Form 20-F
As filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
September 30, 2005
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
Form 20-F
|
|
|
(Mark One)
|
|
|
o
|
|
REGISTRATION STATEMENT PURSUANT TO SECTION 12(b) OR (g)
OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
OR |
þ |
|
ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the fiscal year ended March 31, 2005
OR |
o |
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
OR |
o |
|
SHELL COMPANY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF
THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
Date of event requiring this shell company
report
If this is an annual report, indicate by check mark whether the
registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of
the Exchange
Act). Yes o No o |
For the transition period
from to
Commission File Number 333-12430
M (2003) plc
Formerly Marconi plc
(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)
ENGLAND AND WALES
(Jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)
8 Salisbury Square
London EC4Y 8BB
United Kingdom
(Address of principal executive office)
Securities registered or to be registered pursuant to
Section 12(b) of the Act:
None
Securities registered or to be registered pursuant to
Section 12(g) of the Act:
American Depositary Shares evidenced by American Depositary
Receipts, each American Depositary Share representing 2 ordinary
shares, nominal value 5 pence per share
Securities for which there is a reporting obligation pursuant to
Section 15(d) of the Act:
None
Indicate
the number of outstanding shares of each of the issuers
classes of capital or common stock as of March 31, 2005:
2,793,011,951 Ordinary Shares of 5p each
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all
reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding
12 months (or such shorter period that the registrant was
required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to
such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
YES þ NO o
Indicate
by check mark which financial statement item the registrant has
elected to follow.
ITEM 17 o ITEM
18 þ
(APPLICABLE ONLY TO ISSUERS INVOLVED IN BANKRUPTCY PROCEEDINGS
DURING THE PAST FIVE YEARS)
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant has filed all documents and
reports required to be filed by Sections 12, 13 or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 subsequent to the
distribution of securities under a plan confirmed by a court.
YES þ NO o
TABLE OF CONTENTS
|
|
|
|
* |
We have responded to Item 18 in lieu of responding to this
Item. |
i
PRESENTATION OF FINANCIAL AND OTHER INFORMATION
On May 19, 2003, M (2003) plc (then known as Marconi
plc) and Marconi Corporation plc concluded the financial
restructuring of the Marconi group. The financial restructuring
was effected through separate schemes of arrangement under the
U.K. Companies Act 1985 for each of M (2003) plc and
Marconi Corporation plc. As a result of the restructuring, the
shares that M (2003) plc held in Marconi Corporation
plc were cancelled. Marconi Corporation plc became the new
parent holding company of the Marconi group and
M (2003) plc ceased to be a member of the Marconi
group. On October 21, 2003, Marconi plc changed its name to
M (2003) plc. M (2003) plc no longer
conducts any business and does not intend to revive any business
operations. In this annual report, the terms we,
us, our, Marconi, the
company refer to M (2003) plc and, prior to
May 19, 2003, its subsidiaries and joint ventures, as the
context requires.
Under the terms of the M (2003) plc scheme of
arrangement, all of our assets, other than those necessary to
fund the administration of the scheme and the company will be
distributed to scheme creditors in accordance with the scheme of
arrangement. The Directors expect to dissolve
M (2003) plc at approximately the same time as the
completion of these distributions to scheme creditors. While
M (2003) plc shares, and ADRs representing
M (2003) plc shares, remain outstanding following the
effectiveness of the financial restructuring, the Directors
believe that there will be no circumstances under which any
additional value will be returned to shareholders of
M (2003) plc. As that is the case, the Directors
believe M (2003) plc shares and ADRs are worthless.
M (2003) plc is incorporated as a public limited
company under the laws of England and Wales. We state our
financial statements in United Kingdom (U.K.) pounds sterling.
In this annual report, references to pounds sterling, pounds or
£ and to pence or p are to the currency of the United
Kingdom, references to euro or
are to the
common legal currency of the members of the European monetary
union, and references to United States (U.S.) dollars, U.S.$ or
$ are to the currency of the United States of America.
Our fiscal year ends on March 31. Unless otherwise
specified, all references in this annual report to our fiscal
year refer to a twelve-month financial period ending
March 31. For example, fiscal 2005 represents the fiscal
year beginning on April 1, 2004 and ending on
March 31, 2005.
The consolidated financial statements contained in this annual
report have been prepared in accordance with accounting
principles generally accepted in the United States, known as
U.S. GAAP.
Various amounts and percentages set forth in this annual report
may have been rounded and, accordingly, may not total.
1
PART I
Item 1: Identity of Directors, Senior Management
and Advisers
This item is not applicable.
Item 2: Offer Statistics and Expected
Timetable
This item is not applicable.
Item 3: Key Information
SELECTED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL DATA
The selected historical consolidated financial information
presented below as at and for each of the five years ended
March 31, 2001 through 2005, has been derived from our
audited consolidated financial statements prepared in accordance
with U.S. GAAP.
On May 19, 2003, we and Marconi Corporation plc concluded
the financial restructuring of the Marconi group through two
separate schemes of arrangement under the U.K.
Companies Act 1985. As a result of the restructuring, Marconi
Corporation plc became the new parent holding company of the
Marconi group, replacing us, and we ceased to be a member of the
Marconi group. Additional details on the restructuring are
included elsewhere in this document.
2
SELECTED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL DATA
(continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2002 | |
|
2001 | |
|
|
£000 | |
|
£000 | |
|
£000 | |
|
£000 | |
|
£000 | |
|
|
| |
STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS DATA:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Network Equipment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100,000 |
|
|
|
1,131,000 |
|
|
|
1,812,000 |
|
|
|
3,268,000 |
|
|
Network Services
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
68,000 |
|
|
|
743,000 |
|
|
|
969,000 |
|
|
|
1,016,000 |
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22,000 |
|
|
|
465,000 |
|
|
|
637,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
168,000 |
|
|
|
1,896,000 |
|
|
|
3,246,000 |
|
|
|
4,921,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating
loss(1)
|
|
|
(1,284 |
) |
|
|
(58,000 |
) |
|
|
(608 |
) |
|
|
(6,392 |
) |
|
|
(52 |
) |
Other income/(expense),
net(2)
|
|
|
361 |
|
|
|
2,335,000 |
|
|
|
(295 |
) |
|
|
23 |
|
|
|
310 |
|
Income/(loss) from continuing operations before income taxes,
minority interest and cumulative effect of changes in accounting
principles
|
|
|
(923 |
) |
|
|
2,277,000 |
|
|
|
(903 |
) |
|
|
(6,369 |
) |
|
|
258 |
|
Income/(loss) from continuing operations before cumulative
effects of changes in accounting principles
|
|
|
(1,108 |
) |
|
|
2,276,000 |
|
|
|
(756 |
) |
|
|
(6,094 |
) |
|
|
101 |
|
Cumulative effects of changes in accounting
principles(3)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(240 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Net income/(loss)
|
|
|
(1,108 |
) |
|
|
2,276,000 |
|
|
|
(807 |
) |
|
|
(6,150 |
) |
|
|
180 |
|
Cash dividends declared per common share
(4)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
£ per share
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
£0.05 |
|
|
$ equivalent per share
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$0.08 |
|
BALANCE SHEET DATA:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
|
8,266 |
|
|
|
8,961 |
|
|
|
3,111 |
|
|
|
4,925 |
|
|
|
11,683 |
|
Net assets/(liabilities)
|
|
|
8,266 |
|
|
|
8,961 |
|
|
|
(2,500 |
) |
|
|
(1,493 |
) |
|
|
4,805 |
|
Capital stock
|
|
|
799,000 |
|
|
|
799,000 |
|
|
|
1,220 |
|
|
|
1,203 |
|
|
|
946 |
|
Shares issued and outstanding (millions)
|
|
|
2,793,011 |
|
|
|
2,793,011 |
|
|
|
2,793,011 |
|
|
|
2,793,011 |
|
|
|
2,785,000 |
|
Notes:
|
|
|
|
(1) |
For fiscal 2002, operating loss is reflected after business
restructuring and asset impairment charges of
£5,319 million. |
|
|
(2) |
For fiscal 2004, other income/(expense), net includes a gain on
financial restructuring of £2,183 million and a gain
on settlement of equity forward contracts of
£123 million. For fiscal 2002, other income/expense,
net includes a gain on early retirement of debt of
£166 million. This reclassification has been made on
adoption of SFAS 145, Recission of FASB Statements
No. 4, 44, and 64, Amendment of FASB Statement No. 13,
and Technical Corrections. |
|
|
(3) |
We adopted EITF 00-19, Accounting for Derivative
Instruments Indexed to, and Potentially Settled in, the
Companys Own Stock, in fiscal 2002. The value of such
instruments, as of the implementation date, was recorded as a
cumulative effect of a change in accounting principles of
£240 million in fiscal 2002. |
|
|
(4) |
Dividend payments were made out of net income, which included
income from discontinued operations. |
3
EXCHANGE RATE INFORMATION
The Noon Buying Rate for pounds sterling expressed in
U.S. dollars per pounds sterling on September 27, 2005
was £1.00 = U.S.$1.7677.
The following table sets forth the high and low noon buying rate
for pounds sterling expressed in U.S. dollars per pound
sterling for each of the previous six months:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005 |
|
High | |
|
Low | |
|
|
| |
April
|
|
|
1.9197 |
|
|
|
1.8733 |
|
May
|
|
|
1.9048 |
|
|
|
1.8205 |
|
June
|
|
|
1.8368 |
|
|
|
1.7930 |
|
July
|
|
|
1.7753 |
|
|
|
1.7303 |
|
August
|
|
|
1.8148 |
|
|
|
1.7695 |
|
September (through 27)
|
|
|
1.8420 |
|
|
|
1.7677 |
|
The following table sets forth the average noon buying rate for
pounds sterling expressed in U.S. dollars per pound
sterling for each of the five most recent fiscal years, based on
the noon buying rate on the last business day of each month.
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Year Ended March 31, |
|
Average | |
|
|
| |
2001
|
|
|
1.4737 |
|
2002
|
|
|
1.4320 |
|
2003
|
|
|
1.5541 |
|
2004
|
|
|
1.8400 |
|
2005
|
|
|
1.8506 |
|
RISK FACTORS
As a result of our financial restructuring, we have ceased
business operations and intend to distribute our remaining
assets to our creditors.
On May 19, 2003, the financial restructuring of the Marconi
group was concluded. The financial restructuring was effected
through separate schemes of arrangement under the U.K. Companies
Act 1985 for each of M (2003) plc and Marconi
Corporation plc. As a result of the restructuring, the shares
that M (2003) plc held in Marconi Corporation plc were
cancelled. Marconi Corporation plc became the new parent holding
company of the Marconi group and we ceased to be a member of the
Marconi group. M (2003) plc no longer conducts any
business and does not intend to revive any business operations.
Under the terms of the M (2003) plc scheme of
arrangement, all of our assets, other than those necessary to
fund the administration of the scheme and the Company, will be
distributed to scheme creditors in accordance with the scheme of
arrangement. The Directors expect to dissolve
M (2003) plc at approximately the same time as the
completion of these distributions to scheme creditors. While
M (2003) plc shares, and ADRs representing
M (2003) plc shares, remain outstanding following the
effectiveness of the financial restructuring, the Directors
believe that there will be no circumstances under which any
additional value will be returned to shareholders of
M (2003) plc. As that is the case, we believe
M (2003) plc shares and ADRs are worthless.
4
Item 4: Information on the Company
HISTORY AND DEVELOPMENT OF THE COMPANY
M (2003) plc, formerly Marconi plc, is a public
limited company incorporated and domiciled in England and Wales
and operating under the U.K. Companies Act 1985.
M (2003) plc was incorporated as a public limited
company in England in 1999. The address and telephone number of
its registered office are 8 Salisbury Square, London
EC4Y 8BB, United Kingdom and
+44 (0)24 7656 5606.
Until the effectiveness on May 19, 2003 of the schemes of
arrangement described below under the caption Financial
Restructuring, M (2003) plc was the parent
company of Marconi Corporation plc and its subsidiaries, which
operated (and continues to operate) the business of the Marconi
group. As a result of the effectiveness of those schemes of
arrangement, we ceased to be a member of the Marconi group and
ceased business operations. Unless the context otherwise
requires, the discussion below relates to the business and
operations of the Marconi group that was, and continues to be,
operated through the former direct and indirect subsidiaries of
M (2003) plc.
On October 21, 2003, Marconi plc changed its name to
M (2003) plc.
Financial Restructuring
On May 19, 2003, the Marconi group concluded its financial
restructuring. The restructuring was effected through two
separate schemes of arrangement under the U.K.
Companies Act 1985. A scheme of arrangement is a procedure under
English law through which a company may enter into a voluntary
compromise or arrangement with one or more classes of its
creditors to effect a restructuring of its financial
obligations. One scheme of arrangement involved all of the
creditors of Marconi Corporation plc, other than certain
excepted categories of creditors but including the syndicate
banks and bondholders to whom our primary financial indebtedness
was owed. The second scheme of arrangement involved creditors of
M (2003) plc. As a result of the restructuring, the
shares that M (2003) plc held in Marconi Corporation
plc were cancelled. Marconi Corporation plc became the new
parent holding company of the Marconi group, and
M (2003) plc ceased to be a member of the Marconi
group.
The financial restructuring covered approximately
£4.8 billion of creditors claims, comprising
£4.0 billion of syndicated bank debt and externally
held U.S. dollar and euro denominated bonds and
£800 million of related party debt. In exchange for
the cancellation of their claims against us and Marconi
Corporation plc, on May 19, 2003 the creditors covered by
these schemes of arrangement received:
|
|
|
|
|
Cash: £340 million in cash; |
|
|
|
Senior Notes: U.S.$717,139,584 (approximately
£437 million) in aggregate principal amount of new
guaranteed senior secured notes due April 2008 issued by Marconi
Corporation plc, with interest payable quarterly in cash at a
rate of 8% per annum. Since the implementation of the schemes,
Marconi Corporation plc has fully redeemed for U.S. dollars
these Notes; |
|
|
|
Junior Notes: U.S.$486,881,472 (approximately
£297 million) in aggregate principal amount of new
guaranteed junior secured notes due October 2008 issued by
Marconi Corporation plc, with interest payable quarterly in cash
at a rate of 10% per annum or, at our option, in kind, by
issuing additional junior notes, at a rate of 12% per
annum. Since the implementation of the schemes, Marconi
Corporation plc has fully redeemed for U.S. dollars these
Notes; and |
|
|
|
Marconi Corporation plc Shares: 995 million ordinary
shares, representing 99.5% of Marconi Corporation plcs
issued ordinary share capital on May 19, 2003. |
In addition, Marconi Corporation plc issued 5 million
ordinary shares, representing 0.5% of its issued ordinary share
capital upon consummation of the financial restructuring, and
warrants to subscribe for up to 50 million additional
ordinary shares, equal to 5% of its issued ordinary share
capital upon consummation of the financial restructuring, to
shareholders of M (2003) plc. In connection with the
restructuring Marconi
5
Corporation plc listed its ordinary shares on the London Stock
Exchange and established an ADR program in respect of those
shares.
In connection with the financial restructuring, our ordinary
shares were delisted from the London Stock Exchange. Under the
terms of the M (2003) plc scheme of arrangement, all
of our assets, other than those necessary to fund the
administration of the scheme and the Company, will be
distributed to scheme creditors in accordance with the scheme of
arrangement. The Directors expect to dissolve
M (2003) plc at approximately the same time as the
completion of these distributions to scheme creditors. While
M (2003) plc shares, and ADRs representing
M (2003) plc shares, remain outstanding following the
effectiveness of the financial restructuring, the Directors
believe that there will be no circumstances under which any
additional value will be returned to shareholders of
M (2003) plc. As that is the case, the Directors
believe M (2003) plc shares and ADRs are worthless.
Prior to the financial restructuring, we had issued options in
respect of M (2003) plcs shares to Marconi group
employees under a number of different option plans. In order to
hedge some of the potential cost of acquiring the shares
necessary to satisfy the groups obligations under these
plans, we, through an ESOP trust entity, entered into contracts,
which we refer to as ESOP derivative transactions, to purchase
shares in the future at prices that were fixed at the dates of
the contracts. In connection with the restructuring process, on
March 26, 2003 we and Marconi Corporation plc entered into
a final settlement with the banks, which we refer to as the ESOP
derivative banks, that were the counterparties under the ESOP
derivative transactions. This settlement agreement definitively
settled the claims of the ESOP derivative banks against
M (2003) plc and Marconi Corporation plc in relation
to the ESOP derivative transactions. Under the settlement, which
was conditional on Marconi Corporation plcs financial
restructuring becoming effective, we paid a total of
£35 million to the ESOP derivative banks and the
claims of the ESOP derivative banks under the ESOP derivative
transactions were excluded from our and Marconi Corporation
plcs schemes of arrangement.
On May 6, 2004, the M (2003) plc scheme
supervisors authorized a further distribution to creditors as a
consequence of the settlement of a Marconi Corporation plc
scheme claim, referred to as the Millionerrors claim. At the
time of this distribution, the prevailing share price and
exchange rate resulted in the distribution of consideration
approximately equivalent to 2 pence per pound of admitted claims.
BUSINESS OVERVIEW
Until the effectiveness on May 19, 2003 of the schemes of
arrangement of M (2003) plc and Marconi Corporation
plc, M (2003) plc was the parent company of Marconi
Corporation plc and its subsidiaries, which operated (and
continues to operate) the business of the Marconi group. As a
result of the effectiveness of the M (2003) plc and
Marconi Corporation plc schemes of arrangement, we ceased to be
a member of the Marconi group and ceased our business
operations. The business of the Marconi group continues to be
operated by Marconi Corporation plc, the current parent holding
company of the Marconi group, and its subsidiaries.
As a consequence of the schemes of arrangement, we no longer
conduct any business, and we do not intend to revive any
business operations.
Prior to May 19, 2003, we, through our former Marconi group
subsidiaries, were a global vendor of telecommunications
equipment and services. A description of the business that we
used to conduct is contained in our previous annual reports on
Form 20-F filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission. Our only remaining, dormant and non trading,
subsidiaries are listed in Note 23 of the Notes to the
Consolidated Financial Statements included in this annual report.
PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT
Our registered office is located at 8 Salisbury Square,
London EC4Y 8BB, United Kingdom. We currently have no
property, plant or equipment.
6
Item 5: Operating and Financial Review and
Prospects
On May 19, 2003, the Marconi group concluded its financial
restructuring, which was effected through two separate schemes
of arrangement under the U.K. Companies Act 1985. As a result of
the restructuring, we ceased to be a member of the Marconi group
and ceased business operations. See the additional discussion of
our financial restructuring in History and Development of
the Company Financial Restructuring. Because
the financial restructuring occurred approximately seven weeks
into fiscal 2004, and because we ceased business operations
thereafter, any discussion of our results or of specific
financial statement line items between fiscal 2005 and fiscal
2004 and between fiscal 2004 and fiscal 2003 is not meaningful.
In connection with the financial restructuring of the Marconi
Group, the shares that M (2003) plc held in Marconi
Corporation plc were cancelled, and M (2003) plc
divested fully of its interests in the Marconi Group for nil
proceeds. This resulted in a gain of £3,281 million on
the transfer of ownership of the Marconi Group being equivalent
to its consolidated net liabilities. On the same date the scheme
of arrangement of Marconi Corporation plc came into effect
resulting in an £804 million receivable from the
Marconi Group being waived by M (2003) plc and its
subsidiary undertakings reducing the net gain to
£2,477 million. This has been accounted for by a gain
of £2,183 million recorded in the consolidated
statement of operations within other income and a credit of
£294 million recorded in the consolidated statement of
shareholders equity relating principally to the minimum
pension liability.
Expenses incurred by the Scheme Supervisors in the
administration of the scheme post May 19, 2003 to
March 31, 2004 were approximately £0.3 million.
Expenses incurred by the Scheme Supervisors in fiscal 2005 were
approximately £0.5 million.
Because the financial restructuring was implemented by way of
two separate schemes of arrangement under section 425 of
the U.K. Companies Act 1985, the gain on financial restructuring
described above will not give rise to any taxable amounts.
Pursuant to the M (2003) plc scheme of arrangement,
the remaining assets of M (2003) plc will be
distributed to scheme creditors, and it is intended that
M (2003) plc will be dissolved. There will be no
circumstances under which any value will be returned to
shareholders under the terms of the scheme.
The company has no external sources of liquidity. The company
has cash on hand sufficient to meet our anticipated ongoing
administrative costs for the foreseeable future. Under the terms
of the M (2003) plc scheme of arrangement, all of our
assets, other than those necessary to fund the administration of
the scheme and the Company, will be distributed to scheme
creditors in accordance with the scheme of arrangement. The
Directors expect to dissolve M (2003) plc at
approximately the same time as the completion of these
distributions to our scheme creditors. The Directors therefore
believe that there will be no future circumstances under which
the Company will have any internal sources of liquidity other
than the cash currently on hand.
At March 31, 2005, our cash and cash equivalents totalled
£8 million, as compared to £9 million at
March 31, 2004. All of our debts were compromised at the
time of the financial restructuring of the Marconi group, and we
have incurred no new debt since that time.
As at March 31, 2005, we had no off-balance sheet
arrangements that have or are reasonably likely to have a
current or future effect on our financial condition, revenues,
expenses, results of operations, liquidity, capital expenditures
or capital resources.
We have no contractual obligations of the type requiring tabular
disclosure under Item 5.F.
7
Item 6: Directors, Senior Management and
Employees
DIRECTORS AND SENIOR MANAGEMENT
Directors
The current members of our board of directors are:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name |
|
Age | |
|
Title |
|
|
| |
|
|
John Jameson White
|
|
|
67 |
|
|
Chairman |
Christopher James Shaw
|
|
|
52 |
|
|
Director |
Richard Anthony Robinson
|
|
|
57 |
|
|
Director |
The business address of John White, Christopher Shaw and Richard
Robinson is 8 Salisbury Square, London EC4Y 8BB, United Kingdom.
John Jameson White was appointed Chairman of our
board of directors in August 2003. Mr. White, who is a
solicitor, became a partner with the law firm CMS Cameron
McKenna in 1964 having joined the firm in 1957. During his
period with the firm, he became the first Chairman of the CMS
European Banking Group.
Christopher James Shaw was appointed to our board
of directors in August 2003. Mr. Shaw became a licensed
insolvency practitioner in 1987. He has worked for KPMG LLP
since May 1989 as a senior manager in their corporate recovery
department, primarily on members voluntary liquidations.
Richard Anthony Robinson was appointed to our
board of directors in September 2003. He is a Chartered
Accountant and is currently working as a consultant. Previously
he held various finance appointments within Marconi Corporation
plc (previously The General Electric Company, p.l.c.) between
1987 to 1991 and from 1993 to 2003, latterly as VP
Corporate Finance. He spent 2 years working for Guinness
PLC between 1991 and 1993. He is also a Director of Plessey
Holdings Ltd, Osram AS and Torro Advisors Ltd.
Executive Officers
Kevin David Smith was appointed company secretary
in August 2003. Mr. Smith is a chartered secretary and was
previously company secretary at Kalamazoo Computer Group plc.
COMPENSATION
The names of our current directors appear in the table at the
beginning of this section. The following table shows emoluments
paid or payable to all directors of the company as a group for
the period to March 31, 2005.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
|
£000 | |
|
£000 | |
|
|
| |
Directors emoluments
|
|
|
48 |
|
|
|
338 |
|
Amounts receivable under long-term incentive schemes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Company contributions to money purchase pension schemes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
61 |
|
Amounts paid to third parties in respect of directors
services
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7 |
|
The aggregate of emoluments and amounts receivable under
long-term incentive schemes of the highest paid director was
£23,834 (March 31, 2004: £113,000 to a former
director). None of the directors received any compensation in
fiscal 2005 in respect of any pension or defined benefit scheme.
8
BOARD PRACTICES
General
Our board currently comprises a chairman and two directors, one
of whom acts as the companys Chief Financial Officer. The
board also acts as the companys audit committee. There are
no other board committees.
The board meets as and when circumstances require to discharge
its statutory and regulatory obligations and to consider matters
relating to the companys scheme of arrangement.
The periods during which the current directors have served are
given above, in Directors and Senior
Management. Each director was originally appointed for a
term of two years, and, upon the agreement of the rest of the
board, each of the directors appointments was recently
renewed for a further year on identical terms. The
directors service contracts provide that upon termination,
the directors are not entitled to any fee, compensation or other
payment in respect of the period after the termination date.
EMPLOYEES
All of our former employees were transferred to Marconi
Corporation plc as a result of our restructuring on May 19,
2003. The company currently has no employees.
SHARE OWNERSHIP
The following table shows the interests of directors in ordinary
shares of 5 pence each in M (2003) plc:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
On | |
|
|
|
|
|
At March 31, | |
|
|
Appointment | |
|
Acquired | |
|
Disposed | |
|
2005 | |
|
|
| |
R A Robinson
|
|
|
11,442 |
|
|
|
nil |
|
|
|
nil |
|
|
|
11,442 |
|
C J Shaw
|
|
|
nil |
|
|
|
nil |
|
|
|
nil |
|
|
|
nil |
|
J J White
|
|
|
nil |
|
|
|
nil |
|
|
|
nil |
|
|
|
nil |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
R A Robinson had the following interests in share options as a
result of his previous employment within the Marconi Group.
There are no circumstances under which any value will be
attributable to these share options:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
On | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At March 31, | |
Plan |
|
Appointment | |
|
Granted | |
|
Exercised | |
|
Lapsed | |
|
2005 | |
|
|
| |
The Marconi Launch Plan
|
|
|
1,000 |
|
|
|
nil |
|
|
|
nil |
|
|
|
nil |
|
|
|
1,000 |
|
The Marconi Long Term Incentive Plan
|
|
|
15,164 |
|
|
|
nil |
|
|
|
nil |
|
|
|
nil |
|
|
|
15,164 |
|
Total
|
|
|
16,164 |
|
|
|
nil |
|
|
|
nil |
|
|
|
nil |
|
|
|
16,164 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Item 7: Major Shareholders and Related Party
Transactions
MAJOR SHAREHOLDERS
Trading in our shares on the London Stock Exchange ceased on
May 16, 2003, and our shares were subsequently delisted.
As at September 16, 2005, there were 742 registered holders
of our American depositary receipts. Each ADR issued represents
two ordinary shares. Of these registered ADR holders,
716 have addresses in the United States. One of the
registered ADR holders is The Depository Trust Company, which
represents the total number of ADRs held in book-entry form. The
ADR holders collectively held 98,775,470 ADRs, or
approximately 7.1% of our total issued share capital as at
September 16, 2005.
9
To our knowledge, there are no holders of 5% or more of the
ordinary shares in M (2003) plc as at September [28],
2005.
To our knowledge, we are not owned or controlled, directly or
indirectly, by another corporation, by any foreign government or
by any other natural or legal person or persons, severally or
jointly.
To our knowledge, other than our recent restructuring described
herein, there are no arrangements the operation of which may at
a subsequent date result in us undergoing a change in control.
RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
Since the completion of our financial restructuring in May,
2003, we have not entered into any transactions with related
parties.
Item 8: Financial Information
LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
Under the M (2003) plc scheme of arrangement, any and
all legal claims against M (2003) plc as at
March 27, 2003, whether liquidated or unliquidated, or
actual or contingent, were compromised. Therefore, there are no
circumstances under which any of these claims will result in
liability for M (2003) plc. Certain of these claims,
however, may result in payments by the M (2003) plc scheme
of arrangement. Where such a claim is pending or threatened and
may have or has had in the recent past, including at least the
12 months immediately preceding the date of this annual
report, a significant effect on the financial position of the
scheme as a whole, this is set out below. Where a liquidated sum
is claimed, a de minimis figure of £5 million has been
applied in determining which claims may have a significant
effect. The figures given are the full amounts claimed by the
claimants in each case, which may be much greater than the
amounts the claimants realistically believe they can recover. We
and our other former group companies intend to defend claims
vigorously. While we believe that we have meritorious defenses,
the duration and outcome of the litigation are not predictable
at this point.
The following represents the largest recent or outstanding
claims made against us:
|
|
|
|
|
Systems Management Specialists, Inc., or SMS, is a defendant in
a demand for arbitration brought by Esprit de Corp, or Esprit,
in April 2002. This action relates to two outsourcing agreements
entered into by Esprit and SMS in 1995 and 1999; Esprit alleges
that SMS breached its obligations under the agreements and is
seeking damages in range of U.S.$8.8-U.S.$18.2 million.
M (2003) plc was originally a party to the arbitration
demand under a legal theory alleging that SMS and M (2003)
plc are alter egos of one another. In April 2002,
M (2003) plc filed a complaint for declaratory and
injunctive relief in the U.S. District Court for the
Central District of California, to enjoin Esprits attempt
to proceed in arbitration against M (2003) plc. In
June, 2002, Esprit and M (2003) plc filed a joint
stipulation to stay and enjoin the arbitration preceding as to
M (2003) plc. In July 2002, M (2003) plc filed a
motion to dismiss Esprits claims and a motion to stay the
federal court proceeding until after the arbitration between SMS
and Esprit concluded. The Court denied
M (2003) plcs motion to dismiss, but granted
M (2003) plcs motion to stay, and, therefore,
Esprit will be permitted to proceed on its claims against
M (2003) plc only after the arbitration between SMS
and Esprit is completed, and only to the extent Esprit prevails
on any of its claims in the arbitration against SMS. The parties
had agreed to conduct the arbitration hearing between
October 13-24, 2003, and significant discovery had taken
place. Beginning in September 2003, the parties reached a
settlement in principle in the U.S.$710,000-U.S.$725,000 range,
payable to Esprit in exchange for a full release and settlement
of the actions. Effective September 29, 2004, the parties
executed a Settlement Agreement, settling the case for
U.S.$725,000 and such amount was paid by SMS to Esprit. |
10
|
|
|
|
|
Marconi Corporation plc and Marconi Commerce Systems Inc., or
MCSI, are defendants in an action brought by a former employee,
Larry Anthony Gillus, or Gillus. The complaint alleges that
Gillus suffered racial discrimination and subsequent retaliatory
action whilst employed by Gilbarco, subsequently known as MCSI,
which has now been sold to subsidiaries of Danaher Corporation
plc. A second claim has been brought against
M (2003) plc and MCSI for retaliation and intentional
infliction of emotional distress alleged to have occurred after
he brought the original action. Additionally, on
September 10, 2003, the Court granted plaintiffs
motion to add a breach of employment contract claim and
injunctive relief. Gillus counsel has in the past stated
that he is seeking a total of U.S.$19 million in respect of
both claims. Potential liabilities in respect of the claim
against Marconi Corporation plc and M (2003) plc were
compromised pursuant to its restructuring. As a result, on
November 5, 2003, Gillus voluntarily dismissed without
prejudice Marconi Corporation plc and M (2003) plc
from the cases. Discovery was commenced and completed with
respect to the remaining defendants. The case was settled for
U.S.$400,000 at mediation on December 7, 2004. A Settlement
Agreement and Release was executed on January 18, 2005. |
|
|
|
Marconi Corporation plc, M (2003) plc, Marconi Inc.
and Marconi Data Systems Inc. are defendants in an action
brought by a former employee, Thomas Edeus, or Edeus. The
complaint asserts three causes of action; firstly that Edeus was
unlawfully deprived of benefits to which he was entitled under
Marconi Data Systems Incs United States severance plan;
secondly for failure to provide Edeus with a summary plan
description relating to the severance plan; and thirdly for age
discrimination in employment. The plaintiff has purported to
have made out claims in various specified amounts totaling over
U.S.$901,000, some of which may be in the alternative, and also
unspecified punitive damages, liquidated damages and front and
back pay, making the impact of this claim on us and the former
group difficult to assess. An answer and affirmative defenses
have been filed on behalf of all defendants. On June 5,
2003, the court entered an order providing as follows:
Plaintiff having advised the court that one or more
defendants [sic] are in Bankruptcy, this action is placed
on the courts [suspense] calendar pending disposition of
the bankruptcy case. Plaintiff is directed to file a notice for
hearing a motion to reinstate upon disposition of the bankruptcy
proceedings. Potential liabilities in respect of the claim
against Marconi Corporation plc and M (2003) plc were
compromised pursuant to our restructuring. The M (2003) plc
and Marconi Corporation plc bankruptcy case in the New York
courts resulted in a permanent injunction. The bankruptcy case
was closed on February 14, 2005 and this does not affect
the permanent injunction that applies to Edeus claim. |
|
|
|
In April 2002, 11 former employees of Ten Square Inc.
brought a claim against directors of their company for fraud in
reducing their compensation package before liquidating the
company and restarting it under a different name. The claim was
for a total of $2,160,050.91. The plaintiffs alleged that
M (2003) plc was a director of Ten Square Inc.
although in fact M (2003) plc only had a right to
appoint a director, a right M (2003) plc had not
recently exercised. Marconi Ventures was also named as a
plaintiff on September 9, 2002. The plaintiffs did not
serve proceedings upon M (2003) plc and on
October 24, 2002 an order for the dismissal of the claim
against M (2003) plc and Marconi Ventures was entered.
However, M (2003) plc was named in the second amended
complaint which was filed on December 24, 2002.
M (2003) plc is aware of the action but has not been
served and is not yet a party to it. Potential liabilities in
respect of the claim against M (2003) plc have been
compromised pursuant to the M (2003) plc scheme of
arrangement. |
Since March 27, 2003, we are not and have not been engaged
in, nor, so far as we are aware, do we have pending or
threatened by or against us, any additional legal or arbitration
proceedings which may have or have had a significant effect on
our financial position as a whole.
11
DIVIDEND POLICY
As a result of its scheme of arrangement, M (2003) plc
shall not be making any dividends or distributions to its
shareholders. See Key Information Risk
Factors As a result of our restructuring, we have
ceased business operations and shall dispose of our remaining
assets for the benefit of our creditors.
SIGNIFICANT CHANGES
There has been no significant change in our financial position
since March 31, 2005.
Item 9: The Offer and Listing
STOCK PRICE HISTORY/ MARKETS
From November 30, 1999, the ordinary shares of
M (2003) plc were listed on the London Stock Exchange.
On May 16, 2003, trading in the ordinary shares of
M (2003) plc on the London Stock Exchange ceased and
delisting followed. On October 17, 2000, the ADRs of
M (2003) plc were added to quotation on the NASDAQ
National Market, and on July 3, 2002, they were removed
from quotation on the NASDAQ National Market and began trading
on the over-the-counter bulletin board in the United States. The
following table summarizes information regarding prices and
trading of the M (2003) plc ordinary shares on the
London Stock Exchange and the ADRs on the NASDAQ National Market
and the over-the-counter bulletin board for the periods
indicated:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
London Stock | |
|
|
|
|
Exchange | |
|
ADRs | |
|
|
(Sterling pence) | |
|
(US dollars) | |
|
|
High | |
|
Low | |
|
High | |
|
Low | |
|
|
| |
Fiscal Year
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
April 1, 2000 to March 31, 2001
|
|
|
1250.00 |
|
|
|
340.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
April 1, 2001 to March 31, 2002
|
|
|
424.00 |
|
|
|
6.25 |
|
|
|
12.85 |
|
|
|
0.18 |
|
April 1, 2002 to March 31, 2003
|
|
|
12.55 |
|
|
|
1.27 |
|
|
|
0.44 |
|
|
|
0.04 |
|
April 1, 2003 to March 31, 2004
|
|
|
1.80 |
(*) |
|
|
0.60 |
(*) |
|
|
0.18 |
|
|
|
0.03 |
|
April 1, 2004 to March 31, 2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.08 |
|
|
|
0.00 |
|
Fiscal Quarter
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
April 1, 2003 to June 30, 2003
|
|
|
1.80 |
(*) |
|
|
0.60 |
(*) |
|
|
0.09 |
|
|
|
0.03 |
|
July 1, 2003 to September 30, 2003
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.18 |
|
|
|
0.07 |
|
October 1, 2003 to December 31, 2003
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.12 |
|
|
|
0.04 |
|
January 1, 2004 to March 31, 2004
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.08 |
|
|
|
0.03 |
|
April 1, 2004 to June 30, 2004
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.08 |
|
|
|
0.01 |
|
July 1, 2004 to September 30, 2004
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.02 |
|
|
|
0.01 |
|
October 1, 2004 to December 31, 2004
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.05 |
|
|
|
0.00 |
|
January 1, 2005 to March 31, 2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.01 |
|
|
|
0.00 |
|
Month
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
April 2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.00 |
|
|
|
0.00 |
|
May 2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.00 |
|
|
|
0.00 |
|
June 2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.00 |
|
|
|
0.00 |
|
July 2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.00 |
|
|
|
0.00 |
|
August 2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.00 |
|
|
|
0.00 |
|
September 2005 (through September 16)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.00 |
|
|
|
0.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
* |
To May 16, 2003, which was the last day of dealings in
M (2003) plc shares |
12
Item 10: Additional Information
MEMORANDUM AND ARTICLES OF ASSOCIATION
Please see our annual report on Form 20-F for the period to
March 31, 2003 for a description of our memorandum and
articles of association.
MATERIAL CONTRACTS
During the past two years, we have not entered into any
material contracts.
EXCHANGE CONTROLS
There are currently no decrees or regulations under the laws of
the United Kingdom restricting the import or export of capital
or affecting the remittance of dividends or other payments to
holders of M (2003) plc ordinary shares or American
depositary shares who are non-residents of the United Kingdom.
However, as explained elsewhere in this document, there will be
no future remittances as dividends under any circumstances.
TAXATION
United States Federal Income Taxation
Prospective and existing holders should be aware that the
Directors opinion is that under no circumstances will any
Shareholders or ADR holders ever receive any payments out of
M (2003) plcs assets.
The following summary describes material U.S. federal
income tax consequences that may be relevant to the acquisition,
ownership and disposition of our ordinary shares and/or ADRs.
This summary addresses only U.S. federal income tax
considerations for holders that hold our ordinary shares and/or
ADRs as capital assets. This summary does not purport to be a
comprehensive description of all the tax considerations that may
be relevant to a decision to acquire our ordinary shares and/or
ADRs. In particular, this summary does not address tax
considerations applicable to holders that may be subject to
special tax rules including, without limitation, the following:
(a) financial institutions; (b) insurance companies;
(c) dealers or traders in securities, currencies or
notional principal contracts; (d) tax-exempt entities;
(e) persons that will hold our ordinary shares and/or ADRs
as part of a hedging or conversion
transaction or as a position in a straddle or as
part of a synthetic security or other integrated
transaction for U.S. federal income tax purposes;
(f) persons that have a functional currency
other than the U.S. dollar; (g) persons that own (or
are deemed to own) 10% or more (by voting power) of our share
capital; (h) regulated investment companies;
(i) persons who hold our ordinary shares and/or ADRs
through partnerships or other pass-through entities;
(j) real estate investment trusts; and
(k) S corporations. Further, this summary does not
address alternative minimum tax consequences.
This summary is based on the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as
amended, U.S. Treasury regulations and judicial and
administrative interpretations thereof, in each case as in
effect and available on the date of this document. All of the
foregoing is subject to change, which change could apply
retroactively and could affect the tax consequences described
below.
Prospective holders should consult their own tax adviser with
respect to the U.S. federal, estate, state, local, gift and
other tax consequences of acquiring, owning and disposing of our
ordinary shares and/or ADRs.
U.S. Holders should also review the discussion below
under United Kingdom Taxation for the
U.K. tax consequences to a U.S. holder of our ordinary
shares and/or ADRs.
13
For purposes of this summary a U.S. holder is a
beneficial owner of our ordinary shares and/or ADRs that is, for
U.S. federal income tax purposes: (a) a citizen or
resident of the United States; (b) a corporation created or
organized in or under the laws of the United States or any state
thereof, including the District of Columbia; (c) an estate,
the income of which is subject to U.S. federal income
taxation regardless of its source; or (d) a trust if
(i) a court within the United States is able to exercise
primary supervision over its administration and (ii) one or
more U.S. persons have the authority to control all of the
substantial decisions of such trust. If a partnership holds our
ordinary shares or ADRs, the consequences to a partner will
generally depend upon the status of the partner and upon the
activities of the partnership. A partner of a partnership
holding our ordinary shares or ADRs should consult its tax
adviser. A Non-US holder is a beneficial owner of
our ordinary shares or ADRs that is not a U.S. holder.
Subject to the discussion Passive Foreign
Investment Company Considerations, the gross amount of any
distribution that is actually or constructively received by a
U.S. holder with respect to our ordinary shares and/or ADRs
will be a dividend included in gross income of a
U.S. holder as ordinary income. Dividends paid on our
ordinary shares and/or ADRs generally will constitute income
from sources outside the United States and will not be eligible
for the dividends received deduction to United
States corporate shareholders. The amount of any distribution of
property other than cash will be the fair market value of the
property on the date of the distribution.
The gross amount of any distribution paid in foreign currency
will be included in the gross income of a U.S. holder in an
amount equal to the U.S. dollar value of the foreign
currency calculated by reference to the exchange rate in effect
on the date received by the U.S. holder, regardless of
whether the foreign currency is converted into
U.S. dollars. If the foreign currency is converted into
U.S. dollars on the date of receipt, a U.S. holder
generally should not be required to recognize foreign currency
gain or loss in respect of the dividend. If the foreign currency
received as a dividend is not converted into U.S. dollars
on the date of receipt, a U.S. holder will have a basis in
the foreign currency equal to its U.S. dollar value on the
date of receipt. Any gain or loss on a subsequent conversion or
other disposition of the foreign currency will be treated as
ordinary income or loss, and will generally be income or loss
from sources within the United States for foreign tax credit
limitation purposes.
Subject to the discussion under Backup
Withholding and Information Reporting, a
Non-U.S. holder generally will not be subject to
U.S. federal income or withholding tax on dividends
received on our ordinary shares and/or ADRs unless that income
is effectively connected with the conduct by that
Non-U.S. holder of a trade or business within the United
States.
However, we do not expect to pay a dividend in the foreseeable
future.
|
|
|
Sale or Other Disposition of Marconi plc Shares and/or
ADRs |
Subject to the discussion Passive Foreign
Investment Company Considerations, a U.S. holder will
generally recognize a gain or loss for U.S. federal income
tax purposes upon the sale or exchange of our ordinary shares
and/or ADRs in an amount equal to the difference between the
U.S. dollar value of the amount realized from such sale or
exchange and the U.S. holders tax basis in those
ordinary shares or ADRs, as the case may be. That gain or loss
will be a capital gain or loss and will be long-term capital
gain (taxable at a reduced rate for individuals, trusts or
estates) if our ordinary shares or ADRs, as appropriate, were
held for more than one year. Any such gain or loss would
generally be treated as from sources within the United States.
The deductibility of capital losses is subject to significant
limitations.
A U.S. holder that receives foreign currency on the sale or
other disposition of our ordinary shares and/or ADRs will
realize an amount equal to the U.S. dollar value of the
foreign currency on the date of sale (or in the case of cash
basis and electing accrual basis taxpayers, the U.S. dollar
value of the foreign currency on settlement date). If a
U.S. holder receives foreign currency upon a sale or
exchange of our ordinary shares and/or ADRs, gain or loss, if
any, recognized on the subsequent sale, conversion or
disposition of that foreign currency will be ordinary income or
loss, and will generally be income or loss
14
from sources within the United States for foreign tax credit
limitation purposes. However, if such foreign currency is
converted into U.S. dollars on the date received by the
U.S. holder, a cash basis or electing accrual
U.S. holder should not recognize any gain or loss on such
conversion.
Subject to the discussion under Backup
Withholding and Information Reporting, a
Non-U.S. holder generally will not be subject to
U.S. federal income or withholding tax on any gain realized
on the sale or exchange of our ordinary shares and/or ADRs
unless: (a) that gain is effectively connected with the
conduct by that Non-U.S. holder of a trade or business in
the United States, or (b) in the case of any gain realized
by an individual Non-U.S. holder, that holder is present in
the United States for 183 days or more in the taxable year
of the sale or exchange and certain other conditions are met.
|
|
|
Passive Foreign Investment Company Considerations |
A corporation organized outside the United States generally will
be classified as passive foreign investment company, or a PFIC,
for U.S. federal income tax purposes in any taxable year in
which either: (a) at least 75% of its gross income is
passive income, or (b) on average at least 50%
of the gross value of its assets is attributable to assets that
produce passive income or are held for the
production of passive income. Passive income for this purpose
generally includes dividends, interest, royalties, rents and
gains from commodities and securities transactions. In
determining whether it is a PFIC a foreign corporation is
required to take into account a pro rata portion of the income
and assets of each corporation in which it owns, directly or
indirectly, at least a 25% interest.
Based on our current assets it is likely that we were
characterized as a PFIC for U.S. federal income tax
purposes for the taxable year ended 31 March, 2005. Because
this is a factual determination made annually at the end of the
taxable year, there can be no assurance that we will not be
considered a PFIC for any future taxable year. If we were a PFIC
in any year, special, possibly materially adverse, consequences
would, as discussed below, result for U.S. holders.
If we are a PFIC in any year during which a U.S. holder
owns our ordinary shares and/or ADRs the U.S. holder will
be subject to additional taxes on any excess distributions
received from us and any gain realized from the sale or other
disposition of our ordinary shares and/or ADRs (whether or not
we continue to be a PFIC). A U.S. holder has an excess
distribution to the extent that distributions on our ordinary
shares and/or ADRs during a taxable year exceed 125% of the
average amount received during the three preceding taxable years
(or, if shorter, the U.S. holders holding period). To
compute the tax on the excess distributions or any gain,
(a) the excess distribution or the gain is allocated
ratably over the U.S. holders holding period,
(b) the amount allocated to the current taxable year and
any year before we became a PFIC is taxed as ordinary income in
the current year, and (c) the amount allocated to other
taxable years is taxed at the highest applicable marginal rate
in effect for each year and an interest charge is imposed to
recover the deemed benefit from the deferred payment of the tax
attributable to each year.
Some of the rules with respect to distributions and dispositions
described above may be avoided if a U.S. holder makes a
valid mark-to-market election (in which case,
subject to certain limitations, the U.S. holder would
essentially be required to take into account the difference, if
any, between the fair market value and the adjusted tax basis of
our ordinary shares or ADRs, as the case may be, at the end of a
taxable year as ordinary income (or, subject to certain
limitations, ordinary loss), in calculating its income for such
year). In addition, gains from an actual sale or other
disposition of our ordinary shares or ADRs will be treated as
ordinary income, and any losses will be treated as ordinary
losses to the extent of any mark-to-market gains for
prior years. A mark-to-market election is only
available to U.S. holders in any tax year that the PFIC
stock is considered regularly traded on a
qualified exchange within the meaning of applicable
U.S. Treasury regulations. PFIC stock is regularly
traded if, among other requirements, it is traded on at
least 15 days during each calendar quarter. Prospective
holders should consult their own tax advisers as to whether our
ordinary shares and/or ADRs would qualify for the mark-to-market
election and whether such election is advisable.
The foregoing rules with respect to distributions and
dispositions may be avoided if a U.S. holder is eligible
for and timely makes a valid QEF election (in which
case the U.S. holder would be required to
15
include in income on a current basis its pro rata share of our
ordinary income and net capital gains). In order to be able to
make the QEF election, we would be required to provide a
U.S. holder with certain information. We may decide not to
provide the required information.
Each U.S. holder of our ordinary shares and/or ADRs must
make an annual return on IRS Form 8621, reporting
distributions received and gains realized with respect to each
PFIC in which it holds a direct or indirect interest.
Holders are urged to consult their own tax advisers regarding
whether an investment in our ordinary shares or ADRs will be
treated as an investment in PFIC stock and the consequences of
an investment in a PFIC.
Backup Withholding and Information Reporting
Backup withholding and information reporting requirements may
apply to certain payments to U.S. holders of dividends on
our ordinary shares and/or ADRs and to the proceeds of a sale or
redemption of our ordinary shares or ADRs. We, our agent, a
broker, or any paying agent, as the case may be, may be required
to withhold tax from any payment that is subject to backup
withholding at a maximum rate of 28% of such payment if the
U.S. holder fails (a) to furnish the
U.S. holders taxpayer identification number,
(b) to certify that the U.S. holder is not subject to
backup withholding or (c) to otherwise comply with the
applicable requirements of the backup withholding rules. The
backup withholding rate may be subject to change each year.
Certain U.S. holders, including, among others,
corporations, are not subject to the backup withholding and
information reporting requirements. Non-U.S. holders who
hold our ordinary shares or ADRs through a U.S. broker or
agent or through the U.S. office of a non-U.S. broker
or agent may be required to comply with applicable certification
procedures to establish that they are not U.S. holders in
order to avoid the application of such information reporting
requirements and backup withholding. Backup withholding is not
an additional tax. Any amounts withheld under the backup
withholding rules from a payment to a holder generally may be
claimed as a credit against such holders U.S. federal
income tax liability provided that the required information is
furnished timely to the IRS.
|
|
|
Prospective holders should consult their own tax advisers
as to their qualification for exemption from backup withholding
and the procedure for obtaining this exemption. |
United Kingdom Taxation
The following summary describes certain U.K. tax consequences
for certain holders of our ordinary shares and/or ADRs. It is
intended to apply only to U.S. holders (as defined in the
section above under United States Federal Income
Taxation) who are not also residents of the U.K. for U.K.
tax purposes or carrying on a business in the U.K. through a
branch, agency or permanent establishment and who hold our
ordinary shares and/or ADRs as investments. It may not apply to
certain classes of holders, such as dealers in securities.
This summary is based on current U.K. law and H.M.
Revenue & Customs (HMRC) practice at the date
hereof and on the terms of the double tax treaty concluded
between the governments of the U.S. and the U.K. on
July 24, 2001 and amended by a protocol agreed on
July 12, 2002 and which came into force on March 31,
2003 (the Treaty). If you are in doubt as to whether you
are entitled to benefits under the Treaty, you should consult
your own tax advisers.
This summary is not intended to be comprehensive, and
prospective holders of our ordinary shares and ADRs are
recommended to consult their professional advisers to determine
their tax position.
Under current U.K. taxation legislation, no tax is required to
be withheld at source from cash dividends paid on our ordinary
shares and/or ADRs. U.S. shareholders are not entitled to
any U.K. tax credit (or to any payment from HMRC in respect of
any tax credit) on dividends paid on our ordinary shares and/or
ADRs. However, we do not expect to pay a dividend in the
foreseeable future.
16
|
|
|
Taxation of capital gains |
A U.S. shareholder who is not resident, and in the case of
an individual also not ordinarily resident, in the U.K. for U.K.
tax purposes will not be liable for U.K. taxation on capital
gains realized on the disposal of his or her shares or ADRs
unless at the time of the disposal:
|
|
|
|
|
the U.S. shareholder carries on a trade, profession or
vocation in the U.K. through a permanent establishment; and |
|
|
|
the shares or ADRs are or have been used, held or acquired for
the purposes of the trade, profession, vocation or permanent
establishment. |
A U.S. shareholder who is an individual and who has ceased
to be resident or ordinarily resident for tax purposes in the
U.K. on or after March 17, 1998 and continues not to be
resident or ordinarily resident in the U.K. for a period of less
than five years of assessment and who disposes of his
shares or ADRs during that period may also be liable on his
return to the U.K. to U.K. tax on capital gains, subject to any
available exemption or relief, even though he or she is not
resident or ordinarily resident in the U.K. at the time of the
disposal. There are special rules for individuals who leave the
U.K. part way through a year of assessment. Pursuant to the
Finance Act 2005, these rules also apply to an individual who is
resident or ordinarily resident in the U.K. but falls to be
regarded as resident outside the U.K. for the purposes of any
double tax treaty (a Treaty Non-Resident) and who becomes
Treaty Non-Resident on or after March 16, 2005.
|
|
|
U.K. stamp duty and stamp duty reserve tax (SDRT) |
U.K. stamp duty or SDRT is payable upon the transfer or issue of
shares to, or to a nominee or agent of, a person whose business
is or includes issuing depositary receipts or providing
clearance services. For this purpose, the current rate of stamp
duty and SDRT is 1.5%, rounded up, in the case of stamp duty, to
the nearest £5. The rate is applied, in each case, to the
amount or value of the consideration or, in some circumstances,
to the value of the shares.
Provided that the instrument of transfer is not executed in the
U.K. and remains at all subsequent times outside the U.K., no
U.K. stamp duty will be payable on the transfer of ADRs. An
agreement to transfer ADRs will not give rise to a liability to
SDRT.
The purchase of shares, as opposed to ADRs, may give rise to a
charge to U.K. stamp duty or SDRT at the rate of 0.5%, rounded
up, in the case of stamp duty, to the nearest £5. The rate
is applied to the price payable for the shares at the time of
the transfer or agreement to transfer. SDRT is generally the
liability of the purchaser. It is customarily also the purchaser
who pays U.K. stamp duty.
DOCUMENTS ON DISPLAY
We are subject to the informational requirements of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and file reports and other
information with the Securities and Exchange Commission. You may
read and copy all or any portion of the reports and their
exhibits at the public reference facilities maintained by the
Securities and Exchange Commission at 100 F Street, NE,
Washington, D.C. 20549. Copies of such material may also be
obtained at prescribed rates by writing to the Public Reference
Section of the Securities and Exchange Commission at 100 F
Street, NE, Washington, D.C., 20549. You may obtain more
information on the operation of the Public Reference Room by
calling the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330. The Securities and Exchange
Commission also maintains a web site that contains reports and
information about issuers, like us, who file electronically with
the SEC. The address of that web site is www.sec.gov.
17
Item 11: Quantitative and Qualitative
Disclosures about Market Risk
Since the conclusion of the financial restructuring of the
Marconi group on May 19, 2003, M (2003) plc has
not had any material exposure to market risk.
Item 12: Description of Securities other than
Equity Securities
This item is not applicable.
18
PART II
Item 13: Defaults, Dividend Arrearages and
Delinquencies
Since our financial restructuring, we have had no defaults,
arrearages or delinquencies.
Item 14: Material Modifications to the Rights of
Security Holders and Use of Proceeds
Since our financial restructuring, neither we nor anyone else
have taken any actions that would have modified or qualified the
rights evidenced by any class of our registered securities.
Item 15: Controls and Procedures
Under the supervision of and with the participation of our Chief
Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, we evaluated the
effectiveness and design and operation of our disclosure
controls and procedures as of March 31, 2005. Based upon
that evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
Officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures
were effective as of that date. Since the date of the
evaluation, there have been no significant changes in our
internal controls or in other factors that could significantly
affect the controls. Therefore, no corrective actions were taken.
Item 16A: Audit Committee Financial
Expert
We consider Richard Anthony Robinson to be the financial expert
serving on our audit committee as defined by Item 16A(b).
Mr. Robinson is an independent non-executive director.
Item 16B: Code of Ethics
We have not adopted a code of ethics as defined by the
instructions to Item 16B. Since we no longer conduct any
business and do not intend to revive any business operations, we
do not believe that a code of ethics is necessary.
Item 16C: Principal Accountant Fees and
Services
Audit and audit-related fees
Audit and audit-related fees consist of professional services
rendered by our principal accounting firm, Deloitte &
Touche LLP, the member firms of Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu, and
their respective affiliates (collectively
Deloitte & Touche) for the audits of the
consolidated financial statements of the Company, statutory
audits, income tax provision procedures and other work in
connection with documents filed with the SEC. Our audit and
audit related fees were £35,000 in fiscal 2005 (2004:
£75,000).
Tax fees
Tax fees charged by Deloitte and Touche. £nil for each
fiscal 2005 and fiscal 2004.
Other
Fees for other services were £nil in each of fiscal 2005
and fiscal 2004.
Pre approval procedures for Services
All audit and non-audit services performed by the auditors are
pre-approved by the Companys audit committee, following a
competitive tender where appropriate, in accordance with the
committees auditors independence policy.
Item 16E: Purchases of Equity Securities by the
Issuer and Affiliated Purchasers
During fiscal 2005, neither we nor any affiliated
purchaser made any purchases of any class of our equity
securities that is registered pursuant to section 12 of the
Exchange Act.
19
PART III
Item 17: Financial Statements
Financial statements are being furnished pursuant to the
instructions of Item 18 of Form 20-F.
Item 18: Financial Statements
M (2003) plc is furnishing consolidated financial
statements beginning at page F-l.
Item 19: Exhibits
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.1** |
|
|
Memorandum and Articles of Association of M (2003) plc |
|
2.1 |
|
|
Specimen ordinary share certificate of M (2003) plc |
|
2.2 |
|
|
Deposit Agreement dated as of September 6, 2000 Between
M (2003) plc and The Bank of New York, as depositary,
and Owners and beneficial holders of American Depositary Receipts |
|
2.3 |
|
|
American Depositary Receipt of M (2003) plc (included
in Exhibit 2.2) |
|
2.4 |
|
|
Marconi Corporation plc and M (2003) plcs
Proposals in Relation to Schemes of Arrangement under
Section 425 of the UK Companies Act 1985, dated
March 31, 2003 between Marconi Corporation plc,
M (2003) plc and their respective scheme creditors |
|
12.1* |
|
|
Certification required by Rule 13a-14(a) or
Rule 15d-14(a), as adopted Pursuant to Section 302 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
|
12.2* |
|
|
Certification required by Rule 13a-14(a) or
Rule 15d-14(a), as adopted Pursuant to Section 302 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
|
13.1* |
|
|
Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002 |
|
|
|
|
* |
Filed with this annual report. |
|
|
** |
Incorporated by reference to the Annual Report on Form 20-F
(File No. 0-30294) filed with the SEC on September 28,
2001. |
|
|
|
Incorporated by reference to the Registration Statement on
Form 20-F (File No. 0-30924) filed with the SEC on
September 5, 2000. |
|
|
|
Incorporated by reference to the Report under cover of
Form 6-K (File No. 0-30924) furnished to the SEC on
March 31, 2003. |
20
SIGNATURES
The registrant hereby certifies that it meets all the
requirements for filing on Form 20-F and that it has duly
caused and authorized the undersigned to sign this annual report
on its behalf.
|
|
|
|
|
Name: Kevin David Smith |
|
Title: Company Secretary |
|
Date: September 30, 2005 |
21
INDEX TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
M (2003) plc and subsidiaries
Consolidated financial statements as of March 31, 2005
and 2004 and
for the three years ended March 31, 2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page | |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
F-2 |
|
|
|
|
F-3 |
|
|
|
|
F-4 |
|
|
|
|
F-5 |
|
|
|
|
F-7 |
|
|
|
|
F-8 |
|
|
|
|
F-9 |
|
F-1
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the board of directors and shareholders of M (2003) plc:
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of
M (2003) plc and its subsidiaries and joint ventures
(together the Company) as of March 31, 2005 and
2004 and the related consolidated statements of operations, cash
flows, other comprehensive income/(loss), and shareholders
equity for each of the three fiscal years in the period ended
March 31, 2005. These consolidated financial statements are
the responsibility of the Companys management. Our
responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated
financial statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those
standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated financial
statements are free of material misstatement. The Company is not
required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of
its internal control over financial reporting. An audit includes
consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a
basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the
circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion
on the effectiveness of the Companys internal control over
financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An
audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting
the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An
audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and
significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating
the overall consolidated financial statement presentation. We
believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our
opinion.
In our opinion, such consolidated financial statements referred
to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial
position of the Company as of March 31, 2005 and 2004, and
the consolidated results of its operations and its cash flows
for each of the three fiscal years in the period ended
March 31, 2005 in conformity with accounting principles
generally accepted in the United States of America.
Our audits also comprehended the transactions of certain pounds
sterling amounts into US Dollars and, in our opinion, such
transactions have been made in conformity with the basis
described in note 2. Such US dollar amounts are
presented solely for the convenience of readers in the United
States of America.
Deloitte & Touche LLP
Birmingham, England
30 September 2005
F-2
M (2003) plc and subsidiaries
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, | |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
|
U.S.$000 | |
|
£000 | |
|
£000 | |
|
|
| |
ASSETS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
15,366 |
|
|
|
8,130 |
|
|
|
8,871 |
|
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets
|
|
|
257 |
|
|
|
136 |
|
|
|
90 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets
|
|
|
15,623 |
|
|
|
8,266 |
|
|
|
8,961 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL ASSETS
|
|
|
15,623 |
|
|
|
8,266 |
|
|
|
8,961 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities
|
|
|
783 |
|
|
|
414 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities
|
|
|
783 |
|
|
|
414 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shareholders equity/(deficit)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ordinary shares, £0.05 par value;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Authorized: 6,000,000,000 shares in 2005 and 2004;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issued and outstanding: 2,793,011,951 shares in 2005 and
2004
|
|
|
264,600 |
|
|
|
139,651 |
|
|
|
139,651 |
|
|
Additional paid-in capital
|
|
|
1,245,510 |
|
|
|
659,349 |
|
|
|
659,349 |
|
|
Accumulated deficit
|
|
|
(1,495,270 |
) |
|
|
(791,148 |
) |
|
|
(790,040 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total shareholders equity
|
|
|
14,840 |
|
|
|
7,852 |
|
|
|
8,960 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY
|
|
|
15,623 |
|
|
|
8,266 |
|
|
|
8,961 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
F-3
M (2003) plc and subsidiaries
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal Year Ended March 31, | |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
|
U.S.$000 | |
|
£000 | |
|
£000 | |
|
£000 | |
|
|
| |
Revenue:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Network equipment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100,000 |
|
|
|
1,131,000 |
|
|
Network services
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
68,000 |
|
|
|
743,000 |
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Revenue
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
168,000 |
|
|
|
1,896,000 |
|
Direct costs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
138,000 |
|
|
|
1,522,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross margin
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30,000 |
|
|
|
374,000 |
|
Operating expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling, general and administrative
|
|
|
2,363 |
|
|
|
1,284 |
|
|
|
49,000 |
|
|
|
356,000 |
|
|
Research and development
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31,000 |
|
|
|
290,000 |
|
|
Amortization of goodwill and intangibles
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,000 |
|
|
|
44,000 |
|
|
Business restructuring charges
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,000 |
|
|
|
230,000 |
|
|
Impairment of long-lived assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
69,000 |
|
|
Gain on disposal of businesses, net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5,000 |
) |
|
Other income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating (income)/expenses
|
|
|
2,363 |
|
|
|
1,284 |
|
|
|
88,000 |
|
|
|
982,000 |
|
Operating income/(loss)
|
|
|
(2,363 |
) |
|
|
(1,284 |
) |
|
|
(58,000 |
) |
|
|
(608,000 |
) |
Other income/(expense):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss on sale of investments, net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5,000 |
) |
|
Impairment of investments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(40,000 |
) |
|
Gain on financial restructuring
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,183,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gain on settlement of equity forward contracts
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
123,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other Income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
34,000 |
|
|
Interest income
|
|
|
664 |
|
|
|
361 |
|
|
|
29,000 |
|
|
|
45,000 |
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(329,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income/(loss) from continuing operations before income taxes,
minority interests
|
|
|
(1,699 |
) |
|
|
(923 |
) |
|
|
2,277,000 |
|
|
|
(903,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income tax charge
|
|
|
(340 |
) |
|
|
(185 |
) |
|
|
(1,000 |
) |
|
|
209,000 |
|
|
Equity in net loss of affiliates
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(62,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Loss) from continuing operations
|
|
|
(2,039 |
) |
|
|
(1,108 |
) |
|
|
2,276,000 |
|
|
|
(756,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Discontinued operations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from discontinued operations, net of tax of £nil
(2004, £nil, and 2003, £2)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(74,000 |
) |
|
Gain on sale of discontinued operations, net of tax of £nil
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (loss)/income
|
|
|
(2,039 |
) |
|
|
(1,108 |
) |
|
|
2,276,000 |
|
|
|
(807,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings per share basic
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income/(loss) from continuing operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.92 |
|
|
|
(0.27 |
) |
|
Loss from discontinued operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.3 |
) |
|
Gain on sale of discontinued operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
Net income/(loss)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.92 |
|
|
|
(0.29 |
) |
Earnings per share diluted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Income/loss) from continuing operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.92 |
|
|
|
(0.27 |
) |
|
Loss from discontinued operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(.03 |
) |
|
Gain on sale of discontinued operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.01 |
|
Net income/(loss)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.92 |
|
|
|
(0.29 |
) |
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
F-4
M (2003) plc and subsidiaries
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal year ended March 31, | |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
|
U.S.$000 | |
|
£000 | |
|
£000 | |
|
£000 | |
|
|
| |
Cash flows from operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income/(loss)
|
|
|
(2,039 |
) |
|
|
(1,108 |
) |
|
|
2,276,000 |
|
|
|
(807,000 |
) |
Adjustments to reconcile net income/(loss) to net cash used in
operating activities of continuing operations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from discontinued operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
74,000 |
|
Gain on sale of discontinued operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(23,000 |
) |
Cash paid on settlement of equity forward contracts
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(35,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Loss on disposal of businesses and properties
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,000 |
|
Gain on financial restructuring
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,183,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Gain I settlement of equity forward contracts
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(123,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Loss on sale of investments in affiliates
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,000 |
|
Stock compensation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,000 |
|
|
|
14,000 |
|
Impairment of long-lived assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
69,000 |
|
Impairment of investments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
40,000 |
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16,000 |
|
|
|
169,000 |
|
Provision for doubtful accounts
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(10,000 |
) |
Provision for allowance for inventory write off
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25,000 |
|
Other income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(34,000 |
) |
Profit on disposal of property, plant and equipment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(9,000 |
) |
Change in current and deferred taxes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(177,000 |
) |
Equity in net loss of affiliates
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
62,000 |
|
Cash paid for restructuring
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(20,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by/(used) in discontinued operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,000 |
|
|
|
(80,000 |
) |
Changes in operating assets and liabilities, net of the effect
of acquisitions:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable
|
|
|
(85 |
) |
|
|
(46 |
) |
|
|
100,000 |
|
|
|
137,000 |
|
|
Inventories
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,000 |
|
|
|
228,000 |
|
|
Prepaid expenses and other assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(21,000 |
) |
|
Accounts payable
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(26,000 |
) |
|
|
(175,000 |
) |
|
Accrued expenses and other liabilities
|
|
|
760 |
|
|
|
413 |
|
|
|
(29,000 |
) |
|
|
(154,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in operating activities
|
|
|
(1,364 |
) |
|
|
(741 |
) |
|
|
(12,000 |
) |
|
|
(664,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
F-5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal year ended March 31, | |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
|
U.S.$000 | |
|
£000 | |
|
£000 | |
|
£000 | |
|
|
| |
Cash flows from investing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Maturities and sales of debt and marketable equity securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(209,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases of debt and marketable equity securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(20,000 |
) |
|
Purchases of property, plant and equipment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5,000 |
) |
|
|
(35,000 |
) |
|
Proceeds from the sale of property, plant and equipment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30,000 |
|
|
Cash (outflow)/received from disposals
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(568,000 |
) |
|
|
436,000 |
|
|
Cash element of scheme consideration
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(333,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
Collaterised cash
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided used in investing activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,115,000 |
) |
|
|
411,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from financing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Short-term debt repayments, net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(22,000 |
) |
|
|
(30,000 |
) |
|
Term loan repayments, net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,000 |
) |
|
|
(45,000 |
) |
|
Restricted cash transferred to secured accounts
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
964,000 |
|
|
|
(692,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in financing activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
941,000 |
|
|
|
(767,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effects of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(28,000 |
) |
|
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(186,000 |
) |
|
|
(1,048,000 |
) |
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of year
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
195,000 |
|
|
|
1,243,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents, end of year
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,000 |
|
|
|
195,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental disclosure of cash flow activity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash payments for interest
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,000 |
) |
|
|
134,000 |
|
Cash repayment for income taxes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,000 |
) |
|
|
(31,000 |
) |
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
F-6
M (2003) plc and subsidiaries
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OTHER COMPREHENSIVE
INCOME/(LOSS)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal year ended March 31, | |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
|
U.S.$000 | |
|
£000 | |
|
£000 | |
|
£000 | |
|
|
| |
Other comprehensive income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss
|
|
|
(2,039 |
) |
|
|
(1,108 |
) |
|
|
2,276,000 |
|
|
|
(807,000 |
) |
Other comprehensive income/(loss):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized gains on derivative Instruments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22,000 |
|
|
Accumulated translation adjustments, (net of income tax and
reclassification adjustments)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
62,000 |
|
|
Minimum pension liability, (net of income tax of £nil)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
295,000 |
|
|
|
(295,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other comprehensive income/(loss)
|
|
|
(2,039 |
) |
|
|
(1,108 |
) |
|
|
2,571,000 |
|
|
|
(1,018,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Disclosure of tax and reclassification amounts:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized gains on derivative instruments,
net of tax of £1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,000 |
|
|
|
22,000 |
|
|
Less: reclassification adjustment for loss included in net loss,
net of tax of £nil
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized gains on derivative Instruments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated translation adjustments, net of tax of £nil
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(14,000 |
) |
|
|
62,000 |
|
|
Less: reclassification adjustment for gains included in net
income/(loss), net of tax of £nil
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net translation adjustments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
62,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
F-7
M (2003) plc and subsidiaries
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF SHAREHOLDERS
EQUITY/(DEFICIT)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional | |
|
Retained | |
|
other | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ordinary shares | |
|
paid-in | |
|
earnings/ | |
|
comprehensive | |
|
Treasury | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount | |
|
capital | |
|
(deficit) | |
|
income/(loss) | |
|
shares | |
|
Total | |
|
|
Shares | |
|
£000 | |
|
£000 | |
|
£000 | |
|
£000 | |
|
£000 | |
|
£000 | |
|
|
| |
As of March 31, 2002
|
|
|
2,792,638,820 |
|
|
|
139,651 |
|
|
|
1,063,349 |
|
|
|
(2,634,000 |
) |
|
|
(71,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,502,000 |
) |
|
Net loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(807,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(807,000 |
) |
|
Issuance of ordinary shares under share option plan
|
|
|
461,777 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acquisition and retirement of ordinary shares
|
|
|
(88,646 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value movements on derivative instruments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22,000 |
|
|
Stock-based compensation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,000 |
|
|
Shares issued by equity method investee
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,000 |
|
|
Translation adjustments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
62,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
62,000 |
|
|
Minimum pension liability
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(295,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(295,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of March 31, 2003
|
|
|
2,793,011,951 |
|
|
|
139,651 |
|
|
|
1,080,349 |
|
|
|
(3,441,000 |
) |
|
|
(282,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,503,000 |
) |
Net income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,275,960 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,275,960 |
|
Capital contribution for stock based compensation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(46,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(46,000 |
) |
Transfer on Financial Restructuring
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(375,000 |
) |
|
|
375,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Translation adjustments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(12,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(12,000 |
) |
Elimination upon financial restructuring
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
294,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
294,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of March 31, 2004
|
|
|
2,793,011,951 |
|
|
|
140,000 |
|
|
|
659,000 |
|
|
|
(790,040 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,960 |
|
Net loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,108 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,108 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of March 31, 2005
|
|
|
2,793,011,951 |
|
|
|
139,651 |
|
|
|
659,349 |
|
|
|
(791,148 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,852 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
F-8
M (2003) plc and subsidiaries
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
|
|
1. |
Nature of Business and basis of preparation: |
Nature of business
Until May 19, 2003, the Company was the ultimate holding
company for the Marconi Group. Through its subsidiaries the
Marconi Group was a multi-regional vendor of telecommunications
equipment and services and was organized into two main
divisions: Core and Capital. The Core business included the
provision of optical networks, broadband routing and switching,
broadband access, outside plant and power, other network
equipment and associated installation, maintenance and other
value-added services. The Marconi Groups customers
included telecommunications companies and providers of internet
services for their public networks and some large corporations,
government departments and agencies, utilities and educational
institutions for their private networks. The Capital business
comprised certain non-core businesses that were managed for
value and ultimately for disposal. These included an investment
in Easynet Group plc as well as a number of other minor
activities, investments and assets with whom the Company had a
base of installed equipment.
On May 19, 2003, M (2003) plc (the Company) and its
former subsidiary Marconi Corporation plc concluded a financial
restructuring (the Financial Restructuring), which
was effected through two separate schemes of arrangement under
the U.K. Companies Act 1985 as described in note 3. Since
the Financial Restructuring the Group consists of the Company
and its non-trading and dormant subsidiaries listed in
note 23. Therefore the Company and Group have no trading or
business activities.
As explained in note 3, the remaining assets of the Company
will be distributed over time to its creditors, following which
it is intended that the Company and its subsidiaries will be
liquidated or dissolved.
The name of the Company was changed from Marconi plc to
M (2003) plc on October 21, 2003.
Basis of preparation
The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been
prepared on a going concern basis, which contemplates the
realization of assets and the satisfaction of liabilities in the
normal course of business. As explained in note 3,
following the Financial Restructuring of May 19, 2003 and
pursuant to the Companys Scheme of Arrangement, the
remaining assets of the Company will be distributed over time to
its creditors in order to settle liabilities as they are
incurred. Following this it is intended that the Company will be
liquidated or dissolved, however this is not expected to occur
within the next twelve months.
|
|
2. |
Summary of significant accounting policies |
Basis of consolidation
The accompanying consolidated financial statements include the
accounts of M (2003) plc and its subsidiaries that are more
than 50% owned and controlled. Investments in affiliates in
which the Company exercises significant influence but not
control (generally those with a 20-50% ownership interest) are
accounted for under the equity method of accounting. Investments
in non-listed entities in which the Company has less than a 20%
ownership interest are accounted for under the cost method. All
intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated upon
consolidation.
Use of estimates
The preparation of the consolidated financial statements and
related disclosures in conformity with accounting principles
generally accepted in the United States of America
(U.S. GAAP) requires management to make estimates and
assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and
liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities
at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts
of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Estimates
are used for, but not limited to, the accounting for
F-9
doubtful accounts, inventory reserves, depreciation and
amortization, sales returns, warranty costs, taxes, certain
accruals, payables, long-term contract profit estimates,
employee benefits, long-lived asset impairment calculations and
contingencies. Actual results could differ from these estimates.
Income taxes
The Company recognizes deferred tax assets and liabilities using
enacted tax rates to calculate temporary differences between the
tax basis of assets and liabilities and the financial statement
carrying amounts. The Company recognizes a valuation allowance
against such deferred tax assets when it is more likely
than not that such assets will not be recovered. During
the fiscal year 2003 all deferred tax assets, without offsetting
liabilities in the same jurisdiction, were fully reserved.
Foreign currency
The consolidated financial statements are presented in U.K.
pounds sterling. The functional currency of each of M
(2003) plcs subsidiaries is the local currency in
which each subsidiary is located. Transactions in currencies
other than the functional currency are translated at the
exchange rate in effect at the date of each transaction.
Differences in exchange rates during the period between the date
a transaction denominated in a foreign currency is consummated
and the date on which it is either settled or translated are
recognized in the statement of operations.
Net income and cash flows of non-U.K. pounds sterling
subsidiaries and equity investments are translated at the
average rates of exchange during the year. The assets and
liabilities of such entities are translated at year-end rates of
exchange. Translation adjustments are included in other
comprehensive income/(loss), as a separate component of
shareholders equity/(deficit). Key exchange rates relative
to U.K. pounds sterling used are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average rates |
|
Year-end rates |
|
|
Fiscal year ended March 31, |
|
As of March 31, |
|
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
|
|
U.S. Dollar
|
|
|
1.84 |
|
|
|
1.70 |
|
|
|
1.55 |
|
|
|
1.89 |
|
|
|
1.84 |
|
Euro
|
|
|
1.47 |
|
|
|
1.44 |
|
|
|
1.55 |
|
|
|
1.45 |
|
|
|
1.50 |
|
Revenue
The Company recognizes revenue under Statement of Position
(SOP) 81-1, Accounting for Performance of
Construction-Type and certain Production-Type Contracts,
SOP 97-2, Software Revenue Recognition and SEC Staff
Accounting Bulletin No. 101, Revenue Recognition in
Financial Statements depending upon the terms of the
contract.
Revenue from product sales of hardware and software is
recognized when: persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists;
delivery has occurred or services have been rendered; customer
acceptance has occurred; the price to the buyer is fixed or
determinable; and collectability is reasonably assured.
Revenue from services is recognized at time of performance and
acceptance by the customer.
Revenue from multiple element contracts is allocated based on
the relative fair value of each individual element.
Revenues and estimated profits on long-term contracts are
recognized under the percentage-of-completion method of
accounting using a cost-to-cost methodology. Profit estimates
are revised periodically based on the latest available
information. When estimates of total contract revenues and costs
indicate a loss, a provision for the entire amount of the
contract loss is recognised in the period in which the loss
becomes evident.
Revenue is reported net of sales returns and allowances, early
settlement discounts, sales rebates settled by credit notes,
volume discounts and commissions earned by distributors.
F-10
|
|
|
Impairment or disposal of long-lived assets |
The Company evaluates the carrying value of long-lived assets
whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the
carrying value of the asset may be impaired. An impairment loss
is recognized when estimated future cash flows, on an
undiscounted basis, expected to result from the use of the
asset, including its disposition, is less than the carrying
value of the asset. The impairment loss is calculated by
comparing the carrying value of the asset with its fair value,
which is usually estimated using discounted cash flows expected
to be generated from the assets.
During fiscal 2005 tangible fixed assets were impaired by
£nil (2004, £nil and 2003, £69 million).
Long-lived assets are classified as held-for-sale when certain
criteria are met, which include: management commitment to a plan
to sell the assets; the availability of the assets for immediate
sale in their present condition; whether an active program to
locate buyers and other actions to sell the assets has been
initiated; whether the sale of the assets is probable and their
transfer is expected to qualify for recognition as a completed
sale within one year; whether the assets are being marketed at
reasonable prices in relation to their fair value; and how
unlikely it is that significant changes will be made to the plan
to sell the assets. The Company measures long-lived assets to be
disposed of by sale at the lower of carrying amount and fair
value less cost to sell. Fair value is determined using quoted
market prices or the anticipated cash flows discounted at a rate
commensurate with the risk involved.
The Company classifies an asset or asset group that will be
disposed of other than by sale as held and used until the
disposal transaction occurs. The asset or asset group continues
to be depreciated based on revisions to its estimated useful
life until the date of disposal or abandonment.
The Company has, in the past, issued share options to employees
under a number of different option plans, collectively known as
the ESOP. Under these plans, options may be
satisfied by way of a transfer of existing Company ordinary
shares acquired in the market by an employee trust or other
vehicle, or, under some of the plans only, by an issue of new
Company shares.
From January 2000, in order to hedge part of the potential cost
of the plans estimated at that time, the independent trustee of
the Marconi Employee Trust (MET), Bedell Cristin Trustees
Limited (BCTL), entered into swap contracts with
three financial institutions (the ESOP Derivative Banks) to
purchase a total of 40 million shares in the future at
prices which were fixed at the date of contract.
At March 31, 2003, the purchase of 38.5 million shares
under these contracts was outstanding. The maximum exposure
under the contracts was £337 million, plus accrued
finance charges. Certain contracts require BCTL to deposit cash
collateral with the relevant ESOP Derivative Banks if the share
price falls to certain levels stipulated in those contracts.
Prior to the financial restructuring the Company funded the
provision of this collateral. The carrying value of the
contracts at March 31, 2003 was £158 million.
An agreement was reached to settle these contracts and they were
closed out on May 19, 2003. The agreed settlement amount
was £35 million which resulted in a gain of
£123 million recorded in the consolidated statement of
operations as part of the gain on disposal of businesses.
At March 31, 2005 £nil (2004 £nil and 2003
£27 million) of cash balances was held in escrow with
respect to these equity forward contracts.
Prior to the financial restructuring, as part of its overall
risk management strategy, the Company used derivatives to
convert its fixed-rate debt into variable-rate debt, and to
hedge its foreign currency firm commitments. These derivatives
were typically designated as fair value hedges, to manage the
interest rate risk or foreign currency risk of the hedged item
accordingly. The carrying amount of the hedged item is adjusted
for gains or losses attributable to the hedged risk. This
unrealised gain or loss is offset by changes in the fair value
of the derivative. All hedging ineffectiveness is included in
earnings in the current period.
F-11
Hedge accounting is discontinued prospectively when the
derivative no longer qualifies as an effective hedge, the
derivative is terminated or sold, or on the sale or early
termination of the hedged item.
For fiscal 2004 and 2003, the ineffective portion of all the
Companys fair value hedges was immaterial as the terms of
the hedging instruments match the terms of the underlying hedged
items. The Company does not exclude any components of the
derivative gains and losses from the assessment of hedge
effectiveness. The amount recognized in earnings for hedged firm
commitments that no longer qualified for fair value hedges was
immaterial.
The Companys policy has been to finance its activities in
the same currencies as those used for its foreign investments in
order to hedge foreign currency exposure of net investments in
foreign operations. This policy has been implemented either by
financing in the related currency or using derivatives, such as
currency swaps, which provide a synthetic effect of a foreign
currency loan, thereby reducing the exchange risk. As a result
of the Financial Restructuring, which became effective
May 19, 2003, the Company does not have any borrowings. For
further information on the Companys Financial
Restructuring, refer to note 3.
For fiscal 2005, £nil (2004, £nil and 2003,
£169 million) of net gains related to non-derivative
instruments used as net investment hedges were included as a
cumulative translation adjustment in the statement of
comprehensive income/ (loss). These net gains principally offset
the net losses recorded on the respective net investments in
foreign currencies being hedged. The hedge instruments used by
the Company did not result in any material ineffectiveness.
Their notional amounts were similar to the net investments being
hedged as of the beginning of each quarter, and the currencies
of the hedging instrument and hedged item were the same.
The Company has used interest rate swaps to hedge the
uncertainty of future cash flows due to its floating rate debt,
and foreign currency forward exchange contracts that expire in
less than twelve months to hedge against the effect that
fluctuation in exchange rates may have on cash flow associated
with forecasted purchases.
Hedge accounting is discontinued prospectively when the
derivative no longer qualifies as an effective hedge or the
derivative is terminated or sold. On the sale or early
termination of the hedged item, gains and losses are immediately
reclassified to other (income)/expense.
For fiscal 2005 and 2004, the total ineffectiveness of all cash
flow hedges was immaterial since most of the terms of the
hedging instruments match the terms of the underlying hedged
items. The reclassification of gains and losses into earnings
from accumulated other comprehensive income as a result of the
discontinuance of cash flow hedges because management estimated
that it was still probable that original forecasted transactions
would occur by the end of the originally specified time period
or within an additional two months thereafter was also
immaterial.
For those hedging relationships that are designated as cash flow
hedges the respective effective portion of the gain or loss
recorded in other comprehensive income until it is necessary to
be adjusted against net income in order to offset the respective
change in expected future cash flows on the hedged transaction.
For fiscal 2003 the total amount of losses in accumulated other
comprehensive income of £23 million
(£1 million related to tax) was reclassified into
earnings during the year because, as a consequence of the
Financial Restructuring which occurred on May 19, 2003 it
was no longer probable at March 31, 2003 that the
forecasted transactions would occur.
|
|
|
Pension and other post-retirement benefits |
The Company accounts for its defined benefit pension plans and
its non-pension post-retirement benefit plans using actuarial
models required by SFAS 87, Employers Accounting
for Pensions, and SFAS 106,
F-12
Employers Accounting for Post-retirement Benefits Other
Than Pensions, respectively. These models use an attribution
approach that generally spreads individual events over the
service lives of the employees in the plan. Examples of
events are plan amendments and changes in actuarial
assumptions such as discount rate, rate of compensation
increases and mortality. The principle underlying the required
attribution approach is that employees render service over their
service lives on a relatively smooth basis and, therefore, the
income statement effects of pensions or non-pension
post-retirement benefit plans are earned in, and should follow,
the same pattern.
One of the main components of the net periodic pension
calculation is the expected long-term rate of return on plan
assets. The required use of expected long-term rate of return on
plan assets may result in recognized pension income that is
greater or less than the actual returns of those plan assets in
any given year. Over time, however, the expected long-term
returns are designed to approximate the actual long-term returns
and, therefore, result in a pattern of income and expense
recognition that more closely matches the pattern of the
services provided by the employees. Differences between actual
and expected returns (to the extent that they exceed 10% of the
market value of assets at the start of the period) are
recognized in the net periodic pension calculation over the
remaining average service lifetimes of active members.
The Company uses long-term historical actual return information,
the mix of investments that comprise plan assets, and future
estimates of long-term investment returns by reference to
external sources to develop its expected return on plan assets.
The discount rate assumptions used for pension and non-pension
post-retirement benefit plan accounting reflect the rates
available on high-quality fixed-income debt instruments on
March 31 of each year. The rate of compensation increase is
another significant assumption used in the actuarial model for
pension accounting and is determined by the Company based upon
its long-term plans for such increases. For retiree medical plan
accounting, the Company reviews external data and its own
historical trends for health care costs to determine the health
care cost trend rates.
If the unfunded accumulated benefit obligation exceeds the fair
value of the plan assets, the Company recognizes an additional
minimum liability that is at least equal to the unfunded
accumulated benefit obligation. Where an additional minimum
liability is recognized an intangible asset is recognized up to
the amount of any unrecognized prior service cost and the
balance is recognized through other comprehensive income.
Provisions for estimated expenses related to product warranties
are made at the time products are sold. These estimates are
established using historical information on the nature,
frequency, and average cost of warranty claims. Management
actively studies trends of warranty claims and takes action to
improve equipment quality and minimize warranty claims.
Management believes that the warranty reserve is appropriate;
however, actual claims incurred could differ from the original
estimates, requiring adjustments to the reserve.
Prior to the Financial Restructuring on May 19, 2003, the
Company had nine plans under which it granted options. The
Company accounted for employee share plans under Accounting
Principles Board Opinion (APB) No. 25,
Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees. No compensation
cost was recognized for ordinary shares and share options issued
under fixed plans with a price equal to fair market value. For
fixed plans, the measurement date was the grant date. The
Company recognized compensation cost for all ordinary shares and
stock options issued with an exercise price below fair market
value at the grant date and for plans subject to variable
accounting. For variable plans, the compensation cost was
re-measured on the basis of the current market value of
M (2003) plc stock at the end of each reporting
period. For ordinary options, such expense was recognized over
the vesting period of the options. The Company recognized
compensation expense for plans with performance conditions if
achievement of these conditions became probable.
F-13
At the date of the Financial Restructuring, options outstanding
under certain plans lapsed as the employees were no longer
employed by a group company. For the remaining share options
issued under variable plans, the compensation cost has been
re-measured on the basis of a £nil value of
M (2003) plc stock at March 31, 2005 because the
Companys shares were delisted as part of the
restructuring. The full expense has been recognized in the prior
year rather than over the vesting period as there are no
circumstances under which it is expected that any value will be
attributable the these share options.
The Company recognized compensation expense in fiscal 2005 of
£nil (2004 £9 million, 2003,
£14 million), related to stock options issued below
fair market value and those plans, which are variable. Had
compensation cost for the employee share plans been determined
consistent with the fair value methodology of SFAS 123,
Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation. No Share options
were granted in the fiscal years 2005, 2004 and 2003.
Under SFAS 123, the fair value of each option is estimated
on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option-pricing
model with the following weighted-average assumptions:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, | |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
|
| |
Risk-free interest rate
|
|
|
n/a |
|
|
|
n/a |
|
|
|
n/a |
|
Expected life (years)
|
|
|
n/a |
|
|
|
n/a |
|
|
|
n/a |
|
Assumed volatility
|
|
|
n/a |
|
|
|
n/a |
|
|
|
n/a |
|
Expected dividends
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
No stock options were granted during fiscal 2005, 2004 or 2003.
|
|
|
Other comprehensive income/(loss) |
Comprehensive income/ (loss) represents the net income/ (loss)
for the period plus the results of certain shareholders equity/
(deficit) changes that are not reflected in the consolidated
statements of operations.
The accumulated balances of other comprehensive income/ (loss)
are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net unrealized | |
|
Minimum | |
|
Accumulated | |
|
|
Net unrealized | |
|
Accumulated | |
|
gains/(losses) | |
|
pension | |
|
other | |
|
|
gains/(losses) | |
|
translation | |
|
on derivative | |
|
liability | |
|
comprehensive | |
|
|
on investments | |
|
adjustments | |
|
instruments | |
|
adjustment | |
|
income/(loss) | |
|
|
£000 | |
|
£000 | |
|
£000 | |
|
£000 | |
|
£000 | |
|
|
| |
As of March 31, 2003
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,000 |
|
|
|
(1,000 |
) |
|
|
(295,000 |
) |
|
|
(282,000 |
) |
Movement for the year
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(12,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(12,000 |
) |
Eliminated on financial restructuring
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,000 |
) |
|
|
1,000 |
|
|
|
295,000 |
|
|
|
294,000 |
|
As of March 31, 2004 and March 31, 2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings per share (EPS) are computed in accordance with
SFAS 128, Earnings per Share. Basic EPS is computed by
dividing consolidated net income by the weighted average number
of ordinary shares outstanding during the period. Diluted EPS is
computed by dividing consolidated net income by the sum of the
weighted average number of shares outstanding and the weighted
average number of potentially dilutive common shares, based on
the assumed exercise of dilutive share options under the
Companys stock option plans. Such potentially dilutive
common shares are excluded when the effect would be to reduce a
loss per share.
F-14
|
|
|
Recently issued accounting pronouncements not yet
adopted |
There are no recently issued accounting pronouncements that have
yet to be adopted that management believe could have a material
impact on the groups financial position and results of
operations.
The accompanying financial statements do not comprise
statutory accounts within the meaning of
Section 240 of the Companies Act 1985. The Companys
statutory accounts for fiscal 2005 prepared in accordance with
generally accepted accounting principles in the United Kingdom
(U.K. GAAP) will be delivered to the Registrar of Companies for
England and Wales.
The auditors report on those accounts was unqualified and
did not contain a statement under Section 237(2) or 237(3)
of the Companies Act 1985.
3. Financial restructuring
Until May 19, 2003, M (2003) plc (the
Company, formerly known as Marconi plc) was the ultimate
holding company for the Marconi Group.
On May 19, 2003, M (2003) plc and its then
subsidiary Marconi Corporation plc concluded a financial
restructuring (the Financial Restructuring), which
was effected through two separate schemes of arrangement under
the U.K. Companies Act 1985. Under the schemes of arrangement
Marconi Corporation plc issued new share capital and cancelled
the old shares held by the Company. Therefore the Company ceased
to be the ultimate holding company of the Marconi Group on
May 19, 2003 and from that date ceased to operate any
trading activities. Consequently, the entities included in the
consolidated financial statements presented in this document for
the period after May 19, 2003 are the Company and its
non-trading and dormant subsidiaries listed in note 23.
Trading in the Companys shares on the London Stock
Exchange ceased on May 16, 2003 and the Companys
shares were subsequently delisted.
The name of the Company changed from Marconi plc to
M (2003) plc on October 21, 2003.
At the date of the Financial Restructuring, as a result of the
shares the Company held in Marconi Corporation plc being
cancelled, the Company divested fully of its interests in the
Marconi Group for nil proceeds. This resulted in a gain of
£3,404 million on the transfer of ownership of the
Marconi Group being equivalent to its consolidated net
liabilities. On the same date the scheme of arrangement of
Marconi Corporation plc came into effect resulting in an
£804 million receivable from the Marconi Group being
waived by the Company and its subsidiary undertakings. The net
gain of £2,600 million was recorded in the
consolidated statement of operations within operating income.
F-15
The gain was calculated as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
£000 |
|
|
|
Net (liabilities)/ assets sold
|
|
|
|
|
Tangible fixed assets
|
|
|
251,000 |
|
Investments in joint ventures, affiliates and other investments
|
|
|
35,000 |
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
645,000 |
|
Intangibles, net
|
|
|
95,000 |
|
Inventory
|
|
|
237,000 |
|
Debtors
|
|
|
526,000 |
|
Net cash/ (overdrafts)
|
|
|
1,117,000 |
|
Borrowings (excluding overdrafts)
|
|
|
(4,770,000 |
) |
Accounts payable and other liabilities
|
|
|
(1,081,000 |
) |
Capital lease obligations
|
|
|
(5,000 |
) |
Finance lease creditors
|
|
|
(3,000 |
) |
Minority Interests
|
|
|
(3,000 |
) |
Retirement benefit deficit
|
|
|
(334,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,281,000 |
) |
Accounted for by:
|
|
|
|
|
Amounts waived on Scheme of Arrangement
|
|
|
804,000 |
|
Elimination of amounts included in shareholders equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
Minimum pension liability
|
|
|
295,000 |
|
|
Accumulated translation adjustments
|
|
|
(2,000 |
) |
|
Net unrealised gains on derivative instruments
|
|
|
1,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gain on Financial Restructuring
|
|
|
2,183,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Financial Restructuring was implemented by way of two
separate schemes of arrangement under section 425 of the
U.K. Companies Act 1985. As a result, the gain described above
will not give rise to any taxable amounts.
Pursuant to the Companys Scheme, the remaining assets of
the Company will be distributed over time to its creditors,
following which it is intended that the Company and its
remaining subsidiaries will be liquidated or dissolved. There
will be no circumstances under which any value will be returned
to shareholders under the terms of the Companys Scheme.
On the date of the financial restructuring, a further gain of
£123 million was realised on the settlement of equity
forward contracts outstanding and was recorded in the
consolidated statement of operations within other income. See
note 2 and note 18 for further discussion of these
equity forward contracts.
Expenses incurred by the Scheme Supervisors in the
administration of the Scheme post May 19, 2003 to
March 31, 2004 were approximately £0.3 million
and for the year ended March 31, 2005 were approximately
£0.5 million.
F-16
4. Balance sheet information
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, | |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
|
£000 | |
|
£000 | |
|
|
| |
Accounts receivable, net:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable
|
|
|
136 |
|
|
|
90 |
|
|
Allowance for doubtful accounts
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
136 |
|
|
|
90 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued income and other taxes
|
|
|
185 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued expenses
|
|
|
229 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
414 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation expense for fiscal 2005 was £nil (2004,
£10 million and 2003, £125 million). During
fiscal 2005 the Company capitalized £nil (2004, £nil
and 2003, £0.44 million) in interest expense related
to construction in progress.
During fiscal 2003 the Company disposed of land and buildings
with a net book value of £6 million for sales proceeds
of £17 million. The Company subsequently leased back
40% of these land and buildings under a 10-year sale and
leaseback agreement. The Company accounted for the 40% leased
back as a financing transaction. The lease agreement was
eliminated upon the financial restructuring.
During fiscal 2003 in conjunction with the business
restructuring and site rationalizations described in
note 6, Business restructuring charges, the Company
impaired property, plant and equipment by £69 million.
On May 19, 2003 the company underwent the financial
restructuring described in note 3. At the same date the
Company divested fully of its interests in the Marconi Group. It
is anticipated that the funds in hand (and any other assets) at
March 31, 2005 will be used to comply with the terms of the
M (2003) plc scheme of arrangement, and which
primarily relate to scheme expenses and complying with the
Companys statutory obligations. In the event that any of
the funds (or any assets) are not used they will be returned to
scheme creditors with the result that under no circumstances
will any of the funds (or other assets) ever become available to
pay any further dividends or distributions to shareholders.
|
|
5. |
Debt and credit facilities |
Prior to the financial restructuring the Companys
short-term borrowings consisted primarily of bank loans and
overdrafts and were unsecured.
Under the Companys 1998 syndicated credit agreement, a
group of banks committed a maximum of
4.5 billion
(approximately £2.8 billion) at March 31, 2001 on
an unsecured, revolving basis until March 25, 2003.
Effective March 22, 2002, the undrawn portion of this
facility was cancelled and the facility was placed on demand.
Under the terms of this agreement, borrowings bore interest of
0.175% per annum over London inter-bank offered rate (LIBOR). As
of March 31, 2003, the average interest rate was 6.36%.
No undrawn amounts were available to the Company under
outstanding credit facilities at March 31, 2005 or
March 31, 2004.
|
|
6. |
Business restructuring charges |
In September 2001, following the sudden and significant downturn
in trading in the global telecommunications markets, the results
of an operational review that had three main objectives were
announced. The original objectives were to reorganize the group
into two main reporting divisions: Core and
F-17
Capital, to reduce group indebtedness from
£4.4 billion at August 31, 2001 to between
£2.7 billion and £3.2 billion by
March 31, 2002 and to reduce the annual operating cost
base. These objectives were later revised to reflect further
operating cost base reductions during fiscal 2004.
When management reviews the operating income performance of the
segments described in note 10, Segment and related
information disclosures, management uses U.K. GAAP
operating profit/(loss) before goodwill and intangible asset
amortization, in process research and development write-offs,
U.K. GAAP operating exceptional items, gains and losses on
business disposal and the impact of less than 50% owned
affiliates. This measure allocated to those segments does not
include business restructuring charges, which relate to the
reorganization of the business as a whole. A segmental
allocation of restructuring charges is impracticable.
Consequently, a segmental analysis has not been provided.
The following tables show the activity by statement of
operations heading and the balances remaining in other
liabilities at March 31, 2005 and 2004 following the
implementation of actions required to achieve these objectives.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Charged | |
|
Utilized during | |
|
|
|
|
Balance at | |
|
during | |
|
fiscal 2005 | |
|
Balance at | |
|
|
March 31, | |
|
fiscal | |
|
Net cash | |
|
Non cash | |
|
March 31, | |
|
|
2004 | |
|
2005 | |
|
payments | |
|
movement | |
|
2005 | |
|
|
£ 000 | |
|
£000 | |
|
£000 | |
|
£000 | |
|
£000 | |
|
|
| |
Direct costs:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Manufacturing outsourcing
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Onerous contracts
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Business restructuring costs:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Employee severance
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Site rationalization
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contractual commitments and other restructuring
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Advisor fees
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Charged | |
|
Utilized during | |
|
|
|
|
Balance at | |
|
during | |
|
fiscal 2004 | |
|
Balance at | |
|
|
March 31, | |
|
fiscal | |
|
Net cash | |
|
Non cash | |
|
March 31, | |
|
|
2003 | |
|
2004 | |
|
payments | |
|
movement | |
|
2004 | |
|
|
£ 000 | |
|
£000 | |
|
£000 | |
|
£000 | |
|
£000 | |
|
|
| |
Direct costs:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Manufacturing outsourcing
|
|
|
8,000 |
|
|
|
(1,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Onerous contracts
|
|
|
6,000 |
|
|
|
(2,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,000 |
|
|
|
(3,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(11,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Business restructuring costs:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Employee severance
|
|
|
10,000 |
|
|
|
4,000 |
|
|
|
(12,000 |
) |
|
|
(2,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Site rationalization
|
|
|
46,000 |
|
|
|
1,000 |
|
|
|
(2,000 |
) |
|
|
(45,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Contractual commitments and other restructuring
|
|
|
3,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Advisor fees
|
|
|
10,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6,000 |
) |
|
|
(4,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
69,000 |
|
|
|
5,000 |
|
|
|
(20,000 |
) |
|
|
(54,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
83,000 |
|
|
|
2,000 |
|
|
|
(20,000 |
) |
|
|
(65,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-18
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Charged | |
|
Utilized during | |
|
|
|
|
Balance at | |
|
during | |
|
fiscal 2003 | |
|
Balance at | |
|
|
March 31, | |
|
fiscal | |
|
Net cash | |
|
Non cash | |
|
March 31, | |
|
|
2002 | |
|
2003 | |
|
payments | |
|
movement | |
|
2003 | |
|
|
£ 000 | |
|
£000 | |
|
£000 | |
|
£000 | |
|
£000 | |
|
|
| |
Direct costs:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inventory write-downs and related costs
|
|
|
40,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20,000 |
|
|
|
20,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
Manufacturing outsourcing
|
|
|
31,000 |
|
|
|
21,000 |
|
|
|
21,000 |
|
|
|
23,000 |
|
|
|
8,000 |
|
Onerous contracts
|
|
|
31,000 |
|
|
|
5,000 |
|
|
|
30,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
102,000 |
|
|
|
26,000 |
|
|
|
71,000 |
|
|
|
43,000 |
|
|
|
14,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Business restructuring costs:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Employee severance
|
|
|
30,000 |
|
|
|
128,000 |
|
|
|
148,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,000 |
|
Site rationalization
|
|
|
40,000 |
|
|
|
36,000 |
|
|
|
30,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
46,000 |
|
Contractual commitments and other restructuring
|
|
|
13,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,000 |
|
|
|
3,000 |
|
Systems implementation
|
|
|
24,000 |
|
|
|
(7,000 |
) |
|
|
17,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Advisor fees
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
73,000 |
|
|
|
63,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
107,000 |
|
|
|
230,000 |
|
|
|
258,000 |
|
|
|
10,000 |
|
|
|
69,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
209,000 |
|
|
|
256,000 |
|
|
|
329,000 |
|
|
|
53,000 |
|
|
|
83,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inventory write-downs and related costs
In fiscal 2003 the remaining balance of £40 million
was utilized in respect of inventory write-downs for
obsolescence and slow-moving provisions against a number of
product lines, predominantly optical networking products.
Manufacturing outsourcing
In fiscal 2003, the charge of £21 million represents
additional net costs to Jabil Circuit Inc. arising in the year
as a result of the decision to outsource certain manufacturing
operations. In fiscal 2004, £1 million was credited to
restructuring costs relating to the outsourcing of certain
manufacturing operations. The remaining balance was transferred
out of the group as part of the Financial Restructuring at
May 19, 2003.
Onerous contracts
The charge of £5 million in respect of onerous
contracts in fiscal 2003 represents certain liabilities to which
the Company was committed as a result of the operational
restructuring. This includes liabilities relating to equipment
leasing contracts and supply contracts under which we had agreed
to purchase minimum volumes of goods and services offering no
economic value to our business as a result of its reduced size.
In fiscal 2004 £2 million was released to the
statement of operations in relation to onerous contracts. The
remaining balance was transferred out of the group as part of
the Financial Restructuring at May 19, 2003.
Employee severance
As a consequence of the objective to reduce the annual operating
cost base, the Company recorded a charge of
£128 million during fiscal 2003 associated with
redundancy payments for approximately 7,500 employees. The
Company recorded a charge of £237 million to reflect
the charges. The Company made cash payments of
£148 million in fiscal 2003, associated with voluntary
redundancy payments for approximately 10,000 employees. In
fiscal 2004, a charge of £4 million was recorded as
part of the groups cost reduction actions and payments of
approximately £12 million were made. The remaining
balance was transferred out of the group as part of the
Financial Restructuring at May 19, 2003.
F-19
Site rationalization
The charge of £36 million in respect of site
rationalization in fiscal 2003 represents additional costs
associated with closing and consolidating various sites around
the world as part of the business restructuring. These site
closures and consolidations were all commenced prior to
December 15, 2002. In fiscal 2004, a charge of
£1 million was recorded as part of the groups
cost reduction actions and payments of approximately
£2 million were made. The remaining balance was
transferred out of the group as part of the Financial
Restructuring at May 19, 2003.
Contractual commitments and other restructuring
During fiscal 2002 a charge of £46 million was
recorded in respect of other costs associated with the
restructuring program. Payments of £26 million were
made during fiscal 2002 and an additional non-cash charge of
£7 million recorded, leaving a balance at
March 31, 2002 of £13 million. Of this balance,
costs of £10 million have been charged during fiscal
2003 and a balance of £3 million remains at
March 31, 2003. In fiscal 2004, the remaining balance was
transferred out of the group as part of the Financial
Restructuring at May 19, 2003.
Systems implementation
During fiscal 2002 the Group planned to implement a new global
information technology system. In light of the revised trading
outlook and the continued focus on cost reduction, the
implementation was terminated. The £73 million charge
in fiscal 2002 represents £43 million of capitalised
external consultancy costs associated with the implementation,
£24 million of hardware and software costs expensed,
and £6 million of other associated costs of the
project. Payments of £49 million were made in fiscal
2002. During fiscal 2003, the Company revised its previous
estimate of the overall costs leading to the release of
£7 million from the amounts accrued in fiscal 2002.
Payments of £17 million were made in fiscal 2003.
Advisor fees
The charge of £73 million in fiscal 2003 in respect of
advisor fees represents charges from the Companys external
advisors with respect to services rendered in fiscal 2003
related to the Financial
Restructuring payments of £63 million were made during
fiscal 2003 and a balance of £10 million remained at
March 31, 2003. In fiscal 2004, payments of approximately
£6 million were made and the remaining balance was
transferred out of the group as part of the Financial
Restructuring at May 19, 2003.
When management reviews the operating income performance of the
segments described in note 10, Segment and related
information disclosures, management uses the U.K. GAAP operating
profit/(loss) before goodwill and intangible asset amortization,
in process research and development write-offs, U.K. GAAP
operating exceptional items, gains and losses on business
disposal and the impact of less than 50% owned affiliates. This
measure allocated to those segments does not include goodwill
amortization charges. A segmental allocation of goodwill is
impracticable. Consequently, a segmental analysis has not been
provided.
The changes in the carrying amount of goodwill for the year
ended March 31, 2005, are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated | |
|
|
|
|
Cost | |
|
amortization | |
|
Total | |
|
|
£ 000 | |
|
£000 | |
|
£000 | |
|
|
| |
Balance at March 31, 2003
|
|
|
1,880,000 |
|
|
|
(1,223,000 |
) |
|
|
657,000 |
|
|
Goodwill disposed of
|
|
|
(1,877,000 |
) |
|
|
1,223,000 |
|
|
|
(654,000 |
) |
|
Translation adjustment
|
|
|
(3,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at March 31, 2004 and 2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-20
In accordance with SFAS 142, goodwill is no longer subject
to amortization, rather, it is subject to at least an annual
assessment of impairment, applying a fair-value based test. The
Company completed the SFAS 142 transitional impairment test
during the second quarter of fiscal 2003 and concluded that
there was no impairment of recorded goodwill. The assessment
measured the amount by which the carrying amounts of the
goodwill and intangible assets exceeded the present value of
expected future cash flows from operations.
The total goodwill balance at May 19, 2003 was disposed of
as part of the Financial Restructuring described in Note 3.
Amortization of intangibles for fiscal 2005 was £nil (2004,
£6 million and 2003, £44 million). All
intangible assets were disposed of as part of the Financial
Restructuring described in Note 3.
|
|
9. |
Pension plans and other post-retirement plans |
Pension plans
On May 19, 2003 the Company and its then subsidiary,
Marconi Corporation plc, entered into schemes of arrangement as
described in note 3. As a result of this, the pension
schemes are not part of the M (2003) plc Group as at
March 31, 2005. Further, the pension schemes have always
been, and remain, liabilities of the Marconi Group.
Prior to May 19, 2003, the Marconi businesses previously
held by the Group operated defined benefit pension plans in the
UK, US and Europe, and post retirement benefit plans in the US.
The most significant pension plan was the GEC 1972 Plan
(the UK Plan) in the UK, a defined benefit plan.
The assets of the Plan were held separately from the assets of
the Group, were administered by trustees and were managed
professionally.
The benefits offered to specific employees vary based upon the
location of and past business decisions made by a specific
business unit, as well as local statutory requirements. Defined
benefit pension plans, that generally provide benefits to
eligible individuals, after minimum service requirements are
met, are based on years of credit service and average earnings
of the employee. Defined contribution plans, that provide
benefits to eligible employees, are based on the value of
contributions paid into the applicable plan adjusted for
investment returns.
The Company funded its defined benefit pension obligations at a
level, which met or exceeded local legal requirements. Funded
pension plan assets were primarily invested in equity and debt
securities.
F-21
Data with respect to benefit obligations, excluding those
related to discontinued operations is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pension benefits | |
|
Pension benefits | |
|
|
U.K. plans | |
|
Overseas plans | |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
|
£ 000 | |
|
£ 000 | |
|
£ 000 | |
|
£ 000 | |
|
|
| |
Change in benefit obligations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Benefit obligation at beginning of year
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,444,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
245,000 |
|
|
Service cost
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Benefits paid
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,000 |
) |
|
Divestitures
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,447,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(244,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Benefit obligations at end of year
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in plan assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value of plan assets at beginning of year
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,237,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
134,000 |
|
|
Benefits paid
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,000 |
) |
|
Divestitures
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,236,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(133,000 |
) |
Fair value of plan assets at end of year
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amounts recognized in the consolidated balance sheet consist of:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net amount recognized
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At May 19, 2003, the actuarial assumptions used were
unchanged from March 31, 2003. The actuarial assumptions
used to develop the periodic benefit cost and funded status was
as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pension benefits | |
|
Pension benefits | |
|
|
U.K. plans | |
|
Overseas plans | |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
|
% | |
|
% | |
|
% | |
|
% | |
|
% | |
|
% | |
|
|
| |
Weighted average assumptions:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Discount rate for pension Expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.3 |
|
|
|
5.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.7 |
|
|
|
6.7 |
|
|
Discount rate for year end disclosure
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.3 |
|
|
|
5.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.0 |
|
|
|
6.0 |
|
|
Expected return on plan Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.7 |
|
|
|
5.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8.5 |
|
|
|
8.5 |
|
|
Rate of compensation increases
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.5 |
|
|
|
4.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.4 |
|
|
|
4.4 |
|
|
Rate of pension increases
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.5 |
|
|
|
2.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.5 |
|
|
|
0.5 |
|
The table below presents data with respect to net periodic
benefit expense/(income) excluding those related to discontinued
operations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pension benefits | |
|
Pension benefits | |
|
|
U.K. plans | |
|
Overseas plans | |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
|
£ 000 | |
|
£ 000 | |
|
£ 000 | |
|
£ 000 | |
|
£ 000 | |
|
£ 000 | |
|
|
| |
Components of net periodic Benefit Expense/(income):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Service cost
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,000 |
|
|
|
26,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,000 |
|
|
Interest cost
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,000 |
|
|
|
138,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,000 |
|
|
Expected return on plan Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(138,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(13,000 |
) |
|
Amortization of unrecognized transition liability
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net periodic benefit expense of defined benefit plans
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,000 |
|
|
|
29,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,000 |
|
Net curtailment loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,000 |
|
Net periodic benefit expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,000 |
|
|
|
29,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,000 |
|
F-22
At March 31, 2004 the projected benefit obligation,
accumulated benefit obligation, and fair value of plan assets
for pension plans which have an accumulated benefit obligation
in excess of plan assets were £nil (2003,
£2,689 million, £2,618 million, and
£2,371 million respectively).
|
|
|
Other post-retirement benefits |
At March 31, 2005 no active employees and no retired
employees (2004, no active employees and no retired employees;
2003, no active employees and 1,730 retired employees) of
companies in the United States of America and Canada were
entitled to health care benefits after retirement.
All of the other post retirement plans are unfunded. The benefit
cost charges and provisions for the liability are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Post retirement | |
|
|
Benefits | |
|
|
March 31, | |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
|
£ 000 | |
|
£ 000 | |
|
|
| |
Change in benefit obligations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Benefit obligations at beginning of year
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
29,000 |
|
|
Businesses disposed
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(28,000 |
) |
|
Foreign currency exchange rate changes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,000 |
) |
Benefit obligations at end of year
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Funded status
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrecognized net actuarial gain
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrecognized prior service cost
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net accrued benefit cost
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Data with respect to net periodic benefit cost is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Post retirement | |
|
|
benefits March 31, | |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
|
£ 000 | |
|
£ 000 | |
|
£ 000 | |
|
|
| |
Components of net periodic benefit (income)/expense:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest cost
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,000 |
|
|
Amortization of net gain
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,000 |
) |
|
Net curtailment gain
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net periodic benefit income of other post-retirement plans
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Different assumptions were made in relation to the cost of
retiree health care benefits. For the majority of plans, the
assumptions were as follows:
In fiscal 2004 and 2003, an annual rate of increase per capita
in the cost of retiree health care benefits of 12% for 2003
(decreasing gradually over the following years to 6% in 2012)
was assumed for all employees and retirees. The annual rate of
increase in the cost of prescription drugs of 15% in 2003
(decreasing gradually over the following years to 6% in 2012)
was assumed for all employees and retirees.
An increase or decrease of one percentage point in such assumed
rates would have resulted in no change to the benefit obligation
at March 31, 2005 and the service and interest cost
components of the net periodic benefit cost for the year then
ended.
F-23
Defined contribution plans
The former U.S. subsidiaries of the Company operate 401(k)
plans for eligible employees who contribute a percentage of
their pre-tax compensation with the Company matching these
contributions up to prescribed limits. For fiscal 2005, the
matching contributions were £nil (2004,
£1 million and 2003, £7 million).
|
|
10. |
Segment and related information disclosures |
The Companys reportable segments for trading activities
prior to the Financial Restructuring on May 19, 2003 have
been determined based upon the nature of the products and
services that were offered to its customers, which were managed
separately and were comprised of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
The Network Equipment segment developed, manufactured, sold and
supported optical networks, transmission systems and network
management software for customers in the carrier network market.
It also provided to customers in the carrier network market a
broad range of access products. In addition, it supplied
customers in both the carrier and the enterprise network markets
a broad range of high-performance, high-capacity broadband
switches, which select paths for sending large amounts of voice
and data traffic through a network |
|
|
|
The Network Services segment provided a broad range of support
services to the communications industry worldwide tailored to
suit customers needs. It supported both the Companys
products and those of other network equipment manufacturers. |
|
|
|
The Other segment contains the Companys other investments
and businesses not included in other segments. |
Management referred to Network Equipment and Network Services in
aggregate as the Core division and Other as the Capital division.
Segmental performance
Revenues and operating profits are measured on a segmental basis
in accordance with U.K. GAAP for 2003. In 2004 all revenues and
operating profits were analyzed as discontinued operations in
the UK GAAP accounts but have been analyzed consistently with
prior years below. The principal measurement differences between
U.K. GAAP and U.S. GAAP as related to the information
reported on a segmental basis are the result of differences in
the accounting for pensions and post-retirement benefits,
reorganization costs, goodwill and employee share options.
Capital employed is also reported under U.K. GAAP. It is not
practicable to identify the total capital employed of network
equipment and network services separately as the same assets
are, generally, used to generate sales in each of these
segments. The operating results of these segments are separately
reportable.
Management uses the U.K. GAAP operating (loss)/profit before
goodwill and intangible asset amortization, in-process research
and development write-offs, U.K. GAAP exceptional items, gains
and losses on business disposals and the impact of 50% or less
owned affiliates as its measure of segment profitability. In the
tables below, this measure is referred to as segment operating
(loss)/profit.
The following tables present the Companys revenues,
operating (loss)/income before exceptional items, goodwill
amortization and other items, and other financial data from the
Companys reportable segments
F-24
presented in accordance with U.K. GAAP and then reconciled to
U.S. GAAP financial information consolidated totals:
|
|
|
Analysis of reportable segments (U.K. GAAP) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Segment | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
operating | |
|
Capital | |
As of and For the Year Ended |
|
Revenues | |
|
(loss)/profit | |
|
employed(2) | |
March 31, 2005 |
|
£ 000 | |
|
£ 000 | |
|
£ 000 | |
|
|
| |
Network equipment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Network services
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other (including intra activity sales)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(226 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Segment total U.K. GAAP
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(226 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Segment | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
operating | |
|
Capital | |
As of and For the Year Ended |
|
Revenues | |
|
(loss)/profit | |
|
employed(2) | |
March 31, 2004 |
|
£ 000 | |
|
£ 000 | |
|
£ 000 | |
|
|
| |
Network equipment
|
|
|
100,000 |
|
|
|
(28,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Network services
|
|
|
68,000 |
|
|
|
4,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
Other (including intra activity sales)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(14,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Segment total U.K. GAAP
|
|
|
168,000 |
|
|
|
(38,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Segment | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
operating | |
|
Capital | |
As of and For the Year Ended |
|
Revenues | |
|
(loss)/profit | |
|
employed(2) | |
March 31, 2003 |
|
£ 000 | |
|
£ 000 | |
|
£ 000 | |
|
|
| |
Network equipment
|
|
|
1,131,000 |
|
|
|
(259,000 |
) |
|
|
220,000 |
|
Network services
|
|
|
743,000 |
|
|
|
52,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
Capital (net of intra segment revenue of £32)
|
|
|
40,000 |
|
|
|
(107,000 |
) |
|
|
(27,000 |
) |
Discontinued(1)
|
|
|
88,000 |
|
|
|
(2,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Segment total U.K. GAAP
|
|
|
2,002,000 |
|
|
|
(316,000 |
) |
|
|
193,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
For fiscal 2003 discontinued operations relate to mobile. |
|
|
(2) |
Included in capital employed are the following: property, plant
and equipment, inventory, accounts receivable, prepaid expense
and other current assets, other non-current assets, accounts
payable, accrued liabilities, non-current liabilities and other
liabilities. |
F-25
Analysis of revenue by product (U.K. GAAP)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
|
£ 000 | |
|
£000 | |
|
£000 | |
|
|
| |
Network Equipment:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Optical Networks
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
35,000 |
|
|
|
439,000 |
|
BBRS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,000 |
|
|
|
142,000 |
|
European Access
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19,000 |
|
|
|
258,000 |
|
North American Access
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,000 |
|
|
|
95,000 |
|
Outside Plant & Power
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18,000 |
|
|
|
140,000 |
|
Other Network Equipment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,000 |
|
|
|
57,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100,000 |
|
|
|
1,131,000 |
|
Network Services:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
IC&M
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
35,000 |
|
|
|
370,000 |
|
VAS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
33,000 |
|
|
|
373,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
68,000 |
|
|
|
743,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Network Equipment and Network Services revenues
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
168,000 |
|
|
|
1,874,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total capital revenue
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
40,000 |
|
Total discontinued
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
88,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
168,000 |
|
|
|
2,002,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reconciliation of U.K. GAAP segmental information to
U.S. GAAP |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
|
£ 000 | |
|
£ 000 | |
|
£ 000 | |
|
|
| |
Revenue in accordance with U.K. GAAP
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
168,000 |
|
|
|
2,002,000 |
|
Discontinued operations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mobile
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(106,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue in accordance with U.S. GAAP
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
168,000 |
|
|
|
1,896,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-26
Operating (loss)/income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
|
£ 000 | |
|
£ 000 | |
|
£ 000 | |
|
|
| |
Segmental operating loss per U.K. GAAP
|
|
|
(226 |
) |
|
|
(38,000 |
) |
|
|
(316,000 |
) |
|
Amortization expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(13,000 |
) |
|
|
(104,000 |
) |
|
Share of associates operating loss)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(89,000 |
) |
|
Operating exceptional items
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,000 |
) |
|
|
(358,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.K. GAAP operating loss
|
|
|
(226 |
) |
|
|
(53,000 |
) |
|
|
(867,000 |
) |
|
Joint ventures and associates operating loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
129,000 |
|
|
U.K. GAAP operating loss of discontinued operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
70,000 |
|
U.S. GAAP adjustments:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Share option plans
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(9,000 |
) |
|
|
(14,000 |
) |
|
Pension and other post-retirement benefits
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,000 |
) |
|
|
11,000 |
|
|
Goodwill and intangible asset amortization and impairment Charges
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,000 |
|
|
|
37,000 |
|
|
Gain on disposal of businesses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,000 |
|
|
Restructuring costs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18,000 |
|
|
Other
|
|
|
(1,108 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. GAAP operating income/(loss)
|
|
|
(1,334 |
) |
|
|
(58,000 |
) |
|
|
(608,000 |
) |
|
Loss on investments, net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(45,000 |
) |
|
Gain on financial restructuring
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,183,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gain on settlement of equity forward contracts
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
123,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
34,000 |
|
|
Interest income
|
|
|
411 |
|
|
|
29,000 |
|
|
|
45,000 |
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(329,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. GAAP income/(loss) from continuing operations before
income taxes, minority interests and cumulative effects of
changes in accounting principles
|
|
|
(923 |
) |
|
|
2,277,000 |
|
|
|
(903,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital employed/total assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
|
£ 000 | |
|
£ 000 | |
|
|
| |
Total U.K. GAAP segment capital employed
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.K. GAAP capital employed
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. GAAP adjustments:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provisions for restructuring not included in U.S. GAAP
capital employed
|
|
|
7,852 |
|
|
|
8,960 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total U.S. GAAP assets
|
|
|
7,852 |
|
|
|
8,960 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.K. U.S. GAAP adjustments |
The following describes the significant U.K. GAAP to
U.S. GAAP adjustments as they relate to segment information.
|
|
|
|
|
Pension and other post-retirement benefits |
Under both U.K. GAAP and U.S. GAAP pension costs are
provided for so as to provide for future pension liabilities.
However, there are differences in the prescribed methods of
valuation, which give rise to GAAP adjustments to the pension
cost and obligation or prepayment. Furthermore, under U.K. GAAP
the notional interest cost associated with the pension and
post-retirement benefit obligation is classified as interest
expense, whereas under U.S. GAAP it is classified with
employee costs.
F-27
Under U.S. GAAP, the carrying amounts of certain hedged
items are adjusted for gains or losses attributable to the
hedged risk. This unrealized gain is offset by changes in the
fair value of the derivative. Additionally, on the sale or early
termination of the hedged items, gains and losses are
immediately reclassified to other (income)/expense. Under U.K.
GAAP, these gains and losses are amortized until the date of
termination.
|
|
|
Revenue by geography (U.S. GAAP) |
Revenue to unaffiliated customers by geographic region is as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended March 31, | |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
|
£ 000 | |
|
£ 000 | |
|
£ 000 | |
|
|
| |
Revenue by territory of destination:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
United Kingdom
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
42,000 |
|
|
|
500,000 |
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
58,000 |
|
|
|
668,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Europe, Middle East, Africa (EMEA)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100,000 |
|
|
|
1,168,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
United States
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
50,000 |
|
|
|
519,000 |
|
Central and Latin America (CALA)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,000 |
|
|
|
62,000 |
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total the Americas
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
55,000 |
|
|
|
596,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asia Pacific (APAC)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,000 |
|
|
|
132,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total external revenue
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
168,000 |
|
|
|
1,896,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended March 31, | |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
|
£000 | |
|
£000 | |
|
£000 | |
|
|
| |
Revenue by territory of origin:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
United Kingdom
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
58,000 |
|
|
|
692,000 |
|
Italy
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19,000 |
|
|
|
230,000 |
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21,000 |
|
|
|
219,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Europe, Middle East, Africa (EMEA)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
98,000 |
|
|
|
1,141,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
United States
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
58,000 |
|
|
|
534,000 |
|
Central and Latin America (CALA)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,000 |
|
|
|
57,000 |
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total the Americas
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
62,000 |
|
|
|
609,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asia Pacific (APAC)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,000 |
|
|
|
146,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total external revenue
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
168,000 |
|
|
|
1,896,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
No other individual country contributed more than 10% of revenue
in any of the years reported.
F-28
Revenue by product (U.S. GAAP)
Revenue by product is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended March 31, | |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
|
£000 | |
|
£000 | |
|
£000 | |
|
|
| |
|
Optical networks
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
35,000 |
|
|
|
439,000 |
|
|
Access systems
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
50,000 |
|
|
|
493,000 |
|
|
Broadband routing and switching
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,000 |
|
|
|
142,000 |
|
|
Other network equipment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,000 |
|
|
|
57,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Network Equipment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100,000 |
|
|
|
1,131,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Value-added services
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
33,000 |
|
|
|
373,000 |
|
|
Installation, commissioning and maintenance
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
35,000 |
|
|
|
370,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Network Services
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
68,000 |
|
|
|
743,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Core revenues
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
168,000 |
|
|
|
1,874,000 |
|
Capital businesses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total external revenue
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
168,000 |
|
|
|
1,896,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Within capital employed, the balance sheet measure reviewed by
the chief operating decision maker, the only long-lived assets
included are property, plant and equipment and other non-current
assets.
Expenditure by sector on property, plant and equipment is as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended March 31, | |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
|
£000 | |
|
£000 | |
|
£000 | |
|
|
| |
Network Equipment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
34,000 |
|
Network Services
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
35,000 |
|
Discontinued operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
43,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The geographical split of property, plant and equipment and
goodwill and intangibles is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended March 31, | |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
|
£000 | |
|
£000 | |
|
£000 | |
|
|
| |
United Kingdom
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
567,000 |
|
United States
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
249,000 |
|
Italy
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
48,000 |
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
157,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,021,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-lived assets within other countries are not individually
material for any fiscal year presented.
F-29
11. Commitments and contingencies
Legal proceedings
Under the M (2003) plc scheme of arrangement, any and
all legal claims against M (2003) plc as at
March 27, 2003, whether liquidated or unliquidated, or
actual or contingent, were compromised. Therefore, there are no
circumstances under which any of these claims will result in
liability for M (2003) plc. Certain of these claims,
however, may result in payments by the M (2003) plc
scheme of arrangement. Where such a claim is pending or
threatened and may have or has had in the recent past, including
at least the 12 months immediately preceding the date of
this prospectus, a significant effect on the financial position
of the scheme as a whole, this is set out below. Where a
liquidated sum is claimed, a de minimis figure of
£5 million has been applied in determining which
claims may have a significant effect. The figures given are the
full amounts claimed by the claimants in each case, which may be
much greater than the amounts the claimants realistically
believe they can recover. We and our other former group
companies intend to defend claims vigorously. While we believe
that we have meritorious defenses, the duration and outcome of
the litigation are not predictable at this point.
The following represents the largest recent or outstanding
claims made against us:
|
|
|
|
|
Marconi Corporation plc, M (2003) plc, Marconi Inc.
and Marconi Data Systems Inc. are defendants in an action
brought by a former employee, Thomas Edeus, or Edeus. The
complaint asserts three causes of action; firstly that Edeus was
unlawfully deprived of benefits to which he was entitled under
Marconi Data Systems Incs United States severance plan;
secondly for failure to provide Edeus with a summary plan
description relating to the severance plan; and thirdly for age
discrimination in employment. The plaintiff has purported to
have made out claims in various specified amounts totaling over
U.S.$901,000, some of which may be in the alternative, and also
unspecified punitive damages, liquidated damages and front and
back pay, making the impact of this claim on us and the former
group difficult to assess. An answer and affirmative defenses
have been filed on behalf of all defendants. On June 5,
2003, the court entered an order providing as follows:
Plaintiff having advised the court that one or more
defendants [sic] are in Bankruptcy, this action is placed
on the courts [suspense] calendar pending disposition of
the bankruptcy case. Plaintiff is directed to file a notice for
hearing a motion to reinstate upon disposition of the bankruptcy
proceedings. Potential liabilities in respect of the claim
against Marconi Corporation plc and M (2003) plc were
compromised pursuant to our restructuring. |
|
|
|
In April 2002, 11 former employees of Ten Square Inc. brought a
claim against directors of their company for fraud in reducing
their compensation package before liquidating the company and
restarting it under a different name. The claim was for
$2,160,050.91, plus $1 million in punitive damages for all
plaintiffs (it is unclear if this was for each of the plaintiffs
or in total). The plaintiffs alleged that M (2003) plc
was a director of Ten Square Inc. although in fact
M (2003) plc only had a right to appoint a director, a
right M (2003) plc had not recently exercised. Marconi
Ventures was also named as a plaintiff on September 9,
2002. The plaintiffs did not serve proceedings upon
M (2003) plc and on October 24, 2002 an order for
the dismissal of the claim against M (2003) plc was
entered. However, M (2003) plc was named in the second
amended complaint which was filed on December 24, 2002.
M (2003) plc is aware of the action but has not served
and is not yet a party to it. Potential liabilities in respect
of the claim against M (2003) plc have been
compromised pursuant to the M (2003) plc scheme of
arrangement. |
We are not and have not been engaged in, nor, so far as we are
aware, do we have pending or threatened by or against us, any
legal or arbitration proceedings which may have or have had in
period since March 27, 2003, a significant effect on our
financial position as a whole.
F-30
Purchase commitments
In the ordinary course of business the Company entered into
contracts for capital expenditures as set out below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital expenditure commitments | |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
|
£000 | |
|
£000 | |
|
£000 | |
|
|
| |
At March 31
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Leases
The Company leases certain facilities and equipment under
operating leases, many of which contain renewal options and
escalation clauses. Total rental expense for fiscal 2005 was
£nil (2004, £nil and 2003, £34 million).
At March 31, 2005, minimum future rental commitments under
operating leases having non-cancelable lease terms in excess of
one year are £nil (2004, £nil, 2003,
£34 million)
14. Investments in affiliates
Fiscal 2004
All investments in affiliates were disposed of as a result of
the Financial Restructuring on May 19, 2003, as described
in note 3.
Fiscal 2003
At March 31, 2003, the Company had two investments, which
it accounted for using the equity method, Easynet Group plc
(Easynet) and Confirmant. At March 31, 2002 Ultramast was
also accounted for using the equity method.
In February 2003, the Company completed the disposition of
Ultramast through a capital reduction and settled all litigation
associated with Ultramast. As a result, the Company acquired an
additional 1.3 million ordinary shares in Easynet, which
increased its equity holding to 72.7% and its holding of voting
shares to 51.6%. Under the Articles of Association of Easynet
and the Companys Relationship Agreement with
Easynet, the Companys voting rights were limited to 49.9%.
Accordingly, despite ownership of a majority-voting shareholder,
the Company determined that it did not control Easynet in the
period and the Company continued to account for its investment
in Easynet using the equity method of accounting. In addition to
the Easynet shares, the Company also received cash proceeds of
£41 million reflecting a gain on disposal of
£14 million.
Summarized financial information for investment in affiliates
is as follows:
There are no assets or liabilities as at March 31, 2005 or
March 31, 2004.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, | |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
|
£000 | |
|
£000 | |
|
£000 | |
|
|
| |
Statement of operations data
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
89 |
|
Operating (loss)/income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(74 |
) |
Net (loss)/income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(81 |
) |
F-31
15. Investment in securities
During fiscal 2005, an impairment charge of £nil (2004,
£nil, and 2003, £38 million) was recorded in the
statement of operations related to declines in value of equity
securities judged to be other than temporary.
On May 19, 2003 the investment in securities were disposed
of as part of the Financial Restructuring described in
note 3. There were no equity securities as at
March 31, 2005 or March 31, 2004.
16. Shareholders equity
Holders of ordinary shares in the Company are entitled to one
vote per share on matters to be voted on by the shareholders,
and to receive dividends when and as declared by the board.
Shareholders are not entitled to pre-emptive rights and have no
subscription, redemption or conversion privileges. The ordinary
shares do not have cumulative voting rights. The rights,
preferences and privileges of holders of ordinary shares are
subject to the rights of the holders of shares of any series of
preferred shares issued or that may be issued in the future.
17. Employee stock option plans
Prior to the Financial Restructuring the Company accounted for
employee stock option plans under APB 25 and had nine plans
under which it granted options: the GEC Employee 1992
Savings-Related Share Option Plan, the GEC 1984 Managers
Share Option Plan, the GEC 1997 Executive Share Option Plan, the
Marconi 1999 Stock Option Plan, the Marconi U.K. Sharesave Plan,
the Marconi International Sharesave Plan, the Marconi Launch
Share Plan, the Marconi Long Term Incentive Plan and the Marconi
Phantom Option Plan. In addition, during fiscal 2002, the
Company granted options in its ADRs under the Marconi
Employee Stock Purchase Plan for the Companys employees in
North America.
As of March 31, 2003, the Company had granted options under
the following eight plans in respect of the acquisitions of
Reltec, Mariposa, MSI and Northwood Technologies: the 1998
Equity Participation Plan of Reltec Corporation, the amended and
restated 1995 Stock Purchase and Option Plan for employees of
Reltec Holdings Inc., and subsidiaries, the MSI 1995 Stock
Option Plan, the MSI 1999 Stock Option Plan, the MSIH Stock
Option Plan, the Mariposa Technology, Inc. 1998 Employee
Incentive Plan and the Marconi Restricted Share Plan.
Under the terms of the stock option plans, employees have been
granted rights to purchase ordinary shares and/or phantom
options. The terms of the grant vary and each of the main plans
is described below.
At the date of the Financial Restructuring, options outstanding
under the majority of plans lapsed as the employees were no
longer employed by a group company. For the remaining share
options issued under variable plans, the compensation cost has
been re-measured on the basis of a £nil value of
M (2003) plc stock at March 31, 2004 because the
Companys shares were delisted as part of the
restructuring. The full expense has been recognized in the
current year rather than over the vesting period as the options
are not expected to hold any future value.
Plans under which options were still outstanding in respect
of the Companys ordinary shares at March 31, 2005:
Non-savings related plans
The Marconi Launch Share Plan
Under this plan, employees at November 30, 1999 were, at
the discretion of the board, granted the right to receive up to
1,000 Company ordinary shares, which would be exercisable
provided that two conditions are met. The first condition is
that the market price of a Company ordinary share must have
doubled from 801.5p to £16.03 during the period between
November 30, 1999 and November 30, 2004. The second
condition is that a participant must normally remain in
employment until November 30, 2002 or, if later, at the
time that the first condition is met. The Company applied
variable plan accounting for grants under this plan and would
F-32
have accounted for the compensation expense if the first
condition had been met. At March 31, 2004, 19,589,228
Company shares were outstanding to be purchased under the plan.
Metapath
Software Corporation Amended and Restated 1995 Stock Option
Plan, the Metapath Software International, Inc. Amended and
Restated 1999 Stock Option Plan, and the Mobile Systems
International Holdings Limited Share Option Plan.
Each of these option plans had been in place over MSI shares
prior to the acquisition by the Company in June 2000. Following
the acquisition, MSI option holders who would become employees
of the Company exchanged options over MSI shares for options
over Marconi plc shares. Following the exchange the option
holder was kept in the same economic position as before the
exchange through an adjustment to the exercise price and an
increase in the number of shares under option. The option holder
was given a choice to retain their options with their existing
vesting schedule, or to elect to accept an amended vesting
schedule (vesting one third of their options on each of the
first, second and third anniversaries of the acquisition)
together with an award of restricted stock over the same number
of shares as they had shares under option. Compensation expense
was recognized on the shares that were unvested at the
acquisition date (based on the intrinsic value of the shares as
of the acquisition date) over the vesting period. The fair value
of all shares issued at the date of acquisition, less the amount
allocated to compensation expense, has been recorded as a cost
of the acquisition. Certain arrangements under the Marconi
Restricted Share Plan, the Marconi 1999 Stock Option Plan, the
MSI 1995 Plan and the MSIH Plan were modified subsequent to
acquisition. As a result, the modified arrangements became
subject to variable accounting.
At March 31, 2004, 2,530,225 Company shares were
outstanding. For fiscal 2004, a charge of approximately
£2 million has been recorded related to these plans to
recognize in full the remaining compensation cost relating to
the outstanding shares.
Mariposa
Technology, Inc. 1998 Employee Incentive Plan
Prior to the acquisition by the Company in October 2000, options
had been granted under The Mariposa Technology, Inc. 1998
Employee Incentive Plan over Mariposa Technology, Inc. shares.
Following the acquisition, option holders who would become
employees of the Company exchanged options over Mariposa
Technology, Inc, shares for options over Company shares.
Following the exchange the option holder was kept in the same
economic position as before the exchange through an adjustment
to the exercise price and an increase in the number of shares
under option. Compensation expense was recognized on the shares
that were unvested at the acquisition date (based on the
intrinsic value of the shares as of the acquisition date) over
the vesting period. The fair value of all shares issued at the
date of acquisition, less the amount allocated to compensation
expense, has been recorded as a cost of the acquisition.
At March 31, 2004, 320,684 Company shares were outstanding.
For fiscal 2004, a charge of approximately £7 million
has been recorded related to these plans to recognize in full
the remaining compensation cost relating to the outstanding
shares.
The
Marconi Long Term Incentive Plan
Under the long term incentive plan (LTIP), participants could be
granted performance-related awards entitling them, at the end of
a three-year period, to be granted a right to call for a number
of ordinary shares of the Company without payment based on
corporate performance of the business in which they worked and
of the Company as a whole over that period. The annual award was
limited to a maximum value of 50% of base salary. Any right so
granted would normally become exercisable in three equal
tranches. The first tranche would become exercisable
immediately, and the second and third tranches would normally
become exercisable on the first and second anniversaries of the
date of grant. All full-time employees of the Company, directors
of the Company and executive directors of the Company were
eligible to participate in the long-term incentive plan, at the
discretion of the remuneration committee of the board of
directors of the Company. No newly issued shares could be used
to satisfy options under this plan. The Company applied variable
plan accounting for grants under this plan and recognized
compensation cost when achievement of
F-33
the performance conditions became probable. No new shares were
granted during the year and no charges were recorded. At
March 31, 2003, 617,963 Company shares were outstanding.
Additional plans at March 31, 2003:
Savings related plans
|
|
|
The Marconi U.K. Sharesave Plan |
All employees of participating U.K. companies including
full-time executive directors were eligible to participate in
the U.K. sharesave plan. Under this plan, participants were
granted options to purchase shares with an exercise price not
less than 80% of the market value of a Company ordinary share on
the trading day immediately before the invitation day (as
defined in the rules of the plan). In order to participate, each
employee must have entered into a savings contract with a
specified financial institution under which they agreed to make
monthly contributions, not exceeding £250 per month in
aggregate. The savings contracts typically expired on the third
or fifth anniversary of the date of grant. The plan was
compensatory and compensation expense was recorded over the
vesting period.
At May 19, 2003, the outstanding options lapsed due to the
Financial Restructuring as a result of which the participants
were no longer employees of the Company.
|
|
|
The Marconi International Sharesave Plan |
The international sharesave plan, at the discretion of the board
of directors of Marconi plc permitted employees of the Company
who were resident outside the U.K. to participate in a share
option plan that was substantially similar to the U.K. sharesave
plan. Unlike the U.K. sharesave plan, under the international
sharesave plan the savings contracts could not generate the
exact amount required to exercise the options because of
currency fluctuations and interest rate differences. Additional
cash may have been required when the options were exercised,
however, any excess savings generated could not be used to
purchase additional shares.
At May 19, 2003, the outstanding options lapsed due to the
Financial Restructuring as a result of which the participants
were no longer employees of the Company.
|
|
|
The Marconi International Sharesave Plan Italian
Appendix |
All employees and executive directors whose remuneration was
subject to taxation in Italy were eligible to participate in the
Italian Appendix of the International Sharesave Plan. Under the
Italian Appendix of the International Sharesave Plan,
participants could exercise options to purchase shares with an
exercise price not less than the market value of a Company
ordinary share averaged over the 30 trading days
immediately before the date of grant. Upon exercise,
participants would be gifted such number of additional shares as
could be purchased on the market with 10% of their total
accumulated savings and interest. In order to participate, each
employee must have entered into a savings contract with a
specified financial institution under which they agreed to make
monthly contributions, not exceeding the Italian Lira/ Euro
equivalent of £250 per month in aggregate.
At May 19, 2003, the outstanding options lapsed due to the
Financial Restructuring as a result of which the participants
were no longer employees of the Company.
|
|
|
The Marconi Employee Stock Purchase Plan for Employees in
North America |
All employees of participating U.S. and Canadian companies were
eligible to participate in the Stock Purchase Plan. Employees
could purchase shares with after-tax payroll deductions at the
end of an Offering Period, at a price not less than 85% of the
lower of the closing price of a share on the Offering Date and
the closing price of a share on the Purchase Date (as defined in
the rules of the Plan). No employee could purchase shares
pursuant to the Stock Purchase Plan at a rate, which exceeded
U.S.$25,000 in any calendar
F-34
year or such lower limit as the Company specified from time to
time. This plan was non-compensatory in nature.
At May 19, 2003, the outstanding options lapsed due to the
Financial Restructuring as a result of which the participants
were no longer employees of the Company.
|
|
|
Non-savings related plans |
|
|
|
The Marconi 1999 Share Option Plan |
All employees and full-time executive directors were eligible to
be granted options under the option plan at the discretion of
the remuneration committee. Options granted prior to July 2001
to participants were not normally exercisable unless our
earnings per share over a period of at least three financial
years exceeded the growth in the U.K. Retail Price Index by at
least an average of 3% per year. Options granted after July
2001 became exercisable over periods and subject to conditions
defined by the remuneration committee. Options granted under the
plan in November 2001 became progressively exercisable over four
years and were subject to conditions related to reduction in the
Companys consolidated net debt and the Companys
total shareholder return being better than that of the company
at the fiftieth percentile of FTSE 100 companies. Options
entitled the option holder to acquire Company ordinary shares at
a price per share determined by the remuneration committee, not
less than the market value of a Company share shortly before the
date of grant.
The Company applied variable plan accounting for grants under
this scheme and recognized compensation cost if achievement of
the performance conditions became probable.
At May 19, 2003, the outstanding options lapsed due to the
Financial Restructuring as a result of which the participants
were no longer employees of the Company.
|
|
|
The Marconi Phantom Option Plan |
In June 1999, the GEC remuneration committee adopted the phantom
option plan for the purpose of granting incentives relating to
any increase in our value primarily to executives and employees
of Reltec and Fore Systems following our acquisition of those
businesses. From November 1999, the Company operated the phantom
option plan and made awards by reference to Company shares and
previous awards (grants made between June 1999 and November 1999
in relation to GEC Shares) were adjusted so that they related to
Company shares on a value-for-value basis. Following the
adjustment the holder of a phantom unit was kept in the same
economic position as before through an adjustment to the
exercise price and an increase in the number of units. A phantom
option is similar to a share option except that it is a
cash-based award granted in relation to a stated number of
phantom units, each of which has the same economic value as a
Company ordinary share. Upon exercise of a phantom option, the
holder was entitled to receive a cash payment equal to the
difference between the base price of the phantom option
(normally corresponding to the market value of a Company
ordinary share at the time the phantom option was granted) and
market value of a Company ordinary share on the date of
exercise. The Company may give notice to participants that it
elects to substitute options to acquire real Company ordinary
shares for phantom options. If such an election is made, a
participant would be required on exercise to pay an amount equal
to the base price of the phantom options to the Company and
would receive Company ordinary shares. Options were normally
exercisable between the third and tenth anniversaries of grant.
The Company recognized compensation expense measured at the end
of each period as the amount by which the quoted market value of
a Company share exceeded the unit price payable by the unit
holder. The expense was recognized over the service period.
Changes, either increases or decreases, in the quoted market
value of the shares between the date of grant and the date the
phantom options were exercised result in a change in the
compensation expense to be recognized.
Where the phantom options were granted in exchange for Reltec
and Fore Systems options as part of those business
combinations, the fair value of those options was treated as
part of the respective purchase prices.
At May 19, 2003, the outstanding options lapsed due to the
Financial Restructuring as a result of which the participants
were no longer employees of the Company.
F-35
|
|
|
Marconi Restricted Share Plan |
The Restricted Share Plan was introduced to enable the Company
to award share based incentives to employees of companies which
the Company acquired. The Remuneration Committee had discretion
to make awards of restricted stock, which entitled the employee
to call for shares at £nil cost once the stock had vested.
The stock vested either at certain specified times or subject to
the satisfaction of performance conditions. In practice the
performance conditions imposed generally related to specific
integration targets or business goals of the acquired company.
Once the restrictions had ended or the conditions had been met,
the restricted share vested and would either be automatically
released (in the case of U.S. employees) or could be called
for by the employee (in all other jurisdictions). The Company
applied variable plan accounting for grants under this plan, and
compensation expense was recorded over the vesting period.
At May 19, 2003, the outstanding options lapsed due to the
Financial Restructuring as a result of which the participants
were no longer employees of the Company.
|
|
|
The Marconi Associated Companies Share Option Plan |
The associated companies option plan enabled options to be
granted to executives of companies in which the Company had a
direct or indirect equity interest of between 20% and 50%. The
terms of the associated companies option plan were substantially
similar to the Marconi 1999 Share Option Plan. No options
were granted under this plan.
|
|
|
Existing GEC share option plans |
Options plans similar to the Marconi 1999 Stock Option Plan and
the Marconi U.K. Sharesave Plan had been in place over GEC
shares. There was a non-compensatory plan known as the 1992
Savings-Related Scheme. There was a fixed plan known as the 1984
Managers Scheme (1984 Scheme). There was a variable plan
known as the 1997 Executive Scheme (1997 Scheme). During fiscal
2000, option holders who would remain employees of the Company
were able to exchange options over GEC shares for options over
Company shares. Following the exchange the option holder was
kept in the same economic position after the exchange as before
the exchange through an adjustment to the exercise price and an
increase in the number of shares under option. The exchange
resulted in no change in measurement date for either the 1992
Savings-Related Scheme or the 1984 Scheme. As performance
conditions in respect of the 1997 Scheme ceased to apply, the
measurement date for this option plan occurred. These
performance conditions were the achievement of earnings per
share targets and a vesting period. Option holders in the three
plans who would not remain employees of the Company were able to
exercise their options.
At May 19, 2003, the outstanding options lapsed due to the
Financial Restructuring as a result of which the participants
were no longer employees of the Company.
|
|
|
The 1998 Equity Participation Plan of Reltec Corporation, the
Amended and Restated 1995 Stock Purchase and Option Plan for
Employees of Reltec Holdings, Inc. and Subsidiaries |
|
|
|
The Northwood Technologies Inc. Stock Option Plan |
Prior to the acquisition by the Company in October 2002,
Northwood Technologies Inc. (Northwood) granted options under
the Northwood Technologies Inc. stock option plan over Northwood
shares. Following the acquisition by the Company, option holders
who would become employees of the Company exchanged options over
Northwood shares for options over 70,536 Company shares.
Following the exchange, the option-holder was kept in the same
economic position as before the exchange through an adjustment
to the exercise price and an increase in the number of shares
under option. Compensation expense was recognized on the shares
that were unvested at the acquisition date (based on the
intrinsic value of the shares as of the acquisition date) over
the vesting period. The fair value of all share issued at the
date of acquisition, less the amount allocated to compensation
expense, was recorded as a cost of the acquisition.
At May 19, 2003, the outstanding options lapsed due to the
Financial Restructuring as a result of which the participants
were no longer employees of the Company.
F-36
Option activity under the non-savings related plans is as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted | |
|
|
|
|
average | |
|
|
Number of | |
|
exercise | |
|
|
shares | |
|
price | |
|
|
| |
Outstanding March 31, 2003
|
|
|
197,121,951 |
|
|
|
3.24 |
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lapsed
|
|
|
(174,063,851 |
) |
|
|
3.61 |
|
|
Exercised
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding March 31, 2004
|
|
|
23,058,100 |
|
|
|
0.43 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lapsed
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercised
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding March 31, 2005
|
|
|
23,058,100 |
|
|
|
0.43 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All options were granted with an exercise price equal to the
market value of shares as of date of grant, with the exception
of those granted for acquisitions and the LTIP as noted above.
Of the total number of non-savings related options outstanding
at March 31, 2005, none are expected to be exercised as the
Companys shares were delisted as part of the Financial
Restructuring and there are no circumstances under which any
value will be attributed to these share options. All options are
considered to be anti-dilutive.
Additional information regarding all options outstanding as of
March 31, 2005 is noted in the table below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total options | |
|
|
Total options outstanding | |
|
exercisable | |
|
|
|
|
Weighted average | |
|
Weighted | |
|
|
|
Weighted | |
Range of |
|
Total | |
|
remaining | |
|
average | |
|
|
|
average | |
exercise |
|
number | |
|
contractual life | |
|
exercise | |
|
Number | |
|
exercise | |
prices (£) |
|
outstanding | |
|
(years) | |
|
price (£) | |
|
exercisable | |
|
price (£) | |
|
|
| |
Nil
|
|
|
20,207,191 |
|
|
|
2.59 |
|
|
|
nil |
|
|
|
617,963 |
|
|
|
nil |
|
0.03 0.2
|
|
|
66,715 |
|
|
|
2.54 |
|
|
|
0.19 |
|
|
|
66,715 |
|
|
|
0.19 |
|
0.35 0.8
|
|
|
324,118 |
|
|
|
5.71 |
|
|
|
0.56 |
|
|
|
324,118 |
|
|
|
0.56 |
|
1.22 2.66
|
|
|
1,708,105 |
|
|
|
5.21 |
|
|
|
2.12 |
|
|
|
1,708,105 |
|
|
|
2.12 |
|
2.73 4.72
|
|
|
63,367 |
|
|
|
4.61 |
|
|
|
2.91 |
|
|
|
63,367 |
|
|
|
2.91 |
|
6.85 9.57
|
|
|
688,604 |
|
|
|
5.89 |
|
|
|
8.73 |
|
|
|
688,604 |
|
|
|
8.73 |
|
nil 9.57
|
|
|
23,058,100 |
|
|
|
2.93 |
|
|
|
0.43 |
|
|
|
2,850,909 |
|
|
|
3.51 |
|
18. Fair values of financial instruments
The carrying amounts and fair values of material financial
instruments at March 31, 2005, and 2004 were £nil.
The following methods and assumptions were used in estimating
the fair values of financial instruments:
At March 31, 2003 the carrying value and fair value of the
equity forward contracts was £158 million. As a result
of the Financial Restructuring, which was concluded on
May 19, 2003, an agreement was reached and these equity
forward contracts were settled for £35 million. See
note 2, Summary of significant accounting policies, for
further discussion of these equity forward contracts.
F-37
19. Valuation and qualifying accounts
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net effect of | |
|
Effect of | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, | |
|
Additions/ | |
|
acquisitions | |
|
exchange rate | |
|
|
|
March 31, | |
|
|
2004 | |
|
(release) | |
|
less disposals | |
|
changes | |
|
Utilization | |
|
2005 | |
Description |
|
£ | |
|
£ | |
|
£ | |
|
£ | |
|
£ | |
|
£ | |
|
|
| |
Allowance for doubtful accounts
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Warranty reserve*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net effect of | |
|
Effect of | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, | |
|
Additions/ | |
|
acquisitions | |
|
exchange rate | |
|
|
|
March 31, | |
|
|
2003 | |
|
(release) | |
|
less disposals | |
|
changes | |
|
Utilization | |
|
2004 | |
Description |
|
£ | |
|
£ | |
|
£ | |
|
£ | |
|
£ | |
|
£ | |
|
|
| |
Allowance for doubtful accounts
|
|
|
78,000 |
|
|
|
(2,000 |
) |
|
|
(76,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Warranty reserve*
|
|
|
43,000 |
|
|
|
2,000 |
|
|
|
(43,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
121,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(119,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effect of | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, | |
|
Additions/ | |
|
exchange rate | |
|
|
|
March 31, | |
|
|
2002 | |
|
(release) | |
|
changes | |
|
Utilization | |
|
2003 | |
Description |
|
£ | |
|
£ | |
|
£ | |
|
£ | |
|
£ | |
|
|
| |
Allowance for doubtful accounts
|
|
|
167,000 |
|
|
|
(10,000 |
) |
|
|
(7,000 |
) |
|
|
(72,000 |
) |
|
|
78,000 |
|
Warranty reserve*
|
|
|
29,000 |
|
|
|
49,000 |
(1) |
|
|
(1,000 |
) |
|
|
(34,000 |
) |
|
|
43,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
196,000 |
|
|
|
39,000 |
|
|
|
(8,000 |
) |
|
|
(106,000 |
) |
|
|
121,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
The addition of £49 million in fiscal 2003 includes a
£12 million change in liability in respect of the
estimated pre-existing warranties at April 1, 2002. |
In light of the declining market and economic trends the Company
was experiencing, a provision against bad and doubtful debts of
£150 million was charged during fiscal 2002. Of this
amount, £10 million was reassessed and released to the
profit and loss account in fiscal 2003.
F-38
20. Earnings per share
The following table reconciles net (loss)/income available for
ordinary shareholders and the weighted average ordinary shares
outstanding for basic and diluted earnings per ordinary share
for the periods:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, | |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
|
£000 | |
|
£000 | |
|
£000 | |
|
|
| |
Net (loss)/income
|
|
|
(1,108 |
) |
|
|
2,276,000 |
|
|
|
(807,000 |
) |
Basic (loss)/earnings per ordinary share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average ordinary shares outstanding
|
|
|
2,793.0 |
|
|
|
2,793.0 |
|
|
|
2,792.6 |
|
|
Basic (loss)/earnings per ordinary share
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.92 |
|
|
|
(0.29 |
) |
Diluted (loss)/earnings per ordinary share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average ordinary shares outstanding
|
|
|
2,793.0 |
|
|
|
2,793.0 |
|
|
|
2,792.6 |
|
|
Effect of dilutive options
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,793.0 |
|
|
|
2,793.0 |
|
|
|
2,792.6 |
|
|
Diluted (loss)/earnings per ordinary share
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.92 |
|
|
|
(0.29 |
) |
For the fiscal years ended March 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003,
the effect of share options is anti-dilutive and has therefore
been excluded from the calculation of diluted weighted average
number of shares.
21. Income taxes
The geographic analysis of income /(loss) from continuing
operations before income taxes, minority interests and
cumulative changes in accounting principles is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, | |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
|
£000 | |
|
£000 | |
|
£000 | |
|
|
| |
United Kingdom
|
|
|
(923 |
) |
|
|
2,304,000 |
|
|
|
(673,000 |
) |
Non-United Kingdom
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(27,000 |
) |
|
|
(230,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
(923 |
) |
|
|
2,277,000 |
|
|
|
(903,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income tax benefit/(provision) includes:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, | |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
|
£000 | |
|
£000 | |
|
£000 | |
|
|
| |
Current income taxes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
United Kingdom
|
|
|
(185 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
155,000 |
|
|
Non-United Kingdom
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,000 |
) |
|
|
32,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current taxes
|
|
|
(185 |
) |
|
|
(1,000 |
) |
|
|
187,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred income taxes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
United Kingdom
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
29,000 |
|
|
Non-United Kingdom
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total deferred taxes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total income taxes
|
|
|
(185 |
) |
|
|
(1,000 |
) |
|
|
209,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-39
The differences between the Companys tax on profit on
ordinary activities, and the statutory income tax rate in the
United Kingdom are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, | |
|
|
2005 | |
|
2004 | |
|
2003 | |
|
|
£000 | |
|
£000 | |
|
£000 | |
|
|
| |
Taxes computed at the statutory rate: (30% 2005, 2004 and 2003)
|
|
|
(277 |
) |
|
|
683,000 |
|
|
|
(271 |
) |
Non-deductible intangible amortization and impairment charge
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-U.K. tax rate differences
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(9 |
) |
Non-deductible/(non-taxable) items
|
|
|
462 |
|
|
|
(682,000 |
) |
|
|
(30 |
) |
Changes in reinvestment position
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Valuation allowances on losses and other assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
38 |
|
Other, net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income tax (benefit)/provision
|
|
|
185 |
|
|
|
1,000 |
|
|
|
(209 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effective tax rate
|
|
|
20% |
|
|
|
0 |
% |
|
|
23.1 |
% |
All deferred tax assets or liabilities were eliminated when the
assets, liabilities and businesses to which they relate were
disposed as part of the Financial Restructuring of May 19,
2003.
The Financial Restructuring was implemented by way of two
separate schemes of arrangement under section 425 of the
U.K. Companies Act 1985. As a result, the gain on disposal
described in note 3 will not give rise to any taxable
amounts.
The tax on discontinued operations and on the disposal of
discontinued operations is £nil.
|
|
22. |
Related party transactions |
The Company and its subsidiaries have had no related party
transaction during the fiscal year 2005. The Company and its
subsidiaries had sales and purchases during the year with equity
investments, joint ventures and associates, which are not
consolidated, during fiscal 2004 and 2003. All transactions are
in the ordinary course of business. The primary transactions
between the Company and related parties are summarized as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended | |
|
|
March 31, 2004 | |
|
|
MMFG(1) | |
|
Other | |
|
|
£000 | |
|
£000 | |
|
|
| |
Statement of operations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended | |
|
|
March 31, 2003 | |
|
|
MMFG(1) | |
|
Other | |
|
|
£000 | |
|
£000 | |
|
|
| |
Statement of operations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30,000 |
|
Balance sheet:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trade receivables
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26,000 |
|
Trade payables
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
MMFG Marconi Medical Financial Group (formerly known
as Picker Financial) |
F-40
All the contracts and other arrangements are with Atlantic
Telecommunications Limited/ GaMMa, Alstom and the joint ventures
described below which management believe have been on
arms-length terms and which were part of the Group prior
to the Financial Restructuring on May 19, 2003.
Atlantic Telecommunications Limited/ GaMMa
The Company owned 19.7% of Atlantic Telecommunications Limited
(Atlantic). Atlantic went into administration on October 5,
2001. GaMMa acquired certain assets from Atlantic in bankruptcy.
The Company received a 14.3% beneficial holding in GaMMa in
December 2001, in consideration of the waiver of retention of
title claims against certain assets of Atlantic, the grant of
software licenses and procurement of the assignment of the
indefeasible right of use terms granted by Easynet. Under the
terms of the agreement with GaMMa, the Company received warrants
equating to 1.7% of the authorized share capital of GaMMa.
CosmoCom
As of June 18, 2003, Capital Limited owned 5.7% of
CosmoCom, Inc. CosmoCom, Inc. develops and deploys call center
products and services. Marconi Communications International
Limited, or MCIL, entered into a Value Added Reseller Agreement
with CosmoCom, Inc. on March 3, 2000, as amended by
Amendment No. 1, dated September 8, 2000, the VAR,
whereby would act as a reseller of certain CosmoCom, Inc.
products. Subject to other terms of the VAR, including the
termination provisions contained therein, MCIL was required to
purchase products and/or services of $12,000,000 over
approximately a three year period. On or about October 29,
2001, MCIL advised CosmoCom, Inc. that it was terminating the
VAR, and is making no further purchases at this time. During the
term of the VAR, purchased approximately $1.5 million of
products and/or services. MCIL and CosmoCom are currently
involved in litigation wherein each party asserts that the other
party has breached the VAR.
|
|
|
Marconi (Malaysia) SDN BHD |
Marconi Communications S.p.A. owns a 30% shareholding in Marconi
(Malaysia) SDN BHD, a business that sells and installs
telecommunications equipment. During the fiscal year ended
March 31, 2003, the Company supplied network equipment
products totaling £23.1 million to Marconi (Malaysia)
SDN BHD, at arms-length terms.
The Company formed a joint venture company with Railtrack
Telecom Services Limited, or RTSL, on April 26, 2001 to
support the deployment of next generation broadband wireless
networks. The Company and RTSL each had a 50 percent
interest in the joint venture company until February 2003 when
the Company settled litigation with RTSL and RTSL assumed full
control of Ultramast. Albany Partnership Ltd., or APT, a wholly
owned subsidiary of the Company, has a consultancy agreement
with Ultramast to provide it with telecommunications consultancy
services to design, construct and maintain masts for the next
generation networks. Ultramast also has an agreement with
ipsaris Limited under which ipsaris is nominated as the
preferred supplier for connectivity for the telecommunications
network.
Confirmant is a 50-50 joint venture between Marconi Corporation
plc and Oxford Glyco Sciences (U.K.) Limited, a wholly
owned subsidiary of Oxford Glyco Sciences plc. Confirmant was
formed in June 2001 for the purpose of completing and then
offering for subscription a proteomic database and for providing
managed hosting services to the biotech sector. Although the
Companys outstanding contracts with Confirmant have not
been formally cancelled, all members of the Confirmant board of
directors have acknowledged that they are de facto cancelled
and, therefore, the Company has no remaining liability under
those contracts.
F-41
Easynet Group plc
In February 2002, the Company was obliged to acquire by a put
option 1,324,054 ordinary shares in Easynet for
£20 million. The Company disputed the legal basis of
the put option and entered into litigation with Railtrack Group.
In February 2003, the litigation with Railtrack Group was
settled and the Company became beneficial owners of the
1,324,054 Easynet ordinary shares under the put option.
Consequently, the £20 million and related impairment
have been reflected in equity in loss of affiliates. The put
option increased the equity holding to 72.7% and the holding of
voting shares to 51.6%. However, under the Articles of
Association of Easynet and a relationship agreement with
Easynet, the voting rights in Easynet are limited to 49.9%.
Accordingly, Easynet applied in April 2003 to the U.K. Listing
Authority to cancel the 1,324,054 ordinary shares and non-voting
convertible shares have been issued to the Company in exchange.
Since the Company were not able to exercise control over Easynet
at anytime, the Company have continued to account for Easynet
using the equity method of accounting.
No significant transactions with directors or other executive
officers of the Company have occurred during fiscal 2004, 2003
or 2002. Sir Alan Rudge, a non-executive director of the Company
and non-executive chairman of MSI (acquired in 2001), held a
substantial number of share options in MSI. At completion, he
received approximately $5.3 million from MSI in respect of
the cancellation of his options. Sir Alan Rudge did not
participate in that part of any board meeting, which considered
the acquisition of MSI, nor did he receive any board papers
related thereto.
|
|
23. |
Subsidiary company and equity investee information |
The following table provides information on the principal
subsidiary undertakings and other associated companies that the
Company considers to have had a significant impact on the
assessment of the assets and liabilities, the financial position
and/or the profits and losses of the Company to March 31,
2004. Except where stated otherwise, each of these companies was
wholly owned by a member of the Company and the share capital
was fully paid up to May 19, 2003.
|
|
|
|
Name |
|
Registered Office |
|
|
|
Network Equipment and Services
|
|
|
|
Marconi Communications Limited
|
|
New Century Park, PO Box 53, Coventry CV3 1HJ, England |
|
Marconi Communications S.p.A.
|
|
Via Ludovico Calda 5, 16153 Genoa, Italy |
|
Marconi Communications, Inc.
|
|
c/o The Corporation Trust Company, Corporation Trust Center,
1209 Orange Street, Wilmington, Delaware, 19801, U.S.A |
|
Marconi Communications GmbH
|
|
Gerberstrasse 33, D 71522 Backnang, Germany |
Capital
|
|
|
|
Marconi Mobile
S.p.A.(1)
|
|
Via A. Negrone 1/A, 16153 Genoa, Italy |
Other Associated Companies
|
|
|
|
Easynet Group plc (72.7% group equity share; 49.9% voting
share)(2)
|
|
44-46 Whitfield Street, London W1T 2RJ, England |
|
|
|
|
(1) |
Marconi Mobile S.p.A. was sold as part of the disposal of
Marconi Mobile Holdings S.p.A. to Finmeccanica S.p.A. on
August 2, 2002. |
|
|
(2) |
See note 14, Investments in affiliates. |
F-42
The undertakings in which the Companys interest at
March 31, 2005 of more than 20% are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Class and | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
percentage | |
|
|
Country of |
|
Principal |
|
of ordinary | |
Undertakings |
|
incorporation |
|
activity |
|
shares held | |
|
|
| |
Ancrane
|
|
England and Wales |
|
Non trading |
|
|
100% |
|
M Ansty Limited
|
|
England and Wales |
|
Dormant |
|
|
100% |
|
M Nominees Limited
|
|
England and Wales |
|
Dormant |
|
|
100% |
|
Photoniqa Limited
|
|
England and Wales |
|
Dormant |
|
|
100% |
|
Yeslink Unlimited*
|
|
England and Wales |
|
Dormant |
|
|
100% |
|
|
|
|
|
* |
Yeslink Unlimited is a subsidiary of Photoniqa Limited. |
All other subsidiary undertakings were disposed of as part of
the Financial Restructuring on May 19, 2003 described in
note 3.
F-43