.S.-sanctioned countries
General
We are a global company and have sales in most countries of the
world. For more information on our organizational structure refer to OverviewThis is NokiaOrganizational structure and reportable segments and Note 4, Segment information, of our consolidated financial statements
included in this annual report on Form 20-F. The region of Crimea as well as Cuba, Iran, North Korea, Sudan and Syria are targets of comprehensive United States economic sanctions.
Continuing operations
In Iran, we provide telecommunications equipment with
ancillary services to various network operator customers and internet service providers through our Networks business. None of the equipment and services delivered by us in Iran is intended for military purposes, or intended to be used for the
purpose of limiting political discourse, blocking legitimate forms of free speech or conducting surveillance of individuals.
In Cuba, we provide
telecommunications equipment with local services to ETECSA, the exclusive Cuban public operator of mobile and fixed telecommunications networks, through our Networks business. In addition, we have provided local services through a joint venture
with a Cuban government-owned entity. Our aggregate sales in Cuba consisted primarily of fixed, IP and transmission technology, and amounted to approximately EUR 7.3 million in 2016. We did not have any sales in Cuba in 2015 or
2014.
We have discontinued sales to customers in Syria and did not generate any revenue in Syria during 2016. We did not have any sales in North Korea, Sudan, or
in the region of Crimea in 2016, 2015 or 2014.
Our aggregate net sales in 2016 to customers in Iran, Sudan and Syria accounted for approximately 0.37% of
Nokias Continuing operations total net sales, or approximately EUR 88 million. In 2015, our aggregate sales to customers in Iran, Sudan and Syria amounted to approximately EUR 62 million, which accounted for approximately 0.5% of
Continuing operations total net sales; and EUR 5 million in 2014, which accounted for approximately 0.04% of Continuing operations total net sales.
|
|
|
138 |
|
NOKIA ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 20-F 2016 |
Our Nokia Technologies business did not have sales in Cuba, Iran, North Korea, Sudan, Syria or in the region of Crimea,
during 2016, 2015 or 2014.
We cannot exclude the possibility that third parties acting independently from us have exported our products to these countries from
other countries in which we sell them, or that, for services distributed through the internet, third parties could have accessed them in markets or countries for which they are not intended by circumventing the industry standard protective
mechanisms, such as IP address blocks, despite our efforts in implementing measures to prevent such actions.
Discontinued operations
In 2016 and 2015, our Discontinued operations did not generate any revenue in Cuba, Iran, Sudan or Syria. Our aggregate net sales to customers through our
Discontinued operations for 2014 in Iran, Sudan and Syria accounted for approximately 0.20% of our total net sales, or EUR 24 million; and approximately 0.70% of Discontinued operations total net sales.
Disclosure pursuant to Section 219 of the Iran Threat Reduction and Syria Human Rights Act of 2012
We continue to operate in Iran in compliance with applicable economic sanctions and other trade-related laws. In connection with the business activities relating to
Iran, we currently have two local offices in Iran that employ 50 employees through a branch of a Finnish subsidiary and three employees through a branch of Alcatel Lucent International. Nokia also maintains a shareholding in Pishahang
Communications Network Development Company (Pishahang). Nokia holds 49% of the outstanding shares of Pishahang. The other major shareholder in Pishahang is Information Technology Application Development TACFAM Company
(Tacfam) which holds 49% of the outstanding shares. Pishahang has been historically the contracting entity for Nokia in Nokias transactions with MTN-Irancell, and Pishahang has not pursued, nor does it intend to pursue any
other business.
We maintain routine contacts with governmental agencies in Iran as required, for example, to maintain a legal presence and office facilities
in Iran, pay taxes and employ Iranian nationals.
To our knowledge, none of our sales in Iran in 2016 are required to be disclosed pursuant to ITRA Section 219, with
the possible exception of the following:
In 2016, we provided radio, core and transmission equipment, including associated services, to Iranian mobile network
operators, Mobile Communications Company of Iran (MCCI) and MTN Irancell, as well as two local internet service providers, Shatel Group and Pars Online. Also, RFS, a wholly owned subsidiary of Alcatel-Shanghai Bell, has in 2016 sold
wireless infrastructure products through an Iranian distributor, FourSat Kish. Additionally in 2016, we purchased certain fixed line telephony services from Telecommunication Company of Iran (TCI).
Moreover, our subsidiary, Alcatel-Lucent Deutschland AG, in 2013 reached a settlement agreement with Iranian Telecommunication Manufacturing Company Public Stock
Corporation (ITMC) on claims raised by ITMC related to contracts that were completed prior to 2007 for the delivery of telecommunications equipment and services. In the course of these contracts, performance bonds had been opened
between 2001 and 2006 at Bank Tejarat, Bank Saderat and Bank Mellat and had been retained by ITMC as security against their claims. The settlement agreement stipulates that Alcatel-Lucent Deutschland AG shall pay EUR 1.6 million to ITMC as
settlement for the claims and that, in return, performance bonds held by ITMC shall be released. In 2016, the performance bonds held by ITMC have reduced in value from EUR 1.6 million to EUR 1.35 million. Payment of the settlement amount
remains pending.
We further maintain, through our Alcatel Lucent branch offices, bank accounts at Bank Tejarat for purposes of carrying out routine financial
transactions.
Although it is difficult to evaluate with any reasonable degree of certainty, we have concluded that we cannot exclude the possibility that TCI,
MCCI, MTN Irancell, Shatel, Pars Online, ITMC, FourSat Kish or Tacfam is owned or controlled, directly or indirectly, by the government of Iran.
None of these
activities involve U.S. affiliates of Nokia or Alcatel Lucent, or any U.S. persons.
In 2016, we recognized sales revenue of EUR 62.5 million and a
net profit of EUR 25.5 million from business with MCCI, and sales revenue of EUR 22.5 million and a net loss of EUR 6.7 million from business with MTN Irancell. Furthermore, we recognized sales revenue of EUR
2.2 million and a net profit of EUR 0.6 million from business with Pars Online, and sales revenue of EUR 0.8 million and a net profit of EUR 0.5 million from business with Shatel. Moreover, RFS recognized sales revenue
of approximately EUR 0.06 million, and net profit of EUR 0.02 million from business with FourSat Kish.
We intend to continue and seek to
expand our business activities in Iran in compliance with applicable economic sanctions and other trade-related laws.
|
|
|
NOKIA ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 20-F 2016 |
|
139 |
General facts on Nokia continued
Taxation
General
The statements of U.S. and Finnish tax laws set out below are based
on the laws in force as of the date of this annual report on Form 20-F and may be subject to any changes in U.S. or Finnish law, and in any double taxation convention or treaty between the United States and Finland, occurring after that date,
possibly with retroactive effect.
For purposes of this summary, beneficial owners of ADSs that hold the ADSs as capital assets and that are considered residents of
the United States for purposes of the current income tax convention between the United States and Finland, signed on September 21, 1989 (as amended by a protocol signed on May 31, 2006), referred to as the Treaty, and that
are entitled to the benefits of the Treaty under the Limitation on Benefits provisions contained in the Treaty, are referred to as U.S. Holders. Beneficial owners that are citizens or residents of the United States,
corporations created in or organized under U.S. law, and estates or trusts (to the extent their income is subject to U.S. tax either directly or in the hands of beneficiaries) generally will be considered to be residents of the United States under
the Treaty. Special rules apply to U.S. Holders that are also residents of Finland and to citizens or residents of the United States that do not maintain a substantial presence, permanent home or habitual abode in the United States.
For purposes of this discussion, it is assumed that the Depositary and its custodian will perform all actions as required by the deposit agreement with the Depositary and other related agreements between the Depositary and Nokia.
If a partnership holds ADSs (including for this purpose any entity or arrangement treated as a partnership for U.S. federal income tax purposes), the tax treatment
of a partner will depend upon the status of the partner and activities of the partnership. If a U.S. Holder is a partnership or a partner in a partnership that holds ADSs, the holder is urged to consult its own tax adviser regarding the
specific tax consequences of owning and disposing of its ADSs.
Because this summary is not exhaustive of all possible tax considerationssuch as situations
involving financial institutions, banks, tax-exempt entities, pension funds, U.S. expatriates, real estate investment trusts, persons that are dealers in securities, persons who own (directly, indirectly or by attribution) 10% or more of the share
capital or voting stock of Nokia, persons who acquired their ADSs pursuant to the exercise of employee stock options or otherwise as compensation, or U.S. Holders whose functional currency is not the U.S. dollar, who may be subject to special
rules that are not discussed hereinholders of shares or ADSs that are U.S. Holders are advised to satisfy themselves as to the overall U.S. federal, state and local tax consequences, as well as to the overall Finnish and other applicable
non-U.S. tax consequences, of their ownership of ADSs and the underlying shares by consulting their own tax advisers. This summary does not discuss the treatment of ADSs that are held in connection with a permanent establishment or fixed base in
Finland, and it does not address the U.S. Medicare tax on certain investment income.
For the purposes of both the Treaty and the U.S. Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, referred to as the
Code, U.S. Holders of ADSs will be treated as the owners of the underlying shares that are represented by those ADSs. Accordingly, the following discussion, except where otherwise expressly noted, applies equally to U.S. Holders of ADSs,
on the one hand, and of shares on the other.
The holders of ADSs will, for Finnish tax purposes, be treated as the owners of the shares that are represented by the
ADSs. The Finnish tax consequences to the holders of shares, as discussed below, also apply to the holders of ADSs.
U.S. and Finnish taxation of cash
dividends
For U.S. federal income tax purposes, the gross amount of dividends paid to U.S. Holders of shares or ADSs, including any related Finnish withholding
tax, generally will be included in gross income as foreign source dividend income. We do not expect to maintain calculations of our earnings and profits under U.S. federal income tax principles; therefore, U.S. Holders should expect that the
entire amount of any distribution generally will be reported as dividend income. Dividends will not be eligible for the dividends received deduction allowed to corporations under Section 243 of the Code. The amount includible in income
(including any Finnish withholding tax) will equal the U.S. dollar value of the payment, determined at the time such payment is received by the Depositary (in the case of ADSs) or by the U.S. Holder (in the case of shares), regardless of
whether the payment is in fact converted into U.S. dollars. Generally, any gain or loss resulting from currency exchange rate fluctuations during the period between the time such payment is received and the date the dividend payment is converted
into U.S. dollars will be treated as U.S. source ordinary income or loss to a U.S. Holder.
Special rules govern and specific elections are available to accrual
method taxpayers to determine the U.S. dollar amount includible in income in the case of a dividend paid (and taxes withheld) in foreign currency. Accrual basis taxpayers are urged to consult their own tax advisers regarding the requirements and
elections applicable in this regard.
Under the Finnish Income Tax Act and Act on Taxation of Non-residents Income, non-residents of Finland are
generally subject to a withholding tax at a rate of 30% payable on dividends paid by a Finnish resident company. However, pursuant to the Treaty, dividends paid to U.S. Holders generally will be subject to Finnish withholding tax at a reduced
rate of 15% of the gross amount of the dividend.
|
|
|
140 |
|
NOKIA ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 20-F 2016 |
Qualifying pension funds are, however, pursuant to the Treaty exempt from Finnish withholding tax. Refer also to
Finnish withholding taxes on nominee registered shares below.
Subject to conditions and limitations, Finnish income taxes withheld will be
treated as foreign taxes eligible for credit against a U.S. Holders U.S. federal income tax liability. Dividends received generally will constitute foreign source passive category income for foreign tax credit purposes. In lieu of
a credit, a U.S. Holder may elect to deduct all of its foreign taxes provided the deduction is claimed for all of the foreign taxes paid by the U.S. Holder in a particular year. A deduction does not reduce U.S. tax on a dollar-for-dollar basis
like a tax credit. The deduction, however, is not subject to the limitations applicable to foreign tax credits.
Provided that certain holding period and
other requirements are met, certain U.S. Holders (including individuals and some trusts and estates) are eligible for reduced rates of U.S. federal income tax at a maximum rate of 20% in respect of qualified dividend income. Dividends
that Nokia pays with respect to its shares and ADSs generally will be qualified dividend income if Nokia was not, in the year prior to the year in which the dividend was paid, and is not, in the year in which the dividend is paid, a
passive foreign investment company (PFIC). Nokia currently believes that dividends paid with respect to its shares and ADSs will constitute qualified dividend income for U.S. federal income tax purposes; however, this is a factual matter
and is subject to change. Nokia anticipates that its dividends will be reported as qualified dividends on Forms 1099-DIV delivered to U.S. Holders. U.S. Holders of shares or ADSs are urged to consult their own tax advisers regarding the
availability to them of the reduced dividend tax rate in light of their own particular situation and the computations of their foreign tax credit limitation with respect to any qualified dividends paid to them, as applicable.
We believe we should not be classified as a PFIC for U.S. federal income tax purposes for the taxable year ended December 31, 2016 and we do not expect to become a
PFIC in the foreseeable future. U.S. Holders are advised, however, that this conclusion is a factual determination that must be made annually and thus may be subject to change. If we were to be classified as a PFIC, the tax on distributions on our
shares or ADSs and on any gains realized upon the disposition of our shares or ADSs generally would be less favorable than as described herein. Dividends paid by a PFIC are not qualified dividend income and are not eligible for reduced
rates of taxation. Additionally, U.S. persons that are shareholders in a PFIC generally will be required to file an annual report disclosing the ownership of such shares and certain other information as yet to be determined. U.S. Holders should
consult their own tax advisers regarding the application of the PFIC rules (including the new reporting requirements) to their ownership of our shares or ADSs.
The U.S. Treasury has expressed concern that parties to whom ADSs are released may be taking actions inconsistent with
the claiming of foreign tax credits or reduced rates in respect of qualified dividends by U.S. Holders of ADSs. Accordingly, the analysis of the creditability of Finnish withholding taxes or the availability of qualified dividend treatment
could be affected by future actions that may be taken by the U.S. Treasury with respect to ADSs.
Finnish withholding taxes on nominee registered shares
Generally, for U.S. Holders, the reduced 15% withholding tax rate of the Treaty (instead of 30%) is applicable to dividends paid to nominee registered
shares only when the conditions of the provisions applied to dividends are met (Section 10b of the Finnish Act on Taxation of Non-residents Income).
According to the provisions, the Finnish account operator and a foreign custodian are required to have a custody agreement, according to which the custodian undertakes
to (a) declare the country of residence of the beneficial owner of the dividend, (b) confirm the applicability of the Treaty to the dividend, (c) inform the account operator of any changes to the country of residence or the
applicability of the Treaty, and (d) provide the legal identification and address of the beneficial owner of the dividend and a certificate of residence issued by the local tax authorities upon request. It is further required that the foreign
custodian is domiciled in a country with which Finland has entered into a treaty for the avoidance of double taxation and that the custodian is entered into the register of foreign custodians maintained by the Finnish tax authorities.
In general, if based on an applicable treaty for the avoidance of double taxation the withholding tax rate for dividends is 15% or higher, the treaty rate may be
applied when the aforementioned conditions of the provisions are met (Section 10b of the Finnish Act on Taxation of Non-residents Income). A lower rate than 15% may be applied based on the applicable treaty for the avoidance of
double taxation only when the following information on the beneficial owner of the dividend is provided to the payer prior to the dividend payment: name, date of birth or business ID (if applicable) and address in the country of residence.
|
|
|
NOKIA ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 20-F 2016 |
|
141 |
General facts on Nokia continued
U.S. and Finnish tax on sale or other disposition
A U.S. Holder generally will recognize taxable capital gain or loss on the sale or other disposition of ADSs in an amount equal to the difference between the U.S.
dollar value of the amount realized and the adjusted tax basis (determined in U.S. dollars) in the ADSs. If the ADSs are held as a capital asset, this gain or loss generally will be long-term capital gain or loss if, at the time of the sale, the
ADSs have been held for more than one year. Any capital gain or loss, for foreign tax credit purposes, generally will constitute U.S. source gain or loss. In the case of a U.S. Holder that is an individual, long-term capital gain generally
is subject to U.S. federal income tax at preferential rates. The deductibility of capital losses is subject to significant limitations.
The deposit or
withdrawal by a U.S. Holder of shares in exchange for ADSs or of ADSs for shares under the deposit agreement generally will not be subject to U.S. federal income tax or Finnish income tax.
The sale by a U.S. Holder of the ADSs or the underlying shares, other than an individual who, by reason of his residence in Finland for a period exceeding six months,
is or becomes liable for Finnish income tax according to the relevant provisions of Finnish tax law, generally will not be subject to income tax in Finland, in accordance with Finnish tax law and the Treaty.
Finnish transfer tax
Transfers of shares and ADSs could be subject to the
Finnish transfer tax only when one of the parties to the transfer is subject to Finnish taxation under the Finnish Income Tax Act by virtue of being a resident of Finland or a Finnish branch of a non-Finnish (a) credit institution
(b) investment firm (c) management company of collective investment undertaking or (d) alternative investment fund manager. In accordance with the amendments in the Finnish Transfer Tax Act (applicable from November 9, 2007) no
transfer tax is payable on the transfer of publicly traded shares or ADSs (irrespective of whether the transfer is carried out on a stock exchange or not). However, there are certain conditions for the exemption. Prior to the said amendments,
transfer tax was not payable on stock exchange transfers. In cases where the transfer tax would be payable, the transfer tax would be 1.6% of the transfer value of the security traded.
Finnish inheritance and gift taxes
A transfer of an underlying share by gift or by reason of the death of a U.S. Holder and the transfer of an ADS are not subject to Finnish gift or inheritance tax
provided that none of the deceased person, the donor, the beneficiary of the deceased person or the recipient of the gift is resident in Finland.
Non-residents
of the United States
Beneficial owners of ADSs that are not U.S. Holders will not be subject to U.S. federal income tax on dividends received with respect
to ADSs unless such dividend income is effectively connected with the conduct of a trade or business within the United States. Similarly, non-U.S. Holders generally will not be subject to U.S. federal income tax on any gain realized on the sale or
other disposition of ADSs, unless (a) the gain is effectively connected with the conduct of a trade or business in the United States or (b) in the case of an individual, that individual is present in the United States for 183 days or
more in the taxable year of the disposition and other conditions are met.
U.S. information reporting and backup withholding
Dividend payments with respect to shares or ADSs and proceeds from the sale or other disposition of shares or ADSs may be subject to information reporting to
the Internal Revenue Service and possible U.S. backup withholding. Backup withholding will not apply to a holder if the holder furnishes a correct taxpayer identification number or certificate of foreign status and makes any other required
certification in connection therewith, or if it is a recipient otherwise exempt from backup withholding (such as a corporation). Any U.S. person required to establish their exempt status generally must furnish a duly completed IRS Form W-9
(Request for Taxpayer Identification Number and Certification). Non-U.S. holders generally are not subject to U.S. information reporting or backup withholding. However, such holders may be required to provide certification of non-U.S. status
(generally on IRS Form W-8BEN for individuals and Form W-8BEN-E for corporations) in connection with payments received in the United States or through certain U.S.-related financial intermediaries. Backup withholding is not an additional tax.
Amounts withheld as backup withholding may be credited against a holders U.S. federal income tax liability, and the holder may obtain a refund of any excess amounts withheld under the backup withholding rules by timely filing the
appropriate claim for refund with the Internal Revenue Service and furnishing the proper required information.
|
|
|
142 |
|
NOKIA ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 20-F 2016 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial statements
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NOKIA ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 20-F 2016 |
|
143 |
Consolidated income statement
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2016 |
|
|
2015(1) |
|
|
2014(1) |
|
For the year ended December 31 |
|
Notes |
|
|
EURm |
|
|
EURm |
|
|
EURm |
|
Net sales |
|
|
4, 7 |
|
|
|
23 614 |
|
|
|
12 499 |
|
|
|
11 762 |
|
Cost of sales |
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
(15 158 |
) |
|
|
(6 963 |
) |
|
|
(6 774 |
) |
Gross profit |
|
|
|
|
|
|
8 456 |
|
|
|
5 536 |
|
|
|
4 988 |
|
Research and development expenses |
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
(4 904 |
) |
|
|
(2 080 |
) |
|
|
(1 904 |
) |
Selling, general and administrative expenses |
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
(3 819 |
) |
|
|
(1 772 |
) |
|
|
(1 559 |
) |
Other income |
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
116 |
|
|
|
236 |
|
|
|
118 |
|
Other expenses |
|
|
8, 10 |
|
|
|
(949 |
) |
|
|
(223 |
) |
|
|
(229 |
) |
Operating (loss)/profit |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1 100 |
) |
|
|
1 697 |
|
|
|
1 414 |
|
Share of results of associated companies and joint ventures |
|
|
34 |
|
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
29 |
|
|
|
(12 |
) |
Financial income and expenses |
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
(287 |
) |
|
|
(186 |
) |
|
|
(403 |
) |
(Loss)/profit before tax |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1 369 |
) |
|
|
1 540 |
|
|
|
999 |
|
Income tax benefit/(expense) |
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
457 |
|
|
|
(346 |
) |
|
|
1 719 |
|
(Loss)/profit for the year from
Continuing operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(912 |
) |
|
|
1 194 |
|
|
|
2 718 |
|
(Loss)/profit for the year from Continuing operations attributable
to: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity holders of the parent |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(751 |
) |
|
|
1 192 |
|
|
|
2 710 |
|
Non-controlling interests |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(161 |
) |
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
(Loss)/profit for the year from
Continuing operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(912 |
) |
|
|
1 194 |
|
|
|
2 718 |
|
(Loss)/profit for the year from Discontinued operations attributable
to: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity holders of the parent |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(15 |
) |
|
|
1 274 |
|
|
|
752 |
|
Non-controlling interests |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6 |
|
(Loss)/profit for the year from
Discontinued operations |
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
(15 |
) |
|
|
1 274 |
|
|
|
758 |
|
(Loss)/profit for the year attributable to: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity holders of the parent |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(766 |
) |
|
|
2 466 |
|
|
|
3 462 |
|
Non-controlling interests |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(161 |
) |
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
14 |
|
(Loss)/profit for the
year |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(927 |
) |
|
|
2 468 |
|
|
|
3 476 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings per share attributable to equity holders of the parent |
|
13 |
|
|
EUR |
|
|
EUR |
|
|
EUR |
|
Basic earnings per share |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Continuing operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.13 |
) |
|
|
0.32 |
|
|
|
0.73 |
|
Discontinued operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.00 |
|
|
|
0.35 |
|
|
|
0.20 |
|
(Loss)/profit for the year |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.13 |
) |
|
|
0.67 |
|
|
|
0.94 |
|
Diluted earnings per share |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Continuing operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.13 |
) |
|
|
0.31 |
|
|
|
0.67 |
|
Discontinued operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.00 |
|
|
|
0.32 |
|
|
|
0.18 |
|
(Loss)/profit for the year |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.13 |
) |
|
|
0.63 |
|
|
|
0.85 |
|
Average number of shares |
|
|
|
|
000s shares |
|
|
000s shares |
|
|
000s shares |
|
Basic |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Continuing operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
5 732 371 |
|
|
|
3 670 934 |
|
|
|
3 698 723 |
|
Discontinued operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
5 732 371 |
|
|
|
3 670 934 |
|
|
|
3 698 723 |
|
(Loss)/profit for the year |
|
|
|
|
|
|
5 732 371 |
|
|
|
3 670 934 |
|
|
|
3 698 723 |
|
Diluted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Continuing operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
5 741 117 |
|
|
|
3 949 312 |
|
|
|
4 131 602 |
|
Discontinued operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
5 741 117 |
|
|
|
3 949 312 |
|
|
|
4 131 602 |
|
(Loss)/profit for the year |
|
|
|
|
|
|
5 741 117 |
|
|
|
3 949 312 |
|
|
|
4 131 602 |
|
(1) |
In 2016, following the Acquisition of Alcatel Lucent, the Group adopted a new financial reporting structure which resulted in changes to allocation and presentation principles of certain costs. Comparatives for 2015 and
2014 have been recasted to reflect the new financial reporting structure. |
The notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
|
|
|
144 |
|
NOKIA ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 20-F 2016 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated statement of comprehensive income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2016 |
|
|
2015 |
|
|
2014 |
|
For the year ended December 31 |
|
Notes |
|
|
EURm |
|
|
EURm |
|
|
EURm |
|
(Loss)/profit for the year |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(927 |
) |
|
|
2 468 |
|
|
|
3 476 |
|
Other comprehensive income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Items that will not be reclassified to profit or loss: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Remeasurements on defined benefit plans |
|
|
|
|
|
|
613 |
|
|
|
112 |
|
|
|
(275 |
) |
Income tax related to items that will not be reclassified to profit or loss |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(269 |
) |
|
|
(28 |
) |
|
|
96 |
|
Items that may be reclassified subsequently to profit or loss: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Translation differences |
|
|
|
|
|
|
251 |
|
|
|
(1 054 |
) |
|
|
820 |
|
Net investment hedges |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(103 |
) |
|
|
322 |
|
|
|
(167 |
) |
Cash flow hedges |
|
|
|
|
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
|
(30 |
) |
Available-for-sale investments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(75 |
) |
|
|
113 |
|
|
|
106 |
|
Other (decrease)/increase, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6 |
) |
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
40 |
|
Income tax related to items that may be reclassified subsequently
to profit or loss |
|
|
|
|
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
(88 |
) |
|
|
16 |
|
Other comprehensive income/(loss), net of
tax |
|
|
22 |
|
|
|
445 |
|
|
|
(626 |
) |
|
|
606 |
|
Total comprehensive (loss)/income for
the year |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(482 |
) |
|
|
1 842 |
|
|
|
4 082 |
|
Attributable to: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity holders of the parent |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(277 |
) |
|
|
1 837 |
|
|
|
4 061 |
|
Non-controlling interests |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(205 |
) |
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
21 |
|
Total comprehensive (loss)/income for
the year |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(482 |
) |
|
|
1 842 |
|
|
|
4 082 |
|
Attributable to equity holders of the parent: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Continuing operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(262 |
) |
|
|
1 513 |
|
|
|
2 350 |
|
Discontinued operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(15 |
) |
|
|
324 |
|
|
|
1 711 |
|
Total attributable to equity holders of
the parent |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(277 |
) |
|
|
1 837 |
|
|
|
4 061 |
|
Attributable to non-controlling interests: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Continuing operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(205 |
) |
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
16 |
|
Discontinued operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
|
Total attributable to non-controlling
interests |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(205 |
) |
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
21 |
|
The notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
|
|
|
NOKIA ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 20-F 2016 |
|
145 |
Consolidated statement
of financial position
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2016 |
|
|
2015 |
|
As of December 31 |
|
Notes |
|
|
EURm |
|
|
EURm |
|
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-current assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intangible assets |
|
|
14, 16 |
|
|
|
10 960 |
|
|
|
560 |
|
Property, plant and equipment |
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
1 981 |
|
|
|
695 |
|
Investments in associated companies and joint ventures |
|
|
34 |
|
|
|
116 |
|
|
|
84 |
|
Available-for-sale investments |
|
|
24 |
|
|
|
1 040 |
|
|
|
1 004 |
|
Deferred tax assets |
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
5 701 |
|
|
|
2 634 |
|
Other non-current financial assets |
|
|
24, 36 |
|
|
|
254 |
|
|
|
49 |
|
Defined benefit pension assets |
|
|
27 |
|
|
|
3 802 |
|
|
|
25 |
|
Other non-current assets |
|
|
19 |
|
|
|
328 |
|
|
|
51 |
|
Total non-current
assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
24 182 |
|
|
|
5 102 |
|
Current assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inventories |
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
2 506 |
|
|
|
1 014 |
|
Accounts receivable, net of allowances for doubtful accounts |
|
|
18, 24, 36 |
|
|
|
6 972 |
|
|
|
3 913 |
|
Prepaid expenses and accrued income |
|
|
19 |
|
|
|
1 296 |
|
|
|
749 |
|
Current income tax assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
279 |
|
|
|
171 |
|
Other financial assets |
|
|
24, 25, 36 |
|
|
|
296 |
|
|
|
128 |
|
Investments at fair value through profit and loss, liquid assets |
|
|
24, 36 |
|
|
|
327 |
|
|
|
687 |
|
Available-for-sale investments, liquid assets |
|
|
24, 36 |
|
|
|
1 502 |
|
|
|
2 167 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
24, 36 |
|
|
|
7 497 |
|
|
|
6 995 |
|
Total current assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
20 675 |
|
|
|
15 824 |
|
Assets held for sale |
|
|
|
|
|
|
44 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
44 901 |
|
|
|
20 926 |
|
SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY AND LIABILITIES |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital and reserves attributable to equity holders of the
parent |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Share capital |
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
246 |
|
|
|
246 |
|
Share issue premium |
|
|
|
|
|
|
439 |
|
|
|
380 |
|
Treasury shares |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(881 |
) |
|
|
(718 |
) |
Translation differences |
|
|
21 |
|
|
|
483 |
|
|
|
292 |
|
Fair value and other reserves |
|
|
21 |
|
|
|
488 |
|
|
|
204 |
|
Reserve for invested non-restricted equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
15 731 |
|
|
|
3 820 |
|
Retained earnings |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 588 |
|
|
|
6 279 |
|
Total capital and reserves attributable to equity holders of the
parent |
|
|
|
|
|
|
20 094 |
|
|
|
10 503 |
|
Non-controlling interests |
|
|
|
|
|
|
881 |
|
|
|
21 |
|
Total equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
20 975 |
|
|
|
10 524 |
|
Non-current liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term interest-bearing liabilities |
|
|
23, 24, 36 |
|
|
|
3 657 |
|
|
|
2 023 |
|
Deferred tax liabilities |
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
403 |
|
|
|
61 |
|
Defined benefit pension and post-retirement liabilities |
|
|
27 |
|
|
|
5 000 |
|
|
|
423 |
|
Deferred revenue and other long-term liabilities |
|
|
24, 28 |
|
|
|
1 453 |
|
|
|
1 254 |
|
Provisions |
|
|
29 |
|
|
|
808 |
|
|
|
250 |
|
Total non-current
liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
11 321 |
|
|
|
4 011 |
|
Current liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Short-term interest-bearing liabilities |
|
|
23, 24, 36 |
|
|
|
370 |
|
|
|
51 |
|
Other financial liabilities |
|
|
24, 25, 36 |
|
|
|
236 |
|
|
|
114 |
|
Current income tax liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
634 |
|
|
|
446 |
|
Accounts payable |
|
|
24, 36 |
|
|
|
3 781 |
|
|
|
1 910 |
|
Accrued expenses, deferred revenue and other liabilities |
|
|
28 |
|
|
|
6 412 |
|
|
|
3 395 |
|
Provisions |
|
|
29 |
|
|
|
1 172 |
|
|
|
475 |
|
Total current
liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
12 605 |
|
|
|
6 391 |
|
Total liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
23 926 |
|
|
|
10 402 |
|
Total shareholders equity and
liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
44 901 |
|
|
|
20 926 |
|
The notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
|
|
|
146 |
|
NOKIA ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 20-F 2016 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated statement
of cash flows |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2016 |
|
|
2015 |
|
|
2014 |
|
For the year ended December 31 |
|
Notes |
|
|
EURm |
|
|
EURm |
|
|
EURm |
|
Cash flow from operating activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Loss)/profit for the year |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(927 |
) |
|
|
2 468 |
|
|
|
3 476 |
|
Adjustments, total |
|
|
31 |
|
|
|
2 407 |
|
|
|
(261 |
) |
|
|
(2 262 |
) |
Change in net working capital |
|
|
31 |
|
|
|
(2 207 |
) |
|
|
(1 377 |
) |
|
|
988 |
|
Cash (used in)/from operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(727 |
) |
|
|
830 |
|
|
|
2 202 |
|
Interest received |
|
|
|
|
|
|
85 |
|
|
|
62 |
|
|
|
45 |
|
Interest paid |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(309 |
) |
|
|
(99 |
) |
|
|
(336 |
) |
Income taxes paid, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(503 |
) |
|
|
(290 |
) |
|
|
(636 |
) |
Net cash (used in)/from operating
activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1 454 |
) |
|
|
503 |
|
|
|
1 275 |
|
Cash flow from investing activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acquisition of businesses, net of acquired cash |
|
|
|
|
|
|
5 819 |
|
|
|
(98 |
) |
|
|
(175 |
) |
Purchase of current available-for-sale investments, liquid assets(2) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4 131 |
) |
|
|
(3 133 |
) |
|
|
(2 977 |
) |
Purchase of investments at fair value through profit and loss, liquid assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(311 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Purchase of non-current available-for-sale investments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(73 |
) |
|
|
(88 |
) |
|
|
(73 |
) |
Proceeds from/(payment of) other long-term loans receivable |
|
|
|
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
7 |
|
Proceeds from/(payment of) short-term loans receivable |
|
|
|
|
|
|
19 |
|
|
|
(17 |
) |
|
|
20 |
|
Purchases of property, plant and equipment, and intangible assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(477 |
) |
|
|
(314 |
) |
|
|
(311 |
) |
Proceeds from disposal of businesses, net of disposed
cash(1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
2 586 |
|
|
|
2 508 |
|
Proceeds from disposal of shares in associated companies |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7 |
|
Proceeds from maturities and sale of current available-for-sale investments, liquid assets(2) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
5 121 |
|
|
|
3 074 |
|
|
|
1 774 |
|
Proceeds from maturities and sale of investments at fair value through profit and loss,liquid
assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
368 |
|
|
|
48 |
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from sale of non-current available-for-sale investments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
134 |
|
|
|
149 |
|
|
|
62 |
|
Proceeds from sale of property, plant and equipment and other intangible assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
28 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
44 |
|
Dividends received |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash from investing
activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
6 836 |
|
|
|
1 896 |
|
|
|
886 |
|
Cash flow from financing activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from stock option exercises |
|
|
|
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase of treasury shares |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(216 |
) |
|
|
(173 |
) |
|
|
(427 |
) |
Purchase of equity instruments of
subsidiaries(2) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(724 |
) |
|
|
(52 |
) |
|
|
(45 |
) |
Proceeds from long-term borrowings |
|
|
|
|
|
|
225 |
|
|
|
232 |
|
|
|
79 |
|
Repayment of long-term borrowings(2) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2 599 |
) |
|
|
(24 |
) |
|
|
(2 749 |
) |
Repayment of short-term borrowings |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(100 |
) |
|
|
(55 |
) |
|
|
(42 |
) |
Dividends paid and other contributions to shareholders |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1 515 |
) |
|
|
(512 |
) |
|
|
(1 392 |
) |
Net cash used in financing
activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4 923 |
) |
|
|
(580 |
) |
|
|
(4 576 |
) |
Translation differences |
|
|
|
|
|
|
43 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
(48 |
) |
Net increase/(decrease) in cash and
cash equivalents |
|
|
|
|
|
|
502 |
|
|
|
1 825 |
|
|
|
(2 463 |
) |
Cash and cash equivalents as of January 1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
6 995 |
|
|
|
5 170 |
|
|
|
7 633 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents as of
December 31 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
7 497 |
|
|
|
6 995 |
|
|
|
5 170 |
|
(1) |
In 2014, proceeds from the Sale of the D&S Business are presented net of the amount of principal and accrued interest on the repaid convertible bonds. |
(2) |
In 2016, Alcatel Lucent ordinary shares and ADSs and OCEANEs acquired in cash by Nokia subsequent to the closing of the reopened exchange offer are presented within cash flow from financing activities as purchase of
equity instruments of subsidiaries and repayment of long-term borrowings, respectively. In relation to the Public Buy-Out offer/Squeeze-Out, Nokias pledged cash asset of EUR 724 million to cover the purchase of the remaining Alcatel
Lucent securities was recorded within cash flow from investing activities as purchase of current available-for-sale investments, liquid assets. The amount of pledged cash released upon acquisition of Alcatel Lucent securities of EUR 724 million
was recorded within cash flow from investing activities as proceeds from maturities and sale of current available-for-sale investments, liquid assets. |
The consolidated statement of cash flows combines cash flows from both the Continuing and the Discontinued operations. Refer to Note 6, Disposals treated as Discontinued
operations.
The amounts in the consolidated statement of cash flows cannot be directly traced from the consolidated statement of financial position without
additional information on the acquisitions and disposals of subsidiaries and the net foreign exchange differences arising on consolidation.
The notes are an integral
part of these consolidated financial statements.
|
|
|
NOKIA ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 20-F 2016 |
|
147 |
Consolidated statement
of changes in shareholders equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reserve for |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
invested |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
of shares |
|
|
|
|
|
Share |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value |
|
|
non- |
|
|
|
|
|
Equity |
|
|
Non- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
outstanding |
|
|
Share |
|
|
issue |
|
|
Treasury |
|
|
Translation |
|
|
and other |
|
|
restricted |
|
|
Retained |
|
|
holders of |
|
|
controlling |
|
|
|
|
EURm |
|
Notes |
|
|
(000s) |
|
|
capital |
|
|
premium |
|
|
shares |
|
|
differences |
|
|
reserves |
|
|
equity |
|
|
earnings |
|
|
the parent |
|
|
interests |
|
|
Total |
|
As of January 1,
2014 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 712 427 |
|
|
|
246 |
|
|
|
615 |
|
|
|
(603 |
) |
|
|
434 |
|
|
|
80 |
|
|
|
3 115 |
|
|
|
2 581 |
|
|
|
6 468 |
|
|
|
192 |
|
|
|
6 660 |
|
Remeasurements of defined benefit plans, net of tax |
|
|
21 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(142 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(46 |
) |
|
|
(188 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(188 |
) |
Translation differences |
|
|
21 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
813 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
813 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
820 |
|
Net investment hedge losses, net of tax |
|
|
21 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(148 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(148 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(148 |
) |
Cash flow hedges, net of tax |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(30 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(30 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(30 |
) |
Available-for-sale investments, net of tax |
|
|
21 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
103 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
103 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
103 |
|
Other increase, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
39 |
|
|
|
49 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
49 |
|
Profit for the year |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 462 |
|
|
|
3 462 |
|
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
3 476 |
|
Total comprehensive income/(loss) for the
year |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
665 |
|
|
|
(59 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 455 |
|
|
|
4 061 |
|
|
|
21 |
|
|
|
4 082 |
|
Share-based payment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
|
Excess tax benefit on share-based payment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10 |
|
Settlement of performance and restricted shares |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 570 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(25 |
) |
|
|
47 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(32 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(10 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(10 |
) |
Acquisition of treasury shares |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(66 904 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(427 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(427 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(427 |
) |
Stock options exercise |
|
|
|
|
|
|
50 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends(1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1 374 |
) |
|
|
(1 374 |
) |
|
|
(9 |
) |
|
|
(1 383 |
) |
Disposal of subsidiaries |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(109 |
) |
|
|
(109 |
) |
Acquisition of non-controlling interests |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7 |
) |
|
|
(7 |
) |
|
|
(38 |
) |
|
|
(45 |
) |
Convertible bondequity component |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(114 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(114 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(114 |
) |
Other movements |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(51 |
) |
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
55 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
Total other equity
movements |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(176 |
) |
|
|
(385 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
(32 |
) |
|
|
(1 326 |
) |
|
|
(1 918 |
) |
|
|
(155 |
) |
|
|
(2 073 |
) |
As of December 31,
2014 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 648 143 |
|
|
|
246 |
|
|
|
439 |
|
|
|
(988 |
) |
|
|
1 099 |
|
|
|
22 |
|
|
|
3 083 |
|
|
|
4 710 |
|
|
|
8 611 |
|
|
|
58 |
|
|
|
8 669 |
|
Remeasurements of defined benefit plans, net of tax |
|
|
21 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
85 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7 |
) |
|
|
78 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
78 |
|
Translation differences |
|
|
21 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1 057 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1 057 |
) |
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
(1 053 |
) |
Net investment hedge gains, net of tax |
|
|
21 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
252 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
252 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
252 |
|
Cash flow hedges, net of tax |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4 |
) |
Available-for-sale investments, net of tax |
|
|
21 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
95 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
95 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
95 |
|
Other increase/(decrease), net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
6 |
|
Profit for the year |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 466 |
|
|
|
2 466 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
2 468 |
|
Total comprehensive income/ (loss) for the
year |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(805 |
) |
|
|
182 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 460 |
|
|
|
1 837 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
1 842 |
|
Share-based payment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
34 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
34 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
34 |
|
Excess tax benefit on share-based payment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2 |
) |
Settlement of performance and restricted shares |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 281 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(12 |
) |
|
|
24 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(16 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4 |
) |
Acquisition of treasury shares |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(24 516 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(174 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(174 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(174 |
) |
Cancellation of treasury shares |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
427 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(427 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock options exercise |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 042 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
|
Dividends(1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(507 |
) |
|
|
(507 |
) |
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
|
(512 |
) |
Acquisition of non-controlling interests |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(15 |
) |
|
|
(15 |
) |
|
|
(37 |
) |
|
|
(52 |
) |
Convertible bondequity component |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(57 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
57 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Convertible bondconversion to equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
313 681 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(30 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
750 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
720 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
720 |
|
Other movements |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(436 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
(7 |
) |
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
Total other equity
movements |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(59 |
) |
|
|
270 |
|
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
737 |
|
|
|
(891 |
) |
|
|
55 |
|
|
|
(42 |
) |
|
|
13 |
|
As of December 31,
2015 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 939 195 |
|
|
|
246 |
|
|
|
380 |
|
|
|
(718 |
) |
|
|
292 |
|
|
|
204 |
|
|
|
3 820 |
|
|
|
6 279 |
|
|
|
10 503 |
|
|
|
21 |
|
|
|
10 524 |
|
|
|
|
148 |
|
NOKIA ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 20-F 2016 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reserve for |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
invested |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
of shares |
|
|
|
|
|
Share |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value |
|
|
non- |
|
|
|
|
|
Equity |
|
|
Non- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
outstanding |
|
|
Share |
|
|
issue |
|
|
Treasury |
|
|
Translation |
|
|
and other |
|
|
restricted |
|
|
Retained |
|
|
holders of |
|
|
controlling |
|
|
|
|
EURm |
|
Notes |
|
|
(000s) |
|
|
capital |
|
|
premium |
|
|
shares |
|
|
differences |
|
|
reserves |
|
|
equity |
|
|
earnings |
|
|
the parent |
|
|
interests |
|
|
Total |
|
As of December 31,
2015 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 939 195 |
|
|
|
246 |
|
|
|
380 |
|
|
|
(718 |
) |
|
|
292 |
|
|
|
204 |
|
|
|
3 820 |
|
|
|
6 279 |
|
|
|
10 503 |
|
|
|
21 |
|
|
|
10 524 |
|
Remeasurements of defined benefit plans, net of tax |
|
|
21 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
348 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
348 |
|
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
344 |
|
Translation differences |
|
|
21 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
289 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
289 |
|
|
|
(38 |
) |
|
|
251 |
|
Net investment hedge losses, net of tax |
|
|
21 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(83 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(83 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(83 |
) |
Cash flow hedges, net of tax |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12 |
|
Available-for-sale investments, net of tax |
|
|
21 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(73 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(73 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(73 |
) |
Other decrease, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
(6 |
) |
Loss for the year |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(766 |
) |
|
|
(766 |
) |
|
|
(161 |
) |
|
|
(927 |
) |
Total comprehensive (loss)/income for the
year |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
206 |
|
|
|
286 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(769 |
) |
|
|
(277 |
) |
|
|
(205 |
) |
|
|
(482 |
) |
Share-based payment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
117 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
117 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
117 |
|
Excess tax benefit on share-based payment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6 |
) |
Settlement of performance and restricted shares |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 408 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(22 |
) |
|
|
68 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(52 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6 |
) |
Acquisition of treasury shares |
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
(54 296 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(231 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(231 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(231 |
) |
Stock options exercise |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 074 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6 |
|
Dividends(1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1 501 |
) |
|
|
(1 501 |
) |
|
|
(14 |
) |
|
|
(1 515 |
) |
Acquisitions through business combinations |
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
1 765 358 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11 616 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11 616 |
|
|
|
1 714 |
|
|
|
13 330 |
|
Equity issuance costs related to acquisitions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(16 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(16 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(16 |
) |
Acquisition of non-controlling interests |
|
|
|
|
|
|
65 778 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(15 |
) |
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
359 |
|
|
|
(459 |
) |
|
|
(117 |
) |
|
|
(635 |
) |
|
|
(752 |
) |
Vested portion of share-based payment awards related to acquisitions |
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6 |
|
Convertible bondequity component |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(38 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
38 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other movements |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(14 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other equity
movements |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
59 |
|
|
|
(163 |
) |
|
|
(15 |
) |
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
11 911 |
|
|
|
(1 922 |
) |
|
|
9 868 |
|
|
|
1 065 |
|
|
|
10 933 |
|
As of December 31,
2016 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
5 720 503 |
|
|
|
246 |
|
|
|
439 |
|
|
|
(881 |
) |
|
|
483 |
|
|
|
488 |
|
|
|
15 731 |
|
|
|
3 588 |
|
|
|
20 094 |
|
|
|
881 |
|
|
|
20 975 |
|
(1) |
Dividend declared is EUR 0.17 per share, subject to shareholders approval (dividend EUR 0.16 per share for 2015; special dividend EUR 0.10 per share for 2015; and dividend EUR 0.14 per share
for 2014). |
The notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
|
|
|
NOKIA ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 20-F 2016 |
|
149 |
Notes to consolidated financial statements
1. Corporate information
Nokia Oyj, a public limited liability company incorporated and domiciled in Helsinki, Finland, is the parent company (Parent Company or Parent)
for all its subsidiaries (Nokia or the Group). The Groups operational headquarters are located in Espoo, Finland. The Group is listed on the Nasdaq Helsinki stock exchange, the New York stock exchange and the
Euronext Paris stock exchange.
The Group is a leading global provider of mobile and fixed network infrastructure combining hardware, software and services, as well
as advanced technologies and licensing that connect people and things.
On March 23, 2017 the Board of Directors authorized the financial statements for 2016
for issuance and filing.
2. Significant accounting policies
Basis of presentation and statement of compliance
The consolidated
financial statements are prepared in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards as issued by the International Accounting Standards Board (IASB) and as adopted by the European Union (IFRS). The
consolidated financial statements are presented in millions of euros (EURm), except as otherwise noted, and are prepared under the historical cost convention, except as disclosed in the accounting policies below. The notes to
the consolidated financial statements also conform to the Finnish accounting legislation.
In 2016, comparative presentation of certain items in the
consolidated financial statements has been modified to conform with current year presentation.
Other information
This paragraph is included in connection with statutory reporting requirements in Germany. The fully consolidated German subsidiary, Nokia Solutions and Networks
GmbH & Co. KG, registered in the commercial register of Munich under HRA 88537, has made use of the exemption available under § 264b of the German Commercial Code (HGB).
Principles of consolidation
The consolidated financial statements comprise
the financial statements of the Parent Company, and each of those companies over which it exercises control. Control over an entity exists when the Group is exposed, or has rights, to variable returns from its involvement with the entity and has the
ability to affect those returns through its power over the entity. When the Group has less than a majority of voting or similar rights in an entity, the Group considers all relevant facts and circumstances in assessing whether it has power over an
entity, including the contractual arrangements, and voting rights and potential voting rights. The Group reassesses whether or not it controls an entity if facts and circumstances indicate that there are changes to the elements of control.
Consolidation of a subsidiary begins when the Group obtains control over the subsidiary and ceases when the Group loses control over the subsidiary. Assets,
liabilities, income and expenses of a subsidiary acquired or disposed of during the year are included in the consolidated financial statements from the date the Group gains control until the date the Group ceases to control the subsidiary.
A change in the ownership interest of a subsidiary, without a loss of control, is accounted for as an equity transaction. If the Group loses control in a subsidiary, the related assets, liabilities, non-controlling interest and other components
of equity are derecognized with any gain or loss recognized in the consolidated income statement. Any investment retained in the former subsidiary is measured at fair value.
All inter-company transactions are eliminated as part of the consolidation process. Non-controlling interests are presented
separately as a component of net profit and are shown as a component of shareholders equity in the consolidated
statement of financial position.
Business combinations
Business
combinations are accounted for using the acquisition method. The consideration transferred in a business combination is measured as the aggregate of the fair values of the assets transferred, liabilities incurred towards the former owners of the
acquired entity or business and equity instruments issued. Acquisition-related costs are recognized as expenses in the consolidated income statement in the period in which the costs are incurred and the related services are received with the
exception of costs directly attributable to the issuance of equity instruments that are accounted for as a deduction from equity.
Identifiable assets acquired and
liabilities assumed are measured at the acquisition date fair values. The Group elects whether to measure the non-controlling interests in the acquiree at fair value or at the proportionate share of the acquirees identifiable net assets on a
business combination by business combination basis. The excess of the aggregate of the consideration transferred and the amount recognized for non-controlling interests over the acquisition date fair values of the identifiable net assets
acquired is recorded as goodwill.
Investment in associates and joint ventures
An associate is an entity over which the Group exercises significant influence. Significant influence is the power to participate in the financial and operating policy
decisions of the entity, but is not control or joint control over those policies.
A joint venture is a type of joint arrangement whereby the parties that have
joint control of the arrangement have rights to the net assets of the arrangement. Joint control is the contractually agreed sharing of control of an arrangement, which exists only when decisions about relevant activities require the
unanimous consent of the parties sharing control.
The Groups investments in associates and joint ventures are accounted for using the equity method. Under
the equity method, the investment in an associate or joint venture is initially recognized at cost. The carrying amount of the investment is adjusted to recognize changes in the Groups share of net assets of the associate or joint venture
since the acquisition date. The Groups share of profits and losses of associates and joint ventures is included in the consolidated income statement outside operating profit or loss. Any change in other comprehensive income
(OCI) of associates and joint ventures is presented as part of the Groups OCI.
After application of the equity method, as of each
reporting date the Group determines whether there is objective evidence that the investment in an associate or joint venture is impaired. If there is such evidence, the Group recognizes an impairment loss that is calculated as the difference
between the recoverable amount of the associate or joint venture and its carrying value. The impairment loss is presented in Share of results of associated companies and joint ventures in the consolidated income statement.
Non-current assets held for sale (or disposal groups) and discontinued operations
Non-current assets or disposal groups are classified as assets held for sale if their carrying amounts will be recovered principally through a sale transaction
rather than through continuing use. For this to be the case, the asset, or the disposal group, must be available for immediate sale in its present condition subject only to terms that are usual and customary for sales of such assets or disposal
groups, and the sale must be highly probable. These assets, or in the case of disposal groups, assets and liabilities, are presented separately in the consolidated statement of financial position and measured at the lower of the carrying amount
and fair value less costs to sell.
|
|
|
150 |
|
NOKIA ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 20-F 2016 |
Non-current assets classified as held for sale, or included in a disposal group classified as held for sale, are not
depreciated or amortized.
Discontinued operations are reported when a component of the Group, comprising operations and cash flows that can be clearly
distinguished both operationally and for financial reporting purposes from the rest of the Group, is classified as held for sale or has been disposed of, or the component represents a major line of business or geographical area of operations, or is
a part of a single coordinated plan to dispose of a separate major line of business or geographical area of operations. Profit or loss from Discontinued operations is reported separately from income and expenses from Continuing operations in the
consolidated income statement, with prior periods presented on a comparative basis. Cash flows for Discontinued operations are presented separately in the notes to the consolidated financial statements. Intra-group revenues and expenses between
Continuing and Discontinued operations are eliminated.
Revenue recognition
Revenue is recognized when the following criteria for the transaction have been met: significant risks and rewards of ownership have transferred to the buyer;
continuing managerial involvement and effective control usually associated with ownership have ceased; the amount of revenue can be measured reliably; it is probable that the economic benefits associated with the transaction will flow to the Group;
and the costs incurred or to be incurred in respect of the transaction can be measured reliably. Revenue is measured at the fair value of the consideration received or receivable net of discounts and excluding taxes and duties.
Recurring service revenue which includes managed services and maintenance services is generally recognized on a straight-line basis over the agreed period, unless there
is evidence that some other method better represents the rendering of services.
The Group enters into contracts consisting of any combination of hardware, services
and software. Within these multiple element arrangements, separate components are identified and accounted for based on the nature of those components, considering the economic substance of the entire arrangement. Revenue is allocated to each
separately identifiable component based on the relative fair value of each component. The fair value of each component is determined by taking into consideration factors such as the price of the component when sold separately and the component cost
plus a reasonable margin when price references are not available. The revenue allocated to each component is recognized when the revenue recognition criteria for that component have been met.
Revenue from contracts involving the construction of an asset according to customer specifications is recognized using the percentage of completion method. Stage of
completion for each contract is measured by either the achievement of contractually defined milestones or costs incurred compared to total project costs.
Revenue on license fees is recognized in accordance with the substance of the relevant agreements. Subsequent to the initial licensing transaction, where the Group has
no remaining obligations to perform and licensing fees are non-refundable, revenue is recognized after the customer has been provided access to the underlying asset. Where the Group retains obligations related to the licensed asset after the initial
licensing transaction, revenue is typically recognized over a period of time during which remaining performance obligations are satisfied. In some multiple element licensing transactions, the Group applies the residual method in the absence of
reference information.
Net sales includes revenue from all licensing negotiations, litigations and arbitrations to the extent that the criteria for revenue
recognition have been met.
Government grants
Government
grants are recognized when there is reasonable assurance that the Group will comply with the conditions attached to them and the grants will be received. Government grants received as compensation for expenses or losses incurred are recognized in
the consolidated income statement as a deduction against the related expenses. Government grants related to assets are presented in the consolidated statement of financial position as deferred income and recognized as income over the same period the
asset is depreciated or amortized.
Government grants received in the form of R&D tax credits are recognized as a deduction against R&D expenses if the
amount of the tax credit is linked to the amount of R&D expenditures incurred by the Group and the tax credit is a fully collectible asset which will be paid in cash by the government in case the Group is not able to offset it against its
income tax payable. R&D tax credits that do not meet both conditions are recognized as income tax benefit.
Employee benefits
Pensions and other post-employment benefits
The Group companies have various post-employment plans in accordance with the local conditions and practices in the countries in which they operate. The plans are
generally funded through payments to insurance companies or contributions to trustee-administered funds as determined by periodic actuarial calculations.
In a
defined contribution plan, the Groups legal or constructive obligation is limited to the amount that it agrees to contribute to the fund. The Groups contributions to defined contribution plans, multi-employer and insured plans are
recognized in the consolidated income statement in the period to which the contributions relate. If a pension plan is funded through an insurance contract where the Group does not retain any legal or constructive obligations, the plan
is treated as a defined contribution plan. All arrangements that do not fulfill these conditions are considered defined benefit plans.
For defined
benefit plans, including pension and post-retirement healthcare and life insurance, costs are assessed using the projected unit credit method: the cost is recognized in the consolidated income statement so as to spread the benefit over the service
lives of employees. The defined benefit obligation is measured as the present value of the estimated future cash outflows using interest rates on high-quality corporate bonds or government bonds with appropriate maturities. Actuarial gains and
losses arising from experience adjustments and changes in actuarial assumptions are charged or credited to equity in other comprehensive income in the period in which they arise. Past service costs and settlement gains and losses are recognized
immediately in the consolidated income statement as part of service cost, when the plan amendment, curtailment or settlement occurs. Curtailment gains and losses are accounted for as past service costs.
The liability or asset recognized in the consolidated statement of financial position is the defined benefit obligation as of the closing date less the fair value of plan
assets including effects relating to any asset ceiling.
Remeasurements, comprising actuarial gains and losses, the effect of the asset ceiling and the
return on plan assets, excluding amounts recognized in net interest, are recognized immediately in the consolidated statement of financial position with a corresponding debit or credit to Fair Value and Other Reserves in Equity through
the consolidated statement of other comprehensive income in the period in which they occur. Remeasurements are not reclassified to the consolidated income statement in subsequent periods.
Actuarial valuations for the Groups defined benefit post-employment plans are performed annually or when a material curtailment or settlement of a defined benefit
plan occurs.
|
|
|
NOKIA ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 20-F 2016 |
|
151 |
Notes to consolidated financial statements continued
Termination benefits
Termination benefits are payable when employment is terminated before the normal retirement date, or whenever an employee accepts voluntary redundancy in exchange for
these benefits. The Group recognizes termination benefits when it is demonstrably committed to either terminating the employment of current employees according to a detailed formal plan without possibility of withdrawal, or providing
termination benefits as a result of an offer made to encourage voluntary redundancy. Local laws may provide employees with the right to benefits from the employer upon termination whether the termination is voluntary or involuntary. For these
specific termination benefits, the portion of the benefit that the Group would be required to pay to the employee in the case of voluntary termination is treated as a constructive obligation determined by local law and accounted for as a
defined benefit arrangement as described in the pensions section above.
Share-based payment
The Group offers three types of global equity-settled share-based compensation plans for employees: stock options, performance shares and restricted shares.
Employee services received and the corresponding increase in equity are measured by reference to the fair value of the equity instruments as of the grant date,
excluding the impact of any non-market vesting conditions. Non-market vesting conditions attached to the performance shares are included in assumptions about the number of shares that the employee will ultimately receive. The Group reviews
the assumptions made on a regular basis and, where necessary, revises its estimates of the number of performance shares that are expected to be settled. Plans that apply tranched vesting are accounted for under the graded vesting model.
Share-based compensation is recognized as an expense in the consolidated income statement over the relevant service periods.
The Group has issued certain
stock options which are accounted for as cash-settled. The related employee services received and the liabilities incurred are measured at the fair value of the liability. The fair value of stock options is estimated based on the reporting date
market value less the exercise price of the stock options. The fair value of the liability is remeasured as of each reporting date and as of the date of settlement, with changes in fair value recognized in the consolidated income statement over
the relevant service periods.
Income taxes
The income tax expense
comprises current tax and deferred tax. Tax is recognized in the consolidated income statement except to the extent that it relates to items recognized in other comprehensive income, or directly in equity; then the related tax is
recognized in other comprehensive income or equity, respectively.
Current taxes are based on the results of group companies and are calculated using the local
tax laws and tax rates that are enacted or substantively enacted as of each reporting date. Corporate taxes withheld at the source of the income on behalf of group companies, both recoverable and irrecoverable, as well as penalties and
interests on income taxes are accounted for in income taxes.
The Group periodically evaluates positions taken in tax returns with respect to situations in which
applicable tax regulation is subject to interpretation. It adjusts the amounts recorded, where appropriate, on the basis of amounts expected to be paid to the tax authorities. The amount of current income tax liabilities for uncertain income
tax positions is recognized when it is more likely than not that certain tax positions may not be fully sustained upon review by tax authorities. The amounts recorded are based upon the estimated future settlement amount as of each reporting date.
Deferred tax assets and liabilities are determined using the liability method for all temporary differences arising
between the tax bases of assets and liabilities and their carrying amounts in the consolidated financial statements. Deferred tax assets are recognized to the extent that it is probable that future taxable profit will be available against which
the unused tax losses, unused tax credits or deductible temporary differences can be utilized before the unused tax losses or unused tax credits expire. Deferred tax assets are assessed for realizability as of each reporting date. When
circumstances indicate it is no longer probable that deferred tax assets will be utilized, adjustments are made as necessary. Deferred tax liabilities are recognized for temporary differences that arise between the fair value and the
tax base of identifiable net assets acquired in business combinations.
Deferred tax assets and deferred tax liabilities are offset for presentation purposes when
there is a legally enforceable right to set off current tax assets against current tax liabilities, and the deferred tax assets and deferred tax liabilities relate to income taxes levied by the same taxation authority on either the same taxable
entity or different taxable entities which intend either to settle current tax liabilities and assets on a net basis, or to realize the assets and settle the liabilities simultaneously in each future period in which significant amounts of deferred
tax liabilities or deferred tax assets are expected to be settled or recovered.
Deferred tax liabilities are not recognized if they arise from the initial
recognition of goodwill. Deferred tax liabilities are provided on taxable temporary differences arising from investments in subsidiaries, associates and joint arrangements, except for deferred tax liability where the timing of the reversal of the
temporary difference is controlled by the Group, and it is probable that the temporary difference will not reverse in the foreseeable future.
The enacted or
substantively enacted tax rates as of each reporting date that are expected to apply in the period when the asset is realized or the liability is settled are used in the measurement of deferred tax assets and deferred tax liabilities. Deferred tax
assets and liabilities are not discounted.
Foreign currency translation
Functional and presentation currency
The
financial statements of all group companies are measured using functional currency, which is the currency of the primary economic environment in which the entity operates. The consolidated financial statements are presented in euro, the functional
and presentation currency of the Parent Company.
Transactions in foreign currencies
Transactions in foreign currencies are recorded at exchange rates prevailing as of the dates of the individual transactions. For practical reasons, a rate that
approximates the actual rate as of the date of the transaction is often used. At the end of the reporting period, monetary assets and liabilities denominated in foreign currency are valued at the exchange rates prevailing at the end of the reporting
period. Foreign exchange gains and losses arising from monetary assets and liabilities as well as fair value changes of related hedging instruments are recognized in financial income and expenses. Unrealized foreign exchange gains and losses related
to non-current available-for-sale investments are included in the fair value measurement of these investments and recognized in other comprehensive income.
Foreign group companies
All income and expenses of foreign group companies where the functional currency is not the euro are
translated into euro at the average foreign exchange rates for the reporting period. All assets and liabilities of foreign group companies are translated into euro at foreign exchange rates prevailing at the end of the reporting period.
|
|
|
152 |
|
NOKIA ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 20-F 2016 |
Differences resulting from the translation of income and expenses at the average rate and assets and liabilities at
the closing rate are recognized as translation differences in consolidated statement of comprehensive income. On the disposal of all or part of a foreign group company through sale, liquidation, repayment of share capital or abandonment, the
cumulative amount or proportionate share of translation differences is recognized as income or expense when the gain or loss on disposal is recognized.
Intangible assets
Intangible assets acquired separately are measured on
initial recognition at cost. The cost of intangible assets acquired in a business combination is their fair value as of the date of acquisition. Internally generated intangibles, except for development costs that may be capitalized, are
expensed as incurred. Development costs are capitalized only if the Group has the technical feasibility to complete the asset; has an ability and intention to use or sell the asset; can demonstrate that the asset will generate future economic
benefits; has resources available to complete the asset; and has the ability to measure reliably the expenditure during development.
Following initial
recognition, intangible assets are carried at cost less accumulated amortization and accumulated impairment losses. Intangible assets are amortized over their useful lives, generally three to ten years, using the straight-line method which is
considered reflecting best the pattern in which the assets future economic benefits are expected to be consumed. The amortization charges are presented within cost of sales, research and development expenses and selling, general and
administrative expenses in the consolidated income statement.
Property, plant and equipment
Property, plant and equipment are stated at cost less accumulated depreciation and accumulated impairment losses. Depreciation is recorded on a straight-line basis over
the expected useful lives of the assets as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Buildings and constructions |
|
|
|
|
Buildings and constructions |
|
|
2033 years |
|
Light buildings and constructions |
|
|
3-20 years |
|
Machinery and equipment |
|
|
|
|
Production machinery, measuring and test equipment |
|
|
1-5 years |
|
Other machinery and equipment |
|
|
3-10 years |
|
Land and water areas are not depreciated.
Maintenance, repairs and renewals are generally expensed in the period in which they are incurred. However, major renovations are capitalized and included in the
carrying amount of the asset when it is probable that future economic benefits in excess of the originally assessed standard of performance of the existing asset will flow to the Group. Major renovations are depreciated over the remaining
useful life of the related asset. Leasehold improvements are depreciated over the shorter of the lease term and the useful life. Gains and losses on the disposal of property, plant and equipment are included in operating profit or loss.
Leases
Leases are classified as finance leases whenever the terms of the
lease transfer substantially all the risks and rewards incidental to ownership to the lessee. All other leases are classified as operating leases.
The Group has
entered into various operating lease contracts as a lessee. The related payments are treated as rental expenses and recognized in the consolidated income statement on a straight-line basis over the lease terms unless another systematic approach
is more representative of the pattern of the benefit.
The Group does not have any significant finance lease arrangements.
Impairment of goodwill, other intangible assets and property, plant and equipment
The Group assesses the recoverability of the carrying value of goodwill, other intangible assets and property, plant and equipment if events or changes in
circumstances indicate that the carrying value may be impaired. In addition, the Group tests the carrying value of goodwill for impairment annually even if there is no indication of impairment.
Factors that the Group considers when it reviews indications of impairment include, but are not limited to, underperformance of the asset relative to its historical or
projected future results, significant changes in the manner of using the asset or the strategy for the overall business, and significant negative industry or economic trends.
For impairment testing purposes, goodwill is allocated to the cash-generating units or groups of cash-generating units expected to benefit from the synergies of
the business combination. A cash-generating unit, as determined for the purposes of the Groups goodwill impairment testing, is the smallest group of assets, including goodwill, generating cash inflows that are largely independent of the
cash inflows from other assets or groups of assets. The carrying value of a cash-generating unit includes its share of relevant corporate assets allocated to it on a reasonable and consistent basis.
The Group conducts its impairment testing by determining the recoverable amount for an asset or a cash-generating unit. The recoverable amount of an asset or a
cash-generating unit is the higher of its fair value less costs of disposal and its value-in-use. The recoverable amount is compared to the assets or cash-generating units carrying value. If the recoverable amount for the asset or
cash-generating unit is less than its carrying value, the asset is considered impaired and is written down to its recoverable amount. Impairment losses are presented in other expenses, or as a separate line item if significant, in the consolidated
income statement.
For more information on the annual impairment testing of goodwill, including key assumptions used in calculating the recoverable amount of
goodwill, refer to Note 16, Impairment.
Inventories
Inventories are
stated at the lower of cost and net realizable value. Cost is determined using standard cost, which approximates actual cost on a first-in first-out (FIFO) basis. Net realizable value is the amount that can be realized from the sale of
the inventory in the normal course of business after allowing for the costs of realization. In addition to the cost of materials and direct labor, an appropriate proportion of production overhead is included in the inventory values. An allowance is
recorded for excess inventory and obsolescence based on the lower of cost and net realizable value.
Fair value measurement
A number of financial instruments are measured at fair value as of each reporting date after initial recognition. Fair value is the price that would be received to
sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. The fair value of an asset or a liability is measured using the assumptions that market participants would use when pricing
the asset or liability, assuming that market participants act in their economic best interest by using quoted market rates, discounted cash flow analyses and other appropriate valuation models. The Group uses valuation techniques that are
appropriate in the circumstances and for which sufficient data is available to measure fair value, maximizing the use of relevant observable inputs and minimizing the use of unobservable inputs. All assets and liabilities for which fair values
are being measured or disclosed in the consolidated financial statements are categorized within the fair value hierarchy, described as follows, based on the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement as a whole:
|
|
|
NOKIA ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 20-F 2016 |
|
153 |
Notes to consolidated financial statements continued
Level 1Quoted (unadjusted) market prices for exchange-traded products in active markets for identical assets or
liabilities;
Level 2Valuation techniques for which significant inputs other than quoted prices are directly or indirectly observable; and
Level 3Valuation techniques for which significant inputs are unobservable.
The Group categorizes assets and liabilities that are measured at fair value on a recurring basis into an appropriate level of the fair value hierarchy at the end of
each reporting period.
Financial assets
The Group has classified its
financial assets in the following categories: available-for-sale investments, derivative and other current financial assets, loans receivable, accounts receivable, financial assets at fair value through profit or loss, and cash and cash equivalents.
Derivatives are described in the section on derivative financial instruments.
Available-for-sale investments
The Group invests a portion of the cash needed to cover the projected cash outflows of its ongoing business operations in highly liquid, interest-bearing investments
and certain equity instruments. The following investments are classified as available-for-sale based on the purpose of the investment and the Groups ongoing intentions:
∎ |
|
Available-for-sale investments, liquid assets consist of highly liquid, fixed-income and money-market investments with maturities at acquisition of more than three months, as well as bank deposits with maturities
or contractual call periods at acquisition of more than three months. |
∎ |
|
Investments in technology-related publicly quoted equity shares or unlisted private equity shares and unlisted venture funds, classified in the consolidated statement of financial position as non-current
available-for-sale investments. |
Current fixed-income and money-market investments are fair valued by using quoted market rates, discounted cash flow
analyses and other appropriate valuation models as of the reporting date. Investments in publicly quoted equity shares are measured at fair value using exchange quoted bid prices. Other available-for-sale investments carried at fair value
include holdings in unlisted shares. Fair value is estimated using a number of methods, including, but not limited to: the current market value of similar instruments; prices established from a recent arms-length financing transaction of
target companies; and analysis of market prospects and operating performance of target companies, taking into consideration public market comparable companies in similar industry sectors. The Group uses judgment in selecting the appropriate
valuation methodology as well as underlying assumptions based on existing market practice and conditions. Changes in these assumptions may cause the Group to recognize impairments or losses in future periods.
The remaining available-for-sale investments are carried at cost less impairment. These are technology-related investments in private equity shares and unlisted venture
funds for which fair value cannot be measured reliably due to non-existent public markets or reliable valuation methods.
All purchases and sales of
investments are recorded on the trade date, that is, when the Group commits to purchase or sell the asset.
Changes in the fair value of available-for-sale
investments are recognized in fair value and other reserves as part of other comprehensive income, with the exception of interest calculated using the effective interest method and foreign exchange gains and losses on current available-for-sale
investments recognized directly in the consolidated income statement. Dividends on available-for-sale equity instruments are recognized in the consolidated income statement
when the Groups right to receive payment is established. When the investment is disposed of, the related
accumulated fair value changes are released from other comprehensive income and recognized in the consolidated income statement. The weighted average method is used to determine the cost basis of publicly listed equities being disposed of. The FIFO
method is used to determine the cost basis of fixed-income securities being disposed of. An impairment charge is recorded if the carrying amount of an available-for-sale investment is greater than the estimated fair value and there is objective
evidence that the asset is impaired including, but not limited to, counterparty default and other factors causing a reduction in value that can be considered other than temporary. The cumulative net loss relating to the investment
is removed from equity and recognized in the consolidated income statement for the period. If, in a subsequent period, the fair value of the investment in a non-equity instrument increases and the increase can be objectively related to an event
occurring after the loss was recognized, the loss is reversed and the reversal is recognized in the consolidated income statement.
Investments at fair value through profit and loss, liquid assets
Certain highly liquid financial assets are designated at inception as investments at fair value through profit and loss, liquid assets. These investments must meet
one of the following two criteria: the designation eliminates or significantly reduces an inconsistent treatment that would otherwise arise from measuring the assets or recognizing gains or losses on a different basis; or the assets are
part of a group of financial assets, which are managed and their performance evaluated on a fair value basis in accordance with a documented risk management or investment strategy. These investments are initially recognized and subsequently
remeasured at fair value. Fair value adjustments and realized gains and losses are recognized in the consolidated income statement.
Loans receivable
Loans receivable include
loans to customers and suppliers and are measured initially at fair value and subsequently at amortized cost less impairment using the effective interest method. Loans are subject to regular review as to their collectability and available
collateral. A valuation allowance is made if a loan is deemed not to be fully recoverable. The related cost is recognized in other expenses or financial expenses, depending on the nature of the receivable to reflect the shortfall between
the carrying amount and the present value of expected future cash flows. Interest income on loans receivable is recognized in financial income and expenses in the consolidated income statement by applying the effective interest rate.
Cash and cash equivalents
Cash and cash
equivalents consist of cash at bank and in hand and available-for-sale investments, cash equivalents. Available-for-sale investments, cash equivalents consist of highly liquid, fixed-income and money-market investments that are readily convertible
to known amounts of cash with maturities at acquisition of three months or less, as well as bank deposits with maturities or contractual call periods at acquisition of three months or less. Due to the high credit quality and short-term nature of
these investments, there is an insignificant risk of change in value. Investments in money-market funds that have a risk profile consistent with the aforementioned criteria are also classified as cash equivalents.
Accounts receivable
Accounts receivable
include amounts invoiced to customers, amounts where revenue recognition criteria have been fulfilled but the customers have not yet been invoiced, and amounts where the contractual rights to the cash flows have been confirmed but the customers have
not yet been invoiced. Billed accounts receivable are carried at the amount invoiced to customers less allowances for doubtful accounts. Allowances for doubtful accounts are based on a periodic review of all outstanding amounts, including an
analysis of
|
|
|
154 |
|
NOKIA ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 20-F 2016 |
historical bad debt, customer concentrations, customer creditworthiness, past due amounts, current economic trends
and changes in customer payment terms. Impairment charges on receivables identified as uncollectible are included in other operating expenses in the consolidated income statement.
Financial liabilities
The Group has classified its financial liabilities into
the following categories: derivative and other current financial liabilities, compound financial instruments, loans payable, and accounts payable. Derivatives are described in the section on derivative financial instruments.
Compound financial instruments
Compound
financial instruments have both a financial liability and an equity component from the issuers perspective. The components are defined based on the terms of the financial instrument and presented and measured separately according to their
substance. The financial liability component is initially recognized at fair value, the residual being allocated to the equity component. The allocation remains the same for the life of the compound financial instrument. The financial liability
components of convertible bonds issued by the Group are accounted for as loan payables.
Loans payable
Loans payable are recognized initially at fair value net of transaction costs. In subsequent periods, loans payable are presented at amortized cost using the effective
interest method. Transaction costs and loan interest are recognized in the consolidated income statement as financial expenses over the life of the instrument.
Accounts payable
Accounts payable are carried at invoiced amount which is considered to be the fair value due to the short-term
nature of the Groups accounts payable.
Derivative financial instruments
All derivatives are recognized initially at fair value on the date a derivative contract is entered into and subsequently remeasured at fair value. The method of
recognizing the resulting gain or loss varies according to whether the derivatives are designated and qualify under hedge accounting. Generally, the cash flows of a hedge are classified as cash flows from operating activities in the consolidated
statement of cash flows as the underlying hedged items relate to the Groups operating activities. When a derivative contract is accounted for as a hedge of an identifiable position relating to financing or investing activities, the cash
flows of the contract are classified in the same way as the cash flows of the position being hedged.
Derivatives not designated in
hedge accounting relationships carried at fair value through profit and loss
Forward foreign exchange contracts are valued at market-forward exchange
rates. Changes in fair value are measured by comparing these rates with the original contract-forward rate. Currency options are valued as of each reporting date by using the Garman & Kohlhagen option valuation model. Changes in fair value
are recognized in the consolidated income statement.
Fair values of forward rate agreements, interest rate options, futures contracts and exchange-traded options
are calculated based on quoted market rates as of each reporting date. Discounted cash flow analyses are used to value interest rate and cross-currency interest rate swaps. Changes in fair value are recognized in the consolidated income statement.
For derivatives not designated under hedge accounting but hedging identifiable exposures such as anticipated foreign currency denominated sales and purchases,
the gains and losses are recognized in other income or expenses. The gains and losses on all other derivatives not designated under hedge accounting are recognized in financial income and expenses in the consolidated income statement.
Embedded derivatives, if any, are identified and monitored by the Group and measured at fair value as of each reporting
date with changes in fair value recognized in the consolidated income statement.
Hedge accounting
The Group applies hedge accounting on certain forward foreign exchange contracts, options or option strategies, and interest rate derivatives. Qualifying options and
option strategies have zero net premium or a net premium paid. For option structures, the critical terms of the bought and sold options are the same and the nominal amount of the sold option component is not greater than that of the bought
option.
Cash flow hedges: hedging of forecast foreign currency denominated sales and purchases
The Group applies hedge accounting for qualifying hedges. Qualifying hedges are those properly documented cash flow hedges of foreign exchange rate risk of future
forecast foreign currency denominated sales and purchases that meet the requirements set out in IAS 39, Financial Instruments: Recognition and Measurement. The hedged item must be highly probable and present an exposure to variations in cash
flows that could ultimately affect profit or loss. The hedge must be highly effective, both prospectively and retrospectively.
For qualifying foreign exchange
forwards, the change in fair value that reflects the change in spot exchange rates and, for qualifying foreign exchange options or option strategies, the change in intrinsic value are deferred in fair value and other reserves in shareholders
equity to the extent that the hedge is effective. The ineffective portion is recognized immediately in the consolidated income statement. Hedging costs, expressed either as the change in fair value that reflects the change in forward
exchange rates less the change in spot exchange rates for forward foreign exchange contracts, or as changes in the time value for options or options strategies, are recognized in other income or expenses in the consolidated income
statement.
Accumulated changes in fair value from qualifying hedges are released from fair value and other reserves into the consolidated income statement as
adjustments to sales and cost of sales when the hedged cash flow affects the consolidated income statement. Forecast foreign currency sales and purchases affect the consolidated income statement at various dates up to approximately one year
from the reporting date. If the forecasted transaction is no longer expected to take place, all deferred gains or losses are released immediately into the consolidated income statement. If the hedged item ceases to be highly probable but is still
expected to take place, accumulated gains and losses remain in fair value and other reserves until the hedged cash flow affects the consolidated income statement.
Cash flow hedges: hedging of foreign currency risk of highly probable business acquisitions and other transactions
From time to
time, the Group hedges cash flow variability caused by foreign currency risk inherent in highly probable business acquisitions and other future transactions that result in the recognition of non-financial assets. When those non-financial assets
are recognized in the consolidated statement of financial position, the gains and losses previously deferred in fair value and other reserves are transferred to the initial acquisition cost of the asset. The deferred amounts are ultimately
recognized in the consolidated income statement as a result of goodwill assessments for business acquisitions and through depreciation or amortization for other assets. The application of hedge accounting is conditional on the forecast transaction
being highly probable and the hedge being highly effective, prospectively and retrospectively.
|
|
|
NOKIA ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 20-F 2016 |
|
155 |
Notes to consolidated financial statements continued
Cash flow hedges: hedging of cash flow variability
on variable rate liabilities
From time to
time, the Group applies cash flow hedge accounting for hedging cash flow variability on certain variable rate liabilities. The effective portion of the gain or loss relating to interest rate swaps hedging variable rate borrowings is
deferred in fair value and other reserves. The gain or loss related to the ineffective portion is recognized immediately in the consolidated income statement. If hedging instruments are settled before the maturity date of the related
liability, hedge accounting is discontinued and all cumulative gains and losses recycled gradually to the consolidated income statement when the hedged variable interest cash flows affect the consolidated income statement.
Fair value hedges: hedging of foreign exchange exposure
The Group applies fair value hedge accounting for foreign exchange risk with the objective to reduce the exposure to fluctuations in the fair value of firm commitments
due to changes in foreign exchange rates. Changes in the fair value of derivatives designated and qualifying as fair value hedges, together with any changes in the fair value of the hedged firm commitments attributable to the hedged risk, are
recorded in financial income and expenses in the consolidated income statement.
Fair value hedges: hedging of interest rate exposure
The Group applies fair value hedge accounting to reduce exposure to fair value fluctuations of interest-bearing liabilities due to changes in interest
rates and foreign exchange rates. Changes in the fair value of derivatives designated and qualifying as fair value hedges, together with any changes in the fair value of hedged liabilities attributable to the hedged risk, are recognized in financial
income and expenses. If the hedged item no longer meets the criteria for hedge accounting, hedge accounting ceases and any fair value adjustments made to the carrying amount of the hedged item while the hedge was effective are recognized in
financial income and expenses based on the effective interest method.
Hedges of net investments in foreign operations
The Group applies hedge accounting for its foreign currency hedging on net investments. Qualifying hedges are those properly documented hedges of foreign exchange
rate risk of foreign currency denominated net investments that are effective both prospectively and retrospectively.
The change in fair value that reflects the
change in spot exchange rates for qualifying foreign exchange forwards, and the change in intrinsic value for qualifying foreign exchange options, are deferred in translation differences in the consolidated statement of shareholders equity.
The change in fair value that reflects the change in forward exchange rates less the change in spot exchange rates for forwards, and changes in time value for options are recognized in financial income and expenses. If a foreign currency denominated
loan is used as a hedge, all foreign exchange gains and losses arising from the transaction are recognized in translation differences. The ineffective portion is recognized immediately in the consolidated income statement.
Accumulated changes in fair value from qualifying hedges are released from translation differences on the disposal of all or part of a foreign Group company by sale,
liquidation, repayment of share capital or abandonment. The cumulative amount or proportionate share of changes in the fair value of qualifying hedges deferred in translation differences is recognized as income or expense when the gain or loss on
disposal is recognized.
Provisions
Provisions are
recognized when the Group has a present legal or constructive obligation as a result of past events, it is probable that an outflow of resources will be required to settle the obligation and a reliable estimate of the amount can be made. When
the Group expects a provision to be reimbursed, the reimbursement is recognized as an asset only when the reimbursement is virtually certain. The Group assesses the adequacy of its existing provisions and adjusts the amounts as necessary based on
actual experience and changes in facts and circumstances as of each reporting date.
Restructuring provisions
The Group provides for the estimated cost to restructure when a detailed formal plan of restructuring has been completed, approved by management, and announced.
Restructuring costs consist primarily of personnel restructuring charges. The other main components are costs associated with exiting real estate locations, and costs of terminating certain other contracts directly linked to the
restructuring.
Warranty provisions
The
Group provides for the estimated liability to repair or replace products under standard warranty at the time revenue is recognized. The provision is an estimate based on historical experience of the level of repairs and replacements.
Litigation provisions
The Group provides for
the estimated future settlements related to litigation based on the probable outcome of potential claims.
Environmental provisions
The Group provides for estimated costs of environmental remediation relating to soil, groundwater, surface water and sediment contamination
when the Group becomes obliged, legally or constructively, to rectify the environmental damage, or to perform restorative work.
Project loss provisions
The Group provides for
onerous contracts based on the lower of the expected cost of fulfilling the contract and the expected cost of terminating the contract. An onerous contract is a contract in which the unavoidable costs of meeting the obligations under the
contract exceed the economic benefits expected to be received under it.
Divestment-related provisions
The Group provides for indemnifications it is required to make to the buyers of its disposed businesses.
Material liability provisions
The Group
recognizes the estimated liability for non-cancellable purchase commitments for inventory in excess of forecasted requirements at each reporting date.
Other provisions
The Group provides for other legal and constructive obligations based on the expected cost of executing any such
commitments.
Treasury shares
The Group recognizes its own equity
instruments that are acquired (treasury shares) as a reduction of equity at cost of acquisition. When cancelled, the acquisition cost of treasury shares is recognized in retained earnings.
Dividends
Dividends proposed by the Board of Directors are recognized in the
consolidated financial statements when they have been approved by the shareholders at the Annual General Meeting.
|
|
|
156 |
|
NOKIA ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 20-F 2016 |
New and amended standards and interpretations adopted
On January 1, 2016, the Group adopted amendments to multiple IFRS standards, which resulted from the amendments to IAS 1 and the IASBs annual
improvement project for the 2012-2014 cycles. They comprise amendments that result in accounting changes for presentation, recognition or measurement purposes, most visibly through additional guidance on use of judgment in applying
materiality in aggregation and disaggregation of line items and more generally in the presentation in the financial statements. The amendments did not have a material impact on the Groups consolidated financial statements.
Standards issued but not yet effective
The Group will adopt the following new
and revised standards, amendments and interpretations to existing standards issued by the IASB that are expected to be relevant to its operations and financial position when they become effective and are endorsed by the EU. Other revisions,
amendments and interpretations to existing standards issued by the IASB that are not yet effective, except what has been described below, are not expected to have a material impact on the consolidated financial statements of the Group when
adopted.
The Group has not early adopted any standard, interpretation or amendment that has been issued but is not yet effective.
IFRS 9 Financial Instruments
IFRS 9, Financial
Instruments, was issued in July 2014 and replaces IAS 39, Financial Instruments: Recognition and Measurement. It addresses the classification and measurement of financial assets and liabilities, introduces a new impairment model and a new
hedge accounting model. The Group will adopt the standard on the effective date of January 1, 2018.
The adoption of the new standard will impact the
classification and measurement of the Groups financial assets. The Group has assessed the investments currently classified as current available-for-sale, liquid assets, and will classify certain bank deposits to be measured at amortized cost
and certain investment funds to be measured at fair value through profit or loss at the adoption of the new standard. The rest of these investments satisfy the conditions for classification at fair value through other comprehensive income. Also
certain trade receivables currently carried at the invoiced amount less allowances for doubtful accounts that are managed with a business model of hold to collect and occasionally sell would be classified at fair value through other comprehensive
income. The Groups investments in venture funds that are currently classified as non-current available-for-sale investments would by default be classified at fair value through profit or loss with the election to classify certain investments
at fair value through other comprehensive income being available at the adoption of the new standard.
The Group has assessed the impact of the new impairment
model. As the credit quality of the Groups fixed income and money market investments is high, no significant impact from the new model is expected. While the Group has not yet assessed in detail the impact of the new model to its
current valuation allowances, there can be a limited impact to valuation allowances for trade receivables and loans extended to the Groups customers as the new model may result in an earlier recognition of credit losses.
The new hedge accounting rules will align the accounting for hedging instruments more closely with the Groups risk management practices. The Groups foreign
exchange risk management policy and hedge accounting model have already been aligned with the requirements from IFRS 9. Accordingly, the Group does not expect a significant impact on the accounting for its hedging relationships. The new standard
also introduces expanded disclosure requirements and changes in presentation that are expected to change the nature
and extent of the groups disclosures about its financial instruments, particularly in the year of the adoption
of the new standard. The Group continues to assess the detailed impact of IFRS 9.
IFRS 15 Revenue from Contracts with Customers
IFRS 15 Revenue from Contracts with Customers was issued in May 2014 and establishes a new five-step model that will apply to revenue arising from
contracts with customers. Under IFRS 15, revenue is recognized to reflect the transfer of promised goods and services to customers for amounts that reflect the consideration to which an entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods and
services to a customer. The Group will adopt the standard on the effective date of January 1, 2018. The new standard replaces IAS 18, Revenue, and IAS 11, Construction contracts. The Group is currently evaluating whether the application will be
the full retrospective or modified retrospective method, both permissible under the new standard.
The Group currently believes that the adoption of the new
standard will have a material impact on revenue. Specifically, under some license transfer contracts, revenue is expected to be recorded earlier at a point in time instead of over time. Due to the complexity of some of the Groups license
subscription contracts, the actual revenue recognition treatment required under the new standard will be dependent on contract-specific terms. Also, revenue related to certain software contracts is likely to change from over time under the current
standard to point in time. The Group continues to assess all potential impacts of IFRS 15.
IFRS 16 Leases
IFRS 16, Leases, issued in January 2016, sets out the requirements for the recognition, measurement, presentation and disclosure of leases. The Group expects to adopt
the standard on the effective date of January 1, 2019. The standard provides a single lessee accounting model, requiring lessees to recognize right-of-use assets and lease liabilities for substantially all leases on the consolidated statement
of financial position. The Group has started to analyze contracts containing identified assets and estimates that the standard will mainly affect the recognition and disclosure of the Groups operating leases. The full impact of IFRS
16 is currently being assessed. As of December 31, 2016 the Group has non-cancellable operating lease commitments of EUR 1 141 million. Refer to Note 30, Commitments and contingencies.
3. Use of estimates and critical accounting judgments
The preparation of consolidated financial statements requires use of management judgment in electing and applying accounting policies as well as in making estimates
that involve assumptions about the future. These judgments, estimates and assumptions may have a significant effect on the consolidated financial statements.
The
estimates used in determining the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities subject to estimation uncertainty are based on historical experience, expected outcomes and various other assumptions that were available when these consolidated
financial statements were prepared, and they are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances. The estimates are revised if changes in circumstances occur, or as a result of new information or more experience. As estimates inherently
contain a varying degree of uncertainty, actual outcomes may differ, resulting in additional charges or credits to the consolidated income statement.
Management
considers that the estimates, assumptions and judgments about the following accounting policies represent the most significant areas of estimation uncertainty and critical judgment that may have an impact on the consolidated financial
statements.
|
|
|
NOKIA ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 20-F 2016 |
|
157 |
Notes to consolidated financial statements continued
Business combinations
The
Group applies the acquisition method to account for acquisitions of separate entities or businesses. The determination of the fair value and allocation thereof to each separately identifiable asset acquired and liability assumed as well as the
determination of the acquisition date, when the valuation and allocation is to be conducted require estimation and judgment.
Estimation and judgment are required
in determining the fair value of the acquisition, including the discount rate, the terminal growth rate, the number of years on which to base the cash flow projections, and the assumptions and estimates used to determine the cash inflows and
outflows. The discount rate reflects current assessments of the time value of money, relevant market risk premiums, and industry comparisons. Risk premiums reflect risks and uncertainties for which the future cash flow estimates have not been
adjusted. Terminal values are based on the expected life of products and forecasted life cycle, and forecasted cash flows over that period. The assumptions are based on information available at the date of acquisition; actual results may differ
materially from the forecast as more information becomes available. Refer to Note 5, Acquisitions.
Judgment was required in determining the date on which the Group
obtained control of Alcatel Lucent. Nokia and Alcatel Lucent combined through a public exchange offer in which the Group offered to exchange all Alcatel Lucent shares, American Depositary Shares and OCEANE convertible bonds for Nokia shares. The
initial offer period was opened on November 18, 2015 and it was closed on December 23, 2015. On January 4, 2016 the French stock market authority Autorité des Marchés Financiers (AMF) published the interim
results of the successful offer which indicated that the Group held 70.52% of the Alcatel Lucent share capital on a fully diluted basis. On January 7, 2016 the Group announced that it had settled the offer and registered the new shares in
the Finnish Trade Register, which created legal standing for the acquisition.
The management concluded that it had obtained control over Alcatel Lucent on
January 4, 2016 when it was announced that the offer had been successful and the Group had acquired the majority of voting rights in Alcatel Lucent.
In
addition, management judgment was used to determine that the initial and reopened offers would be accounted for as a linked transaction. Pursuant to the Article 232-4 of the AMF General Regulation, any public exchange offer made shall be
reopened with the same terms and conditions within ten trading days of publication of the final outcome of the offer provided that the offer has been successful. In conformity to this rule, the offer was reopened on January 14, 2016 and
closed on February 3, 2016. The AMF published the results of the reopened offer on February 10, 2016 according to which the Group held 91.25% of the share capital of Alcatel Lucent.
Based on the facts that the reopened offer was compulsory according to the AMF General Regulation, the same terms and conditions applied to both the initial and
reopened offers, and the reopened offer followed shortly after the initial offer and was open only for a short period, the management concluded that the initial and reopened offers are essentially parts of the same transaction. Therefore, the
ownership interests acquired in the initial and reopened offers were accounted for as if they were all acquired at the acquisition date as part of the transaction to gain control. Acquisitions of ownership interests subsequent to the closing of the
reopened offer were accounted for as equity transactions with the non-controlling interests in Alcatel Lucent.
Revenue recognition
The
Group enters into transactions involving multiple components consisting of any combination of hardware, services, software and intellectual property rights where the Group identifies the separate components and estimates their relative fair values,
considering the economic substance of the entire arrangement. The fair value of each component is determined by taking into consideration factors such as the price of the component when sold separately and the component cost plus a reasonable margin
when price references are not available. The determination of the fair value and allocation thereof to each separately identifiable component requires the use of estimates and judgment which may have a significant impact on the timing
and amount of revenue recognized. In some multiple element licensing transactions, the Group applies the residual method in the absence of reference information.
Net sales includes revenue from all licensing negotiations, litigations and arbitrations to the extent that the criteria for revenue recognition have been met. The
final outcome may differ from the current estimate. Refer to Note 7, Revenue recognition.
Pension and other post-employment benefit obligations
and expenses
The determination of pension and other post-employment benefit obligations and expenses for defined benefit plans is dependent on
a number of estimates and assumptions, including the discount rate, future mortality rate, annual rate of increase in future compensation levels, and healthcare costs trend rates and usage of services in the United States where the majority
of our post-employment healthcare plans are maintained. A portion of plan assets is invested in debt and equity securities, which are subject to market volatility. Changes in assumptions and actuarial estimates may materially affect the
benefit obligation, future expense and future cash flow. Based on these estimates and assumptions, defined benefit obligations amount to EUR 28 663 million (EUR 1 840 million in 2015) and the fair value of plan
assets amounts to EUR 27 770 million (EUR 1 451 million in 2015). The increase in both defined benefit obligations and fair value of plan assets in 2016 compared to 2015 is due to the Acquisition of Alcatel Lucent.
Refer to Note 27, Pensions and other post-employment benefits.
Income taxes
The Group is subject to income taxes in the jurisdictions in which it operates. Judgment is required in determining current tax expense, uncertain tax positions,
deferred tax assets and deferred tax liabilities; and the extent to which deferred tax assets can be recognized.
Estimates related to the recoverability
of deferred tax assets are based on forecasted future taxable income and tax planning strategies. Based on these estimates and assumptions, the Group has EUR 20 952 million (EUR 1 843 million in 2015) of temporary
differences, tax losses carry forward and tax credits for which no deferred tax assets are recognized due to uncertainty of utilization. Majority of the unrecognized deferred tax assets relate to France. Refer to Note 12, Income taxes.
The utilization of deferred tax assets is dependent on future taxable profit in excess of the profit arising from the reversal of existing taxable temporary
differences. The recognition of deferred tax assets is based on the assessment of whether it is more likely than not that sufficient taxable profit will be available in the future to utilize the reversal of deductible temporary differences, unused
tax losses and unused tax credits before the unused tax losses and unused tax credits expire. Recognition of deferred tax assets involves judgment regarding the future financial performance of the particular legal entity or tax group that has
recognized the deferred tax asset.
|
|
|
158 |
|
NOKIA ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 20-F 2016 |
Liabilities for uncertain tax positions are recorded based on estimates and assumptions of the amount and likelihood of
outflow of economic resources when it is more likely than not that certain positions may not be fully sustained upon review by local tax authorities. Currently, the Group has ongoing tax investigations in multiple jurisdictions, including India and
Germany. Due to the inherently uncertain nature of tax investigations, the ultimate outcome or actual cost of settlement may vary materially from estimates. Refer to Note 12, Income taxes.
Carrying value of cash-generating units (CGUs)
The recoverable
amounts of the groups of CGUs and the CGU were based on fair value less costs of disposal that was determined using market participant assumptions based on a discounted cash flow calculation. The cash flow projections used in calculating the
recoverable amounts were based on financial plans approved by management covering an explicit forecast period of five years. Five additional years of cash flow projections subsequent to the explicit forecast period reflect a gradual progression
towards the steady state cash flow projections modeled in the terminal year. Estimation and judgment are required in determining the components of the recoverable amount calculation, including the discount rate, the terminal growth rate,
estimated revenue growth rates, gross margin and operating margin. The discount rates reflect current assessments of the time value of money and relevant market risk premiums reflecting risks and uncertainties for which the future cash flow
estimates have not been adjusted. The terminal growth rate assumptions reflect long-term average growth rates for the industry and economies in which the groups of CGUs and the CGU operate.
The Group allocated a significant proportion of the goodwill arising from the Acquisition of Alcatel Lucent to the IP/Optical Networks group of CGUs, which is comprised
mainly of businesses acquired in the acquisition. As a result, the fair value of the IP/Optical Networks group of CGUs corresponds closely to its respective carrying amount.
The results of the impairment testing indicate significant headroom for each group of CGUs and CGU, except for the IP/Optical Networks group of CGUs, where the
recoverable amount exceeds its carrying amount by approximately EUR 1 200 million. Taken in isolation, the following changes would cause the recoverable amount of IP/Optical Networks group of CGUs to equal its carrying amount:
∎ |
|
Increase in discount rate from 8.9% to 10.7%. |
∎ |
|
Reduction in operational profitability in the terminal year by 40% which is equal to the decrease in the operating profit of EUR 331 million. |
Total goodwill amounts to EUR 5 724 million as of December 31, 2016 (EUR 237 million in 2015). Refer to Note 14, Intangible assets and Note 16,
Impairment.
Allowances for doubtful accounts
Allowances for doubtful
accounts are recognized for estimated losses resulting from customers inability to meet payment obligations. Estimation and judgment are required in determining the value of allowances for doubtful accounts at each reporting date. Management
specifically analyzes accounts receivable and historical bad debt; customer concentrations; customer creditworthiness; past due balances; current economic trends; and changes in customer payment terms when determining allowances for doubtful
accounts. Additional allowances may be required in future periods if financial positions of customers deteriorate, reducing their ability to meet payment obligations. Based on these estimates and assumptions, allowances for doubtful accounts
are EUR 168 million (EUR 62 million in 2015), representing 2% of accounts receivable (2% in 2015). Refer to Note 18, Allowances for doubtful accounts.
Allowances for excess and obsolete inventory
Allowances for excess and obsolete inventory are recognized for excess amounts, obsolescence and declines in net realizable value below cost. Estimation and judgment
are required in determining the value of the allowance for excess and obsolete inventory at each reporting date. Management specifically analyzes estimates of future demand for products when determining allowances for excess and obsolete inventory.
Changes in these estimates could result in revisions to the valuation of inventory in future periods. Based on these estimates and assumptions, allowances for excess and obsolete inventory are EUR 456 million (EUR 195 million in 2015),
representing 15% of inventory (16% in 2015). Refer to Note 17, Inventories.
Fair value of derivatives and other financial instruments
The fair value of derivatives and other financial instruments that are not traded in an active market such as unlisted equities is determined using valuation
techniques. Estimation and judgment are required in selecting an appropriate valuation technique and in determining the underlying assumptions. Where quoted market prices are not available for unlisted shares, the fair value is based on a number of
factors including, but not limited to, the current market value of similar instruments; prices established from recent arms-length transactions; and/or analysis of market prospects and operating performance of target companies with reference
to public market comparable companies in similar industry sectors. Changes in these estimates could result in impairments or losses in future periods. Based on these estimates and assumptions, the fair value of derivatives and other financial
instruments that are not traded in an active market, using non-observable data (level 3 of the fair value hierarchy), is EUR 660 million (EUR 688 million in 2015), representing 24% of total net financial assets measured at
fair value on a recurring basis (19% in 2015). Refer to Note 24, Fair value of financial instruments.
Provisions
Provisions are recognized when the Group has a present legal or constructive obligation as a result of past events, it is probable that an outflow of resources
will be required to settle the obligation, and a reliable estimate of the amount can be made. At times, judgment is required in determining whether the Group has a present obligation; estimation is required in determining the value of the
obligation. Whilst provisions are based on the best estimate of unavoidable costs, management may be required to make a number of assumptions surrounding the amount and likelihood of outflow of economic resources, and the timing of payment.
Changes in estimates of timing or amounts of costs to be incurred may become necessary as time passes and/or more accurate information becomes available. Based on these estimates and assumptions, provisions amount to
EUR 1 980 million (EUR 725 million in 2015). Refer to Note 29, Provisions.
Legal contingencies
Legal proceedings covering a wide range of matters are pending or threatened in various jurisdictions. Provisions are recognized for pending litigation when it is
apparent that an unfavorable outcome is probable and a best estimate of unavoidable costs can be reasonably estimated. Due to the inherently uncertain nature of litigation, the ultimate outcome or actual cost of settlement may vary materially from
estimates. Refer to Note 29, Provisions.
|
|
|
NOKIA ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 20-F 2016 |
|
159 |
Notes to consolidated financial statements continued
4. Segment information
The
Group has two businesses: Nokias Networks business and Nokia Technologies, and three reportable segments for financial reporting purposes: (1) Ultra Broadband Networks and (2) IP Networks and Applications within Nokias Networks
business; and (3) Nokia Technologies. Segment-level information for Group Common and Other is also presented.
The Group has aggregated Mobile Networks and
Fixed Networks operating segments to one reportable segment, Ultra Broadband Networks; and IP/Optical Networks and Applications & Analytics operating segments to one reportable segment, IP Networks and Applications. The aggregated operating
segments have similar economic characteristics, such as long-term margins; have similar products, production processes, distribution methods and customers; and operate in a similar regulatory environment.
The current operational and reporting structure was adopted following the Acquisition of Alcatel Lucent on January 4, 2016. Previously the Group had three
operating and reportable segments in its Continuing operations for management reporting purposes: Mobile Broadband and Global Services within Nokia Networks, and Nokia Technologies. Prior period segment information has been regrouped and recasted
for comparability purposes according to the new operating and reporting structure.
The chief operating decision maker receives monthly financial information for
the operating and reportable segments. Key financial performance measures of the reportable segments include primarily net sales and operating profit. The chief operating decision maker evaluates the performance of the segments and allocates
resources to them based on segment operating profit(1).
Accounting policies of the segments are the same as
those described in Note 2, Significant accounting policies. Inter-segment revenues and transfers are accounted for as if the revenues were to third parties, that is, at current market prices. Certain costs and revenue adjustments(1) are not
allocated to the segments.
No single customer represents 10% or more of revenues.
Segment descriptions
Ultra Broadband Networks
Ultra Broadband Networks comprises Mobile Networks and Fixed Networks operating segments.
The Mobile Networks operating segment offers an industry-leading portfolio of end-to-end mobile networking solutions comprising hardware, software and services for
telecommunications operators, enterprises and related markets/verticals, such as public safety and Internet of Things (IoT).
The Fixed Networks
operating segment provides copper and fiber access products, solutions and services. The portfolio allows for a customized combination of technologies that brings fiber to the most economical point for the customer.
IP Networks and Applications
IP Networks and
Applications comprises IP/Optical Networks and Applications & Analytics operating segments.
The IP/Optical Networks operating segment provides the key IP
routing and optical transport systems, software and services to build high capacity network infrastructure for the internet and global connectivity.
The
Applications & Analytics operating segment offers software solutions spanning customer experience management, network operations and management, communications and collaboration, policy and charging, as well as Cloud, IoT, security,
and analytics platforms that enable digital services providers and enterprises to accelerate innovation, monetize services, and optimize their customer experience.
Nokia Technologies
The Nokia Technologies
operating segment has two main objectives: to drive growth and renewal in its existing patent licensing business; and to build new businesses based on breakthrough innovation in key technologies and products, in the areas of Digital Media
and Digital Health.
From January 2016, the majority of net sales and related costs and expenses attributable to licensing and patenting the separate patent
portfolios of Nokia Technologies, Nokias Networks business, and Nokia Bell Labs are recorded in Nokia Technologies. Each reportable segment continues to separately record its own research and development expenses.
Group Common and Other
Segment-level
information for Group Common and Other is also presented. From January 2016, Group Common and Other includes the Alcatel-Lucent Submarine Networks and Radio Frequency Systems businesses, both of which are being managed as separate entities.
In addition, Group Common and Other includes Nokia Bell Labs operating expenses, as well as certain corporate-level and centrally managed operating expenses.
(1) |
Segment results exclude costs related to the Acquisition of Alcatel Lucent and related integration, goodwill impairment charges, intangible asset amortization and other purchase price fair value adjustments,
restructuring and associated charges and certain other items. |
|
|
|
160 |
|
NOKIA ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 20-F 2016 |
Segment information
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EURm |
|
|
Ultra
Broadband Networks |
(1) |
|
|
IP Networks
and Applications |
(2) |
|
|
Nokias
Networks business total |
(3) |
|
|
Nokia Technologies |
|
|
|
Group Common and Other |
|
|
|
Eliminations |
|
|
|
Segment total |
|
|
|
Unallocated
items |
(4) |
|
|
Total |
|
Continuing operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2016 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales to external customers |
|
|
15 770 |
|
|
|
6 029 |
|
|
|
21 799 |
|
|
|
1 038 |
|
|
|
1 108 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23 945 |
|
|
|
(331 |
) |
|
|
23 614 |
|
Net sales to other segments |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
37 |
|
|
|
(53 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
348 |
|
|
|
151 |
|
|
|
499 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
45 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
552 |
|
|
|
1 042 |
|
|
|
1 594 |
|
Impairment charges |
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17 |
|
Operating profit/(loss) |
|
|
1 362 |
|
|
|
573 |
|
|
|
1 935 |
|
|
|
579 |
|
|
|
(342 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 172 |
|
|
|
(3 272 |
) |
|
|
(1 100 |
) |
Share of results of associated companies and joint
ventures |
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18 |
|
2015 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales to external customers |
|
|
10 159 |
|
|
|
1 328 |
|
|
|
11 487 |
|
|
|
1 012 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12 499 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12 499 |
|
Net sales to other segments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(15 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
158 |
|
|
|
35 |
|
|
|
193 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
207 |
|
|
|
79 |
|
|
|
286 |
|
Impairment charges |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11 |
|
Operating profit/(loss) |
|
|
1 211 |
|
|
|
138 |
|
|
|
1 349 |
|
|
|
698 |
|
|
|
(89 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 958 |
|
|
|
(261 |
) |
|
|
1 697 |
|
Share of results of associated companies and joint
ventures |
|
|
29 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
29 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
29 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
29 |
|
2014 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales to external customers |
|
|
9 817 |
|
|
|
1 326 |
|
|
|
11 143 |
|
|
|
618 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11 762 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11 762 |
|
Net sales to other segments |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(15 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
131 |
|
|
|
33 |
|
|
|
164 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
173 |
|
|
|
67 |
|
|
|
240 |
|
Impairment charges |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13 |
|
Operating profit/(loss) |
|
|
1 251 |
|
|
|
188 |
|
|
|
1 439 |
|
|
|
389 |
|
|
|
(226 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 602 |
|
|
|
(188 |
) |
|
|
1 414 |
|
Share of results of associated companies and joint
ventures |
|
|
(12 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(12 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(12 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(12 |
) |
(1) |
Includes Mobile Networks net sales of EUR 13 406 million (EUR 10 023 million in 2015 and EUR 9 639 million in 2014) and Fixed Networks net sales of EUR 2 365 million (EUR 136 million in 2015
and EUR 179 million in 2014). |
(2) |
Includes IP Routing net sales of EUR 2 940 million (EUR 515 million in 2015 and EUR 523 million in 2014), Optical Networks net sales of EUR 1 562 million and Applications & Analytics net
sales of EUR 1 527 million (EUR 813 million in 2015 and EUR 803 million in 2014). |
(3) |
Includes services net sales of EUR 8 531 million (EUR 5 424 million in 2015 and EUR 5 078 million in 2014). |
(4) |
Excludes costs related to the Acquisition of Alcatel Lucent and related integration, goodwill impairment charges, intangible asset amortization and other purchase price fair value adjustments, restructuring and
associated charges and certain other items. |
Reconciliation of total segment operating profit to total operating profit
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EURm |
|
2016 |
|
|
2015 |
|
|
2014 |
|
Total segment operating profit |
|
|
2 172 |
|
|
|
1 958 |
|
|
|
1 602 |
|
Amortization and depreciation of acquired intangible assets and property, plant and equipment |
|
|
(1 026 |
) |
|
|
(79 |
) |
|
|
(67 |
) |
Release of acquisition-related fair value adjustments to deferred revenue and inventory |
|
|
(840 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restructuring and associated charges |
|
|
(774 |
) |
|
|
(123 |
) |
|
|
(57 |
) |
Product portfolio strategy costs |
|
|
(348 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Transaction and related costs, including integration costs relating to the Acquisition of Alcatel
Lucent |
|
|
(295 |
) |
|
|
(99 |
) |
|
|
(39 |
) |
Other |
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
40 |
|
|
|
(25 |
) |
Total operating
(loss)/profit |
|
|
(1 100 |
) |
|
|
1 697 |
|
|
|
1 414 |
|
|
|
|
NOKIA ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 20-F 2016 |
|
161 |
Notes to consolidated financial statements continued
Net sales to external customers by geographic location of customer
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EURm |
|
2016 |
|
|
2015 |
|
|
2014 |
|
Finland(1) |
|
|
1 138 |
|
|
|
1 100 |
|
|
|
680 |
|
United States |
|
|
6 635 |
|
|
|
1 489 |
|
|
|
1 445 |
|
China |
|
|
2 249 |
|
|
|
1 323 |
|
|
|
994 |
|
India |
|
|
1 281 |
|
|
|
1 098 |
|
|
|
768 |
|
France |
|
|
1 055 |
|
|
|
207 |
|
|
|
220 |
|
United Kingdom |
|
|
717 |
|
|
|
394 |
|
|
|
296 |
|
Australia |
|
|
646 |
|
|
|
133 |
|
|
|
189 |
|
Japan |
|
|
627 |
|
|
|
877 |
|
|
|
1 194 |
|
Germany |
|
|
567 |
|
|
|
312 |
|
|
|
400 |
|
Saudi Arabia |
|
|
565 |
|
|
|
364 |
|
|
|
291 |
|
Other |
|
|
8 134 |
|
|
|
5 202 |
|
|
|
5 285 |
|
Total |
|
|
23 614 |
|
|
|
12 499 |
|
|
|
11 762 |
|
(1) |
All Nokia Technologies IPR and licensing net sales are allocated to Finland. |
Non-current assets by geographic
location(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EURm |
|
2016 |
|
|
2015 |
|
Finland |
|
|
726 |
|
|
|
724 |
|
United States |
|
|
7 946 |
|
|
|
159 |
|
France |
|
|
2 369 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
China |
|
|
458 |
|
|
|
129 |
|
India |
|
|
130 |
|
|
|
70 |
|
Other |
|
|
1 312 |
|
|
|
171 |
|
Total |
|
|
12 941 |
|
|
|
1 255 |
|
(1) |
Consists of goodwill and other intangible assets and property, plant and equipment. |
5. Acquisitions
Alcatel Lucent business combination
On
April 15, 2015, the Group and Alcatel Lucent announced their intention to combine through a public exchange offer (exchange offer) in France and the United States. Alcatel Lucent is a global leader in IP networking, ultra-broadband
access and Cloud applications. The combined company leverages the combined scale of operations, complementary technologies, portfolios and geographical presence; and unparalleled innovation capabilities to lead in the next generation network
technology and services, and to create access to an expanded addressable market with improved long-term growth opportunities.
Acquisition
of Alcatel Lucent Securities
The Group obtained control of Alcatel Lucent on January 4, 2016 when the interim results of the successful initial
exchange offer were announced by the French stock market authority, Autorité des Marchés Financiers (AMF). On January 14, 2016, as required by the AMF General Regulation, the Group reopened its exchange offer in France
and the United States for the outstanding Alcatel Lucent ordinary shares, Alcatel Lucent American Depositary Shares (ALU ADS) and OCEANE convertible bonds (the OCEANEs, collectively Alcatel Lucent Securities) not
tendered during the initial exchange offer period. The reopened exchange offer closed on February 3, 2016. The Group has determined that the initial and the reopened exchange offers are linked transactions that are considered together as a
single arrangement, given that the reopened exchange offer is required by the AMF General Regulation and is based on the same terms and conditions as the initial exchange offer.
As part of the exchange offers, holders of Alcatel Lucent Securities could exchange Alcatel Lucent Securities for Nokia shares and Nokia American Depositary Shares
(Nokia ADS) on the basis of 0.55 Nokia share or Nokia ADS for every Alcatel Lucent share or ALU ADS.
Following the initial and reopened exchange
offers, the Group held 90.34% of the share capital, and at least 90.25% of the voting rights of Alcatel Lucent. The Group issued a total of 1 776 379 756 new Nokia shares as consideration for the Alcatel Lucent Securities tendered in the exchange
offers.
Alcatel Lucent ordinary shares and ALU ADSs acquired subsequent to the closing of the reopened exchange offer, including through the Public Buy-Out Offer
and the Squeeze-Out, were accounted for as equity transactions with the remaining non-controlling interests in Alcatel Lucent. As such, any new Nokia shares or cash consideration paid for these instruments were recorded directly in equity against
the carrying amount of non-controlling interests. The acquisition of OCEANEs subsequent to the transactions linked to the exchange offer was treated both as extinguishment of debt and equity transaction with remaining non-controlling interests
in Alcatel Lucent, with the redemption consideration allocated to the liability and equity components.
|
|
|
162 |
|
NOKIA ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 20-F 2016 |
Subsequent to the exchange offers, the following transactions were carried out relating to the acquisition of the remaining outstanding equity interests in Alcatel
Lucent:
∎ |
|
On February 12, 2016, the OCEANEs acquired as part of the initial and reopened exchange offers were converted to Alcatel Lucent shares. |
∎ |
|
On February 19, 2016, the Group announced the issue of 6 501 503 new Nokia shares in exchange for Alcatel Lucent shares in a private transaction at the 0.55 exchange offer provided in the initial and reopened
exchange offers. This transaction was based on a Board of Directors resolution on February 18, 2016. |
∎ |
|
On May 9, 2016, the acquisition of 107 775 949 Alcatel Lucent shares was closed in exchange for 59 276 772 new Nokia shares from JPMorgan Chase Bank N.A., as depositary, pursuant to the share purchase agreement
announced on March 17, 2016. These shares represented Alcatel Lucent shares that remained in the ALU ADS receipts program after the cancellation period and following the programs termination on April 25, 2016. |
∎ |
|
On May 12, 2016, the Group agreed to acquire 72 994 133 of 2019 OCEANEs and 19 943 533 of 2020 OCEANEs through a privately negotiated transaction in consideration for an aggregate cash payment of EUR 419 million.
|
∎ |
|
On June 17, 2016, 24 392 270 Alcatel Lucent shares, 9 614 661 of 2019 OCEANEs and 2 290 001 of 2020 OCEANEs were acquired through privately negotiated transactions in consideration for an aggregate cash payment of
EUR 85 million for the Alcatel Lucent shares (corresponding to a unit price of EUR 3.50 per share) and EUR 54 million for the OCEANEs (corresponding to a unit price of EUR 4.51 per 2019 OCEANE and EUR 4.50 per 2020 OCEANE).
|
Following these transactions, the Group held 95.32% of the share capital and 95.25% of the voting rights in Alcatel Lucent, corresponding
to 95.15% of the Alcatel Lucent shares on a fully diluted basis.
On September 6, 2016, a joint offer document was filed with Alcatel Lucent with the AMF
relating to the proposed Public Buy-Out Offer, in cash, for the remaining Alcatel Lucent shares and OCEANEs (the Public Buy-Out Offer). The Public Buy-Out Offer was followed by a Squeeze-Out in accordance with the AMF General Regulation,
in cash, for the Shares and OCEANEs not tendered into the Public Buy-Out Offer (the Squeeze-Out, and together with the Public Buy-Out Offer, the Offer).
Following the AMF Offer clearance decision on September 20, 2016, the Group commenced the Public Buy-Out Offer on September 22, 2016 pursuant to which it
proposed to all holders of the Alcatel Lucent shares and OCEANEs to acquire Nokia securities. The financial terms of the Public Buy-Out Offer were:
∎ |
|
EUR 3.50 per Alcatel Lucent share; |
∎ |
|
EUR 4.51 per 2019 OCEANE; and |
∎ |
|
EUR 4.50 per 2020 OCEANE. |
On October 4, 2016, the AMF announced that a legal action was filed before the
Paris Court of Appeal on September 30, 2016 for the annulment of the AMFs Offer clearance decision. Pursuant to the AMF General Regulation, the Group provided a pledge in relation to the Offer to cover the purchase of the remaining
Alcatel Lucent Securities.
On October 25, 2016, the AMF announced the continuation of the Offer timetable. Accordingly, the Public Buy-Out Offer period ended
on October 31, 2016, and the Squeeze-Out was implemented on November 2, 2016, in accordance with the AMF General Regulation. In the Squeeze-Out, the Alcatel Lucent shares and OCEANEs not tendered into the Public Buy-Out Offer were
transferred to the Group for the same consideration as the above-mentioned consideration of the Public Buy-Out Offer, net of all costs. The remaining outstanding Alcatel Lucent stock options and performance shares were modified to settle
in cash or Nokia shares.
On November 2, 2016, following the Public Buy-Out Offer and the Squeeze-Out, the Group held 100% of the share capital and voting
rights of Alcatel Lucent. Alcatel Lucent shares and OCEANEs were delisted from the Euronext Paris regulated market on the same date.
On December 15,
2016, the plaintiffs withdrew their complaint for the annulment of the AMFs Offer clearance decision from the Paris Court of Appeal. Consequently, the commitments, put in place as a precautionary measure, are no longer in force and the
funds and Alcatel Lucent Securities deposited into escrow accounts were released and the Group no longer has an obligation to maintain the integrity of the entity Alcatel Lucent SA.
Purchase consideration
The purchase
consideration comprises the fair value of the consideration paid for the Alcatel Lucent Securities obtained through the exchange offers, and the fair value of the portion of Alcatel Lucent stock options and performance shares attributable to
pre-combination services that were settled with Nokia shares. The fair value of the purchase consideration is based on the closing price of Nokia share of EUR 6.58 on Nasdaq Helsinki on January 4, 2016, and the exchange offer ratio of
0.55 Nokia share for every Alcatel Lucent share.
|
|
|
NOKIA ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 20-F 2016 |
|
163 |
Notes to consolidated financial statements continued
Fair value of the purchase consideration:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EURm |
|
Alcatel Lucent shares or ADSs |
|
|
10 046 |
|
OCEANE convertible bonds |
|
|
1 570 |
|
Consideration attributable to the vested portion of replacement
share-based payment awards |
|
|
6 |
|
Total |
|
|
11 622 |
|
Fair value of the purchase consideration is based on the results of the initial and the reopened exchange offers.
Purchase accounting
The Group has finalized
Alcatel Lucent acquisition-related purchase accounting, including purchase price allocation. The fair values of the identifiable assets and liabilities, as of the date of acquisition:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EURm |
|
Non-current assets |
|
|
|
|
Intangible assets |
|
|
5 711 |
|
Property, plant and equipment |
|
|
1 412 |
|
Deferred tax assets |
|
|
2 328 |
|
Defined benefit pension assets |
|
|
3 201 |
|
Other non-current assets |
|
|
687 |
|
Total non-current
assets |
|
|
13 339 |
|
Current assets |
|
|
|
|
Inventories |
|
|
1 992 |
|
Accounts receivable |
|
|
2 813 |
|
Other current assets |
|
|
1 360 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
6 198 |
|
Total current assets |
|
|
12 363 |
|
Total assets
acquired |
|
|
25 702 |
|
Non-current liabilities |
|
|
|
|
Long-term interest-bearing liabilities |
|
|
4 037 |
|
Deferred tax liabilities |
|
|
425 |
|
Defined benefit pension and post-retirement liabilities |
|
|
4 464 |
|
Other non-current liabilities |
|
|
601 |
|
Total non-current
liabilities |
|
|
9 527 |
|
Current liabilities |
|
|
|
|
Current borrowings and other financial liabilities |
|
|
671 |
|
Other current liabilities |
|
|
7 252 |
|
Total current
liabilities |
|
|
7 923 |
|
Total liabilities
assumed |
|
|
17 450 |
|
Net identifiable assets
acquired |
|
|
8 252 |
|
Attributable to: |
|
|
|
|
Equity holders of the parent |
|
|
6 538 |
|
Non-controlling interests |
|
|
1 714 |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
5 084 |
|
Purchase
consideration |
|
|
11 622 |
|
Goodwill arising from the Acquisition of Alcatel Lucent amounts to EUR 5 084 million and is primarily attributable to synergies
arising from the significant economies of scale and scope that the Group is expecting to benefit from as part of the new combined entity. Goodwill was allocated to the four operating segments within Nokias Networks business. Refer to Note 16,
Impairment.
The components of non-controlling interests in Alcatel Lucent that are present ownership interests and entitle their holders to a proportionate share
of the entitys net assets in the event of liquidation, were measured based on the non-controlling interests proportionate share of the fair value of the acquired identifiable net assets. As such, goodwill excludes the goodwill
related to the non-controlling interests. The equity component of the remaining outstanding OCEANEs, as well as the outstanding stock options and performance shares that will be settled in Alcatel Lucent ordinary shares were measured at fair value
within non-controlling interests.
|
|
|
164 |
|
NOKIA ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 20-F 2016 |
Fair values of other intangible assets acquired:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value EURm |
|
|
Amortization period
years |
|
Customer relationships |
|
|
2 902 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
Technologies |
|
|
2 170 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
Other |
|
|
639 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
Total |
|
|
5 711 |
|
|
|
|
|
Acquisition-related costs not directly attributable to the issue of shares, recorded in selling, general and administrative expenses
and other expenses in the consolidated income statement, and in operating cash flows in the consolidated statement of cash flows, amount to EUR 125 million, of which EUR 93 million is recognized in 2016.
From January 4 to December 31, 2016 the acquired business contributed revenues of EUR 12 151 million and a net loss of EUR 508 million to the
consolidated income statement. These amounts have been calculated using the subsidiarys results, adjusting them for accounting policy alignments.
Other acquisitions
In 2016 the Group acquired four businesses (two businesses
in 2015), which are individually immaterial to the consolidated financial statements. Goodwill arising on acquisitions is attributable to future derivations of the acquired technology, future customers and assembled workforce, and has been
allocated to cash-generating units or groups of cash-generating units expected to benefit from the synergies of the combination. Refer to Note 16, Impairment. The majority of goodwill acquired in 2016 is not expected to be deductible for tax
purposes. The acquired intangible assets are primarily technology-based intangible assets.
Acquisitions in 2016 and 2015:
|
|
|
Company/business |
|
Description |
2016 |
|
|
Nakina Systems Inc. |
|
Nakina Systems Inc. is a Canadian security and operational systems software company. The Group acquired the business through an asset transaction on March 31, 2016. |
Withings S.A. |
|
Withings S.A. is a provider of digital health products and services. The Group acquired 100% ownership interest on May 31, 2016. |
Gainspeed |
|
Gainspeed is a United States-based start-up specializing in Distributed Access Architecture (DDA) solutions for the cable industry through its Virtual Converged
Cable Access Platform (CCAP) product line. The Group acquired 100% ownership interest on July 29, 2016. |
ETA Devices |
|
ETA Devices is a United States-based start-up specializing in power amplifier efficiency solutions for base stations, access points and devices. The Group acquired 100%
ownership interest on October 4, 2016. |
2015 |
|
|
Wireless network business of Panasonic |
|
The business transfer included Panasonics LTE/3G wireless base station system business, related wireless equipment system business, fixed assets and business contracts with
Panasonics customers as well as more than 300 Panasonic employees. The Group acquired the business through an asset transaction on January 1, 2015. |
Eden Rock Communications, LLC |
|
Eden Rock Communications is a pioneer in SON and creator of Eden-NET, an industry leading multivendor centralized in SON solution. The Group acquired 100% ownership interest on July 10,
2015. |
Total consideration paid, aggregate fair values of intangible assets, other net assets acquired and resulting goodwill as of each
acquisition date:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EURm |
|
2016 |
|
|
2015 |
|
Other intangible assets |
|
|
70 |
|
|
|
56 |
|
Other net assets |
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
33 |
|
Total identifiable net
assets |
|
|
86 |
|
|
|
89 |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
274 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
Total purchase consideration(1) |
|
|
360 |
|
|
|
96 |
|
(1) |
The total purchase consideration does not equal to the acquisition of businesses, net of acquired cash in the consolidated statement of cash flows due to foreign exchange rate differences and the timing of the
consideration payment. |
|
|
|
NOKIA ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 20-F 2016 |
|
165 |
Notes to consolidated financial statements continued
6. Disposals treated as Discontinued operations
Results of Discontinued operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EURm |
|
2016 |
|
|
2015 |
|
|
2014 |
|
Net sales |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 075 |
|
|
|
3 428 |
|
Cost of sales |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(244 |
) |
|
|
(2 325 |
) |
Gross profit |
|
|
|
|
|
|
831 |
|
|
|
1 103 |
|
Research and development expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(498 |
) |
|
|
(899 |
) |
Selling, general and administrative expenses |
|
|
(11 |
) |
|
|
(213 |
) |
|
|
(628 |
) |
Other income and expenses |
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
(23 |
) |
|
|
(1 354 |
) |
Operating (loss)/profit |
|
|
(15 |
) |
|
|
97 |
|
|
|
(1 778 |
) |
Financial income and expenses |
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
(9 |
) |
|
|
10 |
|
(Loss)/profit before tax |
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
88 |
|
|
|
(1 768 |
) |
Income tax (expense)/benefit |
|
|
(28 |
) |
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
(277 |
) |
(Loss)/profit for the year, ordinary
activities |
|
|
(29 |
) |
|
|
96 |
|
|
|
(2 045 |
) |
Gain on the sale of HERE and D&S Businesses, net of tax(1) |
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
1 178 |
|
|
|
2 803 |
|
(Loss)/profit for the
year |
|
|
(15 |
) |
|
|
1 274 |
|
|
|
758 |
|
(1) |
In 2016, an additional gain on the sale of EUR 7 million was recognized related to the HERE business as a result of the final settlement of the purchase price, and EUR 7 million related to the D&S business
due to a tax indemnification. |
Sale of the HERE Business
On August 3, 2015 the Group announced the Sale of the HERE Business to a consortium of leading automotive companies, comprising AUDI AG, BMW Group and Daimler AG.
Subsequent to the announcement, the Group has presented the HERE business as Discontinued operations. The HERE business was previously an operating and reportable segment and its business focused on the development of location intelligence,
location-based services and local commerce. The Sale of the HERE Business was completed on December 4, 2015.
Gain on the Sale of the
HERE Business
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EURm |
|
Fair value of sales proceeds less costs to
sell(1) |
|
|
2 551 |
|
Net assets disposed of |
|
|
(2 667 |
) |
Total |
|
|
(116 |
) |
Foreign exchange differences reclassified from other comprehensive
income(2) |
|
|
1 174 |
|
Gain before tax |
|
|
1 058 |
|
Income tax
benefit(3) |
|
|
120 |
|
Total gain |
|
|
1 178 |
|
(1) |
Comprises purchase price of EUR 2 800 million, offset by adjustments for certain defined liabilities of EUR 249 million. |
(2) |
Includes cumulative translation differences for the duration of ownership from translation of mainly U.S. dollar denominated balances into euro. |
(3) |
The disposal was largely tax exempt, the tax benefit is due to hedging-related tax deductible losses. |
Assets and liabilities, HERE business
Assets and liabilities disposed of at December 4, 2015:
|
|
|
|
|
EURm |
|
December 4, 2015 |
|
Goodwill and other intangible assets |
|
|
2 722 |
|
Property, plant and equipment |
|
|
115 |
|
Deferred tax assets and non-current assets |
|
|
151 |
|
Inventories |
|
|
14 |
|
Trade and other receivables |
|
|
174 |
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets |
|
|
87 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents and current available-for-sale
investments, liquid assets |
|
|
56 |
|
Total assets |
|
|
3 319 |
|
Deferred tax liabilities and other liabilities |
|
|
286 |
|
Trade and other payables |
|
|
55 |
|
Deferred income and accrued expenses |
|
|
306 |
|
Provisions |
|
|
5 |
|
Total liabilities |
|
|
652 |
|
Net assets disposed
of |
|
|
2 667 |
|
|
|
|
166 |
|
NOKIA ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 20-F 2016 |
Results of Discontinued operations, HERE business
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EURm |
|
2016 |
|
|
2015 |
|
|
2014 |
|
Net sales |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 075 |
|
|
|
970 |
|
Cost of sales |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(243 |
) |
|
|
(239 |
) |
Gross profit |
|
|
|
|
|
|
832 |
|
|
|
731 |
|
Research and development expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(498 |
) |
|
|
(545 |
) |
Selling, general and administrative expenses |
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
(198 |
) |
|
|
(181 |
) |
Other income and expenses(1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(18 |
) |
|
|
(1 247 |
) |
Operating (loss)/profit |
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
118 |
|
|
|
(1 242 |
) |
Financial income and expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
(Loss)/profit before tax |
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
120 |
|
|
|
(1 237 |
) |
Income tax
expense(2) |
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(310 |
) |
(Loss)/profit for the year, ordinary
activities |
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
120 |
|
|
|
(1 547 |
) |
Gain on the Sale of the HERE Business, net of tax(3) |
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
1 178 |
|
|
|
|
|
Profit/(loss) for the
year |
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
1 298 |
|
|
|
(1 547 |
) |
Costs and expenses include: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(33 |
) |
|
|
(57 |
) |
Impairment charges |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1 209 |
) |
|
|
(1) In 2014, includes impairment of goodwill of EUR 1 209 million.
(2) Excludes the tax impact of the disposal.
(3) Represents net gain on disposal. In 2016, includes EUR 7 million recognized as a result of the final
settlement of the purchase price.
Cash flows from Discontinued operations, HERE business |
|
|
|
|
|
EURm |
|
2016 |
|
|
2015 |
|
|
2014 |
|
Net cash (used in)/from operating activities |
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
106 |
|
Net cash (used in)/from investing activities |
|
|
(25 |
) |
|
|
2 503 |
|
|
|
(104 |
) |
Net cash flow for the
year |
|
|
(27 |
) |
|
|
2 515 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
Sale of the D&S Business
In September
2013, the Group announced the Sale of the D&S Business to Microsoft. Subsequent to the approval of the sale in the Extraordinary General Meeting in November 2013, the Group has presented the Devices & Services business as Discontinued
operations including items outside the final transaction scope; specifically, discontinued manufacturing facilities located in Chennai, India and Masan, Republic of Korea. The Devices & Services business consisted of two previously
reportable segments, Smart Devices and Mobile Phones as well as Devices & Services Other. Smart Devices focused on more advanced products, including smartphones powered by the Windows Phone operating system. Mobile Phones focused on
the area of mass market entry, feature phones and affordable smartphones. Devices & Services Other included spare parts, the divested Vertu business and major restructuring programs related to the Devices & Services business.
The Sale of the D&S Business was completed on April 25, 2014. The total purchase price was EUR 5 440 million comprising the Sale of the
D&S Business and a ten-year non-exclusive license to patents and patent applications with an option to extend the mutual patent agreement in perpetuity. The value allocated to the Sale of the D&S Business was EUR 3 790 million
and the fair value of the mutual patent agreement and the future option was EUR 1 650 million. The gain on disposal was EUR 3 175 million. The gain may change in subsequent periods depending on the development of certain liabilities for
which the Group has indemnified Microsoft.
Gain on the Sale of the D&S Business
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EURm |
|
Fair value of sales proceeds less costs to
sell(1) |
|
|
5 167 |
|
Net assets disposed of |
|
|
(2 347 |
) |
Settlement of Windows Phone royalty(2) |
|
|
383 |
|
Other |
|
|
(28 |
) |
Total |
|
|
3 175 |
|
Foreign exchange differences reclassified from other comprehensive
income |
|
|
(212 |
) |
Gain before tax |
|
|
2 963 |
|
Income tax
expense(3) |
|
|
(160 |
) |
Total gain |
|
|
2 803 |
|
(1) |
Comprises purchase price of EUR 3 790 million, net cash adjustment of EUR 1 114 and other adjustments of EUR 263 million. |
(2) |
Recognized when the partnership with Microsoft to license the Windows Phone smartphone platform was terminated in conjunction with the Sale of the D&S Business. |
(3) |
Primarily includes non-resident capital gains taxes in certain jurisdictions, as well as tax impacts of legal entity restructuring carried out in connection with the Sale of the D&S Business. |
|
|
|
NOKIA ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 20-F 2016 |
|
167 |
Notes to consolidated financial statements continued
Assets and liabilities, Devices & Services business
Assets and liabilities disposed of at April 25, 2014:
|
|
|
|
|
EURm |
|
April 25, 2014 |
|
Goodwill and other intangible assets |
|
|
1 427 |
|
Property, plant and equipment |
|
|
534 |
|
Deferred tax assets and non-current assets |
|
|
371 |
|
Inventories |
|
|
374 |
|
Trade and other receivables |
|
|
541 |
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets |
|
|
1 638 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents and current available-for-sale
investments, liquid assets |
|
|
1 114 |
|
Total assets |
|
|
5 999 |
|
Deferred tax liabilities and other liabilities |
|
|
203 |
|
Trade and other payables |
|
|
1 340 |
|
Deferred income and accrued expenses |
|
|
1 205 |
|
Provisions |
|
|
795 |
|
Total liabilities |
|
|
3 543 |
|
Non-controlling interests |
|
|
109 |
|
Net assets disposed
of |
|
|
2 347 |
|
Results of Discontinued operations, Devices & Services business
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EURm |
|
2016 |
|
|
2015 |
|
|
2014 |
|
Net sales |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 458 |
|
Cost of sales |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
(2 086 |
) |
Gross (loss)/profit |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
372 |
|
Research and development expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(354 |
) |
Selling, general and administrative expenses |
|
|
(10 |
) |
|
|
(15 |
) |
|
|
(447 |
) |
Other income and expenses |
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
|
(107 |
) |
Operating loss |
|
|
(14 |
) |
|
|
(21 |
) |
|
|
(536 |
) |
Financial income and expenses |
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
(11 |
) |
|
|
5 |
|
Loss before tax |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(32 |
) |
|
|
(531 |
) |
Income tax (expense)/benefit(1) |
|
|
(25 |
) |
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
33 |
|
Loss for the year, ordinary
activities |
|
|
(25 |
) |
|
|
(24 |
) |
|
|
(498 |
) |
Gain on the Sale of the D&S Business, net of tax(2) |
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 803 |
|
(Loss)/profit for the
year |
|
|
(18 |
) |
|
|
(24 |
) |
|
|
2 305 |
|
Costs and expenses include: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impairment charges |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(111 |
) |
|
|
(1) Excludes the tax impact of the disposal.
(2) Represents net gain on disposal. In 2016, includes EUR 7 million recognized due to a tax
indemnification. Cash flows from Discontinued operations,
Devices & Services business |
|
|
|
|
|
EURm |
|
2016 |
|
|
2015 |
|
|
2014 |
|
Net cash used in operating activities |
|
|
(8 |
) |
|
|
(6 |
) |
|
|
(1 054 |
) |
Net cash from investing activities |
|
|
28 |
|
|
|
50 |
|
|
|
2 480 |
|
Net cash used in financing activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(9 |
) |
Net cash flow for the
year |
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
44 |
|
|
|
1 417 |
|
On April 25, 2014, upon completion of the Sale of the D&S Business, EUR 500 million 1.125% convertible bonds due
September 2018, EUR 500 million 2.5% convertible bonds due September 2019 and EUR 500 million 3.625% convertible bonds due September 2020, all issued by the Group to Microsoft, were repaid and netted against the deal proceeds by the
amount of principal and accrued interest.
|
|
|
168 |
|
NOKIA ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 20-F 2016 |
7. Revenue recognition
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EURm |
|
2016 |
|
|
2015 |
|
|
2014 |
|
Continuing operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue from sale of products and licensing |
|
|
14 526 |
|
|
|
7 045 |
|
|
|
6 448 |
|
Revenue from services(1) |
|
|
8 156 |
|
|
|
5 395 |
|
|
|
4 961 |
|
Contract revenue recognized under percentage
of completion accounting(2) |
|
|
931 |
|
|
|
59 |
|
|
|
353 |
|
Total |
|
|
23 614 |
|
|
|
12 499 |
|
|
|
11 762 |
|
(1) |
Excludes services performed as part of contracts under percentage of completion accounting. |
(2) |
In 2016, contract revenue includes submarine projects, which account for the majority of the revenue. |
Revenue
recognition-related positions for construction contracts in progress as of December 31:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2016 |
|
|
2015 |
|
EURm |
|
Assets |
|
|
Liabilities |
|
|
Assets |
|
|
Liabilities |
|
Contract revenues recorded prior to billings |
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
|
|
Billings in excess of costs incurred |
|
|
|
|
|
|
164 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
29 |
|
Work in progress on construction contracts |
|
|
57 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Advances received |
|
|
|
|
|
|
113 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Retentions |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
Work in progress is included in inventories, other assets are included in accounts receivable, and liabilities are included in accrued
expenses in the consolidated statement of financial position.
The aggregate amount of costs incurred and profits recognized, net of recognized losses, for
construction contracts in progress since inception are EUR 970 million as of December 31, 2016 (EUR 670 million in 2015). For construction contracts acquired in 2016, the amount includes costs incurred and profits recognized from the
acquisition date.
8. Expenses by nature
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EURm |
|
2016 |
|
|
2015 |
|
|
2014 |
|
Continuing operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Personnel expenses (Note 9) |
|
|
7 814 |
|
|
|
3 738 |
|
|
|
3 381 |
|
Cost of material |
|
|
7 260 |
|
|
|
2 907 |
|
|
|
2 957 |
|
Depreciation and amortization (Notes 14, 15) |
|
|
1 594 |
|
|
|
286 |
|
|
|
240 |
|
Rental expenses |
|
|
344 |
|
|
|
164 |
|
|
|
154 |
|
Other |
|
|
7 818 |
|
|
|
3 943 |
|
|
|
3 734 |
|
Total operating
expenses |
|
|
24 830 |
|
|
|
11 038 |
|
|
|
10 466 |
|
Operating expenses include government grant income and R&D tax credits of EUR 126 million (EUR 20 million in 2015 and EUR
17 million in 2014) that have been recognized in the consolidated income statement as a deduction against research and development expenses.
|
|
|
NOKIA ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 20-F 2016 |
|
169 |
Notes to consolidated financial statements continued
9. Personnel expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EURm |
|
2016 |
|
|
2015 |
|
|
2014 |
|
Continuing operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Salaries and wages |
|
|
6 275 |
|
|
|
3 075 |
|
|
|
2 797 |
|
Share-based payment expense(1) |
|
|
130 |
|
|
|
67 |
|
|
|
53 |
|
Pension and other post-employment benefit expense,
net(2) |
|
|
458 |
|
|
|
223 |
|
|
|
189 |
|
Other social expenses |
|
|
951 |
|
|
|
373 |
|
|
|
342 |
|
Total |
|
|
7 814 |
|
|
|
3 738 |
|
|
|
3 381 |
|
(1) |
Includes EUR 119 million for equity-settled awards (EUR 43 million in 2015 and EUR 14 million in 2014). |
(2) |
Includes costs related to defined contribution plans of EUR 236 million (EUR 172 million in 2015 and EUR 144 million in 2014) and costs related to defined benefit plans of EUR 222 million
(EUR 51 million in 2015 and EUR 45 million in 2014). Refer to Note 27, Pensions and other post-employment benefits. |
The average
number of employees is 102 687 (56 690 in 2015 and 51 499 in 2014).
10. Other income and expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EURm |
|
2016 |
|
|
2015 |
|
|
2014 |
|
Continuing operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income from customer receivables and overdue payments |
|
|
29 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
23 |
|
VAT and other indirect tax refunds and social security credits |
|
|
19 |
|
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
Realized gains from unlisted venture funds |
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
144 |
|
|
|
18 |
|
Subsidies and government grants |
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
15 |
|
Profit on sale of property, plant and equipment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
15 |
|
Other |
|
|
44 |
|
|
|
57 |
|
|
|
40 |
|
Total |
|
|
116 |
|
|
|
236 |
|
|
|
118 |
|
Other expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restructuring, cost reduction and associated charges |
|
|
(759 |
) |
|
|
(120 |
) |
|
|
(61 |
) |
Valuation allowances for doubtful accounts and accounts receivable write-offs |
|
|
(116 |
) |
|
|
24 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
Expenses related to sale of receivables transactions |
|
|
(42 |
) |
|
|
(21 |
) |
|
|
(39 |
) |
Foreign exchange loss on hedging forecasted sales and purchases |
|
|
(26 |
) |
|
|
(22 |
) |
|
|
(15 |
) |
Impairment charges |
|
|
(17 |
) |
|
|
(11 |
) |
|
|
(13 |
) |
Losses and expenses related to unlisted venture funds |
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
(47 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Loss on sale of property, plant and equipment |
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
|
(12 |
) |
VAT and other indirect tax write-offs and provisions |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
(15 |
) |
Contractual remediation costs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
(31 |
) |
Other |
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
(23 |
) |
|
|
(48 |
) |
Total |
|
|
(949 |
) |
|
|
(223 |
) |
|
|
(229 |
) |
|
|
|
170 |
|
NOKIA ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 20-F 2016 |
11. Financial income and expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EURm |
|
2016 |
|
|
2015 |
|
|
2014 |
|
Continuing operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income on investments and loans receivable |
|
|
84 |
|
|
|
31 |
|
|
|
50 |
|
Net interest expense on derivatives not under hedge accounting |
|
|
(18 |
) |
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
(4 |
) |
Interest expense on financial liabilities carried at amortized cost(1) |
|
|
(234 |
) |
|
|
(135 |
) |
|
|
(387 |
) |
Net interest expense on defined benefit pensions (Note 27) |
|
|
(65 |
) |
|
|
(9 |
) |
|
|
(2 |
) |
Net realized gains on disposal of fixed income available-for-sale financial investments |
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
Net fair value (losses)/gains on investments at fair value through profit and loss |
|
|
(18 |
) |
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
20 |
|
Net gains/(losses) on other derivatives designated at fair value through profit and loss |
|
|
21 |
|
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
|
(20 |
) |
Net fair value gains/(losses) on hedged items under fair value hedge accounting |
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
(18 |
) |
Net fair value (losses)/gains on hedging instruments under fair value hedge accounting |
|
|
(15 |
) |
|
|
(12 |
) |
|
|
17 |
|
Net foreign exchange losses |
|
|
(9 |
) |
|
|
(76 |
) |
|
|
(61 |
) |
Other financial income(2) |
|
|
85 |
|
|
|
31 |
|
|
|
15 |
|
Other financial expenses(3) |
|
|
(144 |
) |
|
|
(14 |
) |
|
|
(14 |
) |
Total |
|
|
(287 |
) |
|
|
(186 |
) |
|
|
(403 |
) |
(1) |
In 2016, interest expense includes one-time charges of EUR 41 million, primarily related to the redemption of Alcatel-Lucent USA Inc. USD 650 million 4.625% notes due July 2017, USD 500 million 8.875%
notes due January 2020 and USD 700 million 6.750% notes due November 2020. In 2014, interest expense included a one-time non-cash charge of EUR 57 million relating to the repayment of the EUR 1.5 billion convertible bonds issued to
Microsoft when the Sale of the D&S Business was completed and one-time expenses of EUR 123 million relating to the redemption of materially all, then Nokia Networks borrowings. |
(2) |
Includes distributions of EUR 66 million (EUR 25 million in 2015 and EUR 14 million in 2014) from private venture funds held as non-current available-for-sale investments. |
(3) |
Includes impairments of EUR 108 million (EUR 2 million in 2014) related to private venture funds held as non-current available-for-sale investments. Refer to Note 16, Impairment. |
12. Income taxes
Components of the income tax benefit/(expense)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EURm |
|
2016 |
|
|
2015 |
|
|
2014 |
|
Continuing operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current tax |
|
|
(534 |
) |
|
|
(258 |
) |
|
|
(300 |
) |
Deferred tax |
|
|
991 |
|
|
|
(88 |
) |
|
|
2 019 |
|
Total |
|
|
457 |
|
|
|
(346 |
) |
|
|
1 719 |
|
Income tax reconciliation
Reconciliation
of the difference between income tax computed at the statutory rate in Finland of 20% and income tax recognized in the consolidated income statement:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EURm |
|
2016 |
|
|
2015 |
|
|
2014 |
|
Income tax benefit/(expense) at statutory rate |
|
|
274 |
|
|
|
(308 |
) |
|
|
(200 |
) |
Permanent differences |
|
|
31 |
|
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
(41 |
) |
Tax impact on operating model changes(1) |
|
|
439 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-creditable withholding taxes |
|
|
(42 |
) |
|
|
(17 |
) |
|
|
(31 |
) |
Income taxes for prior years |
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
(14 |
) |
Effect of different tax rates of subsidiaries operating in other jurisdictions |
|
|
88 |
|
|
|
(50 |
) |
|
|
(47 |
) |
Effect of deferred tax assets not
recognized(2) |
|
|
(318 |
) |
|
|
(35 |
) |
|
|
(26 |
) |
Benefit arising from previously unrecognized deferred tax assets(3) |
|
|
19 |
|
|
|
38 |
|
|
|
2 081 |
|
Net (increase)/decrease in uncertain tax positions |
|
|
(20 |
) |
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
Change in income tax rates |
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
Income taxes on undistributed earnings |
|
|
(23 |
) |
|
|
(7 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
(2 |
) |
Total |
|
|
457 |
|
|
|
(346 |
) |
|
|
1 719 |
|
(1) |
In 2016, following the completion of the Squeeze-Out of the remaining Alcatel Lucent Securities, the Group launched actions to integrate the former Alcatel Lucent and Nokia operating models. In connection with
these integration activities, the Group transferred certain intellectual property to its operations in the United States, recording a tax benefit and additional deferred tax assets of EUR 348 million. In addition, the Group elected to
treat the Acquisition of Alcatel Lucents operations in the United States as an asset purchase for United States tax purposes. The impact of this election was to utilize or forfeit existing deferred tax assets and record new deferred tax assets
with a longer amortization period than the life of those forfeited assets. As a result of this, EUR 91 million additional deferred tax assets were recorded in 2016. |
(2) |
In 2016, relates primarily to tax losses and temporary differences in France. |
(3) |
In 2014, relates primarily to tax losses, unused tax credits and temporary differences in Finland for which a deferred tax asset was re-recognized. |
|
|
|
NOKIA ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 20-F 2016 |
|
171 |
Notes to consolidated financial statements continued
Income tax liabilities and assets include a net EUR 495 million liability (EUR 394 million in 2015) relating to uncertain tax positions with inherently
uncertain timing of cash outflows.
Prior period income tax returns for certain Group companies are under examination by local tax authorities. The Group has
on-going tax audits in various jurisdictions, including India, Germany, Finland and Canada. The Groups business and investments, especially in emerging market countries, may be subject to uncertainties, including unfavorable or unpredictable
tax treatment. Management judgment and a degree of estimation are required in determining the tax expense or benefit. Even though management does not expect that any significant additional taxes in excess of those already provided for will
arise as a result of these examinations, the outcome or actual cost of settlement may vary materially from estimates.
In 2013, the tax authorities in India
commenced an investigation into withholding tax in respect of payments by Nokia India Private Limited to Nokia Corporation for the supply of operating software. Subsequently, the authorities extended the investigation to other related tax
consequences and issued orders and made certain assessments. The Group has denied all such allegations and continues defending itself in various Indian litigation proceedings, under both Indian and international law, while extending
its full cooperation to the authorities.
Through the Acquisition of Alcatel Lucent, the Group has an on-going tax audit in Germany relating to the disposal of
former Alcatel Lucent railway signaling business in 2006 to Thales. In the tax audit report issued in 2012, the tax authorities have claimed EUR 140 million before interest and penalties (being EUR 202 million including interest and
penalties as of December 31, 2016). The case is pending with the tax court of Baden-Wuerttemberg in Stuttgart, Germany. The Group has not recognized a liability for this on-going tax audit as it is considered more likely than not that the
Group will not have to pay these taxes.
Deferred tax assets and liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2016 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2015 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred |
|
|
Deferred |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred |
|
|
Deferred |
|
|
|
|
EURm |
|
tax assets |
|
|
tax liabilities |
|
|
Net balance |
|
|
|
|
|
tax assets |
|
|
tax liabilities |
|
|
Net balance |
|
Tax losses carried forward and unused tax credits |
|
|
1 428 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
916 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Undistributed earnings |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(67 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(15 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Intangible assets and property, plant and equipment |
|
|
3 713 |
|
|
|
(501 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 321 |
|
|
|
(154 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Defined benefit pension assets |
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
(1 334 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
(9 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Other non-current assets |
|
|
19 |
|
|
|
(52 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
(12 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Inventories |
|
|
154 |
|
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
85 |
|
|
|
(6 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Other current assets |
|
|
81 |
|
|
|
(66 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
43 |
|
|
|
(41 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Defined benefit pension and other post-retirement liabilities |
|
|
1 478 |
|
|
|
(29 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
154 |
|
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Other non-current liabilities |
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Provisions |
|
|
249 |
|
|
|
(6 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
106 |
|
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Other current liabilities |
|
|
307 |
|
|
|
(56 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
191 |
|
|
|
(33 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Other temporary differences |
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
(46 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
29 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total before
netting |
|
|
7 460 |
|
|
|
(2 162 |
) |
|
|
5 298 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 851 |
|
|
|
(278 |
) |
|
|
2 573 |
|
Netting of deferred tax assets and liabilities |
|
|
(1 759 |
) |
|
|
1 759 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(217 |
) |
|
|
217 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total after netting(1) |
|
|
5 701 |
|
|
|
(403 |
) |
|
|
5 298 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 634 |
|
|
|
(61 |
) |
|
|
2 573 |
|
(1) |
The increase, especially in deferred tax assets and liabilities relating to intangible assets and property, plant and equipment; and defined benefit pension assets and defined benefit pension and other post-retirement
liabilities, is primarily due to the Acquisition of Alcatel Lucent. |
Movements in the net deferred tax balance during the year:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EURm |
|
2016 |
|
|
2015 |
|
As of January 1 |
|
|
2 573 |
|
|
|
2 688 |
|
Recognized in income statement, Continuing operations |
|
|
991 |
|
|
|
(88 |
) |
Recognized in income statement, Discontinued operations |
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
147 |
|
Recognized in other comprehensive income |
|
|
(255 |
) |
|
|
(114 |
) |
Recognized in equity |
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
|
5 |
|
Acquisitions through business combinations and disposals |
|
|
1 914 |
|
|
|
(74 |
) |
Translation differences |
|
|
82 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
As of
December 31 |
|
|
5 298 |
|
|
|
2 573 |
|
|
|
|
172 |
|
NOKIA ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 20-F 2016 |
Amount of temporary differences, tax losses carried forward and tax credits for which no deferred tax asset was recognized due to uncertainty of utilization:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EURm |
|
2016 |
|
|
2015 |
|
Temporary differences |
|
|
2 214 |
|
|
|
334 |
|
Tax losses carried forward |
|
|
18 706 |
|
|
|
1 488 |
|
Tax credits |
|
|
32 |
|
|
|
21 |
|
Total(1) |
|
|
20 952 |
|
|
|
1 843 |
|
(1) |
In 2016, the increase is primarily due to the Acquisition of Alcatel Lucent. |
The majority of the unrecognized temporary
differences and tax losses relate to France. Based on the pattern of losses in the past years and in the absence of convincing other evidence of sufficient taxable profit in the future years, it is uncertain whether these deferred tax assets
can be utilized in the foreseeable future. A significant portion of the French unrecognized deferred tax assets are indefinite in nature and available against future French tax liabilities, subject to a limitation of 50% of annual taxable
profits.
The recognition of the remaining deferred tax assets is supported by offsetting deferred tax liabilities, earnings history and profit projections
in the relevant jurisdictions. As of December 31, 2016 the majority of recognized net deferred tax assets relate to unused tax losses, tax credits and deductible temporary differences in the United States of EUR 2.5 billion (EUR 0.1
billion in 2015) and Finland of EUR 2.2 billion (EUR 2.0 billion in 2015). Based on the recent years profitability in the United States and Finland, as well as the latest forecasts of future financial performance, the
Group has been able to establish a pattern of sufficient tax profitability in the United States and Finland to conclude that it is probable that it will be able to utilize the tax losses, tax credits and deductible temporary differences in the
foreseeable future. In 2016, the Group incurred an accounting loss in Finland due to significant integration and restructuring costs following the Acquisition of Alcatel Lucent, which may delay the utilization of these tax attributes in Finland.
Expiry of tax losses carried forward and unused tax credits:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2016 |
|
|
|
|
|
2015 |
|
EURm |
|
Recognized |
|
|
Unrecognized |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
Recognized |
|
|
Unrecognized |
|
|
Total |
|
Tax losses carried forward |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Within 10 years |
|
|
1 853 |
|
|
|
1 681 |
|
|
|
3 534 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 742 |
|
|
|
1 171 |
|
|
|
2 913 |
|
Thereafter |
|
|
79 |
|
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
96 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
174 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
174 |
|
No expiry |
|
|
1 878 |
|
|
|
17 008 |
|
|
|
18 886 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
280 |
|
|
|
317 |
|
|
|
597 |
|
Total |
|
|
3 810 |
|
|
|
18 706 |
|
|
|
22 516 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 196 |
|
|
|
1 488 |
|
|
|
3 684 |
|
Tax credits |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Within 10 years |
|
|
395 |
|
|
|
23 |
|
|
|
418 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
434 |
|
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
448 |
|
Thereafter |
|
|
94 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
94 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
42 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
42 |
|
No expiry |
|
|
66 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
75 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
Total |
|
|
555 |
|
|
|
32 |
|
|
|
587 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
476 |
|
|
|
21 |
|
|
|
497 |
|
The Group has undistributed earnings of EUR 1 074 million (EUR 769 million in 2015) for which a deferred tax
liability has not been recognized as these earnings will not be distributed in the foreseeable future.
|
|
|
NOKIA ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 20-F 2016 |
|
173 |
Notes to consolidated financial statements continued
13. Earnings per share
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2016 |
|
|
2015 |
|
|
2014 |
|
|
|
EURm |
|
|
EURm |
|
|
EURm |
|
Basic |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Loss)/profit for the year attributable to equity holders of the
parent |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Continuing operations |
|
|
(751 |
) |
|
|
1 192 |
|
|
|
2 710 |
|
Discontinued operations |
|
|
(15 |
) |
|
|
1 274 |
|
|
|
752 |
|
Total |
|
|
(766 |
) |
|
|
2 466 |
|
|
|
3 462 |
|
Diluted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effect of profit adjustments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Profit adjustment relating to Alcatel Lucent American Depositary Shares |
|
|
(8 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Elimination of interest expense, net of tax, on convertible bonds,
where dilutive |
|
|
|
|
|
|
36 |
|
|
|
60 |
|
Total effect of profit
adjustments |
|
|
(8 |
) |
|
|
36 |
|
|
|
60 |
|
(Loss)/profit attributable to equity holders of the parent adjusted for the effect
of dilution |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Continuing operations |
|
|
(759 |
) |
|
|
1 228 |
|
|
|
2 770 |
|
Discontinued operations |
|
|
(15 |
) |
|
|
1 274 |
|
|
|
752 |
|
Total |
|
|
(774 |
) |
|
|
2 502 |
|
|
|
3 522 |
|
|
|
000s shares |
|
|
000s shares |
|
|
000s shares |
|
Basic |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average number of shares in
issue |
|
|
5 732 371 |
|
|
|
3 670 934 |
|
|
|
3 698 723 |
|
Diluted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effect of dilutive shares |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effect of dilutive equity-based share incentive programs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restricted shares and other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4 253 |
|
|
|
14 419 |
|
Performance shares |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 179 |
|
|
|
1 327 |
|
Stock options |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 971 |
|
|
|
3 351 |
|
Total effect of dilutive equity-based share incentive
programs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
9 403 |
|
|
|
19 097 |
|
Effect of other dilutive shares |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Alcatel Lucent American Depositary Shares |
|
|
8 746 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assumed conversion of convertible bonds |
|
|
|
|
|
|
268 975 |
|
|
|
413 782 |
|
Total effect of other dilutive shares |
|
|
8 746 |
|
|
|
268 975 |
|
|
|
413 782 |
|
Total effect of dilutive
shares |
|
|
8 746 |
|
|
|
278 378 |
|
|
|
432 879 |
|
Adjusted weighted average number of
shares |
|
|
5 741 117 |
|
|
|
3 949 312 |
|
|
|
4 131 602 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings per share attributable to equity holders of the parent |
|
EUR |
|
|
EUR |
|
|
EUR |
|
Basic earnings per share |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Continuing operations |
|
|
(0.13 |
) |
|
|
0.32 |
|
|
|
0.73 |
|
Discontinued operations |
|
|
0.00 |
|
|
|
0.35 |
|
|
|
0.20 |
|
(Loss)/profit for the year |
|
|
(0.13 |
) |
|
|
0.67 |
|
|
|
0.94 |
|
Diluted earnings per share |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Continuing operations |
|
|
(0.13 |
) |
|
|
0.31 |
|
|
|
0.67 |
|
Discontinued operations |
|
|
0.00 |
|
|
|
0.32 |
|
|
|
0.18 |
|
(Loss)/profit for the year |
|
|
(0.13 |
) |
|
|
0.63 |
|
|
|
0.85 |
|
Basic earnings per share is calculated by dividing the profit/loss attributable to equity holders of the parent by the weighted average
number of shares outstanding during the year, excluding treasury shares. Diluted earnings per share is calculated by adjusting the profit/loss attributable to equity holders of the parent to eliminate the interest expense of dilutive
convertible bonds and other equity instruments; and by adjusting the weighted average number of shares outstanding with the dilutive effect of stock options, restricted shares and performance shares outstanding during the period as well as the
assumed conversion of convertible bonds and other equity instruments.
5 million restricted shares are outstanding (none in 2015 and 2014) that could
potentially have a dilutive impact in the future but are excluded from the calculation as they are determined to be anti-dilutive.
10 million performance
shares are outstanding (none in 2015 and 2014) that could potentially have a dilutive impact in the future but are excluded from the calculation as they are determined to be anti-dilutive. In addition, 4 million performance shares (4 million in
2015 and fewer than 1 million in 2014) have been excluded from the calculation of diluted shares as contingency conditions have not been met.
Stock options
equivalent to fewer than 1 million shares (fewer than 1 million shares in 2015 and 2 million in 2014) have been excluded from the calculation of diluted shares as they are determined to be anti-dilutive.
|
|
|
174 |
|
NOKIA ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 20-F 2016 |
In 2014, convertible bonds issued to Microsoft in September 2013 were fully redeemed as a result of the closing of the Sale of the D&S Business. 116 million
potential shares were included in the calculation of diluted shares to reflect the part-year effect of these convertible bonds.
In 2015, the Group exercised its
option to redeem the EUR 750 million convertible bonds at their original amount plus accrued interest. Virtually all bondholders elected to convert their convertible bonds into Nokia shares before redemption. 269 million potential shares
have been included in the calculation of diluted shares to reflect the part-year effect of these convertible bonds. In 2014, the conversion price was increased and 298 million potential shares were included in the calculation of diluted shares
as they were determined to be dilutive. Voluntary conversion of the entire bond would have resulted in the issue of 307 million shares in 2014.
On May 9,
2016, the Group acquired 107 775 949 Alcatel Lucent shares from JPMorgan Chase Bank N.A., as depositary, pursuant to the share purchase agreement announced on March 17, 2016. These shares represent Alcatel Lucent shares that remained in the
Alcatel Lucent American Depositary Receipts program after the cancellation period and following the programs termination on April 25, 2016. On May 10, 2016 the Group registered with the Finnish Trade Register 59 276 772 new Nokia
shares issued to the Alcatel depositary in settlement of the transaction. 9 million potential shares have been included in the calculation of diluted shares from March 16, 2016 to reflect the part-year effect of these shares, and were
included in the calculation as dilutive shares until the registration date.
14. Intangible assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EURm |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
Other |
|
|
Total |
|
Acquisition cost as of January 1, 2015 |
|
|
5 770 |
|
|
|
5 646 |
|
|
|
11 416 |
|
Translation differences |
|
|
350 |
|
|
|
382 |
|
|
|
732 |
|
Additions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
26 |
|
|
|
26 |
|
Acquisitions through business combinations |
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
56 |
|
|
|
63 |
|
Disposals and retirements(1) |
|
|
(4 982 |
) |
|
|
(2 973 |
) |
|
|
(7 955 |
) |
Acquisition cost as of December 31,
2015 |
|
|
1 145 |
|
|
|
3 137 |
|
|
|
4 282 |
|
Accumulated amortization and impairment charges as of January 1, 2015 |
|
|
(3 207 |
) |
|
|
(5 296 |
) |
|
|
(8 503 |
) |
Translation differences |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(350 |
) |
|
|
(350 |
) |
Disposals and retirements(1) |
|
|
2 299 |
|
|
|
2 934 |
|
|
|
5 233 |
|
Amortization |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(102 |
) |
|
|
(102 |
) |
Accumulated amortization and impairment
charges as of December 31, 2015 |
|
|
(908 |
) |
|
|
(2 814 |
) |
|
|
(3 722 |
) |
Net book value as of January 1, 2015 |
|
|
2 563 |
|
|
|
350 |
|
|
|
2 913 |
|
Net book value as of December 31,
2015 |
|
|
237 |
|
|
|
323 |
|
|
|
560 |
|
Acquisition cost as of January 1, 2016 |
|
|
1 145 |
|
|
|
3 137 |
|
|
|
4 282 |
|
Translation differences |
|
|
129 |
|
|
|
424 |
|
|
|
553 |
|
Additions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
62 |
|
|
|
62 |
|
Acquisitions through business combinations |
|
|
5 358 |
|
|
|
5 781 |
|
|
|
11 139 |
|
Disposals and retirements(2) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(22 |
) |
|
|
(22 |
) |
Acquisition cost as of December 31,
2016 |
|
|
6 632 |
|
|
|
9 382 |
|
|
|
16 014 |
|
Accumulated amortization and impairment charges as of January 1, 2016 |
|
|
(908 |
) |
|
|
(2 814 |
) |
|
|
(3 722 |
) |
Translation differences |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(325 |
) |
|
|
(325 |
) |
Disposals and retirements(2) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
Amortization |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1 016 |
) |
|
|
(1 016 |
) |
Accumulated amortization and impairment
charges as of December 31, 2016 |
|
|
(908 |
) |
|
|
(4 146 |
) |
|
|
(5 054 |
) |
Net book value as of January 1, 2016 |
|
|
237 |
|
|
|
323 |
|
|
|
560 |
|
Net book value as of December 31,
2016 |
|
|
5 724 |
|
|
|
5 236 |
|
|
|
10 960 |
|
(1) |
Included goodwill with acquisition cost of EUR 4 982 million and accumulated impairment of EUR 2 299 million and other intangible assets with acquisition cost of EUR 2 892 million and accumulated
amortization of EUR 2 853 million disposed as part of the Sale of the HERE Business. |
(2) |
Includes impairment charges of EUR 9 million. Refer to Note 16, Impairment. |
Net book value of other intangible assets
by type of asset:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EURm |
|
2016 |
|
|
2015 |
|
Customer relationships |
|
|
2 765 |
|
|
|
132 |
|
Technologies |
|
|
1 786 |
|
|
|
126 |
|
Tradenames and trademarks |
|
|
308 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
Other |
|
|
377 |
|
|
|
56 |
|
Total |
|
|
5 236 |
|
|
|
323 |
|
The remaining amortization periods are approximately one to nine years for customer relationships, one to seven years for developed
technology and five to seven years for tradenames and trademarks.
|
|
|
NOKIA ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 20-F 2016 |
|
175 |
Notes to consolidated financial statements continued
15. Property, plant and equipment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Buildings and |
|
|
Machinery and |
|
|
|
|
|
Assets under |
|
|
|
|
EURm |
|
constructions |
|
|
equipment |
|
|
Other |
|
|
construction |
|
|
Total |
|
Acquisition cost as of January 1, 2015 |
|
|
438 |
|
|
|
1 854 |
|
|
|
41 |
|
|
|
19 |
|
|
|
2 352 |
|
Translation differences |
|
|
32 |
|
|
|
134 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
167 |
|
Additions |
|
|
62 |
|
|
|
186 |
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
279 |
|
Acquisitions through business combinations |
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7 |
|
Reclassifications |
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(16 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Disposals and retirements(1) |
|
|
(119 |
) |
|
|
(437 |
) |
|
|
(16 |
) |
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
(576 |
) |
Acquisition cost as of
December 31, 2015 |
|
|
427 |
|
|
|
1 746 |
|
|
|
41 |
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
2 229 |
|
Accumulated depreciation as of January 1, 2015 |
|
|
(180 |
) |
|
|
(1 434 |
) |
|
|
(22 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1 636 |
) |
Translation differences |
|
|
(18 |
) |
|
|
(114 |
) |
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(133 |
) |
Disposals and retirements(1) |
|
|
71 |
|
|
|
365 |
|
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
452 |
|
Depreciation |
|
|
(47 |
) |
|
|
(168 |
) |
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(217 |
) |
Accumulated depreciation as of
December 31, 2015 |
|
|
(174 |
) |
|
|
(1 351 |
) |
|
|
(9 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1 534 |
) |
Net book value as of January 1, 2015 |
|
|
258 |
|
|
|
420 |
|
|
|
19 |
|
|
|
19 |
|
|
|
716 |
|
Net book value as of December 31,
2015 |
|
|
253 |
|
|
|
395 |
|
|
|
32 |
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
695 |
|
Acquisition cost as of January 1, 2016 |
|
|
427 |
|
|
|
1 746 |
|
|
|
41 |
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
2 229 |
|
Transfers to assets held for sale |
|
|
(47 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(47 |
) |
Translation differences |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
(15 |
) |
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(12 |
) |
Additions |
|
|
65 |
|
|
|
361 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
87 |
|
|
|
516 |
|
Acquisitions through business combinations |
|
|
587 |
|
|
|
674 |
|
|
|
68 |
|
|
|
84 |
|
|
|
1 413 |
|
Reclassifications |
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
75 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
(97 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Disposals and retirements |
|
|
(54 |
) |
|
|
(148 |
) |
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(204 |
) |
Acquisition cost as of
December 31, 2016 |
|
|
999 |
|
|
|
2 693 |
|
|
|
114 |
|
|
|
89 |
|
|
|
3 895 |
|
Accumulated depreciation as of January 1, 2016 |
|
|
(174 |
) |
|
|
(1 351 |
) |
|
|
(9 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1 534 |
) |
Transfers to assets held for sale |
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
|
Translation differences |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14 |
|
Disposals and retirements |
|
|
46 |
|
|
|
133 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
179 |
|
Depreciation |
|
|
(94 |
) |
|
|
(480 |
) |
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(578 |
) |
Accumulated depreciation as of
December 31, 2016 |
|
|
(216 |
) |
|
|
(1 685 |
) |
|
|
(13 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1 914 |
) |
Net book value as of January 1, 2016 |
|
|
253 |
|
|
|
395 |
|
|
|
32 |
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
695 |
|
Net book value as of December 31,
2016 |
|
|
783 |
|
|
|
1 008 |
|
|
|
101 |
|
|
|
89 |
|
|
|
1 981 |
|
(1) |
Included buildings and constructions with acquisition cost of EUR 81 million and accumulated depreciation of EUR 35 million, machinery and equipment with acquisition cost of EUR 305 million and
accumulated depreciation of EUR 239 million and assets under construction with acquisition cost of EUR 3 million disposed as part of the Sale of the HERE Business. |
In 2014, the tax authorities in India placed a lien which prohibited the Group from transferring the mobile devices-related facility in Chennai to Microsoft as
part of the Sale of the D&S Business.
|
|
|
176 |
|
NOKIA ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 20-F 2016 |
16. Impairment
Goodwill
Following the Acquisition of Alcatel Lucent on January 4, 2016, the Group adopted an operational and reporting structure consisting
of two businesses: Nokias Networks business and Nokia Technologies, and three reportable segments for financial reporting purposes: Ultra Broadband Networks and IP Networks and Applications within Nokias Networks business,
and Nokia Technologies. Based on the current operational and reporting structure, the Group allocated goodwill to the operating segments within Nokias Networks business and to the Withings cash generating unit within Nokia Technologies
corresponding to groups of cash generating units (group of CGUs) and cash generating unit (CGU), respectively. The goodwill allocation reflects the lowest level at which goodwill is monitored for internal management purposes;
and is allocated to the group of CGUs or the CGU that is expected to benefit from the synergies of the combination.
Allocation of goodwill
The following table presents the allocation of goodwill to groups of CGUs and the CGU as of the annual impairment testing date October 1, 2016:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EURm |
|
2016 |
|
|
2015 |
|
Mobile Networks |
|
|
2 298 |
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed Networks |
|
|
896 |
|
|
|
|
|
IP/Optical Networks |
|
|
1 970 |
|
|
|
|
|
Applications & Analytics |
|
|
240 |
|
|
|
|
|
Withings (Nokia Technologies) |
|
|
141 |
|
|
|
|
|
Global Services |
|
|
|
|
|
|
124 |
|
Radio Access Networks (Mobile Broadband) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
115 |
|
Recoverable amounts
The recoverable amounts of the groups of CGUs and the CGU were based on fair value less costs of disposal that was determined using a level 3 fair value measurement
based on a discounted cash flow calculation. The cash flow projections used in calculating the recoverable amounts were based on financial plans approved by management covering an explicit forecast period of five years.
Five additional years of cash flow projections subsequent to the explicit forecast period reflect a gradual progression towards the steady state cash flow projections
modeled in the terminal year. The terminal growth rate assumptions reflect long-term average growth rates for the industry and economies in which the groups of CGUs and the CGU operate. The discount rates reflect current assessments of the time
value of money and relevant market risk premiums reflecting risks and uncertainties for which the future cash flow estimates have not been adjusted. Other key variables in future cash flow projections include assumptions on estimated sales growth,
gross margin and operating margin. All cash flow projections are consistent with external sources of information, wherever possible.
The key assumptions applied in
the impairment testing analysis for the groups of CGUs and the CGU:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2016 |
|
|
2015 |
|
|
|
|
2016 |
|
2015 |
|
Key assumption % |
|
Terminal growth rate |
|
|
|
|
Post-tax discount
rate |
|
Mobile Networks |
|
|
0.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
9.2 |
|
|
|
|
Fixed Networks |
|
|
0.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
8.6 |
|
|
|
|
IP/Optical Networks |
|
|
1.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
8.9 |
|
|
|
|
Applications & Analytics |
|
|
1.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
9.0 |
|
|
|
|
Withings (Nokia Technologies) |
|
|
2.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
12.7 |
|
|
|
|
Global Services |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
8.7 |
|
Radio Access Networks (Mobile Broadband) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
9.2 |
|
|
|
|
NOKIA ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 20-F 2016 |
|
177 |
Notes to consolidated financial statements continued
Sensitivity analysis
The Group allocated a
significant proportion of the goodwill arising from the Acquisition of Alcatel Lucent to the IP/Optical Networks group of CGUs, which is comprised mainly of businesses acquired in the acquisition. As a result, the fair value of the IP/Optical
Networks group of CGUs corresponds closely to its respective carrying amount.
The results of the impairment testing indicate significant headroom for each group of
CGUs and CGU, except for the IP/Optical Networks group of CGUs, where the recoverable amount exceeds its carrying amount by approximately EUR 1 200 million. Taken in isolation, the following changes would cause the recoverable amount of IP/Optical
Networks group of CGUs to equal its carrying amount:
∎ |
|
Increase in discount rate from 8.9% to 10.7%. |
∎ |
|
Reduction in operational profitability in the terminal year by 40%, which is equal to the decrease in the operating profit of EUR 331 million. |
Other non-current assets
Impairment charges by asset category:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EURm |
|
2016 |
|
|
2015 |
|
|
2014 |
|
Other intangible assets |
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Available-for-sale investments |
|
|
116 |
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
15 |
|
Total |
|
|
125 |
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
15 |
|
Other intangible assets
The Group recognized an impairment charge of EUR 9 million following the discontinuation of certain technology-related assets acquired with Mesaplexx Pty Ltd. The
impairment charge is recorded in other operating expenses.
Available-for-sale investments
The Group recognized an impairment charge of EUR 116 million (EUR 11 million in 2015 and EUR 15 million in 2014) primarily related to the performance of
certain private funds investing in IPR that are included in non-current available-for-sale equity investments at cost less impairment. These charges are recorded in other expenses and financial income and expenses.
17. Inventories
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EURm |
|
2016 |
|
|
2015 |
|
Raw materials, supplies and other |
|
|
268 |
|
|
|
102 |
|
Work in progress |
|
|
1 159 |
|
|
|
404 |
|
Finished goods |
|
|
1 079 |
|
|
|
508 |
|
Total |
|
|
2 506 |
|
|
|
1 014 |
|
The cost of inventories recognized as an expense during the year and included in the cost of sales is EUR 7 636 million (EUR 3
132 million in 2015 and EUR 3 156 million in 2014).
Movements in allowances for excess and obsolete inventory for the years ended December 31:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EURm |
|
2016 |
|
|
2015 |
|
|
2014 |
|
As of January 1 |
|
|
195 |
|
|
|
204 |
|
|
|
178 |
|
Charged to income statement |
|
|
354 |
|
|
|
71 |
|
|
|
107 |
|
Deductions(1) |
|
|
(93 |
) |
|
|
(80 |
) |
|
|
(81 |
) |
As of December 31 |
|
|
456 |
|
|
|
195 |
|
|
|
204 |
|
(1) |
Deductions include utilization and releases of allowances. |
|
|
|
178 |
|
NOKIA ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 20-F 2016 |
18. Allowances for doubtful accounts
Movements in allowances for doubtful accounts for the years ended December 31:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EURm |
|
2016 |
|
|
2015 |
|
|
2014 |
|
As of January 1 |
|
|
62 |
|
|
|
103 |
|
|
|
124 |
|
Transfer to Discontinued operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Charged to income statement |
|
|
126 |
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
24 |
|
Deductions(1) |
|
|
(20 |
) |
|
|
(47 |
) |
|
|
(45 |
) |
As of
December 31 |
|
|
168 |
|
|
|
62 |
|
|
|
103 |
|
(1) |
Deductions include utilization and releases of allowances. |
19. Prepaid
expenses and accrued income
Non-current assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EURm |
|
2016 |
|
|
2015 |
|
R&D tax credits and other indirect tax receivables |
|
|
254 |
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
74 |
|
|
|
51 |
|
Total |
|
|
328 |
|
|
|
51 |
|
|
|
|
Current assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EURm |
|
2016 |
|
|
2015 |
|
Social security, R&D tax credits, VAT and other indirect taxes |
|
|
560 |
|
|
|
258 |
|
Deposits |
|
|
118 |
|
|
|
83 |
|
Accrued revenue |
|
|
101 |
|
|
|
21 |
|
Divestment-related receivables |
|
|
90 |
|
|
|
160 |
|
Other |
|
|
427 |
|
|
|
227 |
|
Total |
|
|
1 296 |
|
|
|
749 |
|
|
|
|
NOKIA ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 20-F 2016 |
|
179 |
Notes to consolidated financial statements continued
20. Shares of the Parent Company
Shares and share capital
Nokia Corporation (Parent Company) has
one class of shares. Each share entitles the holder to one vote at General Meetings. As of December 31, 2016, the share capital of Nokia Corporation is EUR 245 896 461.96 and the total number of shares issued is 5 836 055 012. As of
December 31, 2016, the total number of shares includes 115 551 878 shares owned by Group companies representing 2.0% of share capital and total voting rights. Under the Nokia Articles of Association, Nokia Corporation does not have minimum or
maximum share capital or share par value.
Authorizations
Authorization to issue shares and special rights entitling to shares
At the Annual General Meeting held on May 5, 2015, the
shareholders authorized the Board of Directors to issue a maximum of 730 million shares through one or more issues of shares or special rights entitling to shares. The Board of Directors was authorized to issue either new shares or shares held
by the Parent Company. The authorization included the right for the Board of Directors to resolve on all the terms and conditions of such share and special rights issuances, including issuance in deviation from the shareholders
pre-emptive rights. The authorization may be used to develop the Parent Companys capital structure, diversify the shareholder base, finance or carry out acquisitions or other arrangements, settle the Parent Companys equity-based
incentive plans, or for other purposes resolved by the Board of Directors. The authorization that would have been effective until November 5, 2016 was terminated by a resolution of Annual General Meeting on June 16, 2016.
At the Extraordinary General Meeting held on December 2, 2015, the shareholders authorized the Board of Directors to issue, in deviation from the
shareholders pre-emptive right, a maximum of 2 100 million shares through one or more share issues. The authorization includes the right for the Board of Directors to resolve on all the terms and conditions of such share issuances.
The authorization may be used to issue Parent Company shares to the holders of Alcatel Lucent shares, American Depositary Shares and convertible bonds as well as to beneficiaries of Alcatel Lucent employee equity compensation arrangements for
the purpose of implementing the transaction with Alcatel Lucent, including the consummation of the public exchange offers made to Alcatel Lucent shareholders as well as other transactions contemplated by the memorandum of understanding between the
Group and Alcatel Lucent, and/or otherwise to effect the combination. The authorization is effective until December 2, 2020.
In 2016, under the authorization
held by the Board of Directors, the Parent Company issued in deviation from the shareholders pre-emptive right to subscription 1 842 158 031 shares in exchange for the Alcatel Lucent ordinary shares, American Depository Shares and OCEANE
convertible bonds to effect the business combination with Alcatel Lucent. The number of shares issued consisted of 1 831 136 063 new shares and 11 021 968 shares held by Group companies. On November 2, 2016 the Group reached 100% ownership of
Alcatel Lucent. Refer to Note 5, Acquisitions.
At the Annual General Meeting held on June 16, 2016, the shareholders authorized the Board of Directors to
issue a maximum of 1 150 million shares through one or more issues of shares or special rights entitling to shares. The Board of Directors is authorized to issue either new shares or shares held by the Parent Company. The authorization included
the right for the Board of Directors to resolve on all the terms and conditions of such share and special rights issuances, including issuance in deviation from the shareholders pre-emptive rights. The authorization may be used to develop the
Parent Companys capital structure, diversify the shareholder base, finance or carry out acquisitions or other arrangements, settle the Parent Companys equity-based incentive plans, or for other purposes resolved by the Board of
Directors. The authorization is effective until December 16, 2017.
In 2016, under the authorization held by the Board of Directors, the Parent Company issued
3 408 437 treasury shares to employees, including certain members of the Group Leadership Team, as settlement under equity-based incentive plans. The shares were issued without consideration and in accordance with the Plan rules.
In 2016, the Parent Company issued 1 033 265 new shares following the holders of stock options issued in 2011 and 2012 exercising their option rights.
As of December 31, 2016, the Board of Directors had no other authorizations to issue shares, convertible bonds, warrants or stock options.
Other authorizations
At the Annual General
Meeting held on May 5, 2015, the shareholders authorized the Board of Directors to repurchase a maximum of 365 million shares. The amount corresponded to less than 10% of the total number of Parent Companys shares. The shares may be
repurchased in order to optimize the capital structure of the Parent Company, in order to finance or carry out acquisitions or other arrangements, to settle the Parent Companys equity-based incentive plans or to be transferred for other
purposes. The authorization that would have been effective until November 5, 2016 was terminated by a resolution of the Annual General Meeting on June 16, 2016.
At the Annual General Meeting held on June 16, 2016, the shareholders authorized the Board of Directors to repurchase a maximum of 575 million shares. The
amount corresponds to less than 10% of the total number of Parent Companys shares. The shares may be repurchased in order to optimize the capital structure of the Parent Company and are expected to be cancelled. In addition, the shares may be
repurchased in order to finance or carry out acquisitions or other arrangements, to settle the Parent Companys equity-based incentive plans or to be transferred for other purposes. The authorization is effective until December 16, 2017.
In 2016, under the authorization held by the Board of Directors and in line with the capital structure optimization program, the Parent Company repurchased 54 296
182 shares representing approximately 0.9% of share capital and total voting rights. The price paid for the shares was based on the current market price of the Nokia share on the securities market at the time of the repurchase.
|
|
|
180 |
|
NOKIA ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 20-F 2016 |
21. Fair value and other reserves
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EURm |
|
Translation
differences |
|
|
Pension
remeasurements |
|
|
Hedging reserve |
|
|
Available-for-sale Investments |
|
As of January 1,
2014 |
|
|
434 |
|
|
|
(131 |
) |
|
|
30 |
|
|
|
181 |
|
Foreign exchange translation differences |
|
|
628 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net investment hedging losses |
|
|
(153 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Remeasurements of defined benefit plans |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(179 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net fair value (losses)/gains |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(10 |
) |
|
|
117 |
|
Transfer to income statement |
|
|
197 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(20 |
) |
|
|
(14 |
) |
Disposal of businesses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
46 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
Movement attributable to non-controlling interests |
|
|
(7 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31,
2014 |
|
|
1 099 |
|
|
|
(264 |
) |
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
284 |
|
Foreign exchange translation differences |
|
|
672 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net investment hedging losses |
|
|
(207 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Remeasurements of defined benefit plans |
|
|
|
|
|
|
84 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net fair value (losses)/gains |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(53 |
) |
|
|
225 |
|
Transfer to income statement |
|
|
(1 268 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
49 |
|
|
|
(131 |
) |
Disposal of businesses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Movement attributable to non-controlling interests |
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31,
2015 |
|
|
292 |
|
|
|
(172 |
) |
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
378 |
|
Foreign exchange translation differences |
|
|
265 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net investment hedging losses |
|
|
(83 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Remeasurements of defined benefit plans |
|
|
|
|
|
|
343 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net fair value losses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(13 |
) |
|
|
(10 |
) |
Transfer to income statement |
|
|
(14 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
25 |
|
|
|
(63 |
) |
Acquisition of non-controlling interests |
|
|
(15 |
) |
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Movement attributable to non-controlling interests |
|
|
38 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31,
2016 |
|
|
483 |
|
|
|
173 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
305 |
|
Translation differences consist of translation differences arising from translation of foreign Group companies assets and
liabilities into euro, the presentation currency of the consolidated financial statements, as well as gains and losses related to hedging of net investments in foreign operations. On disposal of all or a part of a foreign Group company, the
cumulative amount of translation differences and related accumulated changes in fair value of qualifying net investment hedges are recognized as income or expense on the consolidated income statement when the gain or loss on disposal is
recognized. Refer to Note 2, Significant accounting policies.
The Group has defined benefit plans. Actuarial gains and losses arising from experience adjustments
and changes in actuarial assumptions for these defined benefit plans are charged or credited to the pension remeasurements reserve. Refer to Note 2, Significant accounting policies and Note 27, Pensions and other post-employment benefits.
The Group applies hedge accounting on certain forward foreign exchange contracts that are designated as cash flow hedges. The change in fair value that
reflects the change in spot exchange rates is deferred to the hedging reserve to the extent that the hedge is effective. Refer to Note 2, Significant accounting policies.
The Group invests a portion of cash needed to cover the projected cash needs of its ongoing business operations in highly liquid, interest-bearing investments and
certain equity instruments. Changes in the fair value of these available-for-sale investments are recognized in the fair value and other reserves as part of other comprehensive income, with the exception of interest calculated using the
effective interest method and foreign exchange gains and losses on current available-for-sale investments recognized directly in the consolidated income statement. Refer to Note 2, Significant accounting policies.
|
|
|
NOKIA ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 20-F 2016 |
|
181 |
Notes to consolidated financial statements continued
22. Other comprehensive income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2016 |
|
|
|
|
|
2015 |
|
|
|
|
|
2014 |
|
EURm |
|
Gross |
|
|
Tax |
|
|
Net |
|
|
|
|
|
Gross |
|
|
Tax |
|
|
Net |
|
|
|
|
|
Gross |
|
|
Tax |
|
|
Net |
|
Pension remeasurements |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Remeasurements of defined benefit plans |
|
|
613 |
|
|
|
(269 |
) |
|
|
344 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
112 |
|
|
|
(28 |
) |
|
|
84 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(275 |
) |
|
|
96 |
|
|
|
(179 |
) |
Net change during the year |
|
|
613 |
|
|
|
(269 |
) |
|
|
344 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
112 |
|
|
|
(28 |
) |
|
|
84 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(275 |
) |
|
|
96 |
|
|
|
(179 |
) |
Translation differences |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exchange differences on translating foreign operations |
|
|
265 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
265 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
673 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
673 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
628 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
628 |
|
Transfer to income statement |
|
|
(14 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(14 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1 727 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1 727 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
192 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
192 |
|
Net change during the year |
|
|
251 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
251 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1 054 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1 054 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
820 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
820 |
|
Net investment hedging |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net investment hedging losses |
|
|
(103 |
) |
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
(83 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(260 |
) |
|
|
53 |
|
|
|
(207 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(187 |
) |
|
|
34 |
|
|
|
(153 |
) |
Transfer to income statement |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
582 |
|
|
|
(123 |
) |
|
|
459 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
(15 |
) |
|
|
5 |
|
Net change during the year |
|
|
(103 |
) |
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
(83 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
322 |
|
|
|
(70 |
) |
|
|
252 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(167 |
) |
|
|
19 |
|
|
|
(148 |
) |
Cash flow hedges |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net fair value losses |
|
|
(16 |
) |
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
(13 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(66 |
) |
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
(53 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
|
(10 |
) |
Transfer to income statement |
|
|
30 |
|
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
|
25 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
61 |
|
|
|
(12 |
) |
|
|
49 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(25 |
) |
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
(20 |
) |
Net change during the year |
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(30 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(30 |
) |
Available-for-sale Investments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net fair value (losses)/gains |
|
|
(9 |
) |
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
(10 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
246 |
|
|
|
(21 |
) |
|
|
225 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
120 |
|
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
117 |
|
Transfer to income statement on impairment |
|
|
25 |
|
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
21 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15 |
|
Transfer to income statement on disposal |
|
|
(91 |
) |
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
(84 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(144 |
) |
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
(142 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(29 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(29 |
) |
Net change during the year |
|
|
(75 |
) |
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
(73 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
113 |
|
|
|
(19 |
) |
|
|
94 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
106 |
|
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
103 |
|
Other (decrease)/increase, net |
|
|
(6 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
40 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
40 |
|
Total |
|
|
694 |
|
|
|
(249 |
) |
|
|
445 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(510 |
) |
|
|
(116 |
) |
|
|
(626 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
494 |
|
|
|
112 |
|
|
|
606 |
|
|
|
|
182 |
|
NOKIA ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 20-F 2016 |
23. Interest-bearing liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Carrying amount EURm |
Issuer/borrower |
|
Instrument |
|
Currency |
|
Nominal (million) |
|
|
Final maturity |
|
|
|
2016 |
|
2015 |
Nokia Corporation |
|
Revolving Credit Facility(1) |
|
EUR |
|
|
1 579 |
|
|
June 2019 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nokia Corporation |
|
6.625% Senior Notes |
|
USD |
|
|
500 |
|
|
May 2039 |
|
|
|
482 |
|
467 |
Alcatel-Lucent USA Inc. |
|
6.45% Senior Notes |
|
USD |
|
|
1 360 |
|
|
March 2029 |
|
|
|
1 306 |
|
|
Alcatel-Lucent USA Inc. |
|
6.5% Senior Notes |
|
USD |
|
|
300 |
|
|
January 2028 |
|
|
|
287 |
|
|
Alcatel Lucent SA |
|
0.125% OCEANE Convertible Bond |
|
EUR |
|
|
|
|
|
January 2020 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nokia Corporation |
|
5.375% Senior Notes |
|
USD |
|
|
1 000 |
|
|
May 2019 |
|
|
|
961 |
|
940 |
Nokia Corporation |
|
6.75% Senior Notes |
|
EUR |
|
|
500 |
|
|
February 2019 |
|
|
|
527 |
|
539 |
Alcatel Lucent SA |
|
0% OCEANE Convertible Bond |
|
EUR |
|
|
|
|
|
January 2019 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nokia Corporation and various subsidiaries |
|
Other liabilities(2) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
464 |
|
128 |
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4 027 |
|
2 074 |
(1) |
In June 2016, the Group exercised its option to increase the size of the EUR 1 500 million revolving credit facility to EUR 1 579 million and to extend the maturity date from June 2018 to June 2019.
The facility has a remaining one-year extension option, no financial covenants and remains undrawn. |
(2) |
Includes liabilities related to the French R&D tax credits (Crédits dImpôt Recherche) of EUR 132 million that have been sold to banks on a recourse basis and hence remain on the consolidated
statement of financial position. |
Transactions relating to borrowings acquired as part of the Acquisition of Alcatel Lucent
As part of the public exchange offer to acquire Alcatel Lucent 2018 OCEANE, 2019 OCEANE and 2020 OCEANE convertible bonds with nominal amounts of EUR 381 million,
EUR 238 million and EUR 293 million respectively, were tendered for exchange into Nokia shares. As a result, less than 15% of the 2018 OCEANE convertible bonds remained outstanding, and the Group caused Alcatel Lucent SA to redeem at par
value plus accrued interest, all of the outstanding 2018 OCEANE convertible bonds pursuant to the terms and conditions of the bonds. Subsequently during 2016 the remaining outstanding 2019 OCEANE and 2020 OCEANE convertible bonds with nominal
amounts EUR 402 million and EUR 136 million respectively, were either put back, acquired in privately negotiated transactions, or acquired through the Public Buy-Out Offer followed by a Squeeze-Out for an aggregate cash payment of
EUR 562 million. Refer to Note 5, Acquisitions.
In January 2016, Alcatel Lucent SA repaid its EUR 190 million 8.50% senior notes. In February, 2016,
Alcatel-Lucent USA Inc. redeemed its USD 650 million 4.625% notes due July 2017, USD 500 million 8.875% notes due January 2020 and USD 700 million 6.750% notes due November 2020 in accordance with their respective terms and
conditions. In February 2016, Alcatel Lucent SA terminated its EUR 504 million revolving credit facility. In March 2016, the Alcatel-Lucent Submarine Networks credit facility of EUR 74 million was repaid.
All of the remaining borrowings are senior unsecured and have no financial covenants.
|
|
|
NOKIA ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 20-F 2016 |
|
183 |
Notes to consolidated financial statements continued
24. Fair value of financial instruments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Carrying amounts |
|
|
|
|
|
Fair
value(1) |
|
EURm |
|
Current available- for-sale financial
assets |
|
|
Non-current available- for-sale financial
assets |
|
|
Financial instruments at fair value through profit or loss |
|
|
Loans and receivables measured at amortized cost |
|
|
Financial liabilities measured at amortized cost |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
2016 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Available-for-sale investments, carried at fair value |
|
|
|
|
|
|
838 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
838 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
838 |
|
Available-for-sale investments, carried at cost less impairment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
202 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
202 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
202 |
|
Other non-current financial assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
111 |
|
|
|
143 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
254 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
228 |
|
Accounts receivable |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6 972 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6 972 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6 972 |
|
Other current financial assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
235 |
|
|
|
61 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
296 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
296 |
|
Investments at fair value through profit and loss, liquid assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
327 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
327 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
327 |
|
Available-for-sale investments, liquid assets carried at fair value |
|
|
1 502 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 502 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 502 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents carried at fair value |
|
|
7 497 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7 497 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7 497 |
|
Total financial
assets |
|
|
8 999 |
|
|
|
1 040 |
|
|
|
673 |
|
|
|
7 176 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17 888 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17 862 |
|
Long-term interest-bearing liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 657 |
|
|
|
3 657 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 821 |
|
Short-term interest-bearing liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
370 |
|
|
|
370 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
370 |
|
Other financial liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
250 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
34 |
|
|
|
284 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
284 |
|
Accounts payable |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 781 |
|
|
|
3 781 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 781 |
|
Total financial
liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
250 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7 842 |
|
|
|
8 092 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8 256 |
|
2015 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Available-for-sale investments, carried at fair value |
|
|
|
|
|
|
703 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
703 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
703 |
|
Available-for-sale investments, carried at cost less impairment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
285 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
285 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
285 |
|
Other non-current financial assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
49 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
49 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
39 |
|
Accounts receivable |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 913 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 913 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 913 |
|
Other current financial assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
96 |
|
|
|
32 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
128 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
128 |
|
Investments at fair value through profit and loss, liquid assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
687 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
687 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
687 |
|
Available-for-sale investments, publicly quoted equity shares |
|
|
|
|
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16 |
|
Available-for-sale investments, liquid assets carried at fair value |
|
|
2 167 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 167 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 167 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents carried at fair value |
|
|
6 995 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6 995 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6 995 |
|
Total financial
assets |
|
|
9 162 |
|
|
|
1 004 |
|
|
|
783 |
|
|
|
3 994 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14 943 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14 933 |
|
Long-term interest-bearing liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 023 |
|
|
|
2 023 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 100 |
|
Short-term interest-bearing liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
51 |
|
|
|
51 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
51 |
|
Other financial liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
114 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
122 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
122 |
|
Accounts payable |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 910 |
|
|
|
1 910 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 910 |
|
Total financial
liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
114 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 992 |
|
|
|
4 106 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4 183 |
|
(1) |
The following fair value measurement methods are used for items not carried at fair value: the fair value is estimated to equal the carrying amount for available-for-sale investments carried at cost less impairment for
which it is not possible to estimate fair value reliably. These assets are tested for impairment using a discounted cash flow analysis if events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amounts may not be recoverable. The fair values
of long-term interest-bearing liabilities are primarily based on quotes from third-party pricing services (level 2). The fair values of other assets and liabilities, including loans receivable and loans payable are primarily based on discounted cash
flow analysis (level 2). The fair value is estimated to equal the carrying amount for short-term financial assets and financial liabilities due to limited credit risk and short time to maturity. Refer to Note 2, Significant accounting policies.
|
|
|
|
184 |
|
NOKIA ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 20-F 2016 |
Fair value hierarchy
Financial assets and liabilities recorded at fair
value are categorized based on the amount of unobservable inputs used to measure their fair value. Three hierarchical levels are based on an increasing amount of judgment associated with the inputs used to derive fair valuation for these assets and
liabilities, level 1 being market values for exchange traded products, level 2 being primarily based on quotes from third-party pricing services, and level 3 requiring most management judgment. At the end of each reporting period, the Group
categorizes its financial assets and liabilities to appropriate level of fair value hierarchy.
Items measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of
December 31:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EURm |
|
Instruments with quoted prices in active markets (level
1) |
|
|
Valuation technique using
observable data (level 2) |
|
|
Valuation technique
using non-observable data (level 3) |
|
|
Total |
|
2016 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Available-for-sale investments, carried at fair value |
|
|
|
|
|
|
164 |
|
|
|
674 |
|
|
|
838 |
|
Other current financial assets,
derivatives(1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
235 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
235 |
|
Investments at fair value through profit and loss |
|
|
|
|
|
|
438 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
438 |
|
Available-for-sale investments, liquid assets carried at fair
value |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 502 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 502 |
|
Total assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 339 |
|
|
|
674 |
|
|
|
3 013 |
|
Other financial liabilities, derivatives(1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
236 |
|
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
250 |
|
Total liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
236 |
|
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
250 |
|
2015 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Available-for-sale investments, carried at fair value |
|
|
|
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
688 |
|
|
|
703 |
|
Other current financial assets,
derivatives(1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
96 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
96 |
|
Investments at fair value through profit and loss |
|
|
|
|
|
|
687 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
687 |
|
Available-for-sale investments, publicly quoted equity shares |
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16 |
|
Available-for-sale investments, liquid assets carried at fair
value |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 167 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 167 |
|
Total assets |
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
2 965 |
|
|
|
688 |
|
|
|
3 669 |
|
Other financial liabilities, derivatives(1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
114 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
114 |
|
Total liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
114 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
114 |
|
(1) |
Refer to Note 25, Derivative financial instruments for the allocation between hedge accounted and non-hedge accounted derivatives. |
The level 1 category includes financial assets and liabilities that are measured in whole by reference to published quotes in an active market. A financial
instrument is regarded as quoted in an active market if quoted prices are readily and regularly available from an exchange, and those prices represent actual and regularly occurring market transactions on an arms-length basis. This category
includes only exchange traded products. Comparative presentation has been updated accordingly.
The level 2 category includes financial assets and liabilities
measured using a valuation technique based on assumptions that are supported by prices from observable current market transactions. These include assets and liabilities with fair values based on quotes from third-party pricing services, financial
assets with fair values based on broker quotes and assets that are valued using the Groups own valuation models whereby the material assumptions are market observable. The majority of listed bonds and other securities, over-the-counter
derivatives and certain other products are included in this category.
The level 3 category includes a large number of investments in unlisted equities and unlisted
venture funds, including investments managed by Nokia Growth Partners specializing in growth-stage investing and by BlueRun Ventures focusing on early-stage opportunities. The level 3 fair value is determined using one or more valuation
techniques where the use of the market approach generally consists of using comparable market transactions, while the use of the income approach generally consists of calculating the net present value of expected future cash flows. For unlisted
funds, the selection of appropriate valuation techniques by the fund managing partner may be affected by the availability and reliability of relevant inputs. In some cases one valuation technique may provide the best indication of fair value while
in other circumstances multiple valuation techniques may be appropriate.
|
|
|
NOKIA ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 20-F 2016 |
|
185 |
Notes to consolidated financial statements continued
The inputs generally considered in determining the fair value include the original transaction price, recent transactions in the same or similar instruments, completed
or pending third-party transactions in the underlying investment or comparable issuers, subsequent rounds of financing, recapitalizations or other transactions undertaken by the issuer, offerings in the equity or debt capital markets, and changes in
financial ratios or cash flows, adjusted as appropriate for liquidity, credit, market and/or other risk factors. The level 3 investments are valued on a quarterly basis taking into consideration any changes, projections and assumptions, as well
as any changes in economic and other relevant conditions. The fair value may be adjusted to reflect illiquidity and/or non-transferability, with the amount of such discount estimated by the managing partner in the absence of market information.
Assumptions used by the managing partner due to the lack of observable inputs may impact the resulting fair value of individual investments, although no individual input has a significant impact on the total fair value of the level 3
investments.
Reconciliation of the opening and closing balances on level 3 financial assets and liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
EURm |
|
Level 3
financial assets and liabilities |
|
As of January 1,
2015 |
|
|
556 |
|
Net gain in income statement |
|
|
96 |
|
Net gain in other comprehensive income |
|
|
83 |
|
Purchases |
|
|
70 |
|
Sales |
|
|
(146 |
) |
Other |
|
|
29 |
|
As of December 31,
2015 |
|
|
688 |
|
Net gains in income statement |
|
|
52 |
|
Net loss recorded in other comprehensive income |
|
|
(48 |
) |
Acquisitions through business combination |
|
|
(14 |
) |
Purchases |
|
|
72 |
|
Sales |
|
|
(101 |
) |
Other |
|
|
11 |
|
As of December 31,
2016 |
|
|
660 |
|
The gains and losses from financial assets and liabilities categorized in level 3 are included in other operating income and expenses in
cases where the investment and disposal objectives for these investments are business-driven. In other cases, the gains and losses are included in financial income and expenses.
|
|
|
186 |
|
NOKIA ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 20-F 2016 |
25. Derivative financial instruments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities |
|
EURm |
|
|
Fair
value |
(1) |
|
|
Notional |
(2) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair
value |
(1) |
|
|
Notional |
(2) |
2016 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hedges on net investment in foreign subsidiaries |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forward foreign exchange contracts |
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
1 829 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
255 |
|
Cash flow hedges |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forward foreign exchange contracts |
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
382 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(9 |
) |
|
|
185 |
|
Fair value hedges |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate swaps |
|
|
42 |
|
|
|
300 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forward foreign exchange contracts |
|
|
21 |
|
|
|
350 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(51 |
) |
|
|
689 |
|
Firm commitments |
|
|
34 |
|
|
|
633 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6 |
) |
|
|
311 |
|
Cash flow and fair value
hedges(3) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cross-currency interest rate swaps |
|
|
42 |
|
|
|
1 002 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivatives not designated in hedge accounting relationships carried at fair value
through profit and loss |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forward foreign exchange contracts |
|
|
61 |
|
|
|
3 777 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(135 |
) |
|
|
7 526 |
|
Currency options bought |
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
569 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate swaps |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(29 |
) |
|
|
329 |
|
Other derivatives |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
|
157 |
|
Total |
|
|
235 |
|
|
|
8 842 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(236 |
) |
|
|
9 452 |
|
2015 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hedges on net investment in foreign subsidiaries |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forward foreign exchange contracts |
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
223 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
|
464 |
|
Currency options bought |
|
|
|
|
|
|
106 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Currency options sold |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
114 |
|
Cash flow hedges |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forward foreign exchange contracts |
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
844 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(19 |
) |
|
|
880 |
|
Fair value hedges |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate swaps |
|
|
52 |
|
|
|
301 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flow and fair value
hedges(3) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cross-currency interest rate swaps |
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
355 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
|
646 |
|
Derivatives not designated in hedge accounting relationships carried at fair value
through profit and loss |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forward foreign exchange contracts |
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
2 117 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(31 |
) |
|
|
2 296 |
|
Currency options bought |
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
350 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Currency options sold |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
48 |
|
Interest rate swaps |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(50 |
) |
|
|
646 |
|
Other derivatives |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
37 |
|
Total |
|
|
96 |
|
|
|
4 296 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(114 |
) |
|
|
5 131 |
|
(1) |
Included in other financial assets and other financial liabilities in the consolidated statement of financial position. |
(2) |
Includes the gross amount of all notional values for contracts that have not yet been settled or cancelled. The amount of notional value outstanding is not necessarily a measure or indication of market risk as the
exposure of certain contracts may be offset by that of other contracts. |
(3) |
Cross-currency interest rate swaps have been designated partly as fair value hedges and partly as cash flow hedges. |
|
|
|
NOKIA ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 20-F 2016 |
|
187 |
Notes to consolidated financial statements continued
26. Share-based payment
The
Group has several equity-based incentive programs for employees. The programs consist of performance share plans, restricted share plans and employee share purchase plans. New stock option plans are no longer granted, although the 2011 stock
option plan remains in force. Both executives and other eligible employees participate in these programs. The equity-based incentive grants are generally conditional on continued employment as well as the fulfillment of the performance, service and
other conditions determined in the relevant plan rules. The share-based payment expense for all equity-based incentive grants for Continuing operations amounts to EUR 130 million (EUR 67 million in 2015 and EUR 53 million in 2014).
Performance shares
In 2016, the Group administered four global
performance share plans, the Performance Share Plans of 2013, 2014, 2015 and 2016. The performance shares represent a commitment by the Group to deliver Nokia shares to employees at a future point in time, subject to the fulfillment of predetermined
performance criteria. In the Performance Share Plan of 2016, performance shares were granted with pre-defined performance criteria and included a minimum payout guarantee. As a result of the minimum payout defined in the terms and conditions of the
2016 Plan, the number of shares to be settled following the restriction period will start at 25% of the granted amount at target. The number of performance shares at target is the amount of performance shares granted to an individual that will be
settled if the target performance with respect to performance criteria is achieved. Any additional payout beyond the minimum amount will be determined based on the financial performance against the established performance criteria during the
two-year performance period. At maximum performance, the settlement amounts to two times the amount at target.
Global performance share plans as of
December 31:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Plan |
|
|
Performance
shares outstanding at target |
|
|
|
Confirmed
payout (% of target) |
|
|
|
Performance period |
|
|
|
Restriction period |
(1) |
|
|
Settlement year |
|
2013 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
86 |
|
|
|
20132014 |
|
|
|
2015 |
|
|
|
2016 |
|
2014 |
|
|
10 247 152 |
|
|
|
126 |
|
|
|
20142015 |
|
|
|
2016 |
|
|
|
2017 |
|
2015 |
|
|
10 818 660 |
|
|
|
124 |
|
|
|
20152016 |
|
|
|
2017 |
|
|
|
2018 |
|
2016 |
|
|
22 351 738 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20162017 |
|
|
|
2018 |
|
|
|
2019 |
|
(1) |
The restriction period will be no less than one year from the end of the performance period. |
Performance criteria for
the year ended December 31:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Threshold
performance |
|
|
Maximum performance |
|
|
Weight |
|
Performance criteria |
|
EUR |
|
|
EUR |
|
|
% |
|
2016 Plan |
|
Average annual net sales(1) 2016-2017 |
|
|
24 097 million |
|
|
|
27 724 million |
|
|
|
50 |
|
|
|
Average annual diluted(1) EPS 2016-2017 |
|
|
0.23 |
|
|
|
0.34 |
|
|
|
50 |
|
2015 Plan(2)
|
|
Annual net sales(1) in 2015 |
|
|
11 892 million |
|
|
|
14 144 million |
|
|
|
25 |
|
|
|
Annual net sales(1) in 2016 |
|
|
23 421 million |
|
|
|
27 852 million |
|
|
|
25 |
|
|
|
Average annual diluted(1) EPS 2015-2016 |
|
|
0.18 |
|
|
|
0.29 |
|
|
|
50 |
|
(1) |
Excludes costs related to the Acquisition of Alcatel Lucent and related integration, goodwill impairment charges, intangible asset amortization and other purchase price fair value adjustments, restructuring and
associated charges and certain other items. |
(2) |
The performance criteria of the Performance Share Plan 2015 were modified in 2016 to reflect the new structure and size of the Group following the Sale of the HERE Business and the Acquisition of Alcatel Lucent. The net
sales metric is weighted equally each year, instead of calculating an average over the two-year performance period due to significant difference between the metrics for Nokia in 2015 and the new combined company in 2016. |
Until the Nokia shares are delivered, the participants do not have any shareholder rights, such as voting or dividend rights, associated with the performance shares.
The performance share grants are generally forfeited if the employment relationship with the Group terminates prior to vesting.
|
|
|
188 |
|
NOKIA ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 20-F 2016 |
Restricted shares
In 2016, the Group administered four global restricted
share plans: the Restricted Share Plan 2013, 2014, 2015 and 2016. The vesting schedule for plans prior to the 2015 Plan was 36 months following the grant quarter. The vesting schedule for the 2015 and 2016 Plans introduce tranche vesting and vest in
three equal tranches on the first, second and the third anniversary of the award subject to continued employment with the Group. Restricted shares are granted on a limited basis for exceptional purposes related to retention and recruitment of
individuals deemed critical to the Groups future success. Until the Nokia shares are delivered, the participants do not have any shareholder rights, such as voting or dividend rights, associated with the restricted shares. The restricted
share grants are generally forfeited if the employment relationship with the Group terminates prior to vesting of the applicable tranche or tranches.
Active
share-based payment plans by instrument
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Performance shares outstanding at target(1) |
|
|
|
|
|
Restricted shares outstanding(1) |
|
|
|
Number of |
|
|
Weighted average grant |
|
|
|
|
|
Number of |
|
|
Weighted average grant |
|
|
|
performance |
|
|
date fair value |
|
|
|
|
|
restricted |
|
|
date fair value |
|
|
|
|
shares at target |
|
|
|
EUR |
(2) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
shares outstanding |
|
|
|
EUR |
(2) |
As of January 1,
2014 |
|
|
21 980 408 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30 356 850 |
|
|
|
|
|
Granted |
|
|
13 934 730 |
|
|
|
6.07 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 013 466 |
|
|
|
5.62 |
|
Forfeited |
|
|
(18 676 072 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(19 546 605 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Vested |
|
|
(5 000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4 228 306 |
) |
|
|
|
|
As of December 31,
2014 |
|
|
17 234 066 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7 595 405 |
|
|
|
|
|
Granted |
|
|
13 553 992 |
|
|
|
5.78 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
342 200 |
|
|
|
6.22 |
|
Forfeited |
|
|
(7 859 208 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3 880 221 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Vested |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1 952 910 |
) |
|
|
|
|
As of December 31,
2015 |
|
|
22 928 850 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 104 474 |
|
|
|
|
|
Granted |
|
|
23 110 479 |
|
|
|
4.70 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5 406 682 |
|
|
|
4.73 |
|
Forfeited |
|
|
(1 489 070 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(255 023 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Vested |
|
|
(1 132 709 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1 286 596 |
) |
|
|
|
|
As of December 31, 2016(3) |
|
|
43 417 550 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5 969 537 |
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
Includes performance and restricted shares granted under other than global equity plans. |
(2) |
The fair values of performance and restricted shares are estimated based on the grant date market price of the Nokia share less the present value of dividends expected to be paid during the vesting period.
|
(3) |
Includes 10 247 152 performance shares for the Performance Share Plan 2014 and 521 685 Restricted Shares that vested on January 1, 2017. |
Employee share purchase plan
The Group offers a voluntary Employee Share
Purchase Plan to its employees. Employees make contributions from their salary to purchase Nokia shares on a monthly basis during a 12-month savings period. The Group intends to deliver one matching share for every two purchased shares the employee
still holds as of the end of the Plan cycle. In 2016, 1 661 951 matching shares were issued as a settlement to the participants of the Employee Share Purchase Plan 2015 (140 436 matching shares issued in 2015). Additionally in 2016, according to the
terms and conditions of the plan, the Group issued 20 free shares to the participants of the Employee Share Purchase Plan, being 601 408 shares in total.
|
|
|
NOKIA ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 20-F 2016 |
|
189 |
Notes to consolidated financial statements continued
Legacy equity compensation programs
Stock options
In 2016, the Group administered two global stock option plans, the Stock Option Plans 2007 and 2011, approved by the shareholders at the Annual General
Meeting in the year when the plan was launched. Stock option plans have not been granted since 2013 as compensation to Group employees. The Stock Option Plan 2007 lapsed on January 1, 2016.
Each stock option entitles the holder to subscribe for one new Nokia share. The stock options are non-transferable and may be exercised for shares only. Shares will be
eligible for dividends for the financial year in which the share subscription takes place. Other shareholder rights will commence on the date on which the subscribed shares are entered in the Trade Register. The stock option grants are generally
forfeited if the employment relationship with the Group is terminated.
Reconciliation of stock options outstanding and exercisable:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
average exercise |
|
|
average share |
|
|
Number of |
|
|
average exercise |
|
|
|
Number |
|
|
price |
|
|
price |
|
|
options |
|
|
price |
|
Shares under option(1) |
|
|
of shares |
|
|
|
EUR |
|
|
|
EUR |
|
|
|
exercisable |
|
|
|
EUR |
|
As of January 1,
2014 |
|
|
28 000 192 |
|
|
|
4.47 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4 339 341 |
|
|
|
9.66 |
|
Exercised |
|
|
(56 623 |
) |
|
|
5.75 |
|
|
|
6.69 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forfeited |
|
|
(16 839 593 |
) |
|
|
3.39 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expired |
|
|
(3 759 953 |
) |
|
|
9.94 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31,
2014 |
|
|
7 344 023 |
|
|
|
4.81 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 913 537 |
|
|
|
10.43 |
|
Exercised |
|
|
(1 242 381 |
) |
|
|
3.79 |
|
|
|
6.44 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forfeited |
|
|
(2 215 216 |
) |
|
|
2.48 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expired |
|
|
(246 140 |
) |
|
|
8.07 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31,
2015 |
|
|
3 640 286 |
|
|
|
4.67 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 318 911 |
|
|
|
5.97 |
|
Exercised |
|
|
(832 900 |
) |
|
|
2.52 |
|
|
|
4.87 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forfeited |
|
|
(17 875 |
) |
|
|
2.57 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expired |
|
|
(1 188 490 |
) |
|
|
7.81 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31,
2016 |
|
|
1 601 021 |
|
|
|
3.34 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 197 771 |
|
|
|
3.56 |
|
(1) |
Includes stock options granted under other than global equity plans, excluding the 2012 Nokia Networks Equity Incentive Plan. |
Nokia Networks equity incentive plan
In 2012,
the Board of Nokia Siemens Networks established the Nokia Networks Equity Incentive Plan (the Plan), a share-based incentive program under which options for Nokia Solutions and Networks B.V. shares were granted to selected key employees
and senior management. In 2015, 30% of the options became exercisable and the remaining 70% became exercisable in 2016. The exercise price of the options is based on a per share value on grant as determined for the purposes of the Plan.
The options are accounted for as a cash-settled share-based payment liability as of December 31, 2016. The fair value of the liability is determined based on the estimated fair value of shares less the exercise price of the options on the
reporting date. The total carrying amount of the Plan is EUR 9 million (EUR 73 million in 2015) and is included in accrued expenses and other liabilities in the consolidated statement of financial position.
Alcatel Lucent equity incentive plan
Following
the Acquisition of Alcatel Lucent, plans previously granted to former Alcatel Lucent employees that remained outstanding and exercisable were transferred to the Group with original vesting terms and conditions. Multiple liquidity agreements were
offered in limited circumstances as part of the transaction to support the delivery of specific awards at the point of vesting with settlement in Nokia shares. For the primary liquidity arrangement (applied to the 2015 performance share grant), the
performance conditions are market-driven and the terms were modified to acknowledge the change from Alcatel Lucent share-related measure to Nokia share measure. All shares granted that are covered under the liquidity agreements are accounted for as
replacement plans.
At the time of the Squeeze-Out, the remaining plans were modified to allow for the completion of the Squeeze-Out. Modifications to remaining
outstanding share and option grants not already covered by liquidity agreements, included mandatory acceleration of unvested performance shares, and modification of plan terms for outstanding stock options that result in options delivered in cash
rather than equity, keeping all other terms of the plan constant. The options are accounted for as a cash-settled share-based payment liability as of December 31, 2016. EUR 8 million was included in the total share-based compensation
expense in the consolidated income statement in relation to these legacy Alcatel Lucent plans. The fair value of the liability is determined based on the estimated fair value of shares less the exercise price of the options on the reporting date.
The total carrying amount of the liability is EUR 19 million and is included in accrued expenses and other liabilities in the consolidated statement of financial position.
|
|
|
190 |
|
NOKIA ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 20-F 2016 |
27. Pensions and other post-employment benefits
The Group operates a number of post-employment plans in various countries including both defined contribution and defined benefit plans. Defined benefit plans expose
the Group to actuarial risks such as investment risk, interest rate risk, and life expectancy risk. The characteristics and associated risks of the defined benefit plans vary depending on legal, fiscal, and economic requirements in each country.
These characteristics and risks are further described below and relate to the plans included in Continuing operations.
The total net defined benefit liability is
EUR 1 198 million (EUR 398 million in 2015) consisting of net pension and other post-employment benefit liabilities of EUR 5 000 million (EUR 423 million in 2015) and net pension and other post-employment benefit assets of
EUR 3 802 million (EUR 25 million in 2015).
Defined benefit plans
The Groups most significant defined benefit pension plans are in the United States, Germany, and the United Kingdom. Together they account for 93% (80% in 2015)
of the Groups total defined benefit obligation and 92% (81% in 2015) of the Groups total plan assets.
The defined benefit obligations, the fair value
of plan assets, the effects of the asset ceiling and the net defined benefit balance as of December 31:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2016 |
|
|
|
|
|
2015 |
|
EURm |
|
Defined benefit obligation |
|
|
Fair value of plan assets |
|
|
Effects of asset ceiling |
|
|
Net defined benefit balance |
|
|
|
|
|
Defined benefit obligation |
|
|
Fair value of plan assets |
|
|
Effects of asset ceiling |
|
|
Net defined benefit balance |
|
United States |
|
|
(22 845 |
) |
|
|
22 880 |
|
|
|
(265 |
) |
|
|
(230 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(59 |
) |
|
|
57 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2 |
) |
Germany |
|
|
(2 680 |
) |
|
|
1 160 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1 520 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1 279 |
) |
|
|
980 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(299 |
) |
United Kingdom |
|
|
(1 265 |
) |
|
|
1 485 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
220 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(128 |
) |
|
|
136 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8 |
|
Other |
|
|
(1 873 |
) |
|
|
2 245 |
|
|
|
(40 |
) |
|
|
332 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(374 |
) |
|
|
278 |
|
|
|
(9 |
) |
|
|
(105 |
) |
Total |
|
|
(28 663 |
) |
|
|
27 770 |
|
|
|
(305 |
) |
|
|
(1 198 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1 840 |
) |
|
|
1 451 |
|
|
|
(9 |
) |
|
|
(398 |
) |
United States
The Group has significant defined benefit pension plans and a significant post-retirement welfare benefit plan (Opeb), providing post-retirement healthcare
benefits and life insurance coverage, in the United States. The pension plans include both traditional service-based programs as well as cash-balance plans. The management plan for salaried, non-union member employees was closed to new entrants
after December 31, 2007 and fully frozen as of December 31, 2009. The Group, then Alcatel Lucent, adopted a new cash-balance program for salaried, non-union member employees from January 1, 2015. The program was extended to all United
States-based salaried employees, except the employees of Nokia Technologies, from January 1, 2017. For union-represented employees, the Group maintains two United States Occupational plans which are traditional service-based pension programs.
The larger of the two, which represents 95% of the obligation, is a closed plan. Post-retirement welfare benefit plans are maintained for certain retired former employees. An agreement was made with the Communications Workers of America
(CWA) and the International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers (IBEW) unions to continue to provide post-retirement healthcare benefits and life-insurance coverage for employees formerly represented by these two
unions.
The defined benefit obligations, the fair value of plan assets, the effects of the asset ceiling and the net defined benefit balance as of
December 31:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2016 |
|
|
|
|
|
2015 |
|
EURm |
|
Defined benefit obligation |
|
|
Fair value of plan assets |
|
|
Effects of asset ceiling |
|
|
Net defined benefit balance |
|
|
|
|
|
Defined benefit obligation |
|
|
Fair value of plan assets |
|
|
Effects of asset ceiling |
|
|
Net defined benefit balance |
|
Pension benefits |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Management |
|
|
(15 855 |
) |
|
|
16 861 |
|
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
1 004 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(59 |
) |
|
|
57 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2 |
) |
Occupational |
|
|
(3 528 |
) |
|
|
5 440 |
|
|
|
(263 |
) |
|
|
1 649 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental |
|
|
(401 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(401 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
(19 784 |
) |
|
|
22 301 |
|
|
|
(265 |
) |
|
|
2 252 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(59 |
) |
|
|
57 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2 |
) |
Post-retirement benefits |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Health (non-union represented) |
|
|
(126 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(126 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Health (formerly union represented) |
|
|
(1 343 |
) |
|
|
270 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1 073 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Group life (non-union represented) |
|
|
(1 040 |
) |
|
|
220 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(820 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Group life (formerly union represented) |
|
|
(551 |
) |
|
|
89 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(462 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
(3 061 |
) |
|
|
579 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2 482 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NOKIA ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 20-F 2016 |
|
191 |
Notes to consolidated financial statements continued
Germany
The Group maintains two primary plans
in Germany which cover the majority of active employees: the cash balance plan Beitragsorientierter Alterversorgungs Plan (BAP) and a similar cash balance program for the Groups former Alcatel Lucent employees. Individual benefits
are generally dependent on eligible compensation levels, ranking within the Group and years of service. These plans are partially funded defined benefit pension plans, the benefits being subject to a minimum return guaranteed by the Group. The
funding vehicle for the BAP plan is the NSN Pension Trust e.V. The funding vehicle for the former Alcatel Lucent cash balance plan is the Alcatel SEL Unterstützungs-GmbH. The trusts are legally separate from the Group and manage the plan assets
in accordance with the respective trust agreements.
All other plans have been previously frozen and replaced by the cash balance plans. Benefits are paid in annual
installments, as monthly retirement pension, or as a lump sum on retirement in an amount equal to accrued pensions and guaranteed interest. The risks specific to the German defined benefit plans are related to changes in mortality of covered members
and return on investment on plan assets.
United Kingdom
The Group has three plans in the United Kingdom. The defined benefit for the legacy Nokia employees is divided into two sections: the money purchase section and the
final salary section, both being closed to future contributions and accruals as of April 30, 2012. Individual benefits are generally dependent on eligible compensation levels and years of service for the defined benefit section of the plan
and on individual investment choices for the defined contribution section of the plan. The funding vehicle for the pension plan is the NSN Pension Plan that is run on a trust basis. The other two defined benefit pension plans are the Alcatel Pension
Plan and the Lucent Technologies Retirement Benefits Plan. Both plans were closed to new entrants in 2002 and 2001, respectively, although active employees still accrue benefits. These plans are both final salary-based programs.
Impact on the consolidated financial statements
Movements in the defined benefit obligation, fair value of plan assets and the impact of the asset ceiling
The movements in the present value of the defined benefit obligation for the years ended December 31:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2016 |
|
|
|
|
|
2015 |
|
EURm |
|
United States
pension |
|
|
United States
Opeb |
|
|
Other
pension |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
United States
pension |
|
|
Other
pension |
|
|
Total |
|
As of
January 1 |
|
|
(58 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1 782 |
) |
|
|
(1 840 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(71 |
) |
|
|
(1 813 |
) |
|
|
(1 884 |
) |
Transfer to Discontinued operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16 |
|
Current service cost |
|
|
(63 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(92 |
) |
|
|
(155 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(46 |
) |
|
|
(46 |
) |
Interest expense |
|
|
(711 |
) |
|
|
(111 |
) |
|
|
(150 |
) |
|
|
(972 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
(46 |
) |
|
|
(49 |
) |
Past service cost and gains on curtailments |
|
|
(13 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
Settlements |
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
(782 |
) |
|
|
(111 |
) |
|
|
(225 |
) |
|
|
(1 118 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
(87 |
) |
|
|
(90 |
) |
Remeasurements: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gain/(loss) from change in demographic assumptions |
|
|
79 |
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
(13 |
) |
|
|
81 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
(Loss)/gain from change in financial assumptions |
|
|
(301 |
) |
|
|
(60 |
) |
|
|
(593 |
) |
|
|
(954 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
112 |
|
|
|
114 |
|
Experience gain/(loss) |
|
|
227 |
|
|
|
205 |
|
|
|
(74 |
) |
|
|
358 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
160 |
|
|
|
(680 |
) |
|
|
(515 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
110 |
|
|
|
114 |
|
Exchange differences |
|
|
(615 |
) |
|
|
(91 |
) |
|
|
166 |
|
|
|
(540 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6 |
) |
|
|
(29 |
) |
|
|
(35 |
) |
Contributions from plan participants |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(124 |
) |
|
|
(20 |
) |
|
|
(144 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(16 |
) |
|
|
(16 |
) |
Benefit payments from plans |
|
|
1 595 |
|
|
|
366 |
|
|
|
243 |
|
|
|
2 204 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
58 |
|
|
|
60 |
|
Acquisitions through business combinations |
|
|
(19 919 |
) |
|
|
(3 243 |
) |
|
|
(3 431 |
) |
|
|
(26 593 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
(4 |
) |
Other |
|
|
(10 |
) |
|
|
(18 |
) |
|
|
(89 |
) |
|
|
(117 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
(1 |
) |
Total |
|
|
(18 949 |
) |
|
|
(3 110 |
) |
|
|
(3 131 |
) |
|
|
(25 190 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
As of
December 31 |
|
|
(19 784 |
) |
|
|
(3 061 |
) |
|
|
(5 818 |
) |
|
|
(28 663 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(58 |
) |
|
|
(1 782 |
) |
|
|
(1 840 |
) |
|
|
|
192 |
|
NOKIA ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 20-F 2016 |
The movements in the fair value of plan assets for the years ended December 31:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2016 |
|
|
|
|
|
2015 |
|
EURm |
|
United States
pension |
|
|
United States
Opeb |
|
|
Other
pension |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
United States
pension |
|
|
Other
pension |
|
|
Total |
|
As of
January 1 |
|
|
57 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 394 |
|
|
|
1 451 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
59 |
|
|
|
1 328 |
|
|
|
1 387 |
|
Transfer to Discontinued operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5 |
) |
Interest income |
|
|
774 |
|
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
135 |
|
|
|
927 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
38 |
|
|
|
40 |
|
Administrative expenses and interest on asset ceiling |
|
|
(19 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
(20 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
(1 |
) |
Settlements |
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6 |
) |
|
|
(11 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
750 |
|
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
128 |
|
|
|
896 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
37 |
|
|
|
39 |
|
Remeasurements: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Return on plan assets, excluding amounts included in interest income |
|
|
947 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
387 |
|
|
|
1 340 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
Total |
|
|
947 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
387 |
|
|
|
1 340 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
Exchange differences |
|
|
709 |
|
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
(207 |
) |
|
|
518 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
22 |
|
|
|
28 |
|
Contributions: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Employers |
|
|
32 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
74 |
|
|
|
116 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26 |
|
|
|
26 |
|
Plan participants |
|
|
|
|
|
|
124 |
|
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
144 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
16 |
|
Benefit payments from plans |
|
|
(1 595 |
) |
|
|
(366 |
) |
|
|
(164 |
) |
|
|
(2 125 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
(45 |
) |
|
|
(47 |
) |
Acquisitions through business combinations |
|
|
21 571 |
|
|
|
599 |
|
|
|
3 182 |
|
|
|
25 352 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
Other(1) |
|
|
(170 |
) |
|
|
172 |
|
|
|
76 |
|
|
|
78 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
Total |
|
|
20 547 |
|
|
|
555 |
|
|
|
2 981 |
|
|
|
24 083 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
24 |
|
|
|
28 |
|
As of
December 31 |
|
|
22 301 |
|
|
|
579 |
|
|
|
4 890 |
|
|
|
27 770 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
57 |
|
|
|
1 394 |
|
|
|
1 451 |
|
(1) Includes
Section 420 asset transfer between United States pension and United States Opeb. The
movements in the funded status for the years ended December 31: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2016 |
|
|
|
|
|
2015 |
|
EURm |
|
United States pension |
|
|
United States Opeb |
|
|
Other pension |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
United States pension |
|
|
Other pension |
|
|
Total |
|
As of
January 1 |
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(388 |
) |
|
|
(389 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(12 |
) |
|
|
(485 |
) |
|
|
(497 |
) |
Transfer to Discontinued operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11 |
|
Current service cost |
|
|
(63 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(92 |
) |
|
|
(155 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(46 |
) |
|
|
(46 |
) |
Interest income/(expense) |
|
|
44 |
|
|
|
(93 |
) |
|
|
(16 |
) |
|
|
(65 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
(8 |
) |
|
|
(9 |
) |
Past service cost and gains on curtailments |
|
|
(13 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
Settlements |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
(1 |
) |
Total |
|
|
(32 |
) |
|
|
(93 |
) |
|
|
(97 |
) |
|
|
(222 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
(50 |
) |
|
|
(51 |
) |
Remeasurements: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Return on plan assets, excluding amounts included in interest income |
|
|
947 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
387 |
|
|
|
1 340 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
Gain/(loss) from change in demographic assumptions |
|
|
79 |
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
(13 |
) |
|
|
81 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
(Loss)/gain from change in financial assumptions |
|
|
(301 |
) |
|
|
(60 |
) |
|
|
(593 |
) |
|
|
(954 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
112 |
|
|
|
114 |
|
Experience gain/(loss) |
|
|
227 |
|
|
|
205 |
|
|
|
(74 |
) |
|
|
358 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
952 |
|
|
|
166 |
|
|
|
(293 |
) |
|
|
825 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
115 |
|
|
|
116 |
|
Exchange differences |
|
|
94 |
|
|
|
(75 |
) |
|
|
(41 |
) |
|
|
(22 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7 |
) |
|
|
(7 |
) |
Employer contributions |
|
|
32 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
74 |
|
|
|
116 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26 |
|
|
|
26 |
|
Benefit payments from plans |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
79 |
|
|
|
79 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
13 |
|
Acquisitions through business combinations |
|
|
1 652 |
|
|
|
(2 644 |
) |
|
|
(249 |
) |
|
|
(1 241 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other(1) |
|
|
(180 |
) |
|
|
154 |
|
|
|
(13 |
) |
|
|
(39 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
1 598 |
|
|
|
(2 555 |
) |
|
|
(150 |
) |
|
|
(1 107 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32 |
|
|
|
32 |
|
As of
December 31 |
|
|
2 517 |
|
|
|
(2 482 |
) |
|
|
(928 |
) |
|
|
(893 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
(388 |
) |
|
|
(389 |
) |
(1) |
Includes Section 420 asset transfer between United States pension and United States Opeb. |
|
|
|
NOKIA ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 20-F 2016 |
|
193 |
Notes to consolidated financial statements continued
The movements in the impact of the asset ceiling limitation for the years ended December 31:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2016 |
|
|
|
|
|
2015 |
|
EURm |
|
United States
pension |
|
|
United States
Opeb |
|
|
Other
pension |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
United States
pension |
|
|
Other
pension |
|
|
Total |
|
As of
January 1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(9 |
) |
|
|
(9 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
(3 |
) |
Interest expense |
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Remeasurements: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in asset ceiling, excluding amounts included in interest (expense)/income |
|
|
(251 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7 |
) |
|
|
(258 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6 |
) |
|
|
(6 |
) |
Acquisitions through business combinations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(22 |
) |
|
|
(22 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exchange differences |
|
|
(13 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
(14 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of
December 31 |
|
|
(265 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(40 |
) |
|
|
(305 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(9 |
) |
|
|
(9 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net balances as of December 31:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2016 |
|
|
|
|
|
2015 |
|
EURm |
|
United States
pension |
|
|
United States
Opeb |
|
|
Other
pension |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
United States
pension |
|
|
Other
pension |
|
|
Total |
|
Total as of December
31 |
|
|
2 252 |
|
|
|
(2 482 |
) |
|
|
(968 |
) |
|
|
(1 198 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
(397 |
) |
|
|
(398 |
) |
Present value of obligations includes EUR 21 271 million (EUR 428 million in 2015) of wholly funded obligations, EUR 6
122 million (EUR 1 337 million in 2015) of partly funded obligations and EUR 1 270 million (EUR 75 million in 2015) of unfunded obligations.
Recognized in the income statement
Recognized
in personnel expenses in the consolidated income statement for the years ended December 31:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EURm |
|
2016 |
|
|
2015 |
|
|
2014 |
|
Current service cost |
|
|
155 |
|
|
|
46 |
|
|
|
39 |
|
Past service cost and gains and losses on curtailments |
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Net interest cost |
|
|
65 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
Settlements |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
222 |
|
|
|
51 |
|
|
|
45 |
|
Of which relates to: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
United States pensions |
|
|
32 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
United States Opeb |
|
|
92 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other pensions |
|
|
98 |
|
|
|
50 |
|
|
|
45 |
|
|
|
|
|
Recognized in comprehensive income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recognized in other comprehensive income for the years ended December 31:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EURm |
|
2016 |
|
|
2015 |
|
|
2014 |
|
Return on plan assets (excluding interest income), gain |
|
|
1 340 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
44 |
|
Changes in demographic assumptions, gain/(loss) |
|
|
81 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
Changes in financial assumptions, (loss)/gain |
|
|
(954 |
) |
|
|
114 |
|
|
|
(321 |
) |
Experience adjustments, gain/(loss) |
|
|
358 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(16 |
) |
Current year change in asset ceiling |
|
|
(259 |
) |
|
|
(6 |
) |
|
|
4 |
|
Total |
|
|
566 |
|
|
|
110 |
|
|
|
290 |
|
Of which relates to: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
United States pensions |
|
|
701 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
United States Opeb |
|
|
166 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other pensions |
|
|
(301 |
) |
|
|
110 |
|
|
|
290 |
|
|
|
|
194 |
|
NOKIA ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 20-F 2016 |
Actuarial assumptions and sensitivity analysis
Actuarial assumptions
Assumptions regarding
future mortality are set based on actuarial advice in accordance with published statistics and experience in each country. The discount rates and mortality tables used for the significant plans:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2016 |
|
|
2015 |
|
|
|
|
|
2016 |
|
|
|
Discount rate % |
|
|
|
|
|
Mortality table |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RP2014 w/MP2016 |
|
United States |
|
|
3.7 |
|
|
|
4.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
mortality projection scale |
|
Germany |
|
|
1.6 |
|
|
|
2.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Heubeck Richttafeln |
|
United Kingdom(1) |
|
|
2.7 |
|
|
|
3.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005G S2PA Light |
|
Total weighted average for all countries |
|
|
3.3 |
|
|
|
3.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
Tables are adjusted with 1.5% long-term rate of improvement. |
The principal actuarial weighted average assumptions used
for determining the defined benefit obligation:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% |
|
2016 |
|
|
2015 |
|
Discount rate for determining present values |
|
|
3.3 |
|
|
|
3.0 |
|
Annual rate of increase in future compensation levels |
|
|
1.9 |
|
|
|
2.6 |
|
Pension growth rate |
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
|
1.3 |
|
Inflation rate |
|
|
2.0 |
|
|
|
1.4 |
|
Weighted average duration of defined benefit
obligations |
|
|
11yrs |
|
|
|
15yrs |
|
United States defined benefit
plans Actuarial assumptions used for determining the defined benefit obligation:
|
|
% |
|
2016 |
|
|
2015 |
|
Benefit obligation, discount rate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pension |
|
|
3.7 |
|
|
|
4.5 |
|
Postretirement healthcare and other |
|
|
3.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
Postretirement group life |
|
|
3.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
Annual rate of increase in future compensation levels |
|
|
2.08 |
|
|
|
|
|
Assumed healthcare cost trend rates |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Healthcare costs trend rate assumed for next year |
|
|
7.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
Healthcare cost trend rate assumed for next year (excluding post-retirement dental benefits) |
|
|
7.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
Terminal growth rate |
|
|
4.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
Year that the rate reaches the terminal growth value |
|
|
2028 |
|
|
|
|
|
Sensitivity analysis
The sensitivity of the defined benefit obligation to changes in the principal assumptions:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase in
assumption |
(1) |
|
|
Decrease in
assumption |
(1) |
|
|
|
Change in assumption |
|
|
|
EURm |
|
|
|
EURm |
|
Discount rate for determining present values |
|
|
1.0% |
|
|
|
2 766 |
|
|
|
(3 361 |
) |
Annual rate of increase in future compensation levels |
|
|
1.0% |
|
|
|
(126 |
) |
|
|
112 |
|
Pension growth rate |
|
|
1.0% |
|
|
|
(580 |
) |
|
|
481 |
|
Inflation rate |
|
|
1.0% |
|
|
|
(581 |
) |
|
|
471 |
|
Healthcare cost trend rate |
|
|
1.0% |
|
|
|
(74 |
) |
|
|
67 |
|
Life expectancy |
|
|
1 year |
|
|
|
(826 |
) |
|
|
773 |
|
(1) |
Positive movement indicates a reduction in the defined benefit obligation; a negative movement indicates an increase in the defined benefit obligation. |
The above sensitivity analyses are based on a change in an assumption while holding all other assumptions constant and may not be representative of the actual impact of
changes. If more than one assumption is changed simultaneously, the combined impact of changes would not necessarily be the same as the sum of the individual changes. If the assumptions change to a different level compared with that presented above,
the effect on the defined benefit obligation may not be linear. The methods and types of assumptions used in preparing the sensitivity analyses are the same as in the previous period.
When calculating the sensitivity of the defined benefit obligation to significant actuarial assumptions, the same method has been applied as when calculating the
post-employment benefit obligation recognized in the consolidated statement of financial position; specifically, the present value of the defined benefit obligation is calculated with the projected unit credit method. Increases and decreases in the
discount rate, rate of increase in future compensation levels, pension growth rate and inflation, which are used in determining the defined benefit obligation, do not have a symmetrical effect on the defined benefit obligation primarily due to the
compound interest effect created when determining the net present value of the future benefit.
|
|
|
NOKIA ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 20-F 2016 |
|
195 |
Notes to consolidated financial statements continued
Investment strategies
The overall investment objective is to preserve or
enhance the plans funded status through the implementation of an investment strategy that maximizes return within the context of minimizing surplus risk. In formulating the asset allocation for the Plans, multiple factors are considered,
including, but not limited to the long-term risk and return expectations for a variety of asset classes as well as current and multi-year projections of the Plans demographics, benefit payments, contributions and funded status. The results of
the Asset-Liability framework are implemented on a plan level.
The Groups pension governance does not allow the pension funds themselves to make direct
investments and requires all investments to be placed either in funds partnerships or separate accounts managed by professional asset managers. The investment advisors may use derivative financial instruments including futures contracts, forward
contracts, options and interest rate swaps to manage market risk. The performance and risk profile of investments is constantly monitored on a stand-alone basis as well as in the broader portfolio context. One major risk is a decline in
the plans funded status as a result of the adverse performance of plan assets and/or defined benefit obligations. The application of the Asset-Liability Model study focuses on minimizing such risks.
Disaggregation of plan assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2016 |
|
|
|
|
|
2015 |
|
EURm |
|
Quoted |
|
|
Unquoted |
|
|
Total |
|
|
% |
|
|
|
|
|
Quoted |
|
|
Unquoted |
|
|
Total |
|
|
% |
|
Equity securities |
|
|
2 777 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 777 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
348 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
348 |
|
|
|
24 |
|
Debt securities |
|
|
18 329 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18 329 |
|
|
|
66 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
627 |
|
|
|
98 |
|
|
|
725 |
|
|
|
51 |
|
Insurance contracts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
833 |
|
|
|
833 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
78 |
|
|
|
78 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
Real estate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 389 |
|
|
|
1 389 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
77 |
|
|
|
77 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
Short-term investments |
|
|
1 110 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 110 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
124 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
133 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 332 |
|
|
|
3 332 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
90 |
|
|
|
90 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
Total |
|
|
22 216 |
|
|
|
5 554 |
|
|
|
27 770 |
|
|
|
100 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 099 |
|
|
|
352 |
|
|
|
1 451 |
|
|
|
100 |
|
All short-term investments including cash, equities and nearly all fixed-income securities have quoted market prices in active markets.
Equity securities represent investments in equity funds and direct investments, which have quoted market prices in an active market. Debt securities represent investments in government and corporate bonds, as well as investments in bond funds, which
have quoted market prices in an active market. Debt securities may also comprise investments in funds and direct investments. Insurance contracts are customary pension insurance contracts structured under domestic law in the respective countries.
Real estate investments are investments in commercial properties or real estate funds which invest in a diverse range of real estate properties. Short-term investments are liquid assets or cash which are being held for a short period of time,
with the primary purpose of controlling the tactical asset allocation. Other includes commodities as well as alternative investments, including derivative financial instruments.
United States plan
United States plan asset
target and actual allocation range of the pension and post-retirement trust by asset category as of December 31, 2016:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% |
|
Pension target
allocation range |
|
|
Percentage of plan assets |
|
|
Post retirement
target allocation |
|
|
Percentage of post
employment plan assets |
|
Equity securities |
|
|
713 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
45 |
|
|
|
45 |
|
Fixed income securities |
|
|
6283 |
|
|
|
73 |
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
15 |
|
Real estate |
|
|
59 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Private equity and other |
|
|
815 |
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
40 |
|
|
|
40 |
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
100 |
|
|
|
100 |
|
|
|
100 |
|
The majority of the Groups United States pension plan assets are held in a master pension trust. The post-retirement plan assets
are held in two separate trusts in addition to the amount set aside in the master pension trust for retiree healthcare. The Pension & Benefits Investment Committee formally approves the target allocation ranges every few years on the
completion of the Asset-Liability Model study by external advisors and internal investment management. The overall United States pension plan asset portfolio reflects a balance of investments split about 27.0/73.0 between equity, including
alternative investments for this purpose, and fixed income securities.
United States pension plan assets included EUR 15 million Nokia bonds as of
December 31, 2016 (EUR 8 million in 2015).
|
|
|
196 |
|
NOKIA ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 20-F 2016 |
Future cash flows
Contributions
Group contributions to the pension and other post-retirement benefit plans are made to facilitate future benefit payments to plan participants. The funding policy is to
meet minimum funding requirements as set forth in the employee benefit and tax laws, as well as any such additional amounts as the Group may determine to be appropriate. Contributions are made to benefit plans for the sole benefit of plan
participants. Employer contributions expected to be made in 2017 are EUR 123 million.
United States pension plans
Funding methods
Funding requirements for the
three major United States qualified pension plans are determined by the applicable statutes, namely the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA), the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, and regulations issued by the Internal
Revenue Service (IRS).
In determining funding requirements, ERISA allows assets to be either market value or an average value over a period of time;
and liabilities to be based on average interest rates over a period of time. A preliminary assessment indicates that no funding is required for the active management and occupational pension plans until, at least 2018. For the inactive occupational
pension plan, the Group does not foresee any future funding requirement for regulatory funding purposes, given the plans asset allocation, and the level of assets compared to liabilities.
Section 420 transfer
Section 420 of
the of the IRS (Section 420) allows for the transfer of pension assets in excess of specified thresholds (excess pension assets) over the plans funding obligation to be used to fund the healthcare benefits and life
insurance coverage of that plans retired participants. Section 420 regulations require the Group to continue to provide healthcare benefits or life insurance coverage to those retirees for a certain period of time (cost maintenance
period), at levels prescribed by the regulations. Section 420 is currently set to expire on December 31, 2025. On December 1, 2016, the Group made EUR 180 million Section 420 transfer of excess pension assets from
the inactive occupational pension plan to fund healthcare benefits and life insurance coverage for retirees who, when actively employed were represented by CWA and IBEW. The Group expects to make a further Section 420 transfer during 2017 from
the inactive occupational pension plan to fund healthcare benefits and group life insurance coverage.
Contributions
The following table summarizes expected contributions to the pension and post-retirement plans until 2026. These figures include the reimbursements the Group will
receive from the coverage provided to plan participants eligible for the Medicare Prescription drug benefit. The Group did not make contributions to its qualified pension plans during 2016, nor does it expect to make any contributions until, at
least 2018. Actual contributions may differ from expected contributions due to various factors, including performance of plan assets, interest rates and legislative changes.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pension |
|
|
|
|
|
Post-retirement |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Medicare subsidy(1) for |
|
EURm |
|
Non-qualified
plans |
|
|
|
|
|
Non-represented |
|
|
Other benefit plans |
|
|
formerly union represented |
|
2017 |
|
|
28 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
(21 |
) |
2018 |
|
|
28 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
(21 |
) |
2019 |
|
|
28 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
(20 |
) |
2020 |
|
|
28 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
(19 |
) |
2021 |
|
|
27 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
(18 |
) |
2022-2026 |
|
|
128 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
60 |
|
|
|
255 |
|
|
|
(79 |
) |
(1) |
Medicare Subsidy is recorded within other movements in the reconciliation of the present value of the defined benefit obligation. |
Certain actuarial assumptions used to determine whether pension plan funding is required differ from those used for accounting purposes, which may cause significant
differences in volatile markets. While the basis for developing discount rates in both cases is by corporate bond yields, for accounting purposes, a yield curve developed by CitiGroup is used as of the close of the last business day of the financial
year; whereas the ERISA funding rules allow the use of either a daily average yield curve for the last month of the financial year, or a two-year average yield curve. When measuring assets, fair values of plan assets as of the last business day of
the financial year are used for accounting purposes; whereas ERISA funding rules allow for asset smoothing that averages fair values over periods as long as two years with limited expected returns included in the averaging. The approach
applied by ERISA for the regulatory funding valuation minimizes the impact of sharp changes in asset values and corporate bond yields in volatile markets.
Healthcare benefits for both management and formerly union represented retirees benefits are capped for those who retired after February 28, 1990. The
benefit obligation associated with this group of retirees is approximately 49% of the total United States retiree healthcare obligation as of December 31, 2016. Medicare is the primary payer for those aged 65 and older, comprising almost
all of uncapped retirees.
|
|
|
NOKIA ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 20-F 2016 |
|
197 |
Notes to consolidated financial statements continued
Benefit payments
The following table
summarizes expected benefit payments from the pension and post-retirement plans and other post-employment benefit plans until 2026. Actual benefit payments may differ from expected benefit payments. The amounts for the United States plans are net of
expected plan participant contributions, as well as the annual Medicare Part D subsidy of approximately EUR 21 million.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
United States direct benefit payments |
|
|
|
|
Other countries |
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
Pension |
|
|
|
|
Post-retirement |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Qualified |
|
|
Qualified |
|
|
Non-qualified |
|
|
|
|
Formerly union |
|
|
Non-union |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EURm |
|
management |
|
|
occupational |
|
|
plans |
|
|
|
|
represented |
|
|
represented |
|
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2017 |
|
|
1 302 |
|
|
|
324 |
|
|
|
29 |
|
|
|
|
|
127 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
85 |
|
|
|
|
|
299 |
|
|
|
|
|
2 178 |
|
2018 |
|
|
1 232 |
|
|
|
311 |
|
|
|
28 |
|
|
|
|
|
114 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
86 |
|
|
|
|
|
256 |
|
|
|
|
|
2 039 |
|
2019 |
|
|
1 196 |
|
|
|
299 |
|
|
|
28 |
|
|
|
|
|
109 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
88 |
|
|
|
|
|
259 |
|
|
|
|
|
1 991 |
|
2020 |
|
|
1 160 |
|
|
|
286 |
|
|
|
27 |
|
|
|
|
|
139 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
89 |
|
|
|
|
|
262 |
|
|
|
|
|
1 975 |
|
2021 |
|
|
1 124 |
|
|
|
274 |
|
|
|
27 |
|
|
|
|
|
131 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
90 |
|
|
|
|
|
285 |
|
|
|
|
|
1 943 |
|
2022-2026 |
|
|
5 069 |
|
|
|
1 182 |
|
|
|
128 |
|
|
|
|
|
514 |
|
|
|
59 |
|
|
|
462 |
|
|
|
|
|
1 450 |
|
|
|
|
|
8 864 |
|
Benefit payments are paid from plan assets where plans are fully funded. Funding mechanisms, such as the Section 420 transfer, are
further utilized to minimize direct benefit payments for underfunded United States Opeb liabilities. Direct benefit payments expected to be paid in 2017 total EUR 119 million.
28. Accrued expenses, deferred revenue and other liabilities
Non-current liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EURm |
|
2016 |
|
|
2015 |
|
Advance payments and deferred revenue(1) |
|
|
1 171 |
|
|
|
1 235 |
|
Salaries, wages and social charges |
|
|
138 |
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
144 |
|
|
|
19 |
|
Total |
|
|
1 453 |
|
|
|
1 254 |
|
(1) Includes
a prepayment of EUR 1 080 million (EUR 1 235 million in 2015) relating to a ten-year mutual patent license agreement with Microsoft. Refer to Note 6, Disposals treated as Discontinued operations.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EURm |
|
2016 |
|
|
2015 |
|
Advance payments and deferred revenue |
|
|
3 178 |
|
|
|
1 857 |
|
Salaries, wages and social charges |
|
|
1 576 |
|
|
|
891 |
|
VAT and other indirect taxes |
|
|
362 |
|
|
|
164 |
|
Other |
|
|
1 296 |
|
|
|
483 |
|
Total |
|
|
6 412 |
|
|
|
3 395 |
|
Other accruals include accrued royalties, research and development expenses, marketing expenses and interest expenses, as well as
various amounts which are individually insignificant.
|
|
|
198 |
|
NOKIA ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 20-F 2016 |
29. Provisions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EURm |
|
Restructuring |
|
|
Warranty |
|
|
Litigation |
|
|
Environmental |
|
|
Project losses |
|
|
Divestment- related |
|
|
Material liability |
|
|
Other |
|
|
Total |
|
As of January 1,
2015 |
|
|
247 |
|
|
|
117 |
|
|
|
68 |
|
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
107 |
|
|
|
137 |
|
|
|
24 |
|
|
|
157 |
|
|
|
873 |
|
Disposal of businesses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
(5 |
) |
Translation differences |
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
(11 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(12 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
(18 |
) |
Reclassification |
|
|
(15 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6 |
) |
Charged to income statement: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional provisions |
|
|
105 |
|
|
|
31 |
|
|
|
24 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
49 |
|
|
|
46 |
|
|
|
42 |
|
|
|
302 |
|
Changes in estimates |
|
|
(14 |
) |
|
|
(21 |
) |
|
|
(11 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(25 |
) |
|
|
(22 |
) |
|
|
(20 |
) |
|
|
(18 |
) |
|
|
(131 |
) |
Total charged to income statement |
|
|
91 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(20 |
) |
|
|
27 |
|
|
|
26 |
|
|
|
24 |
|
|
|
171 |
|
Utilized during
year(1) |
|
|
(125 |
) |
|
|
(35 |
) |
|
|
(13 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(25 |
) |
|
|
(17 |
) |
|
|
(21 |
) |
|
|
(54 |
) |
|
|
(290 |
) |
As of December 31,
2015 |
|
|
194 |
|
|
|
94 |
|
|
|
69 |
|
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
62 |
|
|
|
129 |
|
|
|
29 |
|
|
|
132 |
|
|
|
725 |
|
Acquisitions through business combinations |
|
|
291 |
|
|
|
135 |
|
|
|
100 |
|
|
|
114 |
|
|
|
180 |
|
|
|
26 |
|
|
|
31 |
|
|
|
366 |
|
|
|
1 243 |
|
Translation differences |
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
22 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
41 |
|
Reclassification |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
(7 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Charged to income statement: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional provisions |
|
|
874 |
|
|
|
121 |
|
|
|
75 |
|
|
|
28 |
|
|
|
44 |
|
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
57 |
|
|
|
325 |
|
|
|
1 540 |
|
Changes in estimates |
|
|
(123 |
) |
|
|
(38 |
) |
|
|
(31 |
) |
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
(31 |
) |
|
|
(24 |
) |
|
|
(21 |
) |
|
|
(104 |
) |
|
|
(374 |
) |
Total charged to income statement |
|
|
751 |
|
|
|
83 |
|
|
|
44 |
|
|
|
26 |
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
(8 |
) |
|
|
36 |
|
|
|
221 |
|
|
|
1 166 |
|
Utilized during
year(2) |
|
|
(525 |
) |
|
|
(106 |
) |
|
|
(60 |
) |
|
|
(26 |
) |
|
|
(124 |
) |
|
|
(44 |
) |
|
|
(22 |
) |
|
|
(288 |
) |
|
|
(1 195 |
) |
As of December 31,
2016 |
|
|
713 |
|
|
|
207 |
|
|
|
183 |
|
|
|
134 |
|
|
|
131 |
|
|
|
110 |
|
|
|
77 |
|
|
|
425 |
|
|
|
1 980 |
|
(1) |
The utilization of restructuring provision includes items transferred to accrued expenses, of which EUR 7 million remained in accrued expenses as of December 31, 2015. |
(2) |
The utilization of restructuring provision includes items transferred to accrued expenses, of which EUR 62 million remained in accrued expenses as of December 31, 2016. The utilization of project losses
includes EUR 7 million transferred to inventory write-downs. The utilization of other provisions includes items transferred to accrued expenses, of which EUR 7 million remained in accrued expenses as of December 31, 2016.
|
The restructuring provision includes personnel and other restructuring-related costs, such as real estate exit costs. On April 6, 2016, the
Group expanded its restructuring activities and launched a new cost savings program, recognizing a EUR 677 million restructuring provision. The utilization during the year was EUR 210 million, of which EUR 58 million remained in
accrued expenses as of December 31, 2016. In addition, the restructuring provision includes EUR 257 million relating to previously announced restructuring programs. The majority of the restructuring related cash outflows are expected
to occur over the next two years.
The warranty provision relates to sold products. Cash outflows related to the warranty provision are generally expected to occur
within the next 18 months.
The litigation provision includes estimated potential future settlements for litigation. Cash outflows related to the litigation
provision are inherently uncertain and generally occur over several periods.
The environmental provision includes estimated costs to sufficiently clean and
refurbish contaminated sites, to the extent necessary, and where necessary, continuing surveillance at sites where the environmental remediation exposure is less significant. Cash outflows related to the environmental liability are inherently
uncertain and generally occur over several periods.
The project loss provision is based on IAS 11, Construction Contracts, and relates to onerous customer
contracts. Cash outflows related to the project loss provision are generally expected to occur over the next 12 months.
The divestment-related provision relates to
the sale of businesses, and includes certain liabilities where the Group is required to indemnify the buyer. Cash outflows related to the divestment-related provision are inherently uncertain.
The material liability provision relates to non-cancellable purchase commitments with suppliers. Cash outflows related to the material liability provision are expected
to occur over the next 12 months.
Other provisions include provisions for various contractual obligations and other obligations. Cash outflows related to other
provisions are generally expected to occur over the next two years.
|
|
|
NOKIA ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 20-F 2016 |
|
199 |
Notes to consolidated financial statements continued
Legal matters
A number of Group companies are and will likely continue to
be subject to various legal proceedings and investigations that arise from time to time, including proceedings regarding intellectual property, product liability, sales and marketing practices, commercial disputes, employment, and wrongful
discharge, antitrust, securities, health and safety, environmental, tax, international trade, and privacy matters. As a result, the Group may incur substantial costs that may not be covered by insurance and could affect business and reputation.
While management does not expect any of these legal proceedings to have a material adverse effect on the Groups financial position, litigation is inherently unpredictable and the Group may in the future incur judgments or enter into
settlements that could have a material adverse effect on the results of operations and cash flows.
Litigation and proceedings
Irish Broadband
In 2010, the
Imagine group (IBB Internet Services & Irish Broadband Internet Services trading as Imagine Networks) (IBB) served a claim in the commercial court of Ireland for breach of contract and tort against Motorola Limited.
The claim was later amended to add Imagine Communications Group as an additional plaintiff. In 2011, Nokia Siemens Networks acquired certain assets and liabilities including this matter from Motorola Solutions Inc. (Motorola). Among
other things, IBB claims that WiMax network equipment purchased from Motorola failed to perform as promised. The Group disputes these allegations. In 2015, the same claim was made against the Group directly for any amount of the claim that is deemed
irrecoverable against Motorola by virtue of the assignment. The case was settled in 2016.
Vertu
The Group divested the United Kingdom-based luxury handset business, Vertu, to Crown Bidco Ltd in 2013. In 2014, Crown Bidco Ltd served a claim in the Commercial
Court in London alleging breach of contract in relation to the transfer of IT assets and breach of warranties under the sale agreement. The Group disputes these allegations. In January 2016, the Group discovered material which allowed it to serve a
counterclaim naming Crown Bidco and other third parties from EQT (the financier behind Crown Bidco) as defendants. The trial is expected in 2017.
Mass labor litigation Brazil
The Group is defending against a substantial number of labor claims in various Brazilian labor courts.
Plaintiffs are former employees whose contracts were terminated after the Group exited from certain managed services contracts. The claims mainly relate to payments made under, or in connection with, the terminated labor contracts. The Group has
closed the majority of the court cases through settlement or judgement. Closure of the remaining open cases is expected to occur within the next several years.
Asbestos litigation in the United States
The Group is defending approximately 400 asbestos-related matters, at various stages of
litigation, originating from Alcatel Lucent entities. The claims are based on premises liability, products liability, and contractor liability. The claims also involve plaintiffs allegedly diagnosed with various diseases, including but not
limited to asbestosis, lung cancer, and mesothelioma.
Intellectual property rights litigation
Apple
On December 21, 2016 , the Group
commenced patent infringement proceedings against Apple in Asia, Europe and the United States. Across actions in 11 countries, more than 50 Nokia patents are now in suit, covering a range of technologies, such as display, user interface, software,
antenna, chipsets and video coding as well as 3G and 4G cellular standards. Schedules for the various actions are yet to be set.
LG
Electronics
In 2015, LG Electronics agreed to take a royalty-bearing smartphone patent license from Nokia Technologies. The detailed royalty payment
obligations are subject to arbitration, which is expected to conclude by the end of 2018. Terms of the agreement are confidential.
|
|
|
200 |
|
NOKIA ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 20-F 2016 |
30. Commitments and contingencies
Contractual obligations
Payments due for contractual obligations as of
December 31, 2016 by due date:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EURm |
|
Within 1 year |
|
|
1 to 3 years |
|
|
4 to 5 years |
|
|
More than 5 years |
|
|
Total |
|
Purchase obligations(1) |
|
|
2 075 |
|
|
|
616 |
|
|
|
122 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
2 816 |
|
Operating
leases(2) |
|
|
259 |
|
|
|
386 |
|
|
|
236 |
|
|
|
260 |
|
|
|
1 141 |
|
Total |
|
|
2 334 |
|
|
|
1 002 |
|
|
|
358 |
|
|
|
263 |
|
|
|
3 957 |
|
(1) |
Includes inventory purchase obligations, service agreements and outsourcing arrangements. |
(2) |
Includes leasing costs for office, manufacturing and warehouse space under various non-cancellable operating leases. Certain contracts contain renewal options for various periods of time. |
Guarantees and other contingent commitments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EURm |
|
2016 |
|
|
2015 |
|
Collateral for own commitments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets pledged |
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
Contingent liabilities on behalf of Group companies(1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Guarantees issued by financial institutions |
|
|
1 805 |
|
|
|
398 |
|
Other guarantees |
|
|
794 |
|
|
|
129 |
|
Contingent liabilities on behalf of associated companies and joint
ventures |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial guarantees |
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
15 |
|
Contingent liabilities on behalf of other companies |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial guarantees |
|
|
|
|
|
|
6 |
|
Other guarantees |
|
|
135 |
|
|
|
137 |
|
Financing commitments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Customer finance commitments(2) |
|
|
223 |
|
|
|
180 |
|
Venture fund commitments(3) |
|
|
525 |
|
|
|
230 |
|
(1) |
Includes guarantees to third parties in the normal course of business. These are mainly guarantees given by financial institutions to the Groups customers for the performance of the Groups obligations under
supply agreements, including tender bonds, performance bonds, and warranty bonds issued by financial institutions on behalf of the Group. Depending on the nature of the guarantee, compensation is either payable on demand, or subject to verification
of non-performance. Additionally, the Group has issued corporate guarantees with primary obligation given directly to customers. These guarantees have been issued by Nokia Corporation for EUR 88 million (EUR 74 million at
December 31, 2015), as well as by certain Alcatel Lucent entities for EUR 1 520 million. In Other guarantees, the Group reports guarantees related to non-commercial contracts that support business activities. As a result of internal
policies and active management of outstanding guarantee exposure, the Group has not been subject to any material guarantee claims during recent years. |
(2) |
Customer finance commitments are available under loan facilities negotiated with customers. Availability of the facility is dependent upon the borrowers continuing compliance with the agreed financial and
operational covenants, and compliance with other administrative terms of the facility. The loan facilities are primarily available to fund capital expenditure relating to purchases of network infrastructure equipment and services. Refer to Note
36, Risk management. |
(3) |
On February 21, 2016, Nokia Growth Partners announced the closing of a new USD 350 million fund for investments in Internet of Things companies. The Group sponsors the fund and will serve to identify new
opportunities to grow the ecosystem in these solutions. As a limited partner in Nokia Growth Partners and certain other funds making technology-related investments, the Group is committed to capital contributions and entitled to cash
distributions according to the respective partnership agreements and underlying fund activities. |
The amounts represent the maximum principal amount
for commitments and contingencies.
|
|
|
NOKIA ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 20-F 2016 |
|
201 |
Notes to consolidated financial statements continued
31. Notes to the consolidated statement of cash flows
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EURm |
|
2016 |
|
|
2015 |
|
|
2014 |
|
Adjustments
for(1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
1 594 |
|
|
|
320 |
|
|
|
297 |
|
Share-based payment |
|
|
113 |
|
|
|
49 |
|
|
|
37 |
|
Impairment charges |
|
|
125 |
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
1 335 |
|
Restructuring charges(3) |
|
|
751 |
|
|
|
48 |
|
|
|
115 |
|
Profit on sale of property, plant and equipment and available-for-sale investments |
|
|
(82 |
) |
|
|
(132 |
) |
|
|
(56 |
) |
Transfer from hedging reserve to sales and cost of sales |
|
|
27 |
|
|
|
61 |
|
|
|
(10 |
) |
Share of results of associated companies and joint ventures (Note 34) |
|
|
(18 |
) |
|
|
(29 |
) |
|
|
12 |
|
Financial income and expenses |
|
|
308 |
|
|
|
211 |
|
|
|
600 |
|
Income tax (benefit)/expense |
|
|
(429 |
) |
|
|
338 |
|
|
|
(1 281 |
) |
Gain on the sale of businesses(2) |
|
|
(14 |
) |
|
|
(1 178 |
) |
|
|
(3 386 |
) |
Other income and expenses |
|
|
32 |
|
|
|
40 |
|
|
|
75 |
|
Total |
|
|
2 407 |
|
|
|
(261 |
) |
|
|
(2 262 |
) |
Change in net working capital |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Decrease/(increase) in short-term receivables |
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
(728 |
) |
|
|
52 |
|
Decrease/(increase) in inventories |
|
|
533 |
|
|
|
341 |
|
|
|
(462 |
) |
(Decrease)/increase in interest-free short-term
liabilities |
|
|
(2 758 |
) |
|
|
(990 |
) |
|
|
1 398 |
|
Total |
|
|
(2 207 |
) |
|
|
(1 377 |
) |
|
|
988 |
|
(1) |
Includes Continuing and Discontinued operations. Refer to Note 6, Disposals treated as Discontinued operations. |
(2) |
In 2014, impairment charges, foreign exchange differences, taxes and other adjustments relating to the Sale of the D&S Business were presented separately from the gain. |
(3) |
Adjustments represent the non-cash portion of the restructuring charges recognized in the consolidated income statement. |
In 2016, the purchase consideration in relation to the Acquisition of Alcatel Lucent comprises the issuance of new Nokia shares in addition to cash payments. Refer to
Note 5, Acquisitions. In 2015, the Group exercised its option to redeem EUR 750 million convertible bonds at their principal amount outstanding plus accrued interest. Virtually all bondholders elected to convert their convertible bonds into
Nokia shares before redemption. The conversion did not have a cash impact. In 2014, the convertible bonds issued to Microsoft in 2013 have been netted against the proceeds from the Sale of the D&S Business.
32. Principal Group companies
The Groups significant subsidiaries as of December 31, 2016:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Company name |
|
Country of incorporation
and place of business |
|
Primary nature of business |
|
Parent holding % |
|
|
Group ownership
interest % |
|
Nokia Solutions and Networks B.V. |
|
The Hague, Netherlands |
|
Holding company |
|
|
|
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
Nokia Solutions and Networks Oy |
|
Helsinki, Finland |
|
Sales and manufacturing company |
|
|
|
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
Nokia Solutions and Networks US LLC |
|
Delaware, USA |
|
Sales company |
|
|
|
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
Nokia Solutions and Networks Japan Corp. |
|
Tokyo, Japan |
|
Sales company |
|
|
|
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
Nokia Solutions and Networks India Private Limited |
|
New Delhi, India |
|
Sales and manufacturing company |
|
|
|
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
Nokia Solutions and Networks System Technology (Beijing) Co., Ltd. |
|
Beijing, China |
|
Sales company |
|
|
|
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
Nokia Solutions and Networks Branch Operations Oy |
|
Helsinki, Finland |
|
Sales company |
|
|
|
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
PT Nokia Solutions and Networks Indonesia |
|
Jakarta, Indonesia |
|
Sales company |
|
|
|
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
Nokia Solutions and Networks Taiwan Co., Ltd. |
|
Taipei, Taiwan |
|
Sales company |
|
|
|
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
Nokia Solutions and Networks Spain S.L. |
|
Madrid, Spain |
|
Sales company |
|
|
|
|
|
|
99.9 |
|
Alcatel Lucent SA |
|
Boulogne-Billancourt, France |
|
Holding company |
|
|
100.0 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
Alcatel-Lucent Participations SA |
|
Boulogne-Billancourt, France |
|
Holding company |
|
|
|
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
Alcatel-Lucent USA Inc. |
|
Delaware, USA |
|
Sales company |
|
|
|
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
Alcatel-Lucent Shanghai Bell Co., Ltd(1) |
|
Shanghai, China |
|
Sales and manufacturing company |
|
|
|
|
|
|
50.0 |
|
Alcatel-Lucent International SAS |
|
Boulogne-Billancourt, France |
|
Sales company |
|
|
|
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
Alcatel-Lucent Submarine Networks SAS |
|
Boulogne-Billancourt, France |
|
Sales and manufacturing company |
|
|
|
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
Alcatel-Lucent Bell NV |
|
Antwerp, Belgium |
|
Sales company |
|
|
|
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
Alcatel-Lucent Telecom Limited |
|
Bristol, UK |
|
Sales company |
|
|
|
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
Alcatel-Lucent Canada Inc. |
|
Ottawa, Canada |
|
Sales company |
|
|
|
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
Alcatel-Lucent España S.A. |
|
Madrid, Spain |
|
Sales company |
|
|
|
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
Alcatel-Lucent Italia SPA |
|
Milan, Italy |
|
Sales company |
|
|
|
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
Nokia Finance International B.V. |
|
Haarlem, Netherlands |
|
Holding company |
|
|
100.0 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
Nokia Technologies Oy |
|
Helsinki, Finland |
|
Sales and development company |
|
|
100.0 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
(1) |
The Group owns 50% plus one share in Alcatel-Lucent Shanghai Bell Co., Ltd, the other shareholder being China Huaxin, an entity controlled by the Chinese government. Refer to Note 33, Significant partly-owned
subsidiaries. |
|
|
|
202 |
|
NOKIA ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 20-F 2016 |
33. Significant partly-owned subsidiaries
In 2016, the Group acquired a partly owned consolidated subsidiary, Alcatel-Lucent Shanghai Bell Co., Ltd, which has a non-controlling interest (50% less one share)
that is material to the Group. Alcatel-Lucent Shanghai Bell Co., Ltd, a company incorporated in China, which, with its subsidiaries in China and in the rest of the world, including the RFS Group, make up the Alcatel-Lucent Shanghai Bell Group.
Financial information for the Alcatel-Lucent Shanghai Bell Group(1):
|
|
|
|
|
EURm |
|
2016 |
|
Summarized income statement |
|
|
|
|
Net sales(2) |
|
|
1 806 |
|
Operating loss |
|
|
(136 |
) |
Loss for the year |
|
|
(89 |
) |
Loss for the year attributable to: |
|
|
|
|
Equity holders of the parent |
|
|
(45 |
) |
Non-controlling interests |
|
|
(45 |
) |
Summarized statement of financial position |
|
|
|
|
Non-current assets |
|
|
424 |
|
Non-current liabilities |
|
|
(128 |
) |
Non-current net assets |
|
|
296 |
|
Current assets(3) |
|
|
2 841 |
|
Current liabilities |
|
|
(1 657 |
) |
Current net assets |
|
|
1 184 |
|
Net assets(4) |
|
|
1 480 |
|
Non-controlling interests |
|
|
775 |
|
Summarized statement of cash flows |
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in operating activities |
|
|
(182 |
) |
Net cash from investing activities |
|
|
89 |
|
Net cash used in financing activities |
|
|
(24 |
) |
Net decrease in cash and cash
equivalents |
|
|
(117 |
) |
(1) |
Financial information for the Alcatel-Lucent Shanghai Bell Group is presented before eliminations of intercompany transactions with the rest of the Group but after eliminations of intercompany transactions between
entities within the Alcatel-Lucent Shanghai Bell Group. |
(2) |
Includes EUR 483 million net sales to other Group entities. |
(3) |
Includes a total of EUR 1 284 million of cash and cash equivalents and available-for-sale investments, liquid assets. |
(4) |
The distribution of the profits of Alcatel-Lucent Shanghai Bell Co., Ltd requires the passing of a special resolution by more than two-thirds of its shareholders, subject to a requirement that at least 50% of the
after-tax distributable profits are distributed as dividends each year. |
34. Investments in
associated companies and joint ventures
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EURm |
|
2016 |
|
|
2015 |
|
Net carrying amount as of January 1 |
|
|
84 |
|
|
|
51 |
|
Translation differences |
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
6 |
|
Acquisitions through business combinations |
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
|
|
Disposals |
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Share of results |
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
29 |
|
Dividends |
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
(2 |
) |
Net carrying amount as of
December 31 |
|
|
116 |
|
|
|
84 |
|
Shareholdings in associated companies and joint ventures comprise investments in unlisted companies.
|
|
|
NOKIA ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 20-F 2016 |
|
203 |
Notes to consolidated financial statements continued
35. Related party transactions
The Group has related party transactions with a pension fund, associated companies, joint ventures and other entities where the Group has significant influence, as well
as the management and the Board of Directors. Transactions and balances with companies over which the Group exercises control are eliminated on consolidation. Refer to Note 2, Significant accounting policies, and Note 32, Principal Group
companies.
Transactions with pension fund
The Group has borrowings of
EUR 69 million (EUR 69 million in 2015) from Nokia Unterstützungsgesellschaft GmbH, the Groups German pension fund, a separate legal entity. The loan bears interest at the rate of 6% per annum and its duration is pending
until further notice by the loan counterparties even though they have the right to terminate the loan with a 90-day notice. The loan is included in short-term interest-bearing liabilities in the consolidated statement of financial
position.
Transactions with associated companies, joint ventures and other entities where the Group has significant influence
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EURm |
|
2016 |
|
|
2015 |
|
|
2014 |
|
Share of results |
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
29 |
|
|
|
(12 |
) |
Dividend income |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
Share of shareholders equity |
|
|
116 |
|
|
|
84 |
|
|
|
51 |
|
Sales |
|
|
62 |
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
1 |
|
Purchases |
|
|
(322 |
) |
|
|
(233 |
) |
|
|
(305 |
) |
Receivables |
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payables |
|
|
(38 |
) |
|
|
(37 |
) |
|
|
(35 |
) |
The Group has guaranteed a loan of EUR 11 million (EUR 15 million in 2015) for an associated company.
Management compensation
Compensation information for the President and CEO:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EUR |
|
|
Base salary/
fee |
(1) |
|
|
Cash incentive
payments |
|
|
|
Share-based
payment expenses |
(2) |
|
|
Pension
expenses |
|
2016 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rajeev Suri, President and CEO |
|
|
1 049 044 |
|
|
|
780 357 |
|
|
|
5 296 960 |
|
|
|
469 737 |
|
2015 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rajeev Suri, President and CEO |
|
|
1 000 000 |
|
|
|
1 922 195 |
|
|
|
4 604 622 |
|
|
|
491 641 |
|
2014 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rajeev Suri, President and CEO from May 1, 2014 |
|
|
666 667 |
|
|
|
1 778 105 |
|
|
|
3 896 308 |
|
|
|
366 989 |
|
Risto Siilasmaa, Interim CEO from September 3, 2013 to May 1, 2014(3) |
|
|
1 126 323 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
191 475 |
|
Timo Ihamuotila, Interim President from September 3, 2013 to May
1, 2014(4) |
|
|
100 000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
72 643 |
|
|
|
17 000 |
|
(1) |
Base salaries are pro-rated for the time in role. Incentive payments represent full-year incentive payment earned under the Groups short-term incentive programs. For interim roles, the base salary/fee is for
role-related responsibilities only. |
(2) |
Represents the expense for all outstanding equity grants recorded during 2016. |
(3) |
Represents the value of 200 000 shares awarded as compensation for additional responsibilities, the balance of which was given in shares after deducting associated taxes and social security contributions.
|
(4) |
Includes EUR 100 000 as compensation for additional responsibilities. Also includes an equity grant with an approximate aggregate grant date value of EUR 250 000 in the form of Nokia stock options and Nokia
restricted shares. These grants are subject to the standard terms and conditions and vesting schedules of the Groups equity plans. Refer to Note 26, Share-based payment. |
Total remuneration awarded to the Group Leadership Team for their time as members of the Group Leadership Team:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EURm |
|
2016 |
|
|
2015 |
|
|
2014 |
|
Short-term benefits |
|
|
26 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
Post-employment benefits(1) |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
Share-based payment(2) |
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
(3 |
) |
Termination
benefits(3) |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
36 |
|
Total |
|
|
43 |
|
|
|
22 |
|
|
|
42 |
|
(1) |
The members of the Group Leadership Team participate in the local retirement programs applicable to employees in the country where they reside. |
(2) |
Due to the significant changes in the Group Leadership Team during 2014, following the Sale of the D&S Business, share-based payment for 2014 reflects cumulative expense reversal for lapsed equity awards.
|
(3) |
Includes both termination payments and payments made under exceptional contractual arrangements for lapsed equity awards. Includes payments to former leadership members that left the Group in 2015.
|
|
|
|
204 |
|
NOKIA ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 20-F 2016 |
Board of Directors compensation
The annual remuneration paid to the
members of the Board of Directors, as decided by the Annual General Meetings in the respective years:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2016 |
|
|
|
|
|
2015 |
|
|
|
|
|
2014 |
|
|
|
|
Gross annual
fee
EUR |
(1) |
|
|
Shares received number |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross annual fee EUR |
(1) |
|
|
Shares received number |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross annual fee EUR |
(1) |
|
|
Shares received number |
|
Risto Siilasmaa, Chair(2) |
|
|
440 000 |
|
|
|
35 001 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
440 000 |
|
|
|
29 339 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
440 000 |
|
|
|
31 186 |
|
Olivier Piou, Vice Chair(3) |
|
|
255 082 |
|
|
|
19 892 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vivek Badrinath(4) |
|
|
175 000 |
|
|
|
13 921 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
140 000 |
|
|
|
9 333 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
140 000 |
|
|
|
9 922 |
|
Bruce Brown(5) |
|
|
190 000 |
|
|
|
15 114 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
155 000 |
|
|
|
10 333 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
155 000 |
|
|
|
10 986 |
|
Elisabeth Doherty(6) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
140 000 |
|
|
|
9 333 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
140 000 |
|
|
|
9 922 |
|
Louis R. Hughes(7) |
|
|
240 410 |
|
|
|
18 752 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Simon Jiang(8) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
130 000 |
|
|
|
8 666 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jouko Karvinen(9) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
175 000 |
|
|
|
11 667 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
175 000 |
|
|
|
12 403 |
|
Mårten Mickos(10) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
130 000 |
|
|
|
9 214 |
|
Jean C. Monty(11) |
|
|
225 410 |
|
|
|
17 558 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Elizabeth Nelson(12) |
|
|
190 000 |
|
|
|
15 114 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
140 000 |
|
|
|
9 333 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
140 000 |
|
|
|
9 922 |
|
Carla Smits-Nusteling(13) |
|
|
175 000 |
|
|
|
13 921 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Kari Stadigh(14) |
|
|
160 000 |
|
|
|
12 727 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
130 000 |
|
|
|
8 666 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
130 000 |
|
|
|
9 214 |
|
Dennis
Strigl(10) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
130 000 |
|
|
|
9 214 |
|
Total |
|
|
2 050 902 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 450 000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 580 000 |
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
Approximately 40% of each Board members annual compensation is paid in Nokia shares purchased from the market, and the remaining approximately 60% is paid in cash. The meeting fees, as resolved by the Annual
General Meeting in 2016, will be paid in cash in 2017 and are not included in the table above. |
(2) |
Represents compensation paid for services as the Chair of the Board. Excludes compensation paid for services as the Interim CEO in 2014. Refer to the management compensation section above. |
(3) |
Consists of EUR 70 082 for services as the Vice Chair of the Board from January 8, 2016 until the Annual General Meeting in 2016 and EUR 185 000 for services as the Vice Chair of the Board from the Annual General
Meeting in 2016. |
(4) |
Consists of EUR 160 000 for services as a member of the Board and EUR 15 000 for services as a member of the Audit Committee. Mr. Badrinath resigned on July 29, 2016 and has returned the compensation paid to
him. |
(5) |
Consists of EUR 160 000 for services as a member of the Board and EUR 30 000 for services as the Chair of the Personnel Committee. |
(6) |
Served as a member of the Audit Committee and a member of the Board until January 8, 2016. |
(7) |
Consists of EUR 60 738 for services as a member of the Board and EUR 4 672 for services as a member of the Audit Committee from January 8, 2016 until the Annual General Meeting in 2016; and EUR 160 000
for services as a member of the Board and EUR 15 000 for services as a member of the Audit Committee from the Annual General Meeting in 2016. |
(8) |
Served as a member of the Board until the Annual General Meeting in 2016. |
(9) |
Served as the Vice Chair of the Board until January 8, 2016, the Chair of the Audit Committee until April 1, 2016, and as a member of the Board until the Annual General Meeting in 2016. |
(10) |
Served as a member of the Board until the Annual General Meeting in 2015. |
(11) |
Consists of EUR 60 738 for services as a member of the Board and EUR 4 672 for services as a member of the Audit Committee from January 8, 2016 until the Annual General Meeting in 2016; and EUR 160 000 for
services as a member of the Board from the Annual General Meeting in 2016. |
(12) |
Consists of EUR 160 000 for services as a member of the Board and EUR 30 000 for services as the Chair of the Audit Committee. |
(13) |
Consists of EUR 160 000 for services as a member of the Board and EUR 15 000 for services as a member of the Audit Committee from the Annual General Meeting in 2016. |
(14) |
Consists of EUR 160 000 for services as a member of the Board. |
Transactions with the Group Leadership Team and the
Board of Directors
No loans were granted to the members of the Group Leadership Team and the Board of Directors in 2016, 2015 or 2014.
Terms of termination of employment of the President and CEO
The President
and CEO, Rajeev Suri, may terminate his service contract at any time with six months prior notice. The Group may terminate his service contract for reasons other than cause at any time with an 18 months notice period. If there is a
change of control event as defined in Mr. Suris service contract and the service contract is terminated either by the Group or its successor without cause, or by him for good reason, he would be entitled to a severance payment
equaling up to 18 months of compensation and cash payment of the pro-rated value of his outstanding unvested equity awards, if he is dismissed within 18 months of the change in control event.
|
|
|
NOKIA ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 20-F 2016 |
|
205 |
Notes to consolidated financial statements continued
36. Risk management
General risk management principles
The Group has a systematic and
structured approach to risk management across business operations and processes. Key risks and opportunities are identified primarily against business targets either in business operations or as an integral part of financial planning. Key risks and
opportunities are analyzed, managed, monitored and identified as part of business performance management with the support of risk management personnel. The Groups overall risk management concept is based on managing the key risks that
would prevent the Group from meeting its objectives, rather than solely focusing on eliminating risks. The principles documented in the Nokia Enterprise Risk Management Policy, approved by the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors, require risk
management and its elements to be integrated into key processes. One of the main principles is that the business or function head is also the risk owner, although all employees are responsible for identifying, analyzing and managing risks as
appropriate to their roles and duties. Risk management covers strategic, operational, financial and hazard risks. Key risks and opportunities are reviewed by the Group Leadership Team and the Board of Directors in order to create visibility on
business risks as well as to enable prioritization of risk management activities. In addition to the principles defined in the Nokia Enterprise Risk Management Policy, specific risk management implementation is reflected in other key policies.
Financial risks
The objective for treasury activities is to guarantee
sufficient funding at all times and to identify, evaluate and manage financial risks. Treasury activities support this aim by mitigating the adverse effects on the profitability of the underlying business caused by fluctuations in the financial
markets, and by managing the capital structure by balancing the levels of liquid assets and financial borrowings. Treasury activities are governed by the Nokia Treasury Policy approved by the Group President and CEO which provides principles for
overall financial risk management and determines the allocation of responsibilities for financial risk management activities. Operating procedures approved by the Group CFO cover specific areas such as foreign exchange risk, interest rate risk,
credit and liquidity risk as well as the use of derivative financial instruments in managing these risks. The Group is risk averse in its treasury activities.
Financial risks are divided into market risk covering foreign exchange risk, interest rate risk and equity price risk; credit risk covering business-related credit risk
and financial credit risk; and liquidity risk.
Market risk
Foreign exchange risk
The Group operates globally and is exposed to transaction and translation foreign exchange risks. Transaction
risk arises from foreign currency denominated assets and liabilities together with foreign currency denominated future cash flows. Transaction exposures are managed in the context of various functional currencies of Group companies. Material
transactional foreign exchange exposures are hedged, unless hedging would be uneconomical due to market liquidity and/or hedging cost. Exposures are defined using transaction nominal values. Exposures are mainly hedged with derivative financial
instruments, such as forward foreign exchange contracts and foreign exchange options. The majority of financial instruments hedging foreign exchange risk have a duration of less than a year. The Group does not hedge forecast foreign currency
cash flows beyond two years.
As the Group has entities where the functional currency is other than the euro, the shareholders equity is exposed to
fluctuations in foreign exchange rates. Equity changes caused by movements in foreign exchange rates are shown as currency translation differences in the consolidated financial statements. The Group may use forward foreign exchange contracts,
foreign exchange options and foreign currency denominated loans to hedge its foreign exchange exposure arising from foreign net investments.
Currencies that
represent a significant portion of the currency mix in outstanding financial instruments as of December 31 are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EURm |
|
USD |
|
|
JPY |
|
|
CNY |
|
|
GBP |
|
2016 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign exchange derivatives used as cash flow hedges,
net(1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(158 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign exchange derivatives used as fair value hedges,
net(2) |
|
|
(397 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
103 |
|
Foreign exchange derivatives used as net investment hedges,
net(3) |
|
|
(1 418 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(249 |
) |
Foreign exchange exposure from statement of financial position items, net |
|
|
(2 172 |
) |
|
|
434 |
|
|
|
(227 |
) |
|
|
(322 |
) |
Foreign exchange derivatives not designated in a hedge relationship, carried at fair value through profit
and loss, net(4) |
|
|
1 747 |
|
|
|
(174 |
) |
|
|
(587 |
) |
|
|
259 |
|
Cross-currency/interest rate hedges |
|
|
1 051 |
|
|
|
(328 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2015 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign exchange derivatives used as cash flow hedges,
net(1) |
|
|
(465 |
) |
|
|
(262 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign exchange derivatives used as net investment hedges,
net(3) |
|
|
(296 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign exchange exposure from statement of financial position items, net |
|
|
(1 004 |
) |
|
|
910 |
|
|
|
32 |
|
|
|
(97 |
) |
Foreign exchange derivatives not designated in a hedge relationship, carried at fair value through profit
and loss, net(4) |
|
|
(226 |
) |
|
|
(559 |
) |
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
90 |
|
Cross-currency/interest rate hedges |
|
|
1 001 |
|
|
|
(311 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
Used to hedge the foreign exchange risk from forecasted highly probable cash flows related to sales, purchases and business acquisition activities. In some currencies, especially the U.S. dollar, the Group has
substantial foreign exchange risks in both estimated cash inflows and outflows. The underlying exposures for which these hedges are entered into are not presented in the table as they are not financial instruments. |
(2) |
Used to hedge foreign exchange risk from contractual firm commitments. The underlying exposures for which these hedges are entered into are not presented in the table as they are not financial instruments.
|
(3) |
Used to hedge net investment exposure. The underlying exposures for which these hedges are entered into are not presented in the table as they are not financial instruments. |
(4) |
Items on the statement of financial position and some probable forecasted cash flows denominated in foreign currencies are hedged by a portion of foreign exchange derivatives not designated in a hedge relationship and
carried at fair value through profit and loss. |
|
|
|
206 |
|
NOKIA ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 20-F 2016 |
The methodology for assessing market risk exposures: Value-at-risk
The Group uses the Value-at-Risk (VaR) methodology to assess exposures to foreign exchange risks. The VaR-based methodology provides estimates of potential
fair value losses in market risk-sensitive instruments as a result of adverse changes in specified market factors, at a specified confidence level over a defined holding period. The Group calculates the foreign exchange VaR using the Monte Carlo
method which simulates random values for exchange rates in which the Group has exposures and takes the non-linear price function of certain derivative instruments into account. The VaR is determined using volatilities and correlations of rates and
prices estimated from a sample of historical market data, at a 95% confidence level, using a one-month holding period. To put more weight on recent market conditions, an exponentially weighted moving average is performed on the data with an
appropriate decay factor. This model implies that within a one-month period, the potential loss will not exceed the VaR estimate in 95% of possible outcomes. In the remaining 5% of possible outcomes the potential loss will be at minimum equal
to the VaR figure and, on average, substantially higher. The VaR methodology relies on a number of assumptions which include the following: risks are measured under average market conditions, changes in market risk factors follow normal
distributions, future movements in market risk factors are in line with estimated parameters and the assessed exposures do not change during the holding period. Thus, it is possible that, for any given month, the potential losses at a 95% confidence
level are different and could be substantially higher than the estimated VaR.
The VaR figures for the Groups financial instruments which are sensitive to
foreign exchange risks are presented in the table below. The VaR calculation includes foreign currency denominated monetary financial instruments, such as available-for-sale investments, loans and accounts receivable, investments at fair value
through profit and loss, cash, loans and accounts payable; foreign exchange derivatives carried at fair value through profit and loss which are not in a hedge relationship and are mostly used to hedge the statement of financial position foreign
exchange exposure; and foreign exchange derivatives designated as forecasted cash flow hedges and net investment hedges. Most of the VaR is caused by these derivatives as forecasted cash flow and net investment exposures are not financial
instruments as defined in IFRS 7, Financial Instruments: Disclosures, and thus not included in the VaR calculation.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2016 |
|
|
|
|
|
2015 |
|
EURm |
|
VaR from financial instruments |
|
As of December 31 |
|
|
83 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
54 |
|
Average for the year |
|
|
111 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
145 |
|
Range for the year |
|
|
73149 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
54217 |
|
Interest rate risk
The Group is exposed to interest rate risk either through market value fluctuations of items on the consolidated statement of financial position (price
risk) or through changes in interest income or expenses (refinancing or reinvestment risk). Interest rate risk mainly arises through interest-bearing liabilities and assets. Estimated future changes in cash flows and
the structure of the consolidated statement of financial position also expose the Group to interest rate risk. The objective of interest rate risk management is to mitigate adverse impacts arising from interest rate fluctuations on the consolidated
income statement, cash flow, and financial assets and liabilities while taking into consideration the Groups target capital structure and the resulting net interest rate exposure.
Interest rate profile of interest-bearing assets and liabilities as of December 31:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2016 |
|
|
|
|
|
2015 |
|
EURm |
|
|
Fixed rate |
|
|
|
Floating rate |
(1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed rate |
|
|
|
Floating rate |
(1) |
Assets |
|
|
2 107 |
|
|
|
7 410 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 453 |
|
|
|
6 428 |
|
Liabilities |
|
|
(3 845 |
) |
|
|
(113 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2 038 |
) |
|
|
(31 |
) |
Assets and liabilities before
derivatives |
|
|
(1 738 |
) |
|
|
7 297 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 415 |
|
|
|
6 397 |
|
Interest rate derivatives |
|
|
1 358 |
|
|
|
(1 328 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
981 |
|
|
|
(986 |
) |
Assets and liabilities after
derivatives |
|
|
(380 |
) |
|
|
5 969 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 396 |
|
|
|
5 411 |
|
(1) |
All investments and credit support-related liabilities with initial maturity of three months or less are considered floating rate for the purposes of interest rate risk management. Comparatives have been adjusted to
conform to current year presentation. |
|
|
|
NOKIA ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 20-F 2016 |
|
207 |
Notes to consolidated financial statements continued
Interest rate exposure is monitored and managed centrally. The Group uses selective sensitivity analyses to assess and measure interest rate exposure arising from
interest-bearing assets, interest-bearing liabilities and related derivatives. Sensitivity analysis determines an estimate of potential fair value changes in market risk-sensitive instruments by varying interest rates in currencies in which the
Group has material amounts of financial assets and liabilities while keeping all other variables constant. The Groups sensitivity to interest rate exposure in the investment and debt portfolios is presented in the table below. Sensitivities to
credit spreads are not reflected in the numbers.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2016 |
|
|
|
|
|
2015 |
|
EURm |
|
Impact on fair value |
|
|
Impact on profit |
|
|
Impact on OCI |
|
|
|
|
|
Impact on fair value |
|
|
Impact on profit |
|
|
Impact on OCI |
|
Interest rates increase by 100 basis points |
|
|
181 |
|
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
(8 |
) |
|
|
(32 |
) |
Interest rates decrease by 50 basis points |
|
|
(99 |
) |
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
17 |
|
Equity price risk
In 2016, the Group does not have exposure to equity price risk as it does not have significant investments in publicly listed equity shares (EUR 16 million in
2015). The private funds where the Group has investments may, from time to time, have investments in public equity. Such investments have not been included in the above number.
Other market risk
In certain emerging market
countries there are local exchange control regulations that provide for restrictions on making cross-border transfers of funds as well as other regulations that impact the Groups ability to control its net assets in those countries.
Credit risk
Credit risk refers to the risk that a counterparty will default
on its contractual obligations resulting in financial loss to the Group. Credit risk arises from credit exposures to customers, including outstanding receivables, financial guarantees and committed transactions, as well as financial institutions,
including bank and cash, fixed income and money-market investments, and derivative financial instruments. Credit risk is managed separately for business-related and financial credit exposures.
The maximum exposure to credit risk for outstanding customer finance loans is limited to the book value of financial assets as included in the consolidated statement of
financial position:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EURm |
|
2016 |
|
|
2015 |
|
Financial guarantees given on behalf of customers and other third parties |
|
|
|
|
|
|
6 |
|
Loan commitments given but not used |
|
|
223 |
|
|
|
180 |
|
Outstanding customer finance loans(1) |
|
|
129 |
|
|
|
33 |
|
Total |
|
|
352 |
|
|
|
219 |
|
(1) |
Includes acquired customer loans on a fair value basis which excludes EUR 33 million considered to be uncollectible. |
Business-related credit risk
The Group aims to
ensure the highest possible quality in accounts receivable and loans due from customers and other third parties. The Credit Policy, approved by the Group President and CEO, and the related procedures approved by the Group CFO, lay out the
framework for the management of the business-related credit risks. The Credit Policy and related procedures set out that credit decisions are based on credit evaluation in each business, including credit rating for larger exposures, according
to defined rating principles. Material credit exposures require Group-level approval. Credit risks are monitored in each business and, where appropriate, mitigated with the use of letters of credit, collateral, insurance, and the sale of selected
receivables.
Credit exposure is measured as the total of accounts receivable and loans outstanding due from customers and committed credits. Accounts receivable do
not include any major concentrations of credit risk by customer. The top three customers account for approximately 3.5%, 3.0% and 2.4% (9.6%, 5.9% and 3.5% in 2015) of accounts receivable and loans due from customers and other third parties as
of December 31, 2016. The top three credit exposures by country account for approximately 19.1%, 8.6% and 7.4% (19.6%, 12.1% and 10.8% in 2015) of the Groups accounts receivable and loans due from customers and other third parties as
of December 31, 2016. The 19.1% credit exposure relates to accounts receivable in China (19.6% in 2015).
The Group has provided allowances for doubtful
accounts on accounts receivable and loans due from customers and other third parties not past due based on an analysis of debtors credit ratings and credit histories. The Group establishes allowances for doubtful accounts that represent an
estimate of expected losses at the end of the reporting period. All receivables and loans due from customers are considered on an individual basis to determine the allowances for doubtful accounts. The total of accounts receivable and
loans due from customers is EUR 7 101 million (EUR 3 946 million in 2015). The gross carrying amount of accounts receivable, related to customer balances for which valuation allowances have been recognized, is EUR 2
439 million (EUR 1 150 million in 2015). The allowances for doubtful accounts for these accounts receivable as well as amounts expected to be uncollectible for acquired receivables are EUR 301 million (EUR 62 million in 2015).
|
|
|
208 |
|
NOKIA ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 20-F 2016 |
Aging of past due receivables not considered to be impaired as of December 31:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EURm |
|
2016 |
|
|
2015 |
|
Past due 1-30 days |
|
|
102 |
|
|
|
25 |
|
Past due 31-180 days |
|
|
141 |
|
|
|
53 |
|
More than 180 days |
|
|
223 |
|
|
|
124 |
|
Total |
|
|
466 |
|
|
|
202 |
|
Financial credit risk
Financial instruments contain an element of risk resulting from changes in the market price due to counterparties becoming less creditworthy or risk of loss due to
counterparties being unable to meet their obligations. Financial credit risk is measured and monitored centrally by Treasury. Financial credit risk is managed actively by limiting counterparties to a sufficient number of major banks and financial
institutions, and by monitoring the creditworthiness and the size of exposures continuously. Additionally, the Group enters into netting arrangements with all major counterparties, which give the right to offset in the event that the counterparty
would not be able to fulfill its obligations. The Group enters into collateral agreements with certain counterparties, which require counterparties to post collateral against derivative receivables.
Investment decisions are based on strict creditworthiness and maturity criteria as defined in the Treasury-related policies and procedures. As a result of
this investment policy approach and active management of outstanding investment exposures, the Group has not been subject to any material credit losses in its financial investments in the years presented.
Breakdown of outstanding fixed income and money-market investments by sector and credit rating grades ranked as per Moodys rating categories as of
December 31:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EURm |
|
|
Rating(1) |
|
|
|
Due within 3 months |
|
|
|
Due between 3 and 12 months |
|
|
|
Due between 1 and 3 years |
|
|
|
Due between 3 and 5 years |
|
|
|
Due beyond 5 years |
|
|
|
Total(2)(3)(4) |
|
2016 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Banks |
|
|
Aaa |
|
|
|
1 054 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 054 |
|
|
|
|
Aa1-Aa3 |
|
|
|
410 |
|
|
|
201 |
|
|
|
35 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
646 |
|
|
|
|
A1-A3 |
|
|
|
1 405 |
|
|
|
211 |
|
|
|
387 |
|
|
|
116 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 119 |
|
|
|
|
Baa1-Baa3 |
|
|
|
893 |
|
|
|
728 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 621 |
|
|
|
|
Ba1-Ba3 |
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
|
Non-rated |
|
|
|
42 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
42 |
|
Governments |
|
|
A1-A3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
274 |
|
|
|
53 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
327 |
|
Other |
|
|
Aa1-Aa3 |
|
|
|
45 |
|
|
|
30 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
76 |
|
|
|
|
A1-A3 |
|
|
|
52 |
|
|
|
61 |
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
126 |
|
|
|
|
Baa1-Baa3 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24 |
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 922 |
|
|
|
1 244 |
|
|
|
715 |
|
|
|
169 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6 050 |
|
2015 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Banks |
|
|
Aaa |
|
|
|
3 269 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 269 |
|
|
|
|
Aa1-Aa3 |
|
|
|
93 |
|
|
|
94 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
187 |
|
|
|
|
A1-A3 |
|
|
|
280 |
|
|
|
320 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
700 |
|
|
|
|
Baa1-Baa3 |
|
|
|
738 |
|
|
|
475 |
|
|
|
90 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
50 |
|
|
|
1 353 |
|
|
|
|
Non-rated |
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12 |
|
Governments |
|
|
Aaa |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
267 |
|
|
|
252 |
|
|
|
444 |
|
|
|
113 |
|
|
|
1 076 |
|
|
|
|
Aa1-Aa3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
140 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
150 |
|
|
|
|
A1-A3 |
|
|
|
309 |
|
|
|
198 |
|
|
|
257 |
|
|
|
50 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
814 |
|
|
|
|
Baa1-Baa3 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
35 |
|
Other |
|
|
Baa1-Baa3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12 |
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4 713 |
|
|
|
1 354 |
|
|
|
632 |
|
|
|
746 |
|
|
|
163 |
|
|
|
7 608 |
|
(1) |
Bank Parent Company ratings are used here for bank groups. In some emerging markets countries, actual bank subsidiary ratings may differ from the Parent Company rating. |
(2) |
Fixed income and money-market investments include term deposits, structured deposits, investments in liquidity funds and investments in fixed income instruments classified as available-for-sale investments and
investments at fair value through profit and loss. Liquidity funds invested solely in government securities are included under Governments. Other liquidity funds are included under Banks. |
(3) |
Instruments that include a call feature have been presented at their final maturities, if any. Instruments that are contractually due beyond 3 months include EUR 566 million (EUR 510 million in 2015)
of instruments that have a call period of less than 3 months. |
(4) |
Includes EUR 5 million of restricted investments (EUR 5 million in 2015) within fixed income and money-market investments. These are restricted financial assets under various contractual or
legal obligations. |
97% (98% in 2015) of the Groups cash at bank of EUR 3 276 million (EUR 2 242 million in 2015) is held with
banks of investment grade credit rating.
|
|
|
NOKIA ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 20-F 2016 |
|
209 |
Notes to consolidated financial statements continued
Financial assets and liabilities subject to offsetting under enforceable master netting agreements and similar arrangements as of December 31:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross amounts of
financial assets/ (liabilities) |
|
|
Gross amounts of financial liabilities/
(assets) set off in the statement of financial position |
|
|
Net amounts of financial assets/
(liabilities) presented in the statement of financial position |
|
|
Related amounts not set off in
the statement of financial position |
|
|
|
|
EURm |
|
|
|
|
Financial instruments
assets/(liabilities) |
|
|
Cash collateral
received/(pledged) |
|
|
Net amount |
|
2016 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivative assets |
|
|
235 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
235 |
|
|
|
153 |
|
|
|
73 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
Derivative liabilities |
|
|
(236 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(236 |
) |
|
|
(128 |
) |
|
|
(96 |
) |
|
|
(12 |
) |
Total |
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
25 |
|
|
|
(23 |
) |
|
|
(3 |
) |
2015 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivative assets |
|
|
96 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
96 |
|
|
|
67 |
|
|
|
24 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
Derivative liabilities |
|
|
(114 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(114 |
) |
|
|
(65 |
) |
|
|
(34 |
) |
|
|
(15 |
) |
Total |
|
|
(18 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(18 |
) |
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
(10 |
) |
|
|
(10 |
) |
The financial instruments subject to enforceable master netting agreements and similar arrangements are not offset in the consolidated
statement of financial position where there is no intention to settle net or realize the asset and settle the liability simultaneously.
Liquidity risk
Liquidity risk is defined as financial distress or extraordinarily high financing costs arising from a shortage of liquid funds in a situation where outstanding debt
needs to be refinanced or where business conditions unexpectedly deteriorate and require financing. Transactional liquidity risk is defined as the risk of executing a financial transaction below fair market value or not being able to execute the
transaction at all within a specific period of time. The objective of liquidity risk management is to maintain sufficient liquidity, and to ensure that it is available fast enough without endangering its value in order to avoid uncertainty related
to financial distress at all times.
The Group aims to secure sufficient liquidity at all times through efficient cash management and by investing in short-term
liquid interest-bearing securities and money-market investments. Depending on its overall liquidity position, the Group may pre-finance or refinance upcoming debt maturities before contractual maturity dates. The transactional liquidity risk is
minimized by entering into transactions where proper two-way quotes can be obtained from the market.
Due to the dynamic nature of the underlying business, the
Group aims to maintain flexibility in funding by maintaining committed and uncommitted credit lines. As of December 31, 2016 committed revolving credit facilities totaled EUR 1 579 million (EUR 1 500 million in 2015).
Significant current long-term funding programs as of December 31, 2016:
|
|
|
|
|
Issuer: |
|
Program: |
|
Issued |
Nokia Corporation |
|
Euro Medium-Term Note Program, totaling EUR 5 000 million |
|
|
Significant current
short-term funding programs as of December 31, 2016: |
Issuer: |
|
Program: |
|
Issued |
Nokia Corporation |
|
Local commercial paper program in Finland, totaling EUR 750 million |
|
|
|
|
|
210 |
|
NOKIA ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 20-F 2016 |
The following table presents an undiscounted cash flow analysis for financial liabilities and financial assets that are presented on the consolidated statement of
financial position, and off-balance sheet instruments such as loan commitments, according to their remaining contractual maturity. The line-by-line analysis does not directly reconcile with the consolidated statement of financial
position.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EURm |
|
Total |
|
|
Due within 3 months |
|
|
Due between 3 and 12 months |
|
|
Due between 1 and 3 years |
|
|
Due between 3 and 5 years |
|
|
Due beyond 5 years |
|
2016 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-current financial assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term loans receivable |
|
|
150 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
86 |
|
|
|
32 |
|
|
|
30 |
|
Current financial assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Short-term loans receivable |
|
|
62 |
|
|
|
32 |
|
|
|
28 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investments at fair value through profit and loss |
|
|
326 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
272 |
|
|
|
53 |
|
|
|
|
|
Available-for-sale investments, including cash
equivalents(1) |
|
|
5 753 |
|
|
|
3 935 |
|
|
|
1 248 |
|
|
|
453 |
|
|
|
117 |
|
|
|
|
|
Bank and cash |
|
|
3 276 |
|
|
|
3 276 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows related to derivative financial assets net settled: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivative contractsreceipts |
|
|
42 |
|
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
(6 |
) |
|
|
30 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows related to derivative financial assets gross settled: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivative contractsreceipts |
|
|
8 221 |
|
|
|
6 473 |
|
|
|
492 |
|
|
|
1 038 |
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
205 |
|
Derivative contractspayments |
|
|
(7 942 |
) |
|
|
(6 404 |
) |
|
|
(440 |
) |
|
|
(962 |
) |
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
|
(131 |
) |
Accounts
receivable(2) |
|
|
5 895 |
|
|
|
4 430 |
|
|
|
1 354 |
|
|
|
106 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
Non-current financial liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term interest-bearing liabilities |
|
|
(5 807 |
) |
|
|
(85 |
) |
|
|
(140 |
) |
|
|
(1 955 |
) |
|
|
(269 |
) |
|
|
(3 358 |
) |
Current financial liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Short-term borrowings |
|
|
(372 |
) |
|
|
(255 |
) |
|
|
(116 |
) |
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows related to derivative financial liabilities gross settled: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivative contractsreceipts |
|
|
8 948 |
|
|
|
7 727 |
|
|
|
925 |
|
|
|
248 |
|
|
|
48 |
|
|
|
|
|
Derivative contractspayments |
|
|
(9 187 |
) |
|
|
(7 867 |
) |
|
|
(995 |
) |
|
|
(272 |
) |
|
|
(53 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable |
|
|
(3 781 |
) |
|
|
(3 600 |
) |
|
|
(152 |
) |
|
|
(29 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contingent financial assets and liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loan commitments given undrawn(3) |
|
|
(223 |
) |
|
|
(30 |
) |
|
|
(83 |
) |
|
|
(110 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loan commitments obtained undrawn(4) |
|
|
1 564 |
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
1 568 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
Instruments that include a call feature have been presented at their final maturities, if any. Instruments that are contractually due beyond 3 months include EUR 566 million of instruments that have a call
period of less than 3 months. |
(2) |
Accounts receivable maturity analysis does not include accrued receivables of EUR 1 077 million. |
(3) |
Loan commitments given undrawn have been included in the earliest period in which they could be drawn or called. |
(4) |
Loan commitments obtained undrawn have been included based on the period in which they expire. These amounts include related commitment fees. |
|
|
|
NOKIA ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 20-F 2016 |
|
211 |
Notes to consolidated financial statements continued
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EURm |
|
Total |
|
|
Due within 3 months |
|
|
Due between 3 and 12 months |
|
|
Due between 1 and 3 years |
|
|
Due between 3 and 5 years |
|
|
Due beyond 5 years |
|
2015 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-current financial assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term loans receivable |
|
|
58 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
28 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
18 |
|
Current financial assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Short-term loans receivable |
|
|
22 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investments at fair value through profit and loss |
|
|
742 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
256 |
|
|
|
265 |
|
|
|
57 |
|
|
|
164 |
|
Available-for-sale investments, including cash
equivalents(1) |
|
|
6 938 |
|
|
|
4 714 |
|
|
|
1 105 |
|
|
|
403 |
|
|
|
663 |
|
|
|
53 |
|
Bank and cash |
|
|
2 242 |
|
|
|
2 242 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows related to derivative financial assets net settled: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivative contractsreceipts |
|
|
51 |
|
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
(7 |
) |
|
|
22 |
|
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows related to derivative financial assets gross settled: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivative contractsreceipts |
|
|
4 203 |
|
|
|
3 441 |
|
|
|
221 |
|
|
|
42 |
|
|
|
295 |
|
|
|
204 |
|
Derivative contractspayments |
|
|
(4 078 |
) |
|
|
(3 431 |
) |
|
|
(209 |
) |
|
|
(23 |
) |
|
|
(277 |
) |
|
|
(138 |
) |
Accounts
receivable(2) |
|
|
2 628 |
|
|
|
2 014 |
|
|
|
586 |
|
|
|
25 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
Non-current financial liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term interest-bearing liabilities |
|
|
(3 070 |
) |
|
|
(34 |
) |
|
|
(84 |
) |
|
|
(244 |
) |
|
|
(1 549 |
) |
|
|
(1 159 |
) |
Current financial liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Short-term borrowings |
|
|
(52 |
) |
|
|
(50 |
) |
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows related to derivative financial liabilities net settled: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivative contractspayments |
|
|
(78 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
|
(8 |
) |
|
|
(6 |
) |
|
|
(59 |
) |
Cash flows related to derivative financial liabilities gross settled: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivative contractsreceipts |
|
|
4 901 |
|
|
|
3 114 |
|
|
|
760 |
|
|
|
318 |
|
|
|
709 |
|
|
|
|
|
Derivative contractspayments |
|
|
(4 924 |
) |
|
|
(3 162 |
) |
|
|
(753 |
) |
|
|
(302 |
) |
|
|
(707 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable |
|
|
(1 910 |
) |
|
|
(1 835 |
) |
|
|
(75 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contingent financial assets and liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loan commitments given undrawn(3) |
|
|
(180 |
) |
|
|
(17 |
) |
|
|
(39 |
) |
|
|
(124 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loan commitments obtained undrawn(4) |
|
|
1 487 |
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
1 492 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
Instruments that include a call feature have been presented at their final maturities, if any. Instruments that are contractually due beyond 3 months included EUR 510 million of instruments that have a call period
of less than 3 months in 2015. |
(2) |
Accounts receivable maturity analysis did not include accrued receivables of EUR 1 285 million in 2015. |
(3) |
Loan commitments given undrawn have been included in the earliest period in which they could be drawn or called. |
(4) |
Loan commitments obtained undrawn have been included based on the period in which they expire. These amounts include related commitment fees. |
|
|
|
212 |
|
NOKIA ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 20-F 2016 |
37. Subsequent events
Non-adjusting events after the reporting period
Acquisition of Deepfield Networks Inc.
On
January 31, 2017 the Group acquired 100% ownership interest in Deepfield Networks Inc., a United States-based leader in real-time analytics for IP network performance management and security. The acquisition does not have a material impact to
the consolidated statement of financial position, comprehensive income or cash flows.
Offer to acquire Comptel Corporation
On February 8, 2017 the Group and Comptel Corporation entered into a Transaction Agreement whereby the Group undertakes to make a voluntary
public cash tender offer to purchase all of the issued and outstanding shares and option rights in Comptel Corporation that are not owned by Comptel Corporation, or any of its subsidiaries. The price offered for each share validly tendered in
the Tender Offer will be EUR 3.04 in cash. The Tender Offer values Comptel at approximately EUR 347 million, on a fully diluted basis.
Offer to purchase outstanding notes
On February 22, 2017 the Group announced that it commenced an offer to purchase the
outstanding EUR 500 million 6.75% notes due February 4, 2019 (the 2019 Euro Notes) issued by Nokia Corporation; and the outstanding USD 300 million 6.50% notes due January 15, 2028 (the 2028 Dollar Notes)
and USD 1 360 million 6.45% notes due March 15, 2029 (the 2029 Dollar Notes), issued by Lucent Technologies Inc. (the predecessor to Alcatel-Lucent Inc., the Groups wholly-owned subsidiary), up to a maximum cash
consideration of USD 1 000 million (the Tender Offer). The purpose of the Tender Offer is to manage the overall indebtedness of the Group. Following the settlement of the Tender Offer, the Group expects to cancel any
euro-denominated notes purchased pursuant to the Tender Offer and to hold any US dollar-denominated notes purchased pursuant to the Tender Offer.
On March 21,
2017, the Tender Offer expired. The Group received tenders for 53.76% (EUR 268.8 million) of the 2019 Euro Notes, 28.66% (USD 86.0 million) of the 2028 Dollar Notes and 29.48% (USD 400.9 million) of the 2029 Dollar Notes. The Group expects to settle
the Tender Offer on March 23, 2017.
New euro-denominated notes
On March 15, 2017, the Group issued EUR 500 million 1.00% Senior Notes due 2021 and EUR 750 million 2.00% Senior Notes due 2024 under our 5 000 000 000
Euro Medium-Term Note Programme. The proceeds of the new notes are intended to fund the Tender Offer and for general corporate purposes.
Income taxes
In January 2017, as part of
continuing changes to its operating model, the Group transferred certain intellectual property between its operations in Finland and the United States, which is expected to result in approximately EUR 250 million negative non-recurring impact
on tax expenses in the first quarter of 2017 but no material cash tax outflow.
Changes in organizational structure
On March 17, 2017, the Group announced changes in the organizational structure, effective from April 1, 2017. The organizational changes include the
separation of the current Mobile Networks business group into two distinct, but closely linked, organizations: (1) Mobile Networks, focused on products and solutions and (2) Global Services, focused on services. The Group will continue to
report financial information for Ultra Broadband Networks, IP Networks and Applications and Nokia Technologies. Ultra Broadband Networks will be composed of the Mobile Networks, Global Services and Fixed Networks business groups. IP Networks
and Applications is composed of the IP/Optical Networks and Applications & Analytics business groups.
|
|
|
NOKIA ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 20-F 2016 |
|
213 |
Report of independent registered
public accounting firm
To the Board of Directors and shareholders of Nokia Corporation
In our opinion, the accompanying consolidated statement of financial position and the related consolidated income statement, consolidated statement of
comprehensive income, consolidated statement of changes in shareholders equity and consolidated statement of cash flows present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Nokia Corporation and its subsidiaries at
December 31, 2016 and 2015, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2016 in conformity with International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) as issued by
the International Accounting Standards Board (IASB) and in conformity with IFRS as adopted by the European Union. Also in our opinion, the company maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of
December 31, 2016, based on criteria established in Internal Control Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). The companys management is
responsible for these financial statements, for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in the accompanying
Managements annual report on internal control over financial reporting appearing under Section Controls and procedures. Our responsibility is to express opinions on these financial statements and on the companys
internal control over financial reporting based on our integrated audits. We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and
perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement and whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audits of
the financial statements included examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, and evaluating the
overall financial statement presentation. Our audit of internal control over financial reporting included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, and testing and
evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk. Our audits also included performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audits provide
a reasonable basis for our opinions.
A companys internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance
regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A companys internal control over financial reporting includes
those policies and procedures that (i) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (ii) provide reasonable assurance that
transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance
with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (iii) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the companys assets
that could have a material effect on the financial statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or
detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies
or procedures may deteriorate.
As described in Managements Annual Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting appearing under
Section Controls and procedures, management has excluded Alcatel Lucent SA and its subsidiaries from its assessment of internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2016 because it was acquired by the company in a
purchase business combination during 2016. We have also excluded Alcatel Lucent SA and its subsidiaries from our audit of internal control over financial reporting. Alcatel Lucent SA is a wholly owned subsidiary whose total consolidated assets and
net sales represent 42% and 51%, respectively, of the related consolidated financial statement amounts as of and for the year ended December 31, 2016.
/s/
PricewaterhouseCoopers Oy
Helsinki, Finland
March 23, 2017
|
|
|
214 |
|
NOKIA ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 20-F 2016 |
Other information
|
|
|
NOKIA ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 20-F 2016 |
|
215 |
Exhibits
|
|
|
1 |
|
Articles of Association of Nokia Corporation. |
|
|
4(1) |
|
Memorandum of Understanding by and between Nokia Corporation and Alcatel Lucent dated as of April 15, 2015. |
|
|
6 |
|
Refer to Note 13, Earnings per share, of our consolidated financial statements included in this annual report on Form 20-F, for information on how earnings per share information
was calculated. |
|
|
8 |
|
Refer to Note 32, Principal Group companies, of our consolidated financial statements included in this annual report on Form 20-F, for more information on our significant
subsidiaries. |
|
|
12.1 |
|
Certification of Rajeev Suri, President and Chief Executive Officer of Nokia Corporation, Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
12.2 |
|
Certification of Kristian Pullola, Group Chief Financial Officer of Nokia Corporation, pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
13 |
|
Certification, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
15(a) |
|
Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm. |
(1) |
Incorporated by reference to Annex A of our registration statement filed on Form F-4 with the Securities and Exchange Commission on August 14, 2015. |
|
|
|
216 |
|
NOKIA ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 20-F 2016 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Glossary of terms
|
|
|
3G (Third Generation Mobile Communications): The third generation of mobile communications standards designed for
carrying both voice and data generally using WCDMA or close variants.
4G (Fourth Generation Mobile Communications): The fourth generation of mobile
communications standards based on LTE, offering IP data connections only and providing true broadband internet access for mobile devices. Refer also to LTE.
4.5G Pro: Our next step in a technology path that will optimize the journey to 5G. Powered by the 5G-ready AirScale, 4.5G Pro delivers ten times the speeds
of initial 4G networks, enabling operators to offer gigabit peak data rates to meet growing demands from the programmable world. Using extended carrier aggregation techniques across up to five frequency bands, operators will be able to leverage
their diverse paired (FDD) and unpaired (TDD) licensed spectrum as well as unlicensed spectrum.
4.9G: Our evolutionary step to enable future service
continuity with 5G network fabric. Expected by the end of 2017, 4.9G will provide significant increases in capacity and several gigabits of speed-per-second on the path to 5G. This will include allowing additional numbers of carriers to be
aggregated, opening the door to additional licensed and unlicensed spectrum, and advancing the radio systems to allow highly directional antennas to be used and to allow signals sent via multiple transmit/receive paths to be added together.
5G (Fifth Generation Mobile Communications): The next major phase of mobile telecommunications standards. 5G will be the set of technical
components and systems needed to handle new requirements and overcome the limits of current systems.
Access network: A telecommunications network
between a local exchange and the subscriber station.
ADSL (Asymmetric Digital Subscriber Line): A data communications technology that enables faster data
transmission over copper telephone lines than a conventional modem can provide; the technology that introduced broadband to the masses.
Airframe: Our
5G-ready, end-to-end data center solution that combines the benefits of Cloud computing technologies with the requirements of the core and radio telecommunications world. It is available in Rackmount and Open Compute Project (OCP) form factors. This
enables the solution to be very scalable: from small distributed latency-optimized data centers, all the way to massive centralized hyper scale data center deployment.
AirScale Radio Access: A 5G-ready complete radio access generation that helps operators address the increasing demands of today and tomorrow. The solution
comprises: Nokia AirScale Base Station with multiband RF elements and system modules; Nokia AirScale Active Antennas; Cloud RAN with Nokia AirScale Cloud Base Station Server and the Cloud-based AirScale RNC for 3G; Nokia AirScale Wi-Fi; common
software; and services which use intelligent analytics and extreme automation to maximize the performance of hybrid networks.
Alcatel Lucent SA:
Alcatel Lucent, a subsidiary of Nokia Corporation.
API (Application Programming Interface): A set of routines, protocols, and tools for building software
applications, specifying how software components should interact.
Applications & Analytics: Our business group offering carrier-grade software
applications and platforms to provide operations and business support systems, build, deliver, and optimize services, enable their monetization, and to improve customer experience.
Bandwidth: The width of a communication channel, which affects transmission speeds over that channel.
Base station: A network element in a mobile network responsible for radio transmission and reception to or
from the mobile station.
Broadband: The delivery of higher bandwidth by using transmission channels capable of supporting data rates greater than the
primary rate of 9.6 Kbps.
CDMA (Code Division Multiple Access): A technique in which radio transmissions using the same frequency band are coded in a way
that a signal from a certain transmitter can be received only by certain receivers.
Churn: Churn rate is a measure of the number of customers or
subscribers who leave their service provider, e.g. a mobile operator, during a given time period.
Cloud: Cloud computing is a model for enabling ubiquitous,
convenient, on-demand network access to a shared pool of configurable computing resources (e.g., networks, servers, storage, applications and services) that can be rapidly provisioned and released with minimal management effort.
CloudBand: Our Cloud management and orchestration solutions enabling a unified Cloud engine and platform for NFV.
Cloud Native Core: Optimizes Cloud core applications and architecture to support massive IoT, mobile broadband and the 5G programmable world.
Continuing operations: Refers to the Continuing operations following the Acquisition of Alcatel Lucent, the Sale of the HERE Business in 2015 and the Sale of the
D&S Business in 2014. Our Continuing operations in 2016 included two businesses: our Networks business and Nokia Technologies.
Converged Core: A
business unit of our Mobile Networks business group providing solutions for the core network of the future.
Convergence: The coming together of two or more
disparate disciplines or technologies. Convergence types are, for example, IP convergence, fixed-mobile convergence and device convergence.
Core
network: A combination of exchanges and the basic transmission equipment that together form the basis for network services.
CSPs: Communication service
providers.
Customer Experience Management: Software suite used to manage and improve the customer experience, based on customer, device and network
insights.
Devices & Services: Our former mobile device business, substantially all of which was sold to Microsoft.
Digital: A signaling technique in which a signal is encoded into digits for transmission.
Discontinued operations: Mainly refers to the divestment of our HERE business to an automotive consortium and the sale of substantially all of our
Devices & Services business to Microsoft.
Ecosystem: An industry term to describe the increasingly large communities of mutually beneficial
partnerships that participants such as hardware manufacturers, software providers, developers, publishers, entertainment providers, advertisers and ecommerce specialists form in order to bring their offerings to market. At the heart of the major
ecosystems in the mobile devices and related services industry is the operating system and the development platform upon which services are built.
Engine: Hardware and software that perform essential core functions for telecommunication or application tasks.
|
|
|
NOKIA ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 20-F 2016 |
|
217 |
Glossary of terms continued
ETSI (European Telecommunications Standards Institute):
Standards produced by the ETSI contain technical specifications laying down the characteristics required for a telecommunications product.
FD-LTE (Frequency Division Long-Term Evolution) also known as FDD (Frequency Division Duplex): A standard for LTE mobile broadband networks. Frequency
Division means that separate, parallel connections are used to carry data from the base station to the mobile device (downlink) and from the mobile device to the base station (uplink).
Fixed Networks: Our Fixed Networks business group provides copper and fiber access products, solutions, and services.
Future X: A network architecturea massively distributed, cognitive, continuously adaptive, learning and optimizing network connecting humans, senses,
things, systems, infrastructure, processes.
G.fast: A fixed broadband technology able to deliver up to 1Gbps over very short distances (for
example, for in-building use, also called Fiber-to-the-Building). Launched in 2014, G.fast uses more frequencies and G.fast Vectoring techniques to achieve higher speeds.
Global Delivery Center: A remote service delivery center with a pool of services experts, automated tools and standardized processes to ensure that services
across the entire network life cycle are delivered to operators globally.
Global Services: A business unit within the Networks business, Global Services
provides mobile operators with a broad range of services, including professional services, network implementation and customer care services.
GPON (Gigabit
Passive Optical Networking): A fiber access technology that delivers 2.5Gbps over a single optical fiber to multiple end points including residential and enterprise sites.
GSM (Global System for Mobile Communications): A digital system for mobile communications that is based on a widely-accepted standard and typically operates in
the 900 MHz, 1800 MHz and 1900 MHz frequency bands.
HERE: A former Nokia company focused on mapping and location intelligence services, which was divested
to an automotive consortium in 2015.
IFRS (International Financial Reporting Standards): International Financial Reporting Standards as issued by the
International Accounting Standards Board and in conformity with IFRS as adopted by the European Union.
Implementation patents: Implementation patents
include technologies used to implement functionalities in products or services which are not covered by commitments to standards-setting organizations, so they typically offer product differentiation by giving competitive advantage, such as
increased performance, smaller size or improved battery life, and the patent owner has no obligation to license them to others.
Internet of Things (IoT):
All things such as cars, the clothes we wear, household appliances and machines in factories connected to the Internet and able to automatically learn and organize themselves.
Industrial design: Design process applied for products that will be manufactured at mass scale.
Internet Protocol: A network layer protocol that offers a connectionless internet work service and forms part of the TCP/IP protocol.
IP (Intellectual Property): Intellectual property results from original creative thought, covering items such as patents, copyright material and trademarks, as
well as business models and plans.
IP Multimedia Subsystem (IMS): Architectural framework designed to deliver IP-based multimedia services on
telecommunications networks; standardized by 3GPP.
IPR (Intellectual Property Right): Legal right protecting the economic exploitation of intellectual
property, a generic term used to describe products of human intellect, for example patents, that have an economic value.
IPR licensing: Generally refers to
an agreement or an arrangement where a company allows another company to use its intellectual property (such as patents, trademarks or copyrights) under certain terms.
IP/Optical Networks: Our IP/Optical Networks business group provides the key IP routing and optical transport systems, software and services to build high
capacity network infrastructure for the internet and global connectivity.
LTE (Long-Term Evolution): 3GPP radio technology evolution architecture and a
standard for wireless communication of high-speed data. Also referred to as 4G, refer to 4G above.
LTE-M: An IoT radio technology addressing demanding IoT
applications needs with low to mid-volume data use of up to about 1Mbps. The technology also simplifies modems by about 80%.
Mobile broadband: Refers
to high-speed wireless internet connections and services designed to be used from arbitrary locations.
Mobile Broadband: A segment within Nokia Networks in
2015. Mobile Broadband provided mobile operators with radio and core network software together with the hardware needed to deliver mobile voice and data services.
Mobile Networks: Our Mobile Networks business group offers an industry-leading portfolio of end-to-end mobile networking solutions comprising hardware, software,
and services for telecommunications operators, enterprises, and related markets/verticals such as public safety and IoT.
Networks business: Comprised the
Mobile Networks, Fixed Networks, Applications & Analytics, and IP/Optical Networks business groups in 2016.
NFC (Near Field Communication):
A short-range wireless technology that enables people to connect one NFC-enabled device with another, or to read an NFC tag. By bringing one NFC-enabled mobile device close to another NFC device, or to an NFC tag, people can easily
share content, access information and services, or pay for goods.
NFV (Network Functions Virtualization): Principle of separating network functions
from the hardware they run on by using virtual hardware abstraction.
Nokia Bell Labs: Our research arm discovering and developing the technological shifts
needed for the next phase of human existence as well as exploring and solving complex problems to radically redefine networks.
Nokia Networks: Our
former business focused on mobile network infrastructure software, hardware and services.
Nokia Technologies: Our business focused on advanced technology
development and licensing.
NSN (Nokia Solutions and Networks): The former name of our Networks business. From 2007, NSN was known as Nokia Siemens Networks
until we acquired Siemens 50% stake in the joint venture in 2013.
Nuage Networks: A wholly owned subsidiary of Alcatel Lucent, delivers a SDN
solution to eliminate key data center network constraints that hinder Cloud services adoption.
|
|
|
218 |
|
NOKIA ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 20-F 2016 |
Operating system (OS): Software that controls the basic operation of a computer or a mobile device, such as
managing the processor and memory. The term is also often used to refer more generally to the software within a device, including, for instance, the user interface.
OZO: Our professional Virtual Reality camera, crafted by Nokia Technologies.
OZO Live: Software product, running on reference hardware, that enables real-time 3D 360 stitching for VR broadcasting at scale.
Packet: Part of a message transmitted over a packet switched network.
Picocell: A small cellular base station typically covering a small area typically up to 200 meters wide. Typically used to extend coverage to indoor areas
or to add network capacity in areas with very dense phone usage, such as train stations.
Platform: Software platform is a term used to refer to an operating
system or programming environment, or a combination of the two.
PON (Passive Optical Networking): A fiber access architecture in which unpowered Fiber Optic
Splitters are used to enable a single optical fiber to serve multiple end-points without having to provide individual fibers between the hub and customer.
Programmable World: A world where connectivity will expand massively, linking people as well as billions of physical objectsfrom cars, home appliances and
smartphones, to wearables, industrial equipment and health monitors. What distinguishes the Programmable World from the Internet of Things is the intelligence that is added to data to allow people to interpret and use it, rather than just capture
it.
RAN (Radio Access Network): A mobile telecommunications system consisting of radio base stations and transmission equipment.
SDN (Software Defined Networking): An approach to computer networking that decouples the network control and forwarding functions enabling the network control to
become programmable and the underlying hardware to be abstracted.
SEPs (Standard-Essential Patents): Generally, patents needed to produce products
which work on a standard, which companies declare as essential and agree to license on fair, reasonable and non-discriminatory (FRAND) terms.
Service Delivery
Hub: Smaller service delivery centers, typically focused on specific technology or language.
Shared Data Layer (SDL): A highly reliable, scalable and
readily-available data store in the Cloud. Moving subscribers and session data to SDL and using this shared data in an open ecosystem enable rapid innovations of services and faster revenue growth due to better insight into subscriber behavior.
Single RAN: Single RAN allows different radio technologies to be provided at the same time from a single base station, using a multi-purpose platform.
Small cells: Low-powered radio access nodes (micro cells or picocells) that are a vital element in handling very dense data traffic demands. 3G and LTE small
cells use spectrum licensed by the operator; WiFi uses unlicensed spectrum which is therefore not under the operators exclusive control.
SON
(Self-Organizing Network): An automation technology designed to make the planning, configuration, management, optimization and healing of mobile radio access networks simpler and faster.
TD-LTE (Time Division Long-Term Evolution, also known as TDD (Time Division Duplex)): An alternative standard for LTE mobile broadband networks. Time
Division means that a single connection
is used alternately to carry data from the base station to the mobile device (downlink) and then from the mobile device to the base station (uplink).
Technology licensing: Generally refers to an agreement or arrangement where under certain terms a company provides another company with its technology and
possibly know-how, whether protected by intellectual property or not, for use in products or services offered by the other company.
Telco
Cloud: Applying Cloud computing, SDN and NFV principles in telecommunications environment, e.g. separating application software from underlying hardware with automated, programmable interfaces while still retaining telecommunications
requirements such as high availability and low latency.
Transmission: The action of conveying signals from one point to one or more other points.
TWDM-PON (Time Wavelength Division Multiplexing Passive Optical Network): The latest generation fiber access technology, which uses multiple wavelengths
to deliver up to 40Gbps total capacity to homes, businesses, and base stations. Also known as NG-PON2.
TXLEs (Technical extra-large enterprises):
Technically sophisticated companies, such as banks, that invest heavily in their own network infrastructures to gain a key competitive advantage.
VDSL2
(Very High Bit Rate Digital Subscriber Line 2): A fixed broadband technology, the successor of ADSL. Launched in 2007, it typically delivers a 30Mbps broadband service from a street cabinet (also called a Fiber-to-the-Node
deployment) over existing telephone lines.
VDSL2 Vectoring: A fixed broadband technology launched in 2011, able to deliver up to 100Mbps over a VDSL2 line
by applying noise cancellation techniques to remove cross-talk between neighboring VDSL2 lines.
Virtual Reality (VR): The simulation of a three-dimensional
image or environment that can be interacted with in a seemingly real or physical way by a person using special electronic equipment, such as a helmet with a screen inside or gloves fitted with sensors.
VoLTE (Voice over LTE): Required to offer voice services on an all-IP LTE network and generally provided using IP Multimedia Subsystem.
Vplus: A fixed broadband technology, between VDSL2 Vectoring and G.fast in terms of bandwidth and distances, typically used in FTTN (ode) deployments. Launched
in 2015, it delivers up to 300Mbps and has been standardized as VDSL2 35b.
WAN (Wide Area Networking): A geographically distributed private
telecommunications network that interconnects multiple local area networks.
WCDMA (Wideband Code Division Multiple Access): A third-generation mobile
wireless technology that offers high data speeds to mobile and portable wireless devices.
Webscales: Companiessuch as Google, Microsoft, and
Alibabawhich are investing in Cloud technology and network infrastructure on an increasing scale to fulfill their needs for massive, mission-critical networks.
WLAN (Wireless Local Area Network): A local area network using wireless connections, such as radio, microwave or infrared links, in place of physical
cables.
XG-FAST: A Nokia Bell Labs extension of G.fast technology, using even higher frequencies. Capable of delivering over 10Gbps, over 2 bonded
telephone lines, over very short distances.
|
|
|
NOKIA ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 20-F 2016 |
|
219 |
Investor information
Information on the internet
www.nokia.com
Available on the internet: financial reports, members of the Group
Leadership Team, other investor-related materials and events, press releases as well as environmental and social information, including our Sustainability Report, Code of Conduct, Corporate Governance Statement and Remuneration Statement.
Investor Relations contacts
investor.relations@nokia.com
Annual General Meeting
Dividend
The Board proposes to the Annual General Meeting a dividend of EUR 0.17 per share for the year 2016.
Financial reporting
Our interim reports in 2017 are
planned to be published on April 27, 2017, July 27, 2017 and October 26, 2017. The full-year 2017 results are planned to be published in February 2018.
Information published in 2016
All our global press
releases and statements published in 2016 are available on the internet at www.nokia.com/en_int/news/releases.
Stock exchanges
The Nokia Corporation share is quoted on the following stock exchanges:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Symbol |
|
Trading currency |
Nasdaq Helsinki (since 1915) |
|
NOKIA |
|
EUR |
New York Stock Exchange (since 1994) |
|
NOK |
|
USD |
Euronext Paris (since 2015) |
|
NOKIA |
|
EUR |
Documents on display
The documents referred to in this annual report on Form 20-F can be read at the Securities and Exchange Commissions public reference facilities at 100 F Street,
N.E., Room 1580, Washington, D.C. 20549.
|
|
|
220 |
|
NOKIA ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 20-F 2016 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contact information
|
|
|
Nokia Head Office
Karaportti 3
FI-02610 Espoo, Finland
FINLAND
Tel. +358 (0) 10 44 88 000
Fax +358 (0) 10 44 81 002
|
|
|
NOKIA ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 20-F 2016 |
|
221 |
Signatures
The registrant hereby certifies that it meets all of the requirements for filing on Form 20-F and that it has duly
caused and authorized the undersigned to sign this annual report on Form 20-F on its behalf.
Nokia Corporation
|
|
|
By: |
|
/S/ TARJA SIPILÄ |
Name: |
|
Tarja Sipilä |
Title: |
|
Vice President, Corporate Controller |
|
|
|
|
|
|
By: |
|
/S/ RIIKKA TIEAHO |
Name: |
|
Riikka Tieaho |
Title: |
|
Vice President, Corporate Legal |
March 23, 2017
|
|
|
222 |
|
NOKIA ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 20-F 2016 |
|
|
|
|
|
This report is printed on material derived from sustainable sources, and printed using vegetable based inks. Both the manufacturing paper mill and
printer are registered to the Environmental Management System ISO 14001 and are Forest Stewardship Council® (FSC) chain-of-custody certified. CPI Colour is also a Carbon Neutral
Printing Company and reduces its CO2 omissions to net zero in accordance with The CarbonNeutral Protocol. This carbon offsetting supports the Uchindile Mapanda reforestation programme
in Tanzania, an environmental project to establish commercial forests at two locations in Africa.
This report is recyclable and bio-degradable. If you have finished with this document and no longer wish to retain it, please pass it on to other interested readers
or dispose of it in your recycled paper waste. Thank you. |
|
|
|
|
Copyright © 2017 Nokia Corporation. All rights
reserved.
Nokia is a registered trademark of Nokia Corporation.
www.nokia.com